alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70569-70570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission
* * * * *

Date and Time: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

Date and Time:  Thursday, November 30, 2000 at 10:00 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor)

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-32; U.S. Representative Matthew G. 
Martinez.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-35: Green Party of Washington State by 
Theodore Schlagel, Treasurer.
    Final Rules and Explanation and Justification on General Public 
Political

[[Page 70570]]

Communications Coordinated with Candidates, and Independent 
Expenditures.
    Administrative Matters.

Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Ron. Harris, Press Officer; 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-30091 Filed 11-21-00; 11:42 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### In the Matter of the Petition of NEW HAVEN TOWING COMPANY, as Owner of the Steamtugs HARRY A. COLLIER and DEWEY, Their Engines, Boilers, etc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability.

No. 405.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 8, 1940.

*114Macldin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Richard F. Lenahan, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners-appellants.

Pyne & Lynch, of New York City (Warner Pyne, of New York City, Maurice S. Gerrish and Dudley C. Smith, of New York City, of counsel), for claimantappellee.

Before SWAN, CLARK, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 152 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 152

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and make 
 permanent the deduction for charitable contributions by nonitemizers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and make 
 permanent the deduction for charitable contributions by nonitemizers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF DIRECT CHARITABLE DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 63 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining taxable income) is amended by striking 
out ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1), by striking out the period at 
the end of paragraph (2) and inserting in lieu thereof ``, and'', and 
by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) the direct charitable deduction.''
    (b) Deduction Made Permanent.--Paragraph (4) of section 170(i) of 
such Code (relating to rule for nonitemization of deductions) is 
amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Application of section.--The provisions of this 
        section shall apply to--
                    ``(A) contributions made after December 31, 1981, 
                and before January 1, 1987, and
                    ``(B) contributions made after December 31, 1992.''
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Subsection (d) of section 63 of such Code 
(defining itemized deductions) is amended by striking out ``and'' at 
the end of paragraph (1), by striking out the period at the end of 
paragraph (2) and inserting in lieu thereof ``, and'', and by adding at 
the end thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) the direct charitable deduction.''
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to contributions made after December 31, 1992, in taxable years 
ending after such date.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2


 


Isolagen, Inc.


102 Pickering Way


Exton, PA 
19341


 


April 6, 2005


 


Mr. Todd Greenspan


 


Re:  Offer of Employment


 


Dear Mr. Greenspan:


 


On behalf of
Isolagen, Inc., I am pleased to offer you the position of Director of
Finance, Corporate Controller.  The terms
of this employment offer are as follows:


 


	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
  $145,000 per annum

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Director of Finance, Corporate Controller

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Benefits

  	
   

  	
  You will be eligible for the Company sponsored employee benefits
  described in the Employee Handbook.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Responsibilities

  	
   

  	
  Report to Martin E. Schmieg, Senior Vice President and Chief
  Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Stock Options

  	
   

  	
  50,000 executive stock options of Isolagen, Inc. at $4.45 per
  share (stock price as of close of Start Date) in which one-third of the shares
  vest on the first year anniversary of your start date, one-third of the
  shares vest on the second anniversary of your start date, and one-third of
  the shares vest on the third anniversary of your start date.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Target Bonus

  	
   

  	
  30%

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Vacation

  	
   

  	
  You will be entitled to three weeks vacation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Start Date

  	
   

  	
  Starting on or before May 4, 2005

  



 


This offer of employment is conditioned upon the Company’s receipt of a
complete background review and Directors and Officers Questionnaire, the
results of which are acceptable to the Company. 
In addition, your employment will be subject to the terms of the Company’s
Employee Handbook and the Company’s Proprietary Information and Inventions
Assignment Agreement.


 


	
    Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
    Martin E. Schmieg

  
	
   

  
	
    ACCEPTED:

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
    Todd J. Greenspan
August	29,	2012

Docket	Operations

M

- 30 US	Department	of	Transportation 1200	New	Jersey	Ave,	SE West	Building	Ground	Floor	Room	W12

- 140 Washington,	DC	20590

Subject:	Doc.	No. FAA

- 2002

- 12728;	Exemption	7897D from	14	CFR	(FAR	Sections)

– 91.409(e), 91.409(f),	91.501(a)	and	91.503	thru	91.535

The	National	Business	Aviation	Association,	Inc.	(NBAA)	hereby	petitions	for	an extension	of Exemption	No.	7897D for	a	per iod	of	24	months.	Originally,	Exemption	1637	was	granted	on September	12,	1972	and	was	last	amended	by	Exemption	7897B	on	September	2,	2008.	Under Exemption	No.	7897B	the	NBAA	is	granted	an	exemption	from	14	CFR	91.409(a)	and	91.501(a) to	permit	NBAA	Membe rs	to	operate	small	civil	airplanes	and	helicopters	of	U.S.	registry	under the	operating	rules	of	14	CFR	91.503	through	91.535	and	to	select	and	use	an	inspection program	described	in	14	CFR	91.409(f).	In	addition,	helicopter	operations	are	not	required	to comply	with	the	minimum	safe	altitude	rules	of	14	CFR	91.515(a),	provided	these	operations comply	with	the	minimum	safe	altitude	requirements	of	14	CFR	91.119.

The	original	justification	for	this	ex emption	has	been	confirmed	by	38 years	of	experience.

Pet itioner	is	not	aware	of	any	incidents	or	accidents	attributable	to	faulty	maintenance	or inspection	practices	involving	aircraft	operated	under	this	exemption.	There	is	evidence	that	this exemption	has	contributed	materially	to	the	increased	safety	of	smal l	airplane	and	helicopter operations	by	permitting	utilization	of	continuous	inspection	procedures.

The	FAA	Part	135/125	Aviation	Rulemaking	Committee	(ARC)	reached	consensus	on	a recommendation	document	that	would	incorporate	this	exemption	into	the	Feder al	Aviation Regulations.	NBAA	actively	supported	this	recommendation	and	encourages	the	FAA	to	adopt the	ARC’s	recommendation	in	an	upcoming	rulemaking	initiative,	thereby	eliminating	the	need for	this	exemption	in	the	future.	Until	the	ARC	recommendation is	codified,	however,	this exemption	remains	an	important	component	of	the	increased	safety	of	small	airplane	and helicopter	operations.

Please	contact	me	if	there	is	any	additional	information	we	can	provide	to	support	the processing	of	this	exemption	req uest.

Respectfully	submitted,

Douglas	Carr
Vice	President Safety,	Security	&	Regulation
{"agency":"NCD","generated":"2021-07-20 19:59:15","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2021"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NCD"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["1"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["1"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2021","quarter":"Q3"}
## EP A and Social Sustainability: A Regional Vi ew

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1

Presentation to the National Advisory Committee on

Environmental Policy and Te chnology A. Stanley Meiburg Deputy Regional Administrator EP A Region 4 April 4, 2013

# Sus ta inability and EP A • EP A’ s cultur e looks at “sus ta inability ” in thr ee conte xts (“lenses”) – Community lens – Ecosystem lens – Industrial/manufacturing lens 

### • All r elated, but pr esen t dif fe re ntaspects and in vo lve differ ent communities of pr actice • This can cr eate uncertainty in our language 4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2

# Communities and the Social Pillar • The social pillar has not been EP A’ s cor e his to ric focus – St atutory oblig ations over determine EP A’ s work – EP A’ s his to ric skill sets: scien tis ts, engineers, atto rneys – EP A’ s his to ric to ols: r egulation and enfor cemen t 4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3

## Wh y The Social Pillar Ma tte rst o EP A • Mission: Pr ot ect Human Health and the En vir onmen t – Re quir es man y t ools, not jus t our stat utory ones – Our cor e t ools ar e essen tial, but not sufficien t – Vo luntary actions ar e import an t to our mission as well as r equir ed ones – Other partners ha ve t ools we don’t 4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 4

# The Social Pillar Challeng es EP A • Ex amples: – Community “a sks” e xc eed our authority – Community “a sks” e xc eed our re sour ces – Te chnical s ta ndar ds do not generate community trus t – Community pr oblems ar e outside our jurisdiction 4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 5

## The WayAhead: Collabor at iv e

Pa rtnerships • Pa rtnerships ca n r eframe the pr oblem • Pa rtnerships of

fe r mor e t ools • Pa rtnerships lev erage r esour ces • Pa rtnerships translat e EP A - speak • Pa rtnerships te ach lessons • Pa rtnerships bring understa nding 4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 6

# EP A as a Con ve nor/F acilit ato r • Consis te nt with our mission • Re quir es augmen te d skill sets – Communications – Social and beha vioral sciences 

### • Obs ta cles – St atutory mandates – Broader view of our re sponsibilities – Re sour ces 4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7
#### HINTON v. STATE.

No. 21446.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1941.

Sisco & Sisco, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Apellant was convicted in the district court of Collin County on. a charge of *799kidnapping and his punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The proceedings appear regular and the facts are sufficient to warrant the conviction. No statement of facts or hills of exception are presented to us and there is nothing for this court to review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
International Programs

The Department of the Treasury’s FY 2024 budget request for International Programs is included 

in the State, Foreign Operations, and Other Related Programs Appropriation. 

Treasury’s International Programs Justification of Appropriations can be found at the following:

https://home.treasury.gov/about/budget-financial-reporting-planning-and-performance/budgetrequestannual-performance-plan-and-reports/treasury-international-programs-justification-ofappropriations
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM GEOSCIENCE FORM 10-Q/A 1ST QUARTER 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCES TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     47,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,957
<PP&E>                                          25,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,017
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,946
<SALES>                                         29,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           17,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (98)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (218)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cr-00366-M Document 92 Filed 02/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 161
Appendix B

Ozone Sensitivity in 

Atlanta in Relation to 

the SEMAP Sensitivity 

Study

1 Data File Included in Electronic Copy Only
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 233 (Monday, December 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30746]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2000, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of permit 
applications received. A permit was issued on November 18, 2000 to the 
following applicant: Colin M. Harris, Permit No. 2001-023.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30746 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00524-CR

Kenneth Nash Neu

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (0491203D)

December 6, 2012

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
2

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00524-CR

KENNETH NASH NEU APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

In 1993, Appellant Kenneth Nash Neu pleaded guilty to indecency with a 

child, and the trial court sentenced him to thirty-five years’ incarceration.2 He 

filed a notice of appeal in the trial court in October 2012, and the notice refers to 

pending motions Appellant had filed in the trial court.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2Appellant also pleaded true to enhancement and habitual offender 

allegations.
3

On November 6, 2012, we notified Appellant of our concern that we lacked 

jurisdiction over this appeal because the trial court has not entered any 

appealable orders, and we informed Appellant that we would dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed 

a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Although Appellant filed 

a response, it does not raise grounds for continuing this attempted direct appeal.3

Because we generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal in a criminal 

case only when there has been a judgment of conviction, and because the trial 

court has not entered an appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

1996, no pet.).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 6, 2012

 

3

To the extent that Appellant seeks to appeal the trial court’s alleged 

refusal to rule on the pending motions, he cannot do so via direct appeal.
Department of the Treasury Quarterly FOIA Report

Fiscal Year 2024, Quarter Q1

1. Ten Oldest Pending Requests: 10

2. Ten Oldest Requests Closed: 0

3. Agency Component Abbreviations

Component 

Abbreviation Component Name

DO Departmental Offices

TTB Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

BEP Bureau of Engraving and Printing

OCC Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

FinCEN Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

Fiscal Service Bureau of the Fiscal Service

MINT United States Mint

TIGTA Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration

IRS Internal Revenue Service - Headquarters Office

Agency / 

Component

Number of requests 

backlogged

Number of requests 

processed

Number of requests 

received

DO 1427 150 181
TTB 19 25 34

BEP 31 19 29

OCC 30 428 421

FinCEN6 74 62

Fiscal Service2 97 84

MINT 1298 35

TIGTA1 85 86

IRS 1107 1462 1827
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Brent, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a *564judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), rendered May 18, 1989, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.