alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00212
- CV

R. G. and S. G., Appellant s

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 19
- 000005 , THE HONORABLE D A RLENE BYRNE, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant R. G. filed his notice of appeal on March 24, 2020 . The appellate record was complete April 10, 2020 , making appellant’s brief due April 30, 2020

. To date, appellan t’s brief has not been fil e d

.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals
from suits for te rmination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accele rated schedule requires grea t er compliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore, we order Karen J. Langsley to file appellant’s brief no later than May 22, 2020 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why
she should not be held in contempt of co u rt

.

It is ordered on May 6, 2020

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith
# United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

___________

No. 20-20068

___________ Donald Calhoun,

Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus

Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated,

Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CV-3171

______________________________

Before Jolly, Graves, and Duncan, Circuit Judges

.

Per Curiam:

The opinion in this case issued on August 7, 2020 ( Calhoun v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc. , No. 20-20068, 2020 WL 4557641 (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 2020)). Unbeknownst to this court, the parties had settled the case earlier and notified only the district court of the settlement. This case is moot, and it was moot at the time we issued our opinion.
The opinion of August 7, 2020 is WITHDRAWN , and this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as moot. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 28, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Murdakes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                                /s/ James Murdakes
                                                ------------------
                                                James Murdakes
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                August 14, 2002
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            Joint Forces Staff College
                Joint Forces Staff College
        Search
                    Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                        Search
                Search Joint Forces Staff College:
                    Search
    Home

    Coronavirus

    About 
        Overview

    College Leadership

    College Chaplain

    Contact Information

    Denton Learning Center

    Employment

    History

    Institutional Research

    JFSC Faculty

    Women, Peace, and Security (WPS)

    Academics
    
        Accreditation

    Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)
        
        Program Description

    Prerequisites

    Reporting Instructions

    Schedule

    JCWS Hybrid (JCWS-H)

    JCWS Satellite (JCWS-S)

    Joint Information School (JIS)
        
        C4I Division

    Information Division

    Joint Transition Course (JTC)

    International Fellows
        
        Incoming Fellows

    Programs

    Alumni

    Contact Us

    Senior Fellows Program

    Libraries

    Faculty Resources

    Students
    
        All Course Schedules

    Incoming Students

    NDU Academic Policies

    Security Manager/SSO

    Uniform Policy

    Registrar

    Media
    
        Campaigning Journals
        
        About Us

    Issues & Articles

    Submissions

    Masthead

    News

    Commentary  News News
 JFSC Weather Hotline
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 DoD Link Disclaimer
   DoD Annual Performance Plans
   NDU FOIA RequestsDoD Privacy Policy
   DoD Plain Writing
   NDU System of Records NoticeDoD Open Government
   DoD Information Quality
   NDU Privacy PolicyDoD Privacy Program
   DoD Section 508
   NDU Privacy ProgramDoD No FEAR Act
   USA.gov
   NDU.edu Site Map
                    Joint Forces Staff College
   7800 Hampton Blvd.
   Norfolk, VA 23511-1702

   Contact JFSC

   Report JFSC Website Issues
   or Suggestion for Improvement

   SAPR Resources
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6391-6392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2986]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Application

AGENCY:  Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION:  Notice of receipt of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531, et seq.).

Permit Number TE022454-0

    Applicant: The Nature Conservancy, Michigan Chapter, East Lansing, 
Michigan; Helen Taylor, State Director

[[Page 6392]]

    The applicant requests a permit for the purpose of determining 
management strategies for the Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa 
samuelis) in southwestern Newaygo County, Michigan. The applicant 
proposes to complete the following activities which may take the Karner 
blue butterfly: (1) Control and eliminate invasive alien plants, 
particularly spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa), by the initiation 
of a proposed burn regime, hand-pulling and spot-burning, (2) research 
and monitoring of the species to determine the impacts of the 
management regime described above, and (3) to expand and restore 
suitable habitat for occupation by the species. Take (kill, harass) is 
expected to occur in association with proposed activities. Activities 
are proposed for the enhancement of survival of the species in the 
wild.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services 
Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056, and 
must be received within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review by any party who submits a written request for a 
copy of such documents to the following office within 30 days of the 
date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Ecological Services Operations, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, 
Minnesota 55111-4056. Telephone: (612/713-5350); FAX: (612/713-5292).

    Dated: February 3, 2000.
Charles M. Wooley,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort 
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 00-2986 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1347-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Arizona, (FEMA-1347-DR), dated October 27, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 16, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Arizona is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 27, 2000:

Pinal County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance

Gila River Indian Community for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance

Maricopa County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 00-30076 Filed 11-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### ELDER et ux. v. WEHMEYER et al.

No. 11026.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Oct. 15, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 12, 1941.

C. C. Carsner, C. C. Carsner, Jr., and Edw. C. Thomas, all of Victoria, for appellants.

Carey Legett and R. H. Hamilton, both of Port Lavaca, for appellee.

*671MURRAY, Justice.

This is a trespass to try title suit instituted by appellants, J. A. Elder and wife, Mary Elder, against appellees, Irvin J. Wehmeyer, Netta Wehmeyer; J. B. Moore and First State Bank of Port Lavaca, Texas, seeking to recover 1271⁄2 acres of land situated about six miles north of Port Lavaca and fronting on Lavaca Bay.

Judgment was rendered that appellants take nothing, based upon jury findings made in response to special issues submitted.

Appellants’ first contention is that the deed, absolute on its face, executed by them on the 6th day of December, 1926, to J. B. Moore, is shown as a matter of law to be a mortgage upon their homestead when' construed in connection with the written agreement contemporaneously executed by the same parties, and that the trial court erred in admitting parol evidence to show the intentions of the parties.

We overrule this contention. If, in fact, the two instruments are unambiguous and are to be construed together as a matter of law, without being varied in any way by parol evidence, then they show a conditional sale of the 1271⁄2 acres of land and not a mortgage. The deed is absolute in form and is in every respect a warranty deed.

The written agreement is a lease contract whereby the grantors in the deed lease the 1271⁄2 acres from the grantee for a period of one year, agreeing to pay as rent one-third of the grain and one-fourth of the cotton. The third paragraph of the lease contract. provides, in effect, that the parties shall have one year from the date of the deed to redeem the land by paying to the grantee an equal amount of money paid by him with 8% interest.

Appellants did not redeem the land within the one-year period allowed, and the conveyance thereafter became an absolute sale of the 1271⁄2 acres of land. McMurry v. Mercer, Tex.Civ.App., 73 S.W.2d 1087; Wright v. Richcreek, Tex.Civ.App., 86 S.W.2d 478.

 However, if the deed and agreement do not show a conditional sale as a matter of law, but present some ambiguity, then the trial court' properly admitted parol evidence on which the jury have found, in effect, that after the deed, dated December 6, 1926, was executed and delivered by appellants to J. B. Moore no further debt existed between them and the First State Bank of Port Lavaca. If no debt existed there could be no mortgage. Callaway v. Snead, Tex.Civ.App., 33 S.W.2d 552; Smith v. Koennecke, Tex.Civ.App., 73 S.W.2d 933; Wright v. Richcreek, supra; McMurry v. Mercer, supra.

The evidence being conflicting as to the intentions of the parties in executing the deed and agreement, we are bound by the finding of the jury.

The conclusions we have expressed above render it unnecessary to determine whether or not Irvin J. Wehmeyer was an innocent purchaser of the land.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000942788
<NAME> NEOPHARM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,391,111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,451,160
<PP&E>                                         150,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,558,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,758
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,278,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,558,522
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               695,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (695,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (695,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (697,139)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Transport Airplane Directora te 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W ashington 98057 - 3356

September 27 , 2012 Mr. Doug Lane, Director, Deputy L ead Administrator Regulatory

Administration The Boeing Company PO Box 3707 Seattle, Washington, 98124 Dear Mr. Lane; We received your petition which was posted on the FAA regulations.go v website on September 4, 2012 and has your stamped date of July 9, 2012 , for exemption from requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.785(j), 25.795(b)(2), (c)(l) and (c)(3), 25.809(a), 25.810(a)(l) 25.857(e) , and 25.1447(c)(l), fo r the Boeing 767 - 2C all - cargo airplanes. The exemption , if granted, would allow main deck access during flight and the carriag e of eleven supernumeraries on the Boeing 767 - 2 C freighter. This request, which you submitted to the Department of Transportatio n’s Federal Docket Management S ys tem (FDMS), has be en given Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0956 . We are in the process of reviewing your request, and will contact you if we need additional information. A summary

of your petition will be published in the Federal Regi ster for public comment, in accordance with the requirements of § 11.85. You will be advised of the agency ’s decision on your petition as soon as possible. I f you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Alan Sinclair, ANM - 115 , at 425 - 227 - 2195 , or e - mail, Alan.Sinclair @faa.gov. Sincerel y, Michael Menkin Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
cpst_ex10.1.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
   
   
  
   
  	 
	1

	  

	 

   
  
   
    	 
	2

	  

	 


   
  
   
  	 
	3

	  

	 

   
  
   
    	 
	4

	  

	 


   
  
   
    	 
	5

	  

	 


   
  
   
    	 
	6

	  

	 


   
  
   
    	 
	7

	  

	 


   
  
   
    	 
	8

	  

	 


   
  
   
    	 
	9

	  

	 


   
  
   
    	 
	10

	  

	 


   
  
   
    	 
	11

	  

	 


   
  
   
  12
#### J. A. DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22623.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1943.

E. Garland Brown, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for.running a disorderly house, in which a fine of $200 was assessed.

Upon proper affidavit asking that the appeal be dismissed, the same is granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

1.yrns.w-,l ... TT LICENSING LLC 

P a1 

V. 3:22 CV 2148 N 

Civil Action No. 

ONEPLUS USA, CORP. 

Defendant 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

(This form also satisfies Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1) 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and LR 3.l(c), LR 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.l(a)(4)(D), and LR 81.2, 

Defendant OnePlus USA Corp. 

provides the following information: 

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state "None"): 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print. 

Defendant is a fully-owned subsidiary of Guangdong OnePlus Mobile Telecommunications Co., 

Ltd., a privately-held Chinese company. 

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are 

financially interested in the outcome of the case: 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print. 

At this time, Defendant is not aware of anyone other than the named parties or parties identified 

in their disclosures to the Court with a financial interest in the outcome of this case. 

Case 3:22-cv-02148-N Document 16 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 47
Date: 

Signature: 

Print Name: 

Bar Number: 

Address: 

City , State, Zip: 

Telephone: 

Fax: 

E-Mail: 

2022-01-09 

Everett Upshaw 

24025690 

1001 Belleview Street, Unit 608 

Dallas TX 75215 

(214) 680-6005 

(972) 920-8001 

everettupshaw@upshawpllc.com 

NOTE: To electronically file this document, you will find the event in our Case Management (CM/ECF) system, under Civil=> Other 

Documents => Certificate of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement. 

Case 3:22-cv-02148-N Document 16 Filed 01/09/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 48
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 686/2006

of 4 May 2006         

fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, are hereby fixed to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

----

ANNEX

REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 5 MAY 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pursuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2119

OSCAR L. SHAW,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS A. CHURDAR, PC Law Firm; DAVID T. RHENEY, Esq.

Attorney Nationwide; GARRISON HILL, Judge,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(6:09-cv-02149-HFF)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oscar L. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Mary A. Giorgi, Luanne Lambert 

Runge, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Oscar L. Shaw appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See Shaw v. Churdar, No. 6:09-cv-02149-

HFF (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED