alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.8**

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation 

1134 Market Street 

Wheeling, WV 26003 

Attention: Paul J. Mooney, Executive Vice President & 

Chief Financial Officer 

Re:Convertible Promissory Note - Amendment 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Senior Subordinated Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 16, 2007, made by Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Borrower”) payable toBouchard 10S, LLC (the “Holder”) in the principal amount of US $2,000,000, (the “Note”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Note. 

In accordance with Section 15 of the Note and intending to be legally bound, the Holder and Borrower hereby agree to amend the Note as follows:

(1) The definition of “Applicable Conversion Price” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

     “Applicable Conversion Price” means $24.51 (subject to adjustment as provided inSection 5(d)(iii)). 

(2) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Note, the Holder and the Borrower hereby agree that the Holdershall have the right to opt out of any automatic conversion of the Note as set forth in Section 5(a) and 5(b)(ii) of the Note. 

TheHolder and the Borrower hereby acknowledge and agree that this letter agreement constitutes a valid amendment of the Note pursuant to Section 15 thereof. Except to the extent necessary to implement the changes set forth above, the Note shallremain unmodified and in full force and effect. This letter agreement shall constitute an allonge to the Note and shall be affixed thereto so as to become a part thereof. 

**[Signatures appear on the following page]**

If you have any questions about the matters covered in this letter, please feel free to contact me.

Very truly yours, 

 
Bouchard 10S, LLC
/s/ Craig T. Bouchard

Craig T. Bouchard

Dated: 6/7/07

 

Acknowledged and agreed:

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation

By:        /s/ Paul J.Mooney                

Name: Paul J. Mooney

Title:   Executive Vice President and Chief
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 5

Expressing the sense of the Congress that any Federal agency that utilizes

the Draize rabbit eye irritancy test should develop and validate alternative ophthalmic testing procedures that do not require the use of

animal test subjects.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. JACOBS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that any Federal agency that utilizes the Draize rabbit eye irritancy test should

develop and validate alternative ophthalmic testing procedures that do not require the use of animal test subjects.

Whereas the Draize rabbit eye irritancy test has long been

used by various Federal agencies for predicting human

opththalmic response to pesticides and toxic chemicals,

household cleaning solvents, some medicinal products,

and other hazardous substances;

Whereas the Draize test causes significant pain to the albino

rabbit which is used in each irritancy test; and

Whereas the reliability of the Draize test has been called into

question: Now, therefore, be it
2

HCON 5 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Department of Health and Human Services, the

4 Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Environmental

5 Protection Agency, and any other department, agency,

6 or instrumentality of the United States that utilizes the

7 Draize rabbit eye irritancy test, should develop and vali8 date alternative ophthalmic testing procedures that do not

9 require the use of animal test subjects.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 258 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 258

 Expressing the sense of the United States Congress that the Citizen's 
  Stamp Advisory Committee of the United States Postal Service should 
  recommend to the Postmaster General that a postage stamp be issued 
  honoring America's first African-American professional nurse, Mary 
                             Eliza Mahoney.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1994

 Mr. Hilliard submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the United States Congress that the Citizen's 
  Stamp Advisory Committee of the United States Postal Service should 
  recommend to the Postmaster General that a postage stamp be issued 
  honoring America's first African-American professional nurse, Mary 
                             Eliza Mahoney.

Whereas the Citizen's Stamp Advisory Committee decides who may be honored by 
        having a stamp issued in their honor;
Whereas America's first professionally trained nurse graduated in 1873;
Whereas Mary Eliza Mahoney, who was born in 1845, graduated in 1879 from the New 
        England Hospital for Women and Children as America's first African-
        American professionally trained nurse;
Whereas, during her 40-year career, Mary Mahoney practiced nursing in New 
        Jersey, Massachusetts, Washington, DC, and North Carolina;
Whereas in 1936, due to her unstinting work in the field of nursing, the 
        National Association of Colored Graduate Nurses established the Mary 
        Mahoney Award; and
Whereas she has served as a role model for generations of young African-
        Americans who aspire to greatness: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the United States Congress that the Citizen's 
Stamp Advisory Committee of the United States Postal Service should 
recommend to the Postmaster General that a postage stamp be issued 
honoring nurse Mary Eliza Mahoney.

                                 <all>
```
# & Memorandu m

U.S
. Departmen t o f 'Htinsportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n Subject: Notic e o f

Communicatio n i n Docket : Date : DOT-OST-OST-2010-001 8 201 0 U.S.-Haned aCombinatio nService s Allocatio n Proceedin g From : Th e Secretary To : Chief

, Docket s FE B 2 5 201 0

.•••' 1

"i"" ] C J 2 3 o f' 2 '£z 

# i < o I naccordanc e wit hDepartmen t rule s (1 4 CF

RPar t 300) , I a mreportin g th e followin g communication . O nFebruar y 19,2010 , durin g aphon e conversatio n wit hRepresentativ e Joh nDingell , th e Congressma n expresse dhi s suppor t fo r th e applicatio n o

f Delt aAir Line s i n th e 201 0 U.S.-Haned aCombinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceeding . I responde dthat , whil e I appreciate dhi s interes t i n thi s case , I coul dno t commen t

o n it s merit s becaus e th e proceedin g wa s unde r activ e consideratio n b y th e Department . Pleas e plac e thi s memorandu mi n th e appropriat e fil e an di n th e Docket .
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title	:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2003
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 279

Condemning the July 13, 1994, sinking of the ‘‘13th of March’’, a tugboat

carrying 72 unarmed Cuban citizens, by vessels of the Cuban Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 5, 1994

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr.

TORRICELLI, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. GILMAN, Mrs. MEEK, Mr.

GUTIERREZ, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. HASTINGS, and Mr. DEUTSCH) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the July 13, 1994, sinking of the ‘‘13th of

March’’, a tugboat carrying 72 unarmed Cuban citizens,

by vessels of the Cuban Government.

Whereas there are credible reports that on July 13, 1994,

vessels of the Cuban Government fired high-pressure

water hoses, repeatedly rammed, and deliberately sank

the ‘‘13th of March’’, a tugboat carrying 72 unarmed

Cuban citizens;

Whereas approximately 40 of the men, women, and children

passengers on the ‘‘13th of March’’ drowned as a result

of the actions of the Cuban Government, including over

20 children aboard;
2

•HCON 279 IH

Whereas President Clinton deplored the sinking of the ‘‘13th

of March’’ as ‘‘another example of the brutal nature of

the Cuban regime’’;

Whereas all of the male survivors of the ‘‘13th of March’’

have been imprisoned by the Cuban Government;

Whereas the freedom to emigrate is an internationally recognized human right and freedom’s fundamental guarantor

of last resort; and

Whereas the Cuban Government, by prohibiting the existence

of a free press and by jamming TV and Radio Marti, denies the Cuban people the right of free access to information, including information about this tragedy: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) condemns the Cuban Government for delib4 erately sinking on July 18, 1994, the ‘‘13th of

5 March’’, a tugboat carrying 72 unarmed Cuban citi6 zens, causing the death of approximately 40 Cuban

7 citizens, including over 20 children;

8 (2) urges the President to direct the United

9 States Representative to the United Nations to urge

10 the United Nations Security Council to adopt a reso11 lution that—

12 (A) condemns the sinking of the ‘‘13th of

13 March’’; and

14 (B) provides for a full internationally su15 pervised investigation of the incident; and
3

•HCON 279 IH

1 (3) urges the Cuban Government—

2 (A) to release from prison and cease in3 timidation measures against all survivors of the

4 sinking of the ‘‘13th of March’’;

5 (B) to identify all individuals missing from

6 such sinking;

7 (C) to recover the bodies of the dead from

8 such sinking; and

9 (D) to return such bodies to their families

10 so that these men, women, and children may

11 have appropriate burial services.

Æ
JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.

4:22-cv-691

Joseph C. Amrhein, Jr. 

Ashcroft Law Firm, LLC, 200 State Street, 7th Floor

Boston MA 02109

617-573-9400 617-933-7607

J. Christopher Amrhein, Jr.

Intervenor- Plaintiff, Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 81 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1118
Massachusetts

703170 11/27/2018

United States District Court - MA May 20, 2020 Active

N/A

N/A

N/A

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 81 Filed 09/23/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1119
N/A

/s/ J. Christopher Amrhein, Jr.

Brian D. Poe

909 Throckmorton Street

Fort Worth TX 76102

817-870-2022 817-977-6501

23rd September 2022

Joseph C. Amrhein, Jr.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 81 Filed 09/23/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1120
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER-358-000]


New York State Electric & Gas Corporation; Notice of Filing

November 13, 2000.

    Take notice that on November 3, 2000, New York State Electric & Gas 
Corporation (NYSEG) tendered for filing pursuant to Section 205 of the 
Federal Power Act and Section 35.13 of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's (FERC or Commission) Regulations, a supplement to Rate 
Schedule 72 filed with FERC corresponding to an Agreement with the 
Municipal Board of the Village of Bath (the Village). The proposed 
supplement would decrease revenues by $289.27 based on the twelve month 
period ending December 31, 2001.
    The rate filing is made pursuant to Section 2(a) through (c) of 
Article IV of the December 1, 1977 Facilities Agreement between NYSEG 
and the Village, filed with FERC. The annual charges for routine 
operation and maintenance and general expenses, as well as revenue and 
property taxes are revised based on data taken from NYSEG's Annual 
Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC Form 1) for 
the twelve month period during December 31, 1999. The revised 
facilities charge is levied on the cost of the tap facility constructed 
and owned by NYSEG to connect its 34.5 kV transmission line located in 
the Village to the Village's Fairview Drive Substation.
    NYSEG reqests an effective date of January 1, 2001.
    Copies of the filing were served upon the Municipal Board of the 
Village of Bath and the Public Service Commission of the State of New 
York.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or by November 24, 2000. Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.201(a)(1)(m) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29589 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

ISAAC C. LENSEY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:22-CV-119-Z-BR

§

BOBBY LUMPKIN, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff, Isaac C. Lensey, filed a complaint naming as Defendants state employees at his 

unit of incarceration and the Director of TDCJ-CID. By Order dated July 12, 2023, Plaintiff was 

directed to show cause on or before August 4, 2023 as to why he had not undertaken efforts to 

identify and serve several Defendants. (ECF 21). Plaintiff has not responded to the Order. 

Accordingly, dismissal is appropriate. 

RECOMMENDATION

As discussed in the Order to Show Cause, (ECF 21), Plaintiff has failed to effectuate 

service on three Defendants. Because he has failed to respond to the Order, it is the 

RECOMMENDATION of the United States Magistrate Judge to the United States District Judge 

that the claims of Plaintiff be DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE

The United States District Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Findings, Conclusion and 

Recommendation to each party by the most efficient means available.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

ENTERED on August 31, 2023. 

Case 2:22-cv-00119-Z-BR Document 24 Filed 08/31/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 498
2

* NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT *

Any party may object to these proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. In the 

event parties wish to object, they are hereby NOTIFIED that the deadline for filing objections is 

fourteen (14) days from the date of filing as indicated by the “entered” date directly above the 

signature line. Service is complete upon mailing, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), or transmission by 

electronic means, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E). Any objections must be filed on or before the 

fourteenth (14th) day after this recommendation is filed as indicated by the “entered” date. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).

Any such objections shall be made in a written pleading entitled “Objections to the 

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation.” Objecting parties shall file the written objections 

with the United States District Clerk and serve a copy of such objections on all other parties. A 

party’s failure to timely file written objections shall bar an aggrieved party, except upon grounds 

of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings, legal 

conclusions, and recommendation set forth by the Magistrate Judge and accepted by the district 

court. See Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en 

banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), as recognized in ACS 

Recovery Servs., Inc. v. Griffin, 676 F.3d 512, 521 n.5 (5th Cir. 2012); Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 

F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1988).

Case 2:22-cv-00119-Z-BR Document 24 Filed 08/31/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 499
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 5, 2013

s0529

Order 

Clerk

June 5, 2013

146523-4

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146523-4

COA: 309384, 310456

Oakland CC: 2008-222726-FC

SCHUYLER DION CHENAULT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the Court of Appeals’ decision in 

People v Lester, 232 Mich App 262, 281 (1998), correctly articulates what a defendant 

must show to establish a Brady violation; (2) whether the Court of Appeals erred when it 

reversed the trial court’s grant of a new trial, which was premised on the prosecution’s 

violation of the rule from Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83; 83 S Ct 1194; 10 L Ed 2d 215 

(1963); and (3) whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel under 

Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668; 104 S Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984), for failing 

to exercise reasonable diligence after learning of the existence of the videotaped 

interviews.

The Criminal Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan, and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to 

file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the 

issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus 

curiae.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 11
                        WALNUT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

                Statement re: Calculation of Per Share Earnings




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Six Months ended June 30,                   Three Months ended June 30,
                                  ------------------------------------           -------------------------------------
                                       1997                    1996                   1997                    1996
                                  -------------          -------------           -------------          --------------
<S>                               <C>                    <C>                     <C>                    <C>  
Net income (loss)                  $   (513,453)          $  1,279,315           $    521,978          $     (344,858)

Shares:
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding            14,616,687             13,871,385             14,616,687              13,930,554

Shares issuable upon exercise
of dilutive options and
warrants                                 29,906                426,788                 21,825                 410,848
                                   ------------            -----------           ------------             -----------
                            Total    14,646,593(1)          14,298,173             14,298,172              14,341,402(2)
                                   ============            ===========           ============             ===========
   Income (loss) per common share  $      (0.04)           $      0.09           $       0.04             $     (0.02)
</TABLE>

    (1)  The results of this calculation for the six-month period ending
         June 30, 1997 are antidilutive and, as such, are not presented on the
         Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The weighted average
         shares used in the calculation for per share earnings for the six
         months ended June 30, 1997 are 14,616,687.

    (2)  The results of this calculation for the three-month period ending
         June 30, 1996 are antidilutive and, as such, are not presented on the
         Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The weighted average
         shares used in the calculation for per share earnings for the three
         months ended June 30, 1996 were 13,930,554.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-051-01-H

LEONARD SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE TIIYITED STATES MAGISTRATE JTJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bX1), the undersigrred District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence willbe imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

4/1

Dated Septemb er .:t!, zoz2.

JAMES SLE HE RIX

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00051-H-BQ Document 26 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 50