alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1548

To provide for the adjournment of Congress by September 30th of each

year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 31, 1993

Mr. NUSSLE (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, and Mr. INGLIS of

South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly

to the Committees on House Administration and Post Office and Civil

Service

A BILL

To provide for the adjournment of Congress by September

30th of each year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizen Representative

5 Act Go Home Provision.’’
2

HR 1548 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE LENGTH OF THE

2 SESSION.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601(a) of the Legislative

4 Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is amended by

5 adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this sub7 section, basic pay for service in a position under para8 graph (1)(A)–(C) shall not be payable for any day occur9 ring after September 30th of a year and before January

10 3d of the succeeding year unless such day follows the sine

11 die adjournment of the last regular session of Congress

12 which began before the start of that period.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with this  Quarterly  Report  of  UnionBanCal  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
I.  Matson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  August 5, 2005



                                    By:         /S/ DAVID I. MATSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                    David I. Matson
                                                Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CL AU DI A RAM I RE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70411 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 353- 003 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y19, 2010 ** B e f o r e : B . F L E T C H E R , R E I N H A R D T , an dW A R D L A W , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . C l audi a R am i re z, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s pro se for r evi ew o f th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED AU G 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70411 2 d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 32 1 F . 3d88 9, 89 4 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng R am i re z’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed m ore than three ye ar s a ft erher f i nal r e m o v a l o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and R am i r e z f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h the due d ilig e n c e r e qu ir e dto w arr an t to llin g o f th e m o tio n s d e a d lin e , s e e I tu rr ib a rr ia , 321 F .3 da t 8 9 7 . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00154-CR

__________________

DEWAYNE LEE WALDRUP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20-10-12141-CR

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Appellant Dewayne Lee Waldrup filed a motion to abate the appeal and 

remand the case for written findings of fact and conclusions of law. The State has 

not filed an objection to an abatement. The trial court made some oral findings at the 

conclusion of the hearing on the motion to suppress, but additional findings may 

assist this Court in addressing the appeal. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (the trial court may state its essential findings on the record 

at the conclusion of the hearing). 
2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the case is

remanded to the trial court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

trial court’s essential findings on the issues raised in the hearing of appellant’s 

motion to suppress. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4. A supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are due to be filed 

in this Court by March 3, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2). All appellate 

timetables are suspended pending filing of the supplemental clerk’s record with this 

Court. The appeal will be reinstated without further order when the supplemental 

clerk’s record is filed with the appellate court. The brief of the appellant is due thirty 

days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed. Requests for briefing extensions 

will be strongly disfavored.

ORDER ENTERED February 1, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2147

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Christopher Peck

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: December 28, 2017

Filed: January 9, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Christopher Peck challenges the sentence the

district court imposed following his guilty plea to child pornography charges. His 1

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), discussing the reasonableness of the sentence.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, as it properly

considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked

a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors,

see United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review);

United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887 (8th Cir. 2011); and the sentence was

within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th

Cir. 2014). Furthermore, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1017 

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United States Code, to require 

the provision of chiropractic care and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and to expand access to such 

care and services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2009 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 

Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United 

States Code, to require the provision of chiropractic care 

and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans 

Affairs medical centers and to expand access to such 

care and services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiropractic Care 

5 Available to All Veterans Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1017 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR PROVISION OF CHIROPRACTIC 

2 CARE AND SERVICES TO VETERANS. 

3 Section 204(c) of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

4 Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 (38 

5 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The program’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) The program shall be carried out at not fewer 

11 than 75 medical centers by not later than December 31, 

12 2010, and at all medical centers by not later than Decem13 ber 31, 2012.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. EXPANDED CHIROPRACTOR SERVICES AVAILABLE 

15 TO VETERANS. 

16 (a) MEDICAL SERVICES.—Paragraph (6) of section 

17 1701 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by add18 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

19 ‘‘(G) Chiropractic services.’’. 

20 (b) REHABILITATIVE SERVICES.—Paragraph (8) of 

21 such section is amended by inserting ‘‘chiropractic,’’ after 

22 ‘‘counseling,’’. 

23 (c) PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES.—Paragraph 

24 (9) of such section is amended— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1017 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) 

2 through (K) as subparagraphs (G) through (L), re3 spectively; and 

4 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol5 lowing new subparagraph (F): 

6 ‘‘(F) periodic and preventative chiropractic ex7 aminations and services;’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011701
<NAME> RIFKIN ACQUISITION CAPITAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                       338
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         112,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,043
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,432
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,555)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,706)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The amount shown for current assets and current liabilities is
zero due to an unclassified balance sheet in the financial
statements.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,384
<PP&E>                                           2,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,351
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,952
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,964
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,585
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                       731
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,715
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
#### Jeanne Jeras, as Administratrix of the Estate of Paul A. Jeras, Deceased, Appellant, v East Manufacturing Corp. et al., Appellants, and Robran Construction, Ltd., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 3.)

Judgment affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Jeras v East Mfg. Corp.*([appeal No. 2] 168 AD2d 892 [decided herewith]). All *893concur, except Dillon, P. J., and Lawton, J., who dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial in the same dissenting memorandum as in *Jeras v East Mfg. Corp.*([appeal No. 2] 168 AD2d 892 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.—trial order of dismissal.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ. *[See,*143 Misc 2d 188.]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1486 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1486

 To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to decrease the number of loans made 
under section 502 of such Act and increase the regular payments made by 
                      borrowers under such loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1993

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to decrease the number of loans made 
under section 502 of such Act and increase the regular payments made by 
                      borrowers under such loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON LOAN AUTHORITY.

    Section 502 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Limitation on Loan Authority.--The total number of loans made 
under this section in any single fiscal year may not exceed 12,500.''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM PAYMENTS UNDER LOANS.

    Section 502(b)(2) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1472(b)(2)) 
is amended by inserting after the comma the following: ``except that 
such plans and schedules shall require the borrower to make regular 
payments in an amount not less than the amount equal to 30 percent of 
the income of the borrower, and''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,279
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,800
<PP&E>                                       2,100,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,154,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,165,301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,230
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,888,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (2,154,972)
<SALES>                                          3,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,536
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  222,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (17,445)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (236,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (236,603)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS 

FOURTEENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

Houston, Texas 

GREGORY CHARLES HURST, § 

 APPELLANT § 

 § NUMBERS 

VS. § 14-15-00539-CR 

 § 

 § 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § 

 APPELLEE 

SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE APPELLANT BRIEF 

Winifred Weber 

2525 Bay Area Blvd. Suite 310 

Houston, Texas 77058 

SBN 01672500 

Telephone: (281)488-9040 

Facsimile: (281)488-9009 

Electronic mail: winifredweber@gmail 

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT 

 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00539-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/22/2015 8:19:23 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/22/2015 8:19:23 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS: 

 Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 10.1 and 38.6(d), Appellant, GREGORY CHARLES 

HURST, files this Second Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant Brief. 

Appellant’s opening brief is currently due October 21, 2015. 

 Counsel for Appellant requests a 7-day extension of time to file his brief, making 

the brief due October 28, 2015. This is the second request for extension of time to 

file the opening brief. 

 In addition to the routine matters that counsel must attend to in daily practice, such 

as a full criminal caseload requiring docket appearances, filings, and jail visits, 

counsel for Appellant relies on the following reason, to explain the need for the 

requested extension: 

 On this date, Appellant has brought a potential issue to the attention of 

Appellant’s counsel and requested counsel to research said issue for Appellant’s 

brief. Counsel believes one week is adequate time to research the issue and include it 

in the brief, depending on the result of the research. Counsel for Appellant seeks this 

extension of time to be able to adequately prepare Appellant’s brief. This request is 

not sought for delay but so that justice may be done. 

 All facts recited in this motion are within the personal knowledge of the counsel 

signing this motion; therefore no verification is necessary under Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 10.2. 
PRAYER FOR RELIEF

 For the reasons set forth above, Appellant requests that this Court grant this 

Second Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant Brief and extend the Deadline for 

Filing the Appellant’s Brief up to and including October 28, 2015. Appellant 

requests all other relief to which he may be entitled. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/______________________ 

 Winifred Bandy Weber 

 2525 Bay Area Blvd. Suite 310 

 Houston, Texas 77058 

 SBN 01672500 

 Telephone: (281)488-9040 

 Facsimile: (281)488-9009 

 Electronic mail: winifredweber@gmail 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

Motion has been delivered by electronic email to the Galveston County District 

Attorney’s Office, Galveston, Texas on this the 21st day of October, 2015. 

 /s/_______________________ 

 WINIFRED WEBER
EX-10.(y) COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS



 






Exhibit 10(y)




Executive officer compensation arrangements


On February 21, 2005 the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of
Compass Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) approved
compensation arrangements of the Company’s
chief executive officer and certain other executive officers expected to be named in the
Company’s proxy statement for its 2006 annual meeting of shareholders as its four highest paid
executive officers: D. Paul
Jones, Jr., $975,000; Garrett R. Hegel, $450,000; James D. Barri, $410,000;
Clayton D. Pledger, $345,000; G. Ray Stone, $345,000. The changes to base salaries were consistent
with the description of how base salaries are set in the Committee’s report in the Company’s 2005
Proxy Statement dated March 18, 2005.