alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 19(b)

[LOGO]
The Chase Manhattan Bank
450 West 33rd Street
New York, NY 10001




 31-Jan-97


To the Holders of:

Fleetwood Credit 1996-B Grantor Trust
$198,288,618.40 6.90% Asset-Backed Certificates, Class A


The following information is being provided to you for the calendar year 1996
pursuant to Section 14.10 of the Standard Terms and Conditions of Agreement
effective September 1, 1996.  Detailed below are the monthly payment factors
(per $1,000 of original issuance) for interest, principal, and fees and
compensation paid to the Servicer.  The information can be utilized for
preparation of federal income tax returns.  Should you have any further
questions regarding the use of this information, please consult your tax
counsel.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Fees and Compensation
                     Interest        Principal           Paid to Servicer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                 <C>             <C>                  <C>
October              5.750000        17.825202             0.833300
November             5.647505        19.392111             0.818500
December             5.536000        15.077462             0.802300
</TABLE>



THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
as Trustee and Paying Agent
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.17.a

                            ASSIGNMENT AND AMENDMENT
                            TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Assignment and Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into
effective as of February 1, 1997 by and among Granite Construction Company
("Granite Co."), Granite Construction Incorporated ("Granite Inc.") and Patrick
M. Costanzo (the "Executive").

      WHEREAS, Granite Co. and the Executive entered into an Employment
Agreement effective as of April 20, 1990 (the "Agreement").

      WHEREAS, subsequent to execution of the Agreement, Executive, along with
other executives of Granite Co., was formally employed by Granite Inc., the
parent of Granite Co.

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to transfer the obligations of Granite Co.
under the Agreement to Granite Inc.

      NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      1.    Assignment. All obligations of Granite Co. under the Agreement are
      hereby assigned to and assumed by Granite Inc.

      2.    Meaning of "Company". All references to "Company" in the Agreement
      as hereby amended, including expressly the references relating to change
      in control in Section 6 of the Agreement, are hereinafter references to
      Granite Inc.

<PAGE>

      3.    No Further Changes. Except as set forth herein the Agreement shall
      remain in full force and effect as originally written.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment and
Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as the day and year first above
written.

GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY                GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED

By: /s/ David H. Watts                      By: /s/ David H. Watts
    --------------------------                  --------------------------------

Title: David H. Watts                       Title: David H. Watts

EXECUTIVE

/s/ Patrick M. Costanzo
------------------------------

Patrick M. Costanzo
------------------------------
      Name (Please Print)
#### BEAUTY SERVICE CORPORATION v. DAVIS.

No. 10302.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 27, 1938.

Moursund, Ball, Moursund & Bergstrom and W. W. Palmer, all of San Antonio, for appellant.

H. L. Dillashaw, of San Antonio," for ap-pellee, ■

MURRAY, Justice.

Neither the appellant nor the appellee has filed briefs herein. However, appellee has filed a motion asking that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed, and that he have *464judgment against the sureties on the super-sedeas bond.

We have examined the record and finding no fundamental error apparent of record appellee’s motion will be granted, the judgment of the trial court affirmed, and judgment here rendered for the full amount of the judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas appeal bond.

Affirmed,' with judgment against sureties.
[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Jones, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-3709.] 

MAHONING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. JONES. 

[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Jones, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 

2019-Ohio-3709.] 

(No. 2010-1462—Submitted September 12, 2019—Decided September 16, 2019.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, James Sidney Jones, Attorney 

Registration No. 0064099, last known address in Boardman, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 25, 2011, 

wherein the court found respondent in contempt of its December 16, 2010 order, 

revoked the stay of his suspension, and suspended him for failing to pay board 

costs, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with 

the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Jones, 127 Ohio 

St.3d 424, 2010-Ohio-6024, 940 N.E.2d 940. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,

and STEWART, JJ., concur. 

________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 24, 2012

h0917 

# Order

September 24, 2012

144812

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144812

COA: 307731

Wayne CC: 99

- 001406

- FC

HARVEY L. FAIRLEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
#### EDDINGS v. STATE.

No. 20373.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 19, 1939.

M. L. Bennett, of Normangee, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant waived a jury and upon a plea of guilty before the court was adjudged to be guilty of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

We observe that in the record before us there appears no sentence, without which there is no final judgment and this court has no jurisdiction of the Case.

The appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1453

GONG-REN YANG, a/k/a Gui Wen Chen, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-281-006) Submitted: November 19, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. H. Raymond Fasano, MADEO & FASANO, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wendtland, Assistant Director, Donald A. Couvillon, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Yang raises no issues regarding the Convention Against Torture claim in this court. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Gong-Ren Yang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. * We have reviewed the administrative record, the immigration judge’s decision, and the order of the Board, and find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Yang failed to sustain his burden of showing past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution, as required to establish eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2004) (stating that the burden of proof ison the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. EliasZacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). We will reverse the Board only if the evidence “‘was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting EliasZacarias , 502 U.S. at 483-84). The evidence does not compel such a result in this case. In addition, we uphold the denial of Yang’s application for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the- 3 - facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). We deny Yang’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 35.6



|     |  |                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Floor 401
South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334
|    
|    

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase
Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National
Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C32 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms
used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I,
Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of
February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Daniel Bober        
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ActiveCore Technologies, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
      of the undersigned herby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
      capacity as an officer of the Company, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: August
              14, 2006
            By: **
            */s/* *Efrem
              Ainsley*Efrem
              AinsleyChief
              Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to ActiveCore Technologies, Inc. formerly
      IVP
      Technology Corporation and will be retained by ActiveCore Technologies, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jorge A. Celaya, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/*                                             | *Jorge A. Celaya* | * * |
|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------|----------|
| **Jorge  A. Celaya**                              | ** **        |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |              |
|                                                   |                   |          |  |  |

 

September 13,2006

----
Courts of Appeals, I certify that the following related appeal or original

proceeding has been previously filed in either the First or Fourteenth Court of

Appeals:

None

Caption:

Trial court

case nurnber:

Appellate court

case number:

of certify nga or pro se pa

lz

IDate]

Note: See Local Rules for the definitions of "underlying case," "related," and

"previously filed."
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digene Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Evan Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to
my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



| | /s/ Evan Jones
Evan Jones
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19601-19602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07807]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9944-63-OA]

Notification of a Cancellation of a Public Teleconference of the 
Science Advisory Board's Economy-Wide Modeling Panel

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19602]]

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA), Science Advisory 
Board (SAB) Staff Office is cancelling the May 19, 2016, teleconference 
of the Economy-Wide Modeling Panel announced earlier (80 FR 77625-
77626).

DATES: The May 19, 2016, teleconference of the SAB Economy-Wide 
Modeling Panel has been cancelled. The July 19-20, 2016, face-to-face 
meeting of the Economy-Wide Modeling Panel previously announced (80 FR 
77625-77626, December 15, 2015) will be held as scheduled.

    Dated: March 29, 2016.
 Thomas H. Brennan,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2016-07807 Filed 4-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### WILSON v. STATE.

No. 21396.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 19, 1941.

Davis & Davis, of Denton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction in the county court of Denton County in which appellant was charged with theft of a pitcher pump and pipe, and assessed a fine of $50.

The transcript in this case consists of sixty pages. The attorney’s brief contains thirty pages, which is unusually well prepared and a thorough discussion of pertinent questions in the case. There are ten pages in the statement of facts. The value of the property is probably five dollars.

From a study of the statement of facts we are unable to determine how many people possess parts in this remarkable assembly of pieces of pipe and pitcher pump which has given rise to this prosecution. One thing is definite and certain, however —the allegation of ownership is in CarsoSullivan and he testifies, after full information on the subj ect, that he is not the owner. Furthermore, there isn’t the slightest evidence of theft in all of the state’s testimony. This is sufficient to dispose of the case.

If occasion demanded, we would be constrained to sustain practically all of the other complaints which appellant presents but it is sufficient to reverse the case on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
IA 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 42 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to parental rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2009 

Mr. HOEKSTRA (for himself, Mr. WOLF, Mr. AKIN, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mrs. 

BACHMANN, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. 

BISHOP of Utah, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

BROUN of Georgia, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. 

BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CAMP, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. 

CARTER, Mr. COLE, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. DEAL

of Georgia, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. FRANKS

of Arizona, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. 

HARPER, Mr. HELLER, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. HERGER, Mr. HUNTER, 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. 

KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. LUCAS, Mrs. 

LUMMIS, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MORAN of 

Kansas, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. 

PRICE of Georgia, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mrs. 

SCHMIDT, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SOUDER, 

Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. TERRY, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. WAMP, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. 

WITTMAN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to parental rights. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 42 IH 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 

10 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

11 ‘‘SECTION 1. The liberty of parents to direct the up12 bringing and education of their children is a fundamental 

13 right. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 2. Neither the United States nor any State 

15 shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that 

16 its governmental interest as applied to the person is of 

17 the highest order and not otherwise served. 

18 ‘‘SECTION 3. No treaty may be adopted nor shall any 

19 source of international law be employed to supersede, mod20 ify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this 

21 article.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75244-75245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, Joint Military Intelligence 
College, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (d) of section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Joint Military 
Intelligence College Board of Visitors has been scheduled as follows:

[[Page 75245]]


DATES: Tuesday, 9 January 2001, 0800 to 1700; and Wednesday, 10 January 
2001, 0800 to 1200.

ADDRESSES: Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington , DC 20340-
5100

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. A Denis Clift, President, DIA 
Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100 (202/
231-3344).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(1), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed. The Board will 
discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the 
Director, DIA, as to the successful accomplishment of the mission 
assigned to the Joint Military Intelligence College.

    Dated: November 27, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-30588 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M