alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TUCKER v. STATE.

No. 21713.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 26, 1941.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail fo.r a period of sixty days and a fine of $200.

The indictment, appears regular, as well as all matters of procedure. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 315

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. HOYER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, October 7, 1994, pursuant to a motion

4 made by the majority leader, or his designee, in accord5 ance with this concurrent resolution, it stand adjourned

6 until noon on Tuesday, November 29, 1994, or until noon

7 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem8 ble pursuant to section 3 of this concurrent resolution,

9 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate adjourns

10 or recesses at the close of business on any day from Fri11 day, October 7, 1994 through Friday, October 14, 1994,

12 pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader, or his
2

HRES 315 ATH

1 designee, in accordance with this concurrent resolution, it

2 stand recessed or adjourned until 9 a.m. on Wednesday,

3 November 30, 1994, or such time on that day as may be

4 specified by the majority leader or his designee in the mo5 tion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day

6 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec7 tion 3 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

8 SEC. 2. When the House adjourns on the legislative

9 day of Tuesday, November 29, 1994, pursuant to a motion

10 made by the majority leader, or his designee, in accord11 ance with this concurrent resolution, it stand adjourned

12 sine die, or until noon on the second day after Members

13 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 3 of this

14 concurrent resolution; and that when the Senate adjourns

15 at the close of business on Thursday, December 1, 1994,

16 it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second

17 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

18 section 3 of this concurrent resolution.

19 SEC. 3. The Speaker of the House and the majority

20 leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

21 the minority leader of the House and the minority leader

22 of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and

23 the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

24 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-09 -00044-CR

Llo yd A nt honyNe lso n , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF MI LAM COUNTY , 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR2189 0 , HO NORAB LE ED MAGRE , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt’ s c ourt -a

pp oin te d att or

ne y fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ingthat th e a pp e a l is frivolous and without merit. The brief mee ts the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1 9 6 7 ) , b y p r e s e n ti n g a p r o f e s s io n a l e v a lu a ti o n o f th e r e c o r d d e mo n s tr a ti n g w h y th ere are no
ar guable g rounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); H i g h v . Stat e , 57 3 S. W.2 d 8 07 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 48 5 S.W. 2d 55 3 (T e x. Cr im. App . 1 97 2) ; Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)
. Appellant rec eived a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate r ecor d and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We h a ve re vie we d th e re c or d a nd c ouns e l’ s b ri e f a

nd a g re e tha

t t he appea l is fr ivo lou s and

wi tho ut m e ri t. We fi nd no thi ng in the re c or d that mig ht argua bly su pp or t the a pp e a l.2

Se e Bl e ds oev . S

tate , 17 8 S .W .3 d 8 24 , 8 26 -2 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 05 ). Couns e l’ s mo tio n to withdraw is g rante d.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Waldrop and He nson Affir med Filed: Oc tober 28, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JIAN DONG MAI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50474

D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01220-PSG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Jian Dong Mai appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for distribution of and possession with intent to distribute

ketamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(D). Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mai’s counsel has filed a brief stating

FILED

MAR 08 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50474

there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert Davidson, certify that:

 

| 1.     | I have reviewed this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cure Pharmaceutical Holding Corp.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

  

 

| Date: May 15, 2020 | */s/ Robert Davidson*                                                       |   |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Robert Davidson

*Chief Executive Officer*

(*Principal Executive Officer*) |   |
FY 2014 President's Budget by Strategic Goal 

(Dollars in Thousands)

Direct $ Reimb. $ Direct $ Reimb. $ Direct $ Reimb. $ Direct $ Reimb. $ Direct $ Reimb. $ Direct $ Reimb. $

Management & Financial 72,931 4,235 337,574 7,601 208,896 36,752 87,325 6,919 608,807 277,208 1,315,533 332,715 

Departmental Offices Salaries and Expenses 38,008 4,235 65,744 4,914 104,987 33,752 38,008 4,235 65,028 22,366 311,775 69,502 

Department-wide Systems and Capital Investments Program 2,725 2,725 0 

Office of Inspector General 31,351 14,500 31,351 14,500 

Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration 149,538 1,000 149,538 1,000 

Special Inspector General for TARP 34,923 34,923 0 

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund 224,936 109 224,936 109 

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network 103,909 3,000 103,909 3,000 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 46,894 2,578 49,317 2,684 96,211 5,262 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service 360,165 239,342 360,165 239,342 

Tax Administration 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,861,033 110,627 0 0 12,861,033 110,627 

IRS Taxpayer Services 2,412,576 21,360 2,412,576 21,360 

IRS Enforcement 5,666,787 65,619 5,666,787 65,619 

IRS Operations Support 4,480,843 23,648 4,480,843 23,648 

Business Systems Modernization 300,827 300,827 0 

Total, Treasury Appropriations Committee 72,931 4,235 337,574 7,601 208,896 36,752 12,948,358 117,546 608,807 277,208 14,176,566 443,342 

Treasury International Programs 2,899,279 2,899,279 0 

Total, Appropriated Level 72,931 4,235 3,236,853 7,601 208,896 36,752 12,948,358 117,546 608,807 277,208 17,075,845 443,342 

Non-Appropriated Bureaus 228,064 1,151,864 0 3,599,295 0 0 0 0 0 0 228,064 4,751,159 

Office of Financial Stability (Administrative Account) 200,690 200,690 0 

Small Business Lending Fund Program 20,469 20,469 0 

State Small Business Credit Initiative 6,905 6,905 0 

Financial Services Oversight Council 19,429 0 19,429 

Office of Financial Research 88,985 0 88,985 

Bureau of Engraving and Printing 661,755 0 661,755 

United States Mint 2,937,540 0 2,937,540 

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 1,043,450 0 1,043,450 

Subtotal, Direct $ 300,995 3,236,853 208,896 12,948,358 608,807 17,303,909 

Subtotal, Reimbursable $ 1,156,099 3,606,896 36,752 117,546 277,208 5,194,501 

Total, Treasury Level 1,457,094 6,843,749 245,648 13,065,904 886,015 22,498,410 

1/ Total does not include the proposed $950 million Forfeiture Fund permanent cancellation. 

Total Treasury Goal/Objective

Repair and Reform the 

Financial System and Support 

the Recovery of the Housing 

Market

Enhance U.S. Competitiveness 

and Promote International 

Financial Stability and Balanced 

Global Growth

Protect our National Security 

through Targeted Financial 

Actions

Pursue Comprehensive Tax 

and Fiscal Reform

Manage the Government’s 

Finances in a Fiscally 

Responsible Manner
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00764

- CV

Nancy ALANIS, Appellant

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of October 1, 2006 Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC
Trust 2006

- NC3 Mortgages Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006 NC3, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, PC, and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.,

Appellee s

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar Co unty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 03042 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On October 31, 2019, appellant filed an “Amended Notice of Appeal and/or Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal and Notice of Plea to the Jurisdiction.” Because appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed, this court has jurisdiction to consider the appeal, and appellant’s motion to extend time is DENIED AS MOOT.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 6th day of December, 2019

.

__________________________________ _ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00228-CR

Bryan Leslie Hurt, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 54155, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Bryan Leslie Hurt seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated

robbery. The trial court has certified that this is a plea bargain case and has no right of appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The appeal is dismissed. See id. rule 25.2(d).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 16, 2005

Do Not Publish
Case 3:22-cv-01925-N   Document 1-2   Filed 08/31/22    Page 1 of 1   PageID 37
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 283 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 283

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and 
                          for other purposes.



                                     


103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 283

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 103-88, as amended by Public Law 103-113, is further amended by 
striking out ``October 28, 1993'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``November 10, 1993''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Case 5:22-cr-00090-H-BQ Document 25 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Larry Owens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ G. Larry Owens
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        G. Larry Owens
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 9, 2006
Case 2:22-cr-00026-Z-BR Document 77 Filed 07/26/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 194
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

Workshop on Optimal Debt Issuance 

West Gable Room 

November 14, 2012 

Registration with Coffee 1:00 – 1:30 PM 

Overview of Modeling Approach 1:30 – 2:20 PM 

 

 Moderator: Colin Kim, US Treasury (10 min) 

Respondents: Canada (10 min) 

 Netherland (10 min) 

 Sweden (10 min) 

 UK (10 min) 

Stochastic Optimization Model for Long Term Issuance 2:20 – 2:45 PM 

 

 Presenter: Allen Zhang, US Treasury 

Modeling Public Debt Strategies 2:45 – 3:10 PM 

Presenter: Michele Manna, Bank of Italy 

Coffee Break 3:10 – 3:30 AM 

Roundtable Discussion 3:30 – 5:00 PM 

 Topic 1: Cost and Choice of Horizon 

 Measurement of cost and impact of horizon: how about terminal exposure? 

 Initial condition and steady state 

 Topic 2: Pragmatic Aspects of Models 

 How are they used in practice? 

 Interaction with monetary policies 

 Respondents: Canada: Kaetlynd McRae, Simon Deeley 

 Netherland: Niek Nahuis, Steef Akerboom 

 Sweden: Thomas Olofsson 

 UK: James Knight 

 Italy: Michele Manna 

 IMF: Michael Papaioannou, Myrvin Anthony, Samar Maziad 

 FRBNY: Ken Garbade
Alcohol Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau Table 4.1 FY 2014 Treasury Congressional Justification

Major IT FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change

Investments Actual Actual Plan Request from FY 12

to FY 14 

0 0 0 0

Non-Major IT FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change

Investments Actual Actual Plan Request from FY 12

to FY 14 

1,537.71 1,380.07 1,451.50 1,350.89 -2.11%

 O&M: 015-13-1008-0 / TTB Salary and Expense 1,537.71 1,380.07 1,451.50 1,350.89 -2.11%

 O&M: 015-13-1008-0 / TTB Salary and Expense 4,801.71 2,197.27 3,059.14 2,930.07 33.35%

 O&M:

015-05-1881 / Community Development 

Financial Institutions Fund Program Account 0 1,334.33 804.32 834.16 -37.48%

 O&M: 015-13-1008-0 / TTB Salary and Expense 5,336.38 4,565.21 4,433.38 4,134.95 -9.42%

 O&M:

015-05-1881 / Community Development 

Financial Institutions Fund Program Account 0 82.52 287.39 115.26 39.68%

 O&M: 015-13-1008-0 / TTB Salary and Expense 3,359.13 2,756.60 3,179.56 3,292.72 19.45%

 O&M:

015-05-1881 / Community Development 

Financial Institutions Fund Program Account 0 255.93 143.07 77.42 -69.75%

2,865.49 2,174.95 2,232.81 2,091.04 -3.86%

 O&M: 015-13-1008-0 / TTB Salary and Expense 2,865.49 2,174.95 2,232.81 2,091.04 -3.86%

3,366.18 2,555.59 2,355.41 2,213.64 -13.38%

 O&M: 015-13-1008-0 / TTB Salary and Expense 2,866.18 2,555.59 2,355.41 2,213.64 -13.38%

 DM&E: 015-13-1008-0 / TTB Salary and Expense 500 0 0 0 0.00%

21,266.59 17,302.47 17,946.58 17,040.16 -1.52%

500 0 0 0 0.00%

20,766.59 17,302.47 17,946.58 17,040.16 -1.52%

Subtotal - IT DM&E

Subtotal - IT O&M

Total for Major and Non-Major

IT Investments 21,266.59 17,302.47 17,946.58 17,040.16

Subtotal of All Non-Major ITInvestments

3,370.14 11.87%

 Agency Funding

 External Contributions

TTB Regulatory System

TTB IT Infrastructure

Telecommunications (ITT TSS) 3,359.13 3,012.53 3,322.63

 Agency Funding

TTB Tax System

 Agency Funding

4,720.77 4,250.21 -8.55%

 Agency Funding

4,647.73

 External Contributions

TTB IT Infrastructure Mainframes

and Servers Services and Support

(ITI MSSS) 5,336.38

3,764.23 6.59%

 Agency Funding

3,531.59

 External Contributions

TTB IT Infrastructure End User

Systems and Support (ITI EUSS) 4,801.71 3,863.46

 Agency Funding

Information Technology

Funding Source 

Subtotal of All Major ITInvestments

Funding Source 

TTB General Support Services
Alcohol Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau Table 4.1 FY 2014 Treasury Congressional Justification

Major Non-IT FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change

Investments Actual Actual Plan Request from FY 12

to FY 14 

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

21,266.59 17,302.47 17,946.58 17,040.16

Funding Source 

Subtotal - Non-IT DM&E

Subtotal - Non-IT O&M

Total for Major Non-IT Investments

Total Capital Investments 

Non-IT
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby
made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer,
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE24 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section
10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.









Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank



























Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
27 August 2010

Thomas J. Gardner

Office of Science and Technology (Mail Code 4305T)

Office of Water

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Water Quality Standards Revisions now underway

HORIBA offers the following comments concerning the ongoing Water Quality Standards revision:

First, a disclaimer: We manufacture and sell laser diffraction instruments for particle sizing in water.

Our instruments are used worldwide for these types of applications

. Our Comments are:

1. Water Quality Standards should require particle size distribution information (PSD). PSD is of

fundamental importance in predicting the processes of transport of particles by flows and

against settling;

2. PSD is central to pollutant transport due to the attachment of toxic materials to particle

surfaces;

3. It is time to abandon the nephelometric standards for monitoring particulate content.

Dozens of scientific papers attest to the fundamental errors in relating nephelometric

turbidity to suspended particle concentration. Only laser diffraction technology offers

correct estimates of suspended particle size distribution and concentration, rooted in the

first principles of Mie of light scattering.

4. Laser diffraction technology has been used extensively in many industries for over 3

decades.

5. The technology is documented by ISO as standard no. ISO 13320:2009; and by the Amer.

Water Works Assoc. as standard no. 2560D.

6. PSD information can also predict the presence of specific pollutant species for purposes of

monitoring public health safety.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Michael C. Pohl

Vice President