T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on * * w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F e d . R . A p p . P . 3 4 ( a ) ( 2 ) .

T he H onor abl e C orm a c J . C a rne y , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f orthe * ** C e ntr a l D i s tr i c tof

C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ME R HA WI HA GO S HA I L E , a l s o k n o wn a s J im m y ; e t a l., D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 30138 D . C . N o. 2: 06 -c r- 00 02 6-R S L -6 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtS . L a s ni k, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 4, 2013 ** S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B ef ore: M cK E O W N and IK U T A , C i rc ui tJudg es , and C A RN E Y , D i stri ctJudg e. *** 

# FI LED JU N 11 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

M e rh a w i H a g o s H a ile ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s r e v o c a tio n o f h is supervi se d rel ea se . H e a dm i tt ed t o fi ve vi ol at i on s of the cond i t i on s of hi s r el ea se , a nd the di s tr i c tc ourtf

ound tha the ha d c om m i tt e d a n a ddi t i ona l f ourvi ol a t i ons r e l a t i ng t o c oc a i ne di s tr i but i on, thr e a t s , a r s on, a nd a s s oc i a t i ng w i th pe r s ons engaged i n cri m i nal ac t i vi ty and / or kn ow n fel on s. H ai l e c on t ends thathe re ce i ved i ns uf f i c i e ntnot i c e of

the “ m a ki ng thr e a t s ” a nd “ a r s on” c r i m e s l e a di ng t o the r e voc a t i on, tha tthe r e w a s i ns uf f i c i e nte vi de nc e he c om m i tt e d thos e c r i m e s , a nd tha tac ondi t i on of

hi s s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e i s va gue a nd ove rbr oa d. W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f irm . W e r e vi e w due pr oc e s s c l a i m s r a i s e d f orthe f i r s tt i m e on appe a l a nd c o n d itio n s o f

s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e n o t c h a lle n g e d in th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f o rp la in e rr o r . Un i te d S ta te s v . Wi l l i a ms , 54 7 F . 3d 11 87 , 12 02 n. 13 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( du e proces s) ; U ni te d State s v . V

ega , 5 4 5 F .3 d 7 4 3 , 7 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( c o n d itio n s o f r e le a s e ) . P l ai n err or i s “ (1) ‘ error, ’ (2) thati s ‘ pl ai n, ’ and (3) that‘ af fe ct s s ub st ant i al ri gh t s. ’ ” John son v. U

ni ted Stat es , 520 U . S . 461, 466–67 ( 1997) ( quot i ng U ni ted State s v . O lano , 50 7 U . S . 72 5, 73 2 (19 93 )) . “ If al l three cond i t i on s are m et , an ap p e lla te c o u rt m a yth e n e x e r c is e its d is c r e tio n to n o tic e af o r f e ite d e rr o r , b u t o n ly i f ( 4) the e rr ors e r i ous l ya f f e c t s the f a i rne s s , i nt e gr i ty , orpubl i c r e put a t i on of j ud i ci al proceedi ng s. ” I d. a t 4 6 7 ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s a n d c ita tio n s o m itte d ) .3

O n a ch al l en g e t o th e su ffi ci en cy o f ev i d en ce su p p o rt i n g a su p erv i sed rel ease r e v o c a tio n , “w e a s kw h e th e r , v ie w in g th e e v id e n c e in th e lig h t m o s t f a v o r ab le to th e g o v e rn m e n t, a n yr a tio n a l tr ie ro f f a c t c o u ld h a v e f

o u n d th e e s s e n tia l e le m e n ts of a vi ol at i on by a pre po nd er ance of the evi dence. ” U ni te d State s v . Ki ng , 608 F .3 d 1 1 2 2 , 1 1 2 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ; U ni ted Stat es v . J e r e m i ah , 4 9 3 F .3 d 1 0 4 2 , 1 0 4 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ; s e e al s o 18 U . S . C . § 3 58 3(e) (3). H a i l e a r gue s tha the w a s de ni e d due pr oc e s s be c aus e the vi ol a t i on pe t i t i on di d noti de nt i f

ythe s t a tut orypr ovi s i ons c orr e l a t i ng t o the c r i m e s of “ m a ki ng thr e a t s , bya i di ng a nd abe tt i ng” a nd “ a r s on, bya i di ng a nd abe tt i ng” unde r l y i ng the a l l e ga t i ons tha the vi ol a t e d the t e rm s of hi s s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e byc om m i tt i ng fed eral , st at e, o r l o cal cri m es. A d efen d an tfaci n g rev o cat i o n o f su p erv i sed rel ease is e n title d to e f

f e c tiv e w r itte n n o tic e o f

th e v io la tio n s w ith w h ic h h e is c h a r g e d . U ni ted Stat es v. H

avi er , 155 F . 3d 1090, 1093 ( 9th C i r . 1998) . “ T hus , w he n a r e voc a t i on pe t i t i on a l l e ge s the c om m i s s i on of ane w c r i m e a nd the of f e ns e be i ng c ha r ge d i s note vi de ntf r om the c ondi t i on of

pr oba t i on be i ng vi ol a t e d, ade f e nda nt i s e nt i t l ed t o rec ei ve no t i ce of the spec i fi c s t atut e he i s c harged w i th v i ol at i ng . ” I d.

H a i l e ha s note s t abl i s he d tha tthe om i s s i on of s t a tut oryc i t a t i ons f

r om the v io la tio n p e titio n w a s ap la in e rr o ra f f e c tin g h is s u b s ta n tia l r ig h ts th a t s e r io u s ly4

affected the fairness, i n t eg ri ty, o r p u b l i c rep u t at i o n o f th e rev o cat i o n p ro ceed i n g s. T he vi ol at i on pet i t i on cont ai ned a generaldesc ri pt i on of the cr i m es ati ss ue, and an ac com panyi ng re po rtse tforth the re l evantfa ctual basi s. H ai l e a l so re ce i ved actual not i c e of the appl i c abl e s t a tut e s thr ough apol i c e r e portpr ovi de d t o hi m dur i ng d i sco v ery. U n d er a h ead i n g en t i t l ed “ O ffen ses, ” th e rep o rtl i st s tw o cri m es: “A R S O N 1 S T D E G R E E [A R S O N -R E S ID E N C E -E N D A N G E R E D L IF E ]” c orr e s pondi ng t o R e vi s e d C ode of W a s hi ngt on s e c t i on “ 9A . 48. 020[ 2002] , ” a nd

“ H A R A S S M E N T N O P R E V C O N V , ” c orre spon di ng t o sec t i on “ 9A . 46 . 02 0(2). ” H a ile “c o u ld h a r d lyh a v e b e e n p u z z le d ab o u t w h a t h e h a d to d e f e n d a g a in s t” in lig h t o f th is in f o rm a tio n . U

ni ted Stat es v. Sesm a-H erna ndez , 219 F . 3d 859, 860 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) af

f’ d e n banc , 253 F . 3d 403 ( 9th C i r . 2001)

. E ve n i f the r e w a s a ny a m bi gui ty aboutthe c ha r ge s a ga i ns tH a i l e , he w a s notpr e j udi c e d be c aus e the spec i fi c s t atut es and thei r e l em ent s w er e i rr el evantt o h i s def ense , w hi ch w as base d so l el y o n m i st ak en i d en t i ty. T he r e a l s o w a s s uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e t o e s t abl i s h tha tH a i l e c om m i tt e d the c r i m e s of m a ki ng thr e a t s a nd a r s on bya i di ng a nd abe tt i ng. T he gove rnm e nt pres ent ed evi dence thatH ai l e e ng aged i n cocai ne di stri bu t i on and b ec am e i nv ol ved i n adi s put e w i th ac us t om e rove radrug de bt . H a i l e a nd a n a s s oc i a t e m a de m en ac in g statem en ts to th e c u sto m eraf ter h e r ef u se d to p ay , an d th e c u sto m er ’s5

m ot orho m e w as se tabl az e hou rs l at eras he sl epti nsi de. V i deo foo t age and ce l l ul ar t el ep h o n e reco rd s p l ace a car resem b l i n g H ai l e’ s an d a p h o n e u sed b y H ai l e i n cl o se p r o x im ityto th e m o to rh o m e w ith in m in u te s o f th e tim e th e a r s o n w a s r e p o rte d . V i ew i ng the evi dence i n the l i gh tm ostfa vo rabl e t o the go vernm ent , the di stri ct courtcoul d h ave f

ou nd by a pre po nd er ance of the evi dence thatH ai l e vi ol at ed W ash i n g t o n st at e l aw b y ai d i n g an d ab ett i n g th e co m m i ssi o n o f h arassm en tan d fi rst de gr e e a r s on . See R C W §§ 9A . 08. 020, 9A . 46. 020, 9A . 48. 020. T he c ondi t i on of

H a i l e ’ s ne w t e rm of

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e tha the not“ f r e que nt pl a c e s w he r e c ontr ol l e d s ubs t a nc e s a r e i l l e ga l l ys ol d, us e d, di s tr i but e d, or a d m in is te r e d ” is n o t im p e rm is s ib lyv a g u e o ro v e rb r o a d . W e r e c e n tlyr e je c te d th is c ont e nt i on i n U

ni te d State s v . P hi l l i

ps , 7 0 4 F .3 d 7 5 4 , 7 6 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 2 ) , a n d h e ld th a t ad is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t c o m m it p la in e rr o rin im p o s in g th is s ta n d a r d c o n d itio n . H a ile a g r e e s th a t P hi l l i

ps is d is p o s itiv e . A F F I R M E D .