alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:22-cr-00290-S Document 30 Filed 03/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 145
Aggregated Perspectives on Treasury Auction Sizes, October 23, 2017

Tranche

MEAN STD MEAN STD MEAN STD

Bills

4-week 25 4.7 61 7.2 13 4.2

13-week 26 4.8 46 5.2 7 2.7

26-week 21 2.3 41 2.8 6 2.5

52-week 16 3.4 31 3.8 4 2.0

Coupons

2-year 21 1.9 41 5.2 3 1.2

3-year 20 1.2 37 4.3 3 1.1

5-year 27 3.0 41 2.3 3 1.1

7-year 22 2.1 35 2.6 3 0.8

10-year 19 1.3 31 3.3 3 1.1

30-year 11 1.4 20 2.5 2 0.9

TIPS

5-year 12 1.3 20 2.4 2 0.8

10-year 10 1.2 17 1.9 2 0.7

30-year 6 0.7 11 1.7 2 0.7

FRN

2-year 12 4.4 22 7.2 3 1.3

Minimum Auction Size needed to 

maintain Benchmark Liquidity ($bil)

Maximum Auction Size that could be 

issued without causing significant 

yield deviations from fair value ($bil)

Maximum change (+/-) per quarter in 

auction size ($bil)

The Treasury Department’s Office of Debt Management (ODM) would like your perspectives on current Treasury auction sizes. This

information would be used to help test ODM’s debt-issuance modeling assumptions, and does not reflect potential policy decisions. 

We appreciate your participation in a similar survey conducted in May 2017, and the aggregate response can be found online at 

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/quarterly-refunding/Pages/archived-auction-survey.aspx

For each of the 14 securities that Treasury currently issues regularly and occasional CMBs, we would be interested in your views on 

the following matters:

1) All else equal, what is the minimum auction size, per auction, needed to maintain benchmark liquidity? Specifically, what is the 

smallest auction size (weekly for bills, monthly for coupons) necessary to support “on-the-run” issue liquidity in the secondary 

market?

2) All else equal, what is the maximum auction size, per auction, that could be issued without causing “significant yield deviations” 

from current fair value? This fair value could, for example, be as measured by your spline, or other analytical models.

3) All else equal, what is the maximum change in auction size (+/- X $billions) that can be implemented between two consecutive 

new issuances without causing “significant yield deviations”?

The Treasury Department’s Office of Debt Management (ODM) surveyed all 23 primary dealers on their firms’ perspectives on current 

Treasury auction sizes. The results presented below are “trimmed mean” and “trimmed standard deviation”. That is, the high and low 

values of all 23 responses for any maturity tranche are deleted before computing the average and standard deviation.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 06, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 06, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0190. JOSEPH LEE GRINER v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 9 February 2006

in Joined Cases C-226/04 and C-228/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio in La Cascina Soc. coop. arl. and Others v Ministero della Difesa and Others and Consorzio G.f.M. v Ministero della Difesa and Others (1)

(Public service contracts - Directive 92/50/EEC - Article 29, first paragraph, subparagraphs (e) and (f) - Obligations of service providers - Payment of social security contributions and taxes )

(2006/C 86/11)

Language of the case: Italian

In Joined Cases C-226/04 and C-228/04: references for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio (Italy), made by decisions of 22 April 2004, received at the Court on 2 June 2004, in the proceedings between La Cascina Soc. coop. arl, Zilch Srl (C-226/04) and Ministero della Difesa, Ministero dell'Economia e delle finanze, Pedus Service, Cooperativa Italiana di Ristorazione soc. coop. arl (CIR), Istituto nazionale per l'assicurazione contro gli infortuni (INAIL), and between Consorzio G.f.M. (C-228/04) and Ministero della Difesa, La Cascina Soc. coop arl, the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann, N. Colneric, K. Lenaerts and E. Juhász (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 February 2006, in which it ruled:

Subparagraphs (e) and (f) of the first paragraph of Article 29 of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts do not preclude a national law or administrative practice according to which a service provider, who has not fulfilled obligations relating to social security contributions and taxes by having paid in full when the period prescribed for submitting the request to participate in the contract expires, may subsequently regularise his position

provided that, within the period prescribed by national law or administrative practice, he provides evidence that he has benefited from such measures or arrangement or that he has brought such proceedings within that period.

----

(1)OJ C 190, of 24.7.2004.

----
#### GRIGSBY v. STATE.

No. 26162.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1953.

Bell & Blair, Beaumont, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged under Article 6675a-6a, Vernon’s Revised Civil Statutes, providing for the registration of a commercial motor vehicle to be used by the owner thereof only in the transportation of his own poultry, dairy, livestock, livestock products, timber in its natural state, and farm products to market, etc., the registration demanded therefor being one-half of the fee for the registration of other motor vehicles not used for such above transpor-tations. Upon his conviction, appellant was assessed a fine of $25 and costs.

The facts herein show that Grady S. Grigsby had thus paid at the rate of one-half of the usual fee for a certain motor vehicle which was operated by one Andrew C. Bean, in Jefferson County. A complaint was filed against Grigsby for such operation of this motor vehicle.

There is no statement of facts herein, but the cause was tried on the stipulation made in open court by counsel for both sides in which it is shown that Mr. Grigsby purchased by deed dated November 14, 1951, all standing timber on a certain tract of land; that the timber which was then and there being hauled by Grigsby’s agent (Andrew C. Bean) was the timber off of this certain tract of land; that same had been felled by said Grigsby, his agents, servants and employees at the time of the date of his arrest herein and was in its natural state; that it was being hauled to ■Grigsby’s sawmill near Vidor, in Orange County, Texas, for processing. It was admitted that Mr. Grigsby did not own the *872surface or minerals on which the said timber was cut and removed, but did own the said standing timber from and after the date of the aforesaid deed, to-wit, November 14, 1951.

It was 'further agreed that the said commercial motor vehicle was properly equipped and was not otherwise engaged in a violation of the law, and that it was' used by the owner at such time only for the transportation of his own timber. .

As we understand the law, we see no violation thereof, since this man was transporting his own timber in its natural state from the place of its purchase, for his own use, to his own sawmill. Under the law, we think he was within his rights at such time.

Therefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### BAILEY v. STATE.

No. 21929.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1942.

R. E. Eubank, of Paris, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is the use of violently abusive language under circumstances reasonably calculated to provoke a breach of the peace. The penalty assessed is a fine of $25.

No notice of appeal appears in the record. This is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court to consider the appeal. See Art. 827, C.C.P., and cases cited under said article in Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C. P., Vol. 3, p. 197. See also Branch’s Ann. Tex.P.C., sec. 588.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 135

To designate the months of May 1993 and May 1994 as ‘‘National Trauma

Awareness Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1993

Mr. MINETA (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr.

PETRI, Mr. DE LUGO, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. WISE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr.

COSTELLO, Mr. LAUGHLIN, Mr. SANGMEISTER, Mr. SWETT, Ms. NORTON, Mr. BLACKWELL, Mr. COPPERSMITH, Ms. DANNER, Mr. BARCIA,

Mr. FILNER, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. EWING, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. KIM, Mr. BLUTE, and Mr. MCKEON) introduced the following

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and

Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the months of May 1993 and May 1994 as

‘‘National Trauma Awareness Month’’.

Whereas more than 9,000,000 individuals in the United

States suffer traumatic injury each year;

Whereas traumatic injury is the leading cause of death for

individuals under 44 years of age in the United States;

Whereas every individual is a potential victim of traumatic injury;
2

•HJ 135 IH

Whereas traumatic injury often occurs without warning;

Whereas traumatic injury frequently renders its victims incapable of caring for themselves;

Whereas past inattention to the causes and effects of trauma

has led to the inclusion of trauma among the most neglected medical conditions in the United States;

Whereas it is estimated that the people of the United States

will spend more than $175,000,000,000 this year on the

problem of trauma;

Whereas trauma is preventable and increased efforts to prevent trauma would reduce or eliminate deaths and disability due to trauma;

Whereas the problem of trauma can be remedied only by prevention and treatment through emergency medical services and trauma systems; and

Whereas the people of the United States must be educated

in the prevention and treatment of trauma and in the

proper and effective use of emergency medical systems:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 1993 and May 1994 are each designated as

4 ‘‘National Trauma Awareness Month’’ and the President

5 is authorized and directed to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe these

7 months with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
Case 4:22-cr-00248-P Document 43 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 42
Case 4:22-cr-00248-P Document 43 Filed 08/31/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 43
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Glen Canyon Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG) and Glen Canyon 
Technical Work Group (TWG); Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meetings; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation published a notice of public 
meetings in the Federal Register of October 19, 2000 (65 FR 62750), 
concerning meetings of the Glen Canyon Adaptive Management Work Group 
(AMWG) and Glen Canyon Technical Work Group (TWG). The document 
contained incorrect dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Peterson, telephone (801) 524-
3758; faxogram (801) 524-3858; E-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5b7b5a0b1a0b7b6aaab85b0a6ebb0b6a7b7eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dfadafbaabbaadacb0b19faabcf1aaacbdadf1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a>

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 19, 2000, in the FR Doc. 00-
26934, on page 62750, in the first column, correct the ``Dates and 
Location'' caption to read:

DATES AND LOCATION: The AMWG will conduct two public meetings as 
follows:
    Phoenix, Arizona--January 11-12, 2001. The meeting will begin at 
9:30 a.m. and conclude at 4:00 p.m. on the first day and begin at 8 
a.m. and conclude at 12 noon on the second day. The meeting will be 
held at the Bureau of Indian Affairs--Western Regional Office, 2 
Arizona Center, Conference Rooms A and B (12th Floor), 400 North 5th 
Street, Phoenix, Arizona.

    Dated: November 15, 2000.
Eluid L. Martinez,
Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 00-29657 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal L 272/2011

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.272.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 272 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5418 October 2011 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.272.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 272

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5418 October 2011

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products and repealing Council Directive 73/44/EEC and Directives 96/73/EC and 2008/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products and repealing Council Directive 73/44/EEC and Directives 96/73/EC and 2008/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 9 4 5

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, J u l y 2 8

, 2 0 1 5 1 0 : 0 6 A M

T o : c h r i s @ 4 w e b c a s t

. c o m

D e a r M r

. F a n n i n g :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 1 9 4 5 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 9 6 7 7

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Annual Report of GFSB Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2002 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Richard C. Kauzlaric,  President, and Jerry R. Spurlin, Chief Financial Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  pre1ents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/Richard C. Kauzlaric                 /s/Jerry R. Spurlin
--------------------------------        ----------------------------------------
Richard C. Kauzlaric                    Jerry R. Spurlin
President                               Chief Financial Officer




November 13, 2002
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 229

Establishing July 13, 1993, as ‘‘Cost of Government Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1993

Mr. DELAY (for himself, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr.

BALLENGER, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr.

CALVERT, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. HEFLEY, Ms.

DUNN, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. LINDER, Mr. KIM, Mr. HERGER, Mr. THOMAS

of Wyoming, Mr. HORN, Mr. GOODLATTE, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr.

HOKE, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, and Mr. GOODLING) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred jointly

to the Committees on Government Operations and Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Establishing July 13, 1993, as ‘‘Cost of Government Day’’.

Whereas the cost of Government has increased from 48.48

percent of net national product (NNP) in 1989 to an estimated 53.10 percent of NNP in 1993;

Whereas the total cost of Government now approaches

$3,000,000,000,000;

Whereas Federal regulatory costs now exceed

$600,000,000,000 annually;
2

•HJ 229 IH

Whereas the cost of Government in general and regulations

in particular have placed a tremendous drain on the

economy in recent years by reducing worker productivity,

increasing prices to consumers, and increasing unemployment; and

Whereas the average American worker does not earn enough

money to pay off all his or her Government-imposed financial obligations (Government spending and the cost of

regulations) until July 13, 1993: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That we, the United States Congress, do

2 hereby recognize July 13, 1993, as Cost of Government

3 Day and encourage all Federal, State, and local elected

4 officials to carefully consider the costs of Government

5 spending and regulatory schemes in the year to come.

Æ
DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING PAGE 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ARIANA GEORGE and RODNEY §

BOONE, Individually and as §

Representative of the Estate of AMARI §

BOONE, Deceased, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

vs. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3-22-cv-1124-S

§

ACH CHILD and FAMILY SERVICES, §

et al. §

§

Defendants. §

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Defendant Chaisity Frida-Caro submits this motion to request that her deadline to file an 

answer or other responsive pleading under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, which is currently due on October 

25, 2022, be extended to November 8, 2022. Defendant requests this extension as Defendant’s 

counsel was in a lengthy trial which just concluded and counsel assisting left the firm.

This is Defendant’s first request for such an extension. Plaintiff’s counsel was unopposed 

to this request.

We thank the Court for its time and attention to this matter.

Case 3:22-cv-01124-S Document 19 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 536
DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING PAGE 2

Respectfully submitted,

QUINTAIROS, PRIETO, WOOD & BOYER, P.A.

By: /s/ Frank Alvarez 

FRANK ALVAREZ

State Bar No. 00796122

frank.alvarez@qpwblaw.com

1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4545

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 754-8755

Facsimile: (214) 754-8744

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

CHAISITY FRIDA-CARO

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on October 25, 2022, this document was filed electronically via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system, causing electronic service upon all counsel of record.

/s/ Frank Alvarez

FRANK ALVAREZ

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that on October 25, 2022, I emailed counsel for the Plaintiff, Ashley D. 

Washington, to ask if she opposed the relief requested in this motion. Counsel stated that she is 

not opposed to this motion or the relief requested herein.

/s/ Frank Alvarez

FRANK ALVAREZ

Case 3:22-cv-01124-S Document 19 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 537
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public LimitedCompany (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 8, 2005              /s/ Thomas J. McDonald   Thomas J. McDonald   Chief Financial Officer