alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                          20,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  342,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               458,532
<PP&E>                                         259,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,286,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          209,465
<BONDS>                                        300,729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           909
<OTHER-SE>                                     737,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,286,832
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,502
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,115
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
PAUL J. ZIMMER 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

11324 Flint Rock Drive 

Grand Ledge, Ml 48837 

Tel: (517) 281-7559 

February 14,2012 

•.^ Ri;',!EMT OF 

:.SPOR]AT!ON 

m ^ 2 P 2^ 31 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W-120140 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Sun Country slot exemption Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

Dear Sirs: 

I write in support of Sun Country's petition to retain a gate slot at Reagan National 

Airport for its daily nonstop flight to and from Lansing, Michigan. I have taken and will take 

this flight. It is ovir only nonstop flight to Washington and is much more convenient and efficient 

than connecting through Detroit. The last year has proven a real need for this flight by both our 

state government and regional businesses. 

An additional benefit of this flight is that it has also given us, for the fiirst time in many 

years, a nonstop flight to and from Minneapolis that competes with Delta. I also regularly use 

this flight, which has greatly reduced the cost of traveling to Miimeapolis. If Lansing loses its 

flight to Washington, it will almost certainly lose the flight to Minneapolis as well as it is the 

same route. 

Loss of these flights would be a serious blow to Lansing. I urge you to grant Sun 

Country's petition, so that we can retain these flights. 

Very truly yours, 

Paul J. Zimmer
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 1:00 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Subject: Clean and Redline FRN Files--EO12866 Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM FRN

Attachments: EO12866_Tier_3_2060-AQ86_FRM_FRN_20140228_redline.doc; EO12866_Tier_3_2060-

AQ86_FRM_FRN_20140228.doc

Attached are the clean and redlined files for the preamble and regs. 

RIA to come separately.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1029 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1029

 To provide for an increase in personnel of the Border Patrol, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

Mr. Beilenson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for an increase in personnel of the Border Patrol, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN PERSONNEL OF THE BORDER PATROL.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to provide for an authorized personnel level of 6,600 for the 
border patrol of the United States.

                                 <all>
```
I 

I 

1 I 

l 

I 

I 

j 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Mr. Jerry Mallot 

President, JAXUSA Partnership 

3 Independent Drive 

Jacksonville, FL 32202 

Dear Mr. Mallot: 

Assistant Secretary 

JUN 25 2014 

'' · .. -·. 

' :_!;l~od New Jersey Avenue. SE 

'wa'~hington, oc 20590 

Thank you for your letter to Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx, supporting the 

application of JetBlue Airways (JetBlue) for two within-perimeter slot exemptions at Ronald 

Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). JetBlue proposes to serve Jacksonville 

International Airport in Jacksonville, Florida, with one nonstop round trip per day from DCA. 

Secretary Foxx asked that I respond to you on his behalf. 

We received JetBlue's application on March 25. Other timely applications were received from 

American Airlines, proposing one nonstop round trip to Islip, New York; from Southwest 

Airlines, proposing one nonstop round trip to Kansas City, Missouri; and from People Express 

Airlines, proposing one nonstop round trip serving, on a seasonal basis, Myrtle Beach, South 

Carolina (April'-October) and West Palm Beach, Florida (October-April). 

As the matter is still pending, I cannot comment on the merits of the points raised in your letter. 

However, I can assure you that all applications received by the U.S. Department of 

Transportation will be given due and careful consideration. 

The Department's action on this matter is being administered through a public docket, which 

allows all interested parties the opportunity to comment. Following our normal practice, I am 

placing a copy of your letter and this response in docket number DOT-OST-2000-7182. 

I appreciate your interest in this matter. 

S1 0-140407-029 

Sincerely yours, 

Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 
E 

For Regional Economic Development 

March 31, 2014 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: JetBiue Airways DCA-JAX Application, Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

On behalf of JAXUSA Partnership, a Division of the Jacksonville Regional Chamber of Commerce, 

I am writing to express my strong s_upport for JetBiue's application to offer competitive service from 

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) to Jacksonville International Airport (JAX) in Florida. 

JetBiue's new DCA-JAX service will provide low fare, high quality service between the capital's 

convenient, downtown airport and Jacksonville- a market that today is served by only one carrier. By 

offering lower fares and by providing exceptional, award winning service, JetBiue will provide new 

competition for the many travelers between Jacksonville and Washington each year. 

I urge you to approve JetBiue Airways' application to provide competitive nonstop service 

between JAX and DCA. 

3 Independent Drive Jacksonville, Florida 3 2202 Office 904.366.6600 www.jaxusa.or·g 

DUVAL FLAGLER i'Lt.I.SSAU 

Fax 904.353.6343 

PUTi'J fvl ST. JOHNS
#### Nanette Cristantiello, Respondent, v Stephan F. Cristantiello, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The court did not err in admitting evidence concerning defendant’s conduct because that evidence was not introduced to establish fault, but to show that defendant had not surreptitiously entered the premises to remove household goods.

Defendant contends that the credit card debt incurred by plaintiff during defendant’s four-month absence from the marital residence should be the separate debt of plaintiff because defendant provided in excess of $11,700 for living expenses of plaintiff and the children during his absence. The record, however, does not support defendant’s contention that he provided living expenses for plaintiff and the children during his absence.

Defendant contends that because of his disability, he should have been awarded maintenance. Having failed to raise this issue before the trial court, he is precluded from raising it on appeal. We have reviewed the other issues raised by defendant concerning equitable distribution and we find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, *944Cayuga County, Corning, J.—divorce.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas C. Sandvig, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                  /s/ Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  November 12, 2004
#### Ex parte MARKS.

No. 21853.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 22, 1941.

W. R. Parker and Byron Matthews, both of Fort Worth, and J. FÍ Murray, of Ponca City, Okl., for appellant.

Forrester Hancock, Crim. Dist. Atty., and Fred L. Wilson, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., both of Waxahachie, and Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Relator was heretofore convicted of a conspiracy to commit theft, and by the court sentenced to serve five years in the penitentiary in accordance with the verdict of the jury. Upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial, the court fixed his bond on appeal at the sum of $8,000. He sued out a writ of habeas corpus requesting that the court reduce the amount of such bail, and upon the trial court’s refusal to do so, the matter is before us on appeal.

Under the facts it is shown that relator is a gypsy, and he and his wife were apprehended in the State of Oregon charged with a conspiracy to steal $7,749 from one E. W. Alexander in Ellis County. It also appears from the record that some person had placed the sum of $5,000 in a certain bank to be paid to Mr. Alexander provided relator and his wife were enlarged from custody at their trials for such offense.

It was alleged in the application herein that relator was unable to make bond in the amount of $8,000, but no effort is shown by the testimony to make any such bond. The witness who testified relative to such matters merely testified that he did not believe relator could make an $8,000 bond, but could possibly make a $4,500 or $5,000 bond. It also is shown that some one had made a deposit of $5,000 in a bank relative to the liberation of relator. There was no showing of any effort to make the herein demanded bond of $8,000. Relator is also shown to have been a person of wandering habits, and that he had been extradited on this particular matter from the State of Oregon, quite a distance from the scene of this alleged offense.

We think - it incumbent upon relator to have shown an effort to make the required bond before he was entitled to any consideration relative to a reduction of such amount. This he is not shown to have done. Under the circumstances we do not think he is entitled to any relief hereunder. See Ex parte Howell, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 305, 120 S.W.2d 264, 265; Ex parte McDaniel, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 539, 258 S.W. 1057; Ex parte Turner, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 151, 45 S.W.2d 1017; Ex parte Stanton, 121 Tex.Cr.R. 144, 51 S.W.2d 713; Ex parte Burleson, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 75, 109 S.W.2d 200.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 222 (Wednesday, November 18, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 72029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29370]

[[Page 72029]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 171

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0183; FRL-9936-82]
RIN 2070-AJ20

Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators; Extension of 
Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a proposed rule in the Federal Register of August 
24, 2015, concerning certification of applicators of restricted use 
pesticides. This document extends the comment period for 30 days, from 
November 23, 2015 to December 23, 2015. The comment period is being 
extended to provide additional time for commenters to prepare their 
responses.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2011-0183, must be received on or before December 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in 
the Federal Register document of August 24, 2015 (80 FR 51356) (FRL-
9931-83).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Arling, Field and External 
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; 
telephone number: (703) 308-5891; email address: 
arling.michelle@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register document of August 24, 2015. 
In that document, comments were required to be submitted by November 
23, 2015. EPA is hereby extending the comment period to December 23, 
2015.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register 
document of August 24, 2015. If you have questions, consult the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 171

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Certified applicator, Commercial applicator, Indian Country, Indian 
Tribes, Noncertified applicator, Pesticides and pests, Private 
applicator, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Restricted use 
pesticides.

    Dated: November 10, 2015.
James Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-29370 Filed 11-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

ERIC JACKSON, et. al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, 

Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 4:22-cv-0825-P 

PROPOSED ORDER 

Before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to withdraw Johnny Walker as counsel 

for Defendants. For the reasons stated in the motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is 

GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that Johnny Walker is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record for 

Defendants in this matter. 

It is SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

MARK T. PITTMAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 89-1 Filed 06/29/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1953
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023243EN.01000901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/9 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11033 – ADOBE / FIGMA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 243/06)

1.

On 30 June 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023243EN.01000901-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Adobe Inc. (‘Adobe’, United States of America), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Figma, Inc. (‘Figma’, United States of America). |

Adobe will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Figma.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

The concentration has been referred to the Commission by Austria pursuant to Article 22(3) of the Merger Regulation. The referral was subsequently joined by Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Adobe: global software company offering, among others, creative design software and an interactive product design tool, i.e., Adobe XD, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Figma: provider of a web-based collaborative tool for interactive product design, Figma Design, as well as a whiteboarding tool, FigJam. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11033 – ADOBE / FIGMA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | European Commission |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Directorate-General for Competition |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Merger Registry |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023243EN.01000901-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
2006_Shelby_RoadTypeDistributio

sourceTypeIDroadTypeID roadTypeVMTFraction

11 1 0

11 2 0.013768

11 3 0.072177

11 4 0.291657

11 5 0.622399

21 1 0

21 2 0.013768

21 3 0.072177

21 4 0.291657

21 5 0.622399

31 1 0

31 2 0.013768

31 3 0.072177

31 4 0.291657

31 5 0.622399

32 1 0

32 2 0.013768

32 3 0.072177

32 4 0.291657

32 5 0.622399

41 1 0

41 2 0.022911

41 3 0.057519

41 4 0.4469

41 5 0.47267

42 1 0

42 2 0.022911

42 3 0.057519

42 4 0.4469

42 5 0.47267

43 1 0

43 2 0.022911

43 3 0.057519

43 4 0.4469

43 5 0.47267

51 1 0

51 2 0.022911

51 3 0.057519

51 4 0.4469

51 5 0.47267

52 1 0

52 2 0.022911

52 3 0.057519

52 4 0.4469

52 5 0.47267

53 1 0

53 2 0.022911

53 3 0.057519

53 4 0.4469

Page 1
2006_Shelby_RoadTypeDistributio

53 5 0.47267

54 1 0

54 2 0.022911

54 3 0.057519

54 4 0.4469

54 5 0.47267

61 1 0

61 2 0.076991

61 3 0.048275

61 4 0.707182

61 5 0.167551

62 1 0

62 2 0.076991

62 3 0.048275

62 4 0.707182

62 5 0.167551

Page 2
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Phillip S. Dingle, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant, PlanVista Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)    Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize, and report financial information; and



(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|Date:    August 12, 2003 |  | /s/ Phillip S. Dingle               
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|                         |  |                                     
|                         |  | Phillip S. Dingle                   
|                         |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:22-cv-00986-S-BH     Document 64     Filed 07/26/22      Page 1 of 1     PageID 1084