alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Taitron Components Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1 ) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 16, 2011


/s/ Stewart Wang


Stewart Wang


Chief Executive Officer and President


(Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ David Vanderhorst


David Vanderhorst


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


(Principal Financial Officer)
#### LANE-WELLS COMPANY, Appellant, v. AUSTIN BRIDGE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3858.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

May 8, 1941.

Rehearing Denied May 29, 1941.

George Red, of Houston, for appellant.

Wood, Morrow, Gresham & McCorquo-dale, of Houston, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This appeal was prosecuted from the County Court at Law of Harris county to the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals, and transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court. An examination of the briefs discloses no error. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed without written opinion. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Using Human 
Pluripotent Stem Cells; Correction

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institutes of Health published in the Federal 
Register on August 25, 2000, the final National Institutes of Health 
Guidelines for Research Using Human Pluripotent Stem Cells (65 FR 
51976). The final Guidelines contained incorrect citations and other 
errors. The final Guidelines, with the corrections made in this notice, 
are available on the NIH stem cell information web site at:(http://www.nih.gov/news/stemcell/index.htm). For additional information on 
human pluripotent stem cells, refer to this web site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: NIH Office of Science Policy, 
Attention: HPSCRG, Building 1, Room 218, MSC 0166, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7741 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#582b2c3d353b3d3434183539313476363130763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e99a9d8c848a8c8585a984888085c7878081c78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>.

Corrections

    1. In Section II.A.2.d of the Guidelines (65 FR 51980, first 
column), change ``human pluripotent stem cells,'' at the end of the 
section, to ``embryo.''
    2. In Section II.B.1.a. of the Guidelines (65 FR 51980, second 
column), change ``Section II.A.2'' to ``Section II.B.2.''
    3. In Section II.B.2.a. of the Guidelines (65 FR 51980, third 
column), add the following at the end of the section: ``and with 42 
U.S.C. Sec. 289g-2(b).''
    4. In Section IV.B. of the Guidelines (65 FR 51981, first column), 
change ``applications shall'' in the first sentence to ``documentation 
of compliance with the Guidelines will'' and insert after ``by HPSCRG 
and'' the words, ``all applications will be reviewed''.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
Ruth L. Kirschstein,
Principal Deputy Director, NIH.
[FR Doc. 00-29791 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
!
"#
	!   $$$
$%&%'%()%*$+(,$+'%-%'%./)+()%0%,$$12%*345(*5')5()%'(*'%6+',4(63-%)+()%00+345(5&3-%*%!
"#,74(4*3'+348%%+*2'%**-520,.%+,,'%**%,353-%+9904)+.0%5' 
484*45($
$,,4345(+09%'*5((%0624,+()%'%6+',4(63-%4790%7%(3+345(5&'%&%'%()%$:400.%92.04*-%, $$

+84,+'+3+;577+(,%';%'*5((%0%'84)%%(3%';*%(,*$$(3%'(%3'%0%+*%(53+23-5'4<%,$

Exhibit 1

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 68-1 Filed 02/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1452
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

*Name*: Seminar: “RESEARCH TO DEVELOP AN ARTIFICIAL RETINA”.                

*Date and Time*: November 22, 2000; 8:30 am-12 noon.                

*Place*: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 110, Arlington, VA 22230.                

*Type of Meeting*: Open.                

*Contact Person*: Gilbert Devey, Program Director, biomedical Engineering and Research to Aid Persons with Disabilities, Division of Bioengineering and Environmental Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 2223, Telephone: (703) 292-8320.                

*Purpose of Meeting*: The broad purpose of the meeting is to brief NSF management and program officers on federal agency research project support, other worldwide R&D directed to the development of a chronic retinal prosthesis, and to indicate the context in which NSF provides support for the research.                

### **Agenda**

8:30 a.m.—Registration

9:00 a.m.—Welcome

9:15 a.m.—Presentation

10:15 a.m.—Break

10:30 a.m.—Discussion

11:30 a.m.—Open Discussion

11:45 a.m.—Wrap-Up

Dated: November 8, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-29170 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135913 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135913 COA: 279413 Bay CC: 03-010564-FC LESELIE MCDONALD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 7, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7312

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALPHONSO A. WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-35-ST-MU, CA-01-17-1-5-MU) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alphonso A. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alphonso A. Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wright , Nos. CR-91-35-ST-MU; CA-01-17-1-5- MU (W.D.N.C. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as theChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: July 30, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham    |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                     |   | Steven C. Oldham,       |
|                     |   | President and           |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qand shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
Insurance and Infrastructure Investing

May 11, 2017

Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance 

John Tanyeri, VP and Head of Infrastructure/Project Finance
• MetLife Investments Overview

• MetLife’s Global Infrastructure Debt Portfolio

• MetLife’s Public Private Partnership (PPP) Overview

• Key Takeaways

Agenda
3

MetLife Investments Overview

 Investing for 100+ years

 Stable, experienced 

management

 Prudent risk management 

culture

 MetLife, Inc. is ranked #40

in the Fortune 500®

Experience Reach Relationships Scale

 Market knowledge

 Local participants

 Opportunities

 MetLife, Inc. serves 

approximately 100 million 

customers in nearly 50 

countries

 Investors

 Borrowers

 Lenders

 Intermediaries

 Partners

 $558.9 billion in combined 

managed assets

 Leverages experienced 

850+ person team

 Broad capabilities in all 

major asset classes

YEARS

100+

We are a debt, as opposed to equity investor, for the most part, and long-term 

infrastructure debt is a good match for our long-term liabilities. 
MetLife’s Global Infrastructure Debt Portfolio

• Manage $43.7 billion in infrastructure debt investments1

43%

37%

13%

4% 3%

Privates

Public Corporates

Municipal

Emerging Markets

High Yield & Bank Loans

50%

16%

10%

9%

9%

6%

Utilities – Electric & Gas

Transportation Services

Utilities - Water

Pipelines / Energy

Railroads

Other

Asset Class Sector

As of December 31, 2016.

1Includes $41.2 billion general account and $2.5 billion of third party managed accounts (MetLife Investment Management).

4
• PPPs involve contractual agreement between public agency and private-sector entities for 

delivery of facility or service for public use

• Growing U.S. momentum: 2016 was a record year with $10 billion of PPP investments1 

Utilizing U.S. Public Private Partnership (PPP) 

Market

• Provides alternative to taxpayer 

financing for states and local authorities

• Enables transfer of key risks

• Maintains government ownership and 

control of public assets

• Suitable to wide array of infrastructure 

assets

• Existing regulatory hurdles

• Risk of government changing contract 

terms 

• Negative public perceptions of major 

private involvement in public assets

Pros Cons

1Source: Infra-deals 2016 Trend Report.

5
Features of a Successful PPP

6

• Transparency

• Regulatory and legal certainty

• Affordability/value for money

• Accessibility to efficient funding sources
• Strong, highly desired asset class 

• Significant U.S. investment opportunity

• Substantial equity/debt capital waiting on the sidelines

• We recommend the Trump administration increase privatesector U.S. involvement via PPP channel

Key Takeaways

7
Jennifer VanDerStok; et al.,

Merrick Garland, in his official capacity, et al. 

4:22-cv-691

Joseph C. Amrhein, Jr.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 81-2 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1122
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>       5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Jun-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                           Jul-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                     8,722,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,696,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 345,000
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          12,453,000
<PP&E>                                     5,662,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,700,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            21,931,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4,948,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                16,359,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              21,931,000
<SALES>                                    4,017,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,017,000
<CGS>                                      3,418,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              6,072,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (250,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (6,421,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (6,421,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (6,421,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.18)







</TABLE>
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 362

To designate March 20 through 26, 1995, as ‘‘National Long-Term Care

Administrators Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1994

Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate March 20 through 26, 1995, as ‘‘National

Long-Term Care Administrators Week’’.

Whereas long-term care administrators manage the day-today operations of over 20,000 nursing homes in the

United States; and

Whereas over 1,800,000 elderly and chronically ill individuals

place their well-being in the hands of the administrators

and the staff they supervise: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HJ 362 IH

1 That March 20 through 26, 1995, is designated as ‘‘Na2 tional Long-Term Care Administrators Week’’, and the

3 President of the United States is authorized and requested

4 to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the

5 United States to observe such week with appropriate cere6 monies and activities.

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID W. ROBERTS and ROYAL PALM PROPERTIES, LLC

, Appellant s ,

v.

CHRISTIE’S GREAT ESTATES, INC. n/k/a CHRISTIE’S INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE, INC., a Florida Corporation, PREMIER ESTATE PROPERTIES, INC., GERARD P. LIGUORI,

CARMEN N. D’ANGELO, JR., JOSEPH G. LIGUORI, RICK S.
FELBERBAUM, individually, and FELBERBAUM & ASSOCIATES, P.A., a Florida professional association, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 531

[ March 1, 2018 ]

Appeal fro m the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit,

Palm Beach County ; Meenu Sasser , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50 2009CA40545 (AI)

.

Robert J. Hauser of Pankauski Hauser PLLC, West Palm Beach, Gerald F. Richman, Gary S. Betensky and Brett L. Goldbl att of Richman Greer, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Robert A. Sweetapple of Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkas, Boca Raton, for appellants.

Stephen A. Mendelsohn, Jerold I. Budney of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Boca Raton, Elliot H. Scherker and Brigid F. Cech Samol e of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for appellees Rick S. Felberbaum and Felberbaum & Associates, P.A.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ian Westergreen, Also Known as Charles Thomas, Appellant.

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J., at trial, *Sandoval*hearing and sentence; Richard Carruthers, J., at *Huntley*hearing), rendered February 24, 1989, convicting defendant, after separate jury trials, of two counts of burglary in the third degree and sentencing him to consecutive indeterminate terms of 3 *Vi*to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was charged, in each of two separate indictments, with the crime of burglary in the third degree, in connection with incidents at two separate premises occurring, respectively, on December 23, 1987 (indictment No. 803/88) and on February 13, 1988 (indictment No. 2674/88).

In connection with indictment No. 803/88, defendant contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the conviction. However, review of the record reveals overwhelming evidence of guilt presented by the People, based upon eyewitness testimony of defendant’s unauthorized presence and actions in the premises, which is essentially uncontra*396dieted by defendant’s inherently incredible claim of innocent purpose.

Defendant’s *pro se*claims, in connection with indictment No. 803/88, of error on the part of the Trial Judge and prosecutorial misconduct have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

In connection with indictment No. 2674/88, defendant contends that the hearing Judge erred in denying suppression of statements made to the police both prior to and after administration of the *Miranda*warnings. Upon being summoned by building security personnel to investigate a "suspicious male” at the premises, police asked limited, on-the-scene clarifying questions of defendant regarding a possible crime, which did not require *Miranda*warnings *(People v Huffman,*41 NY2d 29). Thus, the hearing court correctly held that statements made by defendant in response to such *preMiranda*questioning are admissible. It is conceded by defendant that all further statements made by defendant to the police were made post-*Miranda.*In light of defendant’s concession, defendant’s further argument that his *postMiranda*statements should have been deemed inadmissible as "tainted” by defendant’s pre*Miranda*statements must fail.

Defendant’s *pro se*claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has been reviewed and found to be without merit. Defendant’s argument that the sentence imposed was excessive is likewise without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch and Wallach, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67654-67655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2426; MM Docket No. 99-312; RM-9735]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mill Hall, Jersey Shore, and 
Pleasant Gap, PA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Forever Broadcasting, LLC., 
reallots Channel 249A from Jersey Shore to Mill Hall, Pennsylvania, and 
modifies Station WVRT(FM)'s license accordingly. We also reallot 
Channel 254A from Mill Hall to Pleasant Gap, Pennsylvania, and modify 
Station WZRZ(FM)'s license accordingly. See 64 FR 59728, November 3, 
1999. Channel 249A can be reallotted to Mill Hall in compliance with 
the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements at Station 
WVRT(FM)'s requested site. The coordinates for Channel 249A at Mill 
Hall are 41-08-03 North Latitude and 77-28-09 West Longitude. 
Additionally, Channel 254A

[[Page 67655]]

can be reallotted to Pleasant Gap in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements at Station WZRZ(FM)'s 
requested site. The coordinates for Channel 254A at Pleasant Gap are 
40-55-58 North Latitude and 77-45-40 West Longitude.

DATES: Effective December 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-312, adopted October 18, 2000, and 
released October 27, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, 
SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under 
Pennsylvania, is amended by adding Channel 249A and removing Channel 
254A at Mill Hall; and adding Pleasant Gap, Channel 254A; and removing 
Channel 249A at Jersey Shore.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-28879 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
Case 3:22-cr-00168-X Document 21 Filed 05/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 33