alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 199 

Recognizing the 10th Anniversary of the activation of Echo Company of 

the 100th Battalion of the 442d Infantry, and the sacrifice of the 

soldiers and families in support of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 13, 2009 

Mr. SABLAN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 10th Anniversary of the activation of Echo 

Company of the 100th Battalion of the 442d Infantry, 

and the sacrifice of the soldiers and families in support 

of the United States. 

Whereas Echo Company of the 100th Battalion of the 442d 

Infantry of the United States Army was officially activated on the islands of Saipan, Tinian, and Rota and has 

been protecting the citizens of the Northern Mariana Islands since November 1998; 

Whereas the soldiers of Echo Company and their families are 

active community volunteers supporting the local community and participating in community events; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 199 IH 

Whereas Echo Company has served with great honor and distinction for two tours in Iraq in 2006–2007 and 2008– 

2009; 

Whereas Army Staff Sergeant Wilgene T. Lieto, Army SPC 

Derence W. Jack, and Army Sergeant Julian F. 

Manglona of Echo Company have paid the ultimate sacrifice for the United States; and 

Whereas Echo Company commemorates one of the original 

companies of the 100th Battalion of the 442d Infantry 

that served with distinction during World War II and 

continues to live by its motto ‘‘Go For Broke’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the valuable, historic, and contin4 ued contribution of Echo Company of the 100th 

5 Battalion of the 442d Infantry of the United States 

6 Army to the citizens of the Northern Mariana Is7 lands and the United States; 

8 (2) commends the efforts and contributions of 

9 the soldiers and sacrifices of the families of Echo 

10 Company to the United States; 

11 (3) recognizes and reaffirms the commitment of 

12 Congress to support the mission of Echo Company; 

13 and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 199 IH 

1 (4) honors the lives of the soldiers of Echo 

2 Company who gave the ultimate sacrifice on behalf 

3 of the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.6A





EMPLOYEES SUBJECT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS





The Company has entered into
employment agreements with certain executive officers. These agreements are identical except for the date of execution, the name and title of the particular officer involved, and that officers minimum base salary. In July 1997, the Company
entered into employment agreements with Michael Mack, Chief Executive Officer and President, David Qualls, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Gregory Keller, Vice President of Operations. On November 17, 1998 the Company entered into an
employment agreement with Kenneth Keane, Vice President of Human Resources. On July 22, 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Walter Carucci, Vice President of Development and Construction. Under the respective employment
agreements, the minimum base annual salary for Mr. Mack is $250,000, for Mr. Qualls is $170,000, for Mr. Carucci is $160,000, for Mr. Keller is $150,000 and for Mr. Keane is $120,000.
(logo) CWCapital

         ASSET MANAGEMENT 

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015

 

 

GSMS 2015-GC32

 

 

In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the Cypresswood Court Shopping Center Mortgage Loan requirements detailed in §10.07 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A) a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and;

 

(B) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone 

President

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814 

www.cwcapital.com
Agenda

August 7, 2014

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

2:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. Welcome and Introduction - Michael T. McRaith, 

Director, Federal Insurance Office, U.S. Department 

of the Treasury

2:15 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. Review of the Renewed Charter and Bylaws and 

Operating Procedures of the Federal Advisory 

Committee on Insurance

• Presentation of the Renewed Charter of the 

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

• Presentation of the Bylaws and Operating 

Procedures of the Federal Advisory Committee 

on Insurance

2:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. Discussion by FACI Members on Areas of Interest

3:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Discussion of Federal Insurance Office’s Report, 

How to Modernize and Improve the System of 

Insurance Regulation in the United States

4:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. International Developments - Status Report

5:00 p.m. Adjourn
July 30, 2015

Mr. Miguel S. De Felice

Aero Images LLC

1431 Capri Lane #5202

Weston, FL 33326

Dear Mr. De Felice:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 4, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1489), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 4.1


 


MW Bancorp, Inc.


2110 Beechmont Avenue


Cincinnati, OH 45230


 


September 25, 2015


 


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, DC 20549


 


		Re:	MW Bancorp, Inc. – Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015



 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


MW Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("MWBC"),
is today filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 (the "Form 10-K"), as executed
on September 25, 2015.


 


Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item
601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, MWBC hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements
defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not
being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. No such instrument represents long-term debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of
MWBC and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


 


	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 
	/s/ Gregory P. Niesen	 
	Gregory P. Niesen	 
	President and CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6308

TYRELL DAVRON ANDERSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA; LISA HARDY; CARIE BLAND; THE

BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge.

(CA-04-4071-AMD)

Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrell Davron Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tyrell Davron Anderson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Anderson v. Maryland, No. CA-04-4071-AMD (D. Md. filed Jan. 28,

2005 & entered Jan. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 2 of 20 PageID 2
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 3 of 20 PageID 3
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 4 of 20 PageID 4
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 5 of 20 PageID 5
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 6 of 20 PageID 6
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 7 of 20 PageID 7
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 8 of 20 PageID 8
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 9 of 20 PageID 9
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 10 of 20 PageID 10
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 11 of 20 PageID 11
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 12 of 20 PageID 12
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 13 of 20 PageID 13
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 14 of 20 PageID 14
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 15 of 20 PageID 15
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 16 of 20 PageID 16
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 17 of 20 PageID 17
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 18 of 20 PageID 18
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 19 of 20 PageID 19
Case 3:22-cr-00263-K Document 1 Filed 07/06/22 Page 20 of 20 PageID 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FORM 10-Q OF PRESIDIO  CAPITAL CORP. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         102,627
<SECURITIES>                                    23,040
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,510
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 188,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   188,510
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### GOSSETT, Banking Commissioner, et al., v. SCOFIELD et al.

No. 2245.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

June 6, 1940.

Morrow & Calvert, of Hillsboro, for plaintiffs in error.

■ Frazier & Averitte, of Hillsboro, for defendants in error.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing plaintiffs’ suit. The record discloses that the entry of the order of dismissal was not made at the request of either party, nor because of any lack of prosecution, but because of certain alleged equities in favor of the defendants, of which the trial judge claimed to be familiar, but which were not disclosed by him at the time of the entry of the order. To be more specific, the trial judge seems to have been of the opinion that the plaintiff banking commissioner had failed to properly and timely prosecute suits against others who were indebted to the defunct bank, whose assets were being administered by him, and that, by reason thereof, he should not be permitted to maintain this suit against these defendants, who were also alleged to be indebted to said bank. None of these so-called equities were disclosed at the time the order of dismissal was entered.

In the first place, the alleged equities, if shown, would not have justified the dismissal of the suit; and in the second place, no proof was made of the existence of such alleged equities at the time the order of dismissal was entered. In the case of Barrow, Wade, Guthrie & Co. v. Stroud, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 365, we held that a trial judge was not authorized to take into consideration facts concealed within the secret recesses of his bosom and not shown by the record or otherwise disclosed at the trial in determining whether or not an order of dismissal should be- entered. Such procedure, if permitted, would allow a trial judge to arbitrarily dismiss a suit without any reasonable opportunity on the part of the injured party to show on appeal that the trial judge had abused his discretion.

*467We are of the opinion that there were no facts before the trial court that authorized the dismissal of the suit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the periods                indicated. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November                  13, 2007  |   | /s/ Kang                Yihua           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                      |   | Kang                Yihua                    |   |
|                                                      |   | Chief                Executive Officer       |   |
|                                                      |   | (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |

----
Exhibit






AMENDMENT ONE
TO
FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


As of September 28, 2015


This Amendment One (“Amendment”) hereby amends that certain Fifth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of October 22, 2013, between Robert Mehrabian and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (the “Employment Agreement”) as follows:


		
	1.
	 The “Term” of the Employment Agreement shall be effective as of the date first above written and shall continue in effect through December 31, 2019.


		
	2.
	Since January 1, 2015, the term “Base Salary” for the purpose of the Employment Agreement has been $955,000 (Nine Hundred and Fifty Five Thousand Dollars).  The Executive’s Base Salary may be increased from time to time in the future as approved by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.


		
	3.
	Executive’s address for the purpose of notices under Section 8 of the Employment Agreement shall be 578 W. Potrero Road, Thousand Oaks, CA  91361.




Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition have the meanings given to such terms in the Employment Agreement.


Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.


Witness the due execution hereof, intending to be legally bound, as of the date first above written.


	
		
	Executive    
	Teledyne Technologies Incorporated



	 
	 

	  /s/ Robert Mehrabian                
	By:   /s/ Charles Crocker                      

	Robert Mehrabian    
	Charles Crocker

	 
	Chair, Personnel and Compensation Committee
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 7, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128131 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. KEVIN MACLACHLAN, Personal Representative Stephen J. Markman, of the Estate of DAVID MACLACHAN, Justices Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128131 COA: 252221 Ingham CC: 02-001949-NI CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and JOHN DOE, Defendants,

and

CITY OF LANSING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we
direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory acti on permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among
the issues to be addressed at oral argument whether th e Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's conclusion that defendant City of La nsing was entitled to summary disposition based on government al immunity. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatement of argum ents in application papers.

s1003 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 7, 2005

Clerk
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 308 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of 

3 the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, when the 

4 House adjourns on any legislative day from Thursday, 

5 July 29, 2010, through Tuesday, August 3, 2010, on a 

6 motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by 

7 its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
2 

•HCON 308 EH 

1 until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, September 14, 2010, or until 

2 the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this 

3 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

4 SEC. 2. (a) The Speaker or her designee, after con5 sultation with the Minority Leader of the House, shall no6 tify the Members of the House to reassemble at such place 

7 and time as she may designate if, in her opinion, the pub8 lic interest shall warrant it. 

9 (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), 

10 when the House adjourns on a motion offered pursuant 

11 to this subsection by its Majority Leader or his designee, 

12 the House shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the 

13 first section of this concurrent resolution. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 308 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the 

House of Representatives.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of PACE Health Management Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pappajohn, Director and Acting Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |                                                      | /s/   John Pappajohn | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | 
| |                                                     
| | John PappajohnDirector and Acting CEOAugust 12, 2004 |                     

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by PACE
Health Management Systems, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

12

---