alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)WELLS FARGO                        **CommercialMortgage Servicing**

D1050-084, 8thFloor 

401 South TryonStreet 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334

 

 

**ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

** **

Reference is hereby made to that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2015, by and among Morgan StanleyCapital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C23 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of SpecialServicing do hereby certify that:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicerduring the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has beenmade under my supervision,and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer, has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReportingPeriod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2018.

 

 

/s/ DanielMarthinsen

DanielMarthinsen 

ManagingDirector 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

WellsFargo Bank,N.A.                                                                        (logo)Together we’ll go far
Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 400 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1259
# Official Journal L 52/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 52 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6525 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 52

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6525 February 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/331 of 25 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/331 of 25 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00103-CV

Appellant, Fredericksburg Remodeling Company, Inc.// Cross-Appellants, Patrick Fisher 

and Stephanie Fisher

v.

Appellees, Patrick Fisher and Stephanie Fisher// Cross-Appellee, Fredericksburg 

Remodeling Company, Inc.

FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY

NO. CV08971, THE HONORABLE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We received Fredericksburg Remodeling Company’s notice of appeal on 

February 17, 2023, and cross-appellants Patrick Fisher and Stephanie Fisher’s notice of appeal in 

May 2023. On August 2, 2023, Fredericksburg Remodeling Company (Fredericksburg 

Remodeling) “file[d a] Notice of Nonsuit as to all causes of action asserted against Appellee and 

Defendant.” On August 10, the Fishers filed a “Notice of Nonsuit of all claims of lower Court 

error or causes of action against Fredericksburg Remodeling . . . .” Neither of these filings were 

accompanied by a certificate of conference. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a). Neither party moved 

us to dismiss the appeal.

On August 28, 2023, we instructed the parties to file either an agreed motion to 

dismiss the appeal and cross-appeal or a status report by September 5, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 
2

10.1 and 42.1. The parties did not file anything in response to our notice. On October 11, 2023, 

we notified the parties that Fredericksburg Remodeling’s brief was due on June 23, 2023, and 

neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief had been filed. We instructed 

the parties that we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution if Fredericksburg Remodeling 

did not file a brief or a motion for extension of time to file a brief by October 23, 2023. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3. Fredericksburg Remodeling did not file anything in response to our notice. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and cross-appeal for want of prosecution. See 

id., 38.8(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: December 15, 2023
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





S. James
Miller, Chief Executive Officer of ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),
and Wayne Wetherell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.  
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





2.  
The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Quarterly Report and the results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by the Quarterly Report.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the
24th day of February, 2010.




/s/    S.
      James MillerS.
      James Miller
                Chief
      Executive Officer
 /s/    Wayne
      WetherellWayne
      Wetherell
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
                        (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWare
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Clark/Balfour Beatty - NCE, A Joint Venture ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912DR-07-C-0027 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 60550, 60551 

Robert M. Moore, Esq. 

Robert D. Windus, Esq. 

Moore & Lee, LLP 

McLean, VA 

Thomas J. Warren, Esq. 

Acting Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Raymond 0. Schlee, Esq. 

Assistant District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Baltimore 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

By motion filed on 12 December 2017, the parties jointly moved for the dismissal 

of these appeals and the corresponding government affirmative claims with prejudice. 

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. 

Dated: 14 December 201 7 

J.REI OUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60550, 60551, Appeals of 

Clark/Balfour Beatty - NCE, A Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the 

Board's Charter. 

Dated: DEC 1 5 2017 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History: Annual                               
|View History: Annual                               
|View History:                                      
|                                                   
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                   
|                                                   
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           | 4,563,077 | 4,331,414 | 4,282,513 | 4,447,885 | 4,322,444 | 4,717,543 | 4,770,502 | 4,947,223 | 4,996,209
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 5,003,548 | 4,970,134 | 5,027,996 | 5,121,528 | 5,066,188 | NA        | 5,240,599 | NA        | 5,489,012 | 5,446,901
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,567,302 | 5,546,922 | 5,485,046 | 5,610,023 | 5,696,991 | 5,591,488 | 5,559,307 | 5,535,814 | 5,368,598 | 5,261,068
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,396,958 | 5,454,772 | 5,580,035 | 5,709,293 | 5,918,915 | 6,004,798 | 6,009,079 | 6,170,199 | 6,344,216 | 6,165,265
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,344,105 | 5,651,940 | 5,946,250 | 5,956,909 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
**Exhibit 34.4**

 (logo) Grant Thornton 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Board of Directors

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC

 

Audit · Tax ·Advisory

 

Grant Thornton LLP

1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2200

Kansas City, MO 64106

 

T 816.412.2400

F 816.412.2404

www.GrantThornton.com 

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanyingManagement’s Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”),that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (formerly known as Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.)(the “Company”) compliedwith the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe Company’s Operating or Trust Advisor Services (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31,2015, excluding criteria which management has determined are not applicable in Exhibit A. The Platform consists of asset-backedtransactions and securities for which the Company acted as operating or trust advisor and as defined by management in Exhibit Bof Management’s Report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards ofthe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence aboutthe Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures aswe considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securitiesconstituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securitiesin compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not haveincluded servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examinationwas not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that mayhave affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company compliedwith the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, inall material respects.

  

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Kansas City, MO

February 29, 2016
AO 435

(Rev. 04/18) ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE DATE:

Please Read Instructions:

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. '(/,9(5< ADDRESS25(0$,/ 5. CITY 6. STATE 7. ZIP CODE

8. CASE NUMBER 9. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

10. FROM 11. TO

12. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

13. CITY 14. STATE

15. ORDER FOR

u APPEAL u CRIMINAL u CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT u BANKRUPTCY

u NON-APPEAL u CIVIL u IN FORMA PAUPERIS u OTHER (Specify)

16. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

u VOIR DIRE u TESTIMONY (Specify Witness)

u OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

u OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

u CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff) u PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING (Spcy)

u CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

u OPINION OF COURT

u JURY INSTRUCTIONS u OTHER (Specify)

u SENTENCING

u BAIL HEARING

17. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL

(Includes Certified Copy to

Clerk for Records of the Court)

FIRST COPY ADDITIONAL

COPIES NO. OF PAGES ESTIMATE COSTS

ORDINARY

NO. OF COPIES

u u

14-Day

NO. OF COPIES

u u

EXPEDITED

NO. OF COPIES

u u

3-Day

NO. OF COPIES

u u

DAILY

NO. OF COPIES

u u

HOURLY

NO. OF COPIES

u u

REALTIME u u

CERTIFICATION (18. & 19.)

By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

ESTIMATE TOTAL

$ 0.00

18. SIGNATURE PROCESSED BY

19. DATE PHONE NUMBER

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY COURT ADDRESS

DATE BY

ORDER RECEIVED

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES $ 0.00

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT $ 0.00

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE $ 0.00

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

Adam S. Hochschild (314) 503-0326 5/10/2023

adam@hochschildlaw.com Plainfield VT 05667

4:22-cv-825 Pittman; Ray (mediator) 4/26/2023 4/26/2023

Jackson et al. v. Mayorkas et al. Fort Worth Texas

4/26/2023 sealed conference

0.00

/s/ Adam S. Hochschild

5/10/2023

0.00

0.00

0.00

Case 4:22-cv-00825-P Document 81 Filed 05/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1836
# CE2004065EN.01009801.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/98

---

(2004/C 65 E/111)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1877/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(6 June 2003)

Subject:   Prospectus-delegation

Subject:

Will the Commission estimate the proportion of prospectuses approved in Member States in the last calendar year that were approved directly by a competent authority, and the proportion that were approved by authorities such as exchanges or intermediaries to which the task was delegated? Will the Commission estimate the number of complaints of incompleteness or inaccuracy of the prospectus in each case?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(30 June 2003)

(30 June 2003)

The Commission has not sought to estimate the proportion of prospectuses approved directly by a competent authority, nor the proportion that was approved by authorities such as exchanges or intermediaries to which the task was delegated. Under the current situation, this question is not applicable or relevant for the time being in most Member States. In fact, to the Commission's knowledge, there is only one specific regulation on this matter in Austria (auditors and banks are in charge of the review of the prospectus under a delegation from the stock exchange).

However, the Commission has carefully studied the nature of the different competent authorities for the tasks of scrutinizing and approving prospectuses in all Member States. Exchanges are in charge of the review of prospectuses in Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Austria and Sweden. However, it should be noted that, in those Member States prospectuses for offer of securities without listing are generally reviewed by a different competent authority, generally a public body.

It is important to note that in the Netherlands, the tasks of reviewing prospectuses was recently transferred from Euronext NV to the new Financial Market Authority and Ireland envisages doing a similar change.

The Commission has not estimated the number of complaints of incompleteness or inaccuracy depending on which kind of entity is in charge of the review of the prospectus. First, it does not consider that the number of complaints received by competent authorities on missing or misleading information in the context of prospectuses would permit the Commission to draw interesting conclusions. Secondly, the Commission considers that the quality of the review is not necessarily linked to the nature of the entity in charge of the review.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary

1. Civil Action number: 3:22-CV-01184-E

2. Style of Case: Carbone’s Fine Foods and Wines LLC v. The Major Food 

Group LLC, Major Intellectual LLC, Carbone Restaurant

LLC, and Carbone Café LLC

3. Nature of suit: Trademark 

4. Method of ADR used: Mediation

5. Date of ADR session: August 8, 2022

6. Outcome of ADR: Settled. The Parties executed a Settlement Agreement and

Term Sheet on the day of the mediation and are drafting

formal settlement documents.

7. TOTAL fee: $14,500.00

8. Duration of ADR: one day

9. Please list persons in attendance:

Matthew Yarbrough Trey Cox

Julian Barsotti Jeff Zalaznick

Jason Blackstone Rachael Jensen

Jennifer Mauri

Adam Korn

Matt Dunn

 

Please provide the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of counsel on the reverse side 

of this form.

10. Provider information:

s/ Christopher Nolland August 9, 2022 

Signature

1717 Main Street, Suite 5550 Telephone: (214) 653-4360

Dallas, Texas 75201-4639 Facsimile: (214) 653-4343

Case 3:22-cv-01184-E Document 25 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 726
Name and Address of Counsel:

Matthew Elliott Yarbrough

Jason Blackstone

Matt Dunn

Michelman & Robinson, LLP

100 Crescent Court, Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75201

Trey Cox

Rachael Kathleen Jensen

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 2100

Dallas, Texas 75201

Case 3:22-cv-01184-E Document 25 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 727
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, DC  20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A

               QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
               For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 1997
 
                        Commission File Number: 33-90342

                      CENTRAL ILLINOIS FINANCIAL CO., INC.     
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


        DELAWARE                                            37-1338484   
(State or other jurisdiction                   (I.R.S. Employer Identification 
of incorporation or organization)                           Number)


                100 WEST UNIVERSITY, CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS  61820
             (Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)

                                 (217)  351-6500                  
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by "X" whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
   YES   X     NO      

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock,
as of November 1, 1997:
   Central Illinois Financial Co., Inc. Common Stock                   5,140,898
Page 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<PAGE>
This amendment is being filed for the purpose of correcting the Financial Data 
Schedule (EX-27).
Page 2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<PAGE>
                                                SIGNATURES



In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused 
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly 
authorized.



CENTRAL ILLINOIS FINANCIAL CO., INC.



Date:November 18, 1997



By:    /s/ David B. White
  Executive Vice President 
  and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-230-Y 

 § 

JOSEPH JACKSON (3) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 15, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00230-Y Document 47 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 96
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
Case 3:22-cr-00332-M Document 16 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 27