alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-QSB of Andean Development
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jose Luis Yrarrazaval, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2002
                                  /s/ Jose Luis Yrarrazaval
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Jose Luis Yrarrazaval, Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Bryan Suhre

Appellate case number: 01-22-00011-CV

Trial court case number: 92053-I

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

Date motion filed: March 25, 2022

Party filing motion: Relator

It is ordered that Relator’s Motion for Rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Date: June 21, 2022
#### HARRISON v. STATE.

No. 21830.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1941.

Percy Foreman, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State,

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for negligent homicide of the second degree, punishment assessed being five months’ confinement in the county jail.

Appellant was tried before the Judge of the County Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County without a jury, and was convicted under the second count of an information and complaint which charged the act of negligence by appellant to have been driving his automobile past a school bus while same was discharging passengers, killing Agrara Vela.

The 42d Legislature, Reg.Sess., page 368, Ch. 215, Art. 301b, P.C.Vernon’s Texas Statutes, 1936, provided that when any “school bus” stops: “ * * * every operator of a motor vehicle or motorcycle approaching the same from any direction shall bring such motor vehicle or motorcycle to a full stop before proceeding in any direction; and in event such ‘School Bus’ vehicle is receiving and/or discharging passengers, the said operator of such motor vehicle or motorcycle shall not start up or attempt to pass in any direction until the said ‘School Bus’ vehicle has finished receiving and/or discharging its passengers.”

The violation of such law is denounced as a misdemeanor and punishment fixed by said statute.

The evidence shows that a school bus had stopped and several children had gotten off the bus, among them being the child who was killed. The car driven by appellant did not stop and as it was passing the bus the left front fender of the car struck and killed the little girl. The car went some 150 feet after the impact before it came to a stop. 0

The evidence supports the judgment. No bills of exception are brought forward.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 2:22-cr-00099-Z-BR Document 43 Filed 06/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 140
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

SONYA CHAPMAN, § 

 § 

Plaintiff, § 

 § 

V. § No. 3:22-cv-2188-D-BN 

 § 

ADT LLC, § 

 § 

Defendant. § 

ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION FOR FURTHER SCREENING 

Plaintiff Sonya Chapman initiated this lawsuit against Defendant ADT LLC 

by filing a pro se Motion to File Civil Claim, attaching to that motion a handwritten 

one-page complaint and a Determination and Notice of Rights issued by the U.S. 

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on September 1, 2022. See Dkt. No. 2. 

Chapman then filed a Supplemental Initial Complaint. See Dkt. No. 5. 

Senior United States District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater referred this lawsuit 

to the undersigned United States magistrate judge for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b) and a standing order of reference. 

After the undersigned recommended that the Court dismiss Chapman’s claims 

of employment discrimination in violation of federal law with prejudice and decline 

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims asserted in her 

amended complaint [Dkt. No. 13] (the FCR), Chapman objected and, in doing so, 

amended her claims, see Dkt. Nos. 18-21, and the Court re-referred this case to the 

undersigned “for further screening procedures and, if appropriate, orders for issuance 

Case 3:22-cv-02188-D-BN Document 23 Filed 07/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 329
- 2 - 

and service of process,” Dkt. No. 22. 

The undersigned therefore WITHDRAWS the FCR and will enter further 

orders as appropriate. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 13, 2023 

 _________________________________________ 

 DAVID L. HORAN 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-02188-D-BN Document 23 Filed 07/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 330
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2006/C 103/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)  Maximum annual volume for the whole aid scheme.

----
Case 4:22-cr-00035-Y Document 94 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 210
Case 3:22-cv-02069-X Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 6
Case 3:22-cv-02069-X Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 7
Case 3:22-cv-02069-X Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 8
Case 3:22-cv-02069-X Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 9
Case 3:22-cv-02069-X Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 10
Case 3:22-cv-02069-X Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 11
Case 3:22-cv-02069-X Document 1-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 12
#### O. B. HANSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22259.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 26, 1942.

N. P. Reid, of Wharton, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault, and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Since his appeal was perfected, the appellant has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 21734.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1941.

Florence, Florence & Meredith, of Gil-mer, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder without malice, and given a sentence of five years in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts found in the record, and we can not therefore appraise the major portion of the objections to the trial court’s charge. The portions of such objections that we can appraise seem to be without merit.

We notice that the provisions of the indeterminate sentence law, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. art. 775, have not been complied with herein. The sentence is therefore reformed so as to decree appellant’s confinement in the penitentiary not less than two nor more than five years, and as thus reformed the judgment is affirmed. -
Case 4:22-cv-00877-BJ Document 23 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID 4436
Case 4:22-cv-00877-BJ Document 23 Filed 11/17/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID 4437
Case 4:22-cv-00877-BJ Document 23 Filed 11/17/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID 4438
Case 4:22-cv-00877-BJ Document 23 Filed 11/17/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4439
Case 4:22-cv-00877-BJ Document 23 Filed 11/17/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID 4440
Case 4:22-cv-00877-BJ Document 23 Filed 11/17/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID 4441
Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Joint Forces Staff College

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  Coronavirus		 
-  About    -  Overview             
  -  College Leadership             
  -  College Chaplain             
  -  Contact Information             
  -  Denton Learning Center             
  -  Employment             
  -  History             
  -  Institutional Research             
  -  JFSC Faculty             
  -  Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) 
-  Academics    -  Accreditation             
  -  Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)      -  Program Description             
    -  Prerequisites             
    -  Reporting Instructions             
    -  Schedule 
  -  Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)      -  Program Description             
    -  Prerequisites             
    -  Reporting Instructions             
    -  Schedule             
    -  JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)             
    -  JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S) 
  -  Joint Information School (JIS)      -  C4I Division             
    -  Information Division 
  -  Joint Transition Course (JTC)             
  -  International Fellows      -  Incoming Fellows             
    -  Programs             
    -  Alumni             
    -  Contact Us 
  -  Senior Fellows Program 
-  Libraries		 
-  Faculty Resources		 
-  Students    -  All Course Schedules             
  -  Incoming Students             
  -  NDU Academic Policies             
  -  Security Manager/SSO             
  -  Uniform Policy 
-  Registrar		 
-  Media    -  Campaigning Journals      -  About Us             
    -  Issues & Articles             
    -  Submissions             
    -  Masthead 
  -  News             
  -  Commentary 

### Continuing Education

                        -  Combatant Commands   
                        -  Continuing Education and Academic Partnerships   

### Footer Left

National Defense University
Fort Lesley J. McNairWashington, DC 20319-5066Email: Contact NDU

                                  - Web Policy
                                  - Link Disclaimer
                                  - Privacy & Security
                                  - Recovery Act
                                  - Contacts, JFSC
                                  - FOIA
                                  - No FEAR Act
                                  - DoD No FEAR Act
                                  - Accessibility/Section 508
                                  - DoD Inspector General
                                  - Military/DoD Websites
                                  - USA.gov
                                  - Site Map

 

### JFSCFooterRight

 

 

 

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 Associate Professor Patrick Hannum’s Book Review
 Associate Professor Patrick Hannum’s book review of *Washington’s Immortals: The Untold Story of an Elite Regiment Who Changed the Course of the Revolution* by Patrick K. O’Donnell can be found at: http://allthingsliberty.com/2016/02/washingtons-immortals-the-untold-story-of-an-elite-regiment-who-changed-the-course-of-the-revolution/
 SHARE
 PRINT
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       AMERICAN ONCOLOGY RESOURCES, INC.

                 STATEMENT RE-COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                    (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three Months
                                                                          Ended March 31,
                                                            
                                                                     1998                1997
                                                              ------------------   ----------------
<S>                                                           <C>                  <C>
NET INCOME............................................              $  6,871           $  5,072
                                                                    ========           ========
                                                               
OUTSTANDING AT END OF PERIOD:                                  
     Shares of Common Stock...........................                31,531             27,531
     Commitments to issue Common Stock at specific                    17,035             17,417
      future dates....................................         
     Effect of weighting..............................                  (607)              (357)
                                                                    --------           --------
                                                               
Total Shares Used in per share calculation - basic....                47,959             44,591
                                                                    ========           ========
Net income per share - basic..........................              $   0.14           $   0.11
                                                                    ========           ========
ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:                                        
     Outstanding per above............................                47,959             44,591
     Options to purchase Common Stock                                  5,362              5,170
     Effect of weighting and treasury stock method....                (3,381)            (2,369)
                                                                    --------           --------
Total shares used in per share calculation - diluted..                49,940             47,392
                                                                    ========           ========
Net income per share -- diluted.......................              $   0.14           $   0.11
                                                                    ========           ========
</TABLE>
### The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recomm endationof the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United State s Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 95-3528

___________ Eugene Wesley, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Carolyn Steed, Circuit Clerk, * Western District of Arkansas. Nevada County, Arkansas, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 1996 Filed: March 11, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Eu gene Wesley appeals the District Court's dismissal of his 4 2 1 U.S.C. § 1 983 (1994) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d ) (1994). Having reviewed the record and Wesley's brief, we conclude th e judgment of the Distr ict Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8thCir. R. 47B. We also deny his "motion for summary judgment" file d while this appeal was pending.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6904

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DOUGLAS ALAN JARVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-91-70-N) Submitted: October 14, 2005 Decided: December 1, 2005 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas Alan Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Douglas Alan Jarvis seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion for modification of sentence, which the district court construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any di spositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jarvis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 7 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk August 7 , 2020

1 6 1 477 ( 77 )

RAYMO ND R. SMITH

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

, SC: 161 477

v COA: 3 39705

MA CC: 14

- 000003

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA,

Intervening Plaintiff,

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC

,

Defendant

- Appell ant

.

_______________________________________ ____ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the County Road Association Self

Insurance Fund to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED

. The amicus brief submitted on

July 31 , 2020 , is accepted for filing

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 53 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 53

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   prohibit bills and resolutions from containing more than a single 
           subject when they are presented to the President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Zimmer (for himself, Mr. Franks of New Jersey, Mr. Castle, and Mr. 
   Rohrabacher) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   prohibit bills and resolutions from containing more than a single 
           subject when they are presented to the President.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid for all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No bill or joint resolution containing more than a 
single subject shall be presented to the President, and the single 
subject of any bill or joint resolution shall be expressed in the title 
when its presented to the President.
    ``Section 2. The provisions of section 1 shall not apply to a bill 
or joint resolution that compiles, consolidates, revises, or rearranges 
the statutory law.''.

                                 <all>
```