alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### COUNTY SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF ORANGE COUNTY et al., Appellants, v. DISTRICT TRUSTEES OF PRAIRIE VIEW COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 8, OF ORANGE, COUNTY, Appellees.

No. 3649.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Sept. 18, 1941.

K. W. Stephenson, of Orange, for appellant.

E. L. Reid and F. W. Plustmyre, both of Orange, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

On authority of the opinion of the Supreme Court answering questions certified by us to it in this case (153 S.W.2d 434), the judgment of the lower court must be reversed and judgment here rendered in favor of appellants affirming in all respects the order of the County School Trustees of Orange County, passed at a regular meeting of said County School Trustees held on the 12th day of June, 1939, detaching from Prairie View Common School District No. 8, Orange County, Texas, that certain territory described as follows: Lying South of the Bessie Heights Road starting at the intersection of Highway 87 and the Bessie Heights Road; going South meandering Highway 87, to a point known as the South line of the William Dyson Survey; thence West along said Dyson line to where it intersects a County Road known as the Mrs. Turner Road; thence North to the intersection of the Bessie Heights Road; thence along North line of the Prairie View Common School District and the South line of the Orangefield Independent School District, to the place of beginning, and re-defining the boundaries of said Prairie View Common School District No. 8 and attaching the above described territory to the Orangefield Independent School District and re-defining the boundaries of Orangefield Independent School District Reversed and rendered.
#### In the Matter of Jason B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Monroe County Family Court for further proceedings on the petition. Memorandum: The court committed reversible error by failing to ascertain through allocution of respondent and his mother that respondent was aware of the possible specific dispositional orders, as required by Family Court Act § 321.3 (1) *(see, Matter of Ameer Rashid J.,*151 AD2d 1044). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Bonadio, J.—juvenile delinquency.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Glenn Bass, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered November 15, 1989, convicting him of driving while intoxicated, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Case 3:22-cv-01261-S-BN   Document 13   Filed 08/03/23    Page 1 of 1   PageID 135
CCF HOLDING AND SUBSIDIARY

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.     Description
-----------     -----------

11.1    Computation of Per Share Earnings

                                       11
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1

                       CCF HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings

                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                              December 31, 1996
                                                              -----------------

Common stock - shares outstanding as of
   September 30, 1996, net of 190,250 treasury stock ..........    1,000,000

Unallocated ESOP shares as of September 30, 1996 ..............      (63,000)

ESOP shares - committed .......................................          600

Shares repurchased ............................................      (44,088)
                                                                  ---------- 
Weighted average shares outstanding ...........................      893,512
                                                                  ==========

Net income per share ..........................................   $      .10
                                                                  ==========



                                       12
261329Z JAN 23 MID200080685332U

ALCGOFF 005/23 

SUBJ: RESCISSION OF COVID-19 VACCINATION MANDATE – GUIDANCE FOR ACTIVE DUTY OFFICERS

A. ALCOAST 012/23

B. OFFICER ACCESSIONS, EVALUATIONS, AND PROMOTIONS, COMDTINST M1000.3 (series)

C. ALCGPSC 012/23

D. ALCGPSC 016/22

E. ALCGPSC 104/21

1. Purpose: Ref A. prohibits the involuntary administrative separation of members based solely on

their refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination. Consistent with the intent of ref A., this ALCGOFF provides

guidance to units and the officer corps.

2. CG PSC-OPM contacted all officers pending board action to consider involuntary separation based

solely on their refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination and notified them that the pending board action has

been cancelled. Officers who elected to separate in lieu of board action have also been contacted and

separations based solely on their refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination have been cancelled. Any officer

who was issued a notification of intent to initiate board action based solely on their refusal of the

COVID-19 vaccination and has not been contacted by CG PSC-OPM should immediately contact CG PSCOPM-1 (Separations) at HQS-SMB-PSC-OPM-1-Separations@uscg.mil.

3. Assignments:

A. Ref C. cancels all assignment and training restrictions imposed by refs D. and E.

B. Members who remain unvaccinated against COVID-19 are no longer prohibited from executing

Permanent Change of Station orders.

C. Members who had a pending separation in lieu of special board action for remaining unvaccinated

against COVID-19 are encouraged to contact their Assignment Officer for career counseling regarding

Assignment Year 2023.

4. Any future actions stemming from ref A. will be announced and promulgated SEPCOR.

5. Commands with questions or concerns regarding this guidance should be directed to the POCs

below:

A. Boards, Promotions, and Separations: CDR David Ratner at David.W.Ratner@uscg.mil or (202) 795-

6438.

B. Assignments: CDR Todd Behney at Todd.M.Behney@uscg.mil or (202) 795-6425.

C. OERs: CDR Kellee Nolan at Kellee.M.Nolan@uscg.mil or (202) 795-6468.

6. CAPT P. J. Dougan, Chief, Officer Personnel Management Division, CG Personnel Service Center,

sends.

7. Internet release not authorized.

Exhibit 2

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 65-2 Filed 01/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1374
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth M. Roessler, President and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Holding Company and BWAY
Corporation (the Companies) and Kevin C. Kern, Vice-President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Companies for the quarter ended December 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 13, 2008



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth M. Roessler                                     
|Kenneth M. Roessler                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer                       
|                                                            
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                                           
|Kevin C. Kern                                               
|Vice-President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David Lieberman, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: August 21, 2006


/s/ David Lieberman
---------------------------
David Lieberman
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

&&&%

&*

^ X

<"*&$&*

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

_J*RIVATE USE

RE: WR-82,242-01

a. u.

JEVANTE TREVION MITCHELL-SMITH

U.S.POSTAGE»PITNEY BOW

0001401603 JUL. 31. 201
Case 3:22-cv-01629-S   Document 31   Filed 08/11/23    Page 1 of 2   PageID 197

Case 3:22-cv-01629-S   Document 31   Filed 08/11/23    Page 2 of 2   PageID 198
#### Jack COTHRAN, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 21331.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 11, 1940.

J. Mitch Johnson, of San Saba, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is exactly the same as that discussed in Tex.Cr.App., 145 S.W.2d 885, by the same appellant in an opinion of this date. For the same reasons the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           MIDCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC.

          EXHIBIT 11.1 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three months ended March 31,
                                                     ----------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)                    1997            1996
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>             <C> 
Net loss                                              $(19,731)        $(14,500)
Weighted average shares outstanding                     15,852           15,199
Net loss per share                                    $(  1.24)        $(  0.95)
</TABLE>






















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              20
Exhibit 10.6.1

 

Execution Version

 

	
 
    	

    
	
 
    	
19411 Atrium Place   Suite 170, Houston, TX 77084
    


 

November 1, 2013

 

Peter Corsa

 

Dear Peter,

 

Garden Ridge has reviewed its vacation policy and as a result of this review is eliminating the vacation policy in favor of a Paid Time Off (PTO) Policy, which addresses both vacation and other personal time off. In order to conform your Employment Agreement to the new policy, Garden Ridge requests your consent to the following amendments to your Employment Agreement:

 

Section 2.6 (Vacation) is amended to read in its entirety: During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to two hundred (200) hours of paid time off (PTO) per calendar year, prorated for partial years in accordance with the terms of the Company’s PTO Policy.

 

Section 3.1 (Termination of Employment) is amended so as (a) to change the reference in the first sentence from “15 days” to “30 days” in both instances where “15 days” appears in that sentence, and (b) to delete clause (iii) of the second sentence of the section.

 

Please evidence your agreement to the foregoing changes by executing and returning to me a copy of this letter.

 

	
 
    	
Very truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
GARDEN RIDGE   CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Valerie Davisson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Valerie Davisson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief People Officer
    


 

Accepted and Agreed to as an amendment to the Employment Agreement between Garden Ridge Corporation and the undersigned to be effective as of the date of this letter:

 

	
/s/ Peter Corsa
    	
 
    
	
Peter Corsa
ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITY1110WestWashingtonStreet•Phoenix,Arizona85007JaniceK.Brewer(602)771-2300www.azdeq.govGovernorApril29,2013DeborahJordan_________________Director,AirDivision75HawthorneStreetSanFrancisco,CA94105Re:March12,2013FindingofIncompletenessforArizonaNewSourceReviewStateImplementationPlan(NSRSIP)SubmissionDear.-Jc5Man:TheArizonaDepartmentofEnvironmentalQualitydisagreeswiththeabove-referencedfindingofincompletenessfortheArizonaNSRSIPsubmission.Inyourletteryoustatethatthecompletenesscriteriain40C.F.R.Part51,AppendixVrequire“acleanfinalversionoftheregulations.”(Emphasisadded.)Infact,nosuchrequirementappearsinAppendixV.Instead,therelevantprovisionsareasfollows:ThesubmittalshallbeacopyoftheofficialStateregulation/documentsigned,stampedanddatedbytheappropriateStateofficialindicatingthatitisfullyenforceablebytheState.Theeffectivedateoftheregulation/documentshall,wheneverpossible,beindicatedinthedocumentitself.AppendixVdoesnotrequirethesubmissionofa“clean”copyoftheregulationorprohibitthesubmissionofaregulationwithunderlinesandstrikeoutsshowingchangesfromthepreviousversion.TheNoticeofFinalRulemaking(NFRM)publishedintheArizonaAdministrativeRegisterandprovidedinAppendixAtotheNSRSIPcontainstheofficialregulationandiseffectiveandenforceablebythestateunderA.R.S.§41-1032(A),whichisincludedinAppendixE.TheSecretaryofState’sstampedreceiptfortherules,aswellasthesignedCertificateofApprovalfromtheGovernor’sRegulatoryReviewCouncilarealsoincludedinAppendixE.Theeffectivedate,August7,2012,isspecifiedinsection3oftheNFRMatpage1553.TheAirQualityDivisionhasbegunadministeringandenforcingtheamendmentstotherulescontainedintheNFRMthatdonotconflictwiththeexistingSIP.ThesubmissionthussatisfiesAppendixV.SouthernRegionalOffice400WestCongressStreet•Suite433•Tucson,AZ85701(520)628—6733HenryR.DarwinDirectorCEVEDMAY072013PrintedonrecycledpaperPage2of2AswehaveexplainedtoyourstafftheArizonaSecretaryofStateiscurrentlyexperiencingaseverebacklogandhasbeenunabletopublishanupdatedArizonaAdministrativeCode(A.A.C.)showingwiththeamendedruleswithoutstrikeoutandunderlining.ADEQiscurrentlyescalatingthisissuewiththeSecretaryofState’sofficeinanefforttoexpediteafinalpublication.WhentheA.A.C.versionoftherulesbecomesavailable,wewillprovideacopyforRegionIX’srecords.Inthemeantime,however,therulessubmittedintheNSRSIPareofficial,effectiveandenforceable.ADEQdoesnotseeanyreason,legalorotherwise,tofindthesubmissionincompleteordelayEPAactiononthesubmission.BecauseEPAdoesnotciteanyotherreasonsfordeterminingthesubmissiontobeincomplete,ADEQbelievesthattheNSRSIPsubmissioniscompleteasamatteroflawunder42U.S.C.§7410(k)(3)asofthedateofthisletter.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorwouldliketodiscussthismatterfurther,pleasecontactmeat(602)771-2288.Sincerely,7//EricvIasseyDirector,QualityDivisionCc(viaemail):ColleenMcKaughan,EPARegionIXRogerKohn,EPARegionIX
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

Tuesday, September 19, 2023 

9:00 a.m. – 2:30 p.m. CT 

Doubletree Houston Galleria

5353 Westheimer Road 

Houston, TX 77056 

Brussels I and II

9:00 – 9:20 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks

Amy L. Solomon, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice 

Programs, U.S. Department of Justice 

Liz Ryan, Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 

Prevention (OJJDP), and Vice Chair, Coordinating Council 

9:20 – 9:30 a.m. Agency and Practitioner Introductions

9:30 – 10:15 a.m.

10:15 – 10:30 a.m.

The Opportunity Center: Community-Based Collaborations to 

Support Youth Success

Henry Gonzales, Executive Director 

Harris County Juvenile Probation 

Vanessa Ramirez, Director of Strategic Partnerships 

Harris County Juvenile Probation 

Alyssa A., Student Presenter

Break

10:30 – 11:15 a.m.

11:15 – 12:15 p.m.

The Harris County Reinvestment Fund: Financing a New Vision for 

Youth Justice

Dr. Sujeeta E. Menon, Program Director

Civic Heart Community Services (formerly Change Happens!) 

A Process for Reform: Implications and Lessons for Council 

Membership 

Liz Ryan, Moderator 

Vidhya Ananthakrishnan, Director of Youth Justice Initiatives,

Columbia Justice Lab

Danielle Lipow, Senior Associate,

Annie E. Casey Foundation 

Tiffany Echevarria, Executive Director, Collective Action for Youth

Dr. Mike Feinberg, President and Co-Founder, Texas School Venture 

Fund (TXSVF) and Career for All 

Kelly Venci Gonzalez, Senior Policy Analyst, Harris County Office of 

Safety and Justice 
Karlton Harris, Executive Director, The Forgotten Third, Inc.

Charles Rotramel, Chief Executive Officer, Houston reVision 

12:15 – 1:30 p.m. Lunch (on your own)

1:30 – 2:15 p.m. Council Business: Subcommittee Reports and Recommendations

Kellie Blue, Associate Administrator, OJJDP 

Co-Chair, Programs and Practice Subcommittee 

Sonali Nijawan, Director, AmeriCorps State and National 

Co-Chair, Programs and Practice Subcommittee 

Kristen Kracke, Associate Administrator, OJJDP 

Chair, Policy Subcommittee

2:15 – 2:30 p.m. Wrap Up and Adjournment

Optional Additional Activity – Opportunity Center Tour

2:45 – 3:00 p.m. Shuttle to The Opportunity Center Campus

6500 A Chimney Rock Rd, Houston, TX 

3:00 – 4:45 p.m. Facility Tour 

Henry Gonzales, Executive Director

Harris County Juvenile Probation 

Student Ambassador Guides 

4:45 – 5:00 p.m. Return Shuttle to Hotel

5353 Westheimer Road, Houston, TX
Maryland Department of the Environment

Mobile Sources Control Program

Cecil County MOBILE6 Modeling Emission Analysis

R.O.P Runs using the 2002-based MD-EMIS System

Cecil Area

Step Modeling Scenario VOC NOx Remarks

1 2002 RFP Base-Year Inventory 4.0 14.2 All 2002 control programs in place, 2002 VMT

2 2002 RFP Adjusted Year Inventory 5.4 16.1 CAA Off, 7.8 RVP, 1990 I/M, 2002 Eval Yr & 2002 VMT

3 2008 RFP Adjusted Year Inventory 4.7 13.9 CAA Off, 7.8 RVP, 1990 I/M, 2008 Eval Yr & 2002 VMT

4 2009 RFP Adjusted Year Inventory 4.7 13.8 CAA Off, 7.8 RVP, 1990 I/M, 2009 Eval Yr & 2002 VMT

7 2008 Projected Emission Inventory 2.3 7.9 All 2008 control programs in place

8 2009 Projected Emission Inventory 2.2 7.2 All 2009 control programs in place

9 2010 Projected Emission Inventory 2.03 6.4 All 2010 control programs in place

2008 RFP Analysis

2008 Non-Creditables (Step 2 minus Step 3) 0.7 2.2

2008 Adjstd Base-Year minus Non-Creditables 3.0 10.8

2008 Target Emissions (w/15% Reductions) 2.5 9.2

2008 Target Emissions (w/18% Reductions) 2.4 8.9

2008 Projctd Emissions (14% Projctd VMT Growth) 2.6 9.4

Note: The New MD-EMIS system with 2005 updates may show a similar trend buth the absolute numbers will be different

Prepared by: MDE's Mobile Sources Control Program, Phone (410) 537-4183 Nov. 27, 2006
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-20-00018-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Denton County

Trial Court Nos. F90-577-B, F90-578-B, F90-579-B, F91-640-B

Before Womack, Gabriel, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE DWIGHT ERVIN BROWN, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 13, 2020
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and amongWELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC,as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administratorand as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS2 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1549

BERNARD DUPLESSIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Federal

Bureau of Prisons; JOHN HAHN, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-105-AM)

Submitted: September 30, 1996 Decided: October 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Duplessis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion to compel the Immigration and Naturalization Service to

determine whether he is deportable or remove the detainer it placed

upon him. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Duplessis v. INS, No. CA-96-105-AM

(E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED