alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2525** 

In re: CHARLES PYNE , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition

. (No. 8:04

- cr - 00018

- AW

- 3 )

Submitted : January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD , and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles Pyne , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles Pyne petitions for a writ of prohibition, seeking an order directing the district court to recuse itself from any further participation regarding his pending Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion. We conclude that Pyne is not entitled to relief.

A wri t of prohibition is a drastic remedy that should be granted only where the petitioner’s right to the requested relief is clear and indisputable. In re Vargas , 723 F.2d 1461 , 1468 (10th Cir. 1983) . Further, a writ of prohibition should be granted only where the petitioner has no other adequate means of relief, In re Banker’s Trust Co. , 775 F.2d 545, 547 (3d Cir. 1985), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Missouri , 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981). The relief sought by Pyne is not available by way of a writ of prohibition. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of prohibition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 1 of 8 PageID 15
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 2 of 8 PageID 16
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 3 of 8 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 4 of 8 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 5 of 8 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 6 of 8 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 7 of 8 PageID 21
Case 4:22-cr-00165-P Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 8 of 8 PageID 22
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30380 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 89-CR-220-N

- - - - - - - - - - March 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Manuel Flores, federal prisoner #02184-095, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He argues that he is entitled to a reduction in his sentence based upon two retroactive amendments, 371 and 484, to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially theNo. -2- reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Flores , No. 89-220 (E.D. La. March 21, 1997).
W: \WDOX\CLIENTS\ 1532 \0676\00583341.DOCX Page 1 of 3 CAUSE NO. 03- 15 -00219- CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

HALLMARK SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS, INC. and HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants

v. TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

From the 98th Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas

APPELLANTS HALLMARK SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS, INC. and HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ’s MOTION FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT

NOW COME Appellants Hallmark Specialty Underwriters, Inc. and

Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company (“Appellants”) and file this, their Motion

for Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Civil

Procedure and, in support thereof, would show as follows:

I.

The parties herein have resolved their differences regarding the present

matter. Appellants therefore voluntarily dismiss the present appeal pursuant to ACCEPTED 03-15-00219-CV 6207530 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2015 9:31:41 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKW: \ WDOX \ CLIENTS \ 1532 \ 0676 \ 00583 341.DOCX Page 2 of 3

Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and the parties agree that all

appell ate costs are to be paid by the party incurring same.

II

.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants pray that this court

dismiss the present appeal in light of the parties’ resolution of this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

CURNEY, FARMER, HOUSE, & OSUNA, P.C. 411 Heimer Road San Antonio, Texas 78232

- 4854 (210) 377

- 1990 (telephone) (210) 377

- 1065 (facsimile)

By: /s/ Wm. David Farmer Wm. David Farmer State Bar No. 06826470 Email: wdfarmer@cfholaw.com Chad W. Schreiber State Bar No. 24085732 Email: cschreiber@cfholaw.com

Attorneys for Appellants Hallmark Mutual Insurance Company and Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Opposing counsel has agreed to an d is unopposed to Appellant ’ s request under
this Motion.

Date: July 2 4 , 2015

By: /s/ Wm. David Farmer Wm. David FarmerW: \ WDOX \ CLIENTS \ 1532 \ 0676 \ 00583 341.DOCX Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served on the following by Electronic Filing Service Provider (EFSP), email, hand delivery, facsimile, and/or certified mail, return recei pt requested, on the 2 4th day of July

, 2015:

Via E

- mail: splacek@arnoldplacek.co m

sarnold@arnoldplacek.com jchaltain@arnoldplacek.com R. Scott Placek Scott Arnold Jonathan Chaltain Arnold & Placek, PC 203 East Main Street, Sui te 201 Round Rock, Texas 78664 Telephone: (512) 341

- 7044 Facsimile: (512) 341

- 7921

Trial Attorneys for Appellee Texas Mutual Insurance Company

/s/ Wm. David Farmer
# 2022 TRIP
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  August 14, 2008       /s/  Laurence P. Birch
                              -----------------------
                              Laurence P. Birch
                              President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
                              Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial
                              Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 242 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 242

 Designating the week beginning October 17, 1993, as ``National Radon 
                             Action Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1993

Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Hastert) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the week beginning October 17, 1993, as ``National Radon 
                             Action Week''.

Whereas exposure to radon poses a serious threat to the health of the people of 
        the United States;
Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that lung cancer 
        attributable to radon exposure causes approximately 14,000 deaths per 
        year in the United States;
Whereas excessively high levels of radon in homes and schools can be reduced 
        successfully and economically with appropriate mitigation measures;
Whereas only a small percentage of the homes in the Nation have been tested for 
        radon levels;
Whereas the people of the United States should be educated about the dangers of 
        exposure to radon;
Whereas the people of the United States should be encouraged to conduct tests 
        for radon in their homes and schools and to make the repairs required to 
        reduce excessive radon levels; and
Whereas increased public awareness of the dangers of radon gas will lead to more 
        informed decisionmaking and a more productive use of resources: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning 
October 17, 1993, is designated as ``National Radon Action Week'', and 
the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling on the people of the United States to observe the week with 
appropriate activities designed to increase public awareness of the 
dangers of radon gas and of available mitigation measures.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









CERTIFICATION


I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:
 1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2015-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement, in all material respects; and
  5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association.
  Date:                      June 15, 2016


By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00566-CR

Joshua Mathew TALBOTT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CR4058

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE 

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED November 30, 2022.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THECHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
Janice B. Trouba, Chief Financial Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)       
          The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007,
          which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
          The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp, Inc.

|Date:  August 9, 2007 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By: /s/ Janice B. Trouba      
       Janice B. TroubaIts:  Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request
4

Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 2 of 9 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 3 of 9 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 4 of 9 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 5 of 9 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 6 of 9 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 7 of 9 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 8 of 9 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00914-P Document 1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 9 of 9 PageID 9
# JFSC Hosts Senior Leader Offsite and Board of Visitors

/ Published May 25, 2023
NSA HAMPTON ROADS, VA, 
This week the Joint Forces Staff College, located on Naval Support Activity Hampton Roads in Norfolk Virginia, was proud to host the National Defense University (NDU) Senior Leader offsite. The offsite is an annual gathering of senior leaders from across the university’s five components, designed to assess and address university-wide topics. Topics this year included budget updates, staffing, and facilities.

During these sessions several common themes emerged, capturing a sense of NDU’s potential direction and warranting more detailed planning and consideration for their effect on FY23-29 resource allocation decisions.

Additionally, the National Defense University Board of Visitors met Wednesday, 24th 2023, at the Joint Forces Staff College for its semi-annual full-board meeting. The Board of Visitors is a SECDEF-appointed panel charged with providing independent advice and recommendations on accreditation compliance, organizational management, strategic planning, resource management, and other matters of interest to the National Defense University. The meeting this quarter marks the first time board members gathered at the Norfolk campus. The meetings included a State of the University address from NDU President Lt Gen Michael Plehn, USAF.

The board covered a wide range of topics to include access to mental health, student demographics, ethics, and other board business. These public sessions were open to the attendance via livestream and in person. Board members also participated in a tour of the Joint Forces Staff College and Ike Skelton Library.

The board shall be composed of not more than 12 members who are eminent authorities in the fields of defense, management, leadership, academia, national military strategy or joint planning at all levels of war, joint doctrine, joint command and control, or joint requirements and development.

**Current Board Members**
      - General Norton Schwartz USAF (Ret)—Board Chair
      - Ambassador Bismarck Myrick (Ret)—Vice Chair
      - Vice Admiral Jody Breckenridge USCG (Ret)
      - Lieutenant General Charles Hooper USA (Ret)
      - Dr. Chris Howard
      - Dr. Suzanne Logan
      - Colonel Nora Ramirez Marcos USA (Ret)
      - Dr. DJ Patil
      - The Honorable Tim Roemer
      - The Honorable Debra Wada

NDU continues to be the premier institution for advanced Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) and is instrumental in educating our most elite military officers and their civilian counterparts.

We at the Joint Forces Staff College appreciate each of the Board members and Senior Leaders for taking the time to visit our campus to share their experiences and knowledge over the past two days.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SAN ANGELO DIVISION 

ROBERT SCHELSKE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. No. 6:22-CV-049-H

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official 

capacity as United States Secretary of 

Defense, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for an Extension of Time to Submit 

Joint Supplemental Notice. Dkt. No. 119. For the reasons stated in the motion, the motion 

is granted. The parties shall have until July 14, 2023, to file the joint supplemental notice 

previously requested by the Court. See Dkt. No. 115.

So ordered on July 5, 2023.

JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:22-cv-00049-H Document 120 Filed 07/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2554
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WILLIE LAMPLEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

C. RIVERS, )

)

Respondent. ) Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1857-C-BN

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this civil action should be dismissed for

lack of jurisdiciton. Petitioner has failed to file objections to the United States Magistrate Judge’s

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired—including six extra

days allowed for normal mail time delays.1

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error

and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated

therein, the Court ORDERS that this civil action be DISMISSED without prejudice. 

Pursuant to Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c),

this Court finds that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Specifically, Petitioner has failed

to show that a reasonable jurist would find: (1) this Court’s “assessment of the constitutional

1

Petitioner filed an Amended Petition, but failed to object to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation. Petitioner’s filing does not change the well-reasoned

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 

Case 3:22-cv-01857-C-BN Document 7 Filed 09/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 62
claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) “it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the

denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural

ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated September 20, 2022. 

SAM R. CUMMINGS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01857-C-BN Document 7 Filed 09/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 63
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SYED HOSAIN ALI, §

 §

Petitioner, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-785-L-BN

 §

MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney §

General of the United States, et al., §

 §

Respondents. §

ORDER 

On April 7, 2022, the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Doc. 5) was entered, recommending that the court transfer 

Petitioner’s section 2241 habeas application to the Ablilene Division of this district where 

Petitioner is physically confined. No objections to the Report were received as of the date of this 

order.

Having considered Petitioner’s habeas application, the record, filed, and Report, the court 

determines that the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions are correct, and accepts them as 

those of the court. The court, therefore, transfers Petitioner’s section 2241 habeas application to 

the Ablilene Division of the Northern District of Texas where Petitioner is physically confined, 

and the clerk of the court is directed to effect the transfer in accordance with normal procedure.

It is so ordered this 29th day of April, 2022.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00785-L-BN Document 7 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 21