alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Sean B. OConnor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 16, 2010



/s/ Sean B. OConnorSean B. OConnorChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BURT v. STATE.

No. 21336.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 11, 1940.

H. L. Edwards, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of murder and assessed a penalty of five years in the penitentiary.

This case with the same question now before us has heretofore been before this court in No. 20910, reported in 138 Tex.Cr.R. 540, 137 S.W.2d 1045, 1046. We held at that time under a well-considered opinion that appellant was entitled to have his affirmative defense submitted to the jury without complicating issues. It is our opinion that on the second trial of the case the learned trial judge has failed to remove these complications.

Applying the facts of the case, which were the same as found in the record before us, it was held in the former appeal that the court should have instructed the jury, “if they had a reasonable doubt that he fired the shot in an effort to stop deceased, and had no intention of hitting him”, they should acquit him. It was further said that the court’s charge on accidental homicide was not sufficient to present appellant’s affirmative defense in that it was calculated to lead the jury to *887believe that appellant could be held guilty of murder if he was negligent and careless in discharging his pistol. This is not the law of this case. It was stated that accidental homicide was not shown to be in the case. It was further said that even though it had been, the charge of the court should not have been trammeled by conditions requiring the jury to find that negligent homicide was not in the case before they could acquit appellant of murder on his accidental theory.

Notwithstanding the foregoing holding, we find the following charge in this particular case: “If you believe from the evidence, or have a reasonable doubt thereof, that the defendant shot his pistol for the purpose of causing the said Bertie Y’Barbo to stop, and was not guilty of any negligence or carelessness in doing so, you will find the defendant not guilty.”

Under the authorities cited in the former opinion we think this charge is error requiring a reversal of the case.

We know of no stronger language to use than that heretofore used which states that where the evidence raises a defensive theory in an affirmative way, it is incumbent, upon the court to submit that theory in a charge untrammeled by other issues and without conditions such as found in the foregoing charge.

The court’s definition of murder should, of course, comply with the present statute, Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code, Art. 1256.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Case 3:22-cv-02131-S-BT   Document 67   Filed 10/26/23    Page 1 of 3   PageID 528

Case 3:22-cv-02131-S-BT   Document 67   Filed 10/26/23    Page 2 of 3   PageID 529

Case 3:22-cv-02131-S-BT   Document 67   Filed 10/26/23    Page 3 of 3   PageID 530
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Kirkland, Appellant.

Judgment modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: We reverse defendant’s conviction of burglary in the second degree, in this case of unlawful entry, and grant a new trial because the trial court committed reversible error when it included the "or remains” language in its charge to the jury on burglary in the second degree *(see, People v Gaines,*74 NY2d 358, 363; *People v Santiago,*158 AD2d 996, *lv denied*75 NY2d 970). Here, the court should not have referred to unlawful remaining in its burglary charge since the situation to which that language applies was not present in this case. Under the circumstances of this case, "the charge given by the court could have misled the jurors into thinking that any illegal entry constituted a burglary when coupled with a subsequent crime” *(People v Gaines, supra,*at 363). Thus, "defendant was entitled to a charge clearly stating that the jury must find that he intended to commit a crime at the time he entered the premises unlawfully” *(People v Gaines, supra,**901at 363; *see,*CPL 300.10 [2]; *People v Santiago, supra).*Since the evidence of guilt in this case is not overwhelming, we reverse and grant a new trial in the interest of justice even though defendant failed to except to the charge as given *(see, People v La Susa,*87 AD2d 578; *People v Almond,*37 AD2d 571, 572).

We find that defendant’s argument that he was deprived of a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct during summation lacks merit *(cf., People v Mott,*94 AD2d 415).

All concur, except Balio, J., who dissents in part and votes to affirm, in the following memorandum.

Balio, J.

(dissenting). I agree with the majority that there is no merit to defendant’s contention that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial. I also agree that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury regarding intent. In my view, however, this unpreserved error does not warrant the exercise of our discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). There was ample evidence to support a jury finding that defendant intended to commit a crime at the time he forced his entry into the premises. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—burglary, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: June 25, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 122)]
[Notices]               
[Page 36463-36464]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25jn10-110]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[DOT-OST-2010-0025]

 
Notice of Request for Renewal of a Previously Approved Collection

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended) this notice announces that the 
Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below which will be 
forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for renewal. The 
ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected 
burden. The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period 
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was 
published on February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5369). No comments were received.

DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by July 26, 2010 and 
sent to the attention of the DOT/OST Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503 
or oira_submission@omb.eop.gov (e-mail).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert C. Ashby, Office of the 
Secretary, Office of Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and 
Enforcement, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9310 (voice) (202) 366-9313 (fax) or at 
bob.ashby@ost.dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Report of DBE Awards and Commitments.
    OMB Control Number: 2105-0510.

[[Page 36464]]

    Affected Public: DOT financially-assisted State and local 
transportation agencies.
    Frequency of response: once/twice a year.
    Estimated Total Burden on Respondents: 1,311,000.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of 
the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology. All responses to this notice will be summarized 
and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also 
become a matter of public record.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 21, 2010.
Robert C. Ashby,
Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010-15419 Filed 6-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
[TYPE]     10QSB/A
[DOCUMENT-COUNT]     2
[SROS]     NONE
[FILER]
[CIK]     000943447
[CCC]     fcq4ats*
[PERIOD]     07/31/96
[ARTICLE] 5
[TYPE] EX-27
[NAME] HERITAGE MINES, LTD.
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
[CURRENCY] 
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                 6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]             JAN-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                  JUL-31-1996
[CASH]                        182,430
[SECURITIES]                  0
[RECEIVABLES]                 0
[ALLOWANCES]                  0
[INVENTORY]                   0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]              194,895
[PP&E]                        1,556,749
[DEPRECIATION]                108,799
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                1,702,785
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]         120,700
[BONDS]                       0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]         0
[PREFERRED]                   0
[COMMON]                      771,639
[OTHER-SE]                    1,914,913
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]  1,702,785
[SALES]                       0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]              0
[CGS]                         0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                 0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]              0
[LOSS-PROVISION]              0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]            10,155
[INCOME-PRETAX]               (795,272)
[INCOME-TAX]                  0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]           (795,272)
[DISCONTINUED]                0
[EXTRAORDINARY]               0
[CHANGES]                     0
[NET-INCOME]                  (795,272)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                 0
[EPS-DILUTED]                 0
</TABLE>
Case 4:22-cr-00276-O Document 41 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 78
Case 4:22-cr-00276-O Document 41 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 79
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Concession Contract Negotiations

AGENCY: National Park Service.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award an extension of an existing concession contract to 
the current concessioner authorizing the continued operation of Nauset 
Knoll Motor Lodge facilities and services for the public at Cape Cod 
National Seashore, Massachusetts for a term of one year from January 1, 
2001 through December 31, 2001.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 2000.

ADDRESSES: National Park Service, Concession Management Program, Boston 
Support Office, 15 State Street, Boston, MA 02109-3572, Telephone (617) 
223-5209.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This contract extension is being awarded to 
The Benz Corporation, Orleans, Massachusetts. It is necessary to award 
the contract extension in order to avoid interruption of visitor 
services.
    This action is issued pursuant to 36 CFR part 51.23. This is not a 
request for proposals and no prospectus is being issued. Park planning 
documents call for the future conversion of the Nauset Knoll Motor 
Lodge to Government use.

    Dated: October 30, 2000.
Chrysandra L. Walter,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 00-30150 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
#### BROOKS v. STATE.

No. 21225.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing has been presented which would authorize a reversal of the conviction. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

‘ The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68439-68440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27263]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0490; FRL-9902-61]

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Rescheduled Public 
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency is issuing this notice to reschedule the 3-day 
meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 
Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) to consider and review, 
Scientific Uncertainties Associated with Corn Rootworm Resistance 
Monitoring for Bt Corn Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs). The 
meeting was announced in the Federal Register on August 9, 2013. The 
Agency issued a notice of cancellation in the Federal Register on 
October 28, 2013.

[[Page 68440]]

The new meeting dates are December 4-6, 2013.

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 4-6, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. 
to approximately 5:00 p.m.
    Comments. The Agency encourages that written comments and requests 
for oral comments are submitted by November 26, 2013. However, written 
comments and requests to make oral comments may be submitted until the 
date of the meeting, but anyone submitting written comments after 
November 26, 2013 should contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO) 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. For additional 
instructions, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Environmental Protection 
Agency, Conference Center, Lobby Level, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Jenkins, DFO, Office of Science 
Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 564-3327; fax number: (202) 564-8382; email address: 
Jenkins.fred@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A cancellation notice was published in the 
Federal Register on October 28, 2013 (78 FR 64211) (FRL-9902-06). All 
other information provided in the Federal Register on August 9, 2013 
(78 FR 48672) (FRL-9394-3) remains unchanged.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: November 6, 2013.
Steven M. Knott,
Deputy Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-27263 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### DE LA CRUZ v. STATE.

No. 21197.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1940.

Schlesinger, Schlesinger & Goodstein, of San Antonio, for appellant

Lloyd W. . Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county, jail for two years and a fine of one thousand dollars.

It is made known to the court by proper affidavit that since the jurisdiction of this court attached appellant has died.

For the reason stated the appeal is ordered dismissed.
# Official Journal L 70/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.070.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 70 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5319 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.070.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 70

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5319 March 2010

---

| Contents | | IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 2010/151/EC |
| | * | Council Decision of 16 November 2009 on the signing and conclusion of a voluntary partnership agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community | 1 |
| Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community | 3 |

Contents

IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty

page

2010/151/EC

*

Council Decision of 16 November 2009 on the signing and conclusion of a voluntary partnership agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community

1

Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1274 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1274

  To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 
                        certain wicker products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1993

   Mr. Andrews of Texas (for himself and Mr. Archer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on 
                        certain wicker products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN WICKER 
              PRODUCTS.

    Heading 9902.46.02 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 takes effect on 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been a lower duty if the 
amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or withdrawal, 
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Reports and Resources

  © VladKol/Shutterstock.com (see reuse policy). Description
              Reports

Report of Activities and Recommendations to Congress 2001-2008 (2008)
	Combating Violence and Delinquency: The National Juvenile Justice Action Plan 1996 (1996)
	Combating Violence and Delinquency: The National Juvenile Justice Action Plan Summary (1996)Resources

Coordinating Council Interagency Work (2008)
	Federal Agencies Delinquency Development Statements (2008)Grant Programs

Grants.gov provides a website for federal agencies to post discretionary funding opportunities and for grantees to find and apply to them.
    
          Side navigation
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov