alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ronco Corporation
(the "Company") for the period from October 15, 2004 (Date of Inception) to June
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard F. Allen, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                            /s/ Richard F. Allen, Sr.
                           -------------------------
                           Richard F. Allen, Sr.

November  , 2005

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U. S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - 21 CFR Part 73 
          - [Docket No. 97C-0415] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 8, 2000 (65 FR 48375). This document amended the color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of luminescent zinc sulfide as a color additive in certain externally applied cosmetics. In amending the color additive regulations, the document inadvertently omitted a phrase from the codified. This document corrects that error.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 This rule is effective December 1, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Aydin Oearstan, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3076. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 00-19952, appearing on page 48377 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 8, 2000, the following correction is made:                 

§ 73.2995 

                        1. On page 48377, in the second column, in § 73.2995                         *Luminescent zinc sulfide*, in paragraph (c), beginning in the fifth line, the phrase “(included under § 720.4(c)(7)(ix) and (c)(8)(v) of this chapter) subject” is corrected to read “and nail polish included under § 720.4(c)(7)(ix) and (c)(8)(v) of this chapter, respectively,”.                     

Dated: November 21, 2000. 

L. Robert Lake, 

Director of Regulations and Policy, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 

[FR Doc. 00-30580 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

p0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137962

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137962 COA: 288426 Kent CC: 07-009061-FC HAYWARD EUGENE WELCH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 21, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-411-000]

Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), tendered for filing the Agreement for Interconnection Service (Agreement), between SCE and Harbor Cogeneration Company (Harbor).

The Agreement specifies the terms and conditions under which SCE will interconnect Harbor's 80,000 kW generating facility with SCE's Harborgen Substation pursuant to SCE's Transmission Owner Tariff.

Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and all interested parties.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or November 30, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30357  Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Scott, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.), rendered March 9, 1989, convicting him of sodomy in the second degree and sexual abuse in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress a statement made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was tried and convicted of performing oral sex on, and sexually abusing, a 13-year-old boy. The defendant presented his own version of the facts at trial, and contends that the complainant should not have been believed. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, who saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY2d 84, 94; *see also, People v Almonte,*135 AD2d 824). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

*524The defendant contends that a written confession was involuntarily obtained from him by the police, and that the hearing court did not set forth on the record findings of fact and conclusions of law in denying suppression of the statement. Even though a hearing court fails to make findings of fact as required by CPL 710.60 (6), the failure to do so does not require reversal where the record of the hearing is sufficient for this court to make such findings *(see, People v Le Grand,*96 AD2d 891). The record discloses that the hearing court properly admitted the written confession into evidence, since under the totality of the circumstances, it was not involuntarily obtained. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TANDY BRANDS
ACCESSORIES, INC.'S JUNE 30, 1998, ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FILINGS.  DOLLARS ARE IN
THOUSANDS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,116
<INVENTORY>                                     48,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,180
<PP&E>                                          16,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,846
<BONDS>                                         35,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,617
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,020
<SALES>                                        135,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,041
<CGS>                                           86,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,424
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,237
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-18357, 333-46084, 333-67331,
333-89377, and 333-91518) pertaining to the Cygnus, Inc. Amended 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Cygnus, Inc. Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, in the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-39275, 333-49020, 333-60598, 333-60962, 333-71524, 333-85801, and
333-91949) and in the related prospectuses of our report dated February 24, 2003 (except for Note 10, as to which the date is March 19, 2003), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Cygnus, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



Palo
Alto, California
March 26, 2003

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANGELO DIVISION

ROBERT SCHELSKE, et a1.,

Plaintiffs,

No. 6:22-CV-049-H

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official

capacity as United States Secretary of

Defense, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

In accordance with the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, on

January 10,2023, the Secretary of Defense issued a memorandum rescinding the vaccine

mandate across military branches.r The memorandum provides that "[n]o individuals

curently serving in the Armed Forces shall be separated solely on the basis of their refusal

to receive the COVID-19 vaccination if they sought an accommodation on

religious . . . grounds." Id. at 7. Ir further states that "[t]he Military Departments will

update the records ofsuch individuals to remove any adverse actions solely associated with

denials of such requests, inciuding letters ofreprlmand." Id

In light of this development, it is ordered that the parties shal1 submit a supplemental

starus report by no later than January 18, 2023, describing what, if any, issues remain to be

litigated and proposing, ifnecessary, a schedule to do so.

r Sec'y of Def., Rescission of August 24,2021 and November 30,2021 Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination

Reqiirementsfor Members ofthe Armed Forces, https: / / media,defense.gov /2023/Jan/10/2003143118

/ -i / -I / I / SECRETARY.OF-DEFENSE-MEMO-ON-RESCISSION.OF.CORONAVIRUS.

DlSEASE-201 9-VACCINATION.REQUIREMENTS.FOR-MEMBERS.OF-THE-ARMEDFORCES.PDF (Jan. 10, 2023).

Case 6:22-cv-00049-H Document 86 Filed 01/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2025
Further, the defendants shall file a response to the plaintiffs' complaint by no later

than January 20,2023. Any response filed by January 20,2023, shall be deemed timely.

So ordered on lunuury ll ,2023.

&),

WESLEYHENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Case 6:22-cv-00049-H Document 86 Filed 01/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2026
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1136 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1136

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
    construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1993

 Mr. Smith of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
    construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the request 
of the licensee for FERC Project No. 7829 (and after reasonable 
notice), is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of such section 13 and the 
Commission's procedures under such section, to extend the time required 
for commencement of construction of such project for up to a maximum of 
2 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall take effect for such 
project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the Commission 
under such section 13) of the period required for commencement of 
construction of such project.

                                 <all>
```
#### MILLER et al. v. TEXAS GENERAL AGENCY CO.

No. 10715.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 27, 1940.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1940.

Coleman Gay, of Austin, for plaintiffs in error.

R. H. Mercer and House & Irvin, all of San Antonio, for defendant in error.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

 This is purely a fact case, tried to the court without a jury. The trial judge filed no written findings of fact, nor conclusions of law, and none was requested. In such case it will be presumed that the trial court found every fact necessary to sustain the judgment, and such facts will be given effect in determining the appeal, if supported by any evidence. We cannot say upon the record that there was *no*evidence to support the presumed findings, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.
Case 4:22-cv-00932-P Document 1 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00932-P Document 1 Filed 10/18/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00932-P Document 1 Filed 10/18/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00932-P Document 1 Filed 10/18/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00932-P Document 1 Filed 10/18/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00932-P Document 1 Filed 10/18/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00932-P Document 1 Filed 10/18/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 7
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
Mark J. Huber, Chief Financial Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350) that:

(1)       
          The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2009, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
          The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp,
          Inc.

|Date:  November 16, 2009 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By /s/ Mark J. Huber      
      Mark J. HuberIts:  Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Friday, April 12, 2013 Meeting April 12, 2013
Office of Justice Programs
Third floor Main Conference Room
810 7th Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
Time: 10:00 AM to 11:45 AM

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance

**National Task Force on Children Exposed to Violence's Defending Childhood Report**

The report, commissioned by the Attorney General as part of the Defending Childhood Initiative, was informed in part by public hearings conducted nationwide.
	Read the executive summary or full report.April 12, 2013 Meeting Materials

**U.S. Department of Health and Human Services**

HHS Tentative Priorities Report for Defending Childhood
	HHS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Bulletin
	HHS Announcements**Bios/Press Release/PowerPoint**

Press Release: Robert Listenbee Assumes Leadership of OJJDP
	Robert L. Listenbee Bio
	Kathi Grasso Bio
	Kathi Grasso PowerPoint Slide**U.S. Department of Agriculture**

USDA How to Get Food Help Brochure
	USDA Rural Programs Tips for Success
	USDA Summer Food Rocks - Sites Finder
	USDA Summer Food Service Program - Outreach Toolkit**Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

OJJDP New Releases Flier**Office of National Drug Control Policy**

ONDCP Drug Free Communities Handout**Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration**

SAMHSA Handout - The Courage to Remember Childhood Trauma**The National Child Traumatic Stress Network**

NCTSN Final Brochure
	NCTSN Centers Map
	NCTSN Community Violence Handout
	NCTSN Domestic Violence & Children
	NCTSN Knowledge Bank Handout
	NCTSN Resource List by Audience
	NCTSN Support Materials
  
Date Published: April 12, 2013
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
#### BAILEY v. STATE.

No. 21194.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

A. A. Kern, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.