T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T Z H A N G U O Q U I, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70369 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 445- 647 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t8, 2012 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , B E R Z O N , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Z ha nguo Q ui , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . O ur 

# FI LED AU G 14 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70369 2 j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence f a c tu a l f in d in g s , Mo l i n a -Mo ra les v . I NS , 237 F . 3d 1048, 1050 ( 9th C i r . 2001) , a nd we d i s m i s s i n p a rta n dd e n yi n p a rtth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o c ons i de rQ ui ’ s c ont e nt i on tha the i s e l i gi bl e f or a s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l a s am e m be rof apa rt i c ul a rs oc i a l gr oup of “p r o p e rtyo w n e r s in as p e c if ic a r e ath a t w e r e a ll a f

f e c te db yth e s a m e r o a dp r o je c t” b e c au s e h e d idn o t r a is e th is c la im to th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 677- 78 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( thi s c ourtl a c ks j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w c ont e nt i ons not ra i se d b ef

ore the B IA ). S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the B I A ’ s f i ndi ng tha tQ ui di d not de m ons tr a t e pa s tpe r s e c ut i on oraw e l l - f ounde d f e a rof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on on a c c o u n t o f

ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e D in u v . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 2 F .3 d1 0 4 1 , 1 0 4 4 - 4 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( p e titio n e rf

a ile dto e s tab lis h au th o r itie s im p u te dap o litic a l o p in io n to h im ) ; se e al

so P arussim ova v. Mukasey , 555 F . 3d 734, 740 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( “ [ t ] he R ea l ID A ctre qu i re s thata prot ec t ed grou nd re pres ent‘ on e c entra l re as on ’ for an a s y l um appl i c a nt ’ s pe r s e c ut i on” ) . A c c or di ngl y , Q ui ’ s a s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See M

ol i na -M orales , 237 F . 3d a t1052.09- 70369 3 F i na l l y , Q ui doe s notr a i s e a nya r gum e nt s i n hi s ope ni ng br i e f r e ga r di ng the a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f

h is C A T c la im . Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 12 59 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues notsupp ort ed by ar gu m entar e dee m ed w ai ved). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.