alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71301-71306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: DoD, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

ACTION: Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 218. This 
bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. 
Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto 
Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United 
States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. 
Bulletin Number 218 is being published in the Federal Register to 
assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 1, 2000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation 
Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental 
United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin 
Number 217. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by 
mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the 
Federal Register now constitute the only notification of revisions in 
per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of 
Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please 
contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[[Page 71302]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30NO00.000


[[Page 71303]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30NO00.001


[[Page 71304]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30NO00.002


[[Page 71305]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30NO00.003


[[Page 71306]]


[FR Doc. 00-30479 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C`
1 

### Werner, Christopher

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:53 AM To: Lorang, Phil; Werner, Christopher; Beaver, Melinda Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 1 3563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirement s for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55) Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_13563 _03_14_2016 RH NPRM w....docx

Attached please find the summary of interagency com ments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the draft propos ed rule entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirement s for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55). The interagency comments are in response to the last RLSO version s ubmitted to OMB for review. I accepted all changes from that version and the interagency comments within this ve rsion are new.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any co mments or questions.

Aaron L. Szabo Policy Analyst Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget 202-395-3621 Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
#### McRUFFIN v. STATE.

No. 20229.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1939.

Cunningham & Lipscomb, of Bonham,' Tor appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of .Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of having violated the liquor law and his punishment ■was assessed at a fine of $100.

It was charged in the information that on the 7th day of June, 1938, appellant, in Fannin County, Texas, did unlawfully prescribe more than one pint of whisky to Troy Thompson in one day. That said county, at and before the 7th day of June, 1938, was dry area by reason of an election theretofore held in accordance with law to determine whether or not the sale of intoxicating liquor should be prohibited within said' county. It was further charged fhat appellant was licensed to practice medicine in this state for treatment of human ailments.

Appellant’s first complaint is that the court erred in declining to sustain his motion to quash the complaint and information. He contends that there is nothing in the caption or title clause of the liquor control law covering the giving of a prescription by a physician for more than one pint of liquor to any one person in any one day. The caption to the Amendment of Chapter 467, Acts of the Second Called Session of the 44th Legis. (enacted by the First Called Session of the 45th Legis., Chap. 13, p. 1760), Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq., among other things, reads as follows: “ * * * Further regulating the traffic in alcoholic beverages in this State and prescribing penalties for violations thereof; * * * ”

We think the language in the caption is sufficiently broad to include the offense charged in the information.

His next contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. After a careful review of the testimony, we are inclined to agree with him. There is nowhere any testimony in the record which shows that appellant was a physician licensed to practice medicine in this State. Such proof was indispensible to sustain a conviction of the offense charged. Since it was necessary to charge in the information that appellant was a physician, licensed to practice medicine in this state, it was equally necessary to offer proof in support thereof.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and ápproved by the Court.
No. 72-988.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir.

Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 FOR FINE
HOST CORPORATION, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011584
<NAME> FINE HOST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1996
<CASH>                                           3,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,850
<PP&E>                                          21,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,923
<SALES>                                         88,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,996
<CGS>                                           79,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,084)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5180 September Term, 2022 1: 22-c v -005 45-UNA Filed O n: Decem ber 1 6, 2 022 Davi d E arl W attle ton ,

App ellant
v . Fede ral Bure au of

Prisons, Joh n o r Jane Doe, Director,

App ellee
ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Kat sas, W alker, a nd Childs, Circuit Ju dges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder f iled A pril 22, 20 22, be af f irmed . A ppe llant co nced es th at t he district cou rt correctly conclud ed tha t it lacke d jurisdiction insofar as the ap pellan t see ks to challen ge an orde r issued by this cou rt. T he district cou rt also correctly conclude d th at a ppe llant failed to st ate a cla im a gainst the Director of

the Bu reau of

Prisons upo n which relief cou ld be granted . S ee 28 U.S.C. § 19 15(e )(2)(B)( ii). In a dditio n, t o th e e xten t ap pellan t see ks a re f und f rom this court or rescission of

a fee orde r issued by this cou rt in 2 003 , th at re quest is d enie d for the sam e rea son this co urt h as d enie d a ppe llant’s p rev ious re quests for similar relief

. See W attle ton v. Dodrill, 589 F. Ap p’x 540 (D.C. Cir. 20 14); In re : W attle ton , No. 13- 521 6, u npu blished orde r (D.C. Cir . Se pt. 27, 20 13); In re : W attle ton , No. 13-5 075 , unp ublishe d o rder (D.C. Cir. June 19 , 20 13). Ap pellan t failed to ch allenge t he previously

asse ssed f iling fe e in the case w here the fee was a ssessed , an d h e ca nno t seek relief

in th is case. Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5180 September Term, 2022
of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam

Page 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

*Date and Time:*                     Tuesday, December 5, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.                

*Place:*                     999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.                

*Status:*                     This Meeting Will Be closed to the Public.                

*Items To Be Discussed:*                     Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.                

*Date and Time:*                     Thursday, December 7, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.                

*Place:*                     999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor)                

*Status:*                     This Meeting Will Be Open to the Public.                

*Items To Be Discussed:*                     Correction and Approval of Minutes. Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-34: SAPPI Fine Paper North America/S.D. Warren Company by counsel, Brett G. Kappel. Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-37: U.S. Representative Tom Udall. Administrative Matters.                

*Person to Contact for Information:*                     Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.                

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-30643  Filed 11-28-00; 12:02 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
----

List of marketing authorisations granted by the EEA EFTA States for the second half of 2005

(2006/C 291/20)

With reference to EEA Joint Committee Decision No 74/1999 of 28 May 1999, the EEA Joint Committee is invited to note, at the meeting on 2 June 2006, the following lists concerning marketing authorisations for medicinal products for the period 1 June — 31 December 2005:

----

ANNEX I

1.   New Marketing Authorisations:

The following marketing authorisations have been granted in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 June — 31 December 2005:

----

ANNEX II

2.   Renewed Marketing Authorisations

The following marketing authorisations have been renewed in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 June — 31 December 2005:

----

ANNEX III

3.   Extended Marketing Authorisations

The following marketing authorisations have been extended in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 June — 31 December 2005:

----

ANNEX IV

4.   Withdrawn Marketing Authorisations

The following marketing authorisations have been withdrawn in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 June — 31 December 2005:

----

ANNEX V

5.   Suspended Marketing Authorisations

The following marketing authorisations have been suspended in the EEA EFTA States during the period 1 June — 31 December 2005:

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                           19,743
<SECURITIES>                     86,415
<RECEIVABLES>                    24,403
<ALLOWANCES>                        380
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                132,971
<PP&E>                          202,117
<DEPRECIATION>                   47,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  289,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            30,673
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                          4,147
<OTHER-SE>                      254,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    289,194
<SALES>                          32,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 54,653
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    33,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  23,849
<INCOME-TAX>                      9,583
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              14,266
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     14,266
<EPS-BASIC>                      0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.86


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Advisors to the Superintendent, Naval 
Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Advisors to the Superintendent, Naval 
Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, will meet to elicit the 
advice of the board on the Navy's Postgraduate Education Program. All 
sessions will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 16, and 
Thursday, February 17, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, 
Arlington, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate 
School, Monterey, CA 93943-5000, telephone number (831) 656-2514.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The board examines the effectiveness with 
which the Navy's Postgraduate Education School is accomplishing its 
mission. To this end, the board will inquire into the curricula; 
instruction; physical equipment; administration; state of morale of the 
student body, faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters 
relating to the operation of the Naval Postgraduate School as the board 
considers pertinent.

    Dated: February 1, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-3104 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
Exhibit 99

                              Intellectual Property

The trade names  "BeautyBuys",  "NetCigar",  and  "Cigargold.com" for which U.S.
trademark applications have been filed.

THE COMPANY OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES ARE LICENSED TO USE THE FOLLOWING TRADEMARKS:

Suarez Gran Reserve       Breton Legend   Breton Corojo Vintage   Nativos
Corojo 2000               Andulleros      Alimerante              MikeDitka
Don Otilio

THE COMPANY OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES OWN THE ADDITIONAL DOMAIN NAMES:

REGISTERED TO SYNERGY BRANDS INC.:

SYBR.COM                ADD2CART.COM
SYNERGYBRANDS.COM       SALEBYNET.COM
BEAUTYBONUS.COM**       DEALBYNET.COM
SALONCOUNTER.COM**      DEALBUYNET.COM
FRAGANCESALON.COM**     BEAUTYBUYS.COM**
GLOBALSALON.COM**       BEAUTYBUY.COM**
FRAGRANCESALON.COM**    CIGARGOLD.COM
SALONBUY.COM**

REGISTERED TO NETCIGAR.COM, INC.:

NETCIGAR.COM
COROJO2000.COM

** Denotes  ownership by BeautyBuys  regardless of which entity  registered  the
domain name.

     The Company  also is studying the  advantages  and  marketing  potential of
establishing  private  label sales in the health and beauty  aids and  cosmetics
business  areas to take  advantage  of certain  inroads  to these type  consumer
products the Company has  historically  located and developed.  The Company also
has  entered  multiple  licensing  and  production   agreements   regarding  the
establishment of internet sites for sale of the Company's products.  The Company
has trademarked its websites on the internet.

                                      EX-99
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,402
<SECURITIES>                                    35,649
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,792
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,611
<PP&E>                                          11,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,715
<SALES>                                         29,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,728
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,587)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,087)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,087)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
# XcelEnergy·M

August 28, 2015 Joe Kordzi EPA's South Central Region (Region 6) Air Planning Section (6PD-L) Environmental ProtectionAgency 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 DocketNo. EPA-R06-0AR-2014-0754 Re: Proposed Approval/Disapproval ofTexas and OklahomaRegional Haze State ImplementationPlans; Federal Implementation Planfor Regional Haze DearMr. Kordzi: Southwestern Public Service Company ("SPS") d/b/a Xcel Energy ("Xcel Energy") respectfully submits the following response to your electronic mail request dated August 27, 2015 regarding additional information inregard water availability at Tolle Station. The map we provided in Attachment 1 ofour August 26, 2015 response is the depiction of our cu11'ent water rights in question. This is the green shaded area and includes all water rights retained and acquired to date with well field locations. None ofthese water rights are sold, shared or leased. They are all retained and used by Tolk and PlantX. The initial calculation you provided us regarding annual water availability assumed a constant annual withdrawal rate. It also assumed the aquifer is an infinite resource without recognizing the limitations we described in ourresponses. The estimate ofavailable water between 94,000 acre-feet and 109,000 acre-feet provided in our latest response is the total water available, recognizing the limitations as we reach 40 feet ofsaturation. Whatever the amount withdrawn each year, this estimate is the limit ofthe total water available for Tolle and PlantX.Mr. Joe Kordzi 2 August 28, 2015 Xcel Energy appreciates EPA's consideration ofthisresponse to EPA's informationrequest in its efforts to finalize the rule. Additionally, Xcel Energy formally requests this response be placed in DocketNo. EPA-R06-0AR-2014-0754. Ifyou shouldhave any questions, please contactme at 303- 571-2762 orAnn Seha at 612-215-4619
.

. Very truly yours,

JeffWest Director, Environmental Services Xcel Energy Inc.
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 20375.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 19, 1939.

Harvey P. Shead, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

' KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 6 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense, and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.