alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00149-CR

Randall Eugene Brooks

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (0386824D)

June 4, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the North Dakota Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 7, 2000, at the Radisson, 201 5th Street North, Fargo, North Dakota 58102. The purpose of the meeting is to review recent local and statewide developments regarding civil rights issues/enforcement and to discuss the impact of the Committee report, “Civil Rights Enforcement Issues in North Dakota.” 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact John Dulles, Director of the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 303-866-1040 (TDD 303-866-1049). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, November 15, 2000. 

Edward A. Hailes, Jr., 

Acting General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 00-29869 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# C_2022129EN.01001601.xml

| 22.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/16

---

NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS

Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director for Disaster Preparedness and Prevention in the Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (grade AD 14)

(COM/2022/10412)

(2022/C 129/07)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2022/10412) for the function of Director for Disaster Preparedness and Prevention in the Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (grade AD 14).

To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!P4bcyC

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rocco Villani, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), rendered September 23, 1988, convicting him of forgery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32



DIGITAL LIFESTYLES GROUP, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS

(Furnished
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Digital Lifestyles Group, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



November 15, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ KENT A. SAVAGE     
|Kent A. Savage         
|Chief Executive Officer



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ THEODORE B. MUFTIC                    
|Theodore B. Muftic                        
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The forgoing certification is being
furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 409

Designating October 23, 1994, through October 31, 1994, as ‘‘National

Red Ribbon Week for a Drug-Free America’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1994

Mr. TALENT introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating October 23, 1994, through October 31, 1994,

as ‘‘National Red Ribbon Week for a Drug-Free America’’.

Whereas substance abuse has reached epidemic proportions

and is of major concern to all Americans;

Whereas substance abuse is a major public health threat and

is one of the major causes of preventable disease, disability, and death in the United States today;

Whereas illegal drug use is not limited to persons of a particular age, gender, or socioeconomic status;
2

•HJ 409 IH

Whereas the drug problem appears to be insurmountable, but

the United States has begun to lay the foundation to

combat the use of illegal drugs;

Whereas the United States must continue the important

strides made to combat substance abuse;

Whereas it has been demonstrated through public opinion

polls that the American people consider drug abuse one

of the most serious domestic problems facing the United

States and have begun to take steps against it;

Whereas the National Family Partnership has declared October 23, 1994, through October 31, 1994, as ‘‘National

Red Ribbon Week’’, has organized the National Red Ribbon Celebration to coordinate the week’s activities, has

established the theme, ‘‘Healthy Means Drug Free’’ for

the week, and has called for a comprehensive public

awareness, prevention, and education program involving

thousands of parent and community groups across the

country;

Whereas any use of an illegal drug is unacceptable and the

illegal use of a legal drug cannot be tolerated; and

Whereas substance abuse destroys lives, spawns crime, undermines our economy, and threatens our security as a Nation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That—

4 (1) October 23, 1994, through October 31,

5 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Red Ribbon Week

6 for a Drug-Free America’’;
3

•HJ 409 IH

1 (2) the President is authorized and directed to

2 issue a proclamation calling on the people of the

3 United States—

4 (A) to observe the week by holding con5 ferences, meetings and other activities to sup6 port community education, and with other ap7 propriate activities, events and educational cam8 paigns; and

9 (B) both during the week and thereafter,

10 to wear and display red ribbons to present and

11 symbolize commitment to a healthy, drug-free

12 life style, and to develop an attitude of intoler13 ance concerning the use of drugs; and

14 (3) Congress recognizes and commends the

15 hard work and dedication of concerned parents,

16 youth, law enforcement officials, educators, business

17 leaders, religious leaders, private sector organiza18 tions, and Government leaders in combating sub19 stance abuse.

Æ
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 1ST QUARTER 2019*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE** AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 2-MO 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 12/27 12/31 1/3 40.00 30.00 39.00 36.00 26.00 180.00 -9.00

2/3/6/12 MO BILLS 1/3 1/7 1/10 40.00 30.00 39.00 36.00 160.00 -15.00

1/10 1/14 1/17 40.00 30.00 39.00 36.00 160.00 -15.00

1/17 1/20 1/24 40.00 30.00 42.00 39.00 160.00 -9.00

1/24 1/28 1/31 44.00 35.00 42.00 39.00 26.00 180.00 6.00

1/31 2/4 2/7 40.00 35.00 42.00 45.00 160.00 2.00

2/7 2/11 2/14 35.00 35.00 42.00 45.00 160.00 -3.00

2/14 2/18 2/21 35.00 35.00 45.00 45.00 157.00 3.00

2/21 2/25 2/28 35.00 35.00 47.00 45.00 26.00 180.00 8.00

2/28 3/4 3/7 50.00 40.00 47.00 48.00 151.00 34.00

3/7 3/11 3/14 50.00 40.00 50.00 48.00 146.00 42.00

3/14 3/18 3/21 50.00 40.00 50.00 48.00 146.00 42.00

3/21 3/25 3/28 55.00 40.00 50.00 49.00 26.00 175.00 45.00

2246.00 2115.00 131.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 1/3 1/8 1/15 38.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 1/3 1/9 1/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 1/3 1/10 1/15 16.00 0.00 39.22 38.78

10-year TIPS 1/10 1/17 1/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 1/24 1/28 1/31 40.00 0.00

2-year FRN 1/24 1/29 1/31 20.00 1.00

5-year note 1/24 1/28 1/31 41.00 0.00

7-year note 1/24 1/29 1/31 32.00 0.00 121.53 24.47

3-year Note 1/30 2/5 2/15 38.00 0.00

10-year Note 1/30 2/6 2/15 27.00 0.00

30-year Bond 1/30 2/7 2/15 19.00 0.00 54.13 29.87

30-year TIPS 2/7 2/13 2/28 8.00 1.00

2-year note 2/21 2/25 2/28 40.00 0.00

5-year note 2/21 2/25 2/28 41.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 2/21 2/26 2/28 18.00 0.00

7-year note 2/21 2/26 2/28 32.00 0.00 81.58 57.42

3-year Note 3/7 3/11 3/15 38.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 3/7 3/12 3/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 3/7 3/13 3/15 16.00 0.00 24.00 54.00

10-year TIPS (r) 3/14 3/21 3/29 11.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 3/21 2/27 3/29 18.00 0.00 0.00 29.00

554.00 320.46 233.54

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 365

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future. Hi :)

** Settlement date does not yet reflect a proposed shift to an alternative bill settlement cycle
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7345

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LOFTON HOWARD LAMBERT, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (CR-93-5)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lofton Howard Lambert, III, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lofton Howard Lambert, III, appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Lambert, No. CA-93-5 (W.D. Va. Aug. 27, 1998). We

deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10QSB for quarterly period
ended June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                      1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                      240,292
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            247,635
<PP&E>                                      131,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              780,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (595,959)
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                    (32,158)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                1,665,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (780,366)
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            133,220
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (706,947)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (87,478)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (573,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (573,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (573,727)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.19)







</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated September 29, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-206447) of Smart Trust,
Argus Dividend Growers Total Return Trust, Series 6.


 


	 	/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


September 29, 2015
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dale R. Black., the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                 
|                     |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                     
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.         
|                     | 
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                 
|                     |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                     
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.
|                     | 
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ DALE R. BLACK                                                                                 
|                     |  | Dale R. Black                                                                                     
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.
Order entered January 24, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01271-CV

ROBERT J. SHUMAKE, Appellant

V.

LUIS BARBOSA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-04425-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 22, 2020 first motion for extension of time to file 

his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than February 24, 

2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 21, 2013

NO. 03-12-00521-CV

Tony Davis, Appellant

v.

Deutsche Bank National Trust; Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital 1, Inc.;

Saxon Mortgage, Inc.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS);

John Cottrell; and Locke, Lord & Bissell, Attorneys at Law, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay 

for the clerk’s record; has not submitted a status report regarding this appeal, and, accordingly, 

has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that 

the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. IT IS FURTHER ordered that the appellant 

pay all costs relating to this appeal both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-301-Y 

 § 

JESUS ALONSO FRANCO PENA (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED December 15, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00301-Y Document 63 Filed 12/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 131
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139875 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139875 

 COA: 293413 

Oakland CC: 2008-223260-FH 

AMYDORTHY RENEEMARIE WHITE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Allen Richman, Appellant, v Board of Assessment of Town of Pamelia, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record reveals that the assessment roll involving the subject property was completed and filed on or before July 1, 1989. The 30-day Statute of Limitations for commencement of a review of that assessment *(see,*Real Property Tax Law § 702 [2]) expired on Monday, July 31, 1989. Therefore, service of the notice and petition on August 1, 1989 was untimely, and the petition should have been dismissed based upon the Statute of Limitations defense *(see, Samuels v Town of Clarkson,*91 AD2d 836). In view of this holding, it is unnecessary to reach the other issue raised on appeal. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Inglehart, J.—tax certiorari.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.