alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Trade and Development Agency

# AGENCY:

Trade and Development Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the Trade and Development Agency's Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Larry P. Bevan, Assistant Director for Management Trade and Development Agency, 1621 N. Kent Street, Arlington, VA, 22209-2131 (703) 875-4357.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c)(1) through (5), U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior executive.

The following have been selected as acting members of the Performance Review Board of the Trade and Development Agency; James Painter, Director, Office of Budget, U.S. Agency for International Development; Kathleen O'Hara, Deputy Director, Office of Procurement, Bureau of Management, U.S. Agency for International Development; and Andrew Luten, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Agency for International Development.

Dated: November 21, 2000.

Larry P. Bevan,

Assistant Director for Management.

[FR Doc. 00-30179  Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8040-01-M
#### PARKS v. STATE.

No. 21536.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 2, 1941.

Willis & Via, of Pampa, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of. Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the murder with malice of Boyd Wilkinson, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ninety-nine years.

No statement of facts has been-brought forward. The only exceptions we find relate to the refusal of quite a number of special charges which were requested. We observe that most of them appear to have been covered in the main charge-given by the court, and such as were not so included cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40129 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARCOS GARCIA-ROMERO, also known as Enrique Majuuf, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-255-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marcos GarciaRomero raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Fourth Amendment to the Zions Bancorporation Payshelter 401(k) & Employee Stock



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
 TO THE

 ZIONS BANCORPORATION PAYSHELTER 401(k) 
 AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 
  
 This Fourth Amendment to the Zions Bancorporation Payshelter 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) is made and entered into this 18th day of March, 2005, by Zions Bancorporation Benefits
Committee for and on behalf of Zions Bancorporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Employer.” 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, Zions Bancorporation (the “Employer”) has heretofore entered into the Plan, which Plan has been amended and restated in its entirety
effective for the Plan Year commencing on January 1, 2003, and for all Plan Years thereafter, and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Employer has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or in part; and 
  
 WHEREAS, Zions Bancorporation Benefits Committee, for and on behalf of Zions Bancorporation and consistent with the power
and authority granted to it, now desires to amend the Plan to conform to the requirements of IRC §401(a)(31)(B) (providing for automatic rollovers from qualified plans on cash-out distributions over $1,000); and 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual
covenants herein contained, the Employer adopts the following amendments to the Plan as follows (amended language is marked in bold italics): 







 1. Section 9.03 is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 
  
 For all distributions commencing on or after March 28,
2005, the five thousand dollar ($5,000) threshold amount in this Section shall be reduced to one thousand dollars ($1,000). 
  
 2. Section 11.03 is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 
  
 For all distributions commencing on or after March 28, 2005, the five thousand dollar ($5,000)
threshold amount in this Section shall be reduced to one thousand dollars ($1,000). 
  
 3. This Fourth Amendment shall be effective March 28, 2005, and for Plan Years commencing after that date. 
  
 4. In all other respects the Plan is ratified and approved. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Zions Bancorporation Benefits Committee has caused this Fourth Amendment to the Plan to be duly executed as of the date and year first
above written. 
  

			
	 ZIONS BANCORPORATION
 BENEFITS COMMITTEE

		
	 By:
	 	 /S/ DIANA M.
ANDERSEN        

	 	 	 Diana M. Andersen
 Vice President



  

 2
Exhibit 10.1 - Management Profit Sharing Program



EXHIBIT 10.1

 

MANAGEMENT PROFIT SHARING PROGRAM



 

               
It is Moog's practice to award annual cash bonuses to management, including
executive officers, based on Moog's year over year percentage improvement in
diluted earnings per share ("EPS"). The bonus amount payable to any participant
is determined by multiplying the participant's base salary by the product of the
percentage improvement in Moog's EPS and a multiplier of up to 1.33 based on a
participant's responsibilities, with executive officers generally having the
higher multiplier. Notwithstanding an improvement in EPS, the determination to
make an award under the program and, if made, its allocation, are discretionary.
Further, any payments to executive officers under the program are subject to
approval by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ET

U.S. Department of Justice 

810 7th Street, NW 

Washington, DC 

Main Conference Room, 3rd Floor

1:00 – 1:20 p.m. Welcome, Opening Remarks, and Introductions

Amy L. Solomon, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice

Programs, U.S. Department of Justice

Liz Ryan, Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 

Prevention (OJJDP), and Vice Chair, Coordinating Council 

1:20 – 1:30 p.m. Agency and Practitioner Introductions

1:30 – 2:00 p.m. OJJDP’s Continuum of Care

Kristen Kracke, Associate Administrator, OJJDP, and 

Chair, Policy Subcommittee 

2:00 – 2:20 p.m. Council Business: Subcommittee Reports 

Kellie Blue, Associate Administrator, OJJDP, and 

Co-Chair, Programs and Practice Subcommittee 

Kristen Kracke, Associate Administrator, OJJDP, and 

Chair, Policy Subcommittee 

2:20 – 2:35 p.m. Break
2:35 – 3:00 p.m.

3:00 – 3:55 p.m.

Formulating Recommendations for Council Action

Marcy Mistrett, Senior Policy Specialist, OJJDP

Prioritization of Recommendations and Discussion

Liz Ryan, Vice Chair 

CoordinatingCouncil Membership

3:55 – 4:00 p.m. Wrap Up and Adjournment
Salaries for the Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 Summary of Fiscal 2005 Salaries 
 for the Named Executive Officers 
 of Sigma-Aldrich Corporation 
  
 The following table sets forth the fiscal 2005 salaries for each of the Company’s named
executive officers: 
  

				
	 	  	 Fiscal 2005
 Salary


	 David R. Harvey
 Chairman & Chief
 Executive Officer
	  	$	725,000
		
	 Michael R. Hogan
 Chief Administrative Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
	  	$	430,000
		
	 David W. Julien
 President, Biotechnology
	  	$	310,000
		
	 Jai. P. Nagarkatti
 President & Chief Operating
 Officer, President Scientific Research
	  	$	470,000
		
	 Frank D. Wicks
 President, SAFC
	  	$	320,000

  
 The Company’s Compensation
Committee reviews with the CEO an annual salary plan for the Company’s executive officers and then approves such plan with any modifications it deems appropriate. The Committee approves the salary plan after assessing the Company’s overall
performance, including a general review of the operating results of the Company, its competitors and its peers, the executive officers’ responsibilities and performance and compensation received by executives in similar positions. The review of
operating results is general in nature. In reviewing the individual executive officers’ responsibilities and performance, the Committee also considers their non-financial contributions to the Company, such as the quality and progress of
research, marketing, production and process improvement activities. The Committee performs its review in a general, subjective manner with consideration given to all factors. The Committee generally believes that salaries for the Company’s
executive officers should be at the 50th percentile of comparable companies if performance is similar to those peer companies. The named executive officers are eligible for cash bonuses up to 66.6% of their annual salaries. 
  

 21
### -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 -75.0 38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0 

## ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/01 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
Financial  Statements  for the 3 months ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements filed with form 10QSB and
for the 3 month period ended June 30, 1998.
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       18,961
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             22,082
<PP&E>                                       57,661
<DEPRECIATION>                               27,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              304,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       266,316
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     24,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                1,302,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                304,052
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,364
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            182,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           28,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (209,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              (209,059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF UTAH

WILLIAM J., individually and on behalf of 

his minor child, J.J.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TEXAS; 

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC; and TI 

WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN,

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING [16] STIPULATED 

MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

Case No. 2:22-cv-00407-DBB

District Judge David Barlow

The court, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Transfer Venue,1relevant 

law,2and for good cause shown, hereby ORDERS that the motion be granted. William J. v. 

BlueCross BlueShield of Texas, No. 2:22-cv-00407, will be transferred to the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

Signed August 30, 2022.

BY THE COURT

________________________________________

David Barlow

United States District Judge

1 ECF No. 16, filed Aug. 29, 2022.

2 See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

Case 3:22-cv-01919-G Document 17 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 49
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WITCHITA FALLS DIVISION

ALI HUNEITI,

Plaintiff,

v.

WALMART, INC. AND WAL-MART 

STORES TEXAS, LLC,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00113-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Designate Local 

Counsel (ECF No. 4), filed November 17, 2022. The Court has considered the Motion and finds 

that it should be, and is, hereby GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff designate 

local counsel pursuant to Local Rule 83.10 by November 28, 2022. 

SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2022. 

Case 7:22-cv-00113-O Document 5 Filed 11/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4478 — KKR/Goldman Sachs/Kion)

(2006/C 289/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
US Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, AeroNav Products 

# Ü Temporary R-2509N Graphic Request 16-AWP-3 Temporary R-2509E Temporary R-2509W
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1285

To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 relating to authorization of

appropriations for construction of public buildings by committee resolution approval.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Mr. GLICKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Public Buildings Act of 1959 relating to

authorization of appropriations for construction of public

buildings by committee resolution approval.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Buildings Act

5 Amendments of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO PUBLIC BUILDINGS ACT OF 1959.

7 Section 7(a) of the Public Buildings Act of 1959 (40

8 U.S.C. 606(a)) is amended—
2

•HR 1285 IH

1 (1) by inserting after the third sentence the fol2 lowing: ‘‘No resolution of approval shall be adopted

3 by such committee for construction, alteration, pur4 chase, or acquisition of a building before the Admin5 istrator has submitted to the committees a prospec6 tus of the proposed facility.’’;

7 (2) in paragraph (4) by striking ‘‘and’’ follow8 ing ‘‘available’’ and inserting a comma; and

9 (3) in paragraph (4) by inserting after ‘‘pro10 posed action’’ the following: ‘‘, and that the vacancy

11 rate, in the State within 30 miles of the proposed fa12 cility, for commercial office space comparable to that

13 to be provided by the proposed facility is greater

14 than 10 percent unless the Administrator certifies in

15 the prospectus that material and substantial savings

16 will accrue to taxpayers of the United States from

17 the proposed facility’’.

Æ
# Official Journal C 209/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 209 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4931 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 209

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4931 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 209/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 209/2 | Amended list of experts appointed as members of the scientific committees | 2 |
| 2006/C 209/3 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 7 |
| 2006/C 209/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4377 — Doughty Hanson/Caudwell Group Mobile Distribution Business) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 11 |
| 2006/C 209/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4057 — Korsnäs/Assidomän Cartonboard) (1) | 12 |
| 2006/C 209/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4283 — Fogeca/Mapfre/JV) (1) | 12 |
| 2006/C 209/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4255 — Evraz/Strategic Minerals) (1) | 13 |
| 2006/C 209/8 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4228 — Mibau Holding/Foster Yeoman Baumineralien/Figdor Baustoffhandel JV) (1) | 13 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 209/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 209/2

Amended list of experts appointed as members of the scientific committees

2

2006/C 209/3

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

7

2006/C 209/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4377 — Doughty Hanson/Caudwell Group Mobile Distribution Business) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

11

2006/C 209/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4057 — Korsnäs/Assidomän Cartonboard) (1)

12

2006/C 209/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4283 — Fogeca/Mapfre/JV) (1)

12

2006/C 209/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4255 — Evraz/Strategic Minerals) (1)

13

2006/C 209/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4228 — Mibau Holding/Foster Yeoman Baumineralien/Figdor Baustoffhandel JV) (1)

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
{"agency":"NCD","generated":"2020-04-15 08:43:29","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NCD"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["5"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["4"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["1"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q2"}