alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-10-223-E 

May 7, 2010 

 Exemption No. 8368C 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-18516 

Mr. Scott Rohlfing 

3410 Royal Meadow Lane 

San Jose, CA 95135 

Dear Mr. Rohlfing: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8368, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter posted to the docket on April 7, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 8368, as amended. That exemption 

from § 91.109(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows you to conduct certain flight 

training in certain Beechcraft Bonanza/Debonair airplanes that are equipped with a 

functioning throwover control wheel. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8368, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 
 2

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8368, as amended, to 

July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8368, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8368. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
Case 4:22-cr-00038-O Document 41 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 83
Case 4:22-cr-00038-O Document 41 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 84
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 40025 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Agusto Lazo -**  **Aguirre,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16 - CR - 15 - 1

**__________________ ____________**  Before **Higginbotham, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Agusto Lazo - Aguirre, federal prisoner # 15209 - 002, appeals the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. He argues that he has shown extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief, given that he suffers from nume rous medical conditions that could result in severe illness or death if he were to contract COVID - 19

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 22, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40025 Document: 00516795733 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2023No. 23 - 40025

2 and given that his parents are suffering from chronic health conditions requiring his assistance as a caretaker. In addition, Lazo - Aguirre maintains that this court has no basis to review the denial of relief because the district court failed to consider whether he was entitled to release pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Although in the district court Lazo - Aguirre alleged that the proliferation of black mold in the prison constituted an extraordinary and compelling reason for release, he does not repeat that argument before this court , and it is deemed abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224 - 25 (5th Cir. 1993). We review the district court’s denial for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). Lazo - Aguirre has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in finding that there were no extraordinary and compelling circumstanc es warranting relief. See United States v. Rodriguez , 27 F.4th 1097, 1 1 00 - 01 (5th Cir. 2022); United States v. Thompson , 984 F.3d 431, 433 - 35 (5th Cir. 2021). As the district court concluded that Lazo - Aguirre failed to show extraordinary and compelling c ircumstances, it was not necessary for the court to address the § 3553(a) factors . See United States v. Jackson , 27 F.4th 1088, 1093 n.8 (5th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 23-40025 Document: 00516795733 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2023
NUMBER 13-22-00603-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ROSALINDA GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

COSTA MESSA RESTAURANT, 

CHRISTOPHER G. ACOSTA, 

HAIDAR PROPERTIES LTD, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

This cause is before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss appeal. The parties, 

having reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences, request the 

cause be dismissed. 
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to 

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. In accordance 

with the motion, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

11th day of May, 2023.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 5 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 5

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the terms of office of the judges of the Supreme and inferior 
                                courts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Applegate introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the terms of office of the judges of the Supreme and inferior 
                                courts.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be valid only if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of the submission of this joint 
resolution by the Congress for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. (a) Subject to the limitations of subsection (b), each 
judge of the Supreme Court or of any inferior court shall be appointed 
to serve during good behavior for a term of six years.
    ``(b) No individual may serve for a total of more than twelve years 
as a judge of the Supreme Court, for a total of more than twelve years 
as a judge of any inferior court, or for a combined total of more than 
twelve years as a judge of any two or more inferior courts.
    ``Section 2. This article shall not apply with respect to any judge 
of the Supreme Court or any inferior court who holds office by reason 
of appointment to such office before the ratification of this 
article.''.

                                 <all>
```
Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda

November 6, 2014

1:00 – 1:10 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance Office

1:10 – 1:15 New Business 

 Certification of August 7, 2014 Meeting Minutes

1:15 – 2:05 Discussion of the Role of Cyber Insurance in Cybersecurity 

 Presentation by Adam Sedgewick on National Institute of Standards 

 and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework

 Presentation by Catherine Mulligan (Zurich N.A.) on Security & Privacy 

 Insurance Landscape

 Discussion

2:05 – 2:15 Break

2:15 – 3:00 Discussion of the Affordability of Auto Insurance 

 Presentation by J. Robert Hunter (Consumer Federation of America) 

 on the Cost of Mandatory Auto Insurance for Lower Income Households

 Discussion

3:00 – 3:50 Discussion of International Supervisory Standards for Insurers, Including Capital

 Presentation by Tom Finnell (Federal Insurance Office)

 Discussion of Workstreams of the International Association of 

 Insurance Supervisors

 Discussion of Insurance Capital Standards (ICS) and the 

 U.S. Proposal on ICS 

 Discussion of EU-U.S. Insurance Project

3:50 - 4:00 Discussion of Subcommittees 

4:00 Adjourn

Agenda

December 6, 2017

1:00 – 1:15 Welcome & Introductions 

1:15 – 2:15 Cybersecurity Regulation, New York Department of Financial Services 

• Maria T. Vullo, Superintendent, New York Department of Financial 

Services

2:15 – 3:45 The Effect of Recent Natural Catastrophes on the Insurance Industry 

• Steve Murray, CEO, Florida Farm Bureau Insurance 

• John Kinney, Executive Vice President and Chief Claims Officer, 

The Hartford

3:45 –4:00 Break

4:00 – 4:45 U.S. Department of the Treasury: A Financial System That Creates

 Economic Opportunities, Asset Management and Insurance

• Jared Sawyer, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Financial Institutions

Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury 

• Steven Seitz, Deputy Director, Federal Insurance Office, 

U.S. Department of the Treasury 

4:45 – 4:55 Any Other Business

4:55 - 5:00 Adjourn
# Official Journal C 108E/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.108.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 108E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5514 April 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.108.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 108E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5514 April 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2012/C 108E/01 | Position (EU) No 7/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’Adopted by the Council on 8 March 2012 | 1 |
| 2012/C 108E/02 | Position (EU) No 8/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a single European railway areaAdopted by the Council on 8 March 2012 (1) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2012/C 108E/01

Position (EU) No 7/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’Adopted by the Council on 8 March 2012

1

2012/C 108E/02

Position (EU) No 8/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a single European railway areaAdopted by the Council on 8 March 2012 (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1073

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to exempt from

coverage under that Act individuals who are members of the Old Order

Amish.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. WALKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

to exempt from coverage under that Act individuals who

are members of the Old Order Amish.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION.

4 Section 3(6) of the Occupational Safety and Health

5 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 652(6) is amended by inserting

6 before the period the following: ‘‘but does not include an

7 individual who is a member of the Old Order Amish’’.

Æ
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution authorizing the President to

disapprove or reduce an item of appropriations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. POSHARD introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution authorizing

the President to disapprove or reduce an item of appropriations.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States
2

HJ 63 IH

1 within seven years after its submission to the States for

2 ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘The President may reduce or disapprove any item

5 of appropriation in any Act or joint resolution, except any

6 item of appropriation for the legislative branch of the Gov7 ernment. If any Act or joint resolution is approved by the

8 President, any item of appropriation contained therein

9 which is not reduced or disapproved shall become law. The

10 President shall return with his objections any item of ap11 propriation reduced or disapproved to the House in which

12 the Act or joint resolution containing such item originated.

13 The Congress may, in the manner prescribed under sec14 tion 7 of article I for Acts disapproved by the President,

15 reconsider any item disapproved or reduced under this ar16 ticle, except that only a majority vote of each House shall

17 be required to approve an item which has been dis18 approved or to restore an item which has been reduced

19 by the President to the original amount contained in the

20 Act or joint resolution.’’.

Æ
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 12, 2014

CONTACT: Treasury Public Affairs (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 

THROUGH NOVEMBER 12

WASHINGTON – The Deputies Committee of the Financial Stability Oversight Council 

(Council) today held a series of meetings at the Treasury Department regarding the Council’s 

nonbank financial company designations process. These meetings follow the Council’s direction 

to staff at its October 6 public meeting, and are part of the Council’s ongoing efforts to seek 

input from relevant stakeholders regarding potential changes to the process. 

Staff of Council members and member agencies met today with a variety of organizations, 

including representatives of: 

American Council of Life Insurers 

Americans for Financial Reform 

American Insurance Association 

Association of Institutional INVESTORS 

Better Markets 

Bipartisan Policy Center 

Financial Services Roundtable 

Investment Company Institute 

Managed Funds Association 

Property Casualty Insurers Association of America 

SIFMA Asset Management Group 

Systemic Risk Council 

U.S. Chamber of Commerce 

Today’s discussions provided staff an opportunity to hear a range of views directly from a 

variety of perspectives. In addition, Council staff has been discussing the process with others, 

including Congressional staff and previously designated companies. 
To date, conversations have focused on proposals presented to Council staff in three broad 

categories: engagement with companies under review during Stages 2 and 3 of the process; the 

annual reevaluations of previously designated companies; and the balance between informing the 

public of the Council’s work and protecting confidential, market-sensitive information relating to 

individual companies under consideration. 

Council staff will continue to engage with a variety of interested parties and firms regarding the 

process, before presenting to the Council any proposed or recommended changes. 

For a set of frequently asked questions regarding the Council’s nonbank financial company 

designations process, see the following: 

www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fsoc/designations/Pages/nonbank-faq.aspx. 

Additional information regarding the Council is available at www.fsoc.gov. 

###
# Official Journal C 58/8 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 58 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 488 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 58

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 488 March 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 058/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 058/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3648 — Gruner + Jahr/Motorpresse) (1) | 2 |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2005/C 058/3 | Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information from criminal records (COM (2004) 664 final of 13 October 2004) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 058/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 058/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3648 — Gruner + Jahr/Motorpresse) (1)

2

European Data Protection Supervisor

2005/C 058/3

Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information from criminal records (COM (2004) 664 final of 13 October 2004)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 102I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 102I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6424 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 102I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6424 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 102 I/01 | EU Drugs Strategy 2021-2025 – INTRODUCTION – Aim, foundations and approach | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 102 I/01

EU Drugs Strategy 2021-2025 – INTRODUCTION – Aim, foundations and approach

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)

                         OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

                    [PFL Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

June 1, 2000


PFL Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:    Privilege Select Variable Annuity
       PFL Life Variable Annuity Account E
       Registration on Form N-4; SEC File No. 333-32110

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Privilege Select Variable Annuity policies
are those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)    the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the
       policies,

(2)    the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
       policies,

(3)    the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and management
       of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that provides for a
       reasonable margin of  profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)    Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)   Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iii)  Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through
(iii) is established in the pricing of the Privilege Select Variable Annuity, to
achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of
industry practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.
<PAGE>

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred.  Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges.  In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the registration statement.



/s/ Calvin R. Birkey
-----------------------------
Calvin R. Birkey, FSA, MAAA
Managing Actuary
PFL Life Insurance Company