alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Council on Disability 

An independent federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress 

to enhance the quality of life for all Americans with disabilities and their families 

Agency Shutdown Plan 

August 2023

1. PURPOSE: To provide the National Council on Disability’s (“NCD”) policy

guidance and instructions for actions to be taken when Congress fails to enact

either regular appropriations, a continuing resolution, or needed supplemental,

resulting in an interruption of fund availability. In the absence of appropriations:

• NCD officers may not incur any obligations that cannot lawfully be funded from

prior appropriations unless such obligations are otherwise authorized by law.

• NCD officers may incur obligations as necessary for orderly termination of an

agency's functions, but funds may not be disbursed.

2. SCOPE: This plan applies to all NCD personnel including the nine Special

Government Employees (private citizen Presidential and Congressional

appointees.)

3. POLICY: In order to execute an orderly shutdown, the following information

is provided:

• Estimated time to complete shutdown: One half-day;

• Number of on-board employees prior to execution: 11;

• Number of employees retained under plan: 0;

• Executive Director, on behalf of the Chair, will notify OMB that shutdown

procedures have initiated;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations or designee will notify building

management of shutdown status;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations will notify all agency

personnel of shutdown status and will initiate action to issue furlough notices and

other instructions as appropriate;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations will direct Contracting

Officer's Representatives to notify agency contractors of shutdown status and

other instructions as appropriate;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations will direct Network Consultant

to ensure servers and other IT equipment are secured; and

• Agency personnel will be instructed to obtain information from news outlets for

when a continuing resolution or an FY 2023 appropriation has been approved

and that they will be expected to return to work on their next regularly scheduled

workday.
1331 F Street, NW ■ Suite 850 ■ Washington, DC 20004

202-272-2004 Voice ■ 202-272-2022 Fax ■ www.ncd.gov

4. REFERENCES:

• OMB Circular No. A-ll (2015), Section 124.2, pages 1-2

• OMB Memo M-13-22, Planning for Agency Operations during a Potential

Lapse in Appropriations (and attachments), September 17, 2013.

5. REVIEW: This Agency Shutdown Plan has been prepared, with the

assistance of NCD’s Director of Administration, Finance, and Operations as well

as the Executive Director, and reviewed by the undersigned. It complies with

guidance provided in the reference documents.

 Respectfully, 

Andrés J. Gallegos 

Chairman
Remote Customer Service and Retention Representative (Job ID 2119437)

From: sonya chapman (snychpmn@yahoo.com)
To: — snychpmn@yahoo.com

Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 08:37 PM CST

Major Responsibilities

We are hiring for our Account Management department as a Retention Agent in the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, lowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota,
Texas and Virginia.

In Account Management, our pursuit to make things right is the driving force behind our customer loyalty. We are the customer's
champion - the architect who builds a bridge between what the customer wants, and the value we have to offer through an array
of ADT products, led by a mission to protect lives, hopes, dreams, and futures.

¢ A day in the life of a Retention Agent looks like this:

¢ Answering incoming calls about our products and services with existing customers

* Retaining ADT customers by problem solving, deescalating customer issues and resolving account issues.

* Reviewing all contacts for accuracy while enhancing the department's ability to maximize profitability and resolution.
° The ability to work independently to find the best solution.

We're looking for someone with these skills:

¢ Experience in sales or retention

° Effective communication skills that help deescalate customer calls while problem solving

¢ The ability to work with multiple screens and programs open to help resolve customer issues
¢ Be able to interpret contracts and communicate terms and conditions

¢ Perform quick calculations

Compensation

* Competitive pay based on experience with additional financial incentives for team members.

Start Date and Schedule

* Our department is closed on weekends, allowing our employees to receive every weekend off, no matter the shift.

Job Requirements

* Designated place to work from home

e High speed internet. DSL, Cable or Fiber internet service with the ability to hardwire via ethernet from cable modem to your
PC

¢ At least 25mbps to of internet to download and 15mbps to upload

When you commit to us—we commit to you. Our employees receive a comprehensive, full benefits package that includes:

¢ Paid virtual training

¢ Full benefits on the 1st of the month after 31 days of employment

* Casual, yet energetic and engaging work environments

* Medical, Dental, Vision, 401(k) with employer matching

* Paid vacation time (We all need to recharge)

* Tuition reimbursement, employee referral bonuses

¢ Potential opportunities to work from home based on business needs
¢ Acculture of coaching, development and career growth opportunities

Knowledge, Skills and Abilities:


We're looking for someone with results they are proud of like:

© High school diploma, GED, college degree or some college experience
© Two (2) years customer retention experience
© Technical aptitude, problem solving skills, computer proficiency

Sonya Chapman
Case 3:22-cr-00213-K Document 28 Filed 01/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56
#### Michelle R. Alberts, Respondent, v Richard J. Alberts, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant, and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances, it was error for Supreme Court to make a temporary custody determination in an ex parte order to show cause. A custody determination, which may drastically affect a child’s welfare, ordinarily should not be based solely on an ex parte application. When defendant’s attorney appeared to object, the court compounded the error by permitting the children, whom the mother had removed from the marital residence pursuant to the ex parte order, to remain with the mother as the primary custodial parent, without conducting a hearing *(see, Audubon v Audubon,*138 AD2d 658; *Savas v Savas,*127 AD2d 578). We, therefore, modify Supreme Court’s order by deleting the first decretal paragraph and remit the matter to Supreme Court for an immediate hearing before a different Justice on the issue of temporary custody. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — temporary support.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.9 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 20, 2003, by and between Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (“Employer”) and David Sisk (“Employee”). Capitalized terms that are not defined
herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 WHEREAS,
Employer and Employee have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2003 (the “Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for the Effective Date of Employee’s employment with Employer to be October 20, 2003; and 
  
 WHEREAS, Employer is willing and Employee desires to change the Effective
Date of the Agreement on the terms and pursuant to the conditions set forth herein; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment. Section 1(e) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read
as follows: 
  
 “(e) “Effective
Date” – means October 27, 2003.” 
  
 2.
Other Provisions of Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Agreement is being modified only as stated herein, and agree that nothing else in the Agreement shall be affected by this Amendment. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date first written above. 
  

									
	WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC	 	 	 	EMPLOYEE
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Marc Schorr
	 	 	 	 	 	 /s/ David Sisk

	 	 	 Marc Schorr
	 	 	 	 	 	 David Sisk

	 	 	 CEO & President
Case 2:22-cr-00100-Z-BR Document 36 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 85
#### Lisa Mercado, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, Louis Mercado, Respondent, v Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), entered November 18, 1988, which upon jury verdicts apportioning 70% of the fault in the happening of the accident to the defendant, and 30% to the plaintiff, and finding that the plaintiff sustained $700,000 in damages for pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $490,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.

The infant plaintiff was a third grade student at a public school in Brooklyn. Since she was in a "visually impaired” program, transportation to and from school was provided by the defendant. Each day a "resource teacher” escorted her between the bus and the building. There was no evidence, however, that she did not then go about activities by herself during the school day, or that it was necessary for someone to accompany her wherever she went. The plaintiff testified that, on April 23, 1982, without waiting for her resource teacher, who was engaged in conversation with someone else, she descended stairs by herself, and, while grasping the handrail, she was pushed by a student or students who passed her, causing her to fall and to injure her knee. She attended school for several days thereafter, and did not tell her resource teacher about the accident until the beginning of June 1982.

We conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, there is no basis upon which to find the defendant liable. "[I]t has long been held that a Board of Education is not an insurer of the safety of its students” *(Totan v Board of Educ.,*133 AD2d 366, 369; *see, Hauser v North Rockland Cent. School Dist No. 1,*166 AD2d 553).

In view of our determination, we need not reach the defendant’s claim that the award was grossly excessive. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal L 12I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 012I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6415 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 012I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6415 January 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/29 of 15 January 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/30 of 15 January 2021 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/29 of 15 January 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/30 of 15 January 2021 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[ J

- 3A

- 2020 and J

- 3B

- 2020 ] [MO: Todd, J. ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KONRAD KURACH,

Appellant

v.

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 12 EAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of Superior Court entered on August 24, 2018 at No. 1726 EDA 2017 (reargument denied October 10, 2018) reversing the Order entered on April 21, 2017 and remanding to the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelph ia County, Civil Division at No. 00339 July Term, 2015.

ARGUED: March 10, 2020

MARK WINTERSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY

AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Appellant

v.

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 13 EAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of Superior Court entered on August 24, 2018 at No. 1730 EDA 2017 (reargument denied October 10, 2018) reversing the Order entered on April 21, 2017 and remanding to the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. 03543 July Term, 2015.

ARGUED: March 10, 2020

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

JUSTICE MUNDY DECIDED: August 18, 2020

I agree with the m ajority o pinion , except with respect to its implication that the

policy is entirely clear and unambiguous. See Maj. Op. at 16

- 20 . Instead, I believe the

inclusion of the language “unless the l aw of your state requires [g eneral contractor] fees

and charges be paid with the actual cash value settlement” in Section 5(e) of the[ J

- 3A

- 2020 and J

- 3B

- 2020 ] [MO: Todd, J. ]

- 2

insurance contract creates an ambiguity. Truck Insurance Policy (“Policy”) (Exhibit A to

Wintersteen Amended Class Action Complaint, 10/2/15

, at 35). More specifically, as well

expressed by the trial court

,

[o]n its face . . . the provisional language r egarding state law is ambiguous. Does exclusion of [ g eneral contractor ’s overhead and profit] apply in Pennsylvania; what about New Jersey? The idea that a lay purchaser of a homeowner insurance policy likely needs legal assistance to understand

what he or she is paying for is troublesome

.

Trial Ct. Op., 4/21/ 17, at 12 (emphasis added); s ee also id . at 15 (concluding Section

5(e)’s s tate

- law language is “contingent and ambiguous on its face”).

As I agree with th e trial court’s rationale that Section 5(e) is ambiguous

, the law

requires the Policy to be construed in favor of Appellants as the insureds. See Prudential

Property & Cas ualty Insurance Company v. Sart no , 903 A.2d 1170, 1174 (Pa. 2006)

( requiring ambiguous policy provisions to b e construed in favor of the insured and against

the insurer). To this end, my views ali gn with Part II of Justice Wecht’s concurring and

dissenting opinion. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

Justice Dougherty joins this concurring and dissenting o pinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-109 section 102(c)), the National Park Service (NPS) is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Ellis Island South Side located in upper New York Harbor, within the State of New Jersey. The purpose of the EIS is to assess the environmental consequences of alternative rehabilitation and management strategies including transportation access that will be described in a Development Concept Plan (DCP) that will form the basis for the EIS. 

The NPS will hold a series of scoping meetings to provide the public with an opportunity to provide input into the planning and assessment process. Meetings will be held at the following times and locations: 6-8 P.M., December 6, 2000, at the Department of Environmental Protection Meeting Room (1st Floor), Main DEP Building, 401 East State Street, Trenton, NJ; 11 A.M-1 P.M., December 7, 2000, 3rd Floor Conference Room, Ellis Island Main Building; and 6-8 P.M., December 7, 2000, Conference Room 2, Bowling Green Custom House, Manhattan, NY. 

The purpose of these meetings will be to obtain both written and verbal comments concerning the future direction and development of Ellis Island South Side. Those persons wishing to obtain additional information should contact the Superintendent, Statue of Liberty NM and Ellis Island, Liberty Island, New York NY 10004.

The Draft DCP/EIS is expected to be completed and available for public review and comment in the early summer of 2000. After public and interagency review of the draft document comments will be considered, and a final EIS and record of decision shall be prepared. 

Dated: November 15, 2000.

Thomas Dyer,

Chief of Planning, Northeast Region Development Office.

[FR Doc. 00-30147 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 7, 2014

NO. 03

- 12

- 00763

- CR

Daniel Whitley, Appellant

v.
The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUST ICES PEMBERTON AND F IELD MODIF IED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. However,

there was error in the sentence and cumulation order that requires correction. Therefore, the

Court modifies the trial court’s sentence and cumulation order to read as follows:

THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONSECUTIVELY AND BEGIN ONLY WHEN THE MAY 30, 2008 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF 60 YEARS IMPRISONMENT IN THE FOLLOWING CASE CEASES TO OPERATE: CAUSE NUMBER D

- 1

- DC

- 07

- 301930 IN THE 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY INVOLVING AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON.

The sentence and cumulation order , as modified, are affirmed

. Because appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### Jack COTHRAN, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 21330.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 11, 1940.

J. Mitch Johnson, of San Saba, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is exactly the same as that discussed in Tex.Cr.App. 145 S.W.2d 885, by the same appellant in an opinion of this date. For the same reasons the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 29, 2020 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00975-CV TRAVIS LEWIS, Appellant V. ERIN DUNN AND JEFF IRBY, Appellees On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07728 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Whitehill, and Molberg Opinion by Justice Bridges Appellant’s brief is overdue. Af ter appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitte d without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief t o be filed by March 13, 2020. By postcard dated March 19, 2020, we notified appellant t he time for filing appellant’s brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion with in ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure t o file a brief and an extensi on motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not fil ed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court rega rding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dis miss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

190975F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT TRAVIS LEWIS, Appellant
No. 05-19-00975-CV V. ERIN DUNN AND JEFF IRBY, Appellees On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-07728. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellees ERIN DUNN A ND JEFF IRBY recover their costs of this appeal fro m appellant TRAVIS LEWIS.
Judgment entered April 29, 2020.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of Universal Holdings and
Consulting, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to
my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2015 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Gary O'Neill
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 13, 2016