59960 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

receive notification of claimed 

infringement, periodic validation or 

amendment thereof, as well as the fee 

for the listing of alternative names. 

Dated: September 21, 2011. 

Maria A. Pallante, 

Register of Copyrights. 

[FR Doc. 2011–24780 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–30–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 261 

[EPA–R06–RCRA–2009–0312; SW FRL–

9472–6] 

Hazardous Waste Management 

System; Identification and Listing of 

Hazardous Waste; Withdrawal of 

proposed rule 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Because EPA has discovered 

additional information which we 

believe is pertinent for consideration in 

this decision, we are withdrawing the 

proposed rule to grant an exclusion for 

Republic Services, Inc./BFI Gulf West 

Landfill (Gulf West) located in Anahuac, 

TX, published on January 28, 2011. This 

notice removes the proposed rule 

published in 76 FR 5110 (January 28, 

2011) for public review and comment. 

FOR FURTHER TECHNICAL INFORMATION

CONTACT: Michelle Peace by mail at U.S. 

EPA Region 6, Multimedia Planning and 

Permitting Division, Corrective Action 

and Waste Minimization Section (6PD– 

C), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202, 

by phone at (214) 665–7430 or by e-mail 

at peace.michelle@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because 

EPA has discovered additional 

information pertinent to the final 

disposition of the petition, we are 

withdrawing the proposed rule for 

Republic Services, Inc./BFI Gulf West 

Landfill (Gulf West) located in Anahuac, 

TX, published on January 28, 2011 (76 

FR 5110). EPA subsequently received 

information after the comment period 

which highlighted several deficiencies 

in the data submitted by Gulf West. EPA 

will return the December 2009 petition 

submitted by Gulf West. No further 

action will be taken on this petition. A 

new petition will be required for this 

waste stream. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 261 

Environmental protection, Hazardous 

waste, Recycling, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: Sec. 3001(f) RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 

6921(f). 

Dated: September 14, 2011. 

Carl E. Edlund, 

Division Director, Multimedia Planning and 

Permitting Division, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2011–24984 Filed 9–27–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 67 

[Docket ID FEMA–2011–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1220] 

Proposed Flood Elevation 

Determinations 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on 

the proposed Base (1% annual-chance) 

Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed 

BFE modifications for the communities 

listed in the table below. The purpose 

of this proposed rule is to seek general 

information and comment regarding the 

proposed regulatory flood elevations for 

the reach described by the downstream 

and upstream locations in the table 

below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are 

a part of the floodplain management 

measures that the community is 

required either to adopt or to show 

evidence of having in effect in order to 

qualify or remain qualified for 

participation in the National Flood 

Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, 

these elevations, once finalized, will be 

used by insurance agents and others to 

calculate appropriate flood insurance 

premium rates for new buildings and 

the contents in those buildings. 

DATES: Comments are to be submitted 

on or before December 27, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The corresponding 

preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map 

(FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each 

community is available for inspection at 

the community’s map repository. The 

respective addresses are listed in the 

table below. 

You may submit comments, identified 

by Docket No. FEMA–B–1220, to Luis 

Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 

Management Branch, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–4064, or (e-mail) 

luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis 

Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 

Management Branch, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–4064, or (e-mail) 

luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) proposes to make 

determinations of BFEs and modified 

BFEs for each community listed below, 

in accordance with section 110 of the 

Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 

42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a). 

These proposed BFEs and modified 

BFEs, together with the floodplain 

management criteria required by 44 CFR 

60.3, are the minimum that are required. 

They should not be construed to mean 

that the community must change any 

existing ordinances that are more 

stringent in their floodplain 

management requirements. The 

community may at any time enact 

stricter requirements of its own or 

pursuant to policies established by other 

Federal, State, or regional entities. 

These proposed elevations are used to 

meet the floodplain management 

requirements of the NFIP and also are 

used to calculate the appropriate flood 

insurance premium rates for new 

buildings built after these elevations are 

made final, and for the contents in those 

buildings. 

Comments on any aspect of the Flood 

Insurance Study and FIRM, other than 

the proposed BFEs, will be considered. 

A letter acknowledging receipt of any 

comments will not be sent. 

National Environmental Policy Act. 

This proposed rule is categorically 

excluded from the requirements of 44 

CFR part 10, Environmental 

Consideration. An environmental 

impact assessment has not been 

prepared. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood 

elevation determinations are not within 

the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory 

flexibility analysis is not required. 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review. This proposed 

rule is not a significant regulatory action 

under the criteria of section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, as amended. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism. 

This proposed rule involves no policies 

that have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform. This proposed rule meets the 

applicable standards of Executive Order 

12988. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS