alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 35.1****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**Re:  Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity as Servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2015, among Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1, as Issuer, Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the "Servicing Agreement"), for the period from July 22, 2015, to December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"). I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: (a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision. (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. Dated:  March 22, 2016             /s/ Brian T. Stevens Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller
29 captures
 **Feb**
            APR
            **Jun**12**2016**
            2017
            **2018**
 About this capture
 Government Printing Office
 National Council on Disability
H. R. 1335

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending

September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the

following sum is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury

not otherwise appropriated, to provide emergency supplemental

appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and

for other purposes namely:

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

ADVANCES TO THE UNEMPLOYMENT TRUST FUND AND OTHER FUNDS

For an additional amount for ‘‘Advances to the unemployment

trust fund and other funds’’, $4,000,000,000, to remain available

until September 30, 1994.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1430 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1430

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit physical 
    therapy services to be furnished under the Medicare Program to 
                individuals under the care of a dentist.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2009

  Mr. Pascrell (for himself and Mr. Cantor) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit physical 
    therapy services to be furnished under the Medicare Program to 
                individuals under the care of a dentist.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Oral Health Rehabilitative 
Enhancement Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING PHYSICAL THERAPY TO BE FURNISHED UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM UNDER THE CARE OF A DENTIST.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(p)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w(p)(1)) is amended by inserting ``(2),'' after ``(1),''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Summary of Registrant's 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.13 
  
 Summary of Registrant’s 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan 
  
 For Mr. Russel McMeekin, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Michael A. Sicuro, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary and Mr. Mike Dreitzer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan provides certain target levels for revenue, EBITDA and earnings per share which, if reached, would result in bonus
awards, as well as specific stock option grants and restricted stock awards (with the exception that Mr. Dreitzer’s plan did not contemplate a grant of restricted stock). For Mr. McMeekin, the cash bonus award would be either 60% or 125% of his
base salary, for Mr. Sicuro 60% or 100% and for Mr. Dreitzer 60% or 80%. 
  
 For
Robert J. Parente, Executive Vice President, Sales and Neil Crossan, Executive Vice President, International, the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan contains sales targets which, if reached, would result in cash payment awards. 
  
 The 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan also continues in effect the three-year cumulative
targets established in 2004 for Mr. McMeekin and Mr. Sicuro for revenue, EBITDA and earnings per share which, if reached would result in one-time bonus awards of 100% or 150% for Mr. McMeekin and 80% or 125% for Mr. Sicuro, of their base salaries,
as well as additional grants of stock options and restricted stock.
Exhibit 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-49894) pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc. 1992 Equity Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-09501) pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc. 1995 Equity Incentive Plan,
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-85629) pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc. 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-38660) pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc. Award Agreement dated
June 1, 2000 and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-57756) pertaining to the Burlington Industries, Inc. Award Agreement dated March 7, 2001 of our report dated October 29, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Burlington Industries, Inc. and subsidiary companies (Debtors-in-Possession as of November 15, 2001) included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 28, 2002.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Greensboro, North Carolina


December 20, 2002
#### SOUTHLAND LIFE INS. CO. v. LAWSON.

No. 2123.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Oct. 26, 1939.

Malone, Lipscomb, White & Seay, of Dallas, Felix Atwood, of Ennis, and Lewis T. Carpenter, of Dallas, for appellant.

Frank Cusack, of Dallas, for appellee.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

In our original opinion we said: “On each occasion the company, with full knowledge of all the facts, had accepted the premium and forwarded a receipt therefor either directly to the insured or to Cowart for delivery to him.”

Counsel has called to our attention the fact that all of these receipts were sent directly to the insured. Consequently, the foregoing sentence is changed so as to read: “On each occasion the company, with full knowledge of all the facts, had accepted the premium and forwarded a receipt therefor directly to the insured.” [132 S.W.2d 301, 302.]

The appellant seems to think that we have held that a custom once established cannot be subsequently changed by agreement of the parties. It was not our intention to so hold. Certainly, before' a custom is acted on by either party, it may be changed by mutual agreement. In the case at bar, however, the beneficiary tendered the premium to Cowart before receipt of notice' of a desire to change the custom. Consequently, we held that the tender made at the usual and customary place was sufficient to prevent a forfeiture. See in this connection Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Fields, Tex.Civ.App., 26 S.W. 280.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

GEORGE, J., took no part in the consideration and disposition of this motion.
Summary Compensation Sheet for Named Executive Officers



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 SUMMARY COMPENSATION SHEET FOR NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
  
 At a meeting held on
April 26, 2005, our Board of Directors ratified the decisions of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”), with respect to the annual base salaries of our executive officers effective as of January 1, 2005. The following table sets
forth those annual base salary levels for the year ended December 31, 2005 and annual incentive awards that were paid to our executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2004: 
  

							
	 Name and Position

	  	 Base Salary
 for the Year Ended
 December 31, 2005

	  	 Aggregate Bonus
 for the Year Ended
 December 31, 2004


	 David F. Hofstatter
 Chief Executive
Officer
	  	$	275,000	  	$	27,000
	 Jason S. Spievak
 Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	225,000	  	$	31,500
	 John M. Greathouse
 Executive Vice President of Sales and
Business Development
	  	$	200,000	  	$	41,992
	 David S. Trandal
 Vice President of
Operations
	  	$	160,000	  	$	12,938
	 Colin D. Kelley
 Chief Technology Officer
	  	$	185,000	  	$	17,250
	 David A. Giannini
 Vice President of
Engineering
	  	$	190,000	  	$	27,750
TYRONE L. SMITH

, Appellant,

v.

JULIE JONES, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FIL ED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1169

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Jack M. Schemer , Judge

. Tyrone L. Smith, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kennet h S. Steely, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to the Court’s order of March 17,

2016, the appeal is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). The

dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief in the trial court.

Snelson v. Snelson , 440 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

RAY, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel E. Crowley, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered May 10, 1989, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence he received upon being found guilty of violating his probation is harsh and excessive. However, given defendant’s repeated violations of the terms of his probation, which included the failure to submit to substance abuse evaluation and to participate in treatment as well as his continued use of marihuana, there was no abuse of discretion by County Court in sentencing defendant to a prison term of lió to 4 years *(see, People v Smith,*136 AD2d 867, *lv denied*71 NY2d 1033).

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 10-K, DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,000                  13,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        35,230                  35,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,230                   3,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,230)                 (3,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)                   (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### MILLS v. STATE.

No. 20989.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 24, 1940.

Clarke Wills, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Bell County for the offense of robbery by assault and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

*271We note that the judgment and sentence appearing in the record condemn appellant to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than ten nor more than ten years. 'This is error. Under the terms of the Indeterminate Sentence Law (C.C.P.1925, Art. 775, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 775), the judgment and sentence will be reformed so as to confine appellant in the state penitentiary for a period of not less than five nor more than ten years.

As reformed, the judgment will be affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Santos, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered January 5, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of 15 years to life and *8 Vs*to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that his motion to suppress the evidence found in the basement was improperly denied is unavailing inasmuch as his arguments in support of suppression sought to establish that he had no interest in the basement. He did not claim an "expectation of privacy” in the basement *(People v Ponder,*54 NY2d 160, 166).

Defendant’s claim that the court committed error by admitting the English language translation of the taped conversa*393tion between the informant and one Vinasco, who was also arrested, into evidence is without merit. A transcript is an aid for the jury in a situation where the foreign language tape was of little value to the jury, and the court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the transcript into evidence. *(United States v Rengifo,*789 F2d 975.)

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit, including his assertion that the People placed incompetent evidence before the jury, together with unnecessary expert testimony. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch and Wallach, JJ.
Amendment to License no. DC0000317 for the territory of the Rep. of Kazakhstan



 EXHIBIT 4.11.1 
  
 SUPPLEMENT 
  
 to the Annex to State license MTK No. DS 0000317 issued to Limited Liability 
 Partnership KaR-Tel for Entrepreneurship Activities Involving Provision of GSM 
 Cellular Communications Services 
  
 Add the following clauses to
Chapter 2: 
  
 2.10 The Licensee shall maintain electronic records on the
company’s subscribers, including pre-paid packages, as well as the records of all outgoing and incoming subscriber calls (date, time, duration of calls). 
  

When selling subscriber numbers and pre-paid packages the Licensee shall conclude contracts for the provision of communication services, such contract to contain the
following mandatory items: 
  

	 	•	 	subscriber’s personal details (name, subscriber number, passport data or details of a legal entity, address, TRN); 

  

	 	•	 	obligatory re-registration of subscriber numbers to a new owner when the number is sold; 

  

	 	•	 	warning on blocking of the subscriber number in case of avoidance of the number registration to a new owner. 

  
 2.11 The Licensee pursuant to the applicable legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, upon
demand of competent bodies engaging in search and detection activities shall provide information on the company’s subscribers (name, subscriber number, passport data or details of a legal entity, address, TRN) and information on outgoing and
incoming subscriber calls (date, time, duration of calls), and if necessary, provide a remote access to the electronic database of the company’s subscribers. 
  
 Acting Chairman of the Agency 
 for Information
Technologies and Communications 

			
	 of the Republic of
Kazakhstan                                       
                      [signature]
	  	A. Zhumagaliev
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                          NATIONAL ENERGY GROUP, INC.

          COMPUTATION OF HISTORICAL RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                -------------------------------------------------
                                                 1995      1996       1997       1998       1999
                                                ------   --------   --------   ---------   ------
<S>                                             <C>      <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
Earnings
  Income (loss) before income taxes and
     extraordinary items......................  $  206   $(40,061)  $(41,624)  $(164,514)  $2,024
  Interest expense............................     995      3,621     11,256      15,719    1,909
  Amortization of debt issuance cost..........      37        151        640         936      863
  Interest portion of rental expense..........      34         37         83         100      129
                                                ------   --------   --------   ---------   ------
     Earnings (loss)..........................  $1,272   $(36,252)  $(29,645)  $(147,759)  $4,925
                                                ======   ========   ========   =========   ======
Fixed charges:
  Interest, including capitalized portion.....  $  995   $  3,621   $ 13,801   $  19,090   $1,909
  Amortization of debt issuance cost..........      37        151        640         936      863
  Interest portion of rental expense..........      34         37         83         100      129
                                                ------   --------   --------   ---------   ------
     Fixed charges............................  $1,066   $  3,809   $ 14,524   $  20,126   $2,901
                                                ======   ========   ========   =========   ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges............    1.2X         --         --          --     2.0X(a)
                                                ======   ========   ========   =========   ======
Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges.......      --   $(40,061)  $(44,169)  $(167,885)      --
                                                ======   ========   ========   =========   ======
</TABLE>

---------------

(a) This ratio excludes approximately $17.7 million of interest on the Senior
    Notes since the Company discontinued the accrual of interest due to the
    Chapter 11 proceeding