alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the periods                indicated. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 11, 2008 | /s/                Edward Yihua Kang         |   |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   | Edward                Yihua Kang             |   |
|                                   | Chief                Executive Officer       |   |
|                                   | (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is entered
into on April 26, 2005 by and between Insight Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Company"), and Karen K. McGinnis ("Executive"), to be effective as
of January 1, 2005 (the "Effective Date").

                                    RECITALS

      A. Executive is currently employed by Company in the position of Senior
Vice President - Finance, and Executive and Company are parties to an Employment
Agreement that was effective as of October 15, 2004 (as amended, the "Original
Agreement").

      B. Company desires to change the basis for incentive compensation under
the Original Agreement and Executive desires to accept such changes.

      NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

      1. DEFINED TERMS. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have
the meanings given them in the Original Agreement.

      2. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION. Section 3(b) of the Original Agreement is
hereby amended, as of the Effective Date, by deleting the text of such
subsection in its entirety and inserting the following in its place:

            Employee shall be eligible for an incentive bonus to be detailed in
            one or more separate written documents, to be delivered by the
            Company from time to time (each, an "Incentive Compensation Plan").
            The amount, if any, of such incentive bonus shall be based on the
            extent to which Executive or Company, or both, achieve objectives
            set forth in the Incentive Compensation Plan for the relevant time
            period.

      3. NO OTHER AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly set forth herein, there are no
other amendments to the Original Agreement.

      4. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this First
Amendment to Employment Agreement on the date first above written.

INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By: /s/ Stanley Laybourne                   /s/ Karen McGinnis
   --------------------------------         -------------------------------
Name: Stanley Laybourne                     Karen K. McGinnis
Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### CLARK v. STATE.

No. 20796.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 31, 1940.

Hubert T. Faulk, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of cattle; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills óf exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 139 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 139

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for a maximum speed 
  limit of 65 miles per hour on highways with 4 lanes or more located 
          outside of urbanized areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Combest introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for a maximum speed 
  limit of 65 miles per hour on highways with 4 lanes or more located 
          outside of urbanized areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT.

    Section 154(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (1) by inserting ``or any other highway with 
        4 lanes or more open to traffic'' after ``Interstate System''; 
        and
            (2) in clause (2) by inserting ``, or any other highway 
        within its jurisdiction with 4 lanes or more open to traffic,'' 
        after ``Interstate System''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a study 
of the effects on highway safety of increasing the maximum speed limit 
above 55 miles per hour on highways with 4 lanes or more open to 
traffic under the amendments made by section 1 of this Act.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall transmit to Congress 
a report on the results of the study conducted under this section.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cv-03258-C-BK Document 15 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
#### HARDY v. STATE.

No. 21256.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 4, 1940.

Leon Lusk, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty.) of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault, and her punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception, hence no matter of procedure is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

On October 23d an opinion was released affirming the *judgment, and*reciting that the record contained neither bills of exception nor statement of facts. On October 26th appellant filed an unsworn motion, unsupported by affidavits or documentary evidence of any kind, saying: “If this Honorable Court will set this case for a hearing upon as to whether or not it should set aside former ruling of affirmance, this appellant will produce to the satisfaction of your Honors, documentary evidence to show that it was no fault of hers in any manner whatsoever; thát the statement of facts and bills of exceptions were not filed in this case, and if and when such proof is adduced to the satisfaction of your Honors, then the case will have merits sufficient to require this Court to reverse the judgment of the lower Court and grant this appellant a new trial to the end that justice may be done.”

This case was tried and judgment of conviction had on March 5, 1940. Sentence was pronounced on March 9th. The transcript was filed in this court'on July 5, 1940, during recess of the court. The case was not submitted until October 16, 1940. During all this time appellant has made no claim, apparently, that she had been deprived of either statement of facts or bills of exception, and has presented nothing here, save the motion filed on October 26th.

The motions to postpone, and for a rehearing, are overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund V L.P., Series 3 (the  "Partnership") for the quarter ended June 30,
2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that  such  provisions  require  the  audit  report  of Local  Limited
          Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of
          the Public Company  Accounting  Oversight Board for the  Partnership's
          annual financial statements and except that the Report is a cumulative
          report covering the quarter ended June 30, 2003; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 5, 2009
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with  the Annual  Report  of Fi-Tek VII, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending  June  30, 2004 (the  "Report"),
I,  Ronald J. Miller, Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.





-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
October 13, 2004



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with  the Annual  Report  of Fi-Tek VII, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending  June  30, 2004 (the  "Report"),
I,  Frank L. Kramer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.





-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
October 13, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 4678-019, 4679-022]

A final environmental assessment (FEA) is available for public review. The FEA was prepared for New York Power Authority's (licensee) application to operate the Crescent and Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Projects in a run-of-river mode.

In summary, the FEA examines the environmental impacts of three alternatives for operating the Crescent and Vischer Ferry Projects: (1) licensee's proposed action: run-of-river operation; (2) licensee's initial proposed action: limited ponding; and (3) no-action. These alternatives are described in detail in the FEA.

The FEA recommends that the licensee operate the projects in a run-of-river mode in accordance with the licensee's proposed action alternative. The FEA concludes that implementation of this alternative would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

This FEA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects (OEP). Copies of the FEA can be obtained by contacting the Commission's Public Reference Room at (202) 208-1371.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29996  Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SITEL  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, James E. Stevenson,
Jr.,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/  James E. Stevenson, Jr.

James E. Stevenson, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
From Boucher Michael

Sent Wednesday November 12 2008 126 AM GMT

To Goldberg Seth SGoldbergsteptoe com

Cc Boucher Michael mbouchermckennalong com

Subject RE Nalco Response to Buckman

Dear Seth

Thank you for your response We will share and discuss it with our client

Sincerely

Michael Boucher

Counsel to Buckman Laboratories Inc

Michael Boucher

McKenna Long Aidridge LLP 1900 Street NW Suite 100

Washington DC 20006-1110 202 496-7729 -7756 fax

e-mail mboucher@mckennalong.com

From Wersinger Kate On Behalf Of Goldberg Seth

Sent Tuesday November 11 2008 459 PM

To Boucher Michael

Subject Nalco Response to Buckman

Attached is letter responding to letter on behalf of Nalco responding to your November email on behalf of Buckman

Best regards

Seth Goldberg
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Scott D. Kantor, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:


          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
               indicated.



         February 10, 2005                         /s/ Scott D. Kantor
                                                   -------------------
                                                       Scott D. Kantor
                                                       Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 16, 2007*

#### RONALD BEASLEY VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-06-232)

*27Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Jason C. Workman, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimant and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On July 20,2006, claimant was traveling on Madison Avenue in Huntington, Cabell County, when his vehicle struck a piece of rebar that was protruding from the road damaging a deflector on his vehicle.

2. Respondent was responsible for the maintenance of Madison Avenue which it failed to maintain properly on the date of this incident.

3. As a result of this incident, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage in the amount of $464.49.

4. Respondent agrees that the amount of $464.49 for the damages put forth by the claimant is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of Madison Avenue on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimant’s vehicle; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimant may make a recovery for his loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $464.49.

Award of $464.49.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1274

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on certain

wicker products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Mr. ANDREWS of Texas (for himself and Mr. ARCHER) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension

of duty on certain wicker products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON CERTAIN WICKER PRODUCTS.

5 Heading 9902.46.02 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

7 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.
2

•HR 1274 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 takes effect on the 15th day after the date of the enact4 ment of this Act.

5 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

7 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro8 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

10 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend11 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act;

15 and with respect to which there would have been a lower

16 duty if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to

17 such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or

18 reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had oc19 curred on such 15th day.

Æ