alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

Case 4:22-cv-00772-O Document 1-11 Filed 08/29/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 138
MACKIEWOLFZIENTZ & MANN, P.C. 

ATTORNEYS ATLAW

PHONE ( 214) 635-2650 FAX (214) 635-2686

PARKWAY OFFICE CENTER, SUITE 900 UNION PLAZA

14160DALLAS PARKWAY 124WESTCAPITOL, SUITE 1560

DALLAS, TEXAS 75254 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201

PLEASE RESPOND TODALLAS OFFICE

August 30, 2021

VIAFIRSTCLASS MAIL

CHRISTINE GROOMS

801ALADRIVE

WHITE SETTLEMENT, TX76108

RE: LoanNo: 

Current Borrower(s): CHRISTINE GROOMS

Property Address: 801ALADRIVE, WHITE SETTLEMENT, TX76108

MWZM No.: 18-000042-210-2

DearCHRISTINE GROOMS: 

According tothefigures provided tousbyourclient, thepayoff figures yourequested inconnection withtheabovereferenced loanareasfollows: 

Unpaid Principal Balance $ 136,746.44

Interest $ 88.23

Current Attorney Fees $ 2,429.63

Corporate Advances $- 89,000.00

Recording Fees $ 31.26

TitleCosts $ 400.00

Servicing FeeforSeptember $ 35.00

MIP $ 28.10

Grand Total $ 50,758.66

Theforegoing figures aregoodthrough September 15, 2021. These figures aresubject tofinalverification upon

receipt offundsbyReverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. which reserves therighttoadjust these figures andrefuse any

fundswhich areinsufficient topaytheloaninfullforanyreason including, butnotlimited toanerrorincalculation

ofthepayoff amount, previously dishonored check ormoney orderoradditional disbursements made byReverse

Mortgage Solutions, Inc. between thedateofthispayoff statement andthereceipt offunds. Payment mustbemade

payable toReverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. intheformofacashiers check, certified check ormoney orders and

should besenttoouroffice. 

Thisquoteincludes allestimated andfuture feesnecessary topayoffthisloan. Anyoverages willberefunded

toyouwithin 20business days. 

Ifyouhaveanyquestions, please donothesitate tocontact ouroffice. 

Pursuant totheFederal FairDebtCollection Practices Act, weadvise youthatthisfirmisa

debtcollector attempting tocollect theindebtedness referred tointheabove paragraphs and

anyinformation weobtain fromyouwillbeusedforthatpurpose. 

Page1of2

Case 4:22-cv-00772-O Document 1-11 Filed 08/29/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 139
Sincerely, 

Mackie WolfZientz & Mann, P.C. 

Page2of2

Case 4:22-cv-00772-O Document 1-11 Filed 08/29/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 140
# C_2005281EN.01002102.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 2005 — Citicorp v OHIM

(Case T-320/03) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Word mark LIVE RICHLY - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Right to be heard - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94)

(2005/C 281/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Citicorp (New York, United States) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and A. Pohlmann, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen, P. Bullock and A. von Mühlendahl, Agents)

Defendant(s):

Application for

annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 June 2003 (Case R 85/2002-3), concerning an application to register the word mark LIVE RICHLY as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the application;

| 2) | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs, in addition to one half of the costs incurred by the defendant; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs, in addition to one half of the costs incurred by the defendant;

| 3) | Orders the defendant to bear one half of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the defendant to bear one half of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275, 15.11.2003.

1

---
#### INLAND REFINING CO. v. ROBINSON.

No. A-3965.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 1, 1953.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 1953.

*844Ed Roy Simmons, Teague, for petitioner.

Lawrence & Lawrence, Tyler, for respondent.

CULVER, Justice.

 This case is before us both as to venue and on the merits. Trial was had in the District Court of Anderson County (a court having continuous terms.) Respondent, Robinson, filed a plea of privilege which was heard and overruled on November 13, 1951, during the July term of the court. The case was tried on its merits February 28, 1952, during the December term and judgment was rendered for petitioner against respondent in the amount prayed for. No appeal from the order overruling the plea of privilege was taken for more than thirty days after the same was entered. The order, therefore, became final and the court thereafter was without jurisdiction to set it aside except by bill of review. R.C.P. rule 330; Wichita Falls & S. R. Co. v. McDonald, 141 Tex. 555, 174 S.W.2d 951. The Court of Civil Appeals erred, therefore, in sustaining the plea and ordering the transfer of the case. 253 *S.W.2d*80.

The petitioner alleged that it sold to respondent products at various times with the understanding and agreement that after delivering the products' and copies of the manifest on the same, drafts would be drawn on respondent for the amount due which would be payable on demand. On failure of respondent to honor these drafts petitioner brings this suit on the theory that under these circumstances the respondent had become bound and obligated to pay the drafts as drawn. The only witness was the general manager of petitioner company, who identified the drafts and testified that they were returned by the bank unpaid. The only testimony given by him as to the agreement on the draft ist

> “Q. Did Mr. Robinson specifically instruct you. to draw draft on him in payment of these products ? A. That is what he did. That is the way we always did.”

 We think this amounted to little more than a- promise to pay. The manifests or invoices were not introduced in evidence nor was there any proof showing what products were delivered or their value. For a draft to become a negotiable instrument it must have been accepted in writing. Section 127, Negotiable Instruments Act, Article 5940, Vernon’s Ann. Civil Statutes; 8' Am.Jur., Sections. 870, -871. The proof, therefore, failed to support the judgment of the trial court.'

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, 253 S.W.2d 80, is reversed in so far as its ruling on the plea of privilege is concerned and affirmed as to the merits of thé case. The cause is therefore remanded to the District Court of Anderson County, Texas, for trial on its merits.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 239 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 239

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 15 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 2, 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the President to proclaim September 1994 as ``Classical 
                             Music Month''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is hereby 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating September 
1994 as ``Classical Music Month'' and calling upon the people of the 
United States to observe such a month with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    265,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               700,000
<PP&E>                                         326,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,531,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          446,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     253,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,531,000
<SALES>                                        319,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               319,000
<CGS>                                          128,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  276,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 7/9/2014 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Joe Bry son , EPA SUBJECT: 7/9 /201 4 , APPA Meeting Regarding Proposed C lean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants **SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendee listed below on 7/9/2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014 . **ATTENDEES** Joe Bry son, CPPD OAP OAR EPA Tanzina I slam, APPA
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 320

Designating April 11, 1994, as ‘‘Persian Gulf War Veteran Recognition Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1994

Mr. BLUTE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating April 11, 1994, as ‘‘Persian Gulf War Veteran

Recognition Day’’.

Whereas, on August 2, 1990, the Government of Iraq

launched an unprovoked assault on, and subsequently occupied the territory of, Kuwait;

Whereas Iraq’s disrespect for the legitimate boundaries of a

sovereign nation and its demonstrated willingness to use

weapons of mass destruction against its neighbors posed

a serious threat to world peace;

Whereas vigorous diplomatic efforts by the international community failed to persuade Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait
2

•HJ 320 IH

and allow the restoration of Kuwait’s legitimate government;

Whereas the United Nations Security Council repeatedly affirmed Kuwait’s right to defend itself against Iraq’s

armed assaults, and adopted Resolution 678 authorizing

members of the United Nations to use all means necessary after January 15, 1991, to assist Kuwait in recapturing its independence;

Whereas, on January 16, 1991, a coalition of United States

and allied forces embarked on Operation Desert Storm,

a mission to liberate Kuwait from the control of Iraq;

Whereas the men and women of the United States Armed

Forces risked their lives to defend Kuwait and the Kuwaiti people, and successfully fought to liberate Kuwait;

and

Whereas, on April 11, 1991, the United Nations Security

Council declared a formal cease-fire ending the Persian

Gulf War: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That April 11, 1994, is designated as ‘‘Persian Gulf War

4 Veteran Recognition Day’’, and the President is author5 ized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the

6 people of the United States to observe the day with appro7 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Ineich, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of arson in the third degree (Penal Law § 150.10) for setting fire to a truck which was parked outside a bar he frequented in Syracuse. He contends on appeal that the court’s instructions to the jury on circumstantial evidence were erroneous. Defendant concedes that no objections were taken to the court’s charge and, thus, this issue has not been properly preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to exercise our discretion to reach this issue in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—arson, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 401 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res. 401

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  Designating the months of March 1995 and March 1996 as ``Irish-
American Heritage Month''.

Whereas 150 years ago, the blight that struck Ireland's potato crop 
  (``the single root that changed the history of the world''), known as 
  the Great Famine, caused 2,000,000 of Ireland's population to 
  emigrate, mostly to America's shores;
Whereas in 1847 alone, 25,000 Irish immigrants arrived in Boston;
Whereas by 1851, the end of the famine exodus, 1,712 emigrant ships had 
  sailed up the Narrows into New York harbor;
Whereas during the ``Great Hunger'' (1845-1851) more people left 
  Ireland than had emigrated in the previous 250 years;
Whereas within a few years of their arrival in the United States, these 
  Irish immigrants took jobs as laborers, built railroads, canals, and 
  schools, dedicated themselves to help build this Nation, and this 
  same legacy remains a part of today's American mainstream;
Whereas James Smith, George Taylor, Matthew Thornton, and Charles 
  Thomson, 4 of the individuals who signed the Declaration of 
  Independence, were Irish born and 9 other signers were of Irish 
  ancestry;
Whereas Irish-born James Hoban designed and supervised the building of 
  the White House and its restoration after it was burned in 1814;
Whereas more than 200 Irish-Americans have been awarded the 
  Congressional Medal of Honor;
Whereas 19 Presidents of the United States proudly claim Irish 
  heritage, included among them, the first President, George 
  Washington;
Whereas John W. O'Beirne, Founder of the American Foundation for Irish 
  Heritage, first requested in 1990 that Congress designate March as 
  ``Irish-American Heritage Month''; and
Whereas the 44,000,000 Americans of Irish ancestry, like their 
  forebears, continue to enrich all aspects of life in the United 
  States, in science, education, art, agriculture, business, industry, 
  literature, music, athletics, military and governmental service: Now, 
  therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the months of March 1995 
and March 1996 are designated as ``Irish-American Heritage Month''. The 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe these months with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
Exhibit 10.25


 





AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment To Executive Employment Agreement
(“Amendment”), dated June 30, 2015, hereby amends the Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated the July 1, 2013 between Reprints Desk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Research Solutions,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Research Solutions”), and Scott Ahlberg (“Executive”), an individual.


 


WHEREAS, the parties
have complied with the terms of the Agreement until the date hereof; and


 


WHEREAS, Reprints Desk
and Executive wish to amend the terms of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for
the mutual promises and other consideration described herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	Section 1(d) Term is amended as follows:



 





Term. The term of employment of Executive by
the Company pursuant to this Employment Agreement shall be for the period commencing on the Commencement Date and ending on June
30, 2017, or such earlier date that Employee’s employment is terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Employment
Agreement.


 


		2.	Section 2(a) Base Salary is amended as follows:



 


Base Salary. In consideration of the services
to be rendered under this Agreement, the Company shall pay Executive a salary at the rate of Two Hundred and Four Thousand Nine
Hundred and Thirty Dollars ($204,930) per year (“Base Salary”). The Base Salary shall be paid in accordance
with the Company’s regularly established payroll practice. Executive’s Base Salary will be reviewed from time to time
in accordance with the established procedures of the Company for adjusting salaries for similarly situated employees and may be
adjusted in the sole discretion of the Company.


 


Except as expressly amended or modified
herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved and shall remain in full force and
effect. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall govern.


 


This Amendment and all acts and transactions
pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law.


 


This Amendment may be executed and delivered
by facsimile signature and in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 





REPRINTS DESK, INC.:


 










	By:  ___________________________		Name and Title: Peter Derycz, CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	RESEARCH SOLUTIONS, INC.: 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  ___________________________		Name and Title: Peter Derycz, CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE:	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  ___________________________		Name: ______________________
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Address: ________________________________________________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 110 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 27 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 
   to conduct appropriate programs and activities to acknowledge the 
status of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ``World Capital 
                of Aerobatics'', and for other purposes.

Whereas the International Aerobatic Club, which was founded on February 6, 1970, 
        held its first championships in August 1970 in the county of Fond du 
        Lac, Wisconsin;
Whereas in 1992 the International Aerobatic Club had 5,342 members throughout 
        the world, representatives of which gathered in Fond du Lac to compete 
        in the 23d Annual Aerobatic Championships during the period of August 9-
        14, 1992;
Whereas in 1992 the Experimental Aircraft Association and the Board of Directors 
        of the International Aerobatic Club named Fond du Lac as the ``World 
        Capital of Aerobatics'';
Whereas participants and spectators drawn to the aerobatic championships in Fond 
        du Lac stimulate the economic well-being of the community and provide a 
        spectator event of international significance; and
Whereas Congress declares that the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, is the 
        ``World Capital of Aerobatics'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Administrator of the 
Federal Aviation Administration may conduct appropriate programs and 
activities at the Fond du Lac County Airport to acknowledge the status 
of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ``World Capital of 
Aerobatics'', and that the airport may display signs notifying the 
public of such status.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```