alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit





Relocation Repayment Agreement
In consideration of the relocation costs paid by HomeTrust Bank, I hereby agree to the following Relocation Repayment Agreement in the event of my resignation or termination for cause within the first 24 months of my employment.  I agree to reimburse 100% of the household goods moving expenses (packing, transport, delivery and unpacking) and the cost of temporary housing in the event of my resignation of employment or termination for cause before completion of the second year of my new employment.  
If, at the time my final payroll check is issued, I have not yet reimbursed HomeTrust Bank any sums owed under this Agreement, I expressly authorize HomeTrust Bank to withhold such sums from my final payroll check or from any other amounts owed me (i.e. unpaid PTO). In the event such repayment is not made as provided herein, or a remaining balance is owed to HomeTrust Bank after termination of my employment, I further agree to pay all costs reasonably incurred by HomeTrust Bank in connection with the collection of amounts owed.


This Agreement does not constitute an employment contract for a definite term.  I may, at any time, terminate the employment relationship with or without cause and with or without notice and HomeTrust Bank may, at any time, terminate the employment relationship with or without cause and with or without notice. 


	
				
	Keith J. Houghton
	 
	March 10, 2014
	 

	Applicant/Employee (Please Print)
	 
	Employment Start Date
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Applicant/Employee Signature
	 
	Date
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Human Resources Manager
	 
	Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 01-01]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 01-01 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: November 16, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 70551)          ( print page 70552)          ( print page 70553)          ( print page 70554)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-29931 Filed 11-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
# Official Journal L 391/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 391 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6320 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 391

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6320 November 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/1731 of 28 October 2020 | 1 |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Committee of the Regions Decision No 18/2020 on public access to Committee of the Regions documents | 3 |
| | * | Decision of the Governing Board of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking of 11 August 2020 laying down internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the IMI 2 JU | 12 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1731 of 28 October 2020

1

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Committee of the Regions Decision No 18/2020 on public access to Committee of the Regions documents

3

*

Decision of the Governing Board of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking of 11 August 2020 laying down internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the IMI 2 JU

12

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JANICE LIND,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 436 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1247

___________ Ernest Kramme, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Safelite Group, Inc.; Safelite * Fulfillment, Inc.; Safelite Glass * [UNPUBLISHED] Corporation; Safelite Autoglass, Inc., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 6, 2008 Filed: June 11, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ernest Kramme appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from in a light most favorable to Kramme, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman , 289 F.3d 517, 520-2- (8th Cir. 2002), we find no basis for reversal . Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JAMES E. STRONG, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00136-O-BP

 §

UNITED PETROLEUM §

TRANSPORTS, INC., § 

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court are Magistrate Judge Ray’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

(the “FCR”) (ECF No. 164); Plaintiff’s Objection (ECF No. 165);1 Defendant’s Response (ECF 

No. 166); and Plaintiff’s Reply (ECF No. 167). After reviewing all relevant matters of record in 

this case, including the FCR and objection thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge believes that the FCR is correct, and the findings and 

conclusions therein are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 153) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims are 

DISMISSED with prejudice. Separate final judgment shall issue.

SO ORDERED on this 1st day of July, 2024.

1 Plaintiff’s Objection is untimely due to being filed fifteen days—not fourteen days—after issuance of the April 4, 

2024 FCR. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2) (“Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended 

disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.”). 

Plaintiff’s Objection was physically stamped by the Clerk of Court as filed on April 19, 2024 and subsequently 

docketed that same day. The electronic docketing information confirms that Plaintiff’s Objection was both received 

and filed by the Clerk of Court on April 19, 2024. Because April 19, 2024 is fifteen days after issuance of the April 4, 

2024 FCR, Plaintiff’s Objection is untimely.

_____________________________________

Reed O’Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00136-O Document 168 Filed 07/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2250
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

___________ 

No. 22-11071

___________ 

Jennifer VanDerStok; Michael G. Andren; Tactical 

Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company; Firearms Policy 

Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General; United States 

Department of Justice; Steven Dettelbach, in his official 

capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,

Defendants—Appellants,

consolidated with

___________ 

No. 22-11086

___________ 

Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing 

business as 80 Percent Arms,

Intervenor Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General; United States 

Department of Justice; Steven Dettelbach, in his official 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-11071 Document: 00516884679 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 260 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5190
No. 22-11071

c/w No. 22-11086

2

capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,

Defendants—Appellants.

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691 

______________________________ 

CLERK’S OFFICE:

Under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), the appeal is dismissed as of 

September 06, 2023, pursuant to appellants’ motion.

 LYLE W. CAYCE

 Clerk of the United States Court

 of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

 

 By: _________________________ 

 Roeshawn Johnson, Deputy Clerk

 ENTERED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COURT

Case: 22-11071 Document: 00516884679 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 260 Filed 09/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5191
TOG001 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG001 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 2TOG001 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 2 of 2TOG002 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG002 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 2TOG002 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 2 of 2TOG003 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG003 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 2TOG003 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 2 of 2TOG004 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG004 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 1TOG005 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG005 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 4TOG005 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 2 of 4TOG005 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 3 of 4TOG005 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 4 of 4TOG006 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG006 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 2TOG006 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 2 of 2TOG007 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG007 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 1TOG008 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG008 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 1TOG009 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG009 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 2TOG009 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 2 of 2TOG010 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1

NOTE: This lab’s MDL was BETTER than the DQO, and this fact combined

with the fact that one MDL rep was discarded by the Q test us to discarded

‐ led

instruct the lab to ignore the flag when they asked about it.TOG010 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 1TOG014 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG014 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 1TOG015 Electronic Reporting Form – page 1 of 1TOG015 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 1 of 4TOG015 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 2 of 4TOG015 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 3 of 4TOG015 NOTEBOOK DATA – page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29732]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Statement of Organization, Functions and Delegations of 
Authority: Correction

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.

ACTION: Correction Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects the notice: Social Security 
Administration--Statement of Organization, Functions and Delegations of 
Authority, published in the Federal Register on September 26, 1997 (62 
FR 50649).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the notice document 97-25611, which 
appeared on pages 50649 and 50650 in the issue of Friday, September 26, 
1997, we show two incorrect SAC's for the Office of Publication and 
Logistics Management in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Finance, 
Assessment and Management (ODCLCA). This correction notice corrects 
that mistake. Make the correction as follows:
    On page 50649, in the second column under ``Organization'', item D, 
change the SAC in parentheses from S1SC to S1SH and in item E, change 
the SAC in parentheses from S1SH to S1SN.
    On page 50649, in the second column under ``Functions'', item D, 
change the SAC in parentheses from S1SC to S1SH. On page 50649, in the 
third column under ``Functions'', item E, change the SAC in parentheses 
from S1SH to S1SN.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
Lewis H. Kaiser,
Director, Center for Classification and Organization Management.
[FR Doc. 00-29732 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-U
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 78

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 26 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the weeks beginning May 23, 1993, and May

15, 1994, as ‘‘Emergency Medical Services Week’’.

Whereas emergency medical services is a vital public service;

Whereas access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury;

Whereas efforts to establish emergency medicine as a medical

specialty began 25 years ago with the founding of the

American College of Emergency Physicians in 1968;
2

•HJ 78 RDS

Whereas the members of emergency medical services teams

are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24

hours a day, 7 days a week;

Whereas emergency medical services teams consist of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical

technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators, and others;

Whereas approximately 2⁄3 of all emergency medical services

providers are volunteers;

Whereas the members of emergency medical services teams,

whether career or volunteer, engage in thousands of

hours of specialized training and continuing education to

enhance their lifesaving skills;

Whereas Americans benefit daily from the knowledge and

skills of these highly trained individuals;

Whereas it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of emergency medical services providers

by designating Emergency Medical Services Week; and

Whereas the designation of Emergency Medical Services

Week will serve to educate all Americans about injury

prevention and how to respond to a medical emergency:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the weeks beginning May 23, 1993, and May 15,

4 1994, are designated as ‘‘Emergency Medical Services

5 Week’’ and the President is authorized and requested to

6 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United
3

•HJ 78 RDS

1 States to observe such weeks with appropriate ceremonies

2 and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Case 4:22-cr-00034-O Document 139 Filed 03/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 411
Case 4:22-cr-00034-O Document 139 Filed 03/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 412
H. J. Res. 281

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c)

of Public Law 103–88 is amended by striking out ‘‘October 21,

1993’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October 28, 1993’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

18:11 Oct 26, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\HJ281.ENR bend06
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Murdakes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ James Murdakes

James Murdakes
Chief Executive Officer
May 6, 2004
|----------------------------------------------------------------------





---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arthur
J. Bourgeois, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                        /s/ Arthur J. Bourgeois
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Arthur J. Bourgeois
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        August 12, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220

2014 PREEMPTION REPORT

FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE

The Federal Insurance Office (FIO) issues this report on actions taken regarding preemption of
inconsistent State insurance measures, pursuant to the Federal Insurance Office Act of 2010.
31 U.S.C. § 313(n)(1).

During the year ending September 30, 2014, FIO did not take any actions regarding the
preemption of any State insurance measure.

Michael T. McRaith
Director, Federal Insurance Office
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JERAL DURANT HENDERSON, §

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-cv-1922-E (BT)

§

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant.

§

§

§

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This civil pro se case was initiated on August 30, 2022, when Plaintiff filed a complaint

and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 3, 4.) On September 1, 2022, the 

Magistrate Judge issued a Notice of Deficiency and Order because Plaintiff’s complaint failed to 

comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff did not respond, and he 

failed to comply with the Court’s September 1 order. On October 4, 2022, the Magistrate Judge 

issued findings and conclusions, recommending that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without 

prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Doc. 10.) 

Most recently, on November 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (Doc. 11.) 

The amended complaint is short, only about half a page of handwriting on the court-approved 

form. The handwriting on the amended complaint form is very difficult to read. The Court can 

discern that Plaintiff claims that “Wells Fargo Inc cut off [his] credit card.” Id. at 1. He also 

mentions a “Revocation of License.” Id. Plaintiff also claims that “James Finley[‘s] cellphone 

[sic] [was] stolen.” Id. In addition to the amended complaint form, Plaintiff has included notes 

from a medical doctor’s visit where he was treated for a cough. He has also included two 

Case 3:22-cv-01922-E-BT Document 13 Filed 01/05/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 118
2

handwritten references to Bible verses. In a handwritten attachment, Plaintiff refers to “Internal 

Affairs treason Joe Bidden [sic].” Id. at 16. Plaintiff has also attached an article on U.S. 

Representative Pete Sessions. Last, he has included two tables outlining the outstanding U.S. 

Mortgage Debt and Family Mortgage Debt. The Court concludes that Plaintiff’s amended 

complaint, like his complaint, is legally deficient. Specifically, it fails to comply with Rule 8(a). 

Plaintiff’s claims cannot be discerned, and this case cannot be screened. 

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and 

the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge dated October 4, 2022, 

the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and 

they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, 

THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

SO ORDERED: January 5, 2023

Case 3:22-cv-01922-E-BT Document 13 Filed 01/05/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 119