alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Forms S-8 No. 33-40546, No. 33-45416, No. 33-73014, No. 33-73016, No. 
333-660, No. 333-10631 and No. 333-10633 and Form S-3 No. 333-23385) of Symix 
Systems, Inc. dated June 25, 1991, January 30, 1992, December 16, 1993, 
December 16, 1993, January 29, 1996, August 22, 1996, August 22, 1996 and 
March 26, 1997, respectively, of our report dated July 25, 1997, with respect 
to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule 
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Symix Systems, Inc.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
-------------------------
Ernst & Young LLP

Columbus, Ohio
September 26, 1997
PROMEDCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
EXHIBIT 11
Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                                               June 30,                       June 30,
                                                     -----------------------------  -------------------------------
                                                          1998           1997           1998            1997
                                                     -------------   -------------  -------------  ----------------
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC
     Weighted average shares outstanding                17,322,667      10,050,953     15,068,166         8,459,921
     Contingently issuable shares in business
         combinations                                      518,454       1,980,773        715,507         1,980,230
                                                     -------------   -------------  -------------  ----------------
     Number of common shares outstanding                17,841,121      12,031,726     15,783,673        10,440,151
                                                     =============   =============  =============  ================

DILUTED
     Weighted average shares outstanding                17,322,667      10,050,953     15,068,166         8,459,921
     Contingently issuable shares in business
         combinations                                      518,454       1,980,773        715,507         1,980,230
     Net common shares issuable on exercise of
         certain stock options and warrants (1)          2,713,668       2,672,695      2,727,004         2,693,749
     Other dilutive securities                              -               -              -                 -
                                                     -------------   -------------  -------------  ----------------
     Number of common shares outstanding                20,554,789      14,704,421     18,510,677        13,133,900
                                                     =============   =============  =============  ================
</TABLE>






(1)  Net common  shares  issuable  on  exercise  of certain  stock  options  and
     warrants is calculated based on the treasury stock method
II 

Calendar No. 408 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1867 

[Report No. 115–244] 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate the sunset of certain 

provisions relating to information technology, to amend the Carl Levin 

and Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2015 to extend the sunset relating to the Federal Data 

Center Consolidation Initiative, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. UDALL, Mr. WARNER, and Mrs. 

MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

MAY 10, 2018 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate the 

sunset of certain provisions relating to information technology, to amend the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ 

McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2015 to extend the sunset relating to the Federal 

Data Center Consolidation Initiative, and for other purposes. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1867 RS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FITARA Enhance5 ment Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET RELATING TO TRANS7 PARENCY AND RISK MANAGEMENT OF 

8 MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVEST9 MENTS. 

10 Subsection (c) of section 11302 of title 40, United 

11 States Code, is amended by striking the first paragraph 

12 (5). 

13 SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET RELATING TO INFORMA14 TION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO, PROGRAM, 

15 AND RESOURCE REVIEWS. 

16 Section 11319 of title 40, United States Code, is 

17 amended— 

18 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (c) 

19 as subsection (d); and 

20 (2) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by 

21 striking paragraph (6). 

22 SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF SUNSET RELATING TO FEDERAL 

23 DATA CENTER CONSOLIDATION INITIATIVE. 

24 Subsection (e) of section 834 of the Carl Levin and 

25 Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon National Defense AuthorizaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:46 May 11, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1867.RS S1867

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1867 RS

1 tion Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 44 

2 U.S.C. 3601 note) is amended by striking ‘‘2018’’ and in3 serting ‘‘2020’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 408 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1867 

[Report No. 115–244] 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to eliminate 

Consolidation Initiative, and for other purposes. the sunset relating to the Federal Data Center Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 to extend Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon National Defense mation technology, to amend the Carl Levin and the sunset of certain provisions relating to inforMAY 10, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 26, 1996 FOR FINE HOST
CORPPORATION, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011584
<NAME> FINE HOST CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1996
<CASH>                                             962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,341
<PP&E>                                          20,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,567
<SALES>                                         51,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,266
<CGS>                                           46,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (936)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,535)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.60)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

Stockholders and Board of Directors ofAllied Devices CorporationHicksville, New York

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference and inclusion in the Prospectuses constituting part of theRegistration Statements filed on Form S-8 on April 6, 1994 (No. 33-77428),April 8, 1996 (No. 333-03394) and May 18, 2001 (No. 333-61208) of our reportdated January 3, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements ofAllied Devices Corporation and subsidiaries appearing in the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002.  Our report contains an explanatory paragraphregarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

 

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Melville, New York

 

January 13, 2003

 

----
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4682

_____________________________
J EROME H AYES , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. August 14, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , B.L. T HOMAS , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jerome Hayes, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By notice dated June 26, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on July 14, 2000, (65 FR 43785), American Radiolabeled 
Chemical, Inc., 11624 Bowling Green Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63146, 
made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) 
to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lysergic acid diethylamide (7315)..........  I
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to bulk manufacture small quantities of the listed 
controlled substances as radiolabeled compounds. No comments or 
objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in title 
21, United States Code, section 823(a) and determined that the 
registration of American Radiolabeled Chemical, Inc. to manufacture the 
listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at 
this time. DEA has investigated American Radiolabeled Chemical, Inc. on 
a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is 
consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
audits of the company's records, verification of the company's 
compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's 
background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 
0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the 
above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes 
of controlled substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: November 20, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-30936 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-9-M
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 4, 2008*

#### KENNETH R. MASTON VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-08-0110)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

*124Jason C. Workman, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when his 1989 Honda Civic struck a hole on Pennsylvania Avenue in Charleston, Kanawha County. Pennsylvania Avenue is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to make an award in this claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred at approximately 2:00 p.m. on March 17, 2008. Pennsylvania Avenue is a three-lane, paved road. At the time of the incident, claimant was traveling from the west side of Charleston to his home in Mink Shoals. As claimant was driving at less than twenty-five miles per hour, his vehicle struck a hole in the road. Mr. Maston testified that the hole was situated between Washington Street and Women & Children’s Hospital and was approximately eight to ten inches long, four or five inches wide, and six inches deep. Claimant testified that he travels this road almost daily and had tried to avoid the holes on this road on prior occasions. Although claimant was aware of the road condition, he took this road because it was the main route to his home rather than driving on the interstate. As a result of this incident, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage to its right, front tire, and the vehicle’s wheels had to be re-aligned. Thus, claimant incurred damages in the amount of $ 120.17.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Pennsylvania Avenue. The respondent did not present any witnesses at the hearing.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins v. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman*v. *Dep’t. of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had, at the least, constructive notice of the hole which claimant’s vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. The size of the hole and the time of year in which this incident occurred leads the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this hazardous condition. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent and claimant may make a recovery for the damage to his vehicle.

In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimants in the amount of $ 120.17.

Award of $120.17.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11

                               VALUE HEALTH, INC.
            SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                     ----------------------------------------------
                                               1996          1995           1994
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>           <C>            <C>
NET EARNINGS (LOSS)                        $64,329,000   $(27,967,000)  $59,521,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Weighted Average Number Of Shares
     Outstanding During The Year            54,448,920     53,182,815    51,936,571
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Add:
     Common Stock Equivalent Shares
   Represented By Stock Options Granted
   Related To Stock Plans                      394,946      1,160,001     2,254,001
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
     Contingently Issuable Shares                   (a)            (a)           (a)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Weighted Average Number Of Common
     Shares Used In The Computation Of
     Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share          54,843,866     54,342,816    54,190,572
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share              $      1.17   $      (0.51)  $      1.10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(a) The dilution of earnings (loss) per share represented by the inclusion of
    contingently issuable shares is less than 3%.

                                      94
Exhibit
10.1


 


HRPT PROPERTIES TRUST


 


Summary of Trustee
Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective
compensation of the trustees of HRPT Properties Trust (the “Company”) for
services as trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board
of Trustees.  The following is unchanged
from the compensation described in the Company’s proxy statement for its annual
meeting of shareholders scheduled to be held on May 10, 2005.


 


•      Each
independent trustee is entitled to receive an annual fee of $20,000, plus a fee
of $500 for each meeting attended.  Up to
two $500 fees are payable if a board meeting and one or more board committee
meetings are held on the same date.


 


•      The
chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the
nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an independent trustee, are
entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $5,000, $1,000 and $1,000,
respectively.


 


•      Each
independent trustee is entitled to receive a grant of 1,500 of the Company’s
common shares of beneficial interest on the date of each annual meeting of
shareholders (or, for trustees who are first elected or appointed at other
times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).


 


•      The
Company generally reimburses all trustees for travel expenses incurred in
connection with their duties as trustees.


 


1
D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. William Ruhl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ G. William Ruhl
|-------------------
|Name:              
|Title:             
|Date:              



1



---

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Thomas E. Morell
|--------------------
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               



2
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                       ROSS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

         Subsidiary                                                    Place of incorporation
         ----------                                                    ----------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
      1. Cardinal Data Corporation                                     Massachusetts, USA
      2. Ross Systems (U.K.) Ltd.                                      United Kingdom
      3. RossData Canada Limited                                       Canada
      4. Ross Computer Software B.V.                                   The Netherlands
      5. Ross Systems Nederland B.V.                                   The Netherlands
      6. Ross Systems Europe N.V.                                      Belgium
      7. Pioneer Software, Inc.                                        California, USA
      8. Ross Systems Deutschland GmbH                                 Germany
      9. Ross Systems Iberica                                           Spain
     10. Bizware Corporation                                           New Jersey, USA
     11. Ross Software International PTE, Ltd.                         Singapore
     12. Ross Software International (HK), Ltd.                        Hong Kong
     13. Ross Systems Canadian Holdings, Inc.                          Delaware
     14. Hi Point Systems Corporation                                  Ontario, Canada
     15. Resynt, Inc.                                                  Delaware, USA
     16. Ross Systems Auckland Limited.                                New Zealand

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 30785

Summary Calendar

PAUL PIRO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED;

GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendants

- Appellees

No. 13

- 30832

Summary Calendar

PAUL PIRO,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ;

NEX STAR BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED,

Defendants

- Appellants

Appeal s from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3: 11

- CV

- 2049 United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

July 22, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk Case: 13-30785 Document: 00512707638 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2014No. 13

- 30785 c/w 13

- 30832

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges

.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. See Rule 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH

C IR . R. 47.5.4.

2 Case: 13-30785 Document: 00512707638 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2014