alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~:;;_[;'?;\ u ' ; ;:•~"it':•:,..- #\ --

fl . -r,:;-·_:~; --' •,;~~, ! LU/J;{f IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .OR,,,E.,, , 01:)1. OFT)' 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WBBOCl< DIV!SfON ,. 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 2022 NOV 14 PM 3: 

24 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DEPUTY CLER!(._~ 

§ 

v. § CASE NO. 5:22-CR-084-H-BQ-2 

§ 

§ 

KINNSLEY CHARLIEANN MATHEWS § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count Two of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a){J) and 841(b){l)(C), that is, Distribution and Possession with Intent 

to Distribute Fentanyl. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate 

judge finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00084-H-BQ Document 44 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 86
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed November 14, 2022. 

RYANT, 

UNITED STATES MAGIS'E 

Case 5:22-cr-00084-H-BQ Document 44 Filed 11/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 87
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Yihua Kang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      November 9, 2009
              /s/
             Edward Yihua
  KangEdward
      Yihua KangChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1687
FRANCIS YOMI TCHAKOUNTE, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-692-621) Submitted: October 31, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007 Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Aviva L. Poczter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Patrick J. Glen, Trial Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Francis Yomi Tchakounte, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision to deny relief from removal. Tchakounte asserts that his right to due process was violated because a pretrial hearing before the Immigration Judge was not recorded or its contents otherwise made part of the record. We have independently reviewed the record with respect to this claim and find that Tchakounte has failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the failure to record the hearing. See Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 320 (4th Cir. 2002); 8 C.F.R. § 1240.9 (2007). Next, we find no abuse of discretion in the Immigration Judge’s denial of a continuance for adjudication of Tchakounte’s second I-130 petition. See Onyeme v. INS , 146 F.3d 227, 231-33 (4th Cir. 1998). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

 

ROBERT L. KIRKLAND, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-759-O-BP

 § 

COMMISSIONER OF §

SOCIAL SECURITY, §

 §

Defendant. §

AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to pay Plaintiff Robert L. Kirkland, in care of 

Howard D. Olinsky, an attorney, Olinsky Law Group, 250 S. Clinton St., Ste. 210, Syracuse, NY 

13202, fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the agreed upon, reduced total amount of 

$10,814.14 for 2.2 hours of attorney services in 2022 at a rate of $234.14 per hour and for 41.3 

hours in 2023 at a rate of $243.54 per hour and for 5.6 hours of paralegal services in 2022 and 2.5 

hours in 2023 at a rate of $100.00 per hour in each year.

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of October, 2023.

Case 4:22-cv-00759-O Document 31 Filed 10/02/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3380
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Aubrey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Kenneth R. AubreyKenneth R. AubreyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 2, 2007






---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

FEMA announces the following open meeting. 

*Name:*                         Federal Interagency Committee on Emergency Medical Services (FICEMS).                     

*Date of Meeting:*                         December 7, 2000.                     

*Place:*                         Room 4236, United States Department of Transportation Headquarters, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590.                     

*Time:*                        10:30 a.m.                     

*Proposed Agenda:*                         Review and submission for approval of previous FICEMS Committee Meeting Minutes; Ambulance Design Subcommittee and Technology Subcommittee Reports; presentation of member agency reports; reports of other Interested parties; discussion on Federal programs and policies regarding Public Access Defibrillation.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting will be open to the public with limited seating available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members of the general public who plan to attend the meeting should contact William Troup, United States Fire Administration, 16825 South Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727, (301) 447-1231, on or before Tuesday, December 5, 2000. 

                    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available upon request 30 days after they have been approved at the next FICEMS Committee Meeting on March 1, 2001. Copies of the latest approved FICEMS Committee Meeting Minutes are also available for viewing and download from the following site on the World Wide Web;                     *http://www.usfa.fema.gov/​ems/​ficems.htm.*

Kenneth O. Burris, Jr., 

Chief Operating Officer, United States Fire Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-29777 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-08-P
1

www.nationalgirlsinstitute.org

NGI Purpose

To advance the understanding and application of promising and evidence-based prevention, intervention, treatment, and aftercare programs and services for girls involved or at risk of system involvement. 

2

Listening Sessions Distribution

Procedures

20 Facilitators conducted listening sessions across the country

Listening sessions were conducted in urban, rural, suburban and tribal communities with staff, parents/caregiver and girls :

Northeast

Southeast

South

Midwest

Northwest

Southwest

West

Locations within these regions were selected using the following key indicators:

High poverty 

Foreign born 

Rural households 

Infant death rate 

High school dropout 

Child victimization 

Children in foster care 

Adult crime 

High proportion of girls’ incarceration 

3

Voices from the FieldRecommendations

Establish an information clearinghouse 

Address “silo-ing” across child welfare, public & mental health, education, recreation, etc.

Involve schools, families, and gatekeepers in raising awareness & provide specialized training

Include voices of parents/caregivers and girls in research & theory building about what works 

Develop standards of care to guide programming

The complete Voices from the Field: NGI Listening Session Report and Executive Summary has been provided in the Member’s materials.

Provide a clearinghouse of information that is responsive to these unique and universal needs

Address the silos of child welfare, education, mental health, public health, recreation, etc.

Involve schools, families, and gatekeepers in awareness efforts and provide specialized training for these groups

Include the voices of parents/caregivers and girls in the research and theory building about what works for girls 

Develop standards of care to guide programming

4

Voices from the FieldRecommendations

Provide pilot funding for family-focused interventions

Fund training that includes parents, girls & professionals and enhances sustainability for states, jurisdictions

Track the profile of girls entering the JJ system & monitor over time 

Identify effective strategies to engage families/caregivers in treatment

Research impact of social media on girls’ JJ involvement 

Evaluate how to streamline/coordinate policies & practices across systems -- while maintaining confidentiality

Provide funding for piloting of family-focused interventions

Provide funding for piloting of training models that include parents, girls, and professionals and create a format for states and jurisdictions/long-term sustainability

Conduct research to track the profile of girls entering the juvenile justice system and monitor changes over time 

Research effective strategies to engage mothers/families/caregivers in the day-to-day treatment milieu

Conduct research to increase understanding of the impact of social media and girls’ involvement in the juvenile justice system

Evaluate policies and practices across agencies and systems that can be streamlined while maintaining confidentiality

5

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image2.png

# image5.png

# image6.png

# image1.jpeg
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 The Case for Joint Acquisition Reform Joint and Combined Warfighting School, Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University
 JFSC students in Joint and Combined Warfighting School, National Defense University published, "The Case for Joint Acquisition Reform" during attendance at JPME-II. Published in JFQ 90, 3 Jul 2018.
 SHARE
 PRINT
  Joint-Focused Defense Acquisitions Acquisition Process Acquisition System Defense Acquisition System (DAS) (JCIDS)
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6475

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE WILFONG WITHERSPOON, a/k/a Spookie, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-91-35, CA-94-118-5-MU) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 12, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Wilfong Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Witherspoon , Nos. CR-91-35; CA-94-118-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 1998). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NUMBER 13-11-00396-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF A.N.S., A CHILD

___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, S.R.1, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at 

Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 09-60641-5. On October 24,

2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause 

was originally due on October 21, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Tiffany Garza, 

had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the 

 

1

In appeals from cases involving the termination of parental rights, the rules of appellate procedure require 

the use of an alias to refer to a minor, Aand if necessary to protect the minor=s identity, to the minor=s parent 

or other family member.” Tex. R. App. P. 9.8.
2

clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could 

be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). 

Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date 

of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

26th day of January, 2012.
# Official Journal L 148/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.148.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 148 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 561 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.148.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 148

English edition

Legislation

Volume 561 June 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2013/245/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 20 December 2011 on the State aid C 40/2009 and C 43/2008 for the restructuring of WestLB AG
  (notified under document C(2011) 9395)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2013/246/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 7 March 2012 on State aid No SA.29041 (C 28/2009, ex N 433/2009) Support measures in favour of Oltchim SA Râmnicu Vâlcea
  (notified under document C(2012) 1369)

   (1) | 33 |
| | | 2013/247/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 January 2013 on State aid SA.24123 (2012/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by the Netherlands Alleged sale of land below market price by the Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg
  (notified under document C(2013) 87)

   (1) | 52 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2013/245/EU

*

Commission Decision of 20 December 2011 on the State aid C 40/2009 and C 43/2008 for the restructuring of WestLB AG
  (notified under document C(2011) 9395)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 9395)

1

2013/246/EU

*

Commission Decision of 7 March 2012 on State aid No SA.29041 (C 28/2009, ex N 433/2009) Support measures in favour of Oltchim SA Râmnicu Vâlcea
  (notified under document C(2012) 1369)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 1369)

33

2013/247/EU

*

Commission Decision of 23 January 2013 on State aid SA.24123 (2012/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by the Netherlands Alleged sale of land below market price by the Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg
  (notified under document C(2013) 87)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2013) 87)

52

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.