alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 389

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the second Sunday in October of 1994 as

‘‘National Children’s Day’’.

Whereas the people of the United States should celebrate

children as the most valuable asset of the Nation;

Whereas children represent the future, hope, and inspiration

of the United States;

Whereas the children of the United States should be allowed

to feel that their ideas and dreams will be respected because adults in the United States take time to listen;
2

•HJ 389 RDS

Whereas many children of the United States face crises of

grave proportions, especially as they enter adolescent

years;

Whereas it is important for parents to spend time listening

to their children on a daily basis;

Whereas modern societal and economic demands often pull

the family apart;

Whereas encouragement should be given to families to set

aside a special time for all family members to engage together in family activities;

Whereas adults in the United States should have an opportunity to reminisce on their youth to recapture some of

the fresh insight, innocence, and dreams that they may

have lost through the years;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the United States will provide an opportunity to

emphasize to children the importance of developing an

ability to make the choices necessary to distance themselves from impropriety and to contribute to their communities;

Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the children of the Nation will emphasize to the people of the

United States the importance of the role of the child

within the family and society;

Whereas the people of the United States should emphasize to

children the importance of family life, education, and

spiritual qualities; and

Whereas children are the responsibility of all Americans, thus

everyone should celebrate the children of the United

States, whose questions, laughter, and tears are impor-
3

•HJ 389 RDS

tant to the existence of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the second Sunday in October of 1994 is designated

4 as ‘‘National Children’s Day’’, and the President of the

5 United States is authorized and requested to issue a proc6 lamation calling upon the people of the United States to

7 observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activi8 ties.

Passed the House of Representatives September 30,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES

223 AND 1006 AND APPROVING 

REVISION OF THE NOTE TO 

RULE 225 OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 639

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2016, upon the recommendation of the Civil 

Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been submitted without publication 

pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b):

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of 

Pennsylvania that Rules 223 and 1006 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure are

amended, and the revision of the Note to Rule 225 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil 

Procedure is approved, as set forth in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and 

shall be effective immediately.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,711
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             212
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,872
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,874
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,921
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,981
<LOANS>                                         54,107
<ALLOWANCE>                                        765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,394
<DEPOSITS>                                      77,040
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,276
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                735
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           309
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  87,394
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,564
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  237
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   228
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,029
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,091
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,235
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,794
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       53
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    461
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       286
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   167
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   776
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       66
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  765
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               765
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
U
. S
. D e part m ent of Tr a nsp o rtati o n National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

# Memorandum

S u bjec t : Do c ke t Submi ss ion ofTechnical R e port , "T ec hni c a l Analy s i s Supp o rtin g th e N PRM to Updat e E le ctri ca l S a f e ty Re quire m e nt s in FMVSS N o. 305
. 'E lec tri c -p o were d ve hicl es; e lec tro lyt e s pilla g e and e le ctric s h oc k pro t ec ti o n "' Date : 

## MAR 0 8 2016

## L~**ri** K. Su mm e r s • 

# Ilk. 

# J{JL___ Direc to r 

# X/ From : Offi ce o f C ras h w orthin ess Stand ard s

To :**o1~1') o.**  N HTSA- 2 0 1 6-0029 Thr u :

# a~~**au h**  A 

# , r

f)

- C hi e f C oun se l
T h e t ec hni ca l r e p o rt , "Te chnic a l An a lys i s S upp o rtin g th e NPRM to U pd ate E l ec tri ca l S af e t

y R e quir e m e nt s in F MVSS N o. 30 5, 'E lect ri c -p owe r e d v ehicl es; e l e ctr o ly te s pill age a nd e lec tri ca l s h o ck pr o t e cti o n ,"' i s a tt ached f o r inclu s ion into th e re f e re nc e d p u b li c d oc ket. T hi s d ocu m e nt pro v id es a te chni ca l a na l ys i s o f dire c t and indirec t c ont a ct p ro tec ti o n f o r hi g h vo lt age so ur c e s s pecifi e d in Glob a l Tec hni ca l R eg ul a ti o n No. 1 3 an d th ose r e qu es te d by th e A ut o A lli a n ce in it s p e tition fo r rul e m a kin g. T hi s d oc um e nt i s be in g s ubmitt e d as s upp o rt in g in fo rm at io n fo r th e No ti ce o f Pro pose d Ru le makin g to upd a te th e e l ec tri cal sa f e ty req uire m e nt s in FM VSS N o. 3 0 5
. Pl ease s ubmit thi s m e morandum to D oc ke t N o. N HTSA

- 2 016

- 00 2 9. Atta c hm e nt: • T ec hnic a l An a lys i s Supportin g th e N PRM t o U pd a te E le c t r ic a l Sa fety R e quir e m e nt s in F MVSS N o. 3 0 5, "E le ctri c - p o w e r e d ve hicl es; e l ec tr o ly te s pill age a nd e lec tri c al s h oc k pr o t ec ti o n "
#### IRVING v. STATE.

No. 21676.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1941.

D. B. Patton, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of. Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for forgery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

The indictment appears regular. No bills of exception complaining of matters of procedure are presented by the record.

The purported statement of facts filed with the transcript bears the certificate of the court reporter. However, it is not signed by the attorneys for the State and the defendant; neither has it been approved by the trial judge. Without the approval of the trial court, we are precluded from considering the statement of facts. See cases cited under Note 24, Art. 760, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P., Vol. 3; Branch’s *760Ann.Tex.P.C., § 596; 4 Tex.Jur., p. 419, § 287; also Gandy v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 143 S.W.2d 392.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          -  50 CFR Part 660
          - [Docket No. 000831250-0250-01; 102500C]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION: 

Correction to the action closing the directed fishery for Pacific mackerel.

# SUMMARY:

This document contains a correction to the Pacific mackerel closure which was published on November 1, 2000.

# DATES:

Effective November 17, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James J. Morgan, Southwest Region, NMFS, 562-980-4036.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

                    The directed fishery for Pacific mackerel was closed at 12:01 a.m. on October 27, 2000, by publication of a document in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 1, 2000 (65 FR 65272).  The document contains an error that requires correction.                 

## Correction

In rule FR DOC. 00-28109, on page 65272, in the issue of Wednesday, November 1, 2000 (65 FR 65272), make the following correction: 

                    On page 65272, in the third column, under the heading                     **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                    , the last sentence is corrected to read as follows:                 

“For the reasons stated here and in accordance with the FMP and its implementing regulations at 50 CFR 660.509, the directed fishery for Pacific mackerel will be closed October 27, 2000, after which time no more than 20 percent by weight of a landing of Pacific sardine, northern anchovy, jack mackerel, or market squid may consist of Pacific mackerel.”

Authority:16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: November 9, 2000.

Bruce C. Morehead,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 00-29415 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE:  3510-22-S
JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.

4:22-cv-00691-O

the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia

400 6th Street NW, Suite 8100

Washington DC 20001

(202) 724-6609 (202) 741-0649

Caroline S. Van Zile

The District of Columbia and the States of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, California, Colorado, Connecticut, 

Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North 

Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and Wisconsin

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 52 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 667
the District of Columbia

1017942 9/9/2016

Pennsylvania Supreme Court 7/15/2013 Active (non-resident)

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Active

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals 2013 Active

U.S. District Court for D.C. 2016 Active

N/A

N/A

N/A

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 52 Filed 08/31/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 668
N/A N/A

William Thompson

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 6301Gaston Avenue, Suite 1428

Dallas Texas 75214

(737) 667-6100 (713) 221-7100

31 August 2022

Caroline S. Van Zile

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 52 Filed 08/31/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 669
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Clark/Balfour Beatty

- NCE, A Joint Venture ) ) Under Contract No. W912DR-07-C-0027 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 60550, 60551

Robert M. Moore, Esq. Robert D. Windus, Esq.

Moore & Lee, LLP McLean, VA Thomas J. Warren, Esq.

Acting Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Raymond 

### 0. Schlee, Esq.

Assistant District Counsel U.S. Army Engineer District, Baltimore ORDER OF DISMISSAL By motion filed on 12 December 2017, the partiesjointly moved for the dismissal ofthese appeals and the corresponding government affirmative claims with prejudice. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. Dated: 14 December 2017 

## J.REI OUTY Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60550, 60551, Appeals of Clark/Balfour Beatty

- NCE, A Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: 

### DEC 1 52017 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 186

To designate June 5, 1993, as ‘‘National Trails Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 27, 1993

Mr. SCHAEFER (for himself and Mr. VENTO) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Post

Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate June 5, 1993, as ‘‘National Trails Day’’.

Whereas trails and footpaths have been an integral part of

America’s history, providing opportunities for recreation,

exercise, and transportation;

Whereas trails provide an alternative transportation system

at both local and metropolitan levels;

Whereas trails offer outdoor activity for the millions of Americans who walk, bicycle, ride, backpack, ski, and hunt;

Whereas, by the year 2000, more than 80 percent of the Nation’s population will reside in urban areas and rec-
2

HJ 186 IH

reational opportunities which are close to home will be a

priority;

Whereas trails enrich our Nation’s communities by showcasing areas of scenic beauty, historic significance, and ecological diversity;

Whereas an organized trails system contributes to the economic vitality of a community through increased property

values and regional tourism;

Whereas trails provide educational opportunities for people of

all ages to observe nature and to increase awareness

about and appreciation of our natural environment; and

Whereas a ‘‘National Trails Day’’ will strengthen support for

our national trails system on local, State and national

levels: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That June 5, 1993, is designated as ‘‘National Trails

4 Day’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

5 a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

6 States to observe this day with appropriate programs and

7 activities.

Æ
# Official Journal C 273/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 273 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6318 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 273

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6318 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 273/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9759 – Nexi/Intesa Sanpaolo (Merchant Acquiring business)) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 273/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9839 — VGRD/Auto Wichert Assets) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 273/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9759 – Nexi/Intesa Sanpaolo (Merchant Acquiring business)) (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 273/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9839 — VGRD/Auto Wichert Assets) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 273/03 | Euro exchange rates — 17 August 2020 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 273/03

Euro exchange rates — 17 August 2020

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 273/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9922 – GHO/MIC/Envision) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2020/C 273/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9864 — CPPIB/KKR/Axel Springer) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2020/C 273/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9776 – Worldline/Ingenico) (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 273/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9922 – GHO/MIC/Envision) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2020/C 273/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9864 — CPPIB/KKR/Axel Springer) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2020/C 273/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9776 – Worldline/Ingenico) (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## OCT 2 2 2012 James Uoldstene Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Walker, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered November 6, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence upon him as a persistent violent felony offender.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*526Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the trial court properly denied his application to proceed *pro se.*When such a request is made after commencement of the trial, a defendant is not entitled to proceed *pro se*absent compelling circumstances *(see, People v McIntyre,*36 NY2d 10; *People v Branch,*155 AD2d 473). Here, the defendant’s application was untimely, as it was not made until after completion of the People’s direct case. The record fails to reveal compelling circumstances which would have warranted granting his application, particularly in view of his disruptive behavior throughout the proceedings.

The defendant failed to object at trial to the allegedly improper cross-examination of him by the prosecutor. Consequently, this issue is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05; *People v Watts,*154 AD2d 723), and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. With respect to the defendant’s claim of prejudice resulting from the prosecutor’s summation, we note that the court issued a curative instruction with respect to one of the remarks, and, in the absence of any further objection, must be deemed to have corrected the error to the defendant’s satisfaction *(see, People v Williams,*46 NY2d 1070). We find that the remaining challenged remarks did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial, as they were responsive to the defense counsel’s summation and did not exceed the bounds of fair comment on the evidence *(see, People v Rivera,*158 AD2d 723).

The People met their burden of proof that the defendant was a persistent violent felony offender *(see,*CPL 400.16), and the defendant’s contention that the determination was based on inadmissible evidence is without merit. We do not find the sentence imposed to be excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). The defendant’s remaining contention with respect to the court’s questioning of him is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Eiber, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Case 5:22-cr-00093-H-BV Document 52 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID 40
Case 5:22-cr-00093-H-BV Document 52 Filed 03/02/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID 41