alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Management 
Software Applications

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, 
Control, Communications, and Intelligence DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Standard, ``Design Criteria Standard for Electronic 
Records Management Software Applications'' is being revised. The 
document sets forth mandatory requirements for software applications 
used by Department of Defense organizations to manage their records. 
The current version has been endorsed, with some recommendations, by 
the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for other 
Federal Agency use. A draft of the revised version, which incorporates 
security markings and related issues, as well as the NARA 
recommendations, is available for review and comment.

DATES: Submit comments by January 19, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Download the document and comment form from URL: http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt. Requests and comments may be e-mailed to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba6aabfb8bebeb9b88bada3bee5afa2b8aae5a6a2a7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2845495c5b5d5d5a5b684e405d064c415b4906454144">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Matsuura, telephone (520) 538-
5169.

    Dated: November 14, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-29558 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Fl  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement  dated as  of June 1,2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as GeneralSpecial Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Excluded MortgageLoan Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee,  and  Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar,Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C23 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.       A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; 

MICHAEL G. ANDREN;

TACTICAL MACHINING, LLC;

FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs and Intervenors

and

Not An LLC d/b/a JSD SUPPLY,

Applicant in Intervention,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND; 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; 

STEVEN DETTELBACH; and BUREAU OF 

ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND 

EXPLOSIVES,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-691-O

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NOT AN LLC d/b/a JSD SUPPLY’S 

MOTION TO INTERVENE

Before the Court is Proposed Intervenor Not an LLC d/b/a JSD Supply’s (“JSD”) Motion 

to Intervene (Doc. 149) and Brief in Support (Doc. 150) filed on January 5, 2023. JSD seeks to 

intervene as a Plaintiff in this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), arguing that it 

meets the standard for intervention as a matter of right, and moves in the alternative for permissive 

intervention under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(b). JSD stated that it does not intend to 

seek any delays to the Court’s scheduling order nor raise new or different legal theories and that it 

intends to adopt or join the briefs in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 213-2 Filed 05/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4655
2

JSD states that it seeks intervention as a Plaintiff for the purpose of moving for a 

preliminary injunction against Defendants. Accordingly, JSD submitted with its Motion (1) a 

proposed Complaint (Doc. 149-2); (2) a proposed Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 151) 

and supporting Briefs (Doc. 150 and 152). Both Plaintiffs and Defendants oppose JSD’s Motion 

for Intervention. 

CONCLUSION

Having considered the Motion, briefing, and applicable law, the Court finds that JSD’s 

Motion to Intervene should be and is hereby GRANTED.

JSD shall file its Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction with all due haste.

SO ORDERED on this ___ day of ________________, 2023. 

__________________________________

HON. REED O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 213-2 Filed 05/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4656
#### NOEL et al. v. HARDIN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 13, 1952.

Fred Faulkner, Campbellsville, E. C. Moore and Ira Pittman, Liberty, for appellants.

Montgomery & Montgomery, Liberty, for appellee.

CLAY, Commissioner.

Appellee brought this suit to recover damages for the cutting of timber on land which he claimed. The case was transferred to equity on the question of title.

The controversy concerns the correct location of appellee’s southern line. By agreement of the parties, the court appointed a competent surveyor to locate this *884line. He went on the ground with representatives of both parties and filed a report showing -the disputed area was within ap-pellee’s boundary. The court awarded ap-pellee $100 damages.

On this appeal appellants contend the surveyor appointed ¡by the court made a slight error in his survey. Such alleged error was not clearly established by the evidence in the record. Even though the evidence be conflicting on the principal question in issue, we at least have no more than a doubt with respect to the Chancellor’s finding, and are not inclined to disturb it.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Official Journal L 265/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 265 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6426 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 265

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6426 July 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1214 of 22 July 2021 authorising Poland to prohibit the marketing on its territory of the hemp variety Finola pursuant to Council Directive 2002/53/EC
  (notified under document C(2021) 5295) | 1 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | UN Regulation No 160 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Event Data Recorder [2021/1215] | 3 |
| | * | Decision No 1/2021 of the Joint European Union/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 15 July 2021 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport [2021/1216] | 26 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1214 of 22 July 2021 authorising Poland to prohibit the marketing on its territory of the hemp variety Finola pursuant to Council Directive 2002/53/EC
  (notified under document C(2021) 5295)

(notified under document C(2021) 5295)

1

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

UN Regulation No 160 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Event Data Recorder [2021/1215]

3

*

Decision No 1/2021 of the Joint European Union/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 15 July 2021 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport [2021/1216]

26

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000686

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
STATE OF HAWAII, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARVEY K. KELIIKOA, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

HILO DIVISION (CASE NO. 3DTC-20-021730)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Chan, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On January 18, 2023, the court extended the opening brief deadline to March 31, 2023;

(2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant Harvey Keliikoa (Keliikoa) failed to file the opening brief or request a further extension of time;

(3) On April 5, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing Keliikoa that the time for filing the opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on April 17, 2023, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 30, and Keliikoa could request relief from default by motion; Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-22-0000686 30-MAY-2023 08:04 AM Dkt. 63 ODSDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) The appellate clerk mailed the default notice to Keliikoa at his address on record; and

(5) Keliikoa took no further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 30, 2023. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

2
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000116

22-JUN-2015

10:49 AM
# Official Journal L 319I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 319I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 632 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 319I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 632 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1387 of 2 October 2020 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1388 of 2 October 2020 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus | 13 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1387 of 2 October 2020 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1388 of 2 October 2020 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

13

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00069-Z-BR

§

BLUFORD LEWIS CLARY (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

BLUFORD LEWIS CLARY (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining BLUFORD LEWIS CLARY (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 

11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that BLUFORD LEWIS CLARY (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 1955 - ILLEGAL 

GAMBLING BUSINESS and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District 

Judge,

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☒ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☒ The Government does not oppose release.

☒ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☒ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: December 5, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00069-Z-BR Document 29 Filed 12/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 313

To designate February 1994 as ‘‘National Black History Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1994

Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate February 1994 as ‘‘National Black History

Month’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That February 1994 is designated as ‘‘National Black

4 History Month’’, and the President of the United States

5 is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe such

7 month with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-04-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-01-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                           3,337
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (200)
<INVENTORY>                                     17,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,316
<PP&E>                                          55,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,503
<BONDS>                                          2,938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,004
<SALES>                                         66,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,618
<CGS>                                           43,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (62)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,936
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,480
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,480
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ___________ 

No. 23-10718

___________ 

Jennifer VanDerStok; Michael G. Andren; Tactical 

Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company; Firearms Policy 

Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs—Appellees,

Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing 

business as 80 Percent Arms; Defense Distributed; Second

Amendment Foundation, Incorporated; Not An L.L.C., 

doing business as JSD Supply; Polymer80, Incorporated,

Intervenor Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General; United States 

Department of Justice; Steven Dettelbach, in his official 

capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,

Defendants—Appellants.

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691 

______________________________ 

ORDER:

Case: 23-10718 Document: 00516862676 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 255 Filed 08/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5055
No. 23-10718

2

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of Gun Owners for Safety to file 

an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED.

 LYLE W. CAYCE, CLERK

United States Court of Appeals

 for the Fifth Circuit

 /s/ Lyle W. Cayce

 ENTERED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COURT

Case: 23-10718 Document: 00516862676 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 255 Filed 08/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5056
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-
Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title	:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		May 15, 2006
Case 2:22-cr-00058-Z-BR Document 52 Filed 10/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 173
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

TROY A. PAULEY

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 124 DB 2017 (No. 5 RST 2018)

Attorney Registration No. 202436

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of February, 2018, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 24, 2018, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Troy A. Pauley, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
!"		#	$	!%!&		'!	(		

)		&			*&+)		!,!		+&		,	!""	

&&	(		 !"	(	++	#$			(-&	&,!#&$	!	

#.&$		&	!"	","	+!		(!	!	"!	+!"			*&+	

&"&&	/		.	",	0		)	!&!(	&			!,!	&		,	

!""	&&	(	)	!&!(	++	+	.&,!	!	#.$)		!&!(	

.&,!	!	+!	1	"&!	#.$/		'!	!""&	0	0	!&!(	

!)	&	!,!	,! &	"&	+!	+	","	+		,	!! 	&	

#23&$/		'!	!""&	0	",	23&)	&	!,!	&		&&	&	

45678969:;9<	=:<	>?=@;@:A	>B<@;CD	E9D@F@G=;@C:/4		'!	!""&	0	0	!&!(	

&!	!			","	!! 	&			!(	&!&	!	!	+!&)	

&	!,!	&	!	&&	&	!	4H9I9G;9<4	!	4J:	KC8<)4	!&, (/		'!	

!""&	0!	!&!(			+!"(	!&,	!	L	)	&	!,!	&	

MNC	>G;@C:	O=P9:/Q			

		&	!%!&		!	0		(	!!&	+	","	

!""&			.&-	R"	S,!		3!&&	#RS$/		!&!(	.&	&		

&"	&(&"	#!&!(T&	U		V"	W!,!&	R(&"	#UVWR$$	+!		!,!	

+	","	!""&			RS/		.	)	!&!(	.&	 	!	&&		

UVWR		!!(	! 0		 		!""	","	&&	!!	

	UVWR	(		!! 		 !+&		+0X,	&/			!	

	&	,! 	&	,!	+	&	!,!		&!			&!,&	0	&	!,!		

	RS	!			++!&		!,!	!!/			

	+!"	&		!	&	!,!	&	&		UVWR		T&	!""&	

&	 		000// /		

YZ[
\]	^_[`[a[]	\`	YZ[
	


	

&	!,!	&	)	.)		.	!""&	&&	0	bcdcbedf		

dcgdcbebd	#h	(!&	,!	!&!(T&	!!	!	,($		!"	","	+!		

(!	!	"!	+!"		,	+&	(!	bebg		*&+	&"&&	/		

	!,!	&	+ 	,!&i		

,,1	di		!,!	&		!""&		!	","	&&/		

,,1	bi		!,!	&	.	!""&		!	","	&&/	

,,1	gi		!,!	&	.	!""&		!	","	&&/	

,,1	fi		!	+	&	!,!			.&T	RS&/		

,,1	i		&	+	!("&	&	!	&	!,!/