alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1997 INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
THE  SCHEDULE IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            59,971,000
<SECURITIES>                                      23,083,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     103,000
<PP&E>                                                41,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (39,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   138,133,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,053,000
<BONDS>                                          190,690,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             109,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (54,719,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     138,133,000
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      7,628,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2,473,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                19,644,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (26,970,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (26,970,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (26,970,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (1.67)<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (1.67)<F1><F2>

<FN>
<F1>RESTATED FOR A 3-FOR-2 STOCK SPLIT BY WAY OF STOCK DIVIDEND TO BE PAID ON
      APRIL 14, 1998.
<F2>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
      STANDARDS NO.128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN>

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund Plus
(the "Fund") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                        /s/Gary Mentesana
                                     --------------------------------------
                                         Gary Mentesana
                                         Principal Executive Officer and
                                         Principal Financial Officer
                                         Arch Street VIII, Inc., as
                                         Managing General Partner of
                                         Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund Plus,
                                         A Limited Partnership


                                           Date:  July 16, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### E. W. LOWRIMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 21169.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

Thomas & Thomas, of Big Spring, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*1040KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is embezzlement. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04101]


The Garden Grow Co., Lilly Miller Packet Seed Division, 
Wilsonville, OR; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application 
for Reconsideration

    By application dated November 2, 2000, the petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding worker eligibility to apply for NAFTA-
Transitional Adjustment Assistance. The denial notice was signed on 
October 6, 2000 and published in the Federal Register on November 1, 
2000 (65 FR 65331).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The petitioner requested that the Department reassess the findings 
that The Garden Company has not shifted production to Canada, nor has 
the Division of Lilly Miller. No new information concerning the 
decision was provided by the petitioner for reconsideration.
    The Department's denial of NAFTA-TAA was based on the findings that 
creiteria (3) and (4) of the group eligibility requirements of 
paragraph (a)(1) of section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, 
were not met. Findings of the investigation showed that workers of The 
Garden Grow Company, Lilly Miller Packet Seed Division, Wilsonville, 
Oregon packaged seed in paper envelopes. The Department's denial of 
NAFTA-TAA for workers of the subject firm was based on the finding that 
there was no shift of production from the Wilsonville, Oregon 
production facility to Mexico or Canada. Sales and production were 
relatively flat. The workers were separated because the subject 
division was sold to a competitor who is shifting the work to another 
domestic location.
    Although, the company has shifted some production (plastic seed 
bottle production) to Canada, no shifts in production have occurred 
during the relevant period.

Conclusion

    After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of November 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-31037 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, David Yntema, CFO of Packeteer, Inc., certify that:I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Packeteer, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors: (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated:  October 31, 2006 /s/ David Yntema   David Yntema   Chief Financial Officer
IK-IS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 02-14-00043-CR OFFENSE: 22.011

Johnathan Lewis Helm v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 4

DATE: 06/04/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1276053D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Johnathan Lewis Helm v. Tl

STYLE: ofTexas

he State

Petition

cca# 79a mtS

appellant's CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

^&Fl^&J> JUDGE:

DATE: OHl/^/j-O/SJUDGE: 1/jA (JaA^L^

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant To


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Deep Well Oil & Gas, Inc. (“the
Company“) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Mr.
Curtis James Sparrow, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
                    
                    November
      23, 2009By:
                    
                    /s/ Curtis James SparrowCurtis
      James SparrowChief
      Financial
Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2155

ORLANDO IRA BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior 

District Judge. (3:13-cv-02983-MBS)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and 

dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint 

against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C. 

Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas H. Reslewic,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ Thomas H. Reslewic
----------------------
Thomas H. Reslewic
Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 369 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1668 

[Report No. 115–221] 

To rename a waterway in the State of New York as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford 

Jr. Channel’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2017 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

APRIL 9, 2018 

Reported by Mr. THUNE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To rename a waterway in the State of New York as the 

‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Channel’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOSEPH SANFORD JR. CHANNEL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The waterway in the State of New 

5 York designated as the ‘‘Negro Bar Channel’’ shall be 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1668 RS

1 known and redesignated as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Chan2 nel’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the waterway referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. 

7 Channel’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 369 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1668 

[Report No. 115–221] 

A BILL 

To rename a waterway in the State of New York 

as the ‘‘Joseph Sanford Jr. Channel’’. 

APRIL 9, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### BASTIAN BROS. CO. v. McGOWAN, Collector of Internal Revenue.

No. 376.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 11, 1940.

Remington & Remington, of Rochester, N.Y. (Albert S. Willey, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Arthur. L. Jacobs, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and George L. Grobe, U. S. Atty., and Joseph J. Doran, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Buffalo, N. Y., for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

By this action the plaintiff seeks to recover *sums*paid as surtaxes on undisfributed profits for the years 1936 and 1937. Its complaint was dismissed as stating no cause of action. The question presented is whether a corporation whose capital has been so impaired by operating losses in prior years that in the tax years in question it is forbidden by the statutes of the state of its incorporation to declare a dividend, is entitled to a credit under section 26(c) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 49 Stat. 1648, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev. Acts, page 836, in the calculation of taxes on undistributed profits. More precisely the issue is whether the New York statutes forbidding the declaration or payment of dividends while capital is impaired may be deemed to fall within the language of said section 26(c) (1) as “a provision of a written contract executed by the corporation prior to May 1, 1936, which provision expressly deals with the payment of dividends.” Both the text and the legislative history of the section support the decision of the district judge and we are content to affirm the judgment upon his opinion. See D.C., 32 F.Supp. 93. He followed Crane-Johnson Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 105 F.2d 740, certiorari granted 309 U.S. 692, 60 S.Ct. 708, 84 L.Ed. -. Subsequently the ninth circuit decided by a divided court in favor of the taxpayer. Northwest Rolling Mills, Inc., v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 286. We agree with the former decision.

Judgment affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1484

Making appropriations for the House of Representative’s Official Mail Cost

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994 and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1993

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

Making appropriations for the House of Representative’s

Official Mail Cost for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994 and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the following sums are appropriated, out of any

4 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the

5 Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September

6 30, 1994, and for other purposes, namely,

7 OFFICIAL MAIL COSTS

8 For expenses necessary for official mail costs of the

9 House of Representatives, $11,927,750, as authorized by

10 law.
2

HR 1484 IH

Æ
exv10w43



 






EXHIBIT 10.43




TERMINATION AGREEMENT




     This Termination Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 31st
day of March, 2005 (“Effective Date”), by and between AESP, Inc., f/k/a Advanced Electronic Support
Products, Inc. (“AESP”), a Florida corporation, and Slav Stein (“Stein”).



     WHEREAS, AESP and Stein are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated February 19,
1997 (“Employment Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, AESP and Stein have agreed that the Employment Agreement shall be terminated
effective as of the Effective Date; and



     WHEREAS, notwithstanding the termination of the Employment Agreement, Stein shall continue as
an at-will employee of AESP following the Effective Date.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto agree as follows:




	1.  	The Employment Agreement is hereby terminated, effective as of the Effective Date. As of such
date, the parties hereby release each other from any and all obligations under the Employment
Agreement.
	 
	2.  	Notwithstanding the termination of the Employment Agreement pursuant to this Agreement,
following the Effective Date Stein shall continue to serve as an at-will employee of AESP. In
that regard, and subject to such future determinations with respect to Stein’s compensation as
may be made by the Board of Directors of AESP, Stein shall continue to earn his current annual
base salary of $198,000 per annum, shall continue to receive an automobile allowance of $500
per month and shall continue to participate in the benefit plans of the Company in which he
currently participates. Further, notwithstanding the termination of the Employment Agreement,
Stein shall continue to hold the Company stock options that he currently holds, all in
accordance with the terms of the agreements with respect to such options.
	 
	3.  	Notwithstanding the termination of the Employment Agreement pursuant to this Agreement,
following the Effective Date, AESP shall continue to indemnify Stein with respect to his
actions as an officer and director of AESP to the fullest extent provided by law, as more
particularly set forth in AESP’s articles of incorporation and by-laws.
	 
	4.  	This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties in respect of its subject
matter and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings (oral or written) between or
among the parties with respect to such subject matter.
	 
	5.  	The rights and obligations of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the
parties and their respective successors and assigns.




 









 











     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above
written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Slav Stein
	 	 	 
	 	 	Slav Stein
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AESP, INC., a Florida corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	BY:
	 	/s/ John F. Wilkens
	

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name (print): John F. Wilkens
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer