alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-1953

_____________________________

PAUL E. KNIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

John C. Cooper, Judge.

September 28, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Paul E. Knight, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### CALLEY et al. v. STATE.

No. 22116.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1942.

R. W. Webb, of Snyder, for appellants.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellants J. M. Calley and Joe Cal-ley were jointly indicted with Eugene Terrell on a charge of assault to murder Sherman Armstrong in Scurry County. Upon a joint trial of the two appellants each was assessed one year in the penitentiary, from which they appeal.

Eugene Terrell was not tried with the two appellants J. M. Calley and Joe Cal-ley and does not appear as a party in this appeal.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS2 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  February 25, 2016  /s/ Brian Smith BRIAN SMITHVice President Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such form 10QSB for quarterly period
ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                      1
       
<S>                                     <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                       20,123
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             24,256
<PP&E>                                       55,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              375,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       551,624
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                  1,685,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               (3,373,504)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                375,070
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                493
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            199,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           37,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (236,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (236,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (236,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        



</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 425 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 425

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for the convening of the First Session of the One Hundred 
                            Fourth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the first regular session 
of the One Hundred Fourth Congress shall begin at noon on Wednesday, 
January 4, 1995.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.






103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 425

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for the convening of the First Session of the One Hundred 
                            Fourth Congress.`
# CA2005172EN.01000101.xml

| 12.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 172/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 172/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,348,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,170,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,000
<INVENTORY>                                    165,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,736,000
<PP&E>                                       1,422,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 989,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,884,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          624,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,761,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,884,000
<SALES>                                      1,095,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,095,000
<CGS>                                          255,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               901,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (117,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             85,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18
(Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the small business issuer), hereby
certifies as follows:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
the small business issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small business issuer.



Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.



/s/ Mary Jo RogersMary Jo Rogers, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### In the Matter of James A. Caples, Petitioner, against William H. Clayton et al., as Commissioners of Election of Suffolk County, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County,

August 10, 1951.

*980
      *S. Martin Adelman*for petitioner.

*Fred J. Munder, County*Attorney, for respondents.

Charles S. Colden, J.

Application for an order directing William H. Clayton and Robert Hairston, as Commissioners of Elections for Suffolk County, to accept and file the petition purporting to designate this petitioner as a designee for member of the county committee of the Republican party for the 17th Election District of the Town of Babylon, Suffolk County.

According to the enrollment records for the Town of Babylon, Suffolk County, for the year 1951, at least 20 valid signatures of the enrolled members of the Republican party are required for a valid designating petition. An examination of the designating petition, dated July 17, 1951, filed on behalf of this petitioner, discloses 22 signatures. Of these 22 signatures, 2, Otto H. Warthberg and Anna Warthberg, were rejected on the ground that said signers are enrolled members of another party, a statement of fact not challenged on the argument of this application. The signatures of Mrs. Chas. Reitz and L. F. Reitz were rejected for obvious inadequacy and the signatures of Cornelius R. Trainer and Kathryn F. Trainer were rejected for incomplete date.

This court sustains the action of the Board of Elections in rejecting the signatures mentioned. The number of valid signatures remaining is 15, and inasmuch as the number required is 20 the action of the Board of Elections in rejecting the petition was correct.

Upon the argument of this application the petitioner stressed the fact that the official “ Filed ” stamp of the Board of Elections had been impressed upon the designating petition in con*981sequence whereof, it is urged that the Board of Elections is precluded from making any subsequent examination of the nominating petitions to determine their validity. The law is to ■ the contrary. It is the duty of the Board of Elections to accept petitions offered within the statutory period and it is likewise the duty of the board to thereafter determine the validity of the petitions within the statutory period. Within such statutory period the Board of Elections gave written notice of the insufficiency of the designating petition to the applicant here and ample time was afforded the applicant to examine the records of the Board of Elections had he chosen so to do.

Upon the application to Special Term the burden was upon the applicant to establish the validity of the petition in question. Upon the hearing the applicant offered no factual proof to challenge the validity of the determination of the Board of Elections and he offered no proof to sustain the validity of the designating petition. The burden was upon him to disprove the alleged irregularities and to establish the requisite number of valid signatures. The applicant wholly failed to sustain the burden of proof. Indeed, he offered no proof.. The motion of the petitioner is denied.

Submit order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,243,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             113,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          47,536,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            47,115,000
<LOANS>                                        243,210,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,854,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,665,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     276,432,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,860,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,417,000
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         4,919,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,104,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 314,665,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,743,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,328,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    85,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,156,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,469,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,627,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,529,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,865,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,196,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,196,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,270,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.48
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,680,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,483,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      269,000
<RECOVERIES>                                        40,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,854,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,854,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0



</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1119

To correct the tariff rate inversion on certain iron and steel pipe and tube

products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. QUILLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To correct the tariff rate inversion on certain iron and steel

pipe and tube products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NONALLOY IRON AND STEEL PIPES AND

4 TUBES.

5 (a) The superior article description for subheadings

6 7306.30.30 and 7306.30.50 of the Harmonized Tariff

7 Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 3007; herein8 after referred to as the ‘‘HTS’’) is amended to read as

9 follows: ‘‘Having a wall thickness of 1.65 mm or more,

10 not galvanized:’’.
2

•HR 1119 IH

1 (b) Subheadings 7306.10.10, 7306.20.60,

2 7306.30.50, and 7306.90.10 of the HTS are each amend3 ed—

4 (1) by striking out the ‘‘1.9%’’ in column 1

5 General and inserting ‘‘4.9%’’; and

6 (2) by striking out the ‘‘5.5%’’ in column 2 and

7 inserting ‘‘20%’’.

8 (c) Subheadings 7306.20.20 and 7306.60.10 of the

9 HTS are each amended—

10 (1) by striking out the ‘‘0.5%’’ in column 1

11 General and inserting ‘‘4.9%’’; and

12 (2) by striking ‘‘1%’’ in column 2 and inserting

13 ‘‘20%’’.

14 (d) Chapter 73 of the HTS is amended by inserting

15 in numerical order the following new subheading having

16 the same degree of indentation as the superior article de17 scription for subheadings 7306.30.30 and 7306.30.50:

‘‘ 7306.30.60 Having a wall thickness of 1.65mm

or more, galvanized ..................... 6.5% Free (C, E, IL)

1.3% (CA)

21.5%

’’.

18 SEC. 2. ALLOY IRON AND STEEL PIPES AND TUBES.

19 (a) Subheadings 7306.50.50 and 7306.90.50 of the

20 HTS are each amended—

21 (1) by striking out ‘‘4.9%’’ in column 1 General

22 and inserting ‘‘9.5%’’; and

23 (2) by striking out ‘‘10%’’ in column 2 and in24 serting ‘‘28%’’.
3

•HR 1119 IH

1 SEC. 3. STAINLESS STEEL PIPES AND TUBES.

2 (a) Subheading 7306.40.10 of the HTS is amended

3 by striking out ‘‘7.6%’’ in column 1 General and inserting

4 ‘‘10.1%’’.

5 (b) Subheading 7306.40.50 of the HTS is amended—

6 (1) by striking out ‘‘5%’’ in column 1 General

7 and inserting ‘‘10.1%’’; and

8 (2) by striking out ‘‘11%’’ in column 2 and in9 serting ‘‘29%’’.

10 SEC. 4. NEGOTIATING AUTHORITY.

11 In the event that a claim for compensation under any

12 provision of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

13 or any other trade agreement to which the United States

14 is a party is made by any Contracting Party to that agree15 ment as a result of the amendments made by this Act,

16 the United States Trade Representative is authorized to

17 negotiate such reasonable compensation as may be appro18 priate.

19 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

20 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

21 respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

22 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date

23 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Joint Forces Staff College

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  Coronavirus		 
-  About    -  Overview             
  -  College Leadership             
  -  College Chaplain             
  -  Contact Information             
  -  Denton Learning Center             
  -  Employment             
  -  History             
  -  Institutional Research             
  -  JFSC Faculty             
  -  Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) 
-  Academics    -  Accreditation             
  -  Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)      -  Program Description             
    -  Prerequisites             
    -  Reporting Instructions             
    -  Schedule 
  -  Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)      -  Program Description             
    -  Prerequisites             
    -  Reporting Instructions             
    -  Schedule             
    -  JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)             
    -  JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S) 
  -  Joint Information School (JIS)      -  C4I Division             
    -  Information Division 
  -  Joint Transition Course (JTC)             
  -  International Fellows      -  Incoming Fellows             
    -  Programs             
    -  Alumni             
    -  Contact Us 
  -  Senior Fellows Program 
-  Libraries		 
-  Faculty Resources		 
-  Students    -  All Course Schedules             
  -  Incoming Students             
  -  NDU Academic Policies             
  -  Security Manager/SSO             
  -  Uniform Policy 
-  Registrar		 
-  Media    -  Campaigning Journals      -  About Us             
    -  Issues & Articles             
    -  Submissions             
    -  Masthead 
  -  News             
  -  Commentary 

### Faculty Bios

### Colonel Carl E. Cooper Jr., USMCDirectorJoint Advanced Warfighting School

Colonel Cooper joined the Faculty, Joint Forces Staff College in July 2021 and was competitively selected by the Commandant as the JAWS Director in July 2022. Colonel Cooper was commissioned in May 1993, following graduation from Louisiana State University. 

Colonel Cooper's command assignments include Commanding Officer, 3d Battalion, 9th Marine Regiment and Commanding Officer, 3d Marine Regiment. His staff assignments include Future Operations Officer, Current Operations Branch, Plans, Policies, and Operations Department, Headquarters Marine Corps; Deputy Future Operations Officer, G3, II Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward); Future Operations Planner, G3, II Marine Expeditionary Force; Executive Officer, 8th Marine Regiment; Executive Officer to Commander, U.S. Africa Command; and Assistant Chief of Staff for Operations, G3 and Chief of Staff, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Pacific. 

Colonel Cooper is a graduate of Marine Corps Command and Staff College and National War College, and holds a Bachelor of Arts in History, Master of Military Studies, and Master of Science in National Security Strategy.

 

Back to JFSC Faculty

 

 

 

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
ENCLOSURE 3 : 

LIST OF WITNESSES, COMMENTS RECEIVED, 

AND VERMONT'S RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 
LIST OF WITNESSES, COMMENTS RECEIVED, 

AND VERMONT'S RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 

A public hearing was not held because no public hearing was requested. 

Therefore, there were no witnesses. In addition, no comments on Vermont's proposed 

SIP revisions were received from the public . The only comments submitted were from 

federal land managers (FLMs) and from the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA). The comments from the FLMs and the EPA, and Vermont's responses thereto, 

are provided in Appendix H to Vermont's SIP Revision for Regional Haze and in this 

enclosure.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

t1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

147272

CHANNING M. McAFEE,

Plaintiff

- A ppellee,

v SC: 147272

COA: 311501

Genesee CC: 2011

- 095183

- NP

D&G DOLLAR ZONE, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

SOFT LENS TECHNOLOGY, HEBRON

INTERNATIONAL, INC., MICHIGAN

WHOLESALE MART, L.L.C., SHEBAH, INC.,

and PRECISION OPTICAL PRODUCTS, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2013 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting

leave to appeal , we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on

leave granted.