alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor 

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far

  |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
#### FOSTER v. CLERK OF LYON CIRCUIT COURT.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 6, 1953.

Robert Foster, pro se.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

Robert D. Foster has personally filed in this court a petition against “Clerk of Lyon Circuit Court” alleging his illegal confinement in the Eddyville penitentiary. The petitioner alleges his wrongful imprisonment upon several grounds and prays this court to grant a writ of habeas corpus, directing W. Jess Buchannan, warden of the penitentiary (not a party), to bring his person before the Lyon Circuit Court, and order the respondent (Clerk of the Lyon Circuit Court) to show cause “why the petitioner is being illegally and unlawfully detained and deprived of his liberty without due process of law.” In another paper styled, “Verified motion and affidavit in forma pauperis in support of petition for writ of mandamus” the petitioner restates the grounds of his illegal confinement and charges that the Lyon Circuit Court has refused to grant him a hearing on his application for a writ of habeas corpus and prays this court to grant a mandamus against the clerk of the circuit court, directing him to present his application to the court and for an order directing Judge Ira Smith, Judge of the circuit court (not a party), to grant the petitioner a speedy hearing on his application. The Attorney General moves to dismiss the proceeding.

The many defects are obvious. We mention some of them.

No person is named respondent. It is not sufficient to designate a party merely as the holder of a certain office. See Kountz v. Brown, 55 Ky. 577, 16 B.Mon. 577.

The original jurisdiction of this court, Sec. 110, Constitution, does not extend to issuing a mandamus against a circuit clerk even if named, for he is but a ministerial officer. Sandusky v. Alsmiller, 291 Ky. 666, 165 S.W.2d 342.

The Court of Appeals cannot consider an original petition for writ of habeas corpus. Burch v. Whaley, 311 Ky. 53, 223 S.W.2d 355.

The petition is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 308 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.308
                                         Agreed to July 29, 2010        

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on any legislative 
day from Thursday, July 29, 2010, through Tuesday, August 3, 2010, on a 
motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority 
Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, 
September 14, 2010, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or her designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as she may designate if, in her 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### DOBBS v. STATE.

No. 21038.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 10, 1940.

E. J. Conn, of Lufkin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for assault with -intent to murder; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought forward for review. No complaints of the procedure have been presented by bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132056 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132056 COA: 267930 St. Joseph CC: 04-012199-FH STEVEN LEE KLINGER, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
Case 4:22-cv-00950-P Document 1-6 Filed 10/21/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 67
Case 4:22-cv-00950-P Document 1-6 Filed 10/21/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 68
Case 4:22-cv-00950-P Document 1-6 Filed 10/21/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 69
Case 4:22-cv-00950-P Document 1-6 Filed 10/21/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 70
Case 4:22-cv-00950-P Document 1-6 Filed 10/21/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 71
Case 4:22-cv-00950-P Document 1-6 Filed 10/21/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 72
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

ERIC JACKSON, ALARIC STONE, and )

MICHAEL MARCENELLE, on behalf of ) 

themselves and all others similarly situated, ) 

 ) Case No. 4:22-cv-00825-P 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

v. ) 

 )

ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official ) 

capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, ) 

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his ) 

official capacity as Secretary of Defense, )

LINDA L. FAGAN, in her official ) 

capacity as Commandant of the Coast Guard, and ) 

BRIAN K. PENOYER, in his official capacity ) 

as Assistant Commandant for Human ) 

Resources of the Coast Guard, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

JOINT REPORT 

 Pursuant to the Court’s September 19, 2022 Order, the parties hereby jointly submit this 

report. The parties propose the following deadlines: 

1. October 7, 2022: Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motions for Class 

Certification, Appointment of Class Counsel, and Preliminary Injunction. 

2. October 14, 2022: Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Opposition. 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 17 Filed 09/22/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 774
2

Dated: September 22, 2022 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Charles W. Fillmore 

 

Stephen Crampton** Charles W. Fillmore 

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Senior Counsel State Bar # 00785861 

PO Box 4506 H. Dustin Fillmore III 

Tupelo, MS 38803 State Bar # 06996010 

(662)255-9439 THE FILLMORE LAW FIRM, L.L.P. 

scrampton@thomasmoresociety.org 201 Main Street, Suite 700 

 Fort Worth, TX 76102 

Michael McHale** (817)332-2351 

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Counsel chad@fillmorefirm.com 

10506 Burt Circle, Ste. 110 dusty@fillmorefirm.com 

Omaha, NE 68114 

(402)501-8586 Nathan Loyd** 

mmchale@thomasmoresociety.org THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Special Counsel 

 5101 Old Highway 5, Box 442 

Adam S. Hochschild** Lebanon, GA 30146 

Hochschild Law Firm (559)744-3664

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Special Counsel nathaniel.loyd@thomasmoresociety.org 

PO Box 401 

Plainfield, VT 05667 

(314)503-0326 

adam@hochschildlaw.com 

Mary Catherine Hodes** 

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Special Counsel 

112 S. Hanley Rd., Second Floor 

Clayton, MO 63105 

(314)825-5725 

mchodes@thomasmoresociety.org 

Paul M. Jonna* 

LiMandri & Jonna LLP 

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY – Special Counsel 

P.O. Box 9120 

Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 

(858)759-994 

pjonna@limandri.com 

** pro hac vice applications pending 

* pro hac vice application forthcoming 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 17 Filed 09/22/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 775
3

BRIAN M. BOYNTON 

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

ALEXANDER K. HAAS 

Branch Director 

ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO 

Deputy Branch Director 

 /s/ Johnny Walker 

CODY T. KNAPP (NY Bar #5715438) 

JOHNNY H. WALKER (D.C. Bar #991325) 

Trial Attorneys 

United States Department of Justice 

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 

1100 L Street NW, Rm. 12304 

Washington, D.C. 20530 

Tel.: (202) 514-3183 / Fax: (202) 616-8460 

Email: johnny.walker@usdoj.gov 

Counsel for Defendants 

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 17 Filed 09/22/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 776
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM GROEN
BROTHERS AVIATION, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  174,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           119,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        349,000
<PP&E>                                                  964,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          877,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        2,403,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3,210,000
<BONDS>                                                 733,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                             21,991,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (26,185,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,403,000
<SALES>                                                 126,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        126,000
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         8,723,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      199,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (8,796,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (8,796,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (8,796,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.13)


</TABLE>
Honorable Able Acosta, Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, Tx. 78711 August 26, 2015 

## RECEIVED IN I"'I"'\I lOT ()I= CRIMINAL**APPJ:Al~** 

## SEP 02

## 2015
AbelAcosta,

### Clen

Re: Disposition of Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07 Trial Court No's B93-6; B93-7 Writ# 26,094-10; 26,094-11 198th. District Court, Kerr County Texas Styled: EX PARTE ALBERT NICOLAS Dear Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas: By return mail, please advise me as soon as possible of the disposition of the above numbered Applications for Writ of Habeas Corpus that are pending in your Court. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention in this matter.

· /), /4.

## r)J~**----~----------** Albert Nicolas, Applicant C.T. Terrell Unit, 635504 1300 FM 655 Rosharon, Tx. 77583**·~;** 'f**~** -- ";•.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1171

To allow holders of unclaimed Postal Savings System certificates of deposit

to file claims for such certificates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. TOWNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Post

Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To allow holders of unclaimed Postal Savings System

certificates of deposit to file claims for such certificates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF HOLDERS OF POSTAL

4 SAVINGS SYSTEM CERTIFICATES.

5 Section 1322(c)(3) of title 31, United States Code,

6 is amended by striking ‘‘more than one’’ and all that fol7 lows through the period and inserting ‘‘after December 31,

8 1998.’’.
2

•HR 1171 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLICITY REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS.

2 (a) POLICY OF CONGRESS.—It is the policy of the

3 Congress that every individual holding unclaimed Postal

4 Savings System certificates of deposit should be able to

5 redeem those certificates. Since these certificates are more

6 than 26 years old and most of the individuals owning the

7 certificates are elderly, it is vital that information relating

8 to the ability to file claims pursuant to this Act be dissemi9 nated as widely as possible.

10 (b) PUBLICITY CAMPAIGN.—In furtherance of the

11 policy set forth in subsection (a), the Secretary of the

12 Treasury shall prepare a plan relating to the dissemina13 tion of information on the payment of claims filed pursu14 ant to this Act. The plan shall be designed so that the

15 information will reach those individuals most likely to own

16 Postal Savings System certificates of deposit. The Sec17 retary of the Treasury shall consult with representatives

18 of senior citizen organizations in the design of this plan.

19 The plan shall be put into operation no later than 6

20 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

21 SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

22 Section 1322(c) of title 31, United States Code, is

23 amended by striking paragraph (4).

Æ
#### STEVENSON v. STATE.

No. 21113.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 5, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Conviction for a misdemeanor; punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

The transcript fails to embrace a judgment of conviction. In the absence of.such judgment this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### AMMON v. DeMAYO.

No. 2083.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Jan. 31, 1941.

Shead & Smith, of Longview, for appellant.

H. P. Smead, of Longview, for appellee.

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by plaintiff, Frank De-Mayo, against Jack Ammon to recover on a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien securing the same. The trial court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for, and the defendant has appealed. The cause is before this court without having been briefed by either party. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ R. Dale Ross                                                           
|R. Dale Ross                                                               
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology
Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc.
|                                                                           
|August 14, 2007
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.

Appellate case number: 01-22-00513-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-35950

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Relators, Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C., have filed a petition 

for a writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s June 29, 2022 order denying their request to 

supersede a portion of the judgment. Relators also have filed an emergency motion for 

temporary relief, seeking to “stay enforcement and execution of the entirety of the Court’s May 

9, 2022 final judgment” pending appeal. Given that no notice of appeal has been filed in this 

Court, relators’ motion is denied.

The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from real parties in 

interest. The response if any, is due no later than Monday, August 1, 2022.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss _________

Acting individually 

Date: July 12, 2022
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J. Trump, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DONALD J. TRUMP                                                        
|Donald J. Trump Chief Executive Officer of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc.
|                                                                              
|May 13, 2005
----

Action brought on 23 April 2004 by Mühlens GmbH & Co. KG against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-150/04)

(2004/C 239/55)

Language of the case to be determined pursuant to Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure — language in which the application was submitted: German

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 23 April 2004 by Mühlens GmbH & Co. KG, Cologne (Germany) represented by T. Schulte-Beckhausen, lawyer.

Minoronzoni S.r.l., Ponte San Pietro (Bergamo), (Italy), was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of SBM Certificate Company for the year ended December 31, 1996, of our report
dated February 12, 1997, with respect to the financial statement schedules of
SBM Certificate Company included in Post Effective Amendment No. 8 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 33-38066) and related Prospectus of SBM
Certificate Company and of our report dated February 22, 1996, with respect to
the financial statement schedules of SBM Certificate Company included in Post
Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 33-38066)
and related Prospectus of SBM Certificate Company.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Louisville, Kentucky
February 26, 1997