alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 71085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30418]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 635

[I.D. 110800C]


Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries; Technical Gear 
Workshop; Postponement

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Postponement of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces the postponement of the technical gear workshop 
previously scheduled to discuss potential gear modifications and 
configurations for the Atlantic pelagic longline fishery.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margo Schulze-Haugen or Tyson Kade at 
(301) 713-2347.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 21, 2000 (65 FR 69898), NMFS 
announced that it would conduct a workshop on December 12-13, 2000, at 
NMFS, Building 4 - Science Center, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910. The purpose of the workshop is to allow fishermen, 
gear experts, sea turtle experts, and fishery managers to discuss 
possible measures, including gear and fishing method modifications, to 
reduce the incidental take and mortality of sea turtles in the Atlantic 
pelagic longline fishery. After announcing the workshop, NMFS received 
comment from fishermen that the scheduled dates posed a conflict with 
the active fishing period associated with the full moon. As 
participation by fishing vessel captains is an important aspect of this 
meeting, NMFS has agreed to reschedule the workshop. NMFS will announce 
a future date for this workshop in the Federal Register.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-30418 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Exhibit 32.03

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Financial and Operating Officer of Millburn
Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust
(the "Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.


/s/ Gregg Buckbinder
--------------------
Gregg Buckbinder
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
November 12, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.1
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Kentucky  First
Bancorp,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  as filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on November 14, 2002 (the "Report"),  I, hereby certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002  that,  to my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company




                               By:/s/ Betty J. Long
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Betty J. Long
                                  Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 14, 2002


<PAGE>


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Kentucky  First
Bancorp,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  as filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on November 14, 2002 (the "Report"),  I, hereby certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002  that,  to my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company






                               By:/s/ Robbie Cox
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Robbie Cox
                                  Title:  Chief Financial Officer/Vice President

Date: November 14, 2002
#### In the Matter of Ellen Shanahan, Respondent, v Classification Review Board of the Unified Court System of New York et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth L. Shorter, J.), entered October 19, 1989, which granted the petition, vacated the administrative order and remanded the matter to respondent Classification Review Board for further consideration, is unanimously modified, on the law, the matter remanded to respondent Chief Administrative Judge, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner held the title of Deputy Clerk as an Albany County employee in the Albany City Police Court. Pursuant to the reclassification program for nonjudicial employees in the Unified Court System petitioner was reclassified as a State employee to the title of Senior Office Typist (JG-8). Petitioner appealed her classification pursuant to 22 NYCRR 25.45 (c) (now 25.41 [c]), contending that her duties, which include interviewing complainants, drawing informations and issuing warrants, were more complex than Senior Office Typist functions of answering routine procedural questions and preparing standard form letters. When the Chief Administrative Judge denied her appeal, petitioner further appealed to the Classification Review Board. By administrative order dated June 14, 1988, the Board upheld the classification determination.

Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding. The court held that petitioner’s duties were far more complex in nature than those denominated for a Senior Office Typist (JG-8) and thus the determinations were without a rational basis and remanded the matter to the Board for further consideration to the matter of the most appropriate classification.

The court properly compared the totality of the job descriptions and found the classification to be wholly arbitrary. However, the Board is only empowered to reverse or modify a particular classification of the Chief Administrative Judge if the determination is unjust or inequitable, and does not have the power to reclassify positions *(Matter of Bellacosa v Classi*
      *218
      *fication Review Bd.,*72 NY2d 383). The order should thus be modified to remand to the Chief Administrative Judge for further consideration. Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Carbro Constructors Corp. ) ASBCA No. 62264

)

Under Contract No. W912DS

- 18

- C

- 0021 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Greg Trif, Esq.

Trif Law LLC

Morristown, NJ

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Lorraine C. Lee, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney

U.S. Army Engineer District, New York

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: April 1 5 , 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62264

, Appeal of Carbro

Constructors Corp. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: April 15, 2021 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-360-CR

TIMOTHY PAUL CONNELLA	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Timothy Paul Connella attempts to appeal his conviction and sentence for felony driving while intoxicated.  On October 2, 2006, the trial court signed a certification of appellant’s right to appeal, which was also signed by appellant and his attorney.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The certification states that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”  The trial court provided us a copy of appellant’s written waiver, signed by appellant and his attorney, in which appellant stated, “I give up and waive any and all rights of appeal in this case.”  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on October 17, 2006.

	On October 20, 2006, we notified appellant that the certification indicating that he had waived the right to appeal had been filed in this court and that we would dismiss this appeal unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Appellant filed a response stating that his appeal is based on ineffective assistance of counsel and claiming that “the matters being raised in the appeal of this conviction were all raised by written pretrial motions and ruled upon prior to trial.”  However, in his written waiver, appellant not only waived his right to appeal but also gave up and waived all pretrial motions that may have been filed in connection with his case.  Appellant does not refute these waivers.

	A valid waiver of appeal will prevent a defendant from appealing without the trial court’s consent.  Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).  The trial court did not consent to appellant’s appeal in this case.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (providing that an appeal must be dismissed unless the trial court’s certification shows that the defendant has the right of appeal).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 21, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Otero, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not err in rejecting defendant’s request for instructions on intoxication and the defense of justification. The record, viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant *(see, People v Padgett,*60 NY2d 142), reveals nothing from which the jury could rationally conclude that defendant believed he was threatened with deadly physical force or that defendant sought to withdraw from the encounter or that his reactions were those of a reasonable man acting in self-defense *(see,*Penal Law § 35.15; *People v Reynoso,*73 NY2d 816, 818, *habeas corpus denied sub nom. Reynoso v Leonardo,*735 F Supp 134, *affd*916 F2d 709). Also, there was no evidence from which the jury could reasonably conclude that defendant’s mental or physical faculties were impaired by alcohol *(see, People v Rodriguez,*76 NY2d 918; *People v Perry,*61 NY2d 849, 850).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Wayne County Court, Strobridge, J.—manslaughter, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
NUMBER 13-08-00164-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ANGEL GODINEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Angel Godinez, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss

his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the
2

appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate

will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.
#### DICKSON v. STATE.

No. 21624.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 28, 1941.

L. G. Hurley, of Gladewater, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of an automobile; punishment, two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The proceedings appear regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
J-S41033-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

RICKY TEJADA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

CAPTAIN PAINTER, LT. GAFF, AND 

HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATOR 

DREIBELBIS,

Appellees No. 2148 MDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered November 26, 2014

in the Court of Common Pleas of Huntingdon County

Civil Division at No.: 2014-00958

BEFORE: ALLEN, J., LAZARUS, J., and PLATT, J.*

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PLATT, J.: FILED JUNE 17, 2015

Appellant, Ricky Tejada, appeals pro se from the order dismissing his 

complaint. He raises issues that are in the exclusive jurisdiction of the 

Commonwealth Court. Therefore, we transfer to that Court.

On July 28, 2014, Appellant initiated this civil rights action against 

Appellees, employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. He 

alleged a violation of his constitutional rights based on excessive and 

unnecessary force and inhumane conditions of confinement, specifically, 

placing him in an intermediate restraint system for twenty-four hours. 

Appellees responded by filing preliminary objections in the nature of a 

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S41033-15

- 2 -

demurrer. On November 26, 2014, the trial court sustained the objections 

and dismissed the complaint. Appellant timely appealed.

It is well-settled that this Court may “raise[] the question of subject 

matter jurisdiction sua sponte . . . .” Commonwealth v. Danysh, 833 

A.2d 151, 152 (Pa. Super. 2003) (citation omitted); see Pa.R.A.P. 751(a), 

752(a).

Civil rights claims against prison officials are properly heard in the 

Commonwealth Court. See Danysh, supra; 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 762(a)(1)(i).

Here, Appellant has appealed the dismissal of his civil rights action 

brought against three employees of the Pennsylvania Department of 

Corrections. (See Appellant’s Brief, at 5). Accordingly, the Commonwealth 

Court has jurisdiction and we transfer this matter to that Court. See 

Danysh, supra.

Appeal transferred to the Commonwealth Court.1

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 6/17/2015

____________________________________________

1 Appellant’s Motion to Reinstate Appeal filed March 25, 2015 is dismissed as 

moot. Appellees’ Application for Relief filed April 10, 2015 is dismissed as 

moot.
#### NEILL et al. v. WOOSTER.

No. 3956.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 20, 1940.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1940.

W. B. Stowe and T. D. Kimbrough, both of Midland, for appellants.

Coffee & Coffee, of Big Spring, for ap-pellee.

PRICE, Chief Justice.

This action was instituted in the District Court of Midland County by Anna Faye Neill, as plaintiff, joined by her husband, against W. J. Wooster, as defendant. Plaintiff sought an injunction against defendant restraining him from having sold under an execution issuing on a judgment in his favor against H. B. Dunagan certain lots in the City of Midland. Ground for the injunction was that the property belonged to plaintiff, and not to H. B. Duna-gan, and that same was not subject to the judgment against said Dunagan. Defendant answered by general denial, specially that the property was the property of H. B. Dunagan, being the community property of said Dunagan and wife; further, that he held a' judgment rendered in the District Court of Howard County against said Dunagan in the sum of $1,436.02; that said judgment was duly spread upon the records of the District Court of Howard County, and same had been abstracted in Midland County. Defendant Wooster, by way of cross action, pleads this same judgment, and it is alleged by reason of the abstracting thereof in Midland County to be a lien on the land in controversy. In this cross action H. B. Dunagan, H. B. Dunagan, Jr., and C. M. Dunagan were made defendants. Said new defendants and plaintiff all filed answer to this cross action.

The case was tried to a jury, special issues submitted, and on the findings judgment rendered that plaintiffs take nothing against defendant Wooster, and in favor of said named defendant on his cross action, adjudging as against plaintiffs and cross-defendants a foreclosure of the judgment lien against the property in the sum of $2,199.13 and costs of suit. From this judgment the plaintiffs and cross-defendants duly perfected this appeal.

*534Appellants have filed no brief herein, hence the case is before the Court without assignments of error. The extent of our power is to examine the record for fundamental error. This we have done, and in. our opinion such error does not appear therefrom.

It is ordered that the judgment be in all things affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Notice of members of the FY 2000 Performance Review Board. 

# SUMMARY:

Section 4314© (4) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to publish notification of the appointment of individuals who may serve as members of that Agency's Performance Review Boards (PRB). The following have been designated to serve on the FY 2000 Performance Review Board for the U.S. Small Business Administration: 

1. Bettie Baca, Counselor to the Administrator; 

2. Charles Payne, General Counsel; 

3. Monika Harrison, Deputy to the Associate Deputy Administrator for Entrepreneurial Development; 

4. Kris Marcy, Chief Operating Officer; 

5. Arnold Rosenthal, Assistant Administrator for Borrower and Lender Servicing; 

6. Francisco Marrero, District Director (New Jersey); 

7. Kerry Kirkland, Associate Deputy Administrator for Government Contracting and Business Development; 

8. James Westbrooks, Assistant Administrator for Equal Employment Opportunity & Compliance; 

9. Cory Whitehead, Deputy to the Associate Deputy Administrator for Management & Administration; 

10. Bernetta Hayes, Associate Administrator for Communications and Public Liaison; 

11. Gregory Walter, Deputy Chief Financial Officer; 

12. Darryl Hairston, Deputy to the Associate Deputy Administrator for Government Contracting and Business Development; 

13. Jane Merkin, Assistant Administrator for Congressional and Legislative Affairs; 

14. Gail McDonald, National Ombudsman; 

15. Robert Baskin, Associate Administrator for Field Operations; 

16. Linda Williams; Associate Administrator for Procurement Policy and Liaison; 

17. Aubrey Rogers, District Director (New York); and 

18. Herbert Mitchell, Deputy Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

Dated: November 17, 2000.

Aida Alvarez, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-30261 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-43607; File No. 265-22]

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Market Information. 

# SUMMARY:

The second meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Market Information (“Committee”) will be held on December 14, 2000, in the William O. Douglas Room, at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC., beginning at 1:00 p.m. The meeting will be open to the  public, and the public is invited to submit written comments to the Committee.

# ADDRESSES:

Written comments should be submitted in triplicate and should refer to File No. 265-22. Comments should be submitted to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549-0609.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anitra Cassas, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, at 202-942-0089; Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549-1001.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10a, and the regulations thereunder, the Designated Federal Official of the Committee, David S. Shillman, has ordered publication of this notice that the Committee will conduct a meeting on December 14, 2000, in the William O. Douglas Room at the Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC., beginning at 1:00 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public. This will be the second meeting of the Committee. The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss appropriate models for consolidating and disseminating market information, and other issues relating to the public availability of market information in the equities and options markets.

Dated: November 21, 2000.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30370  Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M