alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 121

Designating the week beginning April 18, 1993, as ‘‘Primary Immune

Deficiency Awareness Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. NADLER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning April 18, 1993, as ‘‘Primary

Immune Deficiency Awareness Week’’.

Whereas primary immune deficiency is a congenital defect in

the immune system such that the body cannot adequately

defend itself from infection;

Whereas primary immune deficiency is most often diagnosed

in children and affects more children than leukemia and

lymphoma combined;

Whereas primary immune deficiency is believed to affect

500,000 Americans and possibly more because people are

undiagnosed and misdiagnosed;
2

•HJ 121 IH

Whereas many forms of primary immune deficiency are inherited;

Whereas there are currently considered to be 70 forms of primary immune deficiency ranging from SCVID which is

fatal if left untreated to chronic recurring infections and

allergies that cannot be managed with prophylactic antibiotics;

Whereas the earliest symptoms of primary immune deficiency

are easily confused with a number of common illnesses or

infections so that physicians often fail to diagnose and

treat the underlying problem;

Whereas once suspected, primary immune deficiency can be

diagnosed through a series of blood screenings which test

immune function;

Whereas early intervention and treatment can save lives as

well as prevent permanent damage to lungs and other

organs;

Whereas many forms of treatment are available once a specific diagnosis is made, procedures such as BMT may result in complete cure, and other treatments like monthly

infusions complete cure, and other treatments like

monthly infusions of gamma globulin dramatically reduces a patient’s risk of infections and enables him or

her to lead a normal life;

Whereas patients may have long periods of normal health

then suddenly be struck by severe fevers and infections;

Whereas lack of public awareness can lead to anxiety and

leave families isolated and confused; and

Whereas education is essential to make the general public,

health care professionals, employers, and insurers more
3

•HJ 121 IH

knowledgeable about primary immune deficiency: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning April 18, 1993, is designated as

4 ‘‘Primary Immune Deficiency Awareness Week’’, and the

5 President is authorized and requested to issue a proclama6 tion calling upon the people of the United States to ob7 serve such a week with appropriate programs, ceremonies,

8 and activities.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-06-1997
<CASH>                                          79,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,026
<PP&E>                                          78,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,132
<BONDS>                                          1,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           292
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,576
<SALES>                                         46,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,188
<CGS>                                           32,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,230)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,094)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<FN>
<F1>Filed due to a change in financial reporting year-end to the Sunday nearest to
December 31 of each year. Previously, the fiscal year ended the Sunday nearest
December 1.
<F2>Reflects Basic EPS and a 3 for 2 stock split which was effected in the form
of a 50% dividend paid on March 6, 1998. Financial data schedules previously
filed have not been restated to reflect this stock split.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIRTRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD UnauthorizedAir Transportation, Unfair andDeceptive Practices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unfair andDeceptive Practices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations of Public CharterRules EnforcementProceeding

STATUS REPORT DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: May 29,2015
Respectfully submitted,

# 6~;J!V~ Blane Workie Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Vinh Q. Nguyen Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-71523 DocketNo. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that on this Twenty-Ninth day ofMay, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Status Report was served inthe following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 ByFirst Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 Scot Spencer 22604 Esplanada Circle BocaRaton, Florida 33433
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BARRY JAMEL ALEXANDER, a/k/a Manny , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. ( 2:19

- cr - 00005

- RBS

- LRL

- 1 )

Submitted : July 10, 2023 Decided: July 14, 2023

Before KING and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Barry Jamel Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7388 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/14/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Barry Jamel Alexander appeals the dist rict court ’ s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Alexander is ineligible for a sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L.
No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. Accordingly, we affirm

. United States v. Alexander , No. 2:19

- cr - 00005

- RBS

- LRL

- 1 ( E.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7388 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/14/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
14910-13-P] _c

~~. ANM-1I4

IU· Hc.d~V1

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON

14 CFR Part 39

"n

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0865; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-023-AD; Amendment 11- l'l-P,,!

llo IlP g UTlNe; S""","L

39-**; AD **1 201 D -ol-ro - '1

)lITi>\Ul'iKi

Federal Aviation Administration

RlN 2120-AA64 U, U--

tt

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, I z.../0IJ1

_c

747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes Equippe - 1110\-

with General Electric CF6-45 or -50 Series Engines, or Equipped with Pratt & Whitney

JT9D-3 or -7 (Excluding -70) Series Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FM), Department of Transportation

(DOn.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD), which •......... , t:7t)

applies to certain Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B,

747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP series aiIplancs. That AD currently

o

requires repetitive inspections to detect cracks and fractures of the strut front spar chord

assembly (including the forward side) at each strut location, and repair if necessary. Thi l~jTI"'l."I"{]

new AD adds a one-time inspection for cracking of the forward side of the front spar

chord assembly on the inboard and outboard struts, installation of a cap skin doubler for

certain airplanes, and repair if necessary. These actions terminate the repetitive

inspections of the forward side of the strut front spar chord assembiy~ the inspections of

the aft side assembly continue as specified in the existing AD. This AD results from a

OUTING SYMIlOL

report of a fractured front spar assembly for strut No.3, which resulted in the loss of the

strut upper link load path. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks and

fractures of the nacelle strut front spar chord assembly. Fracture of the front spar chord

NITIA'.5IS'G

'ATE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL GEOFFREY PETERS, §

TDCJ No. 2019190, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-2162-B

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, ET AL., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in

this case as to Plaintiff’s amended complaint. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

DATE: October 20 2022. th

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02162-B-BN Document 5 Filed 10/20/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Carey, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered March 9, 1989, convicting him of attempted arson in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s assertion that his plea allocution was factually insufficient is not preserved for appellate review, and in any event is without merit *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Warren,*47 NY2d 740; *People v Wedgewood,*106 AD2d 674). The defendant’s remaining contention has not been preserved for appellate review *(cf., People v Quiles,*72 AD2d 610). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARMONA

- ROJAS,

Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 17

- 72741 Agency No. A098

- 761

- 930

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 22, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Juan Carmona

- Rojas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 31 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 72741

the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v . Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir.
2008). We deny the petition for review.
In his opening brief, Carmona

- Rojas does not challenge the agency’s
determination that he failed to establish past persecution

. See Corro

- Barragan v.

Holder , 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening
brief resulted in waiver)

. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination

that Carmona

- Rojas has not established that it is more likely than not he will be
persecuted in Mexico on acc ount of his family membership. See Ayala v. Holder , 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social
group is established, an applicant must still show that “persecution was or will be
on account of his membership in such gro up”); Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007,
1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by
criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members has no nexus to
a protected ground”) . We reject Carmona

- Rojas’s contention th at the BIA failed to
properly analyze his withholding of removal claim in light of recent case law.
Thus, we deny the petition for review as to his withholding of removal claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6370** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. PHILLIP FLEMING , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. David C. Norton , Chief District Judge. ( 2:06

- cr - 00655

- DCN

- 1 )

Submitted : August 18, 2011 Decided: August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Phillip Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Phillip Fleming appeals the district c ourt’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Flemin g , No. 2:06

- cr - 00655

- DCN

- 1 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2010). We deny Fleming’s motion for preparation of transcripts at government
expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the c ourt and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
A FFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 380 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 380

        To designate the year 1995 as ``Jazz Centennial Year''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1994

  Mr. Jefferson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
        To designate the year 1995 as ``Jazz Centennial Year''.

Whereas jazz is the most widely recognized indigenous art form in the United 
        States and was designated as a rare and valuable national treasure by 
        the Congress in 1987;
Whereas New Orleans, Louisiana is widely recognized as the birthplace of jazz 
        and continues as a center for the employment, performance, preservation, 
        development, and progression of jazz;
Whereas the Louisiana Music Commission, an organization funded by the State of 
        Louisiana to promote the awareness and development of the State's 
        abundant music resources, has convened a prominent group of music 
        historians, players, and supporters to create the New Orleans Jazz 
        Centennial Celebration;
Whereas the Louisiana Music Commission has chosen 1995 as the centennial of 
        jazz, based on a general benchmark relating to the formation of the 
        Buddy Bolden band; and
Whereas the chairman of the Louisiana Music Commission announced to the 
        International Association of Jazz Educators that a year-long 
        commemoration of the centennial of jazz will take place throughout 1995: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the year 1995 is hereby 
designated as ``Jazz Centennial Year''. The President is authorized and 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to observe this year with appropriate ceremonies and activities 
that promote a better understanding and awareness of--
            (1) jazz as a rare and valuable national treasure;
            (2) the appropriate means by which all Americans may learn 
        about our Nation's most widely recognized indigenous art form; 
        and
            (3) how this national treasure can be preserved and 
        promoted for the enjoyment of future generations.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cv-02174-K-BT Document 13 Filed 11/07/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 58
Case 3:22-cv-02174-K-BT Document 13 Filed 11/07/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 59
Case 3:22-cv-02174-K-BT Document 13 Filed 11/07/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 60
Case 3:22-cv-02174-K-BT Document 13 Filed 11/07/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 61
Case 3:22-cv-02174-K-BT Document 13 Filed 11/07/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 62
Case 3:22-cv-02174-K-BT Document 13 Filed 11/07/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 63
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 23-0258

_________________

LEON MICHAEL FORD,

 Petitioner,

 v.

MONTANA FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT, HON. MIKE MENAHAN, Presiding,

 Respondent.

O R D E R

_________________

Petitioner Leon Ford seeks a writ of supervisory control over the First Judicial District 

Court following its April 26, 2023 refusal during the final pretrial conference to continue

Ford’s May 30 deliberate homicide trial. Ford sought the continuance after receiving a 

report that excluded him as a source of DNA on cable/zip ties found with the victim’s 

remains. The report disclosed DNA of an unidentified male, and Crites has retained DNA 

experts to attempt to identify the source. Citing his constitutional right to obtain exculpatory 

evidence, Ford claims the District Court is proceeding under a mistake of law, and appeal 

would afford an inadequate remedy. 

Having reviewed the petition and the District Court’s bench ruling, the Court deems it 

advisable to obtain a summary response. Cognizant of the trial date, the Court 

HEREBY ORDERS that the Respondent, the State of Montana, or both, are granted 

seven (7) days from the date of this Order within which to file a response to the Petition in 

accordance with M. R. App. P. 14(7)(a). 

The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to all counsel of 

record in the District Court’s Cause No. ADC 2020-0493 and to the Honorable Mike 

Menahan, presiding Judge.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 8 2023

05/08/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0258
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000942136
<NAME> CRA MANAGED CARE INC
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                       1,692,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,844,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,366,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,109,000
<PP&E>                                      22,331,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,765,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,378,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,750,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  80,697,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,378,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,489,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,571,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,251,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                61,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             140,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,527,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,432,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,095,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,095,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>