alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 411 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 411

    Designating October 29, 1994, as ``National Firefighters Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 1994

 Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Weldon, Mr. Valentine, and Mr. Boehlert) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Designating October 29, 1994, as ``National Firefighters Day''.

Whereas there are over 2,000,000 firefighters in the United States;
Whereas firefighters respond to more than 2,300,000 fires and 8,700,000 
        emergencies other than fires each year;
Whereas fires annually cause nearly 6,000 deaths and $10,000,000,000 in property 
        damages;
Whereas firefighters have given their lives and risked injury to preserve the 
        lives and protect the property of others;
Whereas the contributions and sacrifices of valiant firefighters often go 
        unreported and are inadequately recognized by the public; and
Whereas the work of firefighters deserves the attention and gratitude of all 
        individuals in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 29, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Firefighters Day'', and the President of the 
United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States to observe the day with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León, Sala de lo Social, by order of that court of 28 January 2005 in Anacleto Cordero Alonso v Fondo de Garantía Salarial

(Case C-81/05)

(2005/C 93/30)

Language of the case: Spanish

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León, Sala de lo Social (High Court of Justice of Castille and León, Social Chamber) (Spain) of 28 January 2005, which was received at the Court Registry on 18 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Anacleto Cordero Alonso against Fondo de Garantía Salarial.

The Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León, Sala de lo Social, asks the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the following questions:

----

(1)  Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer (OJ 1980 L 283, p. 23).

----
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Dominic Phillips, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Samsara Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date:March 30, 2022By:/s/ Dominic PhillipsDominic PhillipsChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
United States District Cou

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TE

DALLAS DIVISION

LTNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CHARLES GATES (2)

REPORT AND BECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

CHARLES GATES (2),by consent, under authority of (tnited States v. Dees,125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has

appeared before me pursuant to Frn.,R. CPJM. P. I 1, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Information.

After cautioning and examining CHARLES GATES (2) under oath conceming each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11,

I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of

guilty be accepted, and that CHARLES GATES (2) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. $$ 641 and2,Theft of Government

Funds, and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guitty of the offenii Uy ttr. District Judge:

The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

The Defendant must be ordeied detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3la3(a)(l) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

K The Government does not oppose release.

\tr2 The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

,A.. I find by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

' \ person or the community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. $ 3 I a2@) or (c).

The Govemment opposes release.

The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 31a3(a)(2) unless: (l)(a) the Court finds there is

a substantial likelihood that, a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentenbe of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3 la5(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and nds by clear and convincing evidence

that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger or the community if released.

SIGNED November 17, 2022.

Failure to file written objections to this Report #tf,t;S.endation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXlXB).

$

$

$

$

$

tr

!

tr

tr

NO\/ 1 1 2-022

T'NITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00346-S Document 30 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 68
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 272 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.272
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                            Joint Resolution

  
 


    Designating December 15, 1993, as ``National Firefighters Day''.

Whereas there are over 2,000,000 firefighters in the United States;
Whereas firefighters respond to more than 2,300,000 fires and 8,700,000 
  emergencies other than fires each year;
Whereas fires annually cause nearly 6,000 deaths and $10,000,000,000 in 
  property damages;
Whereas firefighters have given their lives and risked injury to 
  preserve the lives and protect the property of others;
Whereas the contributions and sacrifices of valiant firefighters often 
  go unreported and are inadequately recognized by the public; and
Whereas the work of firefighters deserves the attention and gratitude of 
  all individuals in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Decem-P ber 15, 1993, is 
designated as ``National Firefighters Day'', and the President of the 
United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States to observe the day with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Lieberman, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 21, 2005

/s/ David Lieberman
-------------------
David Lieberman
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
# C_2005069EN.01002201.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/22

---

Action brought on 4 January 2005 by ReckittBenckiser N.V. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-2/05)

(2005/C 69/40)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 4 January 2005 by ReckittBenckiser N.V., established in Hoofddorp (The Netherlands) represented by G.S.P. Vos, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision of the Board of Appeal of the OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of the Board of Appeal of the OHIM;

| — | allow the registration of the Community trade mark application No 1 155 712; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the registration of the Community trade mark application No 1 155 712;

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs in accordance with Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs in accordance with Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Community trade mark concerned: | The three dimensional mark of a white and blue rectangular tablet with an oval white centre for goods in classes 1 and 3 (Chemical products for industrial purposes; bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use,...) - application No 1 155 712 |
| --- | --- |
| Decision of the examiner: | Rejection of the application |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 |

Community trade mark concerned:

The three dimensional mark of a white and blue rectangular tablet with an oval white centre for goods in classes 1 and 3 (Chemical products for industrial purposes; bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use,...) - application No 1 155 712

Decision of the examiner:

Rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94

---
Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda

February 17, 2022

12:00 – 12:45 pm Executive Session (Closed to Public)

12:45 – 1:00 pm Introduction & FIO Update

1:00 – 1:15 pm Presentation on Climate-Related Financial Risk and the 

Insurance Sector by Assistant Secretary Graham Steele

1:15 – 1:30 pm Update from the Availability Subcommittee

1:30 – 1:40 pm New Business

1:45 pm Adjourn
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James B. Perry, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |                                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ JAMES B. PERRY                                                                 
|                       |  | James B. Perry                                                                     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and President of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.         
|                       | 
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ JAMES B. PERRY                                                                 
|                       |  | James B. Perry                                                                     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and President of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.
|                       | 
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ JAMES B. PERRY                                                                 
|                       |  | James B. Perry                                                                     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and President of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

- WICHITA FALLS DIVISION - 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), Martin J. Gruenberg, 

Michael J. Hsu, Rohit Chopra, and Jennifer Whang, respectfully move for reconsideration of the 

Court’s Order of November 6, 2022, for the reasons set forth in their memorandum of law 

contemporaneously filed herewith (ECF No. 33). 

Respectfully submitted,

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Andrew J. Dober

Senior Counsel 

Bryce C. Quine (Tex. No. 24032976)

 /s/ Andrew A. Nicely 

Andrew A. Nicely (Va. No. 41750)

CORNELIUS CAMPBELL BURGESS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, et al.,

 Defendants. 

 CIVIL NO. 7:22-cv-00100-O 

 The Honorable Reed O’Connor, 

 United States District Judge

Case 7:22-cv-00100-O Document 34 Filed 11/11/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 379
Arthur E. Anthony (Tex. No. 24001661)

600 North Pearl Street, Suite 700 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (972) 761-8520 

Alternate Tel.: (972) 761-2237 

Email: bquine@fdic.gov 

Email: aranthony@fdic.gov 

Daniel Kurtenbach

3501 Fairfax Drive, D-7028

Arlington, VA 22226-3500

Tel.: (703) 516-5729 

Fax: (703) 562-2477 

Email: anicely@fdic.gov

 Counsel for Defendants 

DATED: November 11, 2022 

Case 7:22-cv-00100-O Document 34 Filed 11/11/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 380
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1, I certify that, on November 11, 2022, FDIC attorney 

Andrew Dober contacted Manuel Berrelez and all counsel for plaintiff and defendants by 

electronic mail to ascertain plaintiff’s position on the FDIC’s Motion for Reconsideration. Later 

on November 11, 2022, Mr. Berrelez informed all counsel for defendants that plaintiff opposed 

reconsideration. 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Andrew J. Dober

Senior Counsel 

 /s/ Andrew A. Nicely 

Andrew A. Nicely (Va. No. 41750) 

3501 Fairfax Drive, D-7028

Arlington, VA 22226-3500

Tel.: (703) 516-5729 

Fax: (703) 562-2477 

Email: anicely@fdic.gov

 Counsel for Defendants 

Case 7:22-cv-00100-O Document 34 Filed 11/11/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 381
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 11, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing 

to all counsel and parties of record registered to receive such notices. 

 

 /s/ Andrew A. Nicely 

 Andrew A. Nicely

Case 7:22-cv-00100-O Document 34 Filed 11/11/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 382
3 >xXec©I _e©Xc©?eoeb¤©f©Heewp© Qte©?7;B©tX©ee©X© at©we¡X~

Z©Xe©ebe]¥©©bX¥©©w©c we© E©w©exZec©tZ©te©?7;D©¢w~©qeeX¥©ee

l©we©e©¥eZ

+' <Xw© Qtw©w©X©bw wq©Xc¡x¥©bwee©_zeb©©te©exXw© X©

ZYqZt© ()

(* QewXx© Qte©Xtx¥©© w~w¦e©tw©bwee©e£we©¢©¥eZ©f©te©cXe©tw

;tXe©w©fyec© ~e©te©bt\e©w©ee¢ec©w©©ewZw

), He_etw© Qte©_c¥©f©te©?©7;C©tX~©bx©g©©©,0©e_e© Qte

<eXe©g©te©ReX¥©tZ~~©^e©tZ©te©@7;D©ei~eb©_ZZbec©e_etw

Xc©wb~ ce©Z©bebw©f©e_e©eeeZw¡e©f©te©¡we¢©f©Xe©Zc© ̈

q¡ee©e©tX¡wq©X©wee©w©te©c we©Zc©Ztxwe©f©?DJ© bu©Z4

©* Xe©Xc©x_X©wZbe©eq~X©Zd&©fkbwX~©,©wc¥©e£e	©Xc

. be©Xc¡bZe
©XbXcewb
©Xd&©e£e©w©te©we©jbxq©w Zbe

b e©wbcxq© cee¡ec©w Xbe©b wxe©Xc©be

*. O _bwee© Qte©<KJ©©cewqee©tX©te©Xtw¥©©beXe© _bxee©tZ

 ©e©_Zb{©©te©@7;E© Qte© _bwee©xf©X¥
©X¥©©¡wce©Zc¡wbe©

¢|©cb©cweb¥©©?DJ©©©te©ffybe©f©te©<eZe©f©te©QeX¥

*/ Mebc}eewr© Qte©ebc©f©te©K7;D©Xc©w© _bwee©¢w©_e©tXcec©w

ZbbcZbe©¢wt©te©AeeX©Nebc©Pbtec ~e©2-!© Qte©ebc©¢x~©_e©Z¡Zw~X_~e©l

 `~wb©webw©Xc©b¥xq© _zeb©©te©?eec©f©DlZw©7b©0©T"O;

§ 11,

*1 8¤FX¢© Qte©=?J©tZ©te©Z tw¥©©beXe©Xc©Xec©9¥FZ¢©Zc©JeXxq

Lbec e©:¥FZ¢©©q¡e©te©e[w©f©te©K7;D%© D©ve©e¡e©f©X¥

wbwebwe©_e¢ee©te©:¥GX¢©Xc©K7;7©wb~ cwq©w©weewq

eq~Xw©te©?7;D©¢w~~©Xb©w©ZbbcZbe©¢wt©?7;7©wb cwq©w©weewq

eqXw©X©te©Ze©Z¥©_e©Zecec©n©we©©we

)2# ?wws©<Ze$© Ste©?xwq©<Ze©h©tw©;t]e©w©UVVVV©W

7¡ec5©



7wZ©PebeZ¥©f©@wZbwZ~©Dww©

<Xe6© 7Z©;[fyec©Mt©

7w[©Oebe\©m©HXZqee©



Anna

Canfield Roth

Digitally signed by Anna 

Canfield Roth 

Date: 2023.05.30 

16:21:18 -04'00'

06/09/2023
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1221

To provide for the reduction of agricultural program debt and for donations

of grain to the countries of the former Soviet Union in exchange for

certain actions on their part.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1993

Mr. GLICKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To provide for the reduction of agricultural program debt

and for donations of grain to the countries of the former

Soviet Union in exchange for certain actions on their

part.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debt for Democracy

5 Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President may reduce the

8 amount of qualifying debt owed to the United States Gov-
2

•HR 1221 IH

1 ernment by, and make donations of grain determined to

2 be available under section 401 of the Agricultural Trade

3 Development and Assistance Act of 1954 to, any country

4 that—

5 (1) is an independent state of the former Soviet

6 Union (as defined in section 102(8) of the Agricul7 tural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602(8)); and

8 (2) enters into an agreement under section 3.

9 (b) QUALIFYING DEBT.—For the purposes of this

10 Act, a debt is a qualifying debt if it results from activities

11 under any authority of the Secretary of Agriculture, the

12 Commodity Credit Corporation, or any other agency or en13 tity within the United States Department of Agriculture.

14 SEC. 3. AGREEMENTS.

15 The agreement required for reduction of debt under

16 section 2 is—

17 (1) an agreement with the Government of the

18 United States to dismantle nuclear weapons or other

19 military-related objects and facilities within the inde20 pendent state; or

21 (2) an agreement, approved by the President as

22 meeting the objectives of this Act, with a nongovern23 mental business entity in the United States under

24 which such entity—
3

•HR 1221 IH

1 (A) receives an equity interest in a state2 owned enterprise within the independent state

3 of the former Soviet Union equal to the amount

4 of debt reduction; and

5 (B) undertakes the obligation to repay the

6 amount of the debt that has been reduced.

7 SEC. 4. IMPLEMENTATION.

8 In order to implement an agreement under section

9 3 and to protect the interests of the United States, the

10 President may—

11 (1) send technical teams to the independent

12 state that is a party to the agreement to monitor

13 and assist in the implementation of that agreement;

14 and

15 (2) renegotiate or cancel the agreement if such

16 agreement is not implemented according to its

17 terms.

Æ