alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PETERSON METELLUS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-1041

[October 25, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Marni A. Bryson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502013CF03475AMB.

Jerrard B. Cutrone, Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Mark J. Hamel and 

Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Martin v. State, 797 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (Issues 

I, II, IV); Jackson v. State, 698 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Issue III).

WARNER, LEVINE, JJ., and BUCHANAN, LAURIE E., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Kenyon House

1 The Western-Centre

WestemRoad

Bracknell

RG121RW

dH.! "1',111 MUD "1" --' "L. P I: 4b

U.S. Department of Transportation,

Dockets

Attn: Dockets OST 98-3304

400 Seventh St. S.W.

PL 401

Washington DC, 20590

USA

26th July 2013

Dear Sir,

Further to my letter of 29th January 2013, Kenyon is pleased to be able to inform you

that we will provide third party recovery support to Insel Air International in the

event of mass fatality incident under the U.S. Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Act

of 1996.

If you have any questions relating to this letter, please contact me at the above

address.

Cc. Ruben Welvaart - Insel Air International

, ,'J

," -

Kenyon UK a branch of Kenyon International Emergency Services Inc"

15180 Grand Point Drive, Houston, Texas 77090. Company Reg, No. FC24150. VAT Reg, No. 793 0410 38

, !
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Pipeline (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Pipeline (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           | 345,848   | 405,724   | 421,188   | 365,789   | 413,893   | 428,987   | 535,700   | 643,344   | 732,913  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 831,046   | 803,511   | 849,251   | 907,152   | 942,100   | NA        | 923,008   | NA        | 941,907   | 1,010,002
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,181,176 | 1,103,537 | 1,045,221 | 1,040,762 | 1,107,262 | 1,117,618 | 1,141,390 | 1,079,946 | 1,076,711 | 966,479  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 974,792   | 1,031,845 | 1,101,695 | 992,655   | 1,035,979 | 1,043,221 | 1,152,892 | 1,198,770 | 1,203,479 | 1,259,112
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,176,044 | 1,216,410 | 1,289,006 | 1,341,910 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
#### THRIFT v. STATE.

No. 22657.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 8, 1943.

Geo. W. Harwood, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to murder, and given a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record.

The facts relied upon by the State show that the injured party, together with some friends and relatives, both men and women, had been frequenting some cafes in the city of Dallas in the early morning hours, drinking and eating. Eventually they came to Spruce’s cafe, and there they saw a horse hitched to a wagon. The injured party, a soldier, remarked that this horse had only one eye. Appellant, who was standing near, answered that the horse was blind in one eye and couldn’t see out of the other. Finally, it is claimed by the State, appellant came up to the car where the complaining witness was located and requested a dime in order to complete the amount of money necessary to purchase some beer. This request was refused. Appellant then went into the tavern, and later returned with some companions, and a fight ensued with the complaining witness, as well as a lady relative with him, and they were rather roughly handled. The complaining witness, Jimmie O’Leary, was knocked down, and appellant then jumped on him, and, locking his legs around O’Leary, cut O’Leary’s throat, severing the external jugular vein, saying: “I am going to cut your Gd-head off.” O’Leary finally got away from appellant and ran to his car, whereupon appellant cut him in the back, and again he was cut by appellant when he jumped on the car as it left the scene. O’Leary testified the knife used by appellant was a Deep Elm Special, with a blade about four inches long.

Appellant’s theory of this difficulty differed materially in many respects from the facts produced by the State, and had-the jury believed the same, a different result of the trial could have been reached. This conflict in testimony came within the province of the jury, and they have settled the same contrary to appellant’s contention, and we will not disturb their verdict thereon.

We think the testimony sufficient to establish an assault to murder without malice, as is shown by the verdict, and the judgment is therefore affirmed. '
# AGENCY:

 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, DOT. 

# ACTION:

 Notice of conference. 

# SUMMARY:

 The U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Defense are conducting an open meeting for all users of U.S. Government-provided radionavigation systems. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain user perspectives on Federal policies and plans for these systems. Systems to be covered include the Global Positioning System (GPS); differential GPS and other GPS augmentations; Loran-C; VOR/DME; TACAN; Radiobeacons; and ILS/MLS. Input on all applications of these systems is welcome, including navigation, positioning, surveying and mapping, timing, network synchronization, and resource management. All users, equipment manufacturers, service providers, Federal, State, and local government personnel, and any others with an interest in these systems are encouraged to attend. There is no registration fee to attend this conference. 

The meeting will be held in conjunction with the Civil GPS Service Interface Committee meeting on March 28, 29, and 30, 2000, at the Fair Oaks Holiday Inn in Fairfax, Virginia. Federal Government radionavigation policies and plans will be presented on March 28 followed by reports on international and timing GPS activities on March 29, and State and Locality GPS activities on the morning of March 30. The afternoon of March 30, beginning at 1 p.m. is reserved exclusively for questions and answers regarding current and future U.S. Government policies and plans in the Federal Radionavigation Plan. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For Further Information Contact: To obtain an information/registration package, please contact Carol-Ann Courtney at the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center; Conference Office (DTS-930); 55 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142. Tel: (617) 494-2686. Fax: (617) 494-2569. 

Issued in Washington, DC on February 3, 2000. 

Joseph F. Canny, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Navigation Systems Policy. 

[FR Doc. 00-2951 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 271 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 271

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 4 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the month of November in each of calendar years 1993 and 
          1994 as ``National American Indian Heritage Month''.

Whereas American Indians were the original inhabitants of the lands that now 
        constitute the United States of America;
Whereas American Indian Governments developed the fundamental principles of 
        freedom of speech and separation of powers in government, and these 
        principles form the foundation of the United States Government today;
Whereas American Indian societies have exhibited a respect for the finiteness of 
        natural resources through deep respect for the earth, and these values 
        continue to be widely held today;
Whereas American Indian people have served with valor in all wars from 
        Revolutionary War to the conflict in the Persian Gulf, often in a 
        percentage well above their percentage in the population of the Nation 
        as a whole;
Whereas American Indians have made distinct and important contributions to 
        America and the rest of the world in many fields, including agriculture, 
        medicine, music, language, and art;
Whereas American Indians deserve to be recognized for their individual 
        contributions to American society as artists, sculptors, musicians, 
        authors, poets, artisans, scientists, and scholars;
Whereas designating the month of November in each of calendar years 1993 and 
        1994 to recognize the heritage and the contributions to American society 
        of American Indians will encourage self-esteem, pride, and self-
        awareness in American Indians of all ages; and
Whereas November is traditionally the month when American Indians have harvested 
        their crops and is generally a time of celebration and giving thanks: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That--
            (1) the month of November in each of calendar years 1993 
        and 1994 is designated as ``National American Indian Heritage 
        Month''; and
            (2) the President is authorized and requested to issue a 
        proclamation in each of those years calling on the people of 
        the United States to observe such month with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2005082EN.01001902.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/19

---

Action brought on 10 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Portuguese Republic

(Case C-61/05)

(2005/C 82/40)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Portuguese Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 10 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by P.Andrade and W.Wils, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Portuguese Republic, by creating in Portuguese law a rental right in favour of producers of videograms, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 92/100/EEC (1) of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property, and in particular under Article 2(1) thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Portuguese Republic, by creating in Portuguese law a rental right in favour of producers of videograms, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 92/100/EEC (1) of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property, and in particular under Article 2(1) thereof;

1

| — | declare that the Portuguese Republic, by creating in Portuguese law some doubt as to who is responsible for paying the remuneration owed to artists on termination of the rental right, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 92/100/EEC, in particular under Article 4 in conjunction with Article 2(5) and (7) thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Portuguese Republic, by creating in Portuguese law some doubt as to who is responsible for paying the remuneration owed to artists on termination of the rental right, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 92/100/EEC, in particular under Article 4 in conjunction with Article 2(5) and (7) thereof;

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that by failing to an grant exclusive rental right to the producer of the first fixation of a film, the Portuguese State is in breach of Directive 92/100 since it transposed the provisions of Article 2(1) of the directive incorrectly.

Moreover, the use of the term ‘producer’ in the Portuguese legislation creates confusion as to who must pay the artists the remuneration to which they are entitled, constituting an incorrect transposition of the directive, in particular of Article 2(5) and (7) in conjunction with Article 4 thereof.

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 346, p. 61.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-374-000]


Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison 
Company, Pennsylvania Electric Company; Notice of Filing

November 13, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 7, 2000, Jersey Central Power & Light 
Company, Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company 
(d/b/a GPU Energy), tendered for filing an executed Service Agreement 
between GPU Energy and Koch Energy Trading, Inc. (KOCH), dated November 
6, 2000. This Service Agreement specifies that KOCH has agreed to the 
rates, terms and conditions of GPU Energy's Market-Based Sales Tariff 
(Sales Tariff) designated as FERC Electric Rate Schedule, Second 
Revised Volume No. 5. The Sales Tariff allows GPU Energy and KOCH to 
enter into separately scheduled transactions under which GPU Energy 
will make available for sale, surplus capacity and/or energy.
    GPU Energy requests a waiver of the Commission's notice 
requirements for good cause shown and an effective date of November 6, 
2000, for the Service Agreement.
    GPU Energy has served copies of the filing on regulatory agencies 
in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before November 28, 2000. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may 
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(9a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29737 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 258

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibiting

retroactive increases in taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1993

Mr. HERGER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States prohibiting retroactive increases in taxes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

•HJ 258 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica2 tion:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. In the case of any provision of law

5 which modifies the tax laws of the United States and

6 which results in increased revenues to the United States—

7 ‘‘(1) no such modification of any income tax

8 shall apply to any taxable year beginning before the

9 date of the enactment of such modification, and

10 ‘‘(2) no such modification of any excise tax

11 shall apply to any event occurring before the date of

12 the enactment of such modification.

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. Section 1 of this article shall not apply

14 to any law which the President of the United States de15 clares at the time of signing is enacted pursuant to a

16 national emergency.’’

Æ
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 273

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to Federal budget

procedures.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1993

Mr. VOLKMER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to

Federal budget procedures.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States
2

HJ 273 IH

1 within ten years after its submission to the States for

2 ratification.

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Prior to each fiscal year, the Congress

5 shall adopt a statement of receipts and outlays for that

6 year in which total outlays are not greater than total re7 ceipts. The Congress may amend such statement provided

8 revised outlays are no greater than revised receipts. When9 ever three-fifths of the whole number of both Houses shall

10 deem it necessary, Congress in such statement may pro11 vide for a specific excess of outlays over receipts by a vote

12 directed solely to that subject. The Congress and the

13 President shall, pursuant to legislation or through exercise

14 of their powers under the first and second articles, ensure

15 that actual outlays do not exceed the outlays set forth in

16 such statement.

17 ‘‘SECTION 2. Total receipts for any fiscal year set

18 forth in the statement adopted pursuant to this article

19 shall not increase by a rate greater than the rate of in20 crease in national income in the year or years ending not

21 less than six months nor more than twelve months before

22 such fiscal year, unless a majority of the whole number

23 of both Houses of Congress shall have passed a bill di24 rected solely to approving specific additional receipts and

25 such bill has become law.
3

HJ 273 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may waive the provisions

2 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

3 of war is in effect.

4 ‘‘SECTION 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts

5 of the United States except those derived from borrowing

6 and total outlays shall include all outlays of the United

7 States except those for repayment of debt principal.

8 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall take effect for the sec9 ond fiscal year beginning after its ratification.

10 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple11 ment this article by appropriate legislation.’’.

Æ