alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBBY DOYLE CALHOUN, #22977077, 

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Case 3:22-CV-1426-B-BK

 §

CARL HAYS, et al., §

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 19 day of August, 2022. th

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01426-B-BK Document 14 Filed 08/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48
13 CA ADC § 2254 Page 1

13 CCR s 2254
Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13 , s 2254

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF

REGULATIONS
TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES
DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD
CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR V EHICLE FUELS
ARTICLE 1. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE
SUBARTICLE 1. GASOLINE STANDARDS THAT
BECAME APPLICABLE BEFORE 1996 This database is current through 12/26/2003, Register

2003, No. 52.

s 2254. Manganese Additive Content.

(a) Except as provided in subparagraph (b), no person shall add manganese or any manganese compound, i ncluding the compound methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT), to gasoline represented as unleaded
inten ded to be sold, offered for sale, or delivered for sale at
retail in the State of California. (b) The prohibitions set forth in subparagraph (a) shall not apply to any person who has applied for and received from the Executive Officer written approval to add manganese or any manganese compound, including MMT, to gasoline represented as unleaded for the purpose of conducting tests or research into the effect thereof on vehicle emissions, fuel economy, performance, or for other related research objectives.

< General Materials (GM)

- References, Annotations, or

Tables >

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013,
43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and Western
Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County A ir Pollution Co ntrol District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal Rptr. 249 (1975).
Reference: Sections 39000

- 39003, 39500, 39515, 39516, 43000, 43013 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and Western Oil and Gas Ass'n v. Orange County APCD, 14 Cal3d. 411, 121 Cal. Rptr 249 (1975).

HISTORY

1. New section filed 8

- 1

- 77; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 77, No. 32).

2. Amendment filed 10

- 25

- 77 as an emergency; effective upon filing. Certificate of Compliance included (Register 77, No. 44 ).

3. Amendment of NOTE filed 3

- 3

- 83; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 83, No. 10).

4. Amendment of subsections (a) and (b) filed 7

- 12

- 91; operative 8

- 12

- 91 (Register 91, No. 43).

13 CA ADC s 2254
END OF DOCUMENT
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-WPG 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of July 24, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,649,034
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          79,667
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               445,048
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,660,202
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,054,145
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,044,688
<LOANS>                                    114,996,606
<ALLOWANCE>                                    743,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             152,002,443
<DEPOSITS>                                 116,607,730
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,322,101
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,250,356
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,322,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             152,002,443
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,298,951
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              456,538
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                50,133
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,805,622
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,387,126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,537,036
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,268,586
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               6,418
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                755,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,041,783
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     634,783
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   634,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.71
<LOANS-NON>                                    558,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               738,547
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              743,547
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           743,547
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### R. A. RICHEY, Plaintiff in Error, v. CENTRAL SECURITIES COMPANY, Defendant in Error.

No. 10706.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 14, 1940.

Clarence R. Boatwright and Dodson, Ezell & Duke, all of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

Charles M. Dickson and Henry F. Holland, both of San Antonio, for defendant in error.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case with E. L. Kirby v. South Texas National Bank of San Antonio, this day decided by this court. 137 S.W.2d 98.

The issues of law and of fact in the two cases are identical, and for the reasons given in the opinion in the companion case, the- judgment in this cause will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
#### BLACKWELL v. STATE.

No. 21903.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1942.

T. B. Sisco, of McKinney, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted upon a grand jury indictment charging the theft of an automobile, and assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary, from which he appeals.

The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. The procedure is regular and presents nothing for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Case 3:22-cv-02359-M-BN Document 35 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 175
Case 3:22-cv-02359-M-BN Document 35 Filed 01/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 176
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jorge A. Celaya, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  *Jorge  A. Celaya*                       |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jorge A.  Celaya                                   |
| Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| May 10, 2004                                       |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000943320
<NAME>                        TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998 
<CASH>                                             187,598
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       95,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                        23,548
<INVENTORY>                                         13,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   305,111
<PP&E>                                           2,329,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                     356,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,504,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              214,550
<BONDS>                                          1,735,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  242
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         303,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,504,475
<SALES>                                          1,057,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,186,522
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      670,482<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   262,210<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10,510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 166,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (23,338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (23,338)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (23,338)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.05)
                                               
<FN>
<F1> Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other.
<F2> Includes general & administration, depreciation & amortization and 
     development costs.
</FN>

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1363

To rescind a portion of the funds available for HOPE grants, and to transfer

an additional portion of the funds to the HOME investment partnerships

program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. ORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Appropriations

A BILL

To rescind a portion of the funds available for HOPE grants,

and to transfer an additional portion of the funds to

the HOME investment partnerships program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1363 IH

1 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN

2 DEVELOPMENT

3 HOUSING PROGRAMS

4 HOMEOWNERSHIP AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE

5 EVERYWHERE GRANTS (HOPE GRANTS)

6 (RESCISSION AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

7 Of the funds made available under this heading

8 (other than the $300,000,000 provided for grants to carry

9 out an urban revitalization demonstration program) in the

10 Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban

11 Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations

12 Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1579),

13 $275,000,000 is rescinded and $50,000,000 shall be

14 transferred to and merged with the appropriation in such

15 Act for ‘‘HOME investment partnerships program’’.

16 Of the funds made available under this heading in

17 the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and

18 Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appro19 priations Act, 1992 (Pub. L. 102–139; 105 Stat. 743),

20 $125,000,000 is rescinded and $25,000,000 shall be

21 transferred to and merged with the appropriation in such

22 Act for ‘‘HOME investment partnerships program’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Balance Sheet
at July 31,  1997  (Unaudited)  and the  Statement  of Income for the Six Months
Ended July 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-30-1997
<CASH>                                         70,718
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,336,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                   374,289
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,788,010
<PP&E>                                         2,030,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,313,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,079,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,106,820
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       71,659
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,194,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,079,046
<SALES>                                        5,468,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,468,016
<CGS>                                          2,884,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,062,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             415,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,078,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                   489,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            589,598
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   589,598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .07
        



</TABLE>
# George Washington’s 1781 Campaign Design Revealed

/ Published Feb. 13, 2019
FSC Faculty, Pat Hannum published "George Washington’s 1781 Campaign Design Revealed" in Journal of the American Revolution- Published Jan 2018.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CHRISTOPHER LYNN KOP P E , Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 3069 LT Case No. 2008

- CF

- 043786

- A STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed M arch 3, 2023 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , Tesha Scolaro Ballou , Judge. Christopher L ynn Koppe , Avon Park, pro se

. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Wa gner v. State , 177 So. 3d 695, 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ( r ecognizing that when a d efendant enters an open plea, there is no plea agreement between the d efendant and the S tate , and the trial court has the absolute discretion to determine the appropriate sentence); Jacoby v. State , 215 So. 3d 168, 171

– 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ( r ecognizing that if a2 defendant is sentenced to a new prison sentence upon the revocation of the probationary term of a probationary sp l it sentence, the defendant is not entitled to credit for the full amount of the original sentence if he obtained an early release due to gain time

— he is entitled to credit for the time he actually served in prison); Brown v. State , 268 So. 3d 177, 179 (Fl a. 4th DCA 2019) (“[F]orfeiture of gain time is a collateral consequence, and

. . . neither the circuit court nor counsel was required to forewarn the defendant about that collateral consequence

. ” ( citing Ortiz v. State , 227 So. 3d 682, 6 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)) ) ; State v. Rodriguez , 990 So. 2d 600, 606

– 07 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“ [T]here is no requirement that a defendant be given a specifically quantified amount of time that he is expected to serve in prison

. ”).

LAMBERT, C.J. , MAKAR and BOATWRIGHT , JJ., concur.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  SSO / Security Manager Office Welcome to the SSO/Security Managers page. This site provides contact information and the minimum security requirement for courses of instruction offered at the Joint Forces Staff College. The SSO/Security Managers Office is the focal point within JFSC for all matters pertaining to personnel security and the Sensitive Compartment Information Facility (SCIF). IMPORTANT!**Review clearance requirements for JFSC courses**
 College Security Office Points of Contact Hours of Operation:
 0800 - 1500 Monday - Friday
 CSO POC'sCommercial
   (757) 443-6352 / 6324Unclassified facsimile
   (757) 443-6035 / 6046Unclassified email
   sso@ndu.edu  Passing Instruction for Visit/Perm Certifications: All collateral visit certification can be passed via DISS SMO code: DJJNDU7 All SCI visit certification can be passed via DISS SMO code: DJJNDU7 or via JWICS MSG PLA SSO JFSCOL
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# USCENTCOM Commander visits JFSC 

/ Published Jan. 14, 2021
NORFOLK NAVAL BASE, VA, 
On December 15th 2020, U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie, Jr., Commander of the United States Central Command, visited the Joint Forces Staff College to address JFSC faculty and JAWS students. During the address, Gen. McKenzie provided insight on the USCENTCOM AOR and fielded questions from students and faculty, providing invaluable real-world experience from the Combatant Command level. These types of engagements are critical to the development of our future joint planners.
Exhibit 10.1







EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT


 


THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (“AMENDMENT”), is made and entered into by and between Sharps Compliance Corp., having its principle office at 9220 Kirby Drive, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77054 (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and David P. Tusa (hereinafter referred to as the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


For and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree to amend the Executive’s original executed employment agreement, dated July 14, 2003 and amended on, (i) October 1, 2004 (effective June 21, 2004), (ii) August 19, 2005, (iii) June 14, 2010, (iv) December 2, 2011 (effective November 17, 2011) and (v) March 6, 2012 (effective March 1, 2012), herein defined as the “Agreement”, as follows:


 


The Base Salary referred to in Article 1.3.1 (as amended) of $11,538.46 per pay period (twenty-six pay periods per year) is hereby changed to $13,461.54.


 


IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first written below with the amended provisions noted above being effective September 10, 2015.







	 	
EXECUTIVE:


	 	 
	 	
By:

	
/s/ David P. Tusa


	 	
Executive


	 	 
	 	
Date:

	
September 10, 2015


	 	 	 
	 	
COMPANY:


	 	 
	 	
By:

	
/s/ Diana P. Diaz


	 	
Name:

	
Diana P. Diaz


	 	 	 
	 	
Title:

	
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


	 	 	 
	 	
Date:

	
September 10, 2015
Case 2:22-cr-00107-Z-BR Document 35 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 83