alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**MEMORANDUM**

**SUBJECT** : Temporary Boilers in the CAA 112(c)(6) Listing Notice and Emissions Inventory and 112(c)(3) Inventory **DATE** : December 14, 2012 **FROM** : Nathan E. Topham, Environmental Engineer

Metals and Inorganic Chemicals Group, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD **TO** : Docket ID: EPA

– HQ

– OAR

– 2006

– 0790

______________________________________________________________________________ Temporary

boilers are not a listed source category in the 112(c)(6) inventory . They are not listed in Table 1, Table 2, or Table 3 in the 1998 112(c)(6) listing notice. Temporary boilers are not discussed in that notice as a source category already subject to regulation or being considered for regulation. See 63 FR 17838. The source categories of industrial boilers and commercial/institutional bo ilers in the 112(c)(6) listing are consistent with the source categories regulated through the Subpart DDDDD and JJJJJJ NESHAPs. We do not have data for emissions of 112(c)(6) pollutants from temporary boilers in 1990, the y ear on which the 112(c)(6) inve ntory is based. Estimating emissions from temporary boilers would have been impractical when the inventory was developed for the 1998 listing notice and is impossible to do at this stage
. Despite the practical obstacles in estimating their emissions, these boilers are only used for short periods in limited circumstances. 1 Therefore, we expect the emissions from such boilers would be negligible when compared to the emissions of industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers that are part of the listed source category and 112(c)(6) inventory
. The same circumstances apply to the inventory

developed to fulfill the requirements of CAA 112(c)(3) and 112(k)(3)(B). T he list of area source categories used for 112(c)(3) does not include temporary

boilers as a cat egory

listed for regulation or contemplated for future regulation. See 64 FR 38706, 66 FR 8220, 67 FR 43112, and 67 FR 70427. The same problems associated with estimating emissions from these sources for 112(c)(6) exists for the purposes of 112(c)(3). In f

act, the problem is compounded as there are 30 pollutants regulated under 112(c)(3), compared with seven pollutants for 112(c)(6). Emissions of the 30 112(c)(3) HAP, if present, would be inconsequential when compared to the emissions from industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers that are a part of the listed source category and 112(c)(3) inventory
.

1 These boilers operat e in place of another non
- tem porary boiler while that boiler is being constructed, replaced or repaired
. In such cases, the non
- tem porary boiler wo uld be the boiler being regulated and would be accounted for as significant in our emission estimates for meeting CAA 112(c)(6) and CAA 112(c)(3).
Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 8 PageID 16Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 8 PageID 17Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 3 of 8 PageID 18Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 4 of 8 PageID 19Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 5 of 8 PageID 20Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 6 of 8 PageID 21Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 7 of 8 PageID 22Case 3:22-cv-01724-L Document 1-4 Filed 08/09/22 Page 8 of 8 PageID 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,983
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,850
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,005
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,504
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,417
<LOANS>                                        128,713
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,197
<DEPOSITS>                                     122,342
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,708
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 153,197
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,573
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  171
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   516
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,260
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,644
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,999
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,261
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      423
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    871
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         871
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       511
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.99
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,351
<LOANS-PAST>                                       179
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    234
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   925
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,353
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,353
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALEXANDER KOSNICKI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-30070

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00144-RAJ-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2014** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Alexander Kosnicki appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

withdraw his guilty plea. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm. 

FILED

MAY 23 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Kosnicki

failed to demonstrate a “fair and just reason” for withdrawal of his guilty plea. See

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(d)(2)(B); United States v. Mayweather, 634 F.3d 498, 504 (9th

Cir. 2010). Kosnicki knew of the alleged threats by the confidential informant

before his guilty plea, even if he did not know of the recordings, and he does not

explain how development of such threats could have made any particular defense

plausible. He also does not explain whether he informed counsel of the threats

before his plea. Further, the existence of recordings was disclosed in discovery,

and the recordings did not provide evidence that the confidential informant made

threats.

We decline to review Kosnicki’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim on

direct appeal. This is not one of the “unusual cases where (1) the record on appeal

is sufficiently developed to permit determination of the issue, or (2) the legal

representation is so inadequate that it obviously denies a defendant his Sixth

Amendment right to counsel.” See United States v. Rahman, 642 F.3d 1257,

1259–60 (9th Cir. 2011). We therefore leave open the possibility that Kosnicki

might raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in collateral proceedings. 

See id. at 1260.
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29625]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2483; MM Docket No. 99-282; RM-9710]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Littlefield, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a Petition for Reconsideration filed 
on behalf of Mountain West Broadcasting directed to the Report and 
Order in this proceeding, which denied the requested allotment of 
Channel 265C to Littlefield, Arizona, for failure to demonstrate that 
Littlefield qualifies as a community for allotment purposes. See 65 FR 
25463, May 2, 2000. The petition for reconsideration is dismissed as it 
does not meet the limited provisions set forth in the Commission's 
Rules under which a rule making action will be reconsidered. With this 
action, this docketed proceeding is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, in MM Docket No. 99-282, adopted October 
25, 2000, and released November 3, 2000. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-
A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of 
this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-29625 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-340-X

§

RICKA SMITH (4) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of 

Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of 

the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of 

service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is 

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and RICKA SMITH (4) is 

hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (18 U.S.C. § 659) – Conspiracy to Commit Theft from Interstate 

Shipement. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☐ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

 The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who 

set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under 

§ 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination 

of whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) 

why the defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by 

clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the 

United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 7th day of March, 2024.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00340-X Document 123 Filed 03/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 341
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 21 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 2 of 21 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 3 of 21 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 4 of 21 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 5 of 21 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 6 of 21 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 7 of 21 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 8 of 21 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 9 of 21 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 10 of 21 PageID 10
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 11 of 21 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 12 of 21 PageID 12
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 13 of 21 PageID 13
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 14 of 21 PageID 14
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 15 of 21 PageID 15
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 16 of 21 PageID 16
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 17 of 21 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 18 of 21 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 19 of 21 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 20 of 21 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cv-00829-O Document 1 Filed 09/15/22 Page 21 of 21 PageID 21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DANIEL P. KELLY, JR., 

 Plaintiff,

v.

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC,

 Defendants.

Case No. 3:22-cv-01412-N

AGREED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Plaintiff, DANIEL P. 

KELLY, JR., and the Defendants, PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC, through their respective

counsel that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, against PENNYMAC LOAN 

SERVICES, LLC, pursuant to settlement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Each party shall 

bear its own costs and attorney fees. 

Dated: December 27, 2022 Respectfully Submitted,

DANIEL P. KELLY, JR PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC,

/s/ Nathan C. Volheim /s/ Elizabeth K. Duffy

Nathan C. Volheim (#6302103) Elizabeth K. Duffy (24050535)

Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for Defendant

Sulaiman Law Group, LTD Locke Lord LLP

2500 S. Highland Avenue, Suite 200 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800

Lombard, Illinois 60148 Dallas, Texas 75201-6776

Phone: (630) 575-8181 Phone: (214) 740-8000

Fax: (630) 575-8188 Facsimile: (214) 740-8800

nvolheim@sulaimanlaw.com eduffy@lockelord.com

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 16 Filed 12/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 46
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I today caused a copy of the foregoing document to be electronically 

filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will be sent to all attorneys of 

record.

/s/ Nathan C. Volheim

Nathan C. Volheim 

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 16 Filed 12/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 47
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 22 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 36
#### TUEL v. STATE.

No. 21735.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1941.

McIntosh & Duncan, of Gilmer, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and the waiver of a trial by jury, the court assessed his penalty at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for thirty days.

The transcript in the case fails to show any notice of appeal. This is essential to confer jurisdiction on this court. See Art. 827, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and authorities collated under said article.

The appeal is dismissed.
The Financial Stability Oversight Council unanimously approved the attached resolution by 

notational vote on July 22, 2011.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT

REQUIRED BY SECTION 112 OF THE DODD-FRANK WALL STREET

REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

WHEREAS, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (the “Council”) under the provisions of 

section 112 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “DFA”) is 

required to annually report to and testify before Congress on: the activities of the Council; 

significant financial market and regulatory developments, including insurance and accounting 

regulations and standards, along with an assessment of those developments on the stability of the 

financial system; potential emerging threats to the financial stability of the United States; all 

determinations made under section 113 or title VIII of the DFA, and the basis for such 

determinations; all recommendations made under section 119 of the DFA and the result of such 

recommendations; and recommendations to enhance the integrity, efficiency, competitiveness, 

and stability of United States financial markets; to promote market discipline; and to maintain 

investor confidence. 

WHEREAS, staff from the Council Agencies prepared the attached report pursuant to section 

112 of the DFA and members of the Council have reviewed and commented on the attached 

report.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council approves the attached report 

prepared under the provisions of section 112 of the DFA and authorizes the Chairperson, or his 

designee, to take such action as necessary to formally transmit the attached report to the 
Congress and to otherwise make it available to the public as the Chairperson deems appropriate; 

and,

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council hereby delegates authority to the Chairperson, 

or his designee, to make technical, nonsubstantive, or conforming changes to the text of the 

attached report and to take such other actions as they deem necessary or appropriate to prepare 

the report for release to the Congress and the public.
Exhibit 10.2


 


 





RESOLUTION OF
THE SHAREHOLDERS


 


OF


 


PARADIGM RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION


 


 


The following
is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice
to this meeting having been waived, held on September 11th, 2015


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to the Resignation of our Director Takanori Ozaki, there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion
to effectuate a elect a new DIRECTOR to the Board of the Company;


 


NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice
a preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that:


 


Mr. DANIEL OTAZO has been nominated, and has accepted
the position of DIRECTOR


and CFO and Interim CEO of the Company.


 


Said Motion
is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.


 


Dated: September 11th, 2015


 


/s/ Nacima Guechi                              


Nacima
Guechi, on behalf of the Majority Holders
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
Janice B. Trouba, Chief Financial Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)       
          The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008,
          which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
          The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
          quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp,
          Inc.



|Date: May 9, 2008 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By /s/ Janice B. Trouba      
      Janice B. TroubaIts:  Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,861
<PP&E>                                           2,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,703
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   187,129
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,293
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (213)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>