alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                  SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

             Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
 


                                         Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                              June 30,              June 30,
                                       --------------------- ---------------------
                                         1997        1996      1997        1996
                                       ---------   --------- ----------  ---------
<S>                                    <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>  
Primary earnings per share information:
  Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding during the 
     period                             5,001,913  4,999,293  5,000,176  4,000,090
  Annualized additional common
     shares due to stock options           13,897         -       5,965          -
                                       ---------- ---------- ----------  ---------
                                        5,015,810  4,999,293  5,006,141  4,000,090
                                       ========== ========== ========== ==========

  Net Earnings                         $1,695,000 $1,330,000 $4,181,000 $2,998,000

  Primary earnings per common share    $     0.34 $     0.27 $     0.84 $     0.75


Fully diluted earnings per share
information:              .
  Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding during the
     period                             5,001,913  4,999,293  5,000,176  4,000,090
  Annualized additional common
    shares due to stock options            18,082          -      7,360          -
                                       ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
                                        5,019,995  4,999,293  5,007,536  4,000,090
                                       ========== ========== ========== ==========

   Net earnings                        $1,695,000 $1,330,000 $4,181,000 $2,998,000
                                       ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

   Fully diluted earnings per common
   share                               $     0.34 $     0.27 $     0.83 $     0.75

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kang Yihua, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:    /s/ Kang Yihua             Kang Yihua

             Chief Executive Officer June 14 , 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6751

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KATERINE MARSELAS-YOWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-97-

085, CA-98-3699-AMD)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Katerine Marselas-Yowell, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,

United States Attorney, Joseph Lee Evans, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Katerine Marselas-Yowell appeals the district court’s order

closing the case. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Marselas-Yowell, Nos. CR-97-085; CA-98-3699-AMD (D. Md. May 19,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012138EN.01001101.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-243/07) (1)

(Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States - 2003 Act of Accession - Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination - Objective pursued by a provision of primary law - Decision 2007/361/EC)

(2012/C 138/17)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented: initially by E. Ośniecka-Tamecka, subsequently by T. Nowakowski, then by M. Dowgielewicz, and lastly by M. Szpunar, B. Majczyna and D. Krawczyk, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and A. Szmytkowska, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and R. Krasuckaitė, acting as Agents); and Slovak Republic (represented: initially by J. Čorba, and subsequently by B. Ricziová and M. Kianička, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/361/EC of 4 May 2007 on the determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination in relation to the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (OJ 2007 L 138, p. 14), in so far as it relates to the Republic of Poland

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2007/361/EC of 4 May 2007 on the determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination in relation to the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, in so far as it relates to the Republic of Poland; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2007/361/EC of 4 May 2007 on the determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination in relation to the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, in so far as it relates to the Republic of Poland;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland;

| 3. | Orders the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Lithuania to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Lithuania to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

---
(logo)TORCHLIGHT

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATIONJ.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C30,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2015-C30 (the “Trust”)

 

I, WilliamA. Clarkson, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer(the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to J.P. MorganChase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and withthe knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

I (orServicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the CertifyingServicer’s activities for the fiscal year 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) and theCertifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;and

 

Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects during the Reporting Period.  

 

 

Date:February 28, 2019

 

 

TORCHLIGHTLOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special

Servicer

 

 

By: /s/ William A. Clarkson

Name: William A. Clarkson

Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

280 Park Avenue, New York,NY 10017

T 212.883.2800  F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
Exhibit 33.7



|     |  |                                                               
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601 (312)
233-6440

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period
from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used the
servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo           
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
|January 18, 2016
#### SHACKLETT v. STATE.

No. 25996.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

■ George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty-., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES,.Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor in a dry area. The punishmeñt ássessed is a fine of $400.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regr ular form. ¡ '

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### TROELL v. CALLAWAY.

No. 10839.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 8, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1941.

R. R. Smith, of Jourdanton, and A. R. Troell, of Pleasanton, for appellant.

A. N. Steinl'e, of Jourdanton, and J. R. Garnand, of Pleasanton, for appellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an action in trespass to try title brought by appellant, Chas, T. Troell, against appellee, J. J. Callaway, for the recovery of the East 25 feet of Original Lot No. 36 of the Town of Pleasanton. Trial was to a jury, and upon its answer to one special issue judgment was rendered for Callaway.

On April 11, 1930, Wallis McCoy owned Lots Nos. 38 and 40, and the East 25 feet of Lot 36, of the town of Pleasanton, and 'on said date he executed a deed of trust covering Lots 38 and 40 to John C. Berry, trustee, for the benefit of J. H. Berry, securing an indebtedness of $375. This indebtedness was not paid and the trustee conveyed the two lots to J. H. Berry by trustee’s deed dated June 2, 1931. Berry conveyed the property to Callaway by deed dated August 18, 1934.

On the 7th day of March, 1939, Wallis McCoy conveyed the East 25 feet of Lot 36 to appellant, Chas. T. Troell. This tract is adjacent to the tract covered by the Berry deed of trust. On April 26, 1939, Troell filed this suit.

The appellee pleaded the ten-year statute of limitation, Article 5510, Vernon’s Tex. Civ.Stats., and that “Wallis McCoy about the 2nd day of June, 1931, delivered the adverse possession of said property to one J. H. Beery” and “that the aforesaid Wallis McCoy, about the 2nd day of June, 1931, abandoned to said J. PI. Berry, the title and possession of the property involved in this suit and never asserted any claim thereto, until he purportedly conveyed” the property to appellant.

The jury found that on or about June 2, 1931, Wallis McCoy did “deliver to J. H. Berry the adverse possession” of the tract of land here involved.

In our opinion, the judgment should have been rendered for appellant as the holder of the record title. As above point*1112ed out, Wallis McCoy, prior to June 2, 1931, held the fee simple title to all of Lots Nos. 38 and 40, as well as that part of Lot 36 now in controversy. His possession as the owner in fee simple could not be tacked upon the subsequent possession of Berry and Callaway in order to make out the prescriptive period designated by Article 5510. Evans v. Berlocher, 83 Tex. 612, 19 S.W. 158; 2 Tex.Jur. 166, sec. 87. Certainly, Wallis McCoy, the possessor, can not be considered as holding adverse to Wallis McCoy, the record owner.

It is the duty of this Court to render the judgment which should have been rendered by the trial court, and accordingly the judgment of the trial court is reversed and judgment here rendered that appellant recover of appellee the title and possession of the tract of land in controversy, together with his rents in the amount stipulated by the parties.

Reversed and rendered.
US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce D. Broussard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce D. Broussard                          
|Bruce D. Broussard                              
|Chief Executive Officer of                      
|US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc.
|                                                
|November 6, 2008
Case 4:22-cr-00257-P Document 91 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 52
Case 4:22-cr-00257-P Document 91 Filed 08/31/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 53
# Toward a More Lethal, Flexible, and Resilient Joint Force: Rediscovering the Purpose of JPME II

/ Published Feb. 14, 2019

JFSC Faculty, Charles Davis and Frederick R. Kienle published "Toward a More Lethal, Flexible, and Resilient Joint Force: Rediscovering the Purpose of JPME II" in Joint Forces Quarterly. Published JFQ 92, 22 Jan 2019.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |  |                                                                                                               
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2010 |  | /s/ JOHN P. BURKE                                                                                             
|                   |  | John P. Burke                                                                                                 
|                   |  | Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Treasurer
of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Northeast Indiana
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Randy J. Sizemore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Randy J. Sizemore
    ------------------------------
Name: Randy J. Sizemore
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
Staff upon request.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             24.
exv10w8



 






EXHIBIT 10.8




ENDORSEMENT NO. 2




Attached to and made a part of

AGREEMENT OF REINSURANCE

NO. 9034

between

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY COMPANY

PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANY

(herein collectively referred to as the “Company”)

and

GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION

(herein referred to as the “Reinsurer”)




IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that, as respects new and renewal policies of the Company becoming effective
at and after 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2005, and policies of the Company in force at 12:01 A.M.,
January 1, 2005, Section 7 of Exhibit A to this Agreement is amended to read:




“Section 7  —  REINSURANCE PREMIUM




The Company shall pay to the Reinsurer:





	 	(a)  	For the First Excess Cover, 2.50% of the Company’s Subject Earned
Premium;
	 
	 	(b)  	For the Second Excess Cover, 1.15% of the Company’s Subject Earned
Premium.”





IT IS FURTHER AGREED that, as respects Terrorism Occurrences taking place at and after 12:01 A.M.,
January 1, 2005, Exhibit B to this Agreement is hereby renewed subject to all its terms, conditions
and limitations, except as modified below, for a period of one year.




Accordingly, the first paragraph of Section 2 — TERM is amended to read:




“This Exhibit shall apply to new and renewal policies of the Company becoming effective at and
after 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2005, and to policies of the Company in force at 12:01 A.M., January
1, 2005, with respect to claims and losses resulting from Terrorism Occurrences taking place at and
after the aforesaid time and date, and prior to 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2006.”




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Endorsement to be executed




GENERAL REINSURANCE
CORPORATION

A Berkshire Hathaway Company




 









 








in duplicate,




this                      day of                                                             , 200                    ,




	 	 	 
	

	 	PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY COMPANY
	

	 	PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANY
	 
	 	 
	

	 	 
	

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Attest:                                                            
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	and this 14th day of March 200_5___.
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	

	 	GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
	 
	 	 
	

	 	Joan Lafrance, Vice President






Attest: Diane B. Hyland, Second Vice President




- 2 -

Endorsement No. 2

Agreement No. 9034

GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION