alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00102-Z-BR

§

SEDDRICK ANDREW WRIGHT (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

SEDDRICK ANDREW WRIGHT (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining SEDDRICK ANDREW WRIGHT (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is

supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend 

that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that SEDDRICK ANDREW WRIGHT (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 

841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) - POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE FENTANYL and have sentence imposed 

accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: January 27, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00102-Z-BR Document 30 Filed 01/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 66
#### Ex parte McGREGOR.

No. 21923.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1941.

Neal Shurtleff, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant sought and obtained a writ of habeas corpus from the District Judge of Grimes County, claiming that he was held in restraint under an alleged illegal conviction in the County Court at Law of said county.

Upon a hearing the District Judge remanded appellant. It is recited in the remanding order that the court found that the conviction in the County Court was *808legal, and that the sheriff was holding him legally under said judgment of conviction.

There is among the papers a purported statement of facts, neither signed by the attorneys nor approved by the trial judge. We find nothing in the record which may be considered that in any way contradicts the findings of Judge Rogers in the remanding order.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Official Journal L 1/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 586 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 1

English edition

Legislation

Volume 586 January 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/4 of 5 January 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2015/5 of the European Central Bank of 19 November 2014 on the implementation of the asset-backed securities purchase programme (ECB/2014/45) | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/4 of 5 January 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2015/5 of the European Central Bank of 19 November 2014 on the implementation of the asset-backed securities purchase programme (ECB/2014/45)

(ECB/2014/45)

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kang Yihua , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By: __/s/ Kang Yihua___________________________             Kang Yihua

            Chief Executive Officer December 5, 2005
Opinion issued December 19, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00466-CV

———————————

PATRICK COX, Appellant

V.

LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2010-77634-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal was abated pending the parties’ performance of a settlement 

agreement and the filing of an agreed motion to dismiss. Appellant, Patrick Cox, 

subsequently filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in 
2

this appeal. We reinstate the appeal, grant the motion, and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower.
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 20 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 34
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                 
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Guam Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
# CA2004252EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 252/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 252/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
EX-31

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2015-LC21 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Operating Advisor, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer, Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, as Primary Servicer,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the La Gran Plaza Mortgage Loan, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicerfor the La Gran Plaza Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for the La Gran Plaza Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian for the La Gran Plaza Mortgage Loan, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor for the La GranPlaza Mortgage Loan, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the La Gran Plaza Mortgage Loan, and Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian for the La Gran Plaza Mortgage Loan on and after November 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated: March 16, 2022

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
CAPHRA Meet ing with EPA

February 7, 2013, 1:00 pm

List of Participants

Name Organization

1. Ed Scollon OPP/HED

2. Derek Gammon FMC

3. Vicki Dellarco OPP/IO

4. Susan Little CSPA/PIR

5. Neil Ahle Bayer An. Hlth

6. Kevin Crofton EPA

7. Matt Brooks LG

8. William Irwin EPA

9. Amechi Chukudebe BASF

10. Larry Sheets Bayer

11. Nasser Assaf Valent

12. Jim Bruckner Univ. GA

13. Anna Lowit EPA/HED

14. Tom Osmitz Science Strategies

15. Dana Friedman OP P/PRD

16. Tim Shafer EPA

17. Mike Hughes EPA
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

s0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147811

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147811

COA: 301758

Wayne CC: 10

- 001495

- FC

DARRELL RASHARD EWING,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 2:22-cr-00114-Z-BR Document 51 Filed 07/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 157
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 95

Designating the week of February 7 through 13, 1994, as ``Travel Agent 
                          Appreciation Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

   Mr. Oberstar introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of February 7 through 13, 1994, as ``Travel Agent 
                          Appreciation Week''.

Whereas travel and tourism has become one of the fastest growing industries in 
        the United States, generating more than $350,000,000,000 in 1992;
Whereas over 40,000 travel agencies in the United States perform many vital 
        services that save American consumers and business valuable time and 
        money;
Whereas both business and leisure travelers have come to rely on the travel 
        agent for accurate, professional advice;
Whereas travel agents are an integral part of the travel and tourism industry;
Whereas travel agents generated over $51,000,000,000 in revenue for the airline 
        industry in 1992 alone;
Whereas travel agents are located in all the 50 States in the United States, and 
        are an important source of jobs from entry level to middle management in 
        almost every town throughout the country; and
Whereas it is fitting to set aside a time to honor and recognize these highly 
        trained travel professionals: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of February 7 
through 13, 1994, is designated as ``Travel Agent Appreciation Week'', 
and the President is authorized to issue a proclamation calling upon 
the people of the United States to observe this week with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 LtCol Sean Charles Gaines Kern, a recent JAWS Graduate, published in Joint Forces Quarterly
 LtCol Sean Charles Gaines Kern, USAF, a recent JAWS Graduate, published *Expanding Combat Power Through Military Cyber Power Theory* in Joint Forces Quarterly, **4th Quarter 2015** The article can be found at the link below. http://dtic.mil/doctrine/jfq/jfq-79.pdf
 SHARE
 PRINT
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT HCIRCUIT T IPH ANI NI, AK

A Ping Ni , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. RO Y AL B USINE SS B ANK O F L O S ANG E L E S, a Califor nia c or por ation as suc c e ssorin inte r e st to Fir st Asian B ank of L a s V e gas, a Ne v ada c o r por ation , De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-56018 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-00605-R -JC M E M O RANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia M anue l L. R e a l , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d June4, 2015 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia 

# F IL ED JUN 09 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).pa ge 2

B e fore : K O Z INSKI and CAL L AH AN , C irc uit Judge s , a nd SING L E T O N , *** Se nior Distric t Judge . 1. Ni a rgue s we should a

pply Ne v a d a

la w to he r c la i m s, but shedoe sn’ t e xpla in why

a pply ing Ne v a da

la w “ will further the inte re sts of [Ne va da ] ,” so we a pply the la w of the forum

sta te , C a lifornia . Se e C R S R e c ove ry , Inc . v. Laxton, 600 F.3d 1138, 1142 (9th C ir. 2010). 2. The B ank c a

n’ t be he l d lia

b le for Tsa i’ s a c tions a s re sponde at supe rior be c a use Ni fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts e sta blishing tha

t Tsa i’ s c onduc t wa s “ ty

pic a l of or broa dly inc ide nt to”the B ank’ s busine ss. Se e M ary M . v. C ity

of L.A., 814 P.2d 1341, 1344 (C a l. 1991) (interna l quota tion m arks omi tte d). Though Tsai’ s job a t the b ank m ay

have “ se t thesta g e for [the ] m i sc onduc t,” tha t is insuffic i e nt to im pose re sponde at supe rior lia bility . Se e Lisa

M . v. He nry

M ay o Ne wha l l M e m ’ l Hosp., 907 P.2d 358, 367 (C a l. 1995). 3. The B ank c a

n’ t be he l d lia

b le for Tsa i’ s a c tions on a n a ge nc y the ory be c a use e ve n if Tsa i w a s theB ank’ s a ge nt, Ni doe sn’ t a lle g e fa c ts showing Tsa i a c te d within his “ a c tua l or oste nsiblea uthority ” in running the fraudule nt sc he m e . Se e Va n’ t R o od v. C nty . of Santa C l ara , 6 C a l. R

ptr. 3d 746, 765 (C t. App. 2003).

*** The Honora

ble Ja m e s K. Single ton, Se nior Distric t Judgefor the U.S. Distric t C ourt for theDistric t of Ala ska , sitting by de signa tion.pa ge 3

Inde e d , Ni’ s C o m

pla int doe s not a lle ge tha

t the B ank “ inte ntionally

or by wa nt of ordina ry c are ” sa nc tione d Tsa i’ s c onduc t. Se e Young v. Horiz on W . , Inc ., 163 C a l . R ptr. 3d 704, 713 (C t. App. 2013). 4. Ni’ s C om

pla int a l so doe sn’ t a lle ge suffic i e nt fa c ts to support he r ne glige nt hiring c la im . It c onta ins nothing m ore tha n “ [t] hre a d

ba re re c ita ls of the e le m e nts” of tha

t c la im , whic h “ do not suffic e . ” Ashc roft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). AFFIRM E D.