alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1031 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1031

To provide for the improved enforcement of the employer sanctions law, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

Mr. Beilenson introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
         to the Committees on the Judiciary and Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the improved enforcement of the employer sanctions law, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SOCIAL SECURITY CARD.

    (a) Development of New Card.--Not later than January 1, 1996, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Social 
Security Administration and in cooperation with the Attorney General 
and the Secretary of Labor, shall consider and develop a counter-feit-
resistant social security card which contains fingerprint 
identification, barcode validation, a photograph, or some other 
identifiable feature.
    (b) Work Authorization Document.--Not later than January 1, 1996, 
the Attorney General shall designate the social security card as the 
single acceptable work authorization document under the Immigration 
Reform and Control Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.3(E)

 

[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

January 9, 2014

 

Marina Biotech, Inc.

3830 Monte Villa Parkway

Bothell, Washington, 98021

Attn: Michael French, Chief executive Officer

 

Re:                             Agreement re Option Compound and miR-34 Sequences

 

Dear Michael:

 

As you know, Mirna Therapeutics, Inc. (“MirnaRx”) and Marina Biotech, Inc. (“Marina Bio”) have entered into an amendment, effective as December 27, 2013, to that certain license agreement dated December 22, 2011 (the “License Agreement”, and such amendment the “Amendment”).  This letter agreement is that certain Amendment Side Letter referred to in the Amendment, and it sets forth the RNA oligonucleotide sequences of the Option Compounds that the Parties are agreeing to designate as Selected MirnaRx Compounds pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.  Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment Side Letter shall have the meaning given to those terms in the License Agreement.

 

The Parties hereby agree that the list of RNA oligonucleotide sequences attached as the Appendix of this Amendment Side Letter comprises sequences of miR-34, let-7, miR-215, [***] as well as the sequences of two Option Compounds [***] under the terms of the License Agreement.  The Parties further agree that such sequences are the highly confidential information of MirnaRx, and Marina Bio shall comply with the confidentiality obligations set forth in the License Agreement with respect thereto, and shall not disclose such sequences to any third party or use them for any purpose outside of the License Agreement.

 

	
AGREED TO BY:
    	
Mirna   Therapeutics, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/   Paul Lammers
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Paul   Lammers, M,D., M.Sc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Marina   Biotech, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/   Michael French
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Michael   French
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    


 











 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

APPENDIX

 

miR-34 Sequence:

[***]

 

let-7 Sequence

[***]

 

miR-215 Sequence

[***]

 

[***]

 

[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
v

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

DAVIN SETH WATERS,

Petitioner

2:22-CY-194-Z-BP.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court are the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge to dismiss the 28 U.S.C. S 2255 Motion to Vacate filed by Petitioner ("FCR").

ECF No. 14. Objections to the FCR have been filed. ECF No. 15. After making an independent

review of the pleadings, files, records, and objections in this case, the Court concludes that the

FCR of the Magistrate Judge are correct. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions,

and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED and the case is DISMISSED.

Additionally, the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability ("COA").r A district court

may deny a COA sua sponte and without requiring funher briefing or argument. See Alexander v.

Johnson,2l I F.3d 895, 898 (5th Cir. 2000). Considering the record in this case and pursuant to

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule I l(a) of the Rules Governing $$ 2254 ail2255

proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. $ 2253(c), and ADOPTING and INCORPORATING the Magistrate

Judge's FCR, the Court finds that Petitioner has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find

I Because the Motion to Vacate is governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalry Act, codified as amended

at 28 U.S.C. $ 2253, a COA is a "jurisdictional prerequisite" before an appeal may proceed. Miller-El v. Coclcrell,537

U.5.322,336 (2003) (citing 28 U.S.C. $ 2253(c)(l)); Hallmark v. Johnson, I l8 F.3d 1073, 1076 (5th Cir. 1997)

(noting $S 2254 and2255 actions require a COA).

Case 2:22-cv-00194-Z-BR Document 16 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 139
"it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right" or

"debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

November /7,zozl

W J. KACSMARYK

I.INITED STATES DISTRICT ruDGE

2

Case 2:22-cv-00194-Z-BR Document 16 Filed 11/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 140
# Official Journal L 70/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 70 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6015 March 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 70

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6015 March 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Directive (EU) 2017/433 of 7 March 2017 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Directive (EU) 2017/433 of 7 March 2017 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order Lansing, Michigan 

### October 29, 2007

134460

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,

v ROBERT E. BUTCHER, Respondent-Appellant,

________________ _______________ __________/ SC: 134460 ADB: 04-21-GA Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 29, 2007 Clerk
OCT 2 2 2012 

James Uoldstene 

Executive Officer
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 25, 2015, by and amongDEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIAITON, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, DBWF 2015-LCM (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### ROBERTS v. STATE.

No. 21213.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

C. O. McMillan and W. J. Oxford, Jr., •both of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment. assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

There are certain exceptions to the court’s charge, but we are unable to appraise them in the absence of a statement of facts.

Nothing being presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.
#### Cleo F. BOMAR, Appellant v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22024.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1942.

Pichinson & Alsup, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to commit robbery, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his personal affidavit advising this court that he does not desire to further prosecute his appeal.

At appellant’s request the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 10.4.1

 

Execution Version

 

	
 
    	

    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
19411 Atrium Place   Suite 170, Houston, TX 77084
    


 

November 1, 2013

 

Lewis L. Bird, III

 

Dear Lee,

 

Garden Ridge has reviewed its vacation policy and as a result of this review is eliminating the vacation policy in favor of a Paid Time Off (PTO) Policy, which addresses both vacation and other personal time off. In order to conform your Employment Agreement to the new policy, Garden Ridge requests your consent to the following amendments to your Employment Agreement:

 

Section 2.6 (Vacation) is amended to read in its entirety: During the Employment Period, the Executive shall be entitled to two hundred (200) hours of paid time off (PTO) per calendar year, prorated for partial years in accordance with the terms of the Company’s PTO Policy.

 

Section 3.1 (Termination of Employment) is amended so as (a) to change the reference in the first sentence from “15 days” to “30 days” in both instances where “15 days” appears in that sentence, and (b) to delete clause (iii) of the second sentence of the section.

 

Please evidence your agreement to the foregoing changes by executing and returning to me a copy of this letter.

 

	
 
    	
Very truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
GARDEN RIDGE   CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Valerie Davisson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Valerie Davisson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief People Officer
    


 

Accepted and Agreed to as an amendment to the Employment Agreement between Garden Ridge Corporation and the undersigned to be effective as of the date of this letter:

 

 

	
/s/ Lewis L. Bird, III
    	
 
    
	
Lewis L. Bird, III
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1006

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to expand the requirement

that legislation be accompanied by cost estimates of its impact on State

and local governments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. SHAYS (for himself, Mr. MFUME, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr.

CLINGER, Mr. PETRI, Mr. GOODLING, Mrs. VUCANOVICH, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. PAXON, Mr. FAWELL, and Mr.

MCHUGH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to expand

the requirement that legislation be accompanied by cost

estimates of its impact on State and local governments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ANALYSIS BY CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET

4 OFFICE.

5 Section 403(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of

6 1974 is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘or conference report’’ before

8 ‘‘, and submit’’;
2

•HR 1006 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘if timely submitted to such

2 committee before such report is filed’’ and inserting

3 ‘‘or the joint explanatory statement accompanying

4 such conference report’’; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new sen6 tence: ‘‘It shall not be in order in the House of Rep7 resentatives or the Senate to consider any significant

8 bill or resolution, or any conference report on a sig9 nificant bill or resolution, if the report accompanying

10 the bill or resolution or the joint explanatory state11 ment accompanying the conference report does not

12 comply with the preceding sentence.’’.

13 SEC. 2. RECONCILIATION INSTRUCTIONS.

14 Section 310(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of

15 1974 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph

16 (3), by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; or’’ at the end

17 of paragraph (4), and by inserting after paragraph (4) the

18 following:

19 ‘‘(5) direct any committee receiving an instruc20 tion under paragraph (1) or (2) to include the esti21 mate required by section 403(a) with the reconcili22 ation legislation that carries out such instruction.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.03
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Financial and Operating Officer and principal
financial officer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The
Millburn World Resource Trust (the "Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Trust.


/s/ Gregg Buckbinder
 -------------------------
 Gregg Buckbinder
 Chief Financial and Operating Officer
 November 11, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth M. Roessler, President and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Holding Company and BWAY
Corporation (the Companies) and Kevin C. Kern, Vice-President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Companies for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 14, 2008



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth M. Roessler                                     
|Kenneth M. Roessler                                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer                       
|                                                            
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                                           
|Kevin C. Kern                                               
|Vice-President of Administration and Chief Financial
Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ERIC JACKSON ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v. No. 4:22-cv-825-P

ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY

OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction 

(ECF No. 4) and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as Moot (ECF No. 69). 

Having considered the Motions and related docket entries, the Court 

concludes that supplemental briefing is warranted as to the following:

1. Whether the Fifth Circuit’s holding in U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 

v. Biden, No. 22-10077, 2023 WL 4362355 (5th Cir. July 6, 

2023) provides support for Plaintiffs or Defendants?

2. Whether Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction is moot 

due to the rescission of Defendants’ COVID-19 vaccination 

policy?

3. Whether the case is moot if Plaintiffs seek relief beyond 

enjoining Defendants’ COVID-19 vaccination policy?

The Court therefore ORDERS each Party to file a supplemental brief 

addressing the abovementioned questions by July 13, 2023. 

SO ORDERED on this 11th day of July 2023.

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 92 Filed 07/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1959
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70829-70830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL-6907-4]


Georgia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to EPA for Final authorization of the 
changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation 
and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final authorization to 
Georgia. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is authorizing the changes by an immediate final rule. 
EPA did not make a proposal prior to the immediate final rule because 
we believe this action is not controversial and do not expect comments 
that oppose it. We have explained the reasons for this authorization in 
the preamble to the immediate final rule. Unless we get written 
comments which oppose this authorization during the comment period, the 
immediate final rule will become effective on the date it establishes, 
and we will not take further action on this proposal. If we get 
comments that oppose this action, we will withdraw the immediate final 
rule and it will not take effect. We will then respond to public 
comments in a later final rule based on this proposal. You may not have 
another opportunity for comment. If you want to comment on this action, 
you must do so at this time.

DATES: Send your written comments by December 28, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Narindar Kumar, Chief, RCRA 
Programs Branch, Waste Management Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth 
Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; (404) 562-8440. You can 
examine copies of the materials submitted by Georgia during normal 
business hours at the following locations: EPA Region 4 Library, The 
Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61

[[Page 70830]]

Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960, Phone number: (404) 
562-8190, Kathy Piselli, Librarian; or The Georgia Department of 
Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division, 205 Butler Street, 
Suite 1154, East, Atlanta Georgia 30334-4910, Phone number: 404-656-
7802.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Narindar Kumar, Chief, RCRA Programs 
Branch, Waste Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; (404) 562-8440.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section 
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: October 20, 2000.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 00-30007 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P