alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Source Interlink Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, S.
Leslie Flegel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements section 31(a) or 15(d) of
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            S. Leslie Flegel
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            June 16, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1838 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1838

  To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations Act for 
 States to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a 
    labor organization as a condition of employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 2017

 Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Brown, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
  Merkley, Mr. Markey, and Ms. Hassan) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations Act for 
 States to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a 
    labor organization as a condition of employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Workers and Improving 
Labor Standards Act''.

SEC. 2. PREEMPTING STATE RIGHT-TO-WORK LAWS.

    Subsection (b) of section 14 of the National Labor Relations Act 
(29 U.S.C. 164) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-553-002]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

December 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 22, 2000, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain pro forma revised tariff 
sheets to comply with the Commission's Order issued on October 27, 2000 
in Docket Nos. RM96-1-14 and RP00-553-000.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to comply 
with the Commission's October 27 Order in the referenced dockets to 
file tariff sheets within 30 days of the order describing how imbalance 
netting and trading will be performed on the Transco system when such 
trading becomes operational. Transco anticipates that it will propose 
to implement, among other things, imbalance netting and trading when it 
files to revise its tariff to reflect its new, state of the art, 
internet-based, service delivery computer system, 1Linesm. This new 
computer system will replace Transco's current computer system and 
therefore, the pro forma tariff sheets and explanation of Transco's 
proposed imbalance netting and trading service contained herein 
necessarily include related tariff changes that Transco will propose as 
part of its complete service delivery tariff filing.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31134 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6632-6633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Combinatorial Tools and Advanced Data Analysis 
Methods for Heterogeneous Catalysis

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 20, 1999, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), UOP LLC and Nonlinear Dynamics 
Incorporated (NDI) have filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and

[[Page 6633]]

objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Nonlinear 
Dynamics Incorporated (NDI), Ann Arbor, MI; and UOP LLC, Des Plaines, 
IL. The nature and objectives of the venture are to conduct research 
for ``Combinatorial Tools and Advanced Data Analysis Methods for 
Heterogeneous Catalysis''.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-3126 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 10.1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT

TO

THE SCOTTS COMPANY 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN


2005 AMENDMENT




     WHEREAS, the shareholders of The Scotts Company (“Scotts”) previously approved the adoption of
The Scotts Company 1996 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, on March 18, 2005 (the “Effective Time”), Scotts consummated the restructuring of
Scotts’ corporate structure into a holding company structure by merging Scotts into a wholly-owned
second-tier Ohio limited liability company subsidiary, The Scotts Company LLC (“Scotts LLC”),
pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 13, 2004 (the “Merger
Agreement”), by and among Scotts, Scotts LLC and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (the “Company”);
and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company assumed, as of the Effective Time, the
Plan and all obligations and liabilities of Scotts thereunder; and



     WHEREAS, Section 9 of the Plan provides that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”)
may amend the Plan at any time without shareholder approval except to the extent that shareholder
approval is required to satisfy applicable requirements imposed by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; applicable requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended; or any securities exchange, market or other quotation system on or through which the
Company’s securities are listed or traded; and



     WHEREAS, the Board has resolved to amend the Plan to reflect the Company’s assumption of the
Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective as of the Effective Time as follows:



     1. The title of the Plan is amended to be “The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company 1996 Stock Option
Plan.”



     2. Section 2.1(k) of the Plan is amended and restated, in its entirety, to read as follows:
“Company” means The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, an Ohio corporation, and any successor thereto.



     3. Section 2.1(s) of the Plan is amended and restated to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“Plan” means The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company 1996 Stock Option Plan, as in effect from time to time.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the 6th day of
May, 2005, to be effective as of March 18, 2005.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY

 	 
	 	By: /s/ Christopher L. Nagel

 	 
	 	Print Name: Christopher L. Nagel
 	 
	 	Title:  	EVP and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Supplementary Information:

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: November 29, 2000. 

Jennifer J. Johnson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-30759 Filed 11-30-00; 11:19 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### In the Matter of Paul Ferrara, Appellant, v Edward V. Regan, as New York State Comptroller and as Administrator of the New York State Policemen’s & Firemen’s Retirement System, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cheeseman, J.), entered September 25, 1989 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for a redetermination of his retirement status.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice Paul E. Cheeseman. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                               FINE HOST CORPORATION
                           COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
                                   (IN THOUSANDS)

                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED             NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                         ----------------------------  ----------------------------
                                         SEPTEMBER 25,  SEPTEMBER 27,  SEPTEMBER 25,  SEPTEMBER 27,
                                             1996           1995           1996           1995
                                         -------------  -------------  -------------  -------------
                                                 (as restated)                 (as restated)
<S>                                        <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>
Loss applicable to Common Stock             $ (354)        $ (377)       $(2,589)       $(2,272)
Stock warrant accretion                          -           (212)        (1,300)          (286)
                                            ------         ------        -------        -------
Net loss attributable to Common 
     Stockholders                           $ (354)        $ (589)       $(3,889)       $(2,558)
                                            ======         ======        =======        =======

Weighted average number of common shares 
     outstanding                             6,165          2,048          3,523          2,048
Average convertible Preferred shares 
     outstanding                                 -              -              -              -
Assumed conversion of:
     Warrants                                    -              -              -              -
     Options                                     -              -             -              - 
                                            ------         ------        -------        -------

Average number of shares of Common Stock
     outstanding                             6,165          2,048          3,523          2,048
                                            ======         ======        =======        =======

Net loss per share                          $ (.06)        $ (.29)       $ (1.10)       $ (1.25)
                                            ======         ======        =======        =======

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.35D



 Exhibit 10.35D 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT, dated as of
September 18, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), by and between SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and JEFFREY A. STOOPS (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as of January 1, 2008 (the “Employment
Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, and
the Executive has determined that it is in his best interests, to amend the Employment Agreement to (i) extend the Initial Term for an additional three years and (ii) reflect the Executive’s current Base Salary. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 
 1. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in place thereof: 
 “2. TERM. The term of employment of the Executive by the Company Group hereunder commenced as of January 1, 2003 (the “Effective Date”) and shall end December 31, 2011 (the “Initial Term”),
unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided or automatically extended in accordance with Section 7(a). All references herein to the “Term” shall refer to both the Initial Term and any automatic extension of the term that occurs
in accordance with Section 7(a) during the Initial Term.” 
 2. Effective as of January 1, 2008, the first sentence of
Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in place thereof: 
 “During
the Term, the Executive shall be paid an annual salary at a rate of $490,000.00 per annum, which amount may be increased but not decreased by the Company Board (the “Base Salary”).” 
 3. Except as set forth herein, this Amendment shall be effective as of the Effective Date. 
 4. All capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Employment
Agreement, as amended hereby. 
 5. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms. 







 6. This Amendment may be executed by either of the parties hereto in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute the same instrument. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has
caused this Amendment to be signed by its officer pursuant to the authority of its Board of Directors, and the Executive has executed this Amendment, as of the day and year first written above. 
  

			
	 SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Thomas P. Hunt

		 	Thomas P. Hunt, Senior Vice President and General Counsel
		
	 and
	 	
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Steven Bernstein

		 	Steven Bernstein, Chairman of the Board
		 	of SBA Communications Corporation
	
	 EXECUTIVE

	
	 /s/ Jeffrey A. Stoops

	 JEFFREY A. STOOPS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1857 

To establish a compliance deadline of May 15, 2023, for Step 2 emissions 

standards for new residential wood heaters, new residential hydronic 

heaters, and forced-air furnaces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. MANCHIN, and Mr. SHELBY) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To establish a compliance deadline of May 15, 2023, for 

Step 2 emissions standards for new residential wood 

heaters, new residential hydronic heaters, and forcedair furnaces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STEP 2 COMPLIANCE DEADLINE FOR NEW RESI4 DENTIAL WOOD HEATERS, NEW RESIDENTIAL 

5 HYDRONIC HEATERS, AND FORCED-AIR FUR6 NACES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—With respect to the final rule enti8 tled ‘‘Standards of Performance for New Residential 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1857 IS

1 Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and 

2 Forced-Air Furnaces’’ (80 Fed. Reg. 13672 (March 16, 

3 2015)), the compliance deadline for Step 2 emissions 

4 standards shall be May 15, 2023. 

5 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING CHANGES.—Not 

6 later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 

7 the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agen8 cy shall finalize such technical and conforming changes to 

9 rules and guidance documents as may be necessary to im10 plement subsection (a). 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
#### 6814 King Brokerage Taxi Medallion Sales, Ltd., Appellant, v Jack Lusk, as Chairman of the Taxi and Limousine Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

—Order Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered on February 13, 1990, which dismissed petitioner’s CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination by respondent refusing to renew petitioner’s taxi broker license, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent refused to renew petitioner’s license as a taxi broker because petitioner’s principal was admittedly convicted on felony charges arising out of a scheme to divert money that was to have been used to finance the purchase and sale of taxi "medallion” licenses. The notice of hearing was sufficient to apprise the petitioner of pendency of the charges and to afford it the opportunity to present objections, and the proceedings otherwise complied with the requirements of due process *(Silverstein v Minkin,*49 NY2d 260, *rearg denied*50 NY2d 929; *Matter of Erdman v Ingraham,*28 AD2d 5, *mot to dismiss appeal withdrawn*20 NY2d 768). Although the hearing was *289informal, petitioner voiced no objection, and may not now be heard to complain. Finally, the determination is adequately supported by adequate proof *(Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33943]


Progressive Rail, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--
Canadian Pacific Railway

    Progressive Rail, Inc., a Class III rail carrier has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire from 
Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) and operate CPR's Richfield Line located 
in Bloomington, Richfield and Minneapolis, MN. The track extends from 
Auto Club, MN, milepost 25.63, to end of track at Pleasant Avenue South 
and West 60th Street, Minneapolis, a distance of approximately 9.1 
miles.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on December 1, 2000.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33943, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Mr. Dave Fellon, President, Progressive Rail, Inc., 21778 
Highview Avenue, Lakeville, MN 55044.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``www.stb.dot.gov.''

    Decided: November 22, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30520 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### HOLT v. STATE.

No. 19911.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Nov. 9, 1938.

C. E. Farmer and Clarke Wills, both of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for violating the medical practice act, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 741, subd. 2; art. 742, punishment being a fine of $100 and six months’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception, save exception reserved to failure to give certain requested charges. In the absence of a statement of facts it can not be known whether the refusal of said instructions was erroneous.

There appears in the record the following verdict of the jury: “We the jury find the defendant guilty as charged in the information and assess his punishment at $100.00 fine and six months in jail.” In the judgment as it appears in the transcript the verdict was not set out correctly. The judgment will be reformed to show corrected verdict, and judgment in accordance therewith.

As reformed the judgment is affirmed.