alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Jean-Pierre M. Ergas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Corporation (the Company) and Kevin C. Kern, Vice-President of
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 4, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14, 2004



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Jean-Pierre M. Ergas            
|Jean-Pierre M. Ergas                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                   
|Kevin C. Kern                       
|Vice-President of Administration and
|Chief Financial Officer
May 25, 2016

Mr. Thomas C. Grossman

Chief Flight Instructor

Western Michigan University College of Aviation 

237 N Helmer Rd., Battle Creek, MI 49037

Dear Mr. Grossman:

This is in response to your letter dated September 19, 2014, petitioning the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Western Michigan University (WMU) [Docket No.: 

FAA-2014-0734] for an exemption from Part 141 Appendix B4, C4, and D4 of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

You state that WMU currently holds an FAA issued Letter of Authorization (LOA) for the 

two Frasca training devices that allows WMU to use these devices, in part, in accordance 

with “section 141.41(b) – As allowed within the FAA-approved part 141 training course”, 

“section 141.55 (d) & (e) – As allowed within the FAA-approved part 141 reduced hours 

training course” and “section 141.57 – As allowed within the FAA-approved part 141 special 

training curricula.” This exemption, if granted, would allow WMU to continue to train 

students in the same devices and to the same standards that were previously allowed.

The FAA determined that WMU does not require relief from Appendix B paragraph (4)(c) or 

Appendix D paragraph (4)(c) because allowances for pilot schools with an approved 141 

course curriculum for the private pilot certificate or commercial pilot certificate can use the 

current FAA approved Frasca Advanced Aviation Training Device (AATD) for the same 

credit allowances as provided in the former LOA’s. These maximum credit allowances for 

the private and commercial pilot certificate applications concerning minimum experience 

requirements remain intact.

On April 21, 2016 the FAA published a final rule titled “Aviation Training Device Credit for 

Pilot Certification” in the Federal Register [Docket No.: FAA–2015–1846; Amdt. Nos. 61–

136, 141–18]. This rule which became effective on May 12, 2016, increases the allowed use 

of AATD’s under part 141 Appendix C for the instrument rating training requirements. 

Because the rule increased allowances when using an AATD during training, your petition 

for exemption from Part 141 Appendix C is no longer necessary. 
2

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action 

on your petition.

Sincerely,

//s//

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standard Services
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1061 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1061

  To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 
          thiothiamine hydrochloride, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

   Mr. Rose introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 
          thiothiamine hydrochloride, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON THIOTHIAMINE 
              HYDROCHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.30.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and 
inserting ``12/31/94''.
    (b) Technical Amendments.--The article description for heading 
9902.30.91 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(CAS No. 2443-50-7)'' before 
        ``(provided''; and
            (2) by striking ``2934.10.10'' and inserting 
        ``2934.10.50''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
amendment made by section 1(a) applies with respect to goods entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1(a) applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been a lower duty if the 
amendment made by section 1(a) had applied to such entry or withdrawal, 
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1428 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1428

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to provide wartime disability compensation for certain 
                   veterans with Parkinson's disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2009

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to provide wartime disability compensation for certain 
                   veterans with Parkinson's disease.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE 
              FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WHO SERVED IN THE REPUBLIC OF 
              VIETNAM.

    Section 1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(I) Parkinson's disease becoming manifest to a degree of 
        disability of 10 percent or more.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1335 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1335

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                            April 21 (legislative day, April 19), 1993.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1335) entitled ``An Act making emergency supplemental appropriations 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other 
purposes'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

That the following sum is appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to provide emergency supplemental 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for 
other purposes, namely:

                          DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

        advances to the unemployment trust fund and other funds

    For an additional amount for ``Advances to the unemployment trust 
fund and other funds'', $4,000,000,000, to remain available until 
September 30, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Seamon David WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE at Texas, Appellee.

No. 22037.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1942.

Chas. H. Dean and Vincent Tudor, both of Plainview, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment assessed being 99 years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed, his affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, and at his request the same is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Francis X. McCarthy, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/    FRANCIS X. MCCARTHY, JR.                                                        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|Francis X. McCarthy, Jr. Chief Financial
Officer of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc.



November 14, 2003
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1276

To establish the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use firearms

in defense of self, family, or home, and to provide for the enforcement

of such right.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Mr. BARTLETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

AUGUST 3, 1993

Additional sponsors: Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr.

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. CRANE, Mr. FIELDS of

Texas, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. TORKILDSEN, Mr.

SOLOMON, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. COBLE, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. HUNTER,

Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr.

STUMP, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ARMEY, Mr.

BACHUS of Alabama, Mr. BUYER, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. RAVENEL, Mr. BREWSTER, Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas, Mr.

HERGER, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. BARCIA

of Michigan, and Mr. BONILLA

A BILL

To establish the right to obtain firearms for security, and

to use firearms in defense of self, family, or home, and

to provide for the enforcement of such right.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1276 SC

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizens’ Self-Defense

3 Act of 1993’’.

4 SEC. 2. RIGHT TO OBTAIN FIREARMS FOR SECURITY, AND

5 TO USE FIREARMS IN DEFENSE OF SELF,

6 FAMILY, OR HOME; ENFORCEMENT.

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF RIGHT.—A person not pro8 hibited by Federal law from receiving a firearm shall have

9 the right to obtain firearms for security, and to use fire10 arms in defense of self, family, or home.

11 (b) FIREARM DEFINED.—As used in subsection (a),

12 the term ‘‘firearm’’ means a—

13 (1) shotgun (as defined in section 921(a)(5) of

14 title 18, United States Code);

15 (2) rifle (as defined in section 921(a)(7) of such

16 title); or

17 (3) handgun (as defined in section 10 of Public

18 Law 99–408).

19 (c) ENFORCEMENT OF RIGHT.—

20 (1) IN GENERAL.—A person whose right under

21 subsection (a) is violated in any manner may bring

22 an action in any United States district court against

23 the United States, any State, or any person for

24 damages, injunctive relief, and such other relief as

25 the court deems appropriate.
3

•HR 1276 SC

1 (2) AUTHORITY TO AWARD A REASONABLE AT2 TORNEY’S FEE.—In an action brought under para3 graph (1), the court, in its discretion, may allow the

4 prevailing party, other than a State, a reasonable

5 attorney’s fee as part of the costs.

6 (d) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—An action may not

7 be brought under subsection (c)(1) after the 5-year period

8 that begins with the date the violation described therein

9 is discovered.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Lynch, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  James F. Lynch |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James F.  Lynch          |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |
| November 9,  2004        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         722,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,304,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,026,634
<PP&E>                                      25,489,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,515,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,325,706
<BONDS>                                     13,837,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     96,000
<COMMON>                                        47,960
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,208,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,515,734
<SALES>                                      1,593,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,593,532
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,104,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,271,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (782,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (782,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (782,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BWAY
CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                             864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                       535
<INVENTORY>                                     48,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,668
<PP&E>                                         112,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,090
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,254
<SALES>                                         91,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,166
<CGS>                                           77,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                       986
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,418
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,418
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
#### BERNARD v. STATE.

No. 21338.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1941.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Feb. 19, 1941.

Maury Hughes, of Dallas, and W. D. Justice, of Athens, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without bills of exception or a statement of facts. It appears from the judgment that appellant waived a trial by jury, entered a plea of guilty, and filed his application for a suspended sentence. The judgment of the court shows that sentence was suspended and further that appellant was ordered released upon entering into recognizance in the sum of $2,000. In view of the fact that the judgment shows that sentence was suspended on application made by the appellant, no appeal could be properly taken by the appellant to this court, as the judgment was not final. Under the circumstances, this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

ICRUEGER, Judge.

At a former day of this term of court, we dismissed the appeal in the case on the ground that the judgment, as the same appeared in the record, shows that appellant had been awarded a suspension of sentence from which no appeal could be prosecuted to this court.

The State has filed a motion for a rehearing accompanied by a certified copy of the judgment from the clerk of the District Court of Henderson County, as well as an affidavit by the clerk in which it is stated that the judgment found in the original transcript was incorrectly copied therein, when in truth and in fact the judgment, as it appears upon the minutes of said court, does not suspend the appellant’s sentence. Therefore, the State’s motion for *1078a rehearing is granted and the case will be disposed of on its merits.

There are no bills of exception complaining of any matter of procedure; nor is there a statement of facts in the record. Consequently the only matter presented for review is the sufficiency of the indictment which appears to be in due order. Therefore, the judgment of this court dismissing the appeal is set aside, the appeal is reinstated, and the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant To


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Deep Well Oil & Gas, Inc. (“the
Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Dr.
Horst A. Schmid, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
              January
      12, 2010By:
              /s/
      Horst A. SchmidDr.
      Horst A. SchmidPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer