alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

                 SUMMARY OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



I.  Board Members (Other than the Chairman)
    ---------------------------------------

A.  Annual Cash Compensation

    Annual Cash Retainer:                                     $35,000

    Annual Presiding Director Retainer:                       $ 3,000

    Additional Cash Retainer for Members of
    Audit Committee:                                          $20,000 (Chairman)
                                                              $ 5,000 (Other)

    Additional Cash Retainer for Members of Compensation      $ 5,000 (Chairman)
    Committee:                                                $ 3,000 (Other)

    Additional Cash Retainer for Members of Nominating and    $ 5,000 (Chairman)
    Corporate Governance Committee:                           $ 3,000 (Other)

    Additional Cash Retainer for Members of Strategy
    Committee:                                                $ 5,000 (Chairman)
                                                              $ 3,000 (Other)

B.  Meeting Fees

    Board Meeting Fees:      $1,500 per meeting  attended in person  ($2,500
                             for  directors  resident on the west coast)

    Committee Meeting Fees:  $1,500 per meeting attended in person, on a day
                             other than a day on which the board meets

                             $1,000 per meeting attended in person, on the same
                             day as a board meeting

    Telephone Meeting Fees:  $750 per board or committee meeting attended by
                             conference telephone

    Directors are also reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred
    in attending meetings.

C.  Stock Options

    Upon appointment as a director, the director is granted an option to
    purchase 15,000 shares, vesting 1/3 on each of the first three anniversaries
    of the grant date, expiring seven years from the grant date.

    Annual grant of options for 7,500 shares, vesting 1/3 on each of the first
    three anniversaries of the grant date, expiring seven years from the grant
    date.

II. Chairman of the Board
    ---------------------

A.  Annual Cash Compensation

    Annual Cash Compensation (in lieu of annual retainer
    and meeting fees):                                        $250,000

B.  Stock Options/Restricted Stock

    In connection with Mr. Manzi's appointment as Chairman of the Board (in
    December 2003) he was granted (a) options to purchase 240,000 shares of the
    common stock, vesting 1/3 on each of the first three anniversaries of the
    grant date, assuming continued service as Chairman of the Board, expiring
    seven years from the grant date and (b) 15,000 shares of restricted common
    stock, vesting 1/3 on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant
    date, assuming continued service as Chairman of the Board. In February 2005,
    Mr. Manzi was granted 2,500 shares of common stock.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6763

ANTHONY TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge.

(CA-95-967-N)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Angelone,

No. CA-95-967-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We also deny Appellant's

motion for bail pending appeal and his motion for a certificate of

probable cause. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### **Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Phoenix Gold International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith A.Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Keith A.  Peterson   |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Keith A.  Peterson       |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | August 14,  2002         |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# DATE AND TIME:

November 14, 2000, 1:15 p.m.-4:45 p.m.; November 15, 2000, 8 a.m.-2 p.m.

# PLACE:

Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20237.

# CLOSED MEETING:

The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting.  They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field.  This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or John Lindburg at (202) 401-3736.

Dated: November 2, 2000.

Carol Booker,

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 00-30569  Filed 11-27-00; 3:53 pm]

BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1345 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1345

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 5 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Received, read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 280 South First Street in 
    San Jose, California, as the ``Robert F. Peckham United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 280 South First Street in San Jose, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert F. Peckham 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert F. Peckham 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-398-X

§

ANTONY PAZ TORRES (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, 

the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by 

the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and ANTHONY PAZ TORRES (1) is hereby 

adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 249(a)(2) – Hate Crime Involving Attempt to Kill and and 18 U.S.C. 924(c), 

(j)(1) – Use of a Firearm to Commit Murder During a Crime of Violence. Sentence will be imposed in accordance 

with the Court's scheduling order.

⌧ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if 

released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set 

the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 

3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of 

whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the 

defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the United States 

Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 2nd day of October, 2023.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00398-X Document 40 Filed 10/02/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 92
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas H. Reslewic, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



         November 10, 2004                         /s/ Thomas H. Reslewic
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Thomas H. Reslewic
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          38,783
<SECURITIES>                                    26,492
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                       216
<INVENTORY>                                        853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,473
<PP&E>                                           2,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,658
<BONDS>                                            767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,902
<SALES>                                          7,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,156
<CGS>                                            2,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 LTC Rose Lopez Keravuori Published in Small Wars Journal
 LTC Rose Lopez Keravuori, US Army Reserve,  currently a student of Advanced Joint Professional Military Education (AJPME) published “The Battle of Waterloo on its 200th Anniversary: Relevant Lessons on fighting with a Multinational Coalition” in Small Wars Journal, July 2, 2015. The article can be found at the link below. http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-battle-of-waterloo-on-its-200th-anniversary-relevant-lessons-on-fighting-with-a-multina
 SHARE
 PRINT
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### McQUEEN v. STATE.

No. 19521.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 9, 1938.

State’s Rehearing Granted April 20, 1938.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1938.

Eugene F. Mathis, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, a fine of $300.

No complaint appears anywhere in the record before this court. Hence no juris*80diction is shown in the county court. See article 415, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P.; and Olivares v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 316, 76 S.W.2d 140.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the .Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

This cause has heretofore been reversed and dismissed because of the fact that no complaint appeáred in the record brought before us.

By motion duly filed by the State’s attorney, it is made to appear that the failure to embody such complaint in the record was an inadvertence upon the part of the county clerk, and, a certified copy of such complaint having been furnished us in a supplemental transcript, showing its filing at the proper time, the order dismissing such prosecution is set aside, and we will proceed to consider such case upon its merits.

The appellant filed a motion to quash the complaint and information, alleging that they failed to charge an offense against the laws of this State. We have examined them and they appear to be in line with the decisions of this court, and are such as we have uniformly upheld.

The statement of facts is short and shows, in substance, that upon a search of appellant’s premises in Runnels county, in July, 1937, officers found 48 twelve-ounce cans of beer, said beer containing alcohol in excess of one-half of 1 per cent by-volume, and that such county was a “dry area” at such time.

The charge seems to be correct and the proof sufficient.

This cause is therefore affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant insists that the court erred in holding the complaint and information sufficient to charge the offense. An examination thereof convinces us that the case was properly disposed of in our orjginal opinion. The statement*of facts is adequate to support the conviction.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# AGENCY:

 Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

 Notice of receipt of application. 

                    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531,                     *et seq.*).                 

## Permit Number TE022454-0 

*Applicant:*                    The Nature Conservancy, Michigan Chapter, East Lansing, Michigan; Helen Taylor, State Director                     Start Printed Page 6392

                    The applicant requests a permit for the purpose of determining management strategies for the Karner blue butterfly (                    *Lycaeides melissa samuelis*) in southwestern Newaygo County, Michigan. The applicant proposes to complete the following activities which may take the Karner blue butterfly: (1) Control and eliminate invasive alien plants, particularly spotted knapweed (                    *Centaurea maculosa*), by the initiation of a proposed burn regime, hand-pulling and spot-burning, (2) research and monitoring of the species to determine the impacts of the management regime described above, and (3) to expand and restore suitable habitat for occupation by the species. Take (kill, harass) is expected to occur in association with proposed activities. Activities are proposed for the enhancement of survival of the species in the wild.                 

Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056, and must be received within 30 days of the date of this publication. 

Documents and other information submitted with this application are available for review by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056. Telephone: (612/713-5350); FAX: (612/713-5292). 

Dated: February 3, 2000. 

Charles M. Wooley, 

Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 

[FR Doc. 00-2986 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P