alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex1019.htm












LOAN AGREEMENT







July 9, 2015







Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) of Parcela 29, Perales Viejo Vallenar, III Region Chile, advanced USD$16,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 74 N. Pecos Road, Suite D, Henderson, NV, 89074.  The Lender advanced the funds on July 9, 2015.







The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) from July 9, 2015.  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.







 


The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.


 


LENDER                                                                          BORROWER


Richard N. Jeffs                                                                    Cell MedX Corp.







Per:                                                                            Per:







/s/ Richard N. Jeffs                                                                 /s/ Yanika Silina


Richard N. Jeffs                                                                      Yanika Silina, CFO
















  





1











  








PROMISSORY NOTE







Principal Amount:  USD$16,000                                                                                                                                July 9, 2015












For value received Cell MedX Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum of $16,000 lawful money of United States (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from July 9, 2015 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.







For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.







The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.







The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.












BORROWER


Cell MedX Corp.







Per:







/s/ Yanika Silina


Yanika Silina, CFO








  





2
# L_2013225EN.01S00301.xml

| 23.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 225/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 225/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 157

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate September 13, 1993, as ‘‘Commodore John

Barry Day’’.

Whereas the United States of America is a nation of immigrants and the contributions of Irish immigrants and

their descendants to the defense of the public liberty has

been a hallmark of Irish Americans;
2

HJ 157 RDS

Whereas during the War for Independence Captain John

Barry, a native of County Wexford, Ireland, achieved the

first victory for the Continental Navy while in command

of the ship ‘‘Lexington’’ by capturing the British ship

‘‘Edward’’, organizing General George Washington’s

crossing of the Delaware River which led to the victory

at Trenton in 1776, transported gold from France to

America while in command of the ship ‘‘Alliance’’, and

achieved the last victory of the war for the Continental

Navy while in command of ‘‘Alliance’’ by defeating the

British ship HMS ‘‘Sybille’’;

Whereas during the War for Independence Captain John

Barry rejected British General Lord Howe’s offer to

desert the Continental Navy and join the British Navy,

stating: ‘‘Not the value and command of the whole British fleet can lure me from the cause of my country.’’;

Whereas after the War for Independence the United States

Congress recognized John Barry as the premier American naval hero of that war;

Whereas in 1787 Captain John Barry organized the compulsory attendance of members of the Pennsylvania Assembly in Philadelphia, thus ensuring the quorum necessary

to call a Convention and recommend the ratification of

the Constitution;

Whereas on June 14, 1794, pursuant to ‘‘Commission No.

1’’, President Washington commissioned John Barry as

commodore in the new United States Navy;

Whereas Commodore John Barry helped to build and lead

the new United States Navy which included his command

of the U.S.S. ‘‘United States’’ and the U.S.S. ‘‘Constitution’’ (‘‘Old Ironsides’’);
3

HJ 157 RDS

Whereas Commodore John Barry is recognized along with

General Stephen Moylan in the Statue of Liberty Museum as one of six foreign-born great leaders of the War

for Independence;

Whereas in 1991 and 1992 President George Bush proclaimed September 13 as ‘‘Commodore John Barry Day’’;

and

Whereas designating a day to commemorate Commodore

John Barry would be important to United States Navy

veterans, Irish Americans, and to all the people of the

United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 13, 1993, is designated as ‘‘Commodore

4 John Barry Day’’, and the President of the United States

5 is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe such day

7 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives August 5,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
April 19, 2017

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | First Mining Finance Corp. (the
      Company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                      
|    | Consent of Expert                               
|    |                                                 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by
reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2016.

I, Mark Liskowich, P.Geo., of SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.,
hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my
involvement in the preparation of the following technical report:

Preliminary Economic Assessment for
the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada dated October 7, 2016 (the
Technical Report).

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ Mark
      Liskowich, P.Geo.Mark Liskowich, P.Geo.Principal Consultant, GeoenvironmentalSRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 195

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding

presidential election voting rights for residents of United States territories.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1993

Mr. DE LUGO (for himself, Mr. EDWARDS of California, Mr. FILNER, Mr.

FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. MFUME, Mr. SABO, Mr. SERRANO, Mr.

PENNY, Mrs. MINK, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. CLAY, Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois,

Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. RAHALL, Ms. WATERS, Mr. RANGEL,

Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. BERMAN, Mrs. MEEK, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. VENTO, Mr. DE LA GARZA, Mr. GONZALEZ,

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. DELLUMS, and Mr. UNDERWOOD) introduced

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States regarding presidential election voting rights for

residents of United States territories.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con-
2

•HJ 195 IH

1 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

2 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

3 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

4 States within seven years after the date of its submission

5 for ratification:

6 ‘‘ARTICLE—

7 ‘‘SECTION 1. The right of citizens of the United

8 States to vote in the election for President and Vice Presi9 dent shall not be denied or abridged by the United States

10 or by any State on account of residency in a territory of

11 the United States.

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en13 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION No 261/2005

of 16 February 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 43/2003 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulations (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001 and (EC) No 1454/2001 as regards aid for the local production of crop products in the outermost regions of the European Union

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1452/2001 of 28 June 2001 introducing specific measures for certain agricultural products for the French overseas departments, amending Directive 72/462/EEC and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 525/77 and (EEC) No 3763/91 (Poseidom) (1), and in particular Articles 5(2), 12(4), 13(4), 15(7), 18 and 22 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1453/2001 of 28 June 2001 introducing specific measures for certain agricultural products for the Azores and Madeira and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1600/92 (Poseima) (2), and in particular Articles 5(3), 6(5), 16(2), 19, 21(3), 27, 28(3), 30(5) and 34 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1454/2001 of 28 June 2001 introducing specific measures for certain agricultural products for the Canary Islands and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 (Poseican) (3), and in particular Articles 9(2), 10(5) and 20 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 43/2003 is hereby replaced by the following:

‘Article 68

Notifications

1.   The Member States concerned shall send the Commission each year:

2.   The Member States shall inform the Commission immediately of cases which they recognise as force majeure or exceptional circumstances justifying continued entitlement to the aid.’

Article 2

Entry into force and application

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 198, 21.7.2001, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1690/2004 (OJ L 305, 1.10.2004, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 198, 21.7.2001, p. 26. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1690/2004.

(3)OJ L 198, 21.7.2001, p. 45. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1690/2004.

(4)OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1137/2004 (OJ L 221, 22.6.2004, p. 3).

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALICIA GUESS,

Appellant,

v.

ABERDEEN GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, INC., a Florida not-for-profit

corporation,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-139

[March 29, 2023]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Marni A. Bryson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-CC003331-XXXX-SB.

Morgan L. Weinstein of Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellant.

Robert Rivas of Sachs Sax Caplan, PL, Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lloyd S. Meisels, P.A. v. Dobrofsky, 341 So. 3d 1131, 

1134-36 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (affirming summary judgment where 

appellant neither responded to the motion for summary judgment nor 

supplied a hearing transcript on appeal, and recognizing that, pursuant 

to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c)(5), the requirement of filing a 

response is mandatory and, if one is not filed, rule 1.510(e) “provides 

discretionary options for the trial court,” including “grant[ing] summary 

judgment if the motion and supporting materials – including the facts 

considered undisputed – show that the movant is entitled to it”); Simmons 

v. Pub. Health Tr. of Miami-Dade Cnty., 338 So. 3d 1057, 1061 (Fla. 3d 

DCA 2022) (determining that transcripts of trial court statements meet the 

rule 1.510(a) requirement that the trial court state on the record the 

reasons for granting or denying summary judgment motion); Johnson v. 

Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. Ams., 248 So. 3d 1205, 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2018) (observing that although “a lack of a transcript, in and of itself, will 

not necessarily prohibit appellate review of the evidence underlying a 

summary judgment ruling, it could in some cases stymie the fullness of a 
2

legal argument challenging that ruling on appeal if there is a question 

about whether the argument was preserved”).

GROSS, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00065-Z-BR

§

RICKY PETER NUANHNGAM (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

RICKY PETER NUANHNGAM (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining RICKY PETER NUANHNGAM (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned 

in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by 

an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea 

of guilty be accepted, and that RICKY PETER NUANHNGAM (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 

924(a)(2) - CONVICTED FELON IN POSSESSION OF A FIREARM and have sentence imposed accordingly. After 

being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: September 6, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 31 Filed 09/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 65
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R.L. Smith, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Gregory R. L. Smith
| | Gregory R. L. Smith    
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | November 12, 2010      

---
United States Court of Appeals

FIFTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

LYLE W. CAYCE

CLERK

TEL. 504-310-7700

600 S. MAESTRI PLACE, 

Suite 115

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

November 20, 2023

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW:

No. 23-10718 VanDerStok v. Garland

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691

Enclosed is an order entered in this case.

 Sincerely,

LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk

 By: _________________________

Roeshawn Johnson, Deputy Clerk

504-310-7998

Mr. Brian A Abbas

Mr. William V. Bergstrom

Mr. Connor McCarthy Blair

Mr. J. Mark Brewer

Mr. Paul D. Clement

Mr. Richard Brent Cooper

Mr. Dennis Daniels

Ms. Courtney Dixon

Mr. Chad Flores

Ms. Kathleen R. Hartnett

Mr. Sean Janda

Mr. Adam M. Katz

Ms. Karen S. Mitchell

Ms. Erin Murphy

Mr. Anthony Roman Napolitano

Mr. Marc A. Nardone

Mr. Stephen Obermeier

Mr. Peter A. Patterson

Mr. Brian Daniel Poe

Mr. James Wallace Porter III

Mr. Daniel M. Riess

Mr. Matthew Rowen

Mr. Matthew Joseph Smid

Mr. Mark Bernard Stern

Mr. Michael J. Sullivan

Mr. John Parker Sweeney

Mrs. Jennifer L. Swize

Mr. David H. Thompson

Mr. Cody J. Wisniewski

Ms. Abby Christine Wright

Case: 23-10718 Document: 00516974329 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 271-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5296
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

and 

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING GROUP, 

INC.; et al., 

Intervenor-Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O 

 

PLAINTIFF TACTICAL MACHINING, LLC’S NOTICE OF 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL 

Plaintiff Tactical Machining hereby withdraws its Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal, 

Doc. 262 (Sept. 15, 2023). 

DATED this 24th day of October, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ R. Brent Cooper 

R. Brent Cooper (TX Bar No. 04783250) 

Benjamin D. Passey (TX Bar No. 24125681) 

COOPER & SCULLY, P.C. 

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 

Dallas, Texas 75202 

Telephone: (214) 712-9500 

Telecopy: (214) 712-9540 

brent.cooper@cooperscully.com 

ben.passey@cooperscully.com 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 267 Filed 10/24/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 5284
Cody J. Wisniewski* (CO Bar No. 50415) 

FPC ACTION FOUNDATION

5550 Painted Mirage Road, Suite 320 

Las Vegas, NV 89149 

Telephone: (916) 517-1665 

Facsimile: (916) 476-2392 

cwi@fpchq.org 

Brian Abbas* (AZ Bar No. 031866) 

MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION

2596 S. Lewis Way 

Lakewood, CO 80227 

Telephone: (303) 292-2021 

Telecopy: (877) 349-7074 

babbas@mslegal.org 

*Admitted pro hac vice 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 267 Filed 10/24/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 5285
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on October 24, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing using 

this Court’s CM/ECF system. 

 I certify that all participants in this case are registered CM/ECF users and service 

will be accomplished by this Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ R. Brent Cooper 

R. Brent Cooper 

COOPER & SCULLY, P.C. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 267 Filed 10/24/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 5286
Extension of Public Comment Period 

Documents 

(Updated November 22, 2013)