alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Chief Executive Officers Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

I, Michael K. Paulk,
certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form
10-K of American Natural Energy Corporation;

2.

Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small
business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:



Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.

The small
business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date: April 27, 2009 | /s/ Michael K.
    Paulk
|-------------------- | ------------------------
|                     | Michael K. Paulk        
|                     | President               

---
United States Court of Appeals

FIFTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

LYLE W. CAYCE

CLERK

TEL. 504-310-7700

600 S. MAESTRI PLACE, 

Suite 115

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

August 17, 2023

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW:

No. 23-10718 VanDerStok v. Garland

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691

Enclosed is an order entered in this case.

 Sincerely,

LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk

 By: _________________________

Roeshawn Johnson, Deputy Clerk

504-310-7998

Mr. William V. Bergstrom

Mr. Connor McCarthy Blair

Mr. J. Mark Brewer

Mr. Richard Brent Cooper

Mr. Dennis Daniels

Mr. Chad Flores

Ms. Kathleen R. Hartnett

Mr. Sean Janda

Mr. Adam M. Katz

Ms. Karen S. Mitchell

Mr. Stephen Obermeier

Mr. Peter A. Patterson

Mr. Brian Daniel Poe

Mr. Daniel M. Riess

Mr. Matthew Joseph Smid

Mr. Michael J. Sullivan

Mr. John Parker Sweeney

Mrs. Jennifer L. Swize

Mr. David H. Thompson

Ms. Abby Christine Wright

Case: 23-10718 Document: 00516862678 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 255-1 Filed 08/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5057
Hardesty Parraguirre Cherry J. J. appellant was determined to be competent during the trial proceedings and appellant failed to demonstrate that a change occurred in his mental status that would explain his delay in filing the petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3

cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Donald Ray McCune Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
...continued defective petition. Phelps v. Director, Prisons, 104 Nev. 656, 764 P.2d 1303 (1988). 3 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 2 I
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1346

To redesignate the Federal building located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands,

as the ‘‘Almeric L. Christian Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. DE LUGO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located on St. Croix,

Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Almeric L. Christian Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located on St. Croix, Virgin Is5 lands, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Almeric L.

6 Christian Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be
2

•HR 1346 IH

1 a reference to the ‘‘Almeric L. Christian Federal

2 Building’’.

Æ
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY 

The Honorable Paul D. Ryan 

Speaker 

U.S. House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Speaker: 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

March 8, 2017 

I write to apprise you of certain upcoming events and actions related to the debt limit. As you 

know, the Bipartisan Budget Act of2015 suspended the statutory debt limit through Wednesday, 

March 15, 2017. Beginning on Thursday, March 16, 2017, the outstanding debt of the United 

States will be at the statutory limit. At that time, Treasury anticipates that it will need to start 

taking certain extraordinary measures in order to temporarily prevent the United States from 

defaulting on its obligations. 

Today, Treasury is announcing that it will suspend the sale of State and Local Government 

Series (SLGS) securities. SLGS are special-purpose Treasury securities issued to states and 

municipalities to assist them in conforming to certain tax rules. These securities count against 

the debt limit. The suspension of SLGS sales will commence on March 15, 2017, and continue 

until the debt limit is either raised or suspended. As in the past, it is likely Treasury will utilize 

additional extraordinary measures. 

As I said in my confirmation hearing, honoring the full faith and credit of our outstanding debt is 

a critical commitment. I encourage Congress to raise the debt limit at the first opportunity so 

that we can proceed with our joint priorities. 

Sincerely, 

Steven T. Mnuchin 

Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader 

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader 

The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Democratic Leader 

cc: The Honorable Kevin Brady, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means 

The Honorable Richard Neal, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means 

The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance 

The Honorable Ron Wyden, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance 

All other Members of the 115th Congress
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SUMMEDIA.COM
INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,108,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,133)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,578,976
<PP&E>                                       1,959,314
<DEPRECIATION>                               (118,493)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,110,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,580,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       161,420
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,308,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,110,208
<SALES>                                        132,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,051
<CGS>                                          117,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,328,882
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,314,771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,314,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,314,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

r•ltr-•, U . , . D~/\ I;.: :·:, -~·: 1) 11··1· C0'•1•··- . v . ,,_ . ., ,,u.., unl 

NORTHERN DISI CF T,< 

LUBBOC/~ D!'!l~IOrJ 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 2022 UOV -9 PH~: 49 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DEPUTY CLERK~ 

V. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 5:22-CR-097-H-BQ-l 

LUIS JIMENEZ § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count Two of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(J)(A)(i), that is, Possession of Firearms in Furtherance of a Drug 

Trafficking Crime. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate 

judge finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00097-H-BQ Document 28 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 67
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days oftoday. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed November 9, 2022. 

D. RY 

UNITED STATES MA 

Case 5:22-cr-00097-H-BQ Document 28 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 68
EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas H.
Reslewic, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Thomas H. Reslewic
----------------------
Thomas H. Reslewic
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Photonix, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  March  30,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  we
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




June 26, 2003                                /s/ Richard D. Kurtz
-------------                                ----------------------------------
Date                                         Richard D. Kurtz
                                             Chief Executive Officer




June 26, 2003                                /s/ Paul D. Ludwig
-------------                                ----------------------------------
Date                                         Paul D. Ludwig
                                             President




June 26, 2003                                /s/ Susan A. Schmidt
-------------                                ----------------------------------
Date                                         Susan A. Schmidt
                                             Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
#### BANTUELLE v. EVANS.

No. 5546.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

April 17, 1940.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1940.

E. Newt Spivey and W. T. Williams, both of Texarkana, for appellant.

Wm. V. Brown, of Texarkana, for ap-pellee.

WILLIAMS, Justice.

A two-wheel trailer attached to appellant’s automobile, going south, and appel-lee’s automobile, going north, collided on a wet asphalt pavement. It is without dispute that appellant’s car was skidding as it approached a 30-foot bridge. After the collision this car was resting about fifteen feet south of the bridge, headed at an angle into an embankment, with the trailer extending into the highway. Appellee’s car was in a ditch on the opposite side. Appel-lee contended in her pleading and evidence that appellant was driving at an excessive rate of speed as he approached the bridge from out of a curve, and negligently applied the brakes and caused his car to swerve and swing the trailer into and strike appellee’s car as same was in the act of passing. Appellant contends that appel-lee saw, or by the use of ordinary care could have seen, the swerving car in time to have stopped and avoided the collision, but negligently ran into appellant’s car after it had practically come to a stop. Special issues which involved these respective contentions were submitted to the jury. The jury found the collision, was not due to an unavoidable accident; absolved appellee from any alleged negligent act, and found appellant guilty of operating his car at an excessive rate of speed and negligently applied his brakes under the circumstances, and each to be a proximate cause of the collision. Appellee recovered judgment for damages to her automobile.

Appellant’s sole proposition asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings of the jury. The evidence has been carefully examined, and though conflicting, the conclusion is not to be reached that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s findings. Under such a condition of the record, an appellate court will hot disturb same. 3 T.J. p. 1096, Sec. 768, and authorities there cited.

The judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

COREY RODRIGUES

 Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-cv-00607-P

REGINALD ROY LOWE, ET AL.

 Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 58. In accordance with the Court’s Order dismissing all 

claims against Defendants Dakota Wayne Coston and Lewis Anthony 

Valasquez (ECF No. 31) entered on September 26, 2023: 

It is ORDERED that all such claims are DISMISSED without 

prejudice.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a true copy of this Final 

Judgment to the Parties.

SO ORDERED on this 26th day of September 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

REGINALEA KEMP,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:23-cv-00841-P

REGIONS BANK ET AL.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File 

Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 18. Having considered the Motion 

and applicable docket entries, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

SO ORDERED on this 18th day of September 2023.

______________________________________________

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00607-P Document 32 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 308
Case 4:22-cr-00216-P Document 29 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 54
Case 4:22-cr-00216-P Document 29 Filed 09/28/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 55
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00685-CV

Sergio Pasquale Maggi, M.D. and Sergio Pasquale Maggi, M.D., P.A. d/b/a

Austin Plastic Surgery Center, Appellants

v.

Steven McMillon, individually and as dependent administrator of the estate of Mary

Elizabeth McMillon, deceased; and Alexander Rankin McMillon; Jason Ryan McMillon;

and Lindsay M. Browne, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08-001618, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The appellants’ brief was due on December 22, 2008. On January 21, 2009, this

Court notified appellants that their brief was overdue and that a failure to file a proper motion for

extension of time by February 2, 2009, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of

prosecution. To date, the appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

___________________________________________

 Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 5, 2009
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-42981, and 333-41539) pertaining to National Energy Group,
Inc.'s Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1996 Incentive Compensation Plan and
1996 Individual Compensation Arrangement, respectively, of our report dated
March 24, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
National Energy Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1998.





Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1999
#### WINANS v. STATE.

No. 19518.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 9, 1938.

State’s Rehearing Granted April 20, 1938.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1938.

*82Eugene F. Mathis, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense charged is for violating the local option liquor laws, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq., the punishment assessed- being a-fine of $300.

The record is before us without a complaint being incorporated therein. We have heretofore held’ that a complaint is necessary in order to confer jurisdiction upon the county court. See article 415, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; McQueen v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 117 S.W.2d 79, opinion this day handed down; and Olivares v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 316, 76 S.W.2d 140.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

This cause has been heretofore reversed and ordered dismissed on account of a failure to find embodied in the record the complaint upon which such prosecution should have been predicated.

It is now made to appear that a proper complaint was filed in said cause at the proper time, and the failure to have same present here in the transcript was an inadvertence and mistake upon the part of the county clerk, and, a certified copy thereof being now filed herein, the order dismissing this cause is set aside, and we proceed to consider the same upon its merits.

We find from the agreed statement of facts that certain investigators of the State Liquor Control Board, armed with a search warrant, on July 9, 1937, found 34 twelve-ounce cans of beer, which was intoxicating, in the place of business of appellant, in Runnels county, Tex., which was a “dry area.”

The complaint and information seem to properly charge a violation of the law, no bills of exception appearing in the record. The facts are deemed sufficient, and this .judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant insists that the court erred in holding the complaint and information sufficient to charge the offense. An examination thereof convinces us that the cause was properly disposed of in our original opinion. The statement of facts included in the record is sufficient to support the conviction.

The motion for a rehearing is overruled.

PER GURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been'examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.