alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant To


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Deep Well Oil & Gas, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Dr. Horst A. Schmid, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
July 24, 2014By:
/s/ Horst A. SchmidDr. Horst A. SchmidPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,285
<SECURITIES>                                     4,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (445)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,060
<PP&E>                                           9,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,553)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,801
<SALES>                                         20,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,516
<CGS>                                           10,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           12
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
<FN>
<F1> RESTATED - SEE NOTE 7 TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importation of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By notice dated August 8, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 23, 2000 (65 FR 51331), Calbiochem-Novabiochem 
Corporation, 10394 Pacific Center Court, Attn: Receiving Inspector, San 
Diego, California 92121-4340, made application by renewal to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Mescaline (7381)...........................  I
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Phenylaceton (8501)........................  II
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to import small quantities of the listed controlled 
substances to make reagents for distribution to the biomedical research 
community.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corporation 
is consistent with the public interest and with United States 
obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in 
effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Calbiochem-
Novabiochem Corporation on a regular basis to ensure that the company's 
continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These 
investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, audits of the company's records, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substance Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with the Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, 
Sec. 1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of 
the basic classes of controlled substances listed above.

    Dated: November 20, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Division Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-30939 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          29,941
<SECURITIES>                                    33,977
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                       233
<INVENTORY>                                      1,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,479
<PP&E>                                           1,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                     384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,242
<BONDS>                                            905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,733
<SALES>                                         16,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,267
<CGS>                                            5,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,022)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,022)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3070]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board; Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Impact of DoD 
Acquisition Policies and Practices on the Health and Competitiveness of 
U.S. Defense Companies will meet in closed session on February 22, 
2000; March 7, 2000; and tentatively on March 21-22, 2000; April 5-7, 
2000; and April 20-21, 2000. All meetings will be held at TRW Inc., 
1001 19th Street North, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22209.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition. 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Task Force will review the Department of Defense's 
acquisition policies and regulations governing the primary vendors of 
military equipment; determine whether these acquisition policies, 
processes and regulations have supported or weakened rational and 
economical business practices within the primary vendors of military 
equipment; and assess the impact of those policies, practices and 
regulations on the health and competitiveness of U.S. defense 
companies. The Task Force plans to hold sensitive programmatic 
discussions with the primary vendors during the course of this effort.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c) (1) and (4) (1994), and that 
accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: February 4, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-3070 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1469

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to use the facilities of the Golden

Gate National Recreation Area to develop and implement a program

to use drought resistant species of plants in the landscaping of public

lands.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Ms. PELOSI (for herself and Mr. MILLER of California) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to use the facilities

of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to develop

and implement a program to use drought resistant species of plants in the landscaping of public lands.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE PROJECT TO USE

4 DROUGHT RESISTANT PLANT SPECIES IN

5 CERTAIN LANDSCAPING PROJECTS.

6 The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Na7 tional Park Service and utilizing the lands and facilities

8 of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, shall estab-
2

•HR 1469 IH

1 lish a technical assistance program to assist universities

2 and nonprofit organizations in the development and imple3 mentation of projects to use drought resistant plant spe4 cies which require minimal watering and upkeep in land5 scaping applications where the use of such species will be

6 compatible with native plant species and conserve scarce

7 water resources. In selecting projects to be assisted under

8 the authority of this section, the Secretary of the Interior

9 shall give a priority to providing assistance to projects

10 which employ and provide educational training and experi11 ence for young people between the ages of 14 and 23 and

12 which will contribute to restoring the native ecology of

13 landscapes which have been affected by the introduction

14 of exotic species. There is authorized to be appropriated

15 to carry out this section such sums as may be necessary,

16 to remain available until expended.

Æ
Alias Air, Inc. 

1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Suits 875 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

RUSSELL E. POMMER 

{2021 822-9121 - T«l«phone 

12021 622-9152-Fax 

' rporr>ni«r<S>atlB9air. com 

^TiL^ENTOF 

•I ;;rERA'nc:: 

1 L J 

May 27, 2011 

Ms. Laura Remo 

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Atlas Air. Inc. Passenger Operations 

Dear Ms. Remo: 

On March 9, 2011, in Supplement No. 1 to its application for a certificate of 

public convenience and necessity authorizing it to engage in interstate charter air 

transportation of persons, property and mail. Docket OST-2009-0268, Atlas Air, Inc. 

("Atlas") informed the Department about its recent lease of a third Boeing 747 passenger . 

aircraft to be used primarily for U.S. military flying and, to a lesser extent, for 

commercial charter operations.^ To support its then-pending request for interstate 

authority, Atlas provided .standalone cost estimates for the new aircraft as well as updated 

fitness information. The Department grante.d the application in Order 2011-5-18. 

This is to advise that Atlas intended Supplement No. 1 to constitute its 45-day 

notice of intent to operate more than two passenger aircraft, independently required by 

Ordering Paragraph 2 of Order 2010-5-27. As the Department recently found in Order 

2011-5-18 on the basis of the information provided in Supplement No. 1, Atlas is fit, 

willing and able to operate the three passenger aircraft (in addition to the all-cargo 

aircraft in its fleet). Since filing Supplement No. 1, Atlas has not undergone any material 

changes in areas affecting its fitness or U.S. citizenship. Atlas continues to be fit, willing 

and able to engage in interstate and foreign air transportation, and it continues to be a 

United States citizen.^ 

^ In Order 2011-5-18 at 2, the Department erroneously suggested that Atlas intends to use its two initial 

B747 passenger aircraft for its domestic military passenger flying. Those aircraft have been and will 

remain dedicated to the Houston Express charter service, with occasional use for commercial charters uuder 

Part 212. 

^ Notably, unlike new entrants typically subject to numerical aircraft fleet size restrictions. Atlas is a wellestablished airline, with 28 Boeing 747 wide-body aircraft currently oh its FAA-issued operations 

specifications. AsofMarch3I,20n, its parent, Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., held casli, cash 

equivalents and short-term investments of $584.4 million. From a DOT fitness standpoint, Atlas' 

passenger and cargo operations should be considered indistinct 
Ms. Laura Remo 

May 27, 2011 

Page 2 

Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. 

Very truly yours^'^'' ~) 

Russell E, Pommer 

Associate General Counsel and 

Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Joseph M. MATTINGLY, Clerk, Circuit Court, St. Mary’s County, Maryland, Appellee.

No. 4501.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 18, 1940.

Bernard J. Flynn, U. S. Atty., and G. Randolph Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Baltimore, Md., Thomas G. Carney and Thomas L. McKevitt, Jr., Attys., Department of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

William C. Walsh, Atty. Gen., and William L. Henderson, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Case dismissed under Rule 23 in accordance with agreement of counsel.
IA 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 5 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal 

the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation 

on the number of terms an individual may serve as President. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, 

thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms 

an individual may serve as President. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 5 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘The twenty-second article of amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Quarterly Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Woods, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
November 10, 2010

By:

/s/ JOHN F. WOODS John F. Woods Chief Financial Officer


---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70910-70911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for licenses as 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
D.C. 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary Applicants

Cargo Freight Services, Ltd., 1740-A Phenix Parkway, College Park, GA 
30349, Officers: Hong Wing Lee, Secretary, (Qualifying Individual), 
Chun Shing Ip, President
ENR Logistics, 555 W. Redondo Beach Blvd., #203, Gardena, CA 90248, 
Myung Kook Lee, Sole Proprietor
Southern Logistic Service, 8735 Bellanca Avenue, Unit #B, Los Angeles, 
CA 90045, Namgene Paik, Sole Proprietor
Cargocare Logistics, Ltd., 34 Harvest Lane, Burlington, NJ 08016, 
Officer: Gary R. Yetter, President, (Qualifying Individual)

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants

Supplies & Global Logistics, Inc., 3300 S. Gessner, Suite 120, Houston, 
TX 77063, Officer: Ian G. Buchanan, Director of Operations, (Qualifying 
Individual)
Margaret J. Zimmer, 8 Torch Pine Court, The Woodlands, TX 77381, Sole 
Proprietor
Liner Services International, Inc., Stennis Int'l. Airport, 7248 
Stennis Airport Drive, Kiln, MS 39556, Officer: Terry D. Liner, 
President, (Qualifying Individual)


[[Page 70911]]


    Dated: November 22, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30315 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vance Suber, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered on February 9, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 Vi to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Ross, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1457 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1457

           To protect the voting rights of homeless citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1993

  Mr. Lewis of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Conyers, Mr. Owens, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Norton, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
 Oberstar, Mr. Mfume, Mr. Flake, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, Mr. 
Towns, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. Blackwell, Mr. Slattery, and Mr. Gonzalez) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To protect the voting rights of homeless citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voting Rights of Homeless Citizens 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. VOTING RIGHTS OF HOMELESS CITIZENS.

    No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, 
practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or 
political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of 
the United States to vote because that citizen resides at or in a 
nontraditional abode.

SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT.

    The Attorney General may commence in the name of the United States 
a civil action (including an action against a State or political 
subdivision) or an aggrieved citizen may institute a proceeding under 
this Act, for injunctive relief against a violation of section 2.

SEC. 4. RELATIONSHIP TO VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965.

    This Act shall not be construed to impair any right guaranteed by 
the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et seq.).

SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act, the term ``nontraditional abode'' includes--
            (1) a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter 
        designed to provide temporary living accommodations (including 
        welfare hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional housing 
        for the mentally ill); and
            (2) a public or private place not designated for, or 
        ordinarily used as, regular sleeping accommodation for human 
        beings.

SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act applies with respect to elections taking place after 
December 31, 1993.

                                 <all>
```