alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.18





TN-K Energy Group Inc.


649 Sparta Highway, Suite 102


Crossville, TN  38555




As of June 29, 2010





Mr. Dan Page


Post Office Box 574


Crossville, TN  38557





Re:
TN-K Energy Group Inc., formerly known as Digital Lifestyles Group, Inc. (the “Company”)

Fourth Amendment to Convertible Line of Credit Note Agreement




Dear Mr. Page:





Reference is hereby made to that certain Convertible Line of Credit Note Agreement dated as of April 23, 2007 by and between the Company and you, as amended by the First Amendment dated September 27, 2008 and as further amended by the Second Amendment dated May 1, 2009 and the Third Amendment dated December 8, 2009 (collectively, the “Note”).





You hereby agree to amend the Note to extend the due date of the Note to December 31, 2010.





All other terms and conditions as set forth in the Note shall remain the same.




This Fourth Amendment may not be amended or waived except by an instrument in writing signed by the Company and you.  This Fourth Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement.  Delivery of an executed signature page of this Fourth Amendment by facsimile transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof or thereof, as the case may be. This Fourth Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Tennessee.  This Fourth Amendment sets forth the entire agreement between the parties hereto as to the matters set forth herein and supersede all prior communications, written or oral, with respect to the matters herein.





TN-K Energy Group Inc.


By: /s/ Ken Page


Ken Page, Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing terms are agreed to as of


the day and date above.




/s/ Dan Page


Dan Page
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INDERJIT SINGH JHATTU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71891

Agency No. A097-587-473

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Inderjit Singh Jhattu, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

APR 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71891

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s findings of fact, including credibility findings. Tekle v. Mukasey, 533

F.3d 1044, 1051 (9th Cir. 2008). We grant the petition for review, and we remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s adverse credibility finding

because the perceived omissions at the hearing, including Jhattu’s failure to

mention certain details regarding the man whose death precipitated the rally, and

that Hindus celebrated the killing and attacked the rally, are minor and do not go to

the heart of his claims. See Chen v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 611, 617 (9th Cir. 2004)

(“Minor discrepancies, inconsistencies or omissions that do not go to the heart of

an applicant’s claim do not constitute substantial evidence to support an adverse

credibility finding.”) (citation omitted). The record reflects no inconsistency

between Jhattu’s testimony and his application, and Jhattu was never asked about

the man in question or the Hindus and their response. See Mousa v. Mukasey, 530

F.3d 1025, 1029 (9th Cir. 2008) (failure to explain consequences of leg infection

did not support adverse credibility finding where petitioner testified about infection

“only in passing” and was not asked to discuss the seriousness of the infection or

how she recovered); Singh v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 1164, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004) (fact

that petitioner “did not initially volunteer” information about seeing other Akali

Dal members at temple was insufficient to support adverse credibility finding). 
3 08-71891

Accordingly, we remand for the BIA to assess Jhattu’s asylum, withholding of

removal, and CAT claims on the merits, deeming his testimony credible. See INS

v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam); Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555

F.3d 1089, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
# 7.2.1

# 7.2.2

# 7.2.3

# 7.2.4

# 7.2.5

# 7.3.1

# 7.3.2

# 7.3.3

# 7.4.1

# 7.4.2

# 7.4.3

# 7.4.4

# 7.4.5

# 7.4.6
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 211 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 211

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                       relating to school prayer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 1993

    Mr. Murtha introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                       relating to school prayer.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to prohibit 
individual prayer in public schools or to prohibit public school 
officials from including voluntary prayer in official school ceremonies 
and meetings. Neither the United States nor any State shall prescribe 
the content of any such prayer.''.

                                 <all>
```
Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-321-K (01)

§

ISRAEL RAMOS SERNA §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry 

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation 

Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections 

thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it 

is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and 

Plea Agreement and the Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed 

in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Signed November 23rd, 2022.

_____________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00321-K Document 30 Filed 11/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60
Agenda -- November 2008 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings October 30, 2008 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 p.m. Wednesday, 

October 29 to Debt.Management@do.treas.gov and Scott.Sherman@ny.frb.org. Even if you are 

not scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

Low/High 

October-December / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

January-March / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

II. Budget Deficit Estimates 

FY 2009 / 

FY 2010 / 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

10-year note / 

30-year bond / 

10-year note reopening / 

2-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / 

5-year note (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

10-year TIPS / / / / - / / 

20-year TIPS / 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates

52-week bill sizes (Nov/Dec/Jan) / / / / - / / 

Total Change in T-Bills Outstanding Oct – Dec / 

Total Change in T-Bills Outstanding Jan – Mar / 

Total Change in T-Bills Outstanding FY 2009 / 

Operational CMB(s) to be issued (size(s), date(s)) / / / / 

SFP CMB(s) to be issued (size(s), date(s)) / / / /

Please provide your estimates in the format provided above with central estimates followed by low/high estimates for each issue. 

Discussion Topics 

1. Given Treasury's financing needs, as well as current and medium-term trends in the fiscal 

outlook, what adjustments should Treasury make to the auction calendar in terms of issuance 

sizes and maturities? Please include potential security selection, introduction dates, frequencies, 

and auction sizes. 
2. Given the broad benefits of a highly liquid Treasury market, what steps can be taken by the 

private sector to ensure efficient market functioning and to prevent episodes of chronic fails? For 

example, could amendments to the master repurchase agreement and the establishment of a 

standard cash trading agreement provide greater economic incentives that would help to clear 

fails before they became chronic (e.g. margining of fails, negative repo trading, bilateral cash 

settlement of aged fails, etc.) Are there other actions that could be taken that would facilitate a 

reduction in chronic fails, such as establishing a multi-lateral netting facility? Are there any other 

approaches that the private sector or Treasury should consider? 

3. The Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC have undertaken a series of steps to strengthen 

public confidence in financial institutions and to foster the robust functioning of credit markets. 

Please discuss how these actions have impacted credit markets, if additional steps should be 

taken, and the implications of any current or additional steps on the Treasury market.
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 24 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 24 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 20 December 2004         

providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Secale cereale, not satisfying the requirements of Council Directive 66/402/EEC

(notified under document number C(2004) 5027)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/893/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (1), and in particular Article 17 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The marketing in the Community of seed of winter rye which does not satisfy the requirements laid down in Directive 66/402/EEC in respect of the presence of the harmful organism Claviceps purpurea shall be permitted, for a period expiring on 30 November 2004, in accordance with the terms set out in the Annex to this Decision and subject to the following conditions:

Article 2

Any seed supplier wishing to place on the market the seeds referred to in Article 1 shall apply to the Member State in which he is established.

The Member State concerned shall authorise the supplier to place that seed on the market, unless:

Article 3

The Member States shall assist each other administratively in the application of this Decision.

Latvia shall act as coordinating Member State in order to ensure that the total amount authorised does not exceed the maximum quantity specified in the Annex.

Any Member State receiving an application under Article 2 shall immediately notify the coordinating Member State of the amount covered by the application. The coordinating Member State shall immediately inform the notifying Member State as to whether authorisation would result in the maximum quantity being exceeded.

Article 4

Member States shall immediately notify the Commission and the other Member States of the quantities in respect of which they have granted marketing authorisation pursuant to this Decision.

Article 5

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2004.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2309/66. Directive as last amended by Directive 2003/61/EC (OJ L 165, 3.7.2003, p. 23).

(2)OJ L 8, 14.1.2003, p. 10. Decision as last amended by Decision 2003/403/EC (OJ L 141, 7.6.2003, p. 23).

----

ANNEX

----
# Official Journal C 253/13 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4713 October 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4713 October 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 253/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 253/2 | State aid — Italy — State aid C 18/04 (ex NN 129/03) — Compensation following natural disasters and other occurrences — Invitation to submit comments, pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty and Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 253/3 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA) originating in the United States of America | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 253/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 253/2

State aid — Italy — State aid C 18/04 (ex NN 129/03) — Compensation following natural disasters and other occurrences — Invitation to submit comments, pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty and Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (1)

2

2004/C 253/3

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA) originating in the United States of America

6

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 253/4 | Notice of invitation to tender for refunds on barley exported to certain third countries | 8 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 253/4

Notice of invitation to tender for refunds on barley exported to certain third countries

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 168/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 168 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6115 May 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 168

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6115 May 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| 2018/C 168/01 | Calls for applications for the WiFi4EU initiative (promotion of internet connectivity in local communities), under the Connecting Europe Facility in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks (Amended 2017 CEF Telecom Work Programme — Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 7732) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

2018/C 168/01

Calls for applications for the WiFi4EU initiative (promotion of internet connectivity in local communities), under the Connecting Europe Facility in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks (Amended 2017 CEF Telecom Work Programme — Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 7732)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### In the Matter of Tanya M., a Person Alleged to be in Need of Supervision.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly ascertained through allocution that respondent admitted to the acts alleged in the petition, that she voluntarily waived her right to *952a fact-finding hearing, and that she was aware of the possible dispositional orders *(see,*Family Ct Act § 321.3 [1]). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, O’Donnell, J.— PINS.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 311

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the percentage of United States

Armed Forces participating in the United Nations-led peacekeeping force

in Haiti should not exceed the annual percentage assessed the United

States by the United Nations for contributions to finance the peacekeeping activities of the United Nations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1994

Mr. FARR of California (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, and Mr.

MICA) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the percentage

of United States Armed Forces participating in the

United Nations-led peacekeeping force in Haiti should

not exceed the annual percentage assessed the United

States by the United Nations for contributions to finance

the peacekeeping activities of the United Nations.

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 940

(July 31, 1994) authorized the formation of a multinational force for the purpose of facilitating the return

to Haiti of the democratically elected President Jean

Bertrand Aristide;
2

•HCON 311 IH

Whereas approximately 20,000 United States troops have

been deployed to Haiti as a part of the multinational

force for the purpose of establishing a secure and stable

environment for the return to Haiti of President Aristide;

Whereas the efforts of the international community in the

Western Hemisphere and throughout the world are vital

to enabling a democratic transition to occur and be sustained in Haiti;

Whereas the success of this democratic transition fundamentally relies on the establishment of independent democratic institutions in Haiti which in turn will improve the

economic and political stability in Haiti;

Whereas the United States is contributing a significant

amount of resources to support the United States-led

multinational force in Haiti;

Whereas a United Nations-led peacekeeping force in Haiti

will be deployed upon completion of the mission of the

United States-led multinational force in Haiti; and

Whereas the United States is charged a peacekeeping assessment by the United Nations annually for the purpose of

financing the peacekeeping activities of the United Nations in troubled regions of the world: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 percentage of United States Armed Forces participating

4 in the United Nations-led peacekeeping force in Haiti

5 (known as the ‘‘United Nations Mission in Haiti’’ or

6 ‘‘UNMIH’’) to be deployed upon completion of the mission
3

•HCON 311 IH

1 of the United States-led multinational force in Haiti

2 should be no higher than the percentage assessed the

3 United States by the United Nations for contributions to

4 finance the peacekeeping activities of the United Nations

5 for the year in which UNMIH becomes operational.

Æ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105
 

NOV 17 2011 

Mr. Chas Spell 

Arizona Public Service Company 

Mail Station 9303 

P. O. Box 53999 

Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3933 

Dear Mr. Spell: 

I am writing to inform you that EPA Region 9 is developing a partial Regional Haze Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) for the state of Arizona. However, our preliminary determination is that the 

West Phoenix Power Station is exempt from Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements. 

Therefore, we do not expect that the facility will be subject to any additional emission controls based on 

those requirements. 

The purpose of the Regional Haze FIP is to improve visibility in national parks and wilderness areas in 

Arizona and surrounding states as required by Section 169A of the Clean Air Act (Act). EPA has entered 

into a consent decree that requires the Agency to propose approval of Arizona's Regional Haze State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) and/or propose a Regional Haze FIP that meets the requirements of the Act 

and EPA's regional haze regulations by May 15,2012. The consent decree also requires the Agency to 

take final action on the Arizona Regional Haze SIP and/or FIP by November 15,2012. EPA Region 9 

will hold public hearings in Arizona and solicit public comments on a proposed Arizona Regional Haze 

FIP in the months preceding the November 15 deadline. 

During the process of developing the Arizona Regional Haze SIP, submitted to EPA on March 2, 2011, 

the Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ADEQ) determined that the West Phoenix Power 

Station was exempt from BART requirements under section 169A(b)(2)(A) of the Act, and EPA's 

implementing regulations and BART guidelines at 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart P and Appendix Y. ADEQ's 

analysis appears to be sound and we therefore intend to concur with their determination that this facility 

is exempt from BART requirements. 

Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Thomas Webb at 

webb.thomas@epa.gov, or by phone at 415-947-4139. 

SincereI 

Y

I1·J,ktr ~MCKaUghan Associate Director, Air Division 

cc:	 Henry R. Darwin, ADEQ 

Eric Massey, ADEQ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as theChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 4,  2008 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham    |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                       |   | Steven C. Oldham,       |
|                       |   | President and           |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit tothe Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----