alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Scheduling Order Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARTIN J WALSH,

Plaintiff.

v.

ROBERT PETERSON et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-01869-E

ORDER

On April 4, 2023, the Parties submitted their Joint Status Report in this case. (ECF No. 74). 

The Joint Status Report discusses a related case before this Court—Coleman, et al., v. Brozen, et 

al., Case No. 3:20-cv-01358-E (N.D. Tex.)—and potential rulings regarding motions that are 

pending in the Coleman case, which may influence “meaningful settlement discussions” in this 

instant proceeding. In particular, the Joint Status Report states:

It is Defendants’ position that this matter cannot be resolved until the Court rules 

on the motion to compel arbitration in the Coleman matter.

Plaintiff’s position is that the instant case should proceed without regard to the 

Coleman case given that the cases are in different phases of litigation and that the 

instant case cannot be subject to arbitration regardless of the outcome of any 

motions pending in the Coleman case. Plaintiff further asserts that to the extent 

Defendants believe any remedy ultimately granted in the instant case impacts the 

Coleman case, Defendants could raise that in the Coleman litigation without the 

cases being litigated in tandem and without the instant case being delayed.

(ECF No. 74 at 10). The motion to compel arbitration is before the Court in Coleman.

Weighing the competing interests of the Parties and the Court, the Court concludes in its 

discretion that this action should be STAYED pending its ruling on the motion to compel 

Case 3:22-cv-01869-E Document 78 Filed 05/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 862
Scheduling Order Page 2 of 2

arbitration in the Coleman matter. Thus, the Court STAYS all proceedings this case—pending 

rulings on the motion to compel arbitration in the Coleman matter.1 The Parties shall not file into 

this case except upon leave of Court.

The Clerk shall transmit to the Parties a true copy of this Order.

SO ORDERED.

Signed May 23rd, 2023.

Ada Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Coleman, et al., v. Brozen, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-01358-E, ECF No. 66 (N.D. Tex.).

Case 3:22-cv-01869-E Document 78 Filed 05/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 863
# Official Journal C 441A/7 De

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 441A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 617 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 441A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 617 December 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Union Intellectual Property Office |
| 2018/C 441 A/01 | Vacancy notice — VEXT/18/351/AD 14 — Deputy Executive Director | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Union Intellectual Property Office

2018/C 441 A/01

Vacancy notice — VEXT/18/351/AD 14 — Deputy Executive Director

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2016221EN.01000201.xml

| 18.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 June 2016

(2016/C 221/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1254 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78770 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3815 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0818 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4310 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,069 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,26 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4463 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5355 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2988 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5234 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4519 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7338 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5959 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5187 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 318,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1218 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4171 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 996,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6153 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,258 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,2867 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,704 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8942 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2471 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,4975 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1254

JPY

Japanese yen

117,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78770

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3815

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0818

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4310

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,069

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,26

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4463

RON

Romanian leu

4,5355

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2988

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5234

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4519

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7338

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5959

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5187

KRW

South Korean won

1 318,22

ZAR

South African rand

17,1218

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4171

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 996,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6153

PHP

Philippine peso

52,258

RUB

Russian rouble

73,2867

THB

Thai baht

39,704

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8942

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2471

INR

Indian rupee

75,4975

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS HERNANDEZ-ANDRADE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70452

Agency No. A095-663-103

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Hernandez-Andrade, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

MAR 10 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70452

§ 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382

F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004), and review for abuse of discretion the denial of a

continuance, Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per

curiam). We deny the petition for review.

Contrary to Hernandez-Andrade’s contention, his conviction under

California Penal Code § 273.5(a) is categorically a crime of domestic violence

under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i). See Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1080,

1083-1086 (9th Cir. 2010). 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance where

Hernandez-Andrade did not demonstrate good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (IJ

may grant motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Baires v. INS, 856

F.2d 89, 92-93 (9th Cir. 1988). It follows that Hernandez-Andrade’s due process

challenge fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring

error to prevail on a due process claim). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the issuer), hereby certifies as
follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2007.



| |  |  |  |                                          
| |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ Mary Jo Rogers                       
| |  |  |  | Mary Jo Rogers, Senior Vice President and
| |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the issuer and will be retained by the issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128865 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128865 

 COA: 259604 

Wayne CC: 03-012048

RAYMOND EDWARD TUCKER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 13, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7085

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

FREDERICK LYNN SELLERS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (4:01-cr-00058-CWH-1) 

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Frederick Lynn Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Frederick Lynn Sellers appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Sellers, No. 

4:01-cr-00058-CWH-1 (D.S.C. July 6, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1143

To exclude foreign reparation payments from consideration as income in

determining eligibility and benefits under Federal housing assistance

programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1993

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To exclude foreign reparation payments from consideration

as income in determining eligibility and benefits under

Federal housing assistance programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding any other provision of law, repara4 tion payments received from any foreign government shall

5 not be considered as income or a resource for the purpose

6 of determining the eligibility of, or the amount of benefits

7 payable for, any person under the United States Housing

8 Act of 1937, section 236 of the National Housing Act,

9 section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act
2

•HR 1143 IH

1 of 1965, section 202(h)(4) of the Housing Act of 1959

2 (as in effect before October 1, 1991), section 811 of the

3 Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, or

4 title V of the Housing Act of 1949.

Æ
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR) 

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD) 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL 

AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: 

Small Electric Motors 

November 24, 2009
 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliance and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 19
 

 

This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy
 

by staff members of
 

Navigant Consulting, Inc., 

and 

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 19
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 5

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit

the terms of office of the judges of the Supreme and inferior courts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. APPLEGATE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to limit the terms of office of the judges of the

Supreme and inferior courts.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, to be valid only if ratified

6 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

7 within seven years from the date of the submission of this

8 joint resolution by the Congress for ratification:
2

HJ 5 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. (a) Subject to the limitations of sub3 section (b), each judge of the Supreme Court or of any

4 inferior court shall be appointed to serve during good be5 havior for a term of six years.

6 ‘‘(b) No individual may serve for a total of more than

7 twelve years as a judge of the Supreme Court, for a total

8 of more than twelve years as a judge of any inferior court,

9 or for a combined total of more than twelve years as a

10 judge of any two or more inferior courts.

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall not apply with respect

12 to any judge of the Supreme Court or any inferior court

13 who holds office by reason of appointment to such office

14 before the ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: May 4, 2005 By:  /s/ Philip A. Grybas    Philip A. Grybas,    Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

 

 

I, Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the "Company"), hereby certify, with respect to the Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2015 , (the "Agreement"), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as servicer and special servicer, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the "Certificate Administrator"), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:

 

1. A review of the Company's activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned's individual capacity.

 

Date: February 26, 2016

 

 

Citibank N.A.

By: /s/ Karen Montbach

Name: Karen Montbach 

Title: Managing Director

 

CGCMT 2015-SMRT
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1101

To prohibit the award of costs (including attorney’s fees) against a judicial

officer for acts or omissions occurring in a judicial capacity.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. HUGHES (for himself and Mr. MOORHEAD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the award of costs (including attorney’s fees)

against a judicial officer for acts or omissions occurring

in a judicial capacity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes of the United

4 States (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting before

5 the period at the end the following: ‘‘, except that costs,

6 including attorney’s fees, shall not be awarded against a

7 judge or judicial officer who would be immune from ac8 tions for damages arising out of the same act or omission

9 about which the complaint is made in the action or pro10 ceeding’’.
2

•HR 1101 IH

Æ
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
August 7, 2008
 By:
                /s/
      Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
      C. ShieldsExecutive
      Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
 
  This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
by reference.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00097-Z-BR

§

DENA GONZALES (3) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

DENA GONZALES (3), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 4 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining DENA GONZALES (3) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that DENA GONZALES (3) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) -

CONVICTED FELON IN POSSESSION OF A FIREARM and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found

guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: January 9, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00097-Z-BR Document 74 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 195