alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David Lieberman,  Chief  Executive  Officer  ofWorld Health Energy Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/David LiebermanDavid LiebermanChief Executive Officer


Date: November12, 2010





________________
 
 This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
tenx_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 



DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION







Beginning June 15, 2015, all of our non-employee directors will be paid the following compensation for service on the Board and Board Committees:








	
●   

	
An annual director fee in each fiscal year of $45,000 ($55,000 for our board chairman), which is paid in equal quarterly installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter;













	
●   

	
An annual audit committee member fee in each fiscal year of $7,500 ($15,000 for our audit committee chairman), which is paid in equal quarterly installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter;













	
●   

	
An annual compensation committee member fee in each fiscal year of $5,000 ($10,000 for our compensation committee chairman), which is paid in equal quarterly installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter;













	
●   

	
An annual nominating and corporate governance committee member fee in each fiscal year of $3,500 ($7,000 for our nominating and corporate governance committee chairman), which is paid in equal quarterly installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter;













	
●   

	
An annual grant of 10,000 stock options (25,000 stock options in the initial year), which vest one-year after the grant date and are exercisable for a period of ten years, issued on the first day of each fiscal year; and













	
●   

	
Reimbursement of travel and related expenses for attending Board and Committee meetings, as incurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-11-001]

Take notice that on November 17, 2000, Arkansas Western Pipeline, L.L.C. (AWP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 28, Substitute Original Sheet No. 28A, and Substitute Original Sheet No. 60B, to be effective November 1, 2000.

AWP asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's order issued October 27, 2000, in Docket No. RP01-11-000.

AWP states that it is filing to remove from its tariff provisions providing for the imposition of transportation charges for imbalance netting and trading pursuant to the directive of the Commission's order in this proceeding.

AWP further states that it has served copies of this filing upon the company's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30346 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




Summary of Compensation — Named Executive Officers




Chairman and Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.



The Compensation Committee of the Board sets the base salaries and performance bonus criteria of
the Executive Officers in Table I on an annual basis. For fiscal 2005, the Compensation Committee
did not take any action that would increase the salary or bonus payable to Mr. Horton or to Mr.
Tomnitz beyond what was approved at the beginning of the prior fiscal year.




Table I




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Name	 	 	Office	 	 	Annual Base Salary	 	 	Performance Bonus	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Fiscal 2005)	 	 	Under the Amended	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	and Restated 2000	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Incentive Bonus	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Plan	 
	 	Donald R. Horton

	 	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	$	400,000	 	 	 	See Note 1	 
	 	Donald J. Tomnitz

	 	 	Vice Chairman,
President and CEO
	 	 	$	300,000	 	 	 	See Note 1	 
	 






Note 1: Under the Amended and Restated 2000 Incentive Bonus Plan, Mr. Horton and Mr.
Tomnitz will each receive a bonus payment based upon achieving certain performance goals
with respect to quarterly consolidated pre-tax income of the Company. These goals are set by
the Compensation Committee and ratified and approved by the Board of Directors at the
beginning of each fiscal year.




In addition, Mr. Horton and Mr. Tomnitz may participate in two separate deferred
compensation plans. The first plan allows the executive to make voluntary income deferrals.
The second plan is a promise by the Company to pay retirement benefits to the executive. If
the executive is employed by the Company on the last day of the current fiscal year (for
example September 30, 2005), then the Company will establish a liability to him equal to 10%
of his annual base pay as of first day of the current fiscal year (for example October 1,
2004). This liability will accrue earnings in future years at a rate established by the
administrative committee.



Other Named Executive Officers



For the six month period ended March 31, 2005, the Board of Directors, on recommendation of the
Compensation Committee, approved discretionary bonuses to the Executive Officers listed in Table
II. The annual base salaries of these Executive Officers are set by the Board of Directors, on
recommendation from the Compensation Committee, on an annual basis.




Table II




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Name	 	 	Office	 	 	Annual Base Salary	 	 	Discretionary Bonus	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(Fiscal 2005)	 	 	for the six-month	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	period ended	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	March 31, 2005	 
	 	Samuel R. Fuller

	 	 	Senior Executive

Vice President
	 	 	$	200,000	 	 	 	$	125,000	 	 
	 	Bill W. Wheat

	 	 	Executive Vice

President & CFO
	 	 	$	200,000	 	 	 	$	125,000	 	 
	 	Stacey H. Dwyer

	 	 	Executive Vice

President & Treasurer
	 	 	$	200,000	 	 	 	$	125,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at July 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Income for the Six
Months Ended July 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,902,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               71,073,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,014,219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            85,417,075
<PP&E>                                      26,835,356
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,384,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             165,735,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,491,247
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       179,105
<OTHER-SE>                                 113,407,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               165,735,188
<SALES>                                     47,165,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,165,581
<CGS>                                       29,849,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,076,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,123,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,204,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,463,233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,741,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,471,295
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6875

PERCELL RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; LOUIS NEWSOME, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-284-5-BR) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Percell Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Percell Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correction , No. CA-98-284-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 2:22-cv-00210-Z-BR Document 16 Filed 06/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
EXHIBIT 31.2

       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
       ------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Steven P. Ensz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Natural Energy
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
         business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
         to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
         in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
         disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
         conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
         procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
         such evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
         issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
         the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small
         business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
         report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
         materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
         financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

Date:  August 15, 2003                               /s/Steven P. Ensz
                                                     -----------------
                                                     Steven P. Ensz
                                                     Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Jean-Pierre M. Ergas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Corporation (the Company) and Kevin C. Kern, Vice-President of
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended January 1, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 10, 2006



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Jean-Pierre M. Ergas            
|Jean-Pierre M. Ergas                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                   
|Kevin C. Kern                       
|Vice-President of Administration and
|Chief Financial Officer
#### L. C. GABEHART, Appellant, v. F. L. LIGHTFOOT, Appellee.

No. 10825.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 21, 1941.

J. Earl Barnhouse, of Freer, for appellant.

Perkins & Floyd, of Alice, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion, on authority of Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Davis, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J., at trial with a jury), rendered June 28, 1989, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 Vi to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s *Sandoval*compromise, which permitted the prosecution to explore 11 of defendant’s past convictions, was not an abuse of discretion. The trial court’s ruling, suggested by defendant’s request for a compromise, precluded any inquiry into the underlying facts of any of the convictions, and with the exception of one conviction of grand larceny, did not permit the prosecutor to elicit the nature of the charges. The court also permitted the prosecutor to question defendant on his use of aliases, but the court placed very specific, narrow restraints upon the prosecutor. Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion *(People v Walker,*119 AD2d 521; *People v Rahman,*62 AD2d 968, *affd*46 NY2d 882). Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Notice of a Meeting of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission 
(NBAC)

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is given of a meeting of 
the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. The Commission will discuss 
its ongoing projects: (a) Draft report on ethical issues in 
international research, and (b) ethical and policy issues in the 
oversight of human subjects research in the United States. Some 
Commission members may participate by telephone conference. The meeting 
is open to the public and opportunities for statements by the public 
will be provided on December 7 from 1-1:30 pm.

Dates/Times and Location

December 7, 2000, 8:30 am-5 pm, The Embassy Row Hilton, 2015 
Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036
December 8, 2000, 8 am-12 pm, Same Location as Above


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The President established the National 
Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) on October 3, 1999 by Executive 
Order 12975 as amended. The mission of the NBAC is to advise and make 
recommendations to the National Science and Technology Council, its 
Chair, the President, and other entities on bioethical issues arising 
from the research on human biology and behavior, and from the 
applications of that research.

Public Participation

    The meeting is open to the public with attendance limited by the 
availability of space on a first come, first serve basis. Members of 
the public who wish to present oral statements should contact Ms. Jody 
Crank by telephone, fax machine, or mail as shown below as soon as 
possible, at least 4 days before the meeting. The Chair will reserve 
time for presentations by persons requesting to speak and asks that 
oral statements be limited to five minutes. The order of persons 
wanting to make a statement will be assigned in the order in which 
requests are received. Individuals unable to make oral presentations 
can mail or fax their written comments to the NBAC staff office at 
least five business days prior to the meeting for distribution to the 
Commission and inclusion in the public record. The Commission also 
accepts general comments at its website at bioethics.gov. Persons 
needing special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other special accommodations, should contact NBAC staff at the address 
or telephone number listed below as soon as possible.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jody Crank, National Bioethics 
Advisory Commission, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 700, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892-7979, telephone (301) 402-4242, fax number (301) 480-
6900.

    Dated: November 20, 2000.
Eric M. Meslin,
Executive Director, National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-30057 Filed 11-22-00; 1:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 4167-01-P