alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 30, 2018By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

SOCIAL SERVICES and the MERIT

EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BOARD

,

Appellee s Below

, Appellant s

,

v.

TUESDAY S. BANNER

,

Appellant Below,

App ellee

. §

§ No. 56 0, 2015

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ C.A. No. N14A

- 03

- 001 DCS

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: November 2 , 2015

Decided: November 16 , 2015

Before HOLLAND

, VALIHURA

, and VAUGHN , Justices.

O R D E R

This 16 th day of November 2015, having considered the notice of appeal

from an interlocutory order, the supplemental notice of appeal from an

interlocutory order, and the motion to stay pending the outcome of the appeal , it

appears to the Court that:

(1) The app ellant

, the Department of Health and Social Services

(“DHSS”) , has petitioned this Court, under Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an

appeal from the Superior Court’s September 28, 2015 opinion reversing a decision

of the Merit Employee Relations Board (“MERB”) and remanding the matter to2

the MERB . DHSS has also filed a motion to stay pending the outcome of the

appeal

.

(2) On October 7 , 2015 , DHSS filed an application for certification to

take an interlocutory appeal and a stay of proceedin gs in the Superior Court. In an

order dated October 23, 2015, the Superior Court denied DHSS’ application for

certification and a stay of proceedings

. H aving considered the October 23, 2015

order, this Court agrees with the Superior Court’s denial of certification

. The Rule

42(b) principles and criteria do not weigh in favor of interlocutory review of the

Superior Court’s September 28, 2015 opinion

.

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound

discretion of the Court. In the exercise of its discretion, the Court has concluded

that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of

Rule 42(b) and should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory

appeal is REFUSED . Th e motion to stay is MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate
Fund V, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive
Officer of the corporate general partner of the General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|/s/   Leo F. Wells, III |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Leo F. Wells, III       |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|March 31, 2003          |  |
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

As adopted pursuant to****section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Allied Devices Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul M. Cervino, PrincipalOperating Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Paul M. Cervino    |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul M.  Cervino             |
|   | Principal  Operating Officer |
|   | January 13,  2003            |

 

----
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.1


Mutual Termination Agreement
This Mutual Termination Agreement (“Agreement”) is dated September 28, 2015, and is between Yahoo! Inc. and Yahoo! EMEA Limited (as successor-in-interest to Yahoo! Sarl) (together, “Yahoo!”), on the one hand, and Infospace LLC (f/k/a InfoSpace Sales LLC) and Blucora, Inc. (together, “Publisher”), on the other hand.  
Yahoo! and Publisher are parties to the Yahoo! Publisher Network Contract #1-23975446 effective as of January 1, 2011 (as amended, “Original Agreement”).
The current term of the Original Agreement ends on December 31, 2015, and the Original Agreement will automatically renew for an additional one year term unless a party provides the other party with notice of non-renewal at least 90 days before the expiration of the current term.
The parties are currently negotiating a new agreement, and to ensure the Original Agreement does not renew with its current terms, the parties are entering into this Agreement to terminate the Original Agreement at the end of its current term on December 31, 2015.
The parties therefore agree as follows: 
		
	1.
	Original Agreement Termination. The Original Agreement will not renew for an additional one year term and will terminate at the end of its current term on December 31, 2015. 


		
	2.
	Survival of Certain Obligations.  Neither party waives, and each party hereby reserves, the rights it has against the other party pursuant to the Original Agreement.


		
	3.
	Law and Venue. This Agreement will be governed by California law, without regard for its conflict of law principles. Each party hereby consents to personal jurisdiction and exclusive venue in the federal and state courts located in Santa Clara County, California.


The parties are signing this Agreement on the date stated in the introductory clause.
	
		
	YAHOO! INC.
By: /s/ Ian Weingarten                                      
Name: Ian Weingarten                                      
Title: SVP, Corporate Development & Partnerships
	INFOSPACE LLC
By: /s/ Peter Mansour                                       
Name: Peter Mansour                                       
Title:  President                                                 

	YAHOO! EMEA LIMITED


By: /s/ William R. Cobane                                
Name: William R. Cobane                                
Title: Director                                                   
	BLUCORA, INC. (as guarantor under Section 22 of Attachment B of the Original Agreement)
By: /s/ Eric Emans                                                
Name: Eric Emans                                                
Title: CFO
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Lynch, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, except that the independent public accountantsof the Company have informed the Company that they are currently unable tocomplete a review of the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of theCompany as required by Section 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X, see Note 1 to theConsolidated Condensed Financial Statements; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  James F. Lynch |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James F.  Lynch          |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |
| August 9,  2004          |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with  the Annual  Report  of Fi-Tek VII, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending  June  30, 2003 (the  "Report"),
I,  Ronald J. Miller, Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Ronald J. Miller
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
September 29, 2003



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with  the Annual  Report  of Fi-Tek VII, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending  June  30, 2003 (the  "Report"),
I,  Frank L. Kramer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Frank L. Kramer
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
September 29, 2003
pine Botto",

Aviation * Services LLC

PINE BOTTOM HELIPORT, 1702 Pulpit Road, Martinsburg, PA 16662

Direct Telephone: 814-793-4548 Alternate Telephone: 814-935-4548

February 2, 2013

U.S Department Of Transportation

Docket Management Facility

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

West Building, Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC2O!>-gO

Re: Pine Bottom Aviation Services LLC, Petition for extension of exemption from 14 CFR Part

120.117 (a) (2) Exemption #10305 FAA Docket # FAA-2011-0701

Pine Bottom aviation Services LLC operates as a single pilot VFR helicopter Part 135 air carrier

and aiso under part 91.147 commerciai air tours. Pine Bottom Aviation Services LlC seeks an

extension to my exemption from having to have two separate drug programs for one safety

sensitive member.

Having to setup another separate testing program for the same single individual would be

duplicating the process, thus causing economic impact to Pine Bottom Aviation Services LLC and

not providing any greater safety for the public.

This correspondence is a format request to seek an extension to my existing exemption from

having to obtain two separate programs for one individual and that Pine Bottom Aviation may continue

to operate with one single approved drug program.

Daniel.

www.pinebottomaviation.com

dan@pinebottomaviation.com
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1115

To extend with respect to certain disasters the maximum period for which

individuals are eligible for unemployment assistance under The Robert

T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act from 26

weeks to 52 weeks.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mrs. MINK (for herself, Mrs. MEEK, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. DIAZ-BALART,

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. DEUTSCH, and Mr.

UNDERWOOD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To extend with respect to certain disasters the maximum

period for which individuals are eligible for unemployment assistance under The Robert T. Stafford Disaster

Relief and Emergency Assistance Act from 26 weeks

to 52 weeks.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the maximum period for which assistance may be

4 provided to individuals unemployed as a result of a major

5 disaster occurring after July 31, 1992, and on or before

6 the date of the enactment of this Act under section 410(a)
2

•HR 1115 IH

1 of The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency

2 Assistance Act shall be 52 weeks instead of 26 weeks.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth M. Roessler, President and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Holding Company and BWAY
Corporation (the Companies) and Michael B. Clauer, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Companies for the quarter ended June 28, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 7, 2009

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Kenneth M. Roessler              
|Kenneth M. Roessler                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer

|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Michael B. Clauer       
|Michael B. Clauer           
|Executive Vice-President and
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

  Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. "1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. "1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of SBM Certificate Company, hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SBM Certificate
Company.


/s/ Eric M. Westbury
---------------------------------
Eric M. Westbury
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Trey Stafford
---------------------------------
Trey Stafford
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Date:  March 30, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BARRY JAMEL ALEXANDER, a/k/a Manny,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cr-00005-RBS-LRL-1)

Submitted: July 10, 2023 Decided: July 14, 2023

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Jamel Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7388 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/14/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry Jamel Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Alexander 

is ineligible for a sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. 

No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Alexander, 

No. 2:19-cr-00005-RBS-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2022). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7388 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/14/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Council will meet at 1 p.m., December 6, 2000, to select North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) proposals for recommendation to the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission. The meeting is open to the public. 

# DATES:

December 6, 1 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of the Interior, South Penthouse, 1849 C St., NW, Washington, DC 20240. The Council Coordinator is located at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 110, Arlington, Virginia, 22203. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David A. Smith, Council Coordinator, (703) 358-1784. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with NAWCA (Pub. L. 101-233, 103 Stat. 1968, December 13, 1989, as amended), the State-private-Federal Council meets to consider wetland acquisition, restoration, enhancement and management projects for recommendation to, and final funding approval by, the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission. Proposals require a minimum of 50 percent non-Federal matching funds. 

Dated: November 22, 2000.

Jamie Rappaport Clark,

Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

[FR Doc. 00-30455 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[J-3A-2020 and J-3B-2020] [MO:Todd, J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KONRAD KURACH,

Appellant

v.

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 EAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of Superior 

Court entered on August 24, 2018 at 

No. 1726 EDA 2017 (reargument 

denied October 10, 2018) reversing 

the Order entered on April 21, 2017 

and remanding to the Court of 

Common Pleas, Philadelphia 

County, Civil Division at No. 00339 

July Term, 2015.

ARGUED: March 10, 2020

MARK WINTERSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS 

SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Appellant

v.

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 13 EAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of Superior 

Court entered on August 24, 2018 at 

No. 1730 EDA 2017 (reargument 

denied October 10, 2018) reversing 

the Order entered on April 21, 2017 

and remanding to the Court of 

Common Pleas, Philadelphia 

County, Civil Division at No. 03543 

July Term, 2015.

ARGUED: March 10, 2020

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

JUSTICE MUNDY DECIDED: August 18, 2020

I agree with the majority opinion, except with respect to its implication that the 

policy is entirely clear and unambiguous. See Maj. Op. at 16-20. Instead, I believe the 

inclusion of the language “unless the law of your state requires [general contractor] fees 

and charges be paid with the actual cash value settlement” in Section 5(e) of the 
[J-3A-2020 and J-3B-2020] [MO: Todd, J.] - 2

insurance contract creates an ambiguity. Truck Insurance Policy (“Policy”) (Exhibit A to 

Wintersteen Amended Class Action Complaint, 10/2/15, at 35). More specifically, as wellexpressed by the trial court, 

[o]n its face . . . the provisional language regarding state law 

is ambiguous. Does exclusion of [general contractor’s 

overhead and profit] apply in Pennsylvania; what about New 

Jersey? The idea that a lay purchaser of a homeowner 

insurance policy likely needs legal assistance to understand 

what he or she is paying for is troublesome.

Trial Ct. Op., 4/21/17, at 12 (emphasis added); see also id. at 15 (concluding Section 

5(e)’s state-law language is “contingent and ambiguous on its face”). 

As I agree with the trial court’s rationale that Section 5(e) is ambiguous, the law 

requires the Policy to be construed in favor of Appellants as the insureds. See Prudential 

Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Sartno, 903 A.2d 1170, 1174 (Pa. 2006) 

(requiring ambiguous policy provisions to be construed in favor of the insured and against 

the insurer). To this end, my views align with Part II of Justice Wecht’s concurring and 

dissenting opinion. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. 

Justice Dougherty joins this concurring and dissenting opinion.