Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Proposed Rules 75221

local governments, or EPA consults with

State and local officials early in the

process of developing the proposed

regulation. EPA also may not issue a

regulation that has federalism

implications and that preempts State

law, unless the Agency consults with

State and local officials early in the

process of developing the proposed

regulation.

This proposed rule does not have

federalism implications. It will not have

substantial direct effects on the States,

on the relationship between the national

government and the States, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132. Thus, the

requirements of section 6 of the

Executive Order do not apply to this

rule.

XII. Executive Order 13084

What Is Executive Order 13084 and Is It

Applicable to This Proposed Rule?

Under Executive Order 13084, EPA

may not issue a regulation that is not

required by statute, that significantly or

uniquely affects the communities of

Indian tribal governments, and that

imposes substantial direct compliance

costs on those communities, unless the

Federal government provides the funds

necessary to pay the direct compliance

costs incurred by the tribal

governments, or EPA consults with

those governments. If EPA complies by

consulting, Executive Order 13084

requires EPA to provide to the Office of

Management and Budget, in a separately

identified section of the preamble to the

rule, a description of the extent of EPA’s

prior consultation with representatives

of affected tribal governments, a

summary of the nature of their concerns,

and a statement supporting the need to

issue the regulation. In addition,

Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to

develop an effective process permitting

elected officials and other

representatives of Indian tribal

governments ‘‘to provide meaningful

and timely input in the development of

regulatory policies on matters that

significantly or uniquely affect their

communities.’’

Under section 3(b) of Executive Order

13084, EPA may not issue a regulation

that is not required by statute, that

significantly or uniquely affects the

communities of Indian Tribal

governments, and that imposes

substantial direct compliance costs on

those communities, unless the Federal

government provides the funds

necessary to pay the direct compliance

costs incurred by the Tribal

governments, or EPA consults with

those governments. In this case, the

addition of the site to the NPL will not

impose any substantial direct

compliance costs on the Tribes. While

the Tribes may incur costs from

participating in the investigations and

cleanup decisions, those costs are not

compliance costs. Accordingly, the

requirements of section 3(b) of

Executive Order 13084 do not apply to

this proposed rule.

TABLE 1.—NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST

PROPOSED RULE NO. 34, GENERAL

SUPERFUND SECTION

State Site name City/

county

CA ....... Del Amo ............... Los Angeles.

CT ....... Broad Brook Mill .. East Windsor.

ID ......... St. Maries Creosote.St. Maries.

MT ....... Barker Hughesville

Mining District.

Barker.

MT ....... Carpenter Snow

Creek Mining

District.

Neihart.

NY ....... Consolidated Iron

and Metal.

Newburgh.

OR ....... Taylor Lumber and

Treating.

Sheridan.

UT ....... Bountiful/Woods

Cross 5th South

PCE Plume.

Bountiful/

Woods

Cross.

UT ....... Davenport and

Flagstaff Smelters.

Sandy City.

VT ........ Elizabeth Mine ..... Strafford.

WA ...... Lower Duwamish

Waterway.

Seattle.

WI ........ Ashland/Northland

States Power

Lakefront.

Ashland.

Number of Sites Proposed to General

Superfund Section: 12.

TABLE 2.—NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST

PROPOSED RULE NO. 34, FEDERAL

FACILITIES SECTION

State Site name City/

county

IL ......... Chanute Air Force Base Rantoul.

Number of Sites Proposed to Federal

Facilities Section: 1.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous

substances, hazardous waste,

Intergovernmental relations, Natural

resources, Oil pollution, penalties,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Superfund, Water

pollution control, Water supply.

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.

9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,

1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,

3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.

Dated: November 22, 2000.

Timothy Fields, Jr.,

Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste

and Emergency Response.

[FR Doc. 00–30631 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00–2595, MM Docket No. 00–233, RM–

9996]

Digital Television Broadcast Service;

Fort Walton Beach, FL

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission requests

comments on a petition filed by

Television Fit-For-Life, Inc., licensee of

station WFGX(TV), NTSC channel 35,

Fort Walton Beach, Florida, requesting

the substitution of DTV channel 50 for

station WFGX(TV)’s assigned DTV

channel 25. DTV channel 50 can be

allotted to Fort Walton Beach, Florida,

in compliance with the principle

community coverage requirements of

Section 73.625(a) at reference

coordinates (30–24–12 N. and 86–59–34

W.). As requested, we propose to allot

DTV Channel 50 to Fort Walton Beach

with a power of 1000 and a height above

average terrain (HAAT) of 221 meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before January 16, 2001, and reply

comments on or before January 31,

2001.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W.,

Room TW–A325, Washington, DC

20554. In addition to filing comments

with the FCC, interested parties should

serve the petitioner, or its counsel or

consultant, as follows: James A.

Koerner, Koerner & Olender, P.C., 5809

Nicholson Lane, Suite 124, Bethesda,

Maryland 20852–5706 (Counsel for

Television Fit-For-Life, Inc.).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam

Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202)

418–1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No.

00–233, adopted November 22, 2000,

and released November 24, 2000. The

full text of this Commission decision is

available for inspection and copying

during normal business hours in the

75222 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Proposed Rules

FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street,

SW., Washington, DC. The complete

text of this decision may also be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor, International Transcription

Services, Inc., (202) 857–3800, 1231

20th Street, NW., Washington, DC

20036.

Provisions of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to

this proceeding.

Members of the public should note

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Rule Making is issued until the matter

is no longer subject to Commission

consideration or court review, all ex

parte contacts are prohibited in

Commission proceedings, such as this

one, which involve channel allotments.

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules

governing permissible ex parte contacts.

For information regarding proper

filing procedures for comments, see 47

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Television, Digital television

broadcasting.

For the reasons discussed in the

preamble, the Federal Communications

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR

part 73 as follows:

PART 73—TELEVISION BROADCAST

SERVICES

1. The authority citation for part 73

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and

336.

§ 73.622 [Amended]

2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of

Digital Television Allotments under

Florida is amended by removing DTV

Channel 25 and adding DTV Channel 50

at Fort Walton Beach.

Federal Communications Commission

Barbara A. Kreisman,

Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 00–30688 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–U

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00–2570; MM Docket No. 00–228, RM–

9991]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Linden,

White Oak, Lufkin, Corrigan, Mount

Enterprise, and Pineland, TX and

Zwolle, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: This document requests

comments on a petition filed by OARA,

Inc. proposing the reallotment of

Channel 257C2 from Linden, Texas, to

White Oak, Texas, as that community’s

first local service. The coordinates for

Channel 257C2 at White Oak are 32–30–

32 and 94–50–41. To accommodate the

allotment at White Oak, we shall also

propose to substitute Channel 261C2 for

Channel 257C2 at Lufkin, Texas, and

modifiy the license for Station KUEZ at

coordinates 31–24–28 and 94–45–53;

substitute Channel 257A for vacant

Channel 261A at Corrigan, Texas, at

coordinates 30–59–47 and 94–49–36;

reallot Channel 260A from Mount

Enterprise, Texas to Zwolle, Louisiana,

at coordinates 31–37–53 and 93–38–39;

and allot Channel 256A at Pineland,

Texas at coordinates 31–08–48 and 93–

56–53.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before January 2, 2000, and reply

comments on or before January 17,

2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20554. In addition to

filing comments with the FCC,

interested parties should serve the

petitioner’s counsel, as follows: Ann

Bavender, Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth,

P.L.C., 1300 N. 17th Street, 11th Floor,

Arlington, Virginia 22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media

Bureau, (202) 418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

summary of the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No.

00–228, adopted November 1, 2000, and

released November 9, 2000. The full text

of this Commission decision is available

for inspection and copying during

normal business hours in the

Commission’s Reference Center 445

Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, DC

20554. The complete text of this

decision may also be purchased from

the Commission’s copy contractors,

International Transcription Services,

Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857–3800,

facsimile (202) 857–3805.

Provisions of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply to

this proceeding.

Members of the public should note

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Rule Making is issued until the matter

is no longer subject to Commission

consideration or court review, all ex

parte contacts are prohibited in

Commission proceedings, such as this

one, which involve channel allotments.

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules

governing permissible ex parte contact.

For information regarding proper

filing procedures for comments, see 47

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Radio broadcasting.

For the reasons discussed in the

preamble, the Federal Communications

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR

part 73 as follows:

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST

SERVICES

1. The authority citation for part 73

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.

§ 73.202 [Amended]

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM

Allotments under Texas, is amended by

removing Linden, Channel 257C2 and

adding White Oak, Channel 257C2, by

removing Channel 257C2 at Lufkin and

adding Channel 261C2 at Lufkin, by

removing Channel 261A at Corrigan and

adding Channel 257A at Corrigan, by

removing Channel 260A and Mount

Enterprise, and by adding Pineland,

Channel 256A.

3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM

Allotments under Louisiana, is

amended by adding Zwolle, Channel

260A.

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules

Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 00–30689 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration

49 CFR Parts 567, 571, 574 and 575

[Docket No. NHTSA–00–8296]

RIN 2127–AI32

Certification; Federal Motor Vehicle

Safety Standards; Tire Identification

and Recordkeeping; Consumer

Information Regulations

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration (NHTSA),

Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed

rulemaking (ANPRM).

SUMMARY: Section 11 of the recently

enacted Transportation Recall

Enhancement, Accountability, and

Documentation (TREAD) Act requires