alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 19, 2017

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | First Mining Finance Corp. (the
      Company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                      
|    | Consent of Expert                               
|    |                                                 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by
reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2016.

I, Michael P. Cullen, M.Sc., P.Geo., of Mercator Geological
Services Limited, hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with
reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical
report:

2015 Mineral Resource Estimate
Technical Report for the Hope Brook Gold Project, Newfoundland and Labrador,
Canada (the Technical Report).

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ Michael P.
      Cullen, M.Sc., P.Geo.Michael P. Cullen, M.Sc., P.Geo.Mercator Geological Services Limited
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Commission on Libraries and Information Science

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        To request further information or to make special arrangements for persons with disabilities, contact Judith C. Russell by telephone at 202-606-9200, by fax at 202-606-9203 or by e-mail to                         *jrussell@nclis.gov*, no later than Wednesday, November 29, 2000.                     

Dated: November 20, 2000. 

Robert S. Willard, 

NCLIS Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-30063 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7527-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,299
<SECURITIES>                                    43,344
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,697
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,927
<PP&E>                                          14,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,255
<SALES>                                         19,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,447
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                       492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,482
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
# Site Assessment & Non

-NPL Federal Facilities Branch

An Overview Alizabeth OlhassoSite Discovery

Preliminary Assessment (PA) Site Inspection (SI) HRS Package 

## The Site

Assessment Process HRS Package Proposal to NPL Public Comment Site Placed on NPL 

## Process

# Hazard Ranking System (HRS)  

### The HRS is used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or potential releases of hazardous substances.  

### The HRS is the primary screening tool for determining whether a site is to be included on the NPL. A score of 28.5 makes a site eligible for the NPL.

# Basis of HRS Score

- Pathways  Ground water migration  Surface water migration (composed of the three threats — drinking water, human food chain, and environmental)  Soil exposure (composed of two threats — resident population and nearby population)  Air migration.

# Scoring for each Pathway Each pathway is assessed for the following:  Likelihood of release (or, for the soil exposure pathway, likelihood of exposure)  Waste characteristics  Targets

# Region 3 Site Assessment Statistics  167 Sites on the NPL in Region 3  95 in PA  31 in VA  9 in WV 18 in MD   14 in DE  6,000 Sites in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) in Region 3 ALONE  1,700 of those are active sites!

# Non

-NPL Federal Facilities A Federal facility can fall into one or more of the following categories:  CERCLA site  Federal Docket site  Formerly used defense site (FUD site)  Military munitions response program (MMRP)

# Federal Facilities Docket  

### Sites are listed if they have had a reporting requirement under RCRA sections 3005, 3010, 3016 or CERCLA section 103.  

### Region 3 has 273 sites on the Docket.  

### Listed sites must submit a PA for EPA review to determine NPL eligibility.

# FUD Sites  Sites are potentially contaminated with hazardous substances as well as ordnance and explosives and related wastes.  Approximately 560 sites in Region 3. Nationally there are around 9,000 sites.  Clean-up estimated at $15-20 B.  May take over 70 years to complete.  DoD is responsible for addressing FUDs under the Defense and Environmental Restoration Program Act (DERP).  This responsibility is delegated to the Army Corp of Engineers (USACE).

# MMRP Sites  MMRP sites are DoD sites that contain munitions and explosives of concern and/or munitions constituents.  Over 3,500 sites on more than 15 million acres are on the MMRP inventory nationwide. Region 3 had 282 MMRP sites in 2006.  Region 3’s highest profile MMRP sites currently are Spring Valley and Plum Tree Island.

## SiteAssessment & Non

-NPL Federal Facilities

Questions?
#### SOVEREIGN CAMP, WOODMEN OF THE WORLD, v. Jesusa R. DE MARTINEZ.

No. 2224—7297.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

March 22, 1939.

Keys & Holt and Jesse M. Davis, all of Corpus Christi, for. plaintiff in error.

L. D. Stroud and Wade & Wade, all of Beeville, for defendant in error.

HARVEY, Commissioner.

The principal question presented in the application for the writ of error in this case goes to the validity of Subdivision 10 of Section 57 of the by-laws of Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World, being *the same*by-law provision which we have this day held to be void in the case of Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Martinez et ux., Tex.Com.App., 126 S.W.2d 10, this day decided.

Other questions presented in the application go to the ruling of the Court of Civil Appeals on the other evidentiary matters discussed in the opinion of that court. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. De Martinez, 103 S.W.2d 995. We have carefully considered the questions raised, and conclude that the several rulings of that court are correct.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, affirming the judgment of the trial court, is affirmed.

Opinion "adopted by the Supreme Court

CURETON, C. J., not sitting. ■
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30021]



[[Page 70629]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Public Notice #3468]


U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy; Notice of Meeting

    The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, reauthorized 
pursuant to Public Law 106-113 (H.R. 3194, Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2000), will meet on Tuesday, December 12, 2000 in Room 600, 301 
4th St., SW, Washington, DC, from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon.
    The Commission will discuss follow-up to its report, the Smith-
Mundt Act, plans for a trip to the Far East, and U.S. government 
exchanges.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting, though 
attendance of public members will be limited to the seating available. 
Access to the building is controlled, and individual building passes 
are required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should 
contact David J. Kramer, Executive Director, at (202) 619-4463.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
David J. Kramer,
Executive Director, U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.
[FR Doc. 00-30021 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-U
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1478

For the relief of Chi Hsii Tsui, Jin Mie Tsui, Yin Whee Tsui, Yin Tao

Tsui, and Yin Chao Tsui.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Chi Hsii Tsui, Jin Mie Tsui, Yin Whee

Tsui, Yin Tao Tsui, and Yin Chao Tsui.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CHI HSII

4 TSUI, JIN MIE TSUI, YIN WHEE TSUI, YIN TAO

5 TSUI, AND YIN CHAO TSUI.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 201(a)

7 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Chi Hsii Tsui,

8 Jin Mie Tsui, Yin Whee Tsui, Yin Tao Tsui, and Yin Chao

9 Tsui shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa

10 or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully
2

•HR 1478 IH

1 admitted for permanent residence upon filing an applica2 tion for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204

3 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful perma4 nent resident.

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Chi Hsii Tsui, Jin

6 Mie Tsui, Yin Whee Tsui, Yin Tao Tsui, or Yin Chao Tsui

7 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci8 fied in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have

9 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi10 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of

12 the enactment of this Act.

13 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

14 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap15 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica16 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

17 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

18 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

19 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res20 idence to Chi Hsii Tsui, Jin Mie Tsui, Yin Whee Tsui,

21 Yin Tao Tsui, and Yin Chao Tsui, the Secretary of State

22 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 5, during the

23 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of

24 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

25 country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the
3

•HR 1478 IH

1 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

2 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

3 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

4 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1





Exhibit
10.1

Amended 2005 compensation information for
Michael H. Madison, David M. Eppler and Dilek Samil:


  	
      
       
	
       
	
      
        
        2005-2007 LTIP
  Cycle (1)

      

	
      
      

  Name and Principal

      Position
	
      

  2005 Base 

      Salary
	
      

  2005 AIP 

      Target
	
      
      Number of 

      Threshold 

      Shares
	
      
      Number of 

      Target 

      Shares
	
      
      Number of 

      Maximum 

      Shares

	
      
      Michael H. Madison - President and Chief Executive
  Officer

 
	
      $359,808 (2)
	
      65%
	
      2,477

      	
      8,255

      	
      16,510

      
	
      David M. Eppler -
  Former President and Chief Executive Officer
	
      $228,846 (3)
	
      65%
	
      4,784

      	
      15,946

      	
      31,892

      
	
      Dilek Samil - President and Chief Operating Officer
  (Cleco Power LLC)
	
      
      $280,385 (4)
	
      
      50%
	
      2,019
	
      6,729
	
      13,458

							




_______________________

1  Additional grants of 4,450 and 825 shares of
time-based restricted stock were made to Mr. Madison and Ms. Samil,
respectively, in connection with their appointments to their new positions.

2  Estimated total base salary for 2005.  Mr. Madison's annualized
base salary prior to January 29, 2005 was $285,000; from January 29 through May
4, 2005 was $300,000; and from and after May 5, 2005 is $400,000.

3  Base Salary paid until Mr. Eppler's retirement
effective July 1, 2005.  Mr. Eppler's annualized base salary for 2005 was
$425,000.

4  Estimated
total base salary for 2005.  Ms. Samil's annualized base salary prior to January
29, 2005 was $245,000; from January 29 through May 4, 2005 was $269,000; and from
and after May 5, 2005 is $292,000.

Upon his retirement Mr. Eppler will
also receive a $50,000 lump sump payment for his significant contributions to Cleco. 
Mr. Eppler will also receive a pro rata payout of target and opportunity shares
of LTIP performance cycles ending December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, which will
result in the award of 3,773 additional shares over those currently awarded to
him under these performance cycles.  Mr. Eppler's gross SERP benefit will be
approximately $26,000 per month and will be reduced by any pension benefits
payable.  The LTIP payout and the SERP monthly benefit are calculated as of July
1, 2005.
#### FRUGE v. VITOPIL.

No. 2275.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Jan. 23, 1941.

Lewis & Ingram, of Houston, for appellant.

J. G. Minkert, of Bryan, for appellee.

RICE, Chief Justice.

Appellant appeals from an order of the district court of Brazos county overruling his plea of privilege to be sued in Plarris county, where he resided.

Upon the hearing by the court of the issue of venue appellee offered no evidence; and agreed in open court that the residence of appellant at the time of the filing of this cause and at the time of the presentation of the plea of privilege was Houston, Harris county, Texas.

Appellant assigns error to the action of the court in overruling his plea of privilege, in that no proof was made by appellee of the facts set out in her controverting affidavit, and she failed to discharge the burden of proof cast upon her by law.

**We sustain this assignment. The burden rested upon appellee to establish by a preponderance of the evidence introduced on the hearing the facts upon which she relied to sustain venue in Brazos county. She offered no evidence. 43 Tex.Jur. 851, sec. 112; Curlee Clothing Co. v. Wickliffe, 126 Tex. 573, 91 S.W.2d 677.

Because it is apparent that this case was not developed in the trial court, it is our opinion that it should be remanded for a further hearing. Lanford v. Smith, Chief Justice, 128 Tex. 373, 99 S.W.2d 593.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Power of Attorney



 Exhibit 10.32 
  
 Power of Attorney 
  
 I, Bing Yu, a Chinese citizen with Chinese Identification Card No. 110108650831235, holding 25% of the equity interest in Lenovo Security Technologies
(Beijing), Inc. (“Lenovo Security”) (“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize Lenovo-AsiaInfo Technologies, Inc. (“Lenovo-AsiaInfo”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term
of this Power of Attorney: 
  
 Lenovo-AsiaInfo is hereby
authorized to act on my behalf as my exclusive agent with respect to all matters concerning My Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholders’ meetings of Lenovo Security ; 2) at shareholders’ meetings of Lenovo
Security, exercise all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China and Lenovo Security’s Articles of Association, including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or
disposition of My Shareholding in part or in whole; and 3) designate and appoint on my behalf at the shareholders’ meetings of Lenovo Security, the legal representative (chairperson), the director, supervisor, the chief executive officer and
other senior management members of Lenovo Security. 
  
 All the
actions associated with My Shareholding conducted by Lenovo-AsiaInfo shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the documents related to My Shareholding executed by Lenovo-AsiaInfo shall be deemed to be executed by myself. 
  
 Lenovo-AsiaInfo is entitled to assign its rights related to the aforesaid
matters to any other person in its own discretion and without my prior notice or consent. 
  
 This Power of Attorney is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid during the term I am the shareholder of Lenovo Security from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney.

  
 During the term of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all
the rights associated with My Shareholding, which have been authorized to Lenovo-AsiaInfo through this Power of Attorney, and shall not exercise such rights by myself. 
  
 This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the
English version, the Chinese version shall prevail. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Bing
Yu                    

	 Name:
	 	 Bing Yu

	 Date:   December 2, 2004



  
 Witness : /s/ Yan
Huang                                 
 Name :      Yan Huang 
 Date
:        December 2, 2004 
  

 1
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 National Energy Group, Inc.
Computation of Historical Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges
(in thousands, except for ratios) Year ended December 31,2000
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004EarningsIncome before income taxes and
extraordinary items
    
    $
    18,609
    
    
    $
    6,722
    
    
    $
    14,483
    
    
    $
    15,796
    
    
    $
    20,949Interest expense
    
    
    9,656
    
    
    
    21,224
    
    
    
    18,964
    
    
    
    15,115
    
    
    
    13,940Amortization of debt issuance cost
    
    
    121
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135Earnings
    
    $
    28,521
    
    
    $
    28,081
    
    
    $
    33,582
    
    
    $
    31,046
    
    
    $
    35,024Fixed charges:Interest, including capitalized portion
    
    $
    9,656
    
    
    $
    21,224
    
    
    $
    18,964
    
    
    $
    15,115
    
    
    $
    13,940Amortization of debt issuance cost
    
    
    121
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135Fixed charges
    
    $
    9,912
    
    
    $
    21,359
    
    
    $
    19,099
    
    
    $
    15,250
    
    
    $
    14,075Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    NA
    (a)
    
    
    1.3X
    
    
    
    1.8X
    
    
    
    2.0X
    
    
    
    2.5X
 (a) This ratio excludes approximately $10.5 million for 2000 of interest on the senior
notes since the Company discontinued the accrual of interest due to the Chapter 11 proceeding.