alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. Section 1350



In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”)
by Nano Dimension Ltd. (the "Company"), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1)          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
March 7, 2017 | /s/
    Yael Sandler           
|------------------- | -------------------------------
|                    | Yael
        Sandler           
|                    | Chief
        Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charlie Lee, Also Known as Charles Lee, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Kleiman, J.), rendered September 22, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term of from lVi to 4Vi years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court did not violate defendant’s right to be present during all material stages of trial *(see, People v Mahmedi,*69 NY2d 759), where the only matter conducted during defendant’s absence from the early stages of a *Sandoval*hearing was a colloquy at which the court informed itself of defendant’s undisputed criminal record and made two preliminary rulings in his favor and where defendant was thereafter present and participated at the hearing prior to the court rendering its ruling.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling, which limited the People’s inquiry to whether defendant had been convicted of five misdemeanors and whether "some [of the crimes] involved theft of property”, constituted a proper exercise of discretion. By disallowing inquiry into the underlying facts of defendant’s prior crimes, but allowing mention of their theft-related nature, the court’s decision reflected a balancing of the probative value of the convictions on the issue of defendant’s credibility against undue prejudice that might arise from their use. We find unpersuasive defendant’s argument that the ruling was overly prejudicial due to the number of prior convictions allowed for impeachment purposes or in that the larcenous nature of the prior offenses and the instant offense might hint at defendant’s propensity to commit a specific crime. "[A] defendant cannot shield himself from impeachment on the *268basis of the very frequency of his offenses, or his tendency to specialize in his criminal endeavors” *(People v Brown,*161 AD2d 458). We note further that the court at the hearing invited defendant to renew any *Sandoval*arguments at the close of the People’s evidence, and that defendant did not avail himself of this opportunity. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
#### LANGHAM v. STATE.

No. 21182.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 30, 1940.

Shead & Smith, of Longview, for . appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was given seven years in the penitentiary on a charge of robbery.

, The record contains no bills of exception and the statement of facts was filed 91 days after notice of appeal was given. Furthermore, the statement of facts does not bear the approval of the trial judge. We are, therefore, unable to consider it. Tex.Jur. Vol. 4, page 420, and cases there cited; Floyd v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 614, 113 S.W.2d 894; Page v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 190, 117 S.W.2d 785; C.C.P. Art. 760, Sub. 5.

We find no error apparent in the record. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTzuCT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

LTNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

P1aintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-054-04-H

SHANA SUE MCALLISTER,

Defendant.

ORDBR ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UNTTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI]ILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 6360)(l), the undersigned District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated October tu ,2022

JAMES S HENDRIX

UNI STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-00054-H-BU Document 69 Filed 10/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 118
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 314 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.314
                                         Agreed to October 8, 1994      

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That a collection of statements made in tribute to Representative Jamie 
L. Whitten, prepared under the supervision of the Joint Committee on 
Printing, shall be printed as a House document, with illustrations and 
suitable binding.
    Sec. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed the 
lesser of--
        (1) 1,850 copies (including 400 casebound copies) of the 
    document, of which 550 copies (including 100 casebound copies) 
    shall be for the use of the House of Representatives, 110 copies 
    (including 100 casebound copies) shall be for the use of the 
    Senate, and 1,190 copies (including 200 casebound copies) shall be 
    for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing; or
        (2) such number of copies of the document as does not exceed a 
    total production and printing cost of $19,527, with such copies to 
    be allocated in the same proportion as described in paragraph (1).
Attest:







                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                               Secretary of the Senate.`
WILLIAM WALLACE

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2233

Opinion filed May 27, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

William Wallace, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCF Holding Company (the small business issuer), hereby certifies as
follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the small business issuer.

Dated this 12th day of May, 2006.



/s/ David B. TurnerDavid B. Turner, President and Chief Executive
Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



15
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Line Government Services, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W917BG-07-D-0005 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58560

Lea Carol Owen, Esq. Ben H. Bodzy, Esq.

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. Nashville, TN Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney James D. Stephens, Esq.

Assistant District Counsel U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East Winchester, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeal has been resolved by the parties'joint stipulation ofdismissal with prejudice. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. Dated: 26 March 2014

ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58560, Appeal ofLine Government Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 343 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 343

 To designate each of the months of May 1994 and May 1995 as ``United 
                  States Armed Forces History Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 1994

 Mr. Gekas (for himself, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Dellums, Mr. Solomon, Mr. 
Filner, Mr. Frost, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. King, Mr. Dornan, 
  Mr. Parker, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Hutto, and Mr. Kasich) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate each of the months of May 1994 and May 1995 as ``United 
                  States Armed Forces History Month''.

Whereas throughout the history of the United States, the Nation's tranquility 
        and pursuit of happiness have frequently been threatened or interrupted 
        by enemies of freedom;
Whereas millions of Americans have sent their sons and daughters to defend the 
        Nation during times of peace and times of armed conflict;
Whereas the history of the Armed Forces of the United States and the 
        contributions and sacrifices of its veterans are an integral part of the 
        Nation's past;
Whereas it is important to understand our military history and the role of the 
        Armed Forces of the United States in keeping Nation's citizens free to 
        enjoy the blessings of liberty;
Whereas the study of United States military history will promote a better 
        understanding of the complex problems associated with future global and 
        regional challenges;
Whereas the study of United States military history must be perpetuated so that 
        future generations of Americans will understand the sacrifices that have 
        secured their birthright; and
Whereas it is important to understand the past so that the lessons learned may 
        be applied in the future: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That each of the months of May 
1994 and May 1995 is designated as ``United States Armed Forces History 
Month''. The President is authorized and requested to issue 
proclamations calling on the people of the United States to observe 
these months with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SAN ANGELO DIVISION 

ROBERT SCHELSKE, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, 

United States Secretary of Defense, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No. 6:22-cv-0049-H 

PROPOSED ORDER 

Upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to dismiss and the memoranda in support 

thereof and in opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ amended complaint, ECF No. 92, is 

DISMISSED. 

It is SO ORDERED. 

This is a final and appealable order. 

Dated: 

JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX 

United States District Judge 

Case 6:22-cv-00049-H Document 105-1 Filed 03/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2273
P. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1827 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 124 ) IV-E-0 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 11/19/2008 12:40:48 PM Sheet 124 of 147^ PSr "r f . •o rs r UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e u fAi i Qualit yPlannin g an d Siandaid s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 

# A-^o-oto P. 2

MEMORANDU

M i SUBJECT : Meetin g wit hth e Industria l Boile r Owner s C* I r I FROM : Chebryl l C . Edwards , Projec t Manage r (W^y^t

TO : Docke t A-90-0 6 O n Augus t 23 , 1991 , Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) representative s me t wit hmember s o f th e Industria l Boile r Owner s Association!(IBO ) t o discuss , among othe r issues , EPA' s propose d "WEPCO " rulemaking . Th e member s o f th e IB O provide d EPAwit ha brie f overvie wo f thei r comment s o n th e propose d rulemaking . Theystate d tha t theywil l b e drafting thei r comment s an d formall ysubmitting themt o th e docke t i n th e nea r future . Th e IB O representative s mentione d tha t th e majo r focu s o f thei r comment s i s relate d t o th e issu e o f expanding th e rul e t o includ e industria l sources . Th e IB O believe s tha t industria l sources , alon g wit hothe r source s tha t "opt-in " t o th e aci d rai n program , shoul d b e give n th e same privilege s an d exemption s tha t th e utilityjsource s wil l receive . An EPArepresentativ e responde d b

ystating tha t ther e ar e severa l reason s thi s rulemaking i s limite d t o utilit ysource s (informatio n o n utilitie s i s availabl e throughfiling s wit hth e PUC ; EPAi s mor e familia r wit hmodification s a t utilit ysources ; and , utilitie s ar e t o play' a ke yrol e i n th e aci d rai n program) . Th e EPAals o state d tha t i t mayfurthe r explor e thi s issu e i n a separat e rulemakin g (CM

AExhibi t B) ; however , i t wa s mentione d tha t al l comment s o n jthi s issu e wil l b e thoroughl yconsidere d befor e th e WEPC O rulemakin g i s finalized .
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Treasury Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of the U.S. 
Customs Service; Meeting

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the date, time, and location for the 
first meeting of the renewed term of the Treasury Advisory Committee on 
Commercial Operations (COAC), and the provisional agenda for 
consideration by the Committee.

DATES: The next meeting of the Treasury Advisory Committee on 
Commercial Operations of the U.S. Customs Service will be held on 
Friday, December 1, 2000 at 9 a.m. at the Department of the Treasury, 
Secretary's Conference Room (Rm. 3327), located at 15th Street and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The duration of the meeting 
will be approximately four hours, starting at 9 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John P. Simpson, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary (Regulatory, Tariff and Trade Enforcement), Office of the 
Under Secretary (Enforcement), telephone--(202) 622-0230.
    At this meeting, the Advisory Committee is expected to pursue the 
following agenda. The agenda may be modified prior to the meeting.

Agenda

    (1) Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF) (Legislative Principles and 
Conditions for Renewal of MPF)
    (2) Office of Regulations and Rulings (OR&R) (Proposed Prototype 
for 3rd Party (HQ) Rulings)
    (3) Compliance Assessment Team (CAT): (Status of Discussions 
Between the Trade and Customs on Issues Raised by the Subcommittee's 
Position Paper)
    (4) Treasury Study on Customs Data and Record Keeping Requirements
    (5) Current or Proposed Customs Programs (Publication of 592 
Violators; Entry Revisions Project ``ERP-2''; Resource Allocation Model 
``RAM''; Post Entry Amendment Process ``PEAP''; Importer Compliance 
Measurement Project ``ICMP''; Commissioner's Trade Symposium Proposals)
    (6) G-7 Customs Automated Reporting Standardization and 
Simplification Initiative
    (7) Future Meeting Dates and Venues for 7th Term
    (8). Agenda Items for Next Meeting

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public; however, 
participation in the Committee's deliberations is limited to Committee 
members, Customs and Treasury Department staff, and persons invited to 
attend the meeting for special presentations. A person other than an 
Advisory Committee member who wishes to attend the meeting should 
contact Theresa Manning at (202) 622-0220 or Helen Belt at (202) 622-
0230 for pre-clearance.

    Dated: November 16, 2000.
Timothy E. Skud,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Regulatory, Tariff, and Trade 
Enforcement).
[FR Doc. 00-29816 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 48110-25M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-592-001]


Wyoming Interstate Company, LTD. Notice of Tariff Compliance 
Filing

November 14, 2000.

    Take notice that on November 6, 2000, Wyoming Interstate Company, 
Ltd. (WIC), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 2, Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 61 to 
be effective retroactively on September 29, 2000.
    WIC states that pursuant to FERC Commission Order, dated October 
26, 2000, in Docket No. RP00-592-000, this compliance filing is being 
made to remove incremental rate tariff language from WIC's Right of 
First Refusal, Section 5.1 of its General Terms and Conditions.
    WIC further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
WIC's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29586 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of

orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and

conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 4/8/96

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_______________

WILLIAM A. SOJKA, )

 )

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

 ) No. 95-1456

v. ) (D.C. No. 95-S-2545)

 ) (D. Colorado)

CHERYL SMITH, )

 )

Defendant-Appellee. )

_______________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

________________

Before PORFILIO, MCKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

_______________

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal following dismissal of a civil rights

complaint on the grounds of frivolousness and failure to state a
2

claim. Our examination of the pleadings and the record leads us

to conclude the district court did not err. We AFFIRM for the

grounds stated in the district court’s order of October 19, 1995.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Lowell B. Long, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

FILED 

FEB 2 4 2009 

NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON CLERK 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT' 

v. ) 

) 

) 09 0360 

Steven D. Bolton, U.S. Probation ) 

Offi~~ ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application 

to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be 

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal ofa prisoner's complaint upon a 

determination that the complaint, among other grounds, seeks monetary relief from an immune 

defendant). 

Plaintiff, an inmate at the District of Columbia Jail, sues United States Probation Officer 

Steven D. Bolten for allegedly "failing to provide reasonable notice of probation violation," in 

violation of the due process clause. Compl. at 5. He seeks $350,000 in monetary damages. Like 

judges and other court officials, probation officers "are absolutely immune from liability for 

damages" under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for actions taken, as alleged here, within the scope of their 

official duties as "an integral part of the judicial process." Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 

(D.C. Cir. 1993). The complaint therefore is dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this 

Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: February ~, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7791

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRI DIANNE NEWMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:16-cr-00705-TMC-8)

Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 24, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terri Dianne Newman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terri Dianne Newman appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Newman’s motion for appointment of 

counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Newman, 

No. 7:16-cr-00705-TMC-8 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 2020). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED