alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1251 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1251

To permit Members of the House of Representatives to use their unspent 
        official allowances for reduction of the national debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1993

    Mr. Bartlett of Maryland (for himself, Mr. Armey, Mr. Bachus of 
Alabama, Mr. Baker of California, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Blute, 
 Mr. Canady, Mr. Castle, Mr. Cox, Mr. Crane, Mr. Crapo, Mr. DeLay, Mr. 
   Dickey, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Everett, Mrs. 
  Fowler, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Grams, Mr. 
   Greenwood, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Horn, Mr. Huffington, Mr. 
 Hunter, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Istook, Mr. Kim, Mr. King, Mr. 
Kingston, Mr. Klug, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Lewis 
of Florida, Mr. Manzullo, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Miller of Florida, 
 Mr. McCollum, Mr. McHugh, Mr. McInnis, Mr. McKeon, Mr. McMillan, Mr. 
   Mica, Ms. Molinari, Mr. Pombo, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Quinn, Mr. 
 Roberts, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Royce, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Shays, Mr. Smith 
of Michigan, Mr. Spence, Mr. Thomas of California, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. 
 Weldon, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Ms. English of Arizona, Mr. Gene Green of 
Texas, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Minge, and Mr. Penny) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit Members of the House of Representatives to use their unspent 
        official allowances for reduction of the national debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNSPENT AMOUNTS FROM ALLOWANCES OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES TO BE AVAILABLE FOR NATIONAL DEBT 
              REDUCTION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, to the extent that an 
allowance of a Member of the House of Representatives is not otherwise 
used for a purpose specified by law or other authority, such allowance 
shall be available to the Member for reduction of the national debt.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act--
            (1) the term ``Member of the House of Representatives'' 
        means a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident 
        Commissioner to, the Congress; and
            (2) the term ``allowance'' means, with respect to a Member 
        of the House of Representatives, the official expenses 
        allowance, the clerk hire allowance, the official mail 
        allowance, or any other official allowance of the Member.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 91 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 91

 Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
 for cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation 
               pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2010

    Mr. Berman (for himself and Mr. Rohrabacher) (both by request) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the approval of the Congress of the proposed agreement 
 for cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation 
               pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does favor 
the proposed agreement for cooperation transmitted to the Congress by 
the President on May 10, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
Jonathan Brousseau

2233 Ala wai apt 2b

Honolulu Hawaii 96815

808 384-2691

skillet808@yahoo.com

Aloha,

This is my petition for the use of Unmanned aerial

vehicles(drones) for the specific use of aerial

photography and videography. I have been using

these for 5 years now and have been flying

model airplanes and helicopters for about 20 years..

In the past 5 years I have designed, built and flown 

multi rotor craft. Learning about all aspects and operations.

Although I am not a FAA certified pilot, I have 

observed and learned about aviation since a kid.

Have about 5 hours on my uncles Cessna. 

My purpose is entirely for photography reasons

and have no interest in flying these in a unsafe manor

doing tricks or acrobatics.

In Hawaii I was one of the first flying these types of

craft and have always stuck to safety and planning..

I have given classes and one on one instruction to

more than a dozen people and am committed to the

eduction and safety regarding unmanned aircraft..

Thanks for listening,

Jonathan
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.11


April 27, 2005

Eugene J. DiDonato
150 Shaw Road
Brookline, MA 02467

Dear Gene:

Lightbridge, Inc. is exploring strategic alternatives for its TDS business unit,
including, without limitation, the possibility of selling the business unit.  We
recognize this news creates uncertainty for you and other employees.  Throughout
this process, we ask that you continue to focus on the day-to-day success of the
business.  In recognition of this challenge, this letter confirms that you are a
participant in the following program.

You will be eligible to receive a bonus of $75,000 upon the closing of a
strategic transaction (including, without limitation, a sale) with respect to
the TDS business unit, provided you are employed by Lightbridge at the date of
the closing.  This bonus is payable on the first scheduled pay date after the
close of such strategic transaction.

I know we can count on your continued active participation as a key member of
the team.  Thank you, in advance, for your support.

Sincerely,


Robert Donahue
President and CEO




AGREED:         _____________________________________   _______________
                Employee Signature                      Date
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-311-Y 

 § 

RODERICK STEFFON SCOTT (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED December 15, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00311-Y Document 25 Filed 12/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     412
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     514
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                6,067
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     29,879
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       29,422
<LOANS>                                    47,645
<ALLOWANCE>                                374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             87,874
<DEPOSITS>                                 54,511
<SHORT-TERM>                               0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        872
<LONG-TERM>                                17,424
<COMMON>                                   14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                 15,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             87,874
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            1,865
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          1,217
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           34
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           3,116
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         1,096
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,557
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      1,559
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              8
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            1,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            338
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 243
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.73
<LOANS-NON>                                0
<LOANS-PAST>                               45
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            31
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           367
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              1
<RECOVERIES>                               1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          374
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    374
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
13**
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Berkley Resources Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Matt Wayrynen, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
    the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:
June 29,
2005                                                                   
*/s/ Matt
Wayrynen*
 Matt Wayrynen, Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
 
   49
<PAGE>
     
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
     
                         Consent of Independent Auditors
     
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
of SBM Certificate Company for the year ended December 31, 1997, of our report 
dated February 9, 1998, included in Post Effective Amendment No. 9 to the 
Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 33-38066) and related Prospectus 
("Registration Statement"), with respect to the financial statement schedules of
SBM Certificate Company listed in Item 16(b) of the Registration Statement.
     
                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
     
Louisville, Kentucky
February 23, 1998
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00363-CR

Style: Ruben Munoz

v. The State of Texas

Date motions filed*: December 7 and 18, 2015; January 6, 2016

Type of motions: Requests for Extension of Time to File Brief and 

“Second Request for Extension of Time to File Brief”

Party filing motions: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 7, 2015

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested: January 20, 2016

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted—“Second Request for Extension of Time to File Brief,” 

If document is to be filed, document due: January 20, 2016

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed—“Request for Extension of Time to File Brief,” filed December 7, 2015, and “Request for 

Extension of Time to File Brief,” filed December 18, 2015

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant’s “Second Request for Extension of Time to File Brief,” filed on January 6, 2016, is granted. The time 

to file appellant’s brief is extended to January 20, 2016. 

Appellant’s “Request for Extension of Time to File Brief,” filed on December 7, 2015, and “Request for 

Extension of Time to File Brief,” filed on December 18, 2015, are dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually 

Date: February 9, 2016
1789,

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.c.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

January 15, 2013

The Honorable John A. Boehner
Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Speaker:

I am writing to notify you, as required under 5 U.S.C. § 8438(h)(2), of my determination that, by
reason of the statutory debt limit, I will be unable to invest fully the Government Securities
Investment Fund (G Fund) of the Federal Employees’ Retirement System in interest-bearing
securities of the United States, beginning on Tuesday, January 15, 2013. The statute governing
G Fund investments expressly authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to suspend investment of
the G Fund to avoid breaching the statutory debt limit. Both my predecessors and I have taken
this suspension action during previous debt limit impasses. By law, the G Fund will be made
whole once the debt limit is increased. Federal retirees and employees will be unaffected by this

Loh F bok

Timothy &/ Geithner

Identical letter sent to:
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader
The Honorable Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader
The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican Leader

cc: The Honorable Dave Camp, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Sander M. Levin, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means
The Honorable Max Baucus, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance
The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance
exv10w22



 






Exhibit 10.22




Lockheed Martin Kelly
Aviation Center 
661 Duncan
Drive, Building 360
 Kelly
AFB,TX 78241








2 May 2002

In reply refer to:

02-LJV-S0089




Standard Aero

661 Duncan Drive, Room 213

San Antonio, TX 78226



Attn: Jim Hanley




	 	 	 
	Subject:

	 	Amendment 24, Exercise of Option
	 
	

	 	Reference: LMKAC Subcontract No. 98-0001





This amendment incorporates changes to the reference subcontract as detailed below.
Except as specifically changed by this agreement, the existing contract terms and
conditions remain unchanged.



4.2 Option Periods



In accordance the award term provisions of the PBA contract, LMKAC hereby exercises
the option to extend the term of the subcontract by one year. The subcontract now
extends until February 2007



Regards,




/s/ Lornia J. Villalobos



Lornia J. Villalobos

Subcontracts Administrator


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



I concur with the above price change for Amendment No. 24 to LMKAC subcontract LM 98-001.




	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	          /s/
Lornia J. Villalobos	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Signed
	 	
	

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	          July 9, 2002	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Date	 	 






Tuesday, March 08, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto D. Hasbun, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered January 31, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Zawistowski, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Because defendant, in this nonjury trial, did not sign a written waiver of his right to a trial by jury, his conviction cannot be sustained *(see,*NY Const, art I, § *2;*CPL 320.10). It is difficult to comprehend why the trial court, having initially recognized this fundamental error, refused to grant defense counsel’s timely CPL 330.30 motion *(see, Zawistowski v Arcara,*132 AD2d 1000, *lv denied*70 NY2d 604). Additionally, it was error for Supreme Court to close the courtroom, over defendant’s objection, without making adequate inquiry or possessing a compelling reason for doing so, during the testimony of the alcoholism counselor *(see, People v Jones,*47 NY2d 409, 413-417, *cert denied*444 US 946). Further, the trial court overstepped its bounds and assumed the role of a prosecutor by engaging in excessive examination of witnesses and, on its own motion, recalling a witness to testify after the close of the prosecution’s case *(see, People v Jacobsen,*140 AD2d 938, 940; *People v Ellis,*62 AD2d 469, 470-471).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme *951Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—attempted murder, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lawton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-Q for the six months months ended December 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            6191
<SECURITIES>                                      2442
<RECEIVABLES>                                    28306
<ALLOWANCES>                                       720
<INVENTORY>                                      32578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 69382
<PP&E>                                           40328
<DEPRECIATION>                                   25099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  101762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            30531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       8321
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                       52268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    101762
<SALES>                                          58449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 61937
<CGS>                                            30742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    30742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 33150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    743
<INCOME-TAX>                                       223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                520
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       520
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04



</TABLE>
March 23 , 2015

Harold C. Schuch, PE, CP, LSI

GeoCounsel, Inc.

31 Manzanita

Littleton, CO 80127

Dear Mr. Schuch :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your J anuary 27 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of GeoCounsel, Inc. into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0224 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consid er the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you m ay call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Description of Amendment to LNC Executives



 Exhibit 10(c) 
  
 Description of Amendment to Lincoln National Corporation Executives’ Excess Compensation Pension Benefit Plan, Effective January 1,
1989: 
  
 Effective January 1, 2005: removal of the existing cap
on the amount of annual bonus (50% of bonus in excess of $100,000) that qualifies as compensation eligible for pension benefits.