alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 119A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.119.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 119A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 537 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.119.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 119A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 537 May 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2010/C 119A/01 | Recruitment Notice PE/123/S — Director (Function group AD 14) — Legal Service — Directorate for Institutional and Parliamentary Affairs | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2010/C 119A/01

Recruitment Notice PE/123/S — Director (Function group AD 14) — Legal Service — Directorate for Institutional and Parliamentary Affairs

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit (10.1)



May 10, 2005



Mr. Daniel A. Carp
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Eastman Kodak Company
343 State Street
Rochester, NY 14650

Dear Dan:

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the
Executive Compensation and Development Committee (the
"Committee") of the Board of Directors of Eastman Kodak
Company (the "Company") has granted "permitted and approved
reason" status for all equity awards, including all stock
options, restricted stock and restricted stock units,
including awards under the Company's Performance Stock
Program, held by you or for your account, and for purposes
of any award to be paid to you under the Company's
Leadership Stock Program or Performance Stock Program, upon
your retirement from the Company on January 1, 2006.  This
means that you will not forfeit any of your equity awards as
a result of your retirement on January 1, 2006.  In
addition, the Committee has determined that any remaining
restriction periods on your restricted stock or restricted
stock units will terminate as of the date of your
retirement.

Congratulations on a long and successful career at the
Company.  I wish you all the best for the future.

                              Sincerely,

                              /s/ Timothy M. Donahue

                              Timothy M. Donahue





Timothy M. Donahue, Chairman, Executive Compensation and
Development Committee

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY  343 STATE STREET  ROCHESTER, NEW YORK
14650

TEL (585) 724-4000
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-41528, No. 33-78846, No. 33-55442, No. 33-89368, No. 33-55440,
No. 33-78840, No. 33-89370 and No. 33-89366) of Cellular Communications
International, Inc. (the "Company") and (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 33-90980) of the Company and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
March 18, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the
Company included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 1996.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 1997
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 50501 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Everardo Monita -**  **Zamora,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:22 - CR - 211 - 2

**_______________ _______________**  Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Everardo Monita - Zamora has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Monita - Zamora has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5 . United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 27, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50501 Document: 46-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2024No. 23 - 50501

2 well as Monita - Zamora ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSE D**  . See **5th Cir. R .**  42.2. Monita - Zamora’s request for the appointment of counsel is **DENIED** . See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902 - 03 (5th Cir. 1998). Case: 23-50501 Document: 46-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
{"agency":"NCD","generated":"2017-10-04 11:43:44","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"}],"value":"2017"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NCD"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":[" "]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":[" "]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2017","quarter":"Q4"}
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1522

To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1994 for the operation and

maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1993

Mr. TAUZIN (for himself, Mr. STUDDS, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, and Mr. COBLE)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize expenditures for fiscal year 1994 for the operation and maintenance of the Panama Canal, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Panama Canal Com5 mission Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF EXPENDITURES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Panama Canal Commission

8 is authorized to make such expenditures within the limits

9 of funds and borrowing authority available to it in accord-
2

•HR 1522 IH

1 ance with law and to make such contracts and commit2 ments without regard to fiscal year limitations, as may

3 be necessary under the Panama Canal Act of 1979 (22

4 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.) for the operation, maintenance, and

5 improvement of the Panama Canal for fiscal year 1994.

6 (b) LIMITATIONS.—Expenditures under subsection

7 (a) for administrative expenses shall be limited to

8 $51,742,000, of which not to exceed—

9 (1) $11,000 may be expended for official recep10 tion and representation expenses of the Panama

11 Canal Commission Board of Directors;

12 (2) $5,000 may be expended for official recep13 tion and representation expenses of the Panama

14 Canal Commission Secretary; and

15 (3) $30,000 may be expended for official recep16 tion and representation expenses of the Panama

17 Canal Administrator.

18 (c) REPLACEMENT VEHICLES.—Available funds may

19 be used, under the authority of subsection (a), for the pur20 chase of not more than 35 passenger motor vehicles for

21 replacement only (including large heavy-duty vehicles used

22 to transport Commission personnel across the Isthmus of

23 Panama). The purchase price of each vehicle purchased

24 under this subsection may not exceed $18,000.
3

•HR 1522 IH

1 SEC. 3. EXPENDITURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH OTHER

2 LAWS.

3 Expenditures authorized under this Act may be made

4 only in accordance with the Panama Canal Treaties of

5 1977 and any law of the United States implementing

6 those treaties.

7 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 This Act shall take effect October 1, 1993.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<CURRENCY>                       U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                 11,104
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          61,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      114,206
<PP&E>                                 32,377
<DEPRECIATION>                          9,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        404,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  57,687
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  217
<OTHER-SE>                            178,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          404,283
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      233,430
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         210,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      4,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        18,997
<INCOME-TAX>                            7,219
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    11,778
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           11,778
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.51



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.7

2004 Bonus Awards

On March 2, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company approved the following bonus awards for the Company's named executive
officers: Joseph R. Gromek ($864,000); Lawrence R. Rutkowski ($369,600); Roger
A. Williams ($436,800); Frank Tworecke ($309,288); and Stanley P. Silverstein
($352,800).
April 28, 1969

HonorableW. C. Lindsey CriminalDistrict Attorney Jefferson County Courthouse Beaumont, Texas~ OpinionNO. ~~-381 HB: Authority of a constable to form a standby auxiliary force under stated facts. Dear Mr. Lindsey: In your letter asked the following

“1.

"2.

"3.

"4
.

"5.

You What authority, if any, does a constablehave to form a standby auxlllary force? If such authority exists, what procedure should be followed in activatingthe auxiliary force? If such authority exists,may the auxiliary officer carry a pistol while on official duty? If such authority exists, will the auxiliary officer be permitted to work alone, or will he have'

to work under the Immediatedirection of the constablebr a deputy constable? Would the auxiliary officer be entitled to compensationor would they be required to serve without compensation?" further state: "The proposed auxiliary fbrce:wlll number about '5O,.,m9n,, These ~n~~Wka~..s~. will attend 'tralnlng'd~&ss~~'much like rookie policemen are required to do now.

to Attorney General Martin, you questions:

- .18.86 -HonorableW. C, Lindsey, Page.2, (M- 381 )

ConstableRollin@ has 'Informed me,that if an auxiliary force Is perniltted,

he ititenda

to~use them in civil disorders,disaaters, parades, civic functiona, ballgames, etc.“ Ai%lcle 6879 and 6879 (a), Vernon's Clvl.1 Statutes,

~., set forth the rules governing' the appointmentof,deputy " constables. You will note that the Commissioner@' Court is required to approve and'confin!the appointmentof .:':. deputy constables,and that each coristable Is llmited.,~.',~.

I' ~1. in the number of deputieshe may appoint. Therefore, it Is 'ouropinion that a constableddes not have the authority to form a staridby auxiliary force by the appointment'ofdeputies. The various Btatuteswhich authorize the constables (and sheriff, etc.) tci call citizens to their aid &tieaimed at specific emergency situationsand"do not Contemplate a permanent organlzatioti to give euch aid.' We also observe that the'leglalature has outlawed bodies of citizens, other than the state and federal mllltla, from associatingthemselvestogether in a militia-typeorganization and carrying firearms In public. See Article 5780, Section 6, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Since our researoh of the Texas Statutesand Constitutionfails to disclose any authoritywhich would permit or authorize a constable to form an auxiliary force, It Is unnecessary to answer your other questions which were conditionedon the existence of such authority. SUMMARY

There is no statutory or constitutional authority for a constable to form a standby auxiliary force for olvil disaster or police duty as contemplate@

under the stated facts. ruly yours,

- 1887 -HonorableW. C. Lindsey, Pa@ 3, (M- 381 )

Preparedby Howard M. Fender AssistantAttorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: Kerns Taylor, Chaiman George Kelton, Vioe-Chairman Tom Bullington Harold Kennedy Jay Floyd Bob Gwen W. V. Geppert Staff Legal Assistant Hawthorne Philllpe Executive Assistant

- 1888-
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of J.L., A.L., and J.L.,
Children

No. 06

- 19

- 00078

- CV Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 18C0315

- 102 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and
Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant s ha ve adequately indicated t h e i r inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 10, 2020
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### HICKS et al. v. WALLIS LUMBER CO.

No. 10667.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 17, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Eeb. 28, 1940.

John T. Spann, of Crystal City, for plaintiffs in error.

Geo. C. Herman and Jackson & Crawford, all of Crystal City, for defendant in error.

MURRAY, Justice.

This su>t is in the nature of a bill of review to set aside a judgment in cause No, 2233, in the District Court of Zavala County, styled Wallis Lumber Company v. B. Hicks et al., for the sum of $3,506.50, and foreclosing a mechanic’s and material-man’s lien for the sum of $458.57 of that amount. The judgment was entered November 20, 1934, and this suit was filed after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was entered.

Appellees submit a counter proposition calling the attention of this court to the fact that plaintiffs in error B. Hicks and Laura Hicks did not offer any evidence below tending to establish the fact that they were prevented from presenting any meritorious defenses which they may have had to the original suit by any fraud, accident or acts of the defendant in error, Wallis Lumber Company.

Before a party is entitled to have a judgment set aside by a procedure in the nature of a bill of review he must first show by competent evidence that he had a meritorious defense to the cause of action, and that he was prevented from presenting such meritorious defense by some fraud, accident or the wrongful .acts of the opposing party, unmixed with any fault or negligence of his own. Smith v. Ferrell, Tex.Com.App., 44 S.W.2d 962; Gehret v. Hetkes, Tex.Com.App., 36 S.W. 2d 700.

Plaintiffs in error having failed to make such proof the trial court properly rendered judgment that they take nothing by reason of their suit.

The above holding renders it unnecessary to pass upon the propositions presented in plaintiffs in error’s brief.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from form 10Q and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         18,376
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,932
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,983
<PP&E>                                         237,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                 127,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 411,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,451
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       70
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   411,716
<SALES>                                        198,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               198,611
<CGS>                                          109,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,750
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Saunders, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), entered June 16, 1989, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the second degree and sentencing him, as a violent predicate felony of*285fender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of *3 ¥2*to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his application that a renunciation charge be submitted to the jury as an affirmative defense. The evidence in this case makes clear that whatever arguable abandonment occurred in defendant’s criminal purpose, it did not manifest voluntary and complete renunciation. *(See,*Penal Law § 40.10 [3].) Rather, the evidence indicates that circumstances existed which rendered the accomplishment of defendant’s criminal purpose difficult, to the extent that the victim persuaded him that she did not have money, or else that defendant postponed his criminal conduct only to transfer his criminal effort to another victim. (Penal Law § 40.10 [5].) We also note that the second potential victim, as well as other people, arrived at the bank shortly after the incident, from which it may be inferred that the defendant withdrew from the attempted robbery out of fear of detection *(see, e.g., People v Gilmore,*134 AD2d 653, *lv denied*72 NY2d 859). Defendant has failed to carry his burden of proving the affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence *(People v Butts,*72 NY2d 746, 749, n 1) and no reasonable view of the evidence supports a finding of the affirmative defense of renunciation, relieving the court of any obligation to submit the question to the jury *(People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299, 301).

Finally, defendant has failed to preserve any challenge to the prosecutor’s summation by objection, as a matter of law. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.
exv10w20



 











Exhibit 10.20




Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.

Executive Cash Incentive




On February 25, 2005, the Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors approved a
cash incentive program for executives. The program provides for cash payments based on the Company
and individuals achieving certain targets. For 2005 the Company’s target is based on EBITDA.
H. R. 1513

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 10th and Main Streets in

Richmond, Virginia, as the ‘‘Lewis F. Powell, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LEWIS F. POWELL, JR. UNITED STATES

COURTHOUSE.

The United States courthouse located at 10th and Main Streets

in Richmond, Virginia, is designated as the ‘‘Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

Any references in any law, regulation, document, record, map,

or other paper of the United States to the courthouse referred

to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lewis F. Powell,

Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

18:08 Sep 20, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\H1513.ENR bend06