alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted April 30, 2020*

Decided April 30, 2020

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

No. 18-3198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

PAUL A. HEINRICH, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

No. 03-cv-75-jdp

James D. Peterson,

Chief Judge.

O R D E R

Over 15 years ago, the district court enjoined Heinrich to comply with a federal 

environmental order. Heinrich had built a road across wetlands on his property, 

violating the Clean Water Act. He did not comply with the Environmental Protection 

Agency’s order to restore the land, so the United States sued to enforce that order. The 

district court permanently enjoined Heinrich to restore the wetlands, and we affirmed. 

United States v. Heinrich, 184 Fed App’x 542 (7th Cir. 2006). In 2018 Heinrich moved to 

reconsider the injunction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). He argued

∗ We have agreed to decide the case without oral argument because the appeal is 

frivolous. FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(A). 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 18-3198 Page 2

primarily that the district judge was prejudiced towards lawyers (like him) and this

prejudice prevented him from presenting a defense.

The district court denied Heinrich’s Rule 60(b) motion as untimely and meritless. 

It explained that Rule 60(b) movants must file either one year after judgment or within a 

reasonable time, depending on the grounds asserted. Heinrich did neither. Moreover,

the court explained, he should have raised his assertions of prejudice on direct appeal.

See Banks v. Chicago Bd. of Educ., 750 F.3d 663, 667 (7th Cir. 2014). 

On appeal Heinrich frivolously argues that the district court wrongly denied his 

Rule 60(b) motion. He complains that the court cited no precedent and that his case 

warrants relief under Rule 60(b)(6) because it is complex and the district judge was

vindictive against lawyers. But the district court had robust grounds for denying 

Heinrich’s post-judgment motion. The timeliness of a Rule 60(b)(6) motion depends, in 

part, on the proffered reason for the delay. Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 795 F.2d 601,

609–10 (7th Cir. 1986). Heinrich presented no justification for his 15-year delay in filing 

his motion. Nor did he explain, as he must, see id. at 606–07, why he was unable to raise 

on direct appeal the main argument that he presents in his motion—the supposed 

prejudice of the district judge. These omissions, coupled with the strong interest in 

finality, required the denial of this motion. See id. at 610. 

We have reviewed Heinrich’s remaining arguments, and none has merit. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75888-75889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30851]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

25 CFR Part 580

[RIN 3141-AA04]


Environment, Public Health and Safety

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule: Notice of extension of time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 24, 2000, the National Indian Gaming Commission 
(Commission) issued a Proposed Rule (65 FR 45558, July 24, 2000) 
promulgating draft regulations to provide for adequate protection of 
the environment, public health and safety under the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (Act). The date for filing comments is being extended.

DATES: Comments shall be filed on or before January 19, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Environment, Public Health and 
Safety Comments, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street, 
N.W., Suite 9100, Washington, D.C. 20005, delivered to that address 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, or faxed to 
202/632-7066 (this is not a toll-free number). Comments received may be 
inspected between 9:00 a.m. and noon, and between 2:00 p.m. and 5:00 
p.m., Monday through Friday.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Nagle at 202/632-7003; fax 
202/632-7066 (these are not toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA, or 
the Act), enacted on October 17, 1988, established the National Indian 
Gaming Commission (Commission). Under the Act, the Commission is 
charged with ensuring that tribal gaming facilities are constructed, 
maintained and operated in a manner, which adequately protects the 
environment and the public health and safety. The proposed regulations 
establish a process for carrying out this Commission responsibility. 
The Commissioners have been requested to allow additional time for 
preparation of comments on the proposed regulations. The Commission has 
determined that these regulations are of such

[[Page 75889]]

significance that interested parties should be given additional time to 
determine and present their views.

Montie R. Deer,
Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-30851 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1688 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to negotiate fair prescription drug prices 

under part D of the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2017 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARDIN, 

Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. FRANKEN, Ms. HARRIS, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KING, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MANCHIN, 

Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. UDALL, Mr. 

VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WARNER, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate 

fair prescription drug prices under part D of the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering Medicare 

5 Seniors to Negotiate Drug Prices Act of 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1688 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE FAIR PRICES FOR MEDI2 CARE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–11 of the Social 

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–111) is amended by strik5 ing subsection (i). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
(Treasury Use)

Field #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

CAT CODE LOB CODE LOC OF LOSS/ DOL - DATE OF LOSS INSURER NUMBER INSURER NAME CLAIM # INSURED NAME INSURED TIN EFF DT EXP DT WC NUMBER PRIOR

STATE CD (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY)INDICATOR OF WC CUMULATIVE

MO, MI or II CLAIMANTS LOSS PAYMENTS

Totals: NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.00

Instruction to add more lines

Control Number

TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE PROGRAM

SCHEDULE C

BORDEREAU

Insurer or Insurer Group Name:

As this spreadsheet has been constructed with formulae for data fields that need to be totaled, please insert any additional data 

records (rows) before (above) the “Totals” row.

Notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act

We estimate it will take you about 4 hours to complete this form. However, you are not required to 

provide the information requested unless a valid OMB control number is displayed on the form. Any 

comments or suggestions regarding this form should be sent to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program 

Office, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 1410 MT, Washington, DC 

20220. Do not send completed forms to this address. Submit forms according to instructions provided 

at https://trip.treasury.gov/TRIP/welcome.

NAIC Insurer (or Group) Number:

TIN (if no NAIC #):

Calendar Year:

Data as of: 

Page 1 OMB No. 1505-0200 (Exp.: 1/31/2027)

TRIP 02C Schedule C
(Treasury Use)

15a. 15b. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

CURRENT LOSS CURRENT LOSS TOTAL PUNITIVE ALAE PAID SALV SUBRO SALV/SUBRO REINS DUPLICATE FEDERAL AMT ONE OF SOURCE ONE OF AMT TWO OF 

PAYMENT INFORMATION PAYMENT INFORMATION CUMULATIVE DMG PD RECOVRD RECOVRD RECOVRD RECVRBLE? COMP DUPLI FED COMP FED COMP DUPLI FED COMP

a. LOSS PAID AMOUNT b. LOSS TO BE PAID AMOUNT LOSS PAYMENTS Y or N Y, P or N

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 0.00

Control Number:

Page 2 OMB No. 1505-0200 (Exp.: 1/31/2027)

TRIP 02C Schedule C
(Treasury Use)

27 28 29 30 31 32 33

SOURCE TWO OF THIRD PARTY CLAIM RESERVES DATE OF SETTLEMENT TOTAL

FED COMP INDICATOR STATUS LATEST DOCUMENTATION UNPRORATED

Y or N O,C or R PAYMENT DATE LOSS AMOUNT

(MM/DD/YYYY (MM/DD/YYYY)

NA NA NA 0.00 NA NA 0.00

Control Number:

Page 3 OMB No. 1505-0200 (Exp.: 1/31/2027)

TRIP 02C Schedule C
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

s0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140453 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140453 

 COA: 294390 

Macomb CC: 1998-001803-FH 

JAMES HARRY KLEIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 6, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 167 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 167

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 22, 2017

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate a National Memorial to Fallen Educators at the National 
               Teachers Hall of Fame in Emporia, Kansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Memorial to Fallen 
Educators Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--The memorial to fallen educators located at the 
National Teachers Hall of Fame in Emporia, Kansas, is designated as the 
``National Memorial to Fallen Educators''.
    (b) Effect of Designation.--The national memorial designated by 
this section is not a unit of the National Park System and the 
designation of the National Memorial to Fallen Educators shall not 
require or permit Federal funds to be expended for any purpose related 
to that national memorial.

            Passed the Senate December 21, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WAIVER AND CONSENT 
  
 This Employment Agreement Waiver and Consent (this “Waiver”) is given as of May 2, 2005 in reference to the Employment Agreement, dated as of
July 7, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”) by and between American Coin Merchandising, Inc. (“Employer”) a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Coinstar, Inc. (“Coinstar”), and Randall J. Fagundo
(“Employee”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 A. The Employer is contemplating entering into a transaction whereby Sesame
Holdings, Inc. (“Sesame”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Coinstar will be merged into Employer, with Employer being the surviving entity (the “Reorganization”). 
  
 B. Section 1.3 of the Employment Agreement provides that certain rights and obligations of the parties will be impacted in
the event that the Employer experiences a “Change of Control,” as defined in the Employment Agreement. 
  
 C. Employee and Employer agree that the Reorganization does not constitute a Change of Control under the Employment Agreement and are executing this
Waiver out of an abundance of caution to ensure that the Reorganization is not, and will not be deemed to be, a Change in Control within the meaning of the Employment Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree
as follows: 
  
 WAIVER AND CONSENT 
  
 1. Employee, by this Waiver, hereby expressly acknowledges and confirms that
the Reorganization, as described above, will not constitute a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Employment Agreement), and therefore, notwithstanding the consummation by the Employer of the Reorganization, Employee will remain liable
to the Employer for the Repayment Obligation. 
  
 2. By execution
of this Waiver, Employee consents to the Reorganization to the extent any such consent is necessary. Employee will not make any assertion that Employee is not liable to the Employer for the Repayment Obligation as a result of the Reorganization.

  
 3. Employee and his successors and assigns irrevocably and
unconditionally waive and release the Employer from any and all claims Employee may have against Employer that the Reorganization is a Change of Control and therefore that the Employee is no longer liable for the Repayment Obligation as a result of
the Reorganization. 
  









 4. Nothing in this Waiver will affect the application of the Change of Control definition in the
Employment Agreement to any transaction other than the Reorganization. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Amendment as of the date first set forth above. 
  

									
	Employee	 	 	 	Employer
	 Randall J. Fagundo
	 	 	 	 American Coin Merchandising, Inc

				
	 /s/ RANDALL J. FAGUNDO
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ DONALD R. RENCH

				
	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	 Secretary


  

 -2-
MAG Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee

December 4, 2014

2013 Unpaved Roads Inventory for the 

Maricopa County PM-10 Nonattainment Area
Background

 MAG Regional Council - On May 23, 2007, the MAG 

Regional Council approved additional items for the 

Suggested List of Measures to Reduce PM-10. One of 

these measures was that MAG would develop an 

unpaved roads inventory for the PM-10 

Nonattainment Area.

 Primary Use of Inventory - The unpaved roads 

inventory will be used to measure progress in 

eliminating unpaved roads. 

 Initial Inventory – Initial unpaved roads inventory 

was completed in November 2009.
Year 2013 

Unpaved Roads 

Data from MAG 

Member Agencies

MAG CMAQ 

and TIP Paving 

Data for Year 

2013

Analysis of Aerial Imagery to Identify Changes to Unpaved Roads. 

Draft Maps Developed by MAG GIS staff.

Preliminary 2013 Unpaved Roads Inventory

(updated by MAG GIS staff)

Additional Unpaved Roads Data Received from 

MAG Member Agencies after Review of Draft Maps.

2013 Unpaved Roads Inventory

(updated by MAG GIS staff)
Unpaved Roads Not Included in 

Inventory

 Alleys

 Agricultural Roads

 Canal Roads

 Closed Unpaved Roads

 Easements 

 Restricted Access Roads

 Utility Roads
Year 2013 Unpaved Roads Summary 

 Public Unpaved Roads (miles)

• Nonattainment Area Total = 381 

• Cities & Towns = 119

• Maricopa County – Unincorp. = 52 

• Pinal County – Unincorp. = 9

• Federal Land = 162

• Tribal Communities/Nations = 39

 Private Unpaved Roads (miles)

• Nonattainment Area Total = 998

• Cities & Towns = 185

• Maricopa County – Unincorp. = 740 

• Pinal County – Unincorp. = 23

• Federal Land = 5

•Tribal Communities/Nations = 45

 Total Unpaved Roads (miles) = 1,379
Change in Unpaved Roads 

(November 2009 – December 2013)

 Public Unpaved Roads

• Decrease of 232 miles

• Paving of public unpaved roads.

• Closing of public unpaved roads.

• Reclassification of public unpaved roads

 (e.g., actually private).

• Blockage of public unpaved roads.

 Private Unpaved Roads

• Decrease of 273 miles

• Paving of private unpaved roads.

• Reclassification of private unpaved roads (e.g., 

some farm roads and canal roads had been 

classified as private unpaved roads).
Regional Map Showing Public Unpaved Roads

This image cannot currently be displayed.
Regional Map Showing Private Unpaved Roads

This image cannot currently be displayed.
For more information

Contact: 

Randy Sedlacek

(602) 254-6300

rsedlacek@azmag.gov

This image cannot currently be displayed. This image cannot currently be displayed. This image cannot currently be displayed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1523 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1523

To limit the duration of payments of expenses of former Speakers of the 
                       House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 1993

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To limit the duration of payments of expenses of former Speakers of the 
                       House of Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON THE DURATION OF PAYMENTS OF EXPENSES OF FORMER 
              SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

    The period for which expenses of former Speakers of the House of 
Representatives may be paid shall end 1 year after the date of the 
expiration of the term of office as Representative of the former 
Speaker involved, except that, in the case of a former Speaker who is 
receiving such expenses on the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
period shall end 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``expenses of former Speakers of 
the House of Representatives'' means the office, allowance, and other 
expenses provided for former Speakers of the House of Representatives 
under House Resolution 1238, Ninety-first Congress, enacted into 
permanent law by chapter VIII of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 31b-1 et seq.).

                                 <all>
```
February 22, 2011

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25466

Mr. Robert Kneisley

Southwest Airlines

1901 L Street NW., Suite 640 Washington, DC 20036

Dear Mr. Kneisley:

On September 26, 2008, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Southwest Airlines (Southwest) an exemption from § 121.391(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). Exemption No. 9382A allowed Southwest to substitute a qualified crewmember for one required flight attendant crewmember during boarding at all stops and to reduce the number of required flight attendants on board during the deplaning of passengers at all stops, subject to certain conditions and limitations. This exemption terminated on September 30, 2010.

On the date the exemption was scheduled to terminate, the FAA was actively engaged in rulemaking regarding revisions to crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard an airplane. The FAA found it appropriate to extend the exemption while rulemaking efforts were completed. Therefore, in a letter dated September 24, 2010, the FAA extended the termination date of Exemption No. 9382A to September 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded

or rescinded.

On November 5, 2010, the FAA published a final rule (Crewmember Requirements When Passengers are Onboard) regarding crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard an airplane, which became effective January 4, 2011 (75 FR 68189) (copy enclosed). The final rule substantially addresses the relief granted in Exemption No. 9382A. Therefore, the FAA is rescinding Exemption No. 9382B on April 29, 2011.2

A copy of this letter will be placed onto the docket (Docket No. FAA-2006-25466).

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 71058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30446]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD11-00-016]
RIN 2115-AE46


Special Local Regulations: San Diego Christmas Boat Parade of 
Lights

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice implements 33 CFR 100.1101, Southern California 
annual marine events, for the San Diego Christmas Boat Parade of 
Lights. The event will consist of private vessels approximately 10 to 
60 feet in length with Christmas lights formed in a parade through the 
San Diego Harbor. These regulations will be effective on that portion 
of San Diego Harbor, from the northern portion of the main channel from 
Seaport Village to the Shelter Island Yacht Basin. Notice of 
Implementation of 33 CFR 100.1101 is necessary to control vessel 
traffic in the regulated areas during the event to ensure the safety of 
participants and spectators.
    Pursuant to 33 CFR 100.1101(b)(3), Commanding Officer, Coast Guard 
Activities San Diego, is designated Patrol Commander for this event; he 
has the authority to delegate this responsibility to any commissioned, 
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard.

EFFECTIVE DATES: This section is effective on December 10, 2000 from 
2:00 p.m. (PST) until 10:00 p.m. (PST) and on December 17, 2000 from 
5:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. (PST). If the event concludes prior to the 
scheduled termination date and/or time, the Coast Guard will cease 
enforcement of this section and will announce that fact via Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Petty Officer Nicole Lavorgna, U.S. 
Coast Guard MSO San Diego, San Diego, California; Telephone: (619) 683-
6495.
    Discussion of Implementation. These Special Local Regulations 
permit Coast Guard control of vessel traffic in order to ensure the 
safety of spectator and participant vessels. In accordance with the 
regulations in 33 CFR 100.1101, no persons or vessels shall block, 
anchor, or loiter in the regulated area; nor shall any person or vessel 
transit through the regulated area, or otherwise impede the transit of 
participant or official patrol vessels in the regulated area, unless 
cleared for such entry by or through an official patrol vessel acting 
on behalf of the Patrol Commander.

    Dated: November 21, 2000.
C.D. Wurster,
U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 00-30446 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P