alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,583
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,996
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,775
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     21,100
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             770
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               789
<LOANS>                                        155,519
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,301
<DEPOSITS>                                     151,536
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,851
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 191,301
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,288
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  454
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,742
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,923
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,039
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,703
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,280
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,280
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       821
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .536
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .514
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.60
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       516
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    794
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,003
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,001
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,001
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            103
        

</TABLE>
# C_2020287EN.01000101.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 287/01)

Last publication

OJ C 279, 24.8.2020

Past publications

OJ C 271, 17.8.2020

OJ C 262, 10.8.2020

OJ C 255, 3.8.2020

OJ C 247, 27.7.2020

OJ C 240, 20.7.2020

OJ C 230, 13.7.2020

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Carbro Constructors Corp. ) ASBCA No. 62264

)

Under Contract No. W912DS-18-C-0021 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Greg Trif, Esq.

 Trif Law LLC

 Morristown, NJ

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Lorraine C. Lee, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, New York

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: April 15, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62264, Appeal of Carbro 

Constructors Corp., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: April 15, 2021

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### TRI-STATE ASS’N OF CREDIT MEN v. HINSON.

No. 7461.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 22, 1941.

For former opinion, see 144 S.W.2d 881, reversing 117 S.W.2d 158.

David J. Smith, of El Paso, for plaintiff in error.

Mae M. Ament, of Alpine, for defendant in error.

GERMAN, Commissioner.

Plaintiff in error insists in motion for rehearing that this cause be reversed and judgment rendered in its favor! This contention is based primarily upon a statement which was inadvertently made in the original opinion. This statement is as follows: “Nothing was pleaded by defendant which would avoid the binding effect of the note of May 19, 1932. It follows, therefore, that judgment should be rendered in favor of plaintiff on same.” The statement should have been as follows “Nothing was pleaded by defendant which would avoid the binding effect of the note of May 19, 1932. It follows, therefore, that judgment should have been rendered in favor of plaintiff on same.”

In other words, we intended to state that in the trial court, in light of the pleadings, the court should have rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The case was tried upon the theory that’ limitation had been pleaded. It is evident that defendant in error intended to plead limitation, but failed to properly do so. Justice requires that the cause be remanded, and the motion is therefore overruled.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

RANDY LEE JOHNSON, § 

#202100008, § 

 § 

Plaintiff, § 

§ 

V. § No. 3:22-CV-2397-D 

§ 

JOHNSON COUNTY, § 

§ 

Defendant. § 

ORDER 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The undersigned district judge 

reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. 

Finding none, the court adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED. 

December 22, 2022. 

 ________________________________________ 

 SIDNEY A. FITZWATER 

 SENIOR JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-02397-D-BN Document 10 Filed 12/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 38
Resignation of Terrence O. Jones



 HIGHLAND FUNDS I 

HIGHLAND FUNDS II 

NEXPOINT CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND 

NEXPOINT CAPITAL, INC. 

(collectively, the “Funds”) 

September 22, 2015 
 Boards of Trustees of Highland Funds I,
Highland Funds II and NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund 
 Board of Directors of NexPoint Capital, Inc. 

200 Crescent Court, Suite 700 
 Dallas, Texas 75201 

Gentlemen: 
 Effective this day, please let this letter serve as
confirmation of my resignation as Trustee or Director, as the case may be, of the above referenced Funds and from all offices I hold with the Funds. 
  

	
	




	

 Terrence O. Jones
#### Joe TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 21760.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1941.

Tom M. Miller, of Graham, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of property over-the value of $50. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant has filed a motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Myrna Altreche, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), rendered December 13, 1988, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*501Since the defendant failed to make a sufficient prima facie factual showing in her motion papers to warrant a *Mapp*suppression hearing, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of her omnibus motion *(see, People v Reynolds,*71 NY2d 552; *People v Covington,*144 AD2d 238; *People v Gill,*138 AD2d 738).

The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### SHIPLEY v. STATE.

No. 21614.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1941.

Rehearing Denied June 18, 1941.

Henry R. Bishop, of Fort Worth, and Carlisle & Henry, of Kaufman, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of turkeys under Art. 1442b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., and under a further allegation of a prior similar offense he was by the court sentenced to serve two years in the penitentiary.

*828The statement of facts shows that appellant as well ,as his son and another man were found in possession of about 40 turkeys belonging to Mr. Cotton, and they stated they were taking these turkeys to market.

Appellant’s defense was an alibi, and an effort to show that the two other persons with him had pleaded guilty to the same offense. Evidently the strength of the alibi did not impress the jury.

The trial court charged the jury on the law of principals, and also on circumstantial evidence. It was also shown that prior to this trial appellant had been convicted of a similar offense in this same court, and the jury so found. Upon such finding the court sentenced appellant to the maximum time of two years as set forth in Art. 1442b, supra. See Art. 64, P.C.

There are no bills of exception in the record. We think the facts are sufficient, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant complains because we failed, in our original opinion, to discuss and dispose of his bills of exception. We have carefully searched the record for the claimed bills of exception without avail. Consequently, nothing is presented for review.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, OPERATIONS, AND CHANGES IN TRUST
CAPITAL AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,530,591
<SECURITIES>                                58,007,678
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,673,145
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,673,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,607,215
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,065,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,673,145
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            -2,598,919
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,485,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             -4,160,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                -4,160,847
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   -69.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   -69.76
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 42 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1113
Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 42 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1114
Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 42 Filed 11/01/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1115
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0243

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

MICHELLE SORENSEN,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 v.

ERIC SORENSEN,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT William Michael Gilbert, whose name appears next on 

the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals 

which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this May 6, 2024.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Eric Sorensen, Samantha A Howard, William Michael Gilbert

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0243
**Exhibit 35**

**SERVICER’S ANNUAL CERTIFICATION**

**MECHANICS BANK**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.10 OFTHE SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT**

This Servicer’s Annual Certification is delivered pursuant to a sale and servicingagreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among, California Republic Auto Receivables Trust 2015-2, California Republic Funding, LLC, Mechanics Bank,as Seller, Servicer, Administrator, Calculation Agent and Custodian (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), and U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee (the“Indenture Trustee”). All capitalized terms usedbut not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned thereto in Appendix A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement. 

The undersigned,a Responsible Officer of the Servicer, hereby certifies that: 

1.             A review of the activities of the Servicer and of the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2017 toand including December 31, 2017 (the “Review Period”) was conducted under my supervision. 

2.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Review Period. 

[SIGNATURE APPEARS ON NEXT PAGE] 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, in my capacity as specified below, has caused this certificate to beexecuted as of the date indicated below. 

 

 

 

Dated: March 29, 2018
  
/s/ Nathan J. Duda
  
Nathan J. Duda
  
Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1081

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit transportation

of illegal aliens for purposes of employment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. GALLEGLY (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. HUNTER,

Mr. OXLEY, Mr. STUMP, Mr. BAKER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. MOORHEAD,

Mr. DREIER, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. BEILENSON, Mr. ARCHER, Mr.

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. MCCANDLESS, Mr.

WELDON, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. GOSS, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. PACKARD,

Mr. INHOFE, Mr. GORDON, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr.

THOMAS of California, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. HERGER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr.

HORN, Mr. POMBO, and Mr. HUFFINGTON) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit

transportation of illegal aliens for purposes of employment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Illegal Alien Transpor5 tation Prevention Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 1081 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF TRANSPORTATION OF ALIENS FOR

2 PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT.

3 Section 274(a)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nation4 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(B)) is amended by insert5 ing before the semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘or in

6 furtherance of the employment of such alien’’.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 11725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03773]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8187]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Claes Oldenburg: The Street and The Store''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Claes Oldenburg: The Street and The 
Store,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about April 
14, 2013, until on or about August 5, 2013, the Walker Art Center, 
Minneapolis, Minnesota, from on or about September 14, 2013, until on 
or about January 14, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 11, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-03773 Filed 2-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No . DA 23 - 0500 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIE VELTKAMP,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 21 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2024

07/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0500
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THECHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
Janice B. Trouba, Chief Financial Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)       
          The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2008, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
          The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp,
          Inc.

|Date: November 7, 2008 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By: /s/ Janice B. Trouba      
      Janice B. TroubaIts: Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C28

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

  

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |   |
|------------------------|--------|