alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 59/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 59 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5014 March 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 59

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5014 March 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 059/01 | Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.3333 — Sony/BMG) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 059/01

Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.3333 — Sony/BMG) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 059/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2007/C 059/03 | Commission Communication on the titles of technical regulations | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 059/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2007/C 059/03

Commission Communication on the titles of technical regulations

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 059/04 | Communication from the French Government concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (Notice regarding an application for an exclusive licence to prospect for oil and gas, designated the ‘Permis du Pays de Saulnois’)
   (1) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2007/C 059/04

Communication from the French Government concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (Notice regarding an application for an exclusive licence to prospect for oil and gas, designated the ‘Permis du Pays de Saulnois’)
   (1)

(Notice regarding an application for an exclusive licence to prospect for oil and gas, designated the ‘Permis du Pays de Saulnois’)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET 

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) 

R Brent Cooper 

Cooper & Scully PC 

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 

Dallas, TX 75202 

214-712-9501 

Fax: 214-712-9540 

Email: brent.cooper@cooperscully.com 

Benjamin David Passey 

Cooper & Scully PC 

900 Jackson Street 

Suite 100 

Dallas, TX 75202 

214-712-9500 

Fax: 214-712-9540 

Email: ben.passey@cooperscully.com 

Cody J Wisniewski 

Firearms Policy Coalition Inc 

5550 Painted Mirage Road, Suite 320 

Las Vegas, NV 89149 

916-378-5785 

Fax: 916-476-2392 

Email: cwi@fpchq.org 

PRO HAC VICE 

Erin M Erhardt 

Mountain States Legal Foundation 

2596 S Lewis Way 

Lakewood, CO 80227 

303-292-2021 

Fax: 877-349-7074 

Email: eerhardt@mslegal.org 

Kaitlyn D Schiraldi 

Mountain States Legal Foundation 

2596 South Lewis Way 

Lakewood, CO 80227 

303-292-2021 

Fax: 877-349-7074 

Email: kschiraldi@mslegal.org 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 99-2 Filed 10/20/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1329
PRO HAC VICE 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Brian D. Poe 

TX Bar No. 24056908 

BRIAN D. POE, ATTORNEY AT LAW PLLC 

The Bryce Building 

909 Throckmorton Street 

Fort Worth, TX 76102 

Phone: (817) 870-2022 

Fax: (817) 977-6501 

bpoe@bpoelaw.com 

Michael J. Sullivan 

Pro Hac Vice, MA Bar No. 487210 

ASHCROFT LAW FIRM LLC 

200 State Street, 7th Floor 

Boston, MA 02109 

Phone: (617) 573-9400 

Fax: (617) 933-7607 

msullivan@ashcroftlawfirm.com 

J. Christopher Amrhein, Jr. 

Pro Hac Vice, MA Bar No. 703170 

ASHCROFT LAW FIRM LLC 

200 State Street, 7th Floor 

Boston, MA 02109 

Phone: (617) 573-9400 

Fax: (617) 933-7607 

camrhein@ashcroftlawfirm.com 

Nathan P. Brennan 

Pro Hac Vice, MN Bar No. 389954 

ASHCROFT LAW FIRM LLC 

200 State Street, 7th Floor 

Boston, MA 02109 

Phone: (617) 573-9400 

Fax: (617) 933-7607 

nbrennan@ashcroftlawfirm.com 

Counsel for Intervenor-Plaintiff BlackHawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 99-2 Filed 10/20/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1330
Daniel M Riess 

US Department of Justice - Civil Division 

1100 L Street NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202/353-3098 

Fax: 202/616-8460 

Email: Daniel.Riess@usdoj.gov 

Martin M Tomlinson 

DOJ-Civ 

Civil Division 

1100 L St., N.W. 

Room 12504 

Washington, DC 20530 

202-353-4556 

Email: martin.m.tomlinson@usdoj.gov 

Taisa M. Goodnature 

DOJ-Civ 

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 

1100 L St. NW 

Washington, DC 20530 

202-514-3786 

Fax: 202-616-8470 

Email: taisa.m.goodnature@usdoj.gov 

Counsel for Defendants 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 99-2 Filed 10/20/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1331
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

------------------------------------------------------- X

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

X

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

-------------------------------------------------------

ORDER

Before the Court is prospective amici curiae Gun Violence Prevention Groups’ 

Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel [ECF No. ___], filed August 30, 

2022. Having considered the motion, and noting that it is unopposed by Plaintiffs, 

the Court finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that prospective amici curiae Gun Violence 

Prevention Groups’ counsel is required to fulfill all local counsel requirements and 

abide by all local rules of this Court, including the standards of litigation conduct set 

forth in Dondi Properties Corporation v. Commerce Savings & Loan Association, 121 

F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988) (per curiam). The Court further advises that if 

proceeding without local counsel disrupts this litigation or otherwise results in failure 

to comply with the rules of this Court, prospective amici curiae Gun Violence 

Prevention Groups will be required to immediately obtain local counsel.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 43-1 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 522
2

SO ORDERED on this ___ day of ____________________, 2022.

REED C. O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 43-1 Filed 08/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 523
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3521 — BRIDGEPOINT/PETS AT HOME GROUP)

(2004/C 248/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
H. J. Res. 303

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Joint Resolution

To designate June 6, 1994, as ‘‘D-Day National Remembrance Day’’.

Whereas June 6, 1994, marks the fiftieth anniversary of D-Day,

the day of the beginning of the Allied assault at Normandy,

France, during World War II;

Whereas the D-Day assault, known as Operation Overlord, was

the most extensive amphibious operation ever to occur, involving

on the first day of the operation five thousand ships, over eleven

thousand sorties of Allied aircraft, and one hundred and fiftythree thousand American, British, and Canadian troops;

Whereas five separate beaches were assaulted, with American forces

commanded by Lieutenant General Omar Bradley attacking

Omaha and Utah beaches and British and Canadian forces commanded by General Miles Dempsey attacking Gold, Juno, and

Sword beaches;

Whereas American troops suffered significant losses during the

assault, including over six thousand five hundred casualties;

Whereas the D-Day assault was among the most critical events

of World War II, with the success of the Allied landings in

Normandy providing the foothold for the liberation of France

and the eventual Allied breakthrough into Germany and leading

ultimately to the Allied victory in Europe; and

Whereas June 6, 1944, is one of the most significant dates in

the history of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That June 6,

1994, is designated as ‘‘D-Day National Remembrance Day’’, and

the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
H. J. Res. 303—2

calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day

with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 130 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 130

  To designate the week of March 21, 1993, through March 27, 1993, as 
               ``International Student Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

   Mr. Hansen (for himself, Mr. Kasich, Mr. Filner, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
   Doolittle, Mr. Orton, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Martinez) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate the week of March 21, 1993, through March 27, 1993, as 
               ``International Student Awareness Week''.

Whereas international student exchange programs provide students with an 
        enriched and improved quality of life through first-hand experience with 
        different cultures;
Whereas international student exchange programs provide fertile training ground 
        for future world leaders;
Whereas international student exchange programs make enormous strides toward 
        world peace through understanding;
Whereas international student exchange programs enrich a student's understanding 
        of the United States and its communities; and
Whereas the United States recognizes the need for an increased awareness of such 
        valuable programs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of March 21, 
1993, through March 27, 1993, is designated as ``International Student 
Awareness Week''. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe 
the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cv-03279-C-BK Document 15 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20825 Conference Calendar

SUZANNE FRAME ET AL., Plaintiffs, SUZANNE FRAME, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ALLAN JAMES ET AL., Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus S-H, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-86-4589

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction on our own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5thNo. 96-20825 -2- Cir. 1987). The district court’s order declining to disqualify the appellees’ attorney, declining to cancel the bi-weekly reporting requirement imposed on appellant Suzanne Frame, and declining to vacate orders designating Frame’s alter egos is not within the category of orders regarding receiverships that is reviewable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(2). The record does not indicate that the portion of the district court’s order regarding the bi-weekly reporting requirement is the type of discovery order that is appealable. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Energy Gathering, Inc. , 2 F.3d 1397, 1405 n.16 (5th Cir. 1993). Nor does the record indicate that Frame would lose the opportunity for appellate review of her contentions regarding the appellees’ attorney and the designation of her alter egos in a later appeal from a conclusive judgment in the judgment creditors’ attempt to collect on the judgment against her should we now decline to consider her contentions. We lack jurisdiction to consider Frame’s contentions. Frame’s appeal is frivolous and is part of a pattern of abuse of the appeal process. We caution Frame that any additional frivolous appeals filed by her or on her behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Frame is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 174 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 174

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 1 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

                    Received and read the first time

                             April 19, 1993

                          Read the second time

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
           Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That subsection (b) of section 
3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the 
dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu 
thereof $4,731,900,000,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 31, 1993.

            Attest:

                                            DONNALD K. ANDERSON

                                                                 Clerk.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1

 

Second Amendment to

Employment Agreement

 

This Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) is effective as of the 10th day of September, 2015, between Kenneth E. Murphy III, an individual (“Executive”), Mattress Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation (“MHC”), and Mattress Firm Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation (“MFRM”).

 

WHEREAS, Executive, MHC and MFRM are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated August 4, 2014, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 4, 2014 (as so amended, the “Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain amendments to the Agreement as set forth herein;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises of the parties set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.              Amendments.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 

a.              The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“During the Term (as defined below), the Executive shall serve as President of the Company and shall report to the Chief Executive Officer, and be subject to the direction and control of, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.”

 

2.              No Other Modifications.  Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

 

3.              Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to the conflicts of laws principles thereof.

 

4.              Counterparts.  This Amendment may be in executed in counterparts, each of which is deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Amendment may be executed or delivered by electronic or facsimile means, and electronic or facsimile copies of executed signature pages shall be binding as originals.

 

(Signatures on following page.)

 

Second Amendment to Murphy Employment Agreement

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.

 

	
 
    	
Mattress   Holding Corp.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Steve Stagner
    
	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
Steve   Stagner
    
	
 
    	
Title:   
    	
President
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Mattress   Firm Holding Corp.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Steve Stagner
    
	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
Steve   Stagner
    
	
 
    	
Title:   
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Kenneth E. Murphy III
    
	
 
    	
Kenneth   E. Murphy III
    


 

2
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 28, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A1770. EDDIE BERNARD JACOBS, SR. v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On August 23, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than September 02, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 28, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          46,250
<SECURITIES>                                    21,976
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,600
<PP&E>                                          24,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,907
<BONDS>                                          8,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,155
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,937)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDIVISION

TINITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-067-01-H

JULTAN CESARTORRES, JR. (1),

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE I,JNTTED STATES MAGISTRATE JI]DGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bxl), the undersigned Disuict Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SOORDERED,

DatedDecemb ", 11, zozz.

JAME LEYHENDRIX

II^IE STATES DISTRICTruDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00067-H-BQ Document 38 Filed 12/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 83