alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# AGENCY: 

International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION: 

Revised schedule for the subject investigations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE: 

Date of commission action. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Haines (202-205-3200), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

                    On December 1, 1999, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the final phase of the subject investigations (                    **Federal Register**64 FR 67307, December 1, 1999). The Commission received notification of the Department of Commerce's final determinations in these investigations on January 27, 2000. The Commission, therefore, is revising its schedule to conform with Commerce's notification.                 

The Commission's new schedule for the investigations is as follows: the Commission will release the staff report to parties on February 18, the final release of information will be on February 25; and final party comments are due on February 29. 

For further information concerning these investigations see the Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). 

Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules. 

By order of the Commission.

Issued: February 2, 2000. 

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-3018 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18
(Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of CCF Holding Company (the Company), hereby certifies as follows:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the Report),
which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of November, 2003.



/s/    David B. TurnerDavid B. Turner, Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David Lieberman, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The  registrant's other certifying  officer and I are  responsible  for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2010
 
 /s/David Lieberman


David Lieberman
 Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATE OF THE


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


FNBH BANCORP, INC.





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):





I, Ronald L. Long, President and Chief Executive Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:





(1)  The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;





(2)  The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp, Inc.




FNBH BANCORP, INC.Date: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Ronald L. LongRonald L. LongIts:
President and Chief Executive Officer





The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18
(Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of CCF Holding Company (the small business issuer), hereby certifies as follows:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the small business
issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small business issuer.



Dated this 16th day of August, 2004.



/s/ David B. TurnerDavid B. Turner, Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### MAG Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee December 4, 2014 

## 2013 Unpaved Roads Inventory for the Maricopa County PM

- 10 Nonattainment Area

## Background

 MAG Regional Council

- On May 23, 2007, the MAG Regional Council approved additional items for the Suggested List of Measures to Reduce PM

- 10. One of these measures was that MAG would develop an unpaved roads inventory for the PM

- 10
Nonattainment Area.



###  Primary Use of Inventory

- The unpaved roads inventory will be used to measure progress in eliminating unpaved roads.



###  Initial Inventory

– Initial unpaved roads inventory was completed in November 2009.

### Year 2013 Unpaved Roads
Data from MAG Member Agencies MAG CMAQ and TIP Paving

Data for Year
2013

Analysis of Aerial Imagery to Identify Changes to Unpaved Roads. Draft Maps Developed by MAG GIS staff. Preliminary 2013 Unpaved Roads Inventory (updated by MAG GIS staff)

Additional Unpaved Roads Data Received from MAG Member Agencies after Review of Draft Maps.

2013 Unpaved Roads Inventory (updated by MAG GIS staff)

## Unpaved Roads Not Included in Inventory

 Alleys



###  Agricultural Roads



###  Canal Roads



###  Closed Unpaved Roads



###  Easements



###  Restricted Access Roads



###  Utility Roads

## Year 2013 Unpaved Roads Summary

 Public Unpaved Roads (miles)

• Nonattainment Area Total = 381

• Cities & Towns = 119

• Maricopa County

– Unincorp. = 52

• Pinal County

– Unincorp. = 9

• Federal Land = 162

• Tribal Communities/Nations = 39

 Private Unpaved Roads (miles)

• Nonattainment Area Total = 998

• Cities & Towns = 185

• Maricopa County

– Unincorp. = 740

• Pinal County

– Unincorp. = 23

• Federal Land = 5

• Tribal Communities/Nations = 45

 

### Total Unpaved Roads (miles) = 1,379

## Change in Unpaved Roads (November 2009

– December 2013)

 Public Unpaved Roads

• Decrease of 232 miles

• Paving of public unpaved roads.

• Closing of public unpaved roads.

• Reclassification of public unpaved roads (e.g., actually private).

• Blockage of public unpaved roads.



###  Private Unpaved Roads

• Decrease of 273 miles

• Paving of private unpaved roads.

• Reclassification of private unpaved roads (e.g.,
some farm roads and canal roads had been classified as private unpaved roads).

### Regional Map Showing Public Unpaved Roads

This image cannot currently be displayed.

### Regional Map Showing Private Unpaved Roads

This image cannot currently be displayed.

### For more information
Contact: Randy Sedlacek (602) 254

- 6300

rsedlacek@azmag.gov This image cannot currently be displayed. This image cannot currently be displayed. This image cannot currently be displayed.
----

            DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT         

of 21 April 2004         

concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2002 financial year — Section IV — Court of Justice

(2004/724/EC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet for the 2002 financial year (I5-0034/2003 — C5-0088/2004),

having regard to the Annual Report of the European Court of Auditors for the 2002 financial year, together with the replies of the institutions (C5-0583/2003) (1),

having regard to the statement of assurance by the European Court of Auditors, pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty, as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions (C5-0583/2003),

having regard to the Council's recommendation of 9 March 2003 (C5-0145/2004),

having regard to Article 272(10) and Article 275 of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 22(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 (2) and Article 50 of the Financial Regulation of 25 June 2002 (3),

having regard to Rule 93a of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A5-0228/2004),

The Secretary-General

Julian PRIESTLEY            

The President

Pat COX            

----

(1)OJ C 286, 28.11.2003, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 356, 31.12.1977, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

----

            RESOLUTION         

of the European Parliament containing the comments accompanying the decision concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2002 financial year — Section IV — Court of Justice

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet for the 2002 financial year (I5-0034/2003 — C5-0088/2004),

having regard to the Annual Report of the European Court of Auditors for the 2002 financial year, together with the replies of the institutions (C5-0583/2003) (1),

having regard to the statement of assurance by the European Court of Auditors, pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty, as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions (C5-0583/2003),

having regard to the Council's recommendation of 9 March 2004 (C5-0145/2004),

having regard to Article 272(10) and Article 275 of the EC Treaty,

having regard to Article 22(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 (2) and Article 50 of the Financial Regulation of 25 June 2002 (3),

having regard to Rule 93a of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A5-0228/2004),

Non-official use of official cars

Increases in remuneration as a result of weightings

----

(1)OJ C 286, 28.11.2003, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 356, 31.12.1977, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ C 109, 14.4.2000, p. 1.

(5)  Letter of 6 June 2003 to the chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control.

(6)  Resolution of 8 April 2003, paragraph 6 (OJ L 148, 16.6.2003, p. 46).

----
Case 4:22-cr-00287-O Document 27 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 42
Case 4:22-cr-00287-O Document 27 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 43
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R.L. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Gregory R. L. Smith
| | Gregory R. L. Smith    
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | May 12, 2011           

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF T

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS,

HAOQIANG FU aflrla Michael Fu

s

s

$

$

$

CASE NO.:

REPORT AI\D REC OMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

HAOQIANG FU aflrla Michael Fu , by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125

F.3d26l (5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of

guilty to Count I of the l-Count Information, liled on October 1312022. After cautioning and examining

Defendant Haoqiang Fu a/k/a Michael Fu, under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule

ll, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is

supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I

therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that Defendant Haoqiang Fu a/k/a Michael

Fu, be adjudged guilty of Sale of Unregistered Securities, in violation of 15 USC $ 77e(c) and 77x, and

have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge.

tr / The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

V The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 3la3(aXl ) unless the Court finds by clear

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released.

{ The Government does not oppose release.

D 1 The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

d I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to

any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or

(c).

tr The Govemment opposes release.

tr The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

D If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 3la3(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there

is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly

shown under $ 31a5(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released.

Signed October 18, 2022.

TRMA CARRILLO RAMI

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXlXB).

tJ.s. l)ls'f tl l(:T (:Ot,r rt

\oRTt I llltN l)ls]'ttl('T olt Tlx^s

T.-ILED

6CT 1 B 2022

Case 3:22-cr-00352-K Document 33 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
Rivero, Maria (OSn 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

DonPevsner@aol.com 

Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:36 PM 

Rivero, Maria (OST) 

NEW TEXT FOR DOCKET DOT-OST-2012-0109-00356 (SUBSTITUTE FOR PRIOR TEXT) 

(1 )The anonymous Correspondence Motion in this Docket, Item DOT-OST -2012-0109-0033, is a transparent attempt to 

smear the Petitioner/Complainant while conveniently requesting DOT to dismiss the Petition/Complaint at issue without 

considering its merits, on totally-spurious grounds. As part of this scurrilous strategy, the author has not only neglected to 

provide his own name, but also that of his employer (most probably Delta Air Lines, Inc.). If he is in fact a lawyer for 

Delta, he is following the old and contemptible maxim of: 'When you have the law on your side, argue it. When you have 

the facts on your side, argue them. When you have neither, attack your opponent." For the record, in reply to this 

disgraceful Correspondence filing: 

(a)Petitioner/Complainant has been a Member of The Florida Bar (#115778) since June, 1969. It is true that his · 

membership status is currently Inactive, but only because he no longer resides in Florida (since January, 2005) and no 

longer practices law there. 

(b)He is totally entitled to represent himself as the lawyer that he is, and has been for 43 years at this writing. The 

alleged precedents cited in the anonymous smear filing are clearly not applicable to his actions in this Docket. 

(c)He does not need lectures in civility from an anonymous Commenter who appears to be nothing more than a tool for 

an unscrupulous airline. Delta Air Lines' Managing Director-Government Affairs and Associate General Counsel, 

Alexander Van der Bellen, has directly implied in Delta's Answer to Petitioner's Petition for Rulemaking and Third-Party 

Complaint that Petitioner/Complainant was trying to blackmail Delta in order to receive a paltry $150 airline ticket change 

penalty waiver, rather than attempting to cure a manifest industry wrong as practiced by Delta. If DOT believes that he 

has been inordinately intemperate in his prior language, in view of this rank insult to his character, let DOT say so 

to Petitioner/Complainant itself. Petitioner/Complainant's 40-year record of pro bono publico practice at the CAB and 

DOT is not for sale to Delta (or to anyone else) for any amount on Earth, let alone $150. 

(d)lt is hereby requested that DOT require the anonymous Correspondence author to disclose his identity, and that of 

his employer, at once. Otherwise, the Motion should be promptly stricken from this Docket. 

(e)Then, for obvious reasons, DOT should deny the Motion at issue. 

1
UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

TINITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintitr,

NO. 1:22-CR-063-01-H

STORMIE CHYANNE HARRIS,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TTIE UNTTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bxl), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate ludge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the court. Accordingly, the court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the court's scheduling order.

.IAMES WE YHENDRIX

UNITED ST TES DISTRICT JUDGE

SO ORDERED.

DatedJanuary V,rorr.

Case 1:22-cr-00063-H-BU Document 25 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52