alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00088-Z-BR

§

AUSTIN WAYNE MASSEY (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

AUSTIN WAYNE MASSEY (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining AUSTIN WAYNE MASSEY (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in 

Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that AUSTIN WAYNE MASSEY (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) -

CONVICTED FELON IN POSSESSION OF A FIREARM and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found 

guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: November 4, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00088-Z-BR Document 29 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 66
SERVED: November 24,2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

HOTTON ENTERPRISES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1081 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On February 19,2014, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") 

filed a Complaint. On February 6, 2014, Hotten Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") 

filed a Request for Hearing. 

On October 14, 2014, Respondent filed a Motion to Withdraw Appeal averring the matter 

has settled. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Respondent's Motion to Withdraw Appeal having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Motion to Withdraw Appeal be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

Timothy I. McCulloch, Respondent's Counsel 

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 

3200 North Central Avenue, Suite 800 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

TEL: 602-63 1-4400 

FAX: 602-631-4404 

EMAIL: tmcculloh@hinshawlaw.com 

Ashok Vij, President/CEO 

ONE COPY 

Botton Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a/ Premier Aviation, Respondent 

1951 East Airport Drive 

Tucson, AZ 85756 

TEL: 520-907-8926 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region, APW-7.12 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 425-227-2914 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1081 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1226 

To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and fresh and frozen 

meat and products of ruminants and swine, from Argentina until the 

Secretary of Agriculture certifies to Congress that every region of Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2009 

Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN (for herself and Mrs. LUMMIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and 

fresh and frozen meat and products of ruminants and 

swine, from Argentina until the Secretary of Agriculture 

certifies to Congress that every region of Argentina is 

free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foot and Mouth Dis5 ease Prevention Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1226 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF ARGENTINE 

2 RUMINANTS AND SWINE UNTIL ARGENTINA 

3 IS FREE OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE 

4 WITHOUT VACCINATION. 

5 The Secretary of Agriculture shall prohibit the impor6 tation into the United States of any ruminant or swine, 

7 or any fresh (including chilled or frozen) meat or fresh 

8 (including chilled or frozen) product of any ruminant or 

9 swine, that is born, raised, or slaughtered in Argentina 

10 until the Secretary certifies to Congress that every region 

11 of Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vac12 cination. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit
99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Francis X. McCarthy, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/S/    FRANCIS X. MCCARTHY, JR.

---

Francis X. McCarthy, Jr.

Chief Financial
Officer of

Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc.





May 15, 2003
United States District Court 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED ST ATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

V. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3 :22-CR-00424-S 

§ 

ERICK ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ (I) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning 

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed 

within 14 days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(I), the undersigned District Judge 

is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea 

of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Couti accepts the 

plea of guilty, and ERICK ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of Possession 

of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(l) and 924(a)(8). 

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. 

The Defendant is ordered to remain in custody. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED February 2, 2024. 

KAREN GREN SCHOLER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00424-S Document 32 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
# C_2006074EN.01000801.xml

| 25.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/8

---

Action brought on 27 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-42/06)

(2006/C 74/15)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 January 2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Stromsky, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by imposing, in the Brussels-Capital Region, a system of approval of natural and legal persons manufacturing and/or distributing refuse collection bags, the detailed rules of which infringe the principle of proportionality, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by imposing, in the Brussels-Capital Region, a system of approval of natural and legal persons manufacturing and/or distributing refuse collection bags, the detailed rules of which infringe the principle of proportionality, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty;

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

No Community harmonisation governs the approval of natural and legal persons manufacturing and/or distributing refuse collection bags.

In those circumstances, national legislation requiring the approval of natural and legal persons manufacturing and/or distributing refuse collection bags must be evaluated in the light of Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.

According to the case-law of the Court of Justice, a prior authorisation procedure such as that laid down by Article 10a of the Regulations of the Brussels-Capital Region of 15 July 1993 on refuse collection, can restrict the free movement of goods.

To be justified with regard to the fundamental freedom of the free movement of goods, such a prior authorisation procedure must pursue a public interest purpose recognised by Community law and comply with the principle of proportionality, that is to say be appropriate to ensure the attainment of the objective pursued and not go beyond what is necessary for its attainment.

The Commission can conceive that an approval procedure might be such as to pursue the public interest purposes of protection of workers' health and of the environment.

However, the Commission submits that, in this case, the detailed rules of the approval procedure under Article 10a of the Regulations do not comply with the principle of proportionality because it is not easily accessible.

---
# Official Journal C 253/12 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5912 July 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5912 July 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2016/C 253/01 | Position (EU) No 11/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries as regards the conferral of delegated and implementing powers on the Commission for the adoption of certain measuresAdopted by the Council on 16 June 2016 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 253/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 11/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries as regards the conferral of delegated and implementing powers on the Commission for the adoption of certain measures | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2016/C 253/01

Position (EU) No 11/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries as regards the conferral of delegated and implementing powers on the Commission for the adoption of certain measuresAdopted by the Council on 16 June 2016 (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 253/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 11/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries as regards the conferral of delegated and implementing powers on the Commission for the adoption of certain measures

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Sanjit Biswas, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Samsara Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date:March 30, 2022By:/s/ Sanjit BiswasSanjit BiswasChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P.Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C30, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 9, 2004                           /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   S. Leslie Flegel

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 9, 2004                          /s/ Marc Fierman
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Marc Fierman
Page 1 of 1

TIGTA 3.1 Table

$000,000s

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Percent

Capital Investments Total 3.157 - 9.631 - 12.788 2.985 - 9.103 - 12.088 2.977 - 8.986 - 11.963 -1%

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 3.157 - 9.470 - 12.627 2.985 - 8.955 - 11.940 2.977 - 8.931 - 11.908 0%

IT Total 3.157 - 9.470 - 12.627 2.985 - 8.955 - 11.940 2.977 - 8.931 - 11.908 0%

non-IT Total - - 0.161 - 0.161 - - 0.149 - 0.149 - - 0.054 - 0.054 -64%

TIGTA Major IT Investments

TIGTA non-Major IT Investments

TIGTA IT Applications and Collaboration (IT A&C) 0.859 - 2.577 - 3.436 0.866 - 2.598 - 3.464 0.833 - 2.499 - 3.332 -4%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.859 - 2.577 - 3.436 0.866 - 2.598 - 3.464 0.833 - 2.499 - 3.332 -4%

TIGTA IT Enterprise Architecture & Management (IT 

EA&M)

0.224 - 0.671 - 0.895 0.251 - 0.753 - 1.004 0.257 - 0.772 - 1.029 3%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.224 - 0.671 - 0.895 0.251 - 0.753 - 1.004 0.257 - 0.772 - 1.029 3%

TIGTA IT Infrastructure End User Systems and 

Support (ITI EUSS)

1.091 - 3.272 - 4.363 0.786 - 2.357 - 3.143 0.788 - 2.365 - 3.153 0%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 1.091 - 3.272 - 4.363 0.786 - 2.357 - 3.143 0.788 - 2.365 - 3.153 0%

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Mainframe and Servers 

Services and Support (ITI MSSS)

0.545 - 1.634 - 2.179 0.631 - 1.892 - 2.523 0.607 - 1.820 - 2.427 -4%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.545 - 1.634 - 2.179 0.631 - 1.892 - 2.523 0.607 - 1.820 - 2.427 -4%

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Telecommunications (ITT TSS) 0.439 - 1.316 - 1.755 0.451 - 1.354 - 1.805 0.492 - 1.477 - 1.969 9%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.439 - 1.316 - 1.755 0.451 - 1.354 - 1.805 0.492 - 1.477 - 1.969 9%

TIGTA non-IT Investments

TIGTA Vehicle Fleet - - 0.161 - 0.161 - - 0.149 - 0.149 - - 0.054 - 0.054 -64%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses - - 0.161 - 0.161 - - 0.149 - 0.149 - - 0.054 - 0.054 -64%

PY 2016 Funding (Actual) CY 2017 Funding (Enacted) BY 2018 Funding (Estimated) 

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

Change 

from CY 

to BY