alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jurnalul Oficial C 39A/7 fe

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 39A |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 607 februarie 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 39A

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 607 februarie 2017

---

| Informarea nr. | Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anunţuri |
| | PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | Comisia Europeană |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | Oficiul Comunitar pentru Soiuri de Plante — Cerere de exprimare a interesului pentru numirea unui președinte al Camerei de recurs (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Informarea nr.

Cuprins

Pagina

V   Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Comisia Europeană

2017/C 39 A/01

Oficiul Comunitar pentru Soiuri de Plante — Cerere de exprimare a interesului pentru numirea unui președinte al Camerei de recurs (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

V Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Comisia Europeană

| 7.2.2017 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CA 39/1

---

OFICIUL COMUNITAR PENTRU SOIURI DE PLANTE

Cerere de exprimare a interesului pentru numirea unui președinte al Camerei de recurs

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

Oficiul Comunitar pentru Soiuri de Plante dorește să numească un președinte al Camerei de recurs.

Solicitantul trebuie să fie cetățean al unui stat membru al Uniunii Europene.

Președintele este numit de Consiliu pe baza unei liste de candidați pe care Comisia o propune după ce primește avizul consiliului de administrație al oficiului. Informații privind remunerația pot fi obținute prin intermediul unei cereri adresate secretariatului Camerei de recurs (Community Plant Variety Office, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). Oficiul Comunitar pentru Soiuri de Plante și Comisia aplică o politică a egalității de șanse.

Cererea completă de exprimare a interesului și linkul către formularul online sunt disponibile la următoarea adresă: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

Termenul pentru primirea candidaturilor este 8 martie 2017 (pentru detalii, a se vedea instrucțiunile de depunere a cererilor).

---
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41341 Su m m ar yC al endar PA UL K HOW E Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant
v. POLU N SKY U N I T D efen da n t - A pp el l ee

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 9: 08- C V
- 142 B e fo r e B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O , a n dS O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IA M: * Pau lK . H o we, Te x a s p r i s o ne r # 1 4 7 3 8 5 1 , a p p e a l s t he d i s m i s s a las f r iv o l o u s o f

h i s c i v i lr i g h t s c o mp l a i n tp u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U. S . C . § 1 9 1 5 A (b ) ( 1 ) . H e ar gue s t hat t he di s t r i c t c o ur t ab us e d i t s di s c r e t i o n i n di s m i s s i ng hi s c o m pl ai nt on t he bas i s t hatH ow e nam ed t he Pol unsky U ni tas t he s ol e defen d a n t. Apro se pri soner’ s fai l u re t o na m e an y l egal en t i t y as a defenda n t does n ot w arran tdi sm i ssalof t h e com pl ai n t w h en i ti s c l ear f rom hi s c om pl ai n tt h at t h ere

United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 41341

2 i s a p o te n tia l g r o u n dfo rre lie f. Ga l lego s v . L o u i s i a n aCo d eof Cr i m i nal Proc e du res A rt. 658 , 8 58 F. 2d1 09 1, 1 09 2 ( 5t h Ci r . 1 98 8) . H o w e ’ s c o m pl ai nt a lle g e s E ig h th A m e n d m e n t v io la tio n s c o n c e r n in gd e lib e r a te in d iffe r e n c e to h is seri ou s m edi calneed s and i n h u m an e conditi on s of conf i n em en t , w h i ch are p o te n tia l g r o u n d s fo rre lie f. S ee Harper v. S h ow ers , 174 F . 3d716 , 719 ( 5th C i r. 19 99 ) . Con s e que nt l y, t he j udg m e nti s v ac at e d a nd the c as e r em an ded to t he d i stri ct cou rt f

or p roce ed i n gs n ot i n con sist en t w i th G allegos . VA CA T ED A ND R EMANDE D.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Financial Officer)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2007 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated: August 14, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Gary W. QualmannPrinted Name: Gary W. QualmannTitle: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary
 39
-78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76267-76268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as 
amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     License No.                         Name/address                                 Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4014F                 Air Cargo Centralam, Inc., 8001 S.W. 157th Court,  October 13, 2000.
                       Miami, FL 33193.
1483NF                Tokyo Express Co., Inc., 70 Charter Oak Avenue,    July 13, 2000.
                       San Francisco, CA 94124.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 76268]]

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 00-31070 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of Numerex Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stratton J. Nicolaides, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This certificate is being furnished solely pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.









March 30, 2011




By:/s/ Stratton J. Nicolaides




Stratton J. Nicolaides,




Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NAN ZHANG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-72488 

Agency No. A205-183-932 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2019**

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Nan Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72488 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility 

determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Zhi v. Holder, 751 F.3d 1088, 1091 

(9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we 

remand.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because,

even if credible, Zhang failed to show it is more likely than not that she would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to

China. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). 

As to asylum and withholding of removal, the agency found Zhang not 

credible because of Zhang’s vague and implausible testimony, and her demeanor. 

Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s adverse credibility 

determination. See Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1088-89 (9th Cir. 2011)

(adverse credibility finding not supported under the totality of the circumstances, 

and noting that “questioning an applicant on [her] knowledge of religious doctrine 

to determine if [s]he is a true believer is not an appropriate method of determining 

eligibility for asylum.”); see also Zhi, 751 F.3d at 1093 (IJ impermissibly based 

adverse credibility finding on “speculation and conjecture”); Shrestha v. Holder, 
3 14-72488 

590 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2010) (noting “the requirement that an IJ not cherry 

pick solely facts favoring an adverse credibility determination while ignoring facts 

that undermine that result”). Thus, we grant the petition for review as to Zhang’s 

asylum and withholding of removal claims, and remand these claims to the agency

for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 

U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam); see also Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 

1095 (9th Cir. 2009).

The government shall bear the costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; 

REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                 This schedule  contains Summary  Financial  Information
                         extracted  from the Balance Sheet and Income  Statement
                         for the three  months ended June 25, 1997 for Fine Host
                         Corporation,  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by
                         reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                             0001011584
<NAME>                                            FINE HOST CORPORATION   
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
<CURRENCY>                                        US DOLLARS         
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    DEC-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-25-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00                    
<CASH>                                            16,110  
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     20,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                        5,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  46,481
<PP&E>                                            50,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                    19,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   159,829 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             26,088
<BONDS>                                                0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0 
<COMMON>                                              90
<OTHER-SE>                                       108,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     159,829
<SALES>                                          102,844 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 102,844
<CGS>                                             92,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     98,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    3,685
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                1,585
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .24
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ezzial Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Pano Patsalos, J.), rendered July 30, 1987, convicting him of rape in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, coercion in the first degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. We disagree. The complainant, who knew the defendant, testified without equivocation that the defendant raped and robbed her. The complainant’s testimony was corroborated by the medical evidence, and by the testimony of several witnesses that the complainant was hysterical after the incident. Moreover, the defendant’s alibi was completely rebutted. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon *588the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We also find that the court properly admitted the defendant’s statements into evidence *(see, People v McIntyre,*138 AD2d 634; *People v Sobolof,*109 AD2d 903; *People v Putland,*105 AD2d 199; *People v Oates,*104 AD2d 907). In addition, we reject the defendant’s claim that he was denied the meaningful representation of defense counsel due to misstatements his trial attorney made during his summation *(see, People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798-799; *People v Sullivan,*153 AD2d 223).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Krupp Government Income Trust II (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Reese, Chief AccountingOfficer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuantto ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of December31, 2002 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).

 

 
|   /s/ Alan Reese                  |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Alan Reese,                            |   |
| Chief  Accounting Officer of the Trust |   |

 

1

----
Excerpt from Board of Directors Meeting Held February 22, 2005



 Exhibit 10.9 
  
 EXCERPT FROM THE 
 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE 
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 
 HELD ON FEBRUARY 22, 2005 
  
 Dr. Martin reported also that the Committee had approved long-term incentive grants to Executive Officers and recommended the grant of phantom stock with
a value of $50,000 to Directors. After discussion of this recommendation, upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Directors unanimously adopted the following: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has reviewed and ratifies the determination of the Compensation Committee that it is
in the best interest of the Corporation and its shareholders to provide its nonemployee directors with competitive compensation; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that the portion of Duke Energy Corporation (“Duke Energy”) nonemployee director
compensation that is delivered in the form of an annual stock retainer of $50,000 should be delivered in the form of phantom stock with a grant date that is the same date on which long-term incentives are expected to be granted to executive
officers; and 
  
 WHEREAS, long-term incentives are
anticipated to be granted to executive officers on February 28, 2005; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan authorizes the Board of Directors to grant phantom stock to nonemployee members of the Board of Directors. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That long-term
incentive awards in the form of phantom stock units under the terms set forth in the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan are hereby authorized for each nonemployee director of the 








 
Corporation, subject to the terms and conditions as set forth below: 
  


			
	Date of Award:	  	February 28, 2005, or if different, the date on which long-term incentives are granted to Duke Energy executive officers
		
	Award value/number of units:	  	$50,000 value awarded as phantom stock units (number of units will be calculated based on definition of “fair market value” in 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan)
		
	Vesting:	  	Units will vest ratably over five-years or, if earlier, upon (1) termination of service after attaining age 70; (2) termination of service after attaining age 62 with at least ten years of
service; (3) termination of service due to death or disability or (4) upon a change in control while serving as director

  
 FURTHER RESOLVED, That the appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized to execute phantom stock unit agreements, as well as any and all other instruments, reports and records convenient or proper to place the
foregoing phantom stock units in effect. 
  

 2