alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACTIO N 

m 

CONTROL NO. 

^^flJI^ ^ S10-10($304-058 

• • ^ fca ^ H SACRAMENTO ASIAN SPORTS FOUNDATION 

February 25, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood ;:^ 

Secretary - United States Department of Transportation :J 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. • 

Washington, D.C. 20590 ;^ 

Dear Secretary LaHood: ;2J 

My civic organization is writing this letter in response to the Department of Traaisportatton's 

(DOT) proceeding (Docket 2010-0018) to ask that DOT allocate to San Francisco one of the four (4) new 

opportunities for air 5Ci~vice between the United States and Tokyo's Haneda International Airport. 

The San Francisco Bay Area is not only home to the nation's oldest and most vibrant JapaneseAmerican community, but has long been, and remains, a key focus of economic activity between the U.S. 

and Japan. Our organization, though located in the Sacramento Valley has strong ties with our Sister City 

in Matsuyama, Japan and having the Haneda connection would allow our visitors and government 

officials easier access to not only San Francisco but to the Sacramento Valley region. 

Together with the Sacramento and San Joaquin regions, San Francisco has the second largest 

concentration of Japanese Americans. If you include the entire state, California's Japanese population far 

exceeds that of all the rest of the nation, and is nearly ten times that of New York and 15 times that of 

Illinois. 

Of particular importance in this Haneda proceeding is the fact that business travel represents a 

disproportionate share of San Francisco-Japan travel. Nonstop San Francisco service to Haneda would 

directly serve this key business demand, and provide an important, economic enhancement for the state 

and our region. 

As Asia's busiest airport, with connections throughout Japan, Haneda offers a major service 

improvement for U.S. travelers, particularly time-sensitive business travelers. Haneda service could cut an 

hour or more from today's time-consuming and costly journey between dovratown Tokyo and Narita, and 

the overall journey from the U.S. to Tokyo. 

The public interest in maximizing the benefits of the newly-negotiated U.S. carrier access to 

Haneda clearly favors allocating a Haneda service opportunity to United Airlines — that seeks to serve the 

Bay Area and Northern California. 

I congratulate your Department on negotiating U.S. access to this important Asian hub and urge 

you to act expeditiously to make possible nonstop service between San Francisco and Haneda possible. 

Re^ectfully submitted, 

Karen Fong Cotton 

PO Box 221838 Sacramento, CA 95822 P 9 I 6.684.6533 F 9 I 6.684.6482 www.sasfquest.org
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by andamong CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK,N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, asTrustee , and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Custodian with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 44 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 86
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 44 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 87
Case 5:22-cr-00099-H-BQ Document 14 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 36
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Cygnus, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C Hodgman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  /s/ John C HodgmanJohn C HodgmanChief Executive OfficerMarch 26, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cygnus, Inc. and will
be retained by Cygnus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
A01A0303.

#### COOPER v. THE STATE.

(549 SE2d 829)

Ellington, Judge.

A Fulton County jury convicted Kenneth Cooper of three violations of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-30 et seq. Cooper filed a motion for new trial, as well as two amendments to the motion. As amended, the motion raised 14 alleged errors, including the trial court’s denial of various evidentiary motions, a motion for severance, and a motion for a directed verdict. The trial court scheduled a motion hearing for 9:30 a.m. on June 13, 2000. At 9:30 a.m. on the day of the hearing, trial counsel called the court and stated that he was running late and would be in court within ten minutes. After ten minutes, the trial court stated that it had reviewed the motion for new trial and the transcript, determined that the motion lacked merit, and denied the motion without conducting a hearing. The trial court’s order denying the motion addressed only the sufficiency of the evidence to support one of the charges. Cooper appeals from the trial court’s order, raising nine enumerations of error, including the trial court’s failure to conduct a hearing on his motion for new trial.

Although a party has a right to a hearing on his motion for new trial, this Court previously has held that a party desiring a hearing must affirmatively request one. OCGA § 5-5-40 (e); *Shockley v. State,*
      *882230 Ga. 869 (199 SE2d 791) (1973); *Wilkins v. State,*220 Ga. App. 516, 518 (3) (469 SE2d 695) (1996). Pretermitting whether Cooper’s motion could be construed as a request for a motion hearing, however, the record clearly demonstrates that a hearing was, in fact, scheduled. Cooper was entitled to rely on this fact and was relieved of any additional need to formally request a motion hearing. Further, there was no evidence in the record to indicate Cooper waived or abandoned his right to a motion hearing.* Cf. *Wilkins v. State,*220 Ga. App. at 518 (3). Under these circumstances, the trial court’s failure to conduct a hearing on Cooper’s motion for new trial was error. We vacate the trial court’s order and remand this case for a hearing on the merits of Cooper’s motion for new trial.

Decided June 6, 2001.

*Lagrant Anthony, Charles H. Frier,*for appellant.

*Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Advera A. Wheeler, Bettieanne C. Hart, Myrlin Earle, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

*Judgment vacated and case remanded.*

*Johnson, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.*

In its responsive brief to this Court, the State concedes that Cooper is entitled to a hearing on his motion for new trial.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>   0000943320
<NAME>  TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         106,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,241
<INVENTORY>                                     13,078
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,652
<PP&E>                                       2,306,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                 465,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,231,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,176
<BONDS>                                      1,740,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           242
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,231,898
<SALES>                                        656,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               727,947
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  414,148<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               179,009<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,947
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,634)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  8,288
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,346)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)
<FN>
<F1>Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other
<F2>Includes general & administration, depreciation & amortization, and Trump
World's Fair closing costs.
</FN>



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1252 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1252

 To repeal title X of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
                              Act of 1974.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1993

 Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
          to the Committees on Government Operations and Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal title X of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
                              Act of 1974.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEALER.

    (a) Repealer.--Title X of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 
Control Act of 1974 is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--(1) Section 1(a) of the Congressional 
Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 relating to title X is 
amended by striking ``and title X may be cited as the `Impoundment 
Control Act of 1974'''.
    (2) That portion of the table of contents set forth in section 1(b) 
of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 
relating to title X is repealed.
    (3) Paragraph (3) of section 2 of the Congressional Budget and 
Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is repealed and paragraphs (4) and (5) 
of that section are redesignated as paragraphs (3) and (4), 
respectively.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                            DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
                        4925 GREENVILLE AVENUE, SUITE 400
                                ONE ENERGY SQUARE
                               DALLAS, TEXAS 75206


                                 March 24, 2004


NEG Operating LLC
1400 One Energy Square
4925 Greenville Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75206

Ladies and Gentlemen:


         We hereby consent to the incorporation of the references to DeGolyer
and MacNaughton and to the use by reference of information contained in our
"Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2003 on Certain Properties owned by NEG
Operating LLC" (our Report) in the "Supplementary Crude Oil and Natural Gas
Reserves Information (Unaudited)" section of the NEG Operating LLC Annual Report
on Form 10-K (the Annual Report). However, since the estimates of crude oil and
natural gas reserves set forth in our Report have been combined with reserves
estimates of other petroleum consultants, we are necessarily unable to verify
the accuracy of the reserves estimates contained in the aforementioned Annual
Report.

                                            Very truly yours,


                                             /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton
                                             ----------------------------
                                             DeGolyer and MacNaughton
The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

The Honorable Penny Pritzker 

US Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20230 

1 MetroTech Center North 

Brooklyn, NY 11207 

Phone: 718-222-3796 

Fax: 718-246-3718 

April17, 2015 

Dear Secretary Foxx, Secretary Kerry and Secretary Pritzker, 

The greater New York City area is home to three major airports making it a region that is flush 

with jobs and businesses that support the airport facilities, airport authorities and the millions 

of passengers that travel to and out of the New York metropolitan area. 

The three major domestic airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines, have 

generated approximately 31,000 jobs in the greater New York area. These airlines carry a 

combination of 53 million passengers annually out of Newark, JFK and LaGuardia airports. 

This adds up to a lot of jobs and a lot of travelers who rely on American carriers for reaching 

their destination. 

Upon learning that the U.S. airline industry is under siege because the Gulf carriers- Qatar 

Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline- are receiving extraordinary subsidies from the 

s 1 0-150428-023 
governments of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE} I was alarmed and you should be as 

well. 

Yes, this challenges the integrity of whether these countries have violated the Open Skies policy 

-a policy that ensures fair competition between global carriers. But more so, it goes to the 

heart of what their violation of the policy means to American workers and businesses, and that 

is jobs. American jobs are at stake. These are jobs with the airlines directly and with the 

businesses and port authorities that service the airport and its passengers. 

It goes without saying that when American businesses are forced to operate in an unfair 

competitive environment, we may see the negative results here at home. However, I am most 

concerned by the incalculable number of workers throughout the New York metro region who 

will be hurt by the unfair practices being undertaken by Qatar and the UAE. 

It is imperative that you address this issue immediately by opening consultations with Qatar 

and the UAE and restore the spirit of Open Skies agreements. Doing so will prevent the U.S. 

airlines and surrounding businesses from laying off workers and will give America the ability to 

compete effectively in a global economy. 

Sincerely, 

Bill Lipton, New York State Director 

Working Families Party 

Cc: 

Senator Charles Schumer 

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand 

Representative Steve Israel 

Representative Joseph Crow ley 

Representative Gregory Meeks 

Representative Grace Meng 

Representative Sean Patrick Maloney 

Representative Jerrold Nadler 

Representative Nita Lowey 

Representative Jose Serrano 

Representative Eliot Engel 

Governor Andrew Cuomo 

Mayor Bill de Blasio 

s 10-150428-023
## SERVE D JANUAR Y 5,201 0 ^^^ ^ ^'MMOmm

U.S
. DEPARTMEN

T O F TRANSPORTATIO

N OFFICE O F HEARINGS WASHINGTON , DC
I N TH E MATTE RO F 

### Webc o Aircraf

t Compan y FA A DOCKE

T No
. CP09CE000 1 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2009-083 9 

### ORDE RGRANTIN G RESPONDEN T MOTIO N Thi s matte r currently i s scheduledto b e hear dbeginnin g March 8 , 2010
. Responden

t Webc o Akcraf

t Compan y ("Respondent" ) o n Decembe r 14 , 2009 , file

da Motion t o Amendth e Procedura l Orde r an dReset th e Tria l Date ("Motion")
. It

ask s tha t th e hearin g b e reschedule dto adate a t leas t 9 0 day s afte

r ahearin g befor

e th e Nationa

l Transportatio n Safet

y Boar d("NTSB") , scheduledfo

r Februar y 11 , 2010 , which involve s arelate dmatte

r an dth e sam e counsel
. Discover

y in th e NTS B matte

r ma y b e used in th e instan

t case , Responden

t asserts , an

dtha t circumstanc e necessitate s postponemen

t o f th e discover

y deadline s set

b y th e Octobe

r 1,200 9 Procedura

l Orde r to March 1,2010 , an

dth e concomitan

t continuatio n o

f th e hearing
. Complainan

t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) ha s no t answere dth e Motion
. For goo dcaus e shown
. Respondent' s Motion i s hereb y GRANTED
. The discover y deadline s set

b y th e Procedura

l Orde r ar e hereb y extende dt o Marc

h 1 , 2010
. Additionally , th e hearin g i s hereb y continued ; i t wil l b e reschedule db y subsequen t order
.S O ORDERED
.

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t Richar d C
. Goodwi n U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docke t No
. CP09CE000 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Robert Weber , Presiden t Webc o Aircreif

t Company , Responden t 113 4 N.Olive r

Roa d Newton , K S 67114-944 6 Edwar d A
. McConwell , Respondent' s Counse l McConwel l La w Office s 592 5 Beveri y Mission , K S 6620 2 TEL : 913-262-060 5 FAX : 913-262-065 2 Davi dKessler , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Coimsel , ACE-7 , Centra l Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n DO T Building , 90 1 Locust , Roo m50 6 Kansa s City , M O 64106-264 1 TEL : 816-329-376 3 FAX : 816-329-377 1 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Advisor : 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistant : 202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite d courier , use th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
#### Ethel Allene HANNA, Appellant, v. The NATIONAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS. CO., Appellee.

No. 13547.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

Nov. 24, 1944.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1944.

DeShazo & Hyde and Frances M. Chaney, all of Dallas, for appellant.

Read, Lowrance & Bates, of Dallas, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The above styled companion case has been held in abeyance pending final determination of No. 13S46, Hanna v. Rio Grande National Life Insurance Company, 181 S.W.2d 908, and judgment in last numbered case has been approved by the Supreme Court in application for writ of error denied October 11, 1944.

It is our opinion that the principles and authorities applied in cause No. 13546 are equally decisive of this appeal and require a similar ruling. Judgment of the trial court is accordingly reversed and the instant cause is remanded for further trial.

BOND, G J., dissenting on grounds heretofore stated.
Take notice the Ecological Resources subgroup of the Mokelumne Relicensing Collaborative will meet on Thursday, February 10, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.; February 23-25, March 1-2, and March 22-23, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

                    Take notice the Recreation subgroup will meet on Monday, February 14, and March 21-23, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meetings of the Ecological Resources and Recreation subgroups will be held at the PG&E offices, 2740 Gateway Oaks Drive, in Sacramento, California. Expected participants need to give their names to David Moller (PG&E) at (415) 973-4696.                    Start Printed Page 6596

For further information, please contact Diana Shannon at (202) 208-7774.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-3044 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 60717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 10, 2004               /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       S. Leslie Flegel

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 10, 2004               /s/ Marc Fierman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Marc Fierman