alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Executive Incentive Metrics



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 Tier Technologies, Inc. 
 Executive Incentive Metrics for 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
 AND 
 SR. VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER 
 For the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2005 
 (Approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors May 3, 2005) 
  
 On May 3, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Tier Technologies, Inc. (“Tier”), approved the participation of Mr. James Weaver, Chief
Executive Officer, and Mr. David Fountain, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, in the Incentive Compensation Plan as described below: 
  
 James Weaver, Chief Executive Officer 
  
 Under the Incentive Compensation Plan, Mr. Weaver will be eligible for an annual bonus ranging from 0% to 110% of his annual base compensation ($0 to $605,000). The
actual amount, if any, of Mr. Weaver’s bonus will be determined by the Committee after the close of fiscal year 2005 based on the Committee’s determination of Mr. Weaver’s performance in four specified areas (weighted as indicated):
(1) successfully recruiting key personnel in the financial control area (30%); (2) satisfactorily addressing financial and accounting compliance issues (30%); (3) Tier’s attainment of specified organic net income growth targets (30%); and (4)
providing strategic leadership for the Company (10%). 
  
 David Fountain,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
  
 Under the Incentive
Compensation Plan, Mr. Fountain will be eligible for an annual bonus ranging from 0% to 50% of his annual base compensation ($0 to $162,500). The level of the bonus payout is dependent upon Tier’s attainment of revenue, earnings per share,
average share price and operating income figures.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 25, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIAITON, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, DBWF 2015-LCM (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June 25, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName: Jennifer M. DavisTitle: Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 29, 2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00095-Z-BR

§

JASON CAMPION (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JASON CAMPION (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining JASON CAMPION (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that JASON CAMPION (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) -

POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE FENTANYL and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found 

guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: February 22, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00095-Z-BR Document 44 Filed 02/22/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 122
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1557

To suspend until December 31, 1998, the duty on pectin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 31, 1993

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 1998, the duty on pectin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON PECTIN.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.13.02 Pectin (provided

for in subheading

1302.20.00) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/1998 ’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re9 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for
2

HR 1557 IH

1 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

2 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 11.1
                                  ------------


                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                              OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


Loss Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

         The  computation  of basic loss per common share is computed  using the
weighted  average  number of common  shares  outstanding  during each year.  The
computation  of diluted loss per common  share is based on the weighted  average
number of shares  outstanding  during the period plus common  stock  equivalents
which would arise from the exercise of stock  options and  warrants  outstanding
using the treasury  stock  method and the average  market price per share during
the year.  Options and warrants to purchase  40,630,567 and 34,079,334 shares of
common stock at prices  ranging from $.09 to $3.00 were  outstanding at June 30,
2003 and 2002,  respectively.  Certain  notes  payable and  long-term  debt were
convertible  into a total of 14,485,345 and 9,381,533  shares of common stock at
June 30, 2003 and 2002,  respectively,  with conversion prices ranging from $.20
to $.80. Common stock equivalents arising out of Series B Cumulative  Redeemable
Non-Voting  Preferred  Stock may arise in October 2005, if the Company elects to
redeem the Series B 15%  Cumulative  Redeemable  Non-Voting  Preferred  Stock in
common shares instead of cash.  The redemption  price will be 80% of the average
twenty trading day closing bid price immediately preceding redemption on October
31, 2003. If Series B 15% Cumulative  Redeemable  Non-Voting Preferred Stock had
been required to have been redeemed at June 30, 2003, the redemption price would
have been $.23 per common share, resulting in the issuance of 100,243,038 shares
of common stock.  The number of common shares issued on the redemption  date may
be more or less than that number,  depending upon the redemption price in effect
on the date of redemption,  October 31, 2005.  Common stock equivalents were not
included in the diluted loss per share calculation because the effect would have
been antidilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 23 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 23

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  prohibit compelling the attendance of a student in a public school 
  other than the public school nearest the residence of such student.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mr. Emerson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  prohibit compelling the attendance of a student in a public school 
  other than the public school nearest the residence of such student.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be valid only if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of final passage of this joint 
resolution:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. No student shall be compelled to attend a public 
school other than the public school nearest to the residence of such 
student which is located within the school district in which such 
student resides and which provides the course of study pursued by such 
student.
    ``Section 2. The Congress and the several States shall have power 
to enforce this article by appropriate legislation and to insure equal 
educational opportunities for all students.''.

                                 <all>
```
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02995

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sean B. OConnor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  |                        
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ Sean B. OConnor   
|                       |  |  |  | Sean B. OConnor       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce D. Broussard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce D. Broussard                         
|Bruce D. Broussard                             
|Chief Executive Officer of                     
|US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology,Inc.
|                                               
|May 7, 2009
Flint Creek Environmental Controls Costs

10/21/11 - Rev.4

Technology $/kw Total Direct Capital

1 SCR

1.1 Capital

Installed $230 1$121.4

$/Year $/Year

Catalyst Replacement (levalized 

per year)

$1.5 2 $1.5

1.2 O&M

Variable

Urea $2.20 $2.2

Fixed

Operating Labor Cost $0.53 3

Maintenance Labor $0.53 4

Maintenance Material $0.50 5

Total Fixed O&M $1.56 $1.6

Notes: A - Cost are in $MM

B - Capital costs are "all-in" direct cost. Indirect - OH, AFUDC, etc. are not included.

1 - Interpolation between $203/kw for Roclport and $234/kw for CV 6

2 - levalized cost based on 50% of estimated recurring Rockport replacement costs

3 - 1 person per shift 5 shifts

4 - 1 person per shift 5 shifts

5 - Base on O&M study information from Arsenal Hill Plant

SCR
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1129 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 8, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide an 

annual grant to facilitate an iron working training program for Native Americans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1129 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. IRON WORKING TRAINING PROGRAM FOR NA2 TIVE AMERICANS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent funds are made 

4 available for this purpose, the Secretary of the Interior, 

5 acting through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, shall annu6 ally provide a grant to an eligible entity to provide an iron 

7 working training program for members of federally recog8 nized Indian tribes. An eligible entity that receives a grant 

9 under this section shall provide a program that meets the 

10 requirements of subsection (b) and may require such other 

11 criteria of the program and participants of the program 

12 as the eligible entity considers appropriate to further the 

13 goals of the program. 

14 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—A program funded by a grant 

15 under this section shall— 

16 (1) provide specialized training in iron working 

17 skills to adult members of federally recognized In18 dian tribes; 

19 (2) provide classroom and on-the-job training; 

20 and 

21 (3) facilitate job placement for participants 

22 upon successful completion of the requirements of 

23 the program. 

24 (c) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—To be eligible for a grant 

25 under this section, an entity shall— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1129 RFS 

1 (1) have proven experience in providing success2 ful iron working training programs to Native Amer3 ican populations; and 

4 (2) have the facilities necessary to carry out 

5 such a program with a grant provided under this 

6 section. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 7, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM GEOSCIENCE CORPORATION FORM 10Q FIRST QUARTER 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,294
<INVENTORY>                                     67,106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,225 
<PP&E>                                          51,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,652
<SALES>                                         30,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,142
<CGS>                                           18,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,633)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>