alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Idaho Operations Office, DOE. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of financial assistance solicitation. 

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (ID) is seeking applications for cost-shared research and development of technologies which will reduce energy consumption, reduce environmental impacts and enhance economic competitiveness of two or more of the following Industry of the Future Sectors: Aluminum, Steel, Forest Products, Glass, Agriculture, Chemicals, Metal Casting, Mining, and Petroleum Refining. The research is to address research priorities identified in Technology Roadmaps developed for the following Supporting Industries: Heat Treating, Forging, Welding, Industrial Process Heating and Advanced Ceramics. 

# DATES:

The issuance date of Solicitation Number DE-PS07-01ID14026 will be on or about November 20, 2000. The deadline for receipt of applications will be approximately on February 7, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        The solicitation in its full text will be available on the Internet at the following URL address:                         *http://www.id.doe.gov/​doeid/​PSD/​proc-div.html*                         or                         *http://e-center.doe.gov.*                         Applications should be submitted to: Seb Klein, Procurement Services Division, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office, 850 Energy Drive, Mail Stop 1221, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401-1563.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Seb Klein, Contract Specialist, kleinsm@id.doe gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The statutory authority for the program is the Federal Non-Nuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 1974                           ( print page 71096)                        (Pub. L. 93-577). The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number for this program is 81.086.                 

R.J. Hoyles, 

Director, Procurement Services Division.

[FR Doc. 00-30405 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-111-000]

Take notice that on November 17, 2000, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective December 20, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 51

Second Revised Sheet No. 52

Chandeleur Pipe Line Company asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's Order No. 587-L, Docket No. RM96-1, et al. issued June 30, 2000, 91 FERC ¶ 63,350, and the Commission's Order issued October 27, 2000, Docket No. RM96-1-014 et al., 93 FERC ¶ 61,093.

Chandeleur is filing tariff sheets implementing Imbalance Netting and Trading tariff provisions per 18 CFR 284.12(c)(2)(ii) adopted in Commission Order No. 587-G, issued April 16, 1998, 83 FERC ¶ 61,029.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30359 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

LEVONE RAY MADEN 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 5:22-CR-074-H-BQ-2 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the comt under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count Four of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

21 US.C. §§ 841(a)(J) and 84J(b)(J)(C), that is, Distribution and Possession with Intent 

to Distribute Fentanyl. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate 

judge finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00074-H-BQ Document 262 Filed 03/10/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 704
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed March 10, 2023. 

D.GO 

UNITED STATES MAGI RATE JUDGE 

Case 5:22-cr-00074-H-BQ Document 262 Filed 03/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 705
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1453

GONG-REN YANG, a/k/a Gui Wen Chen,

 Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United

States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A77-281-006)

Submitted: November 19, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

H. Raymond Fasano, MADEO & FASANO, New York, New York, for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S.

Wendtland, Assistant Director, Donald A. Couvillon, DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Yang raises no issues regarding the Convention Against

Torture claim in this court.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gong-Ren Yang, a native and citizen of the People’s

Republic of China, seeks review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s

denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture.* We have reviewed

the administrative record, the immigration judge’s decision, and

the order of the Board, and find that substantial evidence supports

the Board’s conclusion that Yang failed to sustain his burden of

showing past persecution or a well-founded fear of future

persecution, as required to establish eligibility for asylum. See

8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2004) (stating that the burden of proof is

on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). We will reverse the

Board only if the evidence “‘was so compelling that no reasonable

fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’”

Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. at 483-84). The evidence does not compel such

a result in this case.

In addition, we uphold the denial of Yang’s application

for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for

withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the
- 3 -

facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is

ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of

removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). 

We deny Yang’s petition for review. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

      ( print page 69801)    
Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee 172 meeting to be held December 5-7, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include: December 5: Plenary Session; (1) Introductory Remarks; (2) Review and Approve Agenda; (3) Working Group-2, AMS(R)S Avionics Equipment MOPS, (WG-2) Convenes to continue work of Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) document; December 6: (4) Working Group-3, AMS(R)S MASPS, (WG-3) Convenes to continue work of VDL 2 and VDL 3 Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) Document (may convene on Tuesday if WG-2 finishes early); December 7: (5) Plenary reconvenes; (6) Review of ICAO and Aeronautical Mobile Communications Panel (AMCP) activities; (7) Review Working Group activities; (8) Review Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) Changes; (9) Other Business; (10) Date and location of Next meeting; (11) Closing. Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 13, 2000.

Jancie L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-29663  Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
The Elco Corporation 1000 Belt Line Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-2800 • Tel (216) 749-2605 • Fax (216) 749-7462 

TSCA EXEMPTION REQUEST LETTER TO US EPA ....., 

= 

...., THE ELCO CORPORATION 

June 20, 2013 

c.... 

c::: 

~ O;;u -u,..., ~ "" -;,..., 

""' o:< ::ll! ~f'tl 

en C?c::J .. 

w 

0 

Document Control Office (DC0)(7407M) 

Office of Pollution Control and Taxies (OPPT) 

U.S. EPA l..t:m,., VOflUUI 1\IUrTlOer 

1200 Pennsylvania AvenueNW. 

Washington D.C. :20460 ·· · '' ) I 

;-,--.\I i . · ·j--. 

A~tn: 4Q. Cf8, Part 7P9.5089 ,(Docket #EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112) 

TSCA Section 4 HPV3 Testing Program 

The ELCO Corporation 

Application for Exemption from Testing for CAS#72162-15-3 (1-Decene, 

sulfurized) 

Cost Sharing with Dover Chemical Corporation 

Via Certified Mail: 7004 1160 0003 4669 1873 

To Whom It May Concern: 

354908 

The ELCO Corporation, 100 Belt Line Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-2800, 

hereby applies for an exemption from th,e test rwlerequirements referenced above on 

the basis that the required testing for 1-Decene, sulfurized (CAS#72162-15-3) is being 

conducted by another person, the Dover Chemical Corporation, 3676 Davis Road N.W., 

Dover, OH 44622. The ELCO Corporation has agreed with Dover Chemical to pay a 

percentage of the testing costs incurred by Dover Chemical in conducting the testing. 

Sincerely, 

~<4/tLJ,P 

Thomas W. Steib 

. Vice President Manufacturing 

. The Elco• Corporation 

· (440) 997-6131, ext. 201 

tsteib@elcocorp. com 

Worldwide Supplier of Spec;;ialty Chemicals Since 1927 

• 
WotdNida Suppler of Speda/tyC/wmicals SJnca 1927 

1000 Belt Une Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-2800 

I II 1111 ~ I 

7004 1160 0003 4669 1873 \P,A\LED FROM ZIP CODE L',4C04 

Document Control Office (DC0)(7407M) 

Office of Pollution Control and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. EPA 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington D.C. 20460 

-

~ 

~ ,., 

< 

m 

0 

c:-

c:: 

2 

......, 

-.! 

......, 

= 

2G4SG J JlJ Hjjzi jfjjH H;jp rJfji pi i jl; H jf •;m <J l ij rh} I i}Fifjlj]}p
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TBXAS

DALLAS DIVISTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

RAMON LUNA-ARREOLA (l),

Case N um b er : 3 :22-CR-003 77-M

Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

RAMON LUNA-ARREOLA (l), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir.

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. I l, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining RAMON LUNA-ARREOLA (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in

Rule I l, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense t charged is supported by

an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea

of guilty be accepted, and that RAMON LUNA-ARREOLA (l) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. $ S46lonspiracy to

Distribute a Controlled Substancerand have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by

the diyrict judge,

{ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

n The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3la3(a)(l) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

The Govemment does not oppose release.

The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or (c).

The Government opposes release.

The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 31a3(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3 145(c) why the defendant should not be detaigre{ and (2) the Coum finds by cl convincing evidence

that the defendant is not likely to flee or poseg da released.

Date: Octob er 3 , 2023 ,

NOTICI,

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen ( I 4) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved parry from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bX IXB).

$

$

$

$

$

$

s

n

n

tr

n

n

D

n

'any other per.sol or the co

Case 3:22-cr-00377-M Document 67 Filed 10/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 188
Case 7:22-cv-00113-O Document 20 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 402
Case 7:22-cv-00113-O Document 20 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 403
#### Ex parte DEE.

No. 22424.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1943.

Oliver W. Johnson, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Curtis Dee was charged by complaint in the justice court of Bexar County with having practiced the barber’s trade without a license, contrary, to the provisions of Article 734a of Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code.

Upon being convicted, he appealed the case to the county court where a fine of $50 was assessed and, being unable to appeal the case to this court, he filed application in the county court for writ of habeas corpus, in which he attacked the constitutionality of the article of the statute under which the prosecution was had. The judge refused to issue the writ and he then filed an application before this court on December 15, 1942, as an original proceeding. This application was set down for hearing on Wednesday, January 13, 1943, and bond allowed in the sum of $250 pending such hearing.

As we understand it, the application is presented solely on the ground that Article 734a of the Penal Code prohibiting the practice of the barber’s trade without first having secured a certificate of registration as a registered barber, issued in pursuance of the provisions of the article by the Board of Barber Examiners therein created, is unconstitutional. No brief has been filed in this cause and we are not advised upon what ground appellant seeks to have the act held unconstitutional.

So far as we are able to determine, the question which the petitioner attempts to raise here has not been before this court for consideration. However, numerous attacks have been made on the act before the courts of civil appeals and it has been consistently held to be constitutional in face of such attacks. Gerard v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 52 S.W.2d 347; Dendy v. Dartez, Tex.Civ.App., 108 S.W.2d 264; Turner v. Bennett, Tex.Civ.App., 108 S.W.2d 967; State Board of Barber Examiners v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 109 S.W.2d 1013; Lackey v. State Board of Barber Examiners, Tex.Civ.App., 113 S.W.2d 968.

Considering such holdings and in our view of the law, we do not find that ground has been alleged upon which a writ of habeas corpus should issue. The petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus is denied.