alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00089-Z-BR

§

AARON HUTCHESON (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

AARON HUTCHESON (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining AARON HUTCHESON (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that AARON HUTCHESON (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) -

POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and have sentence imposed accordingly. After 

being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: October 5, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00089-Z-BR Document 64 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 132
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD07-00-111] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the Siesta Key Drawbridge (SR 758) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 71.6, Sarasota, Sarasota County, Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge owner to provide single leaf openings for vessel traffic. This temporary deviation is required November 22, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m., to allow the bridge owner to safely complete maintenance to the drawbridge. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective on November 22, 2000, from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-6743. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Siesta Key Drawbridge (SR 758) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sarasota, FL has a vertical clearance of 21 feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the center in the closed position. On October 30, 2000 the owner, requested a deviation from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.35 which requires the drawbridge to open promptly and fully when a request to open is given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary maintenance to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive manner. 

                    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the operating requirements listed in 33 CFR                           ( print page 68895)                        117.35 for the purpose of maintenance of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Siesta Key Drawbridge (SR 758) need only provide single leaf openings. The deviation is effective on November 22, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m.                 

Dated: November 7, 2000. 

G.E. Shapley, 

Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 00-29101 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
#### Charles H. WYNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23035.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 6, 1944.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Forgery is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant’s personal affidavit evidences the fact that he wishes to withdraw his appeal.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregory R.L. Smith, certify that:



1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Image Sensing Systems, Inc.;



2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.         The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.         The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 2, 2007

/s/ Gregory R.L. SmithName: Gregory R.L. SmithTitle: Chief Financial Officer






---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted for the three
months ended April 2, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                     132,162,000
<SECURITIES>                                21,946,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,563,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,417,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           206,457,000
<PP&E>                                     157,229,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              69,641,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             317,572,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,763,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       298,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 291,074,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               317,572,000
<SALES>                                     43,005,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,005,000
<CGS>                                       21,633,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,633,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,926,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,049,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (2,499,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,794,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,254,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,540,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,540,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00013-Z-BR

§

MICHAEL ROBERT MIMS (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

MICHAEL ROBERT MIMS (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining MICHAEL ROBERT MIMS (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 

11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that MICHAEL ROBERT MIMS (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) 

- POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE FENTANYL and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being 

found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: July 11, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00013-Z-BR Document 33 Filed 07/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 79
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0725 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-207-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 17, 2015

CONTACT: Rob Friedlander, Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2015

WASHINGTON – The Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) today convened for a 

meeting via telephone.

During the meeting, the Council discussed its second annual review of its designation of 

Prudential Financial, Inc. for enhanced prudential standards and supervision by the Board of 

Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Council designated Prudential in September 

2013 and notified the company of its annual review in April 2015. As part of the annual review, 

staff of Council members and member agencies met with the company to discuss the review, 

considered information submitted by the company, and consulted with certain of the company’s 

regulators. 

After the meeting, the Council voted by notational vote not to rescind the designation of 

Prudential and provided the company and certain of its regulators with a notice explaining the 

primary bases for the Council’s decision not to rescind the designation. The notice addresses the 

material factors raised by the company in its submissions to the Council contesting the 

determination during the annual reevaluation. As a general matter, if the Council determines in 

an annual review that a company has addressed the key factors in the Council’s basis for its 

designation, the Council would rescind the designation.

Finally, the Council voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on November 2.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved meeting 

minutes are available at http://www.fsoc.gov. 

###
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation Date Staff Contact 

Information (Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.) 

Written CProvided? Did they asubmit to 

June 30, 2010 (telephone correspondence) 

Paul Stewart, ICF International, 202-862-1135, pstewart@icfi.com

on behalf of EPA under Contract EP-W-07-068, Task Order 68 

Oncor (participants were Ray Averitt, Lauren Casey, and Deborah Boyle via Debra Boyle’s direct phone line at 214-486-2022) 

Call was to discuss the scales currently in use at Oncor as well as the content of Oncor’s public comments submitted to docket EPA-HQ-OAR2009-0506 and EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927. The following is key information provided by Oncor: 

 They do not currently use scales with 

high accuracy and precision. The scales they currently use are the generic kind you would find at a department store and aren’t necessarily made for weighing cylinders. 

 Although they recommended 2 pound 

absolute scale accuracy requirements in their public comments, they do not have experience using scales with this accuracy. Their recommendation was based on research they performed on the price of scales and their opinions on what level of accuracy is reasonable for measuring mass-balance inputs.

Yes, writtcomments submitted EPA-HQ-2009-050EPA-HQ-2009-0927 this meetioccurred.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 329

Designating March 23, 1994, as ‘‘Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 23 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating March 23, 1994, as ‘‘Education and Sharing

Day, U.S.A.’’.

Whereas the Congress recognizes that ethical teachings and

values have played a prominent role in the foundation of

civilization and in the history of our great Nation;

Whereas President William J. Clinton has indicated that ethical considerations should inform the decisions of Society;

Whereas ethical teachings and values have formed the cornerstone of society since the dawn of civilization and found

expression in the Seven Noahide Laws;

Whereas sharing and education represent 2 pillars of these

laws and ethical conduct;
2

•HJ 329 RDS

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of

the Lubavitch movement, is revered worldwide for the

contributions he has made to education and sharing;

Whereas the over 2,000 educational, social, and rehabilitative

centers administered by the Lubavitch movement advance

these ideals for the millions of people whom they serve

each year;

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson has interpreted, in the miraculous events of our times, the increasing vitality of these ideals for the furtherance of human

understanding and betterment;

Whereas the extraordinary life and work of Rabbi Menachem

Mendel Schneerson have long been acknowledged by the

Congress through the enactment of joint resolutions designating his birthday in each of the last 16 years as

‘‘Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.’’;

Whereas the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s 92nd birthday falls on

March 23, 1994;

Whereas in tribute to this esteemed spiritual leader, the

Lubavitcher Rebbe’s birthday will be designated as ‘‘Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.; and

Whereas such designation will signal a renewal of our

Nation’s commitment to greater acts of charity, to an

enriched emphasis on education, and to the furtherance of ethical teachings and values in the affairs of

government and in the lives of our citizens: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That March 23, 1994, the 92nd birthday of the Rabbi
3

•HJ 329 RDS

1 Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the worldwide

2 Lubavitch movement, is designated as ‘‘Education and

3 Sharing Day, U.S.A.’’. The President is requested to issue

4 a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

5 States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies

6 and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
# SUMMARY:

 The National Science Foundation modified a permit to conduct activities regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-541).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Joyce Jatko, Office of Polar Programs, Room 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# DESCRIPTION OF PERMIT AND MODIFICATION: 

                        On September 25, 1998, the National Science Foundation issued a permit (ACA #99-010) to Dr. Rennie S. Holt after posting a notice in the August 27, 1998                         **Federal Register**                        . No public comments were received. A request to modify the permit was posted in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 23, 1999. No public comments were received. The modification, issued by the Foundation on January 27, 2000, allows for tooth extraction from up to 100 adult Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) per year for age determination. The tooth extractions will be taken from animals already captured for other permitted procedures. This is part of an ongoing study of Antarctic fur seals by the U.S. Antarctic Marine Living Resources (AMLR) Program.                    

# LOCATION: 

Cape Shirreff, Livingston Island (ASPA #149), the South Shetland Islands, Antarctic Peninsula.

# DATES: 

January 10, 2000-April 1, 2001.

Joyce Jatko,

Acting Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-2925  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M