Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 222 / Thursday, November 16, 2000 / Notices 69283

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews;

64 FR 41915 (August 2, 1999), and Chrome-Plated

Lug Nuts from China and Taiwan, 64 FR 41949

(August 2, 1999).

2See Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the People’s

Republic of Chin and Taiwan; Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Sunset Reviews: 65 FR 11762

(March 6, 2000).

environmental consequences discussed

in the FSEIS, and applicable laws,

regulations, and policies in making

decisions regarding these revisions. The

responsible official will document the

decisions and reasons for the decisions

in a Record of Decision. The decision

will be subject to appeal in accordance

with 36 CFR 215.

Dated: October 30, 2000.

Robert L. Storch,

Forest Supervisor, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre

and Gunnison National Forests, Rocky

Mountain Region, USDA Forest Service.

[FR Doc. 00–29283 Filed 11–15–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Gold/Boulder/Sullivan, Kootenai

National Forest, Lincoln County,

Montana

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of revision of intent to

prepare an environmental impact

statement.

SUMMARY: The USDA—Forest Service is

revising its notice of intent to prepare an

Environmental Impact Statement for the

Gold/Boulder/Sullivan Project, as

described in the Federal Register dated

March 24, 2000 (Vol. 65, No. 58, Pages

15892–15895), due to the following

major changes:

1. The filing of the DEIS will be

delayed more than six months, and

2. There will be changes to the

Proposed Action

The delay and changes are

attributable to wildfires that occurred in

the Gold/Boulder/Sullivan Project Area

during August 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Ron

Komac, Acting NEPA Coordinator,

Rexford Ranger District, Phone (406)

296–7130.

Dated: November 7, 2000.

Bob Castaneda,

Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest.

[FR Doc. 00–29387 Filed 11–15–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and

Stockyards Administration

Advisory Committee Meeting

Pursuant to the provisions of section

10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), notice

is hereby given of the following

committee meeting:

Name: Grain Inspection Advisory

Committee.

Dates: November 28–29, 2000.

Place: Crystal City Marriott, 1999 Jefferson

Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia.

Time: 8 am–5 pm on November 28 and 8

am–11:30 am on November 29, 2000.

Purpose: To provide advice to the

Administrator of the Grain Inspection,

Packers and Stockyards Administration

(GIPSA) with respect to the implementation

of the U.S. Grain Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 71

et seq.).

The agenda includes a review and

discussion of GIPSA’s financial status,

wheat dockage proposal,

reauthorization, biotechnology, research

initiatives, standardization and training

services for the grain industry,

certification of producers and grain

elevators, and other related issues

concerning the delivery of grain

inspection and weighing services to

American agriculture.

Public participation will be limited to

written statements, unless permission is

received from the Committee Chairman

to orally address the Committee.

Persons, other than members, who wish

to address the Committee or submit

written statements before or after the

meeting, should contact the

Administrator, GIPSA, U.S. Department

of Agriculture, 1400 Independence

Avenue, SW., STOP 3601, Washington,

DC 20250–3601, telephone (202) 720–

0219 or FAX (202) 205–9237.

The meeting will be open to the

public. Persons with disabilities who

require alternative means of

communication of program information

or related accommodations should

contact Marianne Plaus, telephone (202)

690–3460 or FAX (202) 205–9237.

Dated: November 9, 2000.

David R. Shipman,

Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,

Packers and Stockyards Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–29474 Filed 11–15–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–EN–U

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–808; A–583–810]

Revocation of Antidumping Duty

Orders: Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From

the People’s Republic of China and

Taiwan

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce

ACTION: Notice of revocation of

antidumping duty orders: chromeplated lug nuts from the People’s

Republic of China and Taiwan.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 751(c) of

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the

Act’’), the United States International

Trade Commission (‘‘the Commission’’)

determined that revocation of the

antidumping duty orders on chromeplated lug nuts from the People’s

Republic of China (‘‘China’’) and

Taiwan is not likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury to an industry in the United

States within a reasonably foreseeable

time. See 65 FR 66558 (November 6,

2000). Therefore, pursuant to section

751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR

351.222(i)(1), the Department of

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is

revoking the antidumping duty orders

on chrome-plated lug nuts from China

and Taiwan. Pursuant to section

751(c)(6)(A)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR

351.222(i)(2), the effective date of

revocation is January 1, 2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martha V. Douthit or James P. Maeder,

Office of Policy for Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–5050 or (202) 482–

3330, respectively.

Background

On August 2, 1999, the Department

initiated, and the Commission

instituted, sunset reviews of the

antidumping duty orders on chromeplated lug nuts from China and Taiwan,

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.1

As a result of the reviews, the

Department found that revocation of the

antidumping duty orders would be

likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of dumping and notified the

Commission of the magnitude of the

margins likely to prevail were the

antidumping orders revoked.2

On November 6, 2000, the

Commission determined, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation

of the antidumping duty orders on

chrome-plated lug nuts from China and

Taiwan would not likely lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury to an industry in the United

States within a reasonably foreseeable

time. See Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts from

China and Taiwan, 65 FR 66558

(November 6, 2000) and USITC