alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33960]


The Central Illinois Railroad Company--Lease and Operation 
Exemption--Lines of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway 
Company at Chicago, Cook County, IL

    The Central Illinois Railroad Company, a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to lease from The 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) approximately 
5.9 miles of main line track and approximately 12.47 miles of 
sidetrack, collectively referred to as the Lumber District and Illinois 
Northern lines or portions thereof, in the vicinity of BNSF's Western 
Avenue Yard in Chicago, Cook County, IL.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On November 20, 2000, a petition to stay the effective date 
of the exemption was filed by Joseph C. Szabo, on behalf of United 
Transportation Union-Illinois Legislative Board. The petition for 
stay was denied in The Central Illinois Railroad Company--Lease and 
Operation Exemption--Lines of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe 
Railway Company at Chicago, Cook County, IL, STB Finance Docket No. 
33960 (STB served Nov. 22, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated no earlier than 
November 23, 2000, the effective date of the exemption (7 days after 
the exemption was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33960, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Thomas F. McFarland, Jr., Esq., McFarland & Herman, 20 North 
Wacker Drive, Suite 1330, Chicago, IL 60606-2902.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: November 27, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30655 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 88

 Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
for cooperation between the United States and Australia pursuant to the 
                       Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2010

    Mr. Berman (for himself and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) (both by request) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
for cooperation between the United States and Australia pursuant to the 
                       Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does favor 
the proposed agreement for cooperation transmitted to the Congress by 
the President on May 5, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,718-01

EX P ARTE DAVID LEN MOULTON, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2008F 00339-A IN THE 5TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM CASS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to six ty year s’ imprisonment. The Six th Court of Appea ls reve rsed the judgme nt of conviction. Moulton v. State , 360 S.W .3d 540 (Tex. Ap p . — T ex arkana 2011). We reve rsed the judgme nt of the cour

t of appe als. Moulton v. State , 395 S.W .3d 804 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Applicant now contends, among other th i n gs , that trial counsel failed to object on Confrontation Clause grounds when aff idavits the medical examiner relied on were rea d to the jury , reque st a limit ing instruction afte r the aff idavits wer e rea d to the jury , and reque st a continuance afte r2

the State disclosed the a ffidavits duringtrial. On J une 22, 2016, we rema nded this application for a second response from trial counsel and further finding s of fact and conclusions of law. On Februar y 8, 2017, we r ece ived the trial c ourt’s

s upplemental finding s and conclusions, but counsel’s response was not forwa rded with th e 1 supplemental rec ord. Acc ording ly , the trial court shall order the District Clerk to forwa rd counsel’s response to this C ourt. This application will be h el d in abeyance . Counsel’s response shall be forwa rded to this Court within 30 day s of the d at e o f th i s o rder. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained from thi s Court.

Filed: Mar ch 1, 2017 Do not publish

Acc ordingto the supplemental finding s and conc lusions, counsel filed a se cond 1 aff idavit and a suppleme nt to that affidavit.
MANUFACTURERS BANK
A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SAKURA BANK, LIMITED


                                  EXHIBIT 10.6

                           NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

THIS NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT is entered into as of February 7, 1997 , by and
between  MANUFACTURERS  BANK, a California  banking  corporation  ("Bank"),  and
PUBLIC STORAGE  PROPERTIES XVII, INC.  (hereinafter  referred to as "Borrower"),
and is made with reference to the following facts and circumstances:

1.   Borrower  has made and  executed in favor of Bank a  Promissory  Note dated
     February 24, 1995, in the original principal amount of Five Million Dollars
     ($5,000,000.00) (the "Note").

2.   The principal sum of Five Million  Seven  Hundred  Fifty  Thousand  Dollars
     ($5,750,000.00),  together  with any accrued and unpaid  interest  thereon,
     remains outstanding and unpaid with respect to the Note.

3.    Borrower and Bank wish to modify the Note as set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

               3.1 Section 2 of the Note is  modified  by  deleting  the date of
January 1, 1997, and replacing it with a new date of February 1, 1997.

4. Except as modified herein,  the Note shall remain in full force and effect in
   accordance with its original terms and conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Note Modification  Agreement
as of the day and year first above written.


Date:   February 7, 1997

                                         PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES XVII, INC.,
                                         a California corporation


                                         By:  /s/David P. Singelyn
                                            ---------------------------------

                                         Title:   Vice President/Controller
                                               -----------------------------


                                          MANUFACTURERS BANK,
                                          a California banking corporation


                                          By :  /s/ James L. Bradley
                                              ----------------------

                                          Title:   Vice President
                                                -------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Set forth below is a list of all subsidiaries of Burlington Industries, Inc.
(the "Company")* and, as to each person named, the percentage of voting
securities owned, or other bases of control, by its immediate parent.

                                                       Percentage of Voting
                                      State or         Power Represented by
                                    Jurisdiction       Securities Owned by
                                         of            the Company on
       Name                         Incorporation      September 29, 2001
-----------------------            --------------      ---------------------

B.I. Funding, Inc.                    Delaware                100%

Burlington Apparel Services
 Company                              Delaware                100%

Burlington Fabrics Inc.               Delaware                100%

Insuratex, Ltd.                       Bermuda                 100%

Textiles Morelos, S.A. de C.V.        Mexico                  100%

Burlington Yecapixtla, S.A. de C.V.   Mexico                  100%


___________________________
*        The names of 23 domestic subsidiaries and 15 foreign subsidiaries of
         the Company have been omitted because, considered in the aggregate,
         they would not constitute a significant subsidiary. All of the
         foregoing subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
         statements of the Company.
VII

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1516

For the relief of Earl B. Chappell, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1993

Mr. PICKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Earl B. Chappell, Jr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM TO EARL B. CHAPPELL, JR.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the

6 sum of $53,773.23 to Earl B. Chappell, Jr., of Virginia

7 Beach, Virginia. The sum represents interest on the

8 amount erroneously deducted from the backpay paid to

9 Earl B. Chappell, Jr., in November 1974 pursuant to his

10 reinstatement to a civil service position with the United

11 States Navy and not remitted to him until February 19,

12 1986. Payment of the sum shall fully satisfy any claim
2

•HR 1516 IH

1 Earl B. Chappell, Jr., has against the United States for

2 damages relating to the amount deducted from his back3 pay award.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS FEES.

5 No amount exceeding 10 percent of the payment

6 made under section 1 shall be paid to or received by any

7 agent or attorney in consideration for services rendered

8 in connection with the payment. Any person who violates

9 this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be

10 subject to a fine in the amount provided under title 18,

11 United States Code.

Æ
#### HURST v. STATE.

No. 15633.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1933.

Hughes & Monroe, of Dallas, for appellant.

Bloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft; punishment two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

*122We observe no fundamental error in the record. It is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: Mary Beth Steisslinger <mb.steisslinger@gmail.com>

Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:54 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: Close the TRI Loophole for Oil and Gas

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Dear Mr. Mears, 

Close the TRI Loophole that the oil and gas industry currently enjoys. We all deserve to know exactly what these 

operations are releasing into our air, water and onto our land. Our goal is to guarantee the public’s right to know. 

Thank you for standing with the people and not covering up for big profits for big business at the expense of our health 

and that of our children and grandchildren. 

Mary Beth Steisslinger 

831 N. Sheridan Ave. 

Pittsburgh, PA 15206
PROMEDCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
EXHIBIT 11

Computation of Per Share Earnings

(All amounts are expressed in thousands, except for earnings per share)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                                      March 31,
                                                                                2000             1999
<S>                                                                          <C>              <C>
BASIC

     Weighted average shares outstanding                                          22,076            21,044
     Contingently issuable shares in business
         combinations                                                              -                   413
                                                                              ----------       -----------
     Number of common shares outstanding                                          22,076            21,457
                                                                              ==========       ===========
DILUTED

     Weighted average shares outstanding                                          22,076            21,044
     Contingently issuable shares in business
         combinations                                                              -                   413
     Net common shares issuable on exercise of certain
         stock options and warrants (1)                                            1,190             1,736
     Other dilutive securities (2)                                                   742               547
                                                                              ----------       -----------
     Number of common shares outstanding                                          24,008            23,740
                                                                              ==========       ===========
Net income                                                                   $     2,993         $   3,734

Interest expense, net of tax assuming conversion of
         convertible subordinated notes payable                                       67                67
                                                                              ----------       -----------
                                                                             $     3,060         $   3,801
                                                                              ==========       ===========
</TABLE>



(1)  Net common  shares  issuable  on  exercise  of certain  stock  options  and
     warrants are calculated based on the treasury stock method.

(2)  Other dilutive securities are calculated based on the if-converted method.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128960 Marilyn Kelly 128961 Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128960, 128961 

 COA: 259800, 259801 

Wayne CC: 87-006179,

JAMES HILL, 87-008997, 88-008852

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2005 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
# Az Európai Unió C 42A/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 42A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 60. évfolyam2017. február 9. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 42A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

60. évfolyam2017. február 9.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Hirdetmények |
| | KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK |
| | Eurojust |
| 2017/C 42 A/01 | Pályázat az Eurojust adminisztratív igazgatójának (AD 14 besorolás) álláshelyére – Hága (Hollandia) – 17/EJ/01 | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

V   Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Eurojust

2017/C 42 A/01

Pályázat az Eurojust adminisztratív igazgatójának (AD 14 besorolás) álláshelyére – Hága (Hollandia) – 17/EJ/01

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

V Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Eurojust

| 9.2.2017 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2017

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 42/1

---

Pályázat az Eurojust adminisztratív igazgatójának (AD 14 besorolás) álláshelyére – Hága (Hollandia) – 17/EJ/01

(2017/C 042 A/01)

Az Eurojust pályázatot hirdet az Eurojust adminisztratív igazgatói állásra. Az Eurojust 2002-ben jött létre, hogy növelje a tagállamok illetékes hatóságainak hatékonyságát a súlyos, határokon átnyúló és szervezett bűnözéssel szemben. Az Eurojust ügyészekből, bírákból vagy velük azonos hatáskörű rendőrtisztekből áll, akik kollégiumként felelősek annak szervezéséért és működéséért. A működést az adminisztratív igazgató által irányított személyzet támogatja. Az adminisztratív igazgató felel az Eurojust napi igazgatásáért és a humán erőforrás menedzsmentért, a Kollégium elnökének felügyelete alatt. Az Eurojust honlapján megtalálható a részletes pályázati kiírás és a felvételi eljárás:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

A jelentkezési határidő 2017. március 17. éjfél (közép-európai idő szerint).

---
January 30, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GLORIA WISMER, INDIV IDUALLY AND AS TRUST EE OF GLORIA

WISMER LIVING TRUST , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00026

- CV V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the cour t below on October 10, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 39 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.39
                                                Agreed to March 17, 2009

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On June 5, 2009, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 2009 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credits Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the "Partnership") for the period ended December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 14, 2003




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credits Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the "Partnership") for the period ended December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 14, 2003