alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000941914
<NAME>                        SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                             607
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   13,496
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                        745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                19,295
<PP&E>                          59,957
<DEPRECIATION>                  18,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  62,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           19,059
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                            50
<OTHER-SE>                      25,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    62,111
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                26,908
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   24,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  1,639
<INCOME-TAX>                       688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                       951
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .19
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 354 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 354

        Designating May 22, 1994, as ``National Neighbor Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1994

Mr. Reed introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
        Designating May 22, 1994, as ``National Neighbor Day''.

Whereas the increased incidents of crime, drugs, and violence have continued to 
        plague our cities and towns;
Whereas many people have become alienated from their neighbors; and
Whereas in light of these recent developments which have affected all of us, all 
        citizens of the United States are encouraged to signify their support 
        for peace, harmony, and friendship by introducing themselves and 
        extending a warm welcome to new people in their neighborhoods, as well 
        as renewing old friendships: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 22, 1994 is 
designated as ``National Neighbor Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997, STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS
AND YEAR TO DATE ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND 1996. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         632,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,133,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,883,680
<PP&E>                                       1,252,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                 794,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,374,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,142,866
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,326
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,374,300
<SALES>                                      2,301,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,301,168
<CGS>                                          921,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,089,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                213,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            213,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   213,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

TIMOTHY LYNCH BARTON 

CARNEGIE DEVELOPMENT, 

LLC 

WALL007, LLC 

WALL009, LLC 

WALL010, LLC 

WALL011, LLC 

WALL012, LLC 

WALL016, LLC 

WALL017, LLC 

WALL018, LLC 

WALL019, LLC 

HAOQIANG FU (a/k/a 

MICHAEL FU) 

STEPHEN T. WALL 

Defendants, 

DJD LAND PARTNERS, LLC 

LDG001, LLC 

Relief Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

No. 3:22-CV-2118-X 

 

 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 292 Filed 07/12/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 10207
2 

The parties in SEC v. Barton submit the following Joint Status 

Report in response to this Court’s July 5, 2023, Order for the “parties to 

meet and confer and, by July 12, 2023, inform the Court whether they 

agree to proceed before a mandate issues from the Fifth Circuit.” 

The interested parties met and had a productive discussion on the 

way forward. While the Commission agrees to proceed, and understands 

this Court to have jurisdiction to proceed, before the mandate of the Fifth 

Circuit issues. Defendant Barton believes that the Court lacks 

jurisdiction to entertain requests to impose a replacement receivership 

before the Fifth Circuit’s mandate is issued and that the parties probably 

cannot create that jurisdiction by agreement. As a result, Defendant 

Barton does not agree to proceed before a mandate issues from the Fifth 

Circuit. 

The parties, however, did agree to discuss a potential resolution of 

the issues underlying the receivership question. The parties will 

promptly report to the Court if any such settlement is reached. 

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 292 Filed 07/12/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 10208
3 

Dated: July 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/Keefe Bernstein 

Keefe Bernstein 

bernsteink@sec.gov 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGE COMMISSION

801 Cherry Street, Suite 1900 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

Phone: (817) 900-2607 

COUNSEL FOR UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION

By: /s/Michael J. Edney 

Michael J. Edney 

medney@huntonak.com 

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP 

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20037

Phone: (202) 955-1500

Facsimile: (202) 778-2201 

COUNSEL FOR TIMOTHY LYNCH 

BARTON 

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 292 Filed 07/12/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 10209
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not pre cedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21146

JOSE COLLEGA REYES, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-4828)

January 8, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Coll ega Reyes appeals an adverse summary judgment on his petition

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for habeas relief from his state court conviction and

sentence for murder. Having considered the record and briefs, substantially for the

reasons and authorities assigned by the district court in its Summary Judgment

Order signed December 2, 1996 and entered December 3, 1996, we AFFIRM.
Finding of 

Discrimination 

Made By

Date of Finding

Date On Which 

Each 

Discriminatory 

Act Occurred

Law Violated by 

Each Discriminatory 

Act

Date of Posting 

on Website

Agency 10/27/2022 7/15/2022 Rehabilitation Act 3/8/2023

Agency 10/31/2022 9/8/2021 Rehabilitation Act 3/8/2023

Agency 6/12/2023 03/09/2022 Rehabilitation Act 10/31/2023

Agency 09/05/2023 09/19/2022 Rehabilitation Act 10/31/2023

Agency 10/12/2023 09/01/2022

Reprisal for 

Participating in EEO 

Process

01/26/2024

Data as of 12/31/2023
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 378

Commemorating June 22, 1994, as the 50th anniversary of the Servicemen’s

Readjustment Act of 1944.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1994

Mr. MONTGOMERY (for himself and Mr. STUMP) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Commemorating June 22, 1994, as the 50th anniversary

of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944.

Whereas on June 22, 1944, President Franklin D. Roosevelt

signed into law the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of

1944, commonly known as the GI Bill of Rights of 1944;

Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 provided education

and training benefits to over 7,800,000 veterans;

Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 provided unemployment benefits and job counseling services to assist veterans during the period between discharge from military

service and re-employment;

Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 is credited with contributing to the robust recovery of the United States

post-World War II economy;
2

•HJ 378 IH

Whereas Acts enacted subsequent to the GI Bill of Rights of

1944 have provided education and training benefits to

12,500,000 veterans, making education and training opportunities for those veterans obtainable and affordable;

Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944, and subsequent Acts,

established home loan programs for veterans which, since

1944, have guaranteed over 14,300,000 loans, totaling

over $450,000,000,000, providing home ownership opportunities to millions of veterans and their families;

Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944, and subsequent Acts,

have been recognized by educational, business,

sociocultural, and political leaders as landmark pieces of

legislation which have collectively contributed to the development of the United States middle class; and

Whereas Congress has repeatedly expressed its support for

the goals of the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 through enactment of subsequent Acts: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That June 22, 1994, is hereby commemorated as the 50th

4 anniversary of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of

5 1944. The President is authorized and requested to issue

6 a proclamation calling on the people of the United States

7 to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and

8 activities.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 433/2005

of 16 March 2005         

fixing the export refunds on olive oil

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats (1), and in particular Article 3(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(2)(c) of Regulation No 136/66/EEC shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ 172, 30.9.1966, p. 3025/66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 97).

(2)OJ L 78, 31.3.1972, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2962/77 (OJ L 348, 30.12.1977, p. 53).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 16 March 2005 fixing the export refunds on olive oil

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Texas

Dallas

)

USA )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case Number: 3:22−mj−00844−BH

)

Phillip Windom Offill, Jr )

Defendant. )

ORDER APPOINTING FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

Based on the defendant's sworn Financial Affidavit and representations in open court, the

Court finds that the defendant is financially unable to obtain counsel. Pursuant to 18 USC § 3006A,

the Federal Public Defender for the Northern District of Texas is appointed as counsel of record for

the defendant for all proceedings, including any appeal.

SO ORDERED ON 8/31/2022.

Irma Carrillo Ramirez

Magistrate Judge

Case 3:22-mj-00844-BH Document 4 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 97
| (logo) ncb

National Cooperative Bank | 2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February 29, 2016

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance WFCM 2015 C29

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C29, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a. A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31, 2016.

 

Best regards,

 

/s/Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
# Official Journal C 358/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.358.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 358 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5521 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.358.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 358

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5521 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 358/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6685 — Ingram Micro/BrightPoint) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 358/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6685 — Ingram Micro/BrightPoint) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2012/C 358/02 | Thirteenth progress report on the implementation of the EU Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (2012/I) | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 358/03 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2012/C 358/02

Thirteenth progress report on the implementation of the EU Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (2012/I)

2

European Commission

2012/C 358/03

Euro exchange rates

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 358/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6740 — BayWa/Cefetra) (1) | 8 |
| 2012/C 358/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6754 — KM Holdings/KM Group) (1) | 9 |
| 2012/C 358/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6723 — Ferrovial/Qatar Holding/CDPQ/Baker Street/BAA) (1) | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 358/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6740 — BayWa/Cefetra) (1)

8

2012/C 358/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6754 — KM Holdings/KM Group) (1)

9

2012/C 358/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6723 — Ferrovial/Qatar Holding/CDPQ/Baker Street/BAA) (1)

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           23,402
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    21,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,436)
<INVENTORY>                                         551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 46,112
<PP&E>                                           26,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (12,422)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  106,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23,759
<BONDS>                                           5,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            104
<OTHER-SE>                                       77,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    106,566
<SALES>                                           6,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 98,685
<CGS>                                             4,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    88,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (454)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    297
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .44
        

</TABLE>
5YO . . 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
' .'-~- 591 
592 

594 

Tmntlq that this srtfsfaatorfLy ummra yow 

inquulry, wo alw 

vrry truly 3ollm 

APPROVEDAPR 1, 1941 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
#### HEADSPETH v. STATE.

No. 21574.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 23, 1941.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal June 4, 1941.

L. D. Johnston, of Waxahachie, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possessing whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, a fine of one hundred dollars.

In view of the fact that no judgment of conviction appears in the record, this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

KRUEGER, Judge.

At a former day of this term of court we dismissed the appeal in this case by reason of a defective record. Since then the record has been perfected. The appeal is therefore reinstated and the case will now be disposed of on its merits.

Appellant makes two contentions for a reversal of the conviction: First, that the court erred in declining to peremptorily instruct the jury to íeturn a verdict of not guilty because the evidence is insufficient to justify his conviction; and second, because the court declined to give appellant’s special requested instruction to the effect that the possession of not more than one quart of whisky is not prima facie evidence that it is possessed for the purpose of sale. His first contention rests entirely upon the facts proved upon the trial. The State’s testimony, briefly stated, shows that prohibition was in force in Ellis County; that on the 2nd day of August, 1940, an agent of the Texas Liquor Control Board, accompanied by the Constable of Precinct No. 1 of Ellis County, saw appellant as he drove up in front of his place of business in the town of Waxa-hachie. After he had gotten out of his car they engaged him in a conversation and inquired of him if he had any whisky, to which he replied: “Search me and see.” The officers searched him and found two pints of whisky on his person. This was all the evidence adduced by the State.

 Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence whatever, but relied entirely upon the fact that the State had failed to show that he possessed the whisky for the purpose of sale. We think appellant’s position is well taken. Not having more than one quart of whisky in his possession, it was not prima facie evidence that he had it for sale. See Art. 666 — 23a, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. Therefore, *808the State, in order to prove the charge in the complaint and information that appellant had the whisky for sale, was required to produce some evidence showing that he did possess it for that purpose. In this respect the State has failed. We believe that appellant was entitled to the special requested instruction or one of like import. See Emerson v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 502, 126 S.W.2d 971.

For the error pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court