alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00228-L

§

DEMONTRE ANTWON HACKWORTH §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

DEMONTRE ANTWON HACKWORTH, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 

(5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) One

of the Indictment After cautioning and examining DEMONTRE ANTWON HACKWORTH under oath concerning each 

of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the 

offense(s) charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I 

therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that DEMONTRE ANTWON HACKWORTH be adjudged 

guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(1)(A), 923(a), and 924(a)(1)(D), namely, Dealing in Firearms Without a License and have 

sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: 10th day of January, 2023 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service 

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District 

Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 28 Filed 01/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 87
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 248 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 248

   Entitled the ``Citizen's Tax Protection Amendment'', proposing an 
    amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 
                         retroactive taxation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1993

Mr. Royce introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Entitled the ``Citizen's Tax Protection Amendment'', proposing an 
    amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 
                         retroactive taxation.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Congress shall pass no law increasing taxes or fees which takes 
effect prior to its enactment.''.

                                 <all>
```
p. 1



# OAR Box 1132 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 9 ) II-C-6 Docket Number: 

# A-86-0 3

Printed 4/18/20082:24:46

PM Sheet 9of 122P. 2 

## fl-U-03 JL-C-i A UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIONAGENCY WASHINGTON

. D.C. 20460 

## AP R20198 7
Honorabl e Bery l Anthony , Jr . OFFICEO F Hous e o f Representative s AI RAN D RADIATIO

N Washington , D C 2051 5
Dea r Mr . Anthony : Than k yo u fo r you r lette r outlinin g you r concern s wit hlo w sulfu r diese l fuel . EP Ai s presentl ystudyin g th e cost s an d benefit s o f lowsulfu r diese l fuel , bu t ha s no t propose d any rule s relate d t o fue l sulfu r leve l t o date . Provision s t o reduc e sulfu r level s hav e appeare d i nsevera l aci d rai nbill s introduce d i n Congress . Also , i nrespons e t o potentia l Congressiona l and/o r EP Aactio no nsulfu r levels , th e Nationa l Petroleum

Refiner' s Associatio n(NPRA ) conducte d a nationwid e surve yo f thei r member s (whic hwoul d hav e include d thos e i n Arkansas ) fo r th e purpos e o f assessin g th e cost s o f complyin g wit hlowe r sulfu r levels . Th e surve yprobabl ytriggere d th e letter s t o you , eve nthoug ha t thi s poin t thi s EP Aprojec t i s stil l i nth e studystage . Th e benefit s fro mreducin g diese l fue l sulfu r level s . (whic hi nth e absenc e o f requirements , ar e expecte d t o increas e ove r th e lon g term ) ar e reduce d emission s o f sulfu r dioxid e and sulfat e aerosol , a s wel l a s reduce d formation s o f a atmosphericall yproduce d sulfat e and sulfuri c aci d whic h contribut e t o precipitation
. Reduce d fue l sulfu r level s ma y als o reduc e diese l vehicl e costs , sinc e the yma yallo wth e us e o f les s costl ycomplianc e approache s t o mee t mor e stringent , 199 1 and 199 4 heavy-dut ydiese l particulat e emissio n standards . counterbalancin g thes e benefit s i s primaril ya refiner ycost , whic hmayb e large r (pe r gallon ) fo r a smal l refiner ytha nfo r a larg e one . W e ar e lookin g a t thi s caref-liy , and wil l conside r th e impact s o nsmal l refiner s whe n makin g a decisio nabou t sulfu r level s i ndiese l fuel . W e wil l als o b e considerin g anyimpact s a reduce d sulfu r requiremen t wil l hav e o n domesti c versu s impor t oi l productio nand refining
. Again , thank yo u fo r expressin g you r concerns . Sincerel yyours , 

### ORIGINAL-SIGNEDB Y RICHAR D0 . WILSO N Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s
From: Susan Miller [ mailto:SMiller@bia.org ]

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 12:42 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Subject: RE: Call tomorrow

For you r records, people who will be on the call today:

John Sanders, National Brick Research Center

Garth Tayler, Acme Brick

Warren Paschal, General Shale

Terry Schimmel, Boral Brick

Susan Miller, BIA

Paul Regina, BIA

We will talk to you soon.

susan

From: Ni zich, Sharon [ mailto:Nizich.Sharon@epa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:03 AM

To: Susan Miller

Subject: RE: Call tomorrow

Ok!

Sharon Nizich

Environmental Engineer

U.S. EPA/OAR/OAQPS

Sector Policies and Programs Division (SPPD)

109 TW Alexander Dr. (D243

- 04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541

- 2825

– Office

(919) 541

- 5450

– FaxFrom: Susan Miller [mailto:SMiller@bia.org]

Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 7:26 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon <Nizich.Sharon@epa.gov>

Cc: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>; Sroka, Kristin <ksroka@rti.org>; Holloway,

Thomas C. (Tom) <tcholloway@rti.org>

Subject: RE: Call tomorrow

Garth, Terry and I are all at Clemson at a meeting. We will be calling in.

From: Nizich, Sharon [ mailto:Nizich.Sharon@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:18 PM

To: Susan Miller

Cc: Gabrielle; Kristin Sroka; Tom Holloway

Subject: Call tomorrow

Hello Susan

- I am just checking to see if you are coming in, or if you are calling in, tomorrow. Thanks.

Sharon Nizich

Environmental Engineer

U.S. EPA/OAR/OAQPS

Sector Policies and Programs Division (SPPD)

109 TW Alexander Dr. (D243

- 04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541

- 2825

– Office

(919) 541

- 5450

– Fax
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DOMINIC LINDSEY, §

 Petitioner, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-cv-01718-M (BT)

§

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent.

§

§

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has taken under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated November 29, 2022. The Court has 

reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error and has found none. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

SO ORDERED this 27th day of December, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-01718-M-BT Document 9 Filed 12/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
Week End

Hours 

Worked

Texas Min. 

Wage

Unpaid 

Wages

Damages with 

Liquidation

9/7/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

9/14/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

9/21/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

9/28/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

10/5/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

10/12/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

10/19/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

10/26/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

11/2/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

11/9/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

11/16/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

11/23/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

11/30/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

12/7/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

12/14/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

12/21/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

12/28/20 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

1/4/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

1/11/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

1/18/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

1/25/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

2/1/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

2/8/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

2/15/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

2/22/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

3/1/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

3/8/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

3/15/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

3/22/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

3/29/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

4/5/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

4/12/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

4/19/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

4/26/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

5/3/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

5/10/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

5/17/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

5/24/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

5/31/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

6/7/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

6/14/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

6/21/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

6/28/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

7/5/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

7/12/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

7/19/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

7/26/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

8/2/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

8/9/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

8/16/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

8/23/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

8/30/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

9/6/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

9/13/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

9/20/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

9/27/21 100 $ 7.25 $ 942.50 $ 1,885.00

$ 52,780.00 $ 105,560.00

Case 3:22-cv-01751-S Document 28-2 Filed 08/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 104
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement  dated as  of April 1, 2015,by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Park Bridge LenderServices LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, asTrustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C22 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.       A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1125]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: 

*Whereas,*                     the Puerto Rico Exports Development Corporation, grantee of FTZ 61, has requested authority on behalf of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Quimica de Puerto Rico, Inc. (Merck), to add capacity and to expand the scope of manufacturing authority under zone procedures within Subzone 61D at the Merck plant in Arecibo, Puerto Rico (FTZ Docket 49-2000, filed 8/10/00);                 

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (65 FR 51293, 8/23/00);                

*Whereas,*                     pursuant to 15 CFR 400.32(b)(1), the Commerce Department's Assistant Secretary for Import Administration has the authority to act for the Board in making such decisions on manufacturing authority when the proposed activity is the same, in terms of products involved, to activity recently approved by the Board and similar in circumstances (15 CFR 400.32(b)(1)(i)); and,                 

*Whereas,*                     the FTZ staff has reviewed the proposal, taking into account the criteria of 15 CFR 400.31 and 400.32, and the Executive Secretary has recommended approval;                 

*Now, Therefore,*                     the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, acting for the Board pursuant to 15 CFR 400.32(b)(1), concurs in the recommendation and hereby approves the request subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 15 CFR 400.28.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of November 2000. 

Troy H. Cribb, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Dennis Puccinelli,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29633 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

RANDY ALAN HUSTON,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-cv-745-P

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In this case, Plaintiff has filed a civil case with a complaint and a 

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1-2. The case 

was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey 

L. Cureton, for submission to this Court of findings, conclusions and 

recommendations (“FCRs”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On 

September 15, 2022, Judge Cureton submitted Findings and 

Conclusions. See ECF No. 8. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate 

Judge’s FCR is ripe for review. 

The undersigned reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the 

undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions 

of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Thus, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Conclusions as its own. Accordingly, 

the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The 

Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed 

without further notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) if 

Plaintiff fails to pay to the clerk of Court the filing and administrative 

fees of $402.00 by October 7, 2022. 

SO ORDERED on this 30th day of September 2022.

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00745-P Document 9 Filed 09/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 34
April 19, 2017

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | First Mining Finance Corp. (the
      Company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                      
|    | Consent of Expert                               
|    |                                                 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by
reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2016.

I, Adrian Dance, Ph.D., P.Eng. of SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.,
hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my
involvement in the preparation of the following technical report:

Preliminary Economic Assessment for
the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada dated October 7, 2016 (the
Technical Report).

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ Adrian Dance, Ph.D., P.Eng.Adrian Dance, Ph.D., P.Eng.Principal ConsultantSRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing VIII, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jared S. Thear, Chief Financial Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/s/ Jared S. Thear


Jared S. Thear


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)


March 14, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1984-056 Wisconsin; Project No. 11162-002 Wisconsin]


Wisconsin River Power Company, Wisconsin Power and Light Company; 
Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Assessment

November 8, 2000.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for new major license 
for the Petenwell and Castle Rock Hydroelectric Project located on the 
Wisconsin River in Wood, Juneau, and Adams Counties near Necedah, 
Wisconsin, and the application for original major license for the 
Prairie du Sac Hydroelectric Project located on the Wisconsin River in 
Sauk and Columbia Counties near Prairie du Sac, Wisconsin.
    On June 23, 1998, the Commission staff issued a Draft Environmental 
Assessment (DEA) for the proposed licensing actions and requested that 
comments be filed with the Commission within 45 days. Comments on the 
DEA were filed and are addressed in the Final Environmental Assessment 
(FEA) for the proposed licensing actions.
    The FEA contains the staff's analysis of the potential 
environmental impacts of the proposed licenses, and concludes that the 
approval of the proposed licenses, with appropriate environmental 
protective measures, would not constitute major federal actions that 
would significantly affected the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. These filings may also be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (please call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29202 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M