`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1392 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1392

      To rescind unauthorized appropriations for fiscal year 1993.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1993

Mr. Fawell (for himself, Mr. Penny, Mr. Shays, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Walker, 
Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Petri, Mr. Ballenger, 
    Mr. Allard, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
 Manzullo, Mr. Orton, Mr. Sundquist, Mr. Klug, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Stump, 
and Mr. Knollenberg) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
      To rescind unauthorized appropriations for fiscal year 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Spending Priority 
Reform Act of 1993''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents.
Sec. 2. Use of money for deficit reduction.
                  TITLE I--AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 101. Cooperative State Research Service--special research grants.
Sec. 102. Cooperative State Research Service--buildings and facilities.
  TITLE II--COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED 
                        AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS

                   Subtitle A--Department of Commerce

Sec. 201. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sec. 202. International Trade Administration.
                      Subtitle B--Related Agencies

Sec. 211. Small Business Administration.
                    Subtitle C--Department of State

Sec. 221. Educational and cultural exchange programs.
Sec. 222. North/South Center.
                   TITLE III--DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS

         Subtitle A--Research, Development, Test and Evaluation

Sec. 301. Defense agencies--university grants.
Sec. 302. Defense agencies--electric vehicle technology.
Sec. 303. Army.
Sec. 304. Medical research.
Sec. 305. Navy.
Sec. 306. Air Force.
            Subtitle B--Other Department of Defense Programs

Sec. 311. Defense health programs.
                 Subtitle C--Operations and Maintenance

Sec. 321. Self-powered locks.
Sec. 322. Athletic competitions.
Sec. 323. Army.
Sec. 324. Defense agencies.
Sec. 325. Hawaii volcano observatory.
               TITLE IV--ENERGY AND WATER APPROPRIATIONS

                     Subtitle A--Corps of Engineers

Sec. 401. General investigations.
Sec. 402. Construction, general.
                    Subtitle B--Department of Energy

Sec. 411. General investigations.
                    TITLE V--INTERIOR APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 501. National Park Service.
Sec. 502. United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
Sec. 503. National Forest Service.
                TITLE VI--TRANSPORTATION APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 601. Airway science grants.
Sec. 602. Highway research, development, and technology.
Sec. 603. Federal-aid highways.
Sec. 604. Federal highway demonstration projects.
Sec. 605. Transit planning and research.
      TITLE VII--TREASURY, POSTAL SERVICE, AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT 
                             APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 701. General Services Administration.
Sec. 702. Office of Personnel Management.
   TITLE VIII--VETERANS AFFAIRS, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND 
                  INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS

               Subtitle A--Department of Veterans Affairs

Sec. 801. Construction grants.
                    Subtitle B--Independent Agencies

Sec. 811. EPA--research and development.
Sec. 812. EPA--abatement, control, and compliance.
Sec. 813. EPA--buildings and facilities.
Sec. 814. Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Sec. 815. NASA--research and development.
Sec. 816. NASA--construction of facilities.
        Subtitle C--Department of Housing and Urban Development

Sec. 821. Special purpose grants.
                    TITLE IX--BLUE SMOKE AND MIRRORS

Sec. 901. Sense of the Congress.

SEC. 2. USE OF MONEY FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.

    It is the sense of the Congress that any money returned to the 
Treasury as a result of this Act should be deposited in the General 
Fund of the Treasury to be applied against the Federal budget deficit.

                  TITLE I--AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATIONS

SEC. 101. COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE--SPECIAL RESEARCH GRANTS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        special research grants provided by the Secretary of 
        Agriculture under section 2(c) of the Act of August 4, 1965 (7 
        U.S.C. 450i(c)); and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
        Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-341; 106 Stat. 878-879); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following amounts provided for special 
research grants (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5487, House Report 
102-815, pages 10-12):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aflatoxin (IL)............................................      $134,000
Agribusiness management (MS)..............................       $75,000
Agricultural diversification (HI).........................      $154,000
Agricultural management systems (MA)......................      $261,000
Agricultural processing (GA)..............................       $50,000
Agricultural trade (ND)...................................      $350,000
Alfalfa (KS)..............................................      $125,000
Alternative cropping systems (Southeast)..................      $278,000
Alternative crops (ND)....................................      $700,000
Alternative marine and fresh water species (MS)...........      $275,000
Alternative pest control (AR).............................    $1,400,000
Alternative to dinoseb (OR)...............................      $225,000
Animal waste disposal (MI)................................      $120,000
Apple quality research (MI)...............................       $94,000
Aquaculture (general).....................................      $316,000
Aquaculture (MS)..........................................      $700,000
Aquaculture research (IL).................................      $200,000
Aquaculture (LA)..........................................      $390,000
Asparagus yield decline (MI)..............................       $94,000
Babcoc Institute (WI).....................................       $75,000
Bean and beet (MI)........................................      $189,000
Beef carcass evaluation and identification (IA, NY, GA,                 
 TX, IL)..................................................      $210,000
Beef fat content (IA).....................................      $237,000
Biodiesel research (MO)...................................       $50,000
Broom snakeweed (NM)......................................      $200,000
Canola (KS)...............................................      $100,000
Celery fusarium (MI)......................................       $39,000
Center for animal health and productivity (PA)............      $134,000
Center for rural studies (VT).............................       $37,000
Chesapeake Bay aquaculture (MD)...........................      $437,000
Competitiveness of agricultural products (WA).............      $800,000
CONSOIL (WI)..............................................      $725,000
Controlled environment production systems (PA)............      $240,000
Cool season legume research (ID, WA)......................      $387,000
Cottonseed extraction and oil refining (TX)...............       $75,000
Cranberry/blueberry disease and breeding (NJ).............      $260,000
Dairy goat research (TX)..................................       $75,000
Delta rural revitalization (MS)...........................      $175,000
Dogwood anthracnose (GA, NC, TN)..........................      $137,000
Dried bean (ND)...........................................      $100,000
Eastern filbert blight (OR)...............................       $85,000
Environmental research (NY)...............................      $575,000
Expanded wheat pasture (OK)...............................      $337,000
Export development (KY)...................................      $227,000
Farm computer technology (GA).............................      $100,000
Farm and rural business finance (IL, AK)..................      $125,000
Fish marketing (OR, RI)...................................      $340,000
Floriculture (HI).........................................      $296,000
Food and Agriculture Policy Institute (IA, MO)............      $750,000
Food irradiation (IA).....................................      $237,000
Food marketing policy center (CT).........................      $393,000
Food processing center (NE)...............................       $50,000
Food safety consortium (AR, KS, IA).......................    $1,942,000
Food systems research group (WI)..........................      $261,000
Forestry marketing (VT, NH)...............................       $50,000
Global change.............................................    $2,000,000
Grasshopper biocontrol (ND)...............................       $75,000
Great Plains agricultural policy center (KS, OK)..........      $100,000
Human nutrition research (NY).............................      $735,000
Human nutrition research (IA).............................      $500,000
Human nutrition (LA)......................................      $800,000
Improved dairy management practices (PA)..................      $335,000
Integrated pest management................................    $4,457,000
Integrated production systems (OK)........................      $190,000
Iowa biotechnology consortium (IA)........................    $2,000,000
Livestock and dairy policy (NY, TX).......................      $525,000
Lowbush blueberry research (ME)...........................      $185,000
Low-input agriculture (MN)................................      $230,000
Maple research (VT).......................................       $99,000
Michigan Institute........................................    $2,358,000
Midwest agricultural products.............................      $700,000
Midwest plant biotechnology consortium....................    $2,865,000
Milk safety (PA)..........................................      $184,000
Minor crop pest control (HI)..............................      $285,000
Minor use animal drugs (IR-4).............................      $464,000
Multi-commodity research (OR).............................      $300,000
Multi-cropping strategies for aquaculture.................      $150,000
National biological impact assessment.....................      $300,000
Nematode resistance genetic engineering (NM)..............      $150,000
New uses for agricultural products (OH)...................      $140,000
Non-food agricultural products (NE).......................      $110,000
Oil from jojoba (NM)......................................      $200,000
Oregon--Mass. biotechnology (MA)..........................      $256,000
Peach tree short life (SC)................................      $192,000
Perishable commodities (GA)...............................      $250,000
Pest control alternatives (SC)............................      $125,000
Pesticide clearance (IR-4)................................    $3,500,000
Pesticide impact assessment...............................    $2,968,000
Pesticide research (WA)...................................      $667,000
Phytophthora root rot (NM)................................      $150,000
Potato research...........................................    $1,435,000
Potato utilization (ND)...................................      $250,000
Poultry (GA)..............................................      $516,000
Preservation and processing research (OK).................      $267,000
Procerum root disease (VA)................................       $25,000
Product development and marketing center (ME).............      $221,000
Red River Corridor (MN, ND)...............................      $200,000
Regional barley gene mapping project......................      $412,000
Regionalized implications of farm programs (MO, TX).......      $348,000
Rural development centers (PA, IA, ND, MS, OR)............      $500,000
Rural environmental research (IL).........................      $125,000
Rural housing needs (NE)..................................       $80,000
Rural policies institute (AR, NE, MO).....................      $692,000
Russian wheat aphid (WA, OR, CA)..........................      $437,000
Safflower research (ND, MT)...............................      $250,000
Seafood and aquaculture harvesting, processing, and                     
 marketing (MS)...........................................      $361,000
Seafood research (OR).....................................      $327,000
Small fruit research (OR, WA, ID).........................      $187,000
Soil and water research (OH)..............................      $240,000
Southwest consortium for plant genetics and water                       
 resources................................................      $400,000
Soybean bioprocessing (IA)................................      $328,000
Soybean cyst nematode (MO)................................      $359,000
STEEP II--water quality in Northwest (ID, WA, OR).........      $980,000
Stone fruit decline (MI)..................................      $283,000
Subirrigation research (MI)...............................      $531,000
Sunflower insects (ND, SD)................................      $200,000
Sustainable agriculture and natural resources (PA)........      $100,000
Sustainable agriculture systems (NE)......................       $70,000
Swine research (MN).......................................      $140,000
TCK smut (wheat)..........................................      $250,000
Tropical and subtropical..................................    $3,320,000
Urban pests (GA)..........................................       $76,000
Water conservation (KS)...................................       $94,000
Water conservation (NV)...................................      $200,000
Water management (AL).....................................      $398,000
Water quality.............................................    $8,950,000
Weed control (ND).........................................      $500,000
Wheat genetic research (KS)...............................      $159,000
White mold research (OH)..................................       $55,000
Wild rice research (MN)...................................       $88,000
Wood utilization research (OR, MS, MI)....................    $4,153,000
Wool research (TX)........................................      $250,000
World food systems (IN, OH)...............................      $368,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


SEC. 102. COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE--BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the construction of buildings and facilities of the Cooperative 
        State Research Service; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
        Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-341; 106 Stat. 879); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following amounts provided for buildings and 
facilities (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5487, House Report 102-
815, pages 15-16):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poultry Center of Excellence (AR).........................    $3,189,000
Agriculture Research Complex-Environmental Stress Lab (AZ)    $1,100,000
Alternative pest control containment and quarantine,                    
 University of California.................................      $178,000
Grape Importation Facility, University of California at                 
 Davis....................................................      $582,000
Biotechnology Institute, University of Florida-Alachua....      $276,000
Center for Advanced Water Technology, Savannah, GA........      $376,000
 National Laboratory for Environmentally Sound Production               
 Agriculture, Tifton, GA..................................    $1,293,000
Vidalia Onion Storage Res. Facility (GA)..................      $194,000
Center for Tropical/Subtropical Agriculture (HI)..........    $3,311,000
Biotechnology Facility (ID)...............................      $431,000
Biotechnology Center, Northwestern University (IL)........      $517,000
Molecular and Cellular Biotechnology Facility (IN)........    $2,155,000
Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Kansas State University              
 (KS).....................................................    $1,353,000
Presque Isle Farm building construction (ME)..............      $776,000
Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Science,              
 University of Maryland (MD)..............................      $862,000
Center for hunger, poverty, nutrition and policy (MS).....      $484,000
Food Toxicology Center, Michigan State University.........    $4,616,000
Biological Technology Center for Water and Wetlands                     
 Resources (MS)...........................................       $86,000
Bioscience Research Laboratory, Montana State University..      $915,000
Biochemistry and Biology, University of Nevada............      $215,000
Plant Bioscience Facility, Rutgers University (NJ)........    $2,623,000
Cornell Research Greenhouse (NY)..........................      $376,000
New York Botanical Garden.................................    $3,697,000
Bowman-Gray Center at Wake Forest (NC)....................    $3,684,000
Food Processing Pilot Plant--NCI (ND).....................      $375,000
Inst/Ag Health Science and Rural Medicine, Univ. of North               
 Dakota (ND)..............................................    $1,864,000
Inst/Ag and Rural Human Research Development, Minot State               
 University (ND)..........................................    $1,939,000
Seed Research and Regulatory Facility, North Dakota State               
 University (ND)..........................................      $431,000
Plant Science Research Facility, University of Toledo (OH)      $237,000
Seafood Center, Oregon State University (OR)..............    $1,824,000
Center for Food Marketing, St. Joseph's University (PA)...    $2,336,000
Building consolidation, University of Rhode Island (RI)...      $431,000
Northern Plains Biostress Laboratory, South Dakota State                
 University (SD)..........................................      $875,000
Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Research                     
 Complex, University of Tennessee in Knoxville (TN).......      $797,000
Nursery Crop Research Station (TN)........................      $367,000
Inst/Biosciences and Technology, Texas A & M (TX).........      $603,000
Biotechnology Laboratory, Utah State University (UT)......      $658,000
Agriculture Biotechnology Facility, Virginia Polytechnic                
 Institute (VA)...........................................      $880,000
Animal Disease Biotechnology Facility, Washington State                 
 University (WA)..........................................    $2,258,000
Agriculture Biotechnology/Genetics Facility, University of              
 Wisconsin/Madison (WI)...................................    $2,161,000
College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-                  
 Stevens Point (WI).......................................       $86,000
Environmental Simulation Facility, University of Wyoming                
 (WY).....................................................      $431,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

  TITLE II--COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED 
                        AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS

                   Subtitle A--Department of Commerce

SEC. 201. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        construction, the National Ocean Service, the National Marine 
        Fisheries Service, oceanic and atmospheric research, National 
        Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
        Administration construction, and miscellaneous projects; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference, 
                where so designated.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, 
        and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-395; 
        106 Stat. 1849-1850); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are as follows (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 
5678, House Report 102-918, pages 50-66):
            (1) National ocean service.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Great Lakes Mapping Projects..............................      $465,000
South Carolina Cooperative Geodetic Survey................      $554,000
Land Information Systems..................................    $1,674,000
Observation buoys (CA) (conference).......................      $140,000
Chesapeake Bay Observation buoys (conference).............      $400,000
Institute for Marine Engineers (conference)...............      $500,000
South Carolina Wetland Demonstration Project..............    $1,800,000
CZM program administration................................    $3,597,000
Charleston Special Area Management plan...................      $960,000
Hawaii Humpback Marine Sanctuary Institute................      $144,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (2) National marine fisheries service.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stuttgart Aquaculture (AR)................................      $576,000
Winter Run Chinook Salmon (conference)....................      $500,000
Center for Shark Research.................................      $140,000
Hawaii Stock Management...................................      $500,000
Fish Cooperative Institute................................      $384,000
Hawaiian Monk Seals.......................................      $520,000
Stellar Sea Lion Recovery Plan............................    $1,440,000
Hawaiian Sea Turtles......................................      $240,000
Atlantic Blue Fin Tuna Project............................      $300,000
Pacific pelagic species management........................    $1,606,000
Beluga Whale Committee....................................      $192,000
Dolphin Safe Technologies.................................      $500,000
East Coast Observers......................................      $700,000
Export Strategies/Mahi Mahi...............................      $768,000
Andromous Fishery Project.................................      $186,000
Fish Oils.................................................      $900,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (3) Oceanic and atmospheric research.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VENTS.....................................................    $2,496,000
S.E. U.S. FOCI Program....................................    $1,000,000
Upper New England Marine Research.........................    $1,900,000
NOAA Undersea Research Program............................   $15,998,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (4) National weather service.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agriculture and fruit frost...............................    $2,316,000
Fire Weather Services.....................................      $449,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            (5) National oceanic and atmospheric administration 
        construction.--


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boston Biotechnology Innovation Center (conference).......    $1,000,000
Woods Hole Marine Biology Center..........................    $1,000,000
U. of New Hampshire Biology Center........................   $15,000,000
Mystic, CT Maritime Education and Research Center                       
 (conference).............................................    $1,000,000
NMFS Charleston Fisheries Laboratory......................      $700,000
Beaufort, NC Laboratory...................................      $182,000
Juneau/Kodiak Laboratory A&E..............................      $100,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 202. INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        special research grants provided for the International Trade 
        Administration;
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, 
        and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-395; 
        106 Stat. 1851); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5678, House Report 102-918, page 67):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tailored Clothing Technology Corporation (TC 2)...........    $3,149,000
National Textile Center...................................    $7,448,000
New Materials Center......................................    $2,850,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Subtitle B--Related Agencies

SEC. 211. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        salaries and expenses; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, 
        and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-395; 
        106 Stat. 1862-1863); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are as follows:


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohio Dept. of Development International Trade project.....      $500,000
Small Business Databases (PA) and Transportation Linkages.    $1,000,000
Worchester Centrum and Exhibition Hall Infrastructure.....    $1,500,000
St. Vincent/Francis Center for Global Competitiveness.....      $800,000
Pittsburgh District Pilot Project.........................      $100,000
St. Louis Biomedical Center...............................      $400,000
Washington State University Research......................      $500,000
Hazard Community College..................................      $750,000
Morgan County High School.................................    $1,000,000
Kansas Small Business Development Center..................      $500,000
Vermont Small Business Development Center.................    $1,000,000
Technical Assistance Univ. of Arkansas....................      $465,000
Univ. of Kansas - Science & Tech..........................    $4,185,000
Massachusetts Biotech Institute...........................    $1,395,000
New York City Library.....................................      $930,000
Indiana State University Center for Interdisciplinary                   
 Studies..................................................    $1,395,000
Center for Manufacturing Products.........................      $465,000
St. Louis Biomedical Center...............................       $400,00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Subtitle C--Department of State

SEC. 221. EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the general enhancement of the exchange programs of the United 
        States Information Agency; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, 
        and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-395; 
        106 Stat. 1870-1871); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5678, House Report 102-918, page 97):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
World Scholar-Athlete Games...............................      $800,000
General Enhancement for Exchange Programs.................    $9,250,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 222. NORTH/SOUTH CENTER.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the North/South Center; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, 
        and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-395; 
        106 Stat. 1872); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amount.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5678, House Report 102-918, page 99):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
North/South Center at the University of Miami, in Miami,                
 Florida..................................................    $8,700,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


                   TITLE III--DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS

         Subtitle A--Research, Development, Test and Evaluation

SEC. 301. DEFENSE AGENCIES--UNIVERSITY GRANTS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        university grants; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1893-1895); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, pages 14-15):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Texas Regional Institute for Environmental Studies........    $5,000,000
University of Maryland....................................    $7,500,000
University of Scranton....................................    $3,500,000
Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute.   $15,000,000
Northeastern University...................................    $9,000,000
Colorado State University.................................    $5,000,000
Louisiana State University................................    $4,000,000
Illinois Institute of Technology..........................    $5,000,000
Loma Linda University.....................................    $5,000,000
University of Minnesota...................................    $2,000,000
University of Miami, Florida..............................    $2,000,000
University of Michigan....................................      $500,000
University of Pennsylvania................................    $7,500,000
Villanova University......................................    $2,000,000
Medical College of Ohio...................................    $1,000,000
Rochester Institute of Technology.........................    $3,000,000
Bryant College of Rhode Island............................    $2,000,000
Bradley University of Illinois............................    $7,500,000
University of South Florida...............................    $2,000,000
Science Center of Connecticut.............................    $3,000,000
National Biomedical Research Foundation...................   $10,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 302. DEFENSE AGENCIES--ELECTRIC VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        electrical vehicle demonstration projects; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1893); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 118):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For an electrical vehicle demonstration project in the                  
 State of Hawaii..........................................    $5,000,000
For an electrical vehicle demonstration project in                      
 Sacramento, CA, involving the McClellan Air Force Base                 
 and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District............    $2,500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 303. ARMY.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        industrial preparedness and manufacturing technology 
        development programs; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1890-1891); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, pages 125-126):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the establishment of a flexible manufacturing center                
 at the Scranton Army Ammunition Plant....................    $7,500,000
For large-scale investigation of the GP-160 Vaccine for                 
 Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome......................   $20,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 304. MEDICAL RESEARCH.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        medical research; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference, in 
                the case of $185,000,000 of the amount provided for the 
                item listed in subsection (c) relating to breast cancer 
                research.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1890-1891); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 119):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prostate cancer research..................................    $2,000,000
Breast cancer research....................................  $210,000,000
AIDS research.............................................   $58,891,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 305. NAVY.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        naval research, development, testing, and evaluation; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference, in 
                the case of the item listed in subsection (c) relating 
                to the West Virginia High Technology Corporation.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1891-1892); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, pages 126):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the West Virginia High Technology Corporation.........    $1,500,000
For the National Center for Acoustics, Mississippi                      
 Resource Development Corporation.........................    $1,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 306. AIR FORCE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        projects of the Space Surveillance Network Improvement Program; 
        and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1892); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 136):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To continue the Advanced Electro-Optical System project at              
 the Air Force Maui Optical Station.......................   $39,500,000
To continue the research program on development of coal-                
 based, high thermal stability and endothermic jet fuels..    $2,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            Subtitle B--Other Department of Defense Programs

SEC. 311. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAMS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        efforts to prevent brown tree snakes from entering Hawaii from 
        Guam; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1897); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 151):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For brown tree snakes.....................................    $1,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Subtitle C--Operations and Maintenance

SEC. 321. SELF-POWERED LOCKS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        providing, to the services and agencies funded by the 
        Department of Defense, self-powered locks necessary to initiate 
        a retrofit program to replace locks that do not meet current 
        specifications; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1878-1883); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 55):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Defense Logistics Agency to provide to the                      
 Services and Agencies self-powered locks.................   $15,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 322. ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the World University Competition, the 1996 Summer Olympics, and 
        World Cup USA 1994; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396<plus-minus>; 106 Stat. 1884-1885); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 51):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the World University Competition......................    $6,000,000
For the 1996 Summer Olympics..............................    $2,000,000
For World Cup USA 1994....................................    $9,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 323. ARMY.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        procurement of extended cold weather clothing systems; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1879); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 62):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the procurement of Extended Cold Weather Clothing                   
 Systems..................................................   $36,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 324. DEFENSE AGENCIES.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the study, assessment, and identification of nuclear waste 
        disposal by the former Soviet Union, and Project PEACE; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1928); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, pages 27 and 171):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the study, assessment, and identification of nuclear                
 waste disposal by the former Soviet Union in the Arctic                
 region...................................................   $10,000,000
For Project PEACE.........................................   $25,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 325. HAWAII VOLCANO OBSERVATORY.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        monitoring volcanic activity affecting the United States Army 
        Pohakuloa training area; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 
        102-396; 106 Stat. 1881); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5504, House Report 102-1015, page 77):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory for monitoring                     
 volcanic activity affecting the United States Army                     
 Pohakuloa Training Area..................................      $500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

               TITLE IV--ENERGY AND WATER APPROPRIATIONS

                     Subtitle A--Corps of Engineers

SEC. 401. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        surveys and planning activities of the Army Corps of Engineers; 
        and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. 
        L. 102-377; 106 Stat. 1317); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5373, House Report 102-866, page 25):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kaumalapau Harbor, HI.....................................      $500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 402. CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        construction of water resource projects of the Army Corps of 
        Engineers; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. 
        L. 102-377; 106 Stat. 1321-1322); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5373, House Report 102-866, pages 35-41):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Molly Ann's Brook, NJ.....................................    $1,000,000
St. George Harbor, AK.....................................    $3,000,000
Cochiti Lake, NM..........................................    $1,900,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Subtitle B--Department of Energy

SEC. 411. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        energy supply, research, and development activities; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. 
        L. 102-377; 106 Stat. 1333); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5373, House Report 102-866, pages 73-74):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bishop Science Center, HI.................................   $10,000,000
Ambulatory Research and Education Building, Oregon Health               
 Sciences University......................................   $10,000,000
Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, Louisiana                
 State University, Baton Rouge............................   $10,000,000
Advanced Technologies Institute, University of Connecticut   $10,000,000
Biomedical Research Facility, University of Alabama at                  
 Birmingham...............................................   $10,000,000
Cancer Treatment Facility for the Indiana University                    
 School of Medicine at Indianapolis.......................   $10,000,000
Cancer Institute of New Jersey............................   $10,000,000
Northeast Environmental Resource and Renewal Facility,                  
 Mayfield, Pennsylvania...................................    $6,800,000
Center for Advanced Industrial Process, Washington State                
 University, Washington...................................    $8,000,000
Hahnemann University Ambulatory Care and Teaching Center                
 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania............................   $10,000,000
Midwest Plant Biotechnology Consortium (U. of Chicago and               
 Washington U.)...........................................    $2,500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    TITLE V--INTERIOR APPROPRIATIONS

SEC. 501. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the operation of the National Park Service; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-381; 106 Stat. 1381-
        1383); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5503, House Report 102-901, pages 28-30):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Birmingham Heritage Corridor, AL..........................      $250,000
Horseshoe Curve NHL, PA...................................      $250,000
National Constitution Center, PA..........................      $250,000
Native Hawaiian Culture and Arts Program, HI..............    $2,000,000
Wheeling National Heritage Area, WV.......................    $2,324,000
William Douglas Outdoor Education Center, CA..............      $250,000
August Canal NHL, GA......................................       $75,000
Botto House, American Labor Museum, NJ....................      $140,000
Kershaw House, SC.........................................      $125,000
Lincoln Center, IL........................................    $1,700,000
Walk on the Mountain, WA..................................    $2,000,000
Mimbres NM, NM............................................      $150,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 502. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        construction projects; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-381; 106 Stat. 1379-
        1380); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5503, House Report 102-901, pages 23-26):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appropriate technology transfer for rural areas...........    $1,300,000
Forensics Laboratory, OR..................................      $195,000
Lake Champlain activities.................................      $500,000
Biodiversity initiative, University of Nevada-Reno, NV....    $1,050,000
Patuxent (Maintenance)....................................      $100,000
Leetown (environmental and handicapped fishing complex)...       $75,000
Co-op unit vacancies......................................       $73,000
Audubon Species Institute, LA.............................    $8,672,000
Bowerman Basin NWR, WA....................................      $500,000
California Condor breeding facility, CA...................      $400,000
Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge, LA..............    $2,900,000
Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge, OR..................      $600,000
Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, VA.................      $400,000
Coquille Point National Wildlife Refuge, OR...............      $400,000
Craig Brook NFH, ME.......................................      $400,000
DC Booth Hatchery, SD.....................................    $1,250,000
Dexter National Fish Hatcher, NM..........................    $1,428,000
Hakalau National Wildlife Refuge, HI......................      $300,000
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, AK........................    $2,500,000
Las Vegas National Wildlife Refuge, NM....................    $2,000,000
National Education and Training Center, WV................   $15,000,000
Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge, OH.......................    $2,700,000
Pacific Institute of Natural Sciences, OR.................    $1,700,000
Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, MD.....................      $626,000
Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge, OK...................      $450,000
Wichita Environmental Education Center, KA................    $2,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 503. NATIONAL FOREST SERVICE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        projects of the National Forest Service; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-381; 106 Stat. 1397-
        1399); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5503, House Report 102-901, pages 47-55):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Termiticides at Gulfport, MS..............................      $120,000
Blue Mountains Institute at LaGrande, OR..................      $100,000
Hardwoods ecology at Asheville, NC........................      $200,000
Integrated forest management center, AR...................      $200,000
Global change at Raleigh, NC..............................       $72,000
Southwestern forestry, Fort Collins, CO...................      $300,000
Timber and Watershed at Honolulu, HI......................      $100,000
Genetics at Rhinelander, WI...............................       $65,000
Management Practices at Parsons, WV.......................       $60,000
Timber bridges for West Virginia University, WV...........      $200,000
Tannins at Pineville, LA..................................      $100,000
Columbia Gorge economic development grants................      $750,000
Fire protection for Burton/Santini lots at Lake Tahoe.....      $200,000
Ohio Harbor tree planting, OH.............................      $500,000
Urban Forestry:...........................................              
  Chicago, IL.............................................    $1,000,000
  Ohio Arbor, OH..........................................      $500,000
  Tacoma, WA..............................................      $100,000
  Bremerton, WA...........................................       $50,000
  Port Orchard, WA........................................       $50,000
  Atlanta, GA.............................................      $500,000
  Northern New Jersey, NJ.................................      $500,000
Chesapeake Bay forest management..........................      $150,000
Center for Semi-Arid Agroforestry.........................      $200,000
Aerial Fire Depot, Missoula, MT...........................      $600,000
Ranger District Office, Helena, MT........................      $650,000
Ranger District Office, Androscoggin, NH..................    $1,350,000
Winding Stair NRA, OK.....................................    $1,100,000
Oconee National Forest....................................    $1,000,000
Southeast Alaska Visitors Center..........................    $2,500,000
Toiyabe National Forest (Kyle Station)....................      $100,000
Monongahela National Forest...............................      $911,000
Timberline Lodge..........................................      $771,000
Multnomah Falls...........................................      $250,000
Green Mountain National Forest............................      $375,000
Kisatchie National Forest storm damage....................      $350,000
White Mountain National Forest............................      $350,000
Timber roads in Dixie National Forest.....................    $8,500,000
Recreation roads in Dixie National Forest.................      $250,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                TITLE VI--TRANSPORTATION APPROPRIATIONS

SEC. 601. AIRWAY SCIENCE GRANTS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the airway science program; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-388; 106 Stat. 1525-
        1526); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5518, House Report 102-924, page 32):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Middle Tennessee State University.........................      $556,000
Embry-Ridele University (FL, AL)..........................   $11,500,000
Henderson State University (AR)...........................    $2,235,000
University of Alaska......................................    $6,884,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 602. HIGHWAY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        highway research, development, and technology; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-388; 106 Stat. 1527); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5518, House Report 102-924, page 34):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
University of California (San Diego) research on the use                
 of composite materials in construction...................    $1,600,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 603. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        construction and maintenance of Federal-Aid Highways; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-388; 106 Stat. 1529-
        1531); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5518, House Report 102-924, pages 38-40):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highway Safety and Economic Development Demonstration (MS)    $6,400,000
Climbing Lane and Highway Safety Demonstration (PA).......    $3,840,000
Kentucky Bridge Demonstration Project.....................    $6,400,000
Virginia HOV Safety Demonstration Project.................    $1,600,000
Bicycle Transportation Demonstration Project (MI).........      $304,000
Pennsylvania Reconstruction Demonstration Project.........    $6,400,000
Pennsylvania Toll Road Demonstration Project..............    $3,200,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 604. FEDERAL HIGHWAY DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        Federal Highway Administration demonstration projects; and
            (2) the demonstration projects were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-388; 106 Stat. 1531); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following amounts provided for Federal 
Highway Administration studies (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 
5518, House Report 102-924, pages 40-41):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appalachian corridors:....................................              
  New York: Corridor ``T''................................   $16,000,000
  West Virginia:..........................................              
    Corridor ``G'' or ``H''...............................   $80,000,000
    Corridor ``L''........................................   $24,000,000
Sky Harbor Airport Access Road, AZ........................    $6,000,000
Lock and Dam No. 4 Road (Pine Bluff, AR)..................    $6,400,000
Highway 156 Bypass (Hollister), CA........................      $960,000
Access Road to Ontario International Airport, CA..........    $3,200,000
Florida: Northeast Dade Bikepaths:........................              
  City of North Miami.....................................      $400,000
  City of North Miami Beach...............................      $400,000
Florida U.S. 27 (Palm Beach County).......................    $1,760,000
Biscayne Boulevard/U.S. 1 Connect Port/Miami to I-395, FL.    $2,400,000
17th Street tunnel project (Fort Lauderdale)..............    $4,912,000
Lake Lanier Access Project, GA............................    $2,624,000
Kihei-Haleakal Highway, HI................................    $4,000,000
Saddle Road, Island of Hawaii, HI.........................      $960,000
U.S. 63 from Waterloo to Minnesota State Border, IA.......    $3,520,000
5th Street to 6th Street, Waterloo, IA....................    $2,000,000
Des Moines to Burlington Connector, IA....................    $8,000,000
I-65 and State Rt 46 Interchange Project (Columbus), IN...    $6,400,000
Muncie State Road 67 (I-69 to Muncie Bypass), IN..........    $4,992,000
U.S. 54/Kellogg Freeway, KS...............................    $6,160,000
Woodrow Wilson Bridge, MD.................................    $5,000,000
M-84 Bay Road -- Saginaw and Bay Counties, MI.............      $100,000
Grand Rapids I-96 Bypass, MI..............................      $768,000
Bristol Road Relocation Project (Flint and Genesse                      
 Counties), MI............................................    $1,440,000
U.S. 31 (City of Niles and City of Benton Harbor), MI.....      $320,000
Maple Road Extension, Walled Lake, MI.....................    $2,000,000
Multi-Modal Transportation Center, St. Louis, MO..........      $640,000
I-90 Interchange, Belgrade, MT............................    $2,000,000
U.S. 64 (East of Jordan Lake to U.S.-64/U.S.-1 Interchange              
 in Cary), NC.............................................    $4,640,000
Newcastle Verrillion Bridge, SD...........................    $3,296,000
Route 21 widening -- RR/Highway Bridge ``NJ Transit                     
 Bridge'' (Newark), NJ....................................    $1,200,000
I-280 Down Connector (including acquisition for First                   
 Street Ramp), NJ.........................................    $1,504,000
Route 21 Viaduct Advanced Property Acquisition............    $2,880,000
Airport Access from I-25 (Albuqerque) Sunport Boulevard,                
 NM.......................................................    $4,400,000
I-15 Sahara Avenue Interchange (Las Vegas), NV............   $11,460,000
U.S. 395 Extension from South Virginia to Mt. Rose Highway    $2,700,000
I-15 Spring Mountain Interchange (Las Vegas), NV..........    $6,000,000
Design Improvements on Miller Highway (New York City), NY.    $1,696,000
Exit 26 Bridge (Mohawk River Valley) (Schenectady County),              
 NY.......................................................    $1,280,000
Pond Creek Road, Grant County, OK.........................    $3,360,000
Donora Industrial Park Access Road (Donora--Monessen                    
 Bridge/I-70), PA.........................................      $640,000
U.S. Route 6 Bypass/widening (Wysox, Towanda and                        
 Tunkhannock Boroughs), PA................................    $1,280,000
U.S. 202 between King of Prussia and Montgomeryville, PA..    $1,440,000
I-81 (vicinity of Wilkes-Barre) (Exits 43-46 corridor                   
 project), PA.............................................    $2,880,000
SR 56 Rehabilitation, PA..................................    $9,600,000
Walnut Street/Bluff Furnace Park (Chattanooga), TN........      $320,000
U.S.-Mexico Border Highway (Loop 375) (El Paso), TX.......    $1,600,000
U.S. Route 89 between Farmington and Ogden, UT............    $2,400,000
I-15/University Interchange, Provo, UT....................    $4,240,000
Christiansted Bypass (St. Croix), VI......................      $544,000
Snohomish County HOV (Evert and Seattle)/park-n-ride                    
 projects (Lynwood), WA...................................      $320,000
State Route 509, East-West Corridor project (Port of                    
 Tacoma), WA..............................................    $1,520,000
Scenic Byways Project: U.S. 101 (WA, OR, CA)..............    $4,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 605. TRANSIT PLANNING AND RESEARCH.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        transit planning and research; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-388; 106 Stat. 1536-
        1537); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5518, House Report 102-924, page 49):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida International University and University of South                
 Florida..................................................    $3,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

      TITLE VII--TREASURY, POSTAL SERVICE, AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT 
                             APPROPRIATIONS

SEC. 701. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        design and construction grants funded through the Federal 
        Buildings Fund, under the jurisdiction of the General Services 
        Administration; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-393; 106 Stat. 1744-
        1745); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5488, House Report 102-919, pages 6-7 and 51-53):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction of a new parking facility in Newark, New                   
 Jersey...................................................    $9,000,000
Expansion of the Scranton, Pennsylvania Mail Facility.....    $3,000,000
Centers for Disease Control, site, acquisition, and                     
 improvements in Atlanta, Georgia.........................   $26,000,000
For construction of a Center of Disease Control laboratory              
 in Atlanta, Georgia......................................   $30,000,000
For construction of a Center of Disease Control campus in               
 Atlanta, Georgia.........................................   $15,000,000
For construction of a new United States Courthouse                      
 facility in Brooklyn, New York...........................   $15,000,000
For a Courthouse in Albany, Georgia.......................    $6,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 702. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        the establishment of health promotion and disease prevention 
        programs for Federal employees; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government 
        Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102-393; 106 Stat. 1754-
        1755); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5488, House Report 102-919, page 59):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expanded efforts for health promotion for federal                       
 employees................................................    $1,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

   TITLE VIII--VETERANS AFFAIRS, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND 
                  INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS

               Subtitle A--Department of Veterans Affairs

SEC. 801. CONSTRUCTION GRANTS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        construction grants; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1576); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902, page 14):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relocation of the regional office in Jackson, MS..........   $16,300,000
Planning and design of a joint project with the College of              
 Medicine for the relocation of medical school functions                
 and renovation of buildings 2, 3, and 5 at the Mountain                
 Home, TN, VA Medical Center..............................    $2,800,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


                    Subtitle B--Independent Agencies

SEC. 811. EPA--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        research and development; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1596); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902, pages 41-43):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adirondack Destruction Assessment Program.................      $500,000
Center for Environmental Management.......................    $3,200,000
National Academy of Sciences study of wetlands............      $400,000
American Water Works Association Research Foundation......      $575,000
Southeast Environmental Research Center...................    $2,000,000
Center for Excellence in Polymer Research and                           
 Environmental Study......................................    $1,200,000
Nutrient loading research project in Boston Harbor and                  
 Massachusetts Bay. These funds should be allocated to the              
 Naragansett Laboratory...................................      $400,000
Interagency coordination of Great Lakes...................      $125,000
Water Environment Research Foundation.....................      $700,000
Energy and Environmental Research Center at the University              
 of North Dakota for a cradle-to-grave assessment and                   
 control technology development program for toxic metal                 
 emissions................................................    $1,600,000
Recycling and reuse technology development project at the               
 Iowa Waste Reduction Center..............................      $700,000
Urban waste management research at the University of New                
 Orleans..................................................      $700,000
National ultraviolet monitoring center, a national program              
 to monitor the ultraviolet flux reaching the Earth's                   
 surface. The monitoring center is to be established at                 
 the University of Georgia, Athens, GA....................      $700,000
Pollution prevention research and development center at                 
 the University of Connecticut............................    $1,450,000
Center for Analysis of Environmental Change to provide                  
 comprehensive approaches needed for wise management of                 
 the Columbia and Snake Rivers ecosystem resources........      $250,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 812. EPA--ABATEMENT, CONTROL, AND COMPLIANCE.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        abatement, control, and compliance; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1596-1597); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902, pages 44-47):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative fuels demonstration project in the South Coast              
 Air Quality Management District..........................      $600,000
National Rural Water Association..........................    $3,300,000
NRWA's groundwater protection program.....................    $1,000,000
Indian multimedia grants..................................    $1,000,000
National High Altitude Center.............................      $350,000
Documentary of the Hudson River Highlands.................      $210,000
Tar-Pamlico River Basin nonpoint source demonstration and               
 watershed pilot program..................................      $350,000
EPA's environmental statistics initiative.................      $750,000
Cleanup of contaminated sediments in the Buffalo River....      $800,000
Continued work on the Maumee River and Bay basinwide                    
 assessment of hazardous waste sites......................    $1,250,000
Saginaw River Watershed...................................    $1,000,000
Underground injection control program.....................      $200,000
Continued work on the Spokane aquifer.....................    $1,000,000
EPA's Region V Lake/Watershed management plan.............      $850,000
Wetlands mitigation bank prototype in Warrenton, OR.......      $150,000
Wetlands demonstration project on the Susquehanna River in              
 Northeastern Pennsylvania................................      $700,000
Wetlands study of the McKenzie River Basin................      $600,000
Conduct a groundwater study of the Calumet Lake Region....      $200,000
Hayward Marsh Wetlands restoration........................      $750,000
Innovative and alternative wastewater treatment                         
 demonstration project in the Florida Keys................      $500,000
Methane Energy and Agriculture Development Program........      $750,000
Pilot project on microsale chemistry techniques to support              
 innovative research in pollution prevention..............      $250,000
Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization for              
 additional training for minority and women contractors...       $50,000
Canaan Valley, West Virginia, wetlands complex............      $250,000
Diary pollution research..................................      $550,000
Lake water quality activities by the State of New Jersey,               
 including activities at Strawbridge Lake, and continuing               
 work at Lake Musconetcong and Alcyon Lake, or other lakes              
 the State deems appropriate. This sum should be in                     
 addition to, and not in lieu of, any other Federal                     
 assistance...............................................      $550,000
St. Croix River International Waterway Commission.........      $100,000
Oyster reseeding in the Chesapeake Bay....................    $1,000,000
Lake Pontchartrain water quality improvements.............    $3,800,000
Northwest Indian tribes for coordinated and cooperative                 
 environmental protection approaches......................    $2,500,000
Multimedia project funding to be utilized by the Inter                  
 Tribal Council of Arizona to continue to meet solid waste              
 needs assessment and planning requirements of the Arizona              
 tribes...................................................    $1,000,000
High Altitude In-Use Compliance Center....................      $200,000
National demonstration project of onsite wastewater                     
 treatment technologies and management systems............    $1,500,000
Small Towns Environment Program to aid small communities                
 in new approaches to design and construct water and                    
 wastewater systems.......................................      $700,000
Small business pollution prevention demonstraiton program               
 in New Jersey............................................      $450,000
Investigate the causes and develop potential solutions to               
 the algal bloom crisis in West Maui......................      $400,000
Continuation of a nonpoint source pollution study in                    
 Nebraska, Iowa, and Kansas to study the origins and                    
 migrations of nonpoint source pollution, using advanced                
 land-imaging techniques..................................    $1,500,000
Restore Decker Lake in West Valley City, UT...............    $1,000,000
Cleanup of Black Hawk Lake near Wall Lake, IA.............      $400,000
Integrated pollution prevention initiative at the New                   
 Jersey Institute of Technology...........................    $2,000,000
Northeast States for coordinated air use management for                 
 interstate pollution control and ozone reduction.........      $300,000
Association of State and Interstate Water Pollution                     
 Control Administrators (conference)......................      $400,000
Grand River Basin nonpoint source pollution program.......      $400,000
Consortium for International Earth Science Information                  
 Network (CIESIN) (conference)............................    $4,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 813. EPA--BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        buildings and facilities; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1598-1599); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902, pages 51-55):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Environmental Health Science Research Center at Columbia                
 University...............................................   $10,000,000
Grant for the Christopher Columbus Center of Marine                     
 Research and Exploration.................................   $12,500,000
Grant for the Maine Quarternary Studies Institute.........    $1,000,000
Grant to the University of Utah for an Intermountain                    
 Regional Network and Scientific Computation Center.......    $5,000,000
For a research program in cooperation with the Association              
 of Minority Health Professions Schools...................    $4,000,000
For a study of human health impacts of contaminated fish..    $3,000,000
For chemical sensitivity/low level chemical and                         
 environmental exposure workshops.........................      $250,000
For a PCB exposure study in Monroe County, IN.............      $250,000
For the Lipari information network........................       $50,000
For NIEHS worker training grants..........................   $20,000,000
For NIEHS basic research grants...........................   $20,000,000
For the Gulf Coast Hazardous Substance Research Center....    $2,500,000
For Clark Atlanta University Hazardous Substance Research               
 Center...................................................    $3,000,000
For the SITE program to develop the Mine Waste Pilot                    
 Program..................................................    $2,500,000
For a grant to the Ocean County Utilities Authority, in                 
 the State of New Jersey, for necessary modifications and               
 replacements to the Carver-Greenfield sewage treatment                 
 plant....................................................   $19,000,000
For a grant for necessary work to remove and reroute                    
 existing sewer lines at the Centennial Olympic site in                 
 the City of Atlanta, GA..................................    $7,000,000
For a grant to the State of Arizona for an interceptor/                 
 collection system in the City of Avondale, AZ............   $10,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


SEC. 814. OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        activities associated with CIESIN; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1604); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902, page 60):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For activities associated with the Consortium for                       
 International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).    $2,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 815. NASA--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        research and development; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1608-1609); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902, pages 66-71):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Consortium for International Earth Science                      
 Information Network (CIESIN).............................   $20,000,000
For the National Technology Transfer Center, Wheeling                   
 Jesuit College, Wheeling, WV.............................    $4,400,000
For AdaNet................................................    $2,100,000
For the Nebraska Department of Education to expand the                  
 NASA Teacher Resource Center at the University of                      
 Nebraska at Lincoln......................................      $400,000
For the Classroom of the Future, WV.......................    $2,800,000
For the Oregon system of higher education for computer                  
 network infrastructure for advanced technology research                
 and education projects...................................    $4,500,000
For distance learning activities at the Marine Science                  
 Center at Oregon State University........................      $500,000
For the University of Utah Intermountain Network and                    
 Scientific Computation Center............................   $10,000,000
For expansion of the capacity for informal science                      
 education activities at the Cosmosphere at Hutchinson,                 
 Kansas...................................................    $4,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 816. NASA--CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set aside for 
        construction of facilities; and
            (2) the amounts were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (C) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1609); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902, page 70):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a Consortium for International Earth Science                        
 International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)               
 facility.................................................   $42,000,000
For constructing, equipping, and furnishing the Delta                   
 College science learning center and planetarium..........    $8,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Subtitle C--Department of Housing and Urban Development

SEC. 821. SPECIAL PURPOSE GRANTS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) the grants listed in subsection (c) are ``Special 
        Purpose Grants'' funded under Annual Contributions for Assisted 
        Housing;
            (2) until the enactment of the Department of Housing and 
        Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1701q-1), 
        Special Purpose Grants were funded by the Secretary of Housing 
        and Urban Development's discretionary fund under section 107 of 
        the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
        5307);
            (3) the Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform 
        Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1701q-1) eliminated the use of the 
        Secretary's discretionary fund for Special Purpose Grants;
            (4) Congress continues to fund Special Purpose Grants 
        through Annual Contributions to Assisted Housing, in violation 
        of the spirit of the Department of Housing and Urban 
        Development Reform Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1701q-1); and
            (5) the grants listed in subsection (c) were--
                    (A) not authorized;
                    (B) not the subject of congressional committee or 
                subcommittee authorization hearings;
                    (C) not awarded on a competitive basis; and
                    (D) first added by the Committee of Conference, in 
                the case of the item listed in subsection (c) relating 
                to economic development in the county of Arostook, 
                Maine, and the city of Presque Isle, Maine, and all 
                subsequent items.
    (b) Rescission.--There are rescinded--
            (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which were set 
        aside or otherwise made available out of appropriations made by 
        the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
        Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 
        (Pub. L. 102-389; 106 Stat. 1571); and
            (2) the underlying appropriations for the amounts.
    (c) Amounts.--Except to the extent obligated, the amounts rescinded 
by subsection (b) are the following (Conference Report to accompany 
H.R. 5679, House Report 102-902):


------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Amount of 
              Program, project, or activity:                 rescission:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tacoma, WA job opportunity and neighborhood revitalization              
 project..................................................    $1,500,000
Seattle community action capitol project for social                     
 services and working capital to assist four areas in                   
 Seattle, WA..............................................    $1,350,000
North East Community Center Association in Spokane, WA....      $150,000
City of Santa Fe, NM for infrastructure development                     
 connected with the Tierra Contenta Affordable Housing                  
 program..................................................    $1,500,000
Facility for the Roadrunner Food Bank in Albuquerque, NM..    $1,000,000
Wayne Miner homeownership project in Kansas City, MO......    $1,700,000
Multi-purpose social services center for at-risk children,              
 youth and adults in Springfield, MO......................      $300,000
Water tower for the Joplin Industrial Park in Joplin, MO..      $250,000
Expansion of the Swope Parkway Health Center in Kansas                  
 City, MO.................................................    $3,000,000
Day care center for low-income residents at the Wherry                  
 complex in Pine Lawn, MO.................................      $450,000
To the city of Tulsa, OK for the Kendall-Whittier                       
 neighborhood demonstration program.......................      $750,000
To the city of Oklahoma City, OK for infrastructure needs               
 in conjunction with the Oklahoma School of Science and                 
 Mathematics..............................................    $2,750,000
City of Enid, OK for providing educational opportunities                
 through the Enid Economic Development Authority..........      $500,000
Continued rehabilitation of the Windsor Park neighborhood               
 in North Las Vegas, Nevada...............................    $1,000,000
Economic development and natural resources infrastructure               
 repair along the Atlantic coast of New Jersey............    $1,000,000
Lead-paint demonstration project in the City of Newark,                 
 New Jersey...............................................    $1,500,000
Arkansas Enterprise Group to create a wood products                     
 modernization and market development fund................      $250,000
Community-based health insurance program in two rural                   
 communities in the Mississippi River delta region of                   
 Arkansas.................................................    $1,000,000
Manufacturing incubator facility in North Dakota to                     
 develop emerging technologies that generate business in                
 rural areas..............................................    $1,500,000
Infrastructure improvements in low-income housing in Grand              
 Forks, ND................................................    $1,000,000
Construction of a new public health facility in Merced                  
 County, CA...............................................    $1,000,000
Infrastructure demolition and repair in Richardson Bay in               
 the Marin County, California area........................    $2,500,000
Creation of business outreach centers sponsored by the                  
 Council of Jewish Organizations in New York..............    $1,000,000
Acquisition and renovation of two facilities that serve                 
 developmentally disabled children to be run by the Hebrew              
 Academy for Special Children in New York.................    $2,000,000
Expansion of non-profit neighborhood social service                     
 centers run by the Greater Rochester Foundation in                     
 Rochester, NY............................................    $2,000,000
Low-income housing in the Village of Kaiser, NY...........      $500,000
Erie County Industrial Development Agency for an advanced               
 training center in Erie County, NY.......................      $500,000
Renovation of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at the                  
 Children's Hospital of Buffalo, NY.......................    $2,000,000
Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., an Arizona state non-profit                
 organization, for a new housing initiative to leverage                 
 the purchase of RTC properties and to provide technical                
 assistance to other non-profit groups to participate in                
 this program.............................................      $300,000
Bethel New Life, Inc. in Chicago, IL for adapting a                     
 hospital complex into a facility that provides housing,                
 health care and community social services to a distressed              
 area of Chicago..........................................      $250,000
Children's health care project in Hartford, CT............    $2,000,000
Old State House project in Hartford, CT...................    $3,000,000
Infrastructure improvements in the Planeview area of                    
 Wichita, Kansas..........................................    $1,200,000
City of Topeka, KS to acquire and renovate an abandoned                 
 facility as a law enforcement facility...................    $1,000,000
Cypress Drug and Alcohol Recovery program in Olathe, KS...      $250,000
Wichita Children's Home in Wichita, KS....................      $500,000
Job training and placement activities for disadvantaged                 
 and underrepresented youth at the America-First Printing               
 Center in Atlanta, GA....................................      $250,000
Restoration of the Liberty Theater in Columbus, GA in                   
 conjunction with the city's 5th and 6th Avenue Area                    
 Redevelopment Plan.......................................    $1,000,000
Restoration of the Lucas Theater in Savannah, Georgia's                 
 historic district, as part of the city's urban                         
 revitalization plan......................................    $1,000,000
King Center in Atlanta, GA for activities to combat                     
 poverty, racism and violence, including technical                      
 assistance, direct grants and community capacity-building              
 activities...............................................    $2,100,000
Land acquisition by the city of Vienna, GA in conjunction               
 with an economic development project that involves a new               
 poultry processing facility..............................      $900,000
River Park Residential Development project in Salt Lake                 
 City, UT.................................................    $2,200,000
Creation of a West Salt Lake City Affordable Housing                    
 Enhancement fund in Salt Lake City, UT...................    $1,700,000
Utah Technology Finance Corporation.......................      $500,000
Utah Fund for Rural Development...........................      $250,000
Provo City, UT and Utah County, UT women and children                   
 shelter for transitional housing for abused spouses and                
 their children...........................................      $500,000
Provo City, UT and Utah County, UT Franklin neighborhood                
 preservation and homeownership program...................      $350,000
Midvale City Housing and Economic Development agency for                
 activities connected with the Sharon Steel superfund site              
 in Midvale, UT...........................................      $350,000
Housing rehabilitation and revitalization in Ogden, UT....      $800,000
To the City of Cleveland to implement the plan of the                   
 Cleveland Foundation's Commission on Poverty to combat                 
 persistent poverty.......................................    $1,500,000
Infrastructure to connect the Alliance Community Hospital               
 and an on-site nursing home in Alliance, OH..............    $1,250,000
Individual home acquisition program run by the Iowa                     
 Finance Authority........................................    $1,500,000
Neighborhood improvement in the Hilltop section of                      
 Davenport, IA............................................    $1,000,000
Dismantling, environmental cleanup and upgrading of the                 
 Gra-Iron Foundry in Marshalltown, IA.....................      $200,000
Battered Persons Advocacy project in Roseburg, OR.........      $100,000
Job training for displaced timber workers and fishermen in              
 Oregon...................................................    $2,500,000
Approximately 89 units of single-room occupancy housing to              
 help with displacement of individuals resulting from the               
 construction of a federal courthouse in Portland, OR.....    $2,200,000
Water, sewer, housing rehabilitation and community                      
 improvements in the Arthurtown, Taylors, and Little                    
 Camden Communities in Richland County, SC................    $3,000,000
Day care and head start facilities in conjunction with an               
 affordable housing project in Beaufort County, SC........      $500,000
Improvement of existing social service and public health                
 facilities in Fairfield County, SC.......................    $1,000,000
Continued infrastructure development in the Hawaiian Home               
 Lands....................................................    $1,200,000
Continued assistance to two sugarcane mills on Hilo-                    
 Hamakua Coast of Hawaii..................................    $1,300,000
New affordable housing initiatives in Hawaii, including a               
 women's shelter in the Maui County, additional housing                 
 initiatives in Kauai County, and site acquisition and                  
 development for use as assisted housing development run                
 by non-profit groups in the City and County of Honolulu..    $2,900,000
Small business loan project run by the City of New                      
 Orleans, LA..............................................      $250,000
Housing and comprehensive services for homeless women and               
 their families at the ``My House'' project in New                      
 Orleans, LA..............................................      $350,000
Continuation of activities in the City of New Orleans, LA               
 to provide job training, education, and functional skills              
 to at risk residents of public housing, in conjunction                 
 with Loyola University...................................    $5,000,000
Project Hope in Milwaukee, WI for low-income homeownership              
 counseling and drug education activities.................      $750,000
Wisconsin small business development center...............    $1,000,000
University/neighborhood crime intervention demonstration                
 program at Milwaukee, WI.................................      $650,000
Regional demonstration center for advanced care for the                 
 elderly at the New England Deaconness Hospital in Boston,              
 MA.......................................................    $5,000,000
Expansion of the Gateway project at the Omaha Nebraska                  
 Housing Authority in Omaha, NE...........................      $600,000
Mercade Economic Development Project in South Omaha, NE...      $200,000
Renovation and equipment for the expansion of the rural                 
 health education network in Kearney, NE..................      $900,000
Expansion of the Panhandle Community Health Center in                   
 Scottsbluff, NE..........................................      $900,000
Cathedral Health Care System's Women's and Children's                   
 Service Network for construction, renovation, site work                
 and medical equipment in Newark, NJ......................    $4,500,000
New Jersey Institute of Technology to continue the test of              
 affordable housing technologies..........................      $300,000
Development of an outdoor learning facility for disabled                
 children in Willingsboro, NJ.............................      $150,000
Renovation of three senior centers in Atlantic County, NJ.      $300,000
Comprehensive economic development activities in Penns                  
 Grove, NJ................................................      $400,000
Hammonton Revitalization Corporation of Hammonton, NJ to                
 revitalize Hammonton's central business district.........      $400,000
Site clearance and design work on the Newark/University                 
 Heights Science Park in Newark, NJ.......................    $1,500,000
Economic revitalization and infrastructure repair in the                
 following Vermont communities: Montpelier, $1,250,000;                 
 Randolph, $1,000,000; and Hardwick, $750,000.............    $3,000,000
Vermont Housing and Conservation Board to assist in                     
 constructing or rehabilitating up to seven affordable                  
 housing projects located in up to six Vermont communities    $2,000,000
Five following existing economic development revolving                  
 loan funds in Vermont, for loan activity for start up,                 
 expansion and improvement of small business development,               
 to be divided evenly among the five funds in $300,000                  
 increments: the Vermont Job Start Program; the Transition              
 Fund of the Economic Development Council of Northern                   
 Vermont; the Small Entrepreneurial Loan Fund of the                    
 Northern Community Investment Corporation; the Town of                 
 Hartford Business Revolving Loan Fund; and the Town of                 
 Bennington Revolving Loan Fund...........................    $1,500,000
Renovation of the Eddystone Center as a center for                      
 homeless veterans in Detroit, MI.........................    $1,800,000
Infrastructure improvements for the City of Albion, MI....      $900,000
Community stabilization and revitalization project in                   
 Flint, MI................................................      $800,000
Health care and social service facility for the citizens                
 of central Mississippi and the Mississippi Delta region..    $6,000,000
To the Kentucky Highlands Investment Corporation for                    
 economic development activities in McCeary County, KY....      $200,000
To the Mountain Association for Community Economic                      
 Development for the development of flexible manufacturing              
 networks in eastern Kentucky.............................      $250,000
Development of a technology-based business information                  
 center in Manchester, NH.................................    $1,000,000
Program planning and development of a model community-                  
 based rural health network headquartered at the Carolinas              
 Medical Center in Charlotte, NC..........................    $3,000,000
Expansion of Uplift, Inc. and for the development of                    
 statewide activities and services for at-risk children                 
 and families in North Carolina...........................      $300,000
Activities of the Eastern North Carolina Poverty Committee              
 to expand affordable housing opportunities for rural                   
 residents of Eastern North Carolina......................      $200,000
Construction of a regional fire training center and                     
 related equipment in Clinton, TN.........................    $1,000,000
Renovation and development of the Lehigh Park community                 
 service center in Philadelphia, PA.......................    $1,000,000
To provide grants and technical assistance to community                 
 development corporations through the Philadelphia                      
 Development Partnerships to develop affordable housing in              
 Philadelphia, PA.........................................      $500,000
To Genesis II, Inc., in Philadelphia, PA for renovation of              
 a residential drug treatment facility....................      $750,000
Community facilities in Nanty Glo, PA.....................       $75,000
Community facilities in Garrett, PA.......................       $50,000
Construction of a child development center in Buckhannon,               
 WV.......................................................    $3,200,000
Continued renovation of an abandoned building to convert                
 into an economic development and training facility in                  
 Elkins, WV...............................................      $700,000
An addition to a local fire and emergency rescue facility               
 in McDowell County, WV...................................      $100,000
Development of an integrated community center and health                
 clinic through the use of an abandoned facility in                     
 Shepherdstown, WV........................................      $500,000
Construction of an ambulatory care center and health                    
 science library in Hinington, WV.........................    $4,500,000
Construction of a science and technology facility to                    
 provide training, advanced technology, and electronic                  
 computational capability in Shepherdstown, WV............    $4,000,000
To complete construction of the Mid-Atlantic Aviation and               
 Training Center near Clarksburg, WV......................    $1,800,000
Construction of a facility for the Mountaineer Food Bank                
 in Gassaway, WV..........................................      $950,000
Thunder Child Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Center              
 near Sheridan, WY........................................    $1,000,000
To the Community Enterprise Development Corporation of                  
 Alaska to promote economic development in Alaska Native                
 villages through the development and marketing of native               
 prototype products and their production components.......      $350,000
Downtown economic development activities in Sioux Falls,                
 SD.......................................................      $100,000
Economic development project, including environmental                   
 cleanup, pollution abatement, and job retention and                    
 creation activities, in the county of Arostook, ME and                 
 the city of Presque Isle, ME.............................    $2,275,000
To continue the Neighborhood Development Demonstration....    $2,000,000
To Lowell, MA, to demolish and/or rehabilitate abandoned                
 properties to combat arson, gangs, and drugs.............    $1,000,000
To Lawrence, MA, to demolish and/or rehabilitate abandoned              
 properties to combat arson, gangs, and drugs; and for                  
 computer hardware for City hall to assess arson damage...    $1,200,000
To Methuen, MA, for public safety equipment and to                      
 purchase and rehabilitate vacant property for use as a                 
 human services center....................................      $650,000
To relocate, renovate and expand the Middlesex Shelter                  
 homeless facility in Lowell, Massachusetts...............      $650,000
To Oregon City, Oregon, for an economic development                     
 project, including site acquisition, wetlands                          
 restoration, and final design and planning for a western               
 frontier-Oregon Territory historical center..............    $3,000,000
Restoration and renovation of the Lamar and Pickens                     
 County, Alabama, courthouses.............................    $1,500,000
Freedom Ranch in Blount County, Alabama, to provide                     
 housing for homeless and abused children.................      $500,000
To Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to establish the Institute               
 for the Advancement of Mathematics and Science Teaching..    $2,500,000
To the Philadelphia (PA) Regional Port Authority for                    
 revitalization of the Tioga Marine Terminal..............    $1,000,000
Southwest Development Financing, Inc. to capitalize a                   
 revolving loan fund to encourage economic development and              
 tourism in Southwest Virginia............................    $1,000,000
To the Ark-Tex Council of Governments, located in Bowie                 
 County, TX, for infrastructure, community or economic                  
 development activities...................................    $1,500,000
To the East Texas Council of Governments, located in                    
 Kilgore, TX, for infrastructure, community or economic                 
 development activities in Wood, Camp, Gregg, Harrison,                 
 Marion, Rusk, Upshur, or Panola counties.................      $500,000
Child development center and social service facility in                 
 Longview, TX.............................................      $400,000
Expansion, equipment and infrastructure associated with                 
 the Rusk County Exposition Center in Rusk County, TX.....      $250,000
To the Upshur County Civic Improvement Foundation, located              
 in Upshur County, TX, for community development                        
 activities...............................................      $850,000
Renovation of an industrial building for Focus: HOPE                    
 Center for Advanced Technologies in Detroit, MI..........    $2,900,000
Central Norristown redevelopment project in PA............      $400,000
To the City of Mackinac Island, MI, to restore historic                 
 buildings and for other municipal purposes...............    $1,900,000
Establishment of a Wellness Institute by Marquette General              
 Hospital, in Marquette, MI...............................      $480,000
To Enterprise Development, Inc. of Columbia, SC, for a                  
 video conferencing and training facility.................    $1,500,000
To the Bay County Building Authority in Bay County, MI,                 
 for a conference center and for other municipal purposes.    $5,900,000
Housing rehabilitation and for creating employment                      
 opportunities in the Eastside Neighborhood in Tacoma, WA.      $500,000
To Los Angeles, CA, for the East Los Angeles Community                  
 Union for commercial redevelopment activities............    $1,750,000
To Los Angeles, CA, for a loan fund to be administered by               
 a nonprofit community organization in support of small                 
 business revitalization that will create a beneficial                  
 impact on employment, income, savings, and the                         
 development of a stronger community economic base in                   
 South Central Los Angeles................................    $1,750,000
To the City of San Jose, CA, for the Mexican Heritage                   
 Plaza and Gardens project................................    $1,000,000
To develop a business incubator program in the Rio Linda/               
 North Highlands area of California, to provide job                     
 training and start-up business assistance to low-income                
 residents in those areas.................................      $500,000
Dixon, CA, sewer plant expansion to bring the sewage                    
 treatment facility into compliance, which will help                    
 reduce housing costs for low and moderate income families      $500,000
To West Sacramento, CA, for the Margaret McDowell Senior                
 Center project...........................................      $500,000
Washington State University Affordable Housing program....      $200,000
Handicapped access project at the Spokane Marketplace in                
 Spokane, WA..............................................      $200,000
To Agri-Technics International, of Pullman, WA, for rural               
 economic development activities..........................      $150,000
Handicapped access projects in three rural areas: $84,000               
 at Preston Hall, Waitsburg, WA; $7,000 for City Hall,                  
 Starbuck, WA; and $30,000 for the North County (Cutter)                
 Theater, Metaline Falls, WA..............................      $121,000
Walla Walla Small Business Center program in Walla Walla                
 County, WA...............................................       $77,000
Spokane (WA) Food Bank to purchase a warehouse............      $500,000
Migrant farmerworkers' housing in Hillsborough County, FL.    $2,200,000
To Murfreesboro, TN, to renovate the Bradley Academy for a              
 multi-purpose community/cultural/heritage and civic                    
 center...................................................      $480,000
Community development in Astoria, NY......................    $1,500,000
People's Firehouse, Inc. for community development                      
 activities in Brooklyn, NY...............................    $1,000,000
Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Corporation in              
 New York, NY.............................................      $500,000
Storm water drainage improvements in Smallwood Village in               
 Charles County, MD.......................................      $225,000
Opportunity Park, in Bowie, MD............................      $200,000
Rehabilitation of facilities in the Nanjemoy community in               
 Charles County, MD.......................................      $500,000
Restoration of a well under the jurisdiction of the                     
 Potomac Heights Home Owners Association in western                     
 Charles County, MD.......................................      $125,000
To Tulsa, OK, for the Kendall-Whittier neighborhood                     
 revitalization and stabilization demonstration project...    $1,000,000
To Nanticoke, PA, for infrastructure and economic                       
 development activities...................................    $1,800,000
To the City of Toledo, OH, to create a strong community                 
 anchor in the heart of the downtown, concentrating on                  
 restoring the Toledo Farmers' Market and helping                       
 rehabilitate the nearby abandoned Portside Marketplace...    $2,000,000
To the City of Toledo, OH, to work in conjunction with the              
 Toledo Area Transit Authority and other agencies to                    
 renovate Central Union Terminal through abandoned                      
 building demolition and site improvements................    $1,000,000
To the City of Oregon, OH, for completion of a sanitary                 
 sewer system serving the city and the adjacent                         
 unincorporated village of Harbor View....................      $500,000
Relocation of the Camillus House shelter and medical                    
 clinic in Miami, FL......................................    $2,000,000
Emergency repair and restoration of the water supply                    
 system for the City of Landers, CA.......................    $3,800,000
Permanent restoration of public buildings and equipment in              
 the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, CA...........    $2,750,000
Project Access programs of the Green Hills Rural                        
 Development Corporation in Trenton, Missouri, and the                  
 Northwest Missouri Regional Development Corporation in                 
 Maryville, Missouri......................................      $800,000
To continue the economic development activities of the                  
 Redwood Region Economic Development Commission in                      
 Humboldt County, CA......................................      $850,000
South Chandler housing and community redevelopment in                   
 Chandler, Arizona........................................    $1,000,000
Construction and public improvements near Crestline in San              
 Bernardino County, CA....................................      $375,000
Downtown renovation and the revitalization of central city              
 recreation infrastructure serving low- and moderate-                   
 income citizens in Lewiston, Maine.......................    $1,150,000
Infrastructure improvements related to the construction of              
 low- and moderate-income housing in Ames, Iowa...........      $950,000
Casa Pacifica shelter care facility in Ventura County, CA.      $960,000
An economic development project based at the Indian Hills               
 Community College in Ottuma, Iowa........................      $400,000
To construct a new facility for the Boys and Girls Club of              
 San Marcos, CA...........................................      $500,000
Facility costs for the Boys and Girls Club of Escondido,                
 CA.......................................................      $375,000
Equipment for Children's Hospital and Health Center of San              
 Diego, CA................................................    $1,375,000
To the Mesa Grande Indian Tribe of San Diego County, CA,                
 for a manufacturing plant for factory-built wood frame                 
 structures...............................................    $1,250,000
Drug elimination demonstration program at a state-owned                 
 public housing complex known as Levister Towers in Mount               
 Vernon, NY...............................................    $1,000,000
Construction of a senior center in the Town of Smithfield,              
 RI.......................................................      $600,000
To Newburyport, MA, for renovation/addition to police                   
 facilities...............................................    $1,300,000
Monroe County, PA, Housing Authority to rehabilitate a low-             
 income elderly and disabled housing project..............      $700,000
Lackawanna Junior College, Scranton, PA, to establish the               
 National Career Prep and Distance Training Center for low-             
 income and public housing residents......................    $1,800,000
Feasibility study on infrastructure improvements needed                 
 for the economic development of the Peoria, Illinois,                  
 area.....................................................    $1,500,000
Capital repairs to the facilities operated by Federated                 
 Dorchester Neighborhood Houses, Inc. in Dorchester, MA...    $2,000,000
To the West Virginia High-Technology Consortium for a high-             
 technology incubator facility in Marion County, WV, to                 
 promote emerging technologies in rural areas.............    $1,000,000
To the City of Wheeling, WV, for educational and                        
 recreational opportunities for at-risk youth and the                   
 acquisition and renovation of dilapidated housing........      $600,000
To the City of Morgantown, WV, for downtown renewal and                 
 revitalization activities................................    $1,000,000
To Arthurdale Heritage, Inc., for needed revitalization                 
 and infrastructure improvements to the Community of                    
 Arthurdale, WV...........................................      $500,000
City of Mannington, WV, to rehabilitate arson damaged                   
 areas and for other revitalization projects within the                 
 Mannington district......................................      $400,000
Victory Housing, Inc., to build Bartholomew House, a                    
 facility for the frail elderly, in Montgomery County, MD.    $1,500,000
Facility improvements at the Laurel Mountain Recreation                 
 Area in Ligonier, PA.....................................    $1,300,000
Renovation of Point Stadium in Johnstown, PA..............    $1,360,000
To renovate Perry School in Washington, DC, into a multi-               
 purpose service center designed to meet the poverty-                   
 related needs of the community...........................    $1,000,000
Temporary shelter for families while their homes are                    
 undergoing lead-based paint abatement in Newark, NJ......    $1,500,000
To establish a center for Pacific Rim Studies at the                    
 University of San Francisco, CA..........................    $1,500,000
North Carolina Housing Trust Fund.........................    $1,000,000
To New York City, NY, for New York City Medical College to              
 improve health care delivery in the city.................    $2,000,000
Clayton Housing Authority's (New Mexico) comprehensive                  
 improvement project......................................      $500,000
To the City of Elkhart, Indiana, to establish an Elkhart                
 Entrepreneur's Revolving Loan Fund.......................      $900,000
To the City of Chicago's (IL) Low-Income Housing Trust                  
 Fund.....................................................    $1,300,000
Expansion of the Salesian Boys and Girls Club in East Los               
 Angeles, CA..............................................      $500,000
To Cibola County, NM, for a multi-agency visitor center to              
 provide economic benefits for the western part of New                  
 Mexico...................................................    $1,500,000
To the Bay Area Foundation in Bay City, MI, for municipal               
 infrastructure, economic development, and other municipal              
 purposes.................................................    $2,747,000
Community Development Resource Center in western Monroe                 
 County, NY, at Roberts Wesleyan College..................    $2,000,000
Renovation of facilities in the Adirondack Destruction                  
 Assessment Program in NY.................................    $1,500,000
To develop a training program in East Cleveland (OH) for                
 single mothers to enable them to be economically self                  
 sufficient...............................................    $2,000,000
Hitchcock Center in Cleveland, OH, for assistance to women              
 who are substance abusers................................    $1,000,000
To Michigan State University for continuation of an urban               
 extension program........................................      $300,000
Bellefaire Residential Treatment Center for Children in                 
 Cleveland, OH, for renovation activities and to enhance                
 special service needs....................................    $2,000,000
Katheryn Tyler Multi-Purpose Family Center in Cleveland,                
 OH.......................................................    $1,000,000
Urban redevelopment and small business development project              
 in Kalamazoo, MI.........................................      $650,000
Redevelopment of the Broadway Corridor project in Gary, IN    $1,500,000
To the City of Chicago (IL) for non-profit counseling                   
 organizations for a prepurchase and foreclosure-                       
 prevention counseling demonstration program..............      $900,000
New Directions project for homeless veterans in Los                     
 Angeles, CA..............................................    $1,500,000
City of Chicago's (IL) Preservation Predevelopment Program    $1,300,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    TITLE IX--BLUE SMOKE AND MIRRORS

SEC. 901. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

    (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that the tactic of delaying 
obligations in the appropriations process is an irresponsible budgeting 
technique which will only serve to exacerbate the budget deficit and 
the national debt.
    (b) Sense of the Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress that, 
with regard to the appropriations process, ``forward funding'' tactics 
should no longer be utilized and the Congress should operate within the 
funding limits prescribed for each fiscal year.

                                 <all>

HR 1392 IH----2
HR 1392 IH----3
HR 1392 IH----4
HR 1392 IH----5`