alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00067-Z-BR

§

ROY AMBRE JONES (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

ROY AMBRE JONES (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining ROY AMBRE JONES (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that ROY AMBRE JONES (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) -

POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and have sentence imposed accordingly. After 

being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: December 22, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00067-Z-BR Document 67 Filed 12/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 162
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.'S JUNE 30, 2000, ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FILINGS. DOLLARS ARE IN THOUSANDS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,101
<INVENTORY>                                     55,340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,477
<PP&E>                                          22,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,551
<BONDS>                                         41,075
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,809
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,684
<SALES>                                        189,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,951
<CGS>                                          121,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,089
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49


</TABLE>
# OAR Box 1796 Prepped byKeeia Richards
Document

Number: 

# 57 ) VI-B- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/20084:20:37

PM Sheet 57 of 107 P. 1P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B- 8 Thi s documen t

ha s bee nmove dt o IV-E-2 6 a t th e reques t

o f th e projec t officer . I t

wa s incorrectl y categoriz e originally .
## EPA Reg. No. 71368-60

Vol. 2
#### Daniel Aviles, an Infant, by Olinda Aviles, His Mother *406and Natural Guardian, et al., Appellants, v CYO Whitestone Swimming Pool et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), entered May 19, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion for a change of venue.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

Upon a motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) based upon convenience of the witnesses, the movant must establish the identity of the witnesses who allegedly will be inconvenienced, their willingness to testify, and the nature of their anticipated testimony. Absent such a showing, such a motion should be denied *(see, Alexandre v Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.,*150 AD2d 742; *Ferrigno v General Motors Corp.,*134 AD2d 479; *Greene v Hillcrest Gen. Hosp.,*130 AD2d 621; *Brevetti v Roth,*114 AD2d 877; *Williamsburg Steel Prods. Co. v Shelving-Manning, Inc.,*90 AD2d 550). The defendants failed to satisfy this burden and, accordingly, the granting of the motion was improper. Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard F. Allen, Sr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Ronco Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cause such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2005.

/s/  Richard F. Allen, Sr.

Chief Executive Officer
Case 4:22-cr-00251-O Document 22 Filed 09/21/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 47
Case 4:22-cr-00251-O Document 22 Filed 09/21/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 48
#### BAHN et al. v. SAVAGE et al.

No. 23875.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Dec. 7, 1938.

Butler & Grimes, of Rob$town, for plaintiffs in error.

Sidney P. Chandler, of Corpus Christi, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error in this case involves the sole proposition that the election of the Special Judge who presided in the hearing of this case was void because he was elected by viva voce vote, and not by ballot, as provided by Article 1888 of the Revised Statutes of 1925. The order contained in the transcript is as follows: “On this the 8th day of August, A. D. 1938, the Honorable Cullen W. Briggs, Judge of this District Court, being absent, the following Practicing Lawyers, having been present, towit, T. S. Cyrus, J. Marvin Ericson, A. J. Pope, E. B. Grimes, Roger C. Butler, I. M. Singer, Lee Lytton, Thomas Newton, Alston Terry, Allen V. Davis, J. M. Wilson, Mrs. Margaret Brown, Ed Williams, S. P. Chandler, Hal Rachal, Leon Newman and Roy Cason, and the Sheriff having duly made proclamation at the Courthouse door that the election of a Special Judge of this Court was about to be made by the practicing lawyers present; and Ed Williams, practicing attorney, having been elected Temporary Chairman of' the meeting of the Practicing Lawyers present, and Allen V. Davis, having been duly nominated as Special Judge aforesaid, and a motion having been duly made and seconded that nominations cease and that Allen V. Davis, be elected Special Judge by acclamation, and said motion having been passed unanimously, the Chairman declared Allen V. Davis elected Special Judge by the unanimous vote of all the practicing lawyers present, and the oath, prescribed by law was duly administered to the said Allen V. Davis, as Special District Judge, 117th Judicial District, Nueces County Texas, by the Clerk of this Court.”

In our opinion the above order shows a substantial compliance with Articles 1887 to 1892, both inclusive, R.S.C. of Texas 1925. Article 1892 provides, in effect, that a substantial compliance with the above statutes shall be sufficient. In our opinion the above order shows such substantial compliance.

For the reasons above stated the application is refused.
# Official Journal C 90/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.090.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5527 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.090.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 90

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5527 March 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 090/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6505 — STE/UTC/JV) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 090/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6505 — STE/UTC/JV) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 090/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2012/C 090/03 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment (1) | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 090/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2012/C 090/03

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment (1)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000943904
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V, L.P., SERIES 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,530,527
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,530,527
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,109,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,398,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,109,276
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    17,039
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       27,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   170,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (181,109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (181,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (181,109)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (9.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apex SilverMines Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 
| \s\ Jeffrey G. Clevenger                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey G. Clevenger                              |
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |
| November 6, 2006                                  |
|                                              |
|                                              |
| \s\ Gerald J. Malys                               |   |
| Gerald J. Malys                                   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| November 6, 2006                                  |

 

----
# Gainesvill e Are a CHAMBE R O F COMMERC E n '=/Vi " 

### Ql
30 0 E Univorsil

y AvG., Suit

e 10 0 P O 80x118 7 Gainesvill e F L 3260 2 (352)334-710 0 Fax:(352)334-714 1 www.GainesvilIeChamber.co m August 17,201 0
Aloli a Le y Associat e Directo r Smal l Coinimuiit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Progia m(SCASDP) nlohn.lCYtajtiot.go

v Re : Smal l Coiiimunlt} ' Ai r Servic e Developuten

t Gran t Dea r Ms
. Ley , O n behal f of th e GaiiicKvill

e AreaChambe

r o f Commerc e an

d ou r economic developmen

t team , thcCounci l fo

r Economi c Outreach , 1 full y suppor t Gainesvill e Regiona

l Airport' s reques t

fo r aSmal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t gran t t o assis t wit h marketing th e ne

w America

n Eagl e Airline s servic e betwee

n Gainesvill e and Miam

i an d th e existing , loca

l ai r canriefs , Delt

aAi r Line s an d U S Ainvays
. American' s ne

w servic e wil

t allow th e busines s connnunit y t o b e mor e productive , ultimatel

y improving efficiency and savin g money . Man y businesse s choos e t

o local e i n Gainesvill e du e t

o astabl e economi c cnvironn)en t an d outstanding qualit y o f life
. Ou r member s hav e expressed anee d fo r ai r servic e t o Sout h Florida
. Th e leve

l o f ai r seivic e ha s bee

n a n ongoin g matte

r of concer n an d could no

t suppoit (h e continued increas e i

n demand
. I n additio n t

o convenien

t acces s t o sout

h Florida , American' s extensiv e domesti c an d internationa

l rout e structur e fro mth e Miam

i hu b wil l provid e ne w travel option s an

d agreate r leve l of frequenc y fo r bot h busines s an

d leisur e travelers
. A growin g numbe

r of information technology , biotechnolog y an d professiona

l engineeiin g servic e finns hav e located i

n Gainesvill e an

d wil l requir e agreater leve l o f air servic e t o conduc t business
. Du

e t o th e critica l importanc e of

qualit y air servic e fo r our region an d ou r members , w

e ar c committed t

o suppoilin g American' s ne

w servic e an

d paiincrln g wit

h the aitpor

t t o (xmlinu c improvement s i

n air service
. Again , I urg e yo

u t o procee d wit

h approving th e Airpoi l Authority' s reques t fo r agiant t o assis t wit h marketin g effoil s fo

r th e nex t tw o years . I

f yo u hav e an y question s abou

t ou r travel needs , pleas e don' t hesitat e t o contac t me . Sincerely ,

Bren t Christense n Presiden t an d CE O



## ACCREDITE D I n 2009 , th e Gainesvill e Are a Chambe ro f Commerce wa s awarde d 5-Sta r Accreditatio n fro m th e U.S

. Chambe ro f Gommerce , a n hono rrecognizin g I t a s ^ bein g amon g th e to p 1 % o f chamber

s nationwide

. Pag e 5 7
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1271 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1271

                 For the relief of Peter J. Montagnoli.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1993

 Mr. Bilbray introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Peter J. Montagnoli.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
the Treasury is authorized and directed to pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Peter J. Montagnoli of Las 
Vegas, Nevada, the sum of $8,000, in full satisfaction of all his 
claims against the United States for reimbursement for the expenses he 
incurred from July 1970 through May 7, 1973, in securing the 
reimbursement of his disability insurance benefits under the Social 
Security Act which were terminated in September 1970.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

VICTOR KEENAN LEMMONS, JR.,

Petitioner

v.

JACK DANERI, ESQ.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 105 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2019, the “Application for Extraordinary 

Relief/Suspension of the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus” is DENIED.