alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VICTOR ALVAREZ,

Appellant,

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00129-CR

Appeal from the

81st/218th District Court

of Wilson County, Texas

TC# 11-07-00090-CRW

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-27-1997
<CASH>                                          23,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,750
<INVENTORY>                                     21,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,920
<PP&E>                                         177,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,520
<BONDS>                                         50,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           237
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,041
<SALES>                                         66,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,653
<CGS>                                           80,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,438
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,647)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.70)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 34.1





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors of The Huntington National Bank





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that The Huntington National Bank (the “Bank”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Consumer Automotive Receivables Platform (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)1(iii), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)3(i.D), 1122(d)4(ix), 1122(d)4(x), 1122(d)4(xi), 1122(d)4(xii), 1122(d)4(xiii), and 1122(d)4(xv), which the Bank has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the Platform. Appendix B to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Bank processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Bank during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Bank during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank’s compliance with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that The Huntington National Bank complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December, 31 2015 for the Consumer Automotive Receivables Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Columbus, Ohio


March 29, 2016
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement of Compliancefor Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approval of amendment to Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has 
approved the Amendment to the Compact between the Confederated Salish 
and Kootenai Tribes and the State of Montana Regarding Class III Gaming 
on the Flathead Reservation, executed on October 17, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective November 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-30036 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2301

IBRAHIM SAID OMAR, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-151-868) Submitted: April 9, 2004 Decided: April 29, 2004 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey B. Elikan, Mark D. Maneche, VENABLE, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Jay Singer, Matthew M. Collette, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ibrahim Said Omar, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum. We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision, designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find that substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s conclusion that Omar failed to establish the past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2003) (stating that the burden of proofis on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. EliasZacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). We will reverse the Board only if the evidence “‘was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting EliasZacarias , 502 U.S. at 483-84). We find no such compelling evidence. We deny Omar’s pet ition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ALTON SMITH, §

#72113, §

PETITIONER, §

§

V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:22-CV-2203-K-BK

§

FRANK HUGHES, §

RESPONDENT. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The court reviewed the 

proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the 

court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

Signed January 4th, 2023.

____________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02203-K-BK Document 6 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DANIEL P. KELLY, JR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC,

 Defendant.

Case No. 3:22-cv-01412-N

Honorable David C. Godbey 

JOINT STATUS REPORT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and this Court’s Order (Dkt. #12), the Parties submit the 

following Joint Status Report.

1. A brief statement of the nature of the case, including the contentions of the parties: 

Plaintiff’s position: Plaintiff brings his Complaint for alleged violations of the Telephone 

Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. and the Texas Debt 

Collection Act (“TDCA”) under Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 392 et seq. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges 

that Defendant violated the TCPA and TDCA by repeatedly calling Plaintiff’s cellular phone 

attempting to collect upon the subject debt after Plaintiff had demanded that the collection calls 

cease. Plaintiff had made his demands for the calls to cease both verbally and in writing. 

Furthermore, Plaintiff has been subjected to numerous pre-recorded messages from Defendant 

after he had made his requests for the collection calls to cease.

Defendant’s position: Defendant denies the allegations of wrongdoing asserted by 

Plaintiff, denies liability under the statutes referenced, and denies that Plaintiff is entitled to any 

of the relief requested. In particular, Defendant states that the calls at issue are not subject to the 

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 14 Filed 10/03/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 38
TCPA, Plaintiff was working with Defendant to obtain a modification and the calls were 

permissible, and no wrongdoing was committed. 

2. The status of settlement discussions (excluding any discussion of amounts);

Plaintiff has tendered a settlement demand to Defendant and the parties are discussing 

same.

3. Possible joinder of additional parties;

At this time, the parties believe it is unlikely that any additional parties will be joined nor 

the pleadings amended.

4. Any challenge to jurisdiction or venue;

None.

5. Any pending motions:

None.

6. Date by which the case will be ready for trial and estimated length of trial:

The parties anticipate this case will be ready for trial by August of 2023 and will last no 

more than 2 days.

7. The desirability of ADR, and the timing for ADR;

The parties propose mediation to assist in facilitating resolving this case to be completed 

before the close of discovery.

8. Any objections to disclosure under Rule 26(a)(1);

None at this time.

Dated: September 28, 2022

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 14 Filed 10/03/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 39
/s/ Nathan Volheim

Nathan C. Volheim, #6302103

Sulaiman Law Group, Ltd.

2500 South Highland Ave., Suite 200

Lombard, Illinois 60148

Phone: (630) 568-3056

Facsimile: (630) 575-8188

nvolheim@sulaimanlaw.com

 Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Elizabeth K. Duffy

Elizabeth K. Duffy

Locke Lord LLP

2200 Ross Ave., Ste. 2800

Dallas, Texas 75201

Phone: (214) 740-8000

Fax: (214) 740-8800

eduffy@lockelord.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 14 Filed 10/03/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 40
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29628]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3478]


Office of Visa Services; 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information 
Collection: J Visa Waiver Review Application Data Sheet

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: New collection of information Originating Office: 
CA/VO.
    Title of Information Collection: J Visa Waiver Review Application 
Data Sheet.
    Frequency: Once per application.
    Form Number: None assigned.
    Respondents: Foreign Applicants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents per year: 10,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 2 hours.
    Total Estimated Burden: 20,000 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Public comments, or requests for 
additional information, regarding the collection listed in this notice 
should be directed to Eric Cohan, 2401 E St NW, Rm L-703, U.S. 
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, Tel: 202-663-1164.

    Dated: September 14, 2000.
George Lannon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa Services, Bureau of Consular 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-29628 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

CHAUNCIL-DANIELLE WILLIAMS, § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § No. 3:22-cv-02388-N (BT) 

§ 

DALLAS COUNTY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and 

the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated 

October 31, 2022, the Court finds that the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 

are correct, and they are accepted as the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Court. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2022. 

 ________________________________ 

 DAVID C. GODBEY 

CHIEF JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02388-N-BT Document 10 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 36
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2964]



[[Page 6443]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Midwest District

AGENCY:  Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury

ACTION:  Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  An open meeting of the Midwest Citizen Advocacy Panel will be 
held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

DATES:  The meeting will be held Thursday, February 24, 2000, and 
Friday, February 25, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra McQuin at 1-888-912-1227, or 
414-297-1604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a working meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel (CAP) will be held 
Thursday, February 24, 2000, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Friday, 
February 25, 2000, from 9:00 a.m. to Noon at Courtyard Marriott, 
Meeting Room B, 300 W. Michigan Street, Milwaukee, WI. The Citizen 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Written 
comments can be submitted to the panel by faxing to (414) 297-1623, or 
by mail to Citizen Advocacy Panel, Mail Stop 1006 MIL, 310 West 
Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221. The Agenda will include the 
following: Various IRS issue updates and reports by the CAP sub-groups, 
presentation of taxpayer issues by individual members, CAP office 
report, and discussion of issues.

    Note:  Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: February 1, 2000.
John J. Mannion,
Program Manager, Taxpayer Advocate Service.
[FR Doc. 00-2964 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Kang Yihua  , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By: __/s/ Kang Yihua___________________________              Kang Yihua

            Chief Executive Officer March 21, 2006
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 79 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.79
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  To authorize the President to issue a proclamation designating the 
week beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994, as 
``National Family Week''.

Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly 
  society;
Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family as a unit essential to the 
  continued well-being of the United States; and
Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the 
  importance of family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is hereby 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the week 
beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994 as ``National 
Family Week''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
# Official Journal L 177/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 177 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6419 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 177

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6419 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2021/799 of 16 September 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the OECD Public Governance Committee and the OECD Council on the draft Recommendation on Countering Illicit Trade: Enhancing Transparency in Free Trade Zones | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2021/799 of 16 September 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the OECD Public Governance Committee and the OECD Council on the draft Recommendation on Countering Illicit Trade: Enhancing Transparency in Free Trade Zones

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.