alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Colonial Penn Insurance Company, Respondent, v Savan Ennab, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay the arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated December 6, 1989, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is dismissed, and the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, we find that the appellant’s attorney did not act improperly in serving the demand for arbitration upon the petitioner’s Anaheim, California office. The appellant’s policy indicated that it was issued by "Colonial of California”, and all of the appellant’s previous correspondence was sent to the Anaheim office, which had established a file for her claim and arranged for payment of her medical bills *(cf., Matter of Dandy Dan Taxi v Insurance Co.,*155 AD2d 458; *Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v Boisette,*105 AD2d 785). Moreover, the affirmation of the appellant’s attorney, coupled with a United States Postal Service return receipt, established that the demand for arbitration was served upon the petitioner’s Anaheim office by certified mail as required by CPLR 7503, and that the demand was received by the petitioner on August 1, 1986 *(see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Patrylo],*144 AD2d 243; *Matter of Sea Ins. Co. v Hopkins,*91 AD2d 998). Since the petitioner failed to apply for a stay of arbitration within 20 days after receipt of the appellant’s demand therefor, the petition must be dismissed as untimely *(see, Matter of Allcity Ins. Co. [VitucciJ*151 AD2d 430, *affd*74 NY2d 879; *Matter of*
      *495
      *Allstate Ins. Co. [Jones-Barnett],*143 AD2d 570; *Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. [Santiago],*84 AD2d 552). Mangano, P. J., Eiber, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                    8655
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                            16893
<ALLOWANCES>                               243
<INVENTORY>                              54232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         84264
<PP&E>                                  142179
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          330844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    70149
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                    97
<OTHER-SE>                               29501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            330844
<SALES>                                 612576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        612576
<CGS>                                   442996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           144525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       27923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2810)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0


        

</TABLE>
Opinion filed August 30, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-18-00203-CV

___________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R. AND A.R., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 35th District Court

Brown County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV 16-10-384

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, the mother of M.R. and A.R., has filed in this court a motion to

dismiss her appeal. In the motion, Appellant states that she wishes to withdraw her 

notice of appeal, and she requests that this court dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

August 30, 2018 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Willson, J., 

Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

 1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         $70,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $70,000
<PP&E>                                           8,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 $78,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        $1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     $39,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   $78,383
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,364
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    172,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,230
<PP&E>                                         359,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 776,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,046
<BONDS>                                        276,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           297
<OTHER-SE>                                     220,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   776,628
<SALES>                                        424,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               424,912
<CGS>                                          300,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  389,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,195)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,132
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,132
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .76<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTS BASIC EPS
</FN>


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000709 29-JUN-2017 07:58 AM
August 15, 2013

Ms. Judith A. Enck Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency Region II 290 Broadway New York, NY 10007-1866

Dear Administrator Enck:

Re: Wolff-Alport Chemical Company Site Queens, Queens County

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the New York State Department of Health (DOH), collectively referred to as the “State,” have reviewed the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ’s (E PA) request of November 26, 2012 that the State concur with the proposal to list the Wolff-Alport Chemical Company Site on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). We understand that upon listing, the remedial action process would begin

with a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study to fully assess the nature and extent of siterelated contamination.

As you know, o ur technical staffs have held numerous discussions relative to the hazard posed by the radiological materials that were disposed of at this site. We fully support the planned interim remedial action as well as the ongoing field investigation, which should speak to some of

the c oncerns we raised. While the State has identified several areas of concern with the

nomi nation package, we recognize that NPL status will bring a comprehensive site assessment and pe rmanent remedy for this site that otherwise might not be realized, certainly in the near term. Accordingly, DEC, in consultation with DOH , concurs that it is appropriate to nominate the Wolff-Alport site to the NPL.

Please call me at (518) 402-8540 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Joseph J. Martens
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mark A Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    Mark A. Smith   
|                      |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Mark A. Smith          
|                      |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.6


 


MODIFICATION TO
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 


WHEREAS,
on December 23, 1994, Lee Pharmaceuticals (“Maker”) and Henry L. Lee, Jr.
(“Holder”) entered into an agreement (“Note”) whereby Lee Pharmaceuticals was
to pay to Henry L. Lee, Jr. the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars;
and


 


WHEREAS,
on June 30, 1998, the parties thereto modified said Note to extend the
maturity date from June 30, 1998, until January 1, 2005, and the Note
had an option to extend the maturity date for an additional five years beyond January 1,
2005.  All other terms and conditions of
the Note remained the same.


 


WHEREAS,
the parties thereto now desire to further modify said Note and Modification;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties modify said Note and Modification as follows:


 


1.      The maturity
date of the Note is extended from January 1, 2005, until January 1,
2010.


 


2.      All other
terms and conditions of the Note remain the same.


 


 


Dated  this  24th 
day  of  February,  2005


 


 


	
   

  	
  RONALD
  G. LEE

  
	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals

  
	
   

  	
  By: Ronald G. Lee, President

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  HENRY
  L. LEE, JR.

  
	
   

  	
  Henry L. Lee, Jr.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
     I, Charles M. Fleischman, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DigeneCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal-control over financial reporting.
Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ Charles M. Fleischman Name: Charles M. FleischmanTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Order entered October 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01664-CR

LEMUEL MOSLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1157352-I

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s motion to extend time to file its appellate brief. The 

State’s brief received on October 24, 2014 is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 21



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------
                                        

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Value Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-74002, 33-42969
and 33-310695) and on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-85568, 33-89248 and 33-30082) of
our report dated February 19, 1997, except for Note 2, as to which the date is 
April 14, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Value Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 
10-K/A.



Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Hartford, Connecticut
April 17, 1997

                                      95
Exhibit 10.4
------------


       _\|/_
      Prima Oil & Gas Company
                                                    February 21, 2001


Exhibit 10.4
------------






Unioil
Joseph Associates of Greeley, Inc.
P.O. Box 310
Evans, CO  80620



                                                   RE:   Farmout/Farmout Option
                                                         Agreement dated 11/7/96
                                                         Weld County, Colorado


Gentlemen:

       Pursuant to that certain  Farmout/Farmout Option Agreement dated November
7, 1996, ("the  Agreement")  between Unioil,  and Joseph  Associates of Greeley,
Inc.  ("JAGI") and Prima Oil & Gas Company  ("Prima") and the  Amendment  Letter
dated March 24, 1999,  the rights under the Agreement  will  terminate  June 30,
2001. JAGI and Prima hereby agree to extend the  termination  date from June 30,
2001 to December 31, 2001.

       If you are in agreement with the foregoing,  please sign, date and return
one copy of this letter at your earliest convenience.

                                                    Sincerely,

                                                    PRIMA OIL & GAS COMPANY


                                                    /s/ Cindi Danner


                                                    Cindi Danner, CPL
                                                    Landman


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF February, 2001.
                           -----        --------

UNIOIL                                        JOSEPH ASSOCIATES OF GREELEY, INC.

/s/ F. C. Jones                               /s/ F.C. Jones
----------------------------------            ----------------------------------

Printed Name:                                 Printed Name:
             ---------------------                         ---------------------
Title:  VP                                    Title:  VP
      ----------------------------                  ----------------------------










              1099 18th Street o Suite 400 o Denver, Colorado 80202
         Office: 303.297.2300 o Fax: 303.297.7708 o www.primaenergy.com
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 33-43001, 33-49234, 333-27613, 333-31464, 333-31379, 333-61002, 333-95725, and 333-125062 and Form S-3 No. 333-101514) of ESB Financial Corporation of our reports dated March 9, 2009, relating to ouraudit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders of ESB Financial Corporation, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. 

Wexford, PA 

March 12, 2009
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1675 

To promote quality student loan servicing by improving the borrower 

experience for borrowers of Federal Direct Loans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2017 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To promote quality student loan servicing by improving the 

borrower experience for borrowers of Federal Direct Loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Servicer 

5 Performance Accountability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPETITION IN STUDENT LOAN SERVICING. 

7 (a) CANCELLATION OF SOLICITATIONS.—The Sec8 retary of Education shall cancel the Department of Edu9 cation solicitations for the Federal Aid Servicing Solution 

10 dated April 4, 2016 and October 26, 2016, including any 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1675 IS

1 amendments to those solicitations (Solicitation No. ED– 

2 FSA–17–R–0001 et seq). 

3 (b) COMPETITION IN STUDENT LOAN SERVICING.— 

4 Section 456 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

5 U.S.C. 1087f) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(c) COMPETITION IN STUDENT LOAN SERVICING.— 

8 ‘‘(1) COMPETITION.—As of the date of enact9 ment of the Student Loan Servicer Performance Ac10 countability Act, in order to promote accountability 

11 and high-quality services to borrowers, the Secretary 

12 shall not issue any contract solicitation for a new 

13 Federal student loan servicing solution unless such 

14 a solution— 

15 ‘‘(A) provides for the participation of mul16 tiple student loan servicers that contract di17 rectly with the Department of Education; and 

18 ‘‘(B) allocates student loan borrower ac19 counts to eligible student loan servicers based 

20 on performance. 

21 ‘‘(2) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary shall not 

22 award a contract to a single servicer to service all 

23 Federal Direct Loans.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                         
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Date: March 24, 2010 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Thomas R. Oxenreiter
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Thomas R. Oxenreiter    
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer