alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 14 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 3 of 14 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 4 of 14 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 5 of 14 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 6 of 14 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 7 of 14 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 8 of 14 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 9 of 14 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 10 of 14 PageID 10
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 11 of 14 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 12 of 14 PageID 12
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 13 of 14 PageID 13
Case 4:22-cv-00894-O Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 14 of 14 PageID 14
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29992]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

[HCFA-2118-CN]


Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA Programs; Continuance of the 
Approval of COLA as a CLIA Accreditation Organization; Correction

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the October 31, 2000 issue of the Federal Register (65 FR 
64966), we published a notice announcing the continued approval of COLA 
(formerly the Commission on Office Laboratory Accreditation) as an 
accreditation organization for laboratories under the Clinical 
Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) program. This document 
corrects a technical error that appeared in that document.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The notice published on October 31, 2000 (64 FR 64966) 
is effective for the period October 31, 2000 through December 31, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Val Coppola, (410) 786-3531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In FR Doc. 00-27956 of October 31, 2000 (65 FR 64966), there was 
one technical error. The error relates to our inadvertently placing an 
incorrect effective date in section II (Notice of Continued Approval of 
COLA as an Accreditation Organization) of the Federal Register 
document. That date is inconsistent with the correct effective date, as 
presented in the EFFECTIVE DATE section of the October 31, 2000 notice.

II. Correction of Error

    In FR Doc. 00-27956 of October 31, 2000 (65 FR 64966), make the 
following correction:
    On page 64966, in the third column, in the first full paragraph, 
remove ``August 31, 2002'' and in its place add ``December 31, 2002''.

    Authority: Section 353 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 263a).

    Dated: November 17, 2000.
Brian P. Burns,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 00-29992 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-M
# C_2021217EN.01002002.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 4 March 2021 — EV v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (FEDASIL)

(Case C-134/21)

(2021/C 217/31)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EV

Defendant: Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (FEDASIL)

By order of 26 March 2021, the Court (Fifth Chamber) ruled:

Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, is to be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from adopting, in relation to an applicant who has brought an appeal against a decision to transfer him to another Member State as referred to in Article 26(1) of that regulation, measures preparatory to such a transfer, such as the allocation of a place in a specific reception facility where those accommodated receive support in preparing for their transfer.

---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Andean Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending June 30,  2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Lance Larson, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



/s/ Lance Larson

By: Lance Larson

President and Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-113-Y 

 § 

DERRICK LYNELL DEVALL (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED June 2, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00113-Y Document 25 Filed 06/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54
4:22-cv-923, Notice of Appearance of Norred, for Plaintiff as Local Counsel Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

SAMUAL SIGOLOFF, et al. 

Plaintiff,

v.

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III,

Individually and in his official capacity as United States 

Secretary of Defense; 

United States Department of Defense, 

CHRISTINE WORMUTH, individually and in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the Army and, 

ANTHONY R. HALE

Individually and in his official capacity as 

Commanding General of Fort Huachuca Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

4:22-cv-923

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters his appearance on behalf of 

Samuel Sigoloff, Plaintiff herein, as local counsel. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, the undersigned 

requests copies of all notices, pleadings, and other filings in the instant case be served to the 

email address below.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Warren V. Norred

Warren V. Norred, 

Texas Bar No. 24045094

warren@norredlaw.com

515 E. Border Street; Arlington, Texas 76010

Tel. (817) 704-3984; Fax. (817) 524-6686

Local Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 4:22-cv-00923-P Document 17 Filed 12/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 217
4:22-cv-923, Notice of Appearance of Norred, for Plaintiff as Local Counsel Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - I certify that the above was served on all parties listed below 

seeking service in the instant case via the Court’s e-file system on 12/12/2022. /s/Warren V. Norred

Sean Christopher Timmons

Tully Rinckey, PLLC

441 New Karner Rd

Albany, NY 12205

832-240-3273

Fax: 832-533-8999

stimmons@tullylegal.com

PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL

Andie North Barbour

Indeed Inc

6433 Champion Grandview Way

Austin, TX 78750

202-210-1148

Email: abarbour@indeed.com

Kevin Bell

DOJ-Civ

Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice

1100 L St. NW

Washington, DC 20005

202-880-0329

Email: kevin.k.bell@usdoj.gov

DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL

Case 4:22-cv-00923-P Document 17 Filed 12/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 218
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 389 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res. 389

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  To designate the second Sunday in October of 1994 as ``National 
Children's Day''.

Whereas the people of the United States should celebrate children as 
  the most valuable asset of the Nation;
Whereas children represent the future, hope, and inspiration of the 
  United States;
Whereas the children of the United States should be allowed to feel 
  that their ideas and dreams will be respected because adults in the 
  United States take time to listen;
Whereas many children of the United States face crises of grave 
  proportions, especially as they enter adolescent years;
Whereas it is important for parents to spend time listening to their 
  children on a daily basis;
Whereas modern societal and economic demands often pull the family 
  apart;
Whereas encouragement should be given to families to set aside a 
  special time for all family members to engage together in family 
  activities;
Whereas adults in the United States should have an opportunity to 
  reminisce on their youth to recapture some of the fresh insight, 
  innocence, and dreams that they may have lost through the years;
Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the 
  United States will provide an opportunity to emphasize to children 
  the importance of developing an ability to make the choices necessary 
  to distance themselves from impropriety and to contribute to their 
  communities;
Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the 
  Nation will emphasize to the people of the United States the 
  importance of the role of the child within the family and society;
Whereas the people of the United States should emphasize to children 
  the importance of family life, education, and spiritual qualities; 
  and
Whereas children are the responsibility of all Americans, thus everyone 
  should celebrate the children of the United States, whose questions, 
  laughter, and tears are important to the existence of the United 
  States: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the secondP
Sunday in October of 1994 is designated as ``National Children's Day'', 
and the President of the United States is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00544-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.R.

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA01389

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination 

is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this 

appeal because appellant qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED November 14, 2018.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
Exhibit 34.6



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,
Inc. (the Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016



LOGO

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1118

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension of duty on certain

piston engines.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1995, the existing suspension

of duty on certain piston engines.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CER4 TAIN PISTON ENGINES.

5 (a) TEMPORARY SUSPENSION.—Heading 9902.84.07

6 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States,

7 relating to certain piston engines, is amended by striking

8 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
2

•HR 1118 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para2 graph (2), the amendment made by subsection (a)

3 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn

4 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

5 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

6 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwith7 standing section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19

8 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law to the

9 contrary, upon a proper request filed with the appro10 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the

11 date of enactment of this Act, any entry or with12 drawal from warehouse for consumption of an article

13 described in heading 9902.84.07 of the Harmonized

14 Tariff Schedule of the United States that was

15 made—

16 (A) after December 31, 1992; and

17 (B) before the 15th day after the date of

18 enactment of this Act,

19 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such

20 entry or withdrawal had been made on the date that

21 is 15 days after such date of enactment.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8050-8051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3480]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Hanford

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Hanford. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Shilo Inn, 50 Comstock, Richland, WA 99352.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Call, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Richland Operations Office, 825 Jadwin Avenue, 
P.O. Box 550, A7-75, Richland, WA, 99352; Phone: (509) 376-2048; or E-
mail: Paula_K_Call@rl.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda:
     Discussion and potential advice on Draft Tank Closure and 
Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement.
     Board Business.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The EM 
SSAB, Hanford, welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory 
committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons 
with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special 
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Paula Call at least 
seven days in advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. 
Written statements may be filed with the Board either before or after 
the meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Paula Call at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments. This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting date due to programmatic issues that had to be resolved prior 
to the meeting date.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Paula 
Call's office at

[[Page 8051]]

the address or phone number listed above. Minutes will also be 
available at the following Web site: http://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/hab.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 18, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-3480 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-15764 

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cv-00260-HLM

JUSTIN HAMMETT, 

as Administrator of the Estate of Daniel 

Hammett, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAULDING COUNTY, GEORGIA, 

CITY OF DALLAS, GEORGIA, 

NATHALIE D. WHITENER, 

in her individual capacity, 

JOEY HORSLEY, 

in his individual capacity, 

JOSEPH MAYFIELD, 

in his individual capacity, 

 Defendants - Appellees,

GARY GULLEDGE,

in his individual capacity and his 

capacity as Sheriff of Paulding County, 

Georgia, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case: 16-15764 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

Before JULIE CARNES AND BLACK, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS,* District 

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active 

service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en 

banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Petition(s) for Rehearing 

En Banc are DENIED.**

The opinion and decision in this case do not decide that physical evidence 

could never sufficiently contradict sworn, eyewitness, personal-knowledge 

testimony so as to justify a denial of summary judgment. The inferences that 

might be reasonably drawn from the pertinent physical evidence here, however, are 

insufficient to support plaintiff’s theory about the shooting incident underlying this 

case. Plaintiff’s theory projects too far past the limits of the evidence that he has 

actually presented.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

___________________________________

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

_____________

* Honorable Kathleen M. Williams, United States District Judge for the Southern 

District of Florida, sitting by designation.

** Judge Williams would grant the motion for panel rehearing.

Case: 16-15764 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the  issuer), hereby certifies as
follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of the issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2006.



/s/ Mary Jo RogersMary Jo Rogers, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to the issuer and will be retained by the issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



17