18822 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Dated: March 28, 2014. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.132, in the table in 

paragraph (a), in the entry for ‘‘Banana’’, 

revise the Expiration/revocation date, 

‘‘3/31/14’’ to read ‘‘3/31/15’’ to read as 

follows: 

§ 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues. 

(a) * * * 

Commodity 

Parts 

per 

million 

Expiration/ 

revocation 

date 

*****

Banana 1 ............... * * * 3/31/15 

*****

1 No U.S. registrations as of September 23, 

2009. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–07556 Filed 4–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 799 

[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0209; FRL–9907–36] 

Final Enforceable Consent Agreement 

and Testing Consent Order for 

Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4); 

Export Notification 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; enforceable consent 

agreement and testing consent order. 

SUMMARY: Under the Toxic Substances 

Control Act (TSCA), EPA has issued a 

testing consent order (Order) that 

incorporates an enforceable consent 

agreement (ECA) with Dow Corning 

Corporation, Evonik Corporation, 

Momentive Performance Materials USA 

Inc., Shin-Etsu Silicones of America, 

Inc., and Wacker Chemical Corporation 

(the Companies). The Companies have 

agreed to certain environmental testing 

that will be used by EPA to characterize 

sources and pathways of release of 

octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) to the 

environment and resulting exposures of 

aquatic and sediment dwelling 

organisms to D4, contributing to the 

Agency’s efforts to understand potential 

environmental effects of D4. This 

document revises the listing for D4 in 

the table of testing consent orders for 

substances and mixtures with Chemical 

Abstract Service (CAS) Registry 

Numbers. This document announces the 

ECA and the Order that incorporates the 

ECA for this testing, and summarizes 

the terms of the ECA. As a result of this 

action, exporters of D4, CAS No. 556– 

67–2, including persons who do not 

sign the ECA, are subject to TSCA 

export notification requirements. 

DATES: The effective date of the ECA, 

the Order that incorporates the ECA, 

and this action is April 4, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0209, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pollution Prevention 

and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPPT 

Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information on the ECA, contact: Mark 

Seltzer, Chemical Control Division 

(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention 

and Toxics, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (202) 564–2901; email address: 

seltzer.mark@epa.gov. 

For general information contact: The 

TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 

South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 

14620; telephone number: (202) 554– 

1404; email address: TSCAHotline@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general. The requirements in the ECA 

and the Order that incorporates the ECA 

only apply to those companies that are 

specifically named in the ECA. As of 

April 4, 2014 any person who exports or 

intends to export any chemical that is 

the subject of the ECA and the Order 

that incorporates the ECA is subject to 

the export notification requirements of 

TSCA section 12(b) (see 40 CFR part 

707, subpart D, and Unit IV.B.). 

Although other types of entities could 

also be affected, most chemical 

manufacturers are usually identified 

under North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) code 325 

(Chemical manufacturing). 

II. Background 

A. What is 

Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4)? 

D4 is used as an intermediate for 

silicone copolymers and other 

chemicals. D4 is also used in industrial 

processing applications as a solvent 

(which becomes part of a product 

formulation or mixture), finishing agent, 

and an adhesive and sealant chemical 

(Ref. 1). It is also used for both 

consumer and commercial purposes in 

paints and coatings, and plastic and 

rubber products (Ref. 1) and has 

consumer uses in polishes, sanitation, 

soaps, detergents, adhesives, and 

sealants (Ref. 2). 

B. Why does EPA need environmental 

effects data on D4? 

D4 persists in sediment and 

bioaccumulates in aquatic species. Data 

show D4 to be toxic to aquatic and 

sediment-dwelling species. EPA has 

concerns regarding the environmental 

effects of D4. Environmental testing will 

help develop a better understanding of 

the potential effects of this chemical in 

the environment. 

III. ECA Development and Conclusion 

A. How is EPA going to obtain 

environmental testing on D4? 

EPA initiated steps and agreed to 

enter into this ECA with the Companies. 

On February 26, 2014, EPA received the 

ECA signed by the Companies, and on 

March 28, 2014, EPA signed the ECA 

and the Order that incorporates the 

ECA. The effective date of the ECA and 

the Order that incorporates the ECA is 

April 4, 2014. 

EPA uses ECAs to accomplish testing 

of chemicals for public health and 

environmental effects where a 

consensus exists concerning the need 

for and scope of testing (40 CFR 

790.1(c)). The procedures for ECA 

negotiations and the factors for 

determining whether a consensus exists 

are described at 40 CFR 790.22. 

B. What is the subject of the ECA and 

order incorporating the ECA? 

As specified in the ECA, the purpose 

of the testing program is to conduct 

environmental testing to help in 

characterizing sources and pathways of 

release of D4 to the environment and 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 18823 

resulting exposures of aquatic and 

sediment dwelling organisms to D4. 

The signatory companies shall submit 

a draft Study Plan and Quality 

Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) to carry 

out the environmental testing program 

set forth in Section VII. and Appendices 

1–8 of the ECA. EPA will review of the 

signatory companies’ draft submissions 

and, if consistent with Section IX.A. of 

the ECA, shall approve the submissions. 

The signatory companies shall conduct 

environmental testing in accordance 

with the Final Study Plan and Final 

QAPP approved by EPA. Following 

completion of environmental testing, 

the signatory companies shall submit a 

final report to EPA. 

C. What testing does the ECA for D4 

require? 

The ECA requires testing for the 

presence of D4 around specified 

wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) at 

the method detection limits specified in 

the test standards described in 

Appendices 4–8 of the ECA. 

Environmental testing will be 

conducted at direct discharge sites 

WWTPs (Appendix 1 of the ECA). Direct 

discharge sites are D4 manufacturing 

and/or processing sites that discharge 

process wastewater into the 

environment after on-site wastewater 

treatment. The concentration of D4 in 

the WWTP effluent (Appendix 4 of the 

ECA), and surface water (Appendix 5 of 

the ECA), sediment (Appendix 7 of the 

ECA), and biota (benthic organisms and 

two species of fish as noted in 

Appendix 8 of the ECA) in the WWTP 

receiving stream will be measured. 

Environmental testing will be 

conducted at WWTPs serving indirect 

discharge sites (Appendix 2 of the ECA). 

Indirect discharge sites are D4 

processing sites (including product 

formulation sites) that discharge process 

wastewater to offsite WWTPs. The 

concentration of D4 in the WWTP 

influent (Appendix 4 of the ECA), 

effluent (Appendix 4 of the ECA), and 

biosolids (Appendix 6 of the ECA), 

along with surface water (Appendix 5 of 

the ECA), sediment (Appendix 7 of the 

ECA), and biota (benthic organisms and 

two species of fish as noted in 

Appendix 8 of the ECA) in the WWTP 

receiving stream will be measured. 

Primarily non-industrial WWTPs 

receive less than 15% of wastewater 

from industrial facilities and, preferably, 

no wastewater from D4 manufacturing 

or processing (including product 

formulation) sites (Appendix 3 of the 

ECA). Environmental testing will be 

conducted at WWTPs serving primarily 

non-industrial wastewater treatment 

sites. The concentration of D4 in the 

WWTP influent (Appendix 4 of the 

ECA) and effluent (Appendix 4 of the 

ECA), and biosolids (Appendix 6 of the 

ECA), along with surface water 

(Appendix 5 of the ECA), sediment 

(Appendix 7 of the ECA), and biota 

(benthic organisms and two species of 

fish as noted in Appendix 8 of the ECA) 

in the WWTP receiving stream will be 

measured. 

TABLE 1—REQUIRED TESTING, TEST STANDARDS, REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: PHASES OF THE TESTING PROGRAM FOR

D4 

Event Phase Enforceable consent agreement (ECA) section and terms Deadline 

(days)1

1 ............. Effective date .............................. XXII. Date of Federal Register document publication ............................................. 0 

2 ............. Submission of Study Plan to 

EPA.

IX.A. No more than 120 days after effective date and at least 45 days prior to 

testing initiation.

120 

3 ............. Submission of Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) to 

EPA.

IX.A. No more than 180 days after effective date and at least 45 days prior to 

testing initiation (EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans (QA/ 

R5)) (Ref. 3).

180 

6 ............. Study Plan/QAPP Approval ........ IX.A. Study plan/QAPP approval at same time, within 60 days of receipt of QAPP 

by EPA.

240 

7 ............. Start of testing ............................ IX.B. Testing start no more than 60 days after study plan/QAPP approval; specific 

tests to be conducted at each site type as described in Unit III.C. 

300 

10 ........... End of testing ............................. IX.B. Testing completed within 360 days of testing start .......................................... 660 

12 ........... Environmental Monitoring Report IX.D. Final report no later than 150 days following completion of testing ................ 810 

1 Number of days, starting with the day following the completion of the previous ECA phase. 

D. What are the uses for the test data to 

be developed under the ECA? 

The final report is intended to be 

released to the public, as described at 

Section IX.D. of the ECA. These data 

will be used to develop D4 

environmental exposure and risk 

assessments. In addition, the data could 

be used by other Federal agencies (e.g., 

the Agency for Toxic Substances and 

Disease Registry (ATSDR), the 

Consumer Product Safety Commission 

(CPSC), and the Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA)) in assessing 

chemical risks and in taking appropriate 

actions within their programs. 

IV. Other Impacts of the ECA 

A. What if EPA should require 

additional environmental testing on D4? 

If EPA decides in the future that it 

requires additional environmental 

testing data, the Agency has authority to 

re-open the testing consent order 

process according to 40 CFR 790.68. 

B. How does the order affect TSCA 

export notification? 

As of the effective date of the ECA 

and the Order that incorporates the ECA 

under TSCA section 4 (i.e., the date of 

publication of this document in the 

Federal Register) any of the Companies, 

as well as any other person, who exports 

or intends to export any D4 that is the 

subject of this ECA and Order that 

incorporates the ECA, in any form, are 

subject to the export notification 

requirements of TSCA section 12(b). 

Procedures related to export notification 

are described in 40 CFR part 707, 

subpart D. EPA maintains lists of all 

chemical substances and mixtures with 

CAS numbers (40 CFR 799.5000) that 

are subject to testing consent orders. 

This document revises the listing for D4, 

CAS. No. 556–67–2, that is the subject 

of this ECA and Order that incorporates 

the ECA in the list at 40 CFR 799.5000. 

Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the 

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an 

agency for good cause finds that public 

notice and comment procedures are 

impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest, the agency may 

issue a rule without providing notice 

and an opportunity for public comment. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
18824 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA has determined that there is good 

cause for adding this chemical to the list 

at 40 CFR 799.5000 without prior 

proposal and opportunity for comment 

because such notice and opportunity for 

comment is unnecessary since the 

export notification requirements are 

imposed by statute. Section 12(b) of 

TSCA requires any person who exports 

or intends to export to a foreign country 

a chemical substance or mixture for 

which the submission of data is 

required under TSCA section 4 to 

submit a notification of the export or 

intended export to EPA. TSCA section 

12(b) operates regardless of whether this 

chemical is added to the list at 40 CFR 

799.5000; the inclusion of this chemical 

in the list promotes awareness of that 

operation of statutory law. Therefore, 

EPA has determined that notice and an 

opportunity for comment on whether 

this chemical is added to the list at 40 

CFR 799.5000 is unnecessary because 

the export notification requirements in 

TSCA section 12(b) would apply even if 

this chemical is not added to 40 CFR 

799.5000. 

C. What are the economic implications 

of the ECA? 

Based on the economic analysis 

conducted for the ECA, the Agency 

expects the cost of the testing to be 

performed under this ECA to range from 

$1,000,000 to $1,200,000. The estimated 

total cost for industry to conduct the 

required testing under the ECA is 

$1,200,000, which is the upper end of 

the estimated cost range. EPA 

anticipates that the costs for testing 

under this ECA will have a low 

potential for adverse economic impact 

on the regulated community because the 

costs for testing will be shared across 

five companies that are signatories to 

the ECA and the Order that incorporates 

the ECA. 

Export regulations promulgated 

pursuant to TSCA section 12(b)—40 

CFR part 707, subpart D—require only 

a one-time notification to each foreign 

country of export for each chemical for 

which data are required to be developed 

under TSCA section 4. EPA prepared 

estimates of the cost and burden of the 

July 27, 1993, amendment to the rules 

implementing TSCA section 12(b) and 

included these in the Information 

Collection Request to support the rule 

most recently updated in 2012 (Ref. 4). 

EPA estimates that the average cost of 

preparing and submitting the TSCA 

section 12(b) notification for a submitter 

of any TSCA section12(b) notification is 

$79 when adjusted for inflation to 2012 

dollars with an associated average 

burden of 1.3 hours (Ref. 5). 

V. References 

As indicated under ADDRESSES, a 

docket has been established for this 

final rule under docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OPPT–2012–0209. The following is 

a listing of the documents that are 

specifically referenced in this action. 

The docket includes these documents 

and other information considered by 

EPA, including documents that are 

referenced within the documents that 

are included in the docket, even if the 

referenced document is not physically 

located in the docket. For assistance in 

locating these other documents, please 

consult the technical person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

1. EPA. Chemical Data Reporting Database. 

2012. 

2. EPA. Inventory Update Reporting 

Database. 2006. 

3. EPA. EPA Requirements for Quality 

Assurance Project Plans (QA/R5). 

4. EPA. Export Notification Requirement; 

Change to Reporting Requirements; Final 

Rule. Federal Register (58 FR 40238, July 27, 

1993.) 

5. EPA. Estimates of Burden and Costs for 

the Siloxanes Enforceable Consent 

Agreement. 2014. 

6. EPA. EPA ICR No.: 0795.14 Information 

Collection Request for Notification of 

Chemical Exports—TSCA Section 12(b) 

Supporting Statement for Request for OMB 

Review under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 

OMB Control Number 2070–0030. 2012. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866 

This action announces an Order that 

incorporates an ECA between EPA and 

the Companies. Under Executive Order 

12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning 

and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 

1993), this action is not a ‘‘regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

According to PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 

seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, an information collection 

request unless it displays a currently 

valid control number assigned by OMB. 

The OMB control numbers for the EPA’s 

regulations in title 40 of the CFR are 

listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

The information collection 

requirements related to the Order that 

incorporates the ECA have already been 

approved by OMB pursuant to PRA 

under OMB control number 2070–0033 

(EPA ICR No. 1139.09). The one-time 

public burden for this collection of 

information is estimated to be 

approximately 200 hours per response 

(i.e., per company), or 1,000 hours total 

burden for the companies (Ref. 5). 

Under PRA, ‘‘burden’’ means the total 

time, effort, or financial resources 

expended by persons to generate, 

maintain, retain, or disclose or provide 

information to or for a Federal agency. 

For this collection, it includes the time 

needed to review instructions; complete 

and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

The information collection 

requirements related to export 

notification requirements under TSCA 

section 12(b), including those related to 

the ECA and the Order that incorporates 

the ECA, have already been approved by 

OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB 

control number 2070–0030 (EPA ICR 

No. 0795). The public reporting burden 

for this information collection is 

estimated to be 1.3 hours per response 

(Ref. 6). 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

Since the issuance of the ECA and the 

Order that incorporates the ECA, as well 

as the applicability of the export 

notification requirements of TSCA 

section 12(b) to chemicals addressed in 

the ECA and the Order that incorporates 

the ECA, do not require the issuance of 

a proposed rule, the requirements of 

RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA) 

This action does not impose any 

enforceable duty or contain any 

unfunded mandate as described under 

Title II of UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). 

Therefore, this action is not subject to 

the requirements of UMRA. 

E. Executive Order 13132 and 13175 

This action is not expected to impact 

State or Tribal governments because 

these governments are not expected to 

export the chemicals covered by the 

ECA or the Order that incorporates the 

ECA. As such, the Agency has 

determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132, entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999). Nor will this action have Tribal 

implications because it does not 

significantly or uniquely affect the 

communities of Indian Tribal 

governments, or involve or impose any 

requirements that affect Indian Tribes. 

Accordingly, the requirements of 

Executive Order 13175, entitled 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 18825 

‘‘Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply. 

F. Executive Order 13045 

Executive Order 13045, entitled 

‘‘Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), 

does not apply to this action because 

this action is not designated as an 

‘‘economically significant’’ regulatory 

action as defined by Executive Order 

12866 (see Unit VI.A.), nor does this 

action establish an environmental 

standard that is intended to have a 

disproportionate effect on children. To 

the contrary, this action will provide 

data and information that EPA and 

others can use to assess the risks of 

these chemicals, including potential 

risks to sensitive subpopulations. 

G. Executive Order 13211 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001), because this action is not 

expected to affect energy supply, 

distribution, or use. 

H. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTAA) 

Section 12(d) of NTTAA (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary 

consensus standards in its regulatory 

activities unless to do so would be 

inconsistent with applicable law or 

otherwise impractical. Voluntary 

consensus standards are technical 

standards (e.g., materials specifications, 

test methods, sampling procedures, and 

business practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. The NTTAA directs 

EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, 

explanations when the Agency decides 

not to use available and applicable 

voluntary consensus standards. 

The testing conducted under the ECA 

involves technical standards. The 

Agency conducted a search to identify 

potentially applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. No such standard 

was identified for environmental testing 

of D4 that is the subject of the ECA. 

I. Executive Order 12898 

This action does not entail special 

considerations of environmental justice 

related issues as delineated by 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 799 

Environmental protection, Chemicals, 

D4, Exports, Hazardous substances, 

Health and safety, Laboratories, 

Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Siloxane. 

Dated: March 28, 2014. 

James Jones, 

Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical 

Safety and Pollution Prevention. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 799—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 799 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603, 2611, 2625. 

■ 2. In § 799.5000, revise the entry 

‘‘CAS Number 556–67–2’’ to read as 

follows: 

§ 799.5000 Testing consent orders for 

substances and mixtures with Chemical 

Abstract Service Registry Numbers. 

* * * * * 

CAS No. Substance or mixture name Testing FR publication date 

*******

556–67–2 Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) ............................... Chemical fate ...................................

Environmental effects ......................

Environmental testing ......................

January 10, 1989. 

January 10, 1989. 

April 4, 2014. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–07557 Filed 4–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 64 

[Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002; [Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–8327] 

Suspension of Community Eligibility 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule identifies 

communities where the sale of flood 

insurance has been authorized under 

the National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP) that are scheduled for 

suspension on the effective dates listed 

within this rule because of 

noncompliance with the floodplain 

management requirements of the 

program. If the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) receives 

documentation that the community has 

adopted the required floodplain 

management measures prior to the 

effective suspension date given in this 

rule, the suspension will not occur and 

a notice of this will be provided by 

publication in the Federal Register on a 

subsequent date. Also, information 

identifying the current participation 

status of a community can be obtained 

from FEMA’s Community Status Book 

(CSB). The CSB is available at http://

www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm. 

DATES: Effective Dates: The effective 

date of each community’s scheduled 

suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) 

listed in the third column of the 

following tables. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you want to determine whether a 

particular community was suspended 

on the suspension date or for further 

information, contact David Stearrett, 

Federal Insurance and Mitigation 

Administration, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2953. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP 

enables property owners to purchase 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES