OAR Box 1490 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

43) IV-C-16 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:47 AM Sheet 43 of 273 

P.1 
P.2 

A-94-52 

IV-C-16 

Keith Barnett 

02/22/2002 12:49 PM 

To: jschwtzr@gte.net 

cc: KRMeardon@mactec.com, Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: Revised Floors for Noncorrosion Resistant resins 

Dear John: 

Attached is an excel spreadsheets with the revised floors for noncorrosion resistant resins, the 

draft revised floor is 35 percent HAP resin and non-atomized resin application. It is interesting to 

note that this is identical to the floor for production resin in the fiberglass boat manufacturing rule. 

We believe that now combining filled and unfilled noncorrosion resistant resins is appropriate based 

on the following rationale: 

The reason that we originally split out filled and unfilled resins was that non-atomized mechanical 

resin application of filed resins was not possible, and we wanted to be able to include non-atomized 

resin application is an applicable emission reduction technique on the floor for unfilled resins. Now, 

both filled and unfilled resins can be applied using non-atomized resin application technology. So 

this reason no longer exists. 

A possible second reason to keep filled and unfilled resins separate would be that.all other things 

being equal, filled resins need a higher HAP content specifically due to the presence of the filler, and 

the effect of the filler on the handling characteristics of the resin. If that were true, combining filled 

and unfilled resins might result in a floor for filled reins that was not achievable. However, 

combining filled and unfilled resins does not result in a lower floor for filled resins. Therefore even if 

filled resins do need more HAP compared to the unfilled, this point is moot. 

In contrast, there are compelling reasons to now combine filled and unfilled. One is that it simplifies 

the rule, the second is that most of the best controlled facilities use add-on controls. The use of 

fillers does not impact add-on control performance. If we create an artificial separation here, we are 

essentially reducing the total population of facilities and biasing the floor. 

Combining filled and unfilled resins is also consistent with our approach for tooling resins (which 

may be filled or unfilled), and manual and filament winding resin application, where we do not 

differentiate between filled and unfilled. Based on out approach for these other application 

methods, the presence of filler, in and of itself, is not a reason to separate noncorrosion resin into 

different process product groupings. 

MechNonCR Combined comparison 

Keith W. Barnett 

US/EPA OAQPS, ESD/MICG C504-05 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

919-541-5605 

barnett.keith@epa.gov 

m 2 7 ?.7l3 

EPA AIR DOCKET i 

V 
Noncorrosion - Resistant, Filled and Non-Filled Mechanical Resin Application DRAFT 

2/22/02 

Both 

Both 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Both 

Both 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Both 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Both 

Both 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Rank 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

Noncorrosion - Resistant Filled Mechanical Application 

Important Notes: 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facility's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. | 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

A. R. E., Inc. (Massillon) 

A. R. E., Inc. (Mount Eaton) 

American Standard 

AKER Plastics Co., Inc. (Martinsburg) 

Bristol Fiberlite Industries 

Tomkins - LASCO Bathware (Elizabethtown) 

Tomkins - LASCO Bathware (Lancaster) 

Contemporary Products, Inc. 

Aqua Glass Corp. (Klamath Falls) 

Monaco Coach (Elkhart) 

CDR Systems Corp. (Corcoran) 

CDR Systems Corp. (Waynoka) 

CDR Systems Corp. (Palatka) 

Tomkins - LASCO Bathware (Yelm) 

Custom Fiberglass Molding, Inc. 

Livingston, Inc. 

Millennium Products, Inc. 

Tomkins - LASCO Bathware (South Boston) 

Krueger International, Inc. 

Zane's Fiberglass Shop, Inc. 

GHM, Inc. 

Bowie Manufacturing, Inc. 

Vertex Plastics, Inc. 

Eagle Craft, Inc. 

Grayson Tool Co. 

Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc. 

ACME Reinforced Plastics, Inc. 

Americh Corp. (Hollywood, CA) 

Astoria Industries, Inc. 

Epoch Industries 

FG Products, Inc. 

-iber Pro (formerly Great Dane Trailers Indiana, I 

Fiberglass Products, Inc. 

Gibbon Fiberglass Reprod., Inc. 

Glasspec Associates, Ltd. 

Glasstite, Inc. 

Resin 

Usage 

(tpy) 

2840.8 

262.6 

1000.0 

2275.7 

247.7 

2532.7 

2910.0 

191.9 

992.5 

523.2 

184.1 

184.1 

184.1 

2928.6 

122.5 

522.2 

850.7 

3171.5 

252.0 

75.9 

158.2 

51.2 

68.0 

61.2 

160.1 

55.1 

134.3 

42.1 

61.2 

44.0 

142.4 

378.8 

121.2 

22.1 

18.3 

336.6 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin Dius" 

38.0 

38.5 

42.6 

36.0 

38.0 

38.7 

38.7 

. 30.0 

30.0 

33.0 

33.0 

35.0 

36.0 

36.0 

37.1 

38.0 

35.8 

37.7 

41.0 

41.0 

40.0 

31.0 

33.0 

33.5 

34.0 

34.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

Filler5 

(tov) 

1894.4 

109.8 

1070.4 

2436.0 

0.0 

3304.6 

3564.7 

0.0 

1062.4 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

4215.6 

0.0 

0.0 

98.3 

4078.6 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

45.1 

42.8 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

69.7 

0.0 

0.0 

249.9 

.Reinforce. 

(tpy) 

1002.5 

54.9 

535.2 

1217.9 

40.5 

655.0 

356.0 

72.4 

531.1 

69.5 

69.5 

69.5 

575.0 

46.2' 

102.0 

335.5 

709.0 

95.1 

28.6 

54.0 

20.4 

28.0 

23.1 

60.4 

23.5 

65.7 

22.5 

40.8 

13.7 

53.7 

292.9 

. 51.5 

10.4 

5.5 

101.0 

Scrap 

(tov) 

783.3 

44.9 

437.6 

995.8 

48.6 

1027.8 

1047.0 

44.2 

434.3 

42.4 

42.4 

42.4 

1276.8 

28.2 

105.1 

215.0 

1277.8 

58.1 

17.5 

35.5 

12.0 

16.0 

14.1 

36.9 

13.1 

33.3 

18.4 

24.2 

9.7 

32.8 

111.3 

40.7 

5.4 

4.0 

115.9 

I 

Existina Source 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

ftrov) 

13.0 

1.2 

6.2 

17.5 

5.3 

59.2 

87.5 

6.2 

31.9 

18.6 

6.5 

7.3 

7.4. 

120.5 

5.1 

22.5 

39.3 

148.4 

12.1 

3.6 

7.8 

2.7 

3.8 

3.6 

10.1 

3.5 

9.4 

2.9 

4.3 

3.1 

10.0 

26.5 

8.5 

1.6 

1.3 

23.6 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(after MACT) 

(tov) 

13.0 

1.2 

6.2 

17.5 

5.3 

59.2 

87.5 

6.2 

31.9 

18.6 

6.5 

7.3 

7.3 

116.1 

4.9 

20.7 

33.7 

125.8 

10.0 

3.0 

6.3 

2.0 

2.7 

2.4 

6.3 

2.2 

5.3 

1.7 

2.4 

1.7 

5.6 

15;0 

4.8 

0.9 

0.7 

13.3 

189.4 

18.9 

MACT Model 

UEF 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton)" 

9.2 

9.5 

12.4 

15.4 

43.2 

46.7 

60.1 

64.2 

64.2 

71.0 

71.0 

79.3 

80.0 

82.3 

83.0 

86.0 

92.4 

93.6 

96.0 

96.0 

98.9 

104.8 

111.0 

118.5 

126.0 

126.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

Other 

Reduction 

Techniaues 

95% control 

95% control 

95% control 

90% control 

Thermal Oxidizer (76.4%), VSR 

51.51% control (added 2/19/02) Some VSR 

37.83% control (added 2/19/02) 

Vac. Bag. with rollout, VSR & Flow Coaters 

non-atomized 

Facility added 2/19/02 Non-atomized 

Flow Coaters 

Flow Coaters, Vacuum Bagging (4.35%) 

Flow Coaters 

14.79% control (added 2/19/02) 

Flow Coaters 

Flow Chopper 

Flow Coaters (88.79%) 

20.08% control (added 2/19/02) 

Flow Choppers 

Pressure-Fed Roller 

VSR, Flow Coaters (95%) 

None 

None 

None 

Vacuum Bagging 

T l 

CO 
Noncorrosion - Resistant, Filled and Non-Filled Mechanical Resin Application DRAFT 

2/22/02 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled • 

Riled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Both 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Both 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Both 

Both 

Both 

Unfilled 

Riled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Rank 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

67 

68 

69 

70 

71 

72 

73 

74 

Important Notes: | | lll l I I 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facility's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. | 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has Information. Other facilities that should be part ofthis database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Hess County Industries of WV, Inc. 

Johnson Truck Bodies 

Leer East, Inc. 

Marley Cooling Tower Co. 

MFG - Molded Fiber Glass Co. (Adelanto) 

New York Blower Co. (Plant #2) 

Newport Laminates 

Odom Fiberglass, Inc. 

S.W.C. Industries, Inc. (Swirl-Way Div.) 

Style Crest Products 

Universal Plastics, Inc. 

VMC Fiberglass Products, Inc./Tri-Glas 

Hydro Systems, Inc. 

Kreider Manufacturing, Inc. 

Molded Plastic Industries, Inc. 

Prestigious Accessories, Inc. 

Tomkins - LASCO Bathware (Anaheim) 

Comtech Antenna Systems, Inc. 

Dow Chemical (Russellville, AR) 

Eckler Industries 

Fibre Body Industries, Inc. 

Retterbush Injection Molded Fiberglass Corp. 

Appalachian Plastics, Inc. 

William Kreysler & Associates, Inc. 

Accra Industries, Inc. 

American Reinforced Plastics 

Cedar Manufacturing, Inc.fBremen Glas) 

Continental Camper Co., Inc. 

Tomkins - LASCO Bathware (Three Rivers) 

Tomkins - LASCO Bathware (Cordele) 

Reetwood (Fontana - fomieriy Gold Shield) 

Murphy Body Co. 

20th Century Rberglass, Inc. (Plant #4) 

A-1 Fiberglass, Inc. 

Alliance Equipment Co., Inc. 

Clark Manufacturing 

Covermaster, Inc. 

Rberglass Forms, Inc. 

Resin 

Usage 

(tov) 

494.0 

198.9 

544.7 

634.0 

209.0 

72.0 

183.6 

82.6 

992.5 

84.0 

84.6 

159.1 

125.0 

214.2 

102.0 

440.6 

4010.0 

180.9 

20.0 

28.2 

255.0 

22.2 

20.0 

7.5 

77.0 

288.0 

367.0 

188.2 

2845.2 

2856.0 

916.4 

117.0 

97.2 

402.9 

184.1 

661.0 

133.6 

120.0 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin Dius' 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

42.6 

35.3 

36.0 

36.0 

36.0 

37.0 

37.0 

37.0 

37.0 

37.0 

38.7 

37.1 

37.5 

37.9 

38.0 

38.0 

38.7 

38.7 

39.5 

39.5 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

Fillere 

(tov) 

494.0 

0.0 

445.7 

0.0 

20.0 

0.0 

0.0 

88.4 

1062.4 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

62.5 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

4890.8 

0.0 

0.0. 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

10.4 

0.0 

12.0 

121.0 

359.4 

0.0 

4386.6 

3092.2 

417.3 

0.0 

58.3 

40.8 

0.0 

325.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Reinforce. 

(tov) 

255.4 

75.1 

178.5 

174.0 

53.0 

27.9 

49.0 

46.7 

531.1 

31.7 

31.9 

60.0 

48.5 

49.0 

38.5 

166.3 

675.0 

68.3 

7.5 

1.7 

45.9 

8.4 

9.1 

2.8 

30.0 

44.0 

94.8 

71.0 

584.0 

415.0 

405.9 

44.1 

40.2 

140.8 

69.5 

233.0 

62.5 

45.3 

Scrap 

(tov) 

208.8 

45.8 

196.9 

135.6 

47.4 

16.7 

. 39.0 

36.5 

434.3 

19.4 

19.5 

36.7 

39.6 

44.2 

23.5 

101.5 

1472.5 

41.7 

4.6 

5.1 

50.7 

5.1 

6.7 

1.7 

19.9 

76.6 

138.7 

43.4 

1317.8 

928.1 

292.5 

26.9 

32.9 

98.0 

42.4 

204.9 

32.7 

27.6 

I 

Existina Source 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

(tPY) 

34.6 

13.9 

38.1 

44.4 

14.6 

5.0 

12.9 

5.8 

69.5 

5.9 

5.9 

11.1 

8.9 

15.4 

7.9 

33.9 

308.8 

15.2 

1.7 

2.4 

21.4 

1.9 

1.7 

0.6 

6.8 

26.1 

33.6 

17.2 

272.3 

273.3 

93.4 

11.9 

10.3 

42.5 

19.4 

69.7 

14.1 

12.7 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(after MACT) 

(tov) 

19.6 

7.9 

21.6 

25.1 

8.3 

2.9 

7.3 

3.3 

39.4 

3.3 

3.4 

6.3 

5.0 

8.5 

4.0 

17.5 

159.0 

7.2 

0.8 

1.1 

10.1 

0.9 

0.8 

0.3 

3.1 

11.4 

14.6 

- 7.5 

112.8 

113.2 

36.3 

4.6 

3.9 

16.0 

7.3 

26.2 

5.3 

4.8 

189.4 

18.9 

MACT Model 

UEF 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton)" 

140.0. 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

140.0 

142.8 

144.2 

154.0 

154.0 

154.0 

168.0 

168.0 

168.0 

168.0 

168.0 

168.6 

169.5 

175.5 

181.5 

183.0 

183.0 

191.4 

191.4 

203.8 

204.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

Other 

Reduction 

Techniaues 

VSR (50%) 

VSR 

None 

Carbon Filters - 42.5% control, VSR 

VSR 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

Flowcoaters (22%) 

None 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

Tl 

J> 
Noncorrosion - Resistant, Filled and Non-Filled Mechanical Resin Application DRAFT 

2/22/02 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled ' 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Rank 

75 

76 

77 

78 

79 

80 

81 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

88 

89 

90 

91 

92 

93 

94 

95 

96 

97 

98 

99 

100 

101 

102 

103 

104 

105 

106 

107 

108 

109 

110 

111 

112 

113 

114 

Important Notes: | | | I | I I I 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facility's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facilitys actual emissions and should therefore not be used. | 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Fiberglass Specialties, Inc. 

Florida Line of Astatula, Inc. 

Jason International, Inc. (N. Little Rock, AR) 

Lawrence Wittman & Co., Inc. 

Mr. Tubs, Inc. 

Phil Carter System, Inc. 

Piedmont Fiberglass, Inc. 

Plas-Tech, Ltd. 

Plastic Composites Corp. 

Seal Reinforced Fiberglass 

Sunrise Fiberglass Corp. 

Syntechnics 

Universal-Rundle Corp. (Union Point) 

Warminster Fiberglass Co. (Jacksonville) 

Warminster Fiberglass Co. (Southampton) 

C & K Fiberglass Plastics, Inc. 

Delta Fiberglass & Environmental Products, Inc. 

Fiberglass Plus Recreational Industries, Inc. 

Glas Master, Inc. (Plant #1) 

Glas Master, Inc. (Plant #2) 

GPM Industries, Inc. 

Hood Manufacturing, Inc. 

Michiana Fiberglass, Inc. 

Olympic Fiberglass Industries, Inc. 

Plasti-Fab. Inc. 

G.W. Fiberglass, Inc. 

S. R. Smith, Inc. 

Charloma Fiberglass, Inc. 

Rberglass Industries, Inc. 

Lund Industries, Inc. 

Bathcraft, Inc. 

Northwest Bodies, Inc. 

Aqua Bath Co., Inc. 

Electric-Glass, Inc. 

Elmore Truck Accessories, Inc. 

Fiberglass & Plastic Fab., Inc. 

Global Glass, Inc. 

Holiday Rambler Corp., Plant 36 and 37* 

Standard Glas, Inc. 

Fleetwood (Decatur - formerly Gold Shield) 

Resin 

Usage 

(tov) 

77.0 

133.2 

86.5 

26.1 

137.0 

46.0 

120.0 

40.0 

72.0 

8.5 

36.2 

1014.0 

1410.0 

108.9 

125.4 

104.0 

184.1 

37.2 

187.8 

187.8 

184.1 

177.0 

187.8 

184.1 

92.0 

752.8 

107.0 

347.4 

36.7 

503.3 

945.2 

150.2 

1117.0 

348.8 

35.0 

54.7 

281.5 

714.0 

126.3 

1669.3 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus" 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.1 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.0 

40.2 

40.2 

40.2 

40.2 

40.2 

40.2 

40.2 

40.2 

40.2 

40.3 

40.6 

40.8 

41.0 

41.0 

41.0 

41.2 

41.5 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

42.0 

Filler' 

(tov) 

0.0 

0.0 

64.0 

0.0 

110.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

36.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

1347.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

171.8 

114.5 

80.8 

0.0 

0.0 

986.9 

0.0 

1365.0 

49.1 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

59.2 

0.0 

313.1 

Reinforce. 

(tov) 

33.0 

74.4 

31.5 

9.8 

91.0 

17.4 

45.3 

15.1 

27.9 

3.2 

13.7 

687.5 

476.0 

9.0 

41.4 

16.3 

69.5 

14.0 

70.9 

70.9 

69.5 

63.8 

70.9 

69.5 

34.7 

658.1 

57.2 

121.2 

13.9 

189.9 

278.5 

53.6 

641.5 

102.8 

0.8 

22.0 

106.2 

199.8 

47.6 

678.6 

Scrap 

(tov) 

18.4 

34.5 

30.6 

6.0 

56.6 

10.6 

27.6 

9.2 

22.8 

2.0 

8.3 

282.4 

544.9 

20.0 

27.9 

20.3 

42.4 

8.6 

43.3 

43.3 

42.4 

40.3 

43.3 

42.4 

• 21.2 

262.5 

46.8 

92.2 

8.5 

115.9 

373.0 

34.1 

524.6 

84.1 

6.1 

12.8 

64.9 

163.4 

29.1 

447.9 

I 

Existina Source 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

(tov) 

8.1 

14.1 

9.1 

2.8 

14.5 

4.9 

12.7 

4.2 

7.6 

0.9 

3.8 

107.0 

148.8 

11.5 

13.2 

11.1 

19.7 

4.0 

20.1 

20.1 

19.7 

18.9 

20.1 

19.7 

9.9 

82.6 

11.9 

39.1 

4.1 

56.6 

107.8 

17.5 

134.0 

41.9 

4.2 

6.6 

33.8 * 

85.7 

15.2 

200.4 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(after MACT) 

(tov) 

3.1 

5.3 

3.4 

1.0 

5.4 

1.8 

4.8 

1.6 

2.9 

0.3 

1.4 

40.2 

55.9 

4.3 

5.0 

4.1 

7.3 

1.5 

7.4 

7.4 

7.3 

7.0 

7.4 

7.3 

3.6 

29.8 

4.2 

13.8 

1.5 

20.0 

37.5 

6.0 

44.3 

13.8 

1.4 ** 

2.2 

11.2 

28.3 

5.0 

66.2 

189.4 

18.9 

MACT Model 

UEF 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton)" 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

211.0 

213.8 

213.8 

213.8 

213.8 

213.8 

213.8 

213.8 

213.8 

213.8 

215.2 

219.4 

222.2 

225.0 

225.0 

225.0 

228.0 

232.5 

240.0 

240.0 

240.0 

240.0 

240.0 

240.0 

240.0 

240.2 

Other 

Reduction 

Techniaues

 a 

* VSR 

VSR (85%) 

VSR 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (50%, Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

None 

*u 
Noncorrosion - Resistant, Filled and Non-Filled Mechanical Resin Application DRAFT 

2/22/02 

Both 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Riled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Rank 

115 

116 

117 

118 

119 

120 

121 

122 

123 

124 

125 

126 

127 

128 

129 

130 

131 

132 

133 

134 

135 

136 

137 

138 

139 

140 

141 

142 

143 

144 

145 

146 

147 

148 

149 

150 

151 

152 

153 

154 

155 

156 

157 

Important Notes: | | lll l I I 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facilitys specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. | 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other facilities that should be part ofthis database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Associated Plastics, Inc. 

ED Industries, Inc. (Sportsman Pickup Covers) 

Eljer Plumbingware (Wilson) 

Glasgo Plastics, Inc. 

Images Products Corp. 

Jason Industries, Inc. (Elkhart, IN) 

Leer Midwest 

McClarin Plastics, Inc. 

Miracle Recreation Co. 

Acme Fiberglass, Inc. 

AKER Plastics Co., Inc. (Plymouth, N Oak Rd) 

AKER Plastics Co., Inc. (Plymouth, Pidco Dr) 

Americh Corp. (Charlotte, NC) 

Aqua Glass Corp. (Adamsville) 

Armorcast Products Co. 

Arrowhead Plastic Engineering, Inc. 

Chance Operations, Inc. 

Fiberdome, Inc. (Plant #1) 

Sunset Plastics, Inc. 

Miles Fiberglass & Plastics, Inc. 

Bremen Glas, Inc. 

Gorman-Rupp Co. 

Marquis Corp. 

Monarch Plastic, Inc. 

Specialty Plastics Associates, Inc 

Tom Smith Fiberglass, Inc. 

Custom Fibreglass Manufacturing Co. 

Arrow Dynamics, Inc. 

Beaver Motor Coaches, Inc. 

Brunnel Products of Florida, Inc. 

Evelands, Inc. 

Rberglass Engineering Corp. . 

McClure Industries, Inc. 

Melcher Manufacturing Co., Inc. 

Peterson Products 

Pillings F.R.P. 

Simon-Telelect, Inc. 

Trail Wagons, Inc. 

Country Coach, Inc. 

KBK Industries, Inc. 

Picken's Plastics, Inc. 

U.S. Fiberglass Products, Inc. 

Universal-Rundle Corp. (Ottumwa) 

• Resin 

Usage 

(tcv) 

162.6 

1012.4 

992.5 

1032.2 

109.0 

1012.4 

612.0 

992.5 

992.5 

185.0 

2310.1 

164.7 

63.2 

10143.0 

128.5 

70.0 

29.2 

100.0 

254.0 

159.7 

1159.0 

35.1 

105.0 

44.6 

841.0 

34.2 

463.1 

34.0 

185.1 

62.5 

60.5 

75.0 

142.8 

136.7 

22.5 

39.8 

32.8 

32.6 

101.0 

587.8 

28.5 

378.8 

2500.0 

Weighted. 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus" 

42.6 

42.6 

42.6 

42.6 

42.6 

42.6 

42.6 

42.6 

42.6 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.0 

43.5 

44.0 

44.0 

44.0 

44.0 

44.0 

44.0 

44.9 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.0 

45.9 

46.0 

46.0 

46.0 

46.5 

Fillere 

(tpv) 

174.1 

1083.6 

1062.4 

1104.9 

116.7 

1083.6 

510.0 

1062.4 

1062.4 

75.0 

2378.7 

180.5 

67.6 

4000.0 

62.5 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

215.0 

0.0 

1558.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

271.3 

0.0 

0.0 

56.0 

0.0 

0.0 

103.0. 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

108.1 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

3276.0 

Reinforce. 

(tpv) 

87.0 

541.8 

531.1 

552.4 

33.0 

541.8 

102.0 

531.1 

531.1 

90.0 

702.2 

52.3 

33.8 

3655.6 

32.5 

26.4 

11.0 

60.0 

70.0 

60.3 

393.0 

13.2 

39.6 

16.8 

350.4 

12.9 

149.9 

12.8 

69.9 

16.0 

23.3 

15.0 

63.5 

40.8 

13.5 

0.9 

11.0 

74.5 

54.0 

238.4 

10.8 

151.5 

804.0 

Scrap 

(tov) 

71.2 

443.0 

434.3 

451.7 

43.6 

443.0 

207.1 

434.3 

434.3 

58.6 

909.5 

67.0 

27.6 

2989.2 

37.7 

16.1 

6.7 

26.6 

90.9 

36.8 

524.8 

8.1 

24.2 

10.3 

199.0 

7.9 

148.8 

7.8 

42.6 

22.7 

14.0 

15.2 

52.0 

29.8 

6.0 

6.9 

7.3 

17.5 

44.2 

138.1 

6.6 

88.6 

1110.6 

I 

Existina Source 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

(tpy) 

20.2 

125.7 

123.3 

128.2 

13.5 

125.7 

76.0 

123.3 

123.3 

23.5 

293.4 

20.9 

8.0 

1288.2 

16.3 

8.9 

3.7 

12.7 

32.3 

20.7 

155.3 

4.7 

14.1 

6.0 

112.7 

4.6 

65.2 

4.8 

26.2 

8.8 

8.6 

10.6 

20.2 

19.3 

3.2 

5.6 

4.6 

4.6 

14.9 

87.3 

4.2 

56.2 

380.0 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(alter MACT) 

(tpy) 

6.4 

40.1 

39.4 

40.9 

4.3 

40.1 

24.3 

39.4 

39.4 

7.3 

91.6 

6.5 

2.5 

402.2 

5.1 

2.8 

1.2 

4.0 

10.1 

6.3 

46.0 

1.4 

4.2 

1.8 

33.3 

1.4 

18.4 

1.3 

7.3 

2.5 

2.4 

3.0 

5.7 

5.4 

0.9 

1.6 

1.3 

1.3 

4.0 

23.3 

1.1 

15.0 

99.1 

189.4 

18.9 

MACT Model 

UEF 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton)" 

248.4 

248.4 

248.4 

248.4 

248.4 

248.4 

248.4 

248.4 

248.4 

254.0 

254.0 

254.0 

254.0 

254.0 

254.0 

. 254.0 

254.0 

254.0 

254.0 

259.6 

268.0 

268.0 

268.0 

268.0 

268.0 

268.0 

281.5 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

283.0 

295.6 

297.0 

297.0 

297.0 

304.0 

Other 

Reduction 

Techniaues 

CBI 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

Vacuum Bagging (45%) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

Some VSR 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

VSR 

VSR (50%) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

Tl 
Noncorrosion - Resistant, Filled and Non-Filled Mechanical Resin Application DRAFT 

2/22/02 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Unfilled 

Unfilled 

Filled 

Filled 

Rank 

158 

159 

160 

161 

162 

163 

164 

165 

166 

167 

168 

169 

170 

171 

172 

173 

174 

175 

176 

177 

178 

179 

180 

181 

182 

183 

184 

185 

186 

187 

Important Notes: | | lll l I I 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facility's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. | 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Kohler Co. (Brownwood, TX) 

Eljer Manufacturing (Valdosta) 

Baja Products (Tucson) 

Baja Products Ltd. (Salisbury) 

Attbar Plastics, Inc. 

Fiber Pad, Inc. 

National Fiber Glass Products, Inc. 

Nordic Fiberglass, Inc. (Devils Lake) 

Nordic Fiberglass, Inc. (Warren) 

Pearl Baths, Inc. 

Fiberglass Systems, Inc. 

Oasis Industries, Inc. 

Space Tables, Inc. 

Accurate Glass, Inc. 

Aero Transportation Products 

Amtech Corp. 

Great Lakes Plastics Corp. 

Kivett's, Inc. 

Larson Co. 

Plastic Development Co. 

Ultra/Glas of Lakeville 

Dasco Pro, Inc. 

Universal-Rundle Corp. (New Castle) 

Coachman/Prod esign 

MAAX 

Able Body (Shifferdecker) 

Able Body (Seventh Street) 

Aqua Glass (McEwan) 

Kohler (Spartanburg) 

Proform/Xerxes 

Projected Total (including assumed values): 

Average: 

Filler/Resin Ratio: 

Reinforcement to Resin + Filler Ratio: 

Leaend: 

Facilities that comprise MACT floor 

Existing Source MACT Floor 

Assumed values - No data provided 

Verified in Telecon 

Resin 

Usage 

(tov) 

550.0 

363.0 

55.4 

100.0 

510.0 

96.0 

640.0 

316.2 

246.3 

325.0 

723.3 

145.0 

12.2 

114.0 

241.7 

47.8 

306.0 

43.4 

10.6 

140.0 

154.0 

15.0 

3585.0 

750.0 

420.0 

42697.2 

540.5 

0.72 

0.35 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus* 

47.0 

47.0 

47.5 

47.5 

48.0 

48.0 

48.0 

48.5 

48.5 

48.7 

49.0 

49.0 

49.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

50.0 

55.0 

60.2 

42.5 

45.2 

Fillerc 

(tov) 

520.0 

467.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

570.0 

270.0 

198.5 

0.0 

774.2 

145.0 

1.2 

114.0 

0.0 

0.0 

200.0 

0.0 

11.3 

0.0 

0.0 

3.0 

3256.6 

28996.6 

367.0 

Reinforce. 

(tov) 

100.0 

62.0 

20.9 

37.7 

244.8 

17.2 

219.7 

158.4 

142.2 

122.6 

33.0 

39.4 

15.0 

58.9 

91.2 

16.7 

90.0 

16.4 

5.7 

52.8 

75.0 

4.7 

765.6 

15667.7 

198.3 

Scrap 

(tov) 

197.9 

151.0 

12.8 

23.0 

125.9 

19.1 

240.9 

125.0 

98.4 

74.9 

259.8 

55.6 

4.7 

48.2 

55.7 

10.8 

100.4 

10.0 

4.6 

32.3 

38.2 

3.8 

1285.6 

14697.1 

186.0 

I 

Existina Source 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

(tov) 

85.5 

56.4 

8.8 

15.9 

82.9 

15.6 

104.0 

52.6 

40.9 

54.3 

123.0 

24.7 

2.1 

20.2 

42.8 

8.5 

54.2 

7.7 

1.9 

24.8 

27.3 

3.2 

895.6 

9056.3 

77.3 

Tons Reduced 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(after MACT) 

(tov) 

21.8 

14.4 

2.2 

4.0 

20.2 

3.8 

25.4 

12.5 

9.8 

12.9 

28.7 

5.7 

0.5 

4.5 

9.6 

1.9 

12.1 

1.7 

0.4 

5.6 

6.1 

0.6 

142.1 

3309.7 

21.4 

5746.6 

189.4 

18.9 

MACT Model 

UEF 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton)" 

311.0 

311.0 

318.0 

318.0 

325.0 

325.0 

325.0 

332.5 

332.5 

334.0 

340.0 

340.0 

340.0 

354.0 

354.0 

354.0 

354.0 

354.0 -

354.0 

354.0 

354.0 

425.4 

499.7 

247.0 

102.0 

N/A 

N/A 

Other 

Reduction 

Techniaues 

VSR (75%) 

VSR (Filled Resin Systems) 

*u 
Noncorrosion - Resistant, Filled and Non-Filled Mechanical Resin Application DRAFT 

2/22/02 

Rank 

Important Notes: | | lll l 1 1 

The average emissions factors used in this spread sheet to calculate emissions should not be used to determine or estimate actual emissions at a specific facility. 

A facility's specific emissions shown in this spread sheet may not represent the facility's actual emissions and should therefore not be used. | 

This database only contains facilities for which the Administrator has information. Other facilities that should be part of this database are likely to exist. 

Plant Name 

Based on Permit Information 

Footnotes: 

Resin 

Usage 

(tpy) 

Weighted 

Average % HAP 

in neat resin plus' 

Fillerc 

(tpv) 

Reinforce. 

(tpy) 

Scrap 

(tpv) 

1 

Existina Source 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(before MACT) 

(tov) 

MACT Model 

Emissions 

(after MACT) 

(tov) 

189.4 

18.9 

MACT Model 

UEF 

(before MACT) 

(lbs/ton)" 

Other 

Reduction 

Techniaues 

a = The HAP percentages are in terms of weight percent and they are based on the HAP content ofthe neat resin.plus any HAP that is added to the resin at the facility (fillers not included). 

b = Point values are expressed in pounds of HAP per ton of neat resin plus. III I 1 1 1 

c = Filler quantities for facilities that indicated filler use but did not quantify the amount were determ ined by using the average filler/resin ratio from facilities with known filler quantities. 

d = No emission reduction credit was given for the use of vapor suppressants. III I 1 I I 

T l 

CO