alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 398 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 398

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      To establish the fourth Sunday of July as ``Parents' Day''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the fourth Sunday of 
every July shall be established as ``Parents' Day'' to be recognized as 
a recurring, perennial day of commemoration.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION.

    All private citizens, organizations, and governmental and 
legislative bodies at the local, State, and Federal level are 
encouraged to recognize Parents' Day through proclamations, activities, 
and educational efforts in furtherance of recognizing, uplifting, and 
supporting the role of parents in the rearing of their children.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00467

- CR

Gary Franz DEVAUGHN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 202 1

- CR

- 11400 Honorable Ron Rangel , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before February 27, 2023 . Further requests for an extension of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha ve hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of February, 2023

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
apxr_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
   
  
  	 
	1

	  

	 

  
  	 
	2

	  

	 

  

  	 
	3

	  

	 

  
    	 
	4

	  

	 


  
  5
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 69275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29219]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MA-081-7211b; A-1-FRL-6897-5]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Massachusetts; Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance 
Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This 
revision establishes and requires the implementation of an enhanced 
inspection and maintenance program. In the Final Rules Section of this 
Federal Register, EPA is approving the Commonwealth's SIP submittal as 
a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views 
this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse 
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in 
response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA 
receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be 
withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting 
on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA 
receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this 
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the 
rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not 
the subject of an adverse comment.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 18, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to David Conroy, Unit Manager, Air 
Quality Planning, Office of Ecosystem Protection (mail code CAQ), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-New England, One Congress Street, 
Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114-2023. Copies of the State submittal and 
EPA's technical support document are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours, by appointment at the Office of Ecosystem 
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-New England, One 
Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston, MA and Division of Air Quality 
Control, Department of Environmental Protection, One Winter Street, 8th 
Floor, Boston, MA 02108.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Hagerty, (617) 918-1049.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: October 27, 2000.
Mindy S. Lubber,
Regional Administrator, EPA-New England.
[FR Doc. 00-29219 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
FILED: August 3, 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1419

(1:22-cv-00876-AJT-JFA)

ISRAEL ALVARADO; STEVEN BARFIELD; WALTER BROBST; JUSTIN 

BROWN; DAVID CALGER; MARK COX; JACOB EASTMAN; THOMAS 

FUSSELL; NATHANAEL GENTILHOMME; DOYLE HARRIS; JEREMIAH 

HENDERSON; ANDREW HIRKO; KRISTA INGRAM; RYAN JACKSON; 

JOSHUA LAYFIELD; JAMES LEE; BRAD LEWIS; ROBERT NELSON; RICK 

PAK; RANDY POGUE; GERARDO RODRIGUEZ; PARKER SCHNETZ; 

RICHARD SHAFFER; JONATHAN SHOUR; JEREMIAH SNYDER; DAVID 

TROYER; SETH WEAVER; THOMAS WITHERS; JUSTIN WINE; MATTHEW 

WRONSKI; JERRY YOUNG; BRENTON C. ASBURY; JORDAN BALLARD; 

CHAD BOOTH; JEREMIAH BOTELLO; CLAYTON DILTZ; MICHAEL HART; 

JACOB LAWRENCE; LANCE SCHRADER; JONATHAN ZAGDANSKI,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. 

Department of Defense; FRANK KENDALL, in his official capacity as Secretary of 

the Air Force, Department of the Air Force; CARLOS DEL TORO, in his official 

capacity as Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy; CHRISTINE 

WORMUTH, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army, Department of the 

Army; XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department 

of Health and Human Services; ROBERT CALIFF, M.D., in his official capacity as 

Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; ROCHELLE 

WALENSKY, in her official capacity as Director, Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention,

Defendants - Appellees.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1419 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 96-1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2031
2

O R D E R

Upon review of the submissions relative to the motion to dismiss, the court grants 

the motion and dismisses this appeal as moot. The court vacates the district court’s orders 

denying the preliminary injunction, dismissing the complaint, and denying reconsideration

and remands the case to the district court with directions to dismiss as moot. See United 

States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39–40 (1950); Hirschfeld v. Bureau of Alcohol, 

Firearms, Tobacco & Explosives, 14 F.4th 322, 327–328 (4th Cir. 2021). 

The motion for oral argument is denied. 

Entered at the direction of the panel: Judge Gregory, Judge Harris, and Judge 

Rushing.

For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1419 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 96-1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2032
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-OW-6903-2]


Notice of Intent To Develop Ambient Water Quality Criteria for 
Protection of Human Health--Methylmercury; Notice of Reopening to 
Public Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of reopening to public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public that the period for the 
submission of scientific and technical information for the development 
of the revised Ambient Water Quality Criterion for Methylmercury is 
extended.

DATES: The comment period has been extended fifteen days to November 
27, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send an original and three copies of any written significant 
scientific information to W-00-29 Comment Clerk, Water Docket, Ariel 
Rios 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460. Comments may 
be hand-delivered to the Water Docket, Room EB57, 401 M Street, SW, 
Washington, D.C. 20460. Issues may also be submitted electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4ebf389e0cbc7cfc1d0e4c1d4c58ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2edf58fe6cdc1c9c7d6e2c7d2c38cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>. Information should be submitted as a WP5.1, 6.1 and/
or 8.0 or an ASCII file with no form of encryption.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary Manibusan, Health and 
Ecological Criteria Division (4304), US EPA, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20460; (202) 260-3688; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98f5f9f6f1faedebf9f6b6f5f9eae1d8fde8f9b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e08d818e89829593818ece8d819299a0859081ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Environmental Protection Agency 
published in the Federal Register of October 12, 2000 (65 FR 60664), 
that scientific and technical information that pertains to the 
development of a revised Ambient Water Quality Criterion for 
Methylmercury should be received within 30 days of the Federal Register 
publication date of October 12, 2000. In response to public interest, 
the Environmental Protection Agency has granted a fifteen day extension 
to the public comment period.

Geoffrey H. Grubbs,
Director, Office of Science and Technology.
[FR Doc. 00-29504 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70336-70337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA01-1-000]


Central Maine Power Company; Notice of Filing

November 16, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Central Maine Power Company 
(CMP) tendered for filing, pursuant to Section 37.4(c) of the Code of 
Federal Regulations, 18 CFR 37.4(c), the revised Standards of Conduct 
to be followed by CMP personnel.
    CMP requests that the Standards of Conduct become effective on 
November 10, 2000.

[[Page 70337]]

    CMP served copies of the filing upon the Maine Public Utilities 
Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before December 1, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc/fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29853 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Official Journal L 82I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 082I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6319 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 082I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6319 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/414 of 19 March 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/570 as regards medical stockpiling rescEU capacities
  (notified under document C(2020) 1827)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/414 of 19 March 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/570 as regards medical stockpiling rescEU capacities
  (notified under document C(2020) 1827)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 1827)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN FRANCIS, §

Movant, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1768-X-BH

§

FNU LNU §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections 

thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion 

that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the 

Findings and Conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE.

SIGNED this 18th day of July, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-01768-X-BK Document 9 Filed 07/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
#### O. S. VAUGHN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22504.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 17, 1943.

Eugene Talbert, of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s .Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

On a plea of guilty before the court appellant was. convicted of felony theft and his punishment assessed at three years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Since his appeal was perfected, appellant has filed his application, duly verified, asking the privilege of withdrawing the same. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
#### BOATMAN v. C. S. HAMILTON MOTOR CO.

No. 13021.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

May 30, 1941.

Jas. D. O’Connor, of Dallas, for appellant.

Bromberg, Leftwich, Carrington & Gow-an, of Dallas, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude the action of the trial court in rendering judgment for plaintiff non obstante .veredicto was correct; defendant having waived her right to rescind as a matter of law. J. B. Colt Co. v. Head et al., Tex.Com.App., 292 S.W. 198. Likewise, her alternative suit for damages was waived, absent jury issues and findings on this phase of her cross action. All assignments and propositions have been fully considered, are overruled, and this cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KIMBERLY TAYLOR, §

PLAINTIFF, §

 §

V. § CASE NO. 3:22-CV-1033-E-BK

 §

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY §

ADMINISTRATION, §

DEFENDANT. §

FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Special Order 3, this cause is now before the Court 

on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 

Doc. 27. It is recommended that the motion be GRANTED.

Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), a court must award attorney’s fees and 

expenses if: (1) the claimant is a “prevailing party,” (2) the position of the United States was not 

“substantially justified,” and (3) there are no special circumstances that make an award unjust. 

28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A); Sims v. Apfel, 238 F.3d 597, 599-600 (5th Cir. 2001). The award of 

attorney’s fees must be reasonable. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b).

Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $8,488.84 and reimbursement 

of the $402.00 filing fee. Doc. 27 at 6. Having considered Plaintiff’s motion and the applicable

law, the Court finds Plaintiff’s request reasonable and recommends that Plaintiff’s Application 

for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Doc. 35, be GRANTED in the amount

of $8,890.84. 

EAJA awards are payable directly to the prevailing party, not their attorney. Astrue v. 

Case 3:22-cv-01033-E-BK Document 28 Filed 07/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 3584
2

Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 592-93 (2010); Jackson v. Astrue, 705 F.3d 527, 531 n.11 (5th Cir. 2013). 

Accordingly, the award of attorney’s fees should be made payable directly to Plaintiff but sent in 

care of her attorney. Id.

SO RECOMMENDED on July 11, 2023.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE AND

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL/OBJECT

A copy of this report and recommendation will be served on all parties in the manner provided 

by law. Any party who objects to any part of this report and recommendation must file specific 

written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 

FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). An objection must identify the finding or recommendation to which 

objection is made, the basis for the objection, and the place in the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation the disputed determination is found. An objection that merely incorporates by 

reference or refers to the briefing before the magistrate judge is not specific. Failure to file 

specific written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and 

legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except 

upon grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th 

Cir. 1996), modified by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections to 14 days). 

Case 3:22-cv-01033-E-BK Document 28 Filed 07/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 3585
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,137
<SECURITIES>                                     4,794
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,922
<PP&E>                                          53,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,098
<SALES>                                         26,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,867
<CGS>                                           21,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,540
<INCOME-TAX>                                       555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                985
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
### Contents of CD Test Type Report # 1-hr LC50 screen Dupont 26135 4-hr LC50 DuPont 17743-721 Cardiac sensitization DuPont 17743-1522 Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) DuPont 17743-501 In vitro chromosome aberration DuPont 17743-546 Pilot study for 4-hr LC50 DuPont 19179-700 Test Type Report # 2-hr Approximate lethal concentration (ALC) DuPont 2 1871 4-hr LC50 DuPont 26154 RV1 Cardiac sensitization DuPont 25453 Dermal irritation DuPont 22199 Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) DuPont 22597 In vitro chomosome aberration DuPont 22598 5-day inhalation range-finder DuPont 25309 28-day inhalation DuPont 25850 90-day inhalation DuPont 17453-785 Pre-natal development DuPont 17453-731 90-day inhalation NA In vivo micronucleus NA Ready biodegradability** A100560*** Partition coefficient** A100561*** Algae growth inhibition test** - Fish acute toxicity test** - Daphnia acute immobilization test** - Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) DuPont 20711

Service Contract on Management of Construction and Demolition Waste-SR1 http://eu-smr.eu/cdw/docs/BIO_Construction%20and%20Demolition%20Waste_Final%20report_09022011.pdf

Completed Studies CAS RN 66711-86-2

Completed Studies CAS RN 692-49-9

On-going Studies CAS RN 692-49-9

Completed Studies CAS RN 407-60-3
# Official Journal L 265/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.265.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 265 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5529 September 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.265.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 265

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5529 September 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.