alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order

April 28, 2008

135123 135124 135125 (55)

LISA D. WYATT, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of William Nolan Wyatt, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

OAKWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTERS, a/k/a OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., PARVEZ KAHN, M.D., and THOMAS AUSTIN CHAPEL, M.D., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/ Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

SC: 135123, 135124, 135125 COA: 263370, 263372, 263375 Wayne CC: 04-402043-NH

On order of the Court, the motion for revi ew of taxation of cost s is considered, and it is DENIED.

l0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
10(xiii)

                               FOURTH AMENDMENT OF
                                 MONROE BANCORP
                          EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
             -----------------------------------------------------

       (As Amended and Restated Generally Effective as of January 1, 2001)

WHEREAS, Monroe Bancorp (the "Corporation") maintains the Monroe Bancorp
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (As Amended and Restated Generally Effective as of
January 1, 2001) (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Corporation has determined that
the Plan should be amended to provide for the allocation of cash dividends paid
on shares of the Corporation's stock only to those participants who are actively
employed on the payment date of the dividend with respect to shares (a) held
under the Plan which have not been allocated to participants' accounts as of the
payment date, and (b) allocated to the "company stock accounts" of participants
who are inactive participants and who are not 100 percent vested in their
company stock accounts as of the payment date; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 10.1 of the Plan, the
Corporation has reserved the right to amend the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power reserved to the Corporation under Section
10.1 of the Plan and delegated to the undersigned individuals, the Plan is
hereby amended, effective with respect to cash dividends paid on and after
January 1, 2004, by substituting the following for the third paragraph of
Section 4.12(a):

         "Cash dividends paid with respect to Company Stock that, as of the
         payment date of the dividend, has not been, or is not treated under the
         plan as, allocated to Participants' Company Stock Accounts, and cash
         dividends paid with respect to Company Stock allocated to the Company
         Stock Accounts of Inactive Participants who are not fully vested in
         their Accounts, will be distributed or allocated as of each dividend
         payment date to the Other Investments Accounts of Participants who are
         employees on the payment date and who have an Other Investments Account
         balance on such date. Such distribution or allocation will be made to
         each such Participant in the ratio that the Participant's Total
         Compensation for the Plan Year ended on or immediately preceding the
         payment date for such dividend bears to the Total Compensation for such
         year of all other Participants eligible to receive an allocation or
         distribution of such dividend."

The Plan shall remain the same in all other particulars.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation, by its officers thereunder duly authorized,
adopts this Fourth Amendment this 25th day of March 2004, but effective as of
the date specified above.

                                             MONROE BANCORP


                                             By: /s/ Mark D. Bradford
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Mark D. Bradford, President/CEO
ATTEST:

/s/ R. Scott Walters
---------------------------
R. Scott Walters, Secretary
#### WESTWAY THEATRE, Inc., v. TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORPORATION et al.

No. 4655.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 9, 1940.

Edgar Allan Poe, Jr., and Edgar Allan Poe, both of Baltimore, Md., for appellant.

James Piper and Charles G. Page, both of Baltimore, Md. (R. Dorsey Watkins, J. Calvin Carney, and Piper, Watkins & Avirett, all of Baltimore, Md., and John Fletcher Caskey, Edward C. Raftery, C. Stanley Thompson, and Charles F. Young, all of New York City, on the brief), for appellees.

Before PARKER, SOPER, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case, 30 F.Supp. 830, is affirmed upon the grounds set out in the opinion of the District Judge.

Affirmed.
# Redirecting...

Click here if you are not redirected.
#### ADCOCK v. HATLEY et ux.

No. 2262.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

May 1, 1942.

Y. W. Holmes, of Comanche, for appellant.

Fred O. Jaye, of De Leon, and C. C. Hampton, of Comanche, for appellee^.

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

L. B. Adcock instituted this suit against J. L. and Ola Hatley, alleging them to be husband and wife, and jointly and severally liable to him on a promissory note due April I, 1941. He alleges the note was executed to him by them in renewal and extension of a past due obligation. J. L. Hatley filed a plea of non est factum, and Ola Hatley claimed nonliability under a plea of cover-ture. The trial was before the court without a jury, and judgment went in favor of the defendants. There is no statement of facts in the record, but the transcript contains findings of fact and conclusions of law requested by plaintiff.

The appellant, plaintiff below, concedes that the plea of coverture is well taken, and no appeal is prosecuted from that part of the judgment. From the judgment in other respects the plaintiff appeals.

In substance, the court’s findings show that the wife signed her name and that of her husband to the note and delivered it to the plaintiff; that they were then living together as husband and wife; that Adcock knew and consented at the time for the wife to sign her husband’s name to the note and mortgage. The trial court further finds that the husband, J. L. Hatley, did not'sign the note and mortgage and did not give his consent for his wife to sign his name to said instruments, and that he did not later ratify or confirm her actions in so signing his name. That the husband was not aware of her action in signing the instruments until three or four days after she had done so, and that prior to the filing of the plea of non est factum herein, neither the husband nor the wife ever notified plaintiff she had no authority to sign the instruments and that he (the husband) would not be bound thereby.

The court also found that the debt or obligation was not such “as would be binding *1018upon the defendant J. L. Hatley, her husband”.

 The note in suit was given in extension of an antecedent debt. The transaction is still between the original parties. No rights or equities of innocent third parties have accrued. The appellant concedes the general rule to be that “Mere silence or delay on the part of a principal in repudiating the unauthorized act of an agent does not necessarily amount to a ratification” etc. 2 C.J. p. 504, § 124; 2 C.J.S., Agency, § 57. The trial court specifically found against ratification on the part of J. L. Hat-ley, and this court cannot say from the “findings of fact” that the trial court’s judgment is erroneous. That is, this court cannot say that it affirmatively appears from the record that the trial court decided the case upon an erroneous conclusion of law. 3 Tex.Jur. p. 525, §§ 371, 373; p. 424, § 302. For the above reasons, and since the findings of the trial court are not challenged in the light of a statement of facts presented in this court, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70555-70556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Improving Fuel Efficiency of 
Weapons Platforms; Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Improving Fuel 
Efficiency of Weapons Platforms will meet in closed session on November 
15-16, 2000, at the Institute for Defense Analyses, 1801 N. Beauregard 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22311-1772.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting, the Task 
Force will review fuel-efficient technologies, including new or 
improved fuels, engines, Alternative Fueled Vehicles, and other 
advanced technologies and assess their operational, logistical, cost, 
and environmental impacts for a range of practical implementation 
scenarios.
    Due to critical mission requirements, there is insufficient time to 
provide timely notice required by Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 101-6.1015(b) of the GSA Final 
Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR part 101-6, which 
further requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the 
meeting of the Task Force on November 15-16, 2000.
    Persons interested in further information should call Commander 
Brian D. Hughes, USN, at (703) 695-4157.


[[Page 70556]]


    Dated: November 16, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-29932 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGMT - D.M. WURZER



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 Confidential 
  
 

 
  
 Interoffice Memorandum

  

			
	 To:
	 	 Personnel File

		
	 From:
	 	 David M. Wurzer, EVP & Chief Financial Officer

		
	 Date:
	 	 February 1, 2005

		
	 Re:
	 	 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2002


  
 I, David M. Wurzer, (“the
Executive”) signed an Employment Agreement (“the Agreement”) with my employer, CuraGen Corporation (“the Company”), on or about April 1, 2002, and subsequently signed an Addendum to the Agreement on October 31, 2003. Exhibit
A, Item 1) of the original Agreement provides that the Executive’s initial base salary shall be subject to increases by the Board of Directors, which shall review the salary periodically. Therefore, pursuant to the minutes of the January 25,
2005, Meeting of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the Executive’s 2005 base salary will be adjusted to $286,000 per year, payable in bi-weekly installments. 
  
 Unless explicitly changed in the Addendum dated October 31, 2003, all other terms of the original Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. 
  

	
	 /s/ David M. Wurzer


	David M. Wurzer
	
	 /s/ Jonathan M. Rothberg


	Jonathan M. Rothberg
Docket No. FAA-2014-0489

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Helen Tsai

613-952-4379

2/26/14 Emailed. No objection

Bombardier 

Aerospace

Chester Liburski

514-855-5001

Ext: 29036

2/26/14 No objection
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 136 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a celebration of Citizenship 

Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Ms. WATSON (for herself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. ISSA, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. ROYCE, Ms. 

JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, 

Mr. KIRK, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mr. DREIER, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, 

Mr. HONDA, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. POMEROY, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for a celebration 

of Citizenship Day. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS TO CELEBRATE 

4 CITIZENSHIP DAY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The National Korean American 

6 Service and Education Consortium (in this resolution re7 ferred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 136 IH 

1 a public event (in this resolution referred to as the 

2 ‘‘event’’) on the Capitol Grounds to celebrate Citizenship 

3 Day. 

4 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

5 September 17, 2009, or on such other day as the Speaker 

6 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

7 Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

8 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

10 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

11 Board, the event shall be— 

12 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

13 public; and 

14 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

15 Congress. 

16 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

17 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

18 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

19 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

20 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap21 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

22 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

23 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

24 for the event. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 136 IH 

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7434

CHARLES CLAUDE RAMSEY,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

KIMBERLY H. RUNION, Director of the Virginia Center for Behavioral 

Rehabilitation,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cv-00396-RBS-FBS)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Claude Ramsey, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7434 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Claude Ramsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 

self-styled motion to strike, which he filed 10 years after the district court denied relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and closed the case. We construe Ramsey’s underlying 

motion to strike as a second or successive § 2254 petition or, alternatively, a Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the denial of his initial § 2254 petition. Because 

Ramsey did not obtain prefiling authorization from this court to file such a motion, the 

district court lacked jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); United States v. McRae, 

793 F.3d 392, 397-400 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

as unnecessary, see Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009), vacate the district court’s 

order, and remand with instructions for the district court to dismiss the motion for lack of 

jurisdiction. We deny Ramsey’s motion to strike filed in this court and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7434 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit
      10.34





Action
      No. 0601 14480





**IN
      THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA**


**JUDICAL
      DISTRICT OF CALGARY**





BETWEEN:





STAR
      CAPITAL INC.




Applicant


(Respondent)





and





DEEP
      WELL
      OIL & GAS INC., DEEP WELL OIL & GAS


(ALBERTA)
      LTD., HORST A. SCHMID, DAVID ROFF,


CURTIS
      J.
      SPARROW, CYRUS SPAULDING, GARY TIGHE,


STEVE
      GAWNE, MOSES LING AND NORTHERN ALBERTA


OIL
      LTD.




Respondents


(Applicants)




BEFORE
      THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE S. L. MARTIN IN CHAMBERS at the Calgary Courts
      Centre, Calgary, Alberta, on Friday, the 7 th day of
      September, 2007.





**ORDER**





**UPON
      THE APPLICATION** of
      the
      Respondents, Deep Well Oil & Gas Inc., Deep Well Oil & Gas (Alberta)
      Ltd., Horst A. Schmid, David Roff, Curtis J. Sparrow, Cyrus Spaulding, Moses
      Ling and Northern Alberta Oil Ltd., (hereafter “These Respondents”) by Notice of
      Motion returnable September 6, 2007; **AND
      UPON** hearing
      read the Affidavit of Curtis J. Sparrow, filed; **AND
      UPON** hearing
      counsel for These Respondents and for the Applicant;









**IT
      IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECLARED THAT:**





1.
            The
                claims of Star Capital Inc. as set out in its Amended Originating
                Notice
                in this action are dismissed in their entirety as against These
                Respondents.





2.
            Star
                Capital Inc. and These Respondents shall bear their own costs of
                this
                action.





/s/
              S.
              L. MartinJ.C.Q.B.A.




**ENTERED** this
      7
      day of September, 2007







The
      Clerk
      of the Court









Action
      No. 0601 14480











IN
      THE
      COURT OF QUEEN’S


BENCH
      OF
      ALBERTA


JUDICAL
      DISTRICT OF CALGARY









BETWEEN




STAR
      CAPITAL INC.




Applicant


(Respondent)





and





DEEP
      WELL
      OIL & GAS INC., DEEP WELL OIL & GAS (ALBERTA) LTD., HORST A. SCHMID,
      DAVID ROFF, CURTIS J. SPARROW, CYRUS SPAULDING, GARY TIGHE, STEVE GAWNE, MOSES
      LING AND NORTHERN ALBERTA OIL LTD.




Respondent


(Applicants)








**ORDER**













**PARLEE
      McLaws** **LLP**


Barristers
      & Solicitors


Patent
      & Trademark Agents


1500,
      10180-101 Street


Edmonton,
      Alberta T5J 4K1


Attention:
      JEREMY H. HOCKIN


Telephone:
      (780) 423-8500


Facsimile:
      (780) 423-2870





File
      Number: **63423-6/JHH**
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the "Partnership") for the quarters ended
September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC &
Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent
            that such provisions require the audit report of Local Limited
            Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards
            of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the
            Partnership's annual financial statements and except that the Report
            is a cumulative report covering each of the quarters ended September
            30 and June 30, 2007 and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Partnership.




/s/ Thomas J. Riha
------------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date: October 5, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1047 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1047

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include, as a home 
    health service, nutritional counseling provided by or under the 
                 supervision of a registered dietitian.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

Mrs. Byrne introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
        the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to include, as a home 
    health service, nutritional counseling provided by or under the 
                 supervision of a registered dietitian.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 
1861(m) of the Social Security Act is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``and'' at the end of paragraph (6) 
        thereof,
            (2) by inserting ``and'' at the end of clause (B) of 
        paragraph (7) thereof; and
            (3) by adding after clause (7) thereof (but before the 
        phrase beginning with the words ``excluding, however,'') the 
        following new paragraph:
            ``(8) nutritional counseling provided by or under the 
        supervision of a registered dietitian;''.
    (b) The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be applicable only 
in the case of services furnished after the month which follows the 
month in which this Act is enacted.

                                 <all>
```