T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. FR AN CI SC O J AV I ERDU ARTE S A B O R I, a. k. a. F ranci sc o Javi erD uart e, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N os . 10- 10542 10- 10543 D. C. No . 2 : 9 8 - c r - 0 0 8 5 6 - RC C- DTF D. C. No . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 2 8 1 3 - RC C- DTF ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona R a ne rC . C ol l i ns , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d M cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d appe a l s , F r a nc i s c o J a vi e rD ua rt e - S abor i appe a l s f r om the 63 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for r e- entry af t erdepo rt at i on , i n v i ol at i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1 32 6, and from the consecut i ve four

# FI LED JAN 12 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10542& 10- 10543 2 m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng r e voc a t i on of

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. D u a rte - S ab o r i c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e d b yf a ilin g to e x p la in its d e c is io n to d e n y ad e p a rtu r e f o rc u ltu r a l a s s im ila tio n . H e a ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is se nt ence i s s ub st ant i vel y unrea sonabl e i n l i gh tof the 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) s e nt e nc i ng f

a c t or s a nd the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de c i s i on t o i m pos e ac ons e c ut i ve s e nt e nc e f

orthe s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e vi ol a t i on. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d not p r o c e d u r a llye rr , a n d D u a rte - S ab o r i’s b e lo w - G u id e lin e s s e n te n c e is r e a s o n ab le in l i ghtof the t ot a l i ty of

the c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd the s e nt e nc i ng f a c t or s s e tf

orth i n 18 U .S .C . § § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) a n d 3 5 8 3 ( e ) . See G al l v. U ni ted Stat es , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7); U . S . S . G . § 7 B 1. 3(f) (r ec om m endi ng thata s up ervi se d rel ea se re vo ca t i on se nt ence be or de r e d t o be s e rve d c ons e c ut i ve l yt o “ a nys e nt e nc e of i m pr i s onm e nttha tthe d e f e n d a n t is s e rv in g ” ) . D ua rt e - S abor i a l s o c ont e nds tha tthe gove rnm e nta c t e d a rbi tr a r i l ybyr e f us i ng t o m o v e f

o rath i r d p o i n tr e d u c t i o n f o ra c c e p t a n c e o f

r e s p o n s i b i l i tyu n d e rU. S . S . G. § 3 E 1 . 1 (b ). H i s arg u m en ti s fo recl o sed b y U ni te d State s v . J

ohns on , 581 F . 3d 994, 10 02 -04 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( di stri ctcourtdi d n oterr i n d ec l i ni ng t o g rantaddi t i on al on e- l evel re du ct i on because def endant ’ s r ef

usal t o w ai ve appel l at e r i gh t s w as ra t i on al basi s f

or the go vernm ent ’ s dec i si on no tt o fi l e ase ct i on 3E 1. 1(b) m ot i on ).10- 10542& 10- 10543 3 AF F I RME D.