alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NANANETTE NEDD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 3:22-cv-02322-K-BT

§

DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL §

DISTRICT, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated 

February 13, 2024. (ECF No. 33). The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

Signed March 5th, 2024.

______________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02322-K-BT Document 34 Filed 03/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 327
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CHARLES EDWARD SCOTT, §

 § 

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00803-O-BP

 §

W. LANCASTER POST OFFICE, §

 §

Defendant. §

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED on this 18th day of October, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00803-O Document 8 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 24
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Guo Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
By:  /s/ Guo Yan Guo Yan  Chief Financial Officer   
 

 

November 29, 2006
# Official Journal C 14/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.014.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 14 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5320 January 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.014.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 14

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5320 January 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 014/01 | Seventh Annual Report on the implementation of the Council Joint Action of 12 July 2002 on the European Union’s contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons (2002/589/CFSP) | 1 |
| 2010/C 014/02 | Eighth Annual Report on the implementation of the Council Joint Action of 12 July 2002 on the European Union’s contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons (2002/589/CFSP) | 35 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2010/C 014/01

Seventh Annual Report on the implementation of the Council Joint Action of 12 July 2002 on the European Union’s contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons (2002/589/CFSP)

1

2010/C 014/02

Eighth Annual Report on the implementation of the Council Joint Action of 12 July 2002 on the European Union’s contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons (2002/589/CFSP)

35

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 2:22-cv-00189-Z-BR Document 8 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00723-CV

In re Primarily Primates, Inc., Stephen Rene Tello, Robert O. McNaughton, Timothy K.

Morgan, Kenneth E. O’Berg, Lou Griffin O’Neill, and Ruby Christine Stevens

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for writ of

mandamus stating that they have settled all of their claims in the lawsuit in the trial court. We grant

the motion and dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Waldrop

Filed: May 11, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

_____________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.

SIDESOLVE, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

EMPIRE ROOFING, INC.; EMPIRE ROOFING 

COMPANIES, INC.; EMPIRE ROOFING OF 

OKLAHOMA, INC.; EMPIRE ROOFING AND 

SHEET METAL, INC.; SR DISPOSAL, LTD f/k/a 

EMPIRE DISPOSAL, LTD; EMPIRE ROOFING 

COMPANY SOUTHEAST, LLC; EMPIRE 

ROOFING COMPANY OF GEORGIA, LLC; 

RONNIE MCGLOTHLIN; SANDRA SEDILLOMCGLOTHLIN; AND TECTA AMERICA CORP.,

 Defendants.

Civil Case No. 3:22-CV-2060-B

ORDER ON THE JOINT STIPULATION OF 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL BY THE UNITED STATES AND RELATOR

Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal by the United States 

and the Relator Sidesolve, LLC, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the 

parties, and for good cause shown:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, with respect to the Relator, all claims asserted in this 

action are hereby dismissed with prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to the United States, the claims 

asserted in this action against Defendants Empire Roofing, Inc., Empire Roofing Companies, Inc., 

Empire Roofing Company Southeast, LLC, Empire Roofing Company of Georgia, Inc., Empire 

Roofing of Oklahoma, Empire Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc., SR Disposal, Ltd. (f/k/a Empire 

Case 3:22-cv-02060-B Document 27 Filed 12/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 98
-2-

Disposal, Ltd.), Ronnie McGlothlin, Sandra Sedillo-McGlothlin, and Tecta America Corp. that 

are included within the Covered Conduct, as defined in the Settlement Agreement, are dismissed 

with prejudice; all other claims asserted in this action are dismissed without prejudice as to the 

United States; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction over any disputes that 

may arise regarding the Settlement Agreement referenced herein. 

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED: December 7, 2023

________________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02060-B Document 27 Filed 12/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 99
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARCUS L. WILLIS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1251-E

§

WESTERN POWER SPORTS, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. Objections were filed. The District Court reviewed de 

novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to 

which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, 

conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court 

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 7th day of June, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-01251-E-BN Document 36 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 337
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

December 2, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Volvo

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Thursday, December 2, 2010 between Volvo, 

EPA, and DOT and included the following individuals:

Volvo: Tony Greszler, Susan Alt, Marc Miller, Jeff Schaeffer, Dave Smith, Bob 

Fasnacht, and Peter Prout

EPA: Byron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Rich Zhang, Chien Sze, Chuck Moulis, and Angela 

Cullen

DOT: Kevin Green, Ryan Harrington

The discussion focused primarily on innovative credits, alternative engine standards, ABT, small 

volume and business exemptions, and on/off-road vehicle exemptions.
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 8 PageID 321
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 2 of 8 PageID 322
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 3 of 8 PageID 323
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 4 of 8 PageID 324
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 5 of 8 PageID 325
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 6 of 8 PageID 326
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 7 of 8 PageID 327
Case 3:22-cr-00369-X Document 13 Filed 09/27/22 Page 8 of 8 PageID 328
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

THEOTIS LEE HODGE, §

TDCJ-CID No. 00504582, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:22-CV-200-Z-BR

§

D. ZIMMERMAN, et al., §

§

 Defendants. §

ORDER TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE PENDING APPEAL

On November 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed an interlocutory appeal of the Court’s order 

dismissing unserved Defendant Sheila Briscoe (ECF 59), and the appellate court has ordered 

briefing on the merits. Due to the pendency of the appeal, the Court will administratively close 

this case without prejudice and suspend all deadlines in this case, effective immediately. Therefore, 

the following motions are hereby TERMINATED:

1. Motion for Default Judgment Against Kim Massey (ECF 56);

2. Second Motion for Discovery and Motion to Compel (ECF 57);

3. Motion for Extension of Time to File Summary Judgment (ECF 61);

4. Motion to Strike Answer to Complaint (ECF 67); 

5. Motion for Hearing on Default Judgment (ECF 70); and

6. Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (ECF 71).

After this case is reopened upon resolution of the appeal, the Court will enter a new 

scheduling order and Plaintiff may re-urge these motions, if necessary, in accordance with such 

scheduling order. The clerk is ordered to administratively close this case for statistical purposes 

without prejudice to its being reopened for further proceedings.

Case 2:22-cv-00200-Z-BR Document 73 Filed 01/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 327
IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED January 23, 2024.

____________________________________

LEE ANN RENO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-00200-Z-BR Document 73 Filed 01/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 328
1 of 3 

### Transport Rule Proposal Air Quality Modeling Data Drive

EPA has placed in the docket a data drive containing certain air quality modeling data files, run scripts, and codes that were used for the Transport Rule proposal.

Information on the air quality modeling perf ormed for the Transport Rule including a description of the modeling domains, model inputs, emissions scen arios, contribution modeling, and results can be found in th e Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document that is located in the Transport Rule docket. An electronic copy of this document is also available at the following web site: http://www.epa.gov/airquali ty/transport/tech.html

The following information is contained on this data drive. The di rectory structure is

shown in Table 1.

I. CAMx Model Input Files - 2005 model-ready meteorology for the 36 km and 12 km modeling domains - Albedo/Haze/Ozone input files

- Chemical Parameter file - Initial, boundary, and top concentration files for the 36 km domain (used for all 36 km domain model runs) - Initial, boundary, and top concentrati on files for the 12 km domain (separate files for each emissions scenario)

- Landuse files for the 36 km and 12 km domains - Photolysis Rates files for the 36 km and 12 km domains

II. Emissions Processing Data, Codes, Scripts -Data and scripts that can be us ed with SMOKE 2.4 to reproduce emissions modeling data used for the tran sport rule air quality model simulations.

III. CAMx model run scripts and post-processing scripts and codes

IV. MATS output files for creating ozone, annual PM2.5, and 24-hour PM2.5 design

values for each future year scenario modeled.

V. Scripts and data used to create the ai r quality contribution ta bles for ozone, annual PM2.5, and daily PM2.5 from the 2012 source apportionment modeling.

VI. Test case with emissions inputs for a tw o-day simulation of the 36 km domain and

the 12 km domain.2 of 3 EPA will respond to specific re quests for subsets of the data or for specific additional inputs and outputs of the modeling process, depe nding on the availability of the data. In this regard, EPA has provided air quality m odel-ready emissions files not contained on the data drive in response to separate reque sts. These data incl ude (1) emissions inputs for the 2005 base year, 2012 base case, 2014 base case, and 2014 remedy scenarios for the 36 km and 12 km modeling domains and (2) emissions inputs for the 2012 ozone and 2012 PM source tagging model runs. These and all the relevant data and inputs used in the air quality modeling are in corporated into the docket.

Requests for electronic copies of the Transpor t Rule air quality modeling data should be sent to Norm Possiel ( possiel.norm@epa.gov ) and Brian Timin ( timin.brian@epa.gov )3 of 3 Table 1. Directory Structure for Air Quality Modeling Data Drive.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES,INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, ADIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHASURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C28 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 1

Class Action Complaint

Berkey System Box

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID 86
Travel Berkey: Product Image

Exhibit 1(a) Travel Berkey

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID 87
Big Berkey: Product Image

Exhibit 1(b) Big Berkey

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID 88
Berkey Light: Product Image

Exhibit 1(c) Berkey Light

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID 89
Royal Berkey: Product Image

Exhibit 1(d) Royal Berkey

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID 90
Imperial Berkey: Product Image

Exhibit 1(e) Imperial Berkey

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID 91
Crown Berkey: Product Image

Exhibit 1(f) Crown Berkey

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID 92
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 50

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    allowing the President to veto any item of appropriation or any 
    provision in any Act or joint resolution containing an item of 
                             appropriation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Stump introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    allowing the President to veto any item of appropriation or any 
    provision in any Act or joint resolution containing an item of 
                             appropriation.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The President may disapprove, in any Act or joint 
resolution containing an item of appropriation, any item of 
appropriation or any provision. If an Act or joint resolution is 
approved by the President, any item of appropriation or provision 
contained in the Act or joint resolution that is not disapproved shall 
become law. The President shall return, with his objections, any 
disapproved item of appropriation or provision to the House in which 
the Act or joint resolution containing such item or provision 
originated, and may group such disapproved items or provisions for 
reconsideration by the Congress. The Congress may reconsider any item 
of appropriation or provision disapproved under this article in the 
manner prescribed under section 7 of article I for Acts disapproved by 
the President. The Congress may consider such disapproved items or 
provisions separately or as grouped by the President upon return of the 
disapproved items, but may not consider such disapproved items or 
provisions in any other grouping.
    ``Section 2. This article shall take effect at noon on the third 
day of January of the first odd-numbered year beginning after the date 
of the ratification of this article.''.

                                 <all>
```
1620628.1INDEX OF DOCUMENTS FILED IN STATE COURT

CAUSE NO. CC-22-04153-A

MARIA DELBOSQUE §

§

 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW

v. § NO. 1

SAM’S EAST, INC. 

§

§

§ OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

INDEX OF DOCUMENTS FILED IN STATE COURT

1. State Court’s Docket Sheet, printed August 24, 2022;

2. Plaintiff’s Original Petition; filed August 2, 2022; 

3. Citation; issued August 3, 2022; 

4. Officer’s Return of Service; filed August 5, 2022; 

5. Defendant’s Original Answer; filed August 12, 2022; and 

6. Defendant’s Jury Demand; filed August 12, 2022.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Steven Moses

STEVEN J. MOSES

Texas Bar No. 24056014

smoses@cowlesthompson.com 

(214) 672-2130

(214) 672-2330 (Fax)

TRAVIS H. BOLTZ

Texas Bar No. 24104925

tboltz@cowlesthompson.com

(214) 672-2144

COWLES & THOMPSON, P.C.

901 Main Street, Suite 3900

Dallas, TX 75202

(214) 672-2000

(214) 672-2020 (Fax)

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

Case 3:22-cv-01953-G Document 1-1 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5
1620628.1INDEX OF DOCUMENTS FILED IN STATE COURT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been 

forwarded via electronic mail on this 2nd day of September, 2022, pursuant to the Texas Rules of 

Civil Procedure.

/s/ Steven Moses

STEVEN J. MOSES

Case 3:22-cv-01953-G Document 1-1 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 6
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 83

To designate the week beginning March 7, 1993, as ‘‘National Manufacturing

Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. VALENTINE (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Florida) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office

and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week beginning March 7, 1993, as

‘‘National Manufacturing Week’’.

Whereas, throughout the history of the United States, manufacturing has contributed substantially to the economic

well-being of the Nation;

Whereas manufacturing is an essential yet often overlooked

component of the economic foundation of the United

States;

Whereas a strong manufacturing industry contributes to continued growth, prosperity, and high-paying jobs in every

other sector of the national economy;
2

•HJ 83 IH

Whereas manufacturing directly employs more than

18,000,000 workers, and at least 18,000,000 workers in

the service sector depend on a sound manufacturing sector for their jobs;

Whereas manufacturing accounts for many of the highest

paying jobs in the economy, and manufacturing wages

are 20 percent higher on the average than non-manufacturing wages;

Whereas, in the 1980’s, manufacturing increased from 20 to

23 percent of the gross national product, and manufacturing productivity in the last decade has increased at an

annual rate of 3.6 percent, 3 times faster than the rate

at which non-manufacturing activity has increased;

Whereas the quality revolution has been 1 of the most important factors contributing to the recent resurgence of

manufacturing in the United States;

Whereas manufacturing is an important source of tax revenue for the Federal Government, and State and local

governments;

Whereas the continued leadership of the United States in

science and technology is inherently linked to the success

of manufacturing;

Whereas manufactured goods account for more than 80 percent of the trade deficit of the United States, indicating

that manufacturing is especially important to overall national competitiveness and international trade;

Whereas a sound manufacturing economy is an essential precondition for a strong national defense;

Whereas the school children of the Nation should be educated

about job opportunities in manufacturing; and
3

•HJ 83 IH

Whereas the people of the United States should be educated

about the importance of manufacturing to the economy,

the international competitiveness, and the standard of living of the Nation, and about the challenges and changing

nature of manufacturing: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning March 7, 1993, is designated as

4 ‘‘National Manufacturing Week’’, and the President is au5 thorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on

6 the people of the United States to observe the week with

7 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ