alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

OPPTS-RCS-OMB-7f (revised 09/23/2009) If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the contact:

Name: eMail: Phone: 

### Title of Action:



## Documentation of Changes Made During OMB Review Under Executive Order 12866

Docket #: EPA-HQ- FRL#: RIN: 2070-

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). According to section 6(a)(3)(E) of the Executive Order, whenever the Agency makes publicly available a regulatory action that was reviewed under Executive Order 12866, the Agency is also required to:

(1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the Executive Order, i.e., the text of the draft regulatory action and, if applicable, an assessment of the potential costs and benefits; as well as additional information required for those actions that are determined to be economically significant under section 3(f) of the Executive Order (see section 6(a)(3)(B) & (C)); (2) Identify for the public any substantive changes between the draft submitted to OMB and the action that was subsequently issued, using a method that is complete, clear and simple; and (3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA/OMB. 

### For this regulatory action, were substantive changes made to the regulatory action reviewed under Executive Order 12866? [Please check the appropriate answer.]

Yes. [The information identified in items 1-3 below is included in the docket, as applicble.] No. [Only the information identified in item 1 below is included in the docket.]



### Accordingly, the Agency has included the following information in the public docket for this regulatory action: [Please check the appropriate box(s).]

(2) Documentation of any substantive changes that were made to the draft regulatory text that was submitted to OIRA/OMB for review, when compared with what subsequently published, using one of the following methods (select one): (1) A copy of the information that was provided to OIRA for review under the Executive Order.

(3) Documentation of those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OMB , if any, are identified in the document using one of the following methods (select one): (a) A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, with redline and strikeout to show all the substantive changes that were made. (b) A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made, with page and paragraph references to the draft regulatory action that was submitted.

(a) Through attributions to OMB in the redline and strikeout version or other document identifying the changes made at OMB's recommendation. (c) Other (please describe):

(b) Other (please describe):
# Official Journal C 202I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 202I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 202I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 202 I/01 | Council conclusions on shaping Europe’s digital future | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 202 I/01

Council conclusions on shaping Europe’s digital future

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 263

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

for a runoff election if no candidate receives more than 50 percent

of the popular vote nationally.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide for a runoff election if no candidate

receives more than 50 percent of the popular vote nationally.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
2

•HJ 263 IH

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission

3 for ratification:

4 ‘‘ARTICLE—

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Chief Justice of the United States

6 shall declare that a runoff election is necessary if no can7 didates for President and Vice President of the United

8 States receive more than 50 percent of the popular vote

9 cast for President and Vice President nationally at the

10 general election.

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. If the Chief Justice of the United States

12 declares that a runoff election is necessary, the electors

13 of President and Vice President of the United States shall

14 be appointed based on the popular vote cast at a runoff

15 election in each State and the District constituting the

16 seat of Government of the United States.

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. The runoff election shall be between the

18 candidates who receive the greatest number of popular

19 votes cast for President and Vice President nationally at

20 the general election and the candidates who receive the

21 second greatest number of popular votes cast for President

22 and Vice President nationally at the general election and

23 shall be held 14 calendar days after the date on which

24 the general election is held.
3

•HJ 263 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 4. In both a general election and a runoff

2 election, each vote shall be cast for two persons who have

3 consented to the joining of their names on the ballot as

4 candidates for President and Vice President. No candidate

5 shall consent to the joining of his or her name with the

6 name of more than one other person.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

COREY DESHAUN BELL,

Plaintiff,

VS.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-1190-G-BH

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the

Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions

of the court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly,

the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

September 8, 2023.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-01190-G-BH Document 25 Filed 09/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 994
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. ) DOCKET OST

- 20 10

- 0233 ) for renewal of exemption authority ) (U.S.- Ecuador ) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION
Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: John R. Mietus, Jr. L aw Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817

- 7500 (202) 747

- 5212 john@mietuslaw.com
Counsel for CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC

.
NOTICE: Any person may support or oppose this application by filing an answer and serving a copy of the answer on counsel for Centurion and upon persons served wit h this application no later than June 26, 2014.
June 11, 2014BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. ) DOCKET OST

- 2010

- 0233 ) June 11, 2014 for renewal of exemption authority ) (U.S.- Ecuador ) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF CENTURION AIR CARGO, INC. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(c), Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. (“Centurion”) respectfully requests renewal of the above

- captioned exemption, granted by Notice of Action Taken dated August 15, 2012, for a n additional, two

- year period. The Notice permits Centurion to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail : (1) from a point or points in the United States, via intermediate points, to a point or points in Ecuador and beyond, and (2) from Ecuador to any point or points; the Notice also integrates this exemption authority with Centurion’s existing authority. Centurion intends to invoke the automatic extension provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 558(c) and Part 377 of the Department's Special Regulations ; this application is timely pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 377.10

. In support of this application, Centurion states as follows:- 2 - Centurion Renewal Application
1. Centurion first obtained U.S.

- Ecuador authority i n 2002. The Department has consistently found that Centurion is operationally and financially qualified to conduct U.S.

- Ecuador operations and that grant of the authority i s consistent with the aviation agreement between the United States and Ecuador

. 2. Centurion submits that renewal of the authority remains in the public interest and consistent with U.S.

- Ecuador relations. Centurion ’s frequent operations between the U.S. and Ecuador have been well

- received by the shipping public. Information officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the Department’s Procedural Regulations supports Centurion’s continued fitness for U.S.

- Ecuador service. Renewal will not constitute a major regulatory action under Part 313 of the Department’s regulations and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. Finally, the authority to be renewed is contemplated by the 2010 Protocol to the U.S.

- Ecuador Air Transport Agreement , which grants U.S. all

- cargo carriers broad rights.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1169/2006

of 31 July 2006         

fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The corrective amount referred to in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 which is applicable to export refunds fixed in advance except for malt shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 August 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 31 July 2006 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the financial statements for Independence Tax Credit Plus
L.P. IV and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000940329
<NAME>  Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. IV
<MULTIPLIER>                    1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          4,173,492
<SECURITIES>                    11,600,000
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                412,037
<PP&E>                          67,048,418
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,761,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  82,098,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           12,270,361
<BONDS>                         30,174,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      39,653,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    82,098,683
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                954,299
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,013,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              261,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (453,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 (132,520)
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (448,801)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (9.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 75

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 20 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Committee discharged

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1994, as ‘‘National Good Teen

Day’’.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed

January 16, 1992, as ‘‘Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in

the United States according to the 1990 Census;

Whereas our Nation’s teenagers represent an important part

of our society, and the many physical and emotional

changes and character-building experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;

Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who

have problems or those who excel;

Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their

intelligence, abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the

good which is inherent in all human beings;
2

HJ 75 CDS

Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to

esteem the good as well as the potential that is within

each of them;

Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive

qualities in America’s youth; and

Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That January 16, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Good

4 Teen Day’’, and the President is authorized and requested

5 to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers

7 of the United States and by participating in appropriate

8 ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 293

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the printing of the book entitled ‘‘History

of the United States House of Representatives’’.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That a revised edition of the book entitled

3 ‘‘History of the United States House of Representatives’’,

4 prepared under the supervision of the Committee on

5 House Administration of the House of Representatives,

6 shall be printed as a House document.

7 SEC. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall

8 be printed the lesser of—
2

HCON 293 RDS

1 (1) 5,000 casebound copies of the document, of

2 which 4,750 copies shall be for the use of the Com3 mittee on House Administration of the House of

4 Representatives and 250 copies shall be for the use

5 of the Senate; or

6 (2) such number of casebound copies of the

7 document as does not exceed a total production and

8 printing cost of $75,000, with such copies to be allo9 cated in the same proportion as described in para10 graph (1).

11 SEC. 3. Of the copies of the document for the use

12 of the Committee on House Administration of the House

13 of Representatives under section 2(1), at the request of

14 a Member of the House of Representatives, the Member

15 shall be entitled to receive at least 5 copies. The Commit16 tee shall notify each Member of the entitlement under the

17 preceding sentence. As used in this section, the term

18 ‘‘Member of the House of Representatives’’ means a Rep19 resentative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner

20 to, the Congress.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 31, 2015 

CONTACT: Rob Friedlander, Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING JULY 31, 2015

WASHINGTON – Secretary Lew today convened a meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight 

Council (Council) in an executive session at the Treasury Department. 

During the meeting, the Council heard updates from the Treasury Department regarding recent 

international and domestic market developments. 

The Council also discussed its ongoing assessment of potential risks to U.S. financial stability 

arising from asset management products and activities. Staff updated the Council on its ongoing 

work, including its review of the public comments submitted in response to the Council’s notice 

seeking comment on asset management products and activities. 

The Council also followed up on the interagency staff report issued on July 13, 2015, analyzing 

the significant volatility in the U.S. Treasury market on October 15, 2014. The Council 

discussed potential next steps regarding the recommendations made in the report, as well as 

efforts pursuant to the recommendations in the Council’s 2015 annual report regarding potential 

emerging threats related to changes in financial market structure. 

In addition, the Council discussed its annual reviews of two nonbank financial companies 

designated in July 2013, American International Group (AIG) and General Electric Capital 

Corporation (GECC). As part of the annual review process, each company had been invited to 

meet with staff to discuss the review and to submit information regarding any change that the 

company deemed relevant to the threat the company could pose to financial stability. With 

respect to AIG, the company did not contest its designation in this annual review. Following a 

discussion of recent developments at AIG, the Council did not rescind the company’s 

designation. 
With respect to GECC, the Council acknowledged the company’s April 2015 announcement 

regarding an anticipated restructuring of its business. GECC did not contest its designation in 

this annual review. Following a discussion of recent developments at GECC, the Council did not 

rescind the company’s designation.

The Council noted that, as a general matter, if it determines in an annual review that a company 

has addressed the key factors in the Council’s basis for its designation, the Council would 

rescind the designation.

Finally, the Council also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on May 19. 

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved meeting 

minutes is available at http://www.fsoc.gov. 

###
Case 1:22-cr-00050-H-BU Document 102 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 217
Case 3:22-cr-00181-M Document 34 Filed 03/16/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 106
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          2,824
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            862
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    54,326
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         55,238
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           56,008
<LOANS>                                       115,070
<ALLOWANCE>                                       579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                181,891
<DEPOSITS>                                     79,923
<SHORT-TERM>                                   87,163
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             1,522
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           94
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                181,891
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 2,409
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 935
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   85
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                3,429
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                870
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,258
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,171
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      70
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   509
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        509
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      349
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.69
<LOANS-NON>                                       616
<LOANS-PAST>                                       64
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  151
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 2,508
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  512
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       3
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 579
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              579
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>