alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                               9
                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000   
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             15,404
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            581,482
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                        0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    17,389,440
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         23,121,062
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           23,355,400
<LOANS>                                        22,356,259
<ALLOWANCE>                                       213,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 64,651,177
<DEPOSITS>                                     45,780,689
<SHORT-TERM>                                    5,600,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               285,396
<LONG-TERM>                                     1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          112,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,872,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 65,651,177
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   466,116
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 674,746
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   13,416
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                1,154,278
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                634,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 65,284
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             454,691
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   267,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   200,594
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      125,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       2.87
<LOANS-NON>                                             0 
<LOANS-PAST>                                      707,850
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   707,850
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  213,034
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                           0
<RECOVERIES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 213,034
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              213,034
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           213,034
        


</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cr-00309-X Document 31 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 43
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Papa, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered March 22, 1985, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court improperly admitted into evidence the tape recording of an undercover narcotics transaction containing the statements of a nontestifying accomplice. We disagree. Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the statements in question were admissible against him pursuant to a recognized exception to the hearsay rule, i.e., as statements of a coconspirator made in the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy *(see, People v Sanders,*56 NY2d 51; *People v Salko,*47 NY2d 230; *People v Hodge,*141 AD2d 843). We note that the People established by prima facie proof the existence of a conspiracy between the declarant and the defendant "without recourse to the declarations sought to be introduced” *(People v Salko, supra,*at 238; *see, People v Bisnett,*144 AD2d 567; *People v Herman,*133 AD2d 377).

We also reject the defendant’s argument that the recording was improperly admitted into evidence on the ground of inaudibility. The law is well settled that a recording will be excluded only if it is so inaudible and unintelligible that a jury must speculate as to its contents *(see, People v Ely,*68 NY2d 520; *People v Carrington,*151 AD2d 687; *People v Morgan,*145 AD2d 442; *see also, People v Lubow,*29 NY2d 58, 68; *People v Carrasco,*125 AD2d 695). Upon our own review of the audio tape, we are in agreement with the determination of the trial court that the recording is both audible and intelligible and, therefore, was properly admitted into evidence. Further, the court did not err in providing a transcript of the recording to the jury as an aid in listening to the tape *(see, People v Lubow, supra; People v Mincey,*64 AD2d 615).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those set forth in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and *693find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or lacking in merit. Kooper, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1


 


John Neal To Retire as President


 


Richmond, Va., September 30, 2015 – Union Bank & Trust
today announced that John C. Neal, 66, plans to retire as President of the bank effective December 31, 2015.


 


“If you were to look up the definition of a true community
banker, you would most likely find a picture of John Neal as an example,” said G. William Beale, president and CEO of Union
Bankshares Corporation. “Through his contacts and reputation for delivering exceptional service, John was instrumental in
the growth of Union in the Fredericksburg region when he first joined in 1991 and later brought the same commitment and dedication
to his role as bank president. John has always understood that in order for a community bank to grow, it has to help the community
it serves grow. As a result, he played a significant role in the bank’s growth, both organically and through acquisition,
from $200 million to more than $7.5 billion today. While John will no longer be involved with Union on a day to day basis after
his retirement, we are fortunate that John has agreed to continue his service on the bank board as well as serve as an advisor
to management.”


 


Neal has served Union for nearly 25 years after working at another
regional financial institution for 15 years. Hired as a Vice President, Neal rose to Chief Credit Officer, Chief Operating Officer,
Chief Banking Officer before becoming, in 2004, only the fifth president of Union Bank & Trust Company in its 113 year history.
Neal serves on the Union Bank & Trust board as well as the Board of Directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and
was recently appointed to the board of trustees for the Graduate School of Banking at Louisiana State University.


 


“I have made a career in banking for almost 40 years,”
said Neal. “I am only retiring from my day-to-day job and look forward to continuing my involvement in banking through my
service on Union’s bank board as well other bank related boards.”


 


Following Neal’s retirement, Beale will assume the title
of president of Union Bank & Trust.


 


ABOUT UNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION


Headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, Union
Bankshares Corporation (NASDAQ: UBSH), is the holding company for Union Bank & Trust, which has 124 branches and approximately
200 ATMs throughout Virginia. Non-bank affiliates of the holding company include: Union Investment Services, Inc., which provides
full brokerage services; Union Mortgage Group, Inc., which provides a full line of mortgage products; and Union Insurance Group,
LLC, which offers various lines of insurance products.


 


Additional information on the company is
available at http://investors.bankatunion.com.


 


Contact: Bill Cimino (804) 448-0937,
VP and Director of Corporate Communications
#### W. P. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE *of*Texas, Appellee.

No. 22043.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1942.

Hutchison & Hutchison, of Paris, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of being drunk in a public place, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $1.00.

Since his appeal'to this court was perfected, the appellant has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking for the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29613]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation, Notice of Charter 
Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463), dated October 6, 1972, that the Veterans' Advisory Committee 
on Rehabilitation has been renewed for a 2-year period beginning 
November 9, 2000, through November 9, 2002.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
    By direction of the Secretary.
Marvin R. Eason,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29613 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 154 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 420
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 154 Filed 11/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 421
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 417

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for temporary extension of the application of the

final paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act

with respect to the dispute between the Soo Line Railroad Company and certain of its employees.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PROHIBITION.

4 The final paragraph of section 10 of the Railway

5 Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 160) shall apply and be extended

6 through February 28, 1995, with respect to the dispute

7 referred to in Executive Order No. 12925 of August 29,

8 1994. During this extension period no change, except by
2

•HJ 417 EH

1 agreement, shall be made by the rail carrier, the Soo Line

2 Railroad Company, or by the employees of such carrier

3 represented by the United Transportation Union, in the

4 conditions out of which the dispute arose as such condi5 tions existed before July 14, 1994.

Passed the House of Representatives October 3,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 417

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for temporary extension of the applicacertain of its employees. between the Soo Line Railroad Company and Railway Labor Act with respect to the dispute tion of the final paragraph of section 10 of the
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 

CESAR ARIEL PAZ (1),

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case Number: 3:22-CR-00418-M 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

CESAR ARIEL PAZ (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining CESAR ARIEL PAZ (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that CESAR ARIEL PAZ (1) be adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2) Illegal Reentry 

After Removal from the United States and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense 

by the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

Date: December 19, 2023. 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).

Case 3:22-cr-00418-M Document 26 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
Case 1:22-cv-00128-H-BU   Document 20   Filed 08/04/23    Page 1 of 2   PageID 1056

Case 1:22-cv-00128-H-BU   Document 20   Filed 08/04/23    Page 2 of 2   PageID 1057
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00044-Z-BR-2

§

JOSEPH ANTHONY DOMINGUEZ §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JOSEPH ANTHONY DOMINGUEZ, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining JOSEPH ANTHONY DOMINGUEZ under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned 

in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by 

an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea 

of guilty be accepted, and that JOSEPH ANTHONY DOMINGUEZ be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 

841(b)(1)(C) - DISTRIBUTION AND POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and

have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: July 28, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00044-Z-BR Document 50 Filed 07/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 124
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 72-3 Filed 03/11/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 858
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 72-3 Filed 03/11/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 859
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 72-3 Filed 03/11/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 860
# Official Journal L 336/21 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 336 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4821 December 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 336

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4821 December 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Council |
| | * | Decision No 2/2005 of the EU-Morocco Association Council of 18 November 2005 amending Protocol 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Council

*

Decision No 2/2005 of the EU-Morocco Association Council of 18 November 2005 amending Protocol 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
MEMORANDUM 

From: Dr. D. M. Navarro, SES 

Acting CG-1 

Reply to CAPT A. Williams 

Attn of: 202-475-5422 

To: CG PSC 

Subj: CORRECTING MILITARY RECORDS (COVID-19) 

Ref: (a) COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC 111557Z JAN23/ALCOAST 012/23

1. Subsequent to reference (a), CG PSC shall remove all CG-3307 (P&D-41(series)),

administrative remarks referencing the Coast Guard’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement from

active duty and reserve service members’ personnel data records.

2. The order of priority for removal of CG-3307s shall be as follows:

a. all members going before a board or panel (not later than 1 Jul 2023),

b. all members who return to active duty or Selected Reserve will have their records

corrected at that time,

c. members who have requested correction,

d. all remaining members (not later than 31 Dec 2023).

3. For service record-keeping purposes, CG PSC shall document who was discharged in

association with the Coast Guard’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement. The documentation should

include the basis for discharge, discharge characterization, reenlistment code, and date of

discharge.

4. Guidance for separated members will be provided via separate correspondence.

# 

Commandant 

United States Coast Guard 

2100 2nd Street, SW – Stop 7907 

Washington, DC 20593-7801 

Staff Symbol: CG-1 

Phone: (202) 475-5422 

1070 

Dr. Donna Mischell 

Navarro

Digitally signed by Dr. Donna 

Mischell Navarro 

Date: 2023.02.04 09:21:08 -05'00'

Exhibit 4

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 68-4 Filed 02/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1456
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce
D. Broussard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Bruce D. Broussard

Bruce D. Broussard
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERTO BATTLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 376 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.