alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, March 31, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00176

- CV

____________ JOSLYN M. JOHNSON, I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS E XECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF RODNEY JOHNSON, DECEASED , Appellant

V.

CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 53919



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 17, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filin g the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Kendra Garcia , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of th e date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Exhibit 10.3(G)

 

[MIRNA THERAPEUTICS LETTERHEAD]

 

[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

August 24, 2015

 

Marina Biotech, Inc.

3830 Monte Villa Parkway

Bothell, Washington 98201

Attn: J. Michael French, President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Re: Selection and Agreement Regarding Option Compound

 

Dear Michael:

 

Reference is made to that certain License Agreement effective December 22, 2011 by and between Mirna Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“MirnaRx”), and Marina Biotech, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Marina Bio”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 effective December 27, 2013 and Amendment No. 2 effective May 11, 2015, and as further supplemented by Side Letters dated December 22, 2011, November 16, 2012, and January 9, 2014 (collectively, as amended, the “Agreement”).  Capitalized words used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

 

MirnaRx and Marina Bio agree as follows:

 

1.              MirnaRx desires to select the Option Compound [***] as the fifth Selected MirnaRx Compound in accordance with Section 2.6 of the Agreement.  Marina Bio confirms that the selected Option Compound is Available and shall be deemed a Selected MirnaRx Compound.

 

2.              With respect to the associated selection fee payment set forth in Section 5.2(b)(i) of the Agreement, (a) the initial portion of the selection fee shall be [***] provided that it is [***] by MirnaRx to Marina Bio on or before [***], and (b) the [***] due upon MirnaRx’s sublicensing to a Sublicensee of the Licensed Product containing the selected Selected MirnaRx Compound, as set forth in Section 5.2(b)(ii) of the Agreement.

 

3.              The sequence of the selected Selected MirnaRx Compound is the highly confidential information of MirnaRx, and Marina Bio shall comply with the confidentiality obligations set forth in the Agreement with respect thereto.

 











 

4.              This side letter (the “Side Letter”) shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement; provided that, to the extent that the terms set forth in this Side Letter conflict with the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this Side Letter shall govern and control.

 

 

	
AGREED   TO BY:
    	
MIRNA   THERAPEUTICS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/   Casi DeYoung
    
	
 
    	
Casi   DeYoung
    
	
 
    	
Chief   Business Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
MARINA   BIOTECH, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/   J. Michael French
    
	
 
    	
J.   Michael French
    
	
 
    	
President &   Chief Executive Officer
    


 



Mirna Therapeutics Inc. | 2150 Woodward St., Suite 100 | Austin, TX  78744 | 1.512.901.0900 | www.mirnarx.com
# C_2015182EN.01000201.xml

| 3.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,05 % on 1 June 2015

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 June 2015

(2015/C 182/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1029 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4590 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3810 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0391 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6755 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,439 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,29 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1288 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4408 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9556 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4342 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3784 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5539 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5487 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4945 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 228,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,5207 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8358 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5725 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 570,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0769 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,290 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 58,5640 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,255 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4735 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0376 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,4047 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1029

JPY

Japanese yen

137,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4590

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3810

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0391

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6755

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,439

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,29

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1288

RON

Romanian leu

4,4408

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9556

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4342

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3784

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5539

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5487

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4945

KRW

South Korean won

1 228,83

ZAR

South African rand

13,5207

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8358

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5725

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 570,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0769

PHP

Philippine peso

49,290

RUB

Russian rouble

58,5640

THB

Thai baht

37,255

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4735

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0376

INR

Indian rupee

70,4047

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ ) GREGORY CHARLES KRUG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-02069 (ABJ) ) JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., et al. , ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on December 3, 2010. The Court will dismiss the complaint sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 Plaintiff is a prisoner at the United States Peni tentiary in Salters, South Carolina suing the nine justices of the United States Supreme Court seeking damages for the justices’ alleged failure to recuse themselves from considering a petition for a writ of certiorari that plaintiff filed in 2009. Compl ¶ 7. This Court lack s subject matter jurisd iction to review the decisions of the Supreme Court. In re Marin , 956 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1992). De nial of a petition for writ of certiorari is a judicial action and the Supreme Court justices are absolutely immune from liability. Reddy v. O’Connor , 520 F. Supp. 2d 124, 130 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Sindram v. Suda , 986 F.2d 1459 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

1 “If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).2 Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge DATE: June 13, 2011
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 11948 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 1349

Mr. Theodore W. Tierney

3D Drafting LLC

P.O. Box 1733

Kailua

- Kona , HI 96745

Dear Mr. Tierney :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated posted to the public docket on Ju ly 22, 2016 , you petitioned the Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of 3D Drafting LLC (hereinafter petitioner or

operator) for an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and

( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You

requested an amendment to chang e the company name from Airfoil Enterprises, Inc. to 3D

Drafting LLC

. 1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemptio n.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the pet itioner.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11948

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is

granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, 3D Drafting LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11948 remain in effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be

grounds for the immediate suspensi on or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on July 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
H. J. Res. 389

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Joint Resolution

To designate the second Sunday in October of 1994 as ‘‘National Children’s Day’’.

Whereas the people of the United States should celebrate children

as the most valuable asset of the Nation;

Whereas children represent the future, hope, and inspiration of

the United States;

Whereas the children of the United States should be allowed to

feel that their ideas and dreams will be respected because adults

in the United States take time to listen;

Whereas many children of the United States face crises of grave

proportions, especially as they enter adolescent years;

Whereas it is important for parents to spend time listening to

their children on a daily basis;

Whereas modern societal and economic demands often pull the

family apart;

Whereas encouragement should be given to families to set aside

a special time for all family members to engage together in

family activities;

Whereas adults in the United States should have an opportunity

to reminisce on their youth to recapture some of the fresh insight,

innocence, and dreams that they may have lost through the

years;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children

of the United States will provide an opportunity to emphasize

to children the importance of developing an ability to make the

choices necessary to distance themselves from impropriety and

to contribute to their communities;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children

of the Nation will emphasize to the people of the United States

the importance of the role of the child within the family and

society;

Whereas the people of the United States should emphasize to children the importance of family life, education, and spiritual qualities; and

Whereas children are the responsibility of all Americans, thus everyone should celebrate the children of the United States, whose

questions, laughter, and tears are important to the existence

of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the second
H. J. Res. 389—2

Sunday in October of 1994 is designated as ‘‘National Children’s

Day’’, and the President of the United States is authorized and

requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the

United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and

activities.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Official Journal L 177/6 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 177 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 506 July 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 177

English edition

Legislation

Volume 506 July 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | | 2007/450/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Decision of the European Parliament of 26 September 2006 on the discharge for the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004, Section I — European Parliament | 1 |
| Resolution of the European Parliament with comments forming an integral part of the Decision on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004, Section I — European Parliament | 3 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

European Parliament

2007/450/EC, Euratom

*

Decision of the European Parliament of 26 September 2006 on the discharge for the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004, Section I — European Parliament

1

Resolution of the European Parliament with comments forming an integral part of the Decision on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004, Section I — European Parliament

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1006 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1006

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to expand the requirement 
  that legislation be accompanied by cost estimates of its impact on 
                      State and local governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 1993

  Mr. Shays (for himself, Mr. Mfume, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. 
Clinger, Mr. Petri, Mr. Goodling, Mrs. Vucanovich, Mr. Rohrabacher, Ms. 
Snowe, Mr. Paxon, Mr. Fawell, and Mr. McHugh) introduced the following 
           bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to expand the requirement 
  that legislation be accompanied by cost estimates of its impact on 
                      State and local governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANALYSIS BY CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE.

    Section 403(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or conference report'' before ``, and 
        submit'';
            (2) by striking ``if timely submitted to such committee 
        before such report is filed'' and inserting ``or the joint 
        explanatory statement accompanying such conference report''; 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``It 
        shall not be in order in the House of Representatives or the 
        Senate to consider any significant bill or resolution, or any 
        conference report on a significant bill or resolution, if the 
        report accompanying the bill or resolution or the joint 
        explanatory statement accompanying the conference report does 
        not comply with the preceding sentence.''.

SEC. 2. RECONCILIATION INSTRUCTIONS.

    Section 310(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended 
by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (3), by striking the period 
and inserting ``; or'' at the end of paragraph (4), and by inserting 
after paragraph (4) the following:
            ``(5) direct any committee receiving an instruction under 
        paragraph (1) or (2) to include the estimate required by 
        section 403(a) with the reconciliation legislation that carries 
        out such instruction.''.

                                 <all>
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08965**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 08965\08965_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08965\08965_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 08965\08965_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 08965\08965_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08965\08965_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08965\08965_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08965\08965_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08965\08965_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08965\Certification Statement Plant ID 08965.pdf Plant certification statement x 08965\Extra Files\08965_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08965\Supplemental Documents\08965_Block Diagram for Pond 1.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08965\Supplemental Documents\08965_Block Diagram for Pond 2.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08965\Supplemental Documents\08965_Map-1.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08965\Supplemental Documents\08965_Water Balance F-3025.1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# LTC Rose Lopez Keravuori Published in Small Wars Journal

/ Published July 30, 2015

LTC Rose Lopez Keravuori, US Army Reserve,  currently a student of Advanced Joint Professional Military Education (AJPME) published “The Battle of Waterloo on its 200th Anniversary: Relevant Lessons on fighting with a Multinational Coalition” in Small Wars Journal, July 2, 2015. 

The article can be found at the link below.

http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-battle-of-waterloo-on-its-200th-anniversary-relevant-lessons-on-fighting-with-a-multina
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 7, 2020

Order 

Clerk

January 7, 2020

158751(125)(129)

COUNCIL OF ORGANIZATIONS AND

OTHERS FOR EDUCATION ABOUT 

PAROCHIAID, AMERICAN CIVIL 

LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN,

MICHIGAN PARENTS FOR SCHOOLS,

482FORWARD, MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION

OF SCHOOL BOARDS, MICHIGAN 

ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL 

ADMINISTRATORS, MICHIGAN 

ASSOCIATION OF INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

ADMINISTRATORS, MICHIGAN SCHOOL

BUSINESS OFFICIALS, MICHIGAN 

ASSOCIATION OF SECONDARY SCHOOL

PRINCIPALS, MIDDLE CITIES EDUCATION

ASSOCIATION, MICHIGAN ELEMENTARY

AND MIDDLE SCHOOL PRINCIPALS

ASSOCIATION, KALAMAZOO PUBLIC

SCHOOLS and KALAMAZOO PUBLIC 

SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 158751

v COA: 343801

Ct of Claims: 17-000068-MB

STATE OF MICHIGAN, GOVERNOR, 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, and

SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC 

INSTRUCTION,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of amici curiae Attorney General 

Dana Nessel and the Michigan Catholic Conference et al. for oral argument are 

GRANTED. Attorney General Nessel shall have five minutes of oral argument and the 

Michigan Catholic Conference et al. shall have ten minutes of oral argument separate from 

that of the parties.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 417 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 417

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 3 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for temporary extension of the application of the final 
 paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act with respect to the 
   dispute between the Soo Line Railroad Company and certain of its 
                               employees.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PROHIBITION.

    The final paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act (45 
U.S.C. 160) shall apply and be extended through February 28, 1995, with 
respect to the dispute referred to in Executive Order No. 12925 of 
August 29, 1994. During this extension period no change, except by 
agreement, shall be made by the rail carrier, the Soo Line Railroad 
Company, or by the employees of such carrier represented by the United 
Transportation Union, in the conditions out of which the dispute arose 
as such conditions existed before July 14, 1994.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```