alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 154/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.154.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 154 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5217 June 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.154.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 154

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5217 June 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 of 25 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 of 25 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          49,332
<SECURITIES>                                    58,967
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,763
<PP&E>                                           7,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                     761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,593
<BONDS>                                          1,967
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,287
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,435)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,435)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,435)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.96)
        

</TABLE>
H. J. Res. 79

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Joint Resolution

To authorize the President to issue a proclamation designating the week beginning

on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994, as ‘‘National Family Week’’.

Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly

society;

Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family as a unit essential

to the continued well-being of the United States; and

Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the importance of family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President

is hereby authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the week beginning on November 21, 1993, and November 20, 1994 as ‘‘National Family Week’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
page1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

ERIC L ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS

AND UKG (ULTIMATE KRONOS 

GROUP)

Case No.: 

4:22-CV- 00864

NOTICE OF APPEAL

___________________________________________________

Notice is hereby given that Plaintiff Eric Ellis appeals to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the October 31, 2023 Order 

(“Order”) 20 2023 order that dismissed the Plaintiff’s Title VII 

discrimination claims without prejudice. Based on the whole record –

Case 4:22-cv-00864-Y Document 125 Filed 02/03/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1819
 page2

including the failure to grant leave to amend – the district court’s dismissal 

was final and appealable. The Plaintiff contends that the district court 

abused its discretion by dismissing the Plaintiff’s claims without prejudice 

but then nevertheless denying leave to amend without offering any 

justification. 

/s/Eric L. Ellis

Ericlamarellis@gmail.com

2.3.2024

8539 Melissa Dr 

Fort Worth, Tx 76108

3185075030

Case 4:22-cv-00864-Y Document 125 Filed 02/03/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1820
 page3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby affirm that on this 3rd of February 2024, the foregoing document 

was filed with the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.

/s/ Eric L. Ellis

Case 4:22-cv-00864-Y Document 125 Filed 02/03/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1821
Contents of CD

Test Type Report #

1-hr LC50 screen Dupont 26135

4-hr LC50 DuPont 17743-721

Cardiac sensitization DuPont 17743-1522

Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) DuPont 17743-501

In vitro chromosome aberration DuPont 17743-546

Pilot study for 4-hr LC50 DuPont 19179-700

Test Type Report #

2-hr Approximate lethal concentration (ALC) DuPont 21871

4-hr LC50 DuPont 26154 RV1

Cardiac sensitization DuPont 25453

Dermal irritation DuPont 22199

Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) DuPont 22597

In vitro chomosome aberration DuPont 22598

5-day inhalation range-finder DuPont 25309

28-day inhalation DuPont 25850

90-day inhalation DuPont 17453-785

Pre-natal development DuPont 17453-731

90-day inhalation NA

In vivo micronucleus NA

Ready biodegradability** A100560***

Partition coefficient** A100561***

Algae growth inhibition test** -

Fish acute toxicity test** -

Daphnia acute immobilization test** -

Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) DuPont 20711

Service Contract on Management of Construction and Demolition Waste-SR1 

http://eu-smr.eu/cdw/docs/BIO_Construction%20and%20Demolition%20Waste_Final%20report_09022011.pdf

Completed Studies CAS RN 66711-86-2 

Completed Studies CAS RN 692-49-9

On-going Studies CAS RN 692-49-9

Completed Studies CAS RN 407-60-3
# Official Journal C 29/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 29 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6223 January 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 29

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6223 January 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2019/C 29/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2019/C 29/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1

1

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his Official Capacity as 

Attorney General of the United States, et al.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Nicholas M. Bruno of Beck Redden LLP hereby moves to withdraw as counsel of record 

for Intervenors-Plaintiffs Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. Mr. 

Bruno no longer represents Intervenors-Plaintiffs. Intervenors-Plaintiffs continue to be 

represented by lead counsel Chad Flores of Flores Law PLLC. This withdrawal will not cause 

delay or prejudice to any party. For these reasons, the Court should order that Nicholas M. Bruno 

be withdrawn as counsel for Intervenor-Plaintiffs Defense Distributed and Second Amendment 

Foundation, Inc. and removed from the service list.

Respectfully submitted,

BECK REDDEN LLP

By: /s/ Nicholas M. Bruno

Nicholas M. Bruno

nbruno@beckredden.com

Texas Bar No. 24097432

1221 McKinney St., Suite 4500

Houston, Texas 77010-2010

Telephone: (713) 951-3700

Facsimile: (713) 951-3720

Withdrawing Counsel for Defense Distributed and 

Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 223 Filed 06/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4685
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of this motion was served on all counsel of record by 

the Court’s CM/ECF system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on June 1, 

2023.

/s/ Nicholas M. Bruno

Nicholas M. Bruno

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 223 Filed 06/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4686
Order –Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WILLIAM JOSEPH SUMMERVILLE, §

§

 Petitioner, §

§

v. §

§

 Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-02150-L-BT

BRYAN COLLIER and BOBBY 

LUMPKIN,

§

§

 Respondents. §

ORDER

The Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

(“Report”) (Doc. 33) was entered on December 6, 2023, recommending that the court construe 

Petitioner William J. Summerville’s (“Petitioner”) notice of withdrawal letter (“Letter”) (Doc. 32), 

filed August 10, 2023, as a motion for voluntarily dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), grant the

motion, and dismiss this action without prejudice. Doc. 33 at 1.

On September 27, 2022, Petitioner applied for federal habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254. Doc. 3. On July 18, 2023, the State responded, arguing that his claims are time barred, 

procedurally defaulted, and substantively meritless. Doc. 26 at 9-22. Petitioner did not reply to the 

State’s response; instead, he filed his Letter informing the court that he is “withdrawing his 

Petition” because he was “informed that [he has] not exhausted [his] state appeals.” Doc. 32 at 1. 

The magistrate judge construed the Letter as a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and recommended that the court grant the motion. Doc. 33 at 1, 

4. Petitioner did not file objections to the Report, and the time to do so has passed.

Having considered Petitioner’s Letter, Report, file, and record in this case, the court

determines that the magistrate judge’s finding and conclusions in the Report are correct and

Case 3:22-cv-02150-L-BT Document 34 Filed 12/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2069
Order –Page 2

acceptsthem as those of the court. Accordingly, the court construes Petitioner’s Letter as a motion 

for voluntary dismissal, grants the motion, and dismisses without prejudice his petition pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).

It is so ordered this 29th day of December, 2023.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-02150-L-BT Document 34 Filed 12/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2070
Exhibit 32.1



PlanVista Corporation



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Phillip S. Dingle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PlanVista Corporation (the
Company), and I, Bennett Marks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated: November 19, 2003 |  | /s/ Phillip S. Dingle                                             
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | Phillip S. Dingle Chairman and Chief Executive Officer            
|                         | 
|Dated: November 19, 2003 |  | /s/ Bennett Marks                                                 
|                         |  | Bennett Marks Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



58
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 17 November 2005

in Case C-476/04: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive No 2001/55/EC - Mass influx of displaced persons - Temporary protection - Minimum standards)

(2006/C 22/03)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-476/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Kontoy and C. O'Reilly) v Hellenic Republic (Agent: N. Dafniou) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 12 November 2004 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur), acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, U. Lõhmus and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 November 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 6 of 8.1.2005.

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lacey McCrae, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyerson, J.), rendered January 25, 1989, convicting him of attempted mur*640der in the second degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The People’s evidence of the events leading up to the shooting is undisputed and the identification of the defendant was unequivocally made by the complainant and his girlfriend who witnessed the entire altercation. This overwhelming evidence was not so contradicted by the defendant’s eyewitness, who did not actually see the shooting, to justify overturning the defendant’s conviction. There is sufficient evidence in the record, if credited by the court, to sustain its conclusion that defendant was the perpetrator. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
----

(2004/C 78 E/0087)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2194/03

by Michael Cashman (PSE) to the Commission

(26 June 2003)

Subject:   Counterfeiting and piracy

In January 2003, the Commission held a Forum on the prevention and combating of counterfeiting and piracy. What action is the Commission now planning with a view to enhancing cooperation under the third pillar in order to counter the illegal smuggling of goods liable to excise duty?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(29 July 2003)

Intellectual property violations such as counterfeiting and product piracy pose a major challenge in the fight against organised crime. They affect a broad variety of sectors. Counterfeiting and piracy are an international phenomenon which must be tackled as such.

On 30 January 2003 the Commission organised a meeting on the fight against piracy and counterfeiting in the context of the Forum on Organised Crime Prevention.

The meeting was attended by about a hundred experts and provided the opportunity for a constructive dialogue between representatives of business, national judicial authorities, the police, customs, and European and international organisations.

The conclusions of this meeting included:

As a follow-up to the Forum meeting on 30 January 2003, the Commission is working on a text to approximate penal sanctions at Union level and to improve cross-border cooperation between responsible authorities in the Member States.

This instrument will provide third pillar measures which are complementary to the proposal for a directive concerning the means of enforcing respect for intellectual property rights (1).

The Commission is also organising further meetings in order to enhance the fight against counterfeiting and product piracy and to maintain close working relations with Europol which has created a new working group in this field.

Concerning illegal smuggling of excised goods, such as cigarettes, a new procedure of exchange of information has entered into force between the world customs organisation (WCO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) on 1 July 2003 and will be in application as from 1 September 2003.

----

(1)  COM(2003)46 final.

----
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 40

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to permit

Congress to grant power to the Supreme Court to remove judges in

certain cases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to permit Congress to grant power to the Supreme

Court to remove judges in certain cases.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 40 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘The Congress may by law provide that the Supreme

3 Court may remove from office any judge of a court or4 dained and established under article III of this Constitu5 tion, if the Supreme Court determines that such judge

6 has been convicted in a Federal court of a criminal of7 fense.’’.

Æ
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00326-L

§

DEONTATE ALEX (23) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

DEONTATE ALEX is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, namely, Possession 

With Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the 

Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 30th day of October, 2024.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 603 Filed 10/30/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1907