alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1377 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1377

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand veteran eligibility 
 for reimbursement by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for emergency 
    treatment furnished in a non-Department facility, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2009

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand veteran eligibility 
 for reimbursement by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for emergency 
    treatment furnished in a non-Department facility, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF VETERAN ELIGIBILITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT BY 
              SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT 
              FURNISHED IN A NON-DEPARTMENT FACILITY.

    (a) Expansion of Eligibility.--Section 1725 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(3)(C), by striking ``or in part''; 
        and
            (2) in subsection (f)(2), by striking subparagraph (E).
    (b) Limitations on Reimbursement.--Subsection (c) of such section 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(4)(A) If the veteran has contractual or legal recourse against a 
third party that would only, in part, extinguish the veteran's 
liability to the provider of the emergency treatment, and payment for 
the treatment may be made both under subsection (a) and by the third 
party, the amount payable for such treatment under such subsection 
shall be the amount by which the costs for the emergency treatment 
exceed the amount payable or paid by the third party, except that the 
amount payable may not exceed the maximum amount payable established 
under paragraph (1)(A).
    ``(B) In any case in which a third party is financially responsible 
for part of the veteran's emergency treatment expenses, the Secretary 
shall be the secondary payer.
    ``(C) A payment in the amount payable under subparagraph (A) shall 
be considered payment in full and shall extinguish the veteran's 
liability to the provider.
    ``(D) The Secretary may not reimburse a veteran under this section 
for any copayment or similar payment that the veteran owes the third 
party or for which the veteran is responsible under a health-plan 
contract.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply with respect to emergency treatment furnished on or after 
October 8, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-18-00210- CR
Donald Kenneth Mitchell, Appellant

v. State of Texas, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 774 34, H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Do n ald Kenne th Mitchell seeks to appea l his Dec ember 7, 2017 judgmen t o f conviction. The thirty -day deadline for perf ecting the appea l was J anuar y 8, 2018, and the deadline for seeking an extension of time to file the notice of appea l was J anuar y 22, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1, 26.2(a)( 1), 26.3. Howe ver, Mitche ll did not file hi s notice of a ppeal until Marc h 22, 2018, and he did not see k an extension of time to file his notice of appe al until May 6, 2018. Under the circ umstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this purported appea l in any manner other than by dismiss ing it for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522-23 (T ex . Crim. App. 1996) (conc luding that when belated notice of appea l is filed without timely motion for extension of time to file notice of appea l, appellate court must dismiss purported appea l for lack of jurisdiction); see also Slaton v. State , 981 S.W .2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.1998) (holding that am en d m ents to rules of appellate proce dure did not aff ect Olivo ’s rationale requiring timely

notice of a

ppeal to vest a

ppellate c ourt with jurisdiction). The a ppeal is dismissed for wa nt of jurisdiction. 1

_________________________________________ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Field Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: June 12, 2018 Do Not Publish

Mitchell’s motion for extension of tim e to file a ppellant’s brie f is dismiss ed as moot. 1 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William C. Brown, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel merely because the codefendant’s attorney appeared for defendant at his arraignment. Defendant was fully apprised of the potential conflict of interest caused by the joint representation and consented to counsel’s appear*995anee *(see, People v Recupero,*73 NY2d 877, 878-879; *People v McDonald,*68 NY2d 1, 8-9, *rearg dismissed*69 NY2d 724). Defendant has failed to demonstrate that "a significant possibility of a conflict of interest existed bearing a substantial relationship to the conduct of the defense” and he has not pointed to facts suggesting "that the potential for conflict actually operated” *(People v Recupero, supra,*at 879).

Further, we find that defendant’s subsequent counsel provided meaningful representation and therefore defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.— criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, 
November 29, 2000, 1 p.m. to November 29, 2000, 3 p.m., NIEHS, 79 T.W. 
Alexander Drive, Building 4401, Conference Room 3446, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709 which was published in the Federal Register on October 
19, 2000, FR 203:62741.
    The telephone conference call meeting will be held on January 16, 
2001, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. at the same location, instead of November 
29, 2000, as previously advertised. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: November 17, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30176 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Ka 'Ohana 0 Kalaupapa Board ofDirectors
Clarence "Boogie" Kahilihiwa President
Pauline Ahulau Chow Vice President
Pauline Ka'iulani Puahala Hess Treasurer
MakiaMalo

Director
Gloria Marks

Director
Mark Ellis Director
Glenn Harada

Director
Sol Kaho'ohalahala Director
Colette Machado Director
Charmaine Woodward Director
Sister Davilyn Ah Chick, OSF Director
Patrick Boland

Director
Valerie Monson Coordinator and Secretary ... To Honor and To Perpetuate"
October28, 2013 Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseys Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Order 2013-10-3, servicing Kalaupapa, Hawaii Sent via email and US Mail Aloha ChiefSchlemmer, Ka 'Ohana 0 Kalaupapa is a 501-c-3 nonprofit organization made up of Kalaupapa residents, family members, descendants and longtime friends of the community. Our mission is to advocate for the needs of residents, develop educational programs for the public, help descendants learn abouttheir ancestors atKalaupapa and workin collaboration for the preservation of this importanthistory. I am writing onbehalf ofthe 'Ohana Board ofDirectors regarding Order2013-10-3, servicing Kalaupapa, Hawaii, to respectfully askthat Makani Kai Airlinesbe granted the Essential Air Service contract to continue offering air service to Kalaupapa. For the past two years, Makani Kai has provided exceptional service to the Kalaupapa community, their family members who wish to visit them and others who want to travel to this remote peninsula thathas played such a large partin the history of Hawaii. Airfares are affordable, the service providedby the pilots and staffis outstanding and the administration works closely with the Kalaupapa community to make sure the schedule meets the needs of residents. Dependable and affordable air travel is essential for those ofus atKalaupapa where we live in a peninsula accessible onlyby a horse trail down a steep, 3-mile clifforby small airplanes. We rely on air travel for medical appointments, personal business trips, family visits and general shopping. During the pasttwoyears, I can'tremember a single complaint aboutMakani Kai Airlines- an amazing accomplishmentin the air industry. Please grant the Essential AirService for Kalaupapa commencingJanuary 1, 2014, to Makani Kai Airlines to enable them to continue providing this important service to the Kalaupapa community and those who wish to visit. Respectfully, 

## I

## V~<€/~ ftJr Clarence Kahilihiwa President

P.0. Box 1111 Kalaupapa, Hawai'i 96742 

### www .kalaupapaohana.org
1 The Honorable James G. Mixon, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1607

___________ Richard L. Cox, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the Eighth Circuit. Barbara Griffin, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 25, 2006 Filed: April 27, 2006

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Barbara Griffin, the wife of debtor St ephen Griffin, appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BA P) affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 judgment in favor of the court-appointed trustee, Richard Cox. Upon review of the bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error, and its legal conc lusions de novo, see In re Vote , 276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2002) (standards of review), we agree with the BAP that the bankruptcy court properly avoided post-petition payments totaling-2- $65,000 to Barbara Griffin, avoided as to the trustee her recording of a quitclaim deed, and declared that the prenuptial agreemen t between Barbara and Stephen Griffin did not effect a present transfer of the real property at issue. We therefore affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW141441]

Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW141441 for lands in Lincoln County, Wyoming, was timely filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date of termination.

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively.                

                    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $158 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW 141441 effective September 1, 2000, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Pamela J. Lewis,

Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.

[FR Doc. 00-30185  Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-M
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kerri-Ann Millar, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Cue Biopharma, Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

Date: April 30, 2019 

 
     Cue Biopharma, Inc. By: /s/ Kerri-Ann Millar  Kerri-Ann Millar  Vice President, Finance  (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)**
#### E. J. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Jesus MIRELES, Appellee.

No. 11046.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 12, 1941.

G. H. Russell, of San Antonio, for appellant.

William Molsa and Theo. E. Simmang, both of San Antonio, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion on authority of Moore v. Eckols, Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W.2d 1014.
ex4-1.htm


Exhibit 4.1

 

CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE

OF

SERIES J CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

OF

LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION

 




 

Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the

General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

 




 

Lighting Science Group Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “Corporation”) DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

 

That pursuant to the authority expressly granted and vested in the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”) by the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, the Board has adopted the following resolutions increasing the number of authorized shares of Series J Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series J Preferred Stock”) of the Corporation:

 

RESOLVED, that pursuant to the Certificate of Designation of Series J Convertible Preferred Stock of the Corporation (as amended from time to time, the “Series J Certificate of Designation”), the Corporation was authorized to issue 70,000 shares of Series J Preferred Stock as a series of the Corporation’s authorized Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share; and, be it

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority expressly granted and vested in the Board in accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series J Preferred Stock, as required by the Series J Certificate of Designation, the number of shares of Preferred Stock of the Corporation designated as Series J Preferred Stock be, and hereby is, increased from 70,000 shares to 85,100 shares; and, be it 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the Chief Executive Officer and the Secretary of the Corporation be and hereby are authorized and directed in the name and on behalf of the Corporation to execute and file a Certificate (the “Certificate of Increase”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware increasing the number of shares constituting the Series J Preferred Stock from 70,000 shares to 85,100 shares and to take any and all other actions deemed necessary or appropriate to effectuate this resolution; and, be it

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that any officer of the Corporation be, and each hereby is, authorized and directed for and in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation to prepare, file and deliver any and all notices or other filings that may be required by applicable law, the Series J Certificate of Designation or the Certificate of Increase.

 


 

 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Increase to be duly executed on its behalf by its undersigned Chief Executive Officer as of September 11, 2015.

 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	
/s/ Ed Bednarcik
	
 

	
 
	
Name:
	
Ed Bednarcik
	
 

	
 
	
Title: 
	
Chief Executive Officer
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2015, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITALADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., asNCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer,PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-LC22 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 12

To amend title 17, United States Code, with respect to infringement of

copyright.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. HUGHES (for himself and Mr. MOORHEAD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 17, United States Code, with respect to

infringement of copyright.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 501 of title 17, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(f) A television broadcast station is an infringer of

6 copyright and is subject to the remedies provided for in

7 this chapter (other than section 506) if such station, with8 out the express written consent of the copyright owner of

9 a work broadcast by such station, authorizes the second10 ary transmission of such copyrighted work by a cable sys-
2

•HR 12 IH

1 tem or other multichannel video programming distribu2 tor.’’.

Æ
l-- rs-:;rt ilrt-lt :T-- '

I \O11;i,,, lL\ DtS. {i( r , ,i ', ''3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FII ED

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAb _-_I

DALLAS DIvIsIoN - -T I HoV 1 6 2023 i

ii--_.-----r

LTNITED STATES oF AMERICA, $ I *TiW,

$ | "'::ru:i

v. $ Case Number: 3:22-CR-00426-M

$

SANDRA GOMEZ ( I ), $

$

Defendant. $

RBPORT AI\D RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

SANDRA GOMEZ (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has

appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the Superseding

Information. After cautioning and examining SANDRA GOMEZ (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned

in Rule 1 1, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense,. . charged is supported

by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the

plea of guilty be accepted, and that SANDRA GOMEZ (l) be adjudged guilty of 2l U.S.C. $ 843(b)rusing a

Communication Facility to Facilitate a Drug Felony, and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty ,)

of thepffense by the district judge,

{ The defendant is currently in custody and

n

should be ordered to remain in custody.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 3la3(aX1) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

The Government does not oppose release.

The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or (c).

The Government opposes release.

The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

n The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 31a3(aX2) unless (lXa) the Court finds there ts a

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional c are clearly shown

under $ 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detairy#, and (2) the Court finds by vincing evidence

n

n

n

n

tr

n

that the defendant is not likely to flee or

Date: November 16, 2023.

a dan or the

AGI JUDGENOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen ( l4) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXlXB).

Case 3:22-cr-00426-M Document 30 Filed 11/16/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 66