alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### RAILROAD COMMISSION et al. v. YOUNG.

No. 2248.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Oct. 5, 1939.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and Glenn R. Lewis and Geo. W. Barcus, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

Henry Jackson, of Groesbeck, for appel-lee.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This suit was brought by Humboldt B. Young, Jr., against the Railroad Commission of Texas and others to restrain the defendants from enforcing against plaintiff the provisions of the Motor Truck Law. Upon presentation of the petition at an ex-parte hearing and without the introduction of evidence, the trial court granted a temporary injunction as prayed. The defendants appealed.

The sole ground alleged by plaintiff for the issuance of the injunction was that the Railroad Commission had issued certain ' rules and regulations fixing the charges to be made by plaintiff and others engaged in the transportation of oil field equipment and supplies, and that such rules and regulations were “arbitrary, unreasonable, unjust and discriminatory.” The plaintiff did not allege in what manner these rules were “arbitrary, unreasonable, unjust and discrinlinatory,” or that he had attempted to obtain relief therefrom .by a *148suit in the district court of Travis county. Neither did the plaintiff allege that he had a permit or certificate of convenience and necessity from the Railroad Commission authorizing him to operate his truck in the transportation of freight over the highways of this state. It is readily apparent that the petition wholly failed to state a cause of action. In the absence of a permit/the plaintiff had no right to operate his truck in the transportation of freight over the highways. Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 911b. If he had such permit and the rules promulgated by the Railroad Commission appertaining to his business as such were unreasonable, his remedy was by suit in the district court of Travis county and not elsewhere. Id.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the injunction is dissolved. All costs, including those in the lower court and on appeal, will be adjudged against the appellee and the sureties on his injunction bond as provided in Revised Statutes, art. 4649.
Jonathan Brousseau 2233 Ala wai apt 2b Honolulu Hawaii 96815 808 384-2691 skillet808@yahoo.com

Aloha,

This is my petition for the use of Unmanned aerial vehicles(drones) for the specific use of aerial photography and videography. I have been using these for 5 years now and have been flying model airplanes and helicopters for about 20 years..

In the past 5 years I have designed, built and flown multi rotor craft. Learning about all aspects and operations. Although I am not a FAA certified pilot, I have observed and learned about aviation since a kid. Have about 5 hours on my uncles Cessna. My purpose is entirely for photography reasons and have no interest in flying these in a unsafe manor doing tricks or acrobatics.

In Hawaii I was one of the first flying these types of craft and have always stuck to safety and planning.. I have given classes and one on one instruction to more than a dozen people and am committed to the eduction and safety regarding unmanned aircraft..

Thanks for listening,

Jonathan
exv4w5



 






EXHIBIT 4.5




Schedule of Fixed Rate InterNotes Issued




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Interest Coupon	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Redemption
	CUSIP No.	 	Interest Coupon Rate	 	Frequency	 	Issue Date	 	Maturity Date	 	Principal Amount	 	Information
	26876EBD6

	 	 	3.450	%	 	Monthly
	 	01/06/05
	 	01/15/07
	 	$	281,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBE4

	 	 	4.000	%	 	Monthly
	 	01/06/05
	 	01/15/09
	 	$	1,461,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBF1

	 	 	3.500	%	 	Monthly
	 	01/13/05
	 	01/15/07
	 	$	391,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBG9

	 	 	4.000	%	 	Monthly
	 	01/13/05
	 	01/15/09
	 	$	1,112,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBH7

	 	 	3.650	%	 	Semi-annual
	 	01/21/05
	 	01/15/07
	 	$	557,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBJ3

	 	 	4.150	%	 	Semi-annual
	 	01/21/05
	 	01/15/09
	 	$	944,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBK0

	 	 	3.700	%	 	Semi-annual
	 	01/27/05
	 	01/15/07
	 	$	349,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBL8

	 	 	4.150	%	 	Semi-annual
	 	01/27/05
	 	01/15/09
	 	$	1,126,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBM6

	 	 	3.700	%	 	Monthly
	 	02/17/05
	 	02/15/07
	 	$	252,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBN4

	 	 	4.100	%	 	Monthly
	 	02/17/05
	 	02/15/09
	 	$	1,113,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBP9

	 	 	3.750	%	 	Monthly
	 	02/25/05
	 	02/15/07
	 	$	942,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBQ7

	 	 	4.150	%	 	Quarterly
	 	02/25/05
	 	02/15/09
	 	$	913,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBR5

	 	 	4.050	%	 	Semi-annual
	 	03/03/05
	 	03/15/08
	 	$	3,118,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBS3

	 	 	4.250	%	 	Quarterly
	 	03/03/05
	 	03/15/09
	 	$	866,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBT1

	 	 	4.400	%	 	Quarterly
	 	03/31/05
	 	03/15/08
	 	$	846,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EBU8

	 	 	4.750	%	 	Quarterly
	 	03/31/05
	 	03/15/10
	 	$	167,000	 	 	Non-callable
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 71078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30448]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-112502-00]
RIN 1545-AY45


Guidance Under Subpart F Relating to Partnerships; Hearing 
Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public 
hearing on proposed rulemaking relating to the treatment of a 
controlled foreign corporation's (CFC's) distributive share of 
partnership income.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for Tuesday, December 5, 
2000, at 10 a.m., is canceled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Treena Garrett of the Regulations 
Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and Strategic Planning), 
at 622-7180 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on September 
20, 2000 (65 FR 56836), announced that a public hearing was scheduled 
for December 5, 2000, in the Internal Revenue Building, 1111 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public 
hearing is proposed regulations. The deadline for outlines of oral 
comments and requests to speak expired on November 14, 2000.
    The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, 
instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to 
submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. 
As of November 21, 2000, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the 
public hearing scheduled for December 5, 2000, is canceled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and 
Strategic Planning).
[FR Doc. 00-30448 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1327 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1327

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
   limitation on the use of claim sampling to deny claims or recover 
                overpayments under the medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1993

   Mr. Richardson introduced the following bill; which was referred 
  jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
   limitation on the use of claim sampling to deny claims or recover 
                overpayments under the medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF CLAIM SAMPLING TO DENY CLAIMS OR 
              RECOVER OVERPAYMENTS UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) Limitation on Use of Claim Sampling.--Section 1869(a) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ff(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) The determination'' and inserting 
        ``(a)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the determination''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(2) Except for purposes of assessing civil money penalties for 
fraud under section 1128A(a)--
            ``(A) the determination of whether an individual is 
        entitled to benefits under part A or part B shall be based 
        solely on the individual's entitlement to such benefits; and
            ``(B) the Secretary may not make any determination with 
        respect to any claim for benefits described in paragraph (1) by 
        applying information obtained through a process of claim 
        sampling to such claim.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--(1) Section 1862(f) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395y(f)) is amended by striking ``otherwise'' and inserting 
``otherwise that meets the requirements of section 1869(a)(2)''.
    (2) Section 1869(b)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ff(b)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``subsection (a)'' and inserting ``subsection 
(a)(1)''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to determinations on 
claims for benefits under title XVIII of the Social Security Act issued 
on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 398 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 398

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
      To establish the fourth Sunday of July as ``Parents' Day''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the fourth Sunday of 
every July shall be established as ``Parents' Day'' to be recognized as 
a recurring, perennial day of commemoration.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION.

    All private citizens, organizations, and governmental and 
legislative bodies at the local, State, and Federal level are 
encouraged to recognize Parents' Day through proclamations, activities, 
and educational efforts in furtherance of recognizing, uplifting, and 
supporting the role of parents in the rearing of their children.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 398

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

      To establish the fourth Sunday of July as ``Parents' Day''.`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KAYENTA KREATIONS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       28
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,336
<PP&E>                                          12,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,492
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,019
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,830
<SALES>                                            377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   377
<CGS>                                              210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,186
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA 4132]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on September 1, 2000, in response to a petition filed by the company on behalf of workers at Nova Bus, Inc., Roswell, New Mexico.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 20th day of November, 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-30617  Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I,  Lynda L.  Regan,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of Regan
Holding Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002
("the Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d))  and that the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Lynda L. Regan
                                 Lynda L. Regan
                                 March 31, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Regan Holding Corp.  and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### YOUNG et al. v. WOOLDRIDGE.

No. 3409.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

March 2, 1939.

O. Etheridge, A. A. Turner, and James M. Crane, all of Conroe, for appellants.

Pitts & Liles, of Conroe, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This suit, an action in trespass to try title, was filed in Montgomery County by Emma Johnson and certain other parties .as plaintiffs against appellee, E. C. Wool--dridge, to recover the title and possession of an undivided interest in a certain tract ■of land in Montgomery County. Appel-lee answered by demurrers, and by pleas of not guilty, and of the five and ten year statutes of limitations. Vernon’s Ann.Civ. St. arts. 5509, 5510. On trial to the court without a jury, judgment was entered to the effect “that the plaintiffs, except Emma Johnson, have no right, title, or demand in or to” the land in controversy; by the judgment Emma Johnson was “vested with the life estate in and to one-third of an undivided one-half of the above described lands.” Appellants present only one theory ■of error — the construction of the deed dated the 26th day of October, 1893, recorded- in Vol. 12, page 504 of the deed records of Montgomery County from N. -C. Golding to Adeline Young; the common .-source. We pretermit a discussion of ap-pedants’ theory of error because under the undisputed evidence appellee had title to all the land in controversy except as to Emma Johnson by the statutes of limitations regularly plead by him.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1037 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a 

five-year pilot project to test the feasibility and advisability of expanding the scope of certain qualifying workstudy activities under title 38, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1037 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pilot College Work 

3 Study Programs for Veterans Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR PILOT PROGRAM FOR ON-CAMPUS 

5 WORK-STUDY POSITIONS. 

6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PILOT PROGRAM.—The Sec7 retary of Veterans Affairs shall conduct a five-year pilot 

8 project to test the feasibility and advisability of expanding 

9 the scope of qualifying work-study activities for purposes 

10 of section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, in11 cluding work-study positions available on site at edu12 cational institutions. 

13 (b) TYPE OF WORK-STUDY POSITIONS.—The work14 study positions referred to in subsection (a) may include 

15 positions in academic departments (including positions as 

16 tutors or research, teaching, and lab assistants) and in 

17 student services (including positions in career centers and 

18 financial aid, campus orientation, cashiers, admissions, 

19 records, and registration offices). 

20 (c) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall issue regula21 tions to carry out the pilot project under this section, in22 cluding regulations providing for the supervision of work23 study positions referred to in subsection (a) by appropriate 

24 personnel of the Department. 

25 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

26 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1037 RFS 

1 $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 

2 to carry out the pilot project under this section. 

3 (e) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding any other 

4 provision of law, this section shall not be carried out with 

5 any funds provided for or under any authority of the Re6 adjustment benefits program described by the list of Ap7 propriated Entitlements and Mandatories for Fiscal Year 

8 1997 contained in the Conference Report to accompany 

9 H.R. 2015 of the 105th Congress, the Balanced Budget 

10 Act of 1997 (H. Report 105–217). No funds shall be obli11 gated for the purpose of carrying out this section except 

12 discretionary funds appropriated specifically for the pur13 pose of carrying out this section in appropriation Acts en14 acted after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By ROBERT F. REEVES, 

Deputy Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,271]


Shipley Ronal, Inc. Freeport, New York; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on October 30, 2000, in response to a petition filed on 
behalf of workers at Shipley Ronal, Inc., Freeport, New York.
    A negative determination applicable to the petitioning group of 
workers was issued on October 4, 2000 (TA-W-38,050). No new information 
is evident which would result in a reversal of the Department's 
previous determination (the company closed December 21, 1999). 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose; and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of November 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-30620 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-50-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00429-CV

IN RE Ronald J. REYES Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 2, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED 

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus on July 13, 2015. This court granted a 

temporary stay of the challenged order and requested a response to the petition on July 16, 2015. 

The parties have advised that the real parties in interest have nonsuited the underlying 

action for grandparent access and the case in the trial court has been dismissed. The parties filed a 

joint motion to dismiss this mandamus proceeding on August 25, 2015. Accordingly, the 

temporary stay previously ordered by this court is lifted, the joint motion to dismiss is granted, and 

this original mandamus proceeding is dismissed as moot. 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CI-06251, styled In the Interest of P.R.R., A Child, pending in the 73rd

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding. Judge Walsh rendered the 

challenged order on May 8, 2015, which was later reduced to a written order and signed by Judge Karen Pozza.