alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMEDCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
EXHIBIT 11
Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                                                   June 30,                      June 30,
                                                          --------------------------    ---------------------------
                                                             1999           1998            1999           1998
                                                          -----------    -----------    -----------     -----------
<S>                                                    <C>              <C>           <C>             <C>
BASIC
     Weighted average shares outstanding                    20,532,275     17,322,667     20,786,647      15,068,166
     Contingently issuable shares in business
       combinations                                            335,055        518,454        376,613         715,507
                                                        --------------  -------------  -------------   -------------
     Number of common shares outstanding                    20,867,330     17,841,121     21,163,261      15,783,673
                                                        ==============  =============  =============   =============

DILUTED
     Weighted average shares outstanding                    20,532,275     17,322,667     20,786,647      15,068,166
     Contingently issuable shares in
         business combinations                                 335,055        518,454        376,613         715,507
     Net common shares issuable on exercise of
         certain stock options and warrants (1)              1,586,728      2,713,668      1,669,806       2,727,004
     Other dilutive securities                                 117,481          -            118,742           -
                                                        --------------  -------------  -------------   -------------
     Number of common shares outstanding                    22,571,539     20,554,789     22,951,808      18,510,677
                                                        ==============  =============  =============   =============
</TABLE>


(1) Net common shares issuable on exercise of certain stock options and warrants
is calculated based on the treasury stock method
IA 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 92 

Providing for the disapproval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 

for cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation 

pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2010 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. ROYCE) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the disapproval of the Congress of the proposed 

agreement for cooperation between the United States 

and the Russian Federation pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress does not favor the proposed agreement 

4 for cooperation transmitted to the Congress by the Presi5 dent on May 10, 2010. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1668 

To rename a waterway in the State of New York as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford 

Jr. Channel’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2017 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To rename a waterway in the State of New York as the 

‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Channel’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOSEPH SANFORD JR. CHANNEL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The waterway in the State of New 

5 York designated as the ‘‘Negro Bar Channel’’ shall be 

6 known and redesignated as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Chan7 nel’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the waterway referred to in subsection (a) shall 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1668 IS

1 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. 

2 Channel’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
23







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We have
issued our reports dated March 12, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements and schedules (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and
contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of new accounting
standards during 2007 and 2006) and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the Annual Report of Numerex Corp. on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
Numerex Corp on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-114842, effective November 23, 2004 and
File No. 333-122681, August 28, 2005) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-51780,
effective December 13, 2000 and File No. 333-105142, effective May 9,
2003).





/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP





Atlanta,
Georgia


March 12,
2008
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02254]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9024]

Notice of Public Meeting

    The Department of State will conduct an open meeting on Wednesday, 
March 4, 2015, at the headquarters of the Radio Technical Commission 
for Maritime Services (RTCM) in Suite 605, 1611 N. Kent Street, 
Arlington, Virginia 22209. The meeting will start at 9:30 a.m. The 
primary purpose of the meetings is to prepare for the second Session of 
the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Sub-Committee on 
Navigation, Communication, and Search and Rescue to be held at the IMO 
Headquarters, United Kingdom, from March 9, 2015 to March 13, 2015.
    The primary matters to be considered include:

--Routeing measures and mandatory ship reporting systems
--Recognition of Galileo as a component of the World-wide 
Radionavigation System (WWRNS)
--Updates to the Long-Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) system
--E-navigation strategy implementation plan
--Performance standards for multi-system shipborne navigation systems
--Analysis of developments in maritime radiocommunication systems and 
technology
--First outline of the detailed review of the Global Maritime Distress 
and Safety System (GMDSS)
--Further development of the GMDSS master plan on shore-based 
facilities
--Guidelines on MSI (maritime safety information) provisions
--Response to matters related to the Radiocommunication ITU R Study 
Group
--Response to matters related to ITU World Radiocommunication 
Conference
--Analysis of information on developments in Inmarsat and Cospas-Sarsat
--Guidelines on harmonized aeronautical and maritime search and rescue 
procedures, including SAR training matters
--Further development of the Global SAR Plan for the provision of 
maritime SAR services
--Procedures for routeing distress information in the GMDSS
--Amendments to the IAMSAR Manual
--Unified interpretation of provisions of IMO safety, security, and 
environment related Conventions
--Biennial agenda and provisional agenda for NCSR 3
--Report to the Maritime Safety Committee

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. To facilitate the building security process and 
to request reasonable accommodation, those who plan to attend should 
contact the meeting coordinator, Mr. George Detweiler, not later than 7 
days prior to the meeting. Mr. Detweiler may be contacted by email at 
George.H.Detweiler@uscg.mil, or by phone at (202) 372-1566. Requests 
made after that date might not be able to be accommodated. Additional 
information regarding these and other IMO public meetings may be found 
at: www.uscg.mil/imo.

    Dated: January 29, 2015.
Marc Zlomek,
Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-02254 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Dawit Belai, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 22, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Three witnesses for the employer testified that claimant admitted to them that on a number of occasions he sold books to students at an unauthorized discount and also at times gave books away free. These activities were not within claimant’s discretion and were done without permission or knowledge of claimant’s manager. Although claimant’s version of the facts differed, this created only a question of credibility for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve *(see, Matter of Picciotti [Roberts],*89 AD2d 1030). The admissions here provide ample basis for the conclusion that claimant’s employment was terminated due to misconduct *(see, Matter of McGlynn [Levine]*52 AD2d 709). Claimant’s remaining contentions concerning the hearing have been considered and found lacking in merit.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Notice is hereby given that, on August 23, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                    (“the Act”), OBI Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, American Management Systems, Fairfax, VA; GEIS (GE Information Systems), Gaithersburg, MD; and Trilogy Buying Chain, Austin, TX have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX; and Open Market, Burlington, MA have been dropped as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OBI Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On Saturday 10, 1997, OBI Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 1997 (62 FR 60531).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 27, 1999. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-3121  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                           |   |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | True      Product ID, Inc.                     |   |
|                          |                                           |   |
|                          | By:        /s/ Michael J. Antonoplos |   |
|        February 19, 2009 | Michael      J. AntonoplosPresident            |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ActiveCore  Technologies,
Inc. formerly IVP Technology  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ending  March  31,  2005 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of the  undersigned  herby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in his  capacity  as an officer of the
Company, that:

            1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:    June <>, 2005            By:      /s/ Peter J. Hamilton
                                           ---------------------
                                  Name:    Peter J. Hamilton
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ActiveCore Technologies,
Inc.  formerly IVP  Technology  Corporation  and will be retained by  ActiveCore
Technologies,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I am the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 ("Form 10-K").



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 2, 2007

By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts

R. Preston Pitts

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regan Holding Corp. and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*OPINION ISSUED JANUARY 29, 2008*

#### JOHN WAGNER and JEANINE WAGNER VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-07-172)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimants brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when their 2003 Pontiac Grand Am GT struck a hole while claimant Jeanine Wagner was traveling on Route 88 in West Liberty. Route 88 is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to make an award in this claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred on approximately March 31, 2007. Claimant is a student at West Liberty State College, and regularly takes Route 88 to travel to school. Route 88 is a road with a centerline and white edge lines. While claimant was driving from Wheeling to West Liberty on Route 88, her vehicle struck a large hole that was approximately a half mile from the College. Claimant stated that the hole was located near the golf course and occupied approximately half the lane of traffic. Claimant testified that she travels this road approximately twice a week, and she could not drive on this road without the vehicle striking at least one or two holes. During the *104incident in question, claimants’ vehicle sustained damage to three rims in the amount of $622.17. Claimant has been unable to repair these damages, but she has paid $37.95 to have her tires balanced. Since claimants’ insurance deductible is $500.00, their recovery in this claim is limited to that amount.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Route 88 at the site of claimants’ accident for the date in question. The respondent did not call any witnesses.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins vs. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645; 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman*vs. *Dept. of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had, at the least, constructive notice of the hole which claimants’ vehicle struck, and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public-. The Court finds that the road was covered with holes in the particular area in question. The size of the hole which claimants’ vehicle struck and the time of the year in which the incident occurred leads the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this hazardous condition, and respondent had an adequate amount of time to take corrective action. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent, and claimants may make a recovery for the damage to their vehicle.

In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimants in the amount of $500.00.

Award of $500.00.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 188 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of painting portraits 

of officers and employees of the Federal Government. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2017 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON, Mrs. MCCASKILL, and Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of painting 

portraits of officers and employees of the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating Govern5 ment-funded Oil-painting Act’’ or the ‘‘EGO Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PORTRAITS. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds appropriated or other8 wise made available to the Federal Government may be 

9 used to pay for the painting of a portrait of an officer 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 188 IS

1 or employee of the Federal Government, including the 

2 President, the Vice President, a Member of Congress, the 

3 head of an executive agency, or the head of an office of 

4 the legislative branch. 

5 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

6 (1) the term ‘‘executive agency’’ has the mean7 ing given the term in section 133 of title 41, United 

8 States Code; and 

9 (2) the term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ includes a 

10 Delegate or Resident Commissioner to Congress. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40303 c/w No. 16

- 40313 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSE DAVID BALDERAS

- BUENO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 623

- 1 USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 1052

- 1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose David Balderas

- Bueno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Balderas

- Bueno h a s not filed a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40303 Document: 00513804766 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 40303 c/w No. 16

- 40313

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal s present no nonfrivolous issue for a ppellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL S ARE DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40303 Document: 00513804766 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
**Exhibits
      No. 32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Photonix, Inc. (the “ Company ” )
      on Form
      10-K for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ” ),
      I,
      Richard D. Kurtz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June 29, 2007


________________________
              Richard
                Kurtz
              Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer