alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 232 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 232

  To designate the ten-year period beginning January 1, 1994, as the 
             ``National Decade of Historic Preservation''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 1993

   Mr. Dellums introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate the ten-year period beginning January 1, 1994, as the 
             ``National Decade of Historic Preservation''.

Whereas the people of the United States should recognize the preservation of 
        historic sites as an important component of society, history, and the 
        future;
Whereas the implementation of programs promoting efforts to further historic 
        preservation is needed greatly;
Whereas the declaration of a National Decade of Historic Preservation would 
        generate awareness of, and creative ideas about, historic preservation;
Whereas awareness of the need for historic preservation should be instilled in 
        the students of the Nation;
Whereas the people of the United States (including students) should be informed 
        about, and encouraged to utilize, the programs and procedures for 
        listing historic landmarks in the National Register of Historic Places;
Whereas section 101(h) of the National Historic Preservation Act requires the 
        Secretary of the Interior to make available to Federal agencies, State 
        and local governments, and the general public (including students) 
        information concerning historic preservation; and
Whereas the issuance of a series of commemorative stamps depicting landmarks 
        listed in the National Register of Historic Places (including landmarks 
        whose listing was achieved by student preservation groups) would promote 
        public awareness of, and student involvement in, historic preservation 
        efforts: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the ten-year period 
beginning January 1, 1994, is designated as the ``National Decade of 
Historic Preservation'', and the President is authorized and requested 
to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to 
observe the decade with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Case 1:22-cr-00035-P-BU Document 44 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 97
Case 1:22-cr-00035-P-BU Document 44 Filed 09/15/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 98
Government’s Motion to Dismiss - Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. No. 4:22-CR-253-P

LAUREN WHITNEY MOORE (01)

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

TO THE HONORABLE MARK T. PITTMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

JUDGE:

The United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, by and through the 

undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, files this Government’s Motion to Dismiss 

the Indictment filed on August 24, 2022, as to defendant LAUREN WHITNEY MOORE.

In the interest of justice, the government moves to dismiss the indictment without 

prejudice as to defendant LAUREN WHITNEY MOORE. 

Respectfully submitted,

CHAD E. MEACHAM

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/ Alex C. Lewis s/ Shawn Smith

ALEX C. LEWIS SHAWN SMITH 

Assistant United States Attorney Assistant United States Attorney

Deputy Criminal Chief Texas State Bar No. 24033206

801 Cherry Street, Suite 1700 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Telephone: 817-252-5200

Email: Shawn.Smith2@usdoj.gov

Case 4:22-cr-00253-P Document 20 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 41
Government’s Motion to Dismiss - Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that I have conferred with Curt Crum, counsel for the defendant, and 

he does not oppose the granting of this motion. 

s/ Shawn Smith 

SHAWN SMITH

Assistant United States Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 17, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the clerk for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the 

electronic case filing system of the court. The electronic case filing system sent a Notice of 

Electronic Filing to the following attorneys of record who has consented in writing to 

accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means.

s/ Shawn Smith 

SHAWN SMITH

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 4:22-cr-00253-P Document 20 Filed 11/17/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 42
Exhibit 31.2



I, Theodore B. Muftic, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Digital Lifestyles Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedure, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2004 |  | /s/ THEODORE B. MUFTIC                    
|                      |  | Theodore B. Muftic                        
|                      |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33954]


Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation--
Acquisition and Operation Exemption--Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company, 
an Oklahoma Corporation

    Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company (Applicant), a noncarrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire 
and operate the railroad line of Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company 
(Target) between Duke, OK, at milepost 0, and the Wichita, Tillman & 
Jackson Ry. Co. line, at milepost 14, located approximately 14 miles to 
the east.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Target, an Oklahoma corporation, is a 99.3%-owned subsidiary 
of Republic Gypsum Company. Applicant, a Delaware corporation, is a 
wholly owned subsidiary of Target. Target will, pursuant to Oklahoma 
and Delaware law, merge into Applicant with Applicant being the 
surviving corporation. Following the mergers, Applicant will be 
converted to a Delaware limited liability company. As a result, the 
state of incorporation of Target will be changed from Oklahoma to 
Delaware, and Target will be changed to a Delaware limited liability 
company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or about 
November 9, 2000. The earliest the transaction could be consummated was 
November 7, 2000, 7 days after the exemption was filed.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33954, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Bryan Bishop, Esq., Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP, 2200 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 2200, Dallas, TX 75201.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: November 13, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29651 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### FERNANDEZ v. STATE.

No. 21566.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1941.

*759C. H. Gilmer, of Roclcsprings, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with the crime of murder, and upon his trial was found guilty of murder with malice, and sentenced to a term of five years in the penitentiary.

We find this record in a peculiar condition. The term of court at which appellant was convicted began in September, 1940; the trial court continued such term twice, and until same adjourned on December 23, 1940, on which date appellant’s •motion for a new trial was overruled and notice of appeal was given. There was no mention of any granted time in which to prepare and have approved and filed bills of exception and statement of facts entered in the order overruling such motion. We next find the transcript filed in this court on February 26, 1941, which was well within the statutory time. However, on May 23, 1941, the statement of facts herein was filed in this court, bearing the file ■mark of the district clerk of Edwards County of date January 23, 1941. We also find that such statement of facts was agreed to by the attorneys in the case on the date of May 13, 1941, as well as approved by the trial judge at such latter date. In other words, this statement of facts was approved by the district judge 141 days after the notice of appeal was entered, and filed in this court 151 days after such notice.

 The district clerk should not file Any statement of facts until the same has received the approval of the judge trying the case, and we can not consider such a statement without the proper and timely approval of such judge. See Art. 760, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 760.

It is also noted that the statement ■of the facts adduced upon the hearing of the motion for a new trial is not agreed to by the attorneys in the case, nor approved nor signed by the trial judge. We can not consider this statement.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record. The proceedings appear to be regular, and perceiving no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
STATE OF FLORIDA, 

DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY 

SAFETY AND MOTOR 

VEHICLES,

Petitioner,

v.

JAMES R. SUTTON,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1593

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

Stephen D. Hurm, General Counsel, and Natalia Costea, Assistant General Counsel, 

Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Miami, for Petitioner.

David M. Robbins and Susan Z. Cohen of Epstein & Robbins, Jacksonville, for 

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Geologic Sequestration 

Meeting Documentation Interagency Meeting – Discuss Interagency Comments, January 26, 2010 

Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of 

Organization 

(Attach list of 

all attendees 

names and 

emails if 

possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting 

requirements, etc.)

Written Comments 

Provided? 

Did they also 

submit to Docket? 

Date sent to EPACCD 

1/21 Suzie Kocchi, 

Kocchi.suzanne@epa.gov

202-343-9387 

Agencies 

attending: 

EPA 

OMB 

CEQ 

A conference call was held to discuss interagency 

comments on the geologic sequestration proposal 

 

Yes 1/11/10
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018347EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/18 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9089 — Hellman & Friedman/Concardis Payment Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 347/07)

1.

On 20 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018347EN.01001801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hellman & Friedman LLC (‘Hellman & Friedman’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Concardis Payment Group GmbH (‘Concardis’, Germany). |

Hellman & Friedman acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of the whole of Concardis. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Hellman & Friedman: private equity investment through funds controlling several portfolio companies in a variety of economic sectors, including notably Nets, active in the provision of payments, cards, and information services in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, and Poland,

—   for Concardis: merchant acquiring services in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018347EN.01001801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9089 — Hellman & Friedman/Concardis Payment Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018347EN.01001801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018347EN.01001801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 26802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10738]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8726]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Mark Rothko''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Mark Rothko,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
a foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit objects at the Saint Louis Art Museum, Saint 
Louis, MO, from on or about May 23, 2014, until on or about September 
14, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 5, 2014.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-10738 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 105 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 105

 Providing for an adjournment of the House from the legislative day of 
Thursday, May 27, 1993, to Tuesday, June 8, 1993, and an adjournment or 
 recess of the Senate from Friday, May 28, 1993, until Monday, June 7, 
                                 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1993

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for an adjournment of the House from the legislative day of 
Thursday, May 27, 1993, to Tuesday, June 8, 1993, and an adjournment or 
 recess of the Senate from Friday, May 28, 1993, until Monday, June 7, 
                                 1993.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 
27, 1993, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, June 8, 1993, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Friday, May 28, 1993, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance with this resolution, 
it stand recessed or adjourned until noon, or until such time as may be 
specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
adjourn or recess, on Monday, June 7, 1993, or until noon on the second 
day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of 
this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointing after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

                                 <all>
```
- 

J"" SED STqrF'S, 

2~ A yU 

a 

o z 

Ftir ~~o PROTECTION 

q~ PROZEG 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

MAR 2 6 2010 

SUBJECT: Emissions Modeling Data Files for the Final Light Duty Vehicle GHG Rule 

FROM: Margaret Zawacki 

Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

Rich Mason and Marc Houyoux 

Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472-DRAFT-11549 

DATE: March 24, 2010 

The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit emissions modeling data files which were used 

to prepare air quality modeling inventories for the final light duty vehicle greenhouse gas rule . 

The emissions modeling analyses are discussed in the Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document. The air quality 

modeling analysis results are able to be replicated by using the data files provided here and the 

information in the Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Air Quality 

Modeling Technical Support Document. Following is a brief description of the information 

contained on the enclosed DVDs. 

County/SCC-level delimited summaries for criteria pollutants and (at least) select hazardous air 

pollutants (benzene, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, acrolein, 1,3-butadiene, methanol, 

naphthalene) by emissions modeling sector for the scenarios listed below. Some county-SCC 

summary files include emissions for all HAPs supported by the multi-pollutant CMAQ model. Onroad and nonroad mobile summaries are included by month using average day emissions and separately with annual totals . Point source inventories are also provided in the format for the 

Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) modeling system. The point "ORL" format of these datasets can be found online at http ://www.smokemodel.org/version2 .6/html/ch08s02s08 .html#d0e43807. 

1) 2005 base 

2) 2030 Reference 

3) 2030 Control 

MAR 2 5 2010