alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,188
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,697
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,875
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     19,700
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,222
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,246
<LOANS>                                        148,224
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,259
<DEPOSITS>                                     143,828
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,472
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,643
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 180,259
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,164
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  430
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,594
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,837
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,923
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,671
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,196
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,196
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       756
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .439
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .439
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.78
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       165
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    225
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,124
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,124
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,124
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            238
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20846]

[[Page 50808]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7556]

Certification Related to the Khmer Rouge Tribunal

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including under Section 7071 (c) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, 
Pub. L. 111-117), as carried forward by Full-Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10), and Delegation of 
Authority 245-1, I hereby certify that the United Nations and 
Government of Cambodia are taking credible steps to address allegations 
of corruption and mismanagement within the Extraordinary Chambers in 
the Courts of Cambodia (also known as the ``Khmer Rouge Tribunal'').
    This Certification and related Memorandum of Justification shall be 
provided to the appropriate committees of the Congress and published in 
the Federal Register.

    Dated:July 29, 2011.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-20846 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
```
Case 3:22-cr-00411-M Document 25 Filed 06/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48
JAMES TYLER III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2721

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

James Tyler III, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Frank ZUMMO et al., Appellant, v. N. W. NOLAN, Appellee.

No. 3838.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

March 27, 1941.

G. H. Wilder, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Morris & Bennett and S. D. Bennett, all of Beaumont, for appellee.

O’QUINN, Justice.

This case originated in justice court. The judgment in that court was appealed to the County Court of Jefferson County, at Law, where judgment in the sum of $75 was for appellee. This appeal is from that judgment. From an inspection of the record we have concluded the judgment should be affirmed. On the authority of Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Martinez v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Southwest Pump Co. v. C. F. Winfield, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Parker v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Sagarin v. Holliday, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Maryland Cas. Co. v. Palmer, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 1119, the affirmance is without written opinion. Affirmed.
#### POLLARD v. BIARD.

No. 4099.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 5, 1941.

Rehearing Denied June 26, 1941.

Sylvan Lang and Dalton Cross, both of San Antonio, for appellant.

H. Maxwell Parker, of San Antonio, for appellee.

SUTTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment of one of the County Courts at Law, Bexar County, for the recovery of $250 earnest money and interest thereon, under a contract of sale.

The defendant relied upon a. provision of the contract that if the title is found objectionable and could not be cleared in a reasonable time he might demand back his earnest money. He declined to perform after all objections had been met and without having previously given notice of any intention to decline to perform. He was also in default, having stopped payment on the earnest money check the day following the execution of the contract and before any objections had been raised.

We are of the opinion the judgment is a just and proper one under the law applicable to the facts of the case, anu it is affirmed without further opinion. McLoughlin et ux. v. Schnitzer, Tex.Civ.App., 147 S.W.2d 826.
Exhibit 32.02
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, George E. Crapple, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn Ridgefield
Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.


 /s/ George E. Crapple
 -------------------------
 George E. Crapple
 Co-Chief Executive Officer
 November 11, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dale R. Black, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |                                                                                                   
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                 
|                       |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                     
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.         
|                       | 
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                 
|                       |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                     
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.
|                       | 
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                 
|                       |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                     
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000836 22-AUG-2013 09:42 AM
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 23

- 3031

___________________________ Elizabeth J. Ziegler, an individual; Nichole L. Dietel

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

3M Company

Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________

Submitted: May 7, 2024 Filed: May 28, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, Chief Judge, SHEPHERD and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth Ziegler and Nichole Dietel sued 3M, their employer, for pushing
them to get vaccinated. The district court 1 dismissed on multiple grounds: filing too

1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.-2- late

, failing to exhaust, and not stat ing a cla im. The y argue on appeal that they have

state d a claim, but that still allows us to affirm on on e of the other grounds.

One path is particularly clear. The plaintiffs’ complaint raises two claims, the
first under Title VII and another under the Minnesota Human Rights Act

, both of
which set a filing deadline. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e -5(e)(1) ( 300 days ); Minn. Stat. § 363A.28

, subd. 3 ( one year ). The plaintiffs did not file in time under either one , so the district court dismissed the case

. See Hutson v. Wells Dairy, Inc. , 578 F.3d 823, 825

– 27 (8th Cir. 2009) (affirming the dismissal of an untimely Title VII claim).

The plaintiffs have waived any argument otherwise by failing to brief the issue on appeal

. See Far E. Aluminium Works Co. v. Viracon, Inc. , 27 F.4th 1361, 1367
n.2 (8th Cir. 2022) (“ C laims not raised in an opening brief are deemed waived.” ( citation omitted )). In these circumstances, we affirm on this “ independent ground[]

. ” United States v. May , 70 F.4th 1064, 1074 (8th Cir. 2023); see Rivero v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of N.M. , 950 F.3d 754, 763 (10th Cir. 2020) ( “If the district court states multiple alternative grounds for its ruling and the appellant does not challenge all those grounds in the opening brief, then we may affirm the ruling.”)

.

_____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Dallas Division

ROBERT HOPKINS, III, * 

* 

Plaintiff, * 

* 

v. * Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00706 (E) 

* 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, *

* 

Defendant. * 

* 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DECLARATION OF ROBERT HOPKINS, III

I, Robert Hopkins, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, hereby declare as follows: 

1. I am a person over eighteen (18) years of age and competent to testify. I make this

Declaration on personal knowledge. 

2. I have written about military history for several decades and published my first

book in 1997. A list of my creative works is attached to this declaration.

3. On July 21, 2023, I submitted a document to the Defense Office of Prepublication

and Security Review (“DOPSR”), intending to provide the document to my lawyer to assist his 

efforts to oppose the Government’s motion for summary judgment once DOPSR had cleared it 

for release.

4. The document was a mostly comprehensive response addressing almost all of

DOD’s redactions from the various manuscripts included in this case.

5. The document followed a simple pattern. First I would indicate the piece of

information DOPSR had redacted from a manuscript. Then I would attach an image of the 

Ex. A

Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 42-2 Filed 02/12/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 973
relevant portion of the unclassified and/or officially released document from which I sourced the 

information. Then I would give a full citation to the source document. 

6. For example, if I had written the sentence “The case was first assigned to Judge

Cummings before it was reassigned twice: once to Judge Fitzwater and finally to Judge Brown” 

on page 25 of one of my manuscripts, and DOPSR had redacted the names of the judges assigned 

to the case, the relevant section of my response document would have looked like this:

P. 25 Judges’ Names

6/13/23 Order, Hopkins v. DOD, No. 3:22-CV-00706-E (N.D. Tex.) 

7. Virtually everything in my response document was either a summary of redacted

material from a manuscript or a pasted image from an unclassified publicly available source and 

a citation to that source. 

8. This means that if one were to redact all the manuscript summaries from my

response document, the only substantive information that would be left would be images of 

unclassified, publicly available documents and the corresponding citations.

9. On October 23, 2023, DOPSR informed me that I was prohibited from providing

anything in my response document to my lawyer. 

I do solemnly affirm under the penalties of perjury and upon personal knowledge that the 

contents of the foregoing paper are true to the best of my knowledge. 

2

Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 42-2 Filed 02/12/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 974
Date: February 7, 2024 

#~__,. 

Robert Hopkin{, III 

3

Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 42-2 Filed 02/12/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 975
# Official Journal C 70/22 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 70 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4922 March 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 70

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4922 March 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2006/C 070/1 | Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the implementation of the European Pact for Youth | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 070/2 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2006/C 070/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4059 — Swiss Re/GE Insurance Solutions) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 070/4 | COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2006/C 070/1

Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the implementation of the European Pact for Youth

1

Commission

2006/C 070/2

Euro exchange rates

3

2006/C 070/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4059 — Swiss Re/GE Insurance Solutions) (1)

4

2006/C 070/4

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

5

---

| | II   Preparatory Acts |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 070/5 | Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 6 |

II   Preparatory Acts

Commission

2006/C 070/5

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02070

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frankie Smith, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered May 4, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 15 years to life, is unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s guilt flows naturally from the evidence, which established that he was an active, albeit furtive, participant in the sale of narcotics. Defendant had no direct contact with police, and while there was no evidence that he physically possessed the drugs, his participation in the sale was established by strong circumstantial evidence, including the use of defendant’s apartment and proof that he profited from the transaction.

*206Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel. Defendant now identifies and disparages the weaknesses in his defense, but defendant’s second-guessing is not a basis for reversal, especially since the record does not disclose what part defendant played in the determination to raise the defense with which he now takes issue.

The prosecutor’s strongly worded summation and his close cross-examination of the defense witnesses did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The comments which defendant now contends were unfair were not the subject of objection, nor has defendant established that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defense witnesses was not conducted in good faith.

We find defendant’s remaining contentions to be either unpreserved or lacking in merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marc Fierman, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Source Interlink Companies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Source Interlink Companies, Inc.


Date: June 9, 2005

                                                           /s/ MARC FIERMAN
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                         NAME: MARC FIERMAN
                                                  TITLE: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Case 3:22-cv-01463-K Document 10 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 72
Case 3:22-cv-01463-K Document 10 Filed 09/29/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 73
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Sumito Mulchandani, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 

Dated March 22, 2017

 
|   | /s/ Sumito Mulchandani                |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Sumito Mulchandani                    |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Lease |
|   | Trust 2015-A                          |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Mortgages of John Grasso. Trans-American Management Corporation, Respondent; William Ciembroniewicz, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Doran, J.), entered January 30, 1990 in Schenectady County, which, upon reargument, adhered to its original decision denying respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

Supreme Court did not err when, upon reargument, it adhered to its original decision denying respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to timely serve respondent personally with the petition. Pursuant to statute, Supreme Court, upon presentation of a petition to discharge an ancient mortgage, must order all interested persons to appear, and such order *"shall*be published in such newspaper * * * as the court shall direct” (RPAPL 1931 [4] [emphasis supplied]). While personal service is also available, it is not required (RPAPL 1931 [4]; *see also, Matter of Schwartz,*21 Misc 2d 845 [citing to Real Property Law former § 340, the predecessor to RPAPL 1931]). Finally, since respondent failed to set forth evidence in any affidavits to rebut the presumption of payment set forth in the petition, as is required by statute (RPAPL 1931 [5]), Supreme Court properly discharged the mortgage, which was due over 20 years ago *(see, Matter of Schwartz, supra,*at 846).

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guo Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
|   | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| By:             | /s/ Guo Yan |
|-----------------|-------------|
|            |        | Guo Yan |
|            |        | Chief Financial Officer |
|            |        |
| August 14, 2007 |

 

 

 

 

 

----