alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69759-69760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-364-000]


Wisconsin Electric Power Company; Notice of Filing

November 13, 2000.

    Take notice that on November 3, 2000, Wisconsin Electric Power 
Company (Wisconsin Electric), tendered for filing an electric service 
agreement under its Market Rate Sales Tariff (FERC Electric Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 8) with Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC.
    Wisconsin Electric respectfully requests an effective date of 
November 1, 2000 to allow for economic transactions.
    Copies of the filing have been served on Allegheny Energy Supply 
Company, LLC, the Michigan Public Service Commission, and the Public 
Service Commission of Wisconsin.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before November 24, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the 
Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the

[[Page 69760]]

Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29593 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### PERRY v. STATE.

No. 21479.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1941.

John F. Perry, of San Antonio, for appellant.

John C. Marburger, Co. Atty., of La Grange, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with the theft of a check of the value of $15 and was assessed a penalty of six months in jail and a fine of $300, from which he appeals.

The complaint and information allege that the said R. L. Perry, on or about the 23rd day of February, 1940, “did then and there unlawfully, wilfully and fraudulently take, steal and carry away certain corporeal personal property, not his own, to-wit: a check of the value of $15.00, the same being the corporeal personal property of George H. Giesber from the possession of the said George H. Giesber without the consent of the said George H. Giesber with the intent to deprive said George H. Gies-ber of the value thereof, * *

It will be noted that there is no description of the check whatever. It does not show by whom it was drawn, its date, amount of the check, the number, nor to whom it is payable. It • merely alleges it was a check of the value of $15. The complaint and information are insufficient for lack of description. Fulshear v. State, 59 Tex.Cr.R. 376, 128 S.W. 134; Gaines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 77 S.W. 10; Calentine v. State, 50 Tex.Cr.R. 154, 94 S.W.1061, 123 Am.St.Rep. 837; Luce v. State, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 46, 224 S.W. 1095, 1097; Holland v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 384, 10 S.W.2d 561; Burns v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 328, 16 S.W.2d 538; Sasse v. State, 113 Tex.Cr.R. 513, 22 S.W.2d 941; Fuller v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 588, 37 S.W.2d 1034; 41 Tex.Jur. 117, paragraph 73. Carlton v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 537, 106 S.W.2d 279.

That the check must be sufficiently described to identify it has been so frequently considered and the reason for the conclusion so thoroughly discussed that we deem it unnecessary to further treat the subject in this opinion.

The appellant’s father, acting as his attorney, presented for filing in this court what he denominates a brief for appellant. In it he attempts to try the case in this court by statements'of his own as well as affidavits of other parties. His statements *413are directly in conflict with the record of the case and the greater part of it attempts to bring in matters not in the record and Wholly foreign to any issue in the case. Furthermore, it exhibits a studied attd planned effort to prejudice the court against the parties at interest, the officials of the county from which it' comes, and the jury which was called to service. Such effort is a reflection on the intelligence and integrity of the court and by it considered unworthy of a place in its archives. Accordingly, the same is stricken from the record and the clerk of the court is directed to withdraw therefrom his file mark as from an improper instrument and to return it to the attorney filing it.

For the defects in the complaint and information above pointed out the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause ordered dismissed.
### SERVED : DECEMBE R16 , 201 1 

## ,9Cf;ARTMt!\iro F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O

K TIIANSPORTATIO N - ,;^..';''24^^0RTATjOl v OFFIC EO FHEARING S " '"^'^''^ ^ OPEPAllCHS WASHINGTON , D C 

## • M or e i q A9 : li b F N THEMATTERO F EIBERT Y JE T MANAGEMEN T CORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-2011-100 4
NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No . 20 1 lEA I 10025 ) ha s been assigne d to Administrativ e La

w Judge.J.E . Sullivan . All futur e pleading s andothe r

communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve don th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Dockei , andth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List . •^-Riapni c A . Yoder '

Chie f Administrative-'Law Judgf e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2011-100 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Altcnlion : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC~43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1OOO '

. ON ECOP Y Ken t S . Jackson , Respomieni^' s Counse l Jackso n & Wade , L.L.C . 2162 8 Midlan dDriv e Shawnee , K S 6621 8 TEL : 913-338-170 0 FAX : 913-338-175 5 Zachar y M . Berman , Cutnplaiminl' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AEA- 7 Ixdcra l Aviatio n Administratio n On e Aviatio n Plaza , Roo m56 1 Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier, use th

e followin g address ; Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-^30 .

- 2 ^
#### WILSON v. STATE.

No. 21715.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1941.

Mort W. Muse, of McKinney, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for five days and a fine of fifty dollars.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         854,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  931,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    187,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,019,957
<PP&E>                                       1,023,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                 684,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,406,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,267,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,315
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,136,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,406,884
<SALES>                                      3,368,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,368,054
<CGS>                                        1,421,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,000,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                314,114
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            314,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   314,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		November 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R. L. Smith, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 13,
2008

| |                                               | 
| | --------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Gregory
 R. L. Smith                      | 
| |                                               | 
| | Gregory R.
 L. Smith                          | 
| | Chief
 Financial Officer                      | 
| | (principal
 financial and accounting officer) | 

---
# Official Journal L 171/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.171.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 171 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 536 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.171.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 171

English edition

Legislation

Volume 536 July 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 578/2010 of 29 June 2010 on the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009 as regards the system of granting export refunds for certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 578/2010 of 29 June 2010 on the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009 as regards the system of granting export refunds for certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### In the Matter of Carol K. Elevitch et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Joseph V. Colello, as Supervisor of the Town of Orangetown, et al., Respondents, and Helen Ostrowski et al., Respondents-Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Joseph V. Colello, the Supervisor of the Town of Orangetown, dated April 16, 1988, finding the petition for the incorporation of the proposed Village of Palisades to be legally insufficient, the petitioners appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Lange, J.), dated June 30, 1989, which denied the petition, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered August 16, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding. Helen Ostrowski cross-appeals and Arthur J. Firestone purportedly cross-appeals from the judgment.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 30, 1989, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross appeal and the purported cross appeal are dismissed *(see, Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ.,*
      *68260 NY2d 539), without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because no appeal lies therefrom as of right and, in any event, it was superseded by the judgment.

The petition for incorporation was legally insufficient in that it did not include a "complete” list of the regular inhabitants of the territory in accordance with clear statutory mandate *(see,*Village Law § 2-202 [1] [c] [2]; *Matter of Luria v Conklin,*139 AD2d 650; *Matter of Village of Viola Hills [Lempent—Conklin],*129 AD2d 579).

We have considered the respondents-appellants’ contentions that the incorporation petition was legally insufficient for two additional reasons: (1) that the description of the proposed village territory did not comply with the statute, and (2) that the proposed village territory was gerrymandered, and find both to be without merit *(see,*Village Law § 2-202 [1] [c] [1]; § 2-206; *Matter of Village of Airmont,*144 AD2d 465; *Matter of Rose v Barraud,*61 Misc 2d 377, *affd*36 AD2d 1025). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29775]



[[Page 69993]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 15, 2000.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 21, 
2000 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1143.
    Form Number: IRS Form 706-GS(D-1).
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Notification of Distribution From a Generation-Skipping 
Trust.
    Description: Form 706-GS(D-1) is used by trustees to notify the IRS 
and distributees of information needed by distributees to compute the 
Federal GST tax imposed by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 2601. 
IRS uses the information to enforce this tax and to verify that the tax 
has been properly computed.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 80,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper:

Recordkeeping--1 hr., 33 min.
Learning about the law or the form--1 hr., 48 min.
Preparing the form--42 min.
Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS--20 min.

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 348,800 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1447.
    Regulation Project Number: CO-46-94 Final.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Losses on Small Business Stock.
    Description: Records are required by the Internal Revenue Service 
to verify that the taxpayer is entitled to a section 1244 loss. The 
records will be used to determine whether the stock qualifies as 
section 1244 stock.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 10,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper: 12 minutes.
    Estimated Total Recordkeeping Burden: 2,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29775 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF FNBH BANCORP, INC.

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350):

I,
James R. McAuliffe, President and Chief Executive Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)       
The quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

(2)       
The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of FNBH Bancorp, Inc.

|Date:  February 20, 2008 |  | FNBH BANCORP, INC.By: /s/ James R. McAuliffe       
       James R. McAuliffeIts: President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FNBH Bancorp, Inc.
and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         967,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  987,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,269
<INVENTORY>                                  1,459,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,614,746
<PP&E>                                       8,327,181
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,378,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,066,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,227,951
<BONDS>                                      2,540,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,296,959
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,354,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,066,221
<SALES>                                      2,481,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,481,603
<CGS>                                        1,575,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,575,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               666,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                225,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                    88,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   137,848
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>