alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 290

Designating June 17, 1994, as ‘‘African-American Men Positive Role Model

Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1993

Miss COLLINS of Michigan (for herself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. ACKERMAN,

Mr. BISHOP, Mr. BLACKWELL, Mrs. BENTLEY, Ms. BROWN of Florida,

Ms. BYRNE, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CLAY, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. CLYBURN,

Mr. CONYERS, Ms. DANNER, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr.

FOGLIETTA, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. FIELDS of Louisiana, Mr. FORD of Tennessee, Mr. FROST, Ms. FURSE, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr.

HOCHBRUECKNER, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms.

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. KOPETSKI, Mr.

KANJORSKI, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mrs. LLOYD, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr.

MARTINEZ, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mrs. MORELLA, Ms.

MCKINNEY, Mrs. MEEK, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. MINK, Ms. MOLINARI,

Ms. NORTON, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey, Mr.

QUILLEN, Mr. QUINN, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. DE LUGO, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr.

RAVENEL, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. SLATTERY, Mr. STOKES, Mr. TORRES, Mr.

TOWNS, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. TEJEDA, Mr. TUCKER, Mr.

TRAFICANT, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. VALENTINE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr.

WASHINGTON, Ms. WATERS, Mr. WHEAT, Mr. WILSON, and Mr. WYNN)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating June 17, 1994, as ‘‘African-American Men

Positive Role Model Day’’.
2

•HJ 290 IH

Whereas African-American men have strengthened and contributed to the United States in every aspect of life, including art, science, civil service, military service, athletics, education, business, law, and politics;

Whereas African-American men have played an essential role

as heads of households and pillars of proud and productive African-American families, often in hostile social and

economic environments;

Whereas African-American men have ably assumed community, regional, national, and international leadership

roles, thereby achieving well-deserved recognition for

their contributions and achievements; and

Whereas African-American men continue to serve as strong,

positive role models for the young within their communities, as well as throughout the Nation and the world:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That June 17, 1994, is designated as ‘‘African-American

4 Men Positive Role Model Day’’, and the President is au5 thorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on

6 the people of the United States to observe such day with

7 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Eramet Marietta, Inc. 

Furnace 12 Stack Test 

March 4,2013 

Total Material Weight For the Period (2days) 

Material Ibs 

Anthracite 69800 

BW Coke 142700 

Dolomite 206360 

F2 Sinter 677600 

HC Slag 677600 

Millscale 92400 

Si Dross 107140 

Si Ladle Metal 247340 

SiMn Remelts 135520 

U M K 338800 

Total 2695260 Totallbs 

1347630 Ibs/day 

673.82 NT/day 

28 NT/hour
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1


March 15, 2005


Jason Shrinsky

7792 Trieste Place

Delray Beach, FL 33446


Dear Jason Shrinsky:


Pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. 1999 Stock Option
Plan for NonEmployee Directors (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Nonqualified Stock Option to purchase 50,000 shares
(the “Option”) of Class A common stock as outlined
below.







	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Granted To:	 	Jason Shrinsky
	 
	Grant Date:	 	March 7, 2005
	 
	Options Granted:	 	50,000
	 
	Option Price per Share:	 	$10.79	 	Total Cost to Exercise:	 	$539,500.00
	 
	Expiration Date:	 	March 7, 2015, unless
terminated earlier.
	 
	Vesting Schedule:	 	20% immediately, 20% each year as
follows:
	 
	 	 	10,000 on 03/07/2005
	 	 	10,000 on 03/07/2006
	 	 	10,000 on 03/07/2007
	 	 	10,000 on 03/07/2008
	 	 	10,000 on 03/07/2009
	 
	Transferability:	 	Not transferable except in
accordance with the Plan.







	 	 	 
	 	Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
	 
	 	By: 	/s/
Joseph A. García
	 	 	Joseph A. García





By my signature below, I
hereby acknowledge receipt of this Option granted on the date shown
above, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions of
the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and
agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and
the Plan.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature: 	/s/ Jason Shrinsky	 	Date: 	3/17/05
	 	Jason Shrinsky	 	 	 





 

 



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SBS TOWER	 	2601 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, PENTHOUSE II
COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA 33133	 	TEL (305) 441-6901	 	FAX (305) 446-5148
Union Calendar No. 455

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1474

[Report No. 103–810]

A BILL

To increase the irrigable acreage for the San Another purposes. gelo Federal reclamation project, Texas, and for

OCTOBER 3, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 455

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1474

[Report No. 103–810]

To increase the irrigable acreage for the San Angelo Federal reclamation

project, Texas, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mr. SMITH of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

OCTOBER 3, 1994

Additional sponsor: Mr. STENHOLM

OCTOBER 3, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To increase the irrigable acreage for the San Angelo Federal

reclamation project, Texas, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN IRRIGABLE ACREAGE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of the Act enti5 tled ‘‘An Act to provide for the construction by the Sec-
2

•HR 1474 RH

1 retary of the Interior of the San Angelo Federal reclama2 tion project, Texas, and for other purposes’’, approved Au3 gust 16, 1957 (71 Stat. 372), is amended by striking ‘‘ten

4 thousand acres’’ and inserting ‘‘fifteen thousand acres’’.

5 (b) AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT.—The Secretary of

6 the Interior is authorized to amend contract numbered

7 14–06–500–369 to reflect the amendment made by sub8 section (a), except that such amendment shall not be con9 strued to require a change in the proportionate amount

10 of all remaining payments due and payable to the United

11 States by Tom Green County Water Control Improvement

12 District No. 1.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP00-452-000]

Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Site Visit

November 21, 2000.
    On November 30 and December 1, 2000, the staff of the Office of 
Energy Projects (OEP) will be conducting an inspection of Colorado 
Interstate Gas Company's (CIG) Raton Basin Expansion Project in Baca 
and Las Animas Counties, Colorado; Cimarron, Texas, and Beaver 
Counties, Oklahoma; and Morton County, Kansas. The site visit will 
start at 7:30 am on Thursday at the Ambassador Inn at Guymon, Oklahoma 
and follow the proposed route west. Sites to be visited include the 
Cimarron River crossings, the Santa Fe Trail crossing, the Cimarron 
National Grasslands, the proposed Kim Compressor Station, the Keyes 
Compressor Station, and possibly other locations. The site visit on 
Friday will start at 8 am at the proposed Trinidad Compressor Station 
site located off of U.S. Highway 160/350. Representatives of CIG will 
accompany the OEP staff.
    All interested parties may attend, although those planning to 
attend must provide their own transportation.
    For further information, please contact Laura Turner of the 
Commission's Office of Energy Projects at (202) 208-0916.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30201 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
75336 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

November 24, 2000.

The Department of the Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be

received on or before January 2, 2001 to

be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545–0135.

Form Number: IRS Form 1138.

Type of Review: Extension.

Title: Extension of Time for Payment

of Taxes by a Corporation Expecting a

Net Operating Loss Carryback.

Description: Form 1138 is filed by

corporations to request an extension of

time to pay their income taxes,

including estimated taxes. Corporations

may only file for an extension when

they expect a net operating loss

carryback in the tax year and want to

delay the payment of taxes from a prior

tax year.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Estimated Number of Respondents/

Recordkeepers: 2,033.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Respondent/Recordkeeper:

Recordkeeping ............................. 3 hr., 21 min.

Learning about the law or the

form.

42 min.

Preparing and sending the form

to the IRS.

46 min.

Frequency of Response: On occasion.

Estimated Total Reporting/

Recordkeeping Burden: 9,800 hours.

Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear,

Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244,

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20224.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt,

(202) 395–7860, Office of Management

and Budget, Room 10202, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,

Departmental Reports Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–30591 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: July 2, 2015 520209 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of

WAHID A. BAKIR,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: May 5, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________

Lianne S. Pinchuk, Albany County Bar Association, Albany,

for appellant.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City

(Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed March 5, 2014, which ruled that claimant was

disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits

because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. 

Claimant worked for the employer as a truck driver for

approximately 10 weeks. While he was making a delivery to one of

the employer's major customers, he was asked to shut off his

truck engine at the gate in accordance with the customer's

policy. Having experienced some mechanical problems with the

truck, claimant refused to do so and was directed to leave the

customer's premises. The customer complained to claimant's

supervisor, who later confronted claimant about the incident. 

According to the supervisor, claimant became hostile and

argumentative during their discussion and indicated that he would

not comply with the customer's policy. His employment was
-2- 520209 

terminated as a result. Claimant's application for unemployment

insurance benefits was denied and the denial was upheld by an

Administrative Law Judge following a hearing. The Unemployment

Insurance Appeal Board agreed that claimant had engaged in

disqualifying misconduct and affirmed the Administrative Law

Judge's decision. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. Behavior that is contrary to established

policies and detrimental to an employer's interest has been found

to rise to the level of misconduct disqualifying a claimant from

receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see Matter of Bastian

[Commissioner of Labor], 19 AD3d 915, 916 [2005]; Matter of

Chillious [Commissioner of Labor], 3 AD3d 655, 655-656 [2004]). 

Here, it is undisputed that claimant refused to comply with the

customer's policy of shutting off his truck engine and indicated

his unwillingness to do so even after being counseled by his

supervisor. Inasmuch as the customer was one of the employer's

major clients, claimant's conduct was clearly detrimental to the

employer's interest. In view of this, and given claimant's

disrespectful attitude toward his supervisor, we find that

substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant

engaged in disqualifying misconduct. We have considered

claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be

unpersuasive.

Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1385 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1385

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
  allow formula grants to be used to prosecute persons driving while 
                              intoxicated.

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1385

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
  allow formula grants to be used to prosecute persons driving while 
                              intoxicated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION.

    Section 501(b) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 is amended--
            (1) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (21) and 
        adding ``; and''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(22) programs for the prosecution of driving while 
        intoxicated and the enforcement of other laws relating to 
        alcohol use and the operation of motor vehicles.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 1993.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1827

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Eddie Mull lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: August 7, 2023 Filed: August 10, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Eddie Mull appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 8 months in prison and 2 years of supervised release. His counsel

1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the substantive

reasonableness of the sentence. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the revocation sentence. See United States v. McGhee , 869 F.3d 703, 705-06 (8th Cir. 2017) (per curiam). The revocation sentence is within the Guidelines range and accorded a presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal. See United States v. Perkins , 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008). Moreover, there is no indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the appropriate factors. See McGhee , 869 F.3d at 706. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>

                                                           Exhibit 10.20(e)(4)

                            KENDLE INTERNATIONAL INC.
                        1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 4


     This Amendment No. 4 to the Kendle International Inc. 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "Plan"), as adopted by the Board of Directors of Kendle
International Inc. ("Kendle") on March 24, 1998 and by Kendle's shareholders on
May 21, 1998, as amended, is hereby amended further in the following respects:


     1.   Definitions. All capitalized terms herein, unless specifically defined
          in this Amendment No. 4, shall have the meanings given to them in the
          Plan.

     2.   Amendments. The second paragraph of Section 3 is hereby superseded and
          replaced in its entirety by the following new paragraph:

          "This Plan shall remain in effect through the Purchase Period ending
          December 31, 2005 and until such final actions with respect to this
          Purchase Period are completed."

          The third paragraph of Section 3 is hereby superseded and replaced in
          its entirety by the following new paragraph:

          "Commencing July 1, 2005, the "Purchase Period" shall consist of the
          six (6) month period beginning on July 1, 2005 and ending December 31,
          2005."

     3.   Condition. This Amendment No. 4 to the Plan shall become effective
          only upon the approval (by written consent or otherwise) of Kendle's
          Board of Directors or on authorized committee or subcommittee thereof.

     4.   Affirmation. Except as modified above, all other provisions of the
          Plan, as previously amended, shall remain unchanged and in full force
          and effect.


In Witness whereof, this Amendment No. 4 has been executed as of _____________,
2005.



                                                     Kendle International Inc.


                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Douglas W. Campbell
                                                     Secretary



                                       29
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,336,219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,554,199
<PP&E>                                       3,184,832
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,426,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,130,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,006,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,130,180
<SALES>                                      2,507,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,790,169
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,696,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,898
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,898
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.87
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                               3,214
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       40,769
<ALLOWANCES>                           950
<INVENTORY>                         84,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   138,927
<PP&E>                              57,653
<DEPRECIATION>                      21,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     192,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              118,458
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                          2,756
<COMMON>                               125
<OTHER-SE>                          48,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       192,622
<SALES>                            590,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         0
<CGS>                              556,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   (20,241)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   5,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      6,250
<INCOME-TAX>                         3,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  2,572
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         2,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0

        

</TABLE>
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 16, 2007*

#### ALLEN G. GIBBS and ESTHER L. GIBBS VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-07-074)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

Jason C. Workman, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimants and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On February 23, 2007, claimant Esther Gibbs was traveling on Washington Street West in Charleston, Kanawha County, when the vehicle struck a hole in the road, damaging a tire and rim.

2. Respondent was responsible for the maintenance of Washington Street West which it failed to maintain properly on the date of this incident.

3. As a result of this incident, claimants’ vehicle sustained damage in the amount of $252.32.

4. Respondent agrees that the amount of $252.32 for the damages put forth by the claimants is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of Washington Street West on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimants ’ vehicle; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimants may make a recovery for their loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $252.32.

Award of $252.32.