alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              79
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                       129
<INVENTORY>                                     35,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,210
<PP&E>                                           2,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                     669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,025
<SALES>                                         25,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,193
<CGS>                                           17,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,454
<INCOME-TAX>                                       987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### Leo SAUNDERS, Appellant v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 21640.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 28, 1941.

D. T. Moore, of Aquilla, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of the offense of burglary, the jury assessed his punishment at two years’ confinement in the State Penitentiary.

Since his appeal was perfected, the appellant has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2019

No. 04-19-00764-CV

Nancy ALANIS,

Appellant

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for the Pooling and 

Servicing Agreement Dated as of October 1, 2006 Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC 

Trust 2006-NC3 Mortgages Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006 NC3, Mackie Wolf Zientz & 

Mann, PC, and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-03042

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 31, 2019, appellant filed an “Amended Notice of Appeal and/or Motion to 

Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal and Notice of Plea to the Jurisdiction.” Because 

appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed, this court has jurisdiction to consider the appeal, 

and appellant’s motion to extend time is DENIED AS MOOT. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plairtiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-098-01-H

JOSE RAMON CASTILLO-LOPEZ,

Defendant.

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Repon and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

0 636OXl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

oateanrre l?,zozl.

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

UN STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AIYD RECOMMENDATION

OF TTIE UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,JILTY

Case 5:22-cr-00098-H-BQ Document 45 Filed 06/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 126
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Dominguez, Also Known as Victor Fernandez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered on May 11, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of five years to life, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part C (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the 
Statement of Organizations, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of 
the Department of Health and Human Services (45 FR 67772-76, dated 
October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, October 20, 1980, as 
amended most recently at 65 FR 68144, dated November 14, 2000) is 
amended to revise the functional statement of the Division for AIDS, 
STD, and TB Laboratory Research (DASTLR), National Center of Infections 
(NCID).
    Section C-B, Organization and Functions, is hereby amended as 
follows:
    Delete the functional statement for the Division of AIDS, STD and 
TB Laboratory Research (HCRN) and insert the following:
    Division of AIDS, STD and TB Laboratory Research (HCRN). (1) 
Develops and evaluates laboratory methods and procedures for the 
diagnosis and characterization of infections caused by human 
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other retroviruses, other sexually 
transmitted diseases (STDs), and mycobacteria including Mycobacterium 
tuberculosis; (2) provides laboratory support for the surveillance, 
epidemiologic, and clinical activities of the National Center for HIV, 
STD, and TB Prevention (NCHSTP); (3) conducts applied research on the 
pathogenesis of and the immune mechanisms that occur in microbial 
infections; (4) conducts laboratory studies of hemophilia and other 
coagulating disorders; (5) provides reference laboratory services and 
assists in standardizing and providing laboratory reagents; (6) serves 
as a World Health Organization Collaborating Center; (7) conducts 
epidemiologic studies of HIV-infected and uninfected persons with 
hemophilia and their families; (8) assists in designing, implementing, 
and evaluating prevention and counseling programs for HIV-infected 
persons with hemophilia and their families; and (9) coordinates 
research on opportunistic infections occurring in HIV-infected persons.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
Jeffrey P. Koplan,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-30217 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
Message from the Secretary of the Treasury 

Dear Member: 

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 President's Budget capitalizes on Treasury's ongoing drive for 

efficiencies and improves stewardship of taxpayer dollars by focusing on the Department's core 

financial responsibilities. The Budget requests $12.3 billion for Treasury's operating bureaus 

and $1.4 billion for our international programs. 

Consistent with the Administration's priorities, the Budget provides increased resources for the 

Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to 

combat terrorist financing, proliferation financing, and other forms of illicit finance. These 

additional resources will be deployed to economically isolate North Korea, stand up the Terrorist 

Financing Targeting Center in Saudi Arabia, implement the Countering America's Adversaries 

Through Sanctions Act, and counter the financial networks that support terrorists, organized 

transnational crime, weapons of mass destruction proliferators, and other threats. As Chair of the 

Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), I also look forward to working 

with Congress to strengthen national security by bolstering the CFIUS review process. 

The Budget includes $11.1 billion for the Internal Revenue Service from base discretionary 

appropriations to collect more than $3 trillion in revenue and continue administering the first 

comprehensive tax reform legislation in over 30 years, which delivers tax cuts to families, makes 

the tax code simpler and fairer for everyone, and makes American businesses more competitive. 

In addition, the Budget requests new and continuing investments funded through a program 

integrity cap adjustment to strengthen the enforcement of tax law, returning $28.8 billion to 

taxpayers over ten years. 

The Budget includes reform proposals that were identified as directed in the Executive Order on 

a Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch. Treasury's reform plan includes 

proposals that will drive efficiency and effectiveness within the Department and across 

government. Reflecting the significant breadth and depth of the Department's mission, 

Treasury's reform plan aims to consolidate overlapping functions within Treasury and with other 

agencies, modernize program administration, and streamline organizational structures and 

management layers. 

The FY 2019 Congressional Budget Justification includes the information required for the 

Annual Performance Report. I have validated the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of the 

performance data in this report. 

Sincerely, 

Steven T. Mnuchin 
Department of the Treasury – Budget in Brief
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 21907.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1942.

C. F. Sentell, of Snyder, and T. L. Price, of Post, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge

Willie Williams was charged with the theft of two white hogs from Aubrey Stokes and, upon conviction, was given three years in the penitentiary.

The owner of the hogs was engaged in buying and selling hogs and cattle and lived on the outskirts of the town of Snyder. Appellant lived nearby and, to a limited extent, engaged in the same business. The owner’s pens became flooded and he turned his hogs out to range until the water from the creek went down. After about a week they disappeared and he finally learned that another hog buyer had bought them from appellant. When confronted with the charge appellant agreed to pay for the hogs, which he finally did, but not until the matter had been reported to the officers.

Appellant’s only defense is that he bought the hogs for $7.50 from a negro boy who lived several miles away and who has a twin brother so much like him that appellant could not say which one he bought them from. The party was not called as a witness by either side and there is ample evidence and circumstances upon which the jury was justified in disregarding the story which appellant gave.

The record is before us without bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular in every respect and the jury has decided the only question in the case.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,017,393
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,433
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,038,197
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,038,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,875,000
<COMMON>                                    16,910,544
<OTHER-SE>                                 (17,758,618)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,038,197
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31,126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, and CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC31 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do
hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been
made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.

|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
#### Town of Webb, Respondent, v Sisters Realty North Corp. et al., Appellants, and F. Eugene Romano et al., Respondents.

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to appellants, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in denying respondents’ motion to amend an order of condemnation covering a large tract of land near Old Forge in the southern Adirondacks; thus, the first and third ordering paragraphs of the order on appeal must be vacated. Petitioner acquired the land by eminent domain for snowmobiling and other recreational uses, but failed to provide a sufficiently precise metes and bounds description of the property *(cf., Drew v Swift,*46 NY 204).

A metes and bounds description is a description of land whose boundaries are indicated by a series of "calls”, each of which is composed of a course or direction and a distance, starting at a beginning point and closing at the same point. The beginning point may be established by a monument or may be derived by reference to a nearby monument (6A Powell, Real Property 899 [2], at 81A-94—81A-95; *see also,*Pedowitz, Real Estate Titles, at 205-209 [NY St Bar Assn 1984]). It is well established that in a condemnation case there must be no uncertainty in the description of the property to be taken and that the property to be taken must be ascertainable from the description in the petition itself without resort to extrinsic evidence *(Bell Tel. Co. v Parker,*187 NY 299, 303).

*897The description used here begins at the corner of a lot that has never been surveyed and most of the courses and distances are expressed in terms of lot lines, without any reference to angles, specific distances, or physical monuments. Further, the description at several points fails to describe a course or distance but merely refers to boundaries set forth in deeds. There are also exceptions described in terms of deeds. Those parts of the perimeter and exceptions cannot be located definitely from the acquisition map and the description, as required by EDPL 402 (B) (3) (b) and (c).

The lack of precision of this description is also manifested in the fact that the acquisition map indicates that parcel I, including the railroad, consists of about 7,510 acres, yet in 1985, when the same parcel was licensed for use by petitioner, the parties agreed that the premises consisted of about 8,400 acres. Although the town’s attorney has averred that any surveyor or anyone familiar with the property could locate the beginning point, no surveyor or appraiser has so stated. The condemnees’ appraiser has averred that he cannot prepare an accurate appraisal without being able to ascertain the exact quantity of land being taken.

We do not reach petitioner’s arguments concerning waiver and timeliness because they are raised for the first time on appeal. The court having denied respondents’ motion to fix a valuation date, there is no determination of that issue before us to review. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Shaheen, J.—condemnation.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Digital Applications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Patrick Soon-Hock Lim, Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
--------------------------
Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2007
#### Frank N. ROMINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22345.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 18, 1942.

C. R. Carpenter, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has presented his verified application for permission to withdraw his appeal. Finding the same in proper form, his request is granted and the appeal is withdrawn.
#### FEDERAL UNDERWRITERS EXCHANGE v. THOMPSON.

No. 7722.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 27, 1940.

Motion for Rehearing Dismissed March 26, 1941.

James F. Parker, of Kountze, and Gordon, Sharfstein, Bell & Weinert and John L. Bell, all of Beaumont, for plaintiff in error.

R. A. Richardson, of Kountze, and D. F. Sanders and John A. Veillon, both of Beaumont, for defendant in error.

CRITZ, Justice.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. It was filed in the District Court of Hardin County, Texas, by D. A. Thompson against Federal Underwriters Exchange to recover compensation for injuries resulting from a hernia alleged to have been received by Thompson while working in the course of his employment for Peavy-Moore Lumber Company. Federal Underwriters Exchange was the Lumber Company’s compensation insurance carrier. The Industrial Accident Board rendered a final award adverse to Thompson in toto, thereby refusing him any compensation whatever. Thompson appealed to the district court, where he contended for and was awarded a judgment against the above-named insurance carrier as for a general injury. On appeal this judgment was affirmed by the Beaumont Court of Civil Appeals. 137 S.W.2d 106. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals makes a correct and comprehensive statement of the facts and issues involved. In the interest of brevity we refer to that opinion for a further statement.

A reading of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in connection with our opinion in National Mutual Casualty Company v. Thomas. Jefferson Lowery, 148 S.W.2d 1089, this day decided by this Court, will disclose that the question as to whether Thompson should be compensated as for general injuries, is decided in favor of Thompson by our opinion in the Lowery case just mentioned. The ruling of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is in harmony with our ruling in the Lowery case, supra.

*1093We are in accord with the Court of Civil Appeals on the other question discussed by it.

The judgments of the district court and the Court of Civil Appeals are both affirmed.