alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1st QUARTER 2018*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMEN AUCTIONETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/28 1/2 1/4 50.00 48.00 42.00 20.00 130.00 30.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 1/4 1/9 1/11 50.00 48.00 42.00 120.00 20.00

1/11 1/16 1/18 45.00 48.00 42.00 125.00 10.00

1/18 1/22 1/25 45.00 48.00 42.00 125.00 10.00

1/25 1/29 2/1 25.00 48.00 42.00 20.00 145.00 -10.00

2/1 2/5 2/8 25.00 51.00 44.00 125.00 -5.00

2/8 2/12 2/15 25.00 51.00 44.00 120.00 0.00

2/15 2/19 2/22 25.00 51.00 44.00 120.00 0.00

2/22 2/26 3/1 25.00 51.00 44.00 20.00 120.00 20.00

3/1 3/5 3/8 45.00 52.00 44.00 100.00 41.00

3/8 3/12 3/15 50.00 52.00 46.00 103.00 45.00

3/15 3/19 3/22 50.00 52.00 46.00 106.00 42.00

3/22 3/26 3/29 50.00 52.00 46.00 20.00 126.00 42.00

1810.00 1565.00 245.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

41-DAY BILL 12/8 12/8 9.00 -9.00

Matures 1/18/2017

123-DAY CMB 8/29 9/1 40.00 -40.00

Matures 1/2/18

72-DAY BILL 2/12 2/13 50.00 0.00 50.00

Matures 4/26/18

72-DAY BILL 3/5 3/6 50.00 0.00 50.00

Matures 5/17/18

CMB Funds: 51.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

2-year note 12/21 12/26 1/2 26.00 0.00

5-year note 12/21 12/27 1/2 34.00 0.00

7-year note 12/21 12/28 1/2 28.00 0.00 73.95 14.05

3-year Note 1/4 1/9 1/16 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 1/4 1/10 1/16 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 1/4 1/11 1/16 12.00 0.00 40.10 15.90

10-year TIPS 1/11 1/18 1/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 1/18 1/23 1/31 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 1/18 1/24 1/31 15.00 0.00

5-year note 1/18 1/24 1/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 1/18 1/25 1/31 28.00 0.00 104.46 11.54

3-year Note 2/7 2/12 2/15 26.00 2.00

10-year Note 2/7 2/12 2/15 24.00 1.00

30-year Bond 2/7 2/13 2/15 16.00 1.00 46.64 19.36

2-year FRN (r) 2/15 2/21 2/23 14.00 0.00 0.00 14.00

30-year TIPS 2/8 2/15 2/28 7.00 0.00

2-year note 2/16 2/20 2/28 28.00 2.00

5-year note 2/16 2/21 2/28 36.00 2.00

7-year note 2/16 2/22 2/28 29.00 1.00 68.24 31.76

3-year Note 3/8 3/12 3/15 28.00 2.00

10-year Note (r) 3/8 3/12 3/15 21.00 1.00

30-year Bond (r) 3/8 3/13 3/15 13.00 1.00 24.00 38.00

10-year TIPS (r) 3/15 3/22 3/30 11.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 3/22 3/28 3/30 14.00 0.00

527.00 357.4 144.60

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 441

*This Financing schedule is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not necessarily

indicate how Treasury will actually issue debt in the future.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Craig W. Carlson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cygnus, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Annual Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual
Report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Craig W. CarlsonCraig W. CarlsonChief Financial Officer
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 443-7978. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 

## Proposed Project 

*Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs*                     (0930-0158, revision)—SAMHSA will request OMB approval for the Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form for Federal agency and federally regulated drug testing programs which must comply with the HHS Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs (59 FR 29908) dated June 9, 1994, and for the information provided by laboratories for the National Laboratory Certification Program (NLCP). The Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form is used by all Federal agencies and employers regulated by the Department of Transportation to document the collection and chain of custody of urine specimens at the collection site, for laboratories to report results, and for Medical Review Officers to make a determination. The Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form is being revised. Major changes include eliminating the split specimen copy, simplifying the chain of custody requirements, revising the outcomes for the laboratory test results, revising the collection instructions, and ensuring that the form follows the sequence of events. Prior to an inspection, a laboratory is required to submit specific information regarding its laboratory procedures to allow inspectors to become familiar with a laboratory's procedures before arriving at the laboratory.                 

The annual total burden estimates for the Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form, the NLCP application, the NLCP inspection checklist, and NLCP recordkeeping requirements is 1,790,664 Hours, as shown below: 

Send comments to Nancy Pearce, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 16-105, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. 

Dated: February 3, 2000. 

Richard Kopanda, 

Executive Officer, SAMHSA. 

[FR Doc. 00-3064 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 79

To authorize the President to issue a proclamation designating the week 
 beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994, as ``National 
                             Family Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

 Mr. Myers of Indiana introduced the following joint resolution; which 
     was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the President to issue a proclamation designating the week 
 beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994, as ``National 
                             Family Week''.

Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly society;
Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family as a unit essential to the 
        continued well-being of the United States; and
Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the importance of 
        family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is hereby 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the week 
beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994 as ``National 
Family Week''.

                                 <all>
```
August	29,	2012

Docket	Operations

M-30

US	Department	of	Transportation	

1200	New	Jersey	Ave,	SE

West	Building	Ground	Floor	Room	W12-140

Washington,	DC	20590

Subject:	Doc.	No. FAA-2002-12728;	Exemption	7897D from	14	CFR	(FAR	Sections)	– 91.409(e),	

91.409(f),	91.501(a)	and	91.503	thru	91.535

The	National	Business	Aviation	Association,	Inc.	(NBAA)	hereby	petitions	for	an	extension	of	

Exemption	No.	7897D for	a	period	of	24	months.	Originally,	Exemption	1637	was	granted	on	

September	12,	1972	and	was	last	amended	by	Exemption	7897B	on	September	2,	2008.	Under	

Exemption	No.	7897B	the	NBAA	is	granted	an	exemption	from	14	CFR	91.409(a)	and	91.501(a)	

to	permit	NBAA	Members	to	operate	small	civil	airplanes	and	helicopters	of	U.S.	registry	under	

the	operating	rules	of	14	CFR	91.503	through	91.535	and	to	select	and	use	an	inspection	

program	described	in	14	CFR	91.409(f).	In	addition,	helicopter	operations	are	not	required	to

comply	with	the	minimum	safe	altitude	rules	of	14	CFR	91.515(a),	provided	these	operations	

comply	with	the	minimum	safe	altitude	requirements	of	14	CFR	91.119.

The	original	justification	for	this	exemption	has	been	confirmed	by	38 years	of	experience.	

Petitioner	is	not	aware	of	any	incidents	or	accidents	attributable	to	faulty	maintenance	or	

inspection	practices	involving	aircraft	operated	under	this	exemption.	There	is	evidence	that	this	

exemption	has	contributed	materially	to	the	increased	safety	of	small	airplane	and	helicopter	

operations	by	permitting	utilization	of	continuous	inspection	procedures.

The	FAA	Part	135/125	Aviation	Rulemaking	Committee	(ARC)	reached	consensus	on	a	

recommendation	document	that	would	incorporate	this	exemption	into	the	Federal	Aviation	

Regulations.	NBAA	actively	supported	this	recommendation	and	encourages	the	FAA	to	adopt	

the	ARC’s	recommendation	in	an	upcoming	rulemaking	initiative,	thereby	eliminating	the	need	

for	this	exemption	in	the	future.	Until	the	ARC	recommendation	is	codified,	however,	this	

exemption	remains	an	important	component	of	the	increased	safety	of	small	airplane	and	

helicopter	operations.

Please	contact	me	if	there	is	any	additional	information	we	can	provide	to	support	the	

processing	of	this	exemption	request.

Respectfully	submitted,

Douglas	Carr

Vice	President

Safety,	Security	&	Regulation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,869
<SECURITIES>                                     5,005
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                       537
<INVENTORY>                                        142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,162
<PP&E>                                           5,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,583
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,469
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,330)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,934
<SALES>                                         24,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,015
<CGS>                                            6,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   236
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
KYLE GRAY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2232

Opinion filed August 16, 2016. 

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Kyle Gray, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is granted a belated appeal of the January 14, 2016, order denying 

motion to correct illegal sentence in Gadsden County Circuit Court case number 2007-

CFA-00573. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be 

provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Chief Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)**
I, Steven P. Ensz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Natural Energy Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting.        Date:  March 31, 2005 /s/ Steven P. Ensz   Steven P. Ensz   Vice President, Finance
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1345 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1345

To designate the Federal building located at 280 South First Street in 
    San Jose, California, as the ``Robert F. Peckham United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1993

 Mr. Mineta (for himself and Mr. Edwards of California) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 280 South First Street in 
    San Jose, California, as the ``Robert F. Peckham United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 280 South First Street in San Jose, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert F. Peckham 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert F. Peckham 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                                  CYGNUS, INC.
               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
 
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                ----------------------------------
                                                                                   1996        1995        1994
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                                                             <C>         <C>         <C>
Primary and fully diluted:
  Weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period.............      18,544      16,265      13,947
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
Shares used in computation of net loss per share..............................      18,544      16,265      13,947
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
Net loss......................................................................  $  (11,052) $  (12,842) $  (17,360)
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
Net loss per share............................................................  $    (0.60) $    (0.79) $    (1.24)
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
                                                                                ----------  ----------  ----------
</TABLE>
 
                                       31
#### Frank M. Nishio et al., Respondents, v E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York *County*(Francis Pécora, J.), entered on or about February 14, 1990, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 7503 (a) to compel arbitration and to stay the underlying action pending completion of arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court properly determined that the defendant, a New York securities firm, had waived its right to compel arbitration by its affirmative use of the judicial process in a dispute with its customer. It is well settled that the right to arbitration, like contract rights generally, may be modified, waived or abandoned. *(Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs.,*64 NY2d 261, 272.)

Although not every foray into the courthouse effects a waiver of the right to arbitrate, nevertheless, where a defendant’s participation in litigation "manifests an affirmative acceptance of the judicial forum, with whatever advantages it may offer in the particular case, his actions are then inconsistent with a later claim that only the arbitral forum is satisfactory.” *(De Sapio v Kohlmeyer,*35 NY2d 402, 405.) Here, defendant demanded a complaint, obtained an extension of time to answer the complaint and then served an answer with counterclaims, sought discovery of documents, and waited more than one year before seeking a stay, all of which evidenced a waiver of the right to arbitrate. *(Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs.,*64 NY2d, *supra,*at 272; *De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35*NY2d, *supra,*at 405.) Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.