alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 75 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 75

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 9 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

            November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``National Good Teen Day''.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed January 16, 1992, as 
        ``Good Teen Day'';
Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in the United States 
        according to the 1990 Census;
Whereas our Nation's teenagers represent an important part of our society, and 
        the many physical and emotional changes and character-building 
        experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;
Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who have problems or 
        those who excel;
Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their intelligence, 
        abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the good which is inherent 
        in all human beings;
Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to esteem the good as 
        well as the potential that is within each of them;
Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive qualities in America's 
        youth; and
Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That January 16, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Good Teen Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers 
of the United States and by participating in appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Official Journal L 268/16 A

| | ISSN 0378-6978 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 268 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4716 August 2004 |

ISSN 0378-6978

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 268

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4716 August 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1435/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2004 amending, as a result of enlargement, Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 on the organisation of Community surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings | 1 |
| | * | Decision No 593/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 July 2004 amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005) | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Regulation (EC) No 1435/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2004 amending, as a result of enlargement, Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 on the organisation of Community surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings

1

*

Decision No 593/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 July 2004 amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005)

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

The Charitable DAF Fund, L.P. 

Plaintiff 

V. 3 :22-cv-02280-S 

Civil Action No. 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

Defendant 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

(This form also satisfies Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1) 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and LR 3.l(c), LR 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.l(a)(4)(D), and LR 81.2, 

The Charitable DAF Fund, L.P. 

provides the following infonnation: 

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state "None"):

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

None 

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations,

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are 

financially interested in the outcome of the case: 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

The Dallas Foundation, Greater Kansas City Community Foundation, Santa Barbara 

Foundation, The Community Foundation of North Texas (CFNT), Highland Dallas Foundation, 

Inc., Highland Kansas City Foundation, Inc., Highland Santa Barbara Foundation, Inc., HCMLP 

Charitable Fund, Charitable DAF Holdco, Ltd., Charitable DAF Fund, L.P., CLO Holdco, Ltd. 

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 2 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 43
Date:

Signature:

Print Name:

Bar Number:

Address:

City,State,Zip:

Telephone:

Fax:

E-Mail:

l9

24058096

2200 Ross A Suite 4900W

Dallas. TX7520l

214-432-2899

2t4-853-4367

mas@.sbaitilaw.com

NOTE: To electronically file this document, you will find the svent in our Case Management (CM/ECF) system, under Civil :> Other

Documents :> Certifi cate of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement.

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 2 Filed 10/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 44
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00405-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.V.M.M., a Child

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA01147

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE RIOS, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal 

because appellant qualifies as indigent under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.

SIGNED December 7, 2022.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
TIGTA 4.1 Table 2020 Page 1 of 1 4/10/2019

TIGTA FY 2020 President's 

Budget Request: Summary of 

Capital Investments

$000,000s

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Percent Agency External Agency External Total

Capital Investments Total 2.964 - 8.891 - 11.855 3.128 - 9.385 - 12.513 3.156 - 9.467 - 12.623 1% 3.270 - 9.809 - 13.079 

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 0.707 - 2.120 - 2.827 0.806 - 2.419 - 3.225 0.815 - 2.446 - 3.261 1% 0.815 - 2.446 - 3.261 

Standard/Non-Standard IT sub-total 2.257 - 6.771 - 9.028 2.322 - 6.967 - 9.289 2.340 - 7.020 - 9.360 1% 2.454 - 7.362 - 9.816 

IT Total 2.964 - 8.891 - 11.855 3.128 - 9.385 - 12.513 3.156 - 9.467 - 12.623 1% 3.270 - 9.809 - 13.079 

non-IT Total

TIGTA Major IT Investments

TIGTA non-Major IT Investments

TIGTA IT Applications and Collaboration (IT A&C) 0.707 - 2.120 - 2.827 0.806 - 2.419 - 3.225 0.815 - 2.446 - 3.261 1% 0.815 - 2.446 - 3.261 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.707 - 2.120 - 2.827 0.806 - 2.419 - 3.225 0.815 - 2.446 - 3.261 1% 0.815 - 2.446 - 3.261 

TIGTA Standard/Non-Standard IT Investments

TIGTA IT Cybersecurity 0.407 - 1.220 - 1.627 0.411 - 1.232 - 1.643 0.414 - 1.242 - 1.656 1% 0.414 - 1.242 - 1.656 

015-05-0101 Salaries and Expenses 0.407 - 1.220 - 1.627 0.411 - 1.232 - 1.643 0.414 - 1.242 - 1.656 1% 0.414 - 1.242 - 1.656 

TIGTA IT Enterprise Architecture & Management (IT 

EA&M)

0.276 - 0.829 - 1.105 0.324 - 0.971 - 1.295 0.326 - 0.978 - 1.304 1% 0.326 - 0.978 - 1.304 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.276 - 0.829 - 1.105 0.324 - 0.971 - 1.295 0.326 - 0.978 - 1.304 1% 0.326 - 0.978 - 1.304 

TIGTA IT Infrastructure End User Systems and 

Support (ITI EUSS)

0.589 - 1.768 - 2.357 0.628 - 1.883 - 2.511 0.632 - 1.895 - 2.527 1% 0.746 - 2.238 - 2.984 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.589 - 1.768 - 2.357 0.628 - 1.883 - 2.511 0.632 - 1.895 - 2.527 1% 0.746 - 2.238 - 2.984 

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Mainframe and Servers 

Services and Support (ITI MSSS)

0.714 - 2.141 - 2.855 0.584 - 1.753 - 2.337 0.590 - 1.769 - 2.359 1% 0.590 - 1.769 - 2.359 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.714 - 2.141 - 2.855 0.584 - 1.753 - 2.337 0.590 - 1.769 - 2.359 1% 0.590 - 1.769 - 2.359 

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Telecommunications (ITT 

TSS)

0.271 - 0.813 - 1.084 0.376 - 1.127 - 1.503 0.378 - 1.135 - 1.513 1% 0.378 - 1.135 - 1.513 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.271 - 0.813 - 1.084 0.376 - 1.127 - 1.503 0.378 - 1.135 - 1.513 1% 0.378 - 1.135 - 1.513 

TIGTA non-IT Investments

DME O&M Total

FY 2018 Actual Obligations FY 2019 Estimated Obligations FY 2020 Estimated Obligations FY 2020 Budget Authority Request 

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

Change 

from CY 

to BY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

NADIA DORISE-CLAY, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00659-O-BP

 § 

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT §

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED on this 3rd day of November, 2022. 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00659-O Document 8 Filed 11/03/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 417

Providing for temporary extension of the application of the final paragraph

of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act with respect to the dispute

between the Soo Line Railroad Company and certain of its employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1994

Mr. DINGELL (for himself, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. SWIFT, and Mr. OXLEY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for temporary extension of the application of the

final paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act

with respect to the dispute between the Soo Line Railroad Company and certain of its employees.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PROHIBITION.

4 The final paragraph of section 10 of the Railway

5 Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 160) shall apply and be extended

6 through February 28, 1995, with respect to the dispute
2

•HJ 417 IH

1 referred to in Executive Order No. 12925 of August 29,

2 1994. During this extension period no change, except by

3 agreement, shall be made by the rail carrier, the Soo Line

4 Railroad Company, or by the employees of such carrier

5 represented by the United Transportation Union, in the

6 conditions out of which the dispute arose as such condi7 tions existed before July 14, 1994.

Æ
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 11 PageID 147
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 11 PageID 148
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 3 of 11 PageID 149
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 4 of 11 PageID 150
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 5 of 11 PageID 151
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 6 of 11 PageID 152
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 7 of 11 PageID 153
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 8 of 11 PageID 154
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 9 of 11 PageID 155
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 10 of 11 PageID 156
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 17 Filed 10/05/22 Page 11 of 11 PageID 157
# Official Journal L 203/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 203 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 621 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 203

English edition

Legislation

Volume 621 August 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1288 of 25 July 2019 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed ‘Rögös túró’ (TSG) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1289 of 31 July 2019 concerning the authorisation of L-valine produced by Corynebacterium glutamicum KCCM 11201P as a feed additive for all animal species (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1290 of 31 July 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/338 as regards the minimum content of a preparation of 6-phytase, produced by Aspergillus niger (DSM 25770) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening or reared for laying (holder of authorisation BASF SE) (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1291 of 30 July 2019 on the compliance of the 2019 unit rate for the charging zone of Switzerland with Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013
  (notified under document C(2019) 5532)

   (
  1
  ) | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1288 of 25 July 2019 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed ‘Rögös túró’ (TSG)

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1289 of 31 July 2019 concerning the authorisation of L-valine produced by Corynebacterium glutamicum KCCM 11201P as a feed additive for all animal species (
  1
  )

Corynebacterium glutamicum

1

2

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1290 of 31 July 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/338 as regards the minimum content of a preparation of 6-phytase, produced by Aspergillus niger (DSM 25770) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening or reared for laying (holder of authorisation BASF SE) (
  1
  )

Aspergillus niger

1

6

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1291 of 30 July 2019 on the compliance of the 2019 unit rate for the charging zone of Switzerland with Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013
  (notified under document C(2019) 5532)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 5532)

1

8

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

FREDERICK N BASTON,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-CV-00853-P

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, 

and a Recommendation in this case. ECF No. 9. No objections were filed, 

and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The 

District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District 

Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. 

The Court therefore ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED 

without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s 

orders (ECF Nos. 7, 8). 

SO ORDERED on this 22nd day of December 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00853-P Document 10 Filed 12/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
#### CASRAY OIL CORPORATION v. ROYAL INDEMNITY CO. et al.

No. 8046.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 7, 1943.

Scars, Blades, Moore & Kennedy and Fred W. Moore, all of Houston, for plaintiff in error.

Wood, Gresham, McCorquodale & Martin and Newton Gresham, all of Houston, for defendant in error Indemnity Co.

Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Francis, Thomas Fletcher, and Fred R. Switzer, all of Houston, for defendant in error Switzer.

ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.

This is a garnishment case. Royal Indemnity Company, the garnishee, prevailed in the trial court, and that court allowed it an attorney’s fee of $250 for the services of an attorney in the trial court, and further provided that in the event an appeal was taken from the judgment, the garnishee should recover the sum of $50 for the services of the attorney in the Court of Civil Appeals and $50 for the services of such attorney in the Supreme Court. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 165 S.W.2d 244.

The Casray Oil Corporation, plaintiff in the lower court, assigned as error the action of the trial court in allowing the recovery of $100 for attorney’s fees in the event of an appeal. It was upon this assignment that we granted the writ of error. However, since the granting of the writ the garnishee has remitted the $100 in controversy. Consequently, the question raised by the assignment has become moot.

The Court of Civil Appeals correctly decided all other points.

The judgments of the trial court and Court of Civil Appeals, as reformed by the remittitur, will be affirmed. The costs in the Court of Civil Appeals and Supreme Court will be assessed against the respondent Royal Indemnity Company.
Case 3:22-cr-00304-S   Document 31   Filed 05/08/23    Page 1 of 2   PageID 195

Case 3:22-cr-00304-S   Document 31   Filed 05/08/23    Page 2 of 2   PageID 196
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 272 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 272

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Designating December 15, 1993, as ``National Firefighters Day''.



                                     


103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 272

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
    Designating December 15, 1993, as ``National Firefighters Day''.

Whereas there are over 2,000,000 firefighters in the United States;
Whereas firefighters respond to more than 2,300,000 fires and 8,700,000 
        emergencies other than fires each year;
Whereas fires annually cause nearly 6,000 deaths and $10,000,000,000 in property 
        damages;
Whereas firefighters have given their lives and risked injury to preserve the 
        lives and protect the property of others;
Whereas the contributions and sacrifices of valiant firefighters often go 
        unreported and are inadequately recognized by the public; and
Whereas the work of firefighters deserves the attention and gratitude of all 
        individuals in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That December 15, 1993, is 
designated as ``National Firefighters Day'', and the President of the 
United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States to observe the day with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 21, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Case 3:22-cv-01631-S-BK Document 12 Filed 08/26/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 31
### MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

FAA - 2012 - 0101 Docket Number

2010 - SW - 042 -AD Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained

in the Supplemental AD Docket ASB No . ASB - M BB - BK117 - 60 - 121, Revision 4, dated December 11, 2007 ASB No. MBB B K117 C - 2 - 71A- 003, Revision 3, dated December 11, 2007

**MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
#### VAN HORN v. STATE.

No. 21814.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1941.

• Otto Mullinax, of Winnsboro, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted upon his plea of guilty before the district court of Wood County on a charge of cattle theft, and given two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts, and the only bill of exception complains of the failure of the court to sustain appellant’s motion to quash the indictment, which was on the ground that the indict*988ment failed to allege that the intention to take the cattle involved was concurrent with the taking. We do not think the language of the indictment is subject to such criticism. No brief has been filed in the case and the bill of exception does not point out the object of the motion so as to convey to us just what appellant had in mind.

The procedure appears to be regular.

Finding np error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.