alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-1069 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-197-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: CF-2013-31

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22 - 11147 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Jerrell Lee Modica,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20
- CR
- 125 - 1

**______________________________** Before **King, Haynes,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Jerrell Lee Modica has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Modica has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 11, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-11147 Document: 00516815723 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2023No. 22
- 11147

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-11147 Document: 00516815723 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2023
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1972 

To improve the monitoring and reporting of propane stocks and days of 

supply by the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration 

with regard to propane export volumes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2017 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To improve the monitoring and reporting of propane stocks 

and days of supply by the Administrator of the Energy 

Information Administration with regard to propane export volumes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION 

4 DATA REPORTING. 

5 Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Administrator of the Energy Information 

7 Administration shall ensure that any data published relat8 ing to days of supply of propane inventories in the United 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1972 IS

1 States include a calculation of the volume of exports of 

2 propane. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### BRUHN v. STATE.

No. 20711.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1939.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; penalty assessed at a fine of $125 and confinement in the county jail for ten days.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment seems to be in proper form. All matters of'procedure appearing regular,, the judgment will be affirmed.
D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James W. Morozzi
|Name:                |  | James W. Morozzi       
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | November 6, 2008       



1



---

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Thomas E. Morell
|Name:                |  | Thomas E. Morell       
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                |  | November 6, 2008       



2
Exhibit 10.20









Exhibit
10.20




FIRST
AMENDMENT TO

DEATH
BENEFIT AGREEMENT




This is
the First Amendment to a Death Benefit Agreement dated June 2, 1994, by and
between Kellwood Company (“Company”), a Delaware corporation, and _____________
(“Employee”), an Employee of Kellwood Company.




WHEREAS,
the Death Benefit Agreement was entered into at a time when the Employee was a
participant of the Kellwood Company Pension Plan, a qualified retirement plan;
and




WHEREAS,
the Death Benefit Agreement defined Retirement in accordance with the provisions
of the Pension Plan; and




WHEREAS,
the Company has since terminated its Pension Plan, but the parties agree that
the same definition of Retirement should continue.




NOW
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties agree to amend the
Death Benefit Agreement as follows:




1.    Paragraph
7 entitled “Retirement” shall be deleted in it entirety and a new paragraph 7
inserted as follows:




“Retirement.
Retirement is defined as a termination of an Employee’s employment (a) when the
Employee is either at least 65 years of age, or at least 55 years of age
and has
completed 15 years of continuous employment; or (b) when the Employee is
declared by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of Kellwood Company’s
Board of Directors to be a Retiree.”




2.    This
Amendment to the Death Benefit Agreement shall be effective as of December 8,
2000.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed below to indicate their consent and
agreement this _____ day of _________________, 2001.





	 	
      KELLWOOD
      COMPANY

	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
       
	
      By:                                                                            
      

	 	
           
      Hal J. Upbin

	 	
           
      Chairman, President & CEO

	 	 
	 	 
	 	
      EMPLOYEE

	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
      By:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011449
<NAME> SUBURBAN LODGES OF AMERICA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,699,300
<SECURITIES>                                55,872,645
<RECEIVABLES>                                  365,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,819
<INVENTORY>                                    887,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            65,704,406
<PP&E>                                     189,473,678
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,465,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             253,965,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,472,512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       154,292
<OTHER-SE>                                 211,153,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               253,965,813
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,045,469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,409,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,408,586
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,153,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,255,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,255,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved extension to tribal-state gaming compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has 
approved the Extension of the Tribal-State Compact for the conduct of 
Class III Gaming between the Coushatta Tribe and the State of Louisiana 
executed on November 16, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective on December 8, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: December 1, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-31305 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000943323
<NAME>                        TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, FUNDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  936
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               936
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          936
<BONDS>                                        145,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,936
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,238
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0<F1> 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0<F2> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
<FN>
<F1> Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other
<F2> Includes general & administration, depreciation & amortization and 
     development costs.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-49894) pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc. 1992 Equity
Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-09501) pertaining
to the Burlington Industries, Inc. 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-85629) pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc.
1998 Equity Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-38660)
pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc. Award Agreement dated June 1, 2000
and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-57756) pertaining to the
Burlington Industries, Inc. Award Agreement dated March 7, 2001 of our report
dated November 15, 2001, except for Notes A and G, as to which the date is
December 12, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Burlington Industries, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended September 29, 2001


                                                          s/s Ernst & Young LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
December 20, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76654-76655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 76655]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 8, 2000.
    Time: 12 pm to 1 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409, Rockville, MD 20852. 
(Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Sean O'Rourke, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol 
Abuse and Alcoholism National Instituted of Health, Suite 409, 6000 
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2861.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 28, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-31212 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### WILSON v. STATE.

No. 16714.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1934.

Rehearing Denied June 6, 1934.

L. D. Hartwell, of Greenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor ; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The evidence was, in substance, as follows: The sheriff of Hunt county arrested Sheffield King, Floyd Kelley, Marvin Lands, and appellant on a highway in Hunt county. The parties were transporting 31 gallons of whisky in a model A, Ford sedan, which was being driven by appellant.

Appellant failed to testify in his own behalf, and introduced no witnesses.

Appellant brings forward a bill of exception in which he complains of the testimony of the sheriff touching the result of the search. No search warrant had been issued. We deem it unnecessary to set out the circumstances relied upon to show probable cause. Prior to the search and discovery of the liquor, appellant and his companions made a declaration to the sheriff that there was whisky in the car. Under the circumstances, the testimony of the sheriff was properly received. Carter v. State, 113 Tex. Cr. R. 433, 22 S.W.(2d) 659; Gartman v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 137; Martin v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 54 S.W.(2d) 812; Porter v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 67 S.W.(2d) 292. Again, appellant’s cotransporters, testified to the fact that the whisky was in the automobile. This testimony was unobjected to, and no objection thereto would have been tenable. It follows that, if it should be conceded that the testimony of the sheriff was improperly received, and this is not conceded, the matter would present harmless error.

A careful examination of ail of appellant’s *256contentions leads us to the conclusion that error is not presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

 Appellant insists that we were wrong in holding admissible the testimony of the sheriff as to the result of a search of his car. The matter has been again examined. Every reason advanced in our original opinion for holding the testimony not improperly received seems well supported. It is the settled law. of this state that testimony on a given point admitted over objection will not be cause for reversal if the same or similar testimony be admitted without objection. Two or three other witnesses testified to the same facts as did the sheriff. No objection was made to their testimony.

The sheriff testified that, before he made any search of the car he was told, and also observed, that liquor was in the car. In such ease he had the right to search the car.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Quarterly Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Woods, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
May 13, 2010

By:

/s/ JOHN F. WOODS John F. Woods Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10–Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, William R. Sumser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ William R. Sumser                 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                  |
|   | William R. Sumser                     |
|   |                                  |
|   | Title:   Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   | Date:   August 12, 2002          |

 

----