alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

SHARON RENEE CRAVER, § 

 § 

Plaintiff, § 

§ 

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1884-N 

§ 

CHAMPION MORTAGE, ET AL., § 

§ 

Defendants. § 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding 

none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2022. 

 _________________________________________ 

DAVID C. GODBEY 

CHIEF UNITED STATES 

DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-01884-N-BN Document 11 Filed 10/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
S10-l()()3()2-()4 ;

Boar d o f DiwctOBJ , Chaiima n Stan Gree n Vice-Chainna n PhiUpTaJd o Sec«tai y Virgini aMocivnik Treasure r Ar t Morri s Lync h Butle

r Scot t Comiskey Clar k Irwi n Mik e Johnso n Howar d Ker r . Tu n McCarle y MikcMos i Phi l Phillips , Jr . Bil l Schwyfaar

t Burto n Suc y Lega l Counci l Joh n Elro d Airpor t Directo r Kell y L.Johnson , A.A.E . Ajst . Airpor t

Directo r Mark H . MelUnger , A.A.E . Directo r o f Financ e Terr y L . Frankli n Executiv e Directo r

an d CE O Scot t Va n Laningha

m '^ > ^orthwestAifcansa s 

# FLyF;XM V

> vRegiona l Airpor t

Februar y 23,201 0 Th e Hojaorable Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-003 4 Dea r Mr . Secretary : Thank yo u for th e opportunit

y t o expres s m

y suppor t for th e applicatio n for

antitrus t immunit y an d propose d join t

busines s agreement

filed b y American Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vital for th e onewori d allianc e to compet e effectively wit h th e Sta r an d SkyTea

malliances . Thi s increase d allianc e competitio n wil l in tur n enhanc e th e benefit s of th e Department' s Ope

n Skie s polic y - first

b y solidifyin g U.S . - Japa n Open Skies , the n b y servin g a s afoundatio n fo r furthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte r athorough , review , I encourag e th e Department o f Transportatio n to approv e thi s application , a s i t

woul d enabl e thes e onewori d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel y togethe

r t o deliver highl y competitiv e ai r

transportatio n services . Approva l for AA/JAL allianc e wil l hav e apositiv e impac t o n ai r trave l b y offering customer s more service , schedulin g and pricin g option s an d wil l hel p to ensure tha t customer s continu e to benefi t fro mth e competitio n afforded b y thre e competitiv e ai r alliances . I urg e you t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely ,

Kell y L . Johnson , A.A.E . Airpor t Directo r Northwes t Arkansa s Regional Airpor t On e Airpor

t Blv d St e 100 Bentonville , A

R7271 2

Alic e L . Walto n Termina l Buildin g On e Airpor t

Boulevar d • Suit e 10 0 • Bentonville , A R7271 2 Phone : 479-205-100 0 • Fax:479-205-100 1

flyxna.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-229-Y 

 § 

MONTAVION JONES (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 8, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00229-Y Document 46 Filed 09/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 96
14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT GEORGE L. ALLEN COURTS BUILDING

600 COMMERCE STREET DALLAS, TEXAS 75202-4604 August 01, 2022

File Copy

DC—22—05135 ELLA CAINE, ct a1 VS. EDUVISION, INC.

ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD AND PRO SE PARTIES:

The above case is set for dismissal, pursuantto Rule 165A, Texas Rules ofCivil procedure and pursuant

to the inherent power ofthe Court, on:

August 29, 2022 at 2:00 PM

If n0 answer has been filed you are expected t0 have moved for default judgment on or prior

to that date. Your failure to have done so will result in the dismissal ofthe case on the above date.

Ifyou have been unable to obtain service of process and you Wish to retain the case on the docket, you must appear on the above date, unless you have obtained new setting from the court coordinator.

Sincerely,

ERIC V. MOYE, DISTRICT JUDGE

14TH DISTRICT COURT Dallas County, Texas Cc: DON NGUYEN

7211 REGENCY SQUARE BLVD

SUITE 220 HOUSTON TX 77036

EXHIBIT L

Case 3:22-cv-01713-S Document 1-12 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited
Company (the "Company") for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 9, 2004

                                            /s/ Thomas J. McDonald
                                            -----------------------
                                            Thomas J. McDonald
                                            Chief Financial Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) Νo 1132/2005

of 14 July 2005         

fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (2), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1518/95 are hereby fixed as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2004 (OJ L 280, 31.8.2004, p. 13).

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 55. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2993/95 (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 14 July 2005 fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice

----

(1)  No refund shall be granted on products given a heat treatment resulting in pregelatinisation of the starch.

(2)  Refunds are granted in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2730/75 (OJ L 281, 1.11.1975, p. 20), as amended.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000941914                       
<NAME>                        Smithway Motor Xpress Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000                 
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars
                
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998               
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999               
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999               
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.0              
<CASH>                          1534               
<SECURITIES>                    0           
<RECEIVABLES>                   20661               
<ALLOWANCES>                    69               
<INVENTORY>                     1527               
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                26681               
<PP&E>                          116596               
<DEPRECIATION>                  28920               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  120573               
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           18952               
<BONDS>                         52556          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0               
<PREFERRED>                     0               
<COMMON>                        50               
<OTHER-SE>                      36735              
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    120573               
<SALES>                         0               
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                47295               
<CGS>                           0               
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   44145               
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0               
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0               
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              913               
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2237               
<INCOME-TAX>                    933               
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1304               
<DISCONTINUED>                  0               
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0               
<CHANGES>                       0               
<NET-INCOME>                    1304               
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .26               
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .26               
        


</TABLE>
V. B., A CHILD

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2543

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Charles W. Dodson , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pam ela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, WETHERELL

, and MARSTILLER

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 21, 2000 to be assured of consideration. 

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 

*OMB Number:*                     1545-1440.                 

*Regulation Project Number:*                     INTL-64-93.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Conduit Arrangements Regulations.                 

*Description:*                     This document contains regulations relating to when the district director may recharacterize a financing arrangement as a conduit arrangement. Such recharacterization will affect the amount of withholding tax due on financing transactions that are part of the financing arrangement. These regulations will affect withholding agents and foreign investors.                 

*Respondents:*                     Business or other for-profit.                 

*Estimated Number of Recordkeepers:*                     1,000.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper:*                     10 hours.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     10,000 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Lois K. Holland, 

Departmental Reports Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-29774 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 19 October 2004

in Case C-472/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles): Siomab SA v Institut bruxellois pour la gestion de l'environnement (1)

(Environment - Waste - Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on shipments of waste - Competence of the authority of dispatch to verify the classification of the purpose of a shipment (recovery or disposal) and to object to a shipment based on an incorrect classification - Objection procedure)

(2004/C 300/32)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-472/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles (Belgium), made by decision of 20 December 2002, received at the Court on 27 December 2002, in the proceedings between Siomab SA and Institut bruxellois pour la gestion de l'environnement — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 19 October 2004, in which it has ruled:

Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, as amended by Commission Decision 98/368/EC of 18 May 1998 and Commission Decision 1999/816/EC of 24 November 1999, is to be interpreted as meaning that, where a Member State has recourse, under Article 6(8) of that regulation, to the specific procedure whereby the competent authority of dispatch transmits the consignment note for a shipment of waste for recovery, that authority, if it considers it necessary to object to the shipment on the ground that it has been incorrectly classified by the notifier, may not reclassify the shipment on its own initiative and is required to transmit that document to the other competent authorities and the consignee. It is then for that authority to inform the notifier and the other competent authorities concerned of its objection by any appropriate means before the end of the period laid down in Article 7(2) of the Regulation at the latest.

----

(1)OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

----
TINITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. l:22-CR-O58-01-H

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE I,JNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,JILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance witlt 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OXl), the undersigned Disrict Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

,

DatedFebruary 2 ,2023.

JAMES WE HENDRIX

UNITED S ATES DISTRICT ruDGE

IINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DTVISION

ELIJAH JAMES PEREZ

Defendant.

Case 1:22-cr-00058-H-BU Document 35 Filed 02/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 66
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Taitron Components
Incorporated (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2008

                                               /s/ Stewart Wang
                                               ----------------
                                               Stewart Wang
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)

                                               /s/ David Vanderhorst
                                               ---------------------
                                               David Vanderhorst
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               (Principal Financial Officer)
REQUEST FOR REFUND FROM FORFEITURE FUND 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 

TREASURY FORFEITURE FUND 

This form is to be used to request a refund of monies that were previously forfeited 

and deposited to the Treasury Forfeiture Fund. Please e-mail this form, with backup documentation, to the 

Internal Revenue Service Headquarters' mailbox: HQ-W&F@ci.irs.gov 

Seizure #: -

SEACATS# - - -

Date of Forfeiture: DCR Deposit Date: 

Cash Receipt Number : Sale #: - -

Reason for Refund: Petition Restoration Court Order Other 

State Reason Below 

Special Instructions: 

Amounts to be Refunded or Transferred: 

Amount: Amount: 

Pay To: Pay To: 

Address: Address: 

Amount: Amount: 

Pay To: Pay To: 

Address: Address: 

IRS Authorized Representative: 

Name: Field Office: Title: 

Signature & Date: Phone: Fax: 

HQ Signature & Date: 

SEIZURE#: 

FUND: 

FUNDS CENTER: 

 FUNCTIONAL AREA:MA1199999988 

ORDER: ZFX5 

EOAF: Obligator - Signature/Date EOAF: Certifier - Signature/Date 

COST CENTER: 98999000 

MATERIAL GROUP: 

AMOUNT: 

Accomplished by NFC: 

NFC Signature and Date 

Form #7 Revised: September 2020
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18

- 0586 Filed December 18, 2019
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. DMARITHE CULBREATH, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Joel W. Barrows , Judge.

Dmarithe Culbreath appeals the sentences imposed following his guilty pleas in two criminal cases and his st ipulation to probation violations in two other criminal cases. AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender (until withdrawal), and Bradley M. Bender, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Linda J. Hines, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Tabor, P.J. , and Mullins and May, JJ.2

MULLINS , Judge
. Dmarithe Culbreath appeals the sentences imposed following his guilty pleas in two criminal cases and his stipulation to probation viola tions in two other criminal cases. He contends the sentencing court’s consideration of the Iowa Risk Revised assessment (IRR) contained in the presentence

- investigation report (PSI) amounted to an abuse of discretion or violated his due process rights. H e also argues the district court’s consideration of the recommendation contained in the PSI was improper because the judicial district department of correctional services is not statutorily authorized to provide a sentencing recommendation. He alternative ly argues his counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to raise such arguments below. We conclude the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in considering the IRR on its face as contained in the PSI. See State v. Headley , 926 N.W.2d
5 45, 551 (Iowa 2019). As to the due process claims, we find Culbreath failed to preserve error and the record is inadequate for us to consider the claims under an ineffect ive

- assistance

- of

- counsel rubric on direct appeal; we therefore preserve the claims, which Culbreath may raise in a postconviction

- relief action if he so chooses. See id. at 551

– 52. We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s consideration of the sentencing recommendation contained in the PSI. See id. at 552. We affirm without furthe r opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(c) and (e). AFFIRMED.