alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 196/12 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 196 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5812 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 196

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5812 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 196/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 196/02 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  ) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 196/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

1

2015/C 196/02

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

 

UNITED STATES CODE)

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”) that:

 

(1)                        the10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                        theinformation contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2002 | /s/  James M. Hussey    |   |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                           | James M.  Hussey,            |
|                           | Chief  Executive Officer     |
|                           |                         |
| Dated:  November 14, 2002 | /s/  Lawrence A. Kenyon |   |
|                           | Lawrence A.  Kenyon,         |
|                           | Chief  Financial Officer     |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DTVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-079-02-H

ARELY JANET MENDOZA,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT A}[D RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE I,JMTED STATES MAGISTRATE TUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OX1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order'

SO ORDERED.

Dated October a 2022.

JAMES SLE RIX

UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00079-H-BQ Document 36 Filed 10/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 77
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Centeno, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.), rendered on February 22, 1988, convicting defendant, after a plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 4 Vi to 9 years for each charge, is unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the sentence *302imposed on the conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree to 3 to 9 years, and otherwise affirmed.

On July 6, 1987, the defendant and an accomplice robbed a man of his property, money and clothing. The defendant used a loaded and operable gun in the process of robbing the complainant.

The defendant pleaded guilty and was promised a sentence of *41⁄2*to 9 years. At the sentencing the Judge initially stated the defendant was being sentenced as a predicate felon. Defendant urges that he was improperly sentenced as a predicate felon. We disagree.

The prosecutor promptly informed the Judge that the basis for the 41⁄2-to-9-year sentence was not because the defendant was a predicate felon, but because the defendant had committed a class B armed felony offense. The court thereupon imposed the promised sentence of 41⁄2 to 9 years for each charge, with the sentences to run concurrently.

The sentence for the charge of robbery in the first degree, a class B felony, was correct. The sentence for the second charge of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree was erroneous. The second charge was a class C felony and should have had a minimum of 3 years as opposed to the 41⁄2 years imposed by the court. (Penal Law § 70.00 [3] [b]; § 70.02 [4].) Accordingly, we have modified the term of imprisonment imposed on that count. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey
Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and
their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



By:

/s/ Corey HenryName:

Corey HenryTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date:

March 29, 2019
Case 4:22-cv-00482-BP   Document 19-3   Filed 09/16/22    Page 1 of 2   PageID 117

Case 4:22-cv-00482-BP   Document 19-3   Filed 09/16/22    Page 2 of 2   PageID 118
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00326-L

§

DEVONSHIRE LABRANDIFF HUDSON (11) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

DEVONSHIRE LABRANDIFF HUDSON is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 

2, namely, Possession With Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting. Sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☐ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☒ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 15th day of November, 2024.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 622 Filed 11/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1974
#### SIMPSON v. STATE.

No. 21976.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1942.

J. W. McCullough, of McKinney, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for theft of chickens, punishment assessed at 25 days in the county jail.

Judgment of conviction was entered upon appellant’s plea of guilty. The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception.

Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 10-1 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 750
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000446 08-FEB-2017 07:57 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CAROLE SCHEIB,

Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 45 WM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19 th day of November , 2021, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
Case 4:22-cr-00310-O Document 1 Filed 09/20/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cr-00310-O Document 1 Filed 09/20/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cr-00310-O Document 1 Filed 09/20/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 3
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 281

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1994, and for other purposes.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 281

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1994, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 103–88 is amended by

4 striking out ‘‘October 21, 1993’’ and inserting in lieu

5 thereof ‘‘October 28, 1993’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 21,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                                                    ------------

I, Mark J. Wright, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Western Power &
     Equipment Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: March 24, 2008

/s/ Mark J. Wright
------------------------
Mark J. Wright
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         December 13-14, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard D. Crosland, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-594-0635.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 9, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-29429  Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 179 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 179

  Designating June 7, 1993, through June 14, 1993, as ``National Flag 
                          Celebration Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1993

Mr. McCloskey (for himself, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Barlow, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. 
Bilirakis, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Clement, Mr. Coleman, Ms. Danner, Mr. de la 
Garza, Mr. Frost, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Hilliard, 
   Mr. Hughes, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Kasich, Mr. Klein, Mr. 
 Kopetski, Mr. Lancaster, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
    Murphy, Mr. Neal of North Carolina, Mr. Parker, Mr. Peterson of 
 Florida, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Sharp, Mr. Spence, Mr. Volkmer, 
 and Mr. Wilson) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating June 7, 1993, through June 14, 1993, as ``National Flag 
                          Celebration Week''.

Whereas it is the obligation of each generation of Americans to instruct the 
        next in the significance of our history and of the meaning of and the 
        ideals embodied in our Nation's patriotic symbols;
Whereas the flag of the United States is the principal patriotic symbol of our 
        Nation;
Whereas the citizens of the United States already celebrate the observance of 
        Flag Day on June the fourteenth of each year; and
Whereas Public Law 89-443 did establish on June 9, 1966, that ``the President is 
        authorized and requested to issue annually a proclamation designating 
        the week in which June 14 occurs as National Flag Week, and calling upon 
        all citizens to display the flag of the United States on those days'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President revive this 
custom by declaring the week beginning June 7, 1993, which culminates 
with the observance of Flag Day, on June 14, 1993, to be ``National 
Flag Celebration Week'', during which citizens, especially children, be 
encouraged to both display the flag and study its history and the 
ideals it represents.

                                 <all>
```
A CD is included in this entry. It contains the EPA's Light - Duty Vehicl e Simulation Tool, intended for use

in estimating A/C and off - cycle credits, and an instruction. The tool is capable of performing single simulation runs only at this time. It is currently being upgraded to extend its capability to include batch simulation runs as well as additional simulation options to the users for the final rule.
Treasury’s North Lawn and 

Pennsylvania Avenue at the White 
Pennsylvania Avenue

• Major redevelopment of Pennsylvania Avenue 

from Treasury to EEOB

• Project construction starts Nov. 2003• Project construction ends Oct. 2004
Pennsylvania Avenue Plan

• Streetscape and 

landscape redesign

• New granite and 

textured paving surfaces

• Trees repositioned 

along the Avenue

• Modified security 

bollards and redesigned officer booths
Landscape Plan 1861

• The plan was designed by 

A.J. Downing in 1851

• Treasury adopted the plan 

with the completion of the South Wing

• There were formal 

landscape elements on all sides of the Treasury
Landscape Plan 1867

• Alfred Mullett, 

Supervising Architect, reworked the North lawn plan

• Fountain erected in 

North plaza

• Symmetrical 

circular patterns became the key design motif
North Lawn 1890

• Period photograph, looking east, sh

well attended lawn with a circular delement 
North Lawn 1919

The Downing plan continued after World I (at that time there was a fountain in the center of the north plaza).
Current North Lawn

• The northeast lawn has been filled in w

the completion of waterproofing projec

• The northwest lawn has plants along th

perimeter, which cannot be seem from Pennsylvania Avenue street level.
North Lawn Improvements

18

18

Individual building landscape elements remain a cohesive design feature for Washington
North Lawn Initial Replanti

• Proposed plan returns the circle as the focal design eleme• A central circular bed replaces the perimeter flower beds.• The circular beds will be a “seed” for future landscape 

enhancements for both the North and South lawns