alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 149 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 149

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the provision 
that permits payments from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund for 
          the expenses of presidential nominating conventions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
       the Committees on Ways and Means and House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the provision 
that permits payments from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund for 
          the expenses of presidential nominating conventions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF SECTION 9008 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986.

    Chapter 95 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking out section 9008.

SEC. 2. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.

    The table of sections for chapter 95 of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking out the item relating to section 9008.

                                 <all>
```
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 291

Designating March 20 through March 26, 1994, as ‘‘Small Family Farm

Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 10, 1993

Mrs. CLAYTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating March 20 through March 26, 1994, as ‘‘Small

Family Farm Week’’.

Whereas the small family farmer contributes enormously to

the agricultural productivity of the United States of

America;

Whereas the plight of the small family farmer has been in

jeopardy in recent times;

Whereas many small family farms continue to operate in the

face of financial and credit difficulties;

Whereas the size and crop makeup of family farms varies

from region to region in the United States of America;
2

•HJ 291 IH

Whereas a small family farm can generally be defined as having gross sales of under $40,000, using family members

as the primary component of labor; and

Whereas the small family farm represents the historical foundation of American agriculture: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of March 20 through March 26, 1994, is

4 designated as ‘‘Small Family Farm Week’’, and the Presi5 dent is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation

6 calling on the people of the United States to observe the

7 week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Stevenson, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(1)         TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  James E. Stevenson, Jr. |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| James E.  Stevenson, Jr.          |
| Chief  Financial Officer          |
|                              |
| May 15, 2003                      |

 

----
Converted by FileMerlin








Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is made as of the 20th day of April, 2005. 

BETWEEN:

R. MICHAEL STUNDEN of 404-2490 W. 2nd Ave., Vancouver, BC V6K 1J6 

(the "Lender")

AND:

PROJECT ROMANIA INC., of 404-2490 W. 2nd Ave., Vancouver, BC V6K 1J6 




(the "Borrower")

WHEREAS the Lender is a principal shareholder of the Borrower; 

AND WHEREAS the parties entered into a loan agreement dated November 1, 2003 (the “Original Loan Agreement”) respecting money advanced and loaned by the Company by the Lender;

AND WHEREAS the parties wish to amend the Original Loan Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto each to the other), the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1

AMENDMENT

1.1

The Original Loan Agreement is amended by 

(a)

deleting the words “May 1, 2005” in Section 2.02 of the Original Loan Agreement and replacing them with “May 1, 2007;” and 

(b)

deleting Section 2.03 of the Original Loan Agreement in its entirety. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

PROJECT ROMANIA INC.



by its authorized signatory






/s/ R. Michael Stunden








/s/ R. Michael Stunden




R. MICHAEL STUNDEN
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Administrative subpoena.
    OMB No.: 0970-0152.
    Description: P.L. 104-193, the Personal Responsibility and Work 
Opportunity Act of 1996 amended section 652(a) of the Social Security 
Act (the Act) to require the Federal Office of Child Support 
Enforcement (OCSE) to promulgate an administrative subpoena to be used 
by the State Child Support Enforcement (CSE) programs in interstate 
cases. (See attachment #1) The OMB approval of the form is expiring and 
we are taking this opportunity to make minor revisions to the form to 
further assist States in gaining access to the assets of child support 
obligors.
    Respondents: States.

                                             Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of     Average  burden
                 Instrument                      Number of      responses  per     hours  per      Total burden
                                                respondents       respondent        response          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Subpoena.....................          24,695                1              0.5           12,347
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 12,347.

    Additional Information:
    Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to The 
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Information 
Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20447, Attn: 
ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after November 30, 
2000. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if 
OMB receives it before January 2, 2001. Written comments and 
recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent 
directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork 
Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: 
Desk Officer for ACF.

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
Bob Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30496 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 415 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 415

 Designating the week beginning October 16, 1994, as ``National Penny 
                            Charity Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 1994

Mr. Porter (for himself, Mr. Clay and Mr. Myers of Indiana) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the week beginning October 16, 1994, as ``National Penny 
                            Charity Week''.

Whereas 170 billion pennies--$1.7 billion--are circulating in the economy;
Whereas financial institutions, merchants, and retail establishments are 
        reporting a shortage of pennies;
Whereas this shortage is a result of American people hoarding their pennies;
Whereas, during fiscal year 1994, the United States Mint will spend $1.64 
        million to produce 13.3 billion pennies in order to counter the effect 
        of hoarding;
Whereas donating hoarded pennies to charities provides the charities with funds, 
        diminishes the shortage of pennies, lowers the demand on the United 
        States Mint to produce additional pennies, and ultimately saves the 
        United States Treasury money;
Whereas Penny Lover's of America is a not-for-profit charitable organization 
        that seeks to promote character, scholarship, and patriotism among 
        America's youth by collecting penny donations to finance their 
        educational pursuits;
Whereas Penny Lover's of America is celebrating its 10th anniversary this year 
        by conducting a penny recycling campaign; and
Whereas ``National Penny Charity Week'' coincides with Penny Lover's of 
        America's ``National Penny Campaign Recycling Project'' both of which 
        will assist in alleviating the penny shortage and raise funds for 
        charitable and community causes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
designating the week of October 16, 1994, as ``National Penny Charity 
Week'' and to call on the people of the United States to observe such 
week with appropriate ceremonies and activities, including the donation 
of pennies to charities, particularly to those which provide direct 
services to the Nation's underprivileged and disadvantaged population, 
and to worthy community causes.
                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT FOUR TO INSURANCE PROCESSING AGREEMENT


This document is Amendment Four to the Insurance  Processing  Agreement made and
entered into effective June 1, 1993 (the  "Agreement"),  by and between American
National Insurance Company ("American National") a Texas corporation, and Legacy
Marketing Group ("LMG"), a California corporation.

In  consideration  of mutual covenants  contained  herein,  the parties agree as
follows:

3.   Section 6.1 of the  Agreement  is hereby  deleted in its  entirety  and the
     following new Section 6.1 shall be substituted therefor:

     "6.1 Subject to termination as hereinafter  provided,  this Agreement shall
     remain in force and effect  until the close of business on March 31,  1999,
     the initial term of this Agreement. This Agreement may be renewed by mutual
     agreement for additional successive terms of one (1) year unless terminated
     by either party by prior  written  notice to the other at least one hundred
     eighty  (180)  days  prior to the end of the  initial  term or the  renewal
     term."

4.   Except as  specifically  amended  hereby,  all terms and  provisions of the
     Insurance Processing Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


LEGACY MARKETING GROUP                   AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE
                                         COMPANY


By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts                 By: /s/ James E. Pozzi
    ------------------------------           ------------------------------

Title: PRESIDENT                         Title: EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
       ---------------------------              ---------------------------

Witness: /s/ Stephanie Molteni           Witness: /s/ Sherry Zimmerman
         -------------------------                -------------------------

Date: 12/18/98                           Date: 12/22/98
      ----------------------------             ----------------------------
#### W. A. HANNA v. STATE.

No. 20707.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1940.

J. V. Patterson, of Decatur, and Fred Minor, of Denton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted for the offense of converting funds belonging to Wise County alleged to be in his possession, and was given a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

For the reasons stated in Hanna v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 135 S.W.2d 105, this case is reversed and remanded.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 112 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to expand the boundary of the 

Homestead National Monument of America, in the State of Nebraska, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to expand the 

boundary of the Homestead National Monument of 

America, in the State of Nebraska, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homestead National 

5 Monument of America Boundary Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

8 acquire by donation or by purchase with donated or approVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:58 Jan 10, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H112.IH H112

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 112 IH

1 priated funds, from willing sellers only, the lands or inter2 ests in lands as described in subsection (b), as generally 

3 depicted on the map titled ‘‘Homestead National Monu4 ment of America Boundary’’, numbered 368/80,039, and 

5 dated April 2007. 

6 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The lands referred to in 

7 subsection (a) are— 

8 (1) the approximately 140 acres located south 

9 of the Homestead National Monument and owned by 

10 the Friends of Homestead; and 

11 (2) the approximately 160 acres known as the 

12 ‘‘Graff Parcel’’. 

13 (c) BOUNDARY REVISION.—The Secretary shall re14 vise the boundary of the Homestead National Monument 

15 to reflect the acquisition upon its completion. 

16 (d) ADMINISTRATION OF ACQUIRED LANDS.—Any 

17 lands acquired under this section shall be administered by 

18 the Secretary as part of the Homestead National Monu19 ment in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-412-K (01)

§

TREVON HAYES §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry 

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation 

Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto 

having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), 

the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by 

the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and the Defendant is hereby 

adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Signed March 4th, 2023.

_____________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00412-K Document 25 Filed 03/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 44
#### LEWIS v. STATE.

No. 20134.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

K. W. Denman, E. J. Conn, and J. J. Collins, all of Lufkin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for keeping a gambling house; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The prosecution is based upon Article 625, P. C., which denounces as a felony the keeping of “any premises, building, room or place for the purpose of being used as a place to bet or wager, or to gamble with cards, dice, or dominoes,” etc.

To sustain a conviction under the terms of the article mentioned, it must be shown that the accused had some interest in the premises, building, room or place, in which the games were played. See Francis v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 67, 233 S.W. 974; Parshall v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 177, 138 S.W. 759; also 20 Tex.Jur. p. 657, sec. 43.

Briefly summarized, the evidence adduced by the State is to the effect that a group of negroes were engaged in a “crap game” in a building known as “Frank Jones’ Place” in the negro section of the city of Lufkin, Texas. They were discovered by a constable who watched the game for a few minutes and then arrested all of the parties present with the exception of one negro who escaped. At the time of his arrest the appellant was sitting at a table on which the dice were being thrown. He had in his possession a little box called “Kittie” in which was kept money collected from the participants in the game.

Appellant testified upon the trial and admitted that he was taking part in the “crap game” but claimed that he was not conducting a gambling house; that he did not have charge or control of the property; nor did he have any interest therein. He also testified that just before the arrival of the constable one Will Boykins requested him to take care of the little box or “Kittie” until he returned; that while doing so the appellant was arrested by the constable. According to the appellant, Boykins had evidently seen the officer coming and therefore managed to leave the building before the arrest was made.

*122The State’s Attorney before this court' concedes that the proof fails to show that .the appellant had any interest in the building as owner, lessee, tenant, or otherwise, in which the game was being played. From .our examination of the evidence we are inclined to concur in this view.

The judgment is reversed -and the cause remanded.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

Re:   Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
      2005-2007 Performance Cycle

Dear ____:

Congratulations! You have been recommended by our Chief Executive Officer, and
approved by the Management Development/Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors ("the Committee"), to participate in the Allied Waste Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP) for the 2005-2007 performance cycle.

Enclosed are the following materials that describe the program:

     -   LTIP Highlights

     -   The LTIP Summary Plan Description

     -   The LTIP Plan Document

In short, the LTIP provides you with an opportunity to earn an incentive based
on the attainment of predetermined objectives over a 3-year performance cycle.
It is conceptually similar to the annual bonus plan, but with a longer
performance period. With continued Committee support, we anticipate starting a
new cycle each year.

The LTIP is an effective complement to our stock-based long-term incentive
plans. We now have more flexibility to combine LTIP and stock-based incentives
to create customized total compensation packages that best meet your needs and
the needs of the Company.

YOUR TARGET AWARD AND PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Your target award and your performance objectives for the 2005-2007 cycle are
described in the enclosed Schedule. Any earned awards will be paid in early
2008.

                                    * * * * *

Please feel free to contact me directly at (480) 627-_____ if you have any
questions.

Sincerely,

_______________
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 of the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark A Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 9, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    Mark A. Smith   
|                      |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Mark A. Smith          
|                      |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 27, 2014 

# Order

June 27, 2014

149411 ( 43 )

MELISSA RENEE POAG

- EMERY

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

MATTHEW JOHN EMERY

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. SC: 149411

COA: 318401

Kent CC: 08

- 001251

- DM

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for temporary admission under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED and the following out

- of

- state attorneys are admitted for the purpose of appearing on behalf of a micus curiae A Better Balance, T he Alliance: State Advocates for Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, Carr Center for Reproductive Justice at New York University School of Law, Deborah M. Fisch, J.D., National Advocates for Pregnant Women, National Organiza tion for Women Foundation, and National Organization for Women Michigan in th is case: Sarah E. Burns and Avram D. Frey

.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0971

_____________________________

GERNARD CHESTNUT,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

August 10, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as 

unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Gernard Chestnut, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.