alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         313,458
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,028,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,002,030
<PP&E>                                         5,312,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,922,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,050,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,459,468
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       282
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,885,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,050,808
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,481,409
<CGS>                                          2,730,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  853,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                322,625
<INCOME-TAX>                                   40,887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            281,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   281,738
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.10


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jorge A. Celaya, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  *Jorge A. Celaya*                       |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| **      Jorge A. Celaya**     |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                              |   |
| November 29, 2006                                 |   |

 

----
#### GUTIERREZ v. STATE.

No. 20644.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 6, 1939.

H. H. Dunn, of Edinburg, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the burglary of a private residence in the night time; penalty assessed at twelve years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

It is further charged in the indictment that appellant had been convicted of a like offense on a former occasion and had served a term in the penitentiary. He admitted in his testimony that he was convicted of burglary in 1930 and had served nineteen months for it.

The contention is made that this was not a similar offense and that the court’s charge directing the jury as to the penalty was error. We think the former conviction for burglary is a similar offense to the present one of burglarizing a private residence in the night time, and the court’s charge on the subject was proper. See Harbert v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 301, 124 S.W.2d 1005; Sasser v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 347, 98 S.W.2d 211; Strickland v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 410, 28 S.W.2d 818; Warner v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 351, 42 S.W.2d 616.

Other questions are raised which we do not consider of importance, and they are overruled with the exception of the one as to whether or not the State properly proved a case of burglary. The contention that it did not must be sustained. We have examined the record very carefully and find no evidence and no circumstance which would justify the jury in concluding that there was any application of force or fraud, either upon the house entered or upon any individual asserting the right to its ownership, use or occupancy. The record is silent as to the condition of the house other than that it was a five-room residence occupied by the aggrieved party, a widow with a large family of children and grand-children, some of whom it must be assumed are of age or at least married. In this state of the record we are compelled to hold that the State failed to introduce, before the jury, the evidence necessary to sustain the averments in the indict*283ment. For the failure to do so, the case is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Exhibit 35.3












ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2015-LC21

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of June 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association,
as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender
Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000943904
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V, L.P., SERIES 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           2,293,311
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,293,311
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,715,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,115,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,715,319
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   101,634
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       78,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   267,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (244,297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (244,297)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (244,297)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (13.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### COLLINS v. STATE.

No. 21291.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

*940Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault, and his punishment assessed at six years’ confinement in the State penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for reviewr

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                        688
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        1,793
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   12,877
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        12,405
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          12,570
<LOANS>                                       47,446
<ALLOWANCE>                                   406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                78,873
<DEPOSITS>                                    57,588
<SHORT-TERM>                                  0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           883
<LONG-TERM>                                   6,506
<COMMON>                                      14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    13,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                78,873
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               2,950 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             1,240 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              93
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              4,283
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            1,839
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2,145
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         2,138
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 23
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               1,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    646
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  646
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.70
<LOANS-NON>                                   24
<LOANS-PAST>                                  16
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              384
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 4
<RECOVERIES>                                  3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             406
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       406
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Groen Brothers Aviation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Groen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ David GroenDavid GroenPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer)





Date: July 30, 2010
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51140 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JULIA ANN BALDERAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:02-CR-32-1-AML

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julia Ann Balderas has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Balderas has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the brief, Balderas’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We decline to address any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, without prejudice to Balderas’s right to assert such claims in a motionNo. 04-51140 -2- pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
ACCEPTED 13-15-00299-CR THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 8/11/2015 2:11:37 PM CECILE FOY GSANGER

CLERK
#### ALEXANDER et ux. v. FULLWOOD et al.

No. 2383.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Oct. 17, 1940.

*647J. S. Simkins and Claude Milburn, both’ of Corsicana, for appellants.

J. S. Callicutt and Donald Marr, both of Corsicana, for appellees.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

The appellants have filed herein a sworn motion to strike from the transcript ,in the above cause a certain bill of exception. In the motion it is asserted that the bill of exception in question, with the trial, judge’s qualifications thereto, was filed in the lower court and brought up as a part of the transcript in this cause without the appellants’ knowledge or consent.

It is a well settled rule that an appellate court has no jurisdiction to alter, change or correct a record of the court from which the appeal is prosecuted. 3 Tex. Jur. 759; Foxworth-Galbraith Lbr. Co. v. Realty Trust Co., Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 1164; Ennis Mercantile Co. v. Wathen, 93 Tex. 622, 57 S.W. 946.

The proper practice in such case is to apply to the trial court for an order striking out the objectionable matter, or otherwise correcting the record, and then apply to the appellate court for a writ of certiorari to bring up the order of correction or other new matter that has been inserted in the record in the lower court. 3 Tex. Jur. 759, 761; Boggess v. Harris, 90 Tex. 476, 39 S.W. 565.

When applying to the appellate court for a writ of certiorari to bring up such new matter, the application should, where possible, be accompanied by a properly certified copy thereof.. When this is done, the appellate court, upon the granting of the application, may order the certified copies that are so attached to the motion filed in the appellate court as a part of the record and thus avoid the circuitous route of actually issuing the writ of certi-orari and requiring the clerk of the lower court to send up the new matter. Such practice not only reduces the cost but greatly simplifies the procedure to be followed in the appellate court.

Appellants’ motion to strike the bill of exception from the record now on file in this court is overruled.
MASSACHUSETTS 1NSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LINCOLN LABORATORY 244 WOOD STREET LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02420-9108 27 July 2015 Area Code 781 98.1-1200

US Department of Transportation Federal Aviati.on Administration 800 Independence Ave, S.W. Washington, DC 20591

Petition Regarding: Exemption 5210N Regulatory Docket No. FAA-200I -8870-0024
MIT Lincoln Laboratory requests a two year extension to Exemption 5210 which provides relief from 14 CFR 91.319(c). The purpose of the exemption is to allow the conduct of airborne research and development in technology for support of national security. Commercial a.ircraft operated by MIT Lincoln Laboratory are modified and flown in the experimental category for the conduct of airborne research. MIT Lincoln Laboratory has been conducting research safely since the first exemption was granted in 2001. MIT Lincoln Laboratory requests this extension with no other changes except the extension of the expirati.on date. All conditions and li.mitations that currently exist in Regulatory Docket FAA-2001-8870-0024 would remain i.n place and unchanged.

, Sincerely,

~ W. Michael Radoslov.ich
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28


                                    Cornell Capital Partners, LP
                                  101 Hudson Street, Suite 3700
                                        Jersey City, NJ 07302
                          Tel: (201) 985-8300/ Fax: (201) 985-8266

April 28, 2005



VIA FACSIMILE (847) 984-6201
Voyager One, Inc.
859 West End Court- Suite I
Vernon Hil1s, IL 60081


Attention:        Sebastien C. DuFort, President

          Re:     VOYAGER ONE, INC

Dear Mr. DuFort:

         Please be advised that we wi11 grant the company an extension to and
including May 15, 2005 to have the registration statement, filed pursuant to
the Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated May 14, 2004, declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This extension is effective
as of today's date.





                                           Cornell Capital Partners, LP



                                           By:  /s/ Mark Angelo
                                                --------------------------------
                                           Name:  Mark Angelo
                                           Tit1e:   President
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 38 Received in Senate (RDS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 38

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2009

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2009, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2009 (division A of Public Law 110-329) is 
amended by striking

              

 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``March 11, 2009''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
(logo) **Deutsche Bank**

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TOCOMPLIANCE

 

DBWF 2015-LCM Mortgage Trust

 

The undersigned, David Co, aDirector of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the CertificateAdministrator (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Trust and ServicingAgreement, dated as of June 25, 2015 (the "Agreement"), by and among,Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, ADivision of PNC Bank National Association, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian, here bycertifies in accordance with Section 11.07 of the Agreement:

 

A) A review of such CertifyingServicer's activities from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the"reporting period") and of such Certifying Servicer's performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and

B) That, as to the best ofsuch officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respectsthroughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2017