alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1084 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a standard 

to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes than 

the program material they accompany. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2009 

Ms. ESHOO (for herself, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. 

SUTTON, Mr. SIRES, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

BISHOP of New York, Ms. WATSON, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN

of California, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. HARE, 

Mr. HONDA, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

DICKS, Mr. CROWLEY, Ms. LEE of California, and Ms. LORETTA

SANCHEZ of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a standard to preclude commercials from being 

broadcast at louder volumes than the program material 

they accompany. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Advertise5 ment Loudness Mitigation Act’’. 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1084 IH

1 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING ON LOUD COMMERCIALS REQUIRED. 

2 (a) REGULATION REQUIRED.—Within one year after 

3 the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Commu4 nications Commission shall prescribe pursuant to the 

5 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) a 

6 regulation that provides, in connection with any video pro7 gramming that is broadcast or that is distributed by any 

8 multichannel video programming distributor, that— 

9 (1) advertisements accompanying such video 

10 programming shall not be excessively noisy or stri11 dent; 

12 (2) such advertisements shall not be presented 

13 at modulation levels substantially higher than the 

14 program material that such advertisements accom15 pany; and 

16 (3) the average maximum loudness of such ad17 vertisements shall not be substantially higher than 

18 the average maximum loudness of the program ma19 terial that such advertisements accompany. 

20 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the 

21 terms ‘‘video programming’’ and ‘‘multichannel video pro22 gramming distributor’’ have the meanings given such 

23 terms in section 602 of Communications Act of 1934 (47 

24 U.S.C. 522). 

Æ 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

265) IV-C-11 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:04 AM Sheet 265 of 276 
P.2 

'•._ *0»*« » '''••• 

V 

• it*B

*-*v,. 

lay 

A"°.O"O(0 

iv-c-U 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C 20460 

NOV 25 1991 

Mr. Allan B. Hubbard 

Executive Director 

President's Council on Competitiveness 

Old Executive Office Building - Room 200 

17th and Pennsylvania Avenue 

Washington, D.C. 20501 

OFFICE OF 

Alft ANO RADIATION 

Dear Hr . kuW&rd: 

I! 6 

R.r~" 

1 1 1 DEC 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

8 1991 

in our meeting of November 13, I agreed to circulate for 

interagency review a draft final Wisconsin Electric Power company 

(WEPCO) rule by December 3. The Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) remains committed to finalizing the WEPCO rule as soon as 

possible. However, my lawyers have advised me that issuing a 

final rule without reopening the comment period would not be 

compatible with procedural requirements of the Clean Air Act and 

would place the final rule in great danger of being struck down 

by the courts. As you know, this issue stems from our pledge to 

reopen the comment period following issuance of the transcript of 

the Waxman oversight hearings on WEPCO on July 22. With this 

revision to the schedule, EPA now plans to, within 5 weeks of the 

close of the supplemental comment period, prepare a draft final 

rule and submit it for interagency review. This will be 

approximately January 17, 1992 (see enclosed schedule). 

The period between the close of the comment period and the 

submittal of the final rule to OMB is required to develop 

responses to comments received during the supplemental comment 

period, draft the final rule, and accommodate the work schedules 

of key staff. Any shorter time period would invite criticism 

that we did not adequately consider any new comments received. 

Although this is an extremely tight schedule, we should be able 

to meet it unless we receive substantial new industry comments 

during the reopened comment period. 

I trust that the foregoing represents a suitable resolution 

of the timing problems with this regulation. 

ely, 

William G. Rosenberg 

Assistant Administrator 

for Air and Radiation 

Enclosure (1) 

Pirttd on Htc/ded Piper 
.. A^v 

* 

P.3 

WEPCO FINAL RULEMAKING SCHEDULE 

Reopen public comment period 

Comment period ends 

Draft completed for concurrent 

interagency/Red Border review 

OMB completes review 

DATE 

11/20/91 

12/10/91 

01/17/92 

02/17/92 
niw*i*UHur*5 

: * <;^J 

x ••• -

ILL' __U_.-__D__-U^4D1 NOV __b.yi iy:^b N0.UU4 K.U4 

P.4 

4 bcc: L. Wegman 

G. Foote 

B. Tyndall 

J. Beale 

R. Brenner 

J. Calcagni 

K. Berry 

E. Lillis 

G. McCutchen 

L. Elmore 

D. Solomon 

Sect, file
#### GARRETT v. STATE.

No. 21292.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is 'for murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/17/2013

Sample Number: 134053-001 Date Collected: 10/02/2013 Date Received: 10/4/2013

Trip Blank 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg < 0.20 ng/L U 0.50 0.20 JAB 10/14/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 134053-002 Date Collected: 10/02/2013 Date Received: 10/4/2013

Field Blank 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg < 0.20 ng/L U 0.50 0.20 JAB 10/14/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 134053-003 Date Collected: 10/02/2013 Date Received: 10/4/2013

Plant Outfall #001 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 4.6 ng/L 2.0 0.80 JAB 10/14/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 134053-004 Date Collected: 10/02/2013 Date Received: 10/4/2013

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 2.0 ng/L 1.0 0.40 JAB 10/14/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 134053-005 Date Collected: 10/02/2013 Date Received: 10/4/2013

CPS Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 347 ng/L 20 8.0 JAB 10/14/2013 EPA 1631E

Mountaineer Plant, 134053 Page 1 of 2
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/17/2013

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 134053 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     441
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     605
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                6,609
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     27,685
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       27,555
<LOANS>                                    49,320
<ALLOWANCE>                                380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             88,089
<DEPOSITS>                                 54,751
<SHORT-TERM>                               0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        859
<LONG-TERM>                                17,768
<COMMON>                                   14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                 14,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             88,089
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            1,024
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          561
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           25
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           1,610
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         612
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         871
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      739
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              8
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            391
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 267
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.41
<LOANS-NON>                                34
<LOANS-PAST>                               49
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           372
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              0
<RECOVERIES>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          380
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    380
        

</TABLE>
#### WATERS v. STATE.

No. 25530.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Texas, George P. Blackburn, State’s' Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, seven years.

There being no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - 50 CFR Part 635
          - [I.D. 110800C]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Postponement of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

NMFS announces the postponement of the technical gear workshop previously scheduled to discuss potential gear modifications and configurations for the Atlantic pelagic longline fishery.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margo Schulze-Haugen or Tyson Kade at (301) 713-2347.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On November 21, 2000 (65 FR 69898), NMFS announced that it would conduct a workshop on December 12-13, 2000, at NMFS, Building 4 - Science Center, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.  The purpose of the workshop is to allow fishermen, gear experts, sea turtle experts, and fishery managers to discuss possible measures, including gear and fishing method modifications, to reduce the incidental take and mortality of sea turtles in the Atlantic pelagic longline fishery.  After announcing the workshop, NMFS received comment from fishermen that the scheduled dates posed a conflict with the active fishing period associated with the full moon.  As participation by fishing vessel captains is an important aspect of this meeting, NMFS has agreed to reschedule the workshop.  NMFS will announce a future date for this workshop in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Authority:16 U.S.C. 971*et seq.*, and 16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: November 22, 2000.

Bruce C. Morehead,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 00-30418 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 374 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.374

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  Designating August 2, 1994, as ``National Neighborhood Crime Watch 
Day''.

Whereas neighborhood crime is of continuing concern to the American 
  people;
Whereas the fight against neighborhood crime requires people to work 
  together in cooperation with law enforcement officials;
Whereas neighborhood crime watch organizations are effective at 
  promoting awareness about, and the participation of volunteers in, 
  crime prevention activities at the local level;
Whereas neighborhood crime watch groups can contribute to the Nation's 
  war on drugs by helping to prevent their communities from becoming 
  markets for drug dealers; and
Whereas citizens across America will soon take part in a ``National 
  Night Out'', a unique crime prevention event which will demonstrate 
  the importance and effectiveness of community participation in crime 
  prevention efforts by having people spend the period from 9 to 10 
  o'clock postmeridian on August 2, 1994, with their neighbors in front 
  of their homes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That August 2, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Neighborhood Crime Watch Day'', and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe such day with 
appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PACE Health Management Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John Pappajohn, Director and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




                                            /s/ John Pappajohn
                                            -------------------------------
                                            John Pappajohn
                                            Director and Acting CFO
                                            November 12, 2003


                                       13
#### In the Matter of Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Petitioner, v Public Employment Relations Board of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

On the court’s own motion, it is,

*617Ordered that the decision and judgment of this court in the above-entitled case, dated October 15, 1990 [166 AD2d 587], is amended, by adding to the decretal paragraph thereof, after the words "on the merits,” the words "the counterclaim of the respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board for enforcement of the determination is granted and the petitioner is directed to comply with the determination dated November 2, 1988,”. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-267-Y 

 § 

AMBERLY HASTINGS (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 30, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00016

- CR

IN RE JAMES J. ZARYC HTA, JR.

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Rey na, and

Justice Davis

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 2 4 , 2010

Do not publish

[OT06]
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 10450 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Rafael Ramos,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20 - CR - 185 - 21

**_______________________ _______**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Rafael Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ramos ’s response .

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 30, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10450 Document: 00516984591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2023No. 23 - 10450

2 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R**  **.** 42.2. Case: 23-10450 Document: 00516984591 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/30/2023
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Lynch, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/                     | James F. Lynch |   |
|-------------------------|----------------|--------|
| **James  F. Lynch**     |           |
| Chief Executive Officer |           |

 

September 13,2006

----
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
June 24, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement)
during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019