alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,821
<SECURITIES>                                     2,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                       445
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,434
<PP&E>                                           8,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,357
<SALES>                                         10,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,150
<CGS>                                            5,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,075   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (160)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,615)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           49
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         239,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  238,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,307
<INVENTORY>                                     74,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,649
<PP&E>                                       1,434,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                 924,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,306,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,349,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,875,000
<COMMON>                                    16,910,544
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,275,779)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,306,973
<SALES>                                        706,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               706,620
<CGS>                                          664,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,447,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,923,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,923,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,923,131)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Mitchell, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.), *517rendered January 5, 1989, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s assertion that the hearing court improperly denied his suppression motion is without merit, as the existence of probable cause to arrest the defendant was established by the testimony of the arresting officer *(see, People v Petralia,*62 NY2d 47, *cert denied*469 US 852; *People v Williams,*146 AD2d 724; *People v Molette,*129 AD2d 651; *People v Mingo,*121 AD2d 307; *see also, People v France,*115 AD2d 617).

The defendant’s remaining contention is similarly without merit *(see, People v Russo,*45 AD2d 1040). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
*OPINION ISSUED OCTOBER 10, 2007*

#### JOHN W. MORROW and DEVONNA MORROW VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-06-096)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

*39Jason C. Workman, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimants brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when their 2004 Dodge Stratus struck a hole while they were traveling on Route 41 in Lewis County. Route 41 is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to make an award in this claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred at approximately 9:30 a.m. on March 27, 2006. Route 41 is a two-lane highway at the area of the incident involved in this claim. Claimant John Morrow testified that he was driving on Route 41 when his vehicle struck a hole in the road that he had not seen. He stated that the hole was approximately one foot wide and eight to ten inches deep. Claimants’ vehicle struck the hole sustaining damage to both passenger side rims and tires totaling $601.70. Claimants’ insurance deductible was $500.00.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Route 41 at the site of the claimant’s accident for the date in question. Respondent did not present any witnesses or evidence at the hearing of this matter.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins vs. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645; 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman vs. Dept. of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had at least constructive notice of the hole which claimants ’ vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. The size of the hole and the time of the year in which claimants’ incident occurred leads the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this hazardous condition and respondent had an adequate amount of time to take corrective action. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent and claimants may make a recovery for the damage to their vehicle.

In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimants in this claim in the amount of $500.00.

Award of $500.00.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas H. Reslewic, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

|                 |  |     |  |                        
|---------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|February 9, 2004 |  | /s/ |  | Thomas H. Reslewic     
|                 |  |     |  |                        
|                 |  |     |  | Thomas H. Reslewic     
|                 |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of American Natural Energy Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Steven P. Ensz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Steven P. Ensz
-------------------
Steven P. Ensz
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2004
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES -COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60687

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARVIS TABOR, A/K/A as Turk,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:94-CR-52-S

- - - - - - - - - -

July 5, 1996

Before GARWOOD, EMILIO M. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marvis Tabor appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. He

contends that the district court erred when it considered conduct

described in Count One of his indictment, a count to which he did

not plead guilty, as relevant conduct when sentencing him. Tabor

has not shown that the district court's use of the amount of

cocaine described in Count One to determine his base offense
No. 95-60687

-2-

level was clearly erroneous. United States v. Byrd, 898 F.2d

450, 452 (5th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1059 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1059

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
    Assistance Act to provide eligibility for an heir of a deceased 
   homeowner to receive certain housing-related disaster assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2009

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Tanner, and Mr. Cohen) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
    Assistance Act to provide eligibility for an heir of a deceased 
   homeowner to receive certain housing-related disaster assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR HOUSING-RELATED DISASTER ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 408(b) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5174(b)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Eligibility of heirs of deceased homeowners.--In the 
        event the owner of an owner-occupied private residence dies, an 
        heir taking legal possession of the residence under applicable 
        law shall be eligible for assistance under subsections (c)(2) 
        and (c)(3) in place of the deceased owner.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a major disaster declared by the President under 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) on or after January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 Recognizing the Skirmish at Kemp’s Landing Joint and Combined Warfighting School, Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University
 JFSC Faculty, Pat Hannum published "Recognizing the Skirmish at Kemp’s Landing" in Journal of the American Revolution. Published- 17 Dec 2018.
 SHARE
 PRINT
  14th Regiment of Foot 2nd Virginia regiment Chesapeake Bay Dunmore's Proclamation Great Bridge Kemp's Landing Lord Dunmore Militia Norfolk Slavery
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Compensation Policy for Directors of Orchid BioSciences, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 COMPENSATION POLICY FOR DIRECTORS OF ORCHID BIOSCIENCES, INC. 
  
 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004 
  
 Compensation Policy 
  
  

				
	 Board of Directors:
	  	 	 
		
	 Annual retainer-chairperson
	  	$	25,000
	 Annual retainer-director
	  	$	12,500
	 Meeting fee
	  	$	3,000
	 Telephonic meetings will be paid at the prorated level of $500 per hour.
	  	 	 
		
	 Audit Committee:
	  	 	 
		
	 Annual retainer-chairperson
	  	$	5,000
	 Annual retainer-committee members
	  	$	1,500
	 Meeting fee:
	  	$	1,000
	 Meeting fee (in person for meetings held on days separate from full Board meeting)
	  	$	3,000
	 Telephonic meetings will be paid at the prorated level of $500 per hour.
	  	 	 
		
	 Compensation Committee:
	  	 	 
		
	 No annual retainer to be paid to compensation committee chairperson or members.
	  	 	 
	 Meeting fee
	  	$	1,000
	 Meeting fee (in person meetings held on days separate from full Board meeting)
	  	$	3,000
	Telephonic meetings will be paid at the prorated level of $500 per hour.	  	 	 

  
 Board members and
committee members receive stock option grants both upon joining the Board and on an annual basis in line with recommendations by the Compensation Committee, which grants are non-qualified stock options under our 2000 Employee, Director and
Consultant Stock Incentive Plan, which grants typically vest in monthly increments over 4 years.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1336 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1336

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise eligibility for 
  outpatient services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 1993

 Mr. Montgomery (by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise eligibility for 
  outpatient services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1712(a)(1) 
of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (2) by striking out the period at the end of subparagraph 
        (B) and inserting in lieu thereof ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(D) for any disability of a veteran who has a service-
        connected disability and who has been awarded the Purple 
        Heart.''.

                                 <all>
```
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0163 

HOLLY ANNE MATHIS, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee: 

ORDER 

FILED:__ 

__AUG 2 1 2024 

- Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

sintantltstontana. 

Self-represented Appellant Holly Anne Mathis moves this Court for a subpoena 

duces tecum of a document. She has filed a brief in support. The State of Montana 

responds in opposition. 

Mathis appeals a January 16, 2024 Order dismissing her PetitiOn for Post Conviction 

Relief and Methoranda along with denying her Motion for a Subpoena Duces Tecum, 

issued in the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County. Mathis requests that this Court 

review—in-camera—a produced copy of an investigative subpoena served upon a 

counselor in the underlying criminal case. 

The State responds that Mathis's motion is improper. The State explains that her 

motion is an attempt to expand the record with a document that was not before the District 

Court and its ruling upon Mathis's Petition. M. R. App. P. 8(1). The State relies on the 

general rule that parties are bound to the record on appeal. Bahm v. Southworth, 2000 MT 

244, ¶ 11, 301 Mont. 434, 10 P.3d 99; In re C.M.C., 2009 MT 153, ¶ 37; 350 Mont. 391, 

208 P.3d 809. The State concludes that denial is appropriate. 

We agree with the State. This Court has received the record on appeal. As an 

appellate court of review, this Court does not conduct fact-finding, discovery, or other 

document acquisition. M. R. App. P. 1. Mathis is not entitled to her request. Therefore, 

08/21/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0163
IT IS ORDERED that Mathis's Motion for Subpoena Duces Tecum is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Holly Anne Mathis personally. 

DATED this e 1 ty of August, 2024. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1284 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 67
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1284

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 20, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 103 West Main Street in McLain, Mississippi, as the ``Major Ed W. 
                         Freeman Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR ED W. FREEMAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 103 West Main Street in McLain, Mississippi, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Major Ed W. Freeman Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major Ed 
W. Freeman Post Office''.
                                                        Calendar No. 67

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1284

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 103 West Main Street in McLain, Mississippi, as the ``Major Ed W. 
                         Freeman Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 20, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```