alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3484] 

# Department:

United States Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Draftsman's Art: Master Drawings from the National Gallery of Scotland” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Frick Collection, New York, NY, from on or about December 11, 2000, through on or about February 25, 2001, and The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX, from on or about March 16, 2001 through on or about June 10, 2001 is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001. 

Dated: November 22, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-30555 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KELVTN FRAzTER, #099699

Plaintiff,

No.3:22-cv-2420-C

TEXAS INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant

AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RE,COMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGIS TE JUDGE

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United

States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this civil action should be dismissed for

lack of jurisdiction. Objections were filed. Said objections are OVERRULED.

The court has reviewed de noyo those portions ofthe proposed findings, conclusions,

and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error' Finding no eror, the Coun

ACCEPTS the Findings, conclusions, and Recommendation as the findings and conclusions of

the court. For the reason state therein, the court ORDERS that this civil action be DISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

Dated January 2023.

S R. CU INGS

$

$

$

s

$

$

s

$

$

SENIOR UNII- ar"r7 DI CT JUDGE

l/

Case 3:22-cv-02420-C-BK Document 15 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1729 BASIL F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BILL CLINTON, President, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 98-1733 BASIL F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BILL BLACK; LARRY SEIGLER; JOHN SHERIDAN; TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees.2 No. 98-1756 BASIL F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HARRY COX, Defendant - Appellee.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-162-3, CA-98-163-3, CA-98-164) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Basil F. Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Basil F. Graham filed three civil actions. In No. 98-1729, Graham filed a complaint against President Clinton, and in No. 98- 1733 and 98-1756, Graham filed a complaint against his former employers. The district court dismissed each complaint without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. Clinton , No. CA-98-162-3; Graham v. Black , No. CA-98-163-3; Graham v. Cox, No. CA-98-164 (E.D. Va. May 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1745 

To revise the boundaries of a John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Unit in Topsail, North Carolina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2017 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of a John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System Unit in Topsail, North Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall make such corrections to the map described in sub7 section (b) as are necessary to exclude lots from Coastal 

8 Barrier Resources System Unit L06 in North Topsail 

9 Beach that are serviced by infrastructure (as described in 

10 section 4(g)(1)(B) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1745 IS

1 (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B))) installed along North Caro2 lina Highway 210 and New River Inlet Road. 

3 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map referred to in sub4 section (a) is a map that— 

5 (1) is included in a set of maps as part of the 

6 John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

7 Digital Mapping Pilot Project entitled ‘‘John H. 

8 Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated 

9 November 20, 2013; and 

10 (2) relates to unit L06 of the Coastal Barrier 

11 Resources System. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
S. 167 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate a National Memorial to Fallen Educators at the National Teachers 

Hall of Fame in Emporia, Kansas. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Memorial to Fallen 

Educators Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The memorial to fallen educators located 

at the National Teachers Hall of Fame in Emporia, Kansas, is 

designated as the ‘‘National Memorial to Fallen Educators’’. 

(b) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The national memorial designated by this section is not a unit of the National Park System 

and the designation of the National Memorial to Fallen Educators 

shall not require or permit Federal funds to be expended for any 

purpose related to that national memorial. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Stanley ORR et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. S. M. N. MARRS et al., Defendants in Error.

No. 18892.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 6, 1932.

Woolworth & Baker, of Carthage, for plaintiffs in error.

Brachfield & Wolfe, of Henderson, for defendants in error.

PEE CURIAM.

The question as to whether or not the bonds Involved in this suit could have been abrogated or canceled by authority of an election and vote of the people, held for that purpose, is not before us, and we express no opinion upon that question. We have therefore dismissed the application for writ of error under the statute for want of jurisdiction.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1590

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-(N,N-dibenzylglycyl)-salicylamide; 2-

[N-benzyl-N-tert-butylamino]-4′-hydroxy-3′-hydroxymethylacetophenone

hydrochloride; Flutamide; and Loratadine.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. ARCHER (for himself and Mr. SUNDQUIST) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-(N,N-dibenzylglycyl)-

salicylamide; 2-[N-benzyl-N-tert-butylamino]-4′-hydroxy3′-hydroxymethylacetophenone hydrochloride; Flutamide;

and Loratadine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1590 IH

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSIONS ON DUTY ON 5-(N,N2 DIBENZYLGLYCYL)-SALICYLAMIDE; 2-[N3 BENZYL-N-TERT-BUTYLAMINO]-4′-HYDROXY-3′-

4 HYDROXYMETHYLACETOPHENONE HYDRO5 CHLORIDE; FLUTAMIDE; AND LORATADINE.

6 That subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar7 iff Schedules of the United States is amended by inserting

8 in numerical sequence the following new subheadings:
3

HR 1590 IH

‘‘ 9902.31.12 5-(N,N-dibenzylglycyl)-salicylamide (LBH-B/C, CAS No. 30566–92–8) (provided for in subheading

2924.29.4400) ............................................................................................................................................................. Free No Change No Change On Or Before

12/31/96

9902.31.13 2-(N-benzyl-N-tert-butylamino]-4′-hydroxy-3′-hydroxymethylacetophenone hydrochloride (Glycyl Hydrochloride,

CAS No. 24085–08–3) (provided for in subheading 2922.50.3000) .......................................................................... Free No Change No Change On Or Before

12/31/96

9902.31.14 Flutamide (CAS No. 13311–84–7) (provided for in subheading 2924.29.3950) ....................................................... Free No Change No Change On Or Before

12/31/96

9902.31.15 Loratadine (CAS No. 79794–75–5) (provided for in subheading 2933.90.2600) ...................................................... Free No Change No Change On Or Before

12/31/96 ’’.
4

HR 1590 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by the first section of this Act

3 applies with respect to articles entered or withdrawn from

4 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

5 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of MBNA Corporation

|                                 |  |               
|-------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Name                             |  | Incorporated  
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|MBNA America Bank, N.A           |  | United States 
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|MBNA America (Delaware), N.A     |  | United States 
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|MBNA International Bank Limited* |  | United Kingdom
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|MBNA Canada Bank*                |  | Canada        



|* |  | A subsidiary of MBNA America Bank, N.A.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Date: November 20, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Thomas R. Oxenreiter
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Thomas R. Oxenreiter    
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 87 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 87

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2010

 Mr. Neugebauer (for himself, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Bartlett, 
  Mr. Issa, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Akin, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Brown of 
South Carolina, Mr. Posey, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Bishop of Utah, 
Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. 
  Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Lamborn) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Any bill, resolution, or other legislative measure 
changing the internal revenue laws shall require for final adoption in 
each House the concurrence of two-thirds of the Members of that House 
voting and present, unless that bill, resolution, or other legislative 
measure is determined at the time of adoption, in a reasonable manner 
prescribed by law, not to increase the internal revenue by more than a 
de minimis amount. For the purposes of determining any increase in the 
internal revenue under this section, there shall be excluded any 
increase resulting from the lowering of an effective rate of any tax. 
On any vote for which the concurrence of two-thirds is required under 
this article, the yeas and nays of the Members of either House shall be 
entered on the Journal of that House.
    ``Section 2. The Congress may waive the requirements of this 
article when a declaration of war is in effect. The Congress may also 
waive this article when the United States is engaged in military 
conflict which causes an imminent and serious threat to national 
security and is so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a 
majority of the whole number of each House, which becomes law. Any 
increase in the internal revenue enacted under such a waiver shall be 
effective for not longer than two years.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2006067EN.01S00201.xml

| 8.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/s2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/s2

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1147

To extend until January 1, 1999, the existing suspension of duty on certain

unimproved wools.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1993

Mr. MOAKLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1999, the existing suspension

of duty on certain unimproved wools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSION

4 ON CERTAIN UNIMPROVED WOOLS.

5 Heading 9902.51.01 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

7 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/98’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection

10 (b), the amendment made by section 1 applies with respect
2

•HR 1147 IH

1 to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for con2 sumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the

3 enactment of this Act.

4 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec5 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

6 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro7 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

8 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

9 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend10 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

11 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

12 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en13 actment of this Act;

14 and with respect to which there would have been a lower

15 duty if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to

16 such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or

17 reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had oc18 curred on such 15th day.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1750 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1750

  To protect American job creation by striking the Federal mandate on 
                  employers to offer health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2017

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To protect American job creation by striking the Federal mandate on 
                  employers to offer health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Job Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECT JOB CREATION.

    (a) Repeal of Shared Responsibility Payment for Employers Regarding 
Health Coverage.--
            (1) In general.--Chapter 43 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 is amended by striking section 4980H (and the item 
        relating to such section in the table of sections for such 
        chapter).
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 1513 of the Patient 
        Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by striking 
        subsection (c).
            (3) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply to months after December 31, 2016.
    (b) Repeal of Reporting of Employer Health Insurance Coverage.--
            (1) In general.--Subpart D of part III of subchapter A of 
        chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
        striking section 6056 (and the item relating to such section in 
        the table of sections for such subpart).
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply to periods beginning after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1, 2019

s1029t 

# Order

Clerk November 1, 2019

160233

SC: 160233

In re WRIGHT, Minors. COA: 346194

Oakland CC Family Division:

2016

- 847902

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Amendment to 1999 Equity Incentive Plan



 










EXHIBIT 10.1




CABOT CORPORATION

1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




Amendment




     Pursuant to the terms of the Cabot Corporation 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”),
Cabot Corporation, as authorized by its Board of Directors on January 14, 2005, hereby
amends the Plan to add a new Section 8.10 to the Plan, which reads as follows:



“Section 8.10. Operation of Plan in accordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code.





The Plan will be operated in a manner consistent with a good-faith, reasonable
interpretation of Section 409A of the Code and applicable guidance thereunder, as
determined by the Committee in its discretion. Each Award subject to Section 409A of
the Code will be structured accordingly, and any action taken with respect to any
such Award will be construed and administered consistent with the intent that such
Award comply with the requirements of Section 409A.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Cabot Corporation has caused this instrument of amendment to be
executed as of January 14, 2005 by a duly authorized officer.



	 	 	 
	

	 	CABOT CORPORATION
	 
	 	 
	

	 	By: /s/ Robby D. Sisco
	

	 	Name: Robby D. Sisco

Title: Vice President
LAWRENCE ALBERTIE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5507

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 2, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

Lawrence Albertie, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.