alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CRYSTAL LAGOONS’ EXPERT DISCLOSURES Page 1 of 3

MEGATEL HOMES, LLC, and ZACH

IPOUR,

Plaintiffs / Counter-defendants,

v.

CRYSTAL LAGOONS U.S. CORP.,

Defendant / Counter-plaintiff.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-1715-X

CRYSTAL LAGOONS’ EXPERT DISCLOSURES

Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 18) and the parties’ written agreement, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons U.S. Corp. (“Crystal Lagoons”) provides the 

following disclosure of the experts Crystal Lagoons has retained or specifically employed who may 

testify and present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 702, 703, and/or 705:

1. Richard F. Bero

The BERO Group

N27 W23960 Paul Road, Suite 202

Pewaukee, Wisconsin 53072

(262) 522-7922

Mr. Bero is expected to testify regarding the damages Crystal Lagoons has incurred or will 

in reasonable likelihood incur in connection with the allegations set forth in Counts I and II of 

Crystal Lagoons’ Original Answer and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint 

(Dkt. 10). Mr. Bero’s CV is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

2. Richard D. Anigian

Haynes Boone LLP

2323 Victory Ave., Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

(214) 651-5633

Case 3:22-cv-01715-X Document 25 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 238
CRYSTAL LAGOONS’ EXPERT DISCLOSURES Page 2 of 3

Mr. Anigian is expected to testify regarding the reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees 

incurred in this litigation, including as to the hourly rates charged and the relevant experience and 

skill of the attorneys working on this matter and matters of similar complexity. Mr. Anigian’s CV 

is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

Case 3:22-cv-01715-X Document 25 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 239
CRYSTAL LAGOONS’ EXPERT DISCLOSURES Page 3 of 3

Dated: March 20, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Richard D. Anigian

Richard D. Anigian

 Lead Attorney

 Texas Bar No. 01264700

 richard.anigian@haynesboone.com

Jason N. Jordan

 Texas Bar No. 24078760

 jason.jordan@haynesboone.com

J. Wilson Miller

 Texas Bar No. 24125326

 wilson.miller@haynesboone.com

HAYNES BOONE, L.L.P.

2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Telephone: 214-651-5000

Fax: 214-651-5940 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

CRYSTAL LAGOONS U.S. CORP.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel for Defendant hereby certifies that on March 20, 2023, a true and 

correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record in 

accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

/s/ Richard D. Anigian

Richard D. Anigian

Case 3:22-cv-01715-X Document 25 Filed 03/20/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 240
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R. L. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Gregory R. L. SmithGregory R. L. SmithChief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)August 12, 2008






---
H. J. Res. 228

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Joint Resolution

To approve the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to the products

of Romania.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress

approves the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect

to the products of Romania transmitted by the President to the

Congress on July 2, 1993.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

18:12 Oct 26, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\HJ228.ENR bend06
R

NDU GOOGLE CLOUD ACCOUNT

IMPORTANT: Do notstore Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in Google Cloud

Logging In To Your NDU Google Cloud Account

1. Go to www.google.com and click “Sign In”.

2. At the Sign In screen, use the Email address and

Password above. Click “Sign In”. Google should

prompt you to change your password.

3. Once signed in, click the Grid icon (“Apps) to see a

menu of available itemssuch as Mail, Drive,

Contacts, etc.

To change your password, follow these steps:

1. Click the drop‐down arrow by your name

2. Click “My Account”

3. In the “Sign‐in & Security” area, click “Signing in to

Google”

4. Click “Password” to change your password.

Passwords must be at least 14 characters in

length.

* Faculty and Staff Only: After 30 days of

inactivity, accounts will be disabled. After 60 days

of inactivity, accounts will be deleted.

*Student accounts: Student accounts remain active

for the duration of their course/academic year, and

are deleted once the course/academic year is

complete.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Johnson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered June 22, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his arrest was illegal. We find, however, that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant as the totality of the information known to the officers, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, would clearly warrant a prudent person to believe that the defendant had committed a crime *(see, People v Simmons,*114 AD2d 476).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit *(see, People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023; *People v Carbonaro,*162 AD2d 459; *People v Howard,*50 NY2d 583, 592, *cert denied*449 US 1023; *People v McCorkle,*119 AD2d 700, 701; *People v Smith,*100 AD2d 857, 858; *People v Logan,*25 NY2d 184, 195, *cert denied*396 US 1020). Lawrence, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case 3:22-cv-03274-C-BK Document 13 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 35
#### E. M. SORENSON et al., Appellants, v. The WARREN REFRIGERATOR COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 10962.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 14, 1941.

S. P. Nielsen, of Sebastian, for appellants.

Brown & Criss, of Plarlingen, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. The questions raised in the appeal do not call for a written opinion. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294.
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

IN THE LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOE HUNSINGER,

Plaintill.

ZETA GLOBAL HOLDINGS CORP. and

APPTNESS MEDIA GROUP, LLC.,

Def'endants Civil Action No. 3 :22-CV-2442-C-BK

ORI)EIT

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United

States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that the above-styled and -numbered civil

action should be DISMISSED without prejudice for fbilure to prosecute. PlaintilT failed to llle

any timely objections

The Court conducts ade novo review ofthose portions ofthe Magistrate Judge's report or

speciiied proposed findings or recommendations 1o which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bXlXC). Portions ofthe report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the

subject ofa timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See United State s v. ll/ilson,864 F ,2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989)

The Clourt has conduclcd an independent review olthe Magistrate Judge's findings and

conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court

Case 3:22-cv-02442-C-BK Document 13 Filed 05/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 51
For the reasons stated therein. the above-stvled and -numbered civil action is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and all pending motions are DENIED.

So ORDERED,

,t,

Datedthis jj day of May, 2023.

GS

R STATES DIS CT JUDGE

2

t/.nr|

SAM R.

Case 3:22-cv-02442-C-BK Document 13 Filed 05/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 52
Case 4:22-cr-00301-Y Document 37 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 71
Case 4:22-cr-00301-Y Document 37 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 72
Case 2:22-cr-00111-Z-BR Document 32 Filed 04/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

I, S. Leslie Flegel, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink Companies, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and we have:


a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.



Date: March 2, 2004

                                          /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          S. Leslie Flegel, Chairman and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4828 MARK ANTHONY BELL, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-97-55) Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 4, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL James F. Booker, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Mark Anthony Bell had finished serving his eighty-one monthprison term for drug conspiracy and firearm convictions and was serving the three-year supervised release portion of his sentence when he tested positive for marijuana use. The district court revoked Bell's supervised release and sentenced him to twenty-four months inprison. Bell's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that he has found no meritorious issues for appeal. Counsel alleges that the district court erred by imposing a twenty-four month prison term. Bell filed a supplemental pro se brief in support of that argument. Bell does not dispute that he used marijuana while on supervised release. He contends, however, that under the circumstances of his case, a twenty-four month sentence was not warranted. He notes,among other matters, that he had nearly finished serving his supervised release term at the time it was revoked and he was trying to gain custody of his sons. Under the version of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) in effect at the time Bell committed his original crimes of conviction, the court was obligated to terminate Bell's supervised release and impose a prison term of not less than one-third of his term of supervised release. Because Bell'ssupervised release term was three years, upon the revocation of supervised release he faced one to three years in prison. We find that Bell's sentence, which does not exceed the statutory maximum, was not plainly unreasonable. Pursuant to Anders , we have reviewed the record for reversible error and found none. We therefore affirm Bell's sentence. This courtrequires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
2quately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 29, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-411-000]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Filing

November 22, 2000.

    Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE), tendered for filing the Agreement for Interconnection 
Service (Agreement), between SCE and Harbor Cogeneration Company 
(Harbor).
    The Agreement specifies the terms and conditions under which SCE 
will interconnect Harbor's 80,000 kW generating facility with SCE's 
Harborgen Substation pursuant to SCE's Transmission Owner Tariff.
    Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities 
Commission of the State of California and all interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or November 30, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30357 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,298)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,368
<PP&E>                                          53,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,073)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,886
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,823
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,405
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,971
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,478
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

rtrafas@charter.net 

Saturday, August 11, 2012 11:07 AM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Skywest 

I ·1 

: ~; 

I am writing to encourage you to select Skywest Airlines as the main air carrier out of Brainerd, MN 

airport. We are frequent fliers who choose to fly out of Brainerd, MN through Mpls/St. Paul rather than 

flying out of Mpls/St. Paul. We definately would choose the larger carrier with full service bathroom and 

attendant over the smaller airline. We would not be flying on the smaller aircraft, but would drive to the 

cities instead .. I HATE flying in smaller airlines!!!!!! Thank you!!!! Bob & Rhoda Trafas. Brainerd, MN 

1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: C.F.G., A MINOR

PETITION OF: H.M.W.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 390 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 239

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 2, 1994

Committee discharged

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the President to proclaim September 1994 as

‘‘Classical Music Month’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President is hereby authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation designating September 1994 as

5 ‘‘Classical Music Month’’ and calling upon the people of
2

HJ 239 CDS

1 the United States to observe such a month with appro2 priate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.