alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1063 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1063

 To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications 
 and Records Commission for fiscal year 1994 through fiscal year 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

  Mr. Sharp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications 
 and Records Commission for fiscal year 1994 through fiscal year 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Paragraph (1) of subsection (f) of section 2504 of title 44, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking out ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking out the period and 
        inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
                    ``(D) $12,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1994 
                and 1995;
                    ``(E) $15,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1996 
                and 1997; and
                    ``(F) $18,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1998 
                and 1999.''.

SEC. 2. SEPARATE APPROPRIATION REQUIREMENT.

    Subsection (f) of section 2504 of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) Amounts authorized to be appropriated under this subsection 
shall be appropriated separately from amounts appropriated for the 
National Archives and Records Administration.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### O’REAR v. STATE.

No. 21939.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1942.

Reid & Reid, of .Abilene, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of having in possession intoxicating liquor, and, upon charges of three prior offenses of a like nature, assessed a penalty of eight months in jail.

The record is before us upon an agreed statement of facts, a careful checking of which discloses that the State did not at any time show that appellant was in possession of any beer, and, consequently, the elements of the offense charged are lacking.

It is also set out in their agreed statement of facts that the allegation of a prior conviction, “In Cause No. 10,631 was improperly used by the State as a prior conviction as a basis to enhance punishment and should not have been so used for *997the reason that the offense in Cause No. 10,631 * * * was committed prior to the offense for which defendant stood trial in this Cause No. 10,632.” We also understand that the plea of guilty in 10,631 was subsequent to the date of the offense as alleged in the case before us. That being true, it should not be utilized by the State upon another trial.

For the failure of the record to show the elements of the offense, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB review. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                     

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before December 29, 2000. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline. 

# COPIES:

Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer. 

# ADDRESSES:

Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7044. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     Notice to New SBA Borrowers.                 

*No.:*                     793.                 

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                 

*Description of Respondents:*                     Companies are required to keep records in order for SBA to determine the compliance status of the recipient.                 

*Annual Responses:*                     26,420.                 

*Annual Burden:*                     6,044.                 

Jacqueline White, 

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. 00-30414 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Case 4:22-cr-00293-O Document 36 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 46
Case 4:22-cr-00293-O Document 36 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 47
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Financial
Statements for the 3 months ended  March 31,  1998,  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such Financial Statements filed with form 10QSB and for
the 3 month period ended March 31, 1998.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       24,591
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             27,842
<PP&E>                                       57,661
<DEPRECIATION>                              (25,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              288,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       187,698
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     24,717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                288,017
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,127
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            206,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           28,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (233,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (233,709)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MYRA BROWN AND ALEXANDER

TAYLOR,

Plaintiffs,

v. No. 4:22-cv-908-P

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

ORDER

On October 18, 2022, the Court set a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction for 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 25, 2022,

in the Fourth Floor Courtroom of the Eldon B. Mahon United States 

Courthouse, located at 501 W. 10th Street, Fort Worth, Texas. The Court 

hereby instructs that each side will be allotted no more than two and a 

half hours to argue at the hearing. 

SO ORDERED on this 24th day of October 2022.

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00908-P Document 30 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 318
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable D. W. Stakes 

General Manager 

Taxas Prison Systesi 

Huntsville, Texas 

Dear E.r. Stalies: 

3 Texas pr 

We beg to acknowle 

ing for an opinion fro= this 

your latter askfro3 the Var 

us to either 

Coka 6: Iron 

e whether or not the 

the Texas I?rison System, 

tbi? Prison 3oard, has 

gotiato a sale or lease 

Artfcle 63360, Vcrnun*s Revised Civil Statutes, is 

as rollowe 

"'The Zoard shall have power to authorize the rmna@r to ml1 x%.4. ~LLspOse of all 

p-o~ucts oi' all farms ax: 52xlustries con- 
netted with the prison system and all 

personal aud wveable property, at 

such prices anil on such terms and render such rules as it may deem best and 

adopt; and it may lease any real estate 

for agricultural or grazing purposes or 

lease ether Sixed property and appurtenances belonging thereto upon such terms 

as it may deem advantageous to the interests of the prison system.* 

The language 'all personal and moveable property* 

in the above grant of power, is suSSicient, we think, to 

authorize the manager of the Texas Prison Gystem upon being 

authorized by the Board so to do, to 'sell and illspose* of 

the property desoribed by you. 

Of course, the action crf the Board will be governed by the consideration whether or not such sale and disposit&on OS the property will be advantageous to the Interests 

of the Prison System. 

Very truly yours 

ATTOlWB GENi3U.L OF TZCA.!.! 

// I 

be -9 Ooie S eer 1 

A5sisiant
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00326-L

§

AKEEM BALDWIN (4) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

AKEEM BALDWIN is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), and 18 U.S.C. § 2, namely, 

Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting. Sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☐ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☒ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 30th day of October, 2024.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 601 Filed 10/30/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1902
#### McDANIELS v. STATE.

No. 22709.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 12, 1944.

Aubrey Davee, of Brady, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with a violation of the liquor laws of McCulloch County, and was convicted by a jury and fined the sum of $150, hence this appeal.

The facts clearly show a sale in such county, and its dry status was properly established by the proof.

The county attorney correctly presented the information before the jury as directed in Art. 642(1), C.C.P.

No error being shown, the’ judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00104-Z-BR

§

EMILIO DIAZ (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

EMILIO DIAZ (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has appeared 

before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment. After cautioning 

and examining EMILIO DIAZ (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the 

guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and 

that EMILIO DIAZ (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and 252A(b)(2) - POSSESSION OF CHILD 

PORNOGRAPHY INVOLVING A PREPUBESCENT MINOR and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found 

guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: March 6, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00104-Z-BR Document 37 Filed 03/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 82
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 14 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

vs.

KERRY CHAPLIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-5075

(D.C. No. 97-CV-78-C)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY and HENRY Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Chaplin, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks to

appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate,

set aside or correct his sentence. He seeks a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). On appeal, he raises jurisdictional arguments, claims

rejected on direct appeal, see United States v. Edwards, 69 F.3d 419 (10th Cir.
- 2 -

1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 2497 (1996), and a claim of ineffective assistance

of counsel. The jurisdictional arguments are meritless, see, e.g., United States v.

Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir. 1995), 117 S. Ct. 136 (1996), the claims

raised on direct appeal may not be raised in a collateral attack pursuant to a §

2255 motion absent an intervening change in the law, United States v. Warner, 23

F.3d 287, 291 (10th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1152 (1996), and the

ineffective assistance claim based upon claims rejected on direct appeal

necessarily fails due to lack of prejudice. Because Mr. Chaplin has not made a

substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right, we DENY his

motion for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS the appeal.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-112502-00] 
          - RIN 1545-AY45 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed rulemaking relating to the treatment of a controlled foreign corporation's (CFC's) distributive share of partnership income. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Tuesday, December 5, 2000, at 10 a.m., is canceled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Treena Garrett of the Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and Strategic Planning), at 622-7180 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 20, 2000 (65 FR 56836), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for December 5, 2000, in the Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations. The deadline for outlines of oral comments and requests to speak expired on November 14, 2000.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of November 21, 2000, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for December 5, 2000, is canceled. 

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and Strategic Planning). 

[FR Doc. 00-30448 Filed 11-28-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EMANUAL DELEON FIELDS, §

 Petitioner, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-cv-2485-B (BT)

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID,

 Respondent.

§

§

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and

the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated

November 8, 2022, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of

the Court.

SO ORDERED this 25

th

 day of January, 2023.

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02485-B-BT Document 5 Filed 01/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 13