alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Security Tenor Announcement Date Auction Date Settlement Date 

4-Week Bill 28 days Monday, October 01, 2018 Tuesday, October 02, 2018 Thursday, October 04, 2018 

8-Week Bill N/A N/A N/A N/A 4-Week Bill 28 days Thursday, October 04, 2018 Tuesday, October 09, 2018 Thursday, October 11, 2018 8-Week Bill N/A N/A N/A N/A 4-Week Bill 28 days Monday, October 15, 2018 Tuesday, October 16, 2018 Thursday, October 18, 2018 8-Week Bill 54 days Monday, October 15, 2018 Tuesday, October 16, 2018 Thursday, October 18, 2018 

4-Week Bill 29 days Monday, October 22, 2018 Tuesday, October 23, 2018 Thursday, October 25, 2018 

8-Week Bill 54 days Monday, October 22, 2018 Tuesday, October 23, 2018 Thursday, October 25, 2018 

4-Week Bill 28 days Monday, October 29, 2018 Tuesday, October 30, 2018 Thursday, November 01, 2018 

8-Week Bill 55 days Monday, October 29, 2018 Tuesday, October 30, 2018 Thursday, November 01, 2018 

4-Week Bill 28 days Monday, November 05, 2018 Tuesday, November 06, 2018 Thursday, November 08, 2018 

8-Week Bill 55 days Monday, November 05, 2018 Tuesday, November 06, 2018 Thursday, November 08, 2018 

4-Week Bill 26 days Thursday, November 08, 2018 Tuesday, November 13, 2018 Thursday, November 15, 2018 

8-Week Bill 54 days Thursday, November 08, 2018 Tuesday, November 13, 2018 Thursday, November 15, 2018 

4-Week Bill 25 days Monday, November 19, 2018 Tuesday, November 20, 2018 Friday, November 23, 2018 

8-Week Bill 53 days Monday, November 19, 2018 Tuesday, November 20, 2018 Friday, November 23, 2018 

4-Week Bill 27 days Monday, November 26, 2018 Tuesday, November 27, 2018 Thursday, November 29, 2018 

8-Week Bill 54 days Monday, November 26, 2018 Tuesday, November 27, 2018 Thursday, November 29, 2018 

4-Week Bill 27 days Monday, December 03, 2018 Tuesday, December 04, 2018 Thursday, December 06, 2018 

8-Week Bill 54 days Monday, December 03, 2018 Tuesday, December 04, 2018 Thursday, December 06, 2018 

4-Week Bill 28 days Wednesday, December 05, 2018 Thursday, December 06, 2018 Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8-Week Bill 56 days Wednesday, December 05, 2018 Thursday, December 06, 2018 Tuesday, December 11, 2018 

4-Week Bill 28 days Tuesday, December 11, 2018 Thursday, December 13, 2018 Tuesday, December 18, 2018 

8-Week Bill 56 days Tuesday, December 11, 2018 Thursday, December 13, 2018 Tuesday, December 18, 2018 

4-Week Bill 27 days Tuesday, December 18, 2018 Thursday, December 20, 2018 Wednesday, December 26, 2018 

8-Week Bill 55 days Tuesday, December 18, 2018 Thursday, December 20, 2018 Wednesday, December 26, 2018 

4-Week Bill 27 days Monday, December 24, 2018 Thursday, December 27, 2018 Wednesday, January 02, 2019 

8-Week Bill 55 days Monday, December 24, 2018 Thursday, December 27, 2018 Wednesday, January 02, 2019 

4-Week Bill 28 days Monday, December 31, 2018 Thursday, January 03, 2019 Tuesday, January 08, 2019 8-Week Bill 56 days Monday, December 31, 2018 Thursday, January 03, 2019 Tuesday, January 08, 2019 

Tentative Auction Schedule of 1-Month & 2-Month Transition Period
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00028-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF L.A.

On Appeal from the County Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. M15-00051

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

L.A. appeals from a June 9, 2015, order committing him to a state mental health facility

for extended in-patient mental health services not to exceed ninety days.1 L.A.’s notice of appeal 

was filed June 11, the clerk’s record was filed June 16, and no reporter’s record is to be filed in 

this matter.2 The Texas Health and Safety Code requires that mental health commitment appeals 

be given absolute priority over all other cases and authorizes this Court to adjust the briefing 

deadlines and docketing timetables to achieve that end. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 

§ 574.070(e) (West 2010).

Due to the accelerated nature of this appeal, we establish the following briefing schedule 

for this matter: (1) the appellant’s brief to be received by this Court on or before June 26, 2015, 

and (2) the appellee’s brief to be received by this Court on or before July 3, 2015. See id. No 

extensions of time will be granted.

The parties are further notified that, pursuant to Section 574.070(e) of the Texas Health 

and Safety Code, the case will be submitted, without oral argument, to the panel of Chief Justice 

 

1L.A. appeals from a contemporaneously entered order authorizing the administration of psychoactive medication 

under our cause number 06-15-00029-CV.

2Based on a letter from court reporter Jana Atchison Rushing contained in the clerk’s record, it appears that an effort 

was made to create a record in this case by electronically recording the trial court proceedings. L.A. apparently 

requested the transcription of a small, but specific, excerpt of those proceedings, and Hopkins County retained Rushing 

to transcribe the requested portions. However, after Rushing reviewed the audio storage devices provided to her by 

the county, she discovered that the portion of the proceedings requested by L.A. had not been captured. Rushing 

informed L.A. of the issue and advised that no reporter’s record would be prepared unless and until he made a further 

request for the transcription of other portions of the proceedings that actually had been recorded. We are aware of no 

further request submitted to Rushing, and, to date, we have received no motion or other request for assistance with 

respect to the reporter’s record.
3

Josh R. Morriss, III, Justice Bailey C. Moseley, and Justice Ralph K. Burgess one day after the 

appellee’s brief is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: June 17, 2015
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1023

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of the vessel PLAY PRETTY

for employment in the coastwise trade of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To clear certain impediments to the licensing of the vessel

PLAY PRETTY for employment in the coastwise trade

of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding section 12106 of title 46, United

4 States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act,

5 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Secretary of the depart6 ment in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue

7 a certificate of documentation for the vessel PLAY PRET8 TY (official number 975346) authorizing the vessel to en9 gage in the coastwise trade of the United States.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-035-Y 

 § 

JOSEPH EANES (3) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 15, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00035-Y Document 84 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 191
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7353
ANTHONY F. MAZZA, JR., Petitioner - Appellant,
v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:07-cv-00075-MHL) Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 26, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony F. Mazza, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* This case was decided by the magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony F. Mazza, Jr., seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. *The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Mazza has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth in Item1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for theNational Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and for theyear ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certainservicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible forthe Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20318-9999

CM-0129-14
7 May 2014

MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDANT, JOINT FORCES STAFF COLLEGE

SUBJECT: Process for Accreditation of Joint Education for the Joint and Combined
Warfighting School and the Joint Advanced Warfighting School

1, The Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS) program accreditation is reaffirmed for
6 years. The Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS) program accreditation is reaffirmed
for 2 years. Joint Forces Staff College (JFSC) is authorized to grant Joint Professional Military
Education II credit to JCWS graduates through 31 March 2020 and to JAWS graduates through
31 March 2016. Attached are the Process for Accreditation of Joint Education team’s reports
and certificates of accreditation.

2. I greatly appreciate the dedicated efforts of the JESC faculty and staff in presenting a
curriculum that imparts a joint perspective. Their work helps ensure that we are developing agile
and adaptive leaders with the requisite values and critical thinking skills necessary to keep pace
with the changing strategic environment.

Mats PP

MARTIN E. DEMPSEY
General, U.S. Army

Attachments:
As stated


Chairman of the Joint Chiets of Staff
Recognises

Joint Forces Staff College

Joint and Combined Warfighting School

as an accredited Phase II program for
Joint Professional Military Education

Expires 31 March 2020

Wwt2T Quip

Date Chairman of the Joint Chie of aft
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|East Coast (PADD 1) Crude Oil Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|East Coast (PADD 1) Crude Oil Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 9     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
Case 5:22-cv-00234-H Document 31 Filed 01/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 135
Agenda -- May 2007 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings April 26, 2007 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 p.m. on 

Wednesday, April 25 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and Amelia.Moncayo@ny.frb.org. 

Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still 

appreciated. 

I. Borrowing Estimates Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

Low/High 

April-June / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

July-September / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

FY 2007 / 

FY 2008 / 

III. Quarterly Note Issuance 

3-year note / 

10-year note / 

30-year bond reopening / 

10-year note reopening / 

2-year note May/Jun/Jul / / / / - / / 

5-year note May/Jun/Jul / / / / - / / 

10-year TIPS / 

20-year TIPS reopening / 

(Please provide your estimates in the format provided above with central estimates followed by low/high estimates for each issue) 

Discussion Topics 

1. Given your assessments of budget projections and the economic outlook, please discuss the 

suitability of Treasury’s current financing schedule given your expectations of financing needs 

going forward.

2. Recent press reports and other anecdotal evidence suggest elevated levels of secondary 

market trading of Treasury securities in the first quarter of 2007. Can you comment on the 

nature of and the motivation for this increased activity and the likelihood of it continuing? Can 

you remark on trends in trading activity occurring via electronic platforms and in the over-thecounter market and what impact these trends have on the Treasury market? 
3. As we communicated last quarter, Treasury continues to develop an enhanced Treasury 

auction system. As we move toward implementation, are you similarly preparing for 

functionality testing and an internal review of processes and systems to ensure a smooth 

transition to the new system?
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 6, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16- 1007

Lower Tribunal No. 85

- 25037

________________



### Samuel Riv era,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Victoria R.

Brennan, Judge.

Samuel Rivera, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.On July 5, 2017, this Court issued an order granting the State of Florida’s

motion to dismiss Appellant Samuel Rivera’s “Notice for Belated Appeal Nunc

Pro Tunc Motion,” which had sought to advance Rivera’s continuing and repetitive

efforts to overturn his 1987 convictions for first degree murder and armed robbery.

Contained within the Court’s order was an order to show cause why Rivera should

not be prohibited from filing with this Court any pro se appeals, petitions, motions,

or other proceedings related to his criminal sentencing in circuit court case number

85-25037.

Rivera’s August 4, 2017 response to our show cause order introduces no

new argument or information for our consideration. We conclude that Rivera has

not demonstrated good cause to justify further pleadings with this Court, absent the

participation of an attorney to represent him.

The access to courts provision of the Florida Constitution

– Article I, section

21

– provides an avenue for an incarcerated person in Florida to challenge the legal

basis of his or her incarceration; however, this constitutional right may be forfeited

if that person abuses the judicial process. Jimenez v. State

, 196 So. 3d 499, 501

(Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Our responsibility is to balance the incarcerated person’s

right to access to courts with the need of this Court to devote its finite resources to

legitimate appeals and petitions. State v. Spencer

, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).

Accordingly, after notice in the form of an order to show cause and an opportunity

2for the incarcerated person to respond, a court may prevent further filings. Id. ; see

also Whipple v. State

, 112 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Because we conclude that Rivera has not demonstrated good cause to justify

further pro se filings of appeals, petitions, motions, or other proceedings with this

Court, we direct the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal to refuse to accept

from Rivera further pro se filings related to circuit court case number 85-25037;

provided, however, that the Clerk may accept filings related to case number 85-

25037 if such filings have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a

licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing.

Any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by Rivera will subject him

to sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida

Department of Corrections for consideration by it for disciplinary action, pursuant

to section 944.279(1) of the Florida Statutes.

Order issued.

3