alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Barry Bannister 3/17/2014 Concur. 

(Safety) 

Boeing Paul Beuter Numerous Concur. 

(Maintenance) 

Boeing Arne Haneberg (Flight Numerous Concur. 

Controls AR) 

Boeing Fritz Soedel (Flight Numerous Concur. 

Controls AR) 

Other/Additional Information: Although Boeing doesn't concur that this issue is "Safety," they 

concur with the AD actions and compliance times.
#### WHITTLE et al. v. STATE.

No. 21245.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 13, *1940.*

Clifford C. Keith, of Midland, for appellants.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCPIAMP, Judge.

Appellants were tried jointly by a jury in Midland County on a charge of robbery with firearms. A verdict of guilt with a sente.nce of thirty years 'in the penitentiary was assessed against each.

The record is before us without bills of exception. The proceedings seem to be regular and the facts of the case amply justify the jury in returning the verdict which they did in the case. There is nothing before us for consideration. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  302  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF 2002

I,  James  P.  Stapleton,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of PeopleView, Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  Annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this Annual Report;

4.  PeopleViews' other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and  maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules  13a-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:
d)     designed  such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;
e)     evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual
Report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and
f)     presented in this Annual Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  my  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5.  I  have  disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors  and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing  the  equivalent  functions):
c)     all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and
d)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or  in  other  factors  that  could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Dated:  May 17, 2004


 /s/  James  P.  Stapleton
--------------------------
James  P.  Stapleton,
Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Financial  Officer)
Order entered June 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00196-CV

ERNEST LANELL BRONSON, Appellant

V.

HSBC BANK USA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-05824-C

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case is past due. By postcard dated February 15, 2019, we 

notified Janet Wright, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No 3, that the reporter’s 

record was overdue and directed her to file the reporter’s record within ten days. By order dated 

April 9, 2019, we again notified Ms. Wright the reporter’s record was overdue, and ordered her 

to file either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) 

written verification that appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s 

record within thirty days. To date, Ms. Wright has failed to comply with the Court’s order.

So that this appeal can proceed, we ORDER Janet Wright to file, within TEN DAYS of 

the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were 

recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay 
for the reporter’s record. We notify appellant that if we receive verification he has not requested 

the reporter’s record or paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we will 

order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 

We expressly CAUTION Ms. Wright that failure to comply with this order WILL result in 

the Court taking such action as is necessary to have Ms. Wright comply with the Court’s orders, 

including an order that she not sit as a court reporter until she complies.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Sally Montgomery 

Presiding Judge

County Court at Law No. 3 

Janet Wright

Official Court Reporter

County Court at Law No. 3

All parties 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### SCOMA v. STATE.

No. 20035.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1938.

*311Leo Darley, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, Stage’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for tampering with an automobile; punishment is assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of three months.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The complaint and information are sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters seem to be in due order.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Francis C. Heil

Senior Attorney

Legal

1101 17th St NW

Suite 600

Washington DC 20036

202-496-5642 Office

francis.heil@aa.com

July 16, 2013

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines, U.S.-Brazil Exemption and Frequency Allocation,

 DOT-OST-2013-0137

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

American Airlines has completed its poll of the carriers served with the captioned application we 

filed on July 12, 2013, and there are no objections. Accordingly, we request approval on an 

expedited basis.

Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil

cc: Docket Branch

Service list
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following 

persons:

howard.kass@usairways.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

thomas.bolling@united.com

ursk@state.gov

____________________

FRANCIS HEIL

July 16, 2013
Exhibit 10.39


 


CONFIDENTIAL


 


CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT.
PORTIONS FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT IS REQUESTED HAVE BEEN MARKED WITH THREE ASTERISKS [***] AND A FOOTNOTE INDICATING "CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT REQUESTED". MATERIAL OMITTED HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.


 


FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT #1


 


This Amendment #1 (this “Amendment”)
is entered into by and between New Skies Satellites B.V. (“SES”), and Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. (“Customer”),
and amends the Framework Agreement dated 28 October 2014 between SES and Customer (the “Agreement”). Defined terms
used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to revise the
prepayment requirements under the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:


 


Effective Date: The effective date of this
Amendment shall be 5 January 2015 (the “Effective Date”)


 


Section 2 Prepayment and Security: Subsection
(a) (Pre-Payment) of Section 2 (Pre Payment and Security) is modified to include the following sentence at the end of the subsection:


 


***


 


In Witness Whereof, the Parties
have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date of last signature below.


 


	GLOBAL EAGLE ENTERTAINMENT INC.	NEW SKIES SATELLITES B.V.
	 	 
	By: /s/ Michael Pigott	By: U. Bowsma
	 	 
	Name:  Michael Pigott	Name: U. Bowsma
	 	 
	Title:  VP Legal	Title: Director
	 	 
	Date:  2/10/2015	Date: 2/11/2015


 





 



*** Confidential treatment requested.


 




     


     


    

  


CONFIDENTIAL


 


[INSERT W9 FORM]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Marc Fierman, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink Companies, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and we have:


a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.



Date: March 2, 2004

                                         /s/ Marc Fierman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Marc Fierman, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Aubrey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Kenneth R. AubreyKenneth R. AubreyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2008






---
#### WOFFORD v. STATE.

No. 21096.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 29, 1940.

Rehearing Denied June 26, 1940.

M. H. Barton, of Overton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of the offense of theft of property over the value of $50, the jury assessed his punishment at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 233 (Monday, December 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75734-75735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Conservation Act of 1978; Notice of Permit Modification

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
SUMMARY: The Foundation modified a permit to conduct activities 
regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-
541; 45 CFR Part 670).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

[[Page 75735]]

Description of Permit and Modification

    1. On September 15, 1999, the National Science Foundation issued a 
permit (ACA #2000-004) to Dr. Paul J. Ponganis after posting a notice 
in the August 17, 1999 Federal Regiser. Public comments were not 
received. A request to modify the permit was posted in the Federal 
Register on October 20, 2000. No public comments were received. The 
modification, issued by the Foundation on November 1, 2000, allows for 
entry into the Cape Crozier Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 124 
for the purpose of conducting a census on the newly hatched Emperor 
penguin chicks.
    Location: ASPA 124--Cape Crozier, Ross Island.
    Dates: November 15, 2000 to February 28, 2002.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30747 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.15.a

                            ASSIGNMENT AND AMENDMENT
                            TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Assignment and Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into
effective as of February 1, 1997 by and among Granite Construction Company
("Granite Co."), Granite Construction Incorporated ("Granite Inc.") and Mark E.
Boitano (the "Executive").

      WHEREAS, Granite Co. and the Executive entered into an Employment
Agreement effective as of April 20, 1990 (the "Agreement").

      WHEREAS, subsequent to execution of the Agreement, Executive, along with
other executives of Granite Co., was formally employed by Granite Inc., the
parent of Granite Co.

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to transfer the obligations of Granite Co.
under the Agreement to Granite Inc.

      NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      1.    Assignment. All obligations of Granite Co. under the Agreement are
      hereby assigned to and assumed by Granite Inc.

      2.    Meaning of "Company". All references to "Company" in the Agreement
      as hereby amended, including expressly the references relating to change
      in control in Section 6 of the Agreement, are hereinafter references to
      Granite Inc.

<PAGE>

      3.    No Further Changes. Except as set forth herein the Agreement shall
            remain in full force and effect as originally written.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment and
Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as the day and year first above
written.

GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY                   GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
                                               INCORPORATED

By: /s/ David H. Watts                         By: /s/ David H. Watts
    ------------------------                       -----------------------------

Title: David H. Watts                          Title: David H. Watts

EXECUTIVE

/s/ Mark E. Boitano
----------------------------

Mark E. Boitano
----------------------------
    Name (Please Print)
Summary of Analytical Results

(662 - April 2011)

 Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB Date 4/4/11 4/11/11 4/18/11 4/25/11 Top (ft) 0000 Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0000

Analyte units Diss. (D) Duplicate # 1111

PFOA ug/L T 7.49 7.25 5.61 7.24

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services. Reported results  collected on 4/11/11 represents the average of duplicate results.

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acidug/L = micrograms per Liter

 represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 4/11/11. Aceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1

cwk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<NAME> Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P.
<CIK>  0000943322
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         164,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,663
<INVENTORY>                                     12,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               248,433
<PP&E>                                       2,320,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                 482,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,296,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          260,195
<BONDS>                                      1,736,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,296,219
<SALES>                                      1,045,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,161,925
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  646,234<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               269,246<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,519
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             165,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (34,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (34,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 14,903
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,534)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other.
<F2>Includes general & administrative, depreciation & amortization, and Trump
World's Fair closing costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Compensation



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 Description of Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 
  
 The description below contains only certain information regarding the compensation of the non-employee directors of Sunterra Corporation. Additional information can be
found in our proxy statements, reports, and other exhibits filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  
 Effective with the first quarter of fiscal 2005, each non-employee director of Sunterra Corporation is entitled to an annual retention fee of $30,000 in addition to a fee
of $1,250 per in person meeting of the board of directors, a fee of $1,250 for the annual meeting and a fee of $750 per telephonic meeting of the board of directors. An additional annual fee of $4,000 is paid to non-employee directors for each
committee membership, a fee of $500 per meeting of the committee and an additional $5,000 for serving as the chairman of any committee (except for the audit committee chairman who receives $10,000). The non-executive chairman is also entitled to an
annual fee of $15,000. Each non-employee director is also entitled to an annual grant of stock-based compensation equivalent to $40,000 to be issued in advance on the first day of the fiscal year. 
  
 A director who is also an employee of Sunterra Corporation does not receive additional
compensation for service as a director. 
  
 Sunterra Corporation pays for or
reimburses its directors’ travel, lodging and other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attendance at board, committee and stockholder meetings, and for other reasonable expenses related to board service such as continuing
education.
Slip Op. 15-11 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

________________________________________________ 

### UNITED 

### S TATES OF 

### AMERICA 

### , : Plaintiff , : v. : 

### M ILLENIUM 

### LUMBER 

### D ISTRIBUTION 

### C O 

### . : 

### L TD 

### . and 

### XL S PECIALTY 

### INSURANCE 

### C OMPANY 

### , : Defendants . :

________________________________________________________________________________ Court No. 06-00129 

### XL S PECIALTY 

### INSURANCE 

### C OMPANY 

### , : Cross-Claimant , : v. : 

### M ILLENIUM 

### LUMBER 

### D ISTRIBUTION 

### C O 

### . : 

### L TD 

### ., : Cross-Defendant . 

### ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CROSS-CLAIM Upon consideration of Cross-Claimant XL Specialty Insurance Company’s Notice of Intent to Abandon Further Proceedings on Cross-Claim, it is hereby ORDERED that XL Specialty Insurance Company’s Cross-Claim in this action is dismissed.

______________________________ Delissa A. Ridgway, Judge Dated: New York, New York February 2, 2015 /s/ Delissa A. Ridgway