alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Acceptance of Responsibility - Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. No. 4:22-CR-036-Y

JOSEPH MICHAEL DUPREE (01)

GOVERNMENT=S NOTICE REGARDING

ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY

The United States of America files this Government=s Motion Regarding 

Acceptance of Responsibility, pursuant to USSG § 3E1.1(b), and would show as follows:

If the Court determines that the Defendant is entitled to a reduction for Acceptance 

of Responsibility, and that his offense level is 16 or greater, the Government moves that 

the Defendant receive an additional third point reduction for Acceptance of 

Responsibility, pursuant to USSG § 3E1.1(b), because the Defendant has assisted 

authorities in the investigation or prosecution of his own misconduct by timely notifying 

authorities of his intention to enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the government to 

avoid preparing for trial and permitting the government and the court to allocate their 

resources efficiently. 

Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 27 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 55
Acceptance of Responsibility - Page 2

Respectfully submitted, 

CHAD E. MEACHAM 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/ P.J. Meitl 

P.J. MEITL

Assistant United States Attorney

District of Columbia Bar No. 502391

Virginia Bar No. 73215

1100 Commerce Street, Third Floor

Dallas, Texas 76242-1699

Telephone: 214-659-8600

Fax: 214-659-8805

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 23, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the clerk for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the 

electronic case filing system of the court. The electronic case filing system sent a ANotice 

of Electronic Filing@ to the following attorney of record who has consented in writing to 

accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means.

s/ P.J. Meitl 

P.J. MEITL

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 27 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 56
----

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) (2)

(2006/C 182/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

AUSTRIA

Operating licences revoked

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

----

(1)OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

----
Case 3:22-cv-03271-C-BK Document 13 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 35
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 378 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 378

      Commemorating June 22, 1994, as the 50th anniversary of the 
                 Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1994

  Mr. Montgomery (for himself and Mr. Stump) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office 
                           and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Commemorating June 22, 1994, as the 50th anniversary of the 
                 Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944.

Whereas on June 22, 1944, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law the 
        Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, commonly known as the GI Bill of 
        Rights of 1944;
Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 provided education and training benefits 
        to over 7,800,000 veterans;
Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 provided unemployment benefits and job 
        counseling services to assist veterans during the period between 
        discharge from military service and re-employment;
Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 is credited with contributing to the 
        robust recovery of the United States post-World War II economy;
Whereas Acts enacted subsequent to the GI Bill of Rights of 1944 have provided 
        education and training benefits to 12,500,000 veterans, making education 
        and training opportunities for those veterans obtainable and affordable;
Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944, and subsequent Acts, established home 
        loan programs for veterans which, since 1944, have guaranteed over 
        14,300,000 loans, totaling over $450,000,000,000, providing home 
        ownership opportunities to millions of veterans and their families;
Whereas the GI Bill of Rights of 1944, and subsequent Acts, have been recognized 
        by educational, business, sociocultural, and political leaders as 
        landmark pieces of legislation which have collectively contributed to 
        the development of the United States middle class; and
Whereas Congress has repeatedly expressed its support for the goals of the GI 
        Bill of Rights of 1944 through enactment of subsequent Acts: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That June 22, 1994, is hereby 
commemorated as the 50th anniversary of the Servicemen's Readjustment 
Act of 1944. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe that 
day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,886
<PP&E>                                          74,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,070
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,742
<SALES>                                         25,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,004
<CGS>                                           19,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                       374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       666
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
JAMES F. M¡nt'gNS*

Kallr I l. Toor

Lncv L. LsoNrrno

MrnrnNs, ToDD, LnoN¡.Rt, Tavlon & Aulnlcu

A Genenel PARTNERSì-IIP

30I CONGRESS AVENUE, SU A I95O

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870I

(s12) 542-9898

ru (5 l2) s42-9899

www.textaxlaw.com

AMANDA C. T¡vlon

DeNreLL¡ V. AHLRrctl

ALLEcRA D. l ltLL

Attorneys nt Law Attorneys at Law

*Board Certified in l'ax Law

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

E-M¡\lL: ataylor@textaxlaw.conr

March 12,2015

Via Electronic Filing

Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas

Attn: Jeffrey Kyle_, Clerk

Price Daniel Sr. Building

209 West l4th Street, Room 101

Austin, Texas 78701

Graphic Packagíng Corporatíon v. Combs,

Court of Appeals Number: 03-14-00197-CV

Dear Mr. Kyle

Please be advised that I will be out of town on April 15,2015 to present an

appellate CLE to the Tarrant County Business Litigation Section, and that James

Martens is scheduled for trial the week of June 15,2015 in Loyd House Aviation v.

Hegar, et. al. (Cause No. D-l-GN-14-00533). Accordingly, we respectfully

request that the Court not schedule oral argument in the above-referenced matter

on April 15 or June 17 ,2015.

Re

ACCEPTED

03-14-00197-CV

4472975

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/12/2015 11:53:33 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/12/2015 11:53:33 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/12/2015 11:53:33 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Third Court of Appeals

March 12,2075

Page2

Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do

not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

By

Amanda G. Taylor

AGT:san

Rance Craft, via electronic mail

Cynthia Morales, via electronic mail

Amy Silverstein, via electronic mail

cc:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIMOTHY BARTON, 

CARNEGIE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

WALL007, LLC,

WALL009, LLC,

WALL010, LLC,

WALL011, LLC,

WALL012, LLC,

WALL016, LLC,

WALL017, LLC,

WALL018, LLC,

WALL019, LLC,

HAOQIANG FU (a/k/a MICHAEL FU),

STEPHEN T. WALL,

Defendants,

DJD LAND PARTNERS, LLC, and

LDG001, LLC,

Relief Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-2118-X

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

INTERVENE AND STAY PROCEEDINGS

Before the Court is the Government’s Motion to Intervene and Stay 

Proceedings. [Doc. No. 44]. After careful consideration, the Court finds that the 

motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

The Court therefore ORDERS that this proceeding is stayed until otherwise 

ordered by the Court. Nothing in this Order shall preclude the Court-appointed 

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 64 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1177
2

Receiver from performing the duties and obligations, and from exercising the powers 

and rights, set forth in the Court’s Order Appointing Receiver.1 

SO ORDERED, this 16th day of November, 2022.

_____________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Doc. No. 29.

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 64 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1178
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00414-CV

____________________

IN THE ESTATE OF UDIE EDINBURGH

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-30011-P

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Ronald Ray Edinburgh filed a notice of appeal October 12, 2015. On 

October 21, 2015, we notified the appellant that the notice of appeal was defective, 

in that it fails to state the date of the judgment or order appealed from and it does 

not show that it was served on the opposing party. We also notified the appellant 

that he could file an amended notice of appeal and that if the original notice of 

appeal was filed late he could request an extension of time for late filing.

Additionally, we notified the appellant that if he wishes to proceed without 

prepayment of costs, he must file a declaration of indigence, an inmate trust 
2

account statement, and a declaration of previous filings. Finally, we warned the 

appellant that his appeal would be dismissed unless we received a written reply by 

November 6, 2015. 

The appellant failed to respond to a notice from the clerk requiring a 

response within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). We dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on December 9, 2015

Opinion Delivered December 10, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 10.2

 



 

September 17, 2015

 

Ashford Inc.

14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1100

Dallas, Texas  75254

Attn:  Independent Directors

 

Re: Clarification regarding that certain Third Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (as amended, the “Advisory Agreement”), dated June 10, 2015, among Ashford Hospitality Prime, Inc. (“Ashford Prime Inc.”), Ashford Hospitality Prime Limited Partnership (the “Prime Operating Partnership”), Ashford Prime TRS Corporation (‘TRS Corp.” and, together with Ashford Prime Inc., Prime Operating Partnership and TRS Corp., collectively “Ashford Prime” ), Ashford Inc. (“Ashford Inc.) and Ashford Hospitality Advisors LLC (“Ashford LLC” and, together with Ashford Inc., collectively, the “Advisor”)

 

Gentlemen:

 

In connection with Advisor entering into certain definitive documents for the combination of Advisor with Remington Holdings, LP (“Remington”), the independent directors of Advisor and Ashford Prime agree to the following clarification to the Advisory Agreement:

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Advisory Agreement including, without limitation, the definitions of “Adjusted EBITDA” and “Net Earnings”, the parties clarify and agree that for purposes of determining the “Termination Fee” under the Advisory Agreement, “Net Earnings” and “Adjusted EBITDA” shall not include Advisor’s Adjusted EBITDA (Advisors GAAP net income plus income taxes, depreciation, amortization and one-time expenses and other adjustments) arising under that certain Ashford Prime Hotel Master Management Agreement dated November 19, 2013, among TRS Corp., Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC, and the Landlords (as defined therein) (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Master Management Agreement”) attributable to Management Fees, Project Management Fees and Market Service Fees (all as defined in the Master Management Agreement) earned by Remington Holdings, LP and/or its subsidiaries and consolidated with the Advisor.

 

To evidence your agreement to the foregoing, please execute below.

 

14185 DALLAS PARKWAY  -  SUITE 1100  -  DALLAS, TEXAS  75254

972-490-9600  -  MAIN    972-490-9605  -  FAX

 











 

	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ASHFORD   HOSPITALITY PRIME, INC.,
    
	
 
    	
On   behalf of Ashford Prime
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Curtis B. McWilliams
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Curtis   B. McWilliams
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Lead   Director
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
AGREED:
    	
 
    
	
ASHFORD   INC.,
    	
 
    
	
On   behalf of Advisor
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Brian Wheeler
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Brian   Wheeler
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Lead   Director
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
September 17, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

KYLE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-CV-00736-P

SUSAN SHEFFIELD,

Defendant.

ORDER

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendations in this case. ECF No. 25. No objections were filed

within the fourteen-day window. The Magistrate Judge’s 

Recommendation is now ripe for review and the District Judge thus

reviews the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for 

plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other 

grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l) (extending time to file objections from ten 

to fourteen days). 

Finding no plain error or manifest injustice in the Magistrate’s 

reasoning, the undersigned District Judge ADOPTS the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 

It is therefore ORDERED that: (1) Sheffield's Motion to Dismiss 

(ECF No. 19) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon 

which relief can be granted; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion to File an 

Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23) is DENIED as futile. 

SO ORDERED on this 1st day of February 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00736-P Document 28 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 124
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 110 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 To authorize the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 
   to conduct appropriate programs and activities to acknowledge the 
status of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ``World Capital 
                of Aerobatics'', and for other purposes.



                                     


103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
 To authorize the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 
   to conduct appropriate programs and activities to acknowledge the 
status of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ``World Capital 
                of Aerobatics'', and for other purposes.

Whereas the International Aerobatic Club, which was founded on February 6, 1970, 
        held its first championships in August 1970 in the county of Fond du 
        Lac, Wisconsin;
Whereas in 1992 the International Aerobatic Club had 5,342 members throughout 
        the world, representatives of which gathered in Fond du Lac to compete 
        in the 23d Annual Aerobatic Championships during the period of August 9-
        14, 1992;
Whereas in 1992 the Experimental Aircraft Association and the Board of Directors 
        of the International Aerobatic Club named Fond du Lac as the ``World 
        Capital of Aerobatics'';
Whereas participants and spectators drawn to the aerobatic championships in Fond 
        du Lac stimulate the economic well-being of the community and provide a 
        spectator event of international significance; and
Whereas Congress declares that the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, is the 
        ``World Capital of Aerobatics'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Administrator of the 
Federal Aviation Administration may conduct appropriate programs and 
activities at the Fond du Lac County Airport to acknowledge the status 
of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ``World Capital of 
Aerobatics'', and that the airport may display signs notifying the 
public of such status.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29777]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Open Meeting of the Federal Interagency Committee on Emergency 
Medical Services (FICEMS).

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA announces the following open meeting.
    Name: Federal Interagency Committee on Emergency Medical Services 
(FICEMS).
    Date of Meeting: December 7, 2000.
    Place: Room 4236, United States Department of Transportation 
Headquarters, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Proposed Agenda: Review and submission for approval of previous 
FICEMS Committee Meeting Minutes; Ambulance Design Subcommittee and 
Technology Subcommittee Reports; presentation of member agency reports; 
reports of other Interested parties; discussion on Federal programs and 
policies regarding Public Access Defibrillation.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be open to the public with 
limited seating available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members 
of the general public who plan to attend the meeting should contact 
William Troup, United States Fire Administration, 16825 South Seton 
Avenue, Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727, (301) 447-1231, on or before 
Tuesday, December 5, 2000.
    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available upon 
request 30 days after they have been approved at the next FICEMS 
Committee Meeting on March 1, 2001. Copies of the latest approved 
FICEMS Committee Meeting Minutes are also available for viewing and 
download from the following site on the World Wide Web; http://www.usfa.fema.gov/ems/ficems.htm.

Kenneth O. Burris, Jr.,
Chief Operating Officer, United States Fire Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-29777 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-08-P