alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000943323
<NAME>                        TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS FUNDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,555
<BONDS>                                        145,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,555
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,619
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0 <F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other
<F2>Includes general & administration and depreciation & amortization
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.18



 






Exhibit 10.18 (v)




December 15, 2004




Mr. Robert W. Mahoney

Diebold, Incorporated

3800 TABS Drive

Uniontown, Ohio 44685



Dear Bob:



This will confirm our recent conversation regarding your consulting services. Effective January 1,
2005, Diebold, Incorporated and you agree that your Retirement and Consulting Agreement is amended
by extending the “Consulting Period,” as defined in section 2a of that Agreement, such that the
“Consulting Period” now will terminate on December 31, 2005.



We very much appreciate your past consulting services and look forward to working with you during
the upcoming year.



If this letter accurately reflects our understanding, please indicate your agreement by signing
where designated below. I am including two signed originals of this letter so please sign both,
return one to me and keep one for your records. Again, thank you very much.



Sincerely yours,




DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED




/s/ Walden W. O’Dell

Walden W. O’Dell

Chairman of the Board

& Chief Executive Officer



WWO/ma




Accepted and Agreed by:



	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Robert W. Mahoney

	 	12/16/04
	 

	 	 
	Robert W. Mahoney

	 	Date
AFL 3-05 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.1



Aflac Incorporated 1st Quarter 2005 Form 10-Q


EXHIBIT 10.1


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

2004 AFLAC INCORPORATED

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


     Section 4(b) of the 2004 AFLAC Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows, effective as of May 2, 2005:

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, without amendment to the Plan, in the event of a Participant's death, Disability or retirement, (i) relax or waive any service-based or (except in the case of retirement) performance-based condition to the exercise of any Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted to the Participant, waive or amend the operation of Plan provisions respecting exercise after termination of employment or otherwise adjust any of the terms of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right, and (ii) relax or waive any service-based or (except in the case of retirement) performance-based condition to the vesting of any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit granted to the Participant or otherwise adjust any of the terms applicable to any such Award.


 




	
 
	
By:
	
  /s/ Joey M. Loudermilk

	
	
	

	
 
	
Name:
	
Joey M. Loudermilk

	
 
	
Title:
	
Executive Vice President, Corporate Secretary






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXH 10.1-1
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1042 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1042

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 issue regulations to require individuals conducting weapon screenings 
of passengers in air transportation to notify law enforcement officers 
of discoveries of controlled substances and/or sums of money in excess 
      of $10,000 in accordance with applicable Federal guidelines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

  Mrs. Byrne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 issue regulations to require individuals conducting weapon screenings 
of passengers in air transportation to notify law enforcement officers 
of discoveries of controlled substances and/or sums of money in excess 
      of $10,000 in accordance with applicable Federal guidelines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1.  NOTIFICATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OF DISCOVERIES OF 
              CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND/OR LARGE SUMS OF CASH IN EXCESS 
              OF $10,000 IN WEAPON SCREENING.

    Section 315 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. App. 
1356) is amended by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d) and 
by adding after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Discoveries of Controlled Substances and/or Cash in Excess of 
$10,000.--Not later than ninety days after the date of the enactment of 
this subsection, the Administrator shall issue regulations requiring 
employees and agents referred to in subsection (a) to report to 
appropriate Federal and State law enforcement officers any incident in 
which the employee or agent, in the course of conducting screening 
procedures pursuant to subsection (a), discovers a controlled substance 
the possession of which may be a violation of Federal or State law, 
and/or any sizable sums of cash in excess of $10,000 the possession of 
which may be a violation of Federal or State Law.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Johnie LONG v. STATE.

No. 21503.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 19, 1941.

J. R. Porter, of Clarendon, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of .the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and the waiver of a trial by jury, the court assessed his penalty at a fine of $50 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of ninety days.

Since his appeal was perfected, the appellant has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
. . ” 

I- OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS / 

3 AUSTIN 

Honorable W. X. UsClafB 

Orlninal DSstrlat AttornO~ 

Willlam8on Gountp 

GwJrgetom, fox88 

the An*nbios O@mnon 

rteo by the name 

T m-4. n. Q. st*pp. 

l rl Dwis) wa8 8 

. P. 0. s-pa, 

It4 lhrt Deer ’ 

their rather, 

3tepp is not rolrdea to the 

*Dais by blooii but br her m.aMtapp hew husbsnd. 

*Qucmtio,a: Dow the mpl@yZMnt by War. 

Marshall Davis, 8 &I mmber of the Board o? True 

tees, 0r Mrs. 811. Q. Btapp, violate Art. k32 of 

the Penal CObO?* 
iionorable W. XL &Ml&in, prim 2 

Artlolo C32, Penil Coda, prorlde8: 

wo 0rf20er of this steta or an7 ofriarr of 

av dirtriot, oouatp, olty, preolnet, 8ohool JIB- 

*riot, or other aualoipal 8ubdltlrioa or th28 

State or any oirioer or member of any Stett, 

dl8triot, oountJ, city, 8ehoo1 &irtrlot or other 

mualoipal board, Or jutlge ot uy oowt, areeta& 

by or under authority of w geaerel or 8pmlal 

law of thl8 State, or any number of l&o Legielatura, &all appoint, or rob for or oontizr the 

appolntmmt to aryr offloe, pooitfon, olorbhip, 

employment or duty, of w person related within 

the 8eoonb dogno by affinity or wlthln the third 

dogroe by oonsan@nlty to the psnoa 80 appointing or 80 voting or to w.other member of p9~r 

rwh board, tho &islatun, or oourt of whloh 

8noh parson 80 appointing or voting gun bo a pblc 

her, when 'the salary, fee8 or oompensatioa of 

auoh appointee i8 to be pefd for dirsotlr or indirectly, out of or Sroa ptiblio iand. or ties 

of oitiu or any kina or ohuuotar dmt~oe~~r. 

bet8 1909, p. 65, Aot8 1915, p. 149." 

It 18 at 01100 epparutt thab the father of Mar8hall 

Dar18 (the truoteo) and tho mothor of M-8. 8tapp's h-band hato 

a oomsoa anoestor in their father Mr. Davis. Mar8hall Datlr 

end X. Q. Sta p, boh&drroonde& ho8 a OOIPIYIE woo&or, are 

relate6 by oo f lateral oon8enguialtf. TBe method ot oomputhg 

thlr da&rem of relatlo&8hlp lr to begin with the eomoa aamt8tot 

and rrokoa downward. The degree t&e tw perrons or the more 

remote of them Is dtmtant fror the aaomtor lm the degree of 

klmhlp betrem thoa. T. P. B. B. 00. Y. Overtoa. 1 ADD. 0, 8.. 

Seotlon 553. 
Eoaorablm 1. IL YoOltin, m&e 3 

Thus, Manhall Dad8 and Y. cl. stapp aI.0 releted In the aeoond degree by roa8anwlnlt~. Degreor of 

aSrlolt,~ aro eomputcd In the man0 10~er a8 those Or OOQaengulnitq. Ol?inlon Ho. o-2&8 l%IatiStO Say-. 

Stapp is rolabd 1 the 8an0 tie& br ariinitjr to -11 

Davis 88 har hu8ba% ie relate4 to him br ooareBgUiI#t~. 

Slnoe Har8hall Dar18 aa& Y. Q. Stapp hare a ooamea gmoas~ar it is of no oiwuequtioe that .thOir rerpeetive 

mother an& Sathsr were ohly half brothor end 8i8ter. 

3016. 

O~in10q 

HO. 

Thl8 18, therefon, to adtime you, and it ir our 

oplnlon. that Sor the ZWSOn8 

8 

IVW MA thO80 Set forth in 

Oplnioa8 Hog. Q-2&8 sad O-301 , (aopiaa OS uhioh ati ~enel@ae&) 

yn. 8tapp. the tbcohOr, is ralat*l~to Nr. Da*is, the trwtoe, 

in the rooona &egrme by afSlnit;l and her employment i8 forbidden br ml010 C32. or the Poaal Cod.. 

Tours vary truly
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 221 ) IV-C-188 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Primed 11/13/2008 7:21:03 AM Sheet 221 of 232

### w P. 2 

# 1532 / A-81-H

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y

WASHINGTON , D.C . 20460 EE C J 2 189

1

OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N

Honorabl e Alfons e M . D'Amat o Unite d State s Senato r 125 9 Federa l Building P.O . Bo x 721 6 Syracuse , N

Y 13261-721 6 Dea r Senato r D'Amato : 

## * & £ V// J / Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Novembe r 14 , 199 1 lette r t o th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) regarding onboar d refueling vapo r recoverysystems . Yo u include d a lette r fro m you r constituent , Mr . Richar d K . Clark , expressing concer n tha t EPAdoe s no t inten d t o follo wthrougho n th e rulemaking a s require d an

d tha t cost s fo r Stag e I I system s woul d b e high . W e appreciat e Mr . Clark' s interes t o n thi s matter . EPAi s proceeding wit hthe rulemaking proces s fo r onboar d control s a s require d b yth e Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s o f 1990 . A s par t o f thi s process , Congres s directe d th e EPAt o consul t wit hth e Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) regarding onboar d systemsafety . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l HighwayTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA) , whic h i s par t o f th e DOT , release d a stud yo f onboar d systemsafet y i n Jul y1991 . W e ar e reviewing thi s stud yan d hav e place d a copyi n th e publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . W e als o hel d a hearing o n Septembe r 26t han d 27t hi n orde r t o solici t comment s fro

mth e publi c o n thi s issue . Writte n comment s wer e accepte d throughOctobe r 27th . Approximatel y3 0 writte n comment s wer e received . W e ar e i n th e proces s o f making the fina l determinatio n o n howt o procee d wit hth e rul e base d o n DOT' S conclusion s regarding safet yrisk s o f onboar d system s an d o n th e recor d develope d during th e commen t period . SDSB:Caro l Connell:256 5 Plymout hRoad:X8408:12-04-91:ID#999 W Las t Reviewe d b

yChe t Frances:12-04-91:Contro l No . AL-91-482 7 Reviewe d b

yDZinger:BJR:X7647:AR-455:12-04-91:Wan g NO . 2661 T

Printed on Recycled

PaperP. 3

-2
- Thank yo u fo r you r concer n i n thi s matter . You r lette r wil l b e include d i n the publi c docket . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t Do n Kopinsk i o f m ystaf f a t (313 ) 668-422 9 i f yo u requir e an

yadditiona l information .

Sincerel yyours , ORIGINA L SIGNE D B

Y RICHAR D D . WILSON- ^ Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s
cc : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:25 AM

To: 'grnsl@aol.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Inform ation: Max Jessurun (FAA-2015-1092)



### June 15, 2015

Dear Mr. Jessurun:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1092). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 29, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) CB&I Federal Services LLC, f/k/a Shaw )

Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W9128F-08-D-0009 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 58662, 58694

Steven M. Masiello, Esq. Shaun C. Kennedy, Esq.

McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Denver, CO Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney James M. Pakiz, Esq. Stanley E. Tracey, Esq.

Assistant District Counsel U.S. Army EngineerDistrict, Omaha ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties settled their disputes through mediation. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 11 March 2015

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA Nos. 58662, 58694, Appeals of CB&I Federal Services LLC, f/k/a Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### FRIEDL v. STATE.

No. 21383.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 15, 1941.

J. H. Letts and Leo C. Brady, both of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug; the punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 3:22-cv-00313-K-BT Document 8 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 32
Case 3:22-cv-00313-K-BT Document 8 Filed 12/02/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 33
Case 3:22-cv-00313-K-BT Document 8 Filed 12/02/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 34
Case 3:22-cv-00313-K-BT Document 8 Filed 12/02/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 35
Case 3:22-cv-00313-K-BT Document 8 Filed 12/02/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 36
Case 3:22-cv-00313-K-BT Document 8 Filed 12/02/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 37
#### Ambassador Associates et al., Appellants, v James P. Corcoran, as Superintendent of the New York State Insur*282ance Department, et al., Respondents.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered July 6, 1989, denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting defendant the Home Insurance Company’s cross motion for summary judgment, to the extent of declaring that the terms of a certain insurance policy do not require said defendant to, *inter alia,*"drop down” coverage for a loss of less than $11,000,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order of the same court, entered January 5, 1990, denying plaintiffs’ motion for renewal and/or reargument, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A fire at premises owned by plaintiffs, resulting in serious injuries to tenants therein, precipitated a separate action against plaintiffs seeking damages in excess of $25 million. Plaintiffs maintained a $1 million general liability policy with Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, a $10 million umbrella policy with Mission Insurance Company and a $15 million excess insurance policy with defendant Home. Plaintiffs, in their action for a declaratory judgment, sought summary judgment declaring that defendant Home was required to "drop down” the limits of its excess policy below the underlying amount of insurance of $10 million, due to Mission’s insolvency. Home sought summary judgment that the policy did not require that result.

Contrary to plaintiffs’ claims, the Home policy presents no ambiguities. It specifically provides Home would make payments on behalf of the insured in an amount in excess of the underlying insurance, set forth as $10 million, the amount of Mission’s policy. The agreement thereby fixes Home’s obligation at that amount. No other interpretation is reasonable, absent language that Home would pay losses on behalf of plaintiffs in excess of collectible underlying insurance. *(Zurich-American Ins. Co. v Mead Reinsurance Corp.,*161 AD2d 403; *Pergament Distribs. v Old Republic Ins. Co.,*128 AD2d 760, *lv denied*70 NY2d 607.) The phrase "other valid and collectible insurance” used in the policy definition of "Ultimate Net Loss” refers to other insurance as, for example, other excess insurance in the same layer of coverage, which would reduce the amount due under Home’s policy, not the underlying insurance. *(See, Pergament Distribs. v Old Republic Ins. Co., supra,*at 761.)

Plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Concur —Murphy, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Rubin, JJ. *[See,*143 Misc 2d 706.]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 71323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
October 3, 2000.

    In accordance with Sec. 71.5 of its rules regarding availability of 
information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on October 3, 2000.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
meeting of October 3, 2000, which include the domestic policy 
directive issued at that meeting, are available upon request to the 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 
20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and 
in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in 
the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent 
with maintaining the federal funds rate at an average of around 6\1/2\ 
percent.
    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, November 20, 2000.

Donald L. Kohn,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-30457 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2




SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FOR 2005



The following table sets forth the annual base salary for each of the named executive officers of
Beverly Enterprises, Inc (the “Company”) for fiscal year 2005, along with the percentage increase
over the base salary for fiscal year 2004:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Base Salary	 	 	% Increase	 
	William R. Floyd
	 	$	940,000	 	 	 	4.4	%
	Jeffrey P. Freimark
	 	$	457,000	 	 	 	3.3	%
	Douglas J. Babb
	 	$	445,000	 	 	 	3.2	%
	David R. Devereaux
	 	$	457,000	 	 	 	3.3	%
	Cindy H. Susienka
	 	$	416,000	 	 	 	8.1	%





In addition, under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan each of the named executive officers other
than the CEO have a target incentive award equal to 75% of his or her annual base salary, and the
CEO has a target incentive award equal to 125% of his annual base salary (the “Target Award”). The
actual bonus payable will range from 75% to 130% of the Target Award depending on the Company’s
performance in meeting financial, quality of care and corporate strategic goals. Assuming bonuses
at 119.5% of the Target Award (the percentage achieved in 2004), the average fiscal year 2005 bonus
for the named executive officers would increase by approximately 4.5% over the average actual bonus
for fiscal year 2004.