alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael A. Sicuro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|/s/ Michael A. Sicuro                                                                                          
|Michael A. Sicuro Chief Financial Officer of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc.  November 6, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# AGENCY:

Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, December 7, 2000, 2 p.m.

# LOCATION:

Room 410, East-West Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

                        Closed to the Public—Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(f)(1) and 16 CFR 1013.4(b) (3), (7), (9), and (10) and submitted to the                         **Federal Register**                         pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).                    

# Matter to be Considered:

## Compliance Status Report

The staff will brief the Commission on the status of various compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-0709.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 

Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the Secretary, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207, (301) 504-0800.

Dated: November 28, 2000.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30691 Filed 11-28-00; 2:48 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
Exhibit 15

                          Accountants' Acknowledgement

Footstar, Inc.
Mahwah, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:  Registration Statement Number 33-20731 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated April 17, 1997 related to our review of
interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick

New York, New York
May 12, 1997
#### GANN et ux. v. HOPKINS, Judge, et al.

No. 13380.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

July 9, 1938.

S. D. Hopkins, of Corpus Christi, for relators.

John C. North, of Corpus Christi, and Raymond Edwards, of San Antonio> for respondents.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

On March 22, 1938, judgment by default was rendered against some of the defendants in cause No. 1S049-A, M. C. Gann et ux. v. Mrs. P. W. Putman et al., being an action in trespass to try title pending in the District Court of the 28th Judicial District in and for Nueces County.

Thereafter, on April 18, 1938, and at the -same term of court, said defendants filed their motion to set aside said judgment and for new trial, and, still at the same term, on May *7,*1938, after a hearing, the trial judge granted said motion, set aside said judgment as to all parties, and ordered a new trial.

The plaintiffs below have presented to this Court their motion for leave to file petition for mandamus to require Honorable W. B. Hopkins, Judge of said Court, to vacate and set aside said order of May 7, 1938, in whole, or, in the alternative, in part, and to proceed to again render judgment by default against said defendants, as before.

*111It is true, as a matter of course, that the trial judge retained control over said judgment throughout the term at which it was rendered, and had the power, in his discretion, to set aside said judgment, upon his own motion or that of any party, and with, or without, express cause. That being the rule, and the judgment in question having been set aside and new trial granted, ^at the same term at which it was rendered, this Court has no power, nor has it the-inclination, to require the trial judge to rescind his order granting a new trial, and now again render the judgment he had previously set aside.

The court having set aside the previous judgment, it is presumed the court will proceed to a new trial in due course, .and unless he is requested thereto, and refuses to proceed to trial in a seasonable time, mandamus does not lie to require him to act.

Relators’ motion for leave to file is denied.
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1088 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

one-year period for the training of new disabled veterans’ 

outreach program specialists and local veterans’ employment representatives by National Veterans’ Employment 

and Training Services Institute. 
2 

•HR 1088 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mandatory Veteran 

5 Specialist Training Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ONE-YEAR PERIOD FOR TRAINING OF NEW DIS7 ABLED VETERANS’ OUTREACH PROGRAM 

8 SPECIALISTS AND LOCAL VETERANS’ EM9 PLOYMENT REPRESENTATIVES BY NATIONAL 

10 VETERANS’ EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING 

11 SERVICES INSTITUTE. 

12 (a) ONE-YEAR PERIOD.—Section 4102A(c)(8)(A) of 

13 title 38, United States Code is amended by striking 

14 ‘‘three-year period’’ and inserting ‘‘one-year period’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

16 (1) APPLICABILITY TO NEW EMPLOYEES.—The 

17 amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with 

18 respect to a State employee assigned to perform the 

19 duties of a disabled veterans’ outreach program spe20 cialist or a local veterans’ employment representative 

21 under chapter 41 of such title who is so assigned on 

22 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (2) APPLICABILITY TO PREVIOUSLY-HIRED EM24 PLOYEES.—In the case of such a State employee 

25 who is so assigned on or after January 1, 2006, and 
3 

•HR 1088 EH

1 before the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

2 Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall require the State 

3 to require, as a condition of a grant or contract 

4 under which funds are made available to the State 

5 in order to carry out section 4103A or 4104 of title 

6 38, United States Code, each such employee to satis7 factorily complete the training described in section 

8 4102A(c)(8)(A) of such title by not later than the 

9 date that is one year after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 19, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1088 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide 

Services Institute. National Veterans’ Employment and Training local veterans’ employment representatives by abled veterans’ outreach program specialists and for a one-year period for the training of new dis-
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Source-Interlink Companies,
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leslie Flegel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Leslie Flegel

Leslie Flegel
Chief Executive Officer
September 15, 2003

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Source-Interlink Companies,
Incorporated and will be retained by Source-Interlink Companies, Incorporated
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 382 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 382

  Designating September 11, 1994, as ``National Neonatal Nurses Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1994

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Ms. Waters, Mrs. Mink, 
Mr. Walsh, Mr. LaFalce, Mrs. Meek, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Flake, Mr. Emerson, 
    Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Klein, Mr. Scott, Mr. 
  Hilliard, Mr. Pete Geren of Texas, Mr. Blackwell, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
  Fingerhut, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. Dellums) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office 
                         and and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating September 11, 1994, as ``National Neonatal Nurses Day''.

Whereas neonatal nursing has made remarkable progress in infant health care 
        during the past 25 years;
Whereas neonatal nurses serve the needs of many people and function as central 
        figures in the coordination of care among individuals such as the sick 
        newborn, the parents, the physicians, and all other allied health 
        professionals;
Whereas the capabilities of neonatal nurses have expanded to acquire special 
        expertise and sophistication in caring for newborns;
Whereas advanced practice in neonatal nursing has led to the development of the 
        neonatal nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, transport nurse, 
        case manager, discharge planner, staff educator, parent educator, unit 
        administrator, clinic manager, and follow-up care coordinator;
Whereas the National Association of Neonatal Nurses was established to serve the 
        professional growth and education needs of neonatal nurses nationwide;
Whereas the National Association of Neonatal Nurses has held its annual meeting 
        on or about September 11 since 1984; and
Whereas recognition is due to all of the neonatal nurses in the Nation who give 
        their care, time, and expertise to the benefit of mankind, thus 
        preserving life through quality health care: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That September 11, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Neonatal Nurses Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate 
programs, ceremonies, and activities.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1591 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1591

  Relating to the tariff treatment of 1,6-hexamethylene diiosocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 1993

 Mr. Archer (for himself and Mr. DeLay) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Relating to the tariff treatment of 1,6-hexamethylene diiosocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,6-HEXAMETHYLENE DIIOSOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 29 is amended by inserting in numerical 
sequence the following new subheading, with the article description 
having the same degree of indentation as the article description in 
subheading 2929.10.20

      

       ``  2929.10.25     1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate.  7.9%             Free (CA, E,     15.4 cents/kg+5    
                                                                             IL) 2.8% (CA)    2%                
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Application.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law to 
the contrary, upon a request filed with the appropriate customs officer 
before the 90th day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any 
entry of withdrawal from warehouse for consumption--
            (1) which was made after December 31, 1992 and before the 
        15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been a lower 
        duty if the amendment made by section 1 applied to such entry 
        or withdrawal;
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amendment applied to 
such entry or withdrawal.

                                 <all>
```
----

----

|   | In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Eagle International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, Amendment No. 2 for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry C. Turner, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |     (1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |     (2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Date: September 13, 2011 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |  /s/ Terry C. TurnerTerry C. TurnerPrincipal Executive Officer |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Titanium
Metals Corporation's Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months
ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011657
<NAME> TITANIUM METALS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,102
<INVENTORY>                                    212,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365,041
<PP&E>                                         420,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 913,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,917
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          201,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       348,287
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   913,361
<SALES>                                        134,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,493
<CGS>                                          122,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (642)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,896)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 20576.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

W. J. Oxford, Jr., of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary of a private residence, his punishment being assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment appears to be in proper form. ( The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

MBNA CORPORATION

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely in connection with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code, Failure of corporate officers to certify financial reports, and is not
being filed as part of MBNA Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002 accompanying this certification.

I, M. Scot Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of MBNA Corporation, certify that
MBNA Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of MBNA Corporation.

| |                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ M. Scot Kaufman
M. Scot Kaufman
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MBNA Corporation and will be retained by MBNA Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk REVISED JANUARY 26, 2007 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40472 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GILBERTO GARCIA-LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-1019-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gilberto GarciaLozano raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense; by United States v. Garcia-Mendez , 420 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 1398 (2006), which held that a Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation was equivalent to burglary of a dwelling; and by United States v.No. 06-40472 -2- Carmichael , 343 F.3d 756, 761-62 (5th Cir. 2003), which held that a challenge to the district court's order requiring the defendant to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release is not ripe for review on direct appeal. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.