alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7583
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RANDY FALLS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-180-P, CA-96-300-3-P) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Falls, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Randy Falls seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Falls , Nos. CR-92-180-P; CA-96-300-3-P (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1160

To make permanent the temporary exemption from duty of the cost of

certain foreign repairs made to United States vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1993

Mr. TAUZIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To make permanent the temporary exemption from duty

of the cost of certain foreign repairs made to United

States vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXEMPTION.

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b)(2) of section 484E

5 of the Customs and Trade Act of 1990 (19 U.S.C. 1466

6 note) is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(2) any entry made on or after the date of en8 actment of this Act.’’

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) shall take effect January 1, 1993.
2

•HR 1160 IH

Æ
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CARBONE’S FINE FOOD AND WINES, §

LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-01184-E

§

CARBONE RESTAURANT LLC, §

CARBONE FINE FOOD LLC, §

THE MAJOR FOOD GROUP LLC, and §

MAJOR INTELLECTUAL LLC §

§

Defendants. §

FINAL JUDGMENT

On February 1, 2023, this Court issued an Order, (Doc. 29), (1) granting Parties’ Joint 

Motion Stipulation and Motion for Order Voluntarily Dismissing All Parties’ Claims Pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); (Doc. 28); (2) denying as moot Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction, (Doc. 11); and (3) denying as moot Defendants’ Motion to Extend Deadlines and for 

Expedited Discovery, (Doc. 17). Because all claims have been dismissed with prejudice, it is 

therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is hereby CLOSED. The Clerk 

of Court shall transmit to the parties a true copy of this Judgment. 

SO ORDERED: February 1, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-01184-E Document 30 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 733
# C_2016106EN.01001801.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2015 — Mohammad Zadeh Khorassani v Kathrin Pflanz

(Case C-678/15)

(2016/C 106/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mohammad Zadeh Khorassani

Applicant:

Defendant: Kathrin Pflanz

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the reception and transmission of an order which relates to a portfolio management (Article 4(1)(9) of the MiFID) an investment service within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 4(1)(2) (1) in conjunction with point 1 of Section A of Annex I to the MiFID?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ 2004 L 145, p. 1).

1

---
# Official Journal C 192/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.192.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 192 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5530 June 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.192.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 192

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5530 June 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2012/C 192/01 | Council Decision of 18 June 2012 appointing half of the members of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority and amending the Decision of 24 June 2010 | 1 |
| 2012/C 192/02 | Declaration by the Council | 3 |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 192/03 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| 2012/C 192/04 | Communication from the Commission on the body authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under Implementing Regulation (EU) No 481/2012 | 5 |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2012/C 192/05 | Executive summary EDPS Opinion of 7 March 2012 on the data protection reform package | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2012/C 192/01

Council Decision of 18 June 2012 appointing half of the members of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority and amending the Decision of 24 June 2010

1

2012/C 192/02

Declaration by the Council

3

European Commission

2012/C 192/03

Euro exchange rates

4

2012/C 192/04

Communication from the Commission on the body authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under Implementing Regulation (EU) No 481/2012

5

European Data Protection Supervisor

2012/C 192/05

Executive summary EDPS Opinion of 7 March 2012 on the data protection reform package

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 192/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6659 — Bain/Sumitomo/Jupiter Shop Channel JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 16 |
| 2012/C 192/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6621 — CNP Assurances/BNP Paribas/Immeuble Val-de-Marne) (1) | 18 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 192/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6659 — Bain/Sumitomo/Jupiter Shop Channel JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

16

2012/C 192/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6621 — CNP Assurances/BNP Paribas/Immeuble Val-de-Marne) (1)

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6413

TRAVIS J. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN MCFADEN,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (4:13-cv-00005-RMG)

Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Travis J. Williams seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge, as modified, and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

WASHI N GTO N , D .C. 20220 

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance Meeting 


1:30 p.m.-4:30p.m. June 12, 2013 


Main Treasury, Cash Room 


AGENDA 


1 :30 - 1:40 Opening Remarks - Chairman Duperreault and Director McRaith 

1:40- 1:45 Approval ofMinutes ofMarch FACI Meeting 

1:45- 2:15 Global Demographics Update- Robert A. Kerzner, President and CEO ofLIMRA 

2:15-2:45 Report of Subcommittee on Affordability and Accessibility ofInsurance -

Birny Birnbaum- Economist and Executive Director, Center for Economic Justice 

2:45-3:00 Report of Subcommittee on International Regulatory Balance - John DegnanSenior Advisor to the CEO, The Chubb Corporation 

3:00-3:15 	 Break 

3:15 - 3:45 	 Update from Superstorm Sandy Rebuilding Task Force - David Miller 

Associate Administrator, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration 

3:45 -4:1 5 Update on Reinsurance Captives - Michael Consedine, Commissioner, 

Pennsylvania Department ofInsurance 

4:15 - 4:25 	 International Update- Michael McRaith, Director, Federal Insurance Office. 

4:25 - 4:30 New Business and Set Next Meeting 

Adjourn
# CE2004070EN.01021401.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/214 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/214

---

(2004/C 70 E/229)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3084/03

by Koldo Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso (NI) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Sit-in of Basque political prisoners

Subject:

In the Basque Country, an unquestionable political conflict exists because the Basque people are being denied their democratic rights. The outlawing of ideas and political projects has brought only greater confrontation and more suffering.

The community of almost 700 hundred Basque political prisoners have been holding a sit-in, in the prisons of the Spanish Kingdom and the French Republic, since 27 September in defence of their rights. They have rejected visits from friends and relatives. As a matter of fact, journeys are so long that visits are impossible, and 13 people have already died on the way to or from the prisons.

The Spanish Government ignores every call to put an end to these sufferings, and the Spanish courts do not dare to insist on the democratic principle of the separation of powers.

On 4 September 2003, the European Parliament adopted a Report on the situation as regards fundamental rights in the EU (2002) (A5-0281/2003), where much emphasis is given to the mobilisation of European capacity to put an end to these intolerable abuses of prisoners.

Can the Commission table a proposal to the European Parliament so that this issue may be tackled as a matter of urgency?

Would the Commission support the involvement of Basque prisoners in a bid to find a solution to the ongoing conflict in the Basque Country?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(20 November 2003)

(20 November 2003)

The Commission takes the view that none of the powers conferred on it by the European Union and Community Treaties would allow it to take the action requested by the Honourable Member.

---
Exhibit 35.3












ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2015-CCRE22

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,
 National Association, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in
accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-14-00879-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2001-25797

Style: In re Tracy Gibbs

Date motion filed*: Nov. 4, 2014

Type of motion: Extension of Time to File Response

Party filing motion: Real Parties in Interest

Document to be filed: Response

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: 11/4/14

Number of previous extensions granted: 0

Date Requested: 10 days

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other Granted, in part

Response is due Monday, Nov. 10, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: November 4, 2014
### INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 23-0471 BRENDAZASTOUPIL

PETITIONER & APPELLANT V. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR &NDUSTRY, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, AND RYAN RESTAURANT CORPORATION

RESPONDANTS & APPELLEE'S GRANT OF MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FILING FEE



### Motion to proceed without payment ofthe filing fee in this matter is GRANTED. DATED August 25, 2023.

Clerk ofthe Supreme Court 08/25/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0471
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 305

Expressing the sense of Congress that the total amount appropriated for

fiscal year 1996 for defense programs should not exceed the amount

appropriated for those programs for fiscal year 1995 reduced by 10

percent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 3, 1994

Ms. FURSE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the total amount

appropriated for fiscal year 1996 for defense programs

should not exceed the amount appropriated for those

programs for fiscal year 1995 reduced by 10 percent.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the total

3 amount appropriated for national defense programs

4 (budget category 050) for fiscal year 1996 should not ex5 ceed $236,430,000,000, such amount being the amount

6 appropriated for those programs for fiscal year 1995 re7 duced by 10 percent.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1994-D,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         243,578
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  91,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               334,982
<PP&E>                                         2,883,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (939,211)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,279,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,924
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,275,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,279,729
<SALES>                                        277,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,964
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  590,295<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (349,730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (349,730)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (349,730)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### BIANCHI v. STATE.

No. 21538.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 2, 1941.

*591O. Shelley Evans, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of one hundred dollars.

The term of court at which appellant was convicted adjourned February 3, 1940. On the 19th of January, 1940, appellant executed an appeal bond which was approved by the sheriff on the same day and by the county judge on the 23rd of January, 1940. Stated in another way, appellant was released under an appeal bond during the term' of court at which he was convicted. He should have entered into a proper recognizance. Under the circumstances, this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commis■sion of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals .and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 426 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 426

        Designating October 24, 1995, as ``United Nations Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

Mr. Coyne introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
        Designating October 24, 1995, as ``United Nations Day''.

Whereas, in the midst of World War II, representatives of the nations of the 
        world, including the United States, gathered in San Francisco at the 
        United Nations Conference on International Organization to draft the 
        Charter of the United Nations;
Whereas the San Francisco Conference was attended by representatives of the 46 
        Member States, including the United States, that had signed the 
        Declaration by the United Nations on January 1, 1942;
Whereas an additional 5 Member States were admitted during the course of the San 
        Francisco conference to include 51 nations as original members of the 
        United Nations;
Whereas the Charter of the United Nations was signed on June 26, 1945, and 
        entered into force on October 24, 1945;
Whereas Article 1 of the United Nations Charter declares that the primary 
        objective of the United Nations is the maintenance of international 
        peace and security;
Whereas the United Nations is also dedicated to the development of friendly 
        relations among nations, based on equal rights and self-determination of 
        peoples;
Whereas the United Nations has provided a forum for the achievement of 
        international cooperation in solving international economic, social, 
        cultural, and humanitarian problems;
Whereas the United Nations has contributed to the peace and security of the 
        international community through diplomatic efforts and actions approved 
        by the United Nations Security Council; and
Whereas the United Nations and its agencies have played a central role in 
        addressing global issues of human rights, hunger, health, the 
        environment, and the needs of children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 24, 1995, is 
designated as ``United Nations Day'', and the President is authorized 
and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the 
United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities honoring the 50th anniversary of the United Nations.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000499 30-APR-2019 08:06 AM