alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29698]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2305-016]


Sabine River Authority of TX & LA; Notice of Public Meeting

November 15, 2000.
    a. Date and Time of Meeting: December 5, 2000; Session I 8:30 am to 
12 pm; Session II 1:30 pm to 5 pm.
    b. Place: Landmark Hotel, 3080 Colony Blvd., Leesville, LA 71446, 
1-800-246-6926 or (337) 239-7571.
    c. FERC Contacts: Frank Calcagno (Session I) (202) 219-2741; e-mail 
address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcfaceddd2d792ffddd0dfdddbd2d3fcdad9cedf92dad9d892c9cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7f1c5d6d9dc99f4d6dbd4d6d0d9d8f7d1d2c5d499d1d2d399c2c4">[email protected]</span></a>, Jon Cofrancesco (Session II) (202) 
219-0079; e-mail address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#551f3a3b7b163a3327343b363026363a15333027367b3330317b2026"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="450f2a2b6b062a2337242b262036262a05232037266b2320216b3036">[email protected]</span></a>.
    d. Purpose of the Meeting: The Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, will hold a public meeting on the above date to discuss: 
(1) Session I--the coordination of the Toledo Bend Project's (FERC No. 
P-2305) Emergency Action Plan (EAP); and (2) Session II--the possible 
options for the resolution of a request filed with the FERC to raise 
the required minimum reservoir level for the Toledo Bend Project.
    e. Proposed Agenda:
Session I
A. Opening Remarks--FERC
B. Description of proposed Project Facilities and Flood Notification 
Flow Chart--Sabine River Authority
C. Emergency Management Agency Role in Flood Flow Notification:
    1. State of Texas Emergency Management
    2. State of Louisiana Emergency Management
    3. Comments from other state and local emergency response agencies
D. Public Questions and Comments
Session II
A. Introduction
    1. Discuss meeting purpose and format
    2. Background of Issue
B. Roles of FERC and Sabine River Authority in the Toledo Bend Project
C. Discuss collaborative and license reopener processes
D. Comments from meeting participants
E. Discuss follow-up actions
    f. All local, state, and Federal agencies, Indian Tribes, and 
interested parties, are hereby invited to attend this meeting as 
participants.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29698 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Andy Teng, Chief Executive Officer of Northgate Innovations, Inc., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northgate  Innovations,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our s to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003

        /s/ Andy Teng
        -------------------------------------
        Andy Teng
        Chief Executive Officer and Acting CFO
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 179

Designating June 7, 1993, through June 14, 1993, as ‘‘National Flag

Celebration Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1993

Mr. MCCLOSKEY (for himself, Mr. APPLEGATE, Mr. BARLOW, Mr. BILBRAY,

Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. COLEMAN, Ms.

DANNER, Mr. DE LA GARZA, Mr. FROST, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas,

Mr. HAMILTON, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. KASICH, Mr. KLEIN, Mr. KOPETSKI, Mr. LANCASTER, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. MORAN, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. NEAL of

North Carolina, Mr. PARKER, Mr. PETERSON of Florida, Mr. RAHALL,

Mr. RANGEL, Mr. SHARP, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. VOLKMER, and Mr. WILSON)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating June 7, 1993, through June 14, 1993, as

‘‘National Flag Celebration Week’’.

Whereas it is the obligation of each generation of Americans

to instruct the next in the significance of our history and

of the meaning of and the ideals embodied in our Nation’s patriotic symbols;
2

•HJ 179 IH

Whereas the flag of the United States is the principal patriotic symbol of our Nation;

Whereas the citizens of the United States already celebrate

the observance of Flag Day on June the fourteenth of

each year; and

Whereas Public Law 89–443 did establish on June 9, 1966,

that ‘‘the President is authorized and requested to issue

annually a proclamation designating the week in which

June 14 occurs as National Flag Week, and calling upon

all citizens to display the flag of the United States on

those days’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President revive this custom by declaring the

4 week beginning June 7, 1993, which culminates with the

5 observance of Flag Day, on June 14, 1993, to be ‘‘Na6 tional Flag Celebration Week’’, during which citizens, es7 pecially children, be encouraged to both display the flag

8 and study its history and the ideals it represents.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1998<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-06-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-06-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          65,912
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,483
<PP&E>                                          81,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,338
<BONDS>                                            654
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,864
<SALES>                                         95,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,477
<CGS>                                           67,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,456)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,815)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,758
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
<FN>
<F1>Filed due to a change in financial reporting year end to the Sunday
nearest to December 31 of each year. Previously the fiscal year ended
the Sunday nearest December 1.
<F2>Reflects Basic EPS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CRYSTAL NEWSOM,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-CV-0499-P

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

ORDER

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, 

and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case. ECF No. 25. No objections 

were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The undersigned United States District Judge reviewed the 

proposed FCR for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District 

Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. 

The Court therefore ADOPTS the reasoning in the Magistrate 

Judge’s FCR (ECF No. 25) and AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s Decision. 

SO ORDERED on this 8th day of September 2023.

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 27 Filed 09/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2233
|Exhibit 32 | - | Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|---------- | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and
accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of
Taitron Components Incorporated.

I, Stewart Wang, the Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of registrant, certify that to the best
of my knowledge:

| | (i) |  | the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) |  | the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all                material
respects, the financial condition and results of                operations of the
registrant.
| | ---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated August 16, 2004. |  |  | By:  | /s/ Stewart Wang
      Stewart Wang                              
|---------------------- |  |  | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | Its: | Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer



| | Page
14 | 
| | ------- | 

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      25,554,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,608,115
<PP&E>                                         164,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,685,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,686,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,359
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,995,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,685,152
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,232,397
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,069,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,163,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                   465,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            698,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   698,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 116/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.116.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 116 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 538 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.116.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 116

English edition

Legislation

Volume 538 May 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 10 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 10 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 9 Filed 06/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
#### ADKINS v. STATE.

No. 22328.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 9, 1942.

Rehearing Granted Jan. 27, 1943.

Hawkins & Myers, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a fine of $50 and thirty days in jail on a charge of procuring.

The record before us contains no bills of exception. The case was tried to the court without a jury and we are not advised as to the grounds for reversal which may be relied upon by appellant. Only two witnesses testified: the officer who made an investigation of the premises and the woman who was involved, according to the State’s theory, at the instance of appellant. The officer’s testimony made a case under the law, while the woman’s evidence entirely'exonerated him. Evidently the judge hearing the case did not believe her testimony. The guilt of the appellant depended upon his findings.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

On considering the motion for rehearing in this cause, we have re-examined the record and observe the following language of the complaint: “I, Harry G. Wood, being duly sworn do state upon my oath that I have good reason to believe that in said County of Harris and State of Texas, heretofore on or about the 8th day of April, A. D., 1942, W. A. Adkins did then and there invite, solicit, procure and allure a female, to-wit: Katherine Rutland, to be at a certain place to-wit: at a house, room and place located at 2111⁄8 *Milam*Street, in the city of Houston, Harris County, Texas, for the purpose of me'eting and having unlawful sexual intercourse with a male person.”

 It will be observed that it is nowhere alleged that affiant “does believe” the things set out in the complaint. The *1030fact that he had good reason to believe it is not sufficient: Art. 222, Subd. 2, C.C.P.; Branch’s P.C. § 478, Cook v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 492, 132 S.W.2d 404, Greeson v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 115, 147 S.W.2d 804. This defect was not called to our attention on original submission and was overlooked by us. While no complaint has been made in the motion for rehearing, we nevertheless consider it a fatal defect requiring that the motion for rehearing be granted ■and the judgment of the trial court be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed, which is accordingly done.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-362-000]

Take notice that on November 3, 2000, Southern Energy Delta, L.L.C. (SE Delta), and Southern Energy Potrero, L.L.C. (SE Potrero), tendered for filing revised tariff sheets to the Must-Run Service Agreements between SE Delta, SE Potrero, and the California Independent System Operator Corporation. The revisions include changes to the: (i) Contract Service Limits, (ii) Hourly Availability Charges and Penalty Rates, and (iii) projected outage information for the generating units owned by SE Delta and SE Potrero, for the year beginning January 1, 2001, as well as corrections to certain typographical errors.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before November 24, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions                           ( print page 69759)                        on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29591 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Kent Rylander 10/1/2015 Why Boeing believes AD 

action is required 

ATA Bob Ireland 10/9/2015 Pending AD to SB 

Other/ Additional Information: 

9
Case 4:22-cr-00220-O Document 25 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 32
Case 4:22-cr-00220-O Document 25 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 33
Case 2:22-cr-00061-Z-BR Document 28 Filed 08/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 66
#### In the Matter of Elizabeth R., and Others, Children Alleged to be Abused. Ramon R., Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered September 16, 1988, following a fact-finding hearing, which, *inter alia,*found respondent had abused the subject minor children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent father sexually abused his six-year-old daughter in August 1987, and derivatively abused two other minor children who were not sent to school. Contrary to the respondent father’s contention, we find that the hearing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in limiting the scope of respondent’s cross-examination of petitioner’s witness at the fact-finding hearing *(see, People v Duffy,*36 NY2d 258, *mot to amend remittitur granted*36 NY2d 857, *cert denied*423 US 861). Lastly, the Family Court had authority under Family Court Act § 1056 to issue an order of protection prohibiting the respondent father from unsupervised contact with his children for a period of 12 years, notwithstanding that its duration exceeded that of the dispositional order. *(Matter of Maritza B.,*164 AD2d 838; *Matter of Erin G.,*139 AD2d 737.) Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Kassal, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.