alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Titanium
Metals Corporation's Consolidated Financial Statements for the six months ended
June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Consolidated
Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011657
<NAME> TITANIUM METALS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,060
<INVENTORY>                                    207,334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               343,259
<PP&E>                                         420,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 886,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          201,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       348,299
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   886,324
<SALES>                                        261,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,444
<CGS>                                          235,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  235,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (589)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,389)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,389)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)



</TABLE>
#### Salomon Brothers Inc. et al, Appellants, et al., Plain*385tiffs, v West Virginia State Board of Investments et al., Respondents.

Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered on June 6, 1990 and June 7, 1990, respectively, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Harold Baer, Jr., J., with costs and with disbursements. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James J. Beyrau, Appellant, v Dominic J. Mantello, as Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People ex rel. Smith v Mantello,*167 AD2d 912). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — habeas corpus.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-51-001]

Take notice that on November 22, 2000, Crossroads Pipeline Company (Crossroads) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Original Tariff Sheet No. 76A, to be effective November 1, 2000.

Crossroads states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the requirements of the order issued on November 9, 2000, in Docket No. RP01-51-000 and Order No. 587-L with respect to the netting and trading of imbalances by shippers.

Crossroads states that copies of this filing have been sent to Crossroads' shippers and interested state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30735  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3485]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition

Determinations: ``Treasury of the Basel Cathedral''
Department: United States Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Treasury of the Basel 
Cathedral,'' imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without 
profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit 
objects The Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York, NY from on or 
about February 26, 2001 to on or about May 27, 2001 is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-30556 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, OPERATIONS, AND CHANGES IN TRUST
CAPITAL AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      14,111,291
<SECURITIES>                                54,452,767
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            73,293,535
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,293,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,228,961
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,064,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,293,535
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,047,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,753,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,753,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    37.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    37.32
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Murray Sorell, Appellant, v Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, dated July 11, 1988, which reaffirmed a prior determination discontinuing the petitioner’s employment as a probationary teacher, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated June 23, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner, a former probationary teacher in the New York City public school system, alleges in the instant proceeding that the Chancellor’s determination dated July 11, 1988, which reaffirmed a prior determination discontinuing his probationary employment, was "illegal, arbitrary and capricious”. Specifically, the petitioner alleges that an "OP-1 IB form” reviewing his probationary service, dated June 22, 1987, and countersigned by the petitioner on June 23, 1987, contained the principal’s signature following a recommendation of discontinuance of the petitioner’s probationary employment, but did not contain the authentic or authorized signature of the "responsible superintendent”, i.e., James Canfield, as required by the Board of Education’s Special Circular No. 45. Special Circular No. 45 provides, in pertinent part:

> "1. Authority to Recommend Discontinuance of Probation

> "A principal or director, *with the concurrence of the respon*
>       *454
>       *sible superintendent,*may recommend discontinuance of probationary service”.

We disagree with the petitioner’s argument.

It is true that, at a hearing conducted in June 1988, pursuant to the Board of Education’s Bylaws § 5.3.4, Superintendent Canfield acknowledged, for the first time, that his purported signature on the OP-1 IB form "look[ed] like someone else’s”, and was unauthorized. However, Superintendent Canfield also testified that in a letter to the petitioner, dated June 12, 1987, he negatively evaluated the petitioner. Canfield’s negative evaluation letter, which was countersigned by the petitioner on June 26, 1987, and admitted into evidence at the hearing, also stated: "I will support your principal’s rating of your service during the past year”.

Under these circumstances, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was deprived of any substantial right *(cf., Matter of Lehman v Board of Educ.,*82 AD2d 832). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Titanium  Metals  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
we, J. Landis  Martin,  Chairman  of the Board,  President  and Chief  Executive
Officer of the  Company,  and Bruce P.  Inglis,  Vice  President  - Finance  and
Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
          operations of the Company




May 4, 2004


/s/ J. Landis Martin
--------------------------------
J. Landis Martin
Chairman of the Board, President
   and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Bruce P. Inglis
-------------------------------------------------
Bruce P. Inglis
Vice President - Finance and Corporate Controller




Note:The  certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
     "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
     as  amended,  or  otherwise  subject to the  liabilities  of that  Section.
     Registration  Statements or other  documents  filed with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except
     as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
Indy	Drone	DJI	Phantom	3	Maintenance	Log Tail	#N771JD Page: 1 of 1 Date Discrepancy Corrective	Action 10/2/15 Left	Rear	Propeller	cracked R&R	propeller,	ops	check	good 10/8/15 Firmware	version	1.4.1	required
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

September 30, 2019

2019 PREEMPTION REPORT

FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE

The Federal Insurance Office (FIO) issues this report on actions taken regarding preemption of 

inconsistent state insurance measures, pursuant to the Federal Insurance Office Act of 2010. 31 

U.S.C. § 313(f), (n)(l).

During the year ending September 30, 2019, FIO did not take any action regarding the preemption 

of any inconsistent state insurance measure.
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1429

For the relief of Charlotte S. Neal.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1993

Mr. BLILEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Charlotte S. Neal.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELECTION TO PROVIDE ANNUITY.

4 For purposes of determining the eligibility of Char5 lotte S. Neal, of Lynchburg, Virginia, former spouse of

6 the late Lieutenant Commander Michael D. Christian,

7 United States Navy retired, to an annuity under the Sur8 vivor Benefit Plan, Lieutenant Commander Christian shall

9 be deemed to have made an election under section

10 1448(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, to provide an

11 annuity to Charlotte S. Neal in accordance with the sepa12 ration agreement incorporated into their divorce decree of
2

HR 1429 IH

1 August 19, 1983. Such election shall be deemed to have

2 been made as of September 24, 1983, notwithstanding the

3 death of Lieutenant Commander Christian on September

4 4, 1983.

5 SEC. 2. LUMP SUM PAYMENT.

6 The Secretary of Navy shall pay in a lump sum to

7 Charlotte S. Neal the aggregate amount to which she is

8 entitled by reason of section 1 for the period beginning

9 on October 1, 1983, and ending on the last day of the

10 month in which this Act is enacted.

11 SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

12 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘Survivor Benefit

13 Plan’’ means the program provided under subchapter II

14 of chapter 73 of title 10, United States Code.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 153 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend to the principal 

campaign committee of any candidate for elective public office the same 

graduated tax rates which apply to the principal campaign committee 

of a candidate for Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 1993 

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

to the principal campaign committee of any candidate 

for elective public office the same graduated tax rates 

which apply to the principal campaign committee of a 

candidate for Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF GRADUATED TAX RATES TO 

4 ALL PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

6 527(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 

7 principal campaign committee) is amended by striking ‘‘a 


rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 153 IH 

1 candidate for Congress’’ and all that follows and inserting 

2 ‘‘a candidate for any Federal, State, or local elective public 

3 office as his principal campaign committee for purposes 

4 of this subsection. A committee may not be designated by 

5 a candidate for purposes of this subsection if such can6 didate designates a different committee as his principal 

7 campaign committee for purposes of section 302(e) of the 

8 Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

9 432(e)).’’ 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 1992. 

Æ 


rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30414]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before December 29, 2000. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.

COPIES: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Notice to New SBA Borrowers.
    No.: 793.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: Companies are required to keep records 
in order for SBA to determine the compliance status of the recipient.
    Annual Responses: 26,420.
    Annual Burden: 6,044.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 00-30414 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
#### REPUBLIC BUILDING & LOAN ASS’N v. LUFKIN.

No. 7199; Motion No. 13903.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 19, 1939.

For former opinion, see 124 S.W.2d 979.

J. C. Muse, Jr., of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.

Cecil L. Simpson, of Dallas, for defendant in error.

*168CRITZ, Justice.

The above numbered and entitled cause is before us on motion for rehearing filed, by Republic Building & Loan Association.

The Association says that we were in error in our original opinion in stating that W. W. Lufkin became an investing stockholder in 1930. We acknowledge the error. Lufkin became a stockholder about December 31, 1926. .The date is immaterial.

The Association says that we were in error in the following statement contained in our original opinion, 124 S.W.2d 979, 980: “The certificates 'so purchased by Frazier were cancelled on the books of the Association at one hundred cents on the dollar of their withdrawal value, and he, Frazier, took secured notes belonging to the Association of the same aggregate, or equivalent, value as the withdrawal value of the stock cancelled.”

We think the above statement is legally correct. The motion for rehearing, in effect, admits that the stock acquired by Frazier and those acting for and with him was cancelled on the books of the Association, not in the name of Frazier, “but in the name of some other individual acting with and for him.”

The Association says that we were in error in stating in our original opinion that W. W. Frazier chartered General Bond and Mortgage Company. It is immaterial in whose name such concern was actually chartered. It was used and controlled by Frazier and those acting with him for the purposes stated by us in our original opinion.

The Association says that it did not recover back all the assets that Frazier abstracted from it. We did not say that such was the case. The Association recovered back the notes, or notes which we think, in law, represented their equivalent, which it parted with in consideration of the cancellation of Lufkin’s stock.

The Association says that we were in error in stating, in effect, that Lufkin’s stock was ordered restored on its books charged with $664.92 expenses incurred by the Association in making such recovery. We may have been in error in using the word, “expenses.” That is immaterial. The Lufkin stock was ordered restored on the books of the Association charged with $664.92. This was the sum proper and necessary to be so charged in order to save the Association from loss in restoring such Lufkin stock on its books.

The final result of the judgment entered by the Court of Civil Appeals in this case was to restore W. W. Lufkin’s stock on the books of this Association, charged with a sufficient sum to save the Association from loss in the Lufkin transaction. It is our opinion that, under the facts and circumstances of this record, such judgment is proper and equitable.

The motion for rehearing filed herein by the Association is in all things overruled.