alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
               EXHIBIT 10(j) TO SYMIX SYSTEMS, INC. 1999 FORM 10-K
               ---------------------------------------------------

                              SUMMARY OF BONUS PLAN

         The executive officers named in the Symix Systems, Inc. ("Symix" or the
"Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 1999
and other management employees of Symix ("Participants") participate in
compensation plans based upon the performance of Symix. Annual target bonuses
are established by the Symix Compensation Committee for executive officers and
by executive officers for all other Participants. Total targeted compensation is
determined based on average compensation (base compensation plus bonus) levels
for the industry. Under the Company's fiscal year 2000 plan (the "Plan"), a
Participant can earn a bonus based upon the performance of Symix as reflected by
Symix's earnings per share and revenue achievements in relation to its targeted
performance. Bonuses for revenue achievement are paid quarterly based upon
year-to-date performance. Quarterly eligible components are pro-rated against
targeted annual objectives. Bonuses are based on formulas which provide larger
bonuses for higher earnings per share and/or revenue achievement. The annual
earnings per share must be at least ninety percent (90%) of target before any
bonuses are earned. Variable components of the compensation plan are
self-correcting to reflect over or under achievement on a quarterly basis. A
maximum of 200% of the targeted bonus based on earnings per share and revenue
objectives is payable under the compensation plans in the event actual
performance of the Company exceeds 150% of targeted performance. In addition,
individual bonus plans may contain other variable components related to
management objectives, operating margins, and market or geographic revenue
targets. The Company's Chief Executive Officer is not a participant in the Plan
and his compensation is covered by his Employment Agreement with the Company.

                                       46
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



               Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

        Adjusted net earnings and adjusted number of common shares used in the
computation of net earnings per common share were determined as follows :

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Twelve Months Ended November 1, 1996
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                                   Full
Adjusted Net Earnings                              Primary      Dilution (1)
                                                ------------    ------------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>          
Net loss                                        $(18,736,497)   $(18,736,497)

Add : reduction in interest
         expense, net of
         income taxes                                   --              --
                                                ------------    ------------

Adjusted net loss                               $(18,736,497)   $(18,736,497)
                                                ============    ============



Adjusted Number of Common Shares

Weighted Average Common Shares
         Outstanding                               6,746,316       6,746,316

Incremental shares for assumed
         exercise of outstanding
         stock options and warrants                   22,172          22,179
                                                ------------    ------------

Adjusted number of common shares                   6,768,488       6,768,495
                                                ============    ============

Net loss per common share                       $      (2.77)   $      (2.77)
                                                ============    ============
</TABLE>


    NOTE (1) : These calculations are submitted in accordance with Regulation
               S-K Item 601(b)(11) although the calculations are not required
               pursuant to Paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because the
               effects are less than 3%.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of McIntosh Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the year
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William K. Malone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James P. Doyle, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William K. MaloneWILLIAM K. MALONEChief Executive OfficerMarch 26, 2008/s/ James P. DoyleJAMES P. DOYLEChief Financial Officer and Accounting
OfficerMarch 26, 2008


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.1



 






23




Exhibit 10.1

Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers and Directors




Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers




Following is a description of the compensation arrangements that have been approved by the
Company’s Human Resources Committee on January 17, 2005 for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and the other three most highly compensated executive officers in fiscal 2004 (the “Named Executive
Officers.”)




The Human Resource Committee approved the following base salaries, effective February 11, 2005 for
the Named Executive Officers:




	 	 	 	 	 
	James Tilley
	 	$	214,000	 
	William R. Glass
	 	$	157,500	 
	Mark DeBacker
	 	$	126,000	 
	Robert G. Miller
	 	$	190,000	 






Messrs. Tilley, Glass, and DeBacker were set pursuant to the terms of their respective employment
agreements with the Bank, and Mr. Miller’s base salary was set pursuant to the terms of his
employment agreement with ENB Insurance Agency. In addition to their base salaries, the Named
Executive Officers are eligible to receive options granted pursuant to the Company’s 1999 Stock
Option and Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.




As previously reported in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement, the Human Resource Committee approved
the following bonus payments for performance in fiscal 2004:




	 	 	 	 	 
	James Tilley
	 	$	27,500	 
	William R. Glass
	 	$	22,000	 
	Mark DeBacker
	 	$	18,000	 
	Robert G. Miller
	 	$	100,000	 






Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors




Non-employee directors of the Company do not receive compensation for meetings of the Company’s
Board of Directors. Each non-employee director receives $1,000 per meeting of the Bank’s Board of
Directors attended, except James E. Biddle, who also serves as Secretary of the Company and the
Bank, receives $1,150 per meeting. In addition, non-employee directors receive $350 for service on
a committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Bank’s Board of Directors or $450 per
meeting if chairperson of the committee. The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and
the Bank is paid an annual fee of $38,500, but no committee meeting fees. In addition to
directors’ fees, non-employee directors receive an economic benefit from endorsement split-dollar
life insurance policies and are eligible to receive options granted pursuant to the Company’s 1999
Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.
#### McBRIDE v. STATE.

No. 20548.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of a hog; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. .No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### Murray Gold, Respondent, v Dominick Vitucci, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action, *inter alia,*for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of certain real property, the defendant Dominick Vitucci appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), entered May 10, 1990, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The alleged contract purportedly setting forth the parties’ agreement, provides for the sale of an interest in certain real property. The record reveals that the alleged contract was never signed by the appellant, who is the party to be charged, and the appellant testified that he never intended that writing to constitute a contract, nor did he authorize his attorney to send it. In any event, there is no evidence that the appellant ever executed a written authorization to his attorney to act as his lawful agent in this matter *(see,*General Obligations Law § 5-703 [1]; *Towpash v Towpash,*119 AD2d 567; *Ochoa v Estate of Sarria,*97 AD2d 538; *Singer v Klebanow,*9 Misc 2d 1016). The appellant established as a matter of law that the plain*608tiffs causes of action for specific performance of the alleged contract for the sale of the real property or in the alternative to recover damages for breach of contract are barred by the Statute of Frauds *(see,*General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]; *Mesibov, Glinert & Levy v Cohen Bros. Mfg. Co.,*245 NY 305; *Long Is. Pen Corp. v Shatsky Metal Stamping Co.,*94 AD2d 788; *Charles E. S. McLeod, Inc. v Hamilton Moving & Stor.,*89 AD2d 863; *Scheck v Francis,*33 AD2d 91, *affd*26 NY2d 466; *Scarane v Fraser Mtge. Corp.,*279 App Div 602).

Furthermore, based on this record, there are insufficient facts to invoke either the equitable doctrine of part performance *(see, Burns v McCormick,*233 NY 230; *see also, Jones-town Place Corp. v 153 W. 33rd St. Corp.,*53 NY2d 847) or promissory estoppel *(see, Swerdloff v Mobil Oil Corp.,*74 AD2d 258; *see also, Greenbaum v Weinstein,*131 AD2d 430). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         359,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  438,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    127,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               924,878
<PP&E>                                         738,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,963,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,300,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,157,595
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,963,836
<SALES>                                        235,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               251,456
<CGS>                                           33,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  852,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               129,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             110,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (840,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (840,874)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.098)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.086)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00035-CV

Robert MEDINA and Christina MEDINA,

Appellants

v.

Timothy K. BOWERS,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-11752

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED that the appellants have an easement by necessity over 

the appellee’s property to access Gardner Road. The cause is REMANDED to the trial court to 

reconsider the issue of attorney’s fees. 

We order that appellants, Robert Medina and Christina Medina, recover their costs of 

appeal, if any, from appellee, Timothy K. Bowers. 

SIGNED December 27, 2018.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### Ex parte THAYER.

No. 20520.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1939.

Sam W. French, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

On original submission of this case, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Appellant, in due time, filed his motion for a rehearing from which it clearly appears that the Governor of this State has revoked the warrant upon which appellant was sought to be extradited. Consequently the question here presented has become moot.

It is therefore ordered that the original ■opinion herein be, and the same is, withdrawn and the appeal is dismissed.

Per Curiam.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30900]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Office of Communications; Cancellation of an Optional Form by 
Department of State

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is cancelling the following Optional 
Form because of low usage:

OF 189, Travel Reimbursement Voucher

    The form will be converted to a State Department form. You can 
request copies of the new form from: Department of State, IS/OIS/DIR, 
2201 C Street, NW; Room B264NS, Washington, DC 20520-0264.

DATES: Effective December 5, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara Williams, General Services 
Administration, (202) 501-0581.

    Dated: October 25, 2000.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30900 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

ClinTrials Research North Carolina Inc.

ClinTrials Research Kentucky Inc.

ClinTrials Research Ltd. (located in UK)

ClinTrials Research SARL (located in France)

ClinTrials BioResearch Ltd. (located in Canada)

ClinTrials Research Israel Ltd.

ClinTrials Research Latin America, SA (dormant)

ClinTrials Research Australia Pty. Ltd.

ClinTrials Research Italy Srl

ClinTrials Research Sp z. o. o (located in Poland)

CTR Acquisition Corp. Inc.

ClinTrials Research Deuchland, GmbH (located in Germany)

ClinTrials Research Spain SL.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1127]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 22 Chicago, Illinois

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Illinois International Port District, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone No. 22, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand FTZ 22-Site 3 in the Chicago, Illinois area, within 
the Chicago Customs port of entry (FTZ Docket 1-2000, filed 1/4/00);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (65 FR 2375, January 1, 2000) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 22-Site 3 is approved, subject to the 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of November 2000.
Troy H. Cribb,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 00-31108 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; MICHAEL 

G. ANDREN; TACTICAL MACHINING 

LLC, a limited liability company; 

FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, 

INC., a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his Official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; STEVEN 

DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as 

Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Case (ECF No. 20), filed August 18, 

2022. The certificate of service indicates that Plaintiffs oppose the motion. The Court ORDERS

Plaintiffs to explain their opposition to Defendants’ request for an extension of time by August 

19, 2022. Plaintiffs are directed to respond to the remaining contents of the motion by August 29, 

2022.

SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 23 Filed 08/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 337
Mr. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center, 1 2th Floor 

6 1 Forsyth Street, S W 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3 104 

Re: Clean Data Demonstration for the Birmingham 24-Hour PM2,5 Nonattainment Area 

Dear Mr. Meiburg: 

The Birmingham, Alabama, 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area includes Jefferson and Shelby 

Counties in their entirety, as well as a portion of Walker County. This area was designated as nonattainment for the 24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by EPA 

on November 13, 2009 (74 FR 586881, with an effective date of December 14, 2009. Current air 

quality monitoring data for the period 2007 through 2009 shows that all monitors in the 

Birmingham nonattainment area have attained the 24-hour PM2 5 NAAQS of 35 pg/m3. 

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Birmingham, Alabama, nonattainment area 

has attained the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination is based upon three years of 

complete, quality-assured, quality-controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing 

monitored attainment for the 2007-2009 period. 

The State of Alabama requests that EPA make a positive determination that the Birmingham, 

Alabama, 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 24-hour PM2.5 NMQS, pursuant to 

the Agency's Clean Data Policy. If the requested determination is made final, the requirement 

for the State of Alabama to submit an attainment demonstration and associated reasonably 

available control measures (RACM), a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, contingency measures, and other required elements related to attainment of the NAAQS for the Birmingham, 

Alabama, 24-hour PM2,5 nonattainment area, would be suspended. These requirements would remain suspended as long as this area continues to meet the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. 

If you have any questions or require additional information, please call Chris Howard of my staff 

at (334) 271-7878. 

Sincerely, 

Ronald W. Gore, Chief 

Air Division 

Birmingham Branch Decatur Branch 

110 Vulcan Road 2715 Sandlin Road, S W 

Btrmingham. AL 35209-4702 Drcatur, AL 35603-1333 

(205) 942-61 68 1256) 353-1713 

(205) 941 -1603 (Fax) (256) 340-9359 (Faxj 

Mobile Branch 

2204 Per~merer Road 

Mobile, AL 36615-1 131 

(25 1) 450-3400 

(251 ) 479-2593 (Fax) 

Mobile - Coastal 

41 71 Commanders Drive 

Moblie, AL 36615-1421 

(251) 432-6533 

(251) 432-6598 (Fax)