alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.03 RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gregg Buckbinder, Chief Financial and Operating Officer of Millburn
Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust
(the "Trust"), certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Millburn World
Resource Trust;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under whch such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and trust capital of the Trust as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

The Trust's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the Trust and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Trust, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Trust's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Trust's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Trust's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Trust's internal control over financial reporting; and

The Trust's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Trust's
auditors and the audit committee of the Trust's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Trust's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Trust's internal control over
financial reporting.


By: /s/ Gregg Buckbinder
------------------------
Gregg Buckbinder
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
August 15, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 1145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-310]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 20 
January 2000 at 10:00 AM in the Commission's offices at the National 
Building Museum (Pension Building), Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion will include 
designs for projects affecting the appearance of Washington, DC, 
including buildings and parks.
    Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or 
oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, 
Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. 
Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing 
impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the 
meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, December 28, 1999.
Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-310 Filed 1-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
From: Meehan, Clair

Subject: REMINDER - Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule - October 29 Public Meeting

Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:06:02 PM

Attachments: Logistics - WQS Reg Clarification Public Meeting 2013 10-17.pdf

WQS Reg Clarification Meeting - Agenda - FINAL.pdf

Supplemental-Information-Comparison-of-Existing-Rule-Language-and-Proposed-Rule-Language.pdf



# REMINDER

**Water Quality**  **Standards Regulatory** 

**Clarifications Proposed**  **Rule: Public**  **Meeting**

Thank you for registering for the public meeting on EPA’s Water Quality Standards

Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule. The meeting will be held **October 29,**  **2013,**

**10:00 a.m.–3:00**  **p.m. (Eastern)**  at the Smithsonian National Zoological Park’s Visitor

Center Auditorium, 3001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.

Attached, please find several items:

· The draft agenda for next week’s event

· A printable logistics sheet with directions to the meeting.

· A redline strikeout comparison of the existing regulatory language and proposed

rulemaking

Additional information about the proposed rulemaking is available on EPA’s website:

http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/wqs_index.cfm

.

**OTHER NOTES:** 

· On the day of the event, check-in will begin at 9:00 a.m.

· Please bring a writing utensil, as participants will be able to provide clarifying

questions to EPA in writing.

Clair Meehan | Environmental Scientist

clair.meehan@tetratech.com

Tetra Tech | Complex World, Clear Solutions

www.tetratech.com

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information.

Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from

your system.

### P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,530                   3,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,557                   9,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,332                     475
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,804,884                 918,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,090                  30,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,876,897                 985,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000                       0
<COMMON>                                           399                     263
<OTHER-SE>                                     755,647                 453,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,876,897                 985,269
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,893                  88,013
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,540                  62,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,841                  13,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,687                  26,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  8,908                     111
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,779                  26,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.18                    1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18                    1.07
        

</TABLE>
#### MIDLAND COUNTY v. TOLIVAR’S ESTATE.

No. 3551.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Nov. 23, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1939.

Merritt F. Hines, of Midland, and W. R. Blain and D. E. O’Fiel, both of Beaumont, for appellant.

Howth, Adams & Hart, and Lipscomb & Lipscomb, all of Beaumont, for appellees.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents only one point— the validity of an abstract of judgment lien, asserted by appellant against land claimed by certain of the appellees. The lower court held that the abstract of judgment plead by appellant was void and created no lien against the land in controversy. The judgment was correct, on the following fact conclusion filed by the trial court: “I find that although the judgment did not bear any interest, the Abstract of Judgment as prepared by the Clerk recited that it bore interest at the rate of Ten (10%) per cent per annum, and that the amount due thereon, was One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars, with Ten (10%) per cent interest and cost.” Arts. 5447 and 5448 and 5449, R.S. of Texas, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. arts. 5447-5449; McGlothlin v. Coody, Tex.Com.App., 59 S.W.2d 819, 821; Askey v. Power, Tex.Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 326, affirmed Tex.Com.App., 36 S.W.2d 446; 26 Tex.Juris. 362, Sec. 521, and cases cited; Magless v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 646, 18 S.W.2d 669; Noble v. Barner, 22 Tex.Civ.App. 357, 55 S.W. 382; Glasscock v. Stringer, Tex.Civ.App., 32 S.W. 920; Blankenship & Buchanan v. Herring, 62 Tex.Civ.App. 298, 132 S.W. 882; Anthony v. Taylor, 68 Tex. 403, 4 S.W. 531; Willis v. Sanger, 15 Tex.Civ.App. 655, 40 S.W. 229; Wicker v. Jenkins, 49 Tex.Civ.App. 366, 108 S.W. 188, 190.

The judgment of the lower court is in all things affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0455

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RONALD JOSEPH VALLIE JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 20, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2021

07/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0455
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of ActiveCore Technologies Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
              June 1, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Peter
              J.
              HamiltonPeter
                J. Hamilton
              Chief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.20

                   INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR FY 99
                          FOR EXECUTIVE LEVEL EMPLOYEES

Each executive will have the opportunity to earn incentive compensation as a
function of revenue and operating income attainment. The formula based program
will allow each participant to earn incentive compensation which ranges between
20-24% of base salary.

The incentive compensation is only payable upon the achievement of full year
objectives.

Incentive compensation under this program is based entirely on revenue growth
and bottom line performance. This type of sharp focus is essential in a
multi-divisional corporation, as it clearly communicates our corporate goals to
each executive.

Operating company executives will earn incentive compensation as a function of
their respective operating company's performance, not NumereX performance.
NumereX executives will be paid based on NumereX's overall performance.

The annual formula provides for no bonus payment until 87.5% of plan is
attained. From 87.5% to 100%, bonuses are also calculated in a linear fashion.
The formula-based approach allows for increased incentive compensation for over
achievement.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 1169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-309]



[[Page 1169]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-030-1430-ES; NVN 43262]


Notice of Realty Action; Termination of Recreation and Public 
Purposes Act Classification; Mineral County, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action terminates Recreation and Public Purposes (R&PP) 
Classification N 43262 in its entirety. The land will be opened to the 
public land laws, including the mining laws.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The land will be open to entry effective 10 a.m. on 
February 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles J. Kihm, Bureau of Land 
Management, Carson City Field Office, 5665 Morgan Mill Road, Carson 
City, Nevada 89701, 775-885-6000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority delegated by 
Appendix 1 of Bureau of Land Management Manual 1203 dated April 14, 
1987, R&PP Classification N 43262 is hereby terminated in its entirety 
on the following described public land:

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada

T. 8 N., R. 34 E.,
    Sec. 34, NW\1/4\NW\1/4\SW\1/4\.

    Containing 10.00 acres.

    The classification made pursuant to the Act of June 14, 1926, as 
amended (43 U.S.C. 869 et. seq.), segregated the public land from all 
other forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including 
location under the United States mining laws, but not leasing under the 
mineral leasing laws. The land was previously leased to Mineral County 
for a sanitary landfill. The lease has expired and the classification 
no longer serves any purpose.
    At 10 a.m. on February 7, 2000, the land will become open to the 
operation of the public land laws generally, subject to valid existing 
rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, and the requirements of 
applicable law. All valid applications received at or prior to 10 a.m. 
on February 7, 2000, shall be considered as simultaneously filed at 
that time. Those received thereafter shall be considered in the order 
of filing.
    At 10 a.m. on February 7, 2000, the land will also be open to 
location under the United States mining laws. Appropriation of lands 
under the general mining laws prior to the date and time of restoration 
is unauthorized. Any such attempted appropriation, including attempted 
adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 38, shall vest no rights against the 
United States. Acts required to establish a location and to initiate a 
right of possession are governed by State law where not in conflict 
with Federal law. The Bureau of Land Management will not intervene in 
disputes between rival locators over possessory rights since Congress 
has provided for such determination in local courts.

    Dated: December 23, 1999.
Carla James,
Acting Assistant Manager, Non-Renewable Resources.
[FR Doc. 00-309 Filed 1-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
#### WHITEHEAD v. HARGIS.

No. 3303.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

June 9, 1938.

Glenn Faver, of Jasper, for appellant.

Minton & Minton, of Hemphill, for ap-pellee.

O'QUINN, Justice.

An action in county court of Jasper County by appellee, W. B. Hargis, against appellant, J. F. Whitehead, for title and possession of certain cattle described in appellee’s petition, and in the alternative for their value.

On appellee’s petition and the undisputed evidence, he traded the cattle in issue to appellant for a certain mule, on representations that appellant owned the mule. In litigation, subsequent to the trade, it was found that appellant did not own the mule and that he had secured the title and possession of appellee’s cattle by false representations; under writ of possession under the judgment in that case the mule was-taken from appellee’s possession. On the undisputed facts the lower court correctly instructed a verdict in favor of appellee, and on the verdict judgment was correctly rendered in his favor.

•Thé judgment of the lower court is ini all things affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT JERRY L. GENT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 95-3006 THE DEPARTMENT FOR RIGHTS OF VIRGINIANS WITH DISABILITIES, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (MISC-95-14) Submitted: April 9, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996 Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Jerry L. Gent appeals the district court's order denying his petitionto proceed in forma pauperis. We vacate and remand with instructions. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis s hould be freely granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (1988). Cruz v. Hauck , 404 U.S. 59 (1971) (Douglas, J., concurring). The proper procedure is for the district court to consider only a petitioner's economic status in making the decision whether to file a pro se complaint in forma pauperis. Boyce v. Alizaduh , 595 F.2d 948, 950-51 (4th Cir. 1979). Once filed, the complaint may be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), if the complaint is patently frivolous or malicious. Here, the district court made no explicit findings with regard to whether Gent satisfied the poverty requirement to proceed in formapauperis and denied the petition based upon consideration of the merits of Gent's complaint. Upon review, however, Gent's declaration in support of his petition to pro ceed in forma pauperis would s upport a finding of indigency because it disclosed that he was not employed, received only $552 per month from Social Security Disability Insurance, and owned no cash, stocks, or bonds. We are not able to review the court's determination that the complaint was frivolous based onthe current record because the district court did not file Gent's complaint. Therefore, we find that the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and vacate the district court's order. Upon remand, the district court should grant Gent's petition to pro ceed in forma pauperis and file the complaint. Once the district court has docketed the complaint, it has broad discretion to dismiss it for frivolity under § 1915(d). Adams v. Rice , 40 F.3d 72 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 63 U.S.L.W. 3690 (U.S. Mar. 20, 1995) (No. 94-7733). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
2adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED 3
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1303

AN ACT

To designate the Federal Building and United

Courthouse’’.S. Fisher Federal Building and United StatesStreet in Trenton, New Jersey, as the ‘‘ClarksonStates Courthouse located at 402 East State
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1303

AN ACT

To designate the Federal Building and United States Courthouse located at 402 East State Street in Trenton, New

Jersey, as the ‘‘Clarkson S. Fisher Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Building and United States Courthouse

5 located at 402 East State Street in Trenton, New Jersey,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Clarkson S. Fisher

7 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

HR 1303 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 Building and United States Courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clarkson

6 S. Fisher Federal Building and United States Court7 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
S. 1668 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To rename a waterway in the State of New York as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. 

Channel’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOSEPH SANFORD JR. CHANNEL. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The waterway in the State of New York 

designated as the ‘‘Negro Bar Channel’’ shall be known and redesignated as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Channel’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the waterway referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Channel’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.