alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 293

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor

of Captain Francis Gary Powers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 15, 1993

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Ms. BYRNE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage

stamp in honor of Captain Francis Gary Powers.

Whereas Captain Powers served his country as a U–2 pilot

during the Cold War;

Whereas on May 1, 1960, Captain Powers’ plane was shot

down while performing a reconnaissance mission over the

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics;

Whereas while Captain Powers was held a prisoner and interrogated by the Soviets, he followed Central Intelligence

Agency regulations and did not reveal classified information about his mission or his airplane;
2

HJ 293 IH

Whereas Captain Powers was tried for espionage by the Soviet Union and imprisoned for twenty-one months;

Whereas Captain Powers was wrongly accused of not fulfilling his mission by citizens of the United States of America while serving his jail sentence in the Soviet Union;

Whereas the Central Intelligence Agency never fully exonerated Captain Powers for his heroics when he was returned to the United States; and

Whereas Captain Powers was posthumously awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross and promoted to the rank of

Captain: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Postmaster General shall issue a commemorative

4 postage stamp in honor of Captain Francis Gary Powers.

5 Such a stamp shall be issued and sold for such period as

6 the Postmaster General shall determine.

Æ
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|U.S. Refinery Catalytic Reforming Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Calendar Day)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|U.S. Refinery Catalytic Reforming Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Calendar Day)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,378,841 | 3,346,457 | 3,246,874 | 3,405,017 | 3,419,407 | 3,392,641 | 3,385,049 | 3,419,464 | 3,463,906 | 3,487,295
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,509,171 | 3,320,353 | 3,285,715 | 3,323,502 | 3,308,735 |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         214,581               2,281,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  400,277                  56,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,500                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  47,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               772,707               2,409,113
<PP&E>                                         685,205                 452,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,108,033               3,431,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,798,364                 631,055
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        64,971                  37,637
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,191,495               2,763,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,108,033               3,431,804
<SALES>                                          2,367                  38,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,342,352                 294,387
<CGS>                                           34,000                  50,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  839,582                 695,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,112                (38,965)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (950,974)             (2,096,412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (950,974)             (2,096,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (950,974)             (2,096,412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)                   (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)                   (.56)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

P1aintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-053-01-H

ZACHIUS MARQUIS STEVENS (1),

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI]ILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U'S.C.

$ 636OX1), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated Asgo$ 72 ,2022.

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT ruDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00053-H-BQ Document 25 Filed 08/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 41
#### Orimex Trading, Inc., Respondent, v Ben Berman, *264Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis Pecora, J.), entered on August 21, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied defendant’s motion to vacate a default and to vacate and set aside the default judgment on the ground of newly discovered evidence, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

It is within the IAS court’s discretion to determine whether or not a party has shown a reasonable excuse for a default *(Sanders & Assocs. v Hague Dev. Corp.,*100 AD2d 964, 965). Here, defendant’s excuse for his default was that he was not properly served. The record supports the IAS court’s conclusion to the contrary, and we find no reason to disturb that conclusion on appeal.

The motion to vacate the 1972 judgment, based on evidence that an employee of plaintiff submitted false testimony in an affidavit filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District in a previous Federal litigation that was dismissed for lack of Federal jurisdiction, is also unavailing. Even if we were to find the purportedly newly discovered evidence offered by defendant relevant, defendant has not presented a reasonable explanation for the 17-year delay in bringing these matters to the attention of the court *(see, DiIorio v Gibson & Cushman,*161 AD2d 532, *amended*166 AD2d 334). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 1975-014, 2061-004, 2777-007, 2778-005-Idaho]


Idaho Power Company; Notice of Extension of Time

November 15, 2000.
    By letter dated November 8, 2000, the Department of the Interior 
(Interior) requested an extension of time for the filing of comments in 
response to the Commission's Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis 
and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and 
Prescriptions issued July 14, 2000, and extended August 9, 2000. 
Interior stated that because of the scope of the projects, staff 
limitations, and time constraints, additional time is needed in order 
to prepare and file its comments.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of 
time for the filing of comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, 
and prescriptions is granted to and including November 17, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29947 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Cheryl Ideman, Appellant, v James Ideman, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and matter remitted to Ontario County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner mother appeals from an order of Family Court summarily awarding permanent custody of the parties’ child to respondent father as a consequence of her unauthorized *1002removal of the child from the State in violation of a prior temporary custody and visitation order. Petitioner contends that the court erred in failing to conduct a hearing. We agree.

The court may not make an initial determination of permanent custody without conducting a factual hearing to determine the fundamental issue of the best interests of the child *(Mosesku v Mosesku,*108 AD2d 795; *Matter of Blake v Blake,*106 AD2d 916; *Allen v Kriesel,*87 AD2d 992). Custody determinations may not be made on the basis of allegations contained in conflicting affidavits *(Bellinger v Bellinger,*109 AD2d 1104; *Bowman v Bowman,*19 AD2d 857). Although removal of the child from the jurisdiction can result in denial or loss of custody, as can a parent’s violation of a court order, removal of the child or violation of a court order is not a ground for depriving the parent (or the child) of the right to a hearing before the issue of custody is determined. Removal of the child from the jurisdiction is only one factor in determining the relative fitness of the parents, which constitutes the basis for the ultimate and " '[paramount’ ” determination of what custody arrangement is in the child’s best interests *(Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55*NY2d 89, 94; *Matter of Nehra v Uhlar,*43 NY2d 242, 248-251). Indeed, the Court of Appeals has labeled a parent’s "abduction, elopement or other defiance of legal process” as a relatively minor factor in the best interests determination *(Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, supra,*at 94; *see, Matter of Nehra v Uhlar, supra,*at 251). We therefore reverse the order, direct that a Law Guardian be appointed for the child, and remit the matter for a custody hearing to be conducted by a different Judge *(see, Matter of Blake v Blake, supra,*at 916-917). Temporary custody is to be continued with the father pending the determination of permanent custody *(see, Mosesku v Mosesku, supra).*(Appeal from order of Ontario County Family Court, Harvey, J.—custody.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
Ameritas Life Insurance Corp.


 


MINIMUM PREMIUM RIDER


 


This rider is made a part of the policy and is based
on the application and payment of the premium. This rider is subject to the terms and provisions of the policy and this
rider. If there is a conflict between the terms of the policy and the terms of this rider, the rider language controls. This rider
may not be cancelled and will terminate when the policy to which it is attached terminates or the maturity date.


 


Subject to the terms and conditions stated below,
this rider changes the minimum initial premium requirement to the amount shown on your rider schedule. Additional premium
requirements provided in the policy are unaffected by this rider.


 


RIDER CHARGE. Beginning with the policy
date, each month a rider charge will be assessed based on the accumulation value at that time and the charge shown on
your rider schedule. The rider charge will be deducted pro-rata from the fixed account and subaccounts.
When your rider is issued, the current charge applies. After the first policy year, we reserve the right to change
the current charge at any time; however, your charge will never exceed the maximum charge.


 


WAIVER OF CHARGES. On each policy anniversary,
we will compare your accumulation value to the waiver threshold stated on your rider schedule. In the event
your accumulation value exceeds the waiver threshold, we will waive charges for this rider. Once waived, the charges
for this rider will be waived for all subsequent policy years.


 


AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP.


 


 


	[	SPECIMEN	SPECIMEN	]
	   President	Secretary   


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


MPR 8-15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00012-Z-BR-1

§

FRANCES OCEGUEDA §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

FRANCES OCEGUEDA, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining FRANCES OCEGUEDA under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that FRANCES OCEGUEDA be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) -

POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and have sentence imposed accordingly. After

being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: June 27, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00012-Z-BR Document 35 Filed 06/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 79
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Pension Partners 1994-D, Ltd., was in the process of
liquidation as of March 31, 2000 and as such is governed by liquidation basis
accounting.  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Swift Energy Pension Partners 1994-D, Ltd's Statement of Net Assets in Process
of Liquidation and Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Process of Liquidation
contained in its Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,917
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,502
<PP&E>                                         1,801,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,824,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,457
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        19,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,843
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                               AG ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                  EXHIBIT 11.01
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended December 31,
                                                     -------------------------------
                                                          1996            1995
                                                        -------          -------
<S>                                                     <C>              <C>    
Weighted average common shares outstanding
  during the period                                       5,948            5,843
Common share equivalents                                      0              362
                                                        -------          -------
Total                                                     5,948            6,205
                                                        =======          =======
Net income (loss)                                       ($1,295)         $ 2,384
                                                        =======          =======
Net income (loss) per share                             ($ 0.22)         $  0.38
                                                        =======          =======
</TABLE>


                                       15
Exhibit 32.03

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Financial and Operating Officer and principal
financial officer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The
Millburn World Resource Trust (the "Trust"), certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Trust.


/s/ Gregg Buckbinder
--------------------
Gregg Buckbinder
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
May 13, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 32. 1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valrico Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John E. Bob Mclean, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ John E. Bob Mclean
President and CEO
November 15, 2004