6630 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to The Clean Air Act

In accordance with 28 CFR 50.7, 38

FR 19029, notice is hereby given that on

January 25, 2000, a proposed consent

decree with respect to defendants Harry

Grant and Sandalwood Construction

Company in United States v. Anthony

Dell’Aquila Enterprises and

Subsidiaries, Harry Grant, and

Sandalwood Construction Company,

Civil Action No. 88–3232 (JCL), was

lodged with the United States District

Court for the District of New Jersey. The

United States’ complaint sought

injunctive relief and civil penalties

under the Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’)

against Anthony Dell’Aquila Enterprises

and Subsidiaries (‘‘Dell’Aquila’’), Harry

Grant, and Sandalwood Construction

Company in regard to violations of the

National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants for asbestos

(‘‘asbestos NESHAP’’) at a facility that

was owned by Dell’Aquila in Hoboken,

New Jersey (‘‘Dell’Aquila site’’). The

consent decree is signed on behalf of

Harry Grant and Sandalwood

Construction Company. The claim

against Dell’Aquila was settled through

a previous consent decree entered in the

United States District Court for the

District of New Jersey.

The consent decree provides that the

defendants Harry Grant and

Sandalwood Construction Company

shall pay a civil penalty of $60,000. The

consent decree also provides, inter alia,

that each of the defendants shall

conduct all demolition or renovation

operations that either of them may

become involved with in the future in

compliance with the asbestos NESHAP.

In connection with any such demolition

or renovation operations, the defendants

are required to engage an accredited

building inspector and obtain a

thorough asbestos identification survey

prior to demolition or renovation to

determine the presence of asbestos

containing materials and to provide EPA

with a copy of each survey at least

twenty days prior to the commencement

of any demolition or renovation.

The Department of Justice will receive

comments relating to the proposed

consent decree for a period of thirty (30)

days from the date of this publication.

Comments should be addressed to the

Assistant Attorney General,

Environment and Natural Resources

Division, Department of Justice,

Washington, DC 20530, and should refer

to United States v. Anthony Dell’Aquila

Enterprises and Subsidiaries, Harry

Grant, and Sandalwood Construction

Co., D.J. Ref. 90–5–2–1–1288.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the office of the United

States Attorney, 970 Broad St., Room

502, Newark, NJ 07102 and at the

Region II office of the Environmental

Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New

York, New York 10007. A copy of the

proposed consent decree may also be

obtained by mail from the Department

of Justice Consent Decree Library, PO

Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In

requesting a copy, please enclose a

check (there is a 25 cent per page

reproduction cost) in the amount of

$4.25 payable to the ‘‘Consent Decree

Library.’’

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,

Environment & Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00–3113 Filed 2–9–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Consent Judgments

Pursuant to The Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation and Liability Act

In accordance with Departmental

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, 38 FR 19029, and

42 U.S.C. 9622(d), notice is hereby given

that a proposed Consent Decree in

United States v. Cornell University, Civ.

No. 00–CV–0121 (NAM), DOJ # 90–11–

2–2/3, was lodged in the United States

District Court for the Northern District

of New York on January 21, 2000. The

Consent Decree resolves the liability of

defendant under section 107(a) of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation and Liability

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a),

relating to the Pollution Abatement

Services Superfund Site in Oswego,

New York (the ‘‘Site’’).

Under the proposed consent decree,

Cornell will cash out its liability for the

Site, subjects to reopeners, by paying to

the United States the sum of $30,000 in

partial reimbursement of EPA’s past

response costs and paying $335,500

toward future operable unit 3 (‘‘OU3’’)

Site costs to the responsible parties who

are performing OU3 under an earlier

consent decree. In exchange for the

work and payment of response costs,

Defendants will receive a covenant not

to sue for response actions at the Site

subject to certain reservations of rights.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

written comments relating to the

proposed Consent Decree. Comments

should be addressed to the Assistant

Attorney General for the Environment

and Natural Resources Division,

Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

20530, and should refer to United States

v. Cornell University, Civ. No. 00–CV–

0121 (NAM), DOJ # 90–11–2–2/3.

The proposed Consent Decree may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney, Northern District of

New York, James Foley U.S.

Courthouse, 445 Broadway, Room 231,

Albany, New York 12207; and at the

Region II Office of the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 290

Broadway, New York, New York 10278.

Copies of the Consent Decree may be

obtained by mail from the consent

Decree Library, United States

Department of Justice, PO Box 7611 Ben

Franklin Station, Washington, DC

20044, (202) 514–1547. In requesting a

copy, please enclose a check in the

amount of $5.25 (25 cents per page

reproduction costs) payable to the

Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Environmental Enforcement Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00–3114 Filed 2–9–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Of Lodging of Settlement

Agreement

Notice is hereby given that on January

18, 2000, a proposed settlement

agreement (‘‘Settlement Agreement’’) in

In re Raymark Industries, Inc., Case No.

98–51540, was lodged with the United

States Bankruptcy Court for the District

of Connecticut. This proposed

Settlement Agreement resolves certain

claims among the United States, the

Trustee of Raymark Industries, Inc., and

Leach Family Holdings, Inc. (‘‘Leach’’)

with respect to a Site known as the

Raymark Industries, Inc. Supefund Site

located in Stratford, Connecticut.

The Settlement Agreement provides

for a payment, under the conditions

specified in the Agreement, to Leach in

the amount of up to $ 1.5 million from

the proceeds of the sale of the portion

of the Raymark Site owned by Raymark

Industries, Inc.

The proposed Settlement Agreement

may be examined at the office of the

United States Attorney for the District of

Connecticut, 915 Lafayette Blvd., Room

309, Bridgeport, Ct. 06604; and at the

Region I office of the Environmental

Protection Agency, 1 Congress St.,

Boston, Mass. 02114–2023. A copy of

the proposed Settlement Agreement

may also be obtained by mail from the

Consent Decree Library, PO Box 7611,

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2000 / Notices 6631

Washington, DC 20044. When

requesting a copy please refer to the

referenced case and enclose a check

made payable to the Consent Decree

Library in the amount of $3.50 (25 cents

per page reproduction costs).

Joel M. Gross,

Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 00–3112 Filed 2–9–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National

Cooperative Research and Production

Act of 1993—Digital Imaging Group,

Inc.

Notice is hereby given that, on August

19, 1999, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the

National Cooperative Research and

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Digital Imaging

Group, Inc. has filed written

notifications simultaneously with the

Attorney General and the Federal Trade

Commission disclosing changes in its

membership status. The notifications

were filed for the purpose of extending

the Act’s provisions limiting the

recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual

damages under specified circumstances.

Specifically, Photoloft.com, Campbell,

CA; PhotoHighway.com, Monterey, CA;

ACD Systems, Victoria, BC, CANADA;

Lightsurf Technologies, Inc., Scotts

Valley, CA; Seattle Film Works, Seattle,

WA; Digitella Technology, Inc., Irvine,

CA; Signafy, Inc., Princeton, NJ;

Intellectual Protocols, Nannet, NY; RCO,

Los Angeles, CA; MediaSec

Technologies, Essen, GERMANY; and

CNS Development, Colleyville, TX have

been added as parties to this venture.

Also, PictureVision, Inc., Herndon, VA;

AccuSoft, Westborough, MA; Digital

Zone International A/S, Aarhus C,

DENMARK; and Samsung Electronics

Co. Ltd., Suwon, Kyungki-D, SOUTH

KOREA have been dropped as parties to

this venture.

No other changes have been made in

either the membership or planned

activity of the joint venture.

Membership in this joint venture

remains open, and Digital Imaging

Group, Inc. intends to file additional

written notification disclosing all

changes in membership.

On September 25, 1997, Digital

Imaging Group, Inc. filed its original

notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of

the Act. The Department of Justice

published a notice in the Federal

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the

Act on November 10, 1997 (62 FR

60530).

The last notification was filed with

the Department on June 10 1999. A

notice has not yet been published in the

Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00–3122 Filed 2–9–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National

Cooperative Research and Production

Act of 1993—OBI Consortium, Inc.

Notice is hereby given that, on August

23, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the

National Cooperative Research and

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), OBI Consortium, Inc.

has filed written notifications

simultaneously with the Attorney

General and the Federal Trade

Commission disclosing changes in its

membership status. The notifications

were filed for the purpose of extending

the Act’s provisions limiting the

recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual

damages under specified circumstances.

Specifically, American Management

Systems, Fairfax, VA; GEIS (GE

Information Systems), Gaithersburg,

MD; and Trilogy Buying Chain, Austin,

TX have been added as parties to this

venture. Also, Texas Instruments,

Dallas, TX; and Open Market,

Burlington, MA have been dropped as

parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in

either the membership or planned

activity of the group research project.

Membership in this group research

project remains open, and OBI

Consortium, Inc. intends to file

additional written notification

disclosing all changes in membership.

On Saturday 10, 1997, OBI

Consortium, Inc. filed its original

notification pursuant to section 6(a) of

the Act. The Department of Justice

published a notice in the Federal

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the

Act on November 10, 1997 (62 FR

60531).

The last notification was filed with

the Department on May 27, 1999. A

notice has not yet been published in the

Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00–3121 Filed 2–9–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National

Cooperative Research and Production

Act of 1993—Ohio Aerospace Institute

Federated Intelligent Product

Environment Consortium (‘‘FIPER’’)

Notice is hereby given that, on July

17, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the

National Cooperative Research and

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Ohio Aerospace

Institute Federated Intelligent Product

Environment Consortium (‘‘FIPER’’) has

filed written notifications

simultaneously with the Attorney

General and the Federal Trade

Commission disclosing (1) the identities

of the parties and (2) the nature and

objectives of the venture. The

notifications were filed for the purpose

of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting

the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to

actual damages under specified

circumstances. Pursuant to section 6(b)

of the Act, the identities of the parties

are Ohio Aerospace Institute, Cleveland,

OH; BFGoodrich Aerospace,

Aerostructures Group, Chula Vista, CA;

Engineous Software, Inc., Morrisville,

NC; GE Aircraft Engines, Cincinnati,

OH; Ohio University, Athens, OH; and

Parker Hannifin Corporation, Mentor,

OH. The nature and objectives of the

venture are to conduct research and

development directed at reducing

design time by intelligently automating

elements of the design process in a

linked associative environment. The

participants are joining together to

collaborate to accelerate the

development of technology to provide

true concurrency between design and

manufacturing. Information regarding

participation in The Federated

Intelligent Product Environment

‘‘FIPER’’ Consortium may be obtained

from Jake Breland, Ohio Aerospace

Institute (OAI), 22800 Cedar Point Rd.,

Cleveland, Ohio 44142.

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00–3127 Filed 2–9–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M