alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Draft Proposal CA-21

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Increase Visible Transmittance (VT) Requirements (CA-21)

Objective: Increase VT requirements to im prove daylighting effectiveness.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Table C402.3 and Section C402.3.3 as follows:

TABLE C402.3 BUILDING ENVELOPE REQUIREMENTS: FENESTRATION

CLIMATE ZONE 1 2 3 4 EXCEPT
MARINE 5 AND
MARINE 4 6 7 8

Vertical fenestration

U-factor

Fixed fenestration 0.5 0.5 0.46 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.29 0.29
Operable fenestration 0.65 0.65 0.6 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.37 0.37

Entrance doors 1.1 0.83 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77

SHGC

SHGC 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.45 0.45

VT

VT 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.35 0.35 0.4 0.4 0.4
Skylights

U-factor 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

SHGC 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.4 0.4 0.4 NR NR

VT 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.35 0.35 0.4 0.4 0.4 NR = No requirement.

C402.3.3 Maximum U -factor and SHGC and minimum VT

. For vertical fenestration, the maximum

U

-factor and solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) and minimum visible transmittance (VT) shall be as specified in Table C402.3, based on the window projection factor. For skylights, the maximum U -factorand solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC ) and minimum visible transmittance (VT) shall be as specified in Table C402.3. The window projection factor shall be determined in accordance with Equation 4-2.

(Equation 4-2 not changed).

Reason: The higher the VT, the higher the visible light admitted to the space, and the more benefit received from daylighting. More daylighting will result in less artificial lighting operation, saving energy. VT does vary by climate zone bas ed on availability with the SHGCrequired in
each climate zone.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change because a survey of available fenestration found that in general there was no added cost for higher VT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000943904
<NAME>                        WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             524,087
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   524,087
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,320,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,153,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,320,980
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    23,953
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      120,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   788,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (884,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (884,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (884,485)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         601000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2499000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3460000
<PP&E>                                         31902000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2350000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 38440000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2545000
<BONDS>                                        29404000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3000
<OTHER-SE>                                     2364000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   38440000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16803000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12932000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3753000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2567000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            118000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (35000)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   83000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6055

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOBBY SCEAN SANG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-94-271, CA-97-831-1)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Scean Sang, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Appellant alleged that the district court should

have reduced his base offense level under the "safety valve" provision, U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 5C1.2 (1994). Because

Appellant failed to raise this nonconstitutional claim in his

direct appeal, he may not assert it in this collateral proceeding.

See Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

House Calendar No. 24 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 39 

[Report No. 111–34] 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. HOYER, 

Mr. WOLF, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, 

Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, and Mr. 

KRATOVIL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

MARCH 10, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 39 RH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

2 GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

3 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

4 On June 5, 2009, or on such other date as the Speak5 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

6 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des7 ignate, the 2009 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

8 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

9 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

10 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

11 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum12 mer games. 

13 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

14 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

15 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

16 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA17 TIONS. 

18 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

19 for physical preparations for the event. 

20 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

21 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce22 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

23 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise24 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

25 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

26 Grounds, in connection with the event. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 24 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 39 

[Report No. 111–34] 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

forcement Torch Run. District of Columbia Special Olympics Law EnMARCH 10, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1316 

To provide for appropriate notification of communities and homeowners of 

establishment of flood elevations for purposes of the National Flood 

Insurance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2009 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for appropriate notification of communities and 

homeowners of establishment of flood elevations for purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Elevation Notifi5 cation Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF FLOOD ELE7 VATIONS. 

8 Section 1363 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 

9 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4104) is amended by striking the section 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1316 IH

1 designation and all that follows through the end of sub2 section (a) and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 1363. (a) In establishing projected flood ele4 vations for land use purposes with respect to any commu5 nity pursuant to section 1361, the Director shall first pro6 pose such determinations— 

7 ‘‘(1) by providing the chief executive officer of 

8 each community affected by the proposed elevations, 

9 by certified mail, with a return receipt requested, 

10 notice of the elevations, including a copy of the maps 

11 for the elevations for such community and a state12 ment explaining the process under this section to ap13 peal for changes in such elevations; 

14 ‘‘(2) by causing notice of such elevations to be 

15 published in the Federal Register, which notice shall 

16 include information sufficient to identify the ele17 vation determinations and the communities affected, 

18 information explaining how to obtain copies of the 

19 elevations, and a statement explaining the process 

20 under this section to appeal for changes in the ele21 vations; 

22 ‘‘(3) by publishing in a prominent local news23 paper the elevations, a description of the appeals 

24 process for flood determinations, and the mailing ad25 dress and telephone number of a person the owner 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1316 IH

1 may contact for more information or to initiate an 

2 appeal; and 

3 ‘‘(4) by providing written notification, by first 

4 class mail, to each owner of real property affected by 

5 the proposed elevations of— 

6 ‘‘(A) the status of such property, both 

7 prior to and after the effective date of the pro8 posed determination, with respect to flood zone 

9 and flood insurance requirements under this 

10 Act and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 

11 1973; 

12 ‘‘(B) the process under this section to ap13 peal a flood elevation determination; and 

14 ‘‘(C) the mailing address and phone num15 ber of a person the owner may contact for more 

16 information or to initiate an appeal.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT
                        --------------------------------

I,  Mair  Faibish,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Synergy  Brands,  Inc.  ("the
Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
              December  31,  2005  ("the   Report")   fully  complies  with  the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
              Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.

Dated: April 12, 2006

                                             /s/ Mair Faibish
                                             --------------------
                                                 Mair Faibish
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32




<PAGE>



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ONTV, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Daniel M. Fasano, the Chief Executive
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



May 23, 2005                         By:    /s/ Daniel M. Fasano
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Daniel M. Fasano, Chief Executive
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
2006_Shelby_RoadTypeDistributio

sourceTypeID

roadTypeIDroadTypeVMTFraction 11 1 0 11 2 0.013768 11 30.072177 11 40.291657 11 5 0.622399 21 1 0 21 2 0.013768 21 30.072177 21 40.291657 21 5 0.622399 31 1 0 31 2 0.013768 31 30.072177 31 40.291657 31 5 0.622399 32 1 0 32 2 0.013768 32 30.072177 32 40.291657 32 5 0.622399 41 1 0 41 2 0.022911 41 30.057519 41 4 0.4469 41 5 0.47267 42 1 0 42 2 0.022911 42 30.057519 42 4 0.4469 42 5 0.47267 43 1 0 43 2 0.022911 43 30.057519 43 4 0.4469 43 5 0.47267 51 1 0 51 2 0.022911 51 30.057519 51 4 0.4469 51 5 0.47267 52 1 0 52 2 0.022911 52 30.057519 52 4 0.4469 52 5 0.47267 53 1 0 53 2 0.022911 53 30.057519 53 4 0.4469

Page 12006_Shelby_RoadTypeDistributio

53 5 0.47267 54 1 0 54 2 0.022911 54 30.057519 54 4 0.4469 54 5 0.47267 61 1 0 61 2 0.076991 61 30.048275 61 40.707182 61 5 0.167551 62 1 0 62 2 0.076991 62 30.048275 62 40.707182 62 5 0.167551

Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000871367
<NAME> 91B.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         200,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               337,039
<PP&E>                                       9,704,606
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,616,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,424,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,397,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,424,808
<SALES>                                      1,273,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,294,794
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,072,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                222,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            222,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### MIRES v. STATE.

No. 15475.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1932.

A. C. Chrisman and Gean B. Turner, both of Cleburne, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s, Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

Theft of chickens is the offense; .penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

From the record it appears that the appellant is at large by virtue of an appeal bond. The bond is defective in that it fails to show that it was approved by the sheriff. See article 818, O. O. P. 1925. In the absence of a sufficient bond, it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal, which is accordingly done, with the statement, however, that the appeal will.be reinstated upon the filing in the court below, a bond in compliance with the statute, article 835, C. O. P., and a eer-tilled copy thereof in this court within fifteen days,

The appeal is dismissed,
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the periodending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  James F. Lynch |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James F.  Lynch          |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |
| November 9,  2004        |

 

----
exv10w50



 






EXHIBIT 10.50




TERMINATION AGREEMENT




     This Termination Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 3rd day of May,
2005 (“Effective Date”) by and between AESP, Inc. (“AESP”), a Florida Corporation, and
Daidone-Steffens, LLC, a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Company (“Daidone”).



     WHEREAS, AESP and Daidone are parties to that certain License Agreement dated December 31,
2003 (“License Agreement”), and



     WHEREAS, AESP and Daidone have agreed that the License Agreement shall be terminated effective
as of the Effective Date.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto agree as follows:




	 	1.  	The License Agreement is hereby terminated, effective as of the Effective Date. As of
such date, the parties hereby release each other from any and all obligations under the
License Agreement.
	 
	 	2.  	AESP and Daidone hereby fully and forever release, acquit, discharge and hold one
another harmless from any and all, and all manner of, actions and causes of action,
claims, suits, costs, debts, sums of money, claims and demands, presently known or
unknown, whatsoever in law or equity or otherwise, which AESP or Daidone ever had, now has
or may now have, or will have in the future, by reason of any matter, cause or thing
whatsoever, from the beginning of the world and all times thereafter, including without
limitation all matters arising out of the License Agreement.
	 
	 	3.  	This agreement may not be modified, amended, supplemented, cancelled, or discharged,
except by written agreement executed by all parties.
	 
	 	4.  	This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties in respect of its
subject matter and supercedes all prior agreements and understandings (oral or written)
between or among the parties with respect to such subject matter.
	 
	 	5.  	The rights and obligations of this agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of
the parties and their respective successors and assigns.





[Signatures appear on following page]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above
written.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	For AESP, Inc.

 	 
	 	/s/ Slav Stein
 	 
	 	Print Name:  	Slav Stein 	 
	 	Title:  	CEO 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	For Daidone-Steffens, LLC

 	 
	 	/s/ Terrence Daidone
 	 
	 	Print Name:  	Terrence Daidone 	 
	 	Title:  	CEO