alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        1080 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               122099 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            143386 
<PP&E>                                       68598 
<DEPRECIATION>                              (19816)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              537492 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        70942 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       327 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  286208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                537492 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            118263 
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               103299 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2951 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              12013 
<INCOME-TAX>                                  4565 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           7448 
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  7448 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .15 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .15 
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1217 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1217

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide estate tax relief 
  for victims of the terrorist-caused airplane crash near Lockerbie, 
                           Scotland, in 1988.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1993

  Mr. Andrews of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide estate tax relief 
  for victims of the terrorist-caused airplane crash near Lockerbie, 
                           Scotland, in 1988.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTATE TAX RELIEF FOR VICTIMS OF LOCKERBIE TERRORISM.

    (a) In General.--No tax shall be imposed by chapter 11 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 on the transfer of the taxable estate of 
a citizen or resident of the United States who died as a direct result 
of the Pan American Airways Flight 103 terrorist disaster over 
Lockerbie, Scotland, on December 21, 1988.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to estates of 
decedents dying after December 20, 1988.
    (c) Statute of Limitations.--If refund or credit of any overpayment 
of tax resulting from the application of subsection (a) is prevented at 
any time before the close of the 1-year period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act by the operation of any law or rule of law 
(including res judicata), refund or credit of such overpayment (to the 
extent attributable to the application of subsection (a)) may, 
nevertheless, be made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the 
close of such 1-year period.

                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued October 23 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 00998
- CR

——————————— JOAQUIN CARLON , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1294334

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury found a ppellant, Joaquin Carlon , guilty of the offense of aggravated robbery. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court then found the allegations in an enhancement paragraph true and sentenced him to2

30 years in prison. See id. § 12.42(c)(1) (West Supp. 2014). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. Appellant’ s appointed c ounsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw, along with a brief stating that the recor d presents no reversible error and the appeal is without merit and is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967)

. Counsel’s brief mee ts the Anders requirements by pre senting a professional evaluation of the record and supplying us with references to the record and legal authority

. 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 ; see also High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978) . C ounsel indicates that he has thoroughly reviewed the record and is unable to advance any grounds of error that warrant reversal. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State , 193 S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). We have independently reviewed the entire record in this appeal, and we conclude that no reversible error exists in the record , there are no arguable grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous

. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at
14 00 (e mphasizing that reviewing court

— and not counsel

— determines, after full examination of proceedings, whet her appeal is wholly frivolous); Garner v. State , 300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (reviewing court must determine whether arguable ground s for review exist); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,3

826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) ( same); Mitchell , 193 S.W.3d at 155 (reviewing court determines whether arguable grounds exist by reviewing entire record)

. We note that a n appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grounds for appeal by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe , 178 S.W.3d at 827 & n. 6.
W e affirm the judgment of the trial court and gr ant counsel’s motion to
withdraw. 1 Attorney Jerome Godinich, Jr. must immediately send appellant the required notice and file a copy of th e notice with the Clerk of this Court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 6.5(c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).

1 Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex Parte Wilson , 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8055

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RASHAWN RAKI WALLACE, a/k/a Shawn P,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (3:07-cr-00155-JFA-17; 3:11-cv-03078-JFA)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Mallory Kent, LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM MALLORY KENT, 

Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellant. Stacey Denise Haynes, 

Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rashawn Raki Wallace seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Wallace has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of-- ) 

) 

Line Government Services, LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W917BG-07-D-0005 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58560 

Lea Carol Owen, Esq. 

Ben H. Bodzy, Esq. 

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, 

Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. 

Nashville, TN 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

James D. Stephens, Esq. 

Assistant District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East 

Winchester, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been resolved by the parties' joint stipulation of dismissal with 

prejudice. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. 

Dated: 26 March 2014 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58560, Appeal of Line Government 

Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-544-002]

Take notice that on November 16, 2000, Carnegie Interstate Pipeline Company (CIPCO) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to become effective October 1, 2000: 

First Revised Sheet No. 75

CIPCO states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's Order issued on October 26, 2000. This sheet was inadvertently not included in the November 13, 2000 filing.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30360  Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

   

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-PC1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
#### PARRACK v. STATE.

No. 25072.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty to the offense of possession of whiskey in a dry area for the purpose of sale and the offense of transporting whiskey in a dry area, the court assessed the punishment at a fine of $200.

The record contains no notice of appeal from such conviction.

It appears from the recognizance on appeal that such notice was given, but by order of the trial court and upon the request of appellant, notice of appeal was deleted from the record, and appellant was permitted to withdraw his appeal.

Appellant also has filed his application in this court to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 §

 Plaintiff §

§

§

 v. § Case No. 

§

§

 §

 Defendant §

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

The Court has considered the Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of 

 .

 

It is ORDERED that:

the application is granted. The Clerk of Court shall deposit the admission fee to the

account of the Non-Appropriated Fund of this Court. It is further ORDERED that, if the

Applicant has not already done so, the Applicant must register as an ECF User within 14

days. See LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g).

the application is denied. The Clerk of Court shall return the admission fee to the

Applicant.

 

DATE PRESIDING JUDGE

Stone et al. Mayorkas et al.

4:22-cv-00825 Adam S. Hochschild

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 10-2 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 751
#### TURNBOW et al. v. FREE et al.

No. 14119.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Feb. 21, 1941.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1941.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and R. E. Kepke and James Noel, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant State.

Edwin M. Fulton, of Gilmer, Hendricks Brown and Mike E. Powell, both of Fort Worth, and Trueheart, McMillan & Russell, of San Antonio, for appellant Turn-bow.

Florence & Florence, of Gilmer, for ap-pellees.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a suit in the form of trespass to try title, brought by J. W. Free and others against W. C. Turnbow, in which the State of Texas intervened as a party defendant. It is one of the four suits mentioned in W. C. Turnbow et al. v. J. F. Bland et al., 149 S.W.2d 604, on this day decided by us.

The controlling facts are the same as those in the Bland case, and the issues are the same. What we said in that case is decisive of this case.

All assignments of error are overruled.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

Motion for rehearing overruled per conclusions filed in W. C. Turnbow et al. v. J. F. Bland et al., Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W. 2d 604.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-170897) and Amendment No. 455 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 1, 2015
**Gladys Carrión**

**Gladys Carrión** is commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS), which has oversight of child welfare, including child preventive and protective services, foster care, and adoption; manages the state's juvenile justice system; and regulates and licenses child care. During her tenure, OCFS has earned national recognition for her initiative to transform the juvenile justice system she inherited from a "custody and control" model with a reputation for using excessive force on children; no oversight and few resources; and an 89 percent recidivism rate, to an evidence-based, trauma-informed, community-centered therapeutic model with significantly better outcomes for children and for maintaining community safety. Ms. Carrión's reform of New York's juvenile justice system also has included the closing of 21 empty or underutilized, but fully staffed, residential centers in local counties. Other positions she has held include staff attorney at the Bronx Legal Services Corporation, commissioner of the New York City Community Development Agency, chair of the New York City School Chancellor’s Task Force on Latino Educational Opportunity, executive director of Family Dynamics and program officer in community development at the Ford Foundation.  She has a J.D. from the New York University School of Law.
L. Preston Bryant, Jr. 

Secretary of Natural Resources 

COMMONWEALTH a/VIRGINIA 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 

TDD (804) 698-4021 

www.deq.virginia.gov 

JUL 17 2008 

Ms. Judith M. Katz, Dire~tor 

Air Protection Division (3APOO) 

u.s. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

David K. Paylor 

Director 

(804) 698-4000 

1-800-592-5482 

Reference: SIP Revision for Georgia 

Pacific Big Island 

Dear Ms. Katz: 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 110 of the Clean Air Act, we are officially 

requesting approval of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) approved on June 12,2008 under the authority of § 10.1-1185 of the Code of Virginia and 

submitted in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, 

Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans). The plan revision is effective upon the date 

of approval, June 12,2008. 

The revision consists of the control of visibility-impairing emissions from Georgia 

Pacific Big Island located in Bedford County, Virginia through the application of Best Available 

Retrofit Technology (BART). 

Enclosed are the following: 

1. SIP Revision, including the following: 

A. Federally enforceable state operating permit 

B. Statement of basis 

2. Public participation certification 
3. Summary of testimony and responses thereto 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know. 

DKP\RAM\kgs 

TEMPLATES\SOURCE-SPECIFIC\PLNOO 

SRCESPEC\G-P BIG ISLAND\GPBI-SIP.DOC 

Enclosures 

Sine ely, ,yJw/4,,/ 

David K. Paylor ~ "-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                               8,906
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        25,206
<ALLOWANCES>                         (2,705)
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     43,550
<PP&E>                               54,989
<DEPRECIATION>                       (28,438)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       274,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                83,624
<BONDS>                              95,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             152
<OTHER-SE>                           91,920
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         274,380
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     145,407
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        133,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   3,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      8,564
<INCOME-TAX>                         3,811
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  4,753
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         4,753
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.34


</TABLE>