alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 95

Designating the week of February 7 through 13, 1994, as ‘‘Travel Agent

Appreciation Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. OBERSTAR introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week of February 7 through 13, 1994, as

‘‘Travel Agent Appreciation Week’’.

Whereas travel and tourism has become one of the fastest

growing industries in the United States, generating more

than $350,000,000,000 in 1992;

Whereas over 40,000 travel agencies in the United States

perform many vital services that save American consumers and business valuable time and money;

Whereas both business and leisure travelers have come to rely

on the travel agent for accurate, professional advice;
2

•HJ 95 IH

Whereas travel agents are an integral part of the travel and

tourism industry;

Whereas travel agents generated over $51,000,000,000 in

revenue for the airline industry in 1992 alone;

Whereas travel agents are located in all the 50 States in the

United States, and are an important source of jobs from

entry level to middle management in almost every town

throughout the country; and

Whereas it is fitting to set aside a time to honor and recognize these highly trained travel professionals: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of February 7 through 13, 1994, is des4 ignated as ‘‘Travel Agent Appreciation Week’’, and the

5 President is authorized to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe this week

7 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
exv4w1



 






Exhibit 4.1




SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE




TO INDENTURE DATED DECEMBER 23, 2002




      THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE dated as of January 19, 2005, is delivered pursuant to Section
4.18 of the Indenture dated as of December 23, 2002 (as heretofore or hereafter modified and
supplemented and in effect from time to time, the “2002 Indenture”) among LAMAR MEDIA
CORP., a Delaware corporation, certain of its subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) and WACHOVIA
BANK OF DELAWARE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking corporation, as Trustee (the
“Trustee”) (all terms used herein without definition having the meanings ascribed to them
in the 2002 Indenture).



      The undersigned hereby agree that:



      1. The undersigned is a Guarantor under the 2002 Indenture with all of the rights and
obligations of Guarantors thereunder.



      2. The undersigned has granted, ratified and confirmed, in the form and substance of Exhibit B
to the 2002 Indenture, the Guarantee provided for by Article 10 of the 2002 Indenture.



      3. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the representations and warranties set
forth in the 2002 Indenture, to the extent relating to the undersigned as Guarantor, are correct on
and as of the date hereof.



      4. All notices, requests and other communications provided for in the 2002 Indenture should be
delivered to the undersigned at the following address:



          Keith A. Istre

          Vice President – Finance and

          Chief Financial Officer

          Lamar Media Corp. and its Subsidiaries

          5551 Corporate Blvd.

          Baton Rouge, LA 70808



      5. A counterpart of this Supplemental Indenture may be attached to any counterpart of the 2002
Indenture.



      6. This Supplemental Indenture shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
internal laws of the State of New York.



 








 







      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Supplemental Indenture to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	Guarantor:
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	Lamar Obie Corporation,
	 
	 	 	 	a Delaware corporation
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Sean E. Reilly
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	Sean E. Reilly, President and
	

	 	 	 	 	 	Chief Operating Officer
	Attest:

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ James R. McIlwain	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	James R. McIlwain, Secretary	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Accepted:

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	WACHOVIA BANK OF DELAWARE

	NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Laura M. Bass	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Assistant VP	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 






 








 





SCHEDULE OF ADDITIONAL SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS




	 	 	 	 	 
	Guarantor	 	Date of Agreement	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	O.B. Walls, Inc.

	 	January 19, 2005	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Obie
Media Limited (n/k/a Lamar Transit Advertising Canada Ltd.)

	 	January 19, 2005	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Obie Billboard, LLC

	 	January 19, 2005
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Select Media, Inc.

	 	January 19, 2005
Case 6:22-cr-00025-H-BU Document 34 Filed 12/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
Senior Vice President



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 Tier Technologies, Inc. 
 Senior Vice President—Human Resources’ Compensation 
 For the Fiscal Year Ending September
30, 2005 
 (Approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors May 3, 2005) 
  
 On May 3, 2005, the Compensation Committee of Tier’s Board of Directors approved a base
salary increase for an executive officer who was named in the Summary Compensation Table of the Company’s 2004 Proxy Statement. Specifically, the base salary of Donald Fairbairn, Senior Vice President Human Resources was increased to $212,000,
which represents a 6% increase in base salary.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                        American Radio Systems Corporation

                                                    EXHIBIT 12

(In thousands, except ratio data)

                                                               Three              Three              Six                Six
                                                               Months            Months             Months            Months
                                                               Ended              Ended             Ended              Ended
                                                              June 30,          June 30,           June 30,          June 30,
                                                                1996              1997               1996              1997
                                                                ----              ----               ----              ----
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>                 <C>              <C> 
Computation of Earnings:
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
    income taxes                                        $       4,018     $       3,733       $      3,191     $        (677)
Add:
Interest expense (1)                                            4,261            15,732              8,964            23,236
Rent expense (2)                                                  235               645                429             1,142
                                                        --------------    --------------      -------------    --------------
Earnings as adjusted                                            8,514            20,110             12,584            23,701


Computation of Fixed Charges:
Interest expense (1)                                            4,261            15,732              8,964            23,236
Rent expense (2)                                                  235               645                429             1,142
Preferred dividends                                               134             8,094                134            14,292
                                                        --------------    --------------      -------------    --------------
Fixed charges                                                   4,630            24,471              9,527            38,670

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges (3)                  1.84             -----               1.32             -----
         



<FN>
----------------------------------------

(1)  Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs.
(2)  Rent expense fixed charge is assumed to be 30% of gross operating rent charges.
(3)  Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 1997
     by approximately $4,361 and $14,969, respectively.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended April 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 9, 2004                        /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           S. Leslie Flegel

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended April 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 9, 2004                         /s/ Marc Fierman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Marc Fierman
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

Certificate of the 

Chief Executive Officer of 

FNBH BANCORP, INC.

 

                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

 

                I, Ronald L. Long, President and Chief Executive Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

 

                (1)  The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

 

                (2)  The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

 

The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-18357, 333-46084, 333-67331 and 333-89377) pertaining to the Cygnus Inc. Amended 1991 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and the Cygnus Inc. Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-39275, 333-49020, 333-60598, 333-60962, 333-71524, 333-85801, and 333-91949)
and in the related prospectuses of our report dated February 1, 2002 (except for Note 14, as to which the date is February 28, 2002), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Cygnus, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | ---------------------

Palo Alto, California
March 27, 2002

---

QuickLinks
House Calendar No. 35

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1303

[Report No. 103–72]

A BILL

To designate the Federal Building and United

Courthouse’’.S. Fisher Federal Building and United StatesStreet in Trenton, New Jersey, as the ‘‘ClarksonStates Courthouse located at 402 East State

APRIL 29, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 35

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1303

[Report No. 103–72]

To designate the Federal Building and United States Courthouse located

at 402 East State Street in Trenton, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Clarkson

S. Fisher Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

APRIL 29, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal Building and United States Courthouse located at 402 East State Street in Trenton, New

Jersey, as the ‘‘Clarkson S. Fisher Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1303 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal Building and United States Courthouse

3 located at 402 East State Street in Trenton, New Jersey,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Clarkson S. Fisher

5 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 Building and United States Courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clarkson

11 S. Fisher Federal Building and United States Court12 house’’.
**National Council on Disability**

**Council Meeting Agenda**

**Thursday, July 22, 20211:00 – 4:00 PM EST**

**1:00 – 1:05 PM		Welcome and Call to Order**

· Roll Call

· Acceptance of Agenda

· May minutes 

**VOTE 1 – Acceptance of the meeting agenda**

**VOTE 2 – Acceptance of the draft minutes of the May 13, 2021 Council Meeting**

**1:05 – 1:15 PM		Chairman’s Report**

**VOTE 3 – Vote on Puerto Rico Report (Overview of report by Amy)**

**1:15 – 2:00 PM		Executive Director’s Report**

**VOTE 4 - Discussion of FY22 Policy Proposals (VOTE) (Joan)**

**2:00 – 2:15 PM		Executive Committee Report**

· Governance Representative Report (Dr. Rader)

· Finance Representative Report (Dan Schreck)

**VOTE 5 – Acceptance of financial report on status of funds**

**2:15 – 2:45  	NATIONAL DISABILITY INSTITUTE (Community Presentation)**

**2:45 – 3:15    STRATEGIC PLAN PRESENTATION (Jim Brett and Amged Soliman)**

3:15 – 3:45  **SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATES (Council Member lead)**

· Medically Underserved Population Designation & Disability Cultural Competency Curriculum 

· Use of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) as a Barrier to Health Care Access 

· Rationing and Denying Health Care to People with Disabilities 

· Medicaid Portability   

· Fostering Job Growth for People with Disabilities through the Small Business Administration 8(a) Business Development Program  

· Pursuing Better Data and Federal Guidance Regarding Sexual Assault of Students with Disabilities

· UN Convention on Civil Rights for Persons with Disabilities

**3:45 – 4:00 PM**

**Schedule of 2021 Council Meetings Unfinished business**

**4:00 PM	Adjourn**

3

# image1.png
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NAN ZHANG, Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72488 Agency No. A205

- 183

- 932

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 11, 2019 **

Before: CANBY , GRABER , and MURGUIA , Circuit Judges.
Nan Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) or der dismissing her a ppeal from an
immigration judge’s ( “IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum,
withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 18 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 72488

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substanti al evidence
the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility
determinations created by the REAL ID Act

. Zhi v. Holder , 751 F.3d 1088, 1091
(9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review , and we
remand.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because , even if credible, Zhang failed to show it is more likely than not that s he would be
tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to

China

. See Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

As to asylum and withholding of removal, t he agency found Zhang not

credible b ecause of Zhang’s vague and implausible testimony, and her demeanor

. Substantial evidence does not support the agency ’s adverse credibility

determination

. See Ren v. Holder , 648 F.3d 1079, 1088

- 89 (9th Cir. 2011)
(adverse credibility finding not supported under the totality of the circumstances , and noting that “questionin g an applicant on [her] knowledge of religious doctrine
to determine if [s]he is a true believer is not an appropriate method of determining
eligibility for asylum

. ” ) ; s ee also Zhi , 751 F.3d at 1093 ( IJ impermissibly based
adverse credibility finding on “s peculation and conjecture”); Shrestha v. Holde r,3 14

- 72488

590 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2010) (noting “the requirement that an IJ not cherry
pick solely facts favoring an adverse credibility determination while ignoring facts
that undermine that result”)

. Thus , we grant the petition for review as to Zhang’s
asylum and withholding of removal claims , and remand these claims to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537
U.S. 12, 16

- 18 (2002) (per curiam ) ; see also Soto

- Olarte v. Holder , 555 F.3d 1089,
1095 (9th Cir. 2009)

. The government shall bear the costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part ;

REMANDED
.
EPA and Social Sustainability: 

A Regional View

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1

Presentation to the National Advisory Committee on 

Environmental Policy and Technology

A. Stanley Meiburg

Deputy Regional Administrator

EPA Region 4

April 4, 2013
Sustainability and EPA

• EPA’s culture looks at “sustainability” in three 

contexts (“lenses”)

– Community lens

– Ecosystem lens

– Industrial/manufacturing lens

• All related, but present different aspects and 

involve different communities of practice

• This can create uncertainty in our language

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2
Communities and the Social Pillar

• The social pillar has not been EPA’s core 

historic focus

– Statutory obligations overdetermine EPA’s work

– EPA’s historic skill sets: scientists, engineers, 

attorneys

– EPA’s historic tools: regulation and enforcement

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3
Why The Social Pillar Matters to EPA

• Mission: Protect Human Health and the 

Environment

– Requires many tools, not just our statutory ones

– Our core tools are essential, but not sufficient

– Voluntary actions are important to our mission as 

well as required ones

– Other partners have tools we don’t

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 4
The Social Pillar Challenges EPA

• Examples:

– Community “asks” exceed our authority

– Community “asks” exceed our resources

– Technical standards do not generate community 

trust

– Community problems are outside our jurisdiction

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 5
The Way Ahead: Collaborative 

Partnerships

• Partnerships can reframe the problem

• Partnerships offer more tools

• Partnerships leverage resources

• Partnerships translate EPA-speak

• Partnerships teach lessons

• Partnerships bring understanding

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 6
EPA as a Convenor/Facilitator

• Consistent with our mission

• Requires augmented skill sets

– Communications

– Social and behavioral sciences

• Obstacles

– Statutory mandates

– Broader view of our responsibilities

– Resources

4/22/2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7