alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### POTTER v. STATE.

No. 21416.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 5, 1941.

R. E. Eubank, of Paris, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The conviction is for a misdemeanor; the punishment, a fine of one hundred dollars.

The.record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of a statement of facts we are ' unable to determine whether the court was in error in refusing to submit to the jury appellant’s requested instructions.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 21839.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1942.

R. W. Webb, of Snyder, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is possessing intoxicating liquor in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the county jail for a period of nine months.

The complaint and information appear to be in proper form. The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. Section
1350



In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”)
by Nano Dimension Ltd. (the "Company"), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1)          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
March 7, 2017 | /s/ Amit Dror          
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Amit Dror              
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
Case 4:22-cv-00694-Y Document 1-4 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 14
Case 4:22-cv-00694-Y Document 1-4 Filed 08/12/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 15
Case 4:22-cv-00694-Y Document 1-4 Filed 08/12/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 16
Case 4:22-cv-00694-Y Document 1-4 Filed 08/12/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cv-00694-Y Document 1-4 Filed 08/12/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cv-00694-Y Document 1-4 Filed 08/12/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cv-00694-Y Document 1-4 Filed 08/12/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cr-00277-O Document 37 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 99
Case 4:22-cr-00277-O Document 37 Filed 11/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 100
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Guo Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
By:  /s/ Guo Yan Guo Yan  Chief Financial Officer   
 

 
November 14, 2006
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 6 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES R. JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 97-3185
v. D. Kansas WILLIAM L. CUMMINGS, Secretary of Corrections; BRUCE WELLS, Medical Doctor,

Defendants - Appellees. (D.C. No. 96-CV-3576)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before ANDERSON , HENRY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34 (a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

James R. Jones, an inmate at the Winfield Correctio nal Facility, appeals from the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, o f his civil rights action against various corrections personnel, pursuant to 42 U.S.C . § 1983. In his action Mr. Jones alleges that his Eighth Amendment right t o be free from cruel and unusual punishment has been violated because the de fendants refused, among other things, to operate on his hand. We have carefully reviewed the file and conclude th at the district court was correct, substantially for the reasons set forth inthe district court’s order filed May 19, 1997. We also conclude that this appeal fa ils to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for purposes of counting prior occasions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
# Official Journal L 215/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.215.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 215 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5314 August 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.215.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 215

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5314 August 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 25 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of head restraints (headrests), whether or not incorporated in vehicle seats | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 26 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their external projections | 27 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 25 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of head restraints (headrests), whether or not incorporated in vehicle seats

1

*

Regulation No 26 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their external projections

27

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
----

Action brought on 12 May 2006 — ECZG v Commission

(Case T-142/06)

(2006/C 178/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Elektrociepłownia Zielona Góra S.A. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: M. Powell, Solicitor, C. Arhold and K. Struckmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is a heat and power plant operator located in Poland. In the contested decision, the Commission decided to open a formal investigation procedure into alleged new State aid in the form of power purchase agreements concluded between power generators in Poland and the State owned network operator ‘PSE’ (1).

In support of its application, the applicant argues that the Commission had no jurisdiction to open a formal investigation procedure regarding aid measures granted before the accession of Poland to the European Union, which are not applicable after the date of accession. In doing so, the Commission violated the general legal principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations.

Furthermore, the applicant submits that the Commission has committed an error of law and of appreciation in classifying the measure as a new state aid. First, the Commission omitted to assess the measure in the light of the factual and legal circumstances existing at the time the agreements were concluded. Secondly, the Commission inadequately assessed the notion of economic advantage within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC by doing a global examination of all power purchase agreements instead of doing an individual examination. Thirdly, the Commission did not take into account the fact that, at the time the electricity markets of the Member States were opened to competition, the agreement concluded by the applicant could not distort competition in the common market as Poland was not yet a Member State. Finally, the applicant submits that the aid constitutes not new state aid, but existing aid according to both the Accession Treaty and the case law, by virtue of which aid already in application in a market closed to competition until its liberalisation is to be regarded as existing aid from the time of liberalisation. The applicant further states that the Commission did not examine whether the agreement in question was still in force after the Polish accession.

Finally, the applicant submits that the contested decision is inadequately reasoned and infringes Article 253 EC.

----

(1)  State aid — Poland — State aid No C 43/2005 (ex N 99/2005) — Polish Stranded Costs — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (OJ C 52, 2006, p. 8).

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1041 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1041

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to permit essential civilians 
 supporting military operations, in an overseas area designated by the 
 President, to mail at no cost letters or recorded communications of a 
                            personal nature.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

  Mrs. Byrne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to permit essential civilians 
 supporting military operations, in an overseas area designated by the 
 President, to mail at no cost letters or recorded communications of a 
                            personal nature.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN PERSONAL MAIL IN OVERSEAS MILITARY 
              THEATERS OF OPERATION.

    Section 3401(a)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or a civilian who otherwise is 
        authorized to use postal services at Armed Forces installations 
        and who the military theater commander designates as in support 
        of military operations,'' after ``a member of the Armed Forces 
        of the United States on active duty, as defined in section 101 
        (4) and (22) of title 10,'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``by the member''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ``or civilian'' after 
        ``the member''.

                                 <all>
```
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/15 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
# Official Journal C 181/29 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 181 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6329 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 181

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6329 May 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 181/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2020 to 30 April 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2020/C 181/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2020 to 30 April 2020(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 13 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 181/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2020 to 30 April 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2020/C 181/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2020 to 30 April 2020(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

13

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 227 (Friday, November 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29980]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Emergency 
Planning and Community Right to Know Act

    Pursuant to 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed 
consent decree embodying a settlement in United States v. Foster 
Poultry Farms, No. CIV 00-6869 OWW DLB, was lodged on November 1, 2000, 
with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
California.
    In a complaint filed concurrently with the lodging of the consent 
decree, the United States seeks penalties, pursuant to the Emergency 
Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), 42 U.S.C. 11045, 
alleging that the defendant failed to submit a Form R reporting that it 
manufactured, processed, or otherwise used various toxic chemicals for 
numerous facilities in California and Oregon.
    Under the proposed consent decree, the settling defendant has 
agreed to spend a minimum of $549,000 performing supplemental 
environmental projects, including the installation and operation of 
automated anhydrous ammonia leak detection devices at five of its 
facilities, and the installation and operation of an ammonia 
refrigeration valve control system at one of its facilities. Settling 
defendant has also agreed to pay a civil penalty in the amount of 
$125,000 within thirty days of the entry of the consent decree by the 
District Court.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, Box 7611 Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
D.C. 20044-7611, and should refer to United States v. Foster Poultry 
Farms, DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-06483.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, 1130 O 
Street, Fresno, California 93721. A copy of the proposed consent decree 
may also be obtained by mail from the Department of Justice Consent 
Decree Library, Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044-
7611. In requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and 
enclose a check in the amount of $4.75 (25 cents per page reproduction 
costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library. A copy of the decree, 
exclusive of the signature pages and the attachments, may be obtained 
for $3.50.

Walker Smith,
Principal Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, 
Environmental and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-29980 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# Official Journal L 12/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.012.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 12 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5415 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.012.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 12

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5415 January 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 313

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a technical correction in the enrollment of

S. 21.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 21) to

3 designate certain lands in the California desert as wilder4 ness, to establish Death Valley, Joshua Tree, and Mojave

5 National Parks, and for other purposes, the Secretary of

6 the Senate shall make the following correction:

7 In the second sentence of section 102(1), strike ‘‘fif8 teen’’ and insert ‘‘twenty’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00350

- CR

Spergel Polk

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1387106D )

May 12, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudder th

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth
#### SERVICE MUT. INS. CO. v. HELBERT.

No. 11079.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 23, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1942.

Scott & Wilson, of Waco, for appellant.

Collins, Jackson & Snodgrass, of San Angelo, for appellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The jury found that appellee, Roy Helbert, sustained injuries in the course of his employment with Alamo Freight Lines.

Appellant, Service Mutual Insurance Company of Texas, the insurance carrier, here asserts that there is no evidence sustaining the above finding.

It appears that appellee, when injured, was on his way to San Angelo-, Texas, for the purpose of moving his family and household effects from that City to San Antonio, Texas. While driving an automobile owned by a fellow employee, Strong, who accompanied him on the trip, appellee “must have dozed off or something” for the car turned over and appellee sustained serious injuries.

Appellee had worked for the Alamo Freight Lines on a run from San Angelo to McCamey until said run was discontinued, about February 14, 1940. Shortly thereafter, appellee went to work for the company as an extra man in San Antonio. Appellee testified that one of the officials of the company told him if he “was satisfied to move on down there”- — to San Antonio.

The day of the accident, appellee had requested his superior to “let him off” so that he and Strong could make the trip to San Angelo. This request was granted. Neither Strong nor appellee were to be paid by the company for the time spent on the San Angelo trip, and they received no instructions from the company with reference thereto.

We hold, as a matter o-f law, that there was no evidence supporting the jury’s finding which is here attacked. Article 8309, Section 1, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats.; Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Clark, 125 Tex. 96, 81 S.W.2d 67; Travelers’ Ins. Co. v. Santos, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 868; Marks’ Dependents v. Gray, 251 N.Y. 90, 167 N.E. 181.

The judgment appealed from is reversed, and judgment here rendered that appellee take nothing.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

____________________________________

:

CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., :

:

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-02377

:

v. :

: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNION HOME MORTGAGE CORP., :

:

Defendant. :

____________________________________:

JOINT DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR

Pursuant to this Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. 18), the Parties agree to mediate this 

dispute with Jeff Abrams, Esq. of Abrams Mediation and Arbitration. 

DATE: March 13, 2023 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andrew M. DeLucia (with permission)

Jason R. Elliott

Texas Bar No. 24050558

PERKINS COIE LLP

500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300

Dallas, TX 75201-3347

JElliott@perkinscoie.com

docketdal@perkinscoie.com

Tel: (214) 965-7723

Andrew M. DeLucia

Pa. Bar No. 91203

Benjamin S. Levine 

Pa. Bar No. 319495

Peter M. Nakonechni 

Pa. Bar No. 318350

RUBIN, FORTUNATO & HARBISON P.C.

1200 Liberty Ridge Drive, Suite 220

Case 3:22-cv-02377-K Document 21 Filed 03/13/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 112
2

Wayne, PA 19087

Tel: (610) 408-2025

adelucia@rubinfortunato.com

BLevine@rubinfortunato.com

PNakonechni@rubinfortunato.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.

and

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

By: /s/ Timothy E. Hudson

Timothy E. Hudson

State Bar No. 24046120

Tim.Hudson@btlaw.com

Jake Winslett

State Bar No. 24115961

Jake.Winslett@btlaw.com

Jenna Johnson

State Bar No. 24120928

Jenna.johnson@btlaw.com

2121 N. Pearl Street, Suite 700

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: 214-258-4200

Facsimile: 214-258-4199

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

UNION HOME MORTGAGE CORP.

Case 3:22-cv-02377-K Document 21 Filed 03/13/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 113
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 13, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

has been served upon counsel for all parties to this proceeding by PACER/ECF system. 

/s/ Timothy E. Hudson

Timothy E. Hudson

Case 3:22-cv-02377-K Document 21 Filed 03/13/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 114