alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000813

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VERNON T. VIERRA, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2PC151000078)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before December 30, 2019, and January 27, 2020, respectively;

(2) Defendant-Appellant Vernon T. Vierra (Vierra) failed to file either document, or request an extension of time;

(3) On July 24, 2024, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing Vierra's counsel of record in this appeal, David Sumner Wiltsie, that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on August 5, 2024, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Vierra could request relief from default by motion; and

(4) Vierra has not taken any further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000813 13-AUG-2024 08:17 AM Dkt. 21 ODSDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will take no further action on the September 24, 2020 order to show cause.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, August 13, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

2
EVIDENCE OF LEGAL AUTHORITY 

40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V, 2.1(c) 

Laws of New Hampshire, RSA 125-C:4 

Rulemaking Authority; Subpoena Power 
Item 10. The full text of each RSA passage that grants rulemaking authority for the rules contained in the proposal. 

CHAPTER 125-C 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

Section 125-C:4 

125-C :4 Rulemaking Authority; Subpoena Power. - 

1. The commissioner shall adopt rules under RSA 541-A, relative to : 

(a) The prevention, control, abatement, and limitation of air pollution, including, but not limited to, open air 

source pollution, mobile source pollution, and stationary source pollution. 

(b) Primary and secondary ambient air quality standards. 

(c) Procedures to meet air pollution emergencies, as authorized by RSA 125-C:9 . 

(d) The establishment and operation of a statewide permit system, as authorized by RSA 125-C :6, XIV, 

RSA 125-C :11, 1 and RSA 125-C :11, I-a. 

(e) Devices, in addition to those devices defined under RSA 125-C :2, subject to the permit requirements of 

RSA 125-C :l 1, as authorized by RSA 125-C:l 1, II . 

(f) The exemption of certain devices and non-Title V sources from the permit requirements of RSA 125-

C:11, I and the conformance of exempted devices to established standards, as authorized by RSA 125-C :I 1, I. 

(g) The forms and information required on applications for temporary and permanent permits required 

under RSA 125-C:11, as authorized by RSA 125-C :12, I. 

(h) Notification of and public hearing on permit applications, including exemptions from those 

requirements, as authorized by RSA 125-C:12,11. 

(i) Fees for permit application and review, as authorized by RSA 125-C:12, IV . 

(j) Procedures for permit application review, as authorized by RSA 125-C:11, IV, and criteria for permit 

3enial, suspension or revocation, as authorized by RSA 125-C:13 . 

(k) Procedures for air testing and monitoring and recordkeeping, as authorized by RSA 125-C :6, XI. 

(1) Procedures for receiving violation complaints and for rules enforcement, as authorized by RSA 125-

C:15, I. 

(m) Procedures for granting variances, as authorized by RSA 125-C :16. 

(n) The manufacture, use, or sale of consumer products for purposes of implementing RSA 485 :16-c. 

I-a. In adopting rules under paragraph I, the department may incorporate by reference standards issued by the 

California air resources board relative to certification and testing of vapor recovery equipment. 

I-b . In adopting rules under subparagraph I(n), the department may incorporate by reference other state test 

methods and procedures that are referenced in the model rules of the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) 

concerning consumer products, as defined in RSA 125-C :2, V-c. 

II . The commissioner is authorized to issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of such witnesses and the 

production of such evidence and to administer such oaths and to take such testimony as he may deem necessary. 

Source. 1979, 359:2 . 1986, 202:8, eff. July 1, 1986 . 1996, 228 :19, 104, eff. July 1, 1996; 278 :2, 3, eff. Aug. 9, 

1996. 2001, 293 :5, eff. July 17, 2001 . 2003, 137:3, ef£ Jan. 1, 2004. 2004, 175 :2, eff. May 27, 2004.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ELIE KANDA MUKALA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:22-CV-2016-K (BH)

)

GARLAND P.D., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any

objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion

that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are

accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The case will be dismissed by

separate judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders.

SO ORDERED.

Signed December 13

th

, 2022.

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02016-K-BH Document 9 Filed 12/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER RUSANOWSKY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF DALLAS and SGT.

ROGER A. RUDLOFF, individually 

and in his official capacity as a Dallas 

Police Department Police Officer,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-1132

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DISCOVERY RESPONSE

Plaintiff respectfully advises the Court that on April 6, 2023, Plaintiff provided to 

Defendants his written response to Defendants’ Court-authorized interrogatory (Dkt. 39 at 4). 

Dated: April 6, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ David W. Henderson

David W. Henderson

Texas State Bar No. 24032292

dhenderson@equalrights.law

J. Sebastian Van Coevorden

Texas State Bar No. 24128101

svancoevorden@equalrights.law

ELLWANGER LAW LLLP

400 S. Zang Blvd. Ste. 600

Dallas, TX 75208

Telephone: (469) 998-6775

Facsimile: (469) 998-6775

Case 3:22-cv-01132-K Document 42 Filed 04/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 422
2

Peter B. Steffensen

Texas State Bar No. 24106464

psteffensen@smu.edu

SMU DEDMAN SCHOOL OF LAW

FIRST AMENDMENT CLINIC

P.O. Box 750116

Dallas, TX 75275

Telephone: (214) 768-4077

Facsimile: (214) 768-1611

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 6th day of April, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

document was served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Peter B. Steffensen

Peter B. Steffensen

Case 3:22-cv-01132-K Document 42 Filed 04/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 423
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-51446

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JOSE ROMERO-ROMERO,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(05-CR-79)

---------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to remand case to district court for resentencing

is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to extend time to file appellee’s brief for 30 days from

this court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is

DENIED as unnecessary.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 10, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### HUNTSINGER v. GATES RUBBER CO.

No. 5274.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

March 10, 1941.

F. A. Cooper, of Amarillo, for appellee.

STOKES, Justice.

This case is before us upon the transcript, but no statement of facts -appears in the record. Neither the appellant nor the appellee has filed a brief, but appellee has filed a motion in which he asks that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed and that he have judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond. We have examined the record' and find that the cause of action is one of which the trial court had jurisdiction and no fundamental error appears. The motion of appellee will, therefore, be granted, the judgment of *633
      *the*court below affirmed, and judgment here rendered against the sureties on appellant’s supersedeas bond for the full amount of the judgment below. Art. 1857, R.C.S., 1925; Cockburn v. Hightower,. Chief Justice, et al., 121 Tex. 555, 52 S.W.2d 365; Beauty Service Corporation v. Davis, Tex.Civ.App., 116 S.W.2d 463.

Affirmed with judgment against sureties.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 425

Providing for the convening of the First Session of the One Hundred Fourth

Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. HOYER introduced the following joint resolution; which was considered

and passed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the convening of the First Session of the One

Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the first regular session of the One Hundred Fourth

4 Congress shall begin at noon on Wednesday, January 4,

5 1995.
Exhibit 10.26


 


 


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment To Executive Employment Agreement
(“Amendment”), dated June 30, 2015, hereby amends the Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated the July 1, 2013 between Reprints Desk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Research Solutions,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Research Solutions”), and Alan Urban (“Executive”), an individual.


 


WHEREAS, the parties
have complied with the terms of the Agreement until the date hereof; and


 


WHEREAS, Reprints Desk
and Executive wish to amend the terms of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for
the mutual promises and other consideration described herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	Section 1(d) Term is amended as follows



 


Term. The term of employment of Executive by
the Company pursuant to this Employment Agreement shall be for the period commencing on the Commencement Date and ending on June
30, 2017, or such earlier date that Employee’s employment is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Employment
Agreement.


 


		2.	Section 2(a) Base Salary is amended as follows



 


Base Salary. In consideration of the services
to be rendered under this Agreement, the Company shall pay Executive a salary at the rate of Two Hundred Thirty One Thousand Four
Hundred and Forty Dollars ($231,440) per year (“Base Salary”). The Base Salary shall be paid in accordance with
the Company’s regularly established payroll practice. Executive’s Base Salary will be reviewed from time to time in
accordance with the established procedures of the Company for adjusting salaries for similarly situated employees and may be adjusted
in the sole discretion of the Company.


 


Except as expressly amended or modified
herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved and shall remain in full force and
effect. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall govern.


 


This Amendment and all acts and transactions
pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.


 


This Amendment may be executed and delivered
by facsimile signature and in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


REPRINTS DESK, INC.: 


 





	By:  ___________________________		Name and Title: Peter Derycz, CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	RESEARCH SOLUTIONS, INC.: 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  ___________________________		Name and Title: Peter Derycz, CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE:	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  ___________________________		Name: Alan Urban
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1062 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1062

 To impose certain restrictions on franked mass mailings by any Member 
  of the House of Representatives who is a candidate for such office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

Mr. Santorum (for himself and Mr. Inglis of South Carolina) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To impose certain restrictions on franked mass mailings by any Member 
  of the House of Representatives who is a candidate for such office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That a newsletter or 
other piece of mail in a mass mailing under the frank of an incumbent 
Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the 
Congress who is a candidate for such office may not contain--
            (1) any picture other than one photograph in the masthead;
            (2) more than 16 personal references to the incumbent;
            (3) any content that is not related to legislation or 
        legislative activity; or
            (4) any personal reference to the incumbent (other than in 
        the masthead) in type greater in size than 14-point type.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 80 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 80

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 20 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating May 30, 1993, through June 7, 1993, as a ``Time for the 
   National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II''.

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States of America made tremendous 
        sacrifices during World War II to save the world from tyranny and 
        aggression;
Whereas the winds of freedom and democracy sweeping the globe today spring from 
        the principles for which over four hundred thousand Americans gave their 
        lives in World War II;
Whereas World War II and the events that led up to that war must be understood 
        in order that we may better understand our own times, and more fully 
        appreciate the reasons why eternal vigilance against any form of tyranny 
        is so important;
Whereas the World War II era, as reflected in its family life, industry, and 
        entertainment, was a unique period in American history, and epitomized 
        our Nation's philosophy of hard work, courage, and tenacity in the face 
        of adversity;
Whereas, between 1991 and 1995, over nine million American veterans of World War 
        II will be holding reunions and conferences and otherwise commemorating 
        the fiftieth anniversary of various events relating to World War II; and
Whereas June 4, 1993, marks the Battle of Midway, and June 6, 1993, marks the 
        anniversary of D-Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 30, 1993, through 
June 7, 1993, is designated as a ``Time for the National Observance of 
the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe that period with appropriate ceremonies 
and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 19, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda

November 6, 2014

1:00 – 1:10 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance Office

1:10 – 1:15 New Business 

 Certification of August 7, 2014 Meeting Minutes

1:15 – 2:05 Discussion of the Role of Cyber Insurance in Cybersecurity 

 Presentation by Adam Sedgewick on National Institute of Standards 

 and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework

 Presentation by Catherine Mulligan (Zurich N.A.) on Security & Privacy 

 Insurance Landscape

 Discussion

2:05 – 2:15 Break

2:15 – 3:00 Discussion of the Affordability of Auto Insurance 

 Presentation by J. Robert Hunter (Consumer Federation of America) 

 on the Cost of Mandatory Auto Insurance for Lower Income Households

 Discussion

3:00 – 3:50 Discussion of International Supervisory Standards for Insurers, Including Capital

 Presentation by Tom Finnell (Federal Insurance Office)

 Discussion of Workstreams of the International Association of 

 Insurance Supervisors

 Discussion of Insurance Capital Standards (ICS) and the 

 U.S. Proposal on ICS 

 Discussion of EU-U.S. Insurance Project

3:50 - 4:00 Discussion of Subcommittees 

4:00 Adjourn

Federal Insurance Office

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda

February 22, 2018

 -

1:00 – 1:15 Welcome & Introductions 

1:15 – 2:15 The Long Term Care Insurance Marketplace

• Marc Cohen, Clinical Professor, University of Massachusetts Boston

• Charles (“Chuck”) Piacentini, Vice President, Insurance Relation & 

Associate General Counsel 

2:15 – 3:05 Systemic Cyber Risk & Exposure of the Insurance Industry

• Ron Bushar, Vice President, Global Government Services, FireEye

3:05 – 3:25 Break

3:25 – 4:10 Natural Catastrophes and Mitigation 

• Tyler Corson-Rickert, Federal Emergency Management 

Administration (FEMA)

• Amy Bach, Executive Director, United Policyholders 

4:10 - 4:20 New Business

• FIO Update

• Steven Seitz, Deputy Director, Federal Insurance Office 

4:30 Adjourn
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7552

ALESSANDRO TALONI,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BRICK TRIPP; W. BRANCH,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02089-D)

Submitted: May 21, 2018 Decided: June 1, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alessandro Taloni, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alessandro Taloni, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taloni v. Tripp, No. 5:16-hc-02089-D 

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1081 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1081

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit transportation 
             of illegal aliens for purposes of employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1993

Mr. Gallegly (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Hunter, Mr. 
 Oxley, Mr. Stump, Mr. Baker, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Dreier, 
  Mr. McKeon, Mr. Beilenson, Mr. Archer, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Lewis of 
California, Mr. McCandless, Mr. Weldon, Mr. Royce, Mr. Goss, Mr. Barton 
of Texas, Mr. Packard, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. 
   McCollum, Mr. Thomas of California, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Herger, Mr. 
   Calvert, Mr. Horn, Mr. Pombo, and Mr. Huffington) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit transportation 
             of illegal aliens for purposes of employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Illegal Alien Transportation 
Prevention Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF TRANSPORTATION OF ALIENS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              EMPLOYMENT.

    Section 274(a)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon at 
the end the following: ``or in furtherance of the employment of such 
alien''.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BRODERICK GAMBLE, §

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-cv-01373-M (BT)

§

DAVID WILLIAM BARRY, et al.,

 Defendants.

§

§

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has taken under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated July 8, 2022. The Court has reviewed 

the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error and has found none. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-01373-M-BT Document 12 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 77