alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John C Hodgman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cygnus, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Annual Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual
Report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ John C HodgmanJohn C HodgmanChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sean B. OConnor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 12, 2009 |  |                        
|                        |  | /s/ Sean B. OConnor   
|                        |  | Sean B. OConnor       
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. R. 1346

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the Federal building located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as the

‘‘Almeric L. Christian Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Almeric L. Christian Federal

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Almeric

L. Christian Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KAYENTA KREATIONS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,373
<PP&E>                                           9,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              382
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,019
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,322
<SALES>                                            143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   143
<CGS>                                               59
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,286)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,286)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-626-001]

Take notice that on November 13, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline Company (Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following sheets to be effective January 1, 2001:

18 Revised Sheet No. 48

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 70

Original Sheet No. 99

Sheet No. 100

Transwestern states that this filing is made to comply with the Commission's October 27, 2000 order which directed Transwestern to file tariff sheets to implement trading of operator imbalances.

Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon all parties listed on the official service list for this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30353 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO BUENROSTRO-BRAMBILA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting 

Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73418 

Agency No. A074-222-227 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 17, 2018**

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Buenrostro-Brambila, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion 

to reopen deportation proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73418 

§ 1252. We review de novo legal and constitutional claims, and we review for 

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 

F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition 

for review. 

The BIA did not err, abuse its discretion, or violate due process in denying 

Buenrostro-Brambila’s motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred, where it 

found that Buenrostro-Brambila had not provided an adequate basis to excuse the 

filing requirements. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) 

(the agency must consider the issues raised and express its decision “in terms 

sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive that it has heard and thought and 

not merely reacted” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Lata v. INS, 

204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (to prevail on a due process challenge, an 

alien must show error and prejudice). The record does not support BuenrostroBrambila’s contention that the BIA ignored evidence or arguments. See

Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990.

The court’s jurisdiction to review the BIA’s sua sponte determination is 

limited to reviewing the reasoning behind the decision for legal or constitutional 

error, and Buenrostro-Brambila has not established any error. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 

840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 15

                          Accountants' Acknowledgment

Footstar, Inc.
Mahwah, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:  Registration Statements Numbers 33-20731 and 33-30011 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 16, 1997 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                     /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
November 10, 1997
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1)  Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-39275, 333-49020, 333-60598, 333-60962, 333-71524, 333-85801,333-91949 and 333-100301) of Cygnus, Inc., (2)  Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-18357, 333-46084, 333-67331, 333-89377, and 333-91518)pertaining to the Amended 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Amended 1999 Stock IncentivePlan of Cygnus, Inc.,
of our report dated January 27, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cygnus, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP         
Palo Alto, California
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1496

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize the registration

of aliens on criminal probation or criminal parole.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1993

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. CANADY, and Mr. COBLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize

the registration of aliens on criminal probation or criminal parole.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING REGISTRATION OF ALIENS ON

4 CRIMINAL PROBATION OR CRIMINAL PA5 ROLE.

6 Section 263(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1303(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘and (5)’’

8 and inserting ‘‘(5) aliens who are or have been on criminal
2

•HR 1496 IH

1 probation or criminal parole within the United States, and

2 (6)’’.

Æ
#### STONE v. STATE.

No. 19930.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1938.

Guy H. McNeely and Bert Edw. Der-den, both of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for speeding, with an automobile; penalty assessed at a fine of $75.

The complaint and information appear regular. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error having been perceived, the judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit
      No. 32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Photonix, Inc. (the “ Company ” )
      on Form
      10-K for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ” ),
      I,
      Robin Risser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June 30, 2008


/s/
                Robin RisserRobin
                RisserChief
                Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,518,049
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,417,255
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,421,479
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         788,794
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           789,000
<LOANS>                                    162,375,541
<ALLOWANCE>                                (1,079,244)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             172,873,536
<DEPOSITS>                                  91,662,998
<SHORT-TERM>                                16,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            997,946
<LONG-TERM>                                 38,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,190,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             172,873,536
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,041,226
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              229,885
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                43,493
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,314,584
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,041,273
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,812,290
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,502,294
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   58,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                749,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                808,371
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     493,741
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   493,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.61
<LOANS-NON>                                    855,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           (1,027,300)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   (4,000)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          (1,079,244)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,030
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             49
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1663

XIE LEI CHENG,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-683-108)

Submitted: December 14, 2005 Decided: January 5, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Rod J.

Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Kristine L. Sendek-Smith,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Xie Lei Cheng, a native and citizen of the People’s

Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s

denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Cheng challenges the

determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for

asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Cheng fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he

seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the denial of Cheng’s request for

withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for

withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the

facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is

ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of

removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Cheng fails to show that he
- 3 -

is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal. 

We also find that substantial evidence supports the

finding that Cheng fails to meet the standard for relief under the

Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant

must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she

would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.”

8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2005). We find that Cheng failed to make

the requisite showing before the immigration court.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30552]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3481]


Bureau of Nonproliferation; Determination Under the Arms Export 
Control Act

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 654(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Department of State has 
made a determination pursuant to Section 73 of the Arms Export Control 
Act. The Department has concluded that publication of the determination 
would be harmful to the national security of the United States.

    Dated: November 21, 2000.
Robert J. Einhorn,
Assistant Secretary of State for Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-30552 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-U