alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with this  Quarterly  Report  of  UnionBanCal  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  November 5, 2004





                                    By:      /S/ DAVID I. MATSON
                                       --------------------------------------
                                                 David I. Matson
                                             Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32




<PAGE>


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ONTV, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Daniel M. Fasano, the Chief Executive
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



February 16, 2004                        By:  /s/ Daniel M. Fasano
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Daniel M. Fasano, Chief Executive
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-10571) of Harborside Healthcare
Corporation of our report dated October 22, 1997, on our audit of the combined
financial statements of Cushman Management Associates, Inc. and Affiliates,
which report is included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A.


                                                /s/ Landa & Altsher, P.C.
                                                -------------------------
                                                Landa & Altsher, P.C.


Randolph, Massachusetts
June 25, 1998
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1416

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include liability to pay

compensation under workmen’s compensation acts within the rules relating to certain personal liability assignments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include

liability to pay compensation under workmen’s compensation acts within the rules relating to certain personal

liability assignments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1416 IH

1 SECTION 1. ASSIGNMENT OF WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION

2 LIABILITY ELIGIBLE FOR EXCLUSION RELAT3 ING TO PERSONAL INJURY LIABILITY AS4 SIGNMENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 130 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

7 personal injury liability assignments) is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘, or as compensation under

9 any workmen’s compensation act,’’ after ‘‘(whether

10 by suit or agreement)’’ in the material preceding

11 paragraph (1),

12 (2) by inserting ‘‘or the workmen’s compensa13 tion claim,’’ after ‘‘agreement,’’ in paragraph (1),

14 and

15 (3) by striking ‘‘section 104(a)(2)’’ in para16 graph (2)(D) and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1) or (2) of

17 section 104(a)’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a) shall apply to claims under workmen’s com20 pensation acts filed after the date of the enactment of this

21 Act.

Æ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6714** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ERIC MARTIN VAN BUREN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Charlottesville
. Norman K. Moon , Senior District Judge. ( 3:00

- cr - 00066

- NKM

- 1 )

Submitted : September 29 , 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016

Before SHEDD , KEENAN , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Eric Martin Van Buren, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Martin Van Bu ren appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his “motion to have heard new substantive rule per the court’s discretion,” and his motion to correct his presentence report pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36
. Van Buren also appeals the district cour t’s subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Van Buren , No. 3:00

- cr 00066

- NKM

- 1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2016 ; May 20, 2016 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Edwards, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), both rendered September 28, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree (two counts), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for *632leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
rtmott

In The

(tfourt of Appeals

For The

iTtrst Supreme Svtbtcvd Btstrtrt of ©exas

NO. 01-87-00137-CV

VALERO TRANSMISSION COMPANY, APPELLANT

V.

MITCHELL ENERGY CORPORATION, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

of Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 85-05219

OPINION ON REHEARING

In its motion for rehearing, Valero Transmission Company urges the

same arguments as in its original appeal, but also contends that an order of the Texas

Railroad Commission, rendered after the temporary injunction was entered in this

case, requires that our opinion be withdrawn and the injunction dissolved.

On original submission, we held that under the proper standard of

review, Valero had not carried its burden to show that the injunction was illegal or

required Valero to take gas in violation of Texas law. The temporary injunction
requires Valero to take from Mitchell Energy an amount of gas equal to the prorated

allowable set for Mitchell's wells by the Texas Railroad Commission. To prevent lease

loss, Valero must take an amount equal to one day's production from each well, but

again only if that amount does not exceed the well's prorated allowable. Thus, the

injunction's requirements are expressly tied to the legally allowed production quotas

set by the Texas Railroad Commission. Valero has not proven its defense of illegality.

In a separate proceeding before the Texas Railroad Commission, Valero

apparently sought to have Mitchell's well allowables set at zero, and was successful.

Valero now contends that this result, and the Commission's order, vitiates our

interpretation of the Texas Natural Resources Code and Railroad Commission

regulations. Although some language in the Railroad Commission's order may appear

inconsistent with our own findings, Mitchell correctly points out that that order is not

properly before this Court. We are limited to the record made in the trial court. We

do not know what evidence the Railroad Commission considered or whether the issues

before it were identical to those before the trial court in the instant case. We

therefore cannot say that the Railroad Commission's order is dispositive of the issues

in this appeal.

Moreover, the temporary injunction is not inconsistent with the Railroad

Commission's order. Again, the injunction's requirements are specifically defined

with reference to the allowables set by the Texas Railroad Commission. Thus, because

Mitchell's allowables are now set at zero, and the injunction requires Valero to take

only the amount of Mitchell's allowable, Valero is not currently required by the

injunction to take any gas under the contract.

-2-
*r

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

/s/ Frank G. Evans

FRANK G. EVANS,

Chief Justice

Justices Cohen and Hoyt also sitting.

Publish. Tex. R. App. P. 90.

Judgment Rendered and Opinion Delivered January 14, 1988.

True Copy Attest:

1(^CkJC£i~*l^^yyO \^^>Q-4

Kathryn Coxt^

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1668 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1668

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To rename a waterway in the State of New York as the ``Joseph Sanford 
                             Jr. Channel''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOSEPH SANFORD JR. CHANNEL.
    (a) In General.--The waterway in the State of New York designated 
as the ``Negro Bar Channel'' shall be known and redesignated as the 
``Joseph Sanford Jr. Channel''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the waterway referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph 
Sanford Jr. Channel''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Dave Côté, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Packeteer, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors: (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated: May 8, 2008 /s/ Dave Côté   Dave Côté   Chief Executive Officer
L AW O FFICES 

# G AROFALO 

# G OERLICH 

# H AINBACH PC

1200 N EW H AMPSHIRE A VENUE NW S UITE 59 0

W

ASHINGTON DC 20036

- 6802

A

ARON A. G OERLICH T ELEPHONE 202 776

- 3970

D IRECT D IAL 202 776

- 3974 F ACSIMILE 202 776

- 3975

AG OERLICH @ GGH

- AIRLAW

. COM WWW

. GGH

- AI RLAW

. COM

November 10, 2014

VIA ELECTRONIC DELIVERY

Ms. Dorothy Beard

Chief, Documentary Services

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue , S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Docket DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0 172 ( Nordic Global Airlines )

Dear Ms. Bea rd:

Pursuant to the conditions of the Foreign Air Carrier Permit issued to Nordic Global

Airlines by Order 2012

- 1

- 29 , please find attached the carrier’s current Air Operator Certificate

and Operations Specifications issued by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency. These documents

took effect October 28, 2014, and are submitted for inclusion in the referenced docket. Thank

you.

Sincerely,

Aaron A. Goerlich

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

Coun s el for Nordic Global Airlines OY

cc : Robert Finamore, DOT

Brett Kruger, DOT
<PAGE>   1
          EXHIBIT 21 TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR FRONTSTEP, INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<PAGE>   2

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   SUBSIDIARY NAME                                                         JURISDICTION OF          PERCENTAGE OF SECURITIES
                                                                           ORGANIZATION             HELD DIRECTLY/INDIRECTLY
                                                                                                    BY REGISTRANT
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ --------------------------
<S>                                                                        <C>                      <C>
   Symix Computer Systems (Mexico) S. De R.L. de C.V.                      Mexico                   100%
   Frontstep (Canada) Inc.                                                 Ontario, Canada          100%
   Frontstep (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (formerly Symix Computer Systems           Malaysia                 87%
   (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd).
   Frontstep (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (formerly Symix Computer Systems         Singapore                87%
   (Singapore) Pte Ltd.).
   Frontstep Pty Ltd.  (formerly Symix Computer Systems (Australia) Pty    Australia                87%
   Ltd).
   Frontstep (Hong Kong) Limited (formerly Symix Computer Systems (Hong    Hong Kong                87%
   Kong) Limited).
   Frontstep (Thailand) Ltd.                                               Thailand                 99%
   Frontstep Limited (formerly Symix New Zealand, Limited).                New Zealand              87%
   Frontstep B.V.                                                          Netherlands              100%
   Symix (U.K.) Limited.                                                   United Kingdom           100%
   Frontstep GmbH.                                                         Germany                  100%
   Symix Italia S.r.l.                                                     Italy                    100%
   Symix France, SA                                                        France                   99%
   Frontstep (UK) Ltd.                                                     United Kingdom           100%
   Frontstep (Europe) Limited                                              United Kingdom           100%
   Symix Japan Ltd.                                                        Japan                    85%
   Symix Computer Systems (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.                              Shanghai, China
   Symix Computer Systems Delaware, Inc.                                   Delaware                 100%
   Frontstep distribution.com, inc.                                        Ohio                     100%
   Frontstep Solutions Group, Inc.                                         Ohio                     100%
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than December 18, 2000. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272: 

                    1.                     *Carl W. Ellis,*                    Perryton, Texas; to acquire additional voting shares of FirstPerryton Bancorp, Inc., Perryton, Texas, and FirstPerryton Delaware, Inc., Dover, Delaware, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of First Bank Southwest, N.A., Amarillo, Texas.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 28, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-30758 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit        10.11**

| **Surge                  Global Energy (Canada) Ltd.** | **March                  3, 2005** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| **2600,                  144 - 4****th****Avenue SW**  |                               |
| **Calgary,                  Alberta**                  |                               |
| **T2P                  3N4**                           |                               |

**DEEP        WELL OIL & GAS, INC.**

**NORTHERN        ALBERTA OIL LTD.**

| RE: |   | Farmout                  Agreement Dated February 25, 2005Extension                  for Payment of Prospect Fee |
|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**DEEP        WELL OIL & GAS, INC.**
**Deep        Well**
**NORTHERN        ALBERTA OIL LTD.**
**Northern**

| /s/                  Fred Kelly                                                        |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Fred                  Kelly, President, CEO                                            |   |
|                                                                                   |   |
| Agreed                  to and Accepted this 3rd                  Day of March 2005 By |
|                                                                                   |   |
| /s/                  Steven Gawne                                                      |   |
| Deep                  Well Oil & Gas, Inc.                                         |   |
| Steven                  Gawne                                                          |   |
|                                                                                   |   |
| /s/                  Curtis Sparrow                                                    |   |
| Northern                  Alberta Oil Ltd.                                             |   |
| Curtis                  Sparrow                                                        |   |

----