alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 16-3921

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Dewuan C. Williams lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: June 12, 2017 Filed: June 15, 2017 [Unpublished]

____________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Dewuan C. Williams directly appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to a felon-in-possession offense. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she argues that Williams’s sentence is unreasonable and requests leave to withdraw.Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court 1 did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (explaining that sentences are reviewed under de ferential abuse-ofdiscretion standard and disc ussing substantive reasonableness). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm Williams’s sentence.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”) that:

 

(1)                                  the 10-Q Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained inthe 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 8, 2005 | /s/  Lawrence A. Kenyon  |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                     | Lawrence  A. Kenyon,     |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

______________________

* This certificationshall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section,nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing underthe Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

 

----
# Official Journal C 206/14 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 206 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4714 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 206

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4714 August 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 206/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 206/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3539 — GOLDMAN SACHS/QMH) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 206/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3448 — EDP/HIDROCANTÁBRICO) (1) | 3 |
| 2004/C 206/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3516 — REPSOL YPF/SHELL PORTUGAL) (1) | 4 |
| 2004/C 206/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3355 — APOLLO/JP MORGAN/PRIMACOM) (1) | 5 |
| 2004/C 206/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3508 — DOUGHTY HANSON/BALTA) (1) | 5 |
| 2004/C 206/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3497 — PFIZER/CAMPTO) (1) | 6 |
| 2004/C 206/8 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3472 — RELIANCE/TREVIRA) (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 206/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 206/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3539 — GOLDMAN SACHS/QMH) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2004/C 206/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3448 — EDP/HIDROCANTÁBRICO) (1)

3

2004/C 206/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3516 — REPSOL YPF/SHELL PORTUGAL) (1)

4

2004/C 206/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3355 — APOLLO/JP MORGAN/PRIMACOM) (1)

5

2004/C 206/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3508 — DOUGHTY HANSON/BALTA) (1)

5

2004/C 206/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3497 — PFIZER/CAMPTO) (1)

6

2004/C 206/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3472 — RELIANCE/TREVIRA) (1)

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# QSBL 123112

Page &P of &N

# Business Lending 123112

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 093012

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 063012

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 033112

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 123111

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 093011

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 063011

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 033111

Page &P of &N

# image1.png
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Delaware Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Delaware Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | NA     | 1      | NA     | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-062-01-H

TYLER PATRICK BROWN,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AI{D RECOMMENDATION

OF TTIE I,JNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,]ILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilry of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections theleto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OXl), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order'

SO ORDERED

Dated OctoberL, 2022.

JAME WESL YHENDRIX

D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00062-H-BQ Document 37 Filed 10/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 89
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L OU I S D. C OS C O, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. DE B I D. L I GH T S E Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 17162 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 5 - c v - 0 0 0 7 8 - J C MR AM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da J a m e s C . M a ha n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B e f o r e : B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , a n dC A L L A H A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . L oui s D . C os c o, f

orm e r l yaN e va das t at e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng vi ol a t i on o f h is r ig h t o f

a c c e s s to th e c o u rts a r is in g f r o m ap r is o n lib r a r ian ’s f a ilu r e to phot oc opyal e ga l doc um e nti n at i m e l ym a nne r . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 

# FI LED JAN 24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17162 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , F TCv . S te fa n c h ik , 55 9 F . 3d 92 4, 92 7 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) , a n dw e a f

f irm . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y g ran t edsu m m ary j u d g m en tt o L i g h t sey b ecau se th e r ig h t o f

a c c e s s to th e c o u rts is lim ite dto c a s e s in w h ic h in m ate s “a tta c kth e ir s e n te n c e s , d ir e c tlyo rc o lla te r a lly , a n d. . . c h a lle n g e th e c o n d itio n s o f th e ir co n fi n em en t . Im p ai rm en to f an y otherl i t i ga t i ng c apa c i tyi s s i m pl yone of the i nc i de nt a l ( a nd pe r f

e c t l yc ons t i tut i ona l ) c ons e que nc e s of c onvi c t i on a nd i ncar ce rat i on . ” L ew is v . Casey , 518 U . S . 343, 355 ( 1996) . C os c o’ s unde r l y i ng litig a tio n w a s n o t ac h a lle n g e to h is c o n v ic tio n o rto h is c o n d itio n s o f c o n f in e m e n t. R a the r , i tw a s ba s e d on ade c l a r a t oryj udgm e nta c t i on r e l a t e d t o as e tt l e m e nt a gr e e m e nthe ha d e nt e r e d i nt o w i th W y om i ng pr i s on of f i c i a l s , r e ga r di ng com pensat i on for property thatw as confi sc at ed fr om hi s pri son cel l . T here fore , C os c o ha d no c ons t i tut i ona l r i ghtof a c c e s s t o the c ourt s t o l i t i ga t e the unde r l y i ng a c tio n . Se e S im m o n s v . Sa c ra m e n to Cn ty . Su p e r . C t. , 3 1 8 F .3 d1 1 5 6 , 1 1 5 9 - 6 0 ( 9 th C i r . 2003) ( e xpl a i ni ng tha t“ apr i s one rha s no c ons t i tut i ona l r i ghtof a c c e s s t o the court s t o l i t i gat e an u nrel at ed ci vi l cl ai m ”) . C o s c o ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.
Case 2:22-cr-00074-Z-BR Document 22 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47
#### Odell HOLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23000.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1944.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant’s motion to withdraw his appeal is granted, and the clerk is directed to so certify.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Taitron Components
Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1 ) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 14, 2008


/s/ Stewart WangStewart
      WangChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/ David VanderhorstDavid
      VanderhorstChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 25995.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Upon a plea of guilty before the court appellant was assessed a fine of $200 for selling whiskey in a dry area, from which judgment he appeals.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are-found in the record, and the proceedings are found to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 111

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating October 21, 1993, as ‘‘National

Biomedical Research Day’’.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 111

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating October 21, 1993, as ‘‘National Biomedical

Research Day’’.

Whereas the biomedical research community in the United

States is recognized as the world leader in discovering

knowledge that promotes the health and well-being of

people throughout the world;

Whereas biomedical research offers the best hope for breakthroughs in the detection and treatment of diseases in

the future;
2

•HJ 111 EH

Whereas since 1900 biomedical research has helped increase

the lifespan of people in the United States by 25 years

through the development of vaccines, antibiotics, and

anti-infective drugs;

Whereas biomedical research has contributed to the virtual

elimination of epidemic diseases such as cholera, smallpox, yellow fever, and bubonic plague, and in the United

States biomedical research has helped to prevent such

childhood killers such as polio, diptheria, tetanus, pertussis, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome;

Whereas biomedical researchers are working diligently toward

cures for diseases such as Acquired Immune Deficiency

Syndrome (AIDS), Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, arthritis,

diabetes, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, heart and lung diseases, mental illness, and countless other diseases that

afflict millions of people in the United States;

Whereas the Congress has consistently demonstrated a financial commitment to maintaining the preeminence of the

United States in biomedical research through support of

such agencies as the National Institutes of Health, the

Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration,

the Centers for Disease Control, and the Veterans’ Administration;

Whereas the products and byproducts of biomedical research

contribute to the health of the United States economy by

reducing medical costs through prevention of various diseases and by furthering the success of the United States

in international commerce and trade;

Whereas biomedical research has led to drugs and vaccines

that safeguard the animals we raise and the food we
3

•HJ 111 EH

consume, protecting the health of such animals as cattle,

hogs, sheep, and chickens; and

Whereas biomedical research also has contributed to the

health and well-being of animals through vaccines for

parvovirus, infectious canine hepatitis, rabies, distemper,

anthrax, tetanus, and feline leukemia, and has helped the

prospects of endangered species by reducing disease and

promoting reproduction: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That October 21, 1993, is designated as ‘‘National Bio4 medical Research Day’’, and the President is authorized

5 and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the

6 people of the United States to observe such day with ap7 propriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Official Journal L 48/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 48 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5924 February 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 48

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5924 February 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | * | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/150 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2016 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

*

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/150 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2016

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 21(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Budgetary remarks are only executable insofar as they do not modify or extend the scope of an existing legal base, impinge on the administrative autonomy of institutions and can be covered by available resources (as indicated in the annex to the executability letter dated 28 October 2015).

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice; Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

We published a notice on October 24, 2000 (65 FR 63606) with a date for the receipt of comments on or after December 26, 2000. The corrected date should be on or before December 26, 2000. 

# DATES:

We will accept comments on this notice on or before December 26, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

The public must make comments and suggestions directly to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503; and Rebecca Mullin, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information Collection Officer, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 222, Arlington, VA 22203. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Farrell, (703) 358-2156, Division of Federal Aid, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

                    On October 24, 2000, we published a notice requesting comments on Information Collection for approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act for the Boating Infrastructure Grant Survey Program. The                     **DATES**                     caption stated that comments should be submitted on or after December 26, 2000. The correct date for accepting comments from the public is on or before December 26, 2000.                 

                    Accordingly, in FR Doc. 00-27109 published at 65 FR 63606 on October 24, 2000, on page 63607, in column 1, correct the                     **DATES**                    caption to read as follows:                 

**DATES:**                     Interested parties must submit comments on or before December 26, 2000.                 

Dated: November 9, 2000.

Rebecca A. Mullin,

Information Collection Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service.

[FR Doc. 00-29308 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTzuCT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

TINITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-046-01-H

DIEGOARMANDO CHACONCHAVEZ,

Defendant.

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

0 636(bXI), the undersigrred District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magisuate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

/1

Dated Septembe, {,2022.

JAMES SLEYHENDRIX

UNI D STATES DISTzuCT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE I'NITED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

/Lo/r?

Case 1:22-cr-00046-H-BU Document 30 Filed 09/07/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48