alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 138

  To ensure equal treatment for playa lakes, prairie potholes, vernal 
   pools, pocosins, and other special wetlands under Federal wetland 
                         delineation criteria.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Combest introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
 to the Committees on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, Public Works and 
                    Transportation, and Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure equal treatment for playa lakes, prairie potholes, vernal 
   pools, pocosins, and other special wetlands under Federal wetland 
                         delineation criteria.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wetlands Delineation Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
            (1) new Federal wetland delineation criteria are currently 
        being developed to address concerns raised by the 
        implementation of the Federal Manual for Identifying and 
        Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands;
            (2) the proposed changes to the delineation criteria are 
        intended to increase the fairness of wetland determinations and 
        to reduce erroneous wetland determinations;
            (3) the proposed changes allow several categories of lands, 
        such as playas or playa lakes, prairie potholes, vernal pools, 
        and pocosins, to be held to different delineation requirements; 
        and
            (4) these different delineation requirements are 
        inequitable and unjustified.
    (b) Purposes.--It is the purpose of this Act to provide for the 
equal treatment of all lands under Federal wetland delineation 
criteria.

SEC. 3. EQUAL TREATMENT.

    (a) General Rule.--Federal wetlands delineation criteria regarding 
wetland hydrology shall apply uniformly to all areas, including areas 
that may be known as playas, playa lakes, prairie potholes, vernal 
pools, and pocosins.
    (b) Wetland Hydrology Defined.--For purposes of this section, the 
term ``wetland hydrology'' means the number of consecutive days that an 
area must be inundated or saturated with water.

SEC. 4. APPLICATION.

    This Act shall apply to wetland delineation criteria promulgated or 
adopted after January 1, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
LAWRENCE ALBERTIE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5507

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed March 2, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Adrian G. Soud , Judge

.

Lawrence Albertie, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, ROW E, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
SERVED JULY 8, 2010 

.'-lA ' I 

U.S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION i - l lu; 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JOSMANBLYTHE, 

Respondent 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SO0005 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0318 

HEARING NOTICE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing in this case will be held on July 20,2010, 

beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time at the following location: 

New Hanover County Court 

316 Princess Street 

Grand Jury Room 530 

Wilmington NC 28402 

Allow time to pass through security. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment-Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP1 OSW0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Alexei Schacht, Respondent's Counsel 

Nalven & Schacht, Attorneys at Law 

350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4022 

New York, NY 10118 

TEL: 212-616-5540 

FAX: 212-616-5543 

Yolanda Ayala Bemal, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3, YAB 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5099 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
**Exhibit10.2**

Change of ControlAgreement

The Change ofControl Agreement dated July 10 between Apex Silver Mines Limited and Deborah.Friedman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company, is in theform of the Change of Control Agreement previously filed with the Company’s Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 which is incorporated byreference hereto.  The salary and bonusmultiple for the purpose of Section 4(iii)(B) of Ms. Friedman’s agreement istwo.  The benefit period for the purposeof Sections 4(iv) and (v) of Ms. Friedman’s agreement is twenty-four months.

 

----
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 12 9 . BI J AN Z AREI AN v . FATEMEH T. Z AREI AN.

On Oct o ber 1 8 , 2 0 1 6 , Bi jan Zarei an fi l ed t h i s di rect ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al

c o u r t ’ s en t ry o f a fi n al d iv o rce d ecree an d p aren t i n g p lan

. Th e Geo rg i a Su p re m e Co u rt , h o wev er, has ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er th is di v o rce act i o n

. 1 See Ga. Co ns t

.
o f 1 9 8 3 , Art

. VI, Sec. V I, Par. III (6 ); M o r r is v. Mo r r i s , 2 8 4 Ga. 74 8 , 7 50 (2 ) ( 6 7 0 SE2 d 8 4 ) (2 0 0 8 ). Acco rd ingly , this a p p eal is h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s po s it i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 Pu rs u an t t o t h e Ap p el l at e J u ri s d i ct i o n Refo rm A c t o f 2 0 1 6 , th e Co u rt o f Ap p eal s h as ap p el lat e ju ri sd i ct io n o v er d i v o rce an d al i m o ny cas es i n wh i ch t h e n o t i ce
o f ap p eal was fi l ed o n o r aft er J an u ary 1 , 2 0 1 7

. See OCGA § 1 5 -3 -3

. 1 (a) (5 ) (co d i fy in g th e Ap p el l at e J uri sd i ct i o n Refo rm Act o f 2 0 1 6 ); Ga. L. 20 1 6 , p. 89 2 , § 6 -1 (c) (s p eci fy i n g t h e Act “ s h al l ap p l y t o cas es i n wh i ch a n o t i ce o f ap p eal o r ap p l i cat i o n t o ap p eal i s fi l ed o n o r aft er” J an u ary 1 , 2 0 1 7

. March 07, 2017

03/07/2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      33,294,341
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,967,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,242,091
<PP&E>                                       6,115,203
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,128,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,166,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,457,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,839
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,720,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,166,838
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,725,577
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,959,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             115,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                649,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                   194,912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            454,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   454,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




FIFTH AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AGREEMENT, entered into as of the 17th day of February, 2005, by and between Rural
Cellular Corporation (“RCC” or “Company”) and Richard P. Ekstrand (the “Employee”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have heretofore entered into an Employment Agreement
dated as of January 22, 1999, which was amended effective January 1, 2001, July 24, 2001, August
23, 2001, and February 27, 2003 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”), which agreement is now in
full force and effect;



     WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement provides certain protections for the Employee in the event
of a change in control of the Company; and



     WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors has determined it is appropriate, and in the best
interests of the Company and its shareholders, to modify the Employment Agreement to reinforce and
encourage the Employee’s continued attention and dedication to his assigned duties without
distraction in potentially disturbing circumstances arising from the possibility of a change in
control;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements herein contained,
the Company and the Employee agree as follows:




	     1.  	     Section 11(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety,
to read as follows:






     (b)     If the Employee satisfies the requirements set forth in paragraph (a), the
Employee shall be paid an amount equal to the sum of (A) 299% of the Employee’s
average annual base salary for the three fiscal years immediately preceding the
date of the Employee’s termination of employment plus (B) 299% of the average of
the annual bonus and/or incentive payments (excluding “pay to stay” or similar
bonuses) paid to the Employee for the three fiscal years immediately preceding the
date of the Employee’s termination of employment.




     Said amount shall be paid to the Employee in one lump sum, within five days
after the Employee’s termination of employment.




	     2.  	     Section 11 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to add the
following:






     (h)     In the event of the occurrence of a Change in Control, the Company shall
pay all premiums remaining on any long-term care insurance policy then being
provided by the Company for the benefit of the Employee and his spouse, provided
that the Employee is employed by the Company on the date of the Change in Control.



 









 






	     3.  	     Except to the extent specifically amended by this Agreement, the Employment
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.





* * *






					
	ATTEST
	 	RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION
	 
	By	/s/ Ann Newhall	 	By	/s/ Wesley E. Schultz
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Secretary	 	 	Wesley E. Schultz

Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer
	 
	WITNESS	 	 
	 
	/s/ Nancy A. Gilbertson	 		/s/ Richard P. Ekstrand
	 
	 	 	 
		 	 	 	Richard P. Ekstrand







2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-46-001]

Take notice that on November 21, 2000, Carnegie Interstate Pipeline Company (CIPCO), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an effective date of November 1, 2000:

Original Tariff Sheet No. 115A

First Revised Tariff Sheet No. 116

CIPCO states that these tendered sheets are filed in compliance with Order No. 587-L, issued in Docket No. RM96-1-014 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on June 30, 2000 and implements 18 CFR 284.(c)(ii), regarding the netting and trading of imbalances on CIPCO's system.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to                           ( print page 75685)                        the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30736  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1084 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1084

    To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a 
standard to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes 
               than the program material they accompany.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2009

Ms. Eshoo (for herself, Mr. Doyle, Mr. George Miller of California, Ms. 
 Sutton, Mr. Sires, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Bishop 
 of New York, Ms. Watson, Ms. Schwartz, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, 
  Mr. Thompson of California, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Hare, Mr. Honda, Mr. 
 Capuano, Ms. Speier, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Dicks, Mr. Crowley, 
     Ms. Lee of California, and Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a 
standard to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes 
               than the program material they accompany.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commercial Advertisement Loudness 
Mitigation Act''.

SEC. 2. RULEMAKING ON LOUD COMMERCIALS REQUIRED.

    (a) Regulation Required.--Within one year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
prescribe pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et 
seq.) a regulation that provides, in connection with any video 
programming that is broadcast or that is distributed by any 
multichannel video programming distributor, that--
            (1) advertisements accompanying such video programming 
        shall not be excessively noisy or strident;
            (2) such advertisements shall not be presented at 
        modulation levels substantially higher than the program 
        material that such advertisements accompany; and
            (3) the average maximum loudness of such advertisements 
        shall not be substantially higher than the average maximum 
        loudness of the program material that such advertisements 
        accompany.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms ``video 
programming'' and ``multichannel video programming distributor'' have 
the meanings given such terms in section 602 of Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 522).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                      TO
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

     Pursuant to RCW 23B.10.060 of the Washington Business Corporation Act, the
underdersigned corporation hereby submits the following amendments to the
corporation's Restated Articles of Incorporation.

     1.  The name of the corporation is Active Voice Corporation.

     2.  The first paragraph of Section 4.1 of the Restated Articles of
         Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

              "4.1.  The corporation shall have authority to issue sixty-two
         million (62,000,000) shares of stock in the aggregate. Such shares
         shall be divided into two classes as follows:

                     (a)  Sixty million (60,000,000) shares of common stock.

                     (b)  Two million (2,000,000) shares of preferred stock.

         The shares of said preferred class may be divided into and issued in
         series. Except to the extent that the relative rights and preferences
         of any series may be or have been designated by means of an amendment
         hereto approved by the corporation's shareholders, authority is
         vested in the Board of Directors, subject to the limitations and
         procedures prescribed by law, to divide any part or all of such
         preferred class into any number of series, to fix and determine
         relative rights and preferences of the shares of any series to be
         established, and to amend the rights and preferences of the shares
         of any series that has been established but is wholly unissued."

     1.  The date of adoption of such amendment was March 8, 2000.

     2.  Such amendment was duly approved by the corporation's shareholders
         in accordance with the provisions of RCW 23B.10.030 and RCW 23B.10.040.

DATED: March 8, 2000.

                                     Active Voice Corporation



                                     By: /s/ Jose S. David
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Jose S. David, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30617]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA 4132]

Nova Bus, Inc., Roswell, New Mexico; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on September 1, 2000, in response to a petition filed by 
the company on behalf of workers at Nova Bus, Inc., Roswell, New 
Mexico.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 20th day of November, 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-30617 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```