alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|In connection with the Quarterly Report of Packeteer, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
David Yntema, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                     |  |     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2003 |  | /s/ |  | DAVID YNTEMA                        
|                     |  |     |  |                                     
|                     |  |     |  | David Yntema
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3293
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           394
<OTHER-SE>                                        2193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3293
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  3851
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3675)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3851)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)
        

</TABLE>
#### COLLINS v. STATE.

No. 21246.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

Walter S. Hart, of Houston, for appellant.

*944Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft from the person.. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

In the motion for a new trial appellant complains of certain rulings of the court with respect to the introduction of evidence and other matters occurring upon the trial. However, in the absence of the evidence which was before the court, we are unable to appraise the matters complained of in said motion.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-1996
<CASH>                                         176,866
<SECURITIES>                                   7,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,865,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                   196,836
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,483,961
<PP&E>                                         1,709,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,132,833)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,479,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,177,530
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    56
<COMMON>                                       70,314
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,077,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,479,189
<SALES>                                        4,858,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,858,689
<CGS>                                          3,667,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,230,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             202,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,319,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   476,217
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (843,129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (843,129)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.13)
        


</TABLE>
#### SKAGGS v. STATE.

No. 20194.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 11, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1939.

Wallace Hughston, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property; punishment is assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters seem to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
Skip to main content


NCD.gov
      
      
      -A +ASearch form
    SearchFollow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter About UsNewsroomNewsroom HomeTestimony & SpeechesNewsletterFunding OpportunitiesProgress ReportsPublicationsResourcesFAQsMeeting & EventsOther Events30 on ADA 30NCD policy briefings to Congressional staff on AbilityOne ReportAccountabilityBuy American Act ReportsGovernment Performance and Results Act ReportsCongressional Budget Justification ReportsFinancial Audit ReportsNCD Strategic PlanNCD Annual Employee SurveyNCD BylawsNo Fear ActFOIAFOIA e-LibraryAnnual ReportsQuarterly ReportsChief FOIA Officer ReportsMake a FOIA RequestReference GuideNCD FOIA RegulationEquity
 Preview NCD's New NCD.gov Website in Beta
  
  Take a look at the new beta site, an early, in-progress version at beta.NCD.gov
          Page not foundSkip to Page ContentThe requested page "/rawmedia_repository/FY2008_GPRA.pdf" could not be found. NCD Policy Areas
  
  CRPDCivil RightsCultural DiversityEducationEmergency ManagementEmploymentFinancial Assistance & IncentivesHealth CareHousingInternationalLong Term Services & SupportTechnologyTransportationYouth Perspectives Contact Us
  
  If you have a question or comment, please let us know.
202-272-2004 (voice)
202-272-2022 (Fax)   Email NCD   Language Access Needs? Stay Connected with NCD
  
  Subscribe to NCD Updates   Newsroom   Join us on Facebook   Follow us on Twitter   Follow us on Instagram   Subscribe to our YouTube Channel   Follow us on LinkedIn   Meetings and Events   Link to Us   NCD Council & Staff
Employment Opportunities
 **National Council on Disability**   1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850   Washington, DC 20004
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1357 

To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey the former Navy Extremely 

Low Frequency communications project site in Republic, Michigan, to 

Humboldt Township in Marquette County, Michigan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2009 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey the former 

Navy Extremely Low Frequency communications project 

site in Republic, Michigan, to Humboldt Township in 

Marquette County, Michigan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER NAVY EX4 TREMELY LOW FREQUENCY COMMUNICA5 TIONS PROJECT SITE, REPUBLIC, MICHIGAN. 

6 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

7 the Navy may convey, without consideration, to Humboldt 

8 Township in Marquette County, Michigan, all right, title, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1357 IH

1 and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of 

2 real property, including any improvements thereon, in Re3 public, Michigan, consisting of approximately 7 acres and 

4 formerly used as an Extremely Low Frequency commu5 nications project site. 

6 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 

7 and legal description of the real property to be conveyed 

8 under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satis9 factory to the Secretary. 

10 (c) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

11 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi12 tions in connection with the conveyance under subsection 

13 (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 

14 interests of the United States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1309 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1309

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 relating to the minimum 
  wage and overtime exemption for employees subject to certain leave 
                               policies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1993

 Mr. Andrews of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. Petri) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 relating to the minimum 
  wage and overtime exemption for employees subject to certain leave 
                               policies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Workplace Leave Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LEAVE POLICIES.

    Section 13(a)(1) (29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1)) is amended by adding before 
the semicolon at the end the following: ``and an employee shall not be 
disqualified for an exemption under this paragraph on the basis that 
such employee is subject to reductions--
            ``(A) in accrued leave of any type, or
            ``(B) in pay because of an absence of the employee and 
        because--
                    ``(i) such employee's accrued leave was exhausted, 
                or
                    ``(ii) such employee chose to be absent without 
                charging the employee's accrued leave
regardless of the length of the leave or absence for which such 
reductions are to be made''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall apply to an employee 
(described in the amendment) before, on, and after the date of 
enactment of this Act unless--
            (1) an action was brought in a court involving the 
        application of section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act 
        of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1)) to the employee; and
            (2) a final judgment has been entered in the action on or 
        before the date of enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1371

To provide for additional extension periods, not exceeding 2 years in the

aggregate, in the time allowed for reexportation of certain goods admitted

temporarily free of duty under bond.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for additional extension periods, not exceeding

2 years in the aggregate, in the time allowed for

reexportation of certain goods admitted temporarily free

of duty under bond.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REEXPORTATION OF COMMUNICATIONS SAT4 ELLITE ARTICLES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) The first sentence of U.S.

6 Note 1(a) to subchapter XIII of chapter 98 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amend8 ed—
2

•HR 1371 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘and (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(2)’’;

2 and

3 (B) by striking the period at the end and in4 serting the following: ‘‘, and (3) for articles imported

5 under heading 9813.00.05, the time for exportation

6 may be extended for 1 or more further periods

7 which, when added to the initial 1 year, shall not ex8 ceed a total of 5 years, but any application for an

9 extension beyond the 3rd year must be accompanied

10 by the importer’s certification that the articles are

11 dedicated for incorporation into a communications

12 satellite.’’.

13 (2) The amendments made by subsection (a) apply

14 with respect to goods entered on or after the date that

15 is 3 years before the date of the enactment of this Act.

16 (b) EXPEDITED MITIGATION OF PENALTY ASSESS17 MENTS ON REEXPORTATIONS DELAYED BY LAUNCH SYS18 TEM FAILURES.—Goods imported under heading

19 9813.00.05 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

20 United States after January 1, 1983, and before the effec21 tive date established under subsection (a)(2) that are cer22 tified by the importer—

23 (1) as having been dedicated for incorporation

24 into a communications satellite; and
3

•HR 1371 IH

1 (2) as not having been exported within the time

2 required for exportation under the applicable bond

3 directly or indirectly as a result of launch schedule

4 delays resulting from any launch failure, launch sys5 tem failure, or technical delay;

6 are subject to liquidated damages not exceeding 1 percent

7 of the liquidated damages established in the applicable

8 bond.

Æ
#### MILLER v. STATE.

No. 20720.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1940.

H. G. Woodruff, of Decatur, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public highway while intoxicated; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the •offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial of his case. . The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error having been presented, the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1269 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1269

     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
     jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2009

 Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Carter, Mr. Akin, Mr. Hall of 
Texas, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Paul, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Alexander, 
Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Graves, Mr. Linder, and Mr. Poe of Texas) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
     jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marriage Protection Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction
    ``No court created by Act of Congress shall have any jurisdiction, 
and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to hear or 
decide any question pertaining to the interpretation of, or the 
validity under the Constitution of, section 1738C of this section.''.
    (b) Amendments to the Table of Sections.--The table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new item:

``1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### HARPER v. STATE.

No. 20790.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 31, 1940.

W. S. Moore, of Gainesville, for appellant.

Lloyd W, Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 2 years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear, to be in due and proper order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### MILES v. STATE.

No. 21063.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 22, 1940.

Ratliff & Worrell, of Colorado City, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft from the person; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appeal bond is not approved. In referring to an appeal bond in a felony case, Art. 818, C.C.P., reads, in part, as follows: “Before such bail bond shall be accepted and the defendant released from custody'by reason thereof, the same must be approved by such sheriff and the court trying said cause, or his successor in office.”

The bond is also defective in failing to require the appellant to appear before the trial court “from day to day and from term to term of the same, and not depart therefrom without leave of this court, in order to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas.” See Article 817, C.C.P.

Appellant being enlarged under an appeal bond which fails to bear the approval of the sheriff and trial judge, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1324

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the rules relating to crediting

of third-party reimbursements received by the United States for the

costs of medical services and hospital care furnished by the Department

of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1991

Mr. PENNY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the rules

relating to crediting of third-party reimbursements received by the United States for the costs of medical

services and hospital care furnished by the Department

of Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CREDITING OF THIRD-PARTY PAYMENTS RE4 CEIVED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF5 FAIRS.

6 Paragraph (4) of section 1729(g) of title 38, United

7 States Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 1324 IH

1 ‘‘(4) The unobligated balance remaining in the Fund

2 at the close of business on September 30 of any fiscal year

3 which is in excess of any part of such balance that the

4 Secretary determines is necessary in order to enable the

5 Secretary to defray, during the next fiscal year, the ex6 penses, payments, and costs described in paragraph (3)

7 shall, not later than January 1 of the next fiscal year,

8 be allocated as follows:

9 ‘‘(A) One-third shall be deposited in the Nurs10 ing Home Revolving Fund.

11 ‘‘(B) Two-thirds shall be deposited to the credit

12 of appropriations available for the operation of De13 partment medical centers, to be allocated to each

14 medical center in proportion to the amounts credited

15 to the Fund during the previous fiscal year that

16 were attributable to care and services furnished

17 through each such medical center.’’.

Æ
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03586

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.