alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29874]



[[Page 70355]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6905-7]


Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement; request for public 
comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as 
amended (``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed settlement agreement in the following case: Earth Island 
Institute v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Civ. No. 00-1065 
(D.C. Cir.). This action was filed pursuant to section 307(b) of the 
Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b), contesting EPA's final regulations for New 
Marine Compression-Ignition Engines at or Above 37kW. The final rules 
were issued under section 213(a)(3) of the Act and published at 64 FR 
73300 (December 29, 1999).

DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be 
received by December 22, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to Mark M. Kataoka, Air and 
Radiation Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460. Copies of the proposed settlement agreement are 
available from Phyllis J. Cochran, (202) 564-5566.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Earth Island Institute alleges in their 
lawsuit that EPA's final rule failed to establish emission standards 
for certain marine compression-ignition engines and thereby violated 
the Act. The proposed settlement agreement provides, in part, a 
schedule by which EPA will propose and take final action on a 
NO<INF>X</INF> emission standard for certain new marine compression-
ignition engines. The proposed settlement agreement also provides that 
if EPA accomplishes certain actions including the rulemaking described 
above, Earth Island Institute will agree to dismissal with prejudice of 
its petition for review.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to 
the proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as 
parties or interveners to the litigation in question. EPA or the 
Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed 
settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations 
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, 
or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the 
Department of Justice determine, following the comment period, that 
consent is inappropriate, the settlement agreement will then be 
executed by the parties.

    Dated: November 14, 2000.
Gary S. Guzy,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-29874 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
EX‐33.7
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 233-6440 |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

 REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA  For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank** (the "Servicer"). National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR''). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions"). NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole. Plante& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on 'the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.  National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer/s/ Lori D. EshooLori D. Eshoo, President/CEOJanuary 18, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 311 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 311

Designating October 1994 as ``National Breast Cancer Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1994

  Mrs. Collins of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Designating October 1994 as ``National Breast Cancer Awareness Month''.

Whereas breast cancer will strike an estimated 182,000 women and 1,000 men in 
        the United States in 1994;
Whereas the risk of developing breast cancer increases as a woman grows older;
Whereas breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, and 
        will kill an estimated 46,000 women and 300 men in 1994;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for localized breast cancer has risen from 78 
        percent in the 1940's to over 90 percent today;
Whereas most breast cancers are detected by the woman herself;
Whereas educating both the public and health care providers about the importance 
        of early detection will result in reducing breast cancer mortality;
Whereas appropriate use of screening mammography, in conjunction with clinical 
        examination and breast self-examination, can result in the detection of 
        many breast cancers early in their development and increase the survival 
        rate to nearly 100 percent;
Whereas data from controlled trials clearly demonstrate that deaths from breast 
        cancer are significantly reduced in women who have been screened by 
        mammography;
Whereas many women are reluctant to have screening mammograms for a variety of 
        reasons such as the cost of testing, lack of information, and fear;
Whereas access to screening mammography is directly related to socioeconomic 
        status;
Whereas increased awareness about the importance of screening mammography will 
        result in the procedure being regularly requested by the patient and 
        recommended by the health care provider; and
Whereas it is projected that more women will use this lifesaving test as it 
        becomes increasingly available and affordable: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 1994 is 
designated as ``National Breast Cancer Awareness Month'', and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe the month with 
appropriate programs and activities.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, S. James Miller, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB/A of ImageWare Systems, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.     The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

(a)   designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;

 

(b)   [Reserved]

 

(c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the smallbusiness issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(d)   disclosed in this report any change in thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors andthe audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: | July  22, 2005 |                     | /s/  S. James Miller |
|--------|----------------|--------------------------|----------------------|
|   |           | S.  James Miller         |
|   |           | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.



--------------------------------------------------------------------





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Andean Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended September 30, 2004,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Lance Larsen,  Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 1, 2004

/s/ Lance Larsen____________________________

Lance Larsen,

Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Digital Lifestyles Group, Inc. (the "COMPANY") does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2005 (the "REPORT") that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   August 10, 2006         By:      /s/ Andy Teng
                                          --------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Andy Teng
                                 Title:   Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                          Financial Officer and Chairman of
                                          the Board


     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 146

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States limiting

the number of consecutive years a person may serve in or be employed

by the Government of the United States or be employed to affect the

policies and programs of the Government of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States limiting the number of consecutive years a person

may serve in or be employed by the Government of

the United States or be employed to affect the policies

and programs of the Government of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all
2

HJ 146 IH

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

3 States within 7 years after the date of its submission for

4 ratification:

5 ‘‘ARTICLE—

6 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person may serve as a Representa7 tive or Senator for more than twelve years unless there

8 is an abeyance of the service of no less than four consecu9 tive years.

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person employed by the executive

11 branch of the Government may be stationed within the

12 District of Columbia metropolitan area for more than

13 twelve years unless there is an abeyance of the employ14 ment of no less than four consecutive years.

15 ‘‘SECTION 3. No person may be employed by the Con16 gress for more than twelve years unless there is an abey17 ance of the employment of no less than four consecutive

18 years.

19 ‘‘SECTION 4. No person may be employed for the pur20 pose of affecting the consideration or passage of legislation

21 by the Congress or the implementation of legislation by

22 the executive branch of the Government for more than

23 twelve years unless there is an abeyance of the employ24 ment of no less than four consecutive years.
3

HJ 146 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 5. No person may serve any term or por2 tion thereof as a Representative or Senator, nor shall said

3 person be employed by the Congress or employed for the

4 purpose of affecting the consideration or passage of legis5 lation by the Congress or the implementation of legislation

6 by the executive branch of the Government for more than

7 twelve years cumulatively unless there is an abeyance of

8 the service or employment of no less than four consecutive

9 years.

10 ‘‘SECTION 6. For the purposes of this article, service

11 or employment which commenced before ratification of

12 this article may not be included in determining the num13 ber of years served or employed.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Murdakes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ James Murdakes
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        James Murdakes
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        April 29, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00085-Z-BR

§

ELIOSBETH ROJAS (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

ELIOSBETH ROJAS (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining ELIOSBETH ROJAS (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that ELIOSBETH ROJAS (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 1708 - POSSESSION OF STOLEN 

MAIL MATTER and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☒ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☒ The Government does not oppose release.

☒ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☒ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: February 8, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00085-Z-BR Document 40 Filed 02/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 91
Page 1 of 2

Diby Ako v. Arriva Best Security, Inc., et al.

U.S.D.C. (N.D. Tex.) Case No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default Regarding Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DIBY AKO PLAINTIFF

vs. No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

ARRIVA BEST SECURITY, INC., DEFENDANTS

and AMOIFO KOFFI

 

MOTION FOR CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

REGARDING DEFENDANT ARRIVA BEST SECURITY, INC.

Plaintiff Diby Ako, by and through his undersigned counsel, for his Motion for 

Clerk’s Entry of Default Regarding Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc. (hereinafter 

“Defendant”), he does hereby state and allege as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed his Original Complaint against Defendants on August 11, 2022. 

See ECF No. 1. 

2. Plaintiff served Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc., a summons and copy 

of the Complaint on March 18, 2023. See ECF No. 19. 

3. Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc.’s deadline for filing and serving an 

Answer or Motion to Dismiss was April 10, 2023. 

4. Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc. has not filed or served an Answer or 

Motion to Dismiss in accordance with Rule 12(a)(1). See Declaration of Josh Sanford ¶ 

4, Exhibit 1 hereto.

5. No extension for Defendant to file or serve a proper Answer or Motion to 

Dismiss has been requested or granted. Id. at ¶ 5.

Case 3:22-cv-01751-S Document 25 Filed 08/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 89
Page 2 of 2

Diby Ako v. Arriva Best Security, Inc., et al.

U.S.D.C. (N.D. Tex.) Case No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default Regarding Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc.

6. Defendant is in default, and the Clerk should enter its default as mandated 

by Rule 55(a). 

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff Diby Ako respectfully requests that 

the Clerk enter the default of Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc., for attorney’s fees and 

costs incurred herein, and for all other good and proper relief to which he may be entitled, 

whether or not specifically requested herein.

Respectfully submitted,

PLAINTIFF DIBY AKO

SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC

Kirkpatrick Plaza

10800 Financial Centre Parkway, Suite 510

Little Rock, Arkansas 72211

Telephone: (501) 221-0088

Facsimile: (888) 787-2040

/s/ Josh Sanford

Josh Sanford

Tex. Bar No. 24077858

josh@sanfordlawfirm.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned counsel, do hereby certify that on the date imprinted by the 

CM/ECF system, a copy of the foregoing MOTION was filed via the CM/ECF system, 

which will provide notice to all interested parties. Notice has been delivered by other 

means to:

Arriva Best Security Inc.

c/o Aimee Koffee

5482 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 219

Los Angeles, CA 90036

Amoifo Koffee

9955 Durant Drive, Unit 304

Beverley Hills, CA 90212

/s/ Josh Sanford

 Josh Sanford

Case 3:22-cv-01751-S Document 25 Filed 08/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 90