alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

<PAGE>

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2003

The undersigned certify that, to their knowledge, the Form 10-K of Wilmington
Trust Corporation ("Wilmington Trust") for 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Wilmington Trust.

                           /s/ Ted T. Cecala
                           -------------------------------------------------
                           Ted T. Cecala
                           Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

                           /s/ David R. Gibson
                           ----------------------------------------------------
                           David R. Gibson
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Executive Officer)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2005 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated:
November 21, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Joel E. BiggerstaffPrinted Name: Joel E. BiggerstaffTitle: Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1779 

To repeal certain provisions of the Federal Switchblade Act to allow domestic 

manufacturers to ship and sell their products to buyers located in other 

States and to permit the importation of certain knife parts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To repeal certain provisions of the Federal Switchblade Act 

to allow domestic manufacturers to ship and sell their 

products to buyers located in other States and to permit 

the importation of certain knife parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Commerce 

5 Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1779 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS RELATED TO SWITCH2 BLADE KNIVES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to pro4 hibit the introduction, or manufacture for introduction, 

5 into interstate commerce of switchblade knives, and for 

6 other purposes’’ (commonly known as the ‘‘Federal 

7 Switchblade Act’’) is amended by striking sections 1 

8 through 4 (15 U.S.C. 1241 et seq.). 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 83 of 

10 title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

11 (1) in section 1716, by redesignating sub12 sections (h), (j), and (k) as subsections (g), (h), and 

13 (i), respectively; and 

14 (2) in section 1716E(i), by striking ‘‘section 

15 1716(k)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1716(i)’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeals made by this 

17 section— 

18 (1) shall take effect on the date of enactment 

19 of this Act; and 

20 (2) shall not apply with respect to any indict21 ment, convictions, sentencing, appeals, civil or crimi22 nal fines or penalties obtained, forfeitures obtained, 

23 terms of imprisonment, or any other enforcement ac24 tions or proceedings occurring or commenced before 

25 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Broadband      Networks, Inc.                                       | (Tier      1) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| Cellemetry,      LLC                                                | (Tier      1) |
| Cellemetry      Services, LLC                                       | (Tier      1) |
| DCX      Systems, Inc.                                              | (Tier      1) |
| DCX      Systems (Australia) PTY Limited (Incorporated inAustralia) | (Tier      1) |
| Digilog,      Inc.                                                  | (Tier      1) |
| Numerex      Government Services, LLC                               | (Tier      1) |
| Numerex      International Limited                                  | (Tier      1) |
| Numerex      Solutions, LLC                                         | (Tier      1) |
| Orbit      One Communications, LLC                                  | (Tier      1) |
| uBlip,      Inc.                                                    | (Tier      1) |
| Uplink      Security, LLC                                           | (Tier      1) |
|                                                                | (Tier      1) |

----
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO 1. TO LEASE




AGREEMENT made this 10th day of May, 2005, between 100/200 FOXBOROUGH BOULEVARD REALTY TRUST, with
its principal address c/o Foxborough Boulevard Management, Inc., 117 Eastman Street, South Easton,
Massachusetts, 02375, hereinafter referred to as Lessor, and Cyberkinetics, Inc., hereinafter
referred to as Lessee.




WITNESSETH




That the Lease dated May 9, 2003 (the “Original Lease”), covering certain square feet of rentable
floor space at Building Number 100 (Building 100) in the Foxborough Business Center located at 100
Foxborough Boulevard (the original space), Foxborough, Massachusetts, for a term commencing June 1,
2003, and expiring May 31, 2007 between the Lessee and the Trustees of CC&F Foxborough Trust, Whose
interest is now vested in the Lessor herein, is hereby amended as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	TERM:

	 	Effective June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2007.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	PREMISES-
	 	 	 	 
	AREA:

	 	Approximately 7,769 square feet of Rentable Area.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	PROPORTIONATE
	 	 
	SHARE:

	 	11.95%	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	BASE RENT:

	 	June 1, 2005-November 30, 2005: (6,169 sf @ $19 psf) $9,767.58 per month
December 1, 2005–May 31, 2007: (7,769 sf @ $19 psf) $12,300.92 per month

	 
	 	 	 	 
	ELECTRICITY:

	  As the building has one electric meter, the Tenant will pay $1.25 psf for its use of
electricity for lights and plugs. ($809.27 per month)

	 
	 	 	 	 
	LANDLORD’S
	 	 	 	 
	WORK:

	 	In the 1,600 rentable square feet the Landlord will open an entrance, paint and carpet.







Except as heretofore and hereby amended said Lease Agreement dated May 9, 2003 is in all respects
ratified and confirmed.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lessor has signed and sealed this instrument this 12th day of May,
2005, and the Lessee has signed and sealed this instrument on the 10th day of May, 2005.




	 	 	 	 	 
	In the presence of:	 	LANDLORD:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:	 	/s/ Charles E. Harlfinger
	 

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Charles E. Harlfinger, Trustee and not individually
	


	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	In the presence of:	 	TENANT:
	 	 	Cyberkinetics, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:	 	/s/ Timothy R. Surgenor
	 

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Timothy R. Surgenor
	


	 	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-030-00-1020-XU: GPO-0108]


Notice of Meeting of John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Vale District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Meeting of John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council: Pendleton, 
Oregon; March 30 & 31, 2000.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council will 
be held on March 30, 2000 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on March 31, 
2000 from 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the Red Lion (formerly Doubletree) 
Inn, 304 SE Nye Avenue, Pendleton, Oregon. The meeting is open to the 
public. Public comments will be received at 10:00 a.m. on March 31, 
2000. Topics to be discussed by the council will include: John Day 
River Plan update; Social Circle Map; Hells Canyon Subgroup update; 
ICBEMP update; status of roadless area review, range program status 
report for BLM & Forest Service offices; T&E presentation on listing 
process of lynx, wolf and sage grouse; discuss the need for or benefits 
of a future joint meeting of the three Oregon/Washington councils; and 
a 15 minute round table for general issues.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juan Palma, Bureau of Land Management, 
Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918, Telephone 
(541) 473-3144.

Juan Palma,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-3108 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
#### RIVERAS v. STATE.

No. 20118.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

H. Leon Darley, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is sodomy; the punishment,, confinement in the penitentiary for 15 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CS WIRELESS
SYSTEMS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES 3RD QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           83453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      817
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 90055
<PP&E>                                           62724
<DEPRECIATION>                                   19887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  375754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                       85934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     85945
<SALES>                                          20246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 20246
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    43739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (263)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               23952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (42921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4072)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (38849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (38849)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.68)
        

</TABLE>
#### McELREATH v. STATE.

No. 15285.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 26, 1932.

State’s Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1932.

Davenport & Crain, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for receiving and concealing stolen property; punishment, four years in the penitentiary.

We deem it necessary to notice but two propositions involved in this appeal. The record shows that after proving the theft of the alleged stolen car in Dallas, and that same was found in the possession of appellant. 1⁄8 Wichita Falls, and that same was by him and another transferred, the state proceeded to introduce testimony showing the theft by appellant of two other cars from other people than the owner of the alleged stolen car in this case, the two last-mentioned cars being taken from different owners and at different times and places. Objection to this testimony was preserved by proper bill of excep*120tion. There seems little need for discussing the question of its admissibility. This court has many times held it erroneous to pursue such course in a trial. The most recent case is that of McGowan v. State, 117 Tex. Cr. R. 74, 36 S.W.(2d) 156, in which reference is made to many earlier authorities.

There is no claim that the testimony above referred to was introduced by the state in its rebuttal as meeting and overcoming a claim on the part of the appellant of an acquisition of the property in some honest manner. Said testimony was introduced as part of the state’s main case. The principles involved are discussed in the various cases referred to, and we think it unnecessary to here discuss them further.

Over objection the state was permitted to introduce a number of dealers in used cars who testified to.their several methods of investigating the questions of title and ownership when used cars were offered to them by purported owners, especially when such purported owner- was a stranger to the witness. The manifest purpose of this testimony was to reflect upon the character of dealing in similar transactions on the part of appellant. We are of opinion the testimony was improperly admitted. That some dealers under similar circumstances were more cautious, or that they used methods different from those used by the party under investigation or upon trial, would appear incompetent as showing or tending to show the criminality of the accused, as an inference from use .of a different method by him in ascertaining ownership and title to used cars bought by him from persons unknown from the methods of these witnesses.

For the errors discussed, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CORONEL, AKA Juan Coronel 

Garcia, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-73613 

Agency No. A070-056-683 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Juan Coronel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal under the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-73613 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 

1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Delgado 

v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1095, 1108 (9th Cir. 2011). We review de novo claims of due 

process violations in immigration proceedings. Jiang v. Holder, 754 F.3d 733, 738 

(9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of deferral of removal 

under the CAT because Coronel failed to show it is more likely than not he will be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See

8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2); Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940, 948 (9th Cir. 2007).

We reject as unsupported by the record Coronel’s contentions that the

agency did not use the correct legal standard and erred in its analysis. See Lata v. 

INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due 

process claim).

The government’s motion to expedite adjudication and vacate the stay of 

removal is denied. The temporary stay of removal will terminate upon issuance of 

the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### McDONALD, State Com’r of Agriculture, et al. v. AMERICAN FRUIT GROWERS, Inc., et al.

No. 24143.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 26, 1939.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., Dick Stout, Asst. Atty. Gen., McDaniel & Catlett, of McAllen, and Cameron & Hardin, -of Ed-inburg, for plaintiffs in error.

Seabury, Taylor & Wagner, of Brownsville, Strickland, Ewers &' Wilkins and Hill, Greer & Franki, all of Mission, and Luther Hughes, of Weslaco,' for defénd-ants in error.

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error in this case is “Dismissed W. O. J. — Correct Judgment.” We are in accord with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals to the effect that the statutes involved, and referred to by the Court of Civil Appeals, do not authorize the Commissioner of Agriculture to fix minimum prices for citrus fruits. We express no opinion as to the power of the Legislature to confer such authority on the Commissioner. It is not necessary in this case to decide that question.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3030]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting:

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Monday, February 14, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: 1. Personnel actions (appointments, 
promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving 
individual Federal Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: February 4, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-3030 Filed 2-4-00; 4:51 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
Appeal No. 2020AP2115-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2015CF1118

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT III

STATE OF WISCONSIN,

 PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

 V.

JEFFREY KYLE WALKER,

 DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FILED

July 13, 2023

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals

ERRATA SHEET

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District I

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District III

Electronic Notice

Christina Plum, Sarah Motiff

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District II

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District IV

Electronic Notice

Hon. Timothy A. Hinkfuss

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

John VanderLeest

Clerk of Circuit Court

Brown County Courthouse

Electronic Notice

Sonya Bice

Electronic Notice

David L. Lasee

Electronic Notice

Jeffrey Kyle Walker 460158

Oshkosh Correctional Inst.

P.O. Box 3310

Oshkosh, WI 54903-3310

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to paragraph 38

in the above-captioned opinion which was released on May 23, 2023. A corrected 
2

electronic version in its entirety is available on the court's website at 

www.wicourts.gov. 
3