alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

The National Park Service (NPS) has prepared a Director's Order setting forth its policies and procedures related to social science. When adopted, the policies and procedures will apply to all units of the national park system.

# DATES:

Written comments will be accepted until January 15, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Draft Director's Order #78 is available on the Internet at                         *http://www.nps.gov/​refdesk/​DOrders/​index.htm.*                         Requests for copies and written comments should be sent to Dr. Gary Machlis, NPS Visiting Chief Social Scientist, Social Science Program, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW (3127), Washington, DC 20240, or to his Internet address: gary_machlis@nps.gov.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Gary Machlis at                         *gary_machlis@nps.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The NPS is updating its current system of internal policies. When these documents contain new policy or procedural requirements that may affect parties outside the NPS, they are first made available for public review and comment before being adopted. This draft of Director's Order #78 covers social science topics such as permits, data collection and Paperwork Reduction Act compliance, ethical guidelines, and roles and responsibilities related to social science in the National Park Service.

Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from the administrative record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a respondent's identity, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment.

Dated: November 27, 2000.

Michael Soukup,

Associate Director, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science.

[FR Doc. 00-30848  Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4321-70-M
#### In the Matter of William L. Buchwald et al., Appellants, v New York State Police and Firemen’s Retirement System et al., Respondents.

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered September 7, 1989 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents denying petitioners’ request for a redetermination of their retirement status.

When petitioners applied for retirement benefits from respondent New York State Policemen’s and Firemen’s Retirement System (hereinafter PFRS), their requested allowances were reduced based on a PFRS finding that accumulated vacation credits were improperly included in the original "final average salary” of each petitioner. Petitioners sought *775restoration of these benefits, claiming that such was "overtime” and thus includable in their one year "final average salary” on which their retirement benefits are based (Retirement and Social Security Law §302 [9] [d]). The "overtime” claimed by petitioners consisted of payments made to them for work performed during scheduled vacation periods. This work was voluntary and in each case compensated on a "straight time basis”. The employment contract required payment of time-and-a-half if the duties were actually "overtime”.

The Hearing Officer rejected petitioners’ claim that the payments be considered "overtime” under General Municipal Law § 90 and concluded that the recalculation of benefits which denied petitioners’ claims was rational. The Hearing Officer found no evidence that the compensation received by petitioners for voluntary employment during vacation periods included "overtime”. Respondent Comptroller agreed.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, Supreme Court rejected petitioners’ claim and dismissed the petition for legal insufficiency, denying petitioners’ request to transfer the proceeding to this court for review of a substantial evidence question. We agree with the judgment of Supreme Court. The issue raised by petitioners is not novel. It has already been determined by this court *(see, Matter of Maliszewski v Regan,*144 AD2d 170; *Matter of Hoffman v New York State Policemen’s & Firemen’s Retirement Sys.,*142 AD2d 854; *Matter of Hohensee v Regan,*138 AD2d 812, *lv denied*72 NY2d 807). Furthermore, we reject petitioners’ attempt to raise a constitutional challenge to the determination for the first time on this appeal *(see, Matherson v Marchello,*100 AD2d 233, 241, n 4). The judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

         BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND PLUS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund Plus
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                       /s/Jenny Netzer
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Jenny Netzer
                                       Principal Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Financial Officer
                                       Arch Street VIII, Inc. as
                                       Managing General Partner of
                                       Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund
                                       Plus, A Limited Partnership

                                       Date:  September 5, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2009- ^53 V 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMEN;NTT APPROVE APPROVED &lMM IM r 0 I 

DOCKET GST 

This approval ai!<; grant of ontitnist iinmuniiy . . j jtt, where applicable, 

to conditions previously linposed. 

Titis action is effective aiier 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is imdertaiien on the Department's ov/n motion. 

In view of the agreement's noncoiUroversial nature and the availability of 

the above/prSaedure, the 2 l-da)Lperioiin 14 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

8 December 2009 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

Intemational Air Transport Association 

I ATA Washington, 

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 300 - North Building 

Washington DC 20004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
(THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS, AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS
OF  OPERATIONS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                         24,200   
<SECURITIES>                                   0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                  59,700   
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,100    
<INVENTORY>                                    332,800  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,114,200
<PP&E>                                         254,900  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 70,500   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,380,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,000  
<BONDS>                                        0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,008,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,380,100
<SALES>                                        1,188,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,188,600
<CGS>                                          821,800  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  821,800  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               281,700  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (14,000) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                99,100   
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            47,300   
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (52,800) 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0      
<CHANGES>                                      0      
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,500)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
                                               


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 106

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision which

includes unemployment compensation in income subject to tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. APPLEGATE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the provision which includes unemployment compensation

in income subject to tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TAXATION OF UNEMPLOYMENT

4 COMPENSATION.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Section 85 of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to unemployment com7 pensation) is hereby repealed.

8 (b) REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Sec9 tion 6050B of such Code (relating to returns relating to

10 unemployment compensation) is hereby repealed.
2

•HR 106 IH

1 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) The table of sections for part II of sub3 chapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by

4 striking the item relating to section 85.

5 (2) The table of sections for subpart B of part

6 III of subchapter A of chapter 61 of such Code is

7 amended by striking the item relating to section

8 6050B.

9 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to payments after December 31,

11 1990.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          38,789
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                       847
<INVENTORY>                                      4,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,971
<PP&E>                                         134,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,141
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           288
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,880
<SALES>                                        230,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               239,494
<CGS>                                           84,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,313)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,422
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,422
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-618-001]

Take notice that on November 21, 2000, U-T Offshore System, L.L.C. (UTOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an effective date of November 1, 2000:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 61

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 61-A

UTOS states that the tendered sheets are filed in compliance with the Commission's October 27, 2000 Order in the referenced dockets, regarding the netting and trading of imbalances on UTOS' system.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30743  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,065]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on September 5, 2000, in response to a petition filed on August 22, 2000 on behalf of workers at It's Personal, New York, New York.

The Department of Labor has been unable to locate principals of the firm or otherwise obtain information to reach a determination on worker eligibility. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of November, 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-31039  Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1766 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the SAFER Act of 2013, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1766 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sexual Assault Foren3 sic Evidence Reporting Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘SAFER Act 

4 of 2017’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PEDIATRIC SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS. 

6 Section 304(c)(2) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice 

7 Act of 2004 (34 U.S.C. 40723(c)(2)) is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘, both adult and pediatric,’’ 

9 after ‘‘role of forensic nurses’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘and elder abuse’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘elder abuse, and, in particular, the need for pedi12 atric sexual assault nurse examiners, including such 

13 nurse examiners working in the multidisciplinary 

14 setting, in responding to abuse of both children and 

15 adolescents’’. 

16 SEC. 3. REDUCING THE RAPE KIT BACKLOG. 

17 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 2(c)(4) of the DNA 

18 Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 

19 40701(c)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘2017’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘2022’’. 
3 

†S 1766 ES

1 (b) SUNSET.—Section 1006 of the SAFER Act of 

2 2013 (34 U.S.C. 40701 note) is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’. 

Passed the Senate October 23, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1766 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the SAFER Act of 2013, and for 

other purposes.
#### Bernadette Burwell, Respondent, v Bic Corporation, Also Known as Bic Pen Corporation, Appellant.

In a products liability action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated April 12, 1989, as granted in part the plaintiff’s motion to compel certain disclosure and which denied in part the defendant’s cross motion for a protective order.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provisions thereof that granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to compel disclosure of reports and results of investigations arising from prior similar complaints, incidents and lawsuits, and denied that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for a protective order with respect to reports and results of investigations arising from prior similar complaints, incidents and lawsuits, and substituting therefor provisions denying that branch of the motion and granting that branch of the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to adopt its proposed confidentiality order with respect to the disclosure of trade secrets is without merit. The court’s language provides reasonable and adequate safeguards to prevent *533the dissemination of the defendant’s trade secrets *(see, Tymko v K-Mart Discount Stores,*75 AD2d 987; *Snyder v Parke, Davis & Co.,*56 AD2d 536; *McLaughlin v G.D. Searle, Inc.,*38 AD2d 810). Moreover, we agree with the court’s determination that the defendant’s definition of a "similar claim” was unduly restrictive and improper. In addition, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion to refer the defendant’s claim that the plaintiff had somehow violated a Federal court’s protective order to the Federal court that had issued the order.

However, the plaintiffs request for the production of all reports and results of investigations arising out of similar prior complaints, incidents and lawsuits should have been denied as being overly broad *(see, Ganin v Janow,*86 AD2d 857; *Rios v Donovan,*21 AD2d 409). Kooper, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.