alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
<CURRENCY>              U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,177
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          33,159
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     19,724
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             256
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               272
<LOANS>                                        322,157
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 386,175
<DEPOSITS>                                     292,216
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,699
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,669
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 386,175
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,841
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  336
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   297
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,474
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,347
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,833
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,641
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       38
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,100
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,371
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,371
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.84
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,043
<LOANS-PAST>                                       315
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,930
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,967
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,967
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00248-L

§

MARCEICE PICKENS (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

MARCEICE PICKENS is hereby adjudged guilty of 26 U.S.C. § 5841, 5845, and 5861(d), namely, Possession of an 

Unregistered Firearm. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 14th day of June, 2023.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00248-L Document 38 Filed 06/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 164
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 425

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the convening of the First Session of the One

Hundred Fourth Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the first regular session of the One Hundred Fourth

4 Congress shall begin at noon on Wednesday, January 4,

5 1995.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 425

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the convening of the First Session of

the One Hundred Fourth Congress.
# L_2006316EN.01003501.xml

| 16.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/35

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 584/2006 of 10 April 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs (dynamic random access memories) originating in the Republic of Korea

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 103 of 12 April 2006
  )

Official Journal of the European Union L 103 of 12 April 2006

On page 25, in Nos 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the table in Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003:

for:

‘Multi-combinational forms of DRAMs ...’,

read:

‘(Non-customised) multi-combinational forms of DRAMs ...’;

and in Nos 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the table in Article 1(3), of Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003:

for:

‘... price of the multi-combinational form of DRAM’,

read:

‘... price of the (non-customised) multi-combinational form of DRAM’.

---
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Medina, Dayana

Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 3:59 PM

To: pettyjohn@adeq.state.ar.us

Cc: Donaldson, Guy; Feldman, Michael

Subject: Region 6 response on Georgia-Pacific Crossett Mill

Hi Mary,  

We appreciate the opportunity to review the April 1, 2013, letter sent to ADEQ by James Cutbirth from the Georgia‐

Pacific Crossett Mill. We have reviewed the additional information provided and believe that the technical analysis

presented in the letter and the spreadsheets and other attachments included in Mr. Cutbirth’s April 1, 2013 email,

demonstrate that the actual SO2, PM, and NOx emissions from the 6A and 9A boilers during the 2001‐2003 baseline

period are below the emission rates modeled by Georgia Pacific in its 2011 BART screening CALPUFF modeling. We

believe that Georgia‐Pacific’s analysis, which compares the modeled emission rates with estimates of 2001‐2003

maximum 24‐hour emission rates that were calculated based on daily fuel usage and EPA’s AP‐42 emission factors, and

other newly provided information allow for a more accurate assessment of whether or not the 6A and 9A boilers are

subject to BART. Based on this newly provided information, we believe the 6A and 9A boilers are not subject to BART

and therefore it is not necessary for Georgia‐Pacific to submit a BART five factor analysis. Please inform Region 6

whether ADEQ concurs with our assessment or if you would like to discuss this matter further. If ADEQ concurs with

Region 6, please ensure that when you submit the Arkansas Regional Haze SIP revision, the SIP submittal includes the

BART screening CALPUFF modeling files for the Georgia‐Pacific Crossett Mill, as well as a copy of Mr. Cutbirth’s April 1,

2013, letter and the spreadsheets and other attachments provided in Mr. Cutbirth’s April 1, 2013 email.  

Thank you,  

Dayana Medina

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division

Air Planning Section (6PD‐L)

214‐665‐7241

medina.dayana@epa.gov
Case 4:22-cr-00176-P Document 73 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 261
Case 4:22-cr-00176-P Document 73 Filed 11/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 262
# Official Journal L 323/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 323 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 635 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 323

English edition

Legislation

Volume 635 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2020 of the Joint Committee on Agriculture of 31 July 2020 on amending Annex 12 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products [2020/1386] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2020 of the Joint Committee on Agriculture of 31 July 2020 on amending Annex 12 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products [2020/1386]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# FILED June 19, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON JUNE 1997 SESSION

JOHNNY SMITH, JR. , ) ) C.C.A. No. 02C01-9608- CR-00287 Appellant, ) ) Shelby County V. ) ) Honorable Chris Cra ft, Judge ) STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) (Post-Convicti on) ) Appellee. )

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: Johnny Smith, Jr., Pro Se Charles W. Burson Reg. No. 12232-076 Attorney General & Reporter F.C.I. Memphis P.O. Box 34550 (Beale-B) Janis L. Turner Memphis, TN 38184-0550 Counsel for the State 450 James Robertson Parkwa y Nashville, TN 37243-0493 William L. Gibbons District Attorney General Daniel R. Moody Assistant District A

ttorney General Criminal Justice Comple x, Suite 301 201 Poplar Avenue Memphis, TN 38103
OPINION FILED: ___________________ AFFIRMED PAUL G. SUMM ERS, Judge-2- O P I N I O N In 1987 the appellant, Johnny Smi th, Jr., pled guilty to the unlawful possession of marijuana wi th intent to sell and conv icted felon carrying a firearm. In 1996 he filed a petition for post-conviction relief, ap proximately nine years after his convictions bec ame final. The trial court dis missed the petition on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations.
When appellant’s convictions became final, t he law allowed thre e years to file a petition for post-conv iction relief. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-102 (1990). The appellant's time period for filing his petition expired in 1990 . Therefore, his petition is time barred. Accordingly, we find no error of law mandating reversal. The trial court's dismissal of the petition is affirmed in accordance with Tenn. R. Ct. Crim. App., Rule 20.

__________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, Ju dge CONCUR:

____________________________ DAVID H. W ELLES, Judge

____________________________ JOE G. RILEY, Judge
Case 3:22-cv-02060-B Document 24 Filed 11/30/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID 87
Case 3:22-cv-02060-B Document 24 Filed 11/30/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID 88
Case 3:22-cv-02060-B Document 24 Filed 11/30/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID 89
Case 3:22-cv-02060-B Document 24 Filed 11/30/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID 90
Case 3:22-cv-02060-B Document 24 Filed 11/30/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID 91
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
    GOLD INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
    REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD  ENDING JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
    ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                                             2,600
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  4,467,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                    5,897,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              11,057,591
<PP&E>                                                         6,298,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 4,233,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                13,890,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          3,057,686
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                       7,182,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     3,650,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  13,890,669
<SALES>                                                       20,320,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              20,320,979
<CGS>                                                         14,870,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 14,870,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               4,165,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               116,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                1,167,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     466,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              701,956
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     701,956
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        .21



</TABLE>
No. ___________

In the

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

______________________________________

On Appeal from the 130th Judicial District Court of

Matagorda County, Texas

Cause Number 13-094; and the 

Opinion of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals

in Cause Number 13-13-00328-CR, Delivered July 23, 2015

______________________________________

FRANK LARA, JR.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

_____________________________________

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

PRO SE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

______________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL 

APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Kristen Jernigan, the undersigned attorney of record for 

Frank Lara, Jr., the Appellant, herein, and files this Motion for Extension of Time 

to File Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. As set out below, the undersigned 

respectfully requests a sixty-day extension so that Appellant can file his Pro Se

Petition for Discretionary Review. In support of said motion, the undersigned

would show the Court the following:

1. Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is currently due in this 

case on July 24, 2015.

PD-0968-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/27/2015 1:05:46 PM

Accepted 7/28/2015 3:10:28 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2. Appellant seeks an extension of sixty days in which to file his Petition 

for Discretionary Review, making his Petition due on or before October 26, 2015.

3. The undersigned counsel will not be representing Appellant after the 

filing of this motion. Appellant will now have to obtain and review the record in 

order to prepare and file a Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. The 

undersigned believes that there is insufficient time between now and July 24, 2015, 

to accomplish those goals. Consequently, the undersigned respectfully requests 

that the Court grant Appellant the additional time.

4. The undersigned has not filed any previous motions for extension of 

time in this case.

5. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully requests 

that Appellant be granted an extension of sixty days so that his petition for 

discretionary review in this case will now be due on October 26, 2015.

PRAYER

 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned

respectfully requests that this Court grant this Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review.

Respectfully submitted,

_______/s/__Kristen Jernigan______

KRISTEN JERNIGAN

State Bar Number 90001898

207 S. Austin Ave.

Georgetown, Texas 78626

(512) 904-0123

(512) 931-3650 (fax)

Kristen@txcrimapp.com
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time has been mailed to the 

Matagorda County District Attorney’s Office c/o Robinson C. Ramsey, attorney of 

record for the State, Trinity Plaza II Suite 900, 745 E Mulberry Ave., Ste 900, San 

Antonio, Texas 78212-3141, on July 27, 2015.

__/s/ Kristen Jernigan__________________

Kristen Jernigan
EPA DR #4073 

Received: July 6, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8204.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 27, 2000.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     PTC23 AFR-TC3 0108 dated 10 October 2000, TC23/TC123 Africa-TC3 Resolutions r1-r43, PTC23 AFR-TC3 0110 dated 20 October 2000, Technical Correction, Minutes—PTC23 AFR-TC3 0109 dated 20 October 2000, Tables—PTC23 AFR-TC3 FARES 0048 dated 20 October 2000, Intended effective date: 1 April 2001.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8205.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 27, 2000.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     PTC23 ME-TC3 0104 dated 3 October 2000, TC23/TC123 Middle East-TC3 Resolutions r1-r52, Minutes—PTC23 ME-TC3 0105 dated 27 October 2000, Tables—PTC23 ME-TC3 FARES 0045 dated 10 October 2000, Intended effective date: 1 April 2001.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8208.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 27, 2000.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     PTC1 0166 dated 27 October 2000, Mail Vote 092—Resolution 010k, TC1 Caribbean Special Passenger Amending Resolution, Intended effective date: 15 November 2000.                 

Dorothy Y. Beard, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-29236 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P