alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Amendment to the Anthem Cash Balance Pension Plan



 Exhibit 10.23 (i) 
  
 NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 ANTHEM 401(k) LONG TERM SAVINGS INVESTMENT PLAN 
  
 Pursuant to rights reserved under Article X of the Anthem 401(k) Long Term Savings Investment Plan (as last restated effective January 1, 1997) (the “Plan”), Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. amends the Plan,
effective with respect to distributions of benefits on or after March 28, 2005, as follows. 
  
 Section 6.6(d) of the Plan shall be amended by adding to the end thereof the following sentence: 
  
 In the event of a mandatory distribution greater than $1,000 in accordance with the provisions of this Section 6.6(d), if the Participant does not elect
to have such distribution paid directly into an eligible retirement plan specified by the Participant in a direct rollover or to receive the distribution directly, then the Pension Committee shall pay the distribution in a direct rollover to an
individual retirement plan designated by the Pension Committee. 
  
 This Ninth Amendment has been executed this 24th day of March, 2005. 
  

			
	 ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC.

		
	By:	 	/S/    RANDY BROWN    
	 	 	Chairman of the Anthem Pension Committee
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1410

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the deduction

for State and local income and franchise taxes shall not be allocated

to foreign source income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1993

Mr. THOMAS of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the deduction for State and local income and franchise taxes shall not be allocated to foreign source income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALLOCATION OF DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND

4 LOCAL INCOME AND FRANCHISE TAXES FOR

5 FOREIGN TAX CREDIT PURPOSES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 904 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to taxable
2

•HR 1410 IH

1 income for purpose of computing limitation) is amended

2 by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(5) DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND LOCAL IN4 COME AND FRANCHISE TAXES.—For purposes of

5 computing taxable income under this subpart, any

6 deduction for any State or local income or franchise

7 tax shall not be allocated or apportioned to gross in8 come from sources without the United States.’’

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

11 December 31, 1976.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56626-56627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22582]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2012-OS-0110]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Defense, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense is deleting a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective on October 15, 2012 
unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before October 15, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Cindy Allard at (571) 372-0461.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The 
proposed deletion is not

[[Page 56627]]

within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: September 10, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletion:
DPA DXA.C 09
    Public Correspondence Files (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10227).
    Reason: Based on a recent review of systems of records notice DPA 
DXA.C 09, Public Correspondence Files, it has been determined the 
program never retrieved correspondence by name and therefore this 
system was never used and can be deleted.
[FR Doc. 2012-22582 Filed 9-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
<PAGE>

              WORLDWIDE RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



                                   EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-38412, 333-47659, and 333-476661 of Worldwide Restaurant Concepts, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated June 24, 2003 (July 15, 2003 as to the fifth
paragraph of Note 6), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Worldwide
Restaurant Concepts, Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2003.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California

July 15, 2003
House Calendar No. 34

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345

[Report No. 103–71]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 280

and Federal Building’’.‘‘Robert F. Peckham United States CourthouseSouth First Street in San Jose, California, as the

APRIL 29, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 34

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345

[Report No. 103–71]

To designate the Federal building located at 280 South First Street in

San Jose, California, as the ‘‘Robert F. Peckham United States Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. MINETA (for himself and Mr. EDWARDS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and

Transportation

APRIL 29, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 280 South

First Street in San Jose, California, as the ‘‘Robert

F. Peckham United States Courthouse and Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1345 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 280 South First

3 Street in San Jose, California, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Robert F. Peckham United States Court5 house and Federal Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Robert F. Peckham United States

11 Courthouse and Federal Building’’.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2655
EARL SIMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COASTAL CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-94-2486-9-19) Submitted: January 30, 1996 Decided: March 5, 1996 Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Hugh Infinger, DUKES, WILLIAMS, INFINGER & MEEKS, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant on his Title VII claim alleging racial discrimination. Specifically, Appellant alleged that hissupervisor called him "Shiny," and questioned his ability to perform construction work. Appellant conceded that he had never heard the word "Shiny" used to mean any kind of insult, but assumed that it was a racial slur. He therefore felt compelled to quit. We find that the facts of this case are insufficient to create an abusivework environment or make conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person would feel co mpelled to resign. Accordingly we find that Appellant is unable to prevail on either a hostile racial work environment or constructive discharge claim. See Meritor Sav. Bank, F.S.B. v. Vinson , 477 U.S. 57, 67 (1986) (providing standard for hostile sexual work environment claim); see also Amirmokri v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. , 60 F.3d 1126, 1132 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard for constructive discharge claim). We therefore affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment for the Defendant. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cue Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Daniel R. Passeri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kerri-Ann Millar,Vice President, Finance and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CueBiopharma, Inc. and will be retained by Cue Biopharma, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

/s/ Daniel R. Passeri
  
/s/ Kerri-Ann Millar
Name: Daniel R. Passeri  Name: Kerri-Ann MillarTitle: Chief Executive Officer  Title: Vice President, Finance(Principal Executive Officer)  (Principal Accounting Officer)Date: March 12, 2020  Date: March 12, 2020**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        472
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 6,538
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     26,077
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       26,333
<LOANS>                                    49,636
<ALLOWANCE>                                   387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             86,307
<DEPOSITS>                                 54,844
<SHORT-TERM>                                    0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           807
<LONG-TERM>                                15,966
<COMMON>                                       14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 14,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             86,307
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             2,059
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           1,087
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               48
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            3,194
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          1,224
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,727
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       1,467
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  18
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             16
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               687
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    474
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               3.46
<LOANS-NON>                                    33
<LOANS-PAST>                                   78
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              372
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   3
<RECOVERIES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             387
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       387
        

</TABLE>
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 25915.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

On State’s Motion for Rehearing.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The original opinion is withdrawn.

Appellant was tried and convicted in the County Court of Scurry County for possessing whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area.

Trial was had before the same special judge and under the same circumstances as existed in Bates v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 248 S.W.2d 947.

As in the Bates case, the record does not show that the special judge was legally authorized to preside over the trial.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### BLEEKER et al. v. STATE.

No. 20879.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 20, 1940.

Otto Mullinax, of Winnsboro, and Chris Dixie and Mandell & Combs, all of Houston, for appellants.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, confinement in jail for ninety days.

J. W. “Smokey” Cain v. State of Texas, 138 S.W.2d 102, this day delivered, and the appeal herein present companion cases. The appellants herein were convicted upon the theory that they acted with J. W. *“Smokey”*Cain in *committing 'an aggravated.*assault on H. E. Abernathy. The complaint and information are identical with those shown in the companion case. The description of the wounds Mr. Abernathy received is the same as that disclosed by the testimony in the companion case. In short, the records are in the same attitude. The companion case was reversed because of the failure of the testimony to show that the wounds inflicted upon the injured party were serious. Following the holding there, we are constrained to reverse the judgment herein.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. •

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BWAY Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
December 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin C. Kern, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                                     
|Kevin C. Kern Chief Financial Officer February 4, 2003
STAN STANART

COUNTY CLERK, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

PROBATE COURTS DEPARTMENT

0f OCTOBER, 2015

CLERK OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT (CIVIL APPEAL)

301 FANNIN STREET

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002ESTATE

OF: BARBARA KELLEY JOSTE,

DECEASED

CAUSE NO.: 295,986-401

DONNA KOHLHAUSEN, AS INDEPENDENT PROBATE COURT NO. TWO

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

VALLEYSSAJOSTECERRA

APPELLANT

BRIAN KEITH BAXENDALE, AS INDEPENDENT TINA WHITE,

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF KELLEY COURT REPORTER

WILLIAM JOSTE AKA KELLEY JOSTE

APPELLEEAPPELLAN

T OF RECORD

NAME: R. MARRS

ADDRESS: 500 DALLAS STREET, SUITE 1350

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

713-609-9503

FAX 713-583-5825

EMAIL ADDRESS: JMARRS

TEXAS STATE 24037029

ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR APPELLEE

NAME: JAMES H.

ADDRESS: 1400 WOODLOCH FOREST DRIVE, STE. 590

THE WOODLANDS, TEXAS 77380

281 -419-6200

FAX 281-419-0250

EMAIL ADDRESS: JAMES @MESLAWFIRM.COM

TEXAS STATE 00794697

1

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/23/2015 3:11:45 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
DATE OF JUDGMENT; OCTOBER 2015

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL FILED BY APPELLEE;

CROSS-MOTION FOR N.O.V. AND NEW TRIAL

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW

MOTION FOR MISTRIAL

RY TRIAL:

APPEALS CONSOLIDATED UNDER THIS CAUSE;

COMPANION CASES;

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED ON; OCTOBER 2015

WW

STAN STANART,

Harris Clerk

/S/ ALIESA M. MCLEOD

ALIESA M. MCLEOD, DEPUTY

Pr0bate C0urts Department

SS/AMM

2
PROBATECOURT2

' AM

Stan

HarrisCounty

CauseNo.295986-401

DONNAKOHLHAUSEN, § INTHEPROBATECOURT

Independent Executor oftheEstateof

ValleyssaJosteCerra,

§

v. § No.2

§

BRIANKEITHBAXENDALE,as §

Independent Executor oftheEstateof §

KelleyWilliamJosteakaWilliamKelley §

Joste, §

§ OFHARRISCOUNTY,TEXAS

NOTICEOFAPPEAL

DonnaKohlhausen, asIndependentExecutoroftheEstateofValleyssaJoste

Cerra appealsfromtheprobatecourt’sordergrantingDefendantBrianKeith

Baxendale,as IndependentExecutorof the Estateof KelleyWilliam motionfor

summaryjudgmentsignedonAugust11,2015,theprobatecourt’sorderdenyingPlaintiff’s

motionforreconsiderationsignedonOctober6,2015,andalladverseinterlocutory rulings

thatmergedintothejudgment. PlaintifftakesthisappealtoeithertheFirstorFourteenthCourt

ofAppeals.Plaintiff

respectfullyasksthetrialclerkto senda copyof thisnoticeof appeal

immediately totheappellatecourtclerkandtothe responsibleforpreparingthe

reporter’srecord.

_

1

3
Respectfully submitted,

ELLIS& LLP

/s/ R.Marrs

JosephR.

No.24037029

LeahK.

StateBarNo.24080068

Dallas Suite1350

Houston, Texas77002

(713)609-9503

(713)583-5825fax

ofthe 0f

4
CERTIFICATE OFSERVICE

ThisistocertifythatonOctober21,2015,a trueandcorrectcopyoftheforegoingwas

senttothefollowing:

H.Stilwell E-Service

1400Woodloch ForestDrive,Ste.590

TheWoodlands, TX77380

(281)419-6200

i

/s/ R.Marrs

JosephR.Marrs1

5
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sean B. OConnor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 5, 2008 |  |  |  |                        
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ Sean B. OConnor   
|                       |  |  |  | Sean B. OConnor       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Noel P., a Child Alleged to be Abused.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Genesee County Family Court, Graney, J. (Appeal from order of Genesee County Family Court, Graney, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DONALD GENE BLANTON, §

#01307891, §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Case 3:22-CV-1411-B-BK

 §

TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL §

APPEALS, ET AL., §

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 19 day of August, 2022. th

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01411-B-BK Document 5 Filed 08/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 25
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7340

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
PAULETTE JACKSON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 3:19

- cr - 00020

- JAG

- 1 )

Submitted : February 28, 2022 Decided: March 17, 2022

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Paulette Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Paulette Jackson appeals the district co urt’s order denying her motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Jackson , No. 3:1 9

- cr - 00020

- JAG

- 1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2021) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED