alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 415 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res. 415

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  Designating the week beginning October 16, 1994, as ``National Penny 
Charity Week''.

Whereas 170 billion pennies--$1.7 billion--are circulating in the 
  economy;
Whereas financial institutions, merchants, and retail establishments 
  are reporting a shortage of pennies;
Whereas this shortage is a result of American people hoarding their 
  pennies;
Whereas, during fiscal year 1994, the United States Mint will spend 
  $1.64 million to produce 13.3 billion pennies in order to counter the 
  effect of hoarding;
Whereas donating hoarded pennies to charities provides the charities 
  with funds, diminishes the shortage of pennies, lowers the demand on 
  the United States Mint to produce additional pennies, and ultimately 
  saves the United States Treasury money;
Whereas Penny Lover's of America is a not-for-profit charitable 
  organization that seeks to promote character, scholarship, and 
  patriotism among America's youth by collecting penny donations to 
  finance their educational pursuits;
Whereas Penny Lover's of America is celebrating its 10th anniversary 
  this year by conducting a penny recycling campaign; and
Whereas ``National Penny Charity Week'' coincides with Penny Lover's of 
  America's ``National Penny Campaign Recycling Project'' both of which 
  will assist in alleviating the penny shortage and raise funds for 
  charitable and community causes: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the week 
of October 16, 1994, as ``National Penny Charity Week'' and to call on 
the people of the United States to observe such week with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities, including the donation of pennies to 
charities, particularly to those which provide direct services to the 
Nation's underprivileged and disadvantaged population, and to worthy 
community causes.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Skill Standards Board

# AGENCY:

National Skill Standards Board.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Skill Standards Board was established by an Act of Congress, the National Skill Standards Act, Title V, Pub. L. 103-227. The 25-member National Skill Standards Board will serve as a catalyst and be responsible for the development and implementation of a voluntary national system of skills standards and certification through voluntary partnerships which have the full and balanced participation of business, labor, education, civil rights organizations and other key groups.

*Time & Place:*                         The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to approximately 12 p.m. on Friday, December 8, 2000, at The Holiday Inn Select Hotel, 480 King St., Alexandria, VA 22314, in the Carlyle Ballroom. (703) 549-6080.                    

*Agenda:*                         The agenda for the Board Meeting will include: An update from the Board's committees; presentations from representatives of the Education and Training Voluntary Partnership (E&TVP), Hospitality and Tourism Skill Standards Council (HTSSC), Manufacturing Skill Standards Council (MSSC) and Sales & Service Voluntary Partnership (S&SVP).                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m., is open to the public. Seating is limited and will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Seats will be reserved for the media. Individuals with disabilities should contact Leslie Donaldson at (202) 254-8628 if special accommodations are needed.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dave Wilcox, Executive Deputy Director at (202) 254-8628.

Signed at Washington, DC, 15th day of November, 2000.

Edie West,

Executive Director, National Skill Standards Board.

[FR Doc. 00-29749 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 21, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00521

- CV

Tony Davis, Appellant

v.

Deutsche Bank National Trust; Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital 1, Inc.; Saxon Mortgage, Inc.; Mortgage Electronic Registr ation Systems, Inc. (MERS) ; John Cottrell ; and Locke, Lord & Bissell, Attorneys at Law, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay

for the clerk’s record ; has not submitted a status report regarding this appeal , and, accordingly,

has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considere d, adjudged and ordered that

the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. IT IS FURTHER ordered that the appellant

pay all costs relating to this appeal both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2144** 

CHARLIE RICHARDSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. RAY MABUS , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 01207

- AW )

Submitted : January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Charlie Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields

Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charlie Richardson appeals the district court ’ s or der granting Ray Mabus’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, on Richardson’s discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 ( West 2003 & Supp. 2012 ), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. A. §§ 621 to 634 ( West 2008 & Supp. 2013 )
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court ’s order
. Richa rdson v. Mabus , No. 8 :13

- cv - 01207

- AW (D. Md . Aug. 16 , 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
23 Figure 1 23

24



### 2006

- 2008 Lead Monitored Design Values 25

26

2724 Figure 225 Figure 3

Location and Emissions of Stationary Sources in Madison County26 Figure 4

Proximi ty of Emission Sources to Nearby Monitor27 Figure 5

Location of NL Industries/ Ta ra c orp Superfund Site28 Figure 6

Madison County Population Density and U rbanization29 Figure 7

Madison County Total Population by Municipality30 Figure 8

Percent of Land Cover by Type in Madison County31 Figure 932 Figure 10

Meteorology

– St. Louis Wind Rose33 Figure 11

Madison County Elevation (Topography)34 Figure 12

Proposed Lead Nonattainment Area, City of Granite City
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
MUFFIN FAYE ANDERSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

KIMBERLY

- CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 1117

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:12

- cv

- 01979

- RAJ, Judge Richard A. Jones.

______________________
ON MOTI ON

______________________

O R D E R
Muffin Faye Anderson moves for leave to file her informal brief out of time.
Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. Anderson’s brief is accepted for filing. Kimberly

- Clark Corporation should calculate the Case: 14-1117 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2014ANDERSON v. KIMBERLY

- CLARK CORPORATION 2

due date for its response brief from the date of filing of this order.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21 Case: 14-1117 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2014
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Endocardial Solutions, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, James W. Bullock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ James W. Bullock    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | James W. Bullock        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 6, 2004          |

 

----
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CITY OF DALLAS;

CITY OF ABILENE;

CITY OF ALLEN;

CITY OF AMARILLO;

CITY OF ARLINGTON;

CITY OF AUSTIN;

CITY OF BEAUMONT;

CITY OF CARROLLTON;

CITY OF DENTON;

CITY OF FORT WORTH;

CITY OF FRISCO;

CITY OF GARLAND;

CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE;

CITY OF HOUSTON;

CITY OF IRVING;

CITY OF LEWISVILLE;

CITY OF McKINNEY;

CITY OF MESQUITE;

CITY OF NACOGDOCHES;

CITY OF PEARLAND;

CITY OF PLANO;

CITY OF ROWLETT;

CITY OF SUGAR LAND;

CITY OF TYLER; and

CITY OF WACO,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

DISNEY DTC, LLC;

HULU, LLC; and

NETFLIX, INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:22-cv-02071-L

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR THE WITHDRAWAL OF

DAVID AUSTIN R. NIMOCKS ON BEHALF OF ALL PLAINTIFFS

Case 3:22-cv-02071-L Document 39-1 Filed 12/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 974
2

CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration David Austin R. Nimocks, counsel for 

Plaintiffs, and his Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel. The Court, having 

reviewed the Motion, finds that the Motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that David Austin R. 

Nimocks be withdrawn as an attorneys of record for Plaintiffs.

It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that electronic notices sent 

in this case to David Austin R. Nimocks shall terminate effective the date of this Order.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the ____ day of December, 2022.

____________________________________

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-02071-L Document 39-1 Filed 12/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 975
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause DA 19-0590

The Petitioners/Appellees in this matter has moved this Court for an extension 

of time in which to file their Answer Brief. Finding good cause therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees Answer Brief in this matter is now 

due on or before Friday, July 31, 2020.

BOARD OF PERSONNEL APPEALS,

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF

ADMINISTRATION, MONTANA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH

AND HUMAN SERVICES

Appellants/Respondents,

vs.

APRIL ARMSTRONG, DAVID R. BARNHILL,

K. AMY PFEIFER, PEGGY PROBASCO, AND

PATRICK QUINN,

Petitioners/Appellees.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 30-DAY BRIEF EXTENSION

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 18 2020

06/18/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0590
Case 3:22-cv-02185-S-BH Document 23 Filed 02/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 99

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States limiting

the number of terms for Members of the House of Representatives

and the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States limiting the number of terms for Members of

the House of Representatives and the Senate.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

HJ 99 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. A person may not be elected as a Rep5 resentative more than six times. A person may not be

6 elected or appointed as a Senator more than two times.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. For purposes of this article, the election

8 of a person to fill a vacancy in the representation of a

9 State in the House of Representatives shall not be in10 cluded in determining the number of times the person has

11 been elected as a Representative if the person fills the va12 cancy for less than two years, and the election or appoint13 ment of a person to fill a vacancy in the representation

14 of a State in the Senate shall not be included in determin15 ing the number of times the person has been elected as

16 a Senator if the person fills the vacancy for less than three

17 years.

18 ‘‘SECTION 3. For purposes of this article, an election

19 which occurs before the date of the ratification of this arti20 cle shall not be included in determining the number of

21 times a person has been elected as a Representative or

22 Senator.’’.

Æ
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3305]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on October 27, 2000, I find that La Paz and Maricopa Counties in the State of Arizona constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding beginning on October 21, 2000 and continuing. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on December 26, 2000, and for loans for economic injury until the close of business on July 27, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P. O. Box 13795, Sacramento, CA 95853-4795. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Gila, Mohave, Pima, Pinal, Yavapai, and Yuma Counties in Arizona, and Imperial, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties in California. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
7.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.687Businesses with credit available elsewhere
8.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
6.750For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 330506. For economic injury the numbers are 9J4400 for Arizona and 9J4500 for California. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: November 2, 2000. Allan I. Hoberman, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 00-29763 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-204-S (01) 

 § 

TERRY LEE YEARLING § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

TERRY LEE YEARLING, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 

(5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to

the 1-Count Indictment, filed on May 24, 2022. After cautioning and examining Defendant Terry Lee 

Yearling under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea 

was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact 

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be 

accepted, and that Defendant Terry Lee Yearling, be adjudged guilty of Possession of a Firearm by a 

Convicted Felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and have sentence imposed 

accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge. 

□ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear 

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

□ The Government does not oppose release. 

□ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

□ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to 

any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or 

(c).

□ The Government opposes release.

□ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

□ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there 

is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly 

shown under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

 Signed September 26, 2023. ____________________________________ 

 REBECCA RUTHERFORD

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date 

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United 

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).

Case 3:22-cr-00204-S Document 27 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50598 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BARRY YETT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CR-33-2-JRN

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Barry Yett, federal prisoner # 61167-080, appeals the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence based on Amendment 599 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Yett pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).No. 04-50598 -2- Yett argues that a sentence enhancement for possession of a weapon constituted impermissible double counting in violation of Amendment 599. He asserts that Amendment 599 must be applied to U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1, 2K2.4, and 2K2.5. Amendment 599, which amended the commentary to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4, applies to convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 844(h) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c) and 929(a). Yett pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and his guideline sentencing range was computed under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, based upon his drug conviction. Amendment 599 is irrelevant to his sentence, and his claims are without merit. Yett also raises the Supreme Court's recent decision in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), in support of his appeal. Yett's argument is not cognizable in the context of a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Shaw , 30 F.3d 26, 29 (5th Cir. 1994). Yett's motion to file a supplemental brief is DENIED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN M. BROWN, §

#87517, §

 §

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-2102-M

§

HUNT COUNTY SHERIFF, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a 

Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding 

none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-02102-M-BN Document 5 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 12