alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knoll, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Andrew B.Cogan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

 

a.               The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.              The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

May 10,2010

 

 
| /s/ Andrew B.  Cogan     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| **Andrew  B. Cogan**     |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

----
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 39 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2009 

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 5, 2009, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly desVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:22 Mar 11, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC39.RFS HC39

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HCON 39 RFS 

1 ignate, the 2009 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

2 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

3 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

4 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

5 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum6 mer games. 

7 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

8 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

9 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

10 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA11 TIONS. 

12 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

13 for physical preparations for the event. 

14 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

15 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce16 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

17 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise18 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

19 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

20 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 400

To designate October 20, 1994, as ‘‘Leyte Landing Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 10, 1994

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate October 20, 1994, as ‘‘Leyte Landing Day’’.

Whereas the landing at Leyte Gulf, Philippines, was a crucial

turning point in the Allied Force’s victory in the Pacific

Theater of Battle during World War II;

Whereas the landing of these forces was made possible by the

heroism and skill of brave Filipino forces;

Whereas the landing at Leyte led to the eventual liberation

of the Philippines, thus ending 3 years of occupation by

enemy forces;

Whereas the liberation of the Philippines was a key and crucial step in the ultimate triumph in the Pacific;
2

•HJ 400 IH

Whereas the aerial and naval battles were led by General

Douglas MacArthur and Admiral Chester Nimitz;

Whereas veterans of the United States Armed Forces and of

the Filipino Armed Forces have reason to recall this

event with pride;

Whereas the American public should be given every opportunity to learn more about the important contributions

and remarkable sacrifices made by Filipinos on behalf of

the Allied War effort and that such actions should be remembered with all appropriate dignity and respect; and

Whereas October 20, 1994, marks the 50th anniversary of

the historic landing: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That October 20, 1994, is designated as ‘‘Leyte Landing

4 Day’’ and the President is authorized and requested to

5 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

6 States to observe such day with appropriate programs,

7 ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 100 
          - [CGD 05-00-053] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of implementation. 

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations at 33 CFR 100.511 for the Eastport Yacht Club Lighted Boat Parade, a marine event to be held December 9, 2000, on the waters of Spa Creek and the Severn River at Annapolis, Maryland. These special local regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic due to the confined nature of the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the event. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for the safety of spectators and vessels transiting the event area. 

# DATES:

33 CFR 100.511 is effective from 4:45 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. on December 9, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief Warrant Officer R. L. Houck, Marine Events Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2674. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Eastport Yacht Club will sponsor a lighted boat parade on the waters of the Severn River and Spa Creek at Annapolis, Maryland. The event will consist of approximately 50 vessels, ranging in length from 20 to 55 feet, traveling at slow speed along two separate parade routes in Annapolis Harbor. In order to ensure the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.511 will be in effect for the duration of the event. Under provisions of 33 CFR 100.511, vessels may not enter the regulated area without permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Spectator vessels may anchor outside the regulated area but may not block a navigable channel. Because these restrictions will only be in effect for a limited period, they should not result in a significant disruption of maritime traffic. 

      ( print page 76154)    
Dated: November 21, 2000. 

T.C. Paar, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 00-31045 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
##### 



EXHIBIT 11 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(in thousands, except per share data) (a) Computation of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the fiscal
years ended the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. Shares of
    
    
    Weighted SharesCommon Stock
    
    
    Outstanding2002January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002
    
    
    10,520
    
    
    
    10,520Shares issued on exercise of stock options
    
    
    255
    
    
    
    195Shares issued under Directors Stock Plan
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    1Shares issued to BellSouth Wireless for the conversion of 30,000 preferred
stock shares into 625,000 common shares, converted on December 2, 2002
    
    
    625
    
    
    
    50Total
    
    
    11,403
    
    
    
    10,7662003January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003
    
    
    11,403
    
    
    
    11,403Shares issued on exercise of stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Shares issued under Directors Stock Plan
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    7Shares purchased as treasury stock from BellSouth Wireless on March 28, 2003
    
    
    (625
    )
    
    
    (476
    )Total
    
    
    10,790
    
    
    
    10,9342004January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004
    
    
    10,790
    
    
    
    10,790Shares issued on exercise of stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Shares issued under Directors Stock Plan
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    5Shares issued under Employee Stock Plan
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    2Shares issued to Laurus Master Fund, Inc. on December 23, 2004
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    1Total
    
    
    10,812
    
    
    
    10,798
 (b) Computation of Earnings per Share Computation of earnings per share is net earnings (loss) divided by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. 2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004Net loss
    
    $
    (7,690
    )
    
    $
    (1,404
    )
    
    $
    (2,079
    )Weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding
    
    
    10,766
    
    
    
    10,934
    
    
    
    10,798Basic loss per share
    
    $
    (0.71
    )
    
    $
    (0.13
    )
    
    $
    (0.19
    )Diluted loss per share
    
    $
    (0.71
    )
    
    $
    (0.13
    )
    
    $
    (0.19
    )
 60
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,675
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,875
<PP&E>                                          85,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 754,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,687
<BONDS>                                        284,749
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                     395,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,854
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,582
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,650
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1797 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure health insurance 

coverage continuity for former foster youth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure 

health insurance coverage continuity for former foster youth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance for 

5 Former Foster Youth Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COVERAGE CONTINUITY FOR FORMER FOSTER 

7 CARE CHILDREN UP TO AGE 26. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(IX) of 

9 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(IX)) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1797 IS

1 (1) in item (bb)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘are not described in or en3 rolled under’’ and inserting ‘‘are not described 

4 in and are not enrolled under’’; and 

5 (B) by striking the semicolon at the end 

6 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

7 (2) in item (cc), by striking ‘‘responsibility of 

8 the State’’ and all that follows through 

9 ‘‘475(8)(B)(iii); and’’ and inserting ‘‘responsibility 

10 of a State on the date of attaining 18 years of age 

11 (or such higher age as such State has elected under 

12 section 475(8)(B)(iii)), or who were in such care on 

13 the date of attaining 14 years of age but subse14 quently left such care to enter into a legal guardian15 ship with a kinship caregiver (without regard to 

16 whether kinship guardianship payments are being 

17 made on behalf of the child under this part)’’; and 

18 (3) by striking item (dd). 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of 

21 this Act. 

22 SEC. 3. OUTREACH EFFORTS FOR ENROLLMENT OF 

23 FORMER FOSTER CHILDREN. 

24 Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

25 1396a(a)) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1797 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (82), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

2 inserting a semicolon; 

3 (2) in paragraph (83), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (83) the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(84) not later than January 1, 2019, establish 

8 an outreach and enrollment program, in coordination 

9 with the State agency responsible for administering 

10 the State plan under part E of title IV and any 

11 other appropriate or interested agencies, designed to 

12 increase the enrollment of individuals who are eligi13 ble for medical assistance under the State plan 

14 under paragraph (10)(A)(i)(IX) in accordance with 

15 best practices established by the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1565 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1565

To prohibit the importation of foreign-made flags of the United States 
                              of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the importation of foreign-made flags of the United States 
                              of America.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Flag Fidelity Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPORTATION OF FOREIGN-MADE AMERICAN FLAGS PROHIBITED.

    After the date of the enactment of this Act, no flag of the United 
States of America (regardless of size and whether or not in compliance 
with the standard proportions prescribed by Executive order) that is 
the product or manufacture of any foreign country or instrumentality 
may be imported into the United States.

                                 <all>
```
# Официален вестник C 54A/21 ф

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 54A |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 6021 февруари 2017 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 54A

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 6021 февруари 2017 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Съвет |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Удължаване на срока на валидност на резервни списъци | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Съвет

2017/C 54 A/01

Удължаване на срока на валидност на резервни списъци

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Съвет

| 21.2.2017 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 54/1

---

Удължаване на срока на валидност на резервни списъци

(2017/C 054 A/01)

С решение на генералния секретар на Съвета на Европейския съюз срокът на валидност на следните резервни списъци с подходящи кандидати, изготвени в резултат на изброените по-долу открити конкурси, се удължава: до 31 декември 2019 г.

| CONS/AD/430


  (два профила) | за съставяне на резервен списък от кандидати за старши администратори в областта на европейската политика за сигурност и отбрана (ЕПСО). Конкурсът касае два профила със степен AD 9 (профил 1: висши отговорници по стратегията на планиране на операции и мисии за управление на кризи; профил 2: старши специалисти по планиране на развитието на способностите: военни/граждански/космически), уведомлението за който бе публикувано в
  Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 178 А от 15 юли 2008 г. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | за съставяне на резервен списък от кандидати за началник отдел със степен AD 12 в областта на писмения превод с основен език ирландски, уведомлението за който бе публикувано в
  Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 99 А от 30 април 2009 г. |

CONS/AD/430

(два профила)

за съставяне на резервен списък от кандидати за старши администратори в областта на европейската политика за сигурност и отбрана (ЕПСО). Конкурсът касае два профила със степен AD 9 (профил 1: висши отговорници по стратегията на планиране на операции и мисии за управление на кризи; профил 2: старши специалисти по планиране на развитието на способностите: военни/граждански/космически), уведомлението за който бе публикувано в
  Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 178 А от 15 юли 2008 г.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

за съставяне на резервен списък от кандидати за началник отдел със степен AD 12 в областта на писмения превод с основен език ирландски, уведомлението за който бе публикувано в
  Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 99 А от 30 април 2009 г.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-92350) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors
and the 1990 Restated Stock Option Plan of InControl, Inc. of our report dated
January 29, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
InControl, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.



                              /s/  Ernst & Young LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 30, 1997
#### HENWOOD v. MASSINGILL.

No. 3623.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

March 4, 1940.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1940.

Ramey, Calhoun & Marsh, of Tyler, for appellant.

H. R. Rolston, of Lufkin, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

On the 8th day of July, 1939, in county court of Angelina county, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee, John Mas-singill, against appellant, Berryman Hen-wood, trustee St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas, debtor, for the sum of $530, damages assessed by a jury resulting from a railroad crossing accident. The evidence raised the fact issues of negligence submitted to the jury, and satisfactorily supports the-jury’s findings.

Proximate canse and its element “new and independent cause” were fact issues for the jury. The court submitted the following definition of proximate cause: “ ‘Proximate Cause,’ as used herein, means the moving and efficient cause, which, in a natural and continued sequence, produces the result complained of, and without which that result would not have occurred, and in the light of the attendant circumstances, such result, or a similar one, ought to have been foreseen by a person of ordinary care and prudence.”

Southland Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Cotten, 126 Tex. 596, 91 S.W.2d 326, by the Commission of Appeals, supports appellant’s proposition that the court erred in refusing to define the term “moving and efficient cause” as used in the court’s charge. Appellee would support the court’s definition with Foster v. Beckman, Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 789, which is in point. But as we construe the Cotten case, it overruled the Beckman case, and the authorities cited therein. The other points of error need not occur on another trial.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 92 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 92

Providing for the disapproval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
 for cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation 
               pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2010

 Ms. Ros-Lehtinen (for herself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. Royce) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the disapproval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
 for cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation 
               pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
favor the proposed agreement for cooperation transmitted to the 
Congress by the President on May 10, 2010.
                                 <all>
```