alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


September 22, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, New York Municipal Portfolio
of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 10


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, New York Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 10 set forth above
(the “Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices
indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on September 21, 2015, in accordance with the
valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The
Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-206285)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing
of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                          


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29715]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: National Science Foundation, National Science 
Board, Executive Committee.

DATE AND TIME: November 22, 2000, 10 a.m.-10:15 a.m. Open Session; 
November 22, 2000, 10:15 a.m.-11 a.m. Closed Session.

PLACE: The National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1205, Arlington, VA 22230.

STATUS: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. Part of this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  

Wednesday, November 22, 2000

OPEN SESSION (10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m.)

--Approval of NSB Interim Report on International S&E
--Approval of Management Response to NSF/OIG Semiannual Report

CLOSED SESSION (10:15 a.m. to 11 a.m.)

--NSF Budget

Marta Cehelsky,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29715 Filed 11-15-00; 4:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 21345.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 12, 1941.

Mark M. Carter, of Goose Creek (King C. Haynie, of Houston, of counsel on motion for rehearing only), for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction for negligent homicide; punishment assessed at thirty days in jail.

On original submission the case appeared as one having neither statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record, and in an opinion of date January 8, 1941, it was so disposed of by judgment of affirmance. On January 22, 1941, appellant filed a motion for a rehearing, among other things calling attention to the fact that in all substantial particulars the State’s pleading and the judgment in this case were the same as in Bowles v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 146 S.W.2d 183, which had been reversed on October 30, 1940, and .the State’s motion for rehearing overruled on January 8, 1941. This contention was overlooked in passing on the overruling of the motion for rehearing in the present case. In a request for leave to file a second motion for rehearing appellant again calls attention to the opinions in the Bowles’ case, supra, not yet reported [in State Report].

The complaint and information contained two counts, the first charging appellant with negligent homicide of the first degree, and the second charging him with negligent homicide of the second degree. This case differs from the Bowles case only in the fact that the present case was tried before a jury. However, no instructions to the jury appear in the record and we are advised that an oral charge was given as is permissible under Article 663, C.C.P., but we are not informed from the record what the oral instructions were. We are without a statement of facts. Therefore we do not know what evidence was developed on the trial nor what laws applied relative thereto. The verdict returned by the jury reads as follows: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged and assess his penalty at thirty days in jail.” Upon that verdict the court adjudged only that appellant pay the costs of prosecution and that he be committed to the sheriff to he confined in, jail for thirty days. Neither the verdict nor-judgment specify of what degree of negligent homicide appellant has been, found guilty. Having no charge of the court before us and no facts proven on the trial, we are without data from which the judgment could be reformed. There is no' alternative but to reverse the judgment for the reasons clearly set out in the opinions in Bowles v. State, supra.

The judgment of affirmance and the judgment overruling appellant’s motion for rehearing are set aside and the opinions-withdrawn and the present opinion substituted therefor. The mandate heretofore issued is recalled. The judgment of the trial court is now reversed and the cause-remanded.
```

[Federal Register: October 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 190)]
[Notices]               
[Page 60846]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01oc10-115]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7164]

 
Notice of Intent To Establish the President's Emergency Plan for 
AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Scientific Advisory Board, Hereinafter Referred to 
as ``the Board''

SUMMARY: This is a notice of intent to establish The President's 
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Scientific Advisory Board, 
hereinafter referred to as ``the Board.''
    The Board serves the Global AIDS Coordinator (``the Coordinator'') 
in a solely advisory capacity concerning scientific, implementation, 
and policy issues related to the global response to HIV/AIDS. These 
issues will be of concern as they influence the priorities and 
direction of PEPFAR evaluation and research, the content of national 
and international strategies and implementation, and the role of PEPFAR 
in the international discourse regarding appropriate and resourced 
responses.
    The Board will be composed of 25 to 30 members appointed by the 
Coordinator, representing U.S. Government and non-U.S. Government 
personnel. The membership will be representative of the HIV/AIDS 
community, academia, international experts, partner government 
representatives, multilateral and bilateral agency representatives, 
foundations, advocates, and non-governmental organizations. Members who 
are not U.S. employees will be representative members.
    Public notice of all meetings of the Panel will be provided in the 
Federal Register in accordance with the FACA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul D. Bouey, Office of the U.S. 
Global AIDS Coordinator, Washington, DC 20037, BoueyPD@state.gov.
    This certification will be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 27, 2010.
Paul D. Bouey,
Deputy Coordinator, Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-24691 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-261-Y 

 § 

KRISTOPHER LEE ROCCO (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 29, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00261-Y Document 26 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 64
Memorandum Opinion issued March 20, 2014 Withdrawn; Affirmed and 

Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed April 3, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00218-CR

DANIEL MICAH VERMILYEA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1335846

S U B S T I T U T E M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We withdraw the opinion issued March 20, 2014 and issue this opinion in its 

place. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to indecency with a child. On March 

8, 2013, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for nine years in the 

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed 

a timely notice of appeal.
2

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to 

be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the 

record was provided to him. On March 24, 2014, appellant filed a pro se response 

to counsel’s brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s 

response, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing 

to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim 

raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are 

no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
#### Marlin N. HOLTON v. STATE.

No. 21860.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 25, 1942.

Drew S. Qifton, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

In this case appellant presents the same questions as he did in cause No. 21,859, 158 S.W.2d 772, this day decided by this court. We do not deem it necessary to set out the facts as they are sufficient to sustain the conviction. The legal propositions advanced by appellant are the same as those in cause No. 21,859. For the reasons assigned by us in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the trial court in the present instance is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# CA2009043EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 43/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 43/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Order filed, September 12, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00483-CR

____________

CHARLES E. WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 25th District Court

Colorado County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-029

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 27, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Patricia Wagner, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 75

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1994, as ‘‘National Good

Teen Day’’.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 75

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1994, as ‘‘National Good Teen

Day’’.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed

January 16, 1992, as ‘‘Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in

the United States according to the 1990 Census;

Whereas our Nation’s teenagers represent an important part

of our society, and the many physical and emotional

changes and character-building experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;

Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who

have problems or those who excel;
2

HJ 75 EH

Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their

intelligence, abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the

good which is inherent in all human beings;

Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to

esteem the good as well as the potential that is within

each of them;

Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive

qualities in America’s youth; and

Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That January 16, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Good

4 Teen Day,’’ and the President is authorized and requested

5 to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers

7 of the United States and by participating in appropriate

8 ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of June 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asGeneral Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK,N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A, as NCB SpecialServicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administratorand as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C29 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer duringthe period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has beenmade under my supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the GeneralMaster Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 38

 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
 respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate and 
                     the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

    Mr. McCollum (for himself, Mr. Allard, Mr. Armey, Mr. Bachus of 
Alabama, Mr. Baker of California, Mr. Barrett of Nebraska, Mr. Bartlett 
of Maryland, Mr. Blute, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Camp, 
     Mr. Canady, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Crane, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
Bilirakis, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Dickey, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Everett, Mr. 
  Franks of New Jersey, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
 Goss, Mr. Grams, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Gunderson, Ms. Dunn, Mr. Hansen, 
 Mr. Hoke, Mr. Horn, Mr. Huffington, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. 
Inglis, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Istook, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Kingston, 
 Mr. Klug, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Kim, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Lazio, 
 Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. Linder, Mr. McInnis, Mr. McKeon, Mr. McMillan, Mr. 
Manzullo, Mr. Mica, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Packard, Mr. Paxon, Mr. 
  Pombo, Mrs. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. 
Royce, Mr. Machtley, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. Smith of 
   Oregon, Mr. Sundquist, Mr. Talent, Mr. Stump, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. 
  Zeliff, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, and Mr. Thomas of 
Wyoming), introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
 respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate and 
                     the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``No person who has been elected to the Senate two times shall be 
eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. No person who has 
been elected to the House of Representatives six times shall be 
eligible for election to the House of Representatives.''.

                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk April 28 , 2017

152778 (55)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 152778

v COA: 315209

Alger CC: 2012

- 001997

- FC

ISRAEL A. VELEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing hi s supplemental brief is GRANTED . The supplemental brief will be accepted

as t imely filed if submitted on or before May 30 , 2017. The due date of plaintiff

appellee ’s supplemental brief is also extended to Ma y 30 , 2017.
H. J. Res. 110

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Joint Resolution

To authorize the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct

appropriate programs and activities to acknowledge the status of the county

of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘World Capital of Aerobatics’’, and for other

purposes.

Whereas the International Aerobatic Club, which was founded on

February 6, 1970, held its first championships in August 1970

in the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin;

Whereas in 1992 the International Aerobatic Club had 5,342 members throughout the world, representatives of which gathered

in Fond du Lac to compete in the 23d Annual Aerobatic Championships during the period of August 9–14, 1992;

Whereas in 1992 the Experimental Aircraft Association and the

Board of Directors of the International Aerobatic Club named

Fond du Lac as the ‘‘World Capital of Aerobatics’’;

Whereas participants and spectators drawn to the aerobatic championships in Fond du Lac stimulate the economic well-being of

the community and provide a spectator event of international

significance; and

Whereas Congress declares that the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, is the ‘‘World Capital of Aerobatics’’: Now, therefore, be

it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may conduct appropriate programs and activities at the Fond du Lac County Airport

to acknowledge the status of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin,

17:07 Aug 09, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\HJ110.ENR bend06
H. J. Res. 110—2

as the ‘‘World Capital of Aerobatics’’, and that the airport may

display signs notifying the public of such status.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

17:07 Aug 09, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\HJ110.ENR bend06