alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76153-76154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31045]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD 05-00-053]


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Approaches to 
Annapolis Harbor, Spa Creek, and Severn River, Annapolis, Maryland

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations 
at 33 CFR 100.511 for the Eastport Yacht Club Lighted Boat Parade, a 
marine event to be held December 9, 2000, on the waters of Spa Creek 
and the Severn River at Annapolis, Maryland. These special local 
regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic due to the confined 
nature of the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the event. 
The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area 
for the safety of spectators and vessels transiting the event area.

DATES: 33 CFR 100.511 is effective from 4:45 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. on 
December 9, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer R. L. Houck, 
Marine Events Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 
2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2674.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Eastport Yacht Club will sponsor a 
lighted boat parade on the waters of the Severn River and Spa Creek at 
Annapolis, Maryland. The event will consist of approximately 50 
vessels, ranging in length from 20 to 55 feet, traveling at slow speed 
along two separate parade routes in Annapolis Harbor. In order to 
ensure the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels, 
33 CFR 100.511 will be in effect for the duration of the event. Under 
provisions of 33 CFR 100.511, vessels may not enter the regulated area 
without permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Spectator 
vessels may anchor outside the regulated area but may not block a 
navigable channel. Because these restrictions will only be in effect 
for a limited period, they should not result in a significant 
disruption of maritime traffic.


[[Page 76154]]


    Dated: November 21, 2000.
T.C. Paar,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 00-31045 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Financial Officer) I, Gary W. Qualmann, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2005 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    [Reserved];c.
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Dated: May 12, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Gary W. QualmannPrinted Name: Gary W. QualmannTitle: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurerand Secretary
 26
Order filed, May 01, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00118

- CR

____________ AHMAD PEYRAVI , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 919251



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 11, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On March 26, 2013 , this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Be cause the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Pamela Knobloch , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will beentertaine d absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Pamela Knobloch does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
*OPINION ISSUED DECEMBER 7, 2007*

#### WV REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY VS. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS

(CC-07-346)

Chad Cardinal, Attorney at Law, for claimant.

Charles Houdyschell Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant, Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, provides and maintains the Northern Regional Jail, the North Central Regional Jail, the Potomac Highlands Regional Jail, and the Tygart Valley Regional Jail, as facilities for the incarceration of prisoners who have committed crimes in various counties. Some of the prisoners held in these regional jails have been sentenced to facilities owned and maintained by the respondent, Division of Corrections. Claimant brought this action in the amount of $877,753.00 to recover the costs of housing and providing associated services to prisoners who have been sentenced to a State penal institution, but due to circumstances beyond the control of the claimant, these prisoners have had to remain in the regional jails for periods of time beyond the dates of the commitment orders.

Respondent filed an Answer admitting the validity of the claim and that the amount of the claim is fair and reasonable.

This Court has determined in prior claims by claimant for the cost of housing inmates that respondent is liable to claimant for these costs, and the Court has made the appropriate awards. This issue was considered by the Court previously in the claim of *County Comm'n. of Mineral County v. Div. of Corrections,*18 Ct. Cl. 88 (1990), wherein the Court held that the respondent is liable for the cost of housing inmates.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to claimant in the amount of $877,753.00.

Award of $877,753.00.
---

Exhibit 32.2

Principal Executive Officers Certification Pursuant To
Section 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of American Natural Energy
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven P. Ensz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Steven P. Ensz



Steven P. Ensz Chief Financial Officer March 31, 2011

---
#### HEDGES et al. v. STATE.

No. 20534.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 21, 1940.

Wm. E. Davenport, of San Angelo, for appellants.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

This case is a companion case to S. M. Hedges et al. v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 136 S.*608W.2d 606, and presents itself in the same condition and under the same circumstances as that case.

Merely because the two bonds are in the same amount, and executed by the same parties, will not render their citations interchangeable so that each citation can be moved from one case over into the other by means of a trial amendment. Each bond is a separate undertaking, and possibly susceptible to separate defenses, and the office of a trial amendment can not be utilized for the purpose of correcting a fatal variance between the allegation and the proof.

The judgmen of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

On State’s Motion for Rehearing

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

After carefully re-examining the record in the light of the state’s motion for rehearing we are constrained to adhere to the conclusion expressed in the original opinion.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                 					16,731,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                            			   						0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      						18,681,597
<PP&E>                                    	130,424,357
<DEPRECIATION>                          	 	(18,601,336)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             130,504,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      		6,343,295
<BONDS>																							   		        	68,777,742
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                               	  55,383,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            		 130,504,618
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          		11,687,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,316,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          	2,083,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,371,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,371,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                	1,371,429
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.2 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Jack Braverman, certify
 that:1.
I have reviewed this
 quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Trimol Group, Inc.2.
Based on my knowledge,
 this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
 fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
 in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
 misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the
 financial statements, and other financial information included in this
 quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
 for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
The registrants other
 certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
 disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14
 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:a)
designed such disclosure
 controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
 registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
 others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
 quarterly report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the
 effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
 date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
 Evaluation Date); andc)
presented in this
 quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
 controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.
The registrants other
 certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
 evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
 registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
 function):a)
all significant
 deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
 adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
 report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any
 material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud, whether or not
 material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
 role in the registrants internal controls; and6.
The registrants other
 certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or
 not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
 that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
 our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
 significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  August 14, 2007
By /s/ Jack BravermanChief Financial Officer 23
**Exhibit 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Joel E. Biggerstaff, Chairman of theBoard, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Gary W. Qualmann, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCorporation and its subsidiaries.       /s/ Joel E. Biggerstaff   /s/Gary W. Qualmann   Joel E. Biggerstaff    Gary W. Qualmann  Chairman of the Board, Chief   Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and  Executive Officer and President   Secretary         Dated: August 9, 2006   Dated: August 9, 2006   * This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specificallyincorporates it by reference into any such filing.
#### RINCONES v. STATE.

No. 19954.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1938.

W. E. Stone, of Galveston, for appellant.

*265Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to murder. Punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a’ term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. No defect in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or perceived. Consequently, no question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.,

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DENNIS L. HARTMAN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 405 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 75

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1994, as ‘‘National Good Teen

Day’’.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed

January 16, 1992, as ‘‘Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in

the United States according to the 1990 Census;

Whereas our Nation’s teenagers represent an important part

of our society, and the many physical and emotional

changes and character-building experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;

Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who

have problems or those who excel;
2

HJ 75 RFS

Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their

intelligence, abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the

good which is inherent in all human beings;

Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to

esteem the good as well as the potential that is within

each of them;

Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive

qualities in America’s youth; and

Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That January 16, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Good

4 Teen Day’’, and the President is authorized and requested

5 to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers

7 of the United States and by participating in appropriate

8 ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>

  The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and  statement  of  operations  and is  qualified  in its entirety to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          8,024
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  52,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (4,280)
<INVENTORY>                                59,747<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               74,305
<PP&E>                                        134,625
<DEPRECIATION>                               (29,004)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                221,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,075
<BONDS>                                   177,563<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          53,320
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          146
<OTHER-SE>                               (40,447)<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  221,657
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              239,317
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              241,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (19,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (7,495)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (11,723)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (11,723)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.31)

<FN>
<F1>Includes  the  following  assets:  prepaid  expenses  and other of  $12,713,
  deferred income taxes--current of $5,303,  deferred income taxes--long-term of
  $15,684,  restricted cash of $4,578,  deferred financing and other non-current
  assets,  net, of $11,782,  note  receivable  $7,487 and other assets,  net, of
  $2,200.
<F2>Includes the following long-term liabilities:  deferred income of $2,042 and
  long-term debt of $175,521.
<F3>Includes  the  following  equity  accounts:  additional  paid-in  capital of
  $193,547 treasury stock of ($183,746) and accumulated deficit of ($50,248).
</FN>

</TABLE>
1

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Injunction (ECF No. 3), filed October 10, 2022. 

Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Department of Education and 

Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona (“Defendants”) from enforcing, applying, or 

implementing the Debt Forgiveness Program anywhere within the Department’s jurisdiction. The 

Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs to serve process upon Defendants without delay. The Court 

further ORDERS Plaintiffs to attempt to meet, confer, and file a status report providing a proposed 

briefing schedule to address Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunction. This status report is due no later than 

October 17, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED on this 10th day of October, 2022.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MYRA BROWN AND ALEXANDER 

TAYLOR,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-cv-00908-O

ORDER

Case 4:22-cv-00908-O Document 6 Filed 10/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 142