alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GERMANY LILLY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-2247-B (BH)

§ 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL §

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, § 

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of

the Court. The case will be dismissed by separate judgment for failure to prosecute or follow orders

of the Court.

DATED this 10th

day of April, 2023. 

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02247-B-BH Document 9 Filed 04/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 28
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 The Second Battle of Cowpens: South Carolina vs. Winchester, Virginia Joint and Combined Warfighting School, Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University
 JFSC Faculty, Pat Hannum published "The Second Battle of Cowpens: South Carolina vs. Winchester, Virginia" in Journal of the American Revolution. Published 19 March 2018.
 SHARE
 PRINT
  Battle of Cowpens Daniel Morgan Memorials
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Juliano, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                             
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ MARK JULIANO                                            
|                  |  |  |  | Mark Juliano                                                
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1838
JERRY LEE GENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RADFORD UNIVERSITY, The President and Dean of the School of Social Work, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-97-91-A) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se. Maureen Riley Matsen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Gent appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint for failure to state a claim. In Gent's complaint, he alleged that Radford University ("the University") denied his application for admission into a graduate studies program as a form of discrimination against him on the basis of his disability, in violation of both the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (1994), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (1994).Gent also moves to compel the University to explain why female students in a specific graduate seminar outnumbered the male students. As relief, he moves for full-time admission into the University'sgraduate program, or in the alternative, for $40,000 in compensatory damages. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gent v. Radford Univ. , No. CA-97-91-A (W.D. Va. June 19, 1997). Further, we deny Gent's motions to compel an explanation from the University regarding the gender compositionof one of its graduate seminars and we deny Gent's motion for remand, injunctive relief, or compensatory damages. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Structuring Joint Airpower to win in 2030

/ Published Feb. 12, 2019

JFSC's students published "Structuring Joint Airpower to win in 2030: Designing a Joint Division of Labor Between Land- and Sea-Based Combat Aviation". *Published: April 12, 2018.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDIVISION

I'NITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-081-01-H

DOLONTE DONTRELL FINCH,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GIJILTY

After reviewing all relevant mafters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections theleto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U'S'C'

0 636(bX1), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

sentence will be imposed in accordance with the court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERID.

Datedlanuary{2023.

JAMES SLEYHENDzuX

UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00081-H-BQ Document 24 Filed 01/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1800
In Re: ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE, Debtor.

_________________________ GEORGE E. MCDERMOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDREW CLIFFORD MOORE, Defendant - Appellee, and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-1822-PJM, BK-88-42746, AP-95-1249) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 29, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George E. McDermott, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: George E. McDermott appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to reopen his adversary proceeding against Andrew Moore alleging that confirmation of Moore’s Chapter 11 plan was obtained by fraud. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McDermott v. Moore , No. CA-97-1822-PJM; BK-88-42746; AP-95-1249 (D. Md. May 18, 1998). We deny McDermott’s motion for injunctive relief in which he sought to enjoin the enforcement of this court’s prior opinion, and we deny his motion for suggestion of removal from this court. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29682]



[[Page 69923]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-87-000]


Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company v. Tennessee Gas 
Pipeline Company; Notice of Complaint

November 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 13, 2000, Fitchburg Gas and Electric 
Light Company (Fitchburg) tendered for filing a Complaint against 
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee). The Fitchburg complaint 
asserts that Tennessee has unreasonably refused to waive certain 
restriction contained in Section 3.4(c) of its FS Rate Schedule and 
that Tennessee's failure to grant a waiver will interfere with 
Fitchburg's implementation of its state unbundling program. Fitchburg 
requests that the Commission order Tennessee to waive or modify its 
tariff to remove the limitation on a customer's right to release its 
capacity when the release is required by a state imposed mandatory 
capacity assignment program.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before November 24, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the 
complaint shall also be due on or before November 24, 2000. Comments 
and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of 
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29682 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|   | 1. | The Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               |            |
|--------------------|-----------------|
| Date: May 12, 2011 | By:   | /s/ Edward Yihua Kang |
|               |            | Edward Yihua Kang |
|               |            | Chief Executive Officer |
|               |            | (Principal Executive Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, OPERATIONS, AND CHANGES IN TRUST
CAPITAL AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,317,345
<SECURITIES>                                59,953,464
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,456,662
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,456,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,047,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,408,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,456,662
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,304,797
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,478,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               119,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,706,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,706,252
<EPS-BASIC>                                    83.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    83.67


</TABLE>
#### Margarita Dominguez, Appellant, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered on or about January 12, 1990, which granted, *inter alia,*defendant’s motion to the extent of directing plaintiff to submit to a neurological examination before trial while keeping the matter on the Trial Calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant moved to vacate the note of issue and to strike the action from the Trial Calendar so that it could conduct a neurological/psychological examination of plaintiff. Generally, the failure to move to vacate a note of issue and certificate of readiness within 20 days of service constitutes a waiver of the right to conduct a subsequent physical examination, absent a showing of special circumstances or adequate reason for the delay *(Sewell v Singh,*160 AD2d 592). Nevertheless, in certain circumstances where no prejudice would result, a party may be relieved of its waiver *(Williams v Long Is. Coll. Hosp.,*147 AD2d 558).

The instant record clearly establishes the need for a neurological/psychological examination of plaintiff by defendant in view of plaintiff’s physicians’ findings. In this regard, the prior orthopedic examination is irrelevant, as defendant is entitled to have the opinion of an expert in neurology, a different medical discipline. *(See, Rouen v Chrysler Credit Corp.,*145 AD2d 381, 382.) Further, there is no prejudice to plaintiff as the IAS court directed that the matter remain on the Trial *377Calendar. *(Williams v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., supra.)*Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Rosenberger, Asch and Wallach, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 222 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 222

 Authorizing the President to proclaim 1993 as ``America-the-Beautiful 
                                Year''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1993

    Mr. Studds introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the President to proclaim 1993 as ``America-the-Beautiful 
                                Year''.

Whereas the poem or hymn, ``America the Beautiful'' beloved of all Americans, 
        was written by the American poet and educator, Katharine Lee Bates, in 
        the year 1893;
Whereas the poem or hymn, ``America the Beautiful'', expresses and celebrates 
        certain fundamental American qualities and ideals; namely, the beauty 
        and fertility of our bountiful American land, the strength, skill, and 
        productivity of the American people, their courage and will, and the 
        American vision of freedom and a good life for all citizens; and
Whereas the need is already present, at the 100th anniversary of the writing of 
        the poem or hymn, ``America the Beautiful'', to rededicate the Nation's 
        energies to those qualities and ideals expressed and celebrated in the 
        hymn, and to reassert the responsibilities of free people to the proper 
        stewardship of their land and to the nurturing of the lives of their 
        fellow Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the year 
1993, the 100th anniversary of the writing of the poem or hymn, 
``America the Beautiful'', by Katharine Lee Bates, as ``America-the-
Beautiful Year'', which shall be dedicated, generally, to a 
reexamination of the American heritage and the American character, and 
which shall be dedicated to encouraging all the States, counties, 
cities, towns, and villages, and all industries, businesses, and 
institutions in the Nation, and all agencies and bureaus of the Federal 
Government, during America-the-Beautiful Year, to initiate or complete 
specific projects, to be designated as ``America-the-Beautiful Year 
projects'', that shall embody the principles of conservation, historic 
preservation, and enlightened planning, and that shall reflect the 
highest ideals of a free, responsible, and creative people.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 38

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2009

 Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Hoyer, 
  Mr. Wolf, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. 
   Edwards of Maryland, and Mr. Connolly of Virginia) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the 28th annual National 
Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law 
enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during 2008.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2009, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```