confidential







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Berkeley Point Capital LLC



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s
Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB, that Berkeley Point Capital
LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2018, except for Items 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(dX4Xxv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed
by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Refer to Appendix A of Management’s Assessment of
Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB for the asset backed transactions covered
by this platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based
on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less
than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed
those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by Regulation AB Compliance and Disclosure
Interpretations of the Division of Corporation Finance, Section 200.06, “Vendors Engaged by Servicers” (C&DI 200.06).
	Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during
the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior
to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period
covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. Although the Company is responsible for assessing
compliance with Items 1122(dX4Xiii), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiv) of Regulation AB, there
were no servicing activities performed by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2018 that required these servicing criteria
to be complied with. We believe that the







A member firm of Emst&Young Global Limited







confidential


confidential






evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.



Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s
compliance with the servicing criteria.



As described in management’s assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(v),
1122(dX2)(vi) and 1122(dX2)(vii), the Company has engaged a vendor to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria.
The Company has determined that this vendor is not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation
AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable
to this vendor as permitted by C&DI 200.06. As permitted by C&DI 200.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies
and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects
with servicing criteria applicable to this vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements
to apply C&DI 200.06 for the vendor and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with
respect to the Company’s eligibility to apply C&DI 200.06.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB, including servicing
criteria 1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(dX2Xvi) and 1122(dX2)(vii) for which compliance is determined based on C&DI 200.06 as described
above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions platform, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.









February 22, 2019





























2

A member firm of Emst&Young Global Limited



confidential