alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
    GOLD INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
    REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
    ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                                            495,928
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   4,144,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                     6,062,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               11,327,326
<PP&E>                                                          4,971,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  3,981,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 13,337,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1,605,455
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                        6,569,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      4,255,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   13,337,592
<SALES>                                                        13,404,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               13,404,835
<CGS>                                                           9,720,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   9,720,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                2,945,477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   750,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      298,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               452,583
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      452,583
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         .15



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,420,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (5,658,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,828,000
<PP&E>                                      33,780,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,702,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,088,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       58,236,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    62,997,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (183,316,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,088,000
<SALES>                                     49,419,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,419,000
<CGS>                                       36,223,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                30,635,00
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,430,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,464,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (26,464,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (26,464,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.73)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, 0 C
. 20460

Ann Mari e Savini Regu latory Specialist Harcro s Ch e mica ls Inc. 5200 Speaker Road Kansas Ci ty , KS 66 1 06 

### MAR 

### Z '• 2015

Re: Request for extension to s ubmit fmal report for repeat fish and d a phnid studies for Dgluco-heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi
. )- (CASRN 31138-65

- 5). D ear Ms. Savi ni : EPA has received your March 19, 20 1 5, submiss ion on be ha lf o fHarcros Chemicals , Inc. , ( H arc ros) requesting an extension oftime t o submi t fi nal reports for repeat acute toxici ty testin g for fish and Daphnia for D

- gluco

- heptoni c acid, monosodium salt , (2.xi.)- (CASRN 31138-65

- 5). These studies were required purs uan t to a test rule i ss u ed under section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act on January 7 , 20 11 (76 F R 10 67) (HV P 2). In your l etter , you state that Harcro s is reque s t in g an ex t e n s ion to s ubmit the final reports for th ese studi es on May 31 , 2015, i nstead of the prior approved extens ion date of March 31, 20 1 5. As note d in your l e tter , Harc ro s is reque s ti ng th is n e w extension date because the testing l aboratory has inf o rmed Harcros that they would be unable to deliv er the fina l report pr i or to April 3 1 5 1 • EPA i s grantin g the requested extension to s ubmit th e fin a l repo rt for the repeat acute toxicity tes tin g fo r fish and Daphnia on May 3 1 , 2015. As per Harcros' offe r in its prior extension request to submit preliminary re sults, EPA does not find that necessary, but does e ncourage the submission of the final report as early as possible.

Internet Address (URL) • http./lwww epa gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w i th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100 % Postconsumer
. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Pa p e rIf you have any questions, please contact John Schaeffer by phone, (202) 564-8173 or email, schaeffer.jolm@epa.gov. cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531

Sincerely,**PoJ~** Paul Lewis, Ph.D. Chief Chemical Information and Testing Branch
#### Ex parte LAWLER.

No. 22723.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1943.

Milton K. Norton, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The relator was charged in the justice court of Dallas County with the offense of murder with malice. Bail was fixed by the justice of the peace at $25,000. On the 9th of October, 1943, appellant filed his application in the district court for a writ of habeas corpus, asking for the reduction of bond. Upon a hearing on the writ of habe-as corpus the relator was remanded to custody without bond. From this order remanding him he has perfected this appeal. Since such hearing the grand jury of Dallas County has returned an indictment charging the relator with murder, the indictment having been returned on the 20th day of October, 1943.

The State has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal in which it sets out the return of the indictment as grounds and attaches a certified copy of the same. The question has become moot and the motion will be granted. 21 Tex.Jur. page 489; Ex parte McDonald, Tex.Cr.App., 65 S.W. 188.

Appeal is dismissed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALICIA GUESS , Appellant,

v.
ABERDEEN GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, INC. , a Florida not

- for

- profit corporation,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 139

[ March 29, 202 3 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fif teenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Marni A. Bryson , Judge; L.T. Case No

. 50

- 2020

- CC

003331

- XXXX

- SB

. Morgan L. Weinstein of Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert Rivas of Sachs Sax Caplan, PL, Boc a Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

. Affirmed. See Lloyd S. Meisels, P.A. v. Dobrofsky , 341 So. 3d 1131, 1134

- 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) ( affirming summary judgment where appellant neither responded to the motion for summary judgment nor supplied a hearing transcript on appeal, and recognizing that
, pursuant to Florida R ule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c)(5), the requirement of filing a response is mandatory and
, if one is not filed, rule 1.510(e) “provides discretionary options for the trial court,” including “grant[ing] summary judgment if the motion and supporting materials

– including the facts considered undisputed

– show that the movant is entitled to it”) ; Simmons v. Pub

. Health Tr

. of Miami

- Dade C n ty

. , 338 So. 3d 1057, 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (determining that transcripts of trial court statements meet the rule 1.510(a) requirement that the trial court state on the record the reasons for g ranting or denying summary judgment motion ); Johnson v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. Ams. , 248 So. 3d 1205, 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (observing that although “a lack of a transcript, in and of itself, will not necessarily prohibit appellate review of the evi dence underlying a summary judgment ruling, it could in some cases stymie the fullness of a2 legal argument challenging that ruling on appeal if there is a question about whether the argument was preserved”)

.

G ROSS , C ONNER and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 280

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to protections for persons

changing their names to avoid domestic violence.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 11, 1994

Mr. KLEIN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to protections

for persons changing their names to avoid domestic violence.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) victims of domestic violence face growing

4 harassment from their predators and deserve the

5 highest level of protection from that harassment;

6 and

7 (2) each State should—

8 (A) allow a victim of domestic violence to

9 change names in a manner that keeps the

10 change private and not printed in any public
2

•HCON 280 IH

1 record, with disclosure of the change made

2 only—

3 (i) to bona fide and verified creditors

4 of the victim and to police acting in official

5 capacity; and

6 (ii) when accompanied by immediate

7 notice to the victim;

8 (B) set the cost of changes in name for do9 mestic violence victims at a minimum and pro10 vide waivers of that charge for those victims

11 unable to pay it; and

12 (C) provide that changes in name for such

13 a victim can be accomplished in a short period

14 of time so that the victim is protected as soon

15 as possible.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



US Oncology, Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, R. Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ R. Dale Ross                            
|--------------------------------------------
|R. Dale Ross                                
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology, Inc.



August 13, 2003
# Official Journal C 11/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 11 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5914 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 11

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5914 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 011/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 011/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Institute of Innovation and Technology |
| 2016/C 011/2 | Call for proposals for the establishment of Knowledge and Innovation Communities of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) | 2 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 011/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7890 — La Compagnie des Cartes Carburant (Edenred)/UNION TANK Eckstein) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2016/C 011/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7901 — COFRA Holding/Binder Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Institute of Innovation and Technology

2016/C 011/2

Call for proposals for the establishment of Knowledge and Innovation Communities of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)

2

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 011/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7890 — La Compagnie des Cartes Carburant (Edenred)/UNION TANK Eckstein) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2016/C 011/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7901 — COFRA Holding/Binder Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 3:22-cv-03283-C-BK Document 15 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
1

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda

November 6, 2014

1:00 – 1:10 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance Office

1:10 – 1:15 New Business 

Certification of August 7, 2014 Meeting Minutes

1:15 – 2:05 Discussion of the Role of Cyber Insurance in Cybersecurity 

Presentation by Adam Sedgewick on National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework

Presentation by Catherine Mulligan (Zurich N.A.) on Security & Privacy 

Insurance Landscape

Discussion

2:05 – 2:15 Break

2:15 – 3:00 Discussion of the Affordability of Auto Insurance 

Presentation by J. Robert Hunter (Consumer Federation of America)

on the Cost of Mandatory Auto Insurance for Lower Income 

Households

Discussion

3:00 – 3:50 Discussion of International Supervisory Standards for Insurers, 

Including Capital

Presentation by Tom Finnell (Federal Insurance Office)

Discussion of Workstreams of the International Association of 

Insurance Supervisors

Discussion of Insurance Capital Standards (ICS) and the 

U.S. Proposal on ICS 

Discussion of EU-U.S. Insurance Project

3:50 - 4:00 Discussion of Subcommittees

4:00 Adjourn

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Federal Insurance Office

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance 

Agenda 

September 23, 2019 

1:30 – 1:45 pm Welcome & Opening Remarks 

Dan Glaser, President & Chief Executive Officer, Marsh & McLennan Companies

1:45 – 2:15 pm Update on Federal Insurance Office Activities

Steven Seitz, Director, Federal Insurance Office

2:15 – 2:45 pm Update from Subcommittee on Addressing the Protection Gap through PublicPrivate Partnerships and Other Mechanisms

Update on subcommittee’s work from subcommittee co-chairs

Committee discussion 

2:45 – 3:00 pm Break 

3:00 – 3:30 pm Update from Subcommittee on FIO’s International Work 

Update on subcommittee’s work from subcommittee co-chairs

Committee discussion 

Update from Subcommittee on the Availability of Insurance Products

Update on subcommittee’s work from subcommittee co-chairs

Committee discussion 

Committee Presentation of Advice and Recommendations to FIO

New Business 

3:30 – 4:00 pm

4:00– 4:15 pm

4:15 – 4:30 pm 

4:30 pm Adjourn
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7162

GLEN WAYNE STAPLETON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-406-7-jpj) Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004 Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glen Wayne Stapleton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. SeeFed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Glen Wayne Stapleton seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his motion for relief from judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on February 3, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on July 6, 2004. * Because Stapleton failed to file a timely notice of appeal, or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We further deny Stapleton’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts- 3 - and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 TheHonorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1818

___________ John H. Bynum, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. McElroy Metal; Monarch Metal * Buildings, Inc.; Steve Miller, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 19, 2001 Filed: March 6, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John Bynum appeals the District Court’s 1 adversegrant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude summary judgment was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance 

Agenda

March 30, 2012

Meeting will begin promptly at 1:00 p.m. and conclude not later than 4:30 p.m.

1:00 – 1:15 Opening Remarks

1:15-1:45 Member Introductions

1:45-2:05 Presentation of Ethics Guidelines 

(Dept. of the Treasury, General Counsel’s Office)

2:05-2:15 Appointment of Committee Chairperson

2:15-2:25 Discussion of Committee Charter and By-Laws 

2:25-2:40 Break

2:40-3:40 Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

- Role of Committee

- Identification of topics of interest

- Work process and deliverables

3:40-4:20 Federal Insurance Office – Recent Developments

- EU—U.S. Insurance Dialogue

- International Association of Insurance Supervisors

- Federal Government Insurance Forum

4:20-4:30 Discussion of future meeting dates

Adjourn
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 64

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States respecting

the right to decent and affordable housing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States respecting the right to decent and affordable housing.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

•HJ 64 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica2 tion:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘All citizens of the United States shall have a right

5 to decent and affordable housing, which right shall not

6 be denied or abridged by the United States or any State.’’.

Æ