alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1031

To provide for the improved enforcement of the employer sanctions law,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. BEILENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on the Judiciary and Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the improved enforcement of the employer

sanctions law, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SOCIAL SECURITY

4 CARD.

5 (a) DEVELOPMENT OF NEW CARD.—Not later than

6 January 1, 1996, the Secretary of Health and Human

7 Services, acting through the Social Security Administra8 tion and in cooperation with the Attorney General and the

9 Secretary of Labor, shall consider and develop a counter10 feit-resistant social security card which contains finger-
2

HR 1031 IH

1 print identification, barcode validation, a photograph, or

2 some other identifiable feature.

3 (b) WORK AUTHORIZATION DOCUMENT.—Not later

4 than January 1, 1996, the Attorney General shall des5 ignate the social security card as the single acceptable

6 work authorization document under the Immigration Re7 form and Control Act.

Æ
exv10w19



 











Exhibit 10.19




Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.

1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan




On February 17, 2004 the Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors modified
the form of Director compensation. Directors are now required to receive at least 50 percent of
their annual retainer in the form of Company stock, under the Alaska Communications Systems Group,
Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan. Directors retained the opportunity to be
compensated up to 100 percent in Company stock and also retained the opportunity to defer their
compensation.




 









 













ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.

2005 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

PARTICIPANT SHARE ELECTION FORM




Following are my elections under the Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan (“Plan”).




Form of Payment

I elect to receive my fees as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	o 50% shares of stock, 50% cash
	 	o 100% shares of stock
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	o 75% shares of stock, 25% cash	 	 












Delivery Options

I elect compensation delivery as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Directly to me	 	Defer
	

	 	o 100% of all
	 	o 100% of all
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	o Cash ___%
	 	o Cash ___%
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	o Shares ___%
	 	o Shares ___%






Distribution of Deferred Compensation

I elect to have my deferred account balance(s), if any, delivered as follows (check one):




	 	 	 
	

	 	o In a single lump sum
	

	 	o In ___(list number not less than two or more than fifteen) annual installments












Certification

I understand that the choices I make relative to the amounts I defer and the methods of payments
are irrevocable. Future elections may change the choice as to future deferrals only. I further
understand that distribution form my Share Account, if any, will be in whole shares of common
stock; a fractional share will be paid in cash. The foregoing elections will remains in effect
until later changed by me in writing or otherwise changed in accordance with the terms of the Plan.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:

	 	_______________________________________
	 	Date
	 	_______
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	_______________________________________________________
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Address:	 	_______________________________________________________
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	_______________________________________________________
	Phone:	 	_______________________________________________________
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Ernesto Mitchell-Benetiz, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion to renew and to suppress denied and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion to reopen the suppression hearing. The court may grant a motion to renew a suppression motion "upon a showing by the defendant, that additional pertinent facts have been discovered by the defendant which he could not have discovered with reasonable diligence before the determination of the motion” (CPL 710.40 [4]). Here, the additional facts relied upon by defendant in support of his motion were within his knowledge at the time of the first hearing and, thus, did not constitute newly discovered evidence. On the motion to renew, defendant submitted affidavits from two eyewitnesses who gave an account of defendant’s arrest that was contrary to the account testified to by the arresting officers at the first hearing. Although he had not testified at the first hearing, defendant testified at the new hearing to the same account of the arrest as given by the two eyewitnesses. Because defendant had knowledge of the facts surrounding his arrest, those facts may not be considered "additional pertinent facts * * * discovered by the defendant which he could not have discovered with reasonable diligence before the determination of the motion” (CPL 710.40 [4]). Moreover, the record reveals that defendant did not make any attempt to locate eyewitnesses to his arrest until after the first decision on the motion was rendered and after he had retained a new attorney. Thus, he made no showing that he could not have obtained the testimony of the eyewitnesses at the first hearing had he made a diligent effort to locate witnesses before the first hearing *(see, People v Latella,*112 AD2d 321, 323). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—dismiss indictment.) Present—Den-man, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the "Partnership") for the quarters ended
December 31, 2006, September 30 2006 and June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
                  to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of
                  Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the
                  auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
                  Board for the Partnership's annual financial statements and
                  except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of
                  the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2006
                  and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 5, 2009
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Lynch, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                     |       |
|--------------------------|------------|
| /s/  James F. Lynch      |       |
| **James F. Lynch**       | ** ** |
| Chief  Executive Officer |       |
|                     |       |

August 9, 2005
Anthony J. Pucciarella

ALARIS

PO Box 1835

Lusby, MD 20657

240.538.8444

Tony@TeamAlaris.com

12 October 2015

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Links to DJI Manuals for 333 Petition Docket No. FAA-2015-4165

Dear Sir or Madam:

Please accept this letter as documentation to support Docket FAA-2015-4165. Some of the 

manuals for the systems requested are too large to upload to the Docket on Regulations.gov. 

Specifically, an error occurred during upload stating that the maximum file size for upload was 

10MB. The files below exceed that limitation. While all the manuals listed below have been 

submitted on previously approved petitions, I have included internet links in the event they are 

needed. 

DJI Inspire 1 User Manual -

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf

DJI Inspire 1 Quick Start Guide 

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_Quick_Start_Guide_v1.4_en.pdf

DJI Phantom 3 Professional User Manual –

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.4_en_0915.pdf

DJI Phantom 3 Professional Quick Start Guide -

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_Quick_Start_Guide_en_v1.2.pdf

Please contact me at your earliest convenience if there are any questions. 

Sincerely,

Anthony J. Pucciarella

ALARIS
JAMES TYLER III

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2721

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

James Tyler III, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the "Partnership") for the quarters ended
September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC &
Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent
            that such provisions require the audit report of Local Limited
            Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards
            of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the
            Partnership's annual financial statements and except that the Report
            is a cumulative report covering each of the quarters ended September
            30 and June 30, 2007 and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Partnership.




/s/ Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
--------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date: October 5, 2009
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 39 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 5, 2009, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des-
2 

•HCON 39 EH 

1 ignate, the 2009 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

2 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

3 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

4 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

5 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum6 mer games. 

7 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

8 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

9 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

10 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA11 TIONS. 

12 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

13 for physical preparations for the event. 

14 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

15 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce16 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

17 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise18 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

19 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

20 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 39 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

forcement Torch Run. District of Columbia Special Olympics Law En-
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.



|Date:
    May 23, 2016 | By: | /s/
    Uri Tadelis
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------
|                       |     | Uri
    Tadelis    
|                       |     | CEO                



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,957
<SECURITIES>                                    13,231
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                       510
<INVENTORY>                                        231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,167
<PP&E>                                           2,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,098
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,061
<SALES>                                          8,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,225
<CGS>                                            2,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     37
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 37
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        37
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
À“×Ã¤‹ ÕÃflÃ¤Õ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ

⁄—Œ Ãÿ¤ “×“Ãÿ ›×Œ›À×Ã

“flŒ×“‹¤Œ Õ×“Ÿÿ fiÿÀ‘‘flŒÙ

 –a ̈· ̈·±2aÆÙ

TMÚ

¤Œ×› ÿÚ ÿ—‘‹¤ŒÙ ÷ÆÚÙ fl ̈ ̈±Æ2aß Ÿa2aÆø¥Ù

 Œa­°±2oa2 ̈Ú

“±Ú ðÈÛÈÌðÈÁ

fl1a21⁄2ß “±Ú flðÈÁÛÓËÁÛÈÎð

—Œ‹¤Œ

fiao±ÆaÊ fl‘flŒ›M“Ù ‘¤fl «Ù ø2o ŸŒflfi¤ŒÙ ›·Æ1⁄2 ́· ̈ ÷ ́o1a­Ú

fi ̧ ́¥¥øÆé­ °a ̈· ̈·±2 o±Æ °ø2a¥ Æa ̧aøÆ·21 ·­ 1Æø2 ̈aoÚ

Ã ̧a 3a3±Æø2o ́3 o·­°±­· ̈·±2 o·¥ao ±2 ÷ ́¥ß ÔÏÙ ÓðÔðÙ ·­ ©· ̈ ̧oÆø©2Ú fl

Æa°¥ø1⁄2a3a2 ̈ 3a3±Æø2o ́3 o·­°±­· ̈·±2 ·­ æa·21 o·¥ao 1⁄2±21⁄2 ́ÆÆa2 ̈¥ß ©· ̈ ̧  ̈ ̧·­ ±ÆoaÆÚ 

⁄×‘¤‹

‹¤› ÔÍ ÓðÔð

”—‘‘« ›Ú ‹...«¤ŒÙ ›‘¤Œ’

ÀÚÕÚ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ
Ã ̧·­ o·­°±­· ̈·±2 ·­ 2± ̈ ø°°Æ±°Æ·ø ̈a o±Æ ° ́æ¥·1⁄2ø ̈·±2 ø2o ·­ 2± ̈ °Æa1⁄2aoa2 ̈ ˆ

a®1⁄2a° ̈ ø­ °Æ±TM·oao æß Á ̈ ̧ ›·ÆÚ ŒÚ ÌÍÛÌÚ

Ã ̧a °ø2a¥  ́2ø2·3± ́­¥ß 1⁄2±21⁄2¥ ́oa­  ̈ ̧·­ 1⁄2ø­a ·­ ­ ́· ̈øæ¥a o±Æ oa1⁄2·­·±2 ˆˆ

©· ̈ ̧± ́ ̈ ±Æø¥ øÆ1 ́3a2 ̈Ú Õaa ⁄aoÚ ŒÚ fl°°Ú –Ú ÌÏ ̄ø ̃ ̄Ó ̃Ú

“—Ã ⁄—Œ –Àfi‘×›flÃ×—“

À“×Ã¤‹ ÕÃflÃ¤Õ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ

⁄—Œ Ãÿ¤ “×“Ãÿ ›×Œ›À×Ã

“flŒ×“‹¤Œ Õ×“Ÿÿ fiÿÀ‘‘flŒÙ

 –a ̈· ̈·±2aÆÙ

TMÚ

¤Œ×› ÿÚ ÿ—‘‹¤ŒÙ ÷ÆÚÙ fl ̈ ̈±Æ2aß Ÿa2aÆø¥Ù

 Œa­°±2oa2 ̈Ú

“±Ú ðÈÛÈÌðÈÁ

fl1a21⁄2ß “±Ú flðÈÁÛÓËÁÛÈÎð

”¤”—Œfl“‹À”ˆ

—2 –a ̈· ̈·±2 o±Æ ŒaTM·a© ±o ø2 —ÆoaÆ ±o  ̈ ̧a

fi±øÆo ±o ×33·1Æø ̈·±2 fl°°aø¥­

Õ ́æ3· ̈ ̈ao ÷ ́2a ÓÁÙ ÓðÔðˆˆ 

fiao±ÆaÊ fl‘flŒ›M“Ù ‘¤fl «Ù ø2o ŸŒflfi¤ŒÙ ›·Æ1⁄2 ́· ̈ ÷ ́o1a­Ú

“øÆ·2oaÆ Õ·21 ̧ fi ̧ ́¥¥øÆÙ ø 2ø ̈·TMa ø2o 1⁄2· ̈·¶a2 ±o ×2o·øÙ °a ̈· ̈·±2­ o±Æ ÆaTM·a© ±o

 ̈ ̧a fi±øÆo ±o ×33·1Æø ̈·±2 fl°°aø¥­é ±ÆoaÆ o·­3·­­·21  ̧·­ ø°°aø¥ oÆ±3 ø2

·33·1Æø ̈·±2 ¶ ́o1aé­ oa1⁄2·­·±2 oa2ß·21  ̧·­ ø°°¥·1⁄2ø ̈·±2 o±Æ ø­ß¥ ́3Ù ©· ̈ ̧ ̧±¥o·21 ±o

Æa3±TMø¥Ù ø2o °Æ± ̈a1⁄2 ̈·±2  ́2oaÆ  ̈ ̧a ›±2TMa2 ̈·±2 fl1ø·2­ ̈ Ã±Æ ̈ ́Æa  ̄ç›flÃå ̃Ú ...a  ̧øTMa

⁄×‘¤‹

‹¤› ÔÍ ÓðÔð

”—‘‘« ›Ú ‹...«¤ŒÙ ›‘¤Œ’

ÀÚÕÚ ›—ÀŒÃ —⁄ fl––¤fl‘Õ
Ó ðÈÛÈÌðÈÁ

¶ ́Æ·­o·1⁄2 ̈·±2  ́2oaÆ Ë ÀÚÕÚ›Ú y ÔÓÎÓÚ ...a ÆaTM·a© o±Æ ­ ́æ­ ̈ø2 ̈·ø¥ aTM·oa21⁄2aÙ ÿ ́­ßaTM TMÚ

” ́μø­aßÙ ÎÓË ⁄ÚÌo ÔÔÈÓÙ ÔÔÈÈ  ̄Á ̈ ̧ ›·ÆÚ ÓððË ̃Ù ø2o ©a oa2ß  ̈ ̧a °a ̈· ̈·±2Ú 

Õ ́æ­ ̈ø2 ̈·ø¥ aTM·oa21⁄2a ­ ́°°±Æ ̈­  ̈ ̧a ø1a21⁄2ßé­ øoTMaÆ­a 1⁄2Æao·æ·¥· ̈ß oa ̈aÆ3·2ø ̈·±2

æø­ao ±2  ̈ ̧a ·3°¥ø ́­·æ·¥· ̈ß ±o fi ̧ ́¥¥øÆé­ o±1⁄2 ́3a2 ̈­ æa·21 °Æa°øÆao ±Æ·1·2ø¥¥ß ·2

¤21¥·­ ̧Ù ø­ ©a¥¥ ø­  ̈ ̧a ·21⁄2±2­·­ ̈a21⁄2ß æa ̈©aa2 fi ̧ ́¥¥øÆé­  ̈a­ ̈·3±2ß  ̈ ̧ø ̈  ̧a 1⁄2± ́¥o

o·­1 ́·­a  ̧·3­a¥o ø­ ø 3±2μ æa1⁄2ø ́­a  ̧a 1⁄2± ́¥o ­°aøμ æ± ̈ ̧ ÿ·2o· ø2o – ́2¶øæ·Ù ø2o  ̧·­

ø°°¥·1⁄2ø ̈·±2 ­ ̈ø ̈·21  ̈ ̧ø ̈  ̧a ­°±μa ±2¥ß – ́2¶øæ·Ú Õaa ‹±2 TMÚ Ÿ±2¶ø¥a­Ù ÏÈÍ ⁄ÚÌo

ÈÌËÙ ÈÏÌ  ̄Á ̈ ̧ ›·ÆÚ ÓððÈ ̃Ú ×2  ̈ ̧a øæ­a21⁄2a ±o 1⁄2Æao·æ¥a  ̈a­ ̈·3±2ßÙ fi ̧ ́¥¥øÆé­ ø­ß¥ ́3

ø2o ©· ̈ ̧ ̧±¥o·21 ±o Æa3±TMø¥ 1⁄2¥ø·3­ oø·¥Ú Õaa ⁄øÆø ̧ TMÚ fl­ ̧1⁄2Æ±o ̈Ù ÌÏË ⁄ÚÌo ÔÔÎÌÙ

ÔÔÎÍ  ̄Á ̈ ̧ ›·ÆÚ ÓððÌ ̃Ú 

fia1⁄2ø ́­a fi ̧ ́¥¥øÆé­ ›flÃ 1⁄2¥ø·3 ·­ æø­ao ±2  ̈ ̧a ­ø3a ­ ̈ø ̈a3a2 ̈­ o± ́2o  ̈± æa

2± ̈ 1⁄2Æao·æ¥aÙ ø2o  ̧a o±a­ 2± ̈ °±·2 ̈  ̈± ø2ß ± ̈ ̧aÆ aTM·oa21⁄2a ·2  ̈ ̧a Æa1⁄2±Æo  ̈ ̧ø ̈ 1⁄2±3°a¥­

 ̈ ̧a 1⁄2±21⁄2¥ ́­·±2  ̈ ̧ø ̈ · ̈ ·­ 3±Æa ¥·μa¥ß  ̈ ̧ø2 2± ̈  ̈ ̧ø ̈  ̧a ©± ́¥o æa  ̈±Æ ̈ ́Æao ·o Æa ̈ ́Æ2ao  ̈±

×2o·øÙ ­ ́æ­ ̈ø2 ̈·ø¥ aTM·oa21⁄2a ­ ́°°±Æ ̈­  ̈ ̧a ø1a21⁄2ßé­ oa2·ø¥ ±o ›flÃÚ Õaa ·oÚ ø ̈

ÔÔÎÍÛÎÈÚ

–¤Ã×Ã×—“ ⁄—Œ Œ¤ ×¤... ‹¤“×¤‹Ú
Motions Granted and Order filed September 20, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00176

- CR NO. 14

- 16

- 00177

- CR NO. 14

- 16

- 00178

- CR

____________ JASSSAN RASHAAD HUGHES , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1413584, 1392199, 1413583



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the se appeal s are wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED

.
Accord ingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 174th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record s in accordance with local procedure; that2

the clerk of that court furnish the record s to appellant on or before October 5, 2016 ; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record s to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within 30 days of that date.

PER CURIAM
#### Michael Ceravolo et al., Respondents, v Sunnyside Market, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Borden, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (And Two Other Third-Party Actions.)

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant Borden, Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated November 29, 1988, as denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*410The third-party defendant, Borden, Inc. (hereinafter Borden), asserts that, upon their motion to have the complaint in the main action restored to the Trial Calendar, the plaintiffs failed to make a sufficient showing of the merits of their claims and that the complaint should have been dismissed. We disagree. Upon an examination of the complaint and a review of the affidavit of merit submitted by the plaintiff Michael Ceravolo, we cannot conclude that there is no merit to the plaintiffs’ action under any of the theories set forth in the complaint. Accordingly, we find that the Supreme Court properly declined to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404 and properly restored the action to the Trial Calendar. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Case 4:22-cr-00314-O Document 23 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
Case 4:22-cr-00314-O Document 23 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46