alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32








<PAGE>







      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ONTV, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Daniel M. Fasano, the Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



                                          By: /s/ Daniel M. Fasano
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Daniel M. Fasano, Chief Executive
                                              and Chief Financial Officer


November 19, 2003
CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auxilio, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Etienne Weidemann, Chief Executive Officer and Paul T. Anthony Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company for the periods presented

Date: May 14, 2009

By:
     /s/ Etienne WeidemannEtienne Weidemann, Chief Executive Officer


By:
     /s/ Paul T. AnthonyPaul T. Anthony, Principal Financial Officer


---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jean-Pierre M. Ergas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Corporation (the
Company) and Kevin C. Kern, Vice-President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 11, 2006



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Jean-Pierre M. Ergas            
|Jean-Pierre M. Ergas                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                   
|Kevin C. Kern                       
|Vice-President of Administration and
|Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30789]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Federal Maritime Commission.

Time and Date:  10 a.m.-December 6, 2000.

Place: 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, D.C.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Docket No. 98-14--Shipping Restrictions, Requirements and 
Practices of the People's Republic of China.
    2. Docket No. 99-19--William J. Brewer v. Saeid B. Maralan (a/k/a 
Sam Bustani) and World Line Shipping, Inc.
    3. Docket No. 96-05--Rose International, Inc. v. Overseas Moving 
Network International.

Contact Person for More Information: Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30789 Filed 11-29-00; 2:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1489 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1489

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision 
   which includes unemployment compensation in income subject to tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1993

Mrs. Kennelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision 
   which includes unemployment compensation in income subject to tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TAXATION OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

    (a) General Rule.--Section 85 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to unemployment compensation) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Repeal of Reporting Requirements.--Section 6050B of such Code 
(relating to returns relating to unemployment compensation) is hereby 
repealed.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--
            (1) The table of sections for part II of subchapter B of 
        chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking the item relating 
        to section 85.
            (2) The table of sections for subpart B of part III of 
        subchapter A of chapter 61 of such Code is amended by striking 
        the item relating to section 6050B.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments received after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,153
<SECURITIES>                                    40,330
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,154
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,100
<PP&E>                                           9,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,788
<SALES>                                         12,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,568 
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,481)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,925)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)    
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1269 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court jurisdiction 

over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2009 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. CARTER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. HALL of 

Texas, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

ALEXANDER, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. LINDER, and Mr. POE

of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal 

court jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of 

Marriage Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marriage Protection 

5 Act of 2009’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1269 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United 

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction 

6 ‘‘No court created by Act of Congress shall have any 

7 jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appel8 late jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining 

9 to the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitu10 tion of, section 1738C of this section.’’. 

11 (b) AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF SECTIONS.— 

12 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 99 of 

13 title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

14 end the following new item: 

‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,150
<SECURITIES>                                    65,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,884
<PP&E>                                          21,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,009
<BONDS>                                          9,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,334
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,091
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (36,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,138)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.17)


</TABLE>
#### SKAGGS v. STATE.

No. 20085.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 11, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1939.

Wallace Hughston, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property of more than the value of fifty dollars, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officers of the Company herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to their knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.             Date: November 2, 2007 By:  /s/ William C. Stone    William C. Stone    Chief Executive Officer           Date:November 2, 2007 By:  /s/ Patrick J. Pedonti    Patrick J. Pedonti    Chief Financial Officer
exv10w1



 










EXHIBIT 10.1




Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc.

1649 Frankford Road West

Carrollton, Texas 75006




August 9, 2004




Ms. Christi Carter Urschel

4923 Brookview Drive

Dallas, Texas 75220



	 	 	 
	Re:

	 	Master Book Agreement, among Meredith Corporation (“Meredith”), Home Interiors
& Gifts, Inc. (“HIG”) and Christi Carter Urschel, dated as of August 9, 2004 (the “Book
Agreement”)






Dear Christi:




     The purpose of this letter agreement is to confirm certain agreements between HIG and you
relating to the undertakings set forth in the Book Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this
letter agreement, unless otherwise defined in this letter agreement, shall have the meanings set
forth in the Book Agreement.



     1. HIG has agreed under Article 7 of the Agreement to purchase approximately 40,000 copies of
the Book (the “Purchased Books”), less the number sold by Meredith pursuant to Article 10 of the
Agreement, for a purchase price of $12.17 per copy of the Book (which shall include cost of dust
jackets, shrink wrap, and a pre-printed barcode with information supplied by Home Interiors). HIG
shall pay you the difference between (i) all Net Receipts generated from the sale of the Purchased
Books, and (ii) the cost of purchasing the Purchased Books and all direct, out-of-pocket costs
associated with marketing, distributing, warehousing, and selling the Purchased Books. You agree
that you will not earn a royalty on any sales of the Purchased Books. HIG agrees that six months
after it makes its initial purchase of Books from Meredith and every three months thereafter, it
will provide you will an accounting that will include the number of Books purchased, the number of
Books sold, the revenue from Books sold, and the direct, out-of-pocket costs associated with
marketing, distributing, warehousing, and selling the Books.



     2. HIG shall consult with you prior to setting the price at which the Books are to be offered
for sale, which price may be different than the MSRP. The price at which the Books are offered for
sale from time to time shall be a matter within the sole discretion of HIG.



     3. You agree that you will give HIG advance notice and approval rights of any written public
communications that refer to HIG in connection with Article 4 of the Book Agreement.



 









 





Ms. Christi Carter Urschel

August 9, 2004

Page 2



     4. You agree that during the term of the Book Agreement you will work with HIG’s marketing and
communications teams to develop concepts for selling the Book through commercial retailers.



     Please indicate your agreement with these terms by executing this letter agreement in the
space below and returning a signed original to me at your earliest convenience.



	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Sincerely,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	/s/MICHAEL D. LOHNER	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Michael D. Lohner	 	 
	

	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	MDL/cll
	 	 	 	 
	Exhibit 10 1.DOC
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	AGREED:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/CHRISTI CARTER URSCHEL



	 	Date: January 20, 2005	 	 
	Christi Carter Urschel
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10393 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus THOMAS CHINERE IHEME, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-410-G

- - - - - - - - - - October 10, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Thomas Chinere Iheme, 64061-080, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He has filed a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Iheme argues that his indictment was fundamentally defective, that his guilty plea was not entered in compliance with the dictates of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, that the district court’sNo. 96-10393 - 2 - sentencing order was overbroad and illegal, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to challenge his indictment. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Iheme has not demonstrated that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Accordingly, Iheme’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Summary of Terms



 Exhibit 10.c. 
  
 Summary of Key Terms of 2005 Executive Cash Bonus Program 
  
 On February 15, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the
Compensation Committee, approved the Company’s 2005 cash bonus program covering the Company’s senior management team, including the following executive officers of CDI Corp.: Roger Ballou (President and CEO), Jay Stuart (Executive Vice
President and CFO), Joseph Seiders (Senior Vice President and General Counsel), and Cecilia Venglarik (Senior Vice President, Human Resources). 
  
 The 2005 target bonuses established for those executive officers are $416,250 for Roger Ballou, $155,000 for Jay Stuart, $85,200 for Joseph Seiders and $99,000 for
Cecilia Venglarik. Under the severance agreement signed by the Company and Jay Stuart, who is scheduled to leave CDI in May 2005, Mr. Stuart would receive a pro rata portion of any 2005 bonus earned. 
  
 Under the 2005 cash bonus program, a bonus pool will be created for the Company’s senior
management team based on CDI’s achievement of certain levels of return on invested capital during 2005. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to increase the amount of the bonus pool by up to 20% to reflect key accomplishments that
positively affect long-term shareholder value. 
  
 Payouts to the executive
officers from any amounts in the bonus pool will be based on the Company’s achievement of certain established financial goals in 2005. The financial goals relate to three measures: direct margin dollars, net income and return on assets. The
three goals are given the following weights: the direct margin dollars goal represents 25% of the total bonus opportunity, the net income goal represents 45%, and the return on assets goal represents 30%. The maximum payout related to the net income
and return on assets goals is 200% of the target level. The payout related to the direct margin goal is capped at 150% of the target.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THE
MIDLAND COGENERATION VENTURE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         202,029
<SECURITIES>                                   143,444
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,261
<PP&E>                                       2,414,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                 640,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,286,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,008
<BONDS>                                      1,723,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     357,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,286,506
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               627,054
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  404,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>