alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1996 INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
THE  SCHEDULE IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                            20,437,000
<SECURITIES>                                      57,307,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     304,000
<PP&E>                                                94,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (50,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   164,401,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,044,000
<BONDS>                                          155,083,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             104,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         7,170,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     164,401,000
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      8,929,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     737,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 5,486,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (13,920,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (13,920,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (13,920,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.90)<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.90)<F1><F2>

<FN>
<F1>RESTATED FOR A 3-FOR-2 STOCK SPLIT BY WAY OF STOCK DIVIDEND TO BE PAID ON
      APRIL 14, 1998.
<F2>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
      STANDARDS NO.128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas J. Sutliff, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), ren*746dered December 11, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

The People concede that defendant was not adequately informed of his right to challenge any statement regarding a predicate felony conviction as required by CPL 400.21. Due to this failure to comply with the statutory procedures for determining second felony offender status, the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted for resentencing *(see, People v Snyder,*105 AD2d 553).

Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence; matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for resentencing; and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,295
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,759
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     43,482
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,758
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,666
<LOANS>                                        160,688
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,180
<DEPOSITS>                                     192,697
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,715
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,883
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,260
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 236,180
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,136
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,511
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    10
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,656
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,731
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,181
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,476
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      645
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,466
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,466
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.98
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,062
<LOANS-PAST>                                       147
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    960
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,543
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      579
<RECOVERIES>                                       163
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,772
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               645
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with this  Quarterly  Report  of  UnionBanCal  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
I.  Matson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  May 10, 2004




                                   By:         /S/ DAVID I. MATSON
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                                   David I. Matson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
----

**EXECUTIVE      EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

** **
**AUXILIO,      Inc., a Nevada corporation**

**   **
** **
** **
**.**

----

**.  **

----

** **
**:**

----

** **
** **

** **

----

----

**,**

----

**, **

** **
** **

----

**EXHIBIT      A**

**INCENTIVE      COMPENSATION PLAN**

| 1.   | The                Executive Bonus Plan will be based on 10% of EBITDA for 2008 and                2009.  The bonus due, if any, will be paid on an annual basis in                March based on the relevant 10K filed with the SEC.  The EBITDA                described in this Exhibit A is calculated as if the bonus to be paid                to                the Executives has not been paid and therefore the expense has not                been                accrued and counted as an expense on the Company’s income                statement. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                Executive Commission Plan will be based on 15% commission from net                cash                flow generated from equipment sales to customers. The commission                due, if                any, will be paid in the pay period following the payment of the                cash                amount due from the customer. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000872658
<NAME>                        ENEX 90-91 INCOME & RETIREMENT FUND-SERIES 1, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         11465
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29187
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               40652
<PP&E>                                         894954
<DEPRECIATION>                                 662611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          43877
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     229118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272995
<SALES>                                        92592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               92592
<CGS>                                          86869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18006)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Lynda L. Pitts, Chief Executive Officer of Regan Holding Corp., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Regan Holding Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 31, 2008

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts

Lynda L. Pitts

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 18.1

August 14,
2009

UnionBanCal
Corporation
400 California Street
San Francisco, California

Dear
Sirs/Madams:

At
your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, of the facts relating to the change in UnionBanCal Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (the "Company") annual goodwill impairment test date from
January 1st to April 1st. We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and other information furnished to us by appropriate officials of the Company, that the accounting
change described in your Form 10-Q is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

We
have not audited any consolidated financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2008. Therefore, we are unable to express, and
we do not express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q, on the related information furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on the financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2008.

Yours
truly,

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Francisco, California

---



QuickLinks
#### KIMBALL v. STATE.

No. 15878.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 8, 1933.

Otis Rogers,' of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction Is for passing a forged instrument ; punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
### The FAA sent, to AerSale 1/19/2011, the follo wing e-mail requesting clarification of a petition. In a related FAA telephone convers ation 1/20/2011 at 9:24 a.m. with Tiffany Kolb and Bruce Embree of AerSale, it was agreed that AerSale would re-submit their petition to clarify the petiti oned exemption’s timeframe reque sted (36 or 24 months, but not both), and to remove any mention of ex emption from 14 CFR part 21, which AerSale had not originally intended to request.

Subject: Koito seats exemption petition, Federal Docket no. FAA-2010-1134 From: Mark Forseth, ANM-113 Standardization Branch To: iso.nezaj@aersale.com 01/19/2011 02:24 PM

Dear Mr. Nesaj,
Re: the subject petition for exemption (dated Nov. 4, 2010) AerSale, Inc., submitted to the FAA, your petition makes reference to "Part 21, only as related to 

### §§ 25.561, 25.562, and 25.853." Jeff Gardlin, the technical specialist assigned to processing AerSale's exemption, assumes that this statement intends exemption from 21.183(d)(3).
Please confirm or correct our assumption, as the FAA requires explicit reference to the regulations from which you petition for exemption. We will add your reply to the subject docket as a matter of public record.
Best regards,

Mark Forseth Regulatory Technical Writer-Editor, ANM-113 Standardization Branch Transport Airplane Directorate Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 ph: 425-227-2796
#### FLOWERS v. WARLICK.

No. 3951.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 20, 1940.

J. T. Kelley, of Odessa, and Clyde E. Thomas, of Big Spring, for appellant,

Lawerence L. Barber, of Seagraves, and Berry, Warlick & Bunnenberg, of Vernon, for appellee.

PRICE, Chief Justice.

In this case plaintiff, L. G. Warlick, filed suit against Mrs. J. H. Flowers in the *275District Court of Gaines County to recover certain property situated in the town of Seagraves. The defendant, among other things, pleaded not guilty, and a cross action against plaintiff. The trial was to a jury and at the close of the evidence the court instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant as to plaintiff’s cause of action and the cause of action asserted by her in her cross action. Appeal was duly perfected to this court.

Appellant has failed to file a brief herein, and no assignments of error on behalf of appellant appear in the record. We have examined the record for fundamental error, and find that the judgment is sustained by the pleading and proof.

It is therefore ordered that the cause be in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1


 


ADDENDUM NO. 4


 


This ADDENDUM NO. 4 to the Agreement dated January 1,
2001, as amended by Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3, by and between PNGI CHARLES TOWN
GAMING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (“Employer”) and the West Virginia Union of
Mutuel Clerks, Local 553, Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO (“Union”)
(“the Agreement”) is entered into as of April 27, 2005.


 


WHEREAS, the Agreement expires by its terms on April 30,
2005;


 


WHEREAS, the parties are presently negotiating in
good faith the terms and conditions of a proposed new agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the Agreement
until May 16, 2005 during which time the parties agree to continue to
negotiate in good faith,


 


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as
follows:


 


1.                                       The Term of the Agreement is extended until
midnight May 16, 2005.


 


2.                                       Except as expressly modified in this Addendum
No. 4, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and
effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF AND INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND
the


 


INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK


 





















 


parties have signed this
Addendum No. 4 as of April 27, 2005.


 


	
  ATTEST:

  	
  PNGI CHARLES TOWN GAMING,
  LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   /s/Margaret A. Fineagan

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Albert Britton

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Albert Britton

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  General Manager

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ATTEST:

  	
  WEST VIRGINIA UNION OF
  MUTUAL

  
	
   

  	
  CLERKS, LOCAL 553, SERVICE
  EMPLOYEES

  
	
   

  	
  INTERNATIONAL UNION,
  AFL-CIO

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   /s/Margaret A. Fineagan

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/Randall Conrad

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Randall Conrad

  
	
   

  	
  Title: President Local 553

  



 


2
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 4, 2008*

#### WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC. VS. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS

(CC-08-234)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Charles P. Houdyschell Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $40,247.49 for the cost of medical services provided to an inmate at Mount Olive Correctional Center. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim in this amount and further states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in *Airkem Sales and Service, et al.*v. *Dept. of Mental Health,*8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.