alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT §

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, §

 §

Plaintiff, § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1807-D

 §

and §

 §

SARAH BUDD, § 

 §

Intervenor-Plaintiff, §

 §

VS. § 

 §

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC., §

 §

Defendant. §

JUDGMENT

In a memorandum opinion and order filed on February 7, 2024, the court granted summary

judgment in part in favor of SkyWest Airlines, Inc. (“SkyWest”). Thereafter, the remaining claims

of plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and plaintiff-intervenor Sarah

Budd (“Budd”) for hostile work environment and retaliation were tried to a jury from November 12,

2024 to November 20, 2024. The jury returned a verdict partially in favor of the EEOC and Budd

and partially in favor of SkyWest.

Accordingly, it is ordered and adjudged that the EEOC and Budd jointly recover from

SkyWest the sum of $170,000 in compensatory damages and $130,000 in punitive damages, for a

total of $300,000 in damages, together with post-judgment interest on these sums at the rate of

4.35% per annum.

Case 3:22-cv-01807-D Document 150 Filed 11/20/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2191
The taxable costs of court, as calculated by the clerk of court, of the EEOC and Budd are

assessed against SkyWest.

Done at Dallas, Texas November 20, 2024.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

SENIOR JUDGE

- 2 -

Case 3:22-cv-01807-D Document 150 Filed 11/20/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2192
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.,as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer, Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, andWells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator,Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C23 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen,Managing Director of Special Servicing do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Excluded Mortgage Loan SpecialServicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the“Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during suchperiod has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the ExcludedMortgage Loan Special Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
SCPR-20-0000532

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE HILARY BENSON GANGNES, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Chan,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign and

surrender her license to practice law in the State of Hawai#i,

filed by the Honorable Hilary Benson Gangnes (Ret.), pursuant to

Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of

Hawai#i (RSCH), and the affidavits submitted in support thereof,

we conclude that Petitioner Gangnes has fully complied with the

requirements of RSCH Rule 1.10. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-20-0000532

11-SEP-2020

08:43 AM
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Gangnes shall be

allowed to maintain her paper law license as a memento.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Hilary Benson Gangnes, attorney number 5549,

from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective

with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 11, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

2
#### WOFFORD v. STATE.

No. 25554.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1951.

Crunk & Morgan, by W. H. Crank, Greenville, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Átty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was charged with the sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area and assessed a fine of $500.

The facts of the case would sustain the jury’s verdict if the trial had been conducted without the commission of reversible error.

Appellant took the witness stand in his own behalf and denied the sale. His Bill of Exception No. 1 shows that on cross-examination he was asked if he had ever had any for sale, and whether or not that business had ever gotten him into trouble before. The court overruled the objection to this question and the comity attorney went further into the matter by. asking him if he had, in August of 1945, been tried and convicted of a liquor law violation in the county court. The court then withdrew this evidence from the jury and instructed them not to ' consider it. The defendant pressed his objection and asked the court for a mistrial because of the incident above detailed.

It will not be necessary to discuss other complaints presented in the appeal. The asking of the question could not be cured by the court’s instruction. See Bowers v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 98, 134 S.W.2d 675; Vannoy v. State, 155 S.W.2d 368, 142 Tex. Cr.R. 543, and authorities discussed in these two opinions.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
#### BURTON v. STATE.

No. 26266.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

■ The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Lubbock County. The punishment assessed is a fine of $300.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts and bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Yan Guo, Chief Financial Officer of  the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 9, 2009
            /s/     Yan
      GuoYan
      GuoChief
      Finance Officer(Principal
      Finance Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK et al.,

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

 v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States et al., 

 Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Merrick Garland, in his official capacity as 

Attorney General of the United States; Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF); the United States Department of 

Justice; and ATF hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the 

Court’s Opinion & Order on Defense Distributed and the Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.’s 

Motion for a Preliminary Injunction entered on March 2, 2023 [ECF No. 188].

DATED: May 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

ALEXANDER K. HAAS

Director, Federal Programs Branch

LESLEY FARBY

Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch

/s/ Daniel Riess

DANIEL RIESS

TAISA M. GOODNATURE

JEREMY S.B. NEWMAN

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 210 Filed 05/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4624
2

Trial Attorneys

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

U.S. Department of Justice

1100 L Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 353-3098

Email: Daniel.Riess@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On May 1, 2023, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of court for 

the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the electronic case filing system of the court. 

I hereby certify that I have served all parties electronically or by another manner authorized by Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2).

/s/ Daniel Riess

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 210 Filed 05/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4625
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WAI T., §

Petitioner, §

§

v. § CIVIL NO. 3:22-CV-1044-B-BK

§

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., §

Respondents. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 9 day of August, 2022. th

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

__

Case 3:22-cv-01044-B-BK Document 20 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 237
^3 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Drake Aerial Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Air America 

Aerial Ads and James Miller 

Complainant, 

City of Cleveland 

Respondent. 

OCT 1 S 2009 

FAA Docket No. 16-09-02 

::':::i 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

Pursuant to 14 CFR Section 16.11(a), the Director does hereby extend the date that the 

Director's initial determination will be rendered, in the above referenced case, to on or 

before December 31, 2009. 

An extension of time is essential for a fair and complete hearing of the matter before the 

agency. 

Landall S. Fiertz 

Director, Office of Airport CompUance 

and Field Operations 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 19, 2009.1 caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid), a true copy of the foregoing document addressed 

to: 

Rebecca E. Dupuis 

Nathan A. Hall 

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP 

North Courthouse Square 

1000 Jackson Street 

Toledo, OH 43604 

Counsel for Complainant 

Edward W. Sauer 

Charles F. Donley, II 

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. 

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Robert J. Triozzi 

City of Cleveland Department of Law 

601 Lakeside Avenue, Room 106 

Cleveland, OH 44114 

Counsel for Respondent 

Hand Delivered to: 

Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

Deandra Brooks 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Field Operations
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arthur J. Bourgeois, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                                /s/ Arthur J. Bourgeois
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Arthur J. Bourgeois
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                April 29, 2005























                                       21
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 315 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 315

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating May 30, 1994, through June 6, 1994, as a ``Time for the 
   National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II''.

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States of America made tremendous 
        sacrifices during World War II to save the world from tyranny and 
        aggression;
Whereas the winds of freedom and democracy sweeping the globe today spring from 
        the principles for which over four hundred thousand Americans gave their 
        lives in World War II;
Whereas World War II and the events that led up to that war must be understood 
        in order that we may better understand our own times, and more fully 
        appreciate the reasons why eternal vigilance against any form of tyranny 
        is so important;
Whereas the World War II era, as reflected in its family life, industry, and 
        entertainment, was a unique period in American history and epitomized 
        our Nation's philosophy of hard work, courage, and tenacity in the face 
        of adversity;
Whereas, between 1991 and 1995, over nine million American veterans of World War 
        II will be holding reunions and conferences and otherwise commemorating 
        the fiftieth anniversary of various events relating to World War II; and
Whereas June 4, 1994, marks the anniversary of the Battle of Midway, and June 6, 
        1994, marks the anniversary of D-Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 30, 1994, through 
June 6, 1994, is designated as a ``Time for the National Observance of 
the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe that period with appropriate ceremonies 
and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
i\r;'i /\.\

1"7;'-r-*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

s

$

S

s

S

$

v

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CASE NO: 5:22-CR-089-H-BV-1

VICTOR ALFONSO

TOBAR.MELGAR

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA OF GUILTY

BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The defendant, by consent and under the authority of United States v. Dees,

125 F .3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), appeared with counsel for the purpose of entering a plea of

guilty under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This Report and

Recommendation is submitted to the Court under 28 lJ.S.C. $ 636(bX3).

The defendant was placed under oath and examined in open court concerning the

subjects of Rule I I of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The defendant was

advised regarding each subject and affirmed his/her understanding of each subject.

Pursuant to a written plea agreement with the government, the defendant pled guilty to

Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of 8 IJ.S.C. $ 1326(a), and 6II.S.C.

$$ 202(3),202(4), and 557-Illegal Re-Entry After Deportation.

After examining the defendant under oath, I find that:

The defendant, upon advice of counsel, consented orally and in writing

to enter this guilty plea before a magistratejudge subject to final

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge;

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the chargeS, including

each essential element of the offense(s) charged, and the associated

penalties;

1

lt

$.i../.

tr".|',*:

.-r1fi.tfTsii'i'

r. {!'"3 i-^ . 

:l;.+'} 

I

:#{J-?-p

Case 5:22-cr-00089-H-BV Document 27 Filed 10/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 47
3, The defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and

plea agreement supplement;

4, The defendant understands all his/her constitutional and statutory rights

and wishes to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury

and the right to appear before a [Jnited States district judge;

5

6

7

The defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily;

The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty;

There is a factual basis to support this plea; and

8. The ends ofjustice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of

guilty.

Based on the above, I recommend that the defendant's guilty plea be accepted, that

the defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly.

Although I have conducted these proceedings and accepted the defendant's guilty

plea, the lJnited States district judge has the power to review my actions and possesses

final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if the defendant has any

objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he is required to make

those known to the lJnited States district judge within fourteen (14) days of today.

Signed October 4,2024.

AMANI) AMY'R. BURCH

UxrrBo SrarBs M.q.cIsrRATE Juocn

Case 5:22-cr-00089-H-BV Document 27 Filed 10/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 48
October 1, 2007, revised 

DAS for Headquarters Operations

Office of Disclosure Services

Review of Current Holdings

The Department of the Treasury is required by Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) Circular A-130, Appendix 1, entitled “Federal Agency Responsibilities for 

Maintaining Records About Individuals,” to conduct periodic reviews of contracts, 

recordkeeping practices, routine use disclosures, exemption of systems of records, 

matching programs, Privacy Act training, violations of the Privacy Act, and the adequacy 

of the systems of records notices. In addition, Treasury regulation 31 CFR § 1.23(a)(1) 

requires the Department to publish a notice of the existence and character of all systems 

of records every three years in the Federal Register. 

The Department’s systems of records notices were last published in their entirety during 

2005. The Department is currently reviewing its systems of records to meet the 

requirements of section 1.23. At the same time, we are leveraging this effort to meet the 

new periodic review requirements under OMB Memo M-07-16, entitled “Safeguarding 

Against and Responding to the Breach of Personally Identifiable Information” (May 22, 

2007). That OMB memo provides guidance to agencies and is designed to ensure 

personally identifiable information holdings are reduced to the minimum necessary for 

the proper performance of a documented agency function. The following table provides 

summary information about the systems of records currently under review at the 

Department of the Treasury. 

Bureau 

 (# SORNs) 

Month/year 

bureaus tasked 

with review 

Month/year 

Review 

submitted to 

DS 

Month/year DS 

review 

completed 

Month/year 

Bureau PA 

inventory 

published in FR 

IRS Na 7/07 9/07 10/07 

TTB (1) Na 11/07 12/07 1/08 

FinCEN (3) 11/07 1/08 2/08 3/08 

MINT (8) 12/07 2/08 3/08 4/08 

BPD (9) 1/08 3/08 4/08 5/08 

OTS (9) 2/08 5/08 6/08 7/08 

OCC (11) 3/08 6/08 7/08 8/08 

FMS (13) 2/08 5/08 6/08 7/08 

BEP (15) 1/08 4/08 5/08 6/08 

DO (32) 11/07 2/08 2/08 3/08