alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. M. RADFORD GROCERY CO. v. WEDDLE et al.

No. 3959.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 20, 1940.

W. E. Lessing, of Abilene, for appellant.

J. B. Cotten and John J. Watts, both of Crane, for appellees.

PRICE, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted in the County Court of Crane County by C. A. Weddle and others against J. M. Radford Grocery Company and another. Plaintiff sought to restrain the enforcement of a judgment of the Justice’s Court, Precinct No. 1, of Taylor County. Judgment was rendered permanently restraining the defendant Grocery Company (appellant here) from enforcing the judgment of the Taylor County Justice’s Court, which was in its favor and against appellees. . From this judgment the defendant Radford Grocery Company has duly perfected this appeal.

The petition of the plaintiff shows that the judgment, the enforcement of which was sought to be restrained, was rendered on the 22d day of April, 1938, but does not allege the amount thereof. It purports -to have been rendered against appellees in a proceeding under Art. 3825, R.S., wherein appellant claimed that appellee Weddle, as Constable of Crane County, Precinct No. 1, failed to take proper steps as to an execution placed in his hands by appellant, which ran in favor of appellant. It might be added here that the appellees other than Weddle are sureties on Weddle’s official bond as Constable. The agreed statement of facts shows that the judgment was in the sum of $116.18.

This- case must be disposed of on the question of jurisdiction. In our opinion, under the Constitution, the County Court was without power to render the judgment appealed from.

The County Court of Crane County has no appellate jurisdiction over the judgment of a Justice’s Court of Taylor County. Plowever, the jurisdiction sought to be exercised here is original and not appellate.

A county court, independent of its appellate jurisdiction, is without power to enjoin the enforcement of the judgment of a Justice’s Court, whether same be void or voidable, unless the amount in controversy exceeds $200. Constitution, Section 16 of Article 5, Vernon’s Ann.St.; DeWitt *314County v. Wischkemper, 95 Tex. 435, 67 S.W. 882; U. O. Colson Co. v. Powell, Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W.2d 405; Boyd v. Adcock, Tex.Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 743; Dr. Le Gear Medicine Co. v. Hairston, Tex.Civ.App., 62 S.W.2d 385.

Here it is clear the amount in controversy is less than $200.

We have confined ourselves to a mere citation of the applicable provisions of the Constitution. There is in 12 Texas Law Review, p. 457, an interesting discussion of the power of the County Court to issue writs of mandamus and injunction.

It is ordered that the judgment of the County Court is in all things reversed, the injunction dissolved, and that the cause be dismissed.
First Annual Roundtable

on Treasury Markets

and Debt Management

Speaker Biographies

Agenda

Friday, November 18, 2011

Cash Room, Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, D.C. 20220

Registration

8:00 - 8:45 AM

Welcome and Opening Remarks

8:45 - 9:00 AM

Mary Miller, Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets, Department of the Treasury

Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, Department of the Treasury

Presentation 1

9:00 - 10:00 AM

 Title: Decomposition of Risk and Liquidity in Nominals and TIPS

 Presenter: Luis Viceira, Harvard University

Discussants: Mike Pond, Barclays

 Matt Richardson, New York University

Presentation 2

10:00 - 11:00 AM

 Title: Anticipated and Repeated Shocks in Liquid Markets 

 Presenter: Hongjun Yan, Yale University

Discussants: Elizabeth Hammack, Goldman Sachs

 Pierre Collin-Dufresne, Columbia University

Break

11:00 - 11:15 AM
First Annual Roundtable

on Treasury Markets

and Debt Management

Speaker Biographies

Panel One

11:15 - 12:15 PM

 Title: What is the optimal debt structure for Treasury?

 Moderator: Colin Kim, Director of the Office of Debt Management

 Panelists: Lewis Alexander, Nomura

 John Campbell, Harvard University

 Peter Fisher, Blackrock 

Lunch

12:15 - 1:30 PM

 Speaker: Mary Miller, Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets, Department of the Treasury

Presentation 3

1:30 - 2:30 PM

 Title: Systemic Sovereign Credit Risk

 Presenter: Francis Longstaff, UCLA

Discussants: Chris Rokos, Brevan Howard

 Viral Acharya, NYU

Presentation 4

2:30 - 3:30 PM

 Title: Aggregate Demand for Treasury Debt

 Presenter: Annette Vissing-Jorgensen, Northwestern University

Discussants: David Greenlaw, Morgan Stanley

 Robin Greenwood, Harvard University

Break

3:30 - 3:45 PM

Panel Two

3:45 - 4:45 PM

 Title: How will GSE Reform, Basel 3, and Financial Regulatory Reform impact Treasury markets and debt 

 management in the future?

 Moderator: Matthew Rutherford, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Finance

 Panelists: Lou Crandall, Wrightson ICAP

 Arvind Krishnamurthy, Northwestern University

 Jeremy Stein, Harvard University

Closing Remarks

4:45 - 5:00 PM

Mary Miller, Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets, Department of the Treasury
March 24, 2015

Mr. David Michael Causa II

200 F Skip Zerbe Street

Mohnton, PA 19540

Dear Mr. Causa:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 5, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0321), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,David Lieberman, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The  registrant's other certifying  officer and I are  responsible  for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting; and


5. I have  disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the equivalent functions):
 
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 24, 2010/s/David LiebermanDavid LiebermanChief Executive Officer
#### GOODALE v. STATE.

No. 19725.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1938.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 1938.

R. C. Rowland and John J. Sargent, both of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and assessed six years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is here without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Az Európai Unió C 39A/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 39A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 60. évfolyam2017. február 7. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 39A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

60. évfolyam2017. február 7.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Hirdetmények |
| | KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK |
| | Európai Bizottság |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | Közösségi növényfajta-hivatal — Pályázati felhívás a Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal fellebbezési tanácsa elnöki tisztségének betöltésére (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

V   Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Európai Bizottság

2017/C 39 A/01

Közösségi növényfajta-hivatal — Pályázati felhívás a Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal fellebbezési tanácsa elnöki tisztségének betöltésére (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

V Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Európai Bizottság

| 7.2.2017 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 39/1

---

KÖZÖSSÉGI NÖVÉNYFAJTA-HIVATAL

Pályázati felhívás a Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal fellebbezési tanácsa elnöki tisztségének betöltésére

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

A Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal felvételt hirdet fellebbezési tanácsa elnöki tisztségének betöltésére.

A pályázóknak az Európai Unió valamelyik tagállamának állampolgárságával kell rendelkezniük.

Az elnököt a Bizottság által – a Hivatal igazgatási tanácsa véleményének kikérését követően – összeállított jelöltlistáról a Tanács jelöli ki. A díjazásra vonatkozó információk a fellebbezési tanács titkárságától (Community Plant Variety Office (Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal), 3 Boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02) szerezhetők be. A Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal és a Bizottság tiszteletben tartja az esélyegyenlőség elvét.

A teljes pályázati felhívás és az internetes jelentkezési lap a következő címen érhető el: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

A pályázatok beérkezési határideje 2017. március 8. (részletek a benyújtásra vonatkozó útmutatóban olvashatók).

---
**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the quarterly report of Auxilio, Inc. and Subsidiary (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
      Etienne Weidemann, Chief Executive Officer and Paul T. Anthony Principal
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:











(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and









(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of the Company.











Date:
      August 14, 2007




By:   /s/
      Etienne Weidemann


Etienne
      Weidemann, Chief Executive Officer







By:   /s/
      Paul T. Anthony


Paul
      T.
      Anthony, Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GROEN
BROTHERS AVIATION, INC. JUNE 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         211,818
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,200,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,415,693
<PP&E>                                         635,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                 211,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,839,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,660,802
<BONDS>                                        212,372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       208,794
<OTHER-SE>                                     757,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,839,113
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,694
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,891,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,795,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,889,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,889,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,889,602)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 158 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 158

To authorize the provision of financial assistance to Knoxville College 
for the construction of the Southeast Region African American Educator 
                               Institute.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the provision of financial assistance to Knoxville College 
for the construction of the Southeast Region African American Educator 
                               Institute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the Southeast Region African American 
Educator Institute Act''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED.

    (a) General Authority.--In recognition of the need to address the 
shortage of minority teaching professionals in the United States, the 
Secretary of Education is authorized to provide financial assistance, 
in accordance with the provisions of this Act, to pay all of the cost 
of construction, and related expenses, for the establishment of the 
Southeast Region African American Educator Institute at Knoxville 
College, located at Knoxville, Tennessee, to be used as a national and 
regional resource and education center.
    (b) Application Required.--No financial assistance may be made 
under this Act unless an application is made to the Secretary of 
Education at such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied 
by such information, as the Secretary of Education may reasonably 
require.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated 
$10,000,000 for fiscal year 1992 to carry out the provisions of this 
Act.
    (b) Availability.--Funds appropriated pursuant to the authority of 
subsection (a) shall remain available until expended.

                                 <all>
```
#### George Terry, Respondent, v Young Men’s Hebrew Association of Washington Heights, Inc., Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Careful Cleaning Contractors, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered October 25, 1989, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment *400against defendant as to liability only, and granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment against third-party defendant as to liability only, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, an employee of third-party defendant, Careful Cleaning Contractors, was injured when he fell three stories while cleaning a window on premises owned by defendant and third-party plaintiff Young Men’s Hebrew Association of Washington Heights, Inc. The record indicates that plaintiff leaned out of a third-floor window to clean its exterior when part of the window frame gave way. Plaintiff had not been provided with a safety belt, window anchors, safety line or other devices.

Pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), the defendant owner is liable as a matter of law. *(See, Yaeger v New York Tel. Co.,*148 AD2d 308.) The fact that plaintiff also sought recovery under section 202 of the Labor Law, specifically pertaining to "window cleaning”, does not preclude plaintiff from, relying on section 240. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch and Wallach, JJ.
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




COMPENSATION OF JAMES T. RYABY




     On February 10, 2005, OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) set the base annual salary for Dr.
James T. Ryaby for the year ending December 31, 2005 in accordance with his employment agreement
with the Company dated June 1, 2001. The 2005 base annual salary for Dr. Ryaby was set at
$235,000.
<PAGE>

                               CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

                                   EXHIBIT 23

<PAGE>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Wilmington Trust Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-43675, 333-04042, 333-69479, 333-80009, 333-37928, 333-61096 and 333-86748)
on Form S-8 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-69453 and 333-76332) on Form
S-3 of Wilmington Trust Corporation of our report dated March 1, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated statements of condition of Wilmington Trust
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003,
which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of
Wilmington Trust Corporation. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets in 2002 and SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities in 2001.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 10, 2004

                                   EXHIBIT 23
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOUTJE PANTOUW ; ELLY LAE W OR ANG, Pe titione rs, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-74105 Age n c y Nos. A079-609-520

A079-609-521 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2015 ** B e fore : LEAVY, C ALLAHAN, a nd M . SM ITH, C i rc uit Judge s. Joutje Pantouw a

nd Elly La e W o rang, na

tive s a nd c itiz e ns of Indone sia , pe tition for re vie w of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing the i r m otion to re c onside r. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e 

# F IL ED MAY20 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re vie w for a

buse of disc re t ion thede nia l of a m otion to re c onside r. C

anoMe r ida v . IN

S , 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th C i r. 2002). W e dism i ss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r pe titione rs’ c onte ntions re late d to a sy lum and e quita

ble tolling of the

one -y e ar filing re q

uire m e nt be c a

use the y fa ile d to ra ise the m to the B IA. Se eBarron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004). The B IA de nie d pe t itione rs’ m otion to re c onside r, finding they fa ile d to de m onstra

te suffic ie nt individualiz e d risk of pe rse c ution to qualify for withholding of re m ova l. The B IA did not a buse its disc re tion in deny i ng the m o tion. Se e Mohamme d

v . Gonzale

s , 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th C ir. 2005); Halim v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 971, 979 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe titione r fa ile d to de m onstra te suffic ie nt e v ide nc e of individualiz e d risk of ha rm unde r a disfa vore d group a

na ly sis to e sta

blish a we ll-founde d fe ar of future pe rse c ution); W a k k a ry v . Holde r , 558 F.3d 1049, 1066 (9th C ir. 2009) (“ [a ] n a

pplic ant for withholding of re m ova l will ne e d to a d duc e a c onside ra bly la rge r qua ntum of individual iz e d-risk e vide n c e to pre va il tha n would an a s y l um a pplic ant” ). W e re

je c t pe titione rs’ c onte ntion tha t the i r m otion to re c o nside r should ha

ve be e n gra

nte d for subm ission of more e vide nc e . Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(b)(1). W e a lso re je c t pe titione rs’ re que sts tha t the c ourt

1 2 - 7 4 1 0 5 2re c o nside r its sta nc e re ga rding a patte rn or pra c tic e of pe rse c ution or re quire the a ge nc y to re visit this issue . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 2 - 7 4 1 0 5 3