alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1,934,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,156,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         43,000
<INVENTORY>                                         224,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,403,000
<PP&E>                                            1,512,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,114,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,764,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               995,000
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             26,000
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,257,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,764,000
<SALES>                                           1,495,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,495,000
<CGS>                                               648,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       648,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    973,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (103,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (103,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (103,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.03)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,473
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,474
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,025
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,403
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,124
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,146
<LOANS>                                        148,034
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,776
<DEPOSITS>                                     148,377
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,022
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,247
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 184,776
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,337
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  898
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,235
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,678
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,853
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,382
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,481
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,481
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,564
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .909
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .906
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.82
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       275
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    238
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,124
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        1
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,123
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,123
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            231
        

</TABLE>
**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting, April 9th 2014**

**Attendance List**

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST §

COMPANY, as Indenture Trustee of the §

Aames Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-1, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00572-O

 § 

JESSE A. VALVERDE, et al., §

§ 

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 15) is 

GRANTED. The Court enters DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Jesse and Yolanda Valverde and 

awards attorney fees in an amount to be determined by subsequent motion and order. 

SO ORDERED on this 6th day of December, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00572-O Document 20 Filed 12/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 156
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

SEP 8 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

PUBLISH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re:

MICHAEL C. WASHINGTON,

Petitioner.

No. 97-731

ORDER

Filed September 8, 1997

Before BALDOCK and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Michael C. Washington has filed for a writ in the nature of

mandamus under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. He also seeks leave of this

court to proceed with his petition without the prepayment of fees, and has

submitted the necessary forms and declarations. Because we conclude that

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prevents petitioner from proceeding in forma pauperis in this

proceeding, we deny petitioner leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. 

“Section 1915(g) generally prevents a prisoner from proceeding in forma

pauperis in civil actions if three or more of his prior suits have been dismissed as

frivolous or malicious, or for failure to state a claim.” Green v. Nottingham,

90 F.3d 415, 418 (10th Cir. 1996). As in Green, petitioner here has filed three or
-2-

more such actions. See Washington v. Loving, No. 96-6192, 1997 WL 111259, at

**2 (10th Cir. March 13, 1997) (affirming the district court’s dismissal of

petitioner’s complaint as “legally meritless and factually baseless”); Washington

v. Loving, No 94-6466, 1995 WL 421131, at **1 (10th Cir. July 18, 1995)

(commenting that petitioner had filed four frivolous actions in the Western

District of Oklahoma and sixteen frivolous actions in the Eastern District of

Oklahoma). Petitioner’s history satisfies the requirements of § 1915(g). 

In Green this court concluded that petitions for mandamus qualify as “civil

actions” under § 1915(g). See 90 F.3d at 418. Accordingly, petitioner cannot file

this petition without prepayment of costs or fees. Further, we direct the clerk of

this court not to accept from petitioner any future filings of extraordinary writs in

noncriminal matters or appeals of judgment in civil actions or proceedings unless

he first pays the applicable filing fees, except in those instances that petitioner’s

filings claim that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner may

resubmit his petition by paying the required filing fee, see 10th Cir. R. 21.1. 

 Entered for the Court

 PATRICK FISHER, Clerk
SERVED JANUARY 5,201 0 ^^^^ ^'MMOmm 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

Webco Aircraft Company 

FAA DOCKET No. CP09CE0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0839 

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT MOTION 

This matter currently is scheduled to be heard beginning March 8, 2010. 

Respondent Webco Akcraft Company ("Respondent") on December 14, 2009, filed a 

Motion to Amend the Procedural Order and Reset the Trial Date ("Motion"). It asks that 

the hearing be rescheduled to a date at least 90 days after a hearing before the National 

Transportation Safety Board ("NTSB"), scheduled for February 11, 2010, which 

involves a related matter and the same counsel. Discovery in the NTSB matter may be 

used in the instant case, Respondent asserts, and that circumstance necessitates 

postponement of the discovery deadlines set by the October 1,2009 Procedural Order to 

March 1,2010, and the concomitant continuation of the hearing. Complainant Federal 

Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has not answered the Motion. 

For good cause shown. Respondent's Motion is hereby GRANTED. The 

discovery deadlines set by the Procedural Order are hereby extended to March 1, 2010. 

Additionally, the hearing is hereby continued; it will be rescheduled by subsequent order. 
SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP09CE0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert Weber, President 

Webco Aircreift Company, Respondent 

1134 N.Oliver Road 

Newton, KS 67114-9446 

Edward A. McConwell, Respondent's Counsel 

McConwell Law Offices 

5925 Beveriy 

Mission, KS 66202 

TEL: 913-262-0605 

FAX: 913-262-0652 

David Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Coimsel, ACE-7, Central Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building, 901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor: 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant: 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2055

LAWRENCE D. MORDEROSIAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES S. GILMORE, III, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-00-1163-A) Submitted: January 15, 2002 Decided: January 24, 2002 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence D. Morderosian, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Ann Berkebile, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence D. Morderosian seeks to appeal the district court’sorder denying his motion for extension of time to appeal its dismissal of his civil action. The district court entered an order on July 16, 2001 granting Morderosian thirty days in which to appeal its April 30, 2001 order denying him an extension of time to appeal. The court later emphasized in a July 31, 2001 order that Morderosian had until August 15, 2001 to note his appeal. We conclude the district court was without jurisdiction to so extend the appeal period because more than sixty days had lapsed since the April 30, 2001 order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(c). In any event, Morderosian’s notice of appeal was not filed until August 17, 2001. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Morderosian’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of Digital Donations Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge
that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2015 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Keith Orlean
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 13, 2016
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 21173.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

Percy Foreman, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

No statement of facts is brought forward. We are unable to appraise appellant’s bills of exception in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Skip to main content


NCD.gov
      
      
      -A +ASearch form
    SearchFollow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter About UsNewsroomNewsroom HomeTestimony & SpeechesNewsletterFunding OpportunitiesProgress ReportsPublicationsResourcesFAQsMeeting & EventsOther Events30 on ADA 30NCD policy briefings to Congressional staff on AbilityOne ReportAccountabilityBuy American Act ReportsGovernment Performance and Results Act ReportsCongressional Budget Justification ReportsFinancial Audit ReportsNCD Strategic PlanNCD Annual Employee SurveyNCD BylawsNo Fear ActFOIAFOIA e-LibraryAnnual ReportsQuarterly ReportsChief FOIA Officer ReportsMake a FOIA RequestReference GuideNCD FOIA RegulationEquity
 Preview NCD's New NCD.gov Website in Beta
  
  Take a look at the new beta site, an early, in-progress version at beta.NCD.gov
          Page not foundSkip to Page ContentThe requested page "/rawmedia_repository/annualreport_2001.pdf" could not be found. NCD Policy Areas
  
  CRPDCivil RightsCultural DiversityEducationEmergency ManagementEmploymentFinancial Assistance & IncentivesHealth CareHousingInternationalLong Term Services & SupportTechnologyTransportationYouth Perspectives Contact Us
  
  If you have a question or comment, please let us know.
202-272-2004 (voice)
202-272-2022 (Fax)   Email NCD   Language Access Needs? Stay Connected with NCD
  
  Subscribe to NCD Updates   Newsroom   Join us on Facebook   Follow us on Twitter   Follow us on Instagram   Subscribe to our YouTube Channel   Follow us on LinkedIn   Meetings and Events   Link to Us   NCD Council & Staff
Employment Opportunities
 **National Council on Disability**   1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850   Washington, DC 20004
```

[Federal Register: September 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 169)]
[Notices]               
[Page 53730]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01se10-112]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7145]

 
Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Roman Mosaic from Lod, Israel''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Roman Mosaic from Lod, Israel,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about September 28, 2010, 
until on or about April 3, 2011, the Legion of Honor Museum, San 
Francisco, California, from on or about April 23, 2011, until on or 
about July 24, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 25, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-21848 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID W. ROBERTS and

ROYAL PALM PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

CHRISTIE’S GREAT ESTATES, INC. n/k/a CHRISTIE’S 

INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE, INC., a Florida Corporation,

PREMIER ESTATE PROPERTIES, INC., GERARD P. LIGUORI, 

CARMEN N. D’ANGELO, JR., JOSEPH G. LIGUORI, RICK S. 

FELBERBAUM, individually, and FELBERBAUM & ASSOCIATES, P.A., 

a Florida professional association,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-531

[March 1, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Palm Beach County; Meenu Sasser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50 2009CA40545 

(AI).

Robert J. Hauser of Pankauski Hauser PLLC, West Palm Beach, Gerald 

F. Richman, Gary S. Betensky and Brett L. Goldblatt of Richman Greer, 

P.A., West Palm Beach, and Robert A. Sweetapple of Sweetapple, Broeker 

& Varkas, Boca Raton, for appellants.

Stephen A. Mendelsohn, Jerold I. Budney of Greenberg Traurig, 

P.A., Boca Raton, Elliot H. Scherker and Brigid F. Cech Samole of 

Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for appellees Rick S. Felberbaum and 

Felberbaum & Associates, P.A.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,648
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,116
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,050
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,570
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,421
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,469
<LOANS>                                        137,117
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,571
<DEPOSITS>                                     135,234
<SHORT-TERM>                                        43
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,005
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 163,571
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,891
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,233
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,694
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,700
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,533
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    982
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         982
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.79
<LOANS-NON>                                         68
<LOANS-PAST>                                       177
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    371
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,145
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,145
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,145
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            261
        

</TABLE>
Calendar No. 142

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1347

[Report No. 103–97]

AN ACT

To modify the boundary of Hot Springs National

Park.

JULY 16 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 142

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1347

[Report No. 103–97]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

JULY 16 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Reported by Mr. JOHNSTON, without amendment

AN ACT

To modify the boundary of Hot Springs National Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the boundary of Hot Springs National Park is modi4 fied as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Proposed Boundary

5 Map’’, numbered 128/80015, and dated August 5, 1985.

Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.