alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Promulgation: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation for Telephone Call on September 16, 2010 with DuPont RepresentativeFluorinated Gas Production Re-Proposal RuleDates: September 16, 2010 Staff Contact Information (Name, email, phone #): Deborah Ottinger, EPA, 202-343-9149, Ottinger.deborah@epa.gov; Karen Schaffner, RTI, ksschaffner@rti.org; Carrie Ric

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible):John Dege, Robert Giraud, Paul Jann, Suhas Mahuli, Brad Martin, Patricia McGee, Ed Robinson, DuPont 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.): The purpose of the call was to discuss their public comments regarding emission estimation techniques available to calcula

emissions along with other concerns regarding the reporting rule. DuPont representatives noted the following: 

• With respect to destruction devices, they are not looking at PICs, but this may have been done on the pilot-scale tes

much work on PICs, particularly Dr. Wing Tsang. University of Dayton has also done much work on the thermal s

that CF4 is difficult to destroy and tends to form as a PIC.] In general, get good bond breakage for C-F bond at the 

temperatures. Under the temperature and residence time of their destruction device, it achieves C-F bond breaks. T

in concentrations of ppm at the outlet and not in the percent level. If PIC testing must be done, EPA should allow l

be done, and also conduct testing on small-scale or bench-scale destruction devices because these approach are muinformation from models and literature data. The costs are high for measuring compounds down to trace concentra

versus 7 percent are significantly different; often will use simulation modeling to determine the whether the concen

range or the percent range. 

• A mass balance approach based on total Fluorine seems reasonable, however the facility will have to think through 

The total Fluorine approach allows its use on transformation processes. The total Fluorine content could be determmethod. Once you get total Fluorine then must figure out how to allocate to product compounds, reactant compoun

compounds. This approach seems to include a few more steps than the re-proposed mass balance method. In some Fluorine balance may be more simple, however they will need to work through an example by applying it to a procreasonable. In other example applications of the mass balance approach, the error calculation showed high error, a

limits are too tight. A mass balance on an element is likely good, and option to base on another element besides Fl

appropriate. Perhaps having both mass balance approaches as available options would be good. [EPA asked abouthat could be used for total fluorine analysis.] 
• The schedule for subpart L is tight. Subpart OO was relatively simple compared to subpart L requirements. Facili

for the full first year. 

Written Comments Provided? No. Did they also submit to Docket? No. Date sent to EPA- CCD None
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1998
<CASH>                                          10,399
<SECURITIES>                                       121
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,518
<INVENTORY>                                     15,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,456
<PP&E>                                         146,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,966
<BONDS>                                         54,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                           272
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,973
<SALES>                                         63,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,208
<CGS>                                           90,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.37)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Andean Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lance Larson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By/s/Lance Larson



Lance Larson

President, Chief Executive Officer





Date:  May 16, 2005
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 217

To authorize the President to proclaim September 1993 as ‘‘Classical Music

Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1993

Mr. YATES introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the President to proclaim September 1993 as

‘‘Classical Music Month’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President is hereby authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation designating September 1993 as

5 ‘‘Classical Music Month’’ and calling upon the people of

6 the United States to observe such a month with appro7 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2015

Nos. 04-14-00106-CR & 04-14-00432-CR

EX PARTE Otto Ray KIETZMAN,

From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013W0631

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In both Appeal No. 04-14-00432-CR and Appeal No. 04-14-00106-CR, Otto Ray 

Kietzman has filed a pro se motion for access to a supplemental clerk’s record filed on December 

16, 2014, and a motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing.

Furthermore, we GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the clerk of this court to mail 

appellant a paper copy of the supplemental clerk’s record filed December 16, 2014. Further, we 

GRANT appellant motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 49.8. The deadline for appellant filing a motion for rehearing is February 27, 2015.

With regard to Appeal No. 04-14-00106-CR, mandate issued in this appeal on June 2, 

2014. Therefore, we DENY his motions in that appeal.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 34 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.34
                                           Agreed to May 4, 1993        
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas there is significant widespread support in the international 
  community for the view that for scientific, ecological, and 
  educational reasons, whales should no longer be hunted for profit;
Whereas there is concern that efforts will be made at the 1993 Annual 
  Meeting of the International Whaling Commission to overturn the 
  Commission's existing moratorium on commercial whaling of large 
  whales;
Whereas there are species of small cetaceans that are currently subject 
  to direct commercial harvest;
Whereas there are unique regions of the world's seas which serve as 
  important feeding grounds for many species of whales, and where the 
  impacts of environmental threats are unknown: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
        (1) the United States policy should promote the conservation and 
    protection of whale, dolphin, and porpoise populations;
        (2) the United States should remain opposed to any resumption of 
    commercial whaling, and should work toward a moratorium on the 
    direct commercial harvest of dolphins and porpoises;
        (3) the United States should work to strengthen the 
    International Whaling Commission by reaffirming its competence to 
    regulate direct commercial harvest of small cetaceans and should 
    encourage the Commission to consider the expertise of its Scientific 
    Committee;
        (4) the United States should support the establishment of 
    appropriate international sanctuaries where whaling is prohibited; 
    and
        (5) in promoting the conservation and protection of the world's 
    whale populations, the United States should make the fullest use of 
    diplomatic channels, appropriate domestic and international law, and 
    all other available means.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter -239.13

RECOMMENDED

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT CHANGE** AMOUNT MONEY

2-year note 4/1 40.00 0.00

5-year note 4/1 41.00 0.00

7-year note 4/1 32.00 0.00 71.46 41.54

3-year Note 4/15 38.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 4/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 4/15 16.00 0.00 77.76 0.24

5-year TIPS 4/30 17.00 1.00

2-year note 4/30 40.00 0.00

2-year FRN 4/30 20.00 0.00

5-year note 4/30 41.00 0.00

7-year note 4/30 32.00 0.00 107.21 42.79

3-year Note 5/15 38.00 0.00

10-year Note 5/15 27.00 0.00

30-year Bond 5/15 19.00 0.00 55.36 28.64

10-year TIPS (r) 5/31 11.00 0.00

2-year note 5/31 40.00 0.00

5-year note 5/31 41.00 0.00

2-year FRN (r) 5/31 18.00 0.00

7-year note 5/31 32.00 0.00 73.08 68.92

3-year Note 6/17 38.00 0.00

10-year Note (r) 6/17 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond (r) 6/17 16.00 0.00 24.00 54.00

5-year TIPS (r) 6/28 15.00 1.00

2-year FRN (r) 6/28 18.00 0.00 0.00 33.00

678.00 408.87 269.13

Recommendations are italicized. r = Reopening NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 30

actually issue debt in the future.

** Change is relative to the prior issuance of the relevant instrument. For example, a reopening is compared to the prior

reopening of that instrument tenor and type.

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR CALENDAR 2ND QUARTER 2019*

* This financing table reflects TBAC recommendations based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 34

   Calling for a continued United States policy of opposition to the 
resumption of commercial whaling, and otherwise expressing the sense of 
  the Congress with respect to conserving and protecting the world's 
               whale, dolphin, and porpoise populations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

    Mr. Studds (for himself and Mr. Saxton) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on 
           Foreign Affairs and Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Calling for a continued United States policy of opposition to the 
resumption of commercial whaling, and otherwise expressing the sense of 
  the Congress with respect to conserving and protecting the world's 
               whale, dolphin, and porpoise populations.

Whereas there is significant widespread support in the international community 
        for the view that for scientific, ecological, and educational reasons, 
        whales should no longer be hunted for profit;
Whereas many of the more than sixty species of whales and dolphins are currently 
        subject to direct commercial harvest, and there is concern that efforts 
        will be made at the 1993 annual meeting of the International Whaling 
        Commission to overturn the Commission's existing moratorium on 
        commercial whaling of large whales; and
Whereas there are unique regions of the world's seas which serve as important 
        feeding grounds for many species of whales, and where the impacts of 
        environmental threats are unknown: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States should remain opposed to any 
        resumption of commercial whaling, and should work toward a 
        moratorium on the direct commercial harvest of dolphins and 
        porpoises;
            (2) the United States should support the establishment of 
        appropriate international sanctuaries where whaling is 
        prohibited; and
            (3) in promoting the conservation and protection of the 
        world's whale populations, the United States should make the 
        fullest use of diplomatic channels, appropriate domestic and 
        international law, and all other available means.

                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte SANCHEZ.

No. 23065.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 31, 1945.

Nago L. Alaniz, of San Diego, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from the refusal of District Judge to grant bail to appellant on a charge of murder filed against him in the Justice Court of Jim Wells County.

The only witness testifying in the case and whose evidence appears in the record describes a wanton murder with no indication of ,any mitigating circumstances. We have no support for a finding that the order of the District Judge, refusing bail, is' not warranted.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Alexander, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered May 30, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the second degree and, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 3 Vi to 7 years and 4 to 8 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s expanded no-adverse-inference charge is unpreserved for review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Autry, 75*NY2d 836). We find no reason to review in the interest of justice *(see, People v Autry, supra).*In any event, the challenged charge did not impermissibly comment on any failure of a defendant to offer sworn testimony *(compare, People v McLucas,*15 NY2d 167, 171) and was consistent with CPL 300.10 (2) and we decline to reverse for minor expansion beyond the statutory language *(People v Diggs,*151 AD2d 359, 362). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be meritless. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Milonas, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 9/29/14

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Lora Strine, EPA

SUBJECT: 8/1/14, ECOS Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on 8/1/14 to discuss the 

proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Janet McCabe, AAA OAR EPA

Mark Rupp, DAA, OCIR, EPA

Please see attached list of state participants.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LANCHESTER FREEMAN, §

#339862, §

PETITIONER, §

§

V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:22-CV-1620-K-BK

§

BRYAN COLLIER, ET AL., §

RESPONDENT. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The court reviewed the 

proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the 

court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED,

Signed November 8th, 2022.

____________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01620-K-BK Document 6 Filed 11/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

P1aintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-084-02-H

KINNSLEY CHARLIEANN MATHEWS,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIM UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Deflendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the united states Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been flled within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(b)(l), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that rhe Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedDecemb 'r L ,zOZZ.

JAMES SLEY NDRIX

UNITE STATES DISTRICT ruDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00084-H-BQ Document 45 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 88
# Appendix A

&F_&A

# Appendix B

&F_&A
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KALAN GOLD
CORPORATION UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE
RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          28,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  246,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               730,425
<PP&E>                                       1,632,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                 539,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,362,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          337,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           973
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,817,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,362,948
<SALES>                                            789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   789
<CGS>                                              632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (260,766)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (260,766)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (237,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Order Resetting Trial – Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § Criminal No: 3:22-CR-00228-L

§

DEMONTRE ANTWON HACKWORTH §

ORDER RESETTING TRIAL

Before the court is Defendant Demontre Antwon Hackworth’s Unopposed Motion for 

Continuance of Trial and Pretrial Deadlines (Doc. 20), filed July 5, 2022. Upon consideration of 

the motion and the applicable law, and in accordance with the findings set forth below, the court 

determines that the motion should be and is hereby granted.

Defendant Hackworth requests at least a 90-day continuance because defense counsel 

needs additional time to review discovery and discuss the same with Defendant in order to 

effectively represent him. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), the court 

finds that the ends of justice served by granting this motion for continuance outweigh the best 

interest of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial. In this regard, the court has considered 

factors indicating that its failure to grant this motion would deny counsel for Defendant reasonable 

time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 

Therefore, any period of delay resulting from the court’s granting the motion for continuance shall 

be excluded in computing the time within which the trial of this cause must commence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3161.

Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 21 Filed 07/08/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 69
Order Resetting Trial – Page 2

Accordingly, the current trial setting of August 22, 2022 is hereby vacated, and this case 

is reset for trial on Tuesday, February 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m.

The following revised scheduling order is issued for this case:

Motion Deadline: November 4, 2022, at 4:00 p.m.

Motion Response Deadline: November 18, 2022, at 4:00 p.m.

Replies: No replies to any motion may be filed without leave of court.

Trial Setting: Tuesday, February 7, 2023, at 9:00 a.m.

The court’s response-to-motion deadline is the date listed only if the motion is filed on the 

motion deadline; otherwise, the response should be filed in accordance with the court’s Local 

Rules of Criminal Procedure.

All other portions of the court’s original Criminal Trial Scheduling Order remain in effect.

It is so ordered this 8th day of July, 2022.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 21 Filed 07/08/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 70