alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-40075 Summary Calendar

_____________________

DIOTSIS DEE SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TYLER POLICE DEPARTMENT; MEDICAL

STAFF AT SMITH COUNTY JAIL; RICHARD M. SMITH, Officer; TOM DEAL, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-362

_________________________________________________________________ January 7, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Texas state prisoner Diotsis Dee Smith, No. 654148, proceeding

pro se , appeals from the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 claims of excessive force used during his arrest and

deliberate indifference to a serious health risk of contracting

tuberculosis by being placed in a cell with inmates infected with

tuberculosis.-2-

He argues on appeal that the magistrate judge did not consider

all of the facts Smith pr esented. He also implies that the

magistrate judge did not conduct fair and impartial hearings.

A review of the hearing conducted in accordance with Spears v.

McCotter

, 765 F.2d 179, 180-81 (5th Cir. 1985), the memorandum

opinion and partial order of dismissal following the hearing, and

the memorandum opinion and order following his trial on his

excessive force claims reveals that the magistrate judge considered

all of the evidence presented to her and conducted fair hearings.

Furthermore, we AFFIRM the magistrate judge’s orders

dismissing Smith’s claims essentially for the reasons set forth in

the magistrate judge’s memorandum opinions and orders of dismissal.

Smith v. Tyler Police Department, et al. , No. 6:95-CV-362 (E.D.

Tex., May 1, 1996, and Dec. 12, 1996).

A F F I R M E D.
# Precision Aerial Compliance Solutions, LLC

**Request for amendment to FAA 333 UAS Exemption Exemption No. 13787**  **Regulatory Docket No. FAA -**  **2015 -**  **4229**

Contact: Scott Mcgowan Chief Executive Officer Precision Aerial Compliance Solutions, LLC 713 - 857 - 3583 smcgowan@precisionaerialcompliance.comTo whom it may concern:

Date: March 10, 2016 Re: Exemption No. 13787 Regulatory Docket No. FAA- 2015 - 4229 Precision Aerial Compliance Solution, LLC (hereinafter Precision Aerial) is requesting an amendment to our 333Exemption as listed and decribed below. 1. Operation of addition Aircraft Precision Aerial would like to add the following aircraft to our exemption.  UAV Solutions Phoenix 30  UAV Solutions ACE LE  DJI Phantom 4  Jasonbuilt C450 Quad (By using a collection of best - in - class components, Precision Aerial was able to construct a very reliable vehicle, with additional features and an alternative camera mount e nabling the C450 to excel at overhead operations. The C450 meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the 333 exemption. The C450 operates with the same pilot operating manual as the DJI Phantom 3 for which we already have exemption. (1)  Yu neec Typhoon H  Yuneec Tornado H920 It is our understanding the the FAA has the Pilot operating manual on file for all these aircraft (1)
EXHIBIT 31.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002












I, Jeffrey E. Smith, certify that:









1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PDI, Inc.; and









2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.












Date: January 28, 2011                                                                                     /s/ Jeffrey E. Smith


Name: Jeffrey E. Smith


Title: Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, 0 C. 20460 

Ann Marie Savini 

Regulatory Specialist 

Harcros Chemicals Inc. 

5200 Speaker Road 

Kansas City, KS 66106 

MAR Z '• 2015 

Re: Request for extension to submit fmal report for repeat fish and daphnid studies for Dgluco-heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)- (CASRN 31138-65-5). 

Dear Ms. Savini: 

EPA has received your March 19, 2015, submission on behalf ofHarcros Chemicals, 

Inc., (Harcros) requesting an extension oftime to submit final reports for repeat acute toxicity 

testing for fish and Daphnia for D-gluco-heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)- (CASRN 

31138-65-5). These studies were required pursuant to a test rule issued under section 4 of the 

Toxic Substances Control Act on January 7, 2011 (76 FR 1067) (HVP2). 

In your letter, you state that Harcros is requesting an extension to submit the final reports 

for these studies on May 31 , 2015, instead of the prior approved extension date of March 31, 

2015. As noted in your letter, Harcros is requesting this new extension date because the testing 

laboratory has informed Harcros that they would be unable to deliver the final report prior to 

April 3151

• 

EPA is granting the requested extension to submit the final report for the repeat acute 

toxicity testing for fish and Daphnia on May 31, 2015. As per Harcros' offer in its prior 

extension request to submit preliminary results, EPA does not find that necessary, but does 

encourage the submission of the final report as early as possible. 

Internet Address (URL) • http./lwww epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
If you have any questions, please contact John Schaeffer by phone, (202) 564-8173 or 

email, schaeffer.jolm@epa.gov. 

cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

Sincerely, 

PoJ~ Paul Lewis, Ph.D. 

Chief 

Chemical Information and 

Testing Branch
### Swanson, Brian (OST)

From: Sent: To: Subject: rtrafas@charter.net Saturday, August 11, 2012 11:07AM Swanson, Brian (OST) Skywest I ·1 :**~;**

I am writing to encourage you to select SkywestAirlines as the main air carrier out of Brainerd, MN airport. We are frequent fliers who choose to fly out of Brainerd, MN through Mpls/St. Paul ratherthan flying out of Mpls/St. Paul. We definately would choose the largercarrierwith full service bathroom and attendant overthe smaller airline. We would not be flying on the smaller aircraft, but would drive to the cities instead

..I HATE flying in smaller airlines!!!!!! Thank you!!!! Bob & Rhoda Trafas. Brainerd, MN

1
Case 4:22-cv-00966-P Document 1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00966-P Document 1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00966-P Document 1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00966-P Document 1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00966-P Document 1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00966-P Document 1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00966-P Document 1 Filed 10/25/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Recompetition of the Existing Contracts for the Management and Operation of the Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center.                    

*Date:*                        December 18, 2000.                    

*Time:*                        10:00 am to 5:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate contract proposals.                     

*Place:*                        Ritz-Carlton Hotel at Pentagon City, 1250 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                        Harvey P. Stein, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8137, Rockville, MD 20892, (301/496-7481).                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 16, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-30173  Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 120 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 120

To provide that funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may not 
   be used to purchase articles of packaged food not packaged in the 
                   United States or its possessions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mrs. Collins of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may not 
   be used to purchase articles of packaged food not packaged in the 
                   United States or its possessions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That funds appropriated 
to the Department of Defense may not be used by the Secretary of 
Defense or the Secretary of a military department to purchase an 
article of packaged food that was not packaged in the United States or 
its possessions.

                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER D ENYING M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Bryan Suhre

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00011

- CV

Trial court case number: 92053

- I

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

Date motion filed: March 2 5 , 2 022

Party filing motion: Relator

It is ordered that Relator ’ s Motion for Rehearing i s denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting f or th e Court

Panel con sists of Justices Goo dman, Rivas

- Molloy , and Farris

.

Date: June 21 , 2022
EXHIBIT 10.51


SUMMARY OF ORAL AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, DATED AS OF JUNE
11, 2002, WITH JONATHAN STERN

Effective, March 16, 2004 and March 22, 2005, Register.com, Inc. amended Mr.
Stern's letter agreement to provide increases to his base salary of $10,000 and
$7,800, respectively, bringing his total base salary under Section 2 of his
Letter Agreement of Employment, dated as of June 11, 2002 (the "Agreement") to
$267,800.

Effective March 9, 2005, Register.com, Inc. further amended Section 3 of the Mr.
Stern's letter agreement to modify his bonus eligibility for the year ended
December 31, 2004 pursuant to which he received a bonus for such year of
$157,686.
Case 4:22-cr-00268-P Document 35 Filed 09/21/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 34
Case 4:22-cr-00268-P Document 35 Filed 09/21/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 35
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News Tag:
  Feb. 14, 2019 Relevancy to the Joint Force The  Institutional Research, Assessment, and Accreditation Division (IRAAD) within Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University conducted a thorough review of Geographic Combatant Command, Functional Combatant Command, and JPME-II student feedback and have published it's analysis on JFSC's "Relevancy to the Joint Force", published Sept 2017.
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 A1 40 1 . CHAPMAN v

. CHAPMAN.

Th i s a p p eal was d o ck et ed o n Ap ri l 2 9

, 2 0 24

. Th e ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef an d

en u m erat i o n o f erro rs were d ue t o b e fi l ed n o l at er t h an M ay 20

, 20 2 4

. Co u rt o f

Ap p eal s Ru l e 23 (a). Th e ap p el l an t h as n ot t i m el y fi led a b ri ef an d en u m e r a t i o n o f

erro rs

, an d n o ex ten s i on o f ti m e fo r fi l i n g h a s b e e n r eq u es t ed

. Acco rd i n g l y

, t h i s

ap p eal i s DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t i f y t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. May 23, 2024

05/23/2024
# Official Journal C 274/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 274 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5015 November 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 274

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5015 November 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 274/01 | Final Annual Accounts of the European Communities — Financial Year 2006 — Volume I — Consolidated financial statements and consolidated reports on implementation of the budget | 1 |
| 2007/C 274/02 | The Court's statement of assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council | 130 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 274/01

Final Annual Accounts of the European Communities — Financial Year 2006 — Volume I — Consolidated financial statements and consolidated reports on implementation of the budget

1

2007/C 274/02

The Court's statement of assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council

130

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00113-Z-BR

§

WILLIAM SEAN GILMORE (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

WILLIAM SEAN GILMORE (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining WILLIAM SEAN GILMORE (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in 

Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that WILLIAM SEAN GILMORE (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) 

- POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and have sentence imposed accordingly. 

After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: February 8, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00113-Z-BR Document 33 Filed 02/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 67
Case 3:22-cv-02487-B Document 3 Filed 11/07/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 5
Case 3:22-cv-02487-B Document 3 Filed 11/07/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 6
Case 3:22-cv-02487-B Document 3 Filed 11/07/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 7
Case 3:22-cv-02487-B Document 3 Filed 11/07/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 8
Case 3:22-cv-02487-B Document 3 Filed 11/07/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

V. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-MJ-833 (01)

§

MELVIN KELLOUGH §

ORDER FOR DEFENDANT TO MAKE PAYMENT

TOWARDS APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FEES

The Court finds that funds are available from or on behalf of the above-named defendant for

payment of compensation and expenses of court appointed counsel for adequate representation, and

that the above-named defendant is financially able to make partial payment towards appointed

counsel representation.

It is therefore ordered that defendant shall pay $400 per month towards the cost of his court

appointed attorney, Derek Brown, who was appointed as counsel for the above-named defendant by

the undersigned. Said funds are to be paid into the Registry of the Court on the 15th day of each

month with the first payment due by November 7, 2022. The monthly payments will continue to

be due each month unless or until the defendant retains counsel1

 or until final disposition of the

case. These funds are to be deposited by the Clerk to the credit of the Treasury and for credit to the

said Criminal Justice Act appropriation.

Signed October 7, 2022

 

JEFFREY L. CURETON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Should defendant retain counsel prior to November 7, 2022 no payment will be required.

Case 4:22-mj-00833-BJ Document 10 Filed 10/07/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 11