70562 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 227 / Friday, November 24, 2000 / Notices

1. Penalty levels under non-extreme

conditions

2. Reasons for scheduling variances

3. Information for shippers on scheduling

variances

4. Trading of scheduling variances

5. SCT scheduling variances

6. Crediting of penalty revenues

B. Flexible Point Rights

1. Approval process for original requests

for service

2. Approval process for release transactions

with request for alternative primary

points

3. Five-day waiting period

4. Effect of alternate primary points on

original primary points

5. Termination of alternate points

6. Default provision for nominated

quantities in excess of CD in overlapping

segments

7. Point rights within 100-mile segments

but outside the primary path

C. Imbalance Services

1. Information provided to shippers on a

daily basis

2. Cost of imbalance management services

3. Imbalance netting and trading—

operational impact areas

4. Delivery variance service

5. Third-party imbalance management

services

D. OFOs

1. When an OFO will be used

2. Panhandle’s powers under an OFO

3. Amount of notice

E. Segmentation

1. Areas in which segmentation is not

operationally feasible

F. Discount Provisions

1. Extension of discounts to other points

The above schedule may be changed

as circumstances warrant.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–29952 Filed 11–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project Nos. 4678–019, 4679–022]

Power Authority of the State of New

York; Notice of Availability of Final

Environmental Assessment

November 17, 2000.

A final environmental assessment

(FEA) is available for public review. The

FEA was prepared for New York Power

Authority’s (licensee) application to

operate the Crescent and Vischer Ferry

Hydroelectric Projects in a run-of-river

mode.

In summary, the FEA examines the

environmental impacts of three

alternatives for operating the Crescent

and Vischer Ferry Projects: (1) licensee’s

proposed action: run-of-river operation;

(2) licensee’s initial proposed action:

limited ponding; and (3) no-action.

These alternatives are described in

detail in the FEA.

The FEA recommends that the

licensee operate the projects in a run-ofriver mode in accordance with the

licensee’s proposed action alternative.

The FEA concludes that implementation

of this alternative would not constitute

a major federal action significantly

affecting the quality of the human

environment.

This FEA was written by staff in the

Office of Energy Projects (OEP). Copies

of the FEA can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s Public

Reference Room at (202) 208–1371.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–29996 Filed 11–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

Notice of Intent To File an Application

for a New License

November 17, 2000.

a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to

File An Application for a New License.

b. Project no.: 289.

c. Date filed: November 3, 2000.

d. Submitted by: Louisville Gas and

Electric Company—current licensee.

e. Name of project: Ohio Falls

Hydroelectric Project.

f. Location: On the Ohio River in the

City of Louisville, Jefferson County,

Kentucky. The project is located at the

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’

McAlpine Locks and Dam.

g. Filed pursuant to: Section 15 of the

Federal Power Act.

h. Licensee contact: Bill Bosta,

Director, Louisville Gas and Electric

Company, 220 West Main Street, P.O.

Box 32010, Louisville, KY 40232 (502)

627–2359.

i. FERC contact: John Costello,

john.costello@ferc.fed.us, (202) 219–

2914.

j. Effective date of current license:

September 1, 1981.

k. Expiration date of current license:

November 10, 2005.

l. Description of the project: The

project consists of the following existing

facilities: (1) A powerhouse containing

8 generating units having a total

installed capacity of 80,320 kW, located

at the U.S. Corps of Engineers’

McAlpine Locks and Dam; (2) a 632-

foot-long, 26-foot-high concrete

headworks section built integrally with

the powerhouse; (3) a 0.9-mile-long, 69-

kV transmission line; (4) an access road;

(5) one half-mile-long railroad tracks;

and (6) other appurtenances.

m. Each application for a new license

and any competing license applications

must be filed with the Commission at

least 24 months prior to the expiration

of the existing license. All applications

for license for this project must be filed

by November 10, 2003.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–29949 Filed 11–22–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

Notice of Intent To File an Application

for a New License

November 17, 2000.

a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent To

File an Application for a New License.

b. Project No.: 7387.

c. Date filed: October 23, 2000.

d. Submitted by: Erie Boulevard

Hydro, LP—current licensee.

e. Name of project: Piercefield

Hydroelectric Project.

f. Location: On the Raquette River

near the towns of Piercefield and

Altamount, in St. Lawrence and

Franklin Counties, New York. The

project does not occupy federal lands.

g. Filed pursuant to: Section 15 of the

Federal Power Act.

h. Licensee contact: Jerry L. Sabattis,

Erie Boulevard Hydropower, LP, 225

Greenfield Parkway, Suite 201,

Liverpool, NY 13088 (315) 413–2787.

i. FERC contact: Charles T. Raabe,

charles.raabe@ferc.fed.us, (202) 219–

2811.

j. Effective date of current license:

November 1, 1955.

k. Expiration date of current license:

October 31, 2005.

l. Description of the project: The

project consists of the following existing

facilities: (a) A dam in five sections

comprising: (1) A 360-foot-long, 10-foothigh earthen dike along the right bank

(north bank); (2) a 62.5-foot-long

concrete sluice structure; (3) a 70-footlong, 20-foot-high earthen dike having a

concrete core wall; (4) a 118-foot-long

stanchion type stop log spillway; and (5)

a 294-foot-long, 22-foot-high concrete

spillway with a crest elevation of

1,540.0 feet USGS surmounted by 2-

foot-high flashboards; (b) a 140-footlong, 45-foot-wide, 17-foot-deep

concrete masonry forebay structure; (c)

a reservoir having a surface area of 370