alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
·- ·· . 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-062-H-BQ-1 

TYLER PATRICK BROWN 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count Four of the Superseding Indictment, charging defendant with a 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 225l(a), that is, Production and Attempted Production of Child 

Pornography. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge 

finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00062-H-BQ Document 36 Filed 09/26/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 87
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed September 26, 2022. 

D. 

UNITED 

Case 5:22-cr-00062-H-BQ Document 36 Filed 09/26/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 88
UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-058-01-H

ELIJAH JAMES PEREZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bXl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated oaober t ,2023.

4,- l*

JAME SLEY HENDRIX

UNI D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-00058-H-BU Document 60 Filed 10/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 146
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10231

Conference Calendar

JOHNNY WILLIAM IRONS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DAN JOSLIN, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-2534 

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny William Irons, federal prisoner # 26283-077, appeals

the dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas

petition. He challenged his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine in violation of 21

U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. 

Irons has not shown that the district court erred in

construing his purported § 2241 petition as an unauthorized

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Reyes-Requena v. United

States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Irons’s contention
No. 06-10231

-2-

that his claims under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004),

and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), fall under

§ 2255’s savings clause is incorrect. See Padilla v. United

States, 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005). The judgment of the

district court is affirmed. Irons is warned that the filing of

frivolous pleadings in the future will subject him to sanctions.

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 290 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 290

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the special delegation sent to Haiti on Septem- ber 17, 1994, has 
        succeeded in convincing the de facto authorities in Haiti to agree to 
        leave power;
Whereas on September 18, 1994, after an agreement was reached in Port-au-Prince 
        that day, the President ordered the present deployment of men and women 
        of the United States Armed Forces in and around Haiti; and
Whereas the Congress and the people of the United States have great pride in the 
        men and women of the United States Armed Forces and fully support them 
        in all their efforts overseas, including those in Haiti: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) commends the efforts of the President in sending former 
        President Jimmy Carter, retired General Colin Powell and 
        Senator Sam Nunn to Haiti in an effort to avoid the loss of 
        American lives;
            (2) fully supports the men and women of the United States 
        Armed Forces who are carrying out their mission in Haiti with 
        professional excellence and dedicated patriotism;
            (3) supports the efforts of the President, through the 
        special delegation, to provide for the departure from power of 
        the de facto authorities and the return of democracy and the 
        rule of law in Haiti;
            (4) affirms the commitment to national reconciliation and 
        adherence to the rule of law in Haiti; and
            (5) supports an orderly withdrawal of all United States 
        Armed Forces as soon as possible.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 290

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Commending the President and the special delegation to Haiti, and 
          supporting the United States Armed Forces in Haiti.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 7, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00898

- CV

Cynthia RADDATZ , et., al., Appellant

v.

Dixie L. DAVIS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CV03555

Honorable D avid J. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on February 6, 2023 and was not filed. On February 6, 2023, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, stating that the reporter’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to request the record in writing. We therefore

ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this cou rt by February 17, 2023 that the appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, which request must designate the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits to be included. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b)(1).

Th e reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty days after the date appellant’s written proof is filed with this court. If appellant fails to request the record in writing, the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s br ief that do not require a reporter’s

record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h and and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of February, 2023

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# CA2007125EN.01000101.xml

| 6.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 125/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 125/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29438]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (00-138)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Earth Systems Science and 
Applications Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Earth 
Systems Science and Applications Advisory Committee.

DATES: Tuesday, December 5, 2000, 8:30 am to 5:30 pm; and Wednesday, 
December 6, 2000, 8:30 am to 5:30 pm.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW., Room 9H40, Program 
Review Center, Washington, DC, 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Robert Schiffer, Code YS, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
1876.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

<bullet> Assessment of the State-of-the-Enterprise
<bullet> Status Reports re: ESSAAC Subcommittees and ad hoc Panels
<bullet> Technology
<bullet> Data & Information Systems
<bullet> GPRA Performance Metrics
<bullet> ESE Budget Status
<bullet> Status of the ESE Science Implementation Plan
<bullet> Summary of First Day
<bullet> Applications Strategic and Implementation Planning
<bullet> Technology Strategy and Roadmap
<bullet> Strategic Planning Status Overview--ESE Vision
<bullet> Discussion Period
<bullet> Debriefing/Closing Remarks
<bullet> ESSAAC Deliberation Session
<bullet> Summary of Actions, Future Schedule

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: November 13, 2000.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-29438 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6)
(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-250-Y 

 § 

CARLOS LOPEZ-GARCIA (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 23, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00250-Y Document 19 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 27
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 373

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1994

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the

People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 2, 1994, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.
2

HJ 373 IH

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 21, 2018

No. 04-18-00263-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF X.E.R., A CHILD,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA02538

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a motion requesting access to the sealed clerk’s record and an 

extension of time to file his brief. Appellant’s request to access the sealed record is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s attorney may appear and review the sealed record at the court. Appellant’s brief is 

due twenty days from the date of this order. All parties and their attorneys are ORDERED not to 

share the contents of the sealed record with any person except to the extent necessary to prepare 

their respective briefs. In the event appellant or appellee reference the sealed record in their 

respective briefs, they are ORDERED to (1) file their respective briefs in paper form only, (2) 

with a cover letter informing the Clerk of this court that the brief references the sealed record. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(c)(3) (exception to electronic filing for documents under seal).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Juan Jimenez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 783

- C R

Trial court case number: 1408197

Trial court: 18 3 rd District Court of H a rri s County

On December 1 5

, 201 6

, this Court affirmed the judgment of conviction of the

appellant, Juan Jimenez

. Our plen a r y p o w e r h a s n ot y e t e x pir e d.

O n February 3, 2017, appellant, Juan Jimenez, filed a pro se letter

- motion in this

Court requesting that he be provided with a copy of his trial transcripts as soon as

possible. While Jimenez w a s ind i g e nt a t tri a l a nd on a p p ea l, he do e s not a l l e g e

, a nd the

record do e s not ind i ca te, that he r e qu e sted a c o p y of the clerk’s and reporter’s

r e c ords f r om his appointed appellate counsel, Juan Manuel Contreras, Jr., the trial court,

or t he district c le r k , or inquir e d a bout i ts cost, b e fo r e s ee ki n g r e l i e f f rom this C ourt.

The Court of Crimin a l A pp ea ls h a s h e ld that ind i g e nt d e f e n d a nts a r e not e nt i t l e d

to a f re e c o p y of t h e tri a l r e c o rd to pr e p a re p e t i t i ons for disc re t i on a r y r e v i e w or h a b ea s

r e l ie f. In re Bonill a

, 424 S

. W .3d 52 8

, 532 ( Te x

. Crim. App. 2014 ) ( noting i ndigent

defendants have right to appointed counsel and free trial record on direct appeal, but n ot

for discretionary review of decisions of court of appeals or for collateral attacks on their

convictions )

. As Jimenez is not le g a l l y e nt i t l e d to a f re e tri a l r ec ord und e r these

c ir c ums t a n ce s, we l a c k the a uthori t y to r e qui r e the district c le r k to fu r nish him with a

free c o p y

. Cf. In re T homa s

, No. 1 4

- 16

- 00642

- CR, 2016 W L 4484923 , at *1 ( Te x

. App.

— Houston [ 14th D is t .] Au g

. 25, 2016, or i g

. proc ee di n g ) ( p e r c u ri a m) (m e m. op

. , not

d e si g n a t e d for publ ic a t i o n ) (d e n y i n g mand a mus p e t i t i on s ee king to c ompel tri a l judge to

ord e r district c le r k to g ive indigent d e f e nd a nt f r e e r e c o rd a f

t e r dir ec t app e a l ) . Thus, the

appellant’s letter

- mo t ion i s D E N I ED

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

D ate: February 23, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-044-Y 

 § 

MOISES CHAVEZ-SALDANA (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED May 19, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00044-Y Document 25 Filed 05/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 135

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 26 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the months of May 1993 and May 1994 as

‘‘National Trauma Awareness Month’’.

Whereas more than 9,000,000 individuals in the United

States suffer traumatic injury each year;

Whereas traumatic injury is the leading cause of death for

individuals under 44 years of age in the United States;

Whereas every individual is a potential victim of traumatic

injury;
2

•HJ 135 RDS

Whereas traumatic injury often occurs without warning;

Whereas traumatic injury frequently renders its victims incapable of caring for themselves;

Whereas past inattention to the causes and effects of trauma

has led to the inclusion of trauma among the most neglected medical conditions in the United States;

Whereas it is estimated that the people of the United States

will spend more than $175,000,000,000 this year on the

problem of trauma;

Whereas trauma is preventable and increased efforts to prevent trauma would reduce or eliminate deaths and disability due to trauma;

Whereas the problem of trauma can be remedied only by prevention and treatment through emergency medical services and trauma systems; and

Whereas the people of the United States must be educated

in the prevention and treatment of trauma and in the

proper and effective use of emergency medical systems:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 1993 and May 1994 are each designated as

4 ‘‘National Trauma Awareness Month’’ and the President

5 is authorized and directed to issue a proclamation calling
3

•HJ 135 RDS

1 upon the people of the United States to observe these

2 months with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.