alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT  ON FORM  10-Q SB FOR THE  FISCAL  QUARTER  ENDED  JUNE  30,  1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,273
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      6,031
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          32,547
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            32,435
<LOANS>                                        124,886
<ALLOWANCE>                                        718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,849
<DEPOSITS>                                     148,001
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,294
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 172,849
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,695
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,208
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   144
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,047
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,188
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,859
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    817
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         817
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.52
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,004
<LOANS-PAST>                                        83
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   642
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  718
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               412
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            306
        

</TABLE>
#### MARTINEZ v. STATE.

No. 20163.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 21, 1940.

Order Set Aside Oct. 23, 1940.

Ramon L. Longoria, of McAllen, and W. Kennedy Smith, of Raymondville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Rogers Kelley, Criminal Dist. Atty., and Tom L. Hartley, Asst. Co. and Dist. Atty., both of Edinburg, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas will stay the issuance of mandate in the above entitled and numbered cause until the appellant has opportunity to ' present an application for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, and in the event such writ should be granted, to further stay the issuance of mandate until the Supreme Court of the United States shall have determined the case.

Order.

The judgment of conviction in this cause became final on the 22d day of May, 1940 when appellant’s motion for rehearing was overruled. . Thereafter on the 21st day of June, 1940 upon application of appellant’s attorneys the clerk was directed to stay the issuance of the mandate to give appellant opportunity to take such steps as he deemed necessary to have the case reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States.

It is now made known to the court upon motion of the State that since such stay order no effective effort has been made to seek such a review and that no request therefor is pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. By reason of these facts the order of the court staying the issuance of the mandate should be set aside and the mandate of this court should at once issue.

In reply to the State’s motion attorney for appellant suggests that the reason efforts were suspended to have the judgment of this court reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States was because of the refusal of appellant to sign the necessary papers. Counsel suggests that in his opinion the reason appellant so refused was because he had become insane since the trial. If the issue of present insanity should be raised this court has no jurisdiction to determine the question, but it must be determined by the trial court after its jurisdiction has been restored, which will occur upon receipt of the mandate of this court. Therefore, a further suspension of the issuance of the mandate is not deemed proper.

The court now directs that the order heretofore made on the 21st day of June, 1940 staying issuance of the mandate be set aside, and the Clerk of this court is ordered to issue mandate instanter.
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

            I, Andy Teng, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of Northgate Innovations, Inc., certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Northgate
Innovations, Inc.;

            2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

            4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and

                  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

            5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

                  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



<PAGE>

                  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: October 1, 2003

/s/ Andy Teng
-------------------------------------
Andy Teng
Chief Executive Officer and Acting CFO
. .... ... ,

' .. . . . . . . . . - ~; ., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 , '. '. 'i .~. :// ': • I /\ 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS , ____ _ ··· .. .... . ,, 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 202;-OCT -5 AM 11: 25 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

·,;· . .......... n/tl ,.I \, • • - · · -"• • --=-~-

v. CASE NO. 5 :22-CR-079-H-BQ-2 

ARELYJANETMENDOZA 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Information, charging defendant with a violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 371, that is, Conspiracy to Commit Theft, Embezzlement, or Misapplication by 

Bank Officer or Employee. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned 

magistrate judge finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00079-H-BQ Document 24 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 59
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed October 5, 2022. 

. 

TE JUDGE 

Case 5:22-cr-00079-H-BQ Document 24 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 60
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 281 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 281

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 20, 1993

              Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

                            October 21, 1993

                   Discharged; considered and passed

                                     

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 281

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1993

   Mr. Natcher introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

                            October 21, 1993

     Committee on Appropriations discharged; considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That section 106(c) of Public 
Law 103-88 is amended by striking out ``October 21, 1993'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``October 28, 1993''.
```
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 27 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

      H.Con.Res.27
                                        Agreed to January 27, 1993      
                       One Hundred Third Congress
                                 of the
                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Wednesday, January 27, 1993, it stand 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, February 2, 1993.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 18, 2016

CONTACT: Rob Friedlander, Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING JULY 18

WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. Lew today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in an executive session at the Treasury 

Department. 

During the meeting, the Council received an update on recent market developments, including 

developments related to the United Kingdom referendum on membership in the European Union. 

The Council also discussed its ongoing assessment of potential risks to U.S. financial stability 

from asset management products and activities, following the Council’s public update on this 

topic in April. Staff provided an update regarding the ongoing work of the Council’s hedge fund 

working group.

The Council also received an update on the results of the stress tests recently conducted by the 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve), which indicated that the 

country’s largest bank holding companies continue to increase capital levels.

In addition, the Office of Financial Research and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York 

presented to the Council on efforts to collect and analyze data regarding bilateral repurchase 

agreements and securities lending transactions. Staff provided an update on the joint pilot 

project launched by the Office of Financial Research, Federal Reserve, and Securities and 

Exchange Commission to facilitate improved data collection and analysis.

Finally, the Council voted to approve the minutes of its previous meetings on June 21 and June 

24. 

 

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved meeting 

minutes are available at http://www.fsoc.gov. 
###
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 128 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 128

 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                     respect to the right to life.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1993

   Mr. Oberstar (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Collins of 
 Georgia, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. 
   Mazzoli, Mr. Packard, Mr. Poshard, and Mr. Walsh) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
                     respect to the right to life.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be valid only if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of final passage of this joint 
resolution:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. With respect to the right to life, the word `person' 
as used in this article and in the fifth and fourteenth Articles of 
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States applies to all human 
beings irrespective of age, health, function, or condition of 
dependency, including their unborn offspring at every stage of their 
biological development.
    ``Section 2. No unborn person shall be deprived of life by any 
person: Provided, however, That nothing in this article shall prohibit 
a law permitting only those medical procedures required to prevent the 
death of the mother.
    ``Section 3. The Congress and the several States shall have power 
to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3323]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Unblockable Drains/Public Accommodations--Virginia Graeme Baker 
Pool and Spa Safety Act/Minimum State Requirements for Grants.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast/index.html.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3323 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
```
EXHIBIT A 

Case 3:22-cv-01769-E Document 1-1 Filed 08/26/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID 15
Case 3:22-cv-01769-E Document 1-1 Filed 08/26/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID 16
Case 3:22-cv-01769-E Document 1-1 Filed 08/26/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID 17
#### PARVIN v. STATE.

No. 26172.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appear regular; and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
Janice B. Trouba, Chief Financial Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)       
          The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2007, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
          The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp,
          Inc.

|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By: /s/ Janice B. Trouba      
      Janice B. TroubaIts:   Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.