alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of FY 2014 Increases and Decreases

(Dollars in Thousands)

 Offsetting Fees/ Total, Treasury

 Fiscal Cancellations/ Appropriations

 DO DSCIP OIG TIGTA SIGTARP CDFI FinCEN TTB Service IRS Total Rescissions Committee

FY 2013 Annualized CR $310,275 $0 $29,822 $152,624 $42,056 $222,353 $111,466 $100,489 $393,836 $11,887,741 $13,250,662 ($951,000) $12,299,662 

Non-Recur CR Increase ($1,887) $0 ($181) ($928) ($256) ($1,353) ($678) ($611) ($2,396) ($71,045) ($79,335) $0 ($79,335)

Pay-Raise Adjustment $1,678 $0 $196 $1,104 $240 $81 $407 $507 $2,437 $79,673 $86,323 $0 $86,323 

Non-Pay Inflation $1,985 $0 $87 $498 $193 $185 $899 $641 $1,791 $46,001 $52,280 $0 $52,280 

Efficiency Savings ($14,441) $0 ($325) ($2,745) $0 ($1,353) ($6,040) ($2,815) ($48,952) ($254,864) ($331,535) $0 ($331,535)

Transfers ($1,800) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 

Other $0 $0 ($1,048) $4,500 ($7,390) $0 ($2,145) ($2,000) $0 $0 ($8,083) $0 ($8,083)

Adjustments to Base ($14,465) $0 ($1,271) $2,429 ($7,213) ($2,440) ($7,557) ($4,278) ($45,320) ($200,235) ($280,350) $0 ($280,350)

FY 2014 Base $295,810 $0 $28,551 $155,053 $34,843 $219,913 $103,909 $96,211 $348,516 $11,687,506 $12,970,312 ($951,000) $12,019,312 

Program Decreases ($1,435) $0 $0 ($5,515) $0 ($11,302) $0 ($5,000) ($5,591) $0 ($28,843) $0 ($28,843)

Program Reinvestments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $11,740 $37,500 $49,240 $0 $49,240 

Program Increases $17,400 $2,725 $2,800 $0 $80 $16,325 $0 $5,000 $5,500 $1,136,027 $1,185,857 $0 $1,185,857 

Subtotal, Program Changes $15,965 $2,725 $2,800 ($5,515) $80 $5,023 $0 $0 $11,649 $1,173,527 $1,206,254 $0 $1,206,254 

Change to Offsetting Fees/Cancellations/Rescissions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $1,000 

FY 2014 President's Budget $311,775 $2,725 $31,351 $149,538 $34,923 $224,936 $103,909 $96,211 $360,165 $12,861,033 $14,176,566 ($950,000) $13,226,566 

2/ Total resources for FY 2014 includes a $950 million Forfeiture Fund cancellation. 

3/ Total Efficiency Savings for Treasury is $354 million. BEP and Mint savings of $22 million is not reflected.

1/ Total resources for FY 2013 include $1 million in projected Legacy Treasury Direct user fee collections and a $950 million Forfeiture Fund rescission.
# C_2018224EN.01000101.xml

| 27.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2016-2017 SESSION

Sittings of 21 to 24 November 2016

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 352, 19.10.2017
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 352, 19.10.2017

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sitting of 30 November and 1 December 2016

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 363, 26.10.2017
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 363, 26.10.2017

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2015-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2016.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of March, 2017.

 

----

 
| March 29,   2017 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   |
|                  | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|                  | Name:  | Brett D. Davis |
|                  | Title: | President |

 

----
### steam

_ record - Re: ICR Extension Request

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

-----"Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearm outh@mirant.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Wearmouth, Ann" <a nn.wearmouth@mirant.com>

Date: 07/09/2010 10:08AM 

### From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov>

To: "Wearmouth, Ann" <a nn.wearmouth@mirant.com>

Date: 7/13/2010 6:07 AM

Sub j ect: Re: ICR Extension Request

Attachments: ICR Extension Request.PDF Pa g e 1 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0293DO

...Subject: ICR Extension Request

I’ve attached a letter that was also mailed from our offices today requesting an extension to file the ICR for our Dickerson,

Morgantown and Chalk Point Generating Stations. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to e

‐ mail or phone me.

Regards, Ann

ann wearmouth

environmental engineer

mirant mid-atlantic, llc

(301) 955-9028 

### Pa g e 2 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0293DO

...
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 7 /2 9 /1 5 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the Infocast EPA Clean Power Plan

Implementation Summit
**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at the Infocast EPA Clean P ower Plan Implementation Summit in Atlanta, GA, on March 31 , 2015 . The Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was p roposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Carol Kemker /EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Approximately 2 5 p articipants
# L_2006401EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 401/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 401/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

From 1 January 2007, the structure of the Official Journal will be modified in the direction of a clearer classification of the acts published which preserves, nevertheless, essential continuity.

The new structure, with examples illustrating its use in the classification of acts, can be consulted on the EUR-Lex site on the following address:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm

---
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2015-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2018 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2018.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 25th day of March, 2019.

 
| March 25, 2019 |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |   |
|                | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|                | Name:  | Brett D. Davis |
|                | Title: | President |

 

----
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL DARNELL JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

CODE ENFORCEMENT 

BUSINESS, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1907-X-BT

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. [Doc. No. 21]. Plaintiff Michael Darnell Jones, 

proceeding pro se, filed an amended complaint that contains no factual allegations

and, in response to the Magistrate Judge’s questionnaire, stated that the various 

defendants violated 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 through “character assassination, racial, 

civil rights contempt and disrespect, [and] characterizing.”

1 As to each defendant, 

the Magistrate Judge found that Jones failed to state a claim upon which relief can 

be granted and recommended that the Court sua sponte dismiss the case. Because 

Jones already filed two complaints and responded to the questionnaire, the 

Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing with prejudice.

1 Doc. 18 at 2–3.

Case 3:22-cv-01907-X-BT Document 25 Filed 04/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 157
2

Jones filed an objection.

2 In his objection, Jones discusses the standard for 

treating Rule 12(b)(6) motions as motions for summary judgment, but that standard 

is inapplicable here. Jones adds the conclusory assertion that he “was denied the 

rights of due process” but does not elaborate as to how.

3 Jones’ objection fails to 

refute any of the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, or recommendations.

The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, 

conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the 

remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. 

Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court DISMISSES WITH 

PREJUDICE all of Jones’ claims against all defendants. The Court DISMISSES 

AS MOOT Jones’ pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2023.

____________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2 Doc. 22.

3 Id. at 6. Jones’ objection also indicates that Jones intended to use it to “file motions for 

defamation,” as well as “motions of exten[s]ion of time,” “motions to prove [his] case,” and “motions 

[for] the rights of due process of law.” Id. at 9–10. Even if Jones could file such motions at this stage 

and as an addendum to his objection, those motions would be moot in light of the Court’s ruling.

Case 3:22-cv-01907-X-BT Document 25 Filed 04/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 158
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000941914
<NAME>                        Smithway Motor Xpress Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars
  
       
<S>                           <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1.0
<CASH>                        2851
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 16362
<ALLOWANCES>                  82
<INVENTORY>                   1247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              22617
<PP&E>                        89037
<DEPRECIATION>                24541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                91576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         12014
<BONDS>                       37904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      50
<OTHER-SE>                    32183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  91576
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              74226
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 69337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1182
<INCOME-PRETAX>               3707
<INCOME-TAX>                  1543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           2164
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  2164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.43
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 373 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 373

    Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-
 favored-nation treatment) to the products of the People's Republic of 
                     China, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1994

   Mr. Solomon introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-
 favored-nation treatment) to the products of the People's Republic of 
                     China, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
approve the extension of the authority contained in section 402(c) of 
the Trade Act of 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on 
June 2, 1994, with respect to the People's Republic of China.

                                 <all>
```
Stipulation of Dismissal – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

LAURA MARCELA ROSE-DODD

379 Buff Cap Rd. 

Tolland, Connecticut 06084

Plaintiff,

v.

U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND 

IMMIGRATION SERVICES,

5900 Capital Gateway Drive

Mail Stop 2120

Camp Springs, MD 20588

UR MENDOZA JADDOU, DIRECTOR,

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

5900 Capital Gateway Drive

Mail Stop 2120

Camp Springs, MD 20588

KIRT THOMPSON, DIRECTOR OF 

TEXAS SERVICE CENTER,

U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services

6046 N. Belt Line Rd. 

Irving, Texas 75038

Defendants.

Civil No.: 3:22-cv-01125-G

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is hereby DISMISSED by 

stipulation of the parties. Each party will bear its own costs/fees.

STIPULATED AND AGREED on this 19th day of December, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-01125-G Document 29 Filed 12/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 226
Stipulation of Dismissal – Page 2

/s/ Caitlin Rowe

Caitlin Rowe

Texas Bar No. 24124334

Sharadha Sankararaman Kodem 

Texas Bar No. 24090370

The Kodem Law Firm, PLLC

580 Decker Dr., Ste. 123

Irving, Texas 75062

Phone: 888-955-6634 ext. 101

Facsimile: 817-778-9980

Caitlin.rowe@kodemlaw.com

Sharadha.kodem@kodemlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dawn Whalen Theiss

Acting United States Attorney

/s/ Dawn Whalen Theiss

Dawn Whalen Theiss

Assistant United States Attorney

Texas Bar No. 24051755

1100 Commerce Street, Third Floor

Dallas, Texas 75242-1699

Telephone: 214-659-8628

Facsimile: 214-659-8807

Dawn.theiss@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 3:22-cv-01125-G Document 29 Filed 12/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 227
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6966

DENNIS GERALD GARDNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge; Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-49, CA-97-758-R) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Gerald Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Albert Lloret, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia; John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Dennis Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Gardner v. United States , Nos. CR-96-49; CA-97-758-R (W.D. Va. June 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

___________ 

No. 22-10780

Summary Calendar 

___________ 

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Joseph Michael Dupree,

Defendant—Appellant.

____________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-36-1 

____________________________ 

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

J U D G M E N T

This cause was considered on the record on appeal and the briefs on 

file. 

IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the appeal is 

DISMISSED as frivolous.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10780 Document: 00516723183 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/24/2023

Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 49 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 221
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-14-00412-CR

THOMAS OLIVAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 372nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1376698R)

February 20, 2020

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

This appeal is on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals. This court has 

again considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no error in 

the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is 

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth________________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth

Case 4:22-cv-00385-O Document 16-30 Filed 08/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5144
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 76/2006 of 17 January 2006 amending for the 61st time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

(Official Journal of the European Union L 12 of 18 January 2006)

for:

               ‘(c) VAT Number: BE 454,419,759’,

read:

               ‘(c) VAT Number: BE 454 419 759’.

for:

               ‘Address: (b) Via Dopini 3, Gallarati, Italy               ’,

read:

               ‘Address: (b) Via Dopini 3, Gallarate, Italy               ’;

for:

               ‘(b) 129 Park Road, NW8, London, England               ’,

read:

               ‘(b) 129 Park Road, London NW8, England               ’;

for:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 10.6.1996 which expired on 9.7.2001)’,

read:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 10.6.1996 which expired on 9.6.2001)’.

for:

               ‘Place of birth: Menzel Temine, Tunisia’,

read:

               ‘Place of birth: Menzel Temime, Tunisia’.

for:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 27.4.1999)’,

read:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 27.4.1999 which expired on 26.4.2004)’.

for:

               ‘Italian fiscal code: (a) DRR KML 67L22 Z352Q’,

read:

               ‘Italian fiscal code: (a) DDR KML 67L22 Z352Q’;

for:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 14.12.1995 which expired on 13.2.2000)’,

read:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 14.2.1995 which expired on 13.2.2000)’.

for:

               ‘(c)’,

read:

               ‘(b)’.

for:

               ‘Other information: He has also been identified as Ben Narvan Abdel Aziz, ...’,

read:

               ‘Other information: He has also been identified as Abdel Aziz Ben Narvan, ...’.

for:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 28.11.2001 which expires on 27.9.2006)’,

read:

               ‘(Tunisian passport issued on 28.9.2001 which expires on 27.9.2006)’.

----
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 265

To designate October 19, 1993, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1993

Mrs. LLOYD introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate October 19, 1993, as ‘‘National Mammography

Day’’.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, one hundred eighty-two thousand women will be diagnosed with

breast cancer in 1993, and forty-six thousand women will

die from this disease;

Whereas, in the decade of the 1990’s, it is estimated that

about two million women will be diagnosed with breast

cancer, resulting in nearly five hundred thousand deaths;

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a

woman at age seventy having twice as much of a chance

of developing the disease than a woman at age fifty;

Whereas 80 percent of women who get breast cancer have no

family history of the disease;
2

• HJ 265 IH

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at an

accredited facility, can provide a safe and quick diagnosis;

Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method

of early detection of breast cancer, and early detection is

the key to saving lives; and

Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers up to two years before regular clinical breast examinations or breast self-examinations (BSE), saving as

many as a third more lives: Now, therefore be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That October 19, 1993, be designated as ‘‘National Mam4 mography Day’’, and the President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people

6 of the United States to observe such day with appropriate

7 programs and activities.

Æ