alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
: __ .; L~ 

._.:_'I ,_, -,_ ]L! UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL. 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL; INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

DOT -OST -1995-272 

formerly Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: October 31, 2014 

Respectfully submitted, 

13~ ;:;- {///~ Blane Workie 

Acting Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Vinh Q. Nguyen 

· Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
3 

Docket No. DOT -OST -1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 31st day of October, 2014, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 

Scot Spencer 

22604 Esplanada Circle 

Boca Raton, Florida 33433
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

and 

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING GROUP, 

INC.; et al., 

Intervenor-Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O 

 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF TACTICAL MACHINING, LLC’S 

MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL 

 Before the Court is Plaintiff Tactical Machining, LLC’s Motion for Injunction Pending 

Appeal. 

 Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

 

Signed this the ________ day of _____________________, 2023. 

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REED O’CONNOR 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 262-2 Filed 09/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5243
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,
as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha
Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C28 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement,
I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.





Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

























Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case 4:22-cr-00312-Y Document 33 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 69
Case 4:22-cr-00312-Y Document 33 Filed 11/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 70
Exhibit 34.12






Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined management’s
assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the “Company”), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for
which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the
year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by
it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was
conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior
to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period
covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December
31, 2015 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service
provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016







PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 
75201 T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991,www.pwc.com/us
Us Oncology, Inc



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.
Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|/s/ R. Dale Ross                            
|R. Dale Ross                                
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology, Inc.
|                                            
|May 7, 2004
Agenda -- May 2006 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings April 27-28, 2006 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 5:00 p.m. on 

Wednesday, April 26 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and kameke.sweeney@ny.frb.org. 

Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses 

are still appreciated. 

I. Borrowing Estimates Central 

Estimate

Range that would 

not surprise you 

 April-June 

 Ending Cash Balance 

 July-September 

 Ending Cash Balance 

 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

 FY 2006 

 FY 2007 

 

III. Quarterly Note Issuance 

 3-year note 

 10-year note 

 10-year note reopening 

 2-year note May/Jun/Jul / / / / - / / 

 5-year note May/Jun/Jul / / / / - / / 

 10-year TIPS 

 20-year TIPS reopening 

Discussion Topics 

1. Given your assessments of budget projections and April tax receipts, do you believe 

the current financing schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s financing needs going 

forward? If not, please elaborate on changes that you believe are needed. 

2. Please comment on conditions at the long end of the Treasury curve. How do you see 

supply in the long end matching up with the market demand for nominal and real 

duration?
# Official Journal L 290/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6510 November 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 290

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6510 November 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP) [2022/2124] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP) [2022/2124]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 262/21 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 262 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4821 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 262

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4821 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 262/1 | Drawing of lots concerning judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 262/2 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2005/C 262/3 | Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 262/4 | Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) | 4 |
| 2005/C 262/5 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 5 |
| 2005/C 262/6 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 9 |
| 2005/C 262/7 | Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 262/1

Drawing of lots concerning judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal

1

Commission

2005/C 262/2

Euro exchange rates

2

2005/C 262/3

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

3

2005/C 262/4

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

4

2005/C 262/5

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

5

2005/C 262/6

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

9

2005/C 262/7

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

 

CLIFFORD CLARK, §

TDCJ No. 2239054, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00059-M-BP

 § 

MICHAEL WADDELL, et al., §

§ 

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 33, 49) are GRANTED 

in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants in their official capacity, for 

injunctive relief, for return of property, and for Fourth and Fifth Amendment violations are 

DISMISSED without prejudice, and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Ramirez, Fox, Garcia, 

Skinner, Adkins, Hunley, Gonzales, Piercy, and Rodriguez under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for 

compensatory damages, for deprivation of his constitutional and statutory rights, and for 

conspiracy to violate those rights are DISMISSED with prejudice.

Further, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Waddell, Byrd, Ramirez, Garcia, 

Skinner, Adkins, Hunley, Piercy, and Rodriguez is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s Fourteenth 

Amendment equal protection claim against Defendants Waddell and Byrd. The motion is 

Case 7:22-cv-00059-M-BP Document 60 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 378
GRANTED in all other respects, and all of Plaintiff’s other claims against Defendants Waddell 

and Byrd are DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED this 12th day of December, 2023.

Case 7:22-cv-00059-M-BP Document 60 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 379
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2015-11-12 14:49:38","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"}],"value":"2015"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"7"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","DO","FinCEN","Fiscal Service","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["8","216","140","78","2165","16","380","59","25"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["5","241","132","87","2327","17","364","89","25"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["4","388","6","6","349"," ","8","8"," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2015","quarter":"Q4"}
EPA Conference Call with API May 23 , 2012 EPA staff met with American Petroleum Institute (API ) staff and its members to discuss their comments on the proposed changes to the UST regulations. Topics discussed included: wastewater treatment tanks, interstitial integrity testing, walkthroughs, and compatibility . Attendees: EPA – Li z McDermott, Mark Barolo, Carol yn Hoskinson, L inda Gerber, Tim Smith, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton, Cho Yi Kwan, Paul Miller. Andrea Barbery API – Prentiss Searles, Brian Knapp BP – Dennis Bo yd ExxonMobil – Darin Knowlton Marathon – Jason Rosecrans, Michelle McKee Hess – Jim Howard
Raymond De Leon, et /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 26, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00751

- CV

Josefina Alexander GONZALEZ , et al.,

Appellants

v.

Raymond DE LEON, et al.,

App ellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CVQ

- 001098

- D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 259 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 259

            Concerning United States policy towards Somalia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1993

Mr. Gilman (for himself and Mr. Solomon) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
            Concerning United States policy towards Somalia.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

    The Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) United States Armed Forces made significant 
        contributions under Operation Restore Hope towards the 
        establishment of a secure environment for humanitarian relief 
        operations and restoration of peace in the region to end the 
        humanitarian disaster that had claimed more than 300,000 lives.
            (2) The mission of United States Armed Forces in support of 
        the United Nations appears to be evolving from the 
        establishment of ``a secure environment for humanitarian relief 
        operations,'' as set out in United Nations Security Council 
        Resolution 794 of December 3, 1992, to one of internal security 
        and nation building.

SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF CONGRESSIONAL POLICY.

    (a) Consultation with the Congress.--The President should consult 
closely with the Congress regarding United States policy with respect 
to Somalia, including in particular the deployment of United States 
Armed Forces in that country, whether under United Nations or United 
States command.
    (b) Planning.--The United States shall facilitate the assumption of 
the functions of United States Armed Forces by the United Nations.
    (c) Reporting Requirement.--
            (1) In general.--The President shall ensure that the goals 
        and objectives supporting deployment of United States Armed 
        Forces to Somalia and a description of the mission, command 
        arrangements, size, functions, location, and anticipated 
        duration in Somalia of those forces are clearly articulated and 
        provided in a detailed report to the Congress by October 15, 
        1993.
            (2) Inclusion of status of transfer of functions.--Such 
        report shall include the status of planning to transfer the 
        functions contained in subsection (b).
    (d) Congressional Approval.--Upon reporting under the requirements 
of subsection (c), the Congress believes the President should by 
November 15, 1993, seek and receive congressional authorization in 
order for the deployment of United States Armed Forces to Somalia to 
continue.

                                 <all>
```