alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re WELCH.

No. 22023.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1942.

Reeder & Reeder, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court of Potter County refusing to discharge the relator from custody upon the hearing of his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
February 13, 2001







April 28, 2005






 



Technitrol, Inc.



1210 Northbrook Drive, Suite 470



Trevose, PA  19053






 



AMI Doduco, Inc.



Murray Corporate Park



1003 Corporate Drive



Export, PA  15632






 



Gentlemen:






Upon your acceptance of the terms of this letter agreement as evidenced by your execution and delivery to Fleet Precious Metals Inc. d/b/a Bank of America Precious Metals (the "Consignor"), on or before the date hereof, of a copy of this letter, Technitrol, Inc. and AMI Doduco, Inc. (f/k/a Advanced Metallurgy, Incorporated) (collectively, the "Customer") and the Consignor agree, effective as of the date hereof to amend the fifth sentence of Paragraph 1 of that certain Consignment Agreement dated as of November 18, 1997, by and between the Consignor and the Customer, as the same may have been heretofore amended (as amended, the "Consignment Agreement"), to read as follows:



At no time shall the value of consigned commodities exceed (i) $35,000,000; (ii) such limit as the parties may agree upon; or (iii) such limit as Consignor may approve in its sole discretion ("Consignment Limit").


















Except as amended hereby, the Consignment Agreement and all agreements securing the Consignment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are in all respects hereby ratified and affirmed.



Sincerely,






Fleet Precious Metals Inc.



D/B/A BANK OF AMERICA



PRECIOUS METALS INC.



Consignor






By:  /s/ David R. Vega



David R. Vega



Senior Vice President
























Accepted and agreed as OF THE



28th day of APRIL, 2005.






TECHNITROL, INC.



Customer



By:  /s/ James M. Papada



James M. Papada



CEO & President






 



AMI DODUCO, INC.



Customer



By:  /s/ Drew A. Moyer



Drew A. Moyer



Secretary






 



The above signatory has the authority to execute the above amendment on behalf of Technitrol, Inc.






TECHNITROL, INC.



By: /s/ Ann Marie Janus



Ann Marie Janus



Corporate Secretary






 



The above signatory has the authority to execute the above amendment on behalf of AMI Doduco, Inc.






AMI DODUCO, INC.



By: /s/ Drew A. Moyer



Drew A. Moyer



Secretary
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 14

- 00050

- CV

B. L. M., Appellant

v.
J. H. M., III, Appellee

FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, NO. 423

- 021, THE HONORABLE CHRIST OPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant B.L.M. filed her notice of appeal on January 29, 2014 . The appellate
record was complete February 5, 2014 , making appellant ’ s brief due February 25, 2014 . On
February 21, 2014 , counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file
appellant’s brief.

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition
of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a)
(providing 180 days fo r court’s final disposition)

. The accelerated schedule constrains this
Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion in part and
order counsel to file appellant ’ s brief no later than March 12, 2014 . If the brief is not filed by

that date, counse l may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on February 25, 2014

.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2015-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 23, 2017

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|   | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford Motor Credit   Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
Case 2:22-cr-00012-Z-BR Document 37 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 91
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1996
<CASH>                                         906,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  481,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,387,835
<PP&E>                                      11,080,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,468,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,126,800
<BONDS>                                      2,607,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,742
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,186,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,468,276
<SALES>                                      1,779,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,779,843
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,393,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             403,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (613,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (613,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (613,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 19817 (j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors/ Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 8, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervision) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Malcom Monroe Jett, Christine Rojas Jett, Elizabeth Devlin Jett, 
Ellen Louise Jett-Mills, David Devlin Jett, all of Lexington, Kentucky; 
to acquire voting shares of Bluegrass Bancshares, Inc., Lexington, 
Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Bank of 
the Bluegrass & Trust Company, Lexington, Kentucky.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. David Gene and Susan Holden McCurry, Coralville, Iowa; to 
acquire additional voting shares of Washington Bancorp., Washington, 
Iowa, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Rubio 
Savings Bank of Brighton, Brighton, Iowa.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. David Bradley Erickson, Lakeland Shores, Minnesota; to acquire 
additional voting shares of Freedom Bancorporation, Inc., Hudson, 
Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of 
Lake Area Bank, Lindstrom, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 17, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-29930 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# Official Journal C 186A/5 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 186A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 635 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 186A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 635 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 186 A/01 | Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/164/20 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2020/C 186 A/01

Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/164/20

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of UAS
Drone Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 28, 2020



|/s/ Erez Nachtomy                      | 
|-------------------------------------- | 
|Erez Nachtomy,
Chief Financial Officer | 
|(Principal Financial Officer)          |
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: ATLE HEDLOY, Appellant

______________________

2016

- 1093

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/449,086.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

B RUCE D. S UNSTEIN , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Ti mbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant.

M ONICA B ARNES L ATEEF , Office of the Solicitor, United

States Patent and Trademark Office , Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by

T HOMAS W. K RAUSE

, M EREDITH H OPE S CHOENFELD

, S COTT C. W EID ENFELLER

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, B RYSON and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 15, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

September 28, 2018

2018 PREEMPTION REPORT

FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE

The Federal Insurance Office (FIO) issues this report on actions taken regarding preemption of 

inconsistent state insurance measures, pursuant to the Federal Insurance Office Act of 2010. 31 

U.S.C. § 313(n)(l); 31 U.S.C. § 313(f). 

During the year ending September 30, 2018, FIO did not take any action regarding the preemption 

of any inconsistent state insurance measure.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30259]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Transportation Partnership Council (The Council) Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) announces a 
meeting of the Transportation Partnership Council (the Council). Notice 
of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Time and Place: The Council will meet on Wednesday, December 13, 
2000, at 10 a.m., at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Nassif 
Building, room 10214, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. The 
room is located on the 10th floor.
    Type of Meeting: These meetings will be open to the public. Seating 
will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Handicapped 
individuals wishing to attend should contact DOT to obtain appropriate 
accommodations.
    Point of Contact: Jean B. Lenderking, Human Resource Leadership 
Division, M-13, U.S. Department of Transportation, Nassif Building, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., room 7411, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-8085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is provide final 
report on Phase II of the DOT labor-management climate study, address 
next steps for integrating labor-management strategic plan with climate 
assessment results; and review Council accomplishments.

Public Participation

    We invite interested persons and organizations to submit comments. 
Mail or deliver your comments or recommendations to Ms. Jean Lenderking 
at the address shown above. Comments should be received by December 1, 
2000 in order to be considered at the December 13th meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 20, 2000.
    For the Department of Transportation.
Jean Lenderking,
Labor Relations Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-30259 Filed 12-04-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                
<CASH>                                          29,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,626)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,760
<PP&E>                                          23,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,527)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,308
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,696)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,380
<SALES>                                         23,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,263
<CGS>                                           12,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       652
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (812)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Temporary Boilers in the CAA 112(c)(6) Listing Notice and Emissions Inventory

and 112(c)(3) Inventory

DATE: December 14, 2012

FROM: Nathan E. Topham, Environmental Engineer

Metals and Inorganic Chemicals Group, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD 

TO: Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0790

______________________________________________________________________________

Temporary boilers are not a listed source category in the 112(c)(6) inventory. They are 

not listed in Table 1, Table 2, or Table 3 in the 1998 112(c)(6) listing notice. Temporary boilers 

are not discussed in that notice as a source category already subject to regulation or being 

considered for regulation. See 63 FR 17838. The source categories of industrial boilers and 

commercial/institutional boilers in the 112(c)(6) listing are consistent with the source categories 

regulated through the Subpart DDDDD and JJJJJJ NESHAPs.

We do not have data for emissions of 112(c)(6) pollutants from temporary boilers in 

1990, the year on which the 112(c)(6) inventory is based. Estimating emissions from temporary

boilers would have been impractical when the inventory was developed for the 1998 listing 

notice and is impossible to do at this stage. Despite the practical obstacles in estimating their 

emissions, these boilers are only used for short periods in limited circumstances.1Therefore, we 

expect the emissions from such boilers would be negligible when compared to the emissions of 

industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers that are part of the listed source category and 

112(c)(6) inventory.

The same circumstances apply to the inventory developed to fulfill the requirements of 

CAA 112(c)(3) and 112(k)(3)(B). The list of area source categories used for 112(c)(3) does not 

include temporary boilers as a category listed for regulation or contemplated for future 

regulation. See 64 FR 38706, 66 FR 8220, 67 FR 43112, and 67 FR 70427. The same problems 

associated with estimating emissions from these sources for 112(c)(6) exists for the purposes of 

112(c)(3). In fact, the problem is compounded as there are 30 pollutants regulated under 

112(c)(3), compared with seven pollutants for 112(c)(6). Emissions of the 30 112(c)(3) HAP, if 

present, would be inconsequential when compared to the emissions from industrial, commercial, 

and institutional boilers that are a part of the listed source category and 112(c)(3) inventory.

 

1

These boilers operate in place of another non-temporary boiler while that boiler is being constructed, replaced or 

repaired. In such cases, the non-temporary boiler would be the boiler being regulated and would be accounted for as 

significant in our emission estimates for meeting CAA 112(c)(6) and CAA 112(c)(3).
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

EDWARD J. SIMPKINS,

Petitioner,

 v.

 OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2012-3201 

______________________ 

Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in 

case no. DC844E110968-I-1. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION 

______________________ 

O R D E R 

 Edward J. Simpkins moves for leave to supplement 

the record on appeal. The Office of Personnel Management opposes. 

 Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion for leave to supplement the record is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to 

Case: 12-3201 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 01/14/2013
2 EDWARD SIMPKINS v. OPM

hear this case. A copy of the motion and Simpkins’s 

submission shall be transmitted to the merits panel. 

 FOR THE COURT

 

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s25 

Case: 12-3201 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 01/14/2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 151 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of March, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Should Commonwealth v. Smith , 244 A.3d 13 (Pa. Super. 2020), which was never reviewed by this Court but bound the panel below, be overruled (at least to the extent that it applies to prophylactic petitions like the present one) and should Pennsylvania instead recognize and adopt the superi or procedure of “stay and abey” used by federal courts under the analogous deadlines of 28 U.S.C. § 2254?