FORM A-1PARENT COMPANY INFORMATIONI. Parent Company / Legal Corporate Owner Information1. Legal Parent Company / Legal Corporate NameOwens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC2. AddressOne Owens Corning Parkway3. CityToledo4. StateOhio5. Zip Code436596. CountyLucas7. Size of Company (approximate number of employees includingall subsidiaries, branches, and related establishments owned):16,280FORM A-2FACILITY INFORMATIONII. Facility InformationFacility NameOwens Corning Insulating Systems, LLCFacility AddressStreet1825 West Battaglia RoadCityEloyStateArizonaZip Code85131CountyPinalFacility CoordinatesLatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)32.762360Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)-111.586830Specific location represented (e.g., front door of main building, centroidof property, etc.)Centroid of PropertyNumber of employees attached to the wool fiberglass manufacturingfacility:87Design capacity of the plant (tons/yr)Type(s) of process(es) (rotary spin, flame attenuation) at this plantRotary SpinOperation schedulehrs/day24days/yr365Identify what state and local air pollution rulesand regulations, includingpermit requirements, your plant is subject to. (Please provide copies ofpermit(s) and permit IDs)Applicable requirements referenced in State Operating PermitC30992.000. Provided on CD.III. Technical ContactNameMike PettisTechnical Contact TitleISB Environmental LeaderTelephone740-877-7087Facsimile (Fax)740-328-2696EmailMike.Pettis@owenscorning.comFORM A-2FACILITY INFORMATIONIV. OtherIs the facility a major source of HAP?NoIf No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoidclassification as a major source:NoDoes the facility manufacture other productsin addition to woolfiberglass?NoIf Yes, list the other products manufacturedat the facility.N/AAre there any HAP emissions associated with any co-located facilities?List unit operations, e.g., boiler, and pollutant/emissions.N/AFORM B-1PLANT OPERATIONSI. Overview of Plant OperationsNumber of process lines. Include lines that are currentlyoperational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Donotinclude lines permanently shutdown).1For each process line:Process Line 1Process line identification names or numbersEL-1Type of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Rotary SpinMaximum annual production rate (tons/yr)Age of process equipment (yrs) Not known. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Remaining economic life of process line (yrs) N/A.Continuedmaintenance canmaintain indefinite life.List of products produced and most recent annualproduction (tons/yr; specify year) for each productPlease attach detailed schematics of each process line. Provided on CD.FORM B-2PLANT OPERATIONSII. Process - Raw materials Handling and StorageMolten glass preparationRaw materials and proportions by wt (%) Industry information provided for representativeness.Soda ash (9%), Borax (12%), Cullet (34%), Limestone(9%) and Sand (31%).Method(s) of conveying each raw material to furnace/pots Batch raw materials are pneumatically conveyed tostorage silos. The batch raw materials are weighedandmixed in the batch house. The batch is thenpneumatically conveyed to a running bin that supplies thebatch to the melting furnaces.Binder and AdditivesList each raw material, including premixed materials, in the binderformulation and its proportion by wt (%)List steps in preparing binder, including storage temperature (°F)and holding time (hrs)The above listed binder ingredients are metered intobinder mix tanks. Mixed binder is transferred to arecirculating tank. All storage temperatures are ambient.Total holding time is approximately 45 minutes.Total yearly consumption of binder (gal/yr)Cost of binder ($/gal) for most recent year (specify year)Are binder storage and mixing tanks vented tooutside/inside? Binder mix and storage tanks are vented inside.Method of treating vent air from storage andmix tanksN/AEmission control during liquid raw material transfer from vehiclesto storage tanks.N/ADescribe future source reduction plans and schedules toreformulate binders; List each constituent, proportions wt (%), cost($/gal) for reformulationFORM B-3PLANT OPERATIONSIII. Process - Glass Melting FurnaceFor each Glass Melting Furnace:Furnace 1Furnace 2Process unit identification name/numberNorth MelterSouth MelterProcess line(s) served (identification name/number) EL-1 EL-1Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)32.7623332.7623575Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)-111.5872364-111.5872358Stack or vent height (units)36.0 ft.36.0 ft.Stack or vent diameter (units)1 ft.1 ft.Manufacturer and model Not known (spot melter).Acquired facility in 1995.Not known (spot melter).Acquired facility in 1995.Date of original installationNot known. Acquired facility in1995.Not known. Acquired facility in1995.Estimate of remaining lifetime (yrs) N/A. Continued maintenancecan maintain indefinite life.N/A. Continued maintenancecan maintain indefinite life.Major rebuilds:What constitutes a major rebuildFrequency of a major rebuildN/AN/ACost of typical major rebuildN/AN/ADate of last major rebuildN/AN/APurpose of last major rebuildN/AN/AIncrease or decrease in emissionsN/AN/AFuel type: electric, gas, or oilElectricElectricFuel consumption rate (KW/ton of glass or Btu/ton ofglass)List HAPs that are in refractory materialChromium CompoundsChromium CompoundsDesign production rate (tons/day)Actual glass pull rate (tons/day)FORM B-3PLANT OPERATIONSIII. Process - Glass Melting FurnaceFor each Glass Melting Furnace:Furnace 1Furnace 2Process unit identification name/numberNorth MelterSouth MelterProcess line(s) served (identification name/number) EL-1 EL-1Vent gas flow rate (acfm @°F)Temperature (°F) of molten glass in furnace andforehearth (if applicable)Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenanceproceduresGeneral maintenance activitiesfollow a prescribed schedulethat is detailed in themaintenance tracking system.Refractory repairs arecompleted infrequently andonly as necessary.General maintenance activitiesfollow a prescribed schedulethat is detailed in themaintenance tracking system.Refractory repairs arecompleted infrequently andonly as necessary.Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduceemissionsThe Company has establishedgoals to reduce theenvironmental footprint of ourmanufacturing operations aspart of our sustainabilityefforts. These goals arefocused on reducing waste-tolandfill, GHG, waterconsumption, VOC's,particulate matter, NOx andenergy.The Company has establishedgoals to reduce theenvironmental footprint of ourmanufacturing operations aspart of our sustainabilityefforts. These goals arefocused on reducing waste-tolandfill, GHG, waterconsumption, VOC's,particulate matter, NOx andenergy.Describe future source reduction plans and schedules None currently approved orscheduled at this time.None currently approved orscheduled at this time.FORM B-4PLANT OPERATIONSIV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame AttenuationFor each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame AttenuationForming Operation 1Process unit identification name/numberEL-1 FormingProcess line(s) served (identification name/number)EL-1Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)32.7623256Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)-111.5872569Stack or vent height (units)59.08 ft.Stack or vent diameter (units)4.50 ft.Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line.Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame).Indicate type of burner used (if flame).Air and FlameIs there a forehearth between the furnace andthe formingsection?YesMajor rebuilds:What constitutes a major rebuild The company undertakesroutine repair and replacementprojects. As with the furnace,these projects are normally “asis” maintenance projects that donot impact the formingemissions. Therefore, thecompany does not considerthese to be major rebuilds forthe purpose of this ICR.Frequency of a major rebuildN/ACost of typical major rebuildN/ADate of last major rebuildN/APurpose of last major rebuildN/AIncrease or decrease in emissionsN/AIf modular, number of modules and plenumsPresence of water overspray and application rate (gpm)Binder applied and application rate (gpm)Other material applied and application rate (gpm)NoneTemperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F)Temperature of binder when applied to fibers(°F)FORM B-4PLANT OPERATIONSIV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame AttenuationFor each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame AttenuationForming Operation 1Process unit identification name/numberEL-1 FormingProcess line(s) served (identification name/number)EL-1Method of evenly distributing fibers onto forming conveyor Compressed air lapping systemFormed mat thickness (in.)1"-6" as formed, up to 15" onramp.Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted None recirculated, 100%exhausted.Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenanceproceduresGeneral maintenance activitiesfollow a prescribed schedulethat is detailed in themaintenance tracking system.Repairs and replacements areperformed when required duringunscheduled downtimes.Basic, routine cleaning occursevery 6 to 12 weeks.Significant repairs such aschain and sprocketreplacement, frame repair andtrack replacement generallyoccur with refractoryreplacement of the furnace.FORM B-4PLANT OPERATIONSIV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame AttenuationFor each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame AttenuationForming Operation 1Process unit identification name/numberEL-1 FormingProcess line(s) served (identification name/number)EL-1Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduceemissionsDescribe future source reduction plans and schedules None currently approved orscheduled at this time.FORM B-5PLANT OPERATIONSV. Process - CuringFor eachCuring Oven:Curing Oven 1Process unit identification name/numberEL-1 CuringProcess line(s) served (identification name/number) EL-1Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 32.7623308 (stack 44) and32.7623356 (stack 45)Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -111.5870033 (stack 44) and -111.5868422 (stack 45)Stack or vent height (units)42.40 ft. (stack 44) and 44.40 ft.(stack 45)Stack or vent diameter (units)1.17 ft. (each)Method of curingManufacturer and modelGamma MechanicalDate of original installation1985Major rebuilds:What constitutes a major rebuild The company undertakesroutine repair and replacementprojects. As with the furnace,these projects are normally “asis” maintenance projects that donot impact the oven emissions.Therefore, the company doesnot consider these to be majorrebuilds for the purpose of thisICR.Frequency of a major rebuildN/ACost of typical major rebuildN/ADate of last major rebuildN/APurpose of last major rebuildN/AIncrease or decrease in emissionsN/AFuel type: electric, gas, or oilNatural GasFuel consumption rate (KW/hr or BTU/hr)Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat:inlet2 - 4%outlet<0.5%FORM B-5PLANT OPERATIONSV. Process - CuringFor eachCuring Oven:Curing Oven 1Process unit identification name/numberEL-1 CuringProcess line(s) served (identification name/number) EL-1Air flow rate (acfm @°F) from curingCharge: 5,600 acfm @ 220 °F.Discharge: 5,900 acfm @ 200°F.Exhaust air temperature (°F)200 - 220 °FResidence time of product (mins)Binder content of cured product (LOI)Nature and frequency of routine/preventivemaintenance proceduresGeneral maintenance activitiesfollow a prescribed schedulethat is detailed in themaintenance tracking system.Repairs and replacements areperformed when required duringunscheduled downtimes.Basic, routine cleaning occursevery 6 to 12 weeks.Significant repairs such aschain and sprocketreplacement, frame repair andtrack replacement generallyoccur with refractoryreplacement of the furnace.FORM B-5PLANT OPERATIONSV. Process - CuringFor eachCuring Oven:Curing Oven 1Process unit identification name/numberEL-1 CuringProcess line(s) served (identification name/number) EL-1Describe process modification(s) since 1999 thatreduce emissionsDescribe future source reduction plans andschedulesNone currently approved orscheduled at this time.FORM B-6PLANT OPERATIONSVI. Process - CoolingFor eachCooling Operation: Cooling Operation 1Process unit identification name/number EL-1 CoolingProcess line(s) served (identification name/number) EL-1Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)32.7622958Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)-111.5867836Stack or vent height (units)55.40 ft.Stack or vent diameter (units)1.17 ft.Cooling air flow rate (acfm @°F)4,000 acfm @ 155 °FPercentage of cooling air recirculated (if any) NoneCooling air temperature (°F)155°FNature and frequency of routine/preventivemaintenance proceduresGeneral maintenance activitiesfollow a prescribed schedulethat is detailed in themaintenance tracking system.Repairs and replacements areperformed when requiredduring unscheduleddowntimes. Basic, routinecleaning occurs every 6 to 12weeks. Significant repairssuch as chain and sprocketreplacement, frame repair andtrack replacement generallyoccur with refractoryreplacement of the furnace.FORM B-6PLANT OPERATIONSVI. Process - CoolingFor eachCooling Operation: Cooling Operation 1Process unit identification name/number EL-1 CoolingProcess line(s) served (identification name/number) EL-1Describe process modification(s) since 1999 thatreduce emissionsDescribe future source reduction plans and schedules None currently approved orscheduled at this time.FORM B-7PLANT OPERATIONSVII. Process - Use of SolventsUse of SolventsVolatile solvents used at your facility (where and how used) N/A. No HAP-containing solvents usedin themanufacturing process.List each solvent used and quantity (gal/yr) N/A. No HAP-containing solvents used in themanufacturing process.Emission control device(s) used to control emissions from solventusage/storage?N/A. No HAP-containing solvents used in themanufacturing process.FORM B-8PROCESS OPERATIONSVIII. Pollution PreventionPlease describe any work practices, pollution prevention techniques,and control strategies evaluated and/or implementedat each processunit at your facility (e.g., binder reformulation,alternative fuels usage,etc.) to reduce emissions of PM and HAPs you identified in Form E.You must specify the year in which the facility implemented thepractice/technique and identify the emission reductions (if measured)from these practices/techniques.FORM C-1AIR POLLUTION CONTROLNot applicable to this facility.I. Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)For each ESP:ESPProcess line(s) (identification name/number)N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/ALatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/ALongitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/AStack or vent height (units)N/AStack or vent diameter (units)N/AManufacturer and modelN/ADate of original installationN/ANumber of collection plates and configurationN/AGas flow rate to ESP (acfm @°F)N/AInlet gas temperature (°F)N/AOutlet gas temperature (°F)N/AInlet grain loading (gr/dscf)N/AOutlet grain loading (gr/dscf)N/AAverage stack opacity (%)N/APressure drop across ESP (in. H2O gauge) N/APlate area (ft2)N/AVendor guarantee on ESP efficency (attach copy)N/AMethod of plate cleaning and frequencyN/AFlow rate of plate washwater to ESP (gpm), ifapplicableN/ATemperature of plate washwater to ESP (°F), if applicableN/ASource of plate washwater used for cleaning,if applicableN/AConcentration (mg/l) of dissolved and suspended solids in platewashwater, if applicableN/AConditioning agents used and amounts (in gpmor lbs/hr), ifapplicableN/AAmount of wastewater generated (gpd), if applicableN/AAmount of wastewater recycled (gpd), if applicableN/AAmount of wastewater disposed of (gpd), if applicableN/AMethod of wastewater disposal, if applicalbeN/AQuantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr)N/AQuantitiy of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr)N/AQuantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr)N/AFORM C-1AIR POLLUTION CONTROLNot applicable to this facility.I. Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)For each ESP:ESPProcess line(s) (identification name/number)N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/AMethod of solid waste disposalN/ANature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenanceproceduresN/AProblems experienced with control device within the last fiveyears; how were problems solved?N/AContinuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor ESPperformance, including parameters monitoredN/ADescribe any plans to replace or upgrade ESPN/AFORM C-2AIR POLLUTION CONTROLII. ScrubberFor each Scrubber:Scrubber 1Process line(s) (identification name/number) EL-1Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)EL-1 FormingLatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)32.7623256Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)-111.5872569Stack or vent height (units)59.08 ft.Stack or vent diameter (units)4.50 ft.Manufacturer and modelDucon VVODate of original installation1985Type (e.g., venturi, orifice)CyclonicGas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @°F)41,000 acfm @ 100 °FInlet gas temperature (°F)No data available.Outlet gas temperature (°F)100 °FInlet grain loading (gr/dscf)No data available.Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf)0.0283 gr/dscfAverage stack opacity (%)<40%Water flow rate to scrubber (gpm) 101.7 - 207gpmPercent of scrubber water from recycled wastewater 100%Source of scrubbing water and type of pretreatment. Substance(s)added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpmor lbs/hr)Reclaimed wash waterHAP composition of wastewater (mg/L) 100 mg/LConcentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids inscrubbing water1.5% by weightScrubbing water temperature (°F)75 °FLiquid/gas ratio (gal/103acfm)5.05 gal/103acfmPressure drop across scrubber (in. H2O gauge) 2.31" - 4.68"Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) 0 gpdAmount of wastewater recycled (gpd) 100%Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) 0 gpdFORM C-2AIR POLLUTION CONTROLII. ScrubberFor each Scrubber:Scrubber 1Process line(s) (identification name/number) EL-1Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)EL-1 FormingMethod of wastewater disposalN/AQuantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr) Nodata available.Quantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr) 0 lbs/yrQuantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr) No data available.Method of solid waste disposalN/AVendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy) Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures General maintenanceactivities follow aprescribed schedule that isdetailed in themaintenance trackingsystem. Nozzles and flowpatterns are checked daily;repairs are completed asneeded. Cleaning isperformed on a cyclematching machinedowntime.Problems experienced with control device within the last five years;how were problems solved?Facility is not a Title Vfacility and not subject torecordkeepingrequirements of controldevice problems.Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubberperformance, including parameters monitoredN/APlans to replace or upgrade scrubber None currently approvedor scheduled at this time.FORM C-3AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIII. Mechanical CollectorNot applicable to thisfacility.For each Mechanical Collector:Mechanical CollectorProcess line(s) (identification name/number) N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/ALatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/ALongitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/AStack or vent height (units)N/AStack or vent diameter (units)N/AManufacturer and modelN/ADate of original installationN/AType of mechanical collectorN/AGas flow rate to collector (acfm @°F)N/AInlet gas temperature (°F)N/AOutlet gas temperature (°F)N/AInlet grain loading (gr/dscf)N/AOutlet grain loading (gr/dscf)N/AAverage stack opacity (%)N/AOverall pressure drop (in. H2O gauge) N/AVendor guarantee on mechanical collector efficiency (attachcopy)N/AQuantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr) N/AQuantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr) N/AQuantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr) N/AMethod of solid waste disposal N/ANature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures N/AProblems experienced with control device within the last fiveyears; how were problems solved?N/AContinuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance,including parameters monitoredN/APlans to replace or upgrade mechanical collector N/AFORM C-4AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIV. Fabric FilterFor each Fabric Filter:Fabric Filter 1 Fabric Filter 2 Fabric Filter 3Process line(s) (identification name/number) EL-1 EL-1 EL-1Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#1EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#2EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#3Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)32.762444432.762428332.7623922Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)-111.5873108-111.5873533-111.5873511Stack or vent height (units)58.75 ft.58.75 ft.58.75 ft.Stack or vent diameter (units)0.50 ft.0.50 ft.0.50 ft.Manufacturer and model MikroPul 25-S8-30TR MikroPul 25-S8-30TR MikroPul 25-S8-30TRDate of original installation 1999 1999 1999Number of compartments 1 1 1Number of bags per compartment 25 25 25Filter material and coatings applied HCE Polyester HCE Polyester HCE PolyesterFabric weight (oz/yd2) 16 oz/yd216 oz/yd216 oz/yd2Filter surface area (ft2) 9.43 ft29.43 ft29.43 ft2Gas flow rate to filter (acfm @°F)400 acfm @ ambient 400 acfm @ ambient 400 acfm @ ambientInlet gas temperature (°F)90 °F 90 °F 90 °FOutlet gas temperature (°F)90 °F 90 °F 90 °FInlet grain loading (gr/dscf) No data available. No data available. No data available.Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) <0.007 gr/dscf <0.007 gr/dscf <0.007 gr/dscfAverage stack opacity (%) <40% <40% <40%Overall pressure drop (in. H2O gauge) 4.0" 4.0" 4.0"Method and frequency of bag cleaning Reverse jet for 10 seconds. Reverse jet for 10 seconds. Reverse jet for 10 seconds.Vendor guarantee on fabric filter efficiency(attachcopy)Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Quantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr) N/A(Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)FORM C-4AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIV. Fabric FilterFor each Fabric Filter:Fabric Filter 1 Fabric Filter 2 Fabric Filter 3Process line(s) (identification name/number) EL-1 EL-1 EL-1Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#1EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#2EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#3Quantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr) N/A(Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)Quantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr) 0lbs 0 lbs 0 lbsMethod of solid waste disposal N/A N/A N/ANature and frequency of preventive maintenanceproceduresGeneral maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.General maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.General maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.Problems experienced with control device within thelast five years; how were problems solved?Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitorperformance, including parameters monitoredN/A N/A N/APlans to replace or upgrade fabric filter Nonecurrently approved orscheduled at this time.None currently approved orscheduled at this time.None currently approved orscheduled at this time.FORM C-4AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIV. Fabric FilterFor each Fabric Filter:Process line(s) (identification name/number)Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)Stack or vent height (units)Stack or vent diameter (units)Manufacturer and modelDate of original installationNumber of compartmentsNumber of bags per compartmentFilter material and coatings appliedFabric weight (oz/yd2)Filter surface area (ft2)Gas flow rate to filter (acfm @°F)Inlet gas temperature (°F)Outlet gas temperature (°F)Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf)Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf)Average stack opacity (%)Overall pressure drop (in. H2O gauge)Method and frequency of bag cleaningVendor guarantee on fabric filter efficiency(attachcopy)Quantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr)Fabric Filter 4 Fabric Filter 5 Fabric Filter 6EL-1 EL-1 EL-1EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#4EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#5EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#632.762393632.762386732.7624381-111.5873003-111.5872642-111.587259458.75 ft.58.75 ft.58.75 ft.0.50 ft.0.50 ft.0.50 ft.MikroPul 25-S8-30TR MikroPul 25-S8-30TR MikroPul 25-S8-30TR1999 1999 19991 1 125 25 25HCE Polyester HCE Polyester HCE Polyester16 oz/yd216 oz/yd216 oz/yd29.43 ft29.43 ft29.43 ft2400 acfm @ ambient 400 acfm @ ambient 400 acfm @ ambient90 °F 90 °F 90 °F90 °F 90 °F 90 °FNo data available. No data available. No data available.<0.007 gr/dscf <0.007 gr/dscf <0.007 gr/dscf<40% <40% <40%4.0" 4.0" 4.0"Reverse jet for 10 seconds. Reverse jet for 10 seconds. Reverse jet for 10 seconds.Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)FORM C-4AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIV. Fabric FilterFor each Fabric Filter:Process line(s) (identification name/number)Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)Quantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr)Quantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr)Method of solid waste disposalNature and frequency of preventive maintenanceproceduresProblems experienced with control device within thelast five years; how were problems solved?Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitorperformance, including parameters monitoredPlans to replace or upgrade fabric filterFabric Filter 4 Fabric Filter 5 Fabric Filter 6EL-1 EL-1 EL-1EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#4EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#5EL-1 Batch Raw Material Silo#6N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)0 lbs 0 lbs 0 lbsN/A N/A N/AGeneral maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.General maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.General maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.N/A N/A N/ANone currently approved orscheduled at this time.None currently approved orscheduled at this time.None currently approved orscheduled at this time.FORM C-4AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIV. Fabric FilterFor each Fabric Filter:Process line(s) (identification name/number)Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)Stack or vent height (units)Stack or vent diameter (units)Manufacturer and modelDate of original installationNumber of compartmentsNumber of bags per compartmentFilter material and coatings appliedFabric weight (oz/yd2)Filter surface area (ft2)Gas flow rate to filter (acfm @°F)Inlet gas temperature (°F)Outlet gas temperature (°F)Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf)Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf)Average stack opacity (%)Overall pressure drop (in. H2O gauge)Method and frequency of bag cleaningVendor guarantee on fabric filter efficiency(attachcopy)Quantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr)Fabric Filter 7 Fabric Filter 8EL-1 EL-1EL-1 Furnace (North DustCollector)EL-1 Furnace (South DustCollector)32.7623332.7623575-111.5872364-111.587235836.0 ft.36.0 ft.1.0 ft.1.0 ft.MikroPul 144S6-20-TR MikroPul 144S6-20-TR2005 20051 1144 144Aramid Aramid16 oz/yd216 oz/yd27 ft27 ft25,400 acfm 5,400 acfm350 °F 350 °F300 °F 300 °FNo data available. No data available.<0.007 gr/dscf <0.007 gr/dscf<40% <40%4.0" 4.0"Reverse jet. Varies based ondifferential pressure.Reverse jet. Varies based ondifferential pressure.Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.Not available. Acquiredfacility in 1995.N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)FORM C-4AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIV. Fabric FilterFor each Fabric Filter:Process line(s) (identification name/number)Equipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)Quantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr)Quantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr)Method of solid waste disposalNature and frequency of preventive maintenanceproceduresProblems experienced with control device within thelast five years; how were problems solved?Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitorperformance, including parameters monitoredPlans to replace or upgrade fabric filterFabric Filter 7 Fabric Filter 8EL-1 EL-1EL-1 Furnace (North DustCollector)EL-1 Furnace (South DustCollector)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)N/A (Closed system returnscollected dust to process.)0 lbs 0 lbsN/A N/AGeneral maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.General maintenance repairsas needed. Visualinspections and differentialpressure checks areperformed routinely. Bag orcartridge replacement isperformed as needed.Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.Facility is not a Title V facilityand not subject torecordkeeping requirementsof control device problems.N/A N/ANone currently approved orscheduled at this time.None currently approved orscheduled at this time.FORM C-5AIR POLLUTION CONTROLV. Thermal IncineratorNot applicable to this facility.For each Thermal Incinerator: Thermal IncineratorProcess line(s) (identification name/number) N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/ALatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/ALongitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/AStack or vent height (units)N/AStack or vent diameter (units)N/AManufacturer and model N/ADate of original installation N/AFuel type: gas or oil N/AFuel consumption rate (BTU/hr) N/AInlet gas flow rate (acfm @°F)N/AInlet gas temperature (°F)N/ACombustion chamber gas temperature (°F)N/AOutlet gas temperature (°F)N/AInlet grain loading (gr/dscf) N/AOutlet grain loading (gr/dscf) N/AAverage stack opacity (%) N/AExcess air (%)N/AResidence time (sec) at temperature (°F)N/APercent heat recovery N/AVendor guarantee on incinerator efficiency (attachcopy)N/ANature and frequency of preventive maintenanceproceduresN/AFORM C-5AIR POLLUTION CONTROLV. Thermal IncineratorNot applicable to this facility.For each Thermal Incinerator: Thermal IncineratorProcess line(s) (identification name/number) N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/AProblems experienced with control device within thelast five years; how were problems solved?N/AContinuous monitoring method(s) used to monitorincinerator performance, including parameters monitoredN/APlans to replace or upgrade thermal incinerator N/AFORM C-6AIR POLLUTION CONTROLNot applicable to this facility.VI. High Velocity Air Filter (HVAF)For each HVAF:HVAFProcess line(s) (identification name/number) N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/ALatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/ALongitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/AStack or vent height (units)N/AStack or vent diameter (units)N/AManufacturer and model N/ADate of original installation N/AInlet gas flow rate (acfm @°F)N/AInlet gas temperature (°F)N/AOutlet gas temperature (°F)N/AInlet grain loading (gr/dscf) N/AOutlet grain loading (gr/dscf) N/AAverage stack opacity (%) N/AWater spray pressure (sdig), if applicable N/AWater spray rate (gpm), if applicable N/AFilter face velocity (acfm/ft2)N/AMaximum pressure drop across mat (in. H2O gauge) N/AVendor guarantee on HVAF efficiency (attach copy) N/AMethod and frequency of filter mad advancement N/AAmount of wastewater generated (gpd) N/AAmount of wastewater recycled (gpd) N/AAmount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) N/AMethod of wastewater disposal N/AQuantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr) N/AFORM C-6AIR POLLUTION CONTROLNot applicable to this facility.VI. High Velocity Air Filter (HVAF)For each HVAF:HVAFProcess line(s) (identification name/number) N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emissionpoint designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/AQuantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr) N/AQuantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr) N/AMethod of solid waste disposal N/ANature and frequency of preventive maintenanceproceduresN/AProblems experienced with control device within thelast five years; how were problems solved?N/AContinuous monitoring method(s) used to monitorHVAF performance, including parameters monitoredN/APlans to replace or upgrade HVAF N/AFORM C-7AIR POLLUTION CONTROLVII. Mist EliminatorNot applicable to this facility.For each Mist Eliminator:Mist EliminatorProcess line(s) (identification name/number) N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 plot plan)N/ALatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/ALongitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/AStack or vent height (units)N/AStack or vent diameter (units)N/AManufacturer and modelN/ADate of original installationN/AType of mist eliminatorN/AGas flow rate to mist eliminator (acfm @°F)N/AInlet gas temperature (°F)N/AOutlet gas temperature (°F)N/AInlet grain loading (gr/dscf)N/AOutlet grain loading (gr/dscf)N/AAverage stack opacity (%)N/AVelocity in mist eliminator (ft/sec) N/APressure drop (in. H2O gauge) N/AFor chevron blade mist eliminators:N/ASpacing between blades (in.) N/AWashing frequency of blades N/AFor mesh pad mist eliminators:N/ANumber of pads or elements N/AThickness of pad (in.) or element dimensions N/ADensity of pad, (lb/ft3)N/AWashing frequency of padN/AVendor guarantee on mist eliminator efficiency (attach copy) N/AAmount of wastewater generated (gpd) N/AFORM C-7AIR POLLUTION CONTROLVII. Mist EliminatorNot applicable to this facility.For each Mist Eliminator:Mist EliminatorAmount of wastewater recycled (gpd) N/AAmount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) N/AMethod of wastewater disposal N/AQuantity of solid waste collected (lbs/yr) N/AQuantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/yr) N/AQuantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/yr) N/AMethod of solid waste disposal N/ANature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures N/AProblems experienced with control device within the last fiveyears; how were problems solved?N/AContinuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor mist eliminatorperformance, including parameters monitoredN/APlans to replace or upgrade mist eliminator N/AFORM C-8AIR POLLUTION CONTROLVIII. Ventilation SystemFor each Ventilation System:Ventilation System 1Process line(s) (identification name/number)Furnace HallEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)Fugitive / Furnace VentsLatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 32.7623769 (nort vent)and 32.7623111 (southvent)Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -111.5871547 (northvent) and -111.5871544(south vent)Stack or vent height (units)53.50 ft.Stack or vent diameter (units)11.25 ft.For general or building ventilation:Ventilation system usedNatural draft with walland roof louvers.Airflow control system usedManual, adjusted.Number of air changes per hour Estimatedat 4-6 airchanges per hour.For unit or local ventilation:Enclosure or hood design usedN/AVolume of enclosure or hoodN/ACapture velocity (ft/sec)N/ADistance between hood and emission source (ft)N/AFORM C-9AIR POLLUTION CONTROLIX. OtherNot applicable to this facility.For each Other Air Pollution Control Device (APCD): Other APCDProcess line(s) (identification name/number) N/AEquipment/process(es) controlled. Include emission pointdesignations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan)N/ALatitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/ALongitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)N/AStack or vent height (units)N/AStack or vent diameter (units)N/ADescriptionN/AFORM DPROCESS LINE STARTUP AND SHUTDOWNN/A - Facility is not subject to MACT Subpart NNN or other recordkeepingrequirements that provide a method of accurate determination of start-upsand shutdowns.1. For each startup and shutdown (SS) that occurred during the lastfive years, please provide the following information requested in A.through J.A. Using the definitions provided above, indicate whether theevent was a startup or shutdown;N/AB. A description of the event, including identification of theemissions source or sources associated with the startup orshutdown;N/AC. Whether any permit condition was exceededand, if so, whatpermit condition was exceeded;No.D. Whether the event was covered by any contingency plan forcontrolling emissions during startup and shutdown events and, if so,whether the plan was followed; if the plan was notfollowed, why not;No.E. The duration of the event;N/AF. The actions taken to minimize emissions during the event,including the use of any backup control systems;N/AG. Estimates or measurements, if any, of emissions during theevent; if you did not have the ability to quantifyemissions during theevent, please explain why;N/AH. Whether the emission profile of each unitwas different duringstartup and shutdown than during normal operating conditions and, ifso, how emissions were different and why; please provide anysupporting information;No.I. All performance test data collected during each period of SS;the test method used for each event; when the testing wasconducted and why; the test conditions at the timeof testing; andwhether the tests were associated with a routine startup or shutdown;andN/AStartup: the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.Shutdown: the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.FORM DPROCESS LINE STARTUP AND SHUTDOWNN/A - Facility is not subject to MACT Subpart NNN or other recordkeepingrequirements that provide a method of accurate determination of start-upsand shutdowns.J. All monitoring data, including control system parametermonitoring, collected during each period of SS.N/AIf this information is contained in periodic and immediate SS reports(either stand-alone or contained within the periodic excess emissionsreport) submitted to your permitting authority, youmay submit copiesof those reports instead.2. Are there any types of startup or shutdown events that you havebeen able to eliminate? If so, please describe thetype of event andexplain how these events were eliminated.No.3. Please submit a copy of your SS plan if you arerequired todevelop one.N/A4. Please provide all performance test data collected during periodsof SS over the last 5 years. Indicate the test method used for eachevent.N/A5. Please provide all monitoring data, including control systemparameter monitoring, collected during periods of SS over the last 5years.N/A6. Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standardthat would applyduring startup or shutdown? If so, please describethe event to whichthe standard would apply; the recommended standard(this could bean emission limitation, work practice, or operational standard) thatwould apply during the period; the basis for the recommendedstandard; why and how the standard would minimize emissionsduring the event; and how would compliance be determined and/ormonitored.No.FORM EPRESENCE OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN EMISSION POINTSPlease provide any existing emissions information and data coveringhazardous air pollutants (HAP) and particulate matter (PM) for each listedprocess. Identify the appropriate box for which you are providing specificprocess information and/or pollutant emissions data.Melting Furnace Forming Curing CoolingParticulate Matter (PM, PM 2.5, PM Condensable)Chromium Compounds and Hexavalent Chromium (including any Crspeciation data)Other metal HAP (As, Be, Cd, Co, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se)Hydrogen Fluoride (HF)Hydrogen Chloride (HCl)FormaldehydePhenolMethanolOther organic HAPThe existing data requested here has been providedto EPA by the industry’s trade association, the NorthAmerican Insulation Manufacturers Association (“NAIMA”). The existing data provided by NAIMA was setforth inNAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA. The existing emissions data provided from fiber glass companies includedtest results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, hydrogen fluoride,metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel and selenium),mercury and hexavalent chromium. The existing emissions data provided from mineral wool companies includedtest results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbonmonoxide,carbonyl sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,lead,manganese, nickel and selenium), mercury and hexavalent chromium.The scope of the existing data provided was the result of consensus reached by EPA, NAIMA and industryrepresentatives. In addition to the existing datasubmitted to EPA, extensive new emissions data is being collectedfrom virtually all companies through the “BTEC, Inc. Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Mineral Wool and WoolFiberglass Emissions Test Program.” This Test Program will collect and submit to EPA, through EPA’s ElectronicReporting Tool, representative emissions data for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol,particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbonyl sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium,cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickeland selenium), mercury and hexavalent chromium.FORM F-1COSTI. Process Unit (e.g., cupola, curing oven, etc.):For each Process Unit:Process Unit IDProcess Line IDII. Capital CostsBase yearTotal capital cost, including costs for individual pieces, if available.III. Annual Operating CostsBase year (most recent fiscal year)Total annual operating costsMaintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item)Raw materials costsLabor($/yr) for each labor class(hr/hr) for each labor classUtilities (breakdown for each utility)Waste treatment and/or disposalCosts associated with any work practices and pollution preventiontechniques that are employed at your facilitySavings associated with heat recovery and wastewater and/or solid wastereturned to process from APCD (or sold to another user)Indirect costsOther (specify)Please provide the annual report to shareholders orequivalent for the mostrecent fiscal year. If reports are not available,provide annual sales andprofits (or profit margin) for the most recent fiscal year. If company ispublicly owned, please provide a web link to this information.Identify the market range (regional, national, international) of your products.The company objects to this request because it seeks information that is notrelevant to the EPA Administrator's review obligations pursuant to Clean AirAct Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2).FORM F-1COSTThe company objects to this request because it seeks information that is notrelevant to the EPA Administrator's review obligations pursuant to Clean AirAct Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2).Can your product(s) be substituted by another product(s)? If so, please listyour product(s) and substituted product(s).Wool fiberglass insulation comprises the major market forresidential insulation material used in the UnitedStates.The remaining market consists of cellulose (scrapnewspaper) treated to resist fires, spray foam, foamboards, cotton treated to resist fires, and wool treated toresist fires.Wool fiberglass insulation is preferred over thesealternative insulation materials because it is easily,economically, and safety installed in various buildingsettings, has superior fire performance capabilities, and a70-year history of proven performance and durability.FORM F-2COSTI. Air Pollution Control Device (APCD)For each APCD:APCD IDProcess Unit IDII. Capital CostsBase yearAPCD equipment purchase cost and what was includedList the cost for each piece of auxiliary equipment for each APCD notincluded aboveInstallation costLand purchase costTotal capital costMethod of financining APCDRetrofit installationField erected or modularIII. Annual Operating CostsBase year (most recent fiscal year)Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item)Raw materials costsLabor($/yr) for each labor class(hr/hr) for each labor classUtilites (breackdown for each utility)Waste treatment and/or disposalIndirect costsOther (specify)The company objects to this request because it seeks information that is notrelevant to the EPA Administrator's review obligations pursuant to Clean AirAct Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2).FORM F-2Total annual operating cost (most recent fiscal year)Attach annual report to shareholders or equivalentfor the most recent fiscalyear. Alternatively, if company is publicly owned,you can provide yourcompany's web link to this information.