alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1.                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 1, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham    |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                 |   | Steven C. Oldham,       |
|                 |   | President and           |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certificateis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit tothe Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

----
### Good Neighbor Environmental Board **The US Grant Hotel 326 Broadway**  **San Diego, California 92101**  **619/232 -** **3121** 

### AGENDA **Thursday, June 16** 8 :0 0 a.m . **Registration** 8 :3 0 - 9:00 **Welcome and Introductions**
 **Mark Joyce** Associate Director and Acting Designated Federal Officer Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach
 **Cynthia Jones -** 

**Jackson** Acting Director Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach
 **Diane Austin** Acting Chair Good Neighbor Environmental Board 9:00 - 10:30 **Envir onmental Impacts of Renewable Energy Development in the** 

**US -** **Mexico Border Region**
 **Donna Tisdale** Secretary Protect our Communities Foundation
 **Pablo Gutierrez** Geothermal Program Technical Lead California Energy Commission **Bill Powers** Powers Engineering 1 0:30 - 10:45 **Break** 10:45 - 12:15 **Economic Benefits of Renewable Energy Development in the US -**  **Mexico**

**Border Region**
 **Lisa Bicker** President and CEO Clean TECH San Diego
 **Kathy MacDougall** Director of Human Resources Independent Energy Solutions , Inc.
 **Nicole Capr etz**  Director Green Energy/Green Jobs Campaign Environmental Health Coalition 12 : 15 - 12: 45 **Public Comments**  12 : 45 -2:00 **Lunch** 2:0 0 -3: 00 **Policy Issues Associated with the Development of Renewable Energy in**

**the US -** **Mexico Border Region**
 **Andrew McAllister** D irector of Policy and Strategy California Center for Sustainable Energy
 **Andy Horne** Deputy County Executive Officer Natural Resources Development 3: 0 0 -3: 1 5 **Break**3:15 -4:00 **Update on Cross -** **B ord**  **er Electricity Task F orce**  **and Other I ssues**   Georgina Sc arlata Border Affairs Officer U.S. Department of State
 Chris topher Lawrence Electricity Industry Specialist U.S. Department of Energy
 Rick Van Schoik, Director North American Center for Transborder Studies Arizona State University 4:00 - 6:0 0 **Discussion of 14**  **th Report**  6 : 0 0 **Adjourn** 

## Meeting Day **2 Friday, June 17**  8:30 - 9:3 0 **Discussion of Next Meetings and Other Business** 
 Las Cruces, NM – September  Washington, DC - D ecember 9:30 - 11:00 **Discussion of 14**  **th Report**  11:00 - 11:15 **Break** 11:15 - 1:30 **Discus sion**  **of 14 th**  **Report** 1 :30 -2 :00 **Public Comments** 2 :00 **Adjourn**
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 236 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 160

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 236

                          [Report No. 103-510]

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 18, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                House Calendar No.  160
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 236

                          [Report No. 103-510]

Authorizing the 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1994

Mr. Traficant submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                              May 18, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 20, 1994, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
jointly designate, the 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.
```
#### DURAN v. STATE.

No. 21933.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1942.

Paul Petty, of Ballinger, and E. H. Swaim, of Eden, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with an assault to murder upon Solomon Duran, her husband, and by the jury convicted of an assault to murder with malice, and her punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The facts relied upon by the State show an unprovoked attempt to kill the prosecuting witness by shooting him in the head with a pistol by appellant. She claimed self-defense. It is shown that appellant and her husband had not lived in harmony for quite awhile, and that they had each been guilty of violence or attempted violence, upon the other. At the time in-question the parties were not living together, and appellant seemed desirous of having the beneficiary changed in an insurance policy upon her- life. She contacted her husband and his sister at a filling station near Paint Rock, and requested the husband to sign a certain document. He came up to the car where appellant was and signed such paper. The husband then got back in his car, at which time appellant took a pistol out of her purse and shot him in the head behind the ear. The injured man then got out of the truck, knocked the appellant down and took the pistol away from her. These facts seem to be sufficient to establish the charge in the indictment. Appellant’s plea of self-defense was evidently rejected by the jury.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 5:22-cr-00074-H-BQ Document 163 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 312
Case 5:22-cr-00074-H-BQ Document 163 Filed 12/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 313
## Petition for exemption 14 CFR part 21

Greg Priest 3874 Camellia Dr ive Mobile Al, 36693 (251)680

- 6830 Gpriest65@gmail.com

Seeking exemption from 14 CFR part 21, subpart H; and Sections 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). part 21, Certification procedures for products and pa rts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates. I would like to use a small hex copter, in my startup business for Aerial real estate photography and land survey . In the course of operating my hex copter I have been contacted by individuals inquiring the availa bility of my equipment to video property or properties they have listed on various real estate sites. I see the future of UAS based businesses growing rapidly, and would like to be a part of this growing aviation sector. With the rapidly accelerating cost of aircraft rental and safety concerns, I feel that the UAS is a viable alternative and more cost effective way to provide a service in an ever expanding field. Current aerial video and photography projects require the hire of full size aircraft at a consi derably higher level of risk and cost . The equipment I will be using weighs less than 5lbs and has various safety systems and overrides that in the event of loss of signal , guarantee that the aircraft return to the point of launch and safely land. Also , th e equipment weighs considerably less than traditional aircraft and crew. As a former student pilot who worked toward my private pilot license , this allows me to get back into aviation in a new technology that I also hope will led to my eventual private pil ot certification. As a student pilot I logged more than forty hours in small single engine aircraft. I understand the safety procedures and how important check lists and well maintained aircraft are for public safety. When I fly my UAS I always abide by al l FAA regulations. I take this as a future business very seriously. The equipment I am using is maintained to the highest standards. I do preflight checks on batteries, airframe, motors and all equipment associated with my aircraft. I do limit my flights to below 400 feet AGL and within line of sight. My UAS is equipped with an auto pilot system in the event of loss of signal or loss of sight. The UAS is also equipped with an FPV camera that can be used in the event there is an emergency situation or disor ientation. P lease consider granting this exemption I would greatly appreciate the consideration.

Sincerely Greg Priest
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 7/9/2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Joe Bryson, EPA

SUBJECT: 7/9/2014, APPA Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendee listed below on 7/9/2014 to discuss 

the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Joe Bryson, CPPD OAP OAR EPA

Tanzina Islam, APPA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DARVIS LAKEITH ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

VS.

CONTESSA SMITH and

JOYCE ROBBINS,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-1642-G-BH

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,*

in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the

opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and

they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the court.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of

the United States Magistrate Judge, by separate judgment, the plaintiff’s official

capacity claims against the defendants will be DISMISSED without prejudice for

* No objections were filed.

Case 3:22-cv-01642-G-BH Document 19 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 127
lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the plaintiff’s claim for habeas relief will be

DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 

SO ORDERED.

December 1, 2023.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

- 2 -

Case 3:22-cv-01642-G-BH Document 19 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 128
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         763,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,199,175
<PP&E>                                       2,125,872
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,120,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,532,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,018,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,741
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,388,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,532,855
<SALES>                                        743,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               743,336
<CGS>                                          381,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,934,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,513,009
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (59,389)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,513,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,513,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,513,009)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.89)
        

</TABLE>
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 120

To designate March 20, 1993, as ‘‘National Quilting Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mrs. BENTLEY (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. FROST, Mr.

MURTHA, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. HYDE, Mr. KASICH, Mr. LEACH, Mr.

MCDADE, Mr. RAVENEL, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. GILLMOR) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate March 20, 1993, as ‘‘National Quilting Day’’.

Whereas quiltmaking is an ancient art form which has

evolved in the United States to become instantly recognizable as an American folk art;

Whereas quiltmaking serves the needs of many people and

has been the stimulus for social gatherings which promote sharing, friendship, and mutual support;

Whereas quilting is often representative of the social, religious, or political convictions of the maker;
2

HJ 120 IH

Whereas quiltmakers have provided comfort and warmth to

generations of loved ones, the ill, and the unfortunate

through the gift of quilts; and

Whereas recognition is due to all of the quiltmakers in this

Nation who share their creativity, time, and talents to

the benefit of mankind, thus preserving a part of our

American heritage: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That March 20, 1993, is designated as ‘‘National Quilting

4 Day’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

5 a proclamation calling on the people of the United States

6 to observe such day with appropriate programs, cere7 monies, and activities.

Æ
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 228

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13, 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Committee discharged

JOINT RESOLUTION

To approve the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

with respect to the products of Romania.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress approves the extension of nondiscrim4 inatory treatment with respect to the products of Romania
2

•HJ 228 CDS

1 transmitted by the President to the Congress on July 2,

2 1993.

Passed the House of Representatives October 12,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Case 1:22-cr-00010-H-BU Document 23 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 43
Case 1:22-cr-00010-H-BU Document 23 Filed 08/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 44
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MICHAEL L. MACIAS,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent

______________________ 

2016-2508

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF-0752-15-0385-I-2.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID PAUL CLISHAM, Clisham & Sortor, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner. Also represented by JUSTINE 

LIV CLISHAM. 

 RETA EMMA BEZAK, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented 

by REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR.,

CHAD A. READLER. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 24, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Petition for exemption 14 CFR part 21

Greg Priest

3874 Camellia Drive

Mobile Al, 36693

(251)680-6830

Gpriest65@gmail.com

Seeking exemption from 14 CFR part 21, subpart H; and Sections 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 

91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). part 21, 

Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates.

I would like to use a small hex copter, in my startup business for Aerial real estate photography and land 

survey. In the course of operating my hex copter I have been contacted by individuals inquiring the 

availability of my equipment to video property or properties they have listed on various real estate sites.

I see the future of UAS based businesses growing rapidly, and would like to be a part of this growing 

aviation sector.

With the rapidly accelerating cost of aircraft rental and safety concerns, I feel that the UAS is a viable 

alternative and more cost effective way to provide a service in an ever expanding field.

Current aerial video and photography projects require the hire of full size aircraft at a considerably 

higher level of risk and cost. The equipment I will be using weighs less than 5lbs and has various safety 

systems and overrides that in the event of loss of signal, guarantee that the aircraft return to the point 

of launch and safely land. Also, the equipment weighs considerably less than traditional aircraft and 

crew.

As a former student pilot who worked toward my private pilot license, this allows me to get back into 

aviation in a new technology that I also hope will led to my eventual private pilot certification. As a 

student pilot I logged more than forty hours in small single engine aircraft. I understand the safety 

procedures and how important check lists and well maintained aircraft are for public safety. When I fly 

my UAS I always abide by all FAA regulations. I take this as a future business very seriously. 

The equipment I am using is maintained to the highest standards. I do preflight checks on batteries,

airframe, motors and all equipment associated with my aircraft. I do limit my flights to below 400 feet 

AGL and within line of sight. My UAS is equipped with an auto pilot system in the event of loss of signal 

or loss of sight. The UAS is also equipped with an FPV camera that can be used in the event there is an 

emergency situation or disorientation. Please consider granting this exemption I would greatly 

appreciate the consideration.

Sincerely

Greg Priest
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 381

To designate May 1995 ‘‘Multiple Sclerosis Association of America Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 21, 1994

Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate May 1995 ‘‘Multiple Sclerosis Association of

America Month’’.

Whereas, in 1995, the Multiple Sclerosis Association of

America will observe its 25th year of service to individuals suffering from multiple sclerosis, and their families;

Whereas over 500,000 individuals in the United States suffer

from multiple sclerosis or other neurological disorders;

Whereas no cause, cure, or prevention for multiple sclerosis

has yet been discovered;

Whereas the goals of the Multiple Sclerosis Association of

America are to enhance the quality of life for multiple

sclerosis sufferers and their families, and to promote, ex-
2

•HJ 381 IH

pand, and encourage public awareness and knowledge regarding the needs and daily concerns of individuals suffering from multiple sclerosis; and

Whereas members of the Multiple Sclerosis Association of

America and their families are provided, free of charge,

with a toll-free hotline, peer counseling, educational information, treatment referrals, loans of therapeutic equipment, barrier-free housing facilities, a bimonthly newsletter, and, through technology developed by the National

Aeronautics and Space Administration, a protective suit

designed to cool the body temperature of individuals suffering from multiple sclerosis in order to help restore

demyelinated nerves: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That—

4 (1) May 1995 is designated ‘‘Multiple Sclerosis

5 Association of America Month’’; and

6 (2) the President is authorized and requested to

7 issue a proclamation—

8 (A) calling on the people of the United

9 States to observe May 1995 with appropriate

10 ceremonies and activities; and

11 (B) urging appropriate Federal agencies,

12 and interested organizations, groups, and indi13 viduals, whenever possible, to promote the fact

14 that the Multiple Sclerosis Association of Amer15 ica provides free services which are designed to
3

•HJ 381 IH

1 assist individuals suffering from multiple sclero2 sis and their families and to assist the Multiple

3 Sclerosis Association of America achieve its goal

4 of providing a higher standard of living for all

5 Americans afflicted with multiple sclerosis.

Æ