alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SERVE D JUL Y 8 , 201 0

.'-lA ' I 

### U. S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N i - l lu ;

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C
. I N TH E MATTE RO F JOSMANBLYTHE , Responden t FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SO000 5 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2010-031 8

HEARIN GNOTIC E PLEAS ETAK ENOTIC Etha t th e hearin g i n thi s cas e wil l b e hel do n Jul y 20,2010 , beginnin g at

10:0 0 a.m. , loca l tim e at th e followin g location : Ne w Hanove r

County Court 31 6 Princes s Stree t Gran dJur y Roo m53 0 Wilmingto n N C 2840 2 Allo w tim e t o pas s throug hsecurity
.

Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachment-Servic e Lis tFA A DOCKE T NO
. CP 1 OSW000 5 (Civi l Penalty Action )

SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Alexe i Schacht , Respondent' s Counse l Nalve n & Schacht , Attorney s at La w 35 0 Fift hAvenue , Suit e 402 2 Ne w York , N Y 1011 8 TEL : 212-616-554 0 FAX : 212-616-554 3 Yoland aAyal aBemal , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Region , ASW-7E3 , YA B Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBoulevar d Fort Worth , T X 76137-000 7 TEL : 817-222-509 9 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was by U.S
. Mail
. Fo r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
#### NYSTEL v. STATE.

No. 21700.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 22, 1941.

J. L. Bird, of Walnut Springs, and E. T. Adams, of Glen Rose, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in Somervell County on a charge of threatening the life of Monroe Parker, and assessed a fine of $100.

The procedure appears to be regular. No statement of facts or bills of exception are presented, and there is nothing for this court to review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

On June 27, 1941 the judgment of conviction was affirmed. On July 11, 1941 appellant filed a motion in which he asked that the order of affirmance be set aside, and that the judgment of conviction be reversed and remanded, asserting that he had been deprived of a statement of facts without fault on his part, which motion is supported by the affidavit of his attorney. A counter affidavit has been presented to this court made by the county judge and county attorney of Somervell County, combat-ting the averments upon which appellant seeks to have us hold that he had been improperly denied a statement of facts. Facts are asserted in said counter affidavit which completely acquit the officers mentioned of the acts charged against them as resulting in the absence of a statement of facts.

Under such circumstances, the motion for rehearing is overruled.
Agenda – May 2013 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – April 25-April 26, 2013 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, April 22, 2013 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov , Sean.Savage@ny.frb.org, and Kale.Smimmo@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not 

scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

 Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 Low/High 

 April – June 2013 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 July – September 2013 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 FY 2013 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

 FY 2014 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 FY 2015 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

 FY 2013 / 

 FY 2014 / 

 FY 2015 / 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2013 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2014 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2013 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2014 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

 3-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 10-year note (May) / 

 10-year note reopening (June/July) / / - / 

 30-year bond (May) / 

 30-year bond reopening (June/July) / 

 2-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 5-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 7-year note (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 10-year TIPS reopening (May) 

 30-year TIPS reopening (June) 

 10-year TIPS (July) 

 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates 

 52-week bill size (May/June/July) / / / / - / / 

 Total change in bills outstanding 5/13-7/13 / 

 Total change in bills outstanding FY 2013 / 

 CMB issuance May ‘13 – July ‘13 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics 

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2013 and FY2014. Do you believe the current auction 

schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s expected financing needs? What adjustments, if any, would you 

recommend? 

2. Please discuss how the hedging of interest rate products, including mortgage-backed securities, may impact the 

Treasury market should the general level of interest rates rise. 

3. Foreign demand for Treasury securities has remained strong over the last year. Please comment on the primary 

sources and drivers of foreign demand for Treasuries in the year ahead.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the compelling of testimony from a defendant in a criminal

case in open court, a restriction on the use of prior convictions except

when they are an element of the crime charged, and the right of a

defendant in a criminal case to be informed of the evidence against

the defendant.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the compelling of testimony from

a defendant in a criminal case in open court, a restriction

on the use of prior convictions except when they are

an element of the crime charged, and the right of a

defendant in a criminal case to be informed of the evidence against the defendant.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all
2

HJ 72 IH

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution only if

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

3 States within seven years from the date of its submission

4 by the Congress:

5 ‘‘ARTICLE—

6 ‘‘SECTION 1. The fifth article of amendment to the

7 Constitution of the United States is amended by inserting

8 immediately after ‘nor shall be compelled in any criminal

9 case to be a witness against himself’ the following: ‘except

10 in open court; nor be confronted with prior criminal con11 victions except where they are an element of the crime

12 charged’.

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. The sixth article of amendment to the

14 Constitution of the United States is amended by striking

15 out ‘and to be informed of the nature and cause of the

16 accusation’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘and to be in17 formed of the nature, cause, and evidence of the accusa18 tion’.’’.

Æ
#### ROBINSON v. STATE.

No. 21927.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1942.

No attorney for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Aggravated assault is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $50. The record before us contains no notice of appeal. This court is, therefore, without jurisdiction to entertain the purported appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISSOLVE TRO PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JANE DOES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 §

and PARENT DOES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 §

§

V § NO. 3:22-CV-01782-M

§

KAPPA ALPHA THETA §

FRATERNITY, INC. and BETA SIGMA §

CHAPTER of KAPPA ALPHA THETA §

FRATERNITY, INC., and BETA §

SIGMA FACILITY CORPORATION §

OF KAPPA ALPHA THETA §

FRATERNITY, INC. §

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISSOLVE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

After considering the Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order of Beta Sigma 

Facility Corporation of Kappa Alpha Theta (“Defendant”), and the response, and after a hearing 

the court:

GRANTS the Motion and dissolves the Temporary Restraining Order entered by the 

County Court at Law No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas, Cause No. CC-22-03989-A, on 31st of July, 

2022, and extended by Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 

Dallas Division on August 17, 2022.

SIGNED on August _______, 2022.

__________________________

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01782-M Document 14-8 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 600
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 299

Designating May 1, 1994, as ‘‘National Youth Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 21, 1993

Mr. HILLIARD introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating May 1, 1994, as ‘‘National Youth Day’’.

Whereas the youth of this Nation are one of the Nation’s

most valuable assets;

Whereas the youth represent the future integrity, hope, and

survival of the Nation;

Whereas the present condition of the youth in the United

States is both fragile and unstable;

Whereas the relationship between the youth and their parents

is in the weakest condition in United States history;

Whereas today there are more youth being incarcerated and

being murdered in the Nation than ever before;
2

•HJ 299 IH

Whereas there is a desperate need to address the types of

problems faced by our youth, such as violence, substance

abuse, aids and other sexually transmitted diseases, lack

of education, and unplanned pregnancies;

Whereas the people of the Nation should emphasize to the

youth the importance of family life, education, and spiritual qualities;

Whereas encouragement should be given to families to set

aside a special time for all family members to spend quality moments together;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the youth

of the Nation will provide an opportunity to emphasize to

the youth the importance of developing an ability to make

the choices necessary to avoid the types of problems faced

by many youth;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the youth

of the Nation will emphasize the importance of the role

of the youth within the family; and

Whereas the future of the youth depends on the guidance of

adults: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 1, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Youth

4 Day’’, and the President of the United States is author5 ized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon

6 the people of the United States to observe the day with

7 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 14 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 14 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 14 Filed 09/14/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 14 Filed 09/14/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 14 Filed 09/14/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 21
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 14 Filed 09/14/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 22
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 14 Filed 09/14/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 23
& Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

'Htinsportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: Notice of Communication in Docket: Date: 

DOT-OST-OST-2010-0018 

2010 U.S.-Haneda Combination Services 

Allocation Proceeding 

From: The Secretary 

To: Chief, Dockets 

FEB 2 5 2010 

.•••' 1 

"i"" ] 

C J 

23 

o 

f'2 '£z 

i 

<o 

In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following 

communication. 

On February 19,2010, during a phone conversation with Representative 

John Dingell, the Congressman expressed his support for the application of 

Delta Air Lines in the 2010 U.S.-Haneda Combination Services Allocation 

Proceeding. I responded that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I 

could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active 

consideration by the Department. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate file and in the Docket.
Case 2:22-cv-00164-Z-BR Document 18 Filed 05/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3328
|   | 1. | The Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           August 10, 2012 | /s/ Jiansong Wang     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                   | Jiansong Wang                                  |   |
|                                                                                   | Chief Finance Officer                          |   |
|                                                                                   | (Principal Financial Officer)                  |   |
# C_2014421EN.01005002.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/50

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — CU v EESC

(Case F-42/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Decision to terminate a contract))

2014/C 421/70

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CU (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented initially by: M. Arsène and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, F.-M. Hislaire and M. Troncoso Ferrer, lawyers, and subsequently by M. Pascua Mateo and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, F.-M. Hislaire and M. Troncoso Ferrer, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to terminate the applicant’s employment contract and application for compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 October 2012 and 31 January 2013 terminating CU’s temporary staff contract for an indefinite period; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 October 2012 and 31 January 2013 terminating CU’s temporary staff contract for an indefinite period;

| 2. | Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to pay CU the amount of EUR 25  000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to pay CU the amount of EUR 25  000;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 4. | Declares that the European Economic and Social Committee is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by CU. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Declares that the European Economic and Social Committee is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by CU.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.07.2013, p. 61.

1

---
Case 1:22-cr-00056-ASO-BU Document 37 Filed 02/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 69
Case 1:22-cr-00056-ASO-BU Document 37 Filed 02/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 70
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10231 Conference Calendar

JOHNNY WILLIAM IRONS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus DAN JOSLIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CV-2534

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Johnny William Irons, federal prisoner # 26283-077, appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. He challenged his conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Irons has not shown that the district court erred in construing his purported § 2241 petition as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Irons’s contentionNo. 06-10231 -2- that his claims under Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004), and United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), fall under § 2255’s savings clause is incorrect. See Padilla v. United States , 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Irons is warned that the filing of frivolous pleadings in the future will subject him to sanctions. AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
FACI International Subcommittee 

Market Access / Level Playing Field: Key Challenges for International Insurers 

Proposed Recommendation for FACI Consideration 

February 10, 2021 

• FIO should advocate for Treasury and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to pursue actions 

to ensure financial services are not exempt from commitments in trade agreements that promote 

the free flow of data consistent with consumer data privacy and protection. Such trade agreements 

should prevent unwarranted data localization, recognizing that such commitments do not restrict a 

government’s right to adopt or maintain measures to protect personal data, personal privacy and 

the confidentiality of individual records and accounts, provided that such measures are not used to 

circumvent the data flow and localization commitments. 

1
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 326 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.326

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  Designating January 16, 1995, as ``National Good Teen Day''.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed January 16, 
  1992, as ``Good Teen Day'';
Whereas both the United States Congress and the President of the United 
  States have proclaimed January 16, 1993, and January 16, 1994, as 
  ``National Good Teen Day'';
Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in the United 
  States according to the 1990 census;
Whereas our Nation's teenagers represent an important part of our 
  society, and the many physical and emotional changes and character-
  building experiences which teenagers go through are an important 
  concern;
Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who have 
  problems or those who excel;
Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their 
  intelligence, abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the good 
  which is inherent in all human beings;
Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to esteem the 
  good as well as the potential that is within each of them;
Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive qualities in 
  America's youth; and
Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now, therefore, 
  be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That January 16, 1995, is 
designated ``National Good Teen Day'', and the President is authorized 
and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the 
United States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers of the 
United States and by participating in appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`