alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1732 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1732

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to promote testing of 
incentive payments for behavioral health providers for adoption and use 
           of certified electronic health record technology.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Access to Behavioral 
Health Information Technology Act''.

SEC. 2. TESTING OF INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PROVIDERS 
              FOR ADOPTION AND USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH 
              RECORD TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 1115A(b)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1315a(b)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
                            ``(xxv) Providing incentive payments to 
                        behavioral health providers for the adoption 
                        and use of certified electronic health record 
                        technology (as defined in section 1848(o)(4)) 
                        to improve the quality and coordination of care 
                        through the electronic documentation and 
                        exchange of health information. Behavioral 
                        health providers may include--
                                    ``(I) psychiatric hospitals (as 
                                defined in section 1861(f));
                                    ``(II) community mental health 
                                centers (as defined in section 
                                1861(ff)(3)(B));
                                    ``(III) clinical psychologists (as 
                                defined in section 1861(ii));
                                    ``(IV) clinical social workers (as 
                                defined in section 1861(hh)(1)); and
                                    ``(V) hospitals, treatment 
                                facilities, and mental health or 
                                substance use disorder providers that 
                                participate in a State plan under title 
                                XIX or a waiver of such plan.''.

            Passed the Senate May 7, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1732

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to promote testing of 
incentive payments for behavioral health providers for adoption and use 
           of certified electronic health record technology.
```
| (logo) plante             moran | **Plante****& Moran, PLLC**10 South Riverside Plaza9th FloorChicago, IL 60606Tel: 312.207.1040Fax: 312.207.1066 plantemoran.com |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  To the Board of DirectorsNational Tax Search, LLC We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the "Company") compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth-in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31 , 2015. The Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria, 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.  /s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC Chicago, ILJanuary 18, 2016 (logo) Praxity MEMBERGLOBAL ALLIANCE OFINDEPENDENT FIRMS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6763
ANTHONY TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-95-967-N) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Angelone , No. CA-95-967-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We also deny Appellant's motion for bail pending appeal and his motion for a certificate of probable cause. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Andy Teng, Chief Executive Officer of Northgate Innovations, Inc., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Northgate Innovations, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: September 17, 2003

                        /s/ Andy Teng
                        -------------------------------------
                        Andy Teng
                        Chief Executive Officer and Acting CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1567 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1567

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt 
interest shall not be taken into account in determining the portion of 
          social security benefits subject to income taxation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 1993

  Mr. Flake introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt 
interest shall not be taken into account in determining the portion of 
          social security benefits subject to income taxation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) paragraph (2) 
of section 86(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 
modified adjusted gross income) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Modified adjusted gross income.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `modified adjusted gross income' means 
        adjusted gross income determined without regard to this section 
        and sections 135, 911, 931, and 933.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to taxable 
years beginning after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Wednesday, April 9, 2014 Meeting April 9, 2014
Office of Justice Programs
Third floor Main Conference Room
810 7th Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
Time: 11:00 AM to 12:30 PM

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance

April 9, 2014 Meeting Materials

**Presenters Bios**

Catherine E. Lhamon
	Marlyn Tillman
	Russ Skiba
	James Bell
	Chief Judge Chandlee Kuhn**Materials**

Civil Rights Data Collection: School Discipline Data Snapshot
	Parent Leadership Institute Brochure
	Gwinnett SToPP About Us
	Gwinnett SToPP Educational Series
	Gwinnett SToPP Complaint Summary
	What is the Dignity in Schools CampaignPowerPoint: Discipline Disparities
	Disparity Interventions
	Disparity New Research
	Discipline Disparities Series: Key FindingsNational Council of Juvenile Justice and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) Document
	Zero Tolerance SchoolSupportive School Discipline Initiative BriefHealth and Human Services (HHS) Announcement
	Housing and Urban Development (HUD) AnnouncementPowerPoint: Delaware's Gun Court
	PowerPoint: Fightin' and Fussin' - An Examination of School Arrests, Adjudications, and Dispositions in Delaware**Discipline Disparities Reports**

Discipline Disparities Series: Overview
	Eliminating Excessive and Unfair Exclusionary Discipline in Schools
	How Educators Can Eradicate Disparities in School Discipline: A Briefing Paper on School-Based Interventions
	New and Developing Research on Disparities in Discipline
  
Date Published: April 9, 2014
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1363 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1363

  To rescind a portion of the funds available for HOPE grants, and to 
  transfer an additional portion of the funds to the HOME investment 
                         partnerships program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1993

  Mr. Orton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To rescind a portion of the funds available for HOPE grants, and to 
  transfer an additional portion of the funds to the HOME investment 
                         partnerships program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

              DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

                            Housing Programs

   homeownership and opportunity for people everywhere grants (hope 
                                grants)

                   (rescission and transfer of funds)

    Of the funds made available under this heading (other than the 
$300,000,000 provided for grants to carry out an urban revitalization 
demonstration program) in the Departments of Veterans Affairs and 
Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations 
Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1579), $275,000,000 is rescinded 
and $50,000,000 shall be transferred to and merged with the 
appropriation in such Act for ``HOME investment partnerships program''.
    Of the funds made available under this heading in the Departments 
of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 1992 (Pub. L. 102-139; 105 Stat. 743), 
$125,000,000 is rescinded and $25,000,000 shall be transferred to and 
merged with the appropriation in such Act for ``HOME investment 
partnerships program''.

                                 <all>
```
# Úřední věstník C 42A/9. ú

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 42A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 609. února 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 42A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 609. února 2017

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| | Eurojust |
| 2017/C 42 A/01 | Oznámení o volné pozici administrativního ředitele Eurojustu (stupeň AD 14) – Haag, Nizozemsko – 17/EJ/01 | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Eurojust

2017/C 42 A/01

Oznámení o volné pozici administrativního ředitele Eurojustu (stupeň AD 14) – Haag, Nizozemsko – 17/EJ/01

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Eurojust

| 9.2.2017 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2017

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 42/1

---

Oznámení o volné pozici administrativního ředitele Eurojustu (stupeň AD 14) – Haag, Nizozemsko – 17/EJ/01

(2017/C 042 A/01)

Eurojust vyhlašuje výběrové řízení pro obsazení pozice administrativního ředitele. Eurojust byl zřízen v roce 2002 za účelem zefektivnění spolupráce příslušných orgánů členských států při potírání závažné organizované a mezinárodní trestné činnosti. V Eurojustu působí státní zástupci, soudci a policisté, kteří vytvářejí kolegium Eurojustu, prostřednictvím kterého jsou odpovědni za jeho organizaci a operační činnost. Administrativní ředitel vykonává svou činnost pod dohledem prezidenta kolegia, je odpovědný za každodenní správu Eurojustu a za jeho personální řízení. Bližší informace o volné pozici a postupu pro podání přihlášky do výběrového řízení naleznete na webových stránkách:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

Uzávěrka pro podání přihlášky je o půlnoci středoevropského času 17. března 2017.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Worley Hall, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James J. Leif, J.), rendered January 5, 1989, convicting defendant, after trial by jury, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to 4 Vi to 9 years’ imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was arrested during a buy-and-bust operation after selling crack cocaine to an undercover police officer for $20 of prerecorded buy money. Within minutes, the officer transmitted defendant’s description, including the fact that he was wearing a distinctive tee shirt, to backup officers who promptly arrested him still in possession of the buy money and wearing the tee shirt. The undercover officer viewed defendant under arrest minutes thereafter and confirmed that he was the seller.

Defendant contends that the court erred in failing to charge the jury on identification and alibi. These claims have not *284been preserved as a matter of law, and we decline to reach them. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.
Docket No: FAA

- 2015
- 3634 Dir ID: 2014
- NM
- 203
- AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response Transport Canada Durrani , A. K.

613
- 952
- 4357 10/15/1 4
. No Objection Bombardier Aerospace Jason Hochstein

514
- 855
- 5000 X 59594 10/15/14 Called and left voicemail , No objection
Regional Airline Association Stacey Bechdolt

bechdolt@raa.org 10/15/14 Emailed. No object ion , No Objection
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1484 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1484

 Making appropriations for the House of Representative's Official Mail 
   Cost for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994 and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1993

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Making appropriations for the House of Representative's Official Mail 
   Cost for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994 and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums 
are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, namely,

                          official mail costs

    For expenses necessary for official mail costs of the House of 
Representatives, $11,927,750, as authorized by law.

                                 <all>
```
appealable. See NRAP 3A(b); Taylor Constr. Co., 100 Nev. at 209, 678 

P.2d at 1153. Appellant seemingly seeks to challenge various post-divorce 

decree rulings and orders in Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. D-12- 

468773-D that modified her child custody and visitation rights. While an 

order that finally establishes child custody is appealable, NRAP 3A(b)(7), 

a temporary child custody or visitation order is not. See In re Temp. 

Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 443, 777 P.2d 901, 902 

(1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a temporary custody 

order subject to periodic review). Our review of the documents before us 

reveals that, in the case below, the district court has not yet entered a 

final order resolving the parties' various motions to modify child custody 

and visitation, and a hearing for that purpose is scheduled to occur on 

October 28, 2014. As a result, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal pending 

in Docket No. 66063, and we therefore order that appeal dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED.' 

SS\ 

Hardesty 

, J. 

—4?-4 Douglas 1VAJ. 

'Although we dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 65702, we defer 

ruling on appellant's August 5, 2014, request that the filing fee she paid 

on August 4, 2014, be returned. We deny as moot all requests for relief in 

Docket No. 66063. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e 
cc: Hon. Cynthia Dianne Steel, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Lavonne Kolender 

Dale E. Haley 

Louis C. Schneider, LLC 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

KO) I947A