alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,982,597
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,716,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               260,008
<PP&E>                                         303,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (87,120)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,057,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          354,959
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       282
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,522,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,057,428
<SALES>                                        909,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               943,025
<CGS>                                          221,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                483,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                   50,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            433,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   433,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .22
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-05-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          21,116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    135,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               312,520
<PP&E>                                         336,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 675,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,130
<BONDS>                                        192,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           297
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   675,587
<SALES>                                        378,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               378,089
<CGS>                                          262,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  350,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    16
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,635
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTS BASIC EPS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:22-cr-00252-P Document 89 Filed 12/28/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 152
Case 4:22-cr-00252-P Document 89 Filed 12/28/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 153
# Official Journal L 105/26 A

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 105 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4826 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 105

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4826 April 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 629/2005 of 25 April 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 630/2005 of 25 April 2005 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Jordan | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 629/2005 of 25 April 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 630/2005 of 25 April 2005 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Jordan

3

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 305/04/COL of 1 December 2004 amending for the 48th time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by amending Chapter 16 ‘Aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty and proposal for appropriate measures’ (OJ L 97, 15.4.2005) | 5 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2000/3/EC of 22 February 2000 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 77/541/EEC relating to safety belts and restraint systems of motor vehicles (OJ L 53, 25.2.2000) | 5 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 305/04/COL of 1 December 2004 amending for the 48th time the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by amending Chapter 16 ‘Aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty and proposal for appropriate measures’ (OJ L 97, 15.4.2005)

5

*

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2000/3/EC of 22 February 2000 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 77/541/EEC relating to safety belts and restraint systems of motor vehicles (OJ L 53, 25.2.2000)

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Dear Jake,

Aerial Imaging Systems SUAVs are multi
- rotorcraft DJI Phantom 2 Vision aircraft with digital gyroscope stabilization and GPS, Phantom 2 vision weight (including Lipo battery, (4) props, and payload) is 3.557 lbs., weighting 55 lbs or less. Max flight speed is 15 m/s, accent 6 m/s, decent 2 m/s. The phantom 2 vision has the capability to hover and move in the vertical and horizontal plane i ndependently/simultaneously. If any additional imformation is needed to process this exemption please email me at scottecarlson459@gmail.com. Thanks for your time.
Scott Carlson Aerial Imaging Systems
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 297 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 297

           To designate 1994 as ``The Year of Gospel Music''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 1993

 Mr. Cooper (for himself and Mr. Flake) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
           To designate 1994 as ``The Year of Gospel Music''.

Whereas Gospel music is a uniquely American art form, one that has provided hope 
        and inspiration for generations of Americans;
Whereas Gospel music is the forerunner of many forms of popular music in the 
        United States;
Whereas Gospel music is an important art form, and a vital part of our cultural 
        heritage; and
Whereas it is in our national interest to promote and preserve Gospel music for 
        generations of Americans to come: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That 1994 is designated ``The 
Year of Gospel Music'', and that the President is authorized and 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to mark that year with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 370 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 370

        Designating May 25, 1995, as ``National Tap Dance Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1994

   Mr. Conyers introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
        Designating May 25, 1995, as ``National Tap Dance Day''.

Whereas the multifaceted art form of tap dancing is a manifestation of the 
        cultural heritage of our Nation, reflecting the fusion of African and 
        European cultures into an exemplification of the American spirit that 
        should be, through documentation and archival and performance support, 
        transmitted to succeeding generations;
Whereas tap dancing has had a historic and continuing influence on other genres 
        of American art, including music, vaudeville, Broadway musical theater, 
        and film, as well as other dance forms;
Whereas tap dancing is perceived by the world as a uniquely American art form;
Whereas tap dancing is a joyful and powerful aesthetic force providing a source 
        of enjoyment and an outlet for creativity and self-expression for 
        Americans on both the professional and amateur level;
Whereas it is in the best interest of the people of our Nation to preserve, 
        promote, and celebrate this uniquely American art form;
Whereas Bill ``Bojangles'' Robinson made an outstanding contribution to the art 
        of tap dancing on both stage and film through the unification of diverse 
        stylistic and racial elements; and
Whereas May 25, as the anniversary of the birth of Bill ``Bojangles'' Robinson, 
        is an appropriate day on which to refocus the attention of the Nation on 
        American tap dancing: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 25, 1995, is 
designated ``National Tap Dance Day''. The President is authorized and 
requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United 
States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                      <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 13 , 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00328

- CV

In the Matter of M. O., Appellant

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED

-- OPIN ION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the adjudication of

the juvenile court: IT IS THEREFORE considered , adjudged and ordered that the adjudication

of the juvenile court is in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that

appellant has filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs, it is FURTHER ordered that no costs of

appeal be assessed agai nst appellant; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMEzuCA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-061-02-H

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TTIE UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(b)(1), the undersigred District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedFebruary ?\ ,zozz.

J WESLEY HE zux

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

JOSE DAVID FLORES,

Defendant.

Case 1:22-cr-00061-H-BU Document 61 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 134
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 205

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 27 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning October 31, 1993, as

‘‘National Health Information Management Week’’.

Whereas accurate, timely, and complete medical records and

related health information are vital in planning and providing for quality health care for the people of the

United States;

Whereas such records and information are vital to providing

health care to an individual beginning at the birth of the

individual and continuing throughout the life of the individual;

Whereas public concern about the quality, appropriateness,

and effectiveness of health care is escalating;
2

•HJ 205 RDS

Whereas specific skills in evaluating and reporting the results

of health care are required to provide public accountability;

Whereas equitable third-party reimbursement for health care

is dependent on health information that is collected, analyzed, classified, verified, and disseminated;

Whereas public awareness of patient rights, including the

right of a patient to access the patient’s own medical information, is increasing;

Whereas the needs and requirements for health information

of the health care industry and the use of the information

by the industry are changing rapidly;

Whereas the rate of such changes will continue to increase

as new health care technology is used and new health

care reform policies are promulgated;

Whereas the 35,000 members of the American Health Information Management Association are the health information leaders of the United States; and

Whereas such members have demonstrated commitment to,

and expertise in, health information management: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning October 31, 1993, is designated

4 as ‘‘National Health Information Management Week’’,

5 and the President is authorized and requested to issue a

6 proclamation calling on the people of the United States
3

•HJ 205 RDS

1 to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and

2 activities.

Passed the House of Representatives October 26,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
# CE2004065EN.01009501.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/95 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/95

---

(2004/C 65 E/107)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1847/03

by Luigi Vinci (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(3 June 2003)

Subject:   Compliance with the SEIA directive in connection with the Milan-Bergamo-Brescia super-highway construction project

Subject:

Pursuant to the Commission's recent directive on strategic environmental impact assessment (SEIA (1)), any plans for the construction of major new items of transport infrastructure must be accompanied by an assessment of all practicable alternatives (so that the one which will have least impact on the environment can be chosen) and the involvement of the local people affected, their associations and the local authorities, so that the necessary information can be provided and local people's opinions sought.

1

However, this right to access information and to express views has been (and is still being) denied in the case of the plans (promoted by the Italian Government) for a Milan-Bergamo-Brescia super-highway (known as the Mibebre highway), since the local people, associations and authorities know only what has appeared in the press.

Furthermore, what has so far been revealed through the press is particularly worrying: the super-highway will apparently damage or destroy cultural artefacts and natural features, including four regional parks. These include the valuable Naviglio Martesana, which is in the process of being recognised as a Unesco world heritage site.

In view of the above, does the Commission not think that it should take action vis-à-vis the Italian Government with a view to ensuring that, in the case of the Mibebre project, the SEIA directive and EU environmental laws in general are observed and enforced?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2003)

(17 July 2003)

Directive 2001/42/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment establishes, in its Article 13, that Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive before 21 July 2004.

At this stage, therefore, this Directive is not applicable, nor has Italy yet communicated to the Commission the measures adopted in order to comply with it.

Apart from the above-mentioned Directive, the information given by the Honourable Member has not revealed any specific grounds of complaint on the application of other Community environmental provisions to the specific case. Therefore, in the light of the above, no breach of Community environmental legislation can be identified at present.

---

(1)  Directive 2001/42/EC, OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 30.

1

---
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor 

Attn: Anthony Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor 

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE: Annual Statement as toCompliance 

WFCM 2015 C29

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Poolingand Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of theCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C29, as an authorizedofficer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCBSpecial Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereofthat:

 

a. A review of the activities ofthe NCB Special Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of myknowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Special Servicer has fulfilled allobligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2017.

 

 

Best regards, 

 

 

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance 

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
#### SIMMONS v. STATE.

No. 25967.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1952.

*953No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the 'State. '

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was charged with possession of unstamped liquor. Hé waived trial by jury and entered his plea of “guilty” before the court. Plis punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The record contains neither a statement of facts nor 'bills of exception. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Official Journal C 85/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 85 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6313 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 85

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6313 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 85/01 | Common Military List of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 85/01

Common Military List of the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 33.13












REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA





For the calendar year
ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the "Servicer").

National Tax Search,
LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1, 2015 through
December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of
the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR"), NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer
to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (I)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii),
1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria")
are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that
the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the,SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs
with respect to the transactions covered by this rePort. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made
on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions").

NTS, as a vendor, has
assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied,
in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect
to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran,
PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



National Tax Search LLC, as Vendor to Servicer



Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 18, 2016