alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Summary of Stakeholder Comments By Topic **(Emergency Response )** 



### Stakeholder: State of Michigan **Topic:** Modify SQG requirements Comment: Modify some of the emergency response requirements for SQGs, such as making arrangements with local authorities.(40 CFR 262.34) 

### . Stakeholder: ESS Group Topic: Control of hazardous waste spills by SQGs Comment: **40 CFR 262.34(d)(5)(iv)(B).** This regulation requires that **small quantity generators** contain the flow and clean up hazardous waste spills. If such a spill wo uld be considered to be an emergency under OSHA ’ s regulations in 29 CFR 1910.120, the ability to contain the spill would require a minimum of 8 hours of initial training with an annual refresher. If the response taken is offensive in nature, the ability to respond w ould require a minimum of 24 hours of initial training with an annual refresher. From a practical standpoint, most small quantity generators would hire a spill cleanup contractor to provide such services if needed rather than train employees to p erform the response, however the regulations in 40 CFR 262.34(d)(5)(iv)(B) do not seem to allow such a choice. **We recommend that the language be revised to state that the generator is responsible for ensuring these things occur, rather than having them** **res ponsible for perform**  **ing the tasks. Stakeholder: ESS Group**  **Topic:** Clean

- up notification process to states and local authorities **Comment: 40 CFR 265.55(i)** . For most incidents, the requirement to notify state, local, and federal authorities prior to resumi ng operations in the affected area is burdensome with little benefit. **We suggest that revising the requirement to ensure that 40 CFR 265.55(h) is com**  **plied with prior to resuming operations is adequate for generators.**  **Stakeholder: ESS Group Topic:**  Reco rdkeeping of spills **Comment: 40 CFR 265.55(j).** This section requires that information related to an incident be recorded in the **facility ’**  **s operating record.** Generators are not required to keep an operating record of the facility. We suggest that this sec tion be revised to require only that this information be maintained onsite for generators. 

### 2 commenters; 4 comments
Union Calendar No. 92

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 208

[Report No. 103–167]

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory

products of the People’s Republic of China.treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the

JULY 1, 1993

Reported adversely, committed to the Committee of the

to be printedWhole House on the State of the Union and ordered
IB

Union Calendar No. 92

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 208

[Report No. 103–167]

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favorednation treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. APPLEGATE, and Mr. KING) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

JULY 1, 1993

Additional sponsors: Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, and Ms.

MOLINARI

JULY 1, 1993

Reported adversely, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the

People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HJ 208 RH

1 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

2 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

3 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

4 May 28, 1993, with respect to the People’s Republic of

5 China.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 351 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 351

Designating May 22 through May 28, 1994, as ``In Celebration of America 
                                Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 1994

   Mr. Calvert introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Designating May 22 through May 28, 1994, as ``In Celebration of America 
                                Week''.

Whereas the purpose of the designation made by this joint resolution is to 
        promote among students a conscious and constructive understanding that 
        America is made up of people from diverse ethnic, racial, cultural, 
        linguistic, and religious backgrounds, yet are united as Americans by 
        the ideals and principles of democracy that are contained in the United 
        States Constitution and Bill of Rights and the Declaration of 
        Independence;
Whereas the week's activities should build toward the observance of Memorial 
        Day, honoring Americans of all backgrounds who gave their lives so that 
        future generations could enjoy the blessings of the Declaration of 
        Independence and the United States Constitution; and
Whereas it is intended that this week of celebration include activities at each 
        school site that reflect this theme, utilize district and community 
        resources, and are incorporated into the social studies curriculum: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 22 through 28, 1994, 
is designated as ``In Celebration of America Week'', and the President 
is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe such week with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 327 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 327

         To designate June 4, 1994, as ``National Trails Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1994

 Mr. Schaefer (for himself, Mr. Vento, Mr. Beilenson, Mr. Bevill, Mr. 
Boucher, Ms. Dunn, Mr. Costello, Mr. Farr of California, Mr. Foglietta, 
Ms. Furse, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Kasich, Mr. Kleczka, 
  Mr. Klein, Mr. Markey, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Moran, Mrs. Morella, Mr. 
 McInnis, Mr. Miller of California, Mr. Murtha, Mrs. Mink, Mr. Neal of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, Mr. Regula, Mr. Slattery, Mr. Synar, 
   Mr. Thomas of Wyoming, Mrs. Unsoeld, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. 
    Underwood) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
         To designate June 4, 1994, as ``National Trails Day''.

Whereas trails and footpaths have been an integral part of America's history, 
        providing opportunities for recreation, exercise, and transportation;
Whereas trails provide an alternative transportation system at both local and 
        metropolitan levels;
Whereas trails offer outdoor activity for the millions of Americans who walk, 
        bicycle, ride, backpack, ski, and hunt;
Whereas, by the year 2000, more than 80 percent of the Nation's population will 
        reside in urban areas and recreational opportunities which are close to 
        home will be a priority;
Whereas trails enrich our Nation's communities by showcasing areas of scenic 
        beauty, historic significance, and ecological diversity;
Whereas in 1993 over 750,000 people participated in ``National Trails Day'' 
        events across the country;
Whereas an organized trails system contributes to the economic vitality of a 
        community;
Whereas trails provide educational opportunities for all ages to observe nature 
        and to increase awareness about and appreciation of our natural 
        environment; and
Whereas a ``National Trails Day'' will strengthen support for our national 
        trails system on local, State, and national levels: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That June 4, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Trails Day''. The President is authorized and 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-230-Y 

 § 

RICO MARION (2) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED October 27, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00230-Y Document 58 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 131
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  September 30,  2005,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Wei Ru Qing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



/s/ Wei Ru Qing

By: Wei Ru Qing

Chief Financial Officer

November 21, 2005
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 62-3 Filed 09/08/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 874
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 62-3 Filed 09/08/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 875
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 62-3 Filed 09/08/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 876
Exhibit A to Sept. 8, 2022 N. Cherry Declaration 

Sample 1:

Can I hold my order until the injunction protects your customers as well please? If not please 

cancel the order....

I'm sorry sir we can not hold the order. ...... We will issue you a refund. Thanks for your 

understanding and continued support

Ok i understand I will watch for any changes to the injunction and place the order 

then.

Sample 2:

Does the new 'ruling' keep you from selling 80%'s as we now know them?

Sample 3:

I’m looking for some clarification. I’ve bought lowers from you recently and am looking to get 

more. My understanding is that on August 24th the new “Ghost Gun” law take effect. Does the 

require 80 lowers to Be serialized or are they out right banned. Thank you for any help

Sample 4:

i loved doing business with your company, I know you stopped shipping to California, but now 

all 80s are on hold? 

Sample 5:

Are you guys going to offer any variance work when the new 80 law takes effect? I buy a lot of 

my lowers from yall to make my rifles, I mill and engrave them accordingly here but since the 

new law won't allow the sale of unserielized 80s I won't be able to do my own engraving on 

them. I would prefer to keep buying them from yall

Thanks

Sample 6:

Are you able to sell 80 percent receivers to federally licensed manufacturers? I am federally 

licensed manufacturer and would still like to buy some of your 80percents.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 62-3 Filed 09/08/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 877
Sample 7: 

I’ve got a serious question...are you guys interpreting the new rule to mean that if you machine 

out the magazine well, then you’ve created a firearm that needs to be serialized? I ask because 

I’ve read through the new rule as published in the national register, and the way I interpret it if 

you don’t machine any critical features (I’m taking that as the FCG pocket) AND don’t put any 

indicator marks on the lower to show where to machine, AND don’t include instructions, AND 

don’t include fixturing/jigs, THEN the lower is NOT a firearm...

Sample 8: 

Do you still sell you jigs for your 1911 Recon 80% frames. I have several of your frames I have 

purchased earlier from you but I can no longer find my jig

Sample 9:

I’m looking for a jig for my 80% A.R. 15 lowers

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 62-3 Filed 09/08/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 878
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANGELO DIVISION

ROBERT SCHELSKE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III,

United States Secretary of Defense, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 6:22-cv-0049-H

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

Defendants respectfully notify the Court of the decision in Alvarado v. Austin, No. 23-1419

(4th Cir. Aug. 3, 2023) (attached as Ex. 1). In that case, 42 military chaplains serving in the Army, 

Air Force, and Navy challenged the military’s COVID-19 vaccination requirement and brought 

claims under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the First Amendment, and other authorities. 

The district court denied a motion for preliminary injunction and dismissed the case for lack of 

justiciability. On appeal after briefing from the parties on mootness, the Court of Appeals for the 

Fourth Circuit found the case was moot in its entirety, vacated all of the district court’s orders, and 

remanded with instructions for the district court to dismiss the case as moot.

This opinion provides additional authority in support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, ECF No. 105. 

* * *

Case 6:22-cv-00049-H Document 136 Filed 08/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2796
2

Dated: August 3, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

ALEXANDER K. HAAS

Branch Director

JOSHUA E. GARDNER

Special Counsel

 /s/ Keri L. Berman

ANDREW E. CARMICHAEL

Senior Trial Counsel

KERI L. BERMAN

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

1100 L Street NW, Rm. 11206

Washington, D.C. 20530

Tel.: (202) 514-3183 / Fax: (202) 305-7538

Email: keri.l.berman@usdoj.gov

Counsel for Defendants

Case 6:22-cv-00049-H Document 136 Filed 08/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2797
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: March 24, 2023

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, press@treasury.gov

READOUT: Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting on 

March 24, 2023

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen convened a meeting of 

the Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive session by videoconference.

During the meeting, the Council heard a presentation from staff of the Federal Reserve Bank of 

New York on market developments. The Council discussed current conditions in the banking 

sector and noted that while some institutions have come under stress, the U.S. banking system 

remains sound and resilient. The Council also discussed ongoing efforts at member agencies to 

monitor financial developments.

In attendance at the Council meeting by videoconference were the following members: 

• Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury (Chairperson of the Council)

• Jerome H. Powell, Chair, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

• Michael J. Hsu, Acting Comptroller of the Currency

• Rohit Chopra, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

• Gary Gensler, Chair, Securities and Exchange Commission

• Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

• Rostin Behnam, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

• Sandra L. Thompson, Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency

• Todd M. Harper, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration

• Thomas Workman, Independent Member with Insurance Expertise

• James Martin, Acting Director, Office of Financial Research (non-voting member)

• Steven Seitz, Director, Federal Insurance Office (non-voting member)

• Elizabeth K. Dwyer, Superintendent of Financial Services, Rhode Island Department of 

Business Regulation (non-voting member)

• Adrienne A. Harris, Superintendent, New York State Department of Financial Services

(non-voting member)
• Melanie Lubin, Securities Commissioner, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, 

Securities Division (non-voting member)

Additional information regarding the Council and its work is available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 1 of 22 PageID 1
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 2 of 22 PageID 2
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 3 of 22 PageID 3
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 4 of 22 PageID 4
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 5 of 22 PageID 5
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 6 of 22 PageID 6
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 7 of 22 PageID 7
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 8 of 22 PageID 8
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 9 of 22 PageID 9
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 10 of 22 PageID 10
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 11 of 22 PageID 11
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 12 of 22 PageID 12
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 13 of 22 PageID 13
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 14 of 22 PageID 14
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 15 of 22 PageID 15
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 16 of 22 PageID 16
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 17 of 22 PageID 17
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 18 of 22 PageID 18
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 19 of 22 PageID 19
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 20 of 22 PageID 20
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 21 of 22 PageID 21
Case 5:22-cv-00097-H Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 22 of 22 PageID 22
**To All Treasury Department Mentor-Protégé Participants:**

**Participants of the Treasury Department’s Mentor-Protégé program are required to submit an annual evaluation to the Mentor-Protégé Program Manager.  Forms must be submitted by the Mentor and Protégé firms individually.  The Mentor firm must indicate developmental assistance provided, and the Protégé firm must indicate the developmental assistance received. The report must reflect the names of both the Mentor and Protégé firms.  Please check the box indicating that you are the Mentor or Protégé firm submitting the report.**

**Please use the format below to submit your evaluation detailing accomplishments under the Mentor-Protégé agreement over the past year.   Feel free to include any additional information you deem necessary.**

**Also, please submit requests to extend your Mentor Protégé agreements (for an additional 6 months to a year) separately from your annual report.  Please be reminded that extensions must be submitted prior to the expiration date of the agreement.  The report and requests for extension should be submitted to:**

**Brian Watson**

**U.S. Department of the Treasury**

**Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization**

**Email:****Brian.Watson@treasury.gov**

**Mobile: 240.840.6198**

**NOTE:  Please reference Annual M/P Evaluation in subject line of email**

**Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.**

**ANNUAL MENTOR-PROTÉGÉ EVALUATION**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

          - 48 CFR Part 215

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Director of Defense Procurement is sponsoring a public meeting to discuss the proposed Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) rule on changes to profit policy published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at 65 FR 45574 on July 24, 2000. The Director of Defense Procurement would like to hear the views of interested parties on what they believe to be the key issues pertaining to the proposed rule and potential alternatives. A listing of some of the possible issues is included on the Internet Home Page of the Office of Cost, Pricing, and Finance at                         *http://www.acq.osd.mil/​dp/​cpf.*

Subsequent to the discussions at the public meeting, the Director of Defense Procurement intends to publish a revised proposed rule for additional public comment. 

# DATES:

The public meeting will be conducted at the address shown below on December 12, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., local time. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        The public meeting will be conducted at Crystal Square 4, Suite                               ( print page 69896)                            200A, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bob Bemben, Office of Cost, Pricing, and Finance, by telephone at (703) 695-9764; by FAX at (703) 693-9616; or by e-mail at                         *bembenrj@acq.osd.mil.*

Michele P. Peterson,

Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.

[FR Doc. 00-29776  Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
THE ATTOWSEP GENER,IL 

OF TESAS 

OPINION fi O-6812 

- _ 

WAS NEVER ISSUED OR 

WAS WITHDRAWN. 

.