alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda

November 6, 2014

1:00 – 1:10 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance Office

1:10 – 1:15 New Business 

Certification of August 7, 2014 Meeting Minutes

1:15 – 2:05 Discussion of the Role of Cyber Insurance in Cybersecurity 

Presentation by Adam Sedgewick on National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework

Presentation by Catherine Mulligan (Zurich N.A.) on Security & Privacy 

Insurance Landscape

Discussion

2:05 – 2:15 Break

2:15 – 3:00 Discussion of the Affordability of Auto Insurance 

Presentation by J. Robert Hunter (Consumer Federation of America)

on the Cost of Mandatory Auto Insurance for Lower Income 

Households

Discussion

3:00 – 3:50 Discussion of International Supervisory Standards for Insurers, 

Including Capital

Presentation by Tom Finnell (Federal Insurance Office)

Discussion of Workstreams of the International Association of 

Insurance Supervisors

Discussion of Insurance Capital Standards (ICS) and the 

U.S. Proposal on ICS 

Discussion of EU-U.S. Insurance Project

3:50 - 4:00 Discussion of Subcommittees

4:00 Adjourn

Federal Insurance Office

Advisory Committee on Risk-Sharing Mechanisms

Agenda

August 12, 2019

1:30 – 1:45 p.m. Welcome & Opening Remarks

• Steven Seitz, Director, Federal Insurance Office

• Mike Sapnar, Committee Chair, TransRe

1:45 – 2:15 p.m. Treasury Update on Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Activities

• Bimal Patel, Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions

• Richard Ifft, Senior Policy Analyst, Federal Insurance Office

2:15 – 2:30 p.m. Direct Insurance Market Update

• American Property Casualty Insurance Association

• National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies

2:30 – 2:45 p.m. Reinsurance Update

• Reinsurance Association of America

2:45 – 3:00 p.m. Break

3:00 – 3:15 p.m. Capital Markets Update

• Fermat Capital Management

3:15 – 4:15 p.m. Discussion of Future Committee Activities

4:15 p.m. Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70550-70554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29931]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01-01]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 01-01 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: November 16, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[[Page 70551]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO00.000


[[Page 70552]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO00.001


[[Page 70553]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO00.002


[[Page 70554]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO00.003

[FR Doc. 00-29931 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
#### MULDROW v. STATE.

No. 21275.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1940.

A. A. Kern, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is rape. The punishment assessed is death.

The only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

The State’s testimony, briefly stated, shows that in the early afternoon of April 23, 1940, three negroes appeared at the home of Sam D. Grogan during his absence and by force had sexual intercourse with Mrs. Grogan. While in the Grogan home and after the commission of the alleged offense they took a locket, a lavalier and a black alarm clock and then left. Soon after the three culprits had left Mr. Grogan returned to his home and found his wife crying, nervous and hysterical. She informed him of what had occurred and he immediately notified the officers. Appellant was arrested about 6:30 P.M. He made a voluntary confession which was reduced to writing. The clock was found between the bedding of his bed and the locket and lavalier were also recovered.

A doctor who examined Mrs. Grogan soon after the occurrence discovered evidence of the penetration of her female organ. A few days later he examined her again and found evidence characteristic of shankeroids, venereal in origin. One of the three defendants was afflicted witlr gonorrhea and shankeroids. The victim definitely identified appellant as one of the three negroes who had outraged her, as charged in the indictment.

Appellant did not testify. He filed a plea for a suspension of sentence in the event of his conviction and proved by his father that he had not been theretofore convicted of a felony in this or any other state. He did not offer any testimony exonerating him or tending to mitigate the offense. Consequently, the only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

Upon a most careful review of the record we reached the conclusion that the evidence is sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant urges again that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. We have reexamined the facts. There seems to be not the slightest reason which could raise even the vaguest doubt about appellant’s guilt.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69787-69788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on November 9, 2000, a proposed Consent 
Decree in United States v. 150 Acres of Land, More or Less, Civil 
Action No. 5:95 CV 1009, was lodged with the United States District 
Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
    The Consent Decree settles an action brought under Section 107 of 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability

[[Page 69788]]

Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601, et seq., (``CERCLA'') for the recovery of 
past costs incurred by the United States in responding to releases or 
threatened releases of hazardous substances at the Bohaty Drum Site, 
located in Medina, Ohio. The proposed settlement set forth in the 
Consent Decree addresses the liability of five Claimants to the 
defendant Site, each of which owns an undivided interest in the Site. 
Under the terms of the proposed decree, the Settling Claimants will pay 
the United States a total of $100,000 in settlement of the United 
States' past costs claims against the defendant Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
Consent Decrees. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611, and should 
refer to United States v. 150 Acres of Land, More or Less, D.J. Ref. 
90-11-2-1108.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the United 
States Attorney, Northern District of Ohio, 1800 Bank One Center, 600 
Superior Avenue East, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, and at United States 
Environmental Protection Agency Region V, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604. A copy of the proposed consent decree may also 
be obtained by mail from the Department of Justice Consent Decree 
Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $8.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.

Bruce S. Gelber,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-29540 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
ex10a.htm






























Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 34 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) and Amendment No. 457 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.


 


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


October 1, 2015
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00255- CR

Eli B lue Hernandez, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 147 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 10- 2069 73, H ONO RAB LE CLIF F ORD B ROW N, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N Appellant Eli Blue Her

n an d ez pleade d guilty to the offe nse of possession of a controlled substance, coca ine, and the district court place d him on defe rre d-adjudication community supervision for a period of eight year s. Sub s eq u en t ly , the S tate filed a mot ion to proce ed with an adjudication of guilt, based, in part, on an alleg ation that Her nandez had committed the subsequent criminal offe nse of possession of a controlled substance. Her nandez pleade d true to the alleg ations 1 in the motion to adjudicate and was sentenc ed to f ive year s’ imprisonment. Hesubsequently filed
a pro se notice of appea l from the judgme nt adjudicating guilt. How ever, the district court has

Her nandez’s appea l of his conviction for the subsequent offe nse was separ ately 1 dockete d under appellate cause number 03-13-00256- CR. That appe al was dismiss ed beca use the district court had cer

tified that it was a plea- barg ain case , the defe ndant had no right of appea l, and the defe ndant had waived the right of appeal. See Hernande z v. State , No. 03-13-00256- CR, 2013 Tex. App. L EXI S 7553 (Tex. App.—Austin J une 21, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).now cer

tified that Her

nandez has waived the right of appea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a) (2), (d). Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose Dismissed Filed: Mar ch 28, 2014 Do Not Publish

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THECHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
Herbert W. Bursch, Chief Executive Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)       
          The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2005, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
          The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp,
          Inc.

|Date:  November 7, 2005 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By: /s/ Herbert W. Bursch      
      Herbert W. BurschIts: Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 173 ) ll-E-13 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:09 AM

Sheet 173 of 264P. 2

M MRR . 25.1998. , 10:04flM j M _ , SHAKESPEAR

E 03/24/S 9 17:1 B •tfl91»»4iutJ 4 PE S RT P N C NO.11 9 P.|,oo2/00 2 

## A 

## 9 4 5 2 

# H-C-/33 " Contac tRepor t Rober t Jemison , Pacific Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) March24,199 8 l ~ ~ ' 

## CCT- " 11 

## m From : Date : Contact : Mr . Joh n J . Pric e Company : Shakespear e Electronic s & Fiberglas s Divisio n Telephon e Number : (803)276-550 4 Fa x Number : (S03 ) 276-280 9 Contac tSummary : Mr . John J . Pric e wa s contacte do n behal f of th e U.S . EP

A t o updat e informatio n provide d i n th e 199 3 EP

A Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Screening Surve y submitte db y Shakespear e Electronic s & Fiberglas s Divisio n fo r thei r facilit y locatedi n Newberry , Sout h Carolina . I n respons e t o my question s Mr . Pric

e indicate dth e following: Th e facilit y use s th e filament

winding proces s i n th e fabrication o f fishing rod s an dantenna s for recreational industrie s andlight pole s fo r th e utilit y industry . Th e polyester

resi n use ddurin g thi s fabricatio n proces s contain s approximatel y 33 % HA P b y weigh

t anddoe s no t

contai n avapo r suppressant . Th e only HA

P initiall y presen t i n th e resi n i s styrene . N o additiona l HA P i s adde d t o th e resi n durin g th e fabricatio n proces s wit h th e exception o f

small amount s o f

HA P that ma y (o r ma y not ) b e presen t

i n initiators , promoter s and/or catalyst s adde

dt o tiie resin . Th e facilit

y use s th e pultrusio n proces s i n th e fabricatio n o f

variou s custo mproducts . Example s o f

thes e product s include doo r an dwindo w sill s for

th e constructio n industry . Th e polyeste r resi n use dduring thi s fabricatio n proces s contain s approximatel y 3VA HAP b y weigh

t an d doe s no t contai n avapo r

suppressant

Th e onl y HA P initially present

i n th e resi n i s styrene . N o additional HA P i s adde dt o th e resi n durin g th e fabricatio n proces s with th e exceptio n o f smal l amount s o f

HA P tha t ma y (o r ma y not ) b e presen

t i n initiators , promoter s and/or catalyst s adde d t o th e resin .

INFORMATIO N I S ACCURAT E
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Harvey Beker, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn Ridgefield
Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.


/s/ Harvey Beker
--------------------------
Harvey Beker
Co-Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2006
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1058

To amend title 10, United States Code, to allow members of the Selected

Reserve to use educational assistance for graduate programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to allow members

of the Selected Reserve to use educational assistance

for graduate programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR GRADUATE

4 PROGRAMS FOR MEMBERS OF THE SE5 LECTED RESERVE.

6 Section 2131(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code,

7 is amended by striking out ‘‘other than’’ and all that

8 follows through ‘‘level.’’ and inserting in lieu thereof a

9 period.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service.

# ACTION:

Public notice.

# SUMMARY:

Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service proposes to award an extension of an existing concession contract to the current concessioner authorizing the continued operation of Nauset Knoll Motor Lodge facilities and services for the public at Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts for a term of one year from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 27, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Park Service, Concession Management Program, Boston Support Office, 15 State Street, Boston, MA 02109-3572, Telephone (617) 223-5209.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This contract extension is being awarded to The Benz Corporation, Orleans, Massachusetts. It is necessary to award the contract extension in order to avoid interruption of visitor services. 

This action is issued pursuant to 36 CFR part 51.23. This is not a request for proposals and no prospectus is being issued. Park planning documents call for the future conversion of the Nauset Knoll Motor Lodge to Government use. 

Dated: October 30, 2000.

Chrysandra L. Walter, 

Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.

[FR Doc. 00-30150 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1121 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1121

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain 
 agricultural workers from the withholding of income taxes from wages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1993

  Mr. Rogers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain 
 agricultural workers from the withholding of income taxes from wages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL WORKERS FROM WAGE 
              WITHHOLDING REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 3401(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining wages) is amended by inserting before 
the semicolon at the end the following: ``for services performed by an 
employee who is not described in section 13(a)(6) of the Fair Labor 
Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)(6))''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to remuneration paid after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40427 USDC No. G-96-CV-710

LUIS A. AGUILAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus HECTOR GARCIA; JOHN FLORES; JEFFREY MILSTEEN; DONNA KLIGAR; WILLIAM WILKINS; JAMES BISSETT, Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

--------------------- December 18, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1 Luis Aguilar seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) from this court following the magistrate judge’s denial of leave to proceed IFP and certification that Aguilar’s appeal would not be taken in good faith. Aguilar seeks a transcript of his pretrial hearing at government expense; his transcript motion is DENIED. He seeks appointment of counsel on appeal; his motion is
DENIED. Aguilar contends that the magistrate judge erred by denyinghis motion for appointment of counsel. He argues that he was

psychologically incapable of prosecuting his case pro se and that the magistrate judge erred by denying his requests to subpoena expert psychiatric witnesses to testify about his mental state. He argues that the magistrate judge erred by failing to order the Galveston County Jail to furnish the names and addresses of all of the psychiatrists who had seen him while he was in the custody of the County. He alleges that he was indigent during the trial of his case and that he unsuccessfully attempted to employ private counsel. Aguilar contends that the magistrate judge erred by denying his request for an expert witness in the field of document forgery. We have reviewed Aguilar’s IFP motion and the record on appeal and we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Regarding Aguilar’s requests that two psychiatrists by subpoenaed as expert witnesses and that a psychiatric expert and a forgery expert be appointed, the district court was not authorized to pay expert witness fees. Pedraza v. Jones , 71 F.3d 194, 196 (5th Cir. 1995). Regarding Aguilar’s remaining contentions, we affirm the bad-faith certification and deny Aguilar’s IFP motion for essentially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Aguilar v. Garcia , No. G-96-CV-710 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 1998). IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.