alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### T o n g, St a nl ey

Fr o m: B ill W e l c h <b w e l c h @a q m d.g ov> S e nt: F rid ay , M ay 20

, 2016 7 : 42 AM
T o: T o ng, St a nl ey S u b j ec t: R E: D e v e l op me nt o f P M C h a r b r o iling E m i ss i o n F ac t o r s u s ing S C 5 .1

S t a n ,

Y o u a r e c o rr e c t

. T h e e m iss i o n fac t o r s we r e d e v e l o p e d u si ng S C A Q M D M et h o d 5

. 1

. T h e t o t a l P M w as d e te r m i n e d fr o m
t h e a qu e o u s a nd o r g a n ic f r ac t i o n s o f t h e i m p i ng e r s o l u t i o n s a dd e d t o t h e fi l te r c o ll e c t i o n

.

Bill

F r o m: T o n g , S ta n l e y [ ma il t o : T o n g

. S ta n l e y @ e p a .g ov ] S e n t: F rid a y , M a y 20
, 2 0 1 6 6: 0 3 A M T o: Bill W e l c h S u b j e c t: D e v e l o p me n t o f P M C h a rbroili n g Em issi o n F a c t ors u s i n g S C 5

. 1



### B ill

,

I ’ d li k e t o c o n f i r m o u r e a rli e r d i sc u ss i on t ha t t h e C ha r b r o il e r

P M e m i s s i on f a c t o r s o u r c e t e s t i n g s t ud y t ha t y ou a n d N o r be c k c o m p l e t e d u s i n g S ou t h C oa s t M e t h o d 5

. 1 c ap t u r ed an d r epo r t ed bo t h f il t e r ab l e and c on d en s ab l e P M

.

W .A. W e l c h

, J

. M

. N o r b e ck

, " D e v e l o p m e n t o f E m i ss i o n T e s t M e t h od s an d E m i ss i on F a c t o r s f o r Va ri ou s C o m m e r c i a l C oo k i n g O pe r a t i on s , " Ot he r D o c u m e n t s a nd P r e s en t a t i on s , S y m p o s i u m P ape r fo r A m e ri c an So c i e t y o f H ea t i n g , R e f ri g e r a t i ng , and A ir-C o n d i t i on i n g E n g i nee r s A n n ua l M e e t i n g

. T o r o n t o , J u ne

. T O

- 98

- 14

- 3

, 19 9 8

.

Sta n

___ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ ___ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ ___ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ ___ _ __ _ __ __ S ta n l e y T ong U S E P A R e g i on I X Ai r D i v i s i o n

- R u l e s O ff i c e ( A IR 4 ) 75 H a wtho r ne S t. S an Fr a n c i sc o, C A 9 41 0 5

tong. s t an l e y @e pa

. g ov 415 947 41 2 2 ( w ) 415 947 35 7 9 ( f )
Alia s Air , Inc . 174 7 Pennsylvani a Avenue , N W Suit s 87 5 Washington , D.C . 2000 6

RUSSEL L E . POMME R {202 1 822-912 1 - T«l«phon e 1202 1 622-9152-Fa x ' rporr>ni«r<S>atlB9air . co m ^TiL^ENTO F

• I ;;rERA'nc: : 

### 1 L J

Ma y 27 , 201 1 Ms . Laur aRem o Chief , Ai r Carrie r Fitnes s Divisio n U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Re : Atla s Air . Inc . Passenger Operation s Dea r Ms . Remo : O n Marc h 9 , 2011 , i n Supplement No . 1 t o it s applicatio n for acertificate o f publi c convenienc e an dnecessity authorizin g i t t o engag e i n interstat e charte r ai r transportatio n o f

persons , property an dmail . Docke t OST-2009-0268 , Atla s Air , Inc . ("Atlas" ) informe dth e Departmen t abou t it s recen t leas e o f athir dBoein g 74 7 passenge r . aircraf t t o b e use dprimaril y fo

r U.S . military flyin g and , t o alesse r extent , fo r commercial charte r

operations. ^ T o suppor

t it s then-pendin g reques t

for interstat e authority , Atla s provide d.standalon e cos t estimate s fo

r th e ne w aircraf

t a s wel l a s update d fitness information . Th e Departmen t grante. dth e applicatio n i n Orde r 2011-5-18 . Thi s i s t o advis e tha

t Atla s intende dSupplemen t No . 1 to constitut e it s 45-day notic e o f inten t t o operat e mor e than tw o passenge r aircraft , independentl y require db y Orderin g Paragrap h 2 o f

Orde r 2010-5-27 . A s th e Departmen t recentl y foun di n Order 2011-5-1 8 o n th e basi s o f

th e informatio n provide di n Supplemen t No . 1 , Atla s i s fit, willin g an dabl e t o operat e th e thre e passenge r aircraf t (i n additio n t o th e all-carg o aircraf t i n it s fleet) . Sinc e filing Supplement No . 1 , Atla s ha s no t

undergon e any material change s i n area s affectin g it s fitness or U.S . citizenship . Atla s continue s t o b e fit, willin g an dabl e to engag e i n interstat e an dforeig n ai r transportation , an di t

continue s t o b e a Unite dState s citizen. ^

^ I n Order

2011-5-1 8 a

t 2 , th e Departmen t

erroneousl y suggeste dthat Atla s intend s t o us e it s tw o initial B74 7 passenge r

aircraf t fo r it s domesti c militar

y passenge r

flying . Thos e aircraf

t hav e bee n an dwil l remai n dedicate dt o th e Housto n Expres s charter service , wit

h occasiona l us e fo

r commercial charter s uude r Par t 212 . ^ Notably , unlik e ne w entrant s typicall y subjec t t o numerica l aircraf

t fleet siz e restrictions . Atla s i s awell

establishe dairline , wit

h 2 8 Boein g 74 7 wide-body aircraf t currentl y oh it s FAA-issue doperation s specifications . AsofMarch3I,20n , it s parent , Atla s Ai r Worldwid e Holdings , Inc. , hel dcasli , cas h equivalent s an dshort-terminvestment s o f $584. 4 million . Fro maDO T fitness standpoint , Atlas ' passenge r andcarg o operation s shoul db e considere dindistinc tMs . Laur aRem o

May 27 , 201 1 Pag e 2 Than k

yo u ver y muc h fo

r you r attentio n t o thi s matter . Very trul y yours^'^' ' ~ ) Russel l E , Pomme r Associat e General Counse l an d Senio r Director , Regulatory Affair s
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative
Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

November 18, 2002



        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative
Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

November 18, 2002
#### BURNS v. STATE.

No. 16079.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 7, 1933.

Lockhart *&*Brown, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.'

Conviction is for operating an overloaded truck upon the public roads in violation of the law, punishment assessed being a fine of $100.

We observe no vice in the information and complaint charging the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is afBrmed.
Exhibit 10.3


 


Tri-S Security Corporation


Summary of Board Compensation


 


On March 5,
2005, the Board of Directors of (the “Board”) of Tri-S Security Corporation
(the “Company”) approved the following compensation arrangements:


 


•                  The Company
shall pay each director $10,000 per year for service on the Board plus $2,500
per year for each committee of the Board upon which such director serves.


 


•                  The Company
shall reimburse each director for all travel expenses incurred in connection
with travel to and from Board and committee meetings.
#### MORRIS v. STATE.

No. 20359.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 19, 1939.

Conrad E. Smith, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is carrying a pistol; the punishment assessed is a fine of $500.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The information is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment' is affirmed.'

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,119,672
<SECURITIES>                                 9,182,078
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,082,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                    61,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,267,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,951,946
<PP&E>                                       3,943,660
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,624,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,705,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,979,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,904
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,219,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,705,105
<SALES>                                      2,512,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,525,910
<CGS>                                          714,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  714,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,960,239)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,960,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,960,239)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 167 

AN ACT 

To designate a National Memorial to Fallen Educators at 

the National Teachers Hall of Fame in Emporia, Kansas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 167 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Memorial to 

3 Fallen Educators Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The memorial to fallen educators 

6 located at the National Teachers Hall of Fame in Empo7 ria, Kansas, is designated as the ‘‘National Memorial to 

8 Fallen Educators’’. 

9 (b) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The national memo10 rial designated by this section is not a unit of the National 

11 Park System and the designation of the National Memo12 rial to Fallen Educators shall not require or permit Fed13 eral funds to be expended for any purpose related to that 

14 national memorial. 

Passed the Senate December 21, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 167 

AN ACT 

To designate a National Memorial to Fallen EduEmporia, Kansas. cators at the National Teachers Hall of Fame in
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Naposki, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered September 26, 1989, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### McDANIELS v. STATE.

No. 22707.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 12, 1944.

Aubrey Davee, of Brady, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for a violation of the liquor laws of McCulloch County, and fined the sum of $250, hence this appeal.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record, and the undisputed facts evidence a sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area.

As provided by law, the county attorney read the information before the jury in the opening of the trial. See Art. 642(1), C.C.P.

The judgment is affirmed.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

★ ●

●

● ●
**Part I, Section B, Item C -**  **ID Method T**  **- C507**  **5 P**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

ClinTrials Research Inc.
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
FYE 12/31/97


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             Col. A                     Col. B                   Col. C              Col. D           Col. E
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Additions
                                                       ------------------------
                                                                      Charged to
                                       Balance at                       Other
                                     Beginning of       Charged to     Accounts -  Deductions -       Balance at
          Description                   Period        Cost & Expense   Describe     Describe        End of Period
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                       <C>             <C>             <C>       <C>                <C>
Year Ended December 31, 1997:
 Deducted from asset accounts
 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts          744,217         350,848         0         211,735(A)         883,330
                                          -------         -------         -         -------            -------


Total                                     744,217         350,848         0         211,735            883,330
                                          =======         =======         =         =======            =======

Year Ended December 31, 1996:
Deducted from asset accounts
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts           315,445         533,994         0         105,222(A)         744,217
                                          -------         -------         -         -------            -------

Total                                     315,445         533,994         0         105,222            744,217
                                          =======         =======         =         =======            =======

Year Ended December 31, 1995:
Deducted from asset accounts
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts           312,623          65,110         0          62,288(A)         315,445
                                          -------         -------         -         -------            -------

Total                                     312,623          65,110         0          62,288            315,445
                                          =======         =======         =         =======            =======
</TABLE>

(A) - Uncollectible accounts written off



Note: Prior period amounts have been restated to give retroactive effect to the
      1997 merger with Ovation, which was accounted for as a pooling of
      interests.
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1732 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2018 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to promote 

testing of incentive payments for behavioral health providers for adoption and use of certified electronic health 

record technology. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1732 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

3 Behavioral Health Information Technology Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TESTING OF INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR BEHAV5 IORAL HEALTH PROVIDERS FOR ADOPTION 

6 AND USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC 

7 HEALTH RECORD TECHNOLOGY. 

8 Section 1115A(b)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1315a(b)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(xxv) Providing incentive payments 

12 to behavioral health providers for the adop13 tion and use of certified electronic health 

14 record technology (as defined in section 

15 1848(o)(4)) to improve the quality and co16 ordination of care through the electronic 

17 documentation and exchange of health in18 formation. Behavioral health providers may 

19 include— 

20 ‘‘(I) psychiatric hospitals (as de21 fined in section 1861(f)); 

22 ‘‘(II) community mental health 

23 centers (as defined in section 

24 1861(ff)(3)(B)); 

25 ‘‘(III) clinical psychologists (as 

26 defined in section 1861(ii)); 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

S 1732 RFH

1 ‘‘(IV) clinical social workers (as 

2 defined in section 1861(hh)(1)); and 

3 ‘‘(V) hospitals, treatment facili4 ties, and mental health or substance 

5 use disorder providers that participate 

6 in a State plan under title XIX or a 

7 waiver of such plan.’’. 

Passed the Senate May 7, 2018. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1




                          National Energy Group, Inc.
                  Computation of Historical Ration of Earnings
                                to Fixed Charges
                       (in thousands, except for ratios)


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                        Year ended December 31,
                                                     ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        1998           1999       2000          2001         2002
                                                     ----------    ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------


<S>                                                  <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings
  Income (loss) before income taxes and
    extraordinary items                              $ (164,514)   $    2,024   $   18,609   $    6,722   $   14,483
  Interest expense                                       15,719         1,909        9,656       21,224       18,964
  Amortization of debt issuance cost                        936           863          121           --           --
  Interest portion of rental expense                        100           129          135          135          135
                                                     ----------    ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
    Earnings (loss)                                  $ (147,759)   $      495   $   28,521   $   28,081   $   33,582
                                                     ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
Fixed charges:
  Interest, including capitalized portion            $   19,090         1,909   $    9,656   $   21,224       18,964
  Amortization of debt issuance cost                        936           863          121           --           --
  Interest portion of rental expense                        100           129          135          135          135
                                                     ----------    ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
    Fixed charges                                    $   20,126    $    2,901   $    9,912   $   21,359   $   19,099
                                                     ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           --            NA(a)        NA(a)       1.3x         1.8x
                                                     ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges              $ (167,885)   $       --   $       --   $       --   $       --
                                                     ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</Table>




(a) This ratio excludes approximately $17.7 million and $10.5 million for 1999
and 2000, respectively, of interest on the senior notes since the Company
discontinued the accrual of interest due to the Chapter 11 proceeding.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Denise Riverside, True Name Joanne Taylor, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, (1) as limited by her brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), imposed July 10, 1989, upon her conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 4 to 12 years’ imprisonment, and (2) by permission, from an order of the same court, dated October 12, 1989, which denied her motion to set aside the sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it from 4 to 12 years’ imprisonment to 3 to 9 years’ imprisonment; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed, and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

During the plea allocution, the defendant was informed that if she failed to appear on the date scheduled for sentencing, she would not be permitted to withdraw her plea and the sentence originally promised would be enhanced to 4 to 12 years’ imprisonment. Upon the defendant’s nonappearance, the sentencing court imposed the enhanced sentence. This procedure was entirely proper, and the defendant was not entitled to have the enhanced sentence set aside *(see, People v Harvey,*146 AD2d 585; *People v Warren,*121 AD2d 418; *People v Gamble,*111 AD2d 869; *see also, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816).

Under the circumstances of this case, however, we find that the sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.