alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Complaint to U.S. Deparnnent ofTransportation- cityofpage.org- Sm... https:I/24.119.59.214/MainJfrmMessage.aspx?popup=true&folder=l...

I 

### of I 

## Complaintto U.S. Department ofTransportation Tue 1/14/20147:58AM From: lrby Randall (Randy**T~:** 

### cityclerk@cityofpage.org ( c1tyclerk@cityorpage.org) 

## ·- ..- 0A**"::11~ ·,~:1**  

### l "":\ _) :....:: u



## .......................................................................................................................-.................................................**~~-=-~**

## ...:.·.:..**~.~**

## ....: ...:.............................................................. Page City Clerk,

Attached is a duplicate ofthe online complaint I filed with the United States • !•-. 

### Department ofTransportation. Please distribute to the Page City Council, Page City Manager and the Page Airport Board members.

Thanks, Randy lrby


## l]{arufy

## J. I

## r6y Sr. 

## tfraini1liJ}lna[yst :Navajo generating Station

1/14/2014 8:08AM 

# ·-Complaint filed with the United States Department ofTransportation:

I live in a remote town in northern Arizona. We have the privilege of a small airline to help us get to and from major cities like Phoenix and Denver for healthcare and connections to other major airlines, etc. The airline that provides that service is Great Lakes Aviation. In 2013 my wife, I and other family members used them for travel. In total, my family used them approximately 12 times. The use for my wife is primarily medical since she was diagnosed with cancer and is receiving cancer treatments in Phoenix. Ofthe approximate 12 times we attempted to use Great Lakes, more than halfofthese fights were either canceled or were delayed by an hour or more. One flight was 4 hours late only to take off and return without completing the flight. On one occasion, my wife missed part ofour daughter's**w~dding** in Denver because the flight was canceled. I had a flight canceled the day before it was to fly. I was forced to fly a day early, miss work and use vacation. Furthermore, since my wife is being treate·d for cancer, we have had to make some quick adjustments to make sure she was able to make her treatment in Phoenix. Delays and cancelations of Great Lakes flights are regular and epidemic. We never book a flight with Great Lakes unless we have a backup plan. Sometimes this means burning valuable vacation and time away from work. This makes travel with Great Lakes very expensive for my family and our community. We appreciate the convenience that an airline brings to our community, however Great Lakes is not providing reliable service or that convenience. Great Lakes' only redemptio!"' are the friendly folks at the Page terminal. If our community can't rely on Great lakes Aviation to provide timely regular service, then our community is worse off than having no airline at all.
Randy lrby**~·'· ~** 

### ..**-.~-;** =:J

0 ..D
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY 

The Honorable Paul D. Ryan 

Speaker 

U.S. House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Speaker: 

July 28, 2017 

I am writing to notify you, as required under 5 U.S.C. § 8348(1)(2), of my determination that, by 

reason of the statutory debt limit, I will continue to be unable to fully invest the portion of the 

Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF) not immediately required to pay 

beneficiaries. I have determined that a "debt issuance suspension period," previously determined 

to last until July 28, 2017, will continue through September 29, 2017. As a result, the Treasury 

Department will continue to suspend additional investments of amounts credited to, and redeem 

an additional portion of the investments held by, the CSRDF, as authorized by law. 

By law, the CSRDF will be made whole once the debt limit is increased. Federal retirees and 

employees will be unaffected by these actions. 

Based upon our available information, I believe that it is critical that Congress act to increase the 

nation's borrowing authority by September 29, 2017. I urge Congress to act promptly on this 

important matter. 

Sincerely, 

Steven T. Mnuchin 

Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader 

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader 

The Honorable Charles E. Schumer, Senate Democratic Leader 

cc: The Honorable Kevin Brady, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means 

The Honorable Richard Neal, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and Means 

The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance 

The Honorable Ron Wyden, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance 

All other Members of the 115th Congress
Exhibit 33.2





MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT
OF COMPLIANCE



Management of the Trust & Securities Services department of
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the “Company”) is responsible
for assessing the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
to determine which criteria are applicable to the Company in respect of the servicing platform described below. Management has
determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:



Platform: The Honda Auto Receivables 2013-3 Owner Trust asset-backed
securities transaction and the Honda Auto Receivables 2015-2 Owner Trust asset-backed securities transaction (the “Platform”).



Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d), except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii),
1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company
performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”). With respect to the Platform, servicing
criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.



Period: Year ended March 31, 2017 (the “Period”).



With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s
management provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



1. The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the
Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.



2. The Company’s management has assessed the Company’s
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period. In performing this assessment, management used the
criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.



3. Based on such assessment as of and for the Period, the Company
has complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of and for the Period.











| | DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| | By:                                 
| |                                     
| |                                     
| |                                     
| | DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
| |                                     
| | By:                                 
| |                                     
| |                                     



Dated: April 27, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 98

   To authorize the National Committee of American Airmen Rescued by 
General Mihailovich to establish a memorial in the District of Columbia 
                            or its environs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

 Mr. Crane (for himself, Mr. Dornan, and Mr. Ackerman) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize the National Committee of American Airmen Rescued by 
General Mihailovich to establish a memorial in the District of Columbia 
                            or its environs.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The National Committee of American Airmen Rescued 
by General Mihailovich is authorized to establish a memorial on Federal 
land in the District of Columbia or its environs to honor General Draza 
Mihailovich.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with the Act 
entitled ``An Act to provide standards for placement of commemorative 
works on certain Federal lands in the District of Columbia and its 
environs, and for other purposes'', approved November 14, 1986 (40 
U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

    The National Committee of American Airmen Rescued by General 
Mihailovich shall be solely responsible for acceptance of contributions 
for, and payment of the expenses of, the establishment of the memorial. 
No Federal funds may be used to pay any expense of the establishment of 
the memorial.

SEC. 3. DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.

    If, upon payment of all expenses of the establishment of the 
memorial (including the maintenance and preservation amount provided 
for in section 8(b) of the Act referred to in section 1(b)), or upon 
expiration of the authority for the memorial under section 10(b) of 
such Act, there remains a balance of funds received for the 
establishment of the memorial, the National Committee of American 
Airmen Rescued by General Mihailovich shall transmit the amount of the 
balance to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in the account 
provided for in section 8(b)(1) of such Act.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1146

To provide that any foreign nation that conducts a test of a nuclear weapon

in the United States shall pay the costs resulting from the test.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1993

Mr. KOPETSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foregin Affairs

A BILL

To provide that any foreign nation that conducts a test

of a nuclear weapon in the United States shall pay

the costs resulting from the test.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF COSTS RESULTING FROM CER4 TAIN NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTING.

5 Any foreign nation that conducts a test of a nuclear

6 weapon in the United States shall pay the costs associated

7 with the test, including the environmental restoration

8 costs as determined by the Administrator of the Environ9 mental Protection Agency.

Æ
Opinion issued June 11, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00390-CV

———————————

IN RE SHELL USA, INC. AND SHELL CHEMICAL, L.P., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Shell USA, Inc. and Shell Chemical, L.P. have filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus requesting this Court to vacate an order granting entry upon 

property.

1

1 The underlying case is Francisco Orozco Garcia v. Shell USA, Inc., Shell Chemical,

L.P., and Brandsafway, LLC, cause number 2022-73054, pending in the 157th

District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Tanya Garrison presiding.
2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

2013 PREEMPTION REPORT

FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE

The Federal Insurance Office (FIO) issues this report on actions taken regarding preemption of
inconsistent State insurance measures, pursuant to the Federal Insurance Office Act of 2010.
31 U.S.C. § 313(m)(1).

During the year ending September 30, 2013, FIO did not take any actions regarding the
preemption of any State insurance measure.

Ki #0

Michael T. McRaith
Director, Federal Insurance Office
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70507-70508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

45 CFR Parts 1355, 1356 and 1357

[RIN 0970-AA97]


Title IV-E Foster Care Eligibility Reviews and Child and Family 
Services State Plan Reviews

AGENCY:  Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF), 
Administration for Children and Families (ACHF), Department of Health 
and Human Services (DHHS).

ACTION:  Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This document corrects the regulatory text of the final rule 
on Title IV-E Foster Care Eligibility Reviews and Child and Family 
Services State Plan Reviews published in the Federal Register on 
January 25, 2000 (65 FR 4019-4093).

DATES:  Effective November 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Kathleen McHugh, Children's Bureau, 
202-401-5789.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the final rule, 45 CFR Part 1355 through 1357, beginning on page 
4019 in the issue of January 25, 2000, make the following correction. 
On page 4075 in the second column, instruction 2 currently says, 
``Section 1355.20 is amended by revising the definition of Foster care 
and by adding the following definitions in alphabetical order to read 
as follow:'' It is corrected to read, ``Section 1355.20 is amended by 
revising the definitions of Foster care

[[Page 70508]]

and Foster family home and by adding the following definitions in 
alphabetical order to read as follows:''
    The existing instruction calls for ``adding'' a definition, rather 
than revising the existing definition of a foster family home. This 
correction is necessary to avoid two conflicting definitions from being 
codified in the Code of Federal Regulations.

    Dated: November 17, 2000.
Brian P. Burns,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Resources and Management.
[FR Doc. 00-29990 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### WARREN v. STATE.

No. 26070.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 26, 1952.

*950No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The offense is driving while intoxicated upon a public road; the punishment, 30 days in jail.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record, and the proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.4

NOVOCURE LIMITED

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NovoCure Limited (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wilco Groenhuysen, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Wilco Groenhuysen                       
|Wilco Groenhuysen                           
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: March 1, 2017

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of NovoCure Limited under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4682

_____________________________

JEROME HAYES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

August 14, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jerome Hayes, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
TEN AX 

Law Group PC 

ATTORNEYS 

\VW\Y.tena:da\vgroup.com 

1·15 PARK PL'cCE, SUITE A 

POINT RICHMOl'<'IJ, CA 94801 

T: 510.234.2808 f: 510.2:34.6009 

March 23, 2016 

CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FA CSIM1LE 

Federal Aviation Adminstration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 0001 

Re: NOTICE OF DISSOCIATION 

(In the Matter of Kenneth Rav Rumberger) 

Docket Number FAA-2015-0639 (Civil Penalty Action) 

Dear Hearing Docket Clerk: 

Please be advised that we, in particular attorney N egar Pirzadeh (SBN 272054) 

dissociated herself as counsel of record herein for Defendant KENNETH 

RUMBERGER, effective July 2015. 

All fuhrre contact in this matter should be directed to Defendant RUMBERGER. 

Sincerely, 

Negar Pirzadeh, Esq. 

npirzadeh@tenax1awgroup.com
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00035

- CV

Robert MEDINA and Christina MEDINA

, Appellants

v.

Timothy K. BOWERS

, Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 11752 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED that the appellants have an e asement by necessity over the appellee’s property to access Gardner Road. The cause is REMANDED to the trial court to reconsider the issue of attorney’s fees.

We order that appellants, Robert Medina and Christina Medina, recover their costs of appeal , if any, from appellee, Timothy K. Bowers.

SIGNED December 27, 2018.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Salutation Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 18, 2000, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Salutation Consortium, 
Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Bethesda, 
MD; and Daniel Stevenson, Cambridge, MA have been added as parties to 
this venture. Also, Hewlett-Packard Company, Palo Alto, CA; Hitachi, 
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; 
Pistachio Software, Inc., Portland, OR; Sharp Corporation, Nara, Japan; 
TRG Products, Inc., Des Moines, IA; and Walletware, Inc., Irvine, CA 
have been dropped as parties to this venture. The following members 
have changed their names: Koos W. Hussem to Square USA, Inc., Basking 
Ridge, NJ; Shazia Azhar to Consumer Electronics Association, Arlington, 
VA; MicroBurst to Mburst, Rockville, MD; and Mita to Kyocera Mita, 
Osaka, Japan.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Salutation Consortium, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On March 30, 1995, Salutation Consortium, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on June 27, 1995 (60 FR 33233).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 19, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 11, 2000 (64 FR 49266).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-29985 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         40,915
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,043,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,258,879
<PP&E>                                         239,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (76,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,766,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,374,040
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       150
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,766,737
<SALES>                                        2,294,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,294,541
<CGS>                                          635,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               211,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,114,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                   167,161
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            947,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   947,247
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $.063
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $.063

        

</TABLE>