alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.03 RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gregg Buckbinder, Chief Financial and Operating Officer of Millburn
Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust
(the "Trust"), certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Millburn World
Resource Trust;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under whch such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and trust capital of the Trust as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

The Trust's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the Trust and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Trust, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Trust's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Trust's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Trust's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Trust's internal control over financial reporting; and

The Trust's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Trust's
auditors and the audit committee of the Trust's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Trust's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Trust's internal control over
financial reporting.

By:  /s/ Gregg Buckbinder
--------------------------
Gregg Buckbinder
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
November 11, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-200-1430-EQ] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Realty Action, Federal Land Policy and Management Act Section 302 Lease, in Lake County, Colorado. 

# SUMMARY:

                        All public land within the City of Leadville, Colorado is available for lease under Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 as amended, and the regulations thereunder 43 CFR part 2920 for authorization of historic commercial or residential use. Owners of qualified improvements may make application and after analysis they may be offered a 20-year lease to allow continued                               ( print page 70733)                            Public land use. They will be required to pay an annual rental based on a fair market appraisal.                     

# DATES:

Interested parties may comment on this action on or before Jan. 5, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Field Office Manager, Bureau of Land Management, 3170 East Main St., Canon City, CO 81212. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Hallock, BLM Realty Specialist, at the above address, e-mail dave_hallock@CO.BLM.gov, or phone: (719) 269-8536. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Typical qualified parcels are isolated remnants of Public land resulting from the patenting of mining claims (private land) that entirely surround the parcel. Additionally, the parcel is now overlapped by city lots and the parcel was developed prior to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and has been historically and unintentionally used for either commercial or residential purposes. 

Levi D. Deike, 

Field Office Manager, Royal Gorge Field Office. 

[FR Doc. 00-30129 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
#### TURNBOW et al. v. RICHARDSON et al.

No. 14120.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Feb. 21, 1941.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1941.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and R. E. Kepke and James Noel, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant State.

Edwin M. Fulton, of Gilmer, Hendricks Brown and Mike E. Powell, both of Fort Worth, and Trueheart, McMillan & Russell, of San Antonio, for appellant Turn-bow.

Florence & Florence, of Gilmer, for ap-pellees.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a suit in the form of trespass to try title, brought by S. E. Richardson and others against W. C. Turnbow, in which the State of Texas intervened as a party defendant. It is one of the four suits mentioned in W. C. Turnbow et al. v. J. F. Bland et al., 149 S.W.2d 604, on this day decided by us.

Except for the questions relating to the right of S. E. Richardson to maintain this suit, the controlling facts are the same as those in the Bland case, and the issues are the same. What we said in that case is decisive of this case, except as to the matters hereinafter referred to.

Appellants contend that S. E. Richardson failed to prove title in herself sufficient to authorize her* to maintain this suit, charging particularly that she failed to prove that she was married to J. D. Richardson, her deceased husband, at the time the land was deeded to him in 1901. Without detailing the evidence, we think it is entirely sufficient to 'prove such fact ; and even if it were not, she would be entitled to maintain the suit as against a trespasser on two other grounds: First, even if the land had been the separate property of her deceased husband, she would have had an interest in the land by inheritance; and second, she was in actual possession of the land as her homestead. A tenant in common may maintain an action to recover the whole of the land from one having no title. Taylor v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co., Tex.Civ.App., 2 S.W.2d 288, and cases, cited therein. What we said in the Bland case relative to the rights of those in possession to maintain suit in that case is applicable here.

All assignments of error are overruled.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

Motion for rehearing overruled per conclusions filed in W. C. Turnbow et al. v. J. F. Bland et al., Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W. 2d 604.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, OPERATIONS, AND CHANGES IN TRUST
CAPITAL AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,993,476
<SECURITIES>                                38,750,895
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,873,227
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,873,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,510,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,363,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,873,227
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            (1,892,394)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,066,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,012,893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,012,893)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (70.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (70.72)


</TABLE>
#### RHODES v. McDONALD, Chief Justice, et al.

Motion No. 16142.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 14, *1943.*

McGown, McGown, Godfrey & Logan and John M. Scott, both of Fort Worth, for the motion.

W. L. Coley, of Fort Worth, for Turner.

Callaway, Wade & Davis, of Fort Worth, for Home Ins. Co.

ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.

The relator has filed in this Court a motion for leave tO' file an original petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Court •of Civil Appeals at Fort Worth to certify .to the Supreme Court the points of dissent, as provided in Rule 463, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, in the case of Rhodes v. Turner, 171 S.W.2d 208. The majority of the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment of a county court at law for less than two hundred dollars. Chief Justice McDonald dissented. The petition for mandamus is based solely on the ground that there was a dissent by one of the justices of the Court of Civil Appeals.

From the facts stated in the majority and dissenting opinions we are of the opinion that the case turns upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment, a matter over which this Court has no jurisdiction. It follows that this case presents no question of law to be certified under the provisions of said Rule 463. Furthermore, there is nothing in the petition for writ of mandamus, or in such of the record as has been brought up in connection therewith, that leads us to believe that the majority opinion is incorrect. This Court will not do the useless thing of requiring the Court of Civil Appeals to certify a case to this Court unless it reasonably appears from the record that •if the motion for leave to file should be granted we would hold, upon a consideration of the motion on its merits, that the Court of Civil Appeals entered an incorhect judgment in the cause. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Gallagher, 127 Tex. 553, 94 S.W.2d 410, par. 2. Consequently the petition in this case lacks merit.

The motion for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus is overruled.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

  

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliancefor Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-MS1

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("WellsFargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year endingDecember 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

  

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
SUPPLEMENTAL CIVIL COVER SHEET FOR CASES REMOVED FROM STATE COURT Page 1 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-02161 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet For Cases Removed From State Court

This form must be attached to the Civil Cover Sheet at the time the case is filed in the U.S. 

District Clerk’s Office. Additional sheets may be used as necessary.

1. State Court Information:

Please identify the court from which the case is being removed and specify the number 

assigned to the case in that court:

Court Case Number

193rd Judicial District, Dallas County DC-22-10234 

2. Style of the Case:

USI Southwest, Inc. v. HUB International Insurance Services, Inc. 

Please include all Plaintiff(s), Defendant(s), Intervenor(s), Counterclaim(s), 

Crossclaimant(s), and Third Party Claimant(s) still remaining in the case and indicate their 

party type. Also, please list the attorney(s) of record for each party named and include 

their bar number, firm name, correct mailing address, and phone number (including area 

code.) 

Party and Party Type Attorney(s)

PLAINTIFF:

USI Southwest, Inc. 

Thomas B. Alleman 

State Bar No. 01017485 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC

1717 Main, Suite 4200 

Dallas, TX 75201 

(214) 698-7830 (Telephone) 

(855) 216-6218 (Facsimile) 

talleman@dykema.com

Case 3:22-cv-02161-S Document 1-5 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 32
SUPPLEMENTAL CIVIL COVER SHEET FOR CASES REMOVED FROM STATE COURT Page 2 

Party and Party Type Attorney(s)

DEFENDANT:

HUB International Insurance 

Services 

Greg K Winslett 

Texas Bar No. 21781900 

Jonathan A. Lautin 

Texas Bar No. 24092669

QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS,

 WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

(214) 871-2100 (Telephone) 

(214) 871-2111 (Facsimile) 

gwinslett@qslwm.com

jlautin@qslwm.com

3. Jury Demand: 

Was a Jury Demand made in State Court? Yes

If “Yes” by which party and on what date? 

Party Date

Plaintiff August 16, 2022 

4. Answer:

Was an Answer made in State Court? Yes

If “Yes” by which party and on what date? 

Party Date

Defendant HUB International 

Insurance Services 

September 29, 2022 

5. Unserved Parties:

The following parties have not been served at the time this case was removed:

Case 3:22-cv-02161-S Document 1-5 Filed 09/29/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 33
SUPPLEMENTAL CIVIL COVER SHEET FOR CASES REMOVED FROM STATE COURT Page 3 

Party Reason(s) for No Service 

N/A

6. Nonsuited, Dismissed or Terminated Parties:

Please indicate any changes from the style on the State Court papers and the reason for that 

change:

Party Reason 

None 

7. Claims of the Parties:

The filing party submits the following summary of the remaining claims of each party in 

this litigation:

Party Claims

Plaintiff: Plaintiff contends that Defendant breached its contract by failing to pay 

sums owed under the contract. 

Defendant: Defendant disputes all liability and alleges that if Plaintiff is still owed 

any money, another party is responsible. 

Case 3:22-cv-02161-S Document 1-5 Filed 09/29/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 34
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PACE Health Management Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John Pappajohn, Director and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




                                                         /s/ John Pappajohn
                                                       -------------------------
                                                         John Pappajohn
                                                         Director and Acting CEO
                                                         November 12, 2002


                                       13
#### PIPES v. STATE.

No. 22129.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1942.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1942.

Eugene F. Mathis, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for selling whisky in Lubbock County, a dry area, punishment assessed being a fine of $350.

The only bill of exception brings forward complaint because the court declined to instruct a verdict of not guilty. We are at some loss to get appellant’s viewpoint that the evidence is insufficient. It was admitted that Lubbock County was a dry area, and an inspector for the Liquor Control Board testified that he bought a pint of whisky from appellant and paid him $3 for it. No other witness testified.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Counsel for appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which he makes the same contentions as he made in the case of J. B. Fowler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 162 S.W. 2d 969, this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion overruling the motion for rehearing in that case, the appellant’s motion for rehearing in the present instance is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
RRS Aerial Media, LLC 15614 Cuttysark Street Corpus Christi, TX 78418 February 7, 2016 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave
., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 12842 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2091 Dear Sir or Madam: By letter dated September 14, 2015 from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) the request for exemption from Section 333 was granted. The letter is marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11314 Regulatory Docket No. FAA- 2014-0958. The petitioner, RRS Aerial Media, LLC, requests the granted exemption be amended to include the Dn S900. The 

### Dn S900 has a total weight of 8
.2Kg or 18
.llbs
. The dimensions are 900mm diagonally. The maximum speed is not listed in the aircrafts operating manual (AOM) but will not exceed 50mph
. The S900 has six motors, Motor Model S900-021 , powered by a 6-cell 

### lOOOOmAh or 15000mAh Lithium Polymer battery. There are six propellers in use, Propeller Model DJf S900-25. The petitioner, RRS Aerial Media, LLC, requests the granted exemption be amended to include a change 

### in address ofthe exemption holder to: RRS Aerial Media, LLC 15614 Cuttysark Street Corpus Christi, TX 78418 Thank you for your understanding
. Please feel free to contact me 

### ifyou have any questions regarding this request or need additional information. Sincerely,

robin.stotz@rrsaerialmedia
.com
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 172 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.172
                                         Agreed to July 31, 2009        

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946, when the House adjourns on the legislative 
day of Friday, July 31, 2009, Saturday, August 1, 2009, or Sunday, 
August 2, 2009, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, September 8, 2009, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
on any day from Thursday, August 6, 2009, through Tuesday, August 11, 
2009, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Tuesday, September 8, 2009, or such other time on that day as 
may be specified in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time 
of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
# C_2007078EN.01S00301.xml

| 11.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 11 April 2007, in Official Journal of the European Union C 78 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Second supplement to the 25th complete edition ’will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

Image

---