alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1249 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1249

To permit Members of the House of Representatives to use their unspent 
  official allowances for college scholarships for residents of their 
    congressional districts and for reduction of the national debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1993

   Mr. Bartlett of Maryland (for himself, Mr. Armey, Mr. Blute, Mr. 
Bonilla, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Cox, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Emerson, 
 Mr. Everett, Mr. Gilcrest, Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Hoke, Mr. 
  Hunter, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. McKeon, Mrs. Morella, Mr. 
   Pombo, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Hastings, and Mrs. Maloney) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit Members of the House of Representatives to use their unspent 
  official allowances for college scholarships for residents of their 
    congressional districts and for reduction of the national debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNSPENT AMOUNTS FROM ALLOWANCES OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES TO BE AVAILABLE FOR COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPS 
              AND NATIONAL DEBT REDUCTION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, to the extent that an 
allowance of a Member of the House of Representatives is not otherwise 
used for a purpose specified by law or other authority, such allowance 
shall be available to the Member--
            (1) for college scholarships for residents of the 
        congressional district of the Member; and
            (2) for reduction of the national debt.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act--
            (1) the term ``Member of the House of Representatives'' 
        means a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident 
        Commissioner to, the Congress; and
            (2) the term ``allowance'' means, with respect to a Member 
        of the House of Representatives, the official expenses 
        allowance, the clerk hire allowance, the official mail 
        allowance, or any other official allowance of the Member.

                                 <all>
```
#### Doris Zacchia, Appellant, v Louis Zacchia, Respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated June 5, 1985, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), dated October 20, 1988, which, after a hearing, denied her application for an upward modification of the maintenance award in the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Doris Zacchia and the defendant Louis Zacchia were married in January 1946 and have two adult children. The couple separated in 1975, and the wife subsequently commenced a divorce action against the husband in September 1984. This action was settled by a stipulation dated May 17, 1985, which survived and was not merged in the ensuing judgment of divorce. Pursuant to the stipulation, the husband agreed to pay the wife a lump sum of $60,000, as well as maintenance in the sum of $150 per month until the death of either party or the wife’s remarriage.

Two and one-half years later, the wife moved for an upward *678modification of her maintenance award, alleging that she was no longer able to be self-supporting because of her poor health and lack of any marketable training and skills. Following a hearing, the Supreme Court denied her application, finding that the financial hardship claimed by the wife was self-created because she had voluntarily left her job as an employee in her husband’s concession business, and had failed to seek other employment or demonstrate the existence of a medical condition which prevented her from so doing. We affirm.

It is well settled that a party seeking to modify the maintenance provisions of a judgment of divorce in which the terms of a stipulation of settlement have been incorporated but not merged must establish that the continued enforcement of these maintenance provisions would create an "extreme hardship” *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; *Saxton v Saxton,*163 AD2d 292; *Matter of Cohen v Seletsky,*142 AD2d 111, 119-120). A party seeking the modification of an award of maintenance must additionally show that his or her loss of income was unavoidable *(see, Saxton v Saxton, supra; Battista v Battista,*132 AD2d 639; *see also, Matter of Doscher v Doscher,*80 AD2d 945, *affd*54 NY2d 655). In this case, however, the record supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the wife’s behavior was at least partially responsible for any financial hardship she was experiencing at the time of the hearing, since she had voluntarily left her employment and failed to seek another job. Moreover, although the wife’s physician testified that she might be suffering from a peptic ulcer and an underactive thyroid, the wife failed to undergo the medical testing necessary to confirm this diagnosis. Her physician further indicated that these conditions were treatable, and if successfully treated would not impair her ability to work. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the wife had failed to demonstrate her entitlement to an upward modification of maintenance. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Fiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 139 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 139

   To prohibit a Federal agency from accepting a form of individual 
 identification issued by a foreign government, except a passport that 
                 is accepted on the date of enactment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, and Armed Services, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit a Federal agency from accepting a form of individual 
 identification issued by a foreign government, except a passport that 
                 is accepted on the date of enactment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Identification Integrity Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCEPTANCE OF IDENTIFICATION ISSUED BY FOREIGN 
              GOVERNMENTS.

    (a) In General.--A Federal agency may not accept, for any official 
purpose, an identification document for an individual if the 
identification document is issued by a foreign government.
    (b) Exception.--If a passport issued by a foreign government is 
authorized by Federal law to be accepted for a specific official 
purpose on the date of the enactment of this Act, subsection (a) shall 
not be construed to affect such authorization.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``Federal 
agency'' means--
            (1) an Executive agency (as defined in section 105 of title 
        5, United States Code);
            (2) a military department (as defined in section 102 of 
        title 5, United States Code);
            (3) an office, agency, or other establishment in the 
        legislative branch of the Government of the United States;
            (4) an office, agency, or other establishment in the 
        judicial branch of the Government of the United States; and
            (5) the government of the District of Columbia.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at April 30, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Income for the
Three Months Ended April 30, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,992,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               71,459,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,122,734
<INVENTORY>                                  8,330,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            84,859,740
<PP&E>                                      26,112,985
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,921,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             163,238,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,431,683
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       176,794
<OTHER-SE>                                 112,944,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               163,238,994
<SALES>                                     24,861,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,861,327
<CGS>                                       15,128,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,064,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             479,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,224,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,250,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,974,333
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,974,333
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000943323
<NAME>                        TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS FUNDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,555
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     151,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,555
<BONDS>                                            145,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       151,555
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,619
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        
<FN>
<F1> Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other.
<F2> Includes general & administration, depreciation & amortization.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 WALL ST
NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836







| | RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2015-CCRE24 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"),
the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby
certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):



(a)  A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting
Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and



(b)  To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review,
Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







February 27, 2017



















Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Rural Programs

There are special challenges involved in operating the Summer Food Service Program (SFSP) in rural areas. During
the school year, children in rural areas are frequently bused to schools which draw attendance from a large geo-
graphic area. When school is not in session, it is far more difficult to transport these children to central locations in
rural areas for summer meals.

Because rural sites frequently have problems assembling a large number of children, financial difficulties arise from
relatively low attendance at sites. That is the primary reason that per meal administrative rates for meals served at
tural sites are slightly higher than rates for meals served at many other Program sites to recover/supplement some
of those costs. Nevertheless, sponsors of rural sites often find that this rate adjustment does not sufficient to cover
their higher costs unless they take steps to address the special challenges they face.

There are two keys to success for rural SFSPs:
* Solving the transportation problem; and eb dh ob Ag : oe
© Maintaining participation at a high enough level to é . . .

hold down per unit costs. .. Organizations that Might Operate .

a Summer Activity Program

Placement of Rural Sites

Naturaily, you want a site to be in an eligible area with e Libraries

the highest concentration of children. Although there Schools

are some successful rurai sites that do not have activity Religious Organizations
programs, a rural site is much more likely to succeed if 4-H

it is tied to a program that provides interesting activities

for the children. Boys and Girls Clubs

Town, Village, or County Recreation
Community Action Agency

Public Housing Authority / Resident
Councils

_@ Other Civic Organizations

+ Where is the need? Although school data may be
useful, an analysis of census data set is frequently
more accurate in identifying concentrations of low-
income children in rurat areas. Rural schools generally
draw children from a much farger area (sometimes, an
entire county) than you will serve at your SFSP site.
Your State agency is able to help you identify rural ar-
eas with high concentrations of unmet need.

Find out where th isti hat For more information on how to operate a Summer
ind out where there are existing programs tha Food Service Program site please visit:

attracts children. Check area organizations’ and .
facilities’ plans for summer activities for children. Or- wuew fns..usda.gov/end/surmer/ Managing. htm
ganizations which already plan to run activity programs

could be approached to either offer SFSP meals or pro-

vide activities at your meal site.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Catherine Massie, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered July 5, 1989, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

During the defendant’s plea allocution, the court made no promise to her concerning the sentence but plainly told the defendant that it would determine the sentence after receipt of the probation report. The defendant repeatedly and un*691equivocally assured the court that no promises had been made by anyone concerning the conditions of the plea. Prior to sentencing, however, the defendant sought to withdraw her plea, alleging that it was entered upon the misadvice of counsel that she would receive a sentence of probation. Because the minutes of the plea flatly refute this claim and indicate that the defendant misled the court, the application was properly denied without a hearing *(see, People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520; *People v Selikoff,*35 NY2d 227). Moreover, there is no indication in the record that the plea was otherwise improvident or baseless *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Caban,*131 AD2d 863). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/                Evan J. Warshawsky       Evan                J. WarshawskyChief                Financial Officer |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth M. Roessler,
President and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Holding Company and BWAY Corporation (the Companies) and Michael B. Clauer, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Companies for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: February 9, 2010              
|                                     
|/s/ Kenneth M. Roessler              
|Kenneth M. Roessler                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|/s/ Michael B. Clauer                
|Michael B. Clauer                    
|Executive Vice President and         
|Chief Financial Officer
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C22,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C22

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### WILLACY COUNTY WATER CONTROL & IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. ONE v. NUSSBAUM et al.

No. 11136.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 12, 1941.

Sawnie B. Smith, of Edinburg, and Smith & Nielsen, of Raymondville, for appellant.

Jesse G. Foster, and Crane & Glarner, all of Raymondville, for appellees.

MURRAY, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction restraining the appellant from moving certain property outside of Willacy County, Texas.

Appellant contends that the Criminal District Court of Willacy County was without jurisdiction to issue the temporary injunction.

This exact question was decided in appellant’s favor by the Supreme Court "of Texas, on October 29, 1941 in Ex parte W. E. Richards, Albert Hughes and M. A. Hickey, 155 S.W.2d 597, not yet published [in State Report].

Accordingly, the order granting the temporary injunction will be reversed and the cause dismissed.