alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

DI]I,Bt]R]' GI.,I]NN I{OGERS.

Plaintil'1.

MARSHA McLANE, et al,

Delendants Civil Action No. 5:22-CV-130-C-BQ

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United

Slates Magistrate Judge (filed June 30,2023) therein advising the Court that it should: (l) strike

Plaintifls second motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38); (2) deny as futile Plaintifls

motion to amend (ECF No. 37); and (3) dismiss Plaintiff s claims with prejudice in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. $ 19ls(e)(2)(B).r

'l'he Court conducts a de not'rt review ofthose portions ofthe Magistrate Judge's report or

specificd proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely ob.jeclion is made. 28 U.S.C

$ 636(bXl )(C). Portions ofthe report or proposed findings or recommendations that are nol the

subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See United States v. llilson,864 F.2d 1219,l22l (5th Cir. 1989).

'l'hc Court has conducted an independent review ofthe Magistratc.ludge's findings and

conclusions and finds no error. It is therefbre ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and

I Plaintiff failed to timely file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation, rvhich were due within l.l days from the filing ofthe Report and Recommendation.

Case 5:22-cv-00130-C Document 42 Filed 07/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 313
Recommcndation are hcrcby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions ofthe Court. For the

reasons stated therein: (l) Plaintiff s second motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38) is

DENIEDI (2) Plaintilf s nrotion to amend (liCF No. 37) is DENIED as futilc; and (3) Plaintitl-s

claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 1915.

So ORDERED t,, 14 iuvof Ju|y.2023.

S C GS

OR TED STATE CT JUI)GE

.,./

/

r'1:

rl ???',

I

L

Case 5:22-cv-00130-C Document 42 Filed 07/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 314
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3848

___________ Leigh-Davis Glass, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Scottrade, Inc., a SIPC Insured * Brokerage Firm, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Scottrade Brokerage, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 6, 2009 Filed: December 10, 2009

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. California prisoner Leigh-Davis Glass appeals the District Court’s order denying her motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking to reopen her case, which the court dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because a partial filing fee was not paid within thirty days as ordered. Following careful re view, we conclude that the District Court abused its discretion in dec lining to reopen the case because Glass explained that she acted promptly to attempt to comply with the Court’s order and that the $3.47 payment was late for reasons beyond her control. SeeIn re Guidant Corp. Implantable-2- Defibrillators Prod. Liab. Litig. , 496 F.3d 863, 866–68 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review; factors which must be taken into account include (1) danger of prejudice to non-moving party; (2) length of delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings; (3) whether movant acted in good faith; a nd (4) reason for delay, including whether it was within movant’s reasonable control). It appears that Glass acted in good faith and that the delay was neither lengthy nor prejudicial.
In addition, we reject Glass's argumen t on appeal that the filing-fee provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA ) do not apply to her action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (addressing in forma pauperis procedur es for the "commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit, action or proceeding, civil or criminal , or appeal therein"). The filing-fee provisions of the PLRA apply to civil actions and are not limited solely to prisoner-civil-rights actions. United States v. Jones , 215 F.3d 467, 469 (4th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 532 U.S. 1053 (2001). Accordingly, Glass is not entitled to a waiver or refund of any filing fees.

We reverse the District Court’s order denying Rule 60(b) re lief, and we remand for further proceedings.

______________________________
# Official Journal C 297A/29 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 297A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4829 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 297A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4829 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 297A/1 | Publication of a vacancy for President of the Community Plant Variety Office (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10015 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 297A/1

Publication of a vacancy for President of the Community Plant Variety Office (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10015

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 75 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 75

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``National Good Teen Day''.



                                     


103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 75

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``National Good Teen Day''.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed January 16, 1992, as 
        ``Good Teen Day'';
Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in the United States 
        according to the 1990 Census;
Whereas our Nation's teenagers represent an important part of our society, and 
        the many physical and emotional changes and character-building 
        experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;
Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who have problems or 
        those who excel;
Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their intelligence, 
        abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the good which is inherent 
        in all human beings;
Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to esteem the good as 
        well as the potential that is within each of them;
Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive qualities in America's 
        youth; and
Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That January 16, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Good Teen Day,'' and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers 
of the United States and by participating in appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

t1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147272

CHANNING M. McAFEE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147272

COA: 311501 

Genesee CC: 2011-095183-NP

D&G DOLLAR ZONE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

SOFT LENS TECHNOLOGY, HEBRON

INTERNATIONAL, INC., MICHIGAN

WHOLESALE MART, L.L.C., SHEBAH, INC.,

and PRECISION OPTICAL PRODUCTS, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting 

leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on 

leave granted.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

(WY-950-1420-00-P)


Filing of Plats of Survey; Nebraska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plat of survey of the following described land is 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming, thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication.

Sixth Principal Meridian, Nebraska

T. 32 N., R. 3 E., the Survey of Tract 37, accepted November 13, 
2000

    This plat will be placed in the open files of the Wyoming State 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming, and will be available to the public as a matter of information 
only. Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $1.10 per copy.
    A person or party who wishes to protest this survey must file with 
the State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming, a 
notice of protest within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of 
this publication. If the protest notice did not include a statement of 
reasons for the protest, the protestant shall file such a statement 
with the State Director within thirty (30) calendar days after the 
notice of protest was filed.
    If protests against this survey, are received prior to the official 
filing, the filing will be stayed pending consideration of the 
protest(s) and or appeal(s). A plat will not be officially filed until 
after disposition of protest(s) and or appeal(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John P. Lee, (307) 775-6216, Bureau of 
Land Management, P.O. Box 1828, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming 82003.

    Dated: November 13, 2000.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Survey Group.
[FR Doc. 00-29976 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 411

Designating October 29, 1994, as ‘‘National Firefighters Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1994

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. WELDON, Mr. VALENTINE, and Mr. BOEHLERT)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating October 29, 1994, as ‘‘National Firefighters

Day’’.

Whereas there are over 2,000,000 firefighters in the United

States;

Whereas firefighters respond to more than 2,300,000 fires

and 8,700,000 emergencies other than fires each year;

Whereas fires annually cause nearly 6,000 deaths and

$10,000,000,000 in property damages;

Whereas firefighters have given their lives and risked injury

to preserve the lives and protect the property of others;
2

•HJ 411 IH

Whereas the contributions and sacrifices of valiant firefighters often go unreported and are inadequately recognized by the public; and

Whereas the work of firefighters deserves the attention and

gratitude of all individuals in the United States: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That October 29, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Fire4 fighters Day’’, and the President of the United States is

5 authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe the day

7 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
EXHIBIT 24











POWER OF ATTORNEY





The undersigned hereby appoints JOHN W. KAPPLES and DEAN P. FREEMAN as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power to act for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, for the purpose of signing the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GCP Applied Technologies Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  Each of such attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.





Marcia J. Avedon             /s/ Marcia J. Avedon


Ronald C. Cambre             /s/ Ronald C. Cambre


Marye Anne Fox            /s/ Marye Anne Fox


Janice K. Henry            /s/ Janice K. Henry


Phillip J. Mason            /s/ Phillip J. Mason


Elizabeth Mora            /s/ Elizabeth Mora


Danny R. Shepherd            /s/ Danny R. Shepherd


Dated: March 29, 2016
EXHIBIT 31.03 RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a)
CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gregg Buckbinder, Chief Financial and Operating Officer of Millburn
Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust
(the "Trust"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Millburn World
Resource Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and changes in trust
capital of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The Trust's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Trust and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Trust, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Trust's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Trust's most recent fiscal quarter
(the Trust's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust's
internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Trust's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Trust's
auditors and the audit committee of the Trust's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Trust's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Trust's internal control over
financial reporting.

By:


/s/ Gregg Buckbinder
--------------------------
Gregg Buckbinder
Chief Financial and Operating Officer
May 15, 2006
#### Helene Funk et al., Appellants, v Golden Hands, Inc., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Santaella, J.), entered on November 1, 1989, which denied petitioners’ motion pursuant to CPLR 7503 (b) seeking to vacate the notice of intention to arbitrate and to permanently stay arbitration on condition that respondent make R.J.G. Contracting Co., Inc. a party to the arbitration, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, the motion is denied without conditions, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners entered into a written agreement with respondent for the performance of construction and remodeling work on the petitioners’ premises located at 18 East 77th Street in Manhattan, The agreement contained a broad arbitration clause. According to the petitioners, shortly after commencing *221work respondent abandoned the project and, as a result, petitioners hired James Gerakaris, doing business as R.J.G. Contracting Co., Inc., to complete the construction work. Subsequently, respondent Golden Hands, Inc. demanded arbitration, and petitioners moved to vacate the notice and stay arbitration.

Initially, as respondent Golden Hands, Inc. concedes, the IAS court committed reversible error in conditioning the denial of the petitioners’ motion on adding R.J.G. Contracting Co., Inc., which was not a signatory to the arbitration agreement, as a party to the arbitration. A party to a written arbitration agreement may not be compelled to arbitrate disputes which arise thereunder with a nonparty. Contrary to petitioners’ assertions, however, once the parties to a broad arbitration clause have made a valid choice of forum, all questions with respect to whether the agreement to arbitrate was subsequently terminated or abandoned are for the arbitrator, not the court, to resolve *(Matter of Cassone,*63 NY2d 756).

We further find that the demand for arbitration states, with sufficient specificity, the nature of the underlying dispute and the amount sought *(Matter of Nager Elec. Co. [Weisman Constr. Corp.],*29 AD2d 939). Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News Tag:
  June 12, 2023 Operation Graduation: Joint Advanced Warfighting School Commencement NSA HAMPTON ROADS, VA —
                
                The 2023 commencement for the NDU's Norfolk, Va.-based Joint Forces Staff College (JFSC) was held on Friday, June 9th at 10:00 a.m., and broadcast via Livestream. JFSC Commandant Brigadier General
 Feb. 14, 2019 Relevancy to the Joint Force The  Institutional Research, Assessment, and Accreditation Division (IRAAD) within Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University conducted a thorough review of Geographic Combatant Command, Functional Combatant Command, and JPME-II student feedback and have published it's analysis on JFSC's "Relevancy to the Joint Force", published Sept 2017.
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# JCWS Returns To In-Person Learning

/ Published Jan. 24, 2022
NORFOLK NAVAL BASE, Virginia, 
The Joint and Combined Warfighting School returned to in-person learning after seven classes taught online. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, JCWS had to rapidly shut down in-person learning in 2020 while also converting the schedule and curriculum to facilitate online delivery, starting with class 20-3.

Class 22-01 started on 18 January at the historic JFSC building on NSA Hampton Roads to the great pleasure for faculty, staff, and students. Class 22-01 class includes representatives from all of the services (Army, Air Force, Marines, Navy, Space Force, Coast Guard), along with Interagency students, and six international students from 3 different countries.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

November 19, 2013

From the Office of the General Counsel:

Treasury is mindful of the important contributions that employees make to good government 

when making lawful disclosures of potential incidents of fraud, waste, and abuse. Treasury 

strongly supports the objectives underlying the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), as amended 

by the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act, in prohibiting retaliation against 

whistleblowers.

As a Treasury employee you have the right to make lawful disclosures, to engage in protected 

activity (such as filing a complaint), and to be free of retaliation for such actions. Supervisors and 

managers may not take, fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take a personnel action with 

respect to any employee or applicant because of:

Any disclosure of information by the employee or applicant that he or she reasonably believes 

evidences:

 * A violation of a law, rule, or regulation; 

 * Gross mismanagement;

 * Gross waste of funds;

 * Abuse of authority; or 

 * A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Finally, as a Treasury employee you may not be retaliated against for making disclosures to, 

cooperating with, participating in any investigation conducted by, or filing complaints or 

grievances with, the Office of Special Counsel, the Office of the Inspector General, and/or the 

United States Congress.

If you have any questions about your rights, please contact the OIG Whistleblower Ombudsman 

Program at 202-927-0650 or OIGCounsel@oig.treas.gov.