alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Monday, July 28, 2014 Meeting June 28, 2014
Office of Justice Programs
Third Floor Main Conference Room
810 7th Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance

July 28, 2014 Meeting Materials

**Presenters Bios**

Michael Thompson
	Osbert Duoa
	Starcia Ague**Handouts**

Federal Interagency Reentry Council Overview
	Federal Interagency Reentry Council Juvenile Reentry One-pager
	Federal Interagency Reentry Council Juvenile Reentry Myth Buster
	The Second Chance Act: Juvenile Reentry
	De-Stigmatizing Incarceration
	Stop Washington State from Distributing Juvenile Records
	Recruiting Youth for the 2014 Capitol Classroom
	Youth Transition Center, Providence, Rhode Island Brochure
	Harvest Kitchen Overview**Justice Center - The Council of State Governments**

Justice Center - The Council of State Governments PowerPoint Presentation**Federal Agency Handouts****U.S. Department of Agriculture**

National Institute of Food and Agriculture - Division of Youth and 4-H
	Living Interactive Family Education - 4-H Life Program
	Table of Youth in Transition - Alabama A&M University**U.S. Department of Health and Human Services**

Agency Announcements**U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration**

Developed Resources on Juvenile Justice and Reentry One-Pager
  
Date Published: June 28, 2014
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
# COUNTY of :BLAIR

COURTHOUSE TERRY TOMASSETTI 423 ALLEGHENY ST., STE President DIANE L. MELING Vice President TED BEAM, JR. HOLLlDA TELEPHONE FAXNUM8ER

, Secretary HELEN P. SCHMITT "' ChiefCierk

## ··~::~~~U~'il:l~-1\tiiaril!lie"'•~~>~~~;·::;; ATHAN W. 

## KARN, SR.**·;;~:::;:;i!:!-··:e:::** Solicitor 

### Mr. Michael Martin United States Department ofTransportation Office of

### :A:viation :A:nalysis Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Conununity Air Service Development Program

.. ,4ri:J.r<,A···s·D·

### P"**''",,,~Q~'n~** . .:J



### Re: OST -2002-11446 Sun Air International Proposal to Provide Subsidized Air Service

## t~::Alto;~a Pennsylvania r:: ... 1 ':

.. Dear M;r. Martin:

•. I

< \**~** ...... •• •• :· Thank you for the opportw1ity to express our support of Sun Air

### International~~ proposal to provide air service to 

### the Blair County Airport. The Blair County Airport Authority is conunitted to making the best use ofthe airport and to tlie local conununity. Blair County's economic development is heavily influenced by the airport. Decisions made now regarding commercial airline service 

### will have a significant impact on the future ofthe airport, Blair County, and the businesses**co~unity.** 

### The Blair County Airport Authority, following a' thorough review ofthe proposals submitted, has reconunend Sun :A:ir International to provide Essential Air Service to the Altoona BlairCounty Airport. We are in agreement with this reconunendation and would ask that you look favorably upon this recommendation and grant Sun :A:ir International an opportunity to provide the Essential Air Service. Sincerely, Blair C.ounty Board of Commissioners

.--:-- ,..--;--" I '



# 1-e

# r"J**/CJ~rJa** 

## sse::ft? · 

# '7 ;2"' /

# ~~fC:,f,**T~rry** Tomassetti ..**~** .. ,.... ' • . • " •**J~** ; • I Diane L. Meling redBeam,V



### cc: Congressman Bill Shuster.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; MICHAEL 

G. ANDREN; TACTICAL MACHINING 

LLC, a limited liability company; 

FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, 

INC., a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his Official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; STEVEN 

DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as 

Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Before the Court is BlackHawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms’ 

(“BlackHawk”) Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 76), filed September 22, 2022. Plaintiffs indicate 

they do not take a position on the intervention in this case, while Defendants oppose. Id. at 4. 

Because Defendants are in opposition, they are hereby ORDERED to file a response explaining 

their position no later than October 7, 2022. 

SO ORDERED on this 23rd day of September, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 79 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1112
US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vicki H. Hitzhusen, Interim Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Vicki H. Hitzhusen                          
|Vicki H. Hitzhusen                              
|Principal Financial Officer of                  
|US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc.

August 8, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.



--------------------------------------------------------------------





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Andean Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended September 30, 2003,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Lance Larsen, President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2004



/s/ Lance Larsen _____________

Lance Larsen, CEO
1 

### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

POINT CONVERSIONS, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

WPB HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC,

Appellee

.

No. 4D19

- 3017

[ July 7, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach

County ; Glenn D. Kelley , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502019CA002264XXXXMB

.

Nancy W. Gregoire of Birnbaum , Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale,

for appellant.

Daniel E. Nordby of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Tallahassee, Matthew R. Chait and

Joseph W. Bain of Shutt s & Bowen LLP, West Palm Beach, and Garrett A. Tozier

of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

P ER C URIAM

.

We grant appellee’s Motion for Certification and certify conflict with Point

Conversions, LLC v. Omkar Hotels, Inc. , 46 Fla. L. Weekly D1170a, 2021 WL

1996397 (Fla. 1st DCA May 19, 2021).

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN

, and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1180

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to authorize State and local

governments to use social security account numbers for jury selection

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. WASHINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to authorize

State and local governments to use social security account numbers for jury selection purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO USE SOCIAL SECURITY NUM4 BERS FOR JURY SELECTION PURPOSES.

5 Section 205(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42

6 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)) is amended—

7 (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), in the matter pre8 ceding subclause (I), by striking ‘‘(E),’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘(F),’’;
2

•HR 1180 IH

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and

2 (F) as subparagraphs (F) and (G), respectively; and

3 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the

4 following:

5 ‘‘(E)(i) It is the policy of the United States that, not6 withstanding subparagraph (C)(v), any State (or any po7 litical subdivision of a State) may utilize the social security

8 account numbers issued by the Secretary for the purposes

9 of—

10 ‘‘(I) identifying duplicate listings of individuals

11 in master lists used for jury selection purposes; and

12 ‘‘(II) identifying in those master lists listings of

13 individuals who are ineligible for serving on a jury

14 by reason of their conviction for a felony.

15 ‘‘(ii) If and to the extent that any provision of Fed16 eral law enacted before the date of the enactment of this

17 subparagraph is inconsistent with the policy set forth in

18 clause (i), such provision shall, on and after that date,

19 be null, void, and of no effect.

20 ‘‘(iii) For purposes of this subparagraph the term

21 ‘State’ has the meaning that term has in subparagraph

22 (D).’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-10-001]

Take notice that on November 17, 2000, Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C. (Ozark) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to be effective November 1, 2000:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 104A

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 105

Ozark asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's order issued October 27, 2000, in Docket No. RP01-10-000.

Ozark states that it is filing to remove from its tariff provisions providing for the imposition of transportation charges for imbalance netting and trading pursuant to the directive of the Commission's order in this proceeding.

Ozark further states that it has served copies of this filing upon the company's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may                           ( print page 71100)                        be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2110(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30342  Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian,
and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE24
(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of
this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1286

To reduce the amount authorized for the Official Mail Allowance for Members

of the House of Representatives by 20 percent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Mr. HOLDEN (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. TORKILDSEN,

Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Ms. DANNER, Mr. KYL, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. COPPERSMITH, and Mr. BUYER) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To reduce the amount authorized for the Official Mail Allowance for Members of the House of Representatives by

20 percent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION.

4 Section 311(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Legislative Branch Ap5 propriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(e)(2)(B)(i)) is

6 amended by striking ‘‘3’’ and inserting ‘‘2.4’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with

9 respect to sessions of Congress beginning with the first
2

•HR 1286 IH

1 regular session of Congress beginning after the date of

2 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1687

FRANCIS YOMI TCHAKOUNTE,

Petitioner,

versus

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A78-692-621)

Submitted: October 31, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC,

Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant

Attorney General, Aviva L. Poczter, Senior Litigation Counsel,

Patrick J. Glen, Trial Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Francis Yomi Tchakounte, a native and citizen of

Cameroon, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision to

deny relief from removal. Tchakounte asserts that his right to due

process was violated because a pretrial hearing before the

Immigration Judge was not recorded or its contents otherwise made

part of the record. We have independently reviewed the record with

respect to this claim and find that Tchakounte has failed to

demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the failure to record the

hearing. See Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 320 (4th Cir. 2002); 8

C.F.R. § 1240.9 (2007). Next, we find no abuse of discretion in

the Immigration Judge’s denial of a continuance for adjudication of

Tchakounte’s second I-130 petition. See Onyeme v. INS, 146 F.3d

227, 231-33 (4th Cir. 1998).

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 

.... 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. 

J. NICHOLAS BRYANT 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Information, charging defendant with a violation of 

18 US. C. § 1343, that is, Wire Fraud. After examining Defendant under oath the 

undersigned magistrate judge finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

Case 5:22-cr-00099-H-BQ Document 18 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 40
 ...... . 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed November 9, 2022. 

UNITED STATES MAG TRA TE JUDGE 

Case 5:22-cr-00099-H-BQ Document 18 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 41
#### In the Matter of Genevieve Y. Gallagher, Also Known as Genna Rubin, an Infant, by Her Guardians, James W. Kephard and Another, for the Appointment of a Conservator for James A. Rubin. Genevieve Y. Gallagher, Also Known as Genna Rubin, an Infant, by Her Guardians, James W. Kephard and Another, Respondent, v James A. Rubin, Appellant, and Citibank, N. A., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered June 8, 1990, which granted plaintiffs motion, pursuant to CPLR 325 (e), to remove this action from the Supreme Court to Surrogate’s Court, and denied defendant-appellant’s cross motion for recusal, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This action was properly transferred to the Surrogate’s Court, in view of the pendency there of proceedings relating to the estate of Reba Rubin. The issues involved in this action and the pending proceeding are similar, and affect the administration of the estate before the Surrogate’s Court. As the Surrogate has been actively handling the administration of the estate since 1971 and was willing to accept jurisdiction of the Supreme Court action, it was proper to transfer the Supreme Court proceeding to the Surrogate’s Court. (CPLR 325 [e].)

While defendant claims that Justice Tompkins should have recused himself since the Surrogate had telephoned him and informed him that a transfer application would be presented to him, said communication was certainly not improper. There clearly is no evidence that the IAS court abused its discretion in not recusing itself. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Rosenberger, Asch and Wallach, JJ.