alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Higgins, Cortney" [Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: 08/06/2012 01:25 PM GMT

To: Chuck French; Ann Johnson

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hard and 

Decorative Chromium Electroplating, Chromium Anodizing, and Steel Pickling Residual Risk and Technology 

Review Rule

Hi Chuck and Ann,

Consistent with our EOs, attached are the handouts from this meeting.

Regards,

Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hard 

and Decorative Chromium Electroplating, Chromium Anodizing, and Steel Pickling Residual Risk and 

Technology Review Rule

When: Friday, August 03, 2012 3:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by Christian Richter, The Policy Group on behalf of the National Association 

for Surface Finishing.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 4

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States allowing

an item veto in appropriations bills.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. EWING, Mr. GOSS, Mr.

RAMSTAD, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr.

THOMAS of Wyoming, Mr. FAWELL, Mr. SCHAEFER, Mr. MCCANDLESS,

Mr. OXLEY, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. PENNY, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr.

ZELIFF, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr.

BAKER of California, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. BURTON, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. PACKARD, Mr.

BEREUTER, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. QUILLEN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. WALSH, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr.

BARTON, Mr. UPTON, Mr. PETRI, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. STUMP, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. TALENT, Mr. SAXTON, Mrs. BENTLEY, and Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States allowing an item veto in appropriations bills.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol-
2

HJ 4 IH

1 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con2 stitution, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes

3 as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legisla4 tures of three-fourths of the several States:

5 ‘‘ARTICLE—

6 ‘‘SECTION 1. The President shall have the power to

7 disapprove any appropriation or provision and approve any

8 other appropriation or provision in the same appropriation

9 bill. In such case he shall, in signing the bill, designate

10 the appropriations and provisions disapproved, and shall

11 return a copy of such appropriations and provisions, with

12 his objections, to the House in which the bill shall have

13 originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had

14 as in the case of other bills disapproved by the President.

15 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall be inoperative unless

16 it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Con17 stitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

18 States within seven years from the date of its submis19 sion.’’.

Æ
#### Samuel R. Serio et al., Respondents, v Diane A. Radin et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.), dated May 4, 1989, as denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

*613The instant action was commenced by the plaintiffs to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an incident which occurred on August 23, 1982. The plaintiff Samuel Serio was injured on that date when the car he was driving was hit in the rear by a car driven by the defendant Diane A. Radin.

The medical reports and affidavit submitted by Serio’s treating physician indicate that he suffered cervical and lumbosacral sprains without neurological complications. Under these circumstances, Serio failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that he suffered a "significant limitation of use of a body function or system” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; *Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230; *De Filippo v White,*101 AD2d 801; *see also, Palmer v Amaker,*141 AD2d 622). The plaintiffs’ attempt to come within another portion of the statutory definition of "serious injury” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]), i.e., by contending that the nonpermanent injury or impairment prevented Serio " 'from performing substantially all of the material acts which constitute [his] usual and customary daily activities for not less than ninety days during the one hundred eighty days immediately following the occurrence of the injury or impairment’ ” *(Licari v Elliott, supra,*at 236; *see, De Filippo v White, supra,*at 803; *Palmer v Amaker, supra,*at 622), is similarly without merit. Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,185,326
<SECURITIES>                                10,888,595
<RECEIVABLES>                               47,727,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                   485,826
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            69,266,276
<PP&E>                                      26,818,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             140,491,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,803,576
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,110
<OTHER-SE>                                 109,268,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               140,491,700
<SALES>                                     58,069,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,069,874
<CGS>                                       53,058,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               53,058,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (507,415)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,499,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,695,269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,804,119
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,804,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23
                                   ----------





                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No.  333-88622)  of our report  dated  September  20, 2004,
except for note 22 which is dated  October 12, 2004 which  report is included in
the Form 10-KSB of Groen  Brothers  Aviation,  Inc.  for the year ended June 30,
2004.



/s/ Tanner + Co.



Salt Lake City, Utah
October 13, 2004
#### In the Matter of Incorporated Village of Babylon, Appellant, v Alan Schneider, as Personnel Officer of the County of Suffolk, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination dated April 5, 1983, of the New York State Department of Civil Service denying a request of the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service to classify the position of assistant to the Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Babylon as noncompetitive, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), entered June 17, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as time barred. A proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 must be commenced within four months after the determination to be reviewed becomes final and binding upon the petitioner *(see,*CPLR 217). Here, the determination became final and binding on April 5, 1983, when the respondent informed the petitioner that the New York State Department of Civil Service had denied its request to classify the position held by Charles Gardner, assistant to the Mayor, as noncompetitive. The petitioner should have sought judicial review at that time. Instead, the petitioner sought to circumvent the requirements of the Civil Service Law by informing the respondent that it was reassigning Mr. Gardner to his original civil service *498position of heavy equipment operator, while it continued to employ him as assistant to the Mayor, a position for which he did not meet the minimum qualifications. The respondent was unaware of this discrepancy until 1987, when it was informed by a third party that Mr. Gardner was actually performing the duties of a code enforcement officer, a competitive civil service position for which he had not taken an examination.

The petitioner then passed a resolution giving code enforcement duties to the assistant to the Mayor. The petitioner may not benefit from its flagrant circumvention of the Civil Service Law and seek to toll the Statute of Limitations for the more than five-year period that elapsed before the scheme was discovered. Moreover, the petitioner’s failure to name the New York State Department of Civil Service as a party also mandated dismissal of the proceeding *(see,*CPLR 1001, 1003; *see, Matter of Hammond v Ricker,*140 App Div 19, *affd*200 NY 527). Lawrence, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1994-D, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         268,012
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  87,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               355,775
<PP&E>                                         2,878,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (910,327)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,324,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,914
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,319,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,324,120
<SALES>                                        198,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,878
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  561,411<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (391,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (391,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (391,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 30, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00407

- CV

Marian HADDAD

, Appellant

v.

TRI

- COUNTY A/C & HEATING, LLC

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 0908

- CV

Honorable Gary L. Steel , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting e n b anc : Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice 1

Luz El e na Chapa, Justice 2

Irene Rios, Ju stice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A . Rodriguez, Justice

On Se ptember 3 0, 2020, a panel of this court dismissed this appeal for want of

jurisdiction based on a late

- filed notice of appeal. On October 30, 2020, A ppellant filed a

motion for en banc reconsiderat ion

, see Tex. R. App. P. 49.7

, without requesting an exten sion of

t im e to file the motion

, see Tex. R. App. P

. 49.8. The en banc court sua sponte extended

the deadline for A ppellant to file a motion for extension of time, which she filed on November

23, 2020

. We request ed A ppellee to file a response to Appellan t ’ s motio n for en ba nc

consideration , which the Appellee then filed on December 3, 2020

. After consideration, the

motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

1 Jus tice Alvarez d issen ts with opinion

.

2 Justice Chapa dissents to the denial of the motion for en banc recon sideration and joins Ju stice Alvarez ’ s opinion

dissenting from the denial

.IN WITNE SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of December, 2020

.

___________________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Cou rt
Hoa. T. X. TriLmhle, pnm 2 malntcuaanoa

of 8amolhounee should be f88oz ~11)tt005 BS th6 ht ttd 15t0 Ofr00t. 

### not have b6an oonknplated t&it,ianteed 

### of tha law bsd5g 0rre0tm ita66dbt6iyOT in 90 days artor ttaj

oumuant at the ram2.06t,it nhoulu not 

### eat int o l 

### mot untir the 

### rouous.~ mar, and yet tbntWOtila

be the b&OH1 

### l%lUltif the jUt&Xlnt of the loucr oourt a!loald IIE sustained.

.. . * 

### !&la deoldon 1618

r0u0w by the comadaaion of .4pjmnls in Bltndttv. Hegar@ Qoanty J&o fndopcadent Who& This antm oonowrneb the toxsMUty y a Mstxlot, 285 SW. 27l (o-an a"&" h~~t~;y;tad~;'. loaatad in tsrrltorysnnexoC to the dietrlot dur3.q the year. In holding eaah proparty taxable by the Qlatrlot ths &reds8ion, Jutl4-p

Raney writing, said: 

### “TheQeoiaioain tkw OalBo or **Cedom** 

### 1. mete* (Tttx. Oiv. App.) 185 9.W. 367, is 

### eathority for tbs propositionthat, when an independent8ohool dlstriotis oreet+dattertJmlstof 

### Januarycd 6 utv65 yenr, all property tit&b mob mwly orel t66 distrfot,whloh waa own06 b tho tewer 05 Jmrmy 1st 

### 0r that yuir, %a su suthoriao6by law, wheth6r sash taxeri hsva authorlmd theretoforear any be author%rult& the pew8r to levy 

### at any t3.m The Baprom court denied a writ or erlwr. *fl@ aan8iQur the propoaltion souml. A l'air 

### aonsldw&lon or the atatutosmldrig pxwislonior tb ommtlonoi indepa~toohooldiatrioteleatns 50 reSWMbl6 l!pound to oonalua6 thnt th6 xaginln

### turn intaat4a

the 50 UabUSty ror taxesrw sohool purpomom in a nohaql (Ustriat should rrlso aatll the gear r03..wft56the amet2on a? the al*- triat; nor did the LoC18lnture 

### Intendthat tha rules or ltitrrr

gore- taxntlon ‘ 0; mz;marposon, 

### or property in now 

### aihoula b6 

### dirrertm mft 3Y- oat6 wtioh 

### govorn&L tar&ion 

### or property ia a 

### newly oreate&

dietriot.

... ".... “A considuretlon

### or the

. .. at-Atutory prcm viai

... 1eai.b to 

### the ofmoluslon that all taxable pmprty nituetod on Junuary lrrt, OS anlp Kiten 

### yem, in u territorywhloh la subsequently, duxine eruch



### y-r', annex& to rp lndepndent fiO'mo1 dlatrL0t
. . . beomwo, by mob nnxmxatfan,

ycer an &ei levied War proptar eutg%ority. ”. ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC., et al., 

Intervenor Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

STATUS REPORT ORDER

On November 20, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed 

down its decision on the Summary and Final Judgment in this case. In light of that decision, the 

Court hereby ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and provide a joint report regarding the 

status of this case and how the parties intend to proceed no later than December 4, 2023.

SO ORDERED on this 20th day of November, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 273 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5355
# L_2007294EN.01002501.xml

| 13.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 294/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 294/25

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 November 2007

appointing a Spanish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2007/728/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Mr IRIBARREN FENTANES, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Mr IRIBARREN FENTANES,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Alberto CATALÁN HIGUERAS, Consejero de Relaciones Institucionales y Portavoz del Gobierno de la Comunidad Foral de Navarra, is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2007.

For the Council

The President

R. PEREIRA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc., Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P. and Trump Entertainment Resorts
Funding, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Francis X. McCarthy, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer
of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.



|                                                                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    FRANCIS X. MCCARTHY,
JR.                                                                                                                                           
|Francis X. McCarthy, Jr. Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P. Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.
|                                                                                                                                                                          
|August 15, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6353
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABDULA F. GORDON, a/k/a Bee, a/k/a Ricky Gordons, a/k/a Rass, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-91-118-JH, CA-95-70-HNM) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abdula F. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gordon , Nos. CR-91-118-JH; CA-95-70-HNM (D. Md. Jan. 12, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### BAKER v. STATE.

No. 21328.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

J. Fielding Jones and Roy Y. Martin, both of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by, the Court.
Order entered November 29, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00238-CR

JOSE EDUARDO GUERRERO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-75211-X

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 22, 2017 motion to extend time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent that appellant’s brief shall be filed within 

thirty days from the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Case 3:22-cr-00411-M Document 24 Filed 05/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47