alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Michael A. Ernst, Chief Financial Officer, of Prentiss Properties Trust (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”): 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section78o(d)); and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant. 

 

/s/ Michael A. Ernst 

Michael A. Ernst 

Chief Financial Officer 

August 14, 2003 

 

STATE OF TEXAS§ 

COUNTY OF DALLAS§ 

 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of August, 2003. 

 

/s/Lana Mann

Lana Mann 

August 14, 2003 

 

Notary Public 

My Commission Expires: 5/26/2005 

Official Seal 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, **or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,** has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*OPINION ISSUED JANUARY 18, 2008*

#### CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES VS. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS

(CC-07-355)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Charles P. Houdyschell Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $439,922.8lfor medical services rendered to inmates in the custody of respondent at Mount Olive Correctional Complex, St. Mary’s Correctional Center, Lakin Correctional Center, St. Anthony’s Correctional Center, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Pruntytown Correctional Center and Denmar Correctional Center, facilities of the respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, and further states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in *Airkem Sales and Service, et al.*vs. *Dept. of Mental Health,*8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30956]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Notice of Acceptance of Retrocession of Jurisdiction for the 
Tulalip Tribes, Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of the 
Interior by Executive Order No. 11435 of November 21, 1968 (33 FR 
17339) and redelegated to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8, I hereby accept as of 12:01 PST, November 21, 2000 
retrocession to the United States of partial criminal jurisdiction over 
the Tulalip Tribes, which was acquired by the state of Washington, 
pursuant to Public Law 83-280, 67 Stat. 588, 18 U.S.C. 1162, 28 U.S.C. 
1360.
    The retrocession herein accepted was offered by the Proclamation by 
the Governor of the state of Washington on January 14, 1997, and 
transmitted to the Secretary on February 18, 2000. By Resolution No. 
96-0167 dated November 2, 1996, the Tulalip Tribes requested that the 
state of Washington retrocede partial criminal jurisdiction to the 
tribes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Peter Maybee, Executive Officer, 
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Law Enforcement Services, 1849 C 
Street, NW, Mailstop 2607-MIB, Washington, DC 20240, telephone nubmer 
(202) 208-5758.

    Dated: November 29, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-30956 Filed 12-04-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
O rder filed August 15 , 2013

In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 187

- CV

__________ GEORGE MITCHELL , Appellant
V.
BIRDIE COOKS MITCHELL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 318th District Court Midland County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. FM54997

O R D E R Appellant, George Mitchell
, has filed an appeal in this cause. Upon being
notified that th e filing fees and the record were due, A ppellant filed in this court a
declaratio n of inability to pay costs. T he court reporter ha s filed a contest in this

court

. In addition to contesting Appellant’s indigence, the court reporter asserts that Appellant is not entitled to a free record because the appeal is frivolous. See
T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 13.003 (West 2002). P ursuant to T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 20.1(h)(4) and Section 13.003(a)(2) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, w e abate the appeal and refer both the indigence contest and the question of
frivolousness to the trial court for resolution

.2 The trial court is directed to comply with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 in conducting a hearing and determining whether A ppellant is indigent

. Unless a writt en order sustaining the contest is timely entered, A ppellant will be allowed to proceed without advance pa yment of costs. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(i) (4)

. We also abate the appeal for an additional reason: to allow the trial court to enter a final judgment. The district clerk, in the docketing statement filed in this court on July 1, 2013, indicated that a final judgment had not been filed. Our records reflect that a final judgment was due from the trial court on July 29, 2013.
We have not received the trial court’s final judgment. Consequently, we abate the appeal pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 27.2 to permit the trial court to enter a final judgment if it has not already done so . If a final, appealable judgment has not been entered by September 16, 201 3
, we may dismiss this appeal pursuant to T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 42.3. E xcept for “a few mostly statutory exceptions,” this court’s jurisdiction is limited to appeals from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).
The district clerk is directed to forward to this court on or before September 30 , 201 3
, a supplemental clerk’s record containing (1) any orders and findings entered by the trial court regarding th e indigence contest , (2) any orders and findings entered by the trial c ourt concerning the frivolousness of this appeal
, and (3) the decree of divorce or any other appealable order or judgment, if any, entered in this case by the trial court

. Th e appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental clerk’s record. This appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM August 15, 2013 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson, J.
# Official Journal L 286/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5730 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 286

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5730 September 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1011/2014 of 22 September 2014 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the models for submission of certain information to the Commission and the detailed rules concerning the exchanges of information between beneficiaries and managing authorities, certifying authorities, audit authorities and intermediate bodies | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1011/2014 of 22 September 2014 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the models for submission of certain information to the Commission and the detailed rules concerning the exchanges of information between beneficiaries and managing authorities, certifying authorities, audit authorities and intermediate bodies

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 289 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 289

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3360) to amend title 46, 
United States Code, to establish requirements to ensure the security 
and safety of passengers and crew on cruise vessels, and for other 
purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 
following correction: In section 4(b), strike 

              

``Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004'' the second 
place it appears and insert ``Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation 
Act of 2006''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 289

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a technical 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3360.
```
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1884 

To provide for joint reports by relevant Federal agencies to Congress 

regarding incidents of terrorism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for joint reports by relevant Federal agencies 

to Congress regarding incidents of terrorism, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reporting Efficiently 

5 to Proper Officials in Response to Terrorism Act of 2017’’ 

6 or the ‘‘REPORT Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DUTY TO REPORT. 

8 (a) DUTY IMPOSED.—Whenever an act of terrorism 

9 occurs in the United States, it shall be the duty of the 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1884 IS

1 Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, 

2 the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and, 

3 as appropriate, the head of the National Counterterrorism 

4 Center, to submit, within 1 year of the completion of the 

5 investigation concerning such act by the primary Govern6 ment agency conducting such investigation, an unclassi7 fied report (which may be accompanied by a classified 

8 annex) to Congress concerning such act. 

9 (b) CONTENT OF REPORTS.—A report under this sec10 tion shall— 

11 (1) include a statement of the facts of the act 

12 of terrorism referred to in subsection (a), as known 

13 at the time of the report; 

14 (2) identify any gaps in national security that 

15 could be addressed to prevent future acts of ter16 rorism; and 

17 (3) any recommendations for additional meas18 ures that could be taken to improve homeland secu19 rity, including potential changes in law enforcement 

20 practices or changes in law, with particular attention 

21 to changes that could help prevent future acts of ter22 rorism. 

23 (c) EXCEPTION.—The duty established under sub24 section (a) shall not apply in instances in which the Sec25 retary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1884 IS

1 Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or the 

2 head of the National Counterterrorism Center determines 

3 that the information required to be reported could jeop4 ardize an ongoing investigation or prosecution. In such in5 stances, the Secretary shall notify Congress of such prior 

6 to the first anniversary of the completion of the investiga7 tion described in such subsection. 

8 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘act of 

9 terrorism’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

10 3077 of title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-10214

_____________________

JOEL MASK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DONNIE R. ROGERS, Sgt.;

ERIC KARR, Cpl.;

DEON CLEMENTS, Lt.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas, Lubbock

(5:94-CV-226-C)

_________________________________________________________________

December 30, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the

district court erred in granting the appellees' summary judgment

motion with respect to Mask's claim for damages under 42 U.S.C. §

1983, which is based upon an arrest alleged to be without probable
 

1The district court also found that Heck v. Humphrey, 114

S.Ct. 2364 (1992), barred Mask's malicious prosecution claim and

that the record lacked facts to support Mask's claim of excessive

force. Mask does not brief these issues on appeal and they are,

therefore, considered abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County

Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

2

cause.1 The issue may be reduced to asking simply whether there is

a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the police had probable

cause to arrest Mask. 

The evidence produced at the summary judgment stage

established that the police officers responded to a domestic

disturbance call at the home of Mask's mother. The call involved

Mask's brother and was the second such call of the evening. While

at the residence to arrest Mask's brother, the police heard loud

shouting from within the house and, upon entering, found Mask

threatening his wife. Thereafter, Mask left the house and went to

the front porch where he and his brother engaged in a heated

argument that required police intervention. The officers

subsequently arrested Mask for fighting, disorderly conduct, loud

and profane language, apparent intoxication, assault and

threatening an officer. Mask disputed this account of the evening

but failed to bear his burden of presenting evidence raising a

genuine issue of material fact. Thus, because of the absence of a

genuine issue of material fact as to the presence of probable cause
3

to arrest, summary judgment in favor of the police officers was

appropriate.

We conclude, therefore, that, with respect to the Fourth

Amendment claim, the district court did not err in granting summary

judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

A F F I R M E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-37-001]

Take notice that on November 21, 2000, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an effective date of November 1, 2000:

First Revised Tariff Sheet No. 254

Original Sheet No. 255

Sheet No. 256-257

Equitrans states that these tendered sheets are filed in compliance with Order No. 587-L, issued in Docket No. RM96-1-014 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on June 30, 2000 and implements 18 CFR 284.(c)(ii), regarding the netting and trading of imbalances on Equitrans' system.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30738 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information from Trump Hotels & Casino
Resorts Holdings, L.P. This data has been extracted from the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six month period
ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000943322
<NAME> TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS HOLDINGS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         105,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,902
<INVENTORY>                                     13,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,142
<PP&E>                                       2,366,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                 414,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,390,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,906
<BONDS>                                      1,751,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,390,686
<SALES>                                        677,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               752,548
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  429,808<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,330<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,270
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             110,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (5,620)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,164)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other
<F2>Includes general & administration and depreciation & amortization
</FN>



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Digital Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, William J. Delgado, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.





                                  /S/  WILLIAM J. DELGADO
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  WILLIAM J. DELGADO
                                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


DATE:  March 17, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.