alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>                           0000942317
<NAME>                          INTRAV, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,836
<SECURITIES>                                     4,730
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,742
<PP&E>                                          37,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,572
<SALES>                                         87,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,245
<CGS>                                           70,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,796
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,194
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63

</TABLE>
L O C K T O N C O M P A N I E S

Cyber Risk

Discussion

FACI
1

What does cyber mean to us?
2

Companies must leverage internal and external relationships and 

expertise to get the most accurate picture of their cyber exposure:

They must understand:

Value of data assets at risk

Actual cost to rebuild or replace data assets

Impact of cyber attack 

Organizational record count PHI/PCI/PII
3

They must understand:

Where contractual indemnities are provided or not 

provided

Cultural awareness of privacy training 

implementation, data security, & social engineering

How many ‘at risk records’ lie within one 

database or application
4

Develop an Incident Response Plan

To be prepared to respond with a unified & impactful 

approach 

Use internal resources & outside support as needed

Why?
5

Cyber Enterprise Risk Management

IDENTIFY

PROTECT

DETECT

RESPOND

RECOVER

Cyber Risk strategy built on the fundamentals of the NIST framework:
6

Hackers Are Becoming 

More Sophisticated
7

Data Theft – Economic & Political Advantage 
8

Cyber Criminals – Financial Gain 
9

Hacktivism - Defamation
10

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack

Dyn, the victim of last week’s denial of service attack, said it was 

orchestrated using a weapon called the Mirai botnet.

Destructive Attack – Disrupt Operations
11

Assets = Exposure

Understand your threat environment

Identify & protect your mission critical assets
12

Threats Dependent on Organization 

Intellectual Property & 

Corporate Confidential 

Information 

Personal Data Physical

36 

 Patents

 Trademarks

 Industrial Design 

 Trade Secrets

 Personally Identifiable 

Information

 Personal Health Information

 Payment Card Data

 Operating control systems 

remotely through 

corporate IT network 

creates vulnerabilities to 

physical assets 
13

What Is the Insurance Industry Doing About It? 
14

Challenges for the Insurance Industry

• Lack of actuarial data

• Risk aggregation
15

Evaluation of Risk Transfer

Quantitative Factors

o Contracts

o Geography

o Industry Sector

o Cyber Threat Landscape

o Privacy

o Data Type and Amount

o Breach Scenario Costs

Qualitative Factors

o Information Technology 

 Security

o Privacy

o Risk Tolerance

o Peer Benchmarking

o Cost of Capital

o D&O Macro Market

o Budget
16

Risk Transfer Process

Identify Discuss Prepare Execute Support
17

Risk Transfer Process

How can the government help? 
18

Our Mission

To be the worldwide value and service leader in insurance brokerage, 

risk management, employee benefits, and retirement services

Our Goal

To be the best place to do business and to work

RISK MANAGEMENT | EMPLOYEE BENEFITS | RETIREMENT SERVICES

lockton.com

© 2017 Lockton, Inc. All rights reserved.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 75 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 75

      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``National Good Teen Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

  Mr. Traficant introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``National Good Teen Day''.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed January 16, 1992, as 
        ``Good Teen Day'';
Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in the United States 
        according to the 1990 Census;
Whereas our Nation's teenagers represent an important part of our society, and 
        the many physical and emotional changes and character-building 
        experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;
Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who have problems or 
        those who excel;
Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their intelligence, 
        abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the good which is inherent 
        in all human beings;
Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to esteem the good as 
        well as the potential that is within each of them;
Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive qualities in America's 
        youth; and
Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That January 16, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Good Teen Day,'' and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers 
of the United States and by participating in appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 22222.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 25, 1942.

Jimmie Cunningham, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing for sale intoxicating liquor in Young County, a dry area; punishment being a fine of $150.

Officers secured a search warrant authorizing a search for alcoholic beverages of the premises of Frank Crutchfield, including a rock filling station. Upon making the search nothing was found on the premises described. Appellant was working for Crutchfield at the filling station servicing cars. The officers left after the search, apparently abandoning the effort to find any contraband liquor. One of the officers returned in a short time and secreted himself where he could watch the filling station. Cars would drive up to the station and appellant would leave the station and go into a pasture, sometimes to one place and again to another place. On some trips he would get a bottle of whisky, and on others a bottle of beer. When appellant would return to the station the cars would drive away. After watching appellant make several of these trips the officer went to the places where he had seen appellant go, and at one point he found five pints of whisky, and at the other found thirteen cans of ice-cold beer in a water can. The liquor mentioned was not on the Crutch-field premises, nor on any premises described in the search warrant.

*733Appellant objected to the evidence of the officer regarding the movements of appellant and finding the beer and whisky upon various grounds, one being that the place where it was found was not described in the search warrant. This objection is apparently predicated upon the idea that the liquor was found as a result of a search under the warrant. The trial court states in his explanation to one of the bills of exception that the liquor was found in “an open pasture” some two hundred yards from the filling station. The liquor was discovered not by reason of the search warrant, but by reason of the officer’s observation. The record fails to show to whom the “pasture” belonged. Appellant was in no position under the evidence to claim any invasion of his rights. Craft v. State, 107 Tex.Cr.R. 130, 295 S.W. 617, Duncan v. State, 111 Tex.Cr.R. 633, 13 S. W.2d 703; Salinas v. State, 113 Tex.Cr.R. 142, 18 S.W.2d 663.

Another objection urged against the evidence of the officer was that appellant was not named in the search warrant. A complete answer to that objection is that the officer was not acting under the warrant.

The further objection that the discovery of the liquor was not upon probable cause seems directly overcome by testimony of the officer as to the things he saw preceding the finding of the whisky and beer.

The judgment is affirmed.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00168

- CR

P ETER H UNG N GUYEN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Ap pe al from the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 1733813 )

April 4, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judg me nt. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIMOTHY BARTON, 

CARNEGIE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

WALL007, LLC,

WALL009, LLC,

WALL010, LLC,

WALL011, LLC,

WALL012, LLC,

WALL016, LLC,

WALL017, LLC,

WALL018, LLC,

WALL019, LLC,

HAOQIANG FU (a/k/a MICHAEL FU),

STEPHEN T. WALL,

Defendants,

DJD LAND PARTNERS, LLC, and

LDG001, LLC,

Relief Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-2118-X

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S MOTION TO RATIFY AGREEMENT 

WITH DLP CAPITAL AND OTHER DLP ENTITIES

Before the Court is the Receiver’s Motion to Ratify Agreement with DLP 

Capital and Other DLP Entities.1 [Doc. No. 95]. The Court notes that the Receiver 

1 The “DLP Entities” include DLP Real Estate Capital, Inc., DLP Winter Haven Ventures, 

LLC, Orchard Farms Ventures, LLC, and Marine Creek Ventures, LLC. Doc. No. 95 at 1.

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 109 Filed 12/22/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2765
2

was not obligated to obtain the Court’s approval for this action,2 but it agrees with 

the Receiver that his proposed agreement with the DLP Entities, as described in the 

instant motion,3 is in the best interests of the Receivership. Accordingly, the Court 

GRANTS the motion and RATIFIES the Receiver’s agreement with the DLP 

Entities.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of December, 2022.

____________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2 See Doc. No. 29 (granting the Receiver the power to, “without further Order of th[e] Court, 

transfer, compromise, or otherwise dispose of any Receivership Property, other than real estate, in the 

ordinary course of business, on terms and in the manner the Receiver deems most beneficial to the 

Receivership Estate, and with due regard to the realization of the true and proper value of such 

Receivership Property”).

3 Doc. No. 95 at 10–30.

Case 3:22-cv-02118-X Document 109 Filed 12/22/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2766
(logo) Rialto

           CAPITAL

 

 

2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2015 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-LC20, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-LC20

 

(WFCM 2015-LC20)

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein ce1tifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of March 31, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2016
----

MEDIA 2007 — Development, distribution promotion and training

Call for proposals — EACEA No 18/06

Training

(2006/C 320/12)

1.   Objectives and Description

This call for proposals is based on the Decision No 1718/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a single multi-annual programme for Community measures in the field of Audiovisual for the period between 2007 and 2013

One of the measures to be implemented under this Decision involves improving the continuous vocational training of professionals in the audiovisual sector, so as to give them the know-how and skills needed to create competitive products on the European and other markets, in particular in the field of:

2.   Eligible Candidates

The present notification is addressed to European organisations; those registered in and controlled by nationals from the Member States of the European Union and countries of the European Economic Agreement participating in the MEDIA 2007 Programme (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway), as well as Switzerland, subject to the conclusion of a new cooperation agreement with this country in the framework of the MEDIA Programme.

This notice is addressed to candidates in one of the categories of establishment below whose activities contribute to the above-mentioned measures:

3.   Budget for projects

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals is EUR 4 340 000, provided funds are available under the 2007 exercise.

The financial support from the Commission cannot exceed 50 %/60 % of the total eligible costs.

The financial contribution will be awarded in the form of a grant.

The maximum duration of projects is 12 months.

4.   Deadline for submission of applications

Applications must be sent to the Executive Agency (EACEA) no later than 9 March 2007

5.   Full details

The full text of the call for proposals, together with the application forms, can be found at the following Internet address:.

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/media/forma_en.html

Applications must comply with all the terms of the full text and be submitted on the form provided.

----
Case 5:22-cr-00084-H-BQ Document 65 Filed 02/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 146
Case 5:22-cr-00084-H-BQ Document 65 Filed 02/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 147
#### PARMER v. STATE.

No. 26073.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 26, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Drunk driving upon -a public highway is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $50.

No statement of facts accompanies the record, in the absence of which this court is unable to appraise the bill of exception presented.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 303 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 303

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 4 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                 May 11 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   To designate June 6, 1994, as ``D-Day National Remembrance Day''.

Whereas June 6, 1994, marks the fiftieth anniversary of D-Day, the day of the 
        beginning of the Allied assault at Normandy, France, during World War 
        II;
Whereas the D-Day assault, known as Operation Overlord, was the most extensive 
        amphibious operation ever to occur, involving on the first day of the 
        operation five thousand ships, over eleven thousand sorties of Allied 
        aircraft, and one hundred and fifty-three thousand American, British, 
        and Canadian troops;
Whereas five separate beaches were assaulted, with American forces commanded by 
        Lieutenant General Omar Bradley attacking Omaha and Utah beaches and 
        British and Canadian forces commanded by General Miles Dempsey attacking 
        Gold, Juno, and Sword beaches;
Whereas American troops suffered significant losses during the assault, 
        including over six thousand five hundred casualties;
Whereas the D-Day assault was among the most critical events of World War II, 
        with the success of the Allied landings in Normandy providing the 
        foothold for the liberation of France and the eventual Allied 
        breakthrough into Germany and leading ultimately to the Allied victory 
        in Europe; and
Whereas June 6, 1944, is one of the most significant dates in the history of the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That June 6, 1994, is 
designated as ``D-Day National Remembrance Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate 
programs, ceremonies, and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Official Journal L 131/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 131 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4918 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 131

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4918 May 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Decision No 2/2005 of the EC-Iceland Joint Committee of 22 December 2005 amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation | 1 |
| Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation | 2 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Decision No 2/2005 of the EC-Iceland Joint Committee of 22 December 2005 amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

1

Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

2

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MELEANNIE J. OWADE, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § NO. 4:22-cv-00880-O-BP

§

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, §

INC, et al., §

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED on this 15th day of November, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00880-O Document 8 Filed 11/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 34