alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert L. Listenbee, Jr.
Administrator

Robert L. Listenbee, Jr. is the Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention. He was appointed to the position by President!
Barack Obama in February 2013. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Listenbee
was Chief of the Juvenile Unit of the Defender Association of Philadelphia
for 16 years and a trial lawyer with the association for 27 years. As a
member of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Committee of
the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, he advised
Pennsylvania's governor on juvenile justice policy. Mr. Listenbee served as
chair of the Defender Policy Group of the National Legal Aid & Defender
Association and on policy committees of the National Center for Juvenile Justice.

Mr. Listenbee also served on the advisory board of the National Juvenile Defender Center and was
actively involved in the MacArthur Foundation's Models for Change initiative in Pennsylvania. He served
as president of the Juvenile Defenders Association of Pennsylvania and was a member of the Juvenile
Indigent Defense Action Network, which works to improve access to counsel and the quality of
representation for Pennsylvania's children.

Mr. Listenbee co-chaired Attorney General Eric Holder's National Task Force on Children Exposed to
Violence and served as a member of OJJDP's Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice, which
advises the President, Congress, and the OJJDP Administrator on juvenile justice policy.

Mr. Listenbee received his B.A. degree from Harvard University and his J.D. from the Boalt Hall School of
Law at the University of California, Berkeley.
Exhibit 32.03
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Operating Officer and principal financial officer
of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World
Resource Trust (the "Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Trust
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.


/s/ Gregg Buckbinder
 -------------------------
 Gregg Buckbinder
 Chief Operating Officer
 August 12, 2004
#### UNITED CAB CO., Appellant, v. Roy J. DAVENPORT, Appellee.

No. 10843.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 8, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1941.

Randle Taylor, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Walter Groce, of San Antonio, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion on authority of Associated Indemnity Corporation v. J. M. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 29, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00975-CV 

TRAVIS LEWIS, Appellant 

V. 

ERIN DUNN AND JEFF IRBY, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07728 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Whitehill, and Molberg 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Appellant’s brief is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry 

regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s 

record and appellant’s brief to be filed by March 13, 2020. By postcard dated March 

19, 2020, we notified appellant the time for filing appellant’s brief had expired. We 

directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We 

cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result 

in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an 

extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of 

this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 

190975F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TRAVIS LEWIS, Appellant 

No. 05-19-00975-CV V. 

ERIN DUNN AND JEFF IRBY, 

Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07728. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Whitehill and Molberg 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellees ERIN DUNN AND JEFF IRBY recover their 

costs of this appeal from appellant TRAVIS LEWIS. 

Judgment entered April 29, 2020.
#### BRIGGS v. STATE.

No. 21936.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1942.

E. L. Hartwell, of Greenville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $100 in the County Court of Hunt County on a charge of possessing intoxicating liquor in a container without tax stamp being attached.

There are no bills of exception in the record and the procedure appears to be regular. The evidence is sufficient upon which the jury was authorized to return the verdict.

There being nothing for our consideration, the judgment of the trial court is af-firméd.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29898]



[[Page 70374]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice Number 3465]


Notice of Meetings; United States International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee (ITAC)--Telecommunication Standardization Sector 
(ITAC-T); U.S. Study Groups A and B

    The Department of State announces meetings of the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC)--
Telecommunication Standardization (ITAC-T) National Committee and US 
Study Groups A and D. The purpose of the Committees is to advise the 
Department on policy and technical issues with respect to the 
International Telecommunication Union and international 
telecommunication standardization and development. Except where noted, 
meetings will be held at the Department of State, 2201 ``C'' Street, 
NW, Washington, DC.
    The ITAC-T U.S. Study Group A will meet from 9:30 to noon on 
November 29, 2000, at the Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554 to prepare positions for the ITU-T 
Study Group 3 meeting starting in December.
    The ITAC-T U.S. Study Group B will meet from 9:30 AM to 3:30 on 
December 19, 2000, at the Department of Commerce, Room B841A, 1401 
Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20230 to prepare positions for the 
next ITU-T Study Group 4 meeting.
    Members of the general public may attend these meetings. Directions 
to meeting locations and actual room assignments may be determined by 
calling the Secretariat at 202 647-0965/2592. For meetings held at the 
Department of State: entrance to the building is controlled; people 
intending to attend any of the ITAC meetings should send a fax to (202) 
647-7407 not later than 24 hours before the meeting for preclearance. 
This fax should display the name of the meeting (ITAC T, U.S. Study 
Group A or D) and date of meeting, your name, social security number, 
date of birth, and organizational affiliation. One of the following 
valid photo identifications will be required for admission: U.S. 
driver's license, passport, U.S. Government identification card. Enter 
the Department of State from the C Street Lobby; in view of escorting 
requirements, non-Government attendees should plan to arrive not less 
than 15 minutes before the meeting begins.
    Attendees may join in the discussions, subject to the instructions 
of the Chair. Admission of members will be limited to seating 
available.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
Marian Gordon,
Chairman, ITAC T, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-29898 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-U
#### In the Matter of Peter G. Grossman, Respondent, v Willis S. Hilker, Appellant.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Rose, J.), entered March 16, 1990 in Tompkins County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Town Law § 91, to declare invalid a petition for a permissive referendum on a resolution of the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca approving the construction of a bicycle recreation way.

It is not disputed that respondent failed to comply with the 30-day time limitation set forth in Town Law § 91 for filing a referendum petition. Even if we accept his contention that Supreme Court could have excused such failure, the court *776nevertheless properly ruled that no credible evidence was offered which was legally sufficient to extend the time limitation or which demonstrated dilatory or obstructive behavior by certain public officials as respondent claimed. Respondent’s remaining contentions with respect to certain rulings by the court at the hearing have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1387 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1387

  To correct the tariff classification of timing apparatus with opto-
                        electronic display only.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1993

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To correct the tariff classification of timing apparatus with opto-
                        electronic display only.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That chapter 91 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting 
after subheading 9106.90.40 the following new subheading with the 
article description having the same degree of indentation as the 
article description for subheading 9106.90.40:

      

       ``  9106.90.60     Battery or AC powered with opto-electronic                         35%                
                           display only...................................  3.9% + 5.3% on                    ''
                                                                             the battery                       .

    Sec. 2. (a) The amendment made by the first section of this Act 
applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the fifteenth day after the date of this Act.
    (b) Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon a 
request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the ninetieth 
day after the date of enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal 
from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amendment made by 
the first section of this Act applies and that was made--
            (1) on or after January 1, 1993; and
            (2) before the fifteenth day after the date of enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been a lower duty if the 
amendment made by the first section had applied to such entry or 
withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
withdrawal had occurred on such fifteenth day.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     941,789
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         941,789
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,776,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,990,921
<PP&E>                                         145,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                 127,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,924,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,167,920
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,780,198
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,924,483
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,041,066
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,738,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               18,460
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             258,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            25,125
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   25,127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01
        


</TABLE>
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|U.S. Refinery Finished Conventional Gasoline Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|U.S. Refinery Finished Conventional Gasoline Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 115,218 | 69,875 | NA     | 62,135 | NA     | 64,009
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 60,176 | 59,019 | 58,574 | 57,392 | 56,077  | 56,681 | 55,136 | 57,717 | 56,340 | 52,590
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 51,301 | --     | --     | --     | --      | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

TINITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

MEGAN TATE GANDY,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE TINITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,]ILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been flled within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bX1), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedDecemb", L ,ZOZ2.

JAMES SLEY RIX

UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NO. 5:22-CR-074-05-H

Case 5:22-cr-00074-H-BQ Document 164 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 314
#### Charles Ostrowski et al., Respondents, v Dominick P. Massa, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff, Charles Ostrowski, seeks damages for personal injuries that he allegedly sustained when a portion of the concrete back porch collapsed at premises that he rented from defendant. Testimony at an examination before trial revealed that, approximately one year prior to the accident, defendant performed work, using a jackhammer, on concrete steps immediately adjacent to the porch. Plaintiff contends that this repair work, under the circumstances, weakened the stability of the porch. Defendant failed to tender evidence in admissible form demonstrating that the use of the jackhammer did not affect the structural integrity of the porch. Defendant, therefore, has failed to establish his defense "sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in [his] favor” (CPLR 3212 [b]; *see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). In view of our determination, we do not address defendant’s remaining contentions. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Ontario *965County, Harvey, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                   FIRST AMENDMENT
                                          TO
                               ACTIVE VOICE CORPORATION
                          1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


    THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is adopted effective as of July 1, 1997 (the
"Amendment Date"), by ACTIVE VOICE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation (the
"Company").

                                       RECITALS

    A.   The Company has adopted the Active Voice Corporation 1996 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan").

    B.   The Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.

    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

    1.   Clause (b) of Article 3 of the Plan is amended by replacing "20 hours"
with "10 hours".

    2.   Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed as of the
Amendment Date.

                                  ACTIVE VOICE CORPORATION



                              By          /s/ Robert L. Richmond
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Robert L. Richmond, Chief Executive Officer
#### JORDAN v. STATE.

No. 20975.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 24, 1940.

H. A. C. Brummett, of Dickens, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of hogs; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Notice- of appeal was given October 3, 1939. The statement of facts was filed in the trial court January 8, 1940, which was more than 90 days after notice of appeal was given. This was too late. See Subdivision 5 of Article 760, C.C.P. In the absence of á statement of facts we are unable to appraise appellant’s bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# Looking Beyond Professional Military Education to Evaluating Officers

/ Published Feb. 14, 2019

 JFSC Students at the Joint and Combined Warfighting School, National Defense University during JPME-II published, "Looking Beyond Professional Military Education to Evaluating Officers" online in War on the Rocks, 8 Aug 2018.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1430 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1430

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To provide for a temporary increase in the public debt limit.





103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1430

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
     To provide for a temporary increase in the public debt limit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.

    During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act and ending on September 30, 1993, the public debt limit set forth 
in subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, 
shall be temporarily increased to $4,370,000,000,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 2 (legislative 
      day, April 1), 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Exhibit 15

                           Accountants' Acknowledgment


Footstar, Inc.
Mahwah, New Jersey

Board of Directors:

Re:  Registration Statements Numbers 33-20731 and 33-30011 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report  dated July 17,  1997  related to our review of
interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                                  /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
August 4, 1997


                                       21