alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 305 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 305

         Designating April 28, 1994, as ``Exercise Tiger Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1994

 Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
         Designating April 28, 1994, as ``Exercise Tiger Day''.

Whereas the D-Day invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944, was one of the most 
        critical and heroic battles leading to the Allied victory over Nazi 
        Germany in World War II;
Whereas, on April 28, 1944, during the Exercise Tiger training mission for D-
        Day, the soldiers and sailors of Exercise Tiger were unexpectedly 
        attacked by a flotilla of German torpedo boats off the coast of Slapton 
        Sands, England;
Whereas 749 American soldiers were killed in the attack;
Whereas the heroic efforts of these soldiers have not been sufficiently 
        recognized in American history and the soldiers of Exercise Tiger have 
        not been appropriately honored for their great sacrifice in defending 
        the Nation; and
Whereas April 28, 1994, will be the 50th anniversary of the tragedy of Exercise 
        Tiger: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That April 28, 1994, is 
designated as ``Exercise Tiger Day'', and the President is authorized 
and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the 
United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies, 
activities, and programs.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


A.   The Employment Agreement dated as of June 12, 2000 between Meditrust
Corporation (the "Company") and David L. Rea (the "Executive") is hereby amended
by deleting all references to "Meditrust Corporation" and substituting therefor
"Meditrust Corporation and Meditrust Operating Company."

B.   The effective date of this Amendment shall be as of June 12, 2000.

         Executed this eighth day of August, 2000 by and among Meditrust
Corporation, Meditrust Operating Company and the Executive and in the case of
Meditrust Corporation and Meditrust Operating Company, by their duly authorized
officers.

                         MEDITRUST CORPORATION



                         By:
                               --------------------------------------
                               Title:

                         MEDITRUST OPERATING COMPANY



                         By:
                               --------------------------------------
                               Title



                               --------------------------------------
                                             David L. Rea
M aterial safety data sheets for Alcoa

, Massena, NY

Alcoa

Oxbow Calcining

, LLC

Koppers
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL D. WHALEY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

vs. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1638-B-BH

§

ZURICH AMERICAN §

INSURANCE CO., TEXAS §

DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE– §

DIVISION OF WORKERS’ §

COMPENSATION, and C.B.C.S. §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the federal law claims against the defendants

will be DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and any state law worker’s

compensation claims will be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

SIGNED this 7th day of November, 2023.

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01638-B-BH Document 15 Filed 11/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 74
### 0 5 / 15 /20 1 3 11 :00 FA X S 14 447 3747 CAS CS

**~** 

### 002/0 03 

# lnventoryExpertService A division ol the American Chemical Society



### Phone: **80~831·168_.,** 

### 614·447·Ba70 Faw
: 61 4-447·37-47 E-mail

: **answers@ca~J.org** 

### Web: www

. cas

. org/products/olher-ca&-produc:ts/cllent-service&J • . ,l 

### .=-·

' May 15, 2013 Henkel Corporation ATTN

: Mr . Louis Fabrizio One 

### Henkel Way 

### Rocky Hill, 

### CT 06067 

## D$8r

: Mr. Fabrizio:

•

'

.

. • . .. .

. •
.•. .

. · .. .' . . • • . **-...l<. ~--~**  •. ., .. '"'

, . - • "•: 

# .

' . , ' **-~·. -~**  **~~-** 

# ..... **,~~~~-~ ~~>1'-~**  **·-~"""'~lt** 

# ·-· -· ·· **Tl'farik YOti-fbt~urrrlWiiuny**  **~,.;pen ~ervrce**  **(l't:'t)}·l;'Jl'tll!TorMay09** '201 

### J . · · """

- 

### The processing results are attaclled. To

· ensure efficient **pn;,~ssihg** 

### of yout sl:fbstance(s

); It Is important that these results are included with your PMN report for when repottlng to the EPA. The cost 

## af the technical processing for your order will be applied to your MasterCard

. Thank you for the opportunity to provide \his service

. If you have any questions, please do **m::~t** hesitate to contaet me. 

### Sincerely, Jennifer Moore CAS 

### Client Services Enclosure(s) 

## CAS 2540 Olentangy 

### River Road


## P . O. Box 

## 3343 C<llumbus, OH 43210-0334 

# USA05/15

/ 20 1 3 11 :00 FA X 8 14 447 3747
CA S C S

**~** 003 / 00 3 

# lnven

· toryExpertService A dMslon of 1he American ChemiCal SoclAty

Phone

: 800-631·1884, 614-447·3870 FaX
: 814--44'7

· 3747 E - mllll
: lil19Wers®cils

. org Web: **www OI'g/tlil:ldllcWolher-cu·producrs/cllent-serviceal**  INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REllORT Registry Number: 103969•85·3 CA Index Name: 2·Propenolc acid, 4-phenoxybutyl ester 

### . . - · ·

· : - : . · - ... Please print the above CA lndeK Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. CAS

If this box is checked, CAS has **mad~** correctlon(s) marked in rlfd to your IES order. Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submittin

· g it to the EPA

. 2540 Olentangy River Road

P . O. Box 3343 COIOmbus, OH 4321 0·0334 USA
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title	:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 14, 2006
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 26143.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area, and his punishment assessed at one day in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### CHILDERS v. STATE.

No. 22751.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 9, 1944.

Scarborough, Yates & Scarborough, of Abilene, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $200 upon a charge of driving a motor vehicle on a public highway while intoxicated.

The State’s attorney has confessed error because he says that a careful study of the record discloses “that there are no facts or circumstances which show the offense was committed within the period of time as that the prosecution would not be barred by the statute of limitation.”

*794 We have been unable, from the statement of facts, to find any evidence as to the time the offense was committed. This was a necessary allegation in the complaint and it is one which must be proven. Womack v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 170 S.W.2d 478, 479.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Alyson M. Mount, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding I, L.L.C. (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.





Dated: March 29, 2017





By:  /s/ Alyson M. Mount


Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer


of Entergy New Orleans, Inc., as Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
# Official Journal C 99I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 099I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6326 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 099I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6326 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 99 I/01 | Communication from the Commission — Guidance to the Member States concerning foreign direct investment and free movement of capital from third countries, and the protection of Europe’s strategic assets, ahead of the application of Regulation (EU) 2019/452 (FDI Screening Regulation) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 99 I/01

Communication from the Commission — Guidance to the Member States concerning foreign direct investment and free movement of capital from third countries, and the protection of Europe’s strategic assets, ahead of the application of Regulation (EU) 2019/452 (FDI Screening Regulation)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7434

CHARLES CLAUDE RAMSEY, Petitioner

- Appellant,

v. KIMBERLY H. RUNION, Director of the Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. ( 2:11

- cv - 00396

- RBS

- FBS )

Submitted : March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Charles Claude Ramsey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7434 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Charles Claude Ramsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his
self

- styled motion to strike, which he filed 10 years after the district court deni ed relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and closed the case

. We construe Ramsey’s underlying
motion to strike as a second or successive § 2254 petition or, alternatively, a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the denial of his initial § 2254 petition

. Because Ramsey did not obtain prefiling authorizati on from this court to file such a motion, the district court lacked jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); United States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 397

- 400 (4th Cir. 2015)

. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
as unnecessary, see Harbison v. Bell , 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009), vacate the district court’s order, and remand with instructions for the district court to dismiss the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Ramsey’s motion to strike filed in this court and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMAND ED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7434 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000942788
<NAME> NEOPHARM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,402,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  319,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,721,736
<PP&E>                                         162,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,814,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,290,086
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,801
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,522,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,814,329
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,000,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,063,421
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,934,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,774,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,160,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,160,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0065

_________________ L. CRAIG SEMENZA,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HOLLISTER A. LARSON, et al., HOLLY JEAN LARSON, both individually and collectively d/b/a FIRST & MAI

N BUILDING, Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directe d to provide a copy hereof to L. Craig Semenza, to all counsel of r ecord , and to the Honorable Heidi J. Ulbricht , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Jim Rice Justice, Montana Supreme Court February 1 2023

02/01/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0065
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited Company (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





SKILLSOFT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANYDate: December 10, 2009
By:
/s/ Charles E. MoranCharles E. MoranChief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Andrew Marshall, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) | the annual report on Form 40-F of First Mining Finance
      Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2016 fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (b) | information contained in the Form 40-F fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of First Mining Finance Corp.                                                 

Date: April 19, 2017

/s/ Andrew
      MarshallAndrew MarshallChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and) Principal Accounting
      Officer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A2 00 5

. M J Q CONCOURSE, I NC. et a l

. v . ARCH SPECI ALTY I NSURANCE COMPANY.

On Feb ru ary 2 3
, 2 01 5
, t h e t ri al co u rt en t e r e d t w o o rd ers g ran ti n g p art i al

s u m m ary ju d g m en t i n fav o r o f d efen d an t Arch Sp eci al t y In s u ran ce Co m p an y i n t h i s d ecl arat ory ju d g m en t act i o n

. On M arch 3 0
, 2 0 1 5
, co -d efen d an t s M J Q Co n co u rs e, In c., Ben jam in Rh o a d e s , Ch ad Ph i l l i p s , an d Arm an d o Cel en t an o fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal t o t hi s Co u rt

. 1 W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

To b e t i m el y , a n o ti ce o f ap p eal m us t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 day s aft er en try o f t h e ap p eal ab l e o rd er. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro per an d t im el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s an ab s ol u t e req u i rem en t to co nfer ju ri s d i ct i on o n t hi s Co u rt . See Per l ma n

v. Per l m a n , 3 18 Ga. Ap p

. 7 3 1
, 7 3 9 ( 4 ) ( 7 3 4 SE2 d 56 0 ) (2 0 1 2 ); GMC Gr o u p v. Ha r sco Co r p

. , 29 3 Ga. Ap p

. 7 0 7 (6 6 7 SE2 d 91 6 ) (2 0 0 8 ). Becau s e t h e ap p el lan t s fi l ed
t h ei r n ot i ce o f ap p eal 3 5 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd ers t h ey wi sh to ap p eal
, t h i s ap p eal i s u n t i m el y . It i s t h erefo re DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 Th e no t i ce o f ap p eal was s ig n ed o n M arch 1 9
, 2 0 1 5
, b u t

– fo r reas o n s t h at are

n o t cl ear fro m th e reco rd

– w as n o t s t am p ed “ fi l ed ” un t i l M arch 3 0
, 2 0 1 5

. Ap p el l an t s al s o fi led an am en d ed n ot i ce o f ap p eal o n M arch 3 0 , 2 01 5

. 07/09/2015 July 09, 2015
Case 3:22-cv-01704-G Document 3 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 25
Case 3:22-cv-01704-G Document 3 Filed 08/08/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 26
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000692 30-DEC-2015 08:39 AM