alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<CIK>                  0000943322
<NAME>                 TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO HOLDINGS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         219,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,198
<INVENTORY>                                      9,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               305,258
<PP&E>                                       1,890,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                 415,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,003,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,231
<BONDS>                                      1,355,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     441,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,003,916
<SALES>                                        649,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               724,296
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  381,535 <F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               177,117 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,545
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,503
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (59,132)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (42,629)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
<F1>  Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other.
<F2>  Includes general & administration and depreciation & amortization.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1



                          National Energy Group, Inc.
                  Computation of Historical Ratio of Earnings
                                to Fixed Charges
                       (in thousands, except for ratios)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Year ended December 31,
                                                 -------------------------------------------------------------  
Earnings                                           1994        1995         1996         1997           1998
                                                 --------    --------     --------     --------       --------  
<S>                                             <C>         <C>         <C>            <C>           <C>
     Income (loss) before income taxes and
        extraordinary items                      $ (489)    $   206      $(40,061)     $ (41,624)    $ (164,514)
     Interest expense                               498         995         3,621         11,256         15,719
     Amortization of debt issuance cost              19          37           151            640            936
     Interest portion of rental expense              21          34            37             83            100
                                                 ------     -------      --------      ---------     ----------
         Earnings (loss)                         $   49     $ 1,272      $(36,252)     $ (29,645)    $ (147,759)
                                                 ======     =======      ========      =========     ==========
Fixed charges:
     Interest, including capitalized portion     $  498     $   995      $  3,621      $  13,801     $   19,090
     Amortization of debt issuance cost              19          37           151            640            936
     Interest portion of rental expense              21          34            37             83            100
                                                 ------     -------      --------      ---------     ----------
         Fixed charges                           $  538     $ 1,066      $  3,809      $  14,524     $   20,126
                                                 ======     =======      ========      =========     ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    -         1.2X            -              -              -
                                                 ======     =======      ========      =========     ==========

Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges          $ (489)          -      $(40,061)     $ (44,169)    $ (167,885)
                                                 ======     =======      ========      =========     ==========
</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1393

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the luxury

excise tax shall not apply to certain equipment installed on a passenger

vehicle for the use of disabled individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1993

Mr. RICHARDSON (for himself, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr.

FRANKS of Connecticut, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr.

MCDERMOTT, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. BACCHUS of

Florida, Mr. NEAL of North Carolina, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr.

ANDREWS of New Jersey, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. KREIDLER,

Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina,

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. DORNAN, and Mr. PETRI) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the luxury excise tax shall not apply to certain

equipment installed on a passenger vehicle for the use

of disabled individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1393 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM LUXURY EXCISE TAX FOR

2 CERTAIN EQUIPMENT INSTALLED ON PAS3 SENGER VEHICLES FOR USE BY DISABLED IN4 DIVIDUALS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 4004(b)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to separate

7 purchase of article and parts and accessories therefor) is

8 amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

10 (A),

11 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub12 paragraph (C), and

13 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol14 lowing new subparagraph:

15 ‘‘(B) the part or accessory is installed on

16 a passenger vehicle to enable or assist an indi17 vidual with a disability to operate the vehicle, or

18 to enter or exit the vehicle, by compensating for

19 the effect of such disability, or’’.

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend22 ments made by section 11221(a) of the Omnibus Budget

23 Reconciliation Act of 1990.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1115 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1115

  To extend with respect to certain disasters the maximum period for 
 which individuals are eligible for unemployment assistance under The 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act from 26 
                           weeks to 52 weeks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1993

 Mrs. Mink (for herself, Mrs. Meek, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Diaz-Balart, 
   Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Deutsch, and Mr. Underwood) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend with respect to certain disasters the maximum period for 
 which individuals are eligible for unemployment assistance under The 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act from 26 
                           weeks to 52 weeks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the maximum period 
for which assistance may be provided to individuals unemployed as a 
result of a major disaster occurring after July 31, 1992, and on or 
before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 410(a) of 
The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 
shall be 52 weeks instead of 26 weeks.

                                 <all>
```
In the Senate of the United States, 

September 29, 2010. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1061) entitled ‘‘An Act to transfer certain land 

to the United States to be held in trust for the Hoh Indian 

Tribe, to place land into trust for the Hoh Indian Tribe, and 

for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æOn page 4, lines 13 through 15, strike øupon compli2 ance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969¿ 

3 and insert in accordance with the regulations of the Depart4 ment of the Interior for implementing the National Envi5 ronmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) that 

6 are applicable to trust land acquisitions for Indian tribes 

7 that are mandated by Federal legislation, 

8 Ω2æOn page 8, strike lines 17 through 22 and insert the 

9 following: 
2 

† HR 1061 EAS 

1 SEC. 5. GAMING PROHIBITION. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 1061 

AMENDMENTS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barry Morris, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), rendered March 10, 1988, convicting him of attempted aggravated assault upon a police officer (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted after being identified by two police officers as the man who shot at them as they attempted to stop him for questioning with respect to a prior reported crime. He contends that a missing witness charge should have been given because an individual who had identified him was not called as a witness by the prosecution. This contention is without merit as the People met their burden of establishing that the witness’s testimony, although relevant, would have been cumulative to other evidence *(see, People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424, 428).

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in instructing the jury to draw no inference from his failure to testify *(see,*CPL 300.10 [2]), is unpreserved for appellate review, as he did not register any objection to the charge at the time it was given *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the charge as given by the trial court was a simple neutral statement that did not unduly emphasize the defendant’s silence, so as to impinge on his constitutional right against *465self-incrimination and deprive him of a fair trial *(see, People v Ruscitti,*163 AD2d 431; *People v Priester,*162 AD2d 633).

The defendant’s further contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by virtue of the reference to him by the two complainant police officers as resembling a suspect in a prior crime is without merit. This testimony was relevant to put into context the police action in attempting to stop the defendant for questioning *(see, People v Molineux,*168 NY 264; *People v Brockington,*126 AD2d 655). Moreover, the reference was limited, indicating only that the defendant matched the general description of a perpetrator of the prior crime, and not that he was the perpetrator.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1994-D, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         427,012
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               618,774
<PP&E>                                         4,534,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,433,699)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,719,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,444
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,658,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,719,287
<SALES>                                        465,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               479,378
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,040,495<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (615,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (615,062)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (615,062)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         155,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,795
<PP&E>                                       2,095,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,308,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,479,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,205
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,883,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,308,979
<SALES>                                          3,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,536
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  439,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (35,520)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (471,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (471,690)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 232 (Friday, December 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75239-75240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service--Arizona's Section IV of the Field Office Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS Arizona 
Section IV of the Field Office Technical Guide for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS Arizona to issue a series of new 
conservation practice standards in its Section IV of the Field Office 
Technical Guide. These new standards include Nutrient Management (Code 
590) and Waste Management System (Code 312).

DATES: Comments will be received on or before January 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Noller Herbert, 
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 3003 N. Central Ave., 
Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ, 85012-2945.
    Copies of these standards are available from the NRCS, attention: 
Noller Herbert, 3003 N. Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ 85012-
2945 or can be downloaded from the NRCS Arizona ftp site: ftp://ftp.az.nrcs. usda.gov/fotg/sec4/draft.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture

[[Page 75240]]

Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS 
will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that 
period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition 
of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.

    Dated: November 17, 2000.
Michael Somerville,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 00-30596 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1397 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 41 Purdy Avenue in Rye, New York, as the 

‘‘Caroline O’Day Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 1397 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CAROLINE O’DAY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 41 Purdy Avenue in Rye, New 

4 York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Caroline 

5 O’Day Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Caroline O’Day Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               409
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               863
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       23,082
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                   0
<LOANS>                                           44,654
<ALLOWANCE>                                          455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    71,838
<DEPOSITS>                                        51,648
<SHORT-TERM>                                       6,923
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  503
<LONG-TERM>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              14
<OTHER-SE>                                        12,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                    71,838
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      906
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    386
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      31
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   1,323
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   672
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                651
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         12
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      276
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           198
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         198
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      3.68
<LOANS-NON>                                          363
<LOANS-PAST>                                         155
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     443
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                         12
<RECOVERIES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    455
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 200
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              255


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STACEY EVERETT

,

Appellant,

v.

JAMIE EVERETT

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00035

- CV

Appeal from the

158th District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# 2009

- 20906

- 158)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and render judgment setting

aside the clarifying order in regard to post

- divorce maintenance

.

We further order that Appellant recover from Appellee the appellate costs incurred by

Appellant, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.