alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice No. 3464] 

                    The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation will meet in the Department of State, 2201 “C” Street NW, Washington, D.C., December 11-12, 2000 in Conference Room 1105. Prior notification and a valid photo are mandatory for entrance into the building. One week before the meeting, members of the public planning to attend must notify Gloria Walker, Office of Historian (202-663-1124) providing relevant dates of birth,                           ( print page 70757)                        Social Security numbers, and telephone numbers.                 

The Committee's sessions from 1:30 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, December 11, 2000, will be closed in accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The agenda calls for discussions of agency declassification decisions concerning the Foreign Relations series. These are matters not subject to public disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and the public interest requires that such activities be withheld from disclosure. The remaining session of the Committee will meet in open session from 9:00 a.m. through 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 12, 2000, to discuss transfer of Department of State electronic records to the National Archives and Records Administration and the modernization of the Foreign Relations series. 

                    Questions concerning the meeting should be directed to David Patterson, Acting, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, Department of State, Office of the Historian, Washington, DC, 20520, telephone (202) 663-1127, (e-mail                     *history@state.gov*).                 

Dated: November 17, 2000.

David Patterson, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-30141  Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-11-U
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JACQUIN JOHN CARR,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 413 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00050

- CR

April OLIVAREZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR9337

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED March 25, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
Exhibit 34.7



|     |  |                                                                                                                              
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Plante & Moran, PLLC
10 South Riverside Plaza 9th Floor Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.207.1040 Fax:
312.207.1066 plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the Company) compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has determined
that only certain servicing criteria, 1112(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by
this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a
sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have
occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLCC

Chicago, IL

January 18, 2016



LOGO
JAMES DEERFIELD COOK II

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5744

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Charles W. Dodson , Judge

. James Deerfield Cook II, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of a ppellant’s response to the Court’s order of

December 22, 2016, the Court has determined that a ppellant failed to invoke the

Court’s jurisdiction in a timely manner. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, J J

. , CONCUR.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  Contact Us: **Email:**Registrar2@ndu.edu**Phone:** (757) 443-6124; DSN 646-6124**Fax:** (757) 443-6026; DSN 646-6026**Mailing Address:**
Joint Forces Staff College
Office of the Registrar
7800 Hampton Boulevard
Norfolk, VA 23511
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    JFSCFooterRight
    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIYISION

UNITED STATES OF AMEzuCA,

Plaintiff,

BRANDON SCOTT WHITLEY,

DefendantOR.DER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE I,JNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance wift 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OX1), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated Decemb ", 

7^ ,2022.

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NO. 1:22-CR-O59-01-H

NLO/L

Case 1:22-cr-00059-H-BU Document 22 Filed 12/20/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 46
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 24, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00840-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF G.N.D.M., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-22-03353 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Carlyle, Goldstein, and Kennedy 

Opinion by Justice Goldstein 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to 

our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without 

a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by January 13, 2023. By 

postcard dated January 17, 2023, we informed appellant his brief was overdue and 

directed him to file his brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

220840F.P05 

 

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/

BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF G.N.D.M., 

A CHILD 

No. 05-22-00840-CV 

 On Appeal from the 256th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-22-03353. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Goldstein. Justices Carlyle and 

Kennedy participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered February 24, 2023
Date: September 4 , 2014

From: David Cole, EPA , Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

To: Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

- 0734 Subject: Meeting with Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association

- Proposed Standards of

Performance for New Residential Wood Heater s, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced Air Furnaces, and New Residential Masonry Heaters
On September 4 , 2014, the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association and other industry representatives , at their request, met with representatives of EPA. The purpose of the meeting was for HPBA and one of their members to express their concerns about several provisions of the proposed standards as the Agency continues to develop the final rule. Their specific areas of concern were third

- party certification, compliance dates and elect ronic reporting.
Attending the meeting were — Industry: Jack Goldman , HPBA ; John Crouch , HPBA ; David Chung, Crowell & Moring

(Counsel for HPBA); Rick Curkeet, Intertek EPA/OECA : Ed Messina , Julius Banks, Rafael Sanchez EPA/OAQPS: By telephone

- Gil Wood, Mike Toney, Amanda Aldridge, David Cole
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick McDaniel, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered April 7, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court erred in denying, after conducting a hearing, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress an eyewitness’s identification of him as one of the perpetrators. The record reveals that at the hearing, the witness testified that he had frequently seen the defendant in his neighborhood over the past 2 to 3 years. We find that the court properly concluded that the identification procedure used by the police was more in the nature of a confirmation rather than an identification and hence, the issue of suggestiveness was not relevant *(see, People v Stevens,*109 AD2d 856, 857). Therefore, the court properly declined to suppress the witness’s identification testimony without conducting a full *Wade*hearing.

The defendant’s challenge to two of the trial court’s eviden*641tiary rulings are without merit. The trial court properly ruled that the prosecutor could elicit information regarding an alleged prior robbery of $2,000 from the codefendant or one of his acquaintances by the deceased or one of his acquaintances since this information tended to prove a motive for the shooting death of the victim *(see,*Richardson, Evidence §§ 170-171 [Prince 10th ed]). Furthermore, the court properly precluded the defense from eliciting on the cross-examination of the arresting officer an exculpatory statement made by the defendant to the officer upon his arrest. The court correctly concluded that the statement was hearsay and did not satisfy the requirements of a statement against penal interest.

The defendant’s allegations of errors in the court’s charge to the jury are not preserved for our review since the defense counsel did not request the specific charge concerning transitory or innocent possession of the weapon nor did the defense counsel object to the court’s charge on manslaughter in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, or justification *(see, People v Graham,*122 AD2d 162).

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Arrocha,*151 AD2d 490). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1191 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1191

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit citizenship at 
birth, merely by virtue of birth in the United States, to persons with 
                   citizen or legal resident mothers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

 Mr. Gallegly (for himself, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Archer, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
Doolittle, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Kasich, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Young of Alaska, 
Mr. McCandless, Mr. Stump, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Emerson, and Mr. 
  McCollum) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit citizenship at 
birth, merely by virtue of birth in the United States, to persons with 
                   citizen or legal resident mothers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITING CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH, MERELY BY VIRTUE OF BIRTH IN 
              THE UNITED STATES, TO PERSONS WITH LEGAL RESIDENT 
              MOTHERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 301(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1401(a)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon the 
following: ``, of a mother who is a citizen or legal resident of the 
United States''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to persons born after the date of ratification of an article of 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States that repeals the 
first sentence of section 1 of the fourteenth article of amendment to 
the Constitution of the United States.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70690-70691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resource Conservation Service


Holbrook Lake Ditch Watershed, Otero County, CO

AGENCY: Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of a finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resource Conservation Service 
Regulations (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resource Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Holbrook 
Lake Ditch Watershed Project, Otero County, Colorado.
    For further information contact Stephen F. Black, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resource Conservation Service, 655 Parfet St., 
Lakewood, Colorado, 80215-5517, telephone (303) 236-2886, ext. 202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Stephen F. Black, State Conservationist, 
has determined that the preparation and review of an environmental 
impact statement are not needed for this project.
    The project purpose is to reduce selenium, sediment and other 
pollutant loading to the Arkansas River due to ineffective irrigation 
water utilization. The planned works of improvement include on-farm 
underground irrigation pipelines, on-farm concrete irrigation ditches, 
land leveling, and underground drains. These enduring practices are 
accompanied by facilitating management practices such as Residue 
Management (seasonal).
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
Federal, State and Local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy 
requests at the above address. Basic data developed during the 
environmental assessment are on file and may be reviewed by contacting 
Stephen F. Black.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be

[[Page 70691]]

taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10904, Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials.)
Michael A. Gillespie,
Snow Survey Supervisor, Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 00-30061 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M