alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
******

**The Agenda**

**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting**

**Tuesday, November 18, 2014**

**U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs**

**810 Seventh Street, NW, 3rd Floor Conference Center, Washington, DC 20531**

**10:30-10:40 am 	Ceremonial Opening**

*****Eugenia Tyner-Dawson*(*Sac and Fox Nation),**Senior Advisor to the OJP AAG				for Tribal Affairs and Executive Director for the Justice Programs Council on 				Native American Affairs*

*Clayton Old Elk (Apsaalooke' Nation - Crow Nation)*

**

*Joanne Shenandoah (Iroquois), Co-Chair, Attorney General’s Advisory Committee on American Indian and Alaska Native Children Exposed to Violence*

**10:40-11:00 am	Opening Remarks**

*****Kathi L. Grasso, Designated Federal Official, Coordinating Council, Office of 				Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), U.S. Department of 				Justice*

*Mary Lou Leary, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice 				Programs (OJP), U.S. Department of Justice*

*Stuart F. Delery, Acting Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice*

****

*Robert L. Listenbee, Administrator, OJJDP, and Vice Chair, Coordinating 	Council, U.S. Department of Justice*

*Kevin K. Washburn, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of Interior*****

****

**11:00-11:30 am	Attorney General’s Advisory Committee on American Indian and Alaska Native Children Exposed to Violence:  Report Presentation**

*****Senator Byron L. Dorgan, Co-Chair, Advisory Committee*

*Anita Fineday (White Earth Band of Ojibwe), Advisory Committee*

*Valerie Davidson (Yup’ik) Advisory Committee*

*Joanne Shenandoah (Iroquois), Co-Chair, Advisory Committee*

**

**11:30 -11:55 am	Council Member Discussion of Advisory Committee’s Presentation**

**11:55-12:00 pm	Meeting Adjournment**

*Robert L. Listenbee, Administrator, OJJDP, Council Vice Chair*****

# image1.jpeg
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Harvey Beker, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn Ridgefield
Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



 /s/ Harvey Beker
 -------------------------
 Harvey Beker
 Co-Chief Executive Officer
 May 14, 2004












<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yvette Ramos, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford, 71*AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Orleans County Court, Miles, J.—attempted assault, second degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 85

    Designating March 1, 1993, through March 5, 1993, as ``National 
                           Saleswoman Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Designating March 1, 1993, through March 5, 1993, as ``National 
                           Saleswoman Week''.

Whereas half of all sales positions are filled by women, including over two-
        thirds of the retail sales force;
Whereas veteran saleswomen can teach new saleswomen effective strategies for 
        successful careers;
Whereas the average earnings of saleswomen increased by 43 percent between 1983 
        and 1990;
Whereas there are associations which help saleswomen network, learn sales 
        skills, share ideas, take advantage of job banks, and offer support to 
        each other; and
Whereas local chapters of such associations regularly hold seminars, workshops, 
        and meetings to further the professional lives of women already in sales 
        and marketing and those considering such careers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That March 1, 1993, through 
March 5, 1993, is designated as ``National Saleswoman Week''. The 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe such week with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
#### RANEY v. STATE.

No. 21611.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 30, 1941.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1941.

Wm. C. Culp and L. V. Henry, Jr., both of Gainesville, for appellant.

*811Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty to stealing five head of cattle and his punishment was assessed at the minimum of two years in the state penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts.

By motion for new trial appellant claimed that the jury, during its deliberations, received new and other testimony. The testimony relied upon to support such contention is brought forward in a bill of exception and is sufficient to support the trial court’s conclusion not only that such discussion did not happen as alleged, but that if so, it was after the jury had reached its verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant urges that notwithstanding an absence of a statement of facts his bill of exception complaining that the jury discussed other thefts which had occurred' in the county presents reversible error. We have again examined said bill and remain of opiiiion no reversible error is shown. Something was said about other cattle thefts in the county. No one mentioned appellant as being in any way connected therewith. The evidence of the jury would support a finding by the court that what little was said occurred after a verdict had been reached, and while they were waiting for the judge to receive the verdict. One juror said whatever talk occurred was based on what some witness had said during the trial concerning other cattle thefts in the county. It will readily be seen that in the absence of the statement of facts the last mentioned testimony of the juror cannot be appraised. The whole claim of improper conduct of the jury is sought to be shown by evidence which is indefinite and vague. The trial court was amply justified in refusing to disturb the verdict.

The motion -for rehearing is overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1212 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1212

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 80 percent 
 limitation on the amount of business meal and entertainment expenses 
                         which are deductible.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

 Mrs. Vucanovich introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 80 percent 
 limitation on the amount of business meal and entertainment expenses 
                         which are deductible.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 80 PERCENT LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR BUSINESS 
              MEAL AND ENTERTAINMENT EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 274 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking subsection (n) (relating to only 80 percent of 
meal and entertainment expenses allowed as deduction) and by 
redesignating subsection (o) as subsection (n).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to expenses paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of 
this Act in taxable years ending after such date.

                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0270 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-113-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
# Official Journal C 512/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 512 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6420 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 512

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6420 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 512/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10358 – ADVENT INTERNATIONAL / EURAZEO / PLANET PAYMENT GROUP) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 512/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10513 – ACCIAIERIA ARVEDI / FINARVEDI / ACCIAI SPECIALI TERNI / THYSSENKRUPP STAINLESS / THYSSENKRUPP STAINLESS TURKEY METAL SANAYI VE T) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 512/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10358 – ADVENT INTERNATIONAL / EURAZEO / PLANET PAYMENT GROUP) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 512/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10513 – ACCIAIERIA ARVEDI / FINARVEDI / ACCIAI SPECIALI TERNI / THYSSENKRUPP STAINLESS / THYSSENKRUPP STAINLESS TURKEY METAL SANAYI VE T) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 512/03 | Euro exchange rates — 17 December 2021 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 512/03

Euro exchange rates — 17 December 2021

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 512/04 | Call for submission of applications ‘European Capital of Culture’ - EAC/A04/2021 | 4 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 512/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10422 – WMG/BlackRock Group/Influence Media/The Initial Fund) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2021/C 512/04

Call for submission of applications ‘European Capital of Culture’ - EAC/A04/2021

4

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 512/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10422 – WMG/BlackRock Group/Influence Media/The Initial Fund) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
****

· In 2009, the U. S. Department of Justice released a study with alarming statistics about the safety and well- being of our nation’s children. It concluded that “60 percent of children are exposed to some form of violence, crime, or abuse, ranging from brief encounters as witnesses to serious violent episodes.”  (Children’s Exposure to Violence: A Comprehensive National Survey)

· In response to this report and to address this national crisis, the Attorney General launched the Defending Childhood Initiative in 2010.

· The Initiative included the following activities:

· DOJ awarded grants to eight sites in cities and tribal communities around the country to develop strategic plans for comprehensive community-based efforts to address and reduce children’s exposure to violence.

· The Attorney General created a National Task Force on Children’s Exposure to Violence.

· Additional resources have been dedicated to research, evaluation, public awareness and training for professional members and affiliates of national organizations. 

· The National Task Force submitted their final report to the Attorney General in 2012 with 56 recommendations.  The report is located at www.justice.gov/defendingchildhood/cev-rpt-full.pdf.

· During their public hearings, the Task Force heard that American Indian/Alaska Native children have exceptional unmet needs for services and support to prevent and respond to violence they experience.  In response, the second recommendation in their report called for the creation of a separate Task Force to focus on AI/AN Children exposed to violence.

· This new Task Force is anchored by an Advisory Committee consisting of non-federal experts in the area of AI/AN children exposed to violence and a Federal Working Group consisting of federal experts working in areas related to AI/AN children exposed to violence

· Similar to the original Task Force, this Advisory Committee was charged with investigating the issues of AI/AN children exposed to violence and making policy recommendations to Attorney General Holder on ways to address it.  The Advisory Committee convened four public hearings and focused on issues of AI/AN children exposed to violence in their homes, schools and communities.

Hearing 1:	Violence in the Home			(Bismarck, ND --- December 9, 2013)

Hearing 2:	Juvenile Justice System Response	(Scottsdale, AZ --- February 11, 2014)

Hearing 3:	Violence in the Community		(Fort Lauderdale, FL -- April 16-17, 2014)

Hearing 4:	Alaska:  Special Issues			(Anchorage, AK – June 11-12, 2014) 

Additional Materials are located at **www.justice.gov/defendingchildhood**

******

**Members of the Advisory Committee on**

**American Indian/Alaska Native Children Exposed to Violence**

# image2.jpeg

# image1.png

# image10.png
Order filed March 27, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00043-CV

____________

ALVIN ROY d/b/a ROYAL GRAFIX FINE ART, Appellant

V.

INSGROUP d/b/a BUSINESS INSURANCE GROUP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-68850

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed January 13, 2012. To date, the filing 

fee of $175.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence 

has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the Clerk of 

this court on or before April 10, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely 

pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
#### McGUIRE v. STATE.

No. 22116.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1942.

Oscar Callaway, of Comanche, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record before us is without statement of facts or bills of exception.

Reversible error is not reflected by the record.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 20 14

- NM

- 136

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,297
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,680
<PP&E>                                         153,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,918,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,937
<BONDS>                                        760,563
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          209,478
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           294
<OTHER-SE>                                     683,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,918,238
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,345
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,002
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (374)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,639)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 15 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 2 of 15 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 3 of 15 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 4 of 15 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 5 of 15 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 6 of 15 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 7 of 15 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 8 of 15 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 9 of 15 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 10 of 15 PageID 10
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 11 of 15 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 12 of 15 PageID 12
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 13 of 15 PageID 13
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 14 of 15 PageID 14
Case 4:22-cv-00873-O Document 1 Filed 09/27/22 Page 15 of 15 PageID 15
9/13/2012

National Intertribal Youth Summit 2010~ Listening to
Youth Voices

A brief history ...

2.

wipe
National

Intertabal g

‘Youth ee
“Summ,” ale

2011 ~ Youth
Taking Action
in Indian
Country

2012 ~ Young Leaders
Shaping Their Communities

Overview of 2012 NIYS sos Sean “7

UT xR ae



9/13/2012

EA
USDA a
# C_2004251EN.01002702.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/27

---

Action brought on 22 July 2004 by Cristóbal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos and Antonio Parras Rosa against Council of the European Union

(Case T-297/04)

(2004/C 251/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 July 2004 by Cristóbal Gallego Martínez, Benito García Burgos and Antonio Parras Rosa, residing in Jaen (Spain), represented by José Francisco Vázquez Medina, of the Jaen Bar.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul ipso jure Article 1(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 864/04 |
| --- | --- |

—

annul ipso jure Article 1(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 864/04

| — | reserve its decision on costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve its decision on costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical with those put forward in Case T-295/04.

---