alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 JAMES BRYAN MENKE, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3
v. NO. 28,940 4 PHILIP C. GADDY, BERNARD FENENBOCK, 5 GLENNA GADDY, LANE GADDY, WESTON 6 GADDY, GADDY LAW FIRM, 7 Defendants-Appellees. 8
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 9 Richard J. Knowles, District Judge 10 James Bryan Menke 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 Pro Se Appellant 13 Philip C. Gaddy 14 Lane Gaddy 15 Weston Gaddy 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 Bernard Fenenbock 18 El Paso, TX 19 Pro Se Appellees 20

MEMORANDUM OPINION 212 CASTILLO, Judge. 1 Appellant, pro se, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 2 complaint. This Court’s first notice proposed summary affirmance on the basis that 3 Appellant failed to include the information necessary to determine the issues raised. 4 Appellant filed a memorandum in oppositi on to the proposed disposition. Because 5 Appellant has not provided the information requested by this Court, we affirm the 6 district court’s order. 7 The first notice of proposed dispositi on expressly requested that Appellant 8 inform this Court of the exact claims brought in the prior litigation, who brought them, 9 in what capacity they werebrought, against whom they were brought, and whether 10 they were resolved. Appellant needed only to name the specific claims brought in the 11 prior litigation and show that those claims were not resolved or that they were 12 different from the claims asserted in this case. The memorandum in opposition asserts 13 that the information requested by this C ourt is contained in the record proper. 14 However, many of the exhibits and documen ts referred to in the motions were not 15 made a part of the record. Neverthele ss, even absent those documents, Appellant 16 could have met his burden by providing the specific information requested. See State 17 v. Calanche , 91 N.M. 390, 392, 574 P.2d 1018, 1020 (Ct. App. 1978) (stating that 18 factual recitations in the docketing statement are accepted as true unless the record on 193 appeal shows otherwise). 1 We presume that the district court is correct. Farmers, Inc. v. Dal Mach. & 2 Fabricating, Inc. , 111 N.M. 6, 8, 800 P.2d 1063, 1065 ( 1990). Therefore, the burden 3 is on Appellant to clearly demonstrate that the district court erred. Id. The docketing 4 statement failed to set out all the relevant facts, and the memorandum in opposition 5 failed to remedy this deficiency, desp ite this Court’s specific request. See Thornton 6 v. Gamble , 101 N.M. 764, 769, 688 P.2d 1268, 1273 (Ct. App. 1984) (requiring 7 counsel to set out all the relevant facts inthe docketing statemen t ). Therefore, we 8 conclude that Appellant has not met his burde n of showing that the district court erred 9 in dismissing the complaint. 10 For these reasons and those stated in th e first notice, we affirm the district 11 court’s order. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13

________________________________ 14 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 15

WE CONCUR: 164 ________________________________ 1 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 2

________________________________ 3 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 4
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1787 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 691
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1787

       To reauthorize the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2017

Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. King, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Udall, and Mr. 
  Alexander) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                           November 29, 2018

              Reported by Ms. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reauthorize the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Geologic Mapping Act 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING ACT OF 1992.

    (a) Reauthorization.--
            (1) In general.--Section 9(a) of the National Geologic 
        Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31h(a)) is amended by striking 
        ``2018'' and inserting ``2023''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 4(b)(1) of the National 
        Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31c(b)(1)) is amended 
        by striking ``Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009'' each 
        place it appears in subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting 
        ``National Geologic Mapping Act Reauthorization Act''.
    (b) Geologic Mapping Advisory Committee.--Section 5(a)(3) of the 
National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31d(a)(3)) is amended 
by striking ``Associate Director for Geology'' and inserting 
``Associate Director for Core Science Systems''.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--Section 3 of the National Geologic 
Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``section 6(d)(3)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(3)'';
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking ``section 6(d)(1)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(1)''; and
            (3) in paragraph (9), by striking ``section 6(d)(2)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(2)''.
                                                       Calendar No. 691

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1787

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

       To reauthorize the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 29, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
exhibit101.htm


    
      

      

    

    
      EXHIBIT
10.1

    

    

      CLECO
CORPORATION

      ANNUAL
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

      Amendment

      (Code
Section 409A Compliance)

      


      Whereas, Cleco Corporation, a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana (the
“Company”), maintains the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, which plan was
most recently amended and restated as of January 23, 2003 (the
“Plan”);

      


      Whereas, such Plan may be
deemed to constitute “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations
promulgated thereunder and must now be amended to comply with the provisions
thereof and to provide for the return of certain awards made
thereunder;

      


      Now, Therefore, effective as
of January 1, 2009, Section 12 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its
entirety as follows:

      


      “12.   Timing of
Payment.  Any Payout hereunder shall be paid as of March 15th
of the calendar year immediately following the Plan Year.”

      


      This Amendment was approved by
the Company’s Board of Directors on October 31, 2008, to be effective as of the
date or dates set forth herein.

      


      


      
        	
                Cleco
      Corporation

              
	 
      
	
                By:          /s/ G. W.
      Bausewine           

              
	 
      
	
                Its:           S.V.P., Corporate
      Services

              
	 
      
	
                Date:       November 4,
      2008
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1976 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1976

To allow all individuals purchasing health insurance in the individual 
       market the option to purchase a lower premium copper plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2017

   Mr. Scott (for himself, Mr. Carper, Mr. Cassidy, and Mr. Warner) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow all individuals purchasing health insurance in the individual 
       market the option to purchase a lower premium copper plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing Access to Care Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING ALL INDIVIDUALS PURCHASING HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE 
              INDIVIDUAL MARKET THE OPTION TO PURCHASE A LOWER PREMIUM 
              COPPER PLAN.

    (a) In General.--Section 1302(e) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) of 
                subparagraph (B) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), 
                respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly;
                    (B) by striking ``plan year if--'' and all that 
                follows through ``the plan provides--'' and inserting 
                ``plan year if the plan provides--''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by 
                striking ``clause (ii)'' and inserting ``subparagraph 
                (B)'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).
    (b) Risk Pools.--Section 1312(c)(1) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(c)(1)) is amended by inserting 
``and including enrollees in catastrophic plans described in section 
1302(e)'' after ``Exchange''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1312(d)(3)(C) of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(d)(3)(C)) is 
amended by striking ``, except that in the case of a catastrophic plan 
described in section 1302(e), a qualified individual may enroll in the 
plan only if the individual is eligible to enroll in the plan under 
section 1302(e)(2)''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Frontstep, B.V. (formerly Symix Systems, B.V.)
Frontstep (Canada), Inc. (formerly Symix Computer Systems (Canada) Inc.)
Frontstep distribution.com, inc. (formerly e-mongoose, inc.)


Frontstep (Europe) Limited
Frontstep, GmbH (formerly Symix Systems, GmbH)
Frontstep (Hong Kong) Limited (formerly Symix Computer Systems
 (Hong Kong) Limited)
Frontstep, Limited (formerly Symix New Zealand, Limited)
Frontstep (Malaysia) Sdn., Bhd. (formerly Symix Computer Systems
 (Malaysia) Sdn., Bhd.)
Frontstep Pty. Ltd. (formerly Symix Computer Systems (Australia) Pty. Ltd.)
Frontstep (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (formerly Symix Computer Systems
 (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.)
Frontstep Solutions Group, Inc. (formerly Symix Computer Systems, Inc.)
Frontstep (Thailand) Ltd.
Symix Computer Systems (Mexico) S. De R.L. De C.V.
Frontstep (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (formerly Symix Computer Systems
 (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.)
Symix Computer Systems (UK) Ltd.
Symix France, SA
Frontstep Italia S.r.l. (formerly Symix Italia, S.r.l.)
Symix Japan Ltd.
Frontstep (UK) Ltd. (formerly Symix (U.K.) Ltd.)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1859 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1859

    To extend the moratorium on the annual fee on health insurance 
                               providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2017

  Mr. Gardner (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
Portman, Mr. Flake, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Heller, and 
  Mr. Scott) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the moratorium on the annual fee on health insurance 
                               providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthcare Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON ANNUAL FEE ON HEALTH INSURANCE 
              PROVIDERS.

    Subsection (j)(2) of section 9010 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act is amended by striking ``December 31, 2017'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2018''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Supply, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

November 18, 2003


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Supply, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

November 18, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Quarterly Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
November 12, 2009

By:

/s/ DAVID I. MATSON David I. Matson Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Financial Officer)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2006 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated: August 9, 2006
    
    By:
    /s/ Gary W. QualmannPrinted Name: Gary W. QualmannTitle: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurerand Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3486 ]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Correggio and Parmigianino: Master Draftsmen of the 
Renaissance''

Department: United States Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Correggio and Parmigianino: 
Master Draftsmen of the Renaissance,'' imported from abroad for the 
temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art in 
New York from on or about February 5, 2001 to on or about May 6, 2001, 
is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-5997). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-30557 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
##### 



Purpose
 . Administration
   The Shares




---



##### 



Participation
  Options
 Grant of Options
 Incentive Stock Options
 Option Price
 2




---



##### 



Option Term
 Exercisability
 Method of Exercise
 Acceleration or Extension of Exercise Time
 Termination of Employment
 Death, Disability, or Retirement of a Participant
  3




---



##### 



Performance Awards
 Grant of Performance Awards
 Performance Targets
 Earned Performance Awards
 Payment of Earned Performance Awards
 Termination of Employment
 Disability, Death, or Retirement
 4




---



##### 



Pro-Rata Payment
 Other Events
 Code Section 409A
 Other Stock-Based Awards
 Grant of Other Awards
 Terms of Other Awards
     5




---



##### 



Annual Retainer
 Payment of Annual Retainer
 Deferral of Payment of Annual Retainer
    Terms Applicable to All Awards Granted under the Plan
 Effect of Change in Control
   6




---



##### 



Limitations
    Plan Provisions Control Award Terms
 Limitations on Transfer
 Taxes
 Awards Not Includable for Benefit Purposes
 7




---



##### 



Compliance with Rule 16b-3 and Section 162(m)
   Amendment and Termination
   8




---



##### 



Changes in Wilmington Trusts Capital Structure
      9




---



##### 



Period of Approval and Term of Plan
  Compliance with Law and Approval of Regulatory Bodies
  No Right of Employment
 Use of Proceeds
 Severability
 Construction of the Plan
 10




---



##### 



Interpretation of the Plan
 No Strict Construction
 Costs and Expenses
 Unfunded Plan
 Surrender of Awards
 Definitions
        11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



14