alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 4678-019, 4679-022]


Power Authority of the State of New York; Notice of Availability 
of Final Environmental Assessment

November 17, 2000.
    A final environmental assessment (FEA) is available for public 
review. The FEA was prepared for New York Power Authority's (licensee) 
application to operate the Crescent and Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric 
Projects in a run-of-river mode.
    In summary, the FEA examines the environmental impacts of three 
alternatives for operating the Crescent and Vischer Ferry Projects: (1) 
licensee's proposed action: run-of-river operation; (2) licensee's 
initial proposed action: limited ponding; and (3) no-action. These 
alternatives are described in detail in the FEA.
    The FEA recommends that the licensee operate the projects in a run-
of-river mode in accordance with the licensee's proposed action 
alternative. The FEA concludes that implementation of this alternative 
would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment.
    This FEA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects 
(OEP). Copies of the FEA can be obtained by contacting the Commission's 
Public Reference Room at (202) 208-1371.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29996 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 43444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17567]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Additions and Deletion

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Additions to and Deletion from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add services to the Procurement 
List that will be provided by nonprofit agencies employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities, and deletes a service 
previously provided by such agency.
    Comments Must Be Received On Or Before: 8/25/2014.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 USC 
8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested 
persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following services are proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Services

Service Type/Location: Assembly, Kitting, Warehousing and 
Fulfillment Service National Park Service, Interpretation and 
Education Division 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC
NPA: Industries for the Blind, Inc., West Allis, WI
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Interior, National Park Service, 
NCR Regional Contracting, Washington, DC

Service Type/Location: Custodial Service, FAA, Merrill Field Air 
Traffic Control Tower, 1950 East Fifth Avenue, Anchorage, AK
NPA: M. C. Resource Management, Anchorage, AK
Contracting Activity: Dept of Transportation, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Renton, WA

Deletion

    The following service is proposed for deletion from the Procurement 
List:

Service:

Service Type/Location: Janitorial/Custodial, U.S. Army Reserve 
Center, 1001 W. DeYoung Street, Marion, IL
NPA: The H Group, B.B.T. Inc., West Frankfurt, IL
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Army, W6QM MICC-ARCC NORTH, Fort 
McCoy, WI

Patricia Briscoe,
Deputy Director, Business Operations, Pricing and Information 
Management.
[FR Doc. 2014-17567 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of vTv Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rudy C. Howard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of the Company that, to my knowledge: 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: January 16, 2018

 

|        |                         |
|--------|-------------------------|
| By:    | /s/ Rudy C. Howard      |
|   | Rudy C. Howard          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 227 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 227

  Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to protecting the 
                  privacy rights of Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 1994

  Mr. Dornan submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to protecting the 
                  privacy rights of Federal employees.

Whereas executive branch departments and agencies have been known to officially 
        recognize, encourage, promote, and fund homosexual events and 
        homosexuality, both male and female, without explicit congressional 
        mandate; and
Whereas that type of official recognition, encouragement, promotion, and 
        funding, at taxpayer expense, is questionable, given that--
            (1) homosexuality is not a fundamental constitutional right;
            (2) there is no clear evidence that persons are deprived of 
        educational or economic opportunities by reason of their homosexuality; 
        and
            (3) equating homosexuality with race, color, or gender is highly 
        offensive, particularly to many minority group members and women who 
        have had to struggle to secure social opportunity and certain basic 
        rights: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) executive branch departments and agencies should not 
        officially recognize, encourage, promote, or fund homosexual 
        events or homosexuality, directly or indirectly, male or 
        female, without explicit congressional mandate;
            (2) the Office of Personnel Management should administer 
        the civil service system in a way such that quotas, minority 
        status, affirmative action, and other similar concepts do not 
        apply with respect to homosexuality or any claim thereof; and
            (3) no person should be required to comply with, 
        participate in, or endorse any employee sensitivity training or 
        education relating to homosexuality or cultural diversity, or 
        other similar program, as a condition for appointment, job 
        retention, or advancement in the Federal civil service.

                                 <all>
```
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1036

AN ACT

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Secunot preempt certain State laws. rity Act of 1974 to provide that such Act does
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1036

AN ACT

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

of 1974 to provide that such Act does not preempt

certain State laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ERISA PREEMPTION RULES NOT TO APPLY TO

4 CERTAIN ADDITIONAL STATE LAWS.

5 Section 514(b) of the Employee Retirement Income

6 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1144(b)) is amended by

7 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(9) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—
2

HR 1036 EH

1 ‘‘(A) any provision of State law to the extent

2 that such provision requires the payment of prevail3 ing wages, including employee benefits, on public

4 projects and permits any prevailing employee benefit

5 plan contribution or cost requirement of such law to

6 be met by crediting—

7 ‘‘(i) the payment of employee benefit plan

8 contributions or costs,

9 ‘‘(ii) the payment of wages in lieu of such

10 contributions or costs, or

11 ‘‘(iii) the payment of a combination of

12 wages and such contributions or costs;

13 except that this subparagraph shall not be construed

14 to exempt from subsection (a) any such provision to

15 the extent it otherwise mandates the maintenance of,

16 or otherwise regulates the benefits or operations of,

17 any employee benefit plan;

18 ‘‘(B) any provision of State law to the extent

19 that such provision—

20 ‘‘(i) establishes minimum standards for the

21 certification or registration of apprenticeship or

22 other training programs,

23 ‘‘(ii) concerns the establishment, mainte24 nance, or operation of a certified or registered

25 apprenticeship or other training program, or
3

HR 1036 EH

1 ‘‘(iii) makes certified or registered appren2 ticeship or other training an occupational quali3 fication,

4 and does not conflict with any right, requirement, or

5 duty established under this title; or

6 ‘‘(C) any provision of State law to the extent

7 that such provision provides for a mechanics’ lien or

8 other lien, bonding, or other security for the collec9 tion of delinquent contributions to a multiemployer

10 plan.’’.

11 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect

13 on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply

14 to matters with respect to which actions are pending on

15 or after such date.

Passed the House of Representatives November 9,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Guillory, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard T. Andrias, J.), rendered November 22, 1988, convicting defendant of two counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to concurrent indeterminate terms of from 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Complainant, who was in town on business, went to a movie theatre, and was confronted by defendant and codefendant as he was about to leave the lower lobby men’s room. He was placed in a chokehold as his wallet was taken from his pocket. Complainant was able to hold codefendant as defendant fled. *358However, defendant was forced back into the bathroom by an approaching officer, who had been alerted to the crime by another patron who quickly left the bathroom when the altercation began. Complainant recovered his wallet and noticed that his money was missing.

The trial court properly concluded that defendant had failed to establish a prima facie showing that the prosecution, in violation of *Batson v Kentucky*(476 *US 79),*was using peremptory challenges to strike members of defendant’s race from the jury. The prosecution’s use of three out of nine peremptory challenges to exclude blacks was facially insufficient *(People v Bolling,*166 AD2d 203). Nor may defendant enlarge the cognizable group of those allegedly excluded to include Hispanics where the record is silent as to the race or national origin of the excluded jurors.

The trial court properly declined to impose a sanction for the alleged failure to retain possession of the wallet as evidence, since the record does not support of the view that the officers had ever taken possession of the evidence which was, in any event, produced at trial *(cf., People v Kelly,*62 NY2d 516).

A missing witness charge as to police officers who arrived on the scene was not warranted, since it was not shown that they could have been expected to give material, noncumulative testimony *(People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424). As to the statement of a juror who expressed sympathy for the complainant, it was not demonstrated that the juror either predetermined defendant’s guilt, or that there existed any other impropriety *(see generally, People v Brown,*48 NY2d 388). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Rosenberger, Asch and Wallach, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-95-000]


Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

November 16, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 13, 2000, Maritimes & Northeast 
Pipeline, L.L.C. (Maritimes) tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to 
become effective on November 3, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 9

    Maritimes states that it is filing the above tariff sheet to 
implement two negotiated rate agreements pursuant to Rate Schedule 
MN365 and Section 24 of the General Terms and Conditions of Maritimes' 
FERC Gas Tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29864 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 4:22-cr-00252-P Document 63 Filed 11/22/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 105
Case 4:22-cr-00252-P Document 63 Filed 11/22/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 106
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 200

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States limiting

the number of consecutive terms members of the United States Senate

and House of Representatives may serve.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1993

Mr. DORNAN of California introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States limiting the number of consecutive terms members

of the United States Senate and House of Representatives may serve.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
2

•HJ 200 IH

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission

3 for ratification:

4 ‘‘ARTICLE—

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person may serve any term or por6 tion thereof as a member of the United States House of

7 Representatives if such person has served as a member

8 of the House for each of the five terms, or a portion of

9 any such term, immediately preceding such term.

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person may serve any term or por11 tion thereof as a member of the United States Senate if

12 such person has served as a member of the Senate for

13 each of the two terms, or a portion of any such term, im14 mediately preceding such term.

15 ‘‘SECTION 3. For purposes of this article, service as

16 a member in the United States Senate or House of Rep17 resentatives in any term which commenced before the rati18 fication of this article may not be included in determining

19 the number of terms served.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                        COMPUTER LEARNING CENTERS, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
            (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       FOR THE THREE MONTH                         FOR THE NINE MONTH
                                                     PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31,                   PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31,
                                              ---------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
                                                  1998                       1997           1998                         1997
                                              ------------               ------------  ------------                  -----------
<S>                                           <C>                        <C>            <C>                         <C>

Net income..................................  $       473                $     2,595    $     4,478                  $     6,916
                                              -----------                -----------    -----------                  -----------
Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding -- Basic......................   17,331,159                 15,998,430     17,268,569                   15,818,870
Dilutive securities:
     Options................................      322,615                  1,041,650        832,312                    1,174,800
Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding -- Diluted....................   17,653,774                 17,040,080     18,100,881                   16,993,670
Earnings per share:
     Basic..................................  $      0.03                $      0.16    $      0.26                  $      0.44
                                              ===========                ===========    ===========                  ===========
     Diluted................................  $      0.03                $      0.15    $      0.25                  $      0.41
                                              ===========                ===========    ===========                  ===========
</TABLE>

      Share and per share amounts restated to reflect the January 1998 two for
one stock split and the April 1997 three for two stock split.
# C_2004094EN.01000901.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

19 February 2004

In Case C-310/03: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Failure to implement Directive 1999/44/EC)

(2004/C 94/16)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-310/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: D. Martin), against Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner): Application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees (OJ 1999 L 171, p. 12), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive, the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 19 February 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.09.2003.

1

---