alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Linda Rauer, Appellant, v Gordon Rauer, Respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.), dated February 16, 1988, as, after a nonjury trial, made distributive and maintenance awards and denied her counsel and expert fees.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by (1) deleting from the sixteenth decretal paragraph thereof the words "two (2)” and by substituting therefor the words "five (5)” and (2) deleting from the second decretal paragraph thereof (a) in the sentence beginning with the words "The plaintiffs award”, the word "either” and the words "or at the time of the sale of the property”, and (b) the sentences beginning with the words "In no event”, and, "In the event”; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The record indicates that the plaintiff wife is a New York State certified teacher who has not taught in over 24 years. In view of this fact, as well as her age and her troubled state of health, it is unrealistic to expect that she will return to classroom teaching. Moreover, the plaintiff’s lifetime earning capacity has been reduced due to the fact that during this long marriage, she remained home for much of the time to be a parent and homemaker. Under these circumstances, the duration of the defendant husband’s obligation to pay maintenance should be increased from a period of two years to a period of five years *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]; *Behan v Behan,*163 AD2d 505; *Formato v Formato,*134 AD2d 564).

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff a distributive award in "an amount equal to one-half of the value of the defendant’s interest in the property” known as 34-36 Main Street, Haverstraw, New York, which was to be paid "forthwith” from the defendant’s share of an escrow account. However, the Supreme Court erred in allowing the defendant the option of delaying payment of this award *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [b]; [5] [e]). Accordingly, the judgment has been modified to the extent indicated.

*550We have examined the plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on November 3, 2000, a proposed Consent 
Decree in United States v. The Detroit Edison Company, et al., Civil 
Action No. 00-74844, was lodged with the United States District Court 
for the Eastern District of Michigan. This Consent Decree represents a 
settlement of claims brought against the Detroit Edison Company, Ford 
Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation (``Settling Defendants'') 
in the above-referenced action under Section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Recovery Act (``CERCLA''), 42 
U.S.C. 9607, to recover costs incurred by the United States in 
connection with the J.E. Berger Superfund Site in Detroit, Michigan.
    The Department of Justice will receive a period of thirty (30) days 
from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environmental and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. The Detroit Edison Company, et al. (E.D. Mich.), D.J. 
Ref. 90-11-3-06946.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, 211 West Fort Street, Suite 2001, Detroit, Michigan 
48226-3211, and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611. In requesting a 
copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $5.50 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bruce S. Gelber,
Chief Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-29541 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Order entered October 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00845-CR

FELTNER DEAN HUNT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-75195-R

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 3, 2019 second motion to extend the time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before 

November 7, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by November 7, 2019, this appeal may be 

abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# Official Journal C 252/12 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 252 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4812 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 252

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4812 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 252/1 | Council Decision of 24 September 2004 — Renewal of the membership of the European Social Fund Committee | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 252/2 | Euro exchange rates | 9 |
| 2005/C 252/3 | State aid — Italy — State aid No C 61/2003 (ex NN 42/2001) — Legge Aeronautica n. 808/85 — Widening of proceedings — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Artcle 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 10 |
| 2005/C 252/4 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 21 |
| 2005/C 252/5 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 27 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 252/1

Council Decision of 24 September 2004 — Renewal of the membership of the European Social Fund Committee

1

Commission

2005/C 252/2

Euro exchange rates

9

2005/C 252/3

State aid — Italy — State aid No C 61/2003 (ex NN 42/2001) — Legge Aeronautica n. 808/85 — Widening of proceedings — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Artcle 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

Legge Aeronautica n. 808/85

10

2005/C 252/4

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

21

2005/C 252/5

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

27

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 252/6 | Call for proposals — Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy | 28 |

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 252/6

Call for proposals — Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy

28

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C29, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C29

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
TIGTA 4.1 Table Page 1 of 1 2/4/2015

TIGTA 4.1 Table

(values in $millions)

Label

PY Agency 

DME

PY 

External 

Contributi

ons DME

PY Agency 

O&M

PY 

External 

Contributi

ons O&M PY Total

CY Agency 

DME

CY 

External 

Contributi

ons DME

CY Agency 

O&M

CY 

External 

Contributi

ons O&M CY Total

BY Agency 

DME

BY 

External 

Contributi

ons DME

BY Agency 

O&M

BY 

External 

Contributi

ons O&M BY Total

% Change 

from CY 

to BY 

Request

Capital Investments Total 0 0 10.8 0 10.8 0 0 10.8 0 10.8 4.173 0 9.768 0 13.941 29.083

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 4.173 0 8.868 0 13.041 31.727

IT Total 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 4.173 0 8.868 0 13.041 31.727

non-IT Total 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0

TIGTA Total 0 0 10.8 0 10.8 0 0 10.8 0 10.8 4.173 0 9.768 0 13.941 29.083

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 4.173 0 8.868 0 13.041 31.727

IT Total 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 0 0 9.9 0 9.9 4.173 0 8.868 0 13.041 31.727

non-IT Total 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0

TIGTA Major IT Investments

TIGTA non-Major IT Investments

TIGTA IT Infrastructure End User Systems and 

Support (ITI EUSS)

0 0 2.684 0 2.684 0 0 2.684 0 2.684 2.747 0 2.229 0 4.976 85.395

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0 0 2.684 0 2.684 0 0 2.684 0 2.684 2.747 0 2.229 0 4.976 85.395

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Mainframe and Servers 

Services and Support (ITI MSSS)

0 0 3.818 0 3.818 0 0 3.818 0 3.818 1.426 0 3.445 0 4.871 27.58

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0 0 3.818 0 3.818 0 0 3.818 0 3.818 1.426 0 3.445 0 4.871 27.58

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Telecommunications (ITT 

TSS)

0 0 2.716 0 2.716 0 0 2.716 0 2.716 0 0 2.888 0 2.888 6.333

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0 0 2.716 0 2.716 0 0 2.716 0 2.716 0 0 2.888 0 2.888 6.333

TIGTA PARIS Property Module (PPM) 0 0 0.201 0 0.201 0 0 0.201 0 0.201 0 0 0.201 0 0.201 0

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0 0 0.201 0 0.201 0 0 0.201 0 0.201 0 0 0.201 0 0.201 0

TIGTA Performance and Results Information System 

(PARIS)

0 0 0.481 0 0.481 0 0 0.481 0 0.481 0 0 0.105 0 0.105 -78.17

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0 0 0.481 0 0.481 0 0 0.481 0 0.481 0 0 0.105 0 0.105 -78.17

TIGTA non-IT Investments

TIGTA Vehicle Fleet 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0.9 0 0.9 0

PY 2014 Funding (Estimated Actuals) CY 2015 Funding (President's Budget) BY 2016 Funding (Requested)

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total % Change 

from CY to 

BY
Case 2:22-cr-00046-Z-BR Document 279 Filed 10/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 642
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ___________ 

No. 22-11071

___________ 

Jennifer VanDerStok; Michael G. Andren; Tactical 

Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company; Firearms Policy 

Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General; United States 

Department of Justice; Steven Dettelbach, in his official 

capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,

Defendants—Appellants,

consolidated with

___________ 

No. 22-11086

___________ 

Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing 

business as 80 Percent Arms,

Intervenor Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General; United States 

Department of Justice; Steven Dettelbach, in his official 

Case: 22-11071 Document: 00516878023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/30/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 259 Filed 08/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5187
No. 22-11071

c/w No. 22-11086

2

capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,

Defendants—Appellants.

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691

USDC No. 4:22-CV-691 

______________________________ 

ORDER:

IT IS ORDERED that Appellants’ opposed motion to dismiss the 

appeal is CARRIED WITH THE CASE.

LYLE W. CAYCE, CLERK

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

/s/ Lyle W. Cayce

ENTERED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COURT

Case: 22-11071 Document: 00516878023 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/30/2023

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 259 Filed 08/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 5188
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms,

 Intervenor-Plaintiff,

DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED, and

THE SECOND AMENDMENT 

FOUNDATION, INC.

 Intervenors-Plaintiffs,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his Official 

Capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States, et al.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED AND THE 

SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.’S 

MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Defense Distributed and the Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. (“SAF”) move for a 

preliminary injunction that parallels the preliminary injunctions already ordered with respect to 

Plaintiff Tactical Machining, LLC, Docs. 56, 84, 91, and Intervenor-Plaintiff BlackHawk 

Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms, Doc. 118. For Defense Distributed and SAF, the 

Court should issue an order—either a new injunction order or an order expanding the scope of its 

existing injunction—preliminarily enjoining the Defendants from enforcing the challenged 

redefinition of “firearm” in 27 C.F.R. §§ 478.11 and 27 C.F.R. §§ 478.11, see Definition of “Frame 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 163 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 3040
or Receiver” and Identification of Firearms, 87 Fed. Reg. 24,652 (Apr. 26, 2022), against Defense 

Distributed, its customers, and SAF’s members. A brief and evidence support this motion. 

The motion is opposed. 

Date: January 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Chad Flores 

Chad Flores

Texas Bar No. 24059759

cflores@beckredden.com

Beck Redden LLP

1221 McKinney St., Suite 4500

Houston, TX 77010

(713) 951-3700

(713) 951-3720 Fax

Counsel for Defense Distributed and the Second 

Amendment Foundation, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that counsel for Defense Distributed and the Second Amendment 

Foundation, Inc. conferred with Defendants’ counsel on December 19, 2022. Because the parties 

did not reach an agreement, this motion is opposed.

/s/ Chad Flores

Chad Flores

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 163 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 3041
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 119

To designate the weeks beginning May 2, 1993, and May 1, 1994, as

‘‘National Correctional Officers Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. BONIOR introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the weeks beginning May 2, 1993, and

May 1, 1994, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers Week’’.

Whereas the correctional officers who work in America’s jails

and prisons are responsible for the containment and control of over 1,200,000 prisoners;

Whereas correctional officers must protect inmates from violence while encouraging them to develop skills and attitudes that can help them become productive members of

society following their release;

Whereas the morale of correctional officers is affected by

many factors, and the public perception of the role of
2

•HJ 119 IH

correctional officers is more often based upon dramatization rather than factual review;

Whereas good job performance and public acceptance and appreciation require correctional officers to absorb the adverse attitudes present in confinement while maintaining

themselves as professionals;

Whereas correctional officers have been honored by many

States and localities;

Whereas correctional officers have been honored by joint resolutions of the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States in 1984, 1985, 1987, and 1989; and

Whereas the attitude and morale of correctional officers is a

matter worthy of serious congressional attention: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the weeks beginning May 2, 1993, and May 1, 1994,

4 are designated as ‘‘National Correctional Officers Week’’.

5 The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 on the people of the United States to observe such weeks

7 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Kathleen Rest, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, BSC, NIOSH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 715H, Washington, DC 20201, telephone: 202/401-0721, fax: 202/260-4464, e-mail: krx9@cdc.gov. 

The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 

Dated: November, 6, 2000.

Carolyn J. Russell, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 00-28899 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2015-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 

March 29, 2017

 
|   |   |                                                             |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RAYMON CERVANTES., JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. No. 3:22-CV-1802-C (BH)

DALLAS COUNTY CIU UNIT, et al.,

Dcfendants.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

SIGNED tni" -,51 a^vof December, 2022.

z?*4

SAM U GS

D STATES DIST .JTIDGE

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters ofrecord in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. $ 636(bX1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions

ofthe Court. The plaintifls lpplication to Proceed In District Court ll'ithout Prepaying Fees or

Costs (Long Form), filed on August 16,2022 (doc.4), is DENIED. The case will be dismissed

by separate judgment for fail,ure to prosecute or comply with court orders.

,1

Case 3:22-cv-01802-C-BH Document 11 Filed 12/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 230
# Annual Report

# Appeals

# Holidays