alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 43 1- CR Jose L uis LOP EZ , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 186th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CR7705B Honora ble Maria T ere sa He rr, Judge Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 26, 2009 DI SMI SSED The trial c ourt’s ce rtification in this appea l states t hat t he case is a “plea-ba rg ain ca se, and the def endant ha s NO rig ht of appe al.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Te x as Rules of Appe lla te Proce dure provides, “[t]he appea l must be dismissed if a ce rtification that shows the de fenda nt has a rig ht of appea l has not been ma de par t of the re cord unde r these r ules.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).04
- 09
- 00 43 1- CR

- 2- Appellant’s c ounsel has filed w ritten notice with thi s co u rt that counsel ha s review ed the
rec ord and “ca

n find no rig ht of appe al for A ppellant.” We construe this noti ce a s an indication that appellant will not seek to file a n amende d tri al co u rt cer tification showing that he has the rig ht of appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( d) ; 37 .1 ; se e als o D an ie ls v . S tat e , 1 1 0 S. W. 3 d 1 7 4 , 1 77 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 20 0 3 , n o p et.). I n light of the rec ord pre sented, we ag ree with appellant’s
c ou ns e l th a t Ru le 25 .2 (d ) requi res th is c ou rt to d ism iss thi s a

pp e a l. A c c or din g ly , th is a pp e a l is dismiss ed. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WALKER WINGSAIL AMERICA, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000942652
<NAME>                  WALKER WINGSAIL AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          2
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      65
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                        (76)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        65
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (6)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (6)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (6)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 263 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.Con.Res.263
                                           Agreed to June 30, 1994      

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, June 
30, 1994, it stand adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, July 12, 
1994, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Thursday, June 30, 1994, Friday, July 1, 
1994, Saturday, July 2, 1994, or Sunday, July 3, 1994, pursuant to a 
motion made by the majority leader or his designee, in accordance with 
this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 
July 11, 1994, or at such time on that day as may be specified by the 
majority leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2015, by andamong J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2015-C29 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# Official Journal C 277/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 277 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5131 October 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 277

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5131 October 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 277/01 | Final accounts for the financial year 2007 of the 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds | 1 |
| 2008/C 277/02 | Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2007 | 243 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 277/01

Final accounts for the financial year 2007 of the 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds

1

2008/C 277/02

Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors on the 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2007

243

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 277/03 | Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2008/C 277/03

Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: September 4, 2019

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960 

Readout of Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting

Washington – U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive session at the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury (Treasury). 

The Council discussed the development of its 2019 annual report and potential amendments to its 

interpretive guidance on nonbank financial company designations.

The Council also heard a presentation from staff at the Board of Governors of the Federal 

Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board), the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the 

Conference of State Bank Supervisors regarding the growth of nonbank mortgage origination 

and servicing and potential related risks. 

In addition, the Council received an update from staff at Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board, 

and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission regarding the transition from the London 

Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) to alternative reference rates, including the Secured Overnight

Financing Rate (SOFR). Council members discussed existing efforts related to this transition 

and emphasized the importance of further attention by market participants and regulators to

address any risks to the financial system that may arise related to LIBOR.

The Council also voted to approve its fiscal year 2020 budget and the minutes of its previous 

meeting on May 30, 2019. 

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, its meeting minutes, and its budget is 

available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

 

ROBERT L. KIRKLAND, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-759-O-BP

 § 

COMMISSIONER OF §

SOCIAL SECURITY, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to pay Plaintiff Joseph Lee Aronson, in care of 

Howard D. Olinsky, an attorney, Olinsky Law Group, 250 S. Clinton St., Ste. 210, Syracuse, NY 

13202, fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the agreed upon, reduced total amount of 

$10,814.14 for 2.2 hours of attorney services in 2022 at a rate of $234.14 per hour and for 41.3 

hours in 2023 at a rate of $243.54 per hour and for 5.6 hours of paralegal services in 2022 and 2.5 

hours in 2023 at a rate of $100.00 per hour in each year.

SO ORDERED this 7

th day of September 2023.

Case 4:22-cv-00759-O Document 29 Filed 09/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3377
Motion for Detention - Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RAYNALDO RIVERA ORTIZ JR.

NO.

MOTION FOR DETENTION

The United States moves for detention of defendant, Raynaldo Rivera Ortiz Jr., 

pursuant to Crim. Rule 5(d)(3) and 18 U.S.C. §3142. 

1. Eligibility of Case. This case is eligible for a detention order because the case

involves (check all that apply): 

 Crime of violence (18 U.S.C. §3156); 

 X Maximum sentence life imprisonment or death 

(see 18 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(2)) 

10 + year drug offense 

Felony, with two prior convictions in above categories 

X Serious risk defendant will flee

Serious risk obstruction of justice 

Felony involving a minor victim 

 Felony involving a firearm, destructive device, or any other 

dangerous weapon

Felony involving a failure to register (18 U.S.C. § 2250) 

3:22-mj-00884-BK-1

Case 3:22-mj-00884-BK Document 3 Filed 09/13/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 22
Motion for Detention - Page 2

2. Reason for Detention. The Court should detain defendant because there are no

conditions of release which will reasonably assure (check one or both):

X Defendant’s appearance as required

X Safety of any other person and the community

3. Rebuttable Presumption. The United States will invoke the rebuttable

presumption against defendant because (check one or both):

Probable cause to believe defendant committed 10+ year drug

offense or firearms offense, 18 U.S.C.§924(c)

Probable cause to believe defendant committed a federal crime of

terrorism, 18 U.S.C. §2332b(g)(5)

Probable cause to believe defendant committed an offense involving

a minor, 18 U.S.C. §§1201, 2251

Previous conviction for “eligible” offense committed while on

pretrial bond

Probable cause to believe Defendant violated terms of

pretrial release, 18 U.S.C. § 3148.

4. Time For Detention Hearing. The United States requests the Court conduct the

detention hearing,

 X At first appearance

After continuance of ____days (not more than 3).

Case 3:22-mj-00884-BK Document 3 Filed 09/13/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 23
Motion for Detention - Page 3

DATED this 13th day of September, 2022.

Respectfully submitted, 

CHAD E. MEACHAM

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/ John J. de la Garza III

John J. de la Garza III

Assistant United States Attorney 

Texas State Bar Number 00796455

1100 Commerce Street, Third Floor 

Dallas, TX 75242-1699

Tel: (214) 659-8682; Fax: (214) 659-8805

Email: john.delagarza@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that true and correct copies of this document were served this day 

on counsel of record by electronically filing the document with the clerk of court for the

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas using the ECF system.

s/ John J. de la Garza III

John J. de la Garza III

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:22-mj-00884-BK Document 3 Filed 09/13/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 24
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 395

To proclaim August 9, 1994, as ‘‘Smokey Bear’s 50th Anniversary’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1994

Mr. DE LA GARZA (for himself, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROSE, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr. VENTO, and Mr. MILLER of California) introduced the following

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and

Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To proclaim August 9, 1994, as ‘‘Smokey Bear’s 50th

Anniversary’’.

Whereas Smokey Bear has served the United States of America for 50 years, preventing wildfires and protecting the

Nation’s forests, above and beyond the call of duty;

Whereas Smokey Bear has dedicated himself to educating

Americans of all ages and particularly America’s youth,

the future guardians of our forests, about forest fire

prevention;
2

HJ 395 IH

Whereas this Administration is committed to increasing public information and awareness about wildfire prevention

and forest protection;

Whereas this Administration is devoted to changing the

public’s behavior to prevent wildfires in an effort to

maintain and protect our Nation’s precious resources;

and

Whereas the United States Department of Agriculture Forest

Service, the National Association of State Foresters, and

the Advertising Council have provided extraordinary support and dedication to the purposes and efforts of

Smokey Bear: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That August 9, 1994, is designated as ‘‘Smokey Bear’s

4 50th Anniversary’’. The President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling the people of the

6 United States to observe this day with appropriate cere7 monies and activities.

Æ
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 326

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, OCTOBER 6), 1994

Received

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1995, as ‘‘National Good Teen

Day’’.

Whereas Salem City Schools in Salem, Ohio, have proclaimed

January 16, 1992, as ‘‘Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas both the United States Congress and the President

of the United States have proclaimed January 16, 1993,

and January 16, 1994, as ‘‘National Good Teen Day’’;

Whereas there are more than twenty-four million teenagers in

the United States according to the 1990 census;
2

HJ 326 RFS

Whereas our Nation’s teenagers represent an important part

of our society, and the many physical and emotional

changes and character-building experiences which teenagers go through are an important concern;

Whereas it is easy to stereotype teenagers as either those who

have problems or those who excel;

Whereas teenagers should not simply be recognized for their

intelligence, abilities, skills and talents, but rather for the

good which is inherent in all human beings;

Whereas as unique individuals, teenagers are encouraged to

esteem the good as well as the potential that is within

each of them;

Whereas a day should be created to focus on the positive

qualities in America’s youth; and

Whereas teenagers are the future of this great country: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That January 16, 1995, is designated ‘‘National Good

4 Teen Day,’’ and the President is authorized and requested

5 to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to observe such day by recognizing the teenagers

7 of the United States and by participating in appropriate

8 ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives September 30,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### J. F. SCHNEIDER *&*SONS, Inc. v. CITY OF MIDDLESBORO.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 5, 1953.

Robert J. Watson, Middlesboro, for appellant.

Arthur Rhorer and A. E. Funk, Jr., Mid-dlesboro, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

The City of Middlesboro instituted this action against J. F. Schneider and Sons to collect some $3,300 in ad valorem taxes. J. F. Schneider and Sons, a packing plant, resisted the action on the ground that the land on which the plant was located had been de-annexed from the city. In 1945, the city passed an ordinance designed to assist the Kentucky National Park Commission in acquiring land for the establishment of the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park. The ordinance recited that certain lands within the city limits, including the land of J. F. Schneider and Sons, were not necessary for the future expansion of the city. The Kentucky National Park Commission never acquired the land of J. F. Schneider and Sons. The appeal is from a judgment holding J. F. Schneider and Sons liable for taxes.

We believe this judgment is correct. The city ordinance was permissive in nature and it did not have the effect of placing the appellant’s land beyond the city limits. Had the Park Commission acquired the land for the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park, we would be confronted with an entirely different question.

Judgment affirmed.
OFFICE OF **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **aROVER**

**SELLERS AlToRNrv** 

**OarmIlL**

**lonolrble** Beyne Wtterfjeld, Cmniedoner TIremen'8Penmlon Coal scion P. a. BOX loat **Anntin,** Texee **Dear Mr.**  **Setterfieldr Opinion**  **no. 0-6583** 

**its entirety**  **em foY** 

y for l period of r3~ orgenleed fire **n this**  **stete now**  J comewithin theprorlslon~ of **rank, whether**  es **wholly** peid,pert **firemen, ehe11**  be entitled tobe rtm mob eenioe or department end mbell be entitled tobe peid from **the Ciremen** **’ s**  **Relief** end lletiremmt Fund of **thet** city or tom, e **month ly**  **peneion eqnel**  to **one-half** ofhia ererege **moath-** ]y salarynot toexoeed 8 mexlmm of One Hundred **bailers ($lOO.OO)**  **per month;**  **such averego**  **monthly** salary tobe based on themonthly ererege of hietlonoreble

Bayno Betterfield - pege 8

**celery** for **tbo** Tlro **(6) fear**  period **preoedlng the**  **date** of **mob** 

## rotirennt; **prorlded ibrtber,**  that if hiw areragemonthly celery ie **Plfty** DOllera ($60.00)or 1088 **pm-** month **or** If 8 volunteer **fire** man rlth no sale-. he shellbo entitled te 8

This Beotlon repeatsverbatim seotlon 6 of Chapter i23, **Acts** of **the Regular**  Session ot the 45th Loglsletnre, end adAs thatportion of the above quotation **which re**  **here** nnderecore& for canrenlenoe sake.

We think It is plaln from the speoillolanguage of **the** newly added **matter to**  **Seation 8**  **that the**  **T~ogisleture** lntended that **any** ellflble end quelif'ledfiremm, **who** shall **here** oompleted **twenty yeare**  **of** l **owioe hefore**  **reaohing** the age of flftpflre fears,would be entitled to **the** certlfleete showing suoh senioe, whether mob oospletion is **before** or after the effeotlre **date** of senateBill 89, provided it Is on or after ths 1st dar ofApril, A. lr.1839.

**In** your letter of **request** you **refer** ts SenateBill **No. 89**  sm beIn effeotlre **March** 23, 1946. Ke sell your ettentlcrnto the feat that rhlle the Billwas approved **Meroh 23,** Honorable Beyne 6etterfield - Pe6* 6

1946, end shllo it llterell~ arriem the emer6eaq oleuae, It didnot reoelrs the **neeerury** aeJorltyr end ~111 **beOwe** effeo**tire ninety**  dare lftw the adJournmeatof the preeent Le6leleture. 

# 7
816 

# ,

OS-Mn

.
# C_2012291EN.01001501.xml

| 27.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 14 December 2011

in Case E-3/11

Pálmi Sigmarsson v the Central Bank of Iceland

(Free movement of capital — Article 43 EEA — National restrictions on capital movements — Jurisdiction — Proportionality — Legal certainty)

2012/C 291/06

In Case E-3/11, Pálmi Sigmarsson v the Central Bank of Iceland — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavik District Court), concerning the interpretation of Article 43 of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Benedikt Bogason (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 14 December 2011, the operative part of which is as follows:

A national measure which prevents inbound transfer into Iceland of Icelandic krónur purchased on the offshore market, is compatible with Article 43(2) and (4) of the EEA Agreement in circumstances such as those in the case before the referring court.

---