alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MARTREY BASS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4147

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank E. Sheffield, Judge.

Richard A. Greenberg of Greenberg, Kirk & Caldwell, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert "Charlie" Lee, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
# Official Journal C 15/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 15 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 15

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 January 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 15/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9636 — American Securities/Lindsay Goldberg/AECOM Management Services) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 15/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9274 — GlaxoSmithKline/Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Business) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2020/C 15/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9667 — BlackRock Group/Raffles/Kellas Group) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 15/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9636 — American Securities/Lindsay Goldberg/AECOM Management Services) (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 15/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9274 — GlaxoSmithKline/Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Business) (
  1
  )

1

2

2020/C 15/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9667 — BlackRock Group/Raffles/Kellas Group) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 15/04 | Euro exchange rates — 15 January 2020 | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 15/04

Euro exchange rates — 15 January 2020

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 15/05 | Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 5 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 15/05

Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# AGENCY:

 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

 Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of antidumping duty administrative review. 

# SUMMARY:

 The Department of Commerce is extending the time limit for the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise, and the period of review May 1, 1998 through April 30, 1999. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 Febraury 9, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Thomas Killiam or Robert James, Enforcement Group III, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3019 or 482-0649, respectively. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 We initiated the review on June 30, 1999 (64 FR 35125) following a request made by the petitioners on May 28, 1999. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act directs the Department to make a preliminary determination within 245 days for each administrative review. The section provides, however, that if it is not practicable to complete the review within the foregoing time, the administering authority may extend that 245-day period to 365 days. Due to the reasons enumerated in the Memorandum from Richard Weible to Joseph A. Spetrini, Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan, Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results, dated January 28, 2000, the Department has determined that it is not practicable to complete this review within the 245-day time limit. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the time limits for the preliminary results of the administrative review by 120 days to May 30, 2000. 

Dated: January 28, 2000.

Richard O. Weible,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.

[FR Doc. 00-2972 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of May 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asMaster Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-C28 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during theperiod from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the MasterServicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL DARNELI, JONES.

Plaintiff,

ESTHER GORMAN, E/,4/,,

Defendants Civil Action No . 3 :22-CY - 187 5 -C

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United

States Magistrate Judge advising the Court that Plaintifls pending motion [ECF No. 25],

construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

59(e), should be denied. Plaintiff failed to timely file objections to the Magistrate Judge's

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation.

The Court conducts a de novo review ofthose portions of the Magistrate Judge's report or

specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C.

S 636(bXl)(C). Portions ofthe report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the

subject ofa timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson,864 F .2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

The Court has conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's thorough and

well-reasoned findings and conclusions and finds no elror. It is therefore ORDERED that the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and

Case 3:22-cv-01875-C-BT Document 27 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 197
conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff s pending motion entitled "File

Motiolrs to Refilc in Another Court who has .lurisdiction in this Mattcr Rule 4l(b)" is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

J/

Dated this day of'November, 2023. -L

R.

o

GS

STATES D JUDGE

/

t,

.?

a ' 7'7 4

Case 3:22-cv-01875-C-BT Document 27 Filed 11/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 198
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70611-70612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29984]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The ATM Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 29, 2000, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The ATM Forum has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership 
status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Ascom 
Transmission AG, Berne, SWITZERLAND; Catena Networks, Kanata, Ontario, 
CANADA; Coreon, Inc., Fremont, CA; Sedona Networks, Kanata, Ontario, 
CANADA; and Turin Networks, Petaluma, CA have been added as parties to 
this venture. The following auditing member has upgraded to a principal 
member: Ascom Transmission AG, Bern, SWITZERLAND. The following members 
have changed their names: Mitel Semiconductor to Mitel Corporation, 
Kanata, Ontario, CANADA; and Harris & Jeffries to Netplane Systems, 
Inc., Dedham, MA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and The ATM Forum intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 19, 1993, The ATM Forum filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section

[[Page 70612]]

6(b) of the Act on June 2, 1993 (58 FR 31415).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 7, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 11, 2000 (65 FR 49262).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-29984 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
Froikin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bray.Dave@epa.gov, Scott Hedges/R10/USEPA/US@EPA, Nancy Helm/R10/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/30/2010 01:11 PM

Subject: Re: TIME SENSITIVE -GHG PSD SIP Call -Need quick verification from Regions

I reviewed this document and we have provided information responsive to the comments from Alaska, Idaho, and

Oregon. The only comments for these RiO states are the letters from the states themselves describing their lack ofauthority to issue PSD permits to GHG sources without conducting a rulemaking and the status of their rulemakingefforts.

Julie A. Vergeront

Office of Regional Counsel

U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, ORC-158

Seattle, WA 98101

Phone (206) 553-1497Fax (206) 553-0163

Confidential communication for internal deliberations only; attorney-client privilege, attorney work product and/orenforcement privilege; do not distribute outside EPA or DOJ

From: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Ida McDonnell/R1/USEPA/US@EPA, Donald Dahl/R1/USEPA/US@EPA, Ronald Fein/R1/USEPA/US@EPA, Gregg

Worley/R4/USEPA/US@ EPA,

Vera Kornylak/R4/USEPA/US@EPA, Heather Abrams/R4/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeffrey Robinson/R6/USEPA/US@EPA,

Ad in a

Wiley/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynde Schoellkopf/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, MarkA Smith/R7/USEPA/US@EPA, Joshua

Tapp/R7/USEPA/US@EPA,

Robert Patrick/R7/USEPA/US@EPA, Gerardo Rios/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Ann Lyons/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Laura

Yannayon/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Carl Daly/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Mike Owens/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara

Laumann/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Nancy

Helm/R10/USEPA/US@EPA, Dave Bray/R10/USEPA/US@EPA, Julie Vergeront/R10/USEPA/US@EPA

1
p

Comments document. We appreciate all your help in developing the State specific Info and response to

comments that you had sent earlier which has been incorporated in to the “Supplemental Information Document”

Attached is a draft of the RTC document. Please quickly review the state specific comments on pages 38-45 and

confirm that you had provided responses to all the comments pertaining to your states.

Please send Lisa, Howard and me an e-mail confirming that you had addressed all comments in your earlier submittal or

providing responses to any comments you may have missed. Since we need to finalize this on Tuesday (for signature on

Wednesday) I am asking that you respond by cob Monday.

If you have any questions, please call Lisa Sutton or me.

[attachment “GHG SIP Fix_RTC_draft 11-23-2010_1738.doc” deleted by Julie Vergeront/R10/USEPA/US) Thanks a lot.

raj

Raj Rao, P.E.

Group Leader, NSRG

OAQPS/AQPD(M D- C504-03)

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709

919-541-5344

919-541-5509 fax

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy, Interagency deliberative and Confidential.

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

 

ROBERT L. KIRKLAND, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-759-O-BP

 § 

COMMISSIONER OF §

SOCIAL SECURITY, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. 

Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED

for further administrative proceedings.

SO ORDERED on this 10th day of May, 2023.

Case 4:22-cv-00759-O Document 23 Filed 05/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3346
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein,
Justices 

# Order

April 17, 2015

149800

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149800 COA: 309729 Wayne CC: 06

- 007375

- FC DAWAN TYNER, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to ap peal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with its April 12, 2012 order granting the defendant’s motion for new trial and relief from judgment.

A trial c ourt’s decision to grant a new trial based upon newly

- discovered evidence

is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See People v Terrell , 289 Mich App 553, 558 (2010), lv den 489 Mich 858 (2011). An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court’s

decisio n is outside the range of principled outcomes. People v Musser , 494 Mich 337, 348 (2013). Here, the trial court held that three statements by Carlos Strong to his mother, Carol Turner, and his former girlfriend, Rasheedah Pearson, constituted excited

utt erances. Those statements indicated that defendant was not at the crime scene on the night of the shooting. Finding that the statements satisfied the test for newly

- discovered evidence, including that they would make a different result reasonably probabl e on retrial, the trial court ordered a new trial. See People v Cress , 468 Mich 678 (2003). The Court of Appeals erred by substituting its own opinion of the credibility and veracity of

the witnesses for that of the trial court. Given the trial court’s superior position to assess the credibility and veracity of the witnesses, i ts determination that the newly

- discovered evidence would make a different result probable on retrial was not so egregious that it was outside the range of principled outcomes. Pe ople v Babcock , 469 Mich 247, 269 (2003). See also Alder v Flint City Coach Lines, Inc , 364 Mich 29, 38 (1961) (C ARR

, J.,I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 17, 2015

s0414 2

Clerk concurring) (“This Court has repeatedly held that a trial judge, in passing on a motion for a new trial, is vested with a large discretion. The wisdom of such rule is obvious. The judge has the advantage of seeing the witnesses on the stand, of listening to their testimony, of noting the attitude of the jury to various matters that may arise during the trial, and is in far better position than is an appellate court to pass on questions of possible prejudice, sympathy, and matters generally that occur in the course of a trial but which do not appear of record.”).

M C C ORMACK , J., not participating because of her prior involvement in this case as counsel for a party.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Digital Applications,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly  period ending  September
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Kelvin  Choon-Huat  Ng,  Chief  Accounting  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Kelvin Choon-Huat Ng

Kelvin Choon-Huat Ng
Chief Accounting Officer
November 19, 2008

                                       25
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 7, 2020 

# Order

Clerk January 7, 2020

15 8751 (125) ( 129 )

COUNCIL OF ORGANIZATIONS AND

OTHERS FOR EDUCATION ABOUT

PAROCHIAID, AMERICAN CIVIL

LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN,

MICHIGAN PARENTS FOR SCHOOLS,

482FORWARD, MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION

OF SCHOOL BOARDS, MICHIGAN

ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL

ADMINISTRATORS, MICHIGAN

ASSOCIATION OF INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

ADMINISTRATORS, MICHIGAN SCHOOL

BUSINESS OFFICIALS, MICHIGAN

ASSOCIATION OF SECONDARY SCHOOL

PRINCIPALS, MIDDLE CITIES EDUCATION

ASSOCIATION, MICHIGAN ELEMENTARY

AND MIDDLE SCHOOL PRINCIPALS

ASSOCIATION, KALAMAZOO PUBLIC

SCHOOLS and KALAMAZOO PUBLIC

SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

SC: 158751

v COA: 343801

Ct of Claims: 17

- 000068

- MB

STATE OF MICHIGAN, GOVERNOR,

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, and

SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC

INSTRUCTION,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the separate motion s of amici curiae Attorney General

Dana Nessel and the Michigan Catholic Conference et al . for oral argument are

GRANTED. Attorney General Nessel shall have five minutes of oral argument and the

Michigan Catholic Conference et al . shall have ten minutes of oral argument separate from

that of the parties

.
NO. 6-14-00105CR

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COURT 

§

vs. § OF APPEALS

§

TIMOTHY BATES § SIXTH APPELATE DISTRICT

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Timothy Bates, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and

moves this Court to grant and extension of time to file Appellant's brief pursuant to Rule 38.6 of

the Texas Rules of Appellant Procedure and for good cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Hunt County,

Texas;

2. The case below was styled State of Texas vs. Timothy Bates, Cause

Number CR1301437.

3. Appellant was convicted of Driving While Intoxicated.

4. Appellant was sentenced to 180 days in jail probated for two years and a

$400 fine.

5. Notice of Appeal was given on June 12, 2014.

6. The Clerk's record was filed on July 7, 2014; The Reporter's record was

filed on November 18, 2014.

7. Appellant's brief is currently due on December 19, 2014

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of 30 days from the current due

ACCEPTED

06-14-00105-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

1/6/2015 4:37:19 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/6/2015 4:37:19 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
date.

9. No extension has previously been requested in this case.

10. Appellant is not currently incarcerated.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the extension

requested:

 Appellant's attorney, Jessica Edwards, has received the record but has had

insufficient time to adequately examine the record in order to effectively prepare a brief in this

case.

 Counsel would also show this court that, since receiving the record in this case,

counsel became very ill with infectious colitis which required two separate hospital stays for

treatment. Additionally, the Thanksgiving holiday fell between the time of receiving the record

and the due date of Appellant's brief.

 WHEREFORE, PREMISIS CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Court

would grant Appellant's Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such other and

further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

_/s/ Jessica Edwards_____________

Jessica Edwards SBN: 24000994

P.O. Box 9318

Greenville, Texas 75404

Tel: (903) 513-0510

Fax: (903) 200-1359

E-Mail: jessicaedwardslaw@gmail.com

Attorney for Timothy Bates

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on January 7, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing document was served on the Hunt County Attorney's Office, by hand delivery.

 /s/ Jessica Edwards 

Jessica Edwards