# Official Journal C 156/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.156.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 156 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 561 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.156.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 156

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 561 June 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2013/C 156/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 147, 25.5.2013 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2013/C 156/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 147, 25.5.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2013/C 156/02 | Joined Cases C-399/10 P and C-401/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2013 — Bouygues SA, Bouygues Télécom SA v European Commission and Others, European Commission, French Republic v Bouygues SA and Others (Appeals — State aid — Financial measures in favour of France Télécom — Shareholder loan proposal — Public declarations by a member of the French Government — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and not ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Concept of economic advantage — Concept of commitment of State resources) | 2 |
| 2013/C 156/03 | Case C-85/11: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2013 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 9 and 11 — National legislation permitting the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a group of persons who may be regarded as a single taxable person for VAT purposes) | 3 |
| 2013/C 156/04 | Case C-92/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — RWE Vertrieb AG v Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV (Directive 2003/55/EC — Internal market in natural gas — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 1(2) and 3 to 5 — Contracts between suppliers and consumers — General conditions — Unfair terms — Unilateral alteration by the supplier of the price of the service — Reference to mandatory legislation designed for another category of consumers — Applicability of Directive 93/13/EEC — Obligation of use of plain and intelligible language and transparency) | 3 |
| 2013/C 156/05 | Case C-254/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága — Hungary) — Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Rendőrkapitányság Záhony Határrendészeti Kirendeltsége v Oskar Shomodi (Area of freedom, security and justice — ‘Local border traffic’ at the external land borders of the Member States — Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 — Maximum duration of stay — Rules for calculation) | 4 |
| 2013/C 156/06 | Case C-258/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — Peter Sweetman and Others v An Bord Pleanála (Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6 — Conservation of natural habitats — Special areas of conservation — Assessment of the implications for a protected site of a plan or project — Criteria to be applied when assessing the likelihood that such a plan or project will adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned — Lough Corrib site — N6 Galway City Outer Bypass road scheme) | 4 |
| 2013/C 156/07 | Case C-260/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of David Edwards, Lilian Pallikaropoulos v Environment Agency, First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Environment — Aarhus Convention — Directive 85/337/EEC — Directive 2003/35/EC — Article 10a — Directive 96/61/EC — Article 15a — Access to justice in environmental matters — Meaning of ‘not prohibitively expensive’ judicial proceedings) | 5 |
| 2013/C 156/08 | Joined Cases C-335/11 and C-337/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsret, Denmark) — HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Jette Ring v Dansk almennyttigt Boligselskab (C-335/11) v HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Lone Skouboe Werge v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Pro Display A/S, in liquidation (C-337/11) (Social policy — United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities — Directive 2000/78/CE — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Articles 1, 2 and 5 — Difference in treatment on grounds of disability — Dismissal — Existence of a disability — Employee absent because of disability — Obligation to provide accommodation — Part-time work — Length of the period of notice) | 6 |
| 2013/C 156/09 | Case C-375/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Belgacom SA, Mobistar SA, KPN Group Belgium SA v Belgian State (Telecommunication services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Articles 3 and 12 to 14 — Rights to use radio frequencies — Fees for rights to use radio frequencies — One-off fees for grant and renewal of rights to use radio frequencies — Method of calculation — Alteration of existing rights) | 7 |
| 2013/C 156/10 | Case C-401/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Blanka Soukupová v Ministerstvo zemědělství (Agriculture — EAGGF — Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Support for rural development — Early retirement support — Transferor not less than 55 years old but not yet of normal retirement age at the time of transfer — Concept of ‘normal retirement age’ — National legislation determining a retirement age which varies depending on the sex of the applicant and, for women, on the number of children raised — General principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination) | 7 |
| 2013/C 156/11 | Case C-405/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — European Commission v Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o., Republic of Poland (Appeal — State aid — Restructuring of the Polish steel industry — Concept of State aid — Recovery of public debts — Classification as State aid of the failure to request the liquidation of the debtor undertaking — Private creditor test — Allocation of the burden of proof — Limits of judicial review) | 8 |
| 2013/C 156/12 | Case C-443/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — F.P. Jeltes, M.A. Peeters, J.G.J. Arnold v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Social security for migrant workers — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 71 — Wholly unemployed atypical frontier workers who have maintained personal and business links in the Member State of last employment — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 65 — Right to benefit in the Member State of residence — Refusal to pay by the Member State of last employment — Admissibility — Relevance of the judgment of the Court of 12 June 1986 in Case 1/85 Miethe — Transitional provisions — Article 87(8) — Concept of ‘unchanged situation’) | 8 |
| 2013/C 156/13 | Case C-535/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Novartis Pharma GmbH v Apozyt GmbH (Request for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Medicinal products for human use — Procedure for authorisation — Requirement for authorisation — Concept of medicinal products ‘developed’ by means of certain biotechnological processes, as referred to in point 1 of the Annex to that regulation — Repackaging process — Injectable solution distributed in single-use vials containing a larger quantity of the therapeutic solution than that actually used for the purposes of medical treatment — Part of the content of such vials drawn off, on prescription by a doctor, into syringes pre-filled with the prescribed dose, without any modification of the medicinal product) | 9 |
| 2013/C 156/14 | Case C-613/11: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid granted by the Italian Republic to the Sardinian shipping sector — Commission Decision 2008/92/EC declaring that aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery from the beneficiaries — Failure to implement within the prescribed period) | 10 |
| 2013/C 156/15 | Case C-636/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Karl Berger v Freistaat Bayern (Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 — Consumer protection — Food safety — Public information — Placing on the market of food unfit for human consumption, but not constituting a health risk) | 10 |
| 2013/C 156/16 | Case C-645/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Land Berlin v Ellen Mirjam Sapir, Michael J. Busse, Mirjam M. Birgansky, Gideon Rumney, Benjamin Ben-Zadok, Hedda Brown (Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Articles 1(1) and 6(1) — Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ — Undue payment made by a State entity — Claim for recovery of that payment in legal proceedings — Determination of the court having jurisdiction in the case where claims are connected — Close connection between the claims — Defendant domiciled in a non-member State) | 11 |
| 2013/C 156/17 | Case C-652/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2013 — Mindo Srl v European Commission (Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Payment of the fine by the jointly and severally liable debtor — Interest in bringing proceedings — Burden of proof) | 11 |
| 2013/C 156/18 | Case C-91/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v PFC Clinic AB (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 132(1)(b) and (c) — Hospital and medical care and closely related activities — Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — Services consisting in the performance of plastic surgery and cosmetic treatments — Interventions of a purely cosmetic nature based solely on the patient’s wishes) | 12 |
| 2013/C 156/19 | Case C-129/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt — Germany) — Magdeburger Mühlenwerke GmbH v Finanzamt Magdeburg (Regional aid scheme — Investment in the processing and marketing of agricultural products — Commission decision — Incompatibility with the internal market — Abolition of incompatible aid — Time at which aid is granted — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations) | 13 |
| 2013/C 156/20 | Case C-138/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna — Bulgaria) — Rusedespred OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 203 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Refund to the supplier of tax paid where the recipient under an exempt transaction is refused a right of deduction) | 13 |
| 2013/C 156/21 | Case C-158/12: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2013 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/1/EC — Article 5 — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Conditions governing the granting of permits for existing installations — Obligation to ensure that such installations operate in accordance with the requirements of that directive) | 14 |
| 2013/C 156/22 | Case C-197/12: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 148 — Exemption of certain transactions intended for vessels carrying passengers for reward or used for the purpose of commercial activities — Condition that the vessels must be used for navigation on the high seas) | 14 |
| 2013/C 156/23 | Case C-244/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Salzburger Flughafen GmbH v Umweltsenat (Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Directive 85/337/EEC — Articles 2(1) and 4(2) — Projects listed in Annex II — Extension works to the infrastructure of an airport — Examination on the basis of thresholds or criteria — Article 4(3) — Selection criteria — Annex III, point 2(g) — Densely populated areas) | 15 |
| 2013/C 156/24 | Case C-290/12: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli — Italy) — Oreste Della Rocca v Poste Italiane SpA (Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 2 — Scope of application of the Framework Agreement — Temporary employment business — Supply of temporary workers to a user undertaking — Successive fixed-term employment contracts) | 15 |
| 2013/C 156/25 | Case C-522/11: Order of the Court (Third Chamber Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Lecce — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Abdoul Khadre Mbaye (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — National legislation penalising illegal residence by criminal sanctions) | 16 |
| 2013/C 156/26 | Case C-153/12: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Sani Treyd EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane I upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 62, 63, 65, 73 and 80 — Establishment of a building right by natural persons who are neither taxable persons nor persons liable for payment in favour of a company in exchange for the construction of immovable property by that company for those natural persons — Barter contract — VAT on supplies relating to the construction of the immovable property — Chargeable event — When chargeable — Payment on account of the entire consideration — Payment on account — Basis of assessment in the event of consideration in the form of goods or services) | 16 |
| 2013/C 156/27 | Case C-24/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2013 — Dél-Zempléni Nektár Leader Nonprofit kft. v Vidékfejlesztési Miniszter | 17 |
| 2013/C 156/28 | Case C-26/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2013 — Kásler Árpád, Káslerné Rábai Hajnalka v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt. | 18 |
| 2013/C 156/29 | Case C-89/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli (Italy) lodged on 22 February 2013 — Luigi D’Aniello and Others v Poste Italiane SpA | 18 |
| 2013/C 156/30 | Case C-101/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 28 February 2013 — U v Stadt Karlsruhe | 19 |
| 2013/C 156/31 | Case C-113/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 8 March 2013 — ASL n. 5 ‘Spezzino’ and Others v San Lorenzo Società Cooperativa Sociale, Croce Verde Cogema Cooperativa Sociale Onlus | 20 |
| 2013/C 156/32 | Case C-124/13: Action brought on 14 March 2013 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union | 21 |
| 2013/C 156/33 | Case C-125/13: Action brought on 14 March 2013 — European Commission v Council of the European Union | 21 |
| 2013/C 156/34 | Case C-139/13: Action brought on 19 March 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium | 22 |
| 2013/C 156/35 | Case C-140/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 20 March 2013 — Annett Altmann and Others v Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht | 22 |
| 2013/C 156/36 | Case C-157/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 26 March 2013 — Nickel & Goeldner Spedition GmbH v Kintra UAB, in liquidation | 23 |
| 2013/C 156/37 | Case C-162/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 29 March 2013 — Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d. d. | 24 |
| 2013/C 156/38 | Case C-168/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil Constitutionnel (France) lodged on 4 April 2013 — Jeremy F. v Premier ministre | 24 |
| 2013/C 156/39 | Case C-175/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 28 March 2013 — MTÜ Liivimaa Lihaveis v Eesti-Läti programmi 2007-2013 Seirekomitee | 24 |
| 2013/C 156/40 | Case C-178/13: Action brought on 11 April 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland | 25 |
| 2013/C 156/41 | Case C-188/13: Action brought on 12 April 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia | 25 |
| 2013/C 156/42 | Case C-148/12: Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 2013 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany, supported by: Republic of France, Romania, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Slovak Republic | 25 |
| | General Court |
| 2013/C 156/43 | Case T-31/07: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Du Pont de Nemours (France) and Others v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance flusilazole — Inclusion of flusilazole in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Actions for annulment — Partial annulment — Non-severability — Inadmissibility — Non-contractual liability — Limiting the inclusion for a period of 18 months and for four crops — Precautionary principle — Principle of proportionality — Right to be heard — Equal treatment — Statement of reasons — Misuse of powers — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals) | 26 |
| 2013/C 156/44 | Case T-392/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — AEPI v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 26 |
| 2013/C 156/45 | Case T-398/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 27 |
| 2013/C 156/46 | Case T-401/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Säveltäjäin Tekijänoikeustoimisto Teosto v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 27 |
| 2013/C 156/47 | Case T-410/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — GEMA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 28 |
| 2013/C 156/48 | Case T-411/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Artisjus v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 28 |
| 2013/C 156/49 | Case T-413/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SOZA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 29 |
| 2013/C 156/50 | Case T-414/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Autortiesību un komunicēšanās konsultāciju aģentūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 29 |
| 2013/C 156/51 | Case T-415/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 30 |
| 2013/C 156/52 | Case T-416/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 30 |
| 2013/C 156/53 | Case T-417/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 31 |
| 2013/C 156/54 | Case T-418/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — OSA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 31 |
| 2013/C 156/55 | Case T-419/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — LATGA-A v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 32 |
| 2013/C 156/56 | Case T-420/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SAZAS v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 32 |
| 2013/C 156/57 | Case T-421/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Performing Right Society v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 33 |
| 2013/C 156/58 | Case T-422/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SACEM v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 33 |
| 2013/C 156/59 | Case T-425/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — KODA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 34 |
| 2013/C 156/60 | Case T-428/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — STEF v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 35 |
| 2013/C 156/61 | Case T-432/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — AKM v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to the public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practice excluding the possibility of granting multi-territorial, multi-repertoire licences — Evidence — Presumption of innocence) | 35 |
| 2013/C 156/62 | Case T-433/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SIAE v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 36 |
| 2013/C 156/63 | Case T-434/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Tono v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 36 |
| 2013/C 156/64 | Case T-442/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — CISAC v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence) | 37 |
| 2013/C 156/65 | Case T-451/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Stim v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Article 151(4) EC — Cultural diversity) | 37 |
| 2013/C 156/66 | Joined Cases T-99/09 and T-308/09: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Italy v Commission (ERDF — Campania Regional Operational Programme (ROP) 2000-2006 — Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Article 32(3)(f) — Decision not to make interim payments in connection with the ROP measure concerning waste management and disposal — Infringement procedure in respect of Italy) | 37 |
| 2013/C 156/67 | Case T-347/10: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Adelholzener Alpenquellen v OHIM (Shape of a bottle with an embossed pattern) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a bottle with an embossed pattern — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of declaration as to the scope of the protection — Article 37(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Infringements of the rights of the defence — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 38 |
| 2013/C 156/68 | Case T-383/10: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland v OHIM (CONTINENTAL) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark CONTINENTAL — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 38 |
| 2013/C 156/69 | Case T-51/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Aecops v Commission (ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons) | 38 |
| 2013/C 156/70 | Case T-52/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Aecops v Commission (ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons) | 39 |
| 2013/C 156/71 | Case T-53/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Aecops v Commission (ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons) | 39 |
| 2013/C 156/72 | Case T-109/11: Judgment of the General Court of 23 April 2013 — Apollo Tyres v OHIM — Endurance Technologies (ENDURANCE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENDURACE — Earlier Community figurative mark ENDURANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Partial refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion) | 40 |
| 2013/C 156/73 | Case T-404/11: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — TCMFG v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures against Iran intended to prevent nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment) | 40 |
| 2013/C 156/74 | Case T-454/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Luna v OHIM — Asteris (Al bustan) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark Al bustan — Earlier national figurative mark ALBUSTAN — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 40 |
| 2013/C 156/75 | Case T-506/11: Judgment of the General Court of 18 April 2013 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial name Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 41 |
| 2013/C 156/76 | Case T-507/11: Judgment of the General Court of 18 April 2013 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial name Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 41 |
| 2013/C 156/77 | Case T-537/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Hultafors Group AB v OHIM — Società Italiana Calzature (Snickers) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Snickers — Earlier national word mark KICKERS — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 42 |
| 2013/C 156/78 | Case T-66/10: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich v Commission (Agriculture — Sugar — Production levies — Partial annulment and declaration of nullity of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate) | 42 |
| 2013/C 156/79 | Case T-86/10: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — British Sugar v Commission (Agriculture — Sugar — Production levies — Annulment and declaration of invalidity in part of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after bringing of the action — No need to adjudicate) | 42 |
| 2013/C 156/80 | Case T-102/10: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — Südzucker and Others v Commission (Agriculture — Sugar — Production levies — Partial annulment and declaration of nullity of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate) | 43 |
| 2013/C 156/81 | Case T-467/12: Order of the General Court of 11 April 2013 — Tridium v OHIM — q-bus Mediatektur (SEDONA FRAMEWORK) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate) | 43 |
| 2013/C 156/82 | Case T-406/12 P: Appeal brought on 21 March 2013 by BG against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 July 2012 in Case F-54/11, BG v Ombudsman | 44 |
| 2013/C 156/83 | Case T-165/13: Action brought on 20 March 2013 — Talanton v Commission | 44 |
| 2013/C 156/84 | Case T-166/13: Action brought on 20 March 2013 — Ben Ali v Council | 45 |
| 2013/C 156/85 | Case T-176/13: Action brought on 22 March 2013 — DTL Corporación v OHIM — Vallejo Rosell (Generia) | 46 |
| 2013/C 156/86 | Case T-178/13: Action brought on 15 March 2013 — Jaczewski v Commission | 46 |
| 2013/C 156/87 | Case T-181/13: Action brought on 29 March 2013 — Sharif University of Technology v Council | 47 |
| 2013/C 156/88 | Case T-185/13: Action brought on 26 March 2013 — CWP v OHIM — Continental Reifen Deutschland (CONTINENTAL WIND PARTNERS) | 47 |
| 2013/C 156/89 | Case T-186/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Netherlands v Commission | 48 |
| 2013/C 156/90 | Case T-188/13: Action brought on 4 April 2013 — Murnauer Markenvertrieb v OHIM — Healing Herbs (NOTFALL) | 49 |
| 2013/C 156/91 | Case T-190/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Gemeente Leidschendam-Voorburg v Commission | 49 |
| 2013/C 156/92 | Case T-193/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Bouwfonds Ontwikkeling and Schouten & De Jong Projectontwikkeling v Commission | 50 |
| 2013/C 156/93 | Case T-197/13: Action brought on 1 April 2013 — M.E.M. v OHIM (MONACO) | 51 |
| 2013/C 156/94 | Case T-199/13: Action brought on 8 April 2013 — DTM Ricambi v OHIM — Star (STAR) | 51 |
| 2013/C 156/95 | Case T-203/13 P: Appeal brought on 8 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2013 in Case F-92/12, Marcuccio v Commission | 52 |
| 2013/C 156/96 | Case T-204/13 P: Appeal brought on 8 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2013 in Case F-95/12, Marcuccio v Commission | 52 |
| 2013/C 156/97 | Case T-205/13 P: Appeal brought on 8 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2013 in Case F-100/12, Marcuccio v Commission | 52 |
| 2013/C 156/98 | Case T-210/13: Action brought on 12 April 2013 — Versalis v Commission | 52 |
| 2013/C 156/99 | Case T-211/13: Action brought on 15 April 2013 — Eni v Commission | 53 |
| 2013/C 156/00 | Case T-216/13: Action brought on 9 April 2013 — Telefónica v Commission | 54 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2013/C 156/01 | Case F-21/13: Action brought on 8 March 2013 — ZZ v Commission | 55 |
| 2013/C 156/02 | Case F-23/13: Action brought on 20 March 2013 — ZZ and Others v Commission | 55 |
| 2013/C 156/03 | Case F-25/13: Action brought on 21 March 2013 — ZZ v Commission | 55 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2013/C 156/02

Joined Cases C-399/10 P and C-401/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 March 2013 — Bouygues SA, Bouygues Télécom SA v European Commission and Others, European Commission, French Republic v Bouygues SA and Others (Appeals — State aid — Financial measures in favour of France Télécom — Shareholder loan proposal — Public declarations by a member of the French Government — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and not ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Concept of economic advantage — Concept of commitment of State resources)

2

2013/C 156/03

Case C-85/11: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2013 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 9 and 11 — National legislation permitting the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a group of persons who may be regarded as a single taxable person for VAT purposes)

3

2013/C 156/04

Case C-92/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — RWE Vertrieb AG v Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV (Directive 2003/55/EC — Internal market in natural gas — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 1(2) and 3 to 5 — Contracts between suppliers and consumers — General conditions — Unfair terms — Unilateral alteration by the supplier of the price of the service — Reference to mandatory legislation designed for another category of consumers — Applicability of Directive 93/13/EEC — Obligation of use of plain and intelligible language and transparency)

3

2013/C 156/05

Case C-254/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága — Hungary) — Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Rendőrkapitányság Záhony Határrendészeti Kirendeltsége v Oskar Shomodi (Area of freedom, security and justice — ‘Local border traffic’ at the external land borders of the Member States — Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 — Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 — Maximum duration of stay — Rules for calculation)

4

2013/C 156/06

Case C-258/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — Peter Sweetman and Others v An Bord Pleanála (Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6 — Conservation of natural habitats — Special areas of conservation — Assessment of the implications for a protected site of a plan or project — Criteria to be applied when assessing the likelihood that such a plan or project will adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned — Lough Corrib site — N6 Galway City Outer Bypass road scheme)

4

2013/C 156/07

Case C-260/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of David Edwards, Lilian Pallikaropoulos v Environment Agency, First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Environment — Aarhus Convention — Directive 85/337/EEC — Directive 2003/35/EC — Article 10a — Directive 96/61/EC — Article 15a — Access to justice in environmental matters — Meaning of ‘not prohibitively expensive’ judicial proceedings)

5

2013/C 156/08

Joined Cases C-335/11 and C-337/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsret, Denmark) — HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Jette Ring v Dansk almennyttigt Boligselskab (C-335/11) v HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Lone Skouboe Werge v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Pro Display A/S, in liquidation (C-337/11) (Social policy — United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities — Directive 2000/78/CE — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Articles 1, 2 and 5 — Difference in treatment on grounds of disability — Dismissal — Existence of a disability — Employee absent because of disability — Obligation to provide accommodation — Part-time work — Length of the period of notice)

6

2013/C 156/09

Case C-375/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Belgacom SA, Mobistar SA, KPN Group Belgium SA v Belgian State (Telecommunication services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Articles 3 and 12 to 14 — Rights to use radio frequencies — Fees for rights to use radio frequencies — One-off fees for grant and renewal of rights to use radio frequencies — Method of calculation — Alteration of existing rights)

7

2013/C 156/10

Case C-401/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Blanka Soukupová v Ministerstvo zemědělství (Agriculture — EAGGF — Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Support for rural development — Early retirement support — Transferor not less than 55 years old but not yet of normal retirement age at the time of transfer — Concept of ‘normal retirement age’ — National legislation determining a retirement age which varies depending on the sex of the applicant and, for women, on the number of children raised — General principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination)

7

2013/C 156/11

Case C-405/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — European Commission v Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o., Republic of Poland (Appeal — State aid — Restructuring of the Polish steel industry — Concept of State aid — Recovery of public debts — Classification as State aid of the failure to request the liquidation of the debtor undertaking — Private creditor test — Allocation of the burden of proof — Limits of judicial review)

8

2013/C 156/12

Case C-443/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — F.P. Jeltes, M.A. Peeters, J.G.J. Arnold v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Social security for migrant workers — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 71 — Wholly unemployed atypical frontier workers who have maintained personal and business links in the Member State of last employment — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 65 — Right to benefit in the Member State of residence — Refusal to pay by the Member State of last employment — Admissibility — Relevance of the judgment of the Court of 12 June 1986 in Case 1/85 Miethe — Transitional provisions — Article 87(8) — Concept of ‘unchanged situation’)

8

2013/C 156/13

Case C-535/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Novartis Pharma GmbH v Apozyt GmbH (Request for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Medicinal products for human use — Procedure for authorisation — Requirement for authorisation — Concept of medicinal products ‘developed’ by means of certain biotechnological processes, as referred to in point 1 of the Annex to that regulation — Repackaging process — Injectable solution distributed in single-use vials containing a larger quantity of the therapeutic solution than that actually used for the purposes of medical treatment — Part of the content of such vials drawn off, on prescription by a doctor, into syringes pre-filled with the prescribed dose, without any modification of the medicinal product)

9

2013/C 156/14

Case C-613/11: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid granted by the Italian Republic to the Sardinian shipping sector — Commission Decision 2008/92/EC declaring that aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery from the beneficiaries — Failure to implement within the prescribed period)

10

2013/C 156/15

Case C-636/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Karl Berger v Freistaat Bayern (Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 — Consumer protection — Food safety — Public information — Placing on the market of food unfit for human consumption, but not constituting a health risk)

10

2013/C 156/16

Case C-645/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Land Berlin v Ellen Mirjam Sapir, Michael J. Busse, Mirjam M. Birgansky, Gideon Rumney, Benjamin Ben-Zadok, Hedda Brown (Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Articles 1(1) and 6(1) — Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ — Undue payment made by a State entity — Claim for recovery of that payment in legal proceedings — Determination of the court having jurisdiction in the case where claims are connected — Close connection between the claims — Defendant domiciled in a non-member State)

11

2013/C 156/17

Case C-652/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2013 — Mindo Srl v European Commission (Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Payment of the fine by the jointly and severally liable debtor — Interest in bringing proceedings — Burden of proof)

11

2013/C 156/18

Case C-91/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v PFC Clinic AB (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 132(1)(b) and (c) — Hospital and medical care and closely related activities — Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — Services consisting in the performance of plastic surgery and cosmetic treatments — Interventions of a purely cosmetic nature based solely on the patient’s wishes)

12

2013/C 156/19

Case C-129/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt — Germany) — Magdeburger Mühlenwerke GmbH v Finanzamt Magdeburg (Regional aid scheme — Investment in the processing and marketing of agricultural products — Commission decision — Incompatibility with the internal market — Abolition of incompatible aid — Time at which aid is granted — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)

13

2013/C 156/20

Case C-138/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna — Bulgaria) — Rusedespred OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 203 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Refund to the supplier of tax paid where the recipient under an exempt transaction is refused a right of deduction)

13

2013/C 156/21

Case C-158/12: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2013 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/1/EC — Article 5 — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Conditions governing the granting of permits for existing installations — Obligation to ensure that such installations operate in accordance with the requirements of that directive)

14

2013/C 156/22

Case C-197/12: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 148 — Exemption of certain transactions intended for vessels carrying passengers for reward or used for the purpose of commercial activities — Condition that the vessels must be used for navigation on the high seas)

14

2013/C 156/23

Case C-244/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Salzburger Flughafen GmbH v Umweltsenat (Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Directive 85/337/EEC — Articles 2(1) and 4(2) — Projects listed in Annex II — Extension works to the infrastructure of an airport — Examination on the basis of thresholds or criteria — Article 4(3) — Selection criteria — Annex III, point 2(g) — Densely populated areas)

15

2013/C 156/24

Case C-290/12: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli — Italy) — Oreste Della Rocca v Poste Italiane SpA (Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 2 — Scope of application of the Framework Agreement — Temporary employment business — Supply of temporary workers to a user undertaking — Successive fixed-term employment contracts)

15

2013/C 156/25

Case C-522/11: Order of the Court (Third Chamber Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Lecce — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Abdoul Khadre Mbaye (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — National legislation penalising illegal residence by criminal sanctions)

16

2013/C 156/26

Case C-153/12: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Sani Treyd EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane I upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 62, 63, 65, 73 and 80 — Establishment of a building right by natural persons who are neither taxable persons nor persons liable for payment in favour of a company in exchange for the construction of immovable property by that company for those natural persons — Barter contract — VAT on supplies relating to the construction of the immovable property — Chargeable event — When chargeable — Payment on account of the entire consideration — Payment on account — Basis of assessment in the event of consideration in the form of goods or services)

16

2013/C 156/27

Case C-24/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2013 — Dél-Zempléni Nektár Leader Nonprofit kft. v Vidékfejlesztési Miniszter

17

2013/C 156/28

Case C-26/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2013 — Kásler Árpád, Káslerné Rábai Hajnalka v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt.

18

2013/C 156/29

Case C-89/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli (Italy) lodged on 22 February 2013 — Luigi D’Aniello and Others v Poste Italiane SpA

18

2013/C 156/30

Case C-101/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 28 February 2013 — U v Stadt Karlsruhe

19

2013/C 156/31

Case C-113/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 8 March 2013 — ASL n. 5 ‘Spezzino’ and Others v San Lorenzo Società Cooperativa Sociale, Croce Verde Cogema Cooperativa Sociale Onlus

20

2013/C 156/32

Case C-124/13: Action brought on 14 March 2013 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

21

2013/C 156/33

Case C-125/13: Action brought on 14 March 2013 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

21

2013/C 156/34

Case C-139/13: Action brought on 19 March 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

22

2013/C 156/35

Case C-140/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 20 March 2013 — Annett Altmann and Others v Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

22

2013/C 156/36

Case C-157/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 26 March 2013 — Nickel & Goeldner Spedition GmbH v Kintra UAB, in liquidation

23

2013/C 156/37

Case C-162/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 29 March 2013 — Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d. d.

24

2013/C 156/38

Case C-168/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil Constitutionnel (France) lodged on 4 April 2013 — Jeremy F. v Premier ministre

24

2013/C 156/39

Case C-175/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 28 March 2013 — MTÜ Liivimaa Lihaveis v Eesti-Läti programmi 2007-2013 Seirekomitee

24

2013/C 156/40

Case C-178/13: Action brought on 11 April 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

25

2013/C 156/41

Case C-188/13: Action brought on 12 April 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

25

2013/C 156/42

Case C-148/12: Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 2013 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany, supported by: Republic of France, Romania, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Slovak Republic

25

General Court

2013/C 156/43

Case T-31/07: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Du Pont de Nemours (France) and Others v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance flusilazole — Inclusion of flusilazole in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Actions for annulment — Partial annulment — Non-severability — Inadmissibility — Non-contractual liability — Limiting the inclusion for a period of 18 months and for four crops — Precautionary principle — Principle of proportionality — Right to be heard — Equal treatment — Statement of reasons — Misuse of powers — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

26

2013/C 156/44

Case T-392/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — AEPI v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

26

2013/C 156/45

Case T-398/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

27

2013/C 156/46

Case T-401/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Säveltäjäin Tekijänoikeustoimisto Teosto v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

27

2013/C 156/47

Case T-410/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — GEMA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

28

2013/C 156/48

Case T-411/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Artisjus v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

28

2013/C 156/49

Case T-413/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SOZA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

29

2013/C 156/50

Case T-414/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Autortiesību un komunicēšanās konsultāciju aģentūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

29

2013/C 156/51

Case T-415/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Irish Music Rights Organisation v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

30

2013/C 156/52

Case T-416/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Eesti Autorite Ühing v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

30

2013/C 156/53

Case T-417/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

31

2013/C 156/54

Case T-418/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — OSA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

31

2013/C 156/55

Case T-419/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — LATGA-A v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

32

2013/C 156/56

Case T-420/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SAZAS v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

32

2013/C 156/57

Case T-421/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Performing Right Society v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

33

2013/C 156/58

Case T-422/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SACEM v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

33

2013/C 156/59

Case T-425/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — KODA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

34

2013/C 156/60

Case T-428/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — STEF v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

35

2013/C 156/61

Case T-432/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — AKM v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to the public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practice excluding the possibility of granting multi-territorial, multi-repertoire licences — Evidence — Presumption of innocence)

35

2013/C 156/62

Case T-433/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SIAE v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

36

2013/C 156/63

Case T-434/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Tono v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

36

2013/C 156/64

Case T-442/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — CISAC v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Proof — Presumption of innocence)

37

2013/C 156/65

Case T-451/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Stim v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Sharing of the geographic market — Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies — Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences — Article 151(4) EC — Cultural diversity)

37

2013/C 156/66

Joined Cases T-99/09 and T-308/09: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Italy v Commission (ERDF — Campania Regional Operational Programme (ROP) 2000-2006 — Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Article 32(3)(f) — Decision not to make interim payments in connection with the ROP measure concerning waste management and disposal — Infringement procedure in respect of Italy)

37

2013/C 156/67

Case T-347/10: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Adelholzener Alpenquellen v OHIM (Shape of a bottle with an embossed pattern) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a bottle with an embossed pattern — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of declaration as to the scope of the protection — Article 37(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Infringements of the rights of the defence — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

38

2013/C 156/68

Case T-383/10: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland v OHIM (CONTINENTAL) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark CONTINENTAL — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

38

2013/C 156/69

Case T-51/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Aecops v Commission (ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons)

38

2013/C 156/70

Case T-52/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Aecops v Commission (ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons)

39

2013/C 156/71

Case T-53/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Aecops v Commission (ESF — Training operations — Reduction in financial assistance initially granted — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Time-bar — Legal certainty — Rights of the defence — Reasonable period — Duty to state reasons)

39

2013/C 156/72

Case T-109/11: Judgment of the General Court of 23 April 2013 — Apollo Tyres v OHIM — Endurance Technologies (ENDURANCE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENDURACE — Earlier Community figurative mark ENDURANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Partial refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion)

40

2013/C 156/73

Case T-404/11: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — TCMFG v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures against Iran intended to prevent nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)

40

2013/C 156/74

Case T-454/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Luna v OHIM — Asteris (Al bustan) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark Al bustan — Earlier national figurative mark ALBUSTAN — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

40

2013/C 156/75

Case T-506/11: Judgment of the General Court of 18 April 2013 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial name Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

41

2013/C 156/76

Case T-507/11: Judgment of the General Court of 18 April 2013 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial name Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

41

2013/C 156/77

Case T-537/11: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Hultafors Group AB v OHIM — Società Italiana Calzature (Snickers) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Snickers — Earlier national word mark KICKERS — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

42

2013/C 156/78

Case T-66/10: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich v Commission (Agriculture — Sugar — Production levies — Partial annulment and declaration of nullity of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)

42

2013/C 156/79

Case T-86/10: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — British Sugar v Commission (Agriculture — Sugar — Production levies — Annulment and declaration of invalidity in part of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after bringing of the action — No need to adjudicate)

42

2013/C 156/80

Case T-102/10: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — Südzucker and Others v Commission (Agriculture — Sugar — Production levies — Partial annulment and declaration of nullity of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)

43

2013/C 156/81

Case T-467/12: Order of the General Court of 11 April 2013 — Tridium v OHIM — q-bus Mediatektur (SEDONA FRAMEWORK) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

43

2013/C 156/82

Case T-406/12 P: Appeal brought on 21 March 2013 by BG against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 17 July 2012 in Case F-54/11, BG v Ombudsman

44

2013/C 156/83

Case T-165/13: Action brought on 20 March 2013 — Talanton v Commission

44

2013/C 156/84

Case T-166/13: Action brought on 20 March 2013 — Ben Ali v Council

45

2013/C 156/85

Case T-176/13: Action brought on 22 March 2013 — DTL Corporación v OHIM — Vallejo Rosell (Generia)

46

2013/C 156/86

Case T-178/13: Action brought on 15 March 2013 — Jaczewski v Commission

46

2013/C 156/87

Case T-181/13: Action brought on 29 March 2013 — Sharif University of Technology v Council

47

2013/C 156/88

Case T-185/13: Action brought on 26 March 2013 — CWP v OHIM — Continental Reifen Deutschland (CONTINENTAL WIND PARTNERS)

47

2013/C 156/89

Case T-186/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Netherlands v Commission

48

2013/C 156/90

Case T-188/13: Action brought on 4 April 2013 — Murnauer Markenvertrieb v OHIM — Healing Herbs (NOTFALL)

49

2013/C 156/91

Case T-190/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Gemeente Leidschendam-Voorburg v Commission

49

2013/C 156/92

Case T-193/13: Action brought on 2 April 2013 — Bouwfonds Ontwikkeling and Schouten & De Jong Projectontwikkeling v Commission

50

2013/C 156/93

Case T-197/13: Action brought on 1 April 2013 — M.E.M. v OHIM (MONACO)

51

2013/C 156/94

Case T-199/13: Action brought on 8 April 2013 — DTM Ricambi v OHIM — Star (STAR)

51

2013/C 156/95

Case T-203/13 P: Appeal brought on 8 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2013 in Case F-92/12, Marcuccio v Commission

52

2013/C 156/96

Case T-204/13 P: Appeal brought on 8 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2013 in Case F-95/12, Marcuccio v Commission

52

2013/C 156/97

Case T-205/13 P: Appeal brought on 8 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2013 in Case F-100/12, Marcuccio v Commission

52

2013/C 156/98

Case T-210/13: Action brought on 12 April 2013 — Versalis v Commission

52

2013/C 156/99

Case T-211/13: Action brought on 15 April 2013 — Eni v Commission

53

2013/C 156/00

Case T-216/13: Action brought on 9 April 2013 — Telefónica v Commission

54

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2013/C 156/01

Case F-21/13: Action brought on 8 March 2013 — ZZ v Commission

55

2013/C 156/02

Case F-23/13: Action brought on 20 March 2013 — ZZ and Others v Commission

55

2013/C 156/03

Case F-25/13: Action brought on 21 March 2013 — ZZ v Commission

55

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN