alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-10459 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES LINSCOMB, Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas (4:93-CR-49-E)

______________________________________________

November 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
James Linscomb appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. Having reviewed the evidence, record, and Linscomb’s arguments on appeal, we find that the district court did
not clearly abuse its discretion in re fusing to grant Linscomb’s motion. We affirm for substantially the same reasons cited by the2

district court. U nited States v. Linscomb , No. 4:93-CR-49-E (N.D. Tex., Apr. 12, 1996).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7295

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
MONRAIL LASHUN MADDOX, a/k/a Monral Lashun Maddox,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:03-cr-00092-LHT-1)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 21, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monrail Lashun Maddox, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Monrail Lashun Maddox appeals a district court order
denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Maddox , No. 1:03-cr-00092-LHT (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SANI TI ZED

CN 3384A Structure
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Krupp Government Income Trust II (the
"Trust") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas Krupp, Chairman of the Board of the Trust, certify, pursuant to
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Trust as of December 31, 2001 (the last date of
               the period covered by the Report).


 /s/ Douglas Krupp
---------------------
Douglas Krupp,
Chairman of the Board
# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

 Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Reclassification Petitions for Medical Devices” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                     In the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 10, 1999 (64 FR 69270), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0138. The approval expires on January 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: February 3, 2000. 

William K. Hubbard, 

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation. 

[FR Doc. 00-3015 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1475 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1475

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified 
                      estate and gift tax credits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1993

Mr. Sundquist introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified 
                      estate and gift tax credits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN UNIFIED ESTATE AND GIFT TAX CREDITS.

    (a) Estate Tax Credit.--
            (1) Subsection (a) of section 2010 of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986 (relating to unified credit against estate tax) is 
        amended by striking ``$192,800'' and inserting ``the applicable 
        credit amount''.
            (2) Section 2010 of such Code is amended by redesignating 
        subsection (c) as subsection (d) and by inserting after 
        subsection (b) the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Applicable Credit Amount.--For purposes of this section--
            ``(1) In general.--The applicable credit amount is the 
        amount of the tentative tax which would be determined under the 
        rate schedule set forth in section 2001(c) if the amount with 
        respect to which such tentative tax is to be computed were 
        $850,000.
            ``(2) Cost-of-living adjustments.--In the case of any 
        decedent dying in a calendar year after 1994, the $850,000 
        amount set forth in paragraph (1) shall be increased by an 
        amount equal to--
                    ``(A) $850,000, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year by 
                substituting `calendar year 1994' for `calendar year 
                1989' in subparagraph (B) thereof.
        Any increase determined under the preceding sentence shall be 
        rounded to the nearest multiple of $1,000.''
            (3) Paragraph (1) of section 6018(a) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``$600,000'' and inserting ``$850,000 
        (adjusted as provided in section 2010(c)(2)''.
    (b) Unified Gift Tax Credit.--Paragraph (1) of section 2505(a) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``$192,800'' and inserting ``the 
applicable credit amount in effect under section 2010(c) for such 
calendar year''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to the estates of decedents dying, and gifts made, after December 
31, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             17,402
<SECURITIES>                                       18,307
<RECEIVABLES>                                     270,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                       18,258
<INVENTORY>                                       317,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  633,859
<PP&E>                                          1,096,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                    454,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,876,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             201,595
<BONDS>                                           880,957
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              684
<OTHER-SE>                                        628,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,876,275
<SALES>                                         1,651,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,651,689
<CGS>                                           1,426,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,426,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   79,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    5,482
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 58,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (47,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (15,855)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (31,494)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (31,494)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.57)




</TABLE>
Opinion issued October 11 , 2012

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 00305
- CR

——————————— THANH NGUYEN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No . 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1670951

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Thanh Nguyen, has filed a “Request to Withdraw Appeal,” in which he states that he does “not wish to further prosecute this appeal” and “request[s] that the notice of appeal be withdrawn.” The Court construes this request as a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is signed b y the appellant,2

in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a). See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the appeal

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.
Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 116

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to increase the limitation amount applicable to contributions to candidates in Federal elections

by individuals and to decrease the limitation amount applicable to contributions to such candidates by nonparty multicandidate political committees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. CLINGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

increase the limitation amount applicable to contributions

to candidates in Federal elections by individuals and

to decrease the limitation amount applicable to contributions to such candidates by nonparty multicandidate political committees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 116 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN THE LIMITATION AMOUNT APPLI2 CABLE TO CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES

3 BY INDIVIDUALS.

4 Section 315(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Election Cam5 paign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(1)(A)) is amended

6 by striking out ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

7 ‘‘$2,000 in the case of an individual and $1,000 in the

8 case of a person other than an individual’’.

9 SEC. 2. DECREASE IN THE LIMITATION AMOUNT APPLICA10 BLE TO CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES BY

11 NONPARTY MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

12 COMMITTEES.

13 Section 315(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Election Cam14 paign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)(A)) is amended

15 by striking out ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

16 ‘‘$2,500 in the case of a nonparty multicandidate political

17 committee and $5,000 in the case of a multicandidate po18 litical committee of a political party’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Titanium  Metals  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
we, J. Landis  Martin,  Chairman  of the Board,  President  and Chief  Executive
Officer of the  Company,  and Bruce P.  Inglis,  Vice  President  - Finance  and
Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
          operations of the Company




August 8, 2003


/s/ J. Landis Martin
--------------------
J. Landis Martin
Chairman of the Board, President
   and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Bruce P. Inglis
-------------------
Bruce P. Inglis
Vice President - Finance and Corporate Controller




Note:The  certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
     "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
     as  amended,  or  otherwise  subject to the  liabilities  of that  Section.
     Registration  Statements or other  documents  filed with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except
     as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

October 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20246 Summary Calendar

FIDELIS OSAZUWA IDAHOSA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-03-CV-3944)

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Fidelis Osazuwa Idahosa app eals, p ro se , the dismissal, for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction, of his complaint seeking

review of the denial of his application for naturalization. Our

review is de novo

. A paricio v. Blakew ay , 302 F.3d 437, 441 (5th

Cir. 2002).

C ourts may review the denial of an application for

naturalization only after it has been reviewed in an administrative

hearing before an immigration officer. 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c). I dahosa2

did not comply with the applicable regulations for obtaining such

a he aring

. See 8 C.F.R. § 336.2; 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c). Because

Idahosa did not exhaust the available administrative remedies, the

district court lacked jurisdiction to review the denial of his

application for naturalization. S ee 8 C.F.R. § 336.9(d); see also

Townsend

v. United States Dep’t of Justice Immigration &

Naturalization Serv. , 799 F.2d 179, 181 (5th Cir. 1986).

AFFIRMED
exv10w2



 








Exhibit 10.2




Description of Michael R. Rodriguez Salary Adjustment, Effective February 2005



Effective as of February 23, 2005, Michael R. Rodriguez’s annual base salary was increased from
$200,000 to $202,000, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, which provides for the
review and adjustment of Mr. Rodriguez’s base salary in accordance with our procedures for
adjusting salaries for senior executives.
VI 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1826 

For the relief of Adrian Emin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Adrian Emin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ADRIAN 

4 EMIN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Adrian Emin shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) 

12 or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1826 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Adrian Emin en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), Adrian Emin shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully in the United States and 

5 shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub9 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

10 the issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for 

11 adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 

12 later than two years after the date of the enactment of 

13 this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Adrian Emin, the Secretary of State shall in17 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur18 rent or next following fiscal year— 

19 (1) the total number of immigrant visas that 

20 are made available to natives of the country of birth 

21 of Adrian Emin under section 203(a) of the Immi22 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)); or 

23 (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

24 visas that are made available to natives of the counVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:47 Sep 19, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1826.IS S1826

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1826 IS

1 try of birth of Adrian Emin under section 202(e) of 

2 such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

3 (e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

4 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You5 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

6 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

7 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

8 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 

9 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

10 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
GOVERNOR OF MISSOURI JEFFERSON CITY JEREMIAHW. (JAY>NIXON P.O. Box 720 GOVERNOR 65102 (573) 751-3222 January 15,2010



### Mr. William W. Rice Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VII 901 North 5th Street Kansas City, KS 66101 Re: Vienna Wells Site Potential NPL Listing Dear Mr. Rice: Thank you for requesting the state ofMissouri's position on the Vienna Wells site. I understand that complete characterization and cleanup at this site is needed to address the potential exposure concerns. I also understand that funding for such investigations and cleanup may not be possible unless the site is listed on the National Priority List (NPL) and enters the Superfund remedial program. As Governor ofthe state ofMissouri, I agree that further environmental investigation and remediation are warranted at the Vienna Wells site for protection ofpublic health and the environment. Therefore, I support and encourage the EPA's efforts in proceeding with actions that could ultimately lead to inclusion ofthe Vienna Wells site on the NPL. I ask that you continue to maintain close communications with the Missouri Department ofNatural Resources as you proceed through this process. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mark N. Templeton, Director, Missouri Department ofNatural Resources, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176 or by telephone at (573) 751-4732.

www.governor.mo.gov
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6595-6596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 137-002]


Pacific Gas & Electric Company; Notice of Meeting

February 4, 2000.
    Take notice the Ecological Resources subgroup of the Mokelumne 
Relicensing Collaborative will meet on Thursday, February 10, 2000, 
from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.; February 23-25, March 1-2, and March 22-23, 
2000, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Take notice the Recreation subgroup will meet on Monday, February 
14, and March 21-23, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meetings of the 
Ecological Resources and Recreation subgroups will be held at the PG&E 
offices, 2740 Gateway Oaks Drive, in Sacramento, California. Expected 
participants need to give their names to David Moller (PG&E) at (415) 
973-4696.

[[Page 6596]]

    For further information, please contact Diana Shannon at (202) 208-
7774.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-3044 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 60717-01-M