alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1037 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a 

five-year pilot project to test the feasibility and advisability of expanding the scope of certain qualifying workstudy activities under title 38, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1037 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pilot College Work 

3 Study Programs for Veterans Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR PILOT PROGRAM FOR ON-CAMPUS 

5 WORK-STUDY POSITIONS. 

6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PILOT PROGRAM.—The Sec7 retary of Veterans Affairs shall conduct a five-year pilot 

8 project to test the feasibility and advisability of expanding 

9 the scope of qualifying work-study activities for purposes 

10 of section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, in11 cluding work-study positions available on site at edu12 cational institutions. 

13 (b) TYPE OF WORK-STUDY POSITIONS.—The work14 study positions referred to in subsection (a) may include 

15 positions in academic departments (including positions as 

16 tutors or research, teaching, and lab assistants) and in 

17 student services (including positions in career centers and 

18 financial aid, campus orientation, cashiers, admissions, 

19 records, and registration offices). 

20 (c) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall issue regula21 tions to carry out the pilot project under this section, in22 cluding regulations providing for the supervision of work23 study positions referred to in subsection (a) by appropriate 

24 personnel of the Department. 

25 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

26 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary 
3 

•HR 1037 EH

1 $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 

2 to carry out the pilot project under this section. 

3 (e) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding any other 

4 provision of law, this section shall not be carried out with 

5 any funds provided for or under any authority of the Re6 adjustment benefits program described by the list of Ap7 propriated Entitlements and Mandatories for Fiscal Year 

8 1997 contained in the Conference Report to accompany 

9 H.R. 2015 of the 105th Congress, the Balanced Budget 

10 Act of 1997 (H. Report 105–217). No funds shall be obli11 gated for the purpose of carrying out this section except 

12 discretionary funds appropriated specifically for the pur13 pose of carrying out this section in appropriation Acts en14 acted after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1037 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conUnited States Code. qualifying work-study activities under title 38, and advisability of expanding the scope of certain duct a five-year pilot project to test the feasibility
#### PETROLEUM PRODUCERS CO. et al. v. REED et al.

No. 2331—7557.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

Nov. 13, 1940.

Perkins & Floyd, of Alice, and Kilgore & Rogers, of Wichita Falls, for plaintiffs in error.

Chas. L. Black, of Austin, amicus curiae.

Daniel B. Purvis, of Alice, for defendants in error.

*541HARVEY, Commissioner.

This is a suit, in the statutory form of trespass to try title, instituted by the Petroleum Producers Company and the United Producers Company, as plaintiffs, to recover the title to and possession of the oil and gas leasehold estate in and to a certain tract of land in Duval County. The defendants in the suit are M. H. Reed, Ralph R. Ogden, Daniel B. Purvis, and R. R. Stolley. The defendants Reed, Ogden and Purvis filed a plea in abatement of the suit. The abatement is sought because the State of Texas is not a party to the suit— the said defendants claiming that the State is an indispensable party. As basis for their claim that the State is an indispensable party, said defendants allege in their said plea, substantially, that said tract of land, in its entirety, is vacant, unsurveyed school land belonging to the State, and that said defendants hold the oil and gas leasehold estate in a designated portion of said tract under an oil and gas lease duly executed by the Commissioner of the General Land Office according to law. Upon due' hearing of said plea in abatement and the evidence introduced at such hearing, the trial court sustained the plea and entered judgment dismissing the suit. The plaintiffs appealed from this judgment and same was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 122 S.W.2d 1116. The plaintiffs have been granted the writ of error.

As we have seen, the said defendants claim the oil and gas leasehold estate in a portion of said tract of land, under an oil and gas lease executed by the State. In other words, according to the claim of said defendants, whatever rights which accrued to them, under said lease, belong to them and not to the State. It is thus seen that the 'possession which the plaintiffs challenge is in no sense and in no respect the possession of the State, but is that of the defendants themselves. The very crux of the question which the plaintiffs propose, in their petition, to litigate is whether, as. against the defendants in the suit, the plaintiffs have the right to the possession of the oil and gas leasehold estate for which they sue. Undoubtedly, the plaintiffs are privileged to litigate this question with the defendants in the absence' of the State. Short v. W. T. Carter & Bro., 133 Tex. 202, 126 S.W.2d 953.

From what has been said, the conclusion follows that the State is not an indispensable party to this suit, and that the trial court erred m sustaining the plea in abatement and entering judgment dismissing the suit. The judgment of the trial court, and that of the Court of Civil Appeals, are therefore reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2


March 15, 2005


Joseph A. García

14021 SW 67 Ct.

Miami, FL 33158


Dear Joseph A. García:


Pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. 1999 Stock Option
Plan (the “Plan”), and/or your Employment Agreement, if
applicable, you have been granted a Nonqualified Stock Option, to
purchase 25,000 shares (the “Option”) of Class A
common stock as outlined below.







	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Granted To:	 	Joseph A. García
	 
	Grant Date:	 	March 7, 2005
	 
	Options Granted:	 	25,000
	 
	Option Price per Share:	 	$10.79	 	Total Cost to Exercise:	 	$269,750.00
	 
	Expiration Date:	 	March 7, 2015, unless
terminated earlier.
	 
	Vesting Schedule:	 	50% immediately, 50% first yr as
follows:
	 
	 	 	12,500 on 03/07/2005
	 	 	12,500 on 03/07/2006
	 
	Transferability:	 	Not transferable except in
accordance with the Plan.







	 	 	 
	 	Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Raúl
Alarcón, Jr.
	 	 	Raúl
Alarcón, Jr.





By my signature below, I
hereby acknowledge receipt of this Option granted on the date shown
above, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions of
the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and
agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and
the Plan.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature: 	/s/ Joseph A. García	 	Date: 	3/15/05
	 	Joseph A. García	 	 	 





 

 



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SBS TOWER	 	2601 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, PENTHOUSE II
COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA 33133	 	TEL (305) 441-6901	 	FAX (305) 446-5148
No. 95-3132

Orlando Briscoe, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * James Anthony Gammon, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

Submitted: February 16, 1996 Filed: March 12, 1996
Before LOKEN, BRIGHT, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. In 1990, Orlando Briscoe was convict ed in state court in Missouri of three felonies. He did not appeal, but he did p etition for postconviction relief in the Missouri courts. In State v. Briscoe , 847 S.W.2d 792 (Mo. 1993) ( en banc ), his petition for postconviction relief was denied.

Mr. Briscoe subsequently petitioned for habeas corpus relief i n federal district cour t. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied Mr. Briscoe's petition in mid-1995; he appealed. We have read the briefs, examined the exhibits, considered the district court record, and heard ora l argument by the parties. We

### The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United State s 1 

### District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Lewis M. Blanton , Un ited States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District o f Missouri. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

-2- discern no error of l aw in the district court record and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 1

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts.

# ACTION:

Notification of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals leading to one (1) award of a Cooperative Agreement to conduct a Study of the Feasibility for the Creation of Loan Funds for Nonprofit Arts Organizations. The study will include a quantitative and descriptive analysis of loan funds for arts organizations as well as the guarantee of loans made to non-profit                               ( print page 71336)                            arts organizations; the identification and analysis of the obstacles and opportunities for such financing mechanisms; and the feasibility of new structures or the adaptation of existing structures for such purposes. The recipient of the Cooperative Agreement will also determine the appropriate amount of the fund corpus needed and estimate the associated administrative costs. Completion of the study is contemplated in six months. Those interested in receiving the Solicitation package should reference Program Solicitation PS 01-01 in their written request and include two (2) self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the Solicitation will not be honored. It is anticipated that the Program Solicitation will also be posted on the Endowment's Web site at http://www.arts.gov.                    

# DATES:

Programs Solicitation PS 01-01 is scheduled for release approximately December 28, 2000 with proposals due on January 29, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to the National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Hummel, Grants & Contracts Office, National Endowment for the Arts, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20506 (202/682-5482).

William I. Hummel,

Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements.

[FR Doc. 00-30511 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,555,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,853,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,600,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          46,008,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            46,598,000
<LOANS>                                        192,924,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,114,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,581,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     246,628,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,343,000
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         4,822,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,177,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 272,581,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,333,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  549,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   205,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,087,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,937,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       1
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,149,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,151,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,144,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,144,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       827,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.13
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,393,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                       314,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,958,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       76,000
<RECOVERIES>                                        22,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,114,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,114,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 390

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating September 17, 1994, as ‘‘Constitution Day’’.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States is the cornerstone of the Nation’s system of government under law;

Whereas the Constitution of the United States signifies the

importance of the rule of law and affirms the Nation’s

dedication to the principles of freedom and justice;

Whereas the Constitution of the United States is recognized

by many to be the most significant and important document in history for establishing freedom and justice

through democracy;

Whereas the Constitution of the United States provides the

framework of the Nation’s law, spirit, and beliefs;
2

HJ 390 EH

Whereas the Constitution of the United States deserves the

recognition, respect, and reverence of all Americans;

Whereas every American should celebrate the freedom and responsibilities of the Constitution of the United States;

and

Whereas the Constitution of the United States was signed on

September 17, 1787: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 17, 1994, is designated as ‘‘Constitution

4 Day’’, and the President is authorized and requested to

5 issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and

7 activities.

Passed the House of Representatives August 5,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 390

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating September 17, 1994, as ‘‘Constitution

Day’’.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1157 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1157

To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish certain protections 
     for preference eligibles selected for involuntary geographic 
                             reassignment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2009

 Ms. Herseth Sandlin introduced the following bill; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish certain protections 
     for preference eligibles selected for involuntary geographic 
                             reassignment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Reassignment Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS FOR PREFERENCE ELIGIBLES SELECTED FOR INVOLUNTARY 
              GEOGRAPHIC REASSIGNMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 3502 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g)(1) A preference eligible may not be involuntarily separated 
for failing to accept a directed reassignment to a position outside the 
commuting area of the preference eligible concerned or to accompany a 
position outside of such area pursuant to a transfer of function unless 
such preference eligible--
            ``(A) receives written notice of the reassignment (together 
        with notice of the rights afforded by subparagraph (B) and 
        paragraph (2)) at least 30 days before the effective date of 
        the reassignment; and
            ``(B) is allowed to elect to have the selection of 
        employees for release conducted in the same manner as would be 
        required under subsection (a) in the case of a reduction in 
        force.
    ``(2) A preference eligible involuntarily separated in the 
circumstances described in paragraph (1) (in the matter before 
subparagraph (A) thereof) is entitled to appeal to the Merit Systems 
Protection Board under section 7701 any failure to comply with the 
requirements of this subsection.
    ``(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term `preference 
eligible' includes a preference eligible serving in or under the United 
States Postal Service.''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--The first sentence of section 3501(b) of 
such title is amended by striking ``and section 3504'' and inserting 
``, section 3502(g)(3), and section 3504''.
                                 <all>
```
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 16, 2007*

#### KIMBERLY ANN KENT VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-06-250)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when her 2002 Dodge Neon struck a hole while she was traveling on Wilsonburg Road in *28HarrisonLEVIT County. Wilsonburg Road is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to make an award in this claim for the reasons more folly stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred between 6:00 p.m. and 6:15 p.m. on August 15, 2006. Wilsonburg Road is a two-lane highway at the area of the incident involved in this claim. Claimant testified that she was driving on Wilsonburg Road when she saw the hole. She stated that she could not avoid the hole because of oncoming traffic. Claimant’s vehicle struck the hole sustaining damage to the right front rim and tire. Ms. Kent stated that the hole was approximately eight feet long and twelve inches deep. Claimant’s vehicle sustained damage totaling $242.20.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Wilsonburg Road at the site of the claimant’s accident for the date in question. Respondent did not present any witnesses or evidence at the hearing of this matter.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins vs. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645; 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman vs. Dept. of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had at least constructive notice of the hole which claimant’s vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. Photographs in evidence depict the hole and provide the Court an accurate portrayal of the size and location of the hole on Wilsonburg Road. The size of the hole and the time of the year in which claimant’s incident occurred leads the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this hazardous condition and respondent had an adequate amount of time to take corrective action. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent and claimant may make a recovery for the damage to her vehicle.

In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimant in this claim in the amount of $242.20.

Award of $242.20.