alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Global Digital Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Sullivan, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, David A. Loppert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                    



|/s/ RICHARD J. SULLIVAN                                          | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Richard J. SullivanChief Executive OfficerDate: January 16, 2015 | 
|                                                                 | 
|/s/ DAVID A. LOPPERT                                             | 
|Chief Financial OfficerDate: January 16, 2015                    | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global Digital Solutions, Inc. and will
be retained by Global Digital Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice C., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered July 25, 1988, adjudicating him a youthful offender, after a nonjury trial at which he was found guilty of sodomy in the first degree (two counts), and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant engaged in deviant sexual intercourse, by forcible compulsion, with another person less than 11 years of age *(see,*Penal Law § 130.50). Clearly this conduct endangered the welfare of that victim and his young companion *(see,*Penal Law § 260.10).

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Minor inconsisten*507cies in the testimony of two young boys present questions of credibility and the weight to be accorded such testimony *(see, People v Di Girolamo,*108 AD2d 755; *People v Williams,*123 AD2d 897). Resolution of issues of credibility as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88; *People v Akgun,*139 AD2d 654). We find that the court’s determination was supported by the record. Lawrence, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70878-70879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0465]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Veterans 
Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has 
submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA 
submission describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection 
instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise 
McLamb, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8030 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0465.''

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
    Title: Student Verification of Enrollment, VA Form 22-8979.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0465.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: The form is used by students in certifying attendance and 
continued enrollment in courses leading to a standard college degree or 
in non-college degree programs. VA uses the information to determine 
the student's continued entitlement to benefits. VA Form 22-8979 serves 
as proof of continued enrollment. It obtains certification of actual 
attendance by the student and verification of that student's continued 
enrollment before VA release payment.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on August 17, 2000 at page 50276.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 146,000 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 4 minutes.

[[Page 70879]]

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 365,000.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,190,000.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-7316. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 
2900-0465'' in any correspondence.

    Dated: November 2, 2000.

By direction of the Secretary:
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 00-30299 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00340

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 00340\00340_Part A.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00340\00340_Part B.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00340\00340_Part C.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00340\00340_Part D.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 00340\00340_Part H.XLS Plant submitted survey file

00340\Certification Statement_00340.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00340\Supporting Documentation\00340_Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00340\Supporting Documentation\00340_Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00340\Supporting Documentation\00340_Map-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00340\Supporting Documentation\Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00340\Correspondence with Plant #340.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

x 00340\00340_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00340\00340_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP OF 

JOHN V. WALTER, AN ALLEGED 

INCAPACITATED PERSON,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00206-CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court

of Dallas County, Texas 

(PR-20-01181-1)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellee J. Blake Walter’s motion to dismiss appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction and to abate proceedings and stay briefing schedule. The motion ONLY AS TO 

abate proceedings and stay briefing schedule is GRANTED. Therefore, the appeal is abated and 

the briefing deadlines are suspended pending the ruling of the motion to dismiss for lack of 

jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of March, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-452-000]

On November 30 and December 1, 2000, the staff of the Office of Energy Projects (OEP) will be conducting an inspection of Colorado Interstate Gas Company's (CIG) Raton Basin Expansion Project in Baca and Las Animas Counties, Colorado; Cimarron, Texas, and Beaver Counties, Oklahoma; and Morton County, Kansas. The site visit will start at 7:30 am on Thursday at the Ambassador Inn at Guymon, Oklahoma and follow the proposed route west. Sites to be visited include the Cimarron River crossings, the Santa Fe Trail crossing, the Cimarron National Grasslands, the proposed Kim Compressor Station, the Keyes Compressor Station, and possibly other locations. The site visit on Friday will start at 8 am at the proposed Trinidad Compressor Station site located off of U.S. Highway 160/350. Representatives of CIG will accompany the OEP staff.

All interested parties may attend, although those planning to attend must provide their own transportation.

For further information, please contact Laura Turner of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects at (202) 208-0916.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30201  Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERICK ROMAN, a/k/a Erick Javier Sierra, a/k/a Malian-T, 

a/k/a King Malian-T,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:09-cr-00598-AW-1; 8:12-cv-01234-AW)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Erick Roman, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Molly Elizabeth Thebes, Special 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland; Lara 

Marie Peirce, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Erick Roman seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Roman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of UnionBanCal  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
I.  Matson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 14, 2003
      -------------------



                                   By:  /s/ DAVID I. MATSON
                                      -------------------------
                                            David I. Matson
                                       Chief Financial Officer


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to  UnionBanCal  Corporation  and will be retained by  UnionBanCal
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
302 CERTIFICATION

I, William J. Delgado, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Global Digital Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

DATE: March 17, 2005              /S/ WILLIAM J. DELGADO
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  WILLIAM J. DELGADO
                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000871364
<NAME> 91A
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         226,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               404,834
<PP&E>                                       9,701,521
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,574,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,531,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,483,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,531,606
<SALES>                                      1,140,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,151,740
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  884,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                266,803
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            266,803
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   266,803
<EPS-BASIC>                                      22.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.25
 TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
(Conformed Copy  Includes all amendments through November 17, 2010)
  WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Section 1   DEFINITIONS
  Advertising




---



##### 



2 Advertising Materials
 Affiliate
 Cable Shopping Service i.e.
 Change of Control.
  provided, however,
    Control
 Excluded Affiliates provided, however




---



##### 



3 provided, however,
 Exhibition
 Interactive Delivery
 Law
 Licensed Advertising
 Licensed Services
 Multichannel Television provided, however
 NBC Competitor provided, however




---



##### 



4  NBC Marks
 New Marks
 Online Shopping Service
 Permitted Businesses
 Person
 Standards and Practices
 Term
 Territory
 VV Cable Shopping Service
 VV Online Shopping Service
 VV Permitted Businesses




---



##### 



5 Section 2  GRANT OF LICENSE
 Grant
 Sublicenses
  Restrictions




---



##### 



6   Retention of Rights
 provided, however
  Section 3  TERRITORY
 Territory
 Territory Outside the United States




---



##### 



7   Section 4  CONSIDERATION
 inter alia




---



##### 



8   Section 5  VVs OBLIGATIONS
 Licensed Services
 Compliance
 Quality of Services




---



##### 



9 ,
 Prohibited Services provided however
 Trademark Standards
 Notice
 Internet Business Primary Business Internet
Business




---



##### 



10  Section 6  ADVERTISING
 Right to Review e.g. Advertising Materials
 Approval provided however Licensed Advertising
 Samples
 NBCs Obligations




---



##### 



11  Section 7  OWNERSHIP
 Ownership
 No Adoption
 Goodwill
 Section 8  TRADEMARK PROTECTION
 Maintenance




---



##### 



12  Refusals
 Infringement
 Section 9  TERM
 Term provided, however
 Prompt Termination
 provided however




---



##### 



13 provided, however
 provided however
    provided however




---



##### 



14  Six Months Termination




---



##### 



15  Post-Termination
 Transition
 Section 10  REPRESENTATIONS/WARRANTIES
 By Each Party
 By NBC
 By VV
 VV-Yahoo Distribution Deal Yahoo
Shopping Site
 provided, however provided, further




---



##### 



16  Section 11  INDEMNITY
 By NBC Related Parties Losses
 By VV
 Notice of Claim Claimant Obligor Claim provided
 Defense provided
 provided provided further




---



##### 



17   Section 12  MISCELLANEOUS
 Assignment ab initio
 Amendment
 Waiver
 Notices




---



##### 



18  
  
  
  Entire Agreement
 Confidentiality Confidential Information




---



##### 



19  Recipient Discloser provided
 Cumulative Remedies
 Governing Law
   Service of Process; Dispute Resolution




---



##### 



20   Severability
 Construction
 Counterparts




---



##### 



21  VALUEVISION MEDIA, INC.By:
    /s/ Nathan E. FagreNathan E. FagreSenior Vice President & General CounselNBC Universal, Inc.By:
    /s/ Jay BockhausJay BockhausSenior Vice President, Business Development