alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 75 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 75

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 9 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``National Good Teen Day''.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed January 16, 1992, as 
        ``Good Teen Day'';
Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in the United States 
        according to the 1990 Census;
Whereas our Nation's teenagers represent an important part of our society, and 
        the many physical and emotional changes and character-building 
        experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;
Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who have problems or 
        those who excel;
Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their intelligence, 
        abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the good which is inherent 
        in all human beings;
Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to esteem the good as 
        well as the potential that is within each of them;
Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive qualities in America's 
        youth; and
Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That January 16, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Good Teen Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers 
of the United States and by participating in appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           ACTIVE VOICE CORPORATION
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                   Name Under Which 
                                                                                 Subsidiary is Doing
      Name of Subsidiary                         Jurisdiction                         Business
      ------------------                         ------------                 ----------------------
<S>                                      <C>                                              <C>
Active Voice International Corp.         St. Thomas, US. Virgin Island                    N/A
Active Voice Canada Ltd.                 Ontario, Canada                                  N/A
Pronexus, Inc.                           Ontario, Canada                                  N/A
Active Voice B.V.                        Maarssenbroek, The Netherlands                   N/A
Active Voice (UK) Limited                England                                          N/A
Active Voice Australia Pty Ltd.          Victoria, Australia                              N/A
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

FELIX S. ROBERTS, §

TDCJ No. 2017141, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-2225-K

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, 

the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge.

The Court therefore TRANSFERS Petitioner’s unauthorized successive 28 

U.S.C. 2254 habeas application to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth 

Circuit for appropriate action.

And, because the Court is transferring the application to the Fifth Circuit, a 

certificate of appealability (a COA) is not necessary. See United States v. Fulton, 780 

F.3d 683, 688 (5th Cir. 2015) (“[A] transfer order under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 is not a 

final order within the meaning of § 2253(c)(1)(B), and the appeal of such an order 

Case 3:22-cv-02225-K-BN Document 5 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 20
2

does not require a COA.”); Guel-Rivas v. Stephens, 599 F. App’x 175, 175 (5th Cir. 

2015) (per curiam) (applying Fulton’s holding to transfer of a successive Section 2254 

application).

SO ORDERED.

Signed October 25th, 2022.

____________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02225-K-BN Document 5 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 21
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 12146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04715]

[[Page 12146]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Tomahawk Live Trap, LLC of Hazelhurst, Wisconsin, an exclusive license 
to U.S. Patent No. 8,407,931, ``TRAPPING METHOD AND APPARATUS'', issued 
on April 2, 2013.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Tomahawk Live Trap, LLC of 
Hazelhurst, Wisconsin has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-04715 Filed 3-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 Scipio Africanus and the Second Punic War: Joint lessons for Center of Gravity Analysis Joint and Combined Warfighting School, Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University
 JFSC students in Joint and Combined Warfighting School, National Defense University published, "Scipio Africanus and the Second Punic War: Joint lessons for Center of Gravity Analysis" during attendance at JPME-II.  Published in JFQ 88, 10 Jan 2018
 SHARE
 PRINT
  Center of Gravity Indirect Approach Operational Approach Rome and Carthage
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
 Chief Executive Officers Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
          (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: May 22, 2008
    /s/ Michael K. PaulkMichael K. PaulkPresident
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., CELLTRION, 

INC., SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD.,

Appellees

______________________

2024-1564, 2024-1567

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022-

01225, IPR2022-01226, IPR2023-00532, IPR2023-00533, 

and IPR2023-00566.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, 

Inc.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the abovecaptioned appeals pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42,

Case: 24-1564 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 08/20/2024
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. MYLAN 

PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

2

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted, and the appeals are dismissed.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs for each appeal.

August 20, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 20, 2024

 

Case: 24-1564 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 08/20/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1125 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1125

 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
 Liability Act of 1980 to require a preference for interim measures in 
  carrying out response actions, consistent with protection of public 
                 health, welfare, and the environment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1993

Mr. Santorum (for himself, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Doolittle, 
 and Mr. Zimmer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
       the Committee on Energy and Commerce and Public Works and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
 Liability Act of 1980 to require a preference for interim measures in 
  carrying out response actions, consistent with protection of public 
                 health, welfare, and the environment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREFERENCE FOR INTERIM MEASURES IN SUPERFUND RESPONSE 
              ACTIONS.

    Section 121(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9621(a)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding any other 
provision of this Act, in selecting appropriate remedial actions, the 
President shall give a preference to the use of institutional controls 
(such as deed and access restrictions, monitoring, and provision of 
alternate water supplies), containment methods (including caps, slurry 
walls, and surface water diversion), and other interim measures, rather 
than permanent treatment technologies, if such interim measures are 
sufficient to protect the public health, welfare, and the 
environment.''.

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    (a) Report Requirement.--The President shall submit to Congress a 
report, during each of the 5 years listed in subsection (b), on the use 
of interim measures under section 121 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 
U.S.C. 9621), as required by the amendment made by section 1. The 
report shall cover the preceding fiscal year and shall include the 
estimated savings resulting from the use of such interim measures in 
comparison to using permanent treatment technologies.
    (b) Deadline.--The President shall submit the report required by 
subsection (a) by October 1 of 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.

                                 <all>
```
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 6

Designating April 9, 1993, and April 9, 1994, as ‘‘National Former Prisoner

of War Recognition Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. APPLEGATE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating April 9, 1993, and April 9, 1994, as ‘‘National

Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day’’.

Whereas the United States has fought in many wars;

Whereas thousands of members of the armed forces of the

United States who served in such wars were captured by

the enemy and held as prisoners of war;

Whereas many such prisoners of war were subjected to brutal

and inhumane treatment by their captors in violation of

international codes and customs for the treatment of

prisoners of war and died, or were disabled, as a result

of such treatment; and

Whereas the great sacrifices of such prisoners of war and

their families deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HJ 6 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That April 9, 1993, and April 9, 1994, is designated as

4 ‘‘National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day’’ in

5 honor of the members of the armed forces of the United

6 States who have been held as prisoners of war, and the

7 President is authorized and requested to issue a proclama8 tion calling upon the people of the United States to com9 memorate such day with appropriate ceremonies and ac10 tivities.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Donald J. Trump, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/    DONALD J. TRUMP                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|Donald J. Trump Chief Executive Officer
of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc.



November 14, 2003
#### DAVIS v. MENDLOWITZ et al.

No. 12443.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Oct. 22, 1952.

J. F. Park, Robt. A. Sone, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Harold Alberts, Corpus Christi, for ap-pellees.

. W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

. This suit was instituted by H. D. Davis against David S. Mendlowitz and wife, Kay Mendlowitz, and Fred W. dander, seeking to recover 'for personal injuries alleged to have been' sustained by him when he fell from a scaffold, on November 15, 1950, while working upon a dwelling being erected at 221 Airline Road in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. The building was ■being erected as a home by the Mend-lowitzes.

The Mendlowitzes answered and, among other things, alleged that they had let a contract to Fred W. dander, tq construct their home; that he was an! independent contractor and that Davis was not their em*997ployee but the employee of Olander. The Mendlowitzes filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted, and a summary judgment was entered to the effect that H. D. Davis recover nothing from the Mendlowitzes; from which judgment H. D. Davis has prosecuted this appeal.

We "are of the opinion that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in this case. The motion for summary judgment, together with the 'supporting affidavit, when considered in the light of the affidavits of Davis and Olander, fails to show that there was no genuine issue of fact raised in this case. It is true that appellees had a written contract with Olander which showed on' its face that Olander was an independent contractor, however, appellant stated in his affidavit that this contract was abandoned and that Olander was nothing more than a foreman'. Olander’s affidavit was to the same effect:

 Appellant was not a party to this contract and it was in no way binding upon him. The burden was upon appellees tó prove that Olander was an' independent contractor. Thus a question of fact was raised as to the existence of the contract at the time appellant was injured.

Furthmore, appellant stated in his affidavit that regardless of the contract the appellees assumed absolute control of the building of their home and directed the details of its construction, and that he was injured as a result of the negligence of appellees. This again raises a question of fact. Even though the appellees entered into the contract with Olander in good faith and intended that he should be an independent contractor, if they in fact disregarded the contract and took full charge of the details of the construction and directed the mode and manner in which' the work, should be carried on, and if the appellant was injured as a result of the negligence of appellees, the existence of the written contract would be immaterial.

It is only where there is no genuine issue of fact that a summary judgment should be rendered. Haley v. Nickels, Tex. Civ.App., 235 S.W.2d 683; King v. Rubin-sky, Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W.2d 220; De la Garza v.- Ryals, Tex.Civ.App., 239 S.W.2d 854; Sarnoff v. Ciaglia, 3 cir., 165 F.2d 167.

Accordingly, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BWAY
CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1998             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998             MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                           2,469                   2,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,996                  44,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                       658                     658
<INVENTORY>                                     52,962                  52,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,348                 108,348
<PP&E>                                         159,588                 159,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,075                  30,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,877                 330,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,305                  71,305
<BONDS>                                        152,057                 152,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               99                      99
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,392                  82,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,877                 330,877
<SALES>                                        101,165                 193,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,165                 193,279
<CGS>                                           83,819                 160,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,388                 182,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   148                      86
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (50)                     78
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,493                   6,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,777                  10,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,831                   4,357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,946                   6,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                  (1,161)
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,946                   4,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42                     .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40                     .49
        

</TABLE>