alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with  the Annual Report  on Form 10-K  of Sport Supply  Group,
 Inc., (the  "Company") for  the fiscal year ended  March 28, 2003, as  filed
 with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
 "Report"), I, Geoffrey P.  Jurick, Chief Executive  Officer of the  Company,
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1) The Report  fully complies  with the  requirements of  Section 13(a)  or
 Section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


 Date: July 11, 2003
                                    By: /s/ Geoffrey P. Jurick
                                    --------------------------
                                    Geoffrey P. Jurick
                                    Chief Executive Officer



 This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of  the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
 provided  to Sport Supply Group, Inc. and will be retained by Sport Supply
 Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
 staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of ESB Financial Corporation (the Registrant)
hereby certifies that the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Charles P. EvanoskiCharles P. EvanoskiGroup Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


Date: March 12, 2007



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ESB Financial Corporation and will be retained by ESB Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### THOMAS v. STATE.

No. 20682.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1939.

D. F. Sanders and John A. Veillon, both of Beaumont, for appellant.

.Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty.,' of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky in a container to which *301no tax stamp showing the payment of the tax due to the State of Texas was affixed; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The chief witness in the case who purchased the liquor in question was an Inspector for the Texas Liquor Control Board.

The record before us presents but one question which it is necessary for us to consider. Complaint is made that, under the facts of this case, the witness was an accomplice and that appellant could not he convicted on his uncorroborated testimony. This question has been before this court recently in several cases. It has been thoroughly considered and decided adversely to the contention of the appellant. See Stevens v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 333, 110 S.W.2d 906, and cases there cited; also Carpenter v. State, Tex.Cr.App.,-S.W.2d -1 (not yet reported). Art. 666—23a, subdivision (8), Vernon’s Ann.P.C.

No reversible error being shown in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

1

 Not released by court at date of publication.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99

[LOGO]

                 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






To the Board of Directors of
Associates First Capital Corporation and
The First National Bank of Chicago as Trustee:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated balance sheet of Associates First Capital Corporation as of
December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended,
have issued our report thereon dated January 20, 1998.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to
believe that there were any exceptions or errors in the records relating to
receivables serviced for others by Fleetwood Credit Corp. ("Fleetwood) as
Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 1997,
among Fleetwood, as Servicer, Fleetwood Credit Receivables Corp., as Seller, and
The First National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee, and the Fleetwood Credit Grantor
Trust Standard Terms and Conditions of Agreement (Senior/Subordinated) effective
March 1, 1997, incorporated by reference therein (collectively,
the "Agreement"),insofar as such exceptions or errors related to accounting
matters.  However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining
knowledge of such exceptions or errors.

We are independent with respect to the Associates First Capital Corporation and
Fleetwood under Rule 101 of the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct and its
interpretations.

This report, issued pursuant to Section 13.11 of the Agreement, is intended
solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors and management of
Associates First Capital Corporation and The First National Bank of Chicago and
should not be used for any other purpose.




Dallas, Texas
January 20, 1998


                        /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00331-CR

No. 10-18-00332-CR

LARRY RAMON LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D38134-CR and D38192-CR

ABATEMENT ORDER

The appellant’s brief is overdue in this appeal. The Clerk of the Court’s February 

14, 2019 letters to appellant’s counsel state:

Our records indicate that the appellant’s brief was due on or before 

February 4, 2019. To date, no brief has been filed. 

You will notice that the trial court has been copied with this letter as 

required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). 

Presumably, the purpose of notifying the trial court is to allow intervention 

by the trial court before the Court has to formally abate the proceeding for 

a hearing.
Lopez v. State Page 2

Unless a brief or satisfactory response is received within 14 days, this 

Court must abate the appeal and order the trial court to immediately 

conduct a hearing pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b) (2) & (3).

Because appellant’s brief was not filed within 14 days, we abate this appeal to the 

trial court to conduct any necessary hearings within 21 days of the date of this order in 

accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.8(b)(2), (3).

The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records required by the rule, if any, are 

ordered to be filed within 35 days of the date of this Order. See id.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed March 20, 2019

Do not publish
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

t0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148391

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148391

COA: 317920

Wayne CC: 12

- 003606

- FH

LOVE L. MORRISSETTE, III,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
*OPINION ISSUED OCTOBER 29, 2007*

#### LUCY RUTHERFORD VS. DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES

(CC-07-251)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks to recover $90.00 in towing expenses which she was charged when her grandson’s 1989 Honda was improperly towed due to respondent’s failure to update the renewal notice for the vehicle. Since the registration and license plate number did not match, the Ceredo Police towed the vehicle.

In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim as well as the amount, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in that appropriate fiscal year from which the invoice could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to claimant in the amount of $90.00.

Award of $90.00.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Indian Gaming Commission

# AGENCY:

National Indian Gaming Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that the National Indian Gaming Commission has adopted final annual fee rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.09% (.0009) for tier 2 for calendar year 2000. These rates shall apply to all assessable gross revenues from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction of the Commission.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bobby Gordon, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; telephone 202/632-7003; fax 202/632-7066 (these are not toll-free numbers).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act established the National Indian Gaming Commission which is charged with, among other things, regulating gaming on Indian lands.

The regulations of the Commission (25 CFR part 514), as amended, provide for a system of fee assessment and payment that is self-administered by gaming operations. Pursuant to those regulations, the Commission is required to adopt and communicate assessment rates; the gaming operations are required to apply those rates to their revenues, compute the fees to be paid, report the revenues, and remit the fees to the Commission on a quarterly basis.

The regulations of the Commission and the rate being finalized today are effective for calendar year 2000.

Montie R. Deer,

Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-31084  Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7565-01-M
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 148 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer enemy combatants detained by 

the United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the 

United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Ms. JENKINS (for herself, Mr. TIAHRT, and Mr. MORAN of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer enemy combatants 

detained by the United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 148 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER 

2 INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO 

3 BAY, CUBA, TO THE UNITED STATES DISCIPLI4 NARY BARRACKS, FORT LEAVENWORTH, KAN5 SAS. 

6 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made 

7 available to any Federal department or agency may be 

8 used to transfer any enemy combatant detained by the 

9 United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

10 to the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leaven11 worth, Kansas. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-K of PetroQuest Energy, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
   /s/
Charles T. Goodson
EXHIBIT 31.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gregory E. Poling, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of GCP Applied Technologies Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: March 7, 2019





/s/ GREGORY E. POLINGGregory E. PolingChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76217-76218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1121]


Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone; 
Decatur, Illinois

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and

[[Page 76218]]

for other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to 
grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-
trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board of Park Commissioners, Decatur Park District 
(the Grantee), has made application to the Board (FTZ Docket 36-99, 
filed July 14, 1999), requesting the establishment of a foreign-trade 
zone in Decatur, Illinois, adjacent to the Peoria Customs port of 
entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (64 FR 39483, July 22, 1999); and
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the 
privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the 
records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 245, at the site 
described in the application and serving the area described in the 
application record, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of November 2000.
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Norman Y. Mineta,
Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-31107 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### GRAY v. STATE.

No. 20696.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1939.

R. D. Oswalt, of Vernon, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway- while intoxicated, punishment assessed being 60 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The indictment is in proper form. No statement of facts or bills of exception are in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1668 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 3, 2018 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To rename a waterway in the State of New York as the 

‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Channel’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1668 RFH

1 SECTION 1. JOSEPH SANFORD JR. CHANNEL. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The waterway in the State of New 

3 York designated as the ‘‘Negro Bar Channel’’ shall be 

4 known and redesignated as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Chan5 nel’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the waterway referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. 

10 Channel’’. 

Passed the Senate August 1, 2018. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 4, 2008*

#### KIMBERLY ANN WILCOX VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-08-050)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

*121Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimant and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On December 10,2007, claimant was traveling on the Teays Valley entrance ramp onto 1-64 in Putnam County when her vehicle struck a hole in the road damaging one tire and two rims.

2. Respondent was responsible for the maintenance of the Teays Valley entrance ramp onto 1-64 which it failed to maintain properly on the date of this incident.

3. As a result, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage in the amount of $714.71. Claimant’s insurance deductible is $1,000.00.

4. Respondent agrees that the amount of $714.71 for the damages put forth by the claimant is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of the Teays Valley entrance ramp onto 1-64 on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimant’s vehicle; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimant may make a recovery for her loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $714.71.

Award of $714.71.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1480 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1480

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to require that certain laminated woven 
               bags be marked with the country of origin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2009

 Mr. Kagen (for himself and Mr. Petri) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to require that certain laminated woven 
               bags be marked with the country of origin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKING OF CERTAIN LAMINATED WOVEN BAGS.

    (a) Marking of Bags.--Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1304) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (l) as subsection (m); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (k) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(l) Marking of Certain Laminated Bags.--No exception may be made 
under subsection (a)(3) with respect to laminated woven bags that--
            ``(1) consist of one or more plies of fabric consisting of 
        woven polypropylene strip, or woven polyethylene strip, or 
        both,
            ``(2) have an extrusion coating of polypropylene, or 
        polyethylene, or both, on one or both sides of the fabric,
            ``(3) are laminated by any method either to an exterior ply 
        of plastic film, such as biaxially oriented polypropylene, or 
        to an exterior ply of paper that is suitable for high quality 
        print graphics,
            ``(4) are printed with three or more colors in register, 
        and
            ``(5) weigh less than 1 kilogram each,
whether or not the bags have lining, are closed on one end, are in roll 
form, have handles, or have special closing features. Each such bag 
shall be marked as to the country of origin of the bag itself, in close 
proximity to, and type size comparable to, any other designation of 
origin or United States location placed on the bag before importation 
or added to the bag after importation.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 30th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```