alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.



--------------------------------------------------------------------





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Andean Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended June 30, 2004,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Lance Larsen,  Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 16, 2004

/s/ Lance Larsen____________________________

Lance Larsen,

Chief Accounting Officer
2010 National Detention Analysis by Gender

Technical Violations & Status Offenses

Data Source: Sickmund, M., Sladky, T.J., Kang, W., & Puzzanchera, C. (2011). "Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement." Available: http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/

1. %  of all detained youth

2. % of youth detained for Technical Violation or Status Offense Within Gender

Domestic Battery, Washoe County, NV, 2006-2010

Data Source: Washoe County Department of Juvenile Services 

Arrest & Detentions of Females
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70732-70733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-200-1430-EQ]


Notice of Realty Action--Lake County

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action, Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
Section 302 Lease, in Lake County, Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: All public land within the City of Leadville, Colorado is 
available for lease under Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 as amended, and the regulations thereunder 43 
CFR part 2920 for authorization of historic commercial or residential 
use. Owners of qualified improvements may make application and after 
analysis they may be offered a 20-year lease to allow continued

[[Page 70733]]

Public land use. They will be required to pay an annual rental based on 
a fair market appraisal.

DATES: Interested parties may comment on this action on or before Jan. 
5, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Field Office Manager, Bureau of Land Management, 3170 East 
Main St., Canon City, CO 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Hallock, BLM Realty Specialist, 
at the above address, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9afefbecffc5c5f2fbf6f6f5f9f1dad9d5b4d8d6d7b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</a>, or phone: (719) 
269-8536.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Typical qualified parcels are isolated 
remnants of Public land resulting from the patenting of mining claims 
(private land) that entirely surround the parcel. Additionally, the 
parcel is now overlapped by city lots and the parcel was developed 
prior to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and has 
been historically and unintentionally used for either commercial or 
residential purposes.

Levi D. Deike,
Field Office Manager, Royal Gorge Field Office.
[FR Doc. 00-30129 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  Apology The page for the FY14 Academic Calendar is being revised. Please check back at a later time for updates.
 Academic Calendar: Today
 Categories: select Select All
 Holidays
 View: Select...
 FebruaryMarch 2024AprilSunMonTueWedThuFriSat252627282912345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031123456
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    JFSCFooterRight
    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

COLIN NATHANSON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-56410

D.C. Nos. 8:12-cv-01978-CJC

8:05-cr-00301-CJC-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 7, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, BEA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Colin Nathanson appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his 324-month sentence for mail fraud. We 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(d), and we affirm.

Nathanson has not shown “that counsel’s representation fell below an 

objective standard of reasonableness.” See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 

 

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

FILED

OCTOBER 30 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

668, 687-88 (1984). Appellate counsel are not required to raise every nonfrivolous 

claim in a merits brief, and “‘[g]enerally, only when ignored issues are clearly 

stronger than those presented, will the presumption of effective assistance of counsel 

be overcome.’” Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 288 (2000) (quoting Gray v. 

Greer, 800 F.2d 644, 646 (7th Cir. 1986)). It was not clear that a due process claim 

based on Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 (1983), would have been stronger than 

the claims Nathanson’s counsel actually raised. 

AFFIRMED.
TS – 11KK4D, Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, ECOSARTM Estimates

Redacted
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2022

No. 04-22-00716-CR

EX PARTE George TROTTI,

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR7385-W2

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On November 4, 2022, this court ordered Appellant to show cause regarding this court’s 

jurisdiction to review his habeas appeal, which stemmed from a felony case. Appellant did not 

respond. Nevertheless, on this court’s further review, the record showed that this court has 

jurisdiction over the appeal since Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to only one misdemeanor 

offense pursuant to a plea agreement with the State. See Dahesh v. State, 51 S.W.3d 300, 302 

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. ref’d) (citing Ex parte Jordan, 659 S.W.2d 827, 828 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1983)).

However, the clerk’s record does not contain the trial court’s certification regarding 

Appellant’s right to appeal. Contra TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); Ex parte Tarango, 116 S.W.3d 

201, 203 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, no pet.) (determining that certification requirement applies 

to orders “denying habeas corpus relief”).

We ORDER the trial court to complete and provide to the Bexar County District Clerk a 

certification regarding the defendant’s right to appeal within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this 

order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2); accord Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 806 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2013) (“Under subsection (c)(2), the appellate court may order the trial court to prepare and 

file the certification of the defendant’s right of appeal, and the trial-court clerk must prepare and 

file in the appellate court a supplemental record containing the certification.”). 

The supplemental clerk’s record must be filed in this court within THIRTY DAYS of the 

date of this order.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 67

To designate the visitors center at the Channel Islands National Park, 
     California, as the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitors Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

   Mr. Gallegly (for himself, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Wolf, Ms. 
Norton, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Bereuter, Mrs. Morella, Mr. McDade, Mr. Dornan, 
   Mr. Packard, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Cox, Mr. 
  Hefley, Mr. Thomas of California, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Young of 
Alaska, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Beilenson, Mr. Dreier, 
 Mr. Herger, Mr. Berman, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. 
Vucanovich, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Mineta, Mr. 
 Moorhead, Mr. Royce, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. 
 Bacchus of Florida, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Kim, Mr. 
 McCandless, Mr. Baker of California, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Michel, Mr. 
 Horn, and Mr. Hyde) introduced the following joint resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To designate the visitors center at the Channel Islands National Park, 
     California, as the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitors Center''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The visitors center at the Channel Islands National Park, 
California, is designated as the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitors 
Center''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the visitors center referred to in 
section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. Lagomarsino 
Visitors Center''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     152,271
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              126,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                                22,734
<INVENTORY>                                                 74,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           515,141
<PP&E>                                                   1,373,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                             978,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           2,038,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    3,247,674
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                              2,875,000
<COMMON>                                                16,910,544
<OTHER-SE>                                             (21,439,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2,038,406
<SALES>                                                  1,110,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,110,305
<CGS>                                                       49,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            3,028,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         264,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (2,087,122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (2,087,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (2,087,122)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.43)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-QSB of Andean Development Company
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pedro Pablo
Errazuriz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2002
                                           /s/ Pedro Pablo Errazuriz
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Pedro Pablo Errazuriz,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Agenda – May 2011 Refunding

Treasury Dealer Meetings Friday, April 29, 2011

Dealer ___________________

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, April 25, 

2011 to Debt.Management@treasury.gov and Mark.Cabana@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled 

to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates

Central

Estimate

Range that would not 

surprise you

Low/High

April – June 2011 /

 Ending Cash Balance /

July – September 2011 /

 Ending Cash Balance /

FY 2011 Total Marketable Borrowing /

FY 2012 Total Marketable Borrowing /

II. Budget Deficit Estimates

FY 2011 /

FY 2012 /

FY 2013 /

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates

3-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / /

10-year note (May) /

10-year note reopening (June/July) / / - /

30-year bond (May) /

30-year bond reopening (June/July) /

2-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / /

5-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / /

7-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / /

10-year TIPS reopening (May)

30-year TIPS reopening (June)

10-year TIPS (July)

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill size (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

Total change in bills outstanding May ‘11 – July ‘11 /

Total change in bills outstanding FY 2011 /

CMB issuance May ‘11 – July ‘11 (size/date) / / / /

Please provide your estimates in the format provided above with central estimates followed by low/high 

estimates for each.

Discussion Topics

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2011 and FY2012. Do you believe the 

current financing schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s financing needs though the end of FY2012? 

Please elaborate. 

2. Please comment on the recent developments in the money markets, with an emphasis on short-term 

financing conditions. 

3. Please comment on the liquidity conditions in the Treasury STRIPS market. Can Treasury make any 

modifications to the STRIPS program in a way that will further enhance STRIPS liquidity?
#### HANKINS v. STATE.

No. 22994.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1944.

W. T. Link, of Clarendon, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $100 for the offense of 'selling liquor in a dry area.

The proof was sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. Two bills of exception complain of the introduction of evidence. An agent of the Liquor Control Board testified, fixing the time and place of the purchase of liquor from appellant as February 21st, 1944, at the Davis Bumper to Bumper filling station. Appellant denied being at such place on said date and in rebuttal offered corroborating evidence on this issue. He testified that the time he was seen there by the Sheriff and a Deputy was another and different date. In an effort to answer this testimony by appellant the State recalled the prosecuting witness who testified that on the night of February 21st, 1944, he told the Sheriff that he bought the whiskey “from the defendant, Curtis Hankins, that night.” ‘By the second bill objection is raised to the evidence of the Sheriff regarding the same transaction in which the Sheriff testified that the prosecuting witness told him that he “had just bought it (the whiskey) from the defendant, Curtis Hankins.” In each case the bill says that the evidence was objected to in advance of the answer and that the court was requested to withdraw it from the jury after it was made but that his objections were overruled. The court qualifies the bill in each case with a positive contradictory statement. However, appellant objected and excepted to such qualification in each of the bills. The court did not follow this by writing his own bills and they are before us as though no qualifications had been made. Winfrey v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 670, 65 S.W.2d 297.

It will not be necessary to discuss the merit of these bills. Clearly what the witness told the Sheriff about having purchased the liquor from the accused that night, and what the Sheriff testified, detailing the statement made by prosecuting witness on that particular night, was in each case hearsay. The testimony is damaging and the error in admitting it requires that this case be reversed and remanded for a new trial and it is accordingly so ordered.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfredo Buelvas, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered January 25, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
______________________________________________________________________________________

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KENNETH MAGGIO & DARCY 

MAGGIO,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

LIBERTY INSURANCE 

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-01535

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff 

Kenneth Maggio and Darcy Maggio and Defendant Liberty Insurance Corporation 

(collectively, the “Parties”) file this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, and 

would show the Court as follows:

All matters between the Parties have been fully settled. Accordingly, the Parties 

now request that this matter, including all claims that have been and/or could have been 

asserted in this matter, be dismissed with prejudice to the re-filing of same.

Case 3:22-cv-01535-E Document 4 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 92
______________________________________________________________________________________

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Racchel D. Cabrera

Shaun Hodge

Texas Bar No. 24052995

Racchel Cabrera 

Texas Bar No. 24109093

HODGE LAW FIRM PLLC

2028 E. Ben White Blvd. Ste. 240-2015

Hodge Law Firm PLLC

The Heritage Runge House 

1301 Market Street

Galveston, Texas 77550

Telephone: 409.762.5000

Facsimile 409.763.2300

Email: shodge@hodgefirm.com

rcabrera@hodgefirrn.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

KENNETH MAGGIO & DARCY MAGGIO

/s/ Colin Batchelor

COLIN BATCHELOR

State Bar No. 24043545

SALINA A. KABANI

State Bar No. 27067474

TILLMAN BATCHELOR LLP

5605 N. MacArthur Blvd., Suite 560

Irving, Texas 75038

Telephone: (214) 492-5720

Facsimile: (214) 492-5721

E-mail: mark.tillman@tb-llp.com

E-mail: colin.batchelor@tb-llp.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

LIBERTYY INSURANCE CORPORATION

Case 3:22-cv-01535-E Document 4 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 93
______________________________________________________________________________________

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In accordance with the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, on October 25, 2022

a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing instrument was served via electronic 

service upon all counsel of record.

/s/ Colin Batchelor

COLIN BATCHELOR

Case 3:22-cv-01535-E Document 4 Filed 10/25/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 94