alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 0 0 005

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E JENNIFER GAYLE JANVIER

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Relator Jennifer Gayle Janvier f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the above

cause on January 3, 2020

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator seek s to compel the

trial court to transfer the underlying case to Victoria County, Texas based on mandatory

venue provisions found in the Texas Family Code. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN . § 155.201

.

T he Court requests that the real part y in interest

, Justin Lee Todd

, or any others whose

interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for

writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See

T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.2 IT IS SO ORDERE D.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

6 th day of January, 2020.
Message from the Secretary of the Treasury

Dear Member: 

On behalf of President Biden, it is my pleasure to submit the Department of Treasury’s budget

request for Fiscal Year 2022. This request comes during a time of four converging crises: ending

the COVID-19 pandemic, providing economic relief, tackling climate change, and advancing 

racial equity. The budget proposes investments that address each of these areas. Additionally,

the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 President’s Budget invests in the core foundations of our country’s 

strength and advances key Treasury Department priorities that will be reflected in the upcoming 

Treasury Strategic Plan for FYs 2022-2026, including ensuring that all Americans are treated 

fairly by our tax system, expanding programs that offer loans to start-ups and small businesses to 

promote affordable housing and community revitalization projects, and closing loopholes that 

allow illicit actors to evade scrutiny, mask their dealings, and shield illegal activity.

Treasury’s request includes $13.2 billion for the IRS to ensure increased oversight of highincome and corporate tax returns to ensure compliance; provide new and improved online tools 

for taxpayers to communicate with the IRS easily and quickly; and improve telephone and inperson taxpayer customer service, including outreach and assistance to underserved 

communities. In addition, the American Families Plan includes proposals to overhaul tax 

administration and provide the IRS the resources and information it needs to address tax evasion. 

All told, these reforms will generate an additional $700 billion in tax revenue over the course of 

a decade, net of the investments made.

The budget provides $330 million, an increase of 22.2 percent above the 2021 enacted level, to 

support expanding the role of Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) with the 

goal of empowering the nation’s most vulnerable communities, including many rural and Tribal 

communities. This investment builds on an unprecedented level of support for the CDFI 

industry in 2021, including more than $3 billion in direct funding, $9 billion for investments in 

CDFIs and Minority Depository Institutions (MDI), and provisions in the American Rescue Plan 

encouraging CDFI participation in the $10 billion State Small Business Credit Initiative.

The budget includes $191 million for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, $64 million 

above the 2021 enacted level, to create a database as required by statute, that tracks the 

ownership and control of certain companies and organizations and helps combat the use of

complex corporate structures to shield illegal activity.

The FY 2022 Budget includes the information required for the Annual Performance Report. I

have validated the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of the performance data in this report.

Sincerely,

Janet L. Yellen t L Y l
Case 3:22-cr-00326-L Document 352 Filed 10/31/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1042
# Official Journal L 157/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.157.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 157 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5415 June 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.157.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 157

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5415 June 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | 543/2011/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

543/2011/EU

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Minnesota Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Minnesota Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 14,300 | 14,400 | 14,300 | 14,400 | 14,400 | 14,400 | 14,000 | 14,000
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 14,000 | 15,500 | 15,500 | 15,500 | 15,500 | 17,500 | NA     | 18,900 | NA     | 19,000
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 19,000 | 17,500 | 17,500 | 17,500 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 18,000 | 19,150 | 19,150 | 19,150
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 20,500 | 20,500 | 21,000 | 21,000 | 21,000 |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
# Intro

# Core Q1-15, 17-90

# Core Perf Q16

# Core Trend Items

# Telework Remote Work Q91-91A

# Demographics

# ASI
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 187 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 187

    To designate the week of May 23, 1993, through May 29, 1993, as 
               ``International Student Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1993

 Mr. Hansen (for himself and Mr. Orton) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    To designate the week of May 23, 1993, through May 29, 1993, as 
               ``International Student Awareness Week''.

Whereas international student exchange programs provide students with an 
        enriched and improved quality of life through first-hand experience with 
        different cultures;
Whereas international student exchange programs provide fertile training ground 
        for future world leaders;
Whereas international student exchange programs make enormous strides toward 
        world peace through understanding;
Whereas international student exchange programs enrich a student's understanding 
        of the United States and its communities; and
Whereas the United States recognizes the need for an increased awareness of such 
        valuable programs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of May 23, 1993, 
through May 29, 1993, is designated as ``International Student 
Awareness Week''. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe 
the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 271

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the month of November in each of calican Indian Heritage Month’’. endar years 1993 and 1994 as ‘‘National Amer-
★

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 271

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the month of November in each of calendar

years 1993 and 1994 as ‘‘National American Indian

Heritage Month’’.

Whereas American Indians were the original inhabitants of

the lands that now constitute the United States of

America;

Whereas American Indian Governments developed the fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separation

of powers in government, and these principles form the

foundation of the United States Government today;

Whereas American Indian societies have exhibited a respect

for the finiteness of natural resources through deep respect for the earth, and these values continue to be widely held today;

Whereas American Indian people have served with valor in all

wars from Revolutionary War to the conflict in the Persian Gulf, often in a percentage well above their percentage in the population of the Nation as a whole;

Whereas American Indians have made distinct and important

contributions to America and the rest of the world in
2

HJ 271 EH1S

many fields, including agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;

Whereas American Indians deserve to be recognized for their

individual contributions to American society as artists,

sculptors, musicians, authors, poets, artisans, scientists,

and scholars;

Whereas designating the month of November in each of calendar years 1993 and 1994 to recognize the heritage and

the contributions to American society of American Indians will encourage self-esteem, pride, and self-awareness

in American Indians of all ages; and

Whereas November is traditionally the month when American

Indians have harvested their crops and is generally a

time of celebration and giving thanks: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That—

4 (1) the month of November in each of calendar

5 years 1993 and 1994 is designated as ‘‘National

6 American Indian Heritage Month’’; and

7 (2) the President is authorized and requested to

8 issue a proclamation in each of those years calling
3

HJ 271 EH1S

1 on the people of the United States to observe such

2 month with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives November 2,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James Murdakes, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ James Murdakes
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        James Murdakes
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 11, 2005



















                                       22
Small Business Lending Fund

Program Summary

Dollars in thousands

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Actual Estimated Estimated

Administration Costs

Obligations $42,539 $25,590 $25,640 

Budget Authority $54,649 $25,590 $25,640 

Outlays $33,262 $24,822 $24,871 

SBLF Program Investments Direct Loan Subsidy

Obligations $292,000 $0 $0 

Budget Authority $292,000 $0 $0 

Outlays $292,000 $0 $0 

Total Obligations $334,539 $25,590 $25,640 

Total Budget Authority $346,649 $25,590 $25,640 

Total Outlays, Net $325,262 $24,822 $24,871 

Summary and Explanation of Programs

The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Public

Law No. 111-240) (the “Act”) established the 

Small Business Lending Fund (SBLF). The 

SBLF is a program designed to increase the 

availability of credit to small businesses by 

providing capital to eligible financial

institutions with assets of less than $10 billion, 

which are an important source of credit for 

small businesses. 

In FY 2011, SBLF received 933 applications 

from institutions requesting a total of $11.8 

billion in funding, which includes 850 

applications for $11.6 billion from banks and 

thrifts and 83 applications for $160 million 

from community development loan funds 

(CDLF).

SBLF sent preliminary approval letters to 400 

applicants (349 banks and 51 CDLFs) 

requesting approximately $4.8 billion in value. 

SBLF completed transactions with 332 

institutions, which totaled $4.03 billion in 

program funding. 

Participating institutions estimate that they 

will increase their small business lending by 

more than $9 billion over the next two years. 

In addition, Treasury currently projects that 

the SBLF will generate a modest profit for 

taxpayers of approximately $80 million,

excluding administrative costs.

In FY 2012 and forward, SBLF will transition 

to a new phase, focusing on asset 

management, dividend and interest operations, 

compliance and oversight, and outreach and 

reporting. 

SBLF administrative expenses also support 

Office of Inspector General efforts to provide 

audit and investigative oversight of SBLF

Legislative Proposals

The SBLF has no legislative proposals for FY 

2013.
Description of Performance

The SBLF program office is developing a 

comprehensive set of performance measures to 

continually monitor the impact of the Fund’s 

investments and the efficiency of its 

operations. The measures address two aspects 

of program performance:

1. Efficiency Measures (to assess the 

administrative aspects of the program)

a. The completion of application 

processing and funds disbursal by the 

program deadline (The SBLF program 

b. Completed the review and funding 

of all eligible program applicants by 

the September 27, 2011 statutory 

deadline.

2. Outcome Measures (to assess the 

impact of the program on small 

business lending)

a. Total number of participating 

institutions and amount invested. 

b. Increase in small business lending 

by participating banks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,899,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,923,511
<PP&E>                                         407,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,579,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          661,504
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,637
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,880,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,579,844
<SALES>                                        118,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  392,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               739,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               978,921
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (34,812)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Herbert Sellins, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion to suppress denied and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: County Court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The warrant was issued upon probable cause. It was based upon the sworn affidavit of an identified member of the community attesting to defendant’s criminal activity which the affiant had personally observed at the defendant’s residence only a few days before the warrant was issued *(see, People v Hicks,*38 NY2d 90, 92-93). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—suppress evidence.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.
# C_2006326EN.01000802.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Koninklijke Coöperatie Cosun UA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-68/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Sugar - Article 26 of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 and Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2670/81 - Charge owing for C Sugar disposed of on the internal market - Application for remission - Equity clause laid down in Article 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 - ‘Import or export duties’ - Principles of equality and legal certainty - Equity)

(2006/C 326/17)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Koninklijke Coöperatie Cosun UA (represented by: M. Slotboom and N.J. Helder, advocaten)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis, Agent, F. Tuytschaever, advocaat)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 7 December 2004 in Case T-240/02 Koninklijke Coöperatie Cosun v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision REM/19/10 of 2 May 2002 declaring inadmissible the request for remission of import duties lodged by the Netherlands in favour of the applicant

Operative part of the Judgment

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Koninklijke Coöperatie Cosun UA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Koninklijke Coöperatie Cosun UA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 02.04.2005.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

   The undersigned, Bami Bastani, President and Chief Executive Officer of
ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  July 29, 2003
                                               By:       /s/ Bami Bastani
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Bami Bastani
                                                         President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.