Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 28, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 70791

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 342, 360b, 371.

2. Section 556.70 is revised to read as

follows:

§ 556.70 Bacitracin.

(a) Acceptable daily intake (ADI). The

ADI for total residues of bacitracin is

0.05 milligram per kilogram of body

weight per day.

(b) Tolerances. The tolerance for

residues of bacitracin from zinc

bacitracin or bacitracin methylene

disalicylate in uncooked edible tissues

of cattle, swine, chickens, turkeys,

pheasants, and quail, and in milk and

eggs is 0.5 part per million.

3. Section 556.592 is added to subpart

B to read as follows:

§ 556.592 Salinomycin.

(a) Acceptable daily intake (ADI). The

ADI for total residues of salinomycin is

0.005 milligram per kilogram of body

weight per day.

(b) [Reserved]

PART 558—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR

USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

1. The authority citation for 21 CFR

part 558 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.

2. Section 558.550 is amended by

adding paragraphs (a)(3), (d)(1)(xx), and

(d)(1)(xxi); by redesignating paragraphs

(d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), and (d)(3)(iv) as

paragraphs (d)(3)(iv), (d)(3)(vi), and

(d)(3)(vii), respectively; and by adding

paragraphs (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), and

(d)(3)(v) to read as follows:

§ 558.550 Salinomycin.

(a) * * *

(3) To 046573 for use as in paragraphs

(d)(1)(xv), (d)(1)(xvi), (d)(1)(xviii)

through (d)(1)(xxi), and (d)(3)(ii)

through (d)(3)(vii) of this section.

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(1) * * *

(xx)(A) Amount per ton. Salinomycin,

40 to 60 grams; and bacitracin

methylene disalicylate, 50 grams.

(B) Indications for use. For the

prevention of coccidiosis caused by

Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E.

acervulina, E. maxima, E. brunetti, and

E. mivati, and as an aid in the

prevention of necrotic enteritis caused

or complicated by Clostridium spp. or

other organisms susceptible to

bacitracin.

(C) Limitations. Feed continuously as

sole ration. Do not feed to laying

chickens. May be fatal if fed to adult

turkeys or to horses. Salinomycin as

provided by 063238; bacitracin

methylene disalicylate as provided by

046573 in § 510.600(c) in this chapter.

(xxi)(A) Amount per ton.

Salinomycin, 40 to 60 grams; and

bacitracin methylene disalicylate, 100 to

200 grams.

(B) Indications for use. For the

prevention of coccidiosis caused by

Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E.

acervulina, E. maxima, E. brunetti, and

E. mivati, and as an aid in the control

of necrotic enteritis caused or

complicated by Clostridium spp. or

other organisms susceptible to

bacitracin.

(C) Limitations. Feed continuously as

sole ration. To control necrotic enteritis,

start medication at first clinical signs of

disease; vary dosage based on the

severity of infection; administer

continuously for 5 to 7 days or as long

as clinical signs persist, then reduce

bacitracin to prevention level (50 grams

per ton). Do not feed to laying chickens.

May be fatal if fed to adult turkeys or

to horses. Salinomycin as provided by

063238; bacitracin methylene

disalicylate as provided by 046573 in

§ 510.600(c) in this chapter.

* * * * *

(3) * * *

(ii) Amount per ton. Salinomycin, 40

to 60 grams, and bacitracin methylene

disalicylate, 4 to 50 grams.

(A) Indications for use. For the

prevention of coccidiosis caused by

Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E.

acervulina, E. maxima, E. brunetti, and

E. mivati, and for increased rate of

weight gain and improved feed

efficiency.

(B) Limitations. Feed continuously as

sole ration. Discontinue use prior to

sexual maturity. Do not feed to laying

chickens. May be fatal if fed to adult

turkeys or to horses. Salinomycin as

provided by 063238; bacitracin

methylene disalicylate as provided by

046573 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.

(iii) Amount per ton. Salinomycin, 40

to 60 grams, and bacitracin methylene

disalicylate, 50 grams.

(A) Indications for use. For the

prevention of coccidiosis caused by

Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E.

acervulina, E. maxima, E. brunetti, and

E. mivati, and as an aid in the

prevention of necrotic enteritis caused

or complicated by Clostridium spp. or

other organisms susceptible to

bacitracin.

(B) Limitations. Feed continuously as

sole ration. Discontinue use prior to

sexual maturity. Do not feed to laying

chickens. May be fatal if fed to adult

turkeys or to horses. Salinomycin as

provided by 063238; bacitracin

methylene disalicylate as provided by

046573 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.

* * * * *

(v) Amount per ton. Salinomycin, 40

to 60 grams, and bacitracin methylene

disalicylate, 100 to 200 grams.

(A) Indications for use. For the

prevention of coccidiosis caused by

Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E.

acervulina, E. maxima, E. brunetti, and

E. mivati, and as an aid in the control

of necrotic enteritis caused or

complicated by Clostridium spp. or

other organisms susceptible to

bacitracin.

(B) Limitations. Feed continuously as

sole ration. To control necrotic enteritis,

start medication at first clinical signs of

disease; vary dosage based on the

severity of infection; administer

continuously for 5 to 7 days or as long

as clinical signs persist, then reduce

bacitracin to prevention level (50 grams

per ton). Discontinue use prior to sexual

maturity. Do not feed to laying chickens.

May be fatal if fed to adult turkeys or

to horses. Salinomycin as provided by

063238; bacitracin methylene

disalicylate as provided by 046573 in

§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.

* * * * *

Dated: November 6, 2000.

Stephen F. Sundlof,

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.

[FR Doc. 00–30327 Filed 11–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160–01–F

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 25

[TD 8899]

RIN 1545–AW25

Definition of a Qualified Interest in a

Grantor Retained Annuity Trust and a

Grantor Retained Unitrust; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),

Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

SUMMARY: This document contains

corrections to final regulations that were

published in the Federal Register on

Tuesday, September 5, 2000 (65 FR

53587), relating to the definition of a

qualified interest under section 2702 of

the Internal Revenue Code.

DATES: This correction is effective

September 5, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James F. Hogan (202) 622–3090 (not a

toll-free number).

70792 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 28, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The final regulations that are subject

of these corrections are under section

2702 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

As published, final regulations (TD

8899) contain errors that may prove to

be misleading and are in need of

clarification.

Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication of the

final regulations (TD 8899), which were

the subject of FR Doc. 00–22544, is

corrected as follows:

§ 25.2702–3 [Corrected]

1. On page 53589, column 1,

§ 25.2702–3(b)(3), the paragraph

heading ‘‘Payment of annuity amount.’’

is corrected to read ‘‘Period for payment

of annuity amount.’’.

2. On page 53589, column 1,

§ 25.2702–3(b)(4), first sentence, the

language ‘‘An annuity amount payable

based on the anniversary date of the

creation of the trust must be paid by the

anniversary date.’’ is corrected to read

‘‘An annuity amount payable based on

the anniversary date of the creation of

the trust must be paid no later than 105

days after the anniversary date.’’.

3. On page 53589, column 2,

§ 25.2702–3(c)(3), the paragraph heading

‘‘Payment of unitrust amount.’’ is

corrected to read ‘‘Period for payment of

unitrust amount.’’.

4. On page 53589, column 2,

§ 25.2702–3(c)(4), first sentence, ‘‘A

unitrust amount payable based on the

anniversary date of the creation of the

trust must be paid by the anniversary

date.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘A unitrust

amount payable based on the

anniversary date of the creation of the

trust must be paid no later than 105

days after the anniversary date.’’.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special

Counsel (Modernization & Strategic

Planning).

[FR Doc. 00–30265 Filed 11–27–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[TX–130–1–7473a; FRL–6907–8]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Texas; Excess

Emissions During Startup, Shutdown,

Malfunction and Maintenance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is taking direct final

action on revisions to the Texas State

Implementation Plan (SIP). These

revisions concern 30 TAC, Chapter 101,

General Air Quality Rules, General

Rules, specifically, the reporting and

recordkeeping requirements for excess

emissions resulting from Startup,

Shutdown, Malfunction, and

Maintenance (SSM) episodes. The EPA

is approving these revisions to regulate

excess emissions in accordance with the

requirements of the Federal Clean Air

Act (the Act) and EPA’s policy on

excess emissions.

DATES: This rule is effective on January

29, 2001 without further notice, unless

EPA receives adverse comment by

December 28, 2000. If EPA receives such

comment, EPA will publish a timely

withdrawal in the Federal Register

informing the public that this rule will

not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Mr.

Thomas H. Diggs, Chief, Air Planning

Section (6PD–L), at the EPA Region 6

Office listed below. Copies of

documents relevant to this action are

available for public inspection during

normal business hours at the following

locations. Anyone wanting to examine

these documents should make an

appointment with the appropriate office

at least two working days in advance.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 6, Air Planning Section (6PD–

L), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas

75202–2733

Texas Natural Resource Conservation

Commission, Office of Air Quality,

12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas

78753

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Alan Shar, P.E., Air Planning Section

(6PD–L), EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,

telephone (214) 665–6691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

1. What action is EPA taking?

2. Where can I find EPA policies on excess

emission during SSM?

3. Is there a difference between EPA’s old

policy on excess emission and the new

policy?

4. What does the new policy say?

5. What does the current Texas approved SIP

rule say about excess emission during

SSM?

6. What are advantages of the new Texas rule

revision?

7. What is a Reportable Quantity?

8. What does a source do if its excess

emission during SSM is less than RQ?

9. Who has to report an excess emission

during SSM?

10. Do minor sources have to report excess

emission during SSM?

11. What areas in Texas will this rule affect?

12. What is a State Implementation Plan?

13. What is the Federal approval process for

a SIP?

14. What does Federal approval of a SIP

mean to me?

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’

and ‘‘our’’ means EPA.

1. What Action Is EPA Taking?

On July 31, 2000, George W. Bush, the

Governor of Texas submitted the Texas

30 TAC Chapter 101, General Air

Quality Rules, General Rules, as a

revision to the existing Texas SIP. Texas

specifically submitted revisions to

sections 101.01 concerning Definitions;

101.06 concerning Upset Reporting and

Recordkeeping Requirements; 101.07

concerning Maintenance, Startup and

Shutdown Reporting, Recordkeeping

and Operational Requirements; and

101.11 concerning Demonstrations.

In this document, we are approving

these revisions to the Texas SIP. For

more information on the SIP revision

and our evaluation, please refer to our

Technical Support Document (TSD)

dated October 2000.

2. Where Can I Find EPA Policies on

Excess Emission During SSM?

You can find our policies on excess

emissions during SSM in the following

documents: (1) Memoranda from

Kathleen Bennett, formerly Assistant

Administrator for Air, Noise and

Radiation dated September 28, 1982,

and February 15, 1983 (the Bennett

Memo—old policy), and (2)

Memorandum from Steven A. Herman,

Assistant Administrator for Enforcement

and Compliance Assurance, dated

September 20, 1999 (the Herman

Memo—new policy). The Herman

Memo supplements the Bennett Memo.

Our TSD dated October 2000, contains

both of these documents.