alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
205.52. Tax on sales at retail; rate; applicability; failure to keep..., MI ST 205.52

 © 2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment

Proposed Legislation

Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated

Chapter 205. Taxation

General Sales Tax Act (Refs & Annos)

M.C.L.A. 205.52

205.52. Tax on sales at retail; rate; applicability; failure to keep separate books

Currentness

Sec. 2. (1) Except as provided in section 2a, 1 there is levied upon and there shall be collected from all persons engaged in the

business of making sales at retail, by which ownership of tangible personal property is transferred for consideration, an annual

tax for the privilege of engaging in that business equal to 6% of the gross proceeds of the business, plus the penalty and interest

if applicable as provided by law, less deductions allowed by this act.

(2) The tax under subsection (1) also applies to the following:

(a) The transmission and distribution of electricity, whether the electricity is purchased from the delivering utility or from

another provider, if the sale is made to the consumer or user of the electricity for consumption or use rather than for resale.

(b) The sale of a prepaid telephone calling card or a prepaid authorization number for telephone use, rather than for resale,

including the reauthorization of a prepaid telephone calling card or a prepaid authorization number.

(c) A conditional sale, installment lease sale, or other transfer of property, if title is retained as security for the purchase but

is intended to be transferred later.

(3) Any person engaged in the business of making sales at retail who is at the same time engaged in some other kind of business,

occupation, or profession not taxable under this act shall keep books to show separately the transactions used in determining

the tax levied by this act. If the person fails to keep separate books, there shall be levied upon him or her the tax provided for in

subsection (1) equal to 6% of the entire gross proceeds of both or all of his or her businesses. The taxes levied by this section

are a personal obligation of the taxpayer.

(4) A meal provided free of charge or at a reduced rate to an employee during work hours by a food service establishment licensed

by the Michigan department of agriculture for the convenience of the employer is not considered transferred for consideration.

Credits

Amended by P.A.1984, No. 228, § 1, Imd. Eff. July 30; P.A.1993, No. 325, § 1, Eff. May 1, 1994; P.A.2004, No. 173, Eff.

Sept. 1, 2004.

ATTACHMENT 1
205.52. Tax on sales at retail; rate; applicability; failure to keep..., MI ST 205.52

 © 2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2

Notes of Decisions (78)

Footnotes

1 M.C.L.A. § 205.52a.

M. C. L. A. 205.52, MI ST 205.52

The statutes are current through P.A.2015, No. 130, of the 2015 Regular Session, 98th Legislature.

End of Document © 2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
AFS-10-223-E May 7, 2010 Exemption No. 8368C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-18516

Mr. Scott Rohlfing 3410 Royal Meadow Lane San Jose, CA 95135

Dear Mr. Rohlfing:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8368, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter posted to the docket on April 7, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation

Adm inistration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 8368, as amended. That exemption from § 91.109(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Re gulations allows you to conduct certain flight training in certain Beechcraft Bonanza/Debonair airplanes that are equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8368, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.2

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 8368, as amended, to July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8368, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8368.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
# Official Journal C 165A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 165A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6214 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 165A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6214 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | n/a |
| 2019/C 165 A/01 | Vacancy Notice for the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) — Amsterdam (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20037 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

n/a

2019/C 165 A/01

Vacancy Notice for the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) — Amsterdam (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20037

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 81

Authorizing the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the

Capitol Grounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 19, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be

run through the Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL

4 OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL

5 GROUNDS.

6 On May 27, 1993, or on such other date as the

7 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi8 dent pro tempore of the Senate may designate jointly, the

9 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run through

10 the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special
2

•HCON 81 IH

1 Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olym2 pics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District

3 of Columbia.

4 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

5 The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as

6 may be necessary to carry out section 1.

7 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA8 TIONS.

9 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

10 for physical preparations for the event authorized by

11 section 1.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

s1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

147495

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147495

COA: 315569

Kalkaska CC: 08

- 002967

- FC

LESTER VANDENBOSCH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000116 22-JUN-2015 10:49 AM
#### TAYLOR v. STATE.

No. 21774.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1942.

Eugene F. Mathis, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for selling beer in Floyd County contrary to law, and assessed a fine of $100, from which he appeals.

Bill of exception number one in the case complains of an answer to a question which was not responsive. Objection was duly made and sustained by the court, but it is the contention that the error was so inflammatory that it could not be removed by the court’s ruling. Upon an examination of the statement of facts we are unable to find any reason why the answer would not have been admissible had the proper question been directed to the witness. True, he was charged with selling beer at certain premises, which he denied. The witness, who was an officer, had gone to that street number with a search warrant and did execute the same by searching the premises and found a case of wine. He was asked what he heard the appellant say on that occasion and started to give the answer by saying that after they, “shook the place down and found a case of wine there” — . He was probably interrupted at this point by an objection and did not finish the answer, which might have been responsive to the question. The fact that he found wine on the premises where it appears the beer was sold does not corroborate any statement made by appellant in his own behalf, it is true, but we are unable to see that it is in any sense inflammatory, as stated, and might be admissible for the purpose of corroborating the State’s testimony. At least, the court’s ruling, in our opinion, was sufficient.

Bill of exception number two complains of the following statement made by the County Attorney in arguing the case: “Of course, I told him I could use that in evidence against him because he was not under arrest.” This argument was objected to. The court sustained the objection and instructed the jury not to consider it. The bill does not point out the harm which this argument did and we are unable to discover any which the instruction of the court could not cure.

We find no error which the record presents.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

*913On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant complains because we said in our-original opinion that Bills of Exception Nos. 1 and 2 failed to reflect error. A re-examination of the bills, in the light of his contention, convinces us more firmly of the correctness of our conclusion as expressed in the original opinion.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 261 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 261

     Designating September 14, 1994, as ``Francis Scott Key Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1993

Mr. Bartlett of Maryland (for himself, Mrs. Bentley, Mrs. Morella, Mr. 
 Cardin, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Gilchrest, and Mr. Mfume) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     Designating September 14, 1994, as ``Francis Scott Key Day''.

Whereas Francis Scott Key, lawyer, family man, community leader, patriot, and 
        poet, traveled from Washington, D.C., to Baltimore, Maryland, to seek 
        the freedom of a United States citizen held captive by the British 
        during the War of 1812;
Whereas Francis Scott Key was detained by the British to prevent him from 
        revealing the plans to attack Baltimore and was forced to witness the 
        British assault on Fort McHenry in Baltimore harbor;
Whereas Francis Scott Key was so moved with joy, relief, and exhilaration when 
        he saw the United States flag still flying to indicate the failure of 
        the British attack that he was inspired to compose the poem, at first 
        called ``Defence of Fort M'Henry'', which later became the lyrics of our 
        national anthem, ``The Star-Spangled Banner'';
Whereas an Act of the Congress made ``The Star-Spangled Banner'' our national 
        anthem;
Whereas the national anthem is firmly entrenched as a symbol of the spirit of 
        the United States and is beloved by all the people of the United States; 
        and
Whereas Francis Scott Key has not been given sufficient national recognition for 
        his contributions to our Nation's heritage and spirit: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That September 14, 1994, is 
designated as ``Francis Scott Key Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```
'^'^PARTMFNT OF 

SfcRVED JULY 18, 201 1 'fiAA'SPORTATIOiM 

''OCKBOPERATiONS 

U.S. DIIPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 20!' JUL I 8 P ?• ^fl 

OmCB 01-HEARINGS " ' ^^ 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN TlIE MATTER OP 

M&R HELICOPTERS, LLC 

•AA DOCKET NO. CRIOSOOOI 

(Civil I'criiilty Action) 

PDMSNO. FAA-20I0- 1211 

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CREDENTIALS AND LICENSING 

INFORMATION" OF LAURA PONTO 

This matter is before the undersigned and will be set for hearing. 

Laura Ponto is not a party to this case, nor is any other attorney in the employ of 

the Federal Aviation Administration. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent's "Request ibr 'Credentials and Licensing 

Information" of Laura Ponlo, or any other attorney representing the Federal Aviation 

Administration, past, present and/or future, be and is hereby DENIED. 

iwm 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPlOSOOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

REVISED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

MichaelB. Selig, MD,FACC, 

Respondent's RepresenUidve 

28l6 0rerield Road 

Allentown, PA 18104 

TEL: 610-360-3953 

FAX: 

Charles Raley, Comp/ainant \s Counsel 

Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3357 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

Administrative Lmv Judge 

U.S. Department of Transponation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 . 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL; Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Serv'ice was by U.S. Mai!. For serx'ice in person or by expedited courier, use (he following address" Federal 

Aviation Administration. 600 Independence Avenue. S.W.. Wilbur Wnghl Building—Suite 2WI00O Wasliinmon 

DC 20591: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430 ' 

- 9 -
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 28, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30162]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-1 J1.
    Date: December 3-5, 2000.
    Time: 7:00 pm to 12:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Iowa City Hotel, 210 South Dubuque Street, Iowa 
City, IA 52240.
    Contact Person: Carolyn Miles, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 641, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-7791.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-7 J1.
    Date: December 3-5, 2000.
    Time: 7:30 PM to 12:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Chapel Hill, 1 Europa Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 
27514
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 659, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-7799.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-6 J1.
    Date: January 4-5, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 
22202.
    Contact Person: Neal A. Musto, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 651, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-7798.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.949, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: November 16, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30162 Filed 11-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Official Journal L 268/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 268 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6018 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 268

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6018 October 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations (SGEI)
  (notified under document C(2016) 4862)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations (SGEI)
  (notified under document C(2016) 4862)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2016) 4862)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000941914
<NAME>                        SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        1143
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 13098
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              19442
<PP&E>                        69610
<DEPRECIATION>                19891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                71165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         10443
<BONDS>                       24999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      50
<OTHER-SE>                    28361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  71165
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              89356
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 80926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1243
<INCOME-PRETAX>               7187
<INCOME-TAX>                  3006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           4181
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  4181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .83
        


</TABLE>