alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BENNINGFIELD et al. v. BENNINGFIELD.

No. 9074.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Oct. 8, 1941.

Fred O. Jaye, of DeLeon, and Oscar Callaway, of Comanche, for appellants.

No briefs filed for appellee.

McClendon, justice.

Appeal from an ex parte interlocutory order appointing a receiver. The original order appointing a receiver was signed by the judge and filed with the clerk on May 9, 1940; thereafter, on May 15, 1940, another order was entered reciting that the receiver so appointed had failed to qualify, and another receiver was named with the same powers and duties as in the original appointment. The appeal bond was filed June 1, 1940. In order to give this court jurisdiction the bond must be filed within twenty days after the order of appointment. R.C.S., Art. 2250, Subd. 1. This right of appeal is given only from the order of appointment, and therefore is limited to that order. The effect of the second order was merely a change of personnel. The original order was appealable from the moment of its entry, regardless of whether the designated receiver qualified or was removed. This is clearly the effect of the decisions in McFarlane v. Greenameyer, Tex.Civ.App., 199 S.W. 304, and American, etc., Ins. Co. v. Valley, etc., Canal Co., Tex.Civ.App., 209 S.W. 438, error refused. As pointed out by Chief Justice Pleasants in the former, of these cases, the right of appeal is given to test the validity of the order taking custody of the property by a receiver, not the propriety of the particular selection of the receiver so appointed. To quote [199 S.W. 305]: “We cannot bring ourselves to believe that it is the intention of the Legislature, in the enactment of this l&w, to give a right of appeal every time a receiver is appointed *828in the course of an administration of property by a court through a receivership. If, whenever a receiver dies, resigns, or is removed, or another is appointed to take his place, the parties can appeal from such appointment, the administration of the property by the court would be seriously embarrassed.” Here the original order, which brought the property under administration by the court, was entered twenty-two days before the appeal bond was filed, and therefore did not confer jurisdiction upon this court.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29986]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY


Renewal of Charter and Meeting of Drug Control Research, Data, 
and Evaluation Committee

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 
2 and 41 CFR 101-6.1013, the Office of National Drug Control Policy 
renewed the charter of the Drug Control Research, Data, and Evaluation 
Committee on October 16, 2000. The renewed charter is available for 
viewing through the Library of Congress and the United States General 
Services Administration.
    A meeting of the Drug Control Research, Data, and Evaluation 
Committee will be held on December 7, 2000 at the Office of National 
Drug Control Policy in the 5th Floor Conference Room, 750 17th Street 
NW, 7th Floor, Washington, DC. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. 
on Thursday December 7th and adjourn at 4:00 p.m.
    The agenda will include: The National Research Council Study of 
ONDCP's Data and Research for Policy on Illegal Drugs; the National 
Drug Control Strategy's Performance Measures of Effectiveness; the 
Medicaid IMD Exclusion; Substance Abuse Treatment Parity; Prevention 
Principles; Neuroimaging and Treatment Technology; and Using technology 
to combat drug-related crime. There will be an opportunity for public 
comment from 11:30 a.m. until 12:00 noon on Thursday, December 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please direct any questions to Linda 
V. Priebe, Attorney-Advisor, (202) 395-6622, Office of National Drug 
Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 
20503.

Linda V. Priebe,
Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 00-29986 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3180-02-P
#### 40 Flatbush Realty Associates et al., Respondents, v Howard Cortlandt St., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants, and New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

In an action to foreclose mortgages on real property, the defendants Howard Cortlandt St., Inc., and Manhattan Cortlandt Joint Venture separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), entered December 5, 1989, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to approve a lease modification agreement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendant Howard Cortlandt St., Inc. (hereinafter Cortlandt), is the record owner of premises located at 40 Flatbush Avenue in Brooklyn. Beginning in 1971, Cortlandt leased portions of the building to the defendant New York City Transit Authority. By the terms of the various lease agreements, the Transit Authority’s lease was to expire in 1998. The plaintiff 40 Flatbush Realty Associates is the current holder of a first mortgage on the subject premises. The plaintiff JSF Realty Associates is the current holder of second and fourth mortgages on the premises. Both plaintiffs acquired their mortgages by assignment from their predecessors in interest after Cortlandt defaulted on the mortgages.

Under the express terms of the first mortgage, as well as an assignment of leases, the first mortgagee was given the right to enter upon the mortgaged premises and lease any portion of the building, as well as to enforce, cancel, or modify any existing leases on the building upon the owner’s default. Accordingly, we agree with the Supreme Court that it was entirely proper for the plaintiffs and the Transit Authority to enter into an agreement modifying the Transit Authority’s lease. In addition, since the building was in need of substantial repairs, the modification agreement was commercially *603reasonable to preserve the value of the collateral. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### JAMES v. STATE.

No. 19649.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 6, 1938.

Rehearing, Denied May 18, 1938.

Eddie Roa-rk and R. L. Wade, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of four years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant *402entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial.

No error having been perceived justifying a reversal, the judgment of' the trial court is affirmed^

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

It is our opinion that this cause was properly disposed of in' our original opinion. We see no reason for changing our views herein.

The motion will be overruled.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 205

Designating the week beginning October 31, 1993, as ‘‘National Health

Information Management Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning October 31, 1993, as

‘‘National Health Information Management Week’’.

Whereas accurate, timely, and complete medical records and

related health information are vital in planning and providing for quality health care for the people of the

United States;

Whereas such records and information are vital to providing

health care to an individual beginning at the birth of the

individual and continuing throughout the life of the individual;

Whereas public concern about the quality, appropriateness,

and effectiveness of health care is escalating;
2

•HJ 205 IH

Whereas specific skills in evaluating and reporting the results

of health care are required to provide public accountability;

Whereas equitable third-party reimbursement for health care

is dependent on health information that is collected, analyzed, classified, verified, and disseminated;

Whereas public awareness of patient rights, including the

right of a patient to access the patient’s own medical information, is increasing;

Whereas the needs and requirements for health information

of the health care industry and the use of the information

by the industry are changing rapidly;

Whereas the rate of such changes will continue to increase

as new health care technology is used and new health

care reform policies are promulgated;

Whereas the 35,000 members of the American Health Information Management Association are the health information leaders of the United States; and

Whereas such members have demonstrated commitment to,

and expertise in, health information management: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning October 31, 1993, is designated

4 as ‘‘National Health Information Management Week’’,

5 and the President is authorized and requested to issue a

6 proclamation calling on the people of the United States

7 to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and

8 activities.
3

•HJ 205 IH

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1469 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1469

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to use the facilities of the 
Golden Gate National Recreation Area to develop and implement a program 
to use drought resistant species of plants in the landscaping of public 
                                 lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1993

 Ms. Pelosi (for herself and Mr. Miller of California) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to use the facilities of the 
Golden Gate National Recreation Area to develop and implement a program 
to use drought resistant species of plants in the landscaping of public 
                                 lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE PROJECT TO USE DROUGHT RESISTANT PLANT 
              SPECIES IN CERTAIN LANDSCAPING PROJECTS.

    The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National Park 
Service and utilizing the lands and facilities of the Golden Gate 
National Recreation Area, shall establish a technical assistance 
program to assist universities and nonprofit organizations in the 
development and implementation of projects to use drought resistant 
plant species which require minimal watering and upkeep in landscaping 
applications where the use of such species will be compatible with 
native plant species and conserve scarce water resources. In selecting 
projects to be assisted under the authority of this section, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall give a priority to providing assistance 
to projects which employ and provide educational training and 
experience for young people between the ages of 14 and 23 and which 
will contribute to restoring the native ecology of landscapes which 
have been affected by the introduction of exotic species. There is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as 
may be necessary, to remain available until expended.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the "Partnership") for the period ended September
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 24, 2009
---

Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF SUMMA ENGINEERING INC.



As independent oil and gas consultants, Summa Engineering Inc.
hereby consents to the incorporation by reference of all references to our firm
and information from our reserves report dated January 26, 2011, entitled
American Natural Energy Corporation Reserve Report as of December 31, 2010,
included in or made a part of the American Natural Energy Corporation Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 31, 2011, and our summary
report attached as Exhibit 99.1 to such Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | SUMMA ENGINEERING
      INC.   
|----------------------- | -------------------------------
|March 31, 2011          |                                
|                        | By: _/s/ R.L. Hilbun___________
|                        | R.L. Hilbun, P.E.              
|                        | President                      

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 00-2594, MM Docket No. 00-115; RM-9884] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission, at the request of California Broadcasting, Inc., licensee of station KRCR-TV, substitutes DTV channel 34 for station KRCR-TV's assigned DTV channel 14 at Redding, California.                         *See*65 FR 41036, July 3, 2000. DTV channel 34 can be allotted to Redding at coordinates (40-36-10 N. and 122-39-00 W.) with a power 166, HAAT of 1106 meters, and with a DTV service population of 318 thousand. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.                     

# DATES:

Effective January 9, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-115, adopted November 22, 2000, and released November 24, 2000. The full                           ( print page 70509)                        text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.                 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Television
      - Digital television broadcasting

Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.622

2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments under California, is amended by removing DTV Channel 14 and adding DTV Channel 34 at Redding. 

Federal Communications Commission.

Barbara A. Kreisman,

Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-30012 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# Den Europæiske Unions C 39A/7. f

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 39A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 60. årgang7. februar 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 39A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

60. årgang7. februar 2017

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Øvrige meddelelser |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER |
| | Europa-Kommissionen |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | EF-Sortsmyndigheden — Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på udnævnelse af formand for appelkammeret (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

V   Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Kommissionen

2017/C 39 A/01

EF-Sortsmyndigheden — Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på udnævnelse af formand for appelkammeret (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

V Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Europa-Kommissionen

| 7.2.2017 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 39/1

---

EF-SORTSMYNDIGHEDEN

Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på udnævnelse af formand for appelkammeret

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

EF-Sortsmyndigheden søger en formand for appelkammeret.

Ansøgerne skal være statsborger i en af Den Europæiske Unions medlemslande

Formanden udnævnes af Rådet på grundlag af en liste over ansøgere, som Kommissionen opstiller efter at have indhentet udtalelse fra Sortsmyndighedens administrationsråd. Oplysninger om vederlag kan rekvireres ved henvendelse til appelkammerets sekretariat (Community Plant Variety Office, 3 boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, 49101 Angers Cedex 02, Frankrig). EF-Sortsmyndigheden og Kommissionen fører en aktiv ligestillingspolitik.

Indkaldelsen af interessetilkendegivelser i fuld længde og link til onlineansøgningsskema findes på følgende adresse: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

Ansøgningen skal være modtaget senest den 8. marts 2017 (se nærmere i ansøgningsvejledningen).

---
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 20634.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1939.

W. O. Slattery, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record before this court contains neither bills of exception nor statement of facts. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT
                        --------------------------------

I, Mitchell  Gerstein,  Chief Financial  Officer of Synergy  Brands,  Inc. ("the
Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1.   The Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company  for the period
              ended  December 31, 2003 ("the  Report")  fully  complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
              Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 30, 2004


                                             /s/ Mitchell Gerstein
                                             ----------------------
                                                 Mitchell Gerstein
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                    EX-31.2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1643 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1643

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the Commissioner 
   of the Internal Revenue Service from rehiring any employee of the 
 Internal Revenue Service who was involuntarily separated from service 
                            for misconduct.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2017

 Mr. Burr (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Heller, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. 
Enzi) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                      to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the Commissioner 
   of the Internal Revenue Service from rehiring any employee of the 
 Internal Revenue Service who was involuntarily separated from service 
                            for misconduct.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Integrity in the IRS 
Workforce Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REHIRING FORMER IRS EMPLOYEES WHO WERE 
              INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED FOR MISCONDUCT.

    (a) In General.--Section 7804 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Prohibition on Rehiring Employees Involuntarily Separated.--
The Commissioner may not employ any individual previously employed by 
the Commissioner who was removed for misconduct under this subchapter 
or chapter 43 or chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code, or whose 
employment was terminated under section 1203 of the Internal Revenue 
Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (26 U.S.C. 7804 note).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 
        any employee removed from employment before, on, or after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Exception.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        not apply to any employee who is employed by the Internal 
        Revenue Service as of the date of the enactment of this Act 
        with respect to any removal for misconduct which occurred 
        before such date.
                                 <all>
```