alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-231-K (01)

§

JOSE ALBERTO SALINAS §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry 

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation 

Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections 

thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it 

is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and 

Plea Agreement and the Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed 

in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Signed August 26th, 2022.

_____________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00231-K Document 26 Filed 08/26/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 49
# Official Journal C 431/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 431 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5922 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 431

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5922 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2016/C 431/01 | Position (EU) No 20/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/34/EU as regards the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail and the governance of the railway infrastructureAdopted by the Council on 17 October 2016 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 431/02 | Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 20/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/34/EU as regards the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail and the governance of the railway infrastructure | 18 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2016/C 431/01

Position (EU) No 20/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/34/EU as regards the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail and the governance of the railway infrastructureAdopted by the Council on 17 October 2016 (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 431/02

Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 20/2016 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/34/EU as regards the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail and the governance of the railway infrastructure

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### ISAACS v. HAYS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 6, 1953.

Edward T. Ewen, Jr., Louisville, for appellant.

Julius Leibson and Louis Brownstein, Louisville, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

This action was filéd by William Hays against his former landlord, W. O. Isaacs, under the Federal Housing and Rental Act of 1947, as amended, for-treble the amount allegedly paid by Hays as rent in excess of the ceiling price. 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq. He recovered judgment in the amount of $681.75 and the landlord appeals.

The amount of the overcharge is definitely established as' .$227.25 over a period of nine months, and most of defendant’s argument is directed against the treble damages phase of the judgment. The excess payments having been established, it was incumbent upon the defendant, in order to avoid the penalty judgment, to show that the violation was neither willful nor the result of failure to take practicable precautions. against violations. Section 205 of the .Housing and Rental Act; Adams v. Backlund, D.C., 81 F.Supp. 643, McRae v. Creedon, 10 Cir., 162 F.2d 989. In this case that was a question of fact for the jury and the jury decided against the defendant..

We find' no substance in- the argument that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence, or that the overcharge represented liquidated damages for holding over *930rather than rent for the premises. It appears that the landlord’s real complaint is against the law itsélf rather than against the application of the law.

Some criticism is made of the argument to the jury by plaintiff’s counsel. Admittedly some of his remarks were improper, but the court sustained an objection to the remarks and admonished the jury to disregard them. We think the admonition cured the error. "Defendant’s counsel apparently thought so toó, as no motion was made to discharge the jury.'

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DEBORAH A. PRUITT, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-CV-1325-M-BK

§

JOHN F. WARREN, ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.

SO ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-01325-M-BK Document 8 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 422
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C23,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C23

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# Official Journal C 257A/19 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 257A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4719 October 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 257A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4719 October 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 257A/2 | Guide for applicants | 3 |
| 2004/C 257A/3 | Notice of open competition COM/AD/3/04 for the recruitment of a head of unit in the field of research (A*11). Candidates must have a university degree and a minimum of 12 years professional experience. | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 257A/2

Guide for applicants

3

2004/C 257A/3

Notice of open competition COM/AD/3/04 for the recruitment of a head of unit in the field of research (A*11). Candidates must have a university degree and a minimum of 12 years professional experience.

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 26, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60902

Summary Calendar

RAHIM MAKNOJIA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A95-453-791

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rahim Maknojia petitions for review of an order to the Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an order of the

immigration judge (IJ) denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and for relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). 

Maknojia does not dispute that he did not file a timely

asylum application, but he argues that he met his burden of

showing that extraordinary circumstances prevented his timely

filing. We lack jurisdiction to review this claim, and the
No. 05-60902

-2-

petition for review as to this claim is dismissed. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(a)(3); Zhu v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 521, 527 (5th Cir. 2005).

Maknojia challenges the determination that he is not

entitled to withholding of removal based on his Muslim religion

or to protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We

must defer to the BIA’s decision unless the evidence compels a

contrary conclusion. Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197

(5th Cir. 1996). The determination that Maknojia is not entitled

to withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality

Act (INA) or to protection under the CAT is supported by

substantial evidence, and Maknojia has not shown that the record

compels a contrary conclusion. The petition for review is denied

as to these claims.

DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6949

RAYMOND CALVIN VAN FIELD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-01048-PWG)

Submitted: February 27, 2018 Decided: April 4, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Calvin Van Field, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Calvin Van Field seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his 

filing as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying relief. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When 

the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Van Field has not 

made the requisite showing. To the extent Van Field intended his filing to be an appeal 

of the state courts’ dismissal of his motion to reopen proceedings, the district court lacked

subject matter jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal, as “a United States District Court 

has no authority to review final judgments of a state court in judicial proceedings.” D.C.

Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). In any event, Van Field has 

failed to demonstrate a debatable claim of the denial of a federal constitutional right. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 135 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 135

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 To designate the months of May 1993 and May 1994 as ``National Trauma 
                           Awareness Month''.



                                     


103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 135

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
 To designate the months of May 1993 and May 1994 as ``National Trauma 
                           Awareness Month''.

Whereas more than 9,000,000 individuals in the United States suffer traumatic 
        injury each year;
Whereas traumatic injury is the leading cause of death for individuals under 44 
        years of age in the United States;
Whereas every individual is a potential victim of traumatic injury;
Whereas traumatic injury often occurs without warning;
Whereas traumatic injury frequently renders its victims incapable of caring for 
        themselves;
Whereas past inattention to the causes and effects of trauma has led to the 
        inclusion of trauma among the most neglected medical conditions in the 
        United States;
Whereas it is estimated that the people of the United States will spend more 
        than $175,000,000,000 this year on the problem of trauma;
Whereas trauma is preventable and increased efforts to prevent trauma would 
        reduce or eliminate deaths and disability due to trauma;
Whereas the problem of trauma can be remedied only by prevention and treatment 
        through emergency medical services and trauma systems; and
Whereas the people of the United States must be educated in the prevention and 
        treatment of trauma and in the proper and effective use of emergency 
        medical systems: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 1993 and May 1994 are 
each designated as ``National Trauma Awareness Month'' and the 
President is authorized and directed to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe these months with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
#### Joseph C. RASSO, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22630.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 17, 1943.

Leonard Brown and Jas. Tafolla, Jr., both of San Antonio, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

Since his appeal was perfected, appellant has filed his affidavit, duly verified, requesting that his appeal be withdrawn. The request is granted and the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### BIGGS v. STATE.

No. 22188.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1942.

Reid & Reid, of Abilene, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale. The penalty assessed is a fine of $250.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence thereof nothing has been presented to this court for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29581]



[[Page 69758]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 696]


PacifiCorp; Notice of Authorization for Continued Project 
Operation

November 14, 2000.

    On October 27, 1998, PacifiCorp, licensee for the American Fork 
Project No. 696, filed an application for a new or subsequent license 
pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's 
regulations thereunder. Project No. 696 is located on American Fork 
Creek in Utah County, Utah.
    The license for Project No. 696 was issued for a period ending 
October 31, 2000. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year to year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in Section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of Section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on Section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 696 is issued to 
PacifiCorp for a period effective November 1, 2000, through October 31, 
2001, or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other 
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new 
license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before 
November 1, 2001, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.18(c), an annual license under Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to Section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that PacifiCorp is authorized to continue operation of the 
American Fork Project No. 696 until such time as the Commission acts on 
its application for subsequent license.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29581 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Official Journal C 296/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 296 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 653 August 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 296

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 653 August 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 296/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10290 – MICROSOFT / NUANCE) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 296/02 | Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10398 – DNB / DANSKE BANK / OP / SB1 / EIKA / BALDER / VIPPS / MOBILEPAY / PIVO) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 296/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10290 – MICROSOFT / NUANCE) (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 296/02

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.10398 – DNB / DANSKE BANK / OP / SB1 / EIKA / BALDER / VIPPS / MOBILEPAY / PIVO) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 296/03 | Euro exchange rates — 2 August 2022 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 296/03

Euro exchange rates — 2 August 2022

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 296/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10408 – AIP / ALVANCE DUFFEL TARGET BUSINESS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2022/C 296/05 | Notice to operators – Imports of Russian crude oil or petroleum products into the Union | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 296/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10408 – AIP / ALVANCE DUFFEL TARGET BUSINESS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2022/C 296/05

Notice to operators – Imports of Russian crude oil or petroleum products into the Union

6

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services ( OJ C 210, 25.5.2022 ) | 8 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services ( OJ C 210, 25.5.2022 )

( OJ C 210, 25.5.2022 )

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN