alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00210-CR

Donald Kenneth Mitchell, Appellant 

v.

State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 77434, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Donald Kenneth Mitchell seeks to appeal his December 7, 2017 judgment of

conviction. The thirty-day deadline for perfecting the appeal was January 8, 2018, and the deadline

for seeking an extension of time to file the notice of appeal was January 22, 2018. See Tex. R. App.

P. 4.1, 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. However, Mitchell did not file his notice of appeal until March 22, 2018,

and he did not seek an extension of time to file his notice of appeal until May 6, 2018.

Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this purported appeal in

any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519,

522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (concluding that when belated notice of appeal is filed without

timely motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal, appellate court must dismiss purported

appeal for lack of jurisdiction); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.
1998) (holding that amendments to rules of appellate procedure did not affect Olivo’s rationale

requiring timely notice of appeal to vest appellate court with jurisdiction).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.1

_________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 12, 2018

Do Not Publish

 Mitchell’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is dismissed as moot. 1

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003 and as amended by Form 10-Q/A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Scott D. Kantor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      February 9, 2004                             /s/ Scott D. Kantor
      ----------------                                ----------------
                                                       Scott D. Kantor
                                                       Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John P. Burke, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                                       
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN P. BURKE                                                                                                     
|                       |  |  |  | John P. Burke                                                                                                         
|                       |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Treasurer of Trump Entertainment Resorts
Funding, Inc.
FILED

January 11, 1999

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

LINDA S. SEALS, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellee, )

)

v. ) NO. 03S01-9704-CH-00044

)

ENGLAND/CORSAIR UPHOLSTERY )

MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant/Appellant, )

)

DINA TOBIN, DIRECTOR OF )

THE DIVISION OF WORKERS’ )

COMPENSATION, TENNESSEE )

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, )

SECOND INJURY FUND, )

)

Defendant/Appellee. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the majority's decision to remand this case to the trial court for

a determination as to the extent of the worker's vocational disability attributable

to the worker's subsequent physical and mental disabilities. I continue to adhere

to my dissent in Bomely v. Mid America Corp., 970 S.W.2d 929 (Tenn. 1998), in

which I concluded that Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a) is applicable when there

is a subsequent injury and the employee is rendered permanently and totally

disabled. Subsection (b), however, should apply only when the employee is still

able to earn a wage or be gainfully employed but has received compensable

vocational disabilities that exceed 100 percent or 400 weeks of compensation.

Janice M. Holder, Justice
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 250 

Congratulating the people of Iraq on their resolve to vote in a national 

parliamentary election on March 7, 2010, in the face of adversity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2010 

Mr. BAIRD (for himself and Mr. INGLIS) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the people of Iraq on their resolve to vote 

in a national parliamentary election on March 7, 2010, 

in the face of adversity. 

Whereas the people of Iraq held a national parliamentary 

election on March 7, 2010; 

Whereas insurgent terrorists vowed to disrupt the election 

with a concerted wave of attacks; 

Whereas there were a number of explosions in Iraq just before the polls opened; 

Whereas Iraqis went to the polls defying the violence to demonstrate their commitment to democracy; and 

Whereas the people of the United States respect and admire 

the people of Iraq for their courage and bravery: Now, 

therefore, be it 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 250 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress congratulates the people of 

3 Iraq on their resolve to vote in a national parliamentary 

4 election on March 7, 2010, in the face of adversity. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, S. Leslie Flegel, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Source Interlink Companies, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Source Interlink Companies, Inc.

Date: December 12, 2005

                                          /s/ S. LESLIE FLEGEL
                                          -------------------------------
                                          S. LESLIE FLEGEL
                                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 1 of 14   PageID 215

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 2 of 14   PageID 216

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 3 of 14   PageID 217

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 4 of 14   PageID 218

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 5 of 14   PageID 219

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 6 of 14   PageID 220

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 7 of 14   PageID 221

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 8 of 14   PageID 222

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 9 of 14   PageID 223

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 10 of 14   PageID 224

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 11 of 14   PageID 225

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 12 of 14   PageID 226

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 13 of 14   PageID 227

Case 3:22-cv-01529-N   Document 28   Filed 08/23/24    Page 14 of 14   PageID 228
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William C. Stone, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Not Applicable;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

    Date: November 8, 2004              By:/s/ William C. Stone

                                        William C. Stone
                                        Chief Executive Officer
NCTSN Website.

peares ne Ts
Find current information ahout’ child tenn iypes '
“Search trauma-informed resources
‘Déwnload over.200 Network products
Access the Military Families
Knowledge Rank i

‘View child trauma information
Bott ‘Espatial :

wwin NCTEN.org :

The National Child
Traumatic Stress Network

“he NCTSN is a unique, collaborative network
that brings together leading experts in child
trauma, frontline providers, and families to
advance the quality of care and move
scientific gains quickly

into practice.


The NCTSN sewage Banki isa collaborative
toal and showcase for Network expertise:

ta the pre ducts, projects; j
Imnowledge of the Network. Revisit eften for
new w SEYeepnets and Bpeated mater fale:

i, profession Is,
See meet and
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Young, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered February 25, 1987, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the defendant’s conviction of grand larceny in the third degree to petit larceny, and vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the People’s concession that the defendant’s conviction of grand larceny in the third degree should be reduced to petit larceny *(see, People v Behlog,*74 NY2d 237). Since the defendant has already served the maximum period to which he could have been sentenced on a conviction for petit larceny, there is no need to remit the matter for resentencing *(see, People v Cromwell,*150 AD2d 715). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Deep Well Oil & Gas, Inc. (“the
      Company“) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Curtis
      Sparrow, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      April 21, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Curtis SparrowCurtis
                Sparrow
              Chief
                  Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1354 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1354

   To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to require 
 States to have laws that would permit a parent who is chronically ill 
  or near death to name a standby guardian for a minor child without 
                     surrendering parental rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1993

 Mrs. Maloney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to require 
 States to have laws that would permit a parent who is chronically ill 
  or near death to name a standby guardian for a minor child without 
                     surrendering parental rights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Standby Guardianship Act''.

SEC. 2. STATES REQUIRED TO HAVE STANDBY GUARDIANSHIP LAW AS A CONDITION 
              OF ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR FOSTER CARE AND 
              ADOPTION ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Part E of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 670-679) is amended by inserting after section 477 the 
following:

``SEC. 478. STANDBY GUARDIANSHIP LAWS AND PROCEDURES.

    ``To be eligible for payments under this part, a State must have in 
effect laws and procedures that permit any parent who is chronically 
ill or near death, without surrendering parental rights, to designate a 
standby guardian for the parent's minor children, whose authority would 
take effect upon--
            ``(1) the death of the parent;
            ``(2) the mental incapacity of the parent; or
            ``(3) the physical debilitation and consent of the 
        parent.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect at the end of the first calendar quarter that begins 60 or 
more months after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 
apply to payments under part E of title IV of the Social Security Act 
for the quarter and payments made under such part for any succeeding 
quarter.

                                 <all>
```
Calendar No. 243

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345

[Report No. 103–162]

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 280

and Federal Building’’.‘‘Robert F. Peckham United States CourthouseSouth First Street in San Jose, California, as the

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 243

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345

[Report No. 103–162]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 5 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Reported by Mr. BAUCUS, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 280 South

First Street in San Jose, California, as the ‘‘Robert

F. Peckham United States Courthouse and Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 280 South First

5 Street in San Jose, California, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Robert F. Peckham United States Court7 house and Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 1345 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Robert F. Peckham United States

6 Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### FREEMAN v. STATE.

No. 19787.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1938.

Robert P. Brown, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for the theft of chickens, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for eighteen months. .

The record is before us without statement of facts. There are three bills of ex*76ception brought forward, one complaining of the action of the court 'in refusing to grant a continuance for absent witnesses; and another complaining because the court declined to direct a peremptory verdict of acquittal. It is apparent that the matters complained of in these bills can not be appraised in the absence of the statement of facts. Another bill complains of the charge on circumstantial evidence. We find no basis for the criticism directed at said instruction.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 3:22-cv-01530-S-BK Document 17 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 410
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 23, 2023

NO. 03-20-00138-CR

Danielle Leigh Edwards, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED IN PART;

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART ON REMAND –

OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the portion of the

judgment finding guilt that requires reversal. However, there was error in that portion of the

judgment that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to

reflect a conviction for the state-jail felony offense of endangering a child. The trial court’s 

judgment of conviction, as modified, is affirmed. However, the Court reverses the portion of the 

judgment imposing sentence and remands the case to the trial court for a new punishment

hearing on the lesser-included offense. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
exv10w3



 




Exhibit 10.3


Lamar Advertising Company

Non-Management Director Compensation Plan

(effective October 1, 2004)




Director Fees




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Recipient	 	Annual Fee	 	Payment Schedule
	Each non-management director
	 	$	36,000	*	 	monthly
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Each
director who serves on at least one Committee of the Board
of Directors
	 	$	9,000	 	 	quarterly
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Chair of the Audit Committee
	 	$	9,000	 	 	quarterly
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Chair of Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Governance
Committee1
	 	$	4,500	 	 	quarterly





*Non-management directors are also reimbursed for travel expenses incurred to attend board and
committee meetings and expenses incurred to perform other, related responsibilities.




Stock Options




      At the discretion our Compensation Committee, our independent, non-management directors may
also receive option grants from time to time.









	1	The same director currently serves as chair of both committees.