alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00326-L

§

BARON WAYNE BENNETT (5) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

BARON WAYNE BENNETT, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) 13 of the Superseding 

Indictment After cautioning and examining BARON WAYNE BENNETT under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea(s) was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged 

is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea(s) of guilty be accepted, and that BARON WAYNE BENNETT be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, namely Possession With the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance; Aiding 

and Abetting and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

Date: 16th day of July, 2024 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service 

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District 

Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

FILED

KAREN MITCHELL

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT 

COURT July 16, 2024

Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 463 Filed 07/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1511
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,302
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              23
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,234
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,044
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,136
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,220
<LOANS>                                         52,063
<ALLOWANCE>                                        728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,425
<DEPOSITS>                                      61,922
<SHORT-TERM>                                       419
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,427
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           298
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  71,425
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,521
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  343
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   228
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,092
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,421
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,493
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      156
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    696
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.05
<LOANS-NON>                                        284
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   191
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   576
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       16
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  728
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               728
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; MICHAEL 

G. ANDREN; TACTICAL MACHINING 

LLC, a limited liability company; 

FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, 

INC., a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC., doing business as 80 

PERCENT ARMS,

Intervenor Plaintiff, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, in his Official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; STEVEN 

DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as 

Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Clarification (ECF No. 108), filed 

October 28, 2022 in response to the Court’s Order (ECF No. 107), issued October 25, 2022, 

regarding supplemental briefing on Rule 65(a)(2) consolidation of the Plaintiffs’ statutory 

interpretation claims. The parties request clarification about their deadline to file supplemental 

briefing. The Court GRANTS the motion (ECF No. 108) and CLARIFIES that the parties’ 

supplemental briefing is due either 14 days after the Court resolves any pending motion to 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 110 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1436
2

supplement the Administrative Record and such supplemental records, where required, are 

produced, or no later than November 28, 2022, if no such motion is filed.

SO ORDERED this 31st day of October, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 110 Filed 10/31/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1437
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 224 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 224

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                      prohibit the death penalty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

   Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                      prohibit the death penalty.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``The death penalty shall not be imposed or executed by the United 
States, or by any State, Territory or other jurisdiction within the 
United States.''.

                                 <all>
```
From: Patrick Kelly <kellyp@api.org>

To: Julia MacAllister/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: OTAQ@EPA

Date: 02/14/2013 01:23 PM

Subject: Request for Public Hearing EPA

- HQ

- 2012

- 0546

Julia,

API requests a public hearing be held regarding the Proposed Rule published in the Federal Register on

February 7 th titled: Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: 2013 Renewable Fuel Standards (Docket ID No.

EPA

- HQ

- 2012

- 0546).

Please provide your ackno wledgement that this note meets the requirements for a request for a

hearing; otherwise please inform me of the proper protocol.

Regards,

Patrick Kelly

Senior Policy Advisor

(202) 682

- 8192

www.api.org
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC., et al., 

Intervenor Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc.’s Opposed Emergency Motion 

to Clarify the Status of Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 251), filed August 14, 2023. The Court 

ORDERS Defendants to respond to this motion no later than August 17, 2023. Blackhawk may 

reply no later than August 21, 2023. 

SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 253 Filed 08/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5037
Exhibit
13.1



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of WINS Finance Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify,
to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended June 30, 2016 of the Company fully complies, in all
material respects, with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                 | WINS FINANCE HOLDINGS INC.                                                                 
|---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |                                                                                            
|October 21, 2016 | By:                                                                                        
|                 | Name:                                                                                      
|                 | Title:                                                                                     
|                 |                                                                                            
|                 |                                                                                            
|                 | By:                                                                                        
|                 | Name:                                                                                      
|                 | Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                 |                                                                                            
|October 21, 2016 | By:                                                                                        
|                 | Name:                                                                                      
|                 | Title:                                                                                     
|                 |
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C29 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as General SpecialServicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, BellOak, LLC as Trust Advisor,CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, ComputershareTrust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCertificate Administrator, Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian, LNR Partners, LLC, asSpecial Servicer of the Brickyard Square Mortgage Loan prior to April 24, 2023,Greystone Servicing Company LLC, as Special Servicer of the Brickyard SquareMortgage Loan on and after April 24, 2023, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee for the Brickyard Square Mortgage Loan, Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Trust Advisor for the Brickyard Square Mortgage Loan, CoreLogicSolutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the Brickyard SquareMortgage Loan, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Custodian for the Brickyard SquareMortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 13, 2024

 

 

/s/Anthony Sfarra

AnthonySfarra 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 417 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 417

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
   Providing for temporary extension of the application of the final 
 paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act with respect to the 
   dispute between the Soo Line Railroad Company and certain of its 
                               employees.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PROHIBITION.

    The final paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act (45 
U.S.C. 160) shall apply and be extended through February 28, 1995, with 
respect to the dispute referred to in Executive Order No. 12925 of 
August 29, 1994. During this extension period no change, except by 
agreement, shall be made by the rail carrier, the Soo Line Railroad 
Company, or by the employees of such carrier represented by the United 
Transportation Union, in the conditions out of which the dispute arose 
as such conditions existed before July 14, 1994.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 417

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Providing for temporary extension of the application of the final 
 paragraph of section 10 of the Railway Labor Act with respect to the 
   dispute between the Soo Line Railroad Company and certain of its 
                               employees.`
<PAGE>

                     32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund II,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen
----------------------------------
Kimberly A. Springsteen
Principal Financial Officer
August 14, 2006


                                                                              19
#### HARPER v. STATE.

No. 21658.

June 25, 1941.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

No attorney for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for felony embezzlement, punishment assessed being four years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 35.3












ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2015-LC21

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of June 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association,
as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender
Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7112

JAMAR T. SCOTT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA KELLY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-01127-AJT-TRJ)

Submitted: February 13, 2012 Decided: March 2, 2012

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamar T. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Mikell Didlake, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamar T. Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Scott has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. We deny Scott’s motion for appointment 

of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED