alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,532,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  927,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                   545,200
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,820,429
<PP&E>                                         194,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,413,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,665,759
<BONDS>                                      8,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,167
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,206,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,413,853
<SALES>                                        339,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               377,012
<CGS>                                          385,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  459,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               284,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             362,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,704,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (675,684)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,028,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.07)
        

</TABLE>
NEVILLE LAYLOR
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO S

. 1D 15

- 2450 /1D15

- 2451

_____________________________/
Opinion filed August 22, 2016.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Frank E. Sheffield , Judge

. Jeffrey E. Lewis, General Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflic t and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee , for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

WOLF, J.
Appellant alleges the trial court erred by failing to enter a written order
declaring appe llant competent to stand trial even though the court orally declared

him competent. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.212(c)(7) requires the trial2 court to enter a written order finding a defendant competent to proce ed if that
defendant has previously been declared incompetent. See White v. State , 548 So.

2d 765, 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). We
, therefore
, agree that the trial court erred in
failing to enter such a written order declaring appellant competent after his per iod
of incompetence . W e AFFIRM appellant’s judgment and sentence but REMAND
for the trial court to enter a nunc pro tunc order declaring appellant competent. See

Hunter v. State , 174 So. 3d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

LEWIS and OSTERHAUS, J J., CON CUR.
#### STATE et al. v. THORNTON et al.

No. A-3872.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

Price Daniel, Atty.' Gen., and J. Milton Richardson, Clyde B. Kennedy and John Davenport, Asst. Attys. Gen., for relators.

No answer filed .by respondents.

PER CURIAM.

From the record before us we cannot assume that the Judge of the 44th Judicial District will grant the relief sought by the plaintiff in Cause No. 71,175-B when hearing therein is held on November 7, 1952; accordingly, the motion for leave to file petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition is overruled without prejudice to the right of relators to again file such motion if the relief sought in such, cause should be granted or if hearing therein be further postponed. -
# Official Journal C 198A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.198.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 198A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 556 July 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.198.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 198A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 556 July 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2012/C 198A/01 | Vacancy notice ECA/2012/42 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — CEAD Chamber — Directorate B: Audit and audit supervision — Financial and compliance audit | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Auditors

2012/C 198A/01

Vacancy notice ECA/2012/42 — Director (function group AD, grade 14/15) — CEAD Chamber — Directorate B: Audit and audit supervision — Financial and compliance audit

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (CS/DA) |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 169 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 187 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | (DA/DE/EN/SK) |
| 198 | (EN/FR) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(CS/DA)

160

161

169

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(DE/EN/FR)

187

189

197

(DA/DE/EN/SK)

198

(EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,108
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    133,006
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,862
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,991
<LOANS>                                        313,552<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,950
<DEPOSITS>                                     402,517
<SHORT-TERM>                                    48,104
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,303
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 523,950
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,966
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,778
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   366
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,110
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,260
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,645
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,465
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      255
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  35
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,864
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,864
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.95
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,985
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,249
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   135
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,306
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      266
<RECOVERIES>                                       137
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,432
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,432
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Includes mortgages available-for-sale and net of allowance
for loan losses of $5,432.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
    GOLD INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
    REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
    IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
       
<S>                                      <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                         2,601
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4,333,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                6,867,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          11,944,111
<PP&E>                                     6,241,810
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,926,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16,224,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4,543,063
<BONDS>                                      408,043
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   7,548,822
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,724,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16,224,084
<SALES>                                    6,058,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6,058,001
<CGS>                                      4,653,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4,653,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,321,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            97,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,002
 <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .00

        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVE MELICE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 130 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th day of March , 2023, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0488

Docket Number

2008-SW-002-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Bell Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 206-07-115, Revision C, dated February 4, 

2009. Bell ASB No. 206L-07-146, Revision B, dated March 3, 2009.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
#### In the Matter of Violet H. Weiner et al., Petitioners, against Robert C. Weaver, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 1, 1957.

*Solomon M. Lowenbaum*for petitioners.

*Nathan Heller*and *Robert Sugerman*for respondent.

Saul S. Streit, J.

The case of *Matter of Fiesta Realty Corp.*v. *McGoldrick*(284 App. Div. 551) is controlling here. The reversal by the Court of Appeals (308 N. Y. 869) was on jurisdictional grounds, without consideration of the merits. In the Court of Appeals, the landlord had pointed out that the conversion of the premises from a boarded np state to occupancy by tenants had taken place between February 1, 1947 and May 1, 1950, and it contended that therefore the premises were not subject to rent control even if the prior use was not a non-housing use. Examination of the briefs in the Appellate Division as well as in the Court of Appeals reveals that, in both courts, the Rent Administrator had admitted that the repairs were finished before May 1, 1950. The Appellate Division opinion (pp. 555-556) expressly recognized that *“*‘ additional housing accommodations created by conversion ’ on or after *644February 1, 1947, shall * * * be free from controls ”, as well as housing accommodations “ ‘ created by a change from a non-housing to a housing use.’ ” Nevertheless, the holding of that court was that the premises were subject to rent control, and the matter was remitted to the Rent Administrator to fix tire maximum rents. The Appellate Division must have been of the opinion that a change from a boarded up vacant condition to occupied apartments is not a conversion creating additional housing accommodations within the meaning of section 2 (subd. 2, par. [g], cl. [2]) of the rent statute (State Residential Rent Law), unless the change results in a greater number of housing accommodations than the number which had existed before the premises had been boarded up. In *Matter of Hutchins*(307 N. Y. 78) the property, before it was boarded up, consisted of a one-family dwelling. As the result of alterations made before May 1, 1950, 10 dwelling units were created. This increase in dwelling units may well be what the court had in mind when it said (p. 83): “It is not disputed * * * that such alterations resulted in additional housing-units As there was no greater number of housing accommodations in the case at bar, after the boarding up, than the number which existed before the boarding up, the Appellate Division holding- in the *Fiesta*case (284 App. Div. 551, supra) is binding upon this court.

The fact that, under the Federal Housing and Rent Act of 1947, accommodations which were not rented from February 1, 1945 to January 31, 1947, ivere decontrolled is of no consequence, for the section of the act which provided for such decontrol (§ 202, subd. [c], par. [3], cl. [B]; 61 U. S. Stat. 197) was omitted from the Housing and Rent Act of 1949. Such accommodations were thus recontrolled by the 1949 statute.

Motion denied and petition dismissed.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 266

Designating both September 29, 1993, and September 28, 1994, as ‘‘National

Barrier Awareness Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1993

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. WELDON, Mr.

CLYBURN, Mr. HAMBURG, Mrs. MINK, Mr. WALSH, Mr. KASICH, Mr.

MCDERMOTT, Mr. DE LA GARZA, Ms. NORTON, and Mr.

HOCHBRUECKNER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating both September 29, 1993, and September 28,

1994, as ‘‘National Barrier Awareness Day’’.

Whereas there are currently more than 43,000,000 Americans with an identifiable disability;

Whereas 80 percent of Americans will experience some form

of disability during their lives and many of these disabilities will be permanent;

Whereas persons who do not have a disability generally do

not understand the full effect of living with a disability,

and this lack of understanding fosters stereotypes and

cultural attitudes that create barriers between individuals

with disabilities and those without a disability;
2

• HJ 266 IH

Whereas the Senate and the House of Representatives enacted, and the President signed into law, the Americans

with Disabilities Act of 1990, which provides comprehensive protection from employment discrimination for individuals with disabilities, that became effective on July 26,

1992;

Whereas every American should work toward the goal of

eliminating the cultural, employment, legal, and physical

barriers that confront individuals with disabilities; and

Whereas an annual day of observance designated by the Congress and proclaimed by the President will assist the effort to eliminate the barriers that confront individuals

with disabilities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 29, 1993, and September 28, 1994, are

4 each designated as ‘‘National Barrier Awareness Day’’.

5 The President is authorized and requested to issue a proc6 lamation calling upon the people of the United States to

7 observe these days with appropriate ceremonies and activi8 ties.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 300 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 300

 Providing for the convening of the second session of the One Hundred 
                            Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            November 23 (legislative day, November 22), 1993

   Mr. Gephardt introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
                         considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the convening of the second session of the One Hundred 
                            Third Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That the second regular session of the One Hundred Third Congress shall 
begin at noon on Tuesday, January 25, 1994.
    Sec. 2. That prior to the convening of the second regular session 
of the One Hundred Third Congress on January 25, 1994, as provided in 
section 1 of this resolution, Congress shall reassemble at noon on the 
second day after its Members are notified in accordance with section 3 
of this resolution.
    Sec. 3. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                         140,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,290,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                   236,392
<INVENTORY>                                  2,344,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,067,143
<PP&E>                                       5,940,906
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,027,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,471,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,280,430
<BONDS>                                      4,570,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       484,601
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,301,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,471,377
<SALES>                                      4,634,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,634,824
<CGS>                                        3,369,853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,369,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,340,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (265,615)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (100,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (164,715)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (164,715)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK et al.,

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

 v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States et al., 

 Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Merrick Garland, in his official capacity as 

Attorney General of the United States; Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF); the United States Department of 

Justice; and ATF hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the 

Court’s Opinion & Order on Preliminary Injunction entered on September 2, 2022 [ECF No. 56].

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 113 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1457
2

DATED: November 1, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

ALEXANDER K. HAAS

Director, Federal Programs Branch

LESLEY FARBY

Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch

/s/ Martin M. Tomlinson

MARTIN M. TOMLINSON

DANIEL RIESS

TAISA M. GOODNATURE

Trial Attorneys

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

U.S. Department of Justice

1100 L Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 353-4556

Email: Martin.M.Tomlinson@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 113 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1458
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On November 1, 2022, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of 

court for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the electronic case filing system 

of the court. I hereby certify that I have served all parties electronically or by another manner 

authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2).

/s/ Martin M. Tomlinson

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 113 Filed 11/01/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1459