alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT URT tJ.s. t)ts'rRt(:T(:ot;R'r

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS,

ANGEL GABRIEL ALAMILLA

CASE NO

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

ANGEL GABRIEL ALAMILLA, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d

261 (5th Crr. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. I I , and has entered a plea of guilty

to the One Count Superseding Information, filed on May 21 2022. After cautioning and examining

Defendant Angel Gabriel Alamilla, under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported

by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that Defendant Angel Gabriel Alamilla, under oath

concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule I l, I determined that the guilty plea waso be adjudged

guilty of Possession of a Stolen Firearmo in violation of 18 USC $ 9220) and924(a)(2), and have sentence

imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge.

/ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 3la3(aX1) unless the Court finds by clear

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released.

! The Government does not oppose release.

n The defendant has been compliant with the cument conditions of release.

r I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to

any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or

(c).

r The Government opposes release.

r The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

r If the Courl accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to I 8 U.S.C. $ 3 1a3(aX2) unless ( 1)(a) the Court finds there

is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly

shown under $ 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released.

Signed June 15,2023.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXl)(B).

rr n'rrr NORTI lliltN l)lS1'lll('T Olr TIiXAS

FILET)

$

$

$

$

$

JUN 1 5 20z3

(:t.lirrK, rJ.s.

IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Case 3:22-cr-00249-K Document 34 Filed 06/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 68
#### HAYKEL v. STATE.

No. 26142.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1953.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1953.

Dixie & Ryan, Houston, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for burglary, with punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction presents the sole question for review.

Appellant’s guilt is established by his written confession, together with proof showing his possession recently thereafter of certain property taken in the burglary. The property mentioned was found as a result of a search of appellant’s room.

Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, claiming the alleged stolen property was found in an illegal search of his private residence.

If the search was illegal, appellant should have urged an objection to the testimony at the time it was offered in evidence. This he did not do, and in failing to do so, waived any objection thereto. Moreover, proof of appellant’s possession of the alleged stolen property was established by his confession, to the introduction of which no objection was made.. Graham v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 531, 69 S.W.2d 73; Montgomery v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 469, 31 S.W.2d 440.

The same facts which appellant-claimed were obtained as a result of an-illegal search 'were before the jury from-another source, without objection, which-rendered any objection to the alleged illegal search untenable. Countee v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 131, 44 S.W.2d 994.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On' Motion for Rehearing

BELCHER, Commissioner.

'Appellant complains of the introduction in 'evidence of his confession over-his objection, however, no objection was - interposed on the ground that the confession was involuntary. No exception was . reserved to the overruling of the objection-, that was made thereto as required by - *1015Sec. 2 of Art. 759a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Consequently, the question as to the admissibility of the confession is not before us.

Witness Massey testified that he went to appellant’s apartment and found in his room the property in question. No objection being made to this testimony, no error is presented.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

Opinion approved by the Court.
# Official Journal C 235I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 235I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6317 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 235I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6317 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 235 I/01 | Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on seasonal workers in the EU in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 235 I/01

Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on seasonal workers in the EU in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 66 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 717
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37610

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff-Respondent
,

v.

MARGARET FALLON ARRONTE
,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublishe d Opinion No. 710

Filed: November 17, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial Distr ict, State of Idaho,
Minidoka County. Hon. Michael R. Crabtree , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Def ender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

__________ ______________________________________ Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Margaret Fallon Arronte pled guilty to forgery, Idaho Code § 18

- 3601

, and grand theft,

I.C. § § 18

- 2401(1), 18

- 2407(1)(b) ( 3 ) . The district court sentenced Arronte to concurrent unified

terms of ten years with two years determinate on the forgery charge and a unified term of ten

years with three years determinate on the grand theft charge

. The sente nces were suspended and

Arronte was placed on probation. After several probation violations, continued probation, and

opportunities to participate in the retained jurisdiction program, the district court relinquished

jurisdiction and ordered execution of her sentences. Arronte filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35

motion, which the district court denied. Arronte appeals.2

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound dis cretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). An appeal from the

denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent

the presentation of new information. Id. Because no new information in support of Arronte ’s

Rule 35 motion was presented, review of the sentence by this Court is precluded. For the

foregoing reasons, the district court’s order denying Arronte ’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: February 4, 2022

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, press@treasury.gov

READOUT: Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting on 

February 4, 2022

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen convened a meeting of 

the Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive and open sessions by 

videoconference. 

During the executive session, the Council received an update on the progress of the Council’s 

staff-level Hedge Fund Working Group, which was reestablished in March 2021. 

The Council also received an update on the progress of the staff-level Open-end Fund Working 

Group. The working group was established last year to assess potential risks arising from openend funds. 

Additionally, staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) presented to the Council 

on the SEC’s proposed rule on money market funds, which was released on December 15, 2021. 

The Council also heard an update from Treasury staff on its 2021 priorities and new priorities for 

2022. In particular, those priorities include climate-related financial risks, nonbank financial 

intermediation, Treasury market resiliency, and digital assets.

During the open session, the Council voted unanimously to approve a statement highlighting the 

importance of recent interagency efforts to identify and respond to potential financial stability 

risks arising from nonbank financial intermediation, and expressing support for regulatory 

reforms that would mitigate those risks. 

The Council also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on December 17, 2021. 

In attendance at the Council meeting by videoconference were the following members: 

• Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury (Chairperson of the Council)
• Jerome H. Powell, Chair, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

• Michael J. Hsu, Acting Comptroller of the Currency

• Rohit Chopra, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

• Gary Gensler, Chair, Securities and Exchange Commission

• Jelena McWilliams, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

• Rostin Behnam, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

• Sandra L. Thompson, Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency

• Todd M. Harper, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration

• Thomas Workman, Independent Member with Insurance Expertise

• Dino Falaschetti, Director, Office of Financial Research (non-voting member)

• Steven Seitz, Director, Federal Insurance Office (non-voting member)

• Charles G. Cooper, Commissioner, Texas Department of Banking (non-voting member)

• Eric Cioppa, Superintendent, Maine Bureau of Insurance (non-voting member)

• Melanie Lubin, Securities Commissioner, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, 

Securities Division (non-voting member)

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, the statement on nonbank financial 

intermediation, and meeting minutes is available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
Summary of Oral Agreements Between Andrii
Guzii and Strong Solutions Inc. (“The Company”)


 


Agreement to Advance Funds:


 


Mr. Guzii has orally agreed to advance funds to the company in the
amount of $25,000 in the event that the company should need additional capital to continue operations. In the alternative, Mr.
Guzii has orally committed to loan the company construction equipment valued at $25,000 to be used in the company’s equipment
rental business if that will be more helpful to the company. However, Mr. Guzii is only obligated to provide one of the aforementioned
advances. If the company does require this advance from Mr. Guzii, he shall retain sole discretion over which loan to give the
company.


 


Agreement to Lease Executive Office Space:


 


Mr. Guzii has orally agreed to lease office space to the company
for their principal operations. Mr. Guzii has agreed to lease the space of approximately 300 square feet to the company at no cost
for a term of one year, with the lease term expiring on June 18, 2016. Upon expiration of the lease, Mr. Guzii shall have the option
to pursue another tenant or renew the lease agreement with the company on the same terms.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29565]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Availability of a Revised Environmental Assessment/
Habitat Conservation Plan Related to Application for an Incidental Take 
Permit for the Magic Carpet Woods Association Project, Leelanau 
Township, Leelanau County, Michigan

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the Internet address listed in a 
document published in the Federal Register on November 13, 2000, 
regarding the notice of availability of a revised draft Environmental 
Assessment (EA) and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for an Incidental 
Take Permit for the Magic Carpet Woods Association Project, Leelanau 
Township, Leelanau County, Michigan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Fasbender, (612) 713-5343, peter 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a5a2b0a1a6ada7a6b183a5b4b0eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a6c6b79686f646e6f784a6c7d79246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the document announcing the notice of availability of draft EA 
and HCP for incidental take for the piping plover, FR 00-28900, 
beginning on page 67753 in the issue of November 13, 2000, make the 
following correction in the ADDRESSES section. At the end of the 1st 
paragraph in ADDRESSES section on page 67753, correct the Internet 
address to ``http://midwest.fws.gov/nepa'' from ``www/midwest.fws.gov/
nepa''.

    Dated: November 14, 2000.
T.J. Miller,
Acting, Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, 
Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 00-29565 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,883
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             128
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,426
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,069
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,782
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,787
<LOANS>                                         63,282
<ALLOWANCE>                                        882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,864
<DEPOSITS>                                      82,631
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,548
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,139
<LONG-TERM>                                        854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           303
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   5,692
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,035
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  266
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   225
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,526
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,187
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,348
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,178
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    750
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       455
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.07
<LOANS-NON>                                        654
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    71
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   778
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       66
<RECOVERIES>                                        50
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  882
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               882
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 17/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.017.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 17 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5420 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.017.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 17

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5420 January 2011

---

| Contents | | IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 28/09/COL of 29 January 2009 amending, for the sixty-eighth time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing three new chapters on the application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis, on the recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis: limitation of aid to the minimum necessary and safeguards against undue distortions of competition, and on the temporary framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis | 1 |

Contents

IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty

page

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 28/09/COL of 29 January 2009 amending, for the sixty-eighth time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by introducing three new chapters on the application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis, on the recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis: limitation of aid to the minimum necessary and safeguards against undue distortions of competition, and on the temporary framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case 1:22-cr-00061-H-BU     Document 58     Filed 02/03/23      Page 1 of 2     PageID 128

Case 1:22-cr-00061-H-BU     Document 58     Filed 02/03/23      Page 2 of 2     PageID 129
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0574

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM258AD

A320-55-1041 --- 11/26/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
POWER OF ATTORNEY


 

 Exhibit 10(iv)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY: FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

 

          The Undersigned, Robert J. O’Connell, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of C.M. Life Insurance
Company (“C.M. Life”), does hereby constitute and appoint Lawrence V. Burkett, Jr., Richard M. Howe, Stephen R. Bosworth, and Michael Berenson, and each of them individually, as his true and lawful attorneys and agents.

 

          Such attorneys and agents shall have full power of substitution and authority to take any and all action and
execute any and all instruments on the Undersigned’s behalf as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of C.M. Life that said attorneys and agents may deem necessary or advisable to enable C.M. Life to comply with the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (collectively, the “Acts”) and any rules, regulations, orders or other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “
Commission”) thereunder. This Power of Attorney authorizes such attorneys and agents to sign the Undersigned’s name on his behalf as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of C.M. Life to any and all registration statements and/or
amendments thereto, reports, instruments or documents filed or to be filed with the Commission under the Acts. Without limiting the scope of this Power of Attorney, it shall apply to filings by or on behalf of C.M. Life separate investment accounts
currently in existence or established in the future, including but not limited to those listed below.

 


		           C.M. Multi-Account A





		           C.M. Life Variable Life Separate Account I





		           Panorama Plus Separate Account




 

          The Undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Undersigned has set his hand this 21st day of July, 2000.

 


	 /s/    ROBERT 
J. O’CONNELL
        






Robert J. O’Connell

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

		 /s/    CAROL 
BITTNER
        






Witness