70804 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 28, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

Control period

Class I substances in

groups I

and III,

(In percent)

Class I substances in

group II,

(In percent)

Class I substances in

group IV

(In percent)

Class I substances in

group V

(In percent)

Class I substances in

group VI

(In percent)

Class I substances in

group VII

(In percent)

2005 ................................................................................. .................... .................... .................... .................... 0 ....................

4. Section 82.9 is amended by:

a. Revising paragraph (a)(2),

b. Revising the first sentence of

paragraph (e) introductory text,

c. Revising paragraph (e)(1)

introductory text,

d. Revising the first sentence of

paragraph (e)(2),

e. Revising the first sentence of

paragraph (e)(3).

The revisions read as follows:

§ 82.9 Availability of allowances in

addition to baseline production allowances.

(a) * * *

(2) 15 percent of their baseline

production allowances for class I, Group

VI controlled substances listed under

§ 82.5 of this subpart for each control

period ending before January 1, 2002;

* * * * *

(e) Until January 1, 1996 for all class

I controlled substances, except Group

VI, and until January 1, 2005 for class

I, Group VI, a person may obtain

production allowances for that

controlled substance equal to the

amount of that controlled substance

produced in the United States that was

transformed or destroyed within the

United States, or transformed or

destroyed by a person of another Party,

in the cases where production

allowances were expended to produce

such substance in the U.S. in

accordance with the provisions of this

paragraph. * * *

(1) Until January 1, 1996, for all class

I controlled substances, except Group

VI, and until January 1, 2005, for class

I, Group VI, a person must submit a

request for production allowances that

includes the following:

* * * * *

(2) Until January 1, 1996 for all class

I controlled substances, except Group

VI, and until January 1, 2005, for class

I, Group VI, the Administrator will

review the information and

documentation submitted under

paragraph (e)(1) of this section and will

assess the quantity of class I controlled

substance that the documentation and

information verifies was transformed or

destroyed. * * *

(3) Until January 1, 1996 for all class

I controlled substances, except Group

VI, and until January 1, 2005, for class

I, Group VI, if the Administrator

determines that the request for

production allowances does not

satisfactorily substantiate that the

person transformed or destroyed

controlled substances as claimed, or that

modified allowances were not

expended, the Administrator will issue

a notice disallowing the request for

additional production allowances.

***

* * * * *

5. Section 82.10 is amended by

revising paragraphs (a) introductory

text, (a)(1) introductory text, the first

sentence of (b), and the first sentence of

paragraph (c) introductory text as

follows:

§ 82.10 Availability of consumption

allowances in addition to baseline

consumption allowances.

(a) Until January 1, 1996 for all class

I controlled substances, except Group

VI, and until January 1, 2005, for class

I, Group VI, any person may obtain, in

accordance with the provisions of this

subsection, consumption allowances

equivalent to the level of class I

controlled substances (other than used

controlled substances or transhipments)

that the person has exported from the

United States and its territories to a

Party (as listed in appendix C to this

subpart).

(1) Until January 1, 1996 for all class

I controlled substances, except Group

VI, and until January 1, 2005, for class

I, Group VI, to receive consumption

allowances in addition to baseline

consumption allowances, the exporter

of the class I controlled substances must

submit to the Administrator a request

for consumption allowances setting

forth the following:

* * * * *

(b) Until January 1, 1996, a person

may obtain consumption allowances for

a class I controlled substance (and until

January 1, 2005 for class I, Group VI)

equal to the amount of a controlled

substance either produced in, or

imported into, the United States that

was transformed or destroyed in the

case where consumption allowances

were expended to produce or import

such substance in accordance with the

provisions of this paragraph. * * *

(c) A company may also increase its

consumption allowances by receiving

production from another Party to the

Protocol for class I, Group I through

Group V and Group VII controlled

substances until January 1, 1996 and for

class I, Group VI controlled substances

until January 1, 2005. * * *

* * * * *

6. Section 82.12 is amended by

revising paragraphs (a)(1) introductory

text and (b)(1) as follows:

§ 82.12 Transfers.

(a) * * *

(1) Until January 1, 1996, for all class

I controlled substances, except for

Group VI, and until January 1, 2005, for

Group VI, and person (‘‘transferor’’) may

transfer to any other person

(‘‘transferee’’) any amount of the

transferor’s consumption allowances or

production allowances, and effective

January 1, 1995, for all class I controlled

substances any person (‘‘transferor’’)

may transfer to any other person

(‘‘transferee’’) any amount of the

transferor’s Article 5 allowances, as

follows:

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(1) Until January 1, 1996, for all class

I controlled substances, except Group

VI, and until January 1, 2005 for Group

VI, any person (‘‘convertor’’) may

convert consumption allowances or

production allowances for one class I

controlled substance to the same type of

allowance for another class I controlled

substance within the same Group as the

first as listed in appendix A of this

subpart, following the procedures

described in paragraph (b)(4) of this

section.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 00–30109 Filed 11–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL–6907–3]

Georgia: Final Authorization of State

Hazardous Waste Management

Program Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Immediate final rule.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 28, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 70805

SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to EPA

for Final authorization of the changes to

its hazardous waste program under the

Resource Conservation and Recovery

Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that

these changes satisfy all requirements

needed to qualify for Final

authorization, and is authorizing the

State’s changes through this immediate

final action. EPA is publishing this rule

to authorize the changes without a prior

proposal because we believe this action

is not controversial and do not expect

comments that oppose it. Unless we get

written comments which oppose this

authorization during the comment

period, the decision to authorize

Georgia’s changes to their hazardous

waste program will take effect. If we get

comments that oppose this action, we

will publish a document in the Federal

Register withdrawing this rule before it

takes effect and a separate document in

the proposed rules section of this

Federal Register will serve as a proposal

to authorize the changes.

DATES: This Final authorization will

become effective on January 29, 2001

unless EPA receives adverse written

comment by December 28, 2000. If EPA

receives such comment, it will publish

a timely withdrawal of this immediate

final rule in the Federal Register and

inform the public that this authorization

will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to

Narindar Kumar, Chief, RCRA Programs

Branch, Waste Management Division,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center,

61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia

30303–8960; (404) 562–8440. You can

view and copy Georgia’s application

from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the following

addresses: The Georgia Department of

Natural Resources Environmental

Protection Division, 205 Butler Street,

Suite 1154 East, Atlanta Georgia 30334–

4910, and from 8:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m.,

EPA Region 4, Library, The Sam Nunn

Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth

Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–

8960, Phone number (404) 562–8190,

Kathy Piselli, Librarian.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Narindar Kumar, Chief, RCRA Programs

Branch, Waste Management Division,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center,

61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia

30303–8960; (404) 562–8440.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Why are Revisions to State Programs

Necessary?

States which have received final

authorization from EPA under RCRA

section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must

maintain a hazardous waste program

that is equivalent to, consistent with,

and no less stringent than the Federal

program. As the Federal program

changes, States must change their

programs and ask EPA to authorize the

changes. Changes to State programs may

be necessary when Federal or State

statutory or regulatory authority is

modified or when certain other changes

occur. Most commonly, States must

change their programs because of

changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code

of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,

260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.

B. What Decisions Have We Made in

this Rule?

We conclude that Georgia’s

application to revise its authorized

program meets all of the statutory and

regulatory requirements established by

RCRA. Therefore, we grant Georgia

Final authorization to operate its

hazardous waste program with the

changes described in the authorization

application. Georgia has responsibility

for permitting Treatment, Storage, and

Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its

borders and for carrying out the aspects

of the RCRA program described in its

revised program application, subject to

the limitations of the Hazardous and

Solid Waste Amendments of 1984

(HSWA). New Federal requirements and

prohibitions imposed by Federal

regulations that EPA promulgates under

the authority of HSWA take effect in

authorized States before they are

authorized for the requirements. Thus,

EPA will implement those requirements

and prohibitions in Georgia, including

issuing permits, until the State is

granted authorization to do so.

C. What Is the Effect of Today’s

Authorization Decision?

The effect of this decision is that a

facility in Georgia subject to RCRA will

now have to comply with the authorized

State requirements instead of the

equivalent Federal requirements in

order to comply with RCRA. Georgia has

enforcement responsibilities under its

State hazardous waste program for

violations of such program, but EPA

retains its authority under RCRA

sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,

which include, among others, authority

to:

• Do inspections, and require

monitoring, tests, analyses or reports

• Enforce RCRA requirements and

suspend or revoke permits

• Take enforcement actions regardless

of whether the State has taken its own

actions

This action does not impose

additional requirements on the

regulated community because the

regulations for which Georgia is being

authorized by today’s action are already

effective, and are not changed by today’s

action.

D. Why Wasn’t There a Proposed Rule

Before Today’s Rule?

EPA did not publish a proposal before

today’s rule because we view this as a

routine program change and do not

expect comments that oppose this

approval. We are providing an

opportunity for public comment now. In

addition to this rule, in the proposed

rules section of today’s Federal Register

we are publishing a separate document

that proposes to authorize the State

program changes.

E. What Happens if EPA Receives

Comments That Oppose This Action?

If EPA receives comments that oppose

this authorization, we will withdraw

this rule by publishing a document in

the Federal Register before the rule

becomes effective. EPA will base any

further decision on the authorization of

the State program changes on the

proposal mentioned in the previous

paragraph. We will then address all

public comments in a later final rule.

You may not have another opportunity

to comment. If you want to comment on

this authorization, you must do so at

this time.

If we receive comments that oppose

only the authorization of a particular

change to the State hazardous waste

program, we will withdraw that part of

this rule but the authorization of the

program changes that the comments do

not oppose will become effective on the

date specified above. The Federal

Register withdrawal document will

specify which part of the authorization

will become effective, and which part is

being withdrawn.

F. What has Georgia Previously Been

Authorized for?

Georgia initially received Final

authorization on August 7, 1984,

effective August 21, 1984 (49 FR 31417),

to implement the RCRA hazardous

waste management program. We granted

authorization for changes to their

program on July 7, 1986, effective

September 18, 1986 (51 FR 24549), July

28, 1988, effective September 26, 1988

(53 FR 28383), July 24, 1990, effective

September 24, 1990 (55 FR 30000),

February 12, 1991, effective April 15,

1991 (56 FR 5656), May 11, 1992,

effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20055),

November 25, 1992, effective January

25, 1993 (57 FR 55466), February 26,

1993, effective April 27, 1993 (58 FR

11539), November 16, 1993, effective

70806 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 28, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

January 18, 1994 (58 FR 60388), April

26, 1994, effective June 27, 1994 (59 FR

21664), May 10, 1995, effective July 10,

1995 (60 FR 24790), August 30, 1995,

effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR

45069), March 7, 1996, effective May 6,

1996 (61 FR 9108), September 18, 1998,

effective November 17, 1998 (63 FR

49852), and October 14, 1999, effective

December 13, 1999 (64 FR 55629).

G. What Changes are We Authorizing

with Today’s Action?

On April 28, 2000, Georgia submitted

a final complete program revision

application, seeking authorization of

their changes in accordance with 40

CFR 271.21. Georgia’s revision consists

of provisions promulgated July 1, 1997

through June 30, 1998, otherwise known

as HSWA Cluster VIII. We now make an

immediate final decision, subject to

receipt of written comments that oppose

this action, that Georgia’s hazardous

waste program revision satisfies all of

the requirements necessary to qualify

for Final authorization. Therefore, we

grant Georgia Final authorization for the

following program changes:

Description of Federal requirement Federal Register Analogous State authority 1

Checklist 160, Land Disposal Restrictions

Phase III—Emergency Extension of the

K088 National Capacity Variance, Amendment.

7/14/97 .............................

(62 FR 37699)

Georgia Hazardous Waste Management, Official Code of Georgia

Annotated (GHWMA, O.C.G.A.) Section 12–8–62(14), 12–8–64

(1) (A), (B), (D), (F), and (I), 12–8–65(a) (16), and (21); Rule

391–3–11–.16.

Checklist 161, Emergency Revision of the

Carbamate Land Disposal Restrictions.

8/28/97 .............................

(62 FR 45572)

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62(14) and (23), 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B),

(D), (F), and (I), 12–8–65(a) (16) and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.16.

Checklist 162, Clarification of Standards for

Hazardous Waste LDR Treatment

Variances.

12/5/97 .............................

(62 FR 64509)

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62 (14) and (23), 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B),

(D), (F), and (I), 12–8–65 (a) (14), (16), and (21); Rule 391–3–

11–.16.

Checklist 163, Organic Air Emission Standards for Tanks, Surface Impoundments,

and Containers; Clarification and Technical

Amendment.

12/8/97 .............................

(62 FR 64656–64671)

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F), 12–

8–65(a) (3), (16), and (21), 12–8–66; Rules 391–3–11.01(2),

391–3–11.10(1), 391–3–11.11(3)(h)

Checklist 164, Kraft Mill Steam Stripper Condensate Exclusion.4/15/98 .............................

(63 FR 18635–18751)

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62 (10) and (20), 12–8–64 (1) (D) and

(J), 12–8–65 (a) (16) and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.07(1).

Checklist 166, Recycled Used Oil Management Standards, Technical Correction and

Clarification.

5/6/98 ...............................

(63 FR 24968–24969)

7/14/98

(63 FR 37781–37782)

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62(11), (12), (13), (21), and (22), 12–8–

64(1) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (I), and (L), 12–8–65(a) (3), (16),

and (21), 12–8–66; Rules 391–3–11.07(1), 391–3–11–.17.

Checklist 167A, Land Disposal Restrictions

Phase IV—Treatment Standards for Metal

Wastes and Mineral Processing.

Checklist 167B, Land Disposal Restrictions

Phase IV—Hazardous Soils Treatment

Standards and Exclusions

Checklist 167C, Land Disposal Restrictions

Phase IV—Corrections

Checklist 167E, Bevill Exclusion Revisions

and Clarifications

Checklist 167F, Exclusion of Recycled Wood

Preserving Wastewaters

5/26/98 .............................

(63 FR 28636–28753)

6/8/98

(63 FR 31266)

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62 (14) and (23), 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B),

(D), (F), and (I), 12–8–65 (a) (16), and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.16.

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62 (14) and (23), 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B),

(D), (F), and (I), 12–8–65 (a) (16), and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.16.

GHWMA O.C.G.A. 12–8–62 (14) and (23), 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B),

(D), (F), and (I), 12–8–65 (a) (14), (16) and (21); Rule 391–3–

11–.16.

GHWMA O.C.G.A. 12–8–62(14) and (23), 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B), (D),

(F), and (I), 12–8–65 (a) (16) and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.16.

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62(10) and (20), 12–8–64 (1) (D), and

(J), 12–8–65 (a) (16) and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.07(1).

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62(10) and (20), 12–8–64 (1) (D), (J),

and (L), 12–8–65 (a) (16) and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.07(1).

Checklist 168, Hazardous Waste Combustors:

Revised Standards.

6/19/98 .............................

(63 FR 33823–33829)

GHWMA, O.C.G.A. 12–8–62 (10) and (20), 12–8–64 (1) (D), (J),

and (L), 12–8–65 (a) (16) and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.07(1).

GHWMA O.C.G.A. 12–8–64 (1) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), and (I),

12–8–65(a) (3), (16), and (21); Rule 391–3–11–.11(7)(d) and

(3)(f).

1The Georgia provisions are from the Georgia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations effective December 23, 1998.

H. Where Are the Revised State Rules

Different From the Federal Rules?

There are no State requirements in

this program revision considered to be

more stringent or broader in scope than

the Federal requirements.

I. Who Handles Permits After the

Authorization Takes Effect?

Georgia will issue permits for all the

provisions for which it is authorized

and will administer the permits it

issues. EPA will continue to administer

any RCRA hazardous waste permits or

portions of permits which we issued

prior to the effective date of this

authorization until they expire or are

terminated. We will not issue any more

new permits or new portions of permits

for the provisions listed in the Table

above after the effective date of this

authorization. EPA will continue to

implement and issue permits for HSWA

requirements for which Georgia is not

yet authorized.

J. What Is Codification and Is EPA

Codifying Georgia’s Hazardous Waste

Program as Authorized in This Rule?

Codification is the process of placing

the State’s statutes and regulations that

comprise the State’s authorized

hazardous waste program into the Code

of Federal Regulations. We do this by

referencing the authorized State rules in

40 CFR part 272. We reserve the

amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart

L for this authorization of Georgia’s

program until a later date.

K. Administrative Requirements

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this action from the

requirements of Executive Order 12866

(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and

therefore this action is not subject to

review by OMB. This action authorizes

State requirements for the purpose of

RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional

requirements beyond those imposed by

State law. Accordingly, I certify that this

action will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601

et seq.). Because this action authorizes

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 28, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 70807

pre-existing requirements under State

law and does not impose any additional

enforceable duty beyond that required

by State law, it does not contain any

unfunded mandate or significantly or

uniquely affect small governments, as

described in the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For

the same reason, this action also does

not significantly or uniquely affect the

communities of Tribal governments, as

specified by Executive Order 13084 (63

FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This action

will not have substantial direct effects

on the States, on the relationship

between the national government and

the States, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities among the

various levels of government, as

specified in Executive Order 13132 (64

FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it

merely authorizes State requirements as

part of the State RCRA hazardous waste

program without altering the

relationship or the distribution of power

and responsibilities established by

RCRA. This action also is not subject to

Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,

April 23, 1997), because it is not

economically significant and it does not

make decisions based on environmental

health or safety risks.

Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a

State’s application for authorization as

long as the State meets the criteria

required by RCRA. It would thus be

inconsistent with applicable law for

EPA, when it reviews a State

authorization application, to require the

use of any particular voluntary

consensus standard in place of another

standard that otherwise satisfies the

requirements of RCRA. Thus, the

requirements of section 12(d) of the

National Technology Transfer and

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.

272 note) do not apply. As required by

section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61

F.R. 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing

this rule, EPA has taken the necessary

steps to eliminate drafting errors and

ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,

and provide a clear legal standard for

affected conduct. EPA has complied

with Executive Order 12630 (53 F.R.

8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the

takings implications of the rule in

accordance with the ‘‘Attorney

General’s Supplemental Guidelines for

the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of

Unanticipated Takings’ issued under the

executive order. This rule does not

impose an information collection

burden under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this document and

other required information to the U.S.

Senate, the U.S. House of

Representatives, and the Comptroller

General of the United States prior to

publication in the Federal Register. A

major rule cannot take effect until 60

days after it is published in the Federal

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This

action will be effective January 29, 2001.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Confidential business information,

Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste

transportation, Indian lands,

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Authority: This action is issued under the

authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and

7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as

amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).

Dated: October 26, 2000.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 00–30006 Filed 11–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[WT Docket No. 97–82; FCC 00–274]

Competitive Bidding Procedures;

Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

SUMMARY: This document contains

corrections to the final regulations

which were published in the Federal

Register of Tuesday, August 29, 2000,

(65 FR 52323). The regulations related

to the competitive bidding rules for all

auctionable services in § 1.2110 of the

Commission’s rules.

DATES: Effective November 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leora Hochstein, Auctions and Industry

Analysis Division, Wireless

Telecommunications Bureau, at (202)

418–0660.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the

Federal Register of August 29, 2000 (65

FR 52323), the Commission published a

summary of its Order on

Reconsideration of the Third Report and

Order, Fifth Report and Order (Order on

Reconsideration, Fifth Report and

Order) in WT Docket No. 97–82. That

document clarified and amended the

Commission’s competitive bidding rules

in an ongoing effort to establish a

uniform and streamlined set of general

competitive bidding rules for all

auctionable services and to reduce the

burden on both the Commission and the

public of conducting service-specific

auction rule makings.

Need for Correction

As published, the final regulations

contain errors which may prove to be

misleading and need to be clarified.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 1

Communications common carriers,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Correction to CFR

Accordingly, 47 CFR part 1 is

corrected by making the following

correcting amendments:

PART 1—PRACTICE AND

PROCEDURE

1. The authority citation for part 1

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),

155, 225, 303(r), 309 and 325(e).

2. Section 1.2112 is amended by

revising paragraph (a)(6) to read as

follows:

§ 1.2112 Ownership disclosure

requirements for short- and long-form

applications.

(a) * * *

(6) Any FCC-regulated entity or

applicant for an FCC license, in which

the applicant or any of the parties

identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through

(5) of this section, owns 10 percent or

more of stock, whether voting or

nonvoting, common or preferred. This

list must include a description of each

such entity’s principal business and a

description of each such entity’s

relationship to the applicant (e.g.,

Company A owns 10 percent of

Company B (the applicant) and 10

percent of Company C, then Companies

A and C must be listed on Company B’s

application, where C is an FCC licensee

and/or license applicant);

* * * * *

Correction to Preamble

In the preamble to the same rule [FR

Doc. 00–21982 published on August 29,