alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30578]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences (1754).
    Date/Time: January 10-12, 2001, 8 a.m.-5 p.m. daily.
    Place: Room 340, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 
22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Ms. Carter Kimsey, Program Director, 
Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Microbial Biology Program, 
Division of Biological Infrastructure, Room 615, NSF, 4210 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8470.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Postdoctoral Research Fellowship 
in Microbial Biology Program proposals as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: November 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30578 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



The Employment Agreement made as of the 10th day of January, 2003 by and between
AvalonBay

Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Bryce Blair (“Executive”)
is hereby amended as follows:



Section 7(c)(iii)(B) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting said subsection in
its entirety and substituting thereof the following:





     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and”


Section 7(c)(iv)(E) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting said subsection in
its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





     “(E) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive.”


Section 7(c)(v) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (B) thereof in
its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and”



Except as amended herein, the Employment Agreement is hereby confirmed in all
other respects.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is entered into this 31st day of
March, 2005.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charlene Rothkopf
 	 
	 	 	Charlene Rothkopf, EVP – Human Resources 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	                                                          /s/ Edward M. Schulman
 	 
	 	 	Edward M. Schulman, 	 
	 	 	SVP, General Counsel & Secretary 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                          /s/ Bryce Blair
 	 
	 	Executive
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 164 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue the final rules relating 

to the listing of the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes and the 

State of Wyoming under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. ENZI, Ms. BALDWIN, and Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue the final 

rules relating to the listing of the gray wolf in the 

Western Great Lakes and the State of Wyoming under 

the Endangered Species Act of 1973. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULES RELATING TO 

4 GRAY WOLVES IN THE WESTERN GREAT 

5 LAKES AND THE STATE OF WYOMING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, not later than 60 days after the date of enactVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:34 Jan 28, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S164.IS S164

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 164 IS

1 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall re2 issue— 

3 (1) the final rule entitled ‘‘Endangered and 

4 Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revising the Listing 

5 of the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in the Western Great 

6 Lakes’’ (76 Fed. Reg. 81666 (December 28, 2011)); 

7 and 

8 (2) the final rule entitled ‘‘Endangered and 

9 Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removal of the 

10 Gray Wolf in Wyoming From the Federal List of 

11 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Removal 

12 of the Wyoming Wolf Population’s Status as an Ex13 perimental Population’’ (77 Fed. Reg. 55530 (Sep14 tember 10, 2012)). 

15 (b) NO JUDICIAL REVIEW.—The reissuance of the 

16 final rules described in subsection (a) shall not be subject 

17 to judicial review. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rogelio Davila, Respondent. Colorite Film Processing, Inc., Appellant; Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 24, 1989, which, *inter alia,*assessed Colorite Film Processing, Inc. for unemployment insurance contributions.

The conclusion that Colorite Film Processing, Inc. exercised sufficient direction and control over its messengers to establish their status as employees is supported by substantial evidence in the record *(see, Matter of Di Martino [Buffalo Courier Express Co.—Ross],*59 NY2d 638). This is true even though there was evidence in the record which could have arguably supported a contrary conclusion *(see, Matter of CDK Delivery Serv. [Hartnett],*151 AD2d 932). The messengers telephone Colorite’s dispatcher for pick-up instructions, the deliveries were required to be completed the same day, Colorite set the pay rates for small package delivery and sometimes directed the order of delivery, and customer complaints were directed to Colorite. The remaining contentions of Colorite have been addressed and found lacking in merit.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAULA PENSO

, Appellant,

v.

ELIZABETH GORDON AT LAUDERHILL, LLC,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 3295

[ July 20, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Fabienne Fahnestock , Judge; L.T. Case No. C A CE22

-

13196 (18)

.

Paula Penso, Tamarac, pro se.

George A. Minski of the Law Offices of George A. Minski, P.A.,

Hollywood, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 363

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate October 1994 as ‘‘Crime Prevention Month’’.

Whereas crime prevention improves the quality of life in every

community;

Whereas crime prevention is a cost-effective answer to the

problems caused by crime, drug abuse, and fear of crime;

Whereas crime prevention is central to a sound criminal justice system at National, State, and local levels;

Whereas millions of citizens have demonstrated that by working together, they can reduce crime, drug abuse, and fear

of crime;
2

•HJ 363 RFS

Whereas all people of the United States, from preschoolers to

senior citizens, can help themselves, their families, and

their neighborhoods prevent crime and build safer more

caring communities;

Whereas all kinds of community organizations (including individuals, law enforcement, other State and local agencies, civic and community groups, religious institutions,

schools, and businesses) have vital roles to play in reducing crime and building safer, more vibrant communities;

Whereas it is important to honor annually those throughout

society who work to prevent crime and to build and sustain communities; and

Whereas the National Citizens’ Crime Prevention Campaign

(featuring McGruff the Crime Dog and sponsored by the

Department of Justice, the Crime Prevention Coalition,

and the National Crime Prevention Council) encourages

effective partnerships to reduce crime and to improve life

throughout the Nation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the month of October 1994 is designated as ‘‘Crime

4 Prevention Month’’ and the President is authorized and

5 requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe this month with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury
 DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 2, 2001 to be assured of consideration. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) *OMB Number:*
                     1545-1144. *Form Number:*
                     IRS Form 706-GS(D). *Type of Review:*
                     Extension. *Title:*
                     Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Return for Distributions. *Description:*
                     Form 706-GS(D) is used by the distributees to compute and report the Federal GST tax imposed by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 2601. IRS uses the information to enforce this tax and to verify that the tax has been properly computed. *Respondents:*
                     Individuals or households. *Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers:*
                     1,000. *Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:* Recordkeeping
6 min.Learning about the law or the form
13 min.Preparing the form
24 min.Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS
20 min.
 *Frequency of Response:*
                     Annually. *Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden:*
                     1,080 hours. *Clearance Officer:*
                     Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224. *OMB Reviewer:*
                     Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Lois K. Holland, Departmental Reports, Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 00-30590 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 10-3137

___________________________

B & B Hardware, Inc., a California Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Hargis Industries, Inc., a Texas Corporation, doing business as Sealtite Building

Fasteners, doing business as East Texas Fasteners; East Texas Fasteners, a

business entity of form unknown; John Does, 1 through 10, inclusive

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

___________________________

No. 11-1247

___________________________

B & B Hardware, Inc., a California Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Hargis Industries, Inc., a Texas Corporation, doing business as Sealtite Building

Fasteners, doing business as East Texas Fasteners; East Texas Fasteners, a

business entity of form unknown; John Does, 1 through 10, inclusive

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________
Appeals from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: June 3, 2015

 Filed: August 25, 2015

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

This matter is on remand from the United States Supreme Court, see B & B

Hardware, Inc. v. HargisIndus., Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1293 (2015). The Court has directed

us to apply this rule: “So long as the other ordinary elements of issue preclusion are

met, when the usages adjudicated by the TTAB are materially the same as those

before the district court, issue preclusion should apply.” Id. at 1310. 

We directed the parties to submit supplemental briefing. Having reviewed the

briefing, we now determine that the ordinary elements of issue preclusion have been

met and the usages of the marks adjudicated before the TTAB were materially the

same as the usages before the district court. As noted in our prior opinions, the

TTAB compared the marks in question in the marketplace context when it determined

the likelihood of confusion issue for purposes of trademark registration. See B & B

Hardware, Inc. v. HargisIndus., Inc., 716 F.3d 1020, 1025 (8th Cir. 2013); id. at 1029

(Colloton, J., dissenting). 

Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this matter for

further proceedings, including what remedies may be awarded for infringement. See

Masters v. UHS of Del., Inc., 631 F.3d 464, 471 n.2 (8th Cir. 2011); Minn. Pet

Breeders, Inc. v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc., 41 F.3d 1242, 1246-47 (8th Cir. 1994). On

-2-
remand, the district court is directed to give preclusive effect to the decision of the

TTAB on likelihood of confusion. The district court’s award of attorney’s feesis also

reversed and remanded for further consideration. 

______________________________

-3-
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of MBNA Corporation, and in the related Prospectuses, of our
report dated January 12, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of MBNA Corporation, included in the 2000 Annual Report to
Stockholders of MBNA Corporation and incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000:

|       |  |           |  |                                                                                   
|------ |  | --------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Number |  | 33-41936  |  | on Form S-8 dated July 22, 1991                                                   
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 33-41895  |  | on Form S-8 dated July 24, 1991                                                   
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 33-50498  |  | on Form S-3 (as amended by Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1) dated August 28, 1992  
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 33-71640  |  | on Form S-8 dated November 15, 1993                                               
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 33-76278  |  | on Form S-3 (as amended by Amendment No. 1) dated
April 8, 1994                   
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 33-95438  |  | on Form S-8 dated August 4, 1995                                                  
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 33-95600  |  | on Form S-3 (as amended by Pre-Effective Amendment
No. 1) dated September 1, 1995 
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-17187 |  | on Form S-3 dated December 3, 1996                                                
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-15721 |  | on Form S-3 (as amended by Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1) dated December 10, 1996
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-21181 |  | on Form S-4 (as amended by Amendment No. 1) dated
February 25, 1997               
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-06824 |  | on Form S-8 dated April 22, 1997                                                  
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-47179 |  | on Form S-3 dated April 6, 1998                                                   
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-51477 |  | on Form S-8 dated April 30, 1998                                                  
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-74919 |  | on Form S-3 (as amended by Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1) dated March 24, 1999   
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-79987 |  | on Form S-8 dated June 4, 1999                                                    
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-44422 |  | on Form S-8 dated August 24, 2000                                                 
|      
|      
|      
|      
|Number |  | 333-45814 |  | on Form S-3 dated September 14, 2000                                              

Baltimore, Maryland
March 16, 2001
**HHS Announcements**

1. At the end of March 2013, CMS released an informational bulletin on *Prevention and Early Identification of Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions*. Informational bulletins are designed to highlight recently released policy guidance and regulations and also to share important operational and technical information related to Medicaid and CHIP. More information can be found here: http://www.medicaid.gov/Federal-Policy-Guidance/Federal-Policy-Guidance.html.

1. SAMHSA will be hosting a youth dialogue with justice involved youth with behavioral health issues in the next couple of months – in collaboration with International Association of Chiefs of Police and other community leaders-  titled, “**Engaging the Community In Preventing Youth of Color With Behavioral Health Challenges From Entering the Legal Justice Systems.  *”***The purpose of this dialogue meeting is to develop a common vision and action agenda for improved collaboration between communities and their legal justice systems to examine best practices to reduce the entry and penetration of youth of color with behavioral health disorders into the justice system.  This meeting is not open to the public, but the Coordinating Council can receive an update on the proceedings after the meeting. 

1. In 2012, SAMHSA held a Juvenile Justice Policy Academy and Action Network with the MacArthur Foundation for 8 states.  The key focus is on Models for Change and development of state policies for screening, evidence-based practices, and diversion.  The work will be coming to completion this year and the Coordinating Council can receive an update at that time. 

1. SAMHSA is developing a CMS/CMCS “10 Ways” product for outreach and enrollment strategies around the Affordable Care Act for criminal justice populations.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1506 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1506

    To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the residency 
  requirement for United States attorneys and assistant United States 
                               attorneys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 1993

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the residency 
  requirement for United States attorneys and assistant United States 
                               attorneys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 545(a) of 
title 28, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Each United States attorney shall reside in the district for 
which he or she is appointed, except that the United States attorney of 
the District of Columbia, the Southern District of New York, or the 
Eastern District of New York may reside within 50 miles of the district 
for which he or she is appointed. Each assistant United States attorney 
shall reside in the district for which he or she is appointed or within 
50 miles of the district. The provisions of this subsection shall not 
apply to any United States attorney or assistant United States attorney 
appointed for the Northern Mariana Islands who at the same time is 
serving in the same capacity in another district.''.

                                 <all>
```