alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WHEELER v. STATE.

No. 15458.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 15, 1932.

Fox & McNamara, of Waco, for appellant.

Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

■CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is theft by conversion; the-punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The sentence fails to follow the judgment, in that it recites that appellant has been convicted of theft of property over the value-of $50; whereas the judgment, which follows the indictment and charge of the court, shows that appellant has been adjudged guilty of the offense of theft by conversion of property over the value of $50. The .sentence is reformed in order that it may be shown that appellant has been adjudged to be guilty of theft by conversion of property over the value - of $50.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

, PER CURIAM.

(Che foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 32.1 Section 906 Certification




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Eagle International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry C. Turner, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: April 12, 2011
/s/ Terry C. TurnerTerry C. TurnerPrincipal Executive Officer





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,617
<SECURITIES>                                     9,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                       386
<INVENTORY>                                        194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,775
<PP&E>                                           2,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                     811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,862
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,759)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,334
<SALES>                                         27,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,146
<CGS>                                           11,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   236
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  41
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                       406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: October 28, 2005                    By: /s/ William C. Stone
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              William C. Stone
                                              Chief Executive Officer

Date: October 28, 2005                    By: /s/ Patrick J. Pedonti
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Patrick J. Pedonti
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News Tag:
  Feb. 14, 2019 Toward a More Lethal, Flexible, and Resilient Joint Force: Rediscovering the Purpose of JPME II JFSC Faculty, Charles Davis and Frederick R. Kienle published "Toward a More Lethal, Flexible, and Resilient Joint Force: Rediscovering the Purpose of JPME II" in Joint Forces Quarterly. Published JFQ 92, 22 Jan 2019.
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
D&E Communications, Inc.and Subsidiaries 

 

**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 of D&E Communications, Inc.(the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. William Ruhl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:November 9, 2004 

 

1 

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 of D&E Communications, Inc.(the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
  /s/    THOMAS E. MORELL        
Name:
 **Thomas E. Morell**
Title:
 **Chief Financial Officer**
 

Date:November 9, 2004 

 

2
From: Angus Crane [mailto:acrane@naima.org] 

Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 1:06 PM

To: Reeves, David

Cc: Joseph Eisert (jeisert@kirkland.com)

Subject: NAIMA Questions

Importance: High

Dear Mr. Reeves,

As a follow-up to NAIMA’s meeting with EPA, I would like to discuss the following questions with you:

MACT Floor

1. Where in the docket do we find the data and all the calculations that were used to set the MACT Floor?

2. Specifically, were data points from non-phenolic lines used and where can we go to identify all data sources 

used to set the Floor?

3. If companies provide additional data, can it alter the Floor?

4. On single source subcategory, does EPA select the single best test result? Where can this be found in the 

docket? Are there alternatives?

Public Hearing

5. On the Public Hearing, are there time limits?

6. What time will the Public Hearing start?

7. What does EPA anticipate as far as number of participants?

8. How do we find out ahead of time who is presenting?

Calculation of Limits

9. How did you calculate PM limits?

10. How did you calculate HF and HCl limits for fiber glass and mineral wool?

11. Can you send the docket index for mineral wool?

12. How did you calculate MACT Floor formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol limits for both fiber glass and mineral 

wool?

13. How did you calculate COS limits?

14. Where are the analysis for COS, HF, and HCl raw material substitutes?

Sincerely,

Angus E. Crane

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Visit NAIMA online at:

www.NAIMA.org

www.PipeInsulation.org
#### BOLTON v. STATE.

No. 20838.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1940.

*37James F. DeLoney, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for violating the Local Option Law in which a fine of $100 was imposed by the County Court of Nacogdoches County.

The appellant is a negro, and was engaged in running a cafe and dance hall near the town of Garrison. Three officers invaded the premises one night about 8:30 o’clock while a dance was in progress and presumably a number of guests were present. The officers testified that before searching the premises they asked permission of the appellant to do so and that he consented thereto. The search yielded four pints of corn liquor and four pints of wine hidden in and about the premises. Five pints were under a sign board some eighteen or twenty steps from the building in a northwesterly direction, and the rest was in a draw behind the building, but the distance from it is not indicated. The officers also stated that there was a “little whisky in a jug” which was locked up in a back room.

Appellant testified that the room where the jug with some whisky in it was found was rented by the week to a girl who occupied it with another negro girl and that he personally knew nothing of the whisky in the jug. Other jugs were found in the room which the appellant testified were water jugs. There is no evidence that these jugs contained whisky or that they ever had.

We find nothing in the evidence connecting the appellant with the five pints of whisky found “eighteen or twenty steps” northwest of the building. Neither is there any indication that he knew or had any connection with that which was found in the ditch behind the premises. The amount of whisky in the jug found in the house is not indicated. There is no evidence that any sale had been made by the appellant or by any one with his knowledge. On the state of the facts of the case the evidence is wholly insufficient upon which to base a conviction.

The case is reversed and remanded.
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■ ■

● ★

●

●

●

★ ● ● ● ●
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30,
2008 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 24, 2009
*OPINION ISSUED JANUARY 18, 2008*

#### WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS VS. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS

(CC-07-338)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Charles P. Houdyschell Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $294,535.34 for the cost of medical services provided to an inmate at Lakin Correctional Center. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim in this amount and further states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in *Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of*
      *86
      *Mental Health,*8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0109. WPG INTERIORS & EXTERIORS, INC. v. MCBRIDE, LLC et al.

McBride, LLC and Cornell McBride filed suit against WPG Interiors &

Exteriors, Inc. (“WPG”) in magistrate court. The magistrate court found in favor of

the plaintiff, and WPG appealed to state court. At the state court, WPG asserted

counterclaims, and the plaintiffs added a request for OCGA § 13-6-11 attorney fees.

On March 15, 2013, the state court entered a final order awarding attorney fees and

dismissing WPG’s counterclaims with prejudice. WPG appeals this ruling.

Because the order to be appealed disposes of a de novo appeal from a

magistrate court decision, WPG was required to follow discretionary appeal

procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East,

216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Even if the state court decided an issue that

was not raised in the magistrate court, any appeal to this court must comply with

discretionary appeal procedures because the case involves a de novo appeal from a

magistrate court decision. Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 876 (581 SE2d 333)

(2003); Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751, 752 (406 SE2d 225) (1991).

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/18/2014

September 18, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

11:00 a.m., Friday, December 15, 2000.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-30857  Filed 11-30-00; 10:46 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### HUSBAND v. STATE.

No. 20003.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 7, 1938.

Denman & Fowler, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of driving an automobile while intoxicated, and fined $100 and sentenced to serve a term of fifteen days in the county jail.

There are neither bills of exceptions nor statement of facts in the record.

The order of the trial court sentencing the appellant is not in conformity with law, and the same is hereby reformed so as to read as follows: “It is the order of the court that the defendant, Will Husband, who has been adjudged to be guilty of driving and operating an automobile upon the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and whose punishment has been assessed by the verdict of the jury at confinement in the county jail far a term of fifteen days, and a fine of $100, shall be by the sheriff of Nacogdoches County confined in the county jail for a term of fifteen days, and shall pay a fine of $100, together with all costs herein, for all of which let execution issue, and he is remanded to the custody of such sheriff until said sheriff can, obey this direction.”

The remaining portion of such sentence, which relates to the notice of appeal, etc., is not disturbed by us.

All other proceedings appear to be proper and regular, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed. 1