alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GOODEN v. STATE.

No. 21317.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1940.

R. G. Allen, of Houston (King C. Haynie, of Houston, of counsel on appeal only), for appellant.

W. C. McClain, Dist. Atty., and Ned G. Wallace, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Conroe, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The indictment embraced counts showing that on two previous occasions appellant had been convicted of felonies less than capital. Because of repetition of offenses the penalty was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life. See Article 63, P.C.

It is shown that at a time prior to this trial this defendant had been tried for a similar offense, and that for the purpose of an enhancement of the punishment, the previous convictions used in the present case had been used for the purpose of enhancing the penalty in the former case. Tex.Cr.App., 145 S.W.2d 177. The same conviction can not be twice used for enhancement purposes. In Kinney v. State, 45 Tex.Cr.R. 500, 78 S.W. 225, 79 S.W. 570, 571, this court said: “Evidently it was never intended that prior offenses could thus be made to do double duty; that is, that prior cases could be used to enhance the punishment in any given case more than once.” See also Miller v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 140 S.W.2d 859, and Cothren v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 140 S.W.2d 860.

The indictment in the present case charged appellant with burglarizing the house of Hill Shannon with the intent to commit theft. In the charge the cortrt authorized a conviction in the event the jury found that the appellant entered the house with the intent to commit theft or any felony. The charge of the court should have been limited to the allegations embraced in the indictment. Stated in another way, the jury would not have been warranted in convicting the appellant if they found that he had entered the building with the intent to commit some felony, it being alleged that the entry was to commit theft only. Emerson v. State, 54 Tex.Cr.R. 628, 114 S.W. 834, 835.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the Court.
Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 1 of 8   PageID 3Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 1 of 8   PageID 3

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 2 of 8   PageID 4Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 2 of 8   PageID 4

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 3 of 8   PageID 5Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 3 of 8   PageID 5

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 4 of 8   PageID 6Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 4 of 8   PageID 6

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 5 of 8   PageID 7Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 5 of 8   PageID 7

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 6 of 8   PageID 8Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 6 of 8   PageID 8

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 7 of 8   PageID 9Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 7 of 8   PageID 9

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 8 of 8   PageID 10Case 3:22-mc-00027-B   Document 1-2   Filed 04/21/22    Page 8 of 8   PageID 10
#### COX v. STATE.

No. 21309.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 4, 1940.

Joe Bailey Morris, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is passing a forged instrument. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for three years.

No notice of appeal appears in the record. This is necessary to give this court jurisdiction of the case. See Art. 827, C. C.P., and cases cited under said article in Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P. Vol. 3, p. 197. See, also, Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C § 588 and cases cited.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Mr. Michael J. Lidgard, Manager 

NPDES Permits Unit 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, Washington 98101-3140 

Subject: Proposed 2013 Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater from Industrial Facilities, 

response to request for draft certification 

Dear Mr. Lidgard: 

The Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) reviewed the above· referenced permit and fact 

sheet, and provided comments to EPA Headquarters and Region 10 on November 22, 2013. EPA has 

requested that DEQ grant, waive, or deny §401 certification of the draft permit on or before January 4, 

2014. This letter is to inform you that DEQ cannot grant certification until such time that EPA has 

sufficiently addressed the comments that were submitted last month. There are several issues with the 

current permit requirements that need to be resolved before DEQ can be assured that Idaho water quality 

standards will be met through the implementation of this permit. 

We would like to request that EPA provide us with a response to our comments as soon as is possible. 

DEQ will then draft a certification, offer a 30-day public comment period, and provide a final certification 

of the proposed final permit within 60 days of receipt of the request from EPA. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this action, please contact Miranda Adams at 208-373-

0574 or via email at miranda.adams@deq.idaho.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Barry N. Burnell 

Water Quality Division Administrator 

BNB:MA:ls 

c: Margaret McCauley, EPA Region 10 

Regional Water Quality Managers, DEQ 

Printed on R ec y c led P a p e r
Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 26 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 54
Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 26 Filed 08/29/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 55
Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 26 Filed 08/29/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 56
Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 26 Filed 08/29/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 57
Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 26 Filed 08/29/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 58
Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 26 Filed 08/29/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 59
Case 2:22-cr-00065-Z-BR Document 26 Filed 08/29/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 60
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 212

Designating the week beginning November 7, 1993, as ‘‘National Women

Veterans Recognition Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. SLATTERY, Mrs. MINK, Mr. DE LUGO, Mr.

GREENWOOD, Mr. MINETA, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. WOLF, Mrs. COLLINS of

Illinois, Ms. DANNER, Mr. FROST, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr.

MORAN, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. DEUTSCH,

Mr. BEVILL, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. HEFNER, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. WALSH,

Mr. APPLEGATE, Mr. FILNER, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. VALENTINE, Ms.

ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HUTTO, Mr. PETERSON of Florida,

Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr.

SPENCE, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. FISH, Mr.

SISISKY, Mr. EMERSON Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. STUMP, Mr. KREIDLER, Mr.

SANDERS, Mr. BACCHUS of Florida, Mr. PARKER, Mr. LANCASTER, Mr.

FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. EVANS, Mr. CAMP, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mrs. MALONEY, Ms. BYRNE, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. DORNAN,

Mr. KING, Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. BAKER

of California, Mr. SHAW, Mr. LAZIO, Mrs. UNSOELD, Mr. MILLER of

California, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. CRAMER, Ms. BROWN of

Florida, Mr. KASICH, Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut, Mr. BONIOR, Mr.

HILLIARD, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr.

GILMAN, and Mr. QUILLEN) introduced the following joint resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service
2

•HJ 212 IH

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning November 7, 1993, as

‘‘National Women Veterans Recognition Week’’.

Whereas there are more than 1,200,000 women veterans in

the United States representing 4.6 percent of the total

veteran population;

Whereas the number of women serving in the United States

Armed Forces and the number of women veterans continue to increase;

Whereas women veterans have contributed greatly to the security of the United States through honorable military

service, often involving great hardship and danger;

Whereas the special needs of women veterans, especially in

the area of health care, have often been overlooked or inadequately addressed by the Federal Government;

Whereas the lack of attention to the special needs of women

veterans has discouraged or prevented many women veterans from taking full advantage of the benefits and services to which they are entitled; and

Whereas designating a week to recognize women veterans will

help both to promote important gains made by women

veterans and to focus attention on the special needs of

women veterans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning November 7, 1993, is designated

4 as ‘‘National Women Veterans Recognition Week’’, and

5 the President is authorized and requested to issue a proc-
3

•HJ 212 IH

1 lamation calling upon the people of the United States

2 to observe that week with appropriate ceremonies and

3 activities.

Æ
Case 4:22-cr-00244-P Document 405 Filed 09/07/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 181
Case 4:22-cr-00244-P Document 405 Filed 09/07/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 182
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 06, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 06, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A0190. JOSEPH LEE GRINER v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-399-000]

Take notice that the conference scheduled for Tuesday, November 14, 2000, at 10 a.m. has been rescheduled.

The conference will be held on Tuesday, December 5, 2000, at 10 a.m. in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29332  Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on Thursday, November 16, 2000. 

The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated resource management plan for those lands and waters within the Corridor. 

The meeting will convene at 7 p.m. in the Capron Conference Room of the Quaker Inn & Conference Center the following reasons: 

1. Approval of Minutes 

2. Chairman's Report 

3. Executive Director's Report 

4. Planning Subcommitte Report 

5. Public Input 

It is anticipated that about twenty people will be able to attend the session in addition to the Commission members. 

Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made prior to the meeting to: 

Michael Creasey, Executive Director, John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895; Tel.: (401) 762-0250. 

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Michael Creasey, Executive Director of the Commission at the aforementioned address. 

Michael Creasey,

Executive Director BRVNHCC.

[FR Doc. 00-29391 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 264

Designating the month of March 1994 as ‘‘Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Awareness Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the month of March 1994 as ‘‘Chronic Fatigue

Syndrome Awareness Month’’.

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) causes debilitating fatigue for between 2,000,000 and 5,000,000 Americans;

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome often follows an illness

such as the flu, bronchitis, hepatitis, gastrointestinal illness or mononucleosis, and sometimes develops gradually

with no apparent cause;

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome often seems to begin

during a time when the individual is experiencing severe

stress;
2

•HJ 264 IH

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome combines symptoms of

depression such as fatigue, malaise, sleep disorders, lowgrade fever and memory and concentration problems with

other symptoms such as persistent sore throat and lymph

glands, muscle and joint aches;

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is not caused by any single agent and immunological findings in people with

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are inconsistent and not highly reproducible;

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome remains an enigma to

the international medical community and no proven effective treatment exists;

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome does not go away with

a few good nights sleep but slyly steals a person’s vigor

over months and years; and

Whereas Chronic Fatigue Syndrome appears in people of all

ages, races, and socioeconomic classes: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the month of March 1994 is designated as ‘‘Chronic

4 Fatigue Syndrome Awareness Month’’. The President is

5 authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe such a

7 month with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activi8 ties.

Æ
Case 3:22-mj-00604-BT Document 7 Filed 06/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19
### AIRPOR T 

# ^tiow n Count y 207 7 AIRPOR T DRIVE , STE . 1 8 GREE N BAY , WISCONSI N 54313-559 6 

### A t ae+St ^ C#'«ra « «A^s/ j 

## Internationa l Airpor t 'QimmnBa y THOMA S W . MILLE R PHON E (920 ) 498-480 0 FA X (920 ) 498-879 9 We b page : www.co.brown.wi.us/airDor t AIRPOR T DIRECTO R Marc h10 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon dH . LaHoo d Secretary U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-W k Dea r Mr . Secretary : Than k yo u for th e opportunit y t o expres s my suppor t for th e applicatio n for

antitrus t immunity an dpropose djoin t busines s agreemen t

filedb y America n Airline s an dJapan Airlines . Th e propose dallianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l for oneworl dt o compet e effectivel y withth e Star an dSkyTea malliance . Thi s increase dinterallianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o f th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y - first b y solidifyin g U.S.-Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b y servin g a s afoundatio n for further liberalizatio n acros s Asia . After athoroug hreview , I encourag e th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t

woul denabl e thes e oneworl dallianc e airline s t o wor k closel y togethe r

t o delive r highl y competitiv e ai r

transportatio n services . Approva l for AA/JA Lallianc e wil l hav e apositiv e impac t

o n ai r trave l b y offerin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an dwil l hel p t o ensur e tha t customer s continu e t o benefi t fromhavin g thre e competitiv e ai r

alliance s t o choos e from . I urg e yo u t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely , 

# if . iivXJ Thoma s W . Mille r Airport Directo r mille r tw@co.brown.wi.u s



### Aservic e provide d b yBrow n Count yGovernmen t

100 % Recycle d Pape r
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 344

Designating May 14, 1994, as ‘‘National Police Survivors Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1994

Mr. MANTON (for himself and Ms. DUNN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating May 14, 1994, as ‘‘National Police Survivors

Day’’.

Whereas the police officers of America work devotedly and

selflessly to serve and protect the people of this Nation,

regardless of the peril or hazard to themselves;

Whereas each year nearly 150 Federal, State, and municipal

police officers are tragically killed in the line of duty

while safeguarding the lives and property of their fellow

Americans;

Whereas the lives of surviving family members of police officers killed in the line of duty are forever changed; and
2

•HJ 344 IH

Whereas these survivors, who have experienced such great

loss, have earned the gratitude of the Nation: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 14, 1994, is designated as ‘‘National Police

4 Survivors Day’’, and the President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe the day with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
#### HENDRIX v. STATE.

No. 21408.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 29, 1941.

*248Roy A. Scott, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of felony theft, and his punishment was assessed by the jury at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment and all matters of procedure ' appear regular.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 6:22-cr-00017-H-BU Document 32 Filed 12/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
DLD-064 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 18-3054

___________

In re: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

January 3, 2019

Before: JORDAN, GREENAWAY, JR., and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: January 25, 2019)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Timothy Doyle Young is a longtime inmate of USP-Florence, a maximum security 

prison in Colorado. Though neither housed in this Circuit, nor currently litigating in this 

Circuit, Young has filed a mandamus petition seeking from this Circuit an order “that 

forces the DOJ to treat [his] chronic Hepatitis-infection.”1

 Young also asks that we 

 * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.

1 It appears that we are but the latest forum in which Young has shopped his request for 
2

declare unconstitutional the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) and various other 

statutes that purportedly “have prevented Due Process and access to the Courts.” 

Young’s petition will be denied, largely for the same reason we denied the 

mandamus petition he filed in this Court almost nine years ago. See In re Young, 382 F. 

App’x 148, 149 (3d Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (concluding, inter alia, that “[w]e have no 

power to issue writs with respect to a matter not within our jurisdiction”). We conclude 

as well that Young has satisfied none of the criteria for mandamus relief. See generally

Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183 (2010) (per curiam) (requiring mandamus 

petitioner to show that (1) he has no other adequate means to get the relief he seeks; (2) 

his right to relief is clear and immune from dispute; and (3) mandamus relief is 

appropriate under the circumstances of his case).

2 

 

medical treatment. See, e.g., Young v. Sickler, 732 F. App’x 358, 359 (5th Cir. 2018) 

(per curiam) (“Young’s claims regarding any denial of treatment of his Hepatitis C 

condition are not before us and would be properly pursued only in Colorado, where he is 

housed.”).

2 Young is advised that mandamus may not be used to circumvent the fee requirements of 

the PLRA. See Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 78 (3d Cir. 1996), superseded in part by

3d Cir. L.A.R. 24.1(c) (2011) (“A litigant should not be able to evade the PLRA by 

masking as a mandamus petition a paper otherwise subject to the Act . . .. It is the nature 

of the document, rather than the label attached by the litigant, that controls.”).