### 14483 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 57 / Thursday, March 25, 2010 / Notices

• ADS–B IM Coordination with SC–214 for Data Link Requirements— Discussion—ISRA Review/ Approval.

• Revised Terms of Reference (TOR)— Discussion—Review/Approval.

• New Business.

• Other Business.

• Review Action Items/Work Programs.

• Adjourn Plenary.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**  section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 19,
2010. Francisco Estrada C., RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010–6667 Filed 3–24–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**
**Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface**  **Wireless Communications**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface Wireless Communications meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface Wireless Communications.

**DATES :**  The meeting will be held April 13–14, 2010 from 9 a.m.–5 p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833–9339; fax (202) 833–9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 223: Airport Surface Wireless Communications meeting. The agenda will include: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 Tuesday Morning—Plenary

• Opening Session (Welcome, Introductions, Administrative Remarks, Approve/Review Meeting #2 Summary, RTCA Paper No. 045–10/SC223–005)

• Special Committee Leadership

• Designated Federal Official (DFO): Mr. Brent Phillips

• Co-Chair: Mr. Aloke Roy, Honeywell International

• Co-Chair: Mr. Ward Hall, ITT Corporation

• Agenda Overview

• Report from EUROCAE WG 82 meeting

• AeroMACS Profile Working Group Status

• 2nd Plenary action item status

• Assignment of MOPS working group leader Tuesday Afternoon—Profiles WG Breakout Session

• Document Structure

• Technical work on AeroMACS Profile Wednesday, April 14, 2010 Wednesday Morning—Profiles WG Breakout Session

• Continue AeroMACS Profile definition Wednesday Afternoon—Reconvene Plenary

• Profiles WG Status Report and Plenary Guidance

• Establish Agenda, Date and Place for the next plenary meeting

• Review of Meeting summary report

• Adjourn—Expected by 3 p.m. on April 14

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**  section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 19,
2010. Francisco Estrada C., RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010–6668 Filed 3–24–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**[Summary Notice No. PE–2010–07]**
**Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of petition for exemption received.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

**DATES :**  Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before April 14, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA– 2010–0101 using any of the following methods:

• Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically.

• Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.

• Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at 202–493–2251.

• Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union, etc. ). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78).

Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to


### 14484 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 57 / Thursday, March 25, 2010 / Notices

http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Laverne Brunache (202) 267–3133 or Tyneka Thomas (202) 267–7626, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

Issued in Washington, DC., on March 19,
2010. Pamela Hamilton-Powell, Director, Office of Rulemaking. Petition for Exemption

Docket No.: FAA–2010–0101. Petitioner: Air Canada. Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 93.123(a).

Description of Relief Sought: Air Canada requests an exemption from the limit for DCA set forth in § 93.123(a), to permit the FAA to create commuter slots during certain limited hours for Air Canada’s use. The proposed commuter slots would replace expiring slots currently held by Air Canada and used to provide service from DCA to points in Canada. Specifically, Air Canada desires one daily slot during each of the 1100, 1200, 1800, 1900, 2000 and 2100 hours. The proposed exemption would permit Air Canada to continue operating its existing services.

[FR Doc. 2010–6552 Filed 3–24–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**
**National Highway Traffic Safety Administration** 
**[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0031; Notice 1]**
**Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1991**  **Porsche 911 Series Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation** 

**AGENCY :**  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 1991 Porsche 911 series passenger cars, are eligible for importation.

**SUMMARY :**  This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 1991 Porsche 911 series passenger cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are eligible for importation into the United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of the 1991 Porsche 911 series passenger cars), and they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.

**DATES :**  The closing date for comments on the petition is April 26, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above and be submitted by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.

• Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001.

• Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

• Fax: 202–493–2251. Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.

Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc. ). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78).

How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search the Docket for new material.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the Federal Register

.

J.K. Technologies, LLC (‘‘JK’’), of Baltimore, Maryland (Registered Importer 90–006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming 1991 Porsche 911 series passenger cars are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles which JK believes are substantially similar are 1991 Porsche 911 series passenger cars that were manufactured for sale in the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.

The petitioner states that it compared non-U.S. certified 1991 Porsche 911 series passenger cars to their U.S.- certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with