alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 80 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.80
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  Designating May 30, 1993, through June 7, 1993, as a ``Time for the 
National

        Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II''.

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States of America made 
  tremendous sacrifices during World War II to save the world from 
  tyranny and aggression;
Whereas the winds of freedom and democracy sweeping the globe today 
  spring from the principles for which over four hundred thousand 
  Americans gave their lives in World War II;
Whereas World War II and the events that led up to that war must be 
  understood in order that we may better understand our own times, and 
  more fully appreciate the reasons why eternal vigilance against any 
  form of tyranny is so important;
Whereas the World War II era, as reflected in its family life, industry, 
  and entertainment, was a unique period in American history, and 
  epitomized our Nation's philosophy of hard work, courage, and tenacity 
  in the face of adversity;
Whereas, between 1991 and 1995, over nine million American veterans of 
  World War II will be holding reunions and conferences and otherwise 
  commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of various events relating to 
  World War II; and
Whereas June 4, 1993, marks the Battle of Midway, and June 6, 1993, 
  marks the anniversary of D-Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 30,P
1993, through June 7, 1993, is designated as a ``Time for the National 
Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II'', and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on 
the people of the United States to observe that period with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
Take notice that on February 1, 2000, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. (Maritimes) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, following tariff sheet, to become effective on February 1, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 9

Maritimes states that it is filing the above tariff sheet to implement four negotiated rate agreements pursuant to Rate Schedule MN365 and Section 24 of the General Terms and Conditions of Maritimes' FERC Gas Tariff.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-3049  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 3:22-cv-01939-M-BH Document 6 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

CLIFFORD CLARK, §

TDCJ No. 02239054, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00059-M-BP

 § 

MICHAEL WADDELL and §

BRICE BYRD, §

§ 

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 81) is GRANTED, and 

Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED on this 22nd day of August, 2024. 

Case 7:22-cv-00059-M-BP Document 85 Filed 08/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 541
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AWARD CERTIFICATES


This Amendment to Stock Option Award Certificates (the “Amendment”) is made by and between Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. (“Optionee”) and Cumulus Media Inc. (the “Company”) on September 29, 2015 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).
WHEREAS, on December 30, 2008, the Company issued to Optionee certain options (the “Options”) to purchase shares of its Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, as set forth on Appendix A, pursuant to certain Stock Option Award Certificates under the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Award Certificates”);
WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee wish to modify the terms of the Award Certificates in accordance with the terms hereof; and
WHEREAS, this Amendment, once executed by the Company and Optionee, shall be incorporated into the Award Certificates and shall have the same force and effect as if it were part of the original Award Certificates.
NOW THEREFORE, the Company and Optionee, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Amendment to Post-Employment Exercise Periods.  Section 7(a) of the Award Certificates is amended to read in its entirety as follows:


“(a)    Termination other than upon Disability or Death or Termination for Cause.  In the event of termination of your continuous service (other than as a result of your death or disability or a Termination for Cause), you shall have the right to exercise an Option at any time prior to the Expiration Date only to the extent you were entitled to exercise such Option at the date of your termination.”
		
	2.
	All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the definition ascribed to such terms in the Award Certificates.




		
	3.
	Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Award Certificates shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.




		
	4.
	This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts (including by means of facsimile and electronically transmitted portable document format (pdf) signature pages), each of which shall be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date.


OPTIONEE:
______________________________
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.                            
COMPANY:
CUMULUS MEDIA INC.
By:    ________________________
Name:
Title:
                            











Appendix A


Options
	
				
	Date of Grant
	Number of Options
	Per Share Exercise Price
	Expiration Date

	December 30, 2008
	67,896
	$2.79
	December 30, 2018

	December 30, 2008
	67,895
	$2.92
	December 30, 2018

	December 30, 2008
	67,895
	$3.30
	December 30, 2018
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Worldwide Restaurant Concepts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles L. Boppell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: July 15, 2004 |  | /s/CHARLES L. BOPPELLCharles L. Boppell
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment
No. 1 to the Annual Report of Berkley Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Lisa Sharp, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: July 14, 2008 | /s/
      Lisa Sharp                   
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                     | Lisa Sharp, Principal Financial Officer

---
★

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 248

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the eulogies and encomiums for the late

3 President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, as ex4 pressed in the House of Representatives and the Senate,

5 together with the text of the funeral services for the late

6 President in Yorba Linda, California, shall be printed as

7 a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding.

8 The document shall be prepared under the direction of the

9 Joint Committee on Printing.

10 SEC. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall

11 be printed the lesser of—

12 (1) 32,500 copies of the document, of which

13 22,150 copies shall be for the use of the House of

14 Representatives and 10,350 copies shall be for the

15 use of the Senate; or

16 (2) such number of copies of the document as

17 does not exceed a total production and printing cost
2

HCON 248 EH1S

1 of $500,000, with distribution to be allocated in the

2 same proportion as described in paragraph (1).

Passed the House of Representatives August 3,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 248

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the printing of eulogies, encomiums,

United States, Richard M. Nixon.and funeral services for the late President of the
<PAGE>
 

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of SBM Certificate Company for the year ended December 31, 1995, of our reports
dated February 22, 1996, with respect to the financial statements and schedules
of SBM Certificate Company included in Amendment No. 7 to the Registration
Statement (Form S-1 No. 33-38066) and related Prospectus of SBM Certificate
Company.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Louisville, Kentucky
February 26, 1996

                                      37
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the periodending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jorge A. Celaya, Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  *Jorge A.  Celaya*                       |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jorge A.  Celaya                                   |
| Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| November 9,  2004                                  |

 

----
Opinion issued June 21, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-11-00913-CV

———————————

CANDACE M. LARK, Appellant

V.

SAVANNAH PLACE APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1000862

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Candace M. Lark, has neither established indigence nor paid all 

the required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases 

unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.§ 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), 
2

§ 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011)(listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding 

Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and 

Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 

(Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A§ B(1)(listing fees in court 

of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement 

of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. 

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas H. Reslewic, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.



April 30, 2004                                   /s/ Thomas H. Reslewic
                                                 ----------------------
                                                     Thomas H. Reslewic
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w6



 






Exhibit 10.6




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




The Employment Agreement made as of the 10th day of September, 2001 by and between AvalonBay

Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Leo S. Horey (“Executive”) is hereby

amended as follows:



Section 7(c)(iii)(B) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting said subsection in
its entirety and substituting thereof the following:





     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and”


Section 7(c)(iv) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection II in the
second paragraph thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





     “II. Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on
the whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive.”


Section 7(c)(v) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (B) thereof in
its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and”


Section 7(c)(vi) of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting subsection (B) thereof in its
entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and


Except as amended herein, the Employment Agreement is hereby confirmed in all
other respects.





IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, this Amendment is entered into this 31st day of March, 2005.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charlene Rothkopf
 	 
	 	 	Charlene Rothkopf, EVP – Human Resources 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	       	                                                     /s/ Edward M. Schulman
 	 
	 	 	Edward M. Schulman, 	 
	 	 	SVP, General Counsel & Secretary 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                   /s/ Leo S. Horey
 	 
	 	Executive
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonardo Wehbe, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered January 6, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was convicted after an undercover buy-and-bust operation. On appeal, defendant contends that the prosecutor’s improper cross-examination of defendant and argument in summation deprived defendant of a fair trial. None of these contentions is preserved for appellate review as a matter of law, either due to defendant’s failure to object, or because *208the particular basis for the claims now raised was not advanced below; the general objections were ultimately sustained, and no additional relief was sought *(People v Medina,*53 NY2d 951, 953).

In any event, the prosecutor who referred to the testimony of the undercover officer during the cross-examination of defendant did not challenge the defendant to express an opinion regarding the witness’s veracity. Nor did the prosecutor violate the court’s *Sandoval*ruling. The limited questioning of defendant concerning his knowledge of drug trafficking in general clearly did not suggest that defendant had a propensity to commit narcotics offenses. The prosecutor’s reference to defendant in summation as a streetwise convicted felon was unfair comment since it constituted criminal propensity. The error, however, was not preserved and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. We also find, in any event, that the error was harmless. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RODERICK DESHUN WILLIAMS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-839 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 2, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Kimberly Campbell, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Court Documents from Arkema v. EPA 

1.) Decision 

2.) Joint Opening Brief from Arkema and Solvay 

3.) Opening Brief from EPA 

4.) Joint Response Brief from Arkema and Solvay 

5.) Petition for Rehearing from EPA 

6.) Joint Response to Petition from Rehearing from Arkema and Solvay 

7.) Denial of Petition for Rehearing 

8.) Issuance of the Circuit Court’s Mandate
#### WINN v. STATE.

No. 26366.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1953.

No attorney ón appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. . .

BELCHER, Commissipner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale, and his punishment was assessed at six months in jail and a fine of $500.

The record contains no notice of appeal, in the absence of which we are without jurisdiction to enter any^order except a dismissal of the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 3, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham    |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|              |   | Steven C. Oldham,       |
|              |   | President and           |
|              |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to SureWest Communications and will be retained by SureWestCommunications and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed aspart of the Form 10-Q.

----