alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Friday, July 26, 2013 Meeting July 26, 2013
Office of Justice Programs
Third floor Main Conference Room
810 7th Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
Time: 10:00 AM to 11:45 AM

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance

July 26, 2013 Meeting Materials

**Practitioner Bios**

Maura Corrigan**Presenters Bios**

Clare Anderson
	Gladys Carrion
	Robert L. Johnson
	Edward P. Mulvey**PowerPoint Presentations**

A Shared Developmental Approach: Meeting Well-Being Needs and Addressing Trauma
	Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach**OJJDP New Releases**

Online and in Print
  
Date Published: July 26, 2013
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
#### Cindy Estruch et al., Appellants, v Volkswagen AG. et al., Respondents.

Motion to dismiss cross appeal granted unless plaintiffs file the original stipulated or settled record and 14 copies thereof and 15 briefs on the appeal on or before February 19, 1991. Memorandum: An appeal is taken by service of the notice of appeal on the adverse party and by filing it in the office of the County Clerk (CPLR 5515 [1]). Here defendants served a notice of appeal but did not file it until after plaintiffs served and filed a notice of cross appeal. Thus, plaintiffs appealed first and they are required to perfect the appeal first *(see,*22 NYCRR 1000.5 [b] [5]). Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ. (Order entered Dec. 18, 1990.)
: __.;**L~** ._.:_'I ,_, -,_ ]L! UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL. AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD 

### UnauthorizedAir Transportation, Unfair andDeceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL; INC. 

### Unfair andDeceptive Practices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: October 31, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

# 13~

# ;:;-**{///~** Blane Workie Acting Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Vinh 

### Q. Nguyen
·Senior TrialAttorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-71523 Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that on this 31st day ofOctober, 2014, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle Boca Raton, Florida 33433
EXHIBIT 32.1

             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of American Natural Energy Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael K. Paulk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael K. Paulk
--------------------





Michael K. Paulk
Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2003
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3249

_____________________________
W ILMINGTON T RUST , N ATIONAL A SSOC IATION , as Trustee of ALRP Securitization Trust, Series 2015

- 1,
Appellant,

v.

S HLEZ G ROUP I NC

. , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Kevin Blazs , Judge

. July 27, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , W INOKUR , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ira Scot Silverstein of Ira Scot Silverstein, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale
, and Roy A. Diaz of SHD Legal Group P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Liana Rothstein Hood of Adams, Rothstein & Siegel, P.A., Jacksonville
, for Appellee.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Justino Vega, Appellant. *728Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 19, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Although claimant does not remember making the telephone call wherein he used abusive language to his supervisor’s wife and threatened his supervisor, claimant’s own testimony and his admission in his brief that he made "one unfortunate call” supports the conclusion that he did make the call. Also, while he argues to the contrary, claimant knew from his suspension notice that any such conduct could result in his termination; as such, the determination that this constituted misconduct warranting claimant’s disqualification from receiving unemployment insurance benefits is supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Levick [Ross],*53 AD2d 950, *appeal dismissed*42 NY2d 909, *lv denied*42 NY2d 811; *cf., Matter of Marquez [Roberts]*107 AD2d 959, 960). In addition, the record fails to support claimant’s contention that the lack of an interpreter denied him due process *(see, Matter of Rosado [Levine]*49 AD2d 782) and, in fact, it is clear from claimant’s testimony that he understood why he was terminated.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70864-70865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3295; 
Amendment #1]


State of California

    In accordance with information received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated November 9, 2000, the above-numbered 
Declaration is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing 
applications for physical damage caused by this disaster from November 
13, 2000 to November 30, 2000.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is June 14, 2001.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)


[[Page 70865]]


    Dated: November 20, 2000.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-30263 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                       545
<INVENTORY>                                     26,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,315
<PP&E>                                          39,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,320
<SALES>                                         78,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,534
<CGS>                                           47,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,098
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,908)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,908)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.91)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant To


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Deep Well Oil & Gas, Inc. (“the
Company“) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Mr.
Curtis James Sparrow, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
              January
      12, 2010By:
              /s/
      Curtis James SparrowCurtis
      James SparrowChief
      Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131929 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131929 

 COA: 270518 

Cheboygan CC: 05-003137-FH

JERRY WYMAN ALLRED, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Francis X. McCarthy, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    FRANCIS X. MCCARTHY,
JR.                                                        
|Francis X. McCarthy, Jr. Chief Financial Officer of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc.
|                                                                                       
|May 13, 2005
#### CLARK v. STATE.

No. 21181.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 30, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1940.

Shead & Smith, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was given a penalty of five years for robbery. The notice of appeal was filed on November 16, 1939. Bills of exception were filed February 17, 1940, more than ninety days thereafter. We are unable to consider the bills of exception. Floyd v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 614, 113 S.W.2d 894; Page v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 190, 117 S.W.2d 785. See C.C.P., Art. 760, sub. 5.

We find nothing fundamental in the record. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant has forwarded to this court a written communication purporting to be in his own handwriting and signed by him in which he prays for á rehearing and a reversal of the judgment of conviction. He sets out therein what- he claims are the facts in the case, but we cannot consider it as a correct statement of the facts proven upon the trial of the case for two reasons: First, because it is not approved by the trial court; and second, because it was not 'filed within the time prescribed by law.

*878On his trial appellant was represented by counsel of his own selection who, upon conviction, gave notice of appeal and who had a statement of facts made by the court reporter, but it, as well- as the bills of exception, was not filed within the time prescribed by law. Hence no questions were presented for review except the sufficiency of the indictment, and its seems to be in due and proper form.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 61 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) and Amendment No. 449 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 1, 2015
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to and in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed under Sections 13 and 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ BOB G. ALEXANDERBob G. AlexanderMarch
6, 2007
    
    
    
    President, Chief Executive
Officer and Secretary
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Worldwide Restaurant Concepts, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, A. Keith Wall, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 3, 2005 | /s/ A. Keith  Wall                          |   |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | A. Keith  Wall                              |
|                       | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Arrangements for Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 ABC Bancorp 
  
 Arrangements for Director Compensation 
 Effective as of June 1, 2005 
  
 The following schedule sets forth
the compensation payable to members of the Board of Directors of ABC Bancorp (the “Board”), effective as of June 1, 2005: 
  

	 	•	 	Each director will receive an annual retainer of $10,000, which is to be paid monthly in equal installments. 

  

	 	•	 	Each director will receive $300 for each meeting of the Board attended. 

  

	 	•	 	Each non-employee member of a committee of the Board will receive the following fees for attendance at the meetings of such committee: 

  

	 	•	 	$200 for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended. 

  

	 	•	 	$200 for each meeting of the Compensation Committee attended. 

  

	 	•	 	$200 for each meeting of the Executive and Executive Loan Committees attended. 

  

	 	•	 	$150 for each meeting of the Asset Liability Management and Investment Committees attended.
Amended Restricted Stock Grant Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.10

  
 AMENDED RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT AGREEMENT 

 
 THIS AMENDED RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT AGREEMENT (the “Amended
Agreement”) is made as of this 29th day of April 2005, between RASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“Company”) and JOHN RITTER, (“Employee”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 WHEREAS, Company and Employee entered into a certain Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) on February 23, 2004, that the parties
now desire to mutually amend as set forth below; 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in view of the foregoing recitals which are incorporated as a part of this Amended Agreement, and in consideration of the terms and conditions of this Amended Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties agree as follows: 
  
 1. Paragraph 1 and 6 of the
Agreement is amended as follows: Beginning on May 2, 2005, including the issuance on that date, all shares to be issued to Employee under the Agreement, shall be modified from an issuance of Restricted Shares outside of the Company’s 2004
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, to an issuance of Registered Shares within the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan as pre-approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. 
  
 2. Paragraph 2 is amended to delay vesting of 62,500 shares from May 1, 2005
to July 14, 2005. 
  
 3. All other provisions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent any provisions of the Agreement conflict with the provisions of this Amended Agreement, this Amended Agreement shall govern. 
  
 [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank, Signature Page to follow.] 
  









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Employee have executed this Amended Agreement effective as of the date
first set forth above. 
  

									
	 COMPANY:
	 	 	 	 EMPLOYEE:

	 	 	 	 	 
	 RASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	 	 	 	 
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Brent M. Cook
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ John Ritter

	 Its:
	 	 Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 John Ritter