alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-LC20

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 63 ) ll-K - (B ) -5 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:50AM Sheet 63 of 325P. 2

II-K-(B)-5 1

DOCUMENTATIO N

O F IFCA M INPUT S PROVIDE D B

YRADIAN , Lette r fro

m M . Kelly , Radia nt o E . Medine , EEA . Augus t 7 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-5 1
Case 4:22-cr-00139-P Document 16 Filed 05/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 29
Case 4:22-cr-00139-P Document 16 Filed 05/25/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 30
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Richardson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), rendered June 1, 1989, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez, 47*NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 285 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 285

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 2182) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for military activities of the 
Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense 
programs of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths 
for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes, the 
Secretary of the Senate shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 3136, strike out ``20 percent'' and insert 
        in lieu thereof ``80 percent''.
            (2) Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to authorize 
        appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for military activities of 
        the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for 
        defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe 
        personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, 
        and for other purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 17, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 285

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in 
                       the enrollment of S. 2182.
```
# Official Journal C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 249I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6329 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 249I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6329 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Adoption of amendments to the Rules of Procedure of Eurojust | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 249 I/01

Adoption of amendments to the Rules of Procedure of Eurojust

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

138125 

ANTHONY T. MAYES, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138125 

 COA: 287367 

WCAC: 06-000099 

CITY OF OAK PARK and MICHIGAN 

MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WORKERS’ 

COMPENSATION FUND, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DIBY AKO PLAINTIFF

vs. No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

ARRIVA BEST SECURITY, INC.,

and AMOIFO KOFFI DEFENDANTS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

AGAINST DEFENDANT ARRIVA BEST SECURITY, INC.

The Court having reviewed the Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant

Arriva Best Security, Inc., and the grounds therefore, finds the Motion is well taken and 

grants the Motion.

It is ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Arriva 

Best Security, Inc. is GRANTED.

ORDERED on __________, ___, 2023.

Hon. Karen Gren Scholer

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-01751-S Document 28-6 Filed 08/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 126
# Official Journal L 108I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 108I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6128 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 108I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6128 April 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/657 of 25 April 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 as regards the date of entry into storage of the skimmed milk powder sold by a tendering procedure | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/658 of 25 April 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/657 of 25 April 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 as regards the date of entry into storage of the skimmed milk powder sold by a tendering procedure

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/658 of 25 April 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# L_2013237EN.01S00302.xml

| 5.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 237/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 237/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 603

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ROSALINDA GARCIA , Appellant,

v.
COSTA MESSA RESTAURANT, CHRISTOPHER G. ACOSTA, HAIDAR PROPERTIES LTD , Appellee s

.

_ ___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_ ___________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
This cause is before the Court on a joint motion to dismiss appeal

. The parties
, having reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences , request the

cause be dismissed.2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to
dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a).
The joint motion to dismiss is granted , and the appeal is hereby dismissed

. In accordance

with the motion , costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained.

GINA M. BENAVIDES Justice

Delivered and filed on the 11th day of May , 20 2 3

.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R.L. Smith, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | /s/ Gregory
 R. L. Smith       
| | Name: Gregory
 R. L. Smith     
| | Title: Chief
 Financial Officer
| | August 13,
 2009               

- 23 -

---
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

___________ 

No. 23-10718

___________ 

Jennifer VanDerStok; Michael G. Andren; Tactical 

Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company; Firearms Policy 

Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs—Appellees,

Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing 

business as 80 Percent Arms; Defense Distributed; Second 

Amendment Foundation, Incorporated; Not An L.L.C., 

doing business as JSD Supply; Polymer80, Incorporated,

Intervenor Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General; United States 

Department of Justice; Steven Dettelbach, in his official 

capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,

Defendants—Appellants.

____________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691 

____________________________ 

Before Willett, Engelhardt, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10718 Document: 00516974334 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/20/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 271 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5294
No. 23-10718

2

J U D G M E N T

This cause was considered on the record on appeal and was argued by 

counsel.

IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the 

District Court is AFFIRMED IN PART and VACATED IN PART, 

and the cause is REMANDED to the District Court for further proceedings 

in accordance with the opinion of this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party bear its own costs 

on appeal.

Andrew S. Oldham, Circuit Judge, concurring.

Case: 23-10718 Document: 00516974334 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/20/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 271 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5295
First Amended Mediation Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

PACIFIC PLUS INTERNATIONAL, 

INC.,

§

§

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§

 Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-00853-L

NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

§

§

§

 Defendant. §

FIRST AMENDED MEDIATION ORDER

Before the court is the Parties’ Agreed Motion to Extend the Mediation Deadline 

(“Motion”) (Doc. 21), filed June 7, 2023. The court determines that the Motion should be, and is 

hereby, granted. The parties are therefore directed to participate in mediation by July 12, 2023.

All parties shall appear in person, unless excused by the court, before a mediator of the parties’

mutual choosing and participate in mediation. If a party is an entity rather than an individual, a 

person with settlement authority must appear in person on behalf of the entity. Further, in light 

of the COVID-19 Pandemic, to facilitate mediation, the court allows the parties to conduct 

mediation by video teleconference or video conference as long as someone with settlement 

authority for each party attends the mediation. The mediator shall submit a report to the court 

within three days of the mediation.

In accordance with § III(G) of this court’s Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan, 

the clerk of the court shall transmit to counsel a copy of its “Alternative Dispute Resolution 

Summary” form. Counsel shall be jointly responsible for ensuring that the mediator receives the 

form in a timely fashion. The mediator is ordered to return the form to the clerk of the court (not 

Case 3:22-cv-00853-L Document 23 Filed 06/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 306
First Amended Mediation Order – Page 2

to the undersigned’s chambers) in accordance with the clerk’s instructions. The mediator’s 

obligation to return the clerk’s form is separate from the obligation to submit a report to the court.

It is so ordered this 8th day of June, 2023.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00853-L Document 23 Filed 06/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 307
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat by order of that court of 17 March 2005 in the proceedings between Amalia Valesko and Zollamt Klagenfurt

(Case C-140/05)

(2005/C 143/32)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat (Austria) of 17 March 2005, received at the Court Registry on 29 March 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Amalia Valesko and Zollamt Klagenfurt on the following questions:

Question 1:

Question 2:

----
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

April 12, 2024 SC-2024-0176 Ex parte Heratio Sanchez Moore PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re:Heratio Sanchez Moore v. State of Alabama) (Madison Circuit Court: CC19-2561; Criminal Appeals: CR-2022-1047).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on April 12, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Wise, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Sellers, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Exhibit 35.10





LOGO

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015

COMM 2015-CCRE23

In accordance with
Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Agreement) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the CMBS Pool), CWCapital Asset Management LLC
(CWCAM), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officers Certificate with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAMs activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the Reporting Period) and of CWCAMs performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers
supervision and;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | that, to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.



|                              
|------------------------------
|Sincerely,                    
|CWCapital Asset Management LLC
|                              
|/s/ David B. Iannarone        
|                              
|David B. Iannarone            
|President                     

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 982/2004

of 14 May 2004         

fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled round grain rice to certain third countries in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1875/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum export refund on wholly milled round grain rice to be exported to certain third countries pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1875/2003 is hereby fixed on the basis of the tenders submitted from 10 to 13 May 2004 at 58,00 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 May 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27).

(2)OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 14.

(3)OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted), S. James Miller, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of ImageWareSystems, Inc. (the ***“Company”***),  hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.               The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006 (the ***“Report”***) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theCompany at the end of the periods covered by the Report and the results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 

Dated:  May 22, 2006

 

 
| /s/  S. James Miller                                |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| S.  James Miller, Jr.  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWareSystems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 119 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 342
Case 4:22-cr-00274-P Document 119 Filed 10/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 343
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James Murdakes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ James MurdakesJames Murdakes
Chief Executive Officer
November 7, 2006


---
#### RAWLINGS v. STATE.

No. 26130.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1953.

John D. Glass, Tyler, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of $500.

The grounds of aggravation plead and proved herein grew out of the fact that the appellant was an adult male and the person struck was a female. No serious bodily injury was alleged or proven.

The defense interposed was that of self-defense.

*1002The court in his charge instructed the jury, in part, as follows:

> “But if you believe, from the evidence, that the Defendant W. H. (Bill) ' Rawlings used more force than was necessary to effectuate his self defense, then such assault becomes unjustifiable and you will find the defendant guilty.” Appellant objected to such charge.

It is apparent therefrom that the court authorized a conviction upon a finding that the accused had used excessive force. Such was not an issue in this case.

We think appellant’s objection was well taken, and the court fell into error in not responding thereto.

Judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.