alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12




              BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                        Computation of Ratio of Earnings
                                to Fixed Charges
                             (Amounts in thousands)



                                                   Fiscal Year Ended
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                        October 3,  September 27, September 28,
                                           1998         1997          1996     
                                       -----------  ------------  -------------
                                                                 
Income before income taxes ...........  $  130,012    $  96,371     $  75,350  
Interest expense .....................      59,544       60,062        65,936  
Imputed interest on rent expense .....       5,096        4,938         5,006  
                                        ----------    ---------     ---------  
        Total earnings ...............  $  194,652    $ 161,371     $ 146,292  
                                        ----------    ---------     ---------  
                                                                 
Interest expense .....................  $   59,544    $  60,062     $  65,936  
Imputed interest on rent expense .....       5,096        4,938         5,006  
                                        ----------    ---------     ---------  
        Total fixed charges ..........  $   64,640    $  65,000     $  70,942  
                                        ----------    ---------     ---------  
                                                                 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...         3.0          2.5           2.1  
                                        ==========    =========     =========
HARBORSIDE HEALTHCARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
       COMPARATIVE NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE CALCUALTION
 THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND 1996
        (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                             

                                       For the three          For the six
                                       months ended           months ended
                                       September 30,          September 30, 
                                      1995        1996       1995        1996 

Net income                                     $ 1,410

Pro forma income before
 extraordinary loss                $   181                $   189     $ 1,796
Extraordinary loss, net                 -                      -       (1,318)
Pro forma net income               $   181                $   189     $   478

 Weighted average number of 
  common and common equivalent
  shares                         4,425,000   8,016,000  4,425,000   5,852,000


Primary and Fully Diluted Amounts
 Per Share:

  Net income                                   $  0.18

  Pro forma net income  
   before extraordinary loss      $  0.04                 $  0.04     $  0.31
  Extraordinary loss, net              -                       -        (0.23)
  Pro forma net income            $  0.04                 $  0.04     $  0.08

  
Weighted average number of shares
 and common stock equivalents:

 Weighted average number of
  common shares                 4,400,000    8,000,000  4,400,000   5,832,000
 
 Additional shares from assumed
  exercise of stock options
  granted with exercise price 
  below initial public 
  offering price                   25,000       16,000     25,000      20,000

  Total number of shares used to
  calculate Primary and Fully 
  Diluted Net Income per Share  4,425,000    8,016,000  4,425,000   5,852,000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service. 

# ACTION:

Correction. 

                    Notice is hereby given in accordance with provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 43 CFR 10.9, of the completion of an inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects in the possession of the Anthropological Studies Center (ASC), Archaeological Collections Facility, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA; and in the control of the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), Sacramento, CA.                     **This notice corrects the contact address of the Notice of Inventory Completion published August 16, 2000. The last paragraph of the August 16, 2000 notice is corrected as follows:**                    This notice has been sent to officials of the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria, California. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with these human remains should contact Tina Biorn, Environmental Program, Department of Transportation,                     **P.O. Box 942094 (M.S. 19)**                    , Sacramento, CA 94274-0001, telephone (916) 653-0013, before August 16, 2000. Repatriation of the human remains to the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria, California may begin after that date if no additional claimants come forward.                 

Dated: November 17, 2000. 

John Robbins, 

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnerships.

[FR Doc. 00-30846 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011451
<NAME> MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (360)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,049
<PP&E>                                           7,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,906)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,545
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,275
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,629
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,401
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (396)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                       615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,388
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                        PERITUS SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC.

             STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                          --------------------
                                                            1999       1998
                                                          ---------  ---------
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>
Net loss, as reported.................................... $  (1,959) $  (3,358)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders............. $  (1,959) $  (3,358)
                                                          ---------  ---------
Weighted average shares outstanding-Basic................    16,345     15,985
Adjustments thereto:
  Shares attributable to common stock equivalents........       --         --
                                                          ---------  ---------
Weighted average shares outstanding-Diluted..............    16,345     15,985
                                                          ---------  ---------
Net loss per share:
  Basic.................................................. $   (0.12) $   (0.21)
                                                          =========  =========
  Diluted................................................ $   (0.12) $   (0.21)
                                                          =========  =========
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6913-6]


Notice of Settlement Extension: National Ambient Air Quality 
Standard; Sulfur Oxides Remand

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of settlement extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. 
Circuit remanded EPA's decision to not revise the National Ambient Air 
Quality Standard for sulfur oxides for further explanation by EPA. 
American Lung Association v. Browner, 134 F. 3d 388 (D.C. Cir. 1998). 
Subsequently, the American Lung Association (ALA) and EPA agreed that 
EPA would propose a response to the court's remand by summer, 1999 and 
that EPA would finalize its response to the remand by the end of the 
year 2000. In exchange, ALA agreed to not file a petition for rehearing 
en banc with the court and to not pursue any mandatory duty or 
unreasonable delay claims regarding the remand prior to January, 2001.
    In September 1999, EPA and ALA met to discuss the status of the 
remand and agreed to extend the summer, 1999 deadline until January 15, 
2000.
    Since that time EPA and ALA have continued discussions and EPA has 
continued to work on the remand. As a result, EPA and ALA have agreed 
that by the end of 2000, EPA will publish a notice in the Federal 
Register describing the status of the remand and related activities and 
soliciting appropriate comment. For its part, ALA has agreed not to 
pursue any mandatory duty or unreasonable delay claims regarding the 
remand prior to January, 2001.

    Dated: December 1, 2000.
Anna Wolgast,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-31333 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
exv10w2



 







EXHIBIT 10.2



ADDENDUM TO THE




CENTRUE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

DATED OCTOBER 9, 2003





     THIS ADDENDUM shall be attached to and made a part of the Incentive Stock Option Agreement
(the “Agreement”) between Centrue Financial Corporation and Keith M. Roseland dated October 9, 2003
under the terms of the Centrue Financial Corporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).
Effective as of April 21, 2005, the Agreement is revised as follows:




	1.  	Section 4 of the Agreement is revised in its entirety to provide the following:
	 
	   	      “4.      This Option shall vest in equal parts on each anniversary of the date of
this Agreement such that on the first anniversary of this Agreement, the Optionee
shall be vested in one fifth (1/5) of the Shares represented by the Option granted
hereby as reflected below:





	 	 	 
	Date 	 	Number of Shares Vested
	October 9, 2004
	 	500
	October 9, 2005
	 	500
	October 9, 2006
	 	500
	October 9, 2007
	 	500
	October 9, 2008
	 	500







	   	     Continuation of Vesting upon Retirement. In the event of Optionee’s
retirement from the Company, this Option shall continue to vest pursuant to the
above-listed vesting schedule.”
	 
	2.  	Section 5 of the Agreement is revised in its entirety to provide the following:
	 
	   	     “(a)      Term of Option. This Option may not be exercised more than the
(10) years after the date of grant.
	 
	   	     (b)
      Death of Optionee. In the event of Optionee’s death prior to the
exercise in full of this Option, the Optionee’s beneficiary, executor, administrator
or personal representative, shall have the right to exercise the Option within a
period of twelve (12) months after the date of such death to the extent that the
right was exercisable at the date of death, and the unvested portion of the Option
shall expire as of the date of death.”





     The parties hereby acknowledge that as a consequence of the foregoing changes to the
Agreement, that the Option shall no longer be treated as an incentive stock option for tax purposes
and that the Option shall be treated as a non-qualified stock option, for all purposes, for the
remainder of its term.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the date set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	CENTRUE FINANCIAL CORPORATION	 	KEITH M. ROSELAND
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Its:
EXHIBIT
10.2


 


MODIFICATION TO
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


WHEREAS, on January 1,
1995, Lee Pharmaceuticals (“Maker”) and Lee Foundation (“Holder”) entered into
an agreement (“Note”) whereby Lee Pharmaceuticals was to pay to Lee Foundation
the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties
thereto desire to modify said Note;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the
parties modify said Note as follows:


 


1.       The
maturity date of the Note is extended from January 1, 2005, until January 1,
2010.


 


2.       This
Note may be extended for an additional five years beyond the maturity date at
the option of Lee Pharmaceuticals.


 


3.       All
other terms and conditions of the Note remain the same.


 


 


	
  February 24,
  2005

  	
   

  	
  RONALD
  G. LEE

  
	
  Date

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals –
  Ronald G. Lee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  February 24,
  2005

  	
   

  	
  MICHAEL
  L. AGRESTI

  
	
  Date

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals –
  Michael L. Agresti
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

VICTOR KEENAN LEMMONS, JR.,

Petitioner

v.

JACK DANERI, ESQ.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 105 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of December , 2019, the “Application for Extraordinary

Relief/Suspension of the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus” is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROFESSIONALS
INSURANCE COMPANY MANAGEMENT GROUP AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE MONTH
PERIOD THEN ENDED.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           278,205
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,703
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      450
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 294,887
<CASH>                                           2,059
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  10
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,989
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                222,363
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             25,424
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  14,895
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,506
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   359,989
<PREMIUMS>                                      12,391
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,172
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (36)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      54
<BENEFITS>                                      10,484
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                       841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 219,919
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             14,565
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (4,181)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  19
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 8,139
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                222,363
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**RULE 13a - 14(b) CERTIFICATIONS OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officers of Source InterlinkCompanies, Inc. (the “Corporation”) hereby certify that the Corporation’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 
|   |   | Date: December 10, 2007              |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                      |
|   |   | /s/ MICHAEL R. DUCKWORTH                  |
|   |   | Name: Michael R. Duckworth                |
|   |   | Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|   |   |                                      |
|   |   |                                      |
|   |   | /s/ MARC FIERMAN                          |
|   |   | Name: Marc Fierman                        |
|   |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer            |

 

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11 - 7328

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DEAN BLACKWOOD , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00135

- RDB
- 1; 1:10

- cv - 01306

- RDB; 1:10

- cv - 01645

- RDB; 1:10

- cv - 3609

- RDB )

Submitted : February 16, 2012 Decided: March 5 , 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismisse d by un published per curiam opinion
. Dean Blackwood, Appellant Pro Se. Mushtaq Zakir Gunja, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

Dean Bl ackw ood seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order s denying his motions for post
- conviction relief under 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the Uni ted States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period unde r Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court ’ s order s w ere entered on the docket

on December 9, 2010 , and January 7, 2011 . The notice of appeal was filed on September 29, 2011
. * Because Blackwood failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We also

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3

deny Blackwood’s pending motions seeking the release of documents from the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED