alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          72,991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,574
<PP&E>                                       1,020,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,743
<SALES>                                        478,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               480,994
<CGS>                                          154,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                241,841
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            241,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   241,841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   181.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   181.75
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.10 Form of Restricted Stock Award [Name of Executive]
[Title of Executive] Restricted
Stock Award*
    
    _____Grant Date:
    
    __/__/200_* The restricted stock award will vest at retirement at or
after age 65, death, disability, or change in control.  The
shares will be forfeited if your employment ends prior to this
time. Additional terms are included in the 1997 Long Term Incentive
Plan and the Policies adopted for its administration.Note: Restricted shares granted to Messrs. Hammonds,
Cochran, Weaver and Struthers (other than shares granted in lieu of a
portion of cash bonuses) in 2003 and prior years vest on
December 1 of the year that includes the tenth anniversary of
grant, or sooner upon the recipient's retirement, death or disability
or upon a change of control of the Corporation.
   Form of Restricted Stock Award (in lieu of bonus) [Name of Executive]
[Title of Executive] 200_ Bonus Salary:
    
    $________200_ Cash Bonus:
    
    $________200_ Restricted Stock Bonus:
    
    $____________(1)Grant Date:
    
    __/__/200_(1) Represents the number of restricted shares based upon the
closing price of $___ on ______ __, 200_. The shares will vest
__% on each year beginning with _____ __, 200_ and on each of
the next ____ anniversaries. The shares will vest sooner in
the event of death, disability, retirement at or after age 65
or change in control of the Corporation. The shares will be
forfeited if your employment ends prior to this time.
Additional terms are included in the 1997 Long Term Incentive
Plan and the policies adopted for its administration.
Exhibit 11

                     FOOTSTAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                            PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED
                     ($ in millions, except per share data)

                                            Three Months     Nine Months
                                               Ended            Ended
                                          September 27,     September 27,
                                               1997             1997
                                          -------------     -------------

  Primary earnings per share:
     Net income                                  $18.8            $38.9
                                            ==========       ==========

     Average common shares 
        outstanding                         28,384,855       29,751,521
     Dilutive effect of 
        outstanding options                     91,710           78,946
                                            ----------       ----------
                                            28,476,565       29,830,467
                                            ==========       ==========

     Earnings per common 
        share--primary                           $0.66            $1.30
                                            ==========       ==========

  Fully diluted earnings 
     per share:
     Net income                                  $18.8            $38.9
                                            ==========       ==========

     Average common shares 
        outstanding                         28,384,855       29,751,521
     Dilutive effect of 
        outstanding options                    105,205          105,205
                                            ----------       ----------
                                            28,490,060       29,856,726
                                            ==========       ==========

     Earnings per common 
        share--fully diluted                     $0.66            $1.30
                                            ==========       ==========
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1530

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for improved

delivery of and access to home care and to increase the utilization

of such care as an alternative to institutionalization.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1993

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself and Mrs. BENTLEY) introduced the

following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Energy

and Commerce and Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide

for improved delivery of and access to home care and

to increase the utilization of such care as an alternative

to institutionalization.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Home Care

5 Choice Fairness and Improvement Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 1530 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF SPOUSAL IMPOVERISHMENT

2 RULES UNDER MEDICAID TO SPOUSES OF IN3 DIVIDUALS RECEIVING HOME OR COMMU4 NITY-BASED SERVICES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—

6 (1) APPLICATION OF RULES.—Section

7 1924(h)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

8 1396r–5(h)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘or who

9 (at the option of the State) is described in section

10 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI), and’’ and inserting ‘‘or is re11 ceiving medical assistance under section

12 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI), and’’.

13 (b) INCREASE IN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS AL14 LOWED TO RECEIVE HOME OR COMMUNITY-BASED SERV15 ICES.—Section 1915(c)(10) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

16 1396n(c)(10)) is amended by striking ‘‘200’’ and inserting

17 ‘‘300’’.

18 (c) INFORMING PATIENTS OF AVAILABILITY OF

19 HOME CARE.—

20 (1) MEDICARE PATIENTS.—Section 1866(a)(1)

21 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)) is amended—

22 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub23 paragraph (P);

24 (B) by striking the period at the end of

25 subparagraph (Q) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and
3

•HR 1530 IH

1 (C) by adding at the end the following new

2 subparagraph:

3 ‘‘(R) in the case of hospitals, to inform in4 dividuals of the availability of home care serv5 ices under title XIX and, if in a State operating

6 under a waiver under section 1915(c), to inform

7 individuals of the availability of home or com8 munity-based services in such State.’’.

9 (2) MEDICAID PATIENTS.—Section 1902(w)(1)

10 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(w)(1)) is amended—

11 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub12 paragraph (D);

13 (B) by striking the period at the end of

14 subparagraph (E) and by inserting ‘‘; and’’;

15 and

16 (C) by adding at the end the following new

17 subparagraph:

18 ‘‘(F) to inform such individuals of the

19 availability of home care services under this

20 title and, if in a State operating under a waiver

21 under section 1915(c), to inform such individ22 uals of the availability of home or community23 based services in such State.’’.

Æ
#### Annette Walsh, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bridget Walsh, Deceased, Respondent, v J.W. Mays, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant J.W. Mays, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated January 30, 1989, which denied its motion for a change of venue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A motion to change venue for the convenience of the witnesses must be supported by a statement setting forth the names of the witnesses involved, that they have agreed to testify and what their testimony might be. Absent such a showing, the motion should be denied *(see, Alexandre v Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.,*150 AD2d 742; *Ferrigno v General Motors Corp.,*134 AD2d 479; *Greene v Hillcrest Gen. Hosp.,*130 AD2d 621). The appellant has not satisfied this burden and, accordingly, denial of the motion was proper. We further note that it has failed to explain its inordinately long, six-year delay in making the motion for this change of venue and find that, under the circumstances, the motion was not made "within a reasonable time,” as required by CPLR 511 (a). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM MAURICE SADDLER, a/k/a Reece, a/k/a King,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-cr-00251-FL-1; 5:21-cv-00016-FL)

Submitted: October 26, 2023 Decided: November 13, 2023

Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Maurice Saddler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6053 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

William Maurice Saddler seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Saddler’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Saddler has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Saddler’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6053 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/13/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1475

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified estate

and gift tax credits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mr. SUNDQUIST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the unified estate and gift tax credits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN UNIFIED ESTATE AND GIFT TAX

4 CREDITS.

5 (a) ESTATE TAX CREDIT.—

6 (1) Subsection (a) of section 2010 of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to unified credit

8 against estate tax) is amended by striking

9 ‘‘$192,800’’ and inserting ‘‘the applicable credit

10 amount’’.
2

•HR 1475 IH

1 (2) Section 2010 of such Code is amended by

2 redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d) and by

3 inserting after subsection (b) the following new sub4 section:

5 ‘‘(c) APPLICABLE CREDIT AMOUNT.—For purposes

6 of this section—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The applicable credit

8 amount is the amount of the tentative tax which

9 would be determined under the rate schedule set

10 forth in section 2001(c) if the amount with respect

11 to which such tentative tax is to be computed were

12 $850,000.

13 ‘‘(2) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS.—In the

14 case of any decedent dying in a calendar year after

15 1994, the $850,000 amount set forth in paragraph

16 (1) shall be increased by an amount equal to—

17 ‘‘(A) $850,000, multiplied by

18 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter19 mined under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar

20 year by substituting ‘calendar year 1994’ for

21 ‘calendar year 1989’ in subparagraph (B)

22 thereof.

23 Any increase determined under the preceding sen24 tence shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of

25 $1,000.’’
3

•HR 1475 IH

1 (3) Paragraph (1) of section 6018(a) of such

2 Code is amended by striking ‘‘$600,000’’ and insert3 ing ‘‘$850,000 (adjusted as provided in section

4 2010(c)(2)’’.

5 (b) UNIFIED GIFT TAX CREDIT.—Paragraph (1) of

6 section 2505(a) of such Code is amended by striking

7 ‘‘$192,800’’ and inserting ‘‘the applicable credit amount

8 in effect under section 2010(c) for such calendar year’’.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to the estates of decedents dying,

11 and gifts made, after December 31, 1993.

Æ
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1037 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a five-year pilot 

project to test the feasibility and advisability of expanding the scope 

of certain qualifying work-study activities under title 38, United States 

Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2009 

Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN (for herself and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a 

five-year pilot project to test the feasibility and advisability of expanding the scope of certain qualifying workstudy activities under title 38, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pilot College Work 

5 Study Programs for Veterans Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1037 IH

1 SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR PILOT PROGRAM FOR ON-CAMPUS 

2 WORK-STUDY POSITIONS. 

3 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PILOT PROGRAM.—The Sec4 retary of Veterans Affairs shall conduct a five-year pilot 

5 project to test the feasibility and advisability of expanding 

6 the scope of qualifying work-study activities for purposes 

7 of section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, in8 cluding work-study positions available on site at edu9 cational institutions. 

10 (b) TYPE OF WORK-STUDY POSITIONS.—The work11 study positions referred to in subsection (a) may include 

12 positions in academic departments (including positions as 

13 tutors or research, teaching, and lab assistants) and in 

14 student services (including positions in career centers and 

15 financial aid, campus orientation, cashiers, admissions, 

16 records, and registration offices). 

17 (c) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall issue regula18 tions to carry out the pilot project under this section, in19 cluding regulations providing for the supervision of work20 study positions referred to in subsection (a) by appropriate 

21 personnel of the Department. 

22 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

23 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary 

24 $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2013 

25 to carry out the pilot project under this section. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
k I UitniA mxak

}iu <Jo/5~

t^iApaok * oi- it-oofl*-- ^l

~Jxiai Cmy* MSHlb.

WotS7o_J)&d#> AnpiaL

i^fiWi M< iJlrO Coud" •'

£anu.5 t&cr jyvdiL 'ty+KUhGoK' ;&^hiLd<uJr a(02O/t-

(\um.~-k>ik (jjJm do*

~tk moLrtf

^o\^

RECEIVED

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

I© 09 2015

~ Absl Aeosta, Glerk •~

N/A( VtefteA JKrijJM -fj\o V^ dill ti "MiuffOu t

p. JJhjJ^'JMM^ • U ^ ... t

doJr Kao 6l

CJ* D31^fl £i*J3..

looiJ Lawr sir (^ohjio

ItfJQZ.

FILED IN

XOURTOFCRIMINAtrAPPEALS

-FEB~t1-^"

Abel Acosta, CierK
V4jlr *>*

milicdiuL a/ Mjte<tW~J\tdc!X8tioL^

v/ ^A"/|L kDsjssU- ^J)jUMj)io- X/JL^ro Cause-,

"""^u&f dowrtrp <=yj(v WMfi dvdu. OucIJud ow£ Quik&wid~

&tt Ajap&k^k WJl tko dicJkofi&~ •^J"Mai /jjlMx Jwfv^

Coibnutd -ULutL chd -sad Acfe

Qal Uua W cmoh. U v

f ,

£ot<

(j^uL^^dih&LJ

,j)(f-fWcAf ^o Si

lOD jJ_Lfo\MLr 5r (fOhjio

trldm.^i %\oitji^du {&tt-Mud Ar.(ZJtiscJ iiJfrX..^.M- J?v' (Mj3*J»(,^w.dj>.Z£,l
fafyrJoif

U,dfj M ^StAutUL

a.

ifou. mcL Crnit^ C.&ptU Jih. &k>(X. jbijjtidllux&waxd &C

^h. jftflb ~*Qd® %M, tiL-tha 41* ofofof 4*Lf^ . doi*.

dcJ^^iZ^ J\n^U

Vy atl\<v 'hag, *P<iascL

jkjk^r^-v$4<

ah* b3i4hf\ hcS * /**q

loo kJ UmrSt.

ft, -.Qorihyt 1(tIQI-
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 127

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and make permanent

the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. GRANDY, and Mr. RANGEL) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

JUNE 2, 1993

Additional sponsors: Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SKAGGS, Mr. WALSH, Mr. HOLDEN,

Mrs. BENTLEY, Mr. VENTO, Mr. REED, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MAZZOLI, Mr.

NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. TALENT, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. LAFALCE,

Mrs. UNSOELD, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. SWIFT, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. STOKES, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr. OBERSTAR, Ms. PELOSI, Mr.

KLUG, Mr. NADLER, Ms. SHEPHERD, Mr. HYDE, Mr. OLVER, Mr.

WYDEN, Mr. GLICKMAN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. BONIOR, Mr.

MARTINEZ, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SYNAR, Mr. KOPETSKI, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. NEAL of North Carolina, Mr. MANTON, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr.

SUNDQUIST, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HUTTO, Mr. KOLBE, Mr.

KYL, Mrs. MORELLA, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Mr. OXLEY, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr.

HASTERT, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. QUINN, Mr. SHAW, Mr. SOLOMON,

Mr. WELDON, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr.

TORRICELLI, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr.

SANTORUM, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. COBLE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. COLEMAN,

Mr. CAMP, Mr. CRANE, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. EMERSON, Mr.

FAWELL, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. GALLO, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr.

PICKETT, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. BROWDER, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. BARCIA, and Mr. KLINK

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore
2

•HR 127 SC

and make permanent the exclusion for employer-provided

educational assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Educational

5 Assistance Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 127 of the Internal Reve8 nue Code of 1986 (relating to educational assistance pro9 grams) is amended by striking subsection (d) and by re10 designating subsection (e) as subsection (d).

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of

12 section 103(a) of the Tax Extension Act of 1991 is hereby

13 repealed.

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

16 December 31, 1991.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35

                                2006-1 AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                                 STEELCASE INC.
                           INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
       (MOST RECENTLY AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 1, 2002)
                            ------------------------

         This 2006-1 Amendment to the STEELCASE INC. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
("Plan") is adopted by Steelcase Inc. ("Employer"). The amendment is effective
as of January 1, 2005.

         Pursuant to Section 18.1 of the Plan, Employer amends the Plan as
follows:

                                       A.

         A new Section 22.6 is added as follows:

         22.6     AMERICAN JOBS CREATION ACT OF 2004. No payment of any amount
treated as deferred under the Plan on or after January 1, 2005 shall be made to
a Participant who is a "key employee" as defined in Internal Revenue Code
Section 416(i) for at least six months after the Participant's separation from
service with Employer, unless such payment is specifically permitted by Treasury
regulations issued under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Notwithstanding
any provisions of the Plan to the contrary, the Plan will be operated in
compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A with respect to amounts
treated as deferred on or after January 1, 2005.

                                       B.

         In all other respects, the Plan is unchanged.

         IN WITNESS OF WHICH, Employer executes this 2006-1 Amendment to the
Plan.

                                    STEELCASE INC.


Dated:  January 20, 2005            By  /s/ Nancy W. Hickey
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Nancy W. Hickey

                                       Its Senior Vice President, Chief
                                       Administrative Officer