alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71322-71323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be

[[Page 71323]]

received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 26, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. PSB Bancorp, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; to acquire 37 
percent of the voting shares of Iron Bridge Holdings, Inc., Plymouth 
Meeting, Pennsylvania, and thereby engage de novo in financial and 
investment advisory activities, pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(6) of 
Regulation Y, and management consulting and counseling activities, 
pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(9) of Regulation Y.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Great Southern Bancorp, Inc., Springfield, Missouri; to acquire 
up to 20 percent of the outstanding voting shares of Guaranty Federal 
Bancshares, Inc., Springfield, Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Guaranty Federal Savings Bank, Springfield, Missouri, and thereby 
engage in the operation of a savings association, pursuant to 
Sec. 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 27, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-30549 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 10.1
                                 Lloyds TSB Corporate

                                 Lloyds TSB Bank plc
                                 P O Box 908
                                 125 Colmore Row
                                 Birmingham            Telephone:  0121 625 6746
                                 B3 3AE                Facsimile:  0121 212 0861

                                                       Reference:

                                 2nd March 2005

The Directors
Timet UK Limited
PO Box 704
Witton
Birmingham
B6 7UR

Dear Sirs,

We refer to a letter  dated 20th  December  2002 as amended by our letter  dated
19th December 2003 and 11th November 2004  (together the "Facility  Letter") and
to the  security  documents  required to be effected  thereby from time to time.
Pursuant to the foregoing we agreed to make  available to you loan and overdraft
facilities of up to (pound)22,500,000.

We hereby confirm that with effect from the Effective Date and provided that the
Effective  Date  occurs not later than 2nd April 2005 the  following  amendments
shall be made to the Facility Letter:

1.   the definition of "Commitment Termination Date" contained in Clause 1 shall
     be amended to read "means 31st May 2005 or such later date as may from time
     to time be agreed pursuant to Clause 2.5 hereof".

All  other  terms  and  conditions  expressed  in  the  Facility  Letter  remain
unaltered, and from the Effective Date the Facility Letter and this letter shall
be construed as one agreement.

The Effective Date shall be the date upon which we shall have received and found
in order:

(a)  a copy of this letter duly signed by you in  acceptance  of the  amendments
     contained herein;

(b)  a  certified  copy of your  board  resolution  approving  the terms of this
     letter  and  authorising  a person or  persons  to sign on your  behalf the
     acknowledgement appearing on the duplicate copy of this letter; and

(c)  if not already in our possession, duly authenticated specimen signatures of
     the person(s) so authorised.


Yours faithfully,
For and on behalf of Lloyds TSB Bank plc


/s/ James Benyon
----------------

James Benyon
Senior Relationship Manager
Lloyds TSB Corporate
EXHIBIT
32-2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund
V, L.P., Series 3 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice
President -Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R.
WENK


Melanie
R. Wenk


Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





January
08, 2010
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




Form of Restricted Stock Award




     RESOLVED, that the Company issue to _________  ______restricted shares of
the Common Stock of the Company, $1.00 par value per share (the “Restricted
Shares”) under the Company’s 2002 Director & Officer
Long-Term Incentive Plan, of which
______ shares are to vest on _________ in the years ______ and ______ and ______ are to
vest on _________ subject to continued employment with the Company;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that if ______ does not remain employed by the Company other
than by death or disability, the Restricted Shares shall be forfeited to the
Company to become treasury shares of the Company;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that in the event ______ does not remain employed by the
Company due to his disability, all Restricted Shares shall immediately vest;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that upon the death of the employee while in active service,
all Restricted Shares shall immediately vest with the estate of the deceased being
the beneficiary;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that pending vesting of the Restricted Shares, ______ shall
be entitled to dividends paid with respect to the Restricted Shares;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Restricted Shares shall be issued pursuant to the
2002 Director & Officer Long-Term Incentive Plan of the Company and are subject to
and governed by the additional terms and conditions of that Plan, including
(without limitation) the change of control provisions of Section 16 of the Plan;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that when the Restricted Shares are issued and delivered to
______, they shall be fully paid and non-assessable and subject to the conditions
described above;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the proper officers of the Company be, and each of them
hereby is, authorized to prepare, execute, deliver and perform such agreements,
documents, certificates and other instruments and take such other action, in the
name and on behalf of the Company, as each of such officers, in the officer’s
discretion, shall deem necessary or advisable to carry out the intent of the
foregoing resolutions and the transactions contemplated thereby, the taking of such
action and the preparation, execution, delivery and performance of any such
agreements, documents, certificates and other instruments or the performance of any
such act shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of this Board of Directors
thereof and all matters relating thereto; and



     RESOLVED FURTHER, that any and all actions taken by or on behalf of the
officers of the Company prior to the adoption of these resolutions that are within
the authority conferred hereby are hereby in all respects ratified, confirmed and
approved.
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 16, 2007*

#### JEFFREY A. DYE and NANCY A. DYE VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-07-069)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimants brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when their 2007 Ford 500 struck a hole while claimant Nancy Dye was traveling on Old Route 50 in Harrison County. Old Route 50 is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to make an award in this claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred at approximately 7:30 p.m. on March 2, 2007. Old Route 50 is a two-lane highway at the area of the incident involved in this claim. Claimant Nancy Dye testified that she was driving on Old Route 50 when she saw the hole. She stated that she tried to avoid the hole but could not because of oncoming traffic. Claimant’s vehicle struck the hole, sustaining damage to a rim and a tire. She stated that the hole was approximately six inches deep. Claimants’ vehicle sustained damage totaling $460.33.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Old Route 50 at the site of the claimants’ accident for the date in question. David Cava, Highway Administrator for respondent in Harrison County, testified that respondent received a complaint about a hole on Old Route 50 several days after claimants’ incident. Mr. Cava stated that at that time, a crew went out to the hole and repaired it. Respondent maintains that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Old Route 50 prior to claimants’ incident.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins vs. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645; 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman*vs. *Dept. of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had at least constructive notice of the hole which claimants’ vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. Photographs in evidence depict the hole and provide the Court an accurate portrayal of the size and location of the hole on Old Route 50. The size of the hole and the time of the year in which claimants ’ incident occurred leads the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this hazardous condition and respondent had an adequate amount of time to take corrective action. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent and claimants may make a recovery for the damage to their vehicle.

*34In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to claimants in this claim in the amount of $460.33.

Award of $460.33.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2015-PC1 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"): 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and 

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

February 27, 2017 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President 

 

/s/ Jeffery Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta 

Assistant Secretary 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000870179
<NAME>                           PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES XVI, INC.    
<MULTIPLIER>                                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                                        US
       
<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                           Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                             Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                    1
<CASH>                                                     2,312,000
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                247,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           2,559,000
<PP&E>                                                    67,225,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (18,121,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            51,663,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      3,153,000
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      41,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                48,469,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              51,663,000
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          11,078,000
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              5,540,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             293,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            5,245,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        5,245,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               5,245,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   1.23
        

</TABLE>
First Amendment to Officer Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 OFFICER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 Pursuant to Section 14 of the Officer Employment Agreement effective as of
                     (the “Agreement”) entitled “Waiver; Modification,” the parties to the Agreement hereby modify the
Agreement as provided below. 
  
 Section 6(b)(ii) shall be
amended by deleting the second sentence thereto and by replacing it with the following sentence: 
  
 Such payment shall be made, in the Company’s sole discretion, either (1) in accordance with normal payroll procedures applicable to senior executive
officers at the time of such termination; (2) in a single lump sum payment; or (3) in a combination of normal payroll procedures followed by a lump sum payment for the balance of the payment; provided, that, in all cases, all payments shall be
completed within the taxable year in which the Officer terminates employment, or such later time as permitted under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code or its successor and the guidance provided by the Internal Revenue Service or Department of
Treasury, such that the amount paid shall not be considered “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A. 
  
 All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and unamended. 
  

Dated this 1st day of February of
2005. 
  

			
	FIRST STATE BANCORPORATION
		
	By:	 	  


	Title:	 	  


	
	OFFICER
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, William C. Stone, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Not applicable;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ William C. Stone     William C. Stone  Chief Executive Officer and  Chairman of the Board of Directors  (Principal Executive Officer)
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 19812.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1938.

W. D. Hollars and Storey, Storey & Donaghey, all of Vernon, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of chickens; the punishment is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

Appellant’s only contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. We are inclined to agree with him.

The testimony shows that on or about the 11th day of December, 1937, appellant sold some white leghorn chickens to S. D. Patterson; that Patterson purchased five different bunches of chickens from the appellant over a period of about a month. Mr. J. T. Wayland testified that about the 11th of December he reported to the officers that he had lost some chickens. That he did not find the chickens at Mrs. Patterson’s ; that he filed a complaint -against the appellant, charging him with the theft of the chickens. He further testified:

> “The chickens belonged to my wife. She owned everything. . I never did have anything in my life. After the complaint was made, I went back home and my wife said she- had given the boy (appellant) some chickens during the summer months; that she had given him these chickens for work which he had done around the place.”

Mrs. J. T. Wayland testified that the appellant was her brother; that he lived with them during the month of December.

> “My brother sold some chickens and those were mine. I gave him permission to sell the chickens. I gave him about four dozen in August for some work which he did and I told him he could sell • them when he wanted to. He brought part of *109them to town in our car. He did not take these chickens at night. He went and got them in the daytime and brought them to town. I was there when he got the chickens along about the 11th-of December.”

The appellant did not testify or offer any testimony. It is obvious from the facts above recited that if Mr. and Mr.s. Wayland owned the chickens, or even if Mr. Wayland alone owned them, but his wife gave appellant permission to sell them, he would not be guilty of theft, because the fraudulent intent, which is an essential element of theft, is altogether lacking. See Landin v. State, 10 Tex.App. 63; Cox v. State, 28 Tex.App. 92, 12 S.W. 493.

Having reached the conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction for theft, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.