alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 38

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate

and the House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. BACHUS of Alabama, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. BUYER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CAMP, Mr. CANADY, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. CRANE, Mr.

CRAPO, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. DICKEY, Mr. DOOLITTLE,

Mr. EVERETT, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. GOSS, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr.

GUNDERSON, Ms. DUNN, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. HOKE, Mr. HORN, Mr.

HUFFINGTON, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. INGLIS, Mr.

INHOFE, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr.

KLUG, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. KYL, Mr. KIM, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr.

LAZIO, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr. LINDER, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. MCKEON, Mr.

MCMILLAN, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. MICA, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr.

PACKARD, Mr. PAXON, Mr. POMBO, Mrs. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. QUINN,

Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. RAVENEL, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr.

SANTORUM, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. TALENT, Mr. STUMP, Mr. TORKILDSEN, Mr. ZELIFF, Mr.

ZIMMER, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, and Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming),

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the number of terms of office

of Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
2

HJ 38 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years from the date of its submission

9 by the Congress:

10 ‘‘ARTICLE—

11 ‘‘No person who has been elected to the Senate two

12 times shall be eligible for election or appointment to the

13 Senate. No person who has been elected to the House of

14 Representatives six times shall be eligible for election to

15 the House of Representatives.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Berrus, True Name Curtis Burrus, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered September 19, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

The defendant waived his right to appeal as part of his plea agreement. As we find that this waiver was made freely, knowingly, and voluntarily, the defendant’s appeal must be dismissed *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0298 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 1 75 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29304]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 29, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Robert B. Mathieu, Delhi, Louisiana; to retain voting shares of 
Delhi Bancshares, Inc., Delhi, Louisiana, and thereby indirectly retain 
voting shares of Guaranty Bank and Trust Company of Delhi Louisiana, 
Delhi, Louisiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 9, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-29304 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 77

To prohibit any political demonstrations on hallowed ground of national

cemeteries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1993

Mr. SUNDQUIST (for himself and Mr. TANNER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’

Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To prohibit any political demonstrations on hallowed ground

of national cemeteries.

Whereas Arlington National Cemetery is the final resting

place for those who have proudly served in defense of

their country;

Whereas these honored dead are due the full measure of our

Nation’s respect and gratitude; and

Whereas it cheapens their service and demeans their memory

to make Arlington National Cemetery a prop for political

demonstrations: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Arlington National Cemetery be placed

3 permanently off-limits for political demonstrations and
2

HCON 77 IH

1 displays, and that the grounds of Arlington National Cem2 etery be closed to those who would use the grounds as

3 a backdrop for protest.

Æ
Case 3:22-cr-00145-M Document 320 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 833
Case 3:22-cr-00145-M Document 320 Filed 09/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 834
----

Action brought on 15 February 2006 — Chevalier Carmana and Others v Court of Justice of the European Communities

(Case F-14/06)

(2006/C 96/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Giovanna Chevalier Carmana (Paris, France), Alice Coda (Paris, France), Jacqueline Doucet (Paris, France), Françoise Kluss (Ollioules, France) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas and main arguments relied on by the applicants are identical to those relied on in Case F-128/05 Adolf and Others v Commission (1).

----

(1)OJ C 60 of 11.3.2006, p. 56.

----
September 10, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BRUCE LEE TAYLOR, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00614-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40999 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERTO ESPARZA-MACIAS, also known as Alex Casa-Olmedo, also known as Roberto Romo-Macias, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-118-1

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roberto Esparza-Macias appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Esparza-Macias contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should haveNo. 02-40999 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Esparza-Macias maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Esparza-Macias acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 125 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 125

 Designating May 1993 as ``National Community Residential Care Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1993

  Mr. Doolittle introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating May 1993 as ``National Community Residential Care Month''.

Whereas the need for quality, dependable health care for the elderly, disabled, 
        and mentally ill increases each year;
Whereas community residential care fulfills medical, social, and nutritional 
        assistance to those in need and who cannot care for themselves;
Whereas the community residential care industry is both national and 
        international, and it is deserving of recognition and appreciation;
Whereas the community residential care industry is staffed by committed, 
        hardworking professionals who dedicate their working lives to the care 
        of the elderly, the disabled, and the mentally ill;
Whereas those providing community residential care must meet stringent licensing 
        requirements; and
Whereas the community residential care industry provides a uniquely workable and 
        homelike environment for those unable to care for themselves at home in 
        a manner which promotes confidence, support, and self-esteem: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 1993 is designated as 
``National Community Residential Care Month''. The President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe such month with appropriate ceremonies 
and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 25, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00570-CV

RUBIE BUCHALA, Appellant 

V.

ROBERT JOHNSON, JR. AND AUSTIN COUNTY, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

Austin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 16CV-5395 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This appeal is from a judgment signed June 7, 2018. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the 

court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On September 11, 2018, notification was transmitted to all parties of the 

court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen 
2

days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this 

court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). 

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-083-02-H

ARISTEO GARCIA,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TTIE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

0 636OXl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling otder.

SO ORDERED.

Datedlantary'L4 ,2923.

JAMES SLEY RIX

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00083-H-BQ Document 117 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 270
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DANIEL LEMONS, #53313-074, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:22-CV-1824-B-BH

)

FNU MOQUIN, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the plaintiff’s claims will be DISMISSED

without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SIGNED this 13th day of November, 2023.

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01824-B-BH Document 22 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 96
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

BEN E. KEITH COMPANY, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00868

 §

BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION, §

et al., §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on 

PACA Trust Claims and for Order Directing the Release of PACA Funds in the Registry of the 

Court (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART, and Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment on Non-PACA Related Claims (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED on this 25th day of September, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00868-O Document 69 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 762
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE §

COMMISSION, § 

§

Plaintiff §

§

v. § C.A. No.: 3:22-cv-2118-X

§

TIMOTHY BARTON, CARNEGIE §

DEVELOPMENT, LLC, WALL007, LLC, §

WALL009, LLC, WALL010, LLC, § Jury Trial Demanded

WALL011, LLC, WALL012, LLC, §

WALL016, LLC, WALL017, LLC, §

WALL018, LLC, WALL019, LLC, §

HAOQIANG FU (aka MICHAEL FU), §

STEPHEN T. WALL, §

§

Defendants §

§

DJD LAND PARTNERS, LLC and §

LDG001, LLC, §

§

Relief Defendants §

EXHIBIT C

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 320-3 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 10828
CAUSE NO. 00-21-02991'B

SERENA BADGLEY, AS NEXT IN THE COUNTY COURT

FRIEND OF MINOR AT LAW NO.

vs. GOLDMARK HOSPITALITY, LLC DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS MEDIATION ORDER

This case is appropriate

for mediation pursuant

to Section 154.021 of the Texas Civil Practice

and Remedies Code. Within ten (10) days of the date of the this order, the parties shall confer

and decide on an agreed mediator for the case and all counsel are directed to contact that mediator to arrange the logistics of mediation within twenty (20) days

from the date of this order.

If the parties cannot agree on mediator, all counsel are ordered to advise the court of the lack of

agreement and the court will appoint mediator for the case.

After mediation, the mediator shall advise the court, parties and counsel, whether the case

settled or did not settle. The mediator shall not be witness nor may the mediator’s records be

subpoenaed or used as evidence. No subpoenas, citations, writs, or other process shall be served

at or near the location of any mediation session, upon any person entering, leaving or attending any mediation session.

The mediator will negotiate

reasonable fee with the parties which shall be divided and be

shared equally by the parties unless agreed otherwise. The mediation fee shall be paid by the parties directly

to the mediator, and shall be taxed as costs.

Each party and their counsel will be bound by the rules for mediation printed on the reverse hereof, and shall complete the information forms as are furnished by the mediator.

Named parties shall be present during the entire mediation session and if the party is an entity,

it shall be represented by counsel and representative with the necessary authority to negotiate

full, final and complete settlement.

The mediation shall be conducted by 12/02/2022.

Failure or refusal to attend the mediation session as scheduled may result in the

imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law, which may include dismissal or default judgment.

Signed: January 28, 2022

08-21.. CME 0RD

0299"” Mgék/ 252355.; “Wm"

JUDGE PRESID’ING

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 320-3 Filed 09/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 10829
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 126

To designate the weeks of April 25 through May 2, 1993, and April 10

through 17, 1994, as ‘‘Jewish Heritage Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. GILMAN (for himself and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the weeks of April 25 through May 2, 1993,

and April 10 through 17, 1994, as ‘‘Jewish Heritage Week’’.

Whereas April 26, 1993 and April 14, 1994 mark the fortyfifth and forty-sixth anniversaries of the founding of the

State of Israel;

Whereas the months of April and May contain events of

major significance in the Jewish calendar, including

Passover, the fiftieth anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto

Uprising and the opening of the Holocaust Memorial Museum in 1993 in Washington, DC., Holocaust Memorial

Day and Jerusalem Day;
2

HJ 126 IH

Whereas the Congress recognizes that an understanding of

the heritage of all ethnic groups in the Nation contributes to the unity of this Nation and,

Whereas understanding among ethnic groups in this Nation

may be advanced further through an appreciation of the

culture, history and traditions of the Jewish community

and the contributions of the Jewish people to this Nation:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, the weeks of April 25 through May 2, 1993, and

4 April 10 through 17, 1994, are designated as ‘‘Jewish

5 Heritage Week’’, and the President is authorized and re6 quested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people

7 of the United States, departments and agencies of State

8 and local governments, and interested organizations to ob9 serve such week with appropriate ceremonies, activities,

10 and programs.

Æ
Case 3:22-cr-00339-X Document 1 Filed 09/08/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1
Case 3:22-cr-00339-X Document 1 Filed 09/08/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2
Case 3:22-cr-00339-X Document 1 Filed 09/08/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3
Case 3:22-cr-00339-X Document 1 Filed 09/08/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 4
Case 3:22-cr-00339-X Document 1 Filed 09/08/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 5
Case 3:22-cv-02130-N-BT Document 3 Filed 09/26/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 5
Case 3:22-cv-02130-N-BT Document 3 Filed 09/26/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 6
Case 3:22-cv-02130-N-BT Document 3 Filed 09/26/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 7
Case 3:22-cv-02130-N-BT Document 3 Filed 09/26/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 8
Case 3:22-cv-02130-N-BT Document 3 Filed 09/26/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 9
Case 3:22-cv-02130-N-BT Document 3 Filed 09/26/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 10