alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 0245

Directorate Identifier: 2014NM135AD

747

- 21A2523 , R1

--- 10 / 3/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included i n FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 10.12

                       Interactive Technologies.com, Ltd.
                         110 East Atlantic Ave Suite 400
                           Delray Beach, Florida 33444

                                          June 7, 2000

Mr. John T. Moran
Boru Enterprises, Inc.
72 S.E. 6th Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida  33483

Dear Mr. Moran:

In consideration for our issuance to you of the enclosed option to purchase
400,000 shares of our common stock, you hereby agree to cancel the attached
agreement, dated January 27, 2000, pertaining to our obligation to pay
compensation to you in our PIPE transaction.

Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing, and your receipt of the
enclosed option, by executing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter,

Very truly yours,

Interactive Technologies.com, Ltd.


By:_______________________________
       William R. Becker, CEO

Agreed:

Boru Enterprises, Inc.


By:_______________________________
      John T. Moran, President
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Patrick J. Pedonti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: November 14, 2002               By:/s/ Patrick J. Pedonti

                                      Patrick J. Pedonti
                                      Chief Financial Officer
exv10w33



 








EXHIBIT 10.33




Summary of 2005 Cash Bonus Plan



All eligible employees, including executive officers, of the Company may receive performance-based
compensation based upon the Company’s achievement of certain goals, including achievement of
specified non-GAAP operating income targets and software license bookings targets. One half of the
aggregate bonus pool available for employees will be attributable to achievement of each of the two
goals. The amount of the bonus pool that an individual employee may receive is based upon a
percentage of the individual’s base salary and varies by position. Awards under the 2005 Cash Bonus
Plan will be accrued quarterly and paid semiannually.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DIEGO GUTIERREZ PINALES, §

 #41066-279, § 

MOVANT, § 

 § 

V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:22-CV-2152-N-BK 

 § (CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3:18-CR-519-N-19) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § 

RESPONDENT. § 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in 

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, 

conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2023. 

____________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-02152-N-BK Document 11 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 76
#### REYNOLDS v. STATE.

No. 22112.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1942.

Joe Bailey Morris, of Dallas, for appellant.

*1087Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder with malice, and his punishment assessed at thirty-five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The motion for a new trial contains matters alleged to be errors committed upon the trial of this cause, which we are unable to correctly appraise on account of the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exceptions.

All proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 21790.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 22, 1941.

Frank M. Harrell, of San Saba, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Beli, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a statutory offense and given a life imprisonment, as the penalty, the victim being his daughter who was under fifteen years of age.

There are no bills of exception in the record and no brief filed in behalf of appellant. It does not appear upon what question a reversal is sought. No evidence was introduced in behalf of appellant and there is no denial of the testimony given by the daughter against her father. Although it is very unsatisfactory, it is sufficient upon which a jury may return their verdict, and no question is presented for this court. Consequently, it is not within its power to disturb the verdict which the jury returned.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James M. Kevra, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Midland Cogeneration Venture
Limited Partnership;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: February 25, 2005 /s/ James M. Kevra
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MADISON A. NEWELL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS 

HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER 

WILLED BODY PROGRAM,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00938-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Notice of Withdrawal and Unopposed Motion to Dismiss 

Complaint (ECF No. 21), filed June 16, 2023. The Motion is hereby GRANTED. This lawsuit is 

hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED this 14th day of July, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00938-O Document 22 Filed 07/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 94
SERVED DECEMBER 5, 2012 

U.S. DEP~=~~im~~~RTATI@,'t~'~![~i~}~~hl'l WASHINGTON, DC 

In The Matter Of: 

SOUTHERN AIR SERVICES 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0784 

Case No. 2011-S0-15-0086 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On December 5, 2012, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA), filed a Withdrawal of Complaint. The FAA's Withdrawal of Complaint stated 

that the FAA and the Respondent, Southern Air Services, had reached a settlement and 

that the FAA was withdrawing its Complaint dated July, 2012. There is a December 11, 

2012 Ru1e 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference currently set in this matter. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1) The December 11, 2012 Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, set for 

11:00am EST, is cancelled. 

2) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), has Withdrawn its Complaint dated July, 2012, and 

this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

· Southern Region 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: . 404-305-5223 

Mr. Charles s.· lnderwiesen 

Lay Representative 

Southern Air Services 

24510 State Road 64 East 

Myakka City, FLA 34251 

TEL: 941-812-7032 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0784 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### Robert Eller, Respondent, v Hyala Eller, Also Known as Esther Shapiro, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action for the partition of certain real property, the defendant Hyala Eller appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), entered July 3, 1989, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to partition, and appointing a Referee to ascertain the rights of the parties in the property. The notice of appeal from a decision dated March 24, 1989, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order *(see,*CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff and the defendant Hyala Eller (hereinafter the defendant) were once husband and wife who held the title to *415the property which is the subject of this action as tenants by the entirety. They were divorced in 1971, thus transforming their ownership to that of tenants in common *(see, Ripp v Ripp,*38 AD2d 65, *affd*32 NY2d 755). Litigation, primarily but not exclusively over custody of the children, continued for years thereafter. The defendant took possession of the premises in 1979 and the plaintiff commenced this action for partition *(see,*RPAPL art 9) in 1988. By her answer, the defendant asserted as an affirmative defense that the plaintiff has unclean hands. She also counterclaimed for a determination that she acquired full title to the property by adverse possession *(see,*RPAPL art 5).

Neither the litigious nature of the parties’ relationship nor the plaintiff’s allegedly wrongful conduct with respect to their children has a direct bearing on the subject matter of this litigation and neither can serve as a basis for defeating the plaintiff’s right to seek partition *(see, Cohn & Berk v Rothman-Goodman Mgt. Corp.,*125 AD2d 435, 436; *see also, Agati v Agati,*59 NY2d 830). Moreover, the record makes clear that the defendant cannot prove a claim of adverse possession *(see,*RPAPL 541; CPLR 212 [a]; *Perkins v Volpe,*146 AD2d 617). We therefore agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant failed to demonstrate the existence of triable issues of fact sufficient to defeat the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. We have also considered the remaining contentions and find them either to be without merit or not properly preserved for appellate review *(see, Kartinganer*As*socs. v Town of New Windsor,*132 AD2d 527). Bracken, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00145-CV 4397226 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/6/2015 11:07:17 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-13-002356 Filed in The District Court of Travis County, Texas 

## MAR 04 2015
MARK WALTERS, Plaintiff 

### § § § § § § § At M. Velva L. Price, District Clerk IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
v. BRAD LIVINGSTON, Defendant. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

TO: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN CLERK'S RECORD ON APPEAL Velva Price, Clerk ofthe District Court ofTravis County, Texas 1000 Guadalupe St Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (512) 854-9457 Fax: (512) 854-9549 FROM: Mark Walters, PlaintiffPro Se in the above styled and numbered cause. 

### RE: Plaintiffs request for documents to be included in the clerk's record for Mark Walters, ET. AI. v. Brad Livingston, cause number D-1-GN-13- 002356 in the 200111 Judicial Court ofTravis County, Texas.
Plaintiff , Mark Walters, is appealing this case to the Third Court of Appeals
. The trial court signed the final judgment in this case on February 6, 2015
. Plaintiff filed a notice ofappeal on March 4, 2015 and is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk's fee. Plaintiff requests that the following documents be included in the clerk's record, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5 (a) : 1. Plaintiffs Original Petition filed July 11 , 20 13. 2. Plaintiffs Second Amended Petition filed September 15 ,2014. 3. Defendant's Original Answer filed July 29, 2013. 4
. Defendant's Amended Answer filed August 27, 2013. 5. Defendant's Second Amended Answer filed October 7, 2014. 6. Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction filed July 15 , 2014.7. Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed on August 23 , 2014. 8. Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction filed
on July 28, 2014. 9. The court's order denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Plea to the Jurisdiction, signed on July 31 , 2014. 10. The court's amended order denying Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction, signed on July 31,2014. 11. Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment filed on November 13, 2014. 12. Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summa ry Judgment, filed on December 11,2014. 13. The court'sjudgment signed February 6, 2015
. 14. Plaintiff's notice ofappeal dated March 4, 2015. 15. Plaintiff's request for preparation of the reporter's record dated March 4, 2015
. 16. Plaintiffs request for preparation ofthe clerk' s record dated March 4, 2015
. 17. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis f ile March 4, 2015. 18. The court's docket sheet. 19. The certified bill ofcosts.

2Respectfully submitted,

Mark Walters P.O. Box 28078 Austin, Texas 78755 (512)-964-4343 verusconsultingtexas @ gmail.com Plaintiff Pro Se

3

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Mark Walters, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing REQUEST FOR CLERK' S RECORD ON APPEAL, has been served by hand delivering on March 4, 2015, to: Craig Jacobs, Assistant Attorney General C/o Texas Attorney General P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548

4 Mark Walters
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000942378
<NAME>                        THCG, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1.00
<CASH>                                               4,226
<SECURITIES>                                         6,203
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                           100
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    13,032
<PP&E>                                                 210
<DEPRECIATION>                                          10
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      60,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,207
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               127
<OTHER-SE>                                          56,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        60,016
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    16,506
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                           506
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                      (4,347)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (3,588)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.23)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1385 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1385

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
  allow formula grants to be used to prosecute persons driving while 
                              intoxicated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1993

  Mr. Schiff introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
  allow formula grants to be used to prosecute persons driving while 
                              intoxicated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION.

    Section 501(b) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 is amended--
            (1) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (21) and 
        adding ``; and''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(22) programs for the prosecution of driving while 
        intoxicated and the enforcement of other laws relating to 
        alcohol use and the operation of motor vehicles.''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from form
10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000943820
<NAME>                        Sitel Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         16,277
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,740
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,564
<PP&E>                                         215,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                 94,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 408,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,731
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       65
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   408,944
<SALES>                                        164,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,185
<CGS>                                          88,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (63)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (203)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,483)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        

</TABLE>