alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 346

Designating September 25, 1994, as ‘‘Gold Star Mothers Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1994

Mr. COYNE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating September 25, 1994, as ‘‘Gold Star Mothers

Day’’.

Whereas the services rendered to the United States by the

mothers of America have strengthened and inspired our

Nation throughout our history;

Whereas we honor ourselves and the mothers of America

when we revere and emphasize the role of the home and

the family as the true foundations of our Nation;

Whereas by doing so much for the home, the American mother is a source of moral and spiritual guidance for the

people of the United States and thus acts as a positive
2

•HJ 346 IH

force to promote good government and peace among all

mankind;

Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers assist veterans of

the Armed Forces and their dependents in the presentation of claims to the Veterans’ Administration, and aid

the men and women who served and died or were wounded or incapacitated during hostilities; and

Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers have suffered the

supreme sacrifice of motherhood by losing sons and

daughters who served in the Armed Services, and thus

perpetuate the memory of all whose lives were sacrificed

in our wars: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 25, 1994, is designated as ‘‘Gold Star

4 Mothers Day’’, and the President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people

6 of the United States to observe such day with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Northeast Indiana
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Randy J. Sizemore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Randy J. Sizemore
Name: Randy J. Sizemore
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Northeast Indiana Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by Northeast Indiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                                                             23.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RODERICKA DAVIS, §

Dall. Cnty. Jail BookIn No. 22015956, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1785-B

§

OFFICER THOMAS, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in

this case as to Plaintiff’s amended complaint. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

DATE: September 9, 2022. 

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01785-B-BN Document 22 Filed 09/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 82
Agenda – February 2015 Refunding

Treasury Dealer Meetings – January 29-30, 2015

Dealer ___________________

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, January 26, 2015 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov and NY.QTR@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury 

officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates

Central

Estimate

Range that would not 

surprise you

Low/High

January-March 2015 /

 Ending Cash Balance /

April-June 2015 /

 Ending Cash Balance /

FY 2015 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

FY 2016 Total Net Marketable Borrowing /

FY 2017 Total Net Marketable Borrowing /

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

FY 2015 /

FY 2016 /

FY 2017 /

Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2015

Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016

Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2015

Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates

3-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / /

10-year note (February) /

10-year note reopening (March/April) / / - /

30-year bond (February) /

30-year bond reopening (March/April) / /

2-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / /

5-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / /

7-year note (February/March/April) / / / / - / /

30-year TIPS (February)

10-year TIPS reopening (March)

5-year TIPS (April)

2-year FRN reopening (February/March)

2-year FRN (April)

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill size (February/March/March/April) / / / / / - / / 

Total change in bills outstanding 2/15-4/15 /

Total change in bills outstanding FY 2015 /

CMB issuance February ‘15 – April ‘15 (size/date) / / / /

Discussion Topics

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2015 and FY2016. Do you believe the 

current financing schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s financing needs though the end of FY2015? 

2. Is the composition of the regular bill issuance schedule optimal for the market environment you 

anticipate in the future? Are there any bill auction tenors in which Treasury should consider increasing 

or decreasing issuance from recent ranges and what should be the maximum and minimum issuance 

sizes for each maturity. Should Treasury consider a new bill auction maturity?

3. Break-even inflation rates have been declining since August 2014. Comment on the drivers of the 

decline in break-evens as well as the supply and demand dynamic in the TIPS market. How would you 

characterize TIPS market liquidity?
arc_ex103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3  
   
  
   
  	 
	1

	  

	 

   
  
   
  	 
	2

	  

	 

   
   
   
    	 
	3

	  

	 


   
   
  4
# C_2014390EN.01000101.xml

| 5.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 November 2014

(2014/C 390/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2514 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4429 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78190 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2623 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2055 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5775 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,788 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,08 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2248 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4198 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7866 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4342 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4286 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7014 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6144 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6143 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 348,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8300 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6538 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6635 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 160,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1659 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,270 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 54,6375 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,883 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1589 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0810 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,8422 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2514

JPY

Japanese yen

141,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4429

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78190

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2623

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2055

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5775

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,788

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,08

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2248

RON

Romanian leu

4,4198

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7866

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4342

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4286

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7014

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6144

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6143

KRW

South Korean won

1 348,77

ZAR

South African rand

13,8300

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6538

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6635

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 160,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1659

PHP

Philippine peso

56,270

RUB

Russian rouble

54,6375

THB

Thai baht

40,883

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1589

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0810

INR

Indian rupee

76,8422

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10753 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERTO DOMINGUEZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-30-ALL-H

- - - - - - - - - - February 12, 1999 Before POLITZ, GARWOOD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roberto Dominguez-Mendoza appeals his guilty plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States following his deportation. Dominguez-Mendoza argues that the district courtreversibly erred when it failed to determine whether DominguezMendoza had reviewed the presentence report (PSR) as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(A). Even if the court cannot reasonably infer that Dominguez-Mendoza had the opportunity to read and discuss the PSR with his counsel, the district court’sNo. 98-10753 -2- failure to comply with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(A) is harmless. United States v. Sustaita , 1 F.3d 950, 954 (9th Cir. 1993). Dominguez-Mendoza does not allege that he did not read the report, and he makes no claim of prejudice. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29825]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new, and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Submit comments on or before January 22, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimate is accurate, and if there are 
ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the 
collection, to Harriet Fredman, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office 
of Women Business Ownership, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street, SW., Suite 4400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harriet Fredman, Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, 202-205-6673 or Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 
(202) 205-7030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Mentoring Programs that work, Women's 
Network for Entrepreneurial Training (WNET).
    Form No's: 2031, 2031A, 2031B, 2013C, 2031D, 2031E, 2031F, 2031G.
    Description of Respondents: SBA's Women's Business Ownership 
Representatives.
    Annual Responses: 10,000.
    Annual Burden: 2,000.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether these information 
collections are necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimate is accurate, and if there are 
ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the 
collections, to Carol Fendler, System Accountant, Office of Investment 
Division, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 
6300.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Fendler, System Accountant, 202-
205-7559 or Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, (202) 205-7030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Request for information concerning 
Portfolio Financing
    Form No: 857.
    Description of Respondents: SBIC Investment Companies.
    Annual Responses: 2,160.
    Annual Burden: 2,160.
    Title: Financial Institution Confirmation Form.
    Form No: 860.
    Description of Respondents: SBIC Investment Companies
    Annual Responses: 750.
    Annual Burden: 750.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 00-29825 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

2022 NOV 21 PH 3: 27 

:JEPUTy CLE:RH_~ 

v. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-086-H-BQ-1 

JOSE ELENO MORALES 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

18 US.C. §§ 922(g)(l) and 924(a)(2) that is, Convicted Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge finds the 

following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00086-H-BQ Document 27 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 52
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed November 21, 2022. 

D. 

UNITED STA 

Case 5:22-cr-00086-H-BQ Document 27 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 53
# Official Journal L 419/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 419 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6424 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 419

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6424 November 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/2040 of the European Central Bank of 11 November 2021 amending Decision (EU) 2016/2247 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2021/52) | 1 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/2041 of the European Central Bank of 11 November 2021 amending Guideline (EU) 2016/2249 on the legal framework for accounting and financial reporting in the European System of Central Banks (ECB/2021/51) | 14 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 2/2021 of the Joint Committee established by the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova of 2 June 2021 replacing Annex III to the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova [2021/2042] | 34 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2021/2040 of the European Central Bank of 11 November 2021 amending Decision (EU) 2016/2247 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2021/52)

(ECB/2021/52)

1

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/2041 of the European Central Bank of 11 November 2021 amending Guideline (EU) 2016/2249 on the legal framework for accounting and financial reporting in the European System of Central Banks (ECB/2021/51)

(ECB/2021/51)

14

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 2/2021 of the Joint Committee established by the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova of 2 June 2021 replacing Annex III to the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova [2021/2042]

34

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 15.2







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the registration statements on Form F-3 (no. 333-227883 and no 333-229562) of our report dated April 2, 2018 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of ElectraMeccanica Vehicles Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2017 which report appears
in the December 2019 annual report on Form 20-F of ElectraMeccanica Vehicles Corp.





/s/ DMCL

Dale
Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonteLLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

March 25, 2020
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 1 4 , 2017.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00729- CV

PAMELA Y. KELLEY, CLARA BROOKS, AND GARY L. LEONARD , Appellants

V. LAVEARN IVEY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14- 07 -22640

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an attempted appeal from an order signed August 15, 2017 denying appellants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The record reflects that this is an interlocutory order.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until2

final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson , 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001). We strictly construe statutes authorizing interlocutory appeals. Young v. Villegas , 231 S.W.3d 1, 5 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, pet. denied).
On November 3, 2017 , this court notified the parties of th e court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless on or before November 20, 2017, appellants filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellants’ response includes argument related to the merits of the motion to dismiss but fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Pa nel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Busby and Wise.
Slip Op. 03 - 68

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

____________________________________

:

DREXEL CHEMICAL COMPANY, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE

:

THE UNITED STATES, : Court No. 98-02-00295-S

:

Defendant. :

____________________________________:

AMENDED JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the Consent Motion to Amend the Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)

and good cause having been shown, it is hereby;

ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Consent Motion to Amend the Judgment

Pursuant to Rule 59(e), the Consent Motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the United States pay interest to Drexel as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2644

and 19 U.S.C. § 1505.

_______________________________________

R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, JUDGE 

Dated: June 27, 2003

New York, New York
# The Challenge of the Sole Superpower in the Postmodern World Order

/ Published Feb. 14, 2019

JFSC Faculty, Dr. Keith Dickson published "The Challenge of the Sole Superpower in the Postmodern World Order" in the Marine Corps University Journal. Published: MCUJ vol. 9, no. 2, Fall 2018. (pg 117-132)

--To pursue and support its strategic goals and interests, the United States as the sole superpower will require a complete reordering of its assessment of the post–Cold War strategic environment, which is now characterized by the postmodern condition. Recognizing the basic structure of postmodern thought that dominates much of global society and affects concepts of sovereignty, power, war, and peace is essential. Some states and non-states have already employed a strategic approach that exploits the postmodern condition. Strategists and strategic leaders must now identify the contours of the postmodernist strategic environment to develop a strategic design that allows the superpower to pursue its interests and fulfill its role of order and balance by employing the very skills and precepts that the postmodernists have rejected.