alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Faulk. Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: mango salsa <mangosalsa442@gmail.com> Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:33 PM EAS (OST) Mokulele Airlines and Kalaupapa EAS

DearDepartment OfTransportation, I am writingto support Mokulele Airline's 4 year bidto link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, multiple islands and ease ofbooking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline etc.) 

### Itis important we have safe, stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa. Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years. 

## 0**~------------··--·-**
Aloha, Catalina Hartwell

1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 13

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
      relating to limitations on the amounts of contributions and 
expenditures that may be made in connection with campaigns for election 
                           to public office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2009

Ms. Kaptur (for herself and Mr. Higgins) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
      relating to limitations on the amounts of contributions and 
expenditures that may be made in connection with campaigns for election 
                           to public office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Congress shall have power to set limits on the amount 
of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of 
expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a 
candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, Federal 
office.
    ``Section 2. A State shall have power to set limits on the amount 
of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of 
expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a 
candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, State or 
local office.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have power to implement and enforce 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Reverse Engineering Goldwater-Nichols: China's Joint Force Reforms

/ Published Feb. 12, 2019
"Reverse Engineering Goldwater-Nichols: China's Joint Force Reforms"
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1511 

AN ACT 

To amend the Torture Victims Relief Act of 1998 to authorize appropriations to provide assistance for domestic and 

foreign programs and centers for the treatment of victims of torture, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1511 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Torture Victims Relief 

3 Reauthorization Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR DOMES5 TIC TREATMENT CENTERS FOR VICTIMS OF 

6 TORTURE. 

7 Section 5(b)(1) of the Torture Victims Relief Act of 

8 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2152 note) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Of 

10 the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the 

11 Department of Health and Human Services for fis12 cal years 2010 and 2011, there are authorized to be 

13 appropriated to carry out subsection (a) 

14 $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2010 and 

15 2011.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FOR17 EIGN TREATMENT CENTERS FOR VICTIMS OF 

18 TORTURE. 

19 Section 4(b)(1) of the Torture Victims Relief Act of 

20 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2152 note) is amended to read as follows: 

21 ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Of 

22 the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 

23 years 2010 and 2011 pursuant to chapter 1 of part 

24 I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, there are 

25 authorized to be appropriated to the President to 
3 

•HR 1511 EH

1 carry out section 130 of such Act $12,000,000 for 

2 each of the fiscal years 2010 and 2011.’’. 

3 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 

4 UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTION TO THE 

5 UNITED NATIONS VOLUNTARY FUND FOR 

6 VICTIMS OF TORTURE. 

7 Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fis8 cal years 2010 and 2011 pursuant to chapter 3 of part 

9 I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, there are author10 ized to be appropriated to the President for a voluntary 

11 contribution to the United Nations Voluntary Fund for 

12 Victims of Torture $12,000,000 for each of the fiscal 

13 years 2010 and 2011. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1511 

AN ACT 

To amend the Torture Victims Relief Act of 1998 

other purposes. for the treatment of victims of torture, and for for domestic and foreign programs and centers to authorize appropriations to provide assistance
Order entered January 23 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00954
- CR
BARBARA KENNEDY WARD , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09
- 73060
- V



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On January 20, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the app eal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel Riann Moore; (3) Ms. Moore’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is that she “is still working on it”; and (4) Ms. Moore represented that she anticipates filing the brief within before the thirty

- day period provided by the January 20, 2015 abatement order expires.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by FEBRUARY 19, 2015 . No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.We DIRE CT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to

counsel for all parties.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### THOMPSON v. STATE.

No. 24034.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 5, 1948.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of twelve years.

*820The indictment in this case, in addition to charging the primary offense of burglary, charged one prior conviction for a like offense.

There are no bills of exception to the court’s charge.

The evidence adduced by the State is ample to sustain the conviction of the offense of burglary, as charged. The State’s evidence relating to his former conviction of a like offense is also sufficient to support the jury’s finding on that issue.

Appellant did not testify or offer any affirmative defense.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
EXHIBIT 35.1



SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity
as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2015, among Mercedes-Benz
Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1, as Issuer, Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA
LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”), for the period from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016
(the “Reporting Period”).



I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that:



| | (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement
has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 20, 2017





| | /s/ Brian T. Stevens                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Name: Brian T. Stevens              
| | Title: Vice President and Controller
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1273 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1273

  To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 
            furniture of unspun fibrous vegetable materials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1993

   Mr. Andrews of Texas (for himself and Mr. Archer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 
            furniture of unspun fibrous vegetable materials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON FURNITURE OF 
              UNSPUN FIBROUS VEGETABLE MATERIALS.

    Heading 9902.94.01 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 takes effect on 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been a lower duty if the 
amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or withdrawal, 
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,347
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,352
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,707
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             472
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               511
<LOANS>                                        312,816
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,116
<DEPOSITS>                                     269,565
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,703
<LONG-TERM>                                     19,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,669
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  60,848
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,992
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,202
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   319
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,513
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,617
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,267
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,246
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      141
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,721
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,733
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.08
<LOANS-NON>                                        467
<LOANS-PAST>                                       393
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,557
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        1
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,698
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,698
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 97

Designating the week commencing October 3, 1993, as ‘‘National Aviation

Education Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. OBERSTAR introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week commencing October 3, 1993, as

‘‘National Aviation Education Week’’.

Whereas aviation plays a vital role in the everyday lives of

Americans;

Whereas the aviation industry makes important contributions

to the economic development of the United States and its

rapid growth has created a need for persons trained in

the areas of aviation management, operations, and maintenance;

Whereas the aviation industry has increasingly become more

complex and technical and the future contributions of
2

•HJ 97 IH

aviation to the United States are dependent upon an informed and educated public;

Whereas it is important that schools within the United States

actively encourage students to become interested in aviation theories and principles, particularly students that

have often been underrepresented in technical fields relating to aviation such as women and minorities; and

Whereas a number of States annually recognize the importance of aviation to our Nation and the value of encouraging students to study aviation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning October 3, 1993, is designated

4 as ‘‘National Aviation Education Week’’. The President

5 is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe the week

7 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
#### WHITE v. KIRK et al.

No. 4017.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Jan. 23, 1941.

W. A. Hadden, of Fort Stockton, and Floyd Jones, of Breckenridge, for appellant.

Johnson & Crumpton, of Fort Stockton, for appellees.

WALTHALL, Justice.

No briefs have been filed in this court by either party. There is nothing to review.

The appeal is dismissed.
#### GRIFFIN v. STATE.

No. 21367.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 15, 1941.

J. D. Todd, Jr., of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for rape; punishment assessed at death.

The record reflects no complaint of procedural matters. No bills of exception are brought forward challenging the action of the trial court in any particular.

The only question, therefore, is the sufficiency of the evidence. The facts show one of the most brutal crimes it has ever been the painful duty of this court to review.

Appellant secured a hammer and broke into the home of Mr. and Mrs. Haynes about three o’clock at night. The Hayneses were asleep. They were aroused by the presence of appellant. He struck Mr. Haynes on the head with the hammer and then struck Mrs. Haynes on the head several times with it. While Mrs. Haynes was bloody from the effect of the blows administered, and Mr. Haynes was unconscious, appellant raped Mrs. Haynes. When he left the house, appellant took with him a pair of shoes belonging to Mr. Haynes. Blood was all over the room; the mattress and bedclothes were saturated with it. Officers who reached the house a' few minutes after the crime said: “It looked like a beef had been killed in there.”. In his flight from the house appellant threw the hammer away. Officers found at appellant’s home the shoes belonging to Mr. Haynes, and the bloody clothes of appellant. He told the officers where he had thrown the hammer, went with them and pointed out the place where it was found.

The facts overwhelmingly establish appellant’s guilt, and show that he richly deserves the punishment assessed.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.3

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                     TO THE
                               JARDEN CORPORATION
                        2003 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

     The following amendments are hereby made to the Jarden Corporation (the
"Company") 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (the "Plan"):

     WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 to the Plan was effected as of April 12, 2005 in
order to change the discount offered to Participants in response to the
revisions made to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
("FAS123R") in October 2004; and

     WHEREAS, the Securities and Exchange Commission has changed the effective
date for the new stock-option accounting rules to take effect for fiscal years
starting after June 15, 2005; and

     WHEREAS, at the current time, the Company believes it is in the best
interest of the Company not to effect the changes to the Plan resulting from
Amendment No. 1.

     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

     The amendments to the Plan, particularly of Sections 6 and 7 thereto,
effected by Amendment No. 1 to the Plan are hereby eliminated in their entirety
such that Amendment No. 1 to the Plan is null and void and has no further force
and effect.



                                  CERTIFICATION

     The undersigned, being the Secretary of Jarden Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, hereby certifies that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of
Amendment No. 2 to the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of this
1st day of May 2005, and that said Amendment No. 2 to the Jarden Corporation
2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is in full force and effect on the date
hereof, without further amendment or modification.


                                                 /s/ Ian G.H. Ashken
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Secretary of Jarden Corporation
A01A0188.

#### PUENTE v. THE STATE.

(548 SE2d 109)

Phipps, Judge.

Convicted of armed robbery, Robert Puente appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient. We find that the evidence was sufficient and affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict,1 the evidence authorized the jury to find that on July 27, 1999, Puente and Daniel Kenast entered a Fitzgerald’s Texaco gas station in Bartow County.2 Kenast wore over his face a hat with eye holes cut out. Puente’s face was uncovered.

Puente pulled a pistol from his waist area, approached the counter, pointed the gun at the cashier and told her, “How about fixing us up with some money.” The cashier took everything from the register drawer and handed it to Kenast when he reached over the counter. Puente and Kenast left the store in a car driven by Kenast’s girlfriend, Tommi Lee Dinkins.

The cashier immediately called the police and reported the robbery. She described the getaway car and the direction of its travel. Very shortly thereafter, a Bartow County deputy sheriff spotted the car traveling south on 1-75 as reported. A high-speed chase ensued, which ended when Dinkins crashed into a UPS truck parked alongside the roadway. Puente, Kenast and Dinkins were arrested.

A store manager testified that approximately $374 was taken in the robbery. Police found $131 in Puente’s pocket in denominations of thirty-six $1, seven $5, and three $20 bills. On the floorboard of the car near the console, police found a wad of fifty $1, six $5, seven $10 and five $20 bills totaling $250 and numerous credit card authorization slips from the gas station.

The cashier identified Puente, the credit card authorizations and the hat with cut-out eye holes that had been worn by Kenast.

The hat was retrieved from an area where the driver of another vehicle saw something being thrown from the getaway car. The gun was not found, but police found a box of .22 caliber ammunition in the trunk of the car.

*399Decided April 26, 2001.

*Christopher G. Paul,*for appellant.

*T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Mickey R. Thacker, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Dinkins testified against Puente and Kenast, detailing their actions as the planners and perpetrators of the robbery. She testified that before the robbery Kenast had shown her a pistol, that Puente and Kenast had told her it was .22 caliber, that Puente had it during the robbery and that he threw it from the car during the chase. Dinkins’s car and its tag also matched the description given by the cashier.

We find that the evidence was sufficient to allow a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Puente committed the offense of armed robbery.3 Thus, we affirm his conviction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Smith, P. J., and Barnes, J., concur.*

1

*Gunter v. State,*237 Ga. App. 863, 864 (517 SE2d 105) (1999).

2

 Kenast’s conviction for armed robbery was affirmed by unpublished opinion, 245 Ga. App. XXV (2000).

3

*Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).