alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 1 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 1

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Edwards of California (for himself, Mrs. Schroeder, Mr. Ackerman, 
    Mr. Andrews of Texas, Mr. Andrews of New Jersey, Mr. Bacchus of 
   Florida, Mr. Beilenson, Mr. Berman, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Coleman, Mr. 
Conyers, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Dellums, Mr. Dicks, Mr. Evans, Mr. Fazio, Mr. 
Frost, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. 
Jacobs, Mrs. Kennelly, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Matsui, 
Mr. Mineta, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Shays, 
    Ms. Slaughter, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Stark, Mr. Swift, Mr. Towns, Mrs. 
Unsoeld, and Mr. Foglietta) introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This article shall take effect two years after the 
date of ratification.''.

                                 <all>
```
Agenda – February 2016 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – January 28 - January 29, 2016 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, January 25, 2016 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov and NY.QTR@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this 

quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

 Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 Low/High 

 January-March 2016 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 April-June 2016 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 FY 2016 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

 FY 2017 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 FY 2018 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

 FY 2016 / 

 FY 2017 / 

 FY 2018 / 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2017 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2017 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

 3-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 10-year note (Feb) / 

 10-year note reopening (Mar/Apr) / / - / 

 30-year bond (Feb) / 

 30-year bond reopening (Mar/Apr) / / 

 2-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 5-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 7-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 5-year TIPS (Apr) 

 10-year TIPS reopening (Mar) 

 30-year TIPS (Feb) 

 2-year FRN reopening (Feb/Mar) 

 2-year FRN (Apr) 

 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates 

 (February/March/March/April) / / / / / - / / 

 Total change in bills outstanding 2/16- 4/16 / 

 Total change in bills outstanding FY 2016 / 

 CMB issuance Feb‘16 – Apr ‘16 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics 

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2016 and FY2017. Do you believe the current financing 

schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s financing needs though the end of FY2016? 

2. In November 2015, Treasury reaffirmed its commitment to increasing bill issuance substantially. How much additional 

bill issuance can be accommodated by the market over the remainder of FY2016 without resulting in a significant change 

in bill yields relative to other money market yields? Given current deficit projections, nominal coupon or TIPS issuance 

may need to be reduced in order accommodate an increase in Treasury bill supply. Please comment on how Treasury 

might change coupon or TIPS issuance. Are there any other changes to the nominal coupon or TIPS programs that 

Treasury should consider? 

3. Please discuss the liquidity conditions for off-the-run Treasury securities. What is your expectation for off-the-run 

Treasury security liquidity in the future? What steps should the Treasury consider if you believe that liquidity in off-therun securities has diminished?
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O   Document 275   Filed 12/28/23    Page 1 of 2   PageID 5363

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O   Document 275   Filed 12/28/23    Page 2 of 2   PageID 5364
# Official Journal L 12/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 12 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6415 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 12

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6415 January 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/28 of 14 January 2021 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1362/2000 as regards the Union tariff quota for bananas originating in Mexico | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/28 of 14 January 2021 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1362/2000 as regards the Union tariff quota for bananas originating in Mexico

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1939 of 7 November 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 as regards Auxiliary Emission Strategies (AES), access to vehicle OBD information and vehicle repair and maintenance information, measurement of emissions during cold engine start periods and use of portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) to measure particle numbers, with respect to heavy duty vehicles ( OJ L 303, 25.11.2019 ) | 3 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1939 of 7 November 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 as regards Auxiliary Emission Strategies (AES), access to vehicle OBD information and vehicle repair and maintenance information, measurement of emissions during cold engine start periods and use of portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) to measure particle numbers, with respect to heavy duty vehicles ( OJ L 303, 25.11.2019 )

( OJ L 303, 25.11.2019 )

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. ___________ No. 96-2259

___________ Darrell F. Alessi, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Northwest Airlines, Inc., a * foreign corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 10, 1996 Filed: December 13, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

In separate actions, Darrell F. Alessi sued Northwest Airlines, Inc. ("Northwest"), Delta Air Lines ("Delta"), and United Airlines ("United"), alleging his applications for a pilot position were denied in violation of the Employee Protection Program of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, 49 U.S.C.A. § 42103(a). The critical issue common to all of Alessi's actions was whether he was a "protected employee" entitled to be the first employed by a covered air carrier. In the parallel case against Delta, the court held that Alessi was not a "protected employee." Ackerman v. Delta Airlines, Inc. , 920 F. Supp. 1269, 1276-78 (N.D. Ga. 1995). After concluding Alessi's claim was barred by this decision, the district court 1 granted Northwest's motion for summary judgment on collateral estoppel grounds. Alessi appeals, and we now affirm.-2- We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, applying the same standard as the district court. Demming v. Housing and Redevelopment Auth. , 66 F.3d 950, 953 (8th Cir. 1995). Because the Delta decision determining Alessi was not a "protected employee" bars relitigation of this issue, we agree with the district court that Northwest is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Tyus v. Schoemehl , 93 F.3d 449, 453 (8th Cir. 1996) (discussing collateral estoppel requirements); Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co. v. General Dynamics Corp. , 968 F.2d 707, 711 (8th Cir. 1992) (same); Perkins v. Spivey , 911 F.2d 22, 35 (8th Cir. 1990) (recognizing defensive use of collateral estoppel), cert. denied , 499 U.S. 920 (1991). We note that while this case was pending, another court also relied on the Deltadecision to collaterally estop Alessi from relitigating this claim. See Ackerman v. United Airlines, Inc. , No. 96-2455 (TFH) (D. D.C. Sept. 13, 1996).

We also reject Alessi's other arguments on appeal as without merit, and deny his objection to Northwest's submission of a supplemental appellate brief. Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 276 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 276

  Designating May 1, 1994, through May 7, 1994, as ``National Walking 
                                Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1993

    Mr. McHale introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating May 1, 1994, through May 7, 1994, as ``National Walking 
                                Week''.

Whereas medical authorities have established that walking--
            (1) powerfully protects against high blood pressure, 
        cholesterol problems, and other factors that can contribute to 
        heart disease;
            (2) protects against adult onset (Type II) diabetes;
            (3) builds strong bones and protects against osteoporosis, 
        the weak-bone disease that afflicts millions of older women;
            (4) probably offers protection against several forms of 
        cancer that are believed to be preventable through regular and 
        moderate exercise; and
            (5) is a safe and dependable way for millions of overweight 
        people to lose weight without stringent dieting;
Whereas the failure to exercise regularly, such as walking, has been identified 
        as the single greatest risk factor for heart disease;
Whereas the designation of ``National Walking Week'' will help promote the issue 
        of pedestrian access and safety;
Whereas areas of America are becoming inaccessible or unsafe for walkers, so the 
        benefits of this activity are being blocked;
Whereas people should be able to walk anywhere in their community, within 
        reason; and
Whereas walking encourages community spirit and safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 1, 1994, through May 
7, 1994, is designated as ``National Walking Week''. The President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe the week with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregory R. L. Smith, certify that:



1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Image Sensing Systems, Inc.;



2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  August 12, 2008



/s/ Gregory R. L. SmithName: Gregory R. L. SmithTitle: Chief Financial Officer






---
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 SONYA CASTILLO, Personal 2 Representative over the Estate of 3 ALFREDO CASTILLO, Individually, 4 and as next of friend of the minor 5 children, BRIAN LOPEZ, 6 CHRISTIAN CASTILLO, and 7 JULISSA CASTILLO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9

v. No. 34,643 10 NOR-LEA GENERAL HOSPITAL; 11 and NOR-LEA GENERAL HOSPITAL 12 CLINIC, and JUAN SOTO LOPEZ, MD., 13 Defendants-Appellees. 14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 15 William G. Shoobridge, District Judge 16 Max Houston Proctor 17 Hobbs, NM 18 for Appellant 19 Miller Stratvert P.A. 20 Thomas R. Mack 21 Albuquerque, NM 222 for Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 KENNEDY, Judge. 3 {1} Plaintiff Sonya Castillo appeals from the di strict court’s judgment of dismissal 4 with prejudice, [2 RP 244] and subseque nt order denying her motion for relief from 5 judgment. [2 RP 414] Summary dismissal inpart and affirmance in part was proposed 6 for the reasons stated in notice of proposed disposition. Our records indicate that 7 counsel for Plaintiff was served with the notice. No memorandum opposing our 8 proposed summary disposition has been file d, and the time for doing so has expired. 9 SeeRule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, wedismiss Plaintiff’s appeal from the 10 judgment of dismissal with prejudice for untimely filing of her notice of appeal, and 11 affirm the district court’s denial of her motion for relief from judgment. 12 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 13

_______________________________ 14 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16

___________________________________ 17 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 183 ___________________________________ 1 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 2
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 4, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
May 8, 2009
 By:
                /s/
      Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
      C. ShieldsExecutive
      Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
 
 This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
by reference.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kim Taylor, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Huntington Auto Trust 2015-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);





2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.








By:     /s/ Kim Taylor


Name:     Kim Taylor


Title:       Senior Vice President, The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer





Date: March 29, 2016
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

d0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144236

KEVIN AGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144236 COA: 300094 Court of Claims: 10-000035-MD DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 10, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH 

### and H ATHAWAY 

### , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.