alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 3, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Philip A. Grybas      |   |
|-------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|              |   | Philip A. Grybas,         |
|              |   | Senior Vice President and |
|              |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to SureWest Communications and will be retained by SureWestCommunications and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be consideredfiled as part of the Form 10-Q.

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSEPH WASHAWITZ , Appellant,

v.

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1420

[ March 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Cymonie Rowe , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CA

- 014467

- XXXX

- MB

.
Joseph Washawitz, South Bay, pro se.

Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , T AY LOR and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 387

To designate the second week of August 1994 as ‘‘National U.S. Seafood

Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 1994

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the second week of August 1994 as ‘‘National

U.S. Seafood Week’’.

Whereas seafood is an important natural resource commercially harvested from the waters of every region of the

United States;

Whereas an increasing amount of seafood is also available

through United States aquaculture production;

Whereas the United States seafood industry provides hundreds of thousands of jobs and includes fish harvesters,

growers, processors, managers, biologists, shipbuilders

and suppliers, shippers, carriers, marketing personnel,

wholesale and retail sellers, grocers and others;
2

HJ 387 IH

Whereas the buying and consumption of American seafood

products boosts our national economy and supports the

‘‘Made in the USA’’ theme;

Whereas seafood is one of the healthiest forms of protein,

and is low in calories, fat and cholesterol;

Whereas seafood is being processed in increasingly creative

forms to provide a vast market and a great variety of

products;

Whereas each United States citizen consumes an average of

15 pounds of seafood annually, while citizens of some

other industrialized fishing countries each consume over

50 pounds of seafood annually;

Whereas the United States harvests and produces 10 billion

pounds of seafood annually;

Whereas the United States is the largest exporter of seafood

in the world, but also the second largest importer of seafood, and domestic seafood which could be consumed by

United States citizens is being exported to other countries;

Whereas the average American consumer will unknowingly

purchase foreign seafood due to a lack of awareness

about the availability and superior quality of domestic

seafood;

Whereas competition in the world seafood market has increased, in part due to the subsidization of foreign seafood industries, particularly foreign aquaculture;

Whereas domestic seafood is one of the Nation’s most valuable sustainable natural resources; and
3

HJ 387 IH

Whereas the United States could become a much healthier

nation simply by eating a better diet, including eating

more domestic seafood: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the second week of August 1994 be designated as

4 ‘‘National U.S. Seafood Week’’. The President is author5 ized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon

6 the people of the United States to observe the week with

7 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
#### Ruben MERRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22110.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1942.

H. S. Beard, of Waco, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of five years in the penitentiary on a charge of robbery and perfected his appeal to this court. Subsequently he has filed a verified application to withdraw his.appeal.

The application is granted and the appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
10.2


 


Loan Agreement Summary


 


		1.	Lender and borrower:



 


	Borrower: 	Weifang Lakeland Safety Products Co., Ltd. (“WF”)
	Lender:   	Chinese Rural Credit Cooperative Bank (“CRCCB”)


 


		2.	The borrowing amounts limit: RMB 8 million, WF can select the borrowing amounts within RMB 8 million
(approximately USD $1,300,000).



 


		3.	Borrowing method: Trading financial, WF mortgaged inventory valued RMB 18,291,748 to the bank.
The bank hired a professional firm to supervise WF’s inventory flow, which WF will pay at a yearly rate of RMB 46,000.



 


		4.	Interests: Interest based on 120% of the benchmark rate. The annum interest rate is 5.52%. Monthly
interest is RMB 36,800 which will be paid monthly.



 


		5.	Borrowing period: up to six months. The longest borrowing period is six months beginning September
21, 2015 and ending March 18, 2016.
#### Margene Welch RUST, Individually and as Guardian of Margene A. Rust, Petitioner, v. George Foster RUST and Armistead Dudley Rust, Independent Executors and Trustees Under the Will of the Estate of John Y. Rust, Jr., Deceased, et al., Respondents.

No. A-1728.

Supreme Court of Texas.

*Nov. 3,*1948.

Neill & Lewis and Robt. T. Neill, both of San Angelo, for petitioners.

Upton, Upton & Baker and Travis E. Baker, all of San Angelo, P. R. Rowe, Jr., T. J. Arnold, W. C. Williamson, Gannon & Port and Gauis G. Gannon, all of Houston, and C. T. Dalton, Guardian Ad Litem, of San Angelo1, for respondents.

FOLLEY, Justice.

This is a suit to construe the will of John Y. Rust, Jr., to determine whether the provisions thereof disposing of the residuary estate violate Art. I, Sec. 26 of the Constitution of Texas, Vernon’s Ann. St., condemning perpetuities. The trial court upheld all provisions of the will and rendered judgment accordingly. The Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, in a very able opinion by Honorable James W. McClend-on, Chief Justice, affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 211 S.W.2d 262. ITaving reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we have concluded that we erred in granting the application for a writ of error. We approve the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals and find it unnecessary to write further on the question.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, affirming that of the trial court, is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

DONNA F., §

PLAINTIFF, §

 §

V. § CASE NO. 3:22-CV-690-S-BK

 §

COMMISSIONER OF THE §

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, §

DEFENDANT. §

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Special Order 3, Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney 

Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Doc. 18, is before the Court for the issuance of 

findings and a recommended disposition. For the reasons that follow, the application should be 

GRANTED.

Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), a court must award attorneys’ fees and 

expenses if: (1) the claimant is a “prevailing party,” (2) the position of the United States was not 

“substantially justified,” and (3) there are no special circumstances that make an award unjust. 

28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A); Sims v. Apfel, 238 F.3d 597, 599-600 (5th Cir. 2001). The award of 

attorneys’ fees must be reasonable. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b).

Plaintiff seeks $9,271.01 in attorneys’ fees plus $402.00 in court costs. Doc. 32 at 7. 

Having considered Plaintiff’s unopposed application and the applicable law, the Court finds the 

request reasonable. Thus, Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to 

Justice Act, Doc. 32, should be GRANTED in the amount of $9,673.01.

Case 3:22-cv-00690-S-BK Document 20 Filed 01/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1034
2

EAJA awards are payable directly to the prevailing party, not the attorney. Astrue v. 

Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 592-93 (2010). Accordingly, the award here should be made payable 

directly to Plaintiff but sent in care of her attorney. Jackson v. Astrue, 705 F.3d 527, 531 n.11 

(5th Cir. 2013).

SO RECOMMENDED on January 2, 2024.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE AND

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL/OBJECT

A copy of this report and recommendation will be served on all parties in the manner 

provided by law. Any party who objects to any part of this report and recommendation must file 

specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). An objection must identify the finding or recommendation to 

which objection is made, state the basis for the objection, and indicate where in the magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation the disputed determination is found. An objection that merely 

incorporates by reference or refers to the briefing before the magistrate judge is not specific. 

Failure to file specific written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual 

findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district 

court, except upon grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 

1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996), modified by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending 

the time to file objections to 14 days).

Case 3:22-cv-00690-S-BK Document 20 Filed 01/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1035
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CHARLES EDWARD SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-CV-0753-P

FROT WORTH CITY HALL,

Defendant.

ORDER

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, 

and a Recommendation in this case. ECF No. 9. No objections were filed, 

and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The 

District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District 

Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. 

The Court therefore ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED 

without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED on this 28th day of November 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00753-P Document 10 Filed 11/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 27
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Zimbler, the Chief Executive Officer of Steam Cleaning USA, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 19, 2003

/S/ James W. Zimbler
------------------------------
James W. Zimbler
President




<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALISHA GAMBRELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 422 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALISHA GAMBRELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 423 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of April, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Official Journal C 48/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 48 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5811 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 48

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5811 February 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 048/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7491 — Lixil/Grohe) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 048/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7401 — Blackstone/Alliance BV/Alliance Automotive Group) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 048/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7491 — Lixil/Grohe) (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 048/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7401 — Blackstone/Alliance BV/Alliance Automotive Group) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 048/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2015/C 048/04 | Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on ‘A new era for aviation — Opening the aviation market to the civil use of remotely piloted aircraft systems in a safe and sustainable manner’ | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 048/03

Euro exchange rates

2

European Data Protection Supervisor

2015/C 048/04

Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on ‘A new era for aviation — Opening the aviation market to the civil use of remotely piloted aircraft systems in a safe and sustainable manner’

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
  (1)  The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, as amended and as supplemented by the 2015-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of June 24, 2015 (as supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as titling trust, NILT Trust, as UTI beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and
 (2)  To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  rd
 /s/ Mark KaczynskiMark KaczynskiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 23
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valrico Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John E. "Bob" Mclean, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ John E. "Bob" Mclean
President and CEO
November 10th, 2003
# White Paper Comments

Attached please find comments regarding the “White Papers on Methane and VOC Emissions” Posted by U.S. EPA at http://www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/whit epapers.html on April 15, 2014 by the Pennsylvania Independent Oil and Gas Association (PIOGA). Thank you. 

### Roy Rakiewicz Senior Consultant All4 Inc. 2393 Kimberton Road — P.O. Box 299 Kimberton, PA 19442­0299 p: 610.933.5246 x 127 — f: 610.933.5127 rrakiewicz@all4inc.com www.all4inc.com Are you following us? LinkedIn | Facebook| Twitter Have you checked out ALL4’s Blogthis week? 

### Rakiewicz <rrakiewicz@ALL4INC.COM> Roy Mon 6/16/2014 6:50 PM
To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Cusano, Ronald (RCusano@schnader.com) <RCusano@schn ader.com>; 

###  1 attachment Letter.pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 White Paper Comments** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/**  **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 72-6 Filed 03/11/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 863
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 72-6 Filed 03/11/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 864
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 72-6 Filed 03/11/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 865
Order entered January 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01229-CR

VICKY RENEE MILLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-81422-2012

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# Official Journal L 237/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 237 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 578 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 237

English edition

Legislation

Volume 578 August 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 23 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of reversing and manoeuvring lamps for power-driven vehicles and their trailers | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 46 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of devices for indirect vision and of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of these devices | 24 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 23 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of reversing and manoeuvring lamps for power-driven vehicles and their trailers

1

*

Regulation No 46 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of devices for indirect vision and of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of these devices

24

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 340

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that no person born to parents who are unlawfully in the United States

at the time of the birth shall be a United States citizen on account

of birth in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1994

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. SOLOMON) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that no person born to parents who

are unlawfully in the United States at the time of the

birth shall be a United States citizen on account of

birth in the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con-
2

•HJ 340 IH

1 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

2 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

3 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

4 States within seven years after the date of its submission

5 to the States for ratification:

6 ‘‘ARTICLE —

7 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person born in the United States

8 after the date of the ratification of this article shall be

9 a citizen of the United States, or of any State, on account

10 of birth in the United States unless the mother or father

11 of the person is a citizen of the United States, is lawfully

12 in the United States, or has a lawful status under the im13 migration laws of the United States, at the time of the

14 birth.

15 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en16 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ