alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C29 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1213

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include veterans participating

in Operation Desert Storm and other veterans as eligible for veterans’

mortgage bond financing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1993

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means.

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include

veterans participating in Operation Desert Storm and

other veterans as eligible for veterans’ mortgage bond

financing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPERATION DESERT STORM VETERANS ETC.,

4 ELIGIBLE FOR VETERANS’ MORTGAGE BOND

5 FINANCING.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

7 143(l)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining

8 qualified veteran) is amended by striking ‘‘before January
2

•HR 1213 IH

1 1, 1977’’ and inserting ‘‘on or before the date designated

2 by the President for purposes of section 112 as the date

3 of the termination of combatant activities in the Persian

4 Gulf region.’’

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to financing provided after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1030 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1030

To provide for the separate administration of the Border Patrol and the 
                Immigration and Naturalization Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

Mr. Beilenson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the separate administration of the Border Patrol and the 
                Immigration and Naturalization Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATION OF THE BORDER PATROL.

    Effective October 1, 1993, the border patrol of the Immigration and 
Naturalization Service shall be administered through the Department of 
Justice under the Attorney General and shall not be part of, or 
administered through, the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

                                 <all>
```
SCWC-14-0001139

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

 

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ALFRED W.K. COMBES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0001139; CR. NO. 12-1-1895)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Alfred

W.K. Combes’s application for writ of certiorari, it appears that

Combes’s application was due on January 26, 2017, which was 30

days after the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ December 27, 2016

judgment. Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-59(c) (Supp.

2014); Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule

40.1(a)(1)(2016).

Combes’s application was filed on January 27, 2017. The

application is untimely and thus, this court lacks appellate

jurisdiction. Therefore,

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0001139

03-FEB-2017

09:57 AM
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of

certiorari is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 3, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Exhibit 4.9


 










		



 


 


 


 





Notice to U.S. Investors


 


The merger described herein relates
to the securities of two foreign companies. The merger in which Telecom Italia Media S.p.A. ordinary shares and savings shares
will be converted into Telecom Italia S.p.A. ordinary shares and saving shares, respectively, is subject to disclosure and procedural
requirements of a foreign country that are different from those of the United States. Financial statements included in the document,
if any, have been prepared in accordance with foreign accounting standards that may not be comparable to the financial statements
of United States companies. 


 


It may be difficult for you to enforce
your rights and any claim you may have arising under the federal securities laws, since Telecom Italia S.p.A. and Telecom Italia
Media S.p.A. are located in Italy, and some or all of their officers and directors may be residents of Italy or other foreign
countries. You may not be able to sue a foreign company or its officers or directors in a foreign court for violations of the
U.S. securities laws. It may be difficult to compel a foreign company and its affiliates to subject themselves to a U.S. court’s
judgement. 


 


You should be aware that Telecom
Italia S.p.A. may purchase securities of Telecom Italia Media S.p.A. otherwise than under the merger offer, such as in open market
or privately negotiated purchases.


 


***


 


PRESS RELEASE


 


MERGER
OF TELECOM ITALIA MEDIA S.P.A. INTO TELECOM ITALIA S.P.A.


REGISTRATION
OF THE DEED OF MERGER


 


Milan, 29 September 2015


 


Following the press release of September
25, 2015, Telecom Italia S.p.A. and Telecom Italia Media S.p.A. announce that the registrations of the deed of merger signed on
September 25, 2015 have been executed in the Companies Registers of Milan and Rome, respectively on September 29 and September
28, 2015.


 


The merger will be effective as per the end
(11:59 pm) of the day of 30 September 2015.


 


	Telecom Italia

        Press Office

        +39 06 3688 2610

        www.telecomitalia.com/media

         

        Telecom Italia

        Investor Relations

        +39 02 8595 4131

        www.telecomitalia.com/investorrelations

         





 


 


 





Telecom Italia S.p.A. – Registered
office: Via G. Negri 1, 20123 Milan Tax-code/VAT no. and enrolment in the Milan Business Register: 00488410010 Share capital €
10.723.844.367,85 fully paid up certified e-mail address [casella PEC]: telecomitalia@pec.telecomitalia.it
7KH +RQRUDEOH *HRUJH &DUDP 6WHH

IRU WKH (DVWHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 0LFKLJDQ VLWWL



5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

	


	





1,7(' 	7$7(6 2) 0(5,&$

	






$0(6 ,7&+(// /,1*$1

	



 !"#
$%"&	"

 "#'" $(%'" %)"$$

,,,-.$&+ 

 +*&/0

()%&&$&%&/

2 /
	$&3

(%'" %)"*&






	  %55%  6% ) 	7
	8 $9%$$''%)# 		
	


1 
 

#""$+$$'' 
(9%&''(3((	7
	#""$+$$'' $":0$%)# 		
	

(		;#""$+$$'' 







88 	 (%'" %)" *&+  ($&$"

'"#&%'" %)")* "<'&)%'%$"#"#='$"$"%"&" &*)"%$%$#%'>'$'9* '*$""
$%"&	""'	$"$)%$+ 8*%&%$' ?
		8@ A 1B1?>@?1@ =#%)#='&$&$"<'>'$'9"> &*)&"9'%C%"#&$&$"D''''&!!*$%"%$$&%  !''0 =*' "%$+* '' ))"%$D2)*'"#&$&$" +* 0> " &) ' +*$'$&" '&"#+*$'  %"=	

"#%$&%$+"#&%'" %)"

)* " "#" &$&$" &%& $" '''' "# +*$' '0  ))"%$

$0($&$"='%$&%)"&$"# )*$"'

 >%$+  )$9%)"& $ %$ ''''%$   %  ! %$9%"%$
	A11?+@?@*$"$+&"#"($&$")$9%)"&$''''&''> +1+*+'#"+*$ $   >*" *0  E  *$" = +&($&$")$9%)"&$''''&	 '-,-, %$  >*" *0  E  *$" *  +& ($&$" )$9%)"& $ ''''&  && * $ ! %)$ !'%'"$ >*"*0E*$"# '*+#")$%')"%$$&&%''"# %* '*$""
	A -F*$" %9 '*+#" )$%')"%$"#%'" $&!!*$%"%$* '*$""
	A-F$	"!> ($&$"$" &+*%"0"*$"'$=$&# ($&$"=''$"$)&$()!> -" 1G !$"#' %! %'$!$" =& >0 "#  0 ' '* 9%'& '='%$&HG,,,,,$&=' & &"0H1,,,,')%''''!$"
 

6HH 866*  .D

($&$"<'''' "%$ 

'#*	 &*)&#%'>'$

'%C* '*$""
		8A1B1 "%$$" "/D
"#&$&$"$&%  !''0 =*' "$&&%&$"*$=*0&%')# + '*)# %  !'   !!*$%"%$ &&" !%$& >9 " 9 D A1B1?>@?1@%'# >)*'C)#$+   *'& *"!>%' =$'#'"+$ ")'#

 &%'" %)" )* "<' )"* %$&

%)"%$"#	$"$)%$+8*%&D) 0 $*'D'"$& &=#)$)*'%$'  9%=&&$9G-&,,-?"#% G,1&E1EG?"#$" )$"'" "# &%'" %)" I*&+<' %  !'"=$'#'>"=$E$&''''&%9*$& %'$&'' "&!!*$%"%$"# '%&$) $ *0  E  #($&$"<' #! =  '" &%$!!*$%"%$ =' *$& "# *+#)$)&& $  "#" $$ ''''&= $0')%9*

# 
$%"& 	""' 	$"$)%$

)!!$" 0'"' "#D 9$"'* ")$'%& %$0%$+
		8A+%9$)'/


$&  '*>')"%$ ?>@?1@ D=))"%$D ' &" !%$& )% )*!'"$)'  9%&'    99$"'* *$&%$
G 
 

"#$*!> $&"0%  !'"#!*$"$&"0!!*$%"%$ "# )"%$ $& )% )*!'"$)'  "#''''%$$&)"**'"#$"* "#&$&$"<') %!%$ #%'" 0 ?  %  )$9%)"%$'   $''%$99%$+%  !'@$&"#C"$""=#%)#''''%$=' '" %)"&>0)=""#"=# "#>'$'9%' &" !%$& *$&  '*>')"%$' ?@?@ ?@?F@'*>')"%$?>@?1@%'$"%)>


		8 A 1B1 )!!$" ?$ ,@  #%' )* " #' 9%*'0 %&  %"  &%$+ " "#  &)''  "A1B1?>@?1@
		8A1B1?>@?@?9,@ *%$+"#"$&%&$"''''%  !'D'0D ))"%$* ''=# %"=''#=$"#""#$*'&$"#+*$' !#%'))"%$  )%9&'&$'* ''

-,--G:31--"

JJ G ?"#%  $  G@  D<	0< !$' <	
83;3    " "# C)*'%$  " $"   )!"%$+"#%$+'<D   ?K*"%$+    !" #$#1?@@

 &$&$"%$+$''''&"#% "$%  !'&* %$+

"# %!%"& "#  !$"#  %&   % F E "# *+#*0E$&)"*0'&'%C"#'%  !'"=$'#'   "# * '  +$ "%$+ )'#  $  "#=$'= $"%K*' "# ')%9*($&$"&%&$"))""#%  !''0 "#* '!''%$++*$))"%$>*" "#)!"%$+* ')$9 "%$+*'&*"!>%'%$")* $)0>0*'%$+%  !''> " %$+"'
"%'$!!$""#"($&$"%$"$&&"'"#%  !' "#%$$)$"* ''%$$)%$+!9*"'"" $& 0%$+   #%' !"# <'  ') %"%$ & *+'  


#E1&11G?"#% @?0%$+%" !$%$+" ! A1B1?>@?1@'$"$) &*)"%$   ''''%$  %  !' D'0   ' "   ) "%$D$&% !%$+&$%'$"$) &*)"%$=# $ ''''& %  ! ' )"    $ *$%& &>"@($&$" &%& $" '''' "# "#% "$ %  !' '0  * ''  ))"%$  )) &%$+0 "# &)%'%$ >0 "#

 &%'" %)")* ""&$0($&$"
		8A1B1?>@?1@%'
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Table 4.1 FY 2014 Treasury Conressional Justification

Major IT FY 2011 FY 2012 % Change FY 2013 % Change FY 2014 % Change

Investments Actual Actual from FY 11 Plan from FY 12 Request from FY 12

to FY 12 to FY 13 to FY 14 

0 0 0 0

Non-Major IT FY 2011 FY 2012 % Change FY 2013 % Change FY 2014 % Change

Investments Actual Actual from FY 11 Plan from FY 12 Request from FY 12

to FY 12 to FY 13 to FY 14 

0 0 --- 0 --- 4,146.00 100%

 DM&E:

015-05-1881-0 / DO Comm. Dev. Fin. 

Institutions Fund Program Account 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,146.00 100.00%

332 20 -93.98% 30 50.00% 0 -100.00%

 O&M:

015-05-1881-0 / DO Comm. Dev. Fin. 

Institutions Fund Program Account 332 20 -93.98% 30 50.00% 0 -100.00%

 O&M:

015-05-1881-0 / DO Comm. Dev. Fin. 

Institutions Fund Program Account 100 98 -2.00% 116 18.37% 121 23.47%

896 564 -37.05% 1,275.00 126.06% 875 55.14%

 O&M:

015-05-1881 / Community Development 

Financial Institutions Fund Program Account 646 510 -21.05% 1,169.00 129.22% 765 50.00%

 O&M:

015-05-0142 / State Small Business Credit 

Initiative 250 54 -78.40% 106 96.30% 110 103.70%

0 1,407.00 --- 911 -35.25% 1,048.00 -25.52%

 O&M:

015-05-1881 / Community Development 

Financial Institutions Fund Program Account 0 1,407.00 0.00% 911 -35.25% 1,048.00 -25.52%

333 313 -6.01% 155 -50.48% 0 -100.00%

 O&M:

015-05-1881-0 / DO Comm. Dev. Fin. 

Institutions Fund Program Account 333 313 -6.01% 155 -50.48% 0 -100.00%

2,639.00 2,745.00 4.02% 1,691.00 -38.40% 1,774.00 -35.37%

 O&M:

015-05-1881 / DO Comm. Dev. Fin. 

Institutions Fund Program Account 2,639.00 2,745.00 4.02% 1,691.00 -38.40% 1,774.00 -35.37%

4,300.00 5,147.00 4,178.00 7,964.00 55%

0 0 0 4,146.00 100%

4,300.00 5,147.00 4,178.00 3,818.00 -26%

Major Non-IT FY 2011 FY 2012 % Change FY 2013 % Change FY 2014 % Change

Investments Actual Actual from FY 11 Enacted from FY 12 Request from FY 13

to FY 12 to FY 13 to FY 14 

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

4,300.00 5,147.00 4,178.00 7,964.00

 Agency Funding

Information Technology

Funding Source 

Subtotal of All Major ITInvestments

Funding Source 

Award Management Information System

23.47%

 Agency Funding

CDFI LAN

 Agency Funding

Community Development Financial

100 98

Community Investment Impact System

 Agency Funding

18.37% 121

Subtotal - IT O&M

IT Program Management Support

 Agency Funding

IT Security

 Agency Funding

Legacy Mission Systems

 Agency Funding

Subtotal of All Non-Major ITInvestments

Subtotal - IT DM&E

Institutions Fund Public Website -2.00% 116

Non-IT

Funding Source 

Subtotal - Non-IT DM&E

Total for Major and Non-Major

IT Investments 4,300.00 5,147.00 4,178.00

Subtotal - Non-IT O&M

Total for Major Non-IT Investments

Total Capital Investments 

7,964.00
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7583

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RANDY FALLS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-180-P, CA-96-300-3-P)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Falls, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Randy Falls seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Falls, Nos. CR-92-180-P; CA-96-300-3-P

(W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-14267

________________________

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01169-TJC-PDB

SCOTT MONACO, 

BRIAN NICHOLSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE,

A Florida municipality,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(November 23, 2016)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and 

ROSENBERG,* District Judge.

__________ 

*Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg, United States District Judge for the Southern District of 

Florida, sitting by designation

Case: 15-14267 Date Filed: 11/23/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM: 

We have had the benefit of oral argument, and have carefully reviewed the 

briefs of the parties and relevant parts of the summary judgment record. We 

conclude that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed on the basis of 

the excellent and comprehensive opinion of the district court rendered on 

September 30, 2014. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-14267 Date Filed: 11/23/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Officer's Certificate





Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the
transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, as Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino, a Senior Managing Director of Berkeley
Point Capital LLC, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his
capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the "Reporting
Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
1st day of March, 2018.







Berkeley Point Capital LLC



/s/ Ronald Steffenino

Ronald Steffenino

Senior Managing Director,

Servicing and Asset Management
















Schedule I



Multifamily Pass-Through Certificates, Berkeley Point Capital LLC as Sub-Servicer:



Series 2009-K4

Series 2010-K5

Series 2011-K10

Series 2011-K12

Series 2012-K709

Series 2013-K24

Series 2013-KF02

Series 2014-K503

Series 2014-KF06

Series 2015-KF07

Series 2015-KF08

Series 2015-KF10

Series 2015-KF12

Series 2016-KF13

Series 2016-KF16

Series 2016-KSW1

Series 2016-KF18

Series 2016-KF26

Series 2017-K71

Series 2017-K724

Series 2017-K725

Series 2017-K726

Series 2017-K727

Series 2017-K728

Series 2017-KF29

Series 2017-KF33

Series 2017-KF35

Series 2017-KF38

Series 2017-KSW2

Series 2017-KSW3














Schedule I continued





Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC as
Primary Servicer:



COMM 2014-CCRE 17 Mortgage Trust

COMM 2014-CCRE19 Mortgage Trust

Series 2014-GC24

COMM 2014-UBS4 Mortgage Trust

2015-CCRE23

COMM 2015 CCRE27 Mortgage Trust

Series 2015-GC30

2015-GS1

GSCCRE Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-HULA

COMM 2015-LC19 Mortgage Trust

Series 2015-LC21

CFCRE 2016-C3 Mortgage Trust

CFCRE 2016-C7

CCRESG Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-HEAT

CCUBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C1

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-C4

UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-05
United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

Dallas Division

United States of America, §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-CR-390-S-1

§

Joseph Garza, §

 Defendant §

Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel

The Defendant, Joseph Garza, by and through his undersigned attorney, 

Jason D. Hawkins, requests that the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the 

Northern District of Texas be allowed to withdraw from the case and that new 

counsel be appointed. The case was previously assigned to Assistant Federal 

Public Defender Erin Brennan, but she has since left the office to enter private 

practice. 

Respectfully submitted this 20th day of December 2022.

Jason D. Hawkins

Federal Public Defender

/s/ Jason D. Hawkins

____________________________

Jason D. Hawkins

Federal Public Defender

Federal Public Defenders Office

525 Griffin Street, Suite 629

Dallas, Texas 75202

214.767.2746

214.767.2886 facsimile

Texas Bar No. 00795763

Jason_Hawkins@fd.org

Case 3:22-cr-00390-S Document 50 Filed 12/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 147
Certificate of Conference

I, Jason D. Hawkins, hereby certify that on December 19, 2022, I did confer 

by telephone with Renee Hunter, the Assistant United States Attorney assigned to 

this matter, and she is unopposed to the requested relief.

/s/ Jason D. Hawkins

____________________________

Jason D. Hawkins

Federal Public Defender

Certificate of Service

I, Jason D. Hawkins, hereby certify that on the 20th day of December 2022, 

a copy of the foregoing motion was delivered via ECF to the United States 

Attorney’s Office, attention Renee Hunter.

/s/ Jason D. Hawkins

____________________________

Jason D. Hawkins

Federal Public Defender

Case 3:22-cr-00390-S Document 50 Filed 12/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 148
#### ANDRUS et al. v. REMMERT et al.

No. 7509.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 19, 1941.

For prior opinion see 146 S.W.2d 728, reversing judgment Tex.Civ.App., 120 S.W. 2d 272.

Robert L. Sonfield, Miles Strickland, and W. P. Neblett, all of Houston, for appellants.

Searcy & Hodde, of Brenham, for Rem-mert.

C. D. Duncan, of Bellville, and K. W. Gilmore, of Houston, for Humble Oil Co.

On Motion for Rehearing.

CRITZ, Justice.

This cause is before us on motion for rehearing filed herein by William R. Rem-mert and Humble Oil & Refining Company.

In our original opinion we reversed the judgments of the Court of Civil Appeals and district court, and remanded this cause to the district court with instructions to partition the land indicated upon the fol*585lowing plat outside of the land enclosed within the letters “E, F, G, H.”

> 

A re-examination of this record discloses that we were in error in describing the land which ought to be partitioned. For the purposes of this opinion on rehearing we make the following plat:

> 

As shown by our original opinion, a tract of land 160 ft. by 419 ft. was set apart as a cemetery. We held, however, that all of such tract, except that part enclosed within the letters “E, F, G, H” on the first plat, supra, had been abandoned as such, and adjudged that all of such original tract should be partitioned, except the part still used as a cemetery. On further investigation of this record we find that the land included within the letters “I, J, D, A,” as shown by the second map, supra, was not included in this suit as finally submitted in the district court. We also find that we made a slight mistake in our original plat as to the land actually occupied by the cemetery.

It is ordered that our original judgment herein be set aside and judgment be now entered as follows: The judgments of the Court of Civil Appeals and district court are both reversed, and this cause is remanded to the district court with instructions to partition the two tracts of land included within the letters-“B, F, E, I” and “G, C, J, H,” respectively. We leave the question as to how such partition shall be effected to be determined by the district court. To the extent above indicated the motion for rehearing filed herein by William R. Remmert and Humble Oil & Refining Company is granted; otherwise such motion is overruled.