alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 214/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 214 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6216 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 214

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6216 August 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1347 of 8 August 2019 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Roquefort’ (PDO)) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2019/1348 of the European Central Bank of 18 July 2019 on the procedure for recognising non-euro area Member States as reporting Member States under Regulation (EU) 2016/867 on the collection of granular credit and credit risk data (ECB/2019/20) | 3 |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2019/1349 of the European Central Bank of 26 July 2019 on the procedure and conditions for exercise by a competent authority of certain powers in relation to oversight of systemically important payment systems (ECB/2019/25) | 16 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1347 of 8 August 2019 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Roquefort’ (PDO))

1

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2019/1348 of the European Central Bank of 18 July 2019 on the procedure for recognising non-euro area Member States as reporting Member States under Regulation (EU) 2016/867 on the collection of granular credit and credit risk data (ECB/2019/20)

3

*

Decision (EU) 2019/1349 of the European Central Bank of 26 July 2019 on the procedure and conditions for exercise by a competent authority of certain powers in relation to oversight of systemically important payment systems (ECB/2019/25)

16

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 15764

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:14

- cv

- 00260

- HLM

J USTIN HAMMETT, as Administrator of the Estate of Daniel Hammett,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
PAULDING COUNTY, GEORGIA, CITY OF DALLAS, GEORGIA, NATHALIE D. WHITENER, in her individual capacity, JOEY HORSLEY, in his individual capacity, JOSEPH MAYFIELD, in his individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,
GARY GULLEDGE, in his individual cap acity and his capacity as Sheriff of Paulding County, Georgia, et al.,

Defendants.

Case: 16-15764 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 Page: 1 of 2________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern D istrict of Georgia

________________________

Before JULIE CARNES AND BLACK, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM: The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Petition(s) for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED. ** The opinion and decision in this case do not decide that physical evidence could never sufficiently contradict swor n , eyewitness , personal

- knowledge testimony so as to justify a denial of summary judgment

. T he inferences that might be reasonably drawn from the pertinent physical evidence here, however, are insufficient to support plaintiff’ s theory about the shooting incident underlying this case. Plaintiff’s theory projects too far past the limits of the evidence that he has actually presented.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

___________________________________ UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

_____________

* Honorable Kathleen M. Williams, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation

. ** Judge Williams would grant the motion for panel rehearing.

Case: 16-15764 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 Page: 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSHUA GOODEAU, )

)

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:22-CV-1900-K (BH)

)

FNU LNU, IRS Employee, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any

objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion

that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are

accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The case will be dismissed by

separate judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders.

SO ORDERED.

Signed December 6th, 2022.

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01900-K-BH Document 6 Filed 12/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 25
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Wednesday, November 22, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:   

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-29575 Filed 11-15-00; 11:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 313 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 313

    To designate February 1994 as ``National Black History Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1994

  Mrs. Collins of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    To designate February 1994 as ``National Black History Month''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That February 1994 is 
designated as ``National Black History Month'', and the President of 
the United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States to observe such month with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
# Relevancy to the Joint Force

/ Published Feb. 14, 2019

**The  Institutional Research, Assessment, and Accreditation Division within Joint Forces Staff College** conducted a thorough review of Geographic Combatant Command, Functional Combatant Command, and JPME-II student feedback and have published it's analysis on JFSC's**"Relevancy to the Joint Force"**, published Sept 2017.  Comments from a recent student, *“Just wanted to let you know how well JCWS prepared me for this job. I am way ahead of the majority of my counterparts that don't have JPME II – and there are a lot of them. You don't truly realize the value of what you learned until you have to apply it in your next job.”*Additional IRAAD findings:-*-"***Overall, findings suggest JFSC programs and courses meet their intended missions and are relevant to the joint force. While JFSC strives to maintain relevancy through its continuous curriculum development process, maximum relevancy will not be reached until students attend their respective programs at the most appropriate and beneficial times in their careers."**
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending October 6, 2000

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2000-8059.
    Date Filed: October 4, 2000.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 25, 2000.
    Description: Application of Mountain Bird Inc. d/b/a Salmon Air 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41738 and Subpart Q, requests authority 
to operate scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-8074.
    Date Filed: October 5, 2000.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 26, 2000.
    Description: Application of Euroatlantic Airways-Transportes 
Aereos, S.A. (``Euroatlantic'') pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41301 and 
Subpart Q, requests a foreign air carrier permit authorizing it to 
engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and 
mail between points in Portugal and points in the United States and 
between points in the United States and points in third countries.

Dorothy Y. Beard,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-29239 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Exhibit 34.8



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (Midland or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for
all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management System (the Platform), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 17, 2017



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100
Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106

T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890www.pwc.com/us
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0455 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RONALD JOSEPH VALLIE JR.,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 20, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2021

07/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0455
#### SANDERS v. STATE.

No. 21795.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1942.

Mel Janes, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Sam H. Davidson, Co. Atty., of Level-land, and Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This appeal is from a fine of $100 for violation of • the local option law and is from the county court of Plockley County.

There is only one bill of exception in the case, which complains of the testimony of an officer that he had arrested appellant on a previous occasion for violation of the liquor laws. Prior to this testimony, appellant, at the instance of his counsel, had told of having been arrested and kept in jail about twenty minutes, and said if he signed a bond he did not remember it. Neither did he know what became of his case.

The statement of facts found in the case appears in question and answer form and we are, therefore, unable to give it any consideration. In the absence of this we cannot appraise the value of the bill of exception, but it appears to us that it is perfectly proper for the State to make a full explanation about a matter which was-brought out by appellant himself and about which he did not seem to be certain.

We find no error in the record and, consequently, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The particular offense for which appellant was convicted was the sale of whiskey in a wet area, without a license.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant insists that there was no proof showing that Hockley County was a “wet” area. As pointed out in the original opinion, no statement of facts is before us for consideration; hence, we are unable to apprize appellant’s contention. Moreover, under the terms of Art. 666 — 23, Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code, all area of the state is “wet,” except that which has been determined to be “dry.” Unless the proof shows that the area is “dry,” it is by law “wet.”

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Timothy Hymes, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: In 1987 defendant was held for the Grand Jury on a charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. On October 20, 1987 defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree on a superior court information.

In 1989 defendant was indicted for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), i.e., possessing a firearm after having been previously convicted of a crime. The predicate crime was the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty in 1987.

Relying on our decision in *People v Menchetti*(154 AD2d 886), County Court dismissed the indictment because it was "not supported by a jurisdictionally valid crime.” Subsequently, the Court of Appeals reversed our decision *(People v Menchetti,*76 NY2d 473). As a consequence, the superior court information on which defendant entered a plea was not jurisdictionally defective, as conceded by defendant, and the indictment herein is reinstated. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—dismiss ? indictment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 396

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that no person born in the United States will be a United States

citizen on account of birth in the United States unless a parent is

a United States citizen at the time of the birth.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1994

Mr. CALLAHAN (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. TRAFICANT, and Mr. EVERETT)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that no person born in the United

States will be a United States citizen on account of

birth in the United States unless a parent is a United

States citizen at the time of the birth.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu-
2

•HJ 396 IH

1 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

2 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

3 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with4 in seven years after the date of its submission to the

5 States for ratification:

6 ‘‘ARTICLE—

7 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person born in the United States

8 after the date of the ratification of this article shall be

9 a citizen of the United States, or of any State, on account

10 of birth in the United States unless the mother or father

11 of the person is a citizen of the United States at the time

12 of the birth.

13 ‘‘SEC. 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce

14 this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
Case 3:22-cv-02051-B Document 5 Filed 09/26/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 556
SDNY

October 9, 2003

Case 3:22-cv-02051-B Document 5 Filed 09/26/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 557
Case 3:22-cv-02051-B Document 5 Filed 09/26/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 558
Case 3:22-cv-02051-B Document 5 Filed 09/26/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 559
Case 3:22-cv-02051-B Document 5 Filed 09/26/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 560
Case 3:22-cv-02051-B Document 5 Filed 09/26/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 561
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 361

To designate the year of 1995 as the ‘‘Year of the American Flag’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 1994

Mr. SOLOMON (for himself and Mr. HUTTO) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the year of 1995 as the ‘‘Year of the American

Flag’’.

Whereas the flag of the United States of America is the symbol of our Nation, to which our Pledge of Allegiance is

directed;

Whereas that flag unites all Americans across divisions of region, politics, race, or religion;

Whereas millions of American men and women have fought

under that flag to defend their country and to advance

the cause of human freedom all over the world; and
2

HJ 361 IH

Whereas the year 1995 will mark the fiftieth anniversary of

the end of the Second World War, in which that flag became the banner of hope and liberation for all mankind:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That it is the sense of Congress that the President is au4 thorized to proclaim 1995 as the ‘‘Year of the American

5 Flag’’; and that all Americans are encouraged to display

6 the flag in appropriate ways at home, in places of work,

7 and in schools; and that the history and symbolism of the

8 flag should be taught in all schools as a means of convey9 ing to young Americans the ideals which it has always rep10 resented; and that the Year of the Flag should be the occa11 sion for special observances at the local, State, and na12 tional level to foster both greater respect for our national

13 banner and greater patriotism on the part of all those over

14 whom it waves.

Æ