alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 61

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2009

Mrs. Maloney (for herself, Ms. Speier, Mr. Boucher, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
 George Miller of California, Mrs. Capps, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Matsui, Mr. 
Meek of Florida, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Loebsack, 
   Mr. Yarmuth, Mr. Tierney, Mr. Inslee, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Farr, Mr. 
  Larsen of Washington, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
   California, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Olver, Ms. Watson, Mr. Sherman, Mr. 
 Kennedy, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Woolsey, Ms. Tsongas, Ms. Eddie 
Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. Richardson, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Crowley, Mr. 
   Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Ms. Herseth Sandlin, Mr. 
Israel, Mr. Sires, Mr. Edwards of Texas, Mr. Clay, Mr. Moore of Kansas, 
    Mr. Waxman, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Engel, Mr. Dingell, Mrs. 
Biggert, Ms. DeGette, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Stark, 
 Mr. Cohen, Mr. Grayson, Mr. Filner, Mr. Cuellar, Ms. Kilroy, and Ms. 
     Loretta Sanchez of California) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the 
date of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Walter SHROPSHIRE v. STATE.

No. 15569.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1933.

Otis Rogers, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is forgery as denounced in article 1006, Penal Code; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The instrument alleged to have been forged was a deed of trust covering lot 3 in block 2 of the Q-Bone addition to the city of Fort Worth. The purpose of the deed of trust was to secure F. W. Skiles in the payment of a note for $400. The date of the transaction was February 23, 1929. The circumstances surrounding the execution of the instruments are the same as those disclosed in the opinion in Walter Shropshire v. State of Texas (Tex. Cr. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 108, this day delivered. An interval of approximately three weeks separated the present transaction from that upon which the prosecution was predicated in Shropshire v. State, supra. The same questions are presented in the two cases.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 45 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 45

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 limiting the number of consecutive terms for Members of the House of 
                    Representatives and the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mr. Solomon introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 limiting the number of consecutive terms for Members of the House of 
                    Representatives and the Senate.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. A person may not serve any portion of a term as a 
Representative if the person has served as a Representative for more 
than one year of each of the six terms that immediately precede the 
term.
    ``Section 2. A person may not serve any portion of a term as a 
Senator if the person has served as a Senator for more than three years 
of each of the two terms that immediately precede the term.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not prevent a person who is serving 
any portion of a term as a Representative or Senator on the date of the 
ratification of this article from serving the remainder of the term.''.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6295

MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00360-RDB)

Submitted: June 25, 2019 Decided: July 1, 2019

Before RICHARDSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Gorbey, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey, a District of Columbia Code offender 

incarcerated at FCI Cumberland in Maryland, seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) habeas petition. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012).∗

 A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When 

the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Owl FeatherGorbey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

 ∗ Because Owl Feather-Gorbey was convicted in a District of Columbia court, he is 

required to obtain a certificate of appealability in order to appeal the denial of his habeas 

petition. See Madley v. United States Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306, 1310 (D.C. Cir. 

2002).
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Joann M. Bailey, Individually and as President of the Atlantic/University Neighborhood Association, Petitioner, v City Planning Commission of the City of Rochester, Respondent. Barrel of Dolls Saloon, Inc., Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: The court erred in denying appellant’s motion to intervene brought pursuant to CPLR 7802 (d) for the purposes of appealing an order granting petitioner’s CPLR article 78 petition. That petition sought to annul respondent’s decision granting appellant’s application for a special use permit. Appellant is an aggrieved party (CPLR 5511), and it was entitled to move to intervene after learning that respondent did not plan to appeal the order *(see, e.g., Auerbach v Bennett,*47 NY2d 619, 628). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.—intervention.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00241-CR

Gerry Don Rudolph

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From The County Court

of Young County (35480)

July 24, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011449
<NAME> SUBURBAN LODGES OF AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          19,015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                      2,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,197
<PP&E>                                         288,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,849
<BONDS>                                         97,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                     216,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,764
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,432
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,951
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,951
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee (SC)-195 meeting to be held December 12-14, 2000, starting at 8:30 a.m. each day. The meeting will be held at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC), Building 1219, Room 128, 1000 NASA Road, Hampton, VA 23681-2199.

                    The agenda will include: December 12: Plenary convenes: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Agenda; (3) Working Group (WG)-1, Aircraft Cockpit Weather Display; Plenary reconvenes: (4) Review of Previous Meeting Minutes; (5) Report from  WG-1 on Activities; December 13: (6) Resolve Industry Comments on Flight Information Service-Broadcast (FIS-B) Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS);                           ( print page 70870)                        December 14: (7) Continue Review and Resolution of Industry Comments on FIS-B Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS); (8) Review Issues and Action Items; (9) Address Future Work; (10) Other Business; (11) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (12) Closing.                

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 16, 2000.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-30257 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
PEOPLEVIEW, INC.

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of PeopleView, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James P. Stapleton, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and
(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.


/s/ James P. Stapleton
---------------------------------------
James P. Stapleton
Principal Financial Officer
May 17, 2004

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to PeopleView, Inc. and will be retained by
PeopleView, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with thisQuarterly Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 7, 2006 |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       | By:    | /s/ DAVID I. MATSON |
|                       |   | David I. Matson |
|                       |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,727,603
<SECURITIES>                                 9,594,557
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,021,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                   168,659
<INVENTORY>                                  2,969,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,204,096
<PP&E>                                       5,796,342
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,138,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,344,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,690,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       145,872
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,508,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,344,277
<SALES>                                      5,090,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,217,696
<CGS>                                        1,676,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,826,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,894
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,064,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,127,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,127,628)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of National Drug Control Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of National Drug Control Policy. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting of White House Task Force on Drug Use in Sport on December 7, 2000 in Salt Lake City, Utah. 

# SUMMARY:

A meeting of the White House Task Force on Drug Use in Sport will be held on Thursday, December 7, 2000 in Salt Lake City, Utah in the Wasatch Ballroom of the Wyndham Hotel, 215 W. South Temple, 2nd Floor, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. The meeting will commence at 8:00 a.m. on December 7th and will conclude at 12:30 p.m. The agenda will focus on two key issues: (1) How can the United States help ensure a drug free 2002 Winter Olympic Games; and (2) How can the United States most effectively reach out to young people to prevent the use of drugs in sport. There will be an opportunity for public comment from 11:10 a.m. until 11:40 on Thursday December 7, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Please direct any questions to Linda V. Priebe, Assistant General Counsel (202) 395-6622, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C. 20503. 

Linda V. Priebe,

Assistant General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 00-30540 Filed 11-27-00; 2:46 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3180-02-P
Exhibit 32.2

US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vicki H. Hitzhusen, Interim Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Vicki H. Hitzhusen                                                         
|Vicki H. Hitzhusen                                                             
|Principal Financial Officer of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc.

May 14, 2008