alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Performance Review Board will initiate their labors on or about November 15, 2000. The following persons are members of the Performance Review Board for 2000.

Members:

Corbett Flannery, Chair

Robert Lester, SES Member

Elmer S. Owens, SES Member

Roxann A. Van Dusen, SES Member

Lois E. Hartman, Public Member

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Anne Conboy, 202-712-5438.

Dated: November 7, 2000.

Henry W. Reynolds,

Executive Secretary, Executive Resources Board.

[FR Doc. 00-29390  Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
# QSBL 063021

# QSBL 033121

# QSBL 123120

# QSBL 093020

# QSBL 063020

# QSBL 033120

# QSBL 123119

# QSBL 093019

# QSBL 063019

# QSBL 033119

# QSBL 123118

# QSBL 093018

# QSBL 063018

# QSBL 033118

# QSBL 123117

# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 43 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 84
Case 4:22-cr-00275-P Document 43 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 85
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-051-01-H

WILLIAM JARRELL HALL.

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIM LINTTED STATES MAGISTRATE JTJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI]ILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OXl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the MagisUate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedDecemb",'L',ZOZZ.

JAMES

UNITE

SLE HENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

Case 1:22-cr-00051-H-BU Document 34 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 59
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE DIS TRICT OF COLUM BIA
MIHRETU BULTI DASISA, ) ) P laintif f, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-2142 (R CL) ) HOWARD UNIV. BD. OF EDUC., ) ) Defendan t. )

MEMORAN DUM This matter is befor e the Court on the Repor t and Recommendation filed by Mag istrate J udg e De borah A . Robinson on March 1, 2010. The 14-day period duringwhich the pa rties may file objec tions to t he Report a nd Recommendation has expi red, seeL ocal Civil Rule 72.3(b), and neither pa rty has filed objec tions. The plaintiff, Mihre tu Bulti Dasisa, submitted this pro se complaint for f iling in November

2006. NamingHowar d University Boa rd of Educ ation as the sole de fenda nt, the complaint alleg es that eve nts occurring on or about 1998-99 g ave r ise to claims of discrimination under Title IX of the Educ ation Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and a br eac h of “educ ational degree contra ct.” Compl. at 3; see also id. at 2, 5. The de fenda nt moved to dismi ss the complaint bec ause a

ny claim arising fr om the events a lleg ed is barr ed by the applica

ble three

y ear limit ations period, see D.C. Code § 12-301(8) , and bec ause it fa iled to state a c laim under Title IX upon which r elief c ould be g rante d, as there was no a lleg ation of g ender discrimination, the only cog nizable discrimination under Title IX. The pla intiff filed an opposition, an ame nded opposition and a sur-r eply , but did not present evidenc e to show that his claims wer e not time-- 2 -

barr ed, that he w as alleg ing disc rimination within t he ambit of a ny fede ral statute, or

that he had a contr actua l relationship with the defe ndant. Acc ording ly , Mag istrate Judge Robinson
rec ommended g rantingthe def endant’ s motion t o dismiss the complaint for f ailure to state a claim upon which r elief ma y be g rante d. After

consideration of the Report and Rec ommendation of Mag istrate Judge D ebora h A. Robinson, the absenc e of a ny party ’s objection ther eto, the entire
rec ord bef

ore the Court and the applica ble law, the Court will adopt Mag istrate Judge Robinson’s Report and Rec ommendation and dismiss the complaint for fa ilure to state a c laim upon which relief may be g rante d. A sepa rate final orde r ac companies this memora ndum.
/s/ ROYCE C. L AMBE RTH DATE: Mar ch 22, 2010 Chief J udg e
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DAVID M., 

Plaintiff, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. Case No. 3:22-cv-02166-N-BT 

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

ORDER ACCEPTION FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

The Court has under consideration Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated 

October 11, 2023. (ECF No. 19). No objections were filed. The Court the proposed 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the 

Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2023. 

__________________________ 

DAVID C. GODBEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-02166-N-BT Document 20 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1751
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agentand Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE24 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. 

 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that: 

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stanley Hall, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Johnson, J., at plea; Angela Mazzarelli, J., on motion to withdraw plea and at sentencing), rendered September 13, 1988, convicting defendant of assault in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 3 to 6 years’ imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

On November 4, 1987, defendant, who was charged with attempted murder, waived indictment and pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree, in exchange for a promised sentence of 3 to 6 years. Earlier, while in custody awaiting arraignment, defendant attempted suicide by hanging, and was transferred to Kings County Hospital between October 30th and November 3rd, where he received antipsychotic drugs and tranquilizers. On November 3rd, the day before he pleaded guilty, defendant was again transferred to Bellevue Hospital, where he received Vistaril, a tranquilizer, and Benedryl, a sleeping medication.

Defendant, represented by new counsel, moved prior to sentencing to withdraw his plea, on the ground that defendant was confused by the medications he was receiving and was therefore unable to voluntarily and intelligently plead guilty. A hearing was held, at which the only witness was defendant’s prior Legal Aid counsel. Defendant also submitted voluminous records of his hospitalization. The court (Mazzarelli, J.), in a written decision, after careful and exhaustive analysis of both the testimony and the hospital records, denied the motion and imposed the agreed-upon sentence.

Defendant now argues that the motion should have been granted, and additionally, that the failure to adduce expert psychiatric testimony at the hearing constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.

We note, at the outset, although the point is not raised, that defendant’s suicide attempt, if interpreted as indicative of mental illness, nevertheless did not in itself require a hearing as to defendant’s competency. *(See generally, People v Gensler,*72 NY2d 239, *cert denied*488 US 932.) Indeed, defendant’s first counsel testified at the hearing to withdraw the plea that defendant appeared to be rational. The plea minutes do not *311reveal any unusual behavior by defendant—indeed, ? his answers were more than mere monosyllabic responses, and reflect normal thinking. Furthermore, the hospital records do not indicate any adverse effects, such as confusion, resulting from the medications prescribed to defendant.

Nor has defendant established ineffective assistance of trial counsel in failing to call a medical expert to testify at the hearing. We cannot say that counsel’s deliberate reliance on the medical records was not a matter of strategy. Moreover, in view of the cogent evidence that defendant was competent the failure to call a medical witness may just as likely be explained, not by counsel’s oversight, but by the tenuous nature of defendant’s arguments. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SAMUEL T. RUSSELL,

Plaintiff,

VS.

STATE OF TEXAS EDUCATION

AGENCY COMMISSIONER MIKE

MORATH,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-1842-G-BK

)

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a

Recommendation in this case. Objections were filed. The District Court reviewed de

novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to

which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings,

conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the court

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

October 7, 2022.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-01842-G-BK Document 7 Filed 10/07/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 61
#### ANDERSON v. STATE.

No. 21678.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1941.

*766J. G. Rollins, Jr., of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon. E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and by the jury awarded a penalty of fifteen years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record, and it is also noted that the statement of facts herein is not approved and signed by the judge trying the case. The same is also true of the statement of facts heard on the motion for a new trial. This is a necessary requisite before such statements can be considered by us. See Art. 760, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 760.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
Department of the Treasury

Strategic Plan Overview

2018–2022

Treasury’s Values

Treasury employees strive to maintain integrity

and uphold the public trust in all that we do, 

explore better ways of conducting business 

through innovation, seek diversity of thought and 

expertise to inform our decisions, embrace and 

adapt to change, and hold ourselves accountable

for accomplishing meaningful results for the 

American public.

Treasury’s Mission 

Treasury’s mission is to maintain a strong economy and create economic and job opportunities 

by promoting the conditions that enable economic growth and stability at home and abroad, 

strengthen national security by combatting 

threats and protecting the integrity of the financial system, and manage the U.S. Government’s 

finances and resources effectively. 

Goal 1:

Boost U.S.

Economic Growth

Goal 4:

Transform

Government-wide

Financial Stewardship

Goal 5:

Achieve

Operational

Excellence

Goal 3:

Enhance

National

Security

Goal 2:

Promote

Financial

Stability

THE

D

EPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

1789

To access the full Strategic Plan, visit www.treasury.gov/about/budget-performance
Strategic

Goal 

Strategic

 Objective

Domestic FinanceInternational AffairsTFI / FinCENTax PolicyTreasurerEconomic PolicyManagementIRSFiscal ServiceBEPU.S. MintTTBOCC

Goal 1:

Boost U.S. 

Economic 

Growth

1.1 Tax Law Implementation

1.2 Strong Economic

Fundamentals 

1.3 Trusted Currency

and Services

1.4 Free and Fair Trade

Goal 2: 

Promote 

Financial 

Stability

2.1 Housing Finance Reform

2.2 Foreign Exchange Practices

2.3 Foreign Technical

Assistance

2.4 Financial Sector Critical

Infrastructure & Cybersecurity

Goal 3: 

Enhance 

National 

Security

3.1 Strategic Threat Disruption

3.2 AML/CFT Framework

3.3 Economic Strength and 

National Security

Goal 4: 

Transform 

Governmentwide 

Financial 

Stewardship

4.1 Financial Data Access

and Use

4.2 Debt Management

4.3 Federal Financial

Performance

Goal 5: 

Achieve 

Operational 

Excellence

5.1 Workforce Management 

5.2 Treasury Infrastructure

5.3 Customer Value

Department of the Treasury

Alignment of Organizations to Strategic Objectives

2018–2022

Objective 

Leads

Support

Organizations
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF

AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ACKERMAN MCQUEEN, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-1944-G

)

)

)

)

ORDER

Before the court are defendant Anthony Makris’ (“Makris”) motions to dismiss

for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)

(docket entry 43) and for summary judgment (docket entry 78). Also before the

court are the plaintiff National Rifle Association’s objections to and motions to strike

Makris’ evidence in support of his motion to dismiss (docket entry 48) and motion

for summary judgment (docket entry 113). The motions are DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

January 16, 2024.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-01944-G-BT Document 183 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 9607
Case 4:22-cr-00264-O Document 28 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 69
Case 4:22-cr-00264-O Document 28 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 70
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Russell Green, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J.), rendered May 12, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of bail jumping in the first degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to a term of imprisonment of from 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, released on bail on a charge of robbery in the first degree, failed to appear in court on April 16, 1987, and was returned involuntarily to court on a bench warrant on September 1, 1987. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment in furtherance of justice pursuant to CPL 210.40, on the ground that defendant’s sister had recently died. That the underlying robbery indictment was ultimately dismissed did not justify defendant’s failure to obey a lawful court mandate that he appear to answer that charge *(People v Holcombe,*89 AD2d 644), and accordingly does not constitute a "compelling factor * * * clearly demonstrating” that conviction of bail jumping would constitute an injustice. (CPL 210.40 [1].) We have con*265sidered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
H. J. Res. 398

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Joint Resolution

To establish the fourth Sunday of July as ‘‘Parents’ Day’’.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the fourth

Sunday of every July shall be established as ‘‘Parents’ Day’’ to

be recognized as a recurring, perennial day of commemoration.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION.

All private citizens, organizations, and governmental and legislative bodies at the local, State, and Federal level are encouraged

to recognize Parents’ Day through proclamations, activities, and

educational efforts in furtherance of recognizing, uplifting, and

supporting the role of parents in the rearing of their children.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Agenda 

May 2004 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – April 30, 2004 

Dealer ___________________

To allow more time for discussion on Friday, please e-mail your responses prior to 4:00 p.m. on 

Wednesday, April 28, to debt.management@do.treas.gov. If you are not scheduled to meet with 

Treasury officials this quarter, your responses would still be very helpful to us, particularly answers to 

the discussion questions. Thank you. 

I. Borrowing Estimates 

Central 

Estimate 

Range that would 

not surprise you 

April – June 

 Ending Cash Balance 

July – September 

 Ending Cash Balance 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

FY2004 

FY2005 

III. Quarterly Note Issuance 

3-year – May 

5-year – May 

5-year – June 

5-year – July 

10-year- May 

10-year reopening- June 

10-year TIPS – July 

IV. Discussion Topics 

• Please elaborate on any noteworthy characteristics of your estimates of our financing needs. 

• As part of our considerations of the introduction of new TIPS, we would like your views on 

issuance. What auction cycles should longer and/or shorter dated TIPS be on? Would TIPS 

be better received in auctions with end of month, rather than mid-month, settlement? What 

sizes of new TIPS issues do you think Treasury should issue at long and/or short dated 

maturities? 

• We have a strong preference for reducing long-dated nominal issuance to make room for 

additional TIPS issuance. What are your views on how we should make this substitution 

(i.e., reduce auction sizes or the number of auctions)?
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 326 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 326

      Designating January 16, 1995, as ``National Good Teen Day.''

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 1994

  Mr. Traficant introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Designating January 16, 1995, as ``National Good Teen Day.''

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed January 16, 1992, as 
        ``Good Teen Day'';
Whereas both the United States Congress and the President of the United States 
        have proclaimed January 16, 1993, and January 16, 1994, as ``National 
        Good Teen Day'';
Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in the United States 
        according to the 1990 census;
Whereas our Nation's teenagers represent an important part of our society, and 
        the many physical and emotional changes and character-building 
        experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;
Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who have problems or 
        those who excel;
Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their intelligence, 
        abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the good which is inherent 
        in all human beings;
Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to esteem the good as 
        well as the potential that is within each of them;
Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive qualities in America's 
        youth; and
Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That January 16, 1995, is 
designated ``National Good Teen Day,'' and the President is authorized 
and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the 
United States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers of the 
United States and by participating in appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```