alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE> 9
          <MULTIPLIER>  1,000
                 
          <S>                             <C>
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
          <PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
          <CASH>                                     384
          <INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     739
          <FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           0
          <TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
          <INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                5,435
          <INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     30,180 
          <INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       29,547
          <LOANS>                                    48,839
          <ALLOWANCE>                                378
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                             88,923
          <DEPOSITS>                                 54,566
          <SHORT-TERM>                               0
          <LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        959
          <LONG-TERM>                                19,072
          <COMMON>                                   14
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
          <PREFERRED>                                0
          <OTHER-SE>                                 14,312
          <TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             88,923
          <INTEREST-LOAN>                            2,849
          <INTEREST-INVEST>                          1,798
          <INTEREST-OTHER>                           60
          <INTEREST-TOTAL>                           4,707
          <INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         1,669
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,390
          <INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      2,317
          <LOAN-LOSSES>                              11
          <SECURITIES-GAINS>                         0
          <EXPENSE-OTHER>                            1,711
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                            710
          <INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 501
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
          <CHANGES>                                  0
          <NET-INCOME>                               501
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                              .39
          <EPS-DILUTED>                              .39
          <YIELD-ACTUAL>                             2.74
          <LOANS-NON>                                0
          <LOANS-PAST>                               128
          <LOANS-TROUBLED>                           0
          <LOANS-PROBLEM>                            881
          <ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           367
          <CHARGE-OFFS>                              1
          <RECOVERIES>                               1
          <ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          378
          <ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       0
          <ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
          <ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    378
                  
          
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated September 6, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on September 25, 2000 (65 FR 57623), Roche Diagnostics 
Corporation, 9115 Hague Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, made 
application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of alphamethadol (9605), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule I.
    The firm plans to import the alphamethadol to manufacture 
diagnostic products for distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Roche Diagnostics Corporation to 
import alphamethadol is consistent with the public interest and with 
United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated 
Roche Diagnostics Corporation on a regular basis to ensure that the 
company's continued registration is consistent with the public 
interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of 
the company's physical security systems, audits of the company's 
records, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and 
Export Act and in accordance with title 21, Code of Federal 
Regulations, section 1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as 
an exporter of the basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: November 8, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-30296 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Richard Kurtz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Photonix, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 10, 2006       /s/Richard KurtzRichard Kurtz    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1759 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend authorities relating to 

homeless veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2017 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend authorities 

relating to homeless veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Our Commit5 ment to Ending Veteran Homelessness Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO HOME7 LESS VETERANS. 

8 (a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR HOMELESS VET9 ERANS REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS.—Section 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1759 IS

1 2021(e)(1)(F) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

2 by striking ‘‘2017’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’. 

3 (b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR HOMELESS

4 WOMEN VETERANS AND HOMELESS VETERANS WITH

5 CHILDREN REINTEGRATION PROGRAM.—Section 

6 2021A(f)(1) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘2017’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘2018’’. 

8 (c) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE REFER9 RAL AND COUNSELING SERVICES FOR CERTAIN VET10 ERANS AT RISK OF HOMELESSNESS.—Section 2023(d) of 

11 such title is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2017’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2018’’. 

13 (d) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR TREATMENT

14 AND REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR SERIOUSLY MEN15 TALLY ILL AND HOMELESS VETERANS.— 

16 (1) GENERAL TREATMENT.—Section 2031(b) of 

17 such title is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

18 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2018’’. 

19 (2) ADDITIONAL SERVICES AT CERTAIN LOCA20 TIONS.—Section 2033(d) of such title is amended by 

21 striking ‘‘September 30, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep22 tember 30, 2018’’. 

23 (e) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE HOUS24 ING ASSISTANCE FOR HOMELESS VETERANS.—Section 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1759 IS

1 2041(c) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘September 

2 30, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2018’’. 

3 (f) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE FINAN4 CIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR VERY

5 LOW-INCOME VETERAN FAMILIES IN PERMANENT HOUS6 ING.—Section 2044(e)(1)(E) of such title is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘2017’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’. 

8 (g) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR GRANT PRO9 GRAM FOR HOMELESS VETERANS WITH SPECIAL

10 NEEDS.—Section 2061(d)(1) of such title is amended by 

11 striking ‘‘2017’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’. 

12 (h) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE ADVISORY

13 COMMITTEE ON HOMELESS VETERANS.—Section 2066(d) 

14 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2017’’ 

15 and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
#### IRVIN v. STATE.

No. 19822.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 26, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1938.

Percy Woodard, of Marshall, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; punishment is assessed at confinement. in the county jail for ninety days and a fine of $50.

Appellant’s only contention is that the evidence is insufficient to warrant and sustain his conviction.

*371The testimony of the state shows that Wilbur Williams arrived at Scottsville about noon on the 19th of October. He was on his way to Leigh in Harrison County. At Scottsville, he started walking. After he had gone some distance, he saw an automobile parked on the road with 'three men in it. He engaged them in conversation and made a trade.with them to carry him to Leigh. On the way he smelled liquor ancl noted that appellant, who was driving the car, would run it from one side of the road to the other. At an intersection of the road, he ran across a road and nearly struck a cow pen. A little later he ran into and against another car driven by Cecil George, knocking it into a ditch beside the road. Williams testified that appellant’s conduct and manner of driving indicated that he was drunk.

Appellant did not testify or offer any testimony to controvert that offered by the state.

We deem the evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s conclusion of appellant’s guilt.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
#### SHERMAN v. STATE.

No. 20574.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 6, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1940.

*485W. Joe Bryan and Fryer & Milstead, all of El Paso, for appellant.

Roy D. Jackson, Dist. Atty., and Harold S. Long, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of El Paso, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary 'for ten years.

This is a companion case, separately tried, to that of Jack Vaughn v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 134 S.W.2d 290 this day decided by the court. They were companions in the transaction. The questions of fact, as well as the questions of law, are identical. We, therefore, adopt our opinion in the Vaughn case as the opinion in this case.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for a rehearing, again insists that he was entitled to an instruction to the effect that if the injured party voluntarily and of his own free will delivered the money in question to the defendant with the intention of passing title as well as possession thereof, or if the jury had a reasonable doubt thereof, to acquit him. He was not entitled to such an instruction, because the money was obtained by means of a false pretext and the evidence did not raise the issue. The testimony, in our opinion, shows only that the injured party allowed the defendant to take the money with a condition subsequent attached- — -that they should later divide the entire proceeds. See Dix v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 296, 124 S.W.2d 998, where the authorities are collected. If this court, in cases like the one at bar, should hold that where property was obtained by false pretext, an accused would be entitled to such a charge as was here requested, it would virtually set at nought the statute relative to theft by false pretext.

Appellant next contends that the injured party, Tallman, was an accomplice to the offense of theft from himself of property over the value of $50. This certainly is not sound as a legal proposition.

All other matters complained of have already been discussed in the original opinion in Vaughn v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 134 S.W.2d 290, and we see no need of again discussing them.

The motion for a rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IA 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 65 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Election Commission with 

respect to travel on private aircraft for Federal candidates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mrs. HALVORSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Election 

Commission with respect to travel on private aircraft 

for Federal candidates. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Election Commission relating to campaign travel 

5 (published at 74 Federal Register 63951 (December 7, 

6 2009)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.


                                           /s/ Shmuel Gurfinkel
                                           --------------------
                                           Shmuel Gurfinkel
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           TRIMOL GROUP, INC.

                                           November 13, 2003


                                       14
Exhibit 99.2

                         PEOPLEVIEW, INC.

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of PeopleView, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James P. Stapleton, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and
(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.


/s/ James P. Stapleton
---------------------------------------
James P. Stapleton
Principal Financial Officer
August 7, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to PeopleView, Inc. and will be retained by
PeopleView and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.37

                          AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT

      WHEREAS, Waters Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and
EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. entered into a certain Rights Agreement, dated as
of August 9, 2002 (the "Rights Agreement"), under which EquiServe Trust Company,
N.A. was named the Rights Agent; and

      WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Sections 22 and 27 of the Rights
Agreement, the Company has given notice to EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. that
effective December 28, 2004 it is being removed as Rights Agent and The Bank of
New York, a New York trust company, is being appointed as the successor Rights
Agent under the Rights Agreement; and

      WHEREAS, the Bank of New York has expressed its willingness and desire to
serve as such appointed successor Rights Agent effective as of December 29, 2004
subject to the parties entering into this Amendment to Rights Agreement pursuant
to the provisions of Section 28 of the Rights Agreement;

      NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the Company and The Bank of
New York that the Rights Agreement shall be amended effective as of December 29,
2004 as follows:

      1.    The title page of the Rights Agreement shall be amended to replace
            the name of the party designated as EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
            with the name THE BANK OF NEW YORK.

      2.    The introductory paragraph of the Rights Agreement shall similarly
            be amended to have the name of the Rights Agent changed from
            EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. to The Bank of New York and to have
            The Bank of New York identified as a New York banking corporation.

      3.    Section 27 of the Rights Agreement shall be amended to replace the
            name and address of EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. with the
            following: The Bank of New York, 101 Barclay Street, New York, New
            York 10286 Attention: Stock Transfer.

      In all other respects the Rights Agreement shall remain unchanged and is
hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto.

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and The Bank of New York have caused this
Amendment to Rights Agreement to be duly executed and their respective corporate
seals to be hereunto affixed and attested, all as of this 4th day of
March 2005.

Attest:

By: /s/ Christine Briggs                    By: /s/ Robert J. Rinaudo
    -----------------------                     -------------------------
    Name: Christine Briggs                      Name: Robert J. Rinaudo
    Title: Assistant Vice President             Title: Assistant Vice President
    The Bank of New York                        The Bank of New York
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Titanium  Metals  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
we, J. Landis  Martin,  Chairman  of the Board,  President  and Chief  Executive
Officer of the  Company,  and Bruce P.  Inglis,  Vice  President  - Finance  and
Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
          operations of the Company




August 5, 2004


/s/ J. Landis Martin
--------------------
J. Landis Martin
Chairman of the Board, President
   and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Bruce P. Inglis
-------------------
Bruce P. Inglis
Vice President - Finance and Corporate Controller




Note:The  certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
     "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
     as  amended,  or  otherwise  subject to the  liabilities  of that  Section.
     Registration  Statements or other  documents  filed with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except
     as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.