alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,003
<SECURITIES>                                    72,676
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (722)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,143
<PP&E>                                          15,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,757)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,389
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,534)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.29)


</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable B4soom Gil44 Co3inlasioner, General Land ofrioe huetin, Terse Dear &f-r.

Giles:

959, st 8rQ? o'alook d 4b mppliaatlon ir4m s4 an 4114 ad area or

& od Faith thir 

### cerise the 84~44are8 ute, whiah application bore the 

### r ths county Surveyor or Dural fylng th4t the same wa4 filed for Ecnsh.day or Septeabor, 1959, at
*,*Slnae the rtghta of the C&m& ?a'aith Olslmant and the Appliaant depend on t$4 tiPI of rlllng Ln two wi~dely clsparated o~ZL44 obaerrlrq3dimerent 4rri44 hour4, your ripinion la rcqaeetsd OA the r4zlarpingt questfoarw

### 705

Eon. Bascom Cllea,Page g

You then ask the followingqueationt "Under the teznls

Of House Bill 9, does an applioantwho rib0 in the orriae or tha County Surveyorat I:30 o*41ookA.M. September 30, 1939, bars priority 0~4r a Clod Faith Chinaantwho filed In the GeneralLand Oifi44 at St07 o*aloak**A.** M. September20, 19391' %ated in anotherway, you ask us whioh of the above referredto filings shall **be** consideredprior. Slnoe, tier Xoaae Bill 9, it 16 necessaryto determine whloh tiling ia prior before the respeptlvs **rightr** 

### or the applioantaad the good faith olaimanti aan be deterlained in the Btarmer

speoirledby House Bill 9, the makrlallt 8eotlon (f

f of the question is 4vfdent. Sse for exaaplo **and** Sootion (a) or House Bill 9, lu both or whlah aeatlonrrights are granted **to** good faith alalmamtu OOAtingsAt UpOA there having bO4A A0 prior rilim by an applicantto lease or purahase.

Eouse Bill 9 do46 not attempt to define 4r preaaribewhat shall oonatitutea *prior liling by an applieo.At". Me rind nothin& in Hoase Bill 9 nor in 

### any other law to indicatethat the ~glslature with raapeot to the aituatioaoutlinedby JQU pea, or haa intendedto make an exoeptionto the w4ll-4atabll4ha6 rule that priority in time gives priority .in right a8 betweenOOmpetlng applloantaeven though the ext.ent of enah priority be less than a full oalandtar day. In such oiroumstanota'we are, therafora,4ompelled to hold that the a~pl;oaAt,J. 8. BuC@; having riled his applicationto P4,846 4%~ hour4 and SY nfnptaa before the good faith aLeSnaY&,J48e C. Lopezi, riled hi6

### 5’06

Ron. Baacom Gilea, Page 3

epplioatlon to purohase, must be oonsldered at? a prior applioant K-ithinthe meaning of House Bill 9, and a8 auoh, 3. H. But8 ia entitle& to the rfghts afforded to a prior applloent by the hat. Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENESIL OF **TXXhS**

Assistant RElStbt
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick J. Pedonti, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Not Applicable;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

    Date: November 8, 2004              By:/s/ Patrick J. Pedonti

                                        Patrick J. Pedonti
                                        Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1585 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1585

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
  mileage rate deduction for charitable use of passenger automobiles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
  mileage rate deduction for charitable use of passenger automobiles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN STANDARD MILEAGE RATE EXPENSE DEDUCTION FOR 
              CHARITABLE USE OF PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard mileage rate for use of 
passenger automobile) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(i) Standard Mileage Rate for Use of Passenger Automobile.--
            ``(1) General rule.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
        for purposes of computing the deduction under this section for 
        use of a passenger automobile, the standard mileage rate shall 
        be 16 cents per mile.
            ``(2) Subsequent adjustments.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary adjusts the 
                business standard mileage rate for any period after 
                1993, the Secretary shall also adjust the standard 
                mileage rate set forth in paragraph (1). The adjustment 
                in the rate set forth in paragraph (1) shall be made in 
                a manner consistent with the adjustment to the business 
                standard mileage rate; except that only costs allowable 
                as a deduction under this section shall be taken into 
                account.
                    ``(B) Business standard mileage rate.--For purposes 
                of subparagraph (A), the term `business standard 
                mileage rate' means the standard mileage rate which may 
                be used in computing the deduction under section 162 
                for the use of a passenger automobile.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00819

- CR

BRIAN JASON WHITE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 199

- 80670

- 2013



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.
On October 1, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record had not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to
pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment for the reporter’s record; (3) LaTresta Ginyard is the court reporter who recorded the proceedings; and (4) Ms. Ginyard’s explanation for the delay in filing the record is the length of the trial and her
workload; Because Ms. Ginyard did not tender the record until November, 3, 2015, we DO

NOT ADOPT the finding that she would file the record by October 31, 2015.

We ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.
Appel lant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### Joe TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 21748.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct 15, 1941.

Tom M. Miller, of Graham, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of theft in the district court of Young County and assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his verified motion for permission to withdraw the appeal and the same is accordingly granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,034
<PP&E>                                           4,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,021
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,599)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,880
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,841
<CGS>                                            7,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,821
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                       172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (21)
<NET-INCOME>                                       844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Jeffrey G. Clevenger, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Minerals Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:



Date:
May 3, 2011

/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGER Jeffrey G. Clevenger President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of Peter Andrews, Respondent, v Evanthia Andrews, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, *inter alia,*for an order of protection, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Schindler, J.), dated March 22, 1989, which granted the petitioner husband an order of protection against his former wife for a period of one year.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order of protection granted to the petitioner husband has already expired, and there is no indication in the record that it has been extended. Since the rights of the parties will not be directly affected by a determination as to the propriety of this order, the appeal is dismissed as academic *(see, Matter*
      *445
      *of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707; *Matter of Gansburg v Gansburg,*127 AD2d 766). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Amendment 27 to Pension Plan


 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 EXECUTION COPY 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 27 
  
 TO THE 
  
 UPS
PENSION PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
(“UPS”) and its affiliated corporations established effective as of January 1, 1973, the UPS Pension Plan for the benefit of their eligible employees; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the UPS Pension Plan, as adopted and amended from time to time, was amended and restated in its entirety, effective
as of January 1, 1976, to comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the UPS Pension Plan has been amended on a number of occasions since January 1, 1976, the most recent being Amendment No. 26; and 
  
 WHEREAS, this amendment to the UPS Pension Plan is adopted to account for certain provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 by providing that the automatic cash-out provisions of the UPS Pension Plan are limited to vested accrued benefits, the present value of which is less than $1,000. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of Directors by
Section 10.1 of the Plan, the UPS Pension Plan is hereby further amended to reflect the following changes: 
  
 1. Section 4.13(a), In General, is hereby amended effective for benefits paid after March 1, 2005 by adding the following new sentence at the end of the very last paragraph in that Section to read as follows:

  
 Provided however, that if the Present Value of such benefit is $1,000 or
greater, no such payment shall be made after March 1, 2005. 
  
 2. Section
4.14(e)(1) is hereby amended effective for benefits paid after March 1, 2005 by adding the following new sentence at the very end of the very last paragraph in that Section to read as follows: 
  
 Provided however, that if the Present Value of such benefit is $1,000 or greater, no such
payment shall be made after March 1, 2005. 
  
 3. Section 4.11 of Benefit Schedule
K of Exhibit I is hereby amended effective for benefits paid after March 1, 2005 by adding the following new sentence immediately following the first sentence of the first paragraph of that Section to read as follows: 
  
 Provided however, that if the Present Value of such benefit is $1,000 or greater, no such
payment shall be made after March 1, 2005. 
  








 4. Except as otherwise provided, this amendment shall be effective as of March 1, 2005. 
  
 5. Except as amended herein, the UPS Pension Plan as in effect before this Amendment No. 27
shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned certify that United Parcel Service of America, Inc., based upon action by its Board of Directors on this 21st day of March, 2005, has caused this Amendment No. 27 to be adopted. 
  

					
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.

			
	/s/    ALLEN HILL        	 	 	 	/s/    MICHAEL L. ESKEW        
	 Allen Hill
 Secretary
	 	 	 	 Michael L. Eskew
 Chairman
ACTIVECORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                      (FORMERLY IVP TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION)
            NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                 FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ActiveCore Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned herby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of the Company, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date:    August 12, 2005                By:  /s/ Efrem Ainsley
                                           ---------------------------
                                             Efrem Ainsley
                                             Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ActiveCore Technologies,
Inc. formerly IVP Technology Corporation and will be retained by ActiveCore
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

                                       52
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.  2-10-292-CR

GUILLERMO CASTELLON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant Guillermo Castellon pleaded true to a motion to revoke his probated sentence for driving while intoxicated.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (Vernon 2003).  The trial court sentenced Appellant on June 18, 2010, to seven years’ confinement.  The trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal states that this is “a plea-bargained case and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”  Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 19, 2010.  Concerned that we did not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we sent a letter to Appellant’s retained counsel requesting a response by August 2, 2010, showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received a response.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  September 9, 2010
POINT ALTITUDE

TIMELINEZULUON DECK 00-02 0 FORMAT

OFF DECK 03-08 0.1 QUALITY TOTAL 09-14 0.2 MODE

15-20 0.3 RATE STOP 21-26 0.4 VIDEO START 27-32 0.5 SHUTTER TAKE OFF TOTAL 33-38 0.6 FOCAL PT LAND 39-44 0.7 ZOOM DEBRIEF 45-50 0.8 RANGE 51-56 0.9 COLOR 57-62 1 BRIGHT

Project Form Date: 15 FEB 2015 BEARING TO MISSION AIRSPACE CONTROLER TRANSIT ALTITUDE MISSION ALTITUDE RETURN ALTITUDE TAKE OFF ALTITUDE RANGE TO MISSION

N N N E E E

BATTERY/FUEL LONG Weather Brief: Maintenance Issues: LAT

SHOW TIMEN

N N N N E E E

FLIGHT E PROJECT:

BRIEF TIME IN PLACE E NOTES Approval Documents: NOTAMS - Permission - Risk Assessment - COA - Project Concept - Flight Log PHOTO/VIDEO MINUTES CAMERA