alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 00N-1504]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Guidance for Industry on How to Use E-Mail to Submit 
Information to the Center for Veterinary Medicine

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Industry on How to 
Use E-Mail to Submit Information to the Center for Veterinary 
Medicine'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Office of Information 
Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 21, 
2000 (65 FR 57192), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0454. 
The approval expires on November 30, 2003. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: November 28, 2000.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-31150 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

CYNTHIA A. F'RANDRIA NO. 

### 2021 CW 1324 VERSUS SUSAN M. GARDNER, ET AL. FEBRUARY 14, 

### 2022

In Re: 

### Cynthia A. Frandria, 

### applying 

### for supervisory writs,



### 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 

### 2020--0001051.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The relator Cynthia A. Frandria' s motion to appeal 

### and her motion and second request 

### for devolutive appeal were not 

## timely filed. Notice of the August 

### 31, 2020, judgment at 

### issue was mailed on 

### September 14, 

### 2020. Ms. Frandria 

### filed her motion for appeal an 

## February 22, 2021, and 

### her motion and second request for appeal on June 17, 2021. Under La. Code Civ. P. art. 

### 2087, Ms. 

### Frandria's motions 

### for appeal were not 

### timely filed. Without a 

### showing of timeliness, we 

### have no 

### jurisdiction to consider 

### her writ application. 

### See Sanchez Law Firm, LLC v. Sherman, 

### 2018-0416 ( La. 

### App. lst Cir. 7/ 11/ 18), 2018 WL 3388030, 2 ( unpublished)("[ 

## T]hedefect ofnottakinganappealtimely is jurisdictional, and neither counsel, the trial court, nor the appellant court 

### has the 

### authority to extend this 

## delay.") citation omitted). PMC JEW MRT

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTY CLERK 3F COURT FOR THE COURT
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Zachary Isacc Winegeart

, * From the 9 1st District Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 22505

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 299

- CR * March 19, 2020

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(P anel consists of: Stretcher, J.,

Wright, S.C. J.

, sitting by assignment

, and Judge Trotter, sitting by

assignment )

(Bailey, C. J., and Willson, J.,

not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opi nion, w e modify the judgment of the trial court to delete the court costs of

$705.98. We also delete the fine of $2,000 and the assessment of attorney’s

fe es in the amount of $400 from the bill of cost. As modified, we affirm the

judgment of the trial court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

# AGENCY:

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ledia Esther Bernal, Director, Office of Financial and Administrative Services, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 1120 20th Street, NW., 9th Floor, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 606-5390.                              ( print page 76313)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4313(c)(1) through (5) of title 5 U.S.C. requires each agency to establish in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more Performance Review Board(s). 

Members of the Performance Review Board are: 

1. Elizabeth M. Thornton, Director, Office of Field Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 

2. Richard L. Baker, Executive Director, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.

3. Earl R. Ohman, Jr., General Counsel, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. 

4. Patricia A. Randle, Executive Director, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. 

Dated: November 30, 2000.

Thomasina V. Rogers,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 00-30992  Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7600-01-M
#### In the Matter of Ebbetts Field Cafe, Inc., Petitioner, v Thomas A. Duffy, Jr., as Chairman of the State Liquor Authority, et al., Respondents.

Determination of the respondent New York State Liquor Authority, dated March 6, 1990, which suspended petitioner Ebbetts Field Cafe, Inc.’s liquor license for a period of 25 days plus a $1,000 bond forfeiture, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of Sup Ct, NY County [C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.], entered May 16, 1990) unanimously dismissed, without costs.

We find that the uncontroverted testimony of the undercover officers at the statutory hearing furnished substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner suffered or permitted gambling on the licensed premises, in violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, and that petitioner permitted the keeping or maintaining on the licensed premises of a video display game machine of the type prohibited under rule 36.1 (t) of the Rules of the State Liquor Authority (9 *310NYCRR 53.1 [t]). The illegality of the "Trivia Whiz” video game machine is uncontested.

We find the penalty imposed to be appropriate to the offense. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Amendment 29 to Retirement Plan


 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 EXECUTION COPY 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 29 
  
 TO THE 
  
 UPS
RETIREMENT PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, United Parcel Service of America,
Inc. (“UPS”) and its affiliated corporations established the UPS Retirement Plan (“Plan”) for the benefit of its employees, in order to provide benefits to those employees upon their retirement, disability, or death, effective as
of September 1, 1961; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Plan, as adopted and
amended from time to time, was amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 1976 to comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended on a number of occasions since January 1, 1976, the most recent being Amendment No. 28;
and 
  
 WHEREAS, this amendment to the Plan is adopted to account
for certain provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 by providing that the automatic cash-out provisions of the Plan are limited to vested accrued benefits, the present value of which is less than $1,000.

  
 NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in the Board
of Directors by Section 7.1 of the Plan, the UPS Retirement Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. Section 5.3(g), Cash-Out of Benefits, is hereby amended effective as of March 1, 2005 by adding the following new sentence immediately following the first sentence to read as follows: 
  
 Provided however, that if the Present Value of such benefit is $1,000 or greater, no such
payment shall be made after March 1, 2005. 
  
 2. Section 5.5(e), Qualified
Joint and Survivor (Husband and Wife) Preretirement Survivor Benefit, is hereby amended effective March 1, 2005 by adding the following new sentence immediately following the first sentence to read as follows: 
  
 Provided however, that if the Present Value of such benefit is $1,000 or greater, no such
payment shall be made after March 1, 2005. 
  
 3. Except as otherwise provided,
this amendment shall be effective as of March 1, 2005. 
  








 4. Except as amended herein, the Plan as in effect before this Amendment No. 29 shall remain in full force and effect.

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned certify that United Parcel
Service of America, Inc. based upon action by its Board of Directors on this 21st day of March, 2005, has caused
this Amendment No. 29 to be adopted. 
  

					
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.

			
	/s/    ALLEN E. HILL        	 	 	 	/s/    MICHAEL L. ESKEW        
	 Allen E. Hill
 Secretary
	 	 	 	 Michael L. Eskew
 Chairman
#### GILBERT v. STATE.

No. 20480.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1939.

J. A. Rhodes, of Brenham, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Davis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered August 4, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and burglary in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The *566appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Winick, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress a statement allegedly made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The statement made by the defendant to one of his codefendants during his detention, after his arrest, which was overheard by law enforcement officials, was not the result of custodial interrogation and, in fact, was spontaneously made *(see, People v Bryant,*87 AD2d 873, *affd*59 NY2d 786; *see also, People v Rogers,*52 NY2d 527, *cert denied*454 US 898). Thus, the hearing court did not err in refusing to suppress it.

The defendant’s contention that his right to confrontation was violated by the introduction into evidence of his nontestifying codefendant’s admission *(see, Bruton v United States,*391 US 123), has not been preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Russell,*71 NY2d 1016). In any event, the contention is without merit, as the codefendant’s admission neither explicitly nor implicitly inculpated the defendant *(see, People v Anderson,*153 AD2d 893; *People v Quinones,*141 AD2d 569).

Viewing the evidence, which was not entirely circumstantial, in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted in concert with his codefendants to commit the crimes of which he was convicted.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find that it does not warrant reversal. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29044]



[[Page 68157]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-930-1430-HN; Nev-067245]


Notice of Opening Order of Public Lands; Washoe County, NV

SUMMARY: This notice opens the following described 153.48 acres of 
public land in Spanish Springs Valley to the operation of the public 
land laws:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 20 N., R. 20 E.,
    Sec. 14, lots 1-3, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\.


EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of this Notice is November 29, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo Ann Hufnagle, Realty Specialist, 
Bureau of Land Management, Carson City Field Office, 5665 Morgan Mill 
Road, Carson City, NV 89701; telephone (775) 885-6000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 5, 1967, Patent No. 27-68-0044 
was issued to Washoe County pursuant to the Recreation and Public 
Purposes Act of June 14, 1926 (44 Stat. 741; 43 U.S.C. 869) as amended, 
for the above-described land. The land was never developed for 
recreational use and Washoe County has reconveyed that land to the 
United States.
    At 10 a.m. on November 29, 2000, the land will become open to the 
operation of the public land laws generally, subject to valid existing 
rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, other segregations of 
record and the requirements of applicable law. All valid applications 
received at or prior to 10 a.m. on November 29, 2000, shall be 
considered as simultaneously filed at that time. Those received 
thereafter shall be considered in the order of filing.
    At 10 a.m. on December 14, 2000, the land will also be open to 
location under the United States mining laws. Appropriation of the land 
under the general mining laws prior to the date and time of restoration 
is unauthorized. Any such attempted appropriation, including attempted 
adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 38, shall vest no rights against the 
United States. Acts required to establish a location and to initiate a 
right of possession are governed by State law where not in conflict 
with Federal law. The Bureau of Land Management will not intervene in 
disputes between rival locators over possessory rights since Congress 
has provided for such determination in local courts.

    Dated: November 1, 2000.
Richard Conrad,
Assistant Manager, Non-renewable Resources.
[FR Doc. 00-29044 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
Exhibit 22

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


Set forth below is a list of all  subsidiaries  of Burlington  Industries,  Inc.
(the  "Corporation")*  and, as to each person  named,  the  percentage of voting
securities owned, or other bases of control, by its immediate parent.



                                          
                                                    Percentage of Voting
                                State or            Power Represented by
                              Jurisdiction          Securities Owned by
                                   of               the Corporation on
       Name                   Incorporation         October 3, 1998
-----------------------       -------------         ---------------------

Burlington Fabrics Inc.          Delaware                    100%

B.I. Funding, Inc.               Delaware                    100%

Insuratex, Ltd.                  Bermuda                     100%

Textiles Morelos, S.A. de C.V.   Mexico                      100%




----------------------------

*      The names of 20 domestic  subsidiaries  (4 of which are  inactive) and 14
       foreign  subsidiaries  have  been  omitted  because,  considered  in  the
       aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary. All of the
       foregoing   subsidiaries  are  included  in  the  consolidated  financial
       statements of the Corporation.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |        |  |                         
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Thomas R. Oxenreiter
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Thomas R. Oxenreiter    
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1773 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to limit the overall rate of return 

for crop insurance providers and remove the requirement of budget 

neutrality in the Standard Reinsurance Agreement. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to limit the overall rate of return for crop insurance providers and remove the requirement of budget neutrality in the Standard Reinsurance Agreement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REINSURANCE. 

4 Section 508(k) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 

5 U.S.C. 1508(k)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (3)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘(3) SHARE OF RISK.— 

8 The’’ and inserting the following: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1773 IS

1 ‘‘(3) RISK.— 

2 ‘‘(A) SHARE OF RISK.—The’’; and 

3 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(B) LIMITATION ON AVERAGE RATE OF

5 RETURN.—The target average rate of return for 

6 reinsured companies for the 2018 reinsurance 

7 year and each subsequent reinsurance year shall 

8 be 9.6 percent of retained premiums.’’; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (8), by striking subparagraph 

10 (F). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

General Dynamics ) 

) 

Under Contract No. N00024-01-C-8501 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60680 

D. Joe Smith, Esq. 

Matthew L. Haws, Esq. 

Edward Jackson, Esq. 

Grant B. Schweikert, Esq. 

Jenner & Block LLP 

Washington, DC 

Ronald J. Borra, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Robyn L. Hamady, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 25 April 2017 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60680, Appeal of General Dynamics, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31031]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: December 12, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

Closed Meeting

    The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet 
in closed session to review and discuss a number of issues relating to 
U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. They 
will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as 
well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options 
in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed 
because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be 
properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy 
under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would 
disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely 
to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. 
(5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will 
relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of 
the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) 
and (6)).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or Carol Booker 
at (202) 401-3736.

    Dated: December 1, 2000.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.

Certification

    Based on the information provided to me, the meeting scheduled by 
the Broadcasting Board of Governors for December 12, 2000, may be 
closed to the public pursuant to sections (c)(1), (2), (6), and 9(B) of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b.).
    Issues qualifying for closure of the meeting will be inextricably 
intertwined with issues which do not so qualify. During the course of 
the meeting there will be discussions relating to foreign policy 
options (c)(1), internal BBG or IBB personnel, budgetary, and 
organizational matters (c)(2), the performance or selection of 
personnel (c)(6), and options for negotiations or other sensitive 
discussions within the U.S. or abroad. (c)(9)(B).

Carol Booker,
BBG Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-31031 Filed 12-1-00; 2:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M