alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nicholas Pandolfo, Plaintiff, *v.*F. Paul Ansbro et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as F. Paul Ansbro, M. D., F. A. C. A. Associates in Anesthesiology, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

February 26, 1958.

*52*Martin, Clearwater & Bell*for defendants.

*Scotto & Mangano*for plaintiff.

Edward G. Baker, J.

Motion by defendant, Sweeney, under subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint as to him *individually,*upon the ground that the cause of action therein alleged did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of the action.

Said defendant is one of three physicians who are named as defendants in the action (for alleged malpractice) “individually and as co-partners doing business as F. Paul Ansbro, M. D., F. A. C. A., associates in anesthesiology.” Two of the defendants were served with the summons and complaint in the action within two years from the date the alleged cause of action accrued. The moving defendant was served after the expiration of two years from said date. He maintains that, as to him *individually,*plaintiff’s claim is barred by lapse of time.

The motion is denied. Although said defendant was served after the time limited by section 50 of the Civil Practice Act, he and his copartners are so united in interest within the meaning of section 16 of the Civil Practice Act, that the commencement of the action against one of them within the limitation period was sufficient to toll the statute as against the others. *(Partnership Law,*§§ 24, 26; *Plumitallo*v. *1407 Broadway Realty Corp.,*279 App. Div. 1019; *Prudential Ins. Co.*v. *Stone,*270 N. Y. 154; cf. *Farrell*v. *American Beverage Corp.,*203 Misc. 330.)
### SERVED : APRI L25 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F DEA N INTERNATIONAL , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDMS NO . FAA-20n-006 9 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2010SO19025 6 an dCas e No . 2010SO190260 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o th e undersigned . Al l ftiture pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dService List . 

### •;!"M£NTO F

.'— > 2:K 5

Lonni e A . Y Q Chie f Administrat i Attachmen t

- Service Lis tFDMS No . FAA-2011-006 9 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Stuart A . Goldstein , Respondent' s Counse l Law Office s o f

Goldstei n & Sord o 935 0 Sout

hDixi e Highway , 10t

hFloo r Miami , FL3315 6 TEL : 305-670-122 2 FAX : 305-670-706 5 Email : sgoldst219@.aol.co m Christophe r

R . Stevenson , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Southern Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suif

e 2WI000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC^30 . \ - 2 -
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**





Pursuant
      of 18 U.S.C. 63 1350, the Chief Financial Officer of Conmed Healthcare
      Management, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that this Form 10-QSB and
      the
      financial statements thereto fully comply with the requirements of Sections
      13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB and the financial statements thereto
      fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of
      operations of the Company.




November
                  14, 2007By /s/ Thomas W. FryThomas W. FryChief Financial
                  Officer


**A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to and will be retained by Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. and
      will
      be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 26, 2020

No. 04-20-00288-CR

Neil Howard MCGINNIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6773

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After Appellant’s trial, his trial counsel filed a Notice of Appeal. Appellant’s trial 

counsel now asks that appellate counsel be appointed and the deadline to file an opening brief be 

extended.

We ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court. See Duncan v. State, 

653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (authorizing appellate courts to abate appeals so the 

trial court can assure the appellant has effective assistance of counsel). 

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing, receive evidence as necessary—

including by electronic means such as a voice or video call—and make findings of fact and 

conclusions of law with respect to the following questions:

(1) Has Appellant been assigned appellate counsel, or has he retained any appellate 

counsel?

(2) Is Appellant indigent? 

(3) If Appellant is indigent and not already represented by court-appointed 

appellate counsel, does Appellant want court-appointed appellate counsel?

If Appellant wants and is entitled to court-appointed counsel on appeal, the trial 

court shall appoint counsel to represent Appellant. 

We ORDER the trial court to hold the hearing and deliver written findings of fact and 

conclusions of law to the trial court clerk within FORTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.

We ORDER the trial court clerk to file in this court, not later than TWENTY DAYS 

FILE COPY
from the date it receives the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the court’s written findings of fact and conclusions of 

law.

We ORDER the court reporter to make a record of the hearing and to file in this 

court, within TWENTY DAYS from the date of the hearing, a reporter’s record of the hearing.

We DIRECT the clerk of this court to deliver a copy of this order to the trial court, 

Appellant, all counsel, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter. 

Appellant’s trial counsel’s request for extension of time to file the opening brief is 

MOOT.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ARIANA GEORGE and RODNEY §

BOONE, Individually and as §

Representatives of the Estate of A.B., §

DECEASED, §

Plaintiffs, §

§

vs. § Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-1124

§

ACH CHILD and FAMILY SERVICES, §

et al. §

Defendants. §

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING

On this day the Court considered Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File 

a Responsive Pleading. The Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion and extends Defendant’s 

deadline to file an answer or other responsive pleading under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 to Plaintiff’s 

Amended complaint to November 8, 2022. 

SIGNED on ___________________, 2022.

KAREN GREEN SCHOLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01124-S Document 18-1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 535
#### MILTON v. STATE.

No. 21539.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 2, 1941.

John M. Mathis, Jr., of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of cattle theft and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary.

The procedure appears to be regular. No statement of facts or bills of exception are presented, and there is nothing for this court to review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
# Joint Forces Staff College Holds Combined Graduation

/ Published June 13, 2014
Norfolk, Va. -- The Joint Forces Staff College held a combined graduation ceremony for two of its four Schools today.  The Joint Advanced Warfighting School conferred a Master of Science Degree in Joint Campaign Planning and Strategy to 38 graduates, including four international students. The Joint and Combined Warfighting School graduated 243 students, including 10 international students.  U.S. Navy Admiral Bill Gortney, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, was the keynote speaker.
Admiral Gortney challenged the graduates to find the “yes.” “What makes a good staff?” he asked. “Find the ‘yes.’"
“If you don’t do that detailed planning, you can get hurt. You find the’ yes’, you develop the courses of action that leadership can use and choose from. You find that ‘yes,’ so that you have the ability and the facts to say no when you need to say no. I challenge you all to go out there and find that ‘yes,’” Gortney said.
“Leadership doesn't want to make a decision until the time is right....And you’re the one who develops those courses of action to finding the ‘yes’ to get to the right decision. Absolutely critical work,” he said.

The admiral also stressed the importance of teamwork. “You can’t do it alone; you have to do it with your shipmates, your wingman -- your battle buddy. When you go to staff, it’s important to remember that team work is absolutely critical as well,” he said.

Gortney also encouraged the graduates to remember to strike the right work-life balance. He listed five attributes: work, family, and physical, mental and spiritual health. “You have to put those five attributes in proper order, but you don’t get to control what order they’re in,” he said. Sometimes, he said, there may be a crisis at work that you would need to put work at the top; or there may be a family emergency where family is on top.

“You as leadership need to make sure everybody put the right priority in the right spot to deal with those particular challenges, and then when that particular challenge is over, to reorder those priorities,” he said.  “You have to make sure that the people who work for you keep track of those attributes and put them in the right order. And then you personally have to do it, because if you don’t follow or put those attributes in the right order, the people who work for you won’t do it as well.”

“I look out (in the audience) and I see the youth of America. I see my relief out there. I’m excited about our future and I’m excited about what I see out there,” he said.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20460

OPPTS-RCS-OMB-7f (revised 09/23/2009)

If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the contact:

Name: eMail: Phone:

Title of

Action:

Documentation of Changes Made During OMB Review Under Executive Order 12866

Docket #: EPA-HQ- FRL#: RIN: 2070-

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order 12866, entitled

Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). According to section 6(a)(3)(E) of the Executive Order,

whenever the Agency makes publicly available a regulatory action that was reviewed under Executive Order 12866, the

Agency is also required to:

(1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs (OIRA) for review under the Executive Order, i.e., the text of the draft regulatory action and, if applicable, an

assessment of the potential costs and benefits; as well as additional information required for those actions that are

determined to be economically significant under section 3(f) of the Executive Order (see section 6(a)(3)(B) & (C));

(2) Identify for the public any substantive changes between the draft submitted to OMB and the action that was

subsequently issued, using a method that is complete, clear and simple; and

(3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA/OMB.

For this regulatory action, were substantive changes made to the regulatory action reviewed

under Executive Order 12866? [Please check the appropriate answer.]

Yes. [The information identified in items 1-3 below is included in the docket, as applicble.]

No. [Only the information identified in item 1 below is included in the docket.]

Accordingly, the Agency has included the following information in the public docket for this

regulatory action: [Please check the appropriate box(s).]

(2) Documentation of any substantive changes that were made to the draft regulatory text that was

submitted to OIRA/OMB for review, when compared with what subsequently published, using one of

the following methods (select one):

(1) A copy of the information that was provided to OIRA for review under the Executive Order.

(3) Documentation of those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of

OMB, if any, are identified in the document using one of the following methods (select one):

(a) A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, with redline and strikeout to show all the

substantive changes that were made.

(b) A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made, with page and paragraph

references to the draft regulatory action that was submitted.

(a) Through attributions to OMB in the redline and strikeout version or other document identifying

the changes made at OMB's recommendation.

(c) Other (please describe):

(b) Other (please describe):
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Lance Larson, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Andean Development Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and



6.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: August 14, 2005



/s/ Lance Larson

Lance Larson

President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register: May 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 98)]
[Notices]               
[Page 28672]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21my10-150]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7022]

 
Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation; Lifting of 
Nonproliferation Measures Against Two Russian Entities

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A determination has been made, pursuant to Section 6 of 
Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as amended, to remove 
nonproliferation measures on two Russian entities.

DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela K. Durham, Office of Missile 
Threat Reduction, Bureau of International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-4930).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authorities vested in the 
President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (``IEEPA''), the National Emergencies Act (50 
U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et 
seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and Section 6 of 
Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as amended, a determination 
was made on May 12, 2010, that it is in the foreign policy or national 
security interests of the United States to remove the restrictions 
imposed pursuant to Sections 4(b), 4(c), and 4(d) of the Executive 
Order on the following Russian entities, their sub-units and 
successors:

1. D. Mendeleyev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
2. Moscow Aviation Institute

    These restrictions were imposed on January 8, 1999 (see 64 FR 
2935).

    Dated: May 17, 2010.
C.S. Eliot Kang,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12313 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
NOTE

Subject: Accounting for Volumes of Gasoline and Diesel from Exempt Small Refineries in 

the Calculation of 2012 Standards Under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) 

Program 

From: Christine Brunner 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0133 

Under §80.1405(c), EPA subtracts the volume of gasoline and diesel from exempt small 

refineries from the nationwide projected volume of gasoline and diesel used in the denominator 

of the equations for each of the four standards (cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, 

advanced biofuel, total renewable fuel). The exempt small refiner volume is given as: 

GEi = The amount of gasoline projected to be produced by exempt small 

refineries and small refiners, in year i, in gallons in any year they are 

exempt per §§80.1441 and 80.1442. 

 DEi = The amount of diesel fuel projected to be produced by exempt small 

refineries and small refiners in year i, in gallons, in any year they are 

exempt per §§80.1441 and 80.1442. 

For purposes of calculating the standards for 2012, we determined the values for GEi and DEi for 

21 small refineries that are exempt from being obligated parties in 2012. The identity of these 

small refineries and their individual gasoline and diesel volumes are Confidential Business 

Information (CBI), and have been kept on record within EPA's Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, Assessment and Standards Division. The total exempt volume from these refineries has 

been determined to be: 

GEi = 4.87 bill gal 

 DEi = 2.23 bill gal
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 27002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10742]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Arts Advisory Panel Meeting

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held by teleconference at the National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506 as follows (all meetings are Eastern time and 
ending times are approximate):
    Museums (application review): This meeting will be closed.

DATES: May 29, 2014. 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506; plowitzk@arts.gov, or call 202/682-5691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.

    Dated: May 6, 2014.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2014-10742 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```