alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Public Comment received 12/08/2013 on document DOD-2013-OS-0225-0001

(Comment Tracking Number 1jx-896c-b2bq):

Changing “Grievance and Unfair Labor Practices Records. To ”“Grievance and Unfair 

Labor Practice Records.” denotes That A Person Can Only File One Grievance Issue At 

A Time. Especially If The Violation Includes Rape. It Would Clog Up Hearing Room 

And Create Red Tape Until the petitioner Hopefully Give Up Perusing The Complaint.

________________________________________________________________________

OSD Response to Public Comment on DoD-2013-OS-0225-0001

A single comment was received raising concerns that changes to the System of Records 

Notice would allow individuals to submit only one grievance issue at a time “clogging up 

and creating red tape,” effectively discouraging complainants.

The Office of the Secretary of Defense takes allegations of sexual assaults as well as 

grievance and unfair labor practices seriously. The System of Records Notice is not the 

mechanism to address general comments regarding otherwise established mechanisms for 

processing grievances and unfair labor practices. A System of Records Notice provides 

an affirmative notice of an Agency’s privacy practice for a specific grouping of records 

protected by the Privacy Act of 1974.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Azhar M. Chaudhary v. Victoria A. Mora and Kristie R. Salter

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00352

- CV

Trial court case number: 18

- DCV

- 254442

Trial court: 434th Dist rict Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant Azhar M. Cha udhary has filed a combined motion for rehearing and for en

banc reconsideration . The Court requests a response. The appellees ’ response is due

November 3, 2022

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Peter Kelly

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ October 20, 2022

____
# Official Journal L 259/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 259 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6421 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 259

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6421 July 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1199 of 20 July 2021 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in granules or mulches used as infill material in synthetic turf pitches or in loose form on playgrounds or in sport applications (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1200 of 19 July 2021 extending the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union and appointing the next Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union | 6 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1201 of 16 July 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/668 as regards harmonised standards on hearing protectors | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1199 of 20 July 2021 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in granules or mulches used as infill material in synthetic turf pitches or in loose form on playgrounds or in sport applications (
  1
  )

1

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1200 of 19 July 2021 extending the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union and appointing the next Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union

6

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1201 of 16 July 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/668 as regards harmonised standards on hearing protectors

8

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 488/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 488 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5929 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 488

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5929 December 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2016/C 488/01 | List of national contact points as referred to in Article 3(1) of the Council Decision on the transmission of samples of controlled substances (2001/419/JHA) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2016/C 488/01

List of national contact points as referred to in Article 3(1) of the Council Decision on the transmission of samples of controlled substances (2001/419/JHA)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 488/02 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 488/02

Euro exchange rates

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1289 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1289

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
      eligibility of veterans for mortgage revenue bond financing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1993

 Mr. Kopetski (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Stark, Mr. Young of 
Alaska, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Furse, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Wilson, 
Mr. de la Garza, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Frost, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Tejeda, Mr. 
   Edwards of Texas, Mr. Chapman, Mr. Sarpalius, Ms. E.B. Johnson of 
    Texas, Mr. Bryant, Mr. Coleman, and Mr. McHale) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
      eligibility of veterans for mortgage revenue bond financing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) paragraph (4) 
of section 143(l) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 
qualified veteran) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Qualified veteran.--For purposes of this subsection, 
        the term `qualified veteran' means any veteran who meets such 
        requirements as may be imposed by the State law pursuant to 
        which qualified veterans' mortgage bonds are issued.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to obligations 
issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-365-E (01) 

 § 

DORCUS DONELLE SPEARMAN § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

DORCUS DONELLE SPEARMAN, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 

F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of 

guilty to Count 1 of the 1-Count Indictment, filed on September 27, 2022. After cautioning and 

examining Defendant Dorcus Donelle Spearman, under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned 

in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged 

is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I 

therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that Defendant Dorcus Donelle Spearman,

be adjudged guilty of Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon, in violation of 18 USC § 922(g)(1) 

and 924(a)(2), and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the 

district judge. 

□ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear 

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

□ The Government does not oppose release. 

□ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

□ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to 

any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or 

(c).

□ The Government opposes release.

□ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

□ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there 

is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly 

shown under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

 Signed May 25, 2023. ____________________________________ 

 REBECCA RUTHERFORD

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date 

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United 

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).

Case 3:22-cr-00365-E Document 24 Filed 05/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        384
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        739
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 5,435
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     30,180
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       29,547
<LOANS>                                    48,839 
<ALLOWANCE>                                   378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             88,923
<DEPOSITS>                                 54,566
<SHORT-TERM>                                    0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           959
<LONG-TERM>                                19,072
<COMMON>                                       14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 14,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             88,923
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             2,849
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           1,798
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               60
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            4,707
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          1,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,390
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       2,317
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  11
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             1,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               710
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    501
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               2.74
<LOANS-NON>                                     0
<LOANS-PAST>                                  128
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              367
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   1
<RECOVERIES>                                    1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             378
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       378
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-31185

Summary Calendar

KEYNEL KNIGHT,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:08-CV-4721

Before WIENER, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner-Appellant Keynel Knight, Louisiana prisoner # 483673, appeals

the dismissal of his application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2004

conviction of second degree murder. Knight contends that trial counsel rendered

ineffective assistance by interfering with his right to testify in his own behalf at

trial, and that the federal district court erred in failing to develop the record as

to this issue.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 4, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-31185 Document: 00511712999 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2012
No. 10-31185

As Knight’s ineffective-assistance claim was adjudicated by the state court

on its merits, the district court’s review was limited to the record before the state

court. See Cullen v. Pinholster, 131 S. Ct. 1388, 1398-1402 (2011). Knight’s

conclusional and self-serving contentions in the state court are insufficient to

carry his burden of showing that the state court’s rejection of this claim was

contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established

Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, or that

it resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the

facts in light of the evidence presented. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). The judgment

is 

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-31185 Document: 00511712999 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2012
#### TIJERINA v. STATE.

No. 20591.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

J. Fielding Jones and R. C. Wilson, both of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property under the value of $50. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for six months and a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order. Appellant’s objections to *124the court’s charge cannot be reviewed in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1451 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1451

 To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include 
Montgomery, Roanoke, and Rockbridge Counties, Virginia, as part of the 
                          Appalachian region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1993

 Mr. Goodlatte (for himself and Mr. Boucher) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include 
Montgomery, Roanoke, and Rockbridge Counties, Virginia, as part of the 
                          Appalachian region.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF MONTGOMERY, ROANOKE, AND ROCKBRIDGE COUNTIES, 
              VIRGINIA, AS PART OF APPALACHIAN REGION.

    The 12th undesignated paragraph of section 403 of the Appalachian 
Regional Development Act of 1965 (40 U.S.C. App. 403) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Montgomery,'' after ``Lee,''; and
            (2) by inserting ``Roanoke, Rockbridge,'' after 
        ``Pulaski,''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-27-1997
<CASH>                                          34,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,547
<INVENTORY>                                      5,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,270
<PP&E>                                         219,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,369
<BONDS>                                            329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,110
<SALES>                                        290,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               299,928
<CGS>                                          111,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,316)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>