alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-10976

Summary Calendar

 

YOLANDA WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CINTAS CORPORATION; EXPECT FIRST AID CORPORATION,

A Division of Cintas Corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-668

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In November 2000, Yolanda Williams (“Plaintiff”) executed an

employment agreement with Cintas Corporation and Expect First Aid

Corporation (“Defendants”) which contained a compulsory

arbitration clause requiring all disputes regarding the

employment to be submitted to binding arbitration. In March

2003, Plaintiff initiated her first lawsuit against Defendants

asserting claims for racial discrimination and retaliation in

violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Defendants moved to
No. 05-10976

-2-

compel arbitration and dismiss the lawsuit in April 2003, and in

June 2003, the district court entered an order granting

Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. The parties proceeded

to arbitration under the supervision of the American Arbitration

Association. In January 2005, the arbitrator issued his award

denying all of Plaintiff’s requested relief. In March 2005, the

arbitrator denied Plaintiff’s request for modification of the

arbitrator’s award. In April 2005, Plaintiff initiated her

second lawsuit against Defendants, once again claiming

discrimination and retaliation under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. §

1981. On motion of Defendants, the district court dismissed

Plaintiff’s second complaint for failure to state a claim upon

which relief could be granted under Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff

appealed to this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

the reply brief and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum

opinion and order filed July 15, 2005, we affirm the final

judgment entered by the district court on July 25, 2005.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Floor 401
South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, and CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC31 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do
hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31,
2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGOLeslie HaytonManaging DirectorWells Fargo Bank  LOGO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rhonda Underwood (202) 314-6065.

Dated: November 17, 2000.

Rhonda Underwood,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-29927 Filed 11-17-00; 3:35 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSE E. CEDILLO, §

TDCJ No. 2207245, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1767-K

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, 

the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

Signed September 9th, 2022.

____________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01767-K-BN Document 7 Filed 09/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
Case 6:22-cv-00049-H Document 94 Filed 02/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2197
#### BOTT v. STATE.

No. 25969.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appear regular; and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                                |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |   |
| May 15, 2007                                                            |   |
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0495

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JESSE JAMES FINLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including March 14, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 7 2022

02/07/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0495
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK et al.,

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

 v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States et al., 

 Defendants.

PROPOSED ORDER

Came on this day Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, and the Court 

having read the motion and pleadings on file is of the opinion that the motion is meritorious and 

should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants may file their responses to 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 140) and to Intervenor-Plaintiff BlackHawk 

Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 

144), as well as their cross-motion for summary judgment, on or before February 13, 2023.

Dated: ___________________, 2023 ________________________________

REED O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 148-1 Filed 01/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2783
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James Murdakes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                   /s/ James Murdakes
                                   ------------------------
                                   James Murdakes
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   November 8, 2002
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 1 of 23 PageID 3
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 2 of 23 PageID 4
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 3 of 23 PageID 5
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 4 of 23 PageID 6
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 5 of 23 PageID 7
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 6 of 23 PageID 8
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 7 of 23 PageID 9
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 8 of 23 PageID 10
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 9 of 23 PageID 11
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 10 of 23 PageID 12
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 11 of 23 PageID 13
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 12 of 23 PageID 14
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 13 of 23 PageID 15
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 14 of 23 PageID 16
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 15 of 23 PageID 17
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 16 of 23 PageID 18
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 17 of 23 PageID 19
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 18 of 23 PageID 20
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 19 of 23 PageID 21
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 20 of 23 PageID 22
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 21 of 23 PageID 23
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 22 of 23 PageID 24
Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 2 Filed 09/01/22 Page 23 of 23 PageID 25
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of July 1,2015 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as TrustAdvisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator,as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust2015-NXS2, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS2

**(WFCM 2015-NXS2)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2016 to December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance withthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the term of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in allmaterial respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure tofulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and thenature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2017
(logo) CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

 

**Annual Statement as to Compliance**

**For the Period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

** **

** **

**COMM 2015-CCRE23**

 

 

In accordance with Item 1123 ofRegulation AB and with the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the Pooling andServicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the“CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity asSpecial Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to thefollowing:

 

(A)               a review of CWCAM’s activities during thepreceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and ofCWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’ssupervision; and

 

(B)               that, to the best of such officer’sknowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

 

/s/ James P. Shevlin

James P. Shevlin

President/Chief OperatingOfficer

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue | Suite500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_____________________ _____ 09
- 18
- 00267
- CR 09
- 18
- 00268
- CR

__________________________

____________________________________________________________ _____ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No s . 16
- 26420 and 16
- 26421

_________________________________________________________________ ORDER Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal s are frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine the appellate reco rd and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Kevin Kamper, Appellant V. The State of Texas, AppelleeAppellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We
h ereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on

or before Friday, January 18, 2019

. See id. , 436 S.W.3d at 321

- 22

. ORDER ENTERED January 8, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00112-CR

TEVIN SHERARD ELLIOTT,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-1543-C2

ORDER

Tevin Sherard Elliott’s motion for rehearing is denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed May 28, 2015
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1048

To amend the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. CLEMENT (for himself, Mr. COOPER, Mr. GORDON, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr.

FALEOMAVAEGA, and Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings

Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND REFERENCE.

4 (A) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

5 ‘‘Vehicle Damage Disclosure Act of 1993 ’’.

6 (b) REFERENCE.—Whenever in this Act an amend7 ment or repeal is expressed in terms of an amendment

8 to, or repeal of, a section or other provision, the reference

9 shall be considered to be made to a section or other provi-
2

•HR 1048 IH

1 sion of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings

2 Act.

3 SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

4 Section 401 (49 U.S.C. 1981) is amended—

5 (1) by inserting after ‘‘reliability;’’ the follow6 ing: ‘‘that a designation by a State on the title that

7 such vehicle has previously sustained major damage

8 or has been rebuilt after being declared ‘junk’ or

9 ‘salvage’ is an important factor in evaluating the

10 value and safety of such automobile;’’, and

11 (2) by inserting before the period the following:

12 ‘‘or vehicles for which States have previously issued

13 a title brand indicating prior severe damage’’.

14 SEC. 3. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS UPON TRANSFER OF

15 OWNERSHIP OF A MOTOR VEHICLE.

16 Section 408 (49 U.S.C. 1988) is amended—

17 (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ‘‘on the title’’

18 after ‘‘disclosure’’, and

19 (2) by adding at the end the following:

20 ‘‘(h)(1) Any motor vehicle the ownership of which is

21 transferred may not be licensed for use in any State unless

22 the State discloses on the title whether records readily ac23 cessible to it indicate—

24 ‘‘(A) whether the vehicle was previously issued

25 a title that bore any word or symbol signifying that
3

•HR 1048 IH

1 the vehicle was ‘salvage’, ‘junk’, ‘reconstructed’, or

2 ‘rebuilt’ or that it has been damaged by flood, and

3 ‘‘(B) if it was issued such a title, which State

4 first issued such a title.

5 ‘‘(2) The Secretary shall—

6 ‘‘(A) not later than 90 days after the date of

7 the enactment of the Vehicle Damage Disclosure Act

8 of 1993, prescribe by rule the manner in which a

9 State shall disclose the information described in

10 paragraph (1)(A) and the manner in which such in11 formation shall be retained, and

12 ‘‘(B) not later than 12 months after the date

13 of the enactment of such Act, in consultation with

14 the task force established under section 140(a) of

15 the Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 (15 U.S.C. 2401

16 note), prescribe the manner in which and the cir17 cumstances under which States shall signify that a

18 vehicle has previously sustained major damage.’’.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 22 , 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00639

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.A.H.R., Et al.,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 00377

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s brief is due on January 11, 2016. No further extension will be granted.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2018 of Sharing Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, John Thatch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: July 30, 2018

By: 

/s/ John ThatchJohn ThatchChief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sharing Services, Inc. and will be retained by Sharing Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 27, 2010 

s0920 

Order 

 

September 27, 2010 

141139 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141139 

 COA: 296289 

Ogemaw CC: 09-003180-FH; 

 09-003172-FH 

JEREMY JASON JENNINGS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.