Final 

Fourth Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

January 2014 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Final 

Fourth Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

January 2014

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report Page v January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

FINAL 

FOURTH QUARTER 2013 - QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 

OUTSIDE TUNNEL WELLS 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

Long-Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint-Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Commanding Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

(808) 261-0740 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number: N62742-12-D-1853 

Contract Task Order: 0002 

Approval Signature: 

 Darren Uchima, Navy Technical Representative Date 

Approval Signature: 12/27/2013 

 Robert Chong, ESI Project Manager Date 

Approval Signature: 12/27/2013 

 Iris van der Zander, ESI QA Manager Date 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report Page vi January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report Page vii January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Section Title Page

ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Site Description 1-1

1.2 Physical Settings 1-2

1.3 Background 1-3

 

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 2-1

2.1 Groundwater Sampling 2-1

2.2 Analytical Results 2-1

2.3 Waste Disposal 2-2

3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 3-1

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 3-1

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 3-4

 

4.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1

5.0 FUTURE WORK 5-1

 

6.0 REFERENCES 6-1
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report Page viii January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

LIST OF TABLES 

Number Title Page

1.1 Current Status of USTs 1-2

2.1 Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 23, 2013) 2-3

3.1 Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 23, 2013) 3-5

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES 

Number Title 

1 Site Location 

2 Site Layout 

 

 

APPENDICES 

Appendix Title 

A Groundwater Sampling Logs 

B Field Notes 

C Laboratory Reports 

D Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 

E Waste Disposal Manifest 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report Page ix January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

ACRONYMS/ 

ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITION/MEANING 

% percent 

COPC Contaminant of Potential Concern 

DLNR State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DOH State of Hawaii Department of Health 

DON Department of the Navy 

EAL Environmental Action Level 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency 

ESI Environmental Science International 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

ID Identification 

JBPHH Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

LCS Laboratory Control Sample 

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate 

LOD Limit of Detection 

LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

μg/L micrograms per liter 

MS Matrix Spike 

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate 

NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command 

NAVSUP FLC Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center 

N.D. Not Detected 

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 

PARCCS Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, Comparability, 

and Sensitivity 

pH hydrogen activity 

QC Quality Control 

RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

RPD Relative Percent Difference 

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan 

TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. 

TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline 

U.S. United States of America 

UST Underground Storage Tank 

VOC Volatile Organic Compounds 

WP Work Plan 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report Page x January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report ES-1 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of the fourth quarter 2013 groundwater 

sampling event conducted on October 23, 2013, at the outside tunnel wells of the Red Hill Bulk 

Fuel Storage Facility [RHSF], Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam [JBPHH], Hawaii. The RHSF is 

located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. There are 18 active and 2 inactive 

underground storage tanks [USTs] located at the RHSF. The State of Hawaii Department of 

Health [DOH] Facility Identification [ID] number is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 

990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Contract 

Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved 

Work Plan [WP]/Sampling and Analysis Plan [SAP] prepared by Environmental Science 

International [ESI]. 

On October 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two outside tunnel 

monitoring wells (wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01). A summary of the analytical results 

is provided below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-g (15 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.041 μg/L) were detected. The 

COPCs were not detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (170 and 200 μg/L), TPH-g (17 and 14 μg/L), and acetone (44 and 

38 μg/L) were detected in both the primary and duplicate samples. Benzene (0.17 μg/L) was 

only detected in the duplicate sample. TPH-d (170 and 200 μg/L) was detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination in the duplicate sample and for only gross contamination in the primary 

sample. 

TPH-g was detected in the method and trip blanks at concentrations of 21 and 24 μg/L, 

respectively. Because of this, it is likely that the TPH-g concentrations detected in the 

groundwater samples are all biased high. 

TPH-d was not detected in well HDMW2253-03 during this round of quarterly sampling. TPH-d 

concentrations last exceeded the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination in January 2013 (600 μg/L). Naphthalene was detected but remained at a low 

concentration, below the DOH EALs and consistent with historical results. 

With the exception of TPH-d in well OWDFMW01, groundwater contaminant concentrations 

remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d 

concentrations detected during this round of sampling were above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination (the TPH-d concentration in the duplicate sample was also above the drinking 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report ES-2 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

water EAL), but decreased significantly from the last event, and were the lowest they have been 

since July 2012. 

Based on the results of the assessment, continued groundwater monitoring at the RHSF is 

recommended. If the TPH-d concentrations significantly increase, the monitoring frequency 

should be increased to monthly, even though the two outside wells are not included in the RHSF 

Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 1-1 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of the fourth quarter 2013 groundwater 

sampling event conducted on October 23, 2013, at the outside tunnel wells of the RHSF, 

JBPHH, Hawaii. The RHSF is located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. The purpose of 

the sampling is to (1) assess the condition of groundwater beneath and in the vicinity of the 

RHSF with respect to chemical constituents associated with jet fuel propellant and marine diesel 

fuel, and (2) to ensure the Navy remains in compliance with DOH UST release response 

requirements as described in Hawaii Administrative Rules 11-281 Subchapter 7, Release 

Response Action (DOH, 2000). The DOH Facility ID number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The 

DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). 

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The RHSF is located on federal government land (zoned F1- Military and Federal), located in 

Halawa Heights, approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor (Figure 1). It is located on a 

low ridge on the western edge of the Koolau Mountain Range that divides Halawa Valley from 

Moanalua Valley. The RHSF is bordered on the north by Halawa Correctional Facility and 

private businesses, on the west by the United States of America [U.S.] Coast Guard reservation, 

on the south by residential neighborhoods, and on the east by Moanalua Valley. A quarry is 

located less than a quarter mile away to the northwest. The RHSF occupies 144 acres of land 

and the majority of the site is at an elevation of approximately 200 to 500 feet above mean sea 

level. 

The RHSF contains 18 active and 2 inactive USTs, which are operated by Naval Supply 

Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center [NAVSUP FLC] Pearl Harbor (formerly Fleet and 

Industrial Supply Center). Each UST has a capacity of approximately 12.5 million gallons. The 

RHSF is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer. The USTs contain Jet Fuel 

Propellant-5 [JP-5], Jet Fuel Propellant-8 [JP-8], and Marine Diesel Fuel [F-76]. The current 

status of each of the USTs is summarized in Table 1.1. 

Two groundwater monitoring wells (well HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01) are located outside 

of the RHSF tunnel system (Figure 2). Well HDMW2253-03 is located at the Halawa 

Correctional Facility (outside the RHSF) and well OWDFMW01 is located at the Oily Waste 

Disposal Facility near Adit 3. Five groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) are located within the RHSF lower access tunnel. 

Monitoring data for the five wells located inside the tunnel are included in a separate report. 

Monitoring wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 are located inside the 

underground tunnels. Monitoring well RHMW2254-01 is located inside the infiltration gallery of 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 1-2 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

the Department of the Navy [DON] Well 2254-01. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 

2,400 feet downgradient of the USTs and provides approximately 24 percent [%] of the potable 

water to the Pearl Harbor System, which serves approximately 52,200 military customers. 

NAVFAC Public Works Department operates the infiltration gallery and DON Well 2254-01. 

TABLE 1.1 

Current Status of the USTs 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

April 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Tank Identification Fuel Type Status Capacity 

F-1 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-2 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-3 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-4 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-5 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-6 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-7 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-8 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-9 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-10 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-11 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-12 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-13 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-14 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-15 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-16 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-17 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-18 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-19 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-20 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8

1.2 PHYSICAL SETTINGS

Climatological conditions in the area of the RHSF consist of warm to moderate temperatures 

and low to moderate rainfall. The RHSF is leeward of the prevailing northeasterly trade winds. 

The average annual precipitation is approximately 40 inches, which occurs mainly between 

November and April (State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources [DLNR], 

1986). Annual pan evaporation is approximately 75 inches (DLNR, 1985). Average 

temperatures range from the low 60’s to high 80’s (degrees Fahrenheit) (Atlas of Hawaii, 1983). 

Oahu consists of the eroded remnants of two shield volcanoes, Waianae and Koolau. The 

RHSF is located on the southwest flank of the Koolau volcanic shield. Lavas erupted during the 

shield-building phase of the volcano belong to the Koolau Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Following formation of the Koolau shield, a long period of volcanic quiescence occurred, 

during which the shield was deeply eroded. Following this erosional period, eruptive activity 

resumed. Lavas and pyroclastic material erupted during this period belong to the Honolulu 

Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 1935). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 1-3 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

In the immediate area of the RHSF, Koolau Volcanic Series lavas dominate, although there are 

consolidated and unconsolidated non-calcareous deposits in the vicinity that consist of alluvium 

generated during erosion of the Koolau volcanic shield. South-southwest of the Site, and in 

isolated exposures to the west, are pyroclastic deposits formed during eruptions from three 

Honolulu Volcanic Series vents, Salt Lake, Aliamanu, and Makalapa (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Based on established geology and records of the drilled wells (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1938), the RHSF is underlain by Koolau Volcanic Series basalts. The area of the RHSF is 

classified as Rock Land, where 25 to 90% of the land surface is covered by exposed rock and 

there are only shallow soils (Foote, et al., 1972). 

Groundwater in Hawaii exists in two principal types of aquifers. The first and most important 

type, in terms of drinking water resources, is the basal aquifer. The basal aquifer exists as a 

lens of fresh water floating on and displacing seawater within the pore spaces, fractures, and 

voids of the basalt that forms the underlying mass of each Hawaiian island. In parts of Oahu, 

groundwater in the basal aquifer is confined by the overlying caprock and is under pressure. 

Waters that flow freely to the surface from wells that tap the basal aquifer are referred to as 

artesian. 

The second type of aquifer is the caprock aquifer, which consists of various kinds of unconfined 

and semi-confined groundwater. Commonly, the caprock consists of a thick sequence of nearly 

impermeable clays, coral, and basalt, which separates the caprock aquifer from the basal 

aquifer. The impermeable nature of these materials and the artesian nature of the basal aquifer 

severely restrict the downward migration of groundwater from the upper caprock aquifer. In the 

area of the RHSF, there is no discernible caprock. 

Groundwater in the area of the RHSF is part of the Waimalu Aquifer System of the Pearl Harbor 

Aquifer Sector. The aquifer is classified as a basal, unconfined, flank-type; and is currently used 

as a drinking water source. The aquifer is considered fresh with less than 250 milligrams per 

liter of chloride and is considered an irreplaceable resource with a high vulnerability to 

contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). 

The nearest drinking water supply well is the DON Well 2254-01, located in the infiltration 

gallery within the RHSF. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of 

the USTs (Figure 2). 

1.3 BACKGROUND

The RHSF was constructed by the U.S. Government in the early 1940s. Twenty USTs and a 

series of tunnels were constructed to supply fuel to the Navy. The USTs were constructed of 

steel and they currently contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76. Several tanks in the past have stored 

DON special fuel oil, DON distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline (Environet, 2010). 

The fueling system is a self-contained underground unit that was installed into native rock 

comprised primarily of basalt with some interbedded tuffs and breccias (Environet, 2010). Each 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 1-4 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

UST measures approximately 245 feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of 

the tanks lie at depths varying between 100 feet and 200 feet below ground surface. 

In response to increasing concentrations of COPCs in the groundwater monitoring wells within 

the facility (specifically RHMW02) during the 2008 sampling events, quarterly groundwater 

monitoring was initiated in 2009 at the outside tunnel wells. 

In 2009, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW04, OWDFMW01, and 

HDMW2253-03. Samples were collected in August and October 2009. None of the COPCs 

were detected at concentrations exceeding the gross contamination or drinking water toxicity 

DOH EALs. 

 

In 2010, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW04, OWDFMW01, and 

HDMW2253-03. Samples were collected from well RHMW04 in January and April 2010. 

Samples were collected from well OWDFMW01 in January, April, and October 2010. Samples 

were collected from well HDMW2253-03 in January, April, July and October 2010. The COPCs 

concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination 

and drinking water toxicity DOH EAL in January 2010 (The Environmental Company, Inc. 

[TEC], 2010a). 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination and 

drinking water toxicity DOH EALs in January and April 2010 (TEC, 2010a; TEC, 2010b). 

In 2011, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03. 

Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October 2011. None of the COPCs were 

detected at concentrations exceeding the gross contamination or drinking water toxicity DOH 

EALs. 

In 2012, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03. 

Samples were collected in January, April, July, and November 2012. TPH-d was detected at a 

concentration above the DOH EALs in samples collected from wells HDMW2253-03 and 

OWDFMW01 (Environet, 2012; ESI, 2013a). The COPCs concentrations exceeding DOH EALs 

are summarized below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in April and November 2012. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in April 2012. 

In January 2013, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and 

HDMW2253-03 (ESI 2013b). TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs in 

samples collected from wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01. The COPCs concentrations 

exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 1-5 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in January 2013. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in January 2013. 

In April 2013, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03 

(ESI 2013c). TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs in samples collected 

from well OWDFMW01. The COPC concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized 

below. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in April 2013. 

In July 2013, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03 

(ESI 2013d). TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs in samples collected 

from well OWDFMW01. The COPC concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized 

below. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in July 2013. 

1.3.1 Previous Reports 

The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH: 

1. Groundwater Monitoring Report, August 2009 (submitted September 2009). 

2. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

3. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January, 2010 (submitted April 2010). 

4. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2010 (submitted May 2010). 

5. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2010 (submitted August 2010). 

6. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2010 (submitted December 2010). 

7. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2011 (submitted March 2011). 

8. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2011 (submitted June 2011). 

9. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2011 (submitted September 2011). 

10. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2011 (submitted December 2011). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 1-6 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

11. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2012 (submitted March 2012). 

12. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2012 (submitted July 2012). 

13. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2012 (submitted August 2012). 

14. Groundwater Monitoring Report, November 2012 (submitted January 2013). 

15. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2013 (submitted April 2013). 

16. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2013 (submitted July 2013). 

17. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2013 (submitted September 2013). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 2-1 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 2 – GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 

On October 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two monitoring wells 

(wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). The samples were collected in accordance with DOH 

UST release response requirements and the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008). 

Prior to purging and sampling, the depth to groundwater and the depth to the bottom of the wells 

were measured. Well OWDFMW01 was measured by ESI using a Geotech oil/water interface 

probe. Well HDMW2253-03 was measured by the DLNR using their Geotech oil/water interface 

probe. The measurements are included in the groundwater sampling logs. No measurable 

product, sheen, or petroleum hydrocarbon odor was observed in either well. 

2.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Prior to collecting groundwater samples, disposable bailers were used to purge groundwater 

from the monitoring wells. Wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03 were purged at rates of 0.26 

and 0.27 liters per minute, respectively. 

Water quality parameters were monitored on a periodic basis during well purging. The water 

quality parameters that were measured included hydrogen activity [pH], temperature, 

conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential. The water quality parameters 

were evaluated to demonstrate that the natural characteristics of the aquifer formation water 

were present within the monitoring well before collecting the sample. At least four readings were 

collected during the purging process. Purging was considered complete when at least three 

consecutive water quality measurements stabilized within approximately 10%. The readings 

were recorded on groundwater monitoring logs which are included in Appendix A. The field 

notes are included in Appendix B. 

When the water quality parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected from the 

wells. The disposable bailers were used to collect the groundwater samples from the monitoring 

wells. For each monitoring well, the groundwater samples were collected no more than two 

hours after purging was completed to prevent groundwater interaction with the monitoring well 

casing and atmosphere. Samples collected for dissolved lead were filtered in the field using a 

peristaltic pump and a 0.45 micron filter. 

2.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The samples were analyzed for TPH-d using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 

Method 8015M, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline [TPH-g] and Volatile Organic 

Compounds [VOCs] using EPA Method 8260B, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAHs] using 

EPA Method 8270C SIM, and dissolved lead using EPA Method 6020. The analytical results are 

summarized below and in Table 2.1. A copy of the laboratory report is included in Appendix C. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-g (15 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.041 μg/L) were detected. The 

COPCs were not detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 2-2 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (170 and 200 μg/L), TPH-g (17 and 14 μg/L), and acetone (44 and 

38 μg/L) were detected in both the primary and duplicate samples. Benzene (0.17 μg/L) was 

only detected in the duplicate sample. TPH-d (170 and 200 μg/L) was detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination in the duplicate sample and for only gross contamination in the primary 

sample. 

TPH-g was detected in the method and trip blanks at concentrations of 21 and 24 μg/L, 

respectively. Because of this, it is likely that the TPH-g concentrations detected in the 

groundwater samples are all biased high. 

2.2.1 Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

Historical groundwater contaminant concentration trends of COPCs that exceed the DOH EALs 

are presented in Appendix D. A summary of groundwater contaminant trends is provided below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was not detected during this round of quarterly sampling. TPH-d 

concentrations last exceeded the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination in January 2013 (600 μg/L). Naphthalene was detected but remained at a low 

concentration, below the DOH EALs and consistent with historical results. 

 OWDFMW01 – With the exception of TPH-d, groundwater contaminant concentrations 

remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d 

concentrations detected during this round of sampling were above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination (the TPH-d concentration in the duplicate sample was also above the drinking 

water EAL), but decreased significantly from the last event, and were the lowest they have 

been since July 2012. 

2.3 WASTE DISPOSAL

The purged groundwater and decontamination water generated during sampling of the wells 

was stored in a 55-gallon drum along with the purged water and decontamination water from the 

inside tunnel wells. The drum was stored onsite at ADIT 3. On December 11, 2013, the drum of 

water was picked up by Pacific Commercial Services, LLC and disposed at Unitek Solvent 

Services, Inc. The waste disposal manifest is included in Appendix E. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

 Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 2-3 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 2.1 

Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 23, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

October 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Method Chemical 

DOH EALs OWDFMW01 (ES043) OWDFMW01 (E

Drinking Water 

Toxicity

Gross 

Contamination Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LO

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 170 HD 50 20 15 200 HD 50 EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 17 B,J 50 30 13 14 B,J 50 EPA 8270C SIM 

Acenaphthene 370 20 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.020 N.D. U 0.2 Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.034 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.021 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.036 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.019 N.D. U 0.2 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.026 N.D. U 0.2 Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Fluorene 240 950 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 1,-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.028 N.D. U 0.2 2,-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.026 N.D. U 0.2 Naphthalene 17 21 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.030 N.D. U 0.2 Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1.0 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 5.0 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2.0 1.2 N.D. U 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 Acetone 22,000 20,000 44 ICH 20 10 6.0 38 ICH 20 Benzene 5 170 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 0.17 J 1.0 Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5.0 Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1.0 0.50 N.D. U 10 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. U 20 5.0 3.9 N.D. U 20 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1.0 Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5.0 Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.3 N.D. U 10 Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5.0 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. U, IJ 10 2.0 1.8 N.D. U, IJ 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1.0 Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 Ethylbenzene 700 30 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1.0 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U, ICH 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U, ICH 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1.0 Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.40 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. UJ 1.0 0.5 0.41 N.D. UJ 1.0 Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5.0 Toluene 1,000 40 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 1.0 Xylenes 10,000 20 N.D. U 11 1.5 0.23 N.D. U 11 

EPA 6020 Dissolved Lead 15 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1.0 

The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. B Analyte was present in the associated method blank. LOQ Limit of Quantitation DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). N.D. Not Detected DL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) Q Qualifiers EPA Environmental Protection Agency TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel ICH Initial calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte. U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than thIJ Calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte. J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. LOD Limit of Detection 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

 Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 2-4 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 3-1 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 3 – DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 

A data quality assessment, which consists of a review of the overall groundwater sample 

collection and analysis process, was performed in order to determine whether the analytical 

data generated meet the quality objectives for the project. The field Quality Control [QC] 

program consisted of standardized sample collection and management procedures, and the 

collection of field duplicate samples, matrix spike samples, and trip blank samples. The 

laboratory quality assurance program consisted of the use of standard analytical methods and 

the preparation and analyses of Matrix Spike [MS]/Matrix Spike Duplicate [MSD] samples, 

surrogate spikes, blanks, Laboratory Control Samples [LCS] and Laboratory Control Sample 

Duplicate [LCSD]. 

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 

The objective of data validation is to provide data of known quality for project decisions. Data 

quality is judged in terms of Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, 

Comparability, and Sensitivity [PARCCS]. A number of factors may affect the quality of data, 

including: sample collection methods, sample analysis methods, and adherence to established 

procedures for sample collection, preservation, management, shipment, and analysis. 

Precision 

Precision is defined as the reproducibility of replicate measurements. Precision is evaluated by 

Relative Percentage Difference [RPD] of field duplicates and laboratory LCS/LCSD or MS/MSD 

results. Field duplicate and MS/MSD samples were collected at a rate of approximately 10% of 

project samples. Field duplicates were sent to the laboratory along with the primary samples. 

The RPDs of detected analytes for the primary and field duplicate samples (ES043 and ES044) 

are provided in Table 3.1. A precision of less than 50% for duplicate pairs is required by the 

DoN Project Procedures Manual to be considered acceptable (DoN 2007). For this monitoring 

event, the RPDs for duplicate sample pairs were all within the acceptable range except for 

benzene, which was detected in duplicate sample ES044, but not in primary sample ES043. In 

sample ES044, benzene was detected at a concentration below the limit of detection [LOD] and 

approximately one order of magnitude below the DOH EALs. The result has been flagged “J” for 

estimated, indicating a reduction in precision that is to be expected with the result so close to 

the LOD. Therefore, this slight reduction in precision is unlikely to affect data usability, and the 

data precision is considered acceptable based on the sample duplicated evaluation. 

The RPD of the MS/MSD results for acetone and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane were above the 

acceptable maximum of 20%, but below 50%, an RPD recommended in the NAVFAC Project 

Procedures Manual [DON 2007]. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane was not detected during this 

sampling event and when acetone was detected, it was at concentrations three orders of 

magnitude below the EALs. Therefore, this is unlikely to affect data usability. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 3-2 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Accuracy 

Accuracy is defined as the degree of conformity of a measurement to a standard or true value. 

Accuracy is evaluated through measurement of the percent recovery of an analyte in a 

reference standard or spiked sample. Accuracy limits for surrogates, laboratory control spike, 

MS, and MSD samples are established by the individual laboratory. The acceptance criteria for 

accuracy are dependent on the analytical method and are based on historical laboratory data. 

Results for TPH-d in samples ES043 and ES044 were flagged “HD.” The laboratory indicated a 

mismatch between the calibration standard and the TPH-d chromatographic profile. Mismatches 

of this type are not uncommon. The chromatograms are not part of the standard laboratory 

package and were not reviewed by ESI. 

All of the LCS and surrogate spike recoveries for analyzed constituents were within acceptable 

percent recovery limits. The MS and/or MSD recoveries were below the control limits for 

1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane and the associated sample results may be biased low. Sample results 

for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane were flagged “UJ.” 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane was not detected in 

any of the groundwater samples. However the drinking water EAL for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 

is below the respective LODs. Based on historical results and the results of other VOCs in the 

sample; it is not likely that 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane is present at concentrations above the DOH 

EALs. 

The MS and/or MSD recoveries were above the control limits for acetone, tetrachloroethylene, 

and trichloroethylene, and the associated sample results may be biased high. None of the 

COPCs were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs, so a potential high bias should 

not affect data usability. 

All other MS/MSD recoveries were within acceptable recovery limits; therefore, the data 

accuracy for this monitoring event is considered acceptable. 

 

Representativeness 

Representativeness is the degree that data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic 

of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. 

Representativeness was achieved by conducting sampling in compliance with the sample 

collection procedures described in the WP/SAP specifically written for this project (ESI, 2012). 

Representativeness is also evaluated through the compliance with the sample holding time, 

sample preservation, and the analysis of blank samples, including method blank and trip blank 

samples. The sample holding time and sample preservation complied with the EPA criteria. For 

this sampling event, one trip blank was included in the cooler to assess contamination during 

sample transport for TPH-g and VOCs. TPH-g was detected in the trip blank (24 μg/L) and 

method blank (21 μg/L) at concentrations below the limit of detection [LOD]. TPH-g was 

detected in all field samples at concentrations below the DOH EALs. It is likely that TPH-g 

concentrations in the samples have been affected by laboratory contamination and are biased 

high; however, because the concentrations are all well below the DOH EALs, this is unlikely to 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 3-3 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

affect data usability. Therefore, the groundwater sample data are considered representative of 

the groundwater quality on site. 

Completeness 

Completeness is defined as the overall percentage of valid analytical results (including 

estimated results) compared to the total number of analytical results reported by the laboratory. 

No data were rejected for this project, and therefore the completeness goal for this project 

(90%) was successfully met. 

Comparability 

Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another 

data set. Comparability can be related to accuracy and precision because these quantities are 

measures of data reliability. Data, with acceptable precision and accuracy, are considered 

comparable if collection techniques, analytical procedures, methods and reporting are 

equivalent. For this monitoring event, the samples were collected using approaches consistent 

with those in the previous events, and the same analytical methods/procedures were used to 

measure the concentration of COPCs. Therefore, the results are considered comparable within 

this data set and with the data collected from previous sampling events. The field and laboratory 

personnel followed standard operation procedures. 

All TPH-g data through July 2010 was analyzed by EPA Method 8015; beginning in October 

2010, EPA Method 8260B was used. There was no event where both methods were used, and 

so there is no way to directly compare the results using each method and determine if one 

method produces biased results. However, there is no reason to believe that using either 

method should bias the data, and the TPH-g data for all events should be comparable. 

Between August 2009 and July 2010, naphthalene was analyzed for by both EPA Methods 

8260B and 8270C, and both results were reported. Beginning in October 2010, only results 

using EPA Method 8270C were reported. Naphthalene was not detected in any well until 

November 2012, so comparability with older results should not be a concern. However, the low 

bias associated with EPA Method 8270C must be considered when making project decisions. 

Sensitivity 

The LOQs are established by the laboratory based on the LODs or instrument detection limits, 

historical data, and EPA limits established for the methods. The LOQs for samples may require 

adjustment due to matrix interference or if high levels of target analytes necessitate dilution 

before analysis. Matrix interference and sample dilutions have the effect of increasing the 

LOQs. Laboratory LODs and LOQs for several analytes differed from the LODs and LOQs in the 

WP/SAP because the laboratory updates them quarterly. LODs and LOQs for several analytes 

were greater than the DOH EALs (as stated in the WP/SAP) and therefore it is not possible to 

determine whether the analytes are present at concentrations greater than or equal to the DOH 

EALs. As suggested by the DOH Technical Guidance Manual, the project action level will be the 

LOQ for these analytes. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 3-4 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 

The PARCCS criteria were evaluated, and with a few exceptions, all criteria were met. These 

exceptions include the exceedances of recovery criteria for MS/MSDs for several VOCs and 

PAHs. Since the surrogate recoveries and the recoveries of the VOCs and PAHs in the 

LCS/LCSD are all within recovery criteria, the MS/MSD exceendaces are not considered to 

affect the usability of the data, but may indicate some matrix heterogeneity. The data 

assessment concludes that all data generated during this event are usable for their intended 

purpose. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 3-5 Outside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 3.1 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (October 23, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

October 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs OWDFMW01 (ES043) OWDFMW01 (ES044

Drinking Water 

Toxicity

Gross 

Contamination Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LOQ 

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 170 HD 50 20 15 200 HD 50 EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 17 B,J 50 30 13 14 B,J 50 EPA 8270C SIM 

Acenaphthene 370 20 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.020 N.D. U 0.2 Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.034 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.021 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.036 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.019 N.D. U 0.2 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.026 N.D. U 0.2 Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Fluorene 240 950 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 1,-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.028 N.D. U 0.2 2,-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.026 N.D. U 0.2 Naphthalene 17 21 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.023 N.D. U 0.2 Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.030 N.D. U 0.2 Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.049 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1.0 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 5.0 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2.0 1.2 N.D. U 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 Acetone 22,000 20,000 44 ICH 20 10 6.0 38 ICH 20 Benzene 5 170 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 0.17 J 1.0 Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5.0 Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1.0 0.50 N.D. U 10 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. U 20 5.0 3.9 N.D. U 20 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1.0 Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5.0 Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.3 N.D. U 10 Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5.0 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. U, IJ 10 2.0 1.8 N.D. U, IJ 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1.0 Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 Ethylbenzene 700 30 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1.0 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U, ICH 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U, ICH 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1.0 Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.40 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5.0 Toluene 1,000 40 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 1.0 Xylenes 10,000 20 N.D. U 11 1.5 0.23 N.D. U 11 

EPA 6020 Dissolved Lead 15 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1.0 

The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

DL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) NA Both results for duplicate pair were non-detect, no REPA Environmental Protection Agency N.D. Not Detected HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. Q Qualifiers J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline LOD Limit of Detection TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the L
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 3-6 Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 4-1 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 4 – SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of groundwater sampling conducted on 

October 23, 2013, at the RHSF, JBPHH, Hawaii. The RHSF is located in Halawa Heights on 

the Island of Oahu. The DOH Facility ID number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The DOH Release 

ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil 

vapor monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The 

sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI. 

On October 23, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two monitoring 

wells (wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01). A summary of the analytical results is 

provided below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-g (15 μg/L) and naphthalene (0.041 μg/L) were detected. The 

COPCs were not detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (170 and 200 μg/L), TPH-g (17 and 14 μg/L), and acetone (44 and 

38 μg/L) were detected in both the primary and duplicate samples. Benzene (0.17 μg/L) 

was only detected in the duplicate sample. TPH-d (170 and 200 μg/L) was detected at 

concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination in the duplicate sample and for only gross contamination in the primary 

sample. 

TPH-g was detected in the method and trip blanks at concentrations of 21 and 24 μg/L, 

respectively. Because of this, it is likely that the TPH-g concentrations detected in the 

groundwater samples are all biased high. 

Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

Historical groundwater contaminant concentration trends of COPCs that exceeded the DOH 

EALs are presented in Appendix D. A summary of groundwater contaminant trends is 

provided below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was not detected during this round of quarterly sampling. TPH-d 

concentrations last exceeded the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination in January 2013 (600 μg/L). Naphthalene was detected but remained at a 

low concentration, below the DOH EALs and consistent with historical results. 

 OWDFMW01 – With the exception of TPH-d, groundwater contaminant concentrations 

remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. 

TPH-d concentrations detected during this round of sampling were above the DOH EALs 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 4-2 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination, but decreased significantly from 

the last event, and were the lowest they have been since July 2012. 

Conclusions and Recommendations 

Since the wells were last sampled (July 2013), with the exception of TPH-d in well 

OWDFMW01, groundwater contaminant concentrations remained at low concentrations and 

did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d concentrations decreased in well 

OWDFMW01, but remained above the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. TPH-d concentrations in well OWDFMW01 decreased from 470 μg/L during 

the last round of sampling to 170 μg/L during this round. TPH-d was not detected in well 

HDMW2253-03 during this event and was last detected during April 2013 (45 μg/L). 

Based on the results of the assessment, continued groundwater monitoring at the RHSF is 

recommended. If the TPH-d concentrations significantly increase, the monitoring frequency 

should be increased to monthly, even though the two outside wells are not included in the 

RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 5-1 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 5 – FUTURE WORK 

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Future work includes the first quarter 2014 groundwater monitoring which is scheduled for 

January 2014. It is anticipated that the quarterly groundwater monitoring status report will be 

submitted in March 2014. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 5-2 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 6-1 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 6 – REFERENCES 

Atlas of Hawaii, 1983, Department of Geography, University of Hawaii Press. 

DLNR, 1985, Pan Evaporation: State of Hawai’i 1894-1983: Report R74, Division of Water and 

Land Development, August 1995. 

DLNR, 1986, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii: Report R76, Division of Water and Land Development, 

June 1986. 

DOH, 2000, Hawaii Department of Health, Technical Guidance Manual for Underground 

Storage Tank Closure and Release Response, March 2000. 

DOH, 2011, Screening for Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater, Hawai'i Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, 

December 2011. 

DON, 2007, Project Procedures Manual, U.S. Navy Installation Restoration Program, NAVFAC 

Pacific, Prepared for Pacific Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC Pacific), 

February 2007. 

Environet, 2010, Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, September 2010. 

Environet, 2012, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report-Outside (Non-Tunnel Wells), Red 

Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, July 2012. 

ESI, 2012, Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, October 2012. 

ESI, 2013a, Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Outside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, January 2013. 

ESI, 2013b, First Quarter 2013 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Outside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, April 2013. 

ESI, 2013c, Second Quarter 2013 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Outside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, July 2013. 

ESI, 2013d, Third Quarter 2013 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Outside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, September 2013. 

Foote et al., 1972, Soil Survey of the Islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, and Lanai, State of 

Hawaii. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 4Q2013 Status Report 6-2 January 2014

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Mink, J. F. and Lau, L. S., 1990, Aquifer Identification and Classification for Oahu: Groundwater 

Protection Strategy for Hawaii: Water Resources Research Center Technical Report No. 179, 

February 1990. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1935, Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Island of 

Oahu, Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1938, Records of the Drilled Wells on the Island of Oahu, 

Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 4, 213 p. 

TEC, 2008, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared for 

Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, January 2008. 

TEC, 2010a, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, April 2010. 

TEC, 2010b, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, May 2010. 
FIGURES 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
KAENA POINT KAHUKU MAKAHA MAILI NANAKULI WAIANAE BARBERS POINT EWA BEACH HONOLULU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WAIKIKI DIAMOND HICKAM AFB KAPOLEI EWA MOKULEIA HALEIWA WAIMEA POINT LAIE PUNALUU KAAAWA WAIAHOLE KANEOHE BAY KANEOHE MOKAPU KAILUA WAIMANALO MAKAPUU POINT HAWAII KAHALA KAI HONOLULU WAHIAWA SCHOFIELD BARRACKS PEARL CITY 83 930 803 99 80 780 83 61 63 78 72 61 83 836 76 63 780 93 930 750 99 H3 H1 H1 H1 H2 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

LAWA 

ONAL 

ILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 

GRAPHIC SCALE 900 0 900 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
RHMW05 RHMW04 HDMW2253-03 SVMP04 SVMP06 SVMP12 SVMP14 SVMP16 SVMP18 SVMP20 SVMP17 SVMP15 SVMP11 SVMP09 SVMP07 SVMP05 SVMP03 RHMW03 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY SVMP13 SVMP08 HALAWA 

CTIONAL 

ACILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE 

RHMW01 SVMP02 RHMW02 SVMP10 

GRAPHIC SCALE 1,200 0 1,200 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HALAWA STREAM BUILDING ROAD ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK WATER TANK SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED INSIDE TUNNEL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED OUTSIDE TUNNEL BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY PUMP STATION LEGEND SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files FIGURE 2 SITE LAYOUT GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX A 

Groundwater Sampling Logs 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

16 - 40ml VOAs, 6 - 1L amber jar, 4 - 500ml amber jar, 4 - 500ml HDPE

10/23/2013 1200

Disposable Hand Bailer

Triple Rinsed

YSI did not have salinity parameter

Branden Ibara, Jeff Hattemer

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

lead - 6020

ES034, ES034 MS/MSD [0745]; ES035 [0830]

Clear

Low

White Particles

-154.0

-170.8

-181.2

-180.0

-190.8

- -179.4

23.41 -

-

-

-

-

23.63

23.84

23.81

23.51

23.47

2.13

1.45

2.00

2.04

2.40

2.27

3.230

3.229

3.249

3.254

0.0 L

1.0 L

2.0 L

3.0 L

4.0 L

5.0 L

720

723

727

731

121.96 ft 0.26 L/min

5.0 L

-

712

715

9.69

11.03

3.042

3.185

Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

11.12

11.11

11.18

11.13

145.10 ft

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l)

Branden Ibara, Jeff Hattemer

Sunny, Hot

Disposable Hand Bailer

Temperature

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

120.74 ft Date: 10/23/2013 710

OWDFMW01

Appendix A Outside
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

10/23/2013 1200

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

lead - 6020

ES036 [0930]

Triple Rinsed

YSI did not have salinity parameter. Brake in bailing occurred between 0L and 1L because DLNR personal 

Branden Ibara, Jeff Hattemer

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

went back to office to retrieve reel to retrieve diver from well.

Tan

Low

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Disposable Hand Bailer

1014 4.0 L 6.75 0.491 2.73 22.37 - -131.2

- -149.6

1009 3.0 L 6.76 0.490 2.71 22.39 - -128.3

1004 2.0 L 6.84 0.792 1.66 22.40

- -140.7

959 1.0 L 7.04 0.495 2.48 22.69 - -147.4

906 0.0 L 8.07 0.576 3.23 23.02

- 0.27 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

1575 ft Branden Ibara, Jeff Hattemer

- Sunny, Hot

- Disposable Hand Bailer

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

- Date: 10/23/2013 900

HDMW2253-03

Appendix A Outside
APPENDIX B 

Field Notes 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX C 

Laboratory Reports 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
WORK ORDER NUMBER: 13-10-1893

Analytical Report For

Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Attention: Robert Chong

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Approved for release on by:

Richard Villafania

Project Manager

AIR SOIL WATER MARINE CHEMISTRY

Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (Calscience) certifies that the test results provided in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which

accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in the case narrative. The original report of subcontracted analyses, if any,

is attached to this report. The results in this report are limited to the sample(s) tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. The client or

recipient of this report is specifically prohibited from making material changes to said report and, to the extent that such changes are made, Calscience is not

responsible, legally or otherwise. The client or recipient agrees to indemnify Calscience for any defense to any litigation which may arise.

10/31/2013

Page 1 of 36
Contents

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Work Order Number: 13-10-1893

1 Work Order Narrative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2 Client Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.1 EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2 EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.3 EPA 8270C SIM PAHs (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

2.4 GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics (Aqueous). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3 Quality Control Sample Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3.1 MS/MSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3.2 PDS/PDSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

3.3 LCS/LCSD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

4 Sample Analysis Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

5 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

6 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

Page 2 of 36
Condition Upon Receipt:

Samples were received under Chain of Custody (COC) on 10/25/13. They were assigned to Work Order 13-10-1893.

Unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receiving forms all samples were received in good condition and within the

recommended EPA temperature criteria for the methods noted on the COC. The COC and Sample Receiving Documents are

integral elements of the analytical report and are presented at the back of the report.

Holding Times:

All samples were analyzed within prescribed holding times (HT) and/or in accordance with the Calscience Sample Acceptance

Policy unless otherwise noted in the analytical report and/or comprehensive case narrative, if required.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15

minutes (40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being

received outside of the stated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time.

Quality Control:

All quality control parameters (QC) were within established control limits except where noted in the QC summary forms or

described further within this report.

Additional Comments:

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC

results are always reported on a wet weight basis.

Subcontractor Information:

Unless otherwise noted below (or on the subcontract form), no samples were subcontracted.

Work Order Narrative

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-10-1893 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 3 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES043 13-10-1893-2-H 10/23/13

07:45

Aqueous GC 46 10/28/13 10/29/13

08:31

131028B12

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 170 15 20 50 1 HD

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 82 51-141

ES044 13-10-1893-3-H 10/23/13

08:30

Aqueous GC 46 10/28/13 10/29/13

08:48

131028B12

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 200 15 20 50 1 HD

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 90 51-141

ES045 13-10-1893-4-H 10/23/13

09:30

Aqueous GC 46 10/28/13 10/29/13

09:05

131028B12

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

- TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel <20 15 20 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 84 51-141

Method Blank 099-15-516-65 N/A Aqueous GC 46 10/28/13 10/29/13

06:36

131028B12

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel <20 15 20 50 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

n-Octacosane 77 51-141

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 4 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES043 13-10-1893-2-G 10/23/13

07:45

Aqueous ICP/MS 04 10/25/13 10/26/13

04:41

131025L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

ES044 13-10-1893-3-G 10/23/13

08:30

Aqueous ICP/MS 04 10/25/13 10/26/13

04:44

131025L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

ES045 13-10-1893-4-G 10/23/13

09:30

Aqueous ICP/MS 04 10/25/13 10/26/13

04:48

131025L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

Method Blank 099-14-497-47 N/A Aqueous ICP/MS 04 10/25/13 10/26/13

04:08

131025L03D

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Lead <0.200 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 5 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES043 13-10-1893-2-I 10/23/13

07:45

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 10/25/13 10/28/13

15:42

131025L05

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene <0.049 0.023 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.049 0.026 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.049 0.028 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Acenaphthylene <0.049 0.018 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Acenaphthene <0.049 0.020 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Fluorene <0.049 0.024 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Phenanthrene <0.049 0.030 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Anthracene <0.049 0.034 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Fluoranthene <0.049 0.027 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Pyrene <0.049 0.024 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.049 0.023 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Chrysene <0.049 0.019 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.049 0.023 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.049 0.025 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.049 0.036 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.049 0.022 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.049 0.026 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.049 0.021 0.049 0.20 0.985 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 76 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 71 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 85 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of4

Return to Contents

Page 6 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES044 13-10-1893-3-I 10/23/13

08:30

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 10/25/13 10/28/13

16:05

131025L05

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene <0.049 0.023 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.049 0.026 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.049 0.028 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Acenaphthylene <0.049 0.018 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Acenaphthene <0.049 0.020 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Fluorene <0.049 0.024 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Phenanthrene <0.049 0.030 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Anthracene <0.049 0.033 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Fluoranthene <0.049 0.027 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Pyrene <0.049 0.024 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.049 0.023 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Chrysene <0.049 0.019 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.049 0.023 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.049 0.024 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.049 0.036 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.049 0.022 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.049 0.026 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.049 0.021 0.049 0.20 0.98 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 77 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 71 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 84 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of4

Return to Contents

Page 7 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES045 13-10-1893-4-I 10/23/13

09:30

Aqueous GC/MS AAA 10/25/13 10/28/13

16:28

131025L05

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene 0.041 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 J

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthene <0.050 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluorene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 80 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 74 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 87 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of4

Return to Contents

Page 8 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

Method Blank 099-15-148-20 N/A Aqueous GC/MS AAA 10/25/13 10/28/13

14:08

131025L05

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Naphthalene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 U

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 U

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthylene <0.050 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 U

Acenaphthene <0.050 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluorene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Phenanthrene <0.050 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 U

Anthracene <0.050 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 U

Fluoranthene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Pyrene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 U

Chrysene <0.050 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 U

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 U

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 U

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Nitrobenzene-d5 70 28-139

2-Fluorobiphenyl 72 33-144

p-Terphenyl-d14 79 23-160

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of4

Return to Contents

Page 9 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES TRIP 13-10-1893-1-A 10/23/13

07:00

Aqueous GC/MS LL 10/26/13 10/26/13

19:13

131026L01

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U,ICH

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U,ICH

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U,IJ

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of10

Return to Contents

Page 10 of 36
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 24 13 30 50 1 B,J

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 114 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 114 80-134

Toluene-d8 97 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 98 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 89 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of10

Return to Contents

Page 11 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES043 13-10-1893-2-A 10/23/13

07:45

Aqueous GC/MS LL 10/26/13 10/26/13

19:40

131026L01

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone 44 6.0 10 20 1 ICH

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U,ICH

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U,IJ

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of10

Return to Contents

Page 12 of 36
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 17 13 30 50 1 B,J

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 100 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 104 80-134

Toluene-d8 99 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 100 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 87 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of10

Return to Contents

Page 13 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES044 13-10-1893-3-A 10/23/13

08:30

Aqueous GC/MS LL 10/26/13 10/26/13

21:28

131026L01

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone 38 6.0 10 20 1 ICH

Benzene 0.17 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 J

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U,ICH

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U,IJ

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 5 of10

Return to Contents

Page 14 of 36
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 14 13 30 50 1 B,J

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 100 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 102 80-134

Toluene-d8 96 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 97 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 86 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 6 of10

Return to Contents

Page 15 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

ES045 13-10-1893-4-A 10/23/13

09:30

Aqueous GC/MS LL 10/26/13 10/26/13

21:55

131026L01

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U,ICH

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U,ICH

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U,IJ

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 7 of10

Return to Contents

Page 16 of 36
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 15 13 30 50 1 B,J

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 105 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 104 80-134

Toluene-d8 98 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 98 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 87 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 8 of10

Return to Contents

Page 17 of 36
Client Sample Number Lab Sample

Number

Date/Time

Collected

Matrix Instrument Date

Prepared

Date/Time

Analyzed

QC Batch ID

Method Blank 099-13-057-27 N/A Aqueous GC/MS LL 10/26/13 10/26/13

14:17

131026L01

Comment(s): - Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

Acetone <10 6.0 10 20 1 U

Benzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 U

Bromoform <1.0 0.50 1.0 10 1 U

Bromomethane <5.0 3.9 5.0 20 1 U

2-Butanone <5.0 2.2 5.0 10 1 U

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Chlorobenzene <0.50 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloroethane <5.0 2.3 5.0 10 1 U

Chloroform <0.50 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 U

Chloromethane <2.0 1.8 2.0 10 1 U

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 1.2 2.0 10 1 U

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 U

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 U

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 U

Ethylbenzene <0.50 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methylene Chloride <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 4.4 5.0 10 1 U

Styrene <0.50 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 U

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 U

Toluene <0.50 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 U

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 U

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 U

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 9 of10

Return to Contents

Page 18 of 36
Parameter Result DL LOD LOQ DF Qualifiers

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 U

Trichloroethene <0.50 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 U

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 U

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 U

p/m-Xylene <1.0 0.30 1.0 10 1 U

o-Xylene <0.50 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 U

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 U

Gasoline Range Organics 21 13 30 50 1 J

Surrogate Rec. (%) Control Limits Qualifiers

Dibromofluoromethane 100 80-126

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 97 80-134

Toluene-d8 98 80-120

Toluene-d8-TPPH 98 88-112

1,4-Bromofluorobenzene 90 80-120

Analytical Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Units: ug/L

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 10 of10

Return to Contents

Page 19 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES043 Aqueous GC 46 10/28/13 10/29/13 07:25 131028S12

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 167.4 4000 4384 105 4150 100 55-133 5 0-30

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 20 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES043 Aqueous ICP/MS 04 10/25/13 10/26/13 04:18 131025S03

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 105.0 105 110.0 110 80-120 5 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 21 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES043 Aqueous GC/MS AAA 10/25/13 10/28/13 19:12 131025S05

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Naphthalene ND 2.000 1.660 83 1.636 82 21-133 1 0-25

2-Methylnaphthalene ND 2.000 1.801 90 1.739 87 21-140 3 0-25

1-Methylnaphthalene ND 2.000 1.618 81 1.576 79 20-140 3 0-25

Acenaphthylene ND 2.000 1.533 77 1.535 77 33-145 0 0-25

Acenaphthene ND 2.000 1.476 74 1.476 74 49-121 0 0-25

Fluorene ND 2.000 1.582 79 1.567 78 59-121 1 0-25

Phenanthrene ND 2.000 1.494 75 1.472 74 54-120 1 0-25

Anthracene ND 2.000 1.298 65 1.286 64 27-133 1 0-25

Fluoranthene ND 2.000 1.610 80 1.593 80 26-137 1 0-25

Pyrene ND 2.000 1.439 72 1.419 71 18-168 1 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene ND 2.000 1.511 76 1.480 74 33-143 2 0-25

Chrysene ND 2.000 1.327 66 1.307 65 17-168 1 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 1.616 81 1.501 75 24-159 7 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 1.470 73 1.542 77 24-159 5 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 2.000 1.635 82 1.617 81 17-163 1 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 2.000 1.584 79 1.570 79 10-171 1 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND 2.000 1.375 69 1.362 68 10-219 1 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 2.000 1.142 57 1.122 56 10-227 2 0-25

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 22 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed MS/MSD Batch Number

ES043 Aqueous GC/MS LL 10/26/13 10/26/13 20:07 131026S02

Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Acetone 43.53 50.00 145.0 203 204.7 322 40-140 34 0-20 3,4

Benzene ND 50.00 47.54 95 43.23 86 80-120 9 0-20

Bromodichloromethane ND 50.00 46.88 94 43.41 87 75-120 8 0-20

Bromoform ND 50.00 49.11 98 45.86 92 70-130 7 0-20

Bromomethane ND 50.00 55.71 111 51.36 103 30-145 8 0-20

2-Butanone ND 50.00 57.88 116 53.08 106 30-150 9 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 49.98 100 45.05 90 65-140 10 0-20

Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 45.86 92 42.14 84 80-120 8 0-20

Chloroethane ND 50.00 47.66 95 43.21 86 60-135 10 0-20

Chloroform ND 50.00 50.13 100 45.55 91 65-135 10 0-20

Chloromethane ND 50.00 40.56 81 39.56 79 40-125 2 0-20

Dibromochloromethane ND 50.00 50.89 102 46.09 92 60-135 10 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 50.00 43.97 88 41.13 82 50-130 7 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 50.40 101 45.04 90 80-120 11 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 48.30 97 43.80 88 70-120 10 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 46.19 92 42.52 85 75-125 8 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 46.72 93 43.18 86 75-125 8 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 52.67 105 47.29 95 70-135 11 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 49.82 100 46.41 93 70-130 7 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 50.09 100 46.19 92 70-130 8 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 48.26 97 44.60 89 70-125 8 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 49.15 98 45.06 90 60-140 9 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 47.03 94 42.92 86 75-125 9 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 53.83 108 49.65 99 70-130 8 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 42.46 85 39.53 79 55-140 7 0-20

Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 54.85 110 48.93 98 75-125 11 0-20

Methylene Chloride ND 50.00 53.29 107 47.71 95 55-140 11 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 50.00 48.13 96 46.08 92 60-135 4 0-20

Styrene ND 50.00 51.22 102 46.90 94 65-135 9 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 50.13 100 44.77 90 80-130 11 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 1.149 2 0.9227 2 65-130 22 0-20 3,4

Tetrachloroethene ND 50.00 86.60 173 78.03 156 45-150 10 0-20 3

Toluene ND 50.00 53.04 106 47.64 95 75-120 11 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.00 47.77 96 45.07 90 65-135 6 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 51.58 103 45.76 92 65-130 12 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene ND 50.00 47.04 94 43.61 87 50-140 8 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 44.40 89 39.64 79 75-125 11 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 23 of 36
Parameter Sample

Conc.

Spike

Added

MS

Conc.

MS

%Rec.

MSD

Conc.

MSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Trichloroethene ND 50.00 90.08 180 81.87 164 70-125 10 0-20 3

1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.00 50.56 101 44.91 90 75-125 12 0-20

Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 46.70 93 43.16 86 50-145 8 0-20

p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 113.3 113 102.9 103 75-130 10 0-20

o-Xylene ND 50.00 55.89 112 50.75 101 80-120 10 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 50.32 101 47.66 95 65-125 5 0-20

Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 5 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 24 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed PDS/PDSD Batch Number

ES043 Aqueous ICP/MS 04 10/25/13 00:00 10/26/13 04:31 131025S03

Parameter Sample Conc. Spike Added PDS Conc. PDS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 105.8 106 75-125

Quality Control - PDS/PDSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of1

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 25 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS/LCSD Batch Number

099-15-516-65 Aqueous GC 46 10/28/13 10/29/13 06:52 131028B12

Parameter Spike

Added

LCS

Conc.

LCS

%Rec.

LCSD

Conc.

LCSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

TPH as Diesel 4000 3785 95 3983 100 60-132 5 0-11

Quality Control - LCS/LCSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 1 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 26 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

099-14-497-47 Aqueous ICP/MS 04 10/26/13 04:15 131025L03D

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Lead 100.0 100.8 101 80-120

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 2 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 27 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed LCS Batch Number

099-15-148-20 Aqueous GC/MS AAA 10/28/13 14:32 131025L05

Parameter Spike Added Conc. Recovered LCS %Rec. %Rec. CL Qualifiers

Naphthalene 2.000 1.639 82 21-133

2-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 1.795 90 21-140

1-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 1.668 83 20-140

Acenaphthylene 2.000 1.507 75 33-145

Acenaphthene 2.000 1.504 75 55-121

Fluorene 2.000 1.553 78 59-121

Phenanthrene 2.000 1.505 75 54-120

Anthracene 2.000 1.380 69 27-133

Fluoranthene 2.000 1.601 80 26-137

Pyrene 2.000 1.482 74 45-129

Benzo (a) Anthracene 2.000 1.486 74 33-143

Chrysene 2.000 1.398 70 17-168

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 2.000 1.609 80 24-159

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 2.000 1.454 73 24-159

Benzo (a) Pyrene 2.000 1.522 76 17-163

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene 2.000 1.469 73 25-175

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 2.000 1.259 63 25-175

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene 2.000 1.104 55 25-157

Quality Control - LCS

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 3 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 28 of 36
Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Prepared Date Analyzed LCS/LCSD Batch Number

099-13-057-27 Aqueous GC/MS LL 10/26/13 10/26/13 12:55 131026L01

Parameter Spike

Added

LCS

Conc.

LCS

%Rec.

LCSD

Conc.

LCSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Acetone 50.00 64.44 129 N/A N/A 40-140 N/A 0-20

Benzene 50.00 43.29 87 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

Bromodichloromethane 50.00 43.40 87 N/A N/A 75-120 N/A 0-20

Bromoform 50.00 46.58 93 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

Bromomethane 50.00 52.24 104 N/A N/A 30-145 N/A 0-20

2-Butanone 50.00 53.70 107 N/A N/A 30-150 N/A 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 44.68 89 N/A N/A 65-140 N/A 0-20

Chlorobenzene 50.00 41.74 83 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

Chloroethane 50.00 42.64 85 N/A N/A 60-135 N/A 0-20

Chloroform 50.00 44.47 89 N/A N/A 65-135 N/A 0-20

Chloromethane 50.00 37.91 76 N/A N/A 40-125 N/A 0-20

Dibromochloromethane 50.00 45.85 92 N/A N/A 60-135 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.00 47.48 95 N/A N/A 50-130 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 43.52 87 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 43.54 87 N/A N/A 70-120 N/A 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 44.16 88 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 44.28 89 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane 50.00 46.99 94 N/A N/A 70-135 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 43.84 88 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene 50.00 41.87 84 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 45.17 90 N/A N/A 70-125 N/A 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 43.39 87 N/A N/A 60-140 N/A 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane 50.00 43.00 86 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 52.08 104 N/A N/A 70-130 N/A 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 40.53 81 N/A N/A 55-140 N/A 0-20

Ethylbenzene 50.00 49.12 98 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

Methylene Chloride 50.00 46.60 93 N/A N/A 55-140 N/A 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 50.00 48.20 96 N/A N/A 60-135 N/A 0-20

Styrene 50.00 45.75 92 N/A N/A 65-135 N/A 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 45.15 90 N/A N/A 80-130 N/A 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 42.63 85 N/A N/A 65-130 N/A 0-20

Tetrachloroethene 50.00 46.11 92 N/A N/A 45-150 N/A 0-20

Toluene 50.00 47.22 94 N/A N/A 75-120 N/A 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.00 48.26 97 N/A N/A 65-135 N/A 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.00 45.68 91 N/A N/A 65-130 N/A 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 50.00 44.51 89 N/A N/A 50-140 N/A 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.00 45.53 91 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

Quality Control - LCS/LCSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 4 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 29 of 36
Parameter Spike

Added

LCS

Conc.

LCS

%Rec.

LCSD

Conc.

LCSD

%Rec.

%Rec. CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

Trichloroethene 50.00 45.17 90 N/A N/A 70-125 N/A 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.00 43.40 87 N/A N/A 75-125 N/A 0-20

Vinyl Chloride 50.00 43.84 88 N/A N/A 50-145 N/A 0-20

p/m-Xylene 100.0 99.58 100 N/A N/A 75-130 N/A 0-20

o-Xylene 50.00 49.39 99 N/A N/A 80-120 N/A 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 46.52 93 N/A N/A 65-125 N/A 0-20

Gasoline Range Organics 1000 1058 106 1093 109 80-120 3 0-20

Quality Control - LCS/LCSD

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Date Received: 10/25/13

Work Order: 13-10-1893

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

Project: Red Hill LTM 112066 Page 5 of5

 RPD: Relative Percent Difference. CL: Control Limits

Return to Contents

Page 30 of 36
Method Extraction Chemist ID Instrument Analytical Location

EPA 6020 EPA 3020A Total 598 ICP/MS 04 1

EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 847 GC 46 1

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs EPA 3510C 773 GC/MS AAA 1

GC/MS / EPA 8260B EPA 5030C 486 GC/MS LL 2

Sample Analysis Summary Report

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-10-1893 Page 1 of1

 Location 1: 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841

 Location 2: 7445 Lampson Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92841

Return to Contents

Page 31 of 36
Qualifiers Definition

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

1 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample data was reported without further

clarification.

2 Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate spike compound was

in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

3 Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to suspected matrix interference. The

associated LCS recovery was in control.

4 The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

5 The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to suspected matrix interference.

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

BV Sample received after holding time expired.

DL The Detection Limit (DL) is the smallest analyte concentration that can be demonstrated to be different from zero or a blank concentration at

the 99% level of confidence.

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

ICH Initial calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

ICJ Initial calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

IH Calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

IJ Calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated.

JA Analyte positively identified but quantitation is an estimate.

LOD The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present in a sample in order to be

detected at 99% confidence level.

LOQ The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of a substance that produces a quantitative result within specified limits of

precision and bias.

Q Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike

concentration by a factor of four or greater.

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

U Undetected at Detection Limit (DL) and is reported as less than the Limit of Detection (LOD).

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for % moisture. All QC results are

reported on a wet weight basis.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze immediately" with a holding time of <= 15 minutes

(40CFR-136.3 Table II, footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and the reported results will be qualified as being received outside of the

stated holding time unless received at the laboratory within 15 minutes of the collection time.

A calculated total result (Example: Total Pesticides) is the summation of each component concentration and/or, if "J" flags are reported,

estimated concentration. Component concentrations showing not detected (ND) are summed into the calculated total result as zero

concentrations.

Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 • TEL: (714) 895-5494 • FAX: (714) 894-7501

Work Order: 13-10-1893 Page 1 of1

Return to Contents

Page 32 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 33 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 34 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 35 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 36 of 36
APPENDIX D 

Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

200400600800

100012001400160018002000220024002600

8/4/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/26/2010

10/21/2010

10/21/2010

1/21/2011

1/21/2011

4/21/2011

4/21/2011

7/21/2011

7/21/2011

10/26/2011

10/26/2011

1/24/2012

1/24/2012

4/26/2012

7/19/2012

11/7/2012

1/30/2013

4/24/2013

7/24/2013

10/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for OWDFMW01

DOH EAL GrDOH EAL DrTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

50

100150200250300350400450500550600650

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/26/2010

7/8/2010

10/21/2010

1/21/2011

4/21/2011

7/21/2011

10/26/2011

1/24/2012

4/26/2012

7/19/2012

11/7/2012

1/30/2013

4/24/2013

7/24/2013

10/23/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for HDMW2253‐03

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DrTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX E 

Waste Disposal Manifest 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.