alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A CD is included in this entry. It contains the EPA's Light-Duty Vehicle Simulation Tool, intended for use 

in estimating A/C and off-cycle credits, and an instruction. The tool is capable of performing single 

simulation runs only at this time. It is currently being upgraded to extend its capability to include batch 

simulation runs as well as additional simulation options to the users for the final rule.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 398 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 398

      To establish the fourth Sunday of July as ``Parents' Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1994

Mr. Burton of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Flake, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Barrett 
  of Nebraska, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mrs. Fowler, Mrs. 
 Vucanovich, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Hochbrueckner, Mr. 
Jefferson, Mrs. Meek, Mr. Cox, Mr. Dornan, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Moran, and 
 Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin), introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      To establish the fourth Sunday of July as ``Parents' Day''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the fourth Sunday of 
every July shall be established as ``Parents' Day'' to be recognized as 
a recurring, perennial day of commemoration.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION.

    All private citizens, organizations, and governmental and 
legislative bodies at the local, State, and Federal level are 
encouraged to recognize Parents' Day through proclamations, activities, 
and educational efforts in furtherance of recognizing, uplifting, and 
supporting the role of parents in the rearing of their children.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

#### **CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBINES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Phoenix Gold International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith A. Peterson,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Keith A. Peterson   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Keith A. Peterson       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | February 12, 2003       |

 

----
#### Orville RATLEY, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 21697.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1941.

Taylor, Irwin & Irwin, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

Appellant has filed his affidavit stating that he no longer desires to prosecute and desires to withdraw his appeal.

The motion is granted and the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an                           ( print page 70356)                        application for license as Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515).                 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. 

Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant: MTS Logistics, Inc., 390 Fifth Avenue, Suite 701, New York, NY 10018, Officers: Sedat Saka, President (Qualifying Individual), Timur Fidan, Secretary. 

Dated: November 16, 2000. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-29820 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 67436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27000]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No 367]

Delegation of Authority With Respect to Administration and 
Enforcement of Immigration and Nationality Laws Relating to Powers, 
Duties and Functions of Diplomatic and Consular Officers

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including by Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, 
as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and by the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (INA), I hereby delegate certain authorities to the Assistant 
Secretary for Consular Affairs:
    (1) To the extent authorized by law, and subject to the limitations 
contained in section 104 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1104) outlined in 
paragraph (2) of this delegation, and in section 428 of the Homeland 
Security Act (6 U.S.C. 236), I delegate to the Assistant Secretary for 
Consular Affairs authority for the administration and enforcement of 
the INA and all other immigration and nationality laws relating to the 
powers, duties and functions of diplomatic and consular officers of the 
United States, as well as any actions necessary to implement 
responsibilities of the Department of State, including consular 
officers, under the INA, including but not limited to establishing 
forms and publishing implementing regulations.
    (2) There are hereby excluded from the authority delegated under 
paragraph (1) of this order: (a) The powers, duties, and functions 
conferred upon consular officers relating to the granting or refusal of 
visas; (b) authorities requiring the Secretary to determine that a 
matter is in the national interest or would affect U.S. foreign policy, 
relations, or interests; and (c) powers, duties, and functions 
designated by statute that are to be exercised solely by the Secretary 
or specified officers.
    (3) The authorities covered by this delegation of authority may be 
re-delegated, to the extent authorized by law.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, 
and the Under Secretary for Management may at any time exercise any 
authority or function delegated by this delegation of authority.
    No other delegations of authority are affected by this delegation 
of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: September 17, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-27000 Filed 11-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-340-X

§

ANTONIO MARCEL LEWIS (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of 

Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of 

the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of 

service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is 

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and ANTONIO MARCEL 

LEWIS (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (18 U.S.C. § 659) – Conspiracy to Commit Theft 

from Interstate Shipement. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☐ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

 The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who 

set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under 

§ 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination 

of whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) 

why the defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by 

clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the 

United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 7th day of July, 2023.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00340-X Document 71 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 135
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Endocardial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Bullock,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ James W.  Bullock   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | James W. Bullock        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 9, 2004          |

 

1

----
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

September 30, 2021

2021 PREEMPTION REPORT

FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE

The Federal Insurance Office (FIO) issues this report on actions taken regarding preemption of 

inconsistent state insurance measures, pursuant to the Federal Insurance Office Act of 2010.1

During the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021, FIO did not take any action regarding the 

preemption of any inconsistent state insurance measure.

1 31 U.S.C. § 313(n)(l).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRAIG BRUCE Mc KINNEY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

RICK MARTINEZ, individually and as an

officer of Fire Extinguisher Service Center,

LLC; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 15620

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 00448

- MMD

VPC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2017 **

Before: McKEOWN , WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Craig Bruce McKinney appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of

his action alleging Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”)

and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 1291. We review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 1 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 15620

novo. Resnick v. Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A); Jones v. Blanas , 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal

based on the applicable statute of limitations). We affirm.

The dis trict court properly dismissed McKinney’s action as time

- barred

because McKinney failed to file his action within the applicable statute of

limitations. See Pincay v. Andrews , 238 F.3d 1106, 1108

- 09 (9th Cir. 2001) (civil

RICO claims have a four

- year stat ute of limitations, which begins to run when a

plaintiff knows or should have known of the injury underlying the action);

Grimmett v. Brown , 75 F.3d 506, 515

- 16 (9th Cir. 1996) ( civil RICO claims were

not tolled during the pendency of a prior judicial action because the prior judicial

action was not a perquisite to review in federal court).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court

.

See United States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts

not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
Alternative Views on Isssuance Modeling

Jonathan H. Wright

Panel Discussion: Roundtable on Treasury

Markets and Debt Management

November 19, 2015
Introduction

Term structure models can answer key

questions on optimal management.
Introduction

Term structure models can answer key

questions on optimal management.

Model uncertainty is a problem.

Models have difficulty pinning down long-run

expectation of short rates.
Introduction

Term structure models can answer key

questions on optimal management.

Model uncertainty is a problem.

Models have difficulty pinning down long-run

expectation of short rates.

Incorporating information from surveys helps.
Expected 10-Year Borrowing Costs from

Term Structure Model: 9/2015

3-month 2.03

2-year 2.16

5-year 2.38

10-year 2.14
Expected 10-Year Borrowing Costs from

Term Structure Model: 12/1999

3-month 5.11

2-year 5.71

5-year 6.06

10-year 6.70
Complications

Treasury wants stable issuance.

Issuance affects yields.

Not a one-shot decision.

I Short issuance gives option value of reoptimizing.

Rollover risk.
PDF of 10-year average of 3 month rates

from Term Structure Model: 9/2015

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

Percent Per Annum

Probability
Nominal v. TIPS Issuance

Treasury minimizing expected cost should issue

TIPS if breakeven is greater than expected

inflation.

Irrelevant whether difference reflects inflation

risk premium or TIPS liquidity premium.
Are TIPS a good deal for Treasury? 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

Percent Per Annum

10 Y Breakeven

10 Y SPF Inflation Expectations
# CE2004084EN.01011801.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/118 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/118

---

(2004/C 84 E/0154)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3930/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Retention of privileges by the Agricultural Bank of Greece

Subject:

Under Article 26(4) of N 1914/1990, ‘all the special arrangements which apply to the Agricultural Bank of Greece, with particular reference to its substantive and procedural privileges, to its immunities in respect of tax and other matters, to its debt instruments, to the guaranteeing of its debts and in general to its legal personality as an entity possessing rights and subject to obligations’ remain in force and are applied unchanged even following the conversion of the Agricultural Bank of Greece (ATE) into a limited liability company. On the basis of this provision the ATE, in its transactions with its customers, makes use of the privileges granted to it by Articles 8 — 15 and 34(8) of N 4332/1929, under which the legal, procedural and substantive guarantees for those dealing with the ATE, and in particular its debtors, are set aside. The Commission has also received a complaint on this subject from the firm Tipopiitiria Thivas A.E. (reply from the Agriculture Directorate-General No 31427/24.11.2003).

Since the retention and application by the ATE of the above-mentioned privileges, which is contrary to Community law, is onerous for those doing business with it and deprives them of all rights of defence, what does the Commission intend to do to put a stop to the violation of the rights of those dealing with the ATE and to eliminate the distortion of competition conditions with respect to other credit institutions?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(26 January 2004)

(26 January 2004)

The Commission confirms that it has just received a complaint concerning the Agricultural Bank of Greece and therefore is conducting a detailed investigation of the problem raised by the Honourable Member and will inform him of the outcome as soon as possible.

---
Case 1:22-cr-00054-H-BU Document 200 Filed 06/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 600
Exhibit 10.1


 





RESIGNATION of the DIRECTOR


of


PARADIGM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION


 


The following
is a true copy of the resignation of the Director of the Corporation, held on this 11th of September, 2015.


 


I, TAKANORI
(TED) OZAKI, do hereby formally RESIGN as Director and CEO and any other corporate affiliation and do hereby sever any and all
official ties, duties, obligations or liabilities regarding PARADIGM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and do hereby, by affixing,
my signature hereto, officially as my last corporate act, DO HEREBY RESIGN.


 


DATED: 11th September, 2015


 


 


/s/
Takanori Ozaki                             


TAKANORI OZAKI
Agenda – November 2009 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings Thursday, October 29, 2009 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to noon on Wednesday, October 

28, 2009 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and Fabiola.Ravazzolo@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not 

scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

Low/High 

October-December / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

January - March / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

FY 2010 Total Marketable Borrowing / 

FY 2011 Total Marketable Borrowing / 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

FY 2010 / 

FY 2011 / 

FY 2012 / 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

3-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

10-year note (Nov) / 

10-year note reopening (Dec/Jan) / / - / 

30-year bond (Nov) / 

30-year bond reopening (Dec/Jan) / 

2-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

5-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

7-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

10-year TIPS (Jan) / 

20-year TIPS (Jan) / 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill size (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

Total change in bills outstanding Nov 09 – Jan 10 / 

Total change in bills outstanding FY 2010 / 

CMB issuance Nov 09 – Jan 10 (size/date) / / / / 

Please provide your estimates in the format provided above with central estimates followed by low/high 

estimates for each. 

Discussion Topics

1. What adjustments to debt issuance, if any, should Treasury make in consideration of its financing needs in 

the short, medium, and long term? 

2. Over the past year, Treasury has had to reschedule some bill auctions to 11:30 a.m. from 1:00 p.m. Do 

you believe it would be beneficial for Treasury to move all Treasury bill auctions to 11:30 a.m.? Discuss 

potential benefits and considerations if such a change was made. 

3. Treasury is considering potential changes to the TIPS program, including a replacement of 20-year TIPS 

with 30-year TIPS. What considerations should Treasury keep in mind if it decides to implement such a 

change? More broadly, are there other changes regarding TIPS issuance that Treasury should also be 

evaluating?
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2314

In re: RICHARD B. MARTIN, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Extraordinary Writ.

Submitted: January 19, 2021 Decided: January 26, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard B. Martin, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard B. Martin, Jr., petitions for an extraordinary writ, see 28 U.S.C. § 1651; 

Fed. R. App. P. 21, seeking an order declaring him an officer of the federal judiciary and 

providing him protection, on threat of criminal prosecution, from impediments to his pro 

se civil litigation. We conclude that Martin is not entitled to an extraordinary writ for the 

relief he seeks.

The All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, authorizes the federal courts to “issue all writs 

necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages 

and principles of law.” “The authority to issue a writ under the All Writs Act is not a font 

of jurisdiction.” United States v. Denedo, 556 U.S. 904, 914 (2009). Rather, this court’s 

authority to issue extraordinary writs under the All Writs Act “is only incidental to and in 

aid of [its] appellate jurisdiction, which Congress has given it over district courts, and 

administrative boards and agencies.” Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 

F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam) (citations omitted); see Parr v. United States, 

351 U.S. 513, 520 (1956).

The relief sought by Martin is not available by way of an extraordinary writ. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for extraordinary writ. We deny Martin’s motion to 

strike and deny as moot his motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED