alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1857 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 579
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1857

    To establish a compliance deadline of May 15, 2023, for Step 2 
 emissions standards for new residential wood heaters, new residential 
               hydronic heaters, and forced-air furnaces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2017

Mrs. Capito (for herself, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Shelby, Ms. 
   Klobuchar, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Tester) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

                           September 18, 2018

              Reported by Mr. Barrasso, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To establish a compliance deadline of May 15, 2023, for Step 2 
 emissions standards for new residential wood heaters, new residential 
               hydronic heaters, and forced-air furnaces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STEP 2 COMPLIANCE DEADLINE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL WOOD HEATERS, 
              NEW RESIDENTIAL HYDRONIC HEATERS, AND FORCED-AIR 
              FURNACES.

    (a) In General.--With respect to the final rule entitled 
``Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New 
Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces'' (80 Fed. Reg. 
13672 (March 16, 2015)), the compliance deadline for Step 2 emissions 
standards shall be May 15, 2023.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Changes.--Not later than 60 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall finalize such technical and 
conforming changes to rules and guidance documents as may be necessary 
to implement subsection (a).
                                                       Calendar No. 579

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1857

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To establish a compliance deadline of May 15, 2023, for Step 2 
 emissions standards for new residential wood heaters, new residential 
               hydronic heaters, and forced-air furnaces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 18, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### I. V. (Duck) McELROY, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 20668.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1939.

W. J. Oxford, Jr., of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for cattle theft, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

*295Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, and at his request the same is dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Sorsby, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered July 7, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of the stabbing death of William Rojas, which occurred during the early morning hours of September 24, 1987. At trial, the defendant asserted the defense of justification. On the evening in question, the defendant had been drinking and taking cocaine with Rojas’s girlfriend, Lorraine Munoz, at the apartment she shared with Rojas. When Rojas returned home, Munoz confronted him about her missing bicycle, which she believed he had stolen. When it appeared to the defendant that the confrontation between Munoz and Rojas was about to turn violent, he intervened. The ensuing altercation between the defendant and Rojas culminated in Rojas being stabbed to death in the street in front of the apartment building.

On appeal, the defendant challenges the admission into evidence, as an "excited utterance”, of the testimony of Munoz and another witness, to the effect that Rojas exclaimed during his struggle with the defendant: "please, make him stop, he’s going to stab me”, and "help me, help me, he’s going to kill me”. We disagree.

The jury was properly allowed to consider the challenged testimony for the purposes of evaluating the defendant’s state of mind and the reasonableness of his actions, since these considerations were relevant to the defense of justification *(see, e.g., People v Brooks,*133 AD2d 411, *affd*71 NY2d 877). *470The defendant was under a duty to retreat, if he could do so safely, prior to using deadly physical force, and a finding that he failed to do so would undermine the defense of justification (Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; *see, e.g., People v Pabon,*106 AD2d 587). The jury could have inferred from the challenged testimony that the alleged attack by Rojas had ceased and that the defendant’s actions were not carried out in self-defense. Any prejudicial effect from the admission of this testimony was minimized by the court’s limiting instructions to the jury that the statements were not to be considered as evidence of the defendant’s intent.

We further reject the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       475
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       757
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                7,791
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    17,700
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      18,171
<LOANS>                                   48,350
<ALLOWANCE>                                  391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            78,573
<DEPOSITS>                                55,964
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          713
<LONG-TERM>                                8,010
<COMMON>                                      14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                13,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            78,573
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              996
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            434
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              27
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           1,457
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           635
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           759
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        698
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  8
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              313
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   225
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              3.57
<LOANS-NON>                                   30
<LOANS-PAST>                                  90
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             384
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            391
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      391
        

</TABLE>
Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit – 10.6 
  
 SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC. 
 AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS 
 TO ACCELERATE VESTING PERIODS 
 FOR CERTAIN “UNDERWATER” OPTIONS 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) to your Stock Option Agreements is made by and between Sypris Solutions, Inc. a Delaware corporation
located at 101 Bullitt Lane, Suite 450, Louisville, KY (“Company”) and the undersigned Optionee, effective as of April 25, 2005. 
  

	1.	For Unvested Options with Option Prices above $9.83 (the “Accelerated Options”), the Vesting Periods are hereby amended to allow each such Accelerated Option to be
exercised at any time after April 25, 2005, until its expiration under the terms of the Plans and your Agreements. 

  

	2.	“Option Price” means the price to be paid for Common Stock upon the exercise of an Unvested Option, as set forth in the Plans and your Agreements.


  

	3.	“Plans” means the Sypris Solutions, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and/or the 2004 Sypris Equity Plan, as applicable. 

  

	4.	“Stock Option Agreements” or the “Agreements” includes each of your Stock Option Agreements for Options Granted Pursuant to 1994 Stock Option Plan
for Key Employees and/or each of your Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreements under the 2004 Sypris Equity Plan. 

  

	5.	“Unvested Options” means only those unvested stock option grants made to you under the Plans which have not been exercised, forfeited or terminated as of April 25,
2006; provided, however, that the term “Unvested Options” shall not include any grants of Performance-Based Options which have not yet achieved their Target Share Prices. 

  

	6.	“You” or “your” means the undersigned Optionee. 

  

	7.	All other capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Plans and the Agreements, whether capitalized in the Plans and the Agreements or not.


  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment in duplicate to be effective as of the date first above written. 
  

							
	 SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
	 	 	 	OPTIONEE
				
	 By
	 	  

	 	 	 	  


	 Jeffrey T. Gill
	 	 	 	  


	 President & CEO
	 	 	 	(Printed Name)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1088 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a one-year period 

for the training of new disabled veterans’ outreach program specialists 

and local veterans’ employment representatives by National Veterans’ 

Employment and Training Services Institute. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2009 

Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

one-year period for the training of new disabled veterans’ 

outreach program specialists and local veterans’ employment representatives by National Veterans’ Employment 

and Training Services Institute. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mandatory Veteran 

5 Specialist Training Act of 2009’’. 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1088 IH

1 SEC. 2. ONE-YEAR PERIOD FOR TRAINING OF NEW DIS2 ABLED VETERANS’ OUTREACH PROGRAM 

3 SPECIALISTS AND LOCAL VETERANS’ EM4 PLOYMENT REPRESENTATIVES BY NATIONAL 

5 VETERANS’ EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING 

6 SERVICES INSTITUTE. 

7 (a) ONE-YEAR PERIOD.—Section 4102A(c)(8)(A) of 

8 title 38, United States Code is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘three-year period’’ and inserting ‘‘one-year period’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

11 (1) APPLICABILITY TO NEW EMPLOYEES.—The 

12 amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with 

13 respect to a State employee assigned to perform the 

14 duties of a disabled veterans’ outreach program spe15 cialist or a local veterans’ employment representative 

16 under chapter 41 of such title who is so assigned on 

17 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (2) APPLICABILITY TO PREVIOUSLY-HIRED EM19 PLOYEES.—In the case of such a State employee 

20 who is so assigned on or after January 1, 2006, and 

21 before the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

22 Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall require the State 

23 to require, as a condition of a grant or contract 

24 under which funds are made available to the State 

25 in order to carry out section 4103A or 4104 of title 

26 38, United States Code, each such employee to satisVerDate Nov 24 2008 17:16 Feb 14, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1088.IH H1088

PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1088 IH

1 factorily complete the training described in section 

2 4102A(c)(8)(A) of such title by not later than the 

3 date that is one year after the date of the enactment 

4 of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
TYRONE L. SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

JULIE JONES, SECRETARY, 

DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1169

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

Tyrone L. Smith, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, 

Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to the Court’s order of March 17, 

2016, the appeal is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). The

dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief in the trial court. 

Snelson v. Snelson, 440 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

RAY, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 233 (Monday, December 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30826]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration

Availability of Funds Announced in the HRSA Preview; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register notice of Friday, July 7, 2000, in 
Part III ``Availability of Funds Announced in the HRSA Preview'' of FR 
Doc. 00-16874, on page 42223, the grant category beginning in the 
second column under the heading ``The Perinatal Systems and Women's 
Health National Resource Center (CFDA #93.926D),'' is withdrawn from 
competition while the Agency is considering its options regarding the 
activities proposed for support. After a decision is made, another 
announcement will be published in the Federal Register.
    Prospective applicants who have submitted letters of intent or 
requested application materials from the HRSA Grants Application Center 
have been notified directly of this withdrawal.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Wright, Division of Perinatal 
Systems and Women's Health, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health 
Resources and Services Administration, Room 11A-05, Parklawn Building, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; telephone 1-301-443-8427.

    Dated: November 29, 2000.
Claude Earl Fox,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-30826 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
```
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 79 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 239
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 79 Filed 09/28/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 240
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Patrick J. Pedonti, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Not applicable;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ Patrick J. Pedonti     Patrick J. Pedonti  Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
#### JOHNSON v. JOHNSON.

No. 5632.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

May 10, 1940.

Rehearing Denied May 16, 1940.

E. A. Martin and Richard Nicolds, both of Longview, for appellant.

Harvey P. Shead, of Longview, for ap-pellee.

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Upon jury findings, judgment was entered which denied a divorce to Jennie Gatlin Johnson, plaintiff below.

Plaintiff sought a new trial on alleged grounds of newly discovered evidence. According to the testimony heard on. the amended motion for a new trial, one Dr. Khoury would have testified that defendant’s arm had been broken by a blow from a club instead of from a gunshot wound as claimed by defendant. It is without dispute that his arm was broken either by a blow with an axe handle wielded by plaintiff or from a pistol shot fired by her. We fail to see where this testimony of Dr. Khoury would effect the issue as to whether defendant was guilty of cruel treatment. This physician treated defendant for his injuries at the Gregg Memorial Hospital. Plaintiff visited defendant in this hospital; saw that he was bandaged; washed his face; and carried him clean clothes. This physician was available as a witness on the day of the trial. Diligence is not shown, for on the slightest effort upon inquiry she could have ascertained the name of the physician and the character of the wounds. 31 T.J. pp. 98, 100, 105; Griffith v. Gohlman Lester & Co., Tex.Civ.App., 253 S.W. 591.

On the same day judgment was entered the court also entered an order, after hearing, which relieved defendant from paying plaintiff further alimony during the pendency of this appeal. The provision of Article 4637, R.C.S. of 1925, is conditional. The financial status of both litigants had been fully developed in the trial. This evidence does not indicate that the trial court abused his discretion.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43001, 333-27613, 333-31464, 333-31379, 333-61002, 333-95725, and 333-125062 and Form S-3 No. 333-101514) of ESB Financial Corporation of our reports dated
March 11, 2010, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders of ESB Financial Corporation, on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA

March 12, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,023
<INVENTORY>                                      1,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,357
<PP&E>                                          18,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,375
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,426
<SALES>                                         24,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,607
<CGS>                                            6,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                       984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>