alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 162A/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.162.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 162A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 541 June 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2011.162.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 162A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 541 June 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| 2011/C 162A/01 | Recruitment notice (CdR/AD 14/16a/11) — Director (m/f) of the Directorate for Horizontal Policies and Networks | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Committee of the Regions

2011/C 162A/01

Recruitment notice (CdR/AD 14/16a/11) — Director (m/f) of the Directorate for Horizontal Policies and Networks

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | (BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV) |
| 142 | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | (EN/IT/MT/SV) |
| 155 | (EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 162 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

135

140

(BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV)

142

146

147

(EN/IT/MT/SV)

155

(EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

156

157

162

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY State Small Business Credit Initiative _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PROCEDURES FOR NOTIFYING TREASURY OF A CHANGE IN THE 

AUTHORIZED STATE OFFICIAL AND DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY

Effective January 1, 2015

A Participating State must provide Treasury with written notification of a change in the 

Authorized State Official. As stated in Section 1.1 of the Allocation Agreement, the “Authorized 

State Official” is the Participating State official having oversight responsibility for the Approved 

State Program. To notify Treasury of a change in the Authorized State Official, the Participating 

State must submit the following:

• A letter signed by either the outgoing, new, or acting/interim Authorized State Official 

that includes: 1) The effective date of the change; and 2) The name, title, telephone 

number, and email address for the new or acting/interim Authorized State Official.

The notification must be submitted on the letterhead of the agency or organization that is 

responsible for the implementation of the Participating State’s Approved State Programs as 

designated in the Allocation Agreement under Section 5.1- Designation of Eligible Organization.

The Participating State may email the signed letter to SSBCIAgreements@treasury.gov rather 

than sending via first class mail or fax.

A change in the Authorized State Official that resulted from a change in the identity of the 

implementing agency or organization identified in Section 5.1 of the Allocation Agreement will 

be processed as a modification request from the Participating State. The Participating State 

must follow the guidance in the “Procedures for Requesting Modifications to the Allocation 

Agreement” to request Treasury’s approval.

A Participating State may delegate one or more officials to act on behalf of the Authorized State 

Official. To inform Treasury of delegations of authority, the Participating State must submit 

written notification on agency letterhead that is signed by the Authorized State Official or the 

chief executive of the Participating State. The notification of delegation of authority must 

include:

• The scope of the delegation including any specific signatory authority

• The name, title, telephone number, and email address for each official who has been 

delegated authority.

• The effective date of the delegation or the period the delegation is valid

The notification should also include references to any applicable laws and statutes of the 

Participating State that permits the delegation of authority.

The Participating State may email the signed delegation of authority to 

SSBCIAgreements@treasury.gov. 

Superseded by 2021 Program Documents
From: Childress, Jerry [mailto:jchildress@mcgillairclean.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:54 AM

To: Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)

Subject: RE: From McGill AirClean Web Site

Tom,

Sorry for the delay in responding. 

We do not have any data on mercury emissions from brick kilns. All of our mercury removal experience 

has been with municipal solid waste incinerators at waste-to-energy plants. I would have to look 

through some test data to see how the levels compared with those in your study. In the past, when I 

have had questions regarding removal efficiencies and parameters controlling those efficiencies, I have 

contacted Norit, a PAC supplier, for assistance. That might be a good source of information for you 

regarding this.

It should not be very difficult or expensive to add a PAC injection system to an existing brick APC system 

that is already using a dry sorbent injection system for acid gas control. A simple bag dump system with 

a blower could probably be used and would require very little additional space at a site. Weather 

protection would be necessary, however. The slight increase in baghouse inlet particulate loading 

shouldn't adversely affect the baghouse performance either.

Hope this helps some.

Gerald J. Childress, National Sales Manager McGill AirClean LLC

1777 Refugee Road

Columbus, Ohio 43207-2119

614/829-1350, Cell: 614/937-1816

Fax: 614/445-8759

-----Original Message-----

From: Tom Holloway [mailto:tcholloway@rti.org]

Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:52 AM

To: sales@mcgillairclean.com

Cc: UMC Marketing Services

Subject: From McGill AirClean Web Site

SUBJECT: Control of mercury at brick plants SENT BY: Tom Holloway, E-MAIL: tcholloway@rti.org

Tom Holloway sends the following message:
Hi, I work for RTI International, and we are providing technical support to the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency to develop new regulations for the brick manufacturing industry. I have a couple of 

questions I was hoping you could help me answer:

(1) Is it feasible to add activated carbon injection to an existing dry lime injection system for the purpose 

of controlling mercury emissions?

(2) Is it feasible to control mercury emissions from brick kilns, given the following parameters?

- Range of mercury concentrations from 0.5 to 29 micrograms per dry standard cubic meter (average of 

8 ug/dscm)

- Range of air flows from 15,200 to 108,500 actual cubic feet per minute (average of 38,200 acfm) and 

9,400 to 62,700 dry standard cubic feet per minute (average of 23,600 dscfm)

- Range of temperatures from 114 to 400 degrees Fahrenheit (average of 321 degrees F)

Any assistance you can provide would be helpful. Thanks.

Tom Holloway

RTI International

Research Triangle Park, NC

Phone: 919-316-3733

Email: tcholloway@rti.org
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6413** 

TRAVIS J. WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN MCFADEN , Respondent

– Appellee , and
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 4:13

- cv - 00005

- RMG )

Submitted : August 21 , 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Travis J. Williams , Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM: Travis J. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge , as modified, and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit just ice or judge issues a cert ificate of appealability. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the dist rict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 67

To designate the visitors center at the Channel Islands National Park,

California, as the ‘‘Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitors Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. GALLEGLY (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. WOLF, Ms. NORTON, Mr. DELAY, Mr. BEREUTER, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. MCDADE, Mr.

DORNAN, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. CUNNINGHAM,

Mr. COX, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. THOMAS of California, Mr. SMITH of Oregon,

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. BEILENSON, Mr. DREIER, Mr. HERGER, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. MCKEON, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. VUCANOVICH, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA,

Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. MINETA, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. ROYCE,

Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. BACCHUS of Florida, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. POMBO, Mr. KIM, Mr. MCCANDLESS, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. MICHEL, Mr.

HORN, and Mr. HYDE) introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the visitors center at the Channel Islands National Park, California, as the ‘‘Robert J. Lagomarsino

Visitors Center’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HJ 67 IH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The visitors center at the Channel Islands National

3 Park, California, is designated as the ‘‘Robert J. Lago4 marsino Visitors Center’’.

5 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

7 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

8 visitors center referred to in section 1 is deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘Robert J. Lagomarsino Visitors

10 Center’’.

Æ
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 16, 2016 

CONTACT: Rob Friedlander, Treasury Public Affairs (202) 622-2960 

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 16

WASHINGTON – Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. Lew today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive and open sessions at the Treasury 

Department. 

During the executive session, the Council received a presentation from the Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (CFTC) on its recent stress tests of central counterparties.

The Council also discussed the ongoing annual reevaluation of its designation of a nonbank 

financial company, including the review of materials submitted by the company, discussions 

with the company, and consultations with relevant state and federal regulatory agencies.

The Council also reviewed and discussed certain confidential and supervisory information 

related to its ongoing assessment of potential risks to U.S. financial stability from asset 

management products and activities, in advance of the presentation during the open session.

During the open session, the Council received an update from the Federal Reserve on the work 

of the Alternative Reference Rates Committee. The Council has previously recommended 

improving governance of existing benchmarks such as LIBOR and a transition towards new 

benchmarks in each of its annual reports.

The Council also received an update from the Council's hedge fund working group, following the 

Council’s public update on this topic in April. Staff provided an update that included an analysis 

of potential financial stability risks related to the use of leverage by large hedge funds. Staff also 

presented proposals to address current data gaps and to continue monitoring for potential risks.

The Council also received a presentation on and voted to revise the Council’s FOIA regulations 

to comply with the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016.
 

Finally, the Council voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on September 22.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved meeting 

minutes are available at http://www.fsoc.gov. 

###
QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: 9101/2007

Revision

Record of Contacts

DMS Docket No. FAA-200

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e,g., A1'A, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization PersOIl Contacted Date

ATA Joe White 03/3012009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 369/2005

of 3 March 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 25 February to 3 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

(3)OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6084** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BRUCE EDWARD WOODS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg
. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. ( 5:03

- cr - 30054

- NKM

- RSB

- 2 ; 5:12

- cv - 80401

- NKM

RSB )

Submitted : May 30, 2013 Decided: June 4, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Bruce Edward Woods , Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bruce Edward Woods seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating t hat reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wood s has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00810

- CV

Scott HARRISON

, Appellant

v.

Barbara CHRISTMAN , Boerne Housing Authority, and Michael Lloyd, Appellees

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23

- 079

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE WATKINS

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. App ellees’ October 2 0, 2023 Motion for Dismissal Due to Want of Prosecution and January 4, 2024 Supplement to Appellants’ Motion for Dismissal Due to Want of Prosecution are DENIED AS MOOT. We ORDER that no costs be assessed against appellant in

relation to t his appeal because he is indigent.

SIGNED January 24 , 2024.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JEFFREY SOLOMON K. CHIJIOKE-UCHE,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 

Defendant

AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., dba 

GM Financial,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2024-1254

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:19-cv-04006-

GJP, Judge Gerald J. Pappert.

-------------------------------------------------

JEFFREY SOLOMON K. CHIJIOKE-UCHE,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GENERAL MOTORS, aka GM Buick,

Defendant

Case: 24-1254 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2024
2 CHIJIOKE-UCHE v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC

GENERAL MOTORS LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2024-1255

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:20-cv-00216-

GJP, Judge Gerald J. Pappert.

______________________

Before CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

In response to the court’s January 18, 2024 show cause 

order, Jeffrey Solomon K. Chijioke-Uche urges this court to 

retain jurisdiction over these appeals. Appellees have not 

responded. 

Dr. Chijioke-Uche filed the underlying complaints in 

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania asserting claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty 

Act (“MMWA”). He now appeals from the district court’s

orders granting in part the defendants’ motions to strike 

his proposed narrative testimony and trial exhibits.

Contrary to Dr. Chijioke-Uche’s assertion, these appeals fall outside the limited authority that Congress 

granted this court to review decisions of federal district 

courts: cases arising under the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district court 

from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, see

§ 1295(a)(4)(C); and cases involving certain damages 

claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in 

Case: 24-1254 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 04/15/2024
CHIJIOKE-UCHE v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC 3

amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2); 

28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(1). 

Instead, any appeal in these matters would belong in 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We deem it the better course to transfer to that court, where Dr. Chijioke-Uche may raise, 

among other things, his arguments regarding 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292. 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

This matter and all its filings are transferred to the 

United States Court of Appeals for Third Circuit pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

April 15, 2024 

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 

 

Case: 24-1254 Document: 13 Page: 3 Filed: 04/15/2024
#### Bert FELTNER, movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 6, 1953.

S. M. Ward and W. M. Melton, Hazard, for movant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Walter Herdman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

A motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court upon a conviction for keeping a disorderly house, with punishment assessed at a fine of $200 and ninety days in jail.

This case is distinguishable from the Case of Baker v. Commonwealth, Ky., 252 S.W.2d 53, because the evidence supports the instructions given here.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
CWA Section 401 Certification