alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 375 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 375

     Designating September 21, 1994, as ``National Wartime Nurses 
                           Recognition Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1994

Mr. Montgomery (by request) introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     Designating September 21, 1994, as ``National Wartime Nurses 
                           Recognition Day''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That September 21, 1994, is 
hereby designated as ``National Wartime Nurses Recognition Day''. The 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon agencies and organizations and the people of the United States to 
observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2015-B |
E Pluribus Unum

Out of Many, One

Strategic Plan

Fiscal Years 2007-2012 

Vision

Set the global standard for financial and economic leadership

Mission

Serve the American people and strengthen national security by managing the U.S. 

Government’s finances effectively, promoting economic growth and stability, and 

ensuring the safety, soundness, and security of U.S. and international financial systems

Values

Accountability

Integrity

Community

Excellence

Objectivity

Service

Priorities

• Reform entitlement programs to reduce fiscal burden

• Promote open markets

• Enable competitiveness of U.S. capital markets

• Maximize voluntary compliance

• Improve financial management processes

• Enable the government to be financed at the lowest cost over time

• Apply Treasury authorities effectively in support of national security priorities

• Invest in the IT infrastructure required to support the national security strategy

• Drive improved results through leveraging of all resources, decision-making based on 

cost and performance, developing leadership depth, and closing skill gaps.
Strategic 

Goals

Strategic 

Objectives Outcomes

Financial

Effectively 

Managed U.S. 

Government 

Finances

Cash resources are available 

to operate the government

• Revenue collected when due 

through a fair and uniform 

application of the law

• Timely and accurate payments at 

the lowest possible cost

• Government financing at the lowest possible 

cost over time

• Effective cash management

• Accurate, timely, useful, 

transparent and accessible 

financial information

Economic

U.S. and World 

Economies Perform 

at Full Economic 

Potential

Improved economic 

opportunity, mobility and 

security with robust, real, 

sustainable economic 

growth at home and abroad

• Strong U.S. economic 

competitiveness

• Competitive capital markets

• Free trade and investment

• Prevented or mitigated financial 

and economic crises

• Decreased gap in global standard 

of living

Trust and confidence in U.S. 

currency worldwide

• Commerce enabled through safe, 

secure U.S. notes and coins

Security

Prevented 

Terrorism and 

Promoted 

the Nation’s 

Security Through 

Strengthened 

International 

Financial Systems

Pre-empted and neutralized 

threats to the international 

financial system and 

enhanced U.S. national 

security

• Removed or reduced threats to 

national security from terrorism, 

proliferation of weapons of 

mass destruction, drug trafficking 

and other criminal activity on 

the part of rogue regimes, 

individuals, and their support 

networks

• Safer and more transparent 

U.S. and international 

financial systems

Management

Management and 

Organizational 

Excellence

Enabled and effective 

Treasury Department

• A citizen-centered, resultsoriented and strategically aligned 

organization

• Exceptional accountability and 

transparency
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

___________ 

No. 23-10463

___________ 

Jennifer VanDerStok; Et al.,

Plaintiffs,

Defense Distributed; Second Amendment Foundation, 

Incorporated,

Intervenor Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his Official capacity as 

Attorney General of the United States; United States Department 

of Justice; Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of 

the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Bureau of 

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,

Defendants—Appellants.

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691 

______________________________ 

CLERK’S OFFICE:

Under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), the appeal is dismissed as of August 

14, 2023, pursuant to appellant’s motion.

Case: 23-10463 Document: 00516857083 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 252 Filed 08/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5034
No. 23-10463

2

 LYLE W. CAYCE

 Clerk of the United States Court

 of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

 

 By: _________________________ 

Melissa V. Mattingly, Deputy Clerk

 ENTERED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COURT

Case: 23-10463 Document: 00516857083 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 252 Filed 08/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5035
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.7
July 20, 2015


Robert Giammatteo
P.O. Box 121
Suffern, NY  10901


Dear Robb:
    


Congratulations on your promotion to Executive Vice President- Chief Financial Officer of ascena!


The following are the terms and conditions of our job offer to you and replace any and all previous offers or discussions concerning your employment.
    
Job Title:            Executive Vice President- Chief Financial Officer of ascena
    
Reporting To:            David Jaffe    
    
Effective Date:            July 26, 2015
    
Annual Pay Rate:        $500,000




In addition, you may be considered for an annual performance evaluation in the Fall of 2016. Any corresponding pay adjustments would be based on your performance, business results, economic & competitive factors, and approval from the Board of Directors.


		
	Incentive Compensation:
	Cash Bonus:  Participation in the Incentive Compensation (IC) program at a target level of 75% of your annual base salary.  Your initial annual target level (100%) is $375,000.  Maximum annual payout is double your target level (200%) ($750,000 at maximum).    


        
You will be eligible for the increased IC target beginning with the Fiscal Fall 2016 Season.  


		
	Stock Awards:
	You will continue to be eligible for an Annual Grant effective in September 2015.   All stock grants are contingent upon the approval from the Board of Directors.  All grants are subject to the Plan Description/Prospectus.  






All above reflects the only changes being made to existing pay and benefits program.

Page 1 of 1    




    
Please sign both copies of this letter, keep one for your records and return one to Donna VanCourt, VP Corporate Compensation and HRIS.


All job information, as well as the pay and benefit programs outlined in this letter and the enclosed materials are subject to change periodically based on business needs.  At Ascena an employment at-will relationship prevails and the employment relationship can be terminated with or without cause and with or without notice, at anytime, by either the employee or the employer.    
    
Once again, congratulations on your new position.
    
Sincerely,                I accept your offer as specified above.




/s/ David Jaffe                /s/ Robert Giammatteo                    




CEO, Ascena Retail Group

Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

QUINTIN-DEMON JONES, ESTATE OF 

LUTHER V. LISTER,

Plaintiff. 

v. No. 4:22-cv-0490-P

BRANCH M. SHEPPARD,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton made Findings, 

Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case on July 7,

2022. ECF No. 12. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s 

FCR is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the FCR for plain 

error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the 

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Conclusions as its own. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendant in the instant case are hereby DISMISSED without 

prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and all pending motions (ECF 

Nos. 3, 8) are hereby DENIED. 

SO ORDERED on this 4th day of August, 2022.

______________________________

Mark T. Pittman

United States District Judge

Case 4:22-cv-00490-P Document 16 Filed 08/04/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 121
#### Andrew L. Provencher et al., Appellants, v Town of Saranac, Respondent.

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Plumadore, J.), entered March 28, 1990 in Clinton County, which, in an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15, determined a certain road in the Town of Saranac to be a public road.

Plaintiffs are the owners of certain premises situate in the Town of Saranac, Clinton County, which border on a dirt road approximately 500 feet in length known as Parsonage Road or Gonang Drive. This road, running generally east and west, connects Upper Saranac Road to State Route 3 and serves as a driveway for plaintiffs and the parsonage of the First Methodist Episcopal Church, the only other dwelling along the road. In early 1989, plaintiffs asserted private ownership of the road and placed a log barrier across the road, posted signs and chained a guard dog nearby to prevent public use of the road and access to the church parsonage therefrom. Defendant responded, contending that it was a town highway, and threatened legal action against plaintiffs if they failed to remove the obstructions and persisted in their claim of title. Plaintiffs commenced this action which resulted in a determination by Supreme Court that the roadway at issue is a public road.

We affirm. There is ample evidence in the record to support the finding of Supreme Court. Testimony of the Town Supervisor, the Town Superintendent of Highways and a former longtime employee of the Town Highway Department established that, for a period of over 10 years, defendant plowed and sanded the road in question during the winter months and performed other work necessary to maintain, care for and improve the road, such as widening, grading and adding Stabmat, a form of gravel, to the surface of the road. Additionally, there was testimony that the road was used by the general public. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Highway Law § 189, Parsonage Road/Gonang Drive is a public road *(see, Stuart v Town of Wells,*161 AD2d 1073; *Matter of Jemzura v Mussision,*161 AD2d 851; *see also, Matter of Hillelson v Grover,*105 AD2d 484).

*771Order affirmed, without costs. Kane J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINTON P. FROST, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

MELANIE ANN PUSTAY; et al., 

Defendants.

No. 19-15579 

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-01240-JCS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 14, 2020**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 

Vinton P. Frost appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 20 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-15579 

his Freedom of Information Act action arising out of the Department of Justice’s

responses to his requests for records. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 

1291. We review de novo whether the magistrate judge validly entered judgment 

on behalf of the district court. Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 502 (9th Cir. 2017). 

We vacate and remand.

Frost consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c). The magistrate judge then dismissed claims against defendants Pustay 

and O’Neill before they had been served. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Because all 

parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to proceed before the 

magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest, see Williams, 875 F.3d at 503-04, we 

vacate the magistrate judge’s May 15, 2017 order and remand for further 

proceedings as to the dismissed claims.

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Frost’s contentions regarding 

summary judgment.

All pending motions and requests are denied. 

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 25 PageID 1711
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 2 of 25 PageID 1712
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 3 of 25 PageID 1713
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 4 of 25 PageID 1714
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 5 of 25 PageID 1715
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 6 of 25 PageID 1716
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 7 of 25 PageID 1717
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 8 of 25 PageID 1718
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 9 of 25 PageID 1719
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 10 of 25 PageID 1720
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 11 of 25 PageID 1721
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 12 of 25 PageID 1722
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 13 of 25 PageID 1723
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 14 of 25 PageID 1724
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 15 of 25 PageID 1725
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 16 of 25 PageID 1726
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 17 of 25 PageID 1727
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 18 of 25 PageID 1728
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 19 of 25 PageID 1729
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 20 of 25 PageID 1730
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 21 of 25 PageID 1731
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 22 of 25 PageID 1732
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 23 of 25 PageID 1733
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 24 of 25 PageID 1734
Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 130 Filed 12/02/22 Page 25 of 25 PageID 1735
Case 4:22-cr-00253-P Document 14 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 352

Designating November 1994 as ‘‘National American Lacemaker Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1994

Mr. FORD of Michigan introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating November 1994 as ‘‘National American

Lacemaker Month’’.

Whereas lacemaking is an ancient craft that dates back to

the 15th century;

Whereas lacemaking has evolved in the United States to become instantly recognizable as an American folk art;

Whereas the intricate handiwork of lace features precision

and detail which make these creations prized possessions;

and

Whereas recognition is due to all artisans in this Nation who

continue to practice the craft of lacemaking, thereby pre-
2

•HJ 352 IH

serving a part of our rich American heritage: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That November 1994 is designated as ‘‘National American

4 Lacemaker Month’’. The President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe such occasion with appro7 priate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 285 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session 

                            H. CON. RES. 285

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                    September 21 (legislative day, September 12), 1994.
      Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives 
(H. Con. Res. 285) entitled ``Concurrent resolution directing the 
Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in the enrollment 
of S. 2182'' do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 1, after line 11, insert:
            (3) In section 132(a)(1)(C), strike out ``(described in 
        subsection (i))'' and insert in lieu thereof ``(described in 
        subsection (h))''.
            (4) In section 924, strike out ``Court of Military Criminal 
        Appeals'' each place it appears and insert in lieu thereof 
        ``Court of Criminal Appeals''.
            (5) In section 1661(b)(4)--
                    (A) strike out ``by adding at the end'' in 
                subparagraph (A) and insert in lieu thereof ``by 
                inserting after section 3020''; and
                    (B) strike out ``by adding at the end'' in 
                subparagraph (B) and insert in lieu thereof ``by 
                inserting after section 8020''.
            (6) In section 2832, strike out ``Authority'' each place it 
        appears (other than in the caption of subsection (b)) and 
        insert in lieu thereof ``Agency''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 22, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-13585

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00309-CR-T-26-EAJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL CHED REED,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 22, 2009)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ched Reed appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a
reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Reed’s § 3582(c)(2)

motion was based on Amendment 706 to the Guidelines, which reduced base

offense levels applicable to crack cocaine. On appeal, Reed argues that he was not

sentenced as a career offender because the district court found that Reed’s career

offender criminal history category of VI overrepresented his prior criminal

conduct, and, therefore, it departed downward, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, to a

criminal history category of IV. Reed attempts to distinguish our decision in

United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, McFadden v.

United States, 129 S.Ct. 965 (2009), and cert. denied, (U.S. Mar. 9, 2009) (No.

08-8554), by arguing that none of the career offender defendants in Moore had

received a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3.

“We review de novo a district court’s conclusions about the scope of its

legal authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).” United States v. James, 548 F.3d

983, 984 (11th Cir. 2008). A district court may not modify a term of imprisonment

unless a defendant was sentenced based on a sentencing range that has

“subsequently been lowered” by the Sentencing Commission. See 18 U.S.C.

§§ 3582(c)(1)(B), (c)(2). Amendment 706, which has been made retroactive,

amends the Drug Quantity Table in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) “to provide a two-level

reduction in base offense levels for crack cocaine offenses.” Moore, 541 F.3d at

2
1325. However, if a defendant is a career offender, his base offense level is

determined under the career offender guideline in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(b) and not the

drug quantity guideline in § 2D1.1(c).

Upon review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we discern no reversible

error. A defendant is only entitled to a § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction if an

amendment actually reduces his applicable guideline range. See Moore, 541 F.3d

at 1327-28. In this case, Amendment 706 did not reduce Reed’s applicable

guideline range because his final offense level was based on the career offender

provisions of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 and not the § 2D1.1 table that Amendment 706

changed. Therefore, because Reed’s applicable guideline range remained

unaffected by Amendment 706, he was not entitled to a sentence reduction under

§ 3582(c)(2). Accordingly, we hereby affirm the district court’s decision.

AFFIRMED.

3