IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 22-0076 

## corroNwoop ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER, GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION, JOHN PHILLIP MEYER, AND MONTANA RIVERS,

Petitioners,

v. AUSTIN KNUDSEN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent. ORDER 

# FILED MAR 1 52022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana • Petitioners have filed an original action pursuant to § 13-27-316, MCA, objecting to the Attorney General's official actions on Petitioner's proposed ballot initiative 1-24. Petitioners' objection allegesthat theAttorney General'srevised ballot statement does not satisfy the requirements of§ 13-27-312, MCA. Weresolvethe dispute aboutthe statement text with the language presented below. Section 13-27-312(4), MCA, governs the language that communicates the purpose of a ballot initiative to voters. The text must be a "title and impartial explanation ofthe proposed ballot issue in plain, easily understood language and may not be arguments or written so as to create prejudice for or against the issue." The aim ofthe initial step in the process, when staff at the Legislative Services Division help proponents craft their language, is to ensure at the outset that it meets this standard. See § 13-27-302(1)(a), (2), MCA. The Attorney General'sreview serves as another opportunity toensure there are no linguistic issues with communicating the measure plainly and impartially, as does this Court's review in a proceeding under § 13-27-316(1), MCA. 03/15/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0076The languagethat the Legislative Services Division crafted with Petitioners for 1-24

was the following: "Outstanding resource water" is a designation that affords a body ofwater the greatest protection feasible under state law, after thorough examination. The Department ofEnvironmental Quality (DEQ) may not allow a new or increased point source discharge that would result in a permanent change in thewater quality ofan outstandingresourcewater. "Point source is defined in 75-5-103, MCA. Passing this initiative would make outstanding resource watersontheGallatinRiver fromtheboundary ofYellowstoneNationalPark to the confluence ofSpanish Creek, and on the Madison River from Hebgen Lake to Ennis Lake. Passage would also amend 75-5-316(2), MCA, to prohibit the DEQ from allowing a new or increased point source discharge that would result in any temporary or permanent change in water quality. The Attorney General modified this language. He argues that the text above is not sufficiently plain and easy to understand given its reference to complicated terms like "point source." The Attorney General's version ofthe 1-24 text was the following: [Initiative number] prohibits DEQ from approving a permit for any new or increased point source discharge ifthe permit would result in any change in water quality, including a temporary change in water quality, for "outstanding resource waters." [Initiative number] bypasses the existing review process for designating an "outstanding resource water:" which includes local government consultation, review of social and economic impacts, and an environmental impact stateinent, and deems the Gallatin River from the boundary ofYellowstone National Park to the confluence of Spanish Creek, and on the Madison River from Hebgen Lake to Ennis Lake to be "outstanding resource waters" without the review and consultation process. Petitioners argue that the Attorney General's version makes the language unclear because it focuses on distracting procedural technicalities that they argue are included to discourage voters from approving the measure. They contend that the Attorney General's versionis less ofanunderstandable statement aboutthe initiativethantheirs, andtheypoint out that it, too, uses complicated terms including "point source." After review, this Court has determined that the ballot statement the Attorney General certified to the Secretary ofState is confusing and convoluted. As such, it fails to satisfy the standard from § 13-27-312, MCA. Under § 13-27-316(3)(c)(ii), MCA, this 2Court may "certify to the secretary ofstate a statement that the court determines will meet

the requirements of" § 13-27-312, MCA, and such statement "certified by the court must beplacedonthepetition forcirculation and onthe official ballot." Followingthisstatutory approach and our review obligation, we determine that the following statement of implication comports with the statutory and constitutional requirements: 1-24 declares portions ofthe Gallatin and Madison Rivers north and west of Yellowstone National Park to be "Outstanding Resource Waters." The stretches ofwater that 1-24 would designate run from Yellowstone National Park to the confluence of Spanish Creek on the Gallatin River and from Hebgen Lake to Ennis Lake on the Madison River. 1-24 bypasses the existing review process for such a designation, including the local government consultation, review of social and economic impacts, and environmental impact statement that would be involved. 1-24 alsoprohibitsthe Statefrom approvingapermit forany neworincreased dischargeintoOutstandingResource Waters ifthepermitwould result in any adverse change in water quality, including only a temporary change. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to § 13-27-316(3)(c)(ii),MCA, the above language is hereby certified to the Secretary of State as meeting the requirements of § 13-27-312, MCA, and must be placed on the petition for circulation and on the official ballot if qualified by sufficient signatures. The Clerk is directed to provide notice ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and the Montana Secretary ofState. DATED this day ofMarch, 2022.

ChiefJustice

3

# /Ai Ai -411,

.--, Gic---....

. e Justices

4