alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 106

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision 
   which includes unemployment compensation in income subject to tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Applegate introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision 
   which includes unemployment compensation in income subject to tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TAXATION OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

    (a) General Rule.--Section 85 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to unemployment compensation) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Repeal of Reporting Requirements.--Section 6050B of such Code 
(relating to returns relating to unemployment compensation) is hereby 
repealed.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--
            (1) The table of sections for part II of subchapter B of 
        chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking the item relating 
        to section 85.
            (2) The table of sections for subpart B of part III of 
        subchapter A of chapter 61 of such Code is amended by striking 
        the item relating to section 6050B.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments after December 31, 1990.

                                 <all>
```
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0340 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 073 - AD Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S - 76C Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : These actio ns are intended to prevent unintended movement of the engine control levers, resulting in main rotor speed decay and subsequent loss of control of the aircraft. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 939 Labor per Helicopter ( 2 x $ 8 5 /wor

k- hour s ) $ 170 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 1,109 Total US Fleet Cost $ 57,668 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Isthe AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Kirk Gustafson
HEALTHCARE
ACQUISITION CORP.




 

April 28,
2005

 




Equity
Dynamics Inc.

2116
Financial Center

666
Walnut Street

Des
Moines, Iowa 50309







Gentlemen:




This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
“Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial public offering
("IPO") of the securities of Healthcare Acquisition Corp. ("HAC") and continuing
until the earlier of the consummation by HAC of a "Business Combination" or
HAC's liquidation (as described in HAC's IPO prospectus; such date the
"Termination Date"), Equity Dynamics Inc. shall make available to HAC certain
office and secretarial services as may be required by HAC from time to time,
situated at 2116 Financial Center, 666 Walnut Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309. In
exchange therefore, HAC shall pay Equity Dynamics Inc. the sum of $6,000 per
month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the
Termination Date.

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	HEALTHCARE ACQUISITION
      CORP.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
		By:  	/s/ Matthew P.
    Kinley
	 	
      

      Name: Matthew P. Kinley
	 	Title:
President



 

AGREED TO
AND ACCEPTED BY:





	 	 	 
	 	EQUITY DYNAMICS
      INC.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
		By:  	/s/ John
  Pappajohn
	 	
      

      Name: John Pappajohn
	 	Title:
President
Exhibit 10.1

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO

                         EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                                JOHN C. ANTENUCCI



     This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("First Amendment")
is entered into as of this 31st day of January, 2005, by and between
PlanGraphics Inc., a Colorado corporation, formerly known as Integrated Spatial
Information Solutions, Inc. ("Employer") and John C. Antenucci ("Executive").


     WHEREAS, Executive and Employer are parties to an Executive Employment
Agreement dated May 1, 2002 ("the Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, paragraph 2 of the Agreement provides that the term of the
Agreement shall expire on April 30, 2005 (the "Expiration Date"); and

     WHEREAS, Executive and Employer desire to amend the Agreement in order to
provide a nine-month extension of the term of the Agreement and to make no other
changes to the Agreement.

     NOW THEREFORE, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
hereinafter contained, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to change the Expiration
Date from April 30, 2005, to January 31, 2006.

     2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.


     EXECUTED at Frankfort, Kentucky, on the date aforesaid.


EXECUTIVE:                                 PLANGRAPHICS, INC., A COLORADO
                                           CORPORATION

/s/ John C. Antenucci                      By: /s/ Gary Murray
---------------------                      -------------------
John C. Antenucci                          Gary Murray, Chairman
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas H. Reslewic, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

| (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: November 9, 2006 |
|------------------------|

/s/ Thomas H. Reslewic

Thomas H. Reslewic

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Intelligence Agency, Joint Military Intelligence College, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (d) of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Joint Military Intelligence College Board of Visitors has been scheduled as follows:

      ( print page 75245)    

# DATES:

Tuesday, 9 January 2001, 0800 to 1700; and Wednesday, 10 January 2001, 0800 to 1200.

# ADDRESSES:

Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington , DC 20340-5100

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. A Denis Clift, President, DIA Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100 (202/231-3344).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The entire meeting is devoted to the discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(1), Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed. The Board will discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, as to the successful accomplishment of the mission assigned to the Joint Military Intelligence College.

Dated: November 27, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-30588 Filed 11-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                           Natural Energy Group, Inc.
                  Computation of Historical Ratio if Earnings
                                to Fixed Charges
                       (in thousands, except for ratios)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                 Years ended December 31,
                                                           -------------------------------------------------------
                                                             1999        2000        2001        2002       2003
                                                           -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
<S>                                                        <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings
 Income before income taxes and extraordinary items        $ 2,024     $18,609     $ 6,722     $14,483     $15,796
 Interest expense                                            1,909       9,656      21,224      18,964      15,115
 Amortization of debt issuance cost                            863         121          --          --          --
 Interest portion of rental expense                            129         135         135         135         135
                                                           -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
  Earnings                                                 $ 4,925     $28,521     $28,081     $33,582     $31,046
                                                           =======     =======     =======     =======     =======

Fixed charges:
 Interest, including capitalization portion                $ 1,909     $ 9,656     $21,224     $18,964     $15,115
 Amortization of debt issuance cost                            863         121          --          --          --
 Interest portion of rental expense                            129         135         135         135         135
                                                           -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
  Fixed charges                                            $ 2,901     $ 9,912     $21,359     $19,099     $15,250
                                                           -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           NA(a)       NA(a)        1.3X        1.8X        2.0X
                                                           =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
</Table>


(a) This ratio excludes approximately $17.7 million and $10.5 million for 1999
and 2000, respectively, of interest on the senior notes since the Company
discontinued the accrual of interest due to the Chapter 11 proceeding.
Agenda

July 28, 2017

https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fio/acrsm

10:00 – 10:20 Welcome

Steven Seitz

Deputy Director, Federal Insurance Office

U.S. Department of the Treasury

10:20 – 10:40 Background on the Use of Capital Markets

Paul Schultz, Aon Securities

10:40 – 11:00 Modeling Terrorism Risk for Insurance-Linked Securities

Maria Paul, RMS

11:00 – 11:20 Asset Management in the Capital Markets

Presentation by Michael Millette, Hudson Structured Capital Management

11:20 – 11:50 Policyholder Perspective on Purchasing Catastrophic Bonds

Presentation by Barry Gilway, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

11:50 – 12:30 Presenter Panel Discussion

12:30 – 12:45 Update on Activities of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program

Richard Ifft, Federal Insurance Office, U.S. Department of the Treasury

12:45 – 1:00 New Business

1:00 Adjourn

10:00 – 10:15 Welcome - Steven Seitz, Deputy Director, Financial Stability, Federal Insurance Office

10:15 – 10:45 Discussion of Terrorism Risk Insurance Issues Faced by Small Insurers in the Workers’

Compensation Market

Presentation by Julie Bowler, Atlantic Charter Insurance Company

10:45 – 11:15 Discussion of Terrorism Risk Insurance Issues Faced by Small Insurers

Presentation by Elizabeth Heck, GNY Insurance Company

11:15 – 11:45 Discussion of the Impact of Terrorism Risk Insurance on the Direct Insurance Market

Presentation by Stef Zielezienski, Senior Vice President and General Counsel,

 American Insurance Association

➢ 

11:45 – 12:15 Discussion of the Impact of Terrorism Risk Insurance for Commercial Real Estate Owners

 Presentation by Edward Walter, Real Estate Roundtable and Professor, 

McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University

12:15 – 12:30 Committee Discussion between ACRSM Members 

Terrorism risk insurance market metrics

 Key TRIA Features

Potential Market Reactions to TRIP Restructuring

12:30 – 12:45 Current Status of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program

Presentation by Richard Ifft, Senior Insurance Regulatory Policy Analyst, 

Federal Insurance Office, U.S. Department of the Treasury

12:45 – 1:00 New Business

Confirmation of Subcommittee Assignments

Charter

Website

1:00 Adjourn

Agenda

March 31, 2017

Federal Advisory Committee on 

Risk-Sharing Mechanisms
#### WATSON v. STATE.

No. 21249.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment being assessed at seven years in the penitentiary.

The record before this court contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

614 

KA 12-01040 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEREMY M. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DANIEL GROSS OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Joseph G.

Nesser, A.J.), rendered March 13, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of rape in the second degree (Penal Law §

130.30 [1]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his

contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary or

intelligent because he did not “move to withdraw the plea on the same

grounds [now] alleged on appeal or else file a motion to vacate the

judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10” (People v Peque, 22

NY3d 168, 182, cert denied ___ US ___, 135 S Ct 90; see People v

Robinson, 64 AD3d 1248, 1248, lv denied 13 NY3d 862; see generally

People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). Further, we conclude that this is

not one of those “rare case[s]” in which, during the plea allocution,

“defendant’s recitation of the facts underlying the crime pleaded to

clearly casts significant doubt upon . . . defendant’s guilt or

otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea” (Lopez,

71 NY2d at 666). 

Entered: May 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

             PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of American Natural Energy Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael K. Paulk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael K. Paulk
---------------------
Michael K. Paulk
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David Lieberman, Chief Accounting Officer ofWorld Health Energy Holdings, Inc.,(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  /s/David LiebermanDavid LiebermanChief Accounting Officer
 Date: November 15, 2010








_______________
 
 This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105

- 2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

Ma y 27 , 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Tractor Tire Rolling Resistance Data Evaluation

FROM: Angela Cullen

, Director of Data and Testing, OTAQ/A SD

TO: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium

and Heavy

- Duty Engines and Vehicles

- Phase 2

- Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2014

-

08 27

Introduction

This memorandum presents available information on the range of coefficients of rolling

resistance (CRR) of tires that are manufactured for tractor applications. These were identified by

the manufacturer’s description of intended vehicle applica tion specified when the tire was

obtained for testing and the data submitted by manufacturers for certification

. Tires with

applications listed exclusi vely as “line haul” or “long haul ” are presented here

. Tires with

applications that included “ trailer ”

, “bucket truck”, “bus”, “city delivery”, “construct ion”, “high

scrub”, “intercity coach”, “local P&D”, “mixed service”, “on/off road”, “on/off highway”

, “regional”, “RV”, “refuse”, “school bus”, “short haul,” and “special service” have all been

ex cluded from this analysis.

The tire CRR presented in this memorandum are based on data obtained by

manufacturers between Feb ruary 2012 and Dec ember 2013 and reported to NHTSA and EPA.

For a variety of reasons, including questions about representativeness of the tire test data

and unknown sales volumes, the agencies have not predicated the Phase 2 tractor standards on

future market adoption rates that align with these tire CRR distributions , though the proposed

standards are informed by these distributions

. In a ddition, this data was not used to determine

the baseline CRR of the existing fleet because of the lack of sales volume information. The

purpose of presenting th is data i s to demonstrate that there is a wide range of CRR on tires that

are commercially available for use on tractors

.2

Data Summar y

In Figure 1, the minimum CRR of the set of s teer or all

- position tires intended for tractor

applications is 4.3 kg/metric ton

. The steer tires had an average CRR of 6.2 kg/ metric ton.

Figure 1 : Steer Tire Rolling Resistance

In Figure 2, the minimum CRR of the set of drive position tires intended for tractor

applications is 5.0 kg/metric ton . The drive tires had an average CRR of 7.4 kg/ metric ton.3 Figure 2 : Drive Tire Rolling Resistance