alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




WRITTEN
STATEMENT




PURSUANT
TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




The
undersigned, Jay H. Schecter, the Chief Executive Officer and principal
executive and financial officer of Corporate Resource Services, Inc. (the
“Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:




(i)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      May 17, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Jay H. SchecterName:
      Jay H. SchecterTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive and financial officer)




The
foregoing certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David Lieberman, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The  registrant's other certifying  officer and I are  responsible  for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting; and
 5. I have  disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the equivalent functions):
 
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 15, 2010
 
 /s/David Lieberman


David Lieberman
 Chief Accounting Officer
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0423 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 095 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1223

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to establish the National

Resource Center for Grandparents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1993

Mr. HUGHES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to establish

the National Resource Center for Grandparents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Grandparent

5 Resource Center Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

7 Section 202 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42

8 U.S.C. 3012) is amended by adding at the end the follow9 ing:
2

•HR 1223 IH

1 ‘‘(f)(1) The Commissioner shall make grants to, or

2 enter into contracts with, one eligible entity to establish

3 and operate the National Resource Center for Grand4 parents (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Center’) to

5 serve as a central source of information and assistance to

6 grandparents who—

7 ‘‘(A) raise their grandchildren;

8 ‘‘(B) encounter problems obtaining access to

9 their grandchildren for purposes of visitation; or

10 ‘‘(C) need financial, legal, emotional, or infor11 mational assistance regarding their relationship with

12 their grandchildren.

13 ‘‘(2) The Center shall—

14 ‘‘(A) be staffed by employees and volunteers, in15 cluding such grandparents;

16 ‘‘(B) provide a toll-free telephone number to in17 crease access to the information and assistance

18 available from the Center;

19 ‘‘(C) collect and make available to such grand20 parents information regarding programs, projects,

21 and activities of public and private entities (includ22 ing governmental entities) relating the matters de23 scribed in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of para24 graph (1), including information on State law re-
3

•HR 1223 IH

1 garding grandparent visitation and Federal assist2 ance available to such grandparents; and

3 ‘‘(D) refer individual grandparents to public

4 and private entities that provide information or as5 sistance regarding the rearing of grandchildren, in6 cluding information regarding the prevention of drug

7 abuse and the promotion of good health and nutri8 tion.

9 ‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘eligi10 ble entity’ means a nonprofit private organization with a

11 demonstrated record of experience in representing the con12 cerns of older individuals with respect to their relationship

13 to their grandchildren.’’.

14 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

15 The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect

16 on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after the

17 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Abigail English
Abigail English is a lawyer, researcher, and advocate for the rights of vulnerable young people. Since 1999, she has directed the Center for Adolescent Health & the Law, a nonprofit organization in Chapel Hill, North Carolina that works nationally to support laws and policies that promote the health of adolescents and their access to comprehensive health care. Her research and advocacy have focused on health insurance and public financing of care for adolescents and young adults, consent and confidentiality protections, and sexual and reproductive health care. She received her undergraduate degree from Harvard University and her law degree from UC Berkeley's Boalt Hall School of Law. She has taught at the UC Berkeley School of Public Policy, the Boalt Hall School of Law, and the Gillings Global School of Public Health at UNC Chapel Hill. She was a Gallagher Lecturer for the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine in 1987, and she received the Child Advocacy Award from the American Bar Association Young Lawyers Division in 1997 and the Outstanding Achievement Award in Adolescent Medicine from the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine in 2000. She was the Frieda L. Miller Fellow at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University in 2010-2011. Her current work focuses on the problem of commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of adolescents and young adults.
  
Date Created: July 10, 2020
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
### Southwest Georgia Regional Airport

December 8, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Office ofAirport Compliance and ManagementAnalysis 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Re: ABY FAAFuel Tax Revenue ActionPlan (Commercial Service Airport) Office ofCompliance: The Southwest Georgia Regional Airport (SWGA) is a publically owned and operated commercial-service airport in Albany, Georgia. The airport is a department ofthe City ofAlbany and is not financially self-sufficient. For our current fiscal year, which runs July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, we will receive $716,309 in contributions from the City ofAlbany's general fund. At the current rate of sales tax that is generated by sales ofaviation fuel we would have to sell more than 23.8 million gallons ofaviation fuel per year to equal the contributions we currently receive. OurAction Plan is to monitorthe annual fuel sales and appropriate sales tax rates. Ifwe ever approach fuel sales that would exceed the monetary contributions that we receive from the local taxing authorities, we will develop a more detailed Action Plan. Please contact me ifyou have any questions orconcerns at dhamilton@albany.ga.us

DavidHamilton TransportationDirector

Southwest Georgia Regional Airport 

### I3905 Newton Road, Suite 100 

### I Albany, Georgia 31701 Phone (229) 430-5175 I www.FlyABY.com
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

January 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Environmental Groups

FROM: Angela Cullen

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Tuesday, January 4, 2011 between several 

environmental groups and EPA and included the following individuals:

Luke Tonafel (NRDC), Don Anair (UCS), Therese Langer (ACEEE), Siddiq Khan 

(ACEEE), Coralie Cooper (NESCAUM), Mark McCloud (EDF), Hilary Sinnamon 

(EDF), Ben Sharpe (ICCT), Brendan Bell (UCS), David Marshall (CATF)

EPA: Byron Bunker and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on stringency of the proposed engine and vehicle standards, advanced 

technology credits, labeling, and data collection.
United States District Co

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TE

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NrcoLE MCBEE (1)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

NICOLE MCBEE (l), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees,l25 F,3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CnlHa. P. 1 L, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the 2-Count Superseding

Indictment, filed on June 6th, 2023, After cautioning and examining NICOLE MCBEE (l) under oath concerning each

of the subjects mentioned in Rule 1 l, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that NICOLE MCBEE (1) be adjudged guilty of Wire Fraud, in

violation of l8 U.S.C. $ 1343, and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the

District Judge:

The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 31a3(aXl) unless the Cour-t finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

The Government does not oppose release.

The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

I find by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person orthe community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. $ 3142(b) or (c).

The Government opposes release.

The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 31a3(aX2) unless: (1)(a) the Courl finds there is

a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3 I a5(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and (2) the Courl finds by clear and convincing evidence

that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

SIGNED i 9th day of October, 2023.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen ( 14) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved party from affacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bX1XB).

$

$

$

$

$

n

/

/,

{,

{

n

tr

I

n

tJ s. t)ts IRt('t ('oUR.l. rt \()RTt ililtN r)ili.l.rtr(.t ()lr 1 LXAs IrlLIlI)

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGB

Case 3:22-cr-00385-S Document 28 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 280 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 280

 Providing for the appointment of Frank Anderson Shrontz as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 1993

 Mr. Mineta (for himself, Mr. Natcher, and Mr. McDade) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Frank Anderson Shrontz as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the resignation of Robert James Woolsey, Jr. of Maryland on 
April 2, 1993, is filled by the appointment of Frank Anderson Shrontz 
of Washington. The appointment is for a term of 6 years and shall take 
effect on the date on which this joint resolution becomes law.

                                 <all>
```
#### FERNANDEZ et al. v. SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W.

No. 10732.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 12, 1940.

Rehearing Denied July 10, 1940.

G. Woodson Morris, of San Antonio, for appellants.,

Henry, Bickett & Bickett, of San Antonio, for appellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Josefina G. Fernandez, joined herein pro forma by her husband, Cosme Fernandez, Sr., against Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World, seeking to recover the sum of $1,000 allegedly due her on an. insurance policy issued upon the life of her son, Jose Angel Fernandez, now deceased.

The trial was originally to a jury, but upon the completion of the evidence the trial court instructed a verdict in favor of the Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World, and Josefina G. Fernandez, joined by her husband, have prosecuted this appeal.

The policy of insurance and the constitution and by-laws of the' order (which are made a part of the policy) provide that premiums must be paid during the month for which they are due, and that failure to so pay the premiums when due would render the policy null and void. It is further provided that local camp officers have no authority to waive provisions of the policy or of the constitution and by-laws. It is also provided that the policy may be reinstated by payment of the past-due premiums and by the insured warranting that he will remain in good health for a period of thirty days.

The premium due on the policy involved herein for the month of June, 1938, was not paid during that month. Jose Angel Fernandez died on July 3, 1938. On July 8, 1938, his brother paid the June premium, some five days after the death of Jose Angel.

*315It is clear that when the June premium was not paid during that month the policy lapsed and became null and void. The payment of the premium five days after the insured’s death could have no effect. The fact that the local secretary customarily accepted the payments after the month for which they were due was not binding upon the Sovereign Camp, unless it was shown to have been acquiesed in by the general officers. This latter fact is not shown by the evidence.

Every question here presented 'has been decided heretofore, contrary to the contentions of appellants. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Cameron, Tex.Civ.App., 41 S.W.2d 283; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Oliva, Tex.Civ.App., 128 S.W.2d 101; McCurry v. The Praetorians, Tex.Civ.App., 90 S.W.2d 853; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Moraida, 131 Tex. 250, 113 S.W.2d 177.

The judgment is affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., disqualified, and not sitting.
Case 1:22-cv-00154-BU Document 1 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 1:22-cv-00154-BU Document 1 Filed 10/19/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2
Case 1:22-cv-00154-BU Document 1 Filed 10/19/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3
Case 1:22-cv-00154-BU Document 1 Filed 10/19/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4
Case 1:22-cv-00154-BU Document 1 Filed 10/19/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5
Case 1:22-cv-00154-BU Document 1 Filed 10/19/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Torres, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Diaz, J.), rendered September 16, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of imprisonment of *4Vi*to 9 years on each count, unanimously affirmed.

During a buy-and-bust narcotics operation, defendant’s accomplice Anthony Aquino mentioned the word "cocaine” as the undercover officer approached the corner of Ward and Watson Avenues in the Bronx. The officer indicated he was interested in some cocaine, whereupon Aquino led him to defendant. Defendant took one glassine envelope from his pocket, stating that in it was pure cocaine, and handed it to the undercover officer, who in return gave the defendant $10 of prerecorded buy money. Approximately eight minutes after this drug transaction, backup police officers responded to the scene and, pursuant to the undercover police officer’s radioed description, arrested the defendant and his accomplice. Aquino was in possession of the prerecorded buy money, while two additional glassine envelopes of cocaine were recovered from defendant’s pants pocket.

The evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was clearly sufficient to satisfy the elements of the crimes of which defendant was convicted. The weight of the credible evidence presented, particularly the testimony of the undercover officer, reveals that a different finding than that reached by the jury would be unreasonable *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490).

Although defendant claims that the prosecutor, on summation, denigrated his defense and drew inferences not supported by the facts, he never objected to these comments at trial *(see, People v Berrios,*71 NY2d 905). Moreover, defendant failed to preserve his claim that the prosecutor vouched for the integrity of the People’s witnesses by not raising this specific *364objection below *(People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641). In any event, the remarks which defendant now challenges were a fair response to the defense counsel’s argument in summation. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.