alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BTXN 099 (rev. 12/14)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Highland Capital Management, L.P. Case No.: 19−34054−sgj11

 Chapter No.: 11

Debtor(s) Civil Case No.: 3:22−CV−02051−B

CLO HoldCo, Ltd.

Appellant(s)

 vs.

Marc Kirschner, the Litigation Trustee for the Highland

Litigation SubTrust

Appellee(s)

TRANSMITTAL AND CERTIFICATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL

 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010, the appeal filed on 8/31/2022 regarding [3457] Order

denying motion motion to ratify second amended proof of claim and expunging claim (related document # 3178)

Entered on 8/17/2022 by CLO HoldCo, Ltd. in the above styled bankruptcy case is hereby transmitted to the U.S.

District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

 This record on appeal contains all items listed on the attached index, and is in compliance with Rule 8010 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

 All further pleadings or inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to the U.S. District Clerk's Office until

such time as the appeal is fully processed in the U.S. District Court.

 The above referenced record was delivered to the U.S. District Clerk's Office on October 18, 2022.

DATED: 10/18/22 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/J. Blanco, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:22-cv-02051-B Document 12 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3337
### Rivero, Maria 

### (OSn

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: DonPevsner@aol.com Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:36 PM Rivero, Maria (OST) NEWTEXT FOR DOCKET DOT-OST-2012-0109-00356 (SUBSTITUTE FOR PRIOR TEXT)

(1)The anonymous Correspondence Motion in this Docket, Item DOT-OST-2012-0109-0033, is a transparent attemptto smearthe Petitioner/Complainantwhile conveniently requesting DOT to dismissthe Petition/Complaint at issue without considering its merits, on totally-spurious grounds. As part ofthis scurrilous strategy, the author has not only neglected to provide his own name, but also that of his employer (most probably Delta Air Lines, Inc.). If he is in fact a lawyerfor Delta, he is following the old and contemptible maxim of: 'Whenyou have the lawon your side, argue it. When you have the facts on your side, argue them. When you have neither, attack your opponent." Forthe record, in reply to this disgraceful Correspondencefiling: (a)Petitioner/Complainant has been a Member ofThe Florida Bar (#115778) since June, 1969. It is true that his · membership status is currently Inactive, but only because he no longer resides in Florida (since January, 2005) and no longer practices lawthere. (b)He is totally entitled to represent himselfas the lawyerthat he is, and has been for43 years at this writing. The alleged precedents cited in the anonymous smearfiling are clearly not applicable to his actions in this Docket. (c)He does not need lectures in civilityfrom an anonymous Commenterwho appears to be nothing more than a tool for an unscrupulous airline. Delta Air Lines' Managing Director-GovernmentAffairs and Associate General Counsel, AlexanderVan der Bellen, has directly implied in Delta's Answerto Petitioner's Petitionfor Rulemaking and Third-Party Complaint that Petitioner/Complainantwas trying to blackmail Delta in orderto receive a paltry $150 airline ticket change penaltywaiver, rather than attempting to cure a manifest industrywrong as practiced by Delta. If DOT believes that he has been inordinately intemperate in his prior language, in view ofthis rank insultto his character, let DOT say so to Petitioner/Complainant itself. Petitioner/Complainant's 40-year record ofpro bonopublico practice at the CAB and DOT is notfor sale to Delta (orto anyone else) for any amount on Earth, let alone $150. (d)lt is hereby requested that DOT require the anonymous Correspondence authorto disclose his identity, and that of his employer, at once. Otherwise, the Motion should be promptly strickenfrom this Docket. (e)Then, for obvious reasons, DOT should denythe Motion at issue.

1
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 7

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States allowing

an item veto in appropriations bills.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ARCHER (for himself, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr.

BUNNING, Mr. BURTON, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. COBLE, Mr. COMBEST, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. COX, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. FISH, Mr. GALLO, Mr. GILLMOR,

Mr. HALL of Texas, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. JOHNSON of

Texas, Mr. KYL, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr.

MCMILLAN, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. QUILLEN, Mr. RAMSTAD,

Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. UPTON, Mr. WOLF, Mr. ZELIFF,

Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. PETRI, Mr.

GALLEGLY, Mr. GOSS, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. STUMP, Mr. CONDIT, Mr.

YOUNG of Florida, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. SAXTON, and Mr. DELAY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States allowing an item veto in appropriations bills.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol-
2

HJ 7 IH

1 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con2 stitution, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes

3 as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legisla4 tures of three-fourths of the several States:

5 ‘‘ARTICLE—

6 ‘‘SECTION 1. The President shall have the power to

7 disapprove any appropriation or provision and approve any

8 other appropriation or provision in the same appropriation

9 bill. In such case he shall, in signing the bill, designate

10 the appropriations and provisions disapproved, and shall

11 return a copy of such appropriations and provisions, with

12 his objections, to the House in which the bill shall have

13 originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had

14 as in the case of other bills disapproved by the President.

15 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall be inoperative unless

16 it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Con17 stitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

18 States within seven years from the date of its submis19 sion.’’.

Æ
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 February6, 2019

 

 

WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn:AJ Sfarra

375Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

NewYork, NY 10152

 

RE:        Annual Statement as to Compliance

              WFCM 2015 C29

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C29,as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB(the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereofthat:

 

a.       Areview of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilledall obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

 

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Northeast Indiana
 Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003 as
 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
 "Report"), I, Randy J. Sizemore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
 certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



 By: /s/ RANDY J. SIZEMORE
 Name:  Randy J. Sizemore
 Chief Financial Officer
 May 12, 2003

                                                                             20.
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 26317.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 18, 1953.

. C. L. Harris, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the sale of whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, sixty days in jail and a fine of $1,000.

Inspector Baxter, of the Liquor Control Board, testified that he called a certain telephone number in the city of Lubbock, from a card which had come into his possession, and asked to speak to Jean, whose name appeared on the card; that the woman’s voice identified herself as Jean; that he then told her he wanted to buy a pint of whiskey and made an appointment to meet her. The witness stated that he and Inspector Hood proceeded to the rendezvous and there purchased a pint of whiskey from the appellant and then placed her under arrest.

Inspector Hood corroborated Baxter’s testimony as to the purchase from appellant.

It was stipulated that Lubbock County was a dry area.

Appellant, testifying in her own behalf, stated that on the night in question she received a telephone call from a man who identified himself as Bill Stewart; that she had been having dates with Stewart; and that when he suggested that she get some whiskey- and meet. -him, - she agreed. She testified that she borrowed a bottle of whiskey from a friend, and when she arrived at the appointed place, Baxter walked up to her car, took the whiskey out of her hand, and pitched $5 over in the automobile.

If this testimony raised an issue, it was resolved against appellant by the jury’s verdict.

Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the dry status of Lubbock County. He overlooks the stipulation entered into in open court.

We find the evidence sufficient; and no ■reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1018

To require the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, in meeting the needs of the National Aeronautics and Space

Administration for additional facilities, to select abandoned and

underutilized facilities in depressed communities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

A BILL

To require the Administrator of the National Aeronautics

and Space Administration, in meeting the needs of the

National Aeronautics and Space Administration for additional facilities, to select abandoned and underutilized

facilities in depressed communities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act shall be cited as the ‘‘National Aeronautics

5 and Space Administration Decentralization Act of 1993.’’
2

HR 1018 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF ABANDONED AND UNDERUTILIZED BUILD2 INGS, GROUNDS, AND FACILITIES.

3 In meeting the needs of the National Aeronautics and

4 Space Administration for additional facilities, the Admin5 istrator shall select abandoned and underutilized build6 ings, grounds, and facilities in depressed communities that

7 can be converted to National Aeronautics and Space Ad8 ministrator facilities at a reasonable cost, as determined

9 by the Administrator.

10 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

11 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘depressed com12 munities’’ means rural and urban communities that are

13 relatively depressed, in terms of age of housing, extent of

14 poverty, growth of per capita income, extent of unemploy15 ment, job lag, or surplus labor.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2019

No. 04-18-00917-CV

Ziaunnisa K. LODHI,

Appellant

v.

Shah A. HAQUE,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI04290

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion to Allow Appellant to Personally Argue is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on August 12, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
#### PARKER v. STATE.

No. 22413.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1943.

M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for swindling; punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception or statement of facts are brought forward. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 4:22-cr-00276-O Document 31 Filed 10/26/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 58
Case 4:22-cr-00276-O Document 31 Filed 10/26/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 59
H. J. Res. 417

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Joint Resolution

Providing for temporary extension of the application of the final paragraph of

section 10 of the Railway Labor Act with respect to the dispute between the

Soo Line Railroad Company and certain of its employees.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PROHIBITION.

The final paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act

(45 U.S.C. 160) shall apply and be extended through February

28, 1995, with respect to the dispute referred to in Executive

Order No. 12925 of August 29, 1994. During this extension period

no change, except by agreement, shall be made by the rail carrier,

the Soo Line Railroad Company, or by the employees of such carrier

represented by the United Transportation Union, in the conditions

out of which the dispute arose as such conditions existed before

July 14, 1994.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Official Journal C 235/17 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6517 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 235

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6517 June 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 235/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 235/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 11 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 235/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 235/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
April 19, 2017

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | First Mining Finance Corp. (the
      Company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                      
|    | Consent of Expert                               
|    |                                                 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by
reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2016.

I, Dino Pilotto, P.Eng., of JDS Energy & Mining Inc.,
hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my
involvement in the preparation of the following technical report:

Preliminary Economic Assessment for
the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada dated October 7, 2016 (the
Technical Report).

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ Dino
      Pilotto, P.Eng.Dino Pilotto, P.Eng.Engineering ManagerJDS Energy & Mining Inc.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 423

Designating February 27, 1995, as ‘‘John Steinbeck Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 1994

Mr. FARR of California introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating February 27, 1995, as ‘‘John Steinbeck Day’’.

Whereas John Steinbeck has brought fame and honor to the

United States as a distinguished writer;

Whereas Steinbeck’s fiction is representative of the vitality

and unique qualities of the people of the United States;

Whereas people from around the world are attracted to the

United States to renew memories of Steinbeck’s novels

and visit the locales vividly portrayed in ‘‘Cannery Row’’,

‘‘The Pastures of Heaven’’, ‘‘Of Mice and Men’’, ‘‘East

of Eden’’, ‘‘The Red Pony’’, and ‘‘Travels With Charlie’’;

Whereas Steinbeck was awarded the Pulitzer Prize Fiction

Award in 1940 for ‘‘The Grapes of Wrath’’;
2

•HJ 423 IH

Whereas John Steinbeck was awarded the Nobel Prize for

Literature in 1962;

Whereas John Steinbeck has been honored by the United

States with a Medal of Freedom from President Lyndon

Johnson, a United States Postal Service Commemorative

Stamp, and the American Gold Medallion issued by the

United States Mint; and

Whereas February 27 is the anniversary of the birth of John

Steinbeck: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That February 27, 1995, the anniversary of the birth of

4 John Steinbeck, is designated as ‘‘John Steinbeck Day’’,

5 and the President is authorized and requested to issue a

6 proclamation calling on the people of the United States

7 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and

8 activities.

Æ
DEI'ARTMENT OF TRANSI'ORTATION

14910-13-1'] J.

:<.lNC\JllJW>JCCS

QlJHl<GSYMllOl

Fedeui Aviation Administration

14 CFR I'a<l 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0418; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-020-AD; Amendme

11:>2.00- 'i2010V'{~Ol l'-/odtli7Wd'0

39-*****'AIl2ij99 **_H] dPl01

I (p 20 I 2-010 -0'-1-0&

IUN 2J20-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mo

ERJ 190 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

origmated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

NITIAlSiSl(}

~OUTI.'G ,YMBOl

ANM-7 iTlAlS'S,G

ATIO

1

017-'1'7

'~~TI4

ROIJrrNG SYMBOL

The unsafe condition is cracking and deformation of wing spar and rib flanges, which

During routine inspection procedures on the wing assembly line it was

identified the possibility of cracks and deformation developing during

assembly on the internal wing spars and rib flanges, causing a safe[ty)

margin reduction.

* * * * * * *

T'ALS'SlG

~OUT!NG SYMOOL

-100

LNlTl 's,oJ

OA E

'},; {O

could result in loss of structural integrity of the wing. We are issuing this AD to require ot !NOS DOL

actions to COITCCt the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective [insert date 35 days after date of publication in th
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael DiCarluccio, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant *510from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered May 5, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to suppress physical evidence and statements to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court lacked jurisdiction to accept his guilty plea in the absence of the filing, by the prosecutor, of a special information pursuant to CPL 200.60 alleging a prior conviction. We disagree. The prosecutor’s failure was merely a procedural defect or irregularity which was waived by the defendant’s voluntary guilty plea *(see, People v Gill,*109 AD2d 419; *People v Guiliano,*52 AD2d 240).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence,. Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Case 3:22-cr-00329-K Document 15 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 33