alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, S. JamesMiller, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ImageWare Systems, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: |   | August 14, 2006 |   | /s/ S. James Miller     |
|--------|--------|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |                 |   | S. James Miller         |
|   |   |                 |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

------------------------------------------------------- X

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

X

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

-------------------------------------------------------

GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION GROUPS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL

Pursuant to Local Rule 83.10(a), movants Brady United Against Gun Violence, 

Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, and March For Our Lives (the “Gun Violence 

Prevention Groups”) respectfully request this Court’s leave to participate in the 

matter before the court without local counsel. In a contemporaneously filed motion, 

the Gun Violence Prevention Groups seek leave from this Court to file an amici curiae 

brief in support of the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. An order 

granting leave to file an amici curiae brief with the Court would likely end the need 

for the Gun Violence Prevention Groups’ continued participation in this litigation 

before the Court.

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Gun Violence Prevention Groups 

respectfully seek this Court’s leave to proceed as movants and as prospective amici

curiae without local counsel licensed in Texas before this Court. Additionally, a 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 43 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 519
2

proposed order is attached to this motion and will be emailed to chambers in a word 

processing format.

August 30, 2022 Respectfully Submitted,

By: /s/ Daniel Grooms

ADAM M. KATZ*

RACHEL ALPERT*

COOLEY LLP

500 Boylston Street

Boston, MA 02116

Telephone: (617) 937-2300

akatz@cooley.com

ralpert@cooley.com 

DANIEL GROOMS*

MATT K. NGUYEN*

COOLEY LLP

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: (202) 842-7800

dgrooms@cooley.com

mnguyen@cooley.com

*pro hac vice forthcoming

Counsel for Amici Curiae

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 43 Filed 08/30/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 520
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 30th day of August 2022, a true and accurate copy 

of the foregoing motion was served via the Court’s CM/ECF system to all counsel of 

record.

August 30, 2022 Respectfully Submitted,

By: /s/ Daniel Grooms

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 43 Filed 08/30/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 521
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph Ragan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ferroglobe PLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted in
accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 2, 2016



By:

/s/ Joseph RaganChief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.14


 


FIRST ADDENDUM TO THE CONSULTANCY
AGREEMENT


 


This First Addendum to the Consultancy Agreement (the “Addendum”)
is entered by and between:


 


P.V. NanoCell Ltd., with head
office located at 8 Ha' Masger St., Migdal Ha’Emek 23100, P.O. Box 236, Israel ("PV"); and


 


Dolev Bar-Guy Consulting and Management
Ltd., with head office located at 7 Bialik Street, Zichron Ya'akov, Israel. A company fully owned by Dr. Fernando de la Vega
(the “Company”).


 


	 	WHEREAS	the above parties have executed that certain Consultancy Agreement, effective as of September 9, 2009 (the “Consultancy Agreement”); and


 


	 	WHEREAS	the parties wish to amend certain provisions of the Consultancy Agreement as further detailed herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree
as follows:


 


	 	1.	The preamble hereto constitutes an integral and binding part of this Addendum. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Addendum shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement. All other sections of the Agreement, if not amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	 	2.	The parties agree to amend and restate Section 4 to the Consultancy Agreement effective retroactive to August 1st 2011 to read as follows:


 


	 	4.	Period of the Agreement


 


	 	4.1	This Agreement is made for an undefined term. Each party may, at any time, terminate this Agreement by a 30 days prior written notice to the other party.
	 	 	 
	 	4.2	Each party may terminate this Agreement if the other
    party commits a breach of the Agreement and does not cure such breach within 14 days after receipt of a written notice from
    the injured part.
	 	 	 
	 	4.3	Except as provided in Paragraph
    4 above or by law, termination of this Agreement is without liability of PV for any claims or payments beyond those earned
    or accrued in the course of the engagement hereunder; and the Company hereby waives any and all such claims towards PV, its
    Affiliates and any other third party.



 







	 	3.	This Addendum may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which together
will constitute one and the same instrument.


 






    	 



    	 	 	 



    

 


And in Witness,
the parties sign this Agreement on this 9th day of April 2013.


 


		 	
	
        Dolev Bar-Guy Consulting
and Management Ltd.
	 	P.V.
    NanoCell Ltd.


 


I, the undersigned, hereby confirm that I have read this
Addendum, that its content is acceptable to me and that I will act in accordance with its terms.


 





		 
	Dr. Fernando
de la Vega
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as theChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: April 30,  2010 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham                   |
|----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Steven C. Oldham,                      |
|                       |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit tothe Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
Rel: June 7, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT

OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2023-0690

Jessie Smith, Gail Smith, Lee McKee, Aleshia McKee, Joseph Freda, and 

Katrina Williams v. Auburn Oaks, LLC (Appeal from Macon Circuit 

Court: CV-20-900057).

MENDHEIM, Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(E), Ala. R. App. P.

Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Bryan, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Digital Applications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Chee Hong Leong, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                          /s/ Chee Hong Leong
                                          -------------------
                                              Chee Hong Leong
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              November 16, 2004
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 44

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing

the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of physical desecration

of the flag of the United States and to set criminal penalties for that

act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of physical desecration of the flag of the

United States and to set criminal penalties for that

act.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

•HJ 44 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica2 tion:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘The Congress and the States shall have power to

5 prohibit the act of physical desecration of the flag of the

6 United States and to set criminal penalties for that act.’’.

Æ
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20300

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-M-165-2

 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Garza appeals from an order of the district court

denying his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s pretrial

detention order. The district court’s decision, which effectively

adopted the reasoning of the magistrate judge, rests upon its

conclusion that Garza has not rebutted the presumption that no

condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the
1 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f).

2 See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.

1992) (“[T]he risk of continued narcotics trafficking on bail does

constitute a risk to the community.”).

2

safety of the community.1 The district court’s conclusions are

supported by the record.2

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT(S)

The Court has independently determined that the document(s) below should be stricken and unfiled. Accordingly, it is ordered 

that the document(s) is/are stricken from the record of this case, and the Clerk is directed to note on the docket that the 

document(s) has/have been unfiled.

DATE U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

Judge:

Case Number: Style:

Date:

*******************

1. A civil cover sheet must be filed with the complaint. See LR 3.1(a) or LR 3.2(c).

2. The document(s) must be in proper form. See LR 10.1 or LCrR 49.3.

3. The signature of the attorney of record, which includes a party proceeding pro se, is required on each

A(n) has been filed by

 and is considered deficient in the area(s) noted below:

document filed. See FED. R. Civ. P. 11(a), FED. R. Crim. P. 49(d), LR 11.1(b), or LCrR 49.5(b).

5. Each separate document contained therein must be identified. See LR 5.1(c) or LCrR 49.2(c).

4. A completed certificate of service is required. See FED. R. Civ. P. 5(d) or FED. R. Crim. P. 49(d).

6. The motion or response must include:

brief in support of motion. See LR 7.1(d), LR 56.5(a), or LCrR 47.1(d).

certificate of conference or inability to confer. See LR 7.1(b) or LCrR 47.1(b).

proposed order. See LR 7.1(c) or LCrR 47.1(c).

documentary or non-documentary evidence in a separate appendix. See LR 7.1(i) or LR 56.6.

a.

b.

c.

d.

See LR 15.1(a) and (b). If the motion for leave to amend is filed on paper, the motion must be

accompanied by an original and second copy of the proposed amended pleading that is neither attached to the

motion nor made an exhibit to the motion. See LR 15.1(a).

7. A motion for leave to amend must have a copy of the proposed amended pleading attached as an exhibit.

8. A motion for continuance of a trial setting must be signed by the party as well as by the attorney of record.

See LR 40.1.

10. Additional copies are required. See LR 5.1(b) or LCrR 49.2(b).

9. An attorney seeking pro hac vice admission must apply for admission on an approved form and pay the

11. The attorney filing the pleading is not admitted to practice in this district. See LR 83.7 or LCrR 57.7.

applicable fee. See LR 83.9(b) or LCrR 57.9(b).

12. The document requires a separately signed certificate of interested persons. See LR 3.1(c), LR 3.2(e),

13. Other:

LR 7.4, LR 81.1 (a)(3)(D), or LR 81.2.

2/03/2023Mark T. Pittman 02/03/2023 4:22-cv-0825-P Response to Plaintiffs' Report Regarding the Recession of the COVID-19 Vaccination Requirement Defendants✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

A request seeking that the Court stay a case must be filed as a motion and comply with LR 7.1.

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 66 Filed 02/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1377
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0065

_________________

L. CRAIG SEMENZA,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

HOLLISTER A. LARSON, et al., HOLLY JEAN 

LARSON, both individually and collectively d/b/a 

FIRST & MAIN BUILDING,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to L. Craig Semenza, to all counsel of 

record, and to the Honorable Heidi J. Ulbricht, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 1 2023

02/01/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0065
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-88-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

November 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 10 
and Thirtieth Revised Sheet No. 11, to be effective January 1, 2001.
    CIG states the purpose of this filing is to permit CIG to collect 
Gas Research Institute (GRI) charges associated with its transportation 
pursuant to the Commission's order issued September 19, 2000 in Docket 
No. RP00-313-000.
    CIG further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
CIG's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http.//
www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at
http.//www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29683 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4:00PM EDT: May 7, 2014

CONTACT: Treasury Public Affairs (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING MAY 7, 2014

WASHINGTON – Secretary Lew today convened a meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight 

Council in a closed session followed by an open session at the Treasury Department. 

During the meeting, the Council continued its discussion of the nonbank financial company 

designations process under section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Consistent with the Council’s 

rule and guidance, the Council will not name any company under review in this process until a 

final designation has been made. 

The Council also discussed the final draft of its 2014 annual report, before moving into the open 

session, at which it approved the annual report, revisions to the Council’s transparency policy, 

bylaws for its Deputies Committee, and the minutes from its previous meeting. 

In addition, during the closed session, Secretary Lew discussed the status of targeted financial 

sanctions related to the situation in Ukraine and noted the impact these sanctions are having on 

the Russian economy. 

Additional information regarding the Council and its work, including the annual report, 

transparency policy, Deputies Committee bylaws, and meeting minutes, is available on 

www.fsoc.gov.

###