alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,685
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     85,733
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          71,463
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            69,754
<LOANS>                                        339,046<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 536,363
<DEPOSITS>                                     394,605
<SHORT-TERM>                                    59,030
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,978
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 536,363
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,366
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,485
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   374
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,225
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,067
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,610
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,615
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      270
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 138
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,388
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,388
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,729
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.54
<LOANS-NON>                                          8
<LOANS-PAST>                                       263
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   106
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,279
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      697
<RECOVERIES>                                       258
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,110
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,110
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Includes mortgages available-for-sale and net of allowance
for loan losses of $5,110.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### CUDDY v. STATE.

No. 26113.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft and assessed punishment at one year in jail and a fine of $250.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		May 10, 2004
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 100

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to provide for a balanced budget

for the United States Government and for greater accountability in

the enactment of tax legislation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to provide for

a balanced budget for the United States Government

and for greater accountability in the enactment of tax

legislation.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
2

HJ 100 IH

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission

3 to the States for ratification:

4 ‘‘ARTICLE—

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. Prior to each fiscal year, the Congress

6 and the President shall agree on an estimate of total re7 ceipts for that fiscal year by enactment into law of a joint

8 resolution devoted solely to that subject. Total outlays for

9 that year shall not exceed the level of estimated receipts

10 set forth in such joint resolution, unless three-fifths of the

11 total membership of each House of Congress shall provide,

12 by a rollcall vote, for a specific excess of outlays over esti13 mated receipts.

14 ‘‘SECTION 2. Whenever actual outlays exceed actual

15 receipts for any fiscal year, the Congress shall, in the en16 suing fiscal year, provide by law for the repayment of such

17 excess. The public debt of the United States shall not be

18 increased unless three-fifths of the total membership of

19 each House shall provide by law for such an increase by

20 a rollcall vote.

21 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

22 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

23 United States Government for that fiscal year in which

24 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.
3

HJ 100 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become

2 law unless approved by a majority of the total membership

3 of each House by a rollcall vote.

4 ‘‘SECTION 5. The provisions of this article are waived

5 for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in

6 effect.

7 ‘‘SECTION 6. Total receipts shall include all receipts

8 of the United States except those derived from borrowing.

9 Total outlays shall include all outlays of the United States

10 except for those for repayment of debt principal.

11 ‘‘SECTION 7. This article shall take effect beginning

12 with fiscal year 1995 or with the second fiscal year begin13 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
Case 4:22-cr-00223-O Document 27 Filed 08/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 33
Case 4:22-cr-00223-O Document 27 Filed 08/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 34
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                     STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                 HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC., GENERAL PARTNER OF
                      HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited
Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Ronald P. Gibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Operating Partnership.

  /s/ Ronald P. Gibson
-------------------------------------------
Ronald P. Gibson
President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
August 14, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. l:22-CR-020-01-H

TOMAS BURCIAGA-GUERRA,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GTJILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OX1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedMay L( ,2922

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

I.INITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

C!".rt>

Case 1:22-cr-00020-H-BU Document 26 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         274,447
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  893,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,191
<INVENTORY>                                    919,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,152,819
<PP&E>                                       6,291,052
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,854,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,864,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,107,646
<BONDS>                                      1,236,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,797,442
<OTHER-SE>                                     969,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,864,183
<SALES>                                      1,925,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,925,690
<CGS>                                        1,165,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,165,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               552,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,018
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            132,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   132,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
#### ROOSTH v. POTH.

No. 11276.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 24, 1943.

Mayfield & Lee, of Tyler, for appellant.

Jack Pope, of Corpus Christi, for appel-lee.

NORVELL, Justice.

Appellant has filed a motion for leave to file brief after his time has expired under Rule No. 414, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. This motion is contested by appel-lee.

We have concluded that we can not or need not consider these motions as we have no jurisdiction of this attempted appeal other than to order its dismissal. 3 Tex. Jur. 104, § 52.

Appellee brought this action against appellant in his individual capacity, and also in his capacity as trustee, and some sixteen additional defendants.

From the recitations of an order dated September 21, 1942, it appears that the trial court rendered a judgment by default against all defendants except Harold Roosth, who was dismissed; but that before such judgment was entered of record it was set aside as to all parties defendant, except as to Sam Roosth in his individual capacity. This order of September 21, 1942, then purports to enter a judgment for title and possession of certain lands and premises in favor of appellee and against Sam Roosth.

Roosth moved to vacate this judgment, and on October 8, 1942, the trial court overruled his motion to vacate as well as ap-pellee’s motion for judgment against all parties defendant other than Sam Roosth.

The order recites that notice of appeal was given by Sam Roosth.

It is apparent that no final appealable judgment has been rendered in the cause. There is no judgment disposing of all parties before the trial court, and the record contains no interlocutory order from which an appeal is permitted by statute.

The attempted appeal is therefore dismissed. McClaren Rubber Co. v. Williams Auto Supply Company of Big Spring, Tex. Civ.App., 81 S.W.2d 255, 3 Tex.Jur. 114, § 56.

Appeal dismissed.
Agenda -- February 2009 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings Thursday, January 29, 2009 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 p.m. Wednesday, 

January 28 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and Scott.Sherman@ny.frb.org. Even if you are 

not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

Low/High 

January-March / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

April-June / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

FY 2009 / 

FY 2010 / 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

3-year note (Feb) 

3-year note (Mar/Apr) / 

10-year note 

10-year note reopening (Mar/Apr) / 

30-year bond / 

2-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

5-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

10-year TIPS (reopening) / 

5-year TIPS / 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill size (Feb/Mar/Apr(1)/Apr(2)) / / / / - / / / 

Total Change in bills outstanding Jan 09 – Mar 09 / 

Total Change in bills outstanding Apr 09 – Jun 09 / 

Total Change in bills outstanding FY 2009 / 

CMB issuance (size/date) / / / / 

Please provide your estimates in the format provided above with central estimates followed by low/high estimates for each issue. 

Discussion Topics 

1. In recognition of both short and long term financing needs, what adjustments to the auction 

calendar should Treasury make at this time? Please include potential implementation date, 

maturity term, frequency, and auction sizes. Are there additional tools Treasury should consider 

that would enhance debt management? 

2. What are your views on the effectiveness of the TIPS program from the perspective of an 

issuer given Treasury’s objective of the lowest cost of borrowing over time? Should Treasury 

consider changes to its TIPS program, including changing the maturity mix, issuance pattern, or 

issue sizes?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    155,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,748
<PP&E>                                         352,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 754,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          241,326
<BONDS>                                        249,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           294
<OTHER-SE>                                     208,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   754,802
<SALES>                                        218,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,865
<CGS>                                          156,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,119)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,205
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,433
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<FN>
<F1>Reflects basic EPS.
</FN> 
        

</TABLE>
Agenda -- May 2009 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings Thursday, April 23, 2009 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 p.m. Wednesday, April 22 

to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and Scott.Sherman@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled to meet 

with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

Low/High 

April-June / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

July-September / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

FY 2009 Total Marketable Borrowing / 

FY 2010 Total Marketable Borrowing / 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

FY 2009 / 

FY 2010 / 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

3-year note (May/Jun/Jul) / / / / - / / 

10-year note (May) / 

10-year note reopening (Jun/Jul) / / - / 

30-year bond (May) / 

30-year bond reopening (Jun) / 

2-year note (May/Jun/Jul) / / / / - / / 

5-year note (May/Jun/Jul) / / / / - / / 

7-year note (May/Jun/Jul) / / / / - / / 

10-year TIPS (Jul) / 

20-year TIPS (reopening) (Jul) / 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill size (May/Jun (1) & Jun (2)/Jul) / / / / / / - / / / 

Total Change in bills outstanding Apr 09 – Jul 09 / 

Total Change in bills outstanding FY 2009 / 

CMB issuance Apr 09 – Jul 09 (size/date) / / / / 

Please provide your estimates in the format provided above with central estimates followed by low/high 

estimates for each issue. 

Discussion Topics 

1. In recognition of short, intermediate, and long term financing needs, as well as recent estimates 

provided by the Office of Management and Budget and other agencies, what adjustments to debt 

issuance, if any, should Treasury make in consideration of each of these horizons in terms of 

adjustments to size, frequency, or debt instruments? 

2. Discuss the impact on market liquidity and dynamics given the recent decision by the Federal Reserve 

to purchase Treasury securities as well as additional mortgage backed securities. 

3. Given the issuance of Agency debt, Term Liquidity Guaranteed Paper, global sovereign debt, and 

other potential debt instruments, describe the dynamics surrounding Treasury auctions as well as 

potential methods to minimize the cost of borrowing while maximizing market liquidity.
# Official Journal C 231A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.231.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 231A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 569 August 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.231.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 231A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 569 August 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2013/C 231A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/169/S | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2013/C 231A/01

Recruitment notice PE/169/S

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 183 | (IT) |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 204 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 210 | (LV) |
| 211 | (PL) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | |
| 231 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

183

(IT)

191

192

193

194

196

197

199

200

204

(DE/EN/FR)

210

(LV)

211

(PL)

219

227

231

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 2:22-cv-00131-Z-BR Document 10 Filed 05/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 44