alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.19
                                 MARIO F. ROSSI
                               22 SPLIT ROCK ROAD
                           TRUMBULL, CONNECTICUT 06611

December 31, 1999

SmartServ Online, Inc.
One Station Place
Stamford, Connecticut 06902

Gentlemen:

For good and valuable  consideration which is hereby  acknowledged,  I, Mario F.
Rossi,  agree to amend a certain  Restricted  Stock  Purchase  Agreement,  dated
December  28, 1998  between  myself and  SmartServ  Online,  Inc. to convert the
interest  portion of the note  obligation  thereunder for the payment of 206,080
shares of restricted  common stock from a non-recourse  obligation to a recourse
obligation.

Accordingly,  the  Promissory  Note  dated  December  29,  1998 in the amount of
$453,376.00 shall be cancelled and a new note in the amount of $152,499.20 shall
be executed.


Mario F. Rossi



---------------------------
Case 3:22-cr-00291-E Document 65 Filed 05/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 195
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 258 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 258

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              prohibiting retroactive increases in taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 1993

    Mr. Herger introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              prohibiting retroactive increases in taxes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. In the case of any provision of law which modifies the 
tax laws of the United States and which results in increased revenues 
to the United States--
            ``(1) no such modification of any income tax shall apply to 
        any taxable year beginning before the date of the enactment of 
        such modification, and
            ``(2) no such modification of any excise tax shall apply to 
        any event occurring before the date of the enactment of such 
        modification.
    ``Section 2. Section 1 of this article shall not apply to any law 
which the President of the United States declares at the time of 
signing is enacted pursuant to a national emergency.''

                                 <all>
```
----

(2004/C 84 E/0475)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0467/04

by Richard Corbett (PSE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Mission expenses

What were the mission expenses for (i) Members and (ii) staff of the Commission in respect of their attendance at part-sessions of the European Parliament held in Strasbourg (a) during 2001 and (b) during 2002?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(18 March 2004)

The breakdown of mission expenses necessitated by attendance at part-sessions of the European Parliament held in Strasbourg in 2001 and 2002 and by category was as follows:

The above expenses relate to measurable and billed costs of transport, accommodation, meals, and other expenditures such as telephone and fax use for work purposes.

----
Exhibit 10.7


 


CAPITOL ACQUISITION CORP. III


509 7th Street, N.W.


Washington, D.C. 20004


 


_______________, 2015


 


Venturehouse Group, LLC


509 7th Street, N.W.


Washington, D.C. 20004


 


Dryden Capital Management, LLC


305 West Pennsylvania Avenue


Towson, MD 21204


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Capitol Acquisition
Corp. III (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of
an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement)
(such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Venturehouse Group, LLC and Dryden
Capital Management, LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may
be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 509 7th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004 (or any successor
location) and 305 West Pennsylvania Avenue, Towson, Maryland 21204 (or any successor location), respectively. In exchange therefore,
the Company shall pay Venturehouse Group, LLC and Dryden Capital Management, LLC the sum of $7,500 per month and $2,500 per month,
respectively, on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Each of Venturehouse Group, LLC
and Dryden Capital Management, LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to
any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon
the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a
result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the
Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	CAPITOL ACQUISITION CORP. III
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
	 	 	Name: L. Dyson Dryden
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer



 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


VENTUREHOUSE GROUP, LLC


 





	By:		 
	 	Name: Mark D. Ein	 
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 



 


DRYDEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,
LLC


 


	By:		 
	 	Name: L. Dyson Dryden	 
	 	Title: Sole Member
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk August 28, 2012

t0828 

# Order

August 28, 2012

145755

THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 145755

BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS,

DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS, and

SECRETARY OF STATE,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered and, pursuant to

MCR 7.302(H)( 1), in lieu of granting relief on the complaint, we DIRECT the Clerk to

schedule oral argument on August 30, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., on whether to grant relief or

take other peremptory action. At oral argument the parties shall include among the issues

addres sed whether the republication requirement of Const 1963, art 12, § 2 and MCL

168.482(3), requiring that petitions set forth any other existing provisions of the

constitution that would be altered or abrogated by the proposed amendment, has been

satisfied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-021-01-H

DAVID YBANEZ, JR.,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMEIYDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OXl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

oateatprtCzozz.

JAMES SLEYHENDRIX

UNI STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I

Case 5:22-cr-00021-H-BQ Document 26 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THEFINANCIAL
OFFICER OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
Janice B. Trouba, Chief Financial Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)        The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, which this
statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)        The
information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp, Inc.

|Date:  May 8, 2006 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By: /s/ Janice B. Trouba
      Janice B. TroubaIts:  Chief Financial Officer
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### JACKSON et al. v. RICORD.

No. 11015.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 11, 1941.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1941.

Joe Burkett, of San Antonio, and Joe Burkett, Jr., of Kerrville, for appellants.

Fred Felty and John Peace, Jr., both of San Antonio, for appellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. When the question of privilege is raised by plea, it is necessary that said plea be “sworn to” (Art. 2007, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats.), and that the “affidavit of the facts sworn to must be so direct and unequivocal as that an indictment for perjury would lie, if the oath is falsely made.” Witt & Sons v. Stith, Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W. 1076, 1078; Smith v. Banks, Tex.Civ.App., 152 S.W. 449; Whitemore & Co. v. Wilson, 1 Posey Unrep.Cas. 213.

From the notary’s certificate ' appended to the plea of privilege here involved, it appears that appellants did not swear that the allegations of the plea of privilege were true, but that they acknowledged to the notary public “that they executed the same (presumedly the plea of privilege) for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.”

As “a plea of privilege not properly sworn to would not authorize a court to change the venue, as such an instrument would be without any probative , force” (Rogers v. Alexander, Tex.Civ.App., 289 S.W. 1070, 1071), we conclude that the trial court entered the proper order, which is accordingly affirmed.

*911On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellants contend that the defect in the plea of privilege pointed out in the original opinion must now be considered as waived ■or cured, because appellee filed no exception to said plea in the court below. This contention is overruled. In order to place the onus of proof of the venue facts upon a plaintiff, it is necessary that the plea of privilege be “accompanied with the statutory requisite of an oath.” Drew v. Harrison & Bros., 12 Tex. 279. See, also, 33 Tex.Jur. 624, § 173; 43 Tex.Jur. 803, § 78.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing is overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 263 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 263

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide for a runoff election if no candidate receives more than 50 
                percent of the popular vote nationally.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1993

    Mr. Duncan introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide for a runoff election if no candidate receives more than 50 
                percent of the popular vote nationally.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Chief Justice of the United States shall declare 
that a runoff election is necessary if no candidates for President and 
Vice President of the United States receive more than 50 percent of the 
popular vote cast for President and Vice President nationally at the 
general election.
    ``Section 2. If the Chief Justice of the United States declares 
that a runoff election is necessary, the electors of President and Vice 
President of the United States shall be appointed based on the popular 
vote cast at a runoff election in each State and the District 
constituting the seat of Government of the United States.
    ``Section 3. The runoff election shall be between the candidates 
who receive the greatest number of popular votes cast for President and 
Vice President nationally at the general election and the candidates 
who receive the second greatest number of popular votes cast for 
President and Vice President nationally at the general election and 
shall be held 14 calendar days after the date on which the general 
election is held.
    ``Section 4. In both a general election and a runoff election, each 
vote shall be cast for two persons who have consented to the joining of 
their names on the ballot as candidates for President and Vice 
President. No candidate shall consent to the joining of his or her name 
with the name of more than one other person.''.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cr-00387-M Document 15 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 33
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Northeast Indiana
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Randy J. Sizemore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



By: /s/ Randy J. Sizemore
---------------------------
Name: Randy J. Sizemore
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE 39-WEEK PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                          13,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                       889
<INVENTORY>                                     20,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,588
<PP&E>                                          22,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,975
<BONDS>                                         10,294
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,575
<SALES>                                         73,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,952
<CGS>                                           56,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    23
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                       987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                842
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       842
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Submission Deadline for International Slots for the 
Winter 2000/2001 Scheduling Season

AGENCY:  Department of Transportation, FAA.

ACTION:  Notice of submission deadline.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On October 1, 1999, the FAA amended the regulations governing 
takeoff and landing slots and slot allocation procedures at certain 
High Density Traffic Airports as a result of the ``Open Transborder'' 
Agreement between the Government of the United States and the 
Government of Canada. One element of this final rule established that 
the deadline for submission of requests for international slots will be 
published in a Federal Register notice for each scheduling season. The 
purpose of the amendment is for the FAA deadline for international 
slots requests to coincide with the International Air Transport 
Association deadline for submission of international requests. In 
accordance with this amendment, the FAA announces in this notice that 
the deadline for submitting requests for international slots for 
allocation under 14 CFR 93.217 is May 10, 2000.

DATES:  Requests for international slots must be submitted no later 
than May 10, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Requests may be submitted by mail to Slot Administration 
Office, AGC-230, Office of the Chief Counsel, 800 Independence Ave., 
SW., Washington, DC 20591; facsimile: 202-267-7668; ARING: DCAYAXD; 
email address: 9-A <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5f2e488d6c9cad1c4c1c8cccbe5c3c4c48bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ebbcaac69887849f8a8f868285ab8d8a8ac58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Lorelei D. Peter, Airspace and Air 
Traffic Law Branch, Regulations Division, Office of the Chief Counsel, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone number: 202-267-3073.

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 3, 2000.
James W. Whitlow,
Deputy Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-2957 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Globallly Integrated Exercises: Optimizing Joint Force C2 Structure

/ Published Feb. 12, 2019
"Globally Integrated Exercises: Optimizing Joint Force C2 Structure"
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

On December 19, 2022, this Court issued an Order (ECF No. 137) granting Defense 

Distributed and the Second Amendment Foundation’s motion to intervene. In view of that Order, 

the Intervenors are ORDERED to file their Complaint on the docket no later than December 23, 

2022. 

SO ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 139 Filed 12/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1876
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 98

To authorize the National Committee of American Airmen Rescued by General

Mihailovich to establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. DORNAN, and Mr. ACKERMAN) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House

Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the National Committee of American Airmen

Rescued by General Mihailovich to establish a memorial

in the District of Columbia or its environs.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The National Committee of Amer5 ican Airmen Rescued by General Mihailovich is authorized

6 to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District
2

•HJ 98 IH

1 of Columbia or its environs to honor General Draza

2 Mihailovich.

3 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO4 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall

5 be in accordance with the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide

6 standards for placement of commemorative works on cer7 tain Federal lands in the District of Columbia and its en8 virons, and for other purposes’’, approved November 14,

9 1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).

10 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

11 The National Committee of American Airmen Res12 cued by General Mihailovich shall be solely responsible for

13 acceptance of contributions for, and payment of the ex14 penses of, the establishment of the memorial. No Federal

15 funds may be used to pay any expense of the establish16 ment of the memorial.

17 SEC. 3. DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.

18 If, upon payment of all expenses of the establishment

19 of the memorial (including the maintenance and preserva20 tion amount provided for in section 8(b) of the Act re21 ferred to in section 1(b)), or upon expiration of the author22 ity for the memorial under section 10(b) of such Act, there

23 remains a balance of funds received for the establishment

24 of the memorial, the National Committee of American Air25 men Rescued by General Mihailovich shall transmit the
3

•HJ 98 IH

1 amount of the balance to the Secretary of the Treasury

2 for deposit in the account provided for in section 8(b)(1)

3 of such Act.

Æ