# Official Journal L 16/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 16 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5823 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 16

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5823 January 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/96 of 1 October 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/97 of 17 October 2014 correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 as regards the notification of significant net short positions in sovereign debt (
  1
  ) | 22 |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/98 of 18 November 2014 on the implementation of the Union's international obligations, as referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, under the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas and the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries | 23 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/99 of 20 January 2015 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Arroz de Valencia/Arròs de València (PDO)] | 27 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/100 of 20 January 2015 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Halberstädter Würstchen (PGI)) | 28 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/101 of 22 January 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 29 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/102 of 20 January 2015 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/4/2014 (ATALANTA/1/2015) | 31 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2015) 53) | 33 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/96 of 1 October 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/97 of 17 October 2014 correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 as regards the notification of significant net short positions in sovereign debt (
  1
  )

1

22

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/98 of 18 November 2014 on the implementation of the Union's international obligations, as referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, under the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas and the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries

23

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/99 of 20 January 2015 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Arroz de Valencia/Arròs de València (PDO)]

27

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/100 of 20 January 2015 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Halberstädter Würstchen (PGI))

28

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/101 of 22 January 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

29

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/102 of 20 January 2015 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/4/2014 (ATALANTA/1/2015)

31

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2015) 53)

(notified under document C(2015) 53)

33

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 of 29 November 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the People's Republic of China and terminating the proceeding concerning imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan ( OJ L 315, 1.12.2010 ) | 66 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 of 29 November 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the People's Republic of China and terminating the proceeding concerning imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan ( OJ L 315, 1.12.2010 )

( OJ L 315, 1.12.2010 )

66

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/1

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2015/96

of 1 October 2014

supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements of agricultural and forestry vehicles

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 February 2013 on the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles (1), and in particular Article 19(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured. To that end, a comprehensive EU type-approval system and a strengthened market surveillance system for agricultural and forestry vehicles and their systems, components and separate technical units was established by Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 apply. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured. To that end, a comprehensive EU type-approval system and a strengthened market surveillance system for agricultural and forestry vehicles and their systems, components and separate technical units was established by Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 apply.

| (2) | The term ‘agricultural and forestry vehicles’ covers a wide range of different vehicle types with one or more axles and two, four or more wheels or track-laying vehicles, e.g. wheeled tractors, track-laying tractors, trailers and towed equipment, used for a wide variety of agricultural and forestry purposes, including special purpose works. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The term ‘agricultural and forestry vehicles’ covers a wide range of different vehicle types with one or more axles and two, four or more wheels or track-laying vehicles, e.g. wheeled tractors, track-laying tractors, trailers and towed equipment, used for a wide variety of agricultural and forestry purposes, including special purpose works.

| (3) | Following the request of the European Parliament and with the aim of simplifying and accelerating the adoption of type-approval legislation, a new regulatory approach has been introduced in Union vehicle type-approval legislation in accordance with which the legislator in the ordinary legislative procedure sets out the fundamental rules and principles only and delegates the power to adopt delegated acts concerning further technical details to the Commission. In accordance with this principle, Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 lays down the fundamental provisions on functional safety, occupational safety and environmental performance and delegates to the Commission the power to lay down the corresponding technical specifications in delegated acts. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following the request of the European Parliament and with the aim of simplifying and accelerating the adoption of type-approval legislation, a new regulatory approach has been introduced in Union vehicle type-approval legislation in accordance with which the legislator in the ordinary legislative procedure sets out the fundamental rules and principles only and delegates the power to adopt delegated acts concerning further technical details to the Commission. In accordance with this principle, Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 lays down the fundamental provisions on functional safety, occupational safety and environmental performance and delegates to the Commission the power to lay down the corresponding technical specifications in delegated acts.

| (4) | Therefore, the technical requirements for the type-approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles with regard to their environmental and propulsion unit performance should now be set out. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Therefore, the technical requirements for the type-approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles with regard to their environmental and propulsion unit performance should now be set out.

| (5) | In 2010, the Commission established a European strategy on clean and energy efficient vehicles (2). This strategy proposed the Union to act in the areas where it can have distinct value added and complement the actions taken by the industry, national and regional public authorities. Those actions should aim at improving the environmental performance of vehicles and at the same time strengthening the competitiveness of the Union automotive industry In particular, a considerable reduction in hydrocarbon emissions from agricultural and forestry vehicles is necessary to improve air quality and comply with limit values for pollution. This should be achieved not only by reducing the hydrocarbon tailpipe and evaporative emissions from these vehicles, but also by helping reducing volatile particle levels. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In 2010, the Commission established a European strategy on clean and energy efficient vehicles (2). This strategy proposed the Union to act in the areas where it can have distinct value added and complement the actions taken by the industry, national and regional public authorities. Those actions should aim at improving the environmental performance of vehicles and at the same time strengthening the competitiveness of the Union automotive industry In particular, a considerable reduction in hydrocarbon emissions from agricultural and forestry vehicles is necessary to improve air quality and comply with limit values for pollution. This should be achieved not only by reducing the hydrocarbon tailpipe and evaporative emissions from these vehicles, but also by helping reducing volatile particle levels.

| (6) | By referring to the provisions of Directive 97/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (3), this Regulation lays down the limit values for emissions of gaseous and particulate matter pollutants to be applied in successive stages, and the test procedure for internal combustion engines intended to power agricultural or forestry vehicles. The IIIA, IIIB and IV Stage emission limits for agricultural and forestry vehicle engines, by setting ambitious gaseous and particulate matter pollutant emission limits while aligning with international standards, are one of the measures designed to reduce emissions of particulate matter and ozone precursors such as nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

By referring to the provisions of Directive 97/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (3), this Regulation lays down the limit values for emissions of gaseous and particulate matter pollutants to be applied in successive stages, and the test procedure for internal combustion engines intended to power agricultural or forestry vehicles. The IIIA, IIIB and IV Stage emission limits for agricultural and forestry vehicle engines, by setting ambitious gaseous and particulate matter pollutant emission limits while aligning with international standards, are one of the measures designed to reduce emissions of particulate matter and ozone precursors such as nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons.

| (7) | A standardised method of measuring fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions of agricultural and forestry vehicle engines, is necessary to ensure that no technical barriers to trade arise between Member States. Furthermore, it is also appropriate to ensure that customers and users are supplied with objective and precise information. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

A standardised method of measuring fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions of agricultural and forestry vehicle engines, is necessary to ensure that no technical barriers to trade arise between Member States. Furthermore, it is also appropriate to ensure that customers and users are supplied with objective and precise information.

| (8) | One of the main objectives of Union legislation on the approval of vehicles is to ensure that new vehicles, components and separate technical units placed on the market provide a high level of environmental protection. That objective should not be impaired by the fitting of certain parts or equipment after vehicles have been placed on the market or have entered into service. Thus, appropriate measures should be taken in order to make sure that parts or equipment which can be fitted to agricultural and forestry vehicles and which are capable of significantly impairing the functioning of systems that are essential in terms of environmental protection, are subject to prior control by an approval authority before they are placed on the market. Those measures should consist of technical provisions concerning the requirements that those parts or equipment have to comply with. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

One of the main objectives of Union legislation on the approval of vehicles is to ensure that new vehicles, components and separate technical units placed on the market provide a high level of environmental protection. That objective should not be impaired by the fitting of certain parts or equipment after vehicles have been placed on the market or have entered into service. Thus, appropriate measures should be taken in order to make sure that parts or equipment which can be fitted to agricultural and forestry vehicles and which are capable of significantly impairing the functioning of systems that are essential in terms of environmental protection, are subject to prior control by an approval authority before they are placed on the market. Those measures should consist of technical provisions concerning the requirements that those parts or equipment have to comply with.

| (9) | Directive 2003/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council (4) provided for the EC whole-vehicle type-approval of all-terrain vehicles and side-by-side vehicles as agricultural and forestry vehicles. Those vehicle types should therefore also be covered by this Regulation with respect to their environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements, provided that the type of vehicle concerned falls within a vehicle category as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Directive 2003/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council (4) provided for the EC whole-vehicle type-approval of all-terrain vehicles and side-by-side vehicles as agricultural and forestry vehicles. Those vehicle types should therefore also be covered by this Regulation with respect to their environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements, provided that the type of vehicle concerned falls within a vehicle category as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

| (10) | Technical progress requires adaptation of the technical requirements set out in the Annexes to this Directive. The engine categories, limit values and implementation dates in this should be aligned to future changes in Directive 97/68/EC in accordance with Article 71 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Technical progress requires adaptation of the technical requirements set out in the Annexes to this Directive. The engine categories, limit values and implementation dates in this should be aligned to future changes in Directive 97/68/EC in accordance with Article 71 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

| (11) | Environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements in respect to gaseous and particulate matter pollutant emissions should not apply to vehicles equipped with engines not covered by the scope of application of Directive 97/68/EC until the date when those engines become covered by that Directive. However, vehicles equipped with engines not covered by the scope of application of Directive 97/68/EC may be granted whole vehicle type-approval under this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements in respect to gaseous and particulate matter pollutant emissions should not apply to vehicles equipped with engines not covered by the scope of application of Directive 97/68/EC until the date when those engines become covered by that Directive. However, vehicles equipped with engines not covered by the scope of application of Directive 97/68/EC may be granted whole vehicle type-approval under this Regulation.

| (12) | By Council Decision 97/836/EC (5), the Union has acceded to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (Revised 1958 Agreement). In its Communication CARS 2020: Action Plan for a competitive and sustainable automotive industry in Europe, the Commission highlighted that the acceptance of international regulations under the 1958 UNECE Agreement is the best way to remove non-tariff barriers to trade. Therefore, the requirements set out in the Directives repealed by Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 should be replaced, where appropriate, with references to the corresponding UNECE regulations. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

By Council Decision 97/836/EC (5), the Union has acceded to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (Revised 1958 Agreement). In its Communication CARS 2020: Action Plan for a competitive and sustainable automotive industry in Europe, the Commission highlighted that the acceptance of international regulations under the 1958 UNECE Agreement is the best way to remove non-tariff barriers to trade. Therefore, the requirements set out in the Directives repealed by Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 should be replaced, where appropriate, with references to the corresponding UNECE regulations.

| (13) | The possibility to apply UNECE regulations for the purpose of EU vehicle type-approval as a basis to the Union legislation is provided for in Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. In accordance with this Regulation type-approval in accordance with UNECE regulations which apply on an equal basis to the Union legislation is to be considered as EU type-approval in accordance with that Regulation and its delegated and implementing acts. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The possibility to apply UNECE regulations for the purpose of EU vehicle type-approval as a basis to the Union legislation is provided for in Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. In accordance with this Regulation type-approval in accordance with UNECE regulations which apply on an equal basis to the Union legislation is to be considered as EU type-approval in accordance with that Regulation and its delegated and implementing acts.

| (14) | Using UNECE regulations on an equal basis to Union legislation helps to avoid duplication not only of technical requirements but also of certification and administrative procedures. In addition, type-approval that is directly based on internationally agreed standards should improve market access in third countries, in particular in those which are contracting parties to the Revised 1958 Agreement, thus enhancing the Union industry's competitiveness. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Using UNECE regulations on an equal basis to Union legislation helps to avoid duplication not only of technical requirements but also of certification and administrative procedures. In addition, type-approval that is directly based on internationally agreed standards should improve market access in third countries, in particular in those which are contracting parties to the Revised 1958 Agreement, thus enhancing the Union industry's competitiveness.

| (15) | Given the scale and impact of the action proposed in the sector in question, the Union measures in this Regulation are indispensable if the environmental and safety objectives set, namely the approval of vehicles in the Union, are to be achieved. These objectives cannot be adequately achieved by the Member States acting individually. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Given the scale and impact of the action proposed in the sector in question, the Union measures in this Regulation are indispensable if the environmental and safety objectives set, namely the approval of vehicles in the Union, are to be achieved. These objectives cannot be adequately achieved by the Member States acting individually.

| (16) | Since environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements of agricultural and forestry vehicles are essential for the type-approval of these vehicles, this Regulation should apply as from date of application of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Since environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements of agricultural and forestry vehicles are essential for the type-approval of these vehicles, this Regulation should apply as from date of application of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

CHAPTER I

SUBJECT MATTER AND DEFINITIONS

Article 1

Subject matter

This Regulation establishes the detailed technical requirements and test procedures regarding environmental and propulsion unit performance with respect to pollutant emissions and permissible external sound levels, and the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles, their engines and their systems, components and separate technical units in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

Article 2

Definitions

For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 shall apply. The following definitions shall also apply:

| (1) | ‘emitted pollutants’ means gaseous and particulate matter exhaust pollutant emissions; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

‘emitted pollutants’ means gaseous and particulate matter exhaust pollutant emissions;

| (2) | ‘pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system’ means the passage of exhaust gases through a device or system whose purpose is to chemically or physically alter the emitted pollutants prior to their release to the atmosphere, including catalysts, particulate matter traps or any other component, system or separate technical unit for the reduction or treatment of the engine gaseous and particulate matter exhaust pollutant emissions; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

‘pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system’ means the passage of exhaust gases through a device or system whose purpose is to chemically or physically alter the emitted pollutants prior to their release to the atmosphere, including catalysts, particulate matter traps or any other component, system or separate technical unit for the reduction or treatment of the engine gaseous and particulate matter exhaust pollutant emissions;

| (3) | ‘external sound emissions abatement system’ means all the components and separate technical units that comprise the exhaust and the silencing system, including the exhaust system, the air intake system, the silencer or any systems, components, and separate technical units with a relevance to the permissible external sound levels emitted by the agricultural or forestry vehicle, of a type fitted to the vehicle at the time of type-approval or extension of type-approval; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

‘external sound emissions abatement system’ means all the components and separate technical units that comprise the exhaust and the silencing system, including the exhaust system, the air intake system, the silencer or any systems, components, and separate technical units with a relevance to the permissible external sound levels emitted by the agricultural or forestry vehicle, of a type fitted to the vehicle at the time of type-approval or extension of type-approval;

| (4) | ‘pollution control device’ means a component system or separate technical unit which is part of the pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system |
| --- | --- |

(4)

‘pollution control device’ means a component system or separate technical unit which is part of the pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system

| (5) | ‘replacement pollution control device’ means a component system or separate technical unit intended to replace, partially or fully, a pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system on a vehicle type-approved in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and this Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

(5)

‘replacement pollution control device’ means a component system or separate technical unit intended to replace, partially or fully, a pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system on a vehicle type-approved in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and this Regulation;

| (6) | ‘engine type’ means a category of engines which do not differ in such essential engine characteristics as specified in Appendix 1 of Annex II, to Directive 97/68/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(6)

‘engine type’ means a category of engines which do not differ in such essential engine characteristics as specified in Appendix 1 of Annex II, to Directive 97/68/EC;

| (7) | ‘parent engine’ means an engine representative of the propulsion unit or engine family as set out in point 7 of Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(7)

‘parent engine’ means an engine representative of the propulsion unit or engine family as set out in point 7 of Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC;

| (8) | ‘engine family’ means a grouping of engines of a manufacturer in accordance to point 6 of Annex I of Directive 97/68/EC which, due to their design, are expected to have similar exhaust pollutant emission characteristics and which comply with the requirements of this Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

(8)

‘engine family’ means a grouping of engines of a manufacturer in accordance to point 6 of Annex I of Directive 97/68/EC which, due to their design, are expected to have similar exhaust pollutant emission characteristics and which comply with the requirements of this Regulation;

| (9) | ‘replacement engine’ means a newly built engine intended to replace an engine in an agricultural or forestry vehicle and which has been supplied for that purpose only; |
| --- | --- |

(9)

‘replacement engine’ means a newly built engine intended to replace an engine in an agricultural or forestry vehicle and which has been supplied for that purpose only;

| (10) | ‘auxiliaries’ means all equipment, apparatus and devices listed in Table 1 of Annex 4 to UNECE Regulation No 120 01 series of amendments; |
| --- | --- |

(10)

‘auxiliaries’ means all equipment, apparatus and devices listed in Table 1 of Annex 4 to UNECE Regulation No 120 01 series of amendments;

| (11) | ‘engine power’ means the power obtained on a test bench at the end of the crankshaft or its equivalent at the corresponding engine speed; |
| --- | --- |

(11)

‘engine power’ means the power obtained on a test bench at the end of the crankshaft or its equivalent at the corresponding engine speed;

| (12) | ‘net engine power’ means the engine power obtained on a test bench at the end of the crankshaft or its equivalent at the corresponding engine speed with the auxiliaries and equipment listed in Table 1 of Annex 4 to UNECE Regulation No 120 01 series of amendments (6), determined under reference atmospheric conditions. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

‘net engine power’ means the engine power obtained on a test bench at the end of the crankshaft or its equivalent at the corresponding engine speed with the auxiliaries and equipment listed in Table 1 of Annex 4 to UNECE Regulation No 120 01 series of amendments (6), determined under reference atmospheric conditions.

6

CHAPTER II

OBLIGATIONS OF MANUFACTURERS

Article 3

General obligations

1.   The manufacturer shall ensure that all new vehicles placed on the market, registered or entering into service within the Union, all new and replacement engines placed on the market or entering into service within the Union and all new systems, components and separate technical units that may affect the vehicle's environmental and propulsion unit performance which are placed on the market or enter into service within the Union are designed, constructed and assembled so as to enable the vehicle, in normal use and maintained in accordance with the prescriptions of the manufacturer, to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.

2.   The manufacturer of vehicles, engines, systems, components and separate technical units shall demonstrate to the approval authority, by means of physical demonstration and testing, that the vehicles, engines, systems, components and separate technical units made available on the market, registered or entering into service in the Union comply with the detailed technical requirements and test procedures laid down in Articles 6 to 9a and Annexes I and II of Directive 97/68/EC.

3.   This Article shall not apply to vehicle types for export to third countries.

Article 4

General requirements on pollutant emissions and external sound levels

1.   The manufacturer shall comply with the requirements regarding pollutant emissions laid down in Annexes I and II.

The manufacturer shall comply with the requirements regarding external sound level laid down in Annex III.

2.   The type-approval regarding exhaust pollutant emissions and external sound level requirements may be extended by the type-approval authorities to different vehicle variants, versions and engine types and families, provided that the vehicle variant, propulsion unit and pollution control system parameters have an identical performance or remain within the levels specified in Article 19(4) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

3.   The manufacturer shall report without delay to the approval authority any modification to systems, components and separate technical units that may affect the environmental and propulsion unit performance of the agricultural and forestry vehicle after the approved vehicle type is placed on the market in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. The obligation to report shall include the following:

| (a) | the parameters of the type or engine family, as set out in Annex II to Directive 97/68/EC and in point 9 of Annex I to this Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the parameters of the type or engine family, as set out in Annex II to Directive 97/68/EC and in point 9 of Annex I to this Regulation;

| (b) | the engine's pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system, as described in point 6 of Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC and point 9.1 of Annex I and point 3.2 of Annex II to this Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the engine's pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment system, as described in point 6 of Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC and point 9.1 of Annex I and point 3.2 of Annex II to this Regulation;

| (c) | the external sound emissions abatement system of the vehicle, in accordance with the requirements of Annex III. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the external sound emissions abatement system of the vehicle, in accordance with the requirements of Annex III.

4.   In addition to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 and Article 14, the manufacturer shall comply to the following environmental and propulsion unit requirements:

| (d) | as regards the reference fuels, the requirements set-out in Annex 7 to UNECE Regulation No 120. 01 series of amendments and Annex V to Directive 97/68/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

as regards the reference fuels, the requirements set-out in Annex 7 to UNECE Regulation No 120. 01 series of amendments and Annex V to Directive 97/68/EC;

| (e) | as regards pollution control devices and replacement pollution control devices, the requirements set out in Appendix 5 of Annex III to Directive 97/68/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

as regards pollution control devices and replacement pollution control devices, the requirements set out in Appendix 5 of Annex III to Directive 97/68/EC;

| (f) | as regards test equipment, the requirements set out in Annex III to Directive 97/68/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(f)

as regards test equipment, the requirements set out in Annex III to Directive 97/68/EC.

5.   The manufacturer shall provide evidence to the approval authority that the changes referred to in paragraph 3 do not deteriorate the environmental performance of a vehicle in relation to the environmental performance demonstrated at type-approval.

6.   The manufacturer shall demonstrate that replacement pollution control devices requiring type-approval pursuant to Articles 9 to 13 of this Regulation, which are placed on the market or enter into service in the Union are approved in accordance with the detailed technical requirements and test procedures set out in point 4.1.1. of Annex I of Directive 97/68/EC, where applicable.

7.   Vehicles equipped with a replacement pollution control device shall meet the same environmental test requirements and pollutant emission limit values as vehicles equipped with an original pollution control device.

Article 5

Specific obligations with respect to type approval of vehicles or engines

1.   The manufacturer shall ensure that the gaseous and particulate matter exhaust pollutant emissions of the engine type do not exceed the gaseous and particulate matter exhaust pollutant emissions as specified for the engine categories and power ranges under the scope of Directive 97/68/EC.

2.   The manufacturer shall ensure that the propulsion unit performance corresponds to the level reported to the approval authority in the information folder when making the vehicle available on the market or before its entry into service.

The use of defeat devices, as defined in point 2.8c of Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC, that reduce the effectiveness of emission control equipment shall be prohibited in accordance to point 4.1.1 of Annex III to Directive 97/68/EC.

3.   Changes to the make of a system, component or separate technical unit that occur after a type-approval shall not automatically invalidate a type-approval, unless its original characteristics or technical parameters are changed in such a way that the functionality of the engine or pollution control system is affected.

Article 6

Requirements for type-approval of engines as a separate technical unit

In order to receive an EU type-approval of an engine or engine family as a separate technical unit, the manufacturer shall, in accordance with the provisions of Annex I of this Regulation, demonstrate that the engines are subject to the tests and comply with the requirements set out in this Regulation and in Directive 97/68/EC.

CHAPTER III

OBLIGATIONS OF THE MEMBER STATES

Article 7

Equivalence of alternative type-approvals

1.   National authorities shall recognise alternative type-approvals as equivalent to an approval under this Regulation in accordance with Annex IV.

2.   In addition to the requirements referred to in the first subparagraph, for an alternative type-approval to be recognised as equivalent to an approval under this Regulation, the manufacturer shall provide non-discriminatory access to vehicle repair and maintenance information as required by Chapter XV of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and the corresponding delegated act.

Article 8

Measurement of pollutant emissions

The technical services shall measure the pollutant exhaust emissions of agricultural and forestry vehicles and engines in accordance with the provisions of Directive 97/68/EC as adapted by the requirements of Annex I to this Regulation.

Article 9

Measurement of the external sound level

1.   The technical services shall measure the external sound level of agricultural and forestry vehicles of category T equipped with pneumatic tyres and of category C equipped with rubber tracks, for type-approval purposes, in accordance with the test conditions and methods set out in point 1.3.1 of Annex III.

2.   The test conditions and methods set out in point 1.3.2 of Annex III shall also be carried out and the results shall be recorded by the technical services in accordance to the provisions of point 1.3.2.4 of Annex III.

3.   The technical services shall measure the external sound level of agricultural and forestry vehicles of category C equipped with metallic tracks, for type-approval purposes, in accordance with the stationary test conditions and methods set out in point 1.3.2 of Annex III.

4.   The test conditions and methods set out in point 1.3.3 of Annex III shall also be carried out and the results recorded by the technical services.

Article 10

Requirements on propulsion unit performance

For the evaluation of propulsion unit performance of agricultural and forestry vehicles, measurements of net engine power, engine torque and specific fuel consumption shall be carried out in accordance with UNECE Regulation No 120, 01 series of amendments.

Article 11

Specific provisions concerning Type approval of vehicles or engines

1.   Type-approvals may be granted to vehicles equipped with engines not covered by the scope of application of Directive 97/68/EC.

2.   From 24 months after the date of entry into force of the legislation extending the scope of Directive 97/68/EC to vehicles equipped with engines not currently covered by the scope of application of that directive [or on 1 January 2018 at the latest], Member States shall refuse to grant type-approvals under this Regulation to vehicles not complying with all the requirements of this Regulation.

3.   Type-approvals granted under the first paragraph shall cease to be valid three years after the date of entry into force of the legislation extending the scope of Directive 97/68/EC to those engines [or on 31 December 2018 at the latest].

With effect from 1 January 2019, Member States shall consider certificates of conformity in respect of new vehicles to be no longer valid for the purposes of Article 38 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, and prohibit the registration, sale and entry into service of such vehicles.

4.   For the purposes of type-approval, the dates set out in Article 9(3c), 9(3d) and 9(4a) of Directive 97/68/EC shall, for agricultural and forestry vehicles of categories T2, T4.1 and C2, as defined in Articles 4(3), (6) and (9) and 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and equipped with engines of categories L to R, be postponed for 3 years. The transition and derogation clauses in Articles 9(4a) and 10(5) of Directive 97/68/EC and Article 39 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 shall also be delayed accordingly.

5.   Replacement engines shall comply with the same limit values that the engine to be replaced had to meet when originally placed on the market.

6.   Replacement engines shall be marked in accordance with the Appendix to Annex I.

Article 12

EU type-approval procedures

Without prejudice to Article 11 and subject to entry into force of the implementing measures referred to in Article 68 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, if a manufacturer so requests, national authorities may not, on grounds relating to emissions of vehicles, refuse to grant EU type-approval or national type-approval for a new type of vehicle or engine, or prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of a new vehicle and the sale or use of new engines, where the vehicle or engines concerned comply with this Regulation and its implementing measures.

Article 13

Making available on the market or installation on a vehicle of replacement pollution control devices

Replacement pollution control devices which are also covered by a system type- approval with respect to a vehicle shall not be subject to any additional component or separate technical unit approval in accordance with Article 26(3) or Regulation EU No 167/2013.

Article 14

Flexibility scheme

1.   By way of derogation from Article 10(3), Member States shall allow the placing on the market of a limited number of vehicles fitted with engines meeting the requirements of Article 9 of Directive 97/68/CE under a flexibility scheme, in accordance to the provisions of Annex V, at the request of the manufacturer, and on condition that an approval authority has granted the relevant permit for entry into service.

2.   The flexibility scheme set out in paragraph 1 shall apply from the moment each stage begins and shall have the same duration as the stage itself.

The flexibility scheme referred to in point 1.2 of Annex V shall be restricted to the duration of Stage III B or to a period of three years where no subsequent stage exists.

3.   Vehicle types entering into service under the flexibility scheme shall be equipped with engine types which comply with the provisions of Annex V.

CHAPTER IV

FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 15

Entry into force and application

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

It shall apply from 1 January 2016.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.

Done at Brussels, 1 October 2014.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 60, 2.3.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  COM(2010)186 final, 28.4.2010.

2

(3)  Directive 97/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery (OJ L 59, 27.2.1998, p. 1).

3

(4)  Directive 2003/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 26 May 2003 on the type-approval of agricultural or forestry tractors, their trailers and interchangeable towed machinery, together with their systems, components and separate technical units and repealing Directive 74/150/EEC (OJ L 171, 9.7.2003, p. 1).

4

(5)  Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (‘Revised 1958 Agreement’) (OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78).

5

(6)  
  OJ L 257, 30.9.2010, p. 298.

6

---

LIST OF ANNEXES

| Annex Number | Annex title | Page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| I | Requirements for the EU type-approval of a type of engine or engine family for an agricultural and forestry vehicle type as a separate technical unit regarding the pollutants emitted | 15 |
| II | Requirements for the EU type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type equipped with an engine type or engine family regarding the pollutants emitted | 21 |
| III | External sound emission requirements | 23 |
| IV | Recognition of alternative type-approvals | 27 |
| V | Provisions for agricultural and forestry vehicles and engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme laid down in Article 14 | 28 |

Annex Number

Annex title

Page

I

Requirements for the EU type-approval of a type of engine or engine family for an agricultural and forestry vehicle type as a separate technical unit regarding the pollutants emitted

15

II

Requirements for the EU type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type equipped with an engine type or engine family regarding the pollutants emitted

21

III

External sound emission requirements

23

IV

Recognition of alternative type-approvals

27

V

Provisions for agricultural and forestry vehicles and engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme laid down in Article 14

28

---

ANNEX I

Requirements for the EU type-approval of a type of engine or engine family for an agricultural and forestry vehicle type as a separate technical unit regarding the pollutants emitted

1.   General

The provisions of Directive 97/68/EC shall apply to the EU type-approval of a type of engine or engine family for an agricultural and forestry vehicle type as a separate technical unit in terms of the emitted pollutants with the following adaptations:

| 1.1. | For the purposes of this Regulation, the references to non-road mobile machinery in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as references to agricultural and forestry vehicle. |
| --- | --- |

1.1.

For the purposes of this Regulation, the references to non-road mobile machinery in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as references to agricultural and forestry vehicle.

| 1.2. | For the purposes of this Regulation, the references to original equipment manufacturer (OEM) in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as vehicle manufacturer. |
| --- | --- |

1.2.

For the purposes of this Regulation, the references to original equipment manufacturer (OEM) in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as vehicle manufacturer.

| 1.3. | For the purposes of this Regulation, the dates for placing on the market of engines referred to in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as dates for initial entry into service of engines and vehicles. |
| --- | --- |

1.3.

For the purposes of this Regulation, the dates for placing on the market of engines referred to in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as dates for initial entry into service of engines and vehicles.

| 1.4. | For the purposes of this Regulation, the dates for type-approval of engine type and engine families in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as dates for EU type-approval or national type-approval for a type or family of engines or a vehicle type. |
| --- | --- |

1.4.

For the purposes of this Regulation, the dates for type-approval of engine type and engine families in Directive 97/68/EC shall be read as dates for EU type-approval or national type-approval for a type or family of engines or a vehicle type.

2.   Application for EU type-approval of a type or engine family as a separate technical unit.

| 2.1. | The application for the type-approval of an engine type or family in terms of the emitted pollutants shall be submitted by the engine manufacturer or his representative. |
| --- | --- |

2.1.

The application for the type-approval of an engine type or family in terms of the emitted pollutants shall be submitted by the engine manufacturer or his representative.

| 2.2. | The application for type-approval shall be accompanied by the information folder in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68 (c) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

2.2.

The application for type-approval shall be accompanied by the information folder in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68 (c) of that Regulation.

| 2.3. | An engine conforming to the engine type or parent engine characteristics described in Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC shall be submitted to the technical service responsible for conducting the approval tests. |
| --- | --- |

2.3.

An engine conforming to the engine type or parent engine characteristics described in Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC shall be submitted to the technical service responsible for conducting the approval tests.

3.   Specifications and Tests

The provisions of Annex I, sections 4, 8 and 9, Appendixes 1 and 2, and Annexes III, IV and V to Directive 97/68/EC shall apply.

4.   Type-approval of systems, components and separate technical units

Having regard to the provisions for EU type-approval set out in Chapters IV to VII, IX and X of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, separate technical units, components and systems affecting environmental and propulsion unit performance of agricultural and forestry vehicles shall be type-approved before being put on the market or first entering into service.

In accordance with Articles 19 and 52 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, those requirements apply in particular to:

| — | engines, |
| --- | --- |

—

engines,

| — | pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment systems, |
| --- | --- |

—

pollutant exhaust emissions after-treatment systems,

| — | external sound emissions abatement system. |
| --- | --- |

—

external sound emissions abatement system.

Type-approval information documents shall be in accordance with the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 68 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

5.   Engine marking

The engine shall be marked in accordance with the requirements set out in Article 34 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68(h) of that Regulation.

6.   Conformity of production

In addition to the provisions in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, the conformity of production of engines shall be checked in accordance with the provisions of point 5 of Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC.

7.   Notification on the issue of approvals

Notice of the approval, extension, refusal or withdrawal of approval or of production definitely discontinued in relation to an engine type pursuant to this Annex or an agricultural and forestry vehicle type pursuant to Annex II must be communicated by the manufacturer to the Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 31 and Chapter XVI of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

8.   Market surveillance

Having regard to Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, market surveillance shall be performed in accordance with the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 68 (g), (j) and (m) of that Regulation.

9.   Engine family

9.1.   Parameters defining the engine family

The engine family may be defined by basic design parameters which must be common to all engines within the family. In some cases there may be interaction of parameters. These effects must also be taken into consideration in order to ensure that only engines with similar exhaust pollutant emission characteristics are included within an engine family.

For engines to be considered to belong to the same engine family, the following list of basic parameters must be common.

| 9.1.1. | Combustion cycle: 2 stroke/4 stroke |
| --- | --- |

9.1.1.

Combustion cycle: 2 stroke/4 stroke

| 9.1.2. | Cooling medium: air/water/oil |
| --- | --- |

9.1.2.

Cooling medium: air/water/oil

| 9.1.3. | Individual cylinder displacement






  — | within 85 % and 100 % of the largest displacement within the engine family |
| --- | --- | --- |

9.1.3.

Individual cylinder displacement

—

within 85 % and 100 % of the largest displacement within the engine family

| 9.1.4. | Method of air aspiration: naturally aspirated/pressure charged |
| --- | --- |

9.1.4.

Method of air aspiration: naturally aspirated/pressure charged

| 9.1.5. | Fuel type: Diesel/Petrol |
| --- | --- |

9.1.5.

Fuel type: Diesel/Petrol

| 9.1.6. | Combustion chamber type/design |
| --- | --- |

9.1.6.

Combustion chamber type/design

| 9.1.7. | Valve and porting — configuration, size and number |
| --- | --- |

9.1.7.

Valve and porting — configuration, size and number

| 9.1.8. | Fuel system
  For diesel:






  — | pump-line-injector |
| --- | --- | --- |

9.1.8.

Fuel system

For diesel:

—

pump-line-injector

| — | in-line pump |
| --- | --- |

—

in-line pump

| — | distributor pump |
| --- | --- |

—

distributor pump

| — | single element |
| --- | --- |

—

single element

| — | unit injector |
| --- | --- |

—

unit injector

For petrol:

| — | carburettor |
| --- | --- |

—

carburettor

| — | port fuel injection |
| --- | --- |

—

port fuel injection

| — | direct injection |
| --- | --- |

—

direct injection

| 9.1.9. | Miscellaneous features






  — | Exhaust gas recirculation |
| --- | --- | --- |

9.1.9.

Miscellaneous features

—

Exhaust gas recirculation

| — | Water injection/emulsion |
| --- | --- |

—

Water injection/emulsion

| — | Air injection |
| --- | --- |

—

Air injection

| — | Charge cooling system |
| --- | --- |

—

Charge cooling system

| — | Ignition type (compression, spark) |
| --- | --- |

—

Ignition type (compression, spark)

| 9.1.10. | Exhaust after-treatment






  — | Oxidation catalyst |
| --- | --- | --- |

9.1.10.

Exhaust after-treatment

—

Oxidation catalyst

| — | Reduction catalyst |
| --- | --- |

—

Reduction catalyst

| — | Three way catalyst |
| --- | --- |

—

Three way catalyst

| — | Thermal reactor |
| --- | --- |

—

Thermal reactor

| — | Particulate trap |
| --- | --- |

—

Particulate trap

9.2.   Choice of parent engine

| 9.2.1. | The parent engine of the engine family shall be selected using the primary criterion of the highest fuel delivery per stroke at the declared maximum torque speed in accordance to the essential characteristics of the engine family set out in Appendix 2 of Annex II of Directive 97/68/EC. If two or more engines share this primary criterion, the parent engine shall be selected using the secondary criterion of highest fuel delivery per stroke at rated speed. Under certain circumstances, the approval authority may conclude that the worst case emission rate of the family can best be characterized by testing a second engine. Thus, the approval authority may select an additional engine for tests based on features which indicate that it may have the highest emission levels of the engines within that engine family. |
| --- | --- |

9.2.1.

The parent engine of the engine family shall be selected using the primary criterion of the highest fuel delivery per stroke at the declared maximum torque speed in accordance to the essential characteristics of the engine family set out in Appendix 2 of Annex II of Directive 97/68/EC. If two or more engines share this primary criterion, the parent engine shall be selected using the secondary criterion of highest fuel delivery per stroke at rated speed. Under certain circumstances, the approval authority may conclude that the worst case emission rate of the family can best be characterized by testing a second engine. Thus, the approval authority may select an additional engine for tests based on features which indicate that it may have the highest emission levels of the engines within that engine family.

| 9.2.2. | If engines within the same engine family incorporate other variable features which could be considered to affect emitted pollutants, these features must also be identified and taken into account in the selection of the parent engine. |
| --- | --- |

9.2.2.

If engines within the same engine family incorporate other variable features which could be considered to affect emitted pollutants, these features must also be identified and taken into account in the selection of the parent engine.

Appendix

Marking of engines

1.

| (a) | the trade mark or trade name of the engine's manufacturer; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the trade mark or trade name of the engine's manufacturer;

| (b) | the engine type, and if applicable engine family, and a unique engine identification number; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the engine type, and if applicable engine family, and a unique engine identification number;

| (c) | the EU type-approval mark in accordance with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68(h) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the EU type-approval mark in accordance with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68(h) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

2.

The marks referred to in point 1 must last throughout the useful life of the engine and remain clearly legible and indelible. If labels or plates are used, they must be affixed in such a way that they too last throughout the useful life of the engine, and the labels/plates cannot be removed without destroying or defacing them.

3.

In case of doubt concerning the meeting of this requirement, it shall be considered to have been met if an additional mark containing at least the engine identification number and the name, trade name or logo of the manufacturer has been added. That additional mark shall be affixed to, or next to, a major component that would not normally have to be replaced during the service life of the engine, and be easily accessible, without the assistance of tools, during routine maintenance operations; otherwise, it must be located at a distance from the original mark on the engine crankcase. The original mark and, where appropriate, the additional mark shall both be clearly visible once all of the auxiliaries needed for the operation of the engine have been fitted. A bonnet meeting the requirements set out in the above paragraph shall be authorised. The additional mark shall be affixed in a durable manner preferably directly to the topside of the engine, for example by means of an engraving, or a sticker or plate that meets the requirements of point 2.

4.

The engines must be classified by means of their identification numbers in such a way that the production sequence can be determined unambiguously.

5.

Before leaving the production line, the engines must bear all of the required marks.

6.

The exact location of the engine marks shall be declared in the information document, in accordance with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68 (h) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

7.

In the case of replacement engines, the text ‘REPLACEMENT ENGINE’ shall be attached to a label on the engine in the form of a metallic plate.

---

ANNEX II

Requirements for the EU type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type equipped with an engine type or engine family regarding the pollutants emitted

1.   General

Unless otherwise set out in this Regulation, the definitions, symbols, abbreviations, specifications and tests, specification of conformity of production assessments, parameters defining the engine family, choice of the parent engine as provided for in Annex I to Directive 97/68/EC shall apply.

2.   Application for EU type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type

2.1.   Application for the EU type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type in respect of the pollutants emitted

| 2.1.1. | The application for type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type in terms of the emitted pollutants shall be made by the agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer or his representative. |
| --- | --- |

2.1.1.

The application for type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type in terms of the emitted pollutants shall be made by the agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer or his representative.

| 2.1.2. | It shall be accompanied by the information document, in accordance with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68 (a) to of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013. |
| --- | --- |

2.1.2.

It shall be accompanied by the information document, in accordance with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68 (a) to of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

| 2.1.3. | The manufacturer shall submit an agricultural and forestry vehicle engine conforming to the engine type or parent engine characteristics in accordance with the provisions of Annex I to this Regulation and Annex VII to Directive 97/68/EC to the technical service responsible for conducting the approval tests. |
| --- | --- |

2.1.3.

The manufacturer shall submit an agricultural and forestry vehicle engine conforming to the engine type or parent engine characteristics in accordance with the provisions of Annex I to this Regulation and Annex VII to Directive 97/68/EC to the technical service responsible for conducting the approval tests.

2.2.   Application for EU type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type with an approved engine

| 2.2.1. | The application for type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type in terms of the emitted pollutants shall be made by the agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer or his representative. |
| --- | --- |

2.2.1.

The application for type-approval of an agricultural and forestry vehicle type in terms of the emitted pollutants shall be made by the agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer or his representative.

| 2.2.2. | It shall be accompanied by the information document in accordance with the template set out in the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 68(a) and (l) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and a copy of the EU type-approval certificate for the engine or engine family and, if applicable, for systems, components and separate technical units which are installed in the agricultural and forestry vehicle type. |
| --- | --- |

2.2.2.

It shall be accompanied by the information document in accordance with the template set out in the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 68(a) and (l) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and a copy of the EU type-approval certificate for the engine or engine family and, if applicable, for systems, components and separate technical units which are installed in the agricultural and forestry vehicle type.

3.   Specifications and Tests

3.1.   General

The provisions of Annex I, sections 4, 8 and 9, Appendices 1 and 2, and Annexes III, IV and V to Directive 97/68/EC shall apply.

3.2.   Engine installation on the vehicle

The engine installation on the vehicle shall comply with the following requirements in respect to the type-approval of the engine:

| 3.2.1. | intake depression shall not exceed that specified for the type-approved engine, |
| --- | --- |

3.2.1.

intake depression shall not exceed that specified for the type-approved engine,

| 3.2.2. | exhaust back pressure shall not exceed that specified for the type-approved engine. |
| --- | --- |

3.2.2.

exhaust back pressure shall not exceed that specified for the type-approved engine.

3.3.   Those vehicle components which may affect the emitted pollutants shall be designed, built and assembled in such a way as to meet the technical requirements of this Regulation under the vehicle's normal operating conditions and despite any vibrations to which it could be subjected.

4.   Approval

Any agricultural and forestry vehicle type fitted with an engine for which a certificate of type-approval has been issued in accordance with Annex I to this Regulation or an equivalent type-approval, in accordance with Annex IV to this Regulation, shall be issued with a type-approval certificate in accordance with the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 68(a) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013.

---

ANNEX III

External sound emission requirements

1.   Permissible external sound levels.

1.1.   Measuring Instruments

The instrumentation system, including the microphones, cables and windscreen if used, shall meet the requirements for a Class 1 instrument set out in IEC 61672-1:2002. The filters shall meet the requirements for a Class 1 instrument given in IEC 61260:1995.

1.2.   Conditions of measurement

Measurements shall be made on agricultural and forestry vehicles with their unladen mass in running order in a sufficiently silent and open area (ambient noise and wind noise at least 10 dB (A) below the external sound level being measured).

This area may take the form, for instance, of an open space of 50 metres radius having a central part of at least 20 metres radius which is practically level; it may be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, or similar material and may not be covered with powdery snow, tall grass, loose soil or ashes.

The surface of the test track shall be such as not to cause excessive tyre noise. This condition applies only to measurement of the external sound made by agricultural and forestry vehicles in motion.

Measurement shall be carried out in fine weather with little wind. No person other than the observer taking the readings from the apparatus may remain near the agricultural and forestry vehicle or the microphone, as the presence of spectators near either the agricultural and forestry vehicle or the microphone may considerably affect the readings from the apparatus. Marked fluctuations of the pointer which appear to be unrelated to the characteristics of the general sound level shall be ignored in taking readings.

1.3.   Method of measurement

1.3.1.   Measurement of external sound level of agricultural and forestry vehicles in motion

At least two measurements shall be made on each side of the agricultural and forestry vehicle. Preliminary measurements may be made for adjustment purposes but shall be disregarded.

The microphone shall be situated 1,2 metres above ground level at a distance of 7,5 metres from the path of the agricultural and forestry vehicle's centre line, CC, measured along the perpendicular PP′ to that line (figure 1).

Two lines AA′ and BB′, parallel to line PP′ and situated respectively 10 metres forward and 10 metres rearward of the line, shall be marked out on the test track. Agricultural and forestry vehicles shall approach line AA′ at a steady speed, as specified below. The throttle shall then be fully opened as rapidly as practicable and held in the fully opened position until the rear of the agricultural and forestry vehicles crosses line BB′; the throttle shall then be closed again as rapidly as possible. If the agricultural or forestry vehicle is coupled to a trailer, this shall not be taken into account in determining when line BB′ is crossed.

The maximum sound level recorded shall constitute the result of the measurement.

Figure 1

Image 1

Microphone

Microphone

1.3.1.1.   The test speed shall be three-quarters of the maximum design speed (vmax) as declared by the manufacturer which can be attained in the highest gear used for road movement.

1.3.1.2.   Interpretation of results

| 1.3.1.2.1. | To take account of inaccuracies in the measuring instruments, the result obtained from each measurement shall be determined by deducting 1 dB(A) from the meter reading. |
| --- | --- |

1.3.1.2.1.

To take account of inaccuracies in the measuring instruments, the result obtained from each measurement shall be determined by deducting 1 dB(A) from the meter reading.

| 1.3.1.2.2. | Measurements shall be considered valid if the difference between two consecutive measurements on the same side of the agricultural and forestry vehicle does not exceed 2 dB(A). |
| --- | --- |

1.3.1.2.2.

Measurements shall be considered valid if the difference between two consecutive measurements on the same side of the agricultural and forestry vehicle does not exceed 2 dB(A).

| 1.3.1.2.3. | The highest sound level measured shall constitute the test result. Should that result exceed by 1 dB(A) the maximum permissible sound level for the category of agricultural and forestry vehicle tested, two further measurements shall be made. Three of the four measurements thus obtained must fall within the prescribed limits. |
| --- | --- |

1.3.1.2.3.

The highest sound level measured shall constitute the test result. Should that result exceed by 1 dB(A) the maximum permissible sound level for the category of agricultural and forestry vehicle tested, two further measurements shall be made. Three of the four measurements thus obtained must fall within the prescribed limits.

1.3.2.   Measurement of external sound with agricultural and forestry vehicle stationary

1.3.2.1.   Position of sound-level meter

Measurements shall be made at point X (shown in figure 2) at a distance of 7 metres from the nearest surface of the agricultural and forestry vehicle. The microphone shall be situated 1,2 metres above ground level.

1.3.2.2.   Number of measurements: at least two measurements shall be made.

1.3.2.3.   Agricultural and forestry vehicle test conditions

The engine of an agricultural and forestry vehicle without a speed governor shall be run at three-quarters of the rpm speed at which, in accordance with the agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer, it develops its maximum power. The rpm speed of the engine shall be measured by means of an independent instrument, e.g. a roller bed and a tachometer. If the engine is fitted with a governor preventing the engine from exceeding the speed at which it develops its maximum power, it shall be run at the maximum speed permitted by the governor.

Before taking any measurements, the engine shall be brought to its normal running temperature.

1.3.2.4.   Interpretation of results

All external sound-level readings recorded shall be given in the report. The engine power shall be recorded in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of this Regulation. The state of loading of the agricultural and forestry vehicle must also be given.

The measurements shall be considered valid if the difference between two consecutive measurements on the same side of the agricultural and forestry vehicle does not exceed 2 dB(A).

The maximum figure recorded shall constitute the result of the measurement.

1.3.3.   External sound testing provisions for C-cat vehicles with metallic tracks in motion

For agricultural and forestry vehicles of C category equipped with metallic tracks, the noise in motion shall be measured with vehicles with their unladen mass in running order travelling at a constant speed of 5 km/h (+/– 0,5 km/h), with the engine at rated speed over a layer of humid sand as specified by paragraph 5.3.2 of ISO 6395:2008. The microphone shall be situated in accordance with the provisions of point 1.3.1. The measured noise value shall be recorded in the test report.

2.   Exhaust System (Silencer)

Exhaust System (Silencer)

| 2.1. | If the agricultural and forestry vehicle is fitted with a device designed to reduce the exhaust noise (silencer), the requirements of this section shall apply. If the inlet of the engine is fitted with an air filter which is necessary in order to ensure compliance with the permissible sound level, the filter shall be considered to be part of the silencer, and the requirements of this point 2 shall also apply to that filter.
  The exhaust tailpipe must be positioned in such a way that the exhaust gases cannot penetrate inside the cab.

  Figure 2


  Measuring positions for stationary agricultural and forestry vehicles |
| --- | --- |

2.1.

If the agricultural and forestry vehicle is fitted with a device designed to reduce the exhaust noise (silencer), the requirements of this section shall apply. If the inlet of the engine is fitted with an air filter which is necessary in order to ensure compliance with the permissible sound level, the filter shall be considered to be part of the silencer, and the requirements of this point 2 shall also apply to that filter.

The exhaust tailpipe must be positioned in such a way that the exhaust gases cannot penetrate inside the cab.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Measuring positions for stationary agricultural and forestry vehicles

Measuring positions for stationary agricultural and forestry vehicles

Image 2

| 2.2. | A drawing of the exhaust system must be annexed to the agricultural and forestry vehicle type-approval certificate. |
| --- | --- |

2.2.

A drawing of the exhaust system must be annexed to the agricultural and forestry vehicle type-approval certificate.

| 2.3. | The silencer must be marked with a reference to its make and type which is clearly legible and indelible. |
| --- | --- |

2.3.

The silencer must be marked with a reference to its make and type which is clearly legible and indelible.

| 2.4. | The use of fibrous absorbent material is permitted in the construction of silencers only if the following conditions are fulfilled:






  2.4.1. | the fibrous absorbent material may not be placed in those parts of the silencer through which gases pass; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.4.

The use of fibrous absorbent material is permitted in the construction of silencers only if the following conditions are fulfilled:

2.4.1.

the fibrous absorbent material may not be placed in those parts of the silencer through which gases pass;

| 2.4.2. | suitable devices must ensure that the fibrous absorbent material is kept in place for the whole time that the silencer is being used; |
| --- | --- |

2.4.2.

suitable devices must ensure that the fibrous absorbent material is kept in place for the whole time that the silencer is being used;

| 2.4.3. | the fibrous absorbent material must be resistant to a temperature at least 20 % higher than the operating temperature (degrees C) which may occur in the region of the silencer where those fibrous absorbent materials are situated. |
| --- | --- |

2.4.3.

the fibrous absorbent material must be resistant to a temperature at least 20 % higher than the operating temperature (degrees C) which may occur in the region of the silencer where those fibrous absorbent materials are situated.

---

ANNEX IV

Recognition of alternative type-approvals

The following type-approvals and, where applicable, the approval marks are recognised as being equivalent to an approval under this Regulation:

| (a) | for engine categories H, I, J and K (stage IIIA) specified in Article 9(3a) and (3b) of Directive 97/68/EC, type-approvals in accordance with points 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of Annex XII to Directive 97/68/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

for engine categories H, I, J and K (stage IIIA) specified in Article 9(3a) and (3b) of Directive 97/68/EC, type-approvals in accordance with points 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of Annex XII to Directive 97/68/EC;

| (b) | for engine categories L, M, N and P (stage IIIB) specified in Article 9(3c) of Directive 97/68/EC, type-approvals in accordance with points 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 of Annex XII to Directive 97/68/EC; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

for engine categories L, M, N and P (stage IIIB) specified in Article 9(3c) of Directive 97/68/EC, type-approvals in accordance with points 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 of Annex XII to Directive 97/68/EC;

| (c) | for engine categories Q and R (stage IV) specified in Article 9(3d) of Directive 97/68/EC, type-approvals in accordance with points 5.1 and 5.2 of Annex XII to Directive 97/68/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

for engine categories Q and R (stage IV) specified in Article 9(3d) of Directive 97/68/EC, type-approvals in accordance with points 5.1 and 5.2 of Annex XII to Directive 97/68/EC.

---

ANNEX V

Provisions for agricultural and forestry vehicles and engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme established under Article 14

1.   Actions by the agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer.

1.1.   Except during Stage III B, an agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer who wishes to make use of the flexibility scheme shall request permission from the approval authority to place agricultural and forestry vehicles on the market in accordance with the relevant provisions set out in this Annex. The number of agricultural and forestry vehicles shall not exceed the ceilings set out in points 1.1.1 and 1.1.2. The engines shall meet the requirements referred to in Article 9 to Directive 97/68/EC.

1.1.1.   The number of agricultural and forestry vehicles placed on the market under the flexibility scheme shall, in each engine category, not exceed 20 % of the annual number of vehicles placed on the market by the manufacturer with engines in that engine power range (calculated as the average of the last five years' sales on the Union market). Where a vehicle manufacturer has placed on the market agricultural and forestry vehicles in the Union for a period of less than five years the average will be calculated based on the actual period for which the vehicle manufacturer has placed on the market agricultural and forestry vehicles in the Union.

1.1.2.   As an alternative to point 1.1.1, the number of agricultural and forestry vehicles placed on the market under the flexibility scheme shall, in each power range, not exceed the following ceilings:

| Engine power range P (kW) | Number of vehicles |
| --- | --- |
| 19 ≤ P < 37 | 200 |
| 37 ≤ P < 75 | 150 |
| 75 ≤ P < 130 | 100 |
| 130 ≤ P ≤ 560 | 50 |

Engine power range P (kW)

Number of vehicles

19 ≤ P < 37

200

37 ≤ P < 75

150

75 ≤ P < 130

100

130 ≤ P ≤ 560

50

1.2.   During Stage III B, a vehicle manufacturer who wishes to make use of the flexibility scheme shall request permission from the approval authority to place agricultural and forestry vehicles on the market in accordance with the relevant provisions set out in this Annex. The number of agricultural and forestry vehicles shall not exceed the ceilings set out in points 1.2.1 and 1.2.2. The engines shall meet the requirements referred to in Article 9 to Directive 97/68/EC.

1.2.1.   The number of agricultural and forestry vehicles placed on the market under the flexibility scheme shall, in each engine power range, not exceed 40 % of the annual number of agricultural and forestry vehicles placed on the market by the vehicle manufacturer with engines in that engine category (calculated as the average of the last five years' sales on the Union market). Where a vehicle manufacturer has marketed agricultural and forestry vehicles in the Union for a period of less than five years the average will be calculated based on the actual period for which the vehicle manufacturer has marketed agricultural and forestry vehicles in the Union.

1.2.2.   As an alternative to point 1.2.1, the number of agricultural and forestry vehicles placed on the market under the flexibility scheme shall, in each power range, not exceed the following ceilings:

| Engine power range P (kW) | Number of vehicles |
| --- | --- |
| 19 ≤ P < 37 | 200 |
| 37 ≤ P < 75 | 175 |
| 75 ≤ P < 130 | 250 |
| 130 ≤ P ≤ 560 | 125 |

Engine power range P (kW)

Number of vehicles

19 ≤ P < 37

200

37 ≤ P < 75

175

75 ≤ P < 130

250

130 ≤ P ≤ 560

125

1.3.   The vehicle manufacturer shall include in his application to the approval authority all the following information:

| (a) | A sample of the labels to be affixed to each agricultural and forestry vehicle in which an engine placed on the market under the flexibility scheme will be installed. The labels shall bear the following text: ‘AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY VEHICLE NO ... (sequence of vehicles) OF ... (total number of vehicles in respective power range) WITH ENGINE NO ... WITH TYPE-APPROVAL (e.g. in accordance with the provisions of Directive 97/68/EC or recognized alternative type-approval in accordance with Annex IV to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/96)’; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

A sample of the labels to be affixed to each agricultural and forestry vehicle in which an engine placed on the market under the flexibility scheme will be installed. The labels shall bear the following text: ‘AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY VEHICLE NO ... (sequence of vehicles) OF ... (total number of vehicles in respective power range) WITH ENGINE NO ... WITH TYPE-APPROVAL (e.g. in accordance with the provisions of Directive 97/68/EC or recognized alternative type-approval in accordance with Annex IV to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/96)’;

| (b) | A sample of the supplementary label to be affixed on the engine bearing the text referred to in point 2.2. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

A sample of the supplementary label to be affixed on the engine bearing the text referred to in point 2.2.

1.4.   The agricultural and forestry vehicles manufacturer shall provide the approval authority with any necessary information connected with the implementation of the flexibility scheme that the approval authority may request in order to make a decision.

1.5.   The vehicle manufacturer shall file a report every 12 months to the approval authorities of each Member State where the agricultural and forestry vehicles is placed on the market on the implementation of the flexibility schemes he is using. The report shall include cumulative data on the number of agricultural and forestry vehicles placed on the market under the flexibility scheme, engine and vehicle serial numbers, and the Member States where the vehicle has been entered into service. This procedure shall be continued as long as a flexibility scheme is still in progress, without any exceptions.

2.   Actions by the engine manufacturer

2.1.   An engine manufacturer may place on the market engines under the flexibility scheme approved in accordance with sections 1 and 3.

2.2.   The engine manufacturer shall label those engines with the following text: ‘Engine placed on the market under the flexibility scheme’ in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex XIII of Directive 97/68/EC.

3.   Actions by the approval authority

The approval authority shall evaluate the content of the flexibility scheme request and the enclosed documents. It will inform the agricultural and forestry vehicle manufacturer of its decision as to whether or not to allow use of the flexibility scheme as requested.

---

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/22

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2015/97

of 17 October 2014

correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 as regards the notification of significant net short positions in sovereign debt

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps (1), and in particular Article 3(7) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 13 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 (2) specifies, according to the empowerment provided in Article 3(7)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012, the method of calculating positions for legal entities within a group that have long or short positions in relation to a particular issuer. Article 13 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 provides the method of calculating positions both for issued share capital and issued sovereign debt. However, Article 13(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 currently only refers to the notification threshold of Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012, on significant net short positions in shares, while it should also refer to the notification threshold of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 on significant net short positions in sovereign debt. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 13 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 (2) specifies, according to the empowerment provided in Article 3(7)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012, the method of calculating positions for legal entities within a group that have long or short positions in relation to a particular issuer. Article 13 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 provides the method of calculating positions both for issued share capital and issued sovereign debt. However, Article 13(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 currently only refers to the notification threshold of Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012, on significant net short positions in shares, while it should also refer to the notification threshold of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 on significant net short positions in sovereign debt.

| (2) | To avoid legal uncertainty, Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 should therefore be corrected accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To avoid legal uncertainty, Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 should therefore be corrected accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 13(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

‘3.   When a net short position reaches or crosses the notification threshold in accordance with Articles 5 and 7 or the disclosure threshold in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012, a legal entity within the group shall report and disclose in accordance with Articles 5 to 11 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 the net short position in a particular issuer calculated according to paragraph 1 provided that no net short position at group level calculated according to paragraph 2 reaches or crosses a notification or disclosure threshold.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 October 2014.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 86, 24.3.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 918/2012 of 5 July 2012 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps with regard to definitions, the calculation of net short positions, covered sovereign credit default swaps, notification thresholds, liquidity thresholds for suspending restrictions, significant falls in the value of financial instruments and adverse events (OJ L 274, 9.10.2012, p. 1).

2

---

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/23

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2015/98

of 18 November 2014

on the implementation of the Union's international obligations, as referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, under the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas and the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC (1), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 provides for the landing of all catches of species which are subject to catch limits and, in the Mediterranean, also catches of certain species which are subject to minimum sizes (‘the landing obligation’). Article 15(1) of that Regulation covers fishing activities in Union waters or by Union fishing vessels outside Union waters in waters not subject to third countries' sovereignty or jurisdiction. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 provides for the landing of all catches of species which are subject to catch limits and, in the Mediterranean, also catches of certain species which are subject to minimum sizes (‘the landing obligation’). Article 15(1) of that Regulation covers fishing activities in Union waters or by Union fishing vessels outside Union waters in waters not subject to third countries' sovereignty or jurisdiction.

| (2) | The landing obligation will apply from 1 January 2015 at the latest to the small and large pelagic fisheries, fisheries for industrial purposes and fisheries for salmon in the Baltic sea. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The landing obligation will apply from 1 January 2015 at the latest to the small and large pelagic fisheries, fisheries for industrial purposes and fisheries for salmon in the Baltic sea.

| (3) | The Union is a contracting party to a number of regional fisheries management organisations (‘RFMOs’) and is, therefore, bound by measures established by the RFMOs concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Union is a contracting party to a number of regional fisheries management organisations (‘RFMOs’) and is, therefore, bound by measures established by the RFMOs concerned.

| (4) | Certain RFMO measures provide for fishing vessels fishing in their purview to discard certain catches which in principle fall under the landing obligation. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Certain RFMO measures provide for fishing vessels fishing in their purview to discard certain catches which in principle fall under the landing obligation.

| (5) | Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts for the purpose of implementing international obligations into Union law, including, in particular, derogations from the landing obligation. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts for the purpose of implementing international obligations into Union law, including, in particular, derogations from the landing obligation.

| (6) | It is therefore necessary to clarify the situations in which the landing obligation does not apply, in order to ensure compliance by the Union with its international obligations and create legal certainty for fishermen. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

It is therefore necessary to clarify the situations in which the landing obligation does not apply, in order to ensure compliance by the Union with its international obligations and create legal certainty for fishermen.

| (7) | In accordance with Recommendation 11-01 of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (‘ICCAT’) on a multiannual conservation and management programme for bigeye and yellowfin tunas, certain fishing vessels should not be allowed to fish, retain on board, tranship, transport, transfer, process or land bigeye tunas in the Atlantic. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In accordance with Recommendation 11-01 of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (‘ICCAT’) on a multiannual conservation and management programme for bigeye and yellowfin tunas, certain fishing vessels should not be allowed to fish, retain on board, tranship, transport, transfer, process or land bigeye tunas in the Atlantic.

| (8) | ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 establishes a discard obligation for vessels and traps catching Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna in certain situations. In particular, paragraph 29 of that Recommendation states that bluefin tuna below a minimum reference weight or size is to be discarded. That minimum size is currently laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 (2). That discard obligation applies to all Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna fisheries, including recreational and sports fisheries. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 establishes a discard obligation for vessels and traps catching Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna in certain situations. In particular, paragraph 29 of that Recommendation states that bluefin tuna below a minimum reference weight or size is to be discarded. That minimum size is currently laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 (2). That discard obligation applies to all Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna fisheries, including recreational and sports fisheries.

| (9) | Furthermore, paragraph 31 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 establishes a discard obligation for bluefin tuna weighing between 8 and 30 kg or with fork length between 75 and 115 cm, caught as incidental catch by vessels and traps actively fishing for this species and exceeding 5 % of the total bluefin tuna catches. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Furthermore, paragraph 31 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 establishes a discard obligation for bluefin tuna weighing between 8 and 30 kg or with fork length between 75 and 115 cm, caught as incidental catch by vessels and traps actively fishing for this species and exceeding 5 % of the total bluefin tuna catches.

| (10) | The weight category for the incidental catch of bluefin tuna established by Article 9(12) of Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 is different from that established by paragraph 31 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07, which was adopted after the entry into force of that Regulation. Pending the review of Regulation (EC) No 302/2009, paragraph 31 of that ICCAT Recommendation should be implemented in Union law by this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The weight category for the incidental catch of bluefin tuna established by Article 9(12) of Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 is different from that established by paragraph 31 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07, which was adopted after the entry into force of that Regulation. Pending the review of Regulation (EC) No 302/2009, paragraph 31 of that ICCAT Recommendation should be implemented in Union law by this Regulation.

| (11) | Paragraph 32 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 states that vessels not fishing actively for bluefin tuna are not authorised to retain bluefin tuna above 5 % of their total catch by weight or number of pieces. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Paragraph 32 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 states that vessels not fishing actively for bluefin tuna are not authorised to retain bluefin tuna above 5 % of their total catch by weight or number of pieces.

| (12) | Paragraphs 34 and 41 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 establish a release obligation for bluefin tuna caught alive in the framework of recreational and sport fisheries. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Paragraphs 34 and 41 of ICCAT Recommendation 13-07 establish a release obligation for bluefin tuna caught alive in the framework of recreational and sport fisheries.

| (13) | ICCAT Recommendation 13-02 for the conservation of North Atlantic swordfish establishes a discard obligation for vessels fishing for North Atlantic swordfish in certain situations. In particular, paragraph 9 states that swordfish below a minimum reference weight or size should be discarded. That minimum size is currently fixed in Council Regulation (EC) No 520/2007 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(13)

ICCAT Recommendation 13-02 for the conservation of North Atlantic swordfish establishes a discard obligation for vessels fishing for North Atlantic swordfish in certain situations. In particular, paragraph 9 states that swordfish below a minimum reference weight or size should be discarded. That minimum size is currently fixed in Council Regulation (EC) No 520/2007 (3).

| (14) | Furthermore, the same paragraph of Recommendation 13-02 establishes a discard obligation for swordfish weighing less than 25 kg live weight or 125 cm lower jaw fork length, caught as incidental catch and exceeding 15 % of the number of swordfish of the vessel's total swordfish catch per landing. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Furthermore, the same paragraph of Recommendation 13-02 establishes a discard obligation for swordfish weighing less than 25 kg live weight or 125 cm lower jaw fork length, caught as incidental catch and exceeding 15 % of the number of swordfish of the vessel's total swordfish catch per landing.

| (15) | In order to ensure consistency between ICCAT recommendations 11-01, 13-07 and 13-02 and Union law, the landing obligation should not apply to Union vessels participating in the fisheries covered by those recommendations. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

In order to ensure consistency between ICCAT recommendations 11-01, 13-07 and 13-02 and Union law, the landing obligation should not apply to Union vessels participating in the fisheries covered by those recommendations.

| (16) | Article 5, Article 6.3 and Annex I.A of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (‘NAFO’) conservation and enforcement measures establish a discard obligation for any catch of capelin above established quota or above the allowed by-catch percentage. Annex I.A currently establishes a total allowable catch (‘TAC’) of zero for capelin. In addition, capelin by-catch in other fisheries that fall under the landing obligation is, under certain conditions, also subject to a discard obligation in accordance with NAFO rules. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Article 5, Article 6.3 and Annex I.A of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (‘NAFO’) conservation and enforcement measures establish a discard obligation for any catch of capelin above established quota or above the allowed by-catch percentage. Annex I.A currently establishes a total allowable catch (‘TAC’) of zero for capelin. In addition, capelin by-catch in other fisheries that fall under the landing obligation is, under certain conditions, also subject to a discard obligation in accordance with NAFO rules.

| (17) | In order to ensure consistency between NAFO conservation and enforcement measures and Union law, the landing obligation should not apply to the fisheries covered by those measures. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

In order to ensure consistency between NAFO conservation and enforcement measures and Union law, the landing obligation should not apply to the fisheries covered by those measures.

| (18) | In view of the time-frame laid down in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, this Regulation should enter into force immediately after the publication, |
| --- | --- |

(18)

In view of the time-frame laid down in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, this Regulation should enter into force immediately after the publication,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

CHAPTER I

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 1

Subject matter and scope

This Regulation establishes derogations from the landing obligation set out in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the purpose of implementing Union's international obligations under the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas and the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. It applies to fishing activities in Union waters or by Union fishing vessels outside Union waters in waters not subject to third countries' sovereignty or jurisdiction.

Article 2

Definitions

For the purpose of this Regulation the following definitions shall apply:

| (1) | ‘NAFO Convention area’ means the geographical areas specified in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 217/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4); |
| --- | --- |

(1)

‘NAFO Convention area’ means the geographical areas specified in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 217/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4);

4

| (2) | ‘Fisheries under the purview of NAFO’ means the fisheries in the NAFO Convention area concerning all fishery resources, with the following exceptions: salmon, tunas and marlins, cetacean stocks managed by the International Whaling Commission or any successor organisation, and sedentary species of the Continental Shelf, i.e., organisms which, at the harvestable stage, either are immobile on or under the seabed or are unable to move except in constant physical contact with the seabed or the subsoil; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

‘Fisheries under the purview of NAFO’ means the fisheries in the NAFO Convention area concerning all fishery resources, with the following exceptions: salmon, tunas and marlins, cetacean stocks managed by the International Whaling Commission or any successor organisation, and sedentary species of the Continental Shelf, i.e., organisms which, at the harvestable stage, either are immobile on or under the seabed or are unable to move except in constant physical contact with the seabed or the subsoil;

| (3) | ‘North Atlantic Ocean’ means the area of the Atlantic Ocean north of 5° N; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

‘North Atlantic Ocean’ means the area of the Atlantic Ocean north of 5° N;

| (4) | ‘Recreational fisheries’ means a non-commercial fishery whose participants do not adhere to a national sport organisation or are not issued with a national sport licence; |
| --- | --- |

(4)

‘Recreational fisheries’ means a non-commercial fishery whose participants do not adhere to a national sport organisation or are not issued with a national sport licence;

| (5) | ‘Sport fishery’ means a non-commercial fishery whose participants adhere to a national sport organisation or are issued with a national sport licence. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

‘Sport fishery’ means a non-commercial fishery whose participants adhere to a national sport organisation or are issued with a national sport licence.

CHAPTER II

ICCAT CONVENTION AREA

Article 3

Bigeye tuna

1.   This Article shall apply to bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Atlantic Ocean.

2.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, fishing vessels 20 metres length overall or greater not entered into the ICCAT record of authorised bigeye tuna vessels shall not target, retain on board, tranship, transport, transfer, process or land bigeye tuna in the Atlantic Ocean.

Article 4

Bluefin tuna

1.   This Article shall apply to bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) in the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean.

2.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, it shall be prohibited to target, retain on board, tranship, transfer, land, transport, store, sell, display or offer for sale bluefin tuna below minimum size set out in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 302/2009.

3.   By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article and from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, incidental catches of maximum 5 % of bluefin tuna between 8 kg or 75 cm and minimum size set out in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 in kg or cm by catching vessels and traps fishing actively for bluefin tuna may be retained on board, transhipped, transferred, landed, transported, stored, sold, displayed or offered for sale.

4.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, the catching vessels and traps fishing actively for bluefin tuna shall not retain bluefin tuna weighing between 8 and 30kg or with a fork length between 75 and 115 cm exceeding 5 % of bluefin tuna.

5.   The percentage of 5 % referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be calculated on the basis of the total incidental catches of bluefin tuna in number of fish of the total catches of bluefin tuna retained on board the vessel at any time after each fishing operation.

6.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, catching vessels not fishing actively for bluefin tuna shall not retain on board bluefin tuna exceeding 5 % of the total catch on board by weight or number of pieces. The calculation based on the number of pieces shall only apply to tuna and tuna-like species managed by ICCAT.

7.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, if the quota allocated to the Member State of the fishing vessel or trap concerned has already been consumed:

| (a) | by-catches of bluefin tuna shall be avoided; and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

by-catches of bluefin tuna shall be avoided; and

| (b) | the bluefin tuna caught alive as by-catch shall be released. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the bluefin tuna caught alive as by-catch shall be released.

8.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, bluefin tuna caught alive in the framework of recreational fisheries shall be released.

9.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, bluefin tuna caught alive in the framework of sport fishing shall be released.

Article 5

Swordfish

1.   This Article shall apply to swordfish (Xiphias gladius) in the North Atlantic Ocean.

2.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, it shall be prohibited to target, retain on board or tranship, land, transport, store, display or offer for sale, sell or market swordfish below the minimum size, as set out in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 520/2007.

3.   By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article and from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, incidental catches of maximum 15 % of swordfish weighing less than 25 kg live weight or 125 cm lower jaw fork length may be retained on board, transhipped, transferred, landed, transported, stored, sold, displayed or offered for sale.

4.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, vessels shall not retain swordfish weighing less than 25 kg live weight or 125 cm lower jaw fork length exceeding 15 % of swordfish.

5.   The percentage of 15 % referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be calculated on the basis of the number of swordfish of the vessel's total swordfish catch per landing.

CHAPTER III

NAFO CONVENTION AREA

Article 6

Capelin

1.   This Article shall apply to capelin (Mallotus villosus) in the NAFO convention area.

2.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, capelin caught above established quota allocated by Union legislation shall not be retained on board.

3.   By way of derogation from Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, capelin caught as by-catch in a fishery falling under the landing obligation under the purview of NAFO shall not be retained on board.

CHAPTER IV

FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 7

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 November 2014

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 22.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 of 6 April 2009 concerning a multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean, amending Regulation (EC) No 43/2009 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1559/2007 (OJ L 96, 15.4.2009, p. 6).

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EC) No 520/2007 of 7 May 2007 laying down technical measures for the conservation of certain stocks of highly migratory species and repealing Regulation (EC) No 973/2001 (OJ L 123, 12.5.2007, p. 3).

3

(4)  Regulation (EC) No 217/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on the submission of catch and activity statistics by Member States fishing in the north-west Atlantic (OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 42).

4

---

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/27

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/99

of 20 January 2015

approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Arroz de Valencia’/‘Arròs de València’ (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Arroz de Valencia’/‘Arròs de València’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1971/2001 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Arroz de Valencia’/‘Arròs de València’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1971/2001 (2).

| (2) | Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

| (3) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Arroz de Valencia’/‘Arròs de València’ (PDO) are hereby approved.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1971/2001 of 9 October 2001 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 on the entry of certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 269, 10.10.2001, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ C 277, 22.8.2014, p. 6.

3

---

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/28

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/100

of 20 January 2015

approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Halberstädter Würstchen (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Germany's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Halberstädter Würstchen’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2010 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Germany's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Halberstädter Würstchen’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2010 (2).

| (2) | Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

| (3) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Halberstädter Würstchen’ (PGI) are hereby approved.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2010 of 8 October 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Halberstädter Würstchen (PGI)) (OJ L 266, 9.10.2010, p. 42).

2

(3)  
  OJ C 270, 19.8.2014, p. 4.

3

---

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/29

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/101

of 22 January 2015

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

| (2) | The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2015.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | EG | 330,7 |
| IL | 160,5 |
| MA | 120,7 |
| TR | 158,4 |
| ZZ | 192,6 |
| 0707 00 05 | JO | 241,9 |
| MA | 66,8 |
| TR | 175,6 |
| ZZ | 161,4 |
| 0709 93 10 | MA | 231,2 |
| TR | 184,3 |
| ZZ | 207,8 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 47,3 |
| MA | 63,2 |
| TN | 65,2 |
| TR | 64,2 |
| ZZ | 60,0 |
| 0805 20 10 | IL | 146,9 |
| MA | 87,9 |
| ZZ | 117,4 |
| 0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90 | EG | 87,6 |
| IL | 126,1 |
| JM | 118,0 |
| MA | 125,5 |
| TR | 115,4 |
| ZZ | 114,5 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 60,9 |
| ZZ | 60,9 |
| 0808 10 80 | BR | 63,3 |
| CL | 89,7 |
| MK | 24,4 |
| US | 170,2 |
| ZZ | 86,9 |
| 0808 30 90 | CL | 265,9 |
| US | 138,7 |
| ZZ | 202,3 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

EG

330,7

IL

160,5

MA

120,7

TR

158,4

ZZ

192,6

0707 00 05

JO

241,9

MA

66,8

TR

175,6

ZZ

161,4

0709 93 10

MA

231,2

TR

184,3

ZZ

207,8

0805 10 20

EG

47,3

MA

63,2

TN

65,2

TR

64,2

ZZ

60,0

0805 20 10

IL

146,9

MA

87,9

ZZ

117,4

0805 20 30 , 0805 20 50 , 0805 20 70 , 0805 20 90

EG

87,6

IL

126,1

JM

118,0

MA

125,5

TR

115,4

ZZ

114,5

0805 50 10

TR

60,9

ZZ

60,9

0808 10 80

BR

63,3

CL

89,7

MK

24,4

US

170,2

ZZ

86,9

0808 30 90

CL

265,9

US

138,7

ZZ

202,3

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1106/2012 of 27 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries, as regards the update of the nomenclature of countries and territories (OJ L 328, 28.11.2012, p. 7). Code ‘ZZ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/31

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/102

of 20 January 2015

on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/4/2014 (ATALANTA/1/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP of 10 November 2008 on a European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’), to take decisions on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (‘EU Force Commander’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’), to take decisions on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (‘EU Force Commander’).

| (2) | On 24 July 2014, the PSC adopted Decision Atalanta/4/2014 (2) appointing Rear Admiral Guido RANDO as EU Force Commander. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 24 July 2014, the PSC adopted Decision Atalanta/4/2014 (2) appointing Rear Admiral Guido RANDO as EU Force Commander.

| (3) | The EU Operation Commander has recommended the appointment of Rear Admiral Jonas HAGGREN as the new EU Force Commander to succeed Rear Admiral Guido RANDO. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The EU Operation Commander has recommended the appointment of Rear Admiral Jonas HAGGREN as the new EU Force Commander to succeed Rear Admiral Guido RANDO.

| (4) | The EU Military Committee supports that recommendation. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The EU Military Committee supports that recommendation.

| (5) | Decision Atalanta/4/2014 should therefore be repealed. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Decision Atalanta/4/2014 should therefore be repealed.

| (6) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(6)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Rear Admiral Jonas HAGGREN is hereby appointed EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) as from 13 February 2015.

Article 2

Decision Atalanta/4/2014 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 13 February 2015.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 301, 12.11.2008, p. 33.

1

(2)  Political and Security Committee Decision Atalanta/4/2014 of 24 July 2014 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/1/2014 (OJ L 222, 26.7.2014, p. 14).

2

---

DECISIONS

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/33

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2015/103

of 16 January 2015

excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)

(notified under document C(2015) 53)

(Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Dutch, English, Estonian, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Romanian and Spanish, texts are authentic)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (1), and in particular Article 52 thereof,

After consulting the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 (2) and as from 1 January 2015 in accordance with Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of those verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 (2) and as from 1 January 2015 in accordance with Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of those verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.

| (2) | The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission.

| (3) | In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Union law may be financed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Union law may be financed.

| (4) | In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGF and the EAFRD. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGF and the EAFRD.

| (5) | The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission's written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission's written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States.

| (6) | As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Union law was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Union law was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.

| (7) | This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases pending on 1 September 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases pending on 1 September 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The amounts set out in the Annex and related to expenditure incurred by the Member States' accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGF or the EAFRD shall be excluded from Union financing.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Lithuania, Hungary, the Kingdom of Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, Romania, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 16 January 2015.

For the Commission

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1).

2

---

ANNEX

Budget Item: 05070107

| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GB | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2012 | Exceeding of financial ceiling | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 63 830,47 | – 63 830,47 | 0,00 |
| | Financial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines | 2012 | Late payments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 273 941,77 | – 514 631,58 | 240 689,81 |
| | | | | | Total GB: | EUR | – 337 772,24 | – 578 462,05 | 240 689,81 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| NL | Starch | 2003 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 5 295 327,28 | 0,00 | 5 295 327,28 |
| | Starch | 2004 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 5 424 788,14 | 0,00 | 5 424 788,14 |
| | Starch | 2005 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 5 871 686,22 | 0,00 | 5 871 686,22 |
| | Starch | 2006 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 5 973 168,71 | 0,00 | 5 973 168,71 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Potato Starch | 2007 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 2 103 632,94 | 0,00 | 2 103 632,94 |
| | Starch (2007+) | 2007 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 955 503,06 | 0,00 | 955 503,06 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Potato Starch | 2008 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 2 431 551,73 | 0,00 | 2 431 551,73 |
| | Starch (2007+) | 2008 | reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 891 491,23 | 0,00 | 891 491,23 |
| | | | | | Total NL: | EUR | 28 947 149,31 | 0,00 | 28 947 149,31 |

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

GB

Financial audit — Overshooting

2012

Exceeding of financial ceiling

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 63 830,47

– 63 830,47

0,00

Financial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines

2012

Late payments

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 273 941,77

– 514 631,58

240 689,81

Total GB:

EUR

– 337 772,24

– 578 462,05

240 689,81

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

NL

Starch

2003

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

5 295 327,28

0,00

5 295 327,28

Starch

2004

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

5 424 788,14

0,00

5 424 788,14

Starch

2005

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

5 871 686,22

0,00

5 871 686,22

Starch

2006

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

5 973 168,71

0,00

5 973 168,71

Other Direct Aid — Potato Starch

2007

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

2 103 632,94

0,00

2 103 632,94

Starch (2007+)

2007

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

955 503,06

0,00

955 503,06

Other Direct Aid — Potato Starch

2008

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

2 431 551,73

0,00

2 431 551,73

Starch (2007+)

2008

reimbursement following the judgement of Court of Justice in case T-16/11

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

891 491,23

0,00

891 491,23

Total NL:

EUR

28 947 149,31

0,00

28 947 149,31

Totals by Budget Item: 05070107

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | 28 609 377,07 | – 578 462,05 | 29 187 839,12 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

28 609 377,07

– 578 462,05

29 187 839,12

Budget Item: 6701

| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AT | Entitlements | 2011 | Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 276 374,35 | 0,00 | – 276 374,35 |
| | Entitlements | 2012 | Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 293 850,15 | 0,00 | – 293 850,15 |
| | Entitlements | 2013 | Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 301 013,79 | 0,00 | – 301 013,79 |
| AT | Cross Compliance | 2012 | Deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2011 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 76 849,71 | 0,00 | – 76 849,71 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 13 484,40 | 0,00 | – 13 484,40 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 14 441,58 | 0,00 | – 14 441,58 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2012 | GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2011 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 14 393,70 | 0,00 | – 14 393,70 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 5,14 | 0,00 | – 5,14 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 246,74 | 0,00 | – 246,74 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2012 | No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 755,78 | 0,00 | – 755,78 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weakness in cross-reporting, deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 47 399,01 | 0,00 | – 47 399,01 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weakness in cross-reporting, deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2010 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 91 372,17 | 0,00 | – 91 372,17 |
| | | | | | Total AT: | EUR | – 1 130 186,52 | 0,00 | – 1 130 186,52 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 3 389,17 | 0,00 | – 3 389,17 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 856,51 | 0,00 | – 1 856,51 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 89,72 | 0,00 | – 89,72 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 527 302,79 | 0,00 | – 527 302,79 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 568,84 | 0,00 | – 568,84 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 20,77 | 0,00 | – 20,77 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 538 273,49 | 0,00 | – 538 273,49 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 94,12 | 0,00 | – 94,12 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 535 293,19 | – 794,71 | – 534 498,48 |
| | | | | | Total BE: | EUR | – 1 606 888,60 | – 794,71 | – 1 606 093,89 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| BG | Wine — Restructuring | 2010 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 16 046,31 | 0,00 | – 16 046,31 |
| | Wine — Restructuring | 2011 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 27 397,90 | 0,00 | – 27 397,90 |
| | Wine — Restructuring | 2012 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 97 089,53 | 0,00 | – 97 089,53 |
| | Wine — Restructuring | 2013 | ineligible restructuring measure | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 33 338,19 | 0,00 | – 33 338,19 |
| BG | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2011 | Non-application of regulatory exclusions | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 370 455,39 | – 18 522,77 | – 351 932,62 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2012 | Non-application of regulatory exclusions | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 381 206,05 | – 19 060,30 | – 362 145,75 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2013 | Non-application of regulatory exclusions | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 248 886,64 | – 12 444,33 | – 236 442,31 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2011 | Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 521 954,26 | 0,00 | – 521 954,26 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2012 | Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 808 560,83 | 0,00 | – 808 560,83 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2013 | Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 995 079,95 | 0,00 | – 995 079,95 |
| BG | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 13 598 952,95 | 0,00 | – 13 598 952,95 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 77 724,05 | 0,00 | – 77 724,05 |
| BG | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 14 660 582,12 | 0,00 | – 14 660 582,12 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 7 964,58 | 0,00 | – 7 964,58 |
| | | | | | Total BG: | EUR | – 31 845 238,75 | – 50 027,40 | – 31 795 211,35 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| CZ | Wine — Restructuring | 2010 | non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 690 350,42 | 0,00 | – 690 350,42 |
| | Wine — Restructuring | 2011 | non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 865 307,63 | 0,00 | – 865 307,63 |
| | Wine — Restructuring | 2012 | non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 567 540,99 | 0,00 | – 567 540,99 |
| | | | | | Total CZ: | EUR | – 2 123 199,04 | 0,00 | – 2 123 199,04 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| DE | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2010 | ineligible expenditures for construction of a storage facility | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 430 654,77 | 0,00 | – 430 654,77 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2009 | Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 77 966,78 | 0,00 | – 77 966,78 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2010 | Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 153 735,28 | 0,00 | – 153 735,28 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2011 | Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 70 057,05 | 0,00 | – 70 057,05 |
| DE | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 190 178,10 | – 379,60 | – 189 798,50 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 150 339,66 | – 300,08 | – 150 039,58 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2010 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 158 485,49 | – 316,34 | – 158 169,15 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3 929 816,78 | – 126,22 | – 3 929 690,56 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3 573 164,56 | 0,00 | – 3 573 164,56 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3 463 572,31 | 0,00 | – 3 463 572,31 |
| | | | | | Total DE: | EUR | – 12 197 970,78 | – 1 122,24 | – 12 196 848,54 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| EE | Cross Compliance | 2010 | 1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 123 269,50 | 0,00 | – 123 269,50 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | 1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1,71 | 0,00 | – 1,71 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2012 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of one SMR4 requirements, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 163 434,31 | 0,00 | – 163 434,31 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 143 245,25 | 0,00 | – 143 245,25 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2012 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3,33 | 0,00 | – 3,33 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | No control of SMR6, non-application of sanctions for the late notifications and modification of sanctions, CY2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 22 887,71 | – 45,78 | – 22 841,93 |
| | | | | | Total EE: | EUR | – 452 841,81 | – 45,78 | – 452 796,03 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| ES | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Ineffectiveness of risk analysis | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 3 586 250,48 | 0,00 | – 3 586 250,48 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Ineffectiveness of risk analysis | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 1 866 977,31 | 0,00 | – 1 866 977,31 |
| ES | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 389 865,14 | – 1 949,33 | – 387 915,81 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 201 023,75 | – 1 005,12 | – 200 018,63 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 25,00 % | EUR | – 9 290 513,97 | – 46 452,57 | – 9 244 061,40 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 445 642,75 | – 2 228,22 | – 443 414,53 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 283 917,17 | – 1 419,59 | – 282 497,58 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 25,00 % | EUR | – 10 345 263,99 | – 51 726,32 | – 10 293 537,67 |
| ES | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2007 | Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2006 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 20 976,39 | 0,00 | – 20 976,39 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2007 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 1 994,65 | 0,00 | – 1 994,65 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 294 932,52 | 0,00 | – 294 932,52 |
| ES | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Leniency of the sanctioning system, CY 2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 580 604,92 | – 479,70 | – 580 125,22 |
| ES | Clearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance | 2011 | material error | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 18 603,55 | 0,00 | – 18 603,55 |
| | | | | | Total ES: | EUR | – 27 326 566,59 | – 105 260,85 | – 27 221 305,74 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| FR | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Correction due to partial restructuring instead of full restructuring | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 69 980 526,56 | 0,00 | – 69 980 526,56 |
| | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Correction due to quota reduction instead of full restructuring | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 8 734 375,00 | 0,00 | – 8 734 375,00 |
| | Export refunds — Live animals | 2010 | procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 94 156,69 | 0,00 | – 94 156,69 |
| | Export refunds — Live animals | 2011 | procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 120 146,09 | 0,00 | – 120 146,09 |
| | Export refunds —Live animals | 2012 | procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 33 062,27 | 0,00 | – 33 062,27 |
| FR | Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2008 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 39 685 694,63 | – 198 428,46 | – 39 487 266,17 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2009 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 41 704 273,69 | – 208 521,38 | – 41 495 752,31 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2010 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 41 590 433,76 | – 83 423,53 | – 41 507 010,23 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2011 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 300 981,50 | – 618,22 | – 300 363,28 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Bovines | 2012 | Late notifications of movement | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 41 102,74 | 0,00 | – 41 102,74 |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 93 510 754,83 | 0,00 | – 93 510 754,83 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 100 407 258,08 | 0,00 | – 100 407 258,08 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2010 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 136 794 783,91 | 0,00 | – 136 794 783,91 |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 137 445 484,49 | – 51 680,63 | – 137 393 803,86 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 4 203 961,06 | 0,00 | – 4 203 961,06 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 115 587,10 | 0,00 | – 1 115 587,10 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Seeds | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 39 946,65 | – 608,31 | – 39 338,34 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 9 630 390,11 | 0,00 | – 9 630 390,11 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 1 576 620,23 | 0,00 | – 1 576 620,23 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 968 446,88 | 0,01 | – 968 446,89 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 37 597,17 | 0,00 | – 37 597,17 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 5 914,26 | 0,00 | – 5 914,26 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | 321,53 | 0,00 | 321,53 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Seeds | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 004,56 | 0,00 | – 1 004,56 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 7 377,43 | 0,00 | – 7 377,43 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 2 858,36 | 0,00 | – 2 858,36 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | 105,15 | 0,00 | 105,15 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 137 992 099,19 | 0,00 | – 137 992 099,19 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 4 605 692,86 | 0,00 | – 4 605 692,86 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 581 825,97 | 0,00 | – 581 825,97 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 9 587 507,15 | 0,00 | – 9 587 507,15 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 1 648 707,28 | 0,00 | – 1 648 707,28 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 100,00 % | EUR | – 930 705,93 | 0,00 | – 930 705,93 |
| FR | Entitlements | 2011 | Exceeding of the ceiling and incorrect application of the linear reduction | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 51 088 369,44 | 0,00 | – 51 088 369,44 |
| | Entitlements | 2012 | Exceeding of the ceiling and incorrect application of the linear reduction | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 89 806 974,13 | 0,00 | – 89 806 974,13 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | – 984 274 193,32 | – 543 280,52 | – 983 730 912,80 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| HU | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Silos in the premises | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 11 709 400,00 | 0,00 | – 11 709 400,00 |
| HU | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2009 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 152 928,36 | 0,00 | – 152 928,36 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2010 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 182 798,14 | 0,00 | – 182 798,14 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2011 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 121 313,14 | 0,00 | – 121 313,14 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2012 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 136 159,80 | 0,00 | – 136 159,80 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes | 2013 | Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 114 906,70 | 0,00 | – 114 906,70 |
| | | | | | Total HU: | EUR | – 12 417 506,14 | 0,00 | – 12 417 506,14 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| IT | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2007 | Not correct interpretation of sugar production | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 68 011 872,95 | 0,00 | – 68 011 872,95 |
| | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2008 | Not correct interpretation of sugar production | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 4 083 338,77 | 0,00 | – 4 083 338,77 |
| | Sugar — Restructuring Fund | 2009 | Not correct interpretation of sugar production | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 18 403 523,44 | 0,00 | – 18 403 523,44 |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2007 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 5 442,56 | 0,00 | – 5 442,56 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 25 041,16 | 0,00 | – 25 041,16 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 1 790 270,50 | 0,00 | – 1 790 270,50 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 20 819,74 | 0,00 | – 20 819,74 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2009 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 13 461,76 | 0,00 | – 13 461,76 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2009 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 1 177 488,95 | 0,00 | – 1 177 488,95 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2010 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 9 409,76 | 0,00 | – 9 409,76 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2010 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 12 880,77 | 0,00 | 12 880,77 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2011 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 3 366,26 | 0,00 | – 3 366,26 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2012 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 261,24 | 0,00 | – 1 261,24 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2012 | weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 427,98 | 0,00 | 427,98 |
| IT | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 1 767 966,48 | 0,00 | – 1 767 966,48 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2008 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 7 653,03 | 0,00 | – 7 653,03 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2009 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | – 275 541,07 | 0,00 | – 275 541,07 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2010 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 3 549,05 | 0,00 | 3 549,05 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing | 2011 | Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions | FLAT RATE | 15,00 % | EUR | 2 290,13 | 0,00 | 2 290,13 |
| IT | Promotional Measures | 2009 | Lack of control | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 173 822,13 | 0,00 | – 173 822,13 |
| | Promotional Measures | 2009 | Late payments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 701 700,28 | 0,00 | – 701 700,28 |
| | Promotional Measures | 2010 | Late payments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 497 130,75 | 0,00 | – 497 130,75 |
| | Promotional Measures | 2008 | unauthorised extension of the programme concerning the promotion of dairy products in schools | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 103 274,84 | – 16 388,37 | – 86 886,47 |
| | Promotional Measures | 2009 | unauthorised extension of the programme concerning the promotion of dairy products in schools | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 258 332,75 | 0,00 | – 258 332,75 |
| IT | Financial audit — Overshooting | 2010 | exceeding of ceilings | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 9 590,84 | – 9 590,84 | 0,00 |
| | Financial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines | 2010 | late payments | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 4 006 192,72 | – 4 006 192,72 | 0,00 |
| | Sugar — Assigned Revenue | 2010 | sugar temporary restructuring — marketing year 08/09 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 3 821 654,32 | – 3 821 654,32 | 0,00 |
| | Milk — Quota | 2010 | milk levies | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | 193 832,77 | 193 832,77 | 0,00 |
| | | | | | Total IT: | EUR | – 104 955 175,60 | – 7 659 993,48 | – 97 295 182,12 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| LT | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2008 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 4 381 809,55 | – 16 050,66 | – 4 365 758,89 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 2 406,42 | – 4,81 | – 2 401,61 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 336,27 | – 0,67 | – 335,60 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2009 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 5 503 048,25 | – 19 432,96 | – 5 483 615,29 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 2 777,28 | – 5,55 | – 2 771,73 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 84,89 | 0,00 | – 84,89 |
| | | | | | Total LT: | EUR | – 9 890 462,66 | – 35 494,65 | – 9 854 968,01 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| RO | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 60 723 392,19 | – 2 629 950,76 | – 58 093 441,43 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 185 062,92 | – 370,13 | – 184 692,79 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 83 561,22 | – 7 140,83 | – 76 420,39 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 34 885 948,11 | – 765 982,00 | – 34 119 966,11 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 40 279,67 | 0,00 | – 40 279,67 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 14 498,34 | – 29,00 | – 14 469,34 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 23,62 | – 0,05 | – 23,57 |
| | Other Direct Aids | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 6,62 | 0,01 | 6,61 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 40 874,57 | 0,00 | – 40 874,57 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 98 628,64 | 0,00 | 98 628,64 |
| | Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 6,51 | 0,00 | 6,51 |
| | | | | | Total RO: | EUR | – 95 874 998,87 | – 3 403 472,76 | – 92 471 526,11 |

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

AT

Entitlements

2011

Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 276 374,35

0,00

– 276 374,35

Entitlements

2012

Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 293 850,15

0,00

– 293 850,15

Entitlements

2013

Consolidation of alpine pasture and multiple annual instalments

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 301 013,79

0,00

– 301 013,79

AT

Cross Compliance

2012

Deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2011

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 76 849,71

0,00

– 76 849,71

Cross Compliance

2010

GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 13 484,40

0,00

– 13 484,40

Cross Compliance

2011

GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 14 441,58

0,00

– 14 441,58

Cross Compliance

2012

GAEC on landscape features not effectively controlled, CY 2011

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 14 393,70

0,00

– 14 393,70

Cross Compliance

2010

No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 5,14

0,00

– 5,14

Cross Compliance

2011

No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 246,74

0,00

– 246,74

Cross Compliance

2012

No systematic follow-up of minor non-compliances, CY 2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 755,78

0,00

– 755,78

Cross Compliance

2010

Weakness in cross-reporting, deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2009

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 47 399,01

0,00

– 47 399,01

Cross Compliance

2011

Weakness in cross-reporting, deficiencies in sanctions for SMR7 and leniency in sanctioning for GAECs, CY 2010

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 91 372,17

0,00

– 91 372,17

Total AT:

EUR

– 1 130 186,52

0,00

– 1 130 186,52

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

BE

Cross Compliance

2008

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 3 389,17

0,00

– 3 389,17

Cross Compliance

2009

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1 856,51

0,00

– 1 856,51

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 89,72

0,00

– 89,72

Cross Compliance

2009

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 527 302,79

0,00

– 527 302,79

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 568,84

0,00

– 568,84

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 20,77

0,00

– 20,77

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 538 273,49

0,00

– 538 273,49

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 94,12

0,00

– 94,12

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 535 293,19

– 794,71

– 534 498,48

Total BE:

EUR

– 1 606 888,60

– 794,71

– 1 606 093,89

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

BG

Wine — Restructuring

2010

ineligible restructuring measure

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 16 046,31

0,00

– 16 046,31

Wine — Restructuring

2011

ineligible restructuring measure

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 27 397,90

0,00

– 27 397,90

Wine — Restructuring

2012

ineligible restructuring measure

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 97 089,53

0,00

– 97 089,53

Wine — Restructuring

2013

ineligible restructuring measure

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 33 338,19

0,00

– 33 338,19

BG

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2011

Non-application of regulatory exclusions

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 370 455,39

– 18 522,77

– 351 932,62

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2012

Non-application of regulatory exclusions

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 381 206,05

– 19 060,30

– 362 145,75

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2013

Non-application of regulatory exclusions

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 248 886,64

– 12 444,33

– 236 442,31

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2011

Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 521 954,26

0,00

– 521 954,26

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2012

Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 808 560,83

0,00

– 808 560,83

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2013

Undue payments, OTSC weaknesses, insufficient control report template

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 995 079,95

0,00

– 995 079,95

BG

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 13 598 952,95

0,00

– 13 598 952,95

Decoupled Direct Aids

2011

Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 77 724,05

0,00

– 77 724,05

BG

Decoupled Direct Aids

2011

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 14 660 582,12

0,00

– 14 660 582,12

Decoupled Direct Aids

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 7 964,58

0,00

– 7 964,58

Total BG:

EUR

– 31 845 238,75

– 50 027,40

– 31 795 211,35

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

CZ

Wine — Restructuring

2010

non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 690 350,42

0,00

– 690 350,42

Wine — Restructuring

2011

non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 865 307,63

0,00

– 865 307,63

Wine — Restructuring

2012

non-eligible forms of protection of vineyards against wild birds

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 567 540,99

0,00

– 567 540,99

Total CZ:

EUR

– 2 123 199,04

0,00

– 2 123 199,04

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

DE

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2010

ineligible expenditures for construction of a storage facility

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 430 654,77

0,00

– 430 654,77

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2009

Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 77 966,78

0,00

– 77 966,78

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2010

Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 153 735,28

0,00

– 153 735,28

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2011

Weakness in a control on recognition criterion for producer organisations

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 70 057,05

0,00

– 70 057,05

DE

Cross Compliance

2009

Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2008

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 190 178,10

– 379,60

– 189 798,50

Cross Compliance

2010

Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2009

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 150 339,66

– 300,08

– 150 039,58

Cross Compliance

2011

Leniency of the sanctions for SMR7, CY 2010

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 158 485,49

– 316,34

– 158 169,15

Cross Compliance

2009

Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 3 929 816,78

– 126,22

– 3 929 690,56

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 3 573 164,56

0,00

– 3 573 164,56

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 3 463 572,31

0,00

– 3 463 572,31

Total DE:

EUR

– 12 197 970,78

– 1 122,24

– 12 196 848,54

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EE

Cross Compliance

2010

1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 123 269,50

0,00

– 123 269,50

Cross Compliance

2011

1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 1,71

0,00

– 1,71

Cross Compliance

2012

Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of one SMR4 requirements, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 163 434,31

0,00

– 163 434,31

Cross Compliance

2011

Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 143 245,25

0,00

– 143 245,25

Cross Compliance

2012

Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 3,33

0,00

– 3,33

Cross Compliance

2010

No control of SMR6, non-application of sanctions for the late notifications and modification of sanctions, CY2009

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 22 887,71

– 45,78

– 22 841,93

Total EE:

EUR

– 452 841,81

– 45,78

– 452 796,03

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

ES

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Ineffectiveness of risk analysis

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 3 586 250,48

0,00

– 3 586 250,48

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

Ineffectiveness of risk analysis

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 1 866 977,31

0,00

– 1 866 977,31

ES

Decoupled Direct Aids

2008

Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 389 865,14

– 1 949,33

– 387 915,81

Decoupled Direct Aids

2008

Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 201 023,75

– 1 005,12

– 200 018,63

Decoupled Direct Aids

2008

Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2007

FLAT RATE

25,00 %

EUR

– 9 290 513,97

– 46 452,57

– 9 244 061,40

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 445 642,75

– 2 228,22

– 443 414,53

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 283 917,17

– 1 419,59

– 282 497,58

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Non-compliance with the eligibility rules on permanent pasture, CY2008

FLAT RATE

25,00 %

EUR

– 10 345 263,99

– 51 726,32

– 10 293 537,67

ES

Decoupled Direct Aids

2007

Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2006

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 20 976,39

0,00

– 20 976,39

Decoupled Direct Aids

2008

Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2007

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 1 994,65

0,00

– 1 994,65

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Deficiencies in LPIS and permanent pasture, CY 2008

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 294 932,52

0,00

– 294 932,52

ES

Cross Compliance

2009

Leniency of the sanctioning system, CY 2008

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 580 604,92

– 479,70

– 580 125,22

ES

Clearance of Accounts — Conformity Clearance

2011

material error

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 18 603,55

0,00

– 18 603,55

Total ES:

EUR

– 27 326 566,59

– 105 260,85

– 27 221 305,74

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

FR

Sugar — Restructuring Fund

2009

Correction due to partial restructuring instead of full restructuring

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 69 980 526,56

0,00

– 69 980 526,56

Sugar — Restructuring Fund

2009

Correction due to quota reduction instead of full restructuring

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 8 734 375,00

0,00

– 8 734 375,00

Export refunds — Live animals

2010

procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

– 94 156,69

0,00

– 94 156,69

Export refunds — Live animals

2011

procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

– 120 146,09

0,00

– 120 146,09

Export refunds —Live animals

2012

procedures not compliant with the export refund regulations

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

– 33 062,27

0,00

– 33 062,27

FR

Other Direct Aid — Bovines

2008

Late notifications of movement

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 39 685 694,63

– 198 428,46

– 39 487 266,17

Other Direct Aid — Bovines

2009

Late notifications of movement

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 41 704 273,69

– 208 521,38

– 41 495 752,31

Other Direct Aid — Bovines

2010

Late notifications of movement

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 41 590 433,76

– 83 423,53

– 41 507 010,23

Other Direct Aid — Bovines

2011

Late notifications of movement

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 300 981,50

– 618,22

– 300 363,28

Other Direct Aid — Bovines

2012

Late notifications of movement

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 41 102,74

0,00

– 41 102,74

FR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2008

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 93 510 754,83

0,00

– 93 510 754,83

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2009

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 100 407 258,08

0,00

– 100 407 258,08

Decoupled Direct Aids

2011

Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 1st pillar, CY2010

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 136 794 783,91

0,00

– 136 794 783,91

FR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 137 445 484,49

– 51 680,63

– 137 393 803,86

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 4 203 961,06

0,00

– 4 203 961,06

Other Direct Aids

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 1 115 587,10

0,00

– 1 115 587,10

Other Direct Aid — Seeds

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 39 946,65

– 608,31

– 39 338,34

Decoupled Direct Aids

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 9 630 390,11

0,00

– 9 630 390,11

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 1 576 620,23

0,00

– 1 576 620,23

Other Direct Aids

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 968 446,88

0,01

– 968 446,89

Decoupled Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 37 597,17

0,00

– 37 597,17

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 5 914,26

0,00

– 5 914,26

Other Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

321,53

0,00

321,53

Other Direct Aid — Seeds

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 1 004,56

0,00

– 1 004,56

Decoupled Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 7 377,43

0,00

– 7 377,43

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 2 858,36

0,00

– 2 858,36

Other Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

105,15

0,00

105,15

Decoupled Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 137 992 099,19

0,00

– 137 992 099,19

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg. 73/2009

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 4 605 692,86

0,00

– 4 605 692,86

Other Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 581 825,97

0,00

– 581 825,97

Decoupled Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 9 587 507,15

0,00

– 9 587 507,15

Other Direct Aid — Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 1 648 707,28

0,00

– 1 648 707,28

Other Direct Aids

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 1st pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

100,00 %

EUR

– 930 705,93

0,00

– 930 705,93

FR

Entitlements

2011

Exceeding of the ceiling and incorrect application of the linear reduction

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 51 088 369,44

0,00

– 51 088 369,44

Entitlements

2012

Exceeding of the ceiling and incorrect application of the linear reduction

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 89 806 974,13

0,00

– 89 806 974,13

Total FR:

EUR

– 984 274 193,32

– 543 280,52

– 983 730 912,80

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

HU

Sugar — Restructuring Fund

2009

Silos in the premises

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 11 709 400,00

0,00

– 11 709 400,00

HU

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2009

Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 152 928,36

0,00

– 152 928,36

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2010

Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 182 798,14

0,00

– 182 798,14

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2011

Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 121 313,14

0,00

– 121 313,14

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2012

Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 136 159,80

0,00

– 136 159,80

Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes

2013

Deficient checks of eligibility of expenditure declared in aid applications

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 114 906,70

0,00

– 114 906,70

Total HU:

EUR

– 12 417 506,14

0,00

– 12 417 506,14

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

IT

Sugar — Restructuring Fund

2007

Not correct interpretation of sugar production

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 68 011 872,95

0,00

– 68 011 872,95

Sugar — Restructuring Fund

2008

Not correct interpretation of sugar production

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 4 083 338,77

0,00

– 4 083 338,77

Sugar — Restructuring Fund

2009

Not correct interpretation of sugar production

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 18 403 523,44

0,00

– 18 403 523,44

IT

Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups

2007

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 5 442,56

0,00

– 5 442,56

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2008

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 25 041,16

0,00

– 25 041,16

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2008

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 1 790 270,50

0,00

– 1 790 270,50

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2008

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

– 20 819,74

0,00

– 20 819,74

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2009

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 13 461,76

0,00

– 13 461,76

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2009

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

– 1 177 488,95

0,00

– 1 177 488,95

Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups

2010

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 9 409,76

0,00

– 9 409,76

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2010

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

12 880,77

0,00

12 880,77

Fruit and Vegetables — Pre-recognised Producer Groups

2011

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 3 366,26

0,00

– 3 366,26

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2012

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1 261,24

0,00

– 1 261,24

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2012

weaknesses in the control system concerning the citrus processing scheme and preliminary recognition

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

427,98

0,00

427,98

IT

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2008

Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 1 767 966,48

0,00

– 1 767 966,48

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2008

Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

– 7 653,03

0,00

– 7 653,03

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2009

Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

– 275 541,07

0,00

– 275 541,07

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2010

Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

3 549,05

0,00

3 549,05

Fruit and Vegetables — Citrus Processing

2011

Weaknesses in key controls and failure to apply sanctions

FLAT RATE

15,00 %

EUR

2 290,13

0,00

2 290,13

IT

Promotional Measures

2009

Lack of control

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 173 822,13

0,00

– 173 822,13

Promotional Measures

2009

Late payments

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 701 700,28

0,00

– 701 700,28

Promotional Measures

2010

Late payments

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 497 130,75

0,00

– 497 130,75

Promotional Measures

2008

unauthorised extension of the programme concerning the promotion of dairy products in schools

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 103 274,84

– 16 388,37

– 86 886,47

Promotional Measures

2009

unauthorised extension of the programme concerning the promotion of dairy products in schools

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 258 332,75

0,00

– 258 332,75

IT

Financial audit — Overshooting

2010

exceeding of ceilings

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 9 590,84

– 9 590,84

0,00

Financial audit — Late payments and payment deadlines

2010

late payments

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 4 006 192,72

– 4 006 192,72

0,00

Sugar — Assigned Revenue

2010

sugar temporary restructuring — marketing year 08/09

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 3 821 654,32

– 3 821 654,32

0,00

Milk — Quota

2010

milk levies

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

193 832,77

193 832,77

0,00

Total IT:

EUR

– 104 955 175,60

– 7 659 993,48

– 97 295 182,12

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

LT

Decoupled Direct Aids

2008

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 4 381 809,55

– 16 050,66

– 4 365 758,89

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 2 406,42

– 4,81

– 2 401,61

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 336,27

– 0,67

– 335,60

Decoupled Direct Aids

2009

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 5 503 048,25

– 19 432,96

– 5 483 615,29

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 2 777,28

– 5,55

– 2 771,73

Decoupled Direct Aids

2011

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 84,89

0,00

– 84,89

Total LT:

EUR

– 9 890 462,66

– 35 494,65

– 9 854 968,01

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

RO

Decoupled Direct Aids

2010

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 60 723 392,19

– 2 629 950,76

– 58 093 441,43

Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops

2010

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 185 062,92

– 370,13

– 184 692,79

Other Direct Aids

2010

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 83 561,22

– 7 140,83

– 76 420,39

Decoupled Direct Aids

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 34 885 948,11

– 765 982,00

– 34 119 966,11

Other Direct Aids

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 40 279,67

0,00

– 40 279,67

Decoupled Direct Aids

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 14 498,34

– 29,00

– 14 469,34

Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 23,62

– 0,05

– 23,57

Other Direct Aids

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

6,62

0,01

6,61

Decoupled Direct Aids

2012

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 40 874,57

0,00

– 40 874,57

Decoupled Direct Aids

2012

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

98 628,64

0,00

98 628,64

Other Direct Aid — Energy Crops

2012

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

6,51

0,00

6,51

Total RO:

EUR

– 95 874 998,87

– 3 403 472,76

– 92 471 526,11

Totals by Budget Item: 6701

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | – 1 284 095 228,68 | – 11 799 492,39 | – 1 272 295 736,29 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

– 1 284 095 228,68

– 11 799 492,39

– 1 272 295 736,29

Budget Item: 6711

| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AT | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Lack of verification of all the parcels for Agri Environment measure during the on-the-spot controls | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 172 799,00 | 0,00 | – 172 799,00 |
| | | | | | Total AT: | EUR | – 172 799,00 | 0,00 | – 172 799,00 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| BE | Cross Compliance | 2008 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 132,46 | 0,00 | – 132,46 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 653,95 | 0,00 | – 1 653,95 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1,14 | 0,00 | – 1,14 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 295,08 | 0,00 | – 1 295,08 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 113,50 | 0,00 | – 113,50 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 24,08 | 0,00 | – 24,08 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 3 618,32 | 0,00 | – 3 618,32 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 319,78 | 0,00 | – 319,78 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 6 628,40 | 0,00 | – 6 628,40 |
| | | | | | Total BE: | EUR | – 13 786,71 | 0,00 | – 13 786,71 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2010 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 578 205,77 | 0,00 | – 578 205,77 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 056 462,98 | 0,00 | – 1 056 462,98 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 2 261,71 | 0,00 | – 2 261,71 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 26 659,78 | 0,00 | – 26 659,78 |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, RD area-based measures, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 053 616,25 | 0,00 | – 1 053 616,25 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, RD area-based measures, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | 27 637,25 | 0,00 | 27 637,25 |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2009 | deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 1 130 931,01 | 0,00 | – 1 130 931,01 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2010 | deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 2 900 737,58 | 0,00 | – 2 900 737,58 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2011 | deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 39 805,58 | 0,00 | – 39 805,58 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2012 | deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 497 441,06 | 0,00 | – 497 441,06 |
| BG | Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006) — Technical Assistance | 2011 | non-compliance related to measure 511 | ONE-OFF | 100,00 % | EUR | – 151 668,00 | 0,00 | – 151 668,00 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2010 | Several non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 10 606 528,94 | 0,00 | – 10 606 528,94 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2011 | Several non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 4 401 144,55 | 0,00 | – 4 401 144,55 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2012 | Several non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322 | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 4 378 829,25 | 0,00 | – 4 378 829,25 |
| BG | Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013) | 2011 | Double charging of meeting costs | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 924,76 | 0,00 | – 924,76 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2010 | Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 85 150,30 | 0,00 | – 85 150,30 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2011 | Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 284 234,10 | 0,00 | – 284 234,10 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2012 | Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 639 466,76 | 0,00 | – 639 466,76 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013) | 2013 | Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 580 221,14 | 0,00 | – 580 221,14 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013) | 2010 | Not sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 648,51 | 0,00 | – 648,51 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013) | 2011 | Not sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 4 495,26 | 0,00 | – 4 495,26 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013) | 2012 | Not sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 5 406,06 | 0,00 | – 5 406,06 |
| | | | | | Total BG: | EUR | – 28 397 202,10 | 0,00 | – 28 397 202,10 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| DE | Cross Compliance | 2009 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2008 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 330 782,29 | 0,00 | – 330 782,29 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2010 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 322 006,97 | 0,00 | – 322 006,97 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 351 121,54 | 0,00 | – 351 121,54 |
| | | | | | Total DE: | EUR | – 1 003 910,80 | 0,00 | – 1 003 910,80 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| EE | Cross Compliance | 2010 | 1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 86 527,00 | 0,00 | – 86 527,00 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | 1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | 456,86 | 0,00 | 456,86 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2012 | 1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | 603,29 | 0,00 | 603,29 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2012 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of one SMR4 requirements, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 90 866,75 | 0,00 | – 90 866,75 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2011 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 89 214,59 | 0,00 | – 89 214,59 |
| | Cross Compliance | 2012 | Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | 455,76 | 0,00 | 455,76 |
| | | | | | Total EE: | EUR | – 265 092,43 | 0,00 | – 265 092,43 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 479,90 | 0,00 | – 1 479,90 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 978 849,95 | 0,00 | – 978 849,95 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls | ONE-OFF | 100,00 % | EUR | – 12 597,37 | 0,00 | – 12 597,37 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 720,85 | 0,00 | – 1 720,85 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 096 710,18 | 0,00 | – 1 096 710,18 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls | ONE-OFF | 100,00 % | EUR | – 32 261,41 | 0,00 | – 32 261,41 |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | On-the-spot control weaknesses | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 22 983,32 | 0,00 | – 22 983,32 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | On-the-spot control weaknesses | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 451 758,84 | 0,00 | – 451 758,84 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | On-the-spot control weaknesses | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | 3,22 | 0,00 | 3,22 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | On-the-spot control weaknesses | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | 268,60 | 0,00 | 268,60 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2013 | On-the-spot control weaknesses | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 21 372,70 | 0,00 | – 21 372,70 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2013 | On-the-spot control weaknesses | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 601 583,12 | 0,00 | – 601 583,12 |
| | | | | | Total ES: | EUR | – 3 221 045,82 | 0,00 | – 3 221 045,82 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2009 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2008 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 14 456 604,50 | 0,00 | – 14 456 604,50 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2009 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 16 193 248,79 | – 14 486 350,16 | – 1 706 898,63 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2010 | ONE-OFF | 0,00 % | EUR | – 19 491 684,44 | 0,00 | – 19 491 684,44 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 7 299 553,84 | – 6 146 925,42 | – 1 152 628,42 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 6 946 695,98 | – 62 851,32 | – 6 883 844,66 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 20 046,89 | 0,00 | – 20 046,89 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 4 455 428,10 | – 11 315,10 | – 4 444 113,00 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2013 | Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2012 | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 6 185 646,07 | 0,00 | – 6 185 646,07 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2012 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (destroyed files) | EXTRAPOLATED | 2,50 % | EUR | – 450 688,26 | 0,00 | – 450 688,26 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2013 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (destroyed files) | EXTRAPOLATED | 2,50 % | EUR | – 450 688,26 | 0,00 | – 450 688,26 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2010 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks) | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 200 489,14 | 0,00 | – 200 489,14 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2011 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks) | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 67 364,26 | 0,00 | – 67 364,26 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2012 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks) | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 283 029,20 | 0,00 | – 283 029,20 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2013 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks) | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 97 146,22 | 0,00 | – 97 146,22 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2010 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database) | EXTRAPOLATED | 3,50 % | EUR | – 941 086,34 | 0,00 | – 941 086,34 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2011 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database) | EXTRAPOLATED | 3,50 % | EUR | – 496 893,06 | 0,00 | – 496 893,06 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2012 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database) | EXTRAPOLATED | 3,50 % | EUR | – 463 037,93 | 0,00 | – 463 037,93 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2013 | Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database) | EXTRAPOLATED | 3,50 % | EUR | – 711 789,53 | 0,00 | – 711 789,53 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 1 593 202,58 | – 338,82 | – 1 592 863,76 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 22 599 169,32 | – 14 045,11 | – 22 585 124,21 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities | FLAT RATE | 2,00 % | EUR | – 2 086 278,69 | – 66,59 | – 2 086 212,10 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 8 979 022,05 | – 3,78 | – 8 979 018,27 |
| FR | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | lack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 208 364,56 | 0,00 | – 208 364,56 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | lack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 140 966,63 | 0,00 | – 140 966,63 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | lack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 395 152,92 | 0,00 | – 395 152,92 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | – 115 213 277,56 | – 20 721 896,30 | – 94 491 381,26 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| LT | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2008 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 1 478 818,01 | – 200 608,66 | – 1 278 209,35 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2009 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 347,40 | 0,00 | – 347,40 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | 4 533,21 | 0,00 | 4 533,21 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2009 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 2 290 292,11 | – 1 030 733,22 | – 1 259 558,89 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | – 1 145 968,82 | – 1 143 299,68 | – 2 669,14 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008 | FLAT RATE | 3,00 % | EUR | 1 519,76 | 0,00 | 1 519,76 |
| | | | | | Total LT: | EUR | – 4 909 373,37 | – 2 374 641,56 | – 2 534 731,81 |
| MS | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| RO | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 22 850 154,78 | – 6 418 693,16 | – 16 431 461,62 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2010 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 8 507 107,30 | – 1 459 929,21 | – 7 047 178,09 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 13 471 514,97 | – 2 311 644,65 | – 11 159 870,32 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | – 129 773,68 | 481,74 | – 130 255,42 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2011 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 10 435,76 | 0,00 | 10 435,76 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 5,00 % | EUR | – 1 924 121,26 | – 330 203,99 | – 1 593 917,27 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures) | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 394 552,63 | 0,00 | 394 552,63 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013) | 2012 | Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks | FLAT RATE | 10,00 % | EUR | 60 445,30 | 0,00 | 60 445,30 |
| | | | | | Total RO: | EUR | – 46 417 238,30 | – 10 519 989,27 | – 35 897 249,03 |

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

AT

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Lack of verification of all the parcels for Agri Environment measure during the on-the-spot controls

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 172 799,00

0,00

– 172 799,00

Total AT:

EUR

– 172 799,00

0,00

– 172 799,00

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

BE

Cross Compliance

2008

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 132,46

0,00

– 132,46

Cross Compliance

2009

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1 653,95

0,00

– 1 653,95

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied and sampling used for land checks, CY2007

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1,14

0,00

– 1,14

Cross Compliance

2009

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 1 295,08

0,00

– 1 295,08

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 113,50

0,00

– 113,50

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 24,08

0,00

– 24,08

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 3 618,32

0,00

– 3 618,32

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 319,78

0,00

– 319,78

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in SMR 7, 11, 16-18, tolerance applied for SMR4, CY2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 6 628,40

0,00

– 6 628,40

Total BE:

EUR

– 13 786,71

0,00

– 13 786,71

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2010

Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 578 205,77

0,00

– 578 205,77

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1 056 462,98

0,00

– 1 056 462,98

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2011

Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 2 261,71

0,00

– 2 261,71

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in LPIS and administrative cross-checks, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 26 659,78

0,00

– 26 659,78

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, RD area-based measures, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1 053 616,25

0,00

– 1 053 616,25

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, RD area-based measures, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

27 637,25

0,00

27 637,25

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2009

deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 1 130 931,01

0,00

– 1 130 931,01

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2010

deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 2 900 737,58

0,00

– 2 900 737,58

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2011

deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 39 805,58

0,00

– 39 805,58

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2012

deficiencies in verification of the compliance with the business plan and in detecting the artificial split of a holding; lack of sanctions

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 497 441,06

0,00

– 497 441,06

BG

Rural Development EAGGF (2000-2006) — Technical Assistance

2011

non-compliance related to measure 511

ONE-OFF

100,00 %

EUR

– 151 668,00

0,00

– 151 668,00

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2010

Several non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 10 606 528,94

0,00

– 10 606 528,94

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2011

Several non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 4 401 144,55

0,00

– 4 401 144,55

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2012

Several non-compliances related to measures M312 and M322

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 4 378 829,25

0,00

– 4 378 829,25

BG

Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)

2011

Double charging of meeting costs

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 924,76

0,00

– 924,76

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2010

Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 85 150,30

0,00

– 85 150,30

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2011

Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 284 234,10

0,00

– 284 234,10

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2012

Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 639 466,76

0,00

– 639 466,76

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 — Measures with flat rate support (2007-2013)

2013

Not enough checks on eligibility of the beneficiaries

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 580 221,14

0,00

– 580 221,14

Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)

2010

Not sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 648,51

0,00

– 648,51

Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)

2011

Not sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 4 495,26

0,00

– 4 495,26

Rural Development EAFRD Technical Assistance (2007-2013)

2012

Not sufficient verification of the reasonableness of the costs

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 5 406,06

0,00

– 5 406,06

Total BG:

EUR

– 28 397 202,10

0,00

– 28 397 202,10

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

DE

Cross Compliance

2009

Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2008

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 330 782,29

0,00

– 330 782,29

Cross Compliance

2010

Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 322 006,97

0,00

– 322 006,97

Cross Compliance

2011

Weaknesses in the control of SMR7, CY 2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 351 121,54

0,00

– 351 121,54

Total DE:

EUR

– 1 003 910,80

0,00

– 1 003 910,80

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EE

Cross Compliance

2010

1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 86 527,00

0,00

– 86 527,00

Cross Compliance

2011

1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

456,86

0,00

456,86

Cross Compliance

2012

1 GAEC not defined, limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, CY2009

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

603,29

0,00

603,29

Cross Compliance

2012

Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of one SMR4 requirements, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 90 866,75

0,00

– 90 866,75

Cross Compliance

2011

Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 89 214,59

0,00

– 89 214,59

Cross Compliance

2012

Limited control on SMR1 and 5, inadequate control of two SMR4 requirements, no respect of the seven days' deadline for notification, CY2010

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

455,76

0,00

455,76

Total EE:

EUR

– 265 092,43

0,00

– 265 092,43

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

ES

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 1 479,90

0,00

– 1 479,90

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 978 849,95

0,00

– 978 849,95

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls

ONE-OFF

100,00 %

EUR

– 12 597,37

0,00

– 12 597,37

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 1 720,85

0,00

– 1 720,85

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1 096 710,18

0,00

– 1 096 710,18

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in on-the-spot controls

ONE-OFF

100,00 %

EUR

– 32 261,41

0,00

– 32 261,41

ES

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

On-the-spot control weaknesses

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 22 983,32

0,00

– 22 983,32

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

On-the-spot control weaknesses

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 451 758,84

0,00

– 451 758,84

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

On-the-spot control weaknesses

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

3,22

0,00

3,22

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

On-the-spot control weaknesses

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

268,60

0,00

268,60

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2013

On-the-spot control weaknesses

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 21 372,70

0,00

– 21 372,70

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2013

On-the-spot control weaknesses

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 601 583,12

0,00

– 601 583,12

Total ES:

EUR

– 3 221 045,82

0,00

– 3 221 045,82

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2009

Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2008

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 14 456 604,50

0,00

– 14 456 604,50

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2009

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 16 193 248,79

– 14 486 350,16

– 1 706 898,63

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in functioning of GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2010

ONE-OFF

0,00 %

EUR

– 19 491 684,44

0,00

– 19 491 684,44

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 7 299 553,84

– 6 146 925,42

– 1 152 628,42

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 6 946 695,98

– 62 851,32

– 6 883 844,66

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2011

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 20 046,89

0,00

– 20 046,89

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 4 455 428,10

– 11 315,10

– 4 444 113,00

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2013

Weaknesses in LPIS-GIS, 2nd pillar, CY2012

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 6 185 646,07

0,00

– 6 185 646,07

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2012

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (destroyed files)

EXTRAPOLATED

2,50 %

EUR

– 450 688,26

0,00

– 450 688,26

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2013

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (destroyed files)

EXTRAPOLATED

2,50 %

EUR

– 450 688,26

0,00

– 450 688,26

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2010

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 200 489,14

0,00

– 200 489,14

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2011

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 67 364,26

0,00

– 67 364,26

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2012

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 283 029,20

0,00

– 283 029,20

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2013

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (too late audits at banks)

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 97 146,22

0,00

– 97 146,22

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2010

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)

EXTRAPOLATED

3,50 %

EUR

– 941 086,34

0,00

– 941 086,34

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2011

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)

EXTRAPOLATED

3,50 %

EUR

– 496 893,06

0,00

– 496 893,06

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2012

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)

EXTRAPOLATED

3,50 %

EUR

– 463 037,93

0,00

– 463 037,93

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2013

Checks on subsidised loans not efficient enough (incorrect database)

EXTRAPOLATED

3,50 %

EUR

– 711 789,53

0,00

– 711 789,53

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 1 593 202,58

– 338,82

– 1 592 863,76

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 22 599 169,32

– 14 045,11

– 22 585 124,21

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities

FLAT RATE

2,00 %

EUR

– 2 086 278,69

– 66,59

– 2 086 212,10

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

lack of procedure to increase on-the-spot checks in case of significant irregularities

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 8 979 022,05

– 3,78

– 8 979 018,27

FR

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

lack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 208 364,56

0,00

– 208 364,56

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

lack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 140 966,63

0,00

– 140 966,63

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

lack of verification of the livestock density calculation during the on-the-spot controls

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 395 152,92

0,00

– 395 152,92

Total FR:

EUR

– 115 213 277,56

– 20 721 896,30

– 94 491 381,26

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

LT

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2008

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 1 478 818,01

– 200 608,66

– 1 278 209,35

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2009

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 347,40

0,00

– 347,40

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2007

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

4 533,21

0,00

4 533,21

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2009

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 2 290 292,11

– 1 030 733,22

– 1 259 558,89

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

– 1 145 968,82

– 1 143 299,68

– 2 669,14

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

shortcomings in LPIS-GIS, CY2008

FLAT RATE

3,00 %

EUR

1 519,76

0,00

1 519,76

Total LT:

EUR

– 4 909 373,37

– 2 374 641,56

– 2 534 731,81

MS

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

RO

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2010

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 22 850 154,78

– 6 418 693,16

– 16 431 461,62

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2010

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 8 507 107,30

– 1 459 929,21

– 7 047 178,09

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 13 471 514,97

– 2 311 644,65

– 11 159 870,32

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

– 129 773,68

481,74

– 130 255,42

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2011

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

10 435,76

0,00

10 435,76

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

5,00 %

EUR

– 1 924 121,26

– 330 203,99

– 1 593 917,27

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area-related measures)

2012

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

394 552,63

0,00

394 552,63

Rural Development EAFRD Complement to direct payment (2007-2013)

2012

Weaknesses in the administrative cross-checks and on-the-spot checks

FLAT RATE

10,00 %

EUR

60 445,30

0,00

60 445,30

Total RO:

EUR

– 46 417 238,30

– 10 519 989,27

– 35 897 249,03

Totals by Budget Item: 6711

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | – 199 613 726,09 | – 33 616 527,13 | – 165 997 198,96 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

– 199 613 726,09

– 33 616 527,13

– 165 997 198,96

---

Corrigenda

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/66

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 of 29 November 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the People's Republic of China and terminating the proceeding concerning imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 315 of 1 December 2010
  )

On page 15, Annex, column ‘Company Name’:

for:

‘Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company’

read:

‘Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd’

---