alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from form 10Q and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         13,594
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                   5,246
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,575
<PP&E>                                         239,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,920
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       72
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   396,957
<SALES>                                        392,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,416
<CGS>                                          215,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  375,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10,357
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,455
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,444
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,444
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .07


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1209

To limit purchases of district office equipment and furnishings by a departing

Member to items not needed for official use by the successor to the

departing Member.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1993

Ms. SHEPHERD (for herself, Mr. FINGERHUT, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin,

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. KREIDLER, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr.

MINGE, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BONILLA, Ms. HARMAN, and Mr. COPPERSMITH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Administration

A BILL

To limit purchases of district office equipment and furnishings by a departing Member to items not needed for

official use by the successor to the departing Member.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That subsection (b) of the first section of the Act entitled

4 ‘‘An Act to authorize the disposition of certain office

5 equipment and furnishings, and for other purposes’’ (2

6 U.S.C. 59a(b)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of para8 graph (1);
2

•HR 1209 IH

1 (2) by striking out the period at the end of

2 paragraph (2) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

3 and

4 (3) by adding at the end the following new

5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(3) subject to the right of the successor to the

7 Member who is leaving office or otherwise ceasing to

8 be a Member to retain the equipment or furnishings

9 for official use.’’.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C28

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

  

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Source Interlink Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, S.
Leslie Flegel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements section 31(a) or 15(d) of
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       S. Leslie Flegel
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                       December 18, 2002


31
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1297 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1297

       To reduce the rates of basic pay for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1993

  Mr. Peterson of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was 
referred jointly to the Committees on Post Office and Civil Service and 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reduce the rates of basic pay for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY.

    This Act applies with respect to each position under subparagraph 
(A), (B), or (C) of section 601(a)(1) of the Legislative Reorganization 
Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(1)).

SEC. 2. PAY REDUCTION FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Immediate Reduction.--Effective as of the beginning of the 
first applicable pay period beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the rate of basic pay for each position to which 
this Act applies shall be reduced by--
            (1) the amount by which the rate of basic pay for such 
        position was increased under section 601(a)(2) of the 
        Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 in calendar year 1993; 
        and
            (2) an additional amount such that the total reduction 
        under this subsection is 5 percent.
    (b) Subsequent Adjustment.--
            (1) Partial restoration.--Effective as of the beginning of 
        the first applicable pay period beginning on or after January 
        1, 1994, the rate of basic pay for each position to which this 
        Act applies shall be increased by an amount equal to the amount 
        by which the rate of basic pay for such position was reduced 
        under subsection (a)(1).
            (2) Coordination rule.--If a pay adjustment under paragraph 
        (1) is to take effect on the same date as any other pay 
        adjustment with respect to the same position, the adjustment 
        under paragraph (1) shall be made first.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10QSB for quarterly period
ended March 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                      1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                       36,737
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             45,529
<PP&E>                                      167,586
<DEPRECIATION>                              (56,395)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              541,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       603,883
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                  2,225,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               (3,932,354)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                541,184
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             19,175
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            266,981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           37,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (285,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (285,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (285,365)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0







</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended September 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           22335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    25959
<ALLOWANCES>                                       217
<INVENTORY>                                      18478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 68459
<PP&E>                                           33682
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   80715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            25204
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                       55216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     80715
<SALES>                                          29009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 30567
<CGS>                                            13092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3918
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3350
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *947Thomas Cheek, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of defendant’s contentions requires reversal. Although at times the prosecutor’s summation exceeded fair comment, it was not so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial, particularly since the court sustained several of defense counsel’s objections and gave curative instructions *(see, People v Mohammed,*151 AD2d 1018, 1019, *lv denied*74 NY2d 815). Defendant has failed to preserve his contention regarding the court’s charge on reasonable doubt and, in any event, when viewed in its entirety, the charge conveyed to the jury the proper legal principles regarding the burden of proof *(see, People v Luis,*145 AD2d 960, 961, *lv denied*73 NY2d 923). Although the court erred in admitting a tape of the victim’s telephone call to the police describing the incident that led to his death *(see, People v Wilson,*123 AD2d 457, *lv denied*70 NY2d 659), the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—manslaughter, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1378

To amend title 10, United States Code, with respect to applicability of

qualification requirements for certain acquisition positions in the Department of Defense.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1993

Mr. SISISKY (for himself and Mr. HANSEN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, with respect to

applicability of qualification requirements for certain acquisition positions in the Department of Defense.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF QUALIFICATION REQUIRE4 MENTS FOR CERTAIN ACQUISITION POSI5 TIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

6 Section 1724(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code,

7 is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘or lower’’ before ‘‘grade’’; and

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘or lower’’ before ‘‘level’’.
2

•HR 1378 IH

Æ
Case 3:22-cv-01970-S-BT Document 7 Filed 10/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 302.1701*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8059.                

*Date Filed:*                     October 4, 2000.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     October 25, 2000.                

*Description:*                     Application of Mountain Bird Inc. d/b/a Salmon Air pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41738 and Subpart Q, requests authority to operate scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8074.                

*Date Filed:*                     October 5, 2000.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     October 26, 2000.                

*Description:*                     Application of Euroatlantic Airways-Transportes Aereos, S.A. (“Euroatlantic”) pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41301 and Subpart Q, requests a foreign air carrier permit authorizing it to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between points in Portugal and points in the United States and between points in the United States and points in third countries.                 

Dorothy Y. Beard,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 00-29239 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Molecular Target Discovery for Cancer.
    Date: November 28-29, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Joyce C. Pegues, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review, Referral, and Resources, Branch, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8084, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/594-1286.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395; Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 17, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30460 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### SOUTHERN UNDERWRITERS v. ELLIS-SMITH & CO.

No. 12901.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

July 6, 1940.

Will R. Saunders, of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.

Kennemer & Armstrong, of Dallas, for defendant in error.

LOONEY, Justice.

Ellis-Smith & Company, a partnership, sued W. T. Pinkston and wife, Mrs. R. L. Pinkston, in an action of debt, and applied for the issuance of a writ of garnishment against “Southern Underwriters”, alleged to be indebted to the defendants, and a resident of Harris County, Texas. The *736application for garnishment failed to disclose whether Southern Underwriters was a corporation, a partnership, or an individual operating under that name; nor did it disclose the name of any person upon whom service of the writ could be had.

On April 18, 1938, Ellis-Smith & Company obtained judgment in the main suit against the Pinkstons, for the full amount sued for, and on October 25, 1938, took judgment by default against Southern Underwriters for the amount of the judgment against the Pinkstons, from which, in due time, Southern Underwriters perfected this appeal by writ of error.

Plaintiff in error urges a number of grounds for reversal, several of which, in our judgment, are well taken, but only one will be discussed, because we think it indisputably appears that, the court was without jurisdiction to render the judgment.

Although the judgment entry recites that, “ * * * the garnishee, Southern Underwriters, came not, though it appeared to the court that it had been duly and timely served and cited to appear and answer herein, but has wholly defaulted”, etc., yet the record contains no writ and, consequently, no return of the officer showing service, and the only evidence found in the record tending to show that a writ was ever issued or served is, an affidavit (bearing no file mark) by a deputy sheriff of Harris County, dated September 22, 1938, to the effect that, on August 4, 1936, two writs of garnishment, issued in cause No. 23,594-A, were turned over to the affiant and were served on same date. No other description of the writ was given, nor does the affidavit state how, or upon whom, service was had. Affiant also stated that the return, giving the name of the individual upon whom service was obtained and the date of service, was mailed to the attorneys, at Dallas, who represented plaintiff in the original suit.

We do not think the affidavit of the deputy sheriff can be considered as part of the record, for any purpose. The statute (Art. 2289, R.C.S.) furnishes ample procedure for the substitution of lost papers, but was not pursued in the instant case. As the record fails to show that a writ of garnishment was ever issued against, or served upon plaintiff in error, it is apparent that, the court was without jurisdiction to render the judgment; therefore, it is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.