alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT KNOXVI LLE Se pte m be r 26, 200 7 S es sio n STA TE OF TEN NES SEE v. RO NA LD FR AN K WEBB Appeal f rom the Cr im inal Cou rt for Cum berland Coun ty No. 7796 Leon Burns , Jr., Judge

No. E2006-01793-CC A-M R3-CD - F iled March 12, 2008

The de fenda

nt, Ronald Fra

nk Webb, was convicted by a Cumberland County Criminal Court jury of driving under the influence , third offe nse, a Class A misdemea nor, for which the c ourt sentenc ed him to eleven months and twenty -nine da y s, with 120 day s to be serve d in ja il at seventy -five pe rce nt rele ase e ligibility . The de fenda nt claims on appea l that the trial court e rre d i n gi v i n g l en g thy and confusinginstructions to the jury and in commenting that the instructions were confusing . We af f irm the judg ment of the trial c ourt pursuant to Tenne ssee Court of Criminal Appe als Rule 20. Tenn. R. App . P . 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgme nt of th e Cr im inal Cou rt A ff irm ed J OS EP H M. T I PTON , P.J ., deliv er ed the opinion of the cour t, in which J A M ES C UR WO OD W I TT , J R ., and N OR MA M C G EE O G LE , J J ., joined. Thomas Har ding Potter, N ashville, Tenne ssee, f or the a ppellant (on a

ppeal) and L arr

y M. Warner, Crossville, Tennessee (at trial) , for the a ppellant, Ronald Fr ank Webb. Rob e rt E. Coo pe r, Jr., Attor

ne y Ge ne ra l and Re po rt e r; L e sli e E. Pr ic e , As sis tant Attor ne y Ge ne ra l; Wil liam Edward G ib s o n , Di strict Attorney Gene ral; and D oug las E. Crawf ord, Assistant District Attorney Gene ral, for

the appe llee, State of Te nnessee .

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION The de fenda

nt did not retain a c ourt repor ter for the t rial, and w e ar e limited to review of the statement of the e vidence and the wr itten instructions given to the jury . Additionally , no issue re g ard ingthe jur

y ins tr uc tio ns was rai sed in the mot ion fo r n e w tri a l. T he de fe nd ant c la ims he is entitled to relief a s a matter of plain err or. We have r eviewe d the appe llate rec ord and the arguments of the parties. We hold that the defe ndant has fa iled to demonstrate that he is entitled to plain error r elief on the basis that the ins tr uc tio ns we re e rr on e ou s o r t hat th e tr ia l c ourt ’s state me nts to the j ur y we re pr e

jud ic ia l.-2-

Othe rw ise , w e no te tha

t th e e vid e nc e is s uf

fi c ie nt t o s us ta in t

he ve rd ic t and

that no er ro r of law e xists that would require a re versa l of the judg ment. The judg ment of the trial c ourt is affir med.

___________________________________ J OSEPH M. TI PTON, PRES I DI NG JUDGE
NO. 09-17-00406-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JULIE FAYE MEAD

Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

---------------------------------------------------------

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES Appellant, JULIE FAYE MEAD, by and through 

his court-appointed attorney of record, Thomas J. 

Burbank, and files this Motion for Extension of Time to 

File Appellant's Brief and would respectfully show unto 

the Court as follows:

I.

Appellant's Brief was due to be filed on or before 

January 8, 2018. Due to heavy court hearings, Counsel 

overlooked such deadline. In addition, counsel has not 

had adequate time to review transcripts and prepare said 

ACCEPTED

09-17-00406

NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

BEAUMONT, TEXAS

1/8/2018 9:42 AM

CAROL ANNE HARLEY

CLERK

 FILED IN 9th COURT OF APPEALS BEAUMONT, TEXAS 1/8/2018 9:42:32 AM CAROL ANNE HARLEY Clerk
brief. 

II.

The Appellant's attorney respectfully requests a 30

day extension of time from the date of this Motion in 

which to file a brief on behalf of Appellant. This 

extension would render the Appellant's brief to be due on 

or before February 8, 2018.

III.

This request for extension is made not for purposes 

of delay, but so that justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant requests 

that his Motion for Extension requesting an additional 

period from the date of this Motion in which to file the 

Appellant's brief in this matter be granted, that said 

Appellant's brief be due on or before January 11, 2018, 

and for such other and further relief to which Appellant 

may be entitled, whether in law or in equity.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Thomas J. Burbank
 Thomas J. Burbank

 505 West Lucas

 Beaumont, TX 77706

 409/895-0200 FAX 409/895-0080

 State Bar No. 03355340

 burbank_hamm@yahoo.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of 

the above and foregoing Appellant's Motion for Extension 

of Time to File Appellant's Brief has been e-filed and 

noticed to all interested parties on this the 8

th day of 

January, 2018.

/s/ Thomas J. Burbank

Thomas J. Burbank
Ford-EPA Follow-up Discussion onHD GHGMay 20, 2011Agenda• Potential flexibility provisions for vocational gasolineengines (6.8L V10 in our case)• AD CO2 follow-up from April 14, 2011 Meeting• Supporting data for extending HD GHG mileage limiton certification vehicles to 12,400 miles• Part 1065 vs. Part 86 C02 Offset• Detail on Super-duty configurations & subconfigurations with estimated volumes.Non-Confidential Deck• Part 1065 vs. Part 86 C02 Offset• Potential flexibility provisions for vocational gasolineengines (6.8L V10 in our case)6.8L HDGE: Part 1065 vs. Part 86 RPM Unnormalization & C02 Offset.• Speed– Part 1065– Part 86Due to part 1065 regulatory test procedure changes,HDGE cycle work is ~3 - 4%lower. We have limited test data, but analytical assessment of part 1065 vs. part 86changes supports observations. As a result of thereduction in cycle work (gramsC02 / hp-hpr has increased relative to part 86 testresults..)Due to limited time to conduct additional experiments,Ford requests a provision toallow use of either part 86 or part 1065 speed normalization for HDGE engines.Technical rationale: Max test speed and rated powerspeed for a HDGE engine iswell under the 15-35% range cited for HDDE driven change.(reference: EPA420-R-008)SpdIdleWarm112)SpdIdleWarmSpdTestMax(*rpm%RPMUnnorm+−=SpdIdleWarm100)SpdIdleWarmSpdPowerMax(*rpm%RPMUnnorm+−=Concern: Ford has just identified an offset between part 86 & 1065 g/bhp-hr C02 data for identicalHDGE engines.Sample: Part 1065 vs. Part 86 HDGE Transient CycleTest Points-1000100200300400500600700600 1100 1600 2100 2600 3100 3600 4100 4600 5100Engine Speed (rpm)

Torque (Nm)861065Reference: Test Procedures for Highway and NonRoad Engines and Omnibus TechnicalAmendments: EPA420-R-008, June 2005Continued -Reference Continued: Test Procedures for Highway and NonRoad Engines and Omnibus TechnicalAmendments: EPA420-R-008, June 2005Potential flexibility provisions forvocational gasoline engines• Would like the discretion to certify “heavy as light”(i.e. certify substantially complete vehicles >14kGVWR to the <14k GVWR CO2 standards)• ABT between gas & diesel averaging sets• Trading of CO2 credits between MD trucks & Vansand Vocational Vehicles (reference Ford writtencomments in docket)
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT
                        --------------------------------

I,  Mair  Faibish,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Synergy  Brands,  Inc.  ("the
Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
              December  31,  2007  ("the   Report")   fully  complies  with  the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
              Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.

Dated: March 28, 2008

                                             /s/ Mair Faibish
                                             --------------------
                                                 Mair Faibish
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0294

CARL DOWLER, as personal 

representative of the Estate of MELISSA 

DOWLER, and ASHLEY DOWLER,

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY and DARLENE LESAGE,

 Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Christian D. Tweeten, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this June 23, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Justin P. Stalpes, Paul Robert Haffeman, Scott George Gratton, Adam Michael 

Shaw, Christian D. Tweeten

06/23/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0294
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digene Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, the undersigned Evan Jones and Charles M. Fleischman, being
respectively the Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer, of
the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company. Date: November 8, 2004 /s/ Evan JonesEvan JonesChief Executive Officer /s/ Charles M. FleischmanCharles M. FleischmanChief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350; it is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. /s/ Jack
 BravermanJack
 BravermanChief
 Financial OfficerTRIMOL
 GROUP, INC.November 14,
 2007 24
Exhibit 32: Section 1350 Certifications

I, Barbara A. Manzolillo, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medical Information Technology, Inc. (MEDITECH) for the period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEDITECH.

October 29, 2009
(Date)

Barbara A. Manzolillo, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Signature)

I, A. Neil Pappalardo, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, certify this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medical Information Technology, Inc. (MEDITECH) for the period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEDITECH.

October 29, 2009
(Date)

A. Neil Pappalardo, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Signature)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CYCOMM INTERNATIONAL INC.


1.       Cycomm Corporation. Incorporated on January 1, 1985, in Oregon, USA. A
         wholly-owned subsidiary of Cycomm International Inc.

         1.a.     Val-Com Inc. Incorporated on July 17, 1984, in New Mexico,
                  USA. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Cycomm Corporation.

2.       XL Computing Corporation. Incorporated on February 26, 1996 in
         Delaware, USA. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Cycomm International Inc.

3.       XL Computing Canada, Inc. on June 3, 1996 in Quebec, Canada. A
         wholly-owned subsidiary of Cycomm International Inc.

4.       Cypher Communications de Venezuela CA. Incorporated on July 22, 1993,
         in Venezuela. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Cycomm International Inc.

5.       Sonatel Communications Research Ltd. Incorporated on July 1, 1987, in
         British Columbia, Canada. Cycomm International Inc. has a 75% interest
         in this subsidiary which is inactive.

         5.a.     Integrated Circuit Technologies Ltd. Incorporated on November
                  5, 1987, in Barbados. Integrated Circuit Technologies is
                  wholly-owned by Sonatel Communications Research Ltd. and is
                  inactive.

6.       Sonartec North America Ltd. Incorporated on December 8, 1985 in British
         Columbia. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Cycomm International Inc. which
         is inactive.

7.       Sonatel International Inc. Incorporated on July 26, 1988, in Barbados.
         A wholly-owned subsidiary of Cycomm International Inc. which is
         inactive.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Skytop Meadow Community :

Association, Inc. :

:

v. : No. 276 C.D. 2017

: Christopher Paige and Michele : Anna Paige, :

Appellants :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2 nd day of February , 201 8

, it is hereby ORDERED

that the above

- capti oned opinion filed November 7, 2017 , shall be designated

OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

_____________________________________ MARY HANNAH LEAVIT T, President Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meetings of the Special Emphasis Panel in Computing-Communications Research (1192):

*Dates/Times:*                         December 11, 2000; 8 a.m.-5 p.m.; December 15, 2000; 8 a.m.-5 p.m.; and December 18, 2000; 8 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mukesh Singhal, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1145, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8918.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Purpose of Meetings:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate OSC CAREER proposals as a part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information, financial data, such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: December 1, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-31269  Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF WILMINGTON TRUST CORPORATION

                                   EXHIBIT 21

<PAGE>

                  Wilmington Trust Corporation has seven direct subsidiaries,
Wilmington Trust Company, a Delaware-chartered bank and trust company,
Wilmington Trust of Pennsylvania, a Pennsylvania-chartered bank and trust
company, Wilmington Trust FSB, a Federally-chartered savings bank headquartered
in Maryland, Rodney Square Management Corporation, a registered investment
adviser, WT Investments, Inc. and Balentine Holdings, Inc., Delaware holding
companies, and Wilmington Trust (UK) Limited, a holding company organized under
the laws of England. Wilmington Trust Company has the following active direct
subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Name                           Jurisdiction
     --------------------------------------------    ---------------
<S>  <C>                                             <C>
1.   Brandywine Insurance Agency, Inc.               Delaware
2.   Brandywine Finance Corporation                  Delaware
3.   Brandywine Life Insurance Company, Inc.         Delaware
4.   Compton Realty Corporation                      Delaware
5.   Wilmington Trust SP Services, Inc..             Delaware
6.   100 West Tenth Street Corporation               Delaware
7.   Wilmington Trust SP Services (New York), Inc.   Delaware
8.   Wilmington Brokerage Services Company           Delaware
9.   Wilmington Trust Global Services, Ltd.          Delaware
10.  Wilmington Trust (Cayman), Ltd.                 Cayman Islands
11.  Wilmington Trust (Channel Islands), Ltd.        Channel Islands
</TABLE>

                  Wilmington Trust SP Services, Inc. has three wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Special Services Delaware, Inc. and Wilmington Trust SP Services
(Delaware), Inc., incorporated in Delaware, and Wilmington Trust SP Services
(Nevada), Inc., incorporated in Nevada.

                  Balentine Holdings, Inc. owns 100% of the equity interests in
Balentine Delaware Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
and all of the stock of Balentine Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
Balentine Delaware Holding Company, LLC owns 100% of Balentine & Company, LLC, a
limited liability company organized under Georgia law, and a 45.45% interest in
Balentine & Company of Tennessee, L.L.C., a limited liability company organized
under Tennessee law.

                  Wilmington Trust (UK) Limited owns SPV Management Limited and
SPV Advisers Limited, corporations organized under the laws of England. SPV
Management Limited owns Lord SPV Limited, a corporation organized under the laws
of England, SPV Management (Dublin) Limited, a corporation organized under the
laws of Ireland, SPV Management (Italia) SRL, a corporation organized under the
laws of Italy, SPV Jersey Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the
Channel Islands, and SPV Management Cayman Limited, a corporation organized
under the laws of the Cayman Islands. SPV Management Limited also owns a 51%
interest in Bedell SPV Management (Jersey) Limited, a corporation organized
under the laws of the Channel Islands.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF NUMEREX CORP.


Broadband Networks, Inc.                             (Tier 1)
DCX Systems, Inc.                                    (Tier 1)
Digilog, Inc.                                        (Tier 1)
Numerex Investment Corp.                             (Tier 1)
         BNI Solutions LLC                           (Tier 2)
         DCX Systems (Australia) Pty Limited         (Tier 2)
         Numerex Solutions LLC                       (Tier 2)
         MobileGuardian LLC                          (Tier 2)
Cellemetry LLC(1)
         Uplink Security, Inc.                       (Tier 2)

(1)      Company owns 60%. Cingular Wireless LLC owns the remaining 40%.


                                      E-17