alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November                  8, 2007 | /s/  Laurence                  P. Birch                                                                                                                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                | Laurence                  P. Birch                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                                | President                  and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Acting                  Chief                  Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  |

----
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 287

To designate both the month of August 1994 and the month of August

1995 as ‘‘National Slovak American Heritage Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1993

Mr. HOLDEN (for himself and Mr. GEKAS) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate both the month of August 1994 and the month

of August 1995 as ‘‘National Slovak American Heritage

Month’’.

Whereas Stefan Parmenius Stitnicky, a Slovak chronologist

and author of the poem ‘‘De Navigatione’’, came to the

New World as a member of Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s expedition in 1583;

Whereas Jan Boda, Stefan Mada, and other Slovaks were

among the first settlers of Jamestown, Virginia in 1609;

Whereas Slovak immigrants came to North America in great

numbers seeking religious, economic, and political free-
2

•HJ 287 IH

dom and, since the birth of this Nation, have labored diligently for the betterment of America;

Whereas the history of the Slovak people in the United States

reflects a hard-working and honorable presence for over

200 years and includes service in all of the Nation’s

wars, including the American Revolution;

Whereas Slovak-Americans, who comprise the second largest

Slav ethnic group in America, have distinguished themselves by contributing to the development of the sciences,

arts, literature, government, military service, athletics,

and education in the United States; and

Whereas in 1993 and 1994, Slovak-Americans celebrate the

independence of Slovakia and the centennials of Slovak

churches, newspapers, and fraternal organizations in the

United States and, in doing so, proudly proclaim their

pride in being Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the months of August 1994 and August 1995 are

4 each designated as ‘‘National Slovak American Heritage

5 Month’’. The President is authorized and requested to

6 issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

7 States to observe these months with appropriate cere8 monies and activities.

Æ
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 330

Designating May 1994 as ‘‘National Community Residential Care Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1994

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating May 1994 as ‘‘National Community Residential

Care Month’’.

Whereas the need for quality, dependable health care for the

elderly, disabled, and mentally ill increases each year;

Whereas community residential care fulfills medical, social,

and nutritional assistance to those in need and who cannot care for themselves;

Whereas the community residential care industry is both national and international, and it is deserving of recognition

and appreciation;

Whereas the community residential care industry is staffed

by committed, hardworking professionals who dedicate
2

•HJ 330 IH

their working lives to the care of the elderly, the disabled,

and the mentally ill;

Whereas those providing community residential care must

meet stringent licensing requirements; and

Whereas the community residential care industry provides a

uniquely workable and homelike environment for those

unable to care for themselves at home in a manner which

promotes confidence, support, and self-esteem: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 1994 is designated as ‘‘National Community

4 Residential Care Month’’. The President is authorized and

5 requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe such month with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6780

JIMMY LEE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. KEVIN ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-210-5-F(3))

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lee Williams appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Williams v. Anderson, No. CA-98-210-5-F(3) (E.D.N.C. Mar. 17,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 62

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to a Federal balanced

budget.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. POSHARD introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to a

Federal balanced budget.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States
2

HJ 62 IH

1 within seven years after its submission to the States for

2 ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays of the United States for

5 any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts of the United

6 States for that year, unless three-fifths of the whole num7 ber of both Houses of Congress shall provide for a specific

8 excess of outlays over receipts.

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

10 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

11 United States Government for that fiscal year in which

12 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may waive the provisions

14 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

15 of war is in effect.

16 ‘‘SECTION 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts

17 of the United States except those derived from borrowing

18 or retirement trust funds. Total outlays shall include all

19 outlays of the United States except for those for retire20 ment trust funds or repayment of debt principal.

21 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall take effect beginning

22 with fiscal year 1995 or with the second fiscal year begin23 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00036-CR

JUSTIN RAY ROMO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-1121-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Justin Ray Romo pleaded guilty to the offense of evading arrest or 

detention using a vehicle and pleaded true to an enhancement allegation. A jury 

thereafter assessed his punishment at four years’ imprisonment. In his sole issue, Romo 

contends that the judgment incorrectly recites that he was convicted of a second-degree 

felony. The State concedes the error.

The offense of evading arrest or detention using a vehicle is a third-degree 

felony. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2014). The 
Romo v. State Page 2

enhancement allegation does not change this. It merely enhances the punishment range 

of the offense to that of a second-degree felony without changing the felony degree of 

the offense itself. See id. § 12.42(a), (f) (West Supp. 2014); Martin v. State, 405 S.W.3d 944, 

949-50 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2013, no pet.).

Accordingly, we sustain Romo’s sole issue and modify the judgment to reflect 

conviction of a third-degree felony. We affirm the judgment as modified.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Affirmed as modified

Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2014

Do not publish

[CR25]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1772

ESTHER FOSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RENFRO CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-1193

ESTHER FOSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RENFRO CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge;

Bruce H. Hendricks, Magistrate Judge. (7:07-cv-00124-HFF)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Esther Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Cara Yates Crotty, CONSTANGY,

BROOKS & SMITH, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Esther Foster appeals the

district court’s denial of her motions to remand and to appoint

counsel and the court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Foster v. Renfro Corp., No. 7:07-cv-00124-HFF

(D.S.C. May 2, 2007; Jan. 29, 2008). We deny Foster’s motion to

appoint counsel and deny as moot Renfro Corporation’s motion to

dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Large Business Application For Treasury OSDBU’s Business Partnership Network

*Note:* A large or mature small business will need to complete an application before acceptance into the Business Partnership Network Program

Large Firm or Mature Small Business Information. *Provide the following*: 

· Name of Firm

· Address 

· Website and Email address 

· DUNS 

· Contact Name and Position Title 

· Telephone 

· NAICS codes

· Type of business and services offered

· Does the large business have ownership in any part of the small firm? 

· Provide an overview or a brief explanation on how you will provide resources or support to help improve the small business.

Small Firm Information. *Provide the following*: 

· Name of Firm

· Address 

· Website/Email address

· DUNS 

· Contact Name/Position Title 

· NAICS codes

· Type of business and services provided

If your firm have not selected a small firm, Treasury will review its list of small businesses and recommend a good match for your business.

Large Business Partnership Program Manager 

Signature: __________________________ Date:_________

Small Business Partnership Program Manager 

Signature: _________________________  Date:_________
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 415

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning October 16, 1994, as

‘‘National Penny Charity Week’’.

Whereas 170 billion pennies—$1.7 billion—are circulating in

the economy;

Whereas financial institutions, merchants, and retail establishments are reporting a shortage of pennies;

Whereas this shortage is a result of American people hoarding their pennies;
2

•HJ 415 RDS

Whereas, during fiscal year 1994, the United States Mint will

spend $1.64 million produce 13.3 billion pennies in order

to counter the effect of hoarding;

Whereas donating hoarded pennies to charities provides the

charities with funds, diminishes the shortage of pennies,

lowers the demand on the United States Mint to produce

additional pennies, and ultimately saves the United

States Treasury money;

Whereas Penny Lover’s of America is a not-for-profit charitable organization that seeks to promote character, scholarship, and patriotism among America’s youth by collecting penny donations to finance their educational pursuits;

Whereas Penny Lover’s of America is celebrating its 10th anniversary this year by conducting a penny recycling campaign; and

Whereas ‘‘National Penny Charity Week’’ coincides with

Penny Lover’s of America’s ‘‘National Penny Campaign

Recycling Project’’ both of which will assist in alleviating

the penny shortage and raise funds for charitable and

community causes: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President is authorized and requested to issue

4 a proclamation designating the week of October 16, 1994,

5 as ‘‘National Penny Charity Week’’ and to call on the peo6 ple of the United States to observe such week with appro7 priate ceremonies and activities, including the donation of

8 pennies to charities, particularly to those which provide
3

•HJ 415 RDS

1 direct services to the nation’s underprivileged and dis2 advantaged population, and to worthy community causes.

Passed the House of Representatives September 30,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MYRA BROWN and ALEXANDER 

TAYLOR,

Plaintiffs,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and 

MIGUEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as 

Secretary of Education, 

Defendants. 

 Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00908-P 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL

Defendants respectfully move for a stay of this Court’s November 10, 2022 Order (ECF No. 

37) and Final Judgment (ECF No. 38) pending the disposition of Defendants’ appeal. See Brown v. 

U.S. Dep’t of Education, No. 22-11115 (5th Cir.). The reasons for this motion are set forth in 

Defendants’ Brief in Support of Their Motion to Stay Judgment Pending Appeal, which is being filed 

concurrently with this motion. As explained in that brief, Defendants respectfully request that the 

Court rule on this motion no later than November 17, 2022, at 12:00 PM Central Time. If the Court 

does not grant relief by that time, Defendants will seek relief from the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit. A proposed order is attached. 

Dated: November 15, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

BRIAN D. NETTER 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General

MARCIA BERMAN

Assistant Branch Director

/s/ Cody T. Knapp 

CODY T. KNAPP (NY #5715438)

Case 4:22-cv-00908-P Document 40 Filed 11/15/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 595
2

KATE TALMOR

R. CHARLIE MERRITT

SAMUEL REBO

Trial Attorneys

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division

Federal Programs Branch

1100 L St. NW

Washington, D.C. 20005

Telephone: (202) 532-5663

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

E-mail: cody.t.knapp@usdoj.gov

Counsel for Defendants

Case 4:22-cv-00908-P Document 40 Filed 11/15/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 596
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 15, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically serve a copy to all counsel of record.

/s/ Cody T. Knapp 

CODY T. KNAPP

Case 4:22-cv-00908-P Document 40 Filed 11/15/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 597
4 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Before filing this motion, on November 15, 2022, counsel for Defendants conferred with 

counsel for Plaintiffs, who reported that Plaintiffs oppose the motion on the ground that “Defendants 

cannot satisfy the requirements for a motion to stay the judgment pending appeal.” For all the reasons 

given in Defendants’ Brief in Support of Motion to Stay Judgment Pending Appeal, Defendants 

disagree.

/s/ Cody T. Knapp

CODY T. KNAPP

Case 4:22-cv-00908-P Document 40 Filed 11/15/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 598
#### RIDER v. RIDER.

No. 14099.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

June 7, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1940.

W. L. Coley, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Rollins T. Harris, of Monahans, for appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant brought an action for a divorce decree against his wife and she answered and filed a cross-action for a like decree.

On a trial before the district court, without the intervention of a jury, a decree was entered denying appellant a decree and giving appellee a decree on her cross-petition, and the trial court awarded the care and -custody of the three minor children born to the union to the mother, the appel-lee, gave the father the privilege of having the children visit him during the Christmas holidays for six days and during the Summer vacation for four weeks, and ordering the father to pay for the support of his children the sum of eight dollars weekly.

From this decree the father appeals and urges us to reverse the decree of the trial court.

The most unpleasant tasks that confront our district courts, in civil actions, are those of passing upon suits for dissolution of the marriage contracts that have been entered into, and awarding the care and custody of children who have been born to the contending parents. .

Under our system, a liberal discretion is vested in the judges of the district *223courts, when these tasks must be performed. We think this is well because they see the parties and witnesses face to face and eye to eye, and they are better enabled to thus analyze the facts and weigh the virtues of the parties and determine what, under all of the facts, seems best for the children.

No Q. and A. statement of- facts was brought to us,, and we have examined the agreed statement, and we find nothing therein to authorize our court to render a judgment holding that the district court has abused the discretion vested in him.

All assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed. Hickman v. Hickman, Tex.Civ.App., 20 S.W.2d 1073; Article 4639, Revised Civil Statutes.

Affirmed.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 399

Designating August 29, 1994, as ‘‘National Sarcoidosis Awareness Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 8, 1994

Mr. BISHOP introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating August 29, 1994, as ‘‘National Sarcoidosis

Awareness Day’’.

Whereas sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown causes

that can affect any part of the body;

Whereas sarcoidosis affects between 20 and 50 individuals in

the United States in 100,000;

Whereas most victims of the disease range in age between 20

and 40 years, with blacks being affected at least 10 times

more often than other ethnic groups in the United

States;

Whereas between 10 to 20 percent of individuals stricken

with sarcoidosis eventually develop serious disabling con-
2

•HJ 399 IH

ditions caused by damage to vital organs, such as lungs,

heart, and central nervous system;

Whereas sarcoidosis is an enigma in the realm of medicine

and the disease requires extensive and ongoing study and

research in an effort to develop an effective treatment

and eventually a cure;

Whereas individuals with sarcoidosis and family members

across the United States are seeking treatment and support services to assist in controlling the effects of the disease;

Whereas grassroots support groups and nonprofit organizations are forming across the United States to encourage

public awareness of the mysterious and debilitating disease;

Whereas the Federal Government has a responsibility to lead

a nationwide effort to find a cure for the disabling disease; and

Whereas the Federal Government should make research into

the causes of the life threatening ailment a greater priority and provide the public with more information about

potential treatments for individuals with sarcoidosis:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That August 29, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Sar4 coidosis Awareness Day’’, and the President is authorized

5 and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people
3

•HJ 399 IH

1 of the United States to observe this day with appropriate

2 ceremonies and activities.

Æ