alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MITCHELL v. STATE.

No. 21199.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1940.

On Rehearing Jan. 15, 1941.

David E. O’Fiel, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for theft of cattle, punishment assessed at ten years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before the court without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing of a procedural nature is presented for review. However, it appears *508that the court overlooked giving effect to the indeterminate sentence law as provided by Art. 775, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. art. 775. The sentence is amended to direct that the punishment be confinement in the penitentiary for not less than two nor more than ten years.

As thus amended the judgment is affirmed.

On State’s Motion for Rehearing

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge'.

Conviction was for cattle theft, with punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

At a former day of the present term, to-wit, on November 6, 1940, a judgment of affirmance was entered. In a motion filed December 12, 1940, the representative of the State calls attention to the fact that no notice of appeal appears in the transcript forwarded to this court, and, therefore, the court was without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

The motion of the State is granted, the judgment of affirmance is set aside, the mandate of this court reflecting said judgment is recalled, and the appeal is now dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

____________________________________ 

) 

GREGORY CHARLES KRUG, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 10-02069 (ABJ) 

) 

JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., et al., ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on December 3, 2010. 

The Court will dismiss the complaint sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary in Salters, South Carolina suing the 

nine justices of the United States Supreme Court seeking damages for the justices’ alleged failure 

to recuse themselves from considering a petition for a writ of certiorari that plaintiff filed in 

2009. Compl ¶ 7. This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions of the 

Supreme Court. In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1992). Denial of a petition for writ of 

certiorari is a judicial action and the Supreme Court justices are absolutely immune from 

liability. Reddy v. O’Connor, 520 F. Supp. 2d 124, 130 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Sindram v. Suda, 

986 F.2d 1459 (D.C. Cir. 1993). 

                                                            

1 “If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court 

must dismiss the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 
2 

Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this 

Memorandum Opinion. 

 /s/ 

AMY BERMAN JACKSON 

United States District Judge 

DATE: June 13, 2011
Agenda – November 2013 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – October 31-November 1, 2013 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, October 28, 2013 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov , ezechiel.copic@ny.frb.org, michael.mcmorrow@ny.frb.org, meghana.reddy@ny.frb.org, 

and jasmine.surpris@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses 

are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

 Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 Low/High 

 October-December 2013 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 January-March 2014 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 FY 2014 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

 FY 2015 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 FY 2016 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

 FY 2014 / 

 FY 2015 / 

 FY 2016 / 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2014 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2015 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2014 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2015 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

 3-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

 10-year note (Nov) / 

 10-year note reopening (Dec/Jan) / / - / 

 30-year bond (Nov) / 

 30-year bond reopening (Dec/Jan) / / 

 2-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

 5-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

 7-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

 10-year TIPS reopening (Nov) 

 5-year TIPS reopening (Dec) 

 10-year TIPS (Jan) 

 2-year FRN (Jan) 

 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates 

 52-week bill size (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

 Total change in bills outstanding 11/13-1/14 / 

 Total change in bills outstanding FY 2014 / 

 CMB issuance Nov ‘13 – Jan ‘14 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics 

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2014 and FY2015. Do you believe the current 

auction schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s expected financing needs? What adjustments, if any, would 

you recommend? 

2. Please comment on whether smaller, more frequent 5-year TIPS auctions would be beneficial to the market. How 

might Treasury consider implementing such a change? 

3. Please discuss the impact of the recent debt limit impasse on the Treasury bill and financing markets.
April 25, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NEW DELIVERANCE CHURCH, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-10-01127-CV V.

ADAM MILLER AND HOUSSIERE, DURANT & HOUSSIERE, LLP, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees was heard on 

the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the 

judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and 

REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court's opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellees.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8265.                 

*Date Filed:*                     November 8, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     CTC COMP 0321 dated 7 November 2000, Resolution 033f—Local Currency Rate Changes—Hungary, Intended effective date: 1 January 2001.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8275.                 

*Date Filed:*                     November 9, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     PTC31 N&C/CIRC 0134 dated 7 November 2000, TC31 Circle Pacific Expedited Resolution 002q, PTC31 N&C/CIRC 0135 dated 7 November 2000, TC31 Circle Pacific Expedited Resolutions 002k, 073c, Intended effective date: 30 November 2000.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8277.                 

*Date Filed:*                     November 9, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     PTC31 N&C/CIRC 0136 dated 7 November 2000, North and Central Pacific Areawide Expedited Resolution r-1 PTC31 N&C/CIRC 0137 dated 7 November 2000, TC31 North and Central Pacific, TC3 (except Japan)-North America, Caribbean Expedited Resolutions r2-r10 PTC31 N&C/CIRC 0138 dated 7 November 2000, TC31-North and Central Pacific, TC3-Central America, South America Expedited Resolutions r11-r16, Intended effective date: 1 December 2000.                

Dorothy Y. Beard,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 00-29757 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2

   



 

 

 

 

 September ___, 2015 

 

[Executive]

[Title]

Cape Bank 

201 Shore Road 

Linwood, NJ 08221 

 

 

Dear [Executive], 

 

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Board of Directors has decided to extend the term of your present Change in Control Agreement for another year. The term of your extended agreement begins on October 1, 2015 and will continue (12) full calendar months thereafter as outlined in section 1 TERM of your agreement. Should you have any questions or concerns please feel free to reach out to me. 

 

 



 

 

Michael D. Devlin 

President & CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 330 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 330

 Designating May 1994 as ``National Community Residential Care Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1994

  Mr. Doolittle introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating May 1994 as ``National Community Residential Care Month''.

Whereas the need for quality, dependable health care for the elderly, disabled, 
        and mentally ill increases each year;
Whereas community residential care fulfills medical, social, and nutritional 
        assistance to those in need and who cannot care for themselves;
Whereas the community residential care industry is both national and 
        international, and it is deserving of recognition and appreciation;
Whereas the community residential care industry is staffed by committed, 
        hardworking professionals who dedicate their working lives to the care 
        of the elderly, the disabled, and the mentally ill;
Whereas those providing community residential care must meet stringent licensing 
        requirements; and
Whereas the community residential care industry provides a uniquely workable and 
        homelike environment for those unable to care for themselves at home in 
        a manner which promotes confidence, support, and self-esteem: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 1994 is designated as 
``National Community Residential Care Month''. The President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe such month with appropriate ceremonies 
and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Agenda – February 2012 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – January 26-27, 2012 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, January 

23, 2012 to Debt.Management@treasury.gov and Mark.Cabana@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not 

scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

Low/High 

January – March 2012 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

April – June 2012 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

FY 2012 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

FY 2013 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

FY 2014 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

FY 2012 / 

FY 2013 / 

FY 2014 / 

Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2012 

Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2013 

Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2012 

Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2013 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

3-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / / 

10-year note (February) / 

10-year note reopening (March/April) / / - / 

30-year bond (February) / 

30-year bond reopening (March/April) / 

2-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / / 

5-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / / 

7-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / / 

30-year TIPS (February) 

10-year TIPS reopening (March) 

5-year TIPS (April) 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill size (February/March/April) / / / / - / / 

Total change in bills outstanding 2/12-4/12 / 

Total change in bills outstanding FY 2012 / 

CMB issuance February ‘12 – April ‘12 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2012 and FY2013. Do 

you believe the current auction schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s expected 

financing needs? 

2. Please discuss trends in Treasury market liquidity. What are the primary drivers behind 

any changes observed recently? 

3. Please comment on current demand for TIPS securities and how Treasury might further 

develop the TIPS program. In this discussion, please include your thoughts on tenors and 

sizes for TIPS issuance in 2012.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-
Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Jeffrey A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		August 15, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-388-000]

Take notice that on November 7, 2000, WFEC GENCO, L.L.C., petitioned the Commission for acceptance of its Rate Schedule FERC No. 1, the granting of certain blanket approvals, including the authority to sell electricity at market-based rates, and the waiver of certain of the Commission's Regulations.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on November 20, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at ­                    *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29344  Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

R'KES STARLING,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-cv-00852-P

STERLING FINANCIAL & CO.,

Defendant.

ORDER

This action was filed in on September 22, 2022. ECF No. 1. Under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), defendants must be served within 

90 days after the complaint is filed. FED. R. CIV. P. 4. When a plaintiff 

fails to comply with Rule 4(m), the Court is required to dismiss the 

action. Id. While the 90 days have not passed, the Court issues this 

Order to remind Plaintiff that if it fails to file proof of service on or 

before December 21, 2022, the Court will dismiss all claims under 

Rule 4(m) and pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. See FED.

R. CIV. P. 4(m), 41(b); Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 

1998); Long v. Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5th Cir. 1996); Boudwin v. 

Grayston Ins. Co., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citation omitted).

SO ORDERED on this 13th day of December 2022.

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00852-P Document 5 Filed 12/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance (FACI)

Agenda

September 26, 2023

1:30 – 1:40 pm Introduction & Federal Insurance Office (FIO) Update

1:40 – 2:05 pm Presentation by Bob Garofalo and Scott Robinson of Moody’s

– Overview of U.S. life insurance sector 

2:05 – 2:20 pm Presentation by Elizabeth Brown (FIO) - Report on Insurance 

Supervision and Regulation of Climate-Related Risks (2023)

2:20 – 3:00 pm Presentation by Rich Babel, Etienne Scarborough, and Robin 

Fitzgerald of Oliver Wyman – A Case Study in Analyzing 

Homeowners Insurance Availability and Affordability 

Following a Catastrophe

3:00 – 3:10 pm Break

3:10 – 3:40 pm Presentation by Kevin Stine of the National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) – NIST Cybersecurity 

Framework 2.0

3:40 – 3:55 pm FACI Subcommittee Updates

3:55 – 4:00 pm New Business/Adjourn
Case 2:22-cr-00090-Z-BR Document 44 Filed 01/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 111
Kenyon House 1TheWestern-Centre WestemRoad Bracknell RG121RW

"1',111 

### "1" "L. 

## P I:4b dH.! MUD --' U.S. Department of Transportation, Dockets Attn: Dockets OST98-3304 400 Seventh St. S.W. PL401 Washington DC, 20590 USA 26th July 2013

Dear Sir, Further to my letter of 29th January 2013, Kenyon is pleased to be able to inform you that we will provide third party recovery support to Insel Air International in the event of mass fatality incident under the U.S.Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Act of 1996. Ifyou have any questions relating to this letter, please contact me at the above address.

Cc. Ruben Welvaart - Insel Air International

, ,'J
," -

Kenyon UK a branch of Kenyon International Emergency Services Inc" 15180 Grand Point Drive, Houston, Texas 77090. Company Reg, No. FC24150. VATReg, No. 793 0410 38 , !
# Official Journal C 188/23 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4723 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4723 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 188/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 188/2 | List of experts appointed as members of the scientific committees | 2 |
| 2004/C 188/3 | Commission Notice — Appointment of the Chairman and members of the Conciliation Body established by Commission Decision 94/442/EC of 1 July 1994 setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section | 7 |
| 2004/C 188/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3472 — RELIANCE/TREVIRA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 188/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 188/2

List of experts appointed as members of the scientific committees

2

2004/C 188/3

Commission Notice — Appointment of the Chairman and members of the Conciliation Body established by Commission Decision 94/442/EC of 1 July 1994 setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section

7

2004/C 188/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3472 — RELIANCE/TREVIRA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 188/5 | Notice of invitation to tender for the reduction in the import duty on maize imported from non-member countries | 9 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 188/5

Notice of invitation to tender for the reduction in the import duty on maize imported from non-member countries

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN