alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Recompetition of the Existing Contracts for the Management 
and Operation of the Frederick Cancer Research and Development 
Center.
    Date: December 18, 2000.
    Time: 10:00 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Ritz-Carlton Hotel at Pentagon City, 1250 South Hayes 
Street, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Harvey P. Stein, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8137, Rockville, MD 20892, 
(301/496-7481).

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: November 16, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30173 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1265

To provide for special immigrant status for certain aliens working as

journalists in Hong Kong.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1993

Mr. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for special immigrant status for certain aliens

working as journalists in Hong Kong.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT STATUS FOR CERTAIN

4 ALIENS WORKING AS JOURNALISTS IN HONG

5 KONG.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (c), an alien

7 described in subsection (b) shall be treated as a special

8 immigrant described in section 101(a)(27) of the Immi9 gration and Nationality Act.
2

•HR 1265 IH

1 (b) ALIENS COVERED.—An alien is described in this

2 subsection if the alien is—

3 (1) a journalist residing in Hong Kong—

4 (A) who is a national of Hong Kong or

5 China;

6 (B) whose principal employment or source

7 of income has been the news media (including

8 print, radio, and television) in Hong Kong for

9 at least 3 years prior to an application for spe10 cial immigrant status under this section; and

11 (C) whose welfare or safety is likely to be

12 subject to threats or harassment due directly to

13 the journalist’s work in the news media in

14 Hong Kong; or

15 (2) the spouse or child (as defined in subsection

16 (e)) of an alien described in paragraph (1), if accom17 panying or following to join the alien in coming to

18 the United States.

19 (c) PERIOD OF VALIDITY.—

20 (1) The period of validity of a special immi21 grant visa issued under this section shall be on and

22 after January 1, 1997, and before January 1, 2002.

23 (2) Before the date an alien seeks to be admit24 ted to the United States as a special immigrant

25 under this section, the alien shall notify the appro-
3

•HR 1265 IH

1 priate consular officer of the alien’s intention to seek

2 such admission and provide such officer with such

3 information as the officer determines to be necessary

4 to verify that the alien remains eligible for admission

5 to the United States as an immigrant.

6 (d) NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS.—Not more than

7 1,500 visas shall be made available to aliens as special

8 immigrants under this section. Aliens admitted under this

9 section shall not be counted against any numerical limita10 tion established under section 201 or 202 of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act.

12 (e) TREATMENT OF CHILDREN.—In this section, the

13 term ‘‘child’’ has the meaning given such term in section

14 101(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and

15 also includes (for purposes of this section and the Immi16 gration and Nationality Act as it applies to this section)

17 an alien who was the child (as so defined) of the alien

18 as of the date of the issuance of an immigrant visa to

19 the alien described in subsection (b)(1).

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James B. Perry, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant. 

 

 

November 14, 2005
LETTER AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 April 28, 2005 
  
 F. Neal Hunter 
 89 Crooked Creek Lane 
 Durham, NC 27713 
  
 Dear Neal: 
  
 I am pleased to
offer you a one-year appointment as Director Emeritus of Cree, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to a statement of policy adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors on November 3, 2004 and the terms stated in this letter. If you accept
the appointment under these terms, you will become a part-time employee of the Company, with the title of “Director Emeritus,” effective upon your resignation as a member of the Board of Directors on April 25, 2005. 
  
 As Director Emeritus you will report to me as Chairman to provide advice and
assistance on such matters within your expertise or experience as the Chairman may from time to time request. The time commitment required of you will not exceed twelve hours during any three month period. As compensation for your services the
Company will pay you a salary at an annual rate of $5,000 per year, less applicable withholdings, in accordance with its standard payroll practices as in effect from time to time. In addition, you may participate in benefit plans offered to Company
employees generally, for which you may be eligible, if any, subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions of such plans. The Company will also reimburse you for reasonable expenses incurred in your work for the Company, subject to and
in accordance with its standard reimbursement policies and procedures in effect from time to time. Further, the Company will recognize your service as Director Emeritus as employment with the Company for purposes of the expiration provisions of the
stock options previously granted to you. 
  
 It is a condition of
your employment as Director Emeritus that you continue to comply with your obligations to the Company as an employee, including contractual obligations regarding confidential information, intellectual property and non-competition, and that you also
comply with all Company policies applicable to employees generally, including the Company’s securities trading policy. 
  
 Your employment will continue through April 25, 2006. Your new salary rate as Director Emeritus will be effective beginning April 26, 2005. You may resign
as Director Emeritus and terminate your employment at any time upon notice to the Company. The Board of Directors or Chairman, acting on the Company’s behalf, may terminate your employment only for cause, with “cause” defined as a
material breach of contractual obligations owed to the Company, a material failure to perform assigned duties or a material failure to comply with Company policies. 
  
 If you wish to accept an appointment as Director Emeritus under these terms, please indicate your acceptance by
counter-signing this letter below and returning it by fax to the attention of the Company’s Secretary, Adam Broome, at 919-313-5456. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,
  
 CREE, INC.

	
	/s/    CHARLES M.
SWOBODA        
	 Charles M. Swoboda
 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President



  










	
	 Enclosure
  
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

	
	/s/    F. NEAL HUNTER        
	F. Neal Hunter

  
 Dated: 4/30/05
#### KEYS v. ALAMO CITY BASEBALL CO.

No. 10901.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

July 10, 1940.

Sam G. Newton and Van H. Archer, both of San Antonio, for appellant.

House & Irvin, of San Antonio, for ap-pellee.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Appellee, Alamo City Baseball Company, has filed its motion, first, to dismiss the appeal because the appeal bond was not timely filed, second, to strike statement of facts .because it includes an ex parte statement of the official court reporter, and, third, in the alternative, to strike the ex parte statement from the filed statement of facts.

The appeal bond was timely filed below, that is, within thirty days after motion for new trial was overruled, but it - is defective in form and substance in that it does not disclose the date of, or efficiently describe, the judgment from which appeal is sought to be prosecuted. These defects, however, are such as may be cured by substituting a proper new bond, which will be allowed. Art. 1840, R.S.; 3 Tex.Jur. p. 344, §§ 241, 242.

The court reporter has attached to the statement of facts an ex parte statement, under date of May 23, 1940, which, not having been agreed to by the parties or approved by the trial judge, cannot be *695considered for any purpose on this appeal, and will therefore be stricken as prayed for by appellee. 3 Tex.Jur. p. 627, § 440. But this does not warrant striking the entire statement of facts.

Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal will be overruled on condition that appellant file a new and sufficient appeal bond, approved by the clerk of this Court, on or before July 20, 1940; otherwise the appeal must be dismissed. Ap-pellee’s motion to strike statement of facts will be overruled, but its motion to strike the ex parte statement of the court reporter will be granted, all at the cost of appellant
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00790-CR

Ventura Reyes ALVARADO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR9646

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court imposed sentence on October 29, 2015, and appellant did not file a motion 

for new trial. Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial, the deadline for filing 

a notice of appeal was November 30, 2015 – November 28, 2015 was a Saturday See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was not filed until December 7, 2015, and appellant did 

not timely file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.3. 

We therefore ORDER appellant to file a written response in this court on or before 

January 21, 2016 showing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely notice of appeal 

is necessary to invoke court of appeals’ jurisdiction). If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond 

within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If a supplemental 

clerk’s record is required to show jurisdiction, appellant must ask the trial court clerk to prepare 

one and must notify the clerk of this court that such a request was made. All deadlines in this 

matter are suspended until further order of the court.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the court 

reporter. 
_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7281
GEORGE EARL PERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BETSY DAVIS BEAMER, Secretary of the Commonwealth, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-265) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Earl Perry, Appellant Pro Se. James Walter Hopper, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. Beamer , No. CA-96-265 (E.D. Va. July 26, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for oral arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Ernestine C. Merchant et al., Appellants, v Town of Halfmoon, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Viscardi, J.), entered April 3, 1990 in Saratoga County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendant’s fifth affirmative defense.

This is an action against defendant, a municipal corporation, seeking damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. The underlying issue to be resolved on this appeal is whether the original notice of claim served pursuant to the provisions of the General Municipal Law included an adequate statement of "the time when, the place where and the manner in which the claim arose” (General Municipal Law § 50-e [2] [3]). After identifying the date and time of the accident, the notice of claim stated, *inter alia,*that "[t]he place of the happening of the accident resulting in the injuries and the claims was on Johnson Road near Raylinski Lane in the Town of Halfmoon, County of Saratoga, State of New York”.

In our view, the notice of claim described the situs of the accident with sufficient particularity to enable defendant to locate alleged defects in the roadway in order to investigate the claim *(see, Bravo v City of New York,*122 AD2d 761; *Evers v City of New York,*90 AD2d 786). Moreover, the record clearly demonstrates that a representative of defendant conducted, after service of the notice of claim, a preliminary investigation of the claim and, in a written communication to plaintiff’s attorney, asserted that he failed to see any cause of action against defendant. Accordingly, there can be no claim of prejudice by defendant, a conclusion which is buttressed by Supreme Court’s grant of plaintiffs’ cross motion to file an amended claim nunc pro tunc *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-e [6]; *Evers v City of New York, supra).*

Order modified, on the law and the facts, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as denied plaintiffs’ motion to *777strike the fifth affirmative defense; motion granted to that extent and said affirmative defense dismissed; and, as so modified, affirmed. Kane, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercare, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1215

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to require a reasonable

attorney’s fee to be awarded to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission as a prevailing party.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1993

Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to

require a reasonable attorney’s fee to be awarded to

the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as a

prevailing party.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 Section 706(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

5 U.S.C. 2000e–5(k)) is amended by striking ‘‘court,’’ and

6 all that follows through ‘‘States’’ the first place it appears,

7 and inserting the following

8 ‘‘court—
2

•HR 1215 IH

1 ‘‘(1) in its discretion, may allow the prevailing

2 party other than the United States (including the

3 Commission); and

4 ‘‘(2) shall award to the Commission, if the

5 Commission is a prevailing party;’’.

6 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

7 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub8 section (b), this section and the amendment made by sec9 tion 1 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of

10 this Act.

11 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment

12 made by section 1 shall not apply with respect to a pro13 ceeding or action commenced under title VII of the Civil

14 Rights Act of 1964 before the date of the enactment of

15 this Act.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1,2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNRPARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC,as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, COMM 2015-CCRE24 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, ExecutiveVice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2018.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive VicePresident 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
exv10w4



 






Exhibit 10.4




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




The Employment Agreement made as of the 26th day of February, 2001 by and between AvalonBay

Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Timothy J. Naughton (“Executive”) is

hereby amended as follows:




Section 7(c)(iii)(B) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting said subsection in
its entirety and substituting thereof the following:





     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and”



Section 7(c)(iv) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection II in the
second paragraph thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





     “II. Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on
the whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive.”



Section 7(c)(v) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (B) thereof in
its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and”



     Section 7(c)(vi) of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting subsection (B) thereof in its
entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:




     “(B) Continue to pay the premiums then due or thereafter payable on the
whole-life portion of the split-dollar insurance policy referenced under
Section 3(d) in accordance with, and to the extent required by, the
provisions of the Split Dollar Agreement between the Company and Executive;
and


Except as amended herein, the Employment Agreement is hereby confirmed in all
other respects.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is entered into this 31st day of
March, 2005.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charlene Rothkopf
 	 
	 	 	Charlene Rothkopf, EVP – Human Resources 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	                                                          /s/ Edward M. Schulman
 	 
	 	 	Edward M. Schulman, 	 
	 	 	SVP, General Counsel & Secretary 	 
	 
	 	Timothy J. Naughton 	 
	 	
Executive
# L_2013160EN.01S00301.xml

| 12.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---