alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited
Partnership ("MCV") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Rajewski, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and
Controller of MCV, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, aS adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of MCV.




 /s/ James M. Rajewski
------------------------------------------
James M. Rajewski
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Controller
March 25, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


North American Wetlands Conservation Council (Council) Meeting 
Announcement

AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Council will meet at 1 p.m., December 6, 2000, to select 
North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) proposals for 
recommendation to the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission. The 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: December 6, 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of the 
Interior, South Penthouse, 1849 C St., NW, Washington, DC 20240. The 
Council Coordinator is located at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 
N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 110, Arlington, Virginia, 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Smith, Council Coordinator, 
(703) 358-1784.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with NAWCA (Pub. L. 101-233, 
103 Stat. 1968, December 13, 1989, as amended), the State-private-
Federal Council meets to consider wetland acquisition, restoration, 
enhancement and management projects for recommendation to, and final 
funding approval by, the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission. 
Proposals require a minimum of 50 percent non-Federal matching funds.

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
Jamie Rappaport Clark,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 00-30455 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
#### STANLEY v. STATE.

No. 21899.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1942.

Curtis Douglass, of Pampa, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*786DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is possession of whiskey in a container to which no stamp was affixed showing the payment of the tax due the State; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The jurat affixed to the complaint and affidavit of H. B. Stanley, upon which the information was based, is as follows:

“Sworn to and subscribed by H. B. Stanley, a credible person, before me, on this the 21st day of August, A. D. One Thousand Nine Hundred and Forty-one.

> “Joe Gordon, Gray County, Texas.”

Such jurat is insufficient in that it does not show that the complaint was sworn to before an officer authorized to administer the oath required under the provisions of Art. 415, C. C. P. Stacy v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 499, 258 S.W. 475; Barrington v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 11, 32 S.W.2d 837; Shurbet v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 50, 60 S.W.2d 791; Sullivan v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 475, 69 S.W.2d 65.

A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information.

Inasmuch as the jurat may be amended, the prosecution will not be ordered dismissed.

The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<PAGE>

                 SIZZLER INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                  EXHIBIT 21


PARENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES
------------------------

James A. Collins, Chairman of the Board, owned of record and beneficially, at
June 30, 1999, 3,814,911 shares of the Company's common stock, representing
approximately 13 percent of the Company's total shares outstanding and may be
considered a "parent" of the Company as such term is defined by the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange commission under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.

Set forth below is a list of all of the Company's subsidiaries as of June 30,
1999:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           Jurisdiction of
            Name of Subsidiary             Incorporation
------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>
Buffalo Ranch Australia Pty, Ltd.             Australia
CFI Insurers, Ltd.                             Bermuda
Collins Finance and Management Pty, Ltd.      Australia
Collins Foods Australia Pty, Ltd.             Australia
Collins Foods International, Pty, Ltd.          Nevada
Collins International, Inc.                    Delaware
Collins Properties, Inc.                       Delaware
Collins Property Development Pty, Ltd.        Australia
Curly's of Springfield, P.A., Inc.           Pennsylvania
Dalton's Roadhouse, Inc.                      California
Furnace Concepts Australia Corp.                Nevada
Furnace Concepts International, Inc.            Nevada
Gulliver's Australia Pty, Ltd.                Australia
Josephina's, Inc.                             California
Restaurant Concepts International, Inc.         Nevada
Restaurant Concepts of Australia Pty, Ltd.      Nevada
Scott's & Sizzler Ltd.                          Canada
Sizzler Australia Pty, Ltd.                   Australia
Sizzler Family Steak Houses, Inc.               Nevada
Sizzler Franchise Development, Ltd.            Bermuda
Sizzler Holdings of Canada, Inc.                Canada
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           Jurisdiction of
            Name of Subsidiary             Incorporation
-----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>
Sizzler International Marks, Inc.              Delaware
Sizzler New Zealand Limited                     Nevada
Sizzler of N.Y., Inc.                          New York
Sizzler Project Pty, Ltd.                     Australia
Sizzler Restaurant Services, Inc.               Nevada
Sizzler South Pacific Pty, Ltd.                 Nevada
Sizzler Southeast Asia, Inc.                    Nevada
Sizzler Steak Seafood Salad (S) Pte. Ltd.     Singapore
Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.                    Delaware
Sizzler USA Real Property, Inc.                Delaware
Sizzler USA Restaurants, Inc.                  Delaware
Sizzler USA. Inc.                              Delaware
Tenly Enterprises, Inc.                      Pennsylvania
</TABLE>
Andrew McCollough, Ph.D. Skyward Regulatory Services

Skyward IO, Inc. 233 SW Naito Parkway Suite 200 Portland, Or 97204 Tel (971) 303-9981

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx O ffi ce of the Secretary US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable Michael P. Huerta O ffi ce of the Administrator Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 July 21, 2015RE: Amendment to Exemption 11521 Skyward IO, Inc., Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014-0947 On May 11th, 2015, Skyward was issued Exemption No. 11521 (‘Exemption’) for the purpose of conducting UAS research and development related to the production of data and aerial data collection, etc., with the DJI Spreading Wings S1000, 3D Robotics X8, 3D Robotics Iris, DJI Phantom 2, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+. Skyward now requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow for additional UAS. Specifically, research and development of data and aerial data using the additional UAS listed, in compliance with the conditions as approved in Exemption 11521. We request an amendment to operate the following UAS under the same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption: the 3DR Solo, the Parrot Bebop, the DJI Inspire, and the DJI Phantom 3. Full descriptions and operating details for the additional UAS may be found in the attached UAS data sheets excerpted from the Skyward Manual. The attached UAS data sheets are submitted as confidential under the Freedom of Information Act 5 USC Sec. 552 et seq. We believe these operations, utilizing these UAS, are at least as safe as equivalent manned aviation operations for the following reasons. Skyward UASs, as amended, are all less than 55 lb., less than 1.5 m in largest dimension, and travel at less than 100 mph. Full descriptions are available in the attached Skyward GOM v 2.2. In addition, the following Exemptions have been granted for the same or similar aircraft types and commercial uses being requested in this amendment. Similar exemptions include 11062, 11109, 11112, 11213. Exemptions granted with the above SUAS include: (Solo) 11908, 11935, 11832, (Phantom 3) 11802, 11822, 11801, and (Inspire) 11063, 11279, 11341, and 11509. As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of research and development of data and aerial data using the additional UAS listed, Skyward respectfully submits2 that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. Please do not hesitate to contact Andrew McCollough, the Professional Services POC, via email at exemption@skyward.io if you have any questions or concerns.

Very Respectfully Yours,

Andrew McCollough, Ph.D. Skyward Regulatory Services
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or 
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief from Requirements

    Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroads have petitioned the Federal 
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance 
or modification of the signal system or relief from the requirements of 
49 CFR Part 236 as detailed below.

Docket No. FRA-2000-8041

    Applicant: CSX Transportation, Mr. E.G. Peterson, Assistant 
Chief Engineer, Signal Design and Construction, 4901 Belfort Road, 
Suite 130 (S/C J-370), Jacksonville, Florida 32256.

    CSX Transportation seeks approval of the proposed modification of 
the traffic control system, on the No. 2 main track, near Elk, West 
Virginia, milepost CA 455.5, Kanawha Subdivision, C&O Business Unit, 
consisting of the discontinuance and removal of absolute controlled 
signals 34R and 34L, associated with the previous removal of the No. 3 
switch.
    The reason given for the proposed changes is to eliminate 
facilities no longer needed in present day operation.
    Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an 
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the 
protest is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of the 
protestant in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest 
shall be furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
    All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified 
by the docket number and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401, Washington, D.C. 
20590-0001. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this 
notice will be considered by the FRA before final action is taken. 
Comments received after that date will be considered as far as 
practicable. All written communications concerning these proceedings 
are available for examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 
p.m.) at DOT Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401 (Plaza 
Level), 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590-0001. All 
documents in the public docket are also available for inspection and 
copying on the internet at the docket facility's Web site at 
http://dms.dot.gov.
    FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral 
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is 
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present 
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set 
for public hearing.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on November 27, 2000.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 00-30532 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-U
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1345 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 243

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1345

                          [Report No. 103-162]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 280 South First Street in 
    San Jose, California, as the ``Robert F. Peckham United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

             October 21 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 243
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1345

                          [Report No. 103-162]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 5 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

             October 21 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 280 South First Street in 
    San Jose, California, as the ``Robert F. Peckham United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 280 South First Street in San Jose, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert F. Peckham 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert F. Peckham 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### TAYLOR v. STATE.

No. 19737.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1938.

Rehearing Denied May 18,1938.

Gray & Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for the sale of intoxicating liquor in dry area; punishment, a fine of $150 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail.

The record fails to show that notice of appeal was given and entered upon the minutes of the trial court. In the absence of such a showing, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine matters *392sought to be presented for review. See Long v. State, 3 Tex.App. 321; Lenox v. State, 55 Tex.Cr.R. 259, 116 S.W. 816; Roberts v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 492, 269 S. W. 103; Article 827, C.C.P.

The attempted appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SOFTLOCK.COM, INC'S ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFEID IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         160,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               165,460
<PP&E>                                          44,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          187,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,556
<OTHER-SE>                                   (744,591)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,842
<SALES>                                        109,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,402
<CGS>                                           23,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  840,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (740,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (740,072)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (740,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (740,072)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Titanium  Metals  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), we,
Steven L. Watson,  Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  and Bruce P. Inglis,  Vice President Finance of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. the Quarterly  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.




May 4, 2006



/s/ Steven L. Watson
Steven L. Watson
Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Bruce P. Inglis
Bruce P. Inglis
Vice President Finance




Note:   The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
        "filed" for  purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
        1934,  as  amended,  or  otherwise  subject to the  liabilities  of that
        Section.  Registration  Statements  or other  documents  filed  with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by
        reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7114** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. DWAYNE MANNING, a/k/a Jonathan Manning, a/k/a Rude Dog , Defendant

- Appe llant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. ( 5:95

- cr - 00156

- H

- 1 )

Submitted : February 9 , 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Dwayne Manning, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dwayne Manning appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for return of property . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distric t court. United States v. Manning , No. 5:95

- cr - 00156

- H

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 233 (Monday, December 4, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-618-001]


U-T Offshore System, L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 28, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 21, 2000, U-T Offshore System, L.L.C. 
(UTOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an 
effective date of November 1, 2000:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 61
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 61-A

    UTOS states that the tendered sheets are filed in compliance with 
the Commission's October 27, 2000 Order in the referenced dockets, 
regarding the netting and trading of imbalances on UTOS' system.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30743 Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M