alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS Page | 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBERT HUGGANS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION

vs. §

§ No. 3:22-cv-02416-B

NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY §

SERVICES, LLC §

§

Defendants. §

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Robert Huggans (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant National

Bankruptcy Services, LLC (“Defendant”) and hereby files this Joint Motion to Dismiss. In

support to their Motion, the parties show the Court as follows:

The Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that this action be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of action, and

parties, with each party bearing that party’s own attorney’s fees and costs.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Robert Huggans and Defendant National Bankruptcy Services,

LLC respectfully request this case be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of action,

and parties, with each party bearing that party’s own attorney’s fees and costs.

Case 3:22-cv-02416-BN Document 41 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 196
JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS Page | 2

Dated: September 25, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Donald E. Uloth

Donald E. Uloth

State Bar No. 20374200

Law Office of Donald E. Uloth

18208 Preston Rd. Suite D-9 # 261

Dallas, Texas 75252

Phone: (214) 989-4396

Email: don.uloth@uloth.pro

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

MEADERS & ALFARO

MICHELLE MISHOE MILLER

State Bar No. 24044991

SONIA B. ALFARO

State Bar No. 24086849

Two Riverway, Suite 845

Houston, TX 77056

Telephone: (713) 403-3122

Facsimile: (855) 602-8224

Email: michelle.miller@meaderslaw.com

Email: salfaro@meaderslaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 25th day of September 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing

document with the Clerk of the Court for the FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing all Counsel of record.

/s/ Michelle Mishoe Miller

MICHELLE MISHOE MILLER

Case 3:22-cv-02416-BN Document 41 Filed 09/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 197
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLAN TA,____________________ The C ourt of App eals hereby passes the following order: A15A0109. WPG INTE RIORS & EXTERI ORS, INC. v. MCBRIDE, LLC et al. McB ride, LLC and CornellMcBride fi led su it against WPG Interiors & Exteriors, Inc. (“WPG”) in magistrate court. The magistrate courtfound in favor of the plaintiff, and W PG ap pealed to state court. At the state court , W P G asserted counterclaims, and the plaintiffs a dded a request for OCGA § 13-6-11 attorneyfees. On March 15, 2013, the stat e court ente r ed a fi nal or der awar ding attorne y fees and dismis sing WPG’s counterclaims with pre judic e. WPG appeals t

his r uling. Because the or der t o be appeal ed d ispose s of a de nov o ap pea l f

ro m a ma gis trat e court decis ion, WPG was required to fol low discreti onary appeal procedures. See OC GA § 5- 6-3 5 (a) ( 11) ; Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage C orp. East , 216 Ga. App. 82 ( 453 SE2d 119 ) (19 95) . Eve n if the state court deci ded an issue that was not r aised in the ma gistra te cou rt, any app eal to th is co urt m ust co mp ly w ith discretionary app ea l p ro ce dur es bec aus e the c as e i nvo lv es a de nov o ap pea l f ro m a mag istrate cou rt de cisio n. Bulloc k v. Sand , 260 Ga. App. 874, 876 ( 581 SE2d 333 ) (2003); Handler v. Hulsey , 19 9 G a. A pp . 75 1, 752 (40 6 SE2 d 225) (19 91). Acc or di ngly, we l ac k j ur is di ct io n ov er th is ap pe al , whi chis he re by D IS MISS ED. Court of Appeal

s of the Stat

e of Georgia Clerk’sOffice, Atlanta,______

______________ I certify that

the above is a true extract fro m the minutes of

the Court of

Appeals of Geor

gia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed

the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

### 09/18/2014 September 18, 2014
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, William C. Stone, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Not applicable;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: November 2, 2007 /s/ William C. Stone     William C. StoneChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors(Principal Executive Officer)
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1287 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into 

a partnership with the Porter County Convention, Recreation and Visitor Commission regarding the use of the 

Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center as a visitor center for the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and for 

other purposes. 
2 

•HR 1287 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DOROTHY BUELL MEMORIAL VISITOR CENTER. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center Partnership 

6 Act’’. 

7 (b) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.—The Sec8 retary of the Interior may enter into a memorandum of 

9 understanding to establish a joint partnership with the 

10 Porter County Convention, Recreation and Visitor Com11 mission. The memorandum of understanding shall— 

12 (1) identify the overall goals and purpose of the 

13 Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center; 

14 (2) establish how management and operational 

15 duties will be shared; 

16 (3) determine how exhibits, signs, and other in17 formation are developed; 

18 (4) indicate how various activities will be fund19 ed; 

20 (5) identify who is responsible for providing site 

21 amenities; 

22 (6) establish procedures for changing or dis23 solving the joint partnership; and 
3 

•HR 1287 EH

1 (7) address any other issues deemed necessary 

2 by the Secretary or the Porter County Convention, 

3 Recreation and Visitor Commission. 

4 (c) DEVELOPMENT OF EXHIBITS.—The Secretary 

5 may plan, design, construct, and install exhibits in the 

6 Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center related to the use 

7 and management of the resources at Indiana Dunes Na8 tional Lakeshore, at a cost not to exceed $1,500,000. 

9 (d) NATIONAL LAKESHORE PRESENCE.—The Sec10 retary may use park staff from Indiana Dunes National 

11 Lakeshore in the Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center 

12 to provide visitor information and education. 

13 SEC. 2. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE. 

14 Section 19 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for 

15 the establishment of the Indiana Dunes National Lake16 shore, and for other purposes’’ (16 U.S.C. 460u–19) is 

17 amended— 

18 (1) by striking ‘‘After notifying’’ and inserting 

19 ‘‘(a) After notifying’’; and 

20 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(b) CONTIGUOUS CLARIFIED.—For purposes of sub22 section (a), lands may be considered contiguous to other 

23 lands if the lands touch the other lands, or are separated 
4 

•HR 1287 EH

1 from the other lands by only a public or private right2 of-way, such as a road, railroad, or utility corridor.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1287 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter 

poses. Dunes National Lakeshore, and for other purVisitor Center as a visitor center for the Indiana garding the use of the Dorothy Buell Memorial vention, Recreation and Visitor Commission reinto a partnership with the Porter County Con-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7066

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ZAFAR AZIZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR92-341-S)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zafar Aziz, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Zafar Aziz appeals from the district court’s orders denying

his motions for a reduction in his sentence and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Aziz, No. CR-92-

341-S (D. Md. June 10, 1998; June 23, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









We have issued our reports dated March 30, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Numerex Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Numerex Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-114842, effective November 23, 2004; File No. 333-122681, effective August 28, 2005; File No. 333-136093, effective August 8, 2006; and File No. 333-140483, effective June 7, 2007) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-51780, effective December 13, 2000; File No. 333-105142, effective May 9, 2003; and File No. 333-143805, effective June 15, 2007).






/s/ Grant Thornton LLP






Atlanta, Georgia




March 30, 2011
# Europeiska unionens C 39A/7 fe

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 39A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 60 årgången7 februari 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 39A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

60 årgången7 februari 2017

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Europeiska kommissionen |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | Gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet — Inbjudan att lämna in intresseanmälan för posten som ordförande i överklagandenämnden vid växtsortsmyndigheten (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska kommissionen

2017/C 39 A/01

Gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet — Inbjudan att lämna in intresseanmälan för posten som ordförande i överklagandenämnden vid växtsortsmyndigheten (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska kommissionen

| 7.2.2017 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 39/1

---

GEMENSKAPENS VÄXTSORTSMYNDIGHET

Inbjudan att lämna in intresseanmälan för posten som ordförande i överklagandenämnden vid växtsortsmyndigheten

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

Gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet ska utse en ordförande i sin överklagandenämnd.

Sökande ska vara medborgare i en av Europeiska unionens medlemsstater.

Ordföranden ska utses av rådet på grundval av en förteckning över kandidater som kommissionen ska lägga fram efter att myndighetens förvaltningsråd lämnat ett yttrande. Information om ersättning erhålls på begäran från överklagandenämndens sekretariat (Community Plant Variety Office, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, 49101 Angers Cedex 02, Frankrike). Gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet och kommissionen tillämpar en policy för lika möjligheter.

Fullständig inbjudan att lämna in intresseanmälan och länk till webbansökan finns på: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

Ansökan ska ha inkommit senast den 8 mars 2017 (se närmare om detta i ansökningsinstruktionerna).

---
HEALTHCARE
ACQUISITION CORP.

 




April 28,
2005

 




The Lan
Group

3489
Elmwood Avenue

Rochester,
New York 14610







Gentlemen:




This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
“Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial public offering
("IPO") of the securities of Healthcare Acquisition Corp. ("HAC") and continuing
until the earlier of the consummation by HAC of a "Business Combination" or
HAC's liquidation (as described in HAC's IPO prospectus; such date the
"Termination Date"),The Lan Group shall make available to HAC certain office and
secretarial services as may be required by HAC from time to time, situated at
3489 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, New York 14610. In exchange therefore, HAC shall
pay The Lan Group the sum of $1,500 per month on the Effective Date and
continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	HEALTHCARE ACQUISITION
      CORP.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
		By:  	/s/ Matthew P.
    Kinley
	 	
      

      Name: Matthew P. Kinley
	 	Title:
President



 

AGREED TO
AND ACCEPTED BY:

 


	 	 	 
	 	THE LAN
  GROUP
	 
 	 
 	 
 
		By:  	/s/ Derace L. Schaffer,
      M.D.
	 	
      

      Name: Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.
	 	Title:
#### In the Matter of Joseph Zelik, Doing Business as Joseph Real Estate, Petitioner, v Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent.

Determination of respondent dated December 22, 1987, which, after hearing, suspended petitioner’s real estate broker’s license for a period of three months, and indefinitely thereafter until petitioner submits proof of restitution in the amount of $1,400 plus interest to Jose and Victoria Louzao, and which further revoked petitioner’s commission as a notary public, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding (transferred to this court by order of Sup Ct, NY County [Herman Cahn, J.], entered Mar. 24, 1988) is dismissed, without costs.

Upon review of the record, we find substantial evidence to support respondent’s determination that petitioner demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency (Real Property Law § 441-c) in charging a concealed fee in connection with his clients’ financing of the purchase of a new home. Petitioner misled his clients by concealing the fact that he was acting as a mortgage broker, charging a 2% commission on the amount of the mortgage loan. The clients believed they were applying for a low-interest loan from Greenpoint Savings Bank, when in fact petitioner processed their application through Citibank, where he had a brokerage relationship. When the clients found out about the switch in banks, they demanded that petitioner procure their mortgage through Greenpoint, which he did, although he refused to return the two-point commission they had given him, supposedly on the bank’s behalf. These acts of deception and concealment constituted misconduct, untrustworthiness and incompetency, warranting the sanctions imposed. Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
Original 1869 Architectural Drawing – Stairs Detail

Completed Restoration of the N
Completed Restoration of the Southw







Diplomatic Reception Room During 
Diplomatic Reception Room After 





Treasury Collection: Antique Se
Treasury Collection: 


Archival Negative: President Ford at a Treasury Awards Presentation
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1261

To prohibit any type of class III gaming on Indian lands within a State

except for the type of class III gaming specifically allowed by that State.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1993

Mr. MACHTLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To prohibit any type of class III gaming on Indian lands

within a State except for the type of class III gaming

specifically allowed by that State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CLASS III GAMING.

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section

6 11(d) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25

7 U.S.C. 2710(d)) is amended in the matter preceding

8 subparagraph (A) by striking out ‘‘Class III gaming

9 activities shall be lawful on Indian lands only if such

10 activities are—’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘All
2

•HR 1261 IH

1 types of class III gaming activity on Indian lands is

2 prohibited unless a particular type of class III gam3 ing activity is—’’.

4 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

5 11(d)(1)(B) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act

6 (25 U.S.C. 2710(d)) is amended by striking out

7 ‘‘such gaming’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘such

8 type of gaming activity’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

10 (1) RETROACTIVITY.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply at the end of the 180-day

12 period beginning on the date of enactment of this

13 Act to any class III gaming activity occurring on In14 dian lands on or before the date of enactment of this

15 Act.

16 (2) TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT NEGOTIATIONS.—

17 A Tribal-State compact under section 11(d)(3) of

18 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act not in effect on

19 or before the date of enactment of this Act shall be

20 subject to the amendment made by subsection (a).

21 (3) DEFINITION.—For the purposes of this Act,

22 the term ‘‘class III gaming’’ has the same meaning

23 given such term by section 4 of the Indian Gaming

24 Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703).

Æ
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Applied NeuroSolutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      David Ellison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
      David Ellison


David
      Ellison, Chief Financial Officer


April
      24,
      2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w1



 










Exhibit 10.1




Description of William J. Nydam Salary Adjustment, Effective February 2005



Effective as of February 23, 2005, William J. Nydam’s annual base salary was increased from
$254,400 to $262,032, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, which provides for the
review and adjustment of Mr. Nydam’s base salary in accordance with our procedures for adjusting
salaries for senior executives.