alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 2016 (the Servicing Agreement), by and between Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Santander
Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC, and the related Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule (Publicly Registered Transactions), dated as of June 28, 2017 (the Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule, together
with the Servicing Agreement, the Subservicing Agreement), during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Subservicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the
subject of the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Jose RamirezName:

Jose RamirezTitle:

Vice President of Servicing for Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico, LLCDate:

March 30, 2018
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

NATHANIEL KING §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-929-P

§

§

DALLAS-FORT WORTH §

INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, §

§

Defendant. §

DEFENDANT DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL 

AIRPORT BOARD’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Defendant, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board (“DFW”), moves for an order 

of final judgment against Plaintiff Nathaniel King (“Plaintiff”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 58 and in accordance with the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (EFC No. 41). 

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, DFW respectfully requests that the Court 

grant its Motion for Entry of Final Judgment, that a final order be issued in this case disposing of 

all parties and claims, and that Plaintiff’s lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 

Case 4:22-cv-00929-P Document 42 Filed 10/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2115
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT Page 2 of 2

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Caroline C. Harrison

Caroline C. Harrison 

State Bar No. 24046034

charrison@phamharrison.com

Spencer M. Mainka

State Bar No. 24116707

smainka@phamharrison.com

PHAM HARRISON, LLP

505 Pecan Street, Suite 200

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

(817) 632-6300

(817) 632-6313 – Fax

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby acknowledges that a true and correct copy of the above-mentioned 

document was served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on this the 6th day 

of October, 2023, on counsel for Plaintiff as follows:

Wes Dauphinot 

Law Offices of Wes Dauphinot, P.C.

900 West Abram

Arlington, Texas 76103

wes@dauphinotlawfirm.com

Hani F. Kobty

Kobty Law Firm

900 West Abram

Arlington, Texas 76103

hani@kotbylawfirm.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Caroline C. Harrison

Caroline C. Harrison

Case 4:22-cv-00929-P Document 42 Filed 10/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2116
#### LEVINGSTON v. STATE.

No. 26044.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant,

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $100 upon a charge of possessing intoxicating liquor in a container to which no- tax stamp was affixed.

The statement of facts is in narrative form and indicates that certain exceptions were taken to the introduction of testimony but there are no bills of exception in the record to bring these complaints before this court.

The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction and we find no other matter presented- for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SERAFINA LICCARDI,

 Plaintiff,

v.

IAN SHORR; PARAMOUNT 

PICTURES/VIACOM; JEFF BEZOS; 

AMAZON PRIME VIDEO; and 

AMAZON.COM WORLDWIDE 

DISTRIBUTION, 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 3:22-cv-02423-K-BT

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated 

December 11, 2023. The Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the 

proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were 

made. The objections are OVERRULED. 

The Court also warns Plaintiff that she could be subject to sanctions, including 

monetary sanctions and an injunction preventing her from filing additional lawsuits, 

if she persists in filing duplicative and vexatious lawsuits. Courts possess the inherent 

power “to protect the efficient and orderly administration of justice and . . . to 

command respect for the court’s orders, judgments, procedures, and authority.” In re 

Case 3:22-cv-02423-K-BT Document 47 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 527
2

Stone, 986 F.2d 898, 902 (5th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). Included in this inherent 

power is “the power to levy sanctions in response to abusive litigation practices.” Id. 

Sanctions may be appropriate when a pro se litigant has a history of submitting 

multiple frivolous claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Mendoza v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d 191, 

195-97 (5th Cir. 1993). Pro se litigants have “no license to harass others, clog the 

judicial machinery with meritless litigation, and abuse already overloaded court 

dockets.” Farguson v. MBank Hous., N.A., 808 F.2d 358, 359 (5th Cir. 1986).

Including this one, Plaintiff has filed at least five lawsuits in this District, and 

all of them have been dismissed upon a finding of frivolity, failure to prosecute, or 

failure to state a claim. See Case Nos. 3:16-cv-02537-S-BT (dismissed with prejudice 

with leave to amend denied on futility grounds); 3:21-cv-00314-E-BH (dismissed for 

failure to properly serve defendants); 3:21-cv-02590-E-BH (dismissed for failure to 

prosecute or comply with a court order); and 3:23-cv-00485-E-BN (dismissed with 

prejudice as time barred). This is Plaintiff’s third lawsuit dismissed with prejudice, 

and her second alleging infringement of the same material by these same defendants. 

The Court warns Plaintiff that if she persists in filing frivolous, duplicative, and 

Case 3:22-cv-02423-K-BT Document 47 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 528
3 

vexatious lawsuits, she could be subject to sanctions, including monetary sanctions 

and an injunction preventing her from filing additional lawsuits related to this one.

SO ORDERED. 

Signed January 3rd, 2024.

 

______________________________ 

ED KINKEADE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02423-K-BT Document 47 Filed 01/03/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 529
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 17

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to Federal budget

procedures.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DARDEN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to

Federal budget procedures.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid only

6 if ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

7 States within seven years after its submission to the

8 States for ratification:
2

HJ 17 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Before the beginning of each fiscal year,

3 Congress shall adopt a statement of receipts and outlays

4 for that year, in which total outlays are not greater than

5 total receipts. The Congress may amend such statement,

6 but revised outlays shall be no greater than revised re7 ceipts. Whenever three-fifths of each House of Congress

8 deems it necessary, Congress in such statement may pro9 vide for a specific excess of outlays over receipts by a vote

10 directed solely to that subject. Congress and the President

11 shall ensure that actual outlays do not exceed the outlays

12 set forth in such statement.

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. Total receipts for any fiscal year set

14 forth in the statement adopted under this article shall not

15 increase by a rate greater than the rate of increase in na16 tional income in the calendar year ending not less than

17 six months or more than 12 months before the first day

18 of such fiscal year, unless a majority of each House of

19 Congress passes a bill directed solely to approving specific

20 additional receipts and such bill becomes law.

21 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress may suspend the provisions of

22 this article for any fiscal year in which Congress has made

23 a declaration of war.

24 ‘‘SECTION 4. For purposes of this article, total re25 ceipts includes all receipts of the United States except
3

HJ 17 IH

1 those derived from borrowing, and total outlays includes

2 all outlays of the United States except those for repayment

3 of debt principal.

4 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall take effect with re5 spect to the second fiscal year beginning after the date

6 on which this article is ratified.

7 ‘‘SECTION 6. Congress may enforce and implement

8 this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3305; Amendment #1] 

In accordance with notices received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated November 8 and November 16, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to include Pinal County and the Gila River Indian Community in the State of Arizona as a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding, and to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning on October 21, 2000 and continuing through November 8, 2000. 

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the contiguous county of Graham, Arizona may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. All other contiguous counties have been previously declared. 

All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is December 26, 2000 and for economic injury the deadline is July 27, 2001. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.) 

Dated: November 20, 2000.

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-30262 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Eddie THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 24284.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 1, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is an assault to murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

Appellant has filed a motion duly verified by him in which he requests this court to dismiss his appeal.

The motion is granted and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Page 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

§ 

§ 

§ CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-357-K (01)

§

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

VS. 

ZAVEN DEMOND SNEED §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry 

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation 

Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto 

having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), 

the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by 

the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and the Defendant is hereby 

adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Signed November 15th, 2023.

_____________________________ 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00357-K Document 26 Filed 11/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 39
·' 

_i~~~~~~~~ -. . ~~ ~='.: _-t.f-~a-j~i¥ ~ . .J.-~·"t:f·:~- :~-::-l1L~~ ·-. -!":".- ,_. ·-

-::·--.-

•"::~~·--·~---

!:~+=:

•• :..,-~.-~.c ·;·;_" --~:-~~- :_-=-;;:_:~.--.~----i~.-',-~·~: • .:..:.._·_:,.._· L_!!~ "-'-::·~-~~-~.~·t_·._; _--

__ ~:t_~-:_-_:_._~f-h_,_·~·~; 

r-::.-

__ ·.-.·~-~.·:_~ --~ ... ·~-~.--~-=~~---.1 _ . ·.:_ ~~-'_:.·_,_:~.-~X:;'i,JL,~--~•. :13_~-~-·;·· •. ;~-,·_.: ·, .. ~.~~~-~-~ .. '-.··:. __ ~ ... •.. :._.,·-·,~.-~~.··.' - ~ -- - -: ~..,~.:-

~-~:-~,-

--~~~- ~
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valrico Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. E. McLean, III,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ J. E. McLean, IIIJ. E. McLean, III
Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2003
# L_2009021EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 21/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 21/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Case 3:22-cr-00342-E Document 139 Filed 05/02/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 388
Father’s Day 2014

Father’s Day events have a dual purpose: To provide fun activities to support the bonding of
fathers and their children and to connect fathers to economic development resources. To host the
celebrations, PHAs partner with federal agencies, nonprofits, and local businesses, offering on-
site information and services such as employment resources, healthcare consultation and legal
counseling. In some cities, participants meet athletes from the NFL and NBA, while others
receive free books from organizations such as First Book and Read it LOUD. Celebrations
feature activities from moon bounces to reading booths, focusing on celebrating fatherhood,
family and dads in staying connected with their children.

In line with HUD’s 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Goal 3: “using housing as a platform to improve
the quality of life of our residents,” the focus on fatherhood in public housing flows from current
statistics that show fathers are absent. The majority of public housing households with children
are headed by single women who earn less than $9,000 annually. While fathers are often present
in and around public housing developments, most of them are not officially on the household’s
lease and are often disconnected from services that could lead to economic stability for
themselves and their children.

The first year HUD kicked-off the Father's Day initiative in 2011, 209 PHAs from 33 states held
Father’s Day events that combined supportive services with promoting fatherhood to strengthen
families. An estimated 22,000 fathers, children, mothers and many others participated in events
that local public housing authorities held all over the nation.

“Children with involved fathers grow up happier, healthier and better prepared to succeed in
life,” said HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan, himself a father of two. “Yet every night, one-out-of
-three American children goes to bed in a home without a father present. These events will bring
fathers and their children together and connect the dads to the social and economic resources
they need to be the best parents they can be.”

In 2013, over 300 housing agencies in 33 States participated in Father's Day and partnered with
other organizations including the NFL, NBA, Boys & Girls Club of America, and the NFI, an
organization created in 1993 to raise the awareness of the importance of fathers. Together, these
groups are delivering a clear message — America needs dads. Public Housing Agencies can
register to participate in Father's Day by going to www.hud.gov/fathersday . Ron Ashford
notes: “We know men in our communities are not always integrally connected to services. One
of the key goals in HUD’s Father’s Day Initiative is to help connect men to resources that can
improve their lives and the lives of their families. Some fathers may need help with job training
or employment resources, others with access to health services.”

Federal partners include the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, United States Department of Agriculture and the Departments of Education and
Justice.
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT MATTHEW PAUL MARIN VERSUS 

### NO. 2023 CW 0828 FRANCIS W. GUIDRY, JR. AND FICTITIOUS PARTIES, A,B AND C 

### OCTOBER 10, 2023 In Re: BEFORE: 

### Francis W. Guidry, Jr., applying for



### writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Tangipahoa, No. 210001629. McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT PMc CHH SMM 

### supervisory Parish of
**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting, November 18th, 2014**

**Attendance List**

1
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1264

To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to reduce the minimum

downpayment required for a mortgage on a 1- to 4-family residence

located in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, or the Virgin Islands to be eligible

for mortgage insurance under such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1993

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend section 203 of the National Housing Act to reduce

the minimum downpayment required for a mortgage on

a 1- to 4-family residence located in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, or the Virgin Islands to be eligible for mortgage

insurance under such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 203(b)(2)(B)(iii) of the National Housing

4 Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(2)(B)(iii)) is amended by insert5 ing after ‘‘(iii)’’ the following: ‘‘in the case of a property

6 located (I) in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, or the Virgin Is-
2

•HR 1264 IH

1 lands, 95 percent of such value in excess of $125,000, and

2 (II) in any other State,’’ .

Æ