alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CITY OF EL PASO

,

Appellant,

v.

RHONDA E. LUEBS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 200

- CV

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018DCV2030 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a plea to the jurisdiction in a suit

brought by Rhonda Luebs against the City of El Paso for personal injuries. On December 5,

2019, the City of El Paso filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot because the underlying

case had been settled at the trial court level. The City’s motion, while not presented as an agreed

motion, nor containing a certificate of conference, does attach an orde r of dismissal signed by the

trial court which dismisses all of Rhonda L u ebs’s claims against the City of El Paso. The order

is also signed by counsel for the City and counsel for Luebs. 1

A case is rendered moot when: (1) it appears that a party seeks to obtain a judgment upon

some controversy, when in reality none exists; or (2) a party seeks a judgment upon some matter

1 Luebs has not filed a response to the City’s motion.2

which cannot have a practical legal effect upon a then existing contro versy. Beltran v. Beltran

,

324 S.W.3d 107, 110 (Tex.App.

-- El Paso 2010, no pet.). That is to say, when an actual

controversy no longer exists between the parties, “the decision of an appellate court would be a

mere academic exercise.” Id.

, quoting Hanna v. Godwin

, 876 S.W.2d 454, 457 (Tex.App.

--

El Paso 1994, no writ). Mootness can arise from events occurring after a case is appealed.

Olson v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline

, 901 S.W.2d 520, 522 (Tex.App.

-- El Paso 1995, no pet

. )

(l awyer’s challenge to his suspension from the practice of law was mooted by his death since the

relief sought

-- reinstatement of his law license

-- was no longer possible).

The settlement below which resulted in the dismissal of all claims against the City of

El Paso, similarly moots the issues before us. See Amarillo v. R.R. Comm ’ n of Texas , 511

S.W.3d 787, 794

- 95 (Tex.App.

-- El Paso 2016, no pet

. ) (settlement agreement mooted contested

decision of PUC). We accordingly grant the City’s motion and dismiss the appeal as moot.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

January 10 , 2020

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANADA20-0518THERESACARBAH,PetitionerandAppellee,andCHRISTOPHERCARBAH,RespondentandAppellant.ORDERFORSECONDEXTENSIONOFTIMETOFILEOPENINGBRIEFAppealfromCauseNo.DR18-100intheSixthJudicialDistrictCourtofMontana,ParkCounty,JudgeBrendaGilbertKarlKnuchelKarlKnuchel,P.C.101NorthEStreet,P.O.Box953Livingston,MT59047(406)222-0135karl@knuchelpc.comKatieGreenPoore,Roth&Robinson,P.C.1341HarrisonAvenueButte,MT59701(406)497-1200kcg@prrlaw.comCounselforRespondentandAppellantCounselforPetitionerandAppellee01/22/2021Case Number: DA 20-0518UPONreviewoftheUnopposedMotionforSecondExtensionofTimetoFileOpeningBriefbycounselfortheRespondent/Appellanthereinandgoodcauseappearingtherefor,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthetimetofileAppellant'sOpeningBriefisextendedtothe21stofFebruary2021.DATEDthis22nddayofJanuary,2021.JUSTICEOFTHESUPRMECOURTOFMONTANAcc:KarlKnuchelKirstenMullCore2CERTIFICATEOFSERVICEIherebycertifythatonthe22nddayofJanuary,2021,acopyoftheforegoingpleadingwasserveduponthefollowingnamedperson(s):KirstenMullCore1700WestKoch,Ste.9Bozeman,MT59715Datedthis22nddayofJanuary,2021V1445-W`Cf%Name101AtE"%att;v;riplen,i1799L27AdceessiSsactiiAlfOrTitleElectronically signed by:Mike McGrathChief Justice, Montana Supreme CourtJanuary 22 2021
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD STROUD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

K. NEVILLE, Corrections Officer, in

individual capacity,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-56929

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-06214-R-MRW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 24, 2013** 

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Richard Stroud appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his safety in

connection with an assault by other inmates. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

AUG 05 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-56929

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Weilburg v.

Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Stroud’s action because Stroud failed

to allege facts showing that defendant disregarded an excessive risk to Stroud’s

safety. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (claim of deliberate

indifference requires showing that “the official [knew] of and disregard[ed] an

excessive risk to inmate . . . safety”). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing without leave to

amend because amendment would have been futile. See Albrecht v. Lund, 845

F.2d 193, 195 (9th Cir. 1998) (dismissal without leave to amend is not an abuse of

discretion if amendment would be futile).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Stroud’s motion for

reconsideration because Stroud failed to establish any ground for such relief. See

Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc, 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th

Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and discussing grounds for

reconsideration).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,404,049
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,586,132
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,135,534
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         563,221
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    179,204,672
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,315,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             203,263,086
<DEPOSITS>                                 122,040,489
<SHORT-TERM>                                19,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            812,906
<LONG-TERM>                                 34,397,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,940,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             203,263,086
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,350,328
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              527,120
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               114,429
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,991,877
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,892,609
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,464,579
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,527,298
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  180,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,833,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,852,954
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,130,231
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,130,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,194,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   89,000
<RECOVERIES>                                  (31,000)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,315,740
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            92,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,223,740
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 266/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 266 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6313 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 266

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6313 August 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 2/2020 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council of 31 July 2020 amending Decision No 2/2001 [2020/1196] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 2/2020 of the EU-Mexico Joint Council of 31 July 2020 amending Decision No 2/2001 [2020/1196]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 79 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 79

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 9 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the President to issue a proclamation designating the week 
 beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994, as ``National 
                             Family Week''.

Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly society;
Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family as a unit essential to the 
        continued well-being of the United States; and
Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the importance of 
        family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is hereby 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the week 
beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994 as ``National 
Family Week''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
BTXN 099 (rev. 12/14)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Highland Capital Management, L.P.

Debtor(s)

 Case No.: 19−34054−sgj11

 Chapter No.: 11

NexPoint Advisors, L.P. et al

Appellant(s) Adversary No.: 21−03010−sgj

 vs.

Highland Capital Management, L.P. Civil Action No.: 3:22−CV−02170−S

Appellee(s)

TRANSMITTAL AND CERTIFICATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL

 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010, the appeal filed on 9/20/2022 regarding [126]

Judgment (final). Entered on 9/14/2022 by NexPoint Advisors, L.P. et al in the above styled bankruptcy case is

hereby transmitted to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

 This record on appeal contains all items listed on the attached index, and is in compliance with Rule 8010 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

 All further pleadings or inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to the U.S. District Clerk's Office until

such time as the appeal is fully processed in the U.S. District Court.

 The above referenced record was delivered to the U.S. District Clerk's Office on November 22, 2022.

DATED: 11/22/22 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/J. Blanco, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:22-cv-02170-S Document 2 Filed 11/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 31
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 228 (Monday, November 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70717-70718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30052]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY


Meeting of the President's Committee of Advisors on Science and 
Technology

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 16, 2000, 65 FR 69308, the Office of Science and 
Technology Policy (OSTP) published a notice to announce a meeting of 
the President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) 
to be held on December 1, 2000. This notice is to announce that the 
meeting is

[[Page 70718]]

cancelled due to conflicts in members' schedules.

Barbara Ann Ferguson,
Assistant Director, Budget and Administration, Office of Science and 
Technology Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-30052 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                             549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                       461
<INVENTORY>                                     21,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,249
<PP&E>                                          23,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,601
<BONDS>                                          6,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,992
<SALES>                                         63,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,243
<CGS>                                           52,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (46)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (462)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,732)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.24)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.24)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS") INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD NO. 128, EARNINGS PER SHARE. AS
SUCH, BASIC EPS AND DILUTED EPS HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY
DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Order entered November 19, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00073 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF IRA E. TOBOLOWSKY, DECE ASED

On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dal las County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 18 - 17620



### O RDER Before the Court is Dallas County and the Dallas County Med ical Examiner’s (collectively, “the County”) November 15, 2019 motion for extension of time to file their combined appellee brief and cro ss - appellant’s brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the County’s combined appellee brie f and cross

- appellant’s brief be filed no la ter than December 30, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News Tag:
  Jan. 24, 2022 75th Anniversary Celebration NORFOLK NAVAL BASE, Virginia —
                
                JFSC marked its 75th anniversary on 13 Aug 2021. Over the course of its history, JFSC has endured name changes, building changes, and legislative changes, but the College has held steadfast in
 Jan. 24, 2022 JCWS Returns To In-Person Learning NORFOLK NAVAL BASE, Virginia —
                
                Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS) returns to in-person learning after nearly two years of virtual classes.
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1184

For the relief of Jung Ja Golden.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. EDWARDS of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Jung Ja Golden.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR JUNG JA

4 GOLDEN.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Jung Ja Golden shall be classified

6 as an immediate relative within the meaning of section

7 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

8 for purposes of approval of a relative visa petition filed

9 under section 204 of such Act by Jung Ja Golden and

10 the filing of an application for an immigrant visa or for

11 adjustment of status.
2

•HR 1184 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Jung Ja Golden

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible,

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the

7 enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe10 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant

11 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed

12 by Jung Ja Golden with appropriate fees within 2 years

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Jung Ja Golden, the Secretary of State shall

17 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the following

18 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas available

19 under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and

20 Nationality Act.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KERRY MCNEIL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 451 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of January, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA- 2014 - 0257 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM012AD
737 - 53 - 1058, R3 --- 3/11/93 737 - 53 - 1058, R2, --- 12/7/89 737 - 53 - 1058, R1, --- 3/5/87

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221
DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Opinion issued June 21 , 201 2 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 11
- 00 913
- CV

——————————— CANDACE M. LARK , Appellant

V. SAVANNAH PLACE APART MENTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 1000862

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Candace M. Lark , ha s neither established indigence nor paid all the required fees. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also
T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005),2

§ 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 ( Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1) (lis ting fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant d id not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bland , Massengale , and Brown

.