alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00101-Z-BR

§

XAVIER DEWAYNE CUNNINGHAM (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

XAVIER DEWAYNE CUNNINGHAM (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 

(5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining XAVIER DEWAYNE CUNNINGHAM (1) under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that XAVIER DEWAYNE CUNNINGHAM (1) be adjudged guilty of 

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) - POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and 

have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: January 20, 2023

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00101-Z-BR Document 33 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance

Agenda 

February 18, 2021

12:30 – 12:45 pm 

12:45 – 1:15 pm 

1:15 – 1:30 pm

1:30 – 1:45 pm

1:45 – 2:00 pm

2:00 – 2:15 pm

2:15 – 2:30 pm

2:30 pm

Introduction & FIO Update 

Discussion on Market Access and the Insurance Capital Standard 

Led by the Subcommittee on FIO's International Work

Discussion of 2021 Priorities for the Subcommittee on FIO's 

International Work

Discussion of 2021 Priorities for the Subcommittee on Addressing 

the Protection Gap Through Public-Private Partnerships and Other 

Mechanisms

Discussion of 2021 Priorities for the Subcommittee on the 

Availability of Insurance Products

Discussion of 2021 Priorities for the Subcommittee on the COVID-19 

Pandemic

New Business

Adjourn
#### TRIM v. STATE.

No. 26117.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary of a .motor vehicle; the punishment, three years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

We do find, however, a motion to quash the indictment.

This is a prosecution under Article 1404b, Vernon’s Ann.Penal Code, enacted by the last Legislature.

The indictment, omitting formal parts, charges: *“ *** * did then and there unlawfully by force, threats and fraud, break and enter a motor vehicle to-wit: an automobile, there situate and occupied and controlled by William H. Porter, and with the intent then and there fraudulently to take from the said automobile corporeal personal property therein being and belonging to the said William H. Porter from the possession of the said William H. Porter, without his consent and with the intent to deprive the said William H. Porter, the owner of said corporeal personal property, of the value thereof, and to appropriate the same to the use and benefit of him, the said Frank Trim.”

We find the indictment proper under the statute.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Garcia, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), rendered April 20, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there aré no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Case 1:22-cr-00055-H-BU Document 26 Filed 10/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 49
Case 1:22-cr-00055-H-BU Document 26 Filed 10/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 50
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-507-004]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 9, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso) tendered its filing in compliance with ordering paragraphs 
(B) and (C) of the Commission's order issued October 25, 2000 at Docket 
No. RP99-507-000, et al.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29697 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets of commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         February 18, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 AM to 1:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gerald E. Calderone, PHD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rm 6150, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1340.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 2, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2912  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

## Rgt-psr:,,,,..fill§

.**F~9m:** ·'· Sent: To: Brinker, Matthew (MDOT) <BrinkerM@michigan.gov> Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:48 PM Swanson, Brian (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) Cc: chowell@flygreatlakes.com; mike.thompson@skywest.com; bob@sovereignairinc.com; Noel, Mark (MDOT); Sims, Ralph (MDOT); Hammond, Rick (MDOT); Howen, Tim; Whitmore, Brett (MDOT) Subject: RE: Soliciting Comments onEAS Proposals at Iron Mountain/Kingsford, Michigan, Brainerd and International Falls, Minnesota, and/or Rhinelander, Wisconsin - DUE August 17, 2012
Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis United States Department ofTransportation Re: USDOT Order 2012-6-9 & Docket DOT-OST-1999-5175 DearMr. DeVany: (:r

N Staffwith the Michigan Department ofTransportation- Office ofAeronautics have reviewed the proposals submitted by air carriers interested inproviding service to Ford Airport, Iron Mountain, Michigan under USDOT Order 2012-6-9. After careful consideration, we believe the proposal submittedby Skywest Airlines would best meet the transportation needs ofthe regional population servedby Ford Airport. Ourexperience with Skywest service at several Michigan Airports has been positive and the communities served by the carrierhave benefitted from the advantages ofregionaljet service. We wish to thank all the interested parties for submitting bids and we appreciate their desire to serve the citizens ofMichigan. Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 517-335-9918 or brinkerm@mi.gov. Sincerely, · Matthew V. Brinker Air Service Specialist Michigan Department ofTransportation, Office ofAeronautics

From: brian.swanson@dot.gov [mailto:brian.swanson@dot.gov] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:03AM To: jbrauer@newnorth.net; rhiarpt@newnorth.net; thowen58@hotmail.com; brosen1307@gmail.com; Brinker, Matthew (MDOT); mayor@ci.brainerd.mn.us; rick@brainerdairport.com; sabaratono@midco.net; shawnm@ci.international-falls.mn.us; bobandersonif@midco.net Cc: Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov; chowell@flygreatlakes.com; mike.thompson@skywest.com; bob@sovereignairinc.com 1
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 397 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 397

   Designating the week beginning September 12, 1994, as ``National 
                       Hispanic Business Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1994

    Mr. Torres introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week beginning September 12, 1994, as ``National 
                       Hispanic Business Week''.

Whereas the Hispanic business sector of the United States economy has 
        significantly grown in recent years, contributing significantly to the 
        strength and vitality of the economy and increasing employment 
        opportunities for the citizens of this Nation;
Whereas the number of Hispanic-owned businesses in the United States has 
        increased 150 percent since 1982, and is projected to number 585,000 by 
        the end of 1994;
Whereas sales by Hispanic-owned businesses have increased 81 percent since 1982, 
        and are expected to reach an annual high of $27,200,000,000 by the end 
        of 1994;
Whereas the number of persons employed by Hispanic-owned businesses has 
        increased 95 percent since 1982, and will exceed 375,000 by the end of 
        1994; and
Whereas the period from September 15, 1994, through October 15, 1994, has been 
        designated as Hispanic Heritage Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning 
September 12, 1994, is designated ``National Hispanic Business Week''. 
The President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling upon the people of the United States to observe the week with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities that promote a better 
understanding and awareness of--
            (1) the significant contributions which Hispanic-owned 
        businesses make to the United States economy;
            (2) the continued employment and job creation which results 
        from the growth and expansion of Hispanic-owned businesses;
            (3) the entrepreneurial spirit and strong work ethic 
        exhibited by the owners and employees of Hispanic-owned 
        businesses;
            (4) the significant gains in international trade made by 
        Hispanic-owned businesses which strongly support expanded trade 
        throughout other countries in the Americas; and
            (5) the lasting contributions made by Hispanic-owned 
        businesses to the economic vitality and social stability of 
        families, neighborhoods, and communities across the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
Case 5:22-mj-00075-BQ Document 8 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 17
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Indiana Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Indiana Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 7      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 5      | 5      | 5     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 4      | 4      | 3      | 3      | NA     | 2      | NA     | 2     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CARLOS VILLAREAL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

QUIKTRIP CORPORATION, QT 

SOUTH, LLC, QUIK'N TASTY 

FOODS, INC. & OKLAHOMA 

QUIKTRIP BEVERAGE 

CORPORATION,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action 4:22-cv-00696-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Amended Notice of Removal (ECF No. 1), filed August 

12, 2022. Upon reviewing Defendants’ filing, it appears the cause of action at issue accrued in

Denton County which lies within the Eastern District of Texas. Furthermore, it appears there is no 

connection to this district among the real parties in interest. Having received no objection from the 

parties, the Court TRANSFERS this matter to the Eastern District of Texas in the interest of 

justice. 

SO ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00696-O Document 5 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 41
#### PRIDEMORE et al. v. PRIDEMORE et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 20, 1952.

James W. Smith, Middlesboro, for .appellants.

Robert J. Watson, Middlesboro, for ap-pellees.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

This appeal questions the correctness of ■a judgment confirming an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Appellants urge that compensation should have been awarded appellee under the provisions of KRS 342.105 and not under KRS 342.-110; and that appellee was erroneously awarded medical benefits under KRS 342.-020.

 It is undisputed that appellee sustained an injury to his left leg under circumstances-creating liability upon appellant under the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act. KRS, Chap. 342. As a result of the injury the Compensation Board found that appellee suffered temporary total disability for a period of 20 *weeks,*and thereafter sustained partial permanent disability of "10 per cent to the left teg as a whole.”' The award for partial peirmanent disability was made under KRS 342.110-. The findings of fact by the Board were sup-ported by substantial evidence of probative valuje.

In cases involving permanent injury to' a member of the- body we have held that compensation should be awarded’ under KRS> 342.110', but the- total compensation awarded should not exceed that provided for the-loss of the member as- set forth in KRS 342.105. Department of Mines and Minerals v. Castle,. Ky., 240 S.W.2d 44; Knott Coal Corporation v. Kelly, 313 Ky. 562, 232 S.W.2d 994. Therefore, no error was. committed by the Board in- this respect.

The- award’ also- provided’ that ap>-pellee recover of appellant “for medical’,, hospital, and nurses expenses- incurred im connection with the- treatment of his", injury- * * *_» We-find no-error in. this: part of the award as these- benefits: are- specifica-lky-provided by KRS- 3'42’.02©l Appellant,, Row-*775fever, complains that it did not authorize appellee to undergo an operation upon his injured leg and that the charges therefor were unreasonable.

Both of these contentions were considered by the Compensation Board and sufficient reasons were given by the Board in its opinion why appellant cannot be relieved of the payment of the costs of the medical treatment that appellee received.

Judgment affirmed.
Case 4:22-cr-00044-Y Document 22 Filed 05/04/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 43
Case 4:22-cr-00044-Y Document 22 Filed 05/04/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 44
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

   The undersigned, Bami Bastani, President and Chief Executive Officer of
ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 3, 2003
                                              By: /s/ Bami Bastani
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Bami Bastani
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer





This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be
retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       17