alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 194 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 194

   To designate the week beginning September 19, 1993, as ``National 
                  Historically Black Colleges Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1993

    Mr. Spence introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   To designate the week beginning September 19, 1993, as ``National 
                  Historically Black Colleges Week''.

Whereas there are 107 Historically Black Colleges and Universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas such colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas such institutions have allowed many underprivileged students to attain 
        their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of the Historically Black Colleges and 
        Universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning 
September 19, 1993, is designated as ``National Historically Black 
Colleges Week'' and the President is authorized and requested to issue 
a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States and 
interested groups to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies, 
activities, and programs, thereby demonstrating support for 
Historically Black Colleges and Universities in the United States.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
C. Sandvig, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.

                                                    /s/ Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    August 10, 2005
#### COX v. STATE.

No. 21310.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 4, 1940.

Joe Bailey Morris, of Dallas, for appellant.

*189Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a sentence of three years in the penitentiary on ■ a charge of passing a forged instrument.

Appellant pleaded guilty and there are no hills of exception. We have examined the record, including a statement of facts, and are of the opinion that the proceedings are regular. The judgment entered is warranted and there is no question before this court for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Ex-parte Meeting Summary

DATE:

April 07, 2008

SUBJECT:

Static Inverter SNPRM 2002-NM-12-AD

MEETING MEMBER:

Phil Forde, Samuel Slentz, Binh Tran, George Roussos (SACO)

Marlene Nelson, Joseph Cooledge, John Murphy (Boeing)

DISCUSSION:

Boeing made comments to exclude the models 747 and 777 from SNPRM 2002-NM-12-

AD applicability. We met with Boeing to discuss the data that they have to support their

position for the 747 and 777. Their position was that the units have no significant service

history problem on the models mentioned and the exposure is low on these models

because of the limited times the static inverter is used on these models. We expressed our

position that the static inverter is subject to the same failure mode on these models but

that the exposure is reduced because of the limited times of operation.

CONCLUSION:

We extended the compliance time on these models due to the reduced risk resulting from

the limited exposure. We changed the compliance time for 747 and 777 from 42 months

to 60 months as noted in the response to the comments.

I'REPARED BY: Binh Tran , ANM-130S. Phone: (425) 917-6485
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE MATTER OF THE

PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF:

AENOY PHASAY,

Petitioner.

No. 76082-3-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: MAY 1 4 2018

PER CURIAM — Aenoy Phasay seeks relief from his convictions for second

degree intentional murder and second degree felony murder. He contends, and the

State concedes, that the convictions violate double jeopardy and that the matter must

be remanded with directions "to vacate the lesser offense." State v. Hughes,166

Wn.2d 675, 686 n.13, 212 P.3d 558 (2009) (discussing factors for determining lesser

offense). Although the trial court merged the two convictions for sentencing purposes

and expressly sentenced Phasay for only one conviction, a conviction carries an onus

that, in and of itself, constitutes punishment for purposes of double jeopardy analysis.

State v. Womac,160 Wn.2d 643, 656-61, 160 P.3d 40 (2007); State v. Turner, 169

Wn.2d 448, 455, 238 P.3d 461 (2010). Accordingly, we accept the concession of error

and remand for vacation of the lesser offense.

Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FOR THE COURT:

em2c,T1 -

,
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, by andamong J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight LoanServices, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C28 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD LEE HARDERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-768

[December 20, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502016CF011603BXXXMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Christine C. Geraghty, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Maryellen M. 

Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I,TNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-055-01-H

DERRICK DEWAINE ROQUEMORE,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GIJILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of sewice in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OX1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Datedoctober 9( ,2022.

JAMES HENDRIX

UNITED TATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-00055-H-BU Document 27 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 51
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of 8point3 Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended November 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 6, 2017 |   | By:    | /s/ CHARLES D. BOYNTON                                                                                                |
|---------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |   | Charles D. Boynton                                                                                                         |
|                |   |   | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director of 8point3 General Partner, LLC

(Principal Executive Officer) |
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ISS AVIATION, INC

(WYOMING) AND ISS

AVIATION, INC.

(GUYANA); 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

BELL TEXTRON, INC.

Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:22-CV-00689-O 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL AND WITHDRAW

COMES NOW, ISS Aviation, Inc. (Wyoming) and ISS Aviation, Inc. (Guyana) (herein 

after, “Plaintiffs”) and along with its current and former counsel files this Unopposed Motion to 

Substitute Counsel and Withdraw and shows the Court as follows: 

1. Lead counsel for Plaintiffs, Ms. Jervonne D. Newsome, has moved from Lynn, 

Pinker, Hurst, & Schwegmann, LLP to Winston & Strawn, LLP. Plaintiffs wish for Winston & 

Strawn, LLP to substitute in as their counsel in this matter.

2. In addition, Lynn, Pinker, Hurts, & Schwegmann, LLP and Michele Naudin with 

email address mnaudin@lynnllp.com wish to formally withdraw from this suit.

3. This substitution and withdrawal will not impact any deadlines in this litigation and 

will cause no delays as the parties have agreed to a brief extension of the current response deadline 

to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs will file an unopposed motion regarding same. 

4. Counsel for the defendant has indicated that Defendant Bell Textron, Inc. has no 

objection to this motion. 

Case 4:22-cv-00689-O Document 10 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 231
2 

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiffs respectfully request that Winston & 

Strawn, LLP be substituted as his counsel in this matter and that Lynn, Pinker, Hurst, & 

Schwegmann, LLP and Michele Naudin be allowed to withdraw. 

Dated: October 18, 2022 

Respectfully submitted,

WINSTON & STRAWN, LLP

/s/ Jervonne D. Newsome 

Jervonne D. Newsome 

Texas Bar No. 24094869 

jnewsome@winston.com 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

2121 North Pearl Street, Suite 900 

Dallas, TX 75201 

T: 214-453-6500 

F: 214-453-6400 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiffs conferenced with counsel for Defendant and the 

law firm of Lynn, Pinker, Hurst, & Schwegmann about the substance of the motion presented 

herein. All parties and counsel have indicated that they were not opposed to the relief sought by 

this motion.

 /s/ Jervonne D. Newsome

Case 4:22-cv-00689-O Document 10 Filed 10/18/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 232
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 18th day of October, 2022, the foregoing was served on all 

counsel of record via the Court’s electronic filing notification system.

/s/ Jervonne D. Newsome

Case 4:22-cv-00689-O Document 10 Filed 10/18/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 233
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 318 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 318

  To designate the month of April 1994 as ``Civil War History Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1994

Mr. Shaw introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate the month of April 1994 as ``Civil War History Month''.

Whereas the period of American history known as the ``Civil War'' is universally 
        recognized as one of the most significant landmark eras in our Nation's 
        heritage;
Whereas the continuous growth of the public's awareness of and interest in the 
        Civil War period remains an integral part of America's cultural 
        heritage;
Whereas the study, preservation, and interpretation of literature and sites 
        associated with this period are imbedded in the educational and cultural 
        heritage of our country;
Whereas the beginning of the Civil War occurred in April of 1861 with the firing 
        on Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina, and the effective ending 
        of the Civil War occurred in April of 1865 with the surrender of the 
        Army of Northern Virginia at Appomattox, Virginia, making April the most 
        important month of the year in Civil War history; and
Whereas the heritage of the Civil War deserves the attention and respect of all 
        individuals in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That April of 1994 is 
designated as ``Civil War History Month'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe the month with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Harry Sterling, Respondent, v Judith Levitt, as New York City Personnel Director, et al., Appellants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered August 10, 1989, which granted the petition to compel respondents to provide petitioner with back pay for the period during which the respondents had disqualified him from employment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondents’ determination that petitioner lacked the requisite experience for the position of stockhandler, to which he had been permanently appointed by the New York City Department of Sanitation, resulted in his disqualification. Subsequently, the Civil Service Commission reversed on the ground that there existed credible evidence that petitioner satisfied the necessary experience requirements of the position. Petitioner was reinstated with full benefits, including seniority and sick pay, but was denied back pay by respondents Department of Sanitation and Department of Personnel.

*315Respondents’ position that petitioner is not entitled to the remedy of back pay, pursuant to Civil Service Law § 77, without a demonstration that his deprivation of employment arose out of respondents’ “bad faith”, is without merit. Neither the statute nor authorities requires bad faith as a predicate. All that need be shown is that petitioner’s loss of employment was wrongful in that it violated his rights in law or contract. *(See, Warner v Board of Educ.,*14 AD2d 300, *affd*12 NY2d 924.) As respondents wrongfully interfered with petitioner’s rights under the Civil Service Law, he is entitled to the remedy of back pay *(Mauro v Village of Freeport,*143 AD2d 75, *lv denied*73 NY2d 702). Concur — Carro, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official

capacity as Attorney General of the United

States; et al.,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF JENNIFER VANDERSTOK

I, Jennifer VanDerStok, declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746,

that the following statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge:

1. I am over 18 years of age and am competent to testify to the matters contained

herein.

2. I would directly purchase items including one marketed as an “80% Lower” from

Tactical Machining, LLC, or another direct sales manufacturer, within the next three to four

months if such a purchase would not subject me to any civil or criminal fines or penalties.

3. While I could request that Tactical Machining or another manufacturer ship an

“80% Lower” to a local Federal Firearms Licensee (“FFL”) who would then transfer it to me,

based upon my inquiry directed to a local FFL, if I did so I would be subjected to additional costs,

including a transfer fee. The FFL I would likely use for such transfer charges $30.00.

4. Additionally, FFL transfers must be done in person, resulting in additional time

commitments and expenses I would not have to incur if I did not have to go through an FFL and

could have the item shipped directly to me.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 62-1 Filed 09/08/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 870
2

5. Due to the vague nature of the Final Rule, I am uncertain what tools or equipment,

in conjunction with such an “80% Lower” may be considered a firearm under the Final Rule. I fear

prosecution for directly buying an “80% Lower” while in possession of other tools and equipment.

6. Finally, my understanding is that the ATF Final Rule restricts my ability to 

purchase and a manufacturer’s ability to provide a jig, guide, instructions, or potentially other 

items that would facilitate my use of an “80% Lower” or similar item. But for the Final Rule’s 

restrictions, I would buy a jig, guide, or instructions that would help me learn to manufacture a 

“80% Lower” into an actual frame or receiver.

DATED this _8_th day of September, 2022.

Jennifer VanDerStok

Jennifer VanDerStok

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 62-1 Filed 09/08/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 871
H. J. Res. 265

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Joint Resolution

To designate October 19, 1993, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, one hundred

eighty-two thousand women will be diagnosed with breast cancer

in 1993, and forty-six thousand women will die from this disease;

Whereas, in the decade of the 1990’s, it is estimated that about

two million women will be diagnosed with breast cancer, resulting

in nearly five hundred thousand deaths;

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a woman

at age seventy having twice as much of a chance of developing

the disease than a woman at age fifty;

Whereas 80 percent of women who get breast cancer have no

family history of the disease;

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at an accredited facility, can provide a safe and quick diagnosis;

Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method

of early detection of breast cancer, and early detection is the

key to saving lives; and

Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers

up to two years before regular clinical breast examinations or

breast self-examinations (BSE), saving as many as a third more

lives: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That October

19, 1993, be designated as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’, and

the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
H. J. Res. 265—2

calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day

with appropriate programs and activities.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.