alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valrico Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jerry L. Ball, Executive Vice President and CFO of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Jerry L. Ball
EVP / CFO
November 15, 2004
From: "Stotts, Stacy" <SStotts@stinson.com>

To: Nathan Topham/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, <nate.topham@gmail.com>

Cc: "Joseph Stolle" <joseph@shellengr.com>, "Miller, Aaron" <amiller@doerun.com>, "Marucheau, Louis" <lmarucheau@doerun.com>

Date: 06/02/2011 01:20 AM Subject

: Primary MACT

Nathan – As a follow-up to our conversation today, the stack stacking done in 2009 is a valid stack test. As you know stack tests necessarily have variability due to a differences in the conditions, feed etc. at any facility. The test for 2009 does (and would be expected to) reveal different information for the time frame tested in 2009

than in prior years. This test is valid and was accepted by the state agency and can be used as a part of the evaluation of comments submitted by Doe Run on the proposed Primary MACT rule.

Please contact me if you have any other questions.

Stacy Stotts | Partner | Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP 1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 | Kansas City, MO 64106-2150 T: 816.691.3363 | F: 816.412.9326 | M: 816.304.3067 SStotts@stinson.com | www.stinson.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This communication is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use or disclose the contents to others.

Page 1
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 376

Designating the third Friday of September of each year as ‘‘National POW/

MIA Recognition Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1994

Mr. MONTGOMERY (by request) introduced the following joint resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the third Friday of September of each year

as ‘‘National POW/MIA Recognition Day’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the third Friday of September of each year is des4 ignated as ‘‘National POW/MIA Recognition Day’’. The

5 President is authorized and requested to call upon the peo6 ple of the United States to observe that day each year

7 with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and observances.

Æ
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 220

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 10 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Committee discharged

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the month of August as ‘‘National Scleroderma

Awareness Month’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas scleroderma is a disease caused by the excess production of collagen, the main fibrous component of connective tissue, causing hardening of the skin or internal

organs, or both, such as the esophagus, lungs, kidney,

and heart;

Whereas approximately 300,000 people in the United States

suffer from scleroderma, with women of childbearing age

outnumbering men 4 to 1;

Whereas scleroderma, a painful, crippling, and disfiguring

disease, is most often progressive and can result in premature death;
2

•HJ 220 CDS

Whereas the symptoms of scleroderma are variable which can

complicate and confuse diagnosis;

Whereas the cause and cure of scleroderma are unknown; and

Whereas scleroderma is an orphan disease that requires intensive research to improve treatment as well as find the

cause and cure: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the months of August 1993 and August 1994 are

4 designated as ‘‘National Scleroderma Awareness Month’’.

5 The President is authorized and requested to issue a proc6 lamation calling on the people of the United States to ob7 serve each such month with appropriate activities that will

8 enhance awareness of the disease and the need for a cure.

Passed the House of Representatives August 5,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### J. L. JOSEPH et al., Petitioners, v. Jesse JAMES, State Treasurer, et al., Respondents.

No. *A*-151.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 31, 1945.

Rehearing Denied March 28, 1945.

Kuykendall, Bauknight, Mann & Stevenson and F. L. Kuykendall, all of Austin, for petitioners.

Grover Sellers, Atty. Gen., Gerald C. Mann, former Atty. Gen., of Dallas, and Gaynor Kendall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.

J. L. Joseph and others, who are engaged as hairdressers and cosmetologists in the State of Texas, brought this suit against the Honorable Jesse James, State Treasurer, and others to enjoin the transfer of fuiids from the “Board of Cosmetology Fund” to the General Revenue Fund, as provided for in Acts of 1943, 48th Leg., ch. 313, p. 469, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. arts. 4385a, 6687b § 15. The trial court rendered judgment for plaintiffs, holding that the above-mentioned Act was unconstitutional, and enjoining the transfer of such funds. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment for the defendants. 179 S.W.2d 411.

In the companion case of Gulf Insurance Company et al. v. Jesse James, State Treas*975urer, et al., 185 S.W.2d 966, we have held that Section 2 of the Act of 1943, 48th Leg., ch. 313, p. 469, which authorized the transfer of these funds to the General Revenue Fund, was unconstitutional. Since the Act which authorized the transfer of the funds is unconstitutional, the trial court properly enjoined the transfer of said funds.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

SHARP, J., dissenting.
H. Con. Res. 304 Agreed to October 8, 1994

One Hundred Third Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1312) to amend the 

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in order to 

provide for the availability of remedies for certain former pension 

plan participants and beneficiaries, the Secretary of the Senate 

shall make the following corrections: 

(1) In section 1, strike ‘‘1993’’ and insert ‘‘1994’’. 

(2) In section 2(1), strike ‘‘paragraph (5)’’ and insert 

‘‘paragraph (7)’’. 

(3) In section 2(2), strike ‘‘paragraph (6)’’ and insert 

‘‘paragraph (8)’’. 

(4) In section 2(3), in the new paragraph (7) to be added 

thereby, strike ‘‘(7)’’ and insert ‘‘(9)’’. 

(5) In section 3, strike ‘‘subsection (a)(7)’’ and insert 

‘‘subsection (a)(9)’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29703]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service gives 
notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act), that 
it will hold a meeting of the Civilian Community Corps (CCC) Advisory 
Board. The Board advises the Director of CCC concerning the 
administration of the program and assists in the development and 
administration of the Corps. At this meeting, the Board will discuss 
the general status of the program and its overall sustainability. The 
meeting will be open to the public.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, December 5, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at Corporation Headquarters, 1201 New 
York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20525.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Merlene Mazyck, 1201 New York 
Avenue N.W., 9th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20525. Telephone (202) 606-
5000, ext. 137 (T.D.D. (202) 565-2799).
    Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available 
in alternative formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and who need an accommodation to 
attend the meeting may notify Ms. Mazyck.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
Thomas L. Bryant,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-29703 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-U
Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

Paul Garrett,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Ron’s Towing, Inc., 

Defendant.

Cause No. 3:22-cv-01853-E

District Judge Ada Brown

Magistrate Judge David L. Horan

Defendant’s Motion for Withdrawal, Substitution and 

Redesignation of Lead Counsel

On joint motion of enrolled defense counsel, Donald R. Miller and Cary A. Hilburn, 

suggesting to the Court that Mr. Miller desires to withdraw as lead counsel and 

attorney of record for Defendant Ron’s Towing, Inc., in the above-styled and numbered 

cause, and on motion of Cary A. Hilburn, suggesting he desires to be designated and 

substituted for Mr. Miller as lead counsel for Ron’s Towing, Inc. Mr. Miller is leaving 

the active practice of law and has accepted employment as professor for a law school. 

Attorney WT Skip Leake and his firm WT Skip Leake PC will remain enrolled in the 

case as co-counsel in this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Cary A Hilburn

Cary A. Hilburn (LA 26656/TX 00790881) 

HILBURN & HILBURN, APLC

220 Carroll Street, Building B

Shreveport, Louisiana 71105

Telephone: (318) 868-8810

Case 3:22-cv-01853-E Document 30 Filed 10/20/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 115
Page 2 of 3

Fax: (877) 462-6796

E-mail: cah@HilburnLaw.com

WT SKIP LEAKE PC

350 Westpark Way, Ste. 205 (Euless) 76040

P.O. Box 1910

Euless, Texas 76039

Phone: (817) 460-7711

Fax: (817) 469-7020

W.T. “Skip” Leake

TBN: 12092350

Email: wtsleake@leakelaw.com

Donald R. Miller

TBN: 24070273

Email: drmiller@leakelaw.com

J. Charlie Conway

TBN: 24092281

Email: cconway@leakelaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Ron’s Towing, Inc.

Certificate of Conference

Counsel for both sides conferred regarding this motion on 10//2023, and 

plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose the motion or the requested relief.

/s/ Cary A Hilburn

Case 3:22-cv-01853-E Document 30 Filed 10/20/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 116
Page 3 of 3

Certificate of Service

The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was

served on opposing counsel listed below the electronic filing service for the USDC-N.TX 

on Friday, October 20, 2023. 

Colby Levi Qualls

Sanford Law Firm

10800 Financial Center Pkwy

Suite 510

Little Rock, AR 72211

501-904-1649

Fax: 501-904-1649

Email: colby@sanfordlawfirm.com

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

/s/ Cary A Hilburn

Cary A. Hilburn

Case 3:22-cv-01853-E Document 30 Filed 10/20/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 117
Case 5:22-cr-00033-H-BQ Document 31 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Zara Kanji, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alexandra Capital Corp.
      for the year ended November 30, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Alexandra Capital Corp.                                                               

Date: April 25, 2018.

/s/ Zara
      KanjiZara KanjiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)Alexandra Capital Corp.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alexandra
Capital Corp. and will be retained by Alexandra Capital Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
----

MEDIA PLUS — DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION AND PROMOTION (2001-2006)

Notification of Call for Proposals INFSO-MEDIA/06/2005

Implementation of a programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works

Measures to support promotion and market access:

Audiovisual festivals

(2005/C 159/13)

1.   Objectives and description

This Call for Proposals is based on Council Decision (2000/821/EC) concerning the implementation of a programme encouraging the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA PLUS Development, Distribution and Promotion 2001 — 2006), adopted by the Council on 20 December 2000 and published in the Official Journal of the European Communities L 13 of January 17, 2001.

Among the objectives of the abovementioned Council Decision are:

2.   Eligible candidates

The present notification is addressed to European organisations; those registered in and controlled by nationals from the Member States of the European Union and countries of the European Economic Agreement participating in the MEDIA Plus Programme (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway), Switzerland, as well as those other countries that satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 11 of Decision 2000/821/EC (at the date of publication: Bulgaria).

Such organisations must implement audiovisual festivals which contribute to the afore mentioned objectives and which screen a minimum of 70 % European films from at least 10 States participating in the MEDIA Programme, in their total programme.

3.   Budget and duration of projects

The maximum budget allocated to this support for Call for Proposals 06/2005 will be EUR 2,2 million.

The financial support from the Commission cannot exceed 50 % of the total eligible costs.

The present Call for Proposals is only valid for projects audiovisual festivals which start between 28 April 2006 and 31 May 2007.

4.   Deadline

Applications must be submitted at the latest by the following deadlines:

5.   Complete information

The complete text of the Call for Proposals, as well as the application forms are available on http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/avpolicy/media/festiv_en.html

Applications must respect all conditions set out in this complete text and must be submitted using the application forms provided.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 122 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 122

 To designate the month of May 1993, as ``National Foster Care Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1993

Mr. Roth introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the month of May 1993, as ``National Foster Care Month''.

Whereas there are more than one-hundred thousand licensed foster families in the 
        United States who temporarily provide guidance, emotional support, food, 
        shelter, and nurture to children who cannot remain in their own home;
Whereas foster parents devotedly and unselfishly open their home and family life 
        to children in need;
Whereas foster parents are a vital part in permanency planning to protect the 
        best interests of a foster child;
Whereas foster parents work cooperatively with human service agencies and 
        biological parents to strengthen family life;
Whereas foster parents must have the commitment of the national, State and local 
        communities in terms of funding, support, and training; and
Whereas the National Foster Parent Association holds its annual training 
        conference during the month of May 1993: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the month of May 1993, is 
designated as ``National Foster Care Month''. The President is 
requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United 
States to observe such month with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```
CDFI FY 2016 Capital Investment Plan Page 1 of 1 2/4/2015

CDFI 4.1 Table

(values in $millions)

Label

PY Agency 

DME

PY 

External 

Contributi

ons DME

PY Agency 

O&M

PY 

External 

Contributi

ons O&M PY Total

CY Agency 

DME

CY 

External 

Contributi

ons DME

CY Agency 

O&M

CY 

External 

Contributi

ons O&M CY Total

BY Agency 

DME

BY 

External 

Contributi

ons DME

BY Agency 

O&M

BY 

External 

Contributi

ons O&M BY Total

% Change 

from CY 

to BY 

Request

Capital Investments Total 4.984 0 3.507 0 8.491 0.2 0 3.942 0 4.142 0.2 0 3.153 0 3.353 -19.049

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 4.984 0 3.507 0 8.491 0.2 0 3.942 0 4.142 0.2 0 3.153 0 3.353 -19.049

IT Total 4.984 0 3.507 0 8.491 0.2 0 3.942 0 4.142 0.2 0 3.153 0 3.353 -19.049

non-IT Total

CDFI Total 4.984 0 3.507 0 8.491 0.2 0 3.942 0 4.142 0.2 0 3.153 0 3.353 -19.049

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 4.984 0 3.507 0 8.491 0.2 0 3.942 0 4.142 0.2 0 3.153 0 3.353 -19.049

IT Total 4.984 0 3.507 0 8.491 0.2 0 3.942 0 4.142 0.2 0 3.153 0 3.353 -19.049

non-IT Total

CDFI Major IT Investments

CDFI non-Major IT Investments

Award Management Information System 4.03 0 0 0 4.03 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.5 0 0.7 250

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

4.03 0 0 0 4.03 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.5 0 0.7 250

CDFI LAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund 

Public Website

0.483 0 0 0 0.483 0 0 0.12 0 0.12 0 0 0.12 0 0.12 0

015-05-4560 ATreasury Franchise Fund 0.375 0 0 0 0.375 0 0 0.12 0 0.12 0 0 0.12 0 0.12 0

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

0.108 0 0 0 0.108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Community Investment Impact System 0 0 0.943 0 0.943 0 0 0.85 0 0.85 0 0 0.867 0 0.867 2

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

0 0 0.833 0 0.833 0 0 0.85 0 0.85 0 0 0.867 0 0.867 2

015-05-0142 State Small Business Credit Initiative 0 0 0.11 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

IT Program Management Support 0 0 0.645 0 0.645 0 0 1.119 0 1.119 0 0 0.504 0 0.504 -54.96

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

0 0 0.645 0 0.645 0 0 1.119 0 1.119 0 0 0.504 0 0.504 -54.96

IT Security 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Legacy Mission Systems 0.472 0 1.919 0 2.391 0 0 1.853 0 1.853 0 0 1.162 0 1.162 -37.291

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

0.472 0 1.919 0 2.391 0 0 1.853 0 1.853 0 0 1.162 0 1.162 -37.291

CDFI non-IT Investments

PY 2014 Funding (Estimated Actuals) CY 2015 Funding (President's Budget) BY 2016 Funding (Requested)

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total % Change 

from CY to 

BY
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

69) IV-C-35 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:54 AM Sheet 69 of 232 
. ^ £0S ^ 

% PflO^ 

' / 

P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL.PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

CTAM '9 W * 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. Dan Schofield, President 

Dan Schofield Lincoln Mercury 

1520 North Hermitage Rd. 

P.O. Box 1480 

Hermitage, PA 16148 

Dear Mr. Schofield: 

Thank you for your comments concerning EPA's proposal to 

require onboard refueling emission controls. Be assured that 

your comments will be considered in the next phase of our 

rulemaking. We will also be placing them in the public docket 

for the Rulemaking. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

Honorable Arlen Specter 

U.S. Senate
#### McGUIRE v. STATE.

No. 25705.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 13, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The state has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and accompanies it with an affidavit showing that the appellant has escaped jail. The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.