alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 
 No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.
 
 
 /s/ Boris BirshteinBoris BirshteinChief Executive OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.
 
 
 May 21, 2010
 
 [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trimol Group, Inc. and will be retained by Trimol Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EX-10.9





Exhibit 10.9


AMENDED EXHIBIT “A” TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED AND 

WILLIAM N. ROCKTOFF



	 	 	 
	BASE SALARY:	 	$3,846.15 per week payable biweekly
	 	 	 
	PERFORMANCE BONUS:	 	Eligible to participate in a performance based bonus program ranging from 0% to
 30 % of base salary
	 	 	 
	FRINGE BENEFITS:	 	Eligible for standard executive benefits




THIS COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT, AT ITS DISCRETION, AT SUCH TIME OR TIMES AS IT ELECTS, TO CHANGE
OR ELIMINATE THE PERFORMANCE BONUS, INCENTIVES, OR OTHER BENEFITS.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amended Exhibit “A” as of the
29th  day of September , 2008 .



	 	 	 	 	 
	SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ James T. Holder	 	/s/ William N. Rocktoff
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	James T. Holder	 	Name: William N. Rocktoff
	 	 	Sr. Vice President	 	 





			
	Executive at will	 	 
	Revised 07/07	 	Initial




Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated

Page Number 11
#### Ex parte Virgil ASHFORD.

No. 23023.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1944.

W. J. Duke, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Upon petition of appellant asserting that he was being illegally restrained of his liberty the district judge issued a writ of habeas corpus, and after a hearing remanded appellant. From this order appellant appealed.

He now files his affidavit advising this court that he desires to withdraw his appeal, and at his request the appeal is ordered dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1855 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1855

To permit the Miami Nation of Indiana to apply for acknowledgment as a 
       federally recognized Indian tribe, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2017

Mr. Donnelly (for himself and Mr. Young) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit the Miami Nation of Indiana to apply for acknowledgment as a 
       federally recognized Indian tribe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Acknowledgment.--The term ``acknowledgment'' means 
        acknowledgment as a federally recognized Indian tribe.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 2. MIAMI NATION OF INDIANA PERMITTED TO PETITION FOR 
              ACKNOWLEDGMENT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
(including regulations) that denies acknowledgment to an entity that 
previously petitioned for and was denied acknowledgment, the Miami 
Nation of Indiana may submit a petition to the Secretary, under part 83 
of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act), for acknowledgment.
    (b) Effect on Determination.--In reviewing and making a 
determination on a petition for acknowledgment that the Miami Nation of 
Indiana submitted, the Secretary shall not use, as a reason to deny the 
petition for acknowledgment that the Miami Nation of Indiana submitted, 
any previous denial of a petition for acknowledgment that the Miami 
Nation of Indiana submitted, including--
            (1) a denial by the Secretary of a petition;
            (2) a court decision affirming a denial of a petition; and
            (3) any other denial of a petition.
                                 <all>
```
(December 24, 1990)

#### Arista Donut Corp., Appellant, v United New York Lands Realty, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action to permanently enjoin the defendants from competing with the plaintiff in violation of a restrictive covenant in a lease, the plaintiff appeals from an order and decision (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), entered June 1, 1990, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the defendants are preliminarily enjoined from conducting or maintaining store premises currently occupied by the Sing Yuen Restaurant, Inc., at 254 Broadway, Brooklyn, New York, as a Chinese restaurant or other eating establishment, upon condition that the plaintiff file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, an undertaking with a corporate surety pursuant to CPLR 6312 (b), and serve a copy of the same upon the defendants, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of fixing the amount of the undertaking; and it is further,

Ordered that the preliminary injunction shall not take effect until the undertaking is served and filed.

The plaintiff, as tenant, operates a restaurant pursuant to a lease which provides that the landlord shall not rent any of the other stores, which are in the same block and lot as the store the plaintiff rents, to a party that "would maintain an *589eating establishment in competition” therewith. The defendants purchased the property subject to the plaintiff tenant’s rights, and notwithstanding the covenant, constructed a Chinese restaurant on the premises. Arguing that the Chinese restaurant is "in competition with” its restaurant, the plaintiff commenced this action and moved for a preliminary injunction. We find that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying this motion, as the plaintiff has established that it is entitled to a preliminary injunction *(see, Rentar Dev. Corp. v City of New York,*160 AD2d 860; *see also, Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso,*75 NY2d 860). The matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for a determination in accordance with CPLR 6312 (b), as to the amount of the undertaking to be given by the plaintiff before the preliminary injunction may take effect. Lawrence, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Applied NeuroSolutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Ellen R. Hoffing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, that:
 (1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company. 
 /s/
        Ellen R. Hoffing
 Ellen
        R.
        Hoffing, Chief Executive Officer
 March
        29,
        2007
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1934 

AN ACT 

To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel 

power engines due to emission control devices, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1934 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Remote Gener3 ator Reliability and Protection Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REVISION OF REGULATIONS REQUIRED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Envi6 ronmental Protection Agency shall revise section 

7 60.4216(c) of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (as 

8 in effect on the date of enactment of this Act), by striking 

9 ‘‘that was not certified’’ and all that follows through 

10 ‘‘compared to engine-out emissions’’ and inserting ‘‘must 

11 have that engine certified as meeting at least Tier 3 PM 

12 standards’’. 

13 (b) EMISSIONS AND ENERGY RELIABILITY STUDY.— 

14 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

15 Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

16 Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, 

17 shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public 

18 Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and 

19 Commerce of the House of Representatives a report as20 sessing options for the Federal Government to assist re21 mote areas in the State of Alaska in meeting the energy 

22 needs of those areas in an affordable and reliable manner 

23 using— 

24 (1) existing emissions control technology; or 
3 

†S 1934 ES

1 (2) other technology that achieves emissions re2 ductions similar to the technology described in para3 graph (1). 

Passed the Senate December 4, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1934 

AN ACT 

To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of redevices, and for other purposes. mote diesel power engines due to emission control
A01A0692.

#### ROLADER v. THE STATE.

(547 SE2d 778)

Ruffin, Judge.

Johnny Chuck Rolader pled guilty to aggravated child molestation. The trial court sentenced Rolader to fifteen years, requiring him to serve ten years and probating the balance. Rolader appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in ruling that it lacked discretion to sentence him under OCGA § 17-10-1 (b), which would have made him eligible for parole prior to the completion of his sentenced incar*214ceration. We disagree and therefore affirm.

Decided April 12, 2001

*Moulton & Massey, John W. Moulton, Laura A. Rice,*for appellant.

*Richard R. Read, District Attorney, Dabney Y. Kentner, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

OCGA § 17-10-1 (b) permits the sentencing judge to determine whether the person being sentenced can be considered for parole prior to completion of the prison sentence. However, OCGA § 17-10-6.1, which defines aggravated child molestation as a “ ‘serious violent felony,’ *’**1***prohibits the reduction of the mandatory minimum prison sentence for serious violent felonies by any form of pardon or parole. 2 Because Rolader was convicted of a serious violent felony, the trial court had no discretion to sentence him under OCGA § 17-10-1 (b).3

Rolader also asserts that the trial court erred in applying OCGA § 17-10-6.1 because that section conflicts with OCGA § 17-10-1 (b). In *Taylor v.*State,4 we concluded that these two Code sections are not conflicting, and for the reasons expressed in that case, we reject Rolader’s argument here.

We also disagree with Rolader that application of OCGA § 17-10-6.1 renders OCGA § 17-10-1 (b) meaningless. Rolader’s argument is premised on his contention that, aside from serious violent felonies, there are no other crimes to which OCGA § 17-10-1 (b) can be applied. Because there are a host of other crimes to which OCGA § 17-10-1 (b) could be applied, this argument fails as well.5

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.*

1

 See OCGA § 17-10-6.1 (a) (5).

2

 See OCGA § 17-10-6.1 (b).

3

 See *Taylor v. State,*241 Ga. App. 439 (526 SE2d 910) (1999).

4

Id.

5

 See, e.g., OCGA §§ 16-5-21 (aggravated assault); 16-7-1 (burglary); 16-13-30 (offenses related to controlled substances).
SERVED FEBRUARY 23, 2Q3,; 

-^ARTMENT OF 

::>NSPORWiON 

;KET0PtRATI0N3 

m rE3 2Li A q:28 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

HAJOCA WATERWORKS 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-1213 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On December 6, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed 

a Complaint. On November 29, 2010, Hajoca Waterworks ("Respondent") had filed its 

Request for Hearing. On February 17, 2011, Respondent withdrew its request for a 

hearing, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 
-. --:.«!'#-•''!" memmm-fS 

1. Respondent' s Withdrawal of Its Request for Hearing be 

with prejudice. 

granted; and ''"'' " """"'^ ""^ ^ ^ ^^ hereby 

2. This proceeding be and is Iw&by^ismissed 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

LA^^nk^ ^ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

jtl n J i^*^«iistrative Law Judge 

'&:m:i ?H 

' ?4b'? 
/ 

FAA Docket No. CP10SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Daniel R. Flynn, Respondent's Counsel 

Seyfarth Shaw, LLP 

131 South Dearborn St., Suite 2400 

Chicago, IL 60603 

TEL: 312-460-5000 

FAX: 322-460-7000 

James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7 

'Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 MeachamBlvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5099 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX; 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Packeteer, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Yntema, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, ("Section 906") that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: October 29, 2004                      /s/ DAVID YNTEMA
                                                -------------------------------
                                                David Yntema
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 11

          Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

Adjusted net earnings and adjusted number of common shares used
in the computation of net earnings per  common share were determined
as follows :

<TABLE>
                                   Eleven Months Ended
                                   September 26, 1997
<S>                               <C>         <C>
                                                Full
Adjusted Net Earnings             Primary     Dilution (1)
                                 
Net earnings                       $   2,000      $ 2,000         

Add: reduction in interest
     expense, net of income taxes       --          --
     
Adjusted net earnings              $   2,000    $   2,000
                          
Adjusted Number of Common Shares

Weighted Average Common Shares
     Outstanding                   8,146,014    8,146,014
                                    

Incremental shares for assumed
    exercise of outstanding
    stock options and warrants         5,400       95,425
                                                     
Adjusted number of common shares   8,151,41     8,241,439
                                                     
Net loss per common share           $ 0.00       $  0.00
                                                     
</TABLE>

NOTE (1) These calculations are submitted in accordance with:  Regulation S-K 
         Item 601(b)(11) although the calculations are not required pursuant 
         to Paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No.15 because the effects are less than 
         3%.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digene Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), we, the undersigned Evan Jones and Charles M. Fleischman, being
respectively the Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, do each
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
that, to my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: February 8, 2005 /s/ Evan JonesEvan JonesChief Executive Officer/s/ Charles M. FleischmanCharles M. FleischmanChief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# L_2008256EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76268-76269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or

[[Page 76269]]

other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec. 225.28 
of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by 
Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding 
companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted 
throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 21, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Community First Bancshares, Inc., Union City, Tennessee; to 
acquire three offices of an unaffiliated finance company, and thereby 
engage directly in lending activities, pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(1) of 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 1, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-31028 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P