alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $ )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $

1 ' + *7 3' 1 ')0 )8 )9 : ' 3 8
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $ !

; ' < => ?' @ A B C D @ E @ A C F G H E @ D H I E C J C E E K F @ A B

E K H K A A @ E G G L M A K H G H L A B N 6# N K E O . C D M @ A @ A .

A C F G H B I K P I . . G I K O B A K K Q L G . C G R R @ . C A J G H @ P K
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3925

_____________________________ S HEBEYONNE L ATRICE G ARNER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

. May 21, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Genera l, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Case 4:22-mj-00866-BP Document 14 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 13
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 59

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

that Federal judges be reconfirmed by the Senate every 10 years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. FIELDS of Texas introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide that Federal judges be reconfirmed

by the Senate every 10 years.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 59 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 1 of article III of this Con5 stitution, a judge or justice of a court created under that

6 article shall not continue in office, except with the consent

7 of the Senate, given within the first 365 days at the begin8 ning of each successive 10-year period after the judge or

9 justice first takes office. For the purposes of this article

10 of amendment, a judge or justice who first took office be11 fore the adoption of this article shall be deemed to have

12 first taken office on the date of such adoption.’’.

Æ
#### BARNES v. STATE.

No. 21764.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 22, 1941.

R. Matt Dawson, of Longview, for appellant.

*851Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for life by reason of enhanced punishment under the provisions of Art. 63 P.C.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of exception, the indictment is sufficient to support the judgment of conviction and the punishment assessed.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2019*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 61.64

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT ** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 10/15 38.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 10/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 10/15 16.00 0.00 24.00 54.00

5-year TIPS 10/31 17.00 0.00

2-year note 10/31 40.00 0.00

2-year FRN 10/31 20.00 0.00

5-year note 10/31 41.00 0.00

7-year note 10/31 32.00 0.00 116.34 33.66

3-year Note 11/15 38.00 0.00

10-year Note 11/15 27.00 0.00

30-year Bond 11/15 19.00 0.00 60.52 23.48

10-year TIPS (r) 11/29 12.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 11/29 18.00 0.00 0.00 30.00

2-year note 12/2 40.00 0.00

5-year note 12/2 41.00 0.00

7-year note 12/2 32.00 0.00 82.44 30.56

3-year Note 12/16 38.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 12/16 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 12/16 16.00 0.00 24.00 54.00

2-year FRN (r) 12/27 18.00 0.00 0.00 18.00

5-year TIPS (r) 12/31 15.00 0.00

2-year note 12/31 40.00 0.00

5-year note 12/31 41.00 0.00

7-year note 12/31 32.00 0.00 81.35 46.65

679.00 388.64 290.36

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 352

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 10/21/2019 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.
Plaintiffs, 

v. 

STOUT RISIUS ROSS LLC., 

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 3:22-MC-00068-N 

ORDER GRANTING 

AGREED MOTION TO TRANSFER MOTION TO COMPEL TO THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties’ Agreed Motion to Transfer Motion 

to Compel to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“Motion”). The

Court, having reviewed the file, and being otherwise duly advised of the premises, the Motion is 

hereby GRANTED. The Court ORDERS that the Motion to Compel (Dkt. Nos. 1-4) is transferred

to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas for consideration. 

SIGNED AND ENTERED this 31st day of August, 2022. 

__________________________________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AGREED:

By: /s/ M. Scott Stevens 

M. Scott Stevens (NC Bar No. 37828)

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

101 S. Tryon Street; Suite 4000

Charlotte, North Carolina 28280

Phone: (704) 444-1000

Fax: (704) 444-1935

scott.stevens@alston.com

Counsel for Nokia Corp., Nokia Solutions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

NOKIA CORP., et al., 

Case 3:22-mc-00068-N-BT Document 7 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 287
By: /s/ William E. Davis, III

William E. Davis, III 

Texas State Bar No. 24047416 

bdavis@davisfirm.com 

THE DAVIS FIRM, PC

213 N. Fredonia Street, Suite 230 

Longview, Texas 75601 

Telephone: (903) 230-9090 

Facsimile: (903) 230-9661 

Counsel for Stout Risius Ross, LLC 

Case 3:22-mc-00068-N-BT Document 7 Filed 08/31/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 288
#### MOTOR FINANCE CO. OF TEXAS et al. v. ALLEN.

*No.*4798.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Oct. 23, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 3, 1952.

S. D. Bennett, J. S. Maida Jr., Beaumont, for appellant.

Walley & Ro'bichau, Beaumont, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee against appellants for $1,680 for actual and exemplary damages for the conversion by them of his automobile. Ap-pellee owed some *money to*Motor Finance Company of Texas for the purchase price of his car. He owed two notes, one secured by a chattel (mortgage, one -unsecured. When the unsecured one was in default, appellants took possession of the car in the absence of appellee. The jury found that such taking amounted to conversion, and the proof supported the finding.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellants’ motion •for continuance. See Cain v. Farris, Tex. 'Civ.App., 212 S.W.2d 250. The application was defective under Rule 252, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. No reversible error is shown in the trial court’s permitting -appel-lee to testify to the market value of his car. Pacific Finance Corp. v. Gilkerson, Tex.Civ.App., 217 S.W.2d 440. The trial court did not err in overruling motion for instructed verdict and motion for new trial, as the evidence supports the verdict that the taking of the car was without legal authority, and was malicious. There was sufficient evidence in the case to warrant submission to the jury of Special Issue N-o. 4, which inquired whether defendants below acted with malice.

Affirmed.
# Official Journal L 83/23 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5023 March 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 83

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5023 March 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 294/2007 of 20 February 2007 establishing for 2006 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91
   (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 294/2007 of 20 February 2007 establishing for 2006 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91
   (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69895-69896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29776]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 215

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Profit Policy

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Director of Defense Procurement is sponsoring a public 
meeting to discuss the proposed Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) rule on changes to profit policy published in the 
Federal Register at 65 FR 45574 on July 24, 2000. The Director of 
Defense Procurement would like to hear the views of interested parties 
on what they believe to be the key issues pertaining to the proposed 
rule and potential alternatives. A listing of some of the possible 
issues is included on the Internet Home Page of the Office of Cost, 
Pricing, and Finance at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dp/cpf.
    Subsequent to the discussions at the public meeting, the Director 
of Defense Procurement intends to publish a revised proposed rule for 
additional public comment.

DATES: The public meeting will be conducted at the address shown below 
on December 12, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., local time.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be conducted at Crystal Square 4, 
Suite

[[Page 69896]]

200A, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Bemben, Office of Cost, Pricing, 
and Finance, by telephone at (703) 695-9764; by FAX at (703) 693-9616; 
or by e-mail at [email protected].

Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
[FR Doc. 00-29776 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0203

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DION CURTIS GRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 12, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2024

01/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0203
Dana W. Clarke Jr.

5900 Eastview

N. Ridgeville OH 44039

(440)610-4292

service@flybyvideopros@gmail.com

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Petition for Exemption/Rulemaking

To whom it may concern,

FLY BY VIDEO PROS LLC (FBVP) respectfully requests an exemption from

several provisions of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) to

permit the use of small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) to assist Real Estate

Agents in making video of homes and property for sale, and to also provide

demonstrations for retail sales, raise awareness, teach consumers about

safety concerns, and Laws concerning sUAS. As of 10/27/14, we are Licensed

in the State of Ohio to conduct business, as we are an Authorized Dealer for

manufacturer of sUAS, DJI. Please see State of Ohio Certificate, (attached)

This request is motivated primarily by the desire to demonstrate and sell DJI

products, as well as making commercial video and photography, on private

property for profit with permission of domestic/commercial property owners.

While an exemption would not eliminate the current need for in-person

visual inspection required by various federal regulatory departments, it

would allow FBVP to conduct operations with sUAS, under 300 ft.

Accordingly, the grant of an exemption is consistent with Congress’ intent,

reflected in Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(Modernization Act), that safe systems be permitted in the national airspace

prior to the issuance of final regulations governing general use of these

systems.

Granting an Exemption will not Adversely Affect Safety

FBVP operates within the appropriate standard for model aircraft, conducted

for recreational purposes. FBVP operations fall completely within the

allowable operations for model aircraft.

Sincerely,

Dana W. Clarke Jr.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:  March 10, 2005
                                      By:    /s/ BRIAN H. STROM
                                      ----------------------------
                                           Brian H. Strom,
                                         President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SureWest Communications and will be retained by SureWest
Communications and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH   CORPORATION   CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS  OF
SEPTEMBER  30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                   JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         62,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           1,361
<INVENTORY>                                                          284,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     350,594
<PP&E>                                                             1,085,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       427,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     1,307,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                313,234
<BONDS>                                                              349,800
<COMMON>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           176,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       1,307,547
<SALES>                                                              297,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     297,717
<CGS>                                                                252,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        287,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     9,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        2,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    1,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           1,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 225/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 225 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6229 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 225

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6229 August 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1379 of 28 August 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China as extended to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in these countries or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) No 2016/1036 | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1379 of 28 August 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China as extended to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in these countries or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) No 2016/1036

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.