alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger S., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered April 29, 1988, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that the trial court erred by allowing the complainant, who was five years old at the time of the crime, and eight years old at the time of the trial, to give sworn testimony. We disagree. The trial court’s determination of whether a child is competent to give sworn testimony is entitled to significant deference on appeal *(see, People v Nisoff,*36 NY2d 560, 566; *People v Rosado,*157 AD2d 754, 755). In the present case, the complainant demonstrated that he was able to distinguish between telling the truth, which was a "good thing”, and telling a lie, which was a "bad thing”. Moreover, he understood that a promise to tell the truth meant that he would not lie, and that if he did lie, he would be punished. Thus, the complainant displayed an awareness of "the nature of an oath” (CPL 60.20 [2]), and the trial court properly exercised its discretion in allowing him to give sworn testimony *(see, People v Tyler,*154 AD2d 490). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James W. Morozzi
|Name:                |  | James W. Morozzi       
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | August 9, 2005         



1



---

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Thomas E. Morell
|Name:                |  | Thomas E. Morell       
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                |  | August 9, 2005         



2
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1540

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the $2 charge for outpatient

prescription drugs required to be charged by the Department of Veterans

Affairs in certain cases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1993

Mr. ROGERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the $2

charge for outpatient prescription drugs required to be

charged by the Department of Veterans Affairs in certain

cases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 1722A of title 38, United States Code,

4 is repealed.

5 (b) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter

6 17 of such title is amended by striking out the item relat7 ing to section 1722A.

Æ
#### COBB et al. v. MORSE et al.

No. 3615.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Nov. 9, 1939.

G. C. Lowe, of Woodville, and B. L. Morse, of Galveston, for appellants.

C. E. Smith, of Woodville, and H. D. Grogan, of Liberty, for appellees.

O’QUINN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Tyler County, overruling a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction.

We have carefully examined the whole record, pleadings, evidence and rulings and judgment of the court, and find no reversible error. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.
D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ James W. Morozzi   
|Name:  |  | James W. Morozzi       
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | August 7, 2007         



1



---

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ Thomas E. Morell   
|Name:  |  | Thomas E. Morell       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | August 7, 2007         



2
#### Fulton E. BURKE, Appellant, v. Margaret Lee BURKE, Appellee.

No. 9590.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 9, 1940.

Latham & Watkins, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Wm. M. Rains, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeals in above cause dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
Proposed Carlsbad Energy Center Project , Carlsbad, Ca.

Kerry Siekmann 

t

o

:

Shaheerah Kelly, Shaheerah Kelly 09/22/2009 04:06 PM

From: Kerry Siekmann <siekmann1@att.net>

To: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been replied to.

Dear Ms. Kelly 

The Final Determination of Compliance has been published by the San Diego Air Pollution 

Control District. Due to the San Diego rules there is a glaring omission in the report. Nowhere 

do they measure cumulative air pollution impacts from:

1) The proposed Carlsbad Energy Center Project

2) Encina Power Station - Units 4 & 5 (which will continue to run)

3) The I-5 Interstate (which may soon be widened to up to 12 lanes of traffic.)

4) Railroad trains running through the immediate area.

5) The SDG&E service yard.

All of these polluters are adjacent to each other at the Encina site, and the neighborhood of 

Terramar is directly south of the Encina site.

The first three listed sources of pollution are the major polluters but it is important to add all 

pollution emitters together when looking at cumulative emissions. 

The question is "Who will look at these cumulative effects?"

The San Diego Air Pollution Control District has not!

Please help us to address this important issue.

Sincerely

Kerry Siekmann

5239 El Arbol Dr.

Carlsbad, Ca. 92008

siekmann1@att.net

760-438-5611
Calendar No. 45

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for a continued United States policy of oppopulations. ing the world’s whale, dolphin, and porpoise Congress with respect to conserving and protect- ing, and otherwise expressing the sense of the position to the resumption of commercial whalMARCH 23 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Reported without amendment
III

Calendar No. 45

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Received

MARCH 2 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

MARCH 23 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Reported by Mr. PELL, without amendment

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for a continued United States policy of opposition

to the resumption of commercial whaling, and otherwise

expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to

conserving and protecting the world’s whale, dolphin,

and porpoise populations.

Whereas there is significant widespread support in the international community for the view that for scientific, ecological, and educational reasons, whales should no longer

be hunted for profit;

Whereas there is concern that efforts will be made at the

1993 Annual Meeting of the International Whaling Com-
2

HCON 34 RS

mission to overturn the Commission’s existing moratorium on commercial whaling of large whales;

Whereas there are species of small cetaceans that are currently subject to direct commercial harvest; and

Whereas there are unique regions of the world’s seas which

serve as important feeding grounds for many species of

whales, and where the impacts of environmental threats

are unknown: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States policy should promote the

4 conservation and protection of whale, dolphin, and

5 porpoise populations;

6 (2) the United States should remain opposed to

7 any resumption of commercial whaling, and should

8 work toward a moratorium on the direct commercial

9 harvest of dolphins and porpoises;

10 (3) the United States should work to strength11 en the International Whaling Commission by

12 reaffirming its competence to regulate direct com13 mercial harvest of small cetaceans and should en14 courage the Commission to consider the expertise of

15 its Scientific Committee;

16 (4) the United States should support the estab17 lishment of appropriate international sanctuaries

18 where whaling is prohibited; and
3

HCON 34 RS

1 (5) in promoting the conservation and protec2 tion of the world’s whale populations, the United

3 States should make the fullest use of diplomatic

4 channels, appropriate domestic and international

5 law, and all other available means.

Passed the House of Representatives February 16,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,557,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  884,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,193
<INVENTORY>                                     91,288
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,536,099
<PP&E>                                         950,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                 433,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,654,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          980,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,243,444
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,606,170)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,654,242
<SALES>                                      2,166,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,166,589
<CGS>                                        1,225,093
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,002,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,786,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,786,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,786,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)
        


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Charles M. Fleischman, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Digene
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal-control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2004/s/ Charles M. FleischmanName: Charles M. Fleischman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
October 21, 2015

Mr. Mohammad Tomaleh

Pristine Line Productions

9250 Beloit Avenue Unit 305

Bridgeview, IL 60455

Dear Mr. Tomaleh :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

sections of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We C an n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request posted to the public docket on July 17, 2105, on behalf

of Pristine Line Production filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2989 , but we are unable to

process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of

the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requ ested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
IA 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 8 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing 

the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of desecration of the 

flag of the United States and to set criminal penalties for that act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mrs. EMERSON (for herself and Mr. BACHUS) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of desecration of the flag of the United 

States and to set criminal penalties for that act. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 8 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘The Congress and the States shall have power to 

5 prohibit the act of desecration of the flag of the United 

6 States and to set criminal penalties for that act.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATION ***

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirNetSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Gary W. Qualmann, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer andSecretary, certify, pursuant Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited Sates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|                         | /s/ Gary W. Qualmann                                      |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Gary W. Qualmann                                          |
|                         |                                                      |
|                         | Title: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and  Secretary |
|                         | (Principal Financial Officer)                             |
|                         |                                                      |
|                         |                                                      |
| Date: November 15, 2004 |                                                      |

 

----

*Thiscertification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to theliability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

 

1

----
S. 1766 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To reauthorize the SAFER Act of 2013, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence 

Reporting Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘SAFER Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. PEDIATRIC SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS. 

Section 304(c)(2) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 

2004 (34 U.S.C. 40723(c)(2)) is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘, both adult and pediatric,’’ after ‘‘role 

of forensic nurses’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘and elder abuse’’ and inserting ‘‘elder abuse, 

and, in particular, the need for pediatric sexual assault nurse 

examiners, including such nurse examiners working in the 

multidisciplinary setting, in responding to abuse of both children and adolescents’’. 

SEC. 3. REDUCING THE RAPE KIT BACKLOG. 

(a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 2(c)(4) of the DNA Analysis 

Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701(c)(4)) is amended 

by striking ‘‘2017’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’. 

(b) SUNSET.—Section 1006 of the SAFER Act of 2013 (34 U.S.C. 

40701 note) is amended by striking ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.