alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1678 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1678

  To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve 
 access to grants and loans for evidence-based substance use disorder 
       treatment services in rural areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2017

  Mr. Donnelly (for himself and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve 
 access to grants and loans for evidence-based substance use disorder 
       treatment services in rural areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIRECT LOANS AND GRANTS.

    Section 306(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act 
(7 U.S.C. 1926(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(27) Direct loans and grants for substance use disorder 
        treatment services.--
                    ``(A) Selection priority.--In selecting recipients 
                of loans or grants (not including loans guaranteed by 
                the Secretary) for the development of essential 
                community facilities under this section, the Secretary 
                shall give priority to entities eligible for those 
                loans or grants--
                            ``(i) to develop facilities to provide 
                        substance use disorder (including opioid 
                        substance use disorder)--
                                    ``(I) prevention services;
                                    ``(II) treatment services;
                                    ``(III) recovery services; or
                                    ``(IV) any combination of those 
                                services; and
                            ``(ii) that employ staff that have 
                        appropriate expertise and training in how to 
                        identify and treat individuals with substance 
                        use disorders.
                    ``(B) Use of funds.--An eligible entity described 
                in subparagraph (A) that receives a loan or grant 
                described in that subparagraph may use the loan or 
                grant funds for the development of telemedicine 
                facilities and systems to provide telemedicine for 
                substance use disorder treatment.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### RILEY v. STATE.

No. 19905.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 9, 1938.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Feb. 8, 1939.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 1939.

J. B. Clegg, of Trinity (Warren W. Moore, of Austin, of counsel) for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the theft of one head of cattle, and sentenced to serve two years in the penitentiary therefor.

We find from the record that the notice of appeal to this court does not show to have been entered in the minutes of the trial court. It is necessary that such notice of appeal be passed into the minutes of said court, and such be shown in the record. This appeal will, therefore, be dismissed.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The record having been perfected, the appeal will be reinstated and the case considered on its merits.

It appears from the record that notice of appeal was given on March 24, 1938. The statement of facts accompanying the transcript was filed on June 30, 1938, which was 98 days after notice of appeal. Thus, the filing was too late. Under the terms of Art. 760, C.C.P., the state-’ ment of facts must be filed within 90 days from the date notice of appeal is given.

In the absence of the statement of facts and bills of exception, nothing is presented for review which would authorize this court in interfering with the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, James F. Lynch,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofSITEL Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 9, 2004 | */s/  James F. Lynch*      |
|------------------------|----------------------------|
|                   | **James  F. Lynch**        |
|                   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Leroy Ragsdale, Appellant, v Dominic J. Mantello, as Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme *926Court properly dismissed the petition for habeas corpus relief. Petitioner argued that his parole was revoked illegally because it was inappropriate for the Board of Parole to rely solely on the Hearing Officer’s report and recommendation without reviewing the verbatim record of the revocation hearing. There is no such requirement in State law or regulation and due process of law does not mandate such review *(see, Morrissey v Brewer,*408 US 471; *Yaretsky v Blum,*629 F2d 817 [2d Cir], *revd on other grounds*457 US 991; *Matter of Melvin v Kelly,*126 AD2d 956, *lv denied*69 NY2d 609; *cf., People ex rel. Knowles v Smith,*54 NY2d 259, 266). All that is required is that the Board’s decision to revoke parole "be based upon the hearing officer’s finding of fact and recommendation and such other information as the panel may deem necessary” (9 NYCRR 8005.20 [d]). That was done here *(see, People ex rel. Smith v Mantello,*167 AD2d 912). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.—habeas corpus.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43416-43417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17974]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ITS Industry Forum on Connected Vehicles: Moving From Research 
Towards Implementation; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, Research and Innovative Technology 
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent 
Transportation System Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) will host a free 
public meeting and webinar to provide updates and promote a lively 
discussion on the Connected Vehicle Safety, Vehicle-to-Infrastructure, 
and Testing programs; along with a special session discussing lessons 
learned in deploying ITS. The public meeting will take place September 
25-27, 2012, 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. at the Hyatt Regency Chicago, 151 East 
Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60601, 312-565-1234. Persons 
planning to attend the meeting or participate in the webinar should 
register online at www.itsa.org/safetymeeting no later than August 30, 
2012.
    The goal of the meeting and webinar is to identify where we are and 
what remains in getting to the 2013 decision on Vehicle Communications 
for Safety, discuss what is evolving in terms of a robust Vehicle-to-
Infrastructure environment, and identify what we have learned from past 
ITS deployments that can help with success for the future.

About the Connected Vehicle Research Program at USDOT

    Connected Vehicle research at USDOT is a multimodal program that 
involves using wireless communication between vehicles, infrastructure, 
and personal communications devices to

[[Page 43417]]

improve safety, mobility, and environmental sustainability. To learn 
more about the Connected Vehicle program please visit www.its.dot.gov.
    If you have any questions or you need any special accommodations, 
please contact Adam Hopps at Ahopps@itsa.org or 202-680-0091.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 18th day of July 2012.
John Augustine,
Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2012-17974 Filed 7-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
```
```
EXHIBIT 31-1CERTIFICATIONSI, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., certify that:1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V, L.P., SERIES 32.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have: (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect in the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.              Date:    January 08, 2010 /s/  Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                               EXHIBIT 10(m)(2)


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                        ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

The Administrative Services Agreement ("Agreement") as entered into on May 29,
1998 between Transamerica Life Insurance and Annuity Company, ("Transamerica"),
a North Carolina corporation, and Legacy Marketing Group, ("LMG"), a California
corporation, is hereby amended, effective May 29, 1998, as follows:

ADD TO 3. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION:

        3.1

                (f)     In addition to the foregoing, LMG shall indemnify and
                        hold harmless Transamerica from and against any tax,
                        interest or penalties imposed by the IRS or any state or
                        local taxing authority on Transamerica, as well as any
                        liability Transamerica may incur to Policyholders caused
                        by or relating to LMG's failure to properly apply the
                        rules under IRC Section 72, or its failure to: (i)
                        deposit the correct amount of income tax withholding on
                        time; (ii) issue timely information returns; (iii)
                        correctly process tax related transactions related to
                        non-resident aliens; and (iv) correctly process tax
                        related transactions related to death claims.

ADD TO 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS:

        7.17    Section 9.2 shall also be deemed to survive the termination of
                this Agreement.


The parties agree as above.


LEGACY MARKETING GROUP


By /s/ R. PRESTON PITTS
  ------------------------------------

Title President
     ---------------------------------

Date  6/9/98
    ----------------------------------


TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY


By /s/ WILLIAM N. SCOTT
  ------------------------------------

Title Vice President
     ---------------------------------

Date  June 3, 1998
    ----------------------------------
**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting, November 13, 2013**

**Attendance List**

4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3295; Amendment #1]

In accordance with information received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated November 9, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damage caused by this disaster from November 13, 2000 to November 30, 2000. 

All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for filing applications for economic injury is June 14, 2001. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.) 
      ( print page 70865)    
Dated: November 20, 2000.

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-30263 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contais summary financial information extracted from InControl
Inc's 1996 10-K Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000871629
<NAME> INCONTROL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,288
<SECURITIES>                                    32,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                      311
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,044
<PP&E>                                          11,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,472
<BONDS>                                          1,419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       129,238
<OTHER-SE>                                    (88,212)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,917
<SALES>                                            306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   306
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,264
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                (28,267)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,267)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.77)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Howard, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered on March 31, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 Vi to 19 Vi years, unanimously affirmed.

*293We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 10.16


                                  FIRST AMENDMENT
                                         TO
                              ACTIVE VOICE CORPORATION
                               1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN


     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is adopted effective as of June 22, 1998 (the
"Amendment Date"), by ACTIVE VOICE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation (the
"Company").


                                      RECITALS


     A.   The Company has adopted the Active Voice Corporation 1998 Stock Option
Plan (the "Plan").


     B.   The Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.


     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


     1.   The definition of "Applicable Percentage" in Article 2 of the
     Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety.


     2.   Section 6.1 of the Plan is amended by deleting the following phrase
     therefrom:


     (i) the Committee shall not grant an Option if, following the grant of
     the Option, the Applicable Percentage would exceed twenty-two percent
     (22%), and (ii)


     3.   Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and
     effect.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed as of the
Amendment Date.


                                        ACTIVE VOICE CORPORATION


                                     By /s/ Robert L. Richmond
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. Richmond
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer