alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Supplemental MOVES Modeling Files

The seven (7) zip files contained in the “Supplemental MOVES Modeling Files,” submitted as part of the Connecticut PM 2.5 redesignation SIP are available electronically upon request. Please direct all request to: Donald O. Cooke, Environmental Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA New England Regional Office Office of Ecos ys tem Protection, Air Qualit y Planning Unit 5 Post Office Square - Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05 - 2) Boston, MA 02109 - 3912 Telephon e (617) 918 - 1668 Fax # (617) 918 - 0668 E - Mail cooke.donald@epa.gov 1. MOVES_input_FF2009_and_CALEV_to_MYSQL .zip 2. MOVES_input_FF2017_and_FF2025_to_MySQL .zip 3. MOVES_input_NH2009_and_Earl yLEV_to_MYSQL .zip 4. MOVES_input_NH2017_and_NH2025_to_My SQL .zip 5. MOVES_MSAccessOutputAnaly sisDB_To_My SQL.zip 6. MOVES_FF_NH_PM_RunOutputs_to_My SQL .zip 7. MOVES_RunSpec_BatchInfo_AndRunLog_To_C_Windows7.zip
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund Limited Partnership and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      66,754,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  304,683<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,080,974<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,080,974<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,330,326<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,930,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,600,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,600,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,600,178)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $304,683.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $7,021,995.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $1,262,316, accrued
management fees of $188,409, and administrative expenses payable
of $163,519.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(4,934,411),
net change in unrealized of $5,420,056 and interest income of $2,844,681.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### Cooper-Rutter Associates, Inc., Respondent, v Anchor National Life Insurance Co. et al., Appellants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered February 27, 1990, as denied those branches of their motion which were for a protective order with respect to two items sought by the plaintiff during pretrial disclosure, identified by the defendants as items numbered 57 and 65 on a schedule of purportedly privileged documents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

This appeal concerns so much of an order of the Supreme Court as denied the defendants’ motion for a protective order with respect to two documents sought by the plaintiff during pretrial disclosure. Based upon our in camera review of the disputed documents, two handwritten memoranda prepared by an individual who was both in-house counsel and corporate secretary to one of the defendants, we conclude that the defendants did not sustain their burden of establishing that the documents were shielded by the attorney-client privilege *(see, Matter of Priest v Hennessy,*51 NY2d 62, 68-69). The documents, prepared more than six months prior to the commencement of the instant action, concern both the business and legal aspects of the defendants’ ongoing negotiations with the plaintiff with respect to the business transaction out of which the underlying lawsuit ultimately arose. As such, the documents were not primarily of a legal character, but expressed substantial nonlegal concerns *(see, Rossi v Blue Cross*
      *664
      *& Blue Shield,*73 NY2d 588; *Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena [Bekins Record Stor. Co.],*62 NY2d 324; 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac § 4503.05). Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly determined that the documents were not shielded by the attorney-client privilege and therefore were discoverable. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 367

To provide a Congressional Medal to the courageous citizen who exposed

the conspiracy to murder millions of Americans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1994

Mr. STARK introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide a Congressional Medal to the courageous citizen

who exposed the conspiracy to murder millions of Americans.

Whereas one or more tobacco companies have known for decades that cigarette smoking is addictive and threatens

the health and life of its users;

Whereas one or more tobacco companies have continued to

market tobacco products for financial gain in spite of

their knowledge that tobacco products are addictive and

threaten the health and life of their users;

Whereas concealing this information is, in fact, a conspiracy

to murder millions of Americans;
2

HJ 367 IH

Whereas someone has made public some of these concealed

documents, thus potentially helping save millions of

Americans in the future;

Whereas one tobacco company and its law firm are seeking

to punish the whistleblower through legal action; and

Whereas anyone with any common sense recognizes that the

true criminals are those who concealed evidence that they

were plotting the murder of millions of Americans and

that the person who exposes this plot is displaying a true

sense of civic duty which should be rewarded: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress shall bestow a Congressional Medal of

4 Appreciation for Public Spirit to the courageous citizen

5 who made the concealed documents public.

Æ
# Official Journal C 1/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 504 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 1

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 504 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 001/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2007/C 001/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 001/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2007/C 001/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 001/03 | Notice | s3 |

2007/C 001/03

Notice

Notice

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 3:22-cr-00105-S Document 25 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 61
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33948 
(Sub-No. 1)]


Union Pacific Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--The 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempts the trackage rights 
described in STB Finance Docket No. 33948 \1\ to permit the trackage 
rights to expire on February 15, 2001, in accordance with the agreement 
of the parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On October 13, 2000, the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) 
filed a notice of exemption under the Board's class exemption 
procedures at 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). The notice covered the agreement 
by The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) to 
grant temporary overhead trackage rights to UP over 235 miles of 
BNSF's rail line between BNSF milepost 885.2 near Bakersfield, CA, 
and BNSF milepost 1120.54 near Stockton, CA. See Union Pacific 
Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--The Burlington Northern 
and Santa Fe Railway Company, STB Finance Docket No. 33948 (STB 
served Oct. 26, 2000). The trackage rights agreement is scheduled to 
expire February 15, 2001. The trackage rights operations under the 
exemption were scheduled to be consummated on October 20, 2000.

DATES: This exemption will be effective on December 22, 2000. Petitions 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
to reopen must be filed by December 12, 2000.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33948 (Sub-No. 1) must be filed with the Surface 
Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of all 
pleadings must be served on petitioner's representative, Robert T. 
Opal, 1416 Dodge Street, Room 830, Omaha, NE 68179.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar (202) 565-1600. (TDD 
for the hearing impaired 1-800-877-8339.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: Da-To-Da Office Solutions, Suite 210, 
1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 289-4357. 
(Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
1-800-877-8339.)
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at http://WWW.STB.DOT.GOV. 

    Decided: November 14, 2000.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Burkes, and 
Commissioner Clyburn.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29726 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 8 PageID 37
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 8 PageID 38
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 3 of 8 PageID 39
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 4 of 8 PageID 40
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 5 of 8 PageID 41
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 6 of 8 PageID 42
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 7 of 8 PageID 43
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 23 Filed 03/23/22 Page 8 of 8 PageID 44
#### Joe PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23104.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 21, 1945.

S. F. Hill, of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for robbery by assault. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing the same. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 1 of 10 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 2 of 10 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 3 of 10 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 4 of 10 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 5 of 10 PageID 21
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 6 of 10 PageID 22
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 7 of 10 PageID 23
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 8 of 10 PageID 24
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 9 of 10 PageID 25
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 3 Filed 03/24/22 Page 10 of 10 PageID 26
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 374

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating August 2, 1994, as ‘‘National Neighborhood

Crime Watch Day’’.

Whereas neighborhood crime is of continuing concern to the

American people;

Whereas the fight against neighborhood crime requires people

to work together in cooperation with law enforcement

officials;

Whereas neighborhood crime watch organizations are effective at promoting awareness about, and the participation

of volunteers in, crime prevention activities at the local

level;
2

•HJ 374 RFS

Whereas neighborhood crime watch groups can contribute to

the Nation’s war on drugs by helping to prevent their

communities from becoming markets for drug dealers;

and

Whereas citizens across America will soon take part in a

‘‘National Night Out’’, a unique crime prevention event

which will demonstrate the importance and effectiveness

of community participation in crime prevention efforts by

having people spend the period from 9 to 10 o’clock

postmeridian on August 2, 1994, with their neighbors in

front of their homes: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That August 2, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Neigh4 borhood Crime Watch Day’’, and the President is author5 ized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon

6 the people of the United States to observe such day with

7 appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) Oak Ridge. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires 
that public notice of these meeting be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Wednesday, December 13, 2000, 6:00 p.m.-9:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Comfort Inn, 433 South Rutgers Avenue, Oak Ridge, TN.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Halsey, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-
922, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-9121 or 
e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#721a131e01170b0218321d001d5c161d175c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dfb7beb3acbaa6afb59fb0adb0f1bbb0baf1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas 
of environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: 1. An overview of the current and planned 
activities for cleanup of the East Tennessee Technology Park will be 
provided by representatives from the Department of Energy/Oak Ridge 
Operations.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Pat Halsey at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments at the end of the meeting.
    Minutes: Minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Department of Energy's Information Resource 
Center at 105 Broadway, Oak Ridge, TN between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. 
Monday through Friday, or by writing to Pat Halsey, Department of 
Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-922, Oak Ridge, 
TN 37831, or by calling her at (865) 576-4025.

    Issued at Washington, DC on November 16, 2000.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29734 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# CA2005135EN.01000101.xml

| 2.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 135/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 135/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
----

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1212/2005 des Rates vom 25. Juli 2005 zur Einführung eines endgültigen Antidumpingzolls auf die Einfuhren von bestimmten Gusserzeugnissen mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 199 vom 29. Juli 2005)

Seite 3, Erwägungsgründe 15, 16 und 17:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

Seite 26, Artikel 1 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„(1)   Auf die Einfuhren von Gusserzeugnissen aus nicht verformbarem Gusseisen von der zur Abdeckung von und/oder zum Zugang zu Leitungen auf oder unter der Erde verwendeten Art und Teile davon, auch maschinell bearbeitet, beschichtet oder überzogen oder anders bearbeitet, ausgenommen Feuerhydranten, mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China, die derzeit den KN-Codes 7325 10 50, 7325 10 92 und ex 7325 10 99 (TARIC-Code 7325109910) zugewiesen werden, wird ein endgültiger Antidumpingzoll eingeführt.“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Auf die Einfuhren von Gusserzeugnissen aus nicht verformbarem Gusseisen von der zur Abdeckung von und/oder zum Zugang zu ober- oder unterirdischen Systemen verwendeten Art und Teile davon, auch maschinell bearbeitet, beschichtet oder überzogen oder anders bearbeitet, ausgenommen Feuerhydranten, mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China, die derzeit den KN-Codes 7325 10 50, 7325 10 92 und ex 7325 10 99 (TARIC-Code 7325109910) zugewiesen werden, wird ein endgültiger Antidumpingzoll eingeführt.“

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6875

PERCELL RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; LOUIS

NEWSOME,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-284-5-BR)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percell Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Percell Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Richardson v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correction,

No. CA-98-284-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 13, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 15 PageID 685
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 2 of 15 PageID 686
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 3 of 15 PageID 687
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 4 of 15 PageID 688
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 5 of 15 PageID 689
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 6 of 15 PageID 690
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 7 of 15 PageID 691
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 8 of 15 PageID 692
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 9 of 15 PageID 693
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 10 of 15 PageID 694
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 11 of 15 PageID 695
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 12 of 15 PageID 696
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 13 of 15 PageID 697
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 14 of 15 PageID 698
Case 3:22-cv-01844-S Document 37 Filed 02/28/23 Page 15 of 15 PageID 699
##### 



Exhibit 32. 1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valrico Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
E. Bob Mclean, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ John E. Bob Mclean
President and CEO
August 16, 2004
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Keith C. Valentine, President and Chief Executive Officer of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:


1.the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:March 6, 2018/s/ Keith C. ValentineKeith C. ValentineChief Executive Officer