alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 401

Designating the months of March 1995 and March 1996 as ‘‘Irish-American

Heritage Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 11, 1994

Mr. MANTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the months of March 1995 and March 1996

as ‘‘Irish-American Heritage Month’’.

Whereas 150 years ago, the blight that struck Ireland’s potato crop (‘‘the single root that changed the history of

the world’’), known as the Great Famine, caused

2,000,000 of Ireland’s population to emigrate, mostly to

America’s shores;

Whereas in 1847 alone, 25,000 Irish immigrants arrived in

Boston;

Whereas by 1851, the end of the famine exodus, 1,712 emigrant ships had sailed up the Narrows into New York

harbor;
2

•HJ 401 IH

Whereas during the ‘‘Great Hunger’’ (1845–1851) more people left Ireland than had emigrated in the previous 250

years;

Whereas within a few years of their arrival in the United

States, these Irish immigrants took jobs as laborers, built

railroads, canals, and schools, dedicated themselves to

help build this Nation, and this same legacy remains a

part of today’s American mainstream;

Whereas James Smith, George Taylor, Matthew Thornton,

and Charles Thomson, 4 of the individuals who signed

the Declaration of Independence, were Irish born and 9

other signers were of Irish ancestry;

Whereas Irish-born James Hoban designed and supervised

the building of the White House and its restoration after

it was burned in 1814;

Whereas more than 200 Irish-Americans have been awarded

the Congressional Medal of Honor;

Whereas 19 Presidents of the United States proudly claim

Irish heritage, included among them, the first President,

George Washington;

Whereas John W. O’Beirne, Founder of the American Foundation for Irish Heritage, first requested in 1990 that

Congress designate March as ‘‘Irish-American Heritage

Month’’; and

Whereas the 44,000,000 Americans of Irish ancestry, like

their forebearers, continue to enrich all aspects of life in

the United States, in science, education, art, agriculture,

business, industry, literature, music, athletics, military

and governmental service: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HJ 401 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the months of March 1995 and March 1996 are des4 ignated as ‘‘Irish-American Heritage Month’’. The Presi5 dent is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation

6 calling upon the people of the United States to observe

7 these months with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 30 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 30

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution allowing an item veto in 
                            appropriations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mr. Ewing (for himself, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Hastert, Mr. 
 Packard, Mr. Goss, Mr. Allard, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Herger, Mr. Zeliff, Mr. 
 Emerson, Mr. King, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. 
Crapo, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Upton, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
   Hutchinson, Mr. Lewis of Florida, and Mr. Talent) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution allowing an item veto in 
                            appropriations.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after its submission to the States for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The President may approve, disapprove, or reduce any item of 
appropriation in the same appropriation bill. In such case he shall, in 
signing the bill, designate the items disapproved and the items 
reduced, and shall return a copy of such items, with his objections, to 
the House in which the bill shall have originated. The same proceedings 
shall then be had as in the case of other bills disapproved by the 
President, except that in the case of items disapproved or reduced it 
shall take approval by three-fifths of each House to become law.''.

                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2016

s0919

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2016

152028

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152028

COA: 324584

Mecosta CC: 07-006086-FC

TROY MICHAEL GUZIKOWSKI,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Comer (Docket No. 152713) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00310-L

§

ANTONIO SEQURA-MONTOYA (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

ANTONIO SEQURA-MONTOYA is hereby adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), namely, Illegal Reentry After Removal 

from the United States. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 18th day of September, 2023.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00310-L Document 21 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 31
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Maryland Refinery Vacuum Distillation Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Maryland Refinery Vacuum Distillation Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 13,800 | 14,300 | 14,300 | 14,300 | 14,300 | 0      | 0      |       
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 70-7005]


Consideration of an Exemption From Requirements of 10 CFR Part 70 
for Waste Control Specialist LLC

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Consideration of an exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) 
is considering issuance of an Order pursuant to section 274f of the 
Atomic Energy Act that would exempt Waste Control Specialist LLC (WCS) 
from certain NRC regulations. WCS requested this exemption in a letter 
dated September 25, 2000. The proposed exemption would allow WCS, under 
specified conditions, to possess waste containing special nuclear 
material (SNM), in greater mass quantities than specified in 10 CFR 
part 150, at WCS's facility located in Andrews County, Texas, without 
obtaining an NRC license pursuant to 10 CFR part 70. NRC issued a 
similar Order to Envirocare of Utah, Inc. in May of 1999. During the 
issuance of that Order, the Commission indicated that staff should 
consider similar requests from others prior to exploring rulemaking in 
this area (SRM-SECY-98-226).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The WCS facility is approximately 1200 acres 
in size and is located in western Texas, approximately 32 miles west of 
Andrews, Texas. WCS is licensed by the State of Texas Department of 
Health to treat and temporarily store low-level radioactive waste. WCS 
is also licensed by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to dispose of hazardous 
waste. The hazardous waste activities at the site are not subject to 
the Order currently under consideration.
    Prior to the issuance of the Order, NRC will have made findings 
required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and NRC's 
regulations. These findings will be documented in a Safety Evaluation 
Report and an Environmental Assessment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy E. Harris, Environmental and 
Performance Assessment Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of 
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone: (301) 415-6613. Fax.: 
(301) 415-5397.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of November 2000.
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas H. Essig,
Chief, Environmental and Performance Assessment Branch, Division of 
Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 00-29725 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# AGENCY:

 Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury 

# ACTION:

 Notice 

# SUMMARY:

 An open meeting of the Midwest Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 

# DATES:

 The meeting will be held Thursday, February 24, 2000, and Friday, February 25, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sandra McQuin at 1-888-912-1227, or 414-297-1604. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a working meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel (CAP) will be held Thursday, February 24, 2000, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Friday, February 25, 2000, from 9:00 a.m. to Noon at Courtyard Marriott, Meeting Room B, 300 W. Michigan Street, Milwaukee, WI. The Citizen Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Written comments can be submitted to the panel by faxing to (414) 297-1623, or by mail to Citizen Advocacy Panel, Mail Stop 1006 MIL, 310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221. The Agenda will include the following: Various IRS issue updates and reports by the CAP sub-groups, presentation of taxpayer issues by individual members, CAP office report, and discussion of issues. 

# Note:

 Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could prevent effective advance notice.

Dated: February 1, 2000.

John J. Mannion, 

Program Manager, Taxpayer Advocate Service.

[FR Doc. 00-2964 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00070-Z-BR

§

KAMRON DARREL DOUGLAS-COLEMAN (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

KAMRON DARREL DOUGLAS-COLEMAN (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 

261 (5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of 

the Indictment. After cautioning and examining KAMRON DARREL DOUGLAS-COLEMAN (1) under oath concerning 

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the 

offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I 

therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that KAMRON DARREL DOUGLAS-COLEMAN (1) be 

adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) - CONVICTED FELON IN POSSESSION OF A FIREARM and

have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: January 4, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00070-Z-BR Document 33 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 59
OFFICE OF THE ATT’ ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN **o- c.**  **MAN*** **Anen ”**  **Rv .Umn** . . .‘Thi8 i8 thr 

## t'mrdrorsta1 abuti attd th UP

ma text OLtw 

## of ttlo 

## 14rt @tOtOt! 8-m w 

## St&o, TS Tax*Irr.

u. 1 l@lJ ?t%%&W VI btatd, 

## Al80see Pollal

code, Mt.. ,
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H on orabl e P hi l i p M . P ro, D i stri ctJudg e f or the U . S . D i stri ct ** * C our tf orN e va da , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J ES US RODRI GU EZ , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10291 D . C . N o. 2: 04 -c r- 00 38 7-M C E -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl a nd, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r28, 2011 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: T H O M A S and C L IF T O N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and P R O , D i stri ctJudg e. *** T he pa r t i e s a gr e e thi s m a tt e rs houl d be r e m a nde d t o the E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof C al i forni a f

or consi dera t i on of a new tri al m ot i on base d o n n ew l y di sc ov er ed 

# FI LED DE C 07 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS- 2-

e v id e n c e p r io rto th is C o u r t r e s o lv in g th e is s u e s in th is ap p e a l. T h e p a r tie s d is p u te on l y w hether the C ou rtshou l d rea ss i gn thi s m att eron re m and. T he C ou rtdeni es the re qu es tt o rea ss i gn , as there i s no evi dence of pers on al bi as and n o u nu sual c ir c u m s ta n c e s e x is t to s u p p o r t r e a s s ig n m e n t. McSherr y v . C i t y of L on g B each , 423 F .3 d 1 0 1 5 , 1 0 2 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ; H e rn a n dezv . C ity o

f E l Mo n te , 138 F . 3d 393, 402 (9th C i r. 19 98 ). A l l i ss ues r ai se d i n A pp el l ant ’ s O peni ng B ri ef i n thi s app ea l ar e pres erved for l at erappeal i n the eventthe di stri ctcourtdeni es the m ot i on for new tr ia l. RE MAND E D.
# C_2004275EN.01S00301.xml

| 10.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT: 


RESIDENTIAL DISHWASHERS, DEHUMIDIFIERS, AND COOKING PRODUCTS 


AND COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASHERS 

CHAPTERS 

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 

CHAPTER 2 ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK 

CHAPTER 3 MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 

CHAPTER 4 SCREENING ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 5 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 6 ENERGY AND WATER USE DETERMINATION 

CHAPTER 7 MARKUPS FOR EQUIPMENT PRICE DETERMINATION 

CHAPTER 8 LIFE-CYCLE COST AND PAYBACK PERIOD ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 9 TRIAL STANDARD LEVELS 

CHAPTER 10 SHIPMENTS ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 11 NATIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 12 LIFE-CYCLE COST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 13 MANUFACTURER IMPACT ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 14 UTILITY IMPACT ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 15 EMPLOYMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER 16 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 

CHAPTER 17 REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS 

APPENDICES 

APPENDIX 5A AHAM DATA SUBMITTAL 

APPENDIX 8A USER INSTRUCTIONS FOR LCC AND PBP SPREADSHEET 

APPENDIX 8B UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY 

APPENDIX 8C LIFETIME DISTRIBUTIONS 

APPENDIX 10A RELATIVE PRICE ELASTICITY OF DEMAND FOR APPLIANCES 

APPENDIX 11A USEER INSTRUCTION FOR SHIPMENTS AND NIA SPREADSHEET 

APPENDIX 11B NATIONAL EQUIPMENT AND OPERATING COSTS 

APPENDIX 13A THE LOW-VOLUME MANUFACTURER 

APPENDIX 13B GOVERNMENT REGULATORY IMPACT MODEL (GRIM) 

APPENDIX 13C FEDERAL PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT 

APPENDIX 14A INTERPOLATION OF UTILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS 

FROM NEMS-BT OUTPUT 

APPENDIX 17A REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS SUPPORTING MATERIAL 

TOC-i 


EERE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 66.2