alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$9,000.00	August 27, 2015


 


 


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE RECEIPT
AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS ACKNOWLEDGED, ASN Technologies, Inc. ("Maker") hereby promises to pay to the order of
CC Fund LLC ("Holder") at Las Vegas, Nevada, or at such other place as Holder shall designate, the sum o1 nine thousand
United States Dollars ($9,000.00) with interest at the rate of eight percent (6.0%) per annum until paid.


 


All accrued interest and principal shall be
due and payable at the sooner of (i) ninety days from written demand by Holder delivered via first class US mail to the address
below, or (ii) two years from the date of this Note.


 


If not so paid and at the option of Holder,
or its assigns, all principal and interest, shall become immediately due and payable without notice.


 


This Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part,
at any time and without penalty.


 


Interest shall be computed on the basis of
a 365-day year or 366-day year as applicable, and actual days lapsed. Maker shall have the privilege of prepaying the principal
under this Note in whole or in pa1t, without penalty or premium at any time. All payments hereunder shall be applied first to interest,
then to principal.


 


All parties to this Note hereby waive presentment,
dishonor, notice of dishonor and protest. All parties hereto consent to, and Holder is hereby expressly authorized to make, without
notice, any and all renewals, extensions, modifications or waivers of the time for or the terms of payment of any sum or sums due
hereunder, or under any documents or Instruments relating to or securing this Note, or of the performance of any covenants, conditions
or agreements hereof or thereof or the taking or release of collateral securing this Note. Any such action taken by Holder shall
not discharge the liability of any party to this Note.


 


This Note shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada without regard to conflict of law principles. Maker shall also pay Holder any
and all costs of collection incurred in connection with this Note, including court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.


 


MAKER


 


ASN Technologies


Address: 10291 S. 1300E #118, Sandy, UT 84094


 


By: /s/ Daniel Davis


Daniel Davis


Its: President and CEO
Order entered March 25, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00144-CV

No. 05-21-00145-CV

SAMIR DAOUDI, Appellant

V.

ABDULRHMAN M. KLALIB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. DC-19-20481 and DC-20-17213

ORDER

By notice of appeal filed February 25, 2021, appellant challenges the trial 

court’s November 13, 2020 combined summary judgment and severance order as 

well as the trial court’s “failure to rule” on appellant’s motion for reconsideration. 

The November 13th combined order granted summary judgment in favor of 

appellee on all of appellant’s claims against appellee and severed those claims 

from appellant’s claims against others. The order was entered in the original 

cause, trial court cause number DC-19-20481 which on appeal is cause number 05-
21-00144-CV, and the severed claims were assigned trial court cause number DC20-17213 which on appeal is cause number 05-21-00145-CV.

Although appellant filed a single notice of appeal, he included both trial 

court cause numbers, resulting in these two appeals. However, the relevant trial 

court and appellate cause numbers are DC-20-17213, as that is the trial court cause 

the severed claims at issue on appeal were assigned, and 05-21-00145-CV. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellate cause number 05-21-00144-CV closed for 

administrative purposes and DENY as moot all pending motions in that cause. 

Because the clerk’s record in that cause contains items not included in the clerk’s 

record in appellate cause number 05-21–00145-CV, we DIRECT the Clerk of the 

Court to transfer the clerk’s record in cause number 05-21-00144-CV into cause 

number 05-21-00145-CV. The parties shall now use only cause number 05-21-

00145-CV when referencing the appeal.

We note the notice of appeal filed in cause number 05-21-00145-CV was 

filed untimely but within the grace period provided in Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 26.3. However, no motion for extension of time to file the notice of 

appeal has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Accordingly, we DIRECT

appellant to file, no later than April 5, 2021, a motion for extension of time that 

complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b). See id. 10.5(b), 26.3. 

Pending the filing of the motion, the deadline for filing appellant’s brief is 
suspended, and the Court will take no action on appellant’s first motion for 

extension of time to file brief and appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal.

We caution appellant that failure to file the requested motion for extension 

of time to file notice of appeal may result in dismissal of the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of 

McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on 

reh’g) (timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional).

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Seneca Foods Corporation, Petitioner, v Thomas C. Jorling, as Commissioner of State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Respondent.

Determination (denominated order) unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner Seneca Food Corporation owns food-processing *968plants in East Williamson and Marion, Wayne County, New York, for which the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) issued State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permits authorizing the discharge of certain levels of industrial effluent into certain tributaries and into the groundwater. DEC alleged in its amended complaint that on five occasions petitioner discharged unauthorized industrial waste from its Marion and East Williamson facilities in violation of ECL articles 11 and 17 and the SPDES permits. After a hearing, respondent found that petitioner had committed the violations alleged in the amended complaint and assessed a penalty of $46,000. Petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding which was transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g).

Initially, we find no merit to petitioner’s assertion that DEC willfully and deliberately failed to comply with petitioner’s disclosure demand, and thus dismissal of the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 is not warranted. The DEC has not adopted the provisions of CPLR 3126 into its adjudicatory process nor is it required to do so *(see,*State Administrative Procedure Act § 305; *Matter of Heim v Regan,*90 AD2d 656, 657). Consequently, that provision is not applicable to this administrative proceeding. In any event, CPLR 3126 requires a willful refusal by the party from whom disclosure is requested before preclusion, dismissal or sanctions will be ordered *(see, Queens Farms Dairy v Consolidated Edison Co.,*63 AD2d 696, 698).

Petitioner’s argument that the Administrative Law Judge improperly admitted exhibit 52 into evidence because it had not been properly identified or authenticated as a record kept in the general course of its business is without merit. Exhibit 52 was a table of self-monitoring water discharge data identified by petitioner’s attorney as a company record which petitioner was required by law to prepare, maintain and submit to DEC.

Finally, we conclude that respondent’s determination that petitioner was guilty of violating its SPDES permits, various provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, as alleged in the amended complaint, is supported by substantial evidence. The testimony of the several DEC employees, largely uncontroverted, established that the violations occurred *(see, Matter of Haines v Flacke,*104 AD2d 26, 31). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, *969Cicoria, J.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
James R. McAuliffe, President and Chief Executive Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)       
          The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2007, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
          The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp,
          Inc.

|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By: /s/ James R. McAuliffe      
      James R. McAuliffeIts:   President and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,270
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,678
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        998
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,529
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,476
<LOANS>                                        127,840
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,604
<DEPOSITS>                                     120,929
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,693
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,461
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 154,604
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,016
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   76
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   382
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,474
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,647
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,827
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      273
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    618
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         618
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       364
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.91
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,351
<LOANS-PAST>                                       252
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    247
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   925
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,202
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,202
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 191

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor

of Joyce Kilmer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1993

Mrs. BYRNE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage

stamp in honor of Joyce Kilmer.

Whereas Joyce Kilmer inspired lovers of poetry the world

over through his positive prose;

Whereas Joyce Kilmer, a symbol of twentieth century American culture, has enriched the art of poetry;

Whereas Joyce Kilmer authored countless poems that hold

fast in many memories which ring true to this day;

Whereas he valiantly served his country during World War I,

first as a volunteer in the Sixty-Ninth Regiment, United

States Army National Guard;
2

HJ 191 IH

Whereas he served as a member of the ‘‘Irish Brigade,’’

which had a long and rich line of service in the history

of our nation and was among the first to battle in

France;

Whereas Joyce Kilmer, struck by the tragedy of the sinking

of the Lusitania on May 7, 1915, opined in one of his

greatest poems ‘‘The White Ships and the Red,’’ the sorrow and the tragedy that is war;

Whereas Joyce Kilmer, at his request, was transferred to the

Regimental Intelligence Section and bravely served with

distinction as a scout on the front lines;

Whereas Joyce Kilmer was awarded Croix de Guerre for

bravery under fire;

Whereas Joyce Kilmer, poet laureate and defender of freedom, died in action, July 30, 1918; and

Whereas Joyce Kilmer’s appreciation for peace, nature and

love, as most widely recognized in his sonnet entitled

‘‘Trees,’’ served to underscore the innocence and beauty

that symbolized a freedom-loving America: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Postmaster General shall issue a commemorative

4 stamp in honor of Joyce Kilmer. Such a stamp shall be

5 issued and sold for such period as the Postmaster General

6 shall determine.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 408 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 408

  To designate June 11, 1995, as ``D-Day Widows and Orphans National 
                           Recognition Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1994

   Mr. Quillen introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate June 11, 1995, as ``D-Day Widows and Orphans National 
                           Recognition Day''.

Whereas, on June 6, 1944, American and Allied forces began their assault on the 
        armies of Nazi Germany in Normandy, France, during World War II;
Whereas this D-Day invasion was the largest amphibious assault in the history of 
        warfare;
Whereas over 9,000 brave American servicemen gave their lives in the D-Day 
        campaign so that Europe might again be free; and
Whereas the noble sacrifice made by these soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines 
        left their loved ones at home in the United States to mourn their loss: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That June 11, 1995, is 
designated as a day to honor the widows, children, and other family 
members of American servicemen who gave their lives in the D-Day 
invasion of Normandy, and the President is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe such day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALISHA GAMBRELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 422 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALISHA GAMBRELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 423 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,988
<SECURITIES>                                     4,083
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,365
<PP&E>                                          20,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           284
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,132
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,701
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 136278 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 136278 COA: 273445 Wayne CC: 05-008492-01 TANEICA ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 18, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
From: Patrick Kelly <kellyp@api.org>

To: Julia MacAllister/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: OTAQ@EPA

Date: 02/14/2013 01:23 PM

Subject: Request for Public Hearing EPA-HQ-2012-0546

Julia, 

API requests a public hearing be held regarding the Proposed Rule published in the Federal Register on 

February 7th titled: Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: 2013 Renewable Fuel Standards (Docket ID No. 

EPA-HQ-2012-0546). 

Please provide your acknowledgement that this note meets the requirements for a request for a 

hearing; otherwise please inform me of the proper protocol. 

Regards, 

Patrick Kelly 

Senior Policy Advisor 

(202) 682-8192

www.api.org
Addressing research copyright concerns

Issues:

(a) By law copyright protections cannot be placed on the work of an officer or employee of 

the U.S. Government (see 17 U.S.C. 105 and 17 U.S.C. 101). 

(b) Most peer-reviewed academic journals require authors to release copy rights. 

(c) Many in the PME community are concerned that their faculty therefore cannot publish 

their research in any journals with this requirement.

Course of Action:

OSD Policy discussed these issues and concerns with OSD OGC (Associate General Counsel 

Richard Gray, their intellectual property SME), OSD Research and Engineering within OSD 

AT&L, the Defense Technical Information Center or DTIC (the main central repository for 

DoD-generated and DoD-funded research and engineering information), and The MIT Press

(publisher of International Security (IS), a top international relations journal). 

From all sources we determined that it is standard practice for all academic and technical journals 

(in the social sciences and physical sciences alike) to include a government employee 

exemption clause to any copyright requirements. Be aware, this exemption is not always clearly 

presented to the submitting researcher, and every journal appears to state and implement the 

policy in its own way.

Example exemption clauses:

• Publication Agreement for International Security :

Concerning U.S. (Federal) Government Employees: 

Some of the foregoing grants and warranties will not apply if the Article was written by 

U.S. Government employees acting within the scope of their employment. If you are a 

U.S. Government employee who prepared this work as part of your official duties and 

there is no copyright to transfer, please check this box ___. Works produced by 

individuals employed under government contracts are protected and restricted under U.S. 

copyright law. However, if you are a contractor of the U.S. Government, you may reserve 

the right to reproduce the Article for U.S. government purposes by checking this box ___.

• Elsevier (publisher of over 2,500 journals) has specific publishing agreements with 

certain government and inter-governmental organizations for their employee authors. For 

US Government employees, works created within the scope of their employment are 

considered to be public domain and Elsevier's publishing agreements do not require a 

transfer or license of rights for such works.

Conclusion and Recommendation: 

Most if not all academic journals accept article submissions from U.S. Government employees, 

acknowledging that government works are in the public domain even in cases where transfer of 

the copyright is otherwise required. If a PME faculty member encounters a journal that declines 

an article submission on the basis of copyright requirements (that cannot be overcome via the 

government employee exemption clause), contact OSD Policy (LTC Stephanie Ahern, 

stephanie.r.ahern.mil@mail.mil) who will work with OGC and others to try to help resolve the 

issue.