alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Diario Oficial C 39A/7 de

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 39A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 60.° año7 de febrero de 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 39A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

60.° año7 de febrero de 2017

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Comisión Europea |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | Oficina Comunitaria de Variedades Vegetales — Convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés para ser designado presidente de la Sala de Recurso (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Comisión Europea

2017/C 39 A/01

Oficina Comunitaria de Variedades Vegetales — Convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés para ser designado presidente de la Sala de Recurso (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Comisión Europea

| 7.2.2017 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 39/1

---

OFICINA COMUNITARIA DE VARIEDADES VEGETALES

Convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés para ser designado presidente de la Sala de Recurso

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

La Oficina Comunitaria de Variedades Vegetales busca candidatos para cubrir el puesto de presidente de su Sala de Recurso.

Los solicitantes deben ser ciudadanos de uno de los Estados miembros de la Unión Europea.

El presidente será nombrado por el Consejo sobre la base de una lista de candidatos que propondrá la Comisión tras haber recabado la opinión del Consejo de Administración de la Oficina. Se puede solicitar información relativa a la remuneración a la Secretaría de la Sala de Recurso (Oficina Comunitaria de Variedades Vegetales, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, 49101 Angers Cedex 2, FRANCIA). La Oficina Comunitaria de Variedades Vegetales y la Comisión aplican una política de igualdad de oportunidades.

El texto íntegro de la convocatoria de manifestaciones de interés, así como el enlace al formulario de solicitud en línea, están disponibles en la siguiente dirección: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

El plazo de recepción de las candidaturas expira el 8 de marzo de 2017 (véase información detallada en las instrucciones para la presentación de candidaturas).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,102
<SECURITIES>                                    40,330
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,444
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,409
<PP&E>                                           9,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,080
<SALES>                                         11,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,590
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,137)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,481)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,656)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,656)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

    Date: August 5, 2004                       By:/s/ William C. Stone

                                               William C. Stone
                                               Chief Executive Officer

    Date: August 5, 2004                       By:/s/ Patrick J. Pedonti

                                               Patrick J. Pedonti
                                               Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q
pursuant to Item 601(b) (32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
   GOLD INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
   REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD  ENDING JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN
   ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                                      1,074,057
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               3,967,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                 5,533,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           11,162,134
<PP&E>                                                      5,072,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                              4,132,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             13,172,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,119,522
<BONDS>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                    6,550,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  4,618,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               13,172,144
<SALES>                                                    20,460,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           20,460,959
<CGS>                                                      14,701,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              14,701,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            4,430,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             1,355,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  539,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           816,087
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  816,087
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     .27



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30568]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that RiverVest Venture Fund I, L.P. (the 
Fund), 7701 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 740, St. Louis, Missouri 63105, 
has filed a License Application under the Small Business Investment Act 
of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in connection with the financing of 
a small concern, have sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act 
and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest 
of the Small Business Administration (``SBA'') rules and regulations 
(13 CFR 107.730 (2000)). The Fund proposes to provide equity financing 
to TissueLink Medical, Inc. (``TissueLink''), One Washington Center, 
Suite 400, Dover, New Hampshire 03820. The financing is contemplated 
for working capital or inventory purchase, marketing activities, and 
research and development.
    The financing is brought within the purview of section 
107.730(a)(1) of the regulations because Jay W. Schmelter and Crescendo 
Ventures (``Crescendo''), Associates of the Fund, currently own, 
directly or indirectly, greater than 10% of TissueLink and therefore 
TissueLink is considered an Associate of Jay W. Schmelter and Crescendo 
as defined in section 107.50 of the regulations. (Mr. Schmelter because 
he is a Control Person of the Fund, and Crescendo Ventures because Mr. 
Schmelter was formerly a member of the general partner of Crescendo 
within six months of the date of the subject financing.)
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: November 21, 2000.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 00-30568 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C,  Ltd., was in the process of liquidation as
of December 31, 1997 and as such is governed by  liquidation  basis  accounting.
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd.'s Statement of Net Assets in Process of Liquidation
and  Statement  of Changes in Net Assets in Process of  Liquidation  in its Form
10-K for the year ended  December  31, 1997 and is  qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         261,975
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  230,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               492,802
<PP&E>                                         988,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,481,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          63,261
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   63,261
<SALES>                                        21,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,148<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses and production taxes. Excludes general and
administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Anderson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered September 20, 1988, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of two to four years’ imprisonment for grand larceny in the fourth degree and a definite term of one-year imprisonment for criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree.

Ordered that so much of the appeal as is from the sentence imposed upon the conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as reviewed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we discern no error in the trial court’s limitation of cross-examination with respect to a prosecution witness. It is firmly established that the degree of control to be exercised over the nature and extent of cross-examination is a matter addressed to the sound and broad discretion of the trial court *(see, People v Schwartzman,*24 NY2d 241, *cert denied*396 US 846; *People v Boyajian,*148 AD2d 740). Inasmuch as the matters which the defendant’s *625trial counsel sought to further explore on cross-examination in this case were largely collateral and had already been adequately covered, it cannot be said that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in precluding additional questioning with regard to these matters *(see, e.g., People v Boyajian, supra).*In any event, even if it were assumed that the court’s rulings were erroneous, the error would be harmless in view of the strong evidence of the defendant’s guilt and the limited relevance of the testimony provided by the witness with regard to whom further cross-examination was sought *(cf., People v Mills,*146 AD2d 810; *People v Scoon,*130 AD2d 597).

The defendant’s challenge to the sentence imposed on his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, which term was made to run concurrently with the greater sentence he received on his conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree, has been rendered academic by reason of the fact that he has already fully served the challenged sentence *(see, People v Reyes,*74 NY2d 837). Accordingly, so much of his appeal as concerns the propriety of that sentence is dismissed. Eiber, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### HALL v. STATE.

No. 20199.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1939.

H. R. Rolston, of Lufkin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

This is a case involving a violation of the liquor laws of this State, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq., and upon a. conviction for a violation thereof appellant was fined $150.

Bill of .exceptions No. 3 evidences error that will cause a reversal of this case. It relates to the introduction before the jury of the affidavit fór a warrant to search the premises where a- quantity of liquor was found, as well as the warrant authorizing such search, both of which instruments were introduced in evidence and read before the jury trying the case. We have heretofore held in numerous instances that such testimony was hearsay and not admissible before the jury, but should be introduced, if at all, before the court only for the purpose of determining the legality of the search, if such a question is presented. See Cropper v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 391, 111 S.W. 2d 709; White v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 338, 45 S.W.2d 225; Uptmore v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 181, 32 S.W.2d 474; Antner v. State, 114 Tex.Cr.R. 248, 25 S.W.2d 860; Gunter v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 408, 4 S.W.2d 978; Seay v. State, 134 Tex. Cr.R. 255, 115 S.W.2d 418.

We also note that the testimony does not show with convincing clarity what connection, if any, that the appellant had with the Speedway Night Club, other than that he had been seen in such place behind the counter a few times. We also note that the location of the place to be searched was set forth in the affidavit and search warrant as 217 Herndon Street in the city of Lufkin, Texas, and that the testimony of the sheriff who executed the warrant shows such place to have been No. 217 Harrison Street in said city. We call attention to these discrepancies in order that they might be corrected if possible in the event of another trial hereof.

The appellant also contends that the search warrant is based on informa*294tion and belief, and should have, been held invalid by the trial court, because the same shows upon its face to have been thus based. The affidavit for such warrant shows that same was made because “They have received on this date, May 28, 1938, reliable information from trustworthy citizens of Angelina County, Texas, this illicit liquor is now being kept and stored at the above described premises in violation of the law.” It seems to us that such an affidavit, based upon the above information, is based upon probable cause, and a search warrant issued thereunder would be a reasonable one.

However ■ for the errors discussed, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  **FAA -**  **2015 -**  **1008** ☐ These comments are in **Directorate ID: 2013**  **- SW** **- 064**  **- AD**  response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** ☒ FRAN ☐ SNPRM 

### ☒ N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is ch ecked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued?

If yes, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new n otice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. 

### Latest Revision
. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discus**  **sed together.** Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : 

### Choose one . If other, explain : Commenter(s): 

### Click here to enter text. What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Click here to enter text. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### Click here to enter text. Do we agree? 

### Yes/No If **YES,** we agree because 

### Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### Li st any changes to the AD If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with 

### In sert text because 

### In sert justification We disagree with 

### Insert text because 

### In sert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### List any changes to the AD If **NO** , we don’t agree because 

### In sert our rationale
**ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following : 

### Choose one .

If other, explain : 

### Click here to enter text. Commenter(s): 

### Cl ick here to enter text. What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Click here to enter text. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### Click here to enter text. Do we agree? 

### Yes/No

### Page 2 of 3

If **YES,** we agree because 

### Insert justification Make the f ollowing changes to the AD: 

### Li st any changes to the AD If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with 

### In sert text because 

### In sert justification We disagree with 

### Insert text because 

### In sert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### List any changes to the A D If **NO** , we don’t agree because 

### In sert our rationale
**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, William C. Stone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2003                  By:/s/ William C. Stone

                                    William C. Stone
                                    Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.