alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>					          EXHIBIT 31.02



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

  1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

  2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision,  to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

  b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.







Date:  August 16, 2004       /s/Kevin Perry
                                Kerry Perry
                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                Demeter Management Corporation,
                                general partner of the registrant
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission of the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as theChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 3,  2008 | By:    | /s/ Dan T. Bessey       |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Dan T. Bessey,          |
|                         |   | Vice President and      |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit tothe Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----
#### SWAIN v. STATE.

No. 22837.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1944.

Wright Stubbs, of Austin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. There is nothing for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; MICHAEL 

G. ANDREN; TACTICAL MACHINING 

LLC, a limited liability company; 

FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, 

INC., a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his Official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; STEVEN 

DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as 

Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Injunction (ECF No. 15), filed August 17, 2022. 

To expedite resolution of the motion, the Court ORDERS Defendants to respond to the motion by 

August 26, 2022. Plaintiffs may file a reply by August 30, 2022. 

SO ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 17 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 199
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00043-Z-BR-2

§

CANDICE SIMONE ROGERS §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

CANDICE SIMONE ROGERS, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to FED.R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1 and 2 of the Superseding 

Information. After cautioning and examining CANDICE SIMONE ROGERS under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is

supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend 

that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that CANDICE SIMONE ROGERS be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 371 -

CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES and 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) - UNLAWFUL 

USE OF A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the 

offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: September 16, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00043-Z-BR Document 59 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 197
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 221 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 221

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
           limit the terms of office for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1993

   Mr. McCrery introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
           limit the terms of office for Members of Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be valid only if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person may serve any portion of a term as 
Representative if at the completion of that term the person would have 
served as a Representative for more than six and one-half terms.
    ``Section 2. No person may serve any portion of a term as Senator 
if at the completion of that term the person would have served as a 
Senator for more than two and one half terms.
    ``Section 3. No person holding office on the date of the adoption 
of this article of amendment shall be prevented by reason of this 
article of amendment from completing that person's term of office.''.

                                 <all>
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1787 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

43) II-C-1 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200810:22:19 AM Sheet 43 of 147 
» • •-. 

__i-° SU,-

o* _ «* 

? AT* \ 

.f t " 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

November 30, 1992 

A-<to-3~7 

ir-c-l 

P.2 

Dear New Source Review (NSR) Simpliflcation Workshop Panelist, 

Enclosed is a transcript of the NSR Simpliflcation Workshop held August 12-13, 1992 in 

Chapel Hill, North Carolina. This transcript and other materials distributed at the meeting will 

be placed in the NSR Update rulemaking docket (docket number A-90-37). 

If you have any questions concerning the enclosed summary, the forthcoming meeting 

transcript or NSR rulemaking efforts in general, please contact either Larry Elmore at 

(919)541-5433, or myself at (919)541-5374. 

'%>> " 

<P%-

Sincerely, 

ps ^g^^ySL-7?^ 

William H. Lamason, Project Leader 

New Source Review Update Rulemaking 

Enclosure 
P.3 

-f~ - * V 

--.. "7 . ti -

Addressees: 

Lydia Wegman, EPA/OAQPS 

John Calcagni, EPA/AQMD 

Tim Williamson, OPAR 

Chris Knopes, OPPE 

William Tyndall, OGC 

Lynne Hamjian, RO I 

Dave Bray, RO X 

Bruce Miller, RO IV 

Marcia Spink, RO III 

Bill Becker, STAPPA/ALAPCO 

John Paul, Regional Air Pollution Control Agency, Dayton, Ohio 

John Daniel, Virginia Dept. of Air Pollution Control 

Tom Micia, NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection 

David Hawkins, NRDC 

Gary McCutchen, Radian Corp. 

Bill Lewis, Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius 

Dave Aldorfer, General Motors 

Bill Pedersen, Perkins Coie 

Andrea Bear Field, Hunton & Williams 

Michael Barr, Pillsbury, Madison and Sutro 

Vivian Mclntire, Eastman Kodak 

Leslie Ritts, Chadbourne & Parke 

Jack McClure, Shell Oil 

Larry Slimak, MVMA 

Dick Penna, AIAM 

Jim Sell, NPCA 

Dale Brooks, Chevron 

Bill Burkhart, P&G 

Dave McAvoy, Eli Lilly 

Mark Carney, US Generating Co. 

cc: 

Kent Berry, AQMD 

Ed Lillis, PPB 

David Solomon, NSRS 

Larry Elmore, NSRS 

Mike Sewell, NSRS 

Dennis Crumpler, NSRS 

Dan deRoeck, NSRS 

Eric Noble, NSRS 

Sheila Holman, OCOB 

Andy Smith, PM/S02B 

Charla Rudisill, PM/S02B 

Rosalina Rodriguez, ASB 

Clara Poffenberger, OAQPS/SSCD 

Tim Smith, PAB 

Cynthia Stahl, RO III 

Matt Haber, RO IX 

Stanley Spruiell, RO VI 

Ron VanMersbergen, RO V 

Sulin Chan, RO II
#### PARVIN v. STATE.

No. 26173.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is on a plea of guilty before the court for the offense of felony theft, the punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record and the proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.
December 26, 2012

Exemption No. 10679 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-1208

Ms. Sheryl L. Oxley

Tulsa Tech

801 East 91 st Street Tulsa, OK 74132

Dear Ms. Oxley:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 2, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Tulsa Tech, for an exemption from § 147.21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would permit a 42 hour exemption for attendance and volunteering at KidVenture/Oshkosh AirVenture.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Tulsa Tech, and would not serve in the public’s interest.

Analysis

The FAA has issued similar exemption grants in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In grant of Exemption No. 7772 (copy enclosed), the FAA has found in the past for students that participated in competitions and in preparations to participate in workshops and safety briefings provided by FAA or other aviation professionals

that the student reinforces skills learned at an Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) along with an expanded scope of gene ral aviation technology advances observed and applied by the participating student.2

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Tulsa Tech an exemption from 14 CFR § 147.21 to the extent necessary to permit authorized Tulsa Tech faculty members of the aviation maintenance technician school to attend and determine if student time spent as a volunteer participant at KidVenture/ Oshkosh Air Venture may be considered creditable to satisfy the requirements of § 147.21 curriculum hourly requirements, subject to the following

conditions and limitations.

1. This exemption is valid only for substitution of the curriculum requirements of § 147.21 as detailed in the Tulsa Tech letter dated May 2, 2012 for the purpose of student participation in KidVenture/Oshkosh Air Venture participating activities.

2. Only authorized faculty members of Tulsa Tech whose students participate in the KidVenture/Oshkosh Air Venture activities may determine if student time dedicated to preparing for and participating in the KidVenture activities may be considered creditable to satisfy the requirements of § 147.21

3. Creditable time is limited to a maximum of 42 hours per participating student per year.

This exemption terminates on May 2, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 175

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 8, 1994

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating October 1993 and October 1994 as ‘‘ItalianAmerican Heritage and Culture Month’’.

Whereas Italians and Italian-Americans have contributed to

the United States in all aspects of life, including art,

science, civil service, military service, athletics, education,

law, and politics;

Whereas Italian-Americans make up one of the largest ethnic

groups in the United States;

Whereas in recognition of the accomplishments of Christopher Columbus, recognized as one of the greatest explorers in world history and the first to record the discovery of the Americas, a national observance day was established in October of every year;
2

HJ 175 RDS

Whereas the phrase in the Declaration of Independence ‘‘All

men are created equal’’, was suggested by the Italian patriot and immigrant Philip Mazzei;

Whereas the people of the United States take great pride in

the accomplishments of the many outstanding men and

women of Italian descent who have enriched our Nation’s

history such as Fiorello La Guardia, the beloved Mayor

of New York City, and Enrico Fermi, who won the 1938

Nobel Prize in Physics;

Whereas Italy enjoys a rich cultural heritage and has given

the world the great works of Dante, the breathtaking art

of Giotti and Michelangelo, and the inspirational music of

Antonio Vivaldi and Domenico Scarlatti;

Whereas the Americas were named after the Italian explorer

Amerigo Vespucci;

Whereas Giuseppe Verdi, one of the world’s most renowned

opera composers, was born October 10, 1813;

Whereas William Paca, an Italian-American, was one of the

signers of the Declaration of Independence; and

Whereas during October 1993 and October 1994 special attention will be directed at National, State, and local programs that promote Italian heritage and culture: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That October 1994 is designated as ‘‘Italian-American

4 Heritage and Culture Month’’. The President is author5 ized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon
3

HJ 175 RDS

1 the people of the United States to observe such month

2 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives, August 5,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Presented to:

By:

Date:

Federal Aviation ECi Cylinder Administration

Airworthiness 

Directive

Introduction

NTSB

Fran Cox, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate

June 9, 2015
Federal Aviation

Administration

NTSB / FAA Meeting

• Thank you; dialogue with the NTSB is 

overdue.

Delayed by defining where ex parte begins.

• Opportunity to resolve differences between 

NTSB recommendations & FAA compliance.

• Hopefully, we find agreement...

... or at least an understanding of our decisions.

• Post-meeting: Federal docket upload of 

meeting presentations and results.

NTSB meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 2
Federal Aviation

Administration

NTSB / FAA Meeting

FAA’s presentation topics:

• Background

Timeline and fundamental information.

• Comparison of recommendations

ECi / NTSB / FAA recommendations.

• FAA Challenge Team findings

Risk analysis and resulting compliance plan.

• Going forward

Identify areas of NTSB and FAA agreement.

NTSB meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Charles, Appellant.

Judgment of Supreme Court, New York County (Albert P. Williams, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 29, 1989, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree and sentencing defendant, as a predicate felon, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

There is sufficient evidence in this case to determine beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was aided by another person actually present within the meaning of Penal Law § 160.10. The trial testimony showed that on the afternoon of October 6, 1988, the complainant, Herbert Adler, was walking along the street with a companion when the defendant and an unidentified person ran up behind them. Defendant removed the money from Adler’s pocket while his companion stole money from the pocket of Adler’s friend; defendant and his accomplice then fled in opposite directions. Only defendant was apprehended. The testimony of police officers who observed the defendant and his companion for a substantial period of time before the incident and immediately prior to and during the robbery demonstrates that the defendant and the unidentified assailant acted in concert, and that the acts *340were calculated to have a singular impact which provided the necessary diversion for the defendant and his accomplice to carry out the crime. *(See, People v Dennis,*146 AD2d 708, *affd*75 NY2d 821.)

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ross, J. P., Carro, Asch, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
From: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:41 AM

To: 'emilliken@bowerstonshale.com' <emilliken@bowerstonshale.com>

Subject: Bowerston green brick testing results

Hello Mr. Milliken,

I work with RTI International, the contractor working with the U.S. EPA in developing air 

regulations for the Brick industry, I got your name and contact information from Susan Miller of 

the BIA. The BIA has provided EPA with a spreadsheet of mercury green brick testing results 

with the intent to add a mercury raw material variability factor to the Mercury MACT floor limit. In 

order to incorporate this raw material data, EPA needs to know a little bit more about the 

general location of the clay deposits being used by the facilities.

I’m attaching a spreadsheet of the Bowerston facilities that provided green brick testing results 

to EPA via BIA. I’ve added some columns at the end to be filled out with the Name of Clay 

Deposit, Geological Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the Clay Deposit. Any 

information you are able to provide about the clay deposits will be much appreciated and 

helpful!

Thank you for your help,

Gabrielle 

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-7015

<< Green Brick Testing Results- 032515BIA- to EPA May 4 2015_Bowerston.xlsx>>