### 1 DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR A NEW GUIDELINE



## Mysid Two

- Generation Test Guideline
April 2013

INTRODUCTION

1. This guideline describes a two

- generation test with an estuarine mysid that considers reproductive fitness in parents and offspring as an integrated measure of toxicant exposure. It also enables measurement of a suite of other endpoints that allow for diag nostic and definitive evaluation of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) or other types of reproductive toxicants (Verslycke et al 2004). This guideline is intende d to be applicable to the mysid

, Americamysis bahia , but could be adapted to other mysid sp ecies. The mysid two

generation test is a relatively long

- term (normally 60

- d or longer) assay that assesses early development, growth, and reproduction in two generations (F0 and F1). The two

- generation test described in this guideline

is an extension o f existing standard practice for conducting a mysid life

- cycle test (ASTM 2005 ; McKenney 1986, 1998 ; and Nimmo et al 1977, 1978).

2. The test is intended to serve as a definitive test with an aquatic arthropod for collecting

concentration

- response infor mation on adverse effects suitable for use in ecological risk assessment. Specifically, the design enables the collection of both organismal toxicity data and information concerning various aspects of the reproductive biology and life

- stage viability. The former is useful as a basis for better understanding comparative toxicological relationships across biological groups and/or extrapolation across species (McKenney 1986, 1996), while the latter are critical to application of population models to risk

asse ssment scenarios (Raimondo and McKenney 200 5 a,b).

3. The two

- generation test is initiated with newly

- released <24 hours old (F0 generation) offspring that are grown to maturity and then their offspring collected (F1 generation). T he F1 generation is also grown to maturity and their offspring enumerated (F2 generation). Development, sexual maturation, reproduction

, and growth are observed in the F0 and F1 generations. Measurements are made of a number of endpoints in both F0 and F1 generations reflective of functional endocrine regulation of development, growth

, and reproduction, including sex ratio, time to maturity, time to brood release

, and interbrood duration (which, when combined with growth rates, are reflective of the molting process).

PRINCIPLE OF THE TEST

An overview of the methodology and relevant test conditions is provided in Table 1 (Annex 1).

4. Parental mysid exposure (F0)

- For the recommended species ( Americamysis bahia ), the test protocol is initiated with healthy newly released mysids less than 24 hours old. The test is conducted with a minimum of five chemical concentrations, as well as appropriate controls, with a minimum of three experimental units (replicates) per treatment. In general, each replicate tank contains two rete ntion baskets , each holding 20 mysids per basket (one bas ket housing animals used for reproduction observations and a second basket for growth and optional biochemical measurements). With the appearance of a marsupial pouch on females,

mature females are isolated as pairs with males (smaller individuals without marsupial pouches ) in separate

### 2 brood cups. The exposure of these F0 mysids is terminated after the second brood release is complete ( or 7 days past the median second brood release in controls). Toxi cant and control treatments are delivered to the mysids in water which is delivered by a continuous flow apparatus (e.g.

, infusion pumps) (McKenney 1982) or

an exposure appa ratus using intermittent flow ( e.g., proportional diluter) (McKenney 1998). Daily observations are assessed and recorded for each individual on mortality, sex determination, reproductive condition of female (marsupial pouch with or without developing embryos)

, and number of young released in each of the first two broods. At weekly inte rvals (Day 7 and Day 14) animals from the growth basket s are subsampled for growth measurements (length and dry weight ; see section 34 for details )

.

5. F1 generation

– Offspring (F1) from the parental generation (F0) are collected each morning from the

br ood cups and transferred immediately to baskets ( labeled with the date), which are housed within separate tanks for each of the F0 exposure conditions. Optimally , two groups of 15 F1 juveniles are selected and maintained within separate baskets for each of the F0 exposure conditions (one housing animals used for reproduction observations and a second basket for growth and optional biochemical measurements).

Observations are assessed for each individual and recor ded daily on mortality, sex determination, reproductive condition of female (marsupial pouch with or without developing embryos)

, and number of young released in each of the first two broods. F1 adults may be discarded or saved for subsequent measurements (e.g., if stage

specific survival is measured for population modeling) after release of their second brood. At weekly intervals (Day 7 and Day 14) animals from the growth basket s are subsampled for growth measurements (length and dry weight)

.

DATA ENDPO INTS



### The test method includes study variables and biological endpoints which are recorded per mysid or composite of mysids, per breeding pair, or per replicate tank (i.e. growth or reproduction

basket ). These endpoints were divided among three categories :

(i) Study Parameters (F0, F1)

a. Study day

b. Exposure duration

c. Pairing day

(ii) Reproduction (F0, F1) (11)

d. Sex ratio (per tank; i.e. both growth and reproduction baskets )

e. Time to maturity ( per tank; i.e. both growth and reproduction baskets )

f. Time to first brood release (per breeding pair)

g. Time to second brood release (per breeding pair)

h. Interbrood duration, time between release of first and second brood (per breeding pair)

i. Number of young per female in the first brood (per breeding pair) j. Number of young per female in the second brood (per breeding pair)

k. Total number of young in the first two broods per female (per breeding pair)

l. Total number of offspring per female (per breeding pair)

m. Percentage of females that are reproductively active in the first two b roods (per breeding pairs )

n. Total reproduction days in the first two broods (per breeding pairs)

### 3 o. Sex ratio (per replicate tank)

p. Number of young per female per reproductive day in the first two brood (per breeding pair )

(ii i ) Survival (F0, F1) ( 10 ) 1

a. Survival rate for all animals including both the growth and reproduction animals at days 7, 14 and termination ( per tank )

b. Gender

- specific mortality ( per breeding pairs )

1 The survival rates were adjusted for the non

- treatment related deaths and animals rem oved from growth baskets for morphometric measurements.



### ( i v ) Growth (F0, F1) (8) 2

a. Length at day 0 (per mysid)

b. Length at day 7 (per mysid)

c. Length at day 14 (per mysid)

d. Length at termination. (per mysid)

e. Weight at day 0 ( per mysid )

f. Weight at day 7 ( per mysid )

g. Weight at day 14 (per mysid)

h. Weight at termination (per mysid)

2 Day 14 and terminal weights and lengths are reported by gender.

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD

Test animals and assay system

Test animals

7. The test should be started with newly released mysids (<24 hours old). T he mysid Americamysis

bahia Molenock

, 1969 (formerly Mysidopsis bahi a ) is the organism specified for these tests. Mysids should originate from laboratory cultures in order to ensure the individuals are of similar age, appearance, size

, and experimental history. All organisms used for a particular test should have originated from the same culture population. Mysids used for establishing laboratory cultures may be purchased commerciall y or collected from appropriate natural areas. Because of similarities with other mysid species, taxonomic verification should be obtained from the commercial supplier, by experienced laboratory personnel, or conducted by an outside expert. Records shoul d be kept regarding the source of the initial stock and culturing techniques.

8. Mysids should not be used for a test: (a) If more than 10 percent of the stock culture die or show signs of stress during the 14 days preceding the test; (b) If they exhi bit abnormal behavior; (c) If they or the brood stock have been used in a previous test, either in a treatment or in a control

group.

### 4 9. Care and handling. (a) Mysids should be cultured in dilution water under similar environmental conditions to those u sed

in the test. Optimal test conditions of 26 ± 1 ° C and 20 ± 2 o / oo S are recommended based on previously determined optimal salinity

- temperature conditions for survival (McKenney 1994), growth (McKenney and Celestial 1995)

, and reproduction (McKenney 1996). The brood stock must be maintained in dilution water at the test temperature for at least 14 days prior to the start of the test. (b) Organisms should be handled as little as possible. When handling is necessary it should be done as gently, carefully, and quickly as possible. When removing retention baskets containing mysids from aquaria, rotate the basket gently back and forth and then slowly remove it from the water. Immediately exa mine the mesh on the inside of the basket and gently rinse any stranded mysids off the

mesh. During culturing and acclimation, mysids should be observed carefully for signs of stress, physical damage, and mortality. Dead and abnormal individuals should b e discarded. Organisms that touch dry surfaces or are dropped or injured during handling should be discarded. (c) Fine mesh dip nets are best for removing gravid female mysids from brood stock tanks. Wide bore pipettes or smooth glass tubes equipped wi th rubber bulbs can be used for transferring <24

- h our

- old mysids. Care should be exercised to avoid bubbles in the pipette because they might allow mysids to become lodged on the side of the pipette

.

10. Feeding. During the test, the mysids should be fe d the same diet as used during culturing and

acclimation. Any food utilized should support survival, growth, and reproduction of the mysids. A

recommended food is live Artemia spp. nauplii provided ad libitum

. F ish fed nauplii obtained at 24

- h

- post hydration of cysts showed pronounced increases in growth compared to 48

- h Artemia (Ablett and Richards 1980), and accordingly, it is recommended that 24

- h our

- old nauplii be used to feed both cultured and test mysids. Vari ations in survival, growth

, and reproduction of A. bahia have been found in connection with different geographic sources and strains of Artemia (Johns et al 1981)

, and these variations in mysid performance have been correlated with differing fatty acid pro files and the availability of essential fatty acids

in the Artemia nauplii (Léger at al 1985, 1986). For these reasons, use of reference Artemia cysts for which fatty

- acid content has been determined are recommended for use in the mysid two

- generation pro tocol (Sorgeloos 1980; Léger et al 1986). The fatty

- acid profile of the b rine shrimp may be improved enhanced by exposing them to supplements that provide additional highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA), especially

docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and eicosap entaenoic acid (EpA), both of which are relatively poor in natural

strains of Artemia (Hanaee et al. 2005). Hanaee et al. (2005) found that enriching Artemia cysts increased the

HUFA content of nauplii about 1.6 times and the DHA and EpA content by 1.2 and 84 times, respectively. Culturing newly hatched Artemia with nutritional supplements suitable for aquaculture (e.g. SELCO) and to reduce pathogen transfer (e.g. SANOCARE) according to manufacturers’ recommendations is recommended

. Nauplii concentrations shown to maximize reproduction in A. bahia (McKenney 1987) should be used as a guideline , and concentrations should be adjusted so that nauplii are continually available in baskets (nauplii can be found in the basket the next day). D ensities of nauplii (per ml) from Artermia cultures (prepared daily from hydrated cysts) should be determined by replicate counts of aliquots pipetted onto filter paper. Based on these densities, various volumes of nauplii are fed twice or three times per day to m ysids in accordance with the following regime: rations for growth baskets and survival/reproduction baskets should be approximately

3600 nauplii/basket on days 1

- 3, 4500 on days 4

- 6, 5400 on days 7

- 9, 6300 on days 10

- 12

, and 7400 on days >12, while brood c ups are fed approximately 1800 nauplii/cup throughout the test. Feeding should be adjusted appropriately based on flow rates in aquaria , reproductive output, and presence of unconsumed Artemia 30 minutes after feeding . Adequate feeding can often be deter mined observationally based on the color change to mysids due to the presence of Artemia in the alimentary canal. All treatments and controls should receive, as near as reasonably possible, the same ration of food.

### 5 11. Acclimation. (a) Any change in the temperature and chemistry of the water used for holding or culturing the test organisms to those of the test water should be gradual. Within a 24

- h period, changes in water temperature should not exceed 3 o C, while salinity changes should not exceed 3 ppt. (b) During acclimation, mysids should be maintained in facilities with background colors and light intensities similar to those of the testing areas.

Water

12. Natural or artificial seawater is acceptable as dilution water if mysids will survive and successfully reproduce in it for the duration of the culturing, acclimating, and testing periods without showing signs of stress, such as reduced growth or fecundity. Mysids should be cultured and tested in dilution water of the same origin. Natural seawater should be filtered through a filter with a pore size of < 20 μ m prior to use. Artificial seawater can be prepared by adding commercially available formulations o r by adding specific amounts of

reagent

- grade chemicals to reagent water (deionized, distilled, or reverse osmosis water).

13. The temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen should be measured in the dilution water at the beginning of each test. The reafter, the temperature of the exposure water should be monitored continuously and salinity daily, while pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations are to be measured at least weekly in the exposure water within each replicate chamber. Measurement of total o rganic carbon ( TOC ) in the dilution water at the beginning of the test may also be desirable and is necessary for testing with cationic substances. The dilution water should have the following characteristics at test initiation:

(a) Dissolved oxygen sho uld be between 80 and 100 percent saturation. If necessary, the dilution

water can be aerated before the addition of the test material. (b) Salinity should be between 18 and 22 o / oo S. (c) The pH should be between 7.6 and 8.2 (d) With cationic test mat erial the TOC should be less than or equal to 5 mg/L.

Assay system

14. The design and materials used for the exposure system are optional; basically, any system that enables conformance with the performance

- based criteria described below related to che mical delivery, water quality, and animal health is acceptable. Glass, stainless steel, or other chemically inert material should be used for construction of the test system. The dimensions of the test chambers must be such that the animals can interact in a fashion conducive with successful reproduction.

15. Proportional diluters, metering pumps, or other suitable systems should be used to deliver test material to the test chambers. The choice of a specific delivery system depends on the specific properties and requirements of the test material. The system sh all be calibrated before each test. Calibration includes determining the flow rate through each chamber and the concentration of the test material in each test chamber (within 20% of nominal)

. If actual concentrations differ by greater than 20%, the caus e should be identified in order to bring the concentrations closer to nominal.

### 6 16. A closed flow

- through system may be used to test volatile compounds when more than 20 percent of the test material would be lost through volatility. A description of the d esign of this type of system should be included in the study report.

17. Mixing chambers containing test material should not be aerated.

18. Test chambers should be constructed of chemically inert material and be of suitable capacity. Mysid juveniles s hould be held in retention baskets constructed of 15

- cm glass Petri dish bottoms to which a 15 cm high cylinder of nylon mesh screen ( 250

- 350 μ m mesh) has been attached with aquarium grade (without fungicides) silicone adhesive, within test chambers to facilitate observations and eliminate loss through

outflow water. (Note: Finer mesh screen reduces the chances of mysids being lost or becoming im pinged, but can lead to greater accumulation of debris and the need for additional cleaning. ) Upon maturing, gravid females are paired with males and isolated in brood cups constructed of 10

- cm glass Petri dish bottoms to

which a 15

- cm high cyl inder of ny lon mesh screen ( 250

- 350 μ m mesh) is attached. In addition, an appropriate test material delivery system is required. The delivery system, test chambers, retention baskets

, and brood cups should be constructed so that the mysids remain submerged and are not unacceptably stressed by crowding or turbulence. The test system used should ensure a good exchange of water between the test

chambers and retention baskets . A simple overflow drain or similar system that reduces the likelihood of impingement as may occur with a self

- starting siphon is recommende d

.

19. Facilities should be well ventilated and free of fumes and disturbances that may affect test organisms. Construction materials and equipment that may contact the stock solution, test solution, or dilut ion water should not contain substances that can be leached or dissolved into aqueous solutions in quantities that can

affect the test results. Construction materials and equipment that contact stock or test solutions should be chosen to minimize sorption of test materials.

20. Test material delivery systems and test tanks should be cleaned using appropriate decontamination procedures before each test. Dead brine shrimp and other debris in the test chambers, retention baskets

, and brood cups should be removed daily. Based on daily observations of water flow through the screens of these containers, mysids should be transferred to clean retention baskets or brood cups when water flow is restricted. Practice has shown that, in g eneral, mysids require transferring to clean retention chambers and brood cups at least weekly.

Range

- finding test

21. Preliminary testing is recommended to determine the appropriate concentrations to use in the mysid

two

- generation toxicity test . The f orm of preliminary testing will depend upon existing toxicological information available on the test material. Ideally, the results of a 96

- hour toxicity test with mysids would be available. If data from an acute test are available, test concentrations a re selected where the highest concentration in the definitive test is selected to be equal to the lowest concentration that caused adverse

e ffects in the acute test or 1/5 the LC50 (EC50). The results of the acute toxicity test used to support the

selectio n of the chronic test concentrations must be reported along with the results of the definitive test. Alternatively, a pared

- down life

- cycle range

- finding test where exposure continues for a period sufficient to allow estimation of the appropriate two

- gen eration test concentrations is performed (e.g. 5 breeding pairs at 3 dose levels + controls carried through a 21 day exposure)

. The test organisms are exposed to a series of widely

- spaced concentrations of the test chemical (e.g., 1, 10, 100 mg/L). No rep licates are required and nominal concentrations of the test material are acceptable. The number of test organisms used, details of

### 7 observations, and duration of exposure do not have to be as rigorous as for definitive testing. However, the

range

- finding test will be most useful if performed in a manner similar to the intended definitive test. Results of range

- finding tests, if conducted, must be reported along with the results of the definitive test.

Definitive test

Experimental design

Test concentrations

22. Normally, five treatment concentrations are used. The highest concentration to be used should be

selected based on existing information or preliminary range

- finding test s and should not cause significant acute mortality, but should be expected to adversely affect one or more sublethal endpoint s

. Subsequent concentrations/doses used should be stepped down by at least a factor of 2. The use of five test concentrations in this fashion not only enables at least some consideration of unexp ected dose

- response relationships, but should provide for sufficient information for the determination of a No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) or an ECx.

Controls

23. Every test includes controls consisting of the same dilution water, conditions, procedures, and test population, except no test material is added. Carrier (solvent) controls are required if a solvent is used ; the

concentration should be the same in all treatments except the dilution water control.

Replicates and number of test orga nisms

24. Parental mysids (F0). A minimum of three replicate tanks per treatment are required. The test is

initiated with 20 newly

- released mysid juveniles (< 24 hours old) a ssigned to reproduction retention baskets within each replicate tank. Within t he thre e replicate tanks, one additional retention basket is initiated with 20 newly released mysid juveniles to be subsampled weekly for growth measurements. Upon reaching maturity (approximately 13

- 16 days), a pair consisting of one male and one sexuall y mature female are randomly assigned to separate brood cup s within each replicate (with a maximum of 7 m/f pairs possible per replicate).

Individua ls in the reproduction retention baskets not paired in brood cups will be maintained and observed for

survi val and sex determination within the retention baskets until they are paired or until the F 0 portion of the test is terminated ( following release of the second brood or one week after the median day of release of the

second brood of the controls ). Unused mysids from the growth retention baskets may be used to complete the male: female pairings when the sex ratio in the reproduction basket is skewed to prevent obtaining 7 pairs. In addition, remaining males from the growth retention basket may be used to r eplace male members of a reproductive pair that die prior to the end of the study. In these cases, the additional male must be accounted for in survival estimates (see Data Reporting section below).

25. F1 generation . Offspring from the second brood (F1”) or a combination of the first brood (F1’) and second (F1’’) are transferred to their respective test chambers for all treatments ( dependent on availability of 15 young from each treatment on the same day). A “brood” includes all offspring released f rom a female from the release of the first offspring for four days (though typically, all individuals are released within 24 hrs). The typical gestational interval is 5 to 9 days, so offspring released more than four days after the beginning of a

brood re lease would be considered part of a different brood. The test of the F1 generation is initiated with 15

### 8 newly

- released mysid juveniles (< 24 hours old) assigned to F1 generation reproduction retention baskets within a separate tank for each of the F0 expo sure conditions. Mixing of young released on the same day, but across replicate brood cups , is encouraged to minimize reproduction between siblings. The ages of offspring in given baskets should be tracked to know when to take growth measurements (i.e., to know when Day 7 and Day 14 are). An additional F1 generation retention basket is initiated with up to 15 newly

- released mysid juveniles if available within each replicate treatment level to be subsampled weekly for growth measurements. Priority is giv en to filling the reproduction retention baskets first, and then the growth baskets. F1 offspring should be randomly placed into chambers designated as reproduction or growth

. Subsampling for the growth measurements on days 7 and 14 should correspond to the age of the individuals placed in the growth baskets of a given replicate and not the initiation of the F1 generation. Upon reaching maturity (approximately 13

- 16 days), a pair of one male and one gravid female are randomly assigned to separate F1 gene ration brood cups within each replicate (with a maximum of 7 m/f pairs possible per replicate). Individuals in the F1 generation reprodu ction retention baskets not paired in brood cups will be maintained and observed for survival and sex

determination wit hin the F1 generation retention baskets until they are paired or until the test is terminated ( following release of the second brood or one week after the median day of release of the second brood of the

controls ). Unused mysids from the growth retention basket ma y be used to complete the male: female brood

cup pairings to obtain seven pairs if the sex ratio in the reproduction basket is skew ed

. In addition, remaining

males from the growth retention basket may be used to replace male members of a reproductive pair that die prior to the end of the study. In these cases, the additional male must be accounted for in survival estimates (see Data Reporting section below ).

Administration of test substance and analytical determination

Exposure via water

26. From a practical perspective, only variations on the aqueous route are appropriate for exposing mysids to a test substance. The biggest challenge with water exposure is preparing aqueous solutions of high

concentration relative to solubility limitations of the test substances in the water (OECD 2000 ) . Organic solvents are often used as carriers to assist in delivering a test substance in water. While it is preferred not to use a solvent carrier, w ater exposures can be conducted e ither with or without a solvent carrier for the test chemical of concern. When a chemical is relatively soluble in water (ionic compounds)

, a solvent is not required to enhance water solubility for preparation of stock solutions; however, much of the toxi city testing historically conducted with aquatic animals and sparingly soluble nonionic chemicals has utilized carrier

solvents.

27

. The use of liquid

- liquid and solid

- liquid saturators to generate solvent

- free stock solutions for aqueous testing has bee n reported in recent years, and methods have been described using these approaches to test chemicals with widely varying physicochemical properties, including some considered to be very insoluble in water ( Kahl et al., 1999; Makynen et al, 2000).

28

. When the characteristics of the test substance make use of saturators impractical (when the chemical is very insoluble, unstable in a saturator system, or expensive/limited in availability) and it is necessary to utilize solvents to generate stock solution s for aqueous testing, the recommended solvent carrier is triethylene glycol

at a concentration ≤ 50 μ l/ L . Exposure of Americamysis bahia through an entire life cycle to triethylene glycol concentrations as high as 1000 mg/l (20,000 times higher than triethylene glycol concentrations recommended

### 9 in this guideline) had no effect on the survival or reproduction of exposed organisms (Montgomer y et al 1985). In general, the toxicity of other solvents has not been fully evaluated in chronic tests. Hence, it is essential that any test utilizing a carrier solvent

, other than triethylene glycol at low μ l/ L concentrations, include both

solvent

- expo sed and non

- exposed controls.

Analytical determination

29

. Regardless of the exposure technique utilized for this assay, supporting analytical chemistry is critical to (i) ensure chemical purity, (ii) document that the test chemical is reaching the mysi ds, and (iii) confirm system performance. In water exposures, concentrations of the (parent) chemical should be measured in the stock solution(s) and in each of the test treatments prior to the introduction of test organisms at the start of the assay. Af ter test organisms are introduced into the exposure system on Day 0 of the test

, and throughout the remainder of the exposure period for the F0 mysids, concentrations of the (parent) chemical should be measured at least weekly in each of the test treatment s. Should this test also expose the F1 generation, analytical determination for this generation will follow the procedures described above for the F0 generation. Adequate detection and half

- life of the parent compound in aquatic media must to be determin ed before initiation of the study to accurately measure exposure concentrations of test chemical.

PERFORMANCE OF THE TEST

Test initiation and conduct

Chemical exposure

30

. The exposure portion of the test should not be initiated until all aspects of t he delivery system are confirmed to have been functioning properly for 48 hours. This includes verification of stable test material concentrations and environmental conditions such as temperature, salinity

, and dissolved oxygen concentrations. The exposu re duration for the parental cohort (F0) is approximately a month, with sufficient time for healthy females to produce a minimum of two broods. Exposure for the F0 mysids begins when < 24

- hour

- old individuals are randomly transferred into the test aquaria from the stock cultures.

31

. At initiation, 20 < 24

- hour

- old individuals are randomly transferred into nylon screen baskets in each replicate chamber , such that each treatment group receives a minimum of 60 mysids for use in the reprod uction portion of the test. An additional 20 mysids are randomly assigned to similar baskets within each replicate chamber for use in obtaining growth measurements

. Each replicate will contain a total of 40 mysids split into two baskets of 20 mysids, one for use in repro duction pairing and one for growth measurements , and there will be a minimum of three replicates per treatment

.

32. Fifteen Day 0 mysids are collected from the stock culture and their length determined. These mysids are separated into nine groups of fi ve mysids

, and then each group is placed on a screen, rinsed in deionized

water, placed in a pre

- weighed aluminum tin

, and dried in an oven at 60 ° C for 48 h. Dried mysid samples are kept in a desiccator for at least an additional 48 hours (to allow for co oling of the sample) prior to weighing to

the nearest 1.0 μ g on a microbalance.

### 10 33

. The mysids held in both the reproduction and growth baskets are fed newly hatched (< 24

- h our

- old) brine shrimp ( Artemia sp.) nauplii ad libitum daily ( e.g. , at the recommended densities described in S ection

10 )

.

34

. At two time intervals (Day 7 and Day 14), mysids are sampled from the growth baskets. On Day 7, six mysids are removed from each replicate growth basket and their length determined. These six my sids are separated into three groups of two mysids and then each group, placed on a screen, rinsed with deionized

water, placed in three pre

- weighed aluminum tins

, and dried in an oven at 60 ° C for 48 h. On Day 14, the remaining mysids (at least three)

-- those not sampled at Day 7, those not used to complete reproduction pairings

, and those not reserved for optional biochemical analyses

-- are remove d from the growth basket in each of the three replicate tanks for all treatment levels and their length dete rmined. Each mysid is then individually placed on a screen, rinsed with deionized water, placed in a pre

- weighed aluminum tin, and dried

in an oven at 60 ° C for 48 h. Dried mysid samples are kept in a desic c ator for at least an additional 48 hours (to allow for cooling of the sample) prio r to weighing to the nearest 1.0 μ g on a microbalance. The weight observations should be recorded separately for males, females, and immature individuals. Data analyses

should a lso be conducted relative to each sex.

35

. When developing embryos can be discerned within an individual female, this ovigerous female is paired with one male and the pair is isolated in a separate brood cup within the same replicate chamber.

Selection of the largest males for placement in the brood cups will reduce the possibility of mistakenly pairing the female with an immature female, which would result in a delay of second brood release until after the

mistake was realized and corrected. Mysids th at are not paired should remain in the survival/reproduction baskets until only 3 or fewer remain at which time the y are transferred to a separate brood cup.

36

. Offspring of the F0 mysids are collected and transferred to aquaria with clean dilution water (for tests exposing only the F0 generation) or the same toxicant treatments to which they were exposed during the F0 generation (for tests exposing mysids through both generations) . Care should be taken when transferring animals from treatment group s with test chemical to minimize any transfer of test material.

37

. Groups of 15 < 24

- hour

- old offspring (F1) from either the first (F1’) or second brood (F1”) of the F0 mysids are isolated in reproduction baskets (as described in Section 34 ), which are pl aced within the F1 tanks for the respective exposure conditions of the F0 generation. Mixing of young released on the same day, but across replicate chambers, is encouraged to minimize rep roduction between siblings. Additional groups of 15 Day

- 0 F1 mysids

, if available

, are randomly assigned to growth baskets within F1 tanks of the same exposure treatment of their parents. Leftover Day 0 mysids from each parental exposure condition are collected in groups of 5, their length measured, placed on a screen, rinsed with deionized water, placed in pre

- weighed

aluminum tins

, and dried in an oven at 60 ° C for 48 h. Dried mysid samples are kept in a desiccator at least 48 hours prior to weighing to the nearest 1.0 μg on a microbalance.

38

. The mysids are fed ne wly hatched (< 24

- h our

- old) brine shrimp ( Artemia sp.) nauplii ad libitum ( e.g. , at the recommended densities described in section 10 )

.

39

. At two ti me intervals for the F1 mysids (Day 7 and Day 14), mysids are sampled from the growth baskets. On Day 7, optimally six mysids are removed from each replicate growth basket and their length determined. These six mysids are separated into three groups of two mysids and then each group is placed on a screen, rinsed with deionized water, placed in three pre

- weig hed aluminum tins, and dried in an oven at 60 ° C for 48 h. On Day 14, the remaining mysids (at least three)

-- those not sampled at Day 7, those not used to

### 11 complete reproduction pairings

, and those not reserved for optional biochemical analyses

-- are rem oved and their length determined. Each mysid is then placed individually on a screen, rinsed with deionized water, placed in a pre

- weighed aluminum tin, and dried in an oven at 60 ° C for 48 h. Dried mysid samples are kept in a desiccator prio r to weighing to the nearest 1.0 μg on a microbalance. The weight observations should be recorded separately for males, females, and immature individuals. Data analyses should also be conducted

relative to each sex.

40

. When developing embryos can be discerned wit hin an individual F1 female, this ovigerous female is paired with one male and the pair are isolated in a separate brood cup within the same F1 tank. Selection of the largest males for placement in the brood cups will reduce the possibility of mistakenly pairing the female with an immature female, which would result in a delay of second brood release until after the mistake was

realized and corrected. Mysids that are not paire d should remain in the reproduction baskets until only 3 or

fewer remain at whic h time the are transferred to a separate brood cup identified by replicate within the F1 tank (receiving clean seawater) for that specific exposure condition.

41

. Offspring of the F1 mysids are enumerated daily until 7 days after the median day of releas e of the second brood (F1”) at which time the test is terminated.

Observations

4 2

. Daily assessment of survival in both the growth and reproductive chambers, and reproductive output of the reproductive pairs will be made throughout the test

. Mortali ties will be recorder each day, and when possible (i.e. after maturity), the sex of the dead animal will be recorded. If a male member of a reproductive pair dies before the second brood is released, he can be replaced by a male from the growth chamber. Survival data must be adjusted accordingly (see explanation in data reporting section below). If a female member of a reproductive pair dies during the study, she will not be replaced. Mortalities that are clearly non

- treatment related (e.g. handling acc idents) will be distinguished from possible treatment

- related mortality (see data reporting section and example spreadsheet). The default assumption will be that mortality is due to treatment

related effects. Daily reproductive output will be recorded to calculate number of offspring/female/d. Unless unacceptable water quality excursions and/or disease occur, observed mortality in untreated control animals during the chemical exposure phase of the test is generally <25%. In animals exposed to the test ch emical, overt lethality may occur, particularly in later portions of the assay not reflective of the initial (shorter) range

finding test.

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

43

. The following criteria are for judging test data acceptability:

• Water quality characteri stics should remain within the tolerance limits depicted in Tables 1 and 2;

• There should be documentation (via appropriate analytical chemistry) of purity of the test material, as well as delivery of chemical to the test mysids (e.g., concentrations of the chemical in test water);

• There should be at least 7 0 % survival of control animals in all test phases over the duration of the chemical

exposure.

• At least 75% of the females in the F0 and F1 controls must produce young.

• The average total number of young produced per control female in the first two broods is at least eight.

### 12 DATA REPORTING

Treatment and interpretation of results

4 5

. Normality can be formally assessed using the Shapiro

- Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk ( 1965). It was assessed from residuals (r esults of subtracting treatment group means from individual values). Screened potential outliers were included in the tests. Outliers can be tested in one generation analyses using Tukey’s

outlier rule on the untransformed data. Outliers were assessed fr om residuals (results of subtracting treatment group means from individual values) to avoid confounding outliers and treatment effects. Any response more than 1.5 times the interquartile range above the third quartile (75 th percentile) or below the first quartile (25 th
percentile) is considered an outlier by Tukey’s rule. All statistical outliers should be screened to determine if

there is a non

- biological explanation for the outlier response. Unless there is a valid reason for exclusion,

outliers should be included in data analyses. If data deviate substantially from the assumption of normality, data may be transformed (e.g. log transformation, square root transformation, arc sin transformation) an d

retested. If the normality assumption is accepted for either the untransformed or the transformed data heterogeneity of variances among the concentration groups was assessed with Levene’s test with absolute residuals (Box, 1953). Unless there is a basis for exclusion, screened outlier test should be included in the Levene’s tests. If the normality assumption was invalid for both the untransformed and the transformed data heterogeneity of variances among the concentration groups was not assessed as the nonparametric procedures are appropriate for data analyses

. If assumptions of normality and homoscedascity are upheld, data from each generation should be analyzed using and analysis of variance (ANOVA) may be used to determine differences among treatment and control groups. If one or both tests fail, a nonparametric statistic such as a Kruskal

Wallis test should be used to compare treatment groups. The appropriate multiple comparisons procedure should be selected to compare each treatment level to the control (e.g., Dunnett’s procedure for parametric

da ta, Dunn’s test for nonparametric data). Mysid generational data should be analyzed according procedures followed for each generation and described above to compare the effects in the F0 and F1 generations. Comparisons of the F0 and F1 generations can be performed with a two way mixed effects ANOVA model, including generation, concentration group, and the interaction of generation and concentration as fixed effects and replicate (concentration, generation) as a random effect, allowing unequal variances bet ween the two generations.

4 6

. It is strongly recommended that a statistician be involved in both the design and analysis of the test results since the test guideline allows for some variation in experimental design.

4 7

. Any endpoints that are signific antly affected by the test chemical should be reported as such.

48. Mortality among mating pairs must be distinguished from mating pairs that produced no offspring. If a male member of the reproductive pair dies before production of the second brood, h e is replaced by a male from the growth retention basket if there are sufficient animals. If the female member of the pair dies before release of the second brood, she is not replaced and the number of offspring produced for any brood after her

death shou ld be identified in the data record as “NA” (not applicable) and not included in calculations of number of offspring/female. If neither the male or female member of the breeding pair dies, but produce no offspring, the number of offspring in the data reco rd should be recorded as 0 (zero).

49. If males from the growth retention basket were used to replace dead males in the reproduction chambers, the mortality must be included in the survival calculations (see Annex 4 for more detail).

### 13 50. Median day of b rood release should be based on values from reproductive pairs that survived to produce a brood and produced some offspring.

Test report

51. The test report must include the following:

Name of investigator, laboratory

, and dates of test.

Test substance:

- The report must include a detailed description of the test substance, including information on its CAS number, source, lot number and purity.

- Additional information should be provided, when available, such as its solubility in water,

oct anol

- water partition coefficient, vapor pressure, toxicity to other aquatic organisms (both targeted pests and non

- target species), etc.

Test species:

- Information must be provided on the mysids used in the test. If the mysids were field

- collected, this information must include the location and dates of collection; the salinity and temperature

conditions at the time of collection

, and the acclimation history of the animals when returned to the laboratory. If the mysids were purchased, this informati on must include the dates of shipment and receipt, and the supplier’s name and address. If the test mysids were cultured in the laboratory, the information must include the original collection location and date

, and pertinent history of the cultured mysid s. Age range of juvenile mysids used to begin the test (within how many hours of release by parental female) must be reported.

- Any observed abnormalities in reproductive behavior or performance of control mysids must also be reported.

Test conditions:

- The report must specify the conditions under which the test was performed

. T hese include:

• information on the source, treatment of, and basic chemical characteristics of the dilution

water;

• means and ranges for water temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen concentrations

, and pH;

• the photoperiod and light quality used during the exposure;

• the number of replicates and the replicate chamber size ; number of females and males per replicate;

• information on Artemia used to feed the mysids during the exposure, including supplier and lot number, analyses for relevant contaminants (e

. g
., PCBs, PAHs

, and organochlorine pesticides) and fatty acids, hydration protocol

, and daily feeding regime;

• the basic nature of exposure (i.e.

, flow

- through) in additi on to specific information related to the exposure type (e.g.

, whether continuous or intermittent flow

- through water delivery type,

### 14 flow rate, daily number of volume exchanges of dilution water or water displacement percentages over time);

• use of solvent o r dispersant if any, the specific solvent or dispersant and the concentrations to which the mysids were exposed; the type, manufacturer

, and purity of solvent or dispersant; if the exposure route was by injection, the carrier and stock infusion rate ( μ l/ho ur) and water delivery rate ( L /hr); and

• the type of controls and the nominal toxicant concentrations; mean and range of toxicant
concentrations ( μ l /L or n l /L ) for each test treatment and control measured; copies of chemical analysis reports.



### Results:

- The results must include data for the control

, solvent control when used

, and treatment

- exposed mysids. Include the nominal test concentrations, the results of all analyses to determine the concentration of the test substance in the test chambers, the rec overy efficiency of the method

, and the limit of detection.

- The table of results must include the mean, standard deviation

, and range for each test endpoint
from the replicates employed in the test. Results from appropriate statistical analyses such as a n

ANOVA (parametric) or a Kruskal

- Wallis (nonparametric) test of each of the various test
endpoints across the various treatments and a multiple means comparison test (e.g.

, Dunnett’s or
William’s procedure) (Dunnett 1955, 1964; Williams 1971, 1972) that all ows statistical
significance of means should be included. If an ECx is used, a rationale for the “x” value
chosen, the regression model used, and confidence bounds around the estimate should be
presented.

### 15 LITERATURE

(1) Ablett RF and Richards RH. (198 0) Suitability of twenty

- four

- hour and forty

- eight

- hour unfed

Artemia as an early foodstuff for ‘0’ group Dover sole ( Solea solea L.) production. Aquaculture

19:371

- 377.

(2) ASTM ( 2005 ) Standard guide for conducting life

- cycle toxicity tests with saltwa ter mysids. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 11.05. American Society for Testing of Materials. E1191

- 03a

. Philadelphia, PA.

(3) Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparisons procedure for comparing several treatments with a

control. J Amer Statist As soc 50:1096

- 1121.

(4) Dunnett CW (1964) New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20: 482

- 491.

(5) Hanaee, J., N. Agh, M. Hanaee, A. Delazar, and S.D. Sarker. 2005. Studies on the Enrichment of

Artemia urmiana Cysts for Improving Fish Food Value. Animal Feed Science and Technology

120:107

- 112.

(6 ) Johns DM, Berry WJ, and Walton W. (1981) International study on Artemia. XVI. Survival, growth and reproduction potential of the mysid, Mysidopsis bahia Molenock fed various geographic strains of the brine shrimp, Artemia

. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 53:209

- 219.

(7 ) Kahl MD, Russom CL, DeFoe DL, Hammermeister DE. (1999) Saturation units for use in aquatic bioassays. Chemosphere 39:539

- 551.

L é ger P, Sorgeloos P, Millamena OM, and Simpson KL. (1985) International study on Artemia. XXV. Factors determining the nutritional effectiveness of Artemia: The relative impact of chlorinated hydrocarbons and essential fatty acids in San Francisco Bay and San Pablo Bay Artemia

. J Exp Mar

Biol Ecol 93:7 1

- 82.

(8 ) L é ger P, Bengtson DA, Simpson KL, and Sorgeloos, P. (1986) The use and nutritional value of

Artemia as a food source. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 24:521

- 623.

(9 ) Makynen EA, Kahl MD, Jensen KM, Tietge JE, Wells KL, Van Der Kraak G, and Ankley GT. (2000) Effects of the mammalian antiandrogen vinclozolin on development and reproduction of the fathead minnow ( Pimephales promelas ). Aquat Toxicol 48:461

- 475.

(10 ) Mc Kenney CL, Jr. (1982) Interrelationships between energy metabolism, growth dynamics, and reproduction during the life cycle of Mysidopsis bahia as influenced by sublethal endrin exposure. In: Physiological Mechanisms of Marine Pollutant Toxicity , WB Ve rnberg, A. Calabrese, FP Thurberg and FJ Vernberg, Eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 447

- 476.

(11 ) McKenney CL, Jr. (1986) Influence of the organophosphate insecticide fenthion on Mysidopsis bahia exposed during a complete life cy c le. I. Survival, r eproduction, and age

- specific growth. Dis quat Org 1:131

- 139.

### 16 (12 ) McKenney CL, Jr. (1987) Optimization of Environmental Factors during the Life Cycle of Mysidopsis bahia

. Environ Res Brief , EPA/600/M

- 87/004, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH, 6 p.

(13 ) McKen ney CL, Jr. (1994) Resistance patterns to salinity and temperature in an estuarine mysid ( Mysidopsis bahia ) in relation to its life cycle. Comp Biochem Physiol 109A:199

- 208.

(14 ) McKenney CL, Jr. (1996) The combined effects of salinity and temperature on various aspects of the reproductive biology of the estuarine mysid, Mysidopsis bahia

. Invertebr Reprod Dev 29(1): 9

- 18.

(15 ) McKenney CL, Jr. and Celestial DM. (1995) Interact ions among salinity, temperature, and age on growth of the estuarine mysid Mysidopsis bahia reared in the laboratory through a complete life cycle. I. Body mass and age

- specific growth rate. J Crust Biol 15:169

- 178.

(16 ) McKenney CL, Jr. and Celestial DM. (1996) Modified survival, growth and reproduction in an estuarine mysid ( Mysidopsis bahia ) exposed to a juvenile hormone analogue through a complete life cycle. Aquat Toxicol 35(1):11

- 20.

(17 ) McKenney CL, Jr. (1998) Physiological dysfunction in e stuarine mysids and larval decapods with chronic pesticide exposure. In: Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology: Advances, Techniques, and

Practice , PG Wells, K Lee, and C Blaise, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Chapter 32, pp. 465

- 476.

(18 ) Montgomer y RM, Forester J and D’Asaro CN. (1985) Effects of triethylene glycol on Mysidopsis

bahia (Crustacea: Mysidacea) and Menidia peninsulae (Pisces: Atherinidae). In: Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Eighth Symposium, ASTM STP 891 , RC Bahner and DJ Hansen, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 270

- 276.

(19 ) Nimmo DR, Bahner LH, Rigby RA, Sheppard JM and Wilson AJ, Jr. (1977) Mysidopsis bahia : an estuarine species suitable for life

- cycle toxicity tests to determin e the effects of a pollutant. In: Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Evaluation, ASTM STP 634 . FL Mayer and JL Hamelink, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 109

- 116.

(20 ) Nimmo DR, Hamaker TL and Sommers CA. (1978) Entire life cycle toxicity test using mysids ( Mysidopsis bahia ) in flowing water. In: Bioassay Procedures for the Ocean Disposal Permit Program , EPA

- 600/9

- 78

- 010, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, FL, pp. 64

- 68

.

(21 ) OECD. (2000) Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and

Mixtures

. OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications , Series on Testing and Assessment

No.23. ENV/JM/MONO(2000)6

.

( 22 ) OECD. (2004) Current Approaches in the Statistical Analysis of Ecotoxicity Data : A Guidance to Application

. Environmental Health and Safety Publications. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 54

. ENV/JM/MONO(2006)18/ANN. 140pp.

( 23 ) Raimondo S and McKenney CL, Jr. (200 5 a) P rojecting population

- level response s of mysids exposed

to an endocrine disrupting chemical. Integr Comp Biol

. 45(1):151

- 157.

### 17 ( 24 ) Raimondo S and McKenney CL, Jr. (200 5 b) Projected population

- level effects of thiobencarb exposure on the mysid, Americamysi s bahia , and extinction probability in a concentration

- decay

exposure system. Environ Tox Chem

. 24(3):564

- 572.

( 25 ) Sprague JB. (1969) Review paper: Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish I. Bioassay methods for acute toxicity. Water Res 3:793

- 821.

( 26 ) Sorgeloos P. (1980) Availability of reference Artemia cysts. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 3:363

- 364.

( 27 ) Verslycke TA, Fockedey N, McKenney CL, Jr., Roast, SD, Jones, MB, Mees, J and Janssen, CR. (2004) Mysid crustaceans as potential test or ganisms for the evaluation of environmental endocrine disruption: a review. Environ Tox Chem 23 (5): IN PRESS.

( 28 ) Williams DA (1971) A test for the differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics 27: 103

- 117.

( 29 ) Williams DA (1972) The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics 28:

510

- 531.

### 18 ANNEX 1

Table 1. Test Conditions For The Mysid Two

- Generation Test Guideline

1. Recommended species Mysid ( Americamysis bahia )

2. Test type Continuous or intermittent flow

- through

3. Water temperature 2 6 ± 1 o C

4. Illumination quality Fluorescent bulbs (wide spectrum)

5. Salinity 20 ± 2 o /

oo 6. Photoperiod 14 h light, 10 h dark, with 15

- 30 minute transition period

7. Loading rate Minimum of 30 animals per replicate tank (two baskets with 15 a nimals/basket)

8. Test replicate chamber size Minimum of 98x15x18 cm

9. Test replicate solution volume ≈ 21 liters ( when water depth is at its greatest )

10. Volume exchanges of test

s olutions Provide no less than 90 % water replacement in 8

- 12 hours (Sprague 1969) for

continuous

- flow systems or a minimum of 70% water displacement every 5 hours using

an intermittent

- flow system with self

- starting excurrent siphons (McKenney 1986)

11. Age of test organisms at initiation < 24 hours

1 2 . No. of mysids per test vessel F0: Minimum of 4 0 /replicate; 20 /retention basket; 2 ( 1 m ale & 1 f emale )/ brood cup

F1: Minimum of 30/replicate; 15/retention basket; 2 (1 male & 1 female)/ brood cup

1 3

. No. of treatments ≥ 5 (plus appropriate controls)

14. No. replicates per treatment ≥ 3

15. No. of mysids per test

concentration (start) Minimum of 40 /repli cate; 3 replicates/treatment; 120 mysids per test concentration

16. Feeding regime 24

- hour old brine shrimp nauplii at recommended densities (refer to section 10)

17. Aeration None unless DO reaches <60% saturation

18. Dilution water Natural or artificial seawater acceptable to saltwater mysids; uniform quality during test; should not affect test outcome; same source as culture water.

If natural, must use 0.25 micron

- filtered

Must allow satisfactory survival, growth, and reproduction in controls

If solvent used, < 0.05 ml/L conce ntration; use solvent controls

19. Exposure period Trans

- generational test: 7 days after median day of release of second brood in controls (F0 only)

Two

- generation test: 7 days after median day of release of second brood in F1 controls

20. Primary endp oints Survival

, (F0, F1);

Growth

- length & dry weight , (Days 0, 7 and 14 for F0 and F1);

Time to maturation , (F0, F1) Time to first brood release

, (F0, F1)

Time to second brood release , (F0, F1)

Interbrood duration , (F0, F1) Number of young per female in each of the first two broods (F0, F1) Number of total young in the first two broods in each replicate population (F0, F1)

Sex ratio (F0, F1) Percentage of females that are reproductively active (F0, F1)

21. Optional endpoints Optional biochemical measure ments
22. Test acceptability Dissolved oxygen > 60% of saturation; mean temperature of 26 ± 1 o C; mean salinity of

20 o /

oo S ± 2 o /

oo S; ≥ 70% survival of each generation of mysids in control treatments; successful reproduction in at least 75% of control females with an average total of at least 8 young in the first two broods

### 19 ANNEX 2

Table 2. Recommended ranges of water quality characteristics for culturing and testing

Water characteristic Preferred range Method of measurement

Temperature ( o C) 24.0

- 26.0 Alcohol or electronic thermometer

Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) > 4.9 mg/L ( > 60% saturation) Iodometric or membrane electrode

pH 7.6

- 8.2 Electronic meter

Salinity 18

- 22 o /

oo S Optical or digital salinometer

If test material is cationic: Total organic carbon (mg/L) < 5 TOC analyzer

### 20 ANNEX 3



### Mysid Two

- generation Test Method Schematic

### 21 Annex 4: Table of endpoints
Endpoint Comments

Nominal concentration

Measured concentration per tank
Survival (day 0

- 7) %
per tank surviving mysids in growt h + reproductionc h ambers

total mysids in growt h + reproduction c h ambers Survival (day 0

- 14) %

Per tank surviving mysids in growt h + reproductionc h ambers
( total in growt h

− mysids removed for growt h measures at day 7 ) + total reproduction c h ambers

Survival (0

- termination)%

Per tank surviving mysids in growt h + reproductionc h ambers
( total in growt h

− mysids removed for growt h measures at day 7 and 14 ) + total reproduction c h ambers
Female mortality %

Per tank Number of breeding pair females t h at died

total number of females in all breeding pairs

Male mortalit y %

Per tank Number of males t h at died

total number of males in all breeding pairs Dry Weight (day 0) μg

per 5 mysid s Dry Weight (day 7) μg

P er 2 mysid s Dry Weight M (day 14) μg per mysid

Dry Wei ght F (day 14)μg
per mysid
Dry Weight M (termination)

μg per mysid
Dry Weight F (termination)

μg per mysid
Length (day 0) mm per mysid
Length (day 7 ) mm per mysid

### 22 Length Male (day 14 ) mm per mysid
Length Female (day 14 ) mm per mysid
Length M (termination ) mm per mysid
Length F (termination ) mm per mysid
Day of termination
per tank

Median t ime to maturation

per tank Day when brood pouch is first observed ; observation based on reproductive basket only

Median day of 1 st brood

release

per tank Days after study initiation ; observation based on reproductive basket only

Median day of 2 nd brood

release

per tank Days after study initiation ; observation based on reproductive basket only

Interbrood duration per breeding pair #offspring/F 1 st brood a

per breeding pair Number of surviving offspring in 1 st brood
females in breeding pairs #offspring/F 2 nd brood a

per breeding pair Number of surviving offspring in 2 nd brood
females in breeding pairs Total # offspring in first 2

broods

per breeding pair Number of surviving offspring in 1 st + 2 nd b roods
females in breeding pairs t h at survived and produced 2 broods

Total # offspring / F

Per tank Total number of surviving offspring in any brood

all bre eding pair females
Percentage of
reproductively active F

Per tank number of pairs producing offspring

total females in all breeding pairs

Study day per tank (or treatment) Study day = 0 on the day the treatment cohort is established (and mysids are < 24 hr old)

Pairing day
per tank Number of days after initiation of study when reproductive pairs are established

### 23 Exposure duration (day)

Per tank Until release of 2 nd brood for all treatment groups or 7 days after the release of the 2 nd brood of the control

group Reproductive days

Per b reeding pair 

### Day of termination

– day of first brood release

# young/F/reproductive day
Per breeding pair

Female sex ratio % a

Per tank number of F in growt h basket + number of F in reproduction basket

Total number of individuals in growt h basket + total number of individuals i n reproduction basket

a 

### Sex ratio is calculated after sex can be determined for individuals in a treatment growth (i.e. after females have developed a marsupial pouch) If there are no offspring for a brood, brood size is recorded as zero if female is still living, and “NA” (recorded as missing) for if female died without releasing the brood. Percentage of female s reproductively active and sex ratio are reported per tank. The other reproductive endpoints are reported per mating pair.