alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30082]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Emergency Consideration 
Request

    In compliance with Public Law 104-13, the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995, the Social Security Administration (SSA) is providing notice 
of its information collections that require submission to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB). SSA is requesting emergency consideration 
from OMB by 12/06/2000 of the information collections listed below.
    1. Beneficiary Interview and Auditor's Observations Form-0960-NEW.
    The information collected through the Beneficiary Interview and 
Auditor's Observations form, SSA-322, will be used by SSA's Office of 
the Inspector General (OIG) to interview beneficiaries and/or their 
caregivers to determine whether representative payees are complying 
with their duties and responsibilities. Respondents to this collection 
will be randomly selected Supplemental Security Income recipients and 
Social Security beneficiaries that have representative payees.
    Number of Respondents: 150.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 38 hours.

Background Information

    In May of this year Congress held hearings on SSA's representative 
payee program. These hearings were the result of an investigation 
conducted by SSA's OIG involving a representative payee who embezzled 
over $300,000 of Social Security payments, and recent media attention. 
Following these hearings SSA began a number of initiatives to improve 
oversight of representative payees. One of the initiatives requested by 
Congress was for OIG to perform audits of representative payees. 
Specifically, Congress requested an independent OIG review and 
assessment of SSA's representative payee program. In conjunction with 
this oversight, Congress has further advised SSA that briefings on the 
representative payee program are expected and additional congressional 
hearings are planned in early spring. This information collection is 
therefore necessary to comply with the congressional reporting 
requirements in a timely manner and to augment other data needed for 
determining whether representative payees are complying with their 
duties.
    You can obtain a copy of the collection instruments and/or OMB 
clearance packages by calling the SSA Reports Clearance Officer on 
(410) 965-4145, or by writing to him.
SSA Address
Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: Frederick W. Brickenkamp, 
6401 Security Blvd., 1-A-21 Operations Bldg., Baltimore, MD 21235

    Dated: November 20, 2000.
Frederick W. Brickenkamp,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30082 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-29-U
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se eFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 14 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, vs. KERRY CHAPLIN, Defendant - Appellant. No. 97-5075 (D.C. No. 97-CV-78-C) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before PORFILIO , KELLYand HENRYCircuit Judges. ** Mr. Chaplin, an inmate appearing pro se and in form a pauperis, seeks to appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U .S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. He seeks a cert ificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). On appeal, he raises juris dictional arguments, claims rejected on direct appeal, see United States v. Edwards , 69 F.3d 419 (10th Cir.- 2 -

1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 2497 (1996), and a claim of ineffectiv e assistance of counsel. The jurisdictional arguments are merit less, see , e.g. , United States v. Wacker , 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir. 1995), 117 S. Ct. 1 36 (1996), the claims raised on direct appeal may not be raised in a coll ateral attack pursuant to a § 2255 motion absent an intervening change in the law , United States v. Warner , 23 F.3d 287, 291 (10th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 1152 (1996), and the ineffective assistance claim based upon claims reje cted on direct appeal necessarily fails due to lack of prejudice. Becaus e Mr. Chaplin has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal cons titutional right, we DENY his motion for a certificate of appealability and DISMI SS the appeal.

Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2,572,144
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,662,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               966,513
<PP&E>                                         279,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (65,591)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,443,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          782,692
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       282
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,975,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,443,748
<SALES>                                        2,709,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,759,967
<CGS>                                          1,207,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  589,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                937,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                   121,348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            816,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   816,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .35
        


</TABLE>
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 63 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-61554) and Amendment No. 451 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 1, 2015
#### RICH v. STATE.

No. 21444.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1941.

T. O. Murray, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Collin County on a charge of driving while intoxicated, and his punishment assessed at five days in jail and a fine of $50.

The proceedings appear regular and the facts are sufficient to warrant the conviction. No statement of facts or bills of exception are presented and there is nothing for this court to review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Skip to main content


NCD.gov
      
      
      -A +ASearch form
    SearchFollow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter About UsNewsroomNewsroom HomeTestimony & SpeechesNewsletterFunding OpportunitiesProgress ReportsPublicationsResourcesFAQsMeeting & EventsOther Events30 on ADA 30NCD policy briefings to Congressional staff on AbilityOne ReportAccountabilityBuy American Act ReportsGovernment Performance and Results Act ReportsCongressional Budget Justification ReportsFinancial Audit ReportsNCD Strategic PlanNCD Annual Employee SurveyNCD BylawsNo Fear ActFOIAFOIA e-LibraryAnnual ReportsQuarterly ReportsChief FOIA Officer ReportsMake a FOIA RequestReference GuideNCD FOIA RegulationEquity
 Preview NCD's New NCD.gov Website in Beta
  
  Take a look at the new beta site, an early, in-progress version at beta.NCD.gov
          Page not foundSkip to Page ContentThe requested page "/rawmedia_repository/gpra2005.htm" could not be found. NCD Policy Areas
  
  CRPDCivil RightsCultural DiversityEducationEmergency ManagementEmploymentFinancial Assistance & IncentivesHealth CareHousingInternationalLong Term Services & SupportTechnologyTransportationYouth Perspectives Contact Us
  
  If you have a question or comment, please let us know.
202-272-2004 (voice)
202-272-2022 (Fax)   Email NCD   Language Access Needs? Stay Connected with NCD
  
  Subscribe to NCD Updates   Newsroom   Join us on Facebook   Follow us on Twitter   Follow us on Instagram   Subscribe to our YouTube Channel   Follow us on LinkedIn   Meetings and Events   Link to Us   NCD Council & Staff
Employment Opportunities
 **National Council on Disability**   1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850   Washington, DC 20004
#### NELOMS v. STATE.

No. 21351.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1941.

J. G. Minkert, of Bryan, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, for the purpose of sale, in a dry area. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of five months.

The transcript in the present instance contains only a “docket entry” of the notice of appeal, which is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court. Article 827, C.C.P., requires that notice of appeal be given “in open court” and “entered of record.” In the absence of a showing that the docket entry was carried into the minutes of the trial court, this court is without authority to entertain the appeal. See Lucas v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 277, 135 S.W.2d 720; Bertrand v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 393, 136 S.W.2d 849, 850; Bagley v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 70 S.W.2d 177; Rodriguez v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 539, 132 S.W.2d 867; Casey v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 111, 32 S.W.2d 461.

We also note that the statement of facts is not approved by the trial judge.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXAS DIVISION

Viral DRM LLC §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

§ Case No. 3:22-cv-02528-M

v. §

§

Classic Chevrolet Buick GMC of §

Cleburne, LLC §

§

Defendant.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

TO THE HONORABLE BARBARA M. G. LYNN (U.S.D.J.) 

MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, plaintiff Viral DRM LLC (“Plaintiff”) respectfully 

notifies the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle pending their negotiation 

of a final settlement agreement. We therefore respectfully request that the Court adjourn all 

pending dates and grant the parties forty-five (45) days to consummate their transaction before 

filing a Notice of Dismissal. No other dates will be impacted by this request. Defendant Classic 

Chevrolet Buick GMC of Cleburne, LLC consents to the filing of this Notice.

Respectfully submitted,

SANDERS LAW GROUP

/s/James H. Freeman/

James H. Freeman, Esq.

NY State Bar No.: 4001533

333 Earle Ovington Blvd., Ste. 402

Uniondale, NY 11553

Tel: (516) 203-7600

Email: jfreeman@sanderslaw.group

Case 3:22-cv-02528-M Document 16 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 70
RLF1 14771271v.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Settlement was served on all counsel of record via CM/ECF on February 21, 2023.

/s/jameshfreeman/

James H. Freeman

Case 3:22-cv-02528-M Document 16 Filed 02/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 71
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TYRONE L. WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3246

[January 18, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No.

562019CF002031A. 

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,477,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,803,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,864
<INVENTORY>                                  2,691,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,137,700
<PP&E>                                       2,267,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                 673,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,821,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,553,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500,000
<COMMON>                                    35,743,536
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,821,053
<SALES>                                      4,985,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,985,036
<CGS>                                        3,634,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,943,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,852,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,895,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,444,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,444,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,444,651)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.36)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


 



AMENDMENT NO. 2


to the


AMENDED AND RESTATED


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







 



                                      AMENDMENT ("Amendment No. 2") dated September 25, 2015, and made effective as of the date of commencement of employment by Stefan Larsson (the "Effective Date"), by and between Ralph Lauren Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Ralph Lauren (the "Executive").


 




WHEREAS, the Executive currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive dated June 26, 2012, as amended (the "Employment Agreement"); and







WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects;







NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be bound, the parties hereby agree as follows.







1.            Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows, effective as of the Effective Date:







"Title and Duties. The Executive shall serve as Chief Creative Officer of the Company and Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") and shall have such duties, authority and responsibilities as are normally associated with and appropriate for such positions. The Executive shall report directly to the Board. The Executive shall devote substantially all of his working time and efforts to the business and affairs of the Company."







2.            Except as amended and/or modified by this Amendment No. 2, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unaltered and unchanged by this Amendment No. 2.













1















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be duly executed and the Executive has hereunto set his hand on the date first set forth above, as of the Effective Date.




 




	 	RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION	 
	 		
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Joel Fleishman	 
	 	 	Name:  	Joel Fleishman	 
	 	 	Title:	Chairman of the Compensation & Organizational Development Committee	 
	 	 	 	 





 






	 	EXECUTIVE	
	 	 	 
	
 

	/s/ Ralph Lauren	 
	 	
Ralph Lauren

	 
	 	 	 





 




 


2
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1152

AN ACT

To direct the United States Sentencing Commission

for hate crimes.nal cases that provide sentencing enhancementsto make sentencing guidelines for Federal crimi-
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1152

AN ACT

To direct the United States Sentencing Commission to make

sentencing guidelines for Federal criminal cases that provide sentencing enhancements for hate crimes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hate Crimes Sentenc5 ing Enhancement Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 1152 EH

1 SEC. 2. DIRECTION TO COMMISSION.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to section 994 of title

3 28, United States Code, the United States Sentencing

4 Commission shall promulgate guidelines or amend existing

5 guidelines to provide sentencing enhancements of not less

6 than 3 offense levels for offenses that the finder of fact

7 at trial determines beyond a reasonable doubt are hate

8 crimes. In carrying out this section, the United States

9 Sentencing Commission shall assure reasonable consist10 ency with other guidelines, avoid duplicative punishments

11 for substantially the same offense, and take into account

12 any mitigating circumstances which might justify excep13 tions.

14 (b) DEFINITION.—As used in this Act, the term

15 ‘‘hate crime’’ is a crime in which the defendant inten16 tionally selects a victim, or in the case of a property crime,

17 the property which is the object of the crime, because of

18 the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national ori19 gin, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation of any person.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Ex parte TILL.

No. 21268.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 16, 1940.

L. P. DeLee, of Dallas, for appellant,

. Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

After a hearing upon a writ of habeas corpus appellant was remanded to custody by the . Honorable Henry King, Judge of Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County. Hence this appeal.

No statement of facts is brought fqr-ward.. However, it appears from the re7 turn of the sheriff that he held appellant b.y virtue of a warrant and final judgments *949of conviction in two cases. There is nothing in the record to show that appellant was entitled to be released.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IA 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 11 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide 

that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of persons 

in each State who are citizens of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of persons in 

each State who are citizens of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 11 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘Representatives shall be apportioned among the sev5 eral States according to their respective numbers, which 

6 shall be determined by counting the number of persons 

7 in each State who are citizens of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 
 Pursuant
        of 18 U.S.C. 63 1350, the Chief Financial Officer of Conmed Healthcare
        Management, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that this Form 10-QSB and
        the
        financial statements thereto fully comply with the requirements of Sections
        13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
        information contained in the Form 10-QSB and the financial statements thereto
        fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of
        operations of the Company.
 
 May
        15,
        2007
 By
        /s/
        Thomas W. Fry
 Thomas
        W.
        Fry
 Chief
        Financial Officer
  **A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to and will be retained by Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. and
        will
        be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.**