alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Thursday, September 12, 2019 Meeting September 12, 2019
Office of Justice Programs
Third Floor Main Conference Room (MCR)
810 7th Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
Date: Thursday, September 12, 2019
Time: 10:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Webcast of Council MeetingMeeting Summary
  
Date Published: September 12, 2019
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TONYA R. MOSLEY,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN 

DEVELOPMENT,

Respondent

______________________

2023-2167

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF-0752-23-0252-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Tonya R. Mosley’s failure to file 

her Statement Concerning Discrimination and Federal 

Circuit Rule 15(c)(3) which states “[f]ailure to file a completed discrimination statement may result in dismissal,”

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This petition for review is dismissed.

Case: 23-2167 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 11/15/2023
2 MOSLEY v. HUD

(2) Any pending motion is denied as moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

November 15, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 

Case: 23-2167 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 11/15/2023
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 96-4122

____________

Gary A. Randolph, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Communications Workers of *

America, District 6; Earline Jones, * Appeal from the United States

President, Local 6377; W. L. * District Court for the

Eidson, General Vice President; * Eastern District of Missouri.

Dan Backstead, President, District 6; *

Victor Crawley, Vice President, * [UNPUBLISHED]

District 6; Phil Ferril, CWA Rep., *

District 6; Morton Bahr, President of *

CWA, *

*

Appellees. *

____________

 Submitted: June 23, 1997

 Filed: June 30, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri.

We decline to review the dismissal of Randolph’s Title VII claims against the 2

individual defendants as he fails to raise the issue in his appellate brief. See Jasperson

v. Purolator Courier Corp., 765 F.2d 736, 740-41 (8th Cir. 1985).

-2-

After Gary A. Randolph’s discrimination action against his former employer was

dismissed as untimely, he brought the present Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17

(1994), action against his union, Communication Workers of America (Union), and six

Union officers. He alleged that he was subjected to misrepresentation and disparate

treatment when the Union “colluded” with his former employer to sabotage his labor

grievance, and “stalled” Randolph for so long that he was not able to file a timely

action against his former employer. Randolph twice moved for counsel. The District

Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss Randolph’s action for failure to state 1

a claim, and denied Randolph’s motions for appointment of counsel. Randolph

appeals, and we affirm.

After de novo review, see First Commercial Trust Co., N.A. v. Colt’s Mfg. Co.,

77 F.3d 1081, 1083 (8th Cir. 1996), we conclude that the District Court was correct in

dismissing Randolph’s claims against the Union : he failed to allege that the Union

2

mishandled his labor grievance for an illegal, discriminatory reason, see Martin v. Local

1513 and Dist. 118 of Int'l Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 859 F.2d 581,

584 (8th Cir. 1988), and he failed to allege facts otherwise constituting an employment

practice prohibited under Title VII, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(c) (1994).

We also conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Randolph counsel. See Edgington v. Missouri Dep’t of Corrections, 52 F.3d 777, 780

(8th Cir. 1995). 

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellate case name: Vozarron, Inc. v. Harris County Appraisal District

Appellate case number: 01-16-00224-CV

Trial court case number: 2009-57592

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

On May 23, 2016, appellant, Vozarron, Inc., filed an affidavit of indigence in this 

Court for the appellate filing and clerk’s record fee purposes and stated, among other 

things, that the reporter’s record is unnecessary. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c)(1). The 

Clerk of this Court requested that the trial clerk file an indigent clerk’s record. On July 6, 

2016, the indigent clerk’s record was filed in this Court attaching, among other 

documents, the trial court’s order, signed on June 21, 2016, sustaining the district clerk’s

contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e)(1), (i)(4).

A party claiming indigence for appellate costs may seek review of a trial court’s 

order sustaining a contest to its affidavit of indigence by filing a motion challenging the 

order, within 10 days of that order, in the appellate court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(j)(1), 

(2). Here, because appellant failed to timely file such a motion, the Clerk of this Court is 

directed to mark appellant not indigent for purposes of appellate costs. See id. 20.1(j)(2).

Accordingly, because appellant has not established indigence, it is ORDERED

that appellant pay the filing fee and pay, or arrange to pay, the clerk’s record fee to the 

trial clerk and file evidence with the Clerk of this Court of those payment arrangements

within 30 days of the date of this order, or this appeal may be dismissed without 

further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Higley

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 14, 2016
# National Family Week, 2000

Our families are perhaps the strongest influence in our lives. Anyone who grows up in a strong, nurturing family, grounded in the values of love and responsibility, will have a distinct advantage in achieving the most important tasks of adulthood—living fully, working productively, contributing to society, and forming one's own strong, stable family.

Our Nation, too, draws its strength and character from America's families, so as citizens we must do everything we can to support their well-being and self-sufficiency. Over the past 8 years, my Administration has strived to create an economic and social climate where families can flourish. We have strengthened the economy; enacted a higher minimum wage; expanded tax credits for working families; created greater access to higher education, quality health care, and affordable child care; and, with passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act, made it easier for working adults to take leave to care for an ailing family member without putting their jobs at risk. We have also been successful in moving thousands of children from temporary homes in foster care to permanent families where they can grow and flourish.

We are fortunate to be members of a larger family as well, composed not only of our immediate relatives, but also of our neighbors, colleagues, communities, and fellow citizens. As members of this extended family, we must learn to appreciate the value and diversity of other families' traditions; we must reach out to help those families who are still in need; and we must share responsibility for the care and development of all our Nation's children. In this season of Thanksgiving, let us be grateful for the knowledge that America is a Nation of families, standing together to make our country a better place in which to live and to make the future a brighter one for our children.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 19 through November 25, 2000, as National Family Week. I call upon Federal, State, and local officials to honor American families with appropriate programs and activities. I encourage educators, community organizations, and religious leaders to celebrate the strength and values we draw from family relationships, and I urge all the people of the United States to reaffirm their own family ties and to reach out to other families in friendship and goodwill.                          ( print page 70276)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 00-30022

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### Strickier *v.*Strickler, Appellant.

*35Argued September 29, 1939.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldeige, Stadtfeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*J. Ghanning*Ellery, with him *Frank O. Schlipp*and *Robert Mair,*for appellant.

*Joseph L. Fox,*for appellee.

December 14, 1939:

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

On April 4, 1938, the libellant wife filed a libel in divorce a mensa et thoro against the respondent husband, charging him with indignities to the person and maliciously turning her out of doors. Respondent filed an answer thereto denying the charges.

Libellant filed a petition for counsel fees and alimony to which respondent filed an answer.

Depositions were taken and the matter argued before' the court en banc and on October 27, 1938, the court made absolute the rule for alimony for $30 a week to commence as of September 19, 1938, said order having been made by Parry, J.

On November 14, 1938, a stipulation of counsel was *36signed and filed and presented to Judge Parry for his signature, wherein it was agreed that the order of $30 per week be reduced to $25 per week, and the accumulated arrearages be liquidated at $200 up until the week of November 7, 1938.

The court refused to allow the stipulation saying, “it was not within the power of counsel to stipulate that the court’s order be modified or changed in any way. That order must be obeyed. When it has been complied with, either of the parties may of course proceed by petition and rule for any change they may think proper. Stipulation disapproved and filed.”

The respondent then appealed from the order of October 27, 1938.

We are not required to review the record and determine whether the earning capacity of the respondent, as distinguished from his actual earnings or income, *(Com. v.*Sherrit, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 301, 304) — which was much less than $90 a week — (Sections 46 and 47 of the Act of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1237, as amended by the Act of May 25, 1933, P. L. 1020) justified an order of $30 a week, for in our opinion the parties were within their legal rights in stipulating — in the absence of any indication of fraud or overreaching on the part of either of them — that the amount of the order should thereafter be reduced to $25 per week and that the accumulated arrearages should be liquidated at $200, as of date of November 7, 1938.

The order was for the sole benefit of the wife and her stipulation in respect to its amount, concurred in by the husband, should have been accepted by the Court, in the absence of fraud or overreaching, of which no evidence was produced.

The order was not one which affected the dignity or prerogatives of the Court, but related to a matter which concerned only the parties themselves.

The order is modified to conform to the stipulation of November 14,1938, at the costs of the appellant.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 47

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States limiting

the number of consecutive terms for Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States limiting the number of consecutive terms for

Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 47 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. A person may not serve any portion of

5 a term as a Representative if the person has served as

6 a Representative for more than one year of each of the

7 six terms that immediately precede the term.

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. A person may not serve any portion of

9 a term as a Senator if the person has served as a Senator

10 for more than three years of each of the two terms that

11 immediately precede the term.

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall not prevent a person

13 who is serving any portion of a term as a Representative

14 or Senator on the date of the ratification of this article

15 from serving the remainder of the term.’’.

Æ
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 0144

_____________________________
T IMOTHY R. J ORDAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. William F. Stone , Judge

. August 2, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , C.J., and K ELSEY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Timothy R. Jordan, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Michigan

Kentucky

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $187,217,452.00

Permitted Expenses $19,975,385.00

TOTAL $207,192,837.00

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds$239,246,571.00

Permitted Expenses$44,747,765.00

TOTAL $283,994,336.00

Program Funds $637,670,660.00

Permitted Expenses $77,944,435.00

TOTAL $715,615,095.00

Indiana

Permitted Expenses $47,852,116.00

TOTAL $370,574,260.00

Illinois

Program Full Allocation

TOTAL $1,136,616,680.00

Georgia

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $322,722,144.00

Florida

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $1,043,943,276.69

Permitted Expenses $92,673,403.31

District of Columbia

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds$22,928,720.92

Permitted Expenses$5,845,546.08

TOTAL $28,774,267.00

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $2,118,434,611.41

Permitted Expenses $241,818,609.59

TOTAL $2,360,253,221.00

Program Funds $261,366,975.00

Permitted Expenses $34,779,745.00

TOTAL $296,146,720.00

California

Permitted Expenses $27,229,446.00

TOTAL $162,521,345.00

Arizona

Program Full Allocation

State Expense Allocations

Alabama

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $135,291,899.00
Tennessee

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds$271,112,421.44

Permitted Expenses$31,224,571.56

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $266,362,238.00

Permitted Expenses $51,310,525.00

TOTAL $317,672,763.00

Program Funds$100,607,831.55

Permitted Expenses$15,411,959.45

TOTAL $116,019,791.00

South Carolina

Permitted Expenses $57,680,781.64

TOTAL $314,752,280.00

Rhode Island

Program Full Allocation

TOTAL $762,791,540.00

Oregon

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $257,071,498.36

Ohio

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $701,821,385.73

Permitted Expenses $60,970,154.27

North Carolina

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $611,130,634.00

Permitted Expenses $95,808,248.00

TOTAL $706,938,882.00

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $370,482,064.00

Permitted Expenses $45,029,990.00

TOTAL $415,512,054.00

Program Funds$167,653,230.00

Permitted Expenses$28,594,420.00

TOTAL $196,247,650.00

New Jersey

Permitted Expenses$21,306,490.00

TOTAL $144,416,985.00

Nevada

Program Full Allocation

TOTAL $761,622,301.00

Mississippi

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds$123,110,495.00

Program Full Allocation

Program Funds $700,275,448.00

Permitted Expenses $61,346,853.00
TOTAL HHF FUNDING $9,600,000,000.00

TOTAL $302,336,993.00
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

STATE OF NEBRASKA et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al.,

Defendants.

No. 4:22-cv-01040

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Shannon Grammel, Deputy Solicitor General, hereby enters her appearance on behalf of 

Plaintiff State of Kansas in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

DEREK SCHMIDT

Attorney General of Kansas

/s/ Shannon Grammel

Shannon Grammel

Deputy Solicitor General

Office of the Kansas Attorney General

120 S.W. 10th Ave., 2nd Floor

Topeka, Kansas 66612

Tel.: (785) 296-2215

Fax: (785) 291-3767

shannon.grammel@ag.ks.gov

Attorney for Plaintiff State of Kansas

Case: 4:22-cv-01040-HEA Doc. #: 18 Filed: 10/05/22 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 597
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on October 5, 2022, this document was electronically filed with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will serve all counsel of record.

/s/ Shannon Grammel

Shannon Grammel

Case: 4:22-cv-01040-HEA Doc. #: 18 Filed: 10/05/22 Page: 2 of 2 PageID #: 598
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

United States Army School of the Americas (USARSA), Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), U.S. Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following committee meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         USARSA Subcommittee of the Army Education Advisory Committee.                              ( print page 69916)    

*Dates of Meeting:*                         14-15 December 2000.                    

*Place of Meeting:*                         USARSA, Building 35, Fort Benning, Georgia.                    

*Time of Meeting:*                         0830-1630, 14 December and 0830-1000, 15 December 2000.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

All communications regarding this subcommittee should be addressed to LTC Bruce T. Gridley, U.S. Army School of the Americas, ATTN: ATZB-SAZ-CS, Ft. Benning, Georgia 31905-6245.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Proposed Agenda:*                     Presentation by the Commanding General, TRADOC, DUSA-IA, USSOUTHCOM and USARSA's transformation.                 

1. Purpose of Meeting: This is the eighth USARSA Subcommittee meeting. The Subcommittee will receive a report from the Commander, TRADOC, and discuss the transformation of USARSA.

2. Meeting of the Advisory Committee is open to the public. Due to space limitations, attendance may be limited to those persons who have notified the Committee Management Office in writing at least 5 days prior to the meeting date of their intent to attend.

3. Any member of the public may file a written statement with the committee before, during, or after the meeting. To the extent that time permits, the subcommittee chairman may allow public presentations of oral statements at the meeting.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-29759  Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the  issuer), hereby certifies as
follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of the issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 11th day of August, 2006.



/s/ Mary Jo RogersMary Jo Rogers, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to the issuer and will be retained by the issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

CHARLOTTE DIVISION

CASE NO. 3:22-CV-009-MOC-DCK

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac 

Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 5) filed by Karl S. Gwaltney, Esq., concerning Anthony 

Paronich, on January 10, 2022. Anthony Paronich seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for

Plaintiff. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission 

of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion 

For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 5) is GRANTED. Anthony Paronich

is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

DAYBREAK SOLAR POWER, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

)

Signed: January 10, 2022

Case 4:22-cv-00599-O Document 6 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 22