### T ERRENCE 

### A

. 

### G AISER

Attorney at Law

2900 Smith Street, Suite 220

Houston, Texas 77006

(713) 225

- 0666

October 6, 2015

Mr. Germain Lawon Davis

SPN # 02507078

Harris County Jail

1200 Baker Street

Houston, Texas 77002

Re: Germain Lawon Davis v. State of Te xas, Cause Number 01

- 13

- 00947

-

CR

Dear Mr. Davis:

Enclosed are copies of the opinion of the Court of Appeals in your

case, a motion for extension of time for you to file a pro se petition for

discretionary review in the Court of Criminal Appeals, and a copy of my

motion to withdraw as attorney of record. I am sorry to say that, in my

professional opinion further appeal would be pointless.

Should you have any questions, please let me know.

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Sincerely,

Terrence Gaiser

TG/cc

Enclosures

CMRRR 7014 0510 0000 0090 2988

NO. 01

- 13

- 00947

- CRIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

FROM THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

GERMAIN LAWON DAVIS, APPELLANT

VS.

STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE



### MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TERRENCE GAISER

LAWYER FOR

APPELLANT

2900 SMITH STREET, # 220

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006

SBOT# 07572500

713/ 225

- 0666

tagaiser@aol.com

NO. 1330760STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

§

VS. § HARRIS COUNTY,TEXAS

§

GERMAIN LAWON DAVIS § 182ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE

APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

NOW COMES GERMAIN DAVIS, appellant in the above

- captioned

cause, by and through his attorney, TERRENCE GAISER, and files his

Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File Appellant’s Petition for

Discretionary Review; for which he would show:

1.) Appel lant appeals from a judgment of guilt and sentence of life without

parole the offense of capital murder

2.) On September 24, 2015, a panel of the First Court of Appeals in Cause

No. 01

- 13

- 00947

- CR, Germain Lawon Davis v. State of Texas, issued a

memorandu m opinion affirming appellant’s conviction. No motion for

rehearing was filed.. Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due

on Monday, October 26, 2015. This is the first requested extension.

Appellant requests a thirty

- day extension to and in cluding November 26,

2015.

3.) This extension is being sought for the following reasons:After fter careful review of the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the

transcript of this case, in counsel’s professional opinion, further review of

this case would be frivolous and without further merit. Counsel has

informed appellant of his right to seek discretionary review, pro se , and will

inform appellant of this request for extension.

4.) Counsel will file a motion to withdraw as attorney of record in the F irst

Court of Appeals and will inform appellant, by copy of that motion.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, appellant prays for an extension

of time to file appellant’s petition for discretionary review to and including

October 26, 2015.

Respectfully S ubmitted,

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser

TERRENCE GAISER

LAWYER FOR APPELLANT

2900 SMITH STREET, STE. 220

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006

(713) 225

- 0666

SBN# 07572500

tagaiser@aol.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE ABOVE AND

FOREGOING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN

WHICH TO FILE A PDR WAS SERVED ON ALL PARTIES

ACCORDING TO THE RULES.

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser

TERRENCE GAISER