alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-410-000]

      ( print page 71097)    
Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Consumers Energy Company (Consumers) tendered for filing a Facilities Agreement between Consumers and SEI Michigan, L.L.C. [SEI] (Agreement). Under the Agreement, Consumers is to provide electrical connection facilities between a generating plant to be built by SEI and Consumers transmission system. Consumers requested that the Agreement be allowed to become effective October 4, 2000.

Copies of the filing were served upon SEI and the Michigan Public Service Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before November 30, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30356 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JASON GARDNER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 317 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 19th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 32.2



US Oncology, Inc



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Bruce D. Broussard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce D. Broussard                      
|Bruce D. Broussard                          
|Chief Financial Officer of US Oncology, Inc.
|                                            
|May 10, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-035]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

November 22, 2000.

    Take notice that on November 17, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing an FT-A Agreement and three 
letter agreements (Negotiated Rate Arrangement). Tennessee requests 
that the Commission approve the Negotiated Rate Arrangement effective 
December 1, 2000.
    Tennessee states that the Negotiated Rate Arrangement reflects a 
negotiated rate transaction between Tennessee and Eastman Chemical 
Company for transportation under Rate Schedule FT-A.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http//www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30345 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 

5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, Ca 94553 (925) 228-9500 • www.centralsan.org 

January 30, 2009 

Email: rcra-docket@epa.gov 

Attention Docket 10 No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

Identification of Non-Hazardous Materials 

That Are Solid Waste 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

FAX: (925) 689-1232 

JAMES M. KELLY 

Gelleral Mallager 

KENTON L. ALM 

COl/llsel for the District 

(5/0) 808-2000 

ELAINE R. BOEHME 

Secretary of the Dis/rict 

ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING - IDENTIFICATION OF 

NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS THAT ARE SOLID WASTE - DOCKET 10 

NO. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) would like to thank the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the opportunity to comment and provide input 

on the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). Furthermore, we 

acknowledge and compliment the EPA on its efforts to clarify and resolve the issues 

regarding the appropriate applicability of the Clean Air Act (CAA), Sections 112 and 129. 

In particular, we support your approach to explore regulatory alternatives, which 

1) maximize the usefulness of secondary materials, 2) reduce or eliminate discarded 

material, and 3) conserve energy and reduce harmful air emissions. 

CCCSD provides wastewater collection and secondary wastewater treatment for 

approximately 450,000 people in Contra Costa County. The treatment facility, located in 

Martinez, California, has an average dry weather flow (ADWF) capacity of 53.8 million 

gallons per day. A process flow schematic of the treatment facility is shown in 

Attachment 1. As can be seen from the schematic, the sewage sludge is incinerated in a 

multiple-hearth incinerator. The recovered heat from the incinerator produces steam, 

which drives a turbine/blower that supplies oxygen to the secondary process. The sludge 

is converted to ash, which is then combined with other products to produce a 

commercially available soil amendment product. 

N:\POSUP\Regulatory\2009\RCRA Comment Letter.doc @ Recycled Paper
Case 3:22-cr-00417-E Document 61 Filed 10/29/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 130
Case 6:22-cv-00031-H-BU   Document 64   Filed 08/03/23    Page 1 of 2   PageID 782

Case 6:22-cv-00031-H-BU   Document 64   Filed 08/03/23    Page 2 of 2   PageID 783
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132056 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132056 

 COA: 267930 

St. Joseph CC: 04-012199-FH

STEVEN LEE KLINGER, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Michael Anthony Mendoza
Photograph of Michael Anthony MendozaMichael Anthony Mendoza
Michael Anthony Mendoza is the Director of Advocacy and a Community Organizer at the Anti-Recidivism Coalition and has successfully worked with partner organizations to center the voices of currently and formerly incarcerated Californians in the service of passing legislation to help end mass incarceration and improve public safety for all. At 15, he was transferred to adult court and sentenced to 15 years to life in prison. While incarcerated, Mendoza turned his life around and focused on healing and education to become the person he wanted to be. Changes in state law gave Mendoza the opportunity to demonstrate that he matured into a healthy and prosocial adult. Mendoza was released in 2014 after 17 years of incarceration. He immediately began advocating to reform California’s juvenile and criminal justice systems to implement a vision for a new justice system grounded in healing, health, and opportunity for growth. The California state legislature has recognized Mendoza for his advocacy and impact on the juvenile and criminal justice system and reentry.

Mendoza earned a B.A. in political science from San Francisco State University and serves on various boards and committees in support of safer communities, and a more just and equitable society.
  
Date Created: June 22, 2023
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
#### Ben TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 21564.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 12, 1941.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for the theft of chickens; the punishment assessed is a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for five days.

Since his appeal was perfected, the appellant has filed a written request, verified •by his affidavit, asking the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Lieberman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 18, 2002


__________________________
David Lieberman
President



<PAGE>
Case 4:22-cr-00296-Y Document 21 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 41
Case 4:22-cr-00296-Y Document 21 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 42
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 31 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-135219) and Amendment No. 393 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.


















/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 1, 2015
#### FOSTER v. STATE.

No. 22250.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 25, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1943.

Leon D. Lusk, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in County Court at Law No. 2, Harris County, upon a charge of keeping a bawdy house and assessed a fine of two hundred dollars and twenty days in jail, from which she appeals.

The record is before us with two bills of exception which cannot be considered because each is multifarious. Each bill presents some kind of objection to testimony given by about six different witnesses and is otherwise fatally defective.

There is no contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction and we find nothing requiring further consideration.

The judgment in the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which she asserts that we erred in several respects in our original opinion: First, in holding the evidence sufficient to sustain her conviction; and second, in declining to consider her bills of exception. These matters were all considered by us on the original submission of the case. However, in view of her serious contention we have again carefully reviewed the record in the light of her motion but see no good reason why we should change our views as expressed in the original opinion.

Believing that the case was properly disposed of, the motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
1

The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3377

___________

Leslie Isben Rogge, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: August 22, 2002

 Filed: August 27, 2002

___________

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Isben Rogge appeals the District Court’s1

 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion, which he filed in 2001, more than three years after his conviction

became final. On appeal, Rogge argues the District Court erred in finding his § 2255

motion was successive and unauthorized because his prior filing was found to be a
-2-

mislabeled 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He argues he is entitled to relief on his motion

because a defect in the indictment deprived the District Court of federal jurisdiction,

and his trial counsel was ineffective.

We need not reach the more complicated issue of successiveness because the

record plainly demonstrates that Rogge’s motion was filed well beyond the one-year

limitations period, see 28 U.S.C. § 2255, with no applicable exception, see United

States v. Cotton, 122 S. Ct. 1781, 1785 (2002) (“[D]efects in an indictment do not

deprive a court of its power to adjudicate a case.”).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment dismissing Rogge’s motion.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Friday, September 12, 2008 Meeting September 12, 2008
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC
9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance

September 12, 2008 Meeting Materials

**Presenter/Panelist Bios:**

Bios**Panel Presentation: What Challenges Are Boys Facing, and What Opportunities Exist to Address Those Challenges?:**

What Challenges Are Boys Facing, and What Opportunities Exist to Address Those Challenges
	Playing with Anger: Engaging The Emotional Lives of Black Boys in Schools
	Success of Ecologically-Based Interventions: Implications for Optimizing Developmental Outcomes for Boys and Young Men
	Report on Juvenile Justice Collaboration for Treatment Improvement
	Council Recommendations**Update on New Orleans**

YouthBuild USA
	The Corps Network
  
Date Published: September 12, 2008
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 pm, Thursday, December 7, 2000.

# PLACE:

Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Hearing open to the Public at 2:00 pm.

# PURPOSE:

In conjunction with the quarterly meeting of OPIC's Board of Directors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

Procedure: Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 PM, December 6, 2000. The notice must include the individual's name, organization, address, and telephone number, and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented.

Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request to participate an opportunity to be heard.

Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 PM, December 6, 2000. Such statements must be typewritten, double-spaced and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.

Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda for the hearing identifying speakers, setting forth the subject on which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for each presentation. The agenda will be available at the hearing.

A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's Corporate Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR  INFORMATION:

Information on the hearing may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 408-0297, or via email at cdown@opic.gov.

Dated: November 20, 2000.

Connie M. Downs,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30030 Filed 11-20-00; 3:03 pm]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-M