alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting, February 10, 2012**

# U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs

**810 Seventh Street NW, Main Conference Room, Washington, DC 20531**

**10:00–10:10 a.m.	Welcome and Opening Remarks**

*Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General and Coordinating Council Chair*****

**10:10–10:50 a.m. 	The Pathways to Desistance Study: Implications for Intervention and Policy**

*Edward Mulvey, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine*

*Carol Schubert, Research Program Administrator, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine*

**10:50–11:10 a.m.	Commentary and Discussion**

*Randy Muck, Senior Clinical Consultant, Advocates for Youth and Family 				Behavioral Health Treatment*

*Terry Zobeck, Associate Director for Research/Data Analysis, Office of 				National Drug Control Policy*

**11:10–11:25 a.m.	Break**

**11:25–12:10 p.m. 	Coordinating Housing Assistance with Educational Opportunities: the HUD- GreatSchools Partnership**

*Luke Tate, Senior Policy Advisor to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development*

*Maria-Lana Queen, Office of Public and Indian Housing, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development*

*Natanya Levioff, GreatSchools*

*Iris McLaurin-Southall, D.C. Housing Authority*

**12:10–12:25 p.m.	Agency Announcements and Updates**

****

**12:25–12:30 p.m.	Summary and Meeting Adjournment**

*Eric H. Holder, Jr., Chair*

# image1.jpeg
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1285 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1285

To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 relating to authorization of 
   appropriations for construction of public buildings by committee 
                          resolution approval.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1993

 Mr. Glickman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 relating to authorization of 
   appropriations for construction of public buildings by committee 
                          resolution approval.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Buildings Act Amendments of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO PUBLIC BUILDINGS ACT OF 1959.

    Section 7(a) of the Public Buildings Act of 1959 (40 U.S.C. 606(a)) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting after the third sentence the following: 
        ``No resolution of approval shall be adopted by such committee 
        for construction, alteration, purchase, or acquisition of a 
        building before the Administrator has submitted to the 
        committees a prospectus of the proposed facility.'';
            (2) in paragraph (4) by striking ``and'' following 
        ``available'' and inserting a comma; and
            (3) in paragraph (4) by inserting after ``proposed action'' 
        the following: ``, and that the vacancy rate, in the State 
        within 30 miles of the proposed facility, for commercial office 
        space comparable to that to be provided by the proposed 
        facility is greater than 10 percent unless the Administrator 
        certifies in the prospectus that material and substantial 
        savings will accrue to taxpayers of the United States from the 
        proposed facility''.

                                 <all>
```
----

(2004/C 70 E/288)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3514/03

by Giovanni Pittella (PSE) to the Commission

(25 November 2003)

Subject:   Course financed by means of the Structural Funds

On 11 November 2002 the Naples-based Istituto nazionale di formazione per le imprese culturali launched a course entitled ‘Content Specialist & Designer’ within the PON Asse III misura III 6/D-Codice progetto 5387 discipline. The course is financed by means of the European Social Fund.

The course students (who had to go through a selection procedure) have not received the grant awarded to them (EUR 10 389,14 per student), since the person in charge of the course — a Mr Palladino — has been deemed untrustworthy by the Ministry for State Education, Universities and Scientific Research on account of his previous record. On 30 April 2003 (20 days before the course was due to end) the Ministry decided that co-financing would be suspended and that the training project would be abandoned.

On the basis of the above information, does the Commission not think that, irrespective of any judgment regarding Mr Palladino, the 19 pre-selected women should not be denied their grants or have their course certificates withheld?

Does the Commission not agree that, in accordance with the rules, some kind of protection should be offered to the 19 unemployed course students who, having been duly selected, wished to take advantage of the opportunity afforded to them under the Structural Funds?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(16 December 2003)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

----
#### BELL v. STATE.

No. 21510.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 26, 1941.

John Menefee, of McCamey, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

'HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder; punishment assessed at fifty years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception, and on March 19, 1941, the judgment of the trial court was affirmed.

Appellant has now filed in this court his affidavit advising that he desires to withdraw his appeal in said cause. It is therefore ordered that the judgment of affirmance be withdrawn, and the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s request.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOHN ASIF, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-115

LT Case No. 16-2020-CF-9587-AXXX-MA

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed March 28, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender,

and Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
#### EMPLOYERS CASUALTY COMPANY et al. v. W. D. GORDON et al.

No. 3731.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Jan. 2, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 15, 1941.

Sewell, Taylor, Morris & Connally, of Houston, and David C. Marcus, of Beaumont, for appellant.

G. D. Baten, of Beaumont, for appel-lee.

O’QUINN, Justice.

Though tried in district court, the amount in controversy was within the jurisdiction of the county court, being the sum of $997.42. After careful consideration of the record, we affirm the judgment without written opinion. Associated Indemnity Co. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corporation v. Roy Stubblefield, Tex.Civ.App., 140 S.W.2d 1115.
#### Joseph Weiner et al., Plaintiffs, and Amy Gordon, Appellant, v Memphis Uptown Associates et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered on July 3, 1990, which, *inter alia,*denied appellant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant, the purchaser of a condominium apartment, seeks rescission of the purchase agreement and monetary damages based upon material misrepresentations allegedly made by the defendants, the sponsor of the condominium and its managing general partner. Appellant claims entitlement to summary judgment based upon a provision of the offering plan, incorporated in the contract of sale, providing that purchasers had the right to rescind within 15 days after the presentation of an amendment which contained "a material revision adversely affecting the rights, obligations or liabilities of then existing purchasers or reducing the undertakings or obligations of Sponsor”.

The IAS court did not err in determining that summary judgment in appellant’s favor was precluded by triable issues of fact as to whether the appellant had sought rescission within 15 days of presentation of the amendment, and as to whether the changes contained in the amendment were "material revisions” within the meaning of the offering plan and purchase agreement.

We have considered appellant’s remaining contentions, and have found them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 
  

			
		 	 




  

		 	                        Corporate
		 	                        Millennium Way West
		 	                        Phoenix Centre
	25th November 2014	 	                        Nottingham
		 	                        NG8 6AW
		 	
                        UK

 

	Strictly Private & Confidential	 	                        T: +44 (0) 115 979 6300
		 	                        F: +44 (0) 115 975 0600
	 Rick Smith
 4 Skegby Hall
Gardens
 Skegby
 Sutton-in-Ashfield

Nottinghamshire
 NG17 3FX
	 	  

                        
www.multipkg.com

	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	
	 	

 Dear Rick 
 EVP Asia,
Corporate Development & Technical Services 
 I am very pleased to formally confirm that you have been appointed Executive Vice President,
Asia, Corporate Development and Technical Services reporting directly to Marc Shore, CEO. 
 The change will be effective from 1st December 2014. Your
salary will increase to £185,000 per annum and your bonus earning potential will increase to 40%. All other terms and conditions of employment will remain unchanged. 

Please can you sign this letter, confirming your acceptance of the changes and return one copy to Sarah-Jane Hutchinson, Group HR Director, and retain one
copy for your personal records. 
 It only remains for me to congratulate you and to thank you for your continued support and commitment. 

 

	
	Yours sincerely
	
	/s/ Mike Cheetham
	
	Mike Cheetham
	President

  
  

I have read, understood and accept the terms contained in this letter 
  

			
	Signed:	 	/s/ Rick Smith
		 	  

	(Rick Smith)
		
	Date:	 	 11/12/2014
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth M. Roessler, President and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Holding Company and BWAY
Corporation (the Companies) and Kevin C. Kern, Vice-President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Companies for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 13, 2008



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth M. Roessler                                     
|Kenneth M. Roessler                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer                       
|                                                            
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                                           
|Kevin C. Kern                                               
|Vice-President of Administration and Chief Financial
Officer
#### In the Matter of Paul Coniglio, Respondent, v Dan Falasco, as Commissioner of the Department of Planning and Development of the Town of Babylon, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Planning and Development of the Town of Babylon, dated February 19, 1988, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), entered May 4, 1988, which, after a jury trial pursuant to CPLR 7804 (h), is in favor of the petitioner Paul Coniglio, reinstating him as a probationary senior building inspector in the Town of Babylon, and awarding him $26,176.75 plus costs.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants contend that it was error for the trial court to allow the case to go to the jury because the petitioner had failed to carry his burden of establishing he was discharged in bad faith. We disagree.

The termination of employment of a probationary employee without a statement or a hearing must be upheld unless there is a demonstration that the dismissal was violative of the Constitution, illegal, or made in bad faith *(see, Matter of York v McGuire,*63 NY2d 760, 761; *Matter of Dozier v New York*
      *681
      *City,*130 AD2d 128). The burden of proof is on the employee *(see, Matter of Bergamini v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*62 NY2d 897).

The petitioner presented evidence that, on at least one occasion, the appellants had withheld his pay for failure to return approximately $11,000 of termination pay he received when he resigned as Commissioner of the Department of Building and Grounds (he had been contesting the authority of the town to order him to return the money). The petitioner alleged that his failure to return this money was the real reason for his dismissal. Furthermore, the petitioner had received a favorable eight-week evaluation from the chief building inspector, whose job it was to evaluate building inspectors. A subsequent evaluation by the acting commissioner of the Department of Planning and Development of the Town of Babylon was unfavorable. However, it was not customary for a commissioner of the Department of Planning and Development to make an evaluation and here the unfavorable evaluation was made on the same day as the petitioner’s notice of dismissal. Further, by the acting commissioner’s own admission, he lacked any personal knowledge or basis in fact for his evaluation. Thus, we find that the petitioner made out a case of bad faith sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

We have examined the appellants’ remaining contentions and we find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2009, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2009 (di4 vision A of Public Law 110–329) is amended by striking 
2 

•HJ 38 EH 

1 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘March 

2 11, 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 38 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2009, and for other purposes.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David Lieberman, Chief Financial Officer ofWorld Health Energy Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/David LiebermanDavid LiebermanChief Financial Officer


Date: November15, 2010





________________
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"agency":"NCD","generated":"2018-01-17 09:19:32","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NCD"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["1"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["1"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q1"}
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LeCroy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas H. Reslewic, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Form fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Form fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



November 10, 2005                                /s/ Thomas H. Reslewic
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                     Thomas H. Reslewic
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Johnie LONG v. STATE.

No. 21502.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 19, 1941.

J. R. Porter, of Clarendon, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in Donley County on a charge of driving an automobile while intoxicated, and assessed a penalty of fifty dollars and ninety days in jail.

Appeal was had to this court and he now files an affidavit asking that his appeal he withdrawn. Accordingly the same is ordered dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas W. Fry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 11, 2011By /s/ Thomas W. FryThomas W. FryChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.