alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MASSACHUSETTS 1NSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 

LINCOLN LABORATORY 

244 WOOD STREET 

LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02420-9108 

27 July 2015 

Area Code 781 

98.1-1200 

US Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviati.on Administration 

800 Independence Ave, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Petition Regarding: Exemption 5210N 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-200I -8870-0024 

MIT Lincoln Laboratory requests a two year extension to 

Exemption 5210 which provides relief from 14 CFR 91.319(c). The 

purpose of the exemption is to allow the conduct of airborne 

research and development in technology for support of national 

security. Commercial a.ircraft operated by MIT Lincoln Laboratory 

are modified and flown in the experimental category for the 

conduct of airborne research. MIT Lincoln Laboratory has been 

conducting research safely since the first exemption was granted 

in 2001. MIT Lincoln Laboratory requests this extension with no 

other changes except the extension of the expirati.on date. All 

conditions and li.mitations that currently exist in Regulatory 

Docket FAA-2001-8870-0024 would remain i.n place and unchanged. 

, 

Sincerely, 

~ 

W. Michael Radoslov.ich
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50241 USDC No. WA-91-CV-315

__________________ SYNNACHIA McQUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAVID TURNER, COIII; GREG L. KLEPPER, Officer; ROGELIO NAVARRO, COIII, Officer; MICHAEL WISEMAN, COIII; DAVID H. McCULLOUGH, Lt.; DENNIS POLK, Sgt., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - November 7, 1995 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Synnachia McQueen's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is DENIED. McQueen appeals a jury verdict that Correctional Officers David Turner and Greg Klepper did not use excessive force against him in prison. McQueen contends that the district court erred by denying his motion in limine; gave erroneous jury instructionsNo. 95-50241 -2- regarding the Eighth Amendment and the defendants' good-faith defense; failed to instruct the jury regarding his Fourteenth Amendment and state-law claims; and erred by not admitting into evidence an internal affairs report. McQueen also contends that the defendants did not offer a non-discriminatory reason for exercising a peremptory strike against the sole remaining black venireperson and that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. We have examined McQueen's motion and the record and have concluded that all of the issues he raises for appeal are frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). We have warned McQueen that frivolous appeals might result in sanctions. We also have admonished McQueen to review his pending appeals and withdraw any that are frivolous. We reiterate our admonition to McQueen and warn him that any further frivolous appeals will result in sanctions.
APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Scott D. Kantor, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



         November 10, 2004                        /s/ Scott D. Kantor
                                                  -------------------
                                                      Scott D. Kantor
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.3


I, Charles T. Goodson, certify that:


|   |                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of PetroQuest Energy, Inc.;

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




/s/ Charles T. Goodson


Charles T. Goodson


Chief Executive Officer


March 29, 2018
#### STEVENSON et al. v. FRISKE.

No. 10740.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 12, 1940.

Seabury, Taylor & Wagner, of Brownsville, for plaintiffs in error.

Carter & Stiernberg, of Harlingen, for defendant in error.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

In this case the several parties have filed a joint motion to affirm the judgment from which the appeal was perfected, it being represented that the matters in controversy have been fully settled between the parties. Upon that premise, and without passing upon the merits of the appeal, the motion will be granted and the judgment affirmed accordingly.
EGU MACT: Emissions limits 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 02/24/2011 12:54 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell 

Hi Bob, 

 

See the questions below – which is correct (either?): 

The Emissions Limitations [sic] for Coal Fired and Solid Oil Derived Fuel 

Fired EGUs on page 24, Section 2.3.3, Table 2-1 of the RIA are 

substantially different than those shown in the preamble Table 14, page 

318. (Also in Table 2 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63, preamble page 835). 

 

If the preamble limits are correct, why are the limits in the RIA 

different? 

 

Regards, 

Cortney
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Moller International (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Paul S. Moller, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the Best of his knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: 10/13/2010




Signed:




/s/ Paul S. Moller




CEO and President
# Euroopan unionin C 54A/21.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 54A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 60. vuosikerta21. helmikuu 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 54A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

60. vuosikerta21. helmikuu 2017

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Neuvosto |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Soveltuvien hakijoiden luetteloiden voimassaoloajan pidentäminen | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Neuvosto

2017/C 54 A/01

Soveltuvien hakijoiden luetteloiden voimassaoloajan pidentäminen

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Neuvosto

| 21.2.2017 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 54/1

---

Soveltuvien hakijoiden luetteloiden voimassaoloajan pidentäminen

(2017/C 054 A/01)

Euroopan unionin neuvoston pääsihteerin päätöksellä pidennetään seuraavien avointen kilpailujen perusteella vahvistettujen soveltuvien hakijoiden luetteloiden voimassaoloaikaa 31 päivään joulukuuta 2019:

| CONS/AD/430


  (kaksi tehtävää) | joka on järjestetty varallaololuettelon laatimiseksi Euroopan turvallisuus- ja puolustuspolitiikan (ETPP) alan vanhemmista hallintovirkamiehistä. Kilpailu koskee kahta palkkaluokkaan AD 9 kuuluvaa toimenkuvaa (toimenkuva 1: vanhempi strateginen suunnittelija kriisinhallintaoperaatioita varten; toimenkuva 2: vanhempi suunnittelija voimavarojen kehittämistä varten sotilas-, siviili- ja avaruusalalla); niitä koskeva ilmoitus on julkaistu
  Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä C 178 A, 15.7.2008. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | joka on järjestetty varallaololuettelon laatimiseksi iirinkielisen yksikönpäällikön (AD 12) virkaa varten kääntämisen alalla ja jota koskeva ilmoitus on julkaistu
  Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä C 99 A, 30.4.2009. |

CONS/AD/430

(kaksi tehtävää)

joka on järjestetty varallaololuettelon laatimiseksi Euroopan turvallisuus- ja puolustuspolitiikan (ETPP) alan vanhemmista hallintovirkamiehistä. Kilpailu koskee kahta palkkaluokkaan AD 9 kuuluvaa toimenkuvaa (toimenkuva 1: vanhempi strateginen suunnittelija kriisinhallintaoperaatioita varten; toimenkuva 2: vanhempi suunnittelija voimavarojen kehittämistä varten sotilas-, siviili- ja avaruusalalla); niitä koskeva ilmoitus on julkaistu
  Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä C 178 A, 15.7.2008.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

joka on järjestetty varallaololuettelon laatimiseksi iirinkielisen yksikönpäällikön (AD 12) virkaa varten kääntämisen alalla ja jota koskeva ilmoitus on julkaistu
  Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä C 99 A, 30.4.2009.

---
#### HAMILTON v. STATE.

No. 20227.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1939.

W. ,G. Polk, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for robbery with firearms, punishment being assessed at twenty-five years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all matters of procedure appearing to be in proper form, the judgment is affirmed.
13 CA ADC § 2254 Page 1

13 CCR s 2254

Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13, s 2254

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF 

REGULATIONS

TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES

DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD

CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUELS

ARTICLE 1. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE

SUBARTICLE 1. GASOLINE STANDARDS THAT 

BECAME APPLICABLE BEFORE 1996

This database is current through 12/26/2003, Register 

2003, No. 52.

s 2254. Manganese Additive Content.

(a) Except as provided in subparagraph (b), no person 

shall add manganese or any manganese compound, including the compound methylcyclopentadienyl manganese 

tricarbonyl (MMT), to gasoline represented as unleaded 

intended to be sold, offered for sale, or delivered for sale at 

retail in the State of California.

(b) The prohibitions set forth in subparagraph (a) shall not 

apply to any person who has applied for and received from 

the Executive Officer written approval to add manganese 

or any manganese compound, including MMT, to gasoline 

represented as unleaded for the purpose of conducting tests 

or research into the effect thereof on vehicle emissions, 

fuel economy, performance, or for other related research 

objectives.

<General Materials (GM) - References, Annotations, or 

Tables>

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 

43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and Western 

Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal Rptr. 249 (1975). 

Reference: Sections 39000-39003, 39500, 39515, 39516, 

43000, 43013 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and 

Western Oil and Gas Ass'n v. Orange County APCD, 14 

Cal3d. 411, 121 Cal. Rptr 249 (1975). 

HISTORY 

1. New section filed 8-1-77; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 77, 

No. 32).

2. Amendment filed 10-25-77 as an emergency; effective upon filing. Certificate

of Compliance included (Register 77, No. 44).

3. Amendment of NOTE filed 3-3-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register

83, No. 10).

4. Amendment of subsections (a) and (b) filed 7-12-91; operative 8-12-91 

(Register 91, No. 43).

13 CA ADC s 2254

END OF DOCUMENT
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service. USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

The USDA Forest Service, Washington Office, is transmitting the final boundary of the North Fork of the Middle Fork of the Willamette National Wild and Scenic River to Congress.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Dunbar, Willamette National Forest, 211 East 6th Avenue, Eugene, Oregon 97440, phone 541-465-6541.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The North Fork of the Middle Fork of the Willamette Wild and Scenic River boundary is available for review at the following offices: USDA Forest Service, Recreation, Yates Building, 14th and Independence Avenues SW., Washington, DC 20024; Pacific Northwest Regional Office, 333 SW. First Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204; and, Willamette National Forest, 211 East 6th Avenue, Eugene, Oregon 97440.

The Omnibus Oregon Wild and Service Rivers Act (Public Law 100-557) of October 28, 1998, designated the North Fork of the Middle Fork of the Willamette River, Oregon, as a National Wild and Scenic River, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture. The final decision on delineation of a river corridor boundary is based on the North Fork of the Middle Fork of the Willamette Wild and Scenic River Decision Notice and Environmental Assessment dated January 9, 1992. Unless changed by Congress, the boundary decision will be implemented ninety days after Congress receives the transmittal.

Dated: November 28, 2000.

Nancy Graybeal,

Deputy Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 00-30754  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1487

To limit the amounts obligated or expended for fiscal year 1994 for travel

expenses for officers and employees of the Federal Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1993

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

jointly to the Committees on Government Operations, House Administration, and the Judiciary

A BILL

To limit the amounts obligated or expended for fiscal year

1994 for travel expenses for officers and employees of

the Federal Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding any other provision of law, of the

4 amounts appropriated for fiscal year 1994 for travel ex5 penses for officers or employees of any department, agen6 cy, or other entity of the executive, legislative, or judicial

7 branch—

8 (1) not more than 75 percent shall be obligated

9 or expended for such purposes; and
2

•HR 1487 IH

1 (2) 25 percent shall be returned to the Treas2 ury and used to reduce the Federal budget deficit.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 233 (Monday, December 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30778]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3305; Amendment No. 2]


State of Arizona

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated November 27, 2000, the above-numbered 
Declaration is hereby amended to include Yavapai County in the State of 
Arizona as a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and 
flooding which occurred beginning on October 21, 2000 and continuing 
through November 8, 2000.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous county of Coconino, Arizona may be 
filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. 
All other contiguous counties have been previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is December 26, 2000 and for 
economic injury the deadline is July 27, 2001.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: November 28, 2000.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-30778 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury
 DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 2, 2001 to be assured of consideration. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) *OMB Number:*
                     1545-0135. *Form Number:*
                     IRS Form 1138. *Type of Review:*
                     Extension. *Title:*
                     Extension of Time for Payment of Taxes by a Corporation Expecting a Net Operating Loss Carryback. *Description:*
                     Form 1138 is filed by corporations to request an extension of time to pay their income taxes, including estimated taxes. Corporations may only file for an extension when they expect a net operating loss carryback in the tax year and want to delay the payment of taxes from a prior tax year. *Respondents:*
                     Business or other for-profit. *Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers:*
                     2,033. *Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:* Recordkeeping
3 hr., 21 min.Learning about the law or the form
42 min.Preparing and sending the form to the IRS
46 min.
 *Frequency of Response:*
                     On occasion. *Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden:*
                     9,800 hours. *Clearance Officer:*
                     Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224. *OMB Reviewer:*
                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Lois K. Holland, Departmental Reports Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 00-30591 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
August 8, 2016

Mr. Aaron Quesnoy

Keystone UAS LLC

225 Church Street 7H

Philadelphia, PA 19106

Re: FAA–2016–1178

Dear Mr. Quesnoy:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
Exhibit 21





SUBSIDIARIES





Set forth below is a list of subsidiaries of Burlington Industries, Inc.
(the Company)* and, as to each person named, the percentage of voting securities owned, or other bases of control, by its immediate parent.





Name

State or Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Percentage of Voting Power Represented by Securities Owned by the Company on September 28, 2002Burlington Investment Inc.

Delaware

100%Burlington Fabrics Inc.

Delaware

100%Proyectos Burlmex, S. de R.L. de C.V.

Mexico

100%Burlington Yecapixtla, S.A. de C.V.

Mexico

100%


---

|* |  | The names of 24 domestic subsidiaries and 16 foreign subsidiaries of the Company have been omitted because, considered in the aggregate, they would not
constitute a significant subsidiary. All of the foregoing subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------