alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 43 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 43

      Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to require that 
congressional resolutions setting forth levels of total budget outlays 
   and Federal revenues must be agreed to by two-thirds vote of both 
  Houses of the Congress if the level of outlays exceeds the level of 
                               revenues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mr. Solomon introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to require that 
congressional resolutions setting forth levels of total budget outlays 
   and Federal revenues must be agreed to by two-thirds vote of both 
  Houses of the Congress if the level of outlays exceeds the level of 
                               revenues.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as a part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``On the question of agreeing, in either the House of 
Representatives or the Senate, to a concurrent resolution of the two 
Houses of the Congress which sets forth an appropriate level of total 
budget outlays of the Federal Government for a fiscal year and a 
recommended level of Federal revenues for that fiscal year or of 
agreeing, in either the House of Representatives or the Senate, to a 
report of a conference committee on such a concurrent resolution, the 
affirmative vote of two-thirds of Members present and voting (a quorum 
being present), shall be required for agreeing to the question, if the 
appropriate level of total budget outlays set forth in such concurrent 
resolution or recommended in such conference report exceeds the 
recommended level of Federal revenues set forth in such concurrent 
resolution or recommended in such conference report.''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the periods                indicated. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November                    13, 2007  |   | /s/ Guo                  Yan                             |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                        |   | Guo                  Yan                                      |   |
|                                                        |   | Chief                  Financial Officer                      |   |
|                                                        |   | (Principal                  Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 1 of 25 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 2 of 25 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 3 of 25 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 4 of 25 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 5 of 25 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 6 of 25 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 7 of 25 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 8 of 25 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 9 of 25 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 10 of 25 PageID 10
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 11 of 25 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 12 of 25 PageID 12
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 13 of 25 PageID 13
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 14 of 25 PageID 14
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 15 of 25 PageID 15
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 16 of 25 PageID 16
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 17 of 25 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 18 of 25 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 19 of 25 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 20 of 25 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 21 of 25 PageID 21
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 22 of 25 PageID 22
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 23 of 25 PageID 23
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 24 of 25 PageID 24
Case 4:22-cv-00741-O Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 25 of 25 PageID 25
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 304 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 304

           Designating May 1994 as ``Older Americans Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1994

Mr. Hughes (for himself and Mr. Regula) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
           Designating May 1994 as ``Older Americans Month''.

Whereas older Americans have contributed many years of service to their 
        families, their communities, and the Nation;
Whereas the population of the United States contains a large percentage of older 
        Americans, who have a wealth of knowledge and experience;
Whereas older Americans should be acknowledged for the contributions they 
        continue to make to their communities and the Nation; and
Whereas many States and communities acknowledge the contributions of older 
        Americans during the month of May: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in recognition of the 
traditional designation of the month of May as ``Older Americans 
Month'' and the repeated expression by the Congress of its appreciation 
and respect for the achievements of older Americans and its desire that 
older Americans continue to play an active role in the life of the 
Nation, May 1994 is designated as ``Older Americans Month'', and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
on the people of the United States to observe the month with 
appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-3325

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Marrion Dotson, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 14, 2012

Filed: May 22, 2012

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Marrion Dotson directly appeals after he pled guilty to kidnaping and firearm

charges and the district court1

 imposed a within-Guidelines-range sentence. His

counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), noting that Dotson’s plea agreement contained an appeal waiver, and

raising sentencing issues. Dotson has filed a pro se supplemental brief, raising issues

related to the district court’s conduct at the change-of-plea hearing and related to his

sentence.

1

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.
We conclude that the appeal waiver in the plea agreement is enforceable as to

Dotson’s pro se arguments challenging the district court’s conduct at the change-ofplea hearing. See United States v. Jennings, 662 F.3d 988, 990 (8th Cir. 2011) (appeal

waiver is generally enforceable if appeal falls within scope of waiver, both waiver and

plea agreement were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and enforcement of

waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). Accordingly, we do not consider

those arguments. 

We further conclude that the appeal waiver is not enforceable with respect to

the sentencing issues raised in the briefs, because those issues are not within the scope

of the waiver. More specifically, the parties waived their rights to appeal sentencing

issues on the condition, among others, that the court accept the Guidelines total

offense level to which the parties had agreed. That condition was not met. However,

after careful review, we conclude that none of the sentencing issues raised in the briefs

have merit. Dotson’s own admission of facts abundantly supported the district court’s

sentencing determinations, and the court adequately considered the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Stroud, 673 F.3d 854, 862 (8th Cir. 2012)

(district court is not required to recite § 3553(a) factors mechanically, but it must be

clear that court considered them).

Finally, having independently reviewed the record consistent with Penson v.

Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002. 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant toSection 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-QSB of Andean Development Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Jose Luis Yrarrazaval, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 15, 2003
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 131 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res. 131

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  Designating December 7 of each year as ``National Pearl Harbor 
Remembrance Day''.

Whereas, on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy and Air Force 
  attacked units of the armed forces of the United States stationed at 
  Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;
Whereas more than 2,000 citizens of the United States were killed and 
  more than 1,000 citizens of the United States were wounded in the 
  attack on Pearl Harbor;
Whereas the attack on Pearl Harbor marked the entry of the United 
  States into World War II;
Whereas the veterans of World War II and all other people of the United 
  States commemorate December 7 in remembrance of the attack on Pearl 
  Harbor; and
Whereas commemoration of the attack on Pearl Harbor will instill in all 
  people of the United States a greater understanding and appreciation 
  of the selfless sacrifice of the individuals who served in the armed 
  forces of the United States during World War II: Now, therefore, be 
  it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That December 7 of each year 
is designated as ``National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day'' and the 
President is authorized and requested--
        (1) to issue annually a proclamation calling on the people of 
    the United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies 
    and activities; and
        (2) to urge all Federal agencies, and interested organizations, 
    groups, and individuals, to fly the flag of the United States at 
    halfstaff each December 7 in honor of the individuals who died as a 
    result of their service at Pearl Harbor.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Jeffrey A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		May 16, 2005
Case 4:22-cr-00073-O Document 105 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 234
Case 4:22-cr-00073-O Document 105 Filed 04/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 235
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000942124
<NAME> AG ASSOCIATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,607
<SECURITIES>                                     4,675
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                       903
<INVENTORY>                                      9,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,125
<PP&E>                                          15,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,814
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,703
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,558
<SALES>                                         33,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,653
<CGS>                                           23,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,798)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,461)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.73)
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

IH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GAVINA CHAVEZ-VILLEGAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73243

Agency No. A075-744-962

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Gavina Chavez-Villegas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order granting the government’s

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting cancellation of removal. 

FILED

APR 16 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IH/Research 2 07-73243

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

constitutional questions and questions of law, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324

F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir. 2003), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the

petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that

Chavez-Villegas failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. See

Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

Chavez-Villegas’s contention that the BIA violated her due process rights by

disregarding her evidence of hardship is not supported by the record and does not

amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See id. (“traditional abuse of discretion

challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable

constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

Contrary to Chavez-Villegas’s contention, the BIA’s application of the

hardship standard falls within the broad range authorized by statute. See RamirezPerez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 1001, 1004 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 25418.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of' Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of' whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry-area; the penalty is a fine of $200.00.

In the absence of a proper notice of appeal in the record, this court is without, jurisdiction to consider the same.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
To: Christopher Starnes MD AME April 16, 2015 

From: Drone Services Hawaii 

Subject: Authorization Letter 

This letter is to authorize George K. Purdy, of Drone Services Hawaii, 98-1827A Kaahumanu St., Aiea, Hi 

96701, Cell phone (808)559-0175, Phone (808)225-2968, Fax (808)445-1954, online access for Starnes 

Aviation LLC section 333 exemption document Process. 

c ~ /-~~ - 

ChristopherStarnes MD AME
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            R-B RUBBER PRODUCTS, INC.
                      CALCULATIONS OF NET INCOME PER SHARE




                              Three Months Ended March 31,
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              1997                      1996
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Primary    Fully Diluted  Primary    Fully Diluted
                              ------------------------  ------------------------

Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding for the Period    2,172,500    2,172,500    2,172,500    2,172,500

Dilutive Common Stock
Options Using the Treasury
Stock Method                     48,525       48,525        1,495        1,495
                              ------------------------  ------------------------
Total Shares Used for Per
Share Calculations            2,221,025    2,221,025    2,173,995    2,173,995
                              ------------------------  ------------------------
                              ------------------------  ------------------------
Net Income (Loss)               120,251      120,251        4,116        4,116
                              ------------------------  ------------------------
                              ------------------------  ------------------------
Net Income (Loss) Per Share   $    0.05    $    0.05    $    0.00    $    0.00
                              ------------------------  ------------------------
                              ------------------------  ------------------------