alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 Proposed Projects *Title:*
                     The OCSE—157 Child Support Enforcement Annual Data Report. *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0177. *Description:*
                     The information obtained from this form will be used to report Child Support Enforcement activities to the Congress as required by law, to complete incentive measure and performance indicators utilized in the program, and to assist the Office of Child Support Enforcement in monitoring and evaluation State Child Support Enforcement programs. *Respondents:*
                     State, Local or Tribal Govt. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per  
                             respondent
Average burden hours per response
Total burden hoursOCSE-157
54
1
4
216Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:



216
 In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above.  Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.  Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication. Dated: November 20, 2000. Bob Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 00-29994  Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### Douglas Elliman—Gibbons & Ives, Inc., Respondent, v Michael Kellerman, Appellant.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered December 13, 1989, which, after nonjury trial, found in favor of plaintiff against defendant in the amount of $45,000, plus interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the complaint dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a real estate brokerage corporation, seeking to *363recover a commission allegedly owed by defendant, failed to submit proof at trial that it was duly licensed at the time of the transaction as required pursuant to Real Property Law § 442-d. As plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, it is unnecessary to reach the remaining issues raised on appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ. *[See, —*AD2d — (Apr. 16, 1991).]
#### Jennifer Dublin et al., Plaintiffs, v Chester Prime, Appellant, and McNeilab, Inc., Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Prime appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated June 19, 1989, as granted the cross motion of the defendant McNeilab, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the appeal must be dismissed because the appellant is not aggrieved by the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint against his codefendant, McNeilab, Inc. *(see,*CPLR 5511; *Hauser v North Rockland Cent. School Dist. No. 1,*166 AD2d 553). Eiber, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 429 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 429

Designating May 26 through 29, 1995, as ``Peruvian Institutions in the 
                    United States of America Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 1994

  Mr. Gutierrez introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Designating May 26 through 29, 1995, as ``Peruvian Institutions in the 
                    United States of America Week''.

Whereas the Peruvian Institutions in the United States of America are gathering 
        for their XI Convention to exchange ideas and experiences to promote and 
        support the institutions associated with administrative skills and 
        development;
Whereas some 1,000,000 Peruvians live in the United States of America;
Whereas the Convention will be used to pursue new ideas that will extend the 
        horizons of the institutions and work to demonstrate that the Peruvian 
        community is a vital and constructive force in American society;
Whereas this Convention will address the problems faced by Peruvian 
        institutions, Peruvian-Americans and immigrants, and will develop 
        procedures to provide scholarships to Hispanic individuals; and
Whereas the theme of the Convention will be ``Progress Through Education'' to 
        achieve success in life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 26 through 29, 1995, 
is designated as ``Peruvian Institutions in the United States Week'' 
and the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States to observe such a week 
with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 156

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the coverage of members of

Congress under health care reform legislation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Mr. BARCA of Wisconsin submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the coverage

of members of Congress under health care reform legislation.

Whereas Congress is expected to consider health care reform

legislation in the near future that would offer a standard

benefit package with several different options for the delivery of these benefits;

Whereas the standard benefits offered under all plans will be

the same, and quality standards will apply to all plans;

Whereas consumers will have the ability to choose a plan on

an annual basis, and will have access to full information

about all plans so that they may make their choice based

on the quality of plans and consumer satisfaction of

plans; and
2

•HCON 156 IH

Whereas members of Congress should be treated the same

and afforded the same choices as every American in the

health care system: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that any

3 health care reform legislation approved by Congress

4 should provide health care plans of comparable high qual5 ity and that members of Congress should participate on

6 an equal basis with all other Americans in the health care

7 system that results from health care reform legislation.

Æ
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 413

Designating November 1, 1994, as ‘‘National Family Literacy Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 22, 1994

Mr. GOODLING (for himself and Mr. SAWYER) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating November 1, 1994, as ‘‘National Family

Literacy Day’’.

Whereas millions of American families are trapped in a cycle

of poverty, dependency, and undereducation;

Whereas research shows that the most important factor in

determining the life chances of a child is the level of educational attainment of the parents of the child;

Whereas a child whose parents lack a high school diploma are

more than twice as likely to live in poverty than a child

whose parents are high school graduates;

Whereas the level of education of a parent affects the level

of literacy of the children of the parent, even when the

children become adults;
2

•HJ 413 IH

Whereas family literacy programs can increase parent involvement in the education of children of the parent;

Whereas a child in a family literacy program demonstrates

greater gains than a child in a child-focused program;

Whereas an adult participating in a family literacy program

is more likely to remain in the program than an adult

participating in an adult-focused program;

Whereas family literacy programs, such as Even Start and

Head Start, provide a promising approach to improving

the literacy skills of families; and

Whereas, if literacy is to be increased among the next generation of families, it is necessary to use family literacy programs to increase the educational skills of parents and

children of the parents: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That November 1, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Fam4 ily Literacy Day’’. The President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe this day with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
WILLIAM WALLACE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2233

Opinion filed May 27, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

William Wallace, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
# Official Journal C 105/26 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 105 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 105

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 105/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2021 to 28 February 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2021/C 105/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2021 to 28 February 2021(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 11 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 105/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2021 to 28 February 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2021/C 105/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2021 to 28 February 2021(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

11

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Ex parte NOBLE.

No. 22759.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1944.

Howard Davison, of Rotan, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Judge of the 90th District Court of Stephens County, refusing to issue the writ of habeas corpus upon appellant’s application therefor.

Such an order is not a final judgment of which this court has jurisdiction upon appeal. Ex parte Smith, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 649, 215 S.W. 299; Ex parte Sheets, 126 Tex.Cr. R. 370, 64 S.W.2d 781; Ex parte Steele, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 539, 121 S.W.2d 605; 21 Texas Jurisprudence 483.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant insists that we were in error in dismissing the appeal.

In support of the proposition that no appeal will lie from an order refusing to issue a writ of habeas corpus, we cite the following in addition to the authorities referred to in our original opinion: See cases listed in Section 243, Branch’s Ann.Tex. P. C., p. 152, and particularly Ex parte Thomas, 61 Tex.Cr.R. 573, 136 S.W. 60; Ex parte Barnett, 74 Tex.Cr.R. 136, 167 S.W. 845; also 21 Tex.Jur. p. 483, sec. 57.

In relator’s motion for rehearing he adverts to the Smith case, referred to in our original opinion as not supporting our conclusion. We are quite sure this arises from the fact that two Smith cases are reported on page 299 of 215 S.W., each involving habeas corpus proceedings. The one relied upon by us was Ex parte Mary Smith and not Ex parte Sam Smith.

Relator’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
APPLICANT ROBERT LEE WALLACE APPLICATION NO. 77,904-02 

APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 

ACTION TAKEN
Case 2:22-cv-00184-Z-BR Document 13 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
Agenda – February 2018 Refunding

Treasury Dealer Meetings – January 25 – January 26, 2018

Dealer ___________________

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, January 22, 2018 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov and NY.QTR@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this 

quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates

Central

Estimate

Range that would not 

surprise you

Low/High

January-March 2018 /

 Ending Cash Balance /

April-June 2018 /

 Ending Cash Balance /

FY 2018 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

FY 2019 Total Net Marketable Borrowing /

FY 2020 Total Net Marketable Borrowing /

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

FY 2018 /

FY 2019 /

FY 2020 /

Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2018 /

Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2019 /

Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2018 /

Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2019 /

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates

3-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / /

10-year note (Feb) /

10-year note reopening (Mar/Apr) / / - /

30-year bond (Feb) /

30-year bond reopening (Mar/Apr) / /

2-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / /

5-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / /

7-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / /

30-year TIPS (Feb) /

10-year TIPS reopening (Mar) /

5-year TIPS (Apr) /

2-year FRN reopening (Feb/Mar) /

2-year FRN (Apr) /

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill size (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

Total change in bills outstanding 2/18 - 4/18 /

Total change in bills outstanding FY 2018 /

CMB issuance Feb ‘18 – Apr ‘18 (size/date) / / / /

Discussion Topics

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2018 and FY2019. Do you believe the current financing 

schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s financing needs though the end of FY2018? FY2019? 

2. Given the concentration of auction settlements on Thursdays (particularly if the mid- or end-of-month coupon settlements 

fall on a Thursday) please comment on the potential advantages and disadvantages to having some Treasury bill 

maturities (including a potential new bill tenor, such as a 2-month) settle and mature outside of the typical Thursday-toThursday cycle. Also, please comment on the potential demand for a 2-month bill tenor. What effect would a 2-month 

bill have on pricing and liquidity of other T-bill tenors? 

3. Please discuss the drivers of fails-to-deliver (fails) in the Treasury securities market and the impact of these fails on 

market functioning. Should Treasury consider any actions to alleviate fails such as increasing the offering size of new

issues relative to the size of reopenings. Please discuss any other actions that Treasury should consider to reduce fails in 

the Treasury funding markets.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daryl Jones, Also Known as Darryl Jones, Appellant.

Judgment, Ssupreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered January 13, 1989, convicting defendant, after a *399jury trial, of assault in the second degree, petit larceny, and criminal tampering in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of from 3 to 6 years on the assault count and one year on the other two counts, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant argues that he was denied a fair trial when on summation the prosecutor stated, *inter alia,*that the officers had no motive to lie. These remarks were either unpreserved for appellate review or were responsive to defendant’s summation. Furthermore, we find no abuse of discretion in sentencing defendant. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch and Wallach, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MAISHA SYKES, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00794-O-BP

 § 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Request for a Court Appointed Attorney to Review Joint 

Report filed December 16, 2022. ECF No. 40. After review of the pleadings and applicable legal 

authorities, the Court DENIES the Motion.

There is no automatic right to the appointment of counsel in a civil action filed by a litigant 

proceeding pro se. E.g. Hulsey v. State of Tex., 929 F.2d 168, 172 (5th Cir. 1991); Freeze v. 

Griffith, 849 F.2d 172, 175 (5th Cir. 1988); Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 

1982). However, where a case presents exceptional circumstances, counsel may be appointed. 

Ulmer, 691 F.2d at 212–13. In determining whether exceptional circumstances exist and whether 

the court in its discretion should appoint counsel in such a case, the following factors are relevant: 

(1) the type and complexity of the case; 

(2) whether the plaintiff is capable of adequately representing himself; 

(3) the plaintiff's ability to adequately investigate and present his case; 

(4) the presence of evidence which consists largely of conflicting testimony so as 

to require skill in the presentation of evidence and in cross-examination; and, 

Case 4:22-cv-00794-O-BP Document 41 Filed 12/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 289
2

(5) the likelihood that appointment will benefit the plaintiff, the court, and the 

defendants by shortening the trial and assisting in a just determination. 

Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubbock Cty., Tex., 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1991); Ulmer, 691 F.2d at 

213. 

Review of Plaintiff’s pleadings and motions reveals that she has adequately presented the 

operative facts underlying her claims for relief. Her issues are understandable, and her command 

of the English language is sufficient. The motions filed by Plaintiff further reflect a sufficient

understanding of Court procedures. Thus, Plaintiff seems capable of adequately representing 

herself in this litigation. Moreover, there are no complex issues of fact or law which would require 

the skill of an attorney to litigate. At the present time, it does not appear likely that appointment 

of counsel will shorten the litigation process, nor will it assist in a just resolution of the complaint. 

Although Plaintiff has a difficult burden to meet, all pro se plaintiffs who bring civil actions 

face a similar challenge. Plaintiff filed this case without being represented by an attorney and has 

prosecuted the case since then without one. The Court concludes that she has failed to establish 

exceptional circumstances that would warrant appointment of counsel at this time. 

It is so ORDERED on December 19, 2022.

______________________________________

Hal R. Ray, Jr.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00794-O-BP Document 41 Filed 12/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 290