alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Packeteer, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Dave Côté, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                     |  |     |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2003 |  | /s/ |  | DAVE CÔTÉ                                      
|                     |  |     |  |                                                
|                     |  |     |  | Dave Côté
President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1550 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1550

To provide that no Federal funds may be obligated for any purpose with 
respect to the Berz-Macomb Airport in Macomb County, Michigan, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 1993

  Mr. Bonior introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that no Federal funds may be obligated for any purpose with 
respect to the Berz-Macomb Airport in Macomb County, Michigan, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING.

    No Federal funds appropriated or made available after the date of 
the enactment of this Act may be obligated for any purpose with respect 
to the Berz-Macomb Airport in Macomb County, Michigan.

SEC. 2. NOISE REDUCTION.

    (a) Feasibility Study.--The Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
reducing the noise impact from aircraft taking off and landing at the 
Berz-Macomb Airport in Macomb County, Michigan, on residential 
neighborhoods in the vicinity of the airport. In conducting the study, 
the Administrator shall consider changing aircraft takeoff and landing 
patterns and heights.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of 
the study conducted under subsection (a), together with any 
recommendations (including legislative recommendations) necessary to 
reduce the noise impact of aircraft taking off and landing at the Berz-
Macomb Airport.

                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte LOVE.

No. 25974.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1952.

Winston P. Brummett and A. W. Sal-yars, Lubbock, for appellant.

A. W. Walker, County Atty., Spur, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for' the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

•Relator was cpnvicted for a violation of the liquor law and appealed his case to this •court. See Love v. State, Tex.'Cr.App., 249 S.W.2d 628. Pending the appeal he was tried in the District Court on a charge of perjury growing out of his testimony in the liquor case in the county court. The jury acquitted him. Appellant then attempted to abate the prosecution in this court, claiming some kind of grounds for res judicata, the nature of which we are not yet able to approve as proper procedure. It was not incumbent upon the court to write on the question but, because of its novel nature, we did so. If the question should be considered as before us at this time, we affirm the opinions in the foregoing citation.

After the affirmance of the case in this court mandate issued and appellant was taken into custody. He then brought this action in a habeas corpus proceeding before the county judge, seeking his release, in which he raised the same question that we passed oh in the reported case. It is clearly an effort to rerappeal his county court conviction and raise the question of his subsequent acquittal for perjury. We re-state that the subsequent action of another court could have no effect whatsoever on the judgment of the county court herein attacked.

We forego further discussion of the procedure by which the question comes to us. It is sufficient to say that the judge of the county court entered a proper order in the case now before us and his judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         December 1, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Holiday Inn, Bethesda, MD 20017.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eric H Brown, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, Room 7204, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 22, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-30711  Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. ) DOCKET OST-2010-0233

 ) 

for renewal of exemption authority ) 

(U.S.-Ecuador) ) 

__________________________________________) 

APPLICATION OF CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC.

FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr.

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500

(202) 747-5212

john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC.

 

NOTICE: Any person may support or oppose this application by filing an 

answer and serving a copy of the answer on counsel for 

Centurion and upon persons served with this application no 

later than June 26, 2014.

June 11, 2014
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. ) DOCKET OST-2010-0233

 ) June 11, 2014

for renewal of exemption authority ) 

(U.S.-Ecuador) ) 

__________________________________________) 

APPLICATION OF CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC.

FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(c), Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. 

(“Centurion”) respectfully requests renewal of the above-captioned 

exemption, granted by Notice of Action Taken dated August 15, 2012, for an 

additional, two-year period. The Notice permits Centurion to engage in 

scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail: (1) from a point or 

points in the United States, via intermediate points, to a point or points in 

Ecuador and beyond, and (2) from Ecuador to any point or points; the Notice 

also integrates this exemption authority with Centurion’s existing authority. 

Centurion intends to invoke the automatic extension provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 

558(c) and Part 377 of the Department's Special Regulations; this application 

is timely pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 377.10. In support of this application, 

Centurion states as follows: 
- 2 - Centurion

Renewal Application

1. Centurion first obtained U.S.-Ecuador authority in 2002. The 

Department has consistently found that Centurion is operationally and 

financially qualified to conduct U.S.-Ecuador operations and that grant of the 

authority is consistent with the aviation agreement between the United 

States and Ecuador. 

2. Centurion submits that renewal of the authority remains in the 

public interest and consistent with U.S.-Ecuador relations. Centurion’s 

frequent operations between the U.S. and Ecuador have been well-received 

by the shipping public. Information officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of 

the Department’s Procedural Regulations supports Centurion’s continued 

fitness for U.S.-Ecuador service. Renewal will not constitute a major 

regulatory action under Part 313 of the Department’s regulations and the 

Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. Finally, the authority to be 

renewed is contemplated by the 2010 Protocol to the U.S.-Ecuador Air 

Transport Agreement, which grants U.S. all-cargo carriers broad rights.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1346

AN ACT

To redesignate the Federal building located on St.

tian Federal Building’’.Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Almeric L. Chris-
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1346

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as the ‘‘Almeric L. Christian Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located on St. Croix, Virgin Is5 lands, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Almeric L.

6 Christian Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 1346 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Almeric L. Christian Federal Build6 ing’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.2


 


Dyax
Corp.

Summary of Current Compensation for

Named Executive Officers


 


The following table sets
forth for 2005 the current base salaries and target bonus potential of Dyax
Corp.’s Chief Executive Officer and its four other most highly compensated
executive officers, also known collectively as the named executive
officers.  The Compensation Committee of
the Dyax’s Board of Directors reviews base salaries and the bonus program for
these executives annually.  The actual
bonuses awarded for 2005 performance will be determined and paid in 2006.  The Compensation Committee will determine the
2005 bonus for the Chief Executive Officer based entirely on the Committee’s
assessment of Dyax’s performance against corporate goals.  For the other executive officers, one half of
the potential bonus will also be based on the same corporate performance
assessment and the remainder of the bonus potential will be based on the
Committee’s judgment regarding individual performance against objectives
determined by the Chief Executive Officer.


 


	
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  2005 Salary

  	
   

  	
  2005 Target Bonus

  (% of Base Salary)(1)

  	
   

  
	
  Henry E. Blair

  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  500,000

  	
   

  	
  40

  	
  %

  
	
  Stephen S.
  Galliker

  Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial
  Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  280,081

  	
   

  	
  35

  	
  %

  
	
  Ivana
  Magovcevic-Liebisch, Ph.D., J.D.

  Senior Vice President Legal Affairs, Chief Patent Counsel and Assistant
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  281,875

  	
   

  	
  30

  	
  %

  
	
  Clive R. Wood,
  Ph.D.

  Senior Vice President Discovery Research and Chief Science Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  275,000

  	
   

  	
  30

  	
  %

  
	
  Lynn G. Baird,
  Ph.D.

  Senior Vice President, Development

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  261,375

  	
   

  	
  28

  	
  %

  



 










(1)          The target bonus
opportunity can be exceeded by up to 20% of the target for exceptional
performance.  For example, an executive
with a target bonus of 30% who has outstanding performance can receive a bonus
of as much as 36% of base salary.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                     
<ARTICLE>                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
                       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                            15,392
<SECURITIES>                                      22,755
<RECEIVABLES>                                    363,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                      21,466
<INVENTORY>                                      329,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 719,370
<PP&E>                                         1,001,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                   436,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,885,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            265,352
<BONDS>                                          837,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             684
<OTHER-SE>                                       615,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,885,942
<SALES>                                        2,182,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,182,347
<CGS>                                          1,814,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,814,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  48,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   6,457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                65,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   75,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                      33,747
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               41,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (697)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      40,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.65
        
 

</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1513 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1513
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                                 An Act

  
 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 10th and Main 
Streets in

    Richmond, Virginia, as the ``Lewis F. Powell, Jr. United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LEWIS F. POWELL, JR. UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse located at 10th and Main Streets in 
Richmond, Virginia, is designated as the ``Lewis F. Powell, Jr. United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any references in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the courthouse referred to in 
section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Lewis F. Powell, Jr. 
United States Courthouse''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

May 24, 2024

CR-2023-0963

David Otto Jacobson v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Etowah Circuit Court: DC23-1514 and CC-23-727) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on May 24, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-reference cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 3 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 3

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the disapproval of obligations under the Emergency Economic 
                       Stabilization Act of 2008.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
obligation of any amount exceeding the amounts obligated as described 
in

              

 paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 115(a) of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 22, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### BERNDT v. TEXAS INDEMNITY INS. CO.

No. 3683.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

May 23, 1940.

Harper & Abright and Ray Holder, all of Dallas, for appellant.

Webster Atwell and John A. Pace, both of Dallas, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This was an action in district court of Dallas county by appellant, Mrs. Alice Berndt, as guardian of her husband, Fred R. Berndt, a non compos mentis, against appel-lee, Texas Indemnity Insurance Company, to set aside a compromise settlement of a claim under our Workmen’s Compensation Act, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq., duly approved by the Industrial Accident Board. On trial to a jury, judgment was for appellee on an instructed verdict, from which appellant attempted to prosecute her appeal to the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals. The case is on our docket by order of transfer by the Supreme Court.

The case is before us without a statement of facts or a bill of exceptions. The court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of the litigation. On appellant's pleadings, if the evidence failed to raise in her favor the issues plead by her as grounds of relief, it was the duty of the court, on appellee’s answer, to instruct the verdict in its favor. Without a statement of facts or a bill of exceptions, we must presume that the court correctly instructed the verdict in favor of appellee, and that judgment was correctly entered on the instructed verdict, that appellant recover nothing against appellee and that appellee go hence without day and recover its costs. Dunaway v. Easter, Tex.Com.App., 129 S.W.2d 286; Murphy v. Carter, Court Civ. Appeals Beaumont, 125 S.W.2d 384; King v. Furay, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 1029; Piner v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 119 S.W.2d 164; Uvalde Const. Co. v. Joiner, Tex.Com.App., 126 S.W.2d 22; 3 T.J., p. 555, sec. 389.

We pretermit a discussion of appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

It follows that the judgment of the lower court, should be affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.