alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



US ONCOLOGY, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, R. Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ R. Dale Ross                            
|R. Dale Ross                                
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology, Inc.



November 14, 2005



-44-
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-0245

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM135AD

747-21A2523, R1 --- 10/3/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

United States International Trade Commission. 

# TIME AND DATE: 

February 15, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. 

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436 Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# STATUS: 

Open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agenda for future meeting: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-302 and 731-TA-454 (Review)(Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway)—briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on February 24, 2000.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

By order of the Commission.

Issued: February 3, 2000. 

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-3022 Filed 2-4-00; 4:25 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

          - [Exemption  Application D-10608 and D-10609]

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     dated October 6, 1998 (63 FR 53720), the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and from certain taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of proposed exemption, for which retroactive relief had been requested, concerned three cash sales by the Plans of certain third party common stock to Millcraft Industries, Inc., (Millcraft), the sponsor of the Plans and a party in interest.                 

By letter dated November 3, 2000, Millcraft, its wholly owned subsidiary, Millcraft, Products, Inc., and the trustees of the Plans, informed the Department that they wished to withdraw the notice of proposed exemption. 

Accordingly the notice of proposed exemption is hereby withdrawn. 

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 20th day of November, 2000. 

Ivan L. Strasfeld, 

Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Department of Labor.

[FR Doc. 00-29972 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
**The Agenda**

**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting**

**Wednesday, November 13, 2013**

**U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs**

**810 Seventh Street, NW, 3rd Floor Conference Center, Washington, DC 20531**

****

**10:30-10:45 am 	Welcome, Opening Remarks, and Introductions**

*Tony West, Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)*

**

*Robert Listenbee, Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), DOJ, Vice Chair, Coordinating Council*

**10:45-12:15 pm	The Affordable Care Act (ACA):  Implications for Vulnerable Adolescents and Young Adults**

*****Wilma Robinson, Deputy Director, Office of Adolescent Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)*

*Abigail English, Director, Center for Adolescent Health and the Law*

*Barbara Edwards, Director, Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group, Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey & Certification, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, HHS.*

*Diane Justice, Senior Program Director, National Academy for State Health Policy*

**

*Council Member Discussion*

**12:15-12:25 pm	Agency and Practitioner Announcements**

****

**12:25-12:30 pm	Summary and Meeting Adjournment**

*Robert Listenbee, Administrator, OJJDP, Council Vice Chair*****

# image1.jpeg
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2055

LAWRENCE D. MORDEROSIAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES S. GILMORE, III,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-00-1163-A)

Submitted: January 15, 2002 Decided: January 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence D. Morderosian, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Ann Berkebile,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence D. Morderosian seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion for extension of time to appeal its dismissal of his civil action. The district court entered an order on

July 16, 2001 granting Morderosian thirty days in which to appeal

its April 30, 2001 order denying him an extension of time to

appeal. The court later emphasized in a July 31, 2001 order that

Morderosian had until August 15, 2001 to note his appeal. We

conclude the district court was without jurisdiction to so extend

the appeal period because more than sixty days had lapsed since the

April 30, 2001 order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(c). In any

event, Morderosian’s notice of appeal was not filed until August

17, 2001.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We deny Morderosian’s motion for oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,636
<PP&E>                                       7,174,936
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,767,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,532,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,360
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,532,021
<SALES>                                        347,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,821
<CGS>                                           87,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             87,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,870
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139875

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139875 COA: 293413 Oakland CC: 2008-223260-FH AMYDORTHY RENEEMARIE WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 28, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
From: Meehan, Clair

Subject: REMINDER - Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule - October 29 Public Meeting

Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:06:02 PM

Attachments: Logistics - WQS Reg Clarification Public Meeting 2013 10-17.pdf

WQS Reg Clarification Meeting - Agenda - FINAL.pdf

Supplemental-Information-Comparison-of-Existing-Rule-Language-and-Proposed-Rule-Language.pdf

REMINDER

Water Quality Standards Regulatory

Clarifications Proposed Rule: Public Meeting

Thank you for registering for the public meeting on EPA’s Water Quality Standards

Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule. The meeting will be held October 29, 2013,

10:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. (Eastern) at the Smithsonian National Zoological Park’s Visitor

Center Auditorium, 3001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.

Attached, please find several items:

· The draft agenda for next week’s event

· A printable logistics sheet with directions to the meeting.

· A redline strikeout comparison of the existing regulatory language and proposed

rulemaking

Additional information about the proposed rulemaking is available on EPA’s website:

http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/wqs_index.cfm.

OTHER NOTES:

· On the day of the event, check-in will begin at 9:00 a.m.

· Please bring a writing utensil, as participants will be able to provide clarifying

questions to EPA in writing.

Clair Meehan | Environmental Scientist

clair.meehan@tetratech.com

Tetra Tech | Complex World, Clear Solutions

www.tetratech.com

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information.

Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from

your system.
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
First Amendment to Agreement of Lease



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF LEASE 
  
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF LEASE (this “First Amendment”) is made as of the 21st day of April,
2005, by and between Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (“Lessor”) and Stephen A. Wynn (“Lessee” and, together with Lessor, the “Parties”). 
  
 RECITALS: 
  
 A. The Parties have entered into an Agreement of Lease dated as of January 10, 2005 (the “Lease”), under which Lessee is to lease a
luxury suite (the “Suite”) in Lessor’s Wynn Las Vegas luxury casino and resort hotel (the “Resort”). By its terms, the Lease is to commence on the earlier of the date Lessee occupies the Suite or the date the
Resort opens to the public. 
  
 B. Because of the time and effort
being expended in connection with the opening of the Resort, Lessee is not prepared and will not be able to move out of his current residence and into the Suite until on or about July 1, 2005. The Parties therefore mutually desire to postpone the
commencement date of the Lease to the earlier of the date Lessee occupies the Suite or July 1, 2005. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 
  
 1. Section 2 of the Lease is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “2. Term. The initial term of this Lease shall be for the twelve month period commencing on the earlier of the
date Lessee occupies the suite or July 1, 2005, and continuing for consecutive twelve month periods thereafter from year to year unless terminated by (i) either party giving notice of that party’s intent to terminate, in a signed writing to the
other party at the address set forth after its or his name in the preamble to this Lease, at least 90 days prior to the last day of the initial term or renewal term, as applicable, or (ii) Lessee’s death.” 
  
 2. Except as modified by this First Amendment, all of the terms and
conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as of the day and year first written above. This First Amendment is subject to and shall become effective only upon approval by the Audit Committee of Wynn Resorts, Limited.

  

									
	 WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC,
 a Nevada limited liability company,
	 	 	 	 
					
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Marc D. Schorr
	 	 	 	 	 	 /s/ Stephen A. Wynn

	 Name:
	 	 Marc. D. Schorr
	 	 	 	 	 	 STEPHEN A. WYNN

	 Title:
	 	 President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,867,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,902,331
<PP&E>                                          53,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,925,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,746
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,740,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,925,850
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               550,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               486,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            115,856
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:22-cr-00101-Z-BR Document 35 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 82
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.



--------------------------------------------------------------------





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Andean Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended March 31, 2004,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Lance Larsen, President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2004



/s/ Lance Larsen _____________

Lance Larsen, CEO
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1122

To require the consolidation of agricultural research and extension activities

of the Department of Agriculture.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. DOOLITTLE,

and Mr. ZIMMER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To require the consolidation of agricultural research and

extension activities of the Department of Agriculture.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSOLIDATION OF FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL

4 RESEARCH AND EXTENSION AGENCIES.

5 (a) CONSOLIDATION REQUIRED.—Not later than

6 September 30, 1993, the Secretary of Agriculture shall

7 consolidate the functions and activities of the following

8 agencies of the Department of Agriculture:

9 (1) The Agricultural Research Service.

10 (2) The Cooperative State Research Service.
2

•HR 1122 IH

1 (3) The Federal Extension Service.

2 (b) SINGLE RESEARCH AND EXTENSION SERVICE.—

3 As part of the consolidation of the agencies specified in

4 subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture shall establish

5 in the Department of Agriculture a unified Agriculture

6 Research and Extension Service to administer all pro7 grams of the Department of Agriculture related to agricul8 tural research and extension in order to ensure more effec9 tive, efficient, and economical administration of those pro10 grams and activities and to eliminate duplication.

11 (c) EFFECT OF CONSOLIDATION.—Upon consolida12 tion of an agency referred to in subsection (a), all pro13 grams and activities previously administered by that agen14 cy shall be administered by the Agriculture Research and

15 Extension Service established under subsection (b). The

16 assets, contracts, property, records, and employees of that

17 agency, and the unexpended balances of any appropria18 tions available to that agency, relating to those programs

19 and activities shall be transferred to the Agriculture Re20 search and Extension Service. Any reference to that agen21 cy in any law, regulation, or order shall be considered to

22 be a reference to the Agriculture Research and Extension

23 Service.

24 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

25 are authorized to be appropriated to the Agriculture Re-
3

•HR 1122 IH

1 search and Extension Service established under subsection

2 (b) $800,000,000 for fiscal year 1994. Notwithstanding

3 any authorization of appropriations or permanent appro4 priations for an agency specified in subsection (a), the

5 total amount available to the Agriculture Research and

6 Extension Service for a fiscal year may not exceed the

7 amount appropriated pursuant to this subsection.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board; Notice of advisory committee meeting

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DB) Task Force on Systems 
Technology for the Future U.S. Strategic Posture will meet in closed 
session on December 14-15, 2000; January 10-11, 2001; February 14-15, 
2001; March 14-15, 2001; April 11-12, 2001; May 16-17, 2001; and June 
13-14, 2001. All meetings will be held at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 
Wilson Boulevard, 6th Floor, Arlington, VA 22202. This Task Force will 
review the likely nature and evolution of potential future strategic 
challenges to the U.S., advanced technologies for nuclear weapons 
systems and non-nuclear strategic weapons systems, and advanced C4ISR 
technology applications for strategic contingencies.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will consider the extent 
to which technologies and systems currently being developed and applied 
for regional contingencies are relevant and applicable to future 
strategic contingencies; take into account affordability and arms 
control constraints; look at possible further future ballistic missile 
defense technology to the extent that ballistic missile defense relates 
to the overall future strategic posture; and consider strategies for 
using the national strategic technology base to deal with, or hedge 
against, the uncertainties and ambiguities inherent in the nature and 
timing of emergence of possible strategic threats, including possible 
dissuasion of such threats; and, consider the capability of the 
technology and industrial base to respond in time to long-term 
strategic warning in various forms, including the adequacy and 
responsiveness of DoD's science and technology programs.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1994), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: November 16, 2000.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-29933 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M