alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Council on Disability 

An independent federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress 

to enhance the quality of life for all Americans with disabilities and their families

Agency Shutdown Plan

September 29, 2021

1. PURPOSE: To provide the National Council on Disability’s (“NCD”) policy

guidance and instructions for actions to be taken when Congress fails to enact 

either regular appropriations, a continuing resolution, or needed supplemental, 

resulting in an interruption of fund availability. In the absence of appropriations:

• NCD officers may not incur any obligations that cannot lawfully be fundedfrom 

prior appropriations unless such obligations are otherwise authorized by law.

• NCD officers may incur obligations as necessary for orderly termination of an 

agency's functions, but funds may not be disbursed.

2. SCOPE: This plan applies to all NCD personnel including the nine Special 

Government Employees (private citizen Presidential and Congressional

appointees.)

3. POLICY: In order to execute an orderly shutdown, the following information

is provided:

• Estimated time to complete shutdown: One half-day;

• Number of on-board employees prior to execution: 11;

• Number of employees retained under plan: 0;

• Executive Director, on behalf of the Chair, will notify OMB that shutdown 

procedures have initiated;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations or designee will notify 

building management of shutdown status;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations will notify all agency 

personnel of shutdownstatus and will initiate action to issue furlough notices and 

other instructions as appropriate;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations will direct Contracting 

Officer's Representatives to notify agency contractors of shutdown status and 

other instructions as appropriate;

• Director of Administration, Finance and Operations will direct Network Consultant 

to ensure serversand other IT equipment are secured; and

• Agency personnel will be instructed to obtain information from news outlets for 

when a continuing resolution or an FY 2022 appropriation has been approved 

and that they will be expected to return to work on their next regularly scheduled 

workday.
1331 F Street, NW ■ Suite 850 ■ Washington, DC 20004

202-272-2004 Voice ■ 202-272-2022 Fax ■ www.ncd.gov

4. REFERENCES:

• OMB Circular No. A-ll (2015), Section 124.2, pages 1-2

• OMB Memo M-13-22, Planning for Agency Operations during a Potential

Lapse in Appropriations (and attachments), September 17, 2013.

5. REVIEW: This Agency Shutdown Plan has been prepared, with the 

assistance of NCD’s Director of Administration, Finance, and Operations as well 

as the Executive Director, and reviewed by the undersigned. It complies with 

guidance provided in the reference documents.

Respectfully,

Andrés J. Gallegos

Chairman
1 Pinkerton v. United States

, 328 U.S. 640, 646-47, 66 S.Ct.

1180, 1183-84, 90 L.Ed. 1489 (1946). UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit

No. 94-60023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

RAUL QUIROZ-HERNANDEZ, ALFONSO HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ and

SERVANDO LOPEZ

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(May 8, 1995)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion, March 16, 1995, 5th Cir., 1995, _____F3d_____)

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, GARWOOD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF THE COURT:

In his petition for rehearing, Raul Quiroz-Hernandez (Quiroz)

points ou t that his possession conviction cannot be sustained on

the basis of coconspirator liability given that a P inkerton 1

instruction was not given to the jury. We take note of this fact

and, accordingly, substitute the following in place of Part III, A,2 The jur y was properly instructed by the district court

regarding 18 U.S.C. §2, the aiding and abetting statute.

2 2 of our opinion:

2.

"Quiroz also contests his possession conviction. As explained

above, to sustain such a conviction the government must prove that

each defendant knowingly possessed the cocaine with the intent to

distribute. Possession can be either actual or constructive, joint

among several defendants, and established by circumstantial

evidence. U nited States v. Lopez

, 979 F.2d 1024, 103 1 (5th Cir.

1992), cert. denied

, ---U .S.---, 113 S.Ct. 2349, 124 L.Ed.2d 258

(1993). The government proceeded on the theory that Quiroz aided

and abetted in the possession with the intent to distribute the

cocaine. 2 To prove aiding and abetting in a criminal venture, the

prosecution must prove that the defendant (1) associated with the

criminal enterprise, (2) participated in the venture, and (3)

sought by action to make the venture succeed. U nited States v.

Casilla

, 20 F.3d 600, 603 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, ---U.S.---, 115

S.Ct. 240 (1994). The evidence supporting a conspiracy conviction

typically supports an aiding and abetting conviction. Id.

Based on the conspiracy evidence discussed above, a reasonable

jury could find that Quiroz will fully associated with the codefendants in this criminal venture. Also, given the evidence

linking Quiroz to the transportation of the cocaine, the jury could

determine that he took affirmative steps to further its possession

and distribution. Furthermore, in light of the large amount of3

cocaine involved, the jury could conclude that Quiroz intended to

distribute the drug. Thus, the evidence is sufficient to support

Q uiroz' conviction for aiding and abetting in the possession and

distribution of cocaine."

Outside of this substantive change, the panel adheres to its

prior opinion and the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. No member

of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on th e Court

having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc,

(FRAP and Local Rule 35) the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is

also DENIED.
Case 5:22-cr-00099-H-BQ Document 10 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 28
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29548]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
10 a.m. on Tuesday, November 21, 2000, to consider the following 
matters:
    Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items is 
anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a 
member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the 
discussion agenda.
    Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' meetings.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Interim Rule (amending Appendix C to 
Part 325) to Revise the Risk-Based Capital Treatment for Securities 
Borrowing Transactions.

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Regulation Prescribing Consumer 
Protections for Bank Sales of Insurance.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2089 (Voice); (202) 416-
2007 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information, concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: November 14, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29548 Filed 11-4-00; 5:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
Edna Earnest Taylor and 

Elizabeth Earnest /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 17, 2014

No. 04-13-00445-CV

PNP PETROLEUM I, LP and PNP Management, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Edna Earnest TAYLOR and Elizabeth Earnest Herbst.,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-05-00167CVF

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Post-Submission Brief is 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1243

To prohibit any foreign person from acquiring, directly or indirectly, Allison

Transmission, a division of General Motors Corporation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1993

Mr. TORRICELLI (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. PALLONE, Mr.

GILMAN, and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, and Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit any foreign person from acquiring, directly or

indirectly, Allison Transmission, a division of General

Motors Corporation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the M1 tank program is critical to the

6 United States Armed Forces;

7 (2) the importance of the M1 tank program, in

8 particular, was demonstrated most recently during

9 Operation Desert Storm;
2

•HR 1243 IH

1 (3) a foreign manufacturer of transmissions has

2 proposed to acquire Allison Transmission, a division

3 of General Motors Corporation that is the sole pro4 vider of high technology transmissions equipment for

5 the M1 tank program;

6 (4) this acquisition would force the United

7 States Army to rely on a foreign source for such

8 critical equipment; and

9 (5) the sale or other transfer to a foreign per10 son of a United States business concern that is criti11 cal to the defense industrial base of the United

12 States would be detrimental to the national security

13 interests of the United States.

14 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACQUISITION.

15 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi16 sion of law or any agreement to the contrary, no foreign

17 person shall acquire, directly or indirectly, ownership or

18 control of Allison Transmission, a division of General

19 Motors Corporation.

20 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—The Attorney General shall

21 seek appropriate relief, including injunctive or divestment

22 relief, in the district courts of the United States in order

23 to carry out this section.
3

•HR 1243 IH

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

2 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘foreign person’’

3 means—

4 (1) an individual who is not a citizen of the

5 United States or an alien admitted for permanent

6 residence to the United States;

7 (2) a corporation, partnership, or other non8 government entity which is created or organized

9 under the laws of a foreign country or which has its

10 principal place of business outside the United States;

11 and

12 (3) a foreign state as defined in section 1603

13 of title 28, United States Code.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



US Oncology, Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.
Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|/s/ R. Dale Ross                            
|R. Dale Ross                                
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology, Inc.
|                                            
|August 11, 2005                             



-42-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-020-1220-XQ]


Sierra Front-Northwestern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council--
Notice of Meeting--Agenda Amendment, Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Amend the Federal Register Notice, published November 1, 2000 
for the Special Resource Advisory Council Meeting--Black Rock Desert 
Management Plan, to include discussion of the Southern Nevada Public 
Lands Management Act acquisition nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), a Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Resource Advisory Council 
meeting will be held as indicated below. Topics for discussion include 
the review of public comments received on the Black Rock Desert 
Management Plan, and the time line proposed for completion of the final 
management plan and environmental impact statement. The second round of 
Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act acquisition nominations 
will also be discussed. This meeting is open to the public. The public 
comment period for the Black Rock Desert Management Plan will begin at 
11 a.m. The public comment period for the Southern Nevada Public 
Management Act will begin at 3 p.m. The public may present written 
comments to the Council. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
further information about the meeting, should contact Les Boni at the 
Winnemucca Field Office, BLM, 5100 E. Winnemucca Blvd., Reno, Nevada 
89445, or by telephone at (775) 623-1500.

LOCATION, DATE AND TIME: The Council will meet on Monday, December 4, 
2000, beginning at 9 a.m. and may continue into the evening, at the 
Fernley Town Complex, 595 Silver Lace Blvd., Fernley, Nevada.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Les Boni, Assistant Field Manager 
Nonrenewable Resources, Winnemucca Field Office, 5100 E. Winnemucca 
Blvd., Winnemucca, Nevada 89445, telephone (775) 623-1500.

    Dated: November 12, 2000.
Terry A. Reed,
Winnemucca Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-30062 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc., Trump Entertainment
Resorts Holdings, L.P., and Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc. (the Registrants) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Dale R. Black, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrants, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrants.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    DALE R. BLACK                                                                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.         
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    DALE R. BLACK                                                                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    DALE R. BLACK                                                                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kelvin Moye, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered August 21, 1987, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 4 to 8 years, as a violent predicate felony offender, the sentence to run consecutive to a sentence imposed by the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J.), rendered on January 12, 1988, unanimously affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second *287degree in exchange for a promised sentence of 4 to 8 years, pending the court’s review of the probation report. At sentencing, the defendant unsuccessfully sought to withdraw his plea. Defendant was found to be a violent predicate felon, and the court enforced the promised sentence of 4 to 8 years to run consecutive to the sentence from a pending case in the Bronx.

On appeal the defendant argues that his motion to withdraw his plea should have been granted, and that he was misadvised by his lawyer that the sentences from the two separate cases were to run concurrently, not consecutively. The record clearly shows that the plea was knowing and voluntary, and that nowhere was the defendant promised concurrent sentences. The court properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea. A defendant cannot dispute a plea of guilty where there is no claim the plea was entered involuntarily and where the court conducted a thorough examination of the defendant who acknowledged his guilt. *(People v Cornett,*45 AD2d 778.) Further, defendant’s argument concerning the performance of counsel was not raised prior to sentencing and no ineffectiveness appears on the face of the record now submitted. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10780

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Joseph Michael Dupree, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-36-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joseph Michael 

Dupree has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dupree has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10780 Document: 00516723182 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/24/2023

Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 50 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 223
No. 22-10780

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10780 Document: 00516723182 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/24/2023

Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 50 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 224
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

N o
. 1 2

- 4 0 8 1 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. I G N A C I O E S T E B A N C O N T R E R A S

- M E Z A , a l s o k n o w n a s T i t o C o n t r e r a s M e z a , a l s o k n o w n a s T i t o R o m e r o , a l s o k n o w n a s I g n a c i o T i t o C o n t r e r a s - M e z a , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 5 : 1 2

- C R

- 1 1 0

- 1

B e f o r e D A V I S , S O U T H W I C K a n d H I G G I N S O N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t I g n a c i o E s t e b a n C o n t r e r a s - M e z a h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n

a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s

v
. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 1 )

. C o n t r e r a s - M e z a h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’s b r i e f a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D J uly 24, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* P u r su a n t t o 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 7

. 5 , t h e c o u r t h a s d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h i s o p i n i o n sh o u l d n o t b e p u b l i sh e d and is not p r e c e d e n t e x c e p t u n d e r t h e l i m i t e d c i r c u m s t a n c e s s e t f o r t h i n 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 7

. 5

. 4

. Case: 12-40813 Document: 00512319590 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2013N o
. 1 2

- 4 0 8 1 3

r e f l e c t e d t h e r e i n , a s w e l l a s C o n t r e r a s - M e z a ’s r e s p o n s e
. W e c o n c u r w i t h

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r

a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w
. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C IR

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 12-40813 Document: 00512319590 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2013