alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, November 30, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. time has been changed to Thursday, November 30, 2000 at 10:30 a.m.

Commissioner Carey, as duty officer, determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Dated: November 28, 2000.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30763 Filed 11-29-00; 11:17 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Foundation (NSF) announces that the following advisory committee, established pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Public Law 92-463, as amended), completed its work and issued its final report on October 31, 2000. As this committee was established under the auspices of the interagency Subcommittee on Global Change Research (SGCR), see 63 Fed. Reg. 9267 (Feb. 24, 1998), its final report (which followed a 6-day public comment period) was provided to the SGCR Chair and a copy sent to the NSF.

*Name:*                     U.S. National Assessment Synthesis Team (#5219).                

*Availability of Report:*                     The report is viewable and downloadable on the Worldwide Web at www.gcrio.org/​NationalAssessment/​. Publication is in progress and information on ordering a copy of the report is also provided on the Website. The report is also available for public inspection and use at the Library of Congress in accordance with section 13 of the FACA.                

*Contact Person:*                     Tom Spence, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 705, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8500.                

Dated: November 27, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-30576 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
### StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: I

‐ 540, Western Wake Freeway, Apex, NC

Owner: NCDOT/NC Turnpike Authority

Contractor: Raleigh Durham Road Builders

, Cary, NC

Product: StormKlear DPS

‐ MB Kits

Dose Rate: 5 mg/L

Description: This is a new roadway that will extend approximately 12.6 miles from NC 55 at SR1172 (Old

Smithfield Road) to NC 55 near SR1630 (Alston Avenue) in Wake County. Total construction cost is

estimated to be $784M. Given the native soils and amount of exposed area, the challenge was to see

how much StormKlear MB Kits could drop the turbidity of the runoff; samples were taken during a 1”

over 6 hours rain event. The Kits were installed in dry form directly on top of 4’ single net excelsior

matting just upstream of a skimmer basin; 12” x 10’ excelsior logs were used as check structures. The

DBP

‐ 2100 was installed before the 1 st check, and the GelFloc before the 2 nd ; the 3 rd section was for

settling and additional filtration.

Results – Influent: 3787 NTU, After 3 rd Check: 297 NTU, Basin: 1.4 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          29,217
<SECURITIES>                                       343
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                       149
<INVENTORY>                                        148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,520
<PP&E>                                         329,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                 267,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,983
<BONDS>                                        165,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        171
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                   (115,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,358
<SALES>                                         39,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,300
<CGS>                                            8,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,909)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,024
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
#### Pincus Wolfson et al., Appellants, v Kasa Lithuanian Federal Credit Union, Respondent. (And Another Action.)

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Finger-hood, J.), entered July 6, 1989, dismissing the complaint and granting judgment in favor of defendant against plaintiffs in the sum of $49,874.23, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs commenced this action, claiming that the moneys held by defendant’s attorney in escrow, in connection with a loan, had never accrued to plaintiffs’ benefit, and that by demanding repayment of the entire principal and interest, the loan was usurious and void. At a bench trial, conflicting testimony was received with respect to payment of the proceeds. Defendant’s attorney testified that $250,000 was disbursed from the escrow for the benefit of the equitable borrower to satisfy mortgages and allow him to clear title to an oil terminal and convey it to a third party as well as to release one of the mortgaged condominium units from a prior lien and provide defendant with a second lien thereon. The court found that the moneys had been disbursed, dismissed the complaint and granted defendant judgment for counsel fees pursuant to the mortgages.

In reviewing the decision of the court in a bench trial, this court must weigh the relative probative force of conflicting testimony and the conflicting inferences drawn therefrom and may render whatever judgment it finds warranted by the facts. *(Northern Westchester Professional Park Assocs. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492.) Here, the court’s decision that plaintiffs failed to sustain their burden of proof that the loans were usurious is based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence, and the factual findings based upon the credibility of the witnesses should not be disturbed. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
Flint Creek Environmental Controls Costs

10/21/11 - Rev.4

Technology $/kw Total Direct Capital 1 SCR 1.1 Capital

Installed $230 1 $121.4 $/Year $/Year Catalyst Replacement (levalized per year) $1.5 2 $1.5

1.2 O&M

Variable Urea $2.20 $2.2 Fixed Operating Labor Cost $0.53 3

Maintenance Labor $0.53 4 Maintenance Material $0.50 5 Total Fixed O&M $1.56 $1.6 Notes: A - Cost are in $MM

B - Capital costs are "all-in" direct cost. Indirect - OH, AFUDC, etc. are not included. 1 - Interpolation between $203/kw for Roclport and $234/kw for CV 6 2 - levalized cost based on 50% of estimated recurr ing Rockport replacement costs 3 - 1 person per shift 5 shifts 4 - 1 person per shift 5 shifts 5 - Base on O&M study information from Arsenal HillPlant SCR
**Exhibit 31.1** **Certification    of Chief Executive Officer**     I, Eric M. Westbury, Chief Executive Officer of SBM Certificate    Company, certify that::     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of SBM Certificate Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      /s/  Eric    M. Westbury
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1524 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1524

 To make Members of Congress ineligible to participate in the Federal 
                     Employees' Retirement System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 1993

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make Members of Congress ineligible to participate in the Federal 
                     Employees' Retirement System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN FERS.

    (a) In General.--Except as otherwise provided in this section, 
effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, a Member of 
Congress shall be ineligible to participate in the Federal Employees' 
Retirement System.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any 
individual who, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, satisfies 
the requirements of section 8410 of title 5, United States Code, for 
being considered eligible for an annuity under subchapter II of chapter 
84 of such title.
    (c) Refunds of Contributions.--
            (1) In general.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall prevent 
        appropriate refunds from being made, in accordance with 
        applicable provisions of law, on account of an individual's 
        becoming ineligible to participate in the Federal Employees' 
        Retirement System as a result of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Special rule.--For purposes of making any refunds in 
        accordance with paragraph (1), a Member who becomes ineligible 
        to participate in the Federal Employees' Retirement System as a 
        result of the enactment of this Act shall be treated in the 
        same way as if separated from service.
    (d) Annuitants Not Affected.--Subsection (a) shall not be 
considered to apply with respect to--
            (1) any former Member of Congress who, as of the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, is entitled (or would on proper 
        application be entitled) to an annuity computed, in whole or in 
        part, by reference to section 8415 of title 5, United States 
        Code; or
            (2) any individual who, as of the date of the enactment of 
        this Act, is entitled (or would on proper application be 
        entitled) to an annuity as a survivor of a former Member of 
        Congress.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the terms ``Member of Congress'' and 
``Member'' have the same meaning as the term ``Member'' under section 
8401(20) of title 5, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
March 9 , 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 14423 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket

No. FAA

- 2015

- 5256

- 0001

. Dear Sir or Madam;

Skylevin LLC seeks to amend the original 333 exemption # 14423 as follows:

1. Update the current 333 exemption to reflect the current issuance which includes removal o f
Closed Set Restrictions
2. Give authorization for all approved UAS/UAV Aircraft

T here has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

1) Permit closed

- set filming for the motion picture and television industry

Skylevin LLC was issued an Exemption numbered 14423 (hereinafter the Exemption) without the purpose of conducting scripted, closed

- set filming for the motion picture and television i ndustry. Skylevin LLC herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow operations for the purpose of conducting scripted, closed

- set filming for the motion picture and television industry and additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that full y complies with the conditions of the Exemption.

2) Additional aircraft

Skylevin LLC wishes to operate at will all aircraft currently listed as approved. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemp tion of 14423.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely yours,

Steven Murray,

Member SkyLevin LLC
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Titanium  Metals  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we,
Steven L. Watson,  Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  and Bobby D. O'Brien,  Executive  Vice  President and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
          operations of the Company.




August 4, 2006



/s/ Steven L. Watson
------------------------------------------------------
Steven L. Watson
Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Bobby D. O'Brien
------------------------------------------------------
Bobby D. O'Brien
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Note:     The  certification  the  registrant  furnishes  in this exhibit is not
          deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934, as amended,  or otherwise  subject to the  liabilities of
          that Section.  Registration  Statements or other  documents filed with
          the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  shall not  incorporate  this
          exhibit by  reference,  except as otherwise  expressly  stated in such
          filing.
Debtor:   ____________________

Secured Party: Titanium Metals Corporation

                           EXHIBIT "A"

                    Description of Collateral


          All of the Debtor's right, title and interest in and to the following
property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired by the Debtor and whether now
existing or hereafter coming into existence:

          (a)  all of the shares of capital stock or other securities of  the
Issuer (as defined below) represented by the respective certificates identified
in Schedule 1 attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, together
with in each case the certificates representing the same (collectively, the
"Pledged Securities"); and

          (b)  all shares, securities, moneys or property representing a
dividend on, or a distribution or return of capital in respect of any of the
Pledged Securities, resulting from a split-up, revisions, reclassification or
other like change of any of the Pledged Securities or otherwise received in
exchange for any of the Pledged Securities and all Equity Rights (as defined
below) issued to the holders of, or otherwise in respect of, any of the Pledged
Securities (collectively, together with the Pledged Securities, the "Pledged
Collateral"); and

          (c)  all proceeds in whatever form of all or any part of the Pledged
Securities  and Pledged Collateral.
<PAGE>


          For the purposes hereof, the following terms shall have the meanings
set forth below:

          "Equity Rights" shall mean, with respect to any person, any
outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants, commitments, preemptive rights or
agreements of any kind (including any stockholders' or voting trust agreements)
for the issuance, sale, registration or voting of, or outstanding securities
convertible into, any additional shares of capital stock of any class, or
partnership or other ownership interests of any type in, such person.

          "Issuer" shall mean Titanium Metals Corporation and/or TIMET Capital
Trust I.


Debtor:   ____________________


<PAGE>

Secured Party: Titanium Metals Corporation

                            SCHEDULE 1



Capital Stock:



Other Securities:


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50105 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FELIPE MAYNEZ-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CR-483

- - - - - - - - - - November 24, 1997 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Felipe Maynez-Esparza (“Maynez”) appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952(a) and 960(a)(1). Maynez argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s finding that he knowingly possessed and imported marijuana. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and conclude that the record is sufficient toNo. 97-50105 -2- support the jury’s finding that Maynez knowingly imported and possessed marijuana with intent to distribute. See United States v. Diaz-Carreon , 915 F.2d 951, 953 (5th Cir. 1990) Maynez also argues that the district court erred in giving the jury a deliberate ignorance instruction. Based on Maynez’s defense of a lack of guilty knowledge and the evidence adduced at trial, the district court did not err in its instruction. See United States v. McKinney , 53 F.3d 664, 676 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.