alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      160,528
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               113,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (9,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 205,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            470,233
<PP&E>                                       16,814
<DEPRECIATION>                               (4,499)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              485,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       539,233
<BONDS>                                     201,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      3,410
<OTHER-SE>                                 (258,832)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                485,728
<SALES>                                     208,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            208,607
<CGS>                                        85,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               208,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (91,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (91,202)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (91,202)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           27754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   651354
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                784168
<PP&E>                                         2713800
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3561974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1467010
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         98148
<OTHER-SE>                                     (50963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3561974
<SALES>                                        3659876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3931576
<CGS>                                          2789784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4075282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                499000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              251045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (871150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (872750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (872750)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Charles T. Goodson, certify that:   1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of PetroQuest Energy, Inc.;   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;   4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and   5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Charles T. Goodson
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
    GOLD INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
    REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDING  DECEMBER  31,  1996 AND IS
    QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                  2,599
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       4,465,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                         9,429,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   15,008,884
<PP&E>                                              5,851,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                      2,044,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     19,824,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               9,210,629
<BONDS>                                               137,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                            7,477,939
<OTHER-SE>                                          2,998,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       19,824,713
<SALES>                                             5,572,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    5,572,276
<CGS>                                               4,595,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       5,964,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    113,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (504,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (192,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (312,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (312,503)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.09)

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
November 7, 2007

| |  | By: |  | /s/DAVID I. MATSONDavid I. Matson Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Order entered January 27, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00217
- CV VSDH VAQUERO VENTURE , LTD., Appellant

V. KEN GROSS AND BETSY GROSS, Appellee s On Appea l from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 09
- 05232
- A



### O RDER Before the court is Appellant’s Emergency Motion to Continue January 28, 2020 Oral Argument Hearing. We advise the parties that they need not appear at o ral argument on Tuesday January 28, 2020 and that we will enter a further order disposing of Appellant’s motion at
another time.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK PRESIDING JUSTICE
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 165 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an element in preseparation 

counseling for members of the Armed Forces on assistance and support 

services for caregivers of certain veterans through the Department of 

Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2017 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an element 

in preseparation counseling for members of the Armed 

Forces on assistance and support services for caregivers 

of certain veterans through the Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Caregiver Program In5 formation Dissemination Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 165 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELEMENT IN PRESEPARATION COUNSELING FOR 

2 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ON AS3 SISTANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR 

4 CAREGIVERS OF CERTAIN VETERANS 

5 THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

6 AFFAIRS. 

7 Section 1142(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new para9 graph: 

10 ‘‘(18) A description, developed in consultation 

11 with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, of the assist12 ance and support services for family caregivers of el13 igible veterans under the program conducted by the 

14 Secretary of Veterans Affairs pursuant to section 

15 1720G of title 38, including the veterans covered by 

16 the program, the caregivers eligible for assistance 

17 and support through the program, and the assist18 ance and support available through the program.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Starlight Realty Associates, Appellant, v State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), entered August 18, 1989, which dismissed a petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking *307review of an administrative determination by Division of Housing and Community Renewal which upheld the District Rent Administrator’s overcharge determination and established the lawful stabilized rent on a prospective basis only, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A rational basis exists to support the agency’s determination and the court will not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency. *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222.) The owner’s argument that it had no notice of its obligation to supply all the leases back to the base rent is without merit. Even if the owner did not receive the final notice, the record shows it did receive two other notices requesting a complete rent history. We therefore hold that the Commissioner’s determination had a rational basis in fact and law and is neither arbitrary nor capricious. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ActiveCore  Technologies,  Inc.
formerly  IVP  Technology  Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ending  September  30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of the  undersigned  herby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in his  capacity  as an officer of the
Company, that:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:    December 22, 2004          By: /s/ Peter J. Hamilton
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Peter J. Hamilton
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ActiveCore Technologies,
Inc.  formerly IVP  Technology  Corporation  and will be retained by  ActiveCore
Technologies,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### ORR et al. v. STATE.

No. 21083.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 12, 1940.

R. S. Ragsdale, of Burkburnett, for appellants.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This is a bond forfeiture case.

The statement of facts does not show that the State offered in evidence, upon the trial of the case, the bond upon which *598the forfeiture was predicated; nor does same appear in the transcript.

The appellants answered by general demurrer and general denial. The State was, therefore, under the burden of introducing in evidence the bail bond, in order to be entitled to judgment. White v. State, 101 Tex.Cr.R. 505, 276 S.W. 274; Baker v. State, 21 Tex.App. 359, 17 S.W. 256.

It follows that the judgment is not supported by the evidence.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
July 31, 2013

Mr. Benjamin Magro Coastal Helicopters, Inc. 141 Peabody Road Appleton, ME 04862

Dear Mr. Magro

This is in response to your July 9 , 2013 letter sent to the public docket ( No. FAA

- 20 1 1

- 1246 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf o f Coastal Helicopters, Inc. ( Coastal Helicopters ) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR) . That exemption, if granted, would allow Coastal Helicopters to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one testing progr am

.

On July 15, 2013 , the FAA published the Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs

final r ule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on

- demand operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations to combine the drug and alcohol testing required for each operation into one testing program . A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information.

If you have any questions, please contact the FAAs Drug Abatement Division at (202) 267

- 8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov

. Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### CARLTON v. STATE.

No. 16432.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1934.

Rehearing Denied March 14, 1934.

*85H. T. Brown, of Jacksonville, and Perkins & Perkins, of Busk, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

Officers, having a search warrant, searched appellant’s place and found a quantity of beer and also a quantity of home-brew. Samples of both kinds of liquor were analyzed by a chemist who testified that the beer contained 3 per cent, of alcohol by volume, and' the home brew contained 8 per cent, of alcohol by volume. The charge against appellant was the possession of potable liquor containing in excess of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume. We have no doubt as to the sufficiency of the facts to support the conclusion of guilt.

Four bills of exception are found in the record. Bill No. 1 complains of the lack of legal evidence to support the conviction; the. exact point being that the chemist who analyzed the samples of liquor was not sufficiently qualified. We think to the contrary. The witness had been a chemist and bacteriologist with thirteen years of actual experience and practice in Dallas and Tyler. He disclosed the extent of his study. We think the bill without merit.

Bill No. 2 discloses a general objection to the affidavit and search warrant as being insufficient in law to authorize a search of appellant’s premises. The affidavit and search warrant are not made a part of the bill, but we have examined same as they appear in the statement of facts. The building and premises to b© searched was a store and barbecue stand. The facts relied upon by the makers of the affidavit as basis for their belief that the law was being violated, as set forth in the affidavit and search warrant, appear to be sufficient. We think this bill without merit.

There is a bill complaining of the fact that the officers found a number of containers, bottles, and jars with some small quantity of whisky in them. We see no injury from this. Appellant was given the lowest penalty, and the evidence of his guilt appears to be not disputed.-

Finding no error in the record, the judg-meat is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
10.9




[State
Inspections of Texas, Inc. Letterhead]




 

March 31,
2005







Mr. Rich
Parlontieri

President,
CEO

Speedemissions,
Inc.

1029
Peachtree Parkway North

Suite
310

Peachtree
City, GA 30269





		RE:	Outstanding
      Indebtedness of Speedemissions, Inc.






Dear
Rich:




This
letter confirms that State Inspections of Texas, Inc. (the “Company”) has agreed
to extend the date that payments are to begin under the $1,285,000 Secured
Promissory Note dated December 30, 2004 (the “Note”), until September 1, 2005.
Payment dates shall be carried forward from that date. By execution of this
letter, the Company does not waive any of its rights under any other related
transaction documents.







Sincerely,

 

/s/ Debra
Price








Debra Price










Agreed
and Accepted this

31st day
of March, 2005




 

By: 
/s/ Richard Parlontieri






Name:
Rich Parlontieri

Title:
President and CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                         201,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,391,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                   465,000
<INVENTORY>                                 18,509,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,587,458
<PP&E>                                      21,499,751
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,889,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,248,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,714,897
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,332
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,014,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,248,979
<SALES>                                    107,068,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           107,068,508
<CGS>                                       66,184,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,332,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (955,319)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,196,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,311,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,688,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,622,839
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,622,839
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60


</TABLE>