alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

THOMAS C. SOSA, JR., §

TDCJ No. 2374326, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-2078-K-BN

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case (the FCR). An objection was filed by Petitioner. The 

District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the FCR to which objection was made 

and reviewed the remaining portions for plain error. Finding no error, the Court 

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge. The Court therefore DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Petitioner 

Thomas C. Sosa, Jr.’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 31]. And the Court 

need not rule on a certificate of appealability as to this denial as it is not a final order 

in this proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A).

SO ORDERED,

Signed April 18th, 2023.

____________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-02078-K-BN Document 35 Filed 04/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 721
Case 2:22-cv-00111-Z-BR Document 22 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 100
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 2 of 12 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 3 of 12 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 4 of 12 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 5 of 12 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 6 of 12 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 7 of 12 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 8 of 12 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 9 of 12 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 10 of 12 PageID 10
AO 243 (Rev. 09/17)

18. TIMELINESS OF MOTION: If your judgment of conviction became final over one year ago, you must explain

why the one-year statute of limitations as contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 does not bar your motion.*

* The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) as contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2255,

paragraph 6, provides in part that:

A one-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section. The limitation period shall run

from the latest of –

(1) the date on which the judgment of conviction became final;

(2) the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of

the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making such a

motion by such governmental action;

(3) the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has

been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral

review; or

(4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered

through the exercise of due diligence.

Page 12 of 13

The Fifth Circuit affirmed this Court’s judgment on March 29, 2021. From that date, Mr. Taylor had 150 days to 

file a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.On March 19, 2020, the Supreme Court 

issued an Order extending the deadline to file a petition for writ of certiorari to 150 days in the wake of the 

COVID-19 pandemic. The Court’s Order was rescinded on July 19, 2021. 

 Because Mr. Taylor did not petition for certiorari, his judgment of conviction became final 150 days after the Fifth 

Circuit’s judgment, or on August 26, 2021. Accordingly, Mr. Taylor’s motion is timely filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(f)(1) if filed on or before August 26, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 11 of 12 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cv-00756-O Document 1 Filed 08/26/22 Page 12 of 12 PageID 12
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 

134460 

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v 

ROBERT E. BUTCHER,

Respondent-Appellant, 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 134460 

 ADB: 04-21-GA 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court. 

p1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
# Official Journal L 286/28 O

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4828 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 286

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4828 October 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MAISHA SYKES, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00794-O-BP

 § 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 

No. 29) and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED on this 10th day of March, 2023.

Case 4:22-cv-00794-O Document 50 Filed 03/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 343
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,413,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,480,906
<PP&E>                                          53,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,502,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          324,657
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,749
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,176,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,502,980
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               665,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (616,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (616,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (616,340)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ANTHONY FADAYOMI, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00684-O-BP

 §

CHEX SYSTEMS, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED on this 10th day of November, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00684-O Document 8 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 31
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC., et al., 

Intervenor Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Defense Distributed’s Opposed Emergency Motion for Injunction 

Pending Appeal (ECF No. 249), filed August 9, 2023. The Court ORDERS Defendants to respond 

to this motion no later than August 17, 2023. Defense Distributed may reply no later than 

August 21, 2023. 

SO ORDERED this 10th day of August, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 250 Filed 08/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4978
Agenda – February 2013 Refunding 

Treasury Dealer Meetings – January 31-February 1, 2013 

Dealer ___________________ 

To allow more time for discussion, please e-mail your responses prior to 12:00 PM on Monday, January 28, 2013 to 

Debt.Management@treasury.gov , Sean.Savage@ny.frb.org, and Kale.Smimmo@ny.frb.org. Even if you are not 

scheduled to meet with Treasury officials this quarter, your responses are still appreciated. 

I. Marketable Borrowing Estimates 

 Central 

Estimate 

Range that would not 

surprise you 

 Low/High 

 January – March 2013 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 April – June 2013 / 

 Ending Cash Balance / 

 FY 2013 Total Net Marketable Borrowing 

 FY 2014 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 FY 2015 Total Net Marketable Borrowing / 

 

II. Budget Deficit and Growth Estimates 

 FY 2013 / 

 FY 2014 / 

 FY 2015 / 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2013 

 Real GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2014 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2013 

 Nominal GDP(4Q/4Q YoY % Chg) CY2014 

 

III. Quarterly Note and Bond Issuance Estimates 

 3-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 10-year note (Feb) / 

 10-year note reopening (Mar/Apr) / / - / 

 30-year bond (Feb) / 

 30-year bond reopening (Mar/Apr) / 

 2-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 5-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 7-year note (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 30-year TIPS (Feb) 

 10-year TIPS reopening (Mar) 

 5-year TIPS (Apr) 

 

IV. Bill Issuance Estimates 

 52-week bill size (Feb/Mar/Apr) / / / / - / / 

 Total change in bills outstanding 2/13-4/13 / 

 Total change in bills outstanding FY 2013 / 

 CMB issuance Feb ‘13 – Apr ‘13 (size/date) / / / / 

Discussion Topics

1. Please discuss your latest economic and fiscal forecasts for FY2013 and FY2014. Do you believe the current 

auction schedule is well-suited to meet Treasury’s expected financing needs? What adjustments, if any, would 

you recommend? 

2. Please discuss the current drivers of supply and demand in the Treasury bill and repo markets. To what extent are 

pending policy or regulatory developments impacting trading dynamics? If so, how? 

3. Please comment on how new derivative registration and reporting requirements affect the interest rate swap 

market and whether there is any notable impact on the Treasury market.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                              Executive Bonus Plan

The Executive Bonus Plan for calendar year 2000 is designed to reward ACT's
executive staff for their contributions to the achievement of the company's
FY2000 six month financial objectives of Revenue and pre-tax Income/(Loss),
measured as a weighted achievement against goals, and the first six months of
FY01.

Payout for the second six months of the Plan is contingent upon the Company
achieving operating income of at least $190K in the fourth quarter of calendar
2000- if this is not achieved, second six month bonuses are not payable.

The bonus drivers are weighted 60% on revenues and 40% on pre-tax Income/
(Loss) - on a post-bonus basis. At weighted achievement against plan of 85%,
participants receive 5% of their base salary. At weighted achievement against
plan of 100%, participants receive between 20% and 30% of their base salary
(depending upon the particulars of their participation in the plan).

The plan provides for straight line achievement between the floor (at 85%
weighted achievement against goals) and 100% weighted achievement, with the same
rate beyond 100% weighted achievement.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 70356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29850]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0040]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Entitled Application 
for Shipping Instructions and Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Federal Supply Service, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to 
an existing OMB clearance (3090-0040).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve an extension of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Application for Shipping Instructions and Notice 
of Availability.

DATES: Comment Due Date: January 22, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Marjorie Ashby, General Services 
Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Crockett, Acquisition 
Operations & Electronic Commerce Center, Supply Management Division, 
(703) 305-7551.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
approve information collection, 3090-0400, concerning Application for 
Shipping Instructions and Notice of Availability. This information 
collection supports and justifies the markup of the six percent 
surcharge for the GSA export reimbursable program. It also is used to 
evaluate and obtain the best cube utilization of shipping vans and 
containers for export direct delivery shipments. The form contains data 
necessary to prepare Transportation Control and Movement Documents 
(TCMD) which are required when material enters the Defense 
Transportation System.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 360; Annual responses: 3,000; average hours per 
response: .20; burden hours: 1,000.

Copy of Proposal

    A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the GSA Acquisition 
Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or by faxing 
your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
David A. Drabkin,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29850 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 312 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 312

   To provide for the designation of September 1, 1994, as ``Working 
                            Mothers' Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1994

  Mrs. Collins of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   To provide for the designation of September 1, 1994, as ``Working 
                            Mothers' Day''.

Whereas more than twenty million American women are employed outside the home 
        and have children under the age of eighteen;
Whereas these working mothers are making unique and substantial contributions to 
        both the growth of the economy and the strength of the American family; 
        and
Whereas working mothers deserve special recognition for fulfilling their 
        exceptional responsibilities in the home and in the world of commerce: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the 
United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
designating September 1, 1994, as ``Working Mothers' Day'', and calling 
upon families, individual citizens, labor and civic organizations, the 
media, and the business community to acknowledge the importance of 
working mothers and to express appreciation for their role in American 
society.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.3

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel L. Clemmens, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ DANIELL.CLEMMENS                                                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel L. ClemmensVice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the General Partner |   |
| May 14, 2008                                                               |   |
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: July 17, 2018 

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960 

Readout of Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting

Washington – U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive session at the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury. 

The Council discussed an application from a bank holding company or its successor under 

section 117 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

The Council also received an update regarding the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System’s recently announced results of the Dodd-Frank Act stress tests and the Comprehensive 

Capital Analysis and Review. 

The Council also discussed the ongoing reevaluation of its designation of a nonbank financial 

company.

Finally, the Council voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on June 15.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved meeting 

minutes is available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29475]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  November 27, 2000 at 2 p.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
1. Agenda for future meeting: none
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. No. 731-TA-894 (Preliminary) (Ammonium Nitrate from Ukraine)--
briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit 
its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on November 27, 2000; 
Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to 
the Secretary of Commerce on December 4, 2000.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: none

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: November 14 , 2000.

    By order of the Commission:
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29475 Filed 11-14-00; 1:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P