alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 115/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 115 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5810 April 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 115

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5810 April 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 115/01 | Communication from the Commission on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins: updated list of designated authorities | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 115/01

Communication from the Commission on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins: updated list of designated authorities

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 115/02 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2015/C 115/03 | Commission Decision of 8 April 2015 amending the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 115/02

Euro exchange rates

3

2015/C 115/03

Commission Decision of 8 April 2015 amending the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 115/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7512 — ARDIAN/Abertis/Tunels) (
  1
  ) | 19 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 115/05 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 20 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 115/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7512 — ARDIAN/Abertis/Tunels) (
  1
  )

1

19

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 115/05

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7345

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LOFTON HOWARD LAMBERT, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-5) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lofton Howard Lambert, III, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald,Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lofton Howard Lambert, III, appeals the district court’s orderdenying his motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lambert , No. CA-93-5 (W.D. Va. Aug. 27, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 85

    Expressing the disfavor of the Congress regarding the proposed 
  agreement for cooperation between the United States and the Russian 
         Federation pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2010

     Mr. Markey of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. Fortenberry) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the disfavor of the Congress regarding the proposed 
  agreement for cooperation between the United States and the Russian 
         Federation pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
favor the proposed agreement for cooperation between the United States 
and the Russian Federation pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 
transmitted to the Congress by the President on May 10, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7162 

GLEN WAYNE STAPLETON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District

Judge. (CA-03-406-7-jpj)

Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004

Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glen Wayne Stapleton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Glen Wayne Stapleton seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing without prejudice his motion for relief from

judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days

after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order,

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

February 3, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on July 6, 2004.*

Because Stapleton failed to file a timely notice of appeal, or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

the appeal. We further deny Stapleton’s motion for a certificate

of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
- 3 -

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PACE Health Management Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Pappajohn, Director and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




                                                           /s/ John Pappajohn
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         John Pappajohn
                                                         Director and Acting CEO
                                                         August 12, 2002







                                       10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BRAYLON RAY COULTER,

#20200383,

Plaintiff,

VS.

NFN GILPIN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-2212-G-BH

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,

in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted

as the Findings and Conclusions of the court. The case will be dismissed by separate

judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders.

SO ORDERED.

February 7, 2023.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-02212-G-BH Document 10 Filed 02/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 64
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DONALD RAY LONG,

Plaintiff,

VS.

PROCOLLECT, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-2101-G-BH

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,

in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted

as the Findings and Conclusions of the court. The case will be dismissed by separate

judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders.

SO ORDERED.

December 21, 2022.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-02101-G-BH Document 9 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30
**The Agenda**

**Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention**

**Quarterly Meeting**

**Wednesday, April 9, 2014**

**U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs**

**810 Seventh Street, NW, 3rd Floor Conference Center, Washington, DC 20531**

****

**11:00-11:15 am 	Welcome, Opening Remarks, and Introductions**

*Karol Mason, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs (OJP), U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)*****

*Tony West, Associate Attorney General, DOJ*

**

*Robert Listenbee, Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and*

*Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), DOJ, Vice Chair, Coordinating Council*

**11:15-11:55 am	The Supportive School Discipline Initiative and Related Efforts**

***2011-12**Civil Rights Data Collection    (15 minutes)***

*****Catherine Lhamon,****Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education (ED)*

*Marlyn Tillman, Co-chair, Gwinnett Parent Coalition to Dismantle the School to Prison Pipeline (Gwinnett SToPP) & School to Prison Pipeline Director, American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia (ACLU-GA)*

***Discipline Disparities**Research to Practice Collaborative    (15 minutes)***

*Russell Skiba, Director, Discipline Disparities Research to Practice Collaborative, the Equity Project, Indiana University*

*James Bell, Founder and Executive Director, W. Haywood Burns Institute*

***National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges***

***School Pathways Project    (10 minutes)***

*******Chandlee Johnson Kuhn, Chief Judge, Family Court of the State of Delaware*

**11:55 am-12:25 pm	Council Member Discussion**

**12:25-12:35 pm	Agency and Practitioner Announcements**

****

**12:35 pm		Meeting Adjournment**

*Robert Listenbee, Administrator, OJJDP, Council Vice Chair*****

# image1.jpeg
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Broadband Networks, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Patrick Soon-Hock Lim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim

Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2002
#### In the Matter of Darnay Harris et al., Respondents, v Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to file a late notice of claim, the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated September 20, 1988, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) permits the court to consider all relevant factors and to exercise considerable discretion in determining whether to permit service of a late notice of claim *(see, Matter of Mazzilli v City of New York,*115 AD2d 604, 605). Considering all relevant factors, we conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion in granting leave to file a late notice of claim. The petitioners have established a reasonable excuse for their failure to timely serve their notice of claim; namely, their excusable error concerning the identity of the public corporation against which the claim should have been asserted. The injured petitioner’s mistaken belief that the library where he was injured was owned and operated by an entity other than the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (hereinafter the Dormitory Authority) was reasonable since the Queens College campus where the library was located was not owned and operated by the Dormitory Authority. Moreover, error concerning the identity of the governmental entity to be served can be excused provided that a prompt application for relief is made after discovery of the error *(see, Matter of Morris v County of Suffolk,*58 NY2d 767). In the present case, an application to serve a late notice of claim was made as soon as the petitioners learned that the Dormitory Authority was the actual owner of the area surrounding the library.

Additionally, the Dormitory Authority’s conclusory allegation of severe prejudice is unsupported by the record *(see, Matter of Mazzilli v City of New York, supra,*at 606). The Dormitory Authority claims it was prejudiced by the failure to provide timely notice because it was thereby deprived of the *561opportunity to inspect the accident site, but it has conceded that the site was under construction and continuously changing and that the debris which caused the petitioner to fall was a transient condition. The Dormitory Authority has offered no evidence indicating that it would have been able to effectively investigate the present claim had it been given timely notice 90 days after the accident. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 30, 2020

No. 04-20-00407-CV

Marian HADDAD,

Appellant

v.

TRI-COUNTY A/C & HEATING, LLC,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-0908-CV

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting en banc: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice1

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice2

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On September 30, 2020, a panel of this court dismissed this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction based on a late-filed notice of appeal. On October 30, 2020, Appellant filed a 

motion for en banc reconsideration, see Tex. R. App. P. 49.7, without requesting an extension of 

time to file the motion, see Tex. R. App. P. 49.8. The en banc court sua sponte extended 

the deadline for Appellant to file a motion for extension of time, which she filed on November 

23, 2020. We requested Appellee to file a response to Appellant’s motion for en banc 

consideration, which the Appellee then filed on December 3, 2020. After consideration, the 

motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

1 Justice Alvarez dissents with opinion. 2 Justice Chapa dissents to the denial of the motion for en banc reconsideration and joins Justice Alvarez’s opinion 

dissenting from the denial. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of December, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RM98-1-000]

      ( print page 70898)    
This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.220(h), of the receipt of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications.

The following is a list of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications received in the Office of the Secretary within the preceding 14 days.

None were received.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30209 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 4:22-cr-00324-P Document 26 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 61
Case 4:22-cr-00324-P Document 26 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 62
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 86 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 86

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR UNVEILING OF SOJOURNER TRUTH 
              BUST.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on April 28, 2009, to unveil a 
bust of Sojourner Truth.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 22, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 86

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
            for the unveiling of a bust of Sojourner Truth.
```
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, George E. Crapple, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn Ridgefield
Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust (the
Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.


/s/ George E. Crapple
--------------------------
George E. Crapple
Co-Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2006