alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1364

To amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 to protect

elected judges against discrimination based on age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of

1967 to protect elected judges against discrimination

based on age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 The last sentence of section 11(f) of the Age Dis5 crimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C.

6 630(f)) is amended in the penultimate sentence by insert7 ing ‘‘or persons elected to a judicial office’’ before the

8 period.
2

•HR 1364 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

2 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub3 section (b), this Act shall take effect 1 year after the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

5 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment

6 made by section 1 shall not apply with respect to conduct

7 occurring before the effective date of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CLINTRIALS RESEARCH INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          38,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,295
<PP&E>                                          42,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           179
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,953
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,454
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,988
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,807
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2

                   FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT, made as of the 1st day of March, 1998, by and
between MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC., a Michigan corporation (the "Company"),
having offices located at 2301 Commonwealth Blvd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105,
and ROBERT R. RYAN, of Brighton, Michigan ("Employee"), for the purpose
of amending that certain Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee
dated as of April 1, 1994, and amended by agreements dated as of March 1, 1995,
as of March 1, 1996, and as of March 1, 1997 (collectively, the "Employment
Agreement").

                                 WITNESSETH:

        WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to extend the Employment
Agreement and to confirm the same herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
convenants contained herein and in the Employment Agreements, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

        A. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to extend
the term of said Agreement through March 31, 2000.

        B. Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Fourth
Amendment as of the day and date first above written.

WITNESS:                                             COMPANY

                                             MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.

/s/ Linda K. Moore                           By:  /s/ Michael E. Korybalski   
---------------------                             --------------------------
                                                  Michael E. Korybalski, CEO

                                                     EMPLOYEE

/s/ Linda K. Moore                           By:  /s/ Robert R. Ryan
---------------------                             --------------------------
                                                  Robert R. Ryan
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1533

To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to require the use of child

safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation

on commercial aircraft.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1993

Mr. LIGHTFOOT (for himself, Mrs. UNSOELD, Mr. DE LUGO, Mr. VENTO, Mr.

JACOBS, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. FROST, Ms.

NORTON, Mr. WYNN, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. FILNER, Mr.

LEACH, Mrs. MEEK, Mr. FISH, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr. LAZIO, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. KAPTUR, and Mr.

HANCOCK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to require the

use of child safety restraint systems approved by the

Secretary of Transportation on commercial aircraft.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS ON COMMERCIAL

4 AIRCRAFT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601 of the Federal Avia6 tion Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. App. 1421) is amended by

7 adding at the end the following new subsection:
2

•HR 1533 IH

1 ‘‘(g) CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS.—Not later than

2 90 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection,

3 the Secretary shall issue regulations requiring the use of

4 child safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary

5 on any aircraft operated by an air carrier in providing

6 interstate air transportation, intrastate transportation, or

7 overseas air transportation. Such regulations shall estab8 lish age or weight limits for children who are to use such

9 systems.’’.

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con11 tents contained in the first section of such Act is amended

12 by inserting at the end of the matter relating to section

13 601 the following new item:

‘‘(g) Child restraint systems.’’.

14 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD.

15 It is the sense of Congress that the United States

16 representative to the International Civil Aviation Organi17 zation should seek an international standard to require

18 that passengers on a civil aviation aircraft be restrained

19 on takeoff and landing and when directed by the captain

20 of such aircraft.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1
Daniel A. Rice                                           U.S. Bank
Vice President
Oregon Corporate Banking
111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 400
Post Office Box 4412
Portland, OR 97204
503-275-5175

April 18, 1997

Mr. Joseph K. O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer
Phoenix Gold International, Inc.
9300 North Decatur
Portland, OR 97203

Dear Joe:

As we discussed this morning,  the Bank has elected to amend certain sections of
the February 4, 1997, Loan Agreement  between Phoenix Gold  International,  Inc.
and  United  States  Bank of Oregon.  The  following  is a recap of the  amended
sections:

SECTION 2.3    LIMIT ON ADVANCES

               Effective May 19, 1997 the advance rate to be applied to Eligible
               Accounts will be reduced from 80 percent to 75 percent.

SECTION 9e     BORROWER'S CERTIFICATES

               Effective  April  21,  1997  Borrower's   Certificates   will  be
               submitted to the Lender on a weekly  rather than daily basis.  In
               the event the Borrower  should become  over-advanced  against the
               limitation on advances,  daily  Borrower's  Certificates  will be
               immediately required.

SECTION 9f     CASH FLOW PROJECTION

               Effective  April 28,  1997 cash  flow  projections  for a rolling
               twelve week period,  actual results to  projection,  and variance
               analysis  will be provided  to the Lender on a  bi-weekly  rather
               than weekly basis.

Should you have any questions please feel free to call me at 275-5175.

Sincerely,

/s/ Daniel A. Rice
------------------

Daniel A. Rice
List of Subsidiaries


Corporation                        State of
                                   Incorporation    Status
-----------                        -------------    ------

New Era Foods Inc.                 Nevada           wholly owned-active
                                                    but no direct business-
                                                    parent company of Premium
                                                    Cigars Wrappers Inc.
                                                    SYBR.Com Inc.


Island Wholesale Grocers Inc.      New York         wholly owned
                                                    inactive


Premium Cigar Wrappers Inc.        New York         active
                                                    majority owned by
                                                    New Era Foods Inc.

Synergy Brands Distribution Inc.   New York         wholly owned
                                                    inactive


PHS Group Inc.                     Pennsylvania     active
                                                    wholly owned by
                                                    New Era Foods Inc.
                                                    d.b.a. Pro Set Distributors


SYBR.Com Inc.                      New Jersey       active
                                                    wholly owned by
                                                    New Era Foods Inc.

Net Cigar.Com Inc.                 New York         inactive
                                                    wholly owned by
                                                    SYBR.Com Inc.

Net Cigar.Com Inc.                 Florida          active
                                                    wholly owned by
                                                    SYBR.Com Inc.

BeautyBuys.com Inc.                New Jersey       active wholly
                                                    owned by
                                                    SYBR.com Inc.

Dealbynet.com Inc.                 New York         active
                                                    wholly owned by
                                                    Supply Chain
                                                    Technologies Inc.

Supply Chain Technologies Inc.     New York         active
                                                    wholly owned
                                                    by SYBR.com Inc.

Gran Reserv Corp.                  Nevada           active
                                                    wholly owned by
                                                    New Era Foods Inc.

                                     EX-21
EXHIBIT 32





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of True Product ID, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  Richard A. Bendis, the Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.















May 15, 2007                          By:   /s/ Richard A. Bendis



Richard A. Bendis

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than December 19, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President), 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                 

*1. Hardin County Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and Eddie K. Whitlow,*                     Savannah, Tennessee; as trustee for Hardin County Bancshares, Inc., Savannah, Tennessee, executor of the Isom G. Hinton Estate, and co-executor of the Hinton Family Partnership; to retain voting shares of Hardin County Bancshares, Inc., Savannah, Tennessee, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of The Hardin County Bank, Savannah, Tennessee.                 

**B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President), 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                 

*1. Stewart Larkin Armstrong,*                     San Antonio, Texas; to acquire additional voting shares of Kleberg and Company Bankers, Inc., Kingsville, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Kleberg First National Bank, Kingsville, Texas.                 

Dated: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 29, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-30833 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

JERRY L. GENT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 95-3006

THE DEPARTMENT FOR RIGHTS OF

VIRGINIANS WITH DISABILITIES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(MISC-95-14)

Submitted: April 9, 1996

Decided: April 22, 1996

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,

Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Jerry L. Gent appeals the district court's order denying his petition

to proceed in forma pauperis. We vacate and remand with instructions.

Leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be freely granted under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (1988). Cruz v. Hauck , 404 U.S. 59 (1971)

(Douglas, J., concurring). The proper procedure is for the district

court to consider only a petitioner's economic status in making the

decision whether to file a pro se complaint in forma pauperis. Boyce

v. Alizaduh, 595 F.2d 948, 950-51 (4th Cir. 1979). Once filed, the

complaint may be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), if the

complaint is patently frivolous or malicious.

Here, the district court made no explicit findings with regard to

whether Gent satisfied the poverty requirement to proceed in forma

pauperis and denied the petition based upon consideration of the merits of Gent's complaint. Upon review, however, Gent's declaration in

support of his petition to proceed in forma pauperis would support a

finding of indigency because it disclosed that he was not employed,

received only $552 per month from Social Security Disability Insurance, and owned no cash, stocks, or bonds. We are not able to review

the court's determination that the complaint was frivolous based on

the current record because the district court did not file Gent's complaint. Therefore, we find that the district court abused its discretion.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal and vacate the district court's order. Upon remand, the district

court should grant Gent's petition to proceed in forma pauperis and

file the complaint. Once the district court has docketed the complaint,

it has broad discretion to dismiss it for frivolity under § 1915(d).

Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___,

63 U.S.L.W. 3690 (U.S. Mar. 20, 1995) (No. 94-7733). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

 2
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 
Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Termination of Panel Review

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Consent Motion to Terminate the Panel Review of the 
final antidumping duty administrative review made by the International 
Trade Administration, respecting Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From 
Canada (Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-99-1904-02).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Notice of Consent Motion to Terminate the 
Panel Review by the complainants, the panel review is terminated as of 
November 20, 2000. A panel has been appointed to this panel review. 
Pursuant to Rule 71(2) of the Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 
Binational Panel Review, this panel review is terminated and the 
panelists are discharged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States 
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
Washington, D.C. 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade 
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic 
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and 
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with 
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel 
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national 
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine 
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of 
the country that made the determination.
    Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on 
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were 
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). 
The panel review in this matter was requested and terminated pursuant 
to these Rules.

    Dated: November 21, 2000.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 00-30919 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
#### Town of German Flats et al., Appellants, v Aetna Casualty and Surety Company et al., Defendants, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hospital Corporation of America et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with Supreme Court that defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company is entitled to summary judgment. Because it has been alleged, however, that some of the property located at the scene of the loss was owned by Mohawk Valley Nursing Home, we grant plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint, within 30 days of the date of the order to be entered herein, to plead a cause of action to recover for the loss of that property. In so doing, we do not pass upon the merits of such a claim. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Bergin, J.—summary judgment.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Balio and Lawton, JJ.