alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 4A/5 Ja

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 4A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 655 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 4A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 655 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 4 A/01 | Vacancy Notice CONS/AD/177/22 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2022/C 4 A/01

Vacancy Notice CONS/AD/177/22

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139660 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139660 

 COA: 283456 

Kent CC: 06-004901-FH 

WALTER JAMES JENKINS, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: April 8, 2022

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, press@treasury.gov

READOUT: Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting on 

April 8, 2022

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen convened a meeting of 

the Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive session by videoconference. 

During the meeting, the Council received an update from staff of the Federal Reserve and the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission on commodity market developments and broader 

financial stability developments including asset valuations, nonfinancial and financial leverage, 

and funding risk. 

The Council also heard an update from Treasury staff on preliminary work performed in 

response to the Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets, 

including on the Council report being prepared in response to the Executive Order.

The Council also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meetings on February 4, 2022 and 

February 28, 2022. 

In attendance at the Council meeting by videoconference were the following members: 

• Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury (Chairperson of the Council)

• Jerome H. Powell, Chair, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

• Michael J. Hsu, Acting Comptroller of the Currency

• Rohit Chopra, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

• Gary Gensler, Chair, Securities and Exchange Commission

• Martin Gruenberg, Acting Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

• Rostin Behnam, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

• Sandra L. Thompson, Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency

• Todd M. Harper, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration

• Thomas Workman, Independent Member with Insurance Expertise
• James Martin, Acting Director, Office of Financial Research (non-voting member)

• Steven Seitz, Director, Federal Insurance Office (non-voting member)

• Charles G. Cooper, Commissioner, Texas Department of Banking (non-voting member)

• Beth Dwyer, Superintendent, Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation (nonvoting member)

• Melanie Lubin, Securities Commissioner, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, 

Securities Division (non-voting member)

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved meeting 

minutes is available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20044

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

JESUS LOPEZ-MOYA,

DefendantAppellant.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-382-2

---------------------------------------------------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Lopez-Moya (Lopez) moves to withdraw as

counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review ofthe record reveals a potentially nonfrivoloussentencing issue involving the use

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
-2-

of judge-found facts to enhance a sentence prior to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

Lopez completed his term of imprisonment on November 10, 2005, and was deported from

the United States. If this court were to order that Lopez be resentenced in light of Booker, Lopez

would have to appear before the district court. However, it is illegal for Lopez, as someone who has

been deported from the United States, to reenter the United States without the permission of the

Attorney General of the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Thus, even if we were to decide that

Lopez was improperly sentenced under Booker, that he may not reenter the United States for

resentencing means there is no relief we can grant him.

Asthere is no relief we can grant Lopez, his appeal is moot. United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d

845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.
Case 3:22-cr-00385-S Document 8 Filed 10/12/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 13
Case 3:22-cr-00385-S Document 8 Filed 10/12/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 14
Case 3:22-cr-00385-S Document 8 Filed 10/12/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 15
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 315

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating May 30, 1994, through June 6, 1994, as a

‘‘Time for the National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II’’.

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States of

America made tremendous sacrifices during World War

II to save the world from tyranny and aggression;

Whereas the winds of freedom and democracy sweeping the

globe today spring from the principles for which over four

hundred thousand Americans gave their lives in World

War II;
2

HJ 315 RFS

Whereas World War II and the events that led up to that war

must be understood in order that we may better understand our own times, and more fully appreciate the reasons why eternal vigilance against any form of tyranny

is so important;

Whereas the World War II era, as reflected in its family life,

industry, and entertainment, was a unique period in

American history and epitomized our Nation’s philosophy

of hard work, courage, and tenacity in the face of adversity;

Whereas, between 1991 and 1995, over nine million American veterans of World War II will be holding reunions

and conferences and otherwise commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of various events relating to World War

II; and

Whereas June 4, 1994, marks the anniversary of the Battle

of Midway, and June 6, 1994, marks the anniversary of

D-Day: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 30, 1994, through June 6, 1994, is designated

4 as a ‘‘Time for the National Observance of the Fiftieth

5 Anniversary of World War II’’, and the President is au6 thorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on

7 the people of the United States to observe that period with

8 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Elizondo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leon Becker, J., at trial and sentence), rendered June 21, 1989, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because of inconsistencies in the testimony of the two officers is without merit. There is no appreciable discrepancy between the descriptions of the parcel containing the drugs as a "black pouch” and as a "crumpled paper bag containing a black pouch.” Defendant’s own witness testified that defendant possessed a crumpled paper bag. Nor does a discrepancy as to whether the exchange of narcotics took place on the north or south side of the street raise a reasonable doubt.

Similarly unavailing is defendant’s claim that the People failed to prove his possession of the drugs was "knowing”, in light of the defense witness’s testimony that defendant was innocently on the scene waiting for a bus and had picked the parcel out of the garbage. Police officers received a radio run to investigate drug activity involving a described seller at a specified location. They observed a person fitting the broadcast *296description pass a parcel to defendant and then leave the scene quickly. When the police approached and defendant was requested to stop, he did so only after discarding the parcel and after the arresting officer made three requests and trotted after him. The defense witness’s testimony of innocent presence is discredited by testimony that the bus came and went without any attempt by defendant to board, and that after the parcel exchange, defendant began to move away from the bus stop area. Additionally, the defense witness’s testimony was peppered with inconsistencies that would tend to lead a reasonable trier of fact to believe that it was tailored to suit the defense.

We do not find the sentence imposed to be excessive. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.
Reinstated; Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

August 5, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00796-CR

LISA MICHELLE ESTRADA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________

NO. 14-12-00797-CR

EX PARTE LISA MICHELLE ESTRADA

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1296827 & 1296827-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In the appeal docketed under number 14-12-00796-CR, appellant appeals 

from the order adjudicating her guilt for theft and sentencing her to confinement 

for six months in state jail. In the appeal docketed under number 14-12-00797-CR, 

appellant appeals from the denial of her pre-trial application for writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.072. See Kniatt v. 

State, 206 S.W.3d 657, 663–64 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (reaffirming the rule that 
jurisdiction is established at the time the writ is filed and is not defeated by a 

subsequent adjudication of guilt).

A written request to withdraw the notices of appeal, personally signed by 

appellant, has been filed with this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this 

court has not delivered an opinion in these appeals, we grant appellant’s request.

Accordingly, we order the appeals dismissed. We direct the clerk of the 

court to issue the mandates of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

2
# Official Journal C 325/2 Oc

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 325 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 582 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 325

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 582 October 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 325/1 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 325/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 13 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 325/1

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 325/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-324-X

§

AURELIO O. CORTINAS, JR. (1) §

§

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, 

the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by 

the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and AURELIO O. CORTINAS, JR. (1) is hereby 

adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) – Interstate Communications with a Threat to Injure. Sentence will be 

imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

 The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if 

released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set 

the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 

3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of 

whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the 

defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the United States 

Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 8th day of March, 2023.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00324-X Document 42 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 123
# C_2016289EN.01000101.xml

| 9.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2014-2015 SESSION

Sittings of 24 to 27 November 2014

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 42, 4.2.2016
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 42, 4.2.2016

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69918-69919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada Test Site. 
The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) 
requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, December 6, 2000: 6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Great Basin Room, DOE Nevada Support Facility, 232 Energy 
Way, North Las Vegas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Rohrer, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Environmental Management, P.O. Box 98518, Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89193-8513, phone: 702-295-0197, fax: 702-295-5300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Advisory Board is to make recommendations to DOE and its regulators in 
the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.

Tentative Agenda:

1. Video entitled ``The Atomic Filmmakers,'' a look at ``Yesterday'' 
presented by the Nevada Test Site Historical Society
2. A perspective on ``Today'' by CAB members
3. Discussion of existing underground contamination
4. A glimpse at ``Tomorrow'' with priorities for future long-term 
monitoring
5. Update on groundwater issues

    Copies of the final agenda will be available at the meeting.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals

[[Page 69919]]

who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Kevin Rohrer, at the telephone number listed above. Requests 
must be received 5 days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision 
will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy 
Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Kevin Rohrer at 
the address listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC on November 15, 2000.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29733 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29030]



[[Page 68163]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-255]


Consumers Energy Company; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for 
Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Consumers Energy Company (the licensee) to withdraw its 
August 28, 2000, application for proposed amendment to Facility 
Operating License No. DPR-20 for the Palisades Plant, located in 
Covert, Michigan.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the date for implementing 
the Palisades Plant Improved Technical Specifications as established by 
Amendment No. 189, dated November 30, 1999. The implementation date 
would have been changed from ``on or before October 31, 2000,'' to ``on 
or before December 31, 2000.'' In its letter dated October 24, 2000, 
the licensee stated that Amendment No. 189 was implemented on October 
24, 2000, and that the requested delay of implementing Amendment No. 
189 was no longer needed. Therefore, the licensee requested that the 
amendment application be withdrawn.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on September 
20, 2000 (65 FR 56949). However, by letter dated October 24, 2000, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated August 28, 2000, and the licensee's 
letter dated October 24, 2000, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, 
at the NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible 
electronically through the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room link at 
the NRC Web site (http://www.nrc.gov).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of November 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Darl S. Hood,
Senior Project Manager, Section 1, Project Directorate III, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 00-29030 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P