alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B

Case 4:22-cv-00865-O Document 1-2 Filed 09/26/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 10
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GARCIA/DEFENDANT HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC.’S INDEX OF MATTERS BEING FILED P AGE | 1 

DOC# 8304799 / 79533.00041

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

HORTENCIA GARCIA

Plaintiff, 

v.

HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-865

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC.'S

INDEX OF MATTERS BEING FILED

Defendant HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC. files this Index of all documents filed in

the State Court Action: 

(1) Plaintiff’s Original Petition filed August 19, 2022;

(2) Citation issued for Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. issued on August 19, 2022;

(3) Return of Service returned August 23, 2022;

(4) Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.’s Original Answer and Demand for Jury

Trial filed September 16, 2022; and

(5) Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.’s Objections to Plaintiff’s Rule 193.7

Notice of Intent filed September 16, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00865-O Document 1-2 Filed 09/26/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 11
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GARCIA/DEFENDANT HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC.’S INDEX OF MATTERS BEING FILED P AGE | 2 

DOC# 8304799 / 79533.00041

Respectfully Submitted, 

MAYER LLP

750 North Saint Paul Street, Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75201

214.379.6900 / Fax: 214.389.6939

By: /s/ Robin R. Gant

Robin R. Gant

State Bar No. 24069754

E-Mail: rgant@mayerllp.com

Zach T. Mayer

State Bar No. 24013118

E-Mail: zmayer@mayerllp.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned does hereby certify that on September 29, 2022, the foregoing 

Index of Matters Being Filed was electronically filed, as required by the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of Texas, using the Court’s CM/ECF filing 

system, which will provide notice and a copy of this document, with attachments, to 

the following, who are indicated to be registered ECF filers in the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of Texas:

Ricky Kemph

THE LAW OFFICES OF KELLY T. CURRAN

5720 LBJ Fwy., Suite 440

Dallas, Texas 75240

Counsel for Plaintiff

Hortencia Garcia

☐E-Mail

☐Hand Delivery

☐Facsimile

☐Overnight Mail

☐Regular, First-Class Mail

☒CM/ECF

☐Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested

/s/ Robin R. Gant

Robin R. Gant

Case 4:22-cv-00865-O Document 1-2 Filed 09/26/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 12
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00859-CV

IN RE Aaron WILLIAMSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 21, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 5, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, which appears to 

complain the trial court has failed to enter an order of nondisclosure in accordance with section 

411.081 of the Texas Government Code. See TEX. GOV. CODE ANN. § 411.081. However, in 

order to be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must establish the trial court: (1) had a legal duty 

to perform a non-discretionary act; (2) was asked to perform the act; and (3) failed or refused to 

do so. In re Molina, 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding). 

Relator contends the trial court has informed him the trial court will not grant his petition 

until he pays the outstanding costs from his underlying criminal charge. However, we have 

nothing in the record to support relator’s claim. Therefore, relator has failed to provide us with a 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No.11-03-15883-CV, in the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, 

Texas, the Honorable Richard Terrell presiding. 
04-11-00859-CV

- 2 -

record showing the trial court has failed or refused to perform a non-discretionary act. See

Molina, 94 S.W.3d at 886; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 

837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Based on the foregoing, we conclude relator has not shown 

himself entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is 

DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Edward Woods, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>In consolidated criminal actions, defendant appeals from two judgments of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.H.O. at plea, Herbert J. Adlerberg, J.H.O. at sentencing), each rendered November 15, 2012, convicting him, upon pleas of guilty, of two counts of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgments of conviction (Robert H. Straus, J.H.O. at plea, Herbert J. Adlerberg, J.H.O. at sentencing), each rendered November 15, 2012, affirmed. </p><p>Defendant's argument that his guilty pleas were invalid because the court failed to advise him of his constitutional rights under<i> Boykin v Alabama </i>(395 US 238 [1969]) is unpreserved, since defendant "could have sought relief from the sentencing court in advance of the sentence's imposition" <i>(People v Murray</i>, 15 NY3d 725, 727 [2010]; <a href="../2015/2015_09615.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Guzman</i>, 134 AD3d 637</a> [2015], <i>lv denied </i>27 NY3d 965 [2016]), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. The only relief defendant requests is a dismissal in the interest of justice, and he expressly requests that this Court affirm his convictions if it does not dismiss the informations. Since it cannot be said that no penological purpose would be served by reinstating the proceedings, each charging, inter alia, aggravated unlicenced operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, we would affirm (<a href="../2013/2013_08025.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Diaz</i>, 112 AD3d 423</a> [2013], <i>lv denied </i>23 NY3d 1036 [2014]; <a href="../2011/2011_02946.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Schweitzer</i>, 83 AD3d 503</a> [2011], <i>lv denied </i>17 NY3d 800 [2011]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: June 12, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### WESTERN LIFE INS. CO. v. ALCORN et al.

No. 5319.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

June 16, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 8, 1941.

Fischer & Strickland, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Clayton & Bralley, of Amarillo, for ap-pellees.

FOLLEY, Justice.

This case originated in the County Court of Potter County, Texas. Articles 1873 to 1876, ’Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, providing for opinions by Courts of Civil Appeals, do not require written opinions in cases in which the judgment is one of affirmance and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of the application for writ of error. Associated Indemnity Corporation et al. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d *869294; Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. L. E. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Cage et al. v. Nueces County, Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W.2d 190; Moore v. Eckols, Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W.2d 1014. It is our conclusion that the judg-me" of the lower court should be affirmed. The affirmance is without written opinion.

Affirmed.
# Official Journal L 63/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 63 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 652 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 63

English edition

Legislation

Volume 652 March 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/345 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/346 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/345 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/346 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

h1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

147677

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147677

COA: 316724

Allegan CC: 12

- 017739

- FC

JAMES OLIVER MACKECHNIE, II,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### SKINNER v. STATE.

No. 21736.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1941.

Florence, Florence & Meredith, of Gil-mer, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Upshur County on a charge #of chicken theft, and assessed a fine of twenty-five dollars and thirty days in jail.

The procedure appears to be regular. No statement of facts or bills of exception are presented, and there is nothing for this court to review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 LCDR Steigelman published in the Interagency Journal
 LCDR TIM Steigelman, USNR, a graduate of AJPME Class 14-4 published *Leading the Interagency to Shape U.S. China Relations* in the Interagency Journal, Vol 6, Issue 4, Fall 2015. The article can be found at the link below. http://thesimonscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IAJ-6-4-Fall-2015-40-47.pdf
 SHARE
 PRINT
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,
as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha
Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C28 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement,
I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.





Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank
# Official Journal C 164A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.164.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 164A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5324 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.164.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 164A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5324 June 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2010/C 164A/01 | Notice of open competition: Research Officer — Industrial Relations & Workplace Development — Reference: EF/TA/10/02 | 1 |
| 2010/C 164A/02 | Notice of open competition: Research Manager — Human Resources Management Specialist — Reference: EF/TA/10/04 | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2010/C 164A/01

Notice of open competition: Research Officer — Industrial Relations & Workplace Development — Reference: EF/TA/10/02

1

2010/C 164A/02

Notice of open competition: Research Manager — Human Resources Management Specialist — Reference: EF/TA/10/04

3

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |
| 129 | (EL) |
| 137 | (LT/LV/MT) |
| 138 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 143 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 147 | (FI) |
| 149 | (IT) |
| 150 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 151 | |
| 155 | |
| 156 | (PL) |
| 157 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

129

(EL)

137

(LT/LV/MT)

138

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

143

(DE/EN/FR)

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(DA/FI/MT)

147

(FI)

149

(IT)

150

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

151

155

156

(PL)

157

163

164

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NO. 07-07 -046 7-CR NO. 07-07 -046 8-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A JAN UA RY

17, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ T RAVIS MITCHELL , APPE LLA NT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 32 0 T H DI ST RI CT COU RT OF P OT T ERCOU NT Y; NO S. 5 5557- D & 5555 9- D; H ON ORABLE DO N EM ER SON , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ.
ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON
F o l l o w i n g p l e a s o f g u i l ty , A p p e l l a n t , T ra v i s M i t c h e l l , w a s co n v i ct e d of d e l i v e r y o f a cont ro ll ed s ubst ance and s entenc ed to se v enteen y ears c onfinement. Proceed ing pro s e, Appel lan t fil ed a noti ce of ap peal chal len g ing his conv icti ons. The Tri al Cou rt ’s C erti ficat ion and D efendant’ s R ig ht of Appe al filed i n bot h c ases reflectthatthe cas es are pl ea-2

barg ain ed c ases w it h no ri g ht of appeal and that Appell ant waiv ed hi s r ig ht of appea l. By letter date d J anuar

y 8, 2008, thi s Cour

t notifie d Appell ant that the cer ti ficat ion s i ndi cat ed h e ha d n o r i g h tof

ap p e a l a n d in vite d hi m to ei th e r f ile am e n d e d ce rt if ica ti o n s sh o wing a ri g ht of appea l or

demo n st ra te o ther g ro unds for c onti nui ng the appeal s. Appel lan t was noti fied th at fail ure to do s o mi g ht resul t i n dismi ss al per Rule 25.2 of

the Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Procedu re . Appel lan t t imel y fil ed a letter

respon se to t his C our

t’ s i nq uir y . A rev iew of Appel lan t’ s respon se does not c ontradi ct the c erti ficat ion s fil ed by the tr ial cour t. W e conc lud e Appel lan t has not demonst ra ted w hy the appeal s shoul d not b e dis mis sed based on t he c erti ficat ion s s ig ned by the tr ial co urt.
Con seq uentl y , t he appe als are di smi ss ed.
Pat rick A. Pirtle Justice
Do not p ubl is h.
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Tuesday, December 10, 2019 Meeting December 10, 2019
Office of Justice Programs
Third Floor Main Conference Room (MCR)
810 7th Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Meeting SummaryAudio Recording
  
Date Published: December 10, 2019
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

DONOVAN TANNER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MEGAN J. BRENNAN, ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-00449-RWS-KPJ 

ORDER 

The above-titled and numbered action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 22, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings 

of fact and recommendation (the “Report”) (Docket No. 24) that Plaintiff Donovan Tanner’s 

Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of Texas (Docket No. 23) be granted. 

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report have been filed, neither party is 

entitled to de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions and 

recommendations, and except on grounds of plain error, they are barred from appellate review of 

the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District 

Court. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending time to file objections 

from 10 to 14 days). Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the motion (Docket No. 23) and the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report (Docket No. 24) and agrees with the Report. See United States v. 

Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 683 (1980) (“[T]he statute permits the district court to give the magistrate’s 

proposed findings of fact and recommendations ‘such weight as [their] merit commands and the 

Case 4:22-cv-00778-P Document 26 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 81
Page 2 of 2

sound discretion of the judge warrants.’ ”) (quoting Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 275 (1976)). 

Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation (Docket No. 24) is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Plaintiff’s motion (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED and 

this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of 

Texas. 

 

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8th day of August, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00778-P Document 26 Filed 08/08/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 82