alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

AARON ALLEN WHITE, §

No. 118829, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:22-CV-190-Z-BR

§

SHERIFF BRIAN THOMAS, ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff, Aaron Allen White, filed a complaint naming Brian Thomas, Cindy NLN, NFN 

Fisher, NFN Cook, and NFN Castro as Defendants. By order signed March 31, 2023, the Court 

explained the deficiencies in the complaint and ordered Plaintiff to file by April 21, 2023, an 

amended complaint stating with specificity all material facts on which he would establish his right 

to recover against each defendant. The order cautioned that failure to comply might lead to the 

dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims without further notice. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with 

the order or communicate with the Court in any manner. 

RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons discussed herein, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the United States 

Magistrate Judge to the United States District Judge that the claims of Plaintiff be DISMISSED.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE

The United States District Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Findings, Conclusion and 

Recommendation to each party by the most efficient means available.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

ENTERED on May 1, 2023. 

Case 2:22-cv-00190-Z-BR Document 8 Filed 05/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 32
2

* NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT *

Any party may object to these proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. In the 

event parties wish to object, they are hereby NOTIFIED that the deadline for filing objections is 

fourteen (14) days from the date of filing as indicated by the “entered” date directly above the 

signature line. Service is complete upon mailing, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), or transmission by 

electronic means, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E). Any objections must be filed on or before the 

fourteenth (14th) day after this recommendation is filed as indicated by the “entered” date. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).

Any such objections shall be made in a written pleading entitled “Objections to the 

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation.” Objecting parties shall file the written objections 

with the United States District Clerk and serve a copy of such objections on all other parties. A 

party’s failure to timely file written objections shall bar an aggrieved party, except upon grounds 

of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings, legal 

conclusions, and recommendation set forth by the Magistrate Judge and accepted by the district 

court. See Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en 

banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), as recognized in ACS 

Recovery Servs., Inc. v. Griffin, 676 F.3d 512, 521 n.5 (5th Cir. 2012); Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 

F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1988).

Case 2:22-cv-00190-Z-BR Document 8 Filed 05/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 33
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H.R. 1009

To terminate the obligation of funds by the United States for the

superconducting super collider project.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. SLATTERY (for himself, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. GLICKMAN, Mr. PENNY, Mr.

FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. VENTO, Mr. JOHNSTON

of Florida, Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. EVANS, Mr. STARK, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr.

POSHARD, Mr. PORTER, Mr. ANDREWS, of Maine, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr.

VISCLOSKY, Mr. REED, Mr. DOOLEY, Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey, Mr.

HERGER, and Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

A BILL

To terminate the obligation of funds by the United States

for the superconducting super collider project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the United States shall not, after the date of enact4 ment of this Act, obligate any funds for the

5 superconducting super collider project.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. OA01-1-000]

Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Central Maine Power Company (CMP) tendered for filing, pursuant to Section 37.4(c) of the Code of Federal Regulations, 18 CFR 37.4(c), the revised Standards of Conduct to be followed by CMP personnel.

                    CMP requests that the Standards of Conduct become effective on November 10, 2000.                          ( print page 70337)    

CMP served copies of the filing upon the Maine Public Utilities Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before December 1, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc/​fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29853  Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 11
                       WALNUT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
                       -------------------------------
               Statement re: Calculation of Per Share Earnings




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Nine months ended September 30,             Three months ended September 30,
                                      1996                    1995                   1996                1995
                               ----------------           ---------------     -----------------        ---------------
<S>                           <C>                       <C>                    <C>                     <C>
Net income (loss)             $      363,383            $     (270,572)         $       (915,932)         $   2,330,296
Shares:
Weighted average number
of shares of common stock
outstanding                       14,122,549                12,404,457                14,616,687             13,605,250
Shares issuable upon                                                                                    
exercise of dilutive
options and warrants                 342,973                         0                   130,145                762,610
                              --------------            --------------          -----------------         -------------
          Total                   14,465,522                12,404,457                14,746,832(1)          14,367,860
                              ==============            ==============          =================         =============
Income (loss) per share of
       common stock           $         0.03            $        (0.02)        $           (0.06)                  0.16
                              ==============            ==============         =================          =============

</TABLE>

        (1) The results of this calculation for the three month period
        ending September 30, 1996 are antidilutive and, as such, are
        not presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
        Operations. The weighted average shares used in the
        calculation for per share earnings for the three months ended
        September 30, 1996 are 14,616,687.

                                Page 17 of 18
L]NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-062-01-H

STEVE BOYCE THOMAS,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERIYING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bX1), the undersigned District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilry and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated Novemb ", 7 ,zozz.

JAMES S HENDRIX

IIN STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-00062-H-BU Document 57 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 120
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ABILENE DIVISION 

GEORGE T. SHELTON, §

 § 

 Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No, 1:22-CV-157-H 

 v. §

§

RANGER COLLEGE, § 

§ 

§

 Defendant. § 

_______________________________________________________ 

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

 

Plaintiff George Todd Shelton objects to Defendant’s Motion for partial summary 

judgment on his claim for race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 on the following 

grounds: 

1. The evidence does not support defendant’s contention that facts are 

undisputed. 

2. The material facts offered by defendant as a basis for its motion are 

not material. 

Case 1:22-cv-00157-H Document 18 Filed 09/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 141
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAGE 2 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

s/ N. Sue Allen 

 N. Sue Allen

Texas Bar No. 00791992 

1345 FM 1187, Suite 113 

Mansfield, Texas 76063 

Telephone: (817) 926-5005 

Facsimile: (817) 926-5165 

Email: sue@sueallenlaw.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing instrument was served September 21, 

2023, to the following counsel of record for defendant via the Court’s ECF filing system to 

 Mr. Craig Wood 

Ms. Meredith P. Walker 

WALSH GALLEGOS TREVINO KYLE & ROBINSON, P.C., 

1020 NE LOOP 410, Ste. 450 

San Antonio, Texas 78209 

 

 s/ N. Sue Allen 

 N. Sue Allen

Case 1:22-cv-00157-H Document 18 Filed 09/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 142
Discussion	of	

	“Exorbitant	privilege	and	exorbitant	

duty”	by	Gourinchas,	Rey,	Govillot

Treasury	conference	

16th	of	November	2012	

Ricardo	Reis	

Columbia	University	

1	
Current	account	and	foreign	assets	

2	

NFAt+1 = rt+1NFAt + CAt+1

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 12

10

8

6

4

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

CAt

GDPt

(%)

NFAt

GDPt (%)
The	exorbitant	privilege	

3	

NFAt+1 = rt+1NFAt + CAt+1
More	substance	

4	

1. Increasingly,	U.S.	liabiliLes	are	government	debt,	

and	foreign	assets	are	equity	and	direct	investment.	

2. But	excess	return	also	within	asset	classes	

3. True	in	the	pre	and	post	BrePon	Woods	period.	

The exorbitant privilege (2/2)

1952-2009 1952-1972 1973-2009

Rex 2.69% 1.30% 3.47%

Rex(equity) 4.11% 3.96% 4.19%

Rex(debt) 4.71% 4.79% 4.67%

Rex(directinv) 4.00% 2.24% 4.99%

Lower overall EP: ”other assets” category with small (or negative) EP

premium

I Bank loans and trade credit

I Not good insurance contracts?

Is there a different EP premium for corporate vs. government debt?
Compared	with	other	countries	

5	
Exorbitant	duty?	

6	
Gourinchas-Rey-Govillot	account	

7	

Risk	sharing,	US	less	risk	averse:	privilege	is	a	risk	

premium,	duty	is	claim	payment	

QuesLons:	

1. Should	also	see	US	consumpLon	more	volaLle.	

2. Why	no	change	in	current	account?	

3. Where	are	claims	being	paid,	other	side	of	market?	
Compared	with	other	countries	

8	
AlternaLve	account	

9	

• US	as	a	hedge	fund.	

• High	returns	for	a	while,	eventually	low	returns.	

• Alpha	and	beta.	

• 2007-08	is	key	for	acLon:	fall	in	price	of	equiLes,	rise	

in	price	of	bonds.	U.S.	hedge	fund	has	bad	year.	

• Monetary	and	fiscal	policy	going	forward.
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 74 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 225
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 74 Filed 09/28/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 226
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 1 of 27 PageID 408
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 2 of 27 PageID 409
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 3 of 27 PageID 410
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 4 of 27 PageID 411
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 5 of 27 PageID 412
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 6 of 27 PageID 413
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 7 of 27 PageID 414
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 8 of 27 PageID 415
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 9 of 27 PageID 416
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 10 of 27 PageID 417
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 11 of 27 PageID 418
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 12 of 27 PageID 419
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 13 of 27 PageID 420
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 14 of 27 PageID 421
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 15 of 27 PageID 422
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 16 of 27 PageID 423
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 17 of 27 PageID 424
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 18 of 27 PageID 425
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 19 of 27 PageID 426
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 20 of 27 PageID 427
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 21 of 27 PageID 428
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 22 of 27 PageID 429
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 23 of 27 PageID 430
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 24 of 27 PageID 431
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 25 of 27 PageID 432
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 26 of 27 PageID 433
Case 3:22-cr-00378-N Document 49 Filed 02/15/24 Page 27 of 27 PageID 434
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29749]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SKILL STANDARDS BOARD


Notice of Open Meeting

AGENCY: National Skill Standards Board.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Skill Standards Board was established by an Act 
of Congress, the National Skill Standards Act, Title V, Pub. L. 103-
227. The 25-member National Skill Standards Board will serve as a 
catalyst and be responsible for the development and implementation of a 
voluntary national system of skills standards and certification through 
voluntary partnerships which have the full and balanced participation 
of business, labor, education, civil rights organizations and other key 
groups.
    Time & Place: The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 
approximately 12 p.m. on Friday, December 8, 2000, at The Holiday Inn 
Select Hotel, 480 King St., Alexandria, VA 22314, in the Carlyle 
Ballroom. (703) 549-6080.
    Agenda: The agenda for the Board Meeting will include: An update 
from the Board's committees; presentations from representatives of the 
Education and Training Voluntary Partnership (E&TVP), Hospitality and 
Tourism Skill Standards Council (HTSSC), Manufacturing Skill Standards 
Council (MSSC) and Sales & Service Voluntary Partnership (S&SVP).
    Public Participation: The meeting, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m., is 
open to the public. Seating is limited and will be available on a 
first-come, first-served basis. Seats will be reserved for the media. 
Individuals with disabilities should contact Leslie Donaldson at (202) 
254-8628 if special accommodations are needed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Wilcox, Executive Deputy Director 
at (202) 254-8628.

    Signed at Washington, DC, 15th day of November, 2000.
Edie West,
Executive Director, National Skill Standards Board.
[FR Doc. 00-29749 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
# 21_Home (2)

# Original

# 2017 AY

# 2018 AY

# 2019 AY

# 2020 AY

# 2021 AY

# Lists
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: September 12, 2018 

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960 

Readout of Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting

Washington – U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive session at the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury. 

The Council made a final decision to grant the appeal of ZB, N.A. under section 117 of the 

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). With the 

Council’s decision, ZB will not be treated as a designated nonbank financial company upon 

completion of ZB’s proposed merger with its parent bank holding company, Zions 

Bancorporation.

During the meeting, the Council also discussed its 2018 annual report and the ongoing 

reevaluation of its designation of a nonbank financial company.

In addition, the Council voted to approve its fiscal year 2019 budget and the minutes of its 

previous meeting on July 17.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved budget and 

meeting minutes is available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
----

(2004/C 65 E/014)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3502/02

by Robert Evans (PSE) to the Commission

(10 December 2002)

Subject:   Bear bile farming in China

Would the Commission inform me as to what influence and assistance the Commission is offering the Chinese Government in order to stop the cruel practice of farming bears for their bile?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(16 January 2003)

China has traditionally used bear bile for medical purposes. Since the 1980's commercial ‘bear farming’ has been used to obtain bile for traditional Chinese medicines.

The Commission is aware that this practice arose because of increasing conservation concerns about the killing of wild bears for this purpose. Nevertheless, the Commission also shares the Honourable Member's concern over the possible implications of such a practice for animal welfare. The Union has one of the highest animal welfare standards in the world and public awareness regarding animal welfare is high. Furthermore, a comprehensive set of legislation has been adopted that covers a wide range of issues relating to animal well being.

The Commission's policies promote the improved protection and respect for the welfare of animals as sentient beings, both internally and internationally, since it is of the opinion that high animal welfare standards must be ensured globally.

The Community will continue to actively pursue substantive negotiations on animal welfare and is co-operating at the international level in order to improve animal welfare policies world-wide. To do so, it seeks to develop high multilateral standards within the framework of specific international conventions, mainly within the framework of the Council of Europe and the World Organisation for Animal Health.

----
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 58

Designating the honeybee as the national insect.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. NEAL of North Carolina introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the honeybee as the national insect.

Whereas the honeybee has been recognized since biblical

times as an embodiment of the virtues of industry, ingenuity, thrift, and selflessness, qualities that reflect some

of the most basic and honored ideals of the Nation;

Whereas the honeybee is an unsung yet essential link in the

chain of American agriculture, pollinating an estimated

19 billion dollars’ worth of crops annually;

Whereas the honeybee population is declining under pressure

from urbanization and the misuse of pesticides, resulting

in a loss of honey and beeswax and in reduced yields of

fruits, vegetables, flowers, and shrubs because of inadequate pollination;
2

•HJ 58 IH

Whereas concern for the honeybee has created public awareness of the urgent need to preserve and protect these valuable creatures;

Whereas at the present time honeybees are kept in all 50 of

the United States;

Whereas many communities across the Nation hold annual

festivals of art, crafts, and music in honor of the honeybee;

Whereas the Postal Service honored the honeybee by issuing

a 25-cent stamp on September 2, 1988, in Omaha, Nebraska, and an embossed envelope on October 10, 1980,

in Paris, Illinois;

Whereas 18 States have already adopted the honeybee as

their official State insect, and Utah is nicknamed the

‘‘Beehive State’’ in honor of the honeybee; and

Whereas it would be in the best interests of the people of the

United States for the honeybee to be adopted as our national insect: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the insect commonly known as the honeybee is des4 ignated and adopted as the national insect of the United

5 States, and the President is authorized and requested to

6 declare such fact by proclamation.

Æ