alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 James Bell
James Bell is the Founder and Executive Director of the W. Haywood Burns Institute. Since 2001, Mr. Bell has been spearheading a national movement to address racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system. The Burns Institute, which is named after civil rights pioneer W. Haywood Burns, was recently awarded the prestigious MacArthur Award for Creative and Effective Institutions. The award is presented to select organizations worldwide that have made a "remarkable impact in their fields." Mr. Bell is also a member of the Discipline Disparities Research to Practice Collaborative and co-authored one of the three briefs recently released by the Collaborative. That brief is focused on effective interventions in schools.
  
Date Created: July 10, 2020
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40411

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISIDRO TORRES-MONTOYA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-984-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isidro TorresMontoya has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres-Montoya has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40411 Document: 00513804975 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-40411

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40411 Document: 00513804975 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Zimbler, the Chief Executive Officer of Steam Cleaning USA, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   June 10, 2003


--------------------------
James W. Zimbler
President


<PAGE>
TTB 4.1 Table

(values in $millions)

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency Externa

Capital Investments Total 0 0 16.335 1.357 17.692 0 0 17.644 1.341 18.985 0 0 

Major IT sub‐total

non‐Major IT sub‐total 0 0 16.335 1.357 17.692 0 0 17.044 1.341 18.385 0 0 

IT Total 0 0 16.335 1.357 17.692 0 0 17.044 1.341 18.385 0 0 

non‐IT Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0.6 0 0 

TTB Total 0 0 16.335 1.357 17.692 0 0 17.644 1.341 18.985 0 0 

Major IT sub‐total

non‐Major IT sub‐total 0 0 16.335 1.357 17.692 0 0 17.044 1.341 18.385 0 0 

IT Total 0 0 16.335 1.357 17.692 0 0 17.044 1.341 18.385 0 0 

non‐IT Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0.6 0 0 

TTB Major IT Investments

TTB non‐Major IT Investments

TTB EA, CPIC and CIO Functions 0 0 1.054 0 1.054 0 0 1.089 0 1.089 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 1.054 0 1.054 0 0 1.089 0 1.089 0 0 

TTB General Support Services 0 0 1.263 0 1.263 0 0 1.316 0 1.316 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 1.263 0 1.263 0 0 1.316 0 1.316 0 0 

TTB IT Infrastructure End User Systems and Support

(ITI EUSS)

0 0 2.898 0.906 3.804 0 0 2.872 0.952 3.824 0 0 

015‐05‐1881 Community Development Financial

Institutions Fund Program Account

0 0 0 0.906 0.906 0 0 0 0.952 0.952 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 2.898 0 2.898 0 0 2.872 0 2.872 0 0 

TTB IT Infrastructure Mainframes and Servers

Services and Support (ITI MSSS)

0 0 4.138 0.315 4.453 0 0 3.986 0.309 4.295 0 0 

015‐05‐1881 Community Development Financial

Institutions Fund Program Account

0 0 0 0.315 0.315 0 0 0 0.309 0.309 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 4.138 0 4.138 0 0 3.986 0 3.986 0 0 

TTB IT Infrastructure Telecommunications (ITT TSS) 0 0 2.939 0.136 3.075 0 0 2.884 0.08 2.964 0 0 

015‐05‐1881 Community Development Financial

Institutions Fund Program Account

0 0 0 0.136 0.136 0 0 0 0.08 0.08 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 2.939 0 2.939 0 0 2.884 0 2.884 0 0 

TTB Regulatory System 0 0 1.96 0 1.96 0 0 2.387 0 2.387 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 1.96 0 1.96 0 0 2.387 0 2.387 0 0 

TTB Tax System 0 0 2.082 0 2.082 0 0 2.51 0 2.51 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 2.082 0 2.082 0 0 2.51 0 2.51 0 0 

DME 

PY 2013 Funding (Estimated Actuals) CY 2014 Funding (Estimated Operating Levels) B

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

TTB 4.1 Page 1 of 2 
TTB 4.1 Table

(values in $millions)

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency Externa

DME 

PY 2013 Funding (Estimated Actuals) CY 2014 Funding (Estimated Operating Levels) B

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

TTB non‐IT Investments

TTB Scientific Equipment Refresh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0.6 0 0 

015‐13‐1008‐0 TTB Salary and Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0.6 0 0 

TTB 4.1 Page 2 of 2
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Friday, March 2, 2007 Meeting March 2, 2007
U.S. Department of Education
Barnard Auditorium
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance
  
Date Published: March 2, 2007
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
O rder filed March 27 , 20 12

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 12

- 00 043

- CV

____________

ALVIN ROY d/b/a ROYAL GRAFIX FINE ART , Appellant

V.

INSGROUP d/b/a BUSINESS INSURANCE GROUP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 68850



### O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed January 13, 2012

. To date, the filing

fee of $175.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence

has been filed. See Tex. R. App . P

. 20.1. Therefore, the c ourt issues the following order.

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the Clerk of

this c ourt on or before April 10 , 20 12

. See Tex. R. App . P. 5. If appellant fails to timely

pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
#### PROUTT v. STATE.

No. 21435.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1941.

Earl Shelton, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Travis County on a charge of murder and his punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The proceedings appear regular, and the facts are sufficient to warrant the conviction. No bills of exception or. statement of facts are presented and there is nothing for this court to consider.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Maria Queen
Maria Queen is HUD Liaison for Federal Interagency Youth Programs at HUD's Office of Public and Indian Housing, where she has served for 23 years. In this capacity, she advocates for the well-being of youth and young adults living in poverty. She also serves as Community and Supportive Services Grant Manager for the Choice Neighborhoods and HOPE VI Housing Revitalization Programs, where she is responsible for working with Public Housing Authorities across the country to administer resident and community services programs for low-income families. Ms. Queen represents HUD on several Federal interagency working groups that focus on families and children, including the Interagency Working Group on Youth Programs, the White House Forum on Youth Violence Prevention, the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the White House Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative's Building Neighborhood Capacity Program. Ms. Queen graduated from the University of the District of Columbia with a Bachelor's degree in business/marketing.
  
Date Created: July 10, 2020
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
Case 4:22-cr-00265-P Document 19 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 30
Case 4:22-cr-00265-P Document 19 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 31
EXHIBIT
32.1




WRITTEN
STATEMENT




PURSUANT
TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




The
undersigned, Jay H. Schecter, the Chief Executive Officer of Accountabilities,
Inc., and Stephen DelVecchia, Chief Financial Officer of Accountabilities, Inc.
(the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify that, to the best
of their knowledge:




(i)
the Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2009
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
February 12, 2010


By:   /s/
      Jay H. SchecterName:
      Jay H. SchecterTitle:
      Chief Executive OfficerBy:   /s/
      Stephen DelVecchiaName:
      Stephen DelVecchiaTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification accompanies the Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Department’s Web site at: http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/

regs/cmt-investmentadvicefinalrule.html.

e-ORI@dol.gov (e

eRulemaking portal at http://

www.regulations.gov. Persons

charge, online at http://

www.regulations.gov and

http://

www.dol.gov/ebsa a

 e-ORI@dol.gov (e

eRulemaking portal at http://

www.regulations.gov. Persons

charge, online at http://

www.regulations.gov and

http://

www.dol.gov/ebsa a

http://www.regulations.gov.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHARLES E. WATERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1689 

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 1977CF000177B.

Charles E. Waters, Crawfordville, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
(logo)Deutsche Bank

1761East St. Andrew Place

SantaAna, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel714 247 6000

Fax714 247 6009 

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT ASTO COMPLIANCE

 

DBWF 2015-LCMMortgage Trust

 

Theundersigned, duly authorized officers of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Trust andServicing Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among,Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland loan Services, ADivision of PNC Bank National Association, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, and Custodian, here bycertifies in accordance with Section 11.07 of the Agreement:

 

A)     Areview of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the “reporting period”) and of such Certifying Servicer’sperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervisionand

B)     That,as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, suchCertifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, inall material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

DEUTSCHEBANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

asCertificate Administrator

 

 

/s/Ronaldo Reyes 

BY:Ronaldo Reyes 

Title:Vice President

Date:March 1, 2019

 

/s/Karlene Collins

BY:Karlene Collins

Title:Assistant Vice President 

Date:March 1, 2019
Exhibit 10.B



 






Exhibit 10(b).




[On Michael J. McMennamin’s Huntington Bancshares Incorporated Letterhead]




January 27, 2005




Mahesh Sankaran

[Address]



Re: Payment Upon Termination of Employment




Dear Mahesh:




     This letter confirms Huntington Bancshares Incorporated’s (hereinafter “Huntington”) offer to
compensate you in the event your employment is terminated by Huntington without cause on or prior
to February 28, 2006. As we have discussed, in order to help ensure a smooth transition into new
employment, Huntington has agreed to provide you with the following payments if your employment
terminates without cause on or prior to February 28, 2006.



     1. Because you will not be eligible for a 2005 Management Incentive Plan (MIP) bonus payment
if your employment terminates prior to the date payment is made in 2006, Huntington agrees to pay
you one hundred thirty-seven thousand five hundred dollars ($137,500), which is an amount
equivalent to the 2005 MIP bonus target that you would be eligible to receive if you were actively
working on the day of bonus payment. This bonus will be paid to you at the same time bonuses are
paid to all active associates, and all applicable withholdings and deductions will be made from the
bonus payment at the time it is paid.



     2. Huntington agrees to pay you two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000), minus
all applicable withholdings and deductions, which is an amount equal to your annual salary. This
amount will be paid to you within thirty (30) days of your last day of employment with Huntington.



     As previously noted, these payments will be made in the event your employment is terminated
without cause by Huntington on or prior to February 28, 2006. For purposes of this Agreement,
the term “Cause” is defined to be identical to the definition contained in your Executive
Agreement. Please note that if a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Executive Agreement) of the
Corporation occurs on or prior to February 28, 2006, your eligibility for benefits under this
Agreement will cease, and your right to benefits upon termination of employment will be governed
solely by your Executive Agreement. Please also note that nothing in this Agreement alters or
changes your at-will employment status with Huntington.



     I believe that the above information accurately reflects the agreement we reached regarding these
payments. If you agree, please sign below acknowledging your agreement and acceptance of these
payment terms.



     Mahesh, I want to again express how excited we are to have you join our team. We look
forward to the start of your employment with Huntington.



	 	 	 
	

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 
	

	 	/s/ Michael J. McMennamin
	

	 	Michael McMennamin

Vice Chairman





I agree that I have read this letter in its entirety, fully understand it, and am in full accord
and agreement with the terms contained herein.




	 	 	 
	January 28, 2005

	 	/s/ Mahesh Sankaran
	Date

	 	Mahesh Sankaran







75
CAPHRA Meeting with EPA

February 7, 2013, 1:00 pm

List of Participants

Name Organization

1. Ed Scollon OPP/HED

2. Derek Gammon FMC

3. Vicki Dellarco OPP/IO

4. Susan Little CSPA/PIR

5. Neil Ahle Bayer An. Hlth

6. Kevin Crofton EPA

7. Matt Brooks LG

8. William Irwin EPA

9. Amechi Chukudebe BASF

10. Larry Sheets Bayer

11. Nasser Assaf Valent

12. Jim Bruckner Univ. GA

13. Anna Lowit EPA/HED

14. Tom Osmitz Science Strategies

15. Dana Friedman OPP/PRD

16. Tim Shafer EPA

17. Mike Hughes EPA
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CHARLOTTE AHEART, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. SODEXHO MARRIOTT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, No. 99-1033 and MARRIOTT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INCORPORATED; MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-97-3685-PJM) Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: February 22, 2000 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Eric Steele, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Todd J. Horn, Robin B. Bowerfind, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Charlotte D. Aheart appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc., on her claim for sexual harassment under Title VII and denying her motion to amend her complaint. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Aheart, see Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986), we find that the district court properly foundthat Marriott proved both elements of its affirmative defense to vicarious liability established by Faragher v. City of Boca Raton , 524 U.S. 775 (1998), and Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellereth , 524 U.S. 742 (1998). Aheart also appeals from the denial of her motion to amend her complaint to add a claim under the Montgomery County Human Relations Act. In light of the dismissal of Aheart's federal claim, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of her motion to amend. See Foman v. Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). Therefore, we affirm the order awarding summary judgment to Marriott and denying Aheart's motion to amend her complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentionsare adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2