alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

WINSTON J. CRADDOCK

NO. 2021 KW 1526

JANUARY 31, 2022

In Re: Winston J. Craddock, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, 

No. 326, 256. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. Ramos v. Louisiana, U. S. , 140 S. Ct. 

1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 ( 2020) does not apply retroactively to

relator whose conviction and sentence were final at the time the

decision was rendered. See also State v. Kelly, 2021- 00572 ( La. 

9/ 27/ 21), 324 So. 3d 79 ( per curiam). Accordingly, the district

court did not err by denying the application for postconviction

relief. 

JMM

WIL

EW

COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DF.PuT1 CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            9024
<SECURITIES>                                     44705
<RECEIVABLES>                                    41683
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1974
<INVENTORY>                                        522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 97906
<PP&E>                                           19178
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  121092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            28179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         52493
<OTHER-SE>                                       35660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    121092
<SALES>                                          28671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28671
<CGS>                                             5038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4215
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2625
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2625
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
*Exhibit 10.5*
**Executive Non-Compete Agreement**
The following is a list of executive officers who have entered into an Executive Non-CompeteAgreement in the form attached as Exhibit 10 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,1999. The number of shares of restricted stock issued under Section 4 of the agreement is asfollows:     Executive Officers Shares*     Gregg Bacchieri  78,772 Louis J. Freeh  0 Charles C. Krulak  0 John W. Scheflen  66,960 Richard K. Struthers  78,772 Kenneth A. Vecchione  55,140 
*Share numbers reflect stock splits.
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Numerex Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stratton J.
Nicolaides, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates
and periods covered by the Report.
  This certificate is being furnished
solely pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed,
distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically
required by law.
  March
      17, 2008
              /s/ ­­­­_Stratton J.
      Nicolaides_____Stratton
      J. NicolaidesChief
      Executive Officer
#### SHOTWELL v. STATE.

No. 19829.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1938.

W. L. Ward, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin,, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of an automobile is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error has been perceived or pointed out justifying a reversal of the conviction..

The judgment is affirmed-.

On Motion for Rehearing.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant insists that the record presents fundamental error in that the verdict the court received was signed by M. R. Smith, as foreman, while the verdict set forth in the judgment of the court bears the signature of M. R. Nash. *>*It is recited in the judgment that “M. R. Smith and eleven others were duly selected, impanelled and sworn.” It is manifest that the error was clerical and occurred in carrying the verdict into the judgment of the court. We therefore reform the judgment in order that it may reflect the verdict signed by M. R. Smith, as foreman of the jury.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has beep examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals ^.nd approved by'the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,028,712
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,845,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,834,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,845,450
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (67,406)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (367,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee*: National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.                    

*Date*: December 4, 2000.                    

*Time*: 12:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda*: To update the DCLG on the “CARRA” program and to follow-up on the priorities Dr. Klausner identified during his October presentation.                    

*Place*: National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 300C, Room 3068 A, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person*: Elaine Lee, Acting Executive Secretary, Office of Liaison Activities, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 300 C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/594-3194.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 21, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-30458 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
SYNERGY BRANDS INC.
                                STATE OF DELAWARE
                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

Synergy Brands Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

1. The name of the corporation is Synergy Brands Inc.

2. That a Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation  was filed by
the  Secretary  of  State of  Delaware  on  February  11,  2003  and  that  said
Certificate  requires  correction  as  permitted  by Section  103 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

3. The inaccuracy or defect of said Certificate to be corrected is as follows:

The Amendment correctly stated the reverse split of the outstanding stock of the
corporation 1 share for each 4 shares outstanding but neglected to also disclose
and  implement  a  similar  1 for 4  reverse  split of the  amount  of stock the
corporation is authorized to issue

4. Article FOURTH of the Certificate is corrected to read as follows:

Add (iii) The amount of shares the  corporation  is  authorized to issue is also
reverse  split one for four  resulting in the  corporation  being  authorized to
issue  15,000,000  shares of stock divided into  14,000,000  common shares,  par
value  $.001 per share,  100,000  shares of Class A Preferred  stock,  par value
$.001 per share,  and 900,000 shares of Class B Preferred Stock, par value $.001
per share.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by
Mair Faibish, an Authorized Officer, this day of January, A.D. 2005.

By:
-------------------------------
Name:   Mair  Faibish
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131649 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131649 COA: 269768 Ingham CC: 05-000241-FC LITTLETOM ALLEN PETERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 24, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
B1

B2

B6

B3

B4

B4.1

B7

B8

B9

B5

B10
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 29, 2000.
    Time: 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Natcher Building, Room 1AS19, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Arthur L. Zachary, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, NIGMS, Natcher Building, 
Room 1AS-19, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2886.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 17, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30177 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 30 5 . DAVI D YOUNG v . STATE OF GEORGI A

.
Dav i d Yo u n g ap p eal s to t h i s Co u rt fro m th e tri al co u rt ’ s D ecem b er 1 5 , 2 0 1 6

o rd er d en y i n g h i s m o t i o n t o s et as i d e t h e d is m i s s a l o f h i s h ab eas co rp us p et i t i o n. Ho wev er, t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e j u ri s d i ct i o n o v er a l l c a s es i nv o l v i n g h ab eas co rp us

. See G a. Co ns t

. 1 9 8 3 , A r t

. V I , Sec. VI, Par. III (4 ). Th is ap p eal i s t h erefo re TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s it io n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 07, 2017

04/07/2017
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 75158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30580]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. 97C-0415]


Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Luminescent 
Zinc Sulfide; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of August 8, 2000 (65 FR 
48375). This document amended the color additive regulations to provide 
for the safe use of luminescent zinc sulfide as a color additive in 
certain externally applied cosmetics. In amending the color additive 
regulations, the document inadvertently omitted a phrase from the 
codified. This document corrects that error.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  This rule is effective December 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aydin Oearstan, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3076.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 00-19952, appearing on page 48377 
in the Federal Register of August 8, 2000, the following correction is 
made:


Sec. 73.2995  [Corrected]

    1. On page 48377, in the second column, in Sec. 73.2995 Luminescent 
zinc sulfide, in paragraph (c), beginning in the fifth line, the phrase 
``(included under Sec. 720.4(c)(7)(ix) and (c)(8)(v) of this chapter) 
subject'' is corrected to read ``and nail polish included under 
Sec. 720.4(c)(7)(ix) and (c)(8)(v) of this chapter, respectively,''.

    Dated: November 21, 2000.
L. Robert Lake,
Director of Regulations and Policy, Center for Food Safety and Applied 
Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 00-30580 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
A01A0653.

#### PALMER v. THE STATE.

(547 SE2d 404)

Phipps, Judge.

Malcolm Palmer was convicted of the sale and possession of cocaine. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for the sale of cocaine, arguing that no sale occurred. He claims that the arresting officers had no authority to arrest him and that, as a result, the possession conviction must also be reversed. We find the evidence was sufficient to support Palmer’s conviction for the sale of cocaine and affirm.

On the evening of August 24, 1999, Gwinnett County Police Officers Prieto, Lockhard and Fulcher were working undercover and attempting to buy crack cocaine from street dealers in the vicinity of the Guest House Inn. When the officers saw Palmer walking down the street, Lockhard stopped the car and Prieto asked Palmer if he had a “50” (a $50 piece of crack cocaine). Palmer testified that he told Prieto that he knew someone down the street who would probably sell it to them. The officers gave Palmer a ride to the Home Town Inn, gave him $50 and watched him go into the building. When Palmer returned, he told the officers that his source had only $40 worth of crack cocaine. He handed Prieto the drugs and gave him back $10. When Palmer asked if they had a shooter (a crack pipe), the officers placed him under arrest. Prieto patted Palmer down and discovered a small quantity of crack cocaine in his pocket. Palmer testified that his source had given it to him when he bought the cocaine for the officers.

Palmer’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence must fail. The officers asked Palmer for $50 worth of crack cocaine; Palmer took their money and delivered the drugs to them. Thus, a drug sale was consummated between Palmer and the officers.1

Given our holding that a sale of drugs did occur, for which the officers were authorized to arrest Palmer, we need not address Palmer’s challenge to his possession conviction on the ground that the officers had no authority to arrest him.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Smith, P. J., and Barnes, J., concur.*

*26Decided April 4, 2001.

*Sharon L. Hopkins,*for appellant.

*Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, R. Keith Miles, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

1

*Lawrence v. State,*227 Ga. App. 70, 72 (3) (487 SE2d 608) (1997); see *Robinson v. State,*164 Ga. App. 652, 653-654 (1) (297 SE2d 751) (1982) (a sale of drugs is complete when the seller delivers the drugs to the feigned buyer); see also *Clay v. State,*232 Ga. App. 541 (1) (502 SE2d 267) (1998).