alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee*: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date*: December 12, 2000.                    

*Time*: 3:00 pm to 6:00 pm.                    

*Agenda*: To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place*: 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person*: Mary Ann Guadagno, The Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.                    

*Name of Committee*: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date*: December 18, 2000.                    

*Time*: 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm.                    

*Agenda*: To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place*: 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building Rm 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person*: James P. Harwood, PhD, Deputy Chief, Scientific Review Office, The Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 16, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-30174 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBERT HUGGANS,

Plaintiff,

V.

NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY 

SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 3:22-cv-2416-BN

ORDER ON SETTLEMENT

The parties report that they have agreed to settle this case. See Dkt. No. 39.

The parties are directed to file the appropriate dismissal papers – a stipulation 

of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or an agreed motion 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) with a corresponding proposed order 

– by Thursday, October 12, 2023.

If the parties do not or are unable to file the appropriate dismissal papers by 

October 12, 2023, or further proceedings become necessary or desirable, the parties 

should immediately file a joint status report with the Court.

Any unexpired deadlines in the Initial Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 18], the 

Order Setting Case for Trial [Dkt. No. 16], and any other order of the Court in this 

case are stayed until further order of the Court.

The Court cancels the October 30, 2023 jury trial and October 26, 2023 final 

pretrial conference.

Case 3:22-cv-02416-BN Document 40 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 194
-2-

SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 12, 2023

_________________________________________

DAVID L. HORAN 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02416-BN Document 40 Filed 09/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 195
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22

- 0226 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRADLEY JAY HILLIOUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER**
Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until August 5, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2024

06/24/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0226
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 3 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 3

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the disapproval of obligations under the Emergency Economic 
                       Stabilization Act of 2008.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
obligation of any amount exceeding the amounts obligated as described 
in

              

 paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 115(a) of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 22, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. J. RES. 3

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Relating to the disapproval of obligations under the Emergency Economic 
                       Stabilization Act of 2008.
```
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0181

SAT Date: 2/24/2012

Print Date: 10/3/2012

Related cases: 

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 6281-71-6, 4921-82-8.

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 2 PMN

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: THYROID; DEVEL; DEVEL NEURO; SENS (UNCERT); ONCO 

(UNCERT); AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0181

FATE: 

Solid with MP = 63-67 C (M)

log Kow = 3.94 (E) 

S = 14.2 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 2.13 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.27 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.25 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 25 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin as the neat material 

moderate absorption through the skin if in solution (pchem), moderate absorption from the lung 

and GI tract (pchem). Concern for thyroid toxicity, developmental toxicity, developmental 

neurotoxicity, and uncertain concern for oncogenicity based on thio ureas. Uncertain concern 

for sensitization based on potential reaction with proteins.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.61 imide SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.70 thiourea SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 0.11 imide SAR

fish _ chronic value 0.024 imide SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.020 thiourea SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

0.063 thiourea SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for imides and thioureas; SAR 

chemical class = imide, thiourea; MW 262; log Kow = 3.94 (EPI); S = 14.2 mg/L (P); pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

2 imide and thiourea SARs

SARs imides and thioureas

SAR Class imide, thiourea

Ecotox Category Imides

Ecotox Factors Comments: 
 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 17 Filed 03/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 32
#### McCLAIN v. STATE.

No. 21190.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is knowingly passing a forged instrument; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

*542In passing sentence the court failed to take note of the Indeterminate ‘Sentence Law. See Article 775, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. Art. 775. Therefore the sentence is reformed in order that it .may be shown that appellant is condemned to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than two nor more than five years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 6 

Attn: Dayana Medina 

1445 Ross A venue # 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Re: Domtar A.W. LLC's Supplemental Response to Request to 

Provide Information Pursuant to Clean Air Act 

Dear Ms. Medina: 

Enclosed please find the signed and notarized Affidavit of Annabeth Reitter for the 

follow-up responses submitted to U.S. EPA on August 29,2014. 

If you have any questions, please call. 

Enclosure 

cc: Anna beth Reitter 

BOSTON 

BRUSSELS 

CHICAGO 

DETROIT 

JACKSONVILLE 

LOS ANGELES 

MADISON 

MIAMI 

Very truly yours, 

~4/Lt:_ 

MILWAUKEE 

NEW YORK 

ORLANDO 

SACRAMENTO 

Mark A. Thirhke 

SAN DIEGO 

SAN FRANCISCO 

SHANGHAI 

SILICON VALLEY 

TALLAHASSEE 

TAMPA 

TOKYO 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 

4841-9435-9581.1 
Annabeth Reitter, being first duly sworn on oath, states as follows: 

(1) I am Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation for Domtar 

Corporation ("Domtar") located at 301 Pointe Basse Avenue, Nekoosa, 

Wisconsin 54457. 

(2) I make this affidavit in support of Domtar's response to the questions 

raised by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. 

EPA") during the August 21, 2014 webinar presentation and follow-up 

discussion of the answers provided pursuant to Section 114 of the Clean 

Air Act for information regarding Domtar' s Ashdown, Arkansas mill 

dated June 4, 2014, and received by Domtar on June 9, 2014 (the 

"Response"). 

(3) The objections asserted in the Response are authorized by Domtar. 

(4) Domtar has completed a diligent record search and a diligent interviewing 

process with employees who may have relevant knowledge of the 

operations and activities at the Ashdown mill that are the subject of the 

Response. 

(5) To the best of my knowledge, based upon the information currently 

available to Domtar and subject to the objections asserted in the Response, 

this Response is true, correct and accurate. Domtar reserves the right to 

revise, amend and/or update the Response in the future if Domtar obtains 

additional relevant or responsive information. 

Annabeth Reitter 

Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~ day of ~g~:ts~ 2014 

rdlt:t:_~~ 

N~l:State of WJ;,"llin 

My Commission is/expires: /~3 15 

4850-5500-3421.1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William E. Wright, Also Known as Akbar A. Aleem, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence is sufficient to establish defendant’s intent permanently to deprive the victim of the car and the money contained therein *(see, People v Coleman,*163 AD2d 900). Further, the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant as a persistent violent felony offender to 15 years to life *(see, People v Coleman, supra).*The victim’s identification testimony was properly admitted because it was the fruit of a prompt on-the-scene showup. Because the showup was not impermissibly suggestive, there was no need for the court to find an independent basis before admitting the in-court identification. Finally, there is no merit to defendant’s contentions that certain testimony of the police officers impermissibly bolstered the victim’s testimony regarding his initial report of the robbery and his showup identification of the suspects. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 228 (Friday, November 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 74104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30183]

[[Page 74104]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9024-2]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 11/16/2015 Through 11/20/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at:https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-publication/eis/search.

EIS No. 20150332, Final, FDA, PRO, PROGRAMMATIC--Standards for the 
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce for Human 
Consumption, Review Period Ends: 12/28/2015, Contact: Annette McCarthy 
240-402-1057.
EIS No. 20150333, Draft, USFWS, CA, Butte Regional Conservation Plan, 
Comment Period Ends: 02/16/2016, Contact: Dan Cox 916-414-6593.
EIS No. 20150334, Draft, USFS, CA, Rim Fire Reforestation, Comment 
Period Ends: 01/11/2016, Contact: Maria Benech 209-532-3671.
EIS No. 20150335, Final, NRC, IL, Generic--License Renewal of Nuclear 
Plants Regarding Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2, Review Period Ends: 
12/28/2015, Contact: Richard G. Baum 301-415-0018.
EIS No. 20150336, Draft, USACE, AK, Donlin Gold Project, Comment Period 
Ends: 04/30/2016, Contact: Keith Gordon 907-753-5710.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20150302, Draft, NPS, WY, Moose-Wilson Corridor Draft 
Comprehensive Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 01/15/2016, 
Contact: Chris Church 303-969-2276; Revision to FR Notice Published 10/
30/2015; Extending Comment Period from 12/29/2015 to 01/15/2016.

    Dated: November 23, 2015.
Karin Leff,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-30183 Filed 11-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3018]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701-TA-393 and 731-TA-829, 830, 833, 834, 836, and 
838 (Final)]


Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products From Argentina, Brazil, Japan, 
Russia, South Africa, and Thailand

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject investigations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: Date of commission action.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Haines (202-205-3200), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 1, 1999, the Commission 
established a schedule for the conduct of the final phase of the 
subject investigations (Federal Register 64 FR 67307, December 1, 
1999). The Commission received notification of the Department of 
Commerce's final determinations in these investigations on January 27, 
2000. The Commission, therefore, is revising its schedule to conform 
with Commerce's notification.
    The Commission's new schedule for the investigations is as follows: 
the Commission will release the staff report to parties on February 18, 
the final release of information will be on February 25; and final 
party comments are due on February 29.
    For further information concerning these investigations see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority: These investigations are being conducted under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 2, 2000.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-3018 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Case 3:22-cr-00416-K Document 72 Filed 11/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 193
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Azhar M. Chaudhary v. Victoria A. Mora and Kristie R. Salter

Appellate case number: 01-21-00352-CV

Trial court case number: 18-DCV-254442

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant Azhar M. Chaudhary has filed a combined motion for rehearing and for en 

banc reconsideration. The Court requests a response. The appellees’ response is due 

November 3, 2022. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Peter Kelly_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __October 20, 2022____
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0340 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-073-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-76C Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: These actions are intended to prevent unintended movement of the engine control levers, 

resulting in main rotor speed decay and subsequent loss of control of the aircraft.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $939

Labor per Helicopter

(2 x $85/work-hours) $170

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $1,109

Total US Fleet Cost $57,668

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Kirk Gustafson
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

September 17, 2015

 

Ashford Inc.

14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1100

Dallas, Texas  75254

Attn:  Independent Directors

 

Re: Clarification regarding that certain Third Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (as amended, the “Advisory Agreement”), dated June 10, 2015, among Ashford Hospitality Prime, Inc. (“Ashford Prime Inc.”), Ashford Hospitality Prime Limited Partnership (the “Prime Operating Partnership”), Ashford Prime TRS Corporation (‘TRS Corp.” and, together with Ashford Prime Inc., Prime Operating Partnership and TRS Corp., collectively “Ashford Prime” ), Ashford Inc. (“Ashford Inc.) and Ashford Hospitality Advisors LLC (“Ashford LLC” and, together with Ashford Inc., collectively, the “Advisor”)

 

Gentlemen:

 

In connection with Advisor entering into certain definitive documents for the combination of Advisor with Remington Holdings, LP (“Remington”), the independent directors of Advisor and Ashford Prime agree to the following clarification to the Advisory Agreement:

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Advisory Agreement including, without limitation, the definitions of “Adjusted EBITDA” and “Net Earnings”, the parties clarify and agree that for purposes of determining the “Termination Fee” under the Advisory Agreement, “Net Earnings” and “Adjusted EBITDA” shall not include Advisor’s Adjusted EBITDA (Advisors GAAP net income plus income taxes, depreciation, amortization and one-time expenses and other adjustments) arising under that certain Ashford Prime Hotel Master Management Agreement dated November 19, 2013, among TRS Corp., Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC, and the Landlords (as defined therein) (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Master Management Agreement”) attributable to Management Fees, Project Management Fees and Market Service Fees (all as defined in the Master Management Agreement) earned by Remington Holdings, LP and/or its subsidiaries and consolidated with the Advisor.

 

To evidence your agreement to the foregoing, please execute below.

 

14185 DALLAS PARKWAY  -  SUITE 1100  -  DALLAS, TEXAS  75254

972-490-9600  -  MAIN    972-490-9605  -  FAX

 











 

	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
ASHFORD   HOSPITALITY PRIME, INC.,
    
	
 
    	
On   behalf of Ashford Prime
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Curtis B. McWilliams
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Curtis   B. McWilliams
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Lead   Director
    


 

	
AGREED:
    	
 
    
	
ASHFORD INC.,
    	
 
    
	
On behalf of Advisor
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Brian Wheeler
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Brian   Wheeler
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Lead   Director
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
September 17, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 40

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
permit Congress to grant power to the Supreme Court to remove judges in 
                             certain cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
permit Congress to grant power to the Supreme Court to remove judges in 
                             certain cases.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress may by law provide that the Supreme Court may remove 
from office any judge of a court ordained and established under article 
III of this Constitution, if the Supreme Court determines that such 
judge has been convicted in a Federal court of a criminal offense.''.

                                 <all>
```