alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [MT-920-00-1310-FI-P; MTM 89255] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Under Pub. L. 97-451, the lessee timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease MTM 89255, Sweet Grass County, Montana . The lessee paid the required rental accruing from the date of termination. 

                        We haven't issued any leases affecting the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $5 per acre and 16                        2/3                         percent respectively. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $125 cost for publishing this Notice.                     

The lessee has met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination subject to: 
      - The original terms and conditions of the lease;
      - The increased rental of $5 per acre;
      - The increased royalty of 162/3                         percent.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen L. Johnson, Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section, BLM Montana State Office, PO Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107, 406-896-5098. 

Dated: November 3, 2000. 

Karen L. Johnson, 

Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section. 

[FR Doc. 00-29479 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
# Official Journal L 247/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 247 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6226 September 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 247

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6226 September 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1390 of 31 July 2019 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1390 of 31 July 2019 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 319

Directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to propose to the

Congress, not later than May 18, 1994, possible solutions to the impending deficit in the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1994

Mr. BACHUS of Alabama (for himself and Mr. EWING) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to

propose to the Congress, not later than May 18, 1994,

possible solutions to the impending deficit in the Federal

Disability Insurance Trust Fund.

Whereas the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund established under title II of the Social Security Act is expected

to run out of money by the end of 1995;

Whereas the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund paid

in 1992 more than $31,000,000,000 in benefits and these

payments are expected to increase dramatically in the

future;
2

•HJ 319 IH

Whereas solutions are needed to replenish the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund prior to the end of 1995;

Whereas taking money out of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund is not an acceptable solution;

Whereas taking money out of the general fund of the Treasury, thereby adding to the deficit, is not an acceptable solution; and

Whereas a lack of action could negatively impact the Federal

Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund affecting

its over 36,000,000 beneficiaries: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall,

4 as soon as possible after the enactment of this Joint Reso5 lution, conduct a study of the factors threatening the sol6 vency of the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund and

7 shall, not later than May 18, 1994, submit a report to

8 each House of the Congress setting forth the results of

9 such study, together with proposals of possible solutions

10 to the impending deficit in the Federal Disability Insur11 ance Trust Fund.

Æ
#### ANDREWS v. STATE.

No. 21693.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1941.

Rehearing Granted Oct. 15, 1941.

M. E. Lawrence, of Eastland, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to murder, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Rehearing.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Motion was duly filed for a rehearing. This was accompanied by a supplemental transcript and statement of facts, indicating that it was the error of the clerk of the district court in not filing the same originally. The motion for rehearing is granted and the case will now be considered on its merits.

The supplemental transcript contains a number of bills of exception taken to the charge of the court, in each of which (it is set out that the court erred in overruling the objections and exceptions to the court’s charge,, but in each case the bill fails to show what the exceptions were and just what portion of the charge he considered objectionable. We are unable to determine from the bills just what counsel has in mind and, therefore, could not be able to say that error was committed. Each of-said bills must be overruled as improper bills.

The other bills of exception are not approved by the court, but specifically refused because he says that no exception was taken by counsel for the defendant at the time. These, therefore, are not for our consideration. ,

We find no error apparent in the record. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November                  15, 2007 | /s/  Laurence                  P. Birch                                                                                                                                             |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 | Laurence                  P. Birch                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                                 | President                  and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Acting                  Chief                  Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  |

----
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Dominic Phillips, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Samsara Inc. for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2022 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Samsara Inc.


Date:March 30, 2022By:/s/ Dominic PhillipsDominic PhillipsChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

DAVID RAY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-438-O-BP 

 §

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL §

SECURITY, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in 

this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation is ripe for review. 

The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain 

error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED, 

this case is REVERSED, and it is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative 

action.

SO ORDERED on this 22nd day of November, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00438-O Document 26 Filed 11/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 679
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Valrico Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Valrico, Florida

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Valrico Bancorp, Inc. as of
June 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income for the
quarters, and six months ended June 30, 2000 and June 30, 1999, and the
consolidated statements of cash flow and stockholders' equity for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 and June 30, 1999. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquires of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                    \s\ Rex Meighen & Company
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Rex Meighen & Company
                                                    Certified Public Accountants


Tampa, Florida
August 7, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DEREK BURBAGE, §

§ No. 255, 2015

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court of 

§ the State of Delaware 

v. §

§ Cr. ID No. 1406022376

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: December 23, 2015

Decided: March 1, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.

ORDER

This 1st day of March 2016, having considered the no-merit brief and motion 

to withdraw filed by the appellant’s counsel and the response filed by the State of 

Delaware, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On February 25, 2015, after a three-day trial, a jury found the 

appellant, Derek Burbage, guilty of five counts of Reckless Endangering in the 

Second Degree, four counts of Assault in the Second Degree, and one count of 

Criminal Mischief. After a presentence investigation, the Superior Court 

sentenced Burbage to a total of twenty-seven years at Level V, suspended after 

eight years for two years at Level IV, suspended after six months for concurrent 

terms of Level III and II probation. This is Burbage’s direct appeal.
2

(2) On appeal, Burbage’s appellate counsel (“Counsel”)1 has filed a nomerit brief and a motion to withdraw under Supreme Court Rule 26(c).2

 Counsel 

asserts that, based upon a complete and careful examination of the record, there are 

no arguably appealable issues. Counsel represents that he provided Burbage with a 

copy of the motion to withdraw, Rule 26, and the no-merit brief in draft form, and 

a letter requesting that Burbage send him written points for the Court’s 

consideration. Burbage did not submit any points for the Court’s consideration. 

The State has responded to the Rule 26(c) brief and has moved to affirm the 

Superior Court’s judgment.

(3) When reviewing a motion to withdraw and an accompanying brief 

under Rule 26(c), the Court must be satisfied that the appellant’s counsel has made 

a conscientious examination of the record and the law for arguable claims.3

 Also, 

the Court must conduct its own review of the record and determine “whether the 

appeal is indeed so frivolous that it may be decided without an adversary 

presentation.”4

 

1 Burbage was represented by different counsel in the Superior Court.

2 See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 26(c) (governing appeals without merit).

3 Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 486 U.S. 

429, 442 (1988); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).

4 Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. at 81.
3

(4) In this case, having conducted “a full examination of all the 

proceedings” and having found “no nonfrivolous issue for appeal,”5 the Court 

concludes that Burbage’s appeal “is wholly without merit.”6

 The Court is 

satisfied that Counsel made a conscientious effort to examine the record and the 

law and properly determined that Burbage could not raise a meritorious claim on

appeal.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm is 

GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. The motion to 

withdraw is moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice

 

5 Id. at 80.

6 Supra note 2.
International Programs 

The Department of the Treasury’s FY 2022 budget request for International Programs is included 

in the State, Foreign Operations, and Other Related Programs Appropriation. 

Treasury’s International Programs Justification of Appropriations can be found at the following: 

https://home.treasury.gov/about/budget-financial-reporting-planning-and-performance/budgetrequestannual-performance-plan-and-reports/treasury-international-programs-justification-ofappropriations
# QSBL 033119

# QSBL 123118

# QSBL 093018

# QSBL 063018

# QSBL 033118

# QSBL 123117

# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69579-69580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on December 5, 2000, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that 
relate solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and 
information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

[[Page 69580]]

Tuesday, December 5, 2000--1 p.m. Until the Conclusion of Business

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EST). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
James E. Lyons,
Associate Director for Technical Support, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 00-29461 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Case 4:22-cr-00225-O Document 22 Filed 09/07/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 38
Case 4:22-cr-00225-O Document 22 Filed 09/07/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 39
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ZVI KRIPLE,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-cv-788-P

PAUL ELLARD,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In this case, Plaintiff has filed a civil case with a complaint and a 

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1-2. The case 

was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey 

L. Cureton, for submission to this Court of findings, conclusions and 

recommendations (“FCRs”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On 

October 4, 2022, Judge Cureton submitted Findings and Conclusions. 

See ECF No. 8. Plaintiff filed an objection to the FCR on October 12, 

2022. See ECF No. 9. 

Plaintiff’s objection to the FCR is contrary to the motion to proceed 

in forma pauperis, in which Plaintiff states that he anticipates receiving 

$12,000 a month in monthly income. Thus, having conducted a de novo

review of Plaintiff’s objection to the FCR and all relevant matters of 

record in this case, including the FCR of the United States Magistrate 

Judge (ECF No. 8), the Court concludes that the Plaintiff’s objection is

without merit. The Court thus ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Conclusions as its own.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff’s 

complaint will be dismissed without further notice under Federal Rule 

Case 4:22-cv-00788-P Document 10 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 43
2

of Civil Procedure 41(b) if Plaintiff fails to pay to the clerk of Court the 

filing and administrative fees of $402.00 by October 25, 2022. 

SO ORDERED on this 18th day of October 2022.

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00788-P Document 10 Filed 10/18/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 44