alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      BOBBY D. O’BRIEN |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|

| /s/      JAMES W. BROWN |   |
|-------------------------|--------|

| Note: | The      certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed      “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that      Section.  Registration Statements or other documents filed with      the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit      by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such      filing. |
|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1996 ANNUAL  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
THE  SCHEDULE IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            46,759,000
<SECURITIES>                                      34,404,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,045,000
<PP&E>                                                69,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (50,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   146,307,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,816,000
<BONDS>                                          172,052,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (28,668,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     146,307,000
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     29,850,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   3,397,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                23,330,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (52,168,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1,200,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (50,968,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (50,968,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (3.23)<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (3.23)<F1><F2>

<FN>
<F1>RESTATED FOR A 3-FOR-2 STOCK SPLIT BY WAY OF STOCK DIVIDEND TO BE PAID ON
      APRIL 14, 1998.
<F2>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
      STANDARDS NO.128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN>

</TABLE>
1

Werner, Christopher

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:53 AM

To: Lorang, Phil; Werner, Christopher; Beaver, Melinda

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- 

Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55)

Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_13563_03_14_2016 RH NPRM 

w....docx

Attached please find the summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the draft proposed rule 

entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55). The interagency 

comments are in response to the last RLSO version submitted to OMB for review. I accepted all changes from that 

version and the interagency comments within this version are new. 

 

Thank you and please let me know if you have any comments or questions. 

 

Aaron L. Szabo 

Policy Analyst 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

Office of Management and Budget 

202-395-3621 

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
EXHIBIT 32  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Biofield Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Wilson W. Hendricks III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date:  May 20, 2008
By:
/s/  Wilson W. Hendricks III
Wilson W. Hendricks IIIChief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      28,171,034
<SECURITIES>                                 6,347,148
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,953,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                    76,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,582,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,257,733
<PP&E>                                       4,817,496
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,791,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,425,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,272,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       138,899
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,910,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,425,379
<SALES>                                      5,456,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,482,737
<CGS>                                        1,549,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,549,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,836
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,012,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,012,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,012,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-809]


Certain Stainless Steel Flanges From India

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of time limit for final results of new shipper 
review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for the final results of a new shipper review of certain 
stainless steel flanges from India. This review covers one Indian 
exporter, Bhansali Ferromet Pvt. Ltd. (Bhansali), and the period August 
1, 1998 through July 31, 1999.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Killiam or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Enforcement, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5222, or (202) 482-0649, 
respectively.

Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute refer to 
the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the 
amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Tariff Act) 
by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, all citations to the 
Department's regulations are to the current regulations, codified at 19 
CFR Part 351 (1999).

Background

    Based on a request from Bhansali, and pursuant to section 351.214, 
the Department initiated a new shipper review of the antidumping duty 
order on certain stainless steel flanges from India, covering the 
period February 1, 1999 through February 29, 2000 (65 FR 8120, February 
17, 2000). The final results are currently due no later than December 
14, 2000. The deadline for the final results may be extended from 90 to 
150 days after the issuance of the preliminary results, according to 
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act and 351.214(i)(2) of the 
Department's regulations.

Postponement of Final Results

    The Department has determined that the issues of this case are 
extraordinarily complicated and it is not practicable to issue the 
final results of the new shipper review within the original time limit. 
See Memorandum from Richard A. Weible to Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III, November 22, 2000. 
Accordingly, the Department is extending the time limit for completion 
of the final results of this review until February 12, 2001, the first 
business day following the sixtieth day from the issuance of the 
preliminary results.

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
Edward Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 00-30953 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

January 29, 2015

The Honorable David A. Costello

Acting Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washingt on Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Secretary Costello :

On January 15 , 201 5 , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Maryland State Implementation Pla n (SIP) , SIP revision #15

- 01, from the

Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)

. The SIP revision consists of new regulation

COMAR 26.11.09 .12 ( Standards for Biomass Fuel

- Burning Equipment equal to or greater than

350,000 Btu/hr )

, and also includes amendments to r egulation s .01, .04, .06, .07, .09, and .10

under COMAR 26.11. 0 9

– Control of Fuel

- Burning Equipment, Stationary Internal Combustion

Engines, and Certain Fuel

- Burning Installations

. EPA has determined that the submittal is

administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notic e of Proposed

Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Irene Shandruk,

at (215) 814

- 2166. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

D avid L. Arnold

, Acting Director

Air Protection Division

cc: George S. Aburn, Director, MDE

Brian Hug, MDE
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/9 Fe

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1
  ) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 609 Feabhra 2017 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  *1
  )

*1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

609 Feabhra 2017

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | Eurojust |
| | Fógra ar fhógra folúntais do Stiúrthóir Riaracháin (grád AD 14) Eurojust — An Háig (an Ísiltír) — 17/EJ/01 | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Eurojust

Fógra ar fhógra folúntais do Stiúrthóir Riaracháin (grád AD 14) Eurojust — An Háig (an Ísiltír) — 17/EJ/01

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (*1)   Faoin tagairt C 42 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(*1)   Faoin tagairt C 42 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

*1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Eurojust

| 9.2.2017 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2017

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

Fógra ar fhógra folúntais do Stiúrthóir Riaracháin (grád AD 14) Eurojust — An Háig (an Ísiltír) — 17/EJ/01

Iarann Eurojust ar iarratais don phost mar Stiúrthóir Riaracháin Eurojust. Bunaíodh Eurojust in 2002 chun éifeachtacht na n-údarás inniúil sna Ballstáit dul i ngleic le coireacht thromchúiseach trasteorann agus eagraithe a fheabhsú. Tá Eurojust comhdhéanta de Choláiste de ionchúisitheoirí, breithiúna nó póilíní atá freagrach as é a eagrú agus oibriú. Tá an Stiúrthóir Riaracháin freagrach, faoi mhaoirseacht Uachtarán an Choláiste, as riarachán laethúil Eurojust agus as stiúradh foirne. Breathnaigh le do thoil ar ár suíomh gréasáin i gcomhair an fógra folúntais sonraithe agus an nós iarratais:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

Is é an spriocdháta ar iarratas a chur isteach ná 17 Márta 2017 ag meán oíche CET.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v B. J. Cummings, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the third degree, defendant argues that the denial of his motion to record voir dire was reversible error. We disagree. Defendant has shown no prejudice resulting from denial of his motion *(see, People v Johnson,*140 AD2d 954, *lv denied*72 NY2d 920). We further find that the court’s charge on circumstantial evidence concerning footsteps in the snow does not require reversal. Evidence of defendant’s footprint on a counter top, rather than in the snow, was elicited to link defendant to the crime charged.

We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
#### BAYLESS v. STATE.

No. 20078.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1939.

Baker *&*Baker, of Coleman, and Jas. M. Simpson, of Eden, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Upon a complaint and information charging an aggravated assault, the appellant was convicted of a simple assault, with a penalty assessed at a fine of $10.

No bills of exception appear in the transcript, but in his Amended Motion for New Trial, counsel for appellant attacks the information upon the ground of variance. In the complaint, it is .alleged that the offense was committed on or about the 1st day of April, A. D., 1938, whereas, in the information, the date is alleged as the 2d day of April, A. D., 1938.

The rule is well settled that the material allegations of the information must conform to those of the complaint upon which it is founded. Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C. C.P., Vol. 1, p. 314,'Art. 415, note 6. A variance between the information and the complaint as to the date when the offense was committed is fatal to the validity of the information. See Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C. p. 230, sec. 435, and cases cited. A difference of one day in the date of the alleged offense has been held to be a fatal variance. See McKinney v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 49 S.W. 376, also 23 Tex.Jur. p. 603, sec. 13. See also Kelly v. State, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 408, 195 S.W. 853.

In view of the disposition made of the appeal, we have pretermitted a discussion of the other questions raised in the motion for new trial.

Because of the defect pointed out in the information, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Opinion issued August 2 4 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00259
- CV

——————————— TERRY LAMAR BRITTON , Appellant

V. RSS RECOVERY SOLUTIONS SERVICES , Appell e e
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1187123

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Terry Lamar Britton filed h is notice of appeal on April 5 , 2023

. Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1. T he Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that unless he paid the appellate filing fee by May 2 6 , 2023 , his appeal2

cou ld be dismissed

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b). To date, Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. The clerk’s record also has not been filed. Appellant has neither established indigence for purposes of court costs nor paid , or made arrangements to pay , the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145; T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 3 4.1

. W e notified Appellant that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the clerk’s record was not filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 37.3 (a), (b). We directed Appellant to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by June 26, 2023, reflecting he paid , or made arrangements to pay , the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To date, Appellant has not responded to this Court’ notice and the clerk’s record has not been filed.
We dismiss the app eal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 37.3(b) , 42.3(b)

- (c) . We deny any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas

- Molloy, and Guerra.
#### EVAGE v. STATE.

No. 20197.

Court of Criminal Appeals of *Texas.*

Feb. 22, 1939.

Elmer Parish and Philip S. Kouri, both of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. However an inspection of the transcript evidences an error in the complaint' and information that is fatal to the conviction. The information, in the charging part thereof, alleges: “That, Americus Evage on or about the 15th day of September, A. D. 1938, and before the filing of the complaint and this information in the County of Wichita, and State of Texas, did then and there unlawfully on or about his person a pistol against the peace and dignity of the State;” and the complaint is identical therewith in the charging part thereof. These pleadings are defective in two particulars. In the first instance in that neither -alleges that the appellant “carried” such pistol; and in the second instance that they do allege that he carried same on *or*about his person.

Mr. Branch’s Penal Code, p. 556, Sec. 967, says: “An indictment or information alleging that defendant did carry on 'or’ about his person a pistol is bad for uncertainty, because the allegation is in the alternative,” citing many cases. The complaint and information should have alleged the matter in the conjunctive, and further they should have contained an allegation that appellant “carried” such a pistol on and about his person.

Both of these reasons will cause us to reverse this judgment and order the prosecution dismissed on account of the failure of the complaint and information to charge a violation of the law.

Judgment reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 8, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 23, 2000, (65 FR 51331), Radian International LLC, 
14050 Summit Drive #121, P.O. Box 201088, Austin, Texas 78720-1088, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamma hydroxybutyric acid (2010)...........  I
Thebaine (9333)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed 
controlled substances to make deuterated and non-deuterated drug 
reference standards which will be distributed to analytical and 
forensic laboratories for drug testing programs.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States code, section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Radian International LLC to 
manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the 
public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Radian International 
LLC on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued 
registration is consistent with the public interest. These 
investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, audits of the company's records, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the 
application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above 
is granted.

    Dated: November 20, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-30934 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M