alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-15-00001-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT AMARILLO, TEXAS

BRENTLEY WAYNE HRNCIRIK §

§

Appellant §

§

v § TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-509,724

§

§

§

BOBBYE GAIL HRNCIRIK §

§

Appellee §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, BRENTLEY WAYNE HRNCII{IK, appellant, and files this

Motion for Extension of Time to file Appellant’s Brief, pursuant to TRAP 38.6(d) and

would show the court as follows:

I

The deadline for filing Appellant’s Brief is March 9, 2015.

II.

No previous extension have been granted. Appellant’s attorney would request a

30 day extension to April 9, 2015. The reason Appellant needs an extension is due to the

fact that on February 23, 2015, Appellant’s attorney was notified he was set number one

for jury trial in Cause No. 2015-405,167, styled the State of Texas v. Valentino Casares,

in the ]40uhj District Court ofLubbock County, Texas, this is a re-indictment of Cause No.

2014-401,509, which had previously been set for jury trial November 3, 2014. Due to

preparation for this jury trial a necessity exists for an extension to file Appellant’s Brief.

ifi.

Appellant’s attorney is a sole- practitioner and has been diligent in his efforts to

appropriately research and prepare Appellant’s Brief.

ACCEPTED

2013-509,724

SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS

3/5/2015 3:03:38 PM

Vivian Long, Clerk

 FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 3/5/2015 3:03:38 PM VIVIAN LONG CLERK
IV.

Appellant would show the Court that the actions taken by his attorney are taken

in a good faith effort to promptly pursue appellant’s appeal and not for purposes of delay,

and the appellee would not be harmed or prejudiced by the granting of this Motion for

Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant prays that the Court grant

Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF DAVID MARTINEZ

1663 Broadway

Lubbock, TX 79401

Telephone (806) 744-1692

Telecopier (806) 744-5660

dmtzlaw@aol.com

By: /WVcwtd’Mcurttne-3’

David Martinez

State Bar No. 13141650

Attorney for Appellant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Motion

for Extension of Time to file Appellant’s Brief was emailed to Ms. Bobbye Gail Hrncirik

at Bobbye.hrncirik@umchealthsystem.com

/s/Vwtd’Alailtnq’

David Martinez

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

This is to certify that on this 5th day of March, 2015 I tried contacting Ms.

Hrncirik and she was not available, a voice mail message was left to Ms. Hrncirik

regarding any objection to our filing of our motion for extension.

/s/DcwCdi Mcwttna

David Martinez

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to TRAP 9.4 (i) (3), undersigned Counsel certifies that this Motion for

Extension of Time to File Motion Appellant’s Brief was prepared with Microsoft Office

2010, and that according to the program’s word- count, the sections covered by TRAP

9.1 (i) (3) contains 468 words.

,YVcwCd’ Ma-rttnez

David Martinez
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/21 F

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1
  ) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 6021 Feabhra 2017 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1
  )

*1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

6021 Feabhra 2017

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | An Chomhairle |
| | Fad a chur le tréimhse bhailíochta na ngearrliostaí | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

An Chomhairle

Fad a chur le tréimhse bhailíochta na ngearrliostaí

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (*1)   Faoin tagairt C 54 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(*1)   Faoin tagairt C 54 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

*1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

An Chomhairle

| 21.2.2017 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

Fad a chur le tréimhse bhailíochta na ngearrliostaí

Le cinneadh ó Leas-Ardrúnaí Chomhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh, cuirtear fad le bailíocht na ngearrliostaí a bunaíodh tar éis na gcomórtas ginearálta a liostaítear thíos go dtí an 31 Nollaig 2019:

| CONS/AD/430


  (dhá phróifíl) | eagraithe chun painéal de riarthóirí sinsearacha a bhunú i réimse an Bheartais Eorpaigh Slándála agus Cosanta (BESC). Dhá phróifíl ag grád AD 9 a bhí sa chomórtas (próifíl 1: pleanálaithe straitéiseacha sinsearacha d’oibríochtaí agus de mhisin i mbainistiú géarchéimeanna; próifíl 2: pleanálaithe sinsearacha chun cumais mhíleata/shibhialta/spáis a fhorbairt), a fógraíodh in
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 178 A an 15 Iúil 2008. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | chun painéal de chinn aonaid ag grád AD 12 a bhunú i réimse an aistriúcháin, agus an Ghaeilge acu mar phríomhtheanga, a fógraíodh in
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 99 A an 30 Aibreán 2009. |

CONS/AD/430

(dhá phróifíl)

eagraithe chun painéal de riarthóirí sinsearacha a bhunú i réimse an Bheartais Eorpaigh Slándála agus Cosanta (BESC). Dhá phróifíl ag grád AD 9 a bhí sa chomórtas (próifíl 1: pleanálaithe straitéiseacha sinsearacha d’oibríochtaí agus de mhisin i mbainistiú géarchéimeanna; próifíl 2: pleanálaithe sinsearacha chun cumais mhíleata/shibhialta/spáis a fhorbairt), a fógraíodh in
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 178 A an 15 Iúil 2008.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

chun painéal de chinn aonaid ag grád AD 12 a bhunú i réimse an aistriúcháin, agus an Ghaeilge acu mar phríomhtheanga, a fógraíodh in
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 99 A an 30 Aibreán 2009.

---
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 173 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP code for particular communities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2017 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. NELSON) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate 

a single, unique ZIP code for particular communities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZIP CODES. 

4 Not later than September 30, 2017, the United 

5 States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP 

6 code for, as nearly as practicable, each of the following 

7 communities: 

8 (1) Ocoee, Florida. 

9 (2) Miami Lakes, Florida. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1228 

To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force or effect, and 

to prohibit the use of funds for certain purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. HELLER, Mr. COBLE, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. KING of 

Iowa, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. AKIN, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, and Mr. 

TAYLOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force 

or effect, and to prohibit the use of funds for certain 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE 

4 ORDER. 

5 Executive Order 13166, ‘‘Improving Access to Serv6 ices for Persons with Limited English Proficiency’’ (Au7 gust 16, 2000; 65 Fed. Reg. 50121), is null and void and 

8 shall have no force or effect. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1228 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS FOR CER2 TAIN PURPOSES. 

3 No funds appropriated pursuant to any provision of 

4 law may be used to promulgate or enforce any executive 

5 order that creates an entitlement to services provided in 

6 any language other than English. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

COREY RODRIGUES § 

§ 

Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-cv-00607-P 

 § 

TARRANT COUNTY [specifically] § 

THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE OF § 

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, § 

and REGINALD LOWE, and § 

DAKOTA WAYNE COSTON, and § 

LEWIS ANTHONY VELASQUEZ § 

§ 

Defendants. § 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: 

NOW COME Plaintiff Corey Rodrigues, Defendant Tarrant County (also referred 

to by Plaintiff as the Sheriff’s Office of Tarrant County, Texas), and Defendant Reginald 

Lowe, who by and through their undersigned counsel of record, enter into this joint 

stipulation. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the 

terms of the parties’ settlement agreement, the matters in issue in the above-entitled 

action have been resolved. Plaintiff Corey Rodrigues, Defendant Tarrant County, and 

Defendant Reginald Lowe hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that this action (including 

any and all claims that have been or could have been alleged by Plaintiff in the abovereferenced action against Tarrant County, Texas, and any of its former, current or future 

elected or appointed officials, employees, representatives, agents, and contractors (such 

as medical or mental health care providers); Reginald Roy Lowe Sr.; Lewis Anthony 

Case 4:22-cv-00607-P Document 47 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 350
Case 4:22-cv-00607-P Document 47 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 351
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby asserts that no service is necessary due to the foregoing being 

jointly prepared and filed. However, by virtue of filing this document, a copy is being 

electronically served on all counsel of record. 

/s/ M. Keith Ogle 

M.KEITH OGLE

Case 4:22-cv-00607-P Document 47 Filed 01/25/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 352
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11477 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

URIEL MENDOZA SANDOVAL ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 235

- 1

Before DENNIS, OWEN, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Uriel Mendoza
Sandoval has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza Sandoval h a s not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 6, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11477 Document: 00515066117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2019No. 18

- 11477

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fur ther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-11477 Document: 00515066117 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2019
Circuit Court for Prince George’s County

Case No. CT06

- 1010X

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

No. 48

September Term, 201 8

JAFET L. HERNANDEZ

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND

Barbera, C.J.

Greene

Adkins

McDonald

Watts

Hotten

Getty

,

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: October 17, 2018JAFET L . HERNANDEZ * IN THE

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* No. 48

STATE OF MARYLAND * September Term, 201 8



### PER CURIAM ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the

above

- entitled case, it is this 17th day of October , 201 8

,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that, a majority of the Court

concurring, the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals is vacated and the case is

remanded to that court with directions to affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for

Prince George’s County for the reasons set forth in the opinion in James E. Bowie v. State

of Maryland , No. 55, September Term, 2017 (August 29, 2018) . Costs to be paid by

Petitioner.

/s/ Clayton Greene, Jr.

Senior Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Ingles, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered on September 17, 1987, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 Vi to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                                1
<CURRENCY>                       U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                             18,472,624
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                      37,273,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   75,363,402
<PP&E>                             20,089,186
<DEPRECIATION>                      6,314,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    227,213,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              36,791,383
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                              206,339
<OTHER-SE>                        164,918,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      227,213,107
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  134,241,608
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     125,110,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    301,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     8,829,201
<INCOME-TAX>                        3,355,096
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 5,474,105
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        5,474,105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.30
        


</TABLE>
CITY OF DUBOIS, PENNSYLVANIA 

16 W. SCRIBNERAVE. P.O. BOX 408 • DUBOIS, PENNSYLVANIA 15801 

TELEPHONE: (814) 371-2000, Ext. 135 

FAX: (814) 371-1290 

Office of the City IVlanager 

Department of Administration & Finance 

July 26, 2010 

Mr c;5 . Dennis DeVaney 

Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

a"' Floor West 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: DuBois Regional Airport (DUJ) 

Dear iVIr. DeVaney, 

The DuBois Regional Airport is a major selling point to attract corporations who are considering investing in the local 

area. Mr. Shaffer forwarded a copy of the Essential Air Service Gulfstream International Airlines Proposal to my office 

and after careful review I feel that Option One, wrapping Franklin (FKL) service with DUJ for four weekday roundtrips for 

DUJ, is the best solution for our local area. 

Currently we are dealing with many outside corporations in negotiations for future business. The easy access to an 

airline has made face to face meeting much easier. We are extremely happy with the excellent service we have 

received from Gulfstream and the DuBois Regional Airport and look forward to continuing this relationship. 

I support and would ask that you consider awarding Option One as proposed by Gulfstream for their next two-year 

contract with the DuBois Regional Airport. 

Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter I can be reached at 814-371-2000. 

Sincerely, 

' I 

Gary D. Gilbert 

Mayor 

GG/bjs
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:See Attachment
132 Tex. 122

#### Grace Marr ANDERSON, Adm’x, et al. v. O. R. ARMSTRONG et al.

No. 2164—7092.

Commission of Appeals of Texas. Section A.

Jan. 4, 1939.

Richard F. Burges and Walter S. Howe, both of El Paso, for plaintiffs in error.

McBroom & Clayton and Leo Jaffe, all of El Paso, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, having, in response to order of this Court heretofore entered, filed bond in accordance with the statute in such cases made and provided, we have again carefully reviewed and considered this case, in the light of the motions for rehearing filed herein, and are of the opinion that the conclusions reached herein, as shown by the opinion on file, is correct, and all motions for rehearing are overruled.
exv10w6w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.6.2




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC. 1989

EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN




          WHEREAS, PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC. (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC.
1989 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN; and



          WHEREAS, the stated plan has been restated and amended as of June 27, 1996 (such restated and
amended plan herein the “Plan”); and



          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan’s definition of “Subsidiary” contained in
Section 2(l) to include within such definition wholly owned non-corporate business trust(s) of the
Company;



          NOW, THEREFORE pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan, effective October 1, 1996, the Plan is
amended as follows:




	 	1.  	Section 2(l) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:






“Subsidiary” means a subsidiary corporation of the Company as defined in Section
424(f) of the Code and/or any business trust owned either directly or indirectly by
the Company.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the stated
effective date.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC.,

	 	 	 	 	a Delaware corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	By:	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	E. Mitchell Weatherly
	

	 	 	 	 	 	Senior Vice President
# Službeni list C 39A/7. v

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 39A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 60.7. veljače 2017. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 39A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 60.7. veljače 2017.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V.   Objave |
| | ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI |
| | Europska komisija |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | Ured Zajednice za biljne sorte — Poziv na iskaz interesa za imenovanje predsjednika žalbenog vijeća (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

V.   Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europska komisija

2017/C 39 A/01

Ured Zajednice za biljne sorte — Poziv na iskaz interesa za imenovanje predsjednika žalbenog vijeća (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

V. Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europska komisija

| 7.2.2017 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 39/1

---

URED ZAJEDNICE ZA BILJNE SORTE

Poziv na iskaz interesa za imenovanje predsjednika žalbenog vijeća

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

Ured Zajednice za biljne sorte raspisuje natječaj za radno mjesto predsjednika žalbenog vijeća.

Kandidati moraju biti državljani jedne od država članica Europske unije.

Vijeće imenuje predsjednika s popisa kandidata koje je predložila Komisija nakon što je dobila mišljenje Upravnog vijeća Ureda. Za informacije o primicima možete se obratiti tajništvu žalbenog vijeća (Community Plant Variety Office, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). Ured Zajednice za biljne sorte i Komisija primjenjuju politiku jednakih mogućnosti.

Cijeli tekst poziva na iskaz interesa i poveznica na elektronički obrazac za prijavu dostupni su na: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

Prijave se zaprimaju najkasnije do 8. ožujka 2017. (vidjeti detalje u uputama o prijavi).

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ISMAEL VIRUET ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 1606 LT Case No. 2020

- SC

- 037729

- O

GOODYEAR SERVIC E CENTER,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed June 14, 2022 Appeal from the County Court f or Orange County, Elizabeth Starr, Judge. Ismael Viruet, Orlando, pro se. Tiffany M. Ward an d Scott A. Richman, of McDon ald Toole Wiggins, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

WALLIS , EISNAUGLE and WOZNIAK , JJ., conc ur.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10(h)

                             SUMMARY OF BONUS PLAN

     The executive officers named in the Symix Systems, Inc. ("Symix" or the 
"Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 
and other management employees of Symix ("Participants") participate in 
compensation plans based upon the performance of Symix.  Annual target 
bonuses are established by the Symix Compensation Committee for executive 
officers and by executive officers for all other Participants.  Total 
targeted compensation is determined based on average compensation (base 
compensation plus bonus) levels for the industry.  Under the Company's fiscal 
year 1998 plan (the "Plan"), a Participant can earn a bonus based upon the 
performance of Symix as reflected by Symix's earnings per share and revenue 
achievements in relation to its targeted performance.  Bonuses for revenue 
achievement are paid quarterly based upon year-to-date performance.  
Quarterly eligible components are pro -rated against targeted annual 
objectives.  Bonuses are based on formulas which provide larger bonuses for 
higher earnings per share and/or revenue achievement. The revenues for a 
quarter and the annual earnings per share must be at least ninety percent 
(90%) of target before any bonuses are earned.  Variable components of the 
compensation plan are self-correcting to reflect over or under achievement on 
a quarterly bonus.  A maximum of 200% of the targeted bonus based on earnings 
per share and revenue objectives is payable under the compensation plans in 
the event actual performance of the Company exceeds 150% of targeted 
performance.  In addition, individual bonus plans may contain other variable 
components related to management objectives, operating margins, and market or 
geographic revenue targets.  The Company's Chief Executive Officer is not a 
participant in the Plan.





                                      54