1036 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2010 / Notices 

appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after the publication of the final results 

of this review. We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of these reviews and for future deposits 

of estimated duties, where applicable. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (‘‘Assessment 

Policy Notice’’). This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by companies 

included in these final results of review 

for which the reviewed companies did 

not know that the merchandise they 

sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, 

trading company, or exporter) was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the all– 

others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediary involved in the 

transaction. See Assessment Policy 

Notice for a full discussion of this 

clarification. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit rates will be 

effective upon publication of the final 

results of this administrative review for 

all shipments of hot–rolled carbon steel 

flat products from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for 

the company listed above will be the 

rate established in the final results of 

this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.5 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis, the cash deposit will be zero; 

(2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company–specific rate published for 

the most recent final results in which 

that manufacturer or exporter 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in these reviews, a prior 

review, or the original less–than-fair– 

value (‘‘LTFV’’) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent final results for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the manufacturer is a 

firm covered in this or any previous 

review or the LTFV conducted by the 

Department, the cash deposit rate will 

be 23.87 percent, the all–others rate 

established in the LTFV. See Amended 

Final Determination. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and countervailing duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and countervailing duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping and 

countervailing duties. 

These preliminary results of review 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 30, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–128 Filed 01–07–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection Requests 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Acting Director, 

Information Collection Clearance 

Division, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of 

Management, invites comments on the 

proposed information collection 

requests as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before March 9, 

2010. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The Acting 

Director, Information Collection 

Clearance Division, Regulatory 

Information Management Services, 

Office of Management, publishes that 

notice containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or 

reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of 

the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

The Department of Education is 

especially interested in public comment 

addressing the following issues: (1) Is 

this collection necessary to the proper 

functions of the Department; (2) will 

this information be processed and used 

in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate 

of burden accurate; (4) how might the 

Department enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (5) how might the 

Department minimize the burden of this 

collection on the respondents, including 

through the use of information 

technology. 

Dated: January 5, 2010. 

James Hyler, 

Acting Director, Information Collection 

Clearance Division, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of Management. 

Institute of Education Sciences 

Type of Review: New. 

Title: National Title I Study of 

Implementation and Outcomes: Early 

Childhood Language Development 

(ECLD). 

Frequency: One time. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 16. 

Burden Hours: 36. 

Abstract: The study is being 

conducted as part of the National 

Assessment of Title I, mandated by Title 

I, Part E, Section 1501 of the Elementary 

and Secondary Education Act. The data 

obtained by this information collection 

will provide a sampling frame of eligible 

schools for the National Title I Study of 

Implementation and Outcomes: Early 

Childhood Language Development 

(ECLD). Once school districts have been 

indentified to participate in the study, 

they will be asked to complete a short 

form providing information about Title 

I schools in their district. This 

information includes the percent of 

student in a selected school that are 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2010 / Notices 1037 

eligible for free-or-reduced-price lunch, 

percent of third graders who are 

classified as reading proficient on State 

assessments in 2009–10, grade levels in 

selected schools, and number of 

students in each grade. Based on the 

information provided, up to ten schools 

per district will be randomly selected to 

participate in the full-scale study. The 

U.S. Department of Education has 

Mathematica Policy Research to conduct 

this study. 

Requests for copies of the proposed 

information collection request may be 

accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, 

by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending 

Collections’’ link and by clicking on link 

number 4195. When you access the 

information collection, click on 

‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view. 

Written requests for information should 

be addressed to U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., 

LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed 

to 202–401–0920. Please specify the 

complete title of the information 

collection when making your request. 

Comments regarding burden and/or 

the collection activity requirements 

should be electronically mailed to 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who 

use a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 

1–800–877–8339. 

[FR Doc. 2010–136 Filed 1–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; 

Overview Information; Readiness and 

Emergency Management for Schools; 

Notice Inviting Applications for New 

Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

(CFDA) Number: 84.184E. 

Dates: 

Applications Available: January 8, 

2010. 

Deadline for Transmittal of 

Applications: February 26, 2010. 

Deadline for Intergovernmental 

Review: April 27, 2010. 

Full Text of Announcement 

I. Funding Opportunity Description 

Purpose of Program: Past 

emergencies, such as the events of 

September 11, 2001, Hurricanes Katrina 

and Rita, and emergencies related to 

other natural and man-made hazards, 

reinforce the need for schools and 

communities to plan for traditional 

crises and emergencies, as well as other 

catastrophic events. The Readiness and 

Emergency Management for Schools 

(REMS) grant program provides funds to 

local educational agencies (LEAs) to 

establish an emergency management 

process that focuses on reviewing and 

strengthening emergency management 

plans, within the framework of the four 

phases of emergency management 

(Prevention-Mitigation, Preparedness, 

Response, and Recovery). The program 

also provides resources to LEAs to 

provide training for staff on emergency 

management procedures and requires 

that LEAs develop comprehensive allhazards emergency management plans 

in collaboration with community 

partners including local law 

enforcement; public safety, public 

health, and mental health agencies; and 

local government. 

Priorities: These priorities are from 

the notice of final priorities and 

requirements for this program, 

published in the Federal Register on 

March 11, 2009 (74 CFR 10656). 

Absolute Priority: For FY 2010 and 

any subsequent year in which we make 

awards from the list of unfunded 

applicants from this competition, this 

priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 

CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only 

applications that meet this priority. 

This priority is: 

LEA Projects Designed To Develop 

and Enhance Local Emergency 

Management Capacity. 

Under this priority, we support LEA 

projects designed to create, strengthen, 

or improve emergency management 

plans at the LEA and school-building 

levels and build the capacity of LEA 

staff so that the LEA can continue the 

implementation of key emergency 

management functions after the period 

of Federal funding. Projects must 

include a plan to create, strengthen, or 

improve emergency management plans, 

at the LEA and school-building levels, 

and within the framework of the four 

phases of emergency management: 

Prevention-Mitigation, Preparedness, 

Response, and Recovery. Projects must 

also include: (1) Training for school 

personnel in emergency management 

procedures; (2) coordination, and the 

use of partnerships, with local law 

enforcement, public safety or emergency 

management, public health, and mental 

health agencies, and local government 

to assist in the development of 

emergency management plans at the 

LEA and school-building levels; (3) a 

plan to sustain the local partnerships 

after the period of Federal assistance; (4) 

a plan for communicating school 

emergency management policies and 

reunification procedures for parents and 

guardians and their children following 

an emergency; and (5) a written plan for 

improving LEA capacity to sustain the 

emergency management process through 

ongoing training and the continual 

review of policies and procedures. 

Competitive Preference Priority: For 

FY 2010 and any subsequent year in 

which we make awards from the list of 

unfunded applicants from this 

competition, this priority is a 

competitive preference priority. Under 

34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award an 

additional five points to an application 

that meets the competitive preference 

priority. 

This priority is: 

Priority for Applicants That Have Not 

Previously Received a Grant Under The 

REMS Program (CFDA 84.184E). 

Under this priority, we give 

competitive preference to applications 

from LEAs that have not previously 

received a grant under this program 

(CFDA 84.184E). Applicants, including 

educational service agencies (ESAs), 

that have received funding under this 

program directly, or as the lead agency 

or as a partner in a consortium 

application under this program, will not 

meet this priority. Under a consortium 

application, all members of the LEA 

consortium must meet this criterion to 

meet this priority. 

Final Requirements: These 

requirements are from the notice of final 

priorities and requirements for this 

program, published in the Federal 

Register on March 11, 2009 (74 FR 

10656). The following requirements 

apply to all applications submitted 

under this competition: 

1. Partner Agreements. To be 

considered for a grant award, an 

applicant must include in its 

application an agreement that details 

the participation of each of the 

following five community-based 

partners: The law enforcement agency, 

the public safety or emergency 

management agency, the public health 

agency, the mental health agency, and 

the head of the applicant’s local 

government (for example the mayor, city 

manager, or county executive). The 

agreement must include a description of 

each partner’s roles and responsibilities 

in improving and strengthening 

emergency management plans at the 

LEA and school-building levels, a 

description of each partner’s 

commitment to the continuation and 

continuous improvement of emergency 

management plans at the LEA and 

school-building levels, and the signature 

of an authorized representative of the 

LEA and each partner acknowledging 

the agreement. For consortium 

applications, each LEA to be served by 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES