alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 331

Designating May 1994 as ‘‘National Community Residential Care Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 1994

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating May 1994 as ‘‘National Community Residential

Care Month’’.

Whereas the need for quality, dependable health care for the

elderly, disabled, and mentally ill increases each year;

Whereas community residential care fulfills medical, social,

and nutritional assistance to those in need and who cannot care for themselves;

Whereas the community residential care industry is both national and international, and it is deserving of recognition

and appreciation;

Whereas the community residential care industry is staffed

by committed, hardworking professionals who dedicate
2

•HJ 331 IH

their working lives to the care of the elderly, the disabled,

and the mentally ill;

Whereas those providing community residential care must

meet stringent licensing requirements; and

Whereas the community residential care industry provides a

uniquely workable and homelike environment for those

unable to care for themselves at home in a manner which

promotes confidence, support, and self-esteem: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 1994 is designated as ‘‘National Community

4 Residential Care Month’’. The President is authorized and

5 requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe such month with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of amendment to Tribal-State Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Amendment to the Compact between the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and the State of Montana Regarding Class III Gaming on the Flathead Reservation, executed on October 17, 2000.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective November 24, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: November 9, 2000.

Kevin Gover,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 00-30036 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
Finamore, Robert (OST) 

From: Romanow, Josh [romanow@pillsburylaw.com' 

Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 10:16AM 

To: Finamore, Robert (OST); Park, Anna 

Subject: RE: Calima 

Bob, 

Thanks for your email. 

^P^: ^ 

'J 

Yes, we are also requesting the authority to operate other charters under Part 212 prior approval re^irerhents. 

We also intend to file the Family Support Plan this week. 

Many thanks - Josh 

From: Robert.Finamore@dot.QOv fmailtoiRobert.Finamore^dot.govl 

Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 10:09 AM 

To: Romanow, Josh; Park, Anna 

Subject: Calima 

Good Morning Josh & Anna, 

I'm working on the Calima application and just wanted to follow-up a couple of matters with you. 

I see that the request for charter authority covers the following operations: 1) behind the EU, via the EU and intermediate 

points, to the U.S. and beyond: 2) U.S.-ECAA charters; 3) 7*^ freedom cargo charters; and 4) charter transportation that 

may result from future additional rights. I assume that you'd also like for us to grant the carrier authority to perform "other 

charters subject to the prior approval requirements set forth in 14 CFR Part 212", to cover any T"" freedom passenger 

charter operations? 

Also, I see that the carrier proposes to use aircraft that would require submission of a Family Support Plan. I just wanted 

to check to ensure that you plan to file one because I'd like to be prepared to move forward once the comment period is 

completed. 

Thanks, 

Bob 

Robert J. Finamore 

U.S. Department of Transporfation 

Office of International Aviation, X-45 

Phone: (202)366-2405 

Fax:(202)366-3694
AFS-12-356-E CORRECTED COPY

In our letter dated June 11, 2012, the FAA erroneously stated the requested exemption was from § 47.65(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Re gulations (14 CFR). This document corrects the reference to § 47.69(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Exemption No. 9510A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-28247

Mr. Randolph Shields Director, Safety and Certification Hawker Beechcraft Corporation

10511 E Central Avenue Wichita, KS 67206

Dear Mr. Shields:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9510. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and limitations, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 6, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (H BC) for an extension of Exemption No. 9510. That exemption from § 47.69(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits HBC to use its Dealer’s Aircraft Registrati on Certificate to conduct flights outside the United States for flight testing, sales demonstrations, and marketing its products.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to HBC.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9510 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. HBC m ust own the aircraft;

2. The aircraft must have a temporary registration number or an assigned registration number affixed as required by 14 CFR part 45;

3. HBC shall maintain records of each internati onal flight for one year after the aircraft returns to the United States, such records to consist of:

a. Registration number and manufacturer’s serial number;

b. Dates of departure and return to the United States; and,

c. General overseas itinerary.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 9510, as amended, to July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9510, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9510.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL MARTINEZ-SANTIAGO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73358 

Agency No. A205-150-313 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Saul Martinez-Santiago, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying voluntary departure. Our jurisdiction is 

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Ali v. Holder, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73358 

637 F.3d 1025, 1028-29 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny in part and dismiss in part the 

petition for review. 

To the extent Martinez-Santiago contends the agency erred as a matter of 

law in determining that he is statutorily ineligible for voluntary departure, this 

contention fails because he was granted voluntary departure in 2011 after he was 

found to be inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A). See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(c)

(voluntary departure is not permitted if the alien was previously permitted to 

voluntarily depart after having been found inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1182(a)(6)(A)); 8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(d) (alien has the burden of proof in 

establishing eligibility for any requested benefit or privilege); see also CorroBarragan v. Holder, 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 (9th Cir. 2013) (the court’s jurisdiction 

over challenges to the denial of voluntary departure is limited to constitutional 

claims or questions of law). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Martinez-Santiago’s unexhausted 

contention that he was not advised that the previous grant of voluntary departure

would render him ineligible for voluntary departure in the future. See Tijani v. 

Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 320 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 320

 Designating April 11, 1994, as ``Persian Gulf War Veteran Recognition 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1994

Mr. Blute introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating April 11, 1994, as ``Persian Gulf War Veteran Recognition 
                                 Day''.

Whereas, on August 2, 1990, the Government of Iraq launched an unprovoked 
        assault on, and subsequently occupied the territory of, Kuwait;
Whereas Iraq's disrespect for the legitimate boundaries of a sovereign nation 
        and its demonstrated willingness to use weapons of mass destruction 
        against its neighbors posed a serious threat to world peace;
Whereas vigorous diplomatic efforts by the international community failed to 
        persuade Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait and allow the restoration of 
        Kuwait's legitimate government;
Whereas the United Nations Security Council repeatedly affirmed Kuwait's right 
        to defend itself against Iraq's armed assaults, and adopted Resolution 
        678 authorizing members of the United Nations to use all means necessary 
        after January 15, 1991, to assist Kuwait in recapturing its 
        independence;
Whereas, on January 16, 1991, a coalition of United States and allied forces 
        embarked on Operation Desert Storm, a mission to liberate Kuwait from 
        the control of Iraq;
Whereas the men and women of the United States Armed Forces risked their lives 
        to defend Kuwait and the Kuwaiti people, and successfully fought to 
        liberate Kuwait; and
Whereas, on April 11, 1991, the United Nations Security Council declared a 
        formal cease-fire ending the Persian Gulf War: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That April 11, 1994, is 
designated as ``Persian Gulf War Veteran Recognition Day'', and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
on the people of the United States to observe the day with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Yan Guo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 13, 2009
              /s/Yan GuoChief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

LINITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-064-01-H

SLEYHENDRIX

PABLO SANTILLAN-ruAREZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UNTTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GIJILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OXl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedDecemb", L ,2022.

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

JAMES

Case 1:22-cr-00064-H-BU Document 29 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
    GOLD INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
    REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
    IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
       
<S>                                                      <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                                          2,599
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               4,594,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                 6,321,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           11,607,009
<PP&E>                                                      6,123,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                              3,807,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             14,800,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       3,565,614
<BONDS>                                                       887,492
<COMMON>                                                    7,192,422
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  3,155,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               14,800,644
<SALES>                                                     6,665,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            6,665,935
<CGS>                                                       4,944,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               4,944,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,328,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             48,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               343,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  137,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           206,336
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  206,336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     .06


        

</TABLE>
Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda

November 6, 2014

1:00 – 1:10 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance Office

1:10 – 1:15 New Business 

 Certification of August 7, 2014 Meeting Minutes

1:15 – 2:05 Discussion of the Role of Cyber Insurance in Cybersecurity 

 Presentation by Adam Sedgewick on National Institute of Standards 

 and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework

 Presentation by Catherine Mulligan (Zurich N.A.) on Security & Privacy 

 Insurance Landscape

 Discussion

2:05 – 2:15 Break

2:15 – 3:00 Discussion of the Affordability of Auto Insurance 

 Presentation by J. Robert Hunter (Consumer Federation of America) 

 on the Cost of Mandatory Auto Insurance for Lower Income Households

 Discussion

3:00 – 3:50 Discussion of International Supervisory Standards for Insurers, Including Capital

 Presentation by Tom Finnell (Federal Insurance Office)

 Discussion of Workstreams of the International Association of 

 Insurance Supervisors

 Discussion of Insurance Capital Standards (ICS) and the 

 U.S. Proposal on ICS 

 Discussion of EU-U.S. Insurance Project

3:50 - 4:00 Discussion of Subcommittees 

4:00 Adjourn

Agenda

November 6, 2014

1:00 – 1:10 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance Office

1:10 – 1:15 New Business

• Certification of August 7, 2014 Meeting Minutes

1:15 – 2:05 Discussion of the Role of Cyber Insurance in Cybersecurity

• Presentation by Adam Sedgewick on National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework

• Presentation by Catherine Mulligan (Zurich N.A.) on Security & 

Privacy Insurance Landscape

• Discussion

2:05 – 2:15 Break

2:15 – 3:00 Discussion of the Affordability of Auto Insurance 

• Presentation by J. Robert Hunter (Consumer Federation of 

America) on the Cost of Mandatory Auto Insurance for Lower 

Income Households

• Discussion

3:00 – 3:50 Discussion of International Supervisory Standards for Insurers,

Including Capital

• Presentation by Tom Finnell (Federal Insurance Office)

• Discussion of Workstreams of the International Association of 

Insurance Supervisors

• Discussion of Insurance Capital Standards (ICS) and the U.S. 

Proposal on ICS 

• Discussion of EU-U.S. Insurance Project

3:50 - 4:00 Discussion of Subcommittees

4:00 Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29768]



[[Page 69938]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6904-8]


Notice of Proposed Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement 
Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative cost 
recovery settlement under section 122(h)(1) of CERCLA concerning the 
Cedar Service site located at U.S. Highway 71 and Beltrami County Road 
404, Bemidji, Beltrami County, Minnesota, which was signed by the EPA 
Director, Superfund Division, Region 5, on September 27, 2000. The 
settlement resolves an EPA claim under section 107(a) of CERCLA against 
R.G. Haley & Company, Inc., Cedar Service, Inc., Marilyn H. Antle, John 
B. ``Jack'' White and William I. Barkan. The settlement requires the 
settling parties to pay $150,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances 
Superfund.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the 
settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at the 
Superfund Records Center, located at 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Seventh 
Floor, Chicago, Illinois.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 21, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at the Superfund Records Center, located at 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Seventh Floor, Chicago, Illinois. A copy of the proposed 
settlement may be obtained from the Superfund Records Center, located 
at 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Seventh Floor, Chicago, Illinois. 
Comments should reference the Cedar Service Site, Bemidji, Minnesota, 
and EPA Docket No. V-W-00-C-614 and should be addressed to Thomas 
Krueger, Associate Regional Counsel, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, (C-
14J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Krueger, Associate Regional 
Counsel, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, (C-14J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.

    Dated: September 27, 2000.
William E. Muno,
Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 00-29768 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M