alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018301EN.01002801.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Europa Terra Nostra v Parliament

(Case T-13/17) (1)

((Law governing the institutions - European Parliament - Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation - Pre-financing amount fixed at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded - Obligation to provide a pre-financing bank guarantee - Financial Regulation - Rules for the application of the Financial Regulation - Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding - Proportionality - Misuse of powers))

(2018/C 301/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Europa Terra Nostra eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment in part of Decision FINS-2017-30 of the European Parliament of 12 December 2016 relating to the award of a grant to the applicant, in so far as that decision limits the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant and makes its payment conditional on the provision of a bank guarantee.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Europa Terra Nostra eV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Europa Terra Nostra eV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

---
# Official Journal L 331/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.331.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 331 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5610 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.331.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 331

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5610 December 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1253/2013 of 21 October 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1253/2013 of 21 October 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case 4:22-cr-00297-P Document 20 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 26
Case 4:22-cr-00297-P Document 20 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 27
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50398

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE LAWRENCE ANDREWS, also known

as Larry Andrews,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:02-CR-258-2

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, George Lawrence

Andrews raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Scroggins, 411 F.3d 572, 576-77 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that

the Due Process Clause does not bar the application of Justice

Breyer’s remedy opinion in United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct.

738 (2005), when resentencing defendants in light of Booker. The
No. 05-50398

-2-

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 288

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1993

Mr. NATCHER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Appropriations

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

1994, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 103–88, as amended

4 by Public Law 103–113 and Public Law 103–128, is fur5 ther amended by striking out ‘‘November 10, 1993’’ and

6 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘November 16, 1993’’.

Æ
Case 4:22-cr-00284-P Document 22 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 46
Case 4:22-cr-00284-P Document 22 Filed 10/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 47
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK et al.,

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

 v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States et al., 

 Defendants.

NOTICE OF RECENT AUTHORITY IN FURTHER OPPOSITION 

TO TACTICAL MACHINING AND JSD SUPPLY’S MOTIONS 

FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL

 Defendants respectfully notify the Court that on October 16, 2023, the Supreme Court issued 

an order in this case vacating this Court’s injunctions pending appeal entered on September 14, 2023 

(ECF No. 261). A copy of the Supreme Court’s order is attached hereto.

DATED: October 18, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

ALEXANDER K. HAAS

Director, Federal Programs Branch

LESLEY FARBY

Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch

/s/ Daniel Riess

DANIEL RIESS

TAISA M. GOODNATURE

JEREMY S.B. NEWMAN

Trial Attorneys

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

U.S. Department of Justice

1100 L Street, NW

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 266 Filed 10/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5281
2

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 353-3098

Email: Daniel.Riess@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On October 18, 2023, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of 

court for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the electronic case filing system 

of the court. I hereby certify that I have served all parties electronically or by another manner 

authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2).

/s/ Daniel Riess

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 266 Filed 10/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5282
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

*Agreement No.:*                     011587-008.                

*Title:*                     United States South Europe Conference.                

*Parties:*                     A.P. Moller-Maersk Sealand, P&O Nedlloyd Limited.                

*Synopsis:*                     The proposed amendment adds Greece, Cyprus, and Crete to the geographic scope of the agreement.                 

*Agreement No.:*                     201111.                

*Title:*                     Broward County-Seaescape Passenger Cruise Wharfage Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     Broward County, Seaescape Entertainment, Inc.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement is a daily passenger cruise wharfage agreement for certain facilities in Port Everglades. The agreement runs through September 30, 2010.                 

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: November 16, 2000. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-29822 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 124 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 124

  Designating the week of June 1 through June 7, 1993, as ``National 
                        Polio Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1993

  Mr. Doolittle introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of June 1 through June 7, 1993, as ``National 
                        Polio Awareness Week''.

Whereas there are an estimated 650,000 paralytic survivors in the United States 
        today;
Whereas knowledge about the late effects of polio is beginning to spread to all 
        polio survivors, the health care community, and the general public; and
Whereas the International Polio Network and over 300 local polio support 
        organizations have been instrumental in coordinating efforts to promote 
        research on and increase the awareness of the late effects of polio: 
        Now, therefore be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of June 1 
through June 7, 1993 be designated as ``National Polio Awareness 
Week''.

                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000948

13-DEC-2019

08:00 AM
United States District Court

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-00370-S

§

EDUARDO MEDINA SANCHEZ (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

EDUARDO MEDINA SANCHEZ (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th 

Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the

Superseding Information, filed November 2, 2023. After cautioning and examining EDUARDO MEDINA SANCHEZ 

(1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable 

and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential 

elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that EDUARDO MEDINA 

SANCHEZ (1) be adjudged guilty of Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute a Schedule II Controlled 

Substance, in violation of 21 USC § 846, 841(a) and (b)(1)(A), and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found 

guilty of the offense by the District Judge: 

☐ The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless: (1)(a) the Court finds there is 

a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

SIGNED 12th day of December, 2023. 

 _____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 REBECCA RUTHERFORD

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

Case 3:22-cr-00370-S Document 30 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 63
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69942-69943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

[Document Identifier: HCFA-10022]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration, HHS.
    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, is 
publishing the following summary of proposed collections for public 
comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this 
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, 
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility 
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of 
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) 
ways to enhance the quality,

[[Page 69943]]

utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) the 
use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology to minimize the information collection burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: New; Title of Information 
Collection: Medicare Beneficiary Customer Service Survey; Form No.: 
HCFA-10022 (OMB# 0938-XXXX); Use: The survey will attempt to obtain 
information regarding beneficiary expectations of customer service from 
Medicare; Frequency: Other: Once; Affected Public: Individuals or 
households; Number of Respondents: 1,500; Total Annual Responses: 
1,500; Total Annual Hours: 500.
    To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms 
for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above, access HCFA's 
Web Site address at http://www.hcfa.gov/regs/prdact95.htm, or E-mail 
your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and 
HCFA document identifier, to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b0b3a2b3e292c3429301b33383d3a753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="510130213423263e233a11393237307f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the Reports 
Clearance Office on (410) 786-1326. Written comments and 
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be mailed 
within 60 days of this notice directly to the HCFA Paperwork Clearance 
Officer designated at the following address: HCFA, Office of 
Information Services, Security and Standards Group, Division of HCFA 
Enterprise Standards, Attention: Julie Brown, Room N2-14-26, 7500 
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
John P. Burke, III,
Reports Clearance Officer, Security and Standards Group, Division of 
HCFA Enterprise Standards.
[FR Doc. 00-29786 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
October 19, 2015

Mr. Jared Plumb

3247 Palmtree Drive

Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404

Dear Mr. Plumb :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your letter posted to the public docket on July 21, 2015, filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3066 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministra tion (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notif ying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
United States District Court

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-00052-S

§

PATRICIA MALDONADO (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

PATRICIA MALDONADO (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 3 of the 3-Count 

Indictment, filed on February 2, 2022 After cautioning and examining PATRICIA MALDONADO (1) under oath 

concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary 

and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such

offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that PATRICIA MALDONADO (1) be adjudged 

guilty of Bank Robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found 

guilty of the offense by the District Judge: 

☐ The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless: (1)(a) the Court finds there is 

a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

SIGNED 15th day of August, 2023. 

 

 _____________________________________ 

 REBECCA RUTHERFORD 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

Case 3:22-cr-00052-S Document 35 Filed 08/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70