alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69413-69414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27677]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9903-05-OCFO]

Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory Board; Public 
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory 
Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 
Environmental Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will hold a public 
meeting on December 12-13, 2013. EFAB is an EPA advisory committee 
chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to provide 
advice and recommendations to EPA on creative approaches to funding 
environmental programs, projects, and activities. This meeting, 
originally scheduled for October 22-23, 2013, is rescheduled because of 
the government shutdown.
    The purpose of this meeting is to hear from informed speakers on 
environmental finance issues, proposed legislation, and EPA priorities; 
to discuss activities, progress, and preliminary recommendations with 
regard to current EFAB work projects; and to consider requests for 
assistance from EPA offices.
    Environmental finance discussions, and presentations are expected 
on the following topics: tribal environmental programs; transit-
oriented development in sustainable communities, energy efficiency/
green house gas emissions reduction; drinking water pricing and 
infrastructure investment; and green infrastructure.
    The meeting is open to the public; however, seating is limited. All 
members of the public who wish to attend the meeting must register in 
advance no later than Friday December 6, 2013.

DATES: The full board meeting will be held on Thursday, December 12, 
2013 from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m., EST and Friday, December 13, 2013 from 
9-12 noon., EST.

ADDRESSES: Potomac Yard North, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Suite 4120, 
Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on access or services 
for individuals with disabilities, or to request accommodations for a 
person with a disability, please contact Sandra Williams, U.S. EPA, at 
(202) 564-4999 or williams.sandra@epa.gov, at least 10 days prior to 
the meeting, to allow as

[[Page 69414]]

much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: November 12, 2013.
Joshua Baylson,
Associate Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-27677 Filed 11-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes. In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James G. Bradley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. Date: May 11, 2004By:
    /s/ James G. BradleyJames G. BradleyChief Executive Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an Exhibit to this report and should not be considered filed as a
part of this report. 32
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 176 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 176

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                    protecting reproductive rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1993

Mrs. Mink introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                    protecting reproductive rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The right of individuals to have full control over reproductive 
decisions affecting their own bodies shall not be abridged.''

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 411 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 411

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Designating October 29, 1994, as ``National Firefighters Day''.

Whereas there are over 2,000,000 firefighters in the United States;
Whereas firefighters respond to more than 2,300,000 fires and 8,700,000 
        emergencies other than fires each year;
Whereas fires annually cause nearly 6,000 deaths and $10,000,000,000 in property 
        damages;
Whereas firefighters have given their lives and risked injury to preserve the 
        lives and protect the property of others;
Whereas the contributions and sacrifices of valiant firefighters often go 
        unreported and are inadequately recognized by the public; and
Whereas the work of firefighters deserves the attention and gratitude of all 
        individuals in the United States: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 29, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Firefighters Day'', and the President of the 
United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States to observe the day with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|U.S. Refinery Propane/Propylene Working Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|U.S. Refinery Propane/Propylene Working Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 13,312 | 17,017 | 15,118 | 15,488 | 14,820 | 14,650 | 14,946 | 14,142
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 13,913 | 14,883 | 15,269 | 14,659 | 15,713 | 13,942 | NA     | 15,424 | NA     | 15,280
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 12,790 | 13,455 | 14,157 | 12,336 | 12,779 | 11,759 | 12,859 | 9,821  | 9,831  | 8,309 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8,150  | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
### QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: 9101/2007 

### Revision


# Record ofContacts DMS Docket No. FAA-200 With whom outside the FAAhas this proposal been discussed (e,g., A1'A, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization PersOIl Contacted Date 

### ATA Joe White 03/3012009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This isthe Correct Revision Before Use
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

y0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

143961

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143961 COA: 302208 Wayne CC: 06-010957 GREGORY WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 30, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Systemic Sovereign Credit Risk:

 Lessons from the U.S. and Europe

Andrew Ang

Francis A. Longstaff

UCLA Anderson School 
Overview

 Sovereign credit risk.

 The ongoing European debt crisis.

 Recent U.S. Treasury downgrade.

 Increasing concerns about the solvency of U.S. states.

 The ever widening ripples from these shocks have affected 

many other financial markets and have raised fears that 

sovereign credit risk may be far more systemic that previously 

anticipated.

 How much of sovereign credit risk is systemic?

 What drives systemic sovereign credit risk?
Overview

 This paper provides a new perspective on systemic credit risk by 

studying and contrasting the credit risk of sovereigns within two 

important currency unions:

 The Eurozone.

 The U.S.

 The study makes use of a novel set of sovereign CDS spread 

data for the U.S. and individual states that has just become 

available.

 U.S. states are sovereign borrowers since under the U.S. 

Constitution, they may repudiate their debts without borrowers 

being able to claim assets in a bankruptcy process.

 Differs from Municipalities which are subject to Chapter 9.
Overview

 Given that states have tighter fiscal, political, and economic 

linkages that is the case within the Eurozone, we would expect 

that there is greater systemic risk among U.S. sovereigns.

 We find that the opposite is true:

 Only 12% of U.S. sovereign credit risk is systemic.

 In contrast, 31% of Eurozone credit risk is systemic.

 Correlations of CDS spreads are higher in Europe.

 Results provide evidence against the hypothesis that tighter 

macroeconomic linkages lead to higher levels of systemic risk.

 We must look elsewhere to understand the source of systemic 

sovereign credit risk.
Overview

 We find that the systemic credit risk of both the U.S. and the 

Eurozone is strongly related to financial market factors:

 Systemic risk declines as stock markets rally.

 Systemic risk declines as corporate bond markets rally.

 Systemic risk in the U.S. increases as financial firms funding costs 

increase.

 Systemic risk in both Europe and the U.S. is tightly linked to China.

 Increases in market volatility reduces U.S. systemic risk—flight to 

quality benefits?

 These results suggest that systemic sovereign risk has its roots 

in financial markets rather than in macroeconomic 

fundamentals.







Systemic Risk

 There are many definitions of systemic risk in the literature.

 We use the Duffie and Singleton (2003) multivariate credit 

model. In this setting, default happens in one of two ways.

 When a sovereign defaults for country-specific reasons.

 When an economic shock occurs that could potentially affect all 

countries. After the shock, each sovereign now has some 

probability of defaulting, where the probability may differ across 

sovereigns. Thus, multiple defaults can occur in the wake of a 

shock. Furthermore, each sovereign’s probability of default given a 

shock measures its degree of systemic risk.
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 328

Designating the week beginning May 1, 1994, as ‘‘Arson Awareness Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1994

Mr. WELDON (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. BOEHLERT, and Mr. VALENTINE)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning May 1, 1994, as ‘‘Arson

Awareness Week’’.

Whereas fires annually cause nearly 6,000 deaths and

$10,000,000,000 in property damage in the United

States;

Whereas the United States has higher fire property loss per

capita than any other industrialized country;

Whereas there are 100,000 known incendiary fires, 50,000

incendiary vehicle fires, and 25,000 incendiary wildland

fires annually in the United States;
2

•HJ 328 IH

Whereas arson is responsible for approximately 25 percent of

all fires in the United States;

Whereas one of the leading causes of fire deaths in the

United States is arson, which accounts for over 700

deaths annually in the United States;

Whereas arson is the leading cause of property damage due

to fire in the United States, and is responsible for losses

of $2,000,000,000, or approximately 1 of every 4 dollars

lost to fire, annually in the United States;

Whereas, according to the National Fire Protection Association, only 1⁄3 of the suspicious and incendiary fires in the

United States are confirmed as arson;

Whereas 13 of the 22 fire storms in Southern California in

October and November of 1993 were caused by arson,

and resulted in over 126,000 burned acres, $320,000,000

in damage, and injury to 97 people; and

Whereas a week set aside for arson awareness would increase

public knowledge about the large impact of the crime:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning May 1, 1994, is designated as

4 ‘‘Arson Awareness Week’’, and the President is authorized

5 and requested to issue a proclamation calling on all public

6 officials and the people of the United States to observe

7 the week with appropriate programs and activities.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

  

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2015-MS1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-MS1

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b)  To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  --------------------------------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Andean Development Company (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pedro Pablo Errazuriz,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002
                                /s/ Pedro Pablo Errazuriz
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Pedro Pablo Errazuriz, President and Chief
                                Executive Officer
Case 3:22-cv-01794-M-BK Document 10 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 25
State Small Business Credit Initiative

Data Release Protocol

In publishing the program transaction data, the State Small Business Credit Initiative 

(SSBCI) has created a set of criteria to determine what data fields to make publicly 

available while still ensuring the privacy of the organizations that participated in the 

initiative. The objective of these criteria is to make the widest array of information 

available while protecting the identities of those companies that received financing. Below 

are the criteria as well as the specific data fields that have been suppressed or removed 

from the dataset prior to publication. Data field definitions can be found in the SSBCI Data 

Definitions document.

Criteria for Suppression or Removal of Data Fields:

Data fields including any of the following have been suppressed or removed from the 

dataset prior to publication:

• All tax and regulatory identifiers

• Information that explicitly identifies and individual or company

• Information that, due to specificity, may reveal the identity of an individual or 

company receiving financing, and whose value can otherwise be conveyed 

Data Fields Suppressed or Removed

1) Unique ID

Unique ID’s submitted by the states occasionally include information that explicitly 

identifies the business receiving financing. This data field has thus been suppressed in 

publication, and has been replaced with standardized unique ID’s that do not carry any 

information that could be used to identify the business receiving financing. 

2) Census Tract

Census Tract data has been removed due to its specificity, which may reveal the identity 

of an individual or company receiving financing. An additional binary data field 

identifying whether or not the transaction occurred in a “Low Income” or “Medium 

Income” area has been added, thus conveying the value of this data field without the 

specific Census Tract data needing to be revealed. 
3) Lender EIN

Lender EIN data has been removed because it consists of tax identifiers.

4) Lender Regulatory ID

Lender Regulatory ID data has been removed because it consists of regulatory 

identifiers.

5) Optional Business EIN

Optional Business EIN data has been removed because it consists of tax identifiers.

6) Optional Business Name

Optional Business Name data has been removed because it explicitly identifies 

individuals or companies.

7) Optional Business Street Address

Optional Business Street Address data has been removed because it explicitly identifies 

individuals or companies.