alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1418

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the treatment

of tenant-stockholders in cooperative housing corporations also shall apply

to stockholders of corporations that only own the land on which the

residences are located.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1993

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the treatment of tenant-stockholders in cooperative

housing corporations also shall apply to stockholders of

corporations that only own the land on which the residences are located.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1418 IH

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RULES APPLICABLE TO

2 TENANT-STOCKHOLDERS OF COOPERATIVE

3 HOUSING CORPORATIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 216 of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding

6 at the end thereof the following new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(7) COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATIONS

8 OWNING OR LEASING ONLY LAND.—

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘cooperative

10 housing corporation’ includes any corporation

11 which would be a cooperative housing corpora12 tion if ‘or situated on land owned or leased by

13 the corporation’ were inserted before the

14 comma at the end of paragraph (1)(B).

15 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF WHETHER

16 STOCK IS FULLY PAID-UP.—In the case of a

17 corporation which would not be a cooperative

18 housing corporation but for subparagraph (A),

19 the determination under paragraph (2) of

20 whether the stock of any stockholder who owns

21 a house situated on land owned or leased by the

22 corporation is fully paid-up shall be based on

23 the portion of the value of the corporation’s eq24 uity in the land on which the houses are situ25 ated which is attributable to the land on which

26 such stockholder’s house is situated.
3

•HR 1418 IH

1 ‘‘(C) TRAILER PARKS EXCLUDED.—This

2 paragraph shall not apply if any house situated

3 on land owned or leased by the corporation is

4 a mobile home.’’

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

7 December 31, 1987.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Regina C., Respondent, v Roger Y., Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act *555article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Cozier, J.), dated April 3, 1989, which overruled the father’s objections to an order of the same court (Marchetti, H.E.), dated February 9, 1989, which, *inter alia,*awarded the mother $5,000 for arrears in child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contentions, the proof adduced before the Hearing Examiner was sufficient to establish the petitioner’s entitlement to arrears in the sum awarded.

We have reviewed the father’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Hooper, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Ernest Littles, Petitioner, v William S. Kirk, as Superintendent of Wallkill Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner admitted at the hearing that, although he was given a direct order to be on time for the count, he arrived after the gate was closed and after the whistle for the count had been blown. This testimony, in addition to the misbehavior report, constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated the disciplinary rules set forth in the first misbehavior report *(see, Matter of Perez v Wilmot,*67 NY2d 615, 616), and any questions of credibility were for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre,*150 AD2d 954, *lv denied*74 NY2d 615). Petitioner’s own testimony and the second misbehavior report also provide substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner was in an unauthorized location at an unauthorized time and was late for call-out *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130, 139-140). Finally, there is no merit to petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officers were not impartial *(see, Matter of Diaz v Coughlin,*143 AD2d 485).

Determinations confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60238

Conference Calendar

 

RICHARD SIMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHRISTOPHER EPPS; EDWARD HARGETT, 

SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE 

PENITENTIARY; EARL JACKSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95CV174-B-D

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Sims, Mississippi prisoner #55462, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as

frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Sims contends that

the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his claims

that the extension of his solitary confinement under a new prison

policy violated his due process rights and the Ex Post Facto

Clause. Sims’ placement in solitary confinement did not violate
No. 96-60238

- 2 -

his due process rights because it did not impose an atypical and 

significant hardship on him in relation to the ordinary incidents

of prison life. Sandin v. Conner, 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995). 

Assuming that the new prison policy which allows prison officials

to extend solitary confinement is a law within the meaning of the

Ex Post Facto Clause, the application of the policy to Sims did

not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause because it did not make his

punishment more burdensome by increasing the length of his term

of imprisonment or affecting his good-time credits. Collins v.

Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 42 (1990). 

Sims also argues that the district court failed to address

his claims that his Fifth and Eighth Amendment rights and his

Equal Protection rights were violated. The district court

considered and dismissed his claim that under the Fifth Amendment

he was entitled to notice and a hearing before the application of

the new prison policy to him. Sims’ Eighth Amendment claim lacks

merit as he has not shown that the conditions of his solitary

confinement caused more than mere discomfort or inconvenience. 

See Wilson v. Lynaugh, 878 F.2d 846, 849 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 493 U.S. 969 (1989). Sims’ equal-protection claim lacks

merit as he has not shown that he was treated differently from

similarly-situated prisoners, or that the defendants had a

discriminatory purpose for the alleged singular treatment. See

Lavernia v. Lynaugh, 845 F.2d 493, 496 (5th Cir. 1988). 

Sims’ appeal is without arguable merit and is thus
No. 96-60238

- 3 -

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Therefore his appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Public Comment received 12/08/2013 on document DOD - 2013 - OS - 0225 - 0001 ( Comment Tracking Number 1jx - 896c - b2bq ) : Changing “Grievance and Unfair Labor Practices Records. To ” “Grievance and Unfair Labor Practice Records.” denotes That A Person Can Only File One Grievance Issue At A Time. Especially If The Violation Includes Rape. It Would Clog Up Hearing Room And Create Red Tape Until the petitioner Hopefully Give Up Perusing T he Complaint.

________________________________________________________________________ OSD Response to Public Comment on DoD - 2013 - OS - 0225 - 0001 A singl e comment was received raising concern s that changes to the System of Records Notice would allow indiv iduals to submit only one grievance issue at a time “clogging up and creating red tape , ” effectively discouraging complainants. The Office of the Secretary of Defense takes allegations of sexual assaults as well as grievance and unfair labor practices ser iously . The System of Records Notice is not the mechanism to address general comments regarding otherwise established mechanisms for processing grievances and unfair labor practices. A System of Records Notice provides an affirmative notice of an Agency’ s privacy practice for a specific grouping of records protected by the Privacy Act of 1974.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Supporting Materials-- SSWG findings (RTCA DO annexes)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1462

To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to reduce the minimum

downpayment required for a mortgage on a 1- to 4-family residence

located in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, or the Virgin Islands to be eligible

for mortgage insurance under such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mrs. MINK (for herself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. DE LUGO, Mr. UNDERWOOD,

and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to reduce

the minimum downpayment required for a mortgage on

a 1- to 4-family residence located in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, or the Virgin Islands to be eligible for mortgage

insurance under such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 203(b)(2)(B)(iii) of the National Housing

4 Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(2)(B)(iii)) is amended by insert5 ing after ‘‘(iii)’’ the following: ‘‘in the case of a property

6 located (I) in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, or the Virgin Is-
2

•HR 1462 IH

1 lands, 95 percent of such value in excess of $125,000, and

2 (II) in any other State,’’ .

Æ
Docket: EPA-R02-OAR-2014-0251

Rescission of Determination of Attainment and Call for Attainment Plans for New York, New Jersey and Connecticut 

for the 1997 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the NY-NJ-CT 1997 Ozone Nonattainment Area

Comment On: EPA-R02-OAR-2014-0251-0001

Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut; 

Rescission of Determination of Attainment and Call for Attainment Plans

Document: EPA-R02-OAR-2014-0251-0002

Comment on EPA-R02-OAR-2014-0251-0001

Submitter Information

General Comment

Based on the 2011-2013 design values in Table 1 of the proposed rule, it appears that only monitors in Connecticut had 

design values in exceedence of the standard. Can the EPA explain why large portions of New York and New Jersey 

should be considered to no longer be in attainment with the NAAQS despite all monitor design values in these states 

being below the 0.085 threshold? 

I recognize that air pollution obviously does not respect state borders, but some areas in the northern NJ non-attainment 

area are over 100 miles from where the CT design values are showing non-attainment. It is not clear that the 

designation of a major intrastate area is still "necessary and appropriate" for the attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

standards.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 4/8/16 8:22 AM

Received: May 15, 2014

Status: Posted

Posted: May 16, 2014

Tracking No. 1jy-8c3u-shpg

Comments Due: June 16, 2014

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/886810606... 4/11/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1302 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1302

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish the position of 
Director of Physician Assistant Services within the office of the Under 
               Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2009

  Mr. Hare (for himself, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Buyer, Mr. 
Filner, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Holden, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Moran of Kansas, and 
Mr. Rodriguez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish the position of 
Director of Physician Assistant Services within the office of the Under 
               Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF DIRECTOR OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SERVICES AT 
              VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7306(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by striking paragraph (9) and inserting the following new 
paragraph (9):
            ``(9) The Director of Physician Assistant Services, who 
        shall serve in a full-time capacity at the Central Office of 
        the Department and who shall be a qualified physician assistant 
        who shall be responsible to and report directly to the Under 
        Secretary for Health on all matters relating to the education 
        and training, employment, appropriate utilization, and optimal 
        participation of physician assistants within the programs and 
        initiatives of the Administration.''.
    (b) Deadline for Implementation.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall ensure that an individual is serving as the Director of Physician 
Assistant Services under section 7306(a)(9) of title 38, United States 
Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 120 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNKNOWN HEIRS of F. H. HOLLOWAY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. I. H. ELLINGTON et al., Defendants in Error.

No. 1781—7285.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

July 26, 1939.

Llewllyn & Dougherty, of Liberty, for plaintiffs in error.

F. T. Baldwin, of Houston, and P. C. Matthews, of Liberty, for defendants in_ error.

TAYLOR, Commissioner.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case appears in KM S.W.2d 650. The facts and the controlling question involved are the same as in Unknown Heirs of Holloway et al. v. L. B. Whatley et al., Tex.Com.App., 131 S.W.2d 89, this day decided.

On the authority of that case, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming that of the trial court, is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC31 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Torchlight Loan Services, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.; and Situs Holdings, LLC.



Date:	March 31, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

CGCMT 2015-GC31 Certifications

---
Case 4:22-cr-00318-O Document 25 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 46
Case 4:22-cr-00318-O Document 25 Filed 06/16/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 47
----

Exhibit 32.1 

**Principal Executive Officer’s CertificationPursuant To Section 1350**
In connection with the Annual Report of American Natural Energy Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,Michael K. Paulk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

/s/ Michael K. Paulk 

Michael K. Paulk Chief Executive Officer April 27, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,299
<SECURITIES>                                    43,344
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,697
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,927
<PP&E>                                          14,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,255
<SALES>                                         19,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,447
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                       492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services****MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380** |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C29

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# Euroopan unionin C 39A/7. h

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 39A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 60. vuosikerta7. helmikuu 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 39A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

60. vuosikerta7. helmikuu 2017

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan komissio |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | Yhteisön kasvilajikevirasto — Valituslautakunnan puheenjohtajuutta koskeva kiinnostuksenilmaisupyyntö (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan komissio

2017/C 39 A/01

Yhteisön kasvilajikevirasto — Valituslautakunnan puheenjohtajuutta koskeva kiinnostuksenilmaisupyyntö (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan komissio

| 7.2.2017 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 39/1

---

YHTEISÖN KASVILAJIKEVIRASTO

Valituslautakunnan puheenjohtajuutta koskeva kiinnostuksenilmaisupyyntö

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

Yhteisön kasvilajikevirasto etsii valituslautakuntaansa puheenjohtajaa.

Hakijan on oltava jonkin Euroopan unionin jäsenvaltion kansalainen.

Neuvosto nimittää viraston puheenjohtajan ehdokaslistan perusteella, jonka komissio esittää saatuaan viraston hallintoneuvoston lausunnon. Tietoja tehtävästä maksettavasta korvauksesta voi pyytää valituslautakunnan sihteeristöltä (Community Plant Variety Office, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). Yhteisön kasvilajikevirasto ja komissio noudattavat henkilöstöpolitiikassaan tasa-arvoperiaatetta.

Kiinnostuksenilmaisupyynnön koko teksti ja linkki sähköiseen hakemuslomakkeeseen ovat saatavilla osoitteessa https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

Hakemuksia otetaan vastaan 8. maaliskuuta 2017 saakka (ks. tarkemmat tiedot hakuohjeista).

---