alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re:        Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill LynchTrust 2015-C23, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C23

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)         A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)         To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith  

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00251-L

§

KENNETH RUSSELL BARR, JR §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

KENNETH RUSSELL BARR, JR is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B)(viii) and 860, 

namely, Possession of a Controlled Substance With Intent to Distribute, said Substance Being 50 Grams or More of a 

Mixture or Substance Containing a Detectable Amount of Methamphetamine, a Schedule II Controlled Substance, Within 

1000 Feet of the Real Property Comprising Kaufman High School, a Public Secondary School. Sentence will be imposed 

in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 9th day of June, 2023.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00251-L Document 28 Filed 06/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.02






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title	:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		May 10, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James Murdakes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                               /s/ James Murdakes
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               James Murdakes
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               November 9, 2005
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0220

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM259AD

SBF100-28-050 --- 6/3/10

REPORT SE-672, I2 --- 12/1/06

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### ANDERSON et ux. v. SCOTT.

No. 2072.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Dec. 6, 1940.

*473Clayton W. Feild, Jr., of Marshall, for appellants.

Percy Woodard, of Marshall, for ap-pellee.

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

This was a suit in trespass to try title. The defendant entered a general demur--rer, general denial, plea of not guilty, etc. The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendant that plaintiffs take nothing, etc. The plaintiffs appeal by affidavit of inability to pay costs. . Neither litigant has briefed the case in .this court, and the appeal is therefore dismissed on the authority of Haynes v. Radford Groc. Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811. It is so ordered.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 326

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1995, as ‘‘National Good Teen

Day’’.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed

January 16, 1992, as ‘‘Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas both the United States Congress and the President

of the United States have proclaimed January 16, 1993,

and January 16, 1994, as ‘‘National Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in

the United States according to the 1990 census;
2

HJ 326 RDS

Whereas our Nation’s teenagers represent an important part

of our society, and the many physical and emotional

changes and character-building experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;

Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who

have problems or those who excel;

Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their

intelligence, abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the

good which is inherent in all human beings;

Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to

esteem the good as well as the potential that is within

each of them;

Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive

qualities in America’s youth; and

Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That January 16, 1995, is designated ‘‘National Good

4 Teen Day,’’ and the President is authorized and requested

5 to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers

7 of the United States and by participating in appropriate

8 ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives September 30,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-3 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Troy MillerName:

Troy MillerTitle:

PresidentDate:

March 30, 2017
Arvind Krishnamurthy

Annette Vissing-Jorgensen

Discussion: Robin Greenwood
 Deep and important paper

 Changed the way I think about...
• In equity markets, easy to believe that demand curves for 

a given stock are downward sloping:

– Idiosyncratic risk

– Lack of realistic substitutes

• In fixed income markets, however:

– Less idiosyncratic risk

– More substitutability

• As a result, most modern theories of the term structure 

inherently treat long versus short, or corporate versus 

treasury, as perfect substitutes.

• Traditional measurement difficulty: Identifying 

exogenous shifts in supply (or demand) for bonds
• If bonds of different types are imperfect substitutes...

– Shocks to the relative supply of a particular type of bond will 

affect its relative price

• Corporate versus Treasury (this paper)

• Long versus short (Greenwood and Vayanos)

• If increase supply of Treasuries relative to supply of 

corporates...

– As long as these are not treated as economic substitutes, price 

of Treasuries should go down relative to the price of 

corporates.

• Lack of substitutability is called “Convenience”

• Paper offers candidate explanations of convenience:

– Liquidity

– Safety Price of these characteristics determined by quantity
 Debt/GDP ↑ (yAAA-yG)↓

PG ↓ yG ↑ yAAA~ (yAAA-yG)↓


 If we believe that corporates and Treasuries are pretty 

good substitutes...

 Then magnitudes in paper understate the true effect of 

government supply on bond prices.

 Thought experiment in paper of increasing debt/gdp

implicitly holds general level of interest rates fixed
 QE: Fed buys LT bonds

 If we believe QE is only changing price of Treasury 

specific attributes, then not much help for lower grade 

credits

 Alternative story: changing price of duration

◦ But lots of duration in other instruments (MBS, etc) so harder 

to change the price?

 But, can still be helpful if it allows banks to issue more 

CP, which it uses to finance loans
 Paper tries to distinguish between “liquidity” and 

“safety” channel.

 Particularly challenging because they distinguish 

between “long-term safety” and “short-term safety”

 I admire the effort, but this seems difficult 

 We don’t know how effects interact

◦ Maybe investors care more about liquidity when it’s short than 

when it’s long

 Follow on work might try to measure these attributes in 

a continuous way and estimate a no arbitrage model
If moneyness varies along the curve, creates a role for 

debt management

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

0 5 10 15 20 25

Spread (bps)

Remaining Weeks to Maturity

Short-term safe = Cheap financing
Case 4:22-cr-00034-O Document 186 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 537
Case 4:22-cr-00034-O Document 186 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 538
Case 1:22-cr-00062-H-BU Document 54 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 116
Case 1:22-cr-00062-H-BU Document 54 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 117
### -90 -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 42 44



## ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/22 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
Case 3:22-cv-01802-S-BH Document 34 Filed 08/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 397
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 326

Designating January 16, 1995, as ‘‘National Good Teen Day.’’

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 22, 1994

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1995, as ‘‘National Good Teen

Day.’’

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed

January 16, 1992, as ‘‘Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas both the United States Congress and the President

of the United States have proclaimed January 16, 1993,

and January 16, 1994, as ‘‘National Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in

the United States according to the 1990 census;

Whereas our Nation’s teenagers represent an important part

of our society, and the many physical and emotional
2

HJ 326 IH

changes and character-building experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;

Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who

have problems or those who excel;

Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their

intelligence, abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the

good which is inherent in all human beings;

Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to

esteem the good as well as the potential that is within

each of them;

Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive

qualities in America’s youth; and

Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That January 16, 1995, is designated ‘‘National Good

4 Teen Day,’’ and the President is authorized and requested

5 to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers

7 of the United States and by participating in appropriate

8 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Jayme Evans 6400 NE Hwy 99, Suite G PMB 350 Vancouver, WA 98665 October 16, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Amendment to Petition for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 To Whom it May Concern, I wish to amend my Petition for Exemption dated June 10, 2015 to indicate how granting my petition would be in the public interest. Granting of my petition for exemption would be in the public interest for several reasons. Granting of my petition for exemption and allowing me to use UAVs for aerial data collection is in the public interest because it is far safer, far more economical and much easier to conduct UAV flights than manned operations. Advances in UAV technology mean new generations of sensors will be developed, allowing UAVs to conduct a growing number of inspection and monitoring operations that would put human beings at risk of severe injury or death. My UAS carries no fuel, pilot, crew or passengers. Given its size, weight, payload capacity and operating limits, granting my petition is in the public interest because – while performing some of the same operations of manned aircraft- my UAS does not pose a risk to public safety due to fire, explosion, crash or mechanical failure that often results in property damage and death in the case of manned operations. Voluntary restrictions, as well as FAA regulations will further augment safety by ensuring that operations are conducted safely and legally, in permitted airspace and sufficient distance from non-participants to ensure both safety and privacy. Granting my petition to use UAVs to conduct aerial data collection and photography is in the public interest because it is far friendlier to the environment and pumps no pollutants into the atmosphere due to the burning of fuel that would occur in a manned operation of similar scope. Granting my petition is in the public interest because use of UAVs to conduct operations previously conducted by manned aircraft also reduces congestion of the National Airspace, by virtue of its small size. If the FAA's goal is to integrate UAVs -which it defines as aircraft- into the airspace, the very act of integration itself is in the public interest. Petitioning for exemption means I am willing to adhere to FAA mandates, which upholds the public interest far more than simply flying “below the radar” of regulations governing commercial use of UAVs. Finally, using UAVs to capture aerial video and still photos for real estate listings, construction development, search and rescue, inspection, private weddings and many other applications is also inthe public interest because UAVs provide a unique visual perspective that we were unable to obtain just

a few short years ago. They will lower the cost of image acquisition, provide new avenues of artistic expression and provide economic and technological benefits for years to come.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2017

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/30 4/4 4/6 45.00 36.00 30.00 20.00 105.00 26.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 4/6 4/11 4/13 40.00 36.00 30.00 120.00 -14.00

4/13 4/18 4/20 40.00 36.00 30.00 120.00 -14.00

4/20 4/25 4/27 40.00 36.00 30.00 145.00 -39.00

4/27 5/2 5/4 40.00 36.00 30.00 20.00 115.00 11.00

5/4 5/9 5/11 40.00 36.00 30.00 110.00 -4.00

5/11 5/16 5/18 40.00 36.00 30.00 110.00 -4.00

5/18 5/23 5/25 40.00 38.00 30.00 127.00 -19.00

5/25 5/30 6/1 40.00 38.00 32.00 20.00 104.00 26.00

6/1 6/6 6/8 40.00 38.00 32.00 102.00 8.00

6/8 6/13 6/15 35.00 38.00 32.00 106.00 -1.00

6/15 6/20 6/22 35.00 38.00 32.00 130.00 -25.00

6/22 6/27 6/29 40.00 38.00 32.00 20.00 110.00 20.00

1475.00 1504.00 -29.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

35-DAY CMB 3/16 45.00 -45.00

Matures 4/20

CMB Funds: -45.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 4/6 4/10 4/17 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 4/6 4/11 4/17 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 4/6 4/12 4/17 12.00 0.00 76.76 -20.76

5-year TIPS 4/13 4/20 4/28 16.00 0.00 0.00 16.00

2-year note 4/20 4/25 5/1 26.00 0.00

2-year FRN 4/20 4/26 5/1 15.00 0.00

5-year note 4/20 4/26 5/1 34.00 0.00

7-year note 4/20 4/27 5/1 28.00 0.00 121.65 -18.65

3-year Note 5/3 5/9 5/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note 5/3 5/10 5/15 23.00 0.00

30-year Bond 5/3 5/11 5/15 15.00 0.00 49.66 12.34

10-year TIPS (r) 5/11 5/18 5/31 11.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 5/18 5/23 5/31 13.00 0.00

2-year note 5/18 5/23 5/31 26.00 0.00

5-year note 5/18 5/24 5/31 34.00 0.00

7-year note 5/18 5/25 5/31 28.00 0.00 80.76 31.24

3-year Note 6/2 6/7 6/15 24.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 6/2 6/8 6/15 20.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 6/2 6/9 6/15 12.00 0.00 28.00 28.00

2-year FRN (r) 6/22 6/27 6/30 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

30-year TIPS ® 6/15 6/22 6/30 5.00 0.00

2-year note 6/22 6/27 6/30 26.00 0.00

5-year note 6/22 6/27 6/30 34.00 0.00

7-year note 6/22 6/27 6/30 28.00 0.00 79.36 13.64

511.00 436.19 74.81

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 1
Case 3:22-cr-00333-X Document 24 Filed 03/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 31
Exhibit 35

SERVICERS ANNUAL CERTIFICATION

MECHANICS BANK

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 4.10 OF THE SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT

This Servicers Annual Certification is delivered pursuant to a sale
and servicing agreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the Sale and Servicing Agreement) by and among, California Republic Auto Receivables Trust 2015-2, California Republic Funding, LLC, Mechanics
Bank, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator, Calculation Agent and Custodian (in such capacity, the Servicer), and U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee (the Indenture Trustee). All capitalized terms used but not
defined herein shall have the meaning assigned thereto in Appendix A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

The undersigned, a
Responsible Officer of the Servicer, hereby certifies that:

1.        A review of the
activities of the Servicer and of the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to and including December 31, 2018 (the Review Period) was conducted under my
supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Review Period.

[SIGNATURE APPEARS ON
NEXT PAGE]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, in my capacity as specified below, has caused this
certificate to be executed as of the date indicated below.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 26, 2019 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Nathan J. Duda     
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Nathan J. Duda         
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer