alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Agenda – May 2015 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – April 30-May 1, 2015 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, April 27, 2015 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov and NY.QTR@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury 

officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

 Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 Low/High 

 April-June 2015 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 July-September 2015 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 FY 2015 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

 FY 2016 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 FY 2017 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

 FY 2015 / 

 FY 2016 / 

 FY 2017 / 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2015 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2015 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

 3-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 10-year note (May) / 

 10-year note reopening (June/July) / / - / 

 30-year bond (May) / 

 30-year bond reopening (June/July) / / 

 2-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 5-year note (May/June/July ) / / / / - / / 

 7-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 10-year TIPS reopening (May) 

 30-year TIPS reopening (June) 

 10-year TIPS (July) 

 2-year FRN reopening (May/June) 

 2-year FRN (July) 

 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates 

 52-week bill size (May/June/July) / / / / / - / / 

 Total change in bills outstanding 5/15-7/15 / 

 Total change in bills outstanding FY 2015 / 

 CMB issuance May‘15 – July ‘15 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics 

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2015 and FY2016. Do you believe the 

current financing schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s financing needs though the end of FY2015? 

2. Please discuss the contributing factors to the behavior in various money market rates at and near the most 

recent March quarter-end. Specifically, discuss conditions in the repo market during this time, including 

rates, counterparty participation, and liquidity. Also, do you expect this type of volatility to become more 

common around mid-month or month-end dates? Is there anything Treasury can do to help alleviate this 

volatility? 

3. Discuss the drivers of, and recent trends in, the term premium in the Treasury market. What is the outlook 

for the term premium over the intermediate- and longer-term?
Exhibit No. 10.61




AMENDMENT TO NOTE




---

---

This Amendment to Note
(“Amendment”), made, delivered, and effective as of June ___, 2010, by and
between Advanced Photonix, Inc. (“Borrower”) and THE PRIVATEBANK AND TRUST
COMPANY (“Bank”).




WHEREAS, Borrower and Bank
are parties to that certain Promissory Note (Line of Credit-Prime) in the
original principal amount of $3,000,000 dated September 25, 2008 (“Note”);
and




WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower
desire to amend the Note as set forth below;




NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the mutual promises contained in this
Amendment, Borrower and Bank agree as follows:




The definition of Applicable Margin is amended
to read as follows:


“‘Applicable Margin’ shall mean two
percent (2%).”




Borrower is responsible for all costs incurred
by Bank, including without limit reasonable attorney fees, with regard to the
preparation and execution of this Amendment.


The execution of this Amendment shall not be
deemed to be a waiver of any Default or Event of Default.


All the terms used in this Amendment which are
defined in the Note shall have the same meaning as used in the Note, unless
otherwise defined in this Amendment.


Borrower waives, discharges, and forever
releases Bank, Bank’s employees, officers, directors, attorneys, stockholders,
and their successors and assigns, from and of any and all claims, causes of
action, allegations or assertions that Borrower has or may have had at any time
up through and including the date of this Amendment, against any or all of the
foregoing, regardless of whether any such claims, causes of action, allegations
or assertions are known to Borrower or whether any such claims, causes of
action, allegations or assertions arose as result of Bank’s actions or omissions
in connection with the Note, or any amendments, extensions or modifications
thereto, or Bank’s administration of the debt evidenced by the Note or
otherwise.


This Amendment is not an agreement to any
further or other amendment of the Note.


Borrower expressly acknowledges and agrees
that except as expressly amended in this Amendment, the Note, as amended,
remains in full force and effect and is ratified, confirmed and
restated.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed and delivered this Amendment on the date set forth
above.




THE PRIVATEBANK AND TRUST ADVANCED PHOTONIX,
INC.COMPANY




By:
            
            By:Its:
            
            Its:


80




---
Exhibit
10.1


 


THIRD
AMENDMENT TO EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT (the “Third Amendment”)
to EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN (“Plan”) is executed as of the
25th day of April, 2005.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of Equity
Residential (the “Company”) adopted the 2002 Share Incentive Plan (“Plan”) on February 21,
2002, which was approved by the shareholders of the Company at the 2002 annual
meeting.


 


WHEREAS, the Company entered into a First
Amendment to the Plan dated as of February 7, 2003.


 


WHEREAS, the Company entered into a Second
Amendment to the Plan dated as of June 10, 2003.


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend
the Plan pursuant to this Third Amendment, which has been approved by the Board
of Trustees.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is further amended as
follows:


 


AMENDMENTS


 


1.                                       Share Awards.
Section 5 (a) (iii) (B) and Section 5 (a) (iii) (C) are hereby
deleted in their entirety and the following sections are substituted therefor:


 


(B)                                with respect to a
Grantee who is an employee or officer in connection with his or her disability
(as defined in Section 5(d)), or retirement at or after the age of 62; or


 


(C)                                with respect to a
Grantee who is a member of the Board (excluding employee trustees) in
connection with his or her retirement at or after age 70, the Board’s decision
not to renominate him or her for re-election to the Board at any shareholders’
meeting at which Trustees are elected, or the failure to be re-elected to the
Board at any such shareholders’ meeting, or the Trustee’s resignation from the
Board by reason of either:  (i) a
material change in the Trustee’s employment or job responsibilities; or (ii)
the Trustee’s disability.


 


2.                                       Share Options.
Section 6 (e) (ii) and Section 6 (e) (iii) are hereby deleted in
their entirety and the following are substituted therefor:


 


(ii)                                  with respect to a
Grantee who is an employee or officer in connection with his or her disability
(as defined in Section 5(d)), or retirement at or after the age of 62, in
which case it shall be exercisable until its Expiration Date; or


 


(iii)                               with respect to a
Grantee who is a member of the Board (excluding employee trustees) in
connection with his or her retirement at or after age 70,  the Board’s decision not to renominate him or
her for re-election to the Board at any shareholders’ meeting at which Trustees
are elected, or the failure to be re-elected to the Board at any such
shareholders’ meeting, or the Trustee’s 


 





















 


resignation from the Board by reason of either:  (i) a material change in the Trustee’s
employment or job responsibilities; or (ii) the Trustee’s disability, in which
case it shall be exercisable until its Expiration Date.


 


3.                                       Plan.
After giving effect to this Third Amendment, the Plan remains in full force and
effect.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2


                       FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT


This Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement made and entered into by and between
Commerce Street Associates, LLC ("Landlord") and Pinnacle Financial Partners
("Tenant"), formerly known as TMP, Inc. ("Tenant").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated
March 16, 2000, wherein Landlord leased to Tenant certain Premises in an office
building to be constructed at 110-120 Third Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee
to be known as the MagneTek Building;

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a First Amendment to Office Lease
Agreement dated September 2000;

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Second Amendment to Lease Agreement
dated December 12, 2002;

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Third Amendment to Lease Agreement
dated February 12, 2004; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Lease as hereinafter set forth;

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the Premises and other good and
valuable consideration the parties agree as follows:

         1.      The office building is known as Commerce Center and is located
                 at 211 Commerce Street, Nashville, Tennessee.

         2.      The premises are herewith increased by 6,741 rentable square
                 feet (RSF), all of which are located on the third floor of the
                 building. Section 1(a) of the Lease Agreement is herewith
                 amended to reflect the total rentable square feet (RSF) to be
                 24,745.

         3.      The "Commencement Date" for the additional space shall be the
                 date of occupancy, but no later than July 1, 2005.

         4.      Exhibit B to Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, Minimum Rent
                 is herewith replaced by Exhibit B to Fourth Amendment to Lease
                 Agreement, Minimum Rent.

         5.      All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in
                 full force and effect except as modified herein.

       In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Fourth Amendment to
Lease Agreement as of the 18th day of March 2005.



                                           COMMERCE STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC


                                           By: /s/ Robert C. H. Mathews, Jr.
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Robert C. H. Mathews, Jr.
                                           Its: Chief Manager



                                           PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS


                                           By: /s/ Hugh M. Queener
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Hugh M. Queener
                                           Its: CAO and EVP
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY


Meeting of White House Task Force on Drug Use in Sport

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting of White House Task Force on Drug Use in 
Sport on December 7, 2000 in Salt Lake City, Utah.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the White House Task Force on Drug Use in Sport 
will be held on Thursday, December 7, 2000 in Salt Lake City, Utah in 
the Wasatch Ballroom of the Wyndham Hotel, 215 W. South Temple, 2nd 
Floor, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. The meeting will commence at 8:00 
a.m. on December 7th and will conclude at 12:30 p.m. The agenda will 
focus on two key issues: (1) How can the United States help ensure a 
drug free 2002 Winter Olympic Games; and (2) How can the United States 
most effectively reach out to young people to prevent the use of drugs 
in sport. There will be an opportunity for public comment from 11:10 
a.m. until 11:40 on Thursday December 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please direct any questions to Linda 
V. Priebe, Assistant General Counsel (202) 395-6622, Office of National 
Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, 
D.C. 20503.

Linda V. Priebe,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-30540 Filed 11-27-00; 2:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 3180-02-P
Abatement Order filed November 5, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00692-CR

____________

SAUNDREA ANNETTE JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1340533

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel on appeal, Jim Leitner. On 

October 23, 2013, counsel filed a motion to withdraw as appellate counsel because 

he has accepted full-time employment with the Harris County Sheriff’s 

Department. Accordingly, we enter the following order. 

We ORDER the judge of the 263rd District Court to consider counsel’s 

request to withdraw. If current counsel is permitted to withdraw, the judge shall 
appoint new appellate counsel for appellant. The judge shall see that a record of 

any hearing is made, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the 

hearing and a supplemental clerks record containing any orders permitting counsel 

to withdraw and appointing new counsel. Those records shall be filed with the 

clerk of this court on or before December 5, 2013.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any 

party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to 

schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court’s order. If the parties do not 

request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date 

and notify the parties of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
```

Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Deep Well Oil & Gas, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Steven
Gawne, Chief (Principal) Executive Officer and President, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ Steven Gawne
Steven Gawne
President/Chief (Principal) Executive Officer
```
#### KIRKLAND v. STATE.

No. 25982.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct 29, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George ' P. Blackburn, 'State’s- Atty., of Austin, for the St.ate.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 'a fine of $150.

■ The two arresting officers testified that appellant was the driver of the automobile and that in their opinion lie. was intoxicated.

The appellant and his witnesses denied appellant’s intoxication, contending that he had drunk only one bottle of beer, and asserted that his physical condition at the time of his arrest was due to certain pills which he had taken upon the advice of a doctor.

- The jury’s verdict resolved the contested issue of fact against the appellant.

Bill of exception No. i is qualified to show that the question complained of was not asked.

Bill of exception No. 2 seeks to complain of the closifig argument of the County Attorney. The bill fails to show that such argument was not in reply to argument of appellant’s counsel nor p-rovoked or -invited thereby. Such a bill presents nothing for review. Baker v. State, 154 Tex. Cr.R. 116, 225 S.W.2d 828, and Baggett v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 618, 229 S.W.2d 801.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Case 3:22-cr-00377-M Document 64 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 186
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ronco Corporation
(the "Company") for the period from October 15, 2004 (Date of Inception) to June
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Evan J. Warshawsky, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                             /s/ Evan J. Warshawsky
                             ----------------------
                               Evan J. Warshawsky

November  , 2005

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U. S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
National Council on Disability Quarterly FOIA Report

Fiscal Year 2023, Quarter Q2

1. Ten Oldest Pending Requests: 0

2. Ten Oldest Requests Closed: 0

3. Agency Component Abbreviations

Component 

Abbreviation Component Name

NCD National Council on Disability

Agency / 

Component

Number of requests 

backlogged

Number of requests 

processed

Number of requests 

received

NCD 0 2 3
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1278

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

under part B of the medicare program of paramedic intercept services

provided in support of public, volunteer, or non-profit providers of ambulance services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Ms. DELAURO introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage under part B of the medicare program

of paramedic intercept services provided in support of

public, volunteer, or non-profit providers of ambulance

services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Ambulance

5 Support Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 1278 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF CERTAIN PARAMEDIC

2 INTERCEPT SERVICES.

3 (a) COVERAGE.—

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(7) of the

5 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(7)) is

6 amended by striking ‘‘regulations;’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘regulations, including paramedic intercept services

8 (as described in subsection (oo));’’.

9 (2) SERVICES DESCRIBED.—Section 1861 of

10 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x) is amended by adding

11 at the end the following new subsection:

12 ‘‘Ambulance Intercept Services

13 ‘‘(oo)(1) The term ‘paramedic intercept services’

14 means ambulance services consisting of advanced life sup15 port services provided by a qualified provider of ambulance

16 services under this title in support of an entity that is a

17 qualified public, volunteer, or non-profit provider of ambu18 lance services (as defined in paragraph (2)).

19 ‘‘(2) In paragraph (1), the term ‘qualified public, vol20 unteer, or non-profit provider of ambulance services’

21 means a public, volunteer, or non-profit provider of ambu22 lance services that is licensed, certified, or approved by

23 a State to provide such services (including basic life sup24 port services and transportation services) with or without

25 charge to individuals receiving such services.’’.
3

•HR 1278 IH

1 (3) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT OF PAYMENT.—

2 Section 1833(a)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

3 1395l(a)(1)) is amended—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘1834(h)(1), (M)’’ and in5 serting ‘‘1834(h)(1), (N)’’;

6 (B) by striking ‘‘(r)(2) and (N)’’ and in7 serting ‘‘(r)(2), (O)’’; and

8 (C) by striking the semicolon at the end

9 and inserting the following: ‘‘, and (P) with re10 spect to expenses for paramedic intercept serv11 ices (as defined in section 1861(oo)), the

12 amounts paid may not exceed any applicable

13 limits established on payments for such services

14 by the State in which the services are pro15 vided;’’.

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 subsection (a) shall apply to paramedic intercept services

18 provided on or after January 1, 1994.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1228 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1228

 To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force or effect, 
         and to prohibit the use of funds for certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2009

   Mr. King of New York (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
Heller, Mr. Coble, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Wilson 
 of South Carolina, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. 
   Broun of Georgia, Mr. Akin, Mr. Price of Georgia, and Mr. Taylor) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force or effect, 
         and to prohibit the use of funds for certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER.

    Executive Order 13166, ``Improving Access to Services for Persons 
with Limited English Proficiency'' (August 16, 2000; 65 Fed. Reg. 
50121), is null and void and shall have no force or effect.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    No funds appropriated pursuant to any provision of law may be used 
to promulgate or enforce any executive order that creates an 
entitlement to services provided in any language other than English.
                                 <all>
```