alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 

JOSE LUIS LUNA LOPEZ (3),

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case Number: 3:22-CR-00366-M 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JOSE LUIS LUNA LOPEZ (3), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining JOSE LUIS LUNA LOPEZ (3) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in 

Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged is supported by 

an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea 

of guilty be accepted, and that JOSE LUIS LUNA LOPEZ (3) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) 

and 18 U.S.C. § 2 Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Schedule II Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting, 

and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

Date: February 21, 2023. 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

Case 3:22-cr-00366-M Document 95 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 162
#### WILSON v. STATE.

No. 22761.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1944.

Wright Stubbs, of Austin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for theft, a misdemeanor; the punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of forty days and a fine of $40.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 51 1

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE WAN

- TSING KWANG

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.



## ORDER

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

On October 2 4 , 2022, relator Wan

- Tsing Kwang filed a petition for writ of

mandamus and a motion for emergency stay. By petition for writ of mandamus, relator

seeks to compel the trial court to vacate a temporary order

, signed on October 12, 2022

,

requiring relator to pay attorney’s fees . By motion for emergency stay, relator seeks to

stay the trial court’s temporary order and the trial court proceedings.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency stay,

is of the opinion that it should be gran ted. Accordingly, we grant the motion for emergency

stay and we order the trial court’s temporary order and all tr i al court proceedings to be2 stayed pending the resolution of this original proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.10(b)

(“ Unless vacated or modifi ed, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case

is finally decided. ”). We request the real part y in interest , Jun Liang, or any others whose

interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, to f ile a response to the petition for

writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See

id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

24 th day of October , 202 2

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 365 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 365

          To designate August 16, 1994, as ``TV Nation Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1994

 Mr. Coble (for himself and Mr. Flake) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
          To designate August 16, 1994, as ``TV Nation Day''.

Whereas television is one industry with which no other country can compete with 
        America;
Whereas American popular culture is a major United States export;
Whereas some of the most memorable and uplifting moments in people's lives have 
        occurred while watching television, from the Apollo moon landing to 
        little baby Jessica's rescue from the well;
Whereas TV Nation will air on broadcast television in the United States, making 
        it available, free of charge, to everyone;
Whereas TV Nation is the first American/European joint television venture, and 
        will begin a new opportunity for similar ventures in the future;
Whereas other news magazine programs focus on what's wrong with America, TV 
        Nation focuses on what's right;
Whereas TV Nation will help the United States economy by providing many new 
        employment opportunities, particularly high-tech information ones; and
Whereas TV Nation employs numerous Oscar, Emmy, and Cable-Ace Award nominees and 
        winners: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That August 16, 1994, shall be designated as ``TV Nation 
Day''.

                                 <all>
```
Case 4:22-cr-00042-O Document 33 Filed 03/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 58
Case 4:22-cr-00042-O Document 33 Filed 03/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 59
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201 8000 80

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.


### CESAR ARRIAGA Corporal ( E

- 4 ) , U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________ Appeal fro m the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel E. H. Robinson Jr.
, USMC

. Convening Authority: Commanding General
, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Major Melanie J. Mann, USMC

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Paul D. Jenkins
, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 21 June 2018

____________________

_____ Before M ARKS , P RICE , and S TINSON , Appellate Military Ju dg es

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEX MONTELONGO,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00093-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D02910)

O R D E R

On August 6, 2018, H. Davidson Smith III, Appellant’s retained attorney, filed a motion to 

withdraw as counsel. However, before the Court considers the motion it will be necessary for the 

trial court to conduct a hearing.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine if the 

appellant has retained new counsel or is entitled to court-appointed counsel. The trial court shall 

forward its order and/or findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County on or before August 26, 

2018. The District Clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s 

order and or findings on or before September 5, 2018. Further, the transcription of the hearing 

shall be prepared, certified and filed with this Court on or before September 5, 2018. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6

th day of August, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 294 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 294

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Department of Housing and 
 Urban Development should not interfere with the exercise of the right 
of free speech, the right of free association, or the right to petition 
              the Government for a redress of grievances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 1994

  Mr. Leach submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Department of Housing and 
 Urban Development should not interfere with the exercise of the right 
of free speech, the right of free association, or the right to petition 
              the Government for a redress of grievances.

Whereas the freedom of speech protected under the first amendment to the 
        Constitution of the United States is one of the guiding principles of 
        this Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Department of Housing and 
Urban Development should not take any action that compromises, 
suppresses, or interferes with the exercise by any individual of the 
right of free speech, the right of free association, or the right to 
petition the Government for a redress of grievances through the 
legislative, executive, or judicial process.

                                 <all>
```
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08132013[8/20/2013 1:45:50 PM]

Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION &

INFORMATION POLICY

About OIRA

Information Policy

Federal Collection of

Information

Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside

Communication

Reports to Congress

For Agencies

Statistical Programs &

Standards

Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary

Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units

Date: 8 / 13 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable)

Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA

Bob Wayland EPA

Nick Hudson EPA

Barry Ellman EPA

Bill Stevens EPA

Paul Balzerack EPA

Drew McConville CEQ

Anne Finken CEQ

Jim Laity OMB/OIRA

Marty McBrooch American Electric Power

Matt Usher American Electric Power American Electric Power

Stephen Fatis Vanness Feldman Generations for Clean Air

Rachel Miller Forbes Tate Generations for Clean Air

Greg Ryan DTE

Kevin Leahy Duke Energy

About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home

The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries

Video

Performances

Briefing Room

Your Weekly Address

Speeches & Remarks

Press Briefings

Statements & Releases

White House Schedule

Presidential Actions

Issues

Civil Rights

Defense

Disabilities

Economy

Education

Energy & Environment

The Administration

President Barack Obama

Vice President Joe Biden

First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Jill Biden

The Cabinet

White House Staff

About the White House

Inside the White House

Presidents

First Ladies

The Oval Office

The Vice President's

Residence & Office

Our Government

The Executive Branch

The Legislative Branch

The Judicial Branch

The Constitution

Federal Agencies &

Commissions

Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Search
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08132013[8/20/2013 1:45:50 PM]

Live Streams

Podcasts

Legislation

Nominations &

Appointments

Disclosures

Ethics

Equal Pay

Foreign Policy

Health Care

Homeland Security

Immigration

Refinancing

Rural

Service

Seniors & Social Security

Snapshots

Taxes

Technology

Urban and Economic

Mobility

Veterans

Violence Prevention

Women

Executive Office of the

President

Other Advisory Boards

Eisenhower Executive

Office Building

Camp David

Air Force One

White House Fellows

White House Internships

Tours & Events

Mobile Apps

Elections & Voting

State & Local Government

Resources

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact

USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
#### ROYSE v. FAULKNER et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 8, 1953.

Lena M: Craig and J. A. Edge, Lexington, for appellant.

Robert F. Houlihan, Lexington, for ap-pellees. , ,

DUNCAN, Justice.

On September 13, 1951, appellees filed this action in the lower court against' the appellant, Homer "B. Royse, and J. Porter Land, Clerk of the Fayette County Court, by which they sought'to enjoin the clerk from placing the name of Royse upon the official ballot as a candidate for city commissioner of the city of Lexington to be voted for at the regular November, 1951, ¡election. It was-alleged .that appellant’s nominating petition contained a large number of fictitious names as well as a number of signatories who were not legal voters of the city of Lexington. It was further charged that the nominating petition did not contain the required number of signatures after deduction of the names of ineligible and nonexistent voters.

After hearing evidence on-an application for a temporary injunction, the jpdge of the Fayette Circuit Court, on October 6, 1951, granted *a*temporary injunction enjoining the county court clerk from placing 'appellant's náhié upon 'the ballot. On October 11, 1951, application was made to a judge of this Court for" a dissolution of the injunction, and the application was overruled on October 25, 1951. Appellant filed ,his answer on October 26, 1951, but made .no effort to introduce- testimony in his be•half, either-.on the hearing of .the application for a temporary injunction or subsequent to the filing of his answer. With the record in' this condition, the election was 'held on November 6/ 1951,' without appellant’s name appearing on the ballot.

.. On June 14, 1952, although the question yras moot at that time, a judgment was . entered in the lower court making the ■ injunction permanent. The appeal here is from that judgment. Appellees have moved *906to dismiss the appeal because the question which it presents is moot.

This is not an election contest and no order this Court could make would affect the validity of the city election held in Lexington on November 6, 1951. The successful candidates for city commissioner were awarded certificates of election by the proper board and whatever disposition is made of this appeal their right to hold the offices to which they are elected would not be affected. . ,

The nile has been applied by appellate courts without exception that where events have occurred which render it impossible for the court to grant effectual relief, the appeal will be dismissed. Finley v. Smith, 89 S.W. 547, 28 Ky.Law Rep. 564; Norris v. Bowles, 292 Ky. 541, 166 S.W.2d 981.

For the reasons indicated, the appeal is dismissed.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 406

To approve the location of a World War II Memorial in the Nation’s Capitol.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 21, 1994

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To approve the location of a World War II Memorial in

the Nation’s Capitol

Whereas section 6(a) of the Act entitled ‘‘To provide standards for placement of commemorative works on certain

Federal lands in the District of Columbia and its environs, and for other purposes,’’ approved November 14,

1986 (Public Law 99–652, 100 Stat. 3650), provides

that the location of a commemorative work in the area

described therein as Area I shall be deemed disapproved

unless the location is approved by law not later than 150

days after the Secretary of the Interior or the Administrator of General Services notifies the Congress of his de-
2

HJ 406 IH

termination that the commemorative work may be located

in Area I; and

Whereas Public Law 103–32, approved May 25, 1993 (107

Stat. 90), authorized the American Battle Monuments

Commission to establish a memorial on Federal land in

the District of Columbia to members of the Armed

Forces who served in World War II; and

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified the Congress of his determination that the memorial may be located in Area I: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the location of a World War II Memorial, authorized

4 by Public Law 103–32, within either Area I or Area II

5 as described in Public Law 99–652 (100 Stat. 3650), is

6 hereby approved.

Æ
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on

JOINT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3
Department of the Treasury

Strategic Plan Overview

2018–2022

Treasury’s Values

Treasury employees strive to maintain integrity

and uphold the public trust in all that we do, 

explore better ways of conducting business 

through innovation, seek diversity of thought and 

expertise to inform our decisions, embrace and 

adapt to change, and hold ourselves accountable

for accomplishing meaningful results for the 

American public.

Treasury’s Mission 

Treasury’s mission is to maintain a strong economy and create economic and job opportunities 

by promoting the conditions that enable economic growth and stability at home and abroad, 

strengthen national security by combatting 

threats and protecting the integrity of the financial system, and manage the U.S. Government’s 

finances and resources effectively. 

Goal 1:

Boost U.S.

Economic Growth

Goal 4:

Transform

Government-wide

Financial Stewardship

Goal 5:

Achieve

Operational

Excellence

Goal 3:

Enhance

National

Security

Goal 2:

Promote

Financial

Stability

THE

D EPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

1789

To access the full Strategic Plan, visit www.treasury.gov/about/budget-performance
Strategic

Goal 

Strategic

 ObjectiveDomestic FinanceInternational AffairsTFI / FinCENTax PolicyTreasurerEconomic PolicyManagementIRSFiscal ServiceBEPU.S. MintTTBOCC

Goal 1:

Boost U.S. 

Economic 

Growth

1.1 Tax Law

Implementation

1.2 Strong Economic

Fundamentals 

1.3 Trusted Currency

and Services

1.4 Free and Fair Trade

Goal 2: 

Promote 

Financial 

Stability

2.1 Housing Finance

Reform

2.2 Foreign Exchange Practices

2.3 Foreign Technical

Assistance

2.4 Financial Sector Critical

Infrastructure & Cybersecurity

Goal 3: 

Enhance 

National 

Security

3.1 Strategic Threat Disruption

3.2 AML/CFT Framework

3.3 Economic Strength and 

National Security

Goal 4: 

Transform 

Governmentwide 

Financial 

Stewardship

4.1 Financial Data Access

and Use

4.2 Debt Management

4.3 Federal Financial

Performance

Goal 5: 

Achieve 

Operational 

Excellence

5.1 Workforce Management 

5.2 Treasury Infrastructure

5.3 Customer Value

and Experience

Department of the Treasury

Alignment of Organizations to Strategic Objectives

2018–2022

Objective 

Leads

Support

Organizations

Incorporated into Strategy 1.4.C based on FY19 

SOAR update—see page 42 of Strategic Plan

UPDATED FY19

UPDATED FY19

UPDATED FY20

UPDATED FY20

UPDATED FY20
EXHIBIT 32

                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Andy Teng, the Chief Executive Officer, of Northgate
Innovations, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, hereby
certifies that:

(i) the report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 17, 2003

                   /s/ Andy Teng
                   -------------------------
                   Andy Teng
                   Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification accompanied the Form 10-Q filing pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350. It is being reproduced herein for information only. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.