alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 00N-1283]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Availability of 
Sample Electronic Products for Manufacturers and Distributors of 
Electronic Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Reporting and Recordkeeping 
Requirements and Availability of Sample Electronic Products for 
Manufacturers and Distributors of Electronic Products'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 13, 
2000 (65 FR 55262), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0025. 
The approval expires on November 30, 2003. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: November 28, 2000.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30830 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
EXHIBIT 23



WORLDWIDE RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.s 333-110661, 333-47659 and 333-47661 of Worldwide Restaurant Concepts, Inc. on Forms S-8
of our report dated July 15, 2004 (June 3, 2005, as to the effects of the restatement described in Note 2), which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement of the Companys consolidated
financial statements, appearing in this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Worldwide Restaurant Concepts, Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2004.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                         
|Los Angeles, California  



June 3, 2005
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Numerex Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stratton J.
Nicolaides, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates
and periods covered by the Report.
  This certificate is being furnished
solely pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed,
distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically
required by law.
  May
      8, 2008
              /s/ ­ Stratton J.
      NicolaidesStratton
      J. NicolaidesChief
      Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011449
<NAME> SUBURBAN LODGES OF AMERICA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      33,518,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  211,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,399,754
<PP&E>                                     134,424,239
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,457,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             169,538,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,680,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,776
<OTHER-SE>                                 127,671,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               169,538,107
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,452,158
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,716,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,708,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,551,899
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,156,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,156,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1587

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to exempt the triple base acreage

of the producers on a farm from the highly erodible land and wetland

conservation requirements of such Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. SMITH of Oregon,

Mr. ALLARD, and Mr. EMERSON) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to exempt the

triple base acreage of the producers on a farm from

the highly erodible land and wetland conservation requirements of such Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF TRIPLE BASE ACREAGE FROM

4 CERTAIN CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS.

5 (a) HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND CONSERVATION.—Sec6 tion 1212 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.

7 3812) is amended by adding at the end the following new

8 subsection:
2

HR 1587 IH

1 ‘‘(i) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

2 producers on a farm—

3 ‘‘(1) may designate the specific acres on the

4 farm that are in a quantity equal to the crop acre5 age base for a crop on the farm less the quantity of

6 payment acres for the crop under section

7 107B(c)(1)(C)(ii), 105B(c)(1)(C)(ii),

8 103B(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 101B(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Agri9 cultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445b10 3a(c)(1)(C)(ii), 1444f(c)(1)(C)(ii), 1444-

11 2(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 1441-2(c)(1)(C)(ii)); and

12 ‘‘(2) shall be exempt from the requirements of

13 this subtitle with respect to the specific acres that

14 are designated under paragraph (1).’’.

15 (b) WETLAND CONSERVATION.—Section 1222 of

16 such Act (16 U.S.C. 3822) is amended by adding at the

17 end the following new subsection:

18 ‘‘(k) PRODUCTION ON TRIPLE BASE ACREAGE.—

19 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the producers

20 on a farm—

21 ‘‘(1) may designate the specific acres on the

22 farm that are in a quantity equal to the crop acre23 age base for a crop on the farm less the quantity of

24 payment acres for the crop under section

25 107B(c)(1)(C)(ii), 105B(c)(1)(C)(ii),
3

HR 1587 IH

1 103(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 101B(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Agricul2 tural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445b-3a(c)(1)(C)(ii),

3 or 1444f(c)(1)(C)(ii), 1444-2(c)(1)(C)(ii), or 1441-

4 2(c)(1)(C)(ii)); and

5 ‘‘(2) shall be exempt from the requirements of

6 this subtitle with respect to the specific acres that

7 are designated under paragraph (1).’’.

8 (c) CROPS.—the amendments made by this section

9 shall be effective only for the 1993 through 1995 crops

10 of a commodity.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76655-76656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 28, 2000, 1 pm to 
November 28, 2000, 2:30 pm, NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which 
was published in the Federal Register on November 17, 2000, 65 FR 
69568-69570.
    The meeting times have been changed to 3:30 pm to 4:30 pm. The date 
and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.


[[Page 76656]]


    Dated: November, 28, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-31201 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6281

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL JEROME FELDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:07-cr-00203-TLW-1; 4:10-cv-70188-TLW)

Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 25, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jerome Felder, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; 

Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Jerome Felder seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion and his motion to reconsider. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See United States v. Felder, No. 4:07-cr-00203-TLW-1; 

4:10-cv-70188-TLW (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2011 & Dec. 9, 2011). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board will meet in closed session on March 7-8, 2001; May 16-17, 2001; and October 24-25, 2001, at the Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board will discuss interim findings and recommendations resulting from ongoing Task Force activities. The Board will also discuss plans for future consideration of scientific and technical aspects of specific strategies, tactics, and policies as they may affect the U.S. national defense posture.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(1)(1994), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: November 30, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-31241  Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of ESB Financial Corporation (the Registrant)
hereby certifies that the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





By: /s/ Charlotte A. ZuschlagCharlotte A. ZuschlagPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 12, 2007



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ESB Financial Corporation and will be retained by ESB Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WHITE v. SPARKS.

No. 12690.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

July 23, 1938.

For original opinion, see 118 S.W.2d 649.

J. L. Turner, of Dallas for appellant.

W. H. Reid; -of Dallas, for appellee.

YOUNG, Justice.

Upon consideration of the present record, affidavit of appellee and briefs of the parties, appellant’s motion for contempt is overruled without prejudice. Appellee’s counter propositions, challenging the validity of the temporary and mandatory injunction granted in connection with our disposition of this appeal under the original opinion heretofore filed, are overruled; however, the issuance of such injunction is conditioned upon appellant furnishing to the clerk of this court a bond, in terms as required by law and in the sum of $200. Although appellant is already under bond fixed by the trial court, in connection with the judgment appealed from to this court, yet by reason of the additional relief here granted on appeal, further security is proper in order to be well within the statutory requirements in matters of injunction. This feature .was inadvertently omitted from our original opinion, and is here made a part thereof, the same as if expressly provided for therein. Upon approval of such additional bond by the clerk of this court, a temporary writ of injunction, mandatory in nature, is accordingly ordered to issue, commanding appellee, Anita Sparks, to at once vacate the premises in suit; and to desist and refrain from interfering with the use, peaceable possession and enjoyment thereof by appellant, B. F. White, as prayed and as ordered in our original judgment.

Appellant’s motion is overruled without prejudice; appellee’s affirmative contentions in answer to said motion are also overruled.
# T HE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF HENDERSON C OUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2 7th
day of February, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF RUSTY BU RNETT ABNEY AND SAND EE

CAPRICE ABNE Y AND IN THE INTEREST OF BREEANA CAPRICE A BNEY AND

BRITTON STANLEY ABNE Y, CHILDREN

NO. 12

- 14

- 00243

- CV; Trial Court No . 2013C

- 0589

By per curiam opinion.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this a ppeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution

.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution ; and that this decision be certified to

the court below for observance. ”

WHE REAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justic e of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 12 th day of M ay, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Salvatore A. Vanno, as Commissioner of the Department of Codes Enforcement of the City of Utica, Respondent, v River Market Commodities, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Upstate Hide and Skin Co., Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff established that defendant Upstate Hide and Skin Co., Inc. operated an animal hide processing plant in violation of the city ordinance and a special zoning exception, which required that the operation be conducted entirely inside the building. Defendant used a dumpster and flatbed trailer situated outside the building to store animal hides and related waste for as long as 30 days. This created noxious odors and blood seepage constituting a public nuisance.

Acting on behalf of the City of Utica, plaintiff was entitled to a preliminary injunction based on defendant’s violation of the ordinance and zoning exception. The city, as a municipality, is not required to demonstrate special damage or compliance with the traditional three-pronged test for injunctive relief *(see, Moran v Village of Philmont,*147 AD2d 230, 234; *City of New York v Cincotta,*133 AD2d 244, 245; *Town of LaGrange v Giovenetti Enters.,*123 AD2d 688, 689-690; *City of New York v Bilynn Realty Corp.,*118 AD2d 511, 512-513). Defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J.—preliminary injunction.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Quarterly Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
November 6, 2008

By:

/s/ DAVID I. MATSON David I. Matson
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7827

In Re: DARUS ZEHRBACH,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CA-05-79; CR-00-33)

Submitted: January 27, 2006 Decided: February 9, 2006

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darus Zehrbach, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Darus Zehrbach has filed a motion for an order of

mandamus on an expedited consideration basis, alleging the district

court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to vacate his

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He seeks an order

from this court directing the district court to act. We find there

has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we

deny the motion to expedite and deny the mandamus petition. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 21.1

RADISYS CORPORATION

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                               |  |                              
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|SUBSIDIARY                                     |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
|Nihon RadiSys K.K.                             |  | Japan                        
|RadiSys Systems Technology (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. |  | China                        
|RadiSys (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.                   |  | Malaysia                     
|RadiSys Canada ULC                             |  | Canada                       
|RadiSys (UK) Limited                           |  | United Kingdom               
|RadiSys Convedia (Ireland) Limited             |  | Ireland                      
|RadiSys Technology (Ireland) Limited           |  | Ireland                      
|RadiSys Ireland Limited                        |  | Ireland                      
|RadiSys GmbH                                   |  | Germany                      
|RadiSys B.V.                                   |  | Netherlands                  
|RadiSys Israel Ltd.                            |  | Israel
# Fourth Court of Appea ls

San Antonio, Texas

March 4, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00975

- CV

IN RE Abelardo G. GONZALES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

On January 7, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining the trial

court had not set for hearin g or ruled on a motion he filed with the court in mid

- November 2018.

On January 16, 2019, this court denied relator’s petition because the motion had been pending

before the trial court for only about two months. On January 31, 2019, relator filed a moti on for

rehearing, again complaining of the trial court’s refusal to set his motion for a hearing or rule on

the motion.

Th is court requests a response from the respondent. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2; 52.9. Any

response must be filed in this court no lat er than March 19, 2019

.

It is so ORDERED on March 4, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017 FLI 001815 C3 , styled I n the Interest of M.A.G. and Z.A.G.,

Children , pending in the County Court at Law No 2

, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Missy Medary presiding.