alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 


LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT (this “License
Agreement”) is made as of the 2nd day of May, 2005, by and
between GECKO Inc., a New Jersey corporation (“Licensee”), and Monster
Worldwide, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Licensor”).


 


WHEREAS, Licensee
and Licensor are parties to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase
Agreement”) made as of the 2nd day of May, 2005, by and among
Licensee, George R. Eisele, Daniel S. Collins and Licensor;


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements of the parties set forth in this License Agreement and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.             It is understood
and agreed that the license set forth in Section 8.2 of the Stock Purchase
Agreement shall also apply to the “globe logo” mark owned by Licensor (covered
by United States Trademark Registration No. 2,151,853), provided that the
license in this paragraph 1 relating to the globe logo shall be effective only
during a transition period of six (6) months and shall accordingly terminate on
November 2, 2005.


 


2.             Except as
specifically set forth in paragraph 1 above, all the provisions of Section 8.2
of the Stock Purchase Agreement (including without limitation the quality
requirements; quality control provisions; review rights; termination
provisions; and disclaimer of representations, warranties and obligations)
shall apply to the license set forth in paragraph 1 above.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this License Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  GECKO INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ George
  R. Eisele

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: George
  R. Eisele

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:   Chairman of the Board

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  MONSTER
  WORLDWIDE, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Myron F.
  Olesnyckyj

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Myron
  F. Olesnyckyj

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:   Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70922-70923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public as indicated 
below,with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan 
to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should inform the 
Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH.
    Date: December 7, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: The topics proposed for discussion include but are not 
limited to: (1) sharing biomedical research resources; (2) a status 
of guidelines on research using stem cells; (3) implementation of 
recommendation of ACD on the Office of Medical Applications of 
Research; and (4) a report of the Working Group on Extramural 
Construction.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, Building 
31, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    Contact: Ms. Janice C. Ramsden, Special Assistant to the 
Principal Deputy Director, NIH, National Institutes of Health, 
Building 1, Room 333, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b61793e39634b656263256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="107a62252278507e79783e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>, 
Telephone: (301) 496-0959.


[[Page 70923]]


    Dated: November 16, 2000.
LaVerne Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30164 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 81

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
          repealing the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

Mr. Owens of New York introduced the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
          repealing the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid for all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United 
States is repealed.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### B. M. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22063.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1942.

No attorney for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Forgery is the offense; the punishment, two years in the state penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, and prays that the appeal be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed at the request of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

BRIAN G. OATMAN, §

No. 2097131 §

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § NO.7:22-CV-101-O

§

KYLE W. BURROSS, §

ET AL., §

Defendants. §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

By order signed February 17, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff, Brian G. Oatman, to 

complete and file a questionnaire to provide further information regarding the claims he is 

asserting. The order cautioned that failure to comply might result in the dismissal of Plaintiff’s 

claims without further notice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of 

counsel and for “federal restraining order,” which the Court denied, advising Plaintiff that he did

not need the assistance of counsel to complete the questionnaire, which requires only that Plaintiff 

provide facts within his personal knowledge. The responses to the questionnaire were due March 

10, 2023. Despite having had ample opportunity to respond, to date Plaintiff has failed to comply 

with the order. The Court finds that no lesser sanction than dismissal would be appropriate. 

Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution.

SO ORDERED this 27th day of March, 2023.

Case 7:22-cv-00101-O Document 10 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2593, MM Docket No. 00-131; RM-9897]


Digital Television Broadcast Services; Dozier, AL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Alabama Educational 
Television Commission, licensee of noncommercial television station 
WDIQ-TV, substitutes DTV channel *11 for DTV channel *59 at Dozier, 
Alabama. See 65 FR 46684, July 31, 2000. DTV channel *11 can be 
allotted to Dozier at coordinates (31-33-16 N. and 86-23-32 W.) with a 
power 1.0, HAAT of 383 meters, and with a DTV service population of 231 
thousand. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective January 9, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-131, adopted November 22, 2000, and 
released November 24, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.


    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334. 336.


Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Alabama, is amended by removing DTV channel *59 and adding DTV 
channel *11 at Dozier.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-30013 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Agenda – November 2011 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings Friday, October 28, 2011 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, October 

24, 2011 to Debt.Management@treasury.gov and Mark.Cabana@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not 

scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

 Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 Low/High 

 October – December 2011 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 January – March 2012 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 FY 2012 Total Marketable Borrowing 

 FY 2013 Total Marketable Borrowing / 

 FY 2014 Total Marketable Borrowing / 

 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

 FY 2012 / 

 FY 2013 / 

 FY 2014 / 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

 3-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 10-year note (November) / 

 10-year note reopening (December/January) / / - / 

 30-year bond (November) / 

 30-year bond reopening (December/January) / 

 2-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 5-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 7-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 10-year TIPS reopening (November) 

 5-year TIPS reopening (December) 

 10-year TIPS (January) 

 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates 

 52-week bill size (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 Total change in bills outstanding 11/11-1/12 / 

 Total change in bills outstanding FY 2012 / 

 CMB issuance November ‘11 – January ‘12 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2012 and FY2013. Do you believe the 

current auction schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s expected financing needs? 

2. In February, the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee suggested that Treasury should consider 

issuing floating rate notes (FRNs). Please comment on the optimal structure for such a product, how it 

would affect Treasury’s overall cost of borrowing, and whether you expect robust market demand for 

such a product. 

3. In recent months, a number of Treasury bill auctions have closed with an interest rate of zero. In 

addition, a number of Treasury bills have traded at negative rates in the secondary market. Going 

forward, should Treasury consider allowing negative rate bidding in bill auctions?
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of Khang Gia Holding, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge
that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2015 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Andy Nguyen
                                 President
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 13, 2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wesley Jeremiah, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered January 3, 1989, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. At trial, the People introduced into evidence, in relevant part, the defendant’s statement to the police in which he admitted that he shot the victim in self-defense, as well as eyewitness testimony concerning the shooting. Consequently, defense counsel’s trial strategy was to concede that the defendant shot the victim, but to assert the defense of justification. This court will not, with the benefit of hindsight, second-guess an attorney’s losing trial strategy, even where, as here, it included an admission to the actual shooting and the unlawful possession of the gun used to shoot the victim *(see, People v Glover,*165 AD2d 880; *People v Sullivan,*153 AD2d 223, 227; *see also, People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798; *People v Torres,*164 AD2d 923). Under the circumstances of this case, the defense counsel’s representation of the defendant, when viewed in its entirety, was meaningful *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396; *People v Stephens,*
      *459161 AD2d 740). Lawrence, J. P., Keeper, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL ANTHONY GOODLOE, JR. §

§

v. §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-2064-S-BH

ZAVIOUS HOGAN and NFN SHING §

§

ORDER

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in 

this case. See ECF No. 6. No objections were filed. The Court has reviewed the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED January 6, 2023.

 ____________________________________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02064-S-BH Document 7 Filed 01/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 192 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 192

 Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to information on AIDS 
              and HIV infections, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

  Mr. Nadler submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to information on AIDS 
              and HIV infections, and for other purposes.

Whereas 315,390 cases of AIDS have been documented and more than 194,300 AIDS-
        related deaths have resulted in the United States;
Whereas the AIDS crisis is a national epidemic resulting in at least 40,000 new 
        HIV infections annually in the United States;
Whereas many adults and adolescents are not being provided thorough and easily 
        accessible AIDS education in order to prevent the contraction of the 
        disease; and
Whereas improved education and prevention efforts to adolescents as well as 
        adults have been shown to reduce the likelihood of contracting AIDS: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) all States should provide quality education in school 
        sex education programs respecting--
                    (A) AIDS, and
                    (B) HIV infections,
            (2) the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 
        Surgeon General should develop guidelines for the prevention of 
        AIDS and HIV infections and should distribute such guidelines 
        for parents and their children,
            (3) the television and motion picture industry should 
        encourage the use of condoms in movies, television shows and 
        public service announcements,
            (4) advertisements for condoms should be encouraged, and
            (5) the National Commission on AIDS should be reinstituted.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             995
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             461
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,625
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     13,870
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,035
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,069
<LOANS>                                        145,179
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,358
<DEPOSITS>                                     140,132
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,552
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,767
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 171,358
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,896
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,035
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,931
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,115
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,131
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,800
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,386
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,386
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       582
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    403
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,145
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,145
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,145
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            255
        

</TABLE>
#### Credit Car Leasing Corp. et al., Appellants, v Elaine Litwer et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Edwards, Jr., J.), entered on June 20, 1989, which denied plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4403 for an order rejecting the report of Special Referee Donald Diamond dated November 7, 1988, and granted the motion to confirm, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

*320By orders entered on June 23, 1987 and October 16, 1987, respectively, the issues of (1) whether defendant Litwer is a stockholder in plaintiff corporation in violation of a May 1987 order and (2) whether such conduct actually defeated, impeded, impaired and prejudiced the rights of plaintiff, were referred to the Special Referee for a hearing. After a lengthy hearing Special Referee Diamond concluded that defendant Litwer is a 25% owner of plaintiff corporation. He did not reach the other issues, the plaintiffs having failed to present any evidence as to them.

The plaintiffs argue that their evidence should be accepted and the evidence of the defendants rejected as incredible. Credibility questions are for the Referee *(Kardanis v Velis,*90 AD2d 727) and we find no reason to disturb the credibility determinations of the Referee, who was in a better position than this court to determine credibility. *(See, e.g., Clean Rental Servs. v Karten,*146 AD2d 462.)

Defendants contend that defendant Litwer acquired her 25% interest in plaintiff corporation by reason of an agreement with plaintiff Gray to exchange that interest for unearned sales commissions. Plaintiffs contend that evidence of such agreements is barred by the Statute of Frauds pertaining to sale of business (General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [10]) and pertaining to transfer of securities (UCC 8-319). Defendants have not, however, presented evidence of an executory contract, but rather evidence of a completed and existing business relationship whereby defendant Litwer was a 25% owner of plaintiff corporation. Plaintiffs’ argument that the option was revoked by defendant Litwer’s inconsistent conduct was rejected as incredible and we perceive no basis to disturb this determination.

We have reviewed the remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.