alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 19, 2017

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | First Mining Finance Corp. (the
      Company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                      
|    | Consent of Expert                               
|    |                                                 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by
reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2016.

I, John F. Duncan, P.Eng., Associate of SRK Consulting (Canada)
Inc., hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my
involvement in the preparation of the following technical report:

Preliminary Economic Assessment for
the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada dated October 7, 2016 (the
Technical Report).

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ John F.
      Duncan, P.Eng.John F. Duncan, P.Eng.Associate ConsultantSRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.
----

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments

(2005/C 137/03)

The Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments will enter into force on 1 July 2005, the procedures provided for in Article 17 of the Agreement having been completed on 13 May 2005.

----
CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Concordia International Corp. (the “Corporation”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Corporation’s annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.








/s/ Edward BorkowskiName:Edward BorkowskiTitle:Chief Financial Officer


March 15, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 310 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 310

Designating March 25, 1994, as ``Greek Independence Day: A National Day 
           of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1994

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Porter, Mr. Stump, Mr. 
McCollum, Mr. Machtley, Mr. Fazio, Mr. Kolbe, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. King, Mr. 
Nadler, Mr. Thomas of Wyoming, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Sawyer, 
 Mr. Shaw, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Archer, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Filner, Mr. Miller 
of California, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Markey, Mr. Waxman, Mr. 
Lantos, Mr. Coyne, Mr. Kanjorski, Mr. Lehman, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. Pickett, 
  Mr. Synar, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Hansen, Miss Collins of Michigan, Mr. 
 Smith of Iowa, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. Blute, Mr. Dingell, 
  Mr. Wolf, Mr. Mollohan, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. 
Lipinski, Mr. Evans, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Lewis of Florida, Mr. Diaz-Balart, 
Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Edwards of California, 
Mr. Quillen, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Barrett of 
 Wisconsin, Mr. Neal of North Carolina, and Mr. Traficant) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Designating March 25, 1994, as ``Greek Independence Day: A National Day 
           of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy''.

Whereas the ancient Greeks developed the concept of democracy, in which the 
        supreme power to govern was vested in the people;
Whereas the Founding Fathers of the United States drew heavily upon the 
        political experience and philosophy of ancient Greece in forming the 
        representative democracy of the United States;
Whereas these and other ideals have forged a close bond both between the United 
        States and Greece and between their peoples;
Whereas March 25, 1994, marks the 173rd anniversary of the beginning of the 
        revolution that freed the Greek people from the Ottoman Empire and 
        enabled the reestablishment of democracy in Greece; and
Whereas it is proper and desirable to celebrate that anniversary with the Greek 
        people and to reaffirm the democratic principles from which the United 
        States and Greece were born: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That March 25, 1994, is 
designated as ``Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration 
of Greek and American Democracy'', and the President is authorized and 
requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United 
States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

                                     BY THE
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of LION, Inc., a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each
of Randall D. Miles, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Randall D. Miles                      /s/ Steve Thomson
------------------------------            ------------------------------
Randall D. Miles                          Steve Thomson

November 14, 2005                         November 14, 2005
------------------------------            ------------------------------
#### Sisters of St. Francis of Holy Name Province, Inc., Respondent, v Daemen College, Formerly Rosary Hill College, Defendant, and Edwin F. Jaeckle et al., Doing Business as Jaeckle, Fleischmann and Mugel, Appellants.

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in granting plaintiffs motion to strike in its entirety defendant law firm’s first notice to produce. We find that items 13 through 15 were properly stricken because the demands were overly broad; however, the court erred in striking items 1 through 12 and 16 through 19. Contrary to plaintiffs contentions, the subject matter was sufficiently defined despite the use of the word "all” *(see, Brown v Daisy Mfg. Co.,*129 AD2d 995), in some instances by specific reference to plaintiffs complaint *(see, Brady v Wyeth Labs.,*106 AD2d 795). Three items require specific comment. With re*898spect to item 1, which seeks all papers "turned over by [defendant law firm] to plaintiff’s attorney’s at the latter’s request”, plaintiff should be able to identify at least some of them by defendant law firm’s letterhead. Plaintiff concedes that item 18 was proper. Item 19, which seeks a copy of an organizational chart showing the interrelationship of plaintiff’s branches, was stricken after plaintiff argued that it has no branches. The court erred in striking that item; rather, plaintiff should respond by a sworn statement that it has no branches.

We further find that the court properly limited defendant law firm’s second notice to produce to records relating to transactions between plaintiff and Daemen College because that was the relief requested by defendant law firm in its argument before Special Term. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.—discovery.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
(logo)  LNRPartners, LLC  **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**** ****OF**** ****LNR PARTNERS, LLC**  The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows: 1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “Reporting Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy: /s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident  Dated: February 23, 2016  1601 Washington Avenue · Suite 700 · Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164Telephone: (305) 695-5600 · Fax: (305) 695-5601  **Schedule I**  JPMBB 2015-C27JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015 C27, Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2015-C27  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue, 32nd FloorNew York NY 10179 Bianca A. Russo J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 383 Madison Avenue, 31st FloorNew York NY 10179 Kunal K. Singh Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc., 845 Third Avnue, 4th Floor Attention: CMBS Surveillance New York NY 10022General Contact Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 7 World Trade Center250 Greenwich StreetAttn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillace Group New York NY 10007General Contact Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC 220 Gibraltar Road, Suite 300 Attn: CMBS Surveillance Horsham PA 19044General Contact Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC1065 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor New York NY 10018General Contact Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia MD 21045 Group Notices Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road MAC N2702-011Columbia MD 21045-1951 Josh S. Grimard
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 271

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 4 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the month of November in each of calendar

years 1993 and 1994 as ‘‘National American Indian

Heritage Month’’.

Whereas American Indians were the original inhabitants of

the lands that now constitute the United States of

America;

Whereas American Indian Governments developed the fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separation

of powers in government, and these principles form the

foundation of the United States Government today;

Whereas American Indian societies have exhibited a respect

for the finiteness of natural resources through deep respect for the earth, and these values continue to be widely held today;
2

HJ 271 RFS

Whereas American Indian people have served with valor in all

wars from Revolutionary War to the conflict in the Persian Gulf, often in a percentage well above their percentage in the population of the Nation as a whole;

Whereas American Indians have made distinct and important

contributions to America and the rest of the world in

many fields, including agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;

Whereas American Indians deserve to be recognized for their

individual contributions to American society as artists,

sculptors, musicians, authors, poets, artisans, scientists,

and scholars;

Whereas designating the month of November in each of calendar years 1993 and 1994 to recognize the heritage and

the contributions to American society of American Indians will encourage self-esteem, pride, and self-awareness

in American Indians of all ages; and

Whereas November is traditionally the month when American

Indians have harvested their crops and is generally a

time of celebration and giving thanks: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That—

4 (1) the month of November in each of calendar

5 years 1993 and 1994 is designated as ‘‘National

6 American Indian Heritage Month’’; and

7 (2) the President is authorized and requested to

8 issue a proclamation in each of those years calling
3

HJ 271 RFS

1 on the people of the United States to observe such

2 month with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives November 2,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 160 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 160

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
limiting the period of time United States Senators and Representatives 
                               may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 1993

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Barcia, Mr. Armey, Mr. 
Goss, Mr. Crane, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Thomas of Wyoming, and Mr. Fields of 
Texas) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
limiting the period of time United States Senators and Representatives 
                               may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. No person may serve in Congress more than 2 full terms 
as a Senator. No person may serve in Congress more than 3 full terms as 
a Representative.
    ``Section 2. Service as a Senator or Representative before this 
article takes effect shall not be taken into account in determining 
service under section 1.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.15


 


Party A: Sanhe Xiangtian Electric Engineering Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Shandong Thaidai Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.


 


After agreement from both parties, according to the PRC common
law enforced agreement signed by Sanhe Xiangtian Electric Engineering on March 10 th , 2014, supplement terms are added
to the Haide Group 10MW distributed photovoltaic project.


 


Contract volume and price


 


According to the construction progress assessed by Haide Group,
the original 10MW will be amended to 8.5MW. 5.988MW has now been completed, leaving the 2.512MW volume pending to be completed.
Description as below:


 


Name: Battery board


 


Style: P250


 


Unit price: 6.651


 


Quantity: 10048


 


Total: RMB16,707,312


 


Obligation:


 


Ni Baofeng will be a guarantor to this supplement contract,
who will share the joint liability with the two parties.Ni Baofeng promises not to pay party B with the money received from party
A unless have the permission of party A, or he will bear the whole losses of party A (if any).


 


Payment method:


 


After the signing of this supplement contract, party A shall
be required to pay party B RMB3,000,000 within three working days. Party B shall perform installation within two working days after
receiving the first payment.


 


Party A shall be required to pay the guarantor Ni baofung RMB10,000,000
for temporary custody. Party B shall issue a full amount invoice to party A within three working days after Ni baofung received
the RMB10,000,000 custody fee, otherwise terminating the contract.


 


Party A agreed to pay another RMB6,000,000 to Ni baofung on
or before February 5, 2015, otherwise terminating the contract.


 


The remaining contract fee shall be cleared before April 1,
2015, after party B has completed all the construction listed in the contract (besides the deposit of RMB2,800,000).


 


Contract signed date: January 4, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          35,926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                       273
<INVENTORY>                                      1,214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,368
<PP&E>                                           3,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,517
<OTHER-SE>                                    (33,396)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,368
<SALES>                                          8,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,321
<CGS>                                            3,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   124
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,116)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                     FOOD COURT ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                  SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three months ended        Nine months ended
                                               September 30, 1995        September 30, 1995
                                               ------------------        ------------------
<S>                                               <C>                       <C>         
Net Loss                                          ($824,847)                ($2,999,145)

  Reduction of interest and
  amortization of financing costs                                               321,763

  Interest on hypothetical investment                                            29,048

  Dividends on Preferred Stock                      (22,925)                    (91,700)

  Preferred stock discount                           (6,941)                    (27,763)
                                                 -----------                ------------

Adjusted Net Loss                                 ($854,713)                ($2,767,797)
                                                 ===========                ============

Weighted average shares outstanding               1,073,125                   1,959,964
                                                 ===========                ============

NET LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK                   ($0.80)                     ($1.41)
                                                 ===========                ============
</TABLE>

                                       14
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 117

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)