alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000943322
<NAME> TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS HOLDINGS L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         150,163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,344
<INVENTORY>                                     12,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,571
<PP&E>                                       2,296,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                 449,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,293,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,707
<BONDS>                                      1,762,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,293,495
<SALES>                                        316,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,907
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,453 <F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,702 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,435
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,123)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes gaming,lodging,food & beverage and other
<F2>Includes general & administration, depreciation & amortization, and
    Trump World's Fair closing costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24
- 0243 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: MICHELLE SORENSEN,

Petitioner and Appellee,
v. ERIC SORENSEN,

Respondent and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **William Michael Gilbert,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App. P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this May 6, 2024.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Eric Sorensen, Samantha A Howard, William Michael Gilbert 05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0243
# Official Journal C 219I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 219I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 649 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 219I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 649 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 219 I/01 | Commission Decision of 7 June 2021 repealing Decision 2009/17/EC | 1 |
| 2021/C 219 I/02 | Commission Implementing Decision of 3 June 2021 establishing a list of geographical indications protected under Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council to be filed as applications for international registration pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 3 |
| 2021/C 219 I/03 | List of members of the primary dealer network | 7 |
| 2021/C 219 I/04 | Commission Implementing Decision of 8 June 2021 establishing a list of geographical indications protected under Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council to be filed as applications for international registration pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 9 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 219 I/01

Commission Decision of 7 June 2021 repealing Decision 2009/17/EC

1

2021/C 219 I/02

Commission Implementing Decision of 3 June 2021 establishing a list of geographical indications protected under Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council to be filed as applications for international registration pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council

3

2021/C 219 I/03

List of members of the primary dealer network

7

2021/C 219 I/04

Commission Implementing Decision of 8 June 2021 establishing a list of geographical indications protected under Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council to be filed as applications for international registration pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council

9

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO NOTE 
 This
Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Specialized Equipment Export Facility Master Revolving Note (“Amendment”), is made, delivered, and effective as of September 28, 2015 (the “Effective Date”)
by and between MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC, an Alberta corporation (“Borrower”) and Comerica Bank, a Texas banking association and authorized foreign bank under the Bank Act (Canada) (“Bank”) in order to
amend the US$3,000,000 Second Amended and Restated Specialized Equipment Export Facility Master Revolving Note (Multi-Currency) dated November 13, 2013, made by Borrower to Bank as amended (as amended, the “Note”). 

For valuable consideration, Borrower and Bank agree as follows: 

1. The Note is amended as follows: 
 (a) The
definition of “Maturity Date” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 ““Maturity Date” means
the day which is July 1, 2016.” 
 2. This Amendment is not an agreement to any further or other amendment of the Note. Borrower expressly
acknowledges and agrees that except as expressly amended in this Amendment, the Note, as amended, remains in full force and effect and is ratified and confirmed. The execution of this Amendment shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any Default. 

3. All the terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Note shall have the same meaning as used in the Note, unless otherwise defined in this
Amendment. 
 4. Borrower waives, discharges, and forever releases Bank, Bank’s employees, officers, directors, attorneys, stockholders, and their
successors and assigns, from and of any and all claims, causes of action, allegations or assertions that Borrower has or may have had at any time up through and including the date of this Amendment, against any or all of the foregoing, regardless of
whether any such claims, causes of action, allegations or assertions are known to Borrower or whether any such claims, causes of action, allegations or assertions arose as result of Bank’s actions or omissions in connection with the Note, or
any amendments, extensions or modifications thereto, or Bank’s administration of the debt governed by the Note or otherwise, 
 5. Borrower is
responsible for all costs incurred by Bank, including without limit reasonable attorney fees, with regard to the preparation and execution of this Amendment. 

[Signature Page Follows] 







 This Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Specialized Equipment Export Facility Master Revolving
Note is effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	COMERICA BANK	 		 	MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC
					
	  
  

By:
	 	



	 		 	By:	 	




	Name:	 	PRASHANT PRAKASH	 		 	Name:	 	A. M. Rooke
	Its:	 	PORTFOLIO RISK MANAGER	 		 	Its:	 	President & COO


  
 - 2 -
# JFSC Weather Hotline

/ Published Dec. 8, 2015
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2014-00496]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 150

RIN 3038-AD82

Aggregation of Positions

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2014-00496, appearing on pages 2394-2395, 
in the issue of Tuesday, January 14, 2014, make the following 
correction:
    On page 2394, in the second column, the subject heading is 
corrected to read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. C1-2014-00496 Filed 1-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### CORMIER v. STATE.

No. 21138.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

D. F. Sanders and J. A. Veillon, both of Beaumont, for appellant.

*960Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is forgery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Article 979, P. C., reads as follows: “He is guilty of forgery who without lawful authority, and with intent to injure or defraud, shall make a false instrument in writing *purporting to be the act of another,*in such manner that the false instrument so made would (if the same were. true) have created, increased, diminished, discharged or defeated any pecuniary obligation, or would have transferred, or in any manner have affected any property whatever.” (Italics ours.)

Article 988, P.C., provides: “The instrument must purport to be the act of ‘another,’ and within the meaning of this word, as used in defining forgery, are included this State, the United States, or either of the States or Territories of the Union; all of the several branches of the government or either of them; all public or private bodies, politic and corporate; all courts; all officers, public or private, in their official capacity; all partnerships in professions or trades; and all other persons, whether real or fictitious, *except the person engaged in the forgery."*(Italics ours.)

The alleged forged check set out in the indictment purported to be the act of N. S. Wittman. Mr. Wittman testified that ,the check had not been signed by him and that he had given no one authority to execute the check. Among other things, the court instructed the jury in his charge as follows: “The instrument must purport to be the act of another and you are instructed that within the meaning of the word ‘another’ as herein used, are included any other person *except N. S. Witt-man"*(Italics ours.) Appellant’s timely and proper exception to the charge was overruled. The exception should have been responded to and the charge amended. Wittman purportedly signed the check. Hence an instruction to the effect that he was not included in the term “another” was contrary to the provisions of Article 988, supra, wherein it is observed that, among other things, it is provided that the term “another” as used in Article 979, supra, defining forgery, includes “all other persons, whether real or fictitious, except the person engaged in the forgery.” The act having purported to be that of Wittman, he was included within the term “another”. It follows that the instruction in question was erroneous.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The. foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1206 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1206

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to make the Department of 
    Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund available for support of certain 
                community-based social service agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to make the Department of 
    Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund available for support of certain 
                community-based social service agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ASSETS FORFEITURE FUND TO BE AVAILABLE 
              FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY-BASED SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCIES.

    Section 524(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(13)(A) In addition to any other purpose set forth in this 
subsection, the Fund shall be available to the Attorney General, 
subject to appropriations Acts, for support of community-based social 
service agencies that provide programs for at-risk youth, drug abuse 
prevention, treatment, and control, and victim assistance.
    ``(B) Amounts paid under subparagraph (A) with respect to a fiscal 
year may not exceed 25 percent of the total of amounts paid from the 
Fund with respect to that fiscal year.
    ``(C) In providing support under this paragraph, the Attorney 
General shall, to the greatest extent practicable, give preference to 
social service agencies in communities in which forfeited property is 
located.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with respect to fiscal 
years beginning after the fiscal year in which this Act is enacted.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         12,997
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  78,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,846
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,622
<PP&E>                                         278,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                 24,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,330,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          178,203
<BONDS>                                        1,020,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          215,550
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       295
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,330,860
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,180
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  77,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               30,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,073
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18,432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,030)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,030)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.59)
        

</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 23

- 1694

___________________________
United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Allen Brooks, Jr.

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau

____________
Submitted: August 21, 2023 Filed: October 18, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________
Before G RUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM

Allen Brooks, Jr., was charged with violating the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)(3), after he failed to notify
local law enforcement in Missouri within three days of moving into the jurisdiction.-2- Brooks entered a conditional guilty plea, and t he district court 1 sentence d him to 33
months ’ imprisonment, to be followed by a 20

- year term of supervised release

.

Prior to pleading guilty

, Brooks moved to dismiss the indictment

, arguing that (1) SORNA impermissibly delegates legislative authority to the Attorney General
when it authorizes him to decide whether the statute applies to individuals convicted of a sex offense prior to its enactme nt ; and , (2) SORNA is an improper exercise of Congress’ Commer ce Clause powers. See U.S. Const. Art. I, § 1 (Legislative Power Vested in Congress); id. at § 8, cl. 3 (Regulation of Commerce). Brooks concedes
that his arguments are barred by existing precedent and the district court denied the
motion. Brooks appeals raising the same grounds

, which we review de novo

. See United States v. Anderson, 771 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (8th Cir. 2014) (we review de

novo a defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of a statute and the denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment).

In Gundy v. United S tates , 588 U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 2129 (2019), a plurality of the Supreme Court held that SORNA’s limited delegation of authority as applied to pre

- Act offenders was not impermissible

. See also United States v.
Kuehl , 706 F.3d 917, 920 (8th Cir. 2013) (“We conclude that SORNA provides the Attorney General with an intelligible principle, and is a valid delegation of legislative authority. ”). I n United States v. May , 535 F.3d 912, 921

- 22 (8th Cir. 2008), we held SORNA’s criminal penalties are a valid exercise of the Commerce
Clause. See also Anderson , 771 F.3d at 1069

- 71.

W e are bound by the se precedent s, and w e affirm.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

pua bebz < pua_bebz@yahoo.com > 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:46 PM 

EAS (OST); Faulk, Scott (OST) 

EAS KALAUPAPA 

Dear Department of Transportation, 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, 

and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, 

frequent flights, multiple islands and ease of booking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, 

Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline etc.). It is important we have safe, stable and affordable service to 

Kalaupapa. I travel 3times a week on mokulele airlines for work,and there flight availability is what our 

community depends on. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years.1° J 

Sincerely, 

Ashley Lyman 

1
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I am the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 ("Form 10-K").



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 31, 2009



By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts

R. Preston Pitts

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regan Holding Corp. and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual Report of GCP Applied Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ GREGORY E. POLINGPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ DEAN P. FREEMANVice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: 3/29/2016


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.