alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Betancourt, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered on April 25, 1989, which convicted defendant, following a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced him, as a predicate felon, to a term of imprisonment of from *AV2*to 9 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was arrested as the result of his participation in the sale of one vial of crack cocaine to an undercover narcotics officer conducting a "buy-and-bust” operation. In that regard, defendant, who was distinctively dressed, handed the officer the cocaine after she gave $10 in prerecorded buy money to defendant’s accomplice. She then made a confirmatory identification of defendant at the scene within 20 to 25 minutes of the transaction. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as we are required to do *(People v Tejeda, 73*NY2d 958), it is clear that the proof was sufficient to support defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, there is simply no basis apparent in the record which would warrant setting aside the jury’s crediting of the officer’s testimony *(see, People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932).

As for defendant’s contention that information concerning the confirmatory identification was not included in the voluntary disclosure form furnished to defense counsel, this omission certainly does not mandate reversal of defendant’s conviction. Defendant was not at all prejudiced thereby, and, in any event, it is undisputed that the prosecution did provide advance notice of the confirmatory identification. Where, as in the situation herein, there is a confirmatory identification by a trained narcotics officer shortly after a narcotics purchase, a *Wade*hearing is not required *(People v Wharton,*74 NY2d 921). Under such circumstances, the observation by the officer merely constitutes an "ordinary and proper completion of an integral police procedure” *(People v Wharton, supra,*at 922-923). Finally, we have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas and Smith, JJ.
To: Christopher Starnes MD AME April 16, 2015

From: Drone Services Hawaii Subject: Authorization Letter

This letter is to authorize George K. Purdy, of Drone Services Hawaii, 98-1827A Kaahumanu St., Aiea, Hi 96701, Cell phone (808)559-0175, Phone (808)225-2968, Fax (808)445-1954, online access for Starnes Aviation LLC section 333 exemption document Process. 

# c ~ /-~~ - ChristopherStarnes MD AME
FILED

December 30, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

DECEMBER 1997 SESSION

MARK LEE TYRE, )

)

APPELLANT, )

) No. 02-C-01-9702-CC-00057

)

) Lake County

v. )

) J. Steven Stafford, Judge

)

) (Habeas Corpus)

BILLY COMPTON, WARDEN, )

)

 APPELLEE. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

Mark Lee Tyre, Pro Se John Knox Walkup

Lake County Reception Correctional Facility Attorney General & Reporter

Route 1, Box 330 500 Charlotte Avenue

Tiptonville, TN 38079 Nashville, TN 37243-0497

Elizabeth T. Ryan

Assistant Attorney General

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

C. Phillip Bivens

District Attorney General

P. O. Drawer E

Dyersburg, TN 38024

OPINION FILED:_______________________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

Joe B. Jones, Presiding Judge
2

O P I N I O N

The appellant, Mark Lee Tyre (petitioner), appeals as of right from a judgment of he

trial court summarily dismissing his action for habeas corpus relief. The trial court held the

petitioner is not entitled to habeas corpus relief because his sentences have not expired,

and the judgments entered in his case are not void upon the face of the judgments. The

petitioner contends he is entitled to maintain an action for habeas corpus to contest the

validity of the indictments based upon this court’s decision in State v. Roger Dale Hill, Sr.,

Wayne County No. 01-C-01-9508-CC-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App., Nashville, June 20, 1996).

He argues the two counts of the indictment in question failed to set forth the requisite mens

rea.

It has long been established that the remedy of habeas corpus is limited in scope

as well as relief. Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2d 157, 161-62 (Tenn. 1993); Passarella v.

State, 891 S.W.2d 619, 626 (Tenn. Crim. App.), per. app. denied (Tenn. 1994). In criminal

cases, the remedy is available if (a) the judgment is void or (b) the sentence has expired.

Passarella, 891 S.W.2d at 626. If the petition fails to establish one of these grounds for

relief, the trial court may dismiss the action without an evidentiary hearing. Passarella, 891

S.W.2d at 827.

In this case, the grounds for relief are cognizable in a post-conviction action, not an

action for habeas corpus. Therefore, the trial court properly summarily dismissed the

action for post-conviction for relief. Given these circumstances, this court is of the opinion

the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court

of Criminal Appeals.

________________________________________

 JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

CONCUR:

______________________________________

 JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

______________________________________

 CURWOOD WITT, JUDGE
Exhibit




Exhibit 4.1










	
														
	FORM OF TRANSFER
	 
	RESTRICTIONS

	FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
(PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER OF TRANSFEREE)
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	-
	 
	 
	 
	-
	 
	 
	 
	 

	

    
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE)
 
   


    Common Shares 
of the Capital Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


    Attorney 
to transfer the said Stock on the Books of the within named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated ______________________________






   Signature: __________________________________________
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER, AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A SCHEDULE 1 CANADIAN CHARTERED BANK OR AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM








Guaranteed 
by:   ___________________________________________________
	 

	 

	

	SECURITY  INSTRUCTIONS - INSTRUCTIONS DE SÉCURITÉ
THIS IS WATERMARKED PAPER, DO NOT ACCEPT WITHOUT 
 NOTING WATERMARK. HOLD TO LIGHT TO VERIFY WATERMARK.
PAPER FILIGRANÉ, NE PAS ACCEPTER SANS VÉRIFIER LA 
 PRÉSENCE DU FILIGRANE. POUR CE FAIRE, PLACER À LA 
 LUMIÈRE.
# Official Journal L 2/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 605 January 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 2

English edition

Legislation

Volume 605 January 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2017/3 of 19 December 2016 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden | 1 |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/4 of 4 January 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2017/3 of 19 December 2016 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden

1

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/4 of 4 January 2017 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 77/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 77 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5016 March 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 77

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5016 March 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | | 2007/143/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007 | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

BUDGETS

European Parliament

2007/143/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | * | | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

BUDGETS

European Parliament

*

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
THE FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         380,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  297,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,979
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               755,918
<PP&E>                                         941,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 445,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,808,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          760,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,521
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,021,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,808,757
<SALES>                                      1,663,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,663,497
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,251,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (620,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (620,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (620,645)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

PHILE ANDRA WATSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDEX EXPRESS,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 3:22-cv-01738-B-BT

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of

United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated June 26, 2023. The Court has made a de

novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendationstowhich

objections were made. The objections are overruled. 

SO ORDERED, this 13

th

 day of July, 2023. 

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Case 3:22-cv-01738-B-BT Document 35 Filed 07/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 937
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.01
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Three Months Ended March 31,                  Six Months Ended March 31,
                                       ------------------------------               -------------------------------

                                        1997                  1996                    1997                    1996
                                       --------               ------                --------                 ------

<S>                                    <C>                   <C>                    <C>                     <C>  
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding during the period          5,953                 5,857                  5,957                   5,856

Common share equivalents                     0                   224                      0                     313
                                       --------               ------                --------                 ------

Total                                    5,953                 6,081                  5,957                   6,169
                                       ========               ======                ========                 ======

Net income (loss)                      ($2,192)               $2,227                ($3,488)                 $4,611
                                       ========               ======                ========                 ======

Net income (loss) per share            ($0.37)                $0.37                 ($0.59)                  $0.75
                                       ========               ======                ========                 ======
</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliancefor COMM 2015-CCRE23 Commercial Mortgage  Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 11997E269

**Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version) - Part Five: Institutions of the Community - Title II: Financial provisions - Article 269 - Article 201 - EC Treaty (Maastricht consolidated version) - Article 201 - EEC Treaty***Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0287 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0070 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Treaty establishing the European Community (Amsterdam consolidated version)

Article 269

Without prejudice to other revenue, the budget shall be financed wholly from own resources.

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall lay down provisions relating to the system of own resources of the Community, which it shall recommend to the Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
#### Booker T. GARDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22939.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1944.

W. E. Pinkston, of Dallas, for appellant. Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

■ Appellant’s motion to withdraw his appeal is granted, and the clerk will issue mandate forthwith.
Order filed January 10, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00983-CR

____________

AJA CRAWFORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-CCR-183616

ORDER

The record was due on December 27, 2018. Robin Rosen, the court reporter 

for County Court at Law No. 3 of Fort Bend County, has notified this court that 

appellant has not paid or arranged to pay for it and is not appealing as indigent. 

However, the trial court appointed counsel for appellant, implying the trial court has 

found appellant indigent and entitled to a free record on appeal. Accordingly, Rosen 

shall file the reporter’s record by February 11, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b)(3).

PER CURIAM
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 228

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13, 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

JOINT RESOLUTION

To approve the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

with respect to the products of Romania.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress approves the extension of nondiscrim4 inatory treatment with respect to the products of Romania

5 transmitted by the President to the Congress on July 2,

6 1993.

Passed the House of Representatives October 12,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
# C_2016200EN.01003101.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/31

---

Action brought on 18 April 2016 — Piper Verlag v EUIPO (THE TRAVEL EPISODES)

(Case T-164/16)

(2016/C 200/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Piper Verlag GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: F. Oster, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark including the word elements ‘THE TRAVEL EPISODES’ — Application No 13 687 371

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2016 in Case R 1099/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision in such a way that registration of the word/figurative mark ‘THE TRAVEL EPISODES’ as an EU trade mark at the European Union Intellectual Property Office is ordered. |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision in such a way that registration of the word/figurative mark ‘THE TRAVEL EPISODES’ as an EU trade mark at the European Union Intellectual Property Office is ordered.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SHERLINE JEAN-LOUIS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

vs. § Case No. 3:22-cv-01037-C

§

AMERIFINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, §

LLC, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion of Defendant, AmeriFinancial Solutions, LLC, 

for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. Having considered the Unopposed Motion, the Court 

finds that the Unopposed Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. Defendant, AmeriFinancial

Solutions, LLC, is exempted from the Northern District of Texas’s Local Counsel Requirement. 

L.R. 83.10(a).

SO ORDERED on this ___ day of July, 2022.

__________________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01037-L Document 12-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 43