69664 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 224 / Monday, November 20, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9H Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated September 1, 2000, and effective

September 16, 2000, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ACE IA Algona, IA [Revised]

Algona Municipal Airport, IA

(Lat. 43°04′40′′N., long. 94°16′19′′W)

Algona NDB

(Lat. 43°04′53′′N., long. 94°16′21′′W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile

radius of Algona Municipal Airport, and

within 3.1 miles each side of the 294° bearing

of the Algona NDB extending from the 6.4-

mile radius to 10 miles northwest of the

airport.

* * * * *

Issued in Kansas City, MO, on November

3, 2000.

H.J. Lyons,

Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.

[FR Doc. 00–29660 Filed 11–17–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 99–ANM–14]

RIN 2120–AA66

Alteration of VOR Federal Airway; CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action eliminates a

segment of Federal Airway V–382 (V–

382) between Bryce Canyon, UT, Very

High Frequency Omnidirectional Range/

Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) and

Grand Junction, CO, VORTAC. The FAA

is taking this action to delete a portion

of the airway because the flight

inspection found the current route

segment unusable for navigation.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 25,

2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken

McElroy, Airspace and Rules Division,

ATA–400, Office of Air Traffic Airspace

Management, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone: (202) 267–8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On July 5, 2000, the FAA proposed to

amend 14 CFR part 71 (part 71) to

eliminate a segment of V–382 (65 FR

41388). This action was considered

necessary due to the failure of repeated

flight inspections on this segment of V–

382. Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking by

submitting written comments on the

proposal to the FAA. No comments

were received. Except of editorial

changes, this amendment is the same as

that proposed in the notice.

The Rule

The FAA is amending part 71 to

modify V–382 by eliminating the route

segment between Bryce Canyon and

Grand Junction, CO, VORTAC. Since

1998, V–382 has been unusable between

Bryce Canyon, UT, VORTAC and the

Grand Junction, CO, VORTAC. This

segment of V–382 no longer passes

flight inspection and is out of service.

The action retains the route segment

from Grand Junction, CO, VORTAC to

Durango, CO, VORTAC.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule, when

promulgated, will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Domestic VOR Federal airways are

published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA

Order 7400.9H dated September 1, 2000,

and effective September 16, 2000, which

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Domestic VOR Federal airway

listed in this document would be

published subsequently in the order.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9H,

Airspace Designations and Reporting

Points, dated September 1, 2000, and

effective September 16, 2000, is

amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal

Airways.

* * * * *

V–382 [Revised]

From Grand Junction, CO; Cones, CO; to

Durango, CO.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on November

13, 2000.

Reginald C. Matthews,

Manager, Airspace and Rules Division.

[FR Doc. 00–29659 Filed 11–17–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00–ANM–20]

RIN 2120–AA66

Amend Legal Description of Jet Route

J–501

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action amends the legal

description of Jet Route 501 (J–501) in

Canadian Airspace due to the

decommissioning of the Camp Scott,

British Columbia (BC), Radio Beacon

(RBN).

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 224 / Monday, November 20, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 69665

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 25,

2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken

McElroy, Airspace and Rules Division,

ATA–400, Office of Air Traffic Airspace

Management, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone: (202) 267–8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On June 29, 2000, the FAA was

notified by Transport Canada that Camp

Scott, BC, RBN was decommissioned.

This decommissioning action affects J–

501 within Canada.

The Rule

This action amends title 14 CFR part

71 (part 71) by amending the legal

description of J–501 in Canadian

airspace due to the decommissioning of

the Camp Scott, BC, RBN. The FAA is

taking this action to remove reference to

the Camp Scott RBN in the description

of J–501. The decommissioning of the

Camp Scott RBN will generate a break

in the J–501 between the Tofino, BC,

RBN and the Sandspit, BC, very high

frequency omnidirectional range/

tactical air navigation facility. This

action provides an uninterrupted route

on J–501.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule, when

promulgated, will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Jet routes are published in paragraph

2004 of FAA Order 7400.9H, dated

September 1, 2000, and effective

September 16, 2000, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The jet route listed in this

document will be published

subsequently in the order.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9H,

Airspace Designations and Reporting

Points, dated September 1, 2000, and

effective September 16, 2000, is

amended as follows:

Paragraph 2004—Jet Routes.

* * * * *

J–501 [Amended]

From San Marcus, CA, via Big Sur, CA;

Point Reyes, CA, via Rogue Valley, OR;

Hoquiam, WA; INT Hoquiam 354° and

Tatoosh, WA, 162° radials; Tatoosh; Tofino,

BC, Canada, RBN. From Sandspit, BC,

Canada; Biorka Island, AK; Yakutat, AK;

Johnstone Point, AK; Anchorage, AK;

Sparrevohn, AK; Bethel, AK; to the INT of

the Bethel 258° radial and the Anchorage

CTA/FIR boundary, excluding the airspace

within Canada.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on November

13, 2000.

Reginald C. Matthews,

Manager, Airspace and Rules Division.

[FR Doc. 00–29658 Filed 11–17–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Parts 1 and 311

Federal Civil Penalties Inflation

Adjustment Act of 1990, as Amended

by the Debt Collection Improvement

Act of 1996

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission

(FTC).

ACTION: Final rule amendments.

SUMMARY: The Commission is correcting

certain previously published

adjustments to civil penalty amounts

within its jurisdiction. These

corrections will maintain the civil

penalty amounts currently published in

Commission Rule 1.98, as last adjusted

in 1996. These corrections will not

affect certain related amendments

intended to incorporate previously

omitted adjustments in civil penalty

amounts for Recycled Oil Rule

violations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: These amendments are

effective November 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex

Tang, Attorney, Office of General

Counsel, FTC, 600 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580,

(202) 326–2447, atang@ftc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Commission is correcting certain civil

penalty inflation adjustments, 65 FR

60857 (Oct. 13, 2000), that were

intended to update civil penalty

amounts that the Commission last

adjusted for inflation in 1996 under the

Federal Civil Penalties Inflation

Adjustment Act of 1990 (FCPIAA), as

amended by the Debt Collection

Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA), 28

U.S.C. 2461 note. See 61 FR 54548 (Oct.

21, 1996), 55840 (Oct. 29, 1996). Section

5 of the FCPIAA requires, in relevant

part, that any inflation ‘‘increase’’ since

the last adjustment be rounded to the

nearest multiple of $10 (for ‘‘penalties

less than or equal to $100’’), the nearest

$100 (for ‘‘penalties greater than $100

but less than or equal to $1,000’’), the

nearest $1,000 (for ‘‘penalties greater

than $1,000 but less than or equal to

$10,000’’), or the nearest $5,000 (for

‘‘penalties greater than $10,000 but less

than or equal to $100,000’’).

In determining how these rounding

categories apply, the Commission had

referred to the original statutory penalty

amounts. For example, for penalties

under section 5 of the FTC Act, the

Commission used the rounding category

‘‘for penalties greater than $1,000 but

less than or equal to $10,000’’ (i.e.,

increases are rounded in multiples of

$1,000), even though section 5 penalties

had been increased to $11,000 in 1996.

The rounding categories, however, do

not expressly rely upon or refer to the

original statutory amounts of the

penalties, nor is the Commission aware

of any legislative history to support a

retroactive reading of ‘‘penalties’’ once

the original statutory penalty amount

has been increased. Rather, in

calculating increases, the statute

expressly refers to the increase since the

penalties were last set ‘‘or adjusted’’ by

law. See FCPIAA Sec. 5(b) (defining

cost-of-living adjustment). Thus, for

example, increases in the penalty for a

violation of section 5 of the FTC Act

(i.e., $11,000) must be rounded in

multiples of $5,000 (rather than

multiples of $1,000, as when the penalty

was only $10,000).