alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### POWELL v. STATE.

No. 21204.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1940.

W. T. Barber, of San Marcos, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is unlawfully carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed..

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission 'of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                                    AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                       PRO NET LINK CORP. 2000 STOCK PLAN


            WHEREAS, Pro Net Link Corp. (the "Company") adopted the 2000 Stock
Plan (the "Plan");

            WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company may at any time, and
from time to time, modify or amend the Plan, subject to shareholder approval in
certain instances; and

            WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan.

            NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

1.    In Section 4 of the Plan, the number "17,500,000" shall be substituted for
      the number "3,000,000".

2.    The following sentence shall be substituted for the last sentence of
      Section 9:

            Notwithstanding the foregoing, non-qualified Options and shares of
            Grant Stock may be transferred if the applicable Option Agreement or
            Grant Stock Agreement so provides.

3.    The following parenthetical shall be substituted for the parenthetical
      text at the end of Sections 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3:

            (or within such other period as may be specified in the applicable
            Option Agreement)

4.    The following sentence shall be added to the end of Section 10:

            A non-qualified Option granted to a consultant or advisor of the
            Company may be exercised after the termination of such relationship
            in accordance with the terms of the Option Agreement.

5.    The amendments made by Paragraphs 1 through 4 hereof shall be effective
      immediately; provided, however, that the amendment made by Paragraph 1 is
      subject to shareholder approval within one year of the adoption of this
      amendment.
# Official Journal C 104/3 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 104 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 493 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 104

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 493 May 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 104/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 104/2 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2006/C 104/3 | Summary information on State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty on State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products | 10 |
| 2006/C 104/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4207 — Campina/Fonterra Co-operative Group/JV) (
  1
  ) | 14 |
| 2006/C 104/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4062 — SKF/SNFA) (
  1
  ) | 15 |
| 2006/C 104/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4184 — Boeing/Carmen) (
  1
  ) | 16 |
| 2006/C 104/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4220 — Food Service Project/Tele Pizza) (
  1
  ) | 17 |
| 2006/C 104/8 | Notice | 18 |
| 2006/C 104/9 | COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 19 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 104/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 104/2

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (
  1
  )

1

2

2006/C 104/3

Summary information on State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty on State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products

10

2006/C 104/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4207 — Campina/Fonterra Co-operative Group/JV) (
  1
  )

1

14

2006/C 104/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4062 — SKF/SNFA) (
  1
  )

1

15

2006/C 104/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4184 — Boeing/Carmen) (
  1
  )

1

16

2006/C 104/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4220 — Food Service Project/Tele Pizza) (
  1
  )

1

17

2006/C 104/8

Notice

18

2006/C 104/9

COM documents other than legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

19

---

| | II   Preparatory Acts |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 104/10 | Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission | 21 |

II   Preparatory Acts

Commission

2006/C 104/10

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Emergency Procedures

In the event an emergency landing is necessary, Hex has an automatic or selectable “Return Home”

mode. The operator may set any point as Home in the ground station map display. Home point is 

automatically recorded before take-off, or during flight, you can switch the X2 channel between two 

positions quickly 3 to 5 times to record the current position of the Hex as the new home point. The 

home waypoint can be dragged and dropped to any position or manually input latitude/longitude. To 

prevent erroneous position input, a new home point can only be set when 6 or more GPS satellites are 

found. The UAS will fly directly to the emergency location, without hitting any intermediate waypoints.

Battery voltage is always displayed on the ground station. In addition, a yellow flashing LED appears at a 

first pre-defined low battery level, and a red flashing LED at the second level. This allows the operator to 

always monitor the battery power remaining. The Go-Home failsafe mentioned above is triggered at a 

pre-defined low battery voltage level.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0577 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-042-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Helicopters Model EC135P1, 

EC135T1, EC135P2, EC135T2, EC135P2+, EC135T2+, and MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters.

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 385 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions are intended to prevent loss of concerned control axis and 

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs: Inspecting for movement of the washers would require 1.5 work hours for a labor cost of 

$128 per helicopter and $49,280 for the U.S. fleet. Replacing the screws and related work would 

require an additional 0.5 work-hours for a labor cost of $43. Screws would cost $4 each while 

washers would cost $10 each. We estimate the cost would be $79 per repair. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Wilbanks
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as theChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 6,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham    |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                       |   | Steven C. Oldham,       |
|                       |   | President and           |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit tothe Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29431]



[[Page 69567]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 20, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 
20815.
    Contact Person: David I. Sommers, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6144, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-6470.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 1, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Mary Sue Krause, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6138, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-6470.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 8, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29431 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1058 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1058

To amend title 10, United States Code, to allow members of the Selected 
      Reserve to use educational assistance for graduate programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

Mr. Montgomery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to allow members of the Selected 
      Reserve to use educational assistance for graduate programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR GRADUATE PROGRAMS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              THE SELECTED RESERVE.

    Section 2131(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking out ``other than'' and all that follows through ``level.'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof a period.

                                 <all>
```
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 233

Designating the oak as the national arboreal emblem of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15, 1993

Mr. KLEIN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the oak as the national arboreal emblem of

the United States.

Whereas the oak has more than 300 species native to North

America;

Whereas the oak is grown today in every State;

Whereas the oak represents durability and longevity;

Whereas the fruit of the oak, the acorn, was used as food by

early Native Americans;

Whereas in a poll conducted by the International Society of

Aboriculture, the oak was selected by a majority of people

as the tree that symbolizes the United States;
2

•HJ 233 IH

Whereas the oak is renowned in art, music, and literature;

and

Whereas it is fitting and proper that the United States have

a national arboreal emblem: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the tree commonly known as the oak is designated

4 as the national arboreal emblem of the United States, and

5 the President is authorized and requested to issue a proc6 lamation announcing that the oak is the national arboreal

7 emblem.

Æ
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Oral Testimony presented at CO public hearing at Potomac Yard, Arlington, VA on 2/28/11
## Kalmi nD . Smit h

Mayo r Jo nBayles s Cit y Administrato r grand-ledge.co m Cit y o f Gran dLedg e 20 0 E.Jefferso nSt . Gran dLedg e M I 4883 7 <517 ) 627-2149: ; Februar y9 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S . Departmen t o fTransportation , 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e SE , Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-140 , Washington , D.C . 20590 . -„=Re : Su n Country-Slot.Exemptio n - Docket-Numbe rFAA-2012-0p89_ _ Ladie s an d Gentlemen : 

## " 0 V J U c7-

3 '

Su n Countr yAirline s ha s requeste d a n exemptio n fro m th e slo t limi t fo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA ) se t fort h i n § 93.123(a) , t o permi t th e FA At o creat e ai rcarrie rslot s durin g certai n limite d hour s fo rSu n Country' s use . Th e propose d ai rcarrie rslot s woul d replac e tw o slo t exemption s unde rDO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 awarde d t o Su n Country . O n Januar y6 , 2012 , th e Unite d State s Cour t o fAppeal s fo rth e Distric t o fColumbi a Circui t vacate d th e DO TOrder , an d Su n Countr y wil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC Aan d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport . Specifically , Su n Countr ydesire s on e dail yslo t durin g eac h o fth e 100 0 an d 110 0 hours . Th e propose d exemptio n woul d permi t Su n Countr yt o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi d a n inequitabl e resul t o fth e Court' s order . Th e Cit yo fGran d Ledg e i s locate d te n mile s wes t o fLansing . Man yresident s o fou rCit yar e dependen t upo n th e Lansin g airpor t fo rbusines s an d recreationa l trave l including-trave i t o Washington , D.C . usin g th e Su n Countr ydail yservice. ; Indeed , w e conside rth e Su n Countr yDC A servic e t o b e essentia l t o the,economi cgrowt h o fth e Greate rLansin g Region.includin g Gran d Ledge . Th e dail yservic e i s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t (737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reaga n Airport , i n th e stat e o fMichiga n outsid e o fDetroit . Prio rt o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit yha d requeste d th e injroduction^o fthi s servic e fro m numerou s othe rairlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , jtj s critica l tha t th e FA Atake'th e necessar ystep s t o ensure"~th e continuation"'o fth e Su n Country'slots^a t th e establishe d fligh t time s i n suppor t o fGreate rLansing' s busines s an d economi cgrovrth . You rimmediat e approval.o fthir . exemption , s o tha t Su n Countr yca n begi n t o ente rfligh t schedule s fo rsal e fo rth e balance.o f2012 , wil l b e greatl yappreciated . , • . Sincerely , , . • , . • ,. : . • ' . . ,. . . ' • • . . -

^'.. . r.;j. j i ^

^ .; ; ;; ^ f; n , r:,: > vi.:. : [ iV ; v : !,•.. : jui , h'.L^L.r : -:. n Kalmin,D.Smith,-ph.D.' . . ._ • Mayor-; ; . . . •

• ( • I . .: . \ : ! ' ' '



## Citi/dftheSt'Det

i li^iands - Estabiishe d739 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Fisher, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered October 13, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### WALKER v. STATE.

No. 22844.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1944.

Jimmie Cunningham, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of' a sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area, and, under allegations of two prior convictions, he was fined the sum of $400.

By virtue of Article 61, P.C., and allegations of two prior convictions of similar offenses, the trial court instructed the jury that they might under certain circumstances increase the penalty four times in the event of a conviction for the sale herein charged to Weldon Burney.

The complaint and information are assailed as being inadequate to support such a charge upon the part of the court, in that it is nowhere therein alleged in substance that after the commission and conviction of the oldest offense in point of time, the appellant committed the next offense in point of time, and was convicted therefor, and thereafterwards committed the third offense upon which he was then on trial/ We think the complaint and information are subject to such objection in so far as the offense set forth in the third paragraph of such pleadings is concerned. Pursuant to the three allegations in such pleadings, and the proof thereunder, the trial court submitted to the jury the proposition that in the event of their belief in appellant’s guilt as to the main offense herein charged, and their further belief as to his identity as the person charged in such two prior offenses, they could increase the punishment to four times that charged in the statute relative to a violation of the local option liquor law. In obedience thereto the jury assessed a penalty of $400, same being four times the minimum provided under the general statute as punishment for the violation of such law. In this we think the court was in error. The pleadings did not properly charge such third violation of a similar character to the main charge herein. See Mullins v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 261, 144 S.W.2d 565; Stover v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 426, 168 S.W.2d 871, and many cases therein cited. The pleadings should have alleged, among other things, that after the commission and conviction of the oldest offense, and prior to the charge in the present case, 'appellant cqmmitted the third charged offense. This it failed to do.

We think the allegations in the pleadings are sufficient to sustain an instruction relative to a double penalty but not' a quadruple one.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause-remanded.
#### In the Matter of William Capote, Appellant, v Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.), entered May 4, 1990, which dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In November 1988, petitioner was suspended from the medical staff of the respondent medical center. He claimed in a CPLR article 78 petition that the medical center failed to notify him of the specific charges against him, and failed to provide him a due process hearing. The statutory procedure by which a physician may challenge a termination of hospital privileges is a two-step process, the first of which is review of the physician’s claim by the Public Health Council, pursuant to Public Health Law § 2801-b. Only if the parties are thereafter unable to resolve their differences may the physician commence an action to enjoin the hospital from unjustifiably denying professional privileges or staff membership in violation of Public Health Law § 2801-b *(Matter of Cohoes Mem. Hosp. v Department of Health,*48 NY2d 583, 588). The petitioner’s failure to follow this procedure required dismissal of his petition as premature. Such a disposition is all the more appropriate here since we have been apprised post the argument of the appeal that petitioner has sought administrative relief. Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.