alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 5, 2014

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

1789

2014 Roundtable

on Treasury Markets

and Debt Management

Agenda

Time Event and Presenter

8:00–8:40 a.m. Coffee and Registration

8:40–8:45 a.m. Welcome and Introduction

Seth Carpenter, Treasury

8:45–9:00 a.m.

Opening Remarks

Speaker:

Secretary Jacob Lew, Treasury

9:00–9:45 a.m.

Presentation 1: Government Debt Management at Zero Lower Bound

Presenter:

Robin Greenwood, Harvard University

Discussants:

Jan Eberly, Northwestern University

Jason Cummins, Brevan Howard

9:45–10:30 a.m.

Presentation 2: U.S. Federal Debt in the 21st Century

Presenter:

John Cochrane, University of Chicago

Discussants:

John Campbell, Harvard University

Derek Kaufman, Citadel

10:30–10:45 a.m. Coffee Break

10:45–11:05 a.m.

Remarks on Treasury Debt Management

Speaker:

Larry Summers, Harvard University

11:05–12:15 p.m.

Panel on Debt Issuance Strategy

Moderator: 

Seth Carpenter, Treasury

Panelists:

Peter Fisher, BlackRock

Brian Sack, The D.E. Shaw Group

Paul McCulley, PIMCO

12:15–1:15 p.m.

Lunch

Speaker:

Ben Bernanke, Brookings Institution
December 5, 2014

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

1789

2014 Roundtable

on Treasury Markets

and Debt Management

Time Event and Presenter

1:30–2:15 p.m.

Panel on Treasury Auction Paradigm

Moderator:

James Clark, Treasury

Panelists:

Jeremy Bulow, Stanford University

Ken Garbade, FRBNY

Christophe Rivoire, HSBC

Bryan Scarfone, Credit Agricole

2:15–2:30 p.m. Coffee Break

2:30–3:15 p.m.

Presentation 3: Bid Shading and Bidder Surplus in the U.S. Treasury Auction System

Presenter:

Jakub Kastl, Princeton University

Discussants:

Paulo Somaini, MIT

Terry Belton, JP Morgan

3:15–4:00 p.m.

Presentation 4: Intermediaries as Information Aggregators: An Application to U.S. Treasury Auctions

Presenter:

David Lucca, FRBNY

Discussants:

Haoxiang Zhu, MIT

Richard Tang, Element Capital Management

4:00–4:15 p.m. Wrap-up and Closing Remarks

Luis Viceira, Harvard Business School
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60179 Summary Calendar

JOE OSAREN, Petitioner,

v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

________________________________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(A29 398 450)

________________________________________________________________ December 24, 1996 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joe Omorodion Osaren petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing an appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying an application for asylum and withholding of deportation. There is no error relative to his argument that the BIA improperly required a direct tie between the political conditions in Nigeria and his2

individual situation. Osaren received a fair and full opportunity to develop his claim of “extreme hardship” before the Attorney General’s delegate. Ramos v. INS , 695 F.2d 181, 185-86 (5th Cir. 1983); Hernandez-Cordero , 819 F.2d at 562. Osaren’s request that we order the BIA to change his voluntary departure date is DENIED. See Faddoul v. INS , 37 F.3d 185 (5th Cir. 1994). The petition is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R.L. Smith, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | 2. | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | /s/ Gregory
  R.L. Smith 
| |                          
| | Gregory R.L.
  Smith     
| | Chief
  Financial Officer
| | August 9,
  2007         

---
## Public Hearing Passenger Vessel Accessibility Guidelines NPRM July 10, 2013
• Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to establish guidelines for accessible passenger vessels • Comment period closes on Sept. 23, 2013

## Rulemaking History
• 1998 - established the Passenger Vessels AccessAdvisory Committee • 2004 - published draft guidelines for public comment • 2006 - published revised draft guidelines for public comment

## Rulemaking History
• 2008 - made available further revised draft guidelines to collect cost and other impact information • 2009 - 2012 - conducted the regulatory assessment and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis • 2013 - published the proposed guidelines for public comment

## Hearing Procedures
• Registered speakers may speak for 5 minutes • After all registered speakers have presented others may testify • Notify staff at the registration desk if you want to testify and have not pre-registered • Please turn off or silence your cell phone

## Hearing Procedures
• Transcriptwill be kept and will be entered into the docket • Written remarks or PowerPoint shows should be given to staff at the registration desk • Refrain from reacting publicly to witness presentations or Board member statements
TIGTA FY 2022 President's 

Budget Request: Summary of Capital Investments

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Percent A

Capital Investments Total 2.995 - 8.986 - 11.981 3.024 - 9.073 - 12.097 3.174 - 9.521 - 12.695 5% 

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 0.836 - 2.509 - 3.345 0.804 - 2.411 - 3.215 0.854 - 2.561 - 3.415 6% 

Standard/Non-Standard IT sub-total 2.159 - 6.476 - 8.635 2.221 - 6.662 - 8.883 2.320 - 6.960 - 9.280 5% 

IT Total 2.995 - 8.986 - 11.981 3.024 - 9.073 - 12.097 3.174 - 9.521 - 12.695 5% 

non-IT Total

TIGTA Major IT InvestmentsTIGTA non-Major IT InvestmentsApplications and Collaboration 0.836 - 2.509 - 3.345 0.804 - 2.411 - 3.215 0.854 - 2.561 - 3.415 6% 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and 

Expenses

0.836 - 2.509 - 3.345 0.804 - 2.411 - 3.215 0.854 - 2.561 - 3.415 6% 

TIGTA Standard/Non-Standard IT InvestmentsCybersecurity 0.467 - 1.400 - 1.867 0.462 - 1.386 - 1.848 0.466 - 1.398 - 1.864 1% 

015-05-0101 Salaries and Expenses 0.467 - 1.400 - 1.867 0.462 - 1.386 - 1.848 0.466 - 1.398 - 1.864 1% 

Enterprise Architecture & Management 0.198 - 0.595 - 0.793 0.235 - 0.706 - 0.941 0.278 - 0.835 - 1.113 18% 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and 

Expenses

0.198 - 0.595 - 0.793 0.235 - 0.706 - 0.941 0.278 - 0.835 - 1.113 18% 

Infrastructure End User Systems and Support

0.617 - 1.850 - 2.467 0.625 - 1.875 - 2.500 0.668 - 2.005 - 2.673 7% 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and 

Expenses

0.617 - 1.850 - 2.467 0.625 - 1.875 - 2.500 0.668 - 2.005 - 2.673 7% 

Infrastructure Mainframe and Servers Services and Support

0.564 - 1.691 - 2.255 0.571 - 1.713 - 2.284 0.576 - 1.729 - 2.305 1% 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and 

Expenses

0.564 - 1.691 - 2.255 0.571 - 1.713 - 2.284 0.576 - 1.729 - 2.305 1% 

Infrastructure Telecommunications 0.314 - 0.941 - 1.255 0.327 - 0.982 - 1.309 0.331 - 0.993 - 1.324 1% 

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and 

Expenses

0.314 - 0.941 - 1.255 0.327 - 0.982 - 1.309 0.331 - 0.993 - 1.324 1% 

TIGTA non-IT Investments

FY 2020 Actual Obligations FY 2021 Estimated Obligations FY 2022 Estimated Obligations 

 O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

Change 

from CY 

to BY 

TIGTA FY2022 President's Budget Request Summary of Capital Investments Page 1 of 1
LTNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-079-01-H

DEVIN JOE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bX1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

t,

Dated October L\ , 2022.

JAMES SLE HENDRIX

UNITED TATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00079-H-BQ Document 34 Filed 10/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 73
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE02896

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         480,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,690,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    494,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,677,681
<PP&E>                                         258,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,941,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,986,863
<BONDS>                                        467,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,425
<OTHER-SE>                                     427,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,941,604
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,574,289
<CGS>                                        1,727,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               602,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    84,119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,254
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02



</TABLE>
Agenda – November 2014 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – October 30-31, 2014 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, October 27, 2014 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov and NY.QTR@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not scheduled to meet with Treasury 

officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

 Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 Low/High 

 October-December 2014 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 January-March 2015 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 FY 2015 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

 FY 2016 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 FY 2017 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

 FY 2015 / 

 FY 2016 / 

 FY 2017 / 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2015 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2015 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q % Chg) CY2016 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

 3-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 10-year note (November) / 

 10-year note reopening (December/January) / / - / 

 30-year bond (November) / 

 30-year bond reopening (December/January) / / 

 2-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 5-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 7-year note (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 10-year TIPS reopening (November) 

 5-year TIPS reopening (December) 

 10-year TIPS (January) 

 2-year FRN reopening (November/December) 

 2-year FRN (January) 

 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates 

 52-week bill size (November/December/January) / / / / - / / 

 Total change in bills outstanding 11/14-1/15 / 

 Total change in bills outstanding FY 2015 / 

 CMB issuance November ‘14 – January ‘15 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics 

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2015 and FY2016. Do you believe the current 

financing schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s financing needs though the end of FY2015? 

2. Please describe the market dynamics in the front-end of the yield curve. Comment on the level of demand for 

high-quality short-duration securities, as well as the overall supply of these products. Given your outlook on 

supply and demand, what considerations should be made to ensure the ongoing liquidity of the T-bill market? 

3. Treasury has held ten FRN auctions since introducing this new product in January. Please comment on how both 

the primary and secondary markets for this new product have developed. Do you have any suggestions regarding 

FRN issuance in 2015 - auction sizes or maturity points? Please elaborate.
#### Eddie MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 21376.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1941.

Walter E. Gates, of San Saba, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of Eddie Miller v. State, No. 21377, 148 S.W.2d 426, in which the State has filed a motion for a rehearing setting forth therein the same grounds that are presented in the motion for a rehearing in this case.

For the same reasons appearing in the opinion granting the State’s motion for rehearing in cause No. 21377, the State’s motion for rehearing in this case is granted, the original opinion is withdrawn, and *429the judgment of the trial court is now affirmed.

PER CURIAM..

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 57

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
providing that, except in cases of national emergency, expenditures of 
the United States Government shall not exceed its revenues, nor exceed 
     20 percent of the gross national product, in any fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Neal of North Carolina introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
providing that, except in cases of national emergency, expenditures of 
the United States Government shall not exceed its revenues, nor exceed 
     20 percent of the gross national product, in any fiscal year.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be valid only if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of the final passage of this joint 
resolution:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Except in cases of national emergency, as determined 
by a three-fifths vote by each House of the Congress, expenditures of 
the United States Government shall not exceed its revenues, nor exceed 
20 percent of the gross national product, in any fiscal year.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article by appropriate legislation.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James Murdakes, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Image Sensing Systems, Inc.;


2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 7, 2006



/s/ James MurdakesName: James MurdakesTitle: Chief Executive Officer


---
Case 3:22-cv-03266-C-BK Document 15 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission of the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as theChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: October 28,  2010 | By:    | /s/ Dan T. Bessey       |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Dan T. Bessey,          |
|                         |   | Vice President and      |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qand shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
#### Lewis C. AMMERMAN, Movant, v. Bruce HAYS et al., Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 1, 1952.

John D. W. Collins, Whitesburg, for movant.

French Hawk, Whitesburg, for opposed.

PER CURIAM.-

Motion for appeal from judgment denying movant’s claim for $497.58, and declining to reinstate attachment.

Motion for appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
Presented to: By: Date: **Federal Av**  **iation Ad**  **ministration** 

# ECi **Cylinder Airworthiness**  **Directive Introduction** 

NTSB Fran Cox, FAA , Rotorcraft Directorate June 9, 2015**Federal Av** **iation Ad**  **ministration** 

# NTSB / FAA Meeting

• **Thank yo**  **u; dialogue**  **with the NTSB is**  **overdue.** Delayed by defining where ex parte begins. 

### • **Opportunity t** **o resolve differences between NTSB**  **recommendations & FAA**  **compliance.** • **Hopefully ,**  **we find agreement...** ... or at least an understanding of our decisions. 

### • **Post -**  **meeting: F**  **ederal docket upload of meeting presentations**  **and results.**  NTSB meeting June 9, 2015 For Official Use Only 2**Federal Av** **iation Ad**  **ministration** 

# NTSB / FAA Meeting **FAA’s presentation**  **topics:** • **Background** Timeline and fundamental information. 

### • **Comparison of recommendations**  ECi / NTSB / FAA recommendations. 

### • **FAA Challenge**  **Team findings** Risk analysis and resulting compliance plan. 

### • **Going forward**  Identify areas of NTSB and FAA agreement. NTSB meeting June 9, 2015 For Official Use Only 3