alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70381-70382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33961]


City of Yelm, WA--Acquisition Exemption--Line of The Burlington 
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

    The City of Yelm, Washington (the City), a municipality of the 
State of Washington, a noncarrier, has filed a notice of exemption 
under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire approximately 4.57 miles of rail line 
known as the Prairie Line \1\ from The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe 
Railway Company (BNSF) between milepost 20.99 near Roy, WA, and 
milepost 25.56 near Yelm, WA, in Pierce and Thurston Counties, WA. The 
City certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this 
transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a Class III 
rail carrier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The City states that it is its intent to have the above line 
operated by a yet-to-be-determined third party rail operator. The 
City further states that the line will be temporarily embargoed 
pending line maintenance and selection of an operator in the near 
future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or shortly after 
November 16, 2000.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The City reported that it intended to consummate the 
transaction on or before November 16, 2000 (emphasis added). The 
earliest the transaction can be consummated is November 16, 2000, 
the effective date of the exemption (7 days after the exemption was 
filed). The City's representative has been notified and has 
confirmed that consummation would not take place before November 16, 
2000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33961, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Stephen L. Day, 1215--4th Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 
98161-1090.

[[Page 70382]]

    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at http://WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.

    Decided: November 15, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29731 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V046

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART I - TITLE VI — THE DEMOCRATIC LIFE OF THE UNION - Article I-46***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0034 - 0034*

Article I-46

The principle of representative democracy

1. The functioning of the Union shall be founded on representative democracy.

2. Citizens are directly represented at Union level in the European Parliament.

Member States are represented in the European Council by their Heads of State or Government and in the Council by their governments, themselves democratically accountable either to their national Parliaments, or to their citizens.

3. Every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union. Decisions shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen.

4. Political parties at European level contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union.

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29615]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

[Notice No. 908]


Availability of ATF Publication 5400.7 (Federal Explosives Law 
and Regulations--2000)

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), Department of 
the Treasury.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) is issuing 
this notice: (1) To announce the release of ATF Publication 5400.7 (09/
00), ``Federal Explosives Law and Regulations--2000'' and (2) to make 
certain technical corrections to that publication. The purpose of this 
publication is to serve as a guide to Federal explosives laws, 
regulations, and related information.

ADDRESSES: ATF P 5400.7 (09/00), ``Federal Explosives Law and 
Regulations--2000'' is available at no cost upon request from the ATF 
Distribution Center, P.O. Box 5950, Springfield, Virginia 22150-5950. 
The publication may also be viewed at ATF's web site at: http://www.atf.treas.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill O'Brien, Public Safety Branch, 
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 680 Techworld South Building, 
Washington, DC 20226 (202-927-7930).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) is pleased to 
announce the release of ATF Publication 5400.7 (09/00), ``Federal 
Explosives Law and Regulations--2000.'' The purpose of this publication 
is to serve as a guide to Federal explosives law, regulations, and 
related information. Several changes have been made to explosives laws 
and regulations since the last publication.
    In examining the completed publication, we observed two errors in 
the regulations section which need to be corrected, as follows:
    1. In 27 CFR 55.218 (Table of distances for storage of explosive 
materials), footnote 3 at the end of the table, ``11/2 lbs.'' should be 
changed to read ``1\1/2\ lbs.''; and
    2. In 27 CFR 55.223 (Table of distances between fireworks process 
buildings and other specified areas), the title heading of the table 
was omitted and should be added to read:

Distance From Passenger Railways, Public Highways, Fireworks Plant 
Buildings Used to Store Consumer Fireworks and Articles Pyrotechnic, 
Magazines and Fireworks Shipping Buildings, and Inhabited Buildings.\3 
4 5\
    In addition to the above, we wish to point out that the correct 
address of the ATF Out-of-Business Records Center is: 2029 Stonewall 
Jackson Drive, Spring Mills Office Park, Falling Waters, West Virginia 
25419. The regulations at 27 CFR 55.128 (Discontinuance of business) 
will be amended to reflect this change in a forthcoming Treasury 
decision.

    Approved: November 13, 2000.
Bradley A. Buckles,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-29615 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC., et al., 

Intervenor Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Intervenor-Plaintiff Polymer80, Inc.’s Notice Regarding Remaining 

Claims (ECF No. 232), filed July 7, 2023. On June 30, 2023, this Court vacated the Final Rule at 

issue in this case, mooting several of Polymer80’s claims. Mem. Opinion, ECF No. 227 (mooting 

Polymer80’s Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, XII, XIII in part, XIV in part, XV, XVI in part, and XVII 

in part). However, because Defendants’ other administrative actions—the promulgation of the 

Open Letter and Polymer80 Letter, which Polymer80 contends are “unlawful extensions of the 

now-vacated Final Rule”—have not been vacated, Polymer80 argues its challenges to those actions 

are not moot (Counts II, IV, VI, VIII, X, XI, XIII in part, XIV in part, XVI in part, and XVII in 

part). Notice 1–2, ECF No. 232. Polymer80 indicates its intent to seek summary judgment as to 

those non-mooted claims and proposes a scheduling order for the remainder of this litigation. Id.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS Defendants to respond to Polymer80’s notice and address 

(1) the issue of mootness as to Polymer80’s remaining claims and (2), if the Court determines 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 233 Filed 07/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4813
2

Polymer80’s claims are not moot, whether Defendants agree to the proposed scheduling order 

(ECF No. 232-1). Defendants shall respond no later than August 2, 2023. Polymer80 may reply 

no later than August 16, 2023. 

SO ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 233 Filed 07/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4814
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Hudson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered June 23, 1988, convicting him of attempted sodomy in the first degree, attempted rape in the first degree and *512sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The charge, when read as a whole, conveyed to the jury the People’s burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each and every element of the crimes charged *(see,*CPL 300.10 [2]; *People v Dengler,*109 AD2d 847). The inclusion of the language "reasonable probability” in describing an attempt did not confuse the jurors or dilute the People’s burden of proof *(see, People v Rizzo,*246 NY 334, 337; *People v Williams,*124 AD2d 615, 616).

Furthermore, we find that the sentence was neither harsh nor excessive. Mangano, P. J., Fiber, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3307]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on November 9, 2000, I find that the County and Island of Hawaii constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding beginning on October 28, 2000 and continuing through November 2, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on January 8, 2001, and for loans for economic injury until the close of business on August 9, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 13795, Sacramento, CA 95853-4795. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
7.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.687Businesses with credit available elsewhere
8.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
6.750For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 330706 and for economic injury the number is 9J4700. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: November 16, 2000. Herbert L. Mitchell, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 00-29901 Filed 11-21-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Charge Questions

Protocol Title: A Study for Measurement of Potential Dermal and Inhalation Exposure During Manual Pouring of Two Solid Formulations Containing an Antimicrobial (AEA07)

If the AEATF-II study proposal AEA07 is revised as suggested in EPA’s review and if the research is performed as described:

1. Is this research is likely to generate scient ifically reliable data, useful for assessing the exposure of those who pour solid formula tion antimicrobial pesticide products

2. Is the research likely to meet the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26, subparts K and

L?
#### Keith Walker PORTERFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22987.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1944.

A. A. Kern and Baskett & Parks, all of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of ten years.

Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal thereof. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 392 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 392

   Designating September 5, 1994, Labor Day, as ``Try American Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 1994

 Mr. Cox (for himself, Mr. Traficant, and Mr. Goodling) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post 
                        Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Designating September 5, 1994, Labor Day, as ``Try American Day''.

Whereas the creativity and ingenuity of American working men and women in the 
        United States have provided a host of new products and services which 
        improve the quality of life in the United States and the world;
Whereas American workers should be recognized as one of our Nation's most 
        valuable resources;
Whereas the American spirit of entrepreneurship, pride of craftsmanship, and 
        commitment to quality are hallmarks recognized throughout the world;
Whereas the United States and its citizens have reason to celebrate the strength 
        and quality of American products and services;
Whereas the quality and abundance of American goods are a tribute to the 
        productivity and ability of American workers;
Whereas the ability of American companies to export, even in the face of strong 
        trade barriers in many countries, is a sign of the true competitiveness 
        of American products;
Whereas American farmers and ranchers provide this country and the world with a 
        wide array of high quality food and fiber products and consistently 
        create annual agricultural trade surpluses of more than $20,000,000,000;
Whereas the energy and perseverance of American business serves as a beacon for 
        other nations that strive to ensure prosperity for their people; and
Whereas American small business provides a basis for economic progress and for 
        the creation of jobs and opportunities for people from every corner of 
        America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That September 5, 1994, Labor 
Day, is designated as ``Try American Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities and to honor the day through the purchase of American-made 
goods and services.
                                 <all>
```
#### Isidore Schild et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Schild-Adelstein Company, Respondents, *v.*Quality Furs, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 31, 1958.

*947
      *Stephen L. Hoffman*for appellant.

*Alexander Henkin*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

A triable issue was presented as to whether or not plaintiffs’ representative agreed to abide by the recommendation of the creditors’ committee or accepted the compromise plan recommended by the committee. This is a material triable issue, since proof of such agreement or acceptance would operate as a bar to plaintiffs’ recovery. Acceptance of a composition with other creditors is a valid agreement which discharges the original debt. *(White*v. *Kuntz,*107 N. Y. 518, 522; *Chemical Nat. Bank of N. Y.*v. *Kohner,*58 How. Prac. 267, revd. 85 N. Y. 189; *Heinzer*v. *Klyberg,*87 Misc. 315.)

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.
#### LIAS v. STATE.

No. 22320.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 9, 1942.

Harvey P. Shead, of Longview, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of cattle. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of three years. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
# C_2017053EN.01000501.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Celle — Germany) — Remondis GmbH & Co. KG Region Nord v Region Hannover

(Case C-51/15) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Article 4(2) TEU - Respect for the national identity of Member States inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self-government - Internal organisation of the Member States - Regional authorities - Legal instrument creating a new public-law entity and organising the transfer of powers and responsibilities for the performance of public tasks - Public procurement - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 1(2)(a) - Concept of ‘public contract’))

(2017/C 053/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Celle

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Remondis GmbH & Co. KG Region Nord

Applicant:

Defendant: Region Hannover

Defendant:

Intervening parties: Zweckverband Abfallwirtschaft Region Hannover

Intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as meaning that an agreement concluded by two regional authorities, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, on the basis of which they adopt constituent statutes forming a special-purpose association with legal personality governed by public law and transfer to that new public entity certain competences previously held by those authorities and henceforth belonging to that special-purpose association, does not constitute a ‘public contract’.

However, such a transfer of competences concerning the performance of public tasks exists only if it concerns both the responsibilities associated with the transferred competence and the powers that are the corollary thereof, so that the newly competent public authority has decision-making and financial autonomy, which it is for the referring court to verify.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
Case 3:22-cv-02188-D-BN Document 2 Filed 10/03/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1
Exhibit 35.11








ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE &
ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special
Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE24 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4..th..day of March 2016.



Daniel
Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank





Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jim G. Whitehead, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 16, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant refused to work after being told by his employer that he would be discharged if he did not work. Although the particular day in question was a religious holiday for claimant’s employer, claimant knew that it was not a holiday on which the business was closed. Claimant gave no valid reason for his refusal to work and, in fact, it was an extremely busy day. It was therefore not unreasonable for the employer to require claimant to work. As such, the conclusion that claimant’s refusal to work constituted misconduct is supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Flores [Levine],*50 AD2d 1006, 1007; *Matter of Graziose [Levine],*50 AD2d 1030).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.