alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

Dear _____:

Re: 2005 Transition Plan for Senior and Key Management Employees

We are pleased to inform you that you have been selected to participate in the
Allied Waste Industries, Inc. 2005 Transition Plan for Senior and Key Management
Employees ("Transition Plan").

Participation in this Plan is in addition to any potential awards you may
receive from other compensation plans and programs.

The Transition Plan is a one-time award plan for the 2005 year only. It was
designed to reward senior and key management employees, like you, who will play
a significant role in the Company's transition to a new Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and to ensure retention of key employees
while implementing the Company's new operating plan.

Your award under the Transition Plan is $_______________. Payment will be made
in two installments as follows:

      1.    You will receive a cash payment of 50% of your award within five
business days after June 15, 2005 if, as of June 15, 2005 and as of the payout
date:

            a.    You are employed by Allied in your current (or a similar, or
      more senior) position;

            b.    Your performance has been satisfactory; and

            c.    You have complied with the terms of your confidentiality,
                  non-solicitation and/or non-competition agreement with Allied.

      If you do not meet all three requirements, you will forfeit the entire
      amount (i.e., 100%) of your award.

      2.    You will receive a cash payment of the remaining 50% of your award
on December 20, 2005 if, as of December 15, 2005 and as of the payout date:

            a.    You are employed by Allied in your current (or a similar, or
      more senior) position;

            b.    Your performance has been satisfactory; and

            c.    You have complied with the terms of your confidentiality,
                  non-solicitation and/or non-competition agreement with Allied.

      If you do not meet all three requirements, you will forfeit the remaining
      portion (i.e., 50%) of your award.

We are happy to provide you with this opportunity. Together we will make a
difference in Allied's continued success.

Sincerely,
2005 Executive Officer Annual Compensation Table



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
  
 Plumtree Software, Inc. 
 Executive Officer Annual Compensation for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2005 
  

						
	 Name and Principal Position

	  	Expected Annual Salary ($)

	  	Maximum Potential Bonus ($)

	 
	 John Kunze
 Chief Executive
Officer
	  	300,000	  	300,000	 
			
	 Paul Ciandrini
 President and Chief Operating
Officer
	  	350,000	  	800,000	 
			
	 Eric Borrmann
 Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
	  	230,000	  	230,000	 
			
	 Ira Pollack
 Vice President of Worldwide
Sales
	  	300,000	  	200,000	(1)
			
	 Eric Zocher
 Vice President of
Engineering
	  	240,000	  	240,000	 
			
	 Adriana Chiocchi
 Vice President,
General
 Counsel and Secretary
	  	190,000	  	114,000	 



	(1)	Ira Pollack’s maximum potential bonus is uncapped and subject to sales performance. For further detail, please refer to the Employment Agreement between Plumtree Software, Inc.
and Ira Pollack filed as an exhibit to Plumtree Software, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2004 (File No. 001-31344).
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-13444

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00036-LGW-JEG-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JEREMIAH NATHANIEL BENNETT, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

 (November 4, 2015)

Before WILSON, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

B. Reid Zeh III, appointed counsel for Jeremiah Bennett in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

Case: 14-13444 Date Filed: 11/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Bennett’s motion to discharge 

counsel and appoint new counsel is DENIED, and Bennett’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-13444 Date Filed: 11/04/2015 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC01-7-000]


Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation; Notice of Filing

November 22, 2000.

    Take notice that on November 21, 2000, Central Hudson Gas & 
Electric Corporation (Central Hudson) filed with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission a letter clarifying the nature of a proposed 
transaction transferring its Danskammer generating units to Dynegy 
Danskammer L.L.C., as described in a previous filing in the above 
referenced proceeding.
    Central Hudson states that copies of these materials were sent to 
all parties appearing on the service list in the above referenced 
docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before December 1, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30408 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1060 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1060

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that a NADBank 
    guarantee is not considered a Federal guarantee for purposes of 
              determining the tax-exempt status of bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2009

 Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that a NADBank 
    guarantee is not considered a Federal guarantee for purposes of 
              determining the tax-exempt status of bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GUARANTEES NOT CONSIDERED FEDERAL GUARANTEES FOR 
              PURPOSES OF DETERMINING TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 149(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to certain insurance programs) is amended by 
inserting ``the North American Development Bank,'' after 
``Corporation,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to any bond issued before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3048]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-176-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Reconciliation Report

February 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on January 31, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing this reconciliation report as required by Section 
28.1 (a)(3) of the General Terms and Conditions (GT&C) of its Second 
Revised Volume No. 1 FERC Gas Tariff.
    ANR states that the reconciliation report is regarding the recovery 
of transition costs ANR incurred pursuant to Order NO. 636. ANR reports 
that it has experienced a slight underrecovery of transition costs 
($22,520), which it does not propose to collect from its customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before February 11, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-3048 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 21836.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1942.

R. W. Webb, of Snyder, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

■ BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Mary Belle King was tried before the County Judge of Scurry County without the intervention of a jury on a charge of violation of the liquor laws and assessed a penalty of nine months in jail, from which this appeal comes.

The record is before us without bills of exception and without statement of facts. The procedure appears to be regular and we find no error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David Lieberman, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: November 22, 2004


/s/ David Lieberman
-------------------
David Lieberman
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.03

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Financial and Operating Officer and principal
financial officer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The
Millburn World Resource Trust (the "Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Trust.


/s/ Gregg Buckbinder
--------------------------
Gregg Buckbinder
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
May 15, 2006
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL MARTINEZ

- SANTIAGO,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 73358

Agency No. A205

- 150

- 313

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

S u bmitted August 9 , 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER

, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH , Circuit Judges

.

Saul Martinez

- Santiago , a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying voluntary departure. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Ali v. Holder

,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 73358

637 F.3d 1025, 1028

- 29 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny in part and dismiss in part the

petition for review.

To the extent Martinez

- Santiago contends the agency erred as a matter of

law in determining that he is statutorily ineligible for voluntary departure, this

contention fails because he was granted voluntary departure in 2011 after he was

found to be inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A )

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(c)

( voluntary depar ture is not permitted if the alien was previously permitted to

voluntarily depart after having been found inadmissible under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1182(a)(6)(A)) ; 8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(d) (alien has the burden of proof in

establishing eligibility for any requested benef it or privilege) ; see also Corro

Barragan v. Holder , 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 (9th Cir. 2013) (the court’ s jurisdiction

over challenges to the denial of voluntary departure is limited to constituti onal

claims or questions of law).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Martinez

- Santiago’s unexhausted

contention that he was not advised that the previous grant of vo luntary departure

would render him ineligible for voluntary departure in the future

. See Tijani v.

Holder , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) of SBM Certificate Company (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William M. Baker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.    Date: August 31, 2012 /s/ P. Brady Hayden P. Brady Hayden Acting Chief Financial and Accounting Officer        1 120503 SBMCC Form 10-K 2007
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

# &&& % 

# &*^ X <"*&$&* OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF TEXAS PENALTY FOR 

### _J*RIVATE USE 

## RE: WR-82,242-01 a. u. 

### JEVANTE TREVION MITCHELL-SMITH U.S.POSTAGE»PITNEYBOWES 0001401603 JUL. 31. 2015
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                             FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, S. Leslie Flegel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink Companies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

June 9, 2004                            /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      S. Leslie Flegel
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 117 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 117

 To waive certain statutory time limitations with respect to the award 
of military decorations in the case of the award of the Medal of Honor 
                          to Marcelino Serna.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Coleman of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To waive certain statutory time limitations with respect to the award 
of military decorations in the case of the award of the Medal of Honor 
                          to Marcelino Serna.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the time 
limitations specified in section 3744(b) of title 10, United States 
Code, shall not apply with respect to the posthumous award of the Medal 
of Honor under section 3741 of such title to the late Marcelino Serna 
of El Paso, Texas, for acts of heroism performed while serving as a 
private in the United States Army during World War I.

                                 <all>
```
##### 



Year ended December 31,Earnings
    
    2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005Income before income taxes and
extraordinary items
    
    $
    6,722
    
    
    $
    14,483
    
    
    $
    15,796
    
    
    $
    20,949
    
    
    $
    30,126Interest expense
    
    
    21,224
    
    
    
    18,964
    
    
    
    15,115
    
    
    
    13,940
    
    
    
    13,940Amortization of debt issuance cost
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135Earnings
    
    $
    28,081
    
    
    $
    33,582
    
    
    $
    31,046
    
    
    $
    35,024
    
    
    $
    44,201Fixed charges:Interest, including capitalized portion
    
    $
    21,224
    
    
    $
    18,964
    
    
    $
    15,115
    
    
    $
    13,940
    
    
    $
    13,940Amortization of debt issuance cost
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    135Fixed charges
    
    $
    21,359
    
    
    $
    19,099
    
    
    $
    15,250
    
    
    $
    14,075
    
    
    $
    14,075Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.3X
    
    
    
    1.8X
    
    
    
    2.0X
    
    
    
    2.5X
    
    
    
    3.0X