alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Gussie Kaufman, Deceased. Murray Kaufman, et al., Respondents; Jacob Kaufman, Intervenor-Appellant.

Order, Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee Holzman, S.), entered on September 5, 1989, which denied the motion by intervenor *pro se*Jacob Kaufman seeking vacatur of a decree of the same court (Bertram Gelfand, S.), entered on June 27, 1983, admitting the will of decedent Gussie Kaufman to probate, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Gussie Kaufman bequeathed her entire estate, in equal shares, to her four children as distributees. The will was admitted to probate on June 27, 1983. Intervenor Kaufman seeks to reopen that probate decree on the ground that the conservator of the decedent’s daughter, Esther Kaufman, provided inadequate representation by failing to submit an affida*295vit as to the absence of a conflict of interest between himself and his ward as required by SCPA 402 (1).

Upon examination of the record, we find that the Surrogate correctly concluded that the conservator’s failure to file the aforementioned affidavit pursuant to SCPA 402 (1), while a technical defect, did not rise to the level of a jurisdictional defect mandating vacatur of the probate decree. The conservator, Hyman Kaufman, who was neither a nominated fiduciary nor a beneficiary under the propounded instrument, clearly had no conflict of interest in the underlying probate proceeding. Moreover, the Special Referee appointed to review the conservator’s accounting on behalf of the decedent’s daughter, Esther Kaufman, made no objections to the distribution on her behalf from the estate of decedent Gussie Kaufman.

In any event, the intervenor himself admittedly neither objected to the probate of the will nor to the distribution obtained on behalf of Esther Kaufman by the conservator. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32-1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund
V, L.P., Series 3 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER,
JR.


Wilfred
N. Cooper, Jr.


President
and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





January
08, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-l 76-8(01 )

$

$

$

$

$

n

REPORT AND RECOMMBNDATION

CONCBRNING PLEA OF GUILTY

CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir.1997),

has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the three-count

Indictment filed May 3,2022. After cautioning and examining CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM under oath concerning each of

the subjects mentioned in Rule I l, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM be adjudged guilty of Conspiracy to

Distribute a Controlled Substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. S$ 846,8a1(a)(l) and (b)(f )(C), and have sentence imposed

accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge,

The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3la3(a)(l) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

tr The Government does not oppose release.

n The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

n I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or (c).

tr The Government opposes release.

n The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

n If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to I 8 U.S.C. $ 3 I a3(a)(2) unless ( I )(a) the Court finds there is a

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3 I a5(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convj evidence

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any

Date: October 5,2023

ENEE HARRIS

NI STATES MA STRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen ( l4) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved parry from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXl XB).

n

person or the co;nmur!

Case 3:22-cr-00176-B Document 88 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 388
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 31, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 31, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0543. WILLIS FRANKLIN ROBERSON v. SHAWN MARIE WATTS f/k/a 

SHAWN MARIE ROBERSON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2012D1557
#### JACKSON v. DAVIS.

No. 10861.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 29, 1941.

Roy Jackson, pro se.

T. M. Cox, of Beeville, for appellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

Neither appellant nor appellee has filed briefs herein, as required by Rule 29, Courts of Civil Appeals, 142 S.W. xii.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the cause for want of prosecution. The motion will be granted and the cause dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule 39 for Courts of Civil Appeals, 142 S.W. xiii.

Dismissed.
Exhibit















July 1, 2015


Jon Soldan
4751 W. Kootenai CT Riverton, Utah 84096






Dear Jon,


I am pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President, Operations at HealthEquity, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “the Company”) upon the following terms and conditions:


DATE OF COMMENCEMENT
Your start date will be August 3, 2015. This offer is contingent upon completion of a successful background and credit check, and the execution of an agreement between you and the Company containing non-solicitation, and non-disclosure provisions.


COMPENSATION PACKAGE
Your salary will be equivalent to $220,000.00 per year and will be paid twice monthly on the 15th
and last day of every month, equating to 24 pay periods per calendar year.


As the Executive Vice President, Operations, you will participate in the Company Executive
Bonus Plan, where 33% of your base pay will be tied to individual, team and company goals.
In determining the amount of bonus pay, the Company shall consider your work performance, and the Company meeting corporate-wide goals. Bonuses are not a guarantee and must be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.   Further details of this bonus policy are covered in the Executive Bonus Plan document attached hereto.


In addition to your regular salary and potential bonus, you will also be granted 100,000 non- qualified  stock options.  These stock options are subject to final approval by the Board of Directors of the Company. Further details of the non-qualified stock options are covered in the Stock Option Agreements.


Upon acceptance of this position as Executive Vice President, Operations you will be considered a Covered Person and required to comply with the provisions of the HQY Insider Trading Policy, a copy of which is attached to this letter.


“AT WILL” EMPLOYMENT 
Your employment with the Company is “at will”, which means that either you or the Company
may terminate the relationship at any time.  As such, neither this letter nor any other oral or written representations may be considered a contract for any specific period of time.







Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (801) 727-1274.


Kindly indicate your understanding and acceptance of this offer letter by signing below and returning a copy of the entire document to the People Department.


We look forward to having you continue your association with HealthEquity, Inc. and anticipate a long and successful future together.


Sincerely,


Natalie Atwood SVP, People HealthEquity, Inc.






ACCEPTANCE OF POSITION:


By signing this offer letter, I, Jon Soldan, accept the job offer of Executive Vice President, Operations, at HealthEquity, Inc.	
			
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Jon Soldan
	 
	July 6, 2015

	Signature
	 
	Date
In the Senate of the United States, 

April 22, 2010. 

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. Con. Res. 255) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolution commemorating the 40th anniversary of Earth Day and 

honoring the founder of Earth Day, the late Senator Gaylord 

Nelson of Wisconsin.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike the preamble and insert the following: 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson, former United States Senator from 

Wisconsin, is recognized as one of the leading environmentalists of the 20th Century who helped launch an 

international era of environmental awareness and activism; 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson grew up in Clear Lake, Wisconsin, 

and rose to national prominence while exemplifying the 

progressive values instilled in him; 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson served with distinction in the Wisconsin State Senate from 1949 to 1959, as Governor of the 

State of Wisconsin from 1959 to 1963, and in the United 

States Senate from 1963 to 1981; 
2 

† HCON 255 EAS 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson founded Earth Day, which was first 

celebrated on April 22, 1970, by 20 million people across 

the United States, making the celebration the largest environmental grassroots event in history at that time; 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson called on Americans to hold their 

elected officials accountable for protecting their health and 

the natural environment on that first Earth Day, an action which launched the Environmental Decade, an unparalleled period of legislative and grassroots activity that resulted in passage of 28 major pieces of environmental legislation from 1970 to 1980, including the Clean Air Act, 

the Clean Water Act, and the National Environmental 

Education Act; 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson was responsible for legislation that 

created the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore and the St. 

Croix Wild and Scenic Riverway and protected other important Wisconsin and national treasures; 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson sponsored legislation to ban 

phosphates in household detergents and he worked tirelessly 

to ensure clean water and clean air for all Americans; 

Whereas in addition to his environmental leadership, Gaylord 

Nelson fought for civil rights; 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson was a patriot, who as a young soldier 

honorably served 46 months in the Armed Forces during 

World War II, and then, as Senator, worked to ban the use 

of the toxic defoliant Agent Orange; 

Whereas, in 1995, Gaylord Nelson was awarded the highest 

honor accorded civilians in the United States, the Presidential Medal of Freedom; 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson’s legacy includes generations of Americans who have grown up with an environmental ethic and 
3 

† HCON 255 EAS 

an appreciation and understanding of their roles as stewards of the environment and the planet; and 

Whereas Gaylord Nelson was an extraordinary statesman, public servant, environmentalist, husband, father, and friend, 

and who never let disagreement on the issues become personal or partisan: 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 255 

AMENDMENT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RODERICK DESHUN WILLIAMS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-839

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed January 2, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Kimberly Campbell, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1247 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1247

To prohibit the furnishing of additional loans or credit guarantees by 
the United States to any foreign country which is in default or arrears 
in the payment of principal or interest on any loan made to the country 
by the United States or for which the United States has been obligated 
               to make payments under a credit guarantee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1993

 Mr. Kyl introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
the Committees on Agriculture, Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, and 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the furnishing of additional loans or credit guarantees by 
the United States to any foreign country which is in default or arrears 
in the payment of principal or interest on any loan made to the country 
by the United States or for which the United States has been obligated 
               to make payments under a credit guarantee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Protection Act''.

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON LOANS OR GUARANTEES TO COUNTRIES IN DEFAULT.

    (a) Prohibition.--A Federal agency may not make a loan to a foreign 
country under any law or guarantee under any law the repayment of 
credit made available to the country if--
            (1) the country is in default or in arrears in the payment 
        to the United States of principal or interest on any loan made 
        to the country by the United States; or
            (2) the United States has been obligated, at any time 
        during the preceding one-year period, to make reimbursing 
        payments to a commercial creditor under a credit guarantee 
        issued by the United States on behalf of the country and the 
        country has not repaid the United States the total amount of 
        the payments made by the United States under the guarantee.
    (b) Investigation.--The head of a Federal agency making a loan to, 
or issuing a credit guarantee on behalf of, a foreign country shall 
make diligent inquiry to ensure that the loan or guarantee is not made 
or issued in violation of subsection (a).
    (c) Federal Agency Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``Federal agency'' includes the Commodity Credit Corporation, the 
Export-Import Bank of the United States, and the Overseas Private 
Investment Corporation.

                                 <all>
```
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1104 

For the relief of Mikael Adrian Christopher Figueroa Alvarez. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2009 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Mikael Adrian Christopher Figueroa 

Alvarez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MIKAEL 

4 ADRIAN CHRISTOPHER FIGUEROA ALVAREZ. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Mikael Adrian Christopher Figueroa Alvarez shall be 

8 eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust9 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 

10 permanent residence upon filing an application for 

11 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1104 IH

1 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi2 dent. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Mikael Adrian 

4 Christopher Figueroa Alvarez enters the United States be5 fore the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 

6 be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 

7 shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of 

8 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

14 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

16 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res17 idence to Mikael Adrian Christopher Figueroa Alvarez, the 

18 Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to re19 duce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal year, 

20 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail21 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

22 section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 

23 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

24 made available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

25 under section 202(e) of such Act. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1104 IH

1 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Mikael Adrian Chris4 topher Figueroa Alvarez shall not, by virtue of such rela5 tionship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated September 6, 2000, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 25, 2000 (65 FR 57623), Roche Diagnostics Corporation, 9115 Hague Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of alphamethadol (9605), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I.                

The firm plans to import the alphamethadol to manufacture diagnostic products for distribution to its customers.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Roche Diagnostics Corporation to import alphamethadol is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Roche Diagnostics Corporation on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, audits of the company's records, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act and in accordance with title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, section 1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an exporter of the basic class of controlled substance listed above.

Dated: November 8, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-30296 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M