alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      RULE 13A - 14(B) CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                                FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officers of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Corporation") hereby certify that the Corporation's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 30, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


                                      Dated: June 9, 2006

                                      /s/ S. LESLIE FLEGEL
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Name:  S. Leslie Flegel
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ MARC FIERMAN
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Marc Fierman
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 21 47

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e
v. Ch ris to ph er Pe ck ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe llan t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i - Sp rin gf ie ld

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 28 , 20 17 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

9, 2 01 8 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, LOKEN , andCOLLOTON, Cir cu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
In th is di rect cri mi na l ap pe al , Ch ris to ph er Peck ch al le ng es th e se nt en ce th e di st ric t co urt im

po se d fo ll owi ng hi s gu il ty p le a to ch il d po rn og rap hy char ge s. His 1
The Hon or ab le M. Dou gl as Harp oo l, Uni te d St at e s D i s t ric t Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i.co un se l ha s m ov ed to withd raw an d subm it te d a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6

U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , di sc us si ng th e rea so nabl en es s o f th e se nt en ce. W e co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co urt di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n, as itpro pe rly co ns id ered th e 18 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a) fact or s; th ere was no in di cat io n th at it ov erl oo ke d a rel ev an t fact or , or co m

m it te d a cl ear erro r ofjud gm en t in weig hi ng rel ev an t fact or s, se e Uni te d St at es v. Dav id , 68 2 F.3 d 10 74 , 10 77 (8 th Ci r. 20 12 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w); Uni te d St at es v. W oh lm an , 65 1 F.3 d 87 8, 88 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ); an d th e se nt en ce was withi n th e Gui de li ne s ran ge , s ee Uni te d St at es v. Ca ll away, 76 2 F .3d75 4, 7 60 (8 th Ci r. 20 14 ). Fu rth erm or e, we ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Oh io , 48 8 U.S. 7 5 (1 98 8) , andha ve fou ndno no n- fri vo lo us is su es forap pe al

. Acco rd in gl y , we gra ntco un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw, an d a ffi rm .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. RP00-327-000 and RP00-326-000]

On June 15, 2000, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia Gas) and Columbia Gulf Transmission Company (Columbia Gulf) submitted filings to comply with Order No. 637. Several parties have protested various aspects of Columbia Gas' filing and Columbia Gulf's filing.

Take notice that a technical conference to discuss the various issues raised by Columbia Gulf's filing will commence on Wednesday, December 13, 2000, at 10:00 am.

Also take notice that a technical conference to discuss the various issues raised by Columbia Gas's filing will commence on Thursday, December 14, 2000, at 9:00 am.

The technical conferences will be held in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Parties protesting aspects of Columbia Gas' filing and Columbia Gulf's filing should be prepared to discuss alternatives.

All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30354 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 22, 2016

CONTACT: Rob Friedlander, Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22

WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. Lew today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in an executive session at the Treasury 

Department. 

During the meeting, the Council discussed its ongoing assessment of potential risks to U.S. 

financial stability from asset management products and activities, following the Council’s public 

update on this topic in April. Staff provided a progress update regarding the ongoing work of the 

Council’s hedge fund working group since the Council’s previous meeting. 

In addition, the Office of Financial Research presented on a potential proposal to establish a 

permanent collection of bilateral repurchase agreement data. The Council’s annual reports have 

previously identified data gaps in the repurchase agreement market as a concern. 

The Council also received an update from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on the 

most recent review of the Shared National Credit Program, which assesses credit risk and trends 

as well as risk management practices associated with the largest and most complex credits. 

The Council also received an update from the Federal Reserve, Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

regarding recent developments related to standards for the resiliency, recovery, and resolution of 

central counterparties.

In addition, the Council received a presentation on and voted to approve its fiscal year 2017 

budget, and also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on July 18.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved budget and 

meeting minutes are available at http://www.fsoc.gov. 
###
Appendix B Ozone Sensitivity in Atlanta in Relation to the SEMAP Sensitivity Study

1 Data File Included in Electronic Copy Only
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0403

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM HOMER MCCLELLAN,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 7, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 1 2023

05/01/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0403
Exhibit 32.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Juliano, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ MARK JULIANO                                                    
|                  |  |  |  | Mark Juliano                                                        
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.
#### In the Matter of Fred Mabery, Petitioner, v Thomas Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The misbehavior report was written by the correction officer who conducted the search of petitioner’s coat which revealed the weapon at issue. Furthermore, the report was corroborated by a photograph of the weapon and the testimony of two additional eyewitnesses to the incident *(see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre,*150 AD2d 954, *lv denied*74 NY2d 615). Petitioner’s claim that the weapon was not his and was placed in his coat by someone else merely presented a question of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see, supra).*The weapon was also found in an area within petitioner’s control even though his access may not have been exclusive; accordingly, the determination of guilt on the weapons charge was supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Caldwell v Coughlin,*148 AD2d 905). Petitioner’s remaining claims have been considered and found to be without merit.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### Norman TURNER v. STATE.

No. 21225.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 26, 1940.

Louis Crump, of Coleman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for theft of an automobile, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not longer desire to prosecute his appeal.

At appellant’s request the appeal is dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Medina, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered April 26, 1989, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree.

The only issue raised by defendant on this appeal concerns the legality of the warrantless search conducted by State Troopers after the vehicle in which defendant was a passenger was stopped for speeding. This court recently dealt with this same issue in the case of codefendant Thomas Mercado *(see, People v Mercado,*165 AD2d 910), wherein we decided that probable cause validating the search was lacking. Since this issue is determinative of defendant’s appeal, reversal of his conviction is also warranted.

Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress granted and matter remitted to the County Court of Ulster County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Mercure, JJ., concur.
# Q
US.D«partnwn t o f - , , , 120 0 Ne w jerse y Avenue , SE •^onipOrtClMo n • V 1. 1 - ^ ^ - L ; i Wa*hington , D C 2059 0 Of f ic e O f m e Secfe*or

y crflhansportofto n Novembe r 4 , 201 1 Mr
. Geral dF
. Murph

y Crowell & Morin g LLP 100 1 Pennsylvani aAvenue , N W Washington , DC 20004-259 5
Re : Docke

t DOT-OST-2009-011 6 Applicatio n o f

Ke y Lime Ai r

Corporatio n fo r Sectio n 4173 8 Commuter Air Carrier Authorizatio n Dea r Mr
. Murphy : Thi s lette r follow s ou r

telephon e conversatio n o f Octobe r 4 , 2011 , concernin g th e applicatio n o f Ke y Lim e Air Corporatio n ("Key Lime")

- A s 1 note d i n ou r discussion , o n March 21 , 2011 , w e receive dth e additional informatio n tha t yo u submitte d t o th e Department vi ae-mail ; however , tha t informatio n ha s no t

been place d i

n th e publi c docke

t (Docket DOT-OST-2009-0116)
. Until tha t informatio n i s submitte di n th e docket , w e ar

e not abl e to conside r

i t i n ou r evaluatio n o f

th e pendin g application
. Thus , Ke y Lime' s applicatio n remain s substantiall y incomplete
. W e direc t Ke y Lim e t o file th e update dfitness informatio n i n th e docket , withi n 3 0 day s o f thi s letter , o

r b y Decembe r 5 , 2011
. Shoul dKey Lim e not submit th e additional informatio n b y thi s date , w e intendto dismis s Key Lime' s applicatio n fo r failur e to prosecute it s application
. Than k yo u fo r you r cooperatio n i n thi s matter . I f yo u hav e an y question s regardin g thi s letter , pleas e fee l fi^e t o contac t

Vaness aBalgobi n o f

m y staf f a t 202-366-9721
. Sincerely , Lauialy n J , Rem

o Chief , Ai r Carrier Fitnes s Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi scc : Docke t DOT-OST-2009-011 6 Clif f Honeycut t Presiden t Ke y Lime Ai r

Coiporatio n 1325 2 E
. Contro l Tower

Roa d Englewood , C O 8011 2 Christophe

r Lan g PO l fo r Ke y Lim e Ai r

Corporatio n FA A Denve r FSDO-0 3 2680 5 Eas t

68t h Ave
. Denver , C O 8024 9
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 24, 2020

a1116 

# Order

Clerk November 24, 2020

160805(48)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160805

COA: 343961

Tuscola CC: 17

- 014300

- FH

LANA LEE KENNEDY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 8,

2020 order is considered, and it is DEN IED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
Case 3:22-cr-00377-M Document 70 Filed 11/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 209
#### BLACKBURN v. STATE.

No. 20836.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1940.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal March 20, 1940.

L. W. .Sampson and S. K. Sampson, both of Decatur, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the pur-ppse of sale in a dry area; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for fifty days.

The record fails to show that notice .of appeal was given and entered upon the minutes of the trial court. In the ábsence of such a showing, this court is without jurisdiction to determine the matters presented for review. Art. 827, C.C.P. See Curbow v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 132 S.W.2d 853, and cases there cited. -

'The appeal is dismissed.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

KRUEGER, Judge.

At a former day of- this term we iismissed 'the appeal in this case because the record failed to show that notice of’ appeal was given, and entered upon the minutes of the trial court. Since then the record has been perfected in this respect and we will now consider and dispose of the case on its merits. The only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain ‘appellant’s conviction.

The state’s .testimony .shows that the officers drove- up to. appellant’s home and called’ for him. -He invited- them -intp the ’house. They told hirp -their, .purpose in being there. Th ey'.did not- tell; him they had any search warrant. He told them to go ahead and search; - that they did- not need a search warrant. They found 10 *107half-pints of whisky in the barn and two empty whisky cases in the house which had the same brand marked thereon as the whisky which they found in the barn. The state also offered in evidence the minutes of the Commissioners Court showing that local option was in full force and effect in Wise County. Appellant did not testify or offer any affirmative defense. We deem the evidence sufficient, to sustain his conviction. In his brief, appellant complains of the introduction of the whisky found as a result of the search, but no oN jection seems to have been interposed to its introduction in evidence. Appellant in his brief also speaks of certain bills of exceptions, but none appear in the transcript. Hence these matters,’ although discussed in his brief; cannot be considered in .the áb-sence of proper bills of exceptions;

No error of a reversible nature appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. • ■ .

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of.Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                         0000943323
<NAME>                        TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS FUNDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,007
<BONDS>                                        155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,007
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
<F1>  Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other.
<F2>  Includes general & administration and depreciation & amortization.

</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 308 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 308

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on any legislative 
day from Thursday, July 29, 2010, through Tuesday, August 3, 2010, on a 
motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority 
Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned

              

 until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, September 14, 2010, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as she may designate if, in her 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 308

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

        Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
                            Representatives.
```