alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Availability of Draft Director's Order Concerning 
National Park Service Policies and Procedures for Social Science

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) has prepared a Director's 
Order setting forth its policies and procedures related to social 
science. When adopted, the policies and procedures will apply to all 
units of the national park system.

DATES: Written comments will be accepted until January 15, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Draft Director's Order #78 is available on the Internet at 
http://www.nps.gov/refdesk/DOrders/index.htm. Requests for copies and 
written comments should be sent to Dr. Gary Machlis, NPS Visiting Chief 
Social Scientist, Social Science Program, National Park Service, 1849 C 
Street, NW (3127), Washington, DC 20240, or to his Internet address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfd8decdc6e0e0d2dedcd7d3d6ccffd1cfcc91d8d0c9">[email protected]</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Gary Machlis at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcbbbdaea58383b1bdbfb4b0b5af9cb2acaff2bbb3aa">[email protected]</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS is updating its current system of 
internal policies. When these documents contain new policy or 
procedural requirements that may affect parties outside the NPS, they 
are first made available for public review and comment before being 
adopted. This draft of Director's Order #78 covers social science 
topics such as permits, data collection and Paperwork Reduction Act 
compliance, ethical guidelines, and roles and responsibilities related 
to social science in the National Park Service.
    Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home 
address from the administrative record, which we will honor to the 
extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we 
would withhold from the record a respondent's identity, as allowable by 
law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must 
state this prominently at the beginning of your comment.

    Dated: November 27, 2000.
Michael Soukup,
Associate Director, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science.
[FR Doc. 00-30848 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4321-70-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

October 19, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00166-CV

IN RE INVUM THREE, LLC, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-25654

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 9, 2023, relator Invum Three, LLC filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Elaine 
2

H. Palmer, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of Harris County, to vacate 

the trial court’s January 17, 2023 amended temporary injunction.

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,086
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,539
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,001
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,650
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,661
<LOANS>                                        125,754
<ALLOWANCE>                                        590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,114
<DEPOSITS>                                     119,878
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,972
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 149,114
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,578
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  179
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   464
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,221
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,712
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,780
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,441
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      117
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,338
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,338
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       779
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.45
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       178
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   147
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,865
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   497
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       32
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  590
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               590
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of SoftLock.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





|                      |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   June 25, 2008 |  | /s/  Richard Schaefer                                         
|                      |  | Name:   Richard Schaefer                                      
|                      |  | Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                       American Radio Systems Corporation

                                   EXHIBIT 12

(In thousands, except ratio data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three              Three                 Nine               Nine
                                                                Months             Months               Months             Months
                                                                 Ended             Ended                Ended               Ended
                                                            September 30,      September 30,        September 30,      September 30,
                                                                 1996               1995                 1996                1995
                                                                 ----               ----                -----               -----
<S>                                                        <C>                <C>                 <C>                   <C>
Computation of Earnings:
Income from continuing operations before
    income taxes.........................................        2,459              2,469               $5,650             $12,769
Add:
Interest expense (1).....................................        6,254              3,086               15,217               8,971
Rent expense (2).........................................        1,239              1,027                2,668               1,268
                                                           -----------        -----------         ------------          ----------
Earnings as adjusted.....................................        9,952              6,582               23,535              23,008


Computation of Fixed Charges:
Interest expense (1).....................................        6,254              3,086               15,217               8,971
Rent expense (2).........................................        1,239              1,027                2,668               1,268
Preferred dividends......................................        2,433                                   2,567                 815
                                                           -----------        -----------         ------------          ----------
Fixed charges............................................        9,926              4,113               20,452              11,054

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges..........             1.00               1.60                 1.15                2.08



<FN>
----------------------------------------

(1)  Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.
(2)  Rent expense fixed charge is assumed to be 30% of gross operating rent charges.
</FN>
</TABLE>
# Euroopa Liidu C 489/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 489 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 59. köide30. detsember 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 489

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

59. köide30. detsember 2016

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2016/C 489/01 | Euro vahetuskurss | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2016/C 489/01

Euro vahetuskurss

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 30.12.2016 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 489/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2016

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 489/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

29. detsember 2016

(2016/C 489/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,0453 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 122,04 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4338 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,85300 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 9,5585 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,0714 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 9,0758 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria leev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 27,021 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 310,09 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,4141 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 4,5375 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 3,6926 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,4505 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,4154 |
| HKD | Hongkongi dollar | 8,1076 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,5040 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 1,5156 |
| KRW | Korea vonn | 1 264,25 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 14,2922 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 7,2706 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,5593 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 14 072,35 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,6876 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 51,912 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 63,2555 |
| THB | Tai baat | 37,568 |
| BRL | Brasiilia reaal | 3,4123 |
| MXN | Mehhiko peeso | 21,6329 |
| INR | India ruupia | 71,0950 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,0453

JPY

Jaapani jeen

122,04

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4338

GBP

Inglise nael

0,85300

SEK

Rootsi kroon

9,5585

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,0714

ISK

Islandi kroon

NOK

Norra kroon

9,0758

BGN

Bulgaaria leev

1,9558

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

27,021

HUF

Ungari forint

310,09

PLN

Poola zlott

4,4141

RON

Rumeenia leu

4,5375

TRY

Türgi liir

3,6926

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,4505

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,4154

HKD

Hongkongi dollar

8,1076

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,5040

SGD

Singapuri dollar

1,5156

KRW

Korea vonn

1 264,25

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

14,2922

CNY

Hiina jüaan

7,2706

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,5593

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

14 072,35

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,6876

PHP

Filipiini peeso

51,912

RUB

Vene rubla

63,2555

THB

Tai baat

37,568

BRL

Brasiilia reaal

3,4123

MXN

Mehhiko peeso

21,6329

INR

India ruupia

71,0950

---

(1)  Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated June 29, 2000, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on July 14, 2000, (65 FR 43785), Cambridge Isotope Lab, 50 Frontage Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleMethaqualone (2565)
IDimethyltryptamine (7435)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIPentobarbital (2270)
IISecobarbital (2315)
IIPhencyclidine (7471)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIBenzoylecgonine (9180)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms) (9273)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 
 
 The firm plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances to produce  isotope labeled standards for drug analysis. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Cambridge Isotope Lab to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Cambridge Isotope Lab on a regular basis to ensure that its continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, audits of the company's records, verification of the company's compliance with  state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted. Dated: November 20, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion  Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-30932 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) AND RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auxilio, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Joseph J. Flynn, Chief Executive Officer and Paul T. Anthony, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and






(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.






Date: August 13, 2010




By:
/s/ Joseph J. FlynnJoseph Flynn,

President and Chief Executive Officer





By:
/s/ Paul T. AnthonyPaul Anthony,

Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Spellman, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rose L. Rubin, J., at *Huntley*hearing, jury trial, and sentence), rendered November 22, 1983, convicting defendant of two counts of murder in the second degree, two counts of burglary in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the first degree, and one count of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to two indeterminate prison terms of from 15 years to life and five indeterminate prison terms of from 2 to 6 years, all to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

On November 10, 1982, the body of Jesse Petchers, whose skull had been cracked open, was discovered in his burglarized apartment at 33 Riverside Drive. Petchers had allowed defendant, defendant’s brother Robert, and defendant’s mother to live with him until a week or so before the murder. On November 11, 1982, defendant voluntarily went to the 20th Precinct where he eventually made both a written and video*319taped confession. The first two statements defendant made, which were exculpatory, contained inconsistencies which caused the police to believe defendant was lying. Detective Clark told defendant that he was lying, that he better tell the truth or he would be digging a deeper hole, and ripped up each statement. He emphasized the seriousness of the crime and told defendant that he thought he was "involved”. Furthermore, even though it was untrue, Clark told defendant that the police found his fingerprints on the fire hose nozzle. After an hour-and-45-minute lunch break, at approximately 4:20 p.m., *Miranda*warnings were administered to defendant and he made an inculpatory written statement. A videotape statement was taken shortly thereafter.

Although the facts suggest that prior to the *Miranda*warnings, defendant was subjected to police questioning which was accusatory in nature, we believe that under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person, innocent of any crime, would not conclude that he was in police custody *(People v Centano,*153 AD2d 494, *affd*76 NY2d 837). Furthermore, although the police used deceptive tactics and accused defendant of lying, the environment was not so coercive as to render defendant’s confession involuntary *(People v Tarsia,*50 NY2d 1). Furthermore, defendant was not entitled to suppression on the grounds that the interrogating police officers had an obligation to determine whether defendant was represented by counsel on two pending juvenile criminal matters. *(People v Bing,*76 NY2d 331.)

Finally, where the same prosecutor who took defendant’s videotape statement conducted the trial, the court acted within its discretion in denying defendant’s untimely requests during trial to redact the videotape statement and to require a different prosecutor to deliver summation argument *(People v Paperno,*54 NY2d 294). We would also note that defendant has failed to support his contention that the prosecutor’s opinions and beliefs were manifest on the videotape *(compare, People v Blake,*139 AD2d 110). Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5180 September Term, 2022

1:22-cv-00545-UNA

Filed On: December 16, 2022

David Earl Wattleton,

Appellant

v.

Federal Bureau of Prisons, John or Jane

Doe, Director,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Katsas, Walker, and Childs, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 22, 2022,

be affirmed. Appellant concedes that the district court correctly concluded that it lacked

jurisdiction insofar as the appellant seeks to challenge an order issued by this court. 

The district court also correctly concluded that appellant failed to state a claim against

the Director of the Bureau of Prisons upon which relief could be granted. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). In addition, to the extent appellant seeks a refund from this

court or rescission of a fee order issued by this court in 2003, that request is denied for

the same reason this court has denied appellant’s previous requests for similar relief. 

See Wattleton v. Dodrill, 589 F. App’x 540 (D.C. Cir. 2014); In re: Wattleton, No. 13-

5216, unpublished order (D.C. Cir. Sept. 27, 2013); In re: Wattleton, No. 13-5075,

unpublished order (D.C. Cir. June 19, 2013). Appellant failed to challenge the

previously assessed filing fee in the case where the fee was assessed, and he cannot

seek relief in this case. 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5180 September Term, 2022

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

Page 2