alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SureWestCommunications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 5, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham    |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                   |   | Steven C. Oldham,       |
|                   |   | President and           |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to SureWest Communications and will beretained by SureWest Communications and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificate is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q andshall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

 

----
Case 5:22-cr-00041-H-BQ Document 110 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 265
Case 3:22-cr-00390-S Document 12 Filed 10/26/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 28
Case 3:22-cr-00390-S Document 12 Filed 10/26/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 29
Case 3:22-cr-00390-S Document 12 Filed 10/26/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 30
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ EDWARD J. SIMPKINS, Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

______________________

2012-3201

______________________ Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC844E110968-I-1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R
Edward J. Simpkins moves for leave to supplementthe record on appeal. The Office of Personnel Management opposes. Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :The motion for leave to supplement the record is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to Case: 12-3201 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 01/14/2013EDWARD SIMPKINS v. OPM 2 hear this case. A copy of the motion and Simpkins’s submission shall be transmitted to the merits panel.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s25 Case: 12-3201 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 01/14/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,836,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,296,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          49,905,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            49,724,000
<LOANS>                                        206,082,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,337,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,167,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     253,139,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,400,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,490,438
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         4,919,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,532,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 281,167,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,692,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,744,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   414,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,850,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,853,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,995,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      630,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,948,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,872,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,742,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,742,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.37
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,863,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                            84
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,958,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      416,000
<RECOVERIES>                                       165,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,337,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,337,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-93-000]

                    Take notice that on November 13, 2000, Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Kern River) tendered for filing and acceptance its compliance filing in response to the Commission's order issued on October 27, 2000, in Docket Nos. RM96-1-014                     *et seq.*                     (Order).                

Kern River states that it is in compliance with the Order, which pertains to imbalance netting and trading transactions.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions and protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​      ( print page 70338)    rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29862  Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 89 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 89

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
            relating to voluntary prayer in public schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

    Mr. Rahall introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
            relating to voluntary prayer in public schools.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this Constitution shall prohibit the inclusion of 
voluntary prayer in any public school program or activity. Neither the 
United States nor any State shall prescribe the content of any such 
prayer.''.

                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-259-Y 

 § 

AUSTIN RAY CRAVER (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 29, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00259-Y Document 28 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 104
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2211

EDWARD D. PLOTZKER, M.D.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief United States District Court Judge 

for the District of Columbia; AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY, 

Incorporated; KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP; GEORGE WASHINGTON 

UNIVERSITY, d/b/a George Washington University Medical 

Center; KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP; JOHN AND JANE DOES,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, 

District Judge. (3:08-cv-00027-nkm-bwc)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward D. Plotzker, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, James Worth 

Draughn, Jr., KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP, Washington, D.C., K. 

Lorraine Lord, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Melissa

Wolf Riley, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlottesville, Virginia, Adam 

Howard Charnes, KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP, Winston-Salem, North 

Carolina, for Appellees. 
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Edward D. Plotzker, M.D., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his 

various claims against them. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on October 22, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on October 

20, 2009. Because Plotzker failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SUPERCELL OY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GREE, INC., GREE INTERNATIONAL 

ENTERTAINMENT, INC., FUNZIO GAMES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2019-1662

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 4:17-cv-05556-YGR, 

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

MICHAEL JOHN SACKSTEDER, Fenwick & West, LLP, 

San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by BRYAN ALEXANDER KOHM; CRYSTAL ADA 

NWANERI, Mountain View, CA; GEOFFREY ROBERT MILLER, 

New York, NY. 

 JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton 

LLP, Raleigh, NC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also 

represented by STEVEN MOORE, TAYLOR JACQUELINE 

Case: 19-1662 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2020
PFINGST, San Francisco, CA; ANDREW WILLIAM RINEHART, 

Winston-Salem, NC. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and 

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

March 10, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1662 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2020
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00006-CR

Keith Shawn Lewis, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 54420, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Keith Shawn Lewis seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for intoxication

assault. The trial court has certified that this is a plea bargain case and Lewis has no right of appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The appeal is dismissed. Rule 25.2(d).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 23, 2004

Do Not Publish
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., CommercialMortgage  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS1

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Emory University, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on 
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be 
viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, 
for such purposes as each is intended to be used, is being manufactured 
in the United States.
    Docket Number: 00-027. Applicant: Emory University, Atlanta, GA 
30322. Instrument: Slice Physiology Setup. Manufacturer: Luigs and 
Neumann, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 58046, September 
27, 2000. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides superposition of 
recorded fluorescent images with positional information from a 
microscope for precise positioning of tissue structures in the field of 
interest in the microscope. Advice received from: National Institutes 
of Health, October 30, 2000.
    Docket Number: 00-031. Applicant: University of Georgia, Athens, GA 
30602. Instrument: (Two) Plant Growth Chambers, Model GC8-2H. 
Manufacturer: Enconair Ecological Chambers, Canada. Intended Use: See 
notice at 65 FR 59175, October 4, 2000. Reasons: The foreign instrument 
provides: (1) Capability to diagnose malfunction of chamber via 
telephone modem connection and (2) automatic notification of laboratory 
personnel of chamber malfunction by factor monitoring using synthesized 
voice messages. Advice received from: National Institutes of Health, 
October 30, 2000.
    The National Institutes of Health advises in its memoranda that (1) 
the capabilities of each of the foreign instruments described above are 
pertinent to each applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no 
domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value for the 
intended use of each instrument. We know of no other instrument or 
apparatus being manufactured in the United States which is of 
equivalent scientific value to either of the foreign instruments.

Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 00-29632 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-301-Y 

 § 

DAVID JIMENEZ (3) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED November 28, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00301-Y Document 45 Filed 11/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 87
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FT. WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS 

Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendant

§ 

§ 

§

§

§

§

§ Case No. 4:22-CV-00343

V.

§

§

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, MCGAUGHEY, 

REBER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., JULIE 

HEDRICK, ERIK HARRIS, LARRY 

SALAS, JOSH BLACK

Defendants, Counterclaim Plaintiff.

§

§

§

§

§

§

SECOND AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and LR 3.1(c), L.R 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.1(a)(4)(D) and 

LR 81.2, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Robert “Bob” Ross provides the following information:

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state “None”):

None.

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporation,

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporation or other legal entities that 

are financially interested in the outcome of this case:

1. Association of Professional Flight Attendant (“APFA”);

2. Julie Hedrick, National President of APFA (“Hedrick”);

3. Erik Harris, National Treasurer of APFA (“Harris”);

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 125-2 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2597
2

4. Larry Salas, National Vice-President of APFA (“Salas”);

5. Josh Black, National Secretary of APFA (“Black”);

6. McGaughey Reber and Associates, Inc d/b/a Diversified Credit Systems;

7. Members of, and individuals represented by the APFA; and

8. Robert “Bob” Ross, former National President of APFA (“Plaintiff 

Counterclaim Defendant”).

Date: September 27, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

K.D. PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, PLLC

By: /s/ Kerri Phillips

Kerri Phillips

Texas Bar No. 24065906 

Phone: (972) 327-5800

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com

6010 W. Spring Creek Parkway

Plano, Texas 75024

Fax: (940) 400-0089

For Service of Filings: 

notice@KDphillipslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 27th day of September, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

document was served on the below listed counsels of record for Defendant/Counterclaim 

Plaintiffs by means permitted by Rule 5(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

(“F.R.C.P.”).

Jeff Bartos

James Sanford

Antonia Bird

Charlette Matts

Michael Rake

/s/ Kerri Phillips

Kerri Phillips

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 125-2 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2598