alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011449
<NAME> SUBURBAN LODGES OF AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,096
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      716
<ALLOWANCES>                                       203
<INVENTORY>                                      2,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,890
<PP&E>                                         285,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,592
<BONDS>                                         97,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                     216,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,452
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,749
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,662
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
Certification

I, Mitchell Gerstein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Synergy Brands, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2005

/s/ Mitchell Gerstein
---------------------
Mitchell Gerstein
Chief Financial Officer


                                    EX-32.1
POINT ALTITUDE

TIMELINE ZULU

ON DECK 00-02 0 FORMAT

OFF DECK 03-08 0.1 QUALITY

TOTAL 09-14 0.2 MODE

15-20 0.3 RATE

STOP 21-26 0.4 VIDEO

START 27-32 0.5 SHUTTER

TAKE OFF TOTAL 33-38 0.6 FOCAL PT

LAND 39-44 0.7 ZOOM

DEBRIEF 45-50 0.8 RANGE

51-56 0.9 COLOR

57-62 1 BRIGHT

Project Form Date: 15 FEB 2015

BEARING TO MISSION

AIRSPACE CONTROLER

TRANSIT ALTITUDE

MISSION ALTITUDE

RETURN ALTITUDE

TAKE OFF ALTITUDE

RANGE TO MISSION

N

N

N

E

E

E

BATTERY/FUEL

LONG

Weather Brief:

Maintenance Issues:

LAT

SHOW TIME

N

N

N

N

N

E

E

E

FLIGHT

E

PROJECT: 

BRIEF TIME

IN PLACE

E

NOTES

Approval Documents: NOTAMS - Permission - Risk Assessment - COA - Project Concept - Flight Log

PHOTO/VIDEO

MINUTES CAMERA
----

(2004/C 84 E/0916)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0618/04

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(1 March 2004)

Subject:   Decision by the Dutch parliament to expel thousands of immigrants

On 17 February 2004 the Dutch parliament adopted a government bill to expel some 26 000 immigrants and refugees who have been living in the country for years, including many young people born in the Netherlands. The bill also provides for new, more stringent conditions for granting asylum to immigrants, in line with the tough immigration policy pursued by the Dutch Government over the last few years. The majority of Dutch society, together with scores of non-governmental organisations, have declared their opposition to this inhumane and racist decision. The UN High Commission for Refugees has also expressed its opposition to the plan, since many immigrants in the Netherlands face serious problems, and there is no prospect of repatriating them safely to their countries of origin.

Will the Commission say whether it considers that the specific measures to expel immigrants from the Netherlands by force are compatible with the 1951 Geneva Convention and the Tampere commitments to draw up an integrated European asylum and immigration policy with transparent rules based on European humanitarian values and respect for the dignity of the human person?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(13 April 2004)

The Commission was not sent the Government Bill adopted by the Dutch Parliament on 17 February 2004.

As far as the Commission is aware, the national measures at stake concern only rejected asylum seekers. The Dutch Aliens law provides for a general possibility of review by Courts of negative decisions. Courts are competent to decide, on a case by case basis, whether the removals would be in accordance with obligations under international law, in particular under the 1951 Geneva Convention on the status of refugees and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Commission would like to underline that, in general, the possibility of return of rejected asylum seekers could be the logical consequence where the outcome of an asylum procedure is negative for the applicant, when the procedure was fair and allowed for all needs for international protection to be examined. A final negative decision implies that the person at stake was not found to be in need of international protection. If there are no other grounds for legal stay, return can be implemented.

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Santos Morales Rodriguez, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered March 10, 1987, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the County Court’s determination that the defendant was competent to stand trial *(see, People v Santos,*43 AD2d 73; *see also, People v Picozzi,*106 AD2d 413). We have examined the defendant’s remaining arguments and *523find them to be without merit *(see, People v Serrano,*15 NY2d 304; *see also, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Eiber, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Stratton Nicolaides, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Numerex Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Numerex Corp.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Stratton Nicolaides

Stratton Nicolaides

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer



Dated: April
30, 2013





I, Alan Catherall, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Numerex Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Numerex Corp.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Alan Catherall

Chief Financial Officer





Dated: April
30, 2013
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 3 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of obligations under the 

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the obligation of any amount 

4 exceeding the amounts obligated as described in 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HJ 3 RFS 

1 paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 115(a) of the Emer2 gency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 22, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1729

BASIL F. GRAHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BILL CLINTON, President,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 98-1733

BASIL F. GRAHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BILL BLACK; LARRY SEIGLER; JOHN SHERIDAN;

TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

No. 98-1756

BASIL F. GRAHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARRY COX,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-162-3, CA-98-163-3, CA-98-164)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Basil F. Graham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Basil F. Graham filed three civil actions. In No. 98-1729,

Graham filed a complaint against President Clinton, and in No. 98-

1733 and 98-1756, Graham filed a complaint against his former

employers. The district court dismissed each complaint without

prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Graham v. Clinton, No. CA-98-162-3; Graham v.

Black, No. CA-98-163-3; Graham v. Cox, No. CA-98-164 (E.D. Va. May

7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 CHANGE IN CONTROL  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
    Effective Date
  provided however




---



##### 



Change in Control
  provided
    Other Employment Agreement provided however
 2




---



##### 



Employment Period
 Terms of Employment
 Position and Duties
     Compensation
 Base Salary
 3




---



##### 



Annual Bonus 1 2
 Incentive, Savings and Retirement Plans
 Welfare Benefit Plans
 Expenses
 Fringe Benefits
 Vacation
 4




---



##### 



Termination
 Death or Disability provided
 Cause
 Good Reason
     5




---



##### 



provided provided further
  Notice of Termination
 Date of Termination provided however
 Obligations of the Company upon Termination
 Death
 6




---



##### 



Disability provided however
 Termination for Cause; Termination by Employee Other than for Good Reason
 Termination for Good Reason; Termination by the Company Other than for Cause, Death or
Disability
    7




---



##### 



provided however
 provided however
 8




---



##### 



provided however
 Previously Deferred Compensation
 Non-exclusivity of Rights
 Full Settlement
 9




---



##### 



Certain Additional Payments by the Company
    10




---



##### 



provided however provided however further provided
  11




---



##### 



Confidential Information and Company Policies
 Successors
    Arbitration
 12




---



##### 



Legal Expenses provided however
 Miscellaneous
   
  st
    13




---



##### 



/s/ Daryl J. FaulknerDARYL J. FAULKNERDIGENE CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Vincent J. NapoleonName:
    
    Vincent J. NapoleonTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President and General Counsel
 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5


   <S>                                <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-2000       SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-2000       SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                              534097           3416490
<SECURITIES>                             0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0              4112
<ALLOWANCES>                             0                 0
<INVENTORY>                              0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    543102           3489405
<PP&E>                             2641250           2050115
<DEPRECIATION>                           0            860732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4163102           6822126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               589452            271495
<BONDS>                                  0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0                 0
<PREFERRED>                              0                 0
<COMMON>                              2896              2888
<OTHER-SE>                         1925256           6183746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       4524608           6822126
<SALES>                                  0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1668534             26965
<CGS>                                    0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         8341                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   5698237           5188027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  285714              1862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (4274387)         (4860079)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0                 0
<CHANGES>                                0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (4274387)         (4860079)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (3.69)            (4.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (3.69)            (4.21)




</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6511
JOHN THOMAS HALL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1243-13JC) Submitted: June 17, 1997 Decided: July 24, 1997Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Thomas Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hall v. Beeler , No. CA-96-1243-13JC (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Applied  NeuroSolutions,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
David Ellison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

                                      /s/ David Ellison
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      David Ellison, Chief Financial Officer
                                      March 18, 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          35,108
<SECURITIES>                                    21,153
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,219
<PP&E>                                           1,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,696
<BONDS>                                            908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,569
<SALES>                                         27,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,702
<CGS>                                            8,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,164)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>