alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
                                                                          
<S>                             <C>                                       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                                              
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1998                            
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1997    
<CASH>                                               62900
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        56700
<ALLOWANCES>                                           400
<INVENTORY>                                         327000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    500200
<PP&E>                                              269500
<DEPRECIATION>                                       66300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      754000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               280300
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               300
<OTHER-SE>                                          388100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        754000
<SALES>                                             376900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    376900
<CGS>                                               270500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       270500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     99000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (1400)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       8800
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   5800
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          5800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .16
                                               


</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-212V

(E-Filed: April 16, 2014)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

CAYLEE HARRINGTON, a married * UNPUBLISHED

woman, *

* Order Concluding Proceedings; More

Petitioner, * Than One Petition for Same Vaccine

* Admninistration

 * 

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On January 17, 2014, petitioner filed a petition in case number 14-43V, alleging 

that the second HPV vaccine administered on January 19, 2011, caused her to develop a 

number of symptoms including constant severe numbness, pain and tingling in her legs, 

and arms, numbness in her torso, numbness in her face, trouble chewing food and 

swallowing, memory loss, nausea, and vomiting. On March 14, 2014, Petitioner filed a 

substantially similar petition in case number 14-212V, which is the instant case, alleging 

1

 Because this unpublished Order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, the undersigned intends to post this Order on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-

347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). 

In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to 

delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). 

Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a 

proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified 

material fits within the requirements of that provision, the undersigned will delete such 

material from public access.

 
that the Gardasil vaccine that she received on January 19, 2011, caused her to suffer a 

vaccine-related injury with a similar constellation of symptoms alleged in the first filed 

petition.

Under the Vaccine Act, “Only one petition may be filed with respect to each 

administration of a vaccine.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(b)(2) (2012). The undersigned 

DISMISSES this petition for being in violation of the Vaccine Act’s prohibition of filing 

more than one petition with respect to the same vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Proceedings are concluded in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

 Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master

2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 337 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 337

 To designate the month of September 1994 as ``National Sewing Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 1994

Mr. Petri introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the month of September 1994 as ``National Sewing Month''.

Whereas the sewing industry annually honors the approximately 30,000,000 people 
        who sew at home;
Whereas the home sewing industry generates over $3,500,000,000 annually for the 
        economy of the United States; and
Whereas innumerable careers in fashion, retail merchandising, design, pattern 
        making, and textiles have had their beginnings in the home and in 
        elementary school home economics classes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the month of September 
1994 is hereby designated as ``National Sewing Month''. The President 
is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe this month with the appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 32.1



Principal Executive Officers Certification Pursuant
ToSection 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of American Natural Energy
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael K. Paulk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Michael K. Paulk



Michael K. Paulk Chief Executive Officer March 31, 2011

---
#### I. V. McELROY, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 20740.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1939.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for cattle theft, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, and at his request the same is dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0165 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. IOLA MAERRIEA JOHNSTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 28, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2022

01/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0165
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dealton Brantley, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: During the trial, a prosecution witness informed the prosecutor that he recognized one of the jurors as being a friend of his mother. The prosecutor immediately informed defense counsel and the Trial Judge, who examined the juror in the presence of counsel. She revealed that she had been friends with the witness’s mother 20 years ago, but that she hardly knew the witness, recognizing him because he resembled his father. She unequivocally stated that her past friendship with the witness’s mother would not affect her ability to be impartial.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion for a mistrial. During trial, a juror may be discharged only if that juror "is grossly unqualified to serve in the case” (CPL 270.35). Following a colloquy, the court determined that the juror did not possess " ' "a state of mind which would prevent the rendering of an impartial verdict” ’ ” *(People v Rodriguez,*71 NY2d 214, 219), and the court’s determination is supported by the record *(People v Rodriguez, supra,*at 220).

Defendant argues that reversal is required because the court conducted a portion of voir dire at the Bench outside of defendant’s presence. By failing to object to this procedure, defendant has failed to preserve this issue for review *(see, People v Dunlap,*161 AD2d 1114; *People v Blake,*158 AD2d 979, *lv denied*75 NY2d 964).

The court erred by permitting the prosecutor to bolster a witness’s testimony by admitting a prior consistent statement, even though that testimony had not been attacked as a recent fabrication; however, we conclude that this error was harmless *(see, People v Smith,*136 AD2d 935, *lv denied*71 NY2d 903). While the court failed specifically to instruct the jury that the prosecutor’s case was based entirely upon circumstantial evidence, defendant, by failing to object to the charge as given, has failed to preserve any alleged error for review. We decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice, because the court’s instructions defining circumstantial evidence and setting forth the strict "moral certainty” test to be applied in cases based solely upon circumstantial evidence adequately conveyed to the jury the proper standard to be applied by them when analyzing the proof in this case.

*950The proof, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People, is legally sufficient to support the conviction for possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree. We have examined the remaining issues raised by defendant and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, fourth degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at October 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Income for the Nine
Months Ended October 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,081,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               67,166,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,394,255
<INVENTORY>                                  6,694,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,026,362
<PP&E>                                      27,113,915
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,880,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             158,279,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,489,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       180,927
<OTHER-SE>                                 113,223,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               158,279,053
<SALES>                                     73,424,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            73,424,011
<CGS>                                       46,138,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,109,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,770,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,452,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,058,863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,393,177
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,393,177
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
exv10w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




Amendment Adopted November 15, 2004 by Board of Directors

and Approved by the Shareholders on January 31, 2005

to the

SurModics, Inc.

2003 Equity Incentive Plan




     The number of shares reserved and available under the Plan is increased from 600,000 shares to
2,400,000 shares by hereby amending the second sentence of Section 6 of the Plan to read in its
entirety as follows:




“Two Million Four Hundred Thousand (2,400,000) shares of Option Stock shall be reserved and
available for options and stock awards under the Plan; provided, however, that the total
number of shares of Option Stock reserved for options and stock awards under this Plan shall
be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12 of the Plan.”



22
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1486

To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to decrease the number of loans made

under section 502 of such Act and increase the regular payments made

by borrowers under such loans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1993

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Housing Act of 1949 to decrease the number

of loans made under section 502 of such Act and increase the regular payments made by borrowers under

such loans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON LOAN AUTHORITY.

4 Section 502 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C.

5 1472) is amended by adding at the end the following new

6 subsection:
2

•HR 1486 IH

1 ‘‘(i) LIMITATION ON LOAN AUTHORITY.—The total

2 number of loans made under this section in any single fis3 cal year may not exceed 12,500.’’.

4 SEC. 2. MINIMUM PAYMENTS UNDER LOANS.

5 Section 502(b)(2) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42

6 U.S.C. 1472(b)(2)) is amended by inserting after the

7 comma the following: ‘‘except that such plans and sched8 ules shall require the borrower to make regular payments

9 in an amount not less than the amount equal to 30 percent

10 of the income of the borrower, and’’.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Principal Executive Officers Certification Pursuant To
Section 1350 In connection with the Annual Report of American Natural Energy Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael K. Paulk, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael K. Paulk Michael K. Paulk
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005
Amended Servicing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.8 
  
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE 2002 AMENDED SERVICING AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made this 6th day of January, 2005 to that certain 2002 Amended Servicing Agreement (“Agreement”) by and between BOSTON SERVICE
COMPANY, INC. (“BSC”) and AUTO LENDERS LIQUIDATION CENTER, INC. (“Auto Lenders”). 
  
 BACKGROUND 
  
 BSC and Auto Lenders wish to amend the Amended Servicing Agreement by changing language in the Second Amendment to the 2002 Servicing Agreement and
inserting additional language to Paragraph 4 – Delivery & Reconditioning of Vehicles and by inserting the agreed upon Servicing Fee for calendar year 2007 within Paragraph 9. All other terms and conditions remain in full force and effect.

  
 Language change to Second Amendment to the
Amended Servicing Agreement 
  
 Paragraph
9 – Consideration 
  
 The addition of a sentence to the second paragraph
of the amended Paragraph 9 which shall read as follows: 
  
 The quarterly payment
dates as identified will be reclassified as $100,000 as the Guarantee Fee and $300,000 as a Recon Center Fee. 
  
 Change to Fourth Amendment to the Amended Servicing Agreement 
  
 Amendment to Paragraph 4 – Delivery and Reconditioning of Vehicles 
  
 The paragraph will limit the amount of reimbursed expense by BSC to Auto Lenders covering the period of 02/01/05 through
01/31/06 to $625,000 per month. This amount will only apply to invoices dated during the year 2005 and submitted for reimbursement. 
  
 Amendment to Paragraph 9 – Consideration 
  

This Paragraph shall be amended as it pertains to the Guarantee Fees found under Paragraph B (iv) and Paragraph B (v) in which the agreed upon
Guarantee Fee for the calendar year 2007 will appear as follows and the revised percentage as it applies to Frame Damage shall become effective with the date shown: 
  
 The Guarantee Fee will be $250,000 per month for the period 01/01/07 through 12/31/07. 
  
 The fee in the case of Frame Damage shall be 20% of the stated residual value
to be effective with all such submissions effective 01/01/05. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BSC and Auto Lenders have caused this Fifth Amendment to the 2002 Amended Servicing Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized corporate officers and their corporate seals to be affixed hereto the day and year written beneath their signatures below; each intending this Amendment shall become effective on the date first written above.

  

							
	 	 	 	 	 AUTO LENDERS LIQUIDATION CENTER, INC.

				
	 Attest:
	 	 /s/ Kathleen M. Dragg

	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Michael J. Wimmer


	 [Assistant] Secretary
	 	 Title:
	 	 
			
	 (Corp. Seal)
	 	 Dated:
	 	 1-6-05

			
	 	 	 	 	 BOSTON SERVICE COMPANY, INC. t/a

	 	 	 	 	 HANN FINANCIAL SERVICE CORP.

				
	 Attest:
	 	 /s/ Jeri L. Dooley

	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Charles L. Dovico


	 [Assistant] Secretary
	 	 Title:
	 	 President & CEO

			
	 (Corp. Seal)
	 	 Dated:
	 	 1/6/05
exv10w1



 






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.1




April 14, 2005




Dear Ms. Williams,


As President of Cray Inc. I am pleased to offer you employment with Cray as Senior Vice President
(SVP) of Engineering. Jim Rottsolk and myself are certain that you are the right person to work as
one of the top executives in the company to move Cray to the next level and return our company to
leadership. There is little doubt that you’ll make a valuable contribution to the Company’s future
success.



In your position as SVP, Engineering you would report directly to me and you would have an
organization of nearly 400 people reporting to you, including all of hardware and software
engineering in the U.S. and Canada across four major locations.



Your base salary would be $300,000. In addition, you will participate in the annual executive
bonus plans as approved from time to time by the Board of Directors. Your target bonus will be
50%—under the executive bonus plan, the actual bonus can vary from no bonus to 100% of your base.
In addition, we will pay you a sign-on bonus within 60 day after employment of $125,000. (If you
decide to leave Cray before 12 months, you will have to return the full value of the sign-on bonus
to Cray.)



When you become an employee you will receive an option to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock which will become fully exercisable at the end of 2005. The exercise prices will be as
follows:





	 	•  	50,000 at the current market price for Cray shares the day you become an employee;
	 
	 	•  	50,000 at 120% of that price;
	 
	 	•  	50,000 at 140% of that price; and
	 
	 	•  	50,000 at 160% of that price.




Obviously, we all hope that the Company prospers, that the Company’s stock reflects that success,
and that the option shares become a valuable investment for you.



I have enclosed a copy of the Cray Executive Severance Policy. Concurrently with your joining the
company, the Board will amend this policy so that in the event of a termination during the first
two years of your employment, other than for cause, you would receive a severance payment of two
times your base salary.



Cray provides a variety of benefits including health and dental care, life insurance, a Section 125
Flexible Spending Plan, a 401 (k) Plan, a stock purchase plan, as well as paid holidays and sick
leave. As an officer, your vacation will not have a limit and will not be accrued. Documents
summarizing the plans are enclosed.




 









 







We consider the terms of this offer to be confidential. Employment would commence as soon as you
are available.



I’m sure that you know how excited we are about the chance to work closely with you again and while
there clearly is a lot of work ahead, there should also be a lot of success and fun. To indicate
your acceptance of this offer, please sign and return one copy of this letter to my confidential
fax number.




Sincerely,




/s/ Peter J. Ungaro




Peter J. Ungaro

President



Accepted By: /s/ Margaret Ann Williams, this 25th day of April 2005

                                        Ms. Williams