alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,561,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,041,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                     54,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,800,000
<PP&E>                                       1,207,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 764,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,473,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          621,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,381,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,473,000
<SALES>                                        334,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,156,000
<CGS>                                          160,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,117,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
IA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 386

To designate September 14, 1994, as ‘‘Mercy Otis Warren Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 1994

Mr. HUGHES introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate September 14, 1994, as ‘‘Mercy Otis Warren

Day’’.

Whereas Mercy Otis Warren was born on September 14,

1728, in Barnstable, Massachusetts, one of 13 children

who, while without a formal education, had a thirst for

knowledge and ardent interest in politics that transformed her into one of the prominent political thinkers

and commentators of her day;

Whereas Mercy Otis Warren maintained an aggressive concern for public affairs and the role of women in society,

and was determined that women should not be restricted

to domestic interests;

Whereas Mercy Otis Warren wrote numerous published works

providing commentary on the leading political figures of

the American Revolution and the political viewpoints of
2

•HJ 386 IH

the day, including a major literary work, the 3-volume

History of the Rise, Progress and Termination of the

American Revolution, completed in 1805;

Whereas Mercy Otis Warren was so well respected by her

contemporaries for her understanding of political issues

that her advice was sought by such notables as John and

Samuel Adams and Thomas Jefferson;

Whereas Mercy Otis Warren wrote a 19-page pamphlet published in 1788 entitled ‘‘Observations On The New Constitution’’, contributing to the political movement which

provided the foundation for the Bill of Rights; and

Whereas Mercy Otis Warren is recognized by American historians as a poet, patriot, and historian of the American

Revolution: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 14, 1994, is designated as ‘‘Mercy Otis

4 Warren Day’’, and the President is authorized and re5 quested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

6 the United States to observe such day with appropriate

7 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation,
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	        President

Date:		August 14, 2003
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2015-CCRE23 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 40 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 110
Case 3:22-cv-03278-C-BK Document 14 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 39
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3465 — SYNGENTA CP/ADVANTA)

(2004/C 263/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
z OFFICE.OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

b AUSTIN 

._ 

OQALD c. MANN firromn” omm- 



Tha WQ*~ of t4,eMl&mn In 8uohplaa.s wa. 

Gxnating tbn, that 

the 4gisfatrud was: 

tie pln00s a06igd0d, 

to hare boon used 

84 m.&‘#on to the WQ~ by $-ha phtpmrn6 fkrtof 

ik0080h00ttxt ia tih0 O~SO 0r C cwmmwsalth v. Riley, 97 

a, E. $67 '. wheiwia 8 8Batlfir ststuta was ,undor otmetrw- 

~:=*&I bs applisd In the. taterpr?tation OS tho ZW~J 

lkarcl tbs aourt said thatths wmd *employa 

QI wed i;o;man ,"Bo bare work" Q "to lpak.e~~wa t?f the 80w06 0r af3.mw. lB Xooln8kY T, 0rc.lwsl1, 11-Y. Y. - 

(1 Kom) S909r.khe word ~8, sgtil>; defined a. ~fol1ow.t 

Qbplatyme8~8 to two, as m Imtrummt or 

&BS ar,.sir0eiag ILIP 0bj.0ati .It~is aewora~ot 

more '&arged slgniiioafion tban~tho word him. 

A iiaa hiriad to labop 18~ emplotid but a lpan may 

be ‘em&oywS In wodr who Is not h&d;” 

- ~r~~.ie3r18~c~r0~e. 00~ op*t-slr ~that thhs lord wiiplof”’ 

a8 &180&i& drtiO~l.8 1573.'and 1674, Peti h&O Of %WUB~ 

m0fuie ttxm~a 30 iifm work, ortomki3 ueeoi-the semi.8 

of ru&hoatrd hnd'that the wazd. "a&f alaa* inala an 

appre&ios, a'warb,.or even oao*s cram aai or daughterI 

Tim statutea rola: 

i"f: 

to OhIld laber:(&!tlolo. 

157S-157&i, Fomal ood.1 prohlb t.nothw wh.loh Is oxmIMed 

in the statutee rela8ing to appmntioss~ *bat WM.0 ii Is prohlblfod by 8h0 Ohild 1abttC &W 4ipPlb38 with eqodl fOFo9 to 

apprsntloe.* 

In view of the80 obaorvcrtiam. It.I8 ths‘@inior this dapmont, end yootz .rs 80 advised, that there fs 

no oonfiio$ bot~oea the &atutae re&atW&tild fbar 

and those peaaittioa; the ap&W6ittiOing Of ldBO3!0. 

Youu tary truly
Fiscal Year Comparison of Full-Time 

Equivalent (FTE) Staffing

(Direct and Reimbursable)

 2012 Actual 2013 Annualized CR 2014 President's Budget

Appropriation Direct Reimb. Total Direct Reimb. Total Direct Reimb. Total

Departmental Offices Salaries and Expenses 1,181 129 1,310 1,199 172 1,371 1,171 132 1,303

Office of Inspector General 173 19 192 172 19 191 194 19 213

Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration 805 2 807 835 2 837 835 2 837

Special Inspector General for TARP 164 0 164 192 0 192 192 0 192

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund 69 0 69 79 0 79 76 0 76

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network 299 2 301 345 1 346 340 1 341

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 471 10 481 476 15 491 508 9 517

Bureau of the Fiscal Service 1,828 544 2,372 1,954 619 2,573 1,676 714 2,390

Internal Revenue Service 91,646 723 92,369 89,857 712 90,569 96,218 712 96,930

Subtotal, Treasury Appropriated Level 96,636 1,429 98,065 95,109 1,540 96,649 101,210 1,589 102,799

Office of Financial Stability (Administrative Account) 172 2 174 161 2 163 126 2 128

Small Business Lending Fund Program 27 0 27 28 0 28 25 0 25

State Small Business Credit Initiative 9 0 9 14 0 14 16 0 16

Financial Services Oversight Council 0 16 16 0 26 26 0 29 29

Office of Financial Research 44 21 65 137 30 167 215 35 250

Treasury Franchise Fund 0 1,347 1,347 0 1,485 1,485 0 1,516 1,516

Bureau of Engraving and Printing 0 1,872 1,872 0 1,880 1,880 0 1,880 1,880

United States Mint 0 1,788 1,788 0 1,844 1,844 0 1,874 1,874

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 0 3,656 3,656 0 3,782 3,782 0 3,782 3,782

Terrorism Insurance Program 6 0 6 10 0 10 10 0 10

Total 96,894 10,131 107,025 95,459 10,589 106,048 101,602 10,707 112,309

1/ Some accounts' FTE numbers do not match the President's Budget. The numbers presented in this table are the most current estimates after MAX locked.

2/ A portion of Fiscal Service's Reimbursable/Fee FTE is funded by fee revenue as authorized by the Debt Collection Improvement Act (DCIA) of 1996.

3/ IRS FY 2012 Actuals do not include 760 FTE funded from User Fees, 664 FTE from the Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund, and 4 FTE from the Federal Highway Transportation 

Authority Account; IRS FY 2013 Annualized CR Rate does not include 965 FTE funded from User Fees, 5 FTE from the Federal Highway Transportation Authority Account, and 16 FTE from the 

Therapeutic Discovery Grants and Administration Account; FY 2014 Request does not include 360 FTE funded from User Fees, 5 FTE from the Federal Highway Transportation Authority Account, 

and 16 FTE from the Therapeutic Discovery Grants and Administration Account.

4/ OFR reimbursable funding includes FTE funded by interagency agreements and offsetting 

collections.
## Department of Environmental Quality To protect, conserve and enhance the quality of Wyoming's environment for the benefit of current and future

_ qenerations. Matthew H . Mead , Governor February 28 , 2013 Mr. Howard Cantor Acting Regional Administrator US-EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop St. Denver, CO 80202-1129 Dear Mr. Cantor: Todd Parfitt , Director

In response to the promulgation of40 CFR part 60, Subpart LLLL, Standards of Performance for New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units and Subpart MMMM , Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units, the State of Wyoming is notifying Region 8 ofthe Environmental Protection Agency that we are not aware of any sources operating within the state that would meet the applicability criteria for this source category. The State of Wyoming, therefore, will not be submitting a 111 (d) plan for Sewage Sludge Incineration Units . Sincerely,

# t~a Steven A. Dietrich Administrator Air Quality Division

cc : Christine Anderson , AQD Jeni Cederle, AQD Kendra Morrison, EPA R8

He rschle r Build ing 1 22 West 25th St reet · Cheye nne , WY 8200 2 · http ://deq .state .wy . us ,!**1\ 'i** **~~** ()I J l I'·

. '· I: ' ,,,· ' t t I I ..**·.~·** ;t, l' I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-040-0l-H

ERIC MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE I,JMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JI]DGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming PIea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bxl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence willbe imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SOORDERED.

Dated Septemb 

", 1.?, zozz.

JAMES LEYHENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT ruDGE

fuN/4w

,

Case 1:22-cr-00040-H-BU Document 80 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 144
Case 4:22-cr-00278-Y Document 23 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 35
Case 4:22-cr-00278-Y Document 23 Filed 10/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 36
(logo)NTS

NATIONALTAX SEARCH, LLC

** **

 

130S Jefferson Street

Suite300

Chicago,IL 60631

(312)233-6440

 

 

REPORTON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND 

EXCHANGECOMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2017,National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank**(the“Servicer”)**.**

** **

National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible forassessing compliance as of December 31, 2017 and for the period from January 1,2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicingcriteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of FederalRegulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated toNTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performswith respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determinedthat the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SECRegulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect tothe transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by thisreport include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQsystem (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded thatNTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of December 31, 2017 and for the Reporting Period with respect tothe Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registeredpublic accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment ofcompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017 and forthe Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

NationalTax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/Lori Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 26, 2018
Tranche Change in 

Auction 

Size ($bil) 

per month

Change in 

Auction 

Size ($bil) 

per month

Change in 

Auction 

Size ($bil) 

per month

MEAN STD MEAN STD MEAN STD MEAN STD MEAN STD MEAN STD

4-week 23 4.0 58 4.6 13 4.2 5 2 1.8 10 4 3.9 20 7 7.9

13-week 22 2.9 44 4.1 8 2.3 2 2 2.1 4 3 3.5 8 7 7.7

26-week 21 2.5 41 3.6 7 2.4 2 2 2.4 4 4 4.2 8 7 8.2

52-week 16 3.2 31 3.2 5 2.2 2 3 2.8 4 5 5.6 8 8 8.8

2-year 21 1.6 41 5.0 4 1.8 1 1 1.0 2 2 2.5 4 5 6.5

3-year 20 0.9 37 6.4 4 1.8 1 1 1.4 2 3 3.0 4 6 8.6

5-year 27 2.6 41 2.6 3 1.2 1 2 2.4 2 4 4.7 4 8 11.5

7-year 22 2.0 35 2.4 3 1.0 1 2 3.5 2 5 5.4 4 10 15.7

10-year 19 1.2 30 2.5 3 1.1 1 3 2.9 2 5 5.6 4 12 17.6

30-year 11 1.7 19 2.0 2 0.9 1 4 4.3 2 8 8.3 4 18 21.4

5-year 13 1.4 20 2.3 2 0.8 1 3 3.0 2 5 7.0 4 9 11.8

10-year 10 1.4 18 1.9 2 0.9 1 3 3.9 2 7 7.9 4 14 19.1

30-year 6 0.7 11 1.8 2 0.9 1 5 5.8 2 10 10.8 4 22 28.6

2-year 10 0.8 19 1.7 3 1.1 1 1 1.9 2 3 3.2 4 5 7.4

Bills

Coupons

TIPS

FRN

Aggregated Perspectives on Treasury Auction Sizes, October 24, 2016

The Treasury Department’s Office of Debt Management (ODM) surveyed all 23 primary dealers on October 24, 2016 on their firms’ perspectives on current Treasury auction sizes. The results 

presented below are “trimmed mean” and “trimmed standard deviation”. That is, the high and low values of all 23 responses for any maturity tranche are deleted before computing the average and 

standard deviation.

Minimum Auction Size 

needed to maintain 

Benchmark Liquidity 

($bil)

Maximum Auction 

Size that could be 

issued without causing 

significant yield 

deviations from fair 

value ($bil)

Maximum change

(+/-) in auction size 

between new issuances 

($bil)

Change in Auction 

Stop Out Rate (bp) at 

end of 1 year given 

change in auction size

Change in Auction 

Stop Out Rate (bp) at 

end of 1 year given 

change in auction size

Change in Auction 

Stop Out Rate (bp) at 

end of 1 year given 

change in auction size
I 

Central Analytical Services •

1

MERCK 

I 

CAS AC 7.2 I Thermoanalyse Datum 23.11.10 

Dr. R. Schiwon 

S. Rudolph 

Auftraggeber: 

Auftragsdatum: 

Problemstellung: 

Proben: 

Durchitihrung : 

Gerat: 

Auswertung: 

Ergebnis: 

Anlagen: 

if +49(0)6151-727697 A32/147 Seite 1 von 1 

if +49(0)6151-7230 14 A31 /240 

Analysen befund 

Dr. Fichtner WL-ACP-80/83 

17.11.2010 

Bestimmung der exothermen Reaktion mittels DSC in Luft Atmosphare. 

DSC AC 675-10 

DSC AC 676-10 

MAFS-093 

MAFS-092 

Die Proben wurden auf einer Analysenmikrowaage (SE 2-0CE Fa. Sartorius) 

in einem Tzero Aluminium Tiegel eingewogen. Die DSC-Messungen wurden 

in Temperaturbereich der thermischen Ereignisse mit einer 

Heizgeschwindigkeit von 1 0°C/min in Luft Atmosphare durchgeftihrt. 

Thermoanalytischer Messplatz DSC Q2000 , mit Probenwechsler und 

Advantage Software Version 5.0.1 der Fa. TA Instruments. 

Tiegel: 

Messbereich: 

Heizrate: 

Atmosphare: 

Tzero AI-Tiegel 

RT- 500 oc 

10 K/min 

Luft 

Die DSC-Kurven wurden in den Ereignisbereichen mit dem Prograrnrn TAPeakrnaximum ausgewertet. 

Beide Proben zeigen starke exotherme Reaktionen (Zersetzung) im Bereich 

von ca. 260 bis 400 °C. 

C: .S I A(72 

el. 3014 

DSC AC 675,676-10 Diagramme 
Probe: MAFS-092 

GroBe: 15,0240 mg 

Methode: DSC 25-500/1 OK 

Kommentar: Luft 

0,5 0,3 

-

C) 0,1 

-

E 

0 

L... 

-

(/) 

Q) -0,1 

E 

L... 

:(U 

s 

-0,3 -0,5 

DSC 

Datei: C:\TA

Bediener: S

Versuchsda

Gerat: DSC 

j 

-0 7 i ' 40 I I I ' • • I I I I I 

140 

Exo auf 

240 

Temperatur (°C) 

340 
Probe: MAFS-093 

GroBe: 26,0240 mg 

Methode: DSC 25-500/1 OK 

Kommentar: Luft 

DSC 

Datei: C:\TA

Bediener: S

Versuchsda

Gerat: DSC 

---------------------------------------------------------

...-

C> 

.._ ~ E 

0 

.... 

........ 

(/) 

Q) 

E 

.... 

:(\l ~ 1,0 0,5 0,0 

-0,5 

229,86°C 

-1 .o 40 

140 240 340 

Exo auf Temperatur (°C)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission of the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as theChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: April 30,  2010 | By:    | /s/ Dan T. Bessey                           |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Dan T. Bessey,                              |
|                       |   | Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWestCommunications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit tothe Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.

 

----