alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2015 Roundtable on Treasury Markets and Debt Management

Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty Street, Benjamin Strong Room

Thursday, November 19, 2015 and Friday, November 20, 2015

Agenda

Debt Issuance Modeling Framework

Thursday, November 19, 2015

12:00pm – 1:00pm Registration

1:00pm – 1:15pm Conference Introduction and Opening Remarks

James Clark, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Finance, U.S. Treasury

1:15pm – 2:00pm Presentation of U.S. Treasury’s Debt Issuance Modeling Framework

Seth Carpenter, Acting Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets, U.S. Treasury

2:00pm – 2:15pm Presentation of Market’s Views on Treasury’s Framework

Brian Sack, Director of Global Economics, D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.

2:15pm – 3:30pm

Panel on Alternative Views on Issuance Modeling

Moderator:

Seth Carpenter, Acting Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets, U.S. Treasury

Panelists:

Alejandro Diaz de Leon Carrillo, Deputy Undersecretary for Public Credit, Ministry of 

Finance and Public Credit of Mexico

Christine Hurtsellers, CIO Fixed Income, Voya Investment Management

Robert Stheeman, CEO, UK DMO

Jonathan Wright, Professor of Economics, Johns Hopkins University

3:30pm – 4:00pm Coffee Break

4:00pm – 5:00pm

A Conversation with Paul Volcker

Paul Volcker, Chairman, The Volcker Alliance

Moderated by Kenneth Garbade, SVP, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

5:00pm – 6:00pm Cocktail Reception

Dinner for Speakers

Thursday, November 19, 2015

6:30pm – 8:30pm

(By separate invitation only)

The Federal Reserve’s Counterparty Framework: Past, Present and Future

Introduction

Kenneth Garbade, SVP, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Speaker

Simon Potter, EVP and Head of Markets Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
2015 Roundtable on Treasury Markets and Debt Management

Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty Street, Benjamin Strong Room

Thursday, November 19, 2015 and Friday, November 20, 2015

Agenda

Evolution of Treasury Market and Its Implications

Friday, November 20, 2015

8:00am – 8:45am Registration and Continental Breakfast

8:45am – 9:15am

Program Introduction and Opening Remarks

Program Introduction

James McAndrews, EVP and Director of Research, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Opening Remarks

Jerome Powell, Governor, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

9:15am – 9:30am Perspectives from Treasury

Antonio Weiss, Counselor to the Secretary, U.S. Treasury

9:30am – 10:45am

Panel on the Evolution of Treasury Market

Moderator:

Antonio Weiss, Counselor to the Secretary, U.S. Treasury

Panelists:

Gil Mandelzis, CEO EBS BrokerTec, ICAP

Scott Minerd, Chairman and Global CIO, Guggenheim

Donald Wilson, Founder and CEO, DRW Trading Group

Tom Wipf, Head of Funding and Chair of TMPG, Morgan Stanley

10:45am – 11:00am Perspectives from Federal Reserve

Lorie Logan, SVP and Deputy SOMA Manager, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

11:00am – 11:15am Coffee Break

11:15am – 12:00pm Keynote Speech: Views about the evolution of the Treasury market

Ken Griffin, Founder and CEO, Citadel

12:00pm Concluding Remarks

James McAndrews, EVP and Director of Research, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 354

Designating May 22, 1994, as ‘‘National Neighbor Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1994

Mr. REED introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating May 22, 1994, as ‘‘National Neighbor Day’’.

Whereas the increased incidents of crime, drugs, and violence

have continued to plague our cities and towns;

Whereas many people have become alienated from their

neighbors; and

Whereas in light of these recent developments which have affected all of us, all citizens of the United States are encouraged to signify their support for peace, harmony, and

friendship by introducing themselves and extending a

warm welcome to new people in their neighborhoods, as

well as renewing old friendships: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HJ 354 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 22, 1994 is designated as ‘‘National Neighbor

4 Day’’, and the President is authorized and requested to

5 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

6 States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies

7 and activities.

Æ
Plaintiff(s) 

V.

United States District Court 

 Eastern District of California

Case Number:

APPLICATION FOR PRO HAC VICE 

AND PROPOSED ORDER

Defendant(s)

Pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(2) of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 

 hereby applies for permission to appear and participate as 

counsel in the above entitled action on behalf of the following party or parties:

On (date), I was admitted to practice and presently in good standing in the

 (court). A certificate of good standing from that court is 

submitted in conjunction with this application. I have not been disbarred or formally censured by a court of 

record or by a state bar association; and there are not disciplinary proceedings against me. 

 I have / I have not concurrently or within the year preceding this application made a pro hac vice 

application to this court. (If you have made a pro hac vice application to this court within the last year, list 

the name and case number of each matter in which an application was made, the date of application and 

whether granted or denied.)

Date: Signature of Applicant: /s/ 

U.S. District Court – Pro Hac Vice Application 

Revised July 6, 2021 

Page 1 

/

Tara Farrell et al.

2:21-cv-01691-JAM-JDP

New Millennium Concepts, Ltd.

Benjamin B. Breckler

New Millennium Concepts, Ltd.

12/04/2020

Supreme Court of Texas

01/26/2022

✔

Benjamin B. Breckler

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 37 Filed 01/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 668
Pro Hac Vice Attorney

Applicant's Name: 

Law Firm Name: 

Address: 

City: State: Zip: 

Phone Number w/Area Code: 

City and State of Residence: 

Primary E-mail Address: 

Secondary E-mail Address: 

I hereby designate the following member of the Bar of this Court who is registered for ECF with whom the 

Court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding the conduct of the case and upon whom 

electronic notice shall also be served via the Court’s ECF system: 

Local Counsel's Name: 

Law Firm Name: 

Address: 

City: State: Zip: 

Phone Number w/Area Code: Bar # 

ORDER 

Dated: January 26, 2022 /s/John A. Mendez

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

U.S. District Court – Pro Hac Vice Application 

Revised July 6, 2021 

Page 2

Benjamin B. Breckler

Haynes and Boone, LLP

2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700

Dallas TX 75219

(214) 651-5263

Dallas, TX

ben.breckler@haynesboone.com

kim.dean@haynesboone.com

Mark D. Erickson

Haynes and Boone, LLP

600 Anton Blvd., Ste. 700

Costa Mesa CA 92626

(949) 202-3000 104403

The Pro Hac Vice Application is APPROVED. The Pro Hac Vice Attorney is DIRECTED to request

filing access through PACER.

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 37 Filed 01/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 669
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL DAVID MCCALL, §

#57215-177, §

MOVANT, §

§

V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:22-CV-1656-M-BK

§ (CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3:18-CR-240-M-1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

RESPONDENT. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. Objections were filed on December 6, 2023 [ECF No. 15]. The District Court 

reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to 

which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 12th day of December, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-01656-M-BK Document 16 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 101
Page 1 of 1

CDFI 3.1 Table

$000,000s

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Percent

Capital Investments Total 4.469 - 4.831 - 9.300 1.471 - 4.882 - 6.353 1.513 - 3.279 - 4.792 -25%

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 4.469 - 4.831 - 9.300 1.471 - 4.882 - 6.353 1.513 - 3.279 - 4.792 -25%

Standard/Non-Standard IT sub-total

IT Total 4.469 - 4.831 - 9.300 1.471 - 4.882 - 6.353 1.513 - 3.279 - 4.792 -25%

CDFI non-Major IT Investments

Award Management Information System 4.080 - 2.478 - 6.558 1.471 - 3.886 - 5.357 1.513 - 3.118 - 4.631 -14%

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

4.080 - 2.478 - 6.558 1.471 - 3.886 - 5.357 1.513 - 3.118 - 4.631 -14%

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund 

Public Website

- - 0.131 - 0.131 - - 0.161 - 0.161 - - 0.161 - 0.161 0%

015-05-4560 ATreasury Franchise Fund - - 0.131 - 0.131 - - 0.131 - 0.131 - - 0.131 - 0.131 0%

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

- - - - - - - 0.030 - 0.030 - - 0.030 - 0.030 0%

Community Investment Impact System - - 0.884 - 0.884 - - 0.633 - 0.633 - - - - - -100%

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

- - 0.884 - 0.884 - - 0.633 - 0.633 - - - - - -100%

IT Program Management Support 0.390 - 0.900 - 1.290 - - - - - - - - - - NA

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

0.390 - 0.900 - 1.290 - - - - - - - - - - NA

Legacy Mission Systems - - 0.439 - 0.439 - - 0.201 - 0.201 - - - - - -100%

015-05-1881 Community Development Financial 

Institutions Fund Program Account

- - 0.439 - 0.439 - - 0.201 - 0.201 - - - - - -100%

FY 2017 Actuals FY 2018 President's Budget FY 2019 President's Budget

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

Change 

from CY 

to BY
# Dividends

# Footnotes

# CPP Missed Payments

# CPP MP Footnotes

# CDCI Missed Payments

# Sheet1

# CDCI MP Footnotes
# Official Journal L 316/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 316 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6330 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 316

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6330 September 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1360 of 28 September 2020 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2020) 6435)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1360 of 28 September 2020 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2020) 6435)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 6435)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kenneth R. Aubrey, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                       
| | --------------------------------------
| | /s/ Kenneth R. Aubrey                 
| | Kenneth R. Aubrey                     
| | President and Chief
 Executive Officer
| | November 12, 2010                     

---
#### In the Matter of New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Appellant, v Ray MacLeod et al., Respondents.

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cheeseman, J.), entered September 29, 1989 in Albany County, which, *inter alia,*dismissed petitioner’s application pursuant to Tax Law § 1848 (c) to confirm the seizure of respondents’ motor fuel and vehicles.

Respondent Ray MacLeod is a Canadian citizen licensed by the United States Government as an Indian trader pursuant to 25 USC § 261*et seq.*In May 1989, MacLeod arranged for delivery of 8,000 gallons of motor fuel from Canada to the Oneida Indian Reservation located within New York. The fuel had been purchased from a Canadian exporter, respondent MacEwen Fuels, Ltd., and was to be delivered by an independent trucking contractor, respondent Bruce R. Roundpoint, doing business as Roundpoint Construction Company. On May 23, 1989, Roundpoint’s driver picked up the fuel and was given a loading ticket, an invoice and a customs and excise document. He then proceeded to the United States Customs station outside the City of Massena, St. Lawrence County, where the fuel was approved for entry into the United States. The driver was then detained by petitioner’s agents and the fuel and the truck that transported it were seized because the driver did not have the requisite "Uniform Gasoline Manifest” and none of respondents were registered as motor fuel distributors or importers as required by the Tax Law *(see,*Tax Law §§ 283, 283-a, 1848 [a]). Petitioner then made this motion to confirm the seizure *(see,*Tax Law § 1848 [c]). Supreme Court denied the motion to confirm, concluding that the seizure statute was inapplicable because the fuel was destined for an Indian reservation and was not "for use, distribution, storage or sale in the state” (Tax Law § 1848 [a]). Petitioner now appeals.

We affirm, although for reasons somewhat different than those relied on by Supreme Court. It is our view that, inasmuch as the relevant tax statutes impose a burden on the *803Indian trader, they are preempted by Federal law *(see, Herzog Bros. Trucking v State Tax Commn.,*69 NY2d 536, *on remand*72 NY2d 720). This court so held in a recent case regarding a similar tax scheme applicable to cigarette sales on Indian reservations *(see, Attea & Bros. v Department of Taxation & Fin. of State of N. Y.,*164 AD2d 300). As stated therein, the Court of Appeals’ reasoning in *Herzog Bros. Trucking v State Tax Commn.*(69 NY2d 536, *supra)*is dispositive on the issue of State tax laws that impose additional burdens on Indian traders *(see, Attea & Bros. v Department of Taxation & Fin. of State of N. Y., supra).*"[N]o matter how minimal the burden imposed by the motor fuel taxation scheme on [Indian traders], such regulation is preempted by the Federal Indian trader laws” *(Herzog Bros. Trucking v State Tax Commn.,*69 NY2d 536, 546, *supra).*Accordingly, Supreme Court correctly denied the motion to confirm the seizure.

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 52/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 52 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6314 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 52

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6314 February 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 52/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2020/C 52/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 5 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 52/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2020/C 52/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### SALVATION ARMY OF TEXAS v. EDMONDSON et al.

No. 12553.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 8, 1953.

*953D. Richard Voges, Floresville, Robert D. O’Callaghan, San Antonio, for appellant.

Murray & McDowell, Floresville, for appellees.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is the first of two suits between the Salvation Army of Texas and the heirs at law of William M. Edmondson. In the present case, the Salvation Army claims under an instrument in writing which was admitted to probate in the county court, but rejected as a will in the district court. The instrument is in the form of a letter and is as follows:

> “San Antonio, Texas.

> “1-15-50

> “Dear Mr. Denmark,

> “Stockdale, Tex.

> “Dear Friend

> “I am in the Baptist Memorial hospital for a very serious operation and want you to attent to some business for me. First, my income tax report, which will just be a report. I will include the previous year report, and also, the figures on 1949 Oct. Farm lease $512.50, State and Co. tax 14.84 school taxes $21.50, and I don’t know of any other expenses or anything so, these are the figures. As to the ‘Will’

> I have signed a blank sheet of paper of which you could make it out on for Jan. 9, 1950. Being of sound mind I do this day in case of my death, my property and everything reverts back to my father, Will Edmondson. And in case death takes us both, the property, '95 and 93 acres, shall go the organization of the Salvation Army, for the good and help of mankind, no relatives included.

> “Trustfully,

> “Miss Annie Edmondson

> “P. S. If possible get 2 witnesses to it and fix it up, as if I were there, don’t you think you could do that, Thanks, for all pst dealings, and prepare it, and give it to Dad, and send the income tax to Austin and thanks a million.

> “Yours truly,

> “Annie Edmondson”

A sheet of paper was sent with the letter which was blank except for the signature, “Miss Annie Edmondson” at the bottom thereof.

It appears that William M. Edmondson, referred to in the letter as Will Edmondson, survived his daughter, Annie Edmondson, who died on April 28, 1950, and was her sole heir at law. This being true, it is immaterial to the appellant if the letter be probated as a will or not, for, assuming that it is a valid will, William M. Edmond-son took a fee simple title thereunder, — the same interest he would receive under the statutes of descent and distribution. The contention of appellant that under the purported will William M. Edmondson received only a life estate, with remainder over to the • Salvation Army of Texas, is contrary to the decision of this Court in Thomson v. Schryver, 159 S.W.2d 955, which involved an instrument similar in terms to that now before us. See also, Article 1291, Vernon’s Tex.Civ.Stats.; Darragh v. Barmore, Tex.Com.App., 242 S.W. 714; Hughes v. Titterington, Tex.Civ.App., 168 S.W. 45.

Appellant having failed to show that it was in any way prejudiced by the rendition of the order appealed from, the same will be affirmed.