alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1725 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify each alien who 

has served, or is serving, in the Armed Forces of the United States 

when any alien applies for an immigration benefit or is placed in an 

immigration enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2017 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify 

each alien who has served, or is serving, in the Armed 

Forces of the United States when any alien applies for 

an immigration benefit or is placed in an immigration 

enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Immigrant Veterans 

5 Eligibility Tracking System Act’’ or the ‘‘I–VETS Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1725 IS

1 SEC. 2. IDENTIFYING ALIENS CONNECTED TO THE ARMED 

2 FORCES. 

3 Upon an alien’s application for an immigration ben4 efit or the placement of such alien in an immigration en5 forcement proceeding, the Secretary of Homeland Security 

6 shall— 

7 (1) determine if the alien is serving, or has 

8 served, as a member of— 

9 (A) a regular or reserve component of the 

10 Armed Forces of the United States on active 

11 duty; or 

12 (B) a reserve component of the Armed 

13 Forces in an active status; and 

14 (2) annotate every immigration and naturaliza15 tion record of the Department of Homeland Security 

16 relating to an alien described in paragraph (1) to— 

17 (A) reflect that membership; and 

18 (B) afford an opportunity to track the out19 comes for each alien. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Packeteer, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David
Yntema, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date: November 8, 2002                  /s/ DAVID YNTEMA
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David Yntema
                                        Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AK-932-1430-ET; A-062024]


Public Land Order No. 7471; Extension of Public Land Order No. 
6127; Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order extends Public Land Order No. 6127 for an 
additional 20-year period. This extension is necessary to continue the 
protection of the Bureau of Land Management's Campbell Tract 
Administrative Site.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 11, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robbie J. Havens, Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 W. 7th Avenue, No. 13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599, (907) 271-5049.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Public Land Order No. 6127, which withdrew public land from 
settlement, sale, location, or entry under the general land laws, 
including the United States mining laws (30 U.S.C. Ch.2 (1994)), for 
the protection of the Campbell Tract Administrative Site, is hereby 
extended for an additional 20 years as it affects the following 
described land:

Seward Meridian

T. 12 N., R. 3 W.,
    Sec. 2, W\1/2\W\1/2\E\1/2\NW\1/4\, W\1/2\NW\1/4\, W\1/2\E\1/
2\W\1/2\SW\1/4\, and W\1/2\W\1/2\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 3, lots 1 to 4, inclusive, S\1/2\N\1/2\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, S\1/
2\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, S\1/2\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, S\1/2\NE\1/4\, SE\1/
4\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, S\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, S\1/2\SW\1/4\SE\1/
4\NW\1/4\, S\1/2\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\, SW\1/4\, and E\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 10, NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, E\1/2\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, NW\1/4\NW\1/
4\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, and N\1/2\N\1/2\N\1/2\NW\1/
4\;
    Sec. 11, NW\1/4\NW\1/4\NW\1/4\ and W\1/2\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains 730.13 acres.

    2. This withdrawal will expire 20 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1994), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
Sylvia V. Baca,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 00-30509 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
EXHIBIT 32





In connection with the Quarterly Report of True Product ID, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), William R. Dunavant, the Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.















February 13, 2008                          By:   /s/ William R. Dunavant





William R. Dunavant

President and Principal Financial Officer
#### BATEMAN v. STATE.

No. 20671.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1939.

E. C. Stovall, of Canton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for 'cattle theft, punishment assessed being six years in the penitentiary.

The in.dictment properly charges the of.fense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review and the Judgment is affirmed.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Aaron Quesnoy Keystone UAS LLC
225 Church Street 7H Philadelphia

, PA 19106

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 1178

Dear Mr. Quesnoy :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FRANKIE SYLVESTER TURNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief 

District Judge. (2:93-cr-00014-1; 2:13-cv-00255-RBS)

Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie Sylvester Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie 

Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frankie Sylvester Turner seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & 

Supp. 2013) petition as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013)

motion and dismissing it as untimely. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Turner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1592 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1592

 To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 1-
                 (3-Sulfopropyl) pyridinium hydroxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

  Mr. Bliley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 1-
                 (3-Sulfopropyl) pyridinium hydroxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1-(3-SULFOPROPYL) 
              PYRIDINIUM HYDROXIDE.

    Heading 9902.29.75 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/90'' and inserting ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Applicability.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law to 
the contrary, upon a request filed with the appropriate customs officer 
before the 90th day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any 
entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption--
            (1) which was made after December 31, 1990, and before the 
        15th day after the date of enactment of this Act; and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been no duty if 
        any amendment made by section 1 applied to such entry or 
        withdrawal;
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amendment applied to 
such entry or withdrawal.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KEN EASTERLING, §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1916-K-BH

§

U.S. BANK NATIONAL §

ASSOCIATION, §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the

Notice of Motion and Ex-Parte Emergency Motion to Stay any Further Proceedings or

Proceedings Pending Removal of Disabilities of Minority and Restoration of All Rights,

which the Court treats as a Motion and Objection, filed on April 14, 2024 (doc. 21), in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion

that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are

accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. 

Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Ex-Parte Emergency Motion to Stay any Further

Proceedings or Proceedings Pending Removal of Disabilities of Minority and Restoration

of All Rights (doc. 21) treated as a Motion is DENIED and the Objections are

OVERRULED.

Defendant U.S. Bank National Association’s Motion to Dismiss, filed September 7,

2022 (doc. 6), is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Amended Reply to Defendant’s Response to

Case 3:22-cv-01916-K-BH Document 22 Filed 04/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 531
Plaintiff’s Documents 9 and 10, Amended Jurisdiction Challenge, and Request for Summary

Judgment, Quiet Title and Damages, filed November 1, 2022 (doc. 16), is DENIED as

moot.

By separate judgment, the plaintiff’s claims against the defendant will be

DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED.

Signed April 18

th

, 2023.

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-01916-K-BH Document 22 Filed 04/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 532
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

FEBRUARY 25, 2014

 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WD75425 Michael Limley vs. State of Missouri

WD76313 Anthony Johnson vs. State of Missouri

WD76397 Emilie Gaudin vs. Division of Employment Security

WD76405 Randy Ralstin vs. State of Missouri

WD76547 Second Injury Fund vs. Daneen Pennington

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WD74260 State of Missouri vs. Melissa Thompson

WD76059 State of Missouri vs. Terry Lea Gardner

WD76072 State of Missouri vs. Demetrius L. Boyce

WD76137 State of Missouri vs. Anthony Tyrone McNack
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

BRIANNA C. MENDOZA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2761 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 24, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hendry County; Scott H. Cupp, Acting Circuit Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
BLACK, Judge.

Brianna Mendoza seeks correction of the order finding her in violation of her probation. She does not challenge the finding that she violated probation or the resulting sentence, and we affirm both without comment. But because- 2 -

the revocation order should reflect the oral pronouncement, we remand for the trial court to strike the revocation order and enter a corrected revocation order reflecting two condition 5 violations and conforming to the oral pronouncement in all other respects. See Reed v. State, 127 So. 3d 817, 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

LaROSE, C.J. and SALARIO, J., concur.
| 1.                      | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the yearended September 30, 2019 of cbdMD, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                             |                                                                                                   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.                      | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report. |                                                                                                   |   |
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |                                                                                                   |
| Dated: January 24, 2020 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | /s/ Martin A.SumichrastMartin A. Sumichrast, co-Chief Executive Officer, co-principalexecutive officer |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mark A Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Mark A. Smith      
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Mark A. Smith          
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3083]



[[Page 6437]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 3214]


Notice of Meeting; International Telecommunication Advisory 
Committee Development Sector

    The Department of State announces an open meeting for the purpose 
of preparing for and forming the U.S. Delegation to the upcoming March 
2-3, 2000 meeting of the ITU-Development Sector Telecommunications 
Development Advisory Group (TDAG). The meeting will also prepare for 
additional ITU-D meetings that includes the following: February 28: 
Gender Issues; February 29 Private Sector Subgroup of the TDAG; March 
1: ITU-D Study Groups 1&2 Management Team and TDAG Chairpersons and 
Vice-Chairs. The meeting will be held from 9:30-11:30 on Thursday, 
February 10, 2000, in Room 3524, Main State. Members of the general 
public may attend these meetings and join in the discussions, subject 
to the instructions of the Chair. Admission of public members will be 
limited to seating available. Entrance to the Department of State is 
controlled; people intending to attend this meeting should send a fax 
to 202-647-7407 no later than 24 hours before the meeting. This fax 
should provide the name of the meeting, (TDAG Prep Meeting) and date of 
the meeting, your name, social security number, date of birth, and 
organizational affiliation one of the following valid photo 
identifications will be required for admittance: U.S. driver's license, 
U.S. passport, U.S. Government identification card. Enter from the 
``C'' Street Main Lobby; in view of escorting requirements, non-
Government attendees should plan to arrive not later than 15 minutes 
before the meeting begins.

    Dated: February 3, 2000.
Doreen F. McGirr,
Chair, ITAC-D, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-3083 Filed 2-7-00; 12:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-U