alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00326-L

§

CHADRICK ALEX (22) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

CHADRICK ALEX is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 18 U.S.C. 2, namely, Possession 

With Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the 

Court's scheduling order. 

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 21st day of October, 2024. 

 ________________________________________ 

 SAM A. LINDSAY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 591 Filed 10/21/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1877
Case 6:22-cr-00025-H-BU Document 33 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 68
Case 6:22-cr-00025-H-BU Document 33 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 69
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0270 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 -NM - 1 13 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

SECRETARY O F T HE TREASURY 

The Honorable Jolm A. Boelmer 

Speaker 

U.S. House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Speaker: 

WASHINGTON, D .C . 

March 17, 2015 

I am writing to notify you, as required under 5 U.S.C. § 8348(h)(2), of my determination that, by 

reason of the statutory debt limit, I will be unable to invest fully the Government Securities 

Investment Fund (G Fund) of the Federal Employees' Retirement System in interest-bearing 

securities of the United States, begi1ming today, March 17, 2015. The statute governing G Fund 

investments expressly authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to suspend investment of the G 

Fund to avoid breaching the statutmy debt limit. Both my predecessors and I have taken this 

suspension action during previous debt limit impasses. By law, the G Fund will be made whole 

once the debt limit is increased. Federal retirees and employees will be unaffected by this action. 

I respectfully urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting to 

increase the statutory debt limit as soon as possible. 

Sincerely, 

Jacob J. Lew 

Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader 

The Honorable Harry Reid, Senate Democratic Leader 

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader 

cc: The Honorable Paul Ryan, Chairman, House Committee on Ways and Means 

The Honorable Sander M. Levin, Ranking Member, House Committee on Ways and 

Means 

The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance 

The Honorable Ron Wyden, Ranking Member, Senate Conunittee on Finance
# Official Journal C 354/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.354.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 354 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 543 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.354.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 354

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 543 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2011/C 354/01 | Corrigendum to the Twelfth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment (OJ C 9, 13.1.2011) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2011/C 354/01

Corrigendum to the Twelfth Annual Report according to Article 8(2) of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment (OJ C 9, 13.1.2011)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
RE: EO 13563 Review: Interagency Comments on MATS Reconsideration Higgins, Cortney to: RobertJ Wayland, Bill Maxwell
11/15/2012 09:17 AM Cc: Karen Thundiyil

Hi Bob and Bill, Here’s a graph of the heat rate date from EIA for the Nucla unit.

From: Higgins, Cortney Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:09 PM To: Bob Wayland (Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov); maxwell.bill@epa.gov Cc: Karen Thundiyil Subject: EO 13563 Review: Interagency Comments on MATS Reconsideration

Hi Bob and Bill,

Attached are the interagency comments on the MATS reconsideration (a redline of the preamble and a word file). For the call tomorrow, I’d
like to focus on the comments in the Word filed titled
“MATSReconsideration...”There are also additional comments on the 11/6 RTI Memo for the Floor Analysis – I can walk you through those comments tomorrow at the end of

our call.

I should be in the office by 9 am – please give me a call if you have any questions.

Regards,
Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins, PhD Policy Analyst
OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856 chiggins@omb.eop.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Langston Block, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant argues that the evidence of physical injury was not sufficient to support the conviction for assault in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]). The police officer testified that, in the scuffle with defendant, he suffered scrapes and bruises on his legs and bruises on his knees. He sustained bite wounds to the left shoulder, which broke the skin and caused him "nagging pain” for several days until they began to heal. The officer was given oxygen at the scene, then transported to the hospital emergency room, where he reported that he hurt "all over”. He was given a tetanus shot and pain medication, and he missed the following two days of work. In our view, that evidence is sufficient to support the conviction for second degree assault *(see, People v Lundquist,*151 AD2d 505, 507, *lv denied*74 NY2d 849; *People v Williams,*147 AD2d 960, *lv denied*73 NY2d 1023; *cf., People v Prosser,*130 AD2d 972).

We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the prosecutor provided racially neutral reasons for exercising peremptory challenges to two potential black jurors *(see, People v Hernandez,*75 NY2d 350, 355, *cert granted*— US —, 112 L Ed 2d 201). Whether defendant was so intoxicated as to be unable to form a criminal intent was a question of fact for the jury, and the jury’s resolution of that issue in favor of the prosecution is supported by the evidence *(see, People v Lang,*143 AD2d 685). We have examined the remaining issues raised by defendant and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—assault, second degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

 v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States, et al., 

 Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE SCOPE OF 

THE COURT’S PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO 

TACTICAL MACHINING’S PENDING CLASSIFICATION REQUEST

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Clarification of the Scope of the Court’s 

Preliminary Injunction with Respect to Tactical Machining’s Pending Classification Request. 

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is 

GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that ATF may complete its classification of the partially machined 

AR-15 pattern receiver sample that Tactical Machining Submitted to ATF on April 12, 2022, 

provided that the Government takes no adverse action against Tactical Machining in the event that 

the Product is classified as a “firearm” pursuant to either of the provisions that the Court has 

determined likely are unlawful in VanDerStok v. ATF, No. 4:22-CV-00691-O, 2022 WL 4009048

(N.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2022).

//

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 71-1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 953
2

Signed this ________________________, 2022.

 _________________________________________________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REED O’CONNOR

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 71-1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 954
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000943323
<NAME> TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS FUNDING, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,555
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,555
<BONDS>                                        145,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,555
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,856
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other
<F2>Includes general & administration and depreciation & amortization
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Ehrich, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Richard A. EhrichRichard A. EhrichInterim Chief Financial OfficerAugust 08, 2016
Warrant Instrument









Contents 1 . 1 .1 1 .1 .1 1 F  I  F  F       1 1 .1











This Warrant Instrument By   141-  re_fo • .&c.tid   200-   Midatech Pharma PLC, "Company").   Background: This Warrant Instrument witnesses Definitions and interpretation "Act" "Admission" "Adjustment Event" "AIM" "Approved Reconstruction" "Articles" the "Auditors" "Business Day" "Capitalisation Table" "Certificate" "Conditions" "Controlling Interest"











"Directors" "Excluded Issue" "Expiration Date" "Fair Market Value" "Group" "Group Company" "Holder Consent" "Holder(s)" "Holder" "Insolvency Event" "Notice of Exercise" "Ordinary Shares" "Register"




kV..











In witness this Warrant Instrument




Schedule 1 Midatech Pharma PLC (the "Company") "Warrant Instrument"). EXECUTED DEED Executed Deed Midatech Pharma PLC


Schedule to the Certificate "Company") "Warrant Instrument"), Notice Of Exercise To Part A Part B











Notes:











Schedule 2 Definitions Register holder is entered in Transfer of Warrants











Exercise of Subscription Rights ("Nomad") Adjustment Provisions "Adjustment Event")






















General   23. If a Notice of Exercise is cancelled or is deemed to have been revoked pursuant to Condition 19, and Automatic exercise on failure to give notice   24. Automatic exercise upon the Expiration Date   25. shall be on AIM Representations, warranties and covenants of the Company Capitalisation Table is true and complete as at the date of this Warrant Instrument; Information and rights of Holder(s)











Restrictions on the Company in all Instrument.   Modification of Rights




Replacement of Certificates not Notices Holder Company











printed.   Third party rights Governing law and jurisdiction English











Schedule 3









Executed Deed Midatech Pharma PLC iti . A444/445 - e Me-9144-r.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4205

_____________________________
R ODNEY A LSTON J ACOBS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Gary L. Bergosh , Judge

. March 21, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R AY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Talla hassee
, for Appellee.
#### DAVIDSON v. STATE.

No. 21957.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1942.

Polk Shelton, of Austin, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

• BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The record is before us without any caption or certificate showing when the term of court convened and when it ended. We find among the papers of the case some typewritten copies evidently intended to show this fact, but they are not connected with the transcript and are not certified to by anyone. They will not be considered.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18
(Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the small business issuer), hereby
certifies as follows:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
the small business issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small business issuer.



Dated this 15th day of August, 2005.

/s/ Mary Jo RogersMary Jo Rogers, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CDFI FY2022 President's Budget 

Request Summary of Capital 

Investments

$000,000s DME O&M DME O&M DME O&M DME O&M

Agency Agency Total Agency Agency Total Agency Agency Total Percent Agency Agency Total

Capital Investments Total 6.756 2.787 9.543 5.350 2.944 8.294 5.552 3.087 8.639 4% 5.552 3.087 8.639 

non-Major IT sub-total 6.756 2.787 9.543 5.350 2.944 8.294 5.552 3.087 8.639 4% 5.552 3.087 8.639 

IT Total 6.756 2.787 9.543 5.350 2.944 8.294 5.552 3.087 8.639 4% 5.552 3.087 8.639 

CDFI non-Major IT Investments

Award Management Information System 6.756 2.757 9.513 5.350 2.914 8.264 5.552 3.057 8.609 4% 5.552 3.057 8.609 

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

6.756 2.757 9.513 5.350 2.914 8.264 5.552 3.057 8.609 4% 5.552 3.057 8.609 

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund 

Public Website

- 0.030 0.030 - 0.030 0.030 - 0.030 0.030 0% - 0.030 0.030 

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

- 0.030 0.030 - 0.030 0.030 - 0.030 0.030 0% - 0.030 0.030 

Total

FY 2020 Actuals 

Obligations

FY 2021 Estimated 

Obligations FY 2022 Estimated Obligations

FY 2022 Budget Authority 

Request 

Total Total Total

Change 

from CY 

to BY

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Summary of Capital Investments Page 1 of 1 6/2/2021
|  | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Midatech Pharma PLC (the “Company”); |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 4. | The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporitng (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the Company and have: |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 5. | The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 6, 2017 | /s/ James N. Phillips   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                | James N. Phillips       |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |

----