alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.





/s/ Jack BravermanJack BravermanChief Financial OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.





May 13, 2011





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trimol Group, Inc. and will be retained by Trimol Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      STEVEN L. WATSON |   |
|---------------------------|--------|

| /s/      JAMES W. BROWN |   |
|-------------------------|--------|

| Note: | The      certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed      “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that      Section.  Registration Statements or other documents filed with      the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit      by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such      filing. |
|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 19736.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1938.

Rehearing Denied May 18,1938.

Gray & Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

. Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s A-tty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Conviction is for violation of the liquor laws- of this state; the punishment being assessed at a fine of $200.

The record is here without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment will be affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Amendment to Approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988, Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on 
Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of 
the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the 
Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Regulation of Class III 
Gaming Between the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon and 
the State of Oregon, which was executed on November 17, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective December 6, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: November 27, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-31025 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<CURRENCY>                       U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                 10,091
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          62,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      108,041
<PP&E>                                 28,784
<DEPRECIATION>                          7,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        364,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  43,935
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  215
<OTHER-SE>                            173,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          364,601
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      149,113
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         134,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        12,413
<INCOME-TAX>                            4,717
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     7,696
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            7,696
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.34



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40023

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROGELIO VEGA-CHAVEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-632-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rogelio Vega-Chavez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vega-Chavez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Small Business Issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.
  Dated: March 21, 2008
    By:
    /s/ ROBERT SNUKALROBERT SNUKALCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Dated: March 21, 2008
    By:
    /s/ LEONARDO BEREZOVSKYLEONARDO BEREZOVSKYCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30846]



[[Page 75955]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


CORRECTION-- Notice of Inventory Completion for Native American 
Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects in the Possession of the 
Anthropological Studies Center, Archaeological Collections Facility, 
Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA; and in the Control of the 
California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA

AGENCY: National Park Service.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with provisions of the Native 
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 43 CFR 10.9, 
of the completion of an inventory of human remains and associated 
funerary objects in the possession of the Anthropological Studies 
Center (ASC), Archaeological Collections Facility, Sonoma State 
University, Rohnert Park, CA; and in the control of the California 
Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), Sacramento, CA. This notice 
corrects the contact address of the Notice of Inventory Completion 
published August 16, 2000. The last paragraph of the August 16, 2000 
notice is corrected as follows: This notice has been sent to officials 
of the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria, 
California. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes 
itself to be culturally affiliated with these human remains should 
contact Tina Biorn, Environmental Program, Department of 
Transportation, P.O. Box 942094 (M.S. 19), Sacramento, CA 94274-0001, 
telephone (916) 653-0013, before August 16, 2000. Repatriation of the 
human remains to the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa 
Rancheria, California may begin after that date if no additional 
claimants come forward.

    Dated: November 17, 2000.
John Robbins,
Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnerships.
[FR Doc. 00-30846 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

# AGENCY:

General Services Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of State is cancelling the following Optional Form because of low usage:

OF 189, Travel Reimbursement Voucher

The form will be converted to a State Department form. You can request copies of the new form from: Department of State, IS/OIS/DIR, 2201 C Street, NW; Room B264NS, Washington, DC 20520-0264.

# DATES:

Effective December 5, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Barbara Williams, General Services Administration, (202) 501-0581.

Dated: October 25, 2000.

Barbara M. Williams,

Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-30900 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

# AGENCY:

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact.

Authority:42 U.S.C. 4321*et seq.;*36 CFR part 805.                    

# SUMMARY:

                        An environmental assessment on the Council's proposed revisions of its regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act was prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321*et seq.,*                         and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's NEPA regulations, 36 CFR Part 805. The environmental assessment made a preliminary determination that promulgation of the revised regulations would not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment and that preparation of an environmental impact statement would not be necessary. Notice of the availability of the environmental assessment and preliminary determination of no significant impact, and of a 30-day public comment period was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 11, 2000 (65 FR 42850). The Council has considered the comments received and has found that the proposed action will have no significant impact on the human environment. Copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact may be obtained by contacting the person listed below.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Javier Marque                                                s, Assistant General Counsel, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 809, Washington, DC 20004. (202) 606-8503.                    

Dated: December 4, 2000.

John M. Fowler,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 00-31254  Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-10-M
#### HUDGINS v. STATE.

No. 16393.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1934.

Sam H. Townsend, of Lufkin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State;

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for rape; the punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

Appellant was charged with rape on Edna Earl Alexander, who was under the age of consent, the proof showing that she was thirteen years of age at the time of the alleged offense. In the indictment it was averred that the offense was committed on or about the 27th day of May, 1932.

Prosecutrix testified to three acts of intercourse with appellant, one occurring in the latter part of May or the first of June, another in August and still another in November, all in the year 1932. After the evidence was all in, appellant, by written motion, called the court’s attention to the fact that prosecutrix had testified to the three acts mentioned, and that each act was a separate offense, and requested the court to require the state to elect upon which act it would rely for a conviction. The court overruled the motion, giving as his reason that all three acts occurred within one year prior to the date upon which the indictment was returned.

 The court fell into error in refusing to require an election by the state. This may have been caused by confusing the principle controlling elections with that regarding the reception of evidence showing more than one transaction if all occurred within the period of limitation. It is unnecessary to discuss or restate the rule of election. It has been written on many times. See Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C., § 444; Crosslin v. State, 90 Tex. Cr. R. 467, 235 S. W. 905; Turner v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 20 S.W.(2d) 764; Stone v. State, 45 Tex. Cr. R. 91, 73 S. W. 956; Cloninger v. State, 101 Tex. Cr. R. 1, 274 S. W. 596; Johnson v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 292, 8 S.W.(2d) 121; Banks v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 117, 246 S. W. 377. It cannot be held that the error was harmless in view of the penalty assessed.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

RadiSys Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement No. 333-49092 and 333-146977 on Form S-3 and registration statement No. 333-80577, 333-00514, 333-46473, 333-137060, 333-80087, 333-80089, 333-85093, 333-38966, 333-38988, 333-50582, 333-50584, 333-68362, 333-106670,333-111520, 333-116570, 333-126189, 333-142968 and 333-142969 on Form S-8 of RadiSys Corporation of our reports dated March 6, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RadiSys Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of RadiSys Corporation. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

March 6, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          38,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    173,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               336,958
<PP&E>                                          20,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,274)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,502
<OTHER-SE>                                    (407,172)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,845
<SALES>                                        440,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               440,880
<CGS>                                          177,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,037,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,785,045)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,785,045)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,785,045)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)


</TABLE>
#### STAPLETON v. STATE.

No. 16363.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 7, 1934.

Walter F. Schenek, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for murder; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts shows testimony entirely sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion. Appellant, armed with a pistol, pursued deceased into a restaurant and there fired at him twice. Deceased ran out the back door followed by appellant, and another shot was fired on the outside. Deceased died on the way to the hospital.

We do not find in the transcript any bills of exception. In the jacket containing the record on appeal, we find what purports to be four bills of exception which — as far •as we can tell — are original instruments, but none of which show to have been filed in the trial court. We cannot consider same. We find no exceptions to the court’s charge, which appears to us to properly present the case to the jury.

We note that the sentence directs the confinement of appellant in the penitentiary for “an indeterminate term of not less than five years.” The sentence is incorrect. The confinement of appellant in the penitentiary should have been directed to be for a period of time not less than two nor more than five years. The sentence will be reformed so as to correspond with the above suggestion.

As reformed, the judgment will be affirmed.
REGULATORY REVIEW LISTENING SESSION – Region 8 

3/10/11 – at the Alliance Center, downtown Denver

COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION

Oil and Gas are under-regulated – please narrow or eliminate the loop holes

Hydrofracking Study – please take a rigorous and wide-spread look

Subtitle G –Take a hard look and close loop holes

NEPA documents – consider human health impacts in NEPA reviews

NEPA needs to weigh in on green house gases

Be more aggressive with green house gasses, don’t back down

Do not streamline away – we are seeing real impacts 

EPA – continue as a watch dog via NEPA

Encourage EPA’s role as a watchdog through NEPA Program

Clean Air Act Working Group – Applaud the role of energy efficiency, reduces all pollutants

Reconsider Innovative Control Technology – create a regulatory pathway – many parties agree

Take a multi- pollutant approach (model State of Colorado) – There are synergies with green house gas 

reductions

Important to tighten green house gas regulations

Give guidance and credit for long term efforts

Use creativity and long term planning

Water – maintain focus on the vision; strengthen participation and support State programs

Federal Facilities – let’s have real clean up and monitoring

Expansion of Data Systems –enhance communication with the public

Make data transparent to everyone

Streamline data systems

NSR – look at Region 5’s approach

Time Monitoring for NAACS – Tar Sands – consider impact on the environment
Consider a distributed generation approach

Uranium – the current regulatory process is not adequate – needs adequate oversight and focus on 

prevention