alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1165

To provide that the 10-percent additional tax on early distributions from

qualified retirement plans shall not apply to distributions from certain plans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. COYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide that the 10-percent additional tax on early distributions from qualified retirement plans shall not apply

to distributions from certain plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 10-PERCENT ADDITIONAL TAX ON EARLY DIS4 TRIBUTIONS FROM QUALIFIED RETIREMENT

5 PLANS NOT TO APPLY TO CERTAIN PLANS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 72(t) of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall not apply to any

8 distribution from a defined contribution plan which was

9 the subject of a multiemployer collective bargaining agree10 ment which was originally effective on December 1, 1967,
2

•HR 1165 IH

1 and with respect to which favorable determination letters

2 were issued by the Internal Revenue Service on August

3 21, 1986, and February 19, 1980.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to

5 taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3486 ] 

# Department:

United States Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Correggio and Parmigianino: Master Draftsmen of the Renaissance,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York from on or about February 5, 2001 to on or about May 6, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-5997). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: November 22, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State.

[FR Doc. 00-30557 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. 

Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant: Global Cargo Corp., 8470 N.W. 30th Terrace, Miami, FL 33122, Officers: Pedro Altove, Vice President (Qualifying Individual), Homero Hauque, President.

Dated: December 1, 2000.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-31072 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### The LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF ASHE, in the State of North Carolina, and J. F. Scott, Chairman, R. B. Brown and J. E. Oliver, Members of the Board of Commissioners of Ashe County, Appellees.

No. 4603.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

March 22, 1940.

C. L. Shuping and G. C. Hampton, Jr., both of Greensboro, N. G, for appellant.

W. B. Austin and Ira T. Johnston, both of Jefferson, N. G, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Case entered dismissed under Rule 23 in accordance with agreement of counsel.
#### LIMON v. STATE.

No. 20072.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

E. P. Lipscomb, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was charged with employing a child under fifteen years of age to labor in a factory engaged in shelling pecans. Upon conviction punishment was assessed at a fine of twenty-five dollars. Prosecution was under Acts of the 41st Legislature, Ch., 180, p. 391; carried forward in Vol. 3, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. as Arts. 1573-1578a.

The only semblance of a statement of facts brought forward is a statement “that the undisputed evidence showed that the child the defendant employed was his own daughter.” .There is not one word of testimony showing that the child was under fifteen years of age, or the character of work she.was supposed to perform which excluded her from the exceptions alleged in. the State’s pleadings, one of which was that the county judge had not granted a permit for such employment.

The purpose of the appeal was apparently an effort to get an opinion from this court on appellant’s contention that the law involved did not reach a parent who employed his own child. We commend the brevity of the record brought up, but it is so extremely brief that no facts are shown supporting the conviction under any circumstances. . ’

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### SCHNITZER v. RICHARDSON. District Clerk, et al.

Motion No. 13998.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Aug. 15, 1940.

Samuel Peterson and Bonham & Weller, all of San Antonio, for appellant.

Neel & King, of Corpus Christi, for appel-lees.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

In the matter in hand, it appears that the district judge heard evidence on relator’s duly contested application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, but in denying such application granted relator leave to appeal upon condition that he deposit cash for costs in the sum of $500, or file in lieu thereof his appeal bond for costs in the sum of $1,000. Relator now asks leave to file his petition for “judgment setting aside said order” of the court below, and for mandamus requiring the clerk of the trial court to furnish relator with a free transcript of the record, and the court reporter to furnish a free statement of facts for use in this appeal, under the provision of Art. 2266, as amended, and Art. 2278a of Vernon’s Civil Statutes.

This being an original proceeding here, this Court has no jurisdiction to either affirm, set aside or reverse the order of the trial judge requiring relator to deposit a sum in cash or furnish an appeal bond for a stipulated sum; such jurisdiction to review and revise is purely appellate, which cannot be invoked in this original proceeding.

 On the other hand, the question of relator’s inability to pay or secure all or a part of the costs of appeal is primarily one of fact to be determined by the trial, judge from evidence adduced upon the hearing of a contested affidavit of inability. On the hearing in this instance relator testified' at length upon that issue. If full favorable effect be given, his testimony and all deducible inferences therefrom, he would be entitled to the right of appeal under the statute. But it is obvious that the trial judge did not give full credence to all relator’s testimony, but, on the contrary, found as a fact therefrom that relator was able to pay or secure at least a part of the costs of appeal. Looking at the record as presented, we cannot say, as a matter of law, that the trial judge (presumably acquainted with the *959parties and their situations, and seeing and hearing the witnesses testify upon the issue) abused his discretion in holding that the evidence showed relator is able to pay or secure a part of the costs of appeal. This being so, this Court is without authority to require the officers of the trial court to furnish a free record to relator to enable him to prosecute an appeal in the case.

Under the case thus made relator’s previously tendered and rejected petition for mandamus did not show probable cause for that relief, and his motion for rehearing upon his previously denied motion for leave to file said petition must be overruled.
#### CROCKER v. STATE.

No. 19770.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1938.

J. R. Bogard, of San Augustine, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1703 

To amend section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 

allow certain alien veterans to be paroled into the United States to 

receive health care furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2017 

Ms. DUCKWORTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow certain alien veterans to be paroled 

into the United States to receive health care furnished 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthcare Opportuni5 ties for Patriots in Exile Act’’ or the ‘‘HOPE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAROLE FOR CERTAIN VETERANS. 

7 Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1703 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or (C)’’ 

2 after ‘‘(B)’’; 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘Attorney General’’ each place 

4 such term appears and inserting ‘‘Secretary of 

5 Homeland Security’’; and 

6 (3) by adding the following: 

7 ‘‘(C)(i) The Secretary of Homeland Security may pa8 role any alien qualified under clause (ii) into the United 

9 States— 

10 ‘‘(I) at the discretion of the Secretary; 

11 ‘‘(II) on a case-by-case basis; and 

12 ‘‘(III) temporarily under such conditions as the 

13 Secretary may prescribe. 

14 ‘‘(ii) To qualify for parole under clause (i) an alien 

15 applying for admission to the United States shall— 

16 ‘‘(I) be a veteran (as defined in section 101(2) 

17 of title 38, United States Code); 

18 ‘‘(II) seek parole to receive health care fur19 nished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under 

20 chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code; and 

21 ‘‘(III) be outside of the United States pursuant 

22 to having been ordered removed or voluntarily de23 parted from the United States under section 240B. 

24 ‘‘(iii) Parole of an alien under clause (i) shall not be 

25 regarded as an admission of the alien. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1703 IS

1 ‘‘(iv) If the Secretary of Homeland Security deter2 mines that the purposes of such parole have been served, 

3 the alien shall forthwith return or be returned to the cus4 tody from which the alien was paroled. 

5 ‘‘(v) Parole shall not be available under clause (i) for 

6 an alien who is inadmissible due to a criminal conviction— 

7 ‘‘(I)(aa) for a crime of violence (as defined in 

8 section 16 of title 18, United States Code), exclud9 ing a purely political offense; or 

10 ‘‘(bb) for a crime that endangers the national 

11 security of the United States; and 

12 ‘‘(II) for which the alien has served a term of 

13 imprisonment of at least 5 years.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
# AGENCY:

National Park Service 

# ACTION:

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee; Notice of Nomination Solicitation 

**SUMMARY:**                     The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee [P.L. 101-601] became law on November 16, 1990. Section 8 of the Act establishes a review committee to monitor implementation of the statute, facilitate the resolution of disputes, consult with the Secretary of the Interior in the development of regulations, and report to Congress on the status of implementation. The National Park Service is soliciting nominations for two members on this review committee.                 

# DATES:

Nominations should be received by June 19, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Nominations should be sent to the Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnerships, 1849 C Street NW- 350 NC, Washington, DC 20240. Nominations should include a brief biography with home and business addresses and telephone number of each nominated individual. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. John Robbins, Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnerships, 1849 C Street NW- 350 NC, Washington, DC 20240; telephone 202/343-3387. A copy of the charter for this review committee is available upon request. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 8 (b) of the Act stipulates that the review committee is composed of seven members appointed by the Secretary of the Interior as follows: 

a. Three members appointed from nominations by Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, and traditional religious leaders, with at least two such persons being traditional religious leaders. The term traditional religious leader means: 

1. a person who is recognized by members of an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization as being responsible for performing cultural duties relating to the ceremonial or religious traditions of that Indian tribe; or 

2. a person who has or is exercising a leadership role in an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization based on the tribe's or organization's cultural, ceremonial, or religious practices. 

b. Three members appointed from nominations submitted by national museum organizations and scientific organizations; and 

c. One member appointed from a list of persons developed and consented to by all of the other members. 

The Secretary of the Interior will appoint one member from nominations received from Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations. This particular appointee is not required to be a traditional religious leader. 

The Secretary of the Interior will appoint one member from nominations received from national museum organizations and scientific organizations. The Secretary of the Interior may not appoint Federal officers or employees to the review committee. 

Dated: February 2, 2000, 

John Robbins, 

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnerships. 

[FR Doc. 00-3052 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-F
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-113-000]


Algonquin Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

December 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 22, 2000, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 707 and First 
Revised Sheet No. 708, to be effective on January 1, 2001.
    Algonquin states that the purpose of this filing is to revise the 
phone number of the person to whom complaints should be directed 
regarding Algonquin's compliance with the Commission's gas marketing 
affiliate rules and to provide for the posting on Algonquin's Internet 
Web site of information regarding shared operating employees and shared 
facilities, as well as any physical office space barriers and card key 
protections that may be necessitated by virtue of shared office space, 
consistent with Commission precedent.
    Algonquin states that copies of its filing has been mailed to all 
affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31130 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134170 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134170 COA: 267113 Wayne CC: 05-006457-01 GARY VERNARD PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75941-75942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30831]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 00N-1311]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Export of Medical Devices--Foreign Letters of Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Export of Medical Devices--Foreign 
Letters of Approval'' has been approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 12, 
2000 (65 FR 55027), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the

[[Page 75942]]

information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0264. 
The approval expires on November 30, 2003. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: November 28, 2000.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30831 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F