alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       17,707,000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      11,224,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               1,841,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,065,000
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    8,523,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          8,523,000
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                198,000
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    19,137,000
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        3,351,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        3,302,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                 (15,017,000)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                     13,650,000
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (9,445,000)
<NET-ASSETS>                                 8,523,000
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                               44,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 618,000
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      (724,000)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     4,022,000
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (3,780,000)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        (482,000)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                   (14,293,000)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    9,628,000
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,000
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                768,000
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         8,764,000
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             2.73
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                 (0.14)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                              0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                               2.54
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                      0


</TABLE>
United States District Court 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

GARY RAY RIKE § 

v. 4 CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-1530-S-BK 

PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES and U.S. : BANK NA § 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION 

 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in 

this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

Nee — 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED August 12, 2024. 

 

Case 3:22-cv-01530-S-BK Document 37 Filed 08/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1130
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 1 9 - 0 614

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY HANSEN ,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Counsel for Appellant has filed a 5 0 - day m otion for an extension of time to file the transcripts in the referenced matter. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension is DENIED . Appellant has 30 days, or until October 30 , 2020 , within which to file the transcripts . No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 25 2020

09/25/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0614
Case 2:22-cr-00110-Z-BR Document 37 Filed 02/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 87
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN P. BURKE                                                                                          
|                       |  |  |  | John P. Burke                                                                                                 
|                       |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Treasurer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Monday, January 25, 2010 Meeting January 25, 2010
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
3:15 to 4:00 p.m.

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance

January 25, 2010 Meeting Materials

**Presentations:**

2010 Council
  
Date Published: January 25, 2010
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
# Official Journal L 225/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 225 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6031 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 225

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6031 August 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1486 of 10 July 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 as regards benchmarking portfolios and reporting instructions (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1486 of 10 July 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 as regards benchmarking portfolios and reporting instructions (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1994-D,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and statment of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualifed in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         388,599
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  181,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               570,346
<PP&E>                                         4,542,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,479,178)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,633,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,267
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,589,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,633,707
<SALES>                                        650,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               671,325
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,146,951<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (549,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (549,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (549,747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  exepenses,  production  taxes and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interested expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# C_2015399EN.01000101.xml

| 1.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 November 2015

(2015/C 399/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0579 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70480 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2070 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0903 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,030 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,58 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2721 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4503 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0789 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4671 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4143 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1989 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6120 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4940 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 224,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2894 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7689 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 645,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5067 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,921 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,9854 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,926 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0709 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5569 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,5275 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0579

JPY

Japanese yen

130,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70480

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2070

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0903

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,030

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,58

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2721

RON

Romanian leu

4,4503

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0789

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4671

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4143

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1989

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6120

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4940

KRW

South Korean won

1 224,21

ZAR

South African rand

15,2894

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7689

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 645,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5067

PHP

Philippine peso

49,921

RUB

Russian rouble

69,9854

THB

Thai baht

37,926

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0709

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5569

INR

Indian rupee

70,5275

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Gerard Lollo *&*Sons, Inc., Respondent, v Marshall M. Stern, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated January 4, 1989, which denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the instant action for legal malpractice. In support of his motion to dismiss, the defendant argued that the plaintiff could not prevail on its legal malpractice claim, since the underlying contract action, which the defendant had been retained to prosecute, was lacking in merit as a matter of law. We disagree and conclude that questions of fact exist with respect to the potential merit of the underlying action *(see, Pacesetter Communications Corp. v Solin & Breindel,*150 AD2d 232, 233; *Mendoza v Schlossman,*87 AD2d 606, 607; *see also, Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe,*76 NY2d 38, 42; *Carmel v Lunney,*70 NY2d 169, 173; *Stroock, Stroock & Lavan v Beltramini,*157 AD2d 590, 591).

More specifically, the record reveals that questions of fact exist, *inter alia,*with regard to whether a supplier’s letter containing price quotations relating to a specified construction project constituted a bona fide offer giving rise to a binding contract. Notably, it has been held that "whether a price quote may be considered an offer in any given case is a question of fact dependent on the nature of the particular acts *607or conduct and the circumstances surrounding the transaction” *(Maurice Elec. Supply Co. v Anderson Safeway Guard Rail Corp.,*632 F Supp 1082, 1087; *see, Thomas J. Kline, Inc. v Lorillard, Inc.,*878 F2d 791, 794-795, *cert denied*— US —, 110 S Ct 1120; *Maryland Sup. Corp. v Blake Co.,*279 Md 531, 369 A2d 1017; *cf., Klienschmidt Div. v Futuronics Corp.,*41 NY2d 972, 973). We note in this respect that the defendant’s application was supported by the affirmation of an attorney who lacked personal knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the transaction in question. In contrast, the plaintiff opposed the motion, *inter alia,*by submitting the affidavit of the individual who was personally involved in the negotiations which ultimately led to the issuance of the disputed letter. Under these circumstances, it is our view that unresolved questions of fact exist with respect, *inter alia,*to the character of the letter, thereby warranting the denial of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1352 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify that the value 

of certain funeral and burial arrangements are not to be considered 

available resources under the supplemental security income program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2009 

Mr. POMEROY (for himself, Mr. WILSON of Ohio, Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, and Mr. GUTHRIE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

that the value of certain funeral and burial arrangements 

are not to be considered available resources under the 

supplemental security income program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUNERAL AND BURIAL ARRANGE4 MENTS NOT CONSIDERED RESOURCES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1613(e)(3) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382b(e)(3)) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1352 IH

1 ‘‘(C) If— 

2 ‘‘(i) an individual or the individual’s spouse en3 ters into an irrevocable contract with a provider of 

4 funeral goods and services for a funeral; 

5 ‘‘(ii) the individual or the individual’s spouse 

6 funds the contract by paying for the goods and serv7 ices; and 

8 ‘‘(iii)(I) the funeral provider subsequently 

9 places the funds in a trust or in escrow; or 

10 ‘‘(II) the individual or the individual’s spouse 

11 establishes an irrevocable trust, and the funeral pro12 vider is the named beneficiary of the trust, 

13 then the trust or escrow shall not be considered a resource 

14 available to the individual.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply to payments for supplemental 

17 security income benefits under title XVI of the Social Se18 curity Act for months beginning 90 days or more after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY JAY ADAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 128 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2022, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Motion to Vacate Judgment/Motion for 

Extraordinary Relief,” the “Motion to Order the Production of Documents,” and the “Motion 

to Appoint Counsel” are DENIED.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Kentucky  First
Bancorp,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  as filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on February 3, 2003 (the "Report"), I, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002  that,  to my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company


                                        By: /s/ Robbie Cox
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robbie Cox
                                            Title:  Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer



Date: February 3, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, André-Michel
Ballester, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the transitional
period April 25, 2015 to December 31, 2015 of LivaNova PLC; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 29, 2016



/s/ André-Michel BallesterAndré-Michel BallesterChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 4.1

                           CORONADO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                           16857 E. Saguaro Boulevard
                            Fountain Hills, AZ 85268


May 1, 2005


Coronado Employees and Consultants,

         The Company's  Board of Directors has decided to make  available to all
employees and consultants,  shares of the Company's common stock at a negotiated
price of not less than 90% of the lowest closing bid price during the week prior
to the employee's payday.

         To  participate  in this  program,  all you have to do is execute  this
letter in the space  below,  and  indicate  the amount of wages you wish to have
allocated  to this  Plan and the pay  period  from  which  your  salary  will be
credited. Your free-trading shares will be delivered to you within a few days.

                                        Coronado Industries, Inc.


                                        By:  /s/ Gary R. Smith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gary R. Smith, President




----------------------------            ----------------------------------------
Amount of Wages                         Employee Signature



----------------------------            ----------------------------------------
Pay Period From                         Name of Employee
Which To Be Paid                        (Please Print)
#### HOLLAND v. STATE.

No. 21340.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1941.

H. A. Coe, of Kountze, and Cain & Cain, of Liberty, for appellant.

R. M. Briggs, Dist. Atty., and B. A. Coe, .both of Kountze, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for rape, punishment assessed being five years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are in the record. Appellant complained of the court’s charge in several particulars, ’and requested a number of special charges which we find were incorporated in the main charge of the court. We are in no position to appraise the objections to the court’s instruction, nor to complaint of refusing any special charges in the absence of the facts. Scott v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 324, 119 S.W.2d 884; Lloyd v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 114 S.W.2d 544; Stephens v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 336, 136 S.W.2d 216.

Appellant set up in his motion for new trial misconduct of the jury. The facts developed on the hearing of the motion are not brought forward either in a bill of exception or by separate statement of facts. The findings of the trial judge as recited in the order overruling the motion are expressly against appellant on the averments in his motion.

The judgment is affirmed.