alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BISHOP DAVID PAUL MOTEN, 

 Plaintiff,

§

§

§

§

vs. § Case No. 3:22-cv-00991-K

§

DEF JAM RECORDINGS, UMG 

RECORDINGS, INC.,

YE f/k/a KANYE WEST, and 

G.O.O.D. MUSIC

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Plaintiff BISHOP DAVID PAUL MOTEN (“BISHOP MOTEN” or

“Plaintiff”) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and hereby dismisses 

all causes of action in the complaint against Defendants WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling the 

same. In support thereof, Plaintiff respectfully avers unto the Court as follows:

Defendants Def Jam Recordings, UMG Recordings, Inc., YE f/k/a Kanye West and Getting 

Out Our Dreams, Inc. have not been served in the instant action and have filed neither an answer to 

the complaint nor a motion for summary judgment as to these claims. Consequently, Dismissal under 

Rule 41(a)(1) is therefore appropriate. 

DATED: May 18, 2022.

Respectfully submitted,

Case 3:22-cv-00991-K Document 5 Filed 05/18/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 33
2

SMITH & SMITH LAW GROUP, PLLC

2828 Market Loop, Suite 100

Southlake, Texas 76092

By: /s/ Brandon Smith

Brandon Smith

SBN:24075919

bsmith@smithdallaslaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 3:22-cv-00991-K Document 5 Filed 05/18/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 34
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER RAMIREZ, BY AND 

THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND,

OLIMPIA RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff,

V.

CECILE YOUNG, IN HER OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS THE EXECUTIVE 

COMMISSIONER, TEXAS HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION,

Defendant.

No. 4:22-cv-0733-P

ORDER

After a hearing, the United States Magistrate Judge made findings, 

conclusions, and a recommendation (FCRs) regarding the Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and Preliminary 

Injunction. ECF No. 3, 5. The FCRs concern the TRO; the preliminary 

injunction remains pending before the Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 5, 6. 

Defendant objected to the FCRs. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff responded to the 

Objections. ECF No. 13.

The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the 

Magistrate Judge’s FCRs to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the FCRs that are not the subject of a timely 

objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous 

or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th 

Cir. 1989).

Having reviewed the Complaint, Motion, FCRs, Objections, 

Responses to the Objections, arguments of counsel, and relevant caselaw 

including Harrison v. Young, No. 19-10874, 2022 WL 3906582 (5th Cir. 

Aug. 31, 2022), the Court GRANTS Defendant’s objection to the 

Magistrate Judge’s finding that Plaintiff showed a substantial 

Case 4:22-cv-00733-P Document 17 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 156
2

likelihood that he will prevail on the merits. No. 19-10874, 2022 WL 

3906582, at *5–6 (5th Cir. Aug. 31, 2022). Without reaching the other 

Objections, the Court therefore DENIES the Motion to the extent that 

it seeks a TRO. 

That portion of the Motion seeking a preliminary injunction remains 

pending before Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton, and all papers filed 

hereafter regarding the preliminary injunction request shall include the 

following notation under the case number: “(Relates to Motion Referred 

to Magistrate Judge Cureton).”

SO ORDERED on this 2nd day of September 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00733-P Document 17 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 157
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CLINICOR,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND FOR THE 3-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000, AND THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         530,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,652,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                    415,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,578,441
<PP&E>                                       1,931,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                 942,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,567,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,221,734
<BONDS>                                         59,174<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,603,000
<COMMON>                                         4,170
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,320,986)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,567,092
<SALES>                                      1,822,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,822,005
<CGS>                                        1,112,384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,475,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (44,972)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (698,022)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (698,022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (698,022)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
<FN>
<F1>Consists of capitalized lease obligations, excluding current portions.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 243A/24 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 243A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5824 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 243A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5824 July 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 243A/01 | Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/116 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2015/C 243A/01

Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/116

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.16




DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT LETTER


On August 2, 2010, an original offer letter was provided to Thomas Constantine and subsequently amended. The summary below represents the understanding of the parties as of July 1, 2014 with respect to employment of Mr. Constantine:


		
	•
	Base compensation: $220,000 per year, reviewed annually;




		
	•
	Annual bonus target of 30% of annual salary payable in any combination of cash or restricted stock units of common stock of BofI Holding, Inc. (“RSUs”) with performance evaluated and bonus paid semi-annually. The amount of the bonus may be reduced to zero or increased above 30% for outstanding performance at any time based solely upon the judgment and discretion of the CEO or the Board.  The RSUs granted for bonus will vest over future employment service, generally within three years, and the mix of cash and RSUs may change at the discretion of the CEO or the Board.  




		
	•
	Severance, in the event employment is terminated by the Bank or the Bank’s successor other than for cause (as defined below), the Bank shall pay the then current bi-weekly salary for 12 months from the date of termination and any outstanding unvested equity incentive awards shall become immediately and fully vested, subject to signature of a waiver of any and all claims of any kind or nature against the Bank and its Board. 




For purposes of this severance payment, a termination for cause is a termination by reason of:  


		
	i.
	material failure to perform or habitual neglect of material duties and which, for any such failure that is remediable, or can be cured going forward, is not remedied or cured within a reasonable period of time after notification of such failure;


		
	ii.
	conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction of a felony involving acts of fraud, embezzlement, dishonesty or moral turpitude which materially adversely affects Bank's reputation in the community or which evidences lack of moral fitness;


		
	iii.
	commitment of an act which causes termination of coverage under Bank's Banker Blanket Bond as to you personally, as distinguished from termination of coverage as to the Bank as a whole or as to other officers of the Bank;


		
	iv.
	if Bank is closed or taken over by any of the bank regulatory authorities having jurisdiction over Bank's activities as a result of actions taken by you; or 


		
	v.
	if any bank regulatory authority should successfully exercise its cease and desist power to remove you from office; and 


		
	vi.
	the termination for cause reasons set forth in 12 C.F.R. § 563.39(b)(l).
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 21

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 limiting the number of consecutive terms members of the United States 
             Senate and House of Representatives may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Dornan of California introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 limiting the number of consecutive terms members of the United States 
             Senate and House of Representatives may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person may serve any term or portion thereof as a 
member of the United States House of Representatives if such person has 
served as a member of the House for each of the six terms, or a portion 
of any such term, immediately preceding such term.
    ``Section 2. No person may serve any term or portion thereof as a 
member of the United States Senate if such person has served as a 
member of the Senate for each of the two terms, or a portion of any 
such term, immediately preceding such term.
    ``Section 3. For purposes of this article, service as a member in 
the United States Senate or House of Representatives in any term which 
commenced before the ratification of this article may not be included 
in determining the number of terms served.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### PARKER v. STATE.

No. 21390.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 29, 1941.

Walter E. Gates, of San Saba, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in dry area, punishment assessed being a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars.

The record contains no bills of exception. The facts have been reviewed and are sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 279

Providing for the appointment of Manuel Luis Ib ́an ̃ez as a citizen regent

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 1993

Mr. MINETA (for himself, Mr. NATCHER, and Mr. MCDADE) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House

Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Manuel Luis Ib ́an ̃ez as

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the resignation of Anne Legendre Armstrong of
2

•HJ 279 IH

1 Texas, is filled by the appointment of Manuel Luis Ib ́an ̃ez

2 of Texas. The appointment is for a term of 6 years and

3 shall take effect on the day after the effective date of the

4 resignation of Anne Legendre Armstrong.

Æ
Case 4:22-mj-00344-BJ Document 1 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1
Case 4:22-mj-00344-BJ Document 1 Filed 05/11/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2
Case 4:22-mj-00344-BJ Document 1 Filed 05/11/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3
Case 4:22-mj-00344-BJ Document 1 Filed 05/11/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 4
Case 4:22-mj-00344-BJ Document 1 Filed 05/11/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 5
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 89 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 89

 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the primary author and 
                the official ``Home of Yankee Doodle''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1993

   Mr. McNulty (for himself and Mr. Solomon) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post 
                        Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the primary author and 
                the official ``Home of Yankee Doodle''.

Whereas the song ``Yankee Doodle'' is a humorous and patriotic ditty that dates 
        back to America's colonial period;
Whereas ``Yankee Doodle'' was popular from its inception, spreading throughout 
        New England and the Middle Atlantic States, where it was sung at 
        parades, in taverns, and beside campfires;
Whereas the British Regulars picked up the tune at the beginning of the American 
        Revolution as a means of deriding the rag-tag Continental Army;
Whereas, after the Battle of Lexington, ``Yankee Doodle'' became an anthem and a 
        source of pride among the rough-hewn Americans who were taking on the 
        polished British Redcoats;
Whereas, while the tune of ``Yankee Doodle'' originated in Europe as a common 
        air, many claims as to the authorship of the lyrics have been made;
Whereas, despite the other claims, Dr. Richard Shuckburgh, an English Army 
        surgeon who served on America's frontier for most of his adult life, is 
        today generally considered to be the primary author of the lyrics to 
        ``Yankee Doodle''; and
Whereas Dr. Shuckburgh is believed to have written almost all, if not all, of 
        the lyrics for ``Yankee Doodle'' at Fort Crailo in the city of 
        Rensselaer, New York, after viewing the provincial forces gathered there 
        in the 1750s for an attack on Fort Ticonderoga: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) Dr. Richard Shuckburgh should be recognized and honored 
        as the primary author of ``Yankee Doodle''; and
            (2) Fort Crailo in the present-day city of Rensselaer, New 
        York, should be recognized as the official ``Home of Yankee 
        Doodle''.

                                 <all>
```
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 154

To designate the week of June 7, 1993, through June 14, 1993, as ‘‘National

Flag Celebration Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. MCCLOSKEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week of June 7, 1993, through June 14,

1993, as ‘‘National Flag Celebration Week’’.

Whereas it is the obligation of each generation of Americans

to instruct the next in the significance of our history and

of the meaning of and the ideals embodied in our

Nation’s patriotic symbols;

Whereas the flag of the United States is the principal patriotic symbol of our Nation;

Whereas the citizens of the United States already celebrate

the observance of Flag Day on June 14 of each year:

Now, therefore, be it
2

•HJ 154 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning June 7, 1993, which culminates

4 with the observance of Flag Day on June 14, 1993, be

5 declared National Flag Celebration Week, during which

6 the Nation’s school children would be encouraged to

7 discuss and study our flag, and the ideals it represents.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        WALNUT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

                Statement re: Calculation of Per Share Earnings



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three months ended March 31,
                                                                   ---------------------------------
                                                                     1997                    1996
                                                                   -------                 ---------
          <S>                                            <C>                      <C>
          Net income (loss)                              $           (1,035,431)  $       1,624,173
          Shares:
          Weighted average number of common shares
          outstanding                                                 14,616,687         12,814,713

          Shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive
          options and warrants                                                 0            438,865
                                                         -----------------------     --------------
                             Total                                    14,616,687 (1)     13,253,578
                                                         =======================     ==============
                 Income (loss) per common share          $                (0.07)  $            0.12
                                                         ======================      ==============

</TABLE>


         (1)     The results of this calculation for the three-month period
                 ending March 31, 1997 are antidilutive and, as such, are not
                 presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
                 Operations. The weighted average shares used in the
                 calculation for per share earnings for the three-months ended
                 March 31, 1997 are 14,616,687.





                                Page 17 of 17
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130547 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130547 COA: 257845 Calhoun CC: 2003-003708-FH ROSWOLD PALL ADKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000942788
<NAME> NEOPHARM, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,893,691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,893,691
<PP&E>                                          36,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,904,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,945
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,742
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,816,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,904,811
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,197
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               369,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (303,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (303,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (303,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>