alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### H. M. COHEN LUMBER & BUILDING CO. v. McCALLA, Judge.

No. 11133.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

Aug. 1, 1940.

Woodul, Arterbury & Folk and Roy L. Arterbury, all of Houston, for relator.

Wood, Morrow, Gresham & McCorquo-dale, M. S. McCorquodale, and Sam Levy, all of Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Relator herein sues- the Judge of 'the 127th District Court of Harris County, Hon. Kenneth McCalla, alone, in an original application to this court for a writ of mandamus to compel him to so change the records in his court in cause No. 243,976, wherein Steve Panos is plaintiff, H. M. Cohen Lumber & Building Company, relator herein, is a defendant, H. Charney is a defendant, N. D. Dobbins is a defendant, Maryland Casualty Company is a defendant, and Maryland Casualty Company is a cross-plaintiff, as to reflect that relator’s original motion for a new trial in such cause below was actually filed there on June 6 of 1940, instead of on June 1 of 1940, and to consider relator’s amended motion for a new trial in that cause, which was filed on June 22 of 1940, as a duly and regularly filed instrument in that proceeding.

It is obvious that, the other parties in such cause No. 243,976 are vitally interested in the controversy to which such application for mandamus relates, and that each of them is a necessary party to such a proceeding; wherefore, since no one of such parties is before this court, it becomes plain that the application is fatally defective for the want of them all as the necessary parties thereto.

The petition will accordingly be dismissed, without prejudice to the right of relator to again present the same to this court with all necessary parties included. Williams v. Wray, 123 Tex. 466, 72 S.W.2d 577; Goebel v. Carter, 124 Tex. 314, 77 S.W.2d 215; Kelly v. Lobit, Tex.Civ.App., 134 S.W.2d 428.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss for want of necessary parties granted and petition dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Bernard Beikirch et al., Respondents, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Greece, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The fact that petitioners keep a miniature horse in their house does not make the house a "stable” within the meaning of the zoning ordinance. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.— art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,147,810
<SECURITIES>                                16,292,106
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,248,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                   208,577
<INVENTORY>                                  3,461,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,501,406
<PP&E>                                       6,122,302
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,385,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,432,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,436,250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       158,250
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,838,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,432,982
<SALES>                                     10,179,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,469,424
<CGS>                                        3,309,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,687,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  98
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,585,677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   118,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,704,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,704,291)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1735 

To limit the removal of a special counsel, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2017 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To limit the removal of a special counsel, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Counsel Inde5 pendence Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON REMOVAL OF SPECIAL COUNSEL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—A special counsel appointed by the 

8 Attorney General, or any other official appointed by the 

9 Attorney General who exercises a similar degree of inde10 pendence from the normal Department of Justice chain 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1735 IS

1 of command, may only be removed if the Attorney General 

2 files an action in the United States District Court for the 

3 District of Columbia and files a contemporaneous notice 

4 of the action with the Committee on the Judiciary of the 

5 Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House 

6 of Representatives. 

7 (b) REQUIREMENT.—Any action filed under sub8 section (a) shall be heard and determined by a court of 

9 3 judges in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 

10 of title 28, United States Code, and any appeal shall lie 

11 to the Supreme Court. 

12 (c) REMOVAL FOR CAUSE.—A special counsel or 

13 other appointed official described in subsection (a) may 

14 be removed only after the court has issued an order find15 ing misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of 

16 interest, or other good cause, including violation of policies 

17 of the Department of Justice. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-K of PetroQuest Energy, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
   /s/ J.
Bond Clement
Amendment #4 to the BP, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 
 TO THE 
 BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 
 1997 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN, 
 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED ON JANUARY 24, 2000 

 
 The Boston Properties, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), as amended and restated on January 24, 2000, as subsequently amended, is hereby further amended, by action of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Boston Properties, Inc. at a meeting
of the Committee duly called and held on March 30, 2005, as follows: 
  
 Section 3(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph at the end thereof: 
  
 “The Administrator may also adjust the number of Shares subject to the Stock Options and the exercise prices thereof to take into
consideration payment of an extraordinary cash dividend by the Company to its stockholders if it is determined by the Administrator that such adjustment is appropriate to avoid adverse impact to the optionees.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned certifies that the Amendment set forth
above was adopted by the Committee on March 30, 2005. 
  

	
	 /s/    FRANK D. BURT


	Frank D. Burt, Secretary
Case 4:22-cr-00194-O Document 65 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 219
Case 4:22-cr-00194-O Document 65 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 220
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 233 (Monday, December 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License #09/09-0386]


First Commerce & Loan, L.P.; Notice of License Surrender

    Notice is hereby given that First Commerce & Loan, L.P. (``First 
Commerce''), an Arizona limited partnership, has surrendered its 
license to operate as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''). First 
Commerce was licensed by the Small Business Administration on October 
19, 1990.
    Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the 
regulations promulgated thereunder, the surrender of the license was 
accepted on November 9, 2000, and accordingly, all rights, privileges, 
and franchises derived therefrom have been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59-011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)
    Dated: November 28, 2000.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 00-30777 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1567

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt

interest shall not be taken into account in determining the portion

of social security benefits subject to income taxation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 31, 1993

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that tax-exempt interest shall not be taken into account

in determining the portion of social security benefits

subject to income taxation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) paragraph (2) of section 86(b) of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining modified adjusted gross

5 income) is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(2) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—

7 For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘modified

8 adjusted gross income’ means adjusted gross income
2

•HR 1567 IH

1 determined without regard to this section and sec2 tions 135, 911, 931, and 933.’’

3 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

4 apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.

Æ
### Regulatory Evaluation

D ocket No. FAA- Directorate Iden ti fi er: -A D

Add th e 

### 1rork hours. ports r.:os t , and nwnher 

### < ?/ U.S

. regis tered products t o th e tuhle hel mr. 1Vhen yo u ore fiuished. d ic k o n the .. U pclute Fi e ld s · · hull on to awomati cally/111 in the total s. 

### Update Fields 

# I

Estimated Costs: Action Costs p er Pro du ct (e.g. , aircraft , engine, (e.g., Inspection , propeller , applia nce) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacem ent) ( in clude cost ( labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. F l eet Do not includ e onco ndition cos t s here access, test in g, (@$85/h parts) Regi ste r e d and cl ose-up) our ) Products Installation and 

### 119.0 $3,780 133 X I modification ) I I Inspection of Left & Right Engine MOV I 

### 0 13 3 I Actua tor s (concunent req uirem e nts) I} 'I ( ill 

# "l
I' (,' If I 

## :• I


# . I 

## ,, I II :} I I I II J1 l r . , { l ll( 0 I 1
. {I I •I I · I' I l (

**~** ) t;l I I) 

## ''" 0 I h • I II

. , I

,, i

(J (:( I I If I I I II fJI )(1 1'(1 ( rl(

The k n ow n numb er of products in comp li ance:

**;-...;untb~·~** Total Costs of compliance for 

### U.S. fle et: $1,859 ,34 0 Costs covered und er warranty (if/mown)

**\\'arrant~** On-Condition Cos t s:



# ~ Act io n Wo rk-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Pro d uc t (e.g. , Inspection , (include access, (@$85 /hour)

replacem e nt) testing , and c loseup)

### R eplacement of Left & 

### R

ight Engine MOV 

### 105 $10, 954 Actuators ·, 0 1){ \ 

### " '\ II I II 011 

### S p ec ial consideration s for Eco nomic Analysis (Use this field to explain anythin g in th e Estimated Costs ta ble tha t was assumed or mi gh t not be obv ious. Thisfield can a l so b e used to explain warranty cos ts ) : 

### Concurrent require ments and on-cond iti on costs associated with Boe in g SB 777 -28A00 34 are limited to the 2 MOV actuators impacted by thi s AD. S B 777 -28A00 34 i s appli cable up to II MOV actuato r s as required by AD 20 13-05-03. Execu tive Order 12866 : Co uld the AD be co nsidered a "s ignificant r egul atory



# act **on**

**·** YES* 

### 0 NO 

### IZJ *Exp lanation: DOT Regul a tory Polici es and Procedures: I s the AD significant? 

# 0 YES* 

### 0 NO 

### 181 *Exp lanation: R eg ulatory Flexibility Act: Wi ll the AD hav e a sign ifi ca nt econo mic impa ct on a s ub s tantial number of s mall entities? Explain for ei th er a Yes or No an swer.



# ~ YES 

### 0 NO 

### 181 Exp l anation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD cou ld affect in trastate aviatio n in Alaska. I s it appropria te to includ e s pecifi c requirements for a ircraft operated in Ala s ka where av iation mi g ht be the onl y m ode of tran sportation?



# ~ YES* 

### 0 NO 

### IZJ *Exp lanation:
Exhibit 99.1

                         PEOPLEVIEW, INC.

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of PeopleView, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Joseph Flynn, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and
(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph Flynn
---------------------------------------
Joseph Flynn
Principal Executive Officer
November 12, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to PeopleView, Inc. and will be retained by
PeopleView, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of MBNA Corporation, and in the related Prospectuses, of our report
dated January 14, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
MBNA Corporation, included in the 1999 Annual Report to Stockholders of MBNA
Corporation and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1999:

         Number   33-41936    on Form S-8 dated July 22, 1991

         Number   33-41895    on Form S-8 dated July 24, 1991

         Number   33-50498    on Form S-3 (as amended by Post-Effective
                               Amendment No. 1) dated August 28, 1992

         Number   33-71640    on Form S-8 dated November 15, 1993

         Number   33-76278    on Form S-3 (as amended by Amendment No. 1) dated
                               April 8, 1994

         Number   33-95438    on Form S-8 dated August 4, 1993

         Number   33-95600    on Form S-3 (as amended by Pre-Effective
                               Amendment No. 1) dated September 1, 1995

         Number   333-17187   on Form S-3  dated December 3, 1996

         Number   333-15721   on form S-3 (as amended by Amendment No. 2) dated
                               December 10, 1996

         Number   333-21181   on Form S-4 (as amended by Amendment No. 1)
                               dated February 25, 1997

         Number   333-06824   on Form S-8 dated April 22, 1997

         Number   333-47179   on Form S-3 dated April 6, 1998

         Number   333-74919   on Form S-3 dated March 24, 1999

         Number   333-79987   on Form S-8 dated June 4, 1999



Baltimore, Maryland
March 17, 2000
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1509

To provide for full statutory wage adjustments for prevailing rate employees,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1993

Mr. HOCHBRUECKNER (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. OBERSTAR, Ms. PELOSI,

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mrs. UNSOELD, Mr. MINETA, Mr. MILLER of

California, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BONIOR,

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr.

ENGLE, Mr. DELUGO, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

A BILL

To provide for full statutory wage adjustments for prevailing

rate employees, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevailing Wage Rate

5 Adjustment Reform Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. WAGE RATES.

7 Without regard to any other provision of law limiting

8 the amounts payable—
2

•HR 1509 IH

1 (1) to a prevailing rate employee, as defined

2 under section 5342(a)(2) of title 5, United States

3 Code;

4 (2) to an employee covered by section 5348 of

5 such title; or

6 (3) to any other employee subject to section

7 616 of the Treasury, Postal Service, and General

8 Government Appropriations Act, 1993 (Public Law

9 102–393; 106 Stat. 1768);

10 such employees shall be paid, beginning on the effective

11 date of each annual wage survey adjustment in the region

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act, wages as deter13 mined and established in accordance with the provisions

14 of subchapter IV of chapter 53, title 5, United States

15 Code.

Æ
In-Person Attendees: TV NOPR Test Procedures Meeting

Meeting Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Belt, Bill Senior Director, 

Technology & Standards

Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)

1919 S. Eads Street Arlington VA 22202 703-907-5249 703-907-76

Calwell, Chris Senior Research Fellow ECOVA 1199 Main Ave, # 242 Durango CO 81301 970-259-6801 

x 301

910-259-85

Christensen, Adam Staff Engineer Appliance Standards Awareness 

Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW, Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4002 202-429-22

Desroches, Louis-Benoit Program Manager Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL)

1 Cyclotron Road, Mailstop 90R4000

Berkeley CA 94720 510-486-5833 N/A 

Edwards, Brenda J. Program Support 

Specialist

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue SW

Washington DC 20585 202-596-2945 202-586-46

Farber, Julia Senior Specialist, Global 

Government Affairs

Underwriters Laboratories 1850 M St, NW

Suite 1000

Washington DC 20036 202-530-6162 N/A 

Goldberg, Adam Principal AGP, LLC 3003 Barkley Gate Ln Fairfax VA 22031 703-539-5081 N/A Johnson, Douglas K. Vice President, 

Technology Policy

Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)

1919 S. Eads Street Arlington VA 22202 703-907-7686 703-907-76

Malinowski, Mateusz (Matt)

Senior Associate ICF International 1725 Eye Street, NW

Suite 1000

Washington DC 20006 202-862-2693 202-862-11

Petrolati, Victor P Retired U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-586-4549 202-586-46

Radulovic, Verena N/A Environmental Protection Agency N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Rotolo, Anthony Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc., Suite 500 1200 19th St. NW Washington DC 20036 202-973-2434 202-973-24Schindler, Bill Display Industry 

Consultant

Verizon N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 

Sharp, Mark J. Group Manager

Corporate Environmental Department

Panasonic Corporation of North America

1130 Connecticut Avenue, NW,Suite 1100

Washington DC 20036 202-912-3800 

x 116

202-912-38

Sher, Celia M General Counsel Office of General Counsel - DOE 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-6122 N/A 

Stephens, Charlie Senior Energy Codes & 

Standards Engineer

Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA)

421 SW Sixth Avenue, Suite 600

Portland OR 97204 503-688-5457 503-688-54
In-Person Attendees: TV NOPR Test Procedures Meeting

Meeting Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Tsao, Allen Managing Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street, NW Washington DC 20036 202-481-8357 N/A Yoder, Christopher Senior Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 575 South Negley Ave Pittsburgh PA 15232 717-487-1610 N/A Zhumagali, Bizhan N/A ICF International 1725 1st Street, NW Washington DC 20850 202-862-1994 N/A