Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Notices 75307

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of First Amendment

to the Modification of the Work

Schedule Pursuant to the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act

In accordance with Departmental

policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that on November 14, 2000, a

proposed First Amendment to the

Modification of the Work Schedule

(‘‘Work Schedule Modification’’) in

United States and the State of New

Hampshire v. City of Dover, et al, Civil

Action No. 1:92–CV–406–M, was lodged

with the United States District Court for

the District of New Hampshire. This

Work Schedule Modification revises a

Consent Decree that was entered by the

Court in 1993 (‘‘1993 Consent Decree’’).

In the 1993 Consent Decree the

settling defendants agreed to implement

the Record of Decision (‘‘ROD’’) for the

Dover Municipal Landfill Superfund

Site (‘‘Site’’) in Dover, New Hampshire.

The ROD required the settling

defendants to construct a cap and pump

and treat the groundwater. The

proposed Work Schedule Modification

amends the 1993 Consent Decree by

extending the completion date of the

final Remedial Design and

commencement of the Remedial Action

until November 30, 2001. During this

additional time, the settling defendants

will complete a field study of a

bioremediation technology at the Site.

Continuing the bioremediation study

and delaying the commencement of the

cap allows the parties to continue

exploring a significantly less expensive

innovative technology while continuing

to protect the environment.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the Work

Schedule Modification. Comments

should be addressed to the Assistant

Attorney General for the Environment

and Natural Resources Division, P.O.

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,

Washington, D.C. 20044–7611, and

should refer to United States and the

State of New Hampshire v. City of

Dover, et al., DOJ Ref. #90–11–2–735.

The Work Schedule Modification may

be examined at the office of the United

States Attorney, District of New

Hampshire, U.S. Department of Justice,

55 Pleasant Street, Room 352, Concord,

New Hampshire, 03301–3904, and at

U.S. EPA New England (Region 1), 1

Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston,

Massachusetts, 02114. A copy of the

Work Schedule Modification may also

be obtained by mail from the Consent

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.

Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

20044–7611. In requesting a copy,

please enclose a check in the amount of

$6.00 (25 cents per page reproduction

cost) payable to the Consent Decree

Library.

Walker Smith,

Principal Deputy Chief, Environmental

Enforcement Section, Environmental and

Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00–30605 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Clean Water Act

In accordance with Departmental

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a consent decree in United

States v. Feinstein Family Partnership,

et al., Case No. 96–232–CIV–FTM–24D

(M.D. Fla.) was lodged with the United

States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida on November 17,

2000.

The proposed consent decree

concerns violations of the Clean Water

Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311, resulting from the

unauthorized discharge of dredged or

fill materials into waters of the United

States at the Colonial Properties site, a

development in Lee County, Florida.

The consent decree requires the

preservation of wetlands at the site and

the purchase of credits in a wetlands

mitigation bank.

The Department of Justice will receive

written comments relating to the

proposed consent decree for a period of

thirty (30) days from the date of

publication of this notice. Comments

should be addressed to the Assistant

Attorney General, Environment and

Natural Resources Division, United

States Department of Justice, Attention:

S. Randall Humm, Trial Attorney,

Environmental Defense Section, P.O.

Box 23986, Washington, DC 20026–

3986, and should refer to United States

of America v. Feinstein Family

Partnership, et al., DJ Reference No. 90–

5–1–6–626.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United

States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida, Room 2–194, United

States Courthouse and Federal Building,

2110 First Street, Fort Myers, FL 33901.

Letitia J. Grishaw,

Chief, Environmental Defense Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division,

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 00–30604 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Environment and Natural Resources

Division; Notice of Lodging Proposed

Consent Decree

In accordance with Department

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that a proposed consent decree in

United States v. Portrait Homes

Construction Co., Civil Action No. 4:00–

3581–12, (D.S.C.), was lodged with the

United States District Court for the

District of South Carolina on November

15, 2000. This proposed Consent Decree

concerns a complaint filed by the

United States against Portrait Homes

Construction Co., pursuant to sections

301(a) and 404 of the Clean Water Act,

33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and 1344 and imposes

civil penalties against the Defendant for

the unauthorized discharge of dredged

or fill material into waters of the United

States in connection with the

construction of a subdivision

development on a portion of Kaminski

Tract, located off Highway 707,

approximately 1.5 miles from the

intersection of Highway 17 and 707,

near Murrells Inlet, in Horry County,

South Carolina.

The proposed Consent Decree

requires the payment of civil penalties

in the amount of $10,000 and prohibits

the discharge of pollutants into the

waters of the United States.

The Department of Justice will accept

written comments relating to this

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)

days from the date of publication of this

notice. Please address comments to

Joseph P. Griffith, Jr., United States

Attorney’s Office, 170 Meeting Street,

Suite 300, P.O. Box 978, Charleston,

South Carolina 29402 and refer to

United States v. Portrait Homes

Construction Co.

The proposed Consent Decree may be

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United

States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, Hollings Judicial

75308 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Notices

Center, Meeting Street at Broad,

Charleston, S.C. 29401.

Joseph P. Griffith, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, United

States Attorneys Office, Charleston, South

Carolina.

[FR Doc. 00–30603 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water

Act

Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby

given that on November 13, 2000, a

proposed Consent Decree (‘‘the Decree’’)

in United States v. Russell Wilkey, Civil

Action No. 4:97 CV–239–M, was lodged

with the United States District Court for

the Western District of Kentucky.

The Defendent was the owner and

operator of four underground injection

wells located in Daviess County,

Kentucky. The Complaint filed by the

United States alleged that Defendent

violated the Safe Drinking Water Act

(‘‘the SDWA’’), an Administrative Order

on Consent (‘‘AOC’’) issued by the

United States Environmental Protection

Agency to Dependent under the SDWA,

and regulations contained in the

Underground Injection Control (‘‘UIC’’)

program for Kentucky in his operation

of those injection wells. The Decree will

resolve all of the United States’ claims

against the Dependent. Dependent has

agreed to pay the United States a civil

penalty of $20,000 for the violations.

Dependent has already plugged and

abandoned all of the injection wells.

The Department of Justice will receive

for a period of thirty (30) days from the

date of this publication comments

relating to the Decree. Comments should

be addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General, Environmental and Natural

Resources Division, U.S. Department of

Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C.

20044–7611, and should refer to United

States v. Russell Wilkey, DOJ No. 90–5–

1–1–4487.

The Decree may be examined at the

Office of the United States Attorney for

the Western District of Kentucky, 510

W. Broadway, 10th Fl., Louisville,

Kentucky, and also at the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4, Environmental Accountability

Division, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W.,

Atlanta, Georgia.

A copy of the Decree may also be

obtained by mail from the Consent

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.

Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

20044–7611. In requesting a copy of the

Decree, please enclose a check in the

amount of $3.25 (25 cents per page

reproduction cost), made payable to the

‘‘Consent Decree Library.’’

Walker B. Smith,

Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment & Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 00–30606 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[AAG/A Order No. 209–2000]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of

Records

Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5

U.S.C. 552a), notice is hereby given that

the Department of Justice proposes to

establish a new system of records to be

maintained by the 94 United States

Attorneys’ offices nationwide and the

Executive Office for United States

Attorneys (EOUSA) in Washington, D.C.

The United States Attorneys’ Office,

Giglio Information Files, JUSTICE/USA

018, is a new system of records for

which no public notice consistent with

the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(e)(4) and

(11) has been published. This system

has been established to enable the

United States Attorneys’ offices to

maintain and disclose records of

potential impeachment information

received from the Department’s

investigative agencies, in accordance

with the United States Supreme Court

case of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S.

150 (1972). It permits the United States

Attorneys’ offices to acquire, maintain,

and disclose for law enforcement

purposes, records obtained from federal

and state agencies’ personnel records

relating to impeachment information

that is material to the defense.

Title 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11)

provide that the public be given a 30-

day period in which to comment on the

proposed new system. The Office of

Management and Budget (OMB), which

has oversight responsibilities under the

Act, requires a 40-day period in which

to conclude its review of the system.

Therefore, please submit any comments

by January 2, 2001. The public, OMB,

and the Congress are invited to submit

written comments to Mary Cahill,

Management Analyst, Management and

Planning Staff, Justice Management

Division, Department of Justice,

Washington, D.C. 20530 (Room 1400,

National Place Building).

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r),

the Department has provided a report to

OMB and the Congress on the proposed

modification.

Dated: November 21, 2000.

Stephen R. Colgate,

Assistant Attorney General for

Administration.

JUSTICE/USA–018

SYSTEM NAME:

United States Attorney’s Office, Giglio

Information Files.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

Ninety-four United States Attorney’s

offices (see Appendix identified as

Justice/USA–999, last published 2–3–93

(58 FR 6983)) and offices posted on the

Internet web site of the Executive Office

for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) at

http://www.usdoj.gov/eousa; and the

EOUSA, U.S. Department of Justice, 950

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20530.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

Individuals who may serve as affiants

or testify as witnesses in criminal

proceedings brought by the ninety-four

United States Attorneys’ offices.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

This system contains potential

witness impeachment information

including records of disciplinary

actions. Records will include, but are

not limited to: (a) Specific instances of

witness conduct that may be used for

the purpose of attacking the witness’

credibility or character for truthfulness;

(b) evidence in the form of opinion as

to a witness’ character or reputation for

truthfulness; (c) prior inconsistent

statements; and (d) information that

may be used to suggest that a witness is

biased. The system may also contain

any judicial rulings, related pleadings,

correspondence, or memoranda

pertaining to the relevant criminal case.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

This system is established and

maintained under the authority of 5

U.S.C. 516 and 547.

PURPOSE OF THE SYSTEM:

This system has been established to

enable the Department of Justice’s

prosecuting offices to maintain and

disclose records of potential

impeachment information from the

Department’s investigative agencies, in

accordance with Giglio v. United States,

405 U.S. 150 (1972).

It permits the United States Attorneys’

offices to obtain information from

federal and state agencies and to

maintain and disclose for law

enforcement purposes records of

impeachment information that is

material to the defense of federal

criminal prosecutions.