alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

FRANCIS LEE BULLOCK, §

TDCJ No. 2243585, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-870-B

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions,

and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions,

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Further, considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 proceedings, and 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by

reference the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation filed in this case in

support of its finding that the Petitioner has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this

Court’s “assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists

would find “it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right” and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel,

-1-

Case 3:22-cv-00870-B-BN Document 22 Filed 05/15/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1172
529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).1

But, if Petitioner does file a notice of appeal, he must either pay the appellate filing fee of

$505.00 or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 15, 2023.

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

 Rule 11 of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 Cases, as amended effective on December 1, 2009,

reads as follows:

(a) Certificate of Appealability. The district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability

when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. Before entering the final order, the court may direct the

parties to submit arguments on whether a certificate should issue. If the court issues a certificate, the court

must state the specific issue or issues that satisfy the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). If the court

denies a certificate, the parties may not appeal the denial but may seek a certificate from the court of appeals

under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22. A motion to reconsider a denial does not extend the time to

appeal.

(b) Time to Appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order

entered under these rules. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court issues a certificate

of appealability.

-2-

Case 3:22-cv-00870-B-BN Document 22 Filed 05/15/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1173
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

Certificate of the 

Chief FINANCIAL Officer of 

FNBH BANCORP, INC.

 

                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

 

                I, Mark J. Huber, Chief Financial Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

 

(1)  The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

 

                (2)  The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

 

 

The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elmore Harris, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in decision at Erie County Court, McCarthy, J. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J. —robbery, second degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00326-L

§

DESHAWN MICHAEL KNIGHTEN (13) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

DESHAWN MICHAEL KNIGHTEN is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, 

namely, Possession With Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting. Sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 17th day of November, 2023.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 356 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1057
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

      ( print page 69940)    
Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, November 21, 2000, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to sections 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of Title 5, United States Code, to consider supervisory, resolution, corporate, and personnel matters.

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

Dated: November 16, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29826  Filed 11-16-00; 4:58 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
Exhibit 32 - Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal
             Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
             Act of 2002.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of Taitron Components
Incorporated.

I, Stewart Wang, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of registrant, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

      (i)   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the registrant.

Dated November 14, 2006.                     By: /s/ Stewart Wang
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Stewart Wang
                                                 Principal Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30416 Summary Calendar

WILBURN L. DOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-1545

__________________________________________

March 9, 1999 Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Wilburn L. Dove appeals from the judgment affirming the denial of his application for Social Security disabilit

y insurance benefits. Dove argues that the administrative determination that he can perform the full range of light work is not supported by substantial evidence. Dove did not raise his contention before the Appeals Council; therefore, he did not exhaust

administrative remedies as to this issue. We find no reason to waive the exhaustion requirement in

Dove’s case. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over Dove’s appeal. P aul v. Shalala
, 29 F.3d 208,

210 (5th Cir. 1994); see Giannakos v. M/V BRAVO TRADER
, 762 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1985) (court must observe lack of subject-matter jurisdiction sua sponte).2

APPEAL DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

REIDIE JACKSON, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:22-CV-0145-M-BR

§

RAY CRUZ, et al., §

§

 Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

After making an independent review of the case, and the January 20, 2023, Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Court concludes the Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Conclusions are correct. The recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is 

accepted and the Complaint is dismissed as set forth in the recommendation.

SO ORDERED 14th day of February, 2023.

Case 2:22-cv-00145-M-BR Document 6 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R.L. Smith, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/ Gregory
 R. L. Smith
| | Gregory R.
 L. Smith    
| | Chief
 Financial Officer
| | May 13, 2009            



---
Exhibit 35

SERVICERS ANNUAL CERTIFICATION

CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC BANK

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.10 OF THE SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT

This Servicers Annual Certification is delivered pursuant to a sale and servicing agreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the
Sale and Servicing Agreement) by and among, California Republic Auto Receivables Trust 2015-2, California Republic Funding, LLC, California Republic Bank, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator, Calculation Agent and Custodian (in
such capacity, the Servicer), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the Indenture Trustee). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned thereto in
Appendix A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

The undersigned, a Responsible Officer of the Servicer, hereby certifies that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer and of the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the
period from June 5, 2015 to and including December 31, 2015 (the Review Period) was conducted under my supervision.

2. Based on my knowledge and such review, except as otherwise disclosed pursuant to paragraph 3 below, the Servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the applicable Review Period and there is no significant deficiency known by me with respect to the applicable Review Period which has not been disclosed herein.

3. Based on such review, to my knowledge, there has been no significant deficiency during the Review Period in the performance of the
Servicers obligations under the provisions of the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

[SIGNATURE APPEARS ON NEXT PAGE]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, in my capacity as specified below, has caused this
certificate to be executed as of the date indicated below.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                                             
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Mark K. Olson
Mark K. Olson EVP, Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 250/27 S

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 250 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4827 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 250

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4827 September 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2005 of 26 September 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1566/2005 of 26 September 2005 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Jordan | 3 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2005 of 26 September 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1566/2005 of 26 September 2005 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Jordan

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,593,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,572,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,000
<INVENTORY>                                    208,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,489,000
<PP&E>                                       1,541,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,051,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,720,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          883,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,337,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,720,000
<SALES>                                      1,533,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,533,000
<CGS>                                          534,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  534,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,020,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit












AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the 2nd day of September, 2015 as an amendment to the original Employment Agreement dated September 10, 2014 between V. Scott Vanis ("Employee") and Minerco Resources, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, it’s affiliates, predecessors and subsidiaries (the "Company”). 
WHEREAS, Employee and the Company desire to enter into this Amendment Agreement setting forth the terms and conditions for the employment relationship of Employee with the Company during the Employment Term (as defined below).  This agreement shall amend the Employment Agreement dated September 10, 2014 between Employee and Company.  
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties to this Amendment Agreement hereby agree to Amend the sections as follows: 
2.2     Stock. The Company shall grant to Five Hundred Thousand (500,000) shares of its Class B Preferred Stock, which were subsequently exchanged on January 7, 2015 for Two Hundred Fifty Thousand (250,000) shares of its Class C Preferred Stock, upon the effective date of this original Employment Agreement dated September 10, 2014.  The stock shall be fully paid, non-assessable and shall contain other customary rights and privileges, including piggy back registration rights.  All stock shall vest as of July 31, 2017.  
6.5.     Termination in Case of Death. In case of Employee's death, any and all unvested stock or options granted to Employee under Section 2.2 of this Agreement shall vest in favor of Employee's estate as provided for in this Section(s) 6.51, 6.5.2, 6.5.3, and 6.5.4 herein. Company shall also continue any health benefits for family for one year.  All stock shall vest as of July 31, 2017.  




The Company:
Minerco Resources, Inc.
800 Bering Drive, Suite 201
Houston, TX 77057


Employee: 
V. Scott Vanis
800 Bering Drive, Suite 201
Houston, TX 77057


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment Agreement as of the date first above written. 
Minerco Resources, Inc., a Nevada Corporation


By:___/s/ V. Scott Vanis____________
     V. Scott Vanis, President, Director 











Employee




By:___/s/ V. Scott Vanis____________
     V. Scott Vanis, an Individual
# C_2021148EN.01001501.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2021 — Barata v Parliament

(Case T-723/18) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Certification procedure - Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme - Article 45a of the Staff Regulations - Action for annulment - Communication by registered letter - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations - Registered letter not collected by the person to whom it was addressed - Starting point of the period prescribed for instituting proceedings - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Principle of sound administration - Proportionality - Rules on the use of languages)

(2021/C 148/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: João Miguel Barata (Evere, Belgium) (represented by: G. Pandey, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of 23 July 2018, the act of 7 December 2017, the act of 21 December 2017, the letter of 1 March 2018, the letter of 22 March 2018 concerning the applicant’s candidacy in the 2017 certification procedure and the notice of internal competition of 22 September 2017.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders João Miguel Barata to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders João Miguel Barata to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---