alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 127622 & (39)(40) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 127622 

 COA: 249892 
 Wayne CC: 03-004221-01 

DAYLON LAMOND RANDALL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 26, 

2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are 

not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The 

motions for immediate consideration and for peremptory reversal are DENIED. 

d0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

Section 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of McIntosh Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the
year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William K. Malone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James P. Doyle, Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William K. MaloneWILLIAM K. MALONEChief Executive OfficerMarch 28, 2006/s/ James P. DoyleJAMES P. DOYLEChief Financial Officer and Accounting OfficerMarch 28, 2006


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 1 27 DB 2022 (No. 49 RST 2022)

:

JILL MARIE MOFFITT : Attorney Registration No. 205846

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Montgomery County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3 rd day of November

, 202 2 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinar y Board Member dated October 21 , 2022

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

JILL MARIE MOFFITT

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that s he has

the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in th e

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
Order entered January 24, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-21-01063-CV

IN RE R.B., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-20408-Y

ORDER Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus, and we DENY relator’s motion for temporary relief and

emergency stay as moot. We also STRIKE the petition and supporting appendix

for relator’s failure to comply with ru le 9.9 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
Schedule of Compensation for Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.31 
  
 Schedule of Compensation for Named Executive Officers 
  

									
	 Name

	  	 Job Title

	  	Annual
Base
Salary

	  	Target Bonus%
of Base Salary

	 
	W. Alan McCollough	  	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	975,000	  	100	%
	Philip J. Schoonover	  	President	  	$	700,000	  	80	%
	John W. Froman*	  	Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer	  	$	650,000	  	N/A	 
	Brian E. Levy	  	President & Chief Executive Officer, InterTAN; Chairman, Circuit City Global Sourcing	  	$	552,000	  	66	%
	Michael E. Foss	  	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	  	$	525,000	  	80	%



	*	Mr. Froman resigned as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer effective March 1, 2005. 

  
 For fiscal year 2006, the Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors has established specified earnings
per share levels as the performance goal under the Circuit City Stores, Inc. 2003 Annual Performance-Based Bonus Plan. Bonuses are payable based on the Company’s achievement of the performance goal and may be higher or lower than the target
bonus level.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald P. Miner, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Essex County (Garvey, J.), rendered March 20, 1989, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted rape in the first degree and assault in the third degree.

When this case was originally before us, we withheld decision and remitted the matter to County Court for a hearing and determination of defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on statutory speedy trial grounds (162 AD2d 767). After conducting a hearing, County Court determined that defendant’s statutory speedy trial rights had been violated. Upon reviewing the record now before us, we agree with County Court and find that the People have failed to meet their burden of showing that certain time periods should be excluded *(see, People v Santos,*68 NY2d 859, 861). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

*835Judgment reversed, on the law, and indictment dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                       5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                  0000871014
<NAME>                                  Realty Parking Properties II L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1
<CURRENCY>                                           U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 1
<CASH>                                                    887,200
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             283,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,179,315
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         27,969,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     376,934
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           27,969,119
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        5,334,195
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          516,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        279,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         4,538,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     4,538,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            4,538,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.000
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 24, 2020

a1116

Order 

Clerk

November 24, 2020

160805(48)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160805

COA: 343961

Tuscola CC: 17-014300-FH

LANA LEE KENNEDY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 8, 

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF CLINTRIALS RESEARCH INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,420)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,184
<PP&E>                                          60,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,404
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,931
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,045)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,045)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.39)


</TABLE>
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 54A/21 t

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 54A |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6021 ta' Frar 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 54A

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6021 ta' Frar 2017

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avviżi |
| | PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI |
| | Il-Kunsill |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Estensjoni tal-perijodu ta’ validità tal-listi ta’ riżerva | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

V   Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Kunsill

2017/C 54 A/01

Estensjoni tal-perijodu ta’ validità tal-listi ta’ riżerva

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

V Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Kunsill

| 21.2.2017 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CA 54/1

---

Estensjoni tal-perijodu ta’ validità tal-listi ta’ riżerva

(2017/C 054 A/01)

B’deċiżjoni tas-Segretarju Ġenerali tal-Kunsill tal-Unjoni Ewropea, il-validità tal-listi ta’ riżerva stabbiliti wara l-kompetizzjonijiet miftuħa ta’ hawn taħt, hija estiża sal-31 ta’ Diċembru 2019.

| CONS/AD/430


  (żewġ profili) | organizzata biex tiġi stabbilita lista ta’ riżerva għar-reklutaġġ ta’ amministraturi anzjani fil-qasam tal-politika ewropea fir-rigward tas-sigurtà u d-difiża (PESD). Il-kompetizzjoni tikkonċerna żewġ profili fil-grad AD 9 (profil 1: uffiċjali anzjani tal-ippjanar strateġiku ta’ operazzjonijiet u missjonijiet ta’ ġestjoni ta’ kriżijiet; profil 2: uffiċjali anzjani tal-ippjanar għall-iżvilupp ta’ kapaċitajiet militari/civili/spazjali), li n-notifika tagħha ġiet ippubblikata f’
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 178 A tal-15 ta’ Lulju 2008. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | biex tiġi stabbilita lista ta’ riżerva għar-reklutaġġ ta’ kapijiet ta’ unità fil-grad AD 12 fil-qasam tat-traduzzjoni, bl-Irlandiż bħala l-lingwa prinċipali, li n-notifika tagħha ġiet ippubblikata f’
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 99 A tat-30 ta’ April 2009. |

CONS/AD/430

(żewġ profili)

organizzata biex tiġi stabbilita lista ta’ riżerva għar-reklutaġġ ta’ amministraturi anzjani fil-qasam tal-politika ewropea fir-rigward tas-sigurtà u d-difiża (PESD). Il-kompetizzjoni tikkonċerna żewġ profili fil-grad AD 9 (profil 1: uffiċjali anzjani tal-ippjanar strateġiku ta’ operazzjonijiet u missjonijiet ta’ ġestjoni ta’ kriżijiet; profil 2: uffiċjali anzjani tal-ippjanar għall-iżvilupp ta’ kapaċitajiet militari/civili/spazjali), li n-notifika tagħha ġiet ippubblikata f’
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 178 A tal-15 ta’ Lulju 2008.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

biex tiġi stabbilita lista ta’ riżerva għar-reklutaġġ ta’ kapijiet ta’ unità fil-grad AD 12 fil-qasam tat-traduzzjoni, bl-Irlandiż bħala l-lingwa prinċipali, li n-notifika tagħha ġiet ippubblikata f’
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 99 A tat-30 ta’ April 2009.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1041

ELLA ROANE FORTUNE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KINGS DOMINION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , Senior District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv - 00786

- HEH )

Submitted : April 18 , 2019 Decided: April 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Ella Roane Fortune, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ella Roane Fortune seeks to appeal the district court’s ord er dismissing without prejudice her civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012) ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). Here, the district court concluded that Fortune failed to state a claim because she did not allege that she was terminated from Kings Dominion as a result of unla wful discrimination and did not identify a federal statute or cause of action under which she m ight be entitled to relief. Because these deficiencies may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Fortune seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619,
623

- 24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Acco rdingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Fortune to fi l e an amended complaint. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ James W. Morozzi   
|Name:  |  | James W. Morozzi       
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | August 11, 2008        



1



---

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ Thomas E. Morell   
|Name:  |  | Thomas E. Morell       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | August 11, 2008        



2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems (1205).                    

*Date and Time:*                         January 24 and 25, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 530, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Alison Flatau, Program Director, Dynamic Systems and Control, Sensor Technologies for Civil and Mechanical Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Room 545, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8360.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'01 Dynamic Systems and Control Individual Investigator Award (IIA) Review Panel proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposal being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: December 1, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-31265  Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M