# December 21, 2011

Ms. Lily Wong US EPA, Region 9, Air Division

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Re: SCAQMD Rule 317 Section 172(e) Fee Equivalent Programs

Dear Ms. Wong:

This is in response to your inquiry regarding Rule 317 and, specifically, the programs that the SCAQMD is planning to use as “qualified” programs to fund the Rule 317 Section 172 (e) fee equivalency account, why they are surplus to the one-hour ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) and certain other pertinent questions. Our response to your inquiry is provided below in a question and answer format.

1) What are the “qualified” programs SCAQMD is planning to use to fund the Rule 317 equivalency account?

As you know, Rule 317 is designed to satisfy the requirements specified in Sections 182(e), 182(f) and 185 of the 1990 amendments to the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) by utilizing a fee equivalency approach as allowed under Section 172(e) of the CAA. The rule establishes and maintains a Section 172(e) fee equivalency account for each of the two non-attainment basins in the SCAQMD - the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) classified as “Extreme” and the Riversideportion of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) classified as “Severe-17 nonattainment areas. Each basin’s equivalency account is credited with expenditures from certain “qualified” programs and debited with Section 185 fees that would otherwise be applicable to major stationary sources. Only programs that satisfy all criteria listed in Rule 317, subparagraph (c) (1) (A) are considered “qualified” and eligible for crediting the fee equivalency account. In response to your inquiry, Exhibit A to this letter lists a compilation of programs that will be used to pre-fund the equivalency accounts for the SCAB and the Riverside portion of SSAB. These programs are typically funded by local, state, and/or federal funding. It should be noted that the fee equivalency account will be credited with actual expenditures in 2010 and beyond (except that the funding for the Riverside portion of the SSAB will include actual expenditures in that basin for 2008 and beyond), invested in projects that reduce or facilitate the reduction of VOC and/or NOx emissions, and not by the funding that may be available for a given year. For illustration purposes, Exhibit A also includes estimates of the actual expenditures in 2010 and 2011 for most of the listed programs that will be used to prefund the two equivalency accounts as well as the local, state, and/or federal

# Ms. Lily Wong - 2 - December 21, 2011

funding level contributed. Please note that the availability of additional local, state and/or federal matching funds for many of the programs listed in Exhibit A allowed the actual expenditures to exceed the funding level estimates included in the staff report for the same programs.

Exhibit B to this letter provides a compilation of programs that meet all criteria in subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of Rule 317 and will be used to fund on an on-going basis the two equivalency accounts in the future. For information purposes, Exhibit B also includes the level of funding expected to be available for each of the programs. As stated above, however, actual expenditures may vary from the funding estimates depending on the availability of additional matching funds from

local, state or federal sources.

As part of this letter, we are fo rmally requesting that the programs identified in Exhibits A and B be approved as satisfying the requirement of Rule 317(c)(1)(A)(i).

2) Why are the programs listed in Exhibits A and B considered “qualified”?

The programs listed in Exhibits A and B are considered “qualified” because they satisfy all criteria listed in subparagraph (c)(1)(A) of Rule 317, as follows:

a. They satisfy clause (c)(1)(A)(i) of Rule 317 because, as demonstrated below, they are all surplus to the approved one-hour ozone SIP, and

b. They satisfy clause (c)(1)(A)(ii) of Rule 317 because they facilitate VOC and NOx emission reductions (in addition to other criteria and toxic pollutant emissions) from the mobile source sector (mostly from on-road sources and to a limited extent from some off-road sources) in the South Coast Air Basin and the Riverside portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin by providing incentive funding that advances the state of the mobile source technology, improves fuel and engine infrastructure and accelerates fleet turnover through vehicle retrofit and/or replacement, and

c. They satisfy clauses (c)(1)(A)(iii) and (iv) of Rule 317 because the equivalency accounts will be credited with actual program expenditures incurred during a given year (2010 and beyond for SCAB and 2008 and beyond for SSAB) and not the program funding that may be available but remain unspent during the same year. US EPA will be able to verify compliance with the two clauses through the review of the annual equivalency emission reports SCAQMD will be providing pursuant to paragraph (c)(5).

Please also be aware that SCAQMD produces reports for each of the program that summarize annual program activities and are available upon request.

# Ms. Lily Wong - 3 - December 21, 2011

Based on the above analysis, SCAQMD staff concludes that the programs listed in Exhibits A and B are “qualified” programs, eligible to fund the Rule 317 equivalency accounts.

3) What is the difference between the programs listed in Attachments B and C to the February 2011 Final Staff Report for Proposed Amended Rule 317?

Regarding your query about the difference between Attachments B and C to the February 2011 Final Staff Report, Attachment B lists the funding programs that staff was able to determine during the rule development process that could meet all four criteria of subparagraph (c) (1) (A) of Rule 317 including being surplus to the one-hour SIP. Attachment C included all other funding programs; however, staff was unable to complete the surplus to the one-hour SIP analysis within the time constraints of the rule development process, necessary to list them as “qualified” programs under Attachment B. Since the rule adoption, however, staff has completed its analysis and determined, as indicated in the response to question #4 below, that the programs listed in Attachment C to the February 2011 Final Staff Report are also surplus to the one-hour SIP. As indicated in the response to Question 1 above, the revised list of funding programs that staff intends to use to fund the two equivalency accounts on an on-going basis is

included as Exhibit B to this letter.

4) Why are the programs in Exhibits A and B surplus to the one-hour ozone SIP?

The 1997 South Coast AQMP, as amended in 1999, and approved by US EPA in April 10, 2000 (65 FR 18903), which was subsequently modified by those elements of the 2003 South Coast SIP approved by US EPA in March 10, 2009 (74 FR 10176) constitutes the one-hour ozone SIP for the SCAQMD. A careful evaluation of the base year, future year baseline, and controlled emission inventories included in that one-hour SIP will reveal that SCAQMD’s attainment demonstration for the one-hour ozone standard does not reference nor rely upon the implementation of any of the programs listed in Exhibits A and B. More specifically, please examine (1) Table 1-3 of the 2003 AQMP, (2) Tables 3-1 through 3-5 in Chapter III of the 2003 AQMP, (3) the mobile source control measures, including the emission reduction strategies, and underlying assumptions associated with each of the mobile source control measures listed in Table 4-4, (4) the emission reduction commitments depicted in Tables 4-6 through 4-8 and Table 4-11 in Chapter IV of the 1997 AQMP, (5) and the corresponding elements of the mobile source control measures and emission reduction commitments specified in Chapter IV of the 2003 AQMP to the extent they were included in the October 24, 2008, proposed approval of the 2003 South Coast SIP (74 FR 63408) and subsequently approved by US EPA in March 10, 2009. Similarly, a careful review of the more detailed emission baselines for current and future years included in (6) Appendix III and its attachments of the 1997 AQMP, and 2003 AQMP will reveal that none of them include a line item or assumptions that rely upon the implementation of any of the programs listed in

# Ms. Lily Wong - 4 - December 21, 2011

Exhibits A and B. (Exhibit C of this letter details the above AQMP references). Based on the above analysis, SCAQMD staff concludes that the programs identified in Exhibits A and B attached to this letter are surplus to the one-hour ozone SIP and, therefore, eligible for funding the Rule 317 Section 172(e) fee equivalency account.

5) How will the equivalency account be tracked for the two Basins in the

SCAQMD?

Please note that, as acknowledged in Rule 317, because there are two nonattainment air basins in the jurisdictional authority of the SCAQMD, staff would like to clarify that it is committed to maintain two separate fee equivalency accounts to independently track and demonstrate fee equivalency for each air basin. Program expenditures in each basin will be tracked separately and the equivalency account for each of the basins will be credited only with that portion of program expenditures that is incurred in that basin. Consequently, to satisfy the annual reporting obligations to CARB and US EPA specified in paragraph (c)(5) of Rule 317, SCAQMD staff commits to prepare and forward two separate equivalency demonstrations, one for each of the basins in the SCAQMD. We should point out that the internal tracking mechanism to track when and where the expenditures are being incurred is already in place. However, please be reminded that, as specified in sub-paragraph (c)(1)(C) and paragraphs (c)(4) and (c)(5) of Rule 317, any unused portion of the funds (surplus credit for a given year) will be carried over to the following year to satisfy the applicable fee obligation of the respective air basin and cannot be claimed by another entity to satisfy its Section 185(e) fee obligation without the explicit consent of the SCAQMD. Only actual expenditure will be used for the equivalency demonstration.

6) Why is the aggregate baseline adjustment appropriate?

SCAQMD staff is proposing an aggregate baseline adjustment for the universe of facilities subject to Rule 317 to address year to year variability displayed in annual facility emissions. While there may be several reasons causing the variability in emissions, year to year variability in facilities activity levels is among the principal ones. The option of adjusting a facility’s baseline was provided in the memorandum by William T. Harnett, Director US EPA Air Quality Division to Regional Air Division Director dated March 31, 2008 (Harnett memo). While the Harnett memo referred to facilities with emissions that are “cyclical, irregular or otherwise vary from year to year”, no actual definition for any of the three terms was proffered. To conform with the intent of the guidance provided and for implementation consistency, staff included a programmatic adjustment for all facilities subject to Rule 317 to establish their baseline using Fiscal Year 2005/2006 and Fiscal Year 2006/2007 emissions as reported through SCAQMD’s annual emissions system. This approach provides a more realistic emission baseline compared to 2010 emission levels which were strongly influenced by the ongoing economic downturn. Further, this approach

# Ms. Lily Wong - 5 - December 21, 2011

provides a more conservative baseline resulting in a higher facility universe-wide Section 185 fee obligation than the one resulting from allowing each facility to pick their highest two consecutive years (see Exhibit D to this letter) and avoids the uncertainty of defining “cyclical, irregular and/or variable emissions. Furthermore, using a programmatic adjustment for calculating baseline, such as the one included in Rule 317, satisfies the Harnett memo requirement to adjust analternative baseline for regulatory effect but obviates the need for a facility-byfacility adjustment. Specifically, the Fiscal Year 2006/2007 emissions will be adjusted to account for rule effects that occurred subsequent to the 2006/2007 timeframe including the RECLAIM shave for the universe of Rule 317 facilities.

This conservative approach to establishing the programmatic Rule 317 baseline satisfies the criteria of the Harnett memo and is consistent with the aggregate approach for fee equivalency inherent in our rule.

7) What are the mechanisms that would ensure emissions data integrity and that

actual emissions do not exceed allowables?

There are several avenues through which emissions data integrity can and will be maintained for Rule 317 purposes. The Rule 317 universe consists of the largest facilities in the basin which are also Title V facilities. With very few exceptions, the vast majority of all NOx sources in the Rule 317 universe are also in the RECLAIM program which requires an annual reconciliation of actual emissions versus emission credit holdings to ensure that actual emissions do not exceed allowables. Both Title V and RECLAIM facilities are inspected annually to ensure emissions compliance. Further, the emissions data used for baseline and subsequent year emissions are obtained from information gathered by the Annual Emissions Reporting (AER) program, which is audited periodically for data accuracy purposes. The AER Program, developed consistent with the state law and embedded in SCAQMD Rule 301, requires facilities that exceed specific emissions thresholds to report their emissions from permitted and non-permitted equipment and processes annually. Facilities are also required to pay emission fees for total emissions exceeding any of the thresholds specified in Rule 301 for both criteria pollutants, 24 toxic air contaminants and ozone depleting compounds. All facilities subject to Rule 317 are obligated to report their emissions through the AER program and pay fees corresponding to their reported emissions. It should be noted that accuracy of the reported emissions through the AER program is critical for the SCAQMD because the emission fees collected pursuant to the reported emissions constitute one of the three most significant revenue sources for the agency. More importantly, however, SCAQMD largely relies on emissions data compiled through the AER program in developing its emissions inventories and control measures for its Air Quality Management Plan and its revisions, as well as developing new rules and amendments to existing rules to achieve air quality standards in the Basin. As stated above, periodic audits are used to ensure accuracy of data submitted. Please be aware that facilities are obligated to rectify any underreporting discovered through audits and pay penalties for the underreported portion of their emissions. Furthermore, please

# Ms. Lily Wong - 6 - December 21, 2011

also be aware that the reporting of actual emissions, through the AER program in excess of allowables would constitute facility admission, in writing, of violation of District rules and/or permit conditions that limit the facility emissions and would invite swift enforcement action against the facility that would include issuance of a Notice of Violation and imposition of severe monetary and other penalties. Therefore, we can confidently state that these measures, that are already in effect, provide adequate assurance that actu al emissions will not exceed allowable

emissions.

Based on the above analysis, we can assert that the baseline emissions values for the

Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 will be the lower of actuals or allowables. Our data integrity approach also addresses facilities that do not have emissions data for Fiscal Years 2005/2006 and 2006/2007 or that started operation subsequent to Calendar

Year 2007. For these facilities, their Baseline emissions will be their Calendar Year

2010 actuals, not to exceed allowables.

I hope you find our responses helpful. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact Dr. Laki Tisopulos, Assistant Deputy Executive Officer, at (909) 396-3123.

Sincerely,

Elaine Chang, DrPH Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources

cc: Kurt Karperos, CARB

Exhibit A - Qualified Programs and Estimated Actual Expenditures for 2010 and 2011 Pre-Funding the Section 172(e) Fee Equivalency Account

Exhibit B – Qualified Programs Providing On-Going Funding For Post-2011 to Section 172(e) Fee Equivalency Account

Exhibit C – AQMP references

Exhibit D – Rationale for the Alternative Baseline in Rule 317A- 1EXHIBIT A – QUALIFIED PROGRAMS AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL EXPENDITURES FOR 2010 AND 2011 PRE- FUNDING THE SECTION 172 (e) FEE EQUIVALENCYACCOUNTNameDate ofAwardExpenditureYearOne-time/OngoingActualExpenditureIn SOCABActualExpenditureIn SSABU.S. EPA DERASchool Bus Replacement 6/30/2010 2011 One-time$299,000 (US EPA)$8,650,734 (local)$40,740,000 (state)U.S. EPA DERA EarmarkLNG Truck Replacement11/6/2009 2010/2011 One-time$6,238,000 (US EPA)$10,675,000 (local)$15, 250,000 (state)Crane, Shore Power, Off Road 4/21/2010 2011/2012 One-time 0U.S. EPA Emerging TechnologiesTruck Retrofits/SCRT 4/28/2009 2010 One-time $691,260 (US EPA + local)Truck Retrofits-SCRT (ARRA) 8/31/2009 2011 One-time $1,325,094 (US EPA + local)Truck Retrofits-SCCRT (ARRA) 8/31/2009 2011 One-time $2,125,746 (US EPA + local)A- 2NameDate ofAwardExpenditureYearOne-time/OngoingActualExpenditureIn SOCABActualExpenditureIn SSABU.S. DOE Clean CitiesARRA-LNG Truck Replacement11/6/2009 2010 One-time$2,746,000 (DOE)$4,165,000 (local)$6,100,000 (state)New LNG Station Ontario, CA 3/12/2010 2010/2011 One-time 0UPS Ontario-Las Vegas LNG.... (ARRA) 12/18/2009 2010/2011 One-time 0AB2766Local Governments*FY 2009/2010 Ongoing $18,866,355 (local) $1,617,626 (local)MSRC*2010 Ongoing$11,515,865 (local)$225,000 (local)ARB AB118 ProgramHybrid Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project(HVIP)2010 One-time$1,500,000 (local)$9,200,000 (state)Clean Vehicle Rebate Program (CVRP) 2010 One-time 0Lawn Mower 2010 One-time $816,000 (local)A- 3NameDate ofAwardExpenditureYearOne-time/OngoingActualExpenditureIn SOCABActualExpenditureIn SSABCalifornia Energy Commission FundingLNG Truck Replacement 7/9/2010 2011 One-time $1,550,000 (local)NG Infrastructure: South Coast Air Basin 5/17/2010 2011 One-time 0SCAQMD Clean Fuels Program2010 Ongoing$7,835,424 (local)Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality StandardsAttainment Program20102011OngoingOngoingtbdGoods Movement Emission Reduction Program(Proposition 1B/2006)20102011OngoingOngoing$62,136,000$37,812,000*: Based on reported expenditures by local governments and MSRC that were spent in VOC/NOx emission reduction related projects.B- 1EXHIBIT B – QUALIFIED PROGRAMS PROVIDING ON-GOING FUNDING FOR POST-2010 TO SECTION 172(e) FEE EQUIVALENCY ACCOUNTNameDate ofAwardInitial Year *of ExpenditureEstimatedTimeframefor FullAchievementofReductionsReductionin Districtor AirshedExplanation ofbenefit to ozonereductionProject DescriptionOne-time/Ongoing*Grant *AwardU.S. EPA DERA EarmarkHeavy Duty Truck Replacement 9/25/2009 2008/2009 2009 - 2014 DistrictReplace 132 heavy-dutydiesel drayage trucksoperating in and aroundthe twin ports of LosAngeles and Long BeachCalifornia, with new LNGtrucks that are certified byCARB.One-time4,900,000Heavy Duty Truck Replacement 9/25/2009 2010/2011 2010 - 2016 DistrictReplace heavy-duty dieseldrayage trucks operatingin and around the twinports of Los Angeles andLong Beach California,with new LNG trucks thatare certified by CARB.One-time7,500,000U.S. DOE TransportationElectrificationB- 2NameDate ofAwardInitial Year *of ExpenditureEstimatedTimeframefor FullAchievementofReductionsReductionin Districtor AirshedExplanation ofbenefit to ozonereductionProject DescriptionOne-time/Ongoing*Grant *AwardPlug-in Hybrid Electric Medium.. (ARRA) 12/14/2009 2013 2013-2018122Vehicles inDistrict,RemainderNationwideR&D to demonstratehybrid systems inmedium-duty vehicles;estimate 30%reduction in NOx andVOCDevelop plug-in hybridtechnology for mediumduty vehicles, createproduction capability andestablish a supportingcharging infrastructure;includes demonstrationprogram of 378 vehiclesOne-time45,443,325U.S. DOE Clean CitiesNG Taxi Cabs & Shuttle Vans... 6/24/2010 201045 NaturalGas Taxicabsdeployed,34 NG vansto becompleted byearly 2011DistrictNatural gas passengervehicles and vans havelower nonmethanehydrocarbon and NOxemissions than theirgasoline counterparts.In addition, this sectorhas been replacingtaxicabs and vans witholder, higher pollutinggasoline vehicles.Deploy 45 NG taxi cabsand 34 NG shuttle vansfor operation at majorcommercial airportsserving SouthernCaliforniaOne-time500,000B- 3NameDate ofAwardInitial Year *of ExpenditureEstimatedTimeframefor FullAchievementofReductionsReductionin Districtor AirshedExplanation ofbenefit to ozonereductionProject DescriptionOne-time/Ongoing*Grant *AwardHeavy Duty NG Drayage Truck ...(ARRA)12/18/2009 2010/2011 2010- 2016 DistrictReplace HD dieseldrayage trucks operatingin and around the Ports ofLB and LA with LNGtechnology; provideoutreach and training onalternative fueltechnology.One-time9,408,389U.S. Department of TransportationDiesel Emissions Reduction in the SouthCoast AQMD (SAFTEA-LU)6/15/2010 2011 2011 - 2016 DistrictReplace diesel trucks withLNG trucksOne-time1,800,000CARB AQIP Funding**Lawnmower Exchange 2010 2010 - 2018 DistrictAQMD residents mayexchanging an old,operable gasolinepowered lawn mower andpurchase a new electriclawnmower.One-time800,000Hybrid VIP 2010/2011 Summer 2011 DistrictVoucher incentiveprogram to purchasehybrid trucks and buses.One-time1,500,000California Energy Commission FundingB- 4NameDate ofAwardInitial Year *of ExpenditureEstimatedTimeframefor FullAchievementofReductionsReductionin Districtor AirshedExplanation ofbenefit to ozonereductionProject DescriptionOne-time/Ongoing*Grant *AwardTransportation/ Electrification 9/2/2010 2013 2013-2018122Vehicles inDistrict,RemainderNationwideR&D to demonstratehybrid systems inmedium-duty vehicles;estimate 30%reduction in NOx andVOCDevelop plug-in hybridtechnology for mediumduty vehicles, createproduction capability andestablish a supportingcharging infrastructure;includes demonstrationprogram of 378 vehiclesOne-time5,000,000Ports Clean Truck FundingPort of Long Beach 3/24/2010 2010 2010 - 2015 DistrictReplace HD dieseldrayage trucks operatingin and around the Port ofLong Beach with LNGtechnology.One-time4,600,000Port of Los Angeles 3/5/2010 2010 2010 - 2015 DistrictReplace HD dieseldrayage trucks operatingin and around the Port ofLos Angeles with LNGtechnology.One-time10,200,000SCAQMD Clean Fuels ProgramElectric & Hybrids On-going 2010-2020 DistrictClean Fuels projectsincluding hybrid andelectric vehicleOn-going8,000,000Hydrogen & Fuel Cells On-going 2010-2020 DistrictB- 5NameDate ofAwardInitial Year *of ExpenditureEstimatedTimeframefor FullAchievementofReductionsReductionin Districtor AirshedExplanation ofbenefit to ozonereductionProject DescriptionOne-time/Ongoing*Grant *AwardEngine Technology On-going 2010-2020 District technologies,infrastructure anddeployment, hydrogeninfrastructure and mobilefuel cell technologies,emissions controltechnologies, enginetechnologies, andstationary clean fueltechnologies.Infrastructure & Deployment On-going 2010-2020 DistrictEmission Controls On-going 2010-2020 DistrictOn-goingStationary On-going 2010-2020 DistrictHealth Impacts On-going 2010-2020 DistrictEmission Studies On-going 2010-2020 DistrictTechnology Transfer On-going 2010-2020 DistrictAB2766Local GovernmentsPost2008/2009$14,000,000MSRC–2011 andbeyond$12,000,000Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality StandardsAttainment ProgramOn-going On-going On-goingGoods Movement Emission Reduction Program(Proposition 1B/2006)On-going On-going On-goingB- 6* The Section 172(e) equivalency account will only be credited with actual expenditures in 2010 and beyond, o the extent expenditures have not been accounted under programs listed inExhibit A.

# D- 1 

# EXHIBIT D

RATIONALE FOR THE ALTERNATIVE BASELINE IN

RULE 317

1) Is the Selection of FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07 Emissions Reasonable for

Establishing an Alternative Baseline?

2) Does the Ten Year AER Emissions Data of 2000-2010 Support an

Aggregate Baseline Adjustment?

3) Comparison of Alternative Baselines – Annualized Average of FY’s 2005-

2007 vs. Highest 2 Consecutive Years in the past Ten Years (2-in-10)

# D- 2 

# RATIONALE FOR THE ALTERNATIVE BASELINE IN RULE 317

1) Is the Selection of FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07 Emissions Reasonable for Establishing

an Alternative Baseline ?

To avoid establishing an emissions Baseline reflecting the economically depressed activity levels of 2010, staff has explored the alternative Baseline concept provided by the Harnettmemo, and specifically focused on alternative years that more closely reflect prerecessionary activity levels.

The following page duplicates Figure 6 of the February 2011 Rule 317 staff report and includes the data used to generate the graph. The graph demonstrates why FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07 were chosen as pre-recessionary years with higher aggregate fuel and solvent usage. The fuel and solvent usage information, which is a good surrogate for economic activity for stationary sources for a given year, is submitted to the District annually under the Annual Emissions Reporting (AER) Program by all major stationary sources and is used for this analysis. The AER Program, developed consistent with state law and embedded in SCAQMD Rule 301, requires facilities that exceed specific emissions thresholds to report their emissions from permitted and non-permitted equipment and processes annually. Facilities are also required to pay emission fees for total emissions exceeding any of the thresholds specified in Rule 301 for both criteria pollutants and 24 toxic air contaminants and ozone depleting compounds. All facilities subject to Rule 317 are obligated to report their emissions through the AER program and pay fees corresponding to their reported emissions. Also included are employment data for California and the four-county area that comprises the SCAQMD (Figure 3 and Figure 4 of the February 2011 Rule 317 Staff Report). Employment data clearly show the impact of the recession beginning in the second quarter of calendar year 2008.

Careful evaluation of the three figures reveals that selecting the average of the emissions reported for FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07 is reasonable for the purposes of establishing an alternative Baseline since it closely reflects pre-recessionary activity levels.

# D- 3 Figure 6 from February 2011 Rule 317 Staff Report

Raw Data for Figure 6

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009

R317-Gaseous Fuel (mmscf) 563,945 525,653 424,246 409,583 421,673 445,711 457,983 489,232 440,632

R317- Coating/Solvent (Mgal) 8,400 12,349 13,886 12,886 15,172 14,955 14,654 10,363 7,940



# Normalized Data for Figure 6

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009

R317-Gaseous

Fuel 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8

R317- Coating/Solvent 1 1.47 1.65 1.53 1.81 1.78 1.74 1.23 0.95 (Data source: SCAQMD AER data for years 2000-2010) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

2

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 

# Gaseous Fuel & Coating/Solvent Usage Trends

For PR317 Facilities

R317-Gaseous Fuel R317-Coating/Solvent R317-

R317-

# D- 4 Figure 3 from February 2011 Rule 317 Staff Report California Employment

Figure 4 from February 2011 Rule 317 Staff Report Four-county Employment 15.2 15.4 15.6 15.8

16 16.2 16.4 16.6 16.8

17 17.2JanͲ07AprͲ07JulͲ07OctͲ07JanͲ08AprͲ08JulͲ08OctͲ08JanͲ09AprͲ09JulͲ09OctͲ09JanͲ10AprͲ10JulͲ10OctͲ10 

# Millions

Source: http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/?pageid=164



# 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0JanͲ07MarͲ07MayͲ07JulͲ07SepͲ07NovͲ07JanͲ08MarͲ08MayͲ08JulͲ08SepͲ08NovͲ08JanͲ09MarͲ09MayͲ09JulͲ09SepͲ09NovͲ09JanͲ10MarͲ10MayͲ10JulͲ10SepͲ10



# Millions

Source: http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/?pageid=164

# D- 5 2) Does the Ten Year AER Emissions Data of 2000-2010 Support an Aggregate Baseline Adjustment ?

Section 185(b)(2) of the 1990 Amendment to the CAA requires that major stationary sources compute their Baseline as (emphasis added ):

BASELINE AMOUNT.—For purposes of this section, the baseline amount shall be computed, in accordance with such guidance as the Administrator may provide, as the lower of the amount of actual VOC emissions (‘‘actuals’’) or VOC emissions allowed under the permit applicable to the source (or, if no such permit has been issued for the attainment year, the amount of VOC emissions allowed under the applicable implementation plan (‘‘allowables’’)) during the attainment year. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Administrator may issue guidance authorizing the baseline amount to be determined in accordance with the lower of average actuals or average allowables, determined over a period of more than one calendar year. Such guidance may provide that such average calculation for a specific source may be used if that source’s emissions are irregular, cyclical, or otherwise vary significantly from year to

year

.

For sources with “cyclical, irregular or emissions that otherwise vary significantly from year to year” the following guidance on alternative methods of computing the Baseline was provided by the Administrator 1 

# :

“...sources may generally use the relevant source records for any 24-consequtive month period in the last 10 years (‘2-in-10’ concept) to calculate an average actual annual emissions rate (tons per year).”

Should sources in the SOCAB use their respective attainment year emissions to compute their Baselines? They would have do so, unless it could be shown that their annual emissions are “irregular, cyclical, or otherwise vary significantly from year to year.” There has been much discussion about how a source that has irregular, cyclical, or otherwise significantly varying emissions from year to year would be identified so that it might establish an alternative Baseline.

One approach is to identify what a source that does not have irregular, cyclical, or otherwise significantly varying emissions from year to year would look like based on annual emissions reporting. This can be done, since a sources emissions profile is either irregular, cyclical, or otherwise significantly varying from year to year or simply regular or unvarying from year to year. Such a hypothetical “regular” emissions source

1 

# US EPA memo: “Guidance on Establishing Emissions Baselines under Section 185 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for Severe and Extreme Ozone Non-attainment Areas that Fail to Attain the 1-hour Ozone NAAQS by their Attainment”, William T. Harnett, Director, dated March 21, 2008

# D- 6 would have the characteristic of a uniform annual emissions profile, as shown in Figure

A below:



# Figure A. Uniform Emissions Profile

Thus a source that has a uniform emissions profile is definitely not indicative of annual source emissions that are irregular, cyclical, or otherwise significantly varying emissions from year to year. By corollary, this implies that sources with an emissions profile deviating from a uniform emissions profile are irregular, cyclical, or otherwise have annual emissions that vary significantly from year to year.

The following test statistic (V) can be used to numerically confirm that a given emissions profile is either varying or un-varying:

V = Variation in Emissions (or Irregularity) = Range of Emissions

Median Emissions Value

The test statistic is straight forward, easy to calculate and intuitive. It uses the actual middle value (median) of the range of actual emissions values and measures this central tendency value against another easily calculated variable, the range, which takes in the span of actual emissions over the given ten year period. For the uniform emissions profile, V = 0, since the range of emissions (defined as the highest actual emissions value Annual Rule 317 Emissions (T )

Yea r

# D- 7 minus the lowest actual emissions value) will be equivalent to zero, regardless of the

median value.

For the current 2-in-10 analysis and determination of source emissions profiles in the SOCAB, 112 sources, were identified from the District’s AER records system, with a complete ten years worth of (NOx and VOC) emissions data. Since Rule 317, in accordance with EPA’s guidance 2



# , allows a major source to aggregate NOx and VOC emissions, for the purposes of this analysis annual NOx and VOC emissions for each source are aggregated and the resulting value is reported as a single figure in tons on an annual basis. For each of the 112 sources that are subject to this analysis, Figure B shows their annualized emissions for the most recent 10 year period, the median annualized emissions value, the range of the annualized emissions values and

the test statistic V.

For the purposes of this analysis Annual Emissions Report (AER) emissions data for the most recent ten year time span was used. Specifically emissions from the following AER years were

used: Fiscal Year (FY) 2000-2001 (from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001) FY 2001-2002 (from July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002) FY 2002-2003 (from July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003) FY 2003-2004 (from July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004) FY 2004-2005 (from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005) FY 2005-2006 (from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006) FY 2006-2007 (from July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007) Calendar Year (CY) 2008 (from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008) Calendar Year (CY) 2009 (from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009) Calendar Year (CY) 2010 (from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010)

This time span excludes the six month period from July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 since only six months of emissions data is available for this six-month transitional period, during which a switchover in tracking emissions from fiscal year (FY) to calendar year (CY) was implemented.

Note that for all sources the test statistic V is greater than zero indicating that none of the sources has a uniform distribution of annualized emissions for the given ten year period. Furthermore, both emissions data and results have been rounded to the nearest ton, the level of significance measure, as provided for in both the CAA and Administrator guidance. In addition, the CAA does not require a demonstration of irregular, cyclical, or otherwise significantly varying emissions profile from year to year beyond the attainment year. Only that this be demonstrated for the ten year span immediately preceding and/or including the attainment year. This has been shown to be so for the 112 sources in this analysis. Visually, Figure C is a histogram showing V values for all 112 sources blocked into 20% increments of V values. Note the obvious variability

2 

# US EPA memo: “Guidance on Developing Fee Programs Required by Clean Air Act Section 185 for the 1-hour Ozone NAAQS”, Attachment C, Point B, Stephen D. Page, Director, dated January 5, 2010)

# D- 8 of the sources. While most sources have a V value between 40 and 120%, some sources have V values exceeding 300%. This histogram shows very graphically the large amount of variability in Rule 317 source emissions over a span of 10 years.

Next, we will show that the average of the fixed FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07 is at least as conservative a Baseline, if not more, than the allowed 2-in-10 or any 2-in-P years (where P  2).D- 9Figure B. Data and Analysis Results for 112 Sources With a Complete 10 Years of Reported Emissions(Source Aggregated NOx and VOC emissions)Source FY00-01 FY01-02 FY02-03 FY03-04 FY04-05 FY05-06 FY06-07 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 median range V% (V x 100)S1 18 19 16 19 17 17 18 15 15 1417 5 29S2 30 28 25 32 32 33 30 35 33 3332 10 31S3 40 84 44 50 73 67 57 50 26 3050 58 116S4 294 388 134 131 133 99 93 90 67 84115 321 279S5 108 96 81 87 88 52 40 21 23 2167 87 131S6 143 189 204 205 214 230 229 202 153 157 20387 43S7 198 71 30 55 75 48 44 28 31 3546 170 370S8 463 481 367 279 163 183 172 135 78 75 178 406 229S9 192 116 98 116 84 77 91 98 97 7998 115 118S10 190 170 143 75 63 67 64 73 72 6573 127 175S11 34 33 30 27 29 26 21 22 33 29 29 13 45S12 53 74 56 84 83 76 60 47 33 36 58 51 88S13 59 77 61 58 65 58 71 60 33 30 60 47 79S14 109 57 62 60 48 35 42 42 38 4245 74 164S15 28 17 16 25 33 34 24 21 18 17 23 18 80S16 18 18 15 15 15 14 13 13 16 13 15 5 33S17 45 36 63 46 77 86 50 44 15 37 46 71 156S18 44 40 45 57 64 52 52 22 17 22 45 47 106S19 22 25 18 15 16 19 22 25 28 30 22 15 68S20 32 41 26 27 25 25 29 33 30 16 28 25 89S21 53 40 29 23 27 22 20 14 15 17 23 39 173S22 196 203 187 186 187 183 180 208 197 188 188 28 15S23 89 85 90 102 118 97 104 54 49 6090 69 77S24 41 19 30 29 40 25 25 14 13 15 25 28 112S25 45 44 45 51 45 42 38 40 45 46 45 13 29S26 37 48 65 62 55 49 53 40 41 44 49 28 58S27 101 96 122 120 123 103 71 88 32 4799 91 92S28 43 40 41 37 48 47 46 41 40 34 41 14 34S29 50 32 75 35 37 39 40 30 35 33 36 45 125S30 29 22 18 19 23 25 27 29 26 26 26 11 43S31 116 138 147 102 104 105 130 109 117 124 117 45 39S32 34 21 21 25 26 17 20 25 20 20 21 17 81S33 120 128 110 126 135 113 106 86 79 88112 56 50D- 10Source FY00-01 FY01-02 FY02-03 FY03-04 FY04-05 FY05-06 FY06-07 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 median range V% (V x 100)S34 29 39 37 52 35 25 21 18 16 14 27 38 141S35 119 118 115 114 102 98 85 106 111 120113 35 31S36 49 47 54 65 55 68 63 67 51 51 55 21 39S37 28 27 25 18 26 30 27 21 19 21 26 12 47S38 26 15 15 15 26 23 23 20 15 22 21 11 52S39 44 39 33 30 26 24 25 22 20 21 26 24 94S40 339 328 330 297 319 325 339 270 346 348 329 78 24S41 13 21 19 20 19 15 16 17 16 16 17 8 48S42 259 199 178 189 151 185 165 147 115 186 182 144 79S43 38 36 31 35 36 31 14 14 14 19 31 24 77S44 31 20 22 17 19 27 28 30 32 32 28 15 55S45 21 25 30 48 42 46 52 51 40 55 44 34 77S46 19 15 27 31 39 51 56 36 33 43 35 41 119S47 76 66 54 61 38 41 41 37 40 43 42 39 93S48 102 139 125 112 128 126 122 141 122 100 124 41 33S49 22 16 31 32 43 43 44 39 34 42 37 28 77S50 16 22 19 17 23 32 33 42 50 50 28 34 124S51 92 102 90 92 111 92 87 108 70 8492 41 45S52 23 34 29 27 26 29 36 30 20 12 28 24 86S53 115 109 112 111 103 100 102 108 106 115 109 15 14S54 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 1 9S55 68 66 60 55 66 56 49 54 77 64 62 28 45S56 22 20 15 15 25 43 19 23 19 19 20 28 144S57 13 20 16 17 18 21 26 21 21 18 19 13 68S58 48 32 23 31 16 20 29 27 19 22 25 32 128S59 50 31 19 18 17 15 16 15 15 16 17 35 212S60 63 40 41 32 31 25 17 15 12 12 28 51 182S61 42 46 51 47 36 28 33 18 23 25 35 33 96S62 26 24 31 25 29 28 26 29 27 30 28 7 25S63 52 47 52 54 52 45 47 47 45 38 47 16 34S64 1,308 404 124 20 22 43 29 42 26 1336 1,295 3,648S65 901 100 66 74 63 47 40 55 43 3859 863 1,463S66 1,708 608 288 153 119 71 54 108 73 43114 1,665 1,467S67 639 295 57 42 40 41 50 20 39 1442 625 1,506D- 11Source FY00-01 FY01-02 FY02-03 FY03-04 FY04-05 FY05-06 FY06-07 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 median range V% (V x 100)S68 850 197 124 49 36 53 26 36 39 1844 832 1,891S69 111 60 44 29 27 27 22 20 18 1727 94 348S70 19 18 20 22 22 21 20 17 21 18 20 5 25S71 116 40 54 58 128 101 83 124 97 9194 88 94S72 26 43 44 25 17 17 17 14 16 15 17 30 176S73 104 115 153 149 138 138 154 149 142 134 140 50 36S74 46 49 55 54 54 62 47 40 15 21 48 47 98S75 82 47 65 43 42 27 24 26 28 22 35 60 171S76 22 23 18 17 24 24 24 24 24 14 24 10 43S77 57 55 66 68 53 54 59 51 88 33 56 55 98S78 21 48 48 34 55 47 41 39 28 24 40 34 85S79 441 374 442 390 405 375 471 362 373 386 388 109 28S80 2,167 1,897 1,860 2,047 1,8631,638 1,486 1,479 1,210 1,190 1,749 97756S81 74 56 62 56 46 38 29 29 31 26 42 48 114S82 26 28 35 46 45 42 43 24 25 33 34 22 65S83 89 79 178 160 128 113 92 91 75 9092 103 113S84 728 234 335 217 176 133 124 160 155 146 168 604 360S85 651 176 111 145 78 69 76 80 92 8790 582 650S86 29 30 31 26 29 34 36 54 49 37 33 28 86S87 1,369 1,244 1,468 1,424 1,4881,446 1,402 1,388 1,322 1,366 1,395 24417S88 22 21 27 28 27 24 27 23 16 21 24 12 51S89 286 258 221 265 279 216 292 297 252 252 262 81 31S90 91 92 57 92 48 26 31 42 18 24 45 74 164S91 27 38 37 37 38 44 66 56 59 58 41 39 95S92 253 192 224 183 217 233 245 192 182 162 205 91 44S93 51 57 54 55 47 57 42 24 26 30 49 33 67S94 108 30 22 73 84 81 87 85 75 5178 86 110S95 41 137 29 63 109 64 42 21 58 3650 116 232S96 49 49 22 21 24 26 27 25 27 42 27 28 106S97 37 55 43 39 50 50 48 47 49 44 48 18 38S98 89 119 126 107 129 118 113 105 109 117 115 40 35S99 160 204 242 177 139 165 133 146 177 183 171 109 64S100 115 114 125 124 128 133 141 138 139 144 131 30 23S101 50 56 59 79 84 81 90 52 5730 58 60 103D- 12Source FY00-01 FY01-02 FY02-03 FY03-04 FY04-05 FY05-06 FY06-07 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 median range V% (V x 100)S102 15 14 14 15 14 18 17 19 1818 16 5 31S103 18 18 13 16 13 15 15 14 1313 15 5 34S104 22 23 21 18 16 15 16 15 1717 17 8 47S105 27 17 15 14 15 12 15 14 1616 15 15 100S106 400 247 62 54 56 58 47 50 49 5055 353 642S107 13 70 72 77 62 48 57 54 4443 56 64 115S108 81 65 76 55 52 55 52 53 5651 55 30 55S109 594 529 505 547 496 519 465 441 451 431 501 163 33S110 964 852 890 918 825 886 914 968 895 799 893 169 19S111 52 22 24 24 25 22 23 21 2325 24 31 132S112 158 162 128 126 132 133 143 149 126 129 133 36 27D- 13523171017107261 1201010051015202520% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% 220% 240% 260% 280% 300% >300%NumberofSourcesV(%)=SourceEmissionsVariation=(EmissionsRange2000Ͳ2010/EmissionsMedian2000Ͳ2010)x100FigureC.Rule317MajorSourcesEmissionsVariation2000Ͳ2010(112Sources)

# D- 14 3) Comparison of Alternative Baselines – Annualized Average of FY’s 2005-2007 vs. Highest 2 Consecutive Years in the past Ten Years (2-in-10)

Rule 317 implements Section 185 of the Clean Air Act by using an alternative Baseline consisting of the annualized average of a source’s FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07

emissions. Under an alternative definition, the Harnett memo Baseline can consist of the average of any two consecutive years in the last ten years (2-in-10).

It can be shown, with mathematical certainty, that any alternative Baseline that allows a source to choose the two consecutive years over which Baseline emissions are averaged will always result in a higher Baseline and a lower Rule 317 source fee obligation in contrast to an annualized Baseline where the two consecutive years over which emissions are averaged is fixed.

Given that, f is the annualized average of a given source’s emissions , and X represents the annual emissions of the source in a given fiscal (or calendar) year, and Y represents the annual emissions of the source in the next immediately consecutive fiscal (or calendar) year, and

X i 

# represents the annual emissions of the source in a given fixed fiscal (or calendar) year,

and

Y i 

# represents the annual emissions of the source in the next immediately consecutive fiscal (or calendar) year following X i



# .

Then, f(X i 

# ,Y i 

# )  f(X,Y) , where X, Y, X i 

# and Y i 

# are all from the same set of years

This result holds in all cases since a source, given the option, can always choose an emissions Baseline annualized over the two highest consecutive emissions years. In which case these two years will exceed the emissions Baseline of any given alternative two fixed years or they will be the same as the two fixed years. In no case will the annualized emissions averages for a fixed two year annualized emissions average exceed a “2-in-P years” annualized emissions average. Consequently a source will always incur a higher or same Rule 317 source fee obligation with a fixed two year annualized emissions average.

The comparative analysis below uses actual emissions information form 112 facilities/sources subject to Rule 317 to demonstrate the point. For the purposes of this comparative analysis an emissions data set that spans the ten year time period from July 1, 2000 through December 31, 2010, was used. For the spanning set of years in this analysis (from FY 2000-01 thorough CY 2010) the following nine possible discrete two year consecutive pairs (and consequently 2 year averaged emission pairs) exist: FY

2000-01/2001-02, FY 2001-02/2002-03, FY 2002-03/2003-04, FY 2003-04/2004-05, FY

2004-05/2005-06, FY 2005-06/2006-07, FY 2006-07/CY 2008, CY 2008/09 and CY 2009/10. Therefore, over a ten year span, nine two-year consecutive averages are available for a facility to select as an alternative 2-in-10 Baseline as compared to the fixed Baseline (average of FY 2005-06/2006-07) as currently defined in Rule 317. For this10-year span, there were 112 sources, that had emissions of either NOx or VOC, or

# D- 15 both that were 10 tons or more in at least one of the years and in addition had emissions in all the span years. As such this data set is most representative for a 2-in-10 Baseline analysis.

Figure D below summarizes the resulting emissions in tons/year for both the Rule 317 Baseline (R) and the alternative highest 2-in-10 Baseline (H). H is calculated by assuming that for the 2-in-10 Baseline a source, given the option, will pick the years yielding the highest averaged emissions value and therefore resulting in the lowest annual Rule 317 fee liability for all future assessment years. The row (H-R) shows the additional increase in the aggregate Baseline (and therefore a reduced fee obligation) for sources where the alternative Baseline (H) is used instead of the current rule defined Baseline (R).

This demonstrates that use of the alternative highest 2-in-10 Baseline (H) compared to

the fixed 2-in-10 of Rule 317, would in all cases result in either no difference in the source’s Rule 317 fee obligation or that it would increase the subject sources emissions and therefore decrease the emissions fee obligation. Therefore the use of the fixed Baseline (R), included in Rule 317, is a more conservative approach to establishing a Baseline, since it results in an equivalent or lower aggregate emissions Baseline and therefore a higher Rule 317 emissions fee obligation.



# Figure D. Summary of Alternative Baseline Comparison

Annualized Baseline Alternative Aggregate

Emissions (Tons)

R

= Average of 2005-06 and 2006-07 emissions (Current Rule 317 Baseline) 11,481

H = Highest Consecutive 2 Years in Last 10 Years 18,562

H-R = (Additional increase in Baseline emissions, resulting in a reduction of Rule 317 fee obligation) 7,081

Figure E shows all possible 2-in-10 baseline combinations (aggregate emissions averaged over all two consecutive year combinations) as compared to the highest 2-in-10 baseline alternative. The last column shows the difference in emissions when a source can choose the Baseline years over which to average in contrast to a fixed 2-in10 baseline. In all cases, for the 10-year span (2000-2010) considered in this analysis, it can be seen that the use of the highest 2-in-10 baseline

# D- 16 always results in increased baseline emissions compared to a fixed 2-in-10 baseline and correspondingly in reduced fee obligation.



# Figure E – Effect of Alternative Averaged Consecutive Fixed Baseline Years

2 Consecutive Years Averaged Fixed Baseline (tons) Highest 2-in-10 (tons) Increased Baseline (tons)

FY00-01/01-02 17,314 18,562 1,248

FY01-02/02-03 13,728 18,562 4,834

FY02-03/03-04 12,843 18,562 5,719

FY03-04/04-05 12,431 18,562 6,131

FY04-05/05-06 11,932 18,562 6,630

FY05-06/06-07 11,481 18,562 7,081

FY06-07/CY08 11,128 18,562 7,434

CY08/CY09 10,500 18,562 8,062

CY09/CY10 10,001 18,562 8,561



# Per your request, staff is including Figure F, which reflects a larger set of facility universe (234 facilities subject to Rule 317) that is comprised of all facilities that reported actual emission greater than ten tons per year of either VOC or NOx for calendar year 2010, regardless whether they have a complete VOC and/or NOx emissions profile for the prior 10 years. Similar to Figure E, VOC and NOx emissions for each facility for the 10-year span are displayed in Figure F in an aggregate form. This data set of 234 facilities corroborates the year to year variability in emissions observed with the smaller facility universe that the variability analysis above was

based on.

The data for Figures B and F are from facilities that have actual emissions greater than 10 tons per year in CY 2010. The data is presented to highlight the variability in the emissions, and not to depict the actual universe of facilities subject to Rule 317. Staff estimates there are approximately 400 facilities in the Rule 317 universe.D- 17Figure F. Aggregate NOx and VOC Emissions Data (2000-2010) For All Sources with Actual Emissions > 10Tons (VOC or NOx) in CY2010Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F1 12.7 - 12.8 15.9 15.8 13.6 - - - 11.4F2 13.9 14.6 15.3 17.5 16.5 17.3 19.1 16.4 18.6 17.8F3 33.4 32.6 34.9 30.1 33.4 32.3 31.7 25 28.4 29.9F4 12.3 10.7 11.4 - 10.2 - - - - -F5 11.9 - - 21.4 19.1 16.3 22.3 20.7 21.3 22.6F6 15.5 15 15.1 15.1 -- - - - -F7 30 25.7 49.6 57.3 67 72.7 50 44.2 83.9 40F8 11.2 - - - - - - -- 10.6F9 84.2 67.4 90 92.9 99.4 133.2 130.6 134.1 388.2 294.2F10 48.2 27.3 33.9 - - - - - --F11 20.7 22.9 21 39.7 52.2 88.2 87.2 81 96.5 108.1F12 156.9 152.8 201.7 228.7 229.7 214.2 205.3 203.5 189.5 142.8F13 35 30.9 27.7 44.2 48.2 74.9 55.3 30.1 70.9 197.9F14 74.5 78.5 134.6 171.8 183 163.3 279.4 366.9 481.5 463.3F15 11 20.3 38.3 34.8 47.141.7 41.7 - - -F16 78.8 97 97.9 91.1 77.3 84.5 115.7 98 115.9 191.7F17 12.9 - - - - - - -- 14.9F18 14.9 14.7 14.5 - - 16.2 16.5 - - -F19 64.6 71.5 72.7 64.1 66.8 62.9 74.8 143.2 170.3 190.3F20 28.6 32.7 22.1 21 26.2 29.1 26.9 30.3 32.9 33.7F21 36.3 32.7 47.4 60 75.9 82.8 84.1 55.7 74.4 52.5F22 29.9 33.5 59.7 70.8 57.9 64.7 58.3 61.1 77.2 58.6F23 42.3 37.7 41.7 41.6 34.8 48.4 60.1 61.7 56.7 108.8F24 17.4 18.4 21 24.4 34.1 33.5 25 15.7 17.1 27.9D- 18Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F25 13.4 15.9 13.1 13.5 14 14.8 14.6 15.3 17.6 17.8F26 16.7 - 13.1 13.1 - - - - 14.3 11.9F27 36.7 15.3 44 49.7 85.5 76.9 46.3 62.7 36 44.6F28 12.3 - - - - - - 13.6 --F29 16.8 -14.7 18.1 20.9 20.219.4 19.1 18.5 36.8F30 20.9 43.7 34.1 - - - - - --F31 11.1 -16.6 22.7 24.2 21.618.8 23.6 28.9 40.8F32 22 16.7 22 52.2 52.4 63.8 56.7 45.1 39.6 44.4F33 16.1 -13.7 17 18 23.319.8 22.7 18.6 36.2F34 33.1 - - - - - - -- -F35 29.7 25.6 29.2 22 - 19.8 30.5 - - -F36 30.5 28.2 25 21.5 19.2 16.4 14.7 18.3 24.9 22.2F37 17.4 14.3 - 17.4 21.2 21.9 32.5 28.6 - -F38 11.7 -10.9 13.5 17.6 17.416.8 14.4 13.8 15.4F39 15.9 30.4 32.7 29.4 24.7 24.8 27.4 25.5 41 32F40 17.5 15.2 13.5 19.5 22.5 27.1 23.1 28.6 39.7 53.4F41 188 197.3 208.2 180.4 183.5 186.7 186.1 186.5 202.6 195.9F42 34.3 35.1 28.9 36.817 16.9 16.4 22.9 11.6 -F43 59.7 49.1 53.5 104 97.4 117.7 102 89.8 85.3 89.2F44 14.8 13.4 14.3 24.9 25.3 40.3 28.7 30 18.9 41.1F45 45.6 44.9 40.3 38 41.9 44.7 51.2 44.6 43.7 44.8F46 44 41.4 40.4 53.5 48.5 55 61.6 64.6 48.4 37.5F47 47.3 32.2 88.1 71.5 103.5 122.8 119.7 122.4 96.3 101.4F48 57 63.4 71.1 89.9 87.4 111 95.2 91.5 - -F49 34.1 40.3 41.5 45.7 47.1 48.1 37.5 41.3 40 42.8F50 32.8 34.7 30.4 40.3 39.3 37.2 34.6 75.2 32.3 49.8F51 26.1 26.2 28.5 27.1 25 22.7 18.6 17.8 22.3 28.8D- 19Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F52 123.8 117 108.7 130.2 105.2 104 101.6 146.9 137.5 116.2F53 20.4 20 24.8 20.4 16.9 25.8 24.9 20.5 21.2 34.1F54 87.6 78.9 86.2 106.3 113.4 135.3 125.6 110.2 127.6 120.5F55 14.3 16.4 17.5 21.5 25.3 34.7 51.6 37.3 39.2 29.5F56 13.1 - - - - - - -- -F57 120.4 111.3 106.2 85.2 97.8 101.9 114 115.5 118.1 119.2F58 50.5 51.2 66.8 63.5 67.8 54.8 65.4 53.6 46.6 49.2F59 11.6 11.9 12.1 12.3 13.1 11.4 - 11.1 - -F60 15.9 29.1 13.3 16.5 - - - - 29.6 14.8F61 15.7 15.1 13.4 15.416.7 15.8 14.2 12.1 - 12F62 20.8 19.4 20.6 27.1 29.5 26.1 18.3 25.3 26.8 28.3F63 21.6 14.5 20.4 22.9 23.4 26 14.9 15.5 14.7 26.1F64 20.8 19.7 22 25.1 24 25.5 30.1 33 39.3 43.6F65 348.3 345.6 269.5 338.9 325.3 318.6 296.9 329.6 327.8 338.7F66 15.9 16.3 16.6 15.9 15.3 18.8 20 18.7 20.7 12.8F67 11.8 13.4- 20.4 15.1 16.121.8 20 27 24.9F68 186 114.8 147.3 164.9 185.4 150.8 189.5 177.9 198.8 258.6F69 13 13.4 13 13.9 - - 12.7 14 14.9 13.5F70 18.7 13.6 13.8 13.6 30.5 36.4 34.9 31.3 35.9 37.9F71 32 31.9 30.5 28.4 27.1 18.9 17.2 21.9 19.9 31.2F72 54.8 40 51.1 51.6 45.9 41.8 48.4 29.8 25.4 20.9F73 43 32.6 35.6 56.1 50.9 39.5 30.6 26.5 14.6 19.1F74 42.9 39.9 36.7 40.8 40.7 38.4 60.5 54 65.8 75.8F75 99.9 121.7 141.1 121.8 126.4 128 111.8 125.1 138.8 102.5F76 12.7 12.9 15.5 - 12.3 18.1 17.7 - - 21F77 42 33.7 38.7 44.3 42.6 42.8 31.8 31.1 16.3 21.9F78 14.7 15.6 19 20.7 16.9 16.9 17.2 12.1 11.2 -D- 20Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F79 19.4 - - - - - - -- -F80 88 122.8 58.3 - - - - - --F81 49.7 50.1 42.1 33.1 31.9 22.5 17.3 18.8 22.3 15.6F82 84 69.9 108.2 86.9 91.7 110.9 92.3 89.9 102 91.6F83 19.6 19.6 19.6 19.512.8 19.8 19.9 21.2 26.5 -F84 19.2 - - 15.6 - 14.5 - - --F85 59.4 52.4 49.8 45.623.5 23.5 16.8 19.3 17.4 -F86 12.5 19.5 30.3 35.6 28.6 26.2 27.3 29.2 33.9 22.6F87 18.9 19.8 17.4 22.9 23.6 44.4 79.3 47.3 - -F88 15.7 -12.6 16.8 17.2 16.220.5 19.2 20.9 15.9F89 115.2 105.9 108.5 102 99.6 102.7 110.6 112.5 109.2 114.6F90 10.5 10.7 11.2 11.1 11.1 10.9 10.8 11.3 11.2 11.2F91 206 205.1 208 207.1 195.3 196.6 - - - -F92 64 77.3 53.8 49.4 56.1 65.9 55.4 60.5 65.7 67.7F93 18.7 18.6 22.7 18.9 42.9 25.2 15 15 20.2 22.2F94 17.5 20.6 21.2 26 20.9 18 16.9 15.8 19.8 13.1F95 12.6 - - 12 13.1 13.5 16.3 18.8 18 16.3F96 22.3 19.3 27.1 29 20.2 15.5 31 22.7 32 48.1F97 43.2 38.4 35.7 32 34.4 39.8 33 28.2 44.8 -F98 26.7 19.2 26.4 31.229.4 23.1 23.5 21.1 24.9 -F99 47.3 56.4 49.9 46.6 47.4 65.1 -- - -F100 10.6 - 12.1 10.8 13.3 13 - - - -F101 13.2 14.2 15.4 11.1 10.8 13.3 -- - -F102 12.9 11.3 - 12 11.6 12.5 47.6 47.8 33.8 31.6F103 15.7 15.3 14.6 16.5 14.8 17.4 17.9 19.1 30.8 49.9F104 12.4 11.8 15.1 17.1 24.6 31.1 31.6 41.2 40.4 62.5F105 10.1 - - - - - 50.4 83.9 104.7 133.5D- 21Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F106 11.2 - - - 14 24.5 - 12.5 - -F107 24.9 22.6 18.2 33.1 28 35.7 47.4 51.3 46.3 42.5F108 27.6 20 29.3 32.2 30.3 - 15.1 - - -F109 22.3 33.6 32 42.8 29 45 - 65.2 60.1 50.8F110 29.8 26.8 28.5 25.7 27.9 28.6 24.6 30.7 24 26.1F111 37.5 44.7 47.4 47.4 45 51.7 54.1 51.7 47 52.3F112 13.3 26.4 41.7 29 42.8 22.5 20 124.2 403.7 1,308.00F113 38.4 43.2 54.6 40 47.4 62.8 74.3 66 99.8 900.8F114 42.7 73.4 107.7 53.8 70.7 118.5 153.3 287.6 608.4 1,707.90F115 14.5 38.6 19.8 50.3 40.7 39.8 41.6 57 295 638.6F116 18.2 39.2 36.4 25.9 52.6 35.9 48.7 124.2 197.4 849.7F117 17.1 18 20.1 22.4 27.4 26.6 29.4 43.6 60.1 111.3F118 12.8 14 15.4- - - 25.8 23.5 11.3 -F119 11.1 11.6 11.1 - - - 15.2 14.4 - -F120 18.5 20.6 17.1 20 20.8 21.9 22.1 20.2 18 19.1F121 42.2 31.4 39.7 22.6 24 - -- - -F122 91.2 96.8 123.9 83.4 100.5 127.8 58.3 54.3 40.3 116.2F123 13.1 14.313.4 21.1 20.9 15.3 15 21.1- 18.7F124 15.4 15.7 14.4 17.3 17.2 16.7 25.1 43.6 43.2 26.1F125 16.8 17 16.218.9 - 24.6 24.4 27.3 34.1 -F126 10.6 25.7 26.9 28.3 21.2 12 -- - -F127 15.1 - - 17.1 15.1 15.1 14.5 - - 13.6F128 134.3 142.1 149.1 154.3 137.6 137.8 149 153.5 114.9 103.7F129 21.2 15.4 40.4 47.5 61.8 53.7 54.4 54.7 48.9 46.2F130 161.6 154.7 175.5 177.1 109.4- - - - 87.3F131 21.6 27.5 25.5 24.5 26.9 41.9 42.9 65 47.4 82.1F132 14.4 24.4 24.1 24.4 24.1 23.8 17 17.8 22.8 21.7D- 22Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F133 17.6 18.1 14.7 16.2 17.9 18.9 19.2 - - -F134 33.2 88 51.2 59.5 54.1 52.8 68.3 66.2 55.1 56.8F135 24.2 27.8 38.9 41.5 47.1 55.4 33.8 47.5 47.6 20.8F136 15.1 - - - - - - -- 14F137 30.1 29.1 27.2 33.9 32.3 - 30- - -F138 10.8 - 14.6 11.1 - 129.8 - - - -F139 46.5 45.3 45.3 43.8 35.3 - -- - -F140 34.9 36.1 35.3 34.2 30.1 23.1 26.9 29.5 - -F141 17 15 11.8 - - - 17.3 - - -F142 13.1 16.1 - - - - 14.1 - --F143 99.8 48.3 31.8 -- - - - --F144 1,130.10 1,195.90 1,224.90 1,166.80 1,285.30 1,637.30 1,212.10 1,135.40 1,242.90 -F145 214.1 189.9 188.7 215 285.9 319.9 307 311.9 - -F146 10.5 10.3 10.7 -- - - - --F147 14.4 16.2 17.9 32.1 20.6 - 14.6 - - -F148 16.4 19.8 24 20.8 21.9 - 18.3 34.8 - -F149 13 11.7 11.7 23 22.9 23 23.1 11 - -F150 44.9 32.5 - - - - - - --F151 21.5 19.1 23.4 27.5 40.9 22.8 19.8 - - -F152 28.4 31 28.9 36.6 24.3 37.8 -- - -F153 28.7 28 32.1 -- - - - --F154 23.8 24.5 24.8 14.4 -- - - - -F155 44.6 33.5 - - - - - - --F156 10.8 10.2 10.2 10.2 -- - - - -F157 10.1 10.5 10.5 11.1 11.4 - -- - -F158 26.2 23.9 36.6 54.9 58.4 - -- - -F159 15.8 10.8 15 15 18.2 - -- - -D- 23Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F160 12.8 15.2 14.3 14.1 13.6 - -- - -F161 19.8 19.9 16.3 17.4 -- - - - -F162 16.2 16.2 16.2 15.7 14 - -- - -F163 15.2 20.2 25.1 25.6 25.8 - -- - -F164 10.3 11.4 13.8 17.2 17.3 - -- - -F165 12.9 12.9 12.1 -- - - - --F166 15.5 13.7 13.7 13.3 -- - - - -F167 35 37.2 24.7 -- - - - --F168 21.6 13.7 14.3 16.2 -- - - - -F169 15.8 17.8 - - - - - - --F170 202.4 192.1 201.5 189.5 - - - - - -F171 88.9 92.6 104.5 120.4 -- - - - -F172 69.7 68.4 88.7 106.9 -- - - - -F173 27.2 26.8 23.2 -- - - - --F174 16 32.7 12.8 -- - - - --F175 19.1 24.5 35.3 -- - - - --F176 13.2 - - - - - - -- -F177 11.4 32.3 46.1 -- - - - --F178 24.5 28.3 - - - - - - --F179 123 118.4 134.6 - - - - - --F180 18 15.9 21.1 -- - - - --F181 19.9 - - - - - - -- -F182 11.2 - - - - - - -- -F183 18.9 20.2 17.5 19.3 21.5 15.4 20.7 23.9 28.6-F184 385.7 373.4 361.7 470.6 375.1 404.7 390.2 441.7 374.5 441.2F185 1,189.90 1,209.70 1,478.80 1,485.80 1,637.60 1,862.50 2,046.80 1,859.90 1,897.40 2,167.40F186 17.2 14.9 - - - - - - -13.2D- 24Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F187 25.9 31 29.2 28.5 37.8 45.8 56 61.8 56.5 73.7F188 18.7 19 16.4 18.8 16.8 16.3 -- - -F189 33.5 24.9 23.6 43 41.9 45.4 46.3 34.7 28.4 26.2F190 90.2 74.8 90.7 91.8 112.7 128.2 159.9 178.2 79 88.7F191 145.6 155.1 160 123.8 133 176.4 217.5 335.4 234.1 728.1F192 87 91.8 79.6 76.1 68.9 78 144.9 110.5 175.9 651.2F193 37.3 48.6 54.3 36 33.7 29.3 25.7 30.8 29.7 29.1F194 1,365.90 1,321.50 1,387.80 1,401.70 1,446.10 1,488.30 1,424.20 1,468.30 1,244.00 1,368.70F195 15.2 16 14.1 12.2 - 13.4 15.7 19.4 12.1 14F196 21.2 16.4 23 26.6 24 27.3 28 27.1 21.4 22F197 251.8 251.6 296.7 291.7 216.3 279.4 264.8 221.5 258.1 286F198 89.4 97.5 91.8 102.2 82.9 80.2 -- - -F199 17.5 17.318.2 -- 28.3 27.1 44.3 39.4 110.9F200 24.2 18.4 42.4 30.5 26.1 47.8 91.8 56.5 92.2 91.4F201 57.9 59.2 56.1 66.5 43.9 38.3 37.1 37 37.5 27.1F202 161.9 182 191.9 245.2 233.1 216.7 183 223.6 191.8 252.7F203 30.4 25.6 24.3 41.7 56.7 47 55.5 54.2 56.8 51.4F204 51.3 75.2 85 87.2 80.5 83.7 72.6 22 30.1 107.8F205 35.8 57.9 20.7 42.2 64.4 109.4 63.1 28.9 137.1 40.9F206 20.7 26.422.9 22.1 21.9 18.4- 15.9 23.7 30.1F207 42.3 26.6 24.9 27.4 25.6 24 20.8 21.8 48.7 48.7F208 43.9 49.5 46.9 47.6 49.7 49.8 38.9 42.7 54.8 37.4F209 117.4 108.8 105.2 113.3 117.7 129.1 106.8 126.5 119 88.7F210 183.2 176.5 145.7 132.9 165 138.6 176.9 241.6 203.5 160.2F211 144.2 138.9 138.1 141.3 132.9 128 123.9 124.8 113.8 114.7F212 29.9 57 51.8 89.9 81.2 83.6 79.3 59.2 56 49.9F213 18.4 18.4 19 17.1 17.6 14.2 15.2 14.4 14.1 15D- 25Facility CY2010 CY2009 CY2008FY06-07 FY05-06 FY04-05 FY03-04 FY02-03 FY01-02 FY00-01F214 13.2 13 14 15.4 14.8 13.4 15.9 13.3 18.3 17.6F215 14.6 14.4 14.5 17.2 28.1 44.4 51.2 - 16.8 -F216 51.5 52.849.7 41.5 40.3 37 46.8 53.4 50.3-F217 14.2 14.217 17.6 18.7 17.6 19.1 21.6 12.7-F218 17.2 16.6 15 15.9 15.4 16.5 18.5 21 22.7 21.7F219 16.1 15.8 13.7 15.3 12.3 14.9 14.5 14.8 17.4 26.7F220 18.3 13.5 - 16 14.2 - - - 27.1 45.5F221 49.8 48.9 50 46.8 57.7 56.5 54.3 62.4 246.9 400.5F222 43.2 43.9 53.8 57.4 48.3 62.3 76.9 72.5 70.5 12.8F223 50.8 56.1 53.5 52.1 55.3 52.5 54.5 75.9 65.2 81.4F224 431.3 451.4 441.2 465.1 518.9 496.1 546.5 505 528.8 594.5F225 798.9 894.7 968.4 913.7 886 825 918 889.7 851.9 964.2F226 25.2 23.4 21.4 23.2 21.7 24.8 23.9 23.6 21.9 51.9F227 11.4 11.311.4 - - - 25.4 25.5 11.5 14.8F228 129.3 125.7 149.2 143.3 132.7 131.7 126.1 128.5 161.9 158.1F229 36.2 35.5 38.8 - - - 16.5 - - 40.1F230 20.7 -27.6 33.9 31.9 31.644.5 46.2 41 46.1F231 14 21.4 19.8 20 20.2 19.3 19.3 19.8 19 -F232 14.5 - 22.3 - 19.2 - - - --F233 11.6 - 12.6 - 16.8 19.5 14.6 - - -F234 924.9 919.6 1,095.60 1,076.00 - -- - --- = no reported emissions