alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 255

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit

retroactive taxation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to prohibit retroactive taxation.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

•HJ 255 IH

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘Congress shall not increase the rate of a tax or fee

5 levied, or impose a new tax or fee, on income that is gained

6 or realized before the date of the enactment of the law

7 that causes such increase or imposes such tax, except

8 under the declaration of a national emergency by the

9 President of the United States.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 147 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 147

  To designate the month of April 1993 as ``Civil War History Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1993

Mr. Shaw introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate the month of April 1993 as ``Civil War History Month''.

Whereas the period of American history known as the ``Civil War'' is universally 
        recognized as one of the most significant landmark eras in our Nation's 
        heritage;
Whereas the continuous growth of the public's awareness of and interest in the 
        Civil War period remains an integral part of America's cultural 
        heritage;
Whereas the study, preservation, and interpretation of literature and sites 
        associated with this period are imbedded in the educational and cultural 
        heritage of our country;
Whereas the beginning of the Civil War occurred in April of 1861 with the firing 
        on Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina, and the effective ending 
        of the Civil War occurred in April of 1865 with the surrender of the 
        Army of Northern Virginia at Appomattox, Virginia, making April the most 
        important month of the year in Civil War history; and
Whereas the heritage of the Civil War deserves the attention and respect of all 
        individuals in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That April of 1993 is 
designated as ``Civil War History Month'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe the month with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cv-00300-S-BH Document 30 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 139
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-230-Y 

 § 

STEVEN KEYS (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 30, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Stockhouse
Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best
of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 31,
      2009 | /s/
      Joseph HN Lee
|-------------------------- | -----------------------
|                           | Joseph HN Lee          
|                           | Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary

1. Civil Action number: 4:22-CV-00201-V

2. Style of Case: Maurie Moore v. Carvana, LLC

3. Nature of suit: Monetary damages, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 

of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. and the Texas

Labor Code § 21.001, et seq.

4. Method of ADR used: Mediation

5. Date of ADR session: March 7, 2023

6. Outcome of ADR: Settled. The parties are drafting formal settlement documents.

Dismissal pleadings should be filed shortly.

7. TOTAL fee: $7,500.00

8. Duration of ADR: one day

9. Please list persons in attendance:

Maurie Moore

Lisa Scheibly

Emily Linn

Shanie Ensor

Demetra Makris

10. Provider information:

s/ Christopher Nolland March 8, 2023 

Signature

1717 Main Street, Suite 5550 Telephone: (214) 653-4360

Dallas, Texas 75201-4639 Facsimile: (214) 653-4343

Case 4:22-cv-00201-Y Document 26 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 110
Name and Address of Counsel:

Lisa Scheibly

Spielberger Law Group

4890 W. Kennedy Blvd., Ste. 950

Tampa, Florida 33609

Emily Linn, Esq.

Littler

100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400

Austin, Texas 78701

Case 4:22-cv-00201-Y Document 26 Filed 03/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 111
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2017By:

/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 30, 2017
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 3.1



                            AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED
                   AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          CHICAGO MINIATURE LAMP, INC.



          We, the undersigned officers of Chicago Miniature Lamp, Inc., an 
Oklahoma corporation, do hereby file this Amendment to the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, to reflect an amendment to the Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Oklahoma Secretary of State
on December 30, 1996, which amendment is set forth below:


          Article I of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is
     hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


                                   ARTICLE I


                                      NAME


          The name of the Corporation is SLI, Inc.


          The foregoing amendment was adopted in accordance with the procedures
set forth in Section 1077 of the Oklahoma General Corporation Act.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to be
signed by its President and attested by its Secretary, this 27th day of April,
1998.


                                   CHICAGO MINIATURE LAMP, INC.




                                   By  /s/ Frank M. Ward
                                      -----------------------------------
                                       Frank M. Ward, President


ATTEST:



 /s/ Richard F. Parenti
-------------------------------
 Richard F. Parenti, Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-255-Y 

 § 

JOSE SANTOS (2) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED December 15, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00255-Y Document 56 Filed 12/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 128
5S:]^oi;i!{j083®Oiia ^

/ 202366367 5 Un o OSIWa S 31 0 OR 5 6 If ) a m un^r,..^.^ofc:gaaix.^^p<>juap a / ^ JI M MATH£50 N ENERO V AN D COMMERC e ZxoOanacT.Ut M COMMITTE E fUSCDUUlTTCO : hnQ:tfm«ho«OB.hQUW.gov__^^^ ^ EMM W MI B A M auuiT V 

### Consres(s ( o f % t tlBnite b S>tate]B ( ?afltffi(nBton.3B C 20513-440 2 '*"'""C5!SL1^E'"'*^' ' Augus t 27,201 0 TTi e Honorabl

e Ra y LeHoo d^ ' ' < Secretar y ^_ ^ i.i'--i^'f

^ , U.S
. Departmen

t o f TiansportatioD iV ^ nn:^^^ ' 120 0 Ne w Jersey Ave. , S B ~ - o^ ^ Waflhington^D.C
. 2059 0 f ^ ^S ^

-. ^ .•bo^:^ : • > * ^^— I Dea r Secretar y LaHood , ^IJ^ Q

- D Ol ^ I a mwriting i

n suppor t o f the gran t applicatio n filed b

y Pcov o Cit y fo r th e Sm ^ Conuuunit y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t (SCASD ) gran

t program . -^ ' G O
Prov e City , i

n concer t wit h loca l busines s an

dothe r economi c developmen

t group s i n Uta h County , support s th e locatio n o f busines s enterprise s nea

r or o n th e ground s o f

the Prov e Municipa

l Airpor t proper . Piov o City , othe

r governmen

t entities , an

dmajo r loca l busmesse s ar

e workin g t o improve economi c condition s an dbusines s opportunitie s i n Uta h County , an

dparticipatio n i

n th e air servic e developmen

t progra mwouldjEurtfae

r tha t goal
. To assis t wit h thi s development , Prov o Cit y i s seeking $800,00 0 under th e SCAS D gran

t program . I

t i s m y understandin g tha

t thi s funding , i f

successful , wil l help brin g regularl y schedide dcommercia

l passenge r au r servic e t o Prov o Municipa

l Airport Prov o Cit

y ha s indicate dtha t aloca l matc h wil l b e provide dfo

r thi s gian t A s yo u review th e application s fo r SCAS D funding , I hop e yo u will giv e Prov o City' s application ever

y appropriat

e consideration
. Than k you for you r consideratio n of

thi s reques t

Pleas e d o no t

hesitate t o contact Kriste n Lin^e y o f

m y staf f a t 202-225-301 1 wit

h an y question s yo

u hav e regarding thi s matter . Smoerety ,



# 9VM«*N ^
JIMMATHESON Membe r o f Congres s

249 4 lUTtU M Hor n OmattniM S 24 0 GAI T MnmAviiMlM9DGaim4«23 B 92llMs m MWLISCV C f E101 B • WwGnnKOC2091M40 2 6outNSu.TUa,UTB41l S QMirCigMt.u r0470 0 Aocdoaaauoi i ivtM:(aoi)4es-iaa 6 no c (438)627-088 0 F«:C2aa)228483 S F«c(B01)4a8.141 7 fV«t436I627.147 3 Maffi s o x atcrcu a rtmr t
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 28, 2020

No. 04-19-00458-CV

Frederick Stanton DUNCAN,

Appellant

v.

Shanna Nicole DUNCAN,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-18794

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 6, 2020, after the reporter’s record was not timely filed, we ordered court 

reporter Luis Duran Jr. to file the reporter’s record in this court by January 16, 2020, or we 

would order him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. See id. R. 35.3(c). 

The reporter’s record was filed on January 15, 2020. Our January 6, 2020 order is 

satisfied. Appellant’s brief is due on February 14, 2020.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Agenda -- February 2006 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings January 26-27, 2006 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 5:00 p.m. on 

Wednesday, January 25 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and kameke.sweeney@ny.frb.org. 

Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still 

appreciated. 

I. Borrowing Estimates Central 

Estimate

Range that would 

not surprise you 

January-March 

 Ending Cash Balance 

April-June 

 Ending Cash Balance 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

FY 2006 

FY 2007 

III. Quarterly Note Issuance 

 3-year note 

 10-year note 

 10-year reopening 

 30-year bond 

2-year note, by April 

5-year note, by April 

5-year TIPS 

10-year TIPS reopening 

Discussion Topics 

1. How do you think the financing gap between your deficit estimate and current auction sizes 

should be met? What factors should Treasury consider in moving to different auction sizes? 

2. Please elaborate on the factors that influenced your estimate of the appropriate size of the 30-

year bond offering and describe market conditions in the long-end of the market. 

 

3. The 30-year bond offering will be issued in 2006 with a February/August coupon cycle. 

Should Treasury consider issuing a May/November coupon cycle in later years? Please discuss 

whether you see a need for doing so and, if so, how we might implement this.
#### WALKUP v. STATE.

No. 22057.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1942.

No attorney for appellant.

Spurgeon. E. Bell, State’s Atty., - of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The case is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts.- The procedure appears to be regular and there is nothing presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 299 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 299

          Designating May 1, 1994, as ``National Youth Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 1993

   Mr. Hilliard introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
          Designating May 1, 1994, as ``National Youth Day''.

Whereas the youth of this Nation are one of the Nation's most valuable assets;
Whereas the youth represent the future integrity, hope, and survival of the 
        Nation;
Whereas the present condition of the youth in the United States is both fragile 
        and unstable;
Whereas the relationship between the youth and their parents is in the weakest 
        condition in United States history;
Whereas today there are more youth being incarcerated and being murdered in the 
        Nation than ever before;
Whereas there is a desperate need to address the types of problems faced by our 
        youth, such as violence, substance abuse, aids and other sexually 
        transmitted diseases, lack of education, and unplanned pregnancies;
Whereas the people of the Nation should emphasize to the youth the importance of 
        family life, education, and spiritual qualities;
Whereas encouragement should be given to families to set aside a special time 
        for all family members to spend quality moments together;
Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the youth of the Nation will 
        provide an opportunity to emphasize to the youth the importance of 
        developing an ability to make the choices necessary to avoid the types 
        of problems faced by many youth;
Whereas the designation of a day to commemorate the youth of the Nation will 
        emphasize the importance of the role of the youth within the family; and
Whereas the future of the youth depends on the guidance of adults: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 1, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Youth Day'', and the President of the United 
States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon 
the people of the United States to observe the day with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
#### WINKLER v. STATE.

No. 26079.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 26, 1952.

Charles S. McMillan, San Augustine, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty.,'Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

During the June, 1952 term of thei County Court of Jasper County, Texas, appellant pleaded guilty before the court, to the charge of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Judgment was entered assessing the punishment at a fine of $50, and the fine and all costs were paid by appellant. Notice of appeal was given, however, and, after the expiration of the term, an appeal bond was entered into.

The fine assessed and all costs adjudged against, appellant having been paid, the question raised on this appeal has become moot.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Athens and Meigs Counties, Ohio

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Retraction of notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
retraction of the Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement for a proposed highway project in Athens and Meigs Counties, 
Ohio, that was originally published in the Federal Register on October 
19, 1999.
    The FHWA determined environmental studies to document consultations 
between the Ohio Department of Transportation and FHWA were necessary. 
Based on these environmental studies, FHWA has determined that 
potentially significant impacts were avoided and the Finding Of No 
Significant Impact designation remains valid. An Environmental Impact 
Statement will not be prepared.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Andreas Garnes, Rural Programs 
Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 200 N. High Street, Room 328, 
Columbus, Ohio 43215, Telephone: (614) 280-6856.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program)

    Issued on: November 8, 2000.
Andreas Garnes,
Rural Programs Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, Columbus, 
Ohio.
[FR Doc. 00-29481 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
arc_ex105.htm

EXHIBIT 10.5
   
  
   
  	 
	1

	  

	 

   
  
  
 
    	 
	2

	  

	 


   
  
   
  	
	  3


	  

	 

   
  
   
   4
Case 7:22-cr-00032-O Document 45 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 82
Case 7:22-cr-00032-O Document 45 Filed 11/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 83
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 285

AMENDMENT
In the Senate of the United States,

September 21 (legislative day, September 12), 1994.

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. Con. Res. 285) entitled ‘‘Concurrent resolution directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical

corrections in the enrollment of S. 2182’’ do pass with the

following

AMENDMENT:

Page 1, after line 11, insert:

1 (3) In section 132(a)(1)(C), strike out ‘‘(de2 scribed in subsection (i))’’ and insert in lieu thereof

3 ‘‘(described in subsection (h))’’.

4 (4) In section 924, strike out ‘‘Court of Military

5 Criminal Appeals’’ each place it appears and insert

6 in lieu thereof ‘‘Court of Criminal Appeals’’.

7 (5) In section 1661(b)(4)—
2

H CON RES 285 EAS

1 (A) strike out ‘‘by adding at the end’’ in

2 subparagraph (A) and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘by

3 inserting after section 3020’’; and

4 (B) strike out ‘‘by adding at the end’’ in

5 subparagraph (B) and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘by

6 inserting after section 8020’’.

7 (6) In section 2832, strike out ‘‘Authority’’ each

8 place it appears (other than in the caption of sub9 section (b)) and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘Agency’’.

Attest:

Secretary.