Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 22, 2000 / Notices 70367

with the terms of its recognition and to

investigate as OSHA deems necessary;

If SwRI has reason to doubt the

efficacy of any test standard it is using

under this program, it must promptly

inform the organization that developed

the test standard of this fact and provide

that organization with appropriate

relevant information upon which its

concerns are based;

SwRI must not engage in or permit

others to engage in any

misrepresentation of the scope or

conditions of its recognition. As part of

this condition, SwRI agrees that it will

allow no representation that it is either

a recognized or an accredited Nationally

Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL)

without clearly indicating the specific

equipment or material to which this

recognition is tied, or that its

recognition is limited to certain

products;

SwRI must inform OSHA as soon as

possible, in writing, of any change of

ownership, facilities, or key personnel,

and of any major changes in its

operations as an NRTL, including

details;

SwRI will continue to meet all the

terms of its recognition and will always

comply with all OSHA policies

pertaining to this recognition;

SwRI will continue to meet the

requirements for recognition in all areas

where it has been recognized; and

SwRI will always cooperate with

OSHA to assure compliance with the

spirit as well as the letter of its

recognition and 29 CFR 1910.7.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of

November, 2000.

Charles N. Jeffress,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–29845 Filed 11–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS

ADMINISTRATION

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Submission for OMB

Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Archives and Records

Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: NARA is giving public notice

that the agency has submitted to OMB

for approval the information collections

described in this notice. The public is

invited to comment on the proposed

information collections pursuant to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted to OMB at the address below

on or before December 22, 2000 to be

assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent

to: Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and

Budget, Attn: Ms. Brook Dickson, Desk

Officer for NARA, Washington, DC

20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the proposed information

collections and supporting statements

should be directed to Tamee Fechhelm

at telephone number 301–713–6730 or

fax number 301–713–6913.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(Public Law 104–13), NARA invites the

general public and other Federal

agencies to comment on proposed

information collections. NARA

published a notice of proposed

collection for this information collection

on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55304

and 55305). No comments were

received. NARA has submitted the

described information collection to

OMB for approval.

In response to this notice, comments

and suggestions should address one or

more of the following points: (a)

Whether the proposed collection

informations are necessary for the

proper performance of the functions of

NARA; (b) the accuracy of NARA’s

estimate of the burden of the proposed

information collections; (c) ways to

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity

of the information to be collected; and

(d) ways to minimize the burden of the

collection of information on

respondents, including the use of

information technology. In this notice,

NARA is soliciting comments

concerning the following information

collection:

1. Title: Customer Comment Form.

OMB number: 3095–0007.

Agency form number: NA Form

14045.

Type of review: Regular.

Affected public: Individuals.

Estimated number of respondents:

1,925.

Estimated time per response: 5

minutes.

Frequency of response: On occasion.

Estimated total annual burden hours:

160 hours.

Abstract: The information collection

is a customer comment form made

available to persons who use NARA

services or visit NARA museums. The

form is voluntary and is used to record

comments, complaints, and suggestions

from NARA customers. NARA uses the

information to correct problems and

improve service.

2. Title: NHPRC Subvention Grant

Guidelines and Application.

OMB number: 3095–0021.

Agency form number: N/A.

Type of review: Regular.

Affected public: Universities and nonprofit presses.

Estimated number of respondents: 18.

Estimated time per response: 6 hours.

Frequency of response: On occasion.

On the average, a press submits two

subvention applications per year.

Estimated total annual burden hours:

216 hours.

Abstract: The information collection

is prescribed by 36 CFR 1206. The

application is submitted by university

and other non-profit presses applying to

the NHPRC grant program for

subvention of part of the costs of

manufacturing and distributing volumes

published by NHPRC-supported

editorial projects.

3. Title: NHPRC Annual Sales Reports

for Subvention Grants.

OMB number: 3095–0022.

Agency form number: None.

Type of review: Regular.

Affected public: Non-profit presses

that have received an NHPRC

subvention grant.

Estimated number of respondents: 18.

Estimated time per response: 1 hour.

Frequency of response: One time only.

On the average, a press has two on-going

subvention grants and therefore submits

two sales reports per year.

Estimated total annual burden hours:

36 hours.

Abstract: The information collection

is prescribed by 36 CFR 1206. The sales

information provided by non-profit

presses is used by Commission staff to

gauge interest among scholars and the

general public in documentary editions

supported by Commission grants.

Dated: November 15, 2000.

L. Reynolds Cahoon,

Assistant Archivist for Human Resources and

Information Services.

[FR Doc. 00–29872 Filed 11–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 030–21059; License No. 22–

16537–02; EA–00–147]

In the Matter of Braun Intertec

Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota;

Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty

I

Braun Intertec Corporation (Licensee)

is the holder of Materials License No.

22–16537–02 issued by the Nuclear

70368 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 22, 2000 / Notices

Regulatory Commission (NRC or

Commission) on September 29, 1999,

and amended in its entirety on July 21,

2000. The license authorizes the

Licensee to perform industrial

radiography in accordance with the

conditions specified therein.

II

An inspection of the Licensee’s

activities was conducted January 26

through February 24, 2000, and an

investigation was initiated on February

7, 2000. The results of the inspection

and investigation indicated that the

Licensee had not conducted its

activities in full compliance with NRC

requirements. A written Notice of

Violation and Proposed Imposition of

Civil Penalty (Notice) was served upon

the Licensee by letter dated August 14,

2000. The Notice states the nature of the

violation, the provision of the NRC’s

requirements that the Licensee had

violated, and the amount of the civil

penalty proposed for the violation.

The Licensee responded to the Notice

in a letter dated September 12, 2000. In

its response, the Licensee agreed with

the violation, but disputed that the

violation was willful or was caused by

‘‘careless disregard’’ on the part of

licensee personnel.

III

After consideration of the Licensee’s

response and the statements of fact,

explanation, and argument for

mitigation contained therein, the NRC

staff has determined, as set forth in the

letter forwarding this Order, that the

violation occurred as stated and that the

penalty proposed for the violation

designated in the Notice should be

imposed.

IV

In view of the foregoing and pursuant

to Section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act

of 1954, as amended (Act), 42 U.S.C.

2282, and 10 CFR 2.205, It Is Hereby

Ordered That:

The Licensee pay a civil penalty in

the amount of $5,500 within 30 days of

the date of this Order, in accordance

with NUREG/BR–0254. In addition, at

the time of making the payment, the

licensee shall submit a statement

indicating when and by what method

payment was made, to the Director,

Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, One White

Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, MD 20852–2738.

V

The Licensee may request a hearing

within 30 days of the date of this Order.

Where good cause is shown,

consideration will be given to extending

the time to request a hearing. A request

for extension of time must be made in

writing to the Director, Office of

Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555,

and include a statement of good cause

for the extension. A request for a

hearing should be clearly marked as a

‘‘Request for an Enforcement Hearing’’

and shall be submitted to the Secretary,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications

Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies

also shall be sent to the Director, Office

of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555, to

the Assistant General Counsel for

Materials Litigation and Enforcement at

the same address, and to the Regional

Administrator, NRC Region III, 801

Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois, 60532.

If a hearing is requested, the

Commission will issue an Order

designating the time and place of the

hearing. If the Licensee fails to request

a hearing within 30 days of the date of

this Order (or if written approval of an

extension of time in which to request a

hearing has not been granted), the

provisions of this Order shall be

effective without further proceedings. If

payment has not been made by that

time, the matter may be referred to the

Attorney General for collection.

In the event the Licensee requests a

hearing as provided above, the issues to

be considered at such hearing shall be

whether, on the basis of the findings

made by the staff, this Order should be

sustained.

Dated this 14th day of November 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

R.W. Borchardt,

Director, Office of Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 00–29836 Filed 11–21–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket 70–7001]

Notice of Receipt of Amendment

Application to Certificate of

Compliance GDP–1 for the U.S.

Enrichment Corporation, Paducah

Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah, KY;

Notice of Comment Period

Notice is hereby given that the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC

or the Commission) has received an

amendment application from the United

States Enrichment Corporation that is

considered to be a major change in the

facility and/or the operating procedures

which could substantially increase the

risk. Any interested party may submit

written comments on the application for

amendment for consideration by the

staff. To be certain of consideration,

comments must be received by

December 22, 2000. Comments received

after the due date will be considered if

it is practical to do so. The Commission

is able to assure consideration only for

comments received on or before this

date.

Written comments on the amendment

application should be mailed to the

Chief, Rules Review and Directives

Branch, Office of Administration, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, or may be hand

delivered to 11545 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, MD, 20854, between 7:45

a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.

Comments should be legible and

reproducible, and include the name,

affiliation (if any), and address of the

submitter at the Commission’s Public

Document Room and the Local Public

Document Room. In accordance with 10

CFR 76.62 and 76.64, a member of the

public must submit written comments

to petition the Commission requesting

review of the Director’s Decision on the

amendment request.

For further details with respect to the

action, see the application for

amendment. The application is

available for public inspection at the

Commission’s Public Document Room,

NRC’s Headquarters Building, One

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, MD, 20852, and

electronically from the Publicly

Available Records (PARS) component of

NRC’s document management system

(ADAMS), which is accessible from the

NRC Web Site at: http://www.nrc.gov/

NRC/ADAMS/index.html.

Date of amendment request: October

20, 2000.

Brief description of amendment: The

U.S. Enrichment Corporation is

requesting that the assay limit for the

Paducah facility be increased from the

current 2.75 wt% 235U up to 5.5 wt% 235U. The proposed amendment, if

approved, would allow the Paducah

facility to withdraw from the cascade

and ship 5.0 wt% enriched uranium

hexafluoride (UF6).

Certificate of Compliance No. GDP–1:

USEC, in its proposed amendment, is

providing revision number 52 to the

certificate to allow the higher

enrichment. This amendment also

proposes changes to the Technical

Safety Requirements Basis Statements.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day

of November 2000.