alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.8



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (Midland or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB
for all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management System (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 25, 2016

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106

T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1677 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 

to improve access to grants and loans for evidence-based substance use 

disorder treatment services in rural areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2017 

Mr. DONNELLY (for himself and Mr. STRANGE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade 

Act of 1990 to improve access to grants and loans for 

evidence-based substance use disorder treatment services 

in rural areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISTANCE LEARNING AND TELEMEDICINE. 

4 Section 2333(c) of the Food, Agriculture, Conserva5 tion, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 950aaa–2(c)) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(5) SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENT

8 SERVICES.— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1677 IS

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subpara2 graph (B), the Secretary shall make available 

3 not less than 20 percent of amounts made 

4 available under section 2335A for financial as5 sistance under this chapter for substance use 

6 disorder treatment services. 

7 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—In the case of a fiscal 

8 year for which the Secretary determines that 

9 there are not sufficient qualified applicants to 

10 receive financial assistance for substance use 

11 disorder treatment services to reach the 20-per12 cent requirement under subparagraph (A), the 

13 Secretary may make available less than 20 per14 cent of amounts made available under section 

15 2335A for those services.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 16, 2007*

#### CHAD A. NUZUM VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-06-288)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when his 2006 Toyota Camry struck a broken section of pavement while he was traveling on Pleasant Valley Road near Benton’s Ferry, Marion County. Pleasant Valley Road is a road *30maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to deny this claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred at approximately 8:00 p.m. on August 12,2006. Pleasant Valley Road is a two-lane highway at the area of the incident involved in this claim. Claimant testified that he was driving on Pleasant Valley Road when his vehicle struck a section of berm that had broken off. He stated that he had noticed the berm was in a state of disrepair previously but had not noticed how bad it was. Mr. Nuzum stated that the section that his vehicle struck was approximately eight feet long and over seven inches deep. Claimant’s vehicle struck the broken section of berm sustaining damage to both passenger side tires totaling $248.55.

The position of the respondent is that *it*did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Pleasant Valley Road at the site of the claimant’s accident for the date in question. Respondent did not present any witnesses or evidence at the hearing of this matter.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins*vs. *Sims,*130 W.Va. 645; 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman vs. Dept. of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had at least constructive notice of the broken section of pavement which claimant’s vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. Photographs in evidence depict the broken section of pavement and provide the Court an accurate portrayal of the size and location of the pavement on Pleasant Valley Road. The size of the broken section of road and the time of the year in which claimant’s incident occurred leads the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this hazardous condition and respondent had an adequate amount of time to take corrective action. However, at the hearing of this matter the Court directed the claimant to provide a copy of his insurance declaration page, which he did not submit. Therefore, the Court is of the opinion to and does hereby deny this claim.

Claim disallowed.
## Cover Letter

Dear Sir or Madam, {XXX} is hereby submitting the accompanying Premanufacture Notice (PMN) TS- KNA129 for review. In accordance with 40 CFR Section 700.45(b), the fee of $2,500.00 has been paid via pay.gov. This portion of the PMN contains confidential business information (CBI). The chemical identity information is claimed confidential and will be provided by {XXX} in the forthcoming Letter of Support document (Letter of Support A). Additionally, the use and worker exposure/environmental release information is claimed confidential and will be provided by {XXX} in another Letter of Support document (Letter of Support B). If there are any questions regarding this submission, please contact Saadia Eltayeb at 202-828-8965. Sincerely, {XXX}

Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### 258748MO SUBM121010046825480 KNA129

X X X Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X 

## X Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X
X X X X X XXX XXX XXX Page 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X X Refer to Letter of Support A 

## X See Attachment 002 (Letter of Support A.pdf)
Letter of Support A.pdf Page 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONRefer to Letter of Support A

Refer to Letter of Support A Refer to Letter of Support A Page 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONP4SB0C1 Part I, Section B, 0. If another person will submit chemical ID info for you box

First Name: XXX Last Name: XXX Position: XXX Company: XXX Street Address: XXX City: XXX State: Zip Code: XXX Province: XXX Country: XXX Phone: XXX Email: XXX

Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONSee Letter of Support A Page 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX XXX 

## X Letter of Support B.pdf Refer to Letter of Support B 1 1 0 0 100 0

Page 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## 0

Page 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

Page 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 Letter of Support B Letter of Support B.pdf Pt.I, Sec.C, 1. 1 002 Letter of Support A Letter of Support A.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. 1

Page 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 20 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name Letter of Support B 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.C, 1. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SUBM121010046825480

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name Letter of Support A 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SUBM121010046825480
#### Leopoldo R. Mejia, Appellant-Respondent, v Asa Coleman et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Leonidas Vasquez, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William F. McDermott, J.), which, upon a jury verdict, found defendants Asa Coleman and Sharon Coleman 82% liable, and Leonidas Vasquez 18% liable, and awarded plaintiff judgment *246in the amount of $70,000, plus interest and costs, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and new trial granted with respect to the issue of damages only, unless within 20 days after service upon defendants of copies of the order to be entered herein, together with notice of entry, they serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict in plaintiffs favor to $125,000 plus interest and costs. If defendants so stipulate, the judgment to be entered on that stipulation is hereby affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Trial Term properly declined defendant Coleman’s request to charge PJI 2:85, "Motorist’s Duty Re Maintenance—To Passenger”, and PJI 2:14, "Emergency Situation”, since no evidence was adduced to support these charges. With respect to a motorist’s duty to his passenger, defendant offered no evidence to establish that the accident was caused by a mechanical defect *(see, Gordon v State of New York,*57 Misc 2d 731, 736). Likewise, there was neither a claim nor evidence that Coleman had failed to exercise best judgment as between choice of alternatives, as a predicate to the emergency situation charge *(see, Amaro v City of New York,*40 NY2d 30, 36; *Rowlands v Parks,*2 NY2d 64, 67-68).

We find that the award of damages was inadequate in view of the nature and extent of plaintiffs injuries and consequently we have conditioned the avoidance of a new trial as to damages upon stipulation by both defendants to an increased amount. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Smith, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund V L.P., Series 4 (the “Partnership”) for
the quarters ended December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC &
Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, except to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership financial statements
to refer to the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the Partnership’s annual financial
statements and except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and
June 30, 2010; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Wilfred
    N. Cooper Jr                                  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Wilfred N. Cooper Jr                                          | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates Inc



Date: November 4, 2013
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 May 9, 2007
 /s/ Daryl J. Faulkner

Daryl J. Faulkner 
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Joseph P. Slattery

Joseph P. Slattery
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      |  |                                                                                                                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2009 |  | /s/ JOHN P. BURKE                                                                                                      
|                      |  | John P. Burke                                                                                                          
|                      |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Treasurer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings,
L.P.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1745 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1745

To revise the boundaries of a John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
                System Unit in Topsail, North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2017

 Mr. Tillis (for himself and Mr. Burr) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To revise the boundaries of a John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
                System Unit in Topsail, North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) as are necessary to exclude lots 
from Coastal Barrier Resources System Unit L06 in North Topsail Beach 
that are serviced by infrastructure (as described in section 4(g)(1)(B) 
of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B))) 
installed along North Carolina Highway 210 and New River Inlet Road.
    (b) Map Described.--The map referred to in subsection (a) is a map 
that--
            (1) is included in a set of maps as part of the John H. 
        Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Digital Mapping Pilot 
        Project entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
        System'', dated November 20, 2013; and
            (2) relates to unit L06 of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
        System.
                                 <all>
```
#### BUTLER v. STATE.

No. 20650.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1939.

*272T. B. Sisco, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of 21 days and by a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
H. Con. Res. 39 Agreed to March 17, 2009

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR DC 

SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

On June 5, 2009, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 

Administration of the Senate may jointly designate, the 2009 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run 

(in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through 

the Capitol Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer games. 

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 

necessary to carry out the event. 

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS. 

The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical preparations for the event. 

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 

restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 

Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations 

on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable 

to the Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sean B. OConnor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 5, 2009



/s/ Sean B. OConnorSean B. OConnorChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10(q)(2)



AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO

MARKETING AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO THE MARKETING AGREEMENT, effective as indicated herein, by and between OM Financial Life Insurance Company, (formerly known as Americom Life & Annuity Insurance Company) (OMFLIC), a Maryland corporation, and Legacy Marketing Group (LMG), a California corporation.



WHEREAS, OMFLIC and LMG entered into a Marketing Agreement (Agreement), wherein LMG agreed to provide specified services relating to the marketing of certain insurance policies issued by OMFLIC;



WHEREAS, OMFLIC and LMG desire to amend to the Agreement.



NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and mutual promises hereinafter contained and other good and valuable consideration, LMG and OMFLIC mutually agree to the following:



1.

OMFLIC agrees that LMG receives asset-based trail commissions on the policies marketed by LMG, pursuant to either its marketing and administrative agreements between the parties. Effective November 15, 2007, LMG hereby assigns, with OMFLICs consent, all OMFLIC asset-based trail commissions to Legacy TM, LP.  LMG agrees that OMFLICs payment of such asset-based trail commissions to Legacy TM, LP satisfies OMFLICs obligations to LMG with respect to such asset-based trail commissions.  OMFLIC shall pay such asset-based trail commissions to Legacy TM, LP as long as each such policy generating such asset-based trail commissions remains in force.





All other provisions in the Agreement not specifically amended above remain in effect and unchanged.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment.





Legacy Marketing Group

OM Financial Life Insurance Company



By : /s/ R. Preston Pitts

By: /s/ Bruce Parker



Printed Name: R. Preston Pitts

Printed Name: Bruce Parker



Title: President

Title: Chief Executive Officer



Date: January 17, 2008

Date: January 17, 2008





1