#### NATIONAL AID LIFE ASS’N v. HORNE et al.

No. 7707.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1941.

Wilcox & Wood, of Georgetown, for plaintiff in error.

Ramsey & Ramsey, of San Augustine, for defendant in error.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This is a suit on a life insurance policy, and the only material question to be determined is whether the insurance association waived the timely payment of the monthly premium. The monthly premium was due on January 1, 1938, and was pay*911able at the home office of the association, but under the grace period of the contract the insured had all of the month of January in which to pay same. On or about January 11th the insured caused a check, drawn on a San Augustine, Texas, bank for the • amount of the premium, to be mailed to the association at its home office in Oklahoma City. The check was received by the association on January 14th and immediately deposited for collection. Through an error of the insured the check was drawn on the wrong bank, and as a result payment thereof was refused by the bank on January 24th. The check was returned by the bank to the insurance association on the afternoon of January 25th, and on January 26th the insurance association wrote insured as follows:

> “Your check as above described has been returned by the bank upon which it was drawn, unpaid.

> “This check was tendered this Association in payment of your insurance contract listed below, and since the check has been returned unpaid, your insurance will lapse unless payment is mailed on or before the last day of this month, and received by us.

> “May we impress upon you the importance of giving this your immediate attention, because as above indicated, any delay may cause your insurance to lapse?”

The letter was sent to insured’s address at Bronson, Texas, but she had moved in the meantime to San Augustine, and as a result she did not receive the letter until late in the afternoon of January 31st. She did not undertake to remit for the premium that day, but on February 1st she did mail to the association a check for the premium. The association declined to accept the last check in payment of the premium because same was not tendered within the time provided for in the policy, and declared a forfeiture. The insured died March 23d.

Very clearly, the depositing of the first check in the bank for collection by the insurance association did not constitute an acceptance of the same in payment for the premium, where payment of the check was afterwards refused by the bank upon which it was drawn. Texas Mutual Life Insurance Ass’n v. Smartt, 131 Tex. 227, 114 S.W.2d 528.

The Court of Civil Appeals held that by writing the letter of date January 26th the insurance association extended to the insured an invitation to reply by mail within a reasonable time, and that it thereby assumed the risk of delay in the mail, and since the insured replied within a reasonable time after receipt of the letter, the payment forwarded on February 1st was in time. See 135 S.W.2d 254. We are not in accord with this view. The first check failed as a medium of payment through the error of the insured in drawing it on the wrong bank, and without any fault on the part of the insurance association. Notice of non-payment was promptly mailed to the insured, but due to her error in failing to advise the association of the change of her address, and in failing to 'leave a forwarding address at the post office, she did not receive the letter until late in the afternoon of January 31st. This delay was due to no fault of the association. The letter from the association to the insured, of date January 26th, is not susceptible of the construction that the insured would have a *reasonable time*after receipt thereof in which to mail a check for the premium. It specifically states that “* * * your insurance will lapse unless payment is mailed on or before the last day of this month, and received by us.” It could hardly have been made any more certain that unless the check for the premium was mailed on or before January 31st the policy would lapse. There was, therefore, no waiver on the part of the insurance association of the timely payment of the premium, and as a consequence the policy lapsed because of the failure to pay same within the time provided for in the policy.

The judgments of the trial court and of the Court of Civil Appeals are reversed, and judgment here rendered for the defendant.