alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1995-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         664,368
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  352,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,017,348
<PP&E>                                         2,258,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (666,730)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,609,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,188
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,605,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,609,179
<SALES>                                        310,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               334,304
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,172<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,954
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
exv10w15



 






Exhibit 10.15



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	

	 	 	Benefit Summary for HR Managers

Executive
Tax and Financial Advisory
Assistance Program	 
	 	 	 	 







	1.  	This “Summary” has been written to highlight the principal provisions of the ACCO Brands’ Tax
and Financial Advisory Assistance Program. The Program Documents on file in the Company’s
office are the governing documents used to decide all matters concerning the Program. IF
THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE INFORMATION IN THIS SUMMARY AND THE PROGRAM DOCUMENTS,
THE PROGRAM DOCUMENTS WILL PREVAIL.





2. Contact for HR Managers is Andrew Pfeifer (847/484 4434) – Manager, Compensation




3. Benefit Description:





ACCO provides key executives (as described in Section 4 below) with reimbursement of up to
$1,000 (pre-tax) per calendar year for receipt of tax and/or financial advisory assistance
for themselves and their immediate family (e.g., spouse, children). Amounts may be
pro-rated for newly hired or eligible executives or for executives who terminate their
employment or otherwise become ineligible to receive this executive benefit prior to
year-end (reference Section 6 below).




	4.  	Who is Eligible?






	 	•  	ACCO executives in Fortune Brands’ Salary Grade 9 & above
	 
	 	•  	Must work at least thirty (30) hours per week






	5.  	This Benefit is Effective as of the executive’s hire date and ends on their termination date.
	 
	6.  	How Do We Pro-Rate This Benefit For Newly Hired/Eligible Executives or Executives Who
Terminate Employment or Become Otherwise Ineligible Prior to Year-End?






Executives are eligible for partial year reimbursements equal to 1/12 of $1,000 (pre-tax)
for every month they are actively employed at ACCO.




Example: An employee is promoted to a Salary Grade 9 position in March. They are eligible
to receive reimbursement of up to $833 for that first year of eligibility.



10 months X 1/12 of $1,000 = $833





There is no “carryover” of unused reimbursement amounts from year to year.



 









 






	7.  	What Expenses Are Considered Appropriate or Inappropriate As Part of This Program?






Tax and Financial Advisory Assistance provides reimbursement of expenses for services such
as:




	 	•  	Tax counseling
	 
	 	•  	Financial planning
	 
	 	•  	Investment counseling
	 
	 	•  	Estate planning
	 
	 	•  	Preparation of wills or trusts






This program does not provide reimbursement for any commissions or fees associated with
individual investment transactions (e.g., purchase/sale of equities, bonds, real estate,
commodities, etc.). Nor is it intended to reimburse participants for unrelated legal
expenses (e.g., real estate transactions), fines or penalties (e.g., tax penalties).




Participating executives may select the agent(s) from whom they wish to receive counsel.




	8.  	How Should Participants Submit Amounts for Reimbursement?






All Tax and Financial Advisory Assistance amounts should be submitted on an ACCO Brands
Expense Report as a Miscellaneous Expense. Amounts should be submitted in a timely fashion
(e.g., per standard expense reimbursement guidelines).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

### Special Executive Session

                    Date & Time:                     *Thursday, November 30, 2000, following the open meeting.*

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting was closed to the public pursuant to 11 CFR § 2.4(b)(1).

Item to be discussed: Personnel.

                    Date & Time:                     *Tuesday, December 12, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.*

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting was closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personal rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

                    Date & Time:                     *Thursday, December 14, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.*

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting was closed to the public.

Item to be discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes

Election of Officers.

Future Meeting Dates.

Draft Advisory Opinion 200-28: American Seniors Housing Associaiton (ASHA) and the National Multi Housing Council (NMHC) by counsel, Cheryl M. Cronin.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-36: Andersen Consulting PAC by counsel, John C. Keeney, Jr.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-38: Democractic Party of the commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-39: Pacific Green Party of Oregon by Trey Smith, Treasurer.

Regulations Priority Report.

Administrative Matters.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-31219  Filed 12-4-00; 2:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.1


                   FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT, made as of the 1st day of March, 1998, by and
between MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC., a Michigan corporation (the "Company"),
having offices located at 2301 Commonwealth Blvd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105,
and MICHAEL E. KORYBALSKI, of Ann Arbor, Michigan ("Employee"), for the purpose
of amending that certain Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee
dated as of April 1, 1994, and amended by agreements dated as of March 1, 1995,
as of March 1, 1996, and as of March 1, 1997 (collectively, the "Employment
Agreement").

                                 WITNESSETH:

        WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to extend the Employment
Agreement and to confirm the same herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
convenants contained herein and in the Employment Agreement, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

        A. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to extend
the term of said Agreement through March 31, 2001.

        B. Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Fourth
Amendment as of the day and date first above written.

WITNESS:                                             COMPANY

                                             MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.

/s/ Linda K. Moore                           By:  /s/ Robert R. Ryan
---------------------                             -------------------------
                                                  Robert R. Ryan, President
                                                  
                                                     EMPLOYEE

/s/ Linda K. Moore                           By:  /s/ Michael E. Korybalski
---------------------                             -------------------------
                                                  Michael E. Korybalski
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,361                  31,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,606                   8,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                     486
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,349,356                 546,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,702                  21,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,414,032                 603,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000                       0
<COMMON>                                           399                     203
<OTHER-SE>                                     772,354                 323,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,414,032                 603,576
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,373                  22,654
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,500                  15,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,342                   2,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,404                   7,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  8,908                     111
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,496                   7,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23                     .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23                     .34
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.12

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC29

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Trustee in its capacity as Custodian (a Certifying Servicer)
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2015 (the Agreement), by and among, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as
Master Servicer and Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, here by certifies in accordance with
Section 10.08 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicers activities from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the reporting period) and of such Certifying Servicers performance under the Agreement has been
made under such officers supervision and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | That, as to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
as Trustee in its capacity as Custodian/s/ David CoBY:  David CoTitle:  DirectorDate:  March 1, 2016
A99A1603.

#### TYSON v. THE STATE.

(548 SE2d 498)

Decided May 11, 2001.

*Browning & Tanksley, George T. Smith,*for appellant.

*Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Bruce D. Hornbuckle, Debra H. Bernes, John C. Richter, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

Blackburn, Chief Judge.

In *State v. Tyson,*
      *1*
      **the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this Court’s opinion in *Tyson v. State.*
      *2*
      **Therefore, we vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Barnes and Ellington, JJ., concur.*

*State v. Tyson,*273 Ga. 690 (544 SE2d 444) (2001).

*Tyson v. State,*241 Ga. App. 288 (526 SE2d 603) (1999).
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38828-38829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15287]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1335; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-19]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Captiva, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule: delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action changes the effective date of a final rule, 
published in the Federal Register on June 6, 2013, establishing 
controlled airspace at Upper Captiva Island Heliport, Captiva, FL, to 
allow additional time for en route charting.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC. The effective date of the final rule 
published on June 6, 2013 is delayed from June 27, 2013 to August 22, 
2013. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation 
by reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 
51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication 
of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-6364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    On June 6, 2013, the FAA published a final rule, in the Federal 
Register establishing Class E airspace at Upper Captiva Island 
Heliport, Captiva, FL, (78 FR 33967). Subsequent to publication, the 
FAA found that the effective date of June 27, 2013 did not allow 
sufficient time for coordination with FAA's aeronautical data charting 
service, thereby making this action necessary.
    The Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraphs 6005 
of FAA order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 
2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E 
airspace designations listed in this document will be published 
subsequently in the Order.

[[Page 38829]]

Final Rule Delay of Effective Date

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
effective date on Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-19, for the establishment 
of Class E airspace at Upper Captiva Island Heliport, Captiva, FL, as 
published in the Federal Register of June 6, 2013, (78 FR 33967), FR 
Doc. 2013-13105, is delayed from June 27, 2013, to August 22, 2013.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 19, 2013.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013-15287 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# AGENCY:

Vale District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Meeting of John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council: Pendleton, Oregon; March 30 & 31, 2000.

# SUMMARY:

A meeting of the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council will be held on March 30, 2000 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on March 31, 2000 from 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the Red Lion (formerly Doubletree) Inn, 304 SE Nye Avenue, Pendleton, Oregon. The meeting is open to the public. Public comments will be received at 10:00 a.m. on March 31, 2000. Topics to be discussed by the council will include: John Day River Plan update; Social Circle Map; Hells Canyon Subgroup update; ICBEMP update; status of roadless area review, range program status report for BLM & Forest Service offices; T&E presentation on listing process of lynx, wolf and sage grouse; discuss the need for or benefits of a future joint meeting of the three Oregon/Washington councils; and a 15 minute round table for general issues.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Juan Palma, Bureau of Land Management, Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918, Telephone (541) 473-3144.

Juan Palma,

District Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-3108  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
#### COOK v. STATE.

No. 20501.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1939.

Bennett & Bennett, of Normangee, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and was fined the sum of $125.

There are many questions raised by appellant regarding the allegations contained in the complaint and information, some of which impress us as being meritorious.

It is observed that the complaint states that affiant has good reason to believe that, etc., but neglects to state that affiant does believe that appellant had committed the offense thereinafter charged.

Mr. Branch, in his Penal Code, p. 248, Sec. 478, says: “When a complaint is sworn to only on belief, it is bad if the allegation is that affiant ‘has good reason to believe’ and there is no allegation that he ‘does believe.’ Smith v. State, 45 Tex.Cr. R. 411, 76 S.W. 436; Justice v. State, 45 Tex.Cr.R. 462, 76 S.W. 437; Tompkins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 77 S.W. 800; Green v State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 50, *136*S.W. 467.” Gribble v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 357, 111 S.W.2d 276.

It is also to be noted that the jurat on such complaint is defective in that same is not signed officially by the person whose name is attached thereto. The official title of the officer should be shown thereon. See Branch’s Penal Code, p. 249, Sec. 480, and authorities there cited.

We are also of the opinion that the order of the commissioners court directing the publication of the result of the election held in Walker County on February 29, 1936, relative to the prohibition of the sale of intoxicating liquors in said county, is not proof of such proper publication or posting. It is provided by statute, Art. 666 — 38, Vernon’s Ann.Penal Code, as follows : “The order of said Court declaring the result and prohibiting the -sale of liquor shall be published by the posting of said order at three (3) public places within the county or the political subdivision in which the election was held, which fact shall be *405entered by the County Judge on the minutes of the Commissioners Court. An entry thus made or a copy thereof certified' under the hand and seal of the Clerk of Court shall he prima facie evidence of such posting.”

We construe this article to mean that the entry, or a copy thereof, on the minutes of the commissioners court that such posting was had, would constitute prima facie evidence that such posting had been done. We do not think that an order directing such posting to be done would be sufficient.

For the errors pointed out in the complaint herein, this cause is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.