alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Public Hearing; The Union Pacific Railroad (Docket 
Number 2000-7912)

    The Union Pacific Railroad (UP) has petitioned the Federal Railroad 
Administration (FRA) seeking a waiver of compliance with the 
requirements of 49 CFR 214.329. UP requests relief that will permit the 
use of a system described by UP as the automatic train approach warning 
system (TAWS). UP proposes that roadway work groups be permitted to 
substitute TAWS for watchmen/lookouts as the method of train approach 
warning when fouling a track within equipped interlockings and 
controlled points. UP also proposes that lone workers be permitted to 
use TAWS as a method of train approach warning within the limits of 
those interlockings and controlled points without a requirement to 
establish working limits. Technical details of the TAWS system, its 
developmental history, and its function were described in the Federal 
Register notice cited in the following sentence.
    The FRA issued a public notice (65 FR 57237, September 21, 2000) 
seeking comments of interested parties. After examining the railroad's 
proposal and the available facts, FRA has determined that a public 
hearing is necessary before a final decision is made on this proposal.
    Accordingly, a public hearing is hereby set for 9 a.m. CST, on 
Thursday, January 4, 2001, in Room 102-A (first floor) of the Peter 
Kiewit Building, 1313 Farnam Street, Omaha, Nebraska. Interested 
parties are invited to present oral statements at the hearing.
    The hearing will be an informal one and will be conducted in 
accordance with Rule 25 of the FRA Rules of Practice (Title 49 CFR Part 
211.25), by a representative designated by the FRA.

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 21, 2000.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 00-30430 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1326 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1326

      To suspend temporarily the duty on rifabutin (dosage form).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1993

Mr. Richardson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on rifabutin (dosage form).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.14  Rifabutin (dosage form) (CAS No. 72559-06-9) (provided                      No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        for in subheading 3004.20.00)...........................  Free                                                31/94           ''

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to articles 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31. 2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**                   I, Jerry L. Ball  ,  EVP/CFO of Valrico Bancorp, Inc  ,  certify that:                   (name)     (title)   (company)      
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of June 30, 2004;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  **b.** **[This paragraph intentionally left blank.]**  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 16, 2004 /s/ Jerry L. Ball – EVP/CFO   (name & title)
Exhibit 10.4
                                  ------------

                                  Option Number

                         OPTION TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK
                                       OF
                          GROEN BROTHERS AVIATION, INC.



(AMOUNT) Shares                                                     No Par Value

         This Option hereby entitles (OPTIONEE NAME) to purchase (SHARE AMOUNT
(SHARE AMOUNT NUMERIC)) shares of common stock from Groen Brothers Aviation,
Inc. (the Company), a Utah Corporation.

         This Option is exercisable at (STRIKE PRICE) per share.

         Purchase of stock through this option shall, unless registered, be
"restricted" as that term is defined within Rule 144 which was promulgated
pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

         Unless waived by the Company, the holder of this Option shall give
written notice to the Company five (5) days prior to exercise of said option.

         This Option shall expire on (DATE)

         Effective: (DATE)


                           ---------------------------------
                           David Groen, President & CEO
Attest:


---------------------------------
Dennis P. Gauger, Secretary & CFO
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 233 (Monday, December 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30758]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 18, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Carl W. Ellis, Perryton, Texas; to acquire additional voting 
shares of FirstPerryton Bancorp, Inc., Perryton, Texas, and 
FirstPerryton Delaware, Inc., Dover, Delaware, and thereby indirectly 
acquire additional voting shares of First Bank Southwest, N.A., 
Amarillo, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 28, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-30758 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999 
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999 
<CASH>                                           7,236 
<SECURITIES>                                    14,928 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,711 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (190) 
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,121 
<PP&E>                                           5,273 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (966) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1 
<COMMON>                                            11 
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,481  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,499 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,232 
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,653  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    68 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,123)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,123)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,123)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31) 
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,866                   2,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      331                     557
<ALLOWANCES>                                        25                      25
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,538                   3,536
<PP&E>                                           2,550                   2,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,034                   1,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,096                   4,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,485                   1,896
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           273                     172
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,317                   2,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,096                   4,293
<SALES>                                            644                   1,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,565                   4,667
<CGS>                                                0                      96
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      580                   3,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,830                   3,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    25                      25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (35)                     (8)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    190                 (1,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                190                 (1,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,810)                 (1,959)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)                  (0.12)


</TABLE>
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 19674.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 4, 1938.

E. G. Pharr and C. C. McKinney, both of Cooper, fot* appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is receiving and concealing stolen property under the value of $50; the punishment, confinement in jail for 60 days.

The state’s evidence was to the effect that E. C. Carmichael stole an automobile from Lloyd Wilson of the value of approximately $35. Appellant bought the car from Carmichael.

 Appellant testified that he bought the car in good faith and .had no knowledge that it had been stolen by Carmichael at the time he received it. He submitted a special charge covering this affirmative defense. Also its omission from the main charge was properly excepted to. The court declined to amend the charge and re*388fused the requested instruction. The matter presents reversible error. It has been uniformly held that an affirmative charge should be given presenting the defensive theory if supported by any testimony. Littlejohn v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 552, 56 S.W.2d 876.

The state relied upon circumstantial evidence, and an unqualified charge on the subject should have, been given. The court’s qualification to the charge, in instructing the jury that the state relied in part upon circumstantial evidence, was erroneous.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
#### WELCH v. STATE.

No. 19788.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1938.

Robert P. Brown, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of chickens is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for 100 days.

The appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given on September 24, 1937. On December 23rd following, the appellant filed an affidavit stating his inability to' pay for a statement of facts or to give security therefor. According to the written statement of the district judge, when the affidavit of the appellant was presented to him on the date mentioned, ninety days had elapsed since the date of the overruling of the motion for. new trial and the giving of the-notice of appeal. Under the circumstances, we think the appellant failed to use the diligence required by law in filing his request for a copy of the *66statement of facts. See Tex.Jur. vol. 4, p. 418, § 286.

In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial this court will be unable to appraise the merits of the bills of exception found in the transcript. See Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P. vol. 3, art. 760, note 17; also Pocket Part.

No error having been perceived which would authorize a reversal, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco Lewis, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered March 27, 1986, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

During the pretrial suppression hearing, the prosecution’s police witness testified that he had been given a description of the suspect by witnesses at the scene, but that he did not write down this description in his memo book. However, at trial, it was revealed that the officer did in fact write down a description of the defendant in an unlined section of the *460memo book. Part of that description stated that the suspect had a gold tooth. No such descriptive feature was testified to at the hearing. The officer also revealed at trial that he had made a notation regarding the gold tooth on the back of the defendant’s arrest photograph. Neither item had been turned over to defense counsel. The trial court conducted an immediate hearing and, after questioning both the officer and the prosecutor, found that the prosecutor had initially been unaware of the memo book entry, and while subsequently informed of it, his failure to disclose was not deliberate but only neglectful. The court also found that the prosecutor was unaware of the notation on the back of the photo.

Because of the failure to timely turn over this *Rosario*material, the trial court then took various curative steps. It gave extensive instructions to the jury that it was to disregard any testimony from the officer concerning the gold tooth; it took judicial notice of the fact that the People failed to turn over the material and instructed the jury that this was a violation of law; it gave an adverse inference charge; it gave defense counsel the opportunity to reopen the cross-examination of the police officer; and it reminded the jury of its duty to follow the court’s instructions.

Where there is a delay in the disclosure of *Rosario*material, reversal is only required if the defendant is substantially prejudiced by the delay *(see, People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937; *People v Ranghelle,*69 NY2d 56). Because of the curative actions taken by the trial court, which had discretion to determine the appropriate sanction to employ *(see, People v Martinez, supra; People v Kelly,*62 NY2d 516), we find that the defendant was not substantially prejudiced.

We have considered the arguments raised by defendant in his supplemental *pro se*brief and find them to be either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1117

To reduce until January 1, 1995, the duty on succinic anhydride.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To reduce until January 1, 1995, the duty on succinic

anhydride.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUCCINIC ANHYDRIDE.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 Succinic anhydride, not derived in whole or

in part from aromatic hydrocarbons (provided for in subheading

2917.19.27) ...... 4% No change No change On or before

12/31/94 ’’.
2

•HR 1117 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section 1

3 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from

4 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ