alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1092 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1092

To authorize financial assistance for the Northern Mariana Islands, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1993

 Mr. de Lugo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize financial assistance for the Northern Mariana Islands, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Act of March 
24, 1976 (Public Law 94-241; 90 Stat. 263), as amended, is amended by 
adding the following new section at the end thereof:
    ``Sec. 6. Pursuant to section 701 of the foregoing Covenant, 
enactment of this section shall constitute a commitment and pledge of 
the full faith and credit of the United States for the payment of 
$120,000,000 of guaranteed amounts of direct grant assistance to the 
Government of the Northern Mariana Islands for capital infrastructure 
construction for the seven fiscal years 1994 through 2000, which 
assistance shall be provided according to the Agreement of the Special 
Representatives on Future Federal Financial Assistance of the Northern 
Mariana Islands, executed on December 17, 1992, between the special 
representative of the President of the United States and the special 
representatives of the Governor of the Northern Mariana Islands.''.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cv-01894-S-BK Document 15 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 138
#### Robert YORK, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22456.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 3, 1943.

E. H. Lasseter and Robert M. Allen, both of Henderson, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft, and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The appellant has filed a written application, duly verified by his affidavit, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard P. McCook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard P. McCook                                                                                   
|Richard P. McCook                                                                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US Oncology, Inc.

August 10, 2006
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-40075

Summary Calendar

_____________________

DIOTSIS DEE SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TYLER POLICE DEPARTMENT; MEDICAL

STAFF AT SMITH COUNTY JAIL;

RICHARD M. SMITH, Officer;

TOM DEAL, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-362

_________________________________________________________________

January 7, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas state prisoner Diotsis Dee Smith, No. 654148, proceeding

pro se, appeals from the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 claims of excessive force used during his arrest and

deliberate indifference to a serious health risk of contracting

tuberculosis by being placed in a cell with inmates infected with

tuberculosis.
-2-

He argues on appeal that the magistrate judge did not consider

all of the facts Smith presented. He also implies that the

magistrate judge did not conduct fair and impartial hearings.

A review of the hearing conducted in accordance with Spears v.

McCotter, 765 F.2d 179, 180-81 (5th Cir. 1985), the memorandum

opinion and partial order of dismissal following the hearing, and

the memorandum opinion and order following his trial on his

excessive force claims reveals that the magistrate judge considered

all of the evidence presented to her and conducted fair hearings.

Furthermore, we AFFIRM the magistrate judge’s orders

dismissing Smith’s claims essentially for the reasons set forth in

the magistrate judge’s memorandum opinions and orders of dismissal.

Smith v. Tyler Police Department, et al., No. 6:95-CV-362 (E.D.

Tex., May 1, 1996, and Dec. 12, 1996).

A F F I R M E D.
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2016-02-03 16:56:16","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"}],"value":"2016"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","DO","FinCEN","Fiscal Service","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["17","188","143","56","1965","13","344","60","29"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["18","113","145","64","1932","14","372","68","27"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["4","463","4","2","483"," ","4","2","1"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2016","quarter":"Q1"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          38,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,110,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,562
<INVENTORY>                                    880,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,098,369
<PP&E>                                       9,089,980
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,034,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,692,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,139,488
<BONDS>                                      2,814,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,014,110
<OTHER-SE>                                     951,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,692,574
<SALES>                                      7,828,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,828,553
<CGS>                                        5,177,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,177,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,034,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                409,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                   159,717
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            249,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   249,813
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Martin Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
W. Truitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) except that the financial statements in
                  the Report have not been reviewed by an independent auditor
                  because the Company has not yet retained an auditor to replace
                  Arthur Andersen LLP; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



By:       /s/ James W. Truitt
    -----------------------------------------

James W. Truitt
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2002
OFFICE OF THE A?TORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

iionorable Kofatr Garrison, Jr., Direotor 

TeWJe;nDepartmant of Public iiafety 

# Teaat 

Dear Sir: 0plnion lo. o-s 

You inquire in your 

with rrferenoe to Senate 

Legiulaturer 

attoo markl s*O931* to be 

he right ear oi 

gurea to be tattooed 

hoa8 --would he have to 

ration fee6? The point 

o olear up Is, does the 

on the mind'8 body oontoo brand, even though,thC 

s identical? 

ta should register tha mme tattoo 

fteroat loaatloar on the aninl*a body 

aatitute two separate tattoos? As an 

i owner A used the lnftials ‘58’ to tattoo 

n the left ear, und owner B. u#cU the lnftiala 

'J9' to tattoo his sheep in the right ear, would this 

be aonstrued as two different. and dlstinot tattoo branda?" 

-nata Bill 62 provlilse that the owaer ol any livestook 

in this state my III&B applloetion to the DeparGmnt of 

2ubi.h Liar&y for the registration of tattoo mark6 to be 

used upon suah &took, and speoifically provides that they 
11 

lioaorabls Iioaer 

"shall name the 

the tattoo mark 

Garrison Jr., Page I! 

plaoo or pert or the animal upon whioh 

Is to bs plaosd." 

86otion 6 0r the kot provides ror the payment 0r 

a fee of five dollars for seoh applloatloa filed. 

#is held in Opinion O-1114, oonstrulng artiols 6899d 

V. A. C. Y. that two person8 could bars ths sass brand 

by plaoine suoh brsnd at dlfrsrsnt parts of the snIabal*s 

body. Suoh opinion amwsxa your second pusrtlon and we 

enoLo8~1 a cropy tha3or ror your guidaanos. 

It Is our opinion that a person nay rsc;Istsr brands 

or the sams dsoign for use on two or &ore animals, ouoh 

brads bring applisd to a dlffsrent part of,ths snbal*s 

body, but that each will oonstltuta a separate brand 

requiring esparats applioatlona and a riling See of 

flvs dollsrs tor each applloatlon. 

Yours rsry truly, 

IN 

strong
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00297-L

§

DEZMOND RAHSAAN BARRETT §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

DEZMOND RAHSAAN BARRETT is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 1708, namely, Possession of Stolen Main. 

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 30th day of May, 2023.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00297-L Document 28 Filed 05/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
Case 3:22-cr-00341-K Document 27 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

IN THE LTNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

JOE B.,I

Plaintiffl,

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. Civil Action No. 1 :22-CV-015 l-C

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United

States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this matter should be remanded for

further administrative proceedings consistent with the Commissioner's [Unopposed] Motion.

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error

and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated

therein, the Commissioner's Unopposed Motion to Remand is GRANTED and this civil action

is REMANDED lor lurther administrative proceedings

t t't

SO ORDERED this .-,( / 6ay of February, 202

S C GS

R D STATES D CT JUDGE

lTo protect privacy concems ofplaintiffs in social security cases, the u

Plaintiffonly by first name and last initial.

igned identifies the

Case 1:22-cv-00151-C Document 17 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1406
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arthur J. Bourgeois, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Arthur J. Bourgeois

Arthur J. Bourgeois
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2004
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About
          Charter
          Legislation
          Members
          Meetings
          Reports & Resources

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
 Friday, March 7, 2008 Meeting March 7, 2008
Office of National Drug Control Policy
750 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC
9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

AgendaMeeting SummaryMeeting Attendance

March 7, 2008 Meeting Materials

**Presentations:**

Presentation on Drug Abuse and Public Health Challenges Among Youth
	Random Student Drug Testing
	National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign
	Drug Free Communities
	Prescription Drug Abuse
	Prescription Drug Abuse and Online Pharmacy Threats
	Treatment for Children of Drug Offenders and Drug Addicts
	OJJDP SMART**Legislative and Program Updates, Announcements, and Other Business:**

SAMHSA IAA update
	Legislative Updates
	Non-Metropolitan County Risk Factor Ranking
	FFP Deliverables and Calendar
  
Date Published: March 7, 2008
 Top

      Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

        
        
                        Facebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News Tag:
  Feb. 12, 2019 The Case for Joint Acquisition Reform JFSC students in Joint and Combined Warfighting School, National Defense University published, "The Case for Joint Acquisition Reform" during attendance at JPME-II.
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil