alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Agenda

May 7, 2015

1:00 – 1:15 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance Office

1:15 –2:15 Update from Subcommittees

 Affordability and Accessibility Subcommittee – Big Data and Price Optimization

 International Development Subcommittee – Implementation of International 

Standards

 Domestic Prudential Issues Subcommittee– Principle Based Reserving

2:15 – 3:15 Discussion of Natural Catastrophes and the Role of Mitigation

 Presentation by Eric Letvin (U.S. National Security Council) on President 

Obama’s Executive Order 13690, Establishing a Federal Flood Risk 

Management Standard

 Presentation by Julie Rochman (Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety) 

on the impact of Wind, Wildfire, and Drought on the Insurance Industry, and 

associated mitigation options

3:15 – 3:30 Break

3:30 – 4:30 Discussion of Cybersecurity

 Presentation by Superintendent Lawsky (New York Department of Financial 

Services) on Cybersecurity in the Insurance Sector

 Presentation by Mark Weil (Marsh & McLennan UK) on the Role of Insurance in 

Managing and Mitigating Cybersecurity Risk

 Presentation by Brian Peretti (U.S. Treasury) on Treasury’s Role Supporting

Cybersecurity for the Financial Sector

4:30 – 4:45 Discussion of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program

4:45 – 4:55 Discussion of IAIS Stakeholder Engagement

4:55 – 5:00 New Business

5:00 Adjourn
#### TEXAS EMPLOYERS’ INS. ASS’N v. KIRBY, District Judge, et al.

No. 15094.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 25, 1941.

See, also, 150 S.W.2d 123.

Lawther, Cramer, Perry & Johnson, Harry P. Lawther, and Wm. M. Cramer, all of Dallas,-for relator.

No appearance in Supreme Court for respondents.

CRITZ, Justice.

This is a motion to file an original petition for the issuance by this Court of writs of prohibition and injunction. It is filed by Texas Employers’ Insurance Association, as relator, against Hon. H. Fountain Kirby, Judge of the Seventy-seventh Judicial District of Texas, Hon. Sam Holland, Judge of the Third Judicial District of Texas, Jesse Sweeten, Sheriff of Henderson County, Texas, Ed Landman and Addie B, Landman, his wife, as respondents. The petition sought to be filed accompanies the motion.

The matter here involved was first presented to the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas. The opinion of that Court, by Judge Looney, very fully and correctly states the facts and the relief sought. Substantially the same facts are stated .in the petition here sought to be filed, as were stated in the petition filed in the Court of Civil Appeals, and the same relief sought. The Court of Civil Appeals very correctly held that it had no jurisdiction to grant the relief sought in that Court. In the interest of brevity, we refer to and adopt the statement contained in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. 150 S.W.2d 123.

A reading of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals will demonstrate that the relator here seeks to have this Court issue writs of prohibition and injunction in a matter not otherwise before this Court. Furthermore, such writs are not sought for the purpose of protecting or enforcing any judgment of this Court, or for the purpose of protecting or enforcing its jurisdiction. It is settled that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to issue the writs of prohibition or injunction in such a case. 24 Tex.Jur., p. 150, § 110; 11 Tex.Jur., p. 183, § 118, Id., p. 185, § 119; Milam County Oil Mill Co. v. Bass, 106 Tex. 260, 163 S.W. 577; City of Laredo v. Martin, 52 Tex. 548; Wells v. Littlefield, 62 Tex. 28; Churchill v. Martin, 65 Tex. 367; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State, 107 Tex. 1, 11, 106 S.W. 326, 327; Curtis v. Moore, 130 Tex. 396, 110 S.W.2d 1146.

The motion to file is overruled.
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Shareholders


of Advanced Photonix, Inc.


Ann Arbor, Michigan





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-120317, No. 333-128706, No. 333-132976, No. 333-147802, No. 333-170607, No. 133-171390, and No. 333-195689) and Form S-8 (No. 333-08972, No. 333-95301, No. 333-57068, No. 333-124708 and No. 333-147012) of Advanced Photonix, Inc. of our report dated June 30, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule which appear in this Form 10-K.











/s/ BDO USA, LLP


Troy, Michigan


June 30, 2014
```

Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Deep Well Oil & Gas, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Curtis
J. Sparrow, Chief (Principal) Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ Curtis J. Sparrow
Curtis J. Sparrow
Chief (Principal) Financial Officer
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

__________ ______________ No. 14

- 13444 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:13

- cr - 00036

- LGW

- JEG

- 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JEREMIAH NATHANIEL BENNETT, Defendant

- Appe llant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________ (November 4, 2015) Before WILSON, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CU RI AM : B. Reid Zeh III, appointed counsel for Jere miah Bennett in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

Case: 14-13444 Date Filed: 11/04/2015 Page: 1 of 22 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the ent ire record reveals that counsel’ s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no ar guable issues of merit, counsel’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , Bennett’s motion to discharge

coun sel and appoint new counsel is DENIED , and Bennett’ s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 14-13444 Date Filed: 11/04/2015 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          54,919
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,251,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                    58,080
<INVENTORY>                                  5,882,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,172,700
<PP&E>                                       6,723,365
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,757,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,337,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,705,887
<BONDS>                                      2,642,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,402
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,802,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,337,840
<SALES>                                     17,793,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,793,072
<CGS>                                        5,977,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,977,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,120,136<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             263,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,594,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                   593,068
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,001,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,001,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
<FN>
<F1>Selling, general and administrative
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,201
<SECURITIES>                                     6,587
<RECEIVABLES>                                  288,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               372,245
<PP&E>                                         349,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,160,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,020
<BONDS>                                        323,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           848
<OTHER-SE>                                     668,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,160,805
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               515,626
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  475,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,301
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
National Council on Disability

An independent federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress 

to enhance the quality of life for all Americans with disabilities and their families.

1331 F Street, NW ■ Suite 850 ■ Washington, DC 20004

202-272-2004 Voice ■ 202-272-2022 Fax ■ www.ncd.gov

January 22, 2024

CERTIFICATION of CLOSED MEETING

I hereby certify, as NCD’s General Counsel, in my opinion the meeting of the National 

Council on Disability on February 8th, 2024 at 5:10 p.m. ET may be closed to the public 

pursuant to 5 USC 552b (c)(2) of the Government in Sunshine Act (information relating 

solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency). 

A copy of this certification, together with a statement from the NCD Chairman setting 

forth the time and place of the meeting, and the persons present, shall be retained by 

the agency. The agency shall maintain a complete transcript or electronic recording

adequate to record fully the proceedings of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, 

closed to the public, except that in the case of a meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed 

to the public pursuant to specified exceptions within the Act, the agency shall maintain 

either such a transcript or recording, or a set of minutes. 

Joan Durocher

General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 371 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 371

 Designating June 10, 1995, as ``Portuguese American Friendship Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1994

Mr. Pombo introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating June 10, 1995, as ``Portuguese American Friendship Day''.

Whereas history has shown that Portugal has always felt a universal destiny and 
        a calling to establish a vast network of relationships beyond Europe;
Whereas June 10, Portugal's National Day, celebrates the life and work of the 
        16th century poet Luis Vaz de Camoes of Portugal, whose work extols the 
        courage and exploits of Portuguese explorers who sailed to points beyond 
        the horizon;
Whereas thousands of Portuguese have embarked on their own voyages to the United 
        States, and today over 2,000,000 Americans are able to trace their 
        ancestry to Portugal;
Whereas Portuguese Americans have distinguished themselves as honest, hard-
        working, patriotic, and family-oriented;
Whereas Portuguese Americans have achieved an important place in American 
        culture through their participation in the arts, commerce, academics, 
        sports, politics, and religion;
Whereas Portugal and the United States have had friendly and cordial relations 
        since American independence;
Whereas Portugal and the United States continue to work together, cooperating 
        through their membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, to 
        promote peace and to adapt to the challenges of a changing world in 
        light of the lifting of the Iron Curtain;
Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship based on mutual 
        respect and a sharing of interests and ideals, particularly a deeply 
        held commitment to democratic values; and
Whereas it is appropriate to designate a national day to honor Portuguese 
        Americans and celebrate the unique contributions they have made 
        throughout the history of the United States and to honor the Portuguese 
        people and their national day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That June 10, 1995, is 
designated as ``Portuguese American Friendship Day'', and the President 
is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the 
people of the United States to observe the day with appropriate 
programs and activities.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1354

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to require States

to have laws that would permit a parent who is chronically ill or near

death to name a standby guardian for a minor child without surrendering

parental rights.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mrs. MALONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act

to require States to have laws that would permit a parent

who is chronically ill or near death to name a standby

guardian for a minor child without surrendering parental

rights.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Standby Guardianship

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 1354 IH

1 SEC. 2. STATES REQUIRED TO HAVE STANDBY GUARDIAN2 SHIP LAW AS A CONDITION OF ELIGIBILITY

3 FOR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR FOSTER CARE

4 AND ADOPTION ASSISTANCE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part E of title IV of the Social

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 670–679) is amended by inserting

7 after section 477 the following:

8 ‘‘SEC. 478. STANDBY GUARDIANSHIP LAWS AND PROCE9 DURES.

10 ‘‘To be eligible for payments under this part, a State

11 must have in effect laws and procedures that permit any

12 parent who is chronically ill or near death, without surren13 dering parental rights, to designate a standby guardian

14 for the parent’s minor children, whose authority would

15 take effect upon—

16 ‘‘(1) the death of the parent;

17 ‘‘(2) the mental incapacity of the parent; or

18 ‘‘(3) the physical debilitation and consent of the

19 parent.’’.

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

21 subsection (a) shall take effect at the end of the first cal22 endar quarter that begins 60 or more months after the

23 date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to pay24 ments under part E of title IV of the Social Security Act

25 for the quarter and payments made under such part for

26 any succeeding quarter.
3

•HR 1354 IH

Æ
Agenda -- November 2005 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings October 27-28, 2005 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 5:00 p.m. on 

Wednesday, October 26 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and kameke.sweeney@ny.frb.org. 

Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still 

appreciated. 

I. Borrowing Estimates Central 

Estimate

Range that would 

not surprise you 

 October-December 

 Ending Cash Balance 

 January-March 

 Ending Cash Balance 

 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

 FY2006 

 

III. Quarterly Note Issuance 

 3-year note 

 5-year note 

 10-year note 

 10-year reopening 

 Avg. 2-year note, Nov – Jan 

 Avg. 5-year note, Nov – Jan 

 10-year TIPS 

 20-year TIPS 

Discussion Topics 

1. What do you see as the major risks to the budget for this fiscal year? Do you think Treasury's 

current financing schedule provides enough flexibility to handle uncertain financing needs going 

forward? 

2. To accommodate the 30-year bond during the Quarterly Refunding, Treasury is considering 

auctioning monthly 5-year notes at month end. Please describe the advantages and 

disadvantages to Treasury of moving the 5-year auction to month end. 

3. Treasury is studying the terms (rates, loan maturity, same-day or forward settlement) of a 

proposed standing, nondiscretionary securities lending facility. How should Treasury set these 

terms so that borrowing from the facility is economical only when delivery fails in a security 

become chronic or systemic?
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Meeting December 19, 2018
Office of Justice Programs
Third Floor Main Conference Room (MCR)
810 7th Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2018
Time: 10:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time

AgendaMeeting SummaryMembership RosterMeeting Webcast
  
Date Published: December 19, 2018
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated September 1, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on September 25, 2000, (65 FR 57621), Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 
Attn: Jeffrey A. Weiss, 1011 North Avendell Avenue, P.O. Box 1217, 
Zebulon, North Carolina 27597-2309, made application by renewal to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer 
of remifentanil (9739), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
Schedule II.
    The remifentanil is being imported for the production of Ultiva 
dosage forms and for research and new product development.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Glaxo Wellcome Inc. to import 
remifentanil is consistent with the public interest and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated 
Glaxo Wellcome Inc. on a regular basis to ensure that the company's 
continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These 
investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, audits of the company's records, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, section 
1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: November 7, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-30291 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### HARTSFIELD et ux. v. A. O. REECE & SON et al.

No. 10768.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 13, 1940.

Kenneth Faxon and J. T. Canales, both of Brownsville, for appellants.

Brown & Criss and Osee Fristoe, all of Harlingen, for appellees.

.PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion. See Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294.