10/27/2015

Attn: 

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 

20590

RE: PEGASUS AVIATION REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE 

OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI 

Phantom 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION 

AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Charles Morgan 

President 

Pegasus Aviation LLC

19991 E Elaine Circle

Queen Creek, AZ

85142

602-369-7421

charlie.pegasus@live.com
TABLE of CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS 3 

SUMMARY 3

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER 4 

BACKGROUND 4 

BASIS FOR PETITION 5 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER 6 

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH PEGASUS AVIATION LLC

SEEKS EXEMPTION 7 

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF PEGASUS AVIATION LLCSEEKS AND THE REASON THE 

PEGASUS AVIATION LLC GROUP SEEKS THE RELIEF

10 

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING PEGASUS AVIATION LLC REQUEST WOULD BE 

IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 12 

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION TO PEGASUS AVIATION LLC

WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY 14 

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER 25 

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT 

PEGASUS AVIATION LLC REQUEST 25 

CONCLUSION 25 

APPENDICES 26
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing
SUMMARY

Pegasus Aviation seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned 

Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Pegasus Aviation LLC to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System 

(UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of, residential and 

commercial real estate, civil landscapes and events over certain areas of the United States. 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

The objective of Pegasus Aviation LL C and our Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) aerial 

operations is to provide a more affordable, high-quality production system for a variety of 

governmental, commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting 

• Real Estate Valuation

• Appraisals 

• Real-estate marketing 

• Economic development 

• Civic landmarks 

• Special event coverage

• Private and governmental training 

My staff has safely flown small RC electric quadcopters recreationally for approximately 9 years 

collectively without incident. 

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3, UAS

Pegasus Aviation LLC seeks an exemption to operate DJI Phantom 3 system for compensation or hire 

within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 is vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a 

Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 3 has 

a maximum gross weight of approximately 2.8 lb. while having a diagonal dimension of 23.2”, a 

maximum speed of approximately 16.4’fps and a maximum flying height of 400'. The DJI Phantom 3 is 

equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors.
The DJI Phantom 3 that will be operated by Pegasus Aviation LLC will be registered in accordance with 

49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration, and marked in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking.

BASIS FOR PETITION 

Petitioner, Pegasus Aviation LLC pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. 

§ 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for 

Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI 

Phantom 3, UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 

14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 

91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, Pegasus Aviation LLC operation of DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of 

FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, Pegasus Aviation LLC requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will 

be ensured. Pegasus Aviation LLC will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform 

maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and 

practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 

Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Pegasus Aviation LLC will document and maintain all maintenance 

records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Pegasus Aviation LLC to the extent necessary to allow a 

Pilot in Command (PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom UAS in a manner consistent with this 

exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from 

people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Pegasus Aviation LLC seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

Subpart H. As such, Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that they will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in 

an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS are in compliance with the 

operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual), and that 

the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight. 6 
Pegasus Aviation LLC also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled 

Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. 

However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global 

Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks 

from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with 

Pegasus Aviation LLC operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet 

AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. Additionally, Pegasus Aviation LLC seeks 

an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR 

conditions.

Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with 

enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 23 minutes. Battery power indicators 

are also able to show exactly how much battery power is left, as well as how much time is needed to 

return safely back to point of take off. 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Pegasus Aviation LLC provides the following information in support 

of its petition for exemption:

A. Name and Address of the Petitioner. 

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is: Charles Morgan 19991 E Elaine Circle 

Queen Creek, AZ 85142 (602) 369-7421

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption.

1. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) and (b) 

prescribe the following, in relevant part: 

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an 

aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for 

compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 
2. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. 

3. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part: 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as 

the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating—

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to—

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical 

miles of the aircraft; 

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the 

current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or 

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or 

an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection 

(b), states the following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind 

and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, 

assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes. 

5. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or 

operator of an aircraft—

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required 

inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as 

prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] 

6. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1) 
Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration, 

subsection (a)(1), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless—

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this 

chapter[.] 

7. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 

91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, 

within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had –

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been 

approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or 

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 

21 of this chapter. 9 

8. Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 

91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner 

or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: 

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of 

the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, 

for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an 

aircraft. The records must include—

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the 

work performed; and (ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and (iii) The 

signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to 

service.

(2) Records containing the following information: 

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. 

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and 

appliance. 
(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be 

overhauled on a specified time basis. 

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection 

required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. 

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, 

for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the 

AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is 

required. 

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the 

airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances. 10 

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: 

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the 

work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed. 

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and 

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this 

chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to 

service.

C. The Extent Of Relief Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks And The Reason Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks The 

Relief. 

1. Extent Of Relief Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks And The Reason Pegasus Aviation LLCSeeks Relief From 

Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, 

is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a student pilot or higher level certificate, as 

well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight-hour and currency 

requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire. 

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private 

pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or 

employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does

not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

As set forth more fully below, Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that an equivalent level of safety will be 

maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has met 
certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate 

either the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in 

this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate 

distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Further, Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, conducted by the PIC 

pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to Pegasus Aviations business; and (2) will not 

carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Extent Of Relief Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks And The Reason Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Relief From 

Section 91.7(a). 

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent required to 

allow Pegasus Aviation LLC to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy condition prior to 

every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Pegasus 

Aviation LLC Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction 

Manual). 

Pegasus Aviation LLC seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an 

airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Pegasus Aviation 

LLC will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with 

the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3) prior to every flight, and 

further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and 

limitations below. 

3. Extent Of Relief Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks And The Reason Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Relief From 

Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations of the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio 

communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the 

ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS 

operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), Pegasus Aviation LLC 

seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero 

feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. 

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the 

extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully 

set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are 

equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a 

ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude 

information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS. 
4. Extent Of Relief Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks And The Reason Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Relief From 

Section 91.151(b). 

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested to the 

extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in 

visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 23 

minutes. Pegasus Aviation LLC seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 

91.151(b), the flight time duration of the 12 battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS will severely constrain 

the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that Pegasus Aviation LLC proposes to 

conduct pursuant to this Petition. Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS, the DJI Phantom 3 operating documents, and Pegasus Aviation LLC proposed operating 

limitations, ensure that Pegasus Aviation LLC will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with 

enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 23 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks And The Reason Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Relief 

From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b). 

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft 

with an airworthiness certificate, Pegasus Aviation LLC requests relief from these Sections because the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness 

certificate. Accordingly, Pegasus Aviation LLC will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Pegasus Aviation LLC Aerial Operations Manual, 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Pegasus Aviation 

LLCwill document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

D. The Reasons Why Granting Pegasus Aviation LLC Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That Is, 

How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. 

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Pegasus Aviation LLC to safely, 

efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of real estate valuation, special 

events and civic landscape over certain areas of the United States. Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 

3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the 

economy. Notably, the benefits of Pegasus Aviation LLC proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to 

the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of manned 

aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as 
increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. Furthermore, by reducing the 

number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and 

departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airport to takeoff or land. 

Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result 

in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, 

arrival, and landing phases of flight operations. 

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly 

benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during 

traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric 

motors, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally 

conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically 

utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of leaded 

aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also 

eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an 

internal combustion engine. By using the DJI Phantom 3 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the 

substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with 

traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. 

Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

(weighing approximately 2.8 pounds at their maximum gross weight with diagonal dimension of 23.2 

inches, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property 

on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations 

(weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, 

and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons). 

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Benefit The 

Economy. 

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are also an economical alternative to 

using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

will allow United States based companies, like Pegasus Aviation, to remain competitive and contribute 

to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental 

Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and 

operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. 

Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS is one such technology that not only allows 

companies greater operational 14 flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility 

without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft. 
By operating the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, companies such as Pegasus Aviation LLC can remain competitive 

and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will 

ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. 

companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce that 

increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to 

invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and 

abroad. 

4. There Are No Privacy Issues. 

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, 

Pegasus Aviation LLC proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not implicate any privacy issues. 

Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., 

Pegasus Aviation LLC Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 

Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement 

notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The 

Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From Which 

Pegasus Aviation LLCSeeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Meet The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. 

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, Pegasus Aviation LLC operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions 

of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 

21, Subpart H. 

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth 

requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part: 

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 

days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the 

plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this 

Act. 15 
(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under subsection 

(a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum—

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, 

speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within 

visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public 

or pose a threat to national security; and 

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness 

certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of 

unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1). 

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section that certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall 

establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system. 

In seeking this exemption, Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS can operate safely 

in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a 

threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability. 

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth by the DJI Phantom 3 User 

Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A. 

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Global Positioning Modes Enable The UAS To Remain Within A 

Defined Operational Area.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS may be operated in both manual and global positioning flight modes. A 

complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is provided at 

pages 11 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual attached hereto as Appendix A. 

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In 

The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation. 

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds 

or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not reacquire control link data from the 

GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and the will return to the home position (i.e., 

failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown. A complete 

description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth at pages 12 through 14 

of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.
iv. The DJI Phantom 3 GCS and Its Operation. 

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 GCS and flight 

control software is provided at pages 23 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual. DJI Phantom 

3 User Manual is attached hereto as Appendix A. 

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot 

in Command With A Safety Observer. 

Pegasus Aviation LLC video production staff will be the only persons to act as a pilot in command 

(PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. Additionally, a safety observer will assist him at all times during 

flight time. 

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, Pegasus Aviation LLC proposes to commercially operate DJI Phantom 3 

UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United 

States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations. 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft 

described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing less than 55 pounds maximum 

gross weight: DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other 

aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the 

purpose of aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special 

request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This 

requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective 

lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted. 17 

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS 

requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to 

communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight 

operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her 

designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the 

functions prescribed in the operating documents. 
8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and 

avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to 

operate the camera or other instruments. 

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS 

operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists 

between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures 

outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of 

exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the 

procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its 

operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present 

updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also 

present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant 

of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis 

upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to 

its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions 

arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for 

safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the 

aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and 

the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be 

included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly 

documented in the aircraft records. 

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a 

functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the 

aircraft records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable 

components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating 

documents. 

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, 

overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping 

requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, 

alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft 

records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of 

the authorized person returning the UAS to service. 
15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety 

Bulletins. 

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action 

taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot student certificate and at least a current 

medical certificate. 

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s 

qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner 

consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and 

emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles 

and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 

C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the 

terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated 

training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not 

essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is 

required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of 

operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted 

on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as 

required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be 

made available to the Administrator upon request. 

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a predetermined 

location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the 

operating documents. 

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in 

accordance with the operating documents. 

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended 

landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 
25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver 

or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This 

COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 

hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be 

conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of 

airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N)Number) 

markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as 

practicable. 

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and 

control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other 

appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents 

must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations 

and activities at all times. 

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons 

(persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and 

structures unless: a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating 

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that 

nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where 

nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight 

operations must cease immediately and/or; b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or 

structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted 

permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those 

objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and; 20 c. Operations nearer 

to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those 

persons per § 91.119(a). 

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land 

owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted. 

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the 
FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the 

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: 

www.ntsb.gov.

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) 

will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has 

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely 

operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and 

emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures. 

Considering Pegasus Aviation LLC proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forthabove; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial 

pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS, Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of 

a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for Pegasus 

Aviation LLC specific proposed flight operations. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 

11160, 11161). 

Pegasus Aviation LLC will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has 

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 UAS training and 

currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner 

consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those 21 hours 

as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the 

exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in 

the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained 

in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during Pegasus 

Aviation LLC proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience 
that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as 

follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the 

purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and 

logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft 

pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations 

under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 

hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations 

under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to 

be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 

hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS

rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and 

landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the 

flight-hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build 

proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The 

FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with 

applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experiencebuilding flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required 

flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights the PIC is required to 

operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. 

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15. 

Accordingly, Pegasus Aviation LLC will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with 

the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances 

from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not Adversely Affect 

Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every 

flight, Pegasus Aviation LLC will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition based 

upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and limitations 

herein. 

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 

11159, 11160, 11161). 
4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not Adversely Affect 

Safety. 

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude 

information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio 

communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of 

the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with Pegasus Aviation LLC operation of 

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety 

equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed 

onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by 

the UAS at ground level. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 

11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 

11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why an Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not Adversely 

Affect Safety. 

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 

91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (2) the limitations on 

the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingly, 

Pegasus Aviation LLCwill ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 23 

minutes. 

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; the limitations 

on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an 

equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured 

as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAS 

experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery 

power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery 23 power. At the critically low battery level, 

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will descend and land automatically. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is 

not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are 

considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums 

prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has 

previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material 

respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 

11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. 
In seeking this exemption, Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard 

to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Pegasus Aviation LLC will use 

trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using 

the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Pegasus Aviation 

LLCAerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). 

Furthermore, Pegasus Aviation LLC will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS. 

Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, Pegasus 

Aviation LLCwill maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), 

and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals are attached hereto as Appendix A and B; a 

copy of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as Appendix C.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Pegasus Aviation LLC will use 

trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using 

the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. 

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 

91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be performed 

by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly 

maintenance log. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the 

technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. 

In consideration of Pegasus Aviation LLC proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and 

the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, Pegasus Aviation LLC submits that safety will not be 

adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2),

91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 

11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 

11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. 

§ 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Pegasus Aviation LLC requests that the FAA prescribe special 

conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which contain such safety standards 

that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe 

operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain 
areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for 

considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a 

threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without 

airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe 

operation of the UAS in the NAS. 

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation 

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. 

Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following: 

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of 

a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes 

special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in 

accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, 

aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to 

that established in the regulations. 

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. 

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special 

conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which contain such safety 

standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that 

established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 25 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

 A Summary That Can Be Published in the Federal Register, stating: The Rules From Which 

Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks Exemption: 

Pegasus Aviation LLC seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

 A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Pegasus Aviation LLC Seeks: 

This exemption will permit Pegasus Aviation LLC to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft 

System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the 

United States. 

 Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support Pegasus Aviation LLC 

Request. 

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 
(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may 

operate safely in the NAS. As such, Pegasus Aviation LLC request for exemption may be granted 

pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. 

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to 

users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the 

authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. 

As discussed in detail above, Pegasus Aviation LLC will operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS safely in the NAS, 

without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national 

security.

CONCLUSION 

As set forth herein, Pegasus Aviation LLC seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 

333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of 

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this 

Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing Pegasus Aviation 

LLCto safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS. 

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Pegasus Aviation LLC respectfully requests that the Administrator grant 

this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading 

Edge to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography over certain areas of the United States. 
Dated: 27 Oct 2015

Respectfully submitted, 

Charles Morgan 

President 

Pegasus Aviation LLC

19991 E Elaine Circle

Queen Creek, AZ

85142

602-369-7421

charlie.pegasus@live.com

Appendices: A – Link to DJI Phantom 3 Manual: Copy on link below 

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manua

l_v1.2_en.pdf