alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Quarterly Report of TN-K Energy Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ken Page, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.Dated: May 13, 2010

/s/ Ken Page

Ken Page, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 2, 2016

CONTACT: Rob Friedlander, Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 2, 2016

WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. Lew today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in an executive session at the Treasury 

Department.

During the meeting, the Council received an update and had a discussion regarding recent market 

developments. The Council also received an update from staff and held a discussion about the 

Council’s 2016 annual report, which is expected to be published this spring.

The Council discussed its annual review of its designation of MetLife, Inc. for enhanced 

prudential standards and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System. The Council designated MetLife in December 2014, and notified the company of its 

annual review in October 2015. As part of the annual review process, the company was invited 

to meet with staff to discuss the review and to submit information regarding any change that the 

company deemed relevant to the threat the company could pose to financial stability. Staff of 

Council members and member agencies considered information submitted by the company and 

consulted with certain of the company’s regulators.

Following a discussion of recent developments at the company, the Council voted not to rescind 

the designation of MetLife. The Council provided the company and its lead state insurance 

regulator with a notice explaining the primary bases for the Council’s decision not to rescind the 

designation. The notice addresses the material factors raised by the company in its submission to 

the Council contesting the determination during the annual reevaluation. As a general matter, if 

the Council determines in an annual review that a company has addressed the key factors in the 

Council’s basis for its designation, the Council would rescind the designation.

The Council also discussed its ongoing assessment of potential risks to U.S. financial stability 

from asset management products and activities. The Council continued its discussion of
regulations, industry practices, and proposed rulemakings that could mitigate such potential 

risks.

Finally, the Council voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on January 28.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved meeting 

minutes are available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

###
# C_2014202EN.01002301.xml

| 30.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 6 May 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission

(Case T-103/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - Alcohol and spirits - Cancellation of a tax debt in a collective bankruptcy procedure - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of any urgency - Prima facie case not made out))

2014/C 202/29

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Frucona Košice a.s. (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: K. Lasok QC, B. Hartnett and J. Holmes, Barristers, and O. Geiss, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Walkerová and L. Armati, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2013) 6261 final of 16 October 2013 on State aid SA.18211 (C 25/2005) (ex NN 21/2005), implemented by the Slovak Republic for Frucona Košice a.s., in so far as it orders the Slovak Republic to recover the aid.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

---
Case 2:22-cr-00092-Z-BR Document 32 Filed 12/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 77
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3425 — NORDIC CAPITAL / TRENOR)

(2004/C 175/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
United States District Court 

Northern District of Texas 

Dear Clerk: 

Enclosed is a certified copy of an Order and/or Judgment remanding the above captioned 

case back to the , 

along with a copy of the docket sheet. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at .

Karen Mitchell 

Clerk of Court

RE:

Style:

Sincerely, 

Karen Mitchell, Clerk

By:

cc:

Enclosure

&RXQVHORI5HFRUG

&DVHILOHSXEOLFHQWU\

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

'HSXW\&OHUN

Dallas Division

8/19/2022

County Court at Law No. 1 

George L. Allen, Sr. Courts Building 

600 Commerce Street 

Dallas, TX 75202

3:22-cv-1782-M, Remand Order

 Does 1-9 et al v. Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Inc et al

County Court at Law No. 1 of Dallas County, TX CC-22-03989-A

214-753-2633

s/A. Lowe

Order and Docket Sheet

Case 3:22-cv-01782-M Document 33-1 Filed 08/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1066
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Guo
Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:   /s/ Guo Yan             Guo Yan
             Chief Financial Officer May 10 , 2006
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 538 Filed 09/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2142
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 538 Filed 09/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2143
[ Sanitized 

nECEJ\lf~[J 

OPPT CBIC 

2016 MAR - I PM 12: 25 

I 

B 

.EMO 

I 

I 

CBIC Control Number 

EPA Docket Center 

Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0225 

Attention: Tyler Edward Lloyd 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

WJC East; Room 6428 

Washington, DC 20004-3302 

2/26/2016 

Dear Mr. Lloyd, 

This is in responding to your E-mail request for additional information on EMD use of 

LCPFAC or PFAS chemicals dated February 11, 2016. Our response to your three 

questions are below: 

(]) The specific chemical(s) (CAS #)you have indicated have ongoing uses 

EMD Performance Materials Corp. uses following three LCPFAC or PFAS chemicals 

in products currently: 

1. Tetramethylammonium perfluorooctanoate (CAS 32609-65-7) 

2. 

3. 

(2) The specific uses of those chemical(s), beyond what has already been supplied, if 

possible 

368326-S 

The use of those chemicals are microelectronic processing chemicals as indicated in the 

submitted comments 

(3) Any supporting documentation (such as an SDS, etc.) showing the ongoing use of 

those chemical(s) 

Included, please find SDSs for AZ Aquatar Coating (contains chemical#!), and AZ 

125nXT-IOA Photoresist (contains chemical #2). The contents ofchemical #3 in our 

products are minimal and below the SDS listing concentration as required by OSHA 

Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200(g)). 

Sincerely Yours, 

ElvlD Perfunnance lvlaterials Corp. 

70 lvkister Ave. Somerville, NJ 08876 

Phone 908 429-3500 

Fax 908 429-3636 

www.emdgroup.com 
--f~[c_;,/f,u f~r1j' 

Hong Zhuang, Ph'J:i. 

EHS - Product Safety Coodinator 

EMD Performance Materials Corp.170 Meister Avenue I Somerville, NJ 088761 USA 

Phone: +I 908-429-3638 I Mobile: +I 908-947-8227 I Fax: +I 908-429-5982 

E-mail: hong.zhuang@emdgroup.com lwww.emd-pm.com 

EMD Perfmmance Materials Corp. is a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany 

EHS - Senior Scientist 

EMD Performance Materials Corp. I 70 Meister Avenue I Somerville, NJ 08876 I USA 

Phone: +I 908-429-3586 I Mobile:+ I 908-285-5061 I Fax:+ I 908-429-5982 

E-mail:John.DiCarlo@emdgroup.comlwww.emd-pm.com 

EMD Performance Materials Corp. is a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Datmstadt, Germany 

EMO Perfonnance Materials Corp. 

70 Meister Ave. Somerville, N J 08876 

Phone 908 429-3500 

Fax 908 429-3636 

www.cmdgwup.com
Order filed June 25, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00288

- CR

____________ KENYATTA WESLEY FRED ERICK , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 413th Judicial District

Johnson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F46217



### ORDER The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed March 18, 2013

. A relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the motion for new trial filed March 19, 2013.

The Johnson County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk = s record on or before July 8, 2013 , containing the motion for new trial filed March 19, 2013.

### If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 124/2006

of 25 January 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 January 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 25 January 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-807]


Polyethelene Terephthalate, Film, Sheet, and Strip From Korea; 
Postponement of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review

AGENCY:  Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce

ACTION:  Notice of extension of time limit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for the preliminary results of the administrative review of 
the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 
and strip from Korea. The review of the antidumping duty order on 
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip from Korea. The 
review covers three manufacturers/exporters of the subject merchandise 
and the period June 1, 1998 through May 31, 1999.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, 
Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 
(202) 482-4475 or 482-0649, respectively.

Postponement of Preliminary Results of Review

    On July 29, 1999, the Department initiated this administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate 
film, sheet, and strip from Korea. (64 FR 41075). The current deadline 
for the preliminary results is February 29, 2000. We determine that it 
is not practicable to complete this review within the original time 
frame. (See Memorandum to Joseph A. Spetrini dated February 3, 2000.)
    Accordingly, the deadline for issuing the preliminary results of 
this review is now no later than May 1, 2000. The deadline for issuing 
the final results of this review will be no later than 120 days from 
the publication of the preliminary results.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675 (a)(3)(A)).

    Dated: February 3, 2000.
Richard Weible,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III.
[FR Doc. 00-2976 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3519-DS-M
Case 4:22-cr-00310-O Document 26 Filed 12/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 52
Case 4:22-cr-00310-O Document 26 Filed 12/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 53
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 401

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the months of March 1995 and March 1996

as ‘‘Irish-American Heritage Month’’.

Whereas 150 years ago, the blight that struck Ireland’s potato crop (‘‘the single root that changed the history of

the world’’), known as the Great Famine, caused

2,000,000 of Ireland’s population to emigrate, mostly to

America’s shores;

Whereas in 1847 alone, 25,000 Irish immigrants arrived in

Boston;
2

•HJ 401 RDS

Whereas by 1851, the end of the famine exodus, 1,712 emigrant ships had sailed up the Narrows into New York

harbor;

Whereas during the ‘‘Great Hunger’’ (1845–1851) more people left Ireland than had emigrated in the previous 250

years;

Whereas within a few years of their arrival in the United

States, these Irish immigrants took jobs as laborers, built

railroads, canals, and schools, dedicated themselves to

help build this Nation, and this same legacy remains a

part of today’s American mainstream;

Whereas James Smith, George Taylor, Matthew Thornton,

and Charles Thomson, 4 of the individuals who signed

the Declaration of Independence, were Irish born and 9

other signers were of Irish ancestry;

Whereas Irish-born James Hoban designed and supervised

the building of the White House and its restoration after

it was burned in 1814;

Whereas more than 200 Irish-Americans have been awarded

the Congressional Medal of Honor;

Whereas 19 Presidents of the United States proudly claim

Irish heritage, included among them, the first President,

George Washington;

Whereas John W. O’Beirne, Founder of the American Foundation for Irish Heritage, first requested in 1990 that

Congress designate March as ‘‘Irish-American Heritage

Month’’; and

Whereas the 44,000,000 Americans of Irish ancestry, like

their forebearers, continue to enrich all aspects of life in

the United States, in science, education, art, agriculture,
3

•HJ 401 RDS

business, industry, literature, music, athletics, military

and governmental service: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the months of March 1995 and March 1996 are des4 ignated as ‘‘Irish-American Heritage Month’’. The Presi5 dent is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation

6 calling upon the people of the United States to observe

7 these months with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives September 30,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 6 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 6

  Designating April 9, 1993, and April 9, 1994, as ``National Former 
                   Prisoner of War Recognition Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Applegate introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating April 9, 1993, and April 9, 1994, as ``National Former 
                   Prisoner of War Recognition Day''.

Whereas the United States has fought in many wars;
Whereas thousands of members of the armed forces of the United States who served 
        in such wars were captured by the enemy and held as prisoners of war;
Whereas many such prisoners of war were subjected to brutal and inhumane 
        treatment by their captors in violation of international codes and 
        customs for the treatment of prisoners of war and died, or were 
        disabled, as a result of such treatment; and
Whereas the great sacrifices of such prisoners of war and their families deserve 
        national recognition: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That April 9, 1993, and April 
9, 1994, is designated as ``National Former Prisoner of War Recognition 
Day'' in honor of the members of the armed forces of the United States 
who have been held as prisoners of war, and the President is authorized 
and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the 
United States to commemorate such day with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: March 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 43)]
[Notices]               
[Page 10340-10341]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05mr10-148]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending February 6, 2010

    The following applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.).
    The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to 
Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the 
Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. 
Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a 
tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further 
proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0029.
    Date Filed: February 2, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: February 23, 2010.
    Description: Application of Perimeter Aviation LP as represented by 
its general partner Perimeter Aviation GP Inc. c/o/b Perimeter Aviation 
requesting an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit to engage in 
charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail: (1) 
Between any points in Canada and any point or points in the United 
States; (2) between any point or points in the United States and any 
point or points in a third country or countries, provided that, except 
with respect to cargo charters, such service constitutes part of a 
continuous operation, with or without a change of aircraft, that 
includes service to Canada for the purpose of carrying local traffic 
between

[[Page 10341]]

Canada and the United States; and (3) other charter operations.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-4673 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### LEADON et al. v. STATE.

No. 21210.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1940.

H. H. Wellborn, of Henderson, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellants were convicted of the theft of cattle, and their punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary each.

This cause comes before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The motion for a new trial contains many matters alleged to be errors committed by the trial court, which we are unable to correctly appraise on account of the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exceptions.

The indictment appears to be in proper form, and all proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.