alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1055

To direct the Secretary of Defense to issue a commendation to each individual

exposed to mustard agents during World War II, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. GOSS (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. BROWDER, and Mr.

BILIRAKIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Defense to issue a commendation

to each individual exposed to mustard agents during

World War II, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ISSUANCE OF COMMENDATION TO INDIVID4 UALS EXPOSED TO MUSTARD AGENTS DUR5 ING WORLD WAR II.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall

7 issue to each individual described in subsection (b) a com8 mendation in honorary recognition of the individual’s spe9 cial service, loyalty, and contribution to the United States.
2

•HR 1055 IH

1 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—An individual referred

2 to in subsection (a) is an individual who, as a member

3 of the armed forces or an employee of the Department

4 of War, was exposed to mustard agents in connection with

5 testing performed by the Department of War during

6 World War II.

7 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF EXPOSURE.

8 The Secretary of Defense shall notify each individual

9 described in section 1 of the exposure described in such

10 section, the possible health effects of the exposure, and

11 the likely options available to the individual for medical

12 treatment for health effects resulting from the exposure.

13 SEC. 3. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.

14 The Secretary of Defense shall make available to the

15 Secretary of Veterans Affairs any information of the De16 partment of Defense regarding the exposure described in

17 section 1, including the names of the individuals subjected

18 to the exposure.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 47

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 limiting the number of consecutive terms for Members of the House of 
                    Representatives and the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mr. Solomon introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 limiting the number of consecutive terms for Members of the House of 
                    Representatives and the Senate.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. A person may not serve any portion of a term as a 
Representative if the person has served as a Representative for more 
than one year of each of the six terms that immediately precede the 
term.
    ``Section 2. A person may not serve any portion of a term as a 
Senator if the person has served as a Senator for more than three years 
of each of the two terms that immediately precede the term.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not prevent a person who is serving 
any portion of a term as a Representative or Senator on the date of the 
ratification of this article from serving the remainder of the term.''.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MC TRILOGY TEXAS, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-2154-D

§

CITY OF HEATH, TEXAS, §

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 AND ORDER 

The court in MC Trilogy Tex., LLC v. City of Heath, 2023 WL 7190652, at *1 (N.D.

Tex. Nov. 1, 2023) (Fitzwater, J.), ordered that defendant the City of Heath, Texas (“Heath”)

and non-party the City of McLendon-Chisholm, Texas (“McLendon”) meet and confer

regarding the scope of Heath’s subpoena duces tecum served on McLendon. In response, the

parties have submitted a joint status report describing the remaining discovery disputes. 

Having reviewed the joint status report, the court orders that the subpoena duces tecum be

modified to limit the scope of discovery to the period January 1, 2020 to the present.

In the Fifth Circuit, “a party who opposes its opponent’s request for production [must]

‘show specifically how . . . each [request] is not relevant or how each [request] is overly

broad, burdensome or oppressive.’” Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc., 227 F.R.D. 475, 477

(N.D. Tex. 2005) (Lynn, J.) (second alteration in original) (quoting McLeod, Alexander,

Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Quarles, 894 F.2d 1482, 1485 (5th Cir. 1990)); see also Orchestrate

HR, Inc. v. Trombetta, 178 F.Supp.3d 476, 506 (N.D. Tex. 2016) (Horan, J.). “Importantly,

the Fifth Circuit applied this standard even when the relevance of the disputed discovery

Case 3:22-cv-02154-D Document 193 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4177
requests was not readily apparent to the trial court.” Merrill, 227 F.R.D. at 477. McLendon,

as the person resisting discovery, bears the burden to establish that the information sought

is not relevant or proportional to the needs of the case. 

But McLendon makes no argument establishing that discovery from January 1, 2020

to the present is not relevant or proportional to the needs of the case. McLendon only asserts

that the subpoena duces tecum should be limited in time from October 2020 to November

2021. Because McLendon has failed to satisfy its burden to show that the requested

discovery exceeds the scope permitted under Rule 26(b)(1), the court orders that the

subpoena duces tecum be modified to limit the scope of discovery to the period January 1,

2020 to the present.

SO ORDERED.

December 11, 2023.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

SENIOR JUDGE

 - 2 -

Case 3:22-cv-02154-D Document 193 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4178
# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Hells Canyon Subgroup of the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council will meet on March 9 and 10, 2000, at the Baker Ranger District, 3165 10th Street, Baker City, Oregon. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 5 p.m. the first day                         Start Printed Page 6355                        and will begin at 8 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m. on the second day. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Review draft CMP alternatives and, (2) Open Public forum. All meetings are open to the public. Public comments will be received at 1:30 p.m. on March 9.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Kendall Clark, Area Ranger, USDA, Hells Canyon National Recreation Area, 88401 Highway 82, Enterprise, OR 97828, 541-426-5501.

Dated: February 3, 2000.

Karyn L. Wood,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-2985  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27443-27444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10756]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9946-10-OARM; EPA-HQ-OARM-2016-0214]

Public Availability of Environmental Protection Agency FY 2015 
Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-117), the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is publishing this notice to 
advise the public of the availability of the FY 2015 Service Contract 
Inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2015. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the Agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), Service Contract Inventories 
(December 19, 2011). The Environmental Protection Agency has posted its 
inventory and a summary of the inventory on the EPA's homepage at the 
following link: http://www.epa.gov/oam/inventory/inventory.htm

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Linear Cherry in the Office of 
Acquisition Management, Policy, Training, and Oversight Division 
(3802R), Financial Analysis and Oversight Service Center, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; 
telephone number: (202)

[[Page 27444]]

564-4403; email address: cherry.linear@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

General Information

How can I get copies of this docket and other related information?

    1. The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
No. EPA-HQ-OARM-2016-0214. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard 
copy at the FY 2015 Service Contract Inventory Docket in the EPA Docket 
Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 
566-1744, and the telephone number for the FY 2015 Service Contract 
Inventory Docket is (202) 566-1752.
    2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document 
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' 
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.

    Dated: April 12, 2016.
John R. Bashista,
Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
[FR Doc. 2016-10756 Filed 5-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 3

Case 7:22-cv-00108-O Document 1-3 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 33
# Official Journal L 229/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 229 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4923 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 229

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4923 August 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1258/2006 of 22 August 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1259/2006 of 11 August 2006 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 as regards the catch limits for the stock of Norway pout in ICES zones IIa (EC waters), IIIa and IV (EC waters) | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1258/2006 of 22 August 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1259/2006 of 11 August 2006 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 as regards the catch limits for the stock of Norway pout in ICES zones IIa (EC waters), IIIa and IV (EC waters)

3

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 17 August 2006 on the financing of expenditure on computer support and communication measures in the field of animal health and welfare for 2006 | 5 |
| | * | Commission Recommendation of 17 August 2006 on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| | * | Commission Decision of 22 August 2006 on certain protective measures against bluetongue
  (notified under document number C(2006) 3849)

   (
  1
  ) | 10 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 17 August 2006 on the financing of expenditure on computer support and communication measures in the field of animal health and welfare for 2006

5

*

Commission Recommendation of 17 August 2006 on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding (
  1
  )

1

7

*

Commission Decision of 22 August 2006 on certain protective measures against bluetongue
  (notified under document number C(2006) 3849)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document number C(2006) 3849)

1

10

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2013032EN.01000401.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte (Portugal) lodged on 9 November 2012 — IPTM-Instituto Portuário e dos Transportes Marítimos v Navileme-Consultadoria Náutica, Lda, Nautizende — Consultadoria Náutica, Lda

(Case C-509/12)

2013/C 32/05

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: IPTM-Instituto Portuário e dos Transportes Marítimos

Applicant:

Defendants: Navileme-Consultadoria Náutica, Lda, Nautizende — Consultadoria Náutica, Lda

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the law of the European Union, having regard to the principle of prohibition of discrimination between nationals of one Member State and nationals of another Member State (Article 18 TFEU, formerly Article 12 EC), having regard to the free movement of persons in the EU and exceptions thereto (Article 45(3) TFEU, formerly Article 39 EC) and having regard to the freedom to provide services and possible restrictions thereof (Article 52 TFEU, formerly Article 46 EC, by virtue of Article 62 TFEU, formerly Article 55 EC), be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law which requires residence within national territory as a precondition for the issue of a recreational boating licence?

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2015-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 

March 27, 2018

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
Case 3:22-cr-00096-M Document 25 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

August 28, 2012

t0828

Order 

August 28, 2012

145755

THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145755

BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS,

DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS, and

SECRETARY OF STATE,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered and, pursuant to 

MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting relief on the complaint, we DIRECT the Clerk to 

schedule oral argument on August 30, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., on whether to grant relief or 

take other peremptory action. At oral argument the parties shall include among the issues 

addressed whether the republication requirement of Const 1963, art 12, § 2 and MCL 

168.482(3), requiring that petitions set forth any other existing provisions of the 

constitution that would be altered or abrogated by the proposed amendment, has been 

satisfied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Plaintiff

Defendant

v.

Civil Action No.

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS',6&/2685(67$7(0(17

(This form also satisfies Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and LR 3.1(c), LR 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.1(a)(4)(D), and LR 81.2,

provides the following information:

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state "None"): 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are 

financially interested in the outcome of the case: 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

Case 3:22-cv-01935-X Document 30 Filed 07/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 351
Case 3:22-cv-01935-X Document 30 Filed 07/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 352
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 208 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 208

    Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-
 favored-nation treatment) to the products of the People's Republic of 
                                 China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1993

  Mr. Solomon (for himself, Mr. Markey, Mr. Applegate, and Mr. King) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-
 favored-nation treatment) to the products of the People's Republic of 
                                 China.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
approve the extension of the authority contained in section 402(c) of 
the Trade Act of 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on 
May 28, 1993, with respect to the People's Republic of China.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
------------

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Northeast  Indiana
Bancorp,  Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Stephen E. Zahn,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Stephen E. Zahn
    ----------------------------------
Name: Stephen E. Zahn
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 10, 2004

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
Staff upon request.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             23.