alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Quarterly Meeting Agenda**

**March 8, 2018**

**Washington, DC**

**THURSDAY, March 8, 2018**

9:00 AM Eastern, 8:00 AM Central, 7:00 AM Mountain, 6:00 AM Pacific

**LOCATION:**Access Board Conference Room, 1331 F Street NW, Suite 800****

**CALL-IN NUMBER:**1-888-599-8667; Conference ID: 9890793; Conference Title: NCD Meeting; Host Name: Clyde Terry. 

**CART :**https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=NCD-QUARTERLY****

**AGENDA (Eastern Time)**

  9:00 –  9:20 AM	Welcome and Introductions, Chairman Neil Romano

· ​Acceptance of Agenda 

· Roll Call of NCD Council Members 

· Approval of Minutes

· Chairman’s Report

  9:20 –   9:30 AM	Executive Director’s Report, Lisa Grubb

  9:30 – 10:15 AM 	Progress Report Update and Discussion, Amy Nicholas

· David Hutt, National Disability Rights Network (NDRN)   

10:15 – 10:30 AM	BREAK

10:30 – 11:30 AM	Foreign Policy Release and Respondent Panel, Ana Torres-Davis

· Valerie Karr, Ph.D., Assistant Professor at the University of Massachusetts Boston at the School for Global Inclusion and Social Development

· Anne Hayes, Independent Consultant 

· Stephanie Ortoleva, Founding President and Executive Director of 	Women Enabled International (WEI)

· Eric Rosenthal, JD, LL. D, Founder and Executive Director of Disability Rights International (DRI)

11:30 – 12:00 PM    Business Meeting

· Finance Report, Billy Altom and Lisa Grubb 

· Governance Report, Rabia Belt

· Policy Report, Joan Durocher 

· Legislative / Outreach Report, Anne Sommers 

12:00 – 12:15 PM	Training on Council Member Time Reports, Stacey Brown and Lisa 				Grubb 

12:15 –   1:30 PM    LUNCH BREAK

1:30 –   2:00 PM    	Recap of new policy project proposals from October 2017 board meeting

2:00 –  3:00 PM    	Panel of Department of Justice Disability Rights Division representatives regarding rescinded ADA regulations and agency 

activities regarding service animals

· Anne Raish, Acting Chief, Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division, US Department of Justice

· Christina Galindo-Walsh, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division, US Department of Justice

3:00 – 3:15 PM	BREAK

3:15 – 3:45 PM	Public comments (focused on recommendations for Council priorities based on the summary of policy projects earlier 

summarized)

3:45 – 5:00 PM	Council discussion of the slate of projects it will move forward for funding opportunities and the internal work of staff, to begin in the remainder of FY18.

5:00 PM		Adjourn
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1457

To protect the voting rights of homeless citizens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. OWENS, Ms. PELOSI, Ms. NORTON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr.

MORAN, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. MFUME, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr.

ROMERO-BARCELO ́, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. BLACKWELL,

Mr. SLATTERY, and Mr. GONZALEZ) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To protect the voting rights of homeless citizens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voting Rights of

5 Homeless Citizens Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. VOTING RIGHTS OF HOMELESS CITIZENS.

7 No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or

8 standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or ap9 plied by any State or political subdivision to deny or

10 abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to
2

•HR 1457 IH

1 vote because that citizen resides at or in a nontraditional

2 abode.

3 SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT.

4 The Attorney General may commence in the name of

5 the United States a civil action (including an action

6 against a State or political subdivision) or an aggrieved

7 citizen may institute a proceeding under this Act, for in8 junctive relief against a violation of section 2.

9 SEC. 4. RELATIONSHIP TO VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965.

10 This Act shall not be construed to impair any right

11 guaranteed by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C.

12 1973 et seq.).

13 SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

14 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘nontraditional abode’’

15 includes—

16 (1) a supervised publicly or privately operated

17 shelter designed to provide temporary living accom18 modations (including welfare hotels, congregate shel19 ters, and transitional housing for the mentally ill);

20 and

21 (2) a public or private place not designated for,

22 or ordinarily used as, regular sleeping accommoda23 tion for human beings.
3

•HR 1457 IH

1 SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act applies with respect to elections taking place

3 after December 31, 1993.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0165

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

IOLA MAERRIEA JOHNSTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 28, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2022

01/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0165
#### HOSTETTER v. STATE.

No. 19814.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1938.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty.,' of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for misdemeanor swindling, punishment assessed being by fine of $100.-00 and 30 days in jail.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, and would ordinarily call for an affirmance.

However, we observe that while the transcript contains a verdict of guilty, no judgment thereon is shown to have been entered. If there is no .judgment no appeal will lie. Donegan v. State, 89 Tex.Cr.R. 193, 230 S.W. 166; McCallan v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 173, 15 S.W.2d 1049; Articles 783 and 784, C.C.P.(1925)

The appeal is dismissed.
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT Page 1

4885-1587-7448, v. 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SANDFORD SEAY, §

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § CAUSE NO. 22-2452

§ 

TRAVELOKO, INC. d/b/a TRAVELOKO §

and ARNOLD R. LAMOTTE, JR., §

Defendants. §

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

Traveloko, Inc. d/b/a Traveloko hereby notifies the Court that the parties have resolved 

this matter by settlement. The parties will submit a Stipulation of Dismissal as soon as is

practical once all required documents are executed by the parties.

Respectfully submitted,

BY: /s/ Jordan A. Mayfield

JORDAN A. MAYFIELD

State Bar No. 24037051

mayfield@namanhowell.com

MICHAEL SHANE O’DELL

State Bar No. 24065835

NAMAN, HOWELL, SMITH & LEE, PLLC

1300 Summit Avenue, Suite 700

Fort Worth, Texas 76102-4911

Telephone: 817.509-2040

Facsimile: 817.509-2060

sodell@namanhowell.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 3:22-cv-02452-S Document 9 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT Page 2

4885-1587-7448, v. 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Notice of Settlement was served on all 

counsel and/or pro se parties of record in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

5(b)(2) on the 9th day of January, 2023. 

/s/ Jordan A. Mayfield

JORDAN MAYFIELD

Case 3:22-cv-02452-S Document 9 Filed 01/09/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

EUGENIO VARGAS §

§

VS. § ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-430-Y

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL §

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, ET AL. §

ORDER STRIKING SUMMARY-JUDGMENT MOTION

Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Summary

Judgment (doc. 43). After review of the motion, the Court concludes

that it should be, and it is hereby, STRICKEN due to Defendants'

failure to include a table of contents and a table of authorities

with its brief, as is required by this Court's local rules. See N.

D. TEX. L. CIV. R. 7.2(d); 56.1. Defendants may refile their motion

after remedying this deficiency. The Court notes, however, that

pursuant to a separate order issued this same day, it has granted

Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. As a result, the Court

cautions Defendants that, in deciding whether and when to refile their

summary-judgment motion, the Court permits the filing of only one

such motion. See id. at 56.2(b). 

Additionally, after reviewing numerous briefs that have

previously been submitted by the parties herein, the Court has

perceived a few repeated problems. Thus, regarding any future briefs

submitted to this Court, counsel must:

(1) proofread briefs before submitting them to the Court

to correct typographical errors and ensure that words

are not missing and sentences actually make sense;

(2) include in citations the reporter or computer
database where they may be found;

(3) cite the particular subsection of a statute or page

of a case upon which the stated legal proposition can

be found; 

(4) include in response briefs only argument and authorities responsive to the particular motion at issue;

similarly, include in reply briefs argument and

authorities responsive to the response brief to the

particular motion at issue; and

(5) format response briefs similarly to the motion’s

table of contents, so that the Court can easily flip

to responsive arguments to each particular section

of the motion.

Continued failure to abide by these requirements may result in the

striking of a noncompliant motion or brief.

SIGNED February 22, 2023.

____________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Harvey Beker, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn Ridgefield
Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.


/s/ Harvey Beker
----------------
Harvey Beker
Co-Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2005
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3




COMPENSATION OF JAMES T. RYABY




     On April 15, 2005, OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) set the maximum cash bonus for Dr. James
T. Ryaby for the year ending December 31, 2005 in accordance with his employment agreement with the
Company dated June 1, 2001. The 2005 maximum cash bonus for Dr. Ryaby was set at 45% of his 2005
base annual salary, or $105,750.
# AGENCY:

Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 12, 2000. The notice announces that the Federal-State Marketing Improvement Program (FSMIP) was allocated $1,200,000 in the Federal budget for Fiscal Year 2000; however, pertinent information in the                         **SUMMARY**                         and                         **DATES**                         sections of the notice was omitted.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

FSMIP Staff, Transportation and Marketing, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 4006 South Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

                    AMS published a notice that appeared in the January 12, 2000                     **Federal Register**                     at 65 FR 1846. The notice announced that the FSMIP was allocated $1,200, 000 in the Federal budget for fiscal year 2000. Pertinent information in the                     **Summary**                     and                     **Dates**                     sections of the notice was omitted. In the                     **SUMMARY,**                     a reference to community-based organizations was omitted. In the                     **DATES**                     section, reference to a two-round consideration of proposals was not made. Accordingly, this document makes the appropriate corrections to those sections of the notice.                

## Correction

                    In FR Doc. 00-714, published on January 12, 2000, on page 1846, first column, the                     **SUMMARY**                     and                     **DATES**                     sections are corrected to read:                 

“SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal-State Marketing Improvement Program (FSMIP) was allocated $1,200,000 in the Federal budget for FY 2000. Funds remain available for this program. States interested in obtaining funds under this program are invited to submit proposals. While only State Departments of Agriculture or other appropriate State Agencies are eligible to apply for funds, State Agencies are encouraged to involve industry groups and community-based organizations in the development of proposals and the conduct of projects.” and 

“DATES: Funds will be allocated on the basis of two rounds of consideration. Proposals received by February 18, 2000 will be considered during the first round. Proposals which are not selected for funding during the first round and other proposals received by May 1, 2000 will be considered during the second round.”

Dated: February 3, 2000.

Eileen Stommes, 

Deputy Administrator, Transportation and Marketing.

[FR Doc. 00-2977  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-02-M
## The Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy

The Advisory Com m ittee on International Econom ic Policy is not subject to the Em olum ents Clause.

April 17, 1996

L e t t e r O p in io n f o r t h e D e p u t y L e g a l A d v is e r

D e p a r t m e n t o f S t a t e



### As you requested, we have reviewed the question whether members of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy (“ IEP Advisory Committee” )would occupy an “ Office of Profit or Trust” within the meaning of the Emoluments Clause, U.S. Const, art. I, §9, cl. 8. As we have advised you before, wereject the sweeping and unqualified view, expressed on one occasion by our Office, that federal advisory committee members, as such, are subject to the Emoluments Clause. See Applicability o f 18 U.S.C. §219 to Members o f Federal Advisory Committees, 

### 15 Op. O.L.C. 65, 68 (1991). The members of the IEP Advisory Committee meet only occasionally, servewithout compensation, take no oath, and do not have access to classified information; furthermore, the Committee is purely advisory, is not a creature of statute, and discharges no substantive statutory responsibilities. We therefore believe that the members of the IEP Advisory Committee do not occupy “ Office[s] of Profit or Trust” under the Emoluments Clause. We do not address the argument thatthe Office of Government Ethics’ longstanding test for determining who are Special Government Employees (“ SGEs” ) should be substantially narrowed, so that members of State Department advisory committees would generally not qualify as SGEs, nor be subject, by reason of SGE status, to the Emoluments Clause,

see 

### Letter to Walter Dellinger, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, from Conrad K. Harper, Legal Adviser, Department of State (Feb. 13, 1995).

WALTER DELLINGER Assistant Attorney General Office o f Legal Counsel



### 123
Case 2:22-cr-00096-Z-BR Document 32 Filed 11/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 79
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1384

To authorize a junior reserve officers training pilot program by the Coast

Guard.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1993

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself and Mr. SHAW) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize a junior reserve officers training pilot program

by the Coast Guard.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF JUNIOR RESERVE OFFI4 CERS TRAINING PROGRAM PILOT PROGRAM.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the department

6 in which the Coast Guard is operating (hereinafter in this

7 section referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may carry out a

8 pilot program to establish and maintain a junior reserve

9 officers training program in cooperation with Miami

10 Beach Senior High School, located in Miami Beach, Flor-
2

•HR 1384 IH

1 ida (hereinafter in this section referred to as the

2 ‘‘School’’).

3 (b) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—A pilot program

4 carried out by the Secretary under this section shall pro5 vide to students at the School—

6 (1) instruction in subject areas relating to oper7 ations of the Coast Guard; and

8 (2) training in skills which are useful and ap9 propriate for a career in the Coast Guard.

10 (c) PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT.—To carry

11 out a pilot program under this section, the Secretary may

12 provide to the School—

13 (1) assistance in course development, instruc14 tion, and other support activities;

15 (2) commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of

16 the Coast Guard to serve as administrators and in17 structors; and

18 (3) necessary and appropriate course materials,

19 equipment, and uniforms.

20 (d) EMPLOYMENT OF RETIRED COAST GUARD PER21 SONNEL.—

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2),

23 the Secretary may authorize the School to employ as

24 administrators and instructors for the pilot program

25 retired Coast Guard and Coast Guard Reserve com-
3

•HR 1384 IH

1 missioned, warrant, and petty officers who request

2 that employment and who are approved by the Sec3 retary and the School.

4 (2) AUTHORIZED PAY.—(A) Retired members

5 of the Coast Guard employed under paragraph (1)

6 are entitled to receive their retired or retainer pay

7 and an additional amount of not more than the dif8 ference between—

9 (i) the amount they would be paid as pay

10 and allowance if they were considered to have

11 been ordered to active duty during that period

12 of employment; and

13 (ii) the amount of retired pay they are en14 titled to receive during that period.

15 (B) The Secretary shall pay to the School an

amount equal to 1 16 ⁄2 the amount described in sub17 paragraph (A), from amounts appropriated for that

18 purpose.

19 (C) Notwithstanding any other law, while em20 ployed under this subsection, an individual is not

21 considered to be on active duty or inactive duty

22 training.

Æ
exv4w4



 




Exhibit 4.4



INPUT/OUTPUT, INC.




Certificate of Amendment

to

Certificate of Incorporation




     Input/Output, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify:



     First: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting held on February
15, 2005, unanimously adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following
amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation:



     Section 1 of Article Fourth of the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation shall
be amended so that, as amended, Section 1 of Article Fourth shall be and read as follows:



          “SECTION 1. CAPITALIZATION. The Corporation is authorized to issue two
hundred five million (205,000,000) shares of capital stock. Two hundred million
(200,000,000) of the authorized shares shall be common stock, one cent ($0.01) par
value each (‘Common Stock’), and five million (5,000,000) of the authorized shares
shall be preferred stock, one cent ($0.01) par value each (“Preferred Stock”).




          Each holder of shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall at every
meeting of the stockholders be entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for each
share of the capital stock of the Corporation held by the stockholder, unless
otherwise specifically provided pursuant to this Restated Certificate of
Incorporation.”




     Second: The stockholders approved said amendment at a meeting held on May 4, 2005.



     Third: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



     In Witness Whereof, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed this 4th
day of May, 2005.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	INPUT/OUTPUT, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ David L. Roland
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	David L. Roland 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President and General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,528
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,028
<PP&E>                                       2,276,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,266,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,348,867
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,218
<OTHER-SE>                                   (116,489)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,266,801
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (312,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (312,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (312,241)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting**

**April 12, 2013**

# U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs

**810 Seventh Street NW, 3rd Floor Conference Center, Washington, DC 20531**

**10:00–10:15 a.m.	Welcome, Opening Remarks, and Introductions**

*Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)*

*Chair, Coordinating Council*

*Tony West, Acting Associate Attorney General, DOJ*

*Robert Listenbee, Jr., Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 		Prevention (OJJDP), DOJ, Vice Chair, Coordinating Council*

**10:15–11:30 a.m.	Council Member Discussion:  Implementing Recommendations of the Attorney General’s Task Force on Children Exposed to Violence**

*Moderator:  OJJDP Administrator Robert Listenbee, Jr., Vice Chair*

*U.S. Department of Health and Human Services*

*Additional Agency Briefings/Comments*

*Practitioner Comments*

**11:30–11:40  a.m.	Agency Announcements**

****

**U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)**

*Maurice Jones, Deputy Secretary, HUD*

**

*Additional Announcements*

**11:40****–11:45 a.m.	Summary and Meeting Adjournment**

*Tony West, Acting Associate Attorney General, DOJ*

# image1.jpeg