alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 231 (Thursday, November 30, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 71247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29792]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 121, 125, 135 and 145

[Docket No. 28293 (FAA-2000-7952)]
RIN 2120-AF71


Service Difficulty Reports

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is issuing this 
notice to advise the public of a meeting to discuss public concerns 
with reporting requirements of the Service Difficulty Report (SDR) 
Final Rule, Docket No. 28293 (FAA-2000-7952)

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 11, 2000, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. 
Arrangements for presentations must be made by December 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the FAA 3rd Floor Auditorium, 
800 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jose Figueroa, Federal Aviation 
Administration, AFS-300, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591, telephone (202) 267-3797, fax (202) 267-5115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be held on December 11, 
2000, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., at the FAA 3rd Floor Auditorium, 
Washington, DC. The agenda will include:
    1. SDR Reporting Requirements
    2. SDR Guidance Materials
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but will be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements by December 6, 
2000, to present oral statements at the meeting. If you are in need of 
assistance or require a reasonable accommodation for the meeting please 
contact the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT. In addition, sign and oral interpretation can be made 
available at the meeting, as well as an assistive listening device, if 
requested 10 calendar days before the meeting. Arrangements may be made 
by contacting the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 16, 2000.
L. Nicholas Lacey,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 00-29792 Filed 11-29-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 358

Designating September 18, 1994, through September 24, 1994, as ‘‘Iron

Overload Diseases Awareness Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1994

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating September 18, 1994, through September 24,

1994, as ‘‘Iron Overload Diseases Awareness Week’’.

Whereas 1 United States resident in 200 is estimated to

carry double genes that cause accumulation of excessive

iron stores, resulting in diseases of the heart, liver, sex

glands, pancreas, and the joints, with ultimate fatality if

untreated;

Whereas our Nation’s carrier rate of the single

hemochromatosis gene is estimated to be 26 in 200; and

Whereas many doctors and their patients are not aware of

this incidence: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HJ 358 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 18, 1994, through September 24, 1994,

4 is designated as ‘‘Iron Overload Diseases Awareness

5 Week’’, and citizens of the United States are urged to par6 ticipate in protecting their health by informing themselves

7 of this common but underdiagnosed condition.

Æ
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 -75.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

★

● ●

● ●
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 428 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 428

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
           relative to the desecration of the American Flag.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

   Mr. Pickett introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
           relative to the desecration of the American Flag.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes a part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of the its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Notwithstanding any provision of the Constitution, the 
Congress is empowered to enact and enforce laws prohibiting the 
desecration of the Flag of the United States of America.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This article shall take effect immediately upon 
ratification.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:22-cr-00009-P-BU     Document 43     Filed 07/12/22      Page 1 of 2     PageID 124

Case 1:22-cr-00009-P-BU     Document 43     Filed 07/12/22      Page 2 of 2     PageID 125
Exhibit 10.3(E)

 

[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

January 9, 2014

 

Marina Biotech, Inc.

3830 Monte Villa Parkway

Bothell, Washington, 98021

Attn: Michael French, Chief executive Officer

 

Re:                             Agreement re Option Compound and miR-34 Sequences

 

Dear Michael:

 

As you know, Mirna Therapeutics, Inc. (“MirnaRx”) and Marina Biotech, Inc. (“Marina Bio”) have entered into an amendment, effective as December 27, 2013, to that certain license agreement dated December 22, 2011 (the “License Agreement”, and such amendment the “Amendment”).  This letter agreement is that certain Amendment Side Letter referred to in the Amendment, and it sets forth the RNA oligonucleotide sequences of the Option Compounds that the Parties are agreeing to designate as Selected MirnaRx Compounds pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.  Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment Side Letter shall have the meaning given to those terms in the License Agreement.

 

The Parties hereby agree that the list of RNA oligonucleotide sequences attached as the Appendix of this Amendment Side Letter comprises sequences of miR-34, let-7, miR-25, [***] as well as the sequences of two Option Compounds [***] under the terms of the License Agreement.  The Parties further agree that such sequences are the highly confidential information of MirnaRx, and Marina Bio shall comply with the confidentiality obligations set forth in the License Agreement with respect thereto, and shall not disclose such sequences to any third party or use them for any purpose outside of the License Agreement.

 

	
AGREED TO BY:
    	
Mirna   Therapeutics, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/   Paul Lammers
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Paul   Lammers, M,D., M.Sc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Marina   Biotech, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/   Michael French
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Michael   French
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    


 











 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

APPENDIX

 

miR-34 Sequence:

[***]

 

let-7 Sequence

[***]

 

miR-215 Sequence

[***]

 

[***]

 

[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00096-Z-BR

§

ARKON CALDWELL (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

ARKON CALDWELL (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining ARKON CALDWELL (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that ARKON CALDWELL (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) - FAILURE TO 

REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by 

the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: November 14, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00096-Z-BR Document 30 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 67
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 15 July 2004

in Joined Cases C-37/02 and C-38/02 (references for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Veneto): Di Lenardo Adriano Srl and Dilexport Srl v Ministero del Commercio con l'Estero (1)

(Bananas - Common organisation of the market - Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 - Common system of trade with third countries - Primary imports - Validity - Protection of legitimate expectations - Retroactivity - Implementing power)

(2004/C 228/06)

Language of the case: Italian

In Joined Cases C-37/02 and C-38/02: references to the Court under Article 234 EC for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Veneto (Italy) in the proceedings pending before that court between Di Lenardo Adriano Srl (C-37/02), Dilexport Srl (C-38/02) and Ministero del Commercio con l'Estero on the validity of Articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 31 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 896/2001of 7 May 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 as regards the arrangements for importing bananas into the Community (OJ 2001 L 126, p. 6) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet and R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), F. Macken and N. Colneric, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Admininistrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004, in which it has ruled:

Consideration of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling have disclosed nothing to affect the validity of Articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 6(c) and 31 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 896/2001 of 7 May 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 as regards the arrangements for importing bananas into the Community.

----

(1)OJ C 97 of 20.4.2002.

----
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 30, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00784-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.I.O. O. AND J.I.O.O., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 470-52919-2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Carlyle Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his notice of appeal. Appellant appeals from the trial court’s February 29, 2024 final decree of divorce. Because appellant file d a timely motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due on May 29, 2024 or, with an extension motion, June 13, 2024.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(a) (providing ninety-d ay deadline for filing notice of appeal), 26.3 (providing for fifteen-day extens ion of time to file notice of appeal). Appellant filed a notice of a ppeal on July 1, 2024, eighteen days past the last possible due date.–2– In his motion, appellant asks that we allow his late-filed appeal. However, this Court lacks the authority to do so. See id . 2 (appellate court cannot suspend rules to alter time for perfecting appeal); Mitschke v. Borromeo , 645 S.W.3d 251, 260 (Tex. 2022) (“[T]he absence of a timely notice of appeal prevents the appellate court from ever exercising jurisdiction in th e first place.”). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion and dismiss the a ppeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

240784F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF J.I.O.O. AND J.I.O.O., CHILDREN
No. 05-24-00784-CV On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 470-52919- 2022. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee Candace Marie Oy enuga recover her costs of this appeal from appellant Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga.
Judgment entered July 30, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC., et al., 

Intervenor Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its decision on the 

Summary and Final Judgment in this case. See VanDerStok v. Garland, 86 F.4th 179 (5th Cir. 

2023). In light of that decision, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer and provide a joint

report regarding the status of this case and how the parties intend to proceed. See Status Report 

Order, ECF No. 273. The parties accordingly filed their joint report on December 4, 2023, 

notifying the Court of their opposing positions as to how the case should proceed. See Joint Status 

Report, ECF No. 274. 

Having considered the joint report and applicable law, the Court subsequently ordered 

Defendants to file a status report notifying the Court if and when they file a petition for writ of 

certiorari (or seek any other form of review) with the Supreme Court of the United States on this 

case, or when the time for seeking any such review has expired, whichever occurs first. See Status 

Report Order, ECF No. 277. On February 8, 2023, Defendants filed a Notice of Filing of Petition 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 279 Filed 02/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5370
2

for Certiorari, notifying the Court that they “have filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme 

Court in this case.” Notice, ECF No. 278 (citing Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23-852 (S. Ct.)). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby STAYED pending 

termination of the stay granted in the August 8, 2023 Order of the Supreme Court of the United 

States. See Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23A82 (U.S. Aug. 8, 2023). The Clerk of Court is 

DIRECTED to administratively close the above-captioned case for statistical purposes until 

otherwise directed by the Court.

SO ORDERED on this 13th day of February, 2024. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 279 Filed 02/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5371
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 308

Providing for the display of the flag at half-mast on Government buildings

on the 7th of December of each year in honor and remembrance of

the members of the Armed Forces who served at Pearl Harbor on

December 7, 1941.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1994

Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. MONTGOMERY) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the display of the flag at half-mast on Government buildings on the 7th of December of each year

in honor and remembrance of the members of the Armed

Forces who served at Pearl Harbor on December 7,

1941.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President is authorized and requested to issue

4 annually a proclamation calling upon officials of the Gov-
2

•HJ 308 IH

1 ernment to display the flag of the United States at half2 mast on the 7th of December on all Government buildings

3 in honor and remembrance of the members of the Armed

4 Forces who served at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

Æ
# Official Journal C 89A/25 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 89A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6525 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 89A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6525 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2022/C 89 A/01 | Call for expressions of interest – Auditors (NGEU programme) – Temporary staff (AD 5 to AD 7) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Auditors

2022/C 89 A/01

Call for expressions of interest – Auditors (NGEU programme) – Temporary staff (AD 5 to AD 7)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### NEW v. STATE.

No. 21784.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1942.

Nat Gentry, Jr., of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Burglary is the offense; the punishment, two years in the state penitentiary.

The facts show a daytime burglary of the private residence of Will Harris.

Mrs. Harris testified that, on the afternoon of the day of the alleged offense, before leaving home, she placed certain clothing and wearing apparel on the back porch, to be picked up by the cleaner. The screen door to the porch was closed and' fastened by a screen latch, and, by reason of spring hinges, would, at all times, remain closed, unless expressly held open or the closing thereof, in some manner, prevented.

A short time after Mrs. Harris left, appellant was seen, by a city detective, trying to sell some wearing apparel under such circumstances as to arouse his suspicion. He inquired of appellant relative thereto, when appellant directed and accompanied the officers to the Harris home and there admitted to them that he took the clothing and wearing apparel from the back porch of the house, the entry to which he gained by opening the screen door. The clothing and wearing apparel in appellant’s possession were identified by Mrs. Harris as being the same which she had left on the porch, to be picked up by the cleaner.

The facts showing the entry of the house by means of a breaking and the subsequent taking of the property authorize the conviction.

Appellant did not testify as a witness in his own behalf.

No bills of exception accompany the record.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 13.1




Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Midatech Pharma PLC (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned James N. Phillips, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Nicholas Robbins-Cherry, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: April 13, 2016
/s/ James N. PhillipsJames N. PhillipsChief Executive Officer
 
 /s/ Nicholas Robbins-CherryNicholas Robbins-CherryChief Financial Officer
  A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO MIDATECH PHARMA PLC AND WILL BE RETAINED BY MIDATECH PHARMA PLC AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.