UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION 

In Re: Highland Capital Management, L.P. § Case No. 19-34054-SGJ-11 

The Charitable DAF Fund LP § 

 Appellant § 22-03052 

vs. § 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. § 

 Appellee § 3:22-CV-02280-S

[43] Order granting amended motion to dismiss adversary proceeding with prejudice (related 

document # 19) Entered on 9/30/2022 

APPELLANT RECORD 

VOLUME 2 

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 1 of 235 PageID 94
Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 2 of 235 PageID 95
Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 3 of 235 PageID 96
Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 4 of 235 PageID 97
Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 5 of 235 PageID 98
Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 6 of 235 PageID 99
Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 7 of 235 PageID 100
Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 8 of 235 PageID 101
ORDER – PAGE 1 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 DALLAS DIVISION 

CHARITABLE DAF FUND, L.P., § 

 § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § Civil Action No. 3:21-CV-1710-N 

 § 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL § 

MANAGEMENT, L.P., § 

 § 

 Defendant. § 

 ORDER 

 This Order addresses Defendant Highland Capital Management, L.P.’s (“HCM”) 

motion for reconsideration of this Court’s earlier order staying this case [8]. This case 

challenges a transaction consumated in the course of a consolidated bankruptcy proceeding 

and names as the sole defendant the debtor in that bankruptcy. The Court therefore 

concludes that this case constitutes a matter “related to” a case in the bankruptcy court 

under the meaning of this District’s Miscellaneous Order No. 33. Accordingly, the Court 

grants Defendant’s motion, lifts the stay, and refers this case to Judge Stacey G.C. Jernigan 

of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, to be adjudicated 

as a matter related to the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy of HCM., Chapter 11 Case No. 19-34054. 

The Clerk of this Court and the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court to which this case is referred 

are directed to take such actions as are necessary to docket this matter as an Adversary 

Proceeding associated with the aforementioned consolidated bankruptcy case. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 18 Filed 05/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1345

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2

000040

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 9 of 235 PageID 102
ORDER – PAGE 2 

 Signed May 19, 2022. 

 ___________________________ 

 David C. Godbey 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 18 Filed 05/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1346

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2

000041

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 10 of 235 PageID 103
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

THE CHARITABLE DAF FUND, LP., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Cause No. ________________________

§

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, 

L.P.,

§

§

§

Defendant. §

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

This matter concerns self-dealing and seeks redress for violation of state and federal law,

including, but not limited to, violations of the Advisers Act of 1940, and other state causes of action.

I.

PARTIES 

1. Plaintiff The Charitable DAF Fund, L.P. (“Plaintiff” or “DAF”) is a limited 

partnership formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands.

2. Defendant Highland Capital Management L.P. (“Highland” or “HCMLP”) is a 

Delaware limited partnership, whose principal place of business is in Dallas, Texas, at 300 

Crescent Court, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75201.

II.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. Subject matter jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and under 

28 U.S.C. § 1334 because the suit arises out of post-petition acts or omissions of the debtor and 

certain of its principals.

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 1 of 11

000042

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 11 of 235 PageID 104
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 2

4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. because it has continuously done business in this state, and the causes of action 

arise from the acts or omissions committed in this state.

5. Venue is proper in this Court because a substantial number of the acts or omissions 

giving rise to this lawsuit and the causes of action asserted herein occurred in Dallas County.

III.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

6. HCMLP is a registered investment advisor (“RIA”) subject to the regulations of the 

Securities Exchange Commission.

7. HCMLP is both the advisor of and investor in Highland Multi Strategy Credit Fund, 

L.P. (“Multistrat”), a Delaware limited partnership. Highland Multi Strategy Credit Fund GP, L.P., 

itself a Delaware limited partnership, is the general partner of Multistrat, and HCMLP is the sole 

member of the general partner of Highland Multi Strategy Credit Fund GP, L.P.

8. HCMLP’s advisory capacity is governed, or at all relevant times was governed, by 

the Third Amended and Restated Investment Management Agreement, effective November 1, 

2013 (the “IMA”).

9. The purpose of Multistrat as a vehicle was stated as such: “The Fund's investment 

objective is to seek attractive risk-adjusted returns, consistent with the preservation of capital and 

prudent investment management.”

10. The Confidential Private Placement Memorandum for Multistrat disclosed that

“[t]he Investment Manager is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘Advisers Act’). 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 2 of 11

000043

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 12 of 235 PageID 105
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 3

Each prospective investor will be required to make a representation to indicate that it is a ‘qualified 

client’ as defined in the Advisers Act.”

11. Because of these agreements and roles as the General Partner and RIA, Highland 

owed contractual and fiduciary duties to Plaintiff as an investor in Multistrat.

12. James Seery, the principal, CEO, and CRO of HCMLP. in its capacity as a debtor, 

admitted under oath that HCMLP owes fiduciary duties to the investors of the funds HCMLP 

manages—which would include Multistrat—and therefore, has admitted under oath that HCMLP 

and its governed persons owe fiduciary duties to the investors in Multistrat, which include Plaintiff, 

The Charitable DAF Fund, and Highland Capital Management Services, Inc., among others.

13. As an investment vehicle advised at all times and controlled at all times by HCMLP, 

Multistrat purchased and owned a pool of viaticals—investments in life insurance policies keyed 

to the lives of other persons. When a person passes away, the life insurance money is paid to the 

owner of the policy—in this case, Multistrat.

14. The notional value of the viatical pool was approximately $145 million.

15. In or around August 2020, HCMLP sold the entire viatical pool for approximately

$35,000,000—less than one quarter of the insured value.

16. The policies insured people aged 90 on average, suggesting that the policies were 

highly likely to pay off in the ensuing few years given the age and life expectancies of the insureds,

as well as considering the actuarial impact of the COVID pandemic.

17. In the spring of 2020, Multistrat raised funds specifically for the purpose of paying 

the premiums on the viatical pool—amounts raised, borrowing availability, and liquid securities 

provided enough cash to pay the premiums. But HCMLP did not pursue this path as promised. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 3 of 11

000044

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 13 of 235 PageID 106
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 4

Instead, it sold the assets. To this day, it is unclear why the policies were sold, and why, just prior 

to a planned mediation.

18. Furthermore, the process of selling was severely flawed. For example, the health 

assessments used to determine the likelihood and timeline for the payout were two years old. 

HCMLP did not cause new, up-to-date health assessments to be performed, and instead was 

content to rely on stale information or worse, no information at all.

19. Furthermore, HCMLP made no effort to adjust the projected life expectancies due 

to the increasing age of the insureds during a process that stretched over seven months, nor for the 

potential impact of COVID on people over the age of 90, which would have impacted the price..

20. Equally troubling is that Multistrat obtained the funds to pay the premiums from 

another investor—yet, it apparently did not use the funds for that purpose.

21. HCMLP apparently used the proceeds of the sale to pay itself, notwithstanding the 

fact that there were redeemed interests waiting to be paid—interests to whom HCMLP also owed 

fiduciary duties.

22. In short, HCMLP caused Multistrat to sell the viatical pool at a substantially 

discounted amount to curry favor with the brokers and buyers in the marketplace for no apparent 

benefit to Multistrat’s investors or the debtor’s estate.

III.

CAUSES OF ACTION

First Cause of Action

Breach of the Advisers Act

23. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein.

24. Highland’s actions violate the Advisers Act.

25. As an RIA, HCMLP is subject to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 4 of 11

000045

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 14 of 235 PageID 107
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 5

26. The IMA imposes and incorporates the duties and obligations of the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940.

27. Under this federal law, an investment adviser is a fiduciary.1 This includes a duty 

of care, a duty of loyalty, and a duty to refrain from engaging in transactions in which it is not a 

disinterested person.

28. The duty of loyalty imposed by the Advisers Act of 1940 is not specifically defined 

in the Advisers Act or in Commission rules but reflects a Congressional recognition “of the delicate 

fiduciary nature of an investment advisory relationship” as well as a Congressional intent to 

“eliminate, or at least to expose, all conflicts of interest which might incline an investment 

adviser—consciously or unconsciously—to render advice which was not disinterested.”

29. To meet its duty of loyalty, an adviser must make full and fair disclosure to its 

clients of all material facts relating to the advisory relationship, including disclosing transactions 

in which the advisor has an interest, and to disclose all pertinent facts of a transaction that could 

affect the client or the client’s interest.2 In order for disclosure to be full and fair, it should be 

sufficiently specific so that a client is able to understand the material fact or conflict of interest and 

make an informed decision whether to provide consent.

1 SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc., 375 U.S. 180, 194 (1963). Santa Fe Indus. v. Green, 430 

U.S. 462, 471, n.11 (1977) (in discussing SEC v. Capital Gains, stating that the Supreme Court’s “references

to fraud in the “equitable” sense of the term was “premised on its recognition that Congress intended the 

Investment Advisers Act to establish federal fiduciary standards for investment advisers”); Investment 

Advisers Act Release No. 3060 (July 28, 2010) (“Under the Advisers Act, an adviser is a fiduciary whose 

duty is to serve the best interests of its clients, which includes an obligation not to subrogate clients’ interests 

to its own,” citing Proxy Voting by Investment Advisers, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 2106 (Jan. 

31, 2003) (“Investment Advisers Act Release 2106”)).

2 SEC v. Capital Gains, supra, at 200 (“Failure to disclose material facts must be deemed fraud or deceit 

within its intended meaning.”). Investment Advisers Act Release 3060, supra, footnote 15 (“as a fiduciary, 

an adviser has an ongoing obligation to inform its clients of any material information that could affect the

advisory relationship”); see also General Instruction 3 to Part 2 of Form ADV (“Under federal and state 

law, you are a fiduciary and must make full disclosure to your clients of all material facts relating to the 

advisory relationship.”).

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 5 of 11

000046

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 15 of 235 PageID 108
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 6

30. This fiduciary duty also requires an adviser “to adopt the principal’s goals, 

objectives, or ends.” This means the adviser must, at all times, serve the best interest of its client 

and not subordinate its client’s interest to its own. In other words, the investment adviser cannot 

place its own interests ahead of the interests of its client and must at all times act for the interests 

of its investors.3

31. Here, the goals of Multistrat included “to seek attractive risk adjusted returns, 

consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management.”

32. The duty of care includes, among other things: (i) the duty to provide advice that is 

in the best interest of the client, (ii) the duty to seek best execution of a client’s transactions where 

the adviser has the responsibility to select broker-dealers to execute client trades, and (iii) the duty 

to provide advice and monitoring over the course of the relationship.

33. These fiduciary duties are unwaivable, and any agreement made in derogation of 

the obligations under the Advisers Act is void.

34. Therefore, Plaintiff seeks to declare the sale of the viaticals void because they were 

accomplished in violation of the Advisers Act. 

35. Plaintiff further seeks to declare the agreement(s) between Highland and Multistrat 

void because they were continued in violation of the Advisers Act.

Second Cause of Action

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

36. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein.

3 Investment Advisers Act Release 3060 (adopting amendments to Form ADV and stating that “[u]nder the 

Advisers Act, an adviser is a fiduciary whose duty is to serve the best interests of its clients, which includes 

an obligation not to subrogate clients’ interests to its own,” citing Investment Advisers Act Release 2106, 

supra footnote 15). SEC v. Tambone, 550 F.3d 106, 146 (1st Cir. 2008) (“Section 206 imposes a fiduciary 

duty on investment advisers to act at all times in the best interest of the fund...”); Sec. & Exch. Commission 

v. Moran, 944 F. Supp. 286, 297 (S.D.N.Y 1996) (“Investment advisers are entrusted with the responsibility 

and duty to act in the best interest of their clients.”).

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 6 of 11

000047

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 16 of 235 PageID 109
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 7

37. As an RIA, HCMLP is subject to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. 

38. The IMA imposes and incorporates the duties and obligations of the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940.

39. Under this federal law, an investment adviser is a fiduciary.4 This includes a duty 

of care, a duty of loyalty, and a duty to refrain from engaging in transactions in which it is not a 

disinterested person.

40. The duty of loyalty imposed by the Advisers Act of 1940 is not specifically defined 

in the Advisers Act or in Commission rules, but reflects a Congressional recognition “of the 

delicate fiduciary nature of an investment advisory relationship” as well as a Congressional intent 

to “eliminate, or at least to expose, all conflicts of interest which might incline an investment 

adviser—consciously or unconsciously—to render advice which was not disinterested.”

41. To meet its duty of loyalty, an adviser must make full and fair disclosure to its 

clients of all material facts relating to the advisory relationship, including disclosing transactions 

in which the advisor has an interest, and to disclose all pertinent facts of a transaction that could 

affect the client or the client’s interest.5 In order for disclosure to be full and fair, it should be 

4 SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc., 375 U.S. 180, 194 (1963). Santa Fe Indus. v. Green, 430 

U.S. 462, 471, n.11 (1977) (in discussing SEC v. Capital Gains, stating that the Supreme Court’s reference 

to fraud in the “equitable” sense of the term was “premised on its recognition that Congress intended the 

Investment Advisers Act to establish federal fiduciary standards for investment advisers”); Investment 

Advisers Act Release No. 3060 (July 28, 2010) (“Under the Advisers Act, an adviser is a fiduciary whose 

duty is to serve the best interests of its clients, which includes an obligation not to subrogate clients’ interests 

to its own,” citing Proxy Voting by Investment Advisers, Investment Advisers Act Release No. IA2106 (Jan. 

31, 2003) (“Investment Advisers Act Release 2106”)).

5 SEC v. Capital Gains, supra, at 200 (“Failure to disclose material facts must be deemed fraud or deceit 

within its intended meaning.”). Investment Advisers Act Release 3060, supra, footnote 15 (“as a fiduciary, 

an adviser has an ongoing obligation to inform its clients of any material information that could affect the 

advisory relationship”); see also General Instruction 3 to Part 2 of Form ADV (“Under federal and state 

law, you are a fiduciary and must make full disclosure to your clients of all material facts relating to the 

advisory relationship.”).

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 7 of 11

000048

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 17 of 235 PageID 110
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 8

sufficiently specific so that a client is able to understand the material fact or conflict of interest and 

make an informed decision whether to provide consent.

42. This fiduciary duty also requires an adviser “to adopt the principal’s goals, 

objectives, or ends.” This means the adviser must, at all times, serve the best interest of its client 

and not subordinate its client’s interest to its own. In other words, the investment adviser cannot 

place its own interests ahead of the interests of its client and must at all times act for the interests 

of its investors.6

43. Here, the goals of Multistrat included “to seek attractive risk adjusted returns, 

consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management.”

44. The duty of care includes, among other things: (i) the duty to provide advice that is 

in the best interest of the client, (ii) the duty to seek best execution of a client’s transactions where 

the adviser has the responsibility to select broker-dealers to execute client trades, and (iii) the duty 

to provide advice and monitoring over the course of the relationship.

45. These fiduciary duties are unwaivable, and any agreement made in derogation of 

the obligations under the Advisers Act is void.

46. HCMLP’s CEO testified under oath that he and HCMLP were aware of these duties 

and had to comply with them.

47. Section 204 of the Advisers Act requires HCMLP to carry written policies and 

procedures that must be followed in order to adhere to its federal obligations.

6 Investment Advisers Act Release 3060 (adopting amendments to Form ADV and stating that “[u]nder the 

Advisers Act, an adviser is a fiduciary whose duty is to serve the best interests of its clients, which includes 

an obligation not to subrogate clients’ interests to its own,” citing Investment Advisers Act Release 2106, 

supra footnote 15). SEC v. Tambone, 550 F.3d 106, 146 (1st Cir. 2008) (“Section 206 imposes a fiduciary 

duty on investment advisers to act at all times in the best interest of the fund...”); SEC v. Moran, 944 F. 

Supp. 286, 297 (S.D.N.Y 1996) (“Investment advisers are entrusted with the responsibility and duty to act 

in the best interest of their clients.”).

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 8 of 11

000049

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 18 of 235 PageID 111
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 9

48. Section 206 of the Advisers Act prohibits transactions by an adviser that were 

accomplished via a “deceit” on a client or prospective client, e.g., by concealing the role and 

interest the adviser has in the transaction, or via engaging in a course of conduct that has a tendency 

to mislead a client or which is manipulative.

49. These breaches include, but are not limited to (1) selling the viatical pool at a 

distressed price when it was not in distress and there was no need for Multistrat to sell; (2) 

concealing the information about the transaction from the Plaintiff; (3) failing to advise the 

Plaintiff of the opportunity to purchase the viatical pool—especially when it knew the Plaintiff 

had an interest in the pool and had the means of purchasing it for more cash than $35 million; (4) 

concealing the purpose behind the sale of the viatical pool and the conflicts of interest that inhere 

in the transaction; (5) causing the viatical pool to be sold in a manner that violated the rights of 

the Plaintiff as an investor in Multistrat (e.g., by failing to conduct an auction, obtaining

competitive bids and taking the pool to market); and (6) utilizing the sale proceeds for its own 

ends—namely, to enrich itself.

50. The Advisers Act declares any contract that was made in violation of its provisions 

or regulations, or any contract that has been performed in violation of the Advisors Act, void.

51. The Advisers Act created a private right of action to void unlawful agreements and 

acts and to seek such equitable relief as accompanies such claims.

52. Texas law allows a fiduciary plaintiff to seek damages for breaches of fiduciary 

duty and to seek disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains obtained by a fiduciary.

53. Plaintiff has been damaged due to the breaches of fiduciary duty outlined herein, 

and it is entitled to recover damages, punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees.

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 9 of 11

000050

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 19 of 235 PageID 112
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 10

54. To the extent this claim must be brought as a derivative action, it is plain that the 

demand requirement under Delaware law could not be met because serving a demand on Highland

or to sue Highland would have been futile.

Third Cause of Action

Breach of Contract

55. Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein.

56. The IMA imposes a duty of prudent investment management for the benefit of the 

investors in Multistrat and incorporate the duties and obligations of the Investment Advisers Act 

of 1940.

57. The violations set forth above constitute a breach of each or both of these 

agreements.

58. These breaches include, but are not limited to (1) selling the viatical pool at a 

distressed price when it was not in distress and there was no need for Multistrat to sell; (2) 

concealing the information about the transaction from the Plaintiff; (3) failing to advise the 

Plaintiff of the opportunity to purchase the viatical pool—especially when it knew the Plaintiff 

had an interest in the pool and had the means of purchasing it for more cash than $35 million; (4) 

concealing the purpose behind the sale of the viatical pool and the conflicts of interest that inhere 

in the transaction; (5) causing the viatical pool to be sold in a manner that violated the rights of 

the Plaintiff as an investor in Multistrat (e.g., by failing to conduct an auction, obtaining

competitive bids, and taking the pool to market); and (6) utilizing the sale proceeds for its own 

ends—namely, to enrich itself.

59. Plaintiff has been damaged by the breaches of contract outlined herein.

60. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages and attorneys’ fees.

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 10 of 11

000051

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 20 of 235 PageID 113
______________________________________________________________________________

Original Complaint Page 11

JURY DEMAND AND PRAYER

61. Plaintiff demands trial by jury.

62. Plaintiff respectfully requests judgment and an order:

x Disgorging all ill-gotten gains in an amount to be determined at trial;

x Voiding the sale and other relevant agreements herein with HCMLP pursuant to the 

Advisers Act;

x Awarding damages in an amount to be determined at trial;

x Awarding punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial;

x Awarding attorneys’ fees and costs in an amount to be determined at trial;

x Awarding all interim and final relief to which Plaintiff is legally or equitably

entitled under the facts and circumstances raised herein.

Dated: July 22, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

SBAITI & COMPANY PLLC

/s/ Mazin A. Sbaiti

Mazin A. Sbaiti

Texas Bar No. 24058096

Jonathan Bridges

Texas Bar No. 24028835

JPMorgan Chase Tower

2200 Ross Avenue – Suite 4900W

Dallas, TX 75201

T: (214) 432-2899

F: (214) 853-4367

E: mas@sbaitilaw.com

jeb@sbaitilaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Original Complaint Page 11 of 11

000052

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 21 of 235 PageID 114
JS 44 (Rev. 10/20) - TXND (10/20) CIVIL COVER SHEET

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as 

provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the 

purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant

(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF 

THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff 

(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant) 

1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF

Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4

of Business In This State

2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5

Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State

Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6 6

Foreign Country

IV. NATURE OF SUIT(Place an “X” in One Box Only) Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions.

CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES

110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act

120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 376 Qui Tam (31 USC 

130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability 690 Other 28 USC 157 3729(a))

140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 400 State Reapportionment

150 Recovery of Overpayment 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 410 Antitrust

& Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights 430 Banks and Banking

151 Medicare Act 330 Federal Employers’ Product Liability 830 Patent 450 Commerce

152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 835 Patent - Abbreviated 460 Deportation

Student Loans 340 Marine Injury Product New Drug Application 470 Racketeer Influenced and

(Excludes Veterans) 345 Marine Product Liability 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations

153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY LABOR 880 Defend Trade Secrets 480 Consumer Credit

of Veteran’s Benefits 350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud 710 Fair Labor Standards Act of 2016 (15 USC 1681 or 1692)

160 Stockholders’ Suits 355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending Act 485 Telephone Consumer

190 Other Contract Product Liability 380 Other Personal 720 Labor/Management SOCIAL SECURITY Protection Act

195 Contract Product Liability 360 Other Personal Property Damage Relations 861 HIA (1395ff) 490 Cable/Sat TV

196 Franchise Injury 385 Property Damage 740 Railway Labor Act 862 Black Lung (923) 850 Securities/Commodities/

362 Personal Injury - Product Liability 751 Family and Medical 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) Exchange

Medical Malpractice Leave Act 864 SSID Title XVI 890 Other Statutory Actions

REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 790 Other Labor Litigation 865 RSI (405(g)) 891 Agricultural Acts

210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: 791 Employee Retirement 893 Environmental Matters

220 Foreclosure 441 Voting 463 Alien Detainee Income Security Act FEDERAL TAX SUITS 895 Freedom of Information

230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment 510 Motions to Vacate 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff Act

240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/ Sentence or Defendant) 896 Arbitration

245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 530 General 871 IRS—Third Party 899 Administrative Procedure

290 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION Act/Review or Appeal of

Employment Other: 462 Naturalization Application Agency Decision

446 Amer. w/Disabilities - 540 Mandamus & Other 465 Other Immigration 950 Constitutionality of

Other 550 Civil Rights Actions State Statutes

448 Education 555 Prison Condition

560 Civil Detainee -

Conditions of 

Confinement

V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)

1 Original

Proceeding 

2 Removed from

State Court

3 Remanded from

Appellate Court 

4 Reinstated or

Reopened

5 Transferred from

Another District

(specify)

6 Multidistrict

Litigation - 

Transfer

8 Multidistrict

Litigation -

Direct File

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):

Brief description of cause:

VII. REQUESTED IN

COMPLAINT:

CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION

UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. 

DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:

JURY DEMAND: Yes No

VIII. RELATED CASE(S)

IF ANY (See instructions):

JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER

DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

26 USC 7609

The Charitable DAF Fund, L.P.

Cayman Islands Dallas County, TX

Sbaiti & Company PLLC, 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4900W, 

Dallas, TX 75201

Highland Capital Management, L.P.

✖

✖

15 U.S.C. § 80b-1

Adviser's Act violation

Stacey G. Jernigan 19-34054-sgj11 NDTX-BK

✖

✖

July 22, 2021 /s/ Mazin A. Sbaiti

Y

Y

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 1-1 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 12

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-2 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Civil Cover Sheet Page 1 of 1

000053

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 22 of 235 PageID 115
5/25/22, 4:25 PM District Version 6.3.3

https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211755361390258-L_1_0-1 1/4

JURY

U.S. District Court

Northern District of Texas (Dallas)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:21-cv-01710-N

Charitable DAF Fund LP v. Highland Capital Management LP

Assigned to: Judge David C Godbey

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Date Filed: 07/22/2021

Jury Demand: Plaintiff

Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutes: Other

Statutory Actions

Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff

Charitable DAF Fund LP represented by Mazin A Sbaiti 

Sbaiti & Company PLLC 

J.P. Morgan Chase Tower 

2200 Ross Avenue 

Suite 4900W 

Dallas, TX 75201 

214-432-2899 

Fax: 214-853-4367 

Email: MAS@SbaitiLaw.com 

LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Bar Status: Admitted/In Good Standing

Jonathan Bridges 

Sbaiti & Company PLLC 

2200 Ross Ave 

Suite 4900W 

Dallas, TX 75201 

214-432-2899 

Fax: 214/754-1933 FAX 

Email: jeb@sbaitilaw.com 

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Bar Status: Admitted/In Good Standing

V.

Defendant

Highland Capital Management LP represented by Zachery Z. Annable 

Hayward PLLC 

10501 N. Central Expressway 

Suite 106 

Dallas, TX 75231 

972-755-7108 

Fax: 972-755-7110 

Email: zannable@haywardfirm.com 

LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Bar Status: Admitted/In Good Standing

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Docket Sheet from 21-CV-1710 Page 1 of 4

000054

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 23 of 235 PageID 116
5/25/22, 4:25 PM District Version 6.3.3

https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211755361390258-L_1_0-1 2/4

Gregory V Demo 

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 

780 Third Ave 

34th Floor 

New York, NY 10017 

212-561-7700 

Fax: 212-561-7777 

Email: gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Bar Status: Not Admitted

Hayley R Winograd 

Pachulski Stand Ziehl & Jones LLP 

780 Third Avenue 

34th Floor 

New York, NY 10017 

212-561-7700 

Fax: 212-561-7777 

Bar Status: Not Admitted

Jeffrey N Pomerantz 

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd 

13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

310-227-6910 

Fax: 310-201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Bar Status: Not Admitted

John A Morris 

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 

780 Third Avenue, 34th Floor 

New York, NY 10017-2024 

212-561-7700 

Fax: 212-561-7777 

Email: jmorris@pszjlaw.com 

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Bar Status: Not Admitted

Melissa S Hayward 

Hayward PLLC 

10501 N Central Expwy 

Suite 106 

Dallas, TX 75231 

972-755-7100 

Fax: 972-755-7104 

Email: mhayward@haywardfirm.com 

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Bar Status: Admitted/In Good Standing

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Docket Sheet from 21-CV-1710 Page 2 of 4

000055

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 24 of 235 PageID 117
5/25/22, 4:25 PM District Version 6.3.3

https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211755361390258-L_1_0-1 3/4

Date Filed # Docket Text

07/22/2021 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Highland Capital Management LP filed by

Charitable DAF Fund LP. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12078150) Plaintiff will

submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge

assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements and Judge Specific

Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and

future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three

business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the

Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and

exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here:

Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within

21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)

(Sbaiti, Mazin) (Entered: 07/22/2021)

07/22/2021 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons to Highland Capital Management, L.P. filed by

Charitable DAF Fund LP. (Sbaiti, Mazin) (Entered: 07/22/2021)

07/22/2021 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is

provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge

(Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)

(Entered: 07/23/2021)

07/23/2021 4 Summons Issued as to Highland Capital Management LP. (ndt) (Entered: 07/23/2021)

07/23/2021 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by

Charitable DAF Fund LP. (Sbaiti, Mazin) (Entered: 07/23/2021)

08/26/2021 6 MOTION to Stay filed by Charitable DAF Fund LP (Sbaiti, Mazin) (Entered: 08/26/2021)

09/07/2021 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 6 Motion to Stay. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey

on 9/7/2021) (chmb) (Entered: 09/07/2021)

10/05/2021 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re 7 Order on Motion to Stay (Highland Capital

Management, L.P.'s Motion for Reconsideration of Stay Order) filed by Highland Capital

Management LP (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A)Attorney Zachery Z. Annable added to

party Highland Capital Management LP(pty:dft) (Annable, Zachery) (Entered:

10/05/2021)

10/05/2021 9 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Highland Capital Management LP re 8 MOTION

for Reconsideration re 7 Order on Motion to Stay (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s

Motion for Reconsideration of Stay Order) (Annable, Zachery) (Entered: 10/05/2021)

10/05/2021 10 Appendix in Support filed by Highland Capital Management LP re 8 MOTION for

Reconsideration re 7 Order on Motion to Stay (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s

Motion for Reconsideration of Stay Order) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1, # 2 Exhibit(s)

2, # 3 Exhibit(s) 3, # 4 Exhibit(s) 4, # 5 Exhibit(s) 5, # 6 Exhibit(s) 6, # 7 Exhibit(s) 7, # 8

Exhibit(s) 8, # 9 Exhibit(s) 9, # 10 Exhibit(s) 10, # 11 Exhibit(s) 11, # 12 Exhibit(s) 12, #

13 Exhibit(s) 13, # 14 Exhibit(s) 14, # 15 Exhibit(s) 15, # 16 Exhibit(s) 16, # 17 Exhibit(s)

17, # 18 Exhibit(s) 18, # 19 Exhibit(s) 19, # 20 Exhibit(s) 20, # 21 Exhibit(s) 21, # 22

Exhibit(s) 22, # 23 Exhibit(s) 23, # 24 Exhibit(s) 24, # 25 Exhibit(s) 25, # 26 Exhibit(s) 26,

# 27 Exhibit(s) 27) (Annable, Zachery) (Entered: 10/05/2021)

10/05/2021 11 MOTION to Dismiss (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss) filed by

Highland Capital Management LP (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A) (Annable, Zachery)

(Entered: 10/05/2021)

10/05/2021 12 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Highland Capital Management LP re 11 MOTION

to Dismiss (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss) (Annable, Zachery)

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Docket Sheet from 21-CV-1710 Page 3 of 4

000056

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 25 of 235 PageID 118
5/25/22, 4:25 PM District Version 6.3.3

https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211755361390258-L_1_0-1 4/4

(Entered: 10/05/2021)

10/05/2021 13 Appendix in Support filed by Highland Capital Management LP re 11 MOTION to

Dismiss (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss) (Attachments: # 1

Exhibit(s) 1, # 2 Exhibit(s) 2, # 3 Exhibit(s) 3) (Annable, Zachery) (Entered: 10/05/2021)

10/11/2021 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Highland Capital Management LP re: 8 MOTION for

Reconsideration, 9 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, 10 Appendix in Support, 11

MOTION to Dismiss (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss), 12

Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, 13 Appendix in Support. (Annable, Zachery)

Modified text on 10/12/2021 (mjr). (Entered: 10/11/2021)

10/27/2021 15 RESPONSE filed by Charitable DAF Fund LP re: 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re 7

Order on Motion to Stay (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s Motion for

Reconsideration of Stay Order) (Sbaiti, Mazin) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

11/05/2021 16 REPLY filed by Highland Capital Management LP re: 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re

7 Order on Motion to Stay (Highland Capital Management, L.P.'s Motion for

Reconsideration of Stay Order) (Annable, Zachery) (Entered: 11/05/2021)

11/12/2021 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Highland Capital Management LP re 16 Reply (Annable,

Zachery) (Entered: 11/12/2021)

05/19/2022 18 ORDER re: 8 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court grants Defendant's motion, lifts the

stay, and refers this case to Judge Stacey G.C. Jernigan of the United States Bankruptcy

Court for the Northern District of Texas, to be adjudicated as a matter related to the

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy of HCM., Chapter 11 Case No. 10-34054. The Clerk of this Court

and the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court to which this case is referred are directed to take

such actions as are necessary to docket this matter as an Adversary Proceeding associated

with the aforementioned consolidated bankruptcy case. (Ordered by Judge David C

Godbey on 5/19/2022) (oyh) (Main Document 18 replaced on 5/23/2022) (twd). (Entered:

05/20/2022)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

05/25/2022 16:21:04

PACER

Login: mmathews01:5861713:5854364 ClientCode:

Description: Docket Report Search

Criteria:

3:21-cv01710-N

Billable

Pages: 3 Cost: 0.30

Exempt

flag: Exempt Exemptreason: Always

PACER fee: Exempt

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 1-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:14:18 Desc 

Docket Sheet from 21-CV-1710 Page 4 of 4

000057

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 26 of 235 PageID 119
1 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No. 143717) 

Robert J. Feinstein (NY Bar No. 1767805) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 266326) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com 

 jmorris@pszjlaw.com 

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

 hwinograd@pszjlaw.com 

-andHAYWARD PLLC 

Melissa S. Hayward 

Texas Bar No. 24044908 

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com 

Zachery Z. Annable 

Texas Bar No. 24053075 

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Tel: (972) 755-7100 

Fax: (972) 755-7110 

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

THE CHARITABLE DAF FUND, L.P., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 3:21-cv-01710-N 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID 27

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 5

000058

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 27 of 235 PageID 120
2 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION OF STAY ORDER 

Highland Capital Management, L.P., a defendant in the above-captioned case (the “Debtor” 

or “Highland”), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this motion (the “Motion”) seeking 

reconsideration of the Stay Order (as defined below) that was recently entered by the Court without 

notice to, or opposition by, Highland. In support of its Motion, Highland states as follows: 

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the Motion pursuant to section 1334(a) and (b) of 

title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). 

2. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409. 

3. The predicates for the relief requested in the Motion are 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), Rule 

9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules), and Rule 59(a) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

RELIEF REQUESTED 

4. Through this Motion, Highland requests that this Court issue the proposed form of 

order attached as Exhibit A (the “Proposed Order”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a). 

5. For the reasons set forth more fully in Highland Capital Management, L.P.’s 

Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of Stay Order (the “Memorandum 

of Law”) filed contemporaneously with this Motion, Highland requests that the Court: (a) re-open 

the Stay Order, amend the findings and conclusions, and issue a new order denying the Stay 

Motion, and (b) grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. 

6. In accordance with Rule 7.1 of the Local Civil Rules of the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “Local Rules”), contemporaneously herewith and in 

support of the Motion Highland is filing: (a) its Memorandum of Law, and (b) the Appendix in 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID 28

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 5

000059

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 28 of 235 PageID 121
3 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

Support of Motion for Reconsideration of Stay Order (the “Appendix”), together with the exhibits 

annexed thereto. 

7. Based on the exhibits annexed to the Appendix and the arguments contained in the 

Memorandum of Law, Highland is entitled to the relief requested herein as set forth in the Proposed 

Order. 

8. Notice of this Motion has been provided to all parties. Highland submits that no 

other or further notice need be provided. 

WHEREFORE, Highland respectfully requests that the Court (i) enter the Proposed Order 

substantially in the formed annexed hereto as Exhibit A granting the relief requested herein, and 

(ii) grant Highland such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper. 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank] 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID 29

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 5

000060

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 29 of 235 PageID 122
4 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

Dated: October 5, 2021. PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No. 143717) 

Robert J. Feinstein (NY Bar No. 1767805) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 266326) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com 

 jmorris@pszjlaw.com 

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

 hwinograd@pszjlaw.com 

-andHAYWARD PLLC 

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable 

 Melissa S. Hayward 

Texas Bar No. 24044908 

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com 

Zachery Z. Annable 

Texas Bar No. 24053075 

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Tel: (972) 755-7100 

Fax: (972) 755-7110 

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8 Filed 10/05/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID 30

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 5

000061

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 30 of 235 PageID 123
5 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that, on October 5, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion 

was served electronically upon all parties registered to receive electronic notice in this case via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable

Zachery Z. Annable 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8 Filed 10/05/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID 31

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 5

000062

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 31 of 235 PageID 124
1 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

EXHIBIT A 

 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID 32

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc 

Exhibit A Page 1 of 3

000063

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 32 of 235 PageID 125
2 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

THE CHARITABLE DAF FUND, L.P., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 3:21-cv-01710-N 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION OF STAY ORDER 

Before the Court is Highland Capital Management L.P.’s Motion for Reconsideration of 

Stay Order [Docket No. __] (the “Motion”)1

 Having considered: (a) the Motion; (b) Highland 

Capital Management, L.P.’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of 

Order to Enforce the Order of Reference [Docket No. __] (the “Memorandum of Law”); and (c) 

the Appendix in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of Stay Order [Docket No. __] (the 

“Appendix”), and the exhibits annexed thereto; and this Court having jurisdiction over this matter 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334; and this Court having found that (a) venue of this 

proceeding and the Motion in this District is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409; (b) Highland 

was not served with the Stay Motion and had no opportunity to contest it; (c) the Court was 

presented with new facts and arguments in the Motion, the Memorandum of Law, and the 

Appendix of which it was unaware when it entered the Stay Order; (d) based on those new facts, 

1

 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the 

Memorandum of Law. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID 33

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc 

Exhibit A Page 2 of 3

000064

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 33 of 235 PageID 126
3 

DOCS_NY:44200.2 36027/003 

the Court finds and determines that Plaintiff has not met its burden of proving that a stay of the 

Action is warranted; and this Court having found that Highland’s notice of the Motion and 

opportunity for a hearing on the Motion were appropriate under the circumstances and that no 

other notice need be provided; and this Court having determined that the legal and factual bases 

set forth in the Motion establish good cause for the relief granted herein; and upon all of the 

proceedings had before this Court; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing 

therefor, and for the reasons set forth in the record on this Motion, it is HEREBY ORDERED 

THAT: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. Pursuant to Rule 59, the Court re-opens and vacates the Stay Order and enters this 

new Order DENYING the Stay Motion. 

It is so ordered this ________ day of __________________, 2021. 

 ____________________________________ 

 The Honorable David C. Godbey 

 United States District Judge

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 8-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID 34

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 8-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:43:18 Desc 

Exhibit A Page 3 of 3

000065

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 34 of 235 PageID 127
DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No. 143717) 

Robert J. Feinstein (NY Bar No. 1767805) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 266326) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com 

 jmorris@pszjlaw.com 

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

 hwinograd@pszjlaw.com 

HAYWARD PLLC 

Melissa S. Hayward (Texas Bar No. 24044908) 

Zachery Z. Annable (Texas Bar No. 24053075) 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Telephone: (972) 755-7100 

Facsimile: (972) 755-7110 

Email: MHayward@HaywardFirm.com 

 ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com 

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

THE CHARITABLE DAF FUND, L.P., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 3:21-cv-01710-N 

HIGHLAND’S CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF STAY ORDER

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 15 PageID 35

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 15

000066

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 35 of 235 PageID 128
i 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page 

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................................................................ 1 

II. RELEVANT BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 3 

A. Case Background ................................................................................................................ 3 

B. The Plan and Confirmation Order ....................................................................................... 3 

C. Appellants’ Appeals of the Confirmation Order ................................................................. 6 

D. Motions to Stay Pending Appeals of Confirmation Order are Filed and Denied ............... 6 

E. Plaintiff Commences the Action but Never Serves Highland, and the Plan Goes 

Effective .......................................................................................................................... 8 

F. Plaintiff Moves for a Stay of the Action ............................................................................. 8 

III. ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................... 9 

Plaintiff Failed to Demonstrate a Stay Was Warranted .............................................................. 9 

CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 11 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 15 PageID 36

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 15

000067

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 36 of 235 PageID 129
ii 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 

CASES

Belcher v. Birmingham Trust Nat’l Bank, 

395 F.2d 685 (5th Cir. 1968) ....................................................................................................... 9 

Earl v. Boeing Co., 

4:19-CV-507, 2021 WL 1080689 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2021) .................................................... 9 

In re First S. Sav. Assoc., 

820 F.2d 700 (5th Cir. 1987) ...................................................................................................... 9 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 15 PageID 37

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 15

000068

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 37 of 235 PageID 130
1 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

Highland Capital Management, L.P. (“Highland”), the reorganized debtor and the putative 

defendant in the above-captioned action (the “Action”), submits this Memorandum of Law in 

support of its motion for reconsideration of the Stay Order (as defined below) that was recently 

entered by the Court without notice to, or opposition by, Highland (the “Motion”). In support of 

its Motion, Highland states as follows: 

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT1

1. Highland is a reorganized debtor, having emerged from bankruptcy on August 11, 

2021, when its Plan went effective. 

2. The Charitable DAF Fund, L.P. (“Plaintiff”), a “trust” that exists for the benefit of 

James Dondero, Highland’s former owner who is waging a never-ending grudge match against 

Highland’s stakeholders, commenced this action on July 22, 2021, but never served its Complaint.2 

Instead, on August 26, 2021, without notice to Highland, it filed Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay All 

Proceedings [Docket No. 6] (the “Stay Motion”). On September 7, 2021, this Court entered an 

electronic order granting the unopposed Stay Motion [Docket No. 7] (the “Stay Order”). 

3. The Stay Motion was just another piece of Mr. Dondero’s coordinated litigation 

strategy against Highland, its stakeholders, and its judicially approved fiduciaries to waste 

resources, delay adjudication of pending disputes, and impede the wind-down of Highland’s estate 

pursuant to the terms of its confirmed Plan.3

1

 All capitalized terms used but not defined in this section have the meanings given to them below. 

2

 Plaintiff filed the Complaint ostensibly to recover damages it incurred from Highland’s mismanagement of the 

Highland Multi Strategy Credit Fund, L.P. (“MSCF”) during Highland’s bankruptcy. Plaintiff has no interest in 

MSCF. 

3

 Exhibit 1 (Appx. 1-15) to the Appendix lists the substantial litigation commenced or caused by Mr. Dondero and his 

controlled entities in furtherance of his strategy of harassment. As set forth in Exhibit 2 to the Appendix (Appx. 16-

19), the Stay Motion is one of nineteen motions for a continuance, stay, or abatement (exclusive of the motions 

to stay the Confirmation Order) filed by Mr. Dondero and his controlled entities since the entry of the 

Confirmation Order – each of which seeks to delay final resolution of several pending lawsuits and appeals, most 

of which (like this action) they commenced. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 4 of 15 PageID 38

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 15

000069

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 38 of 235 PageID 131
2 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) (“Rule 59”), the Court should reopen the Stay Order, amend its findings, and enter a new order denying the Stay Motion because 

the Stay Motion was never served (and Highland was therefore never given an opportunity to 

respond to the relief requested in the Stay Motion) and Plaintiff has mischaracterized the 

underlying facts. 

5. In context, Plaintiff failed to satisfy its heavy burden of showing the extraordinary 

remedy of a stay is warranted. Indeed, Plaintiff did not even address the four-pronged test routinely 

applied to a request for a stay pending appeal in the Fifth Circuit. For example, (i) Plaintiff cannot

succeed on the merits because it is not a party to the underlying appeal, (ii) there is no irreparable 

harm in the absence of a stay, and (iii) a stay would not serve the public interest. 

6. Plaintiff did not object to or appeal the Confirmation Order, yet Plaintiff’s Stay 

Motion is premised on the pending appeals to which it is not a party. Further, and significantly, 

the Bankruptcy Court, the United States District Court, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals 

previously denied the motions to stay the Confirmation Order that were filed by the actual 

Appellants (each of which is owned and/or controlled by Mr. Dondero).4

 There is no basis for 

Plaintiff to effectively obtain a stay of the Confirmation Order – particularly after the actual 

Appellants were unable to obtain a stay pending their own appeal of the Confirmation Order. 

Finally, Plaintiff’s reliance on certain Plan provisions, such as the Injunction Provision referenced 

above, is misplaced. While Highland maintains that this Action ultimately belongs in the 

Bankruptcy Court based on, among other reasons, the Injunction Provision, the extraordinary 

remedy of a stay pending appeal of the Confirmation Order has no application, or relevance, to the 

4

 The only parties appealing the Confirmation Order are the Appellants, which are Mr. Dondero and entities he owns 

and/or controls. Ex. 3, Appx. 40. (“[T]he Bankruptcy Court considers them all to be marching pursuant to the orders 

of Mr. Dondero”). 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 5 of 15 PageID 39

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 15

000070

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 39 of 235 PageID 132
3 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

effect of the Injunction Provision on the Action. Any stay of this Action premised on the Appeal 

of the Confirmation Order is simply not an appropriate remedy here. 

7. For the reasons set forth above and below, and pursuant to Rule 59, Highland 

respectfully requests that the Court re-open the Stay Order, amend its findings, and enter a new 

order denying the Stay Motion.5

II. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 

A. Case Background 

8. On October 16, 2019 (the “Petition Date”), Highland commenced a voluntary case 

under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Case”). 

B. The Plan and Confirmation Order 

9. On February 22, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, 

Dallas Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”) entered its Order (i) Confirming the Fifth Amended Plan 

of Reorganization (as Modified) and (ii) Granting Related Relief [Bankr. Dkt. No. 1943] (the 

“Confirmation Order”) which confirmed the Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland 

Capital Management, L.P (as Modified) (the “Plan”). Pursuant to the Plan, as of the Effective 

Date (as defined in the Plan), Enjoined Parties (as defined in the Plan) are prohibited from pursuing 

or continuing actions of any kind against Highland (the “Injunction Provision”). The Plan and the 

Confirmation Order each provide, in pertinent part: 

5

 Pursuant to the Confirmation Order and the Plan, as of the Effective Date, Plaintiff is enjoined from conducting or 

continuing any suit or proceeding of any kind against Highland. See Docket No. 1943 (Confirmation Order) at 76-78 

(Ex. 3, Appx. 96-98), and Ex. A (Plan) at 50-51 (Ex. 3, Appx. 167-168). For that reason, Highland is simultaneously 

filing a motion to dismiss this Action (the “Motion to Dismiss”). As set forth in the Plan, the Confirmation Order, 

and the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff will not be left without a remedy but has the right to seek to pursue the claims 

asserted in the Action as an administrative claim in the Bankruptcy Court. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 6 of 15 PageID 40

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 15

000071

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 40 of 235 PageID 133
4 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

Injunction 

Upon entry of the Confirmation Order, all Enjoined Parties are and shall be 

permanently enjoined, on and after the Effective Date, from taking any actions to 

interfere with the implementation or consummation of the Plan. Except as expressly 

provided in the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or a separate order of the Bankruptcy 

Court, all Enjoined Parties are and shall be permanently enjoined, on and after 

the Effective Date, with respect to any Claims and Equity Interests, from directly 

or indirectly (i) commencing, conducting, or continuing in any manner any suit, 

action, or other proceeding of any kind (including any proceeding in a judicial, 

arbitral, administrative or other forum) against or affecting the Debtor or the 

property of the Debtor, (ii) enforcing, levying, attaching (including any 

prejudgment attachment), collecting, or otherwise recovering, enforcing, or 

attempting to recover or enforce, by any manner or means, any judgment, award, 

decree, or order against the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (iii) creating, 

perfecting, or otherwise enforcing in any manner, any security interest, lien or 

encumbrance of any kind against the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (iv) 

asserting any right of setoff, directly or indirectly, against any obligation due to the 

Debtor or against property or interests in property of the Debtor, except to the 

limited extent permitted under Sections 553 and 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code, and 

(v) acting or proceeding in any manner, in any place whatsoever, that does not 

conform to or comply with the provisions of the Plan. 

Confirmation Order at 76-78 (Ex. 3, Appx. 96-98), and Ex. A (Plan) at 50-51 (Ex. 3, 167-168) 

(emphasis added).6

 No appellant has appealed or challenged the foregoing language in the 

Injunction Provision. Plaintiff is an “Enjoined Party”7

 under the Plan, and by their express terms, 

the Confirmation Order and Plan expressly enjoin Plaintiff from continuing the Action. 

6

 The Injunction Provision also included a permanent injunction which enjoined “all Enjoined Parties. . . from taking 

any actions to interfere with the implementation or consummation of the Plan” (the “Permanent Injunction”) and a 

“gatekeeper” provision that prohibited all “Enjoined Parties” from pursuing claims against certain “Protected Parties” 

unless the Bankruptcy Court first found those claims to be colorable (the “Gatekeeper Provision”). Ex. 3, Appx. 74. 

While the Gatekeeper Provision also prevents Plaintiff from proceeding with the Action in this Court, it is the language 

in the Injunction Provision set forth above –which is not involved in the Appeal – that independently prohibits pursuit 

of this Action. 

7

 “Enjoined Party” means, inter alia, “(i) all Entities who have held, hold, or may hold Claims against or Equity 

Interests in the Debtor (whether or not proof of such Claims or Equity Interests has been filed and whether or not such 

Entities vote in favor of, against or abstain from voting on the Plan or are presumed to have accepted or deemed to 

have rejected the Plan), (ii) James Dondero (“Dondero”), (iii) any Entity that has appeared and/or filed any motion, 

objection, or other pleading in this Chapter 11 Case regardless of the capacity in which such Entity appeared and any 

other party in interest, (iv) any Related Entity, and (v) the Related Persons of each of the foregoing.” Ex. 3, Appx. 

125. Plaintiff satisfies sections (i), (iii), (iv), and (v) of the definition of “Enjoined Party.” 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 7 of 15 PageID 41

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 15

000072

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 41 of 235 PageID 134
5 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

10. The Injunction Provision, however, does not leave putative claimants, like Plaintiff, 

without a course to pursue their claims. The Plan includes a mechanism allowing holders of claims 

arising after the Petition Date but prior to the Effective Date to assert claims. They may, at their 

election, file an application with the Bankruptcy Court seeking an allowed administrative claim. 

Article II of the Plan provides, in relevant part: 

Administrative Expensive Claims 

On the later of the Effective Date or the date on which an Administrative Expense 

Claim becomes an Allowed Administrative Expense Claim, or, in each such case, 

as soon as practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Administrative 

Expense Claim (other than Professional Fee Claims) will receive, in full 

satisfaction, settlement, discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such 

Allowed Administrative Expense Claim either (i) payment in full in Available Cash 

for the unpaid portion of such Allowed Administrative Expense Claim; or (ii) such 

other less favorable treatment as agreed to in writing by the Debtor or the 

Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, and such Holder; provided, however, that 

Administrative Expense Claims incurred by the Debtor in the ordinary course of 

business may be paid in the ordinary course of business in the discretion of the 

Debtor in accordance with such applicable terms and conditions relating thereto 

without further notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court. All statutory fees 

payable under 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a) shall be paid as such fees become due. 

If an Administrative Expense Claim (other than a Professional Fee Claim) is not 

paid by the Debtor in the ordinary course, the Holder of such Administrative 

Expense Claim must File, on or before the applicable Administrative Expense 

Claims Bar Date, and serve on the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, 

and such other Entities who are designated by the Bankruptcy Rules, the 

Confirmation Order or other order of the Bankruptcy Court, an application for 

allowance and payment of such Administrative Expense Claim. 

Plan at 16-17 (Ex. 4, Appx. 204-205). If Plaintiff wish to continue its Action, the Confirmation 

Order mandates that it do so by filing for an administrative claim.8

8

 Under the Plan, the Administrative Expense Claim Bar Date passed on September 25, 2021, so Plaintiff would, in 

fact, be required to request an order from the Bankruptcy Court permitting it to file a late claim. Highland reserves 

the right to contest any such request. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 8 of 15 PageID 42

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 15

000073

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 42 of 235 PageID 135
6 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

C. Appellants’ Appeals of the Confirmation Order 

11. Following entry of the Confirmation Order, in March 2021, James Dondero and 

certain of his related entities, including: (i) Highland Income Fund, NexPoint Strategic 

Opportunities Fund, Highland Global Allocation Fund, and NexPoint Capital, Inc. (collectively, 

the “Funds”); (ii) Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P. 

(together, the “Advisors”); and (iii) The Dugaboy Investment Trust (the “Trust,” and together with 

James Dondero, the Advisors, and the Funds, the “Appellants”) appealed the Confirmation Order.9 

The only aspects of the Injunction Provision challenged by the Appellants were: 

x The Permanent Injunction which the Appellants argued (i) is overbroad and vague 

because “implementation” and “consummation” were not defined; (ii) restricts 

certain of the Appellants’ rights under contracts assumed via the Plan; and (iii) is 

an impermissible third-party release; and 

x The Gatekeeper Provision which Appellants argued exceeded the Bankruptcy 

Court’s jurisdiction. 

Ex. 3, Appx. 74-75. No Appellant challenged or appealed the language of the Injunction Provision 

that “enjoin[s] [all Enjoined Parties]. . . from directly or indirectly (i) commencing, conducting, or 

continuing in any manner any suit, action, or other proceeding of any kind (including any 

proceeding in a judicial, arbitral, administrative or other forum) against or affecting the Debtor or 

the property of the Debtor.” That is the language enjoining Plaintiff from continuing this Action. 

D. Motions to Stay Pending Appeals of Confirmation Order are Filed and Denied 

12. In March 2021, the Appellants also sought a stay of the Confirmation Order 

pending appeal (the “Bankruptcy Court Stay Motions”).10 

13. Unlike the Appellants, however, Plaintiff never objected to the Plan and never 

appealed the Confirmation Order. 

9

 See Bankruptcy Docket Nos. 1990, 1986, 1988, and 1992, respectively (Exs. 5-8, Appx. 249-273). 

10 See Bankruptcy Docket Nos. 1955, 1967, 1971, and 1973, respectively (Exs. 9-12, Appx. 274-381). 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 9 of 15 PageID 43

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 15

000074

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 43 of 235 PageID 136
7 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

14. On March 16, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order Certifying Appeals of 

the Confirmation Order for Direct Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth 

Circuit [Bankr. Dkt. No. 2034] (the “Certification Order”). (Ex. 13, Appx. 382-384). 

15. On March 24, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court entered orders11 denying the Bankruptcy 

Court Stay Motions (the “First Stay Denials”), finding, among other things, that Appellants “did 

not meet their burden of proof on the four-factor test articulated in case law to obtain a 

discretionary stay pending appeal.” [Bankr. Dkt. No. 2095 at 3]. (Ex. 15, Appx. 392).

16. In April 2021, Appellants filed motions for a stay pending appeal of the 

Confirmation Order in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (the 

“District Court”) (collectively, the “District Court Stay Motions”).12

17. Appellants subsequently filed petitions for direct appeal of the Confirmation Order 

to the Fifth Circuit.13 On May 4, 2021, the Fifth Circuit entered an Order granting the Advisors’ 

Petition for direct appeal,14 and on June 2, 2021, the Fifth Circuit entered an Order granting the 

remaining Appellants’ Petitions for direct appeal (collectively, the “Appeal”).15

18. Shortly after the District Court Stay Motions became ripe, on May 19, 2021, the 

Advisors filed a stay motion in the Fifth Circuit pending appeal of the Confirmation Order based 

on arguments identical to those asserted in the District Court Stay Motions (the “Fifth Circuit Stay 

11 See Bankruptcy Docket Nos. 2084 and 2095, respectively. Exs. 14-15, Appx. 385-393. 

12 See Case Nos. 3:21-cv-550 (Docket No. 5) Ex. 16, Appx. 394-398; 3:21-cv-538 (Docket No. 2) Ex. 17, Appx. 399-

403; 3:21-cv-539, and 3:21-cv-546. 

13 See Case No. 21-90011, Documents 515826308, 515803515, 515824511, 515824443. Exs. 18-21, Appx. 404-953. 

14 See Case No. 21-90011, Document 515847079. Ex. 22, Appx. 954-957. 

15 See Case No. 21-90011, Document 515884578. Ex. 23, Appx. 958-961. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 10 of 15 PageID 44

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 15

000075

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 44 of 235 PageID 137
8 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

Motion”).16 On June 21, 2021, the Fifth Circuit denied the Fifth Circuit Stay Motion (the “Second 

Stay Denial”).17

19. On June 23, 2021, the District Court entered its Order denying the District Court 

Stay Motions [Dist. Ct. Docket No. 28] (Ex. 26, Appx. 999-1002) (the “Third Stay Denial,” and 

together with the First Stay Orders and Second Stay Order, the “Stay Denials”) on the ground that 

“the Fifth Circuit has already reviewed and denied a motion with identical arguments.” Id. at 3. 

E. Plaintiff Commences the Action but Never Serves Highland, and the Plan Goes 

Effective 

20. On July 22, 2021, Plaintiff commenced the Action by filing its Original Complaint. 

[Docket No. 1] (the “Complaint”). Plaintiff never served the Complaint. 

21. On August 11, 2021, the Plan became Effective (as defined in the Plan), and 

Highland became the Reorganized Debtor (as defined in the Plan). See Notice of Occurrence of 

Effective Date of Confirmed Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. [Bankr. Dkt. No. 2700] (Ex. 27, Appx. 1003-1007).

F. Plaintiff Moves for a Stay of the Action 

22. On August 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Stay Motion, requesting a stay of the Action 

pending resolution of the Fifth Circuit Appeal of the Confirmation Order. In support of its Motion, 

Plaintiff contended that the Appeal “includes direct challenges to the validity” of the Plan’s 

exculpation and injunction provisions, that these “provisions are currently in force and prohibit 

Plaintiffs from continuing this [A]ction,” and the “most efficient course of action” is for a stay. 

Stay Motion at 4. As discussed below, even if this Court determines that the Appeal of the 

Confirmation Order is somehow relevant, the Motion would still be denied as no aspect of the 

16 See Case No. 21-10449, Document 515869234. Ex. 24, Appx. 962-995. 

17 See Case No. 21-10449, Document 515906886. Ex. 25, Appx. 996-998. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 11 of 15 PageID 45

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 15

000076

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 45 of 235 PageID 138
9 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

Appeal challenges the provisions of the Injunction Provision that enjoin Plaintiff from prosecuting 

the Action in this Court. 

23. For the reasons that follow, the Court should (a) re-open the Order, amend the 

findings and conclusions, and issue a new order denying the Stay Motion, and (b) grant such other 

and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. 

III. ARGUMENT 

Plaintiff Failed to Demonstrate a Stay Was Warranted 

24. As set forth herein, there was no factual, legal, or equitable basis for the Stay 

Motion and, pursuant to Rule 59, this Court should re-open the Order, amend the findings and 

conclusions, and issue a new order denying the Stay Motion. 

25. Plaintiff failed to address, let alone satisfy, the strict four-pronged test required for 

a stay pending appeal in the Fifth Circuit. A stay pending appeal is warranted only if a movant 

establishes the following four elements: (1) substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its 

appeal; (2) irreparable injury if the stay is not granted; (3) the stay will not substantially harm other 

parties; and (4) the stay would serve the public interest. See Belcher v. Birmingham Trust Nat’l 

Bank, 395 F.2d 685, 686-87 (5th Cir. 1968); In re First S. Sav. Assoc., 820 F.2d 700, 704 (5th Cir. 

1987). The moving party “bears the burden of establishing its need,” and must ‘make out a clear 

case of hardship or inequity in being required to go forward.” Earl v. Boeing Co., 4:19-CV-507, 

2021 WL 1080689, at *3 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2021) (internal quotations omitted). 

26. For obvious reasons, Plaintiff ignored these four factors in its Motion. Plaintiff did 

not object to or appeal the Confirmation Order. Instead, Plaintiff sought a stay of the Action 

premised on a pending Appeal (a) in which (i) it is not a party and (ii) there is no challenge to the 

portion of the Injunction Provision prohibiting Plaintiff from proceeding with the Action in this 

Court, and (b) where three different courts, including this Court and the Fifth Circuit, issued the 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 12 of 15 PageID 46

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 15

000077

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 46 of 235 PageID 139
10 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

Stay Denials against the Appellants when they requested stays pending this same Appeal. Plaintiff 

has no standing to seek a stay of an order pending an Appeal to which they are not a party and, 

therefore, cannot satisfy the “likelihood of success” element. Plaintiff equally fails to show any 

irreparable injury in the absence of a stay or that a stay would serve the public interest. 

27. Moreover, Plaintiff’s vague and conclusory assertion that “many complex legal 

questions exist” in the Fifth Circuit Appeal that “may affect the viability of this Action” also does 

not support the imposition of a stay. Motion at 4. Again, three courts, including the Fifth Circuit, 

have already rejected Stay Motions premised on this Appeal. 

28. Finally, Plaintiff’s reliance on the Appellants’ challenges to Injunction Provision 

are misguided. See Motion at 4. As set forth above, the Appellants are challenging the Permanent 

Injunction and the Gatekeeper Provision in their appeal of the Confirmation Order – not the 

provisions of the Injunction Provision relevant to the Motion, i.e., the provision enjoining Plaintiff 

from continuing the Action in this Court. Highland maintains that the Action belongs in the 

Bankruptcy Court for many reasons, including the Injunction Provision, and that if Plaintiff wishes 

to pursue remedies that it should do so by seeking leave to file a late claim against Highland’s 

bankruptcy estate as required by the Plan and Confirmation Order. However, pursuant to this very 

provision, the remedy of a stay of proceedings is an entirely distinct procedural device that has no 

application to the Plan or the Appeal. 

29. To the extent Plaintiff relies on the exculpation provision, such reliance is irrelevant 

for purposes of the Motion.18 Plaintiff otherwise failed to demonstrate why the extraordinary 

remedy of a stay of this Action is warranted or appropriate 

18 That provision deals with the exculpation from liability of Highland’s independent directors, their agents, and their 

advisors. See Plan, Art. IX.C. Neither Highland nor the viability of this Action is implicated by such a provision. 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 13 of 15 PageID 47

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 15

000078

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 47 of 235 PageID 140
11 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

CONCLUSION 

WHEREFORE, Highland respectfully requests that the Court (a) re-open the Stay Order, 

amend the findings and conclusions, and issue a new order denying the Stay Motion, and (b) grant 

such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: October 5, 2021. PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No. 143717) 

Robert J. Feinstein (NY Bar No. 1767805) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 266326) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com 

 jmorris@pszjlaw.com 

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

 hwinograd@pszjlaw.com 

-andHAYWARD PLLC 

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable 

 Melissa S. Hayward (Texas Bar No. 24044908) 

Zachery Z. Annable (Texas Bar No. 24053075) 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Telephone: (972) 755-7100 

Facsimile: (972) 755-7110 

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com 

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com 

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 14 of 15 PageID 48

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 15

000079

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 48 of 235 PageID 141
12 

DOCS_NY:44199.3 36027/003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that, on October 5, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Memorandum of Law was served electronically upon all parties registered to receive electronic 

notice in this case via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable

Zachery Z. Annable 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 9 Filed 10/05/21 Page 15 of 15 PageID 49

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 9 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:44:27 Desc Main

Document Page 15 of 15

000080

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 49 of 235 PageID 142
DOCS_NY:44220.1 36027/003

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No. 143717) 

Robert J. Feinstein (NY Bar No. 1767805) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 266326) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com 

 jmorris@pszjlaw.com 

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

 hwinograd@pszjlaw.com 

-andHAYWARD PLLC 

Melissa S. Hayward 

Texas Bar No. 24044908 

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com 

Zachery Z. Annable 

Texas Bar No. 24053075 

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Tel: (972) 755-7100 

Fax: (972) 755-7110 

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

THE CHARITABLE DAF FUND, L.P., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 3:21-cv-01710-N 

APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.’S 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF STAY ORDER 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID 50

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 5

000081

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 50 of 235 PageID 143
DOCS_NY:44220.1 36027/003

Ex. Description Appx. # 

1. Summary of Dondero and Related Entity Litigation 1-15 

2. Summary of Dondero and Related Entities Motions to Continue, Stay, or 

Abate 

16-19 

3. Order (i) Confirming the Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. (as Modified) and (ii) Granting 

Related Relief, Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1943 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Feb. 

22, 2021) 

20-181 

4. Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, 

L.P. (as Modified), Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1808 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 

Jan. 22, 2021) 

182-248 

5. James Dondero’s Notice of Appeal, Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1990 

(Bankr. N.D. Tex. March 8, 2021) 

249-252 

6. Highland Income Fund, NexPoint Strategic Opportunities Fund, Highland 

Global Allocation Fund, and NexPoint Capital, Inc.’s Notice of Appeal, 

Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1986 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. March 8, 2021) 

253-260 

7. Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint 

Advisors, L.P.’s Notice of Appeal, Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1988 

(Bankr. N.D. Tex. March 8, 2021) 

261-264 

8. The Dugaboy Investment Trust and Get Good Trust’s Notice of Appeal, 

Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1992 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. March 8, 2021

265-273 

9. Emergency Motion of the Advisors for Stay Pending Appeal of the 

Confirmation Order, and Brief in Support Thereof, Case No. 19-34054-sgj, 

D.I. 1955 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2021) 

274-308 

10. Motion for Stay Pending Appeal of the Court’s Order Confirming the 

Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan, Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1967 (Bankr. 

N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2021) 

309-329 

11. Joinder to Motions for Stay Pending Appeal of the Court’s Order 

Confirming the Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan, Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 

1971 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2021) 

330-375 

12. Joinder in Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Additional Grounds for the 

Issuance of a Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 19-34054-sgj, D.I. 1973 

(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2021) 

376-381 

13. Order Certifying Appeals of the Confirmation Order for Direct Appeal to 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Case No. 19-

34054-sgj11, D.I. 2034 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2021) 

382-384 

14. Order on Motions for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 19-34054-sgj11, D.I. 

2084 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2021) 

385-388 

15. Supplemental Order on Motions for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 19-

34054-sgj11, D.I. 2095 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2021)

389-393 

16. Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 3:21-cv-00550-L, D.I. 5 (N.D. 

Tex. Apr. 6, 2021) 

394-398 

17. Appellants’ Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 3:21-cv-00538-N, 

D.I. 2 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2021) 

399-403 

18. Nexpoint Advisors, L.P. and Highland Capital Management Fund 

Advisors, L.P.’s Petition for Permission to Appeal (Direct Appeal From 

404-652 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID 51

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 5

000082

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 51 of 235 PageID 144
DOCS_NY:44220.1 36027/003

Bankruptcy Court, 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)), Case No. 21-90011 (5th Cir. March 

31, 2021)

19. Highland Income Fund, NexPoint Strategic Opportunities Fund, Highland 

Global Allocation Fund and NexPoint Capital, Inc.’s Petition for Direct 

Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), Case No. 21-90011 (5th Cir. April 14, 

2021)

653-918 

20. The Dugaboy Investment Trust and Get Good Trust’s Petition for Direct 

Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), Case No. 21-90011 (5th Cir. April 15, 

2021)

919-935 

21. James Dondero’s Petition for Direct Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), 

Case No. 21-90011 (5th Cir. April 15, 2021)

936-953 

22. Order, Case No. 21-90011 (5th Cir. May 4, 2021) 954-957 

23. Order, Case No. 21-90011 (5th Cir. June 2, 2021) 958-961 

24. Appellants’ Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Case No. 21-10449 (5th Cir. 

May 19, 2021) 

962-995 

25. Order, Case No. 21-10449 (5th Cir. June 21, 2021) 996-998 

26. Order, Case No. 3:21-cv-00550-L, D.I. 28 (N.D. Tex. June 23, 2021) 999-1002 

27. Notice of Occurrence of Effective Date of Confirmed Fifth Amended Plan 

of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P., Case No. 19-

34054-sgj, D.I. 2700 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2021) 

1003-1007 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID 52

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 5

000083

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 52 of 235 PageID 145
DOCS_NY:44220.1 36027/003

Dated: October 5, 2021. PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No. 143717) 

Ira D. Kharasch (CA Bar No. 109084) 

John A. Morris (NY Bar No. 266326) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) 

Hayley R. Winograd (NY Bar No. 5612569) 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 ikharasch@pszjlaw.com 

 jmorris@pszjlaw.com 

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

 hwinograd@pszjlaw.com 

-andHAYWARD PLLC

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable 

 Melissa S. Hayward 

Texas Bar No. 24044908 

MHayward@HaywardFirm.com 

Zachery Z. Annable 

Texas Bar No. 24053075 

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Tel: (972) 755-7100 

Fax: (972) 755-7110 

Counsel for Highland Capital Management, L.P.

 

 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10 Filed 10/05/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID 53

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 5

000084

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 53 of 235 PageID 146
DOCS_NY:44220.1 36027/003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that, on October 5, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appendix 

was served electronically upon all parties registered to receive electronic notice in this case via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Zachery Z. Annable

Zachery Z. Annable 

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10 Filed 10/05/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID 54

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 5

000085

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 54 of 235 PageID 147
EXHIBIT 

Appx. 0001

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 15 PageID 55

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 1 Page 1 of 15

000086

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 55 of 235 PageID 148
SUMMARY OF DONDERO AND RELATED ENTITY LITIGATION* 

* The following is by way of summary only and does not include discovery disputes or similar matters. Nothing herein shall be deemed or considered a waiver of any rights or an admission of fact. The Debtor reserves all rights that it may have whether in law or in equity. DOCS_NY:42718.13 36027/002 

In re Highland Capital Management, L.P., Case No. 19-34054-sgj11 (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)9/23/20 Debtor’s Motion for Entry of an Order Approving Settlement with (a) Acis Capital Management, L.P. and Acis Capital Management GP LLC 

(Claim No. 23), (b) Joshua N. Terry and Jennifer G. Terry (Claim No. 156), and (c) Acis Capital Management, L.P. (Claim No. 159) and Authorizing Actions Consistent Therewith [D.I. 1087]Objectors: Dondero 

[D.I. 1121]

Acis filed a claim for at least $75 million. Acis claim was the result of an involuntary bankruptcy initiated when the Debtor refused to pay an arbitration award and instead transferred assets to become judgment proof. Debtor settled claim for an allowed Class 8 claim of $23 million and approximately $1 million in cash payments. Dondero objected to the settlement alleging that it was unreasonable and constituted vote buying.

The Acis Settlement Motion was approved and Dondero’s objection was overruled [D.I. 1302].

Dondero appealed [D.I. 1347]. The appeal has been briefed and the decision is pending.

11/18/20 Motion of the Debtor Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) and 363(b) for Authority to Enter into Sub-Servicer Agreements [D.I. 1424]

Objectors: Dondero 

[D.I. 1447]

The Debtor filed a motion seeking to retain a subservicer to assist in its reorganization consistent with the proposed plan. Dondero alleged that the sub-servicer 

was not needed; was too expensive; and would not be subject to Bankruptcy Court jurisdiction [D.I. 1447].

Dondero withdrew his objection [D.I. 1460] after forcing the Debtor to incur costs responding [D.I. 1459]

N/A

11/19/20 James Dondero’s Motion for Entry of an Order Requiring Notice and Hearing for Future Estate Transactions Occurring Outside of the 

Ordinary Course [D.I. 1439]Movant: Dondero Dondero alleged the Debtor sold significant assets in 

violation of 11 U.S.C. § 363 and without providing 

Dondero a chance to bid. Dondero requested an emergency hearing on this motion [D.I. 1443]. Dondero filed this motion despite having agreed to the Protocols governing such sales.

Dondero withdrew this motion [D.I. 1622] after the Debtor and the Committee were forced to incur costs responding and preparing for trial [D.I. 1546, 1551].

N/A

12/8/20 Motion for Order Imposing Temporary Restrictions on Debtor’s Ability, as Portfolio Manager, to Initiate Sales by Non-Debtor 

CLO Vehicles [D.I. 1522]Movants: Advisors Movants argued that the Debtor should be precluded 

from causing the CLOs to sell assets without Movants’ consent. Movants provided no support for this position which directly contradicted the terms of the CLO Agreements; and was filed notwithstanding the Protocols which governed such sales. Movants requested an emergency hearing on this motion [D.I. 1523].

The motion was denied [D.I. 1605] and was characterized as “frivolous.”

N/A

Funds

Appx. 0002

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 15 PageID 56 Exhibit 1 Page 2 of 15

000087

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 56 of 235 PageID 149
2

12/23/20 Debtor’s Motion for Entry of an Order Approving Settlement with HarbourVest (Claim Nos. 143, 147, 150, 153, 154) and Authorizing Actions

Consistent Therewith [D.I. 1625]

Objectors: Dondero 

[D.I. 1697]

The HarbourVest Entities asserted claims in excess of $300 million in connection with an investment in a fund indirectly managed by the Debtor for, among other things, fraud and fraudulent inducement, concealment, and misrepresentation. Debtor settled for an allowed Class 8 claim of $45 million and an allowed Class 9 claim of $35 million. Dondero and the Trusts alleged that the settlement was unreasonable; was a windfall to the HarbourVest Entities; and constituted vote buying. CLOH argued that the settlement could not be effectuated under the operative documents.

CLOH withdrew its objection at the hearing. The settlement was approved and the remaining objections were overruled [D.I. 1788].

The Trusts appealed [D.I. 1870], and the appeal has been briefed. CLOH recently filed a complaint alleging, among other things, that the settlement was a breach of fiduciary duty and a RICO violation.

Trusts [D.I. 1706]CLOH [D.I. 1707]

1/14/21 Motion to Appoint Examiner Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1104(c) [D.I. 1752]

Movants: Trusts Movants sought the appointment of an examiner 14 

months after the Petition Date and commencement of Plan solicitation to assess the legitimacy of the claims against the various Dondero Entities and to avoid litigation. Movants requested an emergency hearing on this motion [D.I. 1748].

The motion was denied [D.I. 1960].

N/A

Dondero [D.I. 1756]

1/20/21 James Dondero’s Objection to Debtor’s Proposed Assumption of Executory Contracts and Cure Amounts Proposed in 

Connection Therewith [D.I. 1784]Objector: Dondero Dondero objected to the Debtor’s proposed assumption 

of the limited partnership agreement governing the Debtor and MSCF [D.I. 1719].

Dondero withdrew his objection [D.I. 1876] after forcing the Debtor to incur the expense of responding (which included a statement that the Debtor limited partnership agreement was not being assumed).

N/A

Appx. 0003

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 15 PageID 57 Exhibit 1 Page 3 of 15

000088

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 57 of 235 PageID 150
3

1/22/20 Objections to Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization [D.I. 1472]

Objectors:

1 All objections to the Plan were consensually resolved 

prior to the confirmation hearing except for the objections of the Dondero Entities and the U.S. Trustee. The U.S. Trustee did not press its objection at confirmation. 

All objections were overruled and the Confirmation Order was entered. The Confirmation Order specifically found that Mr. Dondero would “burn the place down” if his case resolution plan was not accepted. 

Dondero, the Trusts, the Advisors, and the Funds appealed [D.I. 1957, 1966, 1970, 1972]. The appeal is being briefed.

Dondero[D.I. 1661]

Trusts[D.I. 1667]

Advisors & Funds2 [D.I. 

1670]

SeniorEmployees [D.I. 1669]

HCRE [D.I. 1673]

CLOH[D.I. 1675]

NexBank Entities [D.I. 1676]

1/24/21 Application for Allowance of Administrative Expense Claim [D.I. 1826]

Movants: Advisors The Advisors seek an administrative expense claim for 

approximately $14 million they allege they overpaid to the Debtor during the bankruptcy case under the Shared Services Agreement. Notably, the Advisors have not paid $14 million to the Debtor during the bankruptcy.

This matter is currently being litigated.

N/A

2/3/21 NexBank’s Application for Allowance of Administrative Expense Claim [D.I. 1888]

Movant: NexBank NexBank seeks an administrative expense claim for 

reimbursement of $2.5 million paid to the Debtor under its Shared Services Agreement and investment advisory agreement. NexBank alleges that it did not receive the services.

This matter is currently being litigated.

N/A

1 In addition to the Dondero Entities’ objections, the following objections were filed: State Taxing Authorities [D.I. 1662]; Former Employees [D.I. 1666]; IRS 

[D.I. 1668]; US Trustee [D.I. 1671]; Daugherty [D.I. 1678]. These objections were either resolved prior to confirmation or not pressed at confirmation. 

2 In addition to the Funds, this objection was joined by: Highland Fixed Income Fund, Highland Funds I and its series, Highland Funds II and its series, Highland 

Healthcare Opportunities Fund, Highland Merger Arbitrate Fund, Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund, Highland Small-Cap Equity Fund, Highland Socially Responsible Equity Fund, Highland Total Return Fund, Highland/iBoxx Senior Loan ETF, NexPoint Real Estate Strategies Fund, NexPoint Real Estate Finance 

Inc., NexPoint Real Estate Capital, LLC, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc., NexPoint Hospitality Trust, NexPoint Real Estate Partners, LLC, NexPoint Multifamily 

Capital Trust, Inc., VineBrook Homes Trust, Inc., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors II, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors III, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors IV, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors V, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors VI, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors VII, L.P., and NexPoint Real Estate Advisors VIII, L.P. [D.I. 1677]. 

Appx. 0004

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 4 of 15 PageID 58 Exhibit 1 Page 4 of 15

000089

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 58 of 235 PageID 151
4

2/8/21 James Dondero Motion for Status Conference [D.I. 1914]

Movant: Dondero Dondero requested a chambers conference to convince 

the Court to delay confirmation of the Plan to allow for continued negotiation of the “pot plan.”

The request was denied [D.I. 1929] after the Debtor and Committee informally objected.

N/A.

2/28/21 Motions for Stay Pending Appeal

Movants: The only parties requesting a stay pending appeal were 

the Dondero Entities. They alleged a number of potential harms to the Dondero Entities if a stay was not granted and offered to post a $1 million bond.

Relief was denied [D.I. 2084, 2095] and a number of the Movants’ arguments were found to be frivolous. 

Movants sought a stay pending appeal from this Court.

Dondero [D.I. 1973]

Advisors [D.I. 1955]

Funds [D.I. 1967]

Trusts [D.I. 1971]

3/18/21 James Dondero, Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P., NexPoint Advisors, L.P., The Dugaboy Investment Trust, The Get Good 

Trust, and NexPoint Real Estate Partners, LLC, f/k/a HCRE Partners, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company’s Motion to RecusePursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455 [D.I. 2060]Movants: Dondero

AdvisorsTrustsHCRE

Dondero argued that Judge Jernigan should recuse herself as her rulings against him and his related entities were evidence of her bias.

Judge Jernigan denied the motion without briefing from any other party on March 23, 2021 [D.I. 2083].

The Movants appealed [D.I. 2149].The opening brief and the Debtor’s response have been filed.

4/15/21 Debtor’s Motion for Entry of an Order Approving Settlement with UBS Securities LLC and UBS AG London Branch and Authorizing Actions 

Consistent Therewith [D.I. 2199]

Movants: Debtor UBS Securities LLC and UBS AG London Branch 

(collectively, “UBS”) asserted claims against the Debtor in excess of $1 billion arising from two Debtor-managed 

funds’ breach of contract in 2008. The settlement resolved ten plus years of litigation but had to be renegotiated when the Debtor discovered that the Dondero-controlled Debtor had caused the funds to transfer cash and securities with a face amount of over $300 million to a Cayman-based Dondero controlled 

entity in 2017, presumably to thwart UBS’s ability to collect on its judgment. 

The only parties to object were Dondero [D.I. 2295] and Dugaboy [D.I. 2268, 2293]. The Debtor filed an omnibus reply on May 14, 2021 [D.I. 2308]. UBS also filed a reply [D.I. 2310]. The UBS settlement was approved on May 24, 2021 [D.I. 2389].

The objectors appealed the settlement.

Appx. 0005

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 5 of 15 PageID 59 Exhibit 1 Page 5 of 15

000090

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 59 of 235 PageID 152
5

4/23/21 Debtor’s Motion for an Order Requiring the Violators to Show Cause Why They Should Not Be Held in Civil Contempt for Violatin

g

Two Court Orders [D.I. 2247]Movants: Debtor Debtor filed a motion seeking an order to show cause as 

to why Dondero, CLOH, DAF, and their counsel should not be held in contempt of court for willingly violating two final Bankruptcy Court orders. The Bankruptcy Court entered an order to show cause on April 29, 2021 [D.I. 2255] and set an in-person hearing for June 8, 2021. 

Dondero, CLOH, the DAF, Mark Patrick (allegedly the person in control of the DAF), and their counsel filed responses to the order to show cause on May 14, 2021 [D.I. 2309, 2312, 2313]. The Debtor filed its reply on May 21, 2021 [D.I. 2350]. On August 4, 2021, the Court found each of Dondero, CLOH, the DAF, Patrick, and Sbaiti & Co. in contempt of court [D.I. 2660]

Dondero has appealed [D.I. 2712]

4/23/21 Motion for Modification of Order Authorizing Appointment of James P. Seery, Jr. Due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [D.I. 2242]

Movants: Debtor DAF and CLOH filed a motion asking the Bankruptcy 

Court to modify the July 16, 2020, order appointing Seery as the Debtor’s CEO/CRO alleging the Bankruptcy Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. 

On May 14, 2021, the Debtor filed a response [D.I. 2311]stating that DAF and CLOH’s motion was a collateral attack and barred by res judicata, among other things. The Committee joined in the Debtor’s response [D.I. 2315]. DAF and CLOH filed their reply on May 21, 2021 [D.I. 2347]. The Motion was denied on June 25, 2021 [D.I. 2506]

DAF and CLOH have appealed. [D.I. 2513] but are seeking to stay the appeal and the filing of their opening brief.

4/20/21 Debtor’s Motion for Entry of an Order (i) Authorizing the Debtor to (a) Enter into Exit Financing Agreement in Aid of Confirmed Chapter 

11 Plan and (b) Incur and Pay Related Fees and Expenses and (ii) Granting Related Relief [D.I. 2229]Movants: Debtor The Debtor filed a motion seeking authority to enter into 

an exit financing facility. The facility was required, in part, to fund the increased costs to the estate from Dondero’s litigiousness. Dugaboy filed two objections to the motion alleging, among other things, that there was no basis for the financing [D.I. 2403; 2467]

The motion was granted on June 30 [D.I. 2503]

N/A

Appx. 0006

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 6 of 15 PageID 60 Exhibit 1 Page 6 of 15

000091

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 60 of 235 PageID 153
6

4/29/21 Motion to Compel Compliance with Bankruptcy Rule 2015.3 [D.I. 2256]

Movants: Trusts The Trusts filed a motion on negative notice seeking to 

compel the Debtor to file certain reports under Rule 2015.3 [D.I. 2256]. The Debtor opposed that motion on May 20, 2021 [D.I. 2341], which was joined by the Committee [D.I. 2343]. The Trusts filed their reply on June 8, 2021 [D.I. 2424]

A hearing was held on June 10, 2021 [D.I. 2442] and the motion was adjourned. The motion was denied as moot on September 7, 2021 [D.I. 2812]

The Trusts appealed [D.I. 2840]

6/25/21 Debtor’s Motion for Entry of an Order (i) Authorizing the (a) Creation of an Indemnity Subtrust and (b) entry into an Indemnity Trust 

Agreement and (ii) Granting Related Relief [D.I. 2491]Movants: Debtor The Debtor filed a motion seeking authority to create an 

indemnity trust to secure the Reorganized Debtor, Claimant Trust, and Litigation Trust’s indemnification obligations [D.I. 2491]. Dondero, HCMFA, NPA, and Dugaboy objected [D.I. 2563] arguing that it constitutedan improper plan modification. The Debtor and the Committee filed replies in support [D.I. 2576, 2577]

A hearing was held and the Debtor’s motion was granted [D.I. 2599]. 

Dondero, HCMFA, NPA, and Dugaboy appealed [D.I. 2673]

8/3/21 James Dondero’s First Amended Motion for Entry of an Order (i) Compelling Mediation and (ii) Granting Related Relief [D.I. 2657]

Movants: Dondero Dondero filed a motion to compel mediation nearly six 

months after confirmation of the Debtor’s plan [D.I. 

2657]. The Debtor filed a response setting forth certain conditions for the appointment of a mediator [D.I. 2756].

Dondero withdrew his motion to compel mediation after reviewing the Debtor’s conditions [D.I. 2763]

N/A

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. James D. Dondero, Adv. Proc. No. 20-03190-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)12/7/20 Plaintiff Highland Capital Management, L.P.’s Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction against

Mr. James Dondero [D.I. 2]Movant: Debtor The Debtor commenced an adversary proceeding 

seeking an injunction against Dondero. Dondero actively interfered with the management of the estate. Seery had instructed Debtor employees to sell certain securities on behalf of the CLOs. Dondero disagreed with Seery’s direction and intervened to prevent these sales from being executed. Dondero also threatened Seery via text message and sent threatening emails to other Debtor employees.

A TRO was entered on December 10 [D.I. 10], which prohibited Dondero from, among other things, interfering with the Debtor’s estate and communicating with Debtor employees unless it related to the Shared Services Agreements. A preliminary injunction was entered on January 12 after an exhaustive evidentiary hearing [D.I. 59].This matter was resolved consensually by order entered 

Dondero appealed to the District Court, which declined to hear the interlocutory appeal. Dondero is seeking a writ of mandamus from the Fifth Circuit. The writ of mandamus was withdrawn as part of the settlement. 

Appx. 0007

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 7 of 15 PageID 61 Exhibit 1 Page 7 of 15

000092

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 61 of 235 PageID 154
7

May 18, 2021 [D.I. 182], which enjoined Dondero from certain conduct until the close of the Bankruptcy Case.

1/7/21 Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order Requiring Mr. James Dondero to Show Cause Why He Should Not Be Held in Civil Contempt for 

Violating the TRO [D.I. 48]Movant: Debtor In late December, the Debtor discovered that Dondero 

had violated the TRO in multiple ways, including by destroying his cell phone, his text messages, and conspiring with the Debtor’s then general counsel and assistant general counsel3 to coordinate offensive 

litigation against the Debtor. The hearing on this matter was delayed and there was litigation on evidentiary issues, among other things. An extensive evidentiary hearing was held on March 22.

The Court entered an order finding Mr. Dondero in contempt of court on June 7, 2021 [D.I. 190]

Mr. Dondero has appealed [D.I. 212]

3 As a result of this conduct, among other things, the Debtor terminated its general counsel and assistant general counsel for cause on January 5, 2021. 

Appx. 0008

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 8 of 15 PageID 62 Exhibit 1 Page 8 of 15

000093

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 62 of 235 PageID 155
8

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P., NexPoint Advisors, L.P., Highland Income Fund, NexPoint Strategic Opportunities Fund, NexPoint Capital, Inc., and CLO Holdco, Ltd., Adv. Proc. No. 

21-03000-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)

1/6/21 Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Against Certain Entities Owned 

and/or Controlled by Mr. James Dondero [D.I. 2]Movant: Debtor In late December, the Debtor received a number of 

threatening letters from the Funds, the Advisors, and CLOH regarding the Debtor’s management of the CLOs. These letters reiterated the arguments made by these parties in their motion filed on December 8, which the Court concluded were “frivolous.” The relief requested by the Debtor was necessary to prevent the Funds, Advisors, and CLOH’s improper interference in the Debtor’s management of its estate. 

The parties agreed to the entry of a temporary restraining order on January 13 [D.I. 20]. A hearing on a preliminary injunction began on January 26 and was continued to May 7. The TRO was further extended with the parties’ consent [D.I. 64]. The Debtor reached an agreement with CLOH and dismissed CLOH from the 

adversary proceeding. The Debtor has reached an agreement in principle with the Funds and Advisors that settled this matter, and filed its 9019 motion.

N/A

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P., Adv. Proc. No. 21-03010-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)2/17/21 Debtor’s Emergency Motion for a Mandatory Injunction Requiring the Advisors to Adopt and Implement a Plan for the Transition of Services

by February 28, 2021 [D.I. 2]Movant: Debtor The Debtor’s Plan called for a substantial reduction in 

its work force. As part of this process, the Debtor terminated the Shared Services Agreements and began negotiating a transition plan with the Advisors that would enable them to continue providing services to the retail funds they managed without interruption. The Debtor was led to believe that without the Debtor’s assistance the Advisors would not be able to provide services to their retail funds, and, although the Debtor had proceed appropriately, the Debtor was concerned it would be brought into any action brought by the SEC against the Advisors if they could not service the funds. 

At a daylong hearing, the Advisors testified that they had a transition plan in place. An order was entered on February 24 [D.I. 25] making factual findings and ruling that the injunction was moot. The 

parties recently entered into astipulation regarding discovery for the remaining breach of contract claim. This action was consolidated with the Advisors’ 

N/A

Appx. 0009

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 9 of 15 PageID 63 Exhibit 1 Page 9 of 15

000094

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 63 of 235 PageID 156
9

The Debtor brought this action to force the Advisors to formulate a transition plan and to avoid exposure to theSEC, among others.

admin claim since both matters arise from Shared Services Agreements.

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. James Dondero, Adv. Proc. No. 21-03003-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)1/22/21 Complaint for (i) Breach of Contract and (ii) Turnover of Property of the Debtor’s Estate [D.I. 1]

Movant: Debtor Dondero borrowed $8.825 million from Debtor 

pursuant to a demand note. Dondero did not pay when the note was called and the Debtor was forced to file an adversary. Dondero subsequently amended his answer 

to add a series of affirmative defenses, including that the notes had been forgiven because of an undocumented oral agreement with Dondero’s sister.

The parties are currently conducting discovery and engaging in motion practice.The parties entered into a global revised scheduling agreement for all five notes litigations.

N/A

4/15/21 James Dondero’s Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support to Withdraw the Reference [D.I. 21]

Movant: Dondero Three months after the complaint was filed Dondero 

filed a motion to withdraw the bankruptcy reference and a motion to stay the adversary pending resolution of his motion [D.I. 22].

A hearing was held on May 25, 2021, and a stay was granted until mid-July 2021. The Court 

transmitted a report and recommendation on July 7 [D.I. 69]. Dondero filed a limited objection to the R&R.

N/A

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P., Adv. Proc. No. 21-03004-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)1/22/21 Complaint for (i) Breach of Contract and (ii) Turnover of Property of the Debtor’s Estate [D.I. 1]

Movant: Debtor HCMFA borrowed $7.4 million from Debtor pursuant 

to a demand note. Dondero did not pay when the note was called and the Debtor was forced to file an adversary. HCMFA subsequently amended its answer 

to add a series of affirmative defenses, including that the notes had been forgiven because of an undocumented oral agreement between Dondero and his sister.

The parties are currently conducting discovery and engaging in motion practice.The parties entered into a global revised scheduling agreement for all five notes litigations.

N/A

Appx. 0010

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 10 of 15 PageID 64 Exhibit 1 Page 10 of 15

000095

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 64 of 235 PageID 157
10

4/13/21 Defendants Motion to Withdraw the Reference [D.I. 20]

Movant: HCMFA Three months after the complaint was filed HCMFA 

filed a motion to withdraw the bankruptcy reference.

A hearing was held on May 25, 2021. The Court transmitted a R&R on July 9 [D.I. 52]. HCMFA filed a limited objection to the R&R.

N/A

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. NexPoint Advisors, L.P., Adv. Proc. No. 21-03005-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)1/22/21 Complaint for (i) Breach of Contract and (ii) Turnover of Property of the Debtor’s Estate [D.I. 1]

Movant: Debtor NPA borrowed approximately $30.75 million under an 

installment note. NPA did not pay the note when and the Debtor was forced to file an adversary. NPAsubsequently amended its answer to add a series of affirmative defenses, including that the notes had been forgiven because of an undocumented oral agreement between Dondero and his sister.

The parties are currently conducting discovery and engaging in motion practice.The parties entered into a global revised scheduling agreement for all five notes litigations.

N/A

4/13/21 Defendants Motion to Withdraw the Reference [D.I. 19]

Movant: NPA Three months after the complaint was filed HCMFA 

filed a motion to withdraw the bankruptcy reference.

A hearing was held on May 25, 2021. The Court transmitted a R&R on July 9 [D.I. 42]. NPA filed a limited objection to the R&R. The District Court adopted the R&R. [D. Ct. D.I.

10].

N/A

Appx. 0011

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 11 of 15 PageID 65 Exhibit 1 Page 11 of 15

000096

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 65 of 235 PageID 158
11

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. Highland Capital Management Services, Inc., Adv. Proc. No. 21-03006-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)1/22/21 Complaint for (i) Breach of Contract and (ii) Turnover of Property of the Debtor’s Estate [D.I. 1]

Movant: Debtor Highland Capital Management Services, Inc. 

(“HCMS”), borrowed $900,000 in demand notes and approximately $20.5 million in installment notes. HCMS did not pay the notes when due and the Debtor was forced to file an adversary. HCMS subsequently

amended its answer to add a series of affirmative defenses, including that the notes had been forgiven because of an undocumented oral agreement between Dondero and his sister.

The parties are currently conducting discovery andengaging in motion practice. The parties entered into a global revised scheduling agreement for all five notes litigations.

N/A

6/3/21 Defendants Motion to Withdraw the Reference [D.I. 19]

Movant HCMS Five months after the complaint was filed HCMS filed 

a motion to withdraw the reference.

A hearing was held on July 8, 2021. The Court issued its R&R on July 15, 2021 [D. I. 52]. HCMS filed a limited objection to the R&R. the District Court adopted the R&R. [D. Ct. Docket No. 5]. HCMS filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the District Court’s Order adopting R&R [D. Ct. Docket No. 8].

Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. HCRE Partners, LLC (n/k/a NexPoint Real Estate Partners, LLC), Adv. Proc. No. 21-03007-sgj (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)1/22/21 Complaint for (i) Breach of Contract and (ii) Turnover of Property of the Debtor’s Estate [D.I. 1]

Movant: Debtor HCRE borrowed $4.25 million in demand notes and 

approximately $6.05 million in installment notes. HCRE did not pay the notes when due and the Debtor was forced to file an adversary. HCRE subsequently

amended its answer to add a series of affirmative defenses, including that the notes had been forgiven because of an undocumented oral agreement between Dondero and his sister.

The parties are currently conducting discovery and engaging in motion practice. The parties entered into a global revised scheduling agreement for all five notes litigations.

N/A

6/3/21 Defendants Motion to Withdraw the Reference [D.I. 20]

Appx. 0012

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 12 of 15 PageID 66 Exhibit 1 Page 12 of 15

000097

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 66 of 235 PageID 159
12

Movant HCMS Five months after the complaint was filed HCMS filed 

a motion to withdraw the reference.

A hearing was held on July 8, 2021. The Court issued its R&R on July 15, 2021 [D.I. 47]. HCRE filed a limited objection to the R&R [D. Ct. Docket No. 5].

Charitable DAF Fund, L.P., and CLO Holdco, Ltd., v. Highland Capital Management, L.P., Highland HCF Advisor, Ltd., and Highland CLO Funding, Ltd., Case No. 21-cv-00842-B (N.D. Tex. April 12, 2021)4/12/21 Original Complaint

Movants: DAF Movants allege that the Debtor and Seery violated SEC 

rules, breached fiduciary duties, engaged in selfdealing, and violated RICO in connection with its settlement with the HarbourVest Entities. The Movants brought this complaint despite CLOH having objected 

to the HarbourVest settlement; never raised this issue; and withdrawn its objection. The Debtor believes the complaint is frivolous and represents a collateral attack on the order approving the HarbourVest settlement. The Debtor will take all appropriate actions.

On May 19, the Debtor filed amotion to enforce the order of reference seeking to have the case referred to the Bankruptcy Court [D.I. 22]. On May 27, 2019, the Debtor filed a motion to dismiss the complaint [D.I. 26]. Briefing was completed

for both motions. After briefing was completed, CLOH and the DAF filed a motion seeking tostay the proceeding pending resolution of the appeal of the confirmation order [D.I. 55] and the Debtor filed a responsive brief.

the Court entered an order enforcing the reference onSeptember 20, 2021 [D.I. 64],a and this 

matter is proceedingin the Bankruptcy Court.

CLOH

4/19/21 Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint in the District Court 

Movants: DAF Movants filed a motion seeking leave from this Court to 

add Seery as a defendant and to seek, in this Court, a reconsideration of two final Bankruptcy Court orders. 

This Court denied the motion but with leave to refile. 

N/A

CLOH

Appx. 0013

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 13 of 15 PageID 67 Exhibit 1 Page 13 of 15

000098

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 67 of 235 PageID 160
13

PCMG Trading Partners XXIII, L.P. v. Highland Capital Management, L.P., Case No. 21-cv-01169-N (N.D. Tex. May 21, 2021)4/12/21 Original Complaint

Movants: PCMG 

Trading Partners XXIII, L.P.

Movants allege that the Debtor violated SEC rules andbreached fiduciary duties by causing one of its managed investment vehicles to sell certain assets. The Movant is an entity owned and controlled by Dondero, which had less than a 0.05% interest in the investment vehicle at issue and is no longer an investor. The Debtor believes 

the complaint is frivolous. The Debtor will take all 

appropriate actions.

The Complaint was recently filed and the Debtor has not yet been served. Although the Complaint was not served, the movant filed a motion to stay on August 26, 2021 pending the appeal of the confirmation order [D.I. 6].

N/A

The Dugaboy Investment Trust v. Highland Capital Management, L.P., Case No. 21-cv-01479-S (N.D. Tex. June 23, 2021)6/23/21 Original Complaint

Movants: Dugaboy Dugaboy alleges that the Debtor violated SEC rules and

breached fiduciary duties by causing one of its managed investment vehicles to sell certain assets. Dugaboy is 

Dondero’s family trust with less than a 2% interest in the vehicle. Dugaboy’s allegations in the complaint are duplicative of allegations it made in proofs of claim filed in the Bankruptcy Court.

The Complaint was withdrawn after the Debtor informed the Bankruptcy Court of the filing.

N/A

The Charitable DAF Fund, LP v. Highland Capital Management, L.P., Case No. 21-cv-01710-N (N.D. Tex. July 22, 2021)7/22/21 Original Complaint

Movants: Dugaboy DAF alleges that the Debtor violated SEC rules and

breached fiduciary duties by causing one of its managed investment vehicles to sell certain assets. DAF’s 

allegations in the complaint are duplicative of allegations Dugaboy made in proofs of claim filed in the Bankruptcy Court and in its complaint filed in the Northern District of Texas.

The Complaint was recently filed and the Debtor has not yet been served. Although the Complaint was not served, the movant filed a motion to stay on August 26, 2021 pending the appeal of the confirmation order [D.I. 6].

N/A

Appx. 0014

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 14 of 15 PageID 68 Exhibit 1 Page 14 of 15

000099

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 68 of 235 PageID 161
14

In re James Dondero, Petitioner, Cause No. DC-21-09534 (Tex. July 22, 2021)7/22/21 Original Complaint

Movants: Dondero Dondero seeks pre-suit discovery from Farallon Capital, 

a purchaser of certain claims in this case, and the Crusader Fund. Dondero alleges that Farallon breached certain U.S. Trustee requirements when it purchased those claims. Dondero also alleges that Farallon purchased those claims because of its relationship to Mr. Seery and that Mr. Seery was leveraging his relationship with Farallon to ensure that he remains in control of the Debtor.

Farallon and the Crusader Fund removed this action to the Bankruptcy Court [D.I. 1]. Dondero moved to remand[D.I. 4], which is being opposed.

This matter is currently being litigated.

Appx. 0015

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-1 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 15 of 15 PageID 69 Exhibit 1 Page 15 of 15

000100

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 69 of 235 PageID 162
EXHIBIT 

Appx. 0016

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-2 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID 70

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-2 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 4

000101

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 70 of 235 PageID 163
SUMMARY OF DONDERO AND RELATED ENTITIES MOTIONS TO CONTINUE, STAY, OR ABATE

A

DOCS_NY:44180.1 36027/003

DVERSARY

PROCEEDING TO 

ENJOIN

DONDERO FROM 

INTERFERING WITH 

HIGHLAND’S

BANKRUPTCY

ESTATE AND 

RELATED

CONTEMPT

PROCEEDING1

 Motion Court Movant

Motion to Continue Contempt Hearing, Adv. Proc. No. 21-3190-sgj-11, D.I. 102 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2021) 

Bankruptcy

Court

Dondero

Motion to Continue Further Contempt Hearing, Adv. Proc. No. 21-3190-sgj-11, D.I. 119 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2021)

Bankruptcy

Court

Dondero

Motion for Continuance of Contempt Hearing, Adv. Proc. No. 21-3190-sgj-11 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2021) 

Bankruptcy

Court

Dondero

Defendant’s Emergency Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Defendant’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, Alternatively, Motion to Continue Trial Setting, Adv. Proc. No. 21-3190-sgj-11, D.I. 154 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Apr. 30, 2021)

Bankruptcy

Court

Dondero

Motion to Stay Permanent Injunction Proceedings Pending Resolution of Mandamus, Case No. 21-10219 (5th Cir. May 6, 2021) 

Fifth Circuit Dondero 

Defendant’s Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and for Approval of Supersedeas Bond or Other Security, Adv. Proc. No. 21-3190-sgj-11, D.I. 196 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. June 15, 2021)

Bankruptcy

Court

Dondero

ADVERSARY

PROCEEDING TO 

COLLECT ON 

CERTAIN

DEMAND AND 

TERM

NOTES

ISSUED TO 

DONDERO AND 

HIS

RELATED

ENTITIES

 Motion Court Movant

Defendant James Dondero’s Emergency Motion to Continue Docket Call and Trial and/or Amend Scheduling Order, Adv. Proc. No. 21-03003-sgj-11, D.I.8 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2021)

Bankruptcy

Court

Dondero

1 This chart excludes the seven motions filed in the Bankruptcy Court, the District Court, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by the Dondero Entities to stay the 

effective date of the Confirmation Order pending appeal. 

Appx. 0017

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-2 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID 71

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-2 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 4

000102

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 71 of 235 PageID 164
SUMMARY OF DONDERO AND RELATED ENTITIES MOTIONS TO CONTINUE, STAY, OR ABATE

DOCS_NY:44180.1 36027/003

James Dondero’s Motion to Stay Pending the Motion to Withdraw the Reference of Plaintiff’s Complaint, Adv. Proc. No. 21-03003-sgj-11, D.I. 22 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Apr. 15, 2021) 

Bankruptcy

Court

Dondero

Defendant’s Expedited Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Motion to Withdraw the Reference of Adversary Proceeding, Adv. Proc. No. 21-03006-sgj-11, D.I. 23 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. June 3, 2021) 

Bankruptcy

Court

Highland Capital 

Management Services, 

Inc. 

Defendant’s Expedited Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Motion to Withdraw the Reference of Adversary Proceeding, Adv. Proc. No. 21-03006-sgj-11, D.I. 26 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. June 4, 2021)

Bankruptcy

Court

Highland Capital 

Management Services, 

Inc. 

Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Motion to Withdraw the Reference of Adversary Proceeding, Adv. Proc. No. 21-03007-sgj-11, D.I. 24 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. June 3, 2021)

Bankruptcy

Court

HCRE Partners, LLC 

(n/k/a NexPoint Real 

Estate Partners, LLC) 

Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Motion to Withdraw the Reference of Adversary Proceeding, Adv. Proc. No. 21-03007-sgj-11, D.I. 27 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. June 3, 2021) 

Bankruptcy

Court

HCRE Partners, LLC 

(n/k/a NexPoint Real 

Estate Partners, LLC) 

CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDING OF 

HIGHLAND

CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT, L.P.

 Motion Court Movant

Motion to Continue Hearing on Debtor’s Third Omnibus Objection to Certain No Liability Claims, Case No. 19-34054-sgj-11, D.I. 2226 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2021)

Bankruptcy

Court

CPCM, LLC2

2 CPCM, LLC, is an entity created, on information and belief, by Scott Ellington and James Dondero to purchase the claims of former Highland employees in order 

to litigate those claims against Highland. 

Appx. 0018

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-2 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID 72

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-2 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 4

000103

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 72 of 235 PageID 165
SUMMARY OF DONDERO AND RELATED ENTITIES MOTIONS TO CONTINUE, STAY, OR ABATE

D

DOCS_NY:44180.1 36027/003

ISTRICT

COURT

PROCEEDINGS

FILED BY 

APPELLANTS AND 

OTHER

DONDERO

RELATED

ENTITIES TO 

SUE

HIGHLAND FOR 

ALLEGED

MISMANAGEMENT OF 

ITS

ESTATE

DURING ITS 

BANKRUPTCY

 Motion Court Movant

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay All Proceedings, Case No. 3:21-cv-01710-N, D.I. 6 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2021)

District Court DAF 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay All Proceedings, Case No. 3:21-cv-00842-B, D.I. 55 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2021) 

District Court Appellants 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay All Proceedings, Case No. 3:21-cv-01169-N, D.I. 6 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2021) 

District Court PCMG Trading Partners 

XXIII, L.P.3

Appellants’ Opposed Motion to Stay or Abate Appeal, Case No. 3:21-cv-01585-S, D.I. 10 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2021) 

District Court Appellants 

Partially Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Opening Brief, Case No. 3:21-cv-01585-S, D.I. 13 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2021) 

District Court Appellants 

3 PCMG Trading Partners XXIII, L.P., is an entity majority owned indirectly by Dondero which was used to invest in certain investment vehicles managed by 

Highland. 

Appx. 0019

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-2 Filed 10/05/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID 73

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-2 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 2 Page 4 of 4

000104

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 73 of 235 PageID 166
EXHIBIT 

Appx. 0020

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 162 PageID 74

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 1 of 162

000105

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 74 of 235 PageID 167
DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.,1

Debtor. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Chapter 11 

Case No. 19-34054-sgj11 

ORDER (I) CONFIRMING THE FIFTH AMENDED 

PLAN OF REORGANIZATION OF HIGHLAND CAPITAL 

MANAGEMENT, L.P. (AS MODIFIED) AND (II) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF 

The Bankruptcy Court2

 having: 

a. entered, on November 24, 2020, the Order (A) Approving the Adequacy of the 

Disclosure Statement, (B) Scheduling A Hearing to Confirm the Fifth Amended 

Plan of Reorganization (C) Establishing Deadline for Filing Objections to 

Confirmation of Plan, (D) Approving Form of Ballots, Voting Deadline and 

Solicitation Procedures, and (E) Approving Form and Manner of Notice [Docket 

No. 1476] (the “Disclosure Statement Order”), pursuant to which the Bankruptcy 

Court approved the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement Relating to the Fifth 

1

 The Debtor’s last four digits of its taxpayer identification number are (6725). The headquarters and service address 

for the above-captioned Debtor is 300 Crescent Court, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75201. 

2

 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Plan (as defined 

below). The rules of interpretation set forth in Article I of the Plan apply to this Confirmation Order. 

______________________________________________________________________

Signed February 22, 2021

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 1 of 161

Appx. 0021

 ̈1¤}HV5"6 2R«

1934054210222000000000018

Docket #1943 Date Filed: 02/22/2021

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 162 PageID 75

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 2 of 162

000106

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 75 of 235 PageID 168
 2 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. [Docket 

No. 1473] (the “Disclosure Statement”) under section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code 

and authorized solicitation of the Disclosure Statement; 

b. set January 5, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. prevailing Central Time (the “Objection 

Deadline”), as the deadline for filing objections to confirmation of the Fifth 

Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. (As 

Modified) [Docket No. 1808] (as amended, supplemented or modified, the “Plan”); 

c. set January 5, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. prevailing Central Time, as the deadline for voting 

on the Plan (the “Voting Deadline”) in accordance with the Disclosure Statement 

Order; 

d. initially set January 13, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. prevailing Central Time, as the date and 

time to commence the hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan pursuant to 

Bankruptcy Rules 3017 and 3018, sections 1126, 1128, and 1129 of the Bankruptcy 

Code, and the Disclosure Statement Order, which hearing was continued to January 

26, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. prevailing Central Time and further continued to February 2, 

2021; 

e. reviewed: (i) the Plan; (ii) the Disclosure Statement; and (iii) Notice of (I) Entry of 

Order Approving Disclosure Statement; (II) Hearing to Confirm; and (III) Related 

Important Dates (the “Confirmation Hearing Notice”), the form of which is 

attached as Exhibit 1-B to the Disclosure Statement Order; 

f. reviewed: (i) the Debtor’s Notice of Filing of Plan Supplement for the Third 

Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. [Docket 

No. 1389] filed November 13, 2020; (ii) Debtor’s Notice of Filing of Plan 

Supplement for the Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. [Docket No. 1606] filed on December 18, 2020; (iii) the 

Debtor’s Notice of Filing of Plan Supplement for the Fifth Amended Plan of 

Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. [Docket No. 1656] filed on 

January 4, 2021; (iv) Notice of Filing Plan Supplement to the Fifth Amended Plan 

of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. (with Technical 

Modifications)t dated January 22, 2021 [Docket No. 1811]; and (v) Debtor’s Notice 

of Filing of Plan Supplement to the Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of 

Highland of Highland Capital Management, L.P. (As Modified) on February 1, 

2021 [Docket No. 1875]; (collectively, the documents listed in (i) through (v) of 

this paragraph, the “Plan Supplements”); 

g. reviewed: (i) the Notice of (I) Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases to be 

Assumed by the Debtor Pursuant to the Fifth Amended Plan, (II) Cure Amounts, if 

Any, and (III) Related Procedures in Connection Therewith filed on December 30, 

2020 [Docket No. 1648]; (ii) the Second Notice of (I) Executory Contracts and 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 2 of 161

Appx. 0022

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 162 PageID 76

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 3 of 162

000107

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 76 of 235 PageID 169
 3 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Unexpired Leases to be Assumed by the Debtor Pursuant to the Fifth Amended 

Plan, (II) Cure Amounts, if Any, and (III) Related Procedures in Connection 

Therewith filed on January 11, 2021 [Docket No.1719]; (iii) the Third Notice of 

(I) Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases to be Assumed by the Debtor 

Pursuant to the Fifth Amended Plan, (II) Cure Amounts, if Any, and (III) Related 

Procedures in Connection Therewith filed on January 15, 2021 [Docket No. 1749]; 

(iv) the Notice of Withdrawal of Certain Executory Contracts and Unexpired 

Leases from List of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases to be Assumed by 

the Debtor Pursuant to the Fifth Amended Plan [Docket No. 1791]; (v) the Fourth 

Notice of (I) Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases to be Assumed by the 

Debtor Pursuant to the Fifth Amended Plan (II) Cure Amounts, if Any, and (III) 

Released Procedures in Connection Therewith filed on January 27, 2021 [Docket 

No. 1847]; (vi) the Notice of Hearing on Agreed Motion to (I) Assume 

Nonresidential Real Property Lease with Crescent TC Investors, L.P. Upon 

Confirmation of Plan and (II) Extend Assumption Deadline filed on January 28, 

2021 [Docket No. 1857]; and (vii) the Fifth Notice of (I) Executory Contracts and 

Unexpired Leases to be Assumed by the Debtor Pursuant to the Fifth Amended Plan 

(II) Cure Amounts, if Any, and (III) Released Procedures in Connection Therewith

filed on February 1, 2021 [Docket No. 1873] (collectively, the documents referred 

to in (i) to (vii) are referred to as “List of Assumed Contracts”); 

h. reviewed: (i) the Debtor’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Confirmation of the 

Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

[Docket No. 1814] (the “Confirmation Brief”); (ii) the Debtor’s Omnibus Reply to 

Objections to Confirmation of the Fifth Amended Chapter 11 Plan of 

Reorganization of Highland Capital Management; [Docket No. 1807]; and (iii) the 

Certification of Patrick M. Leathem With Respect to the Tabulation of Votes on the 

Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P.

[Docket No. 1772] and Supplemental Certification of Patrick M. Leathem With 

Respect to the Tabulation of Votes on the Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. [Docket No. 1887] filed on February 3, 2021 

(together, the “Voting Certifications”). 

i. reviewed: (i) the Notice of Affidavit of Publication dated December 3, 2020 [Docket 

No. 1505]; (ii) the Certificate of Service dated December 23, 2020 [Docket No. 

1630]; (iii) the Supplemental Certificate of Service dated December 24, 2020 

[Docket No. 1637]; (iv) the Second Supplemental Certificate of Service dated 

December 31, 2020 [Docket No. 1653]; (v) the Certificate of Service dated 

December 23, 2020 [Docket No. 1627]; (vi) the Certificate of Service dated January 

6, 2021 [Docket No. 1696]; (vii) the Certificate of Service dated January 7, 2021 

[Docket No. 1699]; (viii) the Certificate of Service dated January 7, 2021 [Docket 

No 1700]; (ix) the Certificate of Service dated January 15, 2021 [Docket No. 1761]; 

(x) the Certificate of Service dated January 19, 2021 [Docket No. 1775]; (xi) the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 3 of 161

Appx. 0023

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 4 of 162 PageID 77

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 4 of 162

000108

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 77 of 235 PageID 170
 4 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Certificate of Service dated January 20, 2021 [Docket No. 1787]; (xii) the 

Certificate of Service dated January 26, 2021[Docket No. 1844]; (xiii) the 

Certificate of Service dated January 27, 2021 [Docket No. 1854]; (xiv) the 

Certificate of Service dated February 1, 2021 [Docket No. 1879]; (xv) the 

Certificates of Service dated February 3, 2021 [Docket No. 1891 and 1893]; and 

(xvi) the Certificates of Service dated February 5, 2021 [Docket Nos. 1906, 1907, 

1908 and 1909] (collectively, the “Affidavits of Service and Publication”); 

j. reviewed all filed3 pleadings, exhibits, statements, and comments regarding 

approval of the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan, including all 

objections, statements, and reservations of rights; 

k. conducted a hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan, which commenced on 

February 2, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. prevailing Central Time and concluded on February 

3, 2021, and issued its oral ruling on February 8, 2021 (collectively, the 

“Confirmation Hearing); 

l. heard the statements and arguments made by counsel in respect of confirmation of 

the Plan and having considered the record of this Chapter 11 Case and taken judicial 

notice of all papers and pleadings filed in this Chapter 11 Case; and 

m. considered all oral representations, testimony, documents, filings, and other 

evidence regarding confirmation of the Plan, including (a) all of the exhibits 

admitted into evidence;4

 (b) the sworn testimony of (i) James P. Seery, Jr., the 

Debtor’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer and a member of 

the Board of Directors of Strand Advisors, Inc. (“Strand”), the Debtor’s general 

partner; (ii) John S. Dubel, a member of the Board of Strand; (iii) Marc Tauber, a 

Vice President at Aon Financial Services; and (iv) Robert Jason Post, the Chief 

Compliance Officer of NexPoint Advisors, LP (collectively, the “Witnesses”); (c) 

the credibility of the Witnesses; and (d) the Voting Certifications. 

NOW, THEREFORE, after due deliberation thereon and good cause appearing therefor, 

the Bankruptcy Court hereby makes and issues the following findings of fact and conclusions of 

law: 

3

 Unless otherwise indicated, use of the term “filed” herein refers also to the service of the applicable document filed 

on the docket in this Chapter 11 Case, as applicable. 

4

 The Court admitted the following exhibits into evidence: (a) all of the Debtor’s exhibits lodged at Docket No. 1822 

(except TTTTT, which was withdrawn by the Debtor); (b) all of the Debtor’s exhibits lodged at Docket No. 1866; (c) 

all of the Debtor’s exhibits lodged at Docket No. 1877; (d) all of the Debtor’s exhibits lodged at Docket No. 1895; 

and (e) Exhibits 6-12 and 15-17 offered by Mr. James Dondero and lodged at Docket No. 1874. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 4 of 161

Appx. 0024

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 5 of 162 PageID 78

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 5 of 162

000109

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 78 of 235 PageID 171
 5 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

1. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The findings and conclusions 

set forth herein, together with the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the record 

during the Confirmation Hearing, constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s findings of fact and 

conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, made applicable to this 

proceeding pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 7052 and 9014. To the extent any of the following 

findings of fact constitute conclusions of law, they are adopted as such. To the extent that any of 

the following conclusions of law constitute findings of fact, they are adopted as such. 

2. Introduction and Summary of the Plan. Prior to addressing the specific 

requirements under the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules with respect to the confirmation 

of the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court believes it would be useful to first provide the following 

background of the Debtor’s Chapter 11 Case, the parties involved therewith, and some of the major 

events that have transpired culminating in the filing and solicitation of the Plan of this very unusual 

case. Before the Bankruptcy Court is the Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of 

Highland Capital Management, L.P., filed on November 24, 2020, as modified on January 22, 

2021 and again on February 1, 2021. The parties have repeatedly referred to the Plan as an “asset 

monetization plan” because it involves the orderly wind-down of the Debtor’s estate, including the 

sale of assets and certain of its funds over time, with the Reorganized Debtor continuing to manage 

certain other funds, subject to the oversight of the Claimant Trust Oversight Board. The Plan 

provides for a Claimant Trust to, among other things, manage and monetize the Claimant Trust 

Assets for the benefit of the Debtor’s economic stakeholders. The Claimant Trustee is responsible 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 5 of 161

Appx. 0025

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 6 of 162 PageID 79

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 6 of 162

000110

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 79 of 235 PageID 172
 6 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

for this process, among other duties specified in the Plan’s Claimant Trust Agreement. There is 

also anticipated to be a Litigation Sub-trust established for the purpose of pursuing certain 

avoidance or other causes of action for the benefit of the Debtor’s economic constituents. 

3. Confirmation Requirements Satisfied. The Plan is supported by the 

Committee and all claimants with Convenience Claims (i.e., general unsecured claims under $1 

million) who voted in Class 7. Claimants with Class 8 General Unsecured Claims, however, voted 

to reject the Plan because, although the Plan was accepted by 99.8% of the amount of Claims in 

that class, only 17 claimants voted to accept the Plan while 27 claimants voted to reject the Plan. 

As a result of such votes, and because Mr. Dondero and the Dondero Related Entities (as defined 

below) objected to the Plan on a variety of grounds primarily relating to the Plan’s release, 

exculpation and injunction provisions, the Bankruptcy Court heard two full days of evidence on 

February 2 and 3, 2021, and considered testimony from five witnesses and thousands of pages of 

documentary evidence in determining whether the Plan satisfies the confirmation standards 

required under the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court finds and concludes that the Plan 

meets all of the relevant requirements of sections 1123, 1124, and 1129, and other applicable 

provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, as more fully set forth below with respect to each of the 

applicable confirmation requirements. 

4. Not Your Garden Variety Debtor. The Debtor’s case is not a garden 

variety chapter 11 case. The Debtor is a multibillion-dollar global investment adviser registered 

with the SEC, pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It was founded in 1993 by James 

Dondero and Mark Okada. Mark Okada resigned from his role with Highland prior to the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 6 of 161

Appx. 0026

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 7 of 162 PageID 80

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 7 of 162

000111

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 80 of 235 PageID 173
 7 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

bankruptcy case being filed on October 16, 2019 (the “Petition Date”). Mr. Dondero controlled 

the Debtor as of the Petition Date but agreed to relinquish control of it on or about January 9, 2020, 

pursuant to an agreement reached with the Committee, as described below. Although Mr. Dondero 

remained with the Debtor as an unpaid employee/portfolio manager after January 9, 2020, his 

employment with the Debtor terminated on October 9, 2020. Mr. Dondero continues to work for 

and/or control numerous non-debtor entities in the complex Highland enterprise. 

5. The Debtor. The Debtor is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. As of the 

Petition Date, the Debtor employed approximately 76 employees. The Debtor is privately-owned: 

(a) 99.5% by the Hunter Mountain Investment Trust; (b) 0.1866% by The Dugaboy Investment 

Trust, a trust created to manage the assets of Mr. Dondero and his family; (c) 0.0627% by Mark 

Okada, personally and through family trusts; and (d) 0.25% by Strand, the Debtor’s general 

partner. 

6. The Highland Enterprise. Pursuant to various contractual arrangements, 

the Debtor provides money management and advisory services for billions of dollars of assets, 

including collateralized loan obligation vehicles (“CLOs”), and other investments. Some of these 

assets are managed by the Debtor pursuant to shared services agreements with certain affiliated 

entities, including other affiliated registered investment advisors. In fact, there are approximately 

2,000 entities in the byzantine complex of entities under the Highland umbrella. None of these 

affiliated entities filed for chapter 11 protection. Most, but not all, of these entities are not 

subsidiaries (direct or indirect) of the Debtor. Many of the Debtor’s affiliated companies are 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 7 of 161

Appx. 0027

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 8 of 162 PageID 81

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 8 of 162

000112

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 81 of 235 PageID 174
 8 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

offshore entities, organized in jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands and Guernsey. See 

Disclosure Statement, at 17-18. 

7. Debtor’s Operational History. The Debtor’s primary means of generating 

revenue has historically been from fees collected for the management and advisory services 

provided to funds that it manages, plus fees generated for services provided to its affiliates. For 

additional liquidity, the Debtor, prior to the Petition Date, would sell liquid securities in the 

ordinary course, primarily through a brokerage account at Jefferies, LLC. The Debtor would also, 

from time to time, sell assets at non-Debtor subsidiaries and cause those proceeds to be distributed 

to the Debtor in the ordinary course of business. The Debtor’s current Chief Executive Officer, 

James P. Seery, Jr., credibly testified at the Confirmation Hearing that the Debtor was “run at a 

deficit for a long time and then would sell assets or defer employee compensation to cover its 

deficits.” The Bankruptcy Court cannot help but wonder if that was necessitated because of 

enormous litigation fees and expenses incurred by the Debtor due to its culture of litigation—as 

further addressed below. 

8. Not Your Garden Variety Creditor’s Committee. The Debtor and this 

chapter 11 case are not garden variety for so many reasons. One of the most obvious standouts in 

this case is the creditor constituency. The Debtor did not file for bankruptcy because of any of the 

typical reasons that large companies file chapter 11. For example, the Debtor did not have a large, 

asset-based secured lender with whom it was in default; it only had relatively insignificant secured 

indebtedness owing to Jeffries, with whom it had a brokerage account, and one other entity, 

Frontier State Bank. The Debtor also did not have problems with its trade vendors or landlords. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 8 of 161

Appx. 0028

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 9 of 162 PageID 82

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 9 of 162

000113

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 82 of 235 PageID 175
 9 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

The Debtor also did not suffer any type of catastrophic business calamity. In fact, the Debtor filed 

for Chapter 11 protection six months before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rather, the 

Debtor filed for Chapter 11 protection due to a myriad of massive, unrelated, business litigation 

claims that it faced—many of which had finally become liquidated (or were about to become 

liquidated) after a decade or more of contentious litigation in multiple forums all over the world. 

The Committee in this case has referred to the Debtor—under its former chief executive, Mr. 

Dondero—as a “serial litigator.” The Bankruptcy Court agrees with that description. By way of 

example, the members of the Committee (and their history of litigation with the Debtor and others 

in the Highland complex) are as follows: 

a. The Redeemer Committee of the Highland Crusader Fund (the “Redeemer 

Committee”). This Committee member obtained an arbitration award against the 

Debtor in the amount of $190,824,557, inclusive of interest, approximately five 

months before the Petition Date, from a panel of the American Arbitration 

Association. It was on the verge of having that award confirmed by the Delaware 

Chancery Court immediately prior to the Petition Date, after years of disputes that 

started in late 2008 (and included legal proceedings in Bermuda). This creditor’s 

claim was settled during this Chapter 11 Case in the amount of approximately 

$137,696,610 (subject to other adjustments and details not relevant for this 

purpose). 

b. Acis Capital Management, L.P., and Acis Capital Management GP, LLC 

(“Acis”). Acis was formerly in the Highland complex of companies, but was not 

affiliated with Highland as of the Petition Date. This Committee member and its 

now-owner, Joshua Terry, were involved in litigation with the Debtor dating back 

to 2016. Acis was forced by Mr. Terry (who was a former Highland portfolio 

manager) into an involuntary chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Bankruptcy Court for 

the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division before the Bankruptcy Court in 

2018, after Mr. Terry obtained an approximately $8 million arbitration award and 

judgment against Acis. Mr. Terry ultimately was awarded the equity ownership of 

Acis by the Bankruptcy Court in the Acis bankruptcy case. Acis subsequently 

asserted a multi-million dollar claim against Highland in the Bankruptcy Court for 

Highland’s alleged denuding of Acis to defraud its creditors—primarily Mr. Terry. 

The litigation involving Acis and Mr. Terry dates back to mid-2016 and has 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 9 of 161

Appx. 0029

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 10 of 162 PageID 83

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 10 of 162

000114

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 83 of 235 PageID 176
 10 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

continued on with numerous appeals of Bankruptcy Court orders, including one 

appeal still pending at the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. There was also litigation 

involving Mr. Terry and Acis in the Royal Court of the Island of Guernsey and in 

a state court in New York. The Acis claim was settled during this Chapter 11 Case, 

in Bankruptcy Court-ordered mediation, for approximately $23 million (subject to 

other details not relevant for this purpose), and is the subject of an appeal being 

pursued by Mr. Dondero. 

c. UBS Securities LLC and UBS AG London Branch (“UBS”). UBS is a 

Committee member that filed a proof of claim in the amount of $1,039,957,799.40 

in this Chapter 11 Case. The UBS Claim was based on a judgment that UBS 

received from a New York state court in 2020. The underlying decision was issued 

in November 2019, after a multi-week bench trial (which had occurred many 

months earlier) on a breach of contract claim against non-Debtor entities in the 

Highland complex. The UBS litigation related to activities that occurred in 2008 

and 2009. The litigation involving UBS and Highland and affiliates was pending 

for more than a decade (there having been numerous interlocutory appeals during 

its history). The Debtor and UBS recently announced an agreement in principle for 

a settlement of the UBS claim (which came a few months after Bankruptcy Courtordered mediation) which will be subject to a 9019 motion to be filed with the 

Bankruptcy Court on a future date. 

d. Meta-E Discovery (“Meta-E”). Meta-E is a Committee member that is a vendor 

who happened to supply litigation and discovery-related services to the Debtor over 

the years. It had unpaid invoices on the Petition Date of more than $779,000. 

It is fair to say that the members of the Committee in this case all have wills of steel. They fought 

hard before and during this Chapter 11 Case. The members of the Committee, all of whom have 

volunteered to serve on the Claimant Trust Oversight Board post-confirmation, are highly 

sophisticated and have had highly sophisticated professionals representing them. They have 

represented their constituency in this case as fiduciaries extremely well. 

9. Other Key Creditor Constituents. In addition to the Committee members 

who were all embroiled in years of litigation with Debtor and its affiliates in various ways, the 

Debtor has been in litigation with Patrick Daugherty, a former limited partner and employee of the 

Debtor, for many years in both Delaware and Texas state courts. Mr. Daugherty filed an amended 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 10 of 161

Appx. 0030

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 11 of 162 PageID 84

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 11 of 162

000115

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 84 of 235 PageID 177
 11 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

proof of claim in this Chapter 11 Case for $40,710,819.42 relating to alleged breaches of 

employment-related agreements and for defamation arising from a 2017 press release posted by 

the Debtor. The Debtor and Mr. Daugherty recently announced a settlement of Mr. Daugherty’s 

claim pursuant to which he will receive $750,000 in cash on the Effective Date of the Plan, an 

$8.25 million general unsecured claim, and a $2.75 million subordinated claim (subject to other 

details not relevant for this purpose). Additionally, entities collectively known as “HarbourVest” 

invested more than $70 million with an entity in the Highland complex and asserted a $300 million 

proof of claim against the Debtor in this case, alleging, among other things, fraud and RICO 

violations. HarbourVest’s claim was settled during the bankruptcy case for a $45 million general 

unsecured claim and a $35 million subordinated claim, and that settlement is also being appealed 

by a Dondero Entity. 

10. Other Claims Asserted. Other than the Claims just described, most of the 

other Claims in this Chapter 11 Case are Claims asserted against the Debtor by: (a) entities in the 

Highland complex—most of which entities the Bankruptcy Court finds to be controlled by Mr. 

Dondero; (b) employees who contend that are entitled to large bonuses or other types of deferred 

compensation; and (c) numerous law firms that worked for the Debtor prior to the Petition Date 

and had outstanding amounts due for their prepetition services.

11. Not Your Garden Variety Post-Petition Corporate Governance 

Structure. Yet another reason this is not your garden variety chapter 11 case is its post-petition 

corporate governance structure. Immediately from its appointment, the Committee’s relationship 

with the Debtor was contentious at best. First, the Committee moved for a change of venue from 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 11 of 161

Appx. 0031

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 12 of 162 PageID 85

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 12 of 162

000116

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 85 of 235 PageID 178
 12 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Delaware to Dallas. Second, the Committee (and later, the United States Trustee) expressed its 

then-desire for the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee due to its concerns over and distrust of Mr. 

Dondero, his numerous conflicts of interest, and his history of alleged mismanagement (and 

perhaps worse). 

12. Post-Petition Corporate Governance Settlement with Committee. After 

spending many weeks under the threat of the potential appointment of a trustee, the Debtor and 

Committee engaged in substantial and lengthy negotiations resulting in a corporate governance 

settlement approved by the Bankruptcy Court on January 9, 2020.5

 As a result of this settlement, 

among other things, Mr. Dondero relinquished control of the Debtor and resigned his positions as 

an officer or director of the Debtor and its general partner, Strand. As noted above, Mr. Dondero 

agreed to this settlement pursuant a stipulation he executed,6

 and he also agreed not to cause any 

Related Entity (as defined in the Settlement Motion) to terminate any agreements with the Debtor. 

The January 9 Order also (a) required that the Bankruptcy Court serve as “gatekeeper” prior to the 

commencement of any litigation against the three independent board members appointed to 

oversee and lead the Debtor’s restructuring in lieu of Mr. Dondero and (b) provided for the 

exculpation of those board members by limiting claims subject to the “gatekeeper” provision to 

those alleging willful misconduct and gross negligence. 

5

 This order is hereinafter referred to as the “January 9 Order” and was entered by the Court on January 9, 2020 

[Docket No. 339] pursuant to the Motion of the Debtor to Approve Settlement with Official Committee of Unsecured 

Creditors Regarding the Governance of the Debtor and Procedures for Operation in the Ordinary Course [Docket 

No. 281] (the “Settlement Motion”). 

6 See Stipulation in Support of Motion of the Debtor for Approval of Settlement With the Official Committee of 

Unsecured Creditors Regarding Governance of the Debtor and Procedures for Operations in Ordinary Course

[Docket No. 338] (the “Stipulation”). 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 12 of 161

Appx. 0032

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 13 of 162 PageID 86

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 13 of 162

000117

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 86 of 235 PageID 179
 13 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

13. Appointment of Independent Directors. As part of the Bankruptcy 

Court-approved settlement, three eminently qualified independent directors were chosen to lead 

Highland through its Chapter 11 Case. They are: James P. Seery, Jr., John S. Dubel (each chosen 

by the Committee), and Retired Bankruptcy Judge Russell Nelms. These three individuals are 

each technically independent directors of Strand (Mr. Dondero had previously been the sole 

director of Strand and, thus, the sole person in ultimate control of the Debtor). The three 

independent board members’ resumes are in evidence. The Bankruptcy Court later approved Mr. 

Seery’s appointment as the Debtor’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Restructuring Officer, and 

Foreign Representative. Suffice it to say that this settlement and the appointment of the 

independent directors changed the entire trajectory of the case and saved the Debtor from the 

appointment of a trustee. The Bankruptcy Court and the Committee each trusted the independent 

directors. They were the right solution at the right time. Because of the unique character of the 

Debtor’s business, the Bankruptcy Court believed the appointment of three qualified independent 

directors was a far better outcome for creditors than the appointment of a conventional chapter 11 

trustee. Each of the independent directors brought unique qualities to the table. Mr. Seery, in 

particular, knew and had vast experience at prominent firms with high-yield and distressed 

investing similar to the Debtor’s business. Mr. Dubel had 40 years of experience restructuring 

large complex businesses and serving on boards in this context. And Retired Judge Nelms had not 

only vast bankruptcy experience but seemed particularly well-suited to help the Debtor maneuver 

through conflicts and ethical quandaries. By way of comparison, in the chapter 11 case of Acis, 

the former affiliate of Highland that the Bankruptcy Court presided over and which company was 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 13 of 161

Appx. 0033

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 14 of 162 PageID 87

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 14 of 162

000118

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 87 of 235 PageID 180
 14 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

much smaller in size and scope than Highland (managing only 5-6 CLOs), the creditors elected a 

chapter 11 trustee who was not on the normal trustee rotation panel in this district but, rather, was 

a nationally known bankruptcy attorney with more than 45 years of large chapter 11 experience. 

While the Acis chapter 11 trustee performed valiantly, he was sued by entities in the Highland 

complex shortly after he was appointed (which the Bankruptcy Court had to address). The Acis 

trustee was also unable to persuade the Debtor and its affiliates to agree to any actions taken in the 

case, and he finally obtained confirmation of Acis’ chapter 11 plan over the objections of the 

Debtor and its affiliates on his fourth attempt (which confirmation was promptly appealed). 

14. Conditions Required by Independent Directors. Given the experiences 

in Acis and the Debtor’s culture of constant litigation, it was not as easy to get such highly qualified 

persons to serve as independent board members and, later, as the Debtor’s Chief Executive Officer, 

as it would be in an ordinary chapter 11 case. The independent board members were stepping into 

a morass of problems. Naturally, they were worried about getting sued no matter how defensible 

their efforts—given the litigation culture that enveloped Highland historically. Based on the 

record of this Case and the proceedings in the Acis chapter 11 case, it seemed as though everything 

always ended in litigation at Highland. The Bankruptcy Court heard credible testimony that none 

of the independent directors would have taken on the role of independent director without (1) an 

adequate directors and officers’ (“D&O”) insurance policy protecting them; (2) indemnification 

from Strand that would be guaranteed by the Debtor; (3) exculpation for mere negligence claims; 

and (4) a gatekeeper provision prohibiting the commencement of litigation against the independent 

directors without the Bankruptcy Court’s prior authority. This gatekeeper provision was also 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 14 of 161

Appx. 0034

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 15 of 162 PageID 88

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 15 of 162

000119

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 88 of 235 PageID 181
 15 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

included in the Bankruptcy Court’s order authorizing the appointment of Mr. Seery as the Debtor’s 

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Restructuring Officer, and Foreign Representative entered on 

July 16, 2020.7

 The gatekeeper provisions in both the January 9 Order and July 16 Order are 

precisely analogous to what bankruptcy trustees have pursuant to the so-called “Barton Doctrine” 

(first articulated in an old Supreme Court case captioned Barton v. Barbour, 104 U.S. 126 (1881)). 

The Bankruptcy Court approved all of these protections in the January 9 Order and the July 16 

Order, and no one appealed either of those orders. As noted above, Mr. Dondero signed the 

Stipulation that led to the settlement that was approved by the January 9 Order. The Bankruptcy 

Court finds that, like the Committee, the independent board members have been resilient and 

unwavering in their efforts to get the enormous problems in this case solved. They seem to have 

at all times negotiated hard and in good faith, which culminated in the proposal of the Plan 

currently before the Bankruptcy Court. As noted previously, they completely changed the 

trajectory of this case. 

15. Not Your Garden Variety Mediators. And still another reason why this 

was not your garden variety case was the mediation effort. In the summer of 2020, roughly nine 

months into the chapter 11 case, the Bankruptcy Court ordered mediation among the Debtor, Acis, 

UBS, the Redeemer Committee, and Mr. Dondero. The Bankruptcy Court selected co-mediators 

because mediation among these parties seemed like such a Herculean task—especially during 

COVID-19 where people could not all be in the same room. Those co-mediators were: Retired 

7 See Order Approving the Debtor’s Motion Under Bankruptcy Code Sections 105(a) and 363(b) Authorizing 

Retention of James P. Seery, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Restructuring Officer, and Foreign Representative 

Nunc Pro Tunc to March 15, 2020 [Docket No. 854] entered on July 16, 2020 (the “July 16 Order”) 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 15 of 161

Appx. 0035

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 16 of 162 PageID 89

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 16 of 162

000120

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 89 of 235 PageID 182
 16 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Bankruptcy Judge Alan Gropper from the Southern District of New York, who had a distinguished 

career presiding over complex chapter 11 cases, and Ms. Sylvia Mayer, who likewise has had a 

distinguished career, first as a partner at a preeminent law firm working on complex chapter 11 

cases, and subsequently as a mediator and arbitrator in Houston, Texas. As noted earlier, the 

Redeemer Committee and Acis claims were settled during the mediation—which seemed nothing 

short of a miracle to the Bankruptcy Court—and the UBS claim was settled several months later 

and the Bankruptcy Court believes the ground work for that ultimate settlement was laid, or at 

least helped, through the mediation. And, as earlier noted, other significant claims have been 

settled during this case, including those of HarbourVest (who asserted a $300 million claim) and 

Patrick Daugherty (who asserted a $40 million claim). The Bankruptcy Court cannot stress 

strongly enough that the resolution of these enormous claims—and the acceptance by all of these 

creditors of the Plan that is now before the Bankruptcy Court—seems nothing short of a miracle. 

It was more than a year in the making. 

16. Not Your Garden Variety Plan Objectors (That Is, Those That 

Remain). Finally, a word about the current, remaining objectors to the Plan before the Bankruptcy 

Court. Once again, the Bankruptcy Court will use the phrase “not your garden variety”, which 

phrase applies to this case for many reasons. Originally, there were over a dozen objections filed 

to the Plan. The Debtor then made certain amendments or modifications to the Plan to address 

some of these objections, none of which require further solicitation of the Plan for reasons set forth 

in more detail below. The only objectors to the Plan left at the time of the Confirmation Hearing 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 16 of 161

Appx. 0036

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 17 of 162 PageID 90

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 17 of 162

000121

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 90 of 235 PageID 183
 17 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

were Mr. Dondero [Docket No. 1661] and entities that the Bankruptcy Court finds are owned 

and/or controlled by him and that filed the following objections: 

a. Objection to Confirmation of the Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization

(filed by Get Good Trust and The Dugaboy Investment Trust) [Docket No. 1667]; 

b. Objection to Confirmation of Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland 

Capital Management, L.P. (filed by Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, 

L.P., Highland Fixed Income Fund, Highland Funds I and its series, Highland 

Funds II and its series, Highland Global Allocation Fund, Highland Healthcare 

Opportunities Fund, Highland Income Fund, Highland Merger Arbitrate Fund, 

Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund, Highland Small-Cap Equity Fund, Highland 

Socially Responsible Equity Fund, Highland Total Return Fund, Highland/iBoxx 

Senior Loan ETF, NexPoint Advisors, L.P., NexPoint Capital, Inc., NexPoint Real 

Estate Strategies Fund, NexPoint Strategic Opportunities Fund) [Docket No. 

1670]; 

c. A Joinder to the Objection filed at 1670 by: NexPoint Real Estate Finance Inc., 

NexPoint Real Estate Capital, LLC, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc., NexPoint 

Hospitality Trust, NexPoint Real Estate Partners, LLC, NexPoint Multifamily 

Capital Trust, Inc., VineBrook Homes Trust, Inc., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors, 

L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors II, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors III, 

L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors IV, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors V, 

L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors VI, L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors VII, 

L.P., NexPoint Real Estate Advisors VIII, L.P., and any funds advised by the 

foregoing [Docket No. 1677]; 

d. NexPoint Real Estate Partners LLC’s Objection to Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan 

of Reorganization (filed by NexPoint Real Estate Partners LLC f/k/a HCRE 

Partners LLC) [Docket No. 1673]; and 

e. NexBank’s Objection to Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization (filed by 

NexBank Title, Inc., NexBank Securities, Inc., NexBank Capital, Inc., and 

NexBank) [Docket No. 1676]. The entities referred to in (i) through (v) of this 

paragraph are hereinafter referred to as the “Dondero Related Entities”). 

17. Questionability of Good Faith as to Outstanding Confirmation 

Objections. Mr. Dondero and the Dondero Related Entities technically have standing to object to 

the Plan, but the remoteness of their economic interests is noteworthy, and the Bankruptcy Court 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 17 of 161

Appx. 0037

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 18 of 162 PageID 91

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 18 of 162

000122

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 91 of 235 PageID 184
 18 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

questions the good faith of Mr. Dondero’s and the Dondero Related Entities’ objections. In fact, 

the Bankruptcy Court has good reason to believe that these parties are not objecting to protect 

economic interests they have in the Debtor but to be disruptors. Mr. Dondero wants his company 

back. This is understandable, but it is not a good faith basis to lob objections to the Plan. As 

detailed below, the Bankruptcy Court has slowed down plan confirmation multiple times and urged 

the parties to talk to Mr. Dondero in an attempt to arrive at what the parties have repeatedly referred 

to as a “grand bargain,” the ultimate goal to resolve the Debtor’s restructuring. The Debtor and 

the Committee represent that they have communicated with Mr. Dondero regarding a grand 

bargain settlement, and the Bankruptcy Court believes that they have. 

18. Remote Interest of Outstanding Confirmation Objectors. To be specific 

about the remoteness of Mr. Dondero’s and the Dondero Related Entities’ interests, the Bankruptcy 

Court will address them each separately. First, Mr. Dondero has a pending objection to the Plan. 

Mr. Dondero’s only economic interest with regard to the Debtor is an unliquidated indemnification 

claim (and, based on everything the Bankruptcy Court has heard, his indemnification claims would 

be highly questionable at this juncture). Mr. Dondero owns no equity in the Debtor directly. Mr. 

Dondero owns the Debtor’s general partner, Strand, which in turn owns a quarter percent of the 

total equity in the Debtor. Second, a joint objection has been filed by The Dugaboy Trust 

(“Dugaboy”) and the Get Good Trust (“Get Good”). The Dugaboy Trust was created to manage 

the assets of Mr. Dondero and his family and owns a 0.1866% limited partnership interest in the 

Debtor. See Disclosure Statement at 7, n.3. The Bankruptcy Court is not clear what economic 

interest the Get Good Trust has, but it likewise seems to be related to Mr. Dondero. Get Good 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 18 of 161

Appx. 0038

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 19 of 162 PageID 92

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 19 of 162

000123

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 92 of 235 PageID 185
 19 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

filed three proofs of claim relating to a pending federal tax audit of the Debtor’s 2008 return, which 

the Debtor believes arise from Get Good’s equity security interests and are subject to subordination 

as set forth in its Confirmation Brief. Dugaboy filed three claims against the Debtor: (a) an 

administrative claim relating to the Debtor’s alleged postpetition management of Multi-Strat 

Credit Fund, L.P., (b) a prepetition claim against a subsidiary of the Debtor for which it seeks to 

pierce the corporate veil, each of which the Debtor maintains are frivolous in the Confirmation 

Brief, and (c) a claim arising from its equity security interest in the Debtor, which the Debtor 

asserts should be subordinated. Another group of objectors that has joined together in one 

objection is what the Bankruptcy Court will refer to as the “Highland Advisors and Funds.” See

Docket No. 1863. The Bankruptcy Court understands they assert disputed administrative expense 

claims against the estate that were filed shortly before the Confirmation Hearing on January 23, 

2021 [Docket No. 1826], and during the Confirmation Hearing on February 3, 2021 [Docket No. 

1888]. At the Confirmation Hearing, Mr. Post testified on behalf of the Highland Advisors and 

Funds that the Funds have independent board members that run the Funds, but the Bankruptcy 

Court was not convinced of their independence from Mr. Dondero because none of the so-called 

independent board members have ever testified before the Bankruptcy Court and all have been 

engaged with the Highland complex for many years. Notably, the Court questions Mr. Post’s 

credibility because, after more than 12 years of service, he abruptly resigned from the Debtor in 

October 2020 at the exact same time that Mr. Dondero resigned at the Board of Directors’ request, 

and he is currently employed by Mr. Dondero. Moreover, Dustin Norris, a witness in a prior 

proceeding (whose testimony was made part of the record at the Confirmation Hearing), recently 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 19 of 161

Appx. 0039

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 20 of 162 PageID 93

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 20 of 162

000124

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 93 of 235 PageID 186
 20 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

testified on behalf of the Highland Advisors and Funds in another proceeding that Mr. Dondero 

owned and/or controlled these entities. Finally, various NexBank entities objected to the Plan. 

The Bankruptcy Court does not believe they have liquidated claims against the Debtor. Mr. 

Dondero appears to be in control of these entities as well. 

19. Background Regarding Dondero Objecting Parties. To be clear, the 

Bankruptcy Court has allowed all these objectors to fully present arguments and evidence in 

opposition to confirmation, even though their economic interests in the Debtor appear to be 

extremely remote and the Bankruptcy Court questions their good faith. Specifically, the 

Bankruptcy Court considers them all to be marching pursuant to the orders of Mr. Dondero. In 

the recent past, Mr. Dondero has been subject to a temporary restraining order and preliminary 

injunction by the Bankruptcy Court for interfering with Mr. Seery’s management of the Debtor in 

specific ways that were supported by evidence. Around the time that this all came to light and the 

Bankruptcy Court began setting hearings on the alleged interference, Mr. Dondero’s company 

phone, which he had been asked to turn in to Highland, mysteriously went missing. The 

Bankruptcy Court merely mentions this in this context as one of many reasons that the Bankruptcy 

Court has to question the good faith of Mr. Dondero and his affiliates in raising objections to 

confirmation of the Plan. 

20. Other Confirmation Objections. Other than the objections filed by Mr. 

Dondero and the Dondero Related Entities, the only other pending objection to the Plan is the 

United States Trustee’s Limited Objection to Confirmation of Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan of 

Reorganization [Docket No. 1671], which objected to the Plan’s exculpation, injunction, and 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 20 of 161

Appx. 0040

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 21 of 162 PageID 94

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 21 of 162

000125

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 94 of 235 PageID 187
 21 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Debtor release provisions. In juxtaposition, to these pending objections, the Bankruptcy Court 

notes that the Debtor resolved the following objections to the Plan: 

a. CLO Holdco, Ltd.’s Joinder to Objection to Confirmation of Fifth Amended Plan 

of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Supplemental 

Objections to Plan Confirmation [Docket No. 1675]. This Objection has been 

resolved pursuant to mutually agreed language by the parties set forth in paragraph 

VV of the Confirmation Order; 

b. Objection of Dallas County, City of Allen, Allen ISD, City of Richardson, and 

Kaufman County to Confirmation of the Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. [Docket No. 1662]. This Objection has been 

resolved pursuant to mutually agreed language by the parties set forth in paragraph 

QQ of the Confirmation Order; 

c. Senior Employees’ Limited Objection to Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan of 

Reorganization (filed by Scott Ellington, Thomas Surgent, Frank Waterhouse, 

Isaac Leventon) [Docket No. 1669]. This Objection has been resolved pursuant to 

mutually agreed language by the parties set forth in paragraph 82 and paragraphs 

RR and SS of the Confirmation Order; 

d. Limited Objection of Jack Yang and Brad Borud to Fifth Amended Plan of 

Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. [Docket No. 1666] and the 

amended joinder filed by Davis Deadman, Paul Kauffman and Todd Travers 

[Docket No. 1679]. This Objection and the amended joinder were resolved by 

agreement of the parties pursuant to modifications to the Plan filed by the Debtor; 

e. United States’ (IRS) Limited Objection to Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan of 

Reorganization [Docket No. 1668]. This Objection has been resolved pursuant to 

mutually agreed language by the parties set forth in paragraphs TT and UU of the 

Confirmation Order; and 

f. Patrick Hagaman Daugherty’s Objection to Confirmation of Fifth Amended Plan 

of Reorganization [Docket No. 1678]. This objection was resolved by the parties 

pursuant to the settlement of Mr. Daugherty’s claim announced on the record of the 

Confirmation Hearing. 

21. Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used herein, but not defined herein, 

shall have the respective meanings attributed to such terms in the Plan and the Disclosure 

Statement, as applicable. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 21 of 161

Appx. 0041

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 22 of 162 PageID 95

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 22 of 162

000126

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 95 of 235 PageID 188
 22 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

22. Jurisdiction and Venue. The Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction over the 

Debtor’s Chapter 11 Case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This is a core proceeding 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). Venue of this proceeding and this Chapter 11 Case is proper 

in this district and in the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. 

23. Chapter 11 Petition. On the Petition Date, the Debtor commenced a 

voluntary case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court 

for the District of Delaware, which case was transferred to the Bankruptcy Court on December 19, 

2019. The Debtor continues to operate its business and manage its property as debtor in possession 

pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee or examiner has been 

appointed in this Chapter 11 Case. The Office of the United States Trustee appointed the 

Committee on October 29, 2019. 

24. Judicial Notice. The Bankruptcy Court takes judicial notice of the docket 

in this Chapter 11 Case maintained by the clerk of the Bankruptcy Court and the court-appointed 

claims agent, Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC (“KCC”), including, without limitation, all 

pleadings, notices, and other documents filed, all orders entered, and all evidence and arguments 

made, proffered or adduced at the hearings held before the Bankruptcy Court during this Chapter 

11 Case, including, without limitation, the hearing to consider the adequacy of the Disclosure 

Statement and the Confirmation Hearing, as well as all pleadings, notices, and other documents 

filed, all orders entered, and all evidence and arguments made, proffered, or adduced at hearings 

held before the Bankruptcy Court or the District Court for the Northern District of Texas in 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 22 of 161

Appx. 0042

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 23 of 162 PageID 96

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 23 of 162

000127

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 96 of 235 PageID 189
 23 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

connection with an adversary proceeding or appellate proceeding, respectively, related to this 

Chapter 11 Case. 

25. Plan Supplement Documents. Prior to the Confirmation Hearing, the 

Debtor filed each of the Plan Supplements. The Plan Supplements contain, among other 

documents, the Retained Causes of Action, the Claimant Trust Agreement, the Litigation SubTrust Agreement, the Senior Employee Stipulation, the Related Entity List, the Schedule of 

Employees, the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, supplements to the Liquidation 

Analysis/Financial Projections, the Schedule of Contracts and Leases to be Assumed, and the other 

Plan Documents set forth therein (collectively, the “Plan Supplement Documents”). 

26. Retained Causes of Action Adequately Preserved. The Bankruptcy 

Court finds that the list of Retained Causes of Action included in the Plan Supplementssufficiently 

describes all potential Retained Causes of Action, provides all persons with adequate notice of any 

Causes of Action regardless of whether any specific claim to be brought in the future is listed 

therein or whether any specific potential defendant or other party is listed therein, and satisfies 

applicable law in all respects to preserve all of the Retained Causes of Action. The definition of 

the Causes of Action and Schedule of Retained Causes of Action, and their inclusion in the Plan, 

specifically and unequivocally preserve the Causes of Action for the benefit of the Reorganized 

Debtor, the Claimant Trust, or the Litigation Sub-Trust, as applicable. 

27. Plan Modifications Are Non-Material. In addition to the Plan 

Supplements, the Debtor made certain non-material modifications to the Plan, which are reflected 

in (i) the Redline of Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 23 of 161

Appx. 0043

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 24 of 162 PageID 97

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 24 of 162

000128

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 97 of 235 PageID 190
 24 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

(as Modified) filed on January 22, 2021 [Docket No. 1809], and (ii) Exhibit B to the Debtor’s 

Notice of Filing of Plan Supplement to Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. (as Modified) filed on February 1, 2021 [Docket No. 1875] (collectively, the 

“Plan Modifications”). Section 1127(a) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a plan proponent 

may modify its plan at any time before confirmation so long as such modified plan meets the 

requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code. None of the modifications set 

forth in the Plan Supplements or the Plan Modifications require any further solicitation pursuant 

to sections 1125, 1126, or 1127 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 3019, because, 

among other things, they do not materially adversely change the treatment of the claims of any 

creditors or interest holders who have not accepted, in writing, such supplements and 

modifications. Among other things, there were changes to the projections that the Debtor filed 

shortly before the Confirmation Hearing (which included projected distributions to creditors and 

a comparison of projected distributions under the Plan to potential distributions under a 

hypothetical chapter 7 liquidation). The Plan Supplements and Plan Modifications did not mislead 

or prejudice any creditors or interest holders nor do they require that Holders of Claims or Equity 

Interests be afforded an opportunity to change previously cast votes to accept or reject the Plan. 

Specifically, the Amended Liquidation Analysis/Financial Projections filed on February 1, 2021 

[Docket No. 1875] do not constitute any material adverse change to the treatment of any creditors 

or interest holders but, rather, simply update the estimated distributions based on Claims that were 

settled in the interim and provide updated financial data. The filing and notice of the Plan 

Supplements and Plan Modifications were appropriate and complied with the requirements of 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 24 of 161

Appx. 0044

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 25 of 162 PageID 98

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 25 of 162

000129

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 98 of 235 PageID 191
 25 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

section 1127(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules, and no other solicitation or 

disclosure or further notice is or shall be required. The Plan Supplements and Plan Modifications 

each became part of the Plan pursuant section 1127(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtor or 

Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, is authorized to modify the Plan or Plan Supplement 

Documents following entry of this Confirmation Order in a manner consistent with section 1127(b) 

of the Bankruptcy Code, the Plan, and, if applicable, the terms of the applicable Plan Supplement 

Document. 

28. Notice of Transmittal, Mailing and Publication of Materials. As is 

evidenced by the Voting Certifications and the Affidavits of Service and Publication, the 

transmittal and service of the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, Ballots, and Confirmation Hearing 

Notice were adequate and sufficient under the circumstances, and all parties required to be given 

notice of the Confirmation Hearing (including the deadline for filing and serving objections to the 

confirmation of the Plan) have been given due, proper, timely, and adequate notice in accordance 

with the Disclosure Statement Order and in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy 

Rules, the Local Rules, and applicable non-bankruptcy law, and such parties have had an 

opportunity to appear and be heard with respect thereto. No other or further notice is required. 

The publication of the Confirmation Hearing Notice, as set forth in the Notice of Affidavit of 

Publication dated December 3, 2020 [Docket No. 1505], complied with the Disclosure Statement 

Order. 

29. Voting. The Bankruptcy Court has reviewed and considered the Voting 

Certifications. The procedures by which the Ballots for acceptance or rejection of the Plan were 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 25 of 161

Appx. 0045

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 26 of 162 PageID 99

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 26 of 162

000130

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 99 of 235 PageID 192
 26 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

distributed and tabulated, including the tabulation as subsequently amended to reflect the 

settlement of certain Claims to be Allowed in Class 7, were fairly and properly conducted and 

complied with the Disclosure Statement Order, the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, and 

the Local Rules. 

30. Bankruptcy Rule 3016(a). In accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 3016(a), 

the Plan is dated and identifies the Debtor as the proponent of the Plan. 

31. Plan Compliance with Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(1)). As 

set forth below, the Plan complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, 

thereby satisfying section 1129(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

32. Proper Classification (11 U.S.C. §§ 1122, 1123(a)(1)). Section 1122 of 

the Bankruptcy Code provides that a plan may place a claim or interest in a particular class only if 

such claim or interest is substantially similar to the other claims or interest of such class. The 

Claims and Equity Interests placed in each Class are substantially similar to other Claims and 

Equity Interests, as the case may be, in each such Class. Valid business, factual, and legal reasons 

exist for separately classifying the various Classes of Claims and Equity Interests created under 

the Plan, and such Classes do not unfairly discriminate between Holders of Claims and Equity 

Interests. 

33. Classification of Secured Claims. Class 1 (Jefferies Secured Claim) and 

Class 2 (Frontier Secured Claim) each constitute separate secured claims held by Jefferies LLC 

and Frontier State Bank, respectively, and it is proper and consistent with section 1122 of the 

Bankruptcy Code to separately classify the claims of these secured creditors. Class 3 (Other 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 26 of 161

Appx. 0046

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 27 of 162 PageID 100

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 27 of 162

000131

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 100 of 235 PageID 193
 27 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Secured Claims) consists of other secured claims (to the extent any exist) against the Debtor, are 

not substantially similar to the Secured Claims in Class 1 or Class 2, and are also properly 

separately classified. 

34. Classification of Priority Claims. Class 4 (Priority Non-Tax Claims) 

consists of Claims entitled to priority under section 507(a), other than Priority Tax Claims, and are 

properly separately classified from non-priority unsecured claims. Class 5 (Retained Employee 

Claims) consists of the potential claims of employees who may be retained by the Debtor on the 

Effective Date, which claims will be Reinstated under the Plan, are not substantially similar to 

other Claims against the Debtor, and are properly classified. 

35. Classification of Unsecured Claims. Class 6 (PTO Claims) consists solely 

of the claims of the Debtor’s employees for unpaid paid time off in excess of the $13,650 statutory 

cap amount under sections 507(a)(4) and (a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code and are dissimilar from 

other unsecured claims in Class 7 and Class 8. Class 7 (Convenience Claims) allows holders of 

eligible and liquidated Claims (below a certain threshold dollar amount) to receive a cash payout 

of the lesser of 85% of the Allowed amount of the creditor’s Claim or such holder’s pro rata share 

of the Convenience Claims Cash Pool. Class 7 (Convenience Claims) are provided for 

administrative convenience purposes in order to allow creditors, most of whom are either trade 

creditors or holders of professional claims, to receive treatment provided under Class 7 in lieu of 

the treatment of Class 8 (General Unsecured Claims). The Plan also provides for reciprocal “opt 

out” mechanisms to allow holders of Class 7 Claims to elect to receive the treatment for Class 8 

Claims. Class 8 creditors primarily constitute the litigation claims of the Debtor. Class 8 Creditors 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 27 of 161

Appx. 0047

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 28 of 162 PageID 101

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 28 of 162

000132

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 101 of 235 PageID 194
 28 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

will receive Claimant Trust Interests which will be satisfied pursuant to the terms of the Plan. 

Class 8 also contains an “opt out” mechanism to allow holders of liquidated Class 8 Claims at or 

below a $1 million threshold to elect to receive the treatment of Class 7 Convenience Claims. The 

Claims in Class 7 (primarily trade and professional Claims against the Debtor) are not substantially 

similar to the Claims in Class 8 (primarily the litigation Claims against the Debtor), and are 

appropriately separately classified. Valid business reasons also exist to classify creditors in Class 

7 separately from creditors in Class 8. Class 7 creditors largely consist of liquidated trade or 

service providers to the Debtor. In addition, the Claims of Class 7 creditors are small relative to 

the large litigation claims in Class 8. Furthermore, the Class 8 Claims were overwhelmingly 

unliquidated when the Plan was filed. The nature of the Class 7 Claims as being largely liquidated 

created an expectation of expedited payment relative to the largely unliquidated Claims in Class 

8, which consists in large part of parties who have been engaged in years, and in some cases over 

a decade of litigation with the Debtor. Separate classification of Class 7 and Class 8 creditors was 

the subject of substantial arm’s-length negotiations between the Debtor and the Committee to 

appropriately reflect these relative differences. 

36. Classification of Equity Interests. The Plan properly separately classifies 

the Equity Interests in Class 10 (Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests) from the Equity Interests 

in Class 11 (Class A Limited Partnership Interests) because they represent different types of equity 

security interests in the Debtor and different payment priorities. 

37. Elimination of Vacant Classes. Section III.C of the Plan provides for the 

elimination of Classes that do not have at least one holder of a Claim or Equity Interest that is 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 28 of 161

Appx. 0048

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 29 of 162 PageID 102

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 29 of 162

000133

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 102 of 235 PageID 195
 29 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Allowed in an amount greater than zero for purposes of voting to accept or reject the Plan, and are 

disregarded for purposes of determining whether the Plan satisfies section 1129(a)(8) of the 

Bankruptcy Code with respect to such Class. The purpose of this provision is to provide that a 

Class that does not have voting members shall not be included in the tabulation of whether that 

Class has accepted or rejected the Plan. Pursuant to the Voting Certifications, the only voting 

Class of Claims or Equity Interests that did not have any members is Class 5 (Retained 

Employees). As noted above, Class 5 does not have any voting members because any potential 

Claims in Class 5 would not arise, except on account of any current employees of the Debtor who 

may be employed as of the Effective Date, which is currently unknown. Thus, the elimination of 

vacant Classes provided in Article III.C of the Plan does not violate section 1122 of the Bankruptcy 

Code. Class 5 is properly disregarded for purposes of determining whether or not the Plan has 

been accepted under Bankruptcy Code section 1129(a)(8) because there are no members in that 

Class. However, the Plan properly provides for the treatment of any Claims that may potentially 

become members of Class 5 as of the Effective Date in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The 

Plan therefore satisfies section 1122 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

38. Classification of Claims and Designation of Non-Classified Claims (11 

U.S.C. §§ 1122, 1123(a)(1)). Section 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the Plan 

specify the classification of claims and equity security interests pursuant to section 1122 of the 

Bankruptcy Code, other than claims specified in sections 507(a)(2), 507(a)(3), or 507(a)(8) of the 

Bankruptcy Code. In addition to Administrative Claims, Professional Fee Claims, and Priority 

Tax Claims, each of which need not be classified pursuant to section 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 29 of 161

Appx. 0049

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 30 of 162 PageID 103

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 30 of 162

000134

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 103 of 235 PageID 196
 30 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Code, the Plan designates eleven (11) Classes of Claims and Equity Interests. The Plan satisfies 

sections 1122 and 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

39. Specification of Unimpaired Classes (11 U.S.C. § 1123(a)(2)). Article III 

of the Plan specifies that each of Class 1 (Jefferies Secured Claim), Class 3 (Other Secured 

Claims), Class 4 (Priority Non-Tax Claims), Class 5 (Retained Employee Claims), and Class 6 

(PTO Claims) are Unimpaired under the Plan. Thus, the requirement of section 1123(a)(2) of the 

Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

40. Specification of Treatment of Impaired Classes (11 U.S.C. § 

1123(a)(3)). Article III of the Plan designates each of Class 2 (Frontier Secured Claim), Class 7 

(Convenience Claims), Class 8 (General Unsecured Claims), Class 9 (Subordinated Claims), Class 

10 (Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests), and Class 11 (Class A Limited Partnership Interests) 

as Impaired and specifies the treatment of Claims and Equity Interests in such Classes. Thus, the 

requirement of section 1123(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

41. No Discrimination (11 U.S.C. § 1123(a)(4)). The Plan provides for the 

same treatment by the Plan proponent for each Claim or Equity Interest in each respective Class 

unless the Holder of a particular Claim or Equity Interest has agreed to a less favorable treatment 

of such Claim or Equity Interest. The Plan satisfies this requirement because Holders of Allowed 

Claims or Equity Interests in each Class will receive the same rights and treatment as other Holders 

of Allowed Claims or Equity Interests within such holder’s respective class, subject only to the 

voluntary “opt out” options afforded to members of Class 7 and Class 8 in accordance with the 

terms of the Plan. Thus, the requirement of section 1123(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 30 of 161

Appx. 0050

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 31 of 162 PageID 104

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 31 of 162

000135

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 104 of 235 PageID 197
 31 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

42. Implementation of the Plan (11 U.S.C. § 1123(a)(5)). Article IV of the 

Plan sets forth the means for implementation of the Plan which includes, but is not limited to, the 

establishment of: (i) the Claimant Trust; (ii) the Litigation Sub-Trust; (iii) the Reorganized Debtor; 

and (iv) New GP LLC, in the manner set forth in the Plan Documents, the forms of which are 

included in the Plan Supplements. 

a. The Claimant Trust. The Claimant Trust Agreement provides for the 

management of the Claimant Trust, as well as the Reorganized Debtor with the 

Claimant Trust serving as the managing member of New GP LLC (a wholly-owned 

subsidiary of the Claimant Trust that will manage the Reorganized Debtor as its 

general partner). The Claimant Trust, the Claimant Trustee, the management and 

monetization of the Claimant Trust Assets, and the management of the Reorganized 

Debtor (through the Claimant Trust’s role as managing member of New GP LLC) 

and the Litigation Sub-Trust will all be managed and overseen by the Claimant 

Trust Oversight Committee. Additionally, the Plan provides for the transfer to the 

Claimant Trust of all of the Debtor’s rights, title, and interest in and to all of the 

Claimant Trust Assets in accordance with section 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code and 

for the Claimant Trust Assets to automatically vest in the Claimant Trust free and 

clear of all Claims, Liens, encumbrances, or interests subject only to the Claimant 

Trust Interests and the Claimant Trust Expenses, as provided for in the Claimant 

Trust Agreement. The Claimant Trust will administer the Claimant Trust Assets as 

provided under the Plan and the Claimant Trust Agreement contained in the Plan 

Supplements. 

b. The Litigation Sub-Trust. The Plan and the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement 

provide for the transfer to the Litigation Sub-Trust all of the Claimant Trust’s rights, 

title, and interest in and to all of the Estate Claims (as transferred to the Claimant 

Trust by the Debtor) in accordance with section 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code and 

for the Estate Claims to automatically vest in the Litigation Sub-Trust free and clear 

of all Claims, Liens, encumbrances, or interests subject only to the Litigation SubTrust Interests and the Litigation Sub-Trust Expenses, as provided for in the 

Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement. The Litigation Trustee is charged with 

investigating, pursuing, and otherwise resolving any Estate Claims (including those 

with respect to which the Committee has standing to pursue prior to the Effective 

Date pursuant to the January 9 Order) pursuant to the terms of the Litigation SubTrust Agreement and the Plan, regardless of whether any litigation with respect to 

any Estate Claim was commenced by the Debtor or the Committee prior to the 

Effective Date. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 31 of 161

Appx. 0051

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 32 of 162 PageID 105

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 32 of 162

000136

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 105 of 235 PageID 198
 32 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

c. The Reorganized Debtor. The Reorganized Debtor will administer the 

Reorganized Debtor Assets, which includes managing the wind down of the 

Managed Funds. 

The precise terms governing the execution of these restructuring transactions are set forth in greater 

detail in the applicable definitive documents included in the Plan Supplements, including the 

Claimant Trust Agreement, the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement, and the Schedule of Retained 

Causes of Action. The Plan, together with the documents and forms of agreement included in the 

Plan Supplements, provides a detailed blueprint for the transactions contemplated by the Plan. The 

Plan’s various mechanisms provide for the Debtor’s continued management of its business as it 

seeks to liquidate the Debtor’s assets, wind down its affairs, and pay the Claims of the Debtor’s 

creditors. Upon full payment of Allowed Claims, plus interest as provided in the Plan, any residual 

value would then flow to the holders of Class 10 (Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests), and 

Class 11 (Class A Limited Partnership Interests). Finally, Mr. Seery testified that the Debtor 

engaged in substantial and arm’s length negotiations with the Committee regarding the Debtor’s 

post-Effective Date corporate governance, as reflected in the Plan. Mr. Seery testified that he 

believes the selection of the Claimant Trustee, Litigation Trustee, and members of the Claimant 

Trust Oversight Board are in the best interests of the Debtor’s economic constituents. Thus, the 

requirements of section 1123(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code are satisfied. 

43. Non-Voting Equity Securities (11 U.S.C. § 1123(a)(6)). The Debtor is 

not a corporation and the charter documents filed in the Plan Supplements otherwise comply with 

section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the requirement of section 1123(a)(6) of 

the Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 32 of 161

Appx. 0052

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 33 of 162 PageID 106

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 33 of 162

000137

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 106 of 235 PageID 199
 33 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

44. Selection of Officers and Directors (11 U.S.C. § 1123(a)(7)). Article IV 

of the Plan provides for the Claimant Trust to be governed and administered by the Claimant 

Trustee. The Claimant Trust, the management of the Reorganized Debtor, and the management 

and monetization of the Claimant Trust Assets and the Litigation Sub-Trust will be managed by 

the Claimant Trust Oversight Board. The Claimant Trust Oversight Board will consist of: (1) Eric 

Felton, as representative of the Redeemer Committee; (2) Joshua Terry, as representative of Acis; 

(3) Elizabeth Kozlowski, as representative of UBS; (4) Paul McVoy, as representative of Meta-E 

Discovery; and (5) David Pauker. Four of the members of the Claimant Trust Oversight 

Committee are the holders of several of the largest Claims against the Debtor and/or are current 

members of the Committee. Each of these creditors has actively participated in the Debtor’s case, 

both through their fiduciary roles as Committee members and in their individual capacities as 

creditors. They are therefore intimately familiar with the Debtor, its business, and assets. The 

fifth member of the Claimant Trustee Oversight Board, David Pauker, is a disinterested 

restructuring advisor and turnaround manager with more than 25 years of experience advising 

public and private companies and their investors, and he has substantial experience overseeing, 

advising or investigating troubled companies in the financial services industry and has advised or 

managed such companies on behalf of boards or directors, court-appointed trustees, examiners and 

special masters, government agencies, and private investor parties. The members of the Claimant 

Trust Oversight Board will serve without compensation, except for Mr. Pauker, who will receive 

payment of $250,000 for his first year of service, and $150,000 for subsequent years. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 33 of 161

Appx. 0053

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 34 of 162 PageID 107

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 34 of 162

000138

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 107 of 235 PageID 200
 34 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

45. Selection of Trustees. The Plan Supplements disclose that Mr. Seery will 

serve as the Claimant Trustee and Marc Kirschner will serve as the Litigation Trustee. As noted 

above, Mr. Seery has served as an Independent Board member since January 2020, and as the 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer since July 2020, and he has extensive 

management and restructuring experience, as evidenced from his curriculum vitae which is part of 

the record. The evidence shows that Mr. Seery is intimately familiar with the Debtor’s 

organizational structure, business, and assets, as well as how Claims will be treated under the Plan. 

Accordingly, it is reasonable and in the Estate’s best interests to continue Mr. Seery’s employment 

post-emergence as the Claimant Trustee. Mr. Seery, upon consultation with the Committee, 

testified that he intends to employ approximately 10 of the Debtor’s employees to enable him to 

manage the Debtor’s business until the Claimant Trust effectively monetizes its remaining assets, 

instead of hiring a sub-servicer to accomplish those tasks. Mr. Seery testified that he believes that 

the Debtor’s post-confirmation business can most efficiently and cost-effectively be supported by 

a sub-set of the Debtor’s current employees, who will be managed internally. Mr. Seery shall 

initially be paid $150,000 per month for services rendered after the Effective Date as Claimant 

Trustee; however, Mr. Seery’s long-term salary as Claimant Trustee and the terms of any bonuses 

and severance are subject to further negotiation by Mr. Seery and the Claimant Trust Oversight 

Board within forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date. The Bankruptcy Court has also 

reviewed Mr. Kirschner’s curriculum vitae. Mr. Kirschner has been practicing law since 1967 and 

has substantial experience in bankruptcy litigation matters, particularly with respect to his prior 

experience as a litigation trustee for several litigation trusts, as set forth on the record of the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 34 of 161

Appx. 0054

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 35 of 162 PageID 108

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 35 of 162

000139

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 108 of 235 PageID 201
 35 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Confirmation Hearing and in the Confirmation Brief. Mr. Kirschner shall be paid $40,000 per 

month for the first three months and $20,000 per month thereafter, plus a success fee related to 

litigation recoveries. The Committee and the Debtor had arm’s lengths negotiations regarding the 

post-Effective Date corporate governance structure of the Reorganized Debtor and believe that the 

selection of the Claimant Trustee, the Litigation Trustee, and the Claimant Trust Oversight 

Committee are in the best interests of the Debtor’s economic stakeholders. Section 1123(a)(7) of 

the Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

46. Debtor’s Compliance with Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(2)). 

Pursuant to section 1129(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtor has complied with the 

applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, including sections 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, and 

1126 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, and the Disclosure Statement Order 

governing notice, disclosure, and solicitation in connection with the Plan, the Disclosure 

Statement, the Plan Supplements, and all other matters considered by the Bankruptcy Court in 

connection with this Chapter 11 Case. 

47. Debtor’s Solicitation Complied with Bankruptcy Code and Disclosure 

Statement Order. Before the Debtor solicited votes on the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court entered 

the Disclosure Statement Order. In accordance with the Disclosure Statement Order and evidenced 

by the Affidavits of Service and Publication, the Debtor appropriately served (i) the Solicitation 

Packages (as defined in the Disclosure Statement Order) on the Holders of Claims in Classes 2, 7, 

8 and 9 and Holders of Equity Interests in Classes 10 and 11 who were entitled to vote on the Plan; 

and (ii) the Notice of Nonvoting Status (as defined in the Disclosure Statement Order) and the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 35 of 161

Appx. 0055

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 36 of 162 PageID 109

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 36 of 162

000140

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 109 of 235 PageID 202
 36 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Confirmation Hearing Notice to the Holders of Claims in Classes 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, who were not 

entitled to vote on the Plan pursuant to the Disclosure Statement Order. The Disclosure Statement 

Order approved the contents of the Solicitation Packages provided to Holders of Claims and Equity 

Interests entitled to vote on the Plan, the notices provided to parties not entitled to vote on the Plan, 

and the deadlines for voting on and objecting to the Plan. The Debtor and KCC each complied 

with the content and delivery requirements of the Disclosure Statement Order, thereby satisfying 

sections 1125(a) and (b) of the Bankruptcy Code, as evidenced by the Affidavits of Service and 

Publication. The Debtor also satisfied section 1125(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides 

that the same disclosure statement must be transmitted to each holder of a claim or interest in a 

particular class. The Debtor caused the same Disclosure Statement to be transmitted to all holders 

of Claims and Equity Interests entitled to vote on the Plan. The Debtor has complied in all respects 

with the solicitation requirements of section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code and the Disclosure 

Statement Order. The Bankruptcy Court rejects the arguments of the Mr. Dondero and certain 

Dondero Related Entities that the changes made to certain assumptions and projections from the 

Liquidation Analysis annexed as Exhibit C to the Disclosure Statement (the “Liquidation 

Analysis”) to the Amended Liquidation Analysis/Financial Projections require resolicitation of the 

Plan. The Bankruptcy Court heard credible testimony from Mr. Seery regarding the changes to 

the Liquidation Analysis as reflected in the Amended Liquidation Analysis/Financial Projections. 

Based on the record, including the testimony of Mr. Seery, the Bankruptcy Court finds that the 

changes between the Liquidation Analysis and the Amended Liquidation Analysis/Financial 

Projections do not constitute materially adverse change to the treatment of Claims or Equity 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 36 of 161

Appx. 0056

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 37 of 162 PageID 110

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 37 of 162

000141

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 110 of 235 PageID 203
 37 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Interests. Instead, the changes served to update the projected distributions based on Claims that 

were settled after the approval of the Disclosure Statement and to otherwise incorporate more 

recent financial data. Such changes were entirely foreseeable given the large amount of 

unliquidated Claims at the time the Disclosure Statement was approved and the nature of the 

Debtor’s assets. The Bankruptcy Court therefore finds that holders of Claims and Equity Interests 

were not misled or prejudiced by the Amended Liquidation Analysis/Financial Projections and the 

Plan does not need to be resolicited. 

48. Plan Proposed in Good Faith and Not by Means Forbidden by Law (11 

U.S.C. § 1129(a)(3)). The Debtor has proposed the Plan in good faith and not by any means 

forbidden by law, thereby satisfying section 1129(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code. In determining 

that the Plan has been proposed in good faith, the Bankruptcy Court has examined the totality of 

the circumstances surrounding the filing of this Chapter 11 Case, the Plan itself, and the extensive, 

unrebutted testimony of Mr. Seery in which he described the process leading to Plan’s formulation. 

Based on the totality of the circumstances and Mr. Seery’s testimony, the Bankruptcy Court finds 

that the Plan is the result of extensive arm’s-length negotiations among the Debtor, the Committee, 

and key stakeholders, and promotes the objectives and purposes of the Bankruptcy Code. 

Specifically, the Debtor’s good faith in proposing the Plan is supported by the following facts 

adduced by Mr. Seery: 

a. The Independent Board determined that it should consider all potential 

restructuring alternatives, including pursuit of a traditional restructuring and the 

continuation of the Debtor’s business, a potential sale of the Debtor’s assets in one 

or more transactions, an asset monetization plan similar to that described in the 

Plan, and a so-called “grand bargain” plan that would involve Mr. Dondero’s 

sponsorship of a plan with a substantial equity infusion. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 37 of 161

Appx. 0057

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 38 of 162 PageID 111

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 38 of 162

000142

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 111 of 235 PageID 204
 38 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

b. The Debtor subsequently engaged in arm’s-length, good faith negotiations with the 

Committee over an asset monetization Plan commencing in June 2020, which 

negotiations occurred over the next several months. 

c. Negotiations between the Debtor and the Committee were often contentious over 

disputes, including, but not limited to, the post-confirmation corporate governance 

structure and the scope of releases contemplated by the Plan. 

d. While negotiations with the Committee progressed, the Independent Board engaged 

in discussions with Mr. Dondero regarding a potential “grand bargain” plan which 

contemplated a significant equity infusion by Mr. Dondero, and which Mr. Seery 

personally spent hundreds of hours pursuing over many months. 

e. On August 3, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Order Directing Mediation

[Docket No. 912] pursuant to which the Bankruptcy Court ordered the Debtor, the 

Committee, UBS, Acis, the Redeemer Committee, and Mr. Dondero into 

mediation. As a result of this mediation, the Debtor negotiated the settlement of 

the claims of Acis and Mr. Terry, which the Bankruptcy Court approved on October 

28, 2020 [Docket No. 1302]. 

f. On August 12, 2020, the Debtor filed its Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. [Docket No. 944] (the “Initial Plan”) and 

related disclosure statement (the “Initial Disclosure Statement”) which were not 

supported by either the Committee or Mr. Dondero. The Independent Board filed 

the Initial Plan and Initial Disclosure Statement in order to act as a catalyst for 

continued discussions with the Committee while it simultaneously worked with Mr. 

Dondero on the “grand bargain” plan. 

g. The Bankruptcy Court conducted a contested hearing on the Initial Disclosure 

Statement on October 27, 2020. The Committee and other parties objected to 

approval of the Disclosure Statement at the Initial Disclosure Statement hearing, 

which was eventually continued to November 23, 2020. 

h. Following the Initial Disclosure Statement hearing, the Debtor continued to 

negotiate with the Committee and ultimately resolved the remaining material 

disputes and led to the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the Disclosure Statement on 

November 23, 2020. 

i. Even after obtaining the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the Disclosure Statement, 

the Debtor and the Committee continued to negotiate with Mr. Dondero and the 

Committee over a potential “pot plan” as an alternative to the Plan on file with the 

Bankruptcy Court, but such efforts were unsuccessful. This history conclusively 

demonstrates that the Plan is being proposed in good faith within the meaning of 

section 1129(a)(3). 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 38 of 161

Appx. 0058

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 39 of 162 PageID 112

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 39 of 162

000143

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 112 of 235 PageID 205
 39 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

49. Payments for Services or Costs and Expenses (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(4)). 

Article II.B of the Plan provides that Professionals will file all final requests for payment of 

Professional Fee Claims no later than 60 days after the Effective Date, thereby providing an 

adequate period of time for interested parties to review such claims. The procedures set forth in 

the Plan for the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the fees, costs, and expenses to be paid in 

connection with this chapter 11 Case, or in connection with the Plan and incident to this Chapter 

11 Case, satisfy the objectives of and are in compliance with section 1129(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy 

Code. 

50. Directors, Officers, and Insiders (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(5)). Article IV.B 

of the Plan provides for the appointment of the Claimant Trustee, Litigation Trustee, and the 

Claimant Trust Oversight Committee and the members thereto. For the reasons more fully 

explained in paragraphs 44-45 of this Confirmation Order with respect to the requirement of 

section 1123(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtor has disclosed the nature of compensation 

of any insider to be employed or retained by the Reorganized Debtor, if applicable, and 

compensation for any such insider. The appointment of such individuals is consistent with the 

interests of Claims and Equity Interests and with public policy. Thus, the Plan satisfies section 

1129(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

51. No Rate Changes (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(6)). The Plan does not provide for 

any rate change that requires regulatory approval. Section 1129(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code is 

thus not applicable. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 39 of 161

Appx. 0059

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 40 of 162 PageID 113

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 40 of 162

000144

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 113 of 235 PageID 206
 40 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

52. Best Interests of Creditors (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(7)). The “best interests” 

test is satisfied as to all Impaired Classes under the Plan, as each Holder of a Claim or Equity 

Interest in such Impaired Classes will receive or retain property of a value, as of the Effective Date 

of the Plan, that is not less than the amount that such Holder would so receive or retain if the 

Debtor were liquidated under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. On October 15, 2020, the Debtor 

filed the Liquidation Analysis [Docket 1173], as prepared by the Debtor with the assistance of its 

advisors and which was attached as Exhibit C to the Disclosure Statement. On January 29, 2021, 

in advance of Mr. Seery’s deposition in connection with confirmation of the Plan, the Debtor 

provided an updated version of the Liquidation Analysis to the then-objectors of the Plan, 

including Mr. Dondero and the Dondero Related Entities. On February 1, 2021, the Debtor filed 

the Amended Liquidation Analysis/Financial Projections. The Amended Liquidation 

Analysis/Financial Projections included updates to the Debtor’s projected asset values, revenues, 

and expenses to reflect: (1) the acquisition of an interest in an entity known as “HCLOF” that the 

Debtor will acquire as part of its court-approved settlement with HarbourVest and that was valued 

at $22.5 million; (2) an increase in the value of certain of the Debtor’s assets due to changes in 

market conditions and other factors; (3) expected revenues and expenses arising in connection with 

the Debtor’s continued management of the CLOs pursuant to management agreements that the 

Debtor decided to retain; (4) increases in projected expenses for headcount (in addition to adding 

two or three employees to assist in the management of the CLOs, the Debtor also increased 

modestly the projected headcount as a result of its decision not to engage a Sub-Servicer) and 

professional fees; and (5) an increase in projected recoveries on notes resulting from the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 40 of 161

Appx. 0060

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 41 of 162 PageID 114

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 41 of 162

000145

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 114 of 235 PageID 207
 41 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

acceleration of term notes owed to the Debtor by the following Dondero Related Entities: 

NexPoint Advisors, L.P.; Highland Capital Management Services, Inc.; and HCRE Partners, LLC 

(n/k/a NexPoint Real Estate Partners, LLC). Under the Plan, as of the Confirmation Date, (a) Class 

7 General Unsecured Creditors are projected to receive 85% on account of their claims; and (b) 

Class 8 General Unsecured Creditors are projected to receive at least approximately 71% on 

account of their Claims. Under a hypothetical chapter 7 liquidation, all general unsecured creditors 

are projected to receive approximately 55% on account of their Claims. The Bankruptcy Court 

finds that the distributions that Class 7 and 8 General Unsecured Creditors are projected to receive 

under the Plan substantially exceeds that which they would receive under a chapter 7 liquidation 

based on Mr. Seery’s testimony, including the following credible reasons he posited, among 

others: 

a. The nature of the Debtor’s assets is complex. Certain assets relate to complicated 

real estate structures and private equity investments in operating businesses. Mr. 

Seery’s extensive experience with the Debtor during the thirteen months since his 

appointment as an Independent Director and later Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Restructuring Officer, provides him with a substantial learning curve in 

connection with the disposition of the Debtor’s assets and are reasonably expected 

to result in him being able to realize tens of millions of dollars more value than 

would a chapter 7 trustee. 

b. Assuming that a hypothetical chapter 7 trustee could even operate the Debtor’s 

business under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and hire the necessary personnel 

with the relevant knowledge and experience to assist him or her in selling the 

Debtor’s assets, a chapter 7 trustee would likely seek to dispose of the Debtor’s 

assets in a forced sale liquidation which would generate substantially less value for 

the Debtor’s creditors than the asset monetization plan contemplated by the Plan. 

c. A chapter 7 trustee would be unlikely to retain the Debtor’s existing professionals 

to assist in its efforts to monetize assets, resulting in delays, increased expenses, 

and reduced asset yields for the chapter 7 estate. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 41 of 161

Appx. 0061

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 42 of 162 PageID 115

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 42 of 162

000146

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 115 of 235 PageID 208
 42 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

d. The chapter 7 estate would be unlikely to maximize value as compared to the asset 

monetization process contemplated by the Plan because potential buyers are likely 

to perceive a chapter 7 trustee as engaging in a quick, forced “fire sale” of assets; 

and 

e. The Debtor’s employees, who are vital to its efforts to maximum value and 

recoveries for stakeholders, may be unwilling to provide services to a chapter 7 

trustee. 

Finally, there is no evidence to support the objectors’ argument that the Claimant Trust 

Agreement’s disclaimed liability for ordinary negligence by the Claimant Trustee compared to a 

chapter 7 trustee’s liability has any relevance to creditor recoveries in a hypothetical chapter 7 

liquidation. Thus, section 1129(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

53. Acceptance by Certain Classes (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(8)). Classes 1, 3, 4, 

5 and 6 are Unimpaired under the Plan. Class 2 (Frontier Secured Claim), Class 7 (Convenience 

Claims), and Class 9 (Subordinated Claims) have each voted to accept the Plan in accordance with 

the Bankruptcy Code, thereby satisfying section 1129(a)(8) as to those Classes. However, Class 

8 (General Unsecured Claims), Class 10 (Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests), and Class 11 

(Class A Limited Partnership Interests) have not accepted the Plan. Accordingly, section 

1129(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code has not been satisfied. The Plan, however, is still confirmable 

because it satisfies the nonconsensual confirmation provisions of section 1129(b), as set forth 

below. 

54. Treatment of Administrative, Priority, Priority Tax Claims, and 

Professional Fee Claims (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(9)). The treatment of Administrative Claims, 

Priority Claims, and Professional Fee Claims pursuant to Article III of the Plan, and as set forth 

below with respect to the resolution of the objections filed by the Internal Revenue Service and 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 42 of 161

Appx. 0062

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 43 of 162 PageID 116

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 43 of 162

000147

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 116 of 235 PageID 209
 43 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

certain Texas taxing authorities satisfies the requirements of sections 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy 

Code. 

55. Acceptance by Impaired Class (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(10)). Class 2 

(Frontier Secured Claims) and Class 7 (Convenience Claims) are each Impaired Classes of Claims 

that voted to accept the Plan, determined without including any acceptance of the Plan by any 

insider. Therefore, the requirement of section 1129(a)(10) of the Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

56. Feasibility (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(11)). Article IV of the Plan provides for 

the implementation of the Plan through the Claimant Trust, the Litigation Sub-Trust, and the 

Reorganized Debtor. The Plan provides that the Claimant Trust, among other things, will monetize 

and distribute the Debtor’s remaining assets. The Disclosure Statement, the Amended Liquidation 

Analysis/Financial Projections, and the other evidence presented at the Confirmation Hearing 

provide a reasonable probability of success that the Debtor will be able to effectuate the provisions 

of the Plan. The Plan contemplates the establishment of the Claimant Trust upon the Effective 

Date, which will monetize the Estate’s assets for the benefit of creditors. Mr. Seery testified that 

the Class 2 Frontier Secured Claim will be paid over time pursuant to the terms of the New Frontier 

Note and the Reorganized Debtor will have sufficient assets to satisfy its obligations under this 

note. The Claims of the Holders of Class 7 Claims (as well as those Class 8 creditors who validly 

opted to receive the treatment of Class 7 Claims) are expected to be satisfied shortly after the 

Effective Date. Holders of Class 8 Claims (including any holders of Class 7 Claims who opted to 

receive the treatment provided to Class 8 Claims) are not guaranteed any recovery and will 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 43 of 161

Appx. 0063

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 44 of 162 PageID 117

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 44 of 162

000148

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 117 of 235 PageID 210
 44 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

periodically receive pro rata distributions as assets are monetized pursuant to the Plan and the 

Claimant Trust Agreement. Thus, section 1129(a)(11) of the Bankruptcy Code is satisfied. 

57. Payment of Fees (11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(12)). All fees payable under 28 

U.S.C. § 1930 have been paid or will be paid on or before the Effective Date pursuant to Article 

XII.A of the Plan, thus satisfying the requirement of section 1129(a)(12) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

The Debtor has agreed that the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trust, and the Litigation SubTrust shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of quarterly fees to the Office of the United 

States Trustee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930 through the entry of the Final Decree for the Debtor 

or the dismissal or conversion of the Chapter 11 Case. 

58. Retiree Benefits. The Plan provides for the assumption of the Pension Plan 

(to the extent such Pension Plan provides “retiree benefits” and is governed by section 1114 of the 

Bankruptcy Code). Thus, the Plan complies with section 1129(a)(13) of the Bankruptcy Code, to 

the extent applicable.

59. Miscellaneous Provisions (11 U.S.C. §§ 1129(a)(14)-(16)). Sections 

1129(a)(14)-(16) of the Bankruptcy Code are inapplicable as the Debtor (i) has no domestic 

support obligations (section 1129(a)(14)), (ii) is not an individual (section 1129(a)(15)), and (iii) 

is not a nonprofit corporation (section 1129(a)(16)). 

60. No Unfair Discrimination; Fair and Equitable Treatment (11 U.S.C. § 

1129(b)). The classification and treatment of Claims and Equity Interests in Classes 8, 10 and 11, 

which have not accepted the Plan, is proper pursuant to section 1122 of the Bankruptcy Code, does 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 44 of 161

Appx. 0064

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 45 of 162 PageID 118

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 45 of 162

000149

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 118 of 235 PageID 211
 45 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

not discriminate unfairly, and is fair and equitable pursuant to section 1129(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy 

Code. 

a. Class 8. The Plan is fair and equitable with respect to Class 8 General Unsecured 

Claims. While Equity Interests in Class 10 and Class 11 will receive a contingent 

interest in the Claimant Trust under the Plan (the “Contingent Interests”), the 

Contingent Interests will not vest unless and until holders of Class 8 General 

Unsecured Claims and Class 9 Subordinated Claims receive distributions equal to 

100% of the amount of their Allowed Claims plus interest as provided under the 

Plan and Claimant Trust Agreement. Accordingly, as the holders of Equity 

Interests that are junior to the Claims in Class 8 and Class 9 will not receive or 

retain under the Plan on account of such junior claim interest any property unless 

and until the Claims in Class 8 and Class 9 are paid in full plus applicable interest, 

the Plan is fair and equitable with respect to holders of Class 8 General Unsecured 

Claims pursuant to section 1129(b)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and the reasoning 

of In re Introgen Therapuetics 429 B.R 570 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2010). 

b. Class 10 and Class 11. There are no Claims or Equity Interests junior to the Equity 

Interests in Class 10 and Class 11. Equity Interests in Class 10 and 11 will neither 

receive nor retain any property under the Plan unless Allowed Claims in Class 8 

and Class 9 are paid in full plus applicable interest pursuant to the terms of the Plan 

and Claimant Trust Agreement. Thus, the Plan does not violate the absolute priority 

rule with respect to Classes 10 and 11 pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 

1129(b)(2)(C). The Plan does not discriminate unfairly as to Equity Interests. As 

noted above, separate classification of the Class B/C Partnership Interests from the 

Class A Partnerships Interests is appropriate because they constitute different 

classes of equity security interests in the Debtor, and each are appropriately 

separately classified and treated. 

Accordingly, the Plan does not violate the absolute priority rule, does not discriminate unfairly, 

and is fair and equitable with respect to each Class that has rejected the Plan. Thus, the Plan 

satisfies the requirements of section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code with respect to Classes 8, 10, 

and 11. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 45 of 161

Appx. 0065

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 46 of 162 PageID 119

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 46 of 162

000150

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 119 of 235 PageID 212
 46 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

61. Only One Plan (11 U.S.C. § 1129(c)). The Plan is the only chapter 11 plan 

confirmed in this Chapter 11 Case, and the requirements of section 1129(c) of the Bankruptcy 

Code are therefore satisfied. 

62. Principal Purpose (11 U.S.C. § 1129(d)). Mr. Seery testified that the 

principal purpose of the Plan is neither the avoidance of taxes nor the avoidance of the application 

of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, and no governmental unit has objected to the 

confirmation of the Plan on any such grounds. Accordingly, section 1129(d) of the Bankruptcy 

Code is inapplicable. 

63. Satisfaction of Confirmation Requirements. Based upon the foregoing, 

the Plan satisfies the requirements for confirmation set forth in section 1129 of the Bankruptcy 

Code and should be confirmed. 

64. Good Faith Solicitation (11 U.S.C. § 1125(e)). The Debtor, the 

Independent Directors, and the Debtor’s employees, advisors, Professionals, and agents have acted 

in good faith within the meaning of section 1125(e) of the Bankruptcy Code and in compliance 

with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules in connection with 

all of their respective activities relating to the solicitation of acceptances of the Plan and their 

participation in the activities described in section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code, and they are 

entitled to the protections afforded by section 1125(e) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

65. Discharge (11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(3)). The Debtor is entitled to a discharge 

of debts pursuant to section 1141(d)(3)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code. Under the Plan, the Claimant 

Trust or Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, will continue to manage funds and conduct business 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 46 of 161

Appx. 0066

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 47 of 162 PageID 120

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 47 of 162

000151

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 120 of 235 PageID 213
 47 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

in the same manner as the Debtor did prior to Plan confirmation, which includes the management 

of the CLOs, Multi-Strat, Restoration Capital, the Select Fund and the Korea Fund. Although the 

Plan projects that it will take approximately two years to monetize the Debtor’s assets for fair 

value, Mr. Seery testified that while the Reorganized Debtor and Claimant Trust will be 

monetizing their assets, there is no specified time frame by which this process must conclude. Mr. 

Seery’s credible testimony demonstrates that the Debtor will continue to engage in business after 

consummation of the Plan, within the meaning of Section 1141(d)(3)(b) and that the Debtor is 

entitled to a discharge pursuant to section 1141(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

66. Retention of Jurisdiction. The Bankruptcy Court may properly retain 

jurisdiction over the matters set forth in Article XI of the Plan and/or section 1142 of the 

Bankruptcy Code to the maximum extent under applicable law. 

67. Additional Plan Provisions (11 U.S.C. § 1123(b)). The Plan’s provisions 

are appropriate, in the best interests of the Debtor and its Estate, and consistent with the applicable 

provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules, and Local Rules. 

68. Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases (11 U.S.C. § 1123(b)(2)). 

The Debtor has exercised reasonable business judgment with respect to the rejection of the 

Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases pursuant the terms of the Plan and this Confirmation 

Order, and such rejections are justified and appropriate in this Chapter 11 Case. The Debtor also 

filed the List of Assumed Contracts, which contain notices to the applicable counterparties to the 

contracts set forth on Exhibit “FF” to Plan Supplement filed on February 1, 2021 [Docket No. 

1875] and which exhibit sets forth the list of executory contracts and unexpired leases to be 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 47 of 161

Appx. 0067

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 48 of 162 PageID 121

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 48 of 162

000152

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 121 of 235 PageID 214
 48 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

assumed by the Debtor pursuant to the Plan (collectively, the “Assumed Contracts”). With respect 

to the Assumed Contracts, only one party objected to the assumption of any of the Assumed 

Contracts, but that objection was withdrawn.8

 Any modifications, amendments, supplements, and 

restatements to the Assumed Contracts that may have been executed by the Debtor during the 

Chapter 11 Case shall not be deemed to alter the prepetition nature of the Assumed Contracts or 

the validity, priority, or amount of any Claims that may arise in connection therewith. Assumption 

of any Assumed Contract pursuant to the Plan and full payment of any applicable Cure pursuant 

to the Plan shall result in the full release and satisfaction of any Cures, Claims, or defaults, whether 

monetary or nonmonetary, including defaults of provisions restricting the change in control or 

ownership interest composition or other bankruptcy-related defaults, arising under any assumed 

Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease at any time prior to the effective date of assumption. 

69. Compromises and Settlements Under and in Connection with the Plan 

(11 U.S.C. § 1123(b)(3)). All of the settlements and compromises pursuant to and in connection 

with the Plan, comply with the requirements of section 1123(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code and 

Bankruptcy Rule 9019. 

70. Debtor Release, Exculpation and Injunctions (11 U.S.C. § 1123(b)). The 

Debtor Release, Exculpation, and Injunction provisions provided in the Plan (i) are within the 

jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1334; (ii) are integral elements of the 

transactions incorporated into the Plan, and inextricably bound with the other provisions of the 

Plan; (iii) confer material benefit on, and are in the best interests of, the Debtor, its Estate, and its 

8 See Notice of Withdrawal of James Dondero’s Objection Debtor’s Proposed Assumption of Contracts and Cure 

Amounts Proposed in Connection Therewith [Docket No. 1876] 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 48 of 161

Appx. 0068

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 49 of 162 PageID 122

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 49 of 162

000153

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 122 of 235 PageID 215
 49 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

creditors; (iv) are fair, equitable, and reasonable; (v) are given and made after due notice and 

opportunity for hearing; (vi) satisfy the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 9019; and (vii) are 

consistent with the Bankruptcy Code and other applicable law, and as set forth below. 

71. Debtor Release. Section IX.D of the Plan provides for the Debtor’s release 

of the Debtor’s and Estate’s claims against the Released Parties. Releases by a debtor are 

discretionary and can be provided by a debtor to persons who have provided consideration to the 

Debtor and its estate pursuant to section 1123(b)(3)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code. Contrary to the 

objections raised by Mr. Dondero and certain of the Dondero Related Entities, the Debtor Release 

is appropriately limited to release claims held by the Debtor and does not purport to release the 

claims held by the Claimant Trust, Litigation Sub-Trust, or other third parties. The Plan does not 

purport to release any claims held by third parties and the Bankruptcy Court finds that the Debtor 

Release is not a “disguised” release of any third party claims as asserted by certain objecting 

parties. The limited scope of the Debtor Release in the Plan was extensively negotiated with the 

Committee, particularly with the respect to the Debtor’s conditional release of claims against 

employees, as identified in the Plan, and the Plan’s conditions and terms of such releases. The 

Plan does not release (i) any obligations of any party under the Plan or any document, instrument, 

or agreement executed to implement the Plan, (ii) the rights or obligations of any current employee 

of the Debtor under any employment agreement or plan, (iii) the rights of the Debtor with respect 

to any confidentiality provisions or covenants restricting competition in favor of the Debtor under 

any employment agreement with a current or former employee of the Debtor, (iv) any Avoidance 

Actions, or (v) any Causes of Action arising from willful misconduct, criminal misconduct, actual 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 49 of 161

Appx. 0069

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 50 of 162 PageID 123

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 50 of 162

000154

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 123 of 235 PageID 216
 50 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

fraud, or gross negligence of such applicable Released Party as determined by Final Order of the 

Bankruptcy Court or any other court of competent jurisdiction. The Debtor Release also contains 

conditions to such releases as set forth in Article X.D of the Plan with respect to employees (the 

“Release Conditions”). Until the an employee satisfies the Release Conditions or the Release 

Conditions otherwise terminate, any claims against such employee will be tolled so that if the 

Release Conditions are not met the Litigation Trustee may pursue claims against an employee at a 

later date. The evidence before the Bankruptcy Court, including, but not limited to Mr. Seery’s 

testimony, demonstrates that the Debtor is not aware of any claims against any of the Released 

Parties, that the Released Parties have been instrumental in assisting the Debtor’s efforts toward 

confirmation of the Plan and that, therefore, the releases are a quid pro quo for the Released 

Parties’ significant contributions to a highly complex and contentious restructuring. The 

Committee, whose members hold approximately $200 million in claims against the Estate, is 

highly sophisticated and is represented by highly sophisticated professionals, and has actively and 

vigorously negotiated the terms of the Debtor Release, which was the subject of significant 

controversy at the Initial Disclosure Statement hearing held by the Bankruptcy Court on October 

27, 2020. 

72. Exculpation. Section IX.C of the Plan provides for the exculpation of 

certain Exculpated Parties to the extent provided therein (the “Exculpation Provision”). As 

explained below, the Exculpation Provision is appropriate under the unique circumstances of this 

litigious Chapter 11 Case and consistent with applicable Fifth Circuit precedent. First, with respect 

to the Independent Directors, their agents, and their advisors, including any employees acting at 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 50 of 161

Appx. 0070

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 51 of 162 PageID 124

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 51 of 162

000155

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 124 of 235 PageID 217
 51 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

their direction, the Bankruptcy Court finds and concludes that it has already exculpated these 

parties for acts other than willful misconduct and gross negligence pursuant to the January 9 Order. 

The January 9 Order was specifically agreed to by Mr. Dondero, who was in control of the Debtor 

up until entry of the January 9 Order. The January 9 Order was not appealed. In addition to the 

appointment of the Independent Directors in an already contentious and litigious case, the January 

9 Order set the standard of care for the Independent Directors and specifically exculpated them for 

negligence. Mr. Seery and Mr. Dubel each testified that they had input into the contents of the 

January 9 Order and would not have agreed to their appointment as Independent Directors if the 

January 9 Order did not include the protections set forth in paragraph 10 of the January 9 Order. 

Paragraph 10 of the January 9 Order (1) requires that parties wishing to sue the Independent 

Directors or their agents and advisors must first seek approval from the Bankruptcy Court before 

doing so; (2) sets the standard of care for the Independent Directors during the Chapter 11 Case 

and exculpated the Independent Directors for acts other than willful misconduct or gross 

negligence; (3) only permits suits against the Independent Directors to proceed for colorable claims 

of willful misconduct and gross negligence upon order of the Bankruptcy Court; and (4) does not 

expire by its terms. 

73. Existing Exculpation of Independent Directors. The Bankruptcy Court 

also finds and concludes that it has already exculpated Mr. Seery acting in the capacity as Chief 

Executive Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer pursuant to the July 16 Order. The Bankruptcy 

Court concludes its previous approval of the exculpation of the Independent Directors, their agents, 

advisors and employees working at their direction pursuant to the January 9 Order, and the Chief 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 51 of 161

Appx. 0071

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 52 of 162 PageID 125

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 52 of 162

000156

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 125 of 235 PageID 218
 52 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Executive Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer pursuant to the July 16 Order constitutes the 

law of this case and are res judicata pursuant to In re Republic Supply Co. v. Shoaf, 815 F.2d 1046 

(5th Cir.1987). The January 9 Order and July 16 Order cannot be collaterally attacked based on 

the objectors’ objection to the exculpation of the Independent Directors, their agents, and advisors, 

including any employees acting at their direction, as well as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief 

Restructuring Officer, that the Bankruptcy Court already approved pursuant to the January 9 Order 

and the July 16 Order. 

74. The Exculpation Provision Complies with Applicable Law. Separate 

and apart from the res judicata effect of the January 9 Order and the July 16 Order, the Bankruptcy 

Court also finds and concludes that the Exculpation Provision is consistent with applicable law, 

including In re Pacific Lumber Co., 584 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2009), for several reasons: 

a. First, the statutory basis for Pacific Lumber’s denial of exculpation for certain 

parties other than a creditors’ committee and its members is that section 524(e) of 

the Bankruptcy Code “only releases the debtor, not co-liable third parties.” Pacific 

Lumber, 253 F.3d. at 253. However, Pacific Lumber does not prohibit all 

exculpations under the Bankruptcy Code and the court in such case specifically 

approved the exculpations of a creditors’ committee and its members on the 

grounds that “11 U.S.C. § 1103(c), which lists the creditors’ committee’s powers, 

implies committee members have qualified immunity for actions within the scope 

of their duties.... [I]f members of the committee can be sued by persons unhappy 

with the committee’s performance during the case or unhappy with the outcome of 

the case, it will be extremely difficult to find members to serve on an official 

committee.” Pacific Lumber, 253 F.3d at 253 (quoting Lawrence P. King, et al, 

Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 1103.05[4][b] (15th Ed. 2008]). Pacific Lumber’s

rationale for permitted exculpation of creditors’ committees and their members 

(which was clearly policy-based and based on a creditors’ committee qualified 

immunity flowing from their duties under section 1103(c) of the Bankruptcy Code 

and their disinterestedness and importance in chapter 11 cases) does not preclude 

exculpation to other parties in a particular chapter 11 case that perform similar roles 

to a creditors’ committee and its members. The Independent Directors, and by 

extension the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer, were not 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 52 of 161

Appx. 0072

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 53 of 162 PageID 126

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 53 of 162

000157

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 126 of 235 PageID 219
 53 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

part of the Debtor’s enterprise prior to their appointment by the Bankruptcy Court 

under the January 9 Order. The Bankruptcy Court appointed the Independent 

Directors in lieu of a chapter 11 trustee to address what the Bankruptcy Court 

perceived as serious conflicts of interest and fiduciary duty concerns with the thenexisting management prior to January 9, 2020, as identified by the Committee. In 

addition, the Bankruptcy Court finds that the Independent Directors expected to be 

exculpated from claims of negligence, and would likely have been unwilling to 

serve in contentious cases absent exculpation. The uncontroverted testimony of 

Mr. Seery and Mr. Dubel demonstrates that the Independent Directors would not 

have agreed to accept their roles without the exculpation and gatekeeper provision 

in the January 9 Order. Mr. Dubel also testified as to the increasing important role 

that independent directors are playing in complex chapter 11 restructurings and that 

unless independent directors could be assured of exculpation for simple negligence 

in contentious bankruptcy cases they would be reluctant to accept appointment in 

chapter 11 cases which would adversely affect the chapter 11 restructuring process. 

The Bankruptcy Court concludes that the Independent Directors were appointed 

under the January 9 Order in order to avoid the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee 

and are analogous to a creditors’ committee rather than an incumbent board of 

directors. The Bankruptcy Court also concludes that if independent directors 

cannot be assured of exculpation for simple negligence in contentious bankruptcy 

cases, they may not be willing to serve in that capacity. Based upon the foregoing, 

the Bankruptcy Court concludes that Pacific Lumber’s policy of exculpating 

creditors’ committees and their members from “being sued by persons unhappy 

with the committee’s performance during the case or unhappy with the outcome of 

the case” is applicable to the Independent Directors in this Chapter 11 Case.9

 

b. Second, the Bankruptcy Court also concludes that Pacific Lumber does not 

preclude the exculpation of parties if there is a showing that “costs [that] the 

released parties might incur defending against such suits alleging such negligence 

are likely to swamp either the Exculpated Parties or the reorganization.” Pacific 

Lumber, 584 F.3d at 252. If ever there was a risk of that happening in a chapter 11 

reorganization, it is this one. Mr. Seery credibly testified that Mr. Dondero stated 

outside the courtroom that if Mr. Dondero’s pot plan does not get approved, that 

Mr. Dondero will “burn the place down.” The Bankruptcy Court can easily expect 

that the proposed Exculpated Parties might expect to incur costs that could swamp 

them and the reorganization based on the prior litigious conduct of Mr. Dondero 

and his controlled entities that justify their inclusion in the Exculpation Provision. 

9

 The same reasoning applies to the inclusion of Strand in the Exculpation Provision because Strand is the general 

partner of the Debtor through which each of the Independent Board members act. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 53 of 161

Appx. 0073

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 54 of 162 PageID 127

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 54 of 162

000158

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 127 of 235 PageID 220
 54 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

75. Injunction. Section IX.D of the Plan provides for a Plan inunction to 

implement and enforce the Plan’s release, discharge and release provisions (the “Injunction 

Provision”). The Injunction Provision is necessary to implement the provisions in the Plan. Mr. 

Seery testified that the Claimant Trustee will monetize the Debtor’s assets in order to maximize 

their value. In order to accomplish this goal, the Claimant Trustee needs to be able to pursue this 

objective without the interference and harassment of Mr. Dondero and his related entities, 

including the Dondero Related Entities. Mr. Seery also testified that if the Claimant Trust was 

subject to interference by Mr. Dondero, it would take additional time to monetize the Debtor’s 

assets and those assets could be monetized for less money to the detriment of the Debtor’s 

creditors. The Bankruptcy Court finds and concludes that the Injunction Provision is consistent 

with and permissible under Bankruptcy Code sections 1123(a), 1123(a)(6), 1141(a) and (c), and 

1142. The Bankruptcy Court rejects assertions by certain objecting parties that the Injunction 

Provision constitutes a “third-party release.” The Injunction Provision is appropriate under the 

circumstances of this Chapter 11 Case and complies with applicable bankruptcy law. The 

Bankruptcy Court also concludes that the terms “implementation” and “consummation” are neither 

vague nor ambiguous 

76. Gatekeeper Provision. Section IX.F of the Plan contains a provision 

contained in paragraph AA of this Confirmation Order and which the Debtor has referred to as a 

gatekeeper provision (the “Gatekeeper Provision”). The Gatekeeper Provision requires that 

Enjoined Parties first seek approval of the Bankruptcy Court before they may commence an action 

against Protected Parties. Thereafter, if the Bankruptcy Court determines that the action is 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 54 of 161

Appx. 0074

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 55 of 162 PageID 128

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 55 of 162

000159

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 128 of 235 PageID 221
 55 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

colorable, the Bankruptcy Court may, if it has jurisdiction, adjudicate the action. The Bankruptcy 

Court finds that the inclusion of the Gatekeeper Provision is critical to the effective and efficient 

administration, implementation, and consummation of the Plan. The Bankruptcy Court also 

concludes that the Bankruptcy Court has the statutory authority as set forth below to approve the 

Gatekeeper Provision. 

77. Factual Support for Gatekeeper Provision. The facts supporting the need 

for the Gatekeeper Provision are as follows. As discussed earlier in this Confirmation Order, prior 

to the commencement of the Debtor’s bankruptcy case, and while under the direction of Mr. 

Dondero, the Debtor had been involved in a myriad of litigation, some of which had gone on for 

years and, in some cases, over a decade. Substantially all of the creditors in this case are either 

parties who were engaged in litigation with the Debtor, parties who represented the Debtor in 

connection with such litigation and had not been paid, or trade creditors who provided litigationrelated services to the Debtor. During the last several months, Mr. Dondero and the Dondero 

Related Entities have harassed the Debtor, which has resulted in further substantial, costly, and 

time-consuming litigation for the Debtor. Such litigation includes: (i) entry of a temporary 

restraining order and preliminary injunction against Mr. Dondero [Adv. Proc. No. 20-03190 

Docket No. 10 and 59] because of, among other things, his harassment of Mr. Seery and employees 

and interference with the Debtor’s business operations; (ii) a contempt motion against Mr. 

Dondero for violation of the temporary restraining order, which motion is still pending before the 

Bankruptcy Court [Adv. Proc. No. 20-03190 Docket No. 48]; (iii) a motion by Mr. Dondero’s 

controlled investors in certain CLOs managed by the Debtor that the Bankruptcy Court referred to 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 55 of 161

Appx. 0075

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 56 of 162 PageID 129

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 56 of 162

000160

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 129 of 235 PageID 222
 56 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

as frivolous and a waste of the Bankruptcy Court’s time [Docket No. 1528] which was denied by 

the Court [Docket No. 1605]; (iv) multiple plan confirmation objections focused on ensuring the 

Dondero Related Entities be able to continue their litigation against the Debtor and its successors 

post-confirmation [Docket Nos. 1661, 1667, 1670, 1673, 1676, 1677 and 1868]; (v) objections to 

the approval of the Debtor’s settlements with Acis and HarbourVest and subsequent appeals of the 

Bankruptcy Court’s order approving each of those settlements [Docket Nos. 1347 and 1870]; and 

(vi) a complaint and injunction sought against Mr. Dondero’s affiliated entities to prevent them 

from violating the January 9 Order and entry of a restraining order against those entities [Adv Proc. 

No. 21-03000 Docket No 1] (collectively, the “Dondero Post-Petition Litigation”). 

78. Findings Regarding Dondero Post-Petition Litigation. The Bankruptcy 

Court finds that the Dondero Post-Petition Litigation was a result of Mr. Dondero failing to obtain 

creditor support for his plan proposal and consistent with his comments, as set forth in Mr. Seery’s 

credible testimony, that if Mr. Dondero’s plan proposal was not accepted, he would “burn down 

the place.” The Bankruptcy Court concludes that without appropriate protections in place, in the 

form of the Gatekeeper Provision, Mr. Dondero and his related entities will likely commence 

litigation against the Protected Parties after the Effective Date and do so in jurisdictions other than 

the Bankruptcy Court in an effort to obtain a forum which Mr. Dondero perceives will be more 

hospitable to his claims. The Bankruptcy Court also finds, based upon Mr. Seery’s testimony, that 

the threat of continued litigation by Mr, Dondero and his related entities after the Effective Date 

will impede efforts by the Claimant Trust to monetize assets for the benefit of creditors and result 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 56 of 161

Appx. 0076

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 57 of 162 PageID 130

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 57 of 162

000161

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 130 of 235 PageID 223
 57 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

in lower distributions to creditors because of costs and distraction such litigation or the threats of 

such litigation would cause. 

79. Necessity of Gatekeeper Provision. The Bankruptcy Court further finds 

that unless the Bankruptcy Court approves the Gatekeeper Provision, the Claimant Trustee and the 

Claimant Trust Oversight Board will not be able to obtain D&O insurance, the absence of which 

will present unacceptable risks to parties currently willing to serve in such roles. The Bankruptcy 

Court heard testimony from Mark Tauber, a Vice President with AON Financial Services, the 

Debtor’s insurance broker (“AON”), regarding his efforts to obtain D&O insurance. Mr. Tauber 

credibly testified that of all the insurance carriers that AON approached to provide D&O insurance 

coverage after the Effective Date, the only one willing to do so without an exclusion for claims 

asserted by Mr. Dondero and his affiliates otherwise requires that this Order approve the 

Gatekeeper Provision. Based on the foregoing, the Bankruptcy Court finds that the Gatekeeper 

Provision is necessary and appropriate in light of the history of the continued litigiousness of Mr. 

Dondero and his related entities in this Chapter 11 Case and necessary to the effective and efficient 

administration, implementation and consummation of the Plan and is appropriate pursuant to 

Carroll v. Abide (In re Carroll) 850 F.3d 811 (5th Cir. 2017). Approval of the Gatekeeper 

Provision will prevent baseless litigation designed merely to harass the post-confirmation entities 

charged with monetizing the Debtor’s assets for the benefit of its economic constituents, will avoid 

abuse of the court system and preempt the use of judicial time that properly could be used to 

consider the meritorious claims of other litigants. Any suit against a Protected Party would 

effectively be a suit against the Debtor, and the Debtor may be required to indemnify the Protected 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 57 of 161

Appx. 0077

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 58 of 162 PageID 131

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 58 of 162

000162

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 131 of 235 PageID 224
 58 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Parties under the Limited Partnership Agreement, which will remain in effect through the Effective 

Date, or those certain Indemnification and Guaranty Agreements, dated January 9, 2020, between 

Strand, the Debtor, and each Independent Director, following the Confirmation Date as each such 

agreement will be assumed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365 pursuant to the Plan. 

80. Statutory Authority to Approve Gatekeeper Provision. The 

Bankruptcy Court finds it has the statutory authority to approve the Gatekeeper Provision under 

sections 1123(a)(5), 1123(b)(6), 1141, 1142(b), and 105(a). The Gatekeeper Provision is also 

within the spirit of the Supreme Court’s “Barton Doctrine.” Barton v. Barbour, 104 U.S. 126 

(1881). The Gatekeeper Provision is also consistent with the notion of a prefiling injunction to 

deter vexatious litigants, that has been approved by the Fifth Circuit in such cases as Baum v. Blue 

Moon Ventures, LLC, 513 F.3d 181, 189 (5th Cir. 2008), and In re Carroll, 850 F.3d 811 (5th Cir. 

2017). 

81. Jurisdiction to Implement Gatekeeper Provision. The Bankruptcy Court 

finds that it will have jurisdiction after the Effective Date to implement the Gatekeeper Provision 

as post-confirmation bankruptcy court jurisdiction has been interpreted by the Fifth Circuit under 

United States Brass Corp. v. Travelers Ins. Group, Inc. (In re United States Brass Corp.), 301 F.3d 

296 (5th Cir. 2002) and EOP-Colonnade of Dallas Ltd. P’Ship v. Faulkner (In re Stonebridge 

Techs., Inc.), 430 F.3d 260 (5th Cir. 2005). Based upon the rationale of the Fifth Circuit in Villegas 

v. Schmidt, 788 F.3d 156, 158-59 (5th Cir. 2015), the Bankruptcy Court’s jurisdiction to act as a 

gatekeeper does not violate Stern v. Marshall. The Bankruptcy Court’s determination of whether 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 58 of 161

Appx. 0078

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 59 of 162 PageID 132

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 59 of 162

000163

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 132 of 235 PageID 225
 59 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

a claim is colorable, which the Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction to determine, is distinct from 

whether the Bankruptcy Court would have jurisdiction to adjudicate any claim it finds colorable. 

82. Resolution of Objections of Scott Ellington and Isaac Leventon. Each 

of Scott Ellington (“Mr. Ellington”) and Isaac Leventon (“Mr. Leventon”) (each, a “Senior 

Employee Claimant”) has asserted certain claims for liquidated but unpaid bonus amounts for the 

following periods: 2016, 2017, and 2018, as set forth in Exhibit A to that certain Senior Employees’ 

Limited Objection to Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan of Reorganization [Docket No. 1669] (the 

“Senior Employees’ Objection”) (for each of Mr. Ellington and Mr. Leventon, the “Liquidated 

Bonus Claims”). 

a. Mr. Ellington has asserted Liquidated Bonus Claims in the aggregate amount of 

$1,367,197.00, and Mr. Leventon has asserted Liquidated Bonus Claims in the 

aggregate amount of $598,198.00. Mr. Ellington received two Ballots10 – a Ballot 

for Class 7 of the Plan and a Ballot for Class 8 of the Plan. Mr. Ellington completed 

and timely returned both of such Ballots, voted to reject the Plan, and elected to 

have his Class 8 Liquidated Bonus Claims treated under Class 7 of the Plan, subject 

to the objections and reservations of rights set forth in the Senior Employees’ 

Objection. If Mr. Ellington is permitted to elect Class 7 treatment for his Liquidated 

Bonus Claims, then the maximum amount of his Liquidated Bonus Claims will be 

$1,000,000. 

b. Mr. Leventon received two Ballots—a Ballot for Class 7 of the Plan and a Ballot 

for Class 8 of the Plan. Mr. Leventon completed and timely returned both of such 

Ballots and voted each such Ballots to rejected the Plan. 

c. The Senior Employees’ Objection, among other things, objects to the Plan on the 

grounds that the Debtor improperly disputes the right of Mr. Ellington to elect Class 

7 treatment for his Liquidated Bonus Claims and Mr. Leventon’s entitlement to 

receive Class 7 Convenience Class treatment for his Liquidated Bonus Claims. The 

Debtor contended that neither Mr. Ellington or Mr. Leventon were entitled to elect 

to receive Class 7 Convenience Class treatment on account of their Liquidated 

10 As defined in the Plan, “Ballot” means the forms(s) distributed to holders of Impaired Claims or Equity Interests 

entitled to vote on the Plan on which to indicate their acceptance or rejection of the Plan. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 59 of 161

Appx. 0079

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 60 of 162 PageID 133

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 60 of 162

000164

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 133 of 235 PageID 226
 60 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Bonus Claims under the terms of the Plan, the Disclosure Statement Order or 

applicable law. 

d. The Debtor and Mr. Ellington and Mr. Leventon negotiated at arms’ length in an 

effort to resolve all issues raised in the Senior Employee’s Objection, including 

whether or not Mr. Ellington and Mr. Leventon were entitled to Class 7 

Convenience Class treatment of their Liquidated Bonus Claims. As a result of such 

negotiation, the Debtor, Mr. Ellington, and Mr. Leventon have agreed to the 

settlement described in paragraphs 82(e) through 82(k) below and approved and 

effectuated pursuant to decretal paragraphs RR through SS (the “Senior Employees' 

Settlement”). 

e. Under the terms of the Senior Employees' Settlement, the Debtor has the right to 

elect one of two treatments of the Liquidated Bonus Claims for a Senior Employee 

Claimant. Under the first treatment option (“Option A”), the Liquidated Bonus 

Claims will be entitled to be treated in Class 7 of the Plan, and the Liquidated Bonus 

Claims will be entitled to receive payment in an amount equal to 70.125% of the 

Class 7 amount of the Liquidated Bonus Claims, subject to the Liquidated Bonus 

Claims becoming Allowed Claims under the terms of the Plan. Under this 

calculation, Mr. Ellington would be entitled to receive $701,250.00 on account of 

his Class 7 Convenience Class Claim when and as Allowed under the Plan, and Mr. 

Leventon would be entitled to receive $413,175.10 on account of his Class 7 

Convenience Class Claim when and as Allowed under the Plan. If, however, any 

party in interest objects to the allowance of the Senior Employee Claimant's 

Liquidated Bonus Claims and does not prevail in such objection, then such Senior 

Employee Claimant will be entitled to a payment in an amount equal to 85% of his 

Allowed Liquidated Bonus Claims (subject, in the case of Mr. Ellington, to the cap 

imposed on Class 7 Claims). In addition, under Option A, each of Mr. Ellington 

and Mr. Leventon would retain their respective rights to assert that the Liquidated 

Bonus Claims are entitled to be treated as Administrative Expense Claims, as 

defined in Article I.B.2. of the Plan, in which case the holder of such Liquidated 

Bonus Claims would be entitled to payment in full of the Allowed Liquidated 

Bonus Claims. Under Option A, parties in interest would retain the right to object 

to any motion seeking payment of the Liquidated Bonus Amounts as 

Administrative Expenses. 

f. Under the second treatment option (“Option B”), the Debtor would agree that the 

Senior Employee Claimant has Allowed Liquidated Bonus Claims, no longer 

subject to objection by any party in interest, in the amounts of the Liquidated Bonus 

Claims (subject, in the case of Mr. Ellington, to the cap imposed by Class 7). If the 

Debtor elects Option B as to a Senior Employee Claimant, then such Senior 

Employee Claimant would be entitled to a payment on account of his Allowed 

Liquidated Bonus Claims in an amount equal to 60% of the amount of the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 60 of 161

Appx. 0080

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 61 of 162 PageID 134

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 61 of 162

000165

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 134 of 235 PageID 227
 61 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Liquidated Bonus Claims (which, in Mr. Ellington’s case, would be $600,000 and 

in Mr. Leventon’s case, would be $358,918.80), and such payment would be the 

sole recovery on account of such Allowed Liquidated Bonus Claims. 

g. The Debtor may, with the consent of the Committee, elect Option B with respect to 

a Senior Employee Claimant at any time prior to the occurrence of the Effective 

Date. If the Debtor does not make an election, then Option A will apply. 

h. Under either Option A or Option B, Mr. Ellington and Mr. Leventon will retain all 

their rights with respect to all Claims other than the Liquidated Bonus Amounts, 

including, but not limited to, their Class 6 PTO Claims, other claims asserted as 

Class 8 General Unsecured Claims, the Senior Employees’ claims for 

indemnification against the Debtor, and any other claims that they may assert 

constitute Administrative Expense Claims, and any other such Claims are subject 

to the rights of any party in interest to object to such Claims, and the Debtor reserves 

any all of its rights and defenses in connection therewith. 

i. Subject to entry of this Confirmation Order and as set forth and announced on the 

record at the hearing on confirmation of the Plan and no party objecting thereto, 

Mr. Ellington and Mr. Leventon agreed to change the votes in their respective 

Ballots from rejection to acceptance of the Plan and to withdraw the Senior 

Employees’ Objection. 

j. The Senior Employees’ Settlement represents a valid exercise of the Debtor’s 

business judgment and satisfies the requirements for a compromise under 

Bankruptcy Rule 9019(a). 

k. For the avoidance of doubt, neither Mr. Leventon nor Mr. Ellington shall be a 

Released Party under the Plan regardless of how the Senior Employee Claimants’ 

Claims are to be treated hereunder. 

Based upon the foregoing findings, and upon the record made before the Bankruptcy Court 

at the Confirmation Hearing, and good and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is hereby 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

A. Confirmation of the Plan. The Plan is approved in its entirety and 

CONFIRMED under section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code. The terms of the Plan, including the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 61 of 161

Appx. 0081

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 62 of 162 PageID 135

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 62 of 162

000166

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 135 of 235 PageID 228
 62 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Plan Supplements and Plan Modifications, are incorporated by reference into and are an integral 

part of this Confirmation Order.11

B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The findings of fact and the 

conclusions of law set forth in this Confirmation Order and on the record of the Confirmation 

Hearing constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 

7052, made applicable to this proceeding by Bankruptcy Rule 9014. All findings of fact and 

conclusion of law announced by the Bankruptcy Court at the Confirmation Hearing in relation to 

confirmation of the Plan are hereby incorporated into this Confirmation Order. To the extent that 

any of the following constitutes findings of fact or conclusions of law, they are adopted as such. 

To the extent any findings of fact or conclusions of law set forth in this Confirmation Order 

(including any findings of fact or conclusions of law announced by the Bankruptcy Court at the 

Confirmation Hearing and incorporated herein) constitutes an order of the Bankruptcy Court, and 

is adopted as such. 

C. Objections. Any resolution or disposition of objections to confirmation of 

the Plan or otherwise ruled upon by the Bankruptcy Court on the record of the Confirmation 

Hearing is hereby incorporated by reference. All objections and all reservations of rights 

pertaining to confirmation of the Plan that have not been withdrawn, waived or settled are 

overruled on the merits, except as otherwise specifically provided in this Confirmation Order. 

D. Plan Supplements and Plan Modifications. The filing with the 

Bankruptcy Court of the Plan Supplements and the Plan Modifications constitutes due and 

11 The Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 62 of 161

Appx. 0082

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 63 of 162 PageID 136

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 63 of 162

000167

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 136 of 235 PageID 229
 63 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

sufficient notice thereof. Accordingly, pursuant to section 1127(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and 

Bankruptcy Rule 3019, the Plan Modifications and the Plan Supplements do not require additional 

disclosure under section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code or resolicitation of votes under section 1126 

of the Bankruptcy Code, nor do they require that Holders of Claims or Equity Interests be afforded 

an opportunity to change previously cast acceptances or rejections of the Plan. The Plan 

Modifications and the Plan Supplements constitute the Plan pursuant to section 1127(a) of the 

Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, the Plan, as modified, is properly before the Bankruptcy Court 

and all votes cast with respect to the Plan prior to such modification shall be binding and shall 

apply with respect to the Plan. 

E. Deemed Acceptance of Plan. In accordance with section 1127 of the 

Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 3019, all Holders of Claims and Equity Interests who voted 

to accept the Plan (or whom are conclusively presumed to accept the Plan) are deemed to have 

accepted the Plan as modified by the Plan Modifications. No holder of a Claim shall be permitted 

to change its vote as a consequence of the Plan Modifications. 

F. Vesting of Assets in the Reorganized Debtor. Except as otherwise 

provided in the Plan or this Confirmation Order, on or after the Effective Date, all Reorganized 

Debtor Assets will vest in the Reorganized Debtor, free and clear of all Liens, Claims, charges or 

other encumbrances pursuant to section 1141(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, except with respect to 

such Liens, Claims, charges, and other encumbrances that are specifically preserved under the Plan 

upon the Effective Date. The Reorganized Debtor shall be the exclusive trustee of the Reorganized 

Debtor Assets for purposes of 31 U.S.C. § 3713(b) and 26 U.S.C. § 6012(b)(3), as well as the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 63 of 161

Appx. 0083

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 64 of 162 PageID 137

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 64 of 162

000168

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 137 of 235 PageID 230
 64 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

representative of the Estate appointed pursuant to section 1123(b)(3)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code 

with respect to the Reorganized Debtor Assets. 

G. Effectiveness of All Actions. All actions contemplated by the Plan, 

including all actions in connection with the Claimant Trust Agreement, the Senior Employee 

Stipulation, the New GP LLC Documents, the New Frontier Note, the Reorganized Limited 

Partnership Agreement, the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement, and the other Plan Documents, are 

authorized to be taken on, prior to, or after the Effective Date, as applicable, under this 

Confirmation Order, without further application to or order of the Bankruptcy Court, or further 

action by the directors, managers, officers or partners of the Debtor or the Reorganized Debtor and 

with the effect that such actions had been taken by unanimous action of such parties. 

H. Restructuring Transactions. The Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, as 

applicable, are authorized to enter into and effectuate the Restructuring provided under the Plan, 

including, without limitation, the entry into and consummation of the transactions contemplated 

by the Claimant Trust Agreement, the Senior Employee Stipulation, the New GP LLC Documents, 

the New Frontier Note, the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, the Litigation Sub-Trust 

Agreement, and the other Plan Documents, and may take any actions as may be necessary or 

appropriate to effect a corporate restructuring of its business or a corporate restructuring of the 

overall corporate structure of the Reorganized Debtor, as and to the extent provided in the Plan. 

Any transfers of assets or equity interests effected or any obligations incurred through the 

Restructuring pursuant to the Plan are hereby approved and shall not constitute fraudulent 

conveyances or fraudulent transfers or otherwise be subject to avoidance. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 64 of 161

Appx. 0084

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 65 of 162 PageID 138

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 65 of 162

000169

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 138 of 235 PageID 231
 65 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

I. Preservation of Causes of Action. Unless a Cause of Action against a 

Holder of a Claim or an Equity Interest or other Entity is expressly waived, relinquished, released, 

compromised or settled in the Plan or any Final Order (including, without limitation, this 

Confirmation Order), such Cause of Action is expressly reserved for later adjudication by the 

Reorganized Debtor, the Litigation Sub-Trust, or the Claimant Trust, as applicable (including, 

without limitation, Causes of Action not specifically identified or of which the Debtor may 

presently be unaware or that may arise or exist by reason of additional facts or circumstances 

unknown to the Debtor at this time or facts or circumstances that may change or be different from 

those the Debtor now believes to exist) and, therefore, no preclusion doctrine, including, without 

limitation, the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim preclusion, 

waiver, estoppel (judicial, equitable or otherwise) or laches will apply to such Causes of Action as 

a consequence of the confirmation, effectiveness, or consummation of the Plan based on the 

Disclosure Statement, the Plan, or this Confirmation Order, except where such Causes of Action 

have been expressly released in the Plan or any other Final Order (including, without limitation, 

this Confirmation Order). In addition, the right of the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trust, or 

the Litigation Sub-Trust to pursue or adopt any claims alleged in any lawsuit in which the Debtor 

is a plaintiff, defendant or an interested party, against any Entity, including, without limitation, the 

plaintiffs or co-defendants in such lawsuits, is expressly reserved. 

J. Independent Board of Directors of Strand. The terms of the current 

Independent Directors shall expire on the Effective Date without the need for any further or other 

action by any of the Independent Directors. For avoidance of doubt, the Assumed Contracts 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 65 of 161

Appx. 0085

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 66 of 162 PageID 139

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 66 of 162

000170

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 139 of 235 PageID 232
 66 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

include the Indemnification and Guaranty Agreement between Highland Capital Management, 

Strand Advisors, Inc. and James Seery; the Indemnification and Guaranty Agreement between 

Highland Capital Management, Strand Advisors, Inc. and John Dubel and Indemnification and 

Guaranty Agreement between Highland Capital Management, Strand Advisors, Inc. and Russell 

Nelms and shall each remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the expiration of the terms of 

any Independent Directors. 

K. Cancellation of Equity Interests and Issuance of New Partnership 

Interests. On the Effective Date, all Class A Limited Partnership Interests, including the Class A 

Limited Partnership Interests held by Strand, as general partner, and Class B/C Limited 

Partnerships in the Debtor will be deemed cancelled, and all obligations or debts owed by, or 

Claims against, the Debtor on account of, or based upon, such Class A Limited Partnership 

Interests and Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests shall be deemed as cancelled, released, and 

discharged, including all obligations or duties by the Debtor relating to the Equity Interests in any 

of the Debtor’s formation documents, including the Limited Partnership Agreement. As of the 

Effective Date and pursuant to the Plan, new Class A Limited Partnership Interests in the 

Reorganized Debtor will be issued to the Claimant Trust and New GP LLC. The Claimant Trust, 

as limited partner, will ratify New GP LLC’s appointment as general partner of the Reorganized 

Debtor, and on and following the Effective Date, the Claimant Trust will be the Reorganized 

Debtor’s limited partner and New GP LLC will be its general partner. The Claimant Trust, as 

limited partner, and New GP LLC, as general partner, will execute the Reorganized Limited 

Partnership Agreement, which will amend and restate, in all respects, the Debtor’s current Limited 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 66 of 161

Appx. 0086

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 67 of 162 PageID 140

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 67 of 162

000171

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 140 of 235 PageID 233
 67 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Partnership Agreement. Following the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtor will be managed 

consistent with the terms of the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement by New GP LLC. 

The sole managing member of New GP LLC will be the Claimant Trust, and the Claimant Trustee 

will be the sole officer of New GP LLC on the Effective Date. 

L. Transfer of Assets to Claimant Trust. On or prior to the Effective Date, 

the Debtor shall irrevocably transfer and shall be deemed to have irrevocably transferred to the 

Claimant Trust all of its rights, title, and interest in and to all of the Claimant Trust Assets, and in 

accordance with section 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Claimant Trust Assets shall 

automatically vest in the Claimant Trust free and clear of all Claims, Liens, encumbrances, or 

interests subject only to the Claimant Trust Interests and the Claimant Trust Expenses, as provided 

for in the Claimant Trust Agreement, and such transfer shall be exempt from any stamp, real estate 

transfer, mortgage from any stamp, transfer, reporting, sales, use, or other similar tax. Following 

the Effective Date, the Claimant Trust will administer the Claimant Trust Assets pursuant to the 

Plan and the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

M. Transfer of Estate Claims to Litigation Sub-Trust. On or prior to the 

Effective Date, the Claimant Trust shall irrevocably transfer and shall be deemed to have 

irrevocably transferred to the Litigation Sub-Trust all of the Claimant Trust’s rights, title, and 

interest in and to all of the Estate Claims as successor in interest to the Debtor, and in accordance 

with section 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Estate Claims shall automatically vest in the 

Litigation Sub-Trust free and clear of all Claims, Liens, encumbrances, or interests subject only to 

the Litigation Sub-Trust Interests and Litigation Sub-Trust Expenses. The Litigation Trustee will 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 67 of 161

Appx. 0087

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 68 of 162 PageID 141

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 68 of 162

000172

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 141 of 235 PageID 234
 68 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

be authorized to investigate, pursue, and otherwise resolve the Estate Claims pursuant to the terms 

of the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement and the Plan, including as successor in interest to the Debtor 

or Committee, as applicable, in any litigation commenced prior to the Effective Date in which 

Estate Claims are asserted. 

N. Compromise of Controversies. In consideration for the distributions and 

other benefits, including releases, provided under the Plan, the provisions of the Plan constitute a 

good faith compromise and settlement of all Claims, Equity Interests, and controversies resolved 

under the Plan and the entry of this Confirmation Order constitutes approval of such compromise 

and settlement under Bankruptcy Rule 9019. 

O. Objections to Claims. The Claims Objection Deadline shall be the date 

that is 180 days after the Effective Date, provided, however, that the Claims Objection Deadline 

may be extended by the Bankruptcy Court upon a motion by the Claimant Trustee and as otherwise 

provided under the Plan. 

P. Assumption of Contracts and Leases. Effective as of the date of this 

Confirmation Order, each of the Assumed Contacts shall be assumed by the Debtor without the 

need for any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court, under section 

365 of the Bankruptcy Code and the payment of Cures, if any, shall be paid in accordance with the 

Plan. Each Assumed Contract shall include all modifications, amendments, supplements, 

restatements, or other agreements related thereto, and all rights related thereto, if any, including 

all easements, licenses, permits, rights, privileges, immunities, options, rights of first refusal, and 

any other interests. Modifications, amendments, supplements, and restatements to any of the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 68 of 161

Appx. 0088

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 69 of 162 PageID 142

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 69 of 162

000173

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 142 of 235 PageID 235
 69 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Assumed Contracts that have been executed by the Debtor during the Chapter 11 Case shall not 

be deemed to alter the prepetition nature of such Assumed Contracts or the validity, priority, or 

amount of any Claims that may arise in connection therewith. Assumption of the Assumed 

Contracts pursuant to Article V.A of the Plan and full payment of any applicable Cure pursuant to 

the Plan shall result in the full release and satisfaction of any Cures, Claims, or defaults, whether 

monetary or nonmonetary, including defaults of provisions restricting the change in control or 

ownership interest composition, or other bankruptcy-related defaults, arising under any Assumed 

Contracts. 

Q. Rejection of Contracts and Leases. Unless previously assumed during the 

pendency of the Chapter 11 Case or pursuant to the Plan, all other Executory Contracts and 

Unexpired Leases are rejected as of the date of the entry of this Confirmation Order and pursuant 

to the terms of the Plan. To the extent that any party asserts any damages resulting from the 

rejection of any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease, such claim must be filed within thirty 

(30) days following entry of this Confirmation Order, or such claim will be forever barred and 

disallowed against the Reorganized Debtor. 

R. Assumption of Issuer Executory Contracts. On the Confirmation Date, 

the Debtor will assume the agreements set forth on Exhibit B hereto (collectively, the “Issuer 

Executory Contracts”) pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code and Article V of the Plan. 

In full and complete satisfaction of its obligation to cure outstanding defaults under section 

365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtor or, as applicable, any successor manager under the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 69 of 161

Appx. 0089

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 70 of 162 PageID 143

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 70 of 162

000174

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 143 of 235 PageID 236
 70 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Issuer Executory Contracts (collectively, the “Portfolio Manager”) will pay to the Issuers12 a 

cumulative amount of $525,000 (the “Cure Amount”) as follows: 

a. $200,000 in cash on the date that is five business days from the Effective Date, with 

such payment paid directly to Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP (“SRZ”) in the amount of 

$85,714.29, Jones Walker LLP (“JW”) in the amount of $72,380.95, and Maples 

Group (“Maples” and collectively with SRZ and JW, the “Issuers’ Counsel”) in the 

amount of $41,904.76 as reimbursement for the attorney’s fees and other legal 

expenses incurred by the Issuers in connection with the Debtor’s bankruptcy case; 

and 

b. $325,000 in four equal quarterly payments of $81,250.00 (each, a “Payment”), 

which amounts shall be paid to SRZ in the amount of $34,821.43, JW in the amount 

of $29,404.76, and Maples in the amount of $17,023.81 as additional 

reimbursement for the attorney’s fees and other legal expenses incurred by the 

Issuers in connection with the Debtor’s bankruptcy case (i) from any management 

fees actually paid to the Portfolio Manager under the Issuer Executory Contracts 

(the “Management Fees”), and (ii) on the date(s) Management Fees are required to 

be paid under the Issuer Executory Contracts (the “Payment Dates”), and such 

obligation shall be considered an irrevocable direction from the Debtor and the 

Bankruptcy Court to the relevant CLO Trustee to pay, on each Payment Date, the 

Payment to Issuers’ Counsel, allocated in the proportion set forth in such 

agreement; provided, however, that (x) if the Management Fees are insufficient to 

make any Payment in full on a Payment Date, such shortfall, in addition to any 

other amounts due hereunder, shall be paid out of the Management Fees owed on 

the following Payment Date, and (y) nothing herein shall limit either Debtor’s 

liability to pay the amounts set forth herein, nor the recourse of the Issuers or 

Issuers’ Counsel to the Debtor, in the event of any failure to make any Payment. 

S. Release of Issuer Claims. Effective as of the Confirmation Date, and to 

the maximum extent permitted by law, each Issuer on behalf of itself and each of its current and 

former advisors, trustees, directors, officers, managers, members, partners, employees, 

beneficiaries, shareholders, agents, participants, subsidiaries, parents, successors, designees, and 

12 The “Issuers” are: Brentwood CLO, Ltd., Gleneagles CLO, Ltd., Greenbriar CLO, Ltd., Highland CLO 2018-1, 

Ltd., Highland Legacy Limited, Highland Loan Funding V Ltd., Highland Park CDO I, Ltd., Pam Capital Funding 

LP, Rockwall CDO II Ltd., Rockwall CDO Ltd., Southfork CLO Ltd., Stratford CLO Ltd., Westchester CLO, Ltd., 

Aberdeen Loan Funding, Ltd., Eastland CLO, Ltd., Grayson CLO, Ltd., Highland Credit Opportunities CDO Ltd., 

Jasper CLO, Ltd., Liberty Cayman Holdings, Ltd., Liberty CLO, Ltd., Red River CLO, Ltd., Valhalla CLO, Ltd. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 70 of 161

Appx. 0090

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 71 of 162 PageID 144

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 71 of 162

000175

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 144 of 235 PageID 237
 71 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

assigns hereby forever, finally, fully, unconditionally, and completely releases, relieves, acquits, 

remises, and exonerates, and covenants never to sue, (i) the Debtor and (ii) the Professionals 

retained by the Debtor and the Committee in the Chapter 11 Case, the Independent Directors, the 

CEO/CRO, and with respect to the Persons listed in this subsection (ii), such Person’s Related 

Persons (collectively, the “Debtor Released Parties”), for and from any and all claims, debts, 

liabilities, demands, obligations, promises, acts, agreements, liens, losses, costs and expenses 

(including, without limitation, attorney’s fees and related costs), damages, injuries, suits, actions, 

and causes of action of whatever kind or nature, whether known or unknown, suspected or 

unsuspected, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, contingent or fixed, at law or in 

equity, statutory or otherwise, including, without limitation, any claims, defenses, and affirmative 

defenses, whether known or unknown, including, without limitation, those which were or could 

have been asserted in, in connection with, or with respect to the Bankruptcy Case (collectively, the 

“Issuer Released Claims”). 

T. Release of Debtor Claims against Issuer Released Parties. Upon entry 

of this Order, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, the Debtor hereby forever, finally, 

fully, unconditionally, and completely releases, relieves, acquits, remises, and exonerates, and 

covenants never to sue [(i) each Issuer and (ii) Wendy Ebanks, (iii) Yun Zheng, (iv) Laura 

Chisholm, (v) Mora Goddard, (vi) Stacy Bodden, (vii) Suzan Merren (viii) Scott Dakers, (ix) Samit 

Ghosh, (x) Inderjit Singh, (xi) Ellen Christian, (xii) Andrew Dean, (xiii) Betsy Mortel, (xiv) David 

Hogan, (xv) Cleveland Stewart, (xvi) Rachael Rankin, (xvii) Otelia Scott, (xviii) Martin Couch, 

(xx) Ferona Bartley-Davis, (xxi) Charlotte Cloete, (xxii) Christina McLean, (xxiii) Karen Ellerbe, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 71 of 161

Appx. 0091

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 72 of 162 PageID 145

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 72 of 162

000176

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 145 of 235 PageID 238
 72 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

(xxiv) Gennie Kay Bigord, (xxv) Evert Brunekreef, (xxvii) Evan Charles Burtton (collectively, 

the “Issuer Released Parties”),] for and from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, 

obligations, promises, acts, agreements, liens, losses, costs and expenses (including, without 

limitation, attorney’s fees and related costs), damages, injuries, suits, actions, and causes of action 

of whatever kind or nature, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, matured or 

unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, contingent or fixed, at law or in equity, statutory or 

otherwise, including, without limitation, any claims, defenses, and affirmative defenses, whether 

known or unknown, which were or could have been asserted in, in connection with, or with respect 

to the Bankruptcy Case (collectively, the “Debtor Released Claims”); provided, however, that 

notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the release contained herein will apply to the 

Issuer Released Parties set forth in subsection (ii) above only with respect to Debtor Released 

Claims arising from or relating to the Issuer Executory Contracts. Notwithstanding anything in 

this Order to the contrary, the releases set forth in paragraphs S and T hereof will not apply with 

respect to the duties, rights, or obligations of the Debtor or any Issuer hereunder. 

U. Authorization to Consummate. The Debtor is authorized to consummate 

the Plan after the entry of this Confirmation Order subject to satisfaction or waiver of the 

conditions precedent to the Effective Date of the Plan set forth in Article VIII.A of the Plan. The 

Plan shall not become effective unless and until the conditions set forth in Article VIII.A of the 

Plan have been satisfied, or otherwise waived pursuant to Article VIII.B of the Plan. 

V. Professional Compensation. All requests for payment of Professional Fee 

Claims for services rendered and reimbursement of expenses incurred prior to the Effective Date 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 72 of 161

Appx. 0092

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 73 of 162 PageID 146

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 73 of 162

000177

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 146 of 235 PageID 239
 73 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

must be filed no later than sixty (60) days after the Effective Date. The Bankruptcy Court shall 

determine the Allowed amounts of such Professional Fee Claims after notice and an opportunity 

for hearing in accordance with the procedures established by the Bankruptcy Code and the 

Bankruptcy Court. The Debtor shall fund the Professional Fee Reserve as provided under the Plan. 

The Reorganized Debtor shall pay Professional Fee Claims in Cash in the amounts the Bankruptcy 

Court allows. The Debtor is authorized to pay the pre-Effective Date fees and expenses of all 

ordinary course professionals in the ordinary course of business without the need for further 

Bankruptcy Court order or approval. From and after the Effective Date, any requirement that 

Professionals comply with sections 327 through 331 and 1103 (if applicable) of the Bankruptcy 

Code in seeking retention or compensation for services rendered after such date shall terminate, 

and the Reorganized Debtor or Claimant Trustee, as applicable, may employ and pay any 

Professional or Entity employed in the ordinary course of the Debtor’s business without any further 

notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court. 

W. Release, Exculpation, Discharge, and Injunction Provisions. The 

following release, exculpation, discharge, and injunction provisions set forth in the Plan are 

approved and authorized in their entirety, and such provisions are effective and binding on 

all parties and Entities to the extent provided therein. 

X. Discharge of Claims and Termination of Interests. To the fullest extent 

provided under section 1141(d)(1)(A) and other applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, 

except as otherwise expressly provided by the Plan or this Confirmation Order, all consideration 

distributed under the Plan will be in exchange for, and in complete satisfaction, settlement, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 73 of 161

Appx. 0093

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 74 of 162 PageID 147

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 74 of 162

000178

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 147 of 235 PageID 240
 74 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

discharge, and release of, all Claims and Equity Interests of any kind or nature whatsoever against 

the Debtor or any of its Assets or properties, and regardless of whether any property will have been 

distributed or retained pursuant to the Plan on account of such Claims or Equity Interests. Except 

as otherwise expressly provided by the Plan or this Confirmation Order, upon the Effective Date, 

the Debtor and its Estate will be deemed discharged and released under and to the fullest extent 

provided under section 1141(d)(1)(A) and other applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code 

from any and all Claims and Equity Interests of any kind or nature whatsoever, including, but not 

limited to, demands and liabilities that arose before the Confirmation Date, and all debts of the 

kind specified in section 502(g), 502(h), or 502(i) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

Y. Exculpation. Subject in all respects to Article XII.D of the Plan, to the 

maximum extent permitted by applicable law, no Exculpated Party will have or incur, and each 

Exculpated Party is hereby exculpated from, any claim, obligation, suit, judgment, damage, 

demand, debt, right, Cause of Action, remedy, loss, and liability for conduct occurring on or after 

the Petition Date in connection with or arising out of (i) the filing and administration of the Chapter 

11 Case; (ii) the negotiation and pursuit of the Disclosure Statement, the Plan, or the solicitation 

of votes for, or confirmation of, the Plan; (iii) the funding or consummation of the Plan (including 

the Plan Supplement) or any related agreements, instruments, or other documents, the solicitation 

of votes on the Plan, the offer, issuance, and Plan Distribution of any securities issued or to be 

issued pursuant to the Plan, including the Claimant Trust Interests, whether or not such Plan 

Distributions occur following the Effective Date; (iv) the implementation of the Plan; and (v) any 

negotiations, transactions, and documentation in connection with the foregoing clauses (i)-(v); 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 74 of 161

Appx. 0094

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 75 of 162 PageID 148

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 75 of 162

000179

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 148 of 235 PageID 241
 75 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

provided, however, the foregoing will not apply to (a) any acts or omissions of an Exculpated Party 

arising out of or related to acts or omissions that constitute bad faith, fraud, gross negligence, 

criminal misconduct, or willful misconduct or (b) Strand or any Employee other than with respect 

to actions taken by such Entities from the date of appointment of the Independent Directors through 

the Effective Date. The Plan’s exculpation shall be in addition to, and not in limitation of, all other 

releases, indemnities, exculpations, any other applicable law or rules, or any other provisions of 

the Plan, including Article IV.C.2 of the Plan, protecting such Exculpated Parties from liability. 

Z. Releases by the Debtor. On and after the Effective Date, each Released 

Party is deemed to be, hereby conclusively, absolutely, unconditionally, irrevocably, and forever 

released and discharged by the Debtor and the Estate, in each case on behalf of themselves and 

their respective successors, assigns, and representatives, including, but not limited to, the Claimant 

Trust and the Litigation Sub-Trust from any and all Causes of Action, including any derivative 

claims, asserted on behalf of the Debtor, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, 

matured or unmatured, existing or hereafter arising, in law, equity, contract, tort or otherwise, that 

the Debtor or the Estate would have been legally entitled to assert in their own right (whether 

individually or collectively) or on behalf of the holder of any Claim against, or Interest in, a Debtor 

or other Person. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the foregoing release 

does not release: (i) any obligations of any party under the Plan or any document, instrument, or 

agreement executed to implement the Plan, (ii) the rights or obligations of any current employee 

of the Debtor under any employment agreement or plan, (iii) the rights of the Debtor with respect 

to any confidentiality provisions or covenants restricting competition in favor of the Debtor under 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 75 of 161

Appx. 0095

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 76 of 162 PageID 149

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 76 of 162

000180

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 149 of 235 PageID 242
 76 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

any employment agreement with a current or former employee of the Debtor, (iv) any Avoidance 

Actions, or (v) any Causes of Action arising from willful misconduct, criminal misconduct, actual 

fraud, or gross negligence of such applicable Released Party as determined by Final Order of the 

Bankruptcy Court or any other court of competent jurisdiction. 

AA. Injunction. Upon entry of this Confirmation Order, all Enjoined 

Parties are and shall be permanently enjoined, on and after the Effective Date, from taking 

any actions to interfere with the implementation or consummation of the Plan. Except as 

expressly provided in the Plan, this Confirmation Order, or a separate order of the 

Bankruptcy Court, all Enjoined Parties are and shall be permanently enjoined, on and after 

the Effective Date, with respect to any Claims and Equity Interests, from directly or 

indirectly (i) commencing, conducting, or continuing in any manner, any suit, action, or 

other proceeding of any kind (including any proceeding in a judicial, arbitral, administrative 

or other forum) against or affecting the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (ii) enforcing, 

levying, attaching (including any prejudgment attachment), collecting, or otherwise 

recovering, enforcing, or attempting to recover or enforce, by any manner or means, any 

judgment, award, decree, or order against the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (iii) 

creating, perfecting, or otherwise enforcing in any manner, any security interest, lien or 

encumbrance of any kind against the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (iv) asserting any 

right of setoff, directly or indirectly, against any obligation due to the Debtor or against

property or interests in property of the Debtor, except to the limited extent permitted under 

Sections 553 and 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code, and (v) acting or proceeding in any manner, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 76 of 161

Appx. 0096

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 77 of 162 PageID 150

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 77 of 162

000181

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 150 of 235 PageID 243
 77 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

in any place whatsoever, that does not conform to or comply with the provisions of the Plan. 

The injunctions set forth in the Plan and this Confirmation Order shall extend to, and apply 

to any act of the type set forth in any of clauses (i)-(v) of the immediately preceding 

paragraph against any successors of the Debtor, including, but not limited to, the 

Reorganized Debtor, the Litigation Sub-Trust, and the Claimant Trust and their respective 

property and interests in property. Subject in all respects to Article XII.D of the Plan, no 

Enjoined Party may commence or pursue a claim or cause of action of any kind against any 

Protected Party that arose or arises from or is related to the Chapter 11 Case, the negotiation 

of the Plan, the administration of the Plan or property to be distributed under the Plan, the 

wind down of the business of the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, the administration of the 

Claimant Trust or the Litigation Sub-Trust, or the transactions in furtherance of the 

foregoing without the Bankruptcy Court (i) first determining, after notice and a hearing, 

that such claim or cause of action represents a colorable claim of any kind, including, but 

not limited to, negligence, bad faith, criminal misconduct, willful misconduct, fraud, or gross 

negligence against a Protected Party and (ii) specifically authorizing such Enjoined Party to 

bring such claim or cause of action against any such Protected Party; provided, however, the 

foregoing will not apply to a claim or cause of action against Strand or against any Employee 

other than with respect to actions taken, respectively, by Strand or by such Employee from 

the date of appointment of the Independent Directors through the Effective Date. The 

Bankruptcy Court will have sole and exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether a claim or 

cause of action is colorable and, only to the extent legally permissible and as provided for in 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 77 of 161

Appx. 0097

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 78 of 162 PageID 151

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 78 of 162

000182

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 151 of 235 PageID 244
 78 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Article XI of the Plan, shall have jurisdiction to adjudicate the underlying colorable claim or 

cause of action. 

BB. Duration of Injunction and Stays. Unless otherwise provided in the 

Plan, in this Confirmation Order, or in a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court, (i) all 

injunctions and stays entered during the Chapter 11 Case and in existence on the 

Confirmation Date, shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms; and 

(ii) the automatic stay arising under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code shall remain in full 

force and effect subject to Section 362(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, and to the extent necessary 

if the Debtor does not receive a discharge, the Bankruptcy Court will enter an equivalent 

order under Section 105.

CC. Continuance of January 9 Order and July 16 Order. Unless otherwise 

provided in the Plan, in this Confirmation Order, or in a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court, each 

of the Order Approving Settlement with Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Regarding 

Governance of the Debtor and Procedures for Operations in the Ordinary Course, entered by the 

Bankruptcy Court on January 9, 2020 [Docket No. 339] and Order Approving the Debtor’s Motion 

Under Bankruptcy Code Sections 105(a) and 363(b) Authorizing Retention of James P. Seery, Jr., 

as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Restructuring Officer, and Foreign Representative Nunc Pro 

Tunc to March 15, 2020 [Docket No. 854] entered on July 16, 2020 shall remain in full force and 

effect from the Confirmation Date and following the Effective Date. 

DD. No Governmental Releases. Nothing in this Confirmation Order or the 

Plan shall effect a release of any claim by the United States Government or any of its agencies or 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 78 of 161

Appx. 0098

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 79 of 162 PageID 152

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 79 of 162

000183

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 152 of 235 PageID 245
 79 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

any state and local authority whatsoever, including without limitation any claim arising under the 

Internal Revenue Code, the environmental laws or any criminal laws of the United States or any 

state and local authority against any party or person, nor shall anything in this Confirmation Order 

or the Plan enjoin the United States or any state or local authority from bringing any claim, suit, 

action, or other proceedings against any party or person for any liability of such persons whatever, 

including without limitation any claim, suit, or action arising under the Internal Revenue Code, 

the environmental laws or any criminal laws of the United States or any state and local authority 

against such persons, nor shall anything in this Confirmation Order or the Plan exculpate any party 

or person from any liability to the United States Government or any of its agencies or any state 

and local authority whatsoever, including any liabilities arising under the Internal Revenue Code, 

the environmental laws, or any criminal laws of the United States or any state and local authority 

against any party or person.

EE. Exemption from Transfer Taxes. Pursuant to section 1146(a) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, any transfers (whether from the Debtor to the Reorganized Debtor or to any 

other Person) of property under the Plan or pursuant to: (a) the issuance, distribution, transfer, or 

exchange of any debt, equity security, or other interest in the Debtor or the Reorganized Debtor; 

(b) the Restructuring transactions pursuant to the Plan; (c) the creation, modification, 

consolidation, termination, refinancing, and/or recording of any mortgage, deed of trust, or other 

security interest, or the securing of additional indebtedness by such or other means; (d) the making, 

assignment, or recording of any lease or sublease; or (e) the making, delivery, or recording of any 

deed or other instrument of transfer under, in furtherance of, or in connection with, the Plan, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 79 of 161

Appx. 0099

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 80 of 162 PageID 153

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 80 of 162

000184

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 153 of 235 PageID 246
 80 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

including any deeds, bills of sale, assignments, or other instrument of transfer executed in 

connection with any transaction arising out of, contemplated by, or in any way related to the Plan, 

shall not be subject to any document recording tax, stamp tax, conveyance fee, intangibles or 

similar tax, mortgage tax, real estate transfer tax, mortgage recording tax, Uniform Commercial 

Code filing or recording fee, regulatory filing or recording fee, or other similar tax or governmental 

assessment to the fullest extent contemplated by section 1146(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, and upon 

entry of this Confirmation Order, the appropriate state or local governmental officials or agents 

shall forego the collection of any such tax or governmental assessment and accept for filing and 

recordation of any of the foregoing instruments or other documents without the payment of any 

such tax, recordation fee, or governmental assessment. 

FF. Cancellation of Notes, Certificates and Instruments. Except for the 

purpose of evidencing a right to a distribution under the Plan and except as otherwise set forth in 

the Plan or as otherwise provided in this Confirmation Order, on the Effective Date, all agreements, 

instruments, Securities and other documents evidencing any prepetition Claim or Equity Interest 

and any rights of any Holder in respect thereof shall be deemed cancelled, discharged, and of no 

force or effect. The holders of or parties to such cancelled instruments, Securities, and other 

documentation will have no rights arising from or related to such instruments, Securities, or other 

documentation or the cancellation thereof, except the rights provided for pursuant to the Plan, and 

the obligations of the Debtor thereunder or in any way related thereto will be fully released, 

terminated, extinguished and discharged, in each case without further notice to or order of the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 80 of 161

Appx. 0100

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 81 of 162 PageID 154

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 81 of 162

000185

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 154 of 235 PageID 247
 81 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Bankruptcy Court, act or action under applicable law, regulation, order, or rule or any requirement 

of further action, vote or other approval or authorization by any Person. 

GG. Documents, Mortgages, and Instruments. Each federal, state, 

commonwealth, local, foreign, or other governmental agency is authorized to accept any and all 

documents, mortgages, and instruments necessary or appropriate to effectuate, implement, or 

consummate the Plan, including the Restructuring transactions contemplated under the Plan, and 

this Confirmation Order. 

HH. Post-Confirmation Modifications. Subject section 1127(b) of the 

Bankruptcy Code and the Plan, the Debtor and the Reorganized Debtor expressly reserve their 

rights to revoke or withdraw, or to alter, amend, or modify materially the Plan, one or more times 

after Confirmation and, to the extent necessary, may initiate proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court 

to so alter, amend, or modify the Plan, or remedy any defect or omission, or reconcile any 

inconsistencies in the Plan or this Confirmation Order, in such manner as may be necessary to 

carry out the purposes and intent of the Plan. Any such modification or supplement shall be 

considered a modification of the Plan and shall be made in accordance with Article XII.B of the 

Plan. 

II. Applicable Nonbankruptcy Law. The provisions of this Confirmation 

Order, the Plan and related documents, or any amendments or modifications thereto, shall apply 

and be enforceable notwithstanding any otherwise applicable nonbankruptcy law. 

JJ. Governmental Approvals Not Required. This Confirmation Order shall 

constitute all approvals and consents required, if any, by the laws, rules, or regulations of any state, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 81 of 161

Appx. 0101

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 82 of 162 PageID 155

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 82 of 162

000186

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 155 of 235 PageID 248
 82 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

federal, or other governmental authority with respect to the dissemination, implementation, or 

consummation of the Plan and the Disclosure Statement, any certifications, documents, 

instruments or agreements, and any amendments or modifications thereto, and any other acts 

referred to in, or contemplated by, the Plan and the Disclosure Statement. 

KK. Notice of Effective Date. As soon as reasonably practicable after the 

Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtor shall file notice of the Effective Date and shall serve a 

copy of the same on all Holders of Claims and Equity Interests, and all parties who have filed with 

the Bankruptcy Court requests to receive notices in accordance with Bankruptcy Rules 2002 and 

3020(c). Notwithstanding the above, no notice of Confirmation or Consummation or service of 

any kind shall be required to be mailed or made upon any Entity to whom the Debtor mailed notice 

of the Confirmation Hearing, but received such notice returned marked “undeliverable as 

addressed,” “moved, left no forwarding address” or “forwarding order expired,” or similar reason, 

unless the Debtor has been informed in writing by such Entity, or is otherwise aware, of that 

Entity’s new address. The above-referenced notices are adequate under the particular 

circumstances of this Chapter 11 Case and no other or further notice is necessary. 

LL. Substantial Consummation. On the Effective Date, the Plan shall be 

deemed to be substantially consummated under sections 1101 and 1127 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

MM. Waiver of Stay. For good cause shown, the stay of this Confirmation Order 

provided by any Bankruptcy Rule is waived, and this Confirmation Order shall be effective and 

enforceable immediately upon its entry by the Bankruptcy Court. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 82 of 161

Appx. 0102

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 83 of 162 PageID 156

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 83 of 162

000187

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 156 of 235 PageID 249
 83 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

NN. References to and Omissions of Plan Provisions. References to articles, 

sections, and provisions of the Plan are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not 

intended to be a part of or to affect the interpretation of the Plan. The failure to specifically include 

or to refer to any particular article, section, or provision of the Plan in this Confirmation Order 

shall not diminish or impair the effectiveness of such article, section, or provision, it being the 

intent of the Bankruptcy Court that the Plan be confirmed in its entirety, except as expressly 

modified herein, and incorporated herein by this reference. 

OO. Headings. Headings utilized herein are for convenience and reference only, 

and do not constitute a part of the Plan or this Confirmation Order for any other purpose. 

PP. Effect of Conflict. This Confirmation Order supersedes any Bankruptcy 

Court order issued prior to the Confirmation Date that may be inconsistent with this Confirmation 

Order. If there is any inconsistency between the terms of the Plan and the terms of this 

Confirmation Order, the terms of this Confirmation Order govern and control. If there is any 

inconsistency between the terms of this Confirmation Order and the terms of a final, executed Plan 

Supplement Document, the terms of the final, executed Plan Supplement Document will govern 

and control. 

QQ. Resolution of Objection of Texas Taxing Authorities. Dallas County, 

Kaufman County, City of Allen, Allen ISD and City of Richardson (collectively, the “Tax 

Authorities”) assert that they are the holders of prepetition and administrative expense claims for 

2019, 2020 and 2021 ad valorem real and business personal property taxes. The ad valorem 

property taxes for tax year 2020 shall be paid in accordance with and to the extent required under 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 83 of 161

Appx. 0103

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 84 of 162 PageID 157

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 84 of 162

000188

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 157 of 235 PageID 250
 84 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

applicable nonbankruptcy law. In the event the 2020 taxes are paid after February 1, 2021, the 

Tax Authorities may assert any rights and amounts they claim are owed with respect to penalties 

and interest that have accrued through the date of payment and the Debtor and Reorganized Debtor 

reserve any all rights and defenses in connection therewith. 

a. The Debtor/Reorganized Debtor shall pay all amounts owed to the Tax Authorities

for tax year 2021 in accordance with and to the extent required under applicable 

nonbankruptcy law. The Tax Authorities shall not be required to file and serve an 

administrative expense claim and request for payment as a condition of allowance 

of their administrative expense claims pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 503(b)(1)(D). 

With regard to year 2019 ad valorem property taxes, the Tax Authorities will 

receive payment of their prepetition claims within 30 days of the Effective Date of 

the Plan. The payment will include interest from the Petition Date through the 

Effective Date and from the Effective Date through payment in full at the state 

statutory rate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections 506(b), 511, and 1129, if applicable, 

subject to all of the Debtor’s and Reorganized Debtor’s rights and defenses in 

connection therewith. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, the Tax 

Authorities shall (i) retain the liens that secure all prepetition and postpetition 

amounts ultimately owed to them, if any, as well as (ii) the state law priority of 

those liens until the claims are paid in full. 

b. The Tax Authorities’ prepetition claims and their administrative expense claims 

shall not be discharged until such time as the amounts owed are paid in full. In the 

event of a default asserted by the Taxing Authorities, the Tax Authorities shall 

provide notice Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, and may demand cure 

of any such asserted default. Subject to all of its rights and defenses, the Debtor or 

Reorganized Debtor shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of the notice to cure 

the default. If the alleged default is not cured, the Tax Authorities may exercise 

any of their respective rights under applicable law and pursue collection of all 

amounts owed pursuant to state law outside of the Bankruptcy Court, subject in all 

respects to the Debtor’s and Reorganized Debtor’s applicable rights and defenses. 

The Debtor/Reorganized Debtor shall be entitled to any notices of default required 

under applicable nonbankruptcy law and each of the Taxing Authorities, the Debtor 

and the Reorganized Debtor reserve any and all of their respective rights and 

defenses in connection therewith. The Debtor’s and Reorganized Debtor’s rights 

and defenses under Texas Law and the Bankruptcy Code with respect to this 

provision of the Confirmation Order, including their right to dispute or object to the 

Tax Authorities’ Claims and liens, are fully preserved. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 84 of 161

Appx. 0104

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 85 of 162 PageID 158

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 85 of 162

000189

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 158 of 235 PageID 251
 85 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

RR. Resolution of Objections of Scott Ellington and Isaac Leventon. 

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9019(a), the Senior Employees’ Settlement is approved in all 

respects. The Debtor may, only with the consent of the Committee, elect Option B for a Senior 

Employee Claimant by written notice to such Senior Employee Claimant on or before the 

occurrence of the Effective Date. If the Debtor does not elect Option B, then Option A will govern 

the treatment of the Liquidated Bonus Claims. 

a. Notwithstanding any language in the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, or this 

Confirmation Order to the contrary, if Option A applies to the Liquidated Bonus 

Claims of a Senior Employee Claimant, then the Liquidated Bonus Claims of such 

Senior Employee Claimant will receive the treatment described in paragraph 82(e) 

hereof, and if the Debtor timely elects Option B with respect to the Liquidated 

Bonus Claims of a Senior Employee Claimant, then the Liquidated Bonus Claims 

of such Senior Employee will receive the treatment described in paragraph 82(f) 

hereof. 

b. The Senior Employees’ Settlement is hereby approved, without prejudice to the 

respective rights of Mr. Ellington and Mr. Leventon to assert all their remaining 

Claims against the Debtor’s estate, including, but not limited to, their Class 6 PTO 

Claims, their remaining Class 8 General Unsecured Claims, any indemnification 

claims, and any Administrative Expense Claims that they may assert and is without 

prejudice to the rights of any party in interest to object to any such Claims. 

c. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3018(a), Mr. Ellington and Mr. Leventon were 

permitted to change their votes on the Plan. Accordingly, Mr. Ellington’s votes on 

his Ballots in Class 7 and Class 8 of the Plan were changed from a rejection of the 

Plan to acceptance of the Plan, and Mr. Leventon’s votes on his Ballots in Class 7 

and Class 8 of the Plan were, changed from rejections of the Plan to acceptances of 

the Plan. 

d. The Senior Employees’ Objection is deemed withdrawn. 

SS. No Release of Claims Against Senior Employee Claimants. For the 

avoidance of doubt, the Senior Employees’ Settlement, as approved herein, shall not, and shall not 

be deemed to, release any Claims or Causes of Action held by the Debtor against either Senior 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 85 of 161

Appx. 0105

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 86 of 162 PageID 159

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 86 of 162

000190

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 159 of 235 PageID 252
 86 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Employee Claimant nor shall either Senior Employee Claimant be, or be deemed to be, a “Released 

Party” under the Plan. 

TT. Resolution of Objection of Internal Revenue Service. Notwithstanding 

any other provision or term of the Plan or Confirmation Order, the following Default Provision 

shall control as to the United States of America, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and all of its 

claims, including any administrative claim (the “IRS Claim”): 

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, if the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, 

or any successor in interest fails to pay when due any payment required to be made on 

federal taxes, the IRS Claim, or other payment required to be made to the IRS under the 

terms and provisions of this Plan, the Confirmation Order, or the Internal Revenue Code 

(26 U.S.C.), or fails to timely file any required federal tax return, or if any other event of 

default as set forth in the Plan occurs, the IRS shall be entitled to give the Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor and/or any successor in interest and their counsel of record, by United 

States Certified Mail, written notice of the failure and/or default with demand that it be 

cured, and if the failure and/or default is not cured within 14 days of the date of said notice 

and demand, then the following shall apply to the IRS: 

(1) The administrative collection powers and the rights of the IRS shall 

be reinstated as they existed prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition, 

including, but not limited to, the assessment of taxes, the filing of a notice 

of Federal tax lien and the powers of levy, seizure, and collection as 

provided under the Internal Revenue Code; 

(2) The automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362 and any injunction of the 

Plan or in the Confirmation Order shall, with regard to the IRS only, lift or 

terminate without further notice or hearing by the Bankruptcy Court, and 

the entire prepetition liability owed to the IRS, together with any unpaid 

postpetition tax liabilities, may become due and payable immediately; and 

(3) The IRS shall have the right to proceed to collect from the Debtor, 

the Reorganized Debtor or any successor in interest any of the prepetition 

tax liabilities and related penalties and interest through administrative or 

judicial collection procedures available under the United States Code as if 

no bankruptcy petition had been filed and as if no plan had been confirmed. 

(b) If the IRS declares the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or any successor-in-interest to 

be in default of the Debtor’s, the Reorganized Debtor’s and/ or any successor- in-interest’s 

obligations under the Plan, then entire prepetition liability of an IRS’ Allowed Claim, 

together with any unpaid postpetition tax liabilities shall become due and payable 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 86 of 161

Appx. 0106

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 87 of 162 PageID 160

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 87 of 162

000191

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 160 of 235 PageID 253
 87 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

immediately upon written demand to the Debtor, Reorganized Debtor and/or any 

successor-in-interest. Failure of the IRS to declare a failure and/or default does not 

constitute a waiver by the United States or its agency the IRS of the right to declare that 

the Debtor, Reorganized Debtor, and/or any successor in interest is in default. 

(c) The IRS shall only be required to send two notices of failure and/or default, and upon 

the third event of a failure and/or default, the IRS shall be entitled to proceed as set out in 

paragraphs (1), (2), and/or (3) herein above without further notice to the Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor, or any successor in interest, or its counsel. The collection statute 

expiration date for all unpaid federal tax liabilities shall be extended pursuant to nonbankruptcy law. 

(d) The Internal Revenue Service shall not be bound by any release provisions in the Plan 

that would release any liability of the responsible persons of the Debtor, the Reorganized 

Debtor, and/or any successor in interest to the IRS. The Internal Revenue Service may 

take such actions as it deems necessary to assess any liability that may be due and owing 

by the responsible persons of the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor and/or any successor in 

interest to the Internal Revenue Service. 

(e) Nothing contained in the Plan or the Confirmation Order shall be deemed to be a waiver 

or relinquishment of any rights, claims, causes of action, rights of setoff or recoupment, 

rights to appeal tax assessments, or other legal or equitable defenses that the Debtor or 

Reorganized Debtor have under non-bankruptcy law in connection with any claim, liability 

or cause of action of the United States and its agency the Internal Revenue Service. 

(f) The term “any payment required to be made on federal taxes,” as used herein above, is 

defined as: any payment or deposit required by the Internal Revenue Code to be made by 

the Debtor from and after the Confirmation Date, or the Reorganized Debtor and/or any 

successor in interest from and after the Effective Date, to the date the IRS Claim is together 

with interest paid in full. The term “any required tax return,” as used herein above, is 

defined as: any tax return or report required by the Internal Revenue Code to be made by 

the Debtor from and after the Confirmation Date, or the Reorganized Debtor and/or any 

successor in interest from and after the Effective Date, to the date the IRS Claim is together 

with interest paid in full. 

UU. IRS Proof of Claim. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or in this 

Confirmation Order, until all required tax returns are filed with and processed by the IRS, the IRS’s 

proof of claim will not be deemed fixed for purposes of Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code and 

may be amended in order to reflect the IRS’ assessment of the Debtor’s unpaid priority and general 

unsecured taxes, penalties and interest. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 87 of 161

Appx. 0107

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 88 of 162 PageID 161

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 88 of 162

000192

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 161 of 235 PageID 254
 88 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

VV. CLO Holdco, Ltd. Settlement Notwithstanding anything contained 

herein to the contrary, nothing in this Order is or is intended to supersede the rights and obligations 

of either the Debtor or CLO Holdco contained in that certain Settlement Agreement between CLO 

Holdco, Ltd., and Highland Capital Management, L.P., dated January 25,2021 [Docket No. 1838-

1] (the “CLOH Settlement Agreement”). In the event of any conflict between the terms of this 

Order and the terms of the CLOH Settlement Agreement, the terms of the CLOH Settlement 

Agreement will govern. 

WW. Retention of Jurisdiction. The Bankruptcy Court may properly, and upon 

the Effective Date shall, to the maximum extent permitted under applicable law, retain jurisdiction 

over all matters arising out of, and related to, this Chapter 11 Case, including the matters set forth 

in Article XI of the Plan and section 1142 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

XX. Payment of Statutory Fees; Filing of Quarterly Reports. All fees 

payable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930 shall be paid on or before the Effective Date. The 

Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trust, and the Litigation Sub-Trust shall be jointly and severally 

liable for payment of quarterly fees to the Office of the United States Trustee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1930 through the entry of the Final Decree for the Debtor or the dismissal or conversion of the 

Chapter 11 Case. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, the U.S. Trustee shall not 

be required to file any proofs of claim with respect to quarterly fees payable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1930. 

YY. Dissolution of the Committee. On the Effective Date, the Committee will 

dissolve, and the members of the Committee and the Committee’s Professionals will cease to have 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 88 of 161

Appx. 0108

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 89 of 162 PageID 162

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 89 of 162

000193

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 162 of 235 PageID 255
 89 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

any role arising from or relating to the Chapter 11 Case, except in connection with final fee 

applications of Professionals for services rendered prior to the Effective Date (including the right 

to object thereto). Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Committee member or Professional may 

serve following the Effective Date with respect to the Claimant Trust Oversight Board or Litigation 

Sub-Trust. The Professionals retained by the Committee and the members thereof will not be 

entitled to assert any fee claims for any services rendered to the Committee or expenses incurred 

in the service of the Committee after the Effective Date, except for reasonable fees for services 

rendered, and actual and necessary costs incurred, in connection with any applications for 

allowance of Professional Fees pending on the Effective Date or filed and served after the Effective 

Date pursuant to the Plan. Nothing in the Plan shall prohibit or limit the ability of the Debtor’s or 

Committee’s Professionals to represent either of the Trustees or to be compensated or reimbursed 

per the Plan, the Claimant Trust Agreement, and/or Litigation Sub-Trust in connection with such 

representation. 

ZZ. Miscellaneous. After the Effective Date, the Debtor or Reorganized 

Debtor, as applicable, shall have no obligation to file with the Bankruptcy Court or serve on any 

parties reports that the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, were obligated to file under 

the Bankruptcy Code or a court order, including monthly operating reports (even for those periods 

for which a monthly operating report was not filed before the Effective Date), ordinary course 

professional reports, reports to any parties otherwise required under the “first” and “second” day 

orders entered in this Chapter 11 Case (including any cash collateral financing orders entered in 

this Chapter 11 Case) and monthly or quarterly reports for Professionals; provided, however, that 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 89 of 161

Appx. 0109

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 90 of 162 PageID 163

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 90 of 162

000194

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 163 of 235 PageID 256
 90 

DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, will comply with the U.S. Trustee’s post 

confirmation reporting requirements. 

###END OF ORDER###

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 90 of 161

Appx. 0110

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 91 of 162 PageID 164

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 91 of 162

000195

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 164 of 235 PageID 257
DOCS_SF:104487.21 36027/002

Exhibit A 

Fifth Amended Plan (as Modified) 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 91 of 161

Appx. 0111

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 92 of 162 PageID 165

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 92 of 162

000196

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 165 of 235 PageID 258
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.,1

Debtor. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Chapter 11 

Case No. 19-34054-sgj11 

FIFTH AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION OF HIGHLAND 

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. (AS MODIFIED) 

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No.143717) 

Ira D. Kharasch (CA Bar No. 109084) 

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992) 

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com 

 ikharasch@pszjlaw.com 

 gdemo@pszjlaw.com 

HAYWARD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 

Melissa S. Hayward (TX Bar No. 24044908) 

Zachery Z. Annable (TX Bar No. 24053075) 

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106 

Dallas, TX 75231 

Telephone: (972) 755-7100 

Facsimile: (972) 755-7110 

Email: MHayward@HaywardFirm.com 

 ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com: 

Counsel for the Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession 

1

 The Debtor’s last four digits of its taxpayer identification number are (6725). The headquarters and service address 

for the above-captioned Debtor is 300 Crescent Court, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75201. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 92 of 161

Appx. 0112

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 93 of 162 PageID 166

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 93 of 162

000197

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 166 of 235 PageID 259
- i - 

ARTICLE I. RULES OF INTERPRETATION, COMPUTATION OF TIME, 

GOVERNING LAW AND DEFINED TERMS .............................................. 1

A. Rules of Interpretation, Computation of Time and Governing Law ..................... 1

B. Defined Terms ...................................................................................................... 2

ARTICLE II. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS................. 16

A. Administrative Expense Claims .......................................................................... 16

B. Professional Fee Claims ...................................................................................... 17

C. Priority Tax Claims ............................................................................................. 17

ARTICLE III. CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT OF CLASSIFIED CLAIMS 

AND EQUITY INTERESTS ......................................................................... 18

A. Summary ............................................................................................................. 18

B. Summary of Classification and Treatment of Classified Claims and 

Equity Interests ................................................................................................... 18

C. Elimination of Vacant Classes ............................................................................ 19

D. Impaired/Voting Classes ..................................................................................... 19

E. Unimpaired/Non-Voting Classes ........................................................................ 19

F. Impaired/Non-Voting Classes ............................................................................. 19

G. Cramdown ........................................................................................................... 19

H. Classification and Treatment of Claims and Equity Interests ............................. 19

I. Special Provision Governing Unimpaired Claims .............................................. 24

J. Subordinated Claims ........................................................................................... 24

ARTICLE IV. MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN ..................................... 24

A. Summary ............................................................................................................. 24

B. The Claimant Trust ............................................................................................. 25

1. Creation and Governance of the Claimant Trust and Litigation 

Sub-Trust................................................................................................. 25 

2. Claimant Trust Oversight Committee ..................................................... 26 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 93 of 161

Appx. 0113

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 94 of 162 PageID 167

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 94 of 162

000198

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 167 of 235 PageID 260
Page

- ii - 

3. Purpose of the Claimant Trust. ............................................................... 27 

4. Purpose of the Litigation Sub-Trust. ....................................................... 27 

5. Claimant Trust Agreement and Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement. ......... 27 

6. Compensation and Duties of Trustees. ................................................... 29 

7. Cooperation of Debtor and Reorganized Debtor. ................................... 29 

8. United States Federal Income Tax Treatment of the Claimant 

Trust. ....................................................................................................... 29 

9. Tax Reporting. ........................................................................................ 30 

10. Claimant Trust Assets. ............................................................................ 30 

11. Claimant Trust Expenses. ....................................................................... 31 

12. Trust Distributions to Claimant Trust Beneficiaries. .............................. 31 

13. Cash Investments. ................................................................................... 31 

14. Dissolution of the Claimant Trust and Litigation Sub-Trust. ................. 31 

C. The Reorganized Debtor ..................................................................................... 32

1. Corporate Existence ................................................................................ 32 

2. Cancellation of Equity Interests and Release.......................................... 32 

3. Issuance of New Partnership Interests .................................................... 32 

4. Management of the Reorganized Debtor ................................................ 33 

5. Vesting of Assets in the Reorganized Debtor ......................................... 33 

6. Purpose of the Reorganized Debtor ........................................................ 33 

7. Distribution of Proceeds from the Reorganized Debtor Assets; 

Transfer of Reorganized Debtor Assets .................................................. 33 

D. Company Action ................................................................................................. 34

E. Release of Liens, Claims and Equity Interests.................................................... 35

F. Cancellation of Notes, Certificates and Instruments........................................... 35

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 94 of 161

Appx. 0114

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 95 of 162 PageID 168

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 95 of 162

000199

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 168 of 235 PageID 261
Page

- iii - 

G. Cancellation of Existing Instruments Governing Security Interests ................... 35

H. Control Provisions .............................................................................................. 35

I. Treatment of Vacant Classes .............................................................................. 36

J. Plan Documents .................................................................................................. 36

K. Highland Capital Management, L.P. Retirement Plan and Trust ....................... 36

ARTICLE V. TREATMENT OF EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED 

LEASES ......................................................................................................... 37

A. Assumption, Assignment, or Rejection of Executory Contracts and 

Unexpired Leases ................................................................................................ 37

B. Claims Based on Rejection of Executory Contracts or Unexpired 

Leases .................................................................................................................. 38

C. Cure of Defaults for Assumed or Assigned Executory Contracts and 

Unexpired Leases ................................................................................................ 38

ARTICLE VI. PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISTRIBUTIONS ............................................. 39

A. Dates of Distributions ......................................................................................... 39

B. Distribution Agent .............................................................................................. 39

C. Cash Distributions ............................................................................................... 40

D. Disputed Claims Reserve .................................................................................... 40

E. Distributions from the Disputed Claims Reserve ............................................... 40

F. Rounding of Payments ........................................................................................ 40

G. De Minimis Distribution ..................................................................................... 41

H. Distributions on Account of Allowed Claims ..................................................... 41

I. General Distribution Procedures ......................................................................... 41

J. Address for Delivery of Distributions................................................................. 41

K. Undeliverable Distributions and Unclaimed Property ........................................ 41

L. Withholding Taxes .............................................................................................. 42

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 95 of 161

Appx. 0115

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 96 of 162 PageID 169

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 96 of 162

000200

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 169 of 235 PageID 262
Page

- iv - 

M. Setoffs ................................................................................................................. 42

N. Surrender of Cancelled Instruments or Securities .............................................. 42

O. Lost, Stolen, Mutilated or Destroyed Securities ................................................. 43

ARTICLE VII. PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING CONTINGENT, 

UNLIQUIDATED AND DISPUTED CLAIMS ............................................ 43

A. Filing of Proofs of Claim .................................................................................... 43

B. Disputed Claims .................................................................................................. 43

C. Procedures Regarding Disputed Claims or Disputed Equity Interests ............... 43

D. Allowance of Claims and Equity Interests .......................................................... 44

1. Allowance of Claims............................................................................... 44 

2. Estimation ............................................................................................... 44 

3. Disallowance of Claims .......................................................................... 44 

ARTICLE VIII. EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS PLAN ............................................................... 45

A. Conditions Precedent to the Effective Date ........................................................ 45

B. Waiver of Conditions .......................................................................................... 46

C. Dissolution of the Committee ............................................................................. 46

ARTICLE IX. EXCULPATION, INJUNCTION AND RELATED PROVISIONS ................. 47

A. General ................................................................................................................ 47

B. Discharge of Claims ............................................................................................ 47

C. Exculpation ......................................................................................................... 47

D. Releases by the Debtor........................................................................................ 48

E. Preservation of Rights of Action......................................................................... 49

1. Maintenance of Causes of Action ........................................................... 49 

2. Preservation of All Causes of Action Not Expressly Settled or 

Released .................................................................................................. 49 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 96 of 161

Appx. 0116

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 97 of 162 PageID 170

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 97 of 162

000201

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 170 of 235 PageID 263
Page

- v - 

F. Injunction ............................................................................................................ 50

G. Duration of Injunctions and Stays....................................................................... 51

H. Continuance of January 9 Order ......................................................................... 51

ARTICLE X. BINDING NATURE OF PLAN .......................................................................... 51

ARTICLE XI. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION .................................................................... 52

ARTICLE XII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ................................................................. 54

A. Payment of Statutory Fees and Filing of Reports ............................................... 54

B. Modification of Plan ........................................................................................... 54

C. Revocation of Plan .............................................................................................. 54

D. Obligations Not Changed .................................................................................... 55

E. Entire Agreement ................................................................................................ 55

F. Closing of Chapter 11 Case ................................................................................ 55

G. Successors and Assigns....................................................................................... 55

H. Reservation of Rights .......................................................................................... 55

I. Further Assurances.............................................................................................. 56

J. Severability ......................................................................................................... 56

K. Service of Documents ......................................................................................... 56

L. Exemption from Certain Transfer Taxes Pursuant to Section 1146(a) of 

the Bankruptcy Code........................................................................................... 57

M. Governing Law ................................................................................................... 58

N. Tax Reporting and Compliance .......................................................................... 58

O. Exhibits and Schedules ....................................................................................... 58

P. Controlling Document ........................................................................................ 58

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 97 of 161

Appx. 0117

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 98 of 162 PageID 171

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 98 of 162

000202

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 171 of 235 PageID 264
DEBTOR’S CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., as debtor and debtor-in-possession in the 

above-captioned case (the “Debtor”), proposes the following chapter 11 plan of reorganization (the 

“Plan”) for, among other things, the resolution of the outstanding Claims against, and Equity 

Interests in, the Debtor. Unless otherwise noted, capitalized terms used in this Plan have the 

meanings set forth in Article I of this Plan. The Debtor is the proponent of this Plan within the 

meaning of section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

Reference is made to the Disclosure Statement (as such term is defined herein and 

distributed contemporaneously herewith) for a discussion of the Debtor’s history, business, results 

of operations, historical financial information, projections and assets, and for a summary and 

analysis of this Plan and the treatment provided for herein. There also are other agreements and 

documents that may be Filed with the Bankruptcy Court that are referenced in this Plan or the 

Disclosure Statement as Exhibits and Plan Documents. All such Exhibits and Plan Documents are 

incorporated into and are a part of this Plan as if set forth in full herein. Subject to the other 

provisions of this Plan, and in accordance with the requirements set forth in section 1127 of the 

Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 3019, the Debtor reserves the right to alter, amend, modify, 

revoke, or withdraw this Plan prior to the Effective Date. 

If this Plan cannot be confirmed, for any reason, then subject to the terms set forth herein, 

this Plan may be revoked. 

ARTICLE I.

RULES OF INTERPRETATION, COMPUTATION OF TIME, 

GOVERNING LAW AND DEFINED TERMS 

A. Rules of Interpretation, Computation of Time and Governing Law 

For purposes hereof: (a) in the appropriate context, each term, whether stated in the 

singular or the plural, shall include both the singular and the plural, and pronouns stated in the 

masculine, feminine or neuter gender shall include the masculine, feminine and the neuter gender; 

(b) any reference herein to a contract, lease, instrument, release, indenture or other agreement or 

document being in a particular form or on particular terms and conditions means that the referenced 

document, as previously amended, modified or supplemented, if applicable, shall be substantially 

in that form or substantially on those terms and conditions; (c) any reference herein to an existing 

document or exhibit having been Filed or to be Filed shall mean that document or exhibit, as it 

may thereafter be amended, modified or supplemented in accordance with its terms; (d) unless 

otherwise specified, all references herein to “Articles,” “Sections,” “Exhibits” and “Plan 

Documents” are references to Articles, Sections, Exhibits and Plan Documents hereof or hereto; 

(e) unless otherwise stated, the words “herein,” “hereof,” “hereunder” and “hereto” refer to this 

Plan in its entirety rather than to a particular portion of this Plan; (f) captions and headings to 

Articles and Sections are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a 

part of or to affect the interpretation hereof; (g) any reference to an Entity as a Holder of a Claim 

or Equity Interest includes such Entity’s successors and assigns; (h) the rules of construction set 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 98 of 161

Appx. 0118

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 99 of 162 PageID 172

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 99 of 162

000203

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 172 of 235 PageID 265
2 

forth in section 102 of the Bankruptcy Code shall apply; (i) any term used in capitalized form 

herein that is not otherwise defined but that is used in the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy 

Rules shall have the meaning assigned to that term in the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy 

Rules, as the case may be; and (j) “$” or “dollars” means Dollars in lawful currency of the United 

States of America. The provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a) shall apply in computing any 

period of time prescribed or allowed herein. 

B. Defined Terms 

Unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following 

meanings when used in capitalized form herein: 

1. “Acis” means collectively Acis Capital Management, L.P. and Acis Capital 

Management GP, LLP. 

2. “Administrative Expense Claim” means any Claim for costs and expenses 

of administration of the Chapter 11 Case that is Allowed pursuant to sections 503(b), 507(a)(2), 

507(b) or 1114(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, including, without limitation, (a) the actual and 

necessary costs and expenses incurred after the Petition Date and through the Effective Date of 

preserving the Estate and operating the business of the Debtor; and (b) all fees and charges assessed 

against the Estate pursuant to sections 1911 through 1930 of chapter 123 of title 28 of the United 

States Code, and that have not already been paid by the Debtor during the Chapter 11 Case and a 

Professional Fee Claim. 

3. “Administrative Expense Claims Bar Date” means, with respect to any 

Administrative Expense Claim (other than a Professional Fee Claim) becoming due on or prior to 

the Effective Date, 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) on such date that is forty-five days after 

the Effective Date. 

4. “Administrative Expense Claims Objection Deadline” means, with respect 

to any Administrative Expense Claim, the later of (a) ninety (90) days after the Effective Date and 

(b) sixty (60) days after the timely Filing of the applicable request for payment of such 

Administrative Expense Claim; provided, however, that the Administrative Expense Claims 

Objection Deadline may be extended by the Bankruptcy Court upon a motion by the Claimant 

Trustee. 

5. “Affiliate” of any Person means any Entity that, with respect to such Person, 

either (i) is an “affiliate” as defined in section 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, or (ii) is an 

“affiliate” as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, or (iii) directly or indirectly, 

through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, 

such Person. For the purposes of this definition, the term “control” (including, without limitation, 

the terms “controlled by” and “under common control with”) means the possession, directly or 

indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction in any respect of the management or policies 

of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise. 

6. “Allowed” means, with respect to any Claim, except as otherwise provided 

in the Plan: (a) any Claim that is evidenced by a Proof of Claim that has been timely Filed by the 

Bar Date, or that is not required to be evidenced by a Filed Proof of Claim under the Bankruptcy 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 99 of 161

Appx. 0119

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 100 of 162 PageID 173

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 100 of 162

000204

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 173 of 235 PageID 266
3 

Code or a Final Order; (b) a Claim that is listed in the Schedules as not contingent, not unliquidated, 

and not disputed and for which no Proof of Claim has been timely filed; (c) a Claim Allowed 

pursuant to the Plan or an order of the Bankruptcy Court that is not stayed pending appeal; or (d) 

a Claim that is not Disputed (including for which a Proof of Claim has been timely filed in a 

liquidated and noncontingent amount that has not been objected to by the Claims Objection 

Deadline or as to which any such objection has been overruled by Final Order); provided, however,

that with respect to a Claim described in clauses (a) and (b) above, such Claim shall be considered 

Allowed only if and to the extent that, with respect to such Claim, no objection to the allowance 

thereof has been interposed within the applicable period of time fixed by the Plan, the Bankruptcy 

Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, or the Bankruptcy Court, or such an objection is so interposed and 

the Claim shall have been Allowed as set forth above. 

7. “Allowed Claim or Equity Interest” means a Claim or an Equity Interest of 

the type that has been Allowed. 

8. “Assets” means all of the rights, titles, and interest of the Debtor, 

Reorganized Debtor, or Claimant Trust, in and to property of whatever type or nature, including, 

without limitation, real, personal, mixed, intellectual, tangible, and intangible property, the 

Debtor’s books and records, and the Causes of Action. 

9. “Available Cash” means any Cash in excess of the amount needed for the 

Claimant Trust and Reorganized Debtor to maintain business operations as determined in the sole 

discretion of the Claimant Trustee. 

10. “Avoidance Actions” means any and all avoidance, recovery, subordination 

or other actions or remedies that may be brought by and on behalf of the Debtor or its Estate under 

the Bankruptcy Code or applicable nonbankruptcy law, including, without limitation, actions or 

remedies arising under sections 502, 510, 544, 545, and 547-553 of the Bankruptcy Code or under 

similar state or federal statutes and common law, including fraudulent transfer laws 

11. “Ballot” means the form(s) distributed to holders of Impaired Claims or 

Equity Interests entitled to vote on the Plan on which to indicate their acceptance or rejection of 

the Plan. 

12. “Bankruptcy Code” means title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. 

§§ 101-1532, as amended from time to time and as applicable to the Chapter 11 Case. 

13. “Bankruptcy Court” means the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, or any other court having jurisdiction over the 

Chapter 11 Case. 

14. “Bankruptcy Rules” means the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and 

the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for 

the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, in each case as amended from time to time and as 

applicable to the Chapter 11 Case. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 100 of

161

Appx. 0120

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 101 of 162 PageID 174

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 101 of 162

000205

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 174 of 235 PageID 267
4 

15. “Bar Date” means the applicable deadlines set by the Bankruptcy Court for 

the filing of Proofs of Claim against the Debtor as set forth in the Bar Date Order, which deadlines 

may be or have been extended for certain Claimants by order of the Bankruptcy Court. 

16. “Bar Date Order” means the Order (I) Establishing Bar Dates for Filing 

Proofs of Claim and (II) Approving the Form and Manner of Notice Thereof [D.I. 488]. 

17. “Business Day” means any day, other than a Saturday, Sunday or “legal 

holiday” (as defined in Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a)). 

18. “Cash” means the legal tender of the United States of America or the 

equivalent thereof. 

19. “Causes of Action” means any action, claim, cross-claim, third-party claim, 

cause of action, controversy, demand, right, Lien, indemnity, contribution, guaranty, suit, 

obligation, liability, debt, damage, judgment, account, defense, remedy, offset, power, privilege, 

license and franchise of any kind or character whatsoever, in each case whether known, unknown, 

contingent or non-contingent, matured or unmatured, suspected or unsuspected, liquidated or 

unliquidated, disputed or undisputed, foreseen or unforeseen, direct or indirect, choate or inchoate, 

secured or unsecured, assertable directly or derivatively (including, without limitation, under alter 

ego theories), whether arising before, on, or after the Petition Date, in contract or in tort, in law or 

in equity or pursuant to any other theory of law. For the avoidance of doubt, Cause of Action 

includes, without limitation,: (a) any right of setoff, counterclaim or recoupment and any claim for 

breach of contract or for breach of duties imposed by law or in equity; (b) the right to object to 

Claims or Equity Interests; (c) any claim pursuant to section 362 or chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy 

Code; (d) any claim or defense including fraud, mistake, duress and usury, and any other defenses 

set forth in section 558 of the Bankruptcy Code; (e) any claims under any state or foreign law, 

including, without limitation, any fraudulent transfer or similar claims; (f) the Avoidance Actions, 

and (g) the Estate Claims. The Causes of Action include, without limitation, the Causes of Action 

belonging to the Debtor’s Estate listed on the schedule of Causes of Action to be filed with the 

Plan Supplement. 

20. “CEO/CRO” means James P. Seery, Jr., the Debtor’s chief executive officer 

and chief restructuring officer. 

21. “Chapter 11 Case” means the Debtor’s case under chapter 11 of the 

Bankruptcy Code commenced on the Petition Date in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court and 

transferred to the Bankruptcy Court on December 4, 2019, and styled In re Highland Capital 

Management, L.P., Case No. 19-34054-sgj-11. 

22. “Claim” means any “claim” against the Debtor as defined in section 101(5) 

of the Bankruptcy Code. 

23. “Claims Objection Deadline” means the date that is 180 days after the 

Confirmation Date; provided, however, the Claims Objection Deadline may be extended by the 

Bankruptcy Court upon a motion by the Claimant Trustee. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 101 of

161

Appx. 0121

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 102 of 162 PageID 175

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 102 of 162

000206

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 175 of 235 PageID 268
5 

24. “Claimant Trust” means the trust established for the benefit of the Claimant 

Trust Beneficiaries on the Effective Date in accordance with the terms of this Plan and the 

Claimant Trust Agreement. 

25. “Claimant Trust Agreement” means the agreement Filed in the Plan 

Supplement establishing and delineating the terms and conditions of the Claimant Trust. 

26. “Claimant Trust Assets” means (i) other than the Reorganized Debtor 

Assets (which are expressly excluded from this definition), all other Assets of the Estate, including, 

but not limited to, all Causes of Action, Available Cash, any proceeds realized or received from 

such Assets, all rights of setoff, recoupment, and other defenses with respect, relating to, or arising 

from such Assets, (ii) any Assets transferred by the Reorganized Debtor to the Claimant Trust on 

or after the Effective Date, (iii) the limited partnership interests in the Reorganized Debtor, and 

(iv) the ownership interests in New GP LLC. For the avoidance of doubt, any Causes of Action 

that, for any reason, are not capable of being transferred to the Claimant Trust shall constitute 

Reorganized Debtor Assets. 

27. “Claimant Trust Beneficiaries” means the Holders of Allowed General 

Unsecured Claims, Holders of Allowed Subordinated Claims, including, upon Allowance, 

Disputed General Unsecured Claims and Disputed Subordinated Claims that become Allowed 

following the Effective Date, and, only upon certification by the Claimant Trustee that the Holders 

of such Claims have been paid indefeasibly in full plus, to the extent all Allowed unsecured Claims, 

excluding Subordinated Claims, have been paid in full, post-petition interest from the Petition Date 

at the Federal Judgment Rate in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Claimant 

Trust Agreement and all Disputed Claims in Class 8 and Class 9 have been resolved, Holders of 

Allowed Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests, and Holders of Allowed Class A Limited 

Partnership Interests. 

28. “Claimant Trustee” means James P. Seery, Jr., the Debtor’s chief executive 

officer and chief restructuring officer, or such other Person identified in the Plan Supplement who 

will act as the trustee of the Claimant Trust in accordance with the Plan, the Confirmation Order, 

and Claimant Trust Agreement or any replacement trustee pursuant to (and in accordance with) 

the Claimant Trust Agreement. The Claimant Trustee shall be responsible for, among other things, 

monetizing the Estate’s investment assets, resolving Claims (other than those Claims assigned to 

the Litigation Sub-Trust for resolution), and, as the sole officer of New GP LLC, winding down 

the Reorganized Debtor’s business operations. 

29. “Claimant Trust Expenses” means all reasonable legal and other reasonable 

professional fees, costs, and expenses incurred by the Trustees on account of administration of the 

Claimant Trust, including any reasonable administrative fees and expenses, reasonable attorneys’ 

fees and expenses, reasonable insurance costs, taxes, reasonable escrow expenses, and other 

expenses. 

30. “Claimant Trust Interests” means the non-transferable interests in the 

Claimant Trust that are issued to the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries pursuant to this Plan; provided, 

however, Holders of Class A Limited Partnership Interests, Class B Limited Partnership Interests, 

and Class C Limited Partnership Interests will not be deemed to hold Claimant Trust Interests 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 102 of

161

Appx. 0122

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 103 of 162 PageID 176

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 103 of 162

000207

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 176 of 235 PageID 269
6 

unless and until the Contingent Claimant Trust Interests distributed to such Holders vest in 

accordance with the terms of this Plan and the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

31. “Claimant Trust Oversight Committee” means the committee of five 

Persons established pursuant to ARTICLE IV of this Plan to oversee the Claimant Trustee’s 

performance of its duties and otherwise serve the functions described in this Plan and the Claimant 

Trust Agreement. 

32. “Class” means a category of Holders of Claims or Equity Interests as set 

forth in ARTICLE III hereof pursuant to section 1122(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

33. “Class A Limited Partnership Interest” means the Class A Limited 

Partnership Interests as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement held by The Dugaboy 

Investment Trust, Mark and Pamela Okada Family Trust – Exempt Trust 2, Mark and Pamela 

Okada – Exempt Descendants’ Trust, and Mark Kiyoshi Okada, and the General Partner Interest. 

34. “Class B Limited Partnership Interest” means the Class B Limited 

Partnership Interests as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement held by Hunter Mountain 

Investment Trust. 

35. “Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests” means, collectively, the Class B 

Limited Partnership and Class C Limited Partnership Interests. 

36. “Class C Limited Partnership Interest” means the Class C Limited 

Partnership Interests as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement held by Hunter Mountain 

Investment Trust. 

37. “Committee” means the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 

appointed by the U.S. Trustee pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1102(a)(1) on October 29, 2019 [D.I. 65], 

consisting of (i) the Redeemer Committee of Highland Crusader Fund, (ii) Meta-e Discovery, 

(iii) UBS, and (iv) Acis. 

38. “Confirmation Date” means the date on which the clerk of the Bankruptcy 

Court enters the Confirmation Order on the docket of the Bankruptcy Court. 

39. “Confirmation Hearing” means the hearing held by the Bankruptcy Court 

pursuant to section 1128 of the Bankruptcy Code to consider confirmation of this Plan, as such 

hearing may be adjourned or continued from time to time. 

40. “Confirmation Order” means the order of the Bankruptcy Court confirming 

this Plan pursuant to section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

41. “Convenience Claim” means any prepetition, liquidated, and unsecured 

Claim against the Debtor that as of the Confirmation Date is less than or equal to $1,000,000 or 

any General Unsecured Claim that makes the Convenience Class Election. For the avoidance of 

doubt, the Reduced Employee Claims will be Convenience Claims. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 103 of

161

Appx. 0123

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 104 of 162 PageID 177

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 104 of 162

000208

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 177 of 235 PageID 270
7 

42. “Convenience Claim Pool” means the $13,150,000 in Cash that shall be 

available upon the Effective Date for distribution to Holders of Convenience Claims under the 

Plan as set forth herein. Any Cash remaining in the Convenience Claim Pool after all distributions 

on account of Convenience Claims have been made will be transferred to the Claimant Trust and 

administered as a Claimant Trust Asset. 

43. “Convenience Class Election” means the option provided to each Holder of 

a General Unsecured Claim that is a liquidated Claim as of the Confirmation Date on their Ballot 

to elect to reduce their claim to $1,000,000 and receive the treatment provided to Convenience 

Claims. 

44. “Contingent Claimant Trust Interests” means the contingent Claimant Trust 

Interests to be distributed to Holders of Class A Limited Partnership Interests, Holders of Class B 

Limited Partnership Interests, and Holders of Class C Limited Partnership Interests in accordance 

with this Plan, the rights of which shall not vest, and consequently convert to Claimant Trust 

Interests, unless and until the Claimant Trustee Files a certification that all holders of Allowed 

General Unsecured Claims have been paid indefeasibly in full, plus, to the extent all Allowed 

unsecured Claims, excluding Subordinated Claims, have been paid in full, all accrued and unpaid 

post-petition interest from the Petition Date at the Federal Judgment Rate and all Disputed Claims 

in Class 8 and Class 9 have been resolved. As set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement, the 

Contingent Claimant Trust Interests distributed to the Holders of Class A Limited Partnership 

Interests will be subordinated to the Contingent Claimant Trust Interests distributed to the Holders 

of Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests. 

45. “Debtor” means Highland Capital Management, L.P. in its capacity as 

debtor and debtor in possession in the Chapter 11 Case. 

46. “Delaware Bankruptcy Court” means the United States Bankruptcy Court 

for the District of Delaware. 

47. “Disclosure Statement” means that certain Disclosure Statement for 

Debtor’s Fifth Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, as amended, supplemented, or 

modified from time to time, which describes this Plan, including all exhibits and schedules thereto 

and references therein that relate to this Plan. 

48. “Disputed” means with respect to any Claim or Equity Interest, any Claim 

or Equity Interest that is not yet Allowed. 

49. “Disputed Claims Reserve” means the appropriate reserve(s) or account(s) 

to be established on the Initial Distribution Date and maintained by the Claimant Trustee for 

distributions on account of Disputed Claims that may subsequently become an Allowed Claim. 

50. “Disputed Claims Reserve Amount” means, for purposes of determining the 

Disputed Claims Reserve, the Cash that would have otherwise been distributed to a Holder of a 

Disputed Claim at the time any distributions of Cash are made to the Holders of Allowed Claims. 

The amount of the Disputed Claim upon which the Disputed Claims Reserve is calculated shall 

be: (a) the amount set forth on either the Schedules or the filed Proof of Claim, as applicable; (b) 

the amount agreed to by the Holder of the Disputed Claim and the Claimant Trustee or Reorganized 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 104 of

161

Appx. 0124

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 105 of 162 PageID 178

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 105 of 162

000209

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 178 of 235 PageID 271
8 

Debtor, as applicable; (c) the amount ordered by the Bankruptcy Court if it enters an order 

disallowing, in whole or in part, a Disputed Claim; or (d) as otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy 

Court, including an order estimating the Disputed Claim. 

51. “Distribution Agent” means the Claimant Trustee, or any party designated 

by the Claimant Trustee to serve as distribution agent under this Plan. 

52. “Distribution Date” means the date or dates determined by the Reorganized 

Debtor or the Claimant Trustee, as applicable, on or after the Initial Distribution Date upon which 

the Distribution Agent shall make distributions to holders of Allowed Claims and Interests entitled 

to receive distributions under the Plan. 

53. “Distribution Record Date” means the date for determining which Holders 

of Claims and Equity Interests are eligible to receive distributions hereunder, which date shall be 

the Effective Date or such later date determined by the Bankruptcy Court. 

54. “Effective Date” means the Business Day that this Plan becomes effective 

as provided in ARTICLE VIII hereof. 

55. “Employees” means the employees of the Debtor set forth in the Plan 

Supplement. 

56. “Enjoined Parties” means (i) all Entities who have held, hold, or may hold 

Claims against or Equity Interests in the Debtor (whether or not proof of such Claims or Equity 

Interests has been filed and whether or not such Entities vote in favor of, against or abstain from 

voting on the Plan or are presumed to have accepted or deemed to have rejected the Plan), (ii) 

James Dondero (“Dondero”), (iii) any Entity that has appeared and/or filed any motion, objection, 

or other pleading in this Chapter 11 Case regardless of the capacity in which such Entity appeared 

and any other party in interest, (iv) any Related Entity, and (v) the Related Persons of each of the 

foregoing. 

57. “Entity” means any “entity” as defined in section 101(15) of the Bankruptcy 

Code and also includes any Person or any other entity. 

58. “Equity Interest” means any Equity Security in the Debtor, including, 

without limitation, all issued, unissued, authorized or outstanding partnership interests, shares, of 

stock or limited company interests, the Class A Limited Partnership Interests, the Class B Limited 

Partnership Interests, and the Class C Limited Partnership Interests. 

59. “Equity Security” means an “equity security” as defined in section 101(16) 

of the Bankruptcy Code. 

60. “Estate” means the bankruptcy estate of the Debtor created by virtue of 

section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code upon the commencement of the Chapter 11 Case. 

61. “Estate Claims” has the meaning given to it in Exhibit A to the Notice of 

Final Term Sheet [D.I. 354]. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 105 of

161

Appx. 0125

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 106 of 162 PageID 179

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 106 of 162

000210

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 179 of 235 PageID 272
9 

62. “Exculpated Parties” means, collectively, (i) the Debtor and its successors 

and assigns, (ii) the Employees, (iii) Strand, (iv) the Independent Directors, (v) the Committee, 

(vi) the members of the Committee (in their official capacities), (vii) the Professionals retained by 

the Debtor and the Committee in the Chapter 11 Case, (viii) the CEO/CRO; and (ix) the Related 

Persons of each of the parties listed in (iv) through (viii); provided, however, that, for the avoidance 

of doubt, none of James Dondero, Mark Okada, NexPoint Advisors, L.P. (and any of its 

subsidiaries and managed entities), the Charitable Donor Advised Fund, L.P. (and any of its 

subsidiaries, including CLO Holdco, Ltd., and managed entities), Highland CLO Funding, Ltd. 

(and any of its subsidiaries, members, and managed entities), Highland Capital Management Fund 

Advisors, L.P. (and any of its subsidiaries and managed entities), NexBank, SSB (and any of its 

subsidiaries), the Hunter Mountain Investment Trust (or any trustee acting for the trust), the 

Dugaboy Investment Trust (or any trustee acting for the trust), or Grant Scott is included in the 

term “Exculpated Party.” 

63. “Executory Contract” means a contract to which the Debtor is a party that 

is subject to assumption or rejection under sections 365 or 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

64. “Exhibit” means an exhibit annexed hereto or to the Disclosure Statement 

(as such exhibits are amended, modified or otherwise supplemented from time to time), which are 

incorporated by reference herein. 

65. “Federal Judgment Rate” means the post-judgment interest rate set forth in 

28 U.S.C. § 1961 as of the Effective Date. 

66. “File” or “Filed” or “Filing” means file, filed or filing with the Bankruptcy 

Court or its authorized designee in the Chapter 11 Case. 

67. “Final Order” means an order or judgment of the Bankruptcy Court, which 

is in full force and effect, and as to which the time to appeal, petition for certiorari, or move for a 

new trial, reargument or rehearing has expired and as to which no appeal, petition for certiorari, 

or other proceedings for a new trial, reargument or rehearing shall then be pending or as to which 

any right to appeal, petition for certiorari, new trial, reargument, or rehearing shall have been 

waived in writing in form and substance satisfactory to the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the 

Claimant Trustee, as applicable, or, in the event that an appeal, writ of certiorari, new trial, 

reargument, or rehearing thereof has been sought, such order of the Bankruptcy Court shall have 

been determined by the highest court to which such order was appealed, or certiorari, new trial, 

reargument or rehearing shall have been denied and the time to take any further appeal, petition 

for certiorari, or move for a new trial, reargument or rehearing shall have expired; provided, 

however, that the possibility that a motion under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

or any analogous rule under the Bankruptcy Rules, may be Filed with respect to such order shall 

not preclude such order from being a Final Order. 

68. “Frontier Secured Claim” means the loan from Frontier State Bank to the 

Debtor in the principal amount of $7,879,688.00 made pursuant to that certain First Amended and 

Restated Loan Agreement, dated March 29, 2018. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 106 of

161

Appx. 0126

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 107 of 162 PageID 180

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 107 of 162

000211

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 180 of 235 PageID 273
10 

69. “General Partner Interest” means the Class A Limited Partnership Interest 

held by Strand, as the Debtor’s general partner. 

70. “General Unsecured Claim” means any prepetition Claim against the 

Debtor that is not Secured and is not a/an: (a) Administrative Expense Claim; (b) Professional Fee 

Claim; (c) Priority Tax Claim; (d) Priority Non-Tax Claim; or (e) Convenience Claim. 

71. “Governmental Unit” means a “governmental unit” as defined in 

section 101(27) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

72. “GUC Election” means the option provided to each Holder of a 

Convenience Claim on their Ballot to elect to receive the treatment provided to General Unsecured 

Claims. 

73. “Holder” means an Entity holding a Claim against, or Equity Interest in, the 

Debtor. 

74. “Impaired” means, when used in reference to a Claim or Equity Interest, a 

Claim or Equity Interest that is impaired within the meaning of section 1124 of the Bankruptcy 

Code. 

75. “Independent Directors” means John S. Dubel, James P. Seery, Jr., and 

Russell Nelms, the independent directors of Strand appointed on January 9, 2020, and any 

additional or replacement directors of Strand appointed after January 9, 2020, but prior to the 

Effective Date. 

76. “Initial Distribution Date” means, subject to the “Treatment” sections in 

ARTICLE III hereof, the date that is on or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective 

Date, when distributions under this Plan shall commence to Holders of Allowed Claims and Equity 

Interests. 

77. “Insurance Policies” means all insurance policies maintained by the Debtor 

as of the Petition Date. 

78. “Jefferies Secured Claim” means any Claim in favor of Jefferies, LLC, 

arising under that certain Prime Brokerage Customer Agreement, dated May 24, 2013, between 

the Debtor and Jefferies, LLC, that is secured by the assets, if any, maintained in the prime 

brokerage account created by such Prime Brokerage Customer Agreement. 

79. “Lien” means a “lien” as defined in section 101(37) of the Bankruptcy Code 

and, with respect to any asset, includes, without limitation, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, 

security interest or other encumbrance of any kind, or any other type of preferential arrangement 

that has the practical effect of creating a security interest, in respect of such asset. 

80. “Limited Partnership Agreement” means that certain Fourth Amended and 

Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Highland Capital Management, L.P., dated 

December 24, 2015, as amended. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 107 of

161

Appx. 0127

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 108 of 162 PageID 181

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 108 of 162

000212

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 181 of 235 PageID 274
11 

81. “Litigation Sub-Trust” means the sub-trust established within the Claimant 

Trust or as a wholly –owned subsidiary of the Claimant Trust on the Effective Date in each case 

in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement and 

Claimant Trust Agreement. As set forth in the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement, the Litigation 

Sub-Trust shall hold the Claimant Trust Assets that are Estate Claims. 

82. “Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement” means the agreement filed in the Plan 

Supplement establishing and delineating the terms and conditions of the Litigation Sub-Trust. 

83. “Litigation Trustee” means the trustee appointed by the Committee and 

reasonably acceptable to the Debtor who shall be responsible for investigating, litigating, and 

settling the Estate Claims for the benefit of the Claimant Trust in accordance with the terms and 

conditions set forth in the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement. 

84. “Managed Funds” means Highland Multi-Strategy Credit Fund, L.P., 

Highland Restoration Capital Partners, L.P., and any other investment vehicle managed by the 

Debtor pursuant to an Executory Contract assumed pursuant to this Plan. 

85. “New Frontier Note” means that promissory note to be provided to the 

Allowed Holders of Class 2 Claims under this Plan and any other documents or security 

agreements securing the obligations thereunder. 

86. “New GP LLC” means a limited liability company incorporated in the State 

of Delaware pursuant to the New GP LLC Documents to serve as the general partner of the 

Reorganized Debtor on the Effective Date. 

87. “New GP LLC Documents” means the charter, operating agreement, and 

other formational documents of New GP LLC. 

88. “Ordinary Course Professionals Order” means that certain Order Pursuant 

to Sections 105(a), 327, 328, and 330 of the Bankruptcy Code Authorizing the Debtor to Retain, 

Employ, and Compensate Certain Professionals Utilized by the Debtor in the Ordinary Course 

[D.I. 176]. 

89. “Other Unsecured Claim” means any Secured Claim other than the 

Jefferies Secured Claim and the Frontier Secured Claim. 

90. “Person” means a “person” as defined in section 101(41) of the Bankruptcy 

Code and also includes any natural person, individual, corporation, company, general or limited 

partnership, limited liability company, unincorporated organization firm, trust, estate, business 

trust, association, joint stock company, joint venture, government, governmental agency, 

Governmental Unit or any subdivision thereof, the United States Trustee, or any other entity, 

whether acting in an individual, fiduciary or other capacity. 

91. “Petition Date” means October 16, 2019. 

92. “Plan” means this Debtor’s Fifth Amended Chapter 11 Plan of 

Reorganization, including the Exhibits and the Plan Documents and all supplements, appendices, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 108 of

161

Appx. 0128

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 109 of 162 PageID 182

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 109 of 162

000213

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 182 of 235 PageID 275
12 

and schedules thereto, either in its present form or as the same may be altered, amended, modified 

or otherwise supplemented from time to time. 

93. “Plan Distribution” means the payment or distribution of consideration to 

Holders of Allowed Claims and Allowed Equity Interests under this Plan. 

94. “Plan Documents” means any of the documents, other than this Plan, but 

including, without limitation, the documents to be filed with the Plan Supplement, to be executed, 

delivered, assumed, or performed in connection with the occurrence of the Effective Date, and as 

may be modified consistent with the terms hereof with the consent of the Committee. 

95. “Plan Supplement” means the ancillary documents necessary for the 

implementation and effectuation of the Plan, including, without limitation, (i) the form of Claimant 

Trust Agreement, (ii) the forms of New GP LLC Documents, (iii) the form of Reorganized Limited 

Partnership Agreement, (iv) the Sub-Servicer Agreement (if applicable), (v) the identity of the 

initial members of the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee, (vi) the form of Litigation Sub-Trust 

Agreement; (vii) the schedule of retained Causes of Action; (viii) the New Frontier Note, (ix) the 

schedule of Employees; (x) the form of Senior Employee Stipulation,; and (xi) the schedule of 

Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases to be assumed pursuant to this Plan, which, in each 

case, will be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Debtor and the Committee. 

96. “Priority Non-Tax Claim” means a Claim entitled to priority pursuant to 

section 507(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, including any Claims for paid time-off entitled to priority 

under section 507(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, other than a Priority Tax Claim or an 

Administrative Claim. 

97. “Pro Rata” means the proportion that (a) the Allowed amount of a Claim or 

Equity Interest in a particular Class bears to (b) the aggregate Allowed amount of all Claims or 

Equity Interests in such Class. 

98. “Professional” means (a) any Entity employed in the Chapter 11 Case 

pursuant to section 327, 328 363 or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise and (b) any Entity 

seeking compensation or reimbursement of expenses in connection with the Chapter 11 Case 

pursuant to sections 327, 328, 330, 331, 363, 503(b), 503(b)(4) and 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

99. “Professional Fee Claim” means a Claim under sections 328, 330(a), 331, 

363, 503 or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code, with respect to a particular Professional, for 

compensation for services rendered or reimbursement of costs, expenses or other charges incurred 

after the Petition Date and prior to and including the Effective Date. 

100. “Professional Fee Claims Bar Date” means with respect to Professional Fee 

Claims, the Business Day which is sixty (60) days after the Effective Date or such other date as 

approved by order of the Bankruptcy Court. 

101. “Professional Fee Claims Objection Deadline” means, with respect to any 

Professional Fee Claim, thirty (30) days after the timely Filing of the applicable request for 

payment of such Professional Fee Claim. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 109 of

161

Appx. 0129

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 110 of 162 PageID 183

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 110 of 162

000214

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 183 of 235 PageID 276
13 

102. “Professional Fee Reserve” means the reserve established and funded by 

the Claimant Trustee pursuant this Plan to provide sufficient funds to satisfy in full unpaid Allowed 

Professional Fee Claims. 

103. “Proof of Claim” means a written proof of Claim or Equity Interest Filed 

against the Debtor in the Chapter 11 Case. 

104. “Priority Tax Claim” means any Claim of a Governmental Unit of the kind 

specified in section 507(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

105. “Protected Parties” means, collectively, (i) the Debtor and its successors 

and assigns, direct and indirect majority-owned subsidiaries, and the Managed Funds, (ii) the 

Employees, (iii) Strand, (iv) the Reorganized Debtor, (v) the Independent Directors, (vi) the 

Committee, (vii) the members of the Committee (in their official capacities), (viii) the Claimant 

Trust, (ix) the Claimant Trustee, (x) the Litigation Sub-Trust, (xi) the Litigation Trustee, (xii) the 

members of the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee (in their official capacities), (xiii) New GP 

LLC, (xiv) the Professionals retained by the Debtor and the Committee in the Chapter 11 Case, 

(xv) the CEO/CRO; and (xvi) the Related Persons of each of the parties listed in (iv) through (xv); 

provided, however, that, for the avoidance of doubt, none of James Dondero, Mark Okada, 

NexPoint Advisors, L.P. (and any of its subsidiaries and managed entities), the Charitable Donor 

Advised Fund, L.P. (and any of its subsidiaries, including CLO Holdco, Ltd., and managed 

entities), Highland CLO Funding, Ltd. (and any of its subsidiaries, members, and managed 

entities), NexBank, SSB (and any of its subsidiaries), Highland Capital Management Fund 

Advisors, L.P. (and any of its subsidiaries and managed entities), the Hunter Mountain Investment 

Trust (or any trustee acting for the trust), the Dugaboy Investment Trust (or any trustee acting for 

the trust), or Grant Scott is included in the term “Protected Party.” 

106. “PTO Claims” means any Claim for paid time off in favor of any Debtor 

employee in excess of the amount that would qualify as a Priority Non-Tax Claim under section 

507(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

107. “Reduced Employee Claims” has the meaning set forth in ARTICLE IX.D. 

108. “Reinstated” means, with respect to any Claim or Equity Interest, (a) 

leaving unaltered the legal, equitable, and contractual rights to which a Claim entitles the Holder 

of such Claim or Equity Interest in accordance with section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code or (b) 

notwithstanding any contractual provision or applicable law that entitles the Holder of such Claim 

or Equity Interest to demand or receive accelerated payment of such Claim or Equity Interest after 

the occurrence of a default: (i) curing any such default that occurred before or after the Petition 

Date, other than a default of a kind specified in section 365(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code or of a 

kind that section 365(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code expressly does not require to be cured; (ii) 

reinstating the maturity of such Claim or Equity Interest as such maturity existed before such 

default; (iii) compensating the Holder of such Claim or Equity Interest for any damages incurred 

as a result of any reasonable reliance by such Holder on such contractual provision or such 

applicable law; (iv) if such Claim or Equity Interest arises from any failure to perform a 

nonmonetary obligation, other than a default arising from failure to operate a non-residential real 

property lease subject to section 365(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, compensating the Holder 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 110 of

161

Appx. 0130

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 111 of 162 PageID 184

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 111 of 162

000215

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 184 of 235 PageID 277
14 

of such Claim or Equity Interest (other than any Debtor or an insider of any Debtor) for any actual 

pecuniary loss incurred by such Holder as a result of such failure; and (v) not otherwise altering 

the legal, equitable, or contractual rights to which such Claim entitles the Holder of such Claim. 

109. “Rejection Claim” means any Claim for monetary damages as a result of 

the rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease pursuant to the Confirmation Order. 

110. “Related Entity” means, without duplication, (a) Dondero, (b) Mark Okada 

(“Okada”), (c) Grant Scott (“Scott”), (d) Hunter Covitz (“Covitz”), (e) any entity or person that 

was an insider of the Debtor on or before the Petition Date under Section 101(31) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, including, without limitation, any entity or person that was a non-statutory 

insider, (f) any entity that, after the Effective Date, is an insider or Affiliate of one or more of 

Dondero, Okada, Scott, Covitz, or any of their respective insiders or Affiliates, including, without 

limitation, The Dugaboy Investment Trust, (g) the Hunter Mountain Investment Trust and any of 

its direct or indirect parents, (h) the Charitable Donor Advised Fund, L.P., and any of its direct or 

indirect subsidiaries, and (i) Affiliates of the Debtor and any other Entities listed on the Related 

Entity List. 

111. “Related Entity List” means that list of Entities filed with the Plan 

Supplement. 

112. “Related Persons” means, with respect to any Person, such Person’s 

predecessors, successors, assigns (whether by operation of law or otherwise), and each of their 

respective present, future, or former officers, directors, employees, managers, managing members, 

members, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, consultants, 

professionals, advisors, shareholders, principals, partners, subsidiaries, divisions, management 

companies, heirs, agents, and other representatives, in each case solely in their capacity as such. 

113. “Released Parties” means, collectively, (i) the Independent Directors; (ii) 

Strand (solely from the date of the appointment of the Independent Directors through the Effective 

Date); (iii) the CEO/CRO; (iv) the Committee; (v) the members of the Committee (in their official 

capacities), (vi) the Professionals retained by the Debtor and the Committee in the Chapter 11 

Case; and (vii) the Employees. 

114. “Reorganized Debtor” means the Debtor, as reorganized pursuant to this 

Plan on and after the Effective Date. 

115. “Reorganized Debtor Assets” means any limited and general partnership 

interests held by the Debtor, the management of the Managed Funds and those Causes of Action 

(including, without limitation, claims for breach of fiduciary duty), that, for any reason, are not 

capable of being transferred to the Claimant Trust. For the avoidance of doubt, “Reorganized 

Debtor Assets” includes any partnership interests or shares of Managed Funds held by the Debtor 

but does not include the underlying portfolio assets held by the Managed Funds. 

116. “Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement” means that certain Fifth 

Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Highland Capital Management, L.P., 

by and among the Claimant Trust, as limited partner, and New GP LLC, as general partner, Filed 

with the Plan Supplement. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 111 of

161

Appx. 0131

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 112 of 162 PageID 185

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 112 of 162

000216

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 185 of 235 PageID 278
15 

117. “Restructuring” means the restructuring of the Debtor, the principal terms 

of which are set forth in this Plan and the Disclosure Statement. 

118. “Retained Employee Claim” means any Claim filed by a current employee 

of the Debtor who will be employed by the Reorganized Debtor upon the Effective Date. 

119. “Schedules” means the schedules of Assets and liabilities, statements of 

financial affairs, lists of Holders of Claims and Equity Interests and all amendments or 

supplements thereto Filed by the Debtor with the Bankruptcy Court [D.I. 247]. 

120. “Secured” means, when referring to a Claim: (a) secured by a Lien on 

property in which the Debtor’s Estate has an interest, which Lien is valid, perfected, and 

enforceable pursuant to applicable law or by reason of a Bankruptcy Court order, or that is subject 

to setoff pursuant to section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code, to the extent of the value of the creditor’s 

interest in the interest of the Debtor’s Estate in such property or to the extent of the amount subject 

to setoff, as applicable, as determined pursuant to section 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code or (b) 

Allowed pursuant to the Plan as a Secured Claim. 

121. “Security” or “security” means any security as such term is defined in 

section 101(49) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

122. “Senior Employees” means the senior employees of the Debtor Filed in the 

Plan Supplement. 

123. “Senior Employee Stipulation” means the agreements filed in the Plan 

Supplement between each Senior Employee and the Debtor. 

124. “Stamp or Similar Tax” means any stamp tax, recording tax, personal 

property tax, conveyance fee, intangibles or similar tax, real estate transfer tax, sales tax, use tax, 

transaction privilege tax (including, without limitation, such taxes on prime contracting and ownerbuilder sales), privilege taxes (including, without limitation, privilege taxes on construction 

contracting with regard to speculative builders and owner builders), and other similar taxes 

imposed or assessed by any Governmental Unit. 

125. “Statutory Fees” means fees payable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930. 

126. “Strand” means Strand Advisors, Inc., the Debtor’s general partner. 

127. “Sub-Servicer” means a third-party selected by the Claimant Trustee to 

service or sub-service the Reorganized Debtor Assets. 

128. “Sub-Servicer Agreement” means the agreement that may be entered into 

providing for the servicing of the Reorganized Debtor Assets by the Sub-Servicer. 

129. “Subordinated Claim” means any Claim that is subordinated to the 

Convenience Claims and General Unsecured Claims pursuant to an order entered by the 

Bankruptcy Court (including any other court having jurisdiction over the Chapter 11 Case) after 

notice and a hearing. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 112 of

161

Appx. 0132

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 113 of 162 PageID 186

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 113 of 162

000217

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 186 of 235 PageID 279
16 

130. “Subordinated Claimant Trust Interests” means the Claimant Trust Interests 

to be distributed to Holders of Allowed Subordinated Claims under the Plan, which such interests 

shall be subordinated in right and priority to the Claimant Trust Interests distributed to Holders of 

Allowed General Unsecured Claims as provided in the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

131. “Trust Distribution” means the transfer of Cash or other property by the 

Claimant Trustee to the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries. 

132. “Trustees” means, collectively, the Claimant Trustee and Litigation 

Trustee. 

133. “UBS” means, collectively, UBS Securities LLC and UBS AG London 

Branch. 

134. “Unexpired Lease” means a lease to which the Debtor is a party that is 

subject to assumption or rejection under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

135. “Unimpaired” means, with respect to a Class of Claims or Equity Interests 

that is not impaired within the meaning of section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

136. “Voting Deadline” means the date and time by which all Ballots to accept 

or reject the Plan must be received in order to be counted under the under the Order of the 

Bankruptcy Court approving the Disclosure Statement as containing adequate information 

pursuant to section 1125(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and authorizing the Debtor to solicit 

acceptances of the Plan. 

137. “Voting Record Date” means November 23, 2020. 

ARTICLE II.

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS 

A. Administrative Expense Claims 

On the later of the Effective Date or the date on which an Administrative Expense Claim 

becomes an Allowed Administrative Expense Claim, or, in each such case, as soon as practicable 

thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Administrative Expense Claim (other than Professional Fee 

Claims) will receive, in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge and release of, and in exchange for, 

such Allowed Administrative Expense Claim either (i) payment in full in Available Cash for the 

unpaid portion of such Allowed Administrative Expense Claim; or (ii) such other less favorable 

treatment as agreed to in writing by the Debtor or the Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, and such 

Holder; provided, however, that Administrative Expense Claims incurred by the Debtor in the 

ordinary course of business may be paid in the ordinary course of business in the discretion of the 

Debtor in accordance with such applicable terms and conditions relating thereto without further 

notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court. All statutory fees payable under 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a) 

shall be paid as such fees become due. 

If an Administrative Expense Claim (other than a Professional Fee Claim) is not paid by 

the Debtor in the ordinary course, the Holder of such Administrative Expense Claim must File, on 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 113 of

161

Appx. 0133

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 114 of 162 PageID 187

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 114 of 162

000218

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 187 of 235 PageID 280
17 

or before the applicable Administrative Expense Claims Bar Date, and serve on the Debtor or 

Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, and such other Entities who are designated by the Bankruptcy 

Rules, the Confirmation Order or other order of the Bankruptcy Court, an application for allowance 

and payment of such Administrative Expense Claim. 

Objections to any Administrative Expense Claim (other than a Professional Fee Claim) 

must be Filed and served on the Debtor or the Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, and the party 

asserting such Administrative Expense Claim by the Administrative Expense Claims Objection 

Deadline. 

B. Professional Fee Claims 

Professionals or other Entities asserting a Professional Fee Claim for services rendered 

through the Effective Date must submit fee applications under sections 327, 328, 329,330, 331, 

503(b) or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code and, upon entry of an order of the Bankruptcy Court 

granting such fee applications, such Professional Fee Claim shall promptly be paid in Cash in full 

to the extent provided in such order. 

Professionals or other Entities asserting a Professional Fee Claim for services rendered on 

or prior to the Effective Date must File, on or before the Professional Fee Claims Bar Date, and 

serve on the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, and such other Entities who are 

designated as requiring such notice by the Bankruptcy Rules, the Confirmation Order or other 

order of the Bankruptcy Court, an application for final allowance of such Professional Fee Claim. 

Objections to any Professional Fee Claim must be Filed and served on the Debtor or 

Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, and the party asserting the Professional Fee Claim by the 

Professional Fee Claim Objection Deadline. Each Holder of an Allowed Professional Fee Claim 

will be paid by the Debtor or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, in Cash within ten (10) Business 

Days of entry of the order approving such Allowed Professional Fee Claim. 

On the Effective Date, the Claimant Trustee shall establish the Professional Fee Reserve. 

The Professional Fee Reserve shall vest in the Claimant Trust and shall be maintained by the 

Claimant Trustee in accordance with the Plan and Claimant Trust Agreement. The Claimant Trust 

shall fund the Professional Fee Reserve on the Effective Date in an estimated amount determined 

by the Debtor in good faith prior to the Confirmation Date and that approximates the total projected 

amount of unpaid Professional Fee Claims on the Effective Date. Following the payment of all 

Allowed Professional Fee Claims, any excess funds in the Professional Fee Reserve shall be 

released to the Claimant Trust to be used for other purposes consistent with the Plan and the 

Claimant Trust Agreement. 

C. Priority Tax Claims 

On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the later of (i) the Initial Distribution Date if 

such Priority Tax Claim is an Allowed Priority Tax Claim as of the Effective Date or (ii) the date 

on which such Priority Tax Claim becomes an Allowed Priority Tax Claim, each Holder of an 

Allowed Priority Tax Claim will receive in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge and release of, 

and in exchange for, such Allowed Priority Tax Claim, at the election of the Debtor: (a) Cash in 

an amount of a total value as of the Effective Date of the Plan equal to the amount of such Allowed 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 114 of

161

Appx. 0134

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 115 of 162 PageID 188

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 115 of 162

000219

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 188 of 235 PageID 281
18 

Priority Tax Claim in accordance with section 1129(a)(9)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code, or (b) if 

paid over time, payment of such Allowed Priority Tax Claim in accordance with section 

1129(a)(9)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code; or (c) such other less favorable treatment as agreed to in 

writing by the Debtor and such Holder. Payment of statutory fees due pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1930(a)(6) will be made at all appropriate times until the entry of a final decree; provided, however, 

that the Debtor may prepay any or all such Claims at any time, without premium or penalty. 

ARTICLE III.

CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT OF 

CLASSIFIED CLAIMS AND EQUITY INTERESTS 

A. Summary 

All Claims and Equity Interests, except Administrative Expense Claims and Priority Tax 

Claims, are classified in the Classes set forth below. In accordance with section 1123(a)(1) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, Administrative Expense Claims, and Priority Tax Claims have not been 

classified. 

The categories of Claims and Equity Interests listed below classify Claims and Equity 

Interests for all purposes including, without limitation, confirmation and distribution pursuant to 

the Plan and pursuant to sections 1122 and 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Plan deems 

a Claim or Equity Interest to be classified in a particular Class only to the extent that the Claim or 

Equity Interest qualifies within the description of that Class and will be deemed classified in a 

different Class to the extent that any remainder of such Claim or Equity Interest qualifies within 

the description of such different Class. A Claim or Equity Interest is in a particular Class only to 

the extent that any such Claim or Equity Interest is Allowed in that Class and has not been paid, 

released or otherwise settled (in each case, by the Debtor or any other Entity) prior to the Effective 

Date. 

B. Summary of Classification and Treatment of Classified Claims and Equity Interests 

Class Claim Status Voting Rights 

1 Jefferies Secured Claim Unimpaired Deemed to Accept 

2 Frontier Secured Claim Impaired Entitled to Vote 

3 Other Secured Claims Unimpaired Deemed to Accept 

4 Priority Non-Tax Claim Unimpaired Deemed to Accept 

5 Retained Employee Claim Unimpaired Deemed to Accept 

6 PTO Claims Unimpaired Deemed to Accept 

7 Convenience Claims Impaired Entitled to Vote 

8 General Unsecured Claims Impaired Entitled to Vote 

9 Subordinated Claims Impaired Entitled to Vote 

10 Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests Impaired Entitled to Vote 

11 Class A Limited Partnership Interests Impaired Entitled to Vote 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 115 of

161

Appx. 0135

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 116 of 162 PageID 189

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 116 of 162

000220

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 189 of 235 PageID 282
19 

C. Elimination of Vacant Classes

Any Class that, as of the commencement of the Confirmation Hearing, does not have at 

least one Holder of a Claim or Equity Interest that is Allowed in an amount greater than zero for 

voting purposes shall be considered vacant, deemed eliminated from the Plan for purposes of 

voting to accept or reject the Plan, and disregarded for purposes of determining whether the Plan 

satisfies section 1129(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code with respect to such Class. 

D. Impaired/Voting Classes 

Claims and Equity Interests in Class 2 and Class 7 through Class 11 are Impaired by the 

Plan, and only the Holders of Claims or Equity Interests in those Classes are entitled to vote to 

accept or reject the Plan. 

E. Unimpaired/Non-Voting Classes 

Claims in Class 1 and Class 3 through Class 6 are Unimpaired by the Plan, and such 

Holders are deemed to have accepted the Plan and are therefore not entitled to vote on the Plan. 

F. Impaired/Non-Voting Classes 

There are no Classes under the Plan that will not receive or retain any property and no 

Classes are deemed to reject the Plan. 

G. Cramdown

If any Class of Claims or Equity Interests is deemed to reject this Plan or does not vote to 

accept this Plan, the Debtor may (i) seek confirmation of this Plan under section 1129(b) of the 

Bankruptcy Code or (ii) amend or modify this Plan in accordance with the terms hereof and the 

Bankruptcy Code. If a controversy arises as to whether any Claims or Equity Interests, or any 

class of Claims or Equity Interests, are Impaired, the Bankruptcy Court shall, after notice and a 

hearing, determine such controversy on or before the Confirmation Date. 

H. Classification and Treatment of Claims and Equity Interests 

1. Class 1 – Jefferies Secured Claim 

x Classification: Class 1 consists of the Jefferies Secured Claim. 

x Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, 

each Holder of an Allowed Class 1 Claim will receive in full satisfaction, 

settlement, discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such Allowed 

Class 1 Claim, at the election of the Debtor: (A) Cash equal to the amount 

of such Allowed Class 1 Claim; (B) such other less favorable treatment as 

to which the Debtor and the Holder of such Allowed Class 1 Claim will 

have agreed upon in writing; or (C) such other treatment rendering such 

Claim Unimpaired. Each Holder of an Allowed Class 1 Claim will retain 

the Liens securing its Allowed Class 1 Claim as of the Effective Date until 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 116 of

161

Appx. 0136

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 117 of 162 PageID 190

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 117 of 162

000221

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 190 of 235 PageID 283
20 

full and final payment of such Allowed Class 1 Claim is made as provided 

herein. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 1 is Unimpaired, and the Holders of Class 1 

Claims are conclusively deemed to have accepted this Plan pursuant to 

section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Holders of Class 1 

Claims are not entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan and will not be 

solicited. 

2. Class 2 – Frontier Secured Claim 

x Classification: Class 2 consists of the Frontier Secured Claim. 

x Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, 

each Holder of an Allowed Class 2 Claim will receive in full satisfaction, 

settlement, discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such Allowed 

Class 2 Claim: (A) Cash in an amount equal to all accrued but unpaid 

interest on the Frontier Claim through and including the Effective Date and 

(B) the New Frontier Note. The Holder of an Allowed Class 2 Claim will 

retain the Liens securing its Allowed Class 2 Claim as of the Effective Date 

until full and final payment of such Allowed Class 2 Claim is made as 

provided herein. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 2 is Impaired, and the Holders of Class 2 

Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan. 

3. Class 3 – Other Secured Claims 

x Classification: Class 3 consists of the Other Secured Claims. 

x Allowance and Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the 

later of (i) the Initial Distribution Date if such Class 3 Claim is Allowed on 

the Effective Date or (ii) the date on which such Class 3 Claim becomes an 

Allowed Class 3 Claim, each Holder of an Allowed Class 3 Claim will 

receive in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge and release of, and in 

exchange for, its Allowed Claim 3 Claim, at the option of the Debtor, or 

following the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtor or Claimant Trustee, 

as applicable, (i) Cash equal to such Allowed Other Secured Claim, (ii) the 

collateral securing its Allowed Other Secured Claim, plus postpetition 

interest to the extent required under Bankruptcy Code Section 506(b), or 

(iii) such other treatment rendering such Claim Unimpaired. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 3 is Unimpaired, and the Holders of Class 3 

Claims are conclusively deemed to have accepted this Plan pursuant to 

section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Holders of Class 3 

Claims are not entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan and will not be 

solicited. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 117 of

161

Appx. 0137

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 118 of 162 PageID 191

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 118 of 162

000222

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 191 of 235 PageID 284
21 

4. Class 4 – Priority Non-Tax Claims 

x Classification: Class 4 consists of the Priority Non-Tax Claims. 

x Allowance and Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the 

later of (i) the Initial Distribution Date if such Class 4 Claim is Allowed on 

the Effective Date or (ii) the date on which such Class 4 Claim becomes an 

Allowed Class 4 Claim, each Holder of an Allowed Class 4 Claim will 

receive in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge and release of, and in 

exchange for, its Allowed Claim 4 Claim Cash equal to the amount of such 

Allowed Class 4 Claim. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 4 is Unimpaired, and the Holders of Class 4 

Claims are conclusively deemed to have accepted this Plan pursuant to 

section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Holders of Class 4 

Claims are not entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan and will not be 

solicited. 

5. Class 5 – Retained Employee Claims 

x Classification: Class 5 consists of the Retained Employee Claims. 

x Allowance and Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the 

Effective Date, each Allowed Class 5 Claim will be Reinstated. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 5 is Unimpaired, and the Holders of Class 5 

Claims are conclusively deemed to have accepted this Plan pursuant to 

section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Holders of Class 5 

Claims are not entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan and will not be 

solicited. 

6. Class 6 – PTO Claims 

x Classification: Class 6 consists of the PTO Claims. 

x Allowance and Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the 

later of (i) the Initial Distribution Date if such Class 6 Claim is Allowed on 

the Effective Date or (ii) the date on which such Class 6 Claim becomes an 

Allowed Class 6 Claim, each Holder of an Allowed Class 6 Claim will 

receive in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge and release of, and in 

exchange for, its Allowed Claim 6 Claim Cash equal to the amount of such 

Allowed Class 6 Claim. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 6 is Unimpaired, and the Holders of Class 6 

Claims are conclusively deemed to have accepted this Plan pursuant to 

section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Holders of Class 6 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 118 of

161

Appx. 0138

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 119 of 162 PageID 192

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 119 of 162

000223

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 192 of 235 PageID 285
22 

Claims are not entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan and will not be 

solicited. 

7. Class 7 – Convenience Claims 

x Classification: Class 7 consists of the Convenience Claims. 

x Allowance and Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the 

later of (i) the Initial Distribution Date if such Class 7 Claim is Allowed on 

the Effective Date or (ii) the date on which such Class 7 Claim becomes an 

Allowed Class 7 Claim, each Holder of an Allowed Class 7 Claim will 

receive in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge and release of, and in 

exchange for, its Allowed Class 7 Claim (1) the treatment provided to 

Allowed Holders of Class 8 General Unsecured Claims if the Holder of such 

Class 7 Claim makes the GUC Election or (2) an amount in Cash equal to 

the lesser of (a) 85% of the Allowed amount of such Holder’s Class 7 Claim 

or (b) such Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Convenience Claims Cash Pool. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 7 is Impaired, and the Holders of Class 7 

Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan. 

8. Class 8 – General Unsecured Claims 

x Classification: Class 8 consists of the General Unsecured Claims. 

x Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, 

each Holder of an Allowed Class 8 Claim, in full satisfaction, settlement, 

discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such Claim shall receive (i) 

its Pro Rata share of the Claimant Trust Interests, (ii) such other less 

favorable treatment as to which such Holder and the Claimant Trustee shall 

have agreed upon in writing, or (iii) the treatment provided to Allowed 

Holders of Class 7 Convenience Claims if the Holder of such Class 8 

General Unsecured Claim is eligible and makes a valid Convenience Class 

Election. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, after the Effective Date 

and subject to the other provisions of this Plan, the Debtor, the Reorganized 

Debtor, and the Claimant Trust, as applicable, will have and will retain any 

and all rights and defenses under bankruptcy or nonbankruptcy law that the 

Debtor had with respect to any General Unsecured Claim, except with 

respect to any General Unsecured Claim Allowed by Final Order of the 

Bankruptcy Court. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 8 is Impaired, and the Holders of Class 8 

Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 119 of

161

Appx. 0139

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 120 of 162 PageID 193

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 120 of 162

000224

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 193 of 235 PageID 286
23 

9. Class 9 – Subordinated Claims 

x Classification: Class 9 consists of the Subordinated Claims. 

Treatment: On the Effective Date, Holders of Subordinated Claims shall 

receive either (i) their Pro Rata share of the Subordinated Claimant Trust 

Interests or, (ii) such other less favorable treatment as to which such Holder 

and the Claimant Trustee may agree upon in writing. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, after the Effective Date 

and subject to the other provisions of this Plan, the Debtor, the Reorganized 

Debtor, and the Claimant Trust, as applicable, will have and will retain any 

and all rights and defenses under bankruptcy or nonbankruptcy law that the 

Debtor had with respect to any Subordinated Claim, except with respect to 

any Subordinated Claim Allowed by Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 9 is Impaired, and the Holders of Class 9 

Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan. 

10. Class 10 – Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests 

x Classification: Class 10 consists of the Class B/C Limited Partnership 

Interests. 

x Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, 

each Holder of an Allowed Class 10 Claim, in full satisfaction, settlement, 

discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such Claim shall receive (i) 

its Pro Rata share of the Contingent Claimant Trust Interests or (ii) such 

other less favorable treatment as to which such Holder and the Claimant 

Trustee shall have agreed upon in writing. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, after the Effective Date 

and subject to the other provisions of this Plan, the Debtor, the Reorganized 

Debtor, and the Claimant Trust, as applicable, will have and will retain any 

and all rights and defenses under bankruptcy or nonbankruptcy law that the 

Debtor had with respect to any Class B/C Limited Partnership Interest 

Claim, except with respect to any Class B/C Limited Partnership Interest 

Claim Allowed by Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 10 is Impaired, and the Holders of Class 10 

Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan. 

11. Class 11 – Class A Limited Partnership Interests 

x Classification: Class 11 consists of the Class A Limited Partnership 

Interests. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 120 of

161

Appx. 0140

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 121 of 162 PageID 194

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 121 of 162

000225

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 194 of 235 PageID 287
24 

x Treatment: On or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, 

each Holder of an Allowed Class 11 Claim, in full satisfaction, settlement, 

discharge and release of, and in exchange for, such Claim shall receive (i) 

its Pro Rata share of the Contingent Claimant Trust Interests or (ii) such 

other less favorable treatment as to which such Holder and the Claimant 

Trustee shall have agreed upon in writing. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, after the Effective Date 

and subject to the other provisions of this Plan, the Debtor, the Reorganized 

Debtor, and the Claimant Trust, as applicable, will have and will retain any 

and all rights and defenses under bankruptcy or nonbankruptcy law that the 

Debtor had with respect to any Class A Limited Partnership Interest, except 

with respect to any Class A Limited Partnership Interest Allowed by Final 

Order of the Bankruptcy Court. 

x Impairment and Voting: Class 11 is Impaired, and the Holders of Class 11 

Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject this Plan. 

I. Special Provision Governing Unimpaired Claims 

Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, nothing under the Plan will affect the Debtor’s 

rights in respect of any Unimpaired Claims, including, without limitation, all rights in respect of 

legal and equitable defenses to or setoffs or recoupments against any such Unimpaired Claims. 

J. Subordinated Claims 

The allowance, classification, and treatment of all Claims under the Plan shall take into 

account and conform to the contractual, legal, and equitable subordination rights relating thereto, 

whether arising under general principles of equitable subordination, section 510(b) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, or otherwise. Upon written notice and hearing, the Debtor the Reorganized 

Debtor, and the Claimant Trustee reserve the right to seek entry of an order by the Bankruptcy 

Court to re-classify or to subordinate any Claim in accordance with any contractual, legal, or 

equitable subordination relating thereto, and the treatment afforded any Claim under the Plan that 

becomes a subordinated Claim at any time shall be modified to reflect such subordination. 

ARTICLE IV.

MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN 

A. Summary 

As discussed in the Disclosure Statement, the Plan will be implemented through (i) the 

Claimant Trust, (ii) the Litigation Sub-Trust, and (iii) the Reorganized Debtor. 

On the Effective Date, all Class A Limited Partnership Interests, including the Class A 

Limited Partnership Interests held by Strand, as general partner, and Class B/C Limited 

Partnerships in the Debtor will be cancelled, and new Class A Limited Partnership Interests in the 

Reorganized Debtor will be issued to the Claimant Trust and New GP LLC – a newly-chartered 

limited liability company wholly-owned by the Claimant Trust. The Claimant Trust, as limited 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 121 of

161

Appx. 0141

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 122 of 162 PageID 195

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 122 of 162

000226

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 195 of 235 PageID 288
25 

partner, will ratify New GP LLC’s appointment as general partner of the Reorganized Debtor, and 

on and following the Effective Date, the Claimant Trust will be the Reorganized Debtor’s limited 

partner and New GP LLC will be its general partner. The Claimant Trust, as limited partner, and 

New GP LLC, as general partner, will execute the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, 

which will amend and restate, in all respects, the Debtor’s current Limited Partnership Agreement. 

Following the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtor will be managed consistent with the terms 

of the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement by New GP LLC. The sole managing member 

of New GP LLC will be the Claimant Trust, and the Claimant Trustee will be the sole officer of 

New GP LLC on the Effective Date. 

Following the Effective Date, the Claimant Trust will administer the Claimant Trust Assets 

pursuant to this Plan and the Claimant Trust Agreement, and the Litigation Trustee will pursue, if 

applicable, the Estate Claims pursuant to the terms of the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement and the 

Plan. The Reorganized Debtor will administer the Reorganized Debtor Assets and, if needed, with 

the utilization of a Sub-Servicer, which administration will include, among other things, managing 

the wind down of the Managed Funds. 

Although the Reorganized Debtor will manage the wind down of the Managed Funds, it is 

currently anticipated that neither the Reorganized Debtor nor the Claimant Trust will assume or 

assume and assign the contracts between the Debtor and certain Related Entities pursuant to which 

the Debtor provides shared services and sub-advisory services to those Related Entities. The 

Debtor believes that the continued provision of the services under such contracts will not be cost 

effective. 

The Reorganized Debtor will distribute all proceeds from the wind down to the Claimant 

Trust, as its limited partner, and New GP LLC, as its general partner, in each case in accordance 

with the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement. Such proceeds, along with the proceeds of 

the Claimant Trust Assets, will ultimately be distributed to the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries as set 

forth in this Plan and the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

B. The Claimant Trust2

 

1. Creation and Governance of the Claimant Trust and Litigation Sub-Trust. 

On or prior to the Effective Date, the Debtor and the Claimant Trustee shall execute the 

Claimant Trust Agreement and shall take all steps necessary to establish the Claimant Trust and 

the Litigation Sub-Trust in accordance with the Plan in each case for the benefit of the Claimant 

Trust Beneficiaries. Additionally, on or prior to the Effective Date, the Debtor shall irrevocably 

transfer and shall be deemed to have irrevocably transferred to the Claimant Trust all of its rights, 

title, and interest in and to all of the Claimant Trust Assets, and in accordance with section 1141 

of the Bankruptcy Code, the Claimant Trust Assets shall automatically vest in the Claimant Trust 

free and clear of all Claims, Liens, encumbrances, or interests subject only to the Claimant Trust 

Interests and the Claimant Trust Expenses, as provided for in the Claimant Trust Agreement, and 

2

 In the event of a conflict between the terms of this summary and the terms of the Claimant Trust Agreement and the 

Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement, the terms of the Claimant Trust Agreement or the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement, 

as applicable, shall control. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 122 of

161

Appx. 0142

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 123 of 162 PageID 196

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 123 of 162

000227

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 196 of 235 PageID 289
26 

such transfer shall be exempt from any stamp, real estate transfer, mortgage from any stamp, 

transfer, reporting, sales, use, or other similar tax. 

The Claimant Trustee shall be the exclusive trustee of the Claimant Trust Assets, excluding 

the Estate Claims and the Litigation Trustee shall be the exclusive trustee with respect to the Estate 

Claims in each case for purposes of 31 U.S.C. § 3713(b) and 26 U.S.C. § 6012(b)(3), as well as 

the representative of the Estate appointed pursuant to section 1123(b)(3)(B) of the Bankruptcy 

Code with respect to the Claimant Trust Assets. The Claimant Trustee shall also be responsible 

for resolving all Claims and Equity Interests in Class 8 through Class 11, under the supervision of 

the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee. 

On the Effective Date, the Claimant Trustee and Litigation Trustee shall execute the 

Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement and shall take all steps necessary to establish the Litigation SubTrust. Upon the creation of the Litigation Sub-Trust, the Claimant Trust shall irrevocably transfer 

and assign to the Litigation Sub-Trust the Estate Claims. The Claimant Trust shall be governed 

by the Claimant Trust Agreement and administered by the Claimant Trustee. The powers, rights, 

and responsibilities of the Claimant Trustee shall be specified in the Claimant Trust Agreement 

and shall include the authority and responsibility to, among other things, take the actions set forth 

in this ARTICLE IV, subject to any required reporting to the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee 

as may be set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement. The Claimant Trust shall hold and distribute 

the Claimant Trust Assets (including the proceeds from the Estate Claims, if any) in accordance 

with the provisions of the Plan and the Claimant Trust Agreement; provided that the Claimant 

Trust Oversight Committee may direct the Claimant Trust to reserve Cash from distributions as 

necessary to fund the Claimant Trust and Litigation Sub-Trust. Other rights and duties of the 

Claimant Trustee and the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries shall be as set forth in the Claimant Trust 

Agreement. After the Effective Date, neither the Debtor nor the Reorganized Debtor shall have 

any interest in the Claimant Trust Assets. 

The Litigation Sub-Trust shall be governed by the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement and 

administered by the Litigation Trustee. The powers, rights, and responsibilities of the Litigation 

Trustee shall be specified in the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement and shall include the authority 

and responsibility to, among other things, take the actions set forth in this ARTICLE IV, subject 

to any required reporting as may be set forth in the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement. The Litigation 

Sub-Trust shall investigate, prosecute, settle, or otherwise resolve the Estate Claims in accordance 

with the provisions of the Plan and the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement and shall distribute the 

proceeds therefrom to the Claimant Trust for distribution. Other rights and duties of the Litigation 

Trustee shall be as set forth in the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement. 

2. Claimant Trust Oversight Committee 

The Claimant Trust, the Claimant Trustee, the management and monetization of the 

Claimant Trust Assets, and the management of the Reorganized Debtor (through the Claimant 

Trust’s role as managing member of New GP LLC) and the Litigation Sub-Trust will be overseen 

by the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee, subject to the terms of the Claimant Trust Agreement 

and the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement, as applicable. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 123 of

161

Appx. 0143

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 124 of 162 PageID 197

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 124 of 162

000228

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 197 of 235 PageID 290
27 

The Claimant Trust Oversight Committee will initially consist of five members. Four of 

the five members will be representatives of the members of the Committee: (i) the Redeemer 

Committee of Highland Crusader Fund, (ii) UBS, (iii) Acis, and (iv) Meta-e Discovery. The fifth 

member will be an independent, natural Person chosen by the Committee and reasonably 

acceptable to the Debtor. The members of the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee may be 

replaced as set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement. The identity of the members of the Claimant 

Trust Oversight Committee will be disclosed in the Plan Supplement. 

As set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement, in no event will any member of the Claimant 

Trust Oversight Committee with a Claim against the Estate be entitled to vote, opine, or otherwise 

be involved in any matters related to such member’s Claim. 

The independent member(s) of the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee may be entitled 

to compensation for their services as set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement. Any member of 

the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee may be removed, and successor chosen, in the manner 

set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

3. Purpose of the Claimant Trust. 

The Claimant Trust shall be established for the purpose of (i) managing and monetizing 

the Claimant Trust Assets, subject to the terms of the Claimant Trust Agreement and the oversight 

of the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee, (ii) serving as the limited partner of, and holding the 

limited partnership interests in, the Reorganized Debtor, (iii) serving as the sole member and 

manager of New GP LLC, the Reorganized Debtor’s general partner, (iv) in its capacity as the sole 

member and manager of New GP LLC, overseeing the management and monetization of the 

Reorganized Debtor Assets pursuant to the terms of the Reorganized Limited Partnership 

Agreement; and (v) administering the Disputed Claims Reserve and serving as Distribution Agent 

with respect to Disputed Claims in Class 7 or Class 8. 

In its management of the Claimant Trust Assets, the Claimant Trust will also reconcile and 

object to the General Unsecured Claims, Subordinated Claims, Class B/C Limited Partnership 

Interests, and Class A Limited Partnership Interests, as provided for in this Plan and the Claimant 

Trust Agreement, and make Trust Distributions to the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries in accordance 

with Treasury Regulation section 301.7701-4(d), with no objective to continue or engage in the 

conduct of a trade or business. 

The purpose of the Reorganized Debtor is discussed at greater length in ARTICLE IV.C. 

4. Purpose of the Litigation Sub-Trust. 

The Litigation Sub-Trust shall be established for the purpose of investigating, prosecuting, 

settling, or otherwise resolving the Estate Claims. Any proceeds therefrom shall be distributed by 

the Litigation Sub-Trust to the Claimant Trust for distribution to the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries 

pursuant to the terms of the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

5. Claimant Trust Agreement and Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement. 

The Claimant Trust Agreement generally will provide for, among other things: 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 124 of

161

Appx. 0144

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 125 of 162 PageID 198

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 125 of 162

000229

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 198 of 235 PageID 291
28 

(i) the payment of the Claimant Trust Expenses; 

(ii) the payment of other reasonable expenses of the Claimant Trust; 

(iii) the retention of employees, counsel, accountants, financial advisors, or other 

professionals and the payment of their reasonable compensation; 

(iv) the investment of Cash by the Claimant Trustee within certain limitations, 

including those specified in the Plan; 

(v) the orderly monetization of the Claimant Trust Assets; 

(vi) litigation of any Causes of Action, which may include the prosecution, 

settlement, abandonment, or dismissal of any such Causes of Action, subject to reporting and 

oversight by the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee; 

(vii) the resolution of Claims and Equity Interests in Class 8 through Class 11, 

subject to reporting and oversight by the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee; 

(viii) the administration of the Disputed Claims Reserve and distributions to be made 

therefrom; and 

(ix) the management of the Reorganized Debtor, including the utilization of a SubServicer, with the Claimant Trust serving as the managing member of New GP LLC. 

Except as otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court, the Claimant Trust Expenses shall 

be paid from the Claimant Trust Assets in accordance with the Plan and Claimant Trust Agreement. 

The Claimant Trustee may establish a reserve for the payment of Claimant Trust Expense 

(including, without limitation, any reserve for potential indemnification claims as authorized and 

provided under the Claimant Trust Agreement), and shall periodically replenish such reserve, as 

necessary. 

In furtherance of, and consistent with the purpose of, the Claimant Trust and the Plan, the 

Trustees, for the benefit of the Claimant Trust, shall, subject to reporting and oversight by the 

Claimant Trust Oversight Committee as set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement: (i) hold the 

Claimant Trust Assets for the benefit of the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries, (ii) make Distributions 

to the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries as provided herein and in the Claimant Trust Agreement, and 

(iii) have the sole power and authority to prosecute and resolve any Causes of Action and 

objections to Claims and Equity Interests (other than those assigned to the Litigation Sub-Trust), 

without approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Except as otherwise provided in the Claimant Trust 

Agreement, the Claimant Trustee shall be responsible for all decisions and duties with respect to 

the Claimant Trust and the Claimant Trust Assets; provided, however, that the prosecution and 

resolution of any Estate Claims included in the Claimant Trust Assets shall be the responsibility 

of the Litigation Trustee. The Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement generally will provide for, among 

other things: 

(i) the payment of other reasonable expenses of the Litigation Sub-Trust; 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 125 of

161

Appx. 0145

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 126 of 162 PageID 199

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 126 of 162

000230

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 199 of 235 PageID 292
29 

(ii) the retention of employees, counsel, accountants, financial advisors, or other 

professionals and the payment of their reasonable compensation; and 

(iii) the investigation and prosecution of Estate Claims, which may include the 

prosecution, settlement, abandonment, or dismissal of any such Estate Claims, subject to reporting 

and oversight as set forth in the Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement. 

The Trustees, on behalf of the Claimant Trust and Litigation Sub-Trust, as applicable, may 

each employ, without further order of the Bankruptcy Court, employees and other professionals 

(including those previously retained by the Debtor and the Committee) to assist in carrying out the 

Trustees’ duties hereunder and may compensate and reimburse the reasonable expenses of these 

professionals without further Order of the Bankruptcy Court from the Claimant Trust Assets in 

accordance with the Plan and the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

The Claimant Trust Agreement and Litigation Sub-Trust Agreement may include 

reasonable and customary provisions that allow for indemnification by the Claimant Trust in favor 

of the Claimant Trustee, Litigation Trustee, and the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee. Any 

such indemnification shall be the sole responsibility of the Claimant Trust and payable solely from 

the Claimant Trust Assets. 

6. Compensation and Duties of Trustees. 

The salient terms of each Trustee’s employment, including such Trustee’s duties and 

compensation shall be set forth in the Claimant Trust Agreement and the Litigation Sub-Trust 

Agreement, as appropriate. The Trustees shall each be entitled to reasonable compensation in an 

amount consistent with that of similar functionaries in similar types of bankruptcy cases. 

7. Cooperation of Debtor and Reorganized Debtor. 

To effectively investigate, prosecute, compromise and/or settle the Claims and/or Causes 

of Action that constitute Claimant Trust Assets (including Estate Claims), the Claimant Trustee, 

Litigation Trustee, and each of their professionals may require reasonable access to the Debtor’s 

and Reorganized Debtor’s documents, information, and work product relating to the Claimant 

Trust Assets. Accordingly, the Debtor and the Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, shall reasonably 

cooperate with the Claimant Trustee and Litigation Trustee, as applicable, in their prosecution of 

Causes of Action and in providing the Claimant Trustee and Litigation Trustee with copies of 

documents and information in the Debtor’s possession, custody, or control on the Effective Date 

that either Trustee indicates relates to the Estate Claims or other Causes of Action. 

The Debtor and Reorganized Debtor shall preserve all records, documents or work product 

(including all electronic records, documents, or work product) related to the Claims and Causes of 

Action, including Estate Claims, until the earlier of (a) the dissolution of the Reorganized Debtor 

or (b) termination of the Claimant Trust and Litigation Sub-Trust. 

8. United States Federal Income Tax Treatment of the Claimant Trust. 

Unless the IRS requires otherwise, for all United States federal income tax purposes, the 

parties shall treat the transfer of the Claimant Trust Assets to the Claimant Trust as: (a) a transfer 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 126 of

161

Appx. 0146

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 127 of 162 PageID 200

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 127 of 162

000231

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 200 of 235 PageID 293
30 

of the Claimant Trust Assets (other than the amounts set aside in the Disputed Claims Reserve, if 

the Claimant Trustee makes the election described in Section 7 below) directly to the applicable 

Claimant Trust Beneficiaries followed by (b) the transfer by the such Claimant Trust Beneficiaries 

to the Claimant Trust of such Claimant Trust Assets in exchange for the Claimant Trust Interests. 

Accordingly, the applicable Claimant Trust Beneficiaries shall be treated for United States federal 

income tax purposes as the grantors and owners of their respective share of the Claimant Trust 

Assets. The foregoing treatment shall also apply, to the extent permitted by applicable law, for 

state and local income tax purposes. 

9. Tax Reporting. 

(a) The Claimant Trustee shall file tax returns for the Claimant Trust treating the Claimant 

Trust as a grantor trust pursuant to Treasury Regulation section 1.671-4(a). The Claimant Trustee 

may file an election pursuant to Treasury Regulation 1.468B-9(c) to treat the Disputed Claims 

Reserve as a disputed ownership fund, in which case the Claimant Trustee will file federal income 

tax returns and pay taxes for the Disputed Claims Reserve as a separate taxable entity. 

(b) The Claimant Trustee shall be responsible for payment, out of the Claimant Trust 

Assets, of any taxes imposed on the Claimant Trust or its assets. 

(c) The Claimant Trustee shall determine the fair market value of the Claimant Trust Assets 

as of the Effective Date and notify the applicable Claimant Trust Beneficiaries of such valuation, 

and such valuation shall be used consistently for all federal income tax purposes. 

(d) The Claimant Trustee shall distribute such tax information to the applicable Claimant 

Trust Beneficiaries as the Claimant Trustee determines is required by applicable law. 

10. Claimant Trust Assets. 

The Claimant Trustee shall have the exclusive right, on behalf of the Claimant Trust, to 

institute, file, prosecute, enforce, abandon, settle, compromise, release, or withdraw any and all 

Causes of Action included in the Claimant Trust Assets (except for the Estate Claims) without any 

further order of the Bankruptcy Court, and the Claimant Trustee shall have the exclusive right, on 

behalf of the Claimant Trust, to sell, liquidate, or otherwise monetize all Claimant Trust Assets, 

except as otherwise provided in this Plan or in the Claimant Trust Agreement, without any further 

order of the Bankruptcy Court. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Litigation 

Trustee shall have the exclusive right to institute, file, prosecute, enforce, abandon, settle, 

compromise, release, or withdraw any and all Estate Claims included in the Claimant Trust Assets 

without any further order of the Bankruptcy Court. 

From and after the Effective Date, the Trustees, in accordance with section 1123(b)(3) and 

(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, and on behalf of the Claimant Trust, shall each serve as a 

representative of the Estate with respect to any and all Claimant Trust Assets, including the Causes 

of Action and Estate Claims, as appropriate, and shall retain and possess the right to (a) commence, 

pursue, settle, compromise, or abandon, as appropriate, any and all Causes of Action in any court 

or other tribunal and (b) sell, liquidate, or otherwise monetize all Claimant Trust Assets. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 127 of

161

Appx. 0147

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 128 of 162 PageID 201

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 128 of 162

000232

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 201 of 235 PageID 294
31 

11. Claimant Trust Expenses. 

From and after the Effective Date, the Claimant Trust shall, in the ordinary course of 

business and without the necessity of any approval by the Bankruptcy Court, pay the reasonable 

professional fees and expenses incurred by the Claimant Trust, the Litigation Sub-Trust, and any 

professionals retained by such parties and entities from the Claimant Trust Assets, except as 

otherwise provided in the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

12. Trust Distributions to Claimant Trust Beneficiaries. 

The Claimant Trustee, in its discretion, may make Trust Distributions to the Claimant Trust 

Beneficiaries at any time and/or use the Claimant Trust Assets or proceeds thereof, provided that 

such Trust Distributions or use is otherwise permitted under the terms of the Plan, the Claimant 

Trust Agreement, and applicable law. 

13. Cash Investments. 

With the consent of the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee, the Claimant Trustee may 

invest Cash (including any earnings thereon or proceeds therefrom) in a manner consistent with 

the terms of the Claimant Trust Agreement; provided, however, that such investments are 

investments permitted to be made by a “liquidating trust” within the meaning of Treasury 

Regulation section 301.7701-4(d), as reflected therein, or under applicable IRS guidelines, rulings 

or other controlling authorities. 

14. Dissolution of the Claimant Trust and Litigation Sub-Trust. 

The Trustees and the Claimant Trust and Litigation Sub-Trust shall be discharged or 

dissolved, as the case may be, at such time as: (a) the Litigation Trustee determines that the pursuit 

of Estate Claims is not likely to yield sufficient additional proceeds to justify further pursuit of 

such Estate Claims, (b) the Claimant Trustee determines that the pursuit of Causes of Action (other 

than Estate Claims) is not likely to yield sufficient additional proceeds to justify further pursuit of 

such Causes of Action, (c) the Clamant Trustee determines that the pursuit of sales of other 

Claimant Trust Assets is not likely to yield sufficient additional proceeds to justify further pursuit 

of such sales of Claimant Trust Assets, (d) all objections to Disputed Claims and Equity Interests 

are fully resolved, (e) the Reorganized Debtor is dissolved, and (f) all Distributions required to be 

made by the Claimant Trustee to the Claimant Trust Beneficiaries under the Plan have been made, 

but in no event shall the Claimant Trust be dissolved later than three years from the Effective Date 

unless the Bankruptcy Court, upon motion made within the six-month period before such third 

anniversary (and, in the event of further extension, by order of the Bankruptcy Court, upon motion 

made at least six months before the end of the preceding extension), determines that a fixed period 

extension (not to exceed two years, together with any prior extensions, without a favorable letter 

ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion of counsel that any further extension would 

not adversely affect the status of the Claimant Trust as a liquidating trust for federal income tax 

purposes) is necessary to facilitate or complete the recovery on, and liquidation of, the Claimant 

Trust Assets; provided, however, that each extension must be approved, upon a finding that the 

extension is necessary to facilitate or complete the recovery on, and liquidation of the Claimant 

Trust Assets, by the Bankruptcy Court within 6 months of the beginning of the extended term and 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 128 of

161

Appx. 0148

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 129 of 162 PageID 202

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 129 of 162

000233

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 202 of 235 PageID 295
32 

no extension, together with any prior extensions, shall exceed three years without a favorable letter 

ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion of counsel that any further extension would 

not adversely affect the status of the Claimant Trust as a liquidating trust for federal income tax 

purposes. 

Upon dissolution of the Claimant Trust, and pursuant to the Claimant Trust Agreement, 

any remaining Claimant Trust Assets that exceed the amounts required to be paid under the Plan 

will be transferred (in the sole discretion of the Claimant Trustee) in Cash or in-kind to the Holders 

of the Claimant Trust Interests as provided in the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

C. The Reorganized Debtor 

1. Corporate Existence 

The Debtor will continue to exist after the Effective Date, with all of the powers of 

partnerships pursuant to the law of the State of Delaware and as set forth in the Reorganized 

Limited Partnership Agreement. 

2. Cancellation of Equity Interests and Release 

On the Effective Date, (i) all prepetition Equity Interests, including the Class A Limited 

Partnership Interests and the Class B/C Limited Partnership Interests, in the Debtor shall be 

canceled, and (ii) all obligations or debts owed by, or Claims against, the Debtor on account of, or 

based upon, the Interests shall be deemed as cancelled, released, and discharged, including all 

obligations or duties by the Debtor relating to the Equity Interests in any of the Debtor’s formation 

documents, including the Limited Partnership Agreement. 

3. Issuance of New Partnership Interests 

On the Effective Date, the Debtor or the Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, will issue new 

Class A Limited Partnership Interests to (i) the Claimant Trust, as limited partner, and (ii) New 

GP LLC, as general partner, and will admit (a) the Claimant Trust as the limited partner of the 

Reorganized Debtor, and (b) New GP LLC as the general partner of the Reorganized Debtor. The 

Claimant Trust, as limited partner, will ratify New GP LLC’s appointment as general partner of 

the Reorganized Debtor. Also, on the Effective Date, the Claimant Trust, as limited partner, and 

New GP LLC, as general partner, will execute the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement 

and receive partnership interests in the Reorganized Debtor consistent with the terms of the 

Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement. 

The Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement does not provide for, and specifically 

disclaims, the indemnification obligations under the Limited Partnership Agreement, including 

any such indemnification obligations that accrued or arose or could have been brought prior to the 

Effective Date. Any indemnification Claims under the Limited Partnership Agreement that 

accrued, arose, or could have been filed prior to the Effective Date will be resolved through the 

Claims resolution process provided that a Claim is properly filed in accordance with the 

Bankruptcy Code, the Plan, or the Bar Date Order. Each of the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, 

the Claimant Trust, and the Litigation Sub-Trust reserve all rights with respect to any such 

indemnification Claims. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 129 of

161

Appx. 0149

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 130 of 162 PageID 203

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 130 of 162

000234

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 203 of 235 PageID 296
33 

4. Management of the Reorganized Debtor 

Subject to and consistent with the terms of the Reorganized Limited Partnership 

Agreement, the Reorganized Debtor shall be managed by its general partner, New GP LLC. The 

initial officers and employees of the Reorganized Debtor shall be selected by the Claimant Trustee. 

The Reorganized Debtor may, in its discretion, also utilize a Sub-Servicer in addition to or in lieu 

of the retention of officers and employees. 

As set forth in the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, New GP LLC will receive 

a fee for managing the Reorganized Debtor. Although New GP LLC will be a limited liability 

company, it will elect to be treated as a C-Corporation for tax purposes. Therefore, New GP LLC 

(and any taxable income attributable to it) will be subject to corporate income taxation on a 

standalone basis, which may reduce the return to Claimants. 

5. Vesting of Assets in the Reorganized Debtor 

Except as otherwise provided in this Plan or the Confirmation Order, on or after the 

Effective Date, all Reorganized Debtor Assets will vest in the Reorganized Debtor, free and clear 

of all Liens, Claims, charges or other encumbrances pursuant to section 1141(c) of the Bankruptcy 

Code except with respect to such Liens, Claims, charges and other encumbrances that are 

specifically preserved under this Plan upon the Effective Date. 

The Reorganized Debtor shall be the exclusive trustee of the Reorganized Debtor Assets 

for purposes of 31 U.S.C. § 3713(b) and 26 U.S.C. § 6012(b)(3), as well as the representative of 

the Estate appointed pursuant to section 1123(b)(3)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code with respect to the 

Reorganized Debtor Assets. 

6. Purpose of the Reorganized Debtor 

Except as may be otherwise provided in this Plan or the Confirmation Order, the 

Reorganized Debtor will continue to manage the Reorganized Debtor Assets (which shall include, 

for the avoidance of doubt, serving as the investment manager of the Managed Funds) and may 

use, acquire or dispose of the Reorganized Debtor Assets and compromise or settle any Claims 

with respect to the Reorganized Debtor Assets without supervision or approval by the Bankruptcy 

Court and free of any restrictions of the Bankruptcy Code or Bankruptcy Rules. The Reorganized 

Debtor shall oversee the resolution of Claims in Class 1 through Class 7. 

Without limiting the foregoing, the Reorganized Debtor will pay the charges that it incurs 

after the Effective Date for Professionals’ fees, disbursements, expenses or related support services 

(including reasonable fees relating to the preparation of Professional fee applications) in the 

ordinary course of business and without application or notice to, or order of, the Bankruptcy Court. 

7. Distribution of Proceeds from the Reorganized Debtor Assets; Transfer of 

Reorganized Debtor Assets 

Any proceeds received by the Reorganized Debtor will be distributed to the Claimant Trust, 

as limited partner, and New GP LLC, as general partner, in the manner set forth in the Reorganized 

Limited Partnership Agreement. As set forth in the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 130 of

161

Appx. 0150

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 131 of 162 PageID 204

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 131 of 162

000235

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 204 of 235 PageID 297
34 

the Reorganized Debtor may, from time to time distribute Reorganized Debtor Assets to the 

Claimant Trust either in Cash or in-kind, including to institute the wind-down and dissolution of 

the Reorganized Debtor. Any assets distributed to the Claimant Trust will be (i) deemed 

transferred in all respects as forth in ARTICLE IV.B.1, (ii) deemed Claimant Trust Assets, and 

(iii) administered as Claimant Trust Assets. 

D. Company Action 

Each of the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, and the Trustees, as applicable, may take any 

and all actions to execute, deliver, File or record such contracts, instruments, releases and other 

agreements or documents and take such actions as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate 

and implement the provisions of this Plan, the Claimant Trust Agreement, the Reorganized Limited 

Partnership Agreement, or the New GP LLC Documents, as applicable, in the name of and on 

behalf of the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Trustees, as applicable, and in each case 

without further notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court, act or action under applicable law, 

regulation, order, or rule or any requirement of further action, vote or other approval or 

authorization by the security holders, officers, or directors of the Debtor or the Reorganized 

Debtor, as applicable, or by any other Person. 

Prior to, on or after the Effective Date (as appropriate), all matters provided for pursuant 

to this Plan that would otherwise require approval of the stockholders, partners, directors, 

managers, or members of the Debtor, any Related Entity, or any Affiliate thereof (as of prior to 

the Effective Date) will be deemed to have been so approved and will be in effect prior to, on or 

after the Effective Date (as appropriate) pursuant to applicable law and without any requirement 

of further action by the stockholders, partners, directors, managers or members of such Persons, 

or the need for any approvals, authorizations, actions or consents of any Person. 

All matters provided for in this Plan involving the legal or corporate structure of the Debtor, 

the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, and any legal or corporate action 

required by the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, in connection 

with this Plan, will be deemed to have occurred and will be in full force and effect in all respects, 

in each case without further notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court, act or action under 

applicable law, regulation, order, or rule or any requirement of further action, vote or other 

approval or authorization by the security holders, partners, directors, managers, or members of the 

Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, or by any other Person. On 

the Effective Date, the appropriate officers of the Debtor and the Reorganized Debtor, as 

applicable, as well as the Trustees, are authorized to issue, execute, deliver, and consummate the 

transactions contemplated by, the contracts, agreements, documents, guarantees, pledges, 

consents, securities, certificates, resolutions and instruments contemplated by or described in this 

Plan in the name of and on behalf of the Debtor and the Reorganized Debtor, as well as the 

Trustees, in each case without further notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court, act or action 

under applicable law, regulation, order, or rule or any requirement of further action, vote or other 

approval or authorization by any Person. The appropriate officer of the Debtor, the Reorganized 

Debtor, as well as the Trustees, will be authorized to certify or attest to any of the foregoing actions. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 131 of

161

Appx. 0151

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 132 of 162 PageID 205

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 132 of 162

000236

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 205 of 235 PageID 298
35 

E. Release of Liens, Claims and Equity Interests 

Except as otherwise provided in the Plan or in any contract, instrument, release or other 

agreement or document entered into or delivered in connection with the Plan, from and after the 

Effective Date and concurrently with the applicable distributions made pursuant to the Plan, all 

Liens, Claims, Equity Interests, mortgages, deeds of trust, or other security interests against the 

property of the Estate will be fully released, terminated, extinguished and discharged, in each case 

without further notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court, act or action under applicable law, 

regulation, order, or rule or the vote, consent, authorization or approval of any Entity. Any Entity 

holding such Liens or Equity Interests extinguished pursuant to the prior sentence will, pursuant 

to section 1142 of the Bankruptcy Code, promptly execute and deliver to the Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee, as applicable, such instruments of termination, 

release, satisfaction and/or assignment (in recordable form) as may be reasonably requested by the 

Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee, as applicable. For the avoidance of 

doubt, this section is in addition to, and shall not be read to limit in any respects, ARTICLE IV.C.2. 

F. Cancellation of Notes, Certificates and Instruments 

Except for the purpose of evidencing a right to a distribution under this Plan and except as 

otherwise set forth in this Plan, on the Effective Date, all agreements, instruments, Securities and 

other documents evidencing any prepetition Claim or Equity Interest and any rights of any Holder 

in respect thereof shall be deemed cancelled, discharged, and of no force or effect. The holders of 

or parties to such cancelled instruments, Securities, and other documentation will have no rights 

arising from or related to such instruments, Securities, or other documentation or the cancellation 

thereof, except the rights provided for pursuant to this Plan, and the obligations of the Debtor 

thereunder or in any way related thereto will be fully released, terminated, extinguished and 

discharged, in each case without further notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court, act or action 

under applicable law, regulation, order, or rule or any requirement of further action, vote or other 

approval or authorization by any Person. For the avoidance of doubt, this section is in addition to, 

and shall not be read to limit in any respects, ARTICLE IV.C.2. 

G. Cancellation of Existing Instruments Governing Security Interests 

Upon payment or other satisfaction of an Allowed Class 1 or Allowed Class 2 Claim, or 

promptly thereafter, the Holder of such Allowed Class 1 or Allowed Class 2 Claim shall deliver to 

the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee, as applicable, any collateral or other 

property of the Debtor held by such Holder, together with any termination statements, instruments 

of satisfaction, or releases of all security interests with respect to its Allowed Class 1 or Allowed 

Class 2 Claim that may be reasonably required to terminate any related financing statements, 

mortgages, mechanics’ or other statutory Liens, or lis pendens, or similar interests or documents. 

H. Control Provisions 

To the extent that there is any inconsistency between this Plan as it relates to the Claimant 

Trust, the Claimant Trust Agreement, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Reorganized Limited 

Partnership Agreement, this Plan shall control. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 132 of

161

Appx. 0152

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 133 of 162 PageID 206

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 133 of 162

000237

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 206 of 235 PageID 299
36 

I. Treatment of Vacant Classes

Any Claim or Equity Interest in a Class considered vacant under ARTICLE III.C of this 

Plan shall receive no Plan Distributions. 

J. Plan Documents 

The documents, if any, to be Filed as part of the Plan Documents, including any documents 

filed with the Plan Supplement, and any amendments, restatements, supplements, or other 

modifications to such documents, and any consents, waivers, or other deviations under or from 

any such documents, shall be incorporated herein by this reference (including to the applicable 

definitions in ARTICLE I hereof) and fully enforceable as if stated in full herein. 

The Debtor and the Committee are currently working to finalize the forms of certain of the 

Plan Documents to be filed with the Plan Supplement. To the extent that the Debtor and the 

Committee cannot agree as to the form and content of such Plan Documents, they intend to submit 

the issue to non-binding mediation pursuant to the Order Directing Mediation entered on August 

3, 2020 [D.I. 912]. 

K. Highland Capital Management, L.P. Retirement Plan and Trust 

The Highland Capital Management, L.P. Retirement Plan And Trust (“Pension Plan”) is a 

single-employer defined benefit pension plan covered by Title IV of the Employee Retirement 

Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). 29 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1461. The Debtor is 

the contributing sponsor and, as such, the PBGC asserts that the Debtor is liable along with any 

members of the contributing sponsor’s controlled-group within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. §§ 

1301(a)(13), (14) with respect to the Pension Plan. 

Upon the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtor shall be deemed to have assumed the 

Pension Plan and shall comply with all applicable statutory provisions of ERISA and the Internal 

Revenue Code (the “IRC”), including, but not limited to, satisfying the minimum funding 

standards pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 412, 430, and 29 U.S.C. §§ 1082, 1083; paying the PBGC 

premiums in accordance with 29 U.S.C. §§ 1306 and 1307; and administering the Pension Plan in 

accordance with its terms and the provisions of ERISA and the IRC. In the event that the Pension 

Plan terminates after the Plan of Reorganization Effective Date, the PBGC asserts that the 

Reorganized Debtor and each of its controlled group members will be responsible for the liabilities 

imposed by Title IV of ERISA. 

Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or the Bankruptcy 

Code (including section 1141 thereof) to the contrary, neither the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or 

the Bankruptcy Code shall be construed as discharging, releasing, exculpating or relieving the 

Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or any person or entity in any capacity, from any liability or 

responsibility, if any, with respect to the Pension Plan under any law, governmental policy, or 

regulatory provision. PBGC and the Pension Plan shall not be enjoined or precluded from 

enforcing such liability or responsibility against any person or entity as a result of any of the 

provisions of the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtor reserves the 

right to contest any such liability or responsibility. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 133 of

161

Appx. 0153

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 134 of 162 PageID 207

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 134 of 162

000238

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 207 of 235 PageID 300
37 

ARTICLE V.

TREATMENT OF EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES 

A. Assumption, Assignment, or Rejection of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases 

Unless an Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease: (i) was previously assumed or rejected 

by the Debtor pursuant to this Plan on or prior to the Confirmation Date; (ii) previously expired or 

terminated pursuant to its own terms or by agreement of the parties thereto; (iii) is the subject of a 

motion to assume filed by the Debtor on or before the Confirmation Date; (iv) contains a change 

of control or similar provision that would be triggered by the Chapter 11 Case (unless such 

provision has been irrevocably waived); or (v) is specifically designated as a contract or lease to 

be assumed in the Plan or the Plan Supplement, on the Confirmation Date, each Executory Contract 

and Unexpired Lease shall be deemed rejected pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, 

without the need for any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court, 

unless such Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease is listed in the Plan Supplement. 

At any time on or prior to the Confirmation Date, the Debtor may (i) amend the Plan 

Supplement in order to add or remove a contract or lease from the list of contracts to be assumed 

or (ii) assign (subject to applicable law) any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease, as determined 

by the Debtor in consultation with the Committee, or the Reorganized Debtor, as applicable. 

The Confirmation Order will constitute an order of the Bankruptcy Court approving the 

above-described assumptions, rejections, and assumptions and assignments. Except as otherwise 

provided herein or agreed to by the Debtor and the applicable counterparty, each assumed 

Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease shall include all modifications, amendments, supplements, 

restatements, or other agreements related thereto, and all rights related thereto. Modifications, 

amendments, supplements, and restatements to prepetition Executory Contracts and Unexpired 

Leases that have been executed by the Debtor during the Chapter 11 Case shall not be deemed to 

alter the prepetition nature of the Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease or the validity, priority, 

or amount of any Claims that may arise in connection therewith. To the extent applicable, no 

change of control (or similar provision) will be deemed to occur under any such Executory 

Contract or Unexpired Lease. 

If certain, but not all, of a contract counterparty’s Executory Contracts and/or Unexpired 

Leases are rejected pursuant to the Plan, the Confirmation Order shall be a determination that such 

counterparty’s Executory Contracts and/or Unexpired Leases that are being assumed pursuant to 

the Plan are severable agreements that are not integrated with those Executory Contracts and/or 

Unexpired Leases that are being rejected pursuant to the Plan. Parties seeking to contest this 

finding with respect to their Executory Contracts and/or Unexpired Leases must file a timely 

objection to the Plan on the grounds that their agreements are integrated and not severable, and 

any such dispute shall be resolved by the Bankruptcy Court at the Confirmation Hearing (to the 

extent not resolved by the parties prior to the Confirmation Hearing). 

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Debtor shall assume or reject that 

certain real property lease with Crescent TC Investors L.P. (“Landlord”) for the Debtor’s 

headquarters located at 200/300 Crescent Ct., Suite #700, Dallas, Texas 75201 (the “Lease”) in 

accordance with the notice to Landlord, procedures and timing required by 11 U.S.C. §365(d)(4), 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 134 of

161

Appx. 0154

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 135 of 162 PageID 208

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 135 of 162

000239

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 208 of 235 PageID 301
38 

as modified by that certain Agreed Order Granting Motion to Extend Time to Assume or Reject 

Unexpired Nonresidential Real Property Lease [Docket No. 1122]. 

B. Claims Based on Rejection of Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases 

Any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease not assumed or rejected on or before the 

Confirmation Date shall be deemed rejected, pursuant to the Confirmation Order. Any Person 

asserting a Rejection Claim shall File a proof of claim within thirty days of the Confirmation Date. 

Any Rejection Claims that are not timely Filed pursuant to this Plan shall be forever disallowed 

and barred. If one or more Rejection Claims are timely Filed, the Claimant Trustee may File an 

objection to any Rejection Claim. 

Rejection Claims shall be classified as General Unsecured Claims and shall be treated in 

accordance with ARTICLE III of this Plan. 

C. Cure of Defaults for Assumed or Assigned Executory Contracts and Unexpired 

Leases 

Any monetary amounts by which any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease to be 

assumed or assigned hereunder is in default shall be satisfied, under section 365(b)(1) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, by the Debtor upon assumption or assignment thereof, by payment of the default 

amount in Cash as and when due in the ordinary course or on such other terms as the parties to 

such Executory Contracts may otherwise agree. The Debtor may serve a notice on the Committee 

and parties to Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases to be assumed or assigned reflecting the 

Debtor’s or Reorganized Debtor’s intention to assume or assign the Executory Contract or 

Unexpired Lease in connection with this Plan and setting forth the proposed cure amount (if any). 

If a dispute regarding (1) the amount of any payments to cure a default, (2) the ability of 

the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or any assignee to provide “adequate assurance of future 

performance” (within the meaning of section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code) under the Executory 

Contract or Unexpired Lease to be assumed or assigned or (3) any other matter pertaining to 

assumption or assignment, the cure payments required by section 365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy 

Code will be made following the entry of a Final Order or orders resolving the dispute and 

approving the assumption or assignment. 

Assumption or assignment of any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease pursuant to the 

Plan or otherwise and full payment of any applicable cure amounts pursuant to this ARTICLE V.C 

shall result in the full release and satisfaction of any cure amounts, Claims, or defaults, whether 

monetary or nonmonetary, including defaults of provisions restricting the change in control or 

ownership interest composition or other bankruptcy-related defaults, arising under any assumed or 

assigned Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease at any time prior to the effective date of 

assumption or assignment. Any and all Proofs of Claim based upon Executory Contracts or 

Unexpired Leases that have been assumed or assigned in the Chapter 11 Case, including pursuant 

to the Confirmation Order, and for which any cure amounts have been fully paid pursuant to this 

ARTICLE V.C, shall be deemed disallowed and expunged as of the Confirmation Date without 

the need for any objection thereto or any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the 

Bankruptcy Court. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 135 of

161

Appx. 0155

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 136 of 162 PageID 209

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 136 of 162

000240

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 209 of 235 PageID 302
39 

ARTICLE VI.

PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISTRIBUTIONS 

A. Dates of Distributions 

Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, on the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably 

practicable thereafter (or if a Claim is not an Allowed Claim or Equity Interest on the Effective 

Date, on the date that such Claim or Equity Interest becomes an Allowed Claim or Equity Interest, 

or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter), each Holder of an Allowed Claim or Equity 

Interest against the Debtor shall receive the full amount of the distributions that this Plan provides 

for Allowed Claims or Allowed Equity Interests in the applicable Class and in the manner provided 

herein. If any payment or act under this Plan is required to be made or performed on a date that is 

not on a Business Day, then the making of such payment or the performance of such act may be 

completed on the next succeeding Business Day, but shall be deemed to have been completed as 

of the required date. If and to the extent there are Disputed Claims or Equity Interests, distributions 

on account of any such Disputed Claims or Equity Interests shall be made pursuant to the 

provisions provided in this Plan. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, Holders of Claims and 

Equity Interests shall not be entitled to interest, dividends or accruals on the distributions provided 

for therein, regardless of whether distributions are delivered on or at any time after the Effective 

Date. 

Upon the Effective Date, all Claims and Equity Interests against the Debtor shall be deemed 

fixed and adjusted pursuant to this Plan and none of the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the 

Claimant Trust will have liability on account of any Claims or Equity Interests except as set forth 

in this Plan and in the Confirmation Order. All payments and all distributions made by the 

Distribution Agent under this Plan shall be in full and final satisfaction, settlement and release of 

all Claims and Equity Interests against the Debtor and the Reorganized Debtor. 

At the close of business on the Distribution Record Date, the transfer ledgers for the Claims 

against the Debtor and the Equity Interests in the Debtor shall be closed, and there shall be no 

further changes in the record holders of such Claims and Equity Interests. The Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor, the Trustees, and the Distribution Agent, and each of their respective agents, 

successors, and assigns shall have no obligation to recognize the transfer of any Claims against the 

Debtor or Equity Interests in the Debtor occurring after the Distribution Record Date and shall be 

entitled instead to recognize and deal for all purposes hereunder with only those record holders 

stated on the transfer ledgers as of the close of business on the Distribution Record Date 

irrespective of the number of distributions to be made under this Plan to such Persons or the date 

of such distributions. 

B. Distribution Agent 

Except as provided herein, all distributions under this Plan shall be made by the Claimant 

Trustee, as Distribution Agent, or by such other Entity designated by the Claimant Trustee, as a 

Distribution Agent on the Effective Date or thereafter. The Reorganized Debtor will be the 

Distribution Agent with respect to Claims in Class 1 through Class 7. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 136 of

161

Appx. 0156

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 137 of 162 PageID 210

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 137 of 162

000241

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 210 of 235 PageID 303
40 

The Claimant Trustee, or such other Entity designated by the Claimant Trustee to be the 

Distribution Agent, shall not be required to give any bond or surety or other security for the 

performance of such Distribution Agent’s duties unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy 

Court. 

The Distribution Agent shall be empowered to (a) effect all actions and execute all 

agreements, instruments, and other documents necessary to perform its duties under this Plan; 

(b) make all distributions contemplated hereby; (c) employ professionals to represent it with 

respect to its responsibilities; and (d) exercise such other powers as may be vested in the 

Distribution Agent by order of the Bankruptcy Court, pursuant to this Plan, or as deemed by the 

Distribution Agent to be necessary and proper to implement the provisions hereof. 

The Distribution Agent shall not have any obligation to make a particular distribution to a 

specific Holder of an Allowed Claim if such Holder is also the Holder of a Disputed Claim. 

C. Cash Distributions 

Distributions of Cash may be made by wire transfer from a domestic bank, except that Cash 

payments made to foreign creditors may be made in such funds and by such means as the 

Distribution Agent determines are necessary or customary in a particular foreign jurisdiction. 

D. Disputed Claims Reserve 

On or prior to the Initial Distribution Date, the Claimant Trustee shall establish, fund and 

maintain the Disputed Claims Reserve(s) in the appropriate Disputed Claims Reserve Amounts on 

account of any Disputed Claims. 

E. Distributions from the Disputed Claims Reserve 

The Disputed Claims Reserve shall at all times hold Cash in an amount no less than the 

Disputed Claims Reserve Amount. To the extent a Disputed Claim becomes an Allowed Claim 

pursuant to the terms of this Plan, within 30 days of the date on which such Disputed Claim 

becomes an Allowed Claim pursuant to the terms of this Plan, the Claimant Trustee shall distribute 

from the Disputed Claims Reserve to the Holder thereof any prior distributions, in Cash, that would 

have been made to such Allowed Claim if it had been Allowed as of the Effective Date. For the 

avoidance of doubt, each Holder of a Disputed Claim that subsequently becomes an Allowed 

Claim will also receive its Pro Rata share of the Claimant Trust Interests. If, upon the resolution 

of all Disputed Claims any Cash remains in the Disputed Claims Reserve, such Cash shall be 

transferred to the Claimant Trust and be deemed a Claimant Trust Asset. 

F. Rounding of Payments 

Whenever this Plan would otherwise call for, with respect to a particular Person, payment 

of a fraction of a dollar, the actual payment or distribution shall reflect a rounding of such fraction 

to the nearest whole dollar (up or down), with half dollars being rounded down. To the extent that 

Cash to be distributed under this Plan remains undistributed as a result of the aforementioned 

rounding, such Cash or stock shall be treated as “Unclaimed Property” under this Plan. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 137 of

161

Appx. 0157

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 138 of 162 PageID 211

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 138 of 162

000242

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 211 of 235 PageID 304
41 

G. De Minimis Distribution 

Except as to any Allowed Claim that is Unimpaired under this Plan, none of the Debtor, 

the Reorganized Debtor, or the Distribution Agent shall have any obligation to make any Plan 

Distributions with a value of less than $100, unless a written request therefor is received by the 

Distribution Agent from the relevant recipient at the addresses set forth in ARTICLE VI.J hereof 

within 120 days after the later of the (i) Effective Date and (ii) the date such Claim becomes an 

Allowed Claim. De minimis distributions for which no such request is timely received shall revert 

to the Claimant Trust. Upon such reversion, the relevant Allowed Claim (and any Claim on 

account of missed distributions) shall be automatically deemed satisfied, discharged and forever 

barred, notwithstanding any federal or state escheat laws to the contrary. 

H. Distributions on Account of Allowed Claims 

Except as otherwise agreed by the Holder of a particular Claim or as provided in this Plan, 

all distributions shall be made pursuant to the terms of this Plan and the Confirmation Order. 

Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, distributions to any Holder of an Allowed Claim shall, 

to the extent applicable, be allocated first to the principal amount of any such Allowed Claim, as 

determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes and then, to the extent the consideration exceeds 

such amount, to the remainder of such Claim comprising accrued but unpaid interest, if any (but 

solely to the extent that interest is an allowable portion of such Allowed Claim). 

I. General Distribution Procedures 

The Distribution Agent shall make all distributions of Cash or other property required 

under this Plan, unless this Plan specifically provides otherwise. All Cash and other property held 

by the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, for ultimate 

distribution under this Plan shall not be subject to any claim by any Person. 

J. Address for Delivery of Distributions 

Distributions to Holders of Allowed Claims, to the extent provided for under this Plan, 

shall be made (1) at the addresses set forth in any written notices of address change delivered to 

the Debtor and the Distribution Agent; (2) at the address set forth on any Proofs of Claim Filed by 

such Holders (to the extent such Proofs of Claim are Filed in the Chapter 11 Case), (2), or (3) at 

the addresses in the Debtor’s books and records. 

If there is any conflict or discrepancy between the addresses set forth in (1) through (3) in 

the foregoing sentence, then (i) the address in Section (2) shall control; (ii) if (2) does not apply, 

the address in (1) shall control, and (iii) if (1) does not apply, the address in (3) shall control. 

K. Undeliverable Distributions and Unclaimed Property 

If the distribution to the Holder of any Allowed Claim is returned to the Reorganized 

Debtor or the Claimant Trust as undeliverable, no further distribution shall be made to such Holder, 

and Distribution Agent shall not have any obligation to make any further distribution to the Holder, 

unless and until the Distribution Agent is notified in writing of such Holder’s then current address. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 138 of

161

Appx. 0158

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 139 of 162 PageID 212

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 139 of 162

000243

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 212 of 235 PageID 305
42 

Any Entity that fails to claim any Cash within six months from the date upon which a 

distribution is first made to such Entity shall forfeit all rights to any distribution under this Plan 

and such Cash shall thereafter be deemed an Claimant Trust Asset in all respects and for all 

purposes. Entities that fail to claim Cash shall forfeit their rights thereto and shall have no claim 

whatsoever against the Debtor’s Estate, the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trust, or against 

any Holder of an Allowed Claim to whom distributions are made by the Distribution Agent. 

L. Withholding Taxes 

In connection with this Plan, to the extent applicable, the Distribution Agent shall comply 

with all tax withholding and reporting requirements imposed on them by any Governmental Unit, 

and all distributions made pursuant to this Plan shall be subject to such withholding and reporting 

requirements. The Distribution Agent shall be entitled to deduct any U.S. federal, state or local 

withholding taxes from any Cash payments made with respect to Allowed Claims, as appropriate. 

As a condition to receiving any distribution under this Plan, the Distribution Agent may require 

that the Holder of an Allowed Claim entitled to receive a distribution pursuant to this Plan provide 

such Holder’s taxpayer identification number and such other information and certification as may 

be deemed necessary for the Distribution Agent to comply with applicable tax reporting and 

withholding laws. If a Holder fails to comply with such a request within one year, such distribution 

shall be deemed an unclaimed distribution. Any amounts withheld pursuant hereto shall be deemed 

to have been distributed to and received by the applicable recipient for all purposes of this Plan. 

M. Setoffs 

The Distribution Agent may, to the extent permitted under applicable law, set off against 

any Allowed Claim and any distributions to be made pursuant to this Plan on account of such 

Allowed Claim, the claims, rights and causes of action of any nature that the Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor, or the Distribution Agent may hold against the Holder of such Allowed Claim 

that are not otherwise waived, released or compromised in accordance with this Plan; provided, 

however, that neither such a setoff nor the allowance of any Claim hereunder shall constitute a 

waiver or release by the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee of any such 

claims, rights and causes of action that the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or Claimant Trustee 

possesses against such Holder. Any Holder of an Allowed Claim subject to such setoff reserves 

the right to challenge any such setoff in the Bankruptcy Court or any other court with jurisdiction 

with respect to such challenge. 

N. Surrender of Cancelled Instruments or Securities 

As a condition precedent to receiving any distribution pursuant to this Plan on account of 

an Allowed Claim evidenced by negotiable instruments, securities, or notes canceled pursuant to 

ARTICLE IV of this Plan, the Holder of such Claim will tender the applicable negotiable 

instruments, securities, or notes evidencing such Claim (or a sworn affidavit identifying the 

negotiable instruments, securities, or notes formerly held by such Holder and certifying that they 

have been lost), to the Distribution Agent unless waived in writing by the Distribution Agent. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 139 of

161

Appx. 0159

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 140 of 162 PageID 213

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 140 of 162

000244

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 213 of 235 PageID 306
43 

O. Lost, Stolen, Mutilated or Destroyed Securities 

In addition to any requirements under any applicable agreement and applicable law, any 

Holder of a Claim or Equity Interest evidenced by a security or note that has been lost, stolen, 

mutilated, or destroyed will, in lieu of surrendering such security or note to the extent required by 

this Plan, deliver to the Distribution Agent: (i) evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Distribution 

Agent of such loss, theft, mutilation, or destruction; and (ii) such security or indemnity as may be 

required by the Distribution Agent to hold such party harmless from any damages, liabilities, or 

costs incurred in treating such individual as a Holder of an Allowed Claim or Equity Interest. 

Upon compliance with ARTICLE VI.O of this Plan as determined by the Distribution Agent, by a 

Holder of a Claim evidenced by a security or note, such Holder will, for all purposes under this 

Plan, be deemed to have surrendered such security or note to the Distribution Agent. 

ARTICLE VII.

PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING CONTINGENT, 

UNLIQUIDATED AND DISPUTED CLAIMS 

A. Filing of Proofs of Claim 

Unless such Claim appeared in the Schedules and is not listed as disputed, contingent, or 

unliquidated, or such Claim has otherwise been Allowed or paid, each Holder of a Claim was 

required to file a Proof of Claim on or prior to the Bar Date. 

B. Disputed Claims 

Following the Effective Date, each of the Reorganized Debtor or the Claimant Trustee, as 

applicable, may File with the Bankruptcy Court an objection to the allowance of any Disputed 

Claim or Disputed Equity Interest, request the Bankruptcy Court subordinate any Claims to 

Subordinated Claims, or any other appropriate motion or adversary proceeding with respect to the 

foregoing by the Claims Objection Deadline or, at the discretion of the Reorganized Debtor or 

Claimant Trustee, as applicable, compromised, settled, withdrew or resolved without further order 

of the Bankruptcy Court, and (ii) unless otherwise provided in the Confirmation Order, the 

Reorganized Debtor or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, are authorized to settle, or withdraw any 

objections to, any Disputed Claim or Disputed Equity Interests following the Effective Date 

without further notice to creditors (other than the Entity holding such Disputed Claim or Disputed 

Equity Interest) or authorization of the Bankruptcy Court, in which event such Claim or Equity 

Interest shall be deemed to be an Allowed Claim or Equity Interest in the amount compromised 

for purposes of this Plan. 

C. Procedures Regarding Disputed Claims or Disputed Equity Interests 

No payment or other distribution or treatment shall be made on account of a Disputed 

Claim or Disputed Equity Interest unless and until such Disputed Claim or Disputed Equity Interest 

becomes an Allowed Claim or Equity Interests and the amount of such Allowed Claim or Equity 

Interest, as applicable, is determined by order of the Bankruptcy Court or by stipulation between 

the Reorganized Debtor or Claimant Trust, as applicable, and the Holder of the Claim or Equity 

Interest. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 140 of

161

Appx. 0160

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 141 of 162 PageID 214

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 141 of 162

000245

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 214 of 235 PageID 307
44 

D. Allowance of Claims and Equity Interests 

Following the date on which a Disputed Claim or Disputed Equity Interest becomes an 

Allowed Claim or Equity Interest after the Distribution Date, the Distribution Agent shall make a 

distribution to the Holder of such Allowed Claim or Equity Interest in accordance with the Plan. 

1. Allowance of Claims 

After the Effective Date and subject to the other provisions of this Plan, the Reorganized 

Debtor or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, will have and will retain any and all rights and 

defenses under bankruptcy or nonbankruptcy law that the Debtor had with respect to any Claim. 

Except as expressly provided in this Plan or in any order entered in the Chapter 11 Case prior to 

the Effective Date (including, without limitation, the Confirmation Order), no Claim or Equity 

Interest will become an Allowed Claim or Equity Interest unless and until such Claim or Equity 

Interest is deemed Allowed under this Plan or the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Court has 

entered an order, including, without limitation, the Confirmation Order, in the Chapter 11 Case 

allowing such Claim or Equity Interest. 

2. Estimation 

Subject to the other provisions of this Plan, the Debtor, prior to the Effective Date, and the 

Reorganized Debtor or the Claimant Trustee, as applicable, after the Effective Date, may, at any 

time, request that the Bankruptcy Court estimate (a) any Disputed Claim or Disputed Equity 

Interest pursuant to applicable law and in accordance with this Plan and (b) any contingent or 

unliquidated Claim pursuant to applicable law, including, without limitation, section 502(c) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, and the Bankruptcy Court will retain jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 

1334 to estimate any Disputed Claim or Disputed Equity Interest, contingent Claim or unliquidated 

Claim, including during the litigation concerning any objection to any Claim or Equity Interest or 

during the pendency of any appeal relating to any such objection. All of the aforementioned 

objection, estimation and resolution procedures are cumulative and not exclusive of one another. 

Claims or Equity Interests may be estimated and subsequently compromised, settled, withdrawn 

or resolved by any mechanism approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The rights and objections of 

all parties are reserved in connection with any such estimation proceeding. 

3. Disallowance of Claims 

Any Claims or Equity Interests held by Entities from which property is recoverable under 

sections 542, 543, 550, or 553 of the Bankruptcy Code, or that are a transferee of a transfer 

avoidable under sections 522(f), 522(h), 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, or 724(a) of the Bankruptcy 

Code, shall be deemed disallowed pursuant to section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, and holders 

of such Claims or Interests may not receive any distributions on account of such Claims or Interests 

until such time as such Causes of Action against that Entity have been settled or a Bankruptcy 

Court Order with respect thereto has been entered and all sums due, if any, to the Reorganized 

Debtor or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, by that Entity have been turned over or paid to the 

Reorganized Debtor or the Claimant Trust, as applicable. 

EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED HEREIN OR AS AGREED TO BY THE 

DEBTOR, REORGANIZED DEBTOR, OR CLAIMANT TRUSTEE, AS APPLICABLE, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 141 of

161

Appx. 0161

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 142 of 162 PageID 215

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 142 of 162

000246

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 215 of 235 PageID 308
45 

ANY AND ALL PROOFS OF CLAIM FILED AFTER THE BAR DATE SHALL BE 

DEEMED DISALLOWED AND EXPUNGED AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE 

WITHOUT ANY FURTHER NOTICE TO OR ACTION, ORDER, OR APPROVAL OF 

THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, AND HOLDERS OF SUCH CLAIMS MAY NOT 

RECEIVE ANY DISTRIBUTIONS ON ACCOUNT OF SUCH CLAIMS, UNLESS SUCH 

LATE PROOF OF CLAIM HAS BEEN DEEMED TIMELY FILED BY A FINAL ORDER.

ARTICLE VIII.

EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS PLAN 

A. Conditions Precedent to the Effective Date 

The Effective Date of this Plan will be conditioned upon the satisfaction or waiver by the 

Debtor (and, to the extent such condition requires the consent of the Committee, the consent of the 

Committee with such consent not to be unreasonably withheld), pursuant to the provisions of 

ARTICLE VIII.B of this Plan of the following: 

x This Plan and the Plan Documents, including the Claimant Trust Agreement and the 

Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, and all schedules, documents, 

supplements and exhibits to this Plan shall have been Filed in form and substance 

reasonably acceptable to the Debtor and the Committee. 

x The Confirmation Order shall have become a Final Order and shall be in form and 

substance reasonably acceptable to the Debtor and the Committee. The Confirmation 

Order shall provide that, among other things, (i) the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, 

the Claimant Trustee, or the Litigation Trustee are authorized to take all actions 

necessary or appropriate to effectuate and consummate this Plan, including, without 

limitation, (a) entering into, implementing, effectuating, and consummating the 

contracts, instruments, releases, and other agreements or documents created in 

connection with or described in this Plan, (b) assuming the Executory Contracts and 

Unexpired Leases set forth in the Plan Supplement, (c) making all distributions and 

issuances as required under this Plan; and (d) entering into any transactions as set forth 

in the Plan Documents; (ii) the provisions of the Confirmation Order and this Plan are 

nonseverable and mutually dependent; (iii) the implementation of this Plan in 

accordance with its terms is authorized; (iv) pursuant to section 1146 of the Bankruptcy 

Code, the delivery of any deed or other instrument or transfer order, in furtherance of, 

or in connection with this Plan, including any deeds, bills of sale, or assignments 

executed in connection with any disposition or transfer of Assets contemplated under 

this Plan, shall not be subject to any Stamp or Similar Tax; and (v) the vesting of the 

Claimant Trust Assets in the Claimant Trust and the Reorganized Debtor Assets in the 

Reorganized Debtor, in each case as of the Effective Date free and clear of liens and 

claims to the fullest extent permissible under applicable law pursuant to section 1141(c) 

of the Bankruptcy Code except with respect to such Liens, Claims, charges and other 

encumbrances that are specifically preserved under this Plan upon the Effective Date. 

x All documents and agreements necessary to implement this Plan, including without 

limitation, the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, the Claimant Trust 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 142 of

161

Appx. 0162

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 143 of 162 PageID 216

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 143 of 162

000247

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 216 of 235 PageID 309
46 

Agreement, and the New GP LLC Documents, in each case in form and substance 

reasonably acceptable to the Debtor and the Committee, shall have (a) been tendered 

for delivery, and (b) been effected by, executed by, or otherwise deemed binding upon, 

all Entities party thereto and shall be in full force and effect. All conditions precedent 

to such documents and agreements shall have been satisfied or waived pursuant to the 

terms of such documents or agreements. 

x All authorizations, consents, actions, documents, approvals (including any 

governmental approvals), certificates and agreements necessary to implement this Plan, 

including, without limitation, the Reorganized Limited Partnership Agreement, the 

Claimant Trust Agreement, and the New GP LLC Documents, shall have been 

obtained, effected or executed and delivered to the required parties and, to the extent 

required, filed with the applicable governmental units in accordance with applicable 

laws and any applicable waiting periods shall have expired without any action being 

taken or threatened by any competent authority that would restrain or prevent 

effectiveness or consummation of the Restructuring. 

x The Debtor shall have obtained applicable directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage 

that is acceptable to each of the Debtor, the Committee, the Claimant Trust Oversight 

Committee, the Claimant Trustee and the Litigation Trustee. 

x The Professional Fee Reserve shall be funded pursuant to this Plan in an amount 

determined by the Debtor in good faith. 

B. Waiver of Conditions 

The conditions to effectiveness of this Plan set forth in this ARTICLE VIII (other than that 

the Confirmation Order shall have been entered) may be waived in whole or in part by the Debtor 

(and, to the extent such condition requires the consent of the Committee, the consent of the 

Committee), without notice, leave or order of the Bankruptcy Court or any formal action other 

than proceeding to confirm or effectuate this Plan. The failure to satisfy or waive a condition to 

the Effective Date may be asserted by the Debtor regardless of the circumstances giving rise to the 

failure of such condition to be satisfied. The failure of the Debtor to exercise any of the foregoing 

rights will not be deemed a waiver of any other rights, and each right will be deemed an ongoing 

right that may be asserted at any time by the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant 

Trust, as applicable. 

C. Dissolution of the Committee 

On the Effective Date, the Committee will dissolve, and the members of the Committee 

and the Committee’s Professionals will cease to have any role arising from or relating to the 

Chapter 11 Case, except in connection with final fee applications of Professionals for services 

rendered prior to the Effective Date (including the right to object thereto). The Professionals 

retained by the Committee and the members thereof will not be entitled to assert any fee claims 

for any services rendered to the Committee or expenses incurred in the service of the Committee 

after the Effective Date, except for reasonable fees for services rendered, and actual and necessary 

costs incurred, in connection with any applications for allowance of Professional Fees pending on 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 143 of

161

Appx. 0163

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 144 of 162 PageID 217

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 144 of 162

000248

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 217 of 235 PageID 310
47 

the Effective Date or filed and served after the Effective Date pursuant to the Plan. Nothing in the 

Plan shall prohibit or limit the ability of the Debtor’s or Committee’s Professionals to represent 

either of the Trustees or to be compensated or reimbursed per the Plan and the Claimant Trust 

Agreement in connection with such representation. 

ARTICLE IX.

EXCULPATION, INJUNCTION AND RELATED PROVISIONS 

A. General 

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Plan to the contrary, the allowance, 

classification and treatment of all Allowed Claims and Equity Interests and their respective 

distributions and treatments under the Plan shall take into account the relative priority and rights 

of the Claims and the Equity Interests in each Class in connection with any contractual, legal and 

equitable subordination rights relating thereto whether arising under general principles of equitable 

subordination, section 510 of the Bankruptcy Code, or otherwise. 

B. Discharge of Claims 

To the fullest extent provided under section 1141(d)(1)(A) and other applicable provisions 

of the Bankruptcy Code, except as otherwise expressly provided by this Plan or the Confirmation 

Order, all consideration distributed under this Plan will be in exchange for, and in complete 

satisfaction, settlement, discharge, and release of, all Claims and Equity Interests of any kind or 

nature whatsoever against the Debtor or any of its Assets or properties, and regardless of whether 

any property will have been distributed or retained pursuant to this Plan on account of such Claims 

or Equity Interests. Except as otherwise expressly provided by this Plan or the Confirmation 

Order, upon the Effective Date, the Debtor and its Estate will be deemed discharged and released 

under and to the fullest extent provided under section 1141(d)(1)(A) and other applicable 

provisions of the Bankruptcy Code from any and all Claims and Equity Interests of any kind or 

nature whatsoever, including, but not limited to, demands and liabilities that arose before the 

Confirmation Date, and all debts of the kind specified in section 502(g), 502(h), or 502(i) of the 

Bankruptcy Code. 

C. Exculpation 

Subject in all respects to ARTICLE XII.D of this Plan, to the maximum extent permitted 

by applicable law, no Exculpated Party will have or incur, and each Exculpated Party is hereby 

exculpated from, any claim, obligation, suit, judgment, damage, demand, debt, right, Cause of 

Action, remedy, loss, and liability for conduct occurring on or after the Petition Date in connection 

with or arising out of (i) the filing and administration of the Chapter 11 Case; (ii) the negotiation 

and pursuit of the Disclosure Statement, the Plan, or the solicitation of votes for, or confirmation 

of, the Plan; (iii) the funding or consummation of the Plan (including the Plan Supplement) or any 

related agreements, instruments, or other documents, the solicitation of votes on the Plan, the offer, 

issuance, and Plan Distribution of any securities issued or to be issued pursuant to the Plan, 

including the Claimant Trust Interests, whether or not such Plan Distributions occur following the 

Effective Date; (iv) the implementation of the Plan; and (v) any negotiations, transactions, and 

documentation in connection with the foregoing clauses (i)-(iv); provided, however, the foregoing 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 144 of

161

Appx. 0164

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 145 of 162 PageID 218

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 145 of 162

000249

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 218 of 235 PageID 311
48 

will not apply to (a) any acts or omissions of an Exculpated Party arising out of or related to acts 

or omissions that constitute bad faith, fraud, gross negligence, criminal misconduct, or willful 

misconduct or (b) Strand or any Employee other than with respect to actions taken by such Entities 

from the date of appointment of the Independent Directors through the Effective Date. This 

exculpation shall be in addition to, and not in limitation of, all other releases, indemnities, 

exculpations, any other applicable law or rules, or any other provisions of this Plan, including 

ARTICLE IV.C.2, protecting such Exculpated Parties from liability. 

D. Releases by the Debtor 

On and after the Effective Date, each Released Party is deemed to be, hereby conclusively, 

absolutely, unconditionally, irrevocably, and forever released and discharged by the Debtor and 

the Estate, in each case on behalf of themselves and their respective successors, assigns, and 

representatives, including, but not limited to, the Claimant Trust and the Litigation Sub-Trust from 

any and all Causes of Action, including any derivative claims, asserted on behalf of the Debtor, 

whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, existing or hereafter 

arising, in law, equity, contract, tort or otherwise, that the Debtor or the Estate would have been 

legally entitled to assert in their own right (whether individually or collectively) or on behalf of 

the holder of any Claim against, or Interest in, a Debtor or other Person. 

Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the foregoing release does not 

release: (i) any obligations of any party under the Plan or any document, instrument, or agreement 

executed to implement the Plan, (ii) the rights or obligations of any current employee of the Debtor 

under any employment agreement or plan, (iii) the rights of the Debtor with respect to any 

confidentiality provisions or covenants restricting competition in favor of the Debtor under any 

employment agreement with a current or former employee of the Debtor, (iv) any Avoidance 

Actions, or (v) any Causes of Action arising from willful misconduct, criminal misconduct, actual 

fraud, or gross negligence of such applicable Released Party as determined by Final Order of the 

Bankruptcy Court or any other court of competent jurisdiction. 

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any release provided pursuant to this 

ARTICLE IX.D (i) with respect to a Senior Employee, is conditioned in all respects on (a) such 

Senior Employee executing a Senior Employee Stipulation on or prior to the Effective Date and 

(b) the reduction of such Senior Employee’s Allowed Claim as set forth in the Senior Employee 

Stipulation (such amount, the “Reduced Employee Claim”), and (ii) with respect to any Employee, 

including a Senior Employee, shall be deemed null and void and of no force and effect (1) if there 

is more than one member of the Claimant Trust Oversight Committee who does not represent 

entities holding a Disputed or Allowed Claim (the “Independent Members”), the Claimant Trustee 

and the Independent Members by majority vote determine or (2) if there is only one Independent 

Member, the Independent Member after discussion with the Claimant Trustee, determines (in each 

case after discussing with the full Claimant Trust Oversight Committee) that such Employee 

(regardless of whether the Employee is then currently employed by the Debtor, the Reorganized 

Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee): 

x sues, attempts to sue, or threatens or works with or assists any entity or person to sue, 

attempt to sue, or threaten the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trust, the Litigation 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 145 of

161

Appx. 0165

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 146 of 162 PageID 219

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 146 of 162

000250

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 219 of 235 PageID 312
49 

Sub-Trust, or any of their respective employees or agents, or any Released Party on or 

in connection with any claim or cause of action arising prior to the Effective Date, 

x has taken any action that, impairs or harms the value of the Claimant Trust Assets or 

the Reorganized Debtor Assets, or 

x (x) upon the request of the Claimant Trustee, has failed to provide reasonable assistance 

in good faith to the Claimant Trustee or the Reorganized Debtor with respect to (1) the 

monetization of the Claimant Trust Assets or Reorganized Debtor Assets, as applicable, 

or (2) the resolution of Claims, or (y) has taken any action that impedes or frustrates 

the Claimant Trustee or the Reorganized Debtor with respect to any of the foregoing. 

Provided, however, that the release provided pursuant to this ARTICLE IX.D will vest and the 

Employee will be indefeasibly released pursuant to this ARTICLE IX.D if such Employee’s 

release has not been deemed null and void and of no force and effect on or prior to the date that is 

the date of dissolution of the Claimant Trust pursuant to the Claimant Trust Agreement. 

By executing the Senior Employee Stipulation embodying this release, each Senior 

Employee acknowledges and agrees, without limitation, to the terms of this release and the tolling 

agreement contained in the Senior Employee Stipulation. 

The provisions of this release and the execution of a Senior Employee Stipulation will not 

in any way prevent or limit any Employee from (i) prosecuting its Claims, if any, against the 

Debtor’s Estate, (ii) defending him or herself against any claims or causes of action brought against 

the Employee by a third party, or (iii) assisting other persons in defending themselves from any 

Estate Claims brought by the Litigation Trustee (but only with respect to Estate Claims brought 

by the Litigation Trustee and not collection or other actions brought by the Claimant Trustee). 

E. Preservation of Rights of Action 

1. Maintenance of Causes of Action 

Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtor 

or the Claimant Trust will retain all rights to commence, pursue, litigate or settle, as appropriate, 

any and all Causes of Action included in the Reorganized Debtor Assets or Claimant Trust Assets, 

as applicable, whether existing as of the Petition Date or thereafter arising, in any court or other 

tribunal including, without limitation, in an adversary proceeding Filed in the Chapter 11 Case 

and, as the successors in interest to the Debtor and the Estate, may, and will have the exclusive 

right to, enforce, sue on, settle, compromise, transfer or assign (or decline to do any of the 

foregoing) any or all of the Causes of Action without notice to or approval from the Bankruptcy 

Court. 

2. Preservation of All Causes of Action Not Expressly Settled or Released 

Unless a Cause of Action against a Holder of a Claim or an Equity Interest or other Entity 

is expressly waived, relinquished, released, compromised or settled in this Plan or any Final Order 

(including, without limitation, the Confirmation Order), such Cause of Action is expressly reserved 

for later adjudication by the Reorganized Debtor or Claimant Trust, as applicable (including, 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 146 of

161

Appx. 0166

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 147 of 162 PageID 220

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 147 of 162

000251

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 220 of 235 PageID 313
50 

without limitation, Causes of Action not specifically identified or of which the Debtor may 

presently be unaware or that may arise or exist by reason of additional facts or circumstances 

unknown to the Debtor at this time or facts or circumstances that may change or be different from 

those the Debtor now believes to exist) and, therefore, no preclusion doctrine, including, without 

limitation, the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim preclusion, 

waiver, estoppel (judicial, equitable or otherwise) or laches will apply to such Causes of Action as 

a consequence of the confirmation, effectiveness, or consummation of this Plan based on the 

Disclosure Statement, this Plan or the Confirmation Order, except where such Causes of Action 

have been expressly released in this Plan or any other Final Order (including, without limitation, 

the Confirmation Order). In addition, the right of the Reorganized Debtor or the Claimant Trust 

to pursue or adopt any claims alleged in any lawsuit in which the Debtor is a plaintiff, defendant 

or an interested party, against any Entity, including, without limitation, the plaintiffs or codefendants in such lawsuits, is expressly reserved. 

F. Injunction 

Upon entry of the Confirmation Order, all Enjoined Parties are and shall be 

permanently enjoined, on and after the Effective Date, from taking any actions to interfere 

with the implementation or consummation of the Plan. 

Except as expressly provided in the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or a separate order 

of the Bankruptcy Court, all Enjoined Parties are and shall be permanently enjoined, on and 

after the Effective Date, with respect to any Claims and Equity Interests, from directly or 

indirectly (i) commencing, conducting, or continuing in any manner any suit, action, or other 

proceeding of any kind (including any proceeding in a judicial, arbitral, administrative or 

other forum) against or affecting the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (ii) enforcing, 

levying, attaching (including any prejudgment attachment), collecting, or otherwise 

recovering, enforcing, or attempting to recover or enforce, by any manner or means, any 

judgment, award, decree, or order against the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (iii) 

creating, perfecting, or otherwise enforcing in any manner, any security interest, lien or 

encumbrance of any kind against the Debtor or the property of the Debtor, (iv) asserting any 

right of setoff, directly or indirectly, against any obligation due to the Debtor or against 

property or interests in property of the Debtor, except to the limited extent permitted under 

Sections 553 and 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code, and (v) acting or proceeding in any manner, 

in any place whatsoever, that does not conform to or comply with the provisions of the Plan. 

The injunctions set forth herein shall extend to, and apply to any act of the type set 

forth in any of clauses (i)-(v) of the immediately preceding paragraph against any successors 

of the Debtor, including, but not limited to, the Reorganized Debtor, the Litigation SubTrust, and the Claimant Trust and their respective property and interests in property. 

Subject in all respects to ARTICLE XII.D, no Enjoined Party may commence or 

pursue a claim or cause of action of any kind against any Protected Party that arose or arises 

from or is related to the Chapter 11 Case, the negotiation of the Plan, the administration of 

the Plan or property to be distributed under the Plan, the wind down of the business of the 

Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, the administration of the Claimant Trust or the Litigation 

Sub-Trust, or the transactions in furtherance of the foregoing without the Bankruptcy Court 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 147 of

161

Appx. 0167

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 148 of 162 PageID 221

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 148 of 162

000252

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 221 of 235 PageID 314
51 

(i) first determining, after notice and a hearing, that such claim or cause of action represents 

a colorable claim of any kind, including, but not limited to, negligence, bad faith, criminal 

misconduct, willful misconduct, fraud, or gross negligence against a Protected Party and (ii) 

specifically authorizing such Enjoined Party to bring such claim or cause of action against 

any such Protected Party; provided, however, the foregoing will not apply to a claim or cause 

of action against Strand or against any Employee other than with respect to actions taken, 

respectively, by Strand or by such Employee from the date of appointment of the 

Independent Directors through the Effective Date. The Bankruptcy Court will have sole and 

exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether a claim or cause of action is colorable and, only 

to the extent legally permissible and as provided for in ARTICLE XI, shall have jurisdiction 

to adjudicate the underlying colorable claim or cause of action. 

G. Duration of Injunctions and Stays 

ARTICLE II. Unless otherwise provided in this Plan, in the Confirmation Order, or 

in a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court, (i) all injunctions and stays entered during the 

Chapter 11 Case and in existence on the Confirmation Date shall remain in full force and 

effect in accordance with their terms; and (ii) the automatic stay arising under section 362 

of the Bankruptcy Code shall remain in full force and effect subject to Section 362(c) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, and to the extent necessary if the Debtor does not receive a discharge, the 

Court will enter an equivalent order under Section 105. 

H. Continuance of January 9 Order 

Unless otherwise provided in this Plan, in the Confirmation Order, or in a Final Order of 

the Bankruptcy Court, the restrictions set forth in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Order Approving 

Settlement with Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Regarding Governance of the Debtor 

and Procedures for Operations in the Ordinary Course, entered by the Bankruptcy Court on 

January 9, 2020 [D.I. 339] shall remain in full force and effect following the Effective Date. 

ARTICLE X.

BINDING NATURE OF PLAN 

On the Effective Date, and effective as of the Effective Date, the Plan, including, without 

limitation, the provisions in ARTICLE IX, will bind, and will be deemed binding upon, all Holders 

of Claims against and Equity Interests in the Debtor and such Holder’s respective successors and 

assigns, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, notwithstanding whether or not such 

Holder will receive or retain any property or interest in property under the Plan. All Claims and 

Debts shall be fixed and adjusted pursuant to this Plan. The Plan shall also bind any taxing 

authority, recorder of deeds, or similar official for any county, state, Governmental Unit or parish 

in which any instrument related to the Plan or related to any transaction contemplated thereby is 

to be recorded with respect to nay taxes of the kind specified in Bankruptcy Code section 1146(a). 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 148 of

161

Appx. 0168

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 149 of 162 PageID 222

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 149 of 162

000253

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 222 of 235 PageID 315
52 

ARTICLE XI.

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 

Pursuant to sections 105 and 1142 of the Bankruptcy Code and notwithstanding the entry 

of the Confirmation Order and the occurrence of the Effective Date, the Bankruptcy Court shall, 

after the Effective Date, retain such jurisdiction over the Chapter 11 Case and all Entities with 

respect to all matters related to the Chapter 11 Case, the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trust, 

and this Plan to the maximum extent legally permissible, including, without limitation, jurisdiction 

to: 

x allow, disallow, determine, liquidate, classify, estimate or establish the priority, 

secured, unsecured, or subordinated status of any Claim or Equity Interest, including, 

without limitation, the resolution of any request for payment of any Administrative 

Expense Claim and the resolution of any and all objections to the allowance or priority 

of any Claim or Equity Interest; 

x grant or deny any applications for allowance of compensation or reimbursement of 

expenses authorized pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code or this Plan, for periods ending 

on or before the Effective Date; provided, however, that, from and after the Effective 

Date, the Reorganized Debtor shall pay Professionals in the ordinary course of business 

for any work performed after the Effective Date subject to the terms of this Plan and 

the Confirmation Order, and such payment shall not be subject to the approval of the 

Bankruptcy Court; 

x resolve any matters related to the assumption, assignment or rejection of any Executory 

Contract or Unexpired Lease to which the Debtor is party or with respect to which the 

Debtor, Reorganized Debtor, or Claimant Trust may be liable and to adjudicate and, if 

necessary, liquidate, any Claims arising therefrom, including, without limitation, any 

dispute regarding whether a contract or lease is or was executory or expired; 

x make any determination with respect to a claim or cause of action against a Protected 

Party as set forth in ARTICLE IX; 

x resolve any claim or cause of action against an Exculpated Party or Protected Party 

arising from or related to the Chapter 11 Case, the negotiation of this Plan, the 

administration of the Plan or property to be distributed under the Plan, the wind down 

of the business of the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, or the transactions in furtherance 

of the foregoing; 

x if requested by the Reorganized Debtor or the Claimant Trustee, authorize, approve, 

and allow any sale, disposition, assignment or other transfer of the Reorganized Debtor 

Assets or Claimant Trust Assets, including any break-up compensation or expense 

reimbursement that may be requested by a purchaser thereof; provided, however, that 

neither the Reorganized Debtor nor the Claimant Trustee shall be required to seek such 

authority or approval from the Bankruptcy Court unless otherwise specifically required 

by this Plan or the Confirmation Order; 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 149 of

161

Appx. 0169

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 150 of 162 PageID 223

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 150 of 162

000254

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 223 of 235 PageID 316
53 

x if requested by the Reorganized Debtor or the Claimant Trustee, authorize, approve, 

and allow any borrowing or the incurrence of indebtedness, whether secured or 

unsecured by the Reorganized Debtor or Claimant Trust; provided, however, that 

neither the Reorganized Debtor nor the Claimant Trustee shall be required to seek such 

authority or approval from the Bankruptcy Court unless otherwise specifically required 

by this Plan or the Confirmation Order; 

x resolve any issues related to any matters adjudicated in the Chapter 11 Case; 

x ensure that distributions to Holders of Allowed Claims and Allowed Equity Interests 

are accomplished pursuant to the provisions of this Plan; 

x decide or resolve any motions, adversary proceedings, contested or litigated matters 

and any other Causes of Action (including Estate Claims) that are pending as of the 

Effective Date or that may be commenced in the future, including approval of any 

settlements, compromises, or other resolutions as may be requested by the Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trustee, or the Litigation Trustee whether under 

Bankruptcy Rule 9019 or otherwise, and grant or deny any applications involving the 

Debtor that may be pending on the Effective Date or instituted by the Reorganized 

Debtor, the Claimant Trustee, or Litigation Trustee after the Effective Date, provided 

that the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trustee, and the Litigation Trustee shall 

reserve the right to commence actions in all appropriate forums and jurisdictions; 

x enter such orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement, effectuate, or 

consummate the provisions of this Plan, the Plan Documents, and all other contracts, 

instruments, releases, and other agreements or documents adopted in connection with 

this Plan, the Plan Documents, or the Disclosure Statement; 

x resolve any cases, controversies, suits or disputes that may arise in connection with the 

implementation, effectiveness, consummation, interpretation, or enforcement of this 

Plan or any Entity’s obligations incurred in connection with this Plan; 

x issue injunctions and enforce them, enter and implement other orders or take such other 

actions as may be necessary or appropriate to restrain interference by any Entity with 

implementation, effectiveness, consummation, or enforcement of this Plan, except as 

otherwise provided in this Plan; 

x enforce the terms and conditions of this Plan and the Confirmation Order; 

x resolve any cases, controversies, suits or disputes with respect to the release, 

exculpation, indemnification, and other provisions contained herein and enter such 

orders or take such others actions as may be necessary or appropriate to implement or 

enforce all such releases, injunctions and other provisions; 

x enter and implement such orders or take such others actions as may be necessary or 

appropriate if the Confirmation Order is modified, stayed, reversed, revoked or 

vacated; 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 150 of

161

Appx. 0170

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 151 of 162 PageID 224

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 151 of 162

000255

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 224 of 235 PageID 317
54 

x resolve any other matters that may arise in connection with or relate to this Plan, the 

Disclosure Statement, the Confirmation Order, the Plan Documents, or any contract, 

instrument, release, indenture or other agreement or document adopted in connection 

with this Plan or the Disclosure Statement; and 

x enter an order concluding or closing the Chapter 11 Case after the Effective Date. 

ARTICLE XII.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 

A. Payment of Statutory Fees and Filing of Reports 

All outstanding Statutory Fees shall be paid on the Effective Date. All such fees payable, 

and all such fees that become due and payable, after the Effective Date shall be paid by the 

Reorganized Debtor when due or as soon thereafter as practicable until the Chapter 11 Case is 

closed, converted, or dismissed. The Claimant Trustee shall File all quarterly reports due prior to 

the Effective Date when they become due, in a form reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Trustee. 

After the Effective Date, the Claimant Trustee shall File with the Bankruptcy Court quarterly 

reports when they become due, in a form reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Trustee. The 

Reorganized Debtor shall remain obligated to pay Statutory Fees to the Office of the U.S. Trustee 

until the earliest of the Debtor’s case being closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 

7 of the Bankruptcy Code. 

B. Modification of Plan 

Effective as of the date hereof and subject to the limitations and rights contained in this 

Plan: (a) the Debtor reserves the right, in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the 

Bankruptcy Rules, to amend or modify this Plan prior to the entry of the Confirmation Order with 

the consent of the Committee, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld; and (b) after the entry 

of the Confirmation Order, the Debtor may, after notice and hearing and entry of an order of the 

Bankruptcy Court, amend or modify this Plan, in accordance with section 1127(b) of the 

Bankruptcy Code or remedy any defect or omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan in 

such manner as may be necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this Plan. 

C. Revocation of Plan 

The Debtor reserves the right to revoke or withdraw this Plan prior to the Confirmation 

Date and to File a subsequent chapter 11 plan with the consent of the Committee. If the Debtor 

revokes or withdraws this Plan prior to the Confirmation Date, then: (i) this Plan shall be null and 

void in all respects; (ii) any settlement or compromise embodied in this Plan, assumption of 

Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases effected by this Plan and any document or agreement 

executed pursuant hereto shall be deemed null and void except as may be set forth in a separate 

order entered by the Bankruptcy Court; and (iii) nothing contained in this Plan shall: (a) constitute 

a waiver or release of any Claims by or against, or any Equity Interests in, the Debtor or any other 

Entity; (b) prejudice in any manner the rights of the Debtor or any other Entity; or (c) constitute 

an admission, acknowledgement, offer or undertaking of any sort by the Debtor or any other Entity. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 151 of

161

Appx. 0171

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 152 of 162 PageID 225

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 152 of 162

000256

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 225 of 235 PageID 318
55 

D. Obligations Not Changed 

Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, nothing herein will affect or 

otherwise limit or release any non-Debtor Entity’s (including any Exculpated Party’s) duties or 

obligations, including any contractual and indemnification obligations, to the Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor, or any other Entity whether arising under contract, statute, or otherwise. 

E. Entire Agreement

Except as otherwise described herein, this Plan supersedes all previous and 

contemporaneous negotiations, promises, covenants, agreements, understandings, and 

representations on such subjects, all of which have become merged and integrated into this Plan. 

F. Closing of Chapter 11 Case

The Claimant Trustee shall, after the Effective Date and promptly after the full 

administration of the Chapter 11 Case, File with the Bankruptcy Court all documents required by 

Bankruptcy Rule 3022 and any applicable order of the Bankruptcy Court to close the Chapter 11 

Case. 

G. Successors and Assigns 

This Plan shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Debtor and its successors 

and assigns, including, without limitation, the Reorganized Debtor and the Claimant Trustee. The 

rights, benefits, and obligations of any Person or Entity named or referred to in this Plan shall be 

binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, any heir, executor, administrator, successor, or assign 

of such Person or Entity. 

H. Reservation of Rights 

Except as expressly set forth herein, this Plan shall have no force or effect unless and until 

the Bankruptcy Court enters the Confirmation Order and the Effective Date occurs. Neither the 

filing of this Plan, any statement or provision contained herein, nor the taking of any action by the 

Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trustee, or any other Entity with respect to this Plan 

shall be or shall be deemed to be an admission or waiver of any rights of: (1) the Debtor, the 

Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee with respect to the Holders of Claims or Equity 

Interests or other Entity; or (2) any Holder of a Claim or an Equity Interest or other Entity prior to 

the Effective Date. 

Neither the exclusion or inclusion by the Debtor of any contract or lease on any exhibit, 

schedule, or other annex to this Plan or in the Plan Documents, nor anything contained in this Plan, 

will constitute an admission by the Debtor that any such contract or lease is or is not an executory 

contract or lease or that the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, the Claimant Trustee, or their 

respective Affiliates has any liability thereunder. 

Except as explicitly provided in this Plan, nothing herein shall waive, excuse, limit, 

diminish, or otherwise alter any of the defenses, claims, Causes of Action, or other rights of the 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 152 of

161

Appx. 0172

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 153 of 162 PageID 226

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 153 of 162

000257

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 226 of 235 PageID 319
56 

Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee under any executory or non-executory 

contract. 

Nothing in this Plan will increase, augment, or add to any of the duties, obligations, 

responsibilities, or liabilities of the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee, as 

applicable, under any executory or non-executory contract or lease. 

If there is a dispute regarding whether a contract or lease is or was executory at the time of 

its assumption under this Plan, the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee, as 

applicable, shall have thirty (30) days following entry of a Final Order resolving such dispute to 

alter their treatment of such contract. 

I. Further Assurances 

The Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the Claimant Trustee, as applicable, all Holders of 

Claims and Equity Interests receiving distributions hereunder, and all other Entities shall, from 

time to time, prepare, execute and deliver any agreements or documents and take any other actions 

as may be necessary or advisable to effectuate the provisions and intent of this Plan or the 

Confirmation Order. On or before the Effective Date, the Debtor shall File with the Bankruptcy 

Court all agreements and other documents that may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate and 

further evidence the terms and conditions hereof. 

J. Severability 

If, prior to the Confirmation Date, any term or provision of this Plan is determined by the 

Bankruptcy Court to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the Bankruptcy Court will have the power 

to alter and interpret such term or provision to make it valid or enforceable to the maximum extent 

practicable, consistent with the original purpose of the term or provision held to be invalid, void, 

or unenforceable, and such term or provision will then be applicable as altered or interpreted. 

Notwithstanding any such holding, alteration or interpretation, the remainder of the terms and 

provisions of this Plan will remain in full force and effect and will in no way be affected, impaired, 

or invalidated by such holding, alteration, or interpretation. The Confirmation Order will 

constitute a judicial determination and will provide that each term and provision of this Plan, as it 

may have been altered or interpreted in accordance with the foregoing, is valid and enforceable 

pursuant to its terms. 

K. Service of Documents 

All notices, requests, and demands to or upon the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, or the 

Claimant Trustee to be effective shall be in writing and, unless otherwise expressly provided 

herein, shall be deemed to have been duly given or made when actually delivered addressed as 

follows: 

If to the Claimant Trust: 

Highland Claimant Trust 

c/o Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

300 Crescent Court, Suite 700 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 153 of

161

Appx. 0173

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 154 of 162 PageID 227

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 154 of 162

000258

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 227 of 235 PageID 320
57 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Attention: James P. Seery, Jr. 

If to the Debtor: 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

300 Crescent Court, Suite 700 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Attention: James P. Seery, Jr. 

with copies to: 

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-6910 

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 

Attn: Jeffrey N. Pomerantz, Esq. 

 Ira D. Kharasch, Esq. 

 Gregory V. Demo, Esq. 

If to the Reorganized Debtor: 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

300 Crescent Court, Suite 700 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Attention: James P. Seery, Jr. 

with copies to: 

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Attn: Jeffrey N. Pomerantz, Esq. 

 Ira D. Kharasch, Esq. 

 Gregory V. Demo, Esq. 

L. Exemption from Certain Transfer Taxes Pursuant to Section 1146(a) of the 

Bankruptcy Code 

To the extent permitted by applicable law, pursuant to section 1146(a) of the Bankruptcy 

Code, any transfers of property pursuant hereto shall not be subject to any Stamp or Similar Tax 

or governmental assessment in the United States, and the Confirmation Order shall direct the 

appropriate federal, state or local governmental officials or agents or taxing authority to forego the 

collection of any such Stamp or Similar Tax or governmental assessment and to accept for filing 

and recordation instruments or other documents pursuant to such transfers of property without the 

payment of any such Stamp or Similar Tax or governmental assessment. Such exemption 

specifically applies, without limitation, to (i) all actions, agreements and documents necessary to 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 154 of

161

Appx. 0174

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 155 of 162 PageID 228

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 155 of 162

000259

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 228 of 235 PageID 321
58 

evidence and implement the provisions of and the distributions to be made under this Plan; (ii) the 

maintenance or creation of security or any Lien as contemplated by this Plan; and (iii) assignments, 

sales, or transfers executed in connection with any transaction occurring under this Plan. 

M. Governing Law 

Except to the extent that the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules or other federal 

law is applicable, or to the extent that an exhibit or schedule to this Plan provides otherwise, the 

rights and obligations arising under this Plan shall be governed by, and construed and enforced 

in accordance with, the laws of Texas, without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of law 

of such jurisdiction; provided, however, that corporate governance matters relating to the 

Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, New GP LLC, or the Claimant Trust, as applicable, shall be 

governed by the laws of the state of organization of the Debtor, the Reorganized Debtor, New 

GP LLC, or the Claimant Trustee, as applicable. 

N. Tax Reporting and Compliance 

The Debtor is hereby authorized to request an expedited determination under 

section 505(b) of the Bankruptcy Code of the tax liability of the Debtor is for all taxable periods 

ending after the Petition Date through, and including, the Effective Date. 

O. Exhibits and Schedules 

All exhibits and schedules to this Plan, if any, including the Exhibits and the Plan 

Documents, are incorporated and are a part of this Plan as if set forth in full herein. 

P. Controlling Document

In the event of an inconsistency between this Plan and any other instrument or document 

created or executed pursuant to this Plan, or between this Plan and the Disclosure Statement, this 

Plan shall control. The provisions of this Plan, the Disclosure Statement, and any Plan Document, 

on the one hand, and of the Confirmation Order, on the other hand, shall be construed in a manner 

consistent with each other so as to effectuate the purposes of each; provided, however, that if there 

is determined to be any inconsistency between any provision of this Plan, the Disclosure 

Statement, and any Plan Document, on the one hand, and any provision of the Confirmation Order, 

on the other hand, that cannot be so reconciled, then, solely to the extent of such inconsistency, 

the provisions of the Confirmation Order shall govern, and any such provisions of the 

Confirmation Order shall be deemed a modification of this Plan, the Disclosure Statement, and the 

Plan Documents, as applicable. 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank]

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 155 of

161

Appx. 0175

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 156 of 162 PageID 229

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 156 of 162

000260

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 229 of 235 PageID 322
DOCS_NY:40509.39 36027/002

Dated: January 22, 2021

Respectfully submitted,

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. 

By:

James P. Seery, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Restructuring

Officer

Prepared by: 

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (CA Bar No.143717)

Ira D. Kharasch (CA Bar No. 109084)

Gregory V. Demo (NY Bar No. 5371992)

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 13th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (310) 277-6910

Facsimile: (310) 201-0760

Email: jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com

ikharasch@pszjlaw.com

gdemo@pszjlaw.com

and 

HAYWARD & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Melissa S. Hayward (TX Bar No. 24044908)

Zachery Z. Annable (TX Bar No. 24053075)

10501 N. Central Expy, Ste. 106

Dallas, TX 75231

Telephone: (972) 755-7100

Facsimile: (972) 755-7110

Email: MHayward@HaywardFirm.com

ZAnnable@HaywardFirm.com

Counsel for the Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 156 of

161

Appx. 0176

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 157 of 162 PageID 230

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 157 of 162

000261

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 230 of 235 PageID 323
Exhibit B 

Schedule of CLO Management Agreements and Related Contracts to Be Assumed 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 157 of

161

Appx. 0177

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 158 of 162 PageID 231

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 158 of 162

000262

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 231 of 235 PageID 324
DOCS_NY:42355.1 36027/002

Schedule of CLO Management Agreements and Related Contracts to Be Assumed 

1. Servicing Agreement, dated December 20, 2007, by and among Greenbriar CLO, Ltd., 

and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

2. Investment Management Agreement, dated November 1, 2007, by and between Longhorn 

Credit Funding, LLC, and Highland Capital Management, L.P. (as amended) 

3. Reference Portfolio Management Agreement, dated August 1, 2016, by and between 

Highland Capital Management, L.P., and Valhalla CLO, Ltd. 

4. Collateral Servicing Agreement, dated December 20, 2006, by and among Highland Park 

CDO I, Ltd., and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

5. Portfolio Management Agreement, dated March 15, 2005, by and among Southfork CLO 

Ltd., and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

6. Amended and Restated Portfolio Management Agreement, dated November 30, 2005, by 

and among Jaspar CLO Ltd., and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

7. Servicing Agreement, dated May 31, 2007, by and among Westchester CLO, Ltd., and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

8. Servicing Agreement, dated May 10, 2006, by and among Rockwall CDO Ltd. and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. (as amended) 

9. Portfolio Management Agreement, dated December 8, 2005, by and between Liberty 

CLO, Ltd., and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

10. Servicing Agreement, dated March 27, 2008, by and among Aberdeen Loan Funding, 

Ltd., and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

11. Servicing Agreement, dated May 9, 2007, by and among Rockwall CDO II Ltd. and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

12. Collateral Management Agreement, by and between, Highland Loan Funding V Ltd. and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P., dated August 1, 2001. 

13. Collateral Management Agreement, dated August 18, 1999, by and between Highland 

Legacy Limited and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

14. Servicing Agreement, dated November 30, 2006, by and among Grayson CLO Ltd., and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. (as amended) 

15. Servicing Agreement, dated October 25, 2007, by and among Stratford CLO Ltd., and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

16. Servicing Agreement, dated August 3, 2006, by and among Red River CLO Ltd., and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. (as amended) 

17. Servicing Agreement, dated December 21, 2006, by and among Brentwood CLO, Ltd., 

and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

18. Servicing Agreement, dated March 13, 2007, by and among Eastland CLO Ltd., and 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 158 of

161

Appx. 0178

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 159 of 162 PageID 232

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 159 of 162

000263

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 232 of 235 PageID 325
 2 

DOCS_NY:42355.1 36027/002

19. Portfolio Management, Agreement, dated October 13, 2005, by and among Gleneagles 

CLO, Ltd., and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

20. Members’ Agreement and Amendment, dated November 15, 2017, by and between 

Highland CLO Funding, Ltd. and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

21. Collateral Management Agreement, dated May 19, 1998, by and between Pam Capital 

Funding LP, Ranger Asset Mgt LP and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

22. Collateral Management Agreement, dated August 6, 1997, by and between Pamco 

Cayman Ltd., Ranger Asset Mgt LP and Highland Capital Management, L.P. 

23. Amendment No. 1 to Servicing Agreement, October 2, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd. et al 

24. Interim Collateral Management Agreement, June 15, 2005, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Rockwall CDO Ltd 

25. Amendment No. 1 to Servicing Agreement, October 2, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Rockwall CDO Ltd 

26. Collateral Servicing Agreement dated December 20, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Highland Park CDO I, Ltd.; The Bank of New York Trust 

Company, National Association 

27. Representations and Warranties Agreement, dated December 20, 2006, between Highland 

Capital Management, L.P. and Highland Park CDO I, Ltd. 

28. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated March 27, 2008, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Aberdeen Loan Funding, Ltd.; State Street Bank and Trust 

Company 

29. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated December 20, 2007, between Highland 

Capital Management, L.P. and Greenbriar CLO, Ltd.; State Street Bank and Trust 

Company 

30. Collateral Acquisition Agreement, dated March 13, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Eastland CLO, Ltd 

31. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated March 13, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Eastland CLO, Ltd. and Investors Bank and Trust Company 

32. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated October 13, 2005, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Gleneagles CLO, Ltd.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National 

Association 

33. Collateral Acquisition Agreement, dated November 30, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Grayson CLO, Ltd. 

34. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated November 30, 2006, between Highland 

Capital Management, L.P. and Grayson CLO, Ltd.; Investors Bank & Trust Company 

35. Collateral Acquisition Agreement, dated August 3, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Red River CLO, Ltd. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 159 of

161

Appx. 0179

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 160 of 162 PageID 233

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 160 of 162

000264

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 233 of 235 PageID 326
 3 

DOCS_NY:42355.1 36027/002

36. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated August 3, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Red River CLO, Ltd.; U.S. Bank National Association 

37. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement, dated April 19, 2006, between 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; Highland Special 

Opportunities Holding Company 

38. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 2006, between 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; MMP-5 Funding, LLC; 

IXIS Financial Products Inc. 

39. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement (Amendment No. 2), dated May 5, 

2006, between Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; MMP-5 

Funding, LLC; IXIS Financial Products Inc. 

40. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement (Amendment No. 1), dated April 12, 

2006, between Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; MMP-5 

Funding, LLC; IXIS Financial Products Inc. 

41. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement (Amendment No. 3), dated June 22, 

2006, between Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; MMP-5 

Funding, LLC; IXIS Financial Products Inc. 

42. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement (Amendment No. 4), dated July 17, 

2006, between Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; MMP-5 

Funding, LLC; IXIS Financial Products Inc. 

43. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated February 2, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; U.S. Bank National Association; IXIS 

Financial Products Inc. 

44. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated April 18, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; Highland Special Opportunities Holding 

Company; U.S. Bank National Association 

45. Master Participation Agreement, dated June 5, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Red River CLO Ltd.; Grand Central Asset Trust 

46. A&R Asset Acquisition Agreement, dated July 18, 2001, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Salomon Smith Barney Inc.; Highland Loan Funding V Ltd. 

47. A&R Master Participation Agreement, dated July 18, 2001, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Salomon Brothers Holding Company; Highland Loan Funding V 

Ltd. 

48. Collateral Acquisition Agreement, dated June 29, 2005, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Jasper CLO Ltd. 

49. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated June 29, 2005, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Jasper CLO Ltd.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association 

50. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement, dated March 24, 2005, between 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Jasper CLO Ltd; MMP-5 Funding, LLC; and 

IXIS Financial Products Inc. 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 160 of

161

Appx. 0180

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 161 of 162 PageID 234

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 161 of 162

000265

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 234 of 235 PageID 327
 4 

DOCS_NY:42355.1 36027/002

51. Master Warehousing and Participation Agreement (Amendment No. 1), dated May 16, 

2005, between Highland Capital Management, L.P. and Jasper CLO Ltd; MMP-5 

Funding, LLC; and IXIS Financial Products Inc. 

52. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated December 8, 2005, between Highland 

Capital Management, L.P. and Liberty CLO Ltd. 

53. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated May 10, 2006, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Rockwall CDO Ltd; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association 

54. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated May 9, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Rockwall CDO II, Ltd.; Investors Bank & Trust Company 

55. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated March 15, 2005, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Southfork CLO Ltd.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National 

Association 

56. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated October 25, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Stratford CLO Ltd.; State Street 

57. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated August 18, 2004, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Valhalla CLO, Ltd.; JPMorgan Chase Bank 

58. Collateral Acquisition Agreement, dated May 31, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Westchester CLO, Ltd. 

59. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated May 31, 2007, between Highland Capital 

Management, L.P. and Westchester CLO, Ltd.; Investors Bank & Trust Company 

60. Collateral Administration Agreement, dated December 21, 2006, between Highland 

Capital Management, L.P. and Brentwood CLO, Ltd.; Investors Bank & Trust Company 

Case 19-34054-sgj11 Doc 1943 Filed 02/22/21 Entered 02/22/21 16:48:16 Page 161 of

161

Appx. 0181

Case 3:21-cv-01710-N Document 10-3 Filed 10/05/21 Page 162 of 162 PageID 235

Case 22-03052-sgj Doc 10-3 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/25/22 17:52:21 Desc

Exhibit 3 Page 162 of 162

000266

Case 3:22-cv-02280-S Document 3-2 Filed 12/06/22 Page 235 of 235 PageID 328