alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 169/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 169 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6315 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 169

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6315 May 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 169/01 | Communication from the Commission EU Guidance for the progressive resumption of tourism services and for health protocols in hospitality establishments – COVID-19 | 1 |
| 2020/C 169/02 | Communication from the Commission Guidelines on the progressive restoration of transport services and connectivity – COVID-19 | 17 |
| 2020/C 169/03 | Communication from the Commission Towards a phased and coordinated approach for restoring freedom of movement and lifting internal border controls — COVID-19 | 30 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 169/01

Communication from the Commission EU Guidance for the progressive resumption of tourism services and for health protocols in hospitality establishments – COVID-19

1

2020/C 169/02

Communication from the Commission Guidelines on the progressive restoration of transport services and connectivity – COVID-19

17

2020/C 169/03

Communication from the Commission Towards a phased and coordinated approach for restoring freedom of movement and lifting internal border controls — COVID-19

30

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Agenda

June 1, 2016

10:00 Welcome – Michael McRaith, Director of the Federal Insurance 

Office

10:00 – 10:30 Discussion of the Structure of a Robust Private Market for 

Terrorism Risk Insurance and Reinsurance

10:30 – 11:00 Discussion of the Insurance-Linked Securities Market for 

Terrorism Coverage 

 Presentation by John Seo (Fermat Capital)

11:00 – 12:00 Discussion of Private Reinsurance Market for Terrorism Coverage

 Presentation by Kean Driscoll (Validus Reinsurance)

 Presentation by Keith Wolfe (Swiss Re)

 Presentation by Mike Sapnar (Transatlantic Holding)

12:00 – 12:45 Discussion of Methods for Distribution and Placement of Private 

Terrorism Coverage

 Presentation by Jake Clark (Guy Carpenter & Company)

 Presentation by Ed Ryan (Aon Benfield)

12:45 – 1:20 Discussion of Next Steps

1:20 – 1:30 Resolve Outstanding Ethics Questions and New Business

1:30 Adjourn
Order – Solo Page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARQUITA WAFER, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§

 Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-2041-L

SAM’S WEST, INC., doing business as 

SAM’S CLUB,

§

§

§

 Defendant. §

ORDER

The court has been notified by Defendant’s counsel, Mr. Derek S. Davis, that this case has 

settled. The parties are therefore directed to file a stipulation or notice of dismissal, or an agreed 

motion to dismiss with the United States District Clerk’s Office by October 24, 2022. The court 

truly appreciates the efforts of the parties in resolving this case. There appears to be no further 

reason at this time to maintain this case as an open file for statistical purposes, and the court 

determines that it should be, and is hereby, administratively closed. Accordingly, the United 

States District Clerk is instructed to submit JS-6 form to the Administrative Office, thereby 

removing this case from the statistical records. Nothing in this order shall be considered a 

dismissal or disposition of this case, and, should further proceedings in it become necessary or 

desirable, any party may file a motion to reopen the case to initiate such further proceedings, or 

the court may take such action sua sponte.

It is so ordered this 23rd day of September, 2022.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-02041-L Document 5 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 307 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 307

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
        repeal the twenty-fifth amendment to that Constitution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1994

   Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
        repeal the twenty-fifth amendment to that Constitution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be valid only if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of the final passage of this joint 
resolution:

                              ``Article--

    ``The twenty-fifth article of amendment to the Constitution of the 
United States is hereby repealed.''.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-mj-00884-BK Document 5 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 21
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67782-67783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29035]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 65, No. 
217/Wednesday, November 8, 2000.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 14, 
2000.

CHANGE IN MEETING: A majority of the Board Members determined by 
recorded vote that the business of the Board required changing the 
Board Meeting time from Tuesday, November 14, 2000 at 9:30 am to 
Tuesday, November 14, 2000 at 10:00 am at this time and that no earlier 
announcement was possible.

[[Page 67783]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhonda Underwood, (202) 314-6065.

    Dated: November 8, 2000.
Rhonda Underwood,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29035 Filed 11-8-00; 11:51 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
```
# Emergency Procedures

In the event an emergency landing is necessary , Hex has an automatic or selectable “ Return Home ” mode. The operator may set any point as Home in the ground station map display. Home point is automatically recorded before take

- off, or during flight, you can switch the X2 channel between two positions quickly 3 to 5 times to record the current position of the Hex as the new home point. The h ome waypoint can be dragged and dropped to any position or manually input lat itude /long itude

. To prevent erroneous position input, a new home point can only be set when 6 or m ore GPS satellites are found. T h e UAS wi ll fly directly to the emergency location, without hitting any intermediate waypoints. Battery voltage is always displayed on the ground station. In addition, a yellow flashing LED appears at a first pre

- defined low battery level, and a red flashing LED at the second level. This allows the operator to always monitor the battery power remaining. The Go

- Home failsafe mentioned above is triggered at a pre - defined low battery voltage level.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 287 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 287

To designate both the month of August 1994 and the month of August 1995 
            as ``National Slovak American Heritage Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 1993

 Mr. Holden (for himself and Mr. Gekas) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To designate both the month of August 1994 and the month of August 1995 
            as ``National Slovak American Heritage Month''.

Whereas Stefan Parmenius Stitnicky, a Slovak chronologist and author of the poem 
        ``De Navigatione'', came to the New World as a member of Sir Humphrey 
        Gilbert's expedition in 1583;
Whereas Jan Boda, Stefan Mada, and other Slovaks were among the first settlers 
        of Jamestown, Virginia in 1609;
Whereas Slovak immigrants came to North America in great numbers seeking 
        religious, economic, and political freedom and, since the birth of this 
        Nation, have labored diligently for the betterment of America;
Whereas the history of the Slovak people in the United States reflects a hard-
        working and honorable presence for over 200 years and includes service 
        in all of the Nation's wars, including the American Revolution;
Whereas Slovak-Americans, who comprise the second largest Slav ethnic group in 
        America, have distinguished themselves by contributing to the 
        development of the sciences, arts, literature, government, military 
        service, athletics, and education in the United States; and
Whereas in 1993 and 1994, Slovak-Americans celebrate the independence of 
        Slovakia and the centennials of Slovak churches, newspapers, and 
        fraternal organizations in the United States and, in doing so, proudly 
        proclaim their pride in being Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the months of August 1994 
and August 1995 are each designated as ``National Slovak American 
Heritage Month''. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe 
these months with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cv-02074-S   Document 10   Filed 01/10/23    Page 1 of 6   PageID 72

Case 3:22-cv-02074-S   Document 10   Filed 01/10/23    Page 2 of 6   PageID 73

Case 3:22-cv-02074-S   Document 10   Filed 01/10/23    Page 3 of 6   PageID 74

Case 3:22-cv-02074-S   Document 10   Filed 01/10/23    Page 4 of 6   PageID 75

Case 3:22-cv-02074-S   Document 10   Filed 01/10/23    Page 5 of 6   PageID 76

Case 3:22-cv-02074-S   Document 10   Filed 01/10/23    Page 6 of 6   PageID 77
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 315 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 315

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  Designating May 30, 1994, through June 6, 1994, as a ``Time for the 
   National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II''.

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States of America made tremendous 
        sacrifices during World War II to save the world from tyranny and 
        aggression;
Whereas the winds of freedom and democracy sweeping the globe today spring from 
        the principles for which over four hundred thousand Americans gave their 
        lives in World War II;
Whereas World War II and the events that led up to that war must be understood 
        in order that we may better understand our own times, and more fully 
        appreciate the reasons why eternal vigilance against any form of tyranny 
        is so important;
Whereas the World War II era, as reflected in its family life, industry, and 
        entertainment, was a unique period in American history and epitomized 
        our Nation's philosophy of hard work, courage, and tenacity in the face 
        of adversity;
Whereas, between 1991 and 1995, over nine million American veterans of World War 
        II will be holding reunions and conferences and otherwise commemorating 
        the fiftieth anniversary of various events relating to World War II; and
Whereas June 4, 1994, marks the anniversary of the Battle of Midway, and June 6, 
        1994, marks the anniversary of D-Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That May 30, 1994, through 
June 6, 1994, is designated as a ``Time for the National Observance of 
the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe that period with appropriate ceremonies 
and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.






103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 315

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Designating May 30, 1994, through June 6, 1994, as a ``Time for the 
   National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II''.`
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Daril Osias

, * From the 244 th District Court

of Ector County

Trial Court No. C

- 16

- 0966

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 17

- 00 0 67

- CR * March 29 , 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright

, S. C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00255-CR

Eli Blue Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-10-206973, HONORABLE CLIFFORD BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Eli Blue Hernandez pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of a

controlled substance, cocaine, and the district court placed him on deferred-adjudication community

supervision for a period of eight years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to proceed with an

adjudication of guilt, based, in part, on an allegation that Hernandez had committed the subsequent

criminal offense of possession of a controlled substance. Hernandez pleaded true to the allegations 1

in the motion to adjudicate and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He subsequently filed

a pro se notice of appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt. However, the district court has

Hernandez’s appeal of his conviction for the subsequent offense was separately 1

docketed under appellate cause number 03-13-00256-CR. That appeal was dismissed because the

district court had certified that it was a plea-bargain case, the defendant had no right of appeal,

and the defendant had waived the right of appeal. See Hernandez v. State, No. 03-13-00256-CR,

2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 7553 (Tex. App.—Austin June 21, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated

for publication).
now certified that Hernandez has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

____________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed

Filed: March 28, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
EXHIBIT 10.1

MODIFICATION AND/OR EXTENSION AGREEMENT

MRE

|Date:        |  | July 23, 2001                                                                                           
|------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Borrower(s): |  | R-B Rubber Products, Inc,                                                                               
|Lender:      |  | KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                                                                            
|Note:        |  | Dated July 31, 1998, in the principal amount of $1,000,000.00, including any and all amendments thereto.
|Loan #:      |  | 20-121729-1010039501                                                                                    

FOR
VALUE, RECEIVED, Borrower and Lender hereby agree to modify the above-referenced Loan and Promissory Note and/or Loan Agreement as follows:

1.MODIFICATION AND/OR EXTENSION PROVISIONS.



2.CONDITIONS.The modifications and/or extension described above are subject to and conditioned upon
Borrower's full satisfaction of all of the following conditions on or before the datefirststated above, time being of the essence.



3.GENERAL PROVISIONS.Except as modified above, all other provisions of the Promissory Note and any
other documents securing or relating to the Loan (the "Loan Document§") remain in full force and effect. All security given for the Loan and all guarantees of the Loan (as applicable)
shall continue in fill force. Borrower warrants and represents to Lender that it has full right, power and authority to enter into this agreement and to perform all its obligations hereunder, and that
all information and materials submitted to Lender in connection with this modification are accurate and complete. Borrower warrants that no default exists under the Loan Documents. Borrower reaffirms
its obligation to pay the Loan in full and reaffirms the validity and enforceability of the Loan Documents, without set-off, counterclaim or defense.

1

---

ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT, OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER OREGON
LAW.

|LENDER:                                     |  | BORROWER:                                            
|------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                |  | R-B Rubber Products, Inc.                            
|By: /s/ JOHN MARSHJohn Marsh Vice President |  | By: /s/ RONALD L. BOGHRonald L. Bogh President7-23-01

2

---

QuickLinks
#### ORR et al. v. STATE.

No. 21812.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1941.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Feb. 18, 1942.

Rehearing Denied March 11, 1942.

*534R. S. Ragsdale, of BurkBurnett, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This is a second appeal from a judgment of bond forfeiture, the former being reported in 139 Tex.Cr.R. 436, 141 S.W.2d 597.

The voluminous record in this case contains no bills of exception and no assignments of error. We have examined the procedure and confess our inability to understand the question which appellants have in mind. No brief has been furnished the court in behalf of the appeal, and we are unable from an examination of the record to find any fundamental error.

Further, the appeal is governed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, Art. 866, C.C.P., and is, therefore, controlled by Rule 415, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which has not been complied with. This court has always dismissed the appeal in such cases where no brief has been filed and no showing made to excuse the failure. Wade et al. v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 49, 43 S.W.2d 938 and authorities there cited.

The State’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Only after their motion to reinstate the appeal had been submitted in this court did appellants file a brief as is required under the rules mentioned in the original opinion. The only error assigned or discussed therein is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury to return a verdict for the State. No bills of exception accompany the record.

Notwithstanding we are not required to do so, we have examined the facts to determine if there was sufficient evidence introduced to constitute a valid defense such as would nullify the forfeiture of the bond. We have found none.

The motion to reinstate the appeal is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The opinion disposing of the appeal was delivered on February 18, 1942. A motion for rehearing reached the Clerk of this court on March 7th, 1942. The post mark on the envelope shows it was not posted in the mail for transmission until March 6, 1942. The 15 days within which a motion for rehearing could be filed expired on March 5th.

Not having been filed in time the motion may not be considered. See Fitts v. State, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 146, 264 S.W. 1006; Smith v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 273, 75 S.W.2d 449.
### STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS NO. 

### 2022 KW 0325
PHILIPPE VEETERS MARCH 30, 2022
In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for 

### supervisory writs,

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### DC -19-07235. BEFORE: MCDONALD, McCLENDON, AND WELCH, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. 

## Thedistrict court erred in finding that La. R. S. 

### 14:43.4 defines the term " genitals." Instead, that statute merely 

### identifies what constitutes the crime of female genital mutilation. 

## Accordingly, the district court' s ruling 

### relying upon La. R.S. 

### 14: 43.4 to define " genitals" 

### is reversed. JMM PMC JEW



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# V I

# v

# pir - I DEPUTY CLERK O COURT

FOR THE URT