70566 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 227 / Friday, November 24, 2000 / Notices

forwarded to the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB) for review and

approval: Standards of Performance for

Stationary Gas Turbines, (Subpart GG),

OMB No. 2060–0028, expiration date

January 31, 2001. The ICR describes the

nature of the information collection and

its expected burden and cost; where

appropriate, it includes the actual data

collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before December 26, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send comments, referencing

EPA ICR No. 1071.07 and OMB Control

No. 2060–0028 to the following address:

Sandy Farmer, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Collection Strategies

Division (Mail Code 2822), 1200

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20460; and to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA,

725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC

20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

a copy of the ICR contact Sandy Farmer

at EPA by phone at (202) 260–2740, by

E-Mail at

Farmer.Sandy@epamail.epa.gov or

download off the Internet at http://

www.epa.gov/icr and refer to EPA ICR

No. 1071.07. For technical questions

about the ICR contact Chris Oh at (202)

564–7004.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title:

Standards of Performance for Stationary

Gas Turbines (Subpart GG), (OMB

Control No. 2060–0028; EPA ICR No.

1071.07) expires January 31, 2001. This

is a request for an extension of a

currently approved collection.

Abstract: Owners and operators of

stationary gas turbines subject to the

NSPS for subpart GG must submit a onetime-only notification of construction/

reconstruction, anticipated and actual

startup date, initial performance test

date, physical or operational changes,

and demonstration of a continuous

monitoring system. They also must

provide a report on initial performance

test results, monitoring results and

excess emissions. Records must be

maintained of startups, shutdowns,

malfunctions, periods when the

continuous monitoring system is

inoperative, sulfur and nitrogen content

of the fuel, fuel to water ratio, rate of

fuel consumption, and ambient

conditions.

The required notifications are used to

inform the Agency or delegated

authority when a source becomes

subject to the standard. Performance test

reports are needed as these are the

Agency’s records of a source’s initial

capability to comply with the emission

standard and serve as a record of the

operating conditions under which

compliance was achieved. The

monitoring and excess emissions reports

are used for problem identification, as a

check on source operation and

maintenance, and for compliance

determination. The information

collected from recordkeeping and

reporting requirements is used for

targeting inspections and other uses in

the compliance and enforcement

program.

Responses to these information

collections are mandatory, per section

114(a) of the Clean Air Act. The

required information consists of

emissions data and other information

that has been determined not to be

confidential. However, any information

submitted to the Agency for which a

claim of confidentiality is made will be

safeguarded according to the Agency

policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1,

part 2, subpart B—Confidentiality of

Business Information (see 40 CFR part 2;

41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976;

amended by 43 FR 4000, September 8,

1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978;

44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

An agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for collection of

information unless it displays a

currently valid OMB control number.

The OMB control numbers for EPA’s

regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9

and 48 CFR Chapter 15. The Federal

Register document required under 5

CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on

this collection of information, was

published on 08/17/00 (65 FR 50196);

no comments were received.

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 56 hours per

response. Burden means the total time,

effort, or financial resources expended

by persons to generate, maintain, retain,

or disclose or provide information to or

for a Federal agency. This includes the

time needed to review instructions;

develop, acquire, install, and utilize

technology and systems for the purposes

of collecting, validating, and verifying

information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing

and providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements; train personnel to be able

to respond to a collection of

information; search data sources;

complete and review the collection of

information; and transmit or otherwise

disclose the information.

Respondents/Affected Entities:

Owners/Operators of stationary gas

turbines.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

775.

Frequency of Response: Semiannual.

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:

93,439.

Estimated Total Annualized Capital,

O&M Cost Burden: $0.

Send comments on the Agency’s need

for this information, the accuracy of the

provided burden estimates, and any

suggested methods for minimizing

respondent burden, including through

the use of automated collection

techniques to the following addresses.

Please refer to EPA ICR No. 1071.07 and

OMB Control No. 2060–0028 in any

correspondence.

Dated: November 16, 2000.

Oscar Morales,

Director, Collection Strategies Division.

[FR Doc. 00–30011 Filed 11–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6613–1]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared November 06, 2000 Through

November 10, 2000 pursuant to the

Environmental Review Process (ERP),

under section 309 of the Clean Air Act

and section 102(2)(c) of the National

Environmental Policy Act as amended.

Requests for copies of EPA comments

can be directed to the Office of Federal

Activities at (202) 564–7167. An

explanation of the ratings assigned to

draft environmental impact statements

(EISs) was published in Federal

Register dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR

20157).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–BOR–G39033–NM

Rating EC2, Rio Grande and Low Flow

Conveyance Channel Modifications

Channel System, From Rio Grande

Valley between San Acacia Diversion

Dam, NM and the Narrows of Elephant

Butte Reservoir, NM.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

preferred alternative identification, soils

information, ground water depths, and

habitat suitability. EPA requested that

the final document provide additional

information on these issues.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 227 / Friday, November 24, 2000 / Notices 70567

ERP No. DS–BLM–K67011–NV

Rating EC2, Betze-Post Project,

Updated Information, Dewatering

Operations and a Proposed Pipeline,

Elko and Eureka Counties, NV.

Summary: EPA expressed concerns

regarding the project’s direct and

cumulative impacts to biological

resources and recommended

consideration of an alternative to

mitigate impacts to springs and streams.

EPA also requested additional

information regarding ecological risk,

cumulative impacts and mitigation

measures.

ERP No. DS–COE–E36074–00

Rating EU3, Yazoo Basin

Reformulation Study, Supplement No: 1

To the 1982 Yazoo Area Pump Project,

Flood Control, Mississippi River and

Tributaries, Yazoo Basin, MS and LA.

Summary: EPA raised significant

objections with the recommended

pumping plan based on the potential for

large-scale adverse impacts to wetlands

and non-compliance with Section 404 of

the Clean Water Act. EPA also raised

objections over the lack of adequate

assessment of the scope/significance of

environmental impacts, and the flawed

procedures/incorrect assumptions used

throughout the document.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–J65302–UT

South Manti Timber Salvage, To

address Ecological and Economic

Values affected by Spruce Beetle

Activity in the South Manti Project,

Manti-La National Forest, Ferron-Price

and Sanpete Ranger Districts, Sanpete

and Sevier Counties, UT.

Summary: No formal comment letter

was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–AFS–L65300–ID

Goose Creek Watershed Project,

Harvesting Timber and Improve

Watershed, Payette National Forest,

New Meadows Ranger District, Adams

County, ID.

Summary: EPA continues to have

concerns about potential impacts from

road activities and harvesting to 303(d)

listed Brundage Reservoir and Little

Salmon River. EPA recommend that the

Forest Service complete analyses

prescribed in the May 1999 ‘‘Forest

Service and Bureau of Land

Management Protocol for Addressing

303(d) ‘‘Listed Waters’’ for the two

impaired waters and make this

information available to the

decisionmaker.

ERP No. F–COE–K36051–AZ

Rio de Flag Flood Control Study,

Improvement Flood Protection, City of

Flagstaff, Coconino County, AZ.

Summary: Nor formal comment letter

was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–COE–K36131–CA

Lower Mission Creek Flood Control

Project, Proposed Plan for Flood

Control, City of Santa Barbara, Santa

Barbara County, CA.

Summary: No formal comment letter

was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–COE–L39056–WA

Programmatic EIS—Green/Duwamish

River Basin Restoration Program,

Capitol Improvement Type Program and

Ecological Health, King County, WA.

Summary: No formal comment letter

was sent to the preparing agency.

Dated: November 21, 2000.

Joseph C. Montgomery,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00–30042 Filed 11–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6612–9]

Environmental Impact Statements;

Notice of Availability

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal

Activities, General Information (202)

564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/oeca/

ofa. Weekly receipt of Environmental

Impact Statements Filed November 13,

2000 Through November 17, 2000

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 000391, DRAFT EIS, FTA,

MN, Northstar Transportation Corridor

Project, Improvements from downtown

Minneapolis to the St. Cloud area along

Trunk Highway (TH) 10/47 and the

Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)

Railroad Transcontinental Route,

Connecting the Hiawatha Light Rail

Transit (LRT) Line at a Multi-Modal

Station, Minneapolis/St. Paul (MSP)

International, Due: January 08, 2001,

Contact: Paul Fish (312) 353–2865.

EIS No. 000392, DRAFT EIS, AFS,

OR, South Bend Weigh and Safety

Station Establishment, Special Use

Permit for Construction, Maintenance

and Operation, Deschute National

Forest Lands along US 97 near the

Newberry National Volcanic Monument,

Deschutes County, OR, Due: January 08,

2001, Contact: Chris Mickle (541) 383–

4769.

EIS No. 000393, DRAFT EIS, BLM,

OR, Rogue National Wild and Scenic

River Hellgate Recreation Area

(Applegate River to Grave Creek)

Management Plan, Implementation,

Badford District, Ephine County, OR,

Due: February 24, 2001, Contact: Cori

Cooper (541) 618–2428.

EIS No. 000394, FINAL

SUPPLEMENT, NPS, CA, Yosemite

National Park General Management

Plan, Implementation, Tuolumne

County, CA, Due: December 26, 2000,

Contact: Alan Schmierer (415) 427–

1441.

EIS No. 000395, FINAL EIS, AFS, MT,

ID, Yellowstone Pipeline Proposed

Changes to Existing Pipeline between

Thompson Fall and Kingston, Sanders

County, MT and Shoshone County, ID,

Due: December 26, 2000, Contact: Terry

Egenhoff (406) 329–3601.

EIS No. 000396, DRAFT EIS, AFS,

OR, Mill Creek Timber Sales and

Related Activities, To Implement

Ecosystem Management Activities,

Prospect Ranger District, Rogue River

National Forest, Jackson County, OR,

Due: January 16, 2001, Contact: Joel T.

King (541) 560–3400.

EIS No. 000397, DRAFT

SUPPLEMENT, COE, IL, Sugar Creek

Municipal Water Supply, Updated

Information, Proposed New 1172 Acre

Water Supply Reservoir, Construction,

COE Section 404 Permit Issuance, City

of Marion, Williamson and Johnson

Counties, IL, Due: January 08, 2001,

Contact: Ronny Sadri (502) 315–6681.

EIS No. 000398, DRAFT EIS, AFS, ID,

UT, OR, Boise National Forest, Payette

National Forest and Sawtooth National

Forest, Forest Plan Revision,

Implementation, Southwest Idaho

Ecogroup several counties, ID, Malhaur

County, OR and Box Elder County, UT,

Due: March 15, 2001, Contact: David

Rittenhouse (208) 373–4100.

EIS No. 000399, DRAFT EIS, FAA, IL,

WI, IN, Chicago Terminal Airspace

Project (CTAP), For Proposed Air Traffic

Control Procedures and Airspace

Modification for Aircraft Operating To/

From the Chicago Region, Including

Chicago O’Hare International Airport,

Chicago Midway Airport, Milwaukee

Mitchell International Airport, IL, IN

and WI, Due: January 08, 2001, Contact:

Annette Davis (847) 294–8091.

EIS No. 000400, DRAFT

SUPPLEMENT, NOA, ME, VT, CT, NH,

MA, RI, Federal Lobster Management in

the Exclusive Economic Service,

Implementation, American Lobster

Fishery Management Plan, NY, NH and

MA, Due: January 08, 2001, Contact:

Penelope D. Dalton (301) 713–2239.

EIS No. 000401, DRAFT EIS, DOE, SC,

Savannah River Site, High-Level Waste