alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Minerals Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| \s\ Jeffrey G.  Clevenger                          |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey G.  Clevenger                              |   |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer             |   |
| May 11,  2009                                 |   |
|                                               |
|                                               |
| \s\ Robert P.  Vogels                              |   |
| Robert P. Vogels                                   |   |
| Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 11,  2009                                 |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011701
<NAME> RIFKIN ACQUISITION CAPITAL CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                       398
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         137,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        231,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,957
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,078  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,432)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,015)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The amount shown for current assets and current liabilities is
zero due to an unclassified balance sheet in the financial
statements.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EX-10.1



 






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT

TO

THE SCOTTS COMPANY 1992 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


2005 AMENDMENT




     WHEREAS, the shareholders of The Scotts Company (“Scotts”) previously approved the adoption of
The Scotts Company 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, on March 18, 2005 (the “Effective Time”), Scotts consummated the restructuring of
Scotts’ corporate structure into a holding company structure by merging Scotts into a wholly-owned
second-tier Ohio limited liability company subsidiary, The Scotts Company LLC (“Scotts LLC”),
pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 13, 2004 (the “Merger
Agreement”), by and among Scotts, Scotts LLC and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (the “Company”);
and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company assumed, as of the Effective Time, the
Plan and all obligations and liabilities of Scotts thereunder; and



     WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan provides that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”)
may amend the Plan at any time; and



     WHEREAS, the Board has resolved to amend the Plan to reflect the Company’s assumption of the
Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective as of the Effective Time as follows:



     1. The title of the Plan is amended to be “The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company 1992 Long Term
Incentive Plan.”



     2. Section 2.1(i) of the Plan is amended and restated to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“Company” means The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, an Ohio corporation, and any successor thereto.



     3. Section 2.1(s) of the Plan is amended and restated to read, in its entirety, as follows:
“Plan” means The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan, as in effect from time
to time.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the 6th day of
May, 2005, to be effective as of March 18, 2005.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY

 	 
	 	By /s/ Christopher L. Nagel

 	 
	 	Print Name:  Christopher L. Nagel
 	 
	 	Title:  	EVP and Chief Financial Officer
#### WHITE v. STATE.

No. 21130.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 5, 1940.

J.- C. Jacobs, of Corsicana, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of' Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

■ Conviction is for an aggravated assault, punishment fixed at one month in jail and a fine of $25.

We find in the record the verdict of the jury ’assessing the punishment indicated, but no judgment appears to have been -entered thereon. If so, it is not shown in the transcript which has been forwarded to this court.

Without a judgment the jurisdiction of this court does not attach. , :

The appeal is dismissed.
Site Assessment & Non-NPL 

Federal Facilities Branch

An Overview

Alizabeth Olhasso

Site Discovery

Preliminary Assessment (PA)

Site Inspection (SI)

HRS Package

The Site 

Assessment 

HRS Package Process

Proposal to NPL

Public Comment

Site Placed on NPL

Process
Hazard Ranking System (HRS)

 The HRS is used to assess the 

relative threat associated with actual

or potential releases of hazardous 

substances. 

 The HRS is the primary screening 

tool for determining whether a site is 

to be included on the NPL. A score 

of 28.5 makes a site eligible for the 

NPL.
Basis of HRS Score - Pathways

 Ground water migration

 Surface water migration (composed of the 

three threats — drinking water, human 

food chain, and environmental)

 Soil exposure (composed of two threats —

resident population and nearby 

population)

 Air migration. 
Scoring for each Pathway

Each pathway is assessed for the following:

 Likelihood of release (or, for the soil 

exposure pathway, likelihood of exposure)

 Waste characteristics

 Targets 
Region 3 Site Assessment Statistics

 167 Sites on the NPL in Region 3

 95 in PA

 31 in VA

 9 in WV

 18 in MD

 14 in DE

 6,000 Sites in the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Information System (CERCLIS) in Region 3 

ALONE

 1,700 of those are active sites!
Non-NPL Federal Facilities

A Federal facility can fall into one or more of 

the following categories:

 CERCLA site

 Federal Docket site 

 Formerly used defense site (FUD site)

 Military munitions response program 

(MMRP)
Federal Facilities Docket

 Sites are listed if they have had a 

reporting requirement under RCRA 

sections 3005, 3010, 3016 or 

CERCLA section 103.

 Region 3 has 273 sites on the 

Docket.

 Listed sites must submit a PA for EPA 

review to determine NPL eligibility.
FUD Sites

 Sites are potentially contaminated with 

hazardous substances as well as ordnance and 

explosives and related wastes.

 Approximately 560 sites in Region 3. Nationally 

there are around 9,000 sites.

 Clean-up estimated at $15-20 B. 

 May take over 70 years to complete.

 DoD is responsible for addressing FUDs under the 

Defense and Environmental Restoration Program 

Act (DERP). 

 This responsibility is delegated to the Army Corp 

of Engineers (USACE).
MMRP Sites

 MMRP sites are DoD sites that contain 

munitions and explosives of concern 

and/or munitions constituents.

 Over 3,500 sites on more than 15 million 

acres are on the MMRP inventory 

nationwide. Region 3 had 282 MMRP sites 

in 2006.

 Region 3’s highest profile MMRP sites 

currently are Spring Valley and Plum Tree 

Island.
Site Assessment & 

Non-NPL Federal Facilities 

Questions?
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1167

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent an institution

from participating in the Pell Grant program if the institution is ineligible for participation in the Federal Stafford Loan program because

of high default rates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. GORDON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prevent

an institution from participating in the Pell Grant program if the institution is ineligible for participation in

the Federal Stafford Loan program because of high default rates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFAULT RATE INELIGIBILITY FOR PELL

4 GRANT PROGRAM.

5 Section 481(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965

6 (20 U.S.C. 1088a) is amended by adding at the end the

7 following new paragraph:
2

•HR 1167 IH

1 ‘‘(7) An institution may not qualify as an institution

2 of higher education for purposes of the Pell Grant pro3 gram under subpart 1 of part A of this title if such institu4 tion is ineligible to participate in a loan program under

5 part B of this title as a result of a default rate determina6 tion under section 435(a).’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with

9 respect to periods of enrollment beginning on or after the

10 date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               REGAN HOLDING CORP.
                 FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I am the Chief  Executive  Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Company's  annual  report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2004
("Form 10-K").

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby  certify  that,  to the best of my
knowledge,  the Form 10-K fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained  in the Form 10-K  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 31, 2005
                           /s/ Lynda L. Regan
                           -------------------------
                           Lynda L. Regan
                           Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906 has been  provided to Regan  Holding
Corp.  and  will be  retained  by  Regan  Holding  Corp.  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.6: AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN



 








Exhibit 10.6




AMENDMENT TO

UNITED COMMUNITY BANKSHARES OF FLORIDA, INC.

OFFICERS’ AND EMPLOYEES’ STOCK OPTION PLAN




     THIS AMENDMENT to the United Community Bankshares of Florida, Inc. Officers’ and Employees’
Stock Option Plan (the “Amendment”) is made as of the 1st day of February, 2005.



WITNESSETH THAT:




     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the shareholders of United Community Bankshares of
Florida, Inc. (the “Bank”) have authorized, adopted and approved an Officers’ and Employees’ Stock
Option Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Bank desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1. Defined Terms. All terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Plan
shall have the meanings specified in the Plan, unless specifically defined herein.



     2. Amendment of Section 4.1. Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended to provide
that, subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 of the Plan, the number of
shares of Stock which may be issued and sold under the Plan pursuant to Stock Option Agreements
shall not exceed Four Hundred Eight Two Thousand One Hundred Thirty Two (482,132) shares.



     3. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms,
covenants, and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by its officer
thereunto duly authorized, all as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	UNITED COMMUNITY BANKSHARES OF FLORIDA, INC.	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David G. Powers	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	     David G. Powers

     President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1                                                   

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2017 of Eternal Speech, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Suthep Thepchit, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Eternal Speech, Inc.

By: /s/ Suthep Thepchit

----------------------------------------

Suthep Thepchit

President, Chief Executive Officer 

and Director

Dated:  June 14, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1555 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1555

     To terminate the Ground-Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 1993

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To terminate the Ground-Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF THE GROUND-WAVE EMERGENCY NETWORK.

    (a) Termination of Program.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
terminate the Ground-Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) program.
    (b) Funding Limitation.--No funds may be obligated or expended 
after the date of the enactment of this Act under a contract for the 
Ground-Wave Emergency Network program except as necessary for 
termination or cancellation liability arising out of any such contract 
in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      RULE 13a - 14(b) CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                                FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officers of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Corporation") hereby certify that the Corporation's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended July 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

                               Dated: September 11, 2006

                               /s/ S. LESLIE FLEGEL
                               ------------------------------------------
                               Name:  S. Leslie Flegel
                               Title: Chief Executive Officer

                               /s/ MARC FIERMAN
                               ------------------------------------------
                               Name:  Marc Fierman
                               Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Thomas R. Oxenreiter
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Thomas R. Oxenreiter    
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** **

** **

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 25,2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLANDLOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as SpecialServicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIAITON, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANKTRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, DBWF2015- LCM (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-620-001]

Take notice that on November 21, 2000, Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Stingray), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariffs, with an effective date of November 1, 2000.

Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 132

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 133

Stingray states that the tendered sheets are filed in compliance with the Commission's October 27, 2000 Order in the referenced dockets, regarding the netting and trading of imbalances on Stingray's system.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30741  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M