alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 402I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 402I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 645 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 402I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 645 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2021/C 402 I/01 | Opinion No 2/2021 concerning the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014 in order to enhance predictability for Member States and to clarify procedures for dispute resolution when making available the traditional, VAT and GNI based own resources (COM(2021) 327 final of 25 June 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2021/C 402 I/01

Opinion No 2/2021 concerning the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014 in order to enhance predictability for Member States and to clarify procedures for dispute resolution when making available the traditional, VAT and GNI based own resources (COM(2021) 327 final of 25 June 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

| 5.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 402/1

---

Opinion No 2/2021

concerning the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014 in order to enhance predictability for Member States and to clarify procedures for dispute resolution when making available the traditional, VAT and GNI based own resources (COM(2021) 327 final of 25 June 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE))

(2021/C 402 I/01)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that opinion No 2/2021 concerning the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014 in order to enhance predictability for Member States and to clarify procedures for dispute resolution when making available the traditional, VAT and GNI based own resources (COM(2021) 327 final of 25 June 2021, 2021/0161 (NLE)) is published on 5 October 2021.

The opinion can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website from 17:00 on 5 October 2021:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=59435

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
    GOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
    REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS
    QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             2,251
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,054,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    9,025,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15,722,404
<PP&E>                                         5,302,719
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,392,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                20,331,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,298,535
<BONDS>                                          225,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       7,441,973
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,300,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  20,331,586
<SALES>                                       11,886,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              11,886,804
<CGS>                                          8,676,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 12,320,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                40,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (454,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (174,914)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (297,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (279,434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.08)

        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENDY YAKARELY CRUZ

- HERRERA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 23

- 258

Agency No.

A201

- 400

- 703

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12, 2023 **

Before: CANBY, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges

.

Wendy Yakarely Cruz

- Herrera , a native and citizen of Nicaragua , petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision deeming her applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 26 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 23

- 258

Torture (“CAT”) abandoned

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion a decision to deem an application abandoned.

Gonzalez

- Veliz v. Garland , 996 F.3d 942, 94 8 (9th Cir. 2021)

. We review de novo

claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. Simeonov v.

Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in finding Cruz

- Herrera abandoned

her application s for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection by

failing to complete the biometrics requirement before the deadline imposed by the

IJ. See 8 C.F.R. § 1 208.10 (“ Failure to comply with processing requirements for

biometrics

... within the time allow ed will result in dismissal of the application,

unless the applicant demonstrates that such failure was the result of good cause. ”);

Gonzalez

- Veliz , 996 F.3d at 948 (no abuse of discretion in finding application

abandoned for failure to provide timely biom etrics ).

Cruz

- Herrera’s claim s the agency violated due process by conducting her

hearing without counsel and not granting additional time to find new counsel fail

because she has not shown error where the record indicates she was represented by

counsel at the hearing and did not request a continuance

. See Padilla

- Martinez v.

Holder , 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014) (“To prevail on a due

- process claim, a

petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of rights and prejudice.”).3 23

- 258

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### ROSS v. STATE.

No. 26139.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The jury found appellant guilty under each of the four counts of the information charging him with the offense of negligent homicide in the second degree in the first two counts and aggravated assault in the others. A fine of $150 was assessed under each count and judgment for the cumulated fine of $600 was entered.

The record contains no notice of appeal from this judgment, in the absence of which we are without jurisdiction to enter any order except a dismissal of the appeal.

,The appeal is dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0390

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JASON AARON CARRYWATER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 12, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 5 2021

03/05/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0390
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00017-CR

Yordanys Avila-Trujillo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY 

NO. CR-17-0881, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

PER CURIAM

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on March 4, 

2019. On March 6, 2019, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to 

appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and 

submit a status report regarding this appeal by March 26, 2019. Further, the notice advised 

appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal 

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). To date, neither appellant nor his counsel 

has filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has 

not been filed.

However, we note that the district clerk’s information sheet filed with the notice 

of appeal indicates that appellant had appointed counsel at trial. Appellant’s court-appointed 
2

counsel filed the notice of appeal and is the designated counsel on appeal. Although the trialcourt clerk has notified us that no affidavit of indigence has been filed in appellant’s case, it 

appears that appellant was determined indigent at some point, and the trial court appointed 

counsel.

Accordingly, the appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court 

shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether 

the appellant is indigent, and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned this appeal. The court shall 

make appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 37.3(a)(2) (appellate court 

must make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and preserve parties’ rights when 

record has not been timely filed); id. R. 35.3(c) (appellate court must allow record to be filed late 

when delay is not appellant’s fault). If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who 

will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. See id. R. 38.8(4) (appellate court may act 

appropriately to ensure appellant’s rights are protected when appellant is represented by 

counsel). Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the 

appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to 

be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than June 17, 2019.

It is so ordered May 16, 2019.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Abated and Remanded

Filed: May 16, 2019

Do Not Publish
Opinion filed Februar y 2 6, 2009



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

___________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 00 02 -CV

____ ____ __ KEITH R US SELL JUD D, Ap pellant

V. KA REN Y. CO REY -STE ELE, Ap pellee On App eal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Ector C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC 2-20,222

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Keith Russell J udd failed to c omply with T EX . R. A PP . P. 20.1 when he filed his pro se notice of appe al. J udd has filed numer ous motions wit h this court attempting t o proce ed with hi s appea l without pay ing c osts. None of these motions comply with Rule 20.1, and ea ch ar e over ruled. J udd has filed in this court multiple responses a nd briefs suppor

ti n g t h i s ap p eal. He c on tin ue s to c ha lle nge th e 19 97 -9 8 p ro c e e din g s h e ini tiate d c on c e rn inghis re la tio ns hip wi th Ka re n Y
. C o r e y - S t e e l e . N o n e o f h i s c o n t e n t i o n s c o mp l y

w i t h t h e r e qu i r e m e n t s o f R u l e 2 0
. 1
. A ll of his contentions are overr uled.2

J u d d w a s d ir e c te d to f

il e in th is c o u rt th e c le r

k ’ s r e c o r d an d th e r e qu is it e f il in g f ee on or be fo re F e br

ua ry 13 , 2 00 9. Judd

ha s f a ile d to fi le e ith e r. Th e c le rk of the tr ia l c ourt

ha s in fo rm e d th is court in writing that J udd has failed to make the nece ssary arr ang ements t o pay for the cler k’s re cord. There fore , failure to file the cle rk’s re cord is due to Judd’s actions. T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). The a ppeal is dismissed.
PER C URI AM
Fe bruar y 26, 2009 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S t r an g e , J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-071-Y 

 § 

JOSEJUAN RANGEL (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED September 15, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00071-Y Document 32 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 049

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
# QSBL 063022

# QSBL 033122

# QSBL 123121

# QSBL 093021

# QSBL 063021

# QSBL 033121

# QSBL 123120

# QSBL 093020

# QSBL 063020

# QSBL 033120

# QSBL 123119

# QSBL 093019

# QSBL 063019

# QSBL 033119

# QSBL 123118

# QSBL 093018

# QSBL 063018

# QSBL 033118

# QSBL 123117

# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dale E. Parker, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. for its fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2015; and

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: December 22, 2015

| |                                                              | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| | /s/ Dale E. Parker                                           | 
| | Name: Dale E. Parker                                         | 
| | Title: Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer
Community Development 

Financial Institutions Fund FY 

2023 President's Budget 

Request: Summary of Capital 

Investments

$000,000s

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Percent Agency External Agency External Total

Capital Investments Total 5.434 - 3.145 - 8.579 4.853 - 3.715 - 8.568 3.788 - 3.372 - 7.160 -16% 3.788 - 3.372 - 7.160 

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 5.434 - 3.145 - 8.579 4.853 - 3.715 - 8.568 3.788 - 3.372 - 7.160 -16% 3.788 - 3.372 - 7.160 

Standard/Non-Standard IT sub-total

IT Total 5.434 - 3.145 - 8.579 4.853 - 3.715 - 8.568 3.788 - 3.372 - 7.160 -16% 3.788 - 3.372 - 7.160 

non-IT Total

CDFI Major IT Investments

CDFI non-Major IT Investments

Award Management Information System 5.434 - 3.115 - 8.549 4.853 - 3.685 - 8.538 3.788 - 3.342 - 7.130 -17% 3.788 - 3.342 - 7.130 

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

5.434 - 3.115 - 8.549 4.853 - 3.685 - 8.538 3.788 - 3.342 - 7.130 -17% 3.788 - 3.342 - 7.130 

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund 

Public Website

- - 0.030 - 0.030 - - 0.030 - 0.030 - - 0.030 - 0.030 0% - - 0.030 - 0.030 

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

- - 0.030 - 0.030 - - 0.030 - 0.030 - - 0.030 - 0.030 0% - - 0.030 - 0.030 

FY 2021 Actuals FY 2022 Estimated Obligations FY 2023 Estimated Obligations FY 2023 President's Budget

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

Change 

from CY 

to BY DME O&M Total

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Summary of Capital Investments Page 1 of 1 3/28/2022
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2015-2, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning onMarch 1, 2018and ending onFebruary 28, 2019and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 23rd day of May, 2019 .





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Enrique Mayor-Mora


Enrique Mayor-Mora


Vice President and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
                             CRA MANAGED CARE, INC.
            Calculation of Shares Used in Determining Earnings Per Share
           for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 1995 and 1996
                                        

                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                     SEPTEMBER 30,          SEPTEMBER 30,
                                 ---------------------   ---------------------
                                    1995       1996        1995        1996
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------   --------- 
Weighted average number of
  shares of common stock
  outstanding during 
  the period                     7,216,000   8,896,000   6,098,000   8,074,000 

Common stock equivalents, 
  under the treasury stock
  method                           135,000     188,000     125,000     187,000 
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------   --------- 
                                 7,351,000   9,084,000   6,223,000   8,261,000 
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------   --------- 
                                 ---------   ---------   ---------   --------- 

                                      -14-