alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 11685-001 Ohio]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for an original license for the proposed Stockport Mill Country Inn Water Power Project, located on the Muskingum River, near the town of Stockport, Morgan County, Ohio, and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project. In the EA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the project and has concluded that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental protection measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

                    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference Branch, Room 2-A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm.*                     Please call (202) 208-2222 for assistance. For further information about the EA, contact Tom Dean at (202) 219-2778.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29699  Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Official Journal C 180/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 180 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5919 May 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 180

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5919 May 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 180/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 180/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 180/2 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 2 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 180/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7972 — ITW/EF&C) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2016/C 180/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7786 — VISA Inc./VISA Europe) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 180/5 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2) point (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 180/2

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 180/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7972 — ITW/EF&C) (
  1
  )

1

3

2016/C 180/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7786 — VISA Inc./VISA Europe) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2016/C 180/5

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2) point (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69923-69924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29678]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-6-001]

Kansas Pipeline Company; Notice of Revised Tariff Filing

November 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 8, 2000, Kansas Pipeline Company (KPC) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, the following revised tariff sheets, to be effective November 1, 
2000. The revised tariff sheets, listed below, include provisions for 
imbalance trading and netting services:

Second Revised Sheet No. 239
Original Sheet No. 239A
First Revised Sheet No. 240
Original Sheet No. 240A
Second Revised Sheet No. 242
Second Revised Sheet No. 250
Original Sheet No. 250A
Original Sheet No. 250B
Original Sheet No. 250C

    KPC states that copies of this filing have been served on all 
Kansas Pipeline Company customers and state commissions involved in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

[[Page 69924]]

on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29678 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Monroe Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McShane, J.), rendered March 22, 1979, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was arrested by the police based upon information received from a confidential informant. He contends that because the police did not prove the informant’s basis of knowledge and reliability, the arrest lacked probable cause. We disagree. The record before the hearing court shows that the informant had a basis for his knowledge which was corroborated as to the time of the incident and other details by an eyewitness’s account. Under these circumstances, the reliability of the informant was sufficiently established to provide the police with probable cause to arrest the defendant *(see, People v Johnson,*66 NY2d 398, 402; *People v Basnight,*
      *658162 AD2d 456). Accordingly, the hearing court did not err when it declined to suppress testimony concerning the identifications of the defendant in a lineup and the defendant’s inculpatory statement made after his arrest.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Eiber, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A210843, A21A0844. JENNIFER FOLEY AS ADMINISTRATOR et al. v.

MARSH COVE APARTMENTS, LLC et al.; and vice versa.

After we granted appellants’ application for interlocutory appeal from a partial

grant of defendants’ motion to dismiss, appellants filed their notice of appeal below.

On January 11, 2021, the appeal and defendants’ cross-appeal were docketed as our

Case Nos. A21A0843 and A21A0844. 

Having reviewed the entire record and the relevant law, we now DISMISS the

first appeal as IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED, with the result that we lack

jurisdiction over the cross-appeal, which is also DISMISSED. See Robinson v.

Robinson, 174 Ga. App. 656, 657 (2) (331 SE2d 8) (1985) (even if the grant of an

application for interlocutory appeal gave another party a right to pursue a direct crossappeal, the jurisdictional basis of that cross-appeal “must be deemed to have

disappeared with the dismissal of the main appeal”). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 24, 2021

08/24/2021
NoRrHErSLDjStrre'r"oTTexAs

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WALTER VASQUEZ (1)

Date: May 26,2022

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

FOR THE NORTMRN DISTRICT OF

DALLAS DIVISION

CASENO.:

$

$

$

$

$

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

WALTER VASeUEZ (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997)'

has appeared before me pJrsuantio r.o. R. crim.p. ll, and has entered a pleaof guilty to count(s) I of the Indictment

Afteicautioning and 

"*u1nining 

WALTER VASeUEZ (l) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule

l l, I determinei that the guiltiplea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged is supported by an

iniependent basis in ru.t iontuining each of the esiential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of

guiliy be accepted, and that WALTER vASeuEZ (l) be adjudged guilty of 8 l{.s.c. $ 1326(a) Illegal Reentry After

Removal from the United States and have senGnce imposed uicordingty. After being found guilty of the offense by the

distril judge,

(,/ t A The defendant is cunently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

(

tr The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 31a3(aXl) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

I The Government does not oppose release'

n The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

n I find by clear and convincin! evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person tr the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or (c)'

The Government opposes release.

The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon

Government.

n

n

n

motion of the

! The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 31a3(aX2) unless (l)(a) the Court finds there is a

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Govemment has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under g 3la5(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court fr19P :Ii-d convincing evidence

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other persopffiommunity if released'

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the-date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved pu.ty f.or attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned united states

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bX1XB)'

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00055-N Document 27 Filed 05/26/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 41
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for MSCCG Trust 2015-ALDR Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2015-ALDR

 

Per the Trust and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 5, 2015 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

March 2, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case 2:22-cv-00146-Z Document 42 Filed 12/12/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 566
Case 2:22-cv-00146-Z Document 42 Filed 12/12/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 567
Case 2:22-cv-00146-Z Document 42 Filed 12/12/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 568
Case 2:22-cv-00146-Z Document 42 Filed 12/12/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 569
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    Notice is hereby given that on November 3, 2000, a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *The Detroit Edison Company, et al.,*                     Civil Action No. 00-74844, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. This Consent Decree represents a settlement of claims brought against the Detroit Edison Company, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation (“Settling Defendants”) in the above-referenced action under Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Recovery Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9607, to recover costs incurred by the United States in connection with the J.E. Berger Superfund Site in Detroit, Michigan.                

                    The Department of Justice will receive a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611, and should refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *The Detroit Edison Company, et al.*                     (E.D. Mich.), D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-06946.                

The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, 211 West Fort Street, Suite 2001, Detroit, Michigan 48226-3211, and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $5.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bruce S. Gelber,

Chief Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00-29541  Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69572-69573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29480]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-957-00-1420-BJ: G01-0033]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 69573]]

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Oregon State Office, Portland, 
Oregon, thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication.

Willamette Meridian

Oregon

T. 31 S., R. 15 W., accepted September 22, 2000
T. 11 S., R. 21 E., accepted October 20, 2000

Washington

T. 27 S., R. 34 E., accepted February 4, 1999
T. 22 S., R. 11 W., accepted October 5, 2000
T. 33 S., R. 17 E., accepted October 20, 2000

    If protests against a survey, as shown on any of the above plat(s), 
are received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest(s). A plat will not be 
officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed 
and become final or appeals from the dismissal affirmed.
    The plat(s) will be placed in the open files of the Oregon State 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1515 S.W. 5th Avenue, Portland, 
Oregon 97201, and will be available to the public as a matter of 
information only. Copies of the plat(s) may be obtained from the above 
office upon required payment. A person or party who wishes to protest 
against a survey must file with the State Director, Bureau of Land 
Management, Portland, Oregon, a notice that they wish to protest prior 
to the proposed official filing date given above. A statement of 
reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice of protest to the 
State Director, or the statement of reasons must be filed with the 
State Director within thirty (30) days after the proposed official 
filing date.
    The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, survey, and 
subdivision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management (1515 S.W. 
5th Avenue), P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208.

    Dated: October 31, 2000.
Robert D. DeViney, Jr.,
Branch of Realty and Records Services.
[FR Doc. 00-29480 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lance A. Friedman, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the suppression court’s determination that the police had probable cause to believe that defendant’s automobile contained contraband. The contraband which was inadvertently discovered by a *925volunteer firefighter who had administered medical care and treatment to defendant following an automobile accident, and which had been turned over to the police, provided sufficient probable cause to believe that defendant’s automobile might contain additional contraband. The removal of defendant’s vehicle from the highway to a private garage where it had been towed following the accident does not undermine the propriety of the search *(see, People v Milerson,*51 NY2d 919, 921). Thus, the warrantless search of defendant’s automobile was justified by the automobile exception to the warrant requirement of the Constitution *(see, People v Orlando,*56 NY2d 441; *People v Belton,*55 NY2d 49, *rearg denied*56 NY2d 646). In view of this conclusion, we need not address defendant’s contention that the People’s proof at the suppression hearing was insufficient to establish that the search was conducted pursuant to standard police procedures authorizing the inventory search of impounded vehicles (see, *People v Blasich,*73 NY2d 673, 677, n 1). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KALAN GOLD
CORPORATION UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,446,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,457,003
<PP&E>                                         942,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                 414,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,520,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          939,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           950
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,678,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,520,041
<SALES>                                      1,170,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,212,268
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                751,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            751,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   751,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>