alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dale R. Black., the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|            |  |                                                        
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|May 5, 2006 |  | /S/ DALE R. BLACK                                      
|            |  | Dale R. Black                                          
|            |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
|            |  | Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.                      



|            |  |                                                                                                   
|----------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 5, 2006 |  | /S/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                 
|            |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                     
|            |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.



|            |  |                                                                                                  
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 5, 2006 |  | /S/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                
|            |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                    
|            |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1170

To extend until June 1, 1996, the authority of the President to enter into

certain trade agreements and to apply Congressional ‘‘fast track’’ procedures to bills implementing such agreements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. KOLBE introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Ways and Means and Rules

A BILL

To extend until June 1, 1996, the authority of the President

to enter into certain trade agreements and to apply Congressional ‘‘fast track’’ procedures to bills implementing

such agreements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TRADE AGREEMENT NEGOTIAT4 ING AUTHORITY.

5 Section 1102 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitive6 ness Act of 1988 (19 U.S.C. 2902) is amended as follows:

7 (1) Subsection (a)(1)(A) (relating to agree8 ments regarding tariff barriers) is amended by strik-
2

•HR 1170 IH

1 ing out ‘‘June 1, 1993,’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1,

2 1996,’’.

3 (2) Subsection (b)(1) (relating to agreements

4 regarding nontariff barriers) is amended by striking

5 out ‘‘June 1, 1993,’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1, 1996,’’.

6 (3) Subsection (c)(1) (relating to bilateral

7 agreements regarding tariff and nontariff barriers)

8 is amended by striking out ‘‘June 1, 1993,’’ and in9 serting ‘‘June 1, 1996,’’.

10 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF ‘‘FAST TRACK’’ PROCEDURES.

11 Section 1103(b) of the Omnibus Trade and Competi12 tiveness Act of 1988 (19 U.S.C. 2903(b)) is amended to

13 read as follows:

14 ‘‘(b) APPLICATION OF CONGRESSIONAL ‘FAST

15 TRACK’ PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENTING BILLS.—

16 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para17 graph (2) and subsection (c), the provisions of sec18 tion 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 (hereinafter in

19 this section referred to as ‘fast track procedures’)

20 apply to implementing bills submitted with respect

21 to trade agreements entered into under section

22 1102(b) or (c) before June 1, 1996.

23 ‘‘(2) URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS.—In the

24 case of any trade agreement entered into under sec25 tion 1102(b) pursuant to the Uruguay Round of
3

•HR 1170 IH

1 trade negotiations under the auspices of the General

2 Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, the fast track pro3 cedures shall apply to such agreement only if it is

4 entered into before December 1, 1993.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30130]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Open Meeting

    The Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee will 
meet on December 12, 2000, 9 a.m., Room 3884, in the Herbert C. Hoover 
Building, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues NW, 
Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Export Administration on implementation of the Export 
Administration Regulations (EAR) and provides for continuing review to 
update the EAR as needed.

Agenda

    1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
    2. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
    3. Update on pending regulations.
    4. Discussion of deemed export rule.
    5. Discussion of anti-boycott regulations.
    6. Roundtable discussion with Bureau of Export Administration 
officials.
    7. Election of Chair and Vice Chair.

    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials, two weeks 
prior to the meeting date, to the following address: Ms. Lee Ann 
Carpenter, OSIES/EA/BXA MS: 3876, 14th St. & Constitution Ave. NW, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230.
    For more information or copies of the minutes, contact Lee Ann 
Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: November 20, 2000.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30130 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
**From** : Robin Dunkins [ mailto:Dunkins.Robin@epamail.epa.gov ]

**Sent** : Friday , July

27, 2012 09:06 AM **To** : Frey , Nathan J.; Frey, Nathan J. **Cc** : John Bradfield < Bradfield.John@epamail.epa.gov >; Bill Schrock < Schrock.Bill@epamail.epa.gov >; Karen Thundiyil < Thundi yi l.Karen@epamail.epa.gov >; Scott Jordan < Jordan.Scott@epamail.epa.gov >; Steve Fruh < fruh.steve@epa.gov > **Subject** : Fw: Package For OMB Nathan, Please find our final draft for the Pulp and Paper Subpart S RTR. Per our earlier discussion, we had a few additional edits to the version you approved. Please let me know if you have an y additional comments on our edits. Also, let me know when you are ready for us to upload to ROCI S. You can reach me b y cell ph one today at 919

- 541

- 5335 or John Bradfield in the office at 919

- 541

- 3062. Thanks Robin Robin Dunkins, L eader, Natural Resources and Commerce Group US Environmental Protection Agency 919

- 541

- 5335
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1041

To amend title 39, United States Code, to permit essential civilians supporting

military operations, in an overseas area designated by the President,

to mail at no cost letters or recorded communications of a personal

nature.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mrs. BYRNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to permit essential

civilians supporting military operations, in an overseas

area designated by the President, to mail at no cost

letters or recorded communications of a personal nature.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN PERSONAL MAIL IN

4 OVERSEAS MILITARY THEATERS OF OPER5 ATION.

6 Section 3401(a)(1) of title 39, United States Code,

7 is amended—
2

HR 1041 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘or a civilian who otherwise is

2 authorized to use postal services at Armed Forces

3 installations and who the military theater com4 mander designates as in support of military oper5 ations,’’ after ‘‘a member of the Armed Forces of

6 the United States on active duty, as defined in sec7 tion 101 (4) and (22) of title 10,’’;

8 (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘by the

9 member’’; and

10 (3) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘or civil11 ian’’ after ‘‘the member’’.

Æ
PROMEDCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
EXHIBIT 11
Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                                      March 31,           
                                                                                1999             1998     
<S>                                                                        <C>               <C>
BASIC
         Weighted average shares outstanding                                  21,043,846        12,788,615
         Contingently issuable shares in business combinations                   412,770           827,272
                                                                           -------------     -------------
         Number of common shares outstanding                                  21,456,616        13,615,887
                                                                           =============     =============

DILUTED
         Weighted average shares outstanding                                  21,043,846        12,788,615
         Contingently issuable shares in business combinations                   412,770           827,272
         Net common shares issuable on exercise of certain stock
              options and warrants (1)                                         1,735,997         2,874,964
         Other dilutive securities                                                -                 -     
                                                                           -------------     -------------
         Number of common shares outstanding                                  23,192,613        16,490,851
                                                                           =============     =============
</TABLE>


(1)  Net common  shares  issuable  on  exercise  of certain  stock  options  and
     warrants is calculated based on the treasury stock method
#### WHITEHURST v. STATE.

No. 21184.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

Shead & Smith, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before u’s without a statement of facts or bills of exception. -No-question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HCS REAL ESTATE LLC §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-866-Y

§

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE §

COMPANY CO/DEPOSITORS §

INSURANCE COMPANY §

ORDER TO FILE DISMISSAL DOCUMENTS

The Court has been informed by the defendant that the abovestyled and -numbered cause of action has settled. Accordingly, all

deadlines are STAYED until further order of the Court. The parties

are directed to file an agreed motion to dismiss or stipulation of

dismissal due to settlement no later than July 18, 2023.

SIGNED June 20, 2023.

____________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00866-Y Document 27 Filed 06/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 505
* Pursuant to 5th C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50655

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIMMY DALE HENDRICK,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CR-25-1

March 24, 1999

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jimmy Dale Hendrick appeals his conviction for two counts of mail

fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Hendrick argues (1) that the

evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction

and (2) that the district court erred in finding that he was a leader

or organ izer under § 3B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The standard under which this court reviews a claim of legal

insufficiency is whether “a rational trier of fact could have found that

the evidence establishes the essential elements of the offense beyond

a reasonable dou bt.” United States v. El-Zoubi , 993 F.2d 442, 445 (5th2

Cir. 1993) (citations omitted). This standard leaves the assessment of

the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight of the evidence

within the exclusive province of the jury. S ee id. In reviewing an

insufficiency claim, we must consider the evidence in the light most

favorable to the government. See Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60,

80 (1942); United States v. Bermea , 30 F.3d 1539, 1551 (5th Cir. 1994).

After careful analysis of the record, we find that the evidence was

sufficient to support a reasonable juror’s finding of guilt beyond a

reasonable doubt on all of the essential elements of charged offense.

This Court reviews a sentencing judge’s factual findings for clear

error and the application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo

. S ee

United States v. Cihak

, 137 F.3d 252, 263 (5th Cir. 1998). A factual

finding will not be held to be clearly erroneous if it is plausible

considering the record as a whole. S ee United States v. Alford

, 142

F.3d 825, 831 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 119 S.Ct. 514 (1998). Further,

facts contained in the presentence investigation report (PSR) may be

a dopted by the district court in sentencing as long as the fact s “have

an adequate evidentiary basis and the defendant does not present

rebuttal evidence.” I d. at 832. Because Hendrick did not present any

evidence at t he sentencing hearing to rebut the facts presented in the

PSR, the district court was entitled to ado pt the facts concerning the

number of participants in the various frau dulent schemes. Therefore,

the district court did not clearly err in finding that Hendrick was the

leader or organizer of fraudulent schemes involving at least five

participants and increasing his offense level by four points pursuant

to § 3B1.1(a) of the Guidelines. S ee United States v. Boutte

, 13 F.3d3

855, 860 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the use of our report dated August 18, 1998, with respect to
the financial  statements of Celtic  Investment,  Inc. and  subsidiaries for the
years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997,  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB)
of Celtic Investments, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 1998.

      We also consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S- 8 No. 333-58409)  pertaining to Employee and Consultant Stock
Option  Agreements  and Celtic  Investment,  Inc.  1997 Stock Option Plan of our
report  dated  August  18,  1998,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements of Celtic Investments,  Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                             MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Chicago, Illinois
September 28, 1998

                                      148
Tenth Amendment of Taylor Capital Group, Inc.



 EXHIBIT 10.42 
  
 TENTH AMENDMENT OF 
 TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC. 
 PROFIT SHARING AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 
  
 (Effective as of October 1, 1998) 
  
 WHEREAS, Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the
Taylor Capital Group, Inc. Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Effective as of October 1, 1998) (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, it is now considered desirable to further amend the Plan; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the power reserved to the Company by subsection 17.1 of the Plan, and in exercise of the
authority delegated to the Committee established pursuant to Section 18 of the plan (the “Committee”) by subsection 17.1 of the Plan, effective as of December 1, 2004, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. By adding the following at the end of subsection 3.1 of
the Plan: 
  
 “Notwithstanding the above, a Participant
whose employment with the employers terminates as a result of the sale of the Cole Taylor Bank Broadview Branch shall be eligible in to share in any employer discretionary contributions and forfeitures for the Plan Year in which the sale occurs,
regardless of the number of hours worked during such Plan Year, and regardless of whether he is employed by an employer on the last day of the year, provided he is employed by an employer on the date of such sale.” 
  
 2. By adding the following at the end of subparagraph
10.2(b)(ii) of the Plan: 
  
 “Notwithstanding the above, a
Participant shall have a vested percentage of 100% if his employment terminates as a result of the sale of Cole Taylor Bank Broadview Branch and he is employed with an employer on the date of such sale.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly authorized member of the Committee
has caused the foregoing amendment to be executed this 15th day of December, 2004. 
  

	
	 /s/ MELVIN E. PEARL


	 On behalf of the Committee as Aforesaid
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Matter of the Marriage of Sadhna M. 

Patel and Seth Parrish and In the Interest of 

A.K.P.P., a Child

No. 06-21-00046-CV

Appeal from the 233rd District Court of 

Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 233-

659830-19). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter* participating. *Justice Carter, 

Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find partial error in the judgment of the 

court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s conservatorship order and remand the matter 

to the trial court for further proceedings, including consideration of what amount and kind of 

access is appropriate under the circumstances of this case and what safeguards are necessary to 

protect the child’s well-being. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s judgment.

We further order that the appellant and appellee shall each pay one-half of all costs 

incurred by reason of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 10, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1352 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1352

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify that the value 
  of certain funeral and burial arrangements are not to be considered 
  available resources under the supplemental security income program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2009

    Mr. Pomeroy (for himself, Mr. Wilson of Ohio, Mr. Tim Murphy of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, and Mr. Guthrie) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify that the value 
  of certain funeral and burial arrangements are not to be considered 
  available resources under the supplemental security income program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUNERAL AND BURIAL ARRANGEMENTS NOT CONSIDERED 
              RESOURCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1613(e)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1382b(e)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(C) If--
            ``(i) an individual or the individual's spouse enters into 
        an irrevocable contract with a provider of funeral goods and 
        services for a funeral;
            ``(ii) the individual or the individual's spouse funds the 
        contract by paying for the goods and services; and
            ``(iii)(I) the funeral provider subsequently places the 
        funds in a trust or in escrow; or
            ``(II) the individual or the individual's spouse 
        establishes an irrevocable trust, and the funeral provider is 
        the named beneficiary of the trust,
then the trust or escrow shall not be considered a resource available 
to the individual.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to payments for supplemental security income benefits under title 
XVI of the Social Security Act for months beginning 90 days or more 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```