alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte BELL.

No. 22001.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1942.

E. A. Berry, Jr., of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Petition is brought to the district court of Walker County seeking the release of Mona Bell from service in the penitentiary based on an indictment in Leon County and a trial in 1935 assessing a penalty of fifty years in the penitentiary.

It appears that the grand jury returned an indictment charging Mona Bell with robbery of R. E. Burroughs by an assault and by violence putting R. E. Burroughs in fear of life, etc., and by then and there exhibiting a fire arm. When the case was called for trial the appellant requested permission to plead guilty before the court without a jury. The judgment recited among other things that the court gave such consent; that the prosecuting attorney representing the state agreed in writing that he may do so, “and it appears that all prerequisite required by law for the waiving of this right have been performed”. Upon such basis the court recited such consent in the minutes.

It is also shown by docket entry, not included in the judgment, that the prosecuting attorney waived the right to ask for the infliction of the death penalty.

Upon this record it is contended that the crime being one punishable by death, it was not permissible for the party on trial to waive a jury and plead guilty before the court. This identical question was before the court in Ex parte Wagnon, 136 Tex.Cr. R. 364, 125 S.W.2d 572, 573, and the holding was contrary to such contention. It is there said that, “if the indictment * * * charged relator with robbery by assault and violence and by putting the party robbed in fear of life and bodily injury, and by using a firearm, the State could abandon that part of the indictment alleging the use of a firearm, and relator could then waive a jury and enter his plea of guilty to ordinary robbery before the court without a jury”. Gonzales v. State, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 248, 226 *893S.W. 405; Sweeney v. State, 103 Tex.Cr. R. 393, 281 S.W. 571. We find no material difference between the question presented here and that decided by the court in the Wagnon case.

Furthermore, in his answer to the charge the warden of the penitentiary answered under oath that the appellant was being held by virtue of a judgment out of the district court of Rusk County, Texas. No attack is made on this judgment and the record does not show what proof was made on this issue, but the order of the district court from which this appeal comes might well be 'sustained on that ground were it not conclusively shown that he was properly held by the conviction attacked.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ R. Dale Ross                                                           
|R. Dale Ross                                                               
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology
Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc.
|                                                                           
|May 7, 2007
# Official Journal C 382/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 382 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5728 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 382

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5728 October 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 382/01 | Call for proposals — EACEA/31/2014 — Erasmus+ Programme, Key Action 3 — Support for Policy Reform — Civil Society Cooperation in the field of Education and Training and Youth | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2014/C 382/01

Call for proposals — EACEA/31/2014 — Erasmus+ Programme, Key Action 3 — Support for Policy Reform — Civil Society Cooperation in the field of Education and Training and Youth

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 404

Designating March 26, 1995, as ‘‘Native American Heritage Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 18, 1994

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating March 26, 1995, as ‘‘Native American

Heritage Day’’.

Whereas Native Americans are the original inhabitants of the

lands and now constitute the United States of America;

Whereas Native American governments developed the fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separation

of powers in government, and these principles form the

foundation of the United States Government today;

Whereas Native Americans have served with valor in all wars

from the Revolutionary War to the conflict in the Persian

Gulf;
2

•HJ 404 IH

Whereas Native Americans have contributed immensely to the

United States and the rest of the world in many areas,

including the arts, languages, music, medicine, and agriculture; and

Whereas Native Americans deserve recognition for their individual contributions to American Society as artists, sculptors, musicians, authors, poets, artisans, scientists, and

scholars: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That March 26, 1995, is designated as ‘‘Native American

4 Heritage Day’’, and the President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation each year calling upon

6 Federal, State, and local governments, interested groups

7 and organizations, and the people of the United States to

8 observe each such day with appropriate programs, cere9 monies, and activities.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1184 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Private Calendar No. 9
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1184

                          [Report No. 103-580]

                   For the relief of Jung Ja Golden.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1993

Mr. Edwards of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             June 30, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Jung Ja Golden.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR JUNG JA GOLDEN.

    (a) In General.--Jung Ja Golden shall be classified as an immediate 
relative within the meaning of section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval of a relative 
visa petition filed under section 204 of such Act by Jung Ja Golden and 
the filing of an application for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Jung Ja Golden enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed by Jung Ja Golden with appropriate fees within 2 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Jung Ja Golden, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the 
following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas available 
under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                     

                                                 Private Calendar No. 9

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1184

                          [Report No. 103-580]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                   For the relief of Jung Ja Golden.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 30, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 1953

_____________________________
P AUL E. K NIGHT , Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. John C. Cooper , Judge

. September 28, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , M AKAR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Paul E. Knight, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for App ellee.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 NDU Interim Provost Visits JFSC
 On November 8th 2021, JFSC was honored to host Dr. Cynthia Watson, Interim Provost, National Defense University.  During her visit, she addressed the JFSC faculty, and took the opportunity to learn more about our JAWS, JCWS, JC2IOS School Houses. This included a walking tour of the JC2IOS and SCIF spaces, updated JCWS classrooms, the world class JFSC library, and innovative wargame Suites. During her visit, Dr. Watson observed a JAWS lesson taught by Dr. Tony Feagin, and participated in a JCWS-Hybrid seminar on Course of Action development, taught by LTC Christopher Botterbusch. Highlights of the day also included Dr. Watson conducting a Townhall session, as well as an informal faculty lunch, where Dr. Watson received questions and helped the staff understand NDU priorities, challenges, and perspectives.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Decision on the system of the European Communities' own resources (//EC, Euratom)

COM(2006) 99 final — 2006/0039 (CNS)

(2006/C 309/21)

On 26 April 2006, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The EESC Bureau assigned preparation of the Committee's work on the subject to the Section for Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion.

In view of the urgency of the work, the European Economic and Social Committee decided at its 428th plenary session of 5 and 6 July 2006 (meeting of 5 July 2006) to appoint Ms Cser as rapporteur-general, and adopted the following opinion by 84 votes to 2, with 2 abstentions:

1.   Summary of the opinion

2.   The EESC's approach, as the representative of organised civil society

3.   Introduction

4.   The EU's financial perspective for 2007-2013 subsequent to the December 2005 European Council decision

5.   The system of own resources

During two years of negotiation on the financial perspective, little attention was paid to the system of own resources as a whole.

6.   The working document on the UK rebate

7.   General comments

8.   Summary

Brussels, 5 July 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)OJ C 253, 7.10.2000

(2)OJ C 74, 23.3.2005.

----
Agenda 

May 2003 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – April 25, 2003 

Dealer ___________________

To allow more time for discussion on Thursday, please e-mail your responses prior to 4:00 p.m. on 

Wednesday to Jeff Huther, Dept. of Treasury, at Jeff.Huther@do.treas.gov and Richard Dzina, Federal 

Reserve Bank of New York, at richard.dzina@ny.frb.org. If you are not scheduled to meet with 

Treasury officials this quarter, your responses would still be very helpful to us, particularly answers to 

the discussion questions. Thank you. 

I. Borrowing Estimates Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 April – June 

 Ending Cash Balance 

 July – September 

 Ending Cash Balance 

 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

 FY2003 

 FY2004 

 

III. Quarterly Note Issuance 

 3-year 

 5-year 

 5-year reopening 

 10-year 

 10-year TIIS 

IV. Discussion Topics 

• Are you seeing significant customer interest in the 3-year note? What types of customers are likely 

to be the largest sources of demand? How much growth potential do you see in this market? 

• In the last refunding statement Treasury announced that the May 5-year note would be reopened in 

June and that, should financing requirements increase, we would consider either moving to 

monthly 5-year notes or reopened 10-year notes. Given evidence that Treasury faces higher 

financing needs, should Treasury move to monthly 5-year notes or reopened 10-year notes? What 

should the timing be for this next move?

• Following 9/11, Treasury postponed and then cancelled a 4-week bill auction. This experience has 

led us to examine the need for more explicit criteria for our responses to auction disruptions. We 

would like to begin a discussion with auction participants about the need for laying out our 

responses ahead of auction disruptions and, if the need exists, what form they would take. 

Under what circumstances should Treasury consider postponing a scheduled auction? What factors 

should Treasury consider when determining whether to post pone the auction? Are there other 

auction modifications that Treasury may need to consider when the market is operating in a 

contingency or extraordinary environment?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      26,668,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,009,911
<PP&E>                                         165,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,070,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          556,929
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,388
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,510,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,070,316
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,000,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,158,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,254,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,254,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,254,673
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29946]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC01-4-000]


Consumers Energy Company; Notice of Filing

November 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 2, 2000, Consumers Energy Company 
(CECo) filed an amendment to their Application For Authorization to 
Transfer Jurisdictional Transmission Assets To Michigan Electric 
Transmission Company pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, 
which was filed on October 13, 2000 in the above-captioned docket. CECo 
and Michigan Transco are requesting that the existing one-page pro 
forma Bill of Sale be removed from Exhibit H(4) and be replaced with 
the two-page amended pro forma Bill of Sale.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before November 29, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29946 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kim Taylor, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Huntington Auto Trust 2015-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);





2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.








By:     /s/ Kim Taylor


Name:     Kim Taylor


Title:       Senior Vice President, The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer





Date: March 16, 2017