alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 183/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 183 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5810 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 183

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5810 July 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1091 of 9 July 2014 on the measures SA.34191 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2012/CP) implemented by Latvia for A/S Air Baltic Corporation (airBaltic)
  (notified under document C(2014) 4552)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1092 of 23 July 2014 on the State aid SA.34824 (2012/C), SA.36007 (2013/NN) SA.36658 (2014/NN), SA.37156 (2014/NN), SA.34534 (2012/NN) implemented by Greece for National Bank of Greece Group related to:

  (notified under document C(2014) 5201)

   (
  1
  ) | 29 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 95 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a lateral collision [2015/1093] | 91 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1091 of 9 July 2014 on the measures SA.34191 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2012/CP) implemented by Latvia for A/S Air Baltic Corporation (airBaltic)
  (notified under document C(2014) 4552)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2014) 4552)

1

1

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1092 of 23 July 2014 on the State aid SA.34824 (2012/C), SA.36007 (2013/NN) SA.36658 (2014/NN), SA.37156 (2014/NN), SA.34534 (2012/NN) implemented by Greece for National Bank of Greece Group related to:

  (notified under document C(2014) 5201)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2014) 5201)

1

29

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 95 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a lateral collision [2015/1093]

91

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
----

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 25 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2005

Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1) and the Commission notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3)

(2005/C 172/07)

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Quarterly Report of TN-K Energy Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ken Page, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 15, 2010
/s/ Ken PageKen Page, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Agenda -- February 2008 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings Thursday January 24, 2008 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 p.m. Wednesday, 

January 23 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and Matthew.Rutherford@ny.frb.org. Even if you are 

not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Borrowing Estimates Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not surprise 

you 

 Low/High 

 January-March / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 April-June / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

 FY 2008 / 

 FY 2009 / 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance 

 10-year note / 

 30-year bond / 

 10-year reopening / 

 2-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / 

 5-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 5-year TIPS / / / / - / / 

 10-year TIPS reopening / 

IV. Bill Issuance

 Dates(s) anticipated and sizes (mm/yy) 

 CMB(s) to be issued / / / 

(Please provide your estimates in the format provided above with central estimates followed by low/high estimates for each issue. In 

Section IV, enter your best estimate of sizes and dates of bills and CMBs). 

Discussion Topics 

1. Have you revised, or are you considering revising, your forecast for the budget deficit since last 

quarter? If yes, please elaborate on the reasons for the change. What are the drivers of your forecast 

for lower or higher budget deficits, and how would Treasury need to respond to effectively finance 

such scenarios? 

2. Please discuss the recent volatility in financing markets surrounding the turn of the year. What was 

its impact on dynamics in the fixed income market, particularly the Treasury market? In addition, 

what actions could Treasury undertake to mitigate this volatility? 

3. What actions could Treasury undertake to minimize the impact of recent financial market stress on 

the real economy?
Case 4:22-cr-00263-P Document 19 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 31
Case 4:22-cr-00263-P Document 19 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 32
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6021
JOSEPH PATRICK PAYNE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS B. FAIRBURN; GARLAND STOKES; WILLIAM P.ROGERS; JOHN B. TAYLOR; EDWARD MURRAY, Director; FRED E. JORDON, JR.; SAM FILIPIO; PAUL WATSON, JR., ROBERT FRANCIS SMITH, JR.; EDGAR ASHER; WILLIAM HOWARD MILLER; TERRY STILTONER, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN LATANE LEWIS, III, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-88-1212-AM, CA-93-322-AM) Submitted: October 22, 1996 Decided: November 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Joseph Patrick Payne, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Payne v. Fairburn , Nos. CA-88-1212-AM; CA-93-322-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 1995); see also Heck v. Humphrey , ___ U.S. ___, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594 (U.S. June 24, 1994) (No. 93-6188). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
✎AO 187 (Rev. 7/87) Exhibit and Witness List

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF

EXHIBIT AND WITNESS LIST

V.

Case Number:

 PRESIDING JUDGE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY

 TRIAL DATE (S) COURT REPORTER COURTROOM DEPUTY

PLF.

NO.

DEF.

NO.

DATE

OFFERED MARKED ADMITTED DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS* AND WITNESSES

* Include a notation as to the location of any exhibit not held with the case file or not available because of size.

Page 1 of Pages

NORTHERN TEXAS USA TIMETHY MARRUGO 2:22-CR-105-Z-BR-(1) Kacsmaryk AnnaMarie Bell Michael King 06/06/2023 M. Daniel V.Shrewsbury 6/6/2023 X X Exhibit A - Sealed Document 1

Print Save As... Export as FDF Retrieve FDF File Reset New Page

Case 2:22-cr-00105-Z-BR Document 45 Filed 06/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 110
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 82 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.82
                                           Agreed to May 7, 1993        
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.
    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds 
on July 17, 1993, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of 
the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association 
shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 
incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be required 
to carry out the event under this resolution.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A2 40 4 . EDDI E GENTRY v . DANNY HI NES.

Th i s cas e o ri g i n at ed as an act i o n fo r d am ag es in m ag i s trat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g

a n a d v e r s e ru l i ng , Ed d i e Gen t ry ap p eal ed t h e m ag i st rat e co u rt ’ s d eci s i on t o t h e

s u p eri o r co u rt , wh i ch en t ered a ju dg m en t award i n g $ 5
, 0 0 0 t o Dan n y Hi n es

. Gen t ry

t h en ap p eal ed d i rect l y

t o t h i s Co u rt

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r t wo reas o n s

. F i r s t , O C G A § 5

- 6

- 3 5 ( a ) ( 6 ) r e q u i r e s t h e f i l i n g o f a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r d i s cret i o n ary ap peal “ in al l act io n s fo r d am ag es i n w h i ch t h e j u d gm en t i s $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 .0 0

o r l es s .” See Jen n i n g

s v

. M o ss , 2 3 5 Ga. Ap p

. 3 5 7 (5 0 9 SE2 d 6 5 5 ) (1 9 9 8). Seco n d,
b ecau s e t h e o rd er at i s s u e d i s p o s es o f a de n o vo ap p eal fro m a m ag i s t rat e co u rt
d eci s i o n , OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ) al s o req ui red Gen try t o fo l lo w t h e d i s cret i o n ary
ap p eal p ro ced u res

. See E n g l i s h v. Del br i d

g e , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 3 6 6, 3 6 7 (4 5 4 SE2 d 1 7 5 ) (1 9 9 5).
Gen t ry ’ s fai l u re t o co m

p l y w i t h th e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u res d ep ri v es

u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/03/2015 September 03, 2015
Exhibit 10.3


 


 


Pacific
Special Acquisition Corp.


40
Wall Street, 28th Floor


New
York, New York 10005


 





	 	__________, 2015


 






Zhengqi
International Holding Limited


40
Wall Street, 28th Floor


New
York, New York 10005


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of Pacific Special Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier
of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case
as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
Zhengqi International Holding Limited (“Zhengqi International”) shall make available to the Company certain office
space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 40 Wall Street,
28th Floor, New York, New York 10005 (or any successor location).  In exchange therefore, the Company shall
pay Zhengqi International the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination
Date Zhengqi International hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies
that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation
of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising
out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any
reason whatsoever. No party hereto may assign either this letter agreement or any of its rights, interests, or obligations hereunder
without the prior written approval of the other party, provided that Zhengqi International may assign this letter agreement to
an affiliate without the prior written approval of the Company. Any purported assignment in violation of this paragraph shall
be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest or title to the purported assignee.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	PACIFIC SPECIAL ACQUISITION
    CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Zhouhong Peng
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
    Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	ZHENGQI INTERNATIONAL HOLDING
    LIMITED	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
# C_2006143EN.01003702.xml

| 17.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/37

---

Action brought on 8 April 2006 — Luigi Mancuccio v Commission of the European Communities

(Case F-40/06)

(2006/C 143/72)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Mancuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: V. Messa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the implied decision by which the applicant's request dated 1 March 2005 to the Appointing Authority to have sent to him a certified copy of the original of the bill of lading relating to the presumed dispatching of his personal effects from Angola to Italy; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the implied decision by which the applicant's request dated 1 March 2005 to the Appointing Authority to have sent to him a certified copy of the original of the bill of lading relating to the presumed dispatching of his personal effects from Angola to Italy;

| — | order the defendant to pay to the applicant, by way of damages for the losses resulting from the adoption of the contested act, the amount of EUR 10 000, or an amount to be assessed by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay to the applicant, by way of damages for the losses resulting from the adoption of the contested act, the amount of EUR 10 000, or an amount to be assessed by the Court;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a former Commission official who took retirement on 30 May 2005, requested from that institution the bill of lading for his personal effects and property assigned to his residence in Angola, the country to which he had been assigned as an economic advisor with the Commission's delegation.

In May 2003, the defendant was arranging for the removal from the official lodgings assigned to the applicant, who maintains that only part of his personal effects were collected for removal. By memorandum of 16 May 2005, the defendant informed the applicant that his personal effects and his automobile had been sent to Italy and asked him to contact the shipping agent to arrange for delivery.

By letter of 1 March 2005, the applicant requested, inter alia, a detailed list of what had been delivered to him, and also a copy of the bill of lading. That request was not answered, as indicated in the claim brought by the applicant on 2 September 2005.

inter alia

In support of his action, the applicant states that the implied decision to reject his claim is illegitimate on grounds of absolute failure to state reasons, infringement of the law, infringement of the obligation to have due regard to the welfare of officials, the principle of transparency, the principle of sound administration, and also the principle of neminem laedere.

neminem laedere

---
# Official Journal C 460/12 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 460 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6412 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 460

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6412 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 460/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 460/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 413

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating November 1, 1994, as ‘‘National Family

Literacy Day’’.

Whereas millions of American families are trapped in a cycle

of poverty, dependency, and undereducation;

Whereas research shows that the most important factor in

determining the life chances of a child is the level of educational attainment of the parents of the child;

Whereas a child whose parents lack a high school diploma are

more than twice as likely to live in poverty than a child

whose parents are high school graduates;
2

HJ 413 RFS

Whereas the level of education of a parent affects the level

of literacy of the children of the parent, even when the

children become adults;

Whereas family literacy programs can increase parent involvement in the education of children of the parent;

Whereas a child in a family literacy program demonstrates

greater gains than a child in a child-focused program;

Whereas an adult participating in a family literacy program

is more likely to remain in the program than an adult

participating in an adult-focused program;

Whereas family literacy programs, such as Even Start and

Head Start, provide a promising approach to improving

the literacy skills of families; and

Whereas, if literacy is to be increased among the next generation of families, it is necessary to use family literacy programs to increase the educational skills of parents and

children of the parents: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That November 1, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Fam4 ily Literacy Day’’. The President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe this day with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.