alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 101/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 101 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5826 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 101

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5826 March 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2015/C 101/01 | Position (EU) No 3/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bagsAdopted by the Council on 2 March 2015 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 101/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 3/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2015/C 101/01

Position (EU) No 3/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bagsAdopted by the Council on 2 March 2015 (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 101/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 3/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 110 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.110
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  To authorize the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 
to conduct appropriate programs and activities to acknowledge the status 
of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ``World Capital of 
Aerobatics'', and for other purposes.

Whereas the International Aerobatic Club, which was founded on February 
  6, 1970, held its first championships in August 1970 in the county of 
  Fond du Lac, Wisconsin;
Whereas in 1992 the International Aerobatic Club had 5,342 members 
  throughout the world, representatives of which gathered in Fond du Lac 
  to compete in the 23d Annual Aerobatic Championships during the period 
  of August 9-14, 1992;
Whereas in 1992 the Experimental Aircraft Association and the Board of 
  Directors of the International Aerobatic Club named Fond du Lac as the 
  ``World Capital of Aerobatics'';
Whereas participants and spectators drawn to the aerobatic championships 
  in Fond du Lac stimulate the economic well-being of the community and 
  provide a spectator event of international significance; and
Whereas Congress declares that the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, is 
  the ``World Capital of Aerobatics'': Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Administrator of the 
Federal Aviation Administration may conduct appropriate programs and 
activities at the Fond du Lac County Airport to acknowledge the status 
of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ``World Capital of 
Aerobatics'', and that the airport may display signs notifying the 
public of such status.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 353 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 353

    Designating July 16 through July 24, 1994, as ``National Apollo 
                       Anniversary Observance''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1994

   Mr. Mineta (for himself, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Klein, Mrs. 
 Byrne, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Bacchus of 
Florida, Mr. Valentine, Mr. Kopetski, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Baker 
 of California, Ms. Danner, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Pickett, Mr. Tanner, Mrs. 
 Meek, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Packard, Mr. Bevill, Ms. Brown of Florida, 
   Mr. Filner, Mr. McCloskey, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Borski, Mr. Frost, Mr. 
Andrews of Texas, Mr. Mollohan, Mr. Fingerhut, Mr. Pete Geren of Texas, 
and Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Designating July 16 through July 24, 1994, as ``National Apollo 
                       Anniversary Observance''.

Whereas President Kennedy in 1961 called upon the United States to face the 
        challenge of those extraordinary times by sending a mission to the Moon;
Whereas the United States Government, the National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration, and the American people committed great resources, time, 
        and human labor within one decade to span the 238,700 miles between the 
        Earth and the Moon;
Whereas the United States rose to the challenge and formulated the Apollo 
        missions culminating in the liftoff on July 16, 1969, of the Apollo 11 
        Mission to the Moon;
Whereas 25 years ago astronaut Neil Armstrong, with the help of Colonel Edwin 
        (Buzz) Aldrin, Jr. (USAF) and Lieutenant Colonel Michael Collins (USAF), 
        took that first significant step and became the first human to set foot 
        on the surface of another world;
Whereas that small step furthered the development of space technology for the 
        lasting benefit of all mankind; and
Whereas such an event united the world and our many cultures for a brief moment 
        under the flag of peaceful exploration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That July 16, 1994, through 
July 24, 1994, is designated as ``National Apollo Anniversary 
Observance'', and the President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe such 
period with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cr-00296-X Document 12 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 17
Case 3:22-cr-00296-X Document 12 Filed 08/02/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 18
Case 3:22-cr-00296-X Document 12 Filed 08/02/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 19
Case 3:22-cr-00296-X Document 12 Filed 08/02/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 20
Case 3:22-cr-00296-X Document 12 Filed 08/02/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 21
#### PRESTON v. STATE.

No. 21793.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1941.

Dwight Baldwin, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of whiskey on Sunday, Art. 666 — 25, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, a fine of one hundred dollars.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The information is sufficient to charge the offense. Hughes v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 175, 114 S.W.2d 566.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40820 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

EVERARDO VILLARREAL

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19

- CR

- 392

- 1

Before ELROD, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Everardo Villarreal

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villarreal has filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein , as well

as Villarreal ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40820 Document: 00515436057 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2020No. 19

- 40820

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, c ounsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40820 Document: 00515436057 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2020
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                          
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|West Virginia Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
#### Berkshire Nursing Center, Inc., Respondent, v Len Realty Co., Appellant.

In an action to recover capital cost expenditures pursuant to a lease, the defendant appeals from *476so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), dated November 28, 1988, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties entered into a lease which allegedly obligated the defendant landlord to reimburse the plaintiff tenant for required "capital costs” the plaintiff made. Contending that the plaintiff failed to set forth any facts demonstrating that its expenditures were required "capital costs”, the defendant argues it should have been granted summary judgment. We disagree.

The plaintiff submitted to the defendant a detailed listing specifying the nature of each expense, the amount, the date incurred, the vendor, and the corresponding check number. Considering the ambiguous meaning of the term "capital costs”, the expenditures alleged appear by their descriptions to be sufficiently necessary to raise a question as to whether they were the type for which the plaintiff was entitled to be reimbursed *(see generally, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs.,*46 NY2d 1065).

While we affirm the order insofar as appealed from, we note that so much of the court’s decision as indicated that a prior action had collateral estoppel effect was erroneous. Because no order or final judgment was ever entered in the prior action, the doctrine of collateral estoppel is inapplicable *(see, Dunleavy v First Am. Tit. Ins. Co.,*117 AD2d 952; *Ott v Barash,*109 AD2d 254; *Peterson v Forkey,*50 AD2d 774). We also reject the defendant’s claim that the plaintiff improperly split its cause of action *(see, Matter of Reilly v Reid,*45 NY2d 24, 27-31; *Lewyt-Patchogue Co. v Cantor,*82 AD2d 911; *Brown v Lockwood,*76 AD2d 721, 735-738; *Stoner v Culligan, Inc.,*32 AD2d 170).

In light of these findings, we find it unnecessary to address the plaintiffs other contention. Lawrence, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John L. Glover, Also Known as Stacy L. Harris, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mo-gel, J., at suppression hearing, plea and sentence), rendered August 24, 1989, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and sentencing him to a prison term of from *VA*to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The suppression court found that there was probable cause to arrest defendant based upon the arresting officer’s observation of a drug transaction. Upon our review of the record, we accept the factual findings of the hearing court since, contrary to defendant’s argument, the officer’s testimony was not in*341credible as a matter of law *(People v Vasquez,*166 AD2d 194). Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Asch, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

186)IV-C-153 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:01 AM Sheet 186 of 232 
F _ _ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY _ , 

JAN 2 4 1989 

^%&#*** 

^^^ : 

Mr. Gregory J. Dana ^ .,,'..? >• oO^ 1 " 

Vice President and Technical Director CflN\,--- >M 

Automobile Importers of America, Incorporated

 : ~' 

1725 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1002 

Arlington, VA 22202 

Dear Mr. Danat 

I am writing in response to your December 29, 1988 letter 

reiterating AIA's position concerning the schedule for the 

Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNPRM) for 

refueling controls. In particular you expressed concerns that 

scheduling the public hearing two weeks after publication of 

the SNPRM would not allow sufficient time for AIA members to 

prepare for the hearing. 

Please be assured that as always, EPA is committed, to 

providing adecruate time for public participation in the SNPPK 

review process. He continue to believe that our past actions 

of publicly releasing the key information upon which the SNPRM 

is based, should allow manufacturers to start preparing their 

comments on the SNPRM. However, we also recognize your 

continuing concern over this matter and will fully consider 

your comments before setting a hearing date for the SNPRM. 

Thank you for your comments on this subject. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

CCt Dooket A-87-11 ••'.,;:.•; '-- .••;'&•:. ' 

Docket A-85-21 "
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 74/2004

of 8 June 2004         

amending Annex XI (Telecommunication services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5cn (Commission Decision 2003/548/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Recommendation 2003/558/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

S. GILLESPIE            

----

(1)OJ L 130, 29.4.2004, p. 3.

(2)OJ L 189, 29.7.2003, p. 49.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GFSB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  we,  Richard C.
Kauzlaric,  President,  and Jerry R. Spurlin, Chief Financial Officer,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/Richard C. Kauzlaric                       /s/Jerry R. Spurlin
-------------------------------               ---------------------------------
Richard C. Kauzlaric                          Jerry R. Spurlin
President                                     Chief Financial Officer




February 14, 2005


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Dec ember 13 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk Dec ember 13 , 2019

160 466 ( 39 )

TAYLOR MADISON, a Minor, by her Next

Friend, LATRESE DICKENS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 160 466

v COA: 3 42868

Wayne CC: 17

- 011570

- AV

AAA OF MICHIGAN

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion s of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filings its reply and to exceed the page limitation are GRANTED. The 16

- page reply

submitted on Dec ember 11 , 2019, is accepted for filing

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          46,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  312,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000
<INVENTORY>                                    211,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,194,123
<PP&E>                                         390,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,873,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,833,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       943,980
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,873,735
<SALES>                                     24,549,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,549,498
<CGS>                                       22,182,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,182,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             178,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,450,042)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,450,042)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,450,042)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>