alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Impact of DoD Acquisition Policies and Practices on the Health and Competitiveness of U.S. Defense Companies will meet in closed session on February 22, 2000; March 7, 2000; and tentatively on March 21-22, 2000; April 5-7, 2000; and April 20-21, 2000. All meetings will be held at TRW Inc., 1001 19th Street North, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22209.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition. Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Task Force will review the Department of Defense's acquisition policies and regulations governing the primary vendors of military equipment; determine whether these acquisition policies, processes and regulations have supported or weakened rational and economical business practices within the primary vendors of military equipment; and assess the impact of those policies, practices and regulations on the health and competitiveness of U.S. defense companies. The Task Force plans to hold sensitive programmatic discussions with the primary vendors during the course of this effort.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c) (1) and (4) (1994), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: February 4, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-3070  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
      of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





3.
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      May
      18, 2007


By:
            /s/
              David LiebermanDAVID
                LIEBERMANChief
                Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1347 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                               H. R. 1347

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 1993

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
          To modify the boundary of Hot Springs National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the boundary of 
Hot Springs National Park is modified as depicted on the map entitled 
``Proposed Boundary Map'', numbered 128/80015, and dated August 5, 
1985.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Summary Sheet of Executive Cash Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 SUMMARY SHEET OF EXECUTIVE CASH COMPENSATION 
  
 On March 31, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of Leggett & Platt,
Incorporated reviewed executive officer compensation and approved base salary increases for the following Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) effective April 3, 2005. The Committee made no changes to incentive, equity, or other
components of NEO compensation. This information is intended to update executive compensation amounts provided in Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 28, 2005, and has previously been disclosed under Item 1.01 of Form 8-K
filed April 5, 2005. Robert A. Jefferies, Jr. retired from the Company May 4, 2005 and therefore is not included in the below table. 
  

											
	 Executive    

	  	Previous
Base Salary

	  	New
Base Salary

	 	 	% Increase

	 
	 Felix E. Wright
 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	816,000	  	$	842,520	1	 	3.25 	%
	 David S. Haffner
 President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	652,800	  	$	716,140	2	 	9.70 	%
	 Karl G. Glassman
 Executive Vice President and President – Residential Furnishings
	  	$	489,600	  	$	572,915	2	 	17.02 	%
	 Jack D. Crusa
 Senior Vice President – Specialized Products
	  	$	250,000	  	$	260,000	 	 	4.00 	%



	1	Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Wright’s annual percentage increase must be at least equal to the percentage increases over the previous year
(to the extent not attributable to additional responsibilities) of the aggregate salaries of the five highest-paid executives other than himself. Mr. Wright waived this right. 

  

	2	Increases for David Haffner and Karl Glassman reflect further completion of planned management transition. 

  

 25
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent to rule on application.

# SUMMARY:

This correction revises information from the previously published notice.

                        In notice document 00-29918 appearing in the issue of Wednesday, November 22, 2000, under                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        , in the first column, in the fifteenth line, the date the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later than should read “March 15, 2001”.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-2307, 601-664-9885.

Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on November 24, 2000.

Patrick Vaught,

Acting Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 00-30774  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
exv10w1



 










Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Changes being made to Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan for Employees of

Trinity Industries, Inc. and Certain Affiliates




The Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Trinity Industries, Inc. and Certain Affiliates will be restated in 2005 to add a company-paid Annual Retirement
Contribution (“ARC”) and a company-paid Start-Up Contribution. The ARC will be available to all eligible employees regardless of whether or not a
participant makes salary deferrals. The amount of the ARC will be based on years of service as of December 31st of each year and will vest over 5 years.
The Start-Up Contribution is only available to Company employees who elected to freeze their pension plan benefit and participate in the enhanced 401(k)
plan. The Start Up contribution is based on years of service, with a minimum of $500 and a maximum of $1,000.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1009 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H.R. 1009

   To terminate the obligation of funds by the United States for the 
                superconducting super collider project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 1993

 Mr. Slattery (for himself, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Glickman, Mr. Penny, Mr. 
   Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Vento, Mr. Johnston of 
Florida, Mrs. Collins of Illinois, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Shays, Mr. LaFalce, 
  Mr. Evans, Mr. Stark, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Poshard, Mr. 
Porter, Mr. Andrews, of Maine, Mr. Kanjorski, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Reed, 
  Mr. Dooley, Mr. Payne of New Jersey, Mr. Herger, and Mr. Johnson of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To terminate the obligation of funds by the United States for the 
                superconducting super collider project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the United States 
shall not, after the date of enactment of this Act, obligate any funds 
for the superconducting super collider project.

                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 392

Designating September 5, 1994, Labor Day, as ‘‘Try American Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 22, 1994

Mr. COX (for himself, Mr. TRAFICANT, and Mr. GOODLING) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post

Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating September 5, 1994, Labor Day, as ‘‘Try

American Day’’.

Whereas the creativity and ingenuity of American working

men and women in the United States have provided a

host of new products and services which improve the

quality of life in the United States and the world;

Whereas American workers should be recognized as one of

our Nation’s most valuable resources;

Whereas the American spirit of entrepreneurship, pride of

craftsmanship, and commitment to quality are hallmarks

recognized throughout the world;
2

•HJ 392 IH

Whereas the United States and its citizens have reason to

celebrate the strength and quality of American products

and services;

Whereas the quality and abundance of American goods are

a tribute to the productivity and ability of American

workers;

Whereas the ability of American companies to export, even in

the face of strong trade barriers in many countries, is a

sign of the true competitiveness of American products;

Whereas American farmers and ranchers provide this country

and the world with a wide array of high quality food and

fiber products and consistently create annual agricultural

trade surpluses of more than $20,000,000,000;

Whereas the energy and perseverance of American business

serves as a beacon for other nations that strive to ensure

prosperity for their people; and

Whereas American small business provides a basis for economic progress and for the creation of jobs and opportunities for people from every corner of America: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 5, 1994, Labor Day, is designated as

4 ‘‘Try American Day’’, and the President is authorized and

5 requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe the day with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities and to honor the day through

8 the purchase of American-made goods and services.

Æ
### Appeal No. 2020AP2115

- CR Cir. Ct. No. 2015CF1118



### STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT III

S TATE OF 

### W ISCONSIN



### ,

P LAINTIFF



### - R ESPONDENT



### ,

V



### .

J EFFREY 

### K YLE 

### W ALKER



### ,

D EFENDANT



### - A PPELLANT



### . 

### FILED

July 13, 2023

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals



### ERRATA SHEET

Samuel A. Christensen

Clerk of Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District I

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District III

Electronic Notice

Christina Plum

, Sarah Motiff

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District II

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District IV

Electronic Notice Hon. Timothy A. Hinkfuss

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

John VanderLeest

Clerk of Circuit Court

Brown County Courthouse

Electronic Notice

Sonya Bice

Electronic Notice

David L. Lasee

Electronic Notice

Jeffrey Kyle Walker 460158

Oshkosh Correctional Inst.

P.O. Box 3310

Oshkosh, WI 54903

- 3310



### PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to paragraph 38

in the above

- captioned opinion which was released on May 23, 2023 . A corrected2



### electronic version in its entirety is available on the court's website at

www.wicourts.gov.3
exv10w44



 






EXHIBIT 10.44




TERMINATION AGREEMENT




     This Termination Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 31st
day of March, 2005 (“Effective Date”), by and between AESP, Inc., f/k/a Advanced Electronic Support
Products, Inc. (“AESP”), a Florida corporation, and Roman Briskin (“Briskin”).



     WHEREAS, AESP and Briskin are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated February 19,
1997 (“Employment Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, AESP and Briskin have agreed that the Employment Agreement shall be terminated
effective as of the Effective Date; and



     WHEREAS, notwithstanding the termination of the Employment Agreement, Briskin shall continue
as an at-will employee of AESP following the Effective Date.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto agree as follows:




	6.  	The Employment Agreement is hereby terminated, effective as of the Effective Date. As of such
date, the parties hereby release each other from any and all obligations under the Employment
Agreement.
	 
	7.  	Notwithstanding the termination of the Employment Agreement pursuant to this Agreement,
following the Effective Date Briskin shall continue to serve as an at-will employee of AESP.
In that regard, and subject to such future determinations with respect to Briskin’s
compensation as may be made by the Board of Directors of AESP, Briskin shall continue to earn
his current annual base salary of $198,000 per annum, shall continue to receive an automobile
allowance of $500 per month and shall continue to participate in the benefit plans of the
Company in which he currently participates. Further, notwithstanding the termination of the
Employment Agreement, Briskin shall continue to hold the Company stock options that he
currently holds, all in accordance with the terms of the agreements with respect to such
options.
	 
	8.  	Notwithstanding the termination of the Employment Agreement pursuant to this Agreement,
following the Effective Date, AESP shall continue to indemnify Briskin with respect to his
actions as an officer and director of AESP to the fullest extent provided by law, as more
particularly set forth in AESP’s articles of incorporation and by-laws.
	 
	9.  	This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties in respect of its subject
matter and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings (oral or written) between or
among the parties with respect to such subject matter.
	 
	10.  	The rights and obligations of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the
parties and their respective successors and assigns.




 









 











     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above
written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Roman Briskin	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Roman Briskin	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AESP, INC., a Florida corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	BY:
	 	/s/ John F. Wilkens	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name (print): John F. Wilkens

Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### Mrs. Mattie FARR, Appellant, v. M. A. STANOSCHEK, Appellee.

No. 12904.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

Oct. 5, 1940.

Bird & Bird, Joe C. Luther, and D. D.. Bird, all of Dallas, for appellant.

Alexander D. McNabb, of Dallas, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the court below reformed,, in keeping with the jury verdict, and as. reformed, affirmed. The rule applied in Kelley v. Ward, 94 Tex. 289, 60 S.W. 311, is in point.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.12


FISCAL 2016 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
For the twelve month period ending June 30, 2016, each non-employee director of Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. will receive the following compensation: 
 
	
				
	 ●
	 
	 
	Retainers of $40,000 for service as a board member; $20,000 for service as a chairman of a board committee; $10,000 for service as a member of a board committee; and $1,200 per board or committee meeting attended in the event that more than twelve of such meetings are held during the period. Directors may irrevocably elect, in advance of each fiscal year, to receive these fees in cash, in common stock of the Company or a combination thereof, or in restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Each director electing to receive fees in RSUs shall at the time of such election also irrevocably select the date of settlement of the RSU. On the settlement date, RSUs may be settled, at the Company’s discretion, in cash or in shares of common stock or a combination thereof.




 
	
				
	 ●
	 
	 
	An RSU award with a value of $125,000 payable, in the Company’s discretion, in cash or in shares of common stock. The Company will provide for the RSU payment, whether paid in cash or shares of common stock, to be made (in a lump sum if paid in cash) within 30 days following the six-month anniversary of the termination of the director’s board membership. 




In addition, the Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual retainer of $60,000, and may irrevocably elect, in advance of each fiscal year, to receive this retainer in cash, in common stock of the Company or a combination thereof, or in RSUs. The non-employee members of the Board are also reimbursed for travel, lodging and other reasonable expenses incurred in attending board or committee meetings.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00646-CR

Jimmy Rodgers WHARTON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A14443

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 7, 2016.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### Carolyn Pica, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Carl Pica, Deceased, Respondent, v Good Samaritan Hospital et al., Appellants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering resulting from medical malpractice, the defendants Dix Hills Medical Associates, P. C., Bernard Gittleman, Martin D. Podgainy, Jacques M. Schmid, and Meta Bernstein appeal, and the defendant Good Samaritan Hospital separately appeals, from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered August 25, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied their motion and cross motion, respectively, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on condition that the plaintiffs attorney personally pay $2,000 to Martin, Clearwater & Bell, the attorneys for the defendants Dix Hills Medical Associates, P. C., Bernard Gittleman, Martin D. Podgainy, Jacques M. Schmid and Meta Bernstein, and $1,000 to Bower and Gardner, the attorneys for the defendant Good Samaritan Hospital, within 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this order with notice of entry; and it is further,

Ordered that if the condition is not complied with, then the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the motion and cross motion to dismiss the complaint are granted.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 was not an appropriate sanction in this case. However, although the plaintiffs attorney did suffer from a debilitating illness for an extended period of time, his undue delay of the discovery process occurred prior to the onset of the illness and warrants the imposition of a financial sanction against him *(see, e.g., River Park Assocs. v Meyerbank Elec. Co.,*116 AD2d 709; *Mancusi v Middlesex Ins. Co.,*102 AD2d 846). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the  "Partnership") for the period ended June 30,
2008 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002,   I,  Melanie  R.  Wenk,
Vice-President  and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Melanie R. Wenk
------------------
Melanie R. Wenk
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 24, 2009