alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 131 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 131

    Designating December 7 of each year as ``National Pearl Harbor 
                           Remembrance Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

Mr. Sangmeister (for himself, Mr. Bevill, Mr. Brewster, Mr. Bilirakis, 
   Ms. Danner, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Evans, Mr. 
    Fawell, Mr. Franks of Connecticut, Mr. Frost, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. 
  Hastert, Mr. Hefner, Mr. Hochbrueckner, Mr. Hughes, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. 
Kasich, Mr. Kildee, Mr. King, Mr. Lehman, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. McCloskey, 
 Mr. McCandless, Mr. McHugh, Mr. McNulty, Ms. Molinari, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
 Montgomery, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Neal of North Carolina, Mr. Parker, Mr. 
Royce, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Spence, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Waxman, Mr. 
    Wheat, Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Wolf) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Designating December 7 of each year as ``National Pearl Harbor 
                           Remembrance Day''.

Whereas, on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy and Air Force attacked 
        units of the armed forces of the United States stationed at Pearl 
        Harbor, Hawaii;
Whereas more than 2,000 citizens of the United States were killed and more than 
        1,000 citizens of the United States were wounded in the attack on Pearl 
        Harbor;
Whereas the attack on Pearl Harbor marked the entry of the United States into 
        World War II;
Whereas, the veterans of World War II and all other people of the United States 
        commemorate December 7 in remembrance of the attack on Pearl Harbor; and
Whereas commemoration of the attack on Pearl Harbor will instill in all people 
        of the United States a greater understanding and appreciation of the 
        selfless sacrifice of the individuals who served in the armed forces of 
        the United States during World War II: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That December 7 of each year 
is designated as ``National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day'' and the 
President is authorized and requested--
            (1) to issue annually a proclamation calling on the people 
        of the United States to observe the day with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities; and
            (2) to urge all Federal agencies, and interested 
        organizations, groups, and individuals, to fly the flag of the 
        United States at halfstaff each December 7 in honor of the 
        individuals who died as a result of their service at Pearl 
        Harbor.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-361-000]


Consumers Energy Company; Notice of Filing

November 13, 2000.

    Take notice that on November 3, 2000, Consumers Energy Company 
(Consumers), tendered for filing an executed Non-Firm Point to Point 
Transmission Service Agreement with Midland Cogeneration Venture 
Limited Partnership (Customer) pursuant to the Joint Open Access 
Transmission Service Tariff filed on December 31, 1996 by Consumers and 
The Detroit Edison Company (Detroit Edison).
    The agreement has an effective date of October 25, 2000.
    Copies of the filed agreement were served upon the Michigan Public 
Service Commission, Detroit Edison, and the Customer.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before November 24, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29590 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO. 1:22-CR-00018-H-BU

§

IVAN FLORES (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA OF GUILTY

BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant, IVAN FLORES (1), by consent and under the authority of United States v. 

Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge for the purpose of entering a plea of guilty under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. 

Defendant was placed under oath and personally examined in open court by the 

undersigned concerning the subjects in Rule 11(b)(1) and the undersigned determined that 

Defendant understood each subject.

Defendant pleaded guilty, under a plea bargain agreement with the government, to Count

2 of the 2-count Indictment charging defendant with a violation 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 

841(b)(1)(A)(i) Possession with Intent to Distribute One Kilogram or More of Heroin. After 

examining Defendant under oath, the undersigned magistrate judge finds the following:

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing to enter this 

guilty plea before a magistrate judge subject to final approval and sentencing by the 

presiding district judge;

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges, including each essential 

element of the offense(s) charged, and the associated penalties;

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea agreement 

supplement;

Case 1:22-cr-00018-H-BU Document 44 Filed 06/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 100
4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes to waive those 

rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right to appear before a United States 

district judge;

5. Defendant’s plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty;

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea of guilty; and

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of Defendant’s plea of guilty.

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant’s plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and accepted Defendant’s plea of guilty, the 

United States district judge has the power to review my actions and possesses final decisionmaking authority in this proceeding. Thus, if Defendant has any objections to these findings or 

any other action of the undersigned, he is required to make those known to the United States district 

judge within fourteen (14) days of today. 

 The Clerk will furnish a copy of this Order to each of attorney of record. 

 Signed on: 2nd day of June, 2022. 

 _____________________________________ 

 JOHN R. PARKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-00018-H-BU Document 44 Filed 06/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 101
Case 4:22-cr-00182-O Document 22 Filed 05/13/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 41
Case 4:22-cr-00182-O Document 22 Filed 05/13/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 42
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 191 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 191

 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                            of Joyce Kilmer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1993

    Mrs. Byrne introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                            of Joyce Kilmer.

Whereas Joyce Kilmer inspired lovers of poetry the world over through his 
        positive prose;
Whereas Joyce Kilmer, a symbol of twentieth century American culture, has 
        enriched the art of poetry;
Whereas Joyce Kilmer authored countless poems that hold fast in many memories 
        which ring true to this day;
Whereas he valiantly served his country during World War I, first as a volunteer 
        in the Sixty-Ninth Regiment, United States Army National Guard;
Whereas he served as a member of the ``Irish Brigade,'' which had a long and 
        rich line of service in the history of our nation and was among the 
        first to battle in France;
Whereas Joyce Kilmer, struck by the tragedy of the sinking of the Lusitania on 
        May 7, 1915, opined in one of his greatest poems ``The White Ships and 
        the Red,'' the sorrow and the tragedy that is war;
Whereas Joyce Kilmer, at his request, was transferred to the Regimental 
        Intelligence Section and bravely served with distinction as a scout on 
        the front lines;
Whereas Joyce Kilmer was awarded Croix de Guerre for bravery under fire;
Whereas Joyce Kilmer, poet laureate and defender of freedom, died in action, 
        July 30, 1918; and
Whereas Joyce Kilmer's appreciation for peace, nature and love, as most widely 
        recognized in his sonnet entitled ``Trees,'' served to underscore the 
        innocence and beauty that symbolized a freedom-loving America: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Postmaster General 
shall issue a commemorative stamp in honor of Joyce Kilmer. Such a 
stamp shall be issued and sold for such period as the Postmaster 
General shall determine.

                                 <all>
```
| **Exhibit  3.01** |
|-------------------|

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF THE

AMENDEDAND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

NEOPHARM,INC.

                NeoPharm, Inc., (hereinaftercalled the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and byvirtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does herebycertify:

1.                                       The name of theCorporation is NeoPharm, Inc.

2.             The Amended andRestated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended bystriking out Article FOURTH thereof and by substituting in lieu of said Articlethe following new Article FOURTH:

“ARTICLE FOURTH:  The totalnumber of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation shallhave the authority to issue is 65,000,000 shares, consisting of 50,000,000shares of common stock, par value $.0002145 per share (the “Common Stock”), and15,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share (the “PreferredStock”).

The Board of Directors is authorized to issue the Preferred Stock fromtime to time in one or more classes or series thereof, each such class orseries to have such voting powers (if any), conversion rights (if any),designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or otherspecial rights, and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof,as shall be determined by the Board of Directors and stated and expressed in aresolution or resolutions thereof providing for the issuance of such PreferredStock.”

3.             The amendment ofthe Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has beenduly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the GeneralCorporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNES WHEREOF, theCorporation has caused this Certificate to be executed this 6th dayof June, 2002.

 
|    | NEOPHARM, INC.                            |
|---------|-------------------------------------------|
|    |                                      |   |
|    | By:                                       | /s/ James M. Hussey |
|    |                                      | James M. Hussey |
|    |                                      | Chief Executive Officer |
|    |                                      | and President |
| ATTEST: |                                      |
|    |                                      |   |
| By:     |    /s/ Lawrence A. Kenyon, Secretary |   |   |
|    | Lawrence A. Kenyon, Secretary             |   |
|    |                                      |   |
|    |                                      |
|         |                                           |  |  |  |  |

 

 

----
----

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-98/04) (1)

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment - Project carried out without prior application for development consent or assessment - Action inadmissible)

(2006/C 165/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Shotter and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: K. Manji, and subsequently by M. Bethell, Agents, and by P. Sales and J. Maurici, Barristers)

Re:

Infringement of Article 2(1) and Article 4 of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ 1985 L 175, p. 40), as amended by Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 (OJ 1997 L 73, p. 5) — Consent given without assessment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

----
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1,2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNRPARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC,as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, COMM 2015-CCRE24 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized termsused herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.           Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Cite as State ex rel. Akram v. Berens , 2016-Ohio-133.]

aCOURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., ALEEM AKRAM

Relator

-vsJUDGE RICHARD E. BERENS Respondent JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.

Case No. 15-CA-62

O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Procedendo

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: January 13, 2016

APPEARANCES:

For Relator For Respondent

ALEEM AKRAM #676-949 No Appearance Pickaway Correctional Institute P.O. Box 209 Orient, Ohio 43146Fairfield County, Case No. 15-CA-62 2

Hoffman, P.J.

{¶1} Relator, Aleem Akram, has filed a Petition for Writ of Procedendo. Relator requests Respondent be ordered to rule on a motion filed in the trial court on June 4, 2015. On December 10, 2015 Respondent ruled upon the motion. {¶2} To be entitled to a writ of procedendo, “a relator must establish a clear legal right to require the court to proceed, a clear legal duty on the part of the court to proceed, and the lack of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” Miley, supra, at 65, citing State ex rel. Sherrills v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 461, 462. The Supreme Court has noted, “The writ of procedendo is merely an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to one of inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment. It does not in any case attempt to control the inferior court as to what that judgment should be.” State ex rel. Davey v. Owen, 133 Ohio St. 96, *106, 12 N.E.2d 144, * *149 (1937). {¶3} The Supreme Court has held procedendo will not issue where the requested relief has been obtained, “Neither procedendo nor mandamus will compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed.” State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen, 88 Ohio St.3d 313, 318, 725 N.E.2d 663, 668 (Ohio, 2000). {¶4} Because Respondent has issued a ruling on Relator’s motion, the request for a writ of procedendo has become moot. For this reason, the Petition for Writ of

Procedendo is dismissed. {¶5} PETITION DISMISSED. {¶6} COSTS WAIVED.Fairfield County, Case No. 15-CA-62 3

{¶7} IT IS SO ORDERED.

By: Hoffman, P.J. Farmer, J. and Delaney, J. concur
Case 1:22-cr-00048-H-BU Document 26 Filed 10/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 47
Case 1:22-cr-00048-H-BU Document 26 Filed 10/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 48
# Official Journal C 411/18 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 411 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5718 November 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 411

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5718 November 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 411/01 | Financial activity report 2013 — Section II — European Council and Council | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 411/01

Financial activity report 2013 — Section II — European Council and Council

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### SHELTON v. STATE.

No. 25520.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty.,' of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft of an automobile over the value of $50.00. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 10 years.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial. The evidence introduced by the State fully supports the conviction.

No complaints of any matters of procedure have been brought forward by bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,481
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,951
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          34,176
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            33,775
<LOANS>                                        119,202
<ALLOWANCE>                                        676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,841
<DEPOSITS>                                     144,374
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,534
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               15
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 168,841
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,309
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  591
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    67
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,967
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,548
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,419
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    357
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         357
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.57
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,030
<LOANS-PAST>                                        21
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   642
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2
<RECOVERIES>                                         6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  676
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               393
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            283
        

</TABLE>