alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1779 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1779

 To repeal certain provisions of the Federal Switchblade Act to allow 
   domestic manufacturers to ship and sell their products to buyers 
located in other States and to permit the importation of certain knife 
                                 parts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2017

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal certain provisions of the Federal Switchblade Act to allow 
   domestic manufacturers to ship and sell their products to buyers 
located in other States and to permit the importation of certain knife 
                                 parts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom of Commerce Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS RELATED TO SWITCHBLADE KNIVES.

    (a) In General.--The Act entitled ``An Act to prohibit the 
introduction, or manufacture for introduction, into interstate commerce 
of switchblade knives, and for other purposes'' (commonly known as the 
``Federal Switchblade Act'') is amended by striking sections 1 through 
4 (15 U.S.C. 1241 et seq.).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Chapter 83 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 1716, by redesignating subsections (h), (j), 
        and (k) as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
            (2) in section 1716E(i), by striking ``section 1716(k)'' 
        and inserting ``section 1716(i)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The repeals made by this section--
            (1) shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act; 
        and
            (2) shall not apply with respect to any indictment, 
        convictions, sentencing, appeals, civil or criminal fines or 
        penalties obtained, forfeitures obtained, terms of 
        imprisonment, or any other enforcement actions or proceedings 
        occurring or commenced before the date of the enactment of this 
        Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1268 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1268

 To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit issuance of residential 
mortgages to any individual who lacks a Social Security account number.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2009

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida (for herself, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mrs. 
 Myrick, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Gallegly) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit issuance of residential 
mortgages to any individual who lacks a Social Security account number.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORTGAGES PROHIBITED FOR PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES OF INDIVIDUALS 
              WHO LACK SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 
1631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section:
``Sec. 140. Mortgages prohibited for principal residences of 
              individuals who lack Social Security account numbers
    ``Notwithstanding any provision of State law, no credit may be 
extended by any creditor to any consumer who lacks a Social Security 
account number in any consumer credit transaction in which a security 
interest, including any such interest arising by operation of law, is 
or will be retained or acquired in any property located within the 
United States which is or, upon the completion of the transaction, will 
be used as the principal residence of such consumer.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 2 of the 
Truth in Lending Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
section 139 the following new item:

``140. Mortgages prohibited for principal residences of individuals who 
                            lack Social Security account numbers.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30759]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 6, 2000.

Place:  Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.
Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: November 29, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-30759 Filed 11-30-00; 11:19 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2220 

MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF; ELOUISE A. SIRLEAF,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

F. VERNON BOOZER; EDWARD C. COVAHEY, JR.;

THOMAS P. DORE; ROGER J. SULLIVAN, Attorneys,

Substituted Trustees and Agents, Covahey &

Boozer; DONNA HILD, Legal Assistant and Agent,

Covahey & Boozer; COVAHEY & BOOZER; FIRST

TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; MAINUDDIN JANGI;

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(CA-01-3823-L)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Elouise A. Sirleaf, Appellants Pro Se.

Douglas Windsor Biser, MUDD, HARRISON & BURCH, Towson, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Momolu V. S. Sirleaf and Elouise A. Sirleaf appeal the

district court’s order denying their motion to disqualify the judge

and dismissing their civil action with prejudice for failure to

comply with the court’s order to file an amended complaint. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Finding no abuse of discretion in the

district court’s denial of the motion to disqualify or in the

dismissal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Sirleaf v. Boozer, No. CA-01-3823-L (D. Md. Sept. 5, 2003). We

deny Appellants’ motions to correct the record and to supplement

the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1357 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1357

   To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey the former Navy 
   Extremely Low Frequency communications project site in Republic, 
     Michigan, to Humboldt Township in Marquette County, Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2009

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey the former Navy 
   Extremely Low Frequency communications project site in Republic, 
     Michigan, to Humboldt Township in Marquette County, Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER NAVY EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY 
              COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT SITE, REPUBLIC, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may convey, 
without consideration, to Humboldt Township in Marquette County, 
Michigan, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, in 
Republic, Michigan, consisting of approximately 7 acres and formerly 
used as an Extremely Low Frequency communications project site.
    (b) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 2




UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.

SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN




This AMENDMENT No. 2 (the “Amendment”) dated 31 March 2005 amends the terms and conditions of
the United National Group, Ltd. Share Incentive Plan dated 5 September 2003 (the “Plan”).



WHEREAS, by written resolution of the Directors of United America Indemnity, Ltd., an exempted
company incorporated with limited liability under the law of the Cayman Islands (the “Company”),
dated 15 September 2003, the Plan was unanimously approved by the Directors of the Company; and



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desire to effect the revisions to the Plan set
forth herein effective the date hereof.




NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:




	 	1.	 	The first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as
follows:






“The total number of Common Shares reserved and available for grant under the Plan
shall be 5,000,000 (subject to any increase or decrease pursuant to this Section 3).”




2. The Plan is hereby renamed the “United America Indemnity, Ltd. Share Incentive Plan.”




	 	3.	 	All references to “stock” in the Plan shall be understood to mean “share” or
“shares,” as appropriate.






	 	4.	 	Any reference to the “New York Stock Exchange” shall be struck and replaced with the
“Nasdaq National Market.”






5. The first sentence of Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:



“The Board or the Committee as its duly authorized delegate shall have the authority to grant
Participants Share Options.”
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION ***

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary W. Qualmann,Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, certify, pursuantSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United Sates Code, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|                     | /s/ Gary W. Qualmann                                                                           |   |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Gary W. Qualmann                                                                               |
|                     |                                                                                           |
|                     | Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and  Secretary  (Principal Financial Officer) |
|                     |                                                                                           |
| Date:  May 14, 2004 |                                                                                           |

 

 

----

*This certification is being furnished asrequired by Rule 13a-14(b) under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theExchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Thiscertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except asotherwise stated in such filing.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                         602,779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,370,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (797,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,284,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,114,118
<PP&E>                                      11,970,105
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,638,319)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,484,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,108,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,588
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,865,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,484,097
<SALES>                                     79,109,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,109,063
<CGS>                                       47,705,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,177,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             757,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,551,569
<INCOME-TAX>                                   975,569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,576,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,574,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
Order entered March 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01384-CR

CHARLES EDWARD PHINISEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-70249-H

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11 - Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                                       For the Year Ended
                                                           December 31,        
                                                   1996      1995      1994 
Primary
Average common shares outstanding                 27,847    21,326     20,038

Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
  based on the treasury stock method using
  average market price                             3,714     1,355        518
Total                                             31,561    22,681     20,556

Net income before extraordinary item            $  9,266  $  6,258   $  7,261
Less preferred dividends                             199     1,245         --
Adjusted net income before extraordinary item   $  9,067  $  5,013   $  7,261

Net income                                      $  8,564  $  5,806   $  7,261
Less preferred dividends                             199     1,245         --
Adjusted net income                             $  8,365  $  4,561   $  7,261

Per Share Amounts:
  Net income before extraordinary item             $0.29      $.22       $.35
  Net income                                       $0.27      $.20       $.35

Fully Diluted
Average common shares outstanding                 27,847    21,326     20,038
Net effect of dilutive stock 
  options and warrants based on the 
  treasury stock method using the greater
  of the average market price or the 
  ending market price                              3,914     1,738        546
Convertible securities as if 
  converted at beginning of year                     654       --(1)      --(1)
Total                                             32,415    23,064     20,584

Net income before extraordinary item            $  9,266  $  6,258   $  7,261
Less preferred dividends                              --     1,245         --
Add 7 1/2% convertible notes payable 
  interest, net of Federal income tax effect         152      --(1)     --(1)
Adjusted net income before extraordinary item   $  9,418  $  5,013   $  7,261

Net income                                      $  8,564  $  5,806   $  7,261
Less preferred dividends                              --     1,245         --
Add 7 1/2% convertible notes payable interest, 
  net of Federal income tax effect                   152      --(1)       --(1)
  Adjusted net income                           $  8,716  $  4,561   $  7,261

Per Share Amounts:
  Net income per share before 
  extraordinary item                               $0.29      $.22       $.35
   Net income                                      $0.27      $.20       $.35

(1)  Conversion of the convertible  securities is not assumed in the computation
     because its effect is anti-dilutive.
#### Paul Eddie DUNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 21758.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1941.

Ivan Irwin, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of 12 months.

Appellant has filed a motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

JUNE 30, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED103286 EARL CHANCE PITT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

2. ED103310 IN THE INTEREST OF: C.D.R.

3. ED103388 IN MATTER OF THE CARE & TREATMENT OF KERRY 

BROWN

CORRECTION(S):

1. ED101640 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JASON R. SHELL, APP
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 7, 2014

NO. 03-12-00763-CR

Daniel Whitley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. However, 

there was error in the sentence and cumulation order that requires correction. Therefore, the 

Court modifies the trial court’s sentence and cumulation order to read as follows:

THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONSECUTIVELY AND BEGIN ONLY 

WHEN THE MAY 30, 2008 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF 60 YEARS 

IMPRISONMENT IN THE FOLLOWING CASE CEASES TO OPERATE: 

CAUSE NUMBER D-1-DC-07-301930 IN THE 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY INVOLVING AGGRAVATED SEXUAL 

ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON.

The sentence and cumulation order, as modified, are affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.